WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.399 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bedtime Astronomy. Explore the wonders of the cosmos

2
00:00:07.759 --> 00:00:12.279
<v Speaker 1>with our soothing Bedtime Astronomie podcast. Each episode offers a

3
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>gentle journey through the stars, planets, and beyond, perfect for

4
00:00:16.399 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>unwinding after a long day. Let's travel through the mysteries

5
00:00:20.239 --> 00:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the universe as you drift off into a peaceful

6
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>slumber under the night sky.

7
00:00:26.960 --> 00:00:31.039
<v Speaker 2>If you take a state of the art supercomputer today

8
00:00:31.359 --> 00:00:34.039
<v Speaker 2>and you feed it the mathematical equations for two black

9
00:00:34.079 --> 00:00:38.920
<v Speaker 2>holes colliding, it will take weeks of just NonStop processor

10
00:00:38.960 --> 00:00:40.600
<v Speaker 2>melting grinding to give you the answer.

11
00:00:40.759 --> 00:00:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that's if the simulation doesn't crash halfway through,

12
00:00:43.320 --> 00:00:44.960
<v Speaker 3>which it often used to.

13
00:00:45.240 --> 00:00:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Right. I mean, we are talking about tracking the absolute

14
00:00:47.640 --> 00:00:51.000
<v Speaker 2>most extreme violence in the cosmos. It's a collision so

15
00:00:51.200 --> 00:00:56.359
<v Speaker 2>powerful that it physically bends the geometry of reality itself, which.

16
00:00:56.159 --> 00:01:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Is incredibly hard to calculate. The numbers get unimaginably huge.

17
00:01:00.119 --> 00:01:03.119
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. Yeah, but there's this team of physicists of recently

18
00:01:03.119 --> 00:01:05.560
<v Speaker 2>published some research suggesting that you might be able to

19
00:01:05.599 --> 00:01:09.519
<v Speaker 2>get the exact same answer using basically the mathematics that

20
00:01:09.599 --> 00:01:11.920
<v Speaker 2>explains why your morning coffee gets cold.

21
00:01:12.280 --> 00:01:14.599
<v Speaker 3>It is I mean, it's one of the most counterintuitive

22
00:01:14.599 --> 00:01:17.000
<v Speaker 3>proposals in modern astrophysics right now.

23
00:01:17.159 --> 00:01:19.599
<v Speaker 2>It really is. And if you follow astrophysics at all,

24
00:01:19.640 --> 00:01:23.040
<v Speaker 2>you know about this enduring frustration. Right. But the two

25
00:01:23.079 --> 00:01:26.079
<v Speaker 2>great paradigms of physics. You've got quantum mechounics and thermodynamaz

26
00:01:26.200 --> 00:01:28.680
<v Speaker 2>on one side, and then general relativity on the other.

27
00:01:28.840 --> 00:01:32.359
<v Speaker 3>And they notoriously refuse to speak the same language. It's

28
00:01:32.359 --> 00:01:35.120
<v Speaker 3>like they're operating in two completely different universes.

29
00:01:34.680 --> 00:01:36.959
<v Speaker 2>Right, So what we're looking at today is a tangible

30
00:01:37.480 --> 00:01:40.680
<v Speaker 2>mathematical bridge between them. We are talking about how the

31
00:01:40.760 --> 00:01:46.040
<v Speaker 2>ultimate agents of cosmic chaos are well secretly governed by

32
00:01:46.079 --> 00:01:48.239
<v Speaker 2>the mundane physics of your kitchen.

33
00:01:48.400 --> 00:01:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the historical divide you just mentioned, that's really the

34
00:01:50.959 --> 00:01:54.920
<v Speaker 3>core of the whole problem. General relativity, you know, Einstein's masterpiece.

35
00:01:55.040 --> 00:01:56.560
<v Speaker 3>It's the ultimate theory of the.

36
00:01:56.439 --> 00:02:00.040
<v Speaker 2>Macroscopic, the big stuff, planets, galaxies.

37
00:01:59.519 --> 00:02:03.519
<v Speaker 3>Gravity exactly, and it is entirely deterministic. So if you

38
00:02:03.640 --> 00:02:07.239
<v Speaker 3>know the precise state of space time right now, Einstein's

39
00:02:07.239 --> 00:02:11.159
<v Speaker 3>equations should theoretically at least tell you exactly what space

40
00:02:11.199 --> 00:02:12.800
<v Speaker 3>time will do a second from now.

41
00:02:12.919 --> 00:02:15.400
<v Speaker 2>A cause is b every single time right.

42
00:02:15.439 --> 00:02:18.439
<v Speaker 3>But thermodynamics, on the other hand, is a statistical science.

43
00:02:18.479 --> 00:02:22.039
<v Speaker 3>It does not care about the deterministic path of individual atoms.

44
00:02:22.280 --> 00:02:26.840
<v Speaker 3>It relies entirely on probability and macro averages.

45
00:02:27.000 --> 00:02:29.199
<v Speaker 2>Like you don't track every single water molecule in a

46
00:02:29.240 --> 00:02:31.879
<v Speaker 2>boying pot, You just measure the overall temperature precisely.

47
00:02:32.599 --> 00:02:35.919
<v Speaker 3>So to suggest that you can bypass the deterministic tracking

48
00:02:35.960 --> 00:02:39.360
<v Speaker 3>of a black hole merger and instead treat the collision

49
00:02:39.520 --> 00:02:42.520
<v Speaker 3>like say, a mixing of two hot gases, that is

50
00:02:42.759 --> 00:02:46.520
<v Speaker 3>a radical departure from how we've calculated these events for decades.

