Speaker 1: Right now. Supposedly, Warner Bros. Wants to make Barbie two.
Speaker 1: Obviously Barbi one massive hit, right that summer billion dollar movie,
Speaker 1: So you want to make that. Greta, Margot, Robbie Ryan
Speaker 1: Goslin Are like, yeah, we're on board. Warner Bros. Is
Speaker 1: like great, But then apparently when they come to the
Speaker 1: money side, Greta, Gosling and Robbie, they want a lot
Speaker 1: of money. No, Dot, it's a billion dollar movies and
Speaker 1: as of right now, Warner Bros. Says, Hey, we don't
Speaker 1: want to pay that, And Greta's like, hey, I even
Speaker 1: got like it sounds like she's writing a script or
Speaker 1: has a script like, hey, we could get this to go.
Speaker 1: We will be good to go. He's gonna say the word,
Speaker 1: and I guess Zazov says he felt like the price
Speaker 1: they were all asked for was too egregious. But here's
Speaker 1: the monkey wrench tailor is. I guess If by December
Speaker 1: Warner Brothers does not pay them and decide to make
Speaker 1: a sequel to Barbie two, Mattel is gonna take the
Speaker 1: rights away from Warner Bros. And go to a different
Speaker 1: studio and reboot Barbie. So Ossie wouldn't be with Margot
Speaker 1: and all that, but they would just make a new
Speaker 1: Barbie film. What do you do if you're David zas
Speaker 1: Off in this situation, tam Do you give people this
Speaker 1: big money and hopefully strike lightning like lightning strikes twice
Speaker 1: in the same place, or do you just go, you
Speaker 1: know what, we don't want another Joker Too situation where
Speaker 1: the first minute billion, this doesn't that's wipe our hands?
Speaker 1: What do you do? Taylor?
Speaker 2: The Joker Too situation is the first thing that comes
Speaker 2: to my mind. It's such a good example, and I
Speaker 2: mean you have to be cautious of that outcome for sure,
Speaker 2: because what was the ian What was the budget for
Speaker 2: Joker Too? All?
Speaker 1: So much more money that the same thing, because Gaga,
Speaker 1: Phillips and Walking all got big pay raises versus the
Speaker 1: first one, right, so it sounds like that would happen here,
Speaker 1: which again, you could make that case of it. It
Speaker 1: was a billion dollar thing, right, so you can say, hey,
Speaker 1: we want to come back because we made it in
Speaker 1: this huge it could be a franchise, but you need
Speaker 1: us back, right So.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, that's right.
Speaker 1: So you're on the camp. So you're on the camp
Speaker 1: of for sure, No, for sure, No, then I but
Speaker 1: some matel takes that franchise, they go somewhere else in
Speaker 1: that movie is almost like close to a billion again, right,
Speaker 1: it's not grand then, but what if it's just like
Speaker 1: people want to see Barbie because like I could argue
Speaker 1: that Barbie that's a great summer movie, right, you market
Speaker 1: it right? It has that vibe of beach and fun time,
Speaker 1: pretty colors. Do you look like the idea goes somewhere
Speaker 1: else makes a bunch of money. It's like, hey, you
Speaker 1: let Barbie go? We could have had that, you know, m.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean your place. It is a rock on
Speaker 2: our place. I think it's because I was thinking about
Speaker 2: this earlier too. I I don't think it's gonna do
Speaker 2: as good as the first one. And I do think
Speaker 2: though that because a good comparison might be the Lego Movie.
Speaker 2: And I think about it, Yeah, because Lego Movie two.
Speaker 2: What did that do compared to the first one? Because
Speaker 2: the first Legle movie did pretty well, but that second
Speaker 2: one didn't.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think it did so bad. It's so underwhelming
Speaker 1: that that kind of killed those those movies. You know, Yes,
Speaker 1: what is it like? But then can you not look
Speaker 1: at because someone not say like, oh, Barbie could be
Speaker 1: like a superhero brand, where like the Spider Man movies. Look,
Speaker 1: spider Man Far from Home comes and then knowing home
Speaker 1: is bigger, No Way Home, and then brand New Day
Speaker 1: is bigger. Right, It's not the exact same, but there
Speaker 1: are situations where there's movies that make a billion and
Speaker 1: they can Dark Knight, Dark Knight Rises right again, superhero stuff.
Speaker 1: But they could say, I think Barbie is like a
Speaker 1: superhero project but for females, right in that sort of sense,
Speaker 1: like big ip, big characters, big world. So you could
Speaker 1: make that case that we could be the female superhero
Speaker 1: or like Taylor was product. Right, the second one comes
Speaker 1: out massive compared to.
Speaker 3: The first, right, No, just under seven hundred.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and also there was some time but you could
Speaker 1: see them in that board. We're making that pitch for
Speaker 1: Barbie two, being like we could be the next product too,
Speaker 1: it could be even bigger. Right, what did you like
Speaker 1: a movie to make?
Speaker 2: So the first one made a wonderful was it worldwide?
Speaker 2: Four hundred and sixty eight million?
Speaker 1: It wasn't the second like three hundred something or under
Speaker 1: three hundred.
Speaker 2: The second one points.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, yeah, that's why those things stopped.
Speaker 2: I feel like that's a Barbie situation. Although oh once,
Speaker 2: this all though, so.
Speaker 3: Lego Batman movie.
Speaker 1: Is how we keep Taylor awake. He's looking at stats.
Speaker 1: I haven't seen him so awaking.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so yeah, Sony came out in twenty seventeen.
Speaker 1: Stuff, what never any storied part two make Taylor?
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, well the Batman came out between Lego Movie
Speaker 2: one and two's and that did all right?
Speaker 1: Didn't that do like three hundred something? Or did that
Speaker 1: did two hundreds? Actually, like I thought, Lego Batman two
Speaker 1: did a lot less than we all thought I was
Speaker 1: gonna do, especially with the great reviews and twelve million.
Speaker 1: Yeah three, that's what I thought. It was like three
Speaker 1: hundred something, so yeah, which again not bad, but they
Speaker 1: were definitely going down, right.
Speaker 3: And they were trending down.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think I'm with you. I guess for me,
Speaker 1: it just has to like, let me see now, I'm
Speaker 1: look at my stats here, Barbie budget, I just gotta
Speaker 1: see the budget that first movie is right, because if
Speaker 1: it's a situation, so even then right, like the budget
Speaker 1: of the first movie one one forty five, that's not
Speaker 1: crazy for like how good the movie looked, and for
Speaker 1: those stars that they had in it, I would have like,
Speaker 1: I would really have to know how big. And that's
Speaker 1: the rumored quote is that they they want egregious raises, right,
Speaker 1: but I'd have to know how big I think. I
Speaker 1: know this might sound crazy, but I think if they
Speaker 1: even got up to two fifty, right, so another one
Speaker 1: hundred million more, I might Taylor where I don't think
Speaker 1: Barbie two would do as good as one. I think,
Speaker 1: you know, there was the Barbenheimer. I think the magic
Speaker 1: of the first one helps elevate it. But I don't
Speaker 1: think it would be like Joker too or I don't
Speaker 1: think it would bomb. Barbi two I think would still
Speaker 1: be a success. I think it could still be in
Speaker 1: that like six hundred and eight hundred million if done,
Speaker 1: if good, if it's a ship storm, then yeah, but
Speaker 1: I think it could still be hit, especially make sure
Speaker 1: it's in the summer. So that's where it's like, even
Speaker 1: if you go to two fifty, what you gonna make
Speaker 1: five hundred? Like, I do you think a Barbie film
Speaker 1: could make five hundred million? Taylor Barbie two, ooh, really
Speaker 1: think five or a million?
Speaker 2: I think it is and that's just because the damage
Speaker 2: up again Lego movie and then Joker too, but.
Speaker 1: Then I gave you The Spider Man Far from Home,
Speaker 1: Dark Knight Rises. Yeah.
Speaker 3: But for me, the way I had canonate is.
Speaker 2: This movie just kind of falls in line with those
Speaker 2: other ones before at that where sequels just don't seem
Speaker 2: to take off. And if it does, I mean I'll
Speaker 2: chew my words, but I just don't necessarily see the Well, look.
Speaker 1: It's not a sequel. But like I think you mean
Speaker 1: were on Lyne, we didn't think out he's gonna make
Speaker 1: a billion, It's gonna make a billion, right. We thought
Speaker 1: I was gonna do less than Alpenheimer and that's gonna
Speaker 1: Now it's projected Taylor to make one point four to
Speaker 1: one point five, not even just one billion, like almost
Speaker 1: like half a two billion. So it's just like you
Speaker 1: never know. So I'm in the camp I'm against say that.
Speaker 1: I think it could make five hundred. It's just a
Speaker 1: question of what the goal is and I same thing,
Speaker 1: what do you think makes more money? Taylor? The Barbie
Speaker 1: two movie with Gossing, Robbie and Grete back as director
Speaker 1: or Mattel rebooting at a different studio.
Speaker 3: Who rebooting a different studio.
Speaker 1: What I still go with the sequel because I just
Speaker 1: feel like people, especially Grian Gossling as Ken, I feel
Speaker 1: like people want more of that, where like you have
Speaker 1: to what if you go to another studio and you
Speaker 1: get a bunch of new actors and it's like, oh,
Speaker 1: like like Robbie's not back. It feels like one of
Speaker 1: those like trait to DVD sequels back in the day
Speaker 1: where they don't have all the original actors back. Right,
Speaker 1: But do you think a reboot would do better than
Speaker 1: a two?
Speaker 3: I feel like it could.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I know it's bold, it's bold, but I do
Speaker 2: feel like it it could.
Speaker 1: Huh. Okay, I'm gonna I'm gonna have to maybe make
Speaker 1: a discord poll at some point, so I'm in there.
Speaker 1: Now here's the question. Now, I asked you what you
Speaker 1: think what you would do? What do you think Warner
Speaker 1: brother does? Like, what do you think they decide? Do
Speaker 1: you think they cough up and pay the money or
Speaker 1: do the think they stand back and say we're not
Speaker 1: going to do it. They got till December de side,
Speaker 1: oh cough of the money? I think so too, Especially
Speaker 1: right now, we haven't talked about much that Paramount deal
Speaker 1: got blocked. It could still happen, but I'm not sure
Speaker 1: if you saw this Taylor, where like I can't remember
Speaker 1: what it oh, I can't remember what it is, so
Speaker 1: like it gets blocked and I think they have something
Speaker 1: like in the Fall to figure it out, and then
Speaker 1: what happens if they don't figure out on the Fall
Speaker 1: gets kicked to like April whatever, and it's something like
Speaker 1: almost every quarter Paramount has to pay Warner Brothers like
Speaker 1: two to three billion dollars because they're like the day
Speaker 1: the deal has been delayed, It's like if this lawsuit
Speaker 1: doesn't get settled, they just gn't get sending money to them.
Speaker 1: So like Paramoun could be like blean out a bunch
Speaker 1: of money. They got a lot of Britchi people are fine,
Speaker 1: but I just think if you're Warner Bros. You gotta operate.
Speaker 1: Let's say Paramount doesn't buy us, right, we're not combining
Speaker 1: those other franchises. I think Barbie is a franchise, and
Speaker 1: I think you call up the money to take a risk. Now, granted,
Speaker 1: I was the same idiot that said about Joker too
Speaker 1: to walk it back, though I never thought Joker two
Speaker 1: was gonna get that, like those budgets were gonna go
Speaker 1: so raised, right. I thought it was gonna be relatively same.
Speaker 1: It's like, oh the bombs whatever, You're fine, that did bomb.
Speaker 1: So I was somebody that said I don't take the risk.
Speaker 1: I still think Barbie two is way more accessible than
Speaker 1: Joker too, So I still think they call of the
Speaker 1: money and do it. I guess we'll find out in December.
Speaker 1: And then our last topic, speaking about Warner Brothers, this
Speaker 1: weird story. So Tay, sit with me now, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: read you something. So Austin, a couple of weeks ago,
Speaker 1: we heard, hey night elm Street. Fine, the Cravens have
Speaker 1: sold it to Paramount, and I thought that was it.
Speaker 1: But I don't know what happened here, so never blah
Speaker 1: blah blah. A report late Thursday night from Puck News
Speaker 1: says that not only is Paramount trying to get a
Speaker 1: new film out the ground, but Warner Bros. Is also
Speaker 1: developing a project, which is interesting because they're buying them,
Speaker 1: so you would think that they would just like pause
Speaker 1: and like let's figure this out after right, But the
Speaker 1: Paramount project was revealed a few days ago, and as
Speaker 1: reportedly based off the original script by Wes Craven. Now
Speaker 1: Warner Brothers project has detailed, with Lee Cronin attached to direct.
Speaker 1: Lee Cronan did The Mummy and he did Evil Dead
Speaker 1: Rise if you remember that name. Warner Bros. Holds the
Speaker 1: international rights for nightmar elm Street and would look to
Speaker 1: release the film internationally, with Paramount handing the domestic distribution
Speaker 1: for the complicating the manners Paramount's deal to buy Warner Brothers.
Speaker 1: Surely if this goes through, only one of these films
Speaker 1: would be made. Let's see. And here's where it gets weird.
Speaker 1: Sources with knowledge of the matter. I think Paramount figured
Speaker 1: by the time their movie got underway that Warner deal
Speaker 1: would have been closing. Warriors would have been compelled to
Speaker 1: release the Paramount version overseas, but Warners Michael de Luke
Speaker 1: and Pama Abley didn't care for that plan. Now they're
Speaker 1: looking to make their own movie, which they can only
Speaker 1: distribute overseas, and our talks to with Lee Cronin to
Speaker 1: produce Brange. So this is so fucking weird. So I
Speaker 1: guess Warner Bros. Has the right to Nightmare on Eland
Speaker 1: Street non Canada in America, So They're like, we're gonna
Speaker 1: make this film and release it overseas where Paramount has
Speaker 1: the domestic distribution right, so they'll release it here. So
Speaker 1: I guess Paramount was like, hey, we're buying you, so
Speaker 1: don't make that movie. Let's just get together. We're gonna
Speaker 1: make one movie. And Warner Brothers people running there like
Speaker 1: that world still gonna make this international one. And then
Speaker 1: the other thing that was super weird they didn't have
Speaker 1: in this article, but apparently the Paramount version. I don't
Speaker 1: think this is gonna be true, but the rumor was
Speaker 1: that it was a uh, it was gonna be based
Speaker 1: off the original script, and it was gonna be like
Speaker 1: a shot for shot remake of the original Nightmare on
Speaker 1: Elm Street, where the new one with or the Warner Bros.
Speaker 1: One was gonna be like just like new, like a reboot.
Speaker 1: So what do you think? Obviously it's a mess. I
Speaker 1: don't know if it's gonna happen. I think they'll figure
Speaker 1: that all out. But if I think, I know your answer.
Speaker 1: But if you're looking at the shot for shot remake
Speaker 1: or the reboot, which way are you going with Taylor?
Speaker 2: Oh my gosh, probably the shot for shot remake. What
Speaker 2: the fuck are You're pulling the opposites here?
Speaker 1: You're joking? Are you fucking kidding me? H? Isn't that right?
Speaker 3: How brother? They're they are going out of their way
Speaker 3: to fuck me.
Speaker 2: Oh fuck, I feel like it's safe, and I feel
Speaker 2: like that's exactly what they want to do with this character.
Speaker 2: I think that it's it's it's just.
Speaker 1: A twenty ten one was kind of a it was
Speaker 1: a shot for shot, but it was a remake where
Speaker 1: I had a lot of similar scenes and story beats.
Speaker 2: Though true, and again I haven't seen all of them,
Speaker 2: so I don't know all and any of them from
Speaker 2: that original.
Speaker 1: But you even do the retro now that this is
Speaker 1: actually happening, you know? Yeah?
Speaker 2: No, I do think though that a shot for shot
Speaker 2: remake is just gonna be safe in their books, and
Speaker 2: I feel like they don't have the balls to something
Speaker 2: else that's a little more improvised, right.
Speaker 1: So yeah, do you think that there is any so? Like, Okay,
Speaker 1: I guess I'll say I'll ask this question after I
Speaker 1: I don't want to at all because I want them
Speaker 1: to do something new. I think that twenty ten one
Speaker 1: scarred me, especially there's a shot the classic one of
Speaker 1: Freddy pushing his head through the wall in the twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one at CGI and he's just run around like
Speaker 1: it does all the original stuff, but worse in my opinion,
Speaker 1: any of you're gonna remake it, sure, but a shot
Speaker 1: for shot remake to have it like identical to the
Speaker 1: old one but just updated, to me, is asking for
Speaker 1: a lot of trouble. Shot for shot remakes really don't
Speaker 1: usually work, especially if they gotta be like really old
Speaker 1: and like I still't think this is old enough to do.
Speaker 3: That, but it's obscure enough.
Speaker 2: Wow, No, because I mean it's obscure generation for a
Speaker 2: certain generation. Yeah, when I grew up, it was Michael
Speaker 2: Myers and it was Jason Vorhees and Chucky. Yeah, so
Speaker 2: I mean Freddy Krueger was just kind of on the
Speaker 2: back burner for my childhood, right.
Speaker 1: I guess. Yeah, it's weird because I'm surprised you didn't
Speaker 1: see those because like I had Chucky, but I had
Speaker 1: Freddy in there as well, you know, so I don't
Speaker 1: know why. I don't know where you missed out there,
Speaker 1: But that's right, Yeah, I very much hope this happens. Well,
Speaker 1: maybe two of them happen. But like, I want the
Speaker 1: new take, whether it's remaking another one, I want to
Speaker 1: full just this is our Freddy, We're doing something different.
Speaker 1: Don't care, change orge of it, don't care if it's
Speaker 1: a female this time, doesn't matter. I just don't. I
Speaker 1: just don't think the shot for shot remake. Now. Granted, yes,
Speaker 1: there is a whole new audience that might seem like
Speaker 1: oh great, But and I hope that's just like an exaggeration.
Speaker 1: I hope it's just a remake. I don't want a
Speaker 1: shot for shot because I do think there's a chances
Speaker 1: that that movie looks worse. So, Austie, I'm in the paramouna,
Speaker 1: in the Warner Brothers camp of doing something new. I
Speaker 1: guess I didn't ask you about that. How would you
Speaker 1: feel about Lee Cron And obviously you stidn't seen The
Speaker 1: Mummy yet?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: No? You sure? I think that's up your bandwig. But
Speaker 1: obviously after COVID we saw they released a bunch of movies.
Speaker 1: You saw a nightmareland Street, so you've only seen the one.
Speaker 1: But do you think Lee Krohne for Evil to Rise
Speaker 1: would be a good fit for this?
Speaker 2: Well, that just means it's gonna be a movie in
Speaker 2: the cinematic universe of people dead, right.
Speaker 1: Oh he better not better not touch upon it. No,
Speaker 1: you better not. That's only up for Sam to side.
Speaker 1: But as a what you see from Eel that Rise,
Speaker 1: do you look at them and be like, oh, this
Speaker 1: guy could make like a Freddy movie that's about dreams
Speaker 1: and that kind of stuff.
Speaker 3: Hmmm hmm, Yeah, I mean not again.
Speaker 2: I haven't seen The Mummy, but from what I've seen
Speaker 2: from trailers, it feels like there's a lot of that
Speaker 2: kind of mental fuckery that the skuy Lee could could tackle.
Speaker 3: For sure.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think. Uh, obviously, I can't remember all my
Speaker 1: lists I looked up. I did delete it if you
Speaker 1: guys want to go back, if you're Freddy fans as well.
Speaker 1: A last month they did trest told you where I
Speaker 1: listed my top ten choices for actor and directors. Lee
Speaker 1: didn't quite get on there because I need to see
Speaker 1: more because I loved Rise. I did enjoy The Mummy,
Speaker 1: I think more than other people, but I wasn't like
Speaker 1: blown away by it as many people said. It did
Speaker 1: feel like Egle Dead Light, so I would want to
Speaker 1: see one more. But he's also not a name where
Speaker 1: I'm like, oh fuck, Like I'm like, okay, I got
Speaker 1: more faith. And what he did with Rise and what
Speaker 1: he did with Alissa Sutherland is I can't owe Ellie
Speaker 1: he I think he can show that he's tackled like
Speaker 1: a good villain, right, And I think that's a big
Speaker 1: thing even the Mummy did at some point. So I
Speaker 1: like that. Now my last question for this, and yeah,
Speaker 1: I want this version to do you think there's so
Speaker 1: I guess it all depends on the merger, right, But
Speaker 1: the thing is with this merger, I says blocked. I
Speaker 1: think it could still very much happen, but it could
Speaker 1: get Instead of it being closed like this summer, it
Speaker 1: could be not closed all the way to April twenty
Speaker 1: twenty seven, and even then it could be further because
Speaker 1: the rumor is like they want that to be the
Speaker 1: trial state for all these like anti trust laws and stuff.
Speaker 1: So if the trial starts in April, that means it
Speaker 1: could be a little while before it closes. So let's
Speaker 1: say we're in some weird situation where it takes a
Speaker 1: while or it doesn't close. Do you think this could
Speaker 1: work where Warner Brothers releases a Freddy movie but it's
Speaker 1: just overseas. And then Paramount releases the domestic movie, which
Speaker 1: is weird because that means does that mean I'm gonna
Speaker 1: find a way, But I guess that would mean like
Speaker 1: the that the Warner Bros. Won, Like I'll read while
Speaker 1: you're talking about, I think that would mean like we
Speaker 1: wouldn't get a theatrical release of the Freddy Kruger movie
Speaker 1: like by Warner Brothers, like the Lee Crohnin one.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's that's weird, and I don't think I've ever
Speaker 2: heard of a I mean, I have as movies done
Speaker 2: that before. I mean, obviously it'd be two different versions.
Speaker 2: But that's just that's very very weird.
Speaker 1: Yeah, because yeah, Paramount got the domestic one, and Warner
Speaker 1: Brothers controls the franchise international distribution rights.
Speaker 3: To get partner up then right.
Speaker 1: No, because Warner Brothers could just say we're well, you'd
Speaker 1: have to partner with somebody, right, Because remember that's the
Speaker 1: reason Marvel can't do when you ask about weird stuff.
Speaker 1: They can't do a soul Halt because the Universal has
Speaker 1: the distribution rights to it, so they don't have to
Speaker 1: make a Hulk movie. But it's like if anyone makes
Speaker 1: a whole movie, you got to release it through us,
Speaker 1: So there is some weird things and even though it's
Speaker 1: not the exact same, remember that's weird shit where some
Speaker 1: people own Jason Voorhies and some people own Friday thirteenth,
Speaker 1: So like some of these fucking horror icons has some
Speaker 1: weird stuff going on. So like, do you think it's
Speaker 1: possibility where we get like two Freddy Kruger movies and
Speaker 1: one's domestic only and then one's international.
Speaker 2: I mean, after how you explained it, yeah, I could
Speaker 2: kind of, I could potentially see it happening, but again
Speaker 2: I've I have no recent memory of this being an
Speaker 2: actual thing anywhere else.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I just wonder, for I wonder what the finances
Speaker 1: are for both of them, right, because if it's like Paramount,
Speaker 1: you can do okay just Canada and America, but then
Speaker 1: you miss out everywhere else, right, So like I feel
Speaker 1: like an even warnable the same thing. You can go
Speaker 1: everywhere else but North America. I imagine once against the
Speaker 1: Blu ray DVD, it can go everywhere, So maybe they
Speaker 1: would think like we could make money there and on
Speaker 1: vod and stuff. But then I feel like, don't you
Speaker 1: feel like the budget has to be a lot lower
Speaker 1: for both of them. If like you take out for
Speaker 1: sure as markets and it's just like and it's tough
Speaker 1: because I'm like, you should combine the films, just figure
Speaker 1: it out. But then it also if they both don't agree.
Speaker 1: If if Paramants heavy and like, hey, we want to
Speaker 1: remake this and Warner Brothers teams like we want to
Speaker 1: like reboot it, and they can't agree. I don't know.
Speaker 1: At the end of the day, it would be very
Speaker 1: funny for myself, who's not got a movie since twenty ten.
Speaker 1: And then if I were to get two movies, because like,
Speaker 1: I don't care, I will find a way to see
Speaker 1: that international Freddy Kruger movie. I even if I pay,
Speaker 1: I will pay for it. If it's on vody sure,
Speaker 1: it's like remember what saw fucking uh? What was it?
Speaker 1: The Book of Spiral? We didn't get that and can
Speaker 1: I remember because the COVID times they just didn't release
Speaker 1: it here?
Speaker 3: Oh yeah's we.
Speaker 1: Define a friend find it for us, you know, like
Speaker 1: that sort of backup off a truck situation. So I
Speaker 1: will find a way, And it would be very funny
Speaker 1: if to the like if we got two Fredday Krueger's
Speaker 1: two movies. But then I think that also like hurts
Speaker 1: each other because people will be confused, like what's going
Speaker 1: on here, So I really don't know. It's a fascinating
Speaker 1: situation with these rights. But at the same time, if
Speaker 1: Paramount buys them and it goes through, then it goes
Speaker 1: away because then they just got the rights to both
Speaker 1: of them. So we'll have to see what happens. I
Speaker 1: don't know. I don't love the shot for shot thing,
Speaker 1: but as you can hear me and Taylor on different
Speaker 1: wavelengths for Barbie and this, so we'll have to see
Speaker 1: what happens. Let me check. I think that is everything.
Speaker 1: So that's all for the newscast tonight. Tale Fields It
Speaker 1: You did, easy, Easy, You're on the road, skull times.
Speaker 1: This guy, this guy man, he's you know, eventually you
Speaker 1: gotta get that. You gotta get those go out of
Speaker 1: pills that I popped one before I'm rocking.
Speaker 3: I did have a long str energy. No, sorry, I'm monster.
Speaker 2: It was a rain because they've got an orange creamsicle flavor.
Speaker 2: And that was on Saturday. That was the night that
Speaker 2: two o'clock, no supposed to be three day but yeah,
Speaker 2: Kirklam was up laying you're up late, and then I
Speaker 2: was I was a rod or not. It's like two
Speaker 2: o'clock in the morning, and that was that was great.
Speaker 2: I had it at like eight thirty and I was
Speaker 2: just wired working.
Speaker 3: It was nice.
Speaker 1: Well, and that's how I say people were working hard.
Speaker 1: Today is working on rod or not. I'm still working
Speaker 1: on some edits that I can't talk about. There's a
Speaker 1: couple of things I can't talk about yet that are
Speaker 1: gonna come out there. It's funny. I wanted to have
Speaker 1: the new opening ready for GV Day, but I think,
Speaker 1: you know, the Shawan Tombolt. There's something I really want
Speaker 1: to use in the new opening, but it would spoil
Speaker 1: something that's happening in GV Day. I'll just say the
Speaker 1: thing with the sky, the thing with the sky, Oh,
Speaker 1: the one that was really good, and I want to
Speaker 1: have that in the opening, but I don't know. So
Speaker 1: my theory is I might have the stream end with
Speaker 1: the opening, maybe start the opening with the og opener,
Speaker 1: and then say at the end like, oh, you know cool.
Speaker 1: That's what I think I might do because I really
Speaker 1: want that in there. So but yeah, we're we're working
Speaker 1: lots of stuff. We again, we try our best these streams,
Speaker 1: this and Extra Life. There is of course a podcast
Speaker 1: element at the gaming element, but we try and make
Speaker 1: it a show and worthroughw while in something different and special.
Speaker 1: So we hope to see a lot that's August. Like
Speaker 1: I said, we got other casts coming out this week,
Speaker 1: Taylor's on Side Quest me and TAYR got x men.
Speaker 1: We got a preview, maybe another newscast on Wednesday. If
Speaker 1: there's stuff, I'm gonna try a new Trys told you
Speaker 1: for Cape Crusader. We'll see And yeah, everyone keep listening
Speaker 1: to other reviews. Thank you very much for tuning in.
Speaker 1: I promise when you hear from us next it will
Speaker 1: not be boring.
Speaker 3: Bye bye