Speaker 1: Ryan brother. How's it going, my friend. It's good to see.
Speaker 2: You, you two writer, Good to see you two.
Speaker 1: We got a lot going on here, and I'm going
Speaker 1: to clear some things up really quickly.
Speaker 2: Yes, I saw your post on that.
Speaker 1: So I had Jay Widner on and Jay said the
Speaker 1: wrong name of the individual. He said Gregory s since
Speaker 1: and it's not Gregory Since. It's Paul Valeally. Colonel Paul E. Vallely, okay,
Speaker 1: And he sits on the board of directors at TPUSA.
Speaker 1: And he's also the co author of Sign Up to
Speaker 1: Mine War with Michael Akino. And here is his Wikipedia
Speaker 1: page here. Vallely served in the Vietnam War. Retired in
Speaker 1: nineteen ninety one. Valey co authored the book Mind War
Speaker 1: with Michael Aquino in two thousand and four. He has
Speaker 1: served as Military Committee chairman of the Center of Security
Speaker 1: Policy and runs a conservative political organization, Stand Up America US.
Speaker 1: Vallely was a part of the leadership of Charlie Kirk's
Speaker 1: Turning Point USA, seated on the advisory board. And I
Speaker 1: thought that that was kind of weird, was no, bro,
Speaker 1: He still is, okay, So we're gonna prove it right
Speaker 1: here and right now, and By the way, I was
Speaker 1: kind of corrected about this on Twitter, and it turns
Speaker 1: out that someone that has been on this show was
Speaker 1: the one that broke the story about Paul Valley. But
Speaker 1: her name is Dana Dooda. That's her tag on Twitter
Speaker 1: as Dana Douda. But I've had her on my show before.
Speaker 1: And someone commented on Twitter and was like, why are
Speaker 1: you taking someone's work? And I was like, well, first off,
Speaker 1: I wasn't the one that said it. Jay Widener said it.
Speaker 1: I put it into a clip. The discussion was live,
Speaker 1: mistakes get made, but here we are. But it was
Speaker 1: Dana du dah on Twitter that I've found this out.
Speaker 1: I just want to clear that up really quickly. But
Speaker 1: Advisory Council. Here we go. We're scrolling down. Can you
Speaker 1: see this on the screen? Ring, Oh, no, it's not
Speaker 1: up yet.
Speaker 3: Not here it is, No, I cannot see it yet.
Speaker 3: There it is Turning Point USA. This is the official website.
Speaker 3: Here's the Board of Directors. Here's the Advisory Council. If
Speaker 3: you scroll down here a little bit, it'll take you
Speaker 3: right here. Boom, right there.
Speaker 1: Who is that? Who is that Ryan?
Speaker 2: That's your man.
Speaker 1: That's the man, that's Paul Blailey. Okay, Now in this
Speaker 1: description here in his bio, it doesn't say that he
Speaker 1: of course, they want to admit that they that he
Speaker 1: didn't co author the book with known Satanist Michael Achino
Speaker 1: on Psychological Operations. You know, they don't put that at there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Kino was a specialist in psychological warfare, kind of
Speaker 2: like a Richard Doty type individual.
Speaker 1: For the military.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yep, and you know a Keno actually would have
Speaker 2: been ten eleven years ago, reached out to me from
Speaker 2: from for my show and said that he wanted to
Speaker 2: come on my show. This was the real Michael Lachino
Speaker 2: or you know. I checked, and I was kind of
Speaker 2: taken back by it because I thought my show, with
Speaker 2: it's occult angle, why would Michael Achino reach out to
Speaker 2: me to come on my show? So I kind of
Speaker 2: ignored him. What didn't kind of? I completely ignored him.
Speaker 2: I didn't respond back to it. I kind of wish
Speaker 2: now that I did, but I don't like to get
Speaker 2: involved with people like that. And the fact that Michael
Speaker 2: Laquino has any indirect or, I guess you could call
Speaker 2: that a direct connection tells me that the layers of
Speaker 2: this that could continue to get pilled back with the
Speaker 2: so called grassroots movements. Once again, it proves that it's
Speaker 2: not so grassroots. There's an organized power behind so called
Speaker 2: independent nature of these types of groups. And of course,
Speaker 2: where does all of it bring us? With the religious
Speaker 2: zelotry involved. It brings us to holy war religious war,
Speaker 2: and it brings us I don't think it was a
Speaker 2: real letter per se. I mean, it's a letter, the
Speaker 2: Albert Pike letter about World War III. But it brings
Speaker 2: us to that scenario where the Nihilists and the Luciferians
Speaker 2: or the Akinos, if you will, where their religion becomes
Speaker 2: dominant and all the other faiths are annihilated, at least conceptually.
Speaker 2: That's kind of the idea. So I saw that you
Speaker 2: had posted that, and I feel like I should be
Speaker 2: surprised by it. But I'm not surprised by that stuff anymore. Writer.
Speaker 2: It seems par for the chorus everywhere you look.
Speaker 1: Well, people were trying to roast me about it and
Speaker 1: singing that it wasn't gregorya since that he didn't co
Speaker 1: author anything with Michael Aquino, which isn't true. He did, well,
Speaker 1: he might have. I think he wrote be forward to
Speaker 1: mind War two of the other versions that was released
Speaker 1: later on. So I mean that technically makes you a
Speaker 1: co author. But I again, I wasn't the one. But
Speaker 1: this whole thing went viral, dude. It got millions of use.
Speaker 1: It blew up on Facebook if you typed in Gregory
Speaker 1: us and on Google. Right now my video is going
Speaker 1: to pop up. That's how big it blew up. And
Speaker 1: uh and I didn't realize that that Jay got the
Speaker 1: name of the guy wrong. And it's okay to make mistakes. Okay,
Speaker 1: people make mistakes all the time. It's just you gotta
Speaker 1: try and go back and when you if you did
Speaker 1: something wrong, you gotta try and go back and admit
Speaker 1: that you did and correct yourself. And that's exactly what
Speaker 1: I did. I made a pin comment on every one
Speaker 1: of the videos on Instagram, Facebook. I mean, this thing
Speaker 1: is influencing Google results, dude, Like it's really wild. But
Speaker 1: I went back and I went to all the videos
Speaker 1: that I posted everywhere, and I put a pin comment
Speaker 1: on there and I was like, hey, uh, ja got
Speaker 1: the name of the guy wrong. It is a guy
Speaker 1: that co wrote mind War. Sign opped the mind War
Speaker 1: with Michael Akino it's just not the guy that he
Speaker 1: said that it is. And we just proved right there
Speaker 1: that it's Paul Belelli. Okay, that sits on the board
Speaker 1: of Directors at TPUSA. He's an advisory council member of TPUSA,
Speaker 1: and he co wrote in two thousand and four with
Speaker 1: Michael Akino the book sigop to Mind War. It's a
Speaker 1: book on psychological manipulation and how it works and how
Speaker 1: it works by the military, and that became the blueprint
Speaker 1: of pretty much how psychological operations run and how they work.
Speaker 1: So yeah, it's uh, I think when people get to
Speaker 1: that point, because I could have I could have just
Speaker 1: let it run, you know what I mean. I could
Speaker 1: have just been like a whatever, I don't care, you know,
Speaker 1: and not put out any kind of even attempt to
Speaker 1: do a correction on it. But I was like, I
Speaker 1: don't feel good about that, you know, even though I
Speaker 1: wasn't the person decided it, even though I'm not the
Speaker 1: originator of the person that found this out. Again, that
Speaker 1: was Dana Doudah on Twitter okay, that started that found this.
Speaker 1: She was the first person to my knowledge, they found it.
Speaker 1: And even though I wasn't the person that did all
Speaker 1: of that, I still felt that it still didn't feel
Speaker 1: right with me. So I was like, cause, you got
Speaker 1: to have integrity when it comes to this stuff. Like
Speaker 1: you just can't be throwing out a bunch of stuff
Speaker 1: that isn't true and then you find out that it's
Speaker 1: not true and then you don't go back and try
Speaker 1: and correct it.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 1: I was like, well, I'm just going to do this
Speaker 1: or my own piece, you know, even though I really
Speaker 1: didn't have to, I needed to because I didn't feel
Speaker 1: right about it. So it's settled now. There's a pin
Speaker 1: comment on YouTube underneath the video. There's a pin comment
Speaker 1: on all the Facebook postings, there's a pin comment on Instagram.
Speaker 1: But one more time, just to clear it up. It's
Speaker 1: not Gregory, yes, since it's Paul E. Bliley, same concept,
Speaker 1: same thing. G You just got the name of the
Speaker 1: person wrong, and that's not when you're looking for memory Ryan.
Speaker 1: You know how this stuff goes. You get things mixed up.
Speaker 1: Sometimes you don't remember things, and that's not really a
Speaker 1: fault on anybody. When you're not reading from a script,
Speaker 1: you can jumble up your words, you can get things wrong,
Speaker 1: O get just so just wanted to clear that up
Speaker 1: with everyone. What do you think about this h this
Speaker 1: Ice shooting. Have you looked into any of that? It's
Speaker 1: really recent and really new.
Speaker 2: No, I haven't, I mean looked into it in regard
Speaker 2: to reading a lot about it. No, do I know
Speaker 2: what it is? Yes, And I can tell you my
Speaker 2: personal opinion is I really just don't care really anymore
Speaker 2: about any of this stuff. Not that I don't care
Speaker 2: about the idea that being debated about someone being shot, right,
Speaker 2: is it wrong? There's a time and place to discuss
Speaker 2: and debate that. Maybe there's a time and place for
Speaker 2: that nationally, but probably more so locally. I guess we're
Speaker 2: talking about federal agents. Maybe it's a federal thing. It's
Speaker 2: something that could be discussed, But I feel like with
Speaker 2: so many other things, we have far bigger problems. Like
Speaker 2: sixteen hundred people die a day from reversible, treatable, curable,
Speaker 2: doesn't need to exist heart disease. Sixteen hundred, I think
Speaker 2: the number actually grew. It might be up to eighteen
Speaker 2: hundred to two thousand now a day. That's a pandemic.
Speaker 2: That's a disaster every single day. Preventable, treatable, curable. There's
Speaker 2: no protest in the street over that there's no uh,
Speaker 2: no concern for that loss of human life. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact. Not to make this a political thing.
Speaker 2: I don't consider this political, but just to give you
Speaker 2: an idea of what we're dealing with. I listened to
Speaker 2: Benjamin at Yahoo say, and we've heard other members of
Speaker 2: the Israeli governments say this too in the past, that
Speaker 2: the lives of Israelis are worth more than the lives
Speaker 2: of Americans. I don't know if you saw that, Yes
Speaker 2: I did.
Speaker 4: What happened on October seventh, when over a thousand people
Speaker 4: are massacred in one fell swoop, that's equivalent to about
Speaker 4: forty thousand Americans massacred.
Speaker 2: And that's a pretty universal thing. It's not just Israelis.
Speaker 2: It's universal. Like Christians tend to, not exclusively, but tend
Speaker 2: to think their lives are more important than Muslims. I'm
Speaker 2: sure that there's a lot of Muslims who think that
Speaker 2: their lives are more important than Christians, a lot of Americans.
Speaker 2: I know this as a criticism I get sometimes on
Speaker 2: my show that a lot of Americans think that their
Speaker 2: lives are more important than the lives of anybody else.
Speaker 2: With the exception maybe of Israelis or I guess they
Speaker 2: can see that they're more important than American lives are.
Speaker 2: Plus America spans more than just the states. I mean,
Speaker 2: if you're in Central or South America, you're technically American,
Speaker 2: and I guess those lives don't matter as much. And
Speaker 2: I'm sure that the feeling is mutual across borders, that
Speaker 2: others feel that, you know, they're superior, or if not superior,
Speaker 2: just that their lives matter more. This is the kind
Speaker 2: of thing that gets to me, you know, especially with
Speaker 2: the sixteen to two thousand, sixteen hundred to two thousand
Speaker 2: people that die day from preventable, reversible, curable doesn't need
Speaker 2: to exist heart disease on top of other things like
Speaker 2: lung problems from smoking and whatnot. Is that we don't
Speaker 2: really value human life across the board equally. It's kind
Speaker 2: of selective. So if one person gets shot, this is
Speaker 2: what makes me upset. And my real true opinion on
Speaker 2: that story is that when somebody gets shot, the only
Speaker 2: reason there's people protesting is because of politics. They're not
Speaker 2: protest because of the loss of life. It was a tragedy.
Speaker 2: Maybe there's five people out there doing that, or maybe
Speaker 2: the families doing that. But I feel like most of
Speaker 2: it's just politics.
Speaker 1: It seems like another type of George Floyd type of
Speaker 1: thing that they're trying to get everyone rowed up about.
Speaker 1: Do you remember the the ice protests in LA last year.
Speaker 1: Of course, yeah, it happened, and it seems like that's
Speaker 1: where it's all kind of culminating to, is they want
Speaker 1: to get everybody in an uproar about like ice and
Speaker 1: deportation and all of that. I mean, I've seen somebody
Speaker 1: today wearing a few ICE shirt. I didn't know if
Speaker 1: you was talking about meth amphetamine or government agency ice.
Speaker 2: Yes, it's it's It's funny how those things, like the
Speaker 2: T shirts and the signs and the slogans, just like
Speaker 2: with every other protest, they all appear overnight around the
Speaker 2: whole country. As if you could have forget even five
Speaker 2: people to get to play basketball after school, and yet
Speaker 2: we can get these things organized literally overnight. And that
Speaker 2: was even before social media this stuff. When feminism as
Speaker 2: a movement first started to blossom in the United States,
Speaker 2: the original founders of feminism were to two of them
Speaker 2: were actresses. They were literally street performers, and that's what
Speaker 2: they did. They would go on the streets and they
Speaker 2: would perform, and they had make this big production. And
Speaker 2: that's how they convinced people that this was a righteous movement,
Speaker 2: not exclusively, but in part. That's part of the history,
Speaker 2: and that's what a lot of this is. It's like
Speaker 2: theater kids going out and live action role playing revolution.
Speaker 2: Although I think a lot of the motivation behind a
Speaker 2: lot of the money behind this stuff is real revolution.
Speaker 2: It's color revolution, it's Red guards, it's Maus Guards, etc.
Speaker 2: But just my thought, and this is across the board,
Speaker 2: as I said, for pretty much any issue, is that
Speaker 2: we don't value human life equally. I mean, I will say,
Speaker 2: I don't know if you'd agree with me, but I
Speaker 2: would say that if we're starting as a default, like
Speaker 2: all people are equal, but if you're a rapist and
Speaker 2: a murderer who keeps raping and murdering people, your life
Speaker 2: now has less value as far as I'm concerned, and
Speaker 2: as a society, as a functioning society, usually those kinds
Speaker 2: of people that do those types of things, they are
Speaker 2: usually either executed by the state or they're locked away
Speaker 2: for good, and their lives do mean less, not because
Speaker 2: they're a certain color, or a certain race, or a
Speaker 2: nationality or religion. It's because you raped and murdered people.
Speaker 2: And that's the idea. And there are certainly some cultures
Speaker 2: that again, if we're looking at it from a default,
Speaker 2: let's learn about everything, But there are some cultures that
Speaker 2: are genuinely less advanced and less developed than others. And
Speaker 2: it's not even necessarily a matter of like, oh, you're better,
Speaker 2: it's just a matter of some are more advanced than
Speaker 2: some are more some are, some are more advanced, some
Speaker 2: or less advanced in one way or another. So when
Speaker 2: it comes to human life, I think that you can't
Speaker 2: really have an honest conversation about those types of things
Speaker 2: unless you are willing to say that, no, the lives
Speaker 2: of Israelis are not more important than the lives of Americans. Know,
Speaker 2: the lives of Jews or Christians are not more important
Speaker 2: than the lives of Muslims or Buddhists or atheists for
Speaker 2: that matter. Human life should be valued equally across the board.
Speaker 2: But that shouldn't be a stagnated thing. It should adapt
Speaker 2: and change based on the conditions. So again, if you
Speaker 2: are a psychopath and you're doing very bad things, to people. Yeah,
Speaker 2: then I think that your life is reduced to that
Speaker 2: below the people that you're hurting. So anyway, that's my thought,
Speaker 2: and I think it's something that I've actually considered doing
Speaker 2: a show on in general, because I was thinking about
Speaker 2: that in regard to something else. Then you ask me
Speaker 2: that question about the Ice shooting, and it's just like,
Speaker 2: in a nutshell, we should probably reconsider how we value
Speaker 2: human life, and we should reevaluate death as well, in
Speaker 2: terms of like those people that die from preventable, treatable,
Speaker 2: curable diseases that don't need to exist and don't exist
Speaker 2: in a lot of parts of the world. And it's
Speaker 2: also just disgusting. Again, in a nutshell, it's discussing that
Speaker 2: people make it about politics, like very few people are concerned,
Speaker 2: Oh my god, she died. You didn't know her. There's
Speaker 2: protests in Tucson, Arizona, over that you didn't know the woman.
Speaker 2: You don't know anything about the woman. All you know
Speaker 2: is what was put on TV or what was put
Speaker 2: on social media. And then you've got signs like actually,
Speaker 2: in West Virginia, a friend of mine sent me a
Speaker 2: picture from downtown that they had protests in West Virginia
Speaker 2: in Morgantown and then in Tucson for what you don't
Speaker 2: even they probably can't even name the name of the
Speaker 2: what's the name of the woman that was that was killed? Now,
Speaker 2: what did she do? Like I watched the video and
Speaker 2: I thought, well, they told her to stop, and she
Speaker 2: tried to drive away, but she almost hit the guy
Speaker 2: and he said stop, and then she drove anyway. I
Speaker 2: don't know the context of that. He might have been
Speaker 2: justified in shooting her. It doesn't really matter to me
Speaker 2: because again, the human life thing, and people only care
Speaker 2: because it's political. So it's kind of disgusting. That's my feeling.
Speaker 1: Well, I have a couple of things here. One is,
Speaker 1: we don't know if that woman spoke English, Ryan, she
Speaker 1: was an illegal immigrant. Maybe she didn't know what the
Speaker 1: word stop meant. Maybe she did context context, I don't know, Ryan,
Speaker 1: I don't know who knows. But I think that people
Speaker 1: like to put the label in front of things or
Speaker 1: behind things to get other people that are in that
Speaker 1: group in an uproar. It's like when they were like
Speaker 1: they're killing Christians and other countries they're killing. Why is
Speaker 1: it just Christians? Where was that at that wasn't Venezuela,
Speaker 1: was it. It was some other country Niger? Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's Nie July.
Speaker 2: I can I can speak on that one. Yeah, go ahead.
Speaker 1: Like Christians are being slaughtered all the time, all day
Speaker 1: every day. I'm like, well, why is it Christians? Like
Speaker 1: why is it just not people? Why can't we just
Speaker 1: say people? But they have to say Christians at the
Speaker 1: end of it, because that gets the the right all
Speaker 1: up in this world, this florry of the Christians, you can't,
Speaker 1: don't mess with the Christians are killing Christians everything. It's
Speaker 1: a better headline. And we've been seeing this for a
Speaker 1: really long time. It's about the headline. It's about the title.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter how truthful or in factual it is,
Speaker 1: as long as it sounds good, you.
Speaker 2: Know, or or if you show people the actual evidence
Speaker 2: of it, Like I could pull up the State Department,
Speaker 2: I could pull up other countries like France that have
Speaker 2: done investigations into the people in Nigeria being killed. I
Speaker 2: could pull up in the Nigerian government's investigation. I could
Speaker 2: pull up books that have been written about it for decades. Well,
Speaker 2: it's been known about half century plus. Show that to
Speaker 2: people don't care It's like, so you're responding to what
Speaker 2: you read on social media or what some politician said,
Speaker 2: But when I'm showing you the actual data, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 2: I mean, some people are persuaded by it if they're
Speaker 2: rational people with open minds, but that kind of stuff
Speaker 2: doesn't go viral on social media, like I posted that stuff,
Speaker 2: like the State Department report about even about Venezuela. There's
Speaker 2: a DEA DOJ report. It's one of the more recent
Speaker 2: reports from twenty twenty four, and it literally, unless I
Speaker 2: don't know what I'm doing, I typed in Venezuela. Venezuela
Speaker 2: is not mentioned in the DEA DOJ Drug report. They
Speaker 2: have zero, they have zero involvement in that drug in
Speaker 2: the drug trade. I mean, maybe there's a little bit
Speaker 2: that goes through there, but it's not at all like
Speaker 2: Mexico or other countries. So why does the official federal
Speaker 2: report on drug trafficking not even mentioned Venezuela or mentions it.
Speaker 2: There's an executive order from Biden that mentions it in passing,
Speaker 2: So like that shouldn't that be That's like evidence, same
Speaker 2: thing in ni Jerry with the State Department. In fact,
Speaker 2: they've shown that it's not just Christians, it's Muslims, and
Speaker 2: in fact, Muslims are being killed at a higher rate
Speaker 2: than Christians. Depending on what part of part of the
Speaker 2: I guess part of the data set you're looking at it,
Speaker 2: or it's pretty equal, we could say, just to be
Speaker 2: really objective, it's pretty equal. Yeah, you show that to people.
Speaker 2: No Christians, Christians, only the Christians. Christians. They're not even
Speaker 2: American citizens. This is another thing that's confusing to your point.
Speaker 2: It is it's propaganda. I think it's Israeli propaganda, but
Speaker 2: it's it's propaganda, a little bit of truth mixed with
Speaker 2: a little bit of lie to distract and to divide
Speaker 2: into persuade Christians. These are your brothers and sisters, and
Speaker 2: we need to save them with military operations. And it's again,
Speaker 2: it's just totally disgusting.
Speaker 1: There's been this really weird resurgence of Christianity, and I
Speaker 1: don't necessarily want to get into it here because we
Speaker 1: really don't have the time to actually get into the
Speaker 1: full in depth conversation. You have to wait for another time.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have to have longer than an hour to
Speaker 1: really get to the roots of Christianity and where a
Speaker 1: lot of this even comes from. But it feels like
Speaker 1: that all you need to do ryan to topple and
Speaker 1: overthrow a government. You all you got to do is
Speaker 1: they're killing Christians, they're drug traffickers, and their people hate them.
Speaker 1: So we got to go in there, pupple this entire government,
Speaker 1: install our own people in there. It reminds me of
Speaker 1: that weird Ale song.
Speaker 2: Do you ever listen to weird al Oh, yeah, of course, Well.
Speaker 1: He has a song that's like you did a parody
Speaker 1: of Party in the USA by Miley Cyrus. But it's
Speaker 1: a part in the way.
Speaker 2: I think I've heard that before.
Speaker 1: You That's what it really seems like, though, is like.
Speaker 1: And if you don't think that the government is looking
Speaker 1: for things that are trending online as well to use
Speaker 1: that against the people to persuade them in a certain way,
Speaker 1: then and they're probably the ones that are responsible for
Speaker 1: it to begin with. They're probably the ones that create
Speaker 1: the trends. I'm sure some of it is organic, some
Speaker 1: of it has to be organic, but they have to
Speaker 1: be paying attention. And what's really popular right now is
Speaker 1: this new wave of Christianity that is sweeping over the
Speaker 1: country and it's like this reversion and reverting back to
Speaker 1: I mean, there's something inherently wrong when you read the
Speaker 1: Bible and you don't think that there's something inherently wrong
Speaker 1: with it? Is there something that isn't right with it
Speaker 1: within your the very fiber of your being, Like should
Speaker 1: be for everybody. There should be a bunch of different
Speaker 1: questions that you have. If you just read through any
Speaker 1: book of the Bible, you should come out of that
Speaker 1: and be like, this doesn't feel like the whole story.
Speaker 1: Something's got to be left out of this. There's got
Speaker 1: to be some books missing some paragraphs me. And that
Speaker 1: is the case. I mean, as much as the Bible
Speaker 1: has been we've written, it's just borrowed and borrowed. And
Speaker 1: we've talked about this and some shows before. It's just
Speaker 1: borrowed off of much older, much more established religions, and
Speaker 1: it's gotten the greatest ins. But it's essentially what the
Speaker 1: government is doing right now. It's monitoring all of the
Speaker 1: stuff that's going on online, and then they repackage that
Speaker 1: thing to influence the culture, to push the culture in
Speaker 1: a certain way, in a certain narrative. That's exactly what
Speaker 1: the Church did with religion, took a little bit from
Speaker 1: over here, took a little bit from over year, and
Speaker 1: then cultivated and created their own new cult.
Speaker 2: Have you heard of Show faith Works? Have you heard
Speaker 2: of that group, Show faith Works?
Speaker 1: No? I have.
Speaker 2: So Show faith Works is registered under Farah and there's
Speaker 2: a foreign I think there's a recent I think it's
Speaker 2: recent twenty twenty five, there's a recent FARA paper on
Speaker 2: this or like the the paperwork that they filed as
Speaker 2: a foreign agent. And when they registered, they you know,
Speaker 2: they submit all this information to the government. They're lobbying
Speaker 2: on behalf of foreign government. So it's an Israeli group,
Speaker 2: and they have a whole slide show of what their
Speaker 2: their motivation is in the United States, like what they're
Speaker 2: going to be doing and lobbying for, and the whole
Speaker 2: Show faith Works, which I think is a very small
Speaker 2: piece of a much larger unregistered movement to persuade the
Speaker 2: American public to believe and to trust and to back
Speaker 2: certain things. But this one's registered and it shows you
Speaker 2: that they want to It says this in bullet points.
Speaker 2: This is part of their registration. They're going to target churches,
Speaker 2: They're going to geofins Christian events. They're going to target pastors,
Speaker 2: they're going to target Christian groups and communities. And part
Speaker 2: of the way that they're going to do that, this
Speaker 2: is all in their own paperwork. This is I'm not
Speaker 2: even exaggerating or paraphrasing, like it actually says that they're
Speaker 2: going to target pastors, they're going to go after geofinns, churches,
Speaker 2: et cetera. And one of the things that I read,
Speaker 2: which you saw this well, I would assume you saw
Speaker 2: this during Christmas time, there's a bunch of stuff on
Speaker 2: social media about how Jesus was not a Palestinian was
Speaker 2: a in Israeli. I thought that was weird because I've
Speaker 2: never thought Jesus was a Palestinian. Who thinks Jesus is
Speaker 2: a Palestinian I've never talk to. I grew up a
Speaker 2: Christian and I never talked to anybody who without Jesus
Speaker 2: was a Palestinian. So I saw that and it's like, no,
Speaker 2: Jesus is actually in ISRAELI. I was like, I don't
Speaker 2: think either one of those things could be argued. I
Speaker 2: don't think he would have been in Israeli because Israel
Speaker 2: wasn't a place in the term doesn't mean what people
Speaker 2: say that it means etymologically, and I don't think he
Speaker 2: was a Palestinian, so what does that mean? But when
Speaker 2: I read the FAR report for Show Faith Works, their
Speaker 2: registration papers, it says precisely that. It says that they're
Speaker 2: going to try to use the image of Jesus to
Speaker 2: convince Christians that Jesus was in Israeli. Jesus was part
Speaker 2: of the Jewish movement, and that is why you should
Speaker 2: support not only know they assume you support Jesus, you're
Speaker 2: a Christian, you love Jesus, but you should by default
Speaker 2: support Israel as a state today, modern political Israel. It's
Speaker 2: crazy stuff and that you could, like, you could watch
Speaker 2: Show Faith Work in real time from their FAR registration
Speaker 2: to what's on social media. And in fact, there was
Speaker 2: just the Times of Israel report that came out I
Speaker 2: believe it was yesterday or the day before yesterday, that
Speaker 2: showed that half of all that Israeli stuff on social media,
Speaker 2: this is just what they admit. Half of it's all
Speaker 2: Israeli bots. It's just bought accounts pushing the Christian narrative.
Speaker 2: And in fact, they say that they're going to end
Speaker 2: this document they or the registration papers. They're going to
Speaker 2: shift more into Christian propaganda. That's why when I did
Speaker 2: my show in Nigeria a couple of weeks ago, or
Speaker 2: maybe a couple of months ago, now, I said, it's
Speaker 2: Israeli propaganda. How's it is really propaganda? Ryan, it's Nigeria,
Speaker 2: it's Christians, because they're not Americans, they're Christians. Muslims are
Speaker 2: being killed too. In fact, they're being killed at a
Speaker 2: higher rate in some places. And they want you angry
Speaker 2: about this because they want you to feel like you're
Speaker 2: a part of some big Christian movement so that you
Speaker 2: will hate Muslims and go to war with the Arab
Speaker 2: Muslim world yet again, and waste trillions of dollars in
Speaker 2: American life in the name of some religious holy war.
Speaker 2: And this is like, this is what the propaganda is
Speaker 2: that they've changed from, like Israeli directly is really propaganda,
Speaker 2: to more Christian Jesus propaganda. And one other thing I'll
Speaker 2: add to I think is really critically important writer, is
Speaker 2: that when people argue and debate about the Bible, I
Speaker 2: think for years I've missed a really, really critical perspective
Speaker 2: that I just kind of realized on my own, and
Speaker 2: that is I don't really understand why we even debate
Speaker 2: the Bible. I don't get it, Like every conversation about
Speaker 2: that is based on the assumption that everybody knows that,
Speaker 2: like this is the book, but there's a whole bunch
Speaker 2: of other books too, Like why why aren't we debating
Speaker 2: the validity of the Bagavad Gita. Why aren't we debating
Speaker 2: the validity of the mantras of Buddha. Oh, that's just
Speaker 2: that's devil worship.
Speaker 1: That's I'll tell you ryan. Because their demons.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because they're demons. So it's it's all based on
Speaker 2: like this assumed and implied belief. And I don't get
Speaker 2: it because I think the Bible teaches the same thing
Speaker 2: the Baghabad Ghita teaches. It teaches the same thing the Karanate.
Speaker 2: I don't really care. Even if something is a fraudulent document,
Speaker 2: if it teaches the same thing, then it teaches the
Speaker 2: same thing. So that's something that I don't understand. And
Speaker 2: then you got to ask people the question, how exactly
Speaker 2: is it that You've probably heard me ask this before,
Speaker 2: but why are the safest, cleanest parts of the world,
Speaker 2: from Singapore to Tokyo to soul Korea. I mean, Soul
Speaker 2: Korea is about twenty percent Christian population, Singapore is like
Speaker 2: fourteen percent. Tokyo's like point less than one percent. How
Speaker 2: come the cleanest, safest cities in the world are not
Speaker 2: predominantly Christian And in fact, I mean in the case
Speaker 2: of Japan, it's like atheists. They're not atheists, but it's
Speaker 2: just it's not really definable by Western terms. So they
Speaker 2: don't need the Bible in Singapore to know not to murder,
Speaker 2: so I don't or in Tokyo to not to murder people.
Speaker 2: So I don't really get white places with the Bible
Speaker 2: and with the Ten Commandments have higher murder rates than
Speaker 2: places without it. I'm confused by that. And when you
Speaker 2: ask people those questions, and it's not a slight at
Speaker 2: the Ten Commandments of the Bible. It's just a question
Speaker 2: of why do people who don't know anything about the
Speaker 2: Bible or the Ten Commandments no not to murder people
Speaker 2: because they don't have the Bible in ten commandments? How
Speaker 2: do they know not to lie? Because those things are
Speaker 2: not dictated by Jesus or a law or Jave. It's
Speaker 2: just like that's how you have a functioning, civil, respectful society. Anyway,
Speaker 2: I yield back my time.
Speaker 1: You sum that up perfectly. We don't need something to
Speaker 1: tell us how to not murder or to not kill people,
Speaker 1: to not lie and cheat and steal. That should be
Speaker 1: inherently done. And if you can't explain your faith without
Speaker 1: quoting scripture, if you cannot describe God without quoting scripture,
Speaker 1: then your entire belief system is surrounded by a book
Speaker 1: of ideas in theology, you don't really have a belief
Speaker 1: in it. You know, Like, if you ask a Christian
Speaker 1: that goes to church twice a week to describe God,
Speaker 1: at some point they're going to quote some kind of scripture.
Speaker 1: They're gonna be like, oh, well, it says it says
Speaker 1: in the twelve Book of Thumb and Daniel two point
Speaker 1: three to zero that God is love, Like, you don't
Speaker 1: need to describe something based off of a book. And
Speaker 1: don't get me wrong, I don't have a problem with
Speaker 1: people that are Christians. I don't have a problem with
Speaker 1: people that are Muslim. I don't have a problem with
Speaker 1: any of those people. I don't have a problem with
Speaker 1: the Jewish people. They can believe whatever they want to believe. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's on them. If it helps them better their life,
Speaker 1: then more power to them. If that works for them,
Speaker 1: then great, double thumbs up. It wasn't in like ten
Speaker 1: years ago. They did a survey in the United States
Speaker 1: and like a lot of churches were closing and like
Speaker 1: shutting down because nobody was going to church. It was
Speaker 1: like the least popular thing within young people. It was
Speaker 1: only like the older generation of people, like Christianity was
Speaker 1: down low, bro so low that it was tanking hardcore.
Speaker 1: And I have to bring up the statistics, but it
Speaker 1: was around ten years ago, whereas.
Speaker 2: Like it's below fifty percent. I think for the first
Speaker 2: time ever, like half the country doesn't go to church
Speaker 2: or something like that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it was unbelievable. And now we're seeing like nothing
Speaker 1: but this and people know that it's that there's something
Speaker 1: not right about it. That's the thing that I keep
Speaker 1: coming back to you. You know that there's something not
Speaker 1: right here, but you're choosing to double down on it
Speaker 1: anyway because it makes you feel better and you feel
Speaker 1: like you need to be a good person and that
Speaker 1: you need to get into heaven. And the only way
Speaker 1: that you're going to get into heaven is if you
Speaker 1: go to church every freaking week and read your Bible
Speaker 1: every single day. You be a good person because being
Speaker 1: a good person is what you're supposed to do. You
Speaker 1: don't be a good person because a book tells you
Speaker 1: to be a good person. That's it.
Speaker 2: Yet, have you looked at the political division with the
Speaker 2: lack of people going to church or whether less and
Speaker 2: less people going to church one reason churches have adopted
Speaker 2: that dei rainbow trans flag motif. I saw that a
Speaker 2: lot in Tucson, a lot. In fact, most of them
Speaker 2: church has had like trans and rainbow flags flying. So
Speaker 2: that turns off a lot of people. But then on
Speaker 2: the other side, when you change administrations and you get
Speaker 2: more conservative people perceptually in power, then you just have
Speaker 2: this like I'm the church and donate for Israel, or
Speaker 2: like the pastor I sent you who's with It's just
Speaker 2: like a come It's like a it's like a sketch
Speaker 2: comedy show. It's pastor with music playing and the oil
Speaker 2: belongs to God in Venezuela and to the Lord Jesus,
Speaker 2: and it belongs to us as Americans. It's like, is
Speaker 2: this There's no way you're that you're serious. All of
Speaker 2: the natural and the oil of this spirit is mine,
Speaker 2: says the Lord. So you get that. So it's like
Speaker 2: it's just like with the idea of America in general,
Speaker 2: or just our country, where the left is concerned and
Speaker 2: obsessed with blacks and the right is concerned us with Jews.
Speaker 2: And that's despite the fact that blacks and Jews and
Speaker 2: everybody else are just Americans. But each side has to
Speaker 2: pick some special group to wag in people's faces for
Speaker 2: why they can get away or should be able to
Speaker 2: get away with their fraud and corruption and lying and
Speaker 2: murdering and wars. Oh look Blacks, Oh look Jews. I
Speaker 2: don't care. It should be about everybody, and nobody should
Speaker 2: have special preferential treatment. That's the whole point of the country,
Speaker 2: that's the whole point of our founding principles. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, writer, I saw a video. I am
Speaker 2: increasingly very disliking this guy. I didn't I ever trusted
Speaker 2: him anyway, but I always thought I could have a
Speaker 2: conversation with him. Now I'm quite sure he's probably a
Speaker 2: federal agent or a useful idiot. And that's Nick foynt
Speaker 2: As Nick Foyntes is pushing I just saw another viral video.
Speaker 2: Nick Foytes is pushing the ideas like we know, if
Speaker 2: you go to some of these Gulf States, if you
Speaker 2: go to like Dubai, you go to these places, it's
Speaker 2: just kind of accept when you get there that you
Speaker 2: don't make fun of Islam and that you adhere to
Speaker 2: the local customs. Why can't we have that in the
Speaker 2: United States, which I was like, yes, and then he
Speaker 2: went a step further and said for Christianity, It's like,
Speaker 2: because this is in Dubai, this is the United States
Speaker 2: of America, and we have a First Amendment, and I
Speaker 2: don't have to You can't compel me, nor can you
Speaker 2: prevent me from practicing Islam or Christianity or Buddhism. The
Speaker 2: government can't stop me, and the government can't make me.
Speaker 2: That's what the First Amendment is all about. That's why
Speaker 2: you don't have to adhere to the principles of Christianity,
Speaker 2: which are universal when you come to the US. You
Speaker 2: don't have to pledge allegiance to Jesus when you come
Speaker 2: to the US. That's utterly absurd. This is not a
Speaker 2: Muslim country, it's not a Christian country. It's a you
Speaker 2: can believe you can believe in practice whatever you want. Country.
Speaker 2: That's the first Amendment. And it feels like everybody's forgotten that.
Speaker 1: It seems like they're trying to real people back into
Speaker 1: the whole thing to gain control over everyone again. I mean,
Speaker 1: things got wild and out of crazy, out of really
Speaker 1: crazy in the sixties with the hippie movement, which was
Speaker 1: all controlled by the CIA. They had to put a
Speaker 1: squash on that. They killed the music of that time.
Speaker 1: They killed the most people that was the most popular
Speaker 1: during that time, Jimmy Hendricks, Jim Morrison, you know, all
Speaker 1: these people that were really popular to take them into
Speaker 1: this new era. And then they put the ice pick
Speaker 1: in that whole thing, which was the Manson tape murders,
Speaker 1: which just completely smashed the entire hippie movement. And carrying
Speaker 1: that forward, they're trying to get people back into this, uh,
Speaker 1: this this state of control because things have gone so
Speaker 1: haywire and wacky that people no longer know what to believe.
Speaker 1: And that is that has been the goal since the
Speaker 1: very beginning. You have this structured type of religion. If
Speaker 1: anybody ever goes outside of the lines. While there's not
Speaker 1: a group of people that they can get behind that
Speaker 1: lets them freely talk about their ideas and freely talk
Speaker 1: about their beliefs besides online and in places like this,
Speaker 1: like and there are a bunch of New Age centers
Speaker 1: and stuff like that. But even new Age stuff is
Speaker 1: super freaking whacky. Did It's like it's sometimes just as
Speaker 1: baund So it's like, even though alternatives, it's no wonder
Speaker 1: people keep getting pulled back into the Christianity religious church
Speaker 1: movement is because it seems like it's the only institutionalized
Speaker 1: religion that anybody can really go to in the United States.
Speaker 1: Would you agree with that?
Speaker 2: No, not necessarily, but I know the idea of what
Speaker 2: you're getting at. There are Buddhist centers all over the US,
Speaker 2: and there are lots of mosques. Seek there, seek temples.
Speaker 2: There's a bunch of those in Tucson. I guess it
Speaker 2: depends on where you live, the availability of that stuff.
Speaker 2: But like, if you want to build I think it.
Speaker 2: Let me look this up real quick. Where is that?
Speaker 2: Where are they building that Hindu center in the US.
Speaker 2: Did you read about that?
Speaker 1: It was actually a really I mean, it's Hindu place
Speaker 1: in West Virginia. That's the Temple of Gold it's like
Speaker 1: made out of gold. Do you know about that?
Speaker 2: Well in West Virginia, No, I don't. I don't know
Speaker 2: that one. There's a I'm thinking there's a big temple
Speaker 2: that's being built some Oh, yes, it's in Tennessee. Yeah,
Speaker 2: well there's there's a whole there's actually several of them.
Speaker 2: This is one of them in Tennessee. There's several places
Speaker 2: being built, and there it's totally protected by the First Amendment.
Speaker 2: I mean, there's how many. When I lived in Tucson,
Speaker 2: there was a Sikh temple, there was a mosque, there
Speaker 2: was a Buddhist temple. There was a Jewish center that
Speaker 2: was like the size of four city blocks with a
Speaker 2: giant manore that lit up the street. And there were
Speaker 2: a bunch of churches with rainbow flags hanging off of them.
Speaker 2: There's a like that's the whole point of the United States,
Speaker 2: Like we can just freely worship whatever we want to worship.
Speaker 2: You want to worship in idle, worship aniole, you don't
Speaker 2: want to worship anything, you don't want worship anything. That's fine.
Speaker 2: Christianity overall, I think is it's more accepted because it's
Speaker 2: more familiar. But the problem. This is the problem I
Speaker 2: think with maybe not a problem, but it's it's it's
Speaker 2: part of the issue of of of the of the
Speaker 2: First Amendment is that you can only have a population
Speaker 2: that is like a civil population, where we can respect
Speaker 2: and appreciate other people. You can only have that if
Speaker 2: the population is taught to respect other people. And we're
Speaker 2: not taught that. We're taught the Muslims are heathens, or
Speaker 2: the Christians are heathens, or the Jews are heathens, or
Speaker 2: the Buddhists or heathens, and it's like most of them
Speaker 2: are teaching the same exact thing. And even if they weren't,
Speaker 2: you have the right to go to any of these
Speaker 2: places and you can believe whatever you want to believe.
Speaker 2: And when we get into the territory that you've you've
Speaker 2: probably seen writer, I know my audience has. You get
Speaker 2: to the territory of like we got to ban Islam,
Speaker 2: we got to ban the Koran. And you know what,
Speaker 2: I say, I got physical copies of them, so I'm good.
Speaker 2: I'm not giving those physical copies up. I got digital
Speaker 2: copies too, I'm not giving them up. I say, you
Speaker 2: know what do it? I say, ban the Koran? I
Speaker 2: say ban Islam because I'm gonna sit back and I'm
Speaker 2: gonna I'm gonna watch in just joy and glee that
Speaker 2: the next step will be the Bible's banned, Christianity's banned.
Speaker 2: So keep pushing for the banning of Islam and Korans,
Speaker 2: because you're going to get the Bible banned too. It's
Speaker 2: already on the chopping block. In fact, if anything gets
Speaker 2: banned first, it will be the Bible. Under the IHR
Speaker 2: a definition of anti Semitism. The Bible is already considered
Speaker 2: a hateful document, and that's not the Muslims doing that.
Speaker 2: So I guess in a nut show, what I'm getting
Speaker 2: at here in response to what you said is a
Speaker 2: lot of this is because of true ignorance, like genuinely
Speaker 2: profound ignorance, where we go back to the life again.
Speaker 2: We don't value life equally. We see people as being
Speaker 2: less than us, or if not less just I guess
Speaker 2: it's implied by the fact that we might think that
Speaker 2: we're superior, Oh believe we believe in the superior religion
Speaker 2: or we believe in the superior This that's why America
Speaker 2: doesn't work right now, because we're not abiding by universal
Speaker 2: Maxims or the founding principles. We're actually doing the very
Speaker 2: opposite of all those things, and that's why things seem
Speaker 2: the way that they or they seem to be going
Speaker 2: so poorly. And when you start arguing, oh, well, we
Speaker 2: should just make it mandatory that you have to pledge
Speaker 2: legions to Jesus at the airports, and we should make
Speaker 2: it mandatory that Qurans have to be you know, it's outlawed,
Speaker 2: it's illegal. Well, okay, it's kind of ironic too, because
Speaker 2: if you went to somewhere like Siri, or like if
Speaker 2: you went to Damascus before the US liberated it, wink wink,
Speaker 2: it was one of the most accepting religious places in
Speaker 2: the world. In fact, and I know this because I
Speaker 2: talked to several people that were from Syria. I talked
Speaker 2: to and I knew a girl from Damascus from the city,
Speaker 2: and she said that it was similar to the United States.
Speaker 2: In fact, it might have been more free than the
Speaker 2: United States because she said, you know, the persecution that
Speaker 2: Muslims get in the US, there's not that persecution for
Speaker 2: Christians and Damascus, so that's not universal throughout the Middle East.
Speaker 2: But like Iran, they have Christmas there they have subways
Speaker 2: dedicated to the Virgin Mary. It's very, very weird when
Speaker 2: you're told the opposite of all those things. And most
Speaker 2: of these countries actually welcome Christians and welcome Christianity, and
Speaker 2: even if they're Muslim countries, which you could even last thing,
Speaker 2: you could even argue like, okay, if America's mostly made
Speaker 2: of Christians, which it is, it's like sixty something percent Christian,
Speaker 2: that's fine, But that's just that doesn't negate the fact
Speaker 2: that everybody can also practice and believe whatever they want
Speaker 2: to practice and believe, and that is true intolerance. It's
Speaker 2: true intolerance. Like with the thing with JD. Vance's wife,
Speaker 2: I can't stand Jadievans. I think he's a gross human being.
Speaker 2: I think he's a disgusting person. I think he's a sellout.
Speaker 2: I think he's a fraud. He might even be filled
Speaker 2: with nanites. I'm joking about that. But with his relationship
Speaker 2: with Peter Till, I'm not sure what they've done to him. Again,
Speaker 2: I'm joking about the nanites. But when I look at
Speaker 2: his wife, Usha Vance, I actually think she's just like
Speaker 2: a decent looking woman, and I don't have an issue
Speaker 2: with her because She's Hindu, and yet the Christian conservative
Speaker 2: people became exactly what the liberal wackos accuse them of,
Speaker 2: intolerant racists. Great, you've now fulfilled that exact same thing
Speaker 2: with Vivid Brahmaswami. I don't like him either. Smart guy,
Speaker 2: but I don't like him either. He's now Actually he's
Speaker 2: probably one of the most articulate politicians who has spoken
Speaker 2: on a stage nationally in decades, one of the most articulate.
Speaker 2: He's not a street pooper, and neither is Oosha Vance.
Speaker 2: She's a very normal looking, mildly decently attractive woman who
Speaker 2: is just like not She's not quote white. So the
Speaker 2: people both sides have turned each other into the things
Speaker 2: that they claim to not be. And to me, that
Speaker 2: is I mean, Trump's is a whole nother show. That
Speaker 2: to me is It's indicative of that there is a
Speaker 2: psychological methodology being employed to do that. I don't think
Speaker 2: that that happens. Maybe some of the ignorant, like natural ignorance, yes,
Speaker 2: but I think a lot of that is is the media,
Speaker 2: social media, it's movies, it's TV shows. I mean, I
Speaker 2: give you one last example. Julian Assange said it probably
Speaker 2: best he said, and this was a long time ago,
Speaker 2: I think he said this. He said, the reason that
Speaker 2: there's so much hatred for Iran in the United States
Speaker 2: is because there's a bunch of writers in Hollywood who
Speaker 2: are Israeli and they hate Iran and they want the
Speaker 2: US to go to worth Iran. And they've been writing
Speaker 2: movies and TV shows and putting this into everything, that Iran, Iran, Iran, Iran,
Speaker 2: Iran is the enemy, and that's what people know. That's
Speaker 2: the what's because the American public doesn't know anything about
Speaker 2: Iran except what they're told. When you tell people they
Speaker 2: have Christian subway stations, that's fake news. No, it's real.
Speaker 2: They don't believe in Jesus there actually they do, in fact,
Speaker 2: considering that that place other than the people that practice
Speaker 2: some of the older Persian religions. Considering that place is
Speaker 2: I think per capita it's more Muslim than the US
Speaker 2: is Christian. They probably have more people that believe in
Speaker 2: Jesus and Iran, you know, if you fact of the population,
Speaker 2: than in the United States. So anyway, I might be
Speaker 2: digressing from the point, but I think that all of
Speaker 2: this is important too to observe.
Speaker 1: As far as jd Vance and his military contractor. I'm
Speaker 1: sure you know about that in the Peter Teel connection
Speaker 1: to drill Industries and how he made all of these
Speaker 1: surveillance drones. This company was apparently responsible for making all
Speaker 1: of these surveillance drones. And then now the DoD and
Speaker 1: the government is buying these surveillance aifacial recognition drones off
Speaker 1: of jd Vance's company.
Speaker 2: I would not be surprised if they saw him as president.
Speaker 1: Did you do a show on that? Did you know
Speaker 1: about that?
Speaker 2: I haven't done a full show in that, but I
Speaker 2: think I referenced it on my Palenteer show, one of
Speaker 2: my Palanteer shows. Yeah, he's he is a technocrat and
Speaker 2: he is what they're calling for. I mean even Nick
Speaker 2: Foyntes is calling for something similar. They want like a
Speaker 2: Christian monarchy or they want the techno monarchy of Peter Thiel,
Speaker 2: and J Vance is the He's the brainchild of a
Speaker 2: bunch of different corporations and psychopaths, and that's how he
Speaker 2: got to start too. So I got to start. He
Speaker 2: got to start with those people like Peter Teele. So
Speaker 2: he like the fighting over his wife being a Hindu,
Speaker 2: but not the fact that he got his start with
Speaker 2: Peter Tiel, the vampire antichrist, so called Christian. That's that's
Speaker 2: the kind of thing we've been talking about throughout the
Speaker 2: whole show. It's it's it's silly, it's stupid.
Speaker 1: Who thought that RFK was going to be the most
Speaker 1: least controversial person in this entire administration. It's unbelievable. We
Speaker 1: thought that he was going to go up there and
Speaker 1: do and and whip up all this stuff, and it was.
Speaker 1: It kind of seemed like it in the very beginning,
Speaker 1: because you remember whenever they were doing his like inaugural
Speaker 1: thing into the Health Administrator, and he was in front
Speaker 1: of Bernie Sanders and he was doing this whole thing,
Speaker 1: and then he called a Bernie Sanders were taking money
Speaker 1: from well week of dollars from all of these big
Speaker 1: pharma pharmaceutical companies and everything. That's how we thought it
Speaker 1: was going to go. But then it's just turned into
Speaker 1: a complete total shit show, is no other better way
Speaker 1: to put it.
Speaker 2: Everything's been rebranded writer, So Nick Shirley's helping the well
Speaker 2: Elon Musk first did. Now he's helping Nick Shirley to
Speaker 2: continue to rebrand X as an independent platform, as they
Speaker 2: signed contracts with foreign countries to censor x and to
Speaker 2: overflood it overfloat with bots. They've rebranded the New World
Speaker 2: Order as make America Great, which has no meaning. They've
Speaker 2: rebranded the idea of the Great Reset as or rather
Speaker 2: I should say, they've rebranded the Great Financial Reset as
Speaker 2: the Great Reset or vice versa, and now it's being
Speaker 2: rebranded as We're going to make America Great, which still
Speaker 2: has no meaning. And they've rebranded Conspiracy Land people that
Speaker 2: might have questions and opinions and provide good, good speaking
Speaker 2: platforms for people to get new ideas out there on
Speaker 2: the public airwaves, and now they've been reduced to I mean,
Speaker 2: my god. I used to list Alex Jones this for entertainment,
Speaker 2: just to get that in the background. And now, like
Speaker 2: when he's talking about eating his neighbor's ass, you know
Speaker 2: that was that was a funny bit. Now it's like
Speaker 2: Alex Jones is literally on his show saying we got
Speaker 2: to get the big companies into Venezuela to rebuild. It's
Speaker 2: like that's literally the economic hitman model that you used
Speaker 2: to expose on your show. Now you're literally promoting the
Speaker 2: economic Hitman model because I think people, well, in his case,
Speaker 2: I think he's compromised by those lawsuits that were used
Speaker 2: against him. But I think overall, what you're looking at
Speaker 2: is that people are too free to admit that they
Speaker 2: were wrong about Trump and about all of that stuff.
Speaker 2: Like my god, I don't know if you saw this writer,
Speaker 2: but the Department of Labor. Let me double check to
Speaker 2: make sure that's what it was. The US Department of Labor.
Speaker 2: They literally, I'm using that word very deliberately. They literally
Speaker 2: just posted on social media this week. Trust the plan.
Speaker 2: So it turns out that Clyde Lewis and I did
Speaker 2: a show in twenty fifteen sixteen about QAnon being fake
Speaker 2: not real. Turns out, even though we were called crazy,
Speaker 2: that's exactly what it was, fake, and it was used
Speaker 2: to identify the cell called Patriots, discredit the movement, rebrand everything.
Speaker 2: And now you get all the things that people like
Speaker 2: David Ike used to say, oh, he's crazy, how could
Speaker 2: you do that? Well, now we get yeah, either going
Speaker 2: to take your car away and you're gonna have you're
Speaker 2: not gonna be able to drive. Well, we're slowly doing
Speaker 2: that with electric cars and fifteen minute cities. That's how
Speaker 2: we get there. And who's Elon Musk? But he's a patriot,
Speaker 2: so it's okay. And Trump's you know, oh we pulled
Speaker 2: out of the UN, but he's giving talks. I think
Speaker 2: he's given to talk at Davos relatively soon. Oh, they
Speaker 2: can't buy single family homes, these big companies, nothing about
Speaker 2: shell companies doing that, are nothing about that. Will just
Speaker 2: blow up countries and we'll take all possession of all
Speaker 2: the land, and we'll build hotels and resorts. It's just
Speaker 2: one hypocritical, stupid thing after another, and too many people
Speaker 2: are unwilling to admit that they were con And I
Speaker 2: actually think, I actually think it's a brilliant and genius conspiracy.
Speaker 2: Quite frankly put it that way. I think what's happening
Speaker 2: is they have used all of this, and by day
Speaker 2: I mean big companies, I mean foreign countries, I mean
Speaker 2: the blackmailers, etc. They have used this rebranding, they have
Speaker 2: used the Trump image. They have used all of this
Speaker 2: to undermine the last bit of trust and faith in
Speaker 2: the American system. And the evidence of that is in
Speaker 2: the fact of the comeback story of Trump. He's going
Speaker 2: to do it all it's going to get better, We're
Speaker 2: going to make changes. He knows what he's doing this time, etc.
Speaker 2: And then he just did exactly what everybody else has
Speaker 2: always done. They don't release files, they lie about files,
Speaker 2: then don't release them, then lie about releasing them, and
Speaker 2: then redact things, and it's all confusing. And then we
Speaker 2: bomb other countries and we promote regime change, and social
Speaker 2: media is run by a bunch of bots now from
Speaker 2: the Conservatives and from Israel. That, by the way, that's
Speaker 2: a factual thing. The White House has a bot team
Speaker 2: running for Trump where they criticize if someone says, well,
Speaker 2: wait a minute, hold in a second, I don't think
Speaker 2: this makes any sense. Suddenly Trump bots pop up and
Speaker 2: they tell you why you're an an American loser and
Speaker 2: you might as well go to a communist country. So
Speaker 2: it's the same exact model, except I think it's been
Speaker 2: used to undermine the last bit of faith in the
Speaker 2: system because guess what, I really, frankly think no one
Speaker 2: is ever going to trust voting again. There was a
Speaker 2: little bit of it left, but no one's ever going
Speaker 2: to trust the let's put America first people again. You
Speaker 2: know who they're going to trust. They're going to trust
Speaker 2: people like mom Donnie, who's a lion psychopath who probably
Speaker 2: works for the macade. But he says things that sound
Speaker 2: a lot better than let's just make America great. He
Speaker 2: just says things that are total nonsense, like we're going
Speaker 2: to be free buses. And then he gets an office
Speaker 2: and the first thing he does, bus fair goes through
Speaker 2: the roof. So that's what you're going to get. You
Speaker 2: want to fight communism, you want to fight socialism, you
Speaker 2: don't fight it by supporting these kinds of policies and systems.
Speaker 2: In fact, what you're going to get out of that
Speaker 2: is you're going to get a system that is well,
Speaker 2: they want a techno monarchy, you're going to get a
Speaker 2: system very close to that. So anyway, I think that's
Speaker 2: what it's all about, undermining the last bit of faith
Speaker 2: in the system.
Speaker 1: I think that we need to elect JD. Vance. By
Speaker 1: the way, this Paul Valley League guy that we talked
Speaker 1: about in the very beginning was also a Q and
Speaker 1: On person. Down here in his bio says Q and On.
Speaker 1: Valley is a supporter of Q and On, which he
Speaker 1: has described as a white hat operation.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, military.
Speaker 1: Intelligence officers that has tied to the information a group
Speaker 1: of military intelligence specialists over eight hundred people that advise
Speaker 1: the president. He has praised Q as a legitimate, supposed
Speaker 1: source that releases real intelligence, fact based intelligence to the public.
Speaker 1: In twenty twenty, he was also one of the two
Speaker 1: hundred and thirty five senior military leaders backing Donald Trump
Speaker 1: for re election. So there you go. You got the
Speaker 1: PAULI of Valie here Q and on supporter. So I said,
Speaker 1: I would throw then in there since you mentioned a
Speaker 1: little c.
Speaker 4: E.
Speaker 2: Q has been nonsense from the beginning, and look how
Speaker 2: well it's worked to undermine real things. That's what it's
Speaker 2: what it's intention, Its purpose was from the beginning. I
Speaker 2: think that's what the Trump administration has been used for too,
Speaker 2: to undermine I guess I said, the last bit of
Speaker 2: faith in the system, and then we'll slowly replace all
Speaker 2: the things we agree or corrupt with things that are
Speaker 2: far worse, like JD. Vance and Peter Till's technocracy. That's
Speaker 2: okay though, Elon Musk, he's a good guy. He votes
Speaker 2: Republican now, so if he wants a new old order,
Speaker 2: that's okay.
Speaker 1: Well you will sometime I have to go back and
Speaker 1: revisit my JD vance Killing the Pope. Oh reading God,
Speaker 1: I did in an entire show on it.
Speaker 2: It's so stupid. Have you I know you've seen the
Speaker 2: X Files, but have you ever seen the Dreamland episode,
Speaker 2: the two part Dreamland episode or Malder in the areafty
Speaker 2: one guy switch bodies?
Speaker 1: Hmmm, I sounds familiar, but I couldn't recall any of it.
Speaker 2: It's such a good episode, two part episode, because the
Speaker 2: Area fifty one guy switches bodies with Malder and they
Speaker 2: go meet with the I think I've told you this before.
Speaker 2: They go meet with the Lone Gunman with Scollie, and
Speaker 2: they don't at first believe that it's it's not Malder
Speaker 2: because it looks like him, but it's got this other
Speaker 2: guy's personality. And he tells him. He's like, I can't
Speaker 2: believe you published this this conspiracy stuff in your newspapers.
Speaker 2: He's like, I make all this stuff up. You guys
Speaker 2: just publish this stuff that I make up. He's I
Speaker 2: made this up while I was on the toilet. That's
Speaker 2: what a lot of this QAnon stuff is. And it
Speaker 2: undermines real things, like they're not like you've probably seen
Speaker 2: those real quickly. You've seen those stories about you know,
Speaker 2: Pat cash Betel and he'll say, you know, we under
Speaker 2: well he's got those giant eyes. You know, we under
Speaker 2: we were able to get in there and save one
Speaker 2: hundred kids in one of these rings. It's like, well,
Speaker 2: that's great cash, But how about the Epstein thing. How
Speaker 2: about that that's a lot bigger than one hundred kids.
Speaker 2: But no, they give you a little crumb. Oh, here's
Speaker 2: a little bit, and then the big one that just
Speaker 2: gets kind of ignored or forgotten about. And that's and
Speaker 2: that's also meant to I mean, while they've been telling
Speaker 2: us that there's nothing there, but here's a real one.
Speaker 2: Here's a real network. Some low level people that are
Speaker 2: involved in like trading pictures online. The big people don't
Speaker 2: get don't get persecuted, prosecuted, arrested, investigated anything. They just
Speaker 2: skipped to go along with their Like Bongino, did you
Speaker 2: see that? He's like, I want to go by by
Speaker 2: podcast and it's so disgusting what I saw in the government.
Speaker 2: So what was like holding a second, This sums it
Speaker 2: all uprighter. So Dan Bongino, who was actually in a
Speaker 2: position of power and could do something about it, decided
Speaker 2: to not do anything, leave, get on a podcast and
Speaker 2: then tell people it was just really bad and I'm
Speaker 2: going to change it now with my pie. Now now
Speaker 2: now that I know we're going to change things on
Speaker 2: my podcast, It's like, why don't you do something when
Speaker 2: you're in the government. Now you're gonna now're gonna do
Speaker 2: something in a podcast. It's so stupid. It's so stupid.
Speaker 2: I have no hope.
Speaker 1: That's where that's where the minds of the people are.
Speaker 1: Like that mister Ba's video that we did with the
Speaker 1: Rockefeller Foundation. We got to meet the people where they are.
Speaker 1: We got to meet the kids where they are, Ryan
Speaker 1: and where are the kids Ryan? The kids are online?
Speaker 2: Yep, that's you're right, that's a good point. Meet people
Speaker 2: where they are online. Just convince people that it's it's
Speaker 2: all okay. Trust the plan. I mean, my god, how
Speaker 2: long do you have to trust the plan? It's been
Speaker 2: what twelve years? Eleven? Twelve years? How long you got to trusted.
Speaker 1: Plunell not Thatt one eight? I think.
Speaker 2: More than it's been. At least it's been at least
Speaker 2: eight years, because it was like twenty sixteen, right, so
Speaker 2: maybe like eight nine years something like that. But yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: that's a long time to trust the plan. I mean
Speaker 2: people are going to start retiring still trusting the plans.
Speaker 2: It's very stupid, very stupid.
Speaker 1: Well, trust the plan to the day I die, Ryan, None,
Speaker 1: you're going to tell me that, tell me not to
Speaker 1: trust the plan. I'll trust to play anything. I want
Speaker 1: to trust the plan.
Speaker 2: I don't even know what that means. Let me ask
Speaker 2: you a question real quick before before we wrap up.
Speaker 2: What is this black pill thing? People keep accusing me
Speaker 2: of being a black pillar. I don't even know what
Speaker 2: it means. What does it mean?
Speaker 1: It means you basically have no hope and that everything
Speaker 1: is fake and stupid and nothing's real and none of
Speaker 1: it really matters, and we're going to get a new
Speaker 1: world order regardless, and everything's going to be surveillance and
Speaker 1: it's pretty much like a Wie Downer, no hope type
Speaker 1: of person. But I don't see you as that. I
Speaker 1: see you as a realist. Like you look at things,
Speaker 1: you analyze them, and then you come up with your
Speaker 1: best conclusion based on the information that you have, and
Speaker 1: everything that we get is so backwards. So it's like
Speaker 1: you know, probably throwing in some comedy would be like,
Speaker 1: they would never call you a black pillar then, because
Speaker 1: then you make jokes, you know what I mean, You're
Speaker 1: a jokester. Kim Doe is a black pillar, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean. But he's funny, so then it doesn't
Speaker 1: really matter, you know, at that point, he's not you
Speaker 1: know what I mean?
Speaker 2: Yeah, kind of, I guess I get that. I've had
Speaker 2: people give me different definitions. I don't just those things
Speaker 2: are so silly to me because, like I'll say, and
Speaker 2: I don't really trust this all your so you're one
Speaker 2: of those black pillars. I don't know. I just I
Speaker 2: don't know what that means. It's like you're speaking another language.
Speaker 2: If you want to, if you want to have a discussion,
Speaker 2: we'll discuss the details. It's just another way to label
Speaker 2: somebody and not actually have to discuss the issue at
Speaker 2: hand or to debate something. It's just like calling someone
Speaker 2: a truther or a libtard or a they got Trump
Speaker 2: derangement syndrome. I just think all those things are stupid.
Speaker 2: None of it gets us anywhere, None of it gets
Speaker 2: us to a better understanding of anything.
Speaker 1: I would agree with that I would agree with that. Absolutely,
Speaker 1: and Ryan, thanks so much for coming on. Brother, really
Speaker 1: appreciate it. Always fun having you on. We're gonna do
Speaker 1: it again. Hopefully we'll get that Super Bowl show in
Speaker 1: like we did last year the day right after, because
Speaker 1: I do normally do these on Mondays.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I was wondering I might actually be hosting.
Speaker 2: I don't know if I'm going to be hosting Ground
Speaker 2: zero for the super Bowl show if Clyde's not back,
Speaker 2: so I might have to do triple duty for that
Speaker 2: my show, your show in round Zeeros. I look forward
Speaker 2: to it.
Speaker 1: We got to make the tradition because.
Speaker 2: I have a prediction.
Speaker 1: Sure, Oh yeah, okay, let's hear it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, one of the NFL teams is going to win
Speaker 2: the super Bowl. It's my prediction.
Speaker 1: You heard it here first, folks. You heard it here
Speaker 1: on Raze by Jane's prediction from Brian Gable. We will
Speaker 1: check it out in about a month and.
Speaker 2: A half and they will have colors, their logo will
Speaker 2: have colors.
Speaker 1: But what will those callers signify? Will the callers tell
Speaker 1: us who's going to win?
Speaker 2: It'll signify Illuminati confirmed. You know, it's really getting to
Speaker 2: the point where I've been drinking this tea on air. Here,
Speaker 2: I got this tea. It's a a black soybean tea.
Speaker 2: It's getting to the point now where if I were
Speaker 2: to drink this on my show and not put it
Speaker 2: in a cup, people would look at the bottle and
Speaker 2: be like, what kind of illumine nati symbols are those?
Speaker 2: So they're not illuminai symbols. It's Chinese script for black tea.
Speaker 2: And it's like that with my book collection, you know,
Speaker 2: people look at oh, oh, that's an Illuminati book right there. No,
Speaker 2: that's just a Free Masonic Bible. People have really, I
Speaker 2: think been and it's the QAnon stuff writer. I think
Speaker 2: people have been so they don't trust anything understandably, and
Speaker 2: then they've be given this hope of like we're going
Speaker 2: to get the truth, and that's just another psych job.
Speaker 2: It's just another psychop you know what.
Speaker 1: I think. I think that it would be better if
Speaker 1: people would read the Free Masonic Bible. Just in the
Speaker 1: introduction alone the Bible to the Free Masonic Bible is
Speaker 1: explains more of the Bible than the than the Bible does.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Actually, the Free Masonic Bible, it has a description
Speaker 2: of what all the different symbols mean in freemasonry, and
Speaker 2: here's a hint. None of them are about the Illuminati.
Speaker 2: I've read it.
Speaker 1: Met too well. I've read part of it. I read
Speaker 1: a lot of it.
Speaker 2: Very interesting, Yes it is. I would recommend reading all
Speaker 2: as many books as you can get your hands on.
Speaker 2: Read the skim through it. The Bag of a Gita
Speaker 2: is huge, But read the bag of Agita. I don't
Speaker 2: know read the Quran. I wouldn't read that that heathen document. Well, then,
Speaker 2: how do you know what's in it? I just know God,
Speaker 2: God told me. I know God. God said it.
Speaker 1: God said it because it's for what demons and they
Speaker 1: work for the globals. CA.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you're a globals agent. Globalist agent has turned into
Speaker 2: like a deep state, hasn't it, And like deep state
Speaker 2: is transforming into something else now. It's kind of all
Speaker 2: there's like so many rebranding things happening. It feels like.
Speaker 1: You're a globalist agent working for the Intel community. Ryan.
Speaker 2: But I know that somebody's gonna win gu blest agent
Speaker 2: on this show. But I know that someone's gonna win
Speaker 2: the super Bowl this year. That's the prediction.
Speaker 1: And there's going to be a halftime performance and the
Speaker 1: very nutstay. The entire internet will be filled full of
Speaker 1: Super Bowl decodes that I can promise in my chambel,
Speaker 1: you're a channel around zero will be one of.
Speaker 2: Them super Bowl decodes. And you know another thing about
Speaker 2: that is that when you look at sports, Yeah, I've
Speaker 2: never paid attention to, like to football really in my
Speaker 2: at all of my adult life. And people, you know,
Speaker 2: they do those zoom in videos and oh, yeah he
Speaker 2: was you can tell here that he didn't know if
Speaker 2: he could score, if he was allowed to score a touchdown,
Speaker 2: or this or that, like ninety nine percent that's implied
Speaker 2: some of it. I yeah, I'd imagine that it's pretty rigged,
Speaker 2: and there's a lot of gambling and a lot of
Speaker 2: money invested in all that stuff. But I don't think
Speaker 2: everything is is completely rigged. If it was that obviously rigged,
Speaker 2: then I'm pretty sure it would have been exposed a
Speaker 2: lot longer ago, and not just recently when you got X.
Speaker 2: There's a lot of genuine paranoia. There's a lot of that,
Speaker 2: a lot of genuine paranoia, a lot of genuine schizophrenia.
Speaker 2: Because the schizophrenics now are they're allowed to talk. They
Speaker 2: got microphones and they can say whatever they want to say,
Speaker 2: like you're.
Speaker 1: A global st agent, global st agent, globalist agent, you're
Speaker 1: global and you're infested by demons. You're demonic, you're possessed.
Speaker 2: You know what somebody's I think. I told you. I
Speaker 2: told you that story that somebody was talking about on
Speaker 2: a show I called into. They were talking about the
Speaker 2: how Jesus can dispel the name of demons, or it
Speaker 2: can like or not the name of demons, The name
Speaker 2: of Jesus can dispel evil, exercise demons. And I said, well,
Speaker 2: that's interesting because in Arab nations, Arab cultures, they use
Speaker 2: a law and that also gets rid of the gin.
Speaker 2: How do you explain that? I don't know, I got Christ? Well, okay,
Speaker 2: you got Christ. That's cool. But like they use a
Speaker 2: different word, and it also works because a law means
Speaker 2: the same thing as Jesus. Actually, a law is closer
Speaker 2: to God than Jesus because Jesus is a derivative of
Speaker 2: Yeshuah and a law is the direct name for God.
Speaker 2: All the law's a demon? Well, then why does the
Speaker 2: name Allah get rid of the gin? It's very very frustrating, writer, It.
Speaker 1: Is very frustrating, and we could probably talk about this
Speaker 1: for another two or three hours. Some of our phone
Speaker 1: conversations go on for a long time, and I'm wick
Speaker 1: some of those would be recorded because they're freaking incredible.
Speaker 1: But really appreciate this children, laid back, relaxed episode with you, brother.
Speaker 1: I'm looking forward to the Super Bowl show. Hopefully we
Speaker 1: can make We're going to make that a tradition from
Speaker 1: here forward, since we did it last year and it
Speaker 1: was highly successful last year because we both stayed up
Speaker 1: watched it and did all of our analysis on it
Speaker 1: late that night and woke up the next morning and
Speaker 1: did all the shows on it. Can you let people
Speaker 1: know where they can find you online?
Speaker 2: Yet? Pretty simple? T ST radio dot info, TST radio
Speaker 2: dot info or type in TST radio and pretty much
Speaker 2: any radio podcast player, Spotify, Apple, et cetera. All my shows,
Speaker 2: subscription Arcive, my books, etc. It's all there, pretty simple,
Speaker 2: TST radio dot I in f O, thanks so much.
Speaker 1: Links to Brian's information is in the description of this video,
Speaker 1: and for everyone else, all of my information is also
Speaker 1: in the description. Please be sure to like subscribe to
Speaker 1: the belt icon as well for notifications and we'll see
Speaker 1: you guys next time.