51
00:02:46.639 --> 00:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>It's nuts. But before we get into how a black

52
00:02:49.520 --> 00:02:53.520
<v Speaker 2>hole could possibly behave like a mixing gas, I think

53
00:02:53.520 --> 00:02:57.400
<v Speaker 2>we really have to establish what exactly is happening during

54
00:02:57.439 --> 00:02:59.439
<v Speaker 2>one of these mergers, Like let's look at the actual

55
00:02:59.439 --> 00:03:00.639
<v Speaker 2>physical crest.

56
00:03:00.240 --> 00:03:02.439
<v Speaker 3>That idea visualizing it is key.

57
00:03:02.599 --> 00:03:05.400
<v Speaker 2>So we've got two black holes locked in this decaying orbit,

58
00:03:05.960 --> 00:03:09.039
<v Speaker 2>and because of this sheer mass involved, they're dragging space

59
00:03:09.080 --> 00:03:12.919
<v Speaker 2>time along with them. They're spiraling inward, approaching a significant

60
00:03:12.919 --> 00:03:15.680
<v Speaker 2>fraction of the speed of light, and they eventually.

61
00:03:15.240 --> 00:03:18.199
<v Speaker 3>Touch, and that exact moment of contact is where the

62
00:03:18.240 --> 00:03:21.520
<v Speaker 3>physics gets incredibly hostile. You have to remember that a

63
00:03:21.560 --> 00:03:24.560
<v Speaker 3>black hole, it's not a solid object, right, There's no surface,

64
00:03:24.639 --> 00:03:26.800
<v Speaker 3>no surface you can knock on. The black hole is

65
00:03:26.840 --> 00:03:29.360
<v Speaker 3>just a region of space where gravity is so intense

66
00:03:29.439 --> 00:03:32.120
<v Speaker 3>that the escape velocity exceeds the speed of light. The

67
00:03:32.159 --> 00:03:34.360
<v Speaker 3>boundary of that region is the event horizon.

68
00:03:34.680 --> 00:03:37.680
<v Speaker 2>So it's just pure math, essentially a mathematical line in

69
00:03:37.719 --> 00:03:38.039
<v Speaker 2>the sand.

70
00:03:38.240 --> 00:03:42.599
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, when two black holes merge, you are watching two

71
00:03:42.719 --> 00:03:47.080
<v Speaker 3>purely mathematical boundaries in space time colliding and reshaping each other.

72
00:03:47.800 --> 00:03:51.280
<v Speaker 3>The event horizons deform, they reach out toward each other,

73
00:03:51.560 --> 00:03:55.719
<v Speaker 3>and they snap together into a single, highly distorted, sort

74
00:03:55.719 --> 00:03:57.159
<v Speaker 3>of peanut shaped horizon.

75
00:03:57.319 --> 00:04:01.639
<v Speaker 2>I've always loved that visual, a giant cosmic peanut. And

76
00:04:01.719 --> 00:04:04.800
<v Speaker 2>the energy released when that snapping happens is staggering. I mean,

77
00:04:04.840 --> 00:04:07.439
<v Speaker 2>a typical merger can release more energy in a fraction

78
00:04:07.479 --> 00:04:10.120
<v Speaker 2>of a second than all the stars in the observable

79
00:04:10.199 --> 00:04:10.960
<v Speaker 2>universe combined.

80
00:04:11.039 --> 00:04:14.120
<v Speaker 3>It's an output of power that literally outshines everything else

81
00:04:14.159 --> 00:04:15.319
<v Speaker 3>in the universe put together.

82
00:04:15.599 --> 00:04:18.399
<v Speaker 2>But here's the mechanism I really want to understand. If

83
00:04:18.439 --> 00:04:21.480
<v Speaker 2>there's no actual physical matter collidinge Like, there's no rock,

84
00:04:21.560 --> 00:04:24.920
<v Speaker 2>no gas, just event horizons, what exactly is carrying that

85
00:04:25.040 --> 00:04:25.600
<v Speaker 2>energy away.

86
00:04:25.680 --> 00:04:28.000
<v Speaker 3>That's the wild part. The energy is carried away by

87
00:04:28.000 --> 00:04:32.360
<v Speaker 3>the very fabric of reality itself. When those horizons merge,

88
00:04:32.439 --> 00:04:35.720
<v Speaker 3>the surrounding space time is subjected to catastrophic stress.

89
00:04:35.759 --> 00:04:37.000
<v Speaker 2>It's again stretched and pulled.

90
00:04:37.319 --> 00:04:42.959
<v Speaker 3>Right. In general, relativity dictates that accelerating masses produce gravitational waves.

91
00:04:43.600 --> 00:04:47.680
<v Speaker 3>So just as an accelerat and electrical charge produces electromagnetic waves,

92
00:04:48.000 --> 00:04:50.600
<v Speaker 3>accelerating masses produce ripples and gravity.

93
00:04:50.720 --> 00:04:53.000
<v Speaker 2>So in the final moments of that spiral, and especially

94
00:04:53.040 --> 00:04:56.519
<v Speaker 2>during the actual merger, the black holes are just churning

95
00:04:56.680 --> 00:04:58.040
<v Speaker 2>space time into waves.

96
00:04:58.319 --> 00:05:02.279
<v Speaker 3>Yes, they are converting massive portion of their combined mass

97
00:05:02.560 --> 00:05:06.240
<v Speaker 3>directly into the energy of these gravitational waves. Space time

98
00:05:06.279 --> 00:05:09.839
<v Speaker 3>itself is stretching and squeezing, undulating outward at the speed

99
00:05:09.879 --> 00:05:10.160
<v Speaker 3>of light.

100
00:05:10.319 --> 00:05:12.319
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Okay, I want to use an analogy here to

101
00:05:12.319 --> 00:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>help visualize this. If space time is a trampoline, this

102
00:05:16.079 --> 00:05:19.160
<v Speaker 2>collision isn't just dropping a bowling ball on it. It's like

103
00:05:19.199 --> 00:05:22.600
<v Speaker 2>two bowling balls smashing into dust, sending these massive ripples

104
00:05:22.839 --> 00:05:24.959
<v Speaker 2>across the entire surface of the trampoline.

105
00:05:24.959 --> 00:05:26.800
<v Speaker 3>That's a great way to put it. The trampoline mat

106
00:05:26.800 --> 00:05:28.519
<v Speaker 3>itself is what's carrying the energy away.

107
00:05:28.720 --> 00:05:33.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we have this wildly asymmetric, wobbling freshly merged

108
00:05:33.680 --> 00:05:37.439
<v Speaker 2>black hole. It's highly unstable, and physicist Monica ring Con

109
00:05:37.519 --> 00:05:41.639
<v Speaker 2>Ramirez describes this exact phase with some really striking imagery.

110
00:05:42.120 --> 00:05:45.319
<v Speaker 2>She points out that immediately post merger, the remnant black

111
00:05:45.319 --> 00:05:47.000
<v Speaker 2>hole is ringing like a struck bell.

112
00:05:47.120 --> 00:05:48.519
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the ring down phase, right.

113
00:05:48.720 --> 00:05:51.959
<v Speaker 2>It vibrates and it radiates away excess energy through those

114
00:05:51.959 --> 00:05:55.600
<v Speaker 2>gravitational waves until it finally settles into a calm, stable state.

115
00:05:56.199 --> 00:05:59.240
<v Speaker 2>But way a bell rings because the metal physically vibrates

116
00:05:59.240 --> 00:06:02.879
<v Speaker 2>and displaces air molecules. A black hole is, as we said,

117
00:06:02.920 --> 00:06:08.480
<v Speaker 2>empty space banded by a horizon. What is physically quivering

118
00:06:08.920 --> 00:06:10.160
<v Speaker 2>if there is no matter there?

119
00:06:10.240 --> 00:06:13.040
<v Speaker 3>That is the perfect question to exposse just how weird

120
00:06:13.199 --> 00:06:15.920
<v Speaker 3>general relativity is. When we say it rings, we're talking

121
00:06:15.920 --> 00:06:18.560
<v Speaker 3>about a phenomenon called quasinormal.

122
00:06:17.879 --> 00:06:18.959
<v Speaker 2>Modes wisnero modes.

123
00:06:19.000 --> 00:06:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, think of space time as a highly taught

124
00:06:21.639 --> 00:06:25.040
<v Speaker 3>elastic medium like your trampoline met the event horizon is perturbed,

125
00:06:25.040 --> 00:06:28.240
<v Speaker 3>meaning its geometry is highly irregular, like that peanut ship

126
00:06:28.279 --> 00:06:28.959
<v Speaker 3>we mentioned.

127
00:06:28.759 --> 00:06:30.279
<v Speaker 2>Right, it's all lopsided.

128
00:06:30.160 --> 00:06:33.319
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, and because a black hole naturally wants to be

129
00:06:33.399 --> 00:06:36.680
<v Speaker 3>perfectly smooth and spherical, or at least a blate if

130
00:06:36.720 --> 00:06:39.920
<v Speaker 3>it's spinning, the natural laws of gravity forced that irregularity

131
00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:43.399
<v Speaker 3>to smooth out. The ringing is the actual metric of

132
00:06:43.519 --> 00:06:44.839
<v Speaker 3>space time oscillating.

133
00:06:45.079 --> 00:06:48.680
<v Speaker 2>So the horizon is violently shifting from elongated to compressed

134
00:06:49.079 --> 00:06:49.519
<v Speaker 2>over and.

135
00:06:49.480 --> 00:06:53.519
<v Speaker 3>Over, yes, shedding the energy of those deformations as gravitational waves.

136
00:06:53.560 --> 00:06:56.600
<v Speaker 3>It's shedding its asymmetries, and as it sheds them, the

137
00:06:56.639 --> 00:07:02.000
<v Speaker 3>amplitude of those oscillations decays exponentially. That decay, that fading out,

138
00:07:02.079 --> 00:07:03.199
<v Speaker 3>is the ringing stopping.

139
00:07:03.800 --> 00:07:06.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so the ringing is literally the new black hole

140
00:07:06.519 --> 00:07:09.480
<v Speaker 2>ironing out its own wrinkles by throwing gravitational energy out

141
00:07:09.480 --> 00:07:10.120
<v Speaker 2>into the universe.

142
00:07:10.279 --> 00:07:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Ironing out its wrinkles is a brilliant way to describe it.

143
00:07:12.800 --> 00:07:14.800
<v Speaker 2>And when that ringing stops, when the wrinkles are all

144
00:07:14.839 --> 00:07:18.680
<v Speaker 2>ironed out, we are left with the final remnant. But

145
00:07:18.800 --> 00:07:21.680
<v Speaker 2>what fascinates me here is the sheer simplicity of that

146
00:07:21.720 --> 00:07:25.199
<v Speaker 2>final state. Based on the no hair theorem in astrophysics,

147
00:07:25.560 --> 00:07:28.079
<v Speaker 2>Once a black hole settles down, all of the chaotic

148
00:07:28.199 --> 00:07:29.600
<v Speaker 2>history of the collision.

149
00:07:29.160 --> 00:07:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Is just wiped out, completely erased.

150
00:07:31.240 --> 00:07:34.680
<v Speaker 2>The final object is defined by only two properties, mass

151
00:07:34.759 --> 00:07:35.279
<v Speaker 2>and spin.

152
00:07:35.560 --> 00:07:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, technically, the no hair theorem allows for three properties.

153
00:07:39.120 --> 00:07:41.839
<v Speaker 3>It's mass, spin, and electric charge.

154
00:07:41.959 --> 00:07:42.959
<v Speaker 2>Oh right, charge.

155
00:07:43.040 --> 00:07:47.560
<v Speaker 3>But know, in a realistic astrophysical setting, black holes have

156
00:07:47.839 --> 00:07:51.399
<v Speaker 3>negligible charge because they would just quickly attract opposite charges

157
00:07:51.399 --> 00:07:55.759
<v Speaker 3>from the surrounding plasma and neutralize themselves anyway. So practically speaking,

158
00:07:55.800 --> 00:07:58.680
<v Speaker 3>it's just two for all practical purposes. Yes, you are

159
00:07:58.800 --> 00:08:02.720
<v Speaker 3>entirely correct. We only care about two parameters, mass which

160
00:08:02.759 --> 00:08:05.519
<v Speaker 3>tells us the size of the event horizon, and spin

161
00:08:05.720 --> 00:08:08.680
<v Speaker 3>or angular momentum, which tells us how fast the black

162
00:08:08.680 --> 00:08:09.560
<v Speaker 3>hole is rotating.

163
00:08:09.920 --> 00:08:13.040
<v Speaker 2>So all the intricate details, the varying masses of the

164
00:08:13.079 --> 00:08:17.120
<v Speaker 2>original black holes, the specific angles they collided at, the

165
00:08:17.120 --> 00:08:20.160
<v Speaker 2>complex geometry, or the merger, all of that is just gone.

166
00:08:20.319 --> 00:08:23.720
<v Speaker 3>All that information is swallowed by the horizon or radiated

167
00:08:23.720 --> 00:08:24.759
<v Speaker 3>away into the universe.

168
00:08:24.920 --> 00:08:27.959
<v Speaker 2>Mass and spin. That is it. But if the final

169
00:08:28.000 --> 00:08:30.759
<v Speaker 2>state is just two simple numbers, why on earth do

170
00:08:30.800 --> 00:08:33.919
<v Speaker 2>we need supercomputers running for weeks to find them? I mean,

171
00:08:33.960 --> 00:08:36.840
<v Speaker 2>if I smash a two kilogram ball of clay into

172
00:08:36.919 --> 00:08:39.159
<v Speaker 2>a three kilogram ball of clay. I don't need a

173
00:08:39.200 --> 00:08:41.679
<v Speaker 2>supercomputer to tell me I have a five kilogram ball.

174
00:08:41.480 --> 00:08:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Of clay, because black holes do not obey simple Newtonian arithmetic.

175
00:08:46.080 --> 00:08:48.759
<v Speaker 3>When you smash those two balls of clay together, they

176
00:08:48.799 --> 00:08:52.679
<v Speaker 3>aren't radiating ten percent of their mass away into the

177
00:08:52.720 --> 00:08:54.039
<v Speaker 3>geometry of empty space.

178
00:08:54.200 --> 00:08:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Fair point. The energy loss is massive, right.

179
00:08:57.399 --> 00:08:59.840
<v Speaker 3>The problem lies in the equations we have to use

180
00:08:59.879 --> 00:09:04.240
<v Speaker 3>to calculate that loss. Einstein's field equations of general relativity

181
00:09:04.320 --> 00:09:09.399
<v Speaker 3>are a set of ten highly complex coupled nonlinear partial

182
00:09:09.519 --> 00:09:13.200
<v Speaker 3>differential equations, the keyword there being nonlinear.

183
00:09:13.559 --> 00:09:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's drill into that nonlinearity because that seems to be

184
00:09:16.440 --> 00:09:19.279
<v Speaker 2>the fundamental bottleneck here for the computers. Yeah, when we

185
00:09:19.320 --> 00:09:21.720
<v Speaker 2>say an equation is nonlinear in physics, we usually mean

186
00:09:21.759 --> 00:09:23.600
<v Speaker 2>the variables feedback into themselves.

187
00:09:23.639 --> 00:09:27.519
<v Speaker 3>Right, Precisely, in general relativity, mass and energy tell space

188
00:09:27.559 --> 00:09:30.559
<v Speaker 3>time how to curve, but that curvature dictates how mass

189
00:09:30.559 --> 00:09:31.399
<v Speaker 3>and energy.

190
00:09:31.159 --> 00:09:33.519
<v Speaker 2>Moves a chicken and egg situation exactly.

191
00:09:33.759 --> 00:09:37.679
<v Speaker 3>And because gravitational waves carry energy, the waves themselves exert gravity.

192
00:09:37.799 --> 00:09:39.679
<v Speaker 3>So you have a situation where the changing shape of

193
00:09:39.679 --> 00:09:42.679
<v Speaker 3>space generates energy, which changes the shape of space, which

194
00:09:42.759 --> 00:09:46.080
<v Speaker 3>generates more energy. It is just a catastrophic feedback loop.

195
00:09:46.159 --> 00:09:47.639
<v Speaker 2>Wow, So how do you even calculate that?

196
00:09:47.759 --> 00:09:51.679
<v Speaker 3>To solve this mathematically, physicists use something called numerical relativity.

197
00:09:52.399 --> 00:09:56.600
<v Speaker 3>They break spacetime down into a massive three dimensional grid,

198
00:09:57.120 --> 00:10:02.159
<v Speaker 3>stepping forward in time in tiny, tiny increments at every

199
00:10:02.200 --> 00:10:05.519
<v Speaker 3>single intersection on that grid. For every fraction of a microsecond,

200
00:10:05.799 --> 00:10:10.399
<v Speaker 3>the supercomputer has to recalculate the entire ten component metric tensor.

201
00:10:10.519 --> 00:10:14.039
<v Speaker 2>That sounds incredibly taxing, and if the grid isn't precise enough,

202
00:10:14.080 --> 00:10:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the math literally blows up, doesn't it. I know that

203
00:10:16.639 --> 00:10:19.360
<v Speaker 2>for decades, physicists couldn't even get the simulations to run

204
00:10:19.399 --> 00:10:21.320
<v Speaker 2>past the first few milliseconds of a merger.

205
00:10:21.399 --> 00:10:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it was a nightmare for theoretical physicists. The coordinate

206
00:10:24.759 --> 00:10:28.000
<v Speaker 3>systems would just fail, The values would shoot up to infinity,

207
00:10:28.039 --> 00:10:28.960
<v Speaker 3>and the computer.

208
00:10:28.639 --> 00:10:31.879
<v Speaker 2>Would crash right because it just couldn't handle the infinite

209
00:10:31.879 --> 00:10:35.279
<v Speaker 2>feedback loop. It wasn't until two thousand and five I

210
00:10:35.279 --> 00:10:38.159
<v Speaker 2>think that Transpiratory has finally figured out a mathematical trick

211
00:10:38.360 --> 00:10:41.360
<v Speaker 2>to keep the simulation stable through the actual merger. So

212
00:10:41.440 --> 00:10:44.759
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about an incredibly brutal, computationally exhausting method.

213
00:10:45.080 --> 00:10:48.879
<v Speaker 3>It is a tour de force of human computation. You

214
00:10:48.919 --> 00:10:53.960
<v Speaker 3>are tracking the microscopic evolution of spacetime geometry through sheer

215
00:10:54.240 --> 00:10:58.840
<v Speaker 3>brute force determinism. You're mapping every single ripple, every distortion

216
00:10:58.960 --> 00:11:02.159
<v Speaker 3>to see exactly how much mass and spin is radiated away,

217
00:11:02.440 --> 00:11:04.559
<v Speaker 3>just so you can subtract that from the initial total

218
00:11:04.679 --> 00:11:05.399
<v Speaker 3>to find out what.

219
00:11:05.440 --> 00:11:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Is left over, which brings us to the alternate route,

220
00:11:08.399 --> 00:11:10.919
<v Speaker 2>the shortcut that honestly feels like a cheat code.

221
00:11:11.039 --> 00:11:11.679
<v Speaker 3>It really does.

222
00:11:11.919 --> 00:11:16.440
<v Speaker 2>The researchers at Penn State, including bs Sethi, Podcash, Nathan K.

223
00:11:16.559 --> 00:11:20.159
<v Speaker 2>John To McDaniel, and their colleagues, are proposing that we

224
00:11:20.279 --> 00:11:23.200
<v Speaker 2>don't need to track the deterministic geometry of space time

225
00:11:23.360 --> 00:11:27.320
<v Speaker 2>step by step. They argue we can bypass numerical relativity

226
00:11:27.440 --> 00:11:30.600
<v Speaker 2>entirely by using thermodynamics.

227
00:11:29.799 --> 00:11:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Which is a huge lead, right.

228
00:11:31.679 --> 00:11:33.519
<v Speaker 2>But to make that lead, we have to look at

229
00:11:33.600 --> 00:11:36.320
<v Speaker 2>why black holes and thermodynamics are even allowed in the

230
00:11:36.320 --> 00:11:38.480
<v Speaker 2>same room together in the first place, because for a

231
00:11:38.519 --> 00:11:40.240
<v Speaker 2>really long time they absolutely were not.

232
00:11:40.639 --> 00:11:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Historically, black holes were considered thermodynamic dead ends. I mean

233
00:11:43.840 --> 00:11:46.720
<v Speaker 3>that classical laws of general relativity state that nothing can

234
00:11:46.840 --> 00:11:50.080
<v Speaker 3>escape an event horizon, not even light right, And if

235
00:11:50.120 --> 00:11:54.080
<v Speaker 3>nothing can escape, a black hole cannot emit heat. If

236
00:11:54.120 --> 00:11:57.480
<v Speaker 3>an object cannot emit heat, its temperature must be absolute zero.

237
00:11:57.960 --> 00:11:59.919
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that makes sense under classical rule.

238
00:12:00.159 --> 00:12:03.120
<v Speaker 3>But here's the catch. In classical thermodynamics. If you drop

239
00:12:03.159 --> 00:12:05.440
<v Speaker 3>a hot cup of coffee, which has a lot of entropy,

240
00:12:05.519 --> 00:12:08.679
<v Speaker 3>a lot of disordered microscopic states, into a black hole,

241
00:12:09.200 --> 00:12:12.200
<v Speaker 3>that entropy vanishes from the observable universe.

242
00:12:12.279 --> 00:12:14.399
<v Speaker 2>Oh I see, and that violates the second law of

243
00:12:14.440 --> 00:12:15.960
<v Speaker 2>thermodynamics exactly.

244
00:12:16.320 --> 00:12:18.600
<v Speaker 3>The second law states that the total entropy of the

245
00:12:18.679 --> 00:12:20.480
<v Speaker 3>universe must always increase.

246
00:12:21.159 --> 00:12:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Right, Because if you could just throw your entropy into

247
00:12:23.279 --> 00:12:26.279
<v Speaker 2>a black hole and completely erase it, you're decreasing the

248
00:12:26.399 --> 00:12:28.879
<v Speaker 2>entropy of the universe. You are cheating the most fundamental

249
00:12:28.960 --> 00:12:33.039
<v Speaker 2>law of nature. And that paradox that's what led Jacob

250
00:12:33.039 --> 00:12:36.279
<v Speaker 2>Bekenstein and Stephen Hawking to completely rewrite astrophysics in the

251
00:12:36.320 --> 00:12:37.919
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventies, isn't it it is?

252
00:12:38.039 --> 00:12:40.919
<v Speaker 3>Bekenstein was the first to propose the heresy. Really, he

253
00:12:41.039 --> 00:12:43.600
<v Speaker 3>suggested that black holes must have entropy, and that the

254
00:12:43.720 --> 00:12:46.559
<v Speaker 3>entropy must be proportional to the surface area of the

255
00:12:46.600 --> 00:12:48.879
<v Speaker 3>event horizon, not its volume.

256
00:12:48.679 --> 00:12:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Not the volume, but the surface area yes.

257
00:12:51.200 --> 00:12:53.519
<v Speaker 3>So when you throw the coffee cup in, the black

258
00:12:53.519 --> 00:12:57.559
<v Speaker 3>hole gains mass, its event horizon physically grows, its area increases,

259
00:12:57.960 --> 00:13:01.440
<v Speaker 3>and therefore its entropy increases, satisfying the second law.

260
00:13:01.399 --> 00:13:06.159
<v Speaker 2>Boom paradox solved. But Hawking initially hated that idea, didn't

261
00:13:06.200 --> 00:13:09.480
<v Speaker 2>he because if a black hole has entropy, it must

262
00:13:09.519 --> 00:13:11.279
<v Speaker 2>have a temperature, and if it has a temperature, it

263
00:13:11.320 --> 00:13:14.600
<v Speaker 2>must radiate heat. But we just establish nothing can escape

264
00:13:14.600 --> 00:13:17.759
<v Speaker 2>a black hole. So Hawking actually set out to mathematically

265
00:13:17.840 --> 00:13:19.240
<v Speaker 2>prove Beckenstein wrong.

266
00:13:19.480 --> 00:13:20.039
<v Speaker 1>He did.

267
00:13:20.519 --> 00:13:23.799
<v Speaker 3>Hawking applied quantum field theory to the curved space time

268
00:13:23.919 --> 00:13:27.960
<v Speaker 3>near the event horizon, fully intending to disprove Beckenstein's theory,

269
00:13:28.080 --> 00:13:29.320
<v Speaker 3>but instead he.

270
00:13:29.360 --> 00:13:31.919
<v Speaker 2>Proved him right, which is hilarious and brilliant.

271
00:13:32.000 --> 00:13:34.600
<v Speaker 3>It's now considered one of the greatest theoretical discoveries of

272
00:13:34.639 --> 00:13:37.840
<v Speaker 3>the twentieth century. Hawking discovered that black holes are not

273
00:13:37.960 --> 00:13:39.559
<v Speaker 3>completely black. They glow.

274
00:13:40.039 --> 00:13:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's break down the mechanics of that glow because it

275
00:13:42.720 --> 00:13:45.960
<v Speaker 2>is crucial for understanding how the Penn State team applies

276
00:13:45.960 --> 00:13:50.159
<v Speaker 2>thermodynamics to a merger. The glow is Hawking radiation, But

277
00:13:50.240 --> 00:13:53.759
<v Speaker 2>how does empty space near horizon suddenly radiate particles.

278
00:13:54.200 --> 00:13:56.440
<v Speaker 3>We have to look at the vacuum of space through

279
00:13:56.440 --> 00:14:00.320
<v Speaker 3>the lens of quantum mechanics. In quantum field theory, a

280
00:14:00.399 --> 00:14:03.759
<v Speaker 3>vacuum is not truly empty. It is this boiling sea

281
00:14:03.960 --> 00:14:05.600
<v Speaker 3>of quantum fluctuation.

282
00:14:05.200 --> 00:14:06.799
<v Speaker 2>Just psi chaotic massive energy.

283
00:14:07.000 --> 00:14:10.679
<v Speaker 3>Exactly pairs of virtual particles. A particle and its anti

284
00:14:10.720 --> 00:14:15.399
<v Speaker 3>particle are constantly popping into existence, borrowing energy from the universe,

285
00:14:15.480 --> 00:14:18.480
<v Speaker 3>and then instantly annihilating each other to pay the energy back.

286
00:14:19.080 --> 00:14:22.240
<v Speaker 3>This happens everywhere, all the time, in your living room,

287
00:14:22.440 --> 00:14:23.840
<v Speaker 3>in deep space, everywhere.

288
00:14:23.919 --> 00:14:26.559
<v Speaker 2>But when this happens exactly on the razor's edge of

289
00:14:26.559 --> 00:14:29.879
<v Speaker 2>an event horizon, the script changes dramatically.

290
00:14:30.159 --> 00:14:33.200
<v Speaker 3>If a pair of virtual particles pops into existence right

291
00:14:33.240 --> 00:14:36.879
<v Speaker 3>on that boundary, the intense gravitational gradient can pull them

292
00:14:36.879 --> 00:14:39.159
<v Speaker 3>apart before they even have a chance to annihilate.

293
00:14:39.200 --> 00:14:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Wow, so the gravity is stronger than their attraction to

294
00:14:41.480 --> 00:14:41.840
<v Speaker 2>each other.

295
00:14:41.960 --> 00:14:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, one particle falls past the horizon into the black hole.

296
00:14:45.879 --> 00:14:49.080
<v Speaker 3>The other particle, just outside the horizon, is violently propelled

297
00:14:49.080 --> 00:14:51.879
<v Speaker 3>out into the universe. So to an outside observer it

298
00:14:51.919 --> 00:14:54.600
<v Speaker 3>looks exactly as if the black hole just emitted a particle.

299
00:14:54.639 --> 00:14:56.200
<v Speaker 3>It radiated heat I've.

300
00:14:56.039 --> 00:14:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Always struggled with the mass accounting here, though. If the

301
00:14:58.720 --> 00:15:01.399
<v Speaker 2>black hole absorbs one particle and shoots out the other,

302
00:15:01.600 --> 00:15:05.000
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't its mass increase or at least just stay the same.

303
00:15:05.639 --> 00:15:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Why does Hawking radiation cause the black hole to slowly

304
00:15:08.679 --> 00:15:09.799
<v Speaker 2>evaporate over time?

305
00:15:10.120 --> 00:15:13.840
<v Speaker 3>It comes down to energy conservation. The virtual particle pair

306
00:15:14.039 --> 00:15:17.639
<v Speaker 3>was created by borrowing energy from the vacuum. When they

307
00:15:17.639 --> 00:15:21.120
<v Speaker 3>are separated, the particle that escapes becomes a real particle

308
00:15:21.200 --> 00:15:22.320
<v Speaker 3>with positive energy.

309
00:15:22.399 --> 00:15:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so the universe gains a positive particle.

310
00:15:24.480 --> 00:15:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Right, So for the Universe's energy ledger to balance, the

311
00:15:27.840 --> 00:15:30.840
<v Speaker 3>particle that fell into the black hole must have negative

312
00:15:30.960 --> 00:15:34.080
<v Speaker 3>energy relative to the outside universe. When the black hole

313
00:15:34.159 --> 00:15:37.399
<v Speaker 3>absorbs that negative energy, its total mass decreases.

314
00:15:37.480 --> 00:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>That is such a brilliant mechanism. The universe balances as

315
00:15:40.639 --> 00:15:43.279
<v Speaker 2>checkbook and the black hole shrinks. And by proving that

316
00:15:43.320 --> 00:15:47.639
<v Speaker 2>black holes have a temperature and slowly evaporate, Hawking fundamentally

317
00:15:47.679 --> 00:15:52.759
<v Speaker 2>linked gravity and thermodynamics. He finalized the Beekenstein Hawking formula,

318
00:15:53.000 --> 00:15:55.919
<v Speaker 2>which mathematically defines the entropy of a black hole.

319
00:15:56.039 --> 00:16:00.000
<v Speaker 3>And that formula is breathtaking. It incorporates the fundamental consts

320
00:16:00.320 --> 00:16:02.840
<v Speaker 3>from almost every major branch of physics.

321
00:16:03.000 --> 00:16:04.639
<v Speaker 2>It's like the ultimate crossover event.

322
00:16:04.759 --> 00:16:07.799
<v Speaker 3>It really is. It includes Newton's constant for gravity, the

323
00:16:07.840 --> 00:16:11.879
<v Speaker 3>speed of light for relativity, Plank's constant for quantum mechanics,

324
00:16:12.240 --> 00:16:16.799
<v Speaker 3>and Boltzmann's constant for thermodynamics. It perfectly weaves them all

325
00:16:16.799 --> 00:16:19.080
<v Speaker 3>together to state that the entropy of a black hole

326
00:16:19.399 --> 00:16:22.320
<v Speaker 3>is exactly a quarter of the area of its event horizon.

327
00:16:22.679 --> 00:16:25.559
<v Speaker 2>But here is the massive problem that the Penn State

328
00:16:25.600 --> 00:16:30.279
<v Speaker 2>researchers had to confront. Hawking's math, as beautiful as it is,

329
00:16:30.759 --> 00:16:35.279
<v Speaker 2>was formulated for static, stationary black holes, a black hole

330
00:16:35.639 --> 00:16:39.200
<v Speaker 2>just sitting out there in the void, slowly glowing. It

331
00:16:39.240 --> 00:16:42.039
<v Speaker 2>was not designed for the apocalyptic chaos of two black

332
00:16:42.080 --> 00:16:44.840
<v Speaker 2>holes colliding at half the speed of light. Not at all.

333
00:16:44.960 --> 00:16:47.879
<v Speaker 2>Taking the thermodynamics of a quiet black hole and trying

334
00:16:47.879 --> 00:16:50.399
<v Speaker 2>to apply to a violent merger, it seems like trying

335
00:16:50.399 --> 00:16:53.039
<v Speaker 2>to use a thermometer to measure a bomb going off.

336
00:16:53.159 --> 00:16:56.240
<v Speaker 3>That's a very accurate comparison. It is a massive leap.

337
00:16:56.519 --> 00:16:59.480
<v Speaker 3>The Penn State team, led by researchers like Safi Prickash

338
00:16:59.480 --> 00:17:02.559
<v Speaker 3>and by Shock Prosad, they had to prove that thermodynamic

339
00:17:02.639 --> 00:17:05.039
<v Speaker 3>rules don't just apply it to quiet black holes, but

340
00:17:05.119 --> 00:17:08.559
<v Speaker 3>to dynamic, rapidly evolving space times.

341
00:17:08.240 --> 00:17:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Space times that are literally ripping themselves apart exactly.

342
00:17:11.839 --> 00:17:14.640
<v Speaker 3>They hypothesize that even in the midst of a violent merger,

343
00:17:15.079 --> 00:17:19.559
<v Speaker 3>the underlying principles of thermodynamics are still driving the bus. Specifically,

344
00:17:19.599 --> 00:17:23.519
<v Speaker 3>they proposed the maximum entropy conjecture for black hole mergers.

345
00:17:23.839 --> 00:17:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we need to completely define what entropy means in

346
00:17:26.720 --> 00:17:29.480
<v Speaker 2>the context of a black hole here, because the standard

347
00:17:29.480 --> 00:17:33.200
<v Speaker 2>analogy everyone learns in high school physics is the messy room. Right. Ye,

348
00:17:33.400 --> 00:17:36.000
<v Speaker 2>A tidy room has low entropy. A messy room has

349
00:17:36.079 --> 00:17:38.559
<v Speaker 2>high entropy, just because there are more ways for things

350
00:17:38.640 --> 00:17:39.559
<v Speaker 2>to be messy than.

351
00:17:39.440 --> 00:17:40.839
<v Speaker 3>Tidy, the classic example.

352
00:17:40.960 --> 00:17:43.000
<v Speaker 2>But a black hole isn't a room full of socks

353
00:17:43.039 --> 00:17:44.680
<v Speaker 2>and books, it's empty space.

354
00:17:45.640 --> 00:17:49.279
<v Speaker 3>How do you measure the messiness of a completely featureless void.

355
00:17:49.839 --> 00:17:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, the messy room analogy is helpful for basic intuition,

356
00:17:52.880 --> 00:17:55.160
<v Speaker 2>but to really understand this research, we have to look

357
00:17:55.200 --> 00:17:58.400
<v Speaker 2>at entropy in terms of statistical mechanics. Entropy is not

358
00:17:58.440 --> 00:18:03.000
<v Speaker 2>just messiness decisse measure of microstates mapping to a macrostate.

359
00:18:03.160 --> 00:18:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Microstates and macrostates break that down for me, think of

360
00:18:06.400 --> 00:18:10.880
<v Speaker 3>a digital photograph on your computer screen. The image you see,

361
00:18:11.160 --> 00:18:13.000
<v Speaker 3>let's say it's a picture of an apple, that is

362
00:18:13.000 --> 00:18:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the macrostate, the specific arrangement of millions of individual red, green,

363
00:18:18.200 --> 00:18:20.960
<v Speaker 3>and blue pixels that make up that image. Those are

364
00:18:21.000 --> 00:18:21.759
<v Speaker 3>the microstates.

365
00:18:21.759 --> 00:18:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so if I change the color of one single

366
00:18:24.039 --> 00:18:26.799
<v Speaker 2>pixel hidden in the shadow of the apple, the image

367
00:18:26.960 --> 00:18:29.440
<v Speaker 2>still looks exactly like an apple. To make it's a

368
00:18:29.440 --> 00:18:32.720
<v Speaker 2>different microstate, but the exact same macrostate exactly.

369
00:18:32.920 --> 00:18:36.119
<v Speaker 3>Now apply that to a gas in a balloon. The

370
00:18:36.240 --> 00:18:40.319
<v Speaker 3>overall temperature, pressure, and volume of the gas those make

371
00:18:40.400 --> 00:18:44.160
<v Speaker 3>up the macrostate. The precise position and velocity of every

372
00:18:44.240 --> 00:18:48.279
<v Speaker 3>single microscopic gas molecule bouncing around inside the balloon are

373
00:18:48.319 --> 00:18:49.000
<v Speaker 3>the microstates.

374
00:18:49.039 --> 00:18:50.960
<v Speaker 2>There's a near infinite number of this, right.

375
00:18:50.920 --> 00:18:53.319
<v Speaker 3>There are billions of different ways those molecules could be

376
00:18:53.359 --> 00:18:55.720
<v Speaker 3>bouncing around that would all result in the exact same

377
00:18:55.759 --> 00:19:00.319
<v Speaker 3>temperature and pressure. Therefore, the gas has high entropy many

378
00:19:00.400 --> 00:19:02.759
<v Speaker 3>micro states correspond to its single macro state.

379
00:19:02.960 --> 00:19:06.160
<v Speaker 2>So how does this map onto a black hole? Because

380
00:19:06.200 --> 00:19:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the no hair theorem says the macrostate of a black

381
00:19:08.720 --> 00:19:12.720
<v Speaker 2>hole is completely defined by just mass and spin. But

382
00:19:12.839 --> 00:19:15.160
<v Speaker 2>what are the hidden pixels? What are the micro states

383
00:19:15.200 --> 00:19:15.880
<v Speaker 2>of a black hole?

384
00:19:16.119 --> 00:19:18.720
<v Speaker 3>That is one of the deepest mysteries in theoretical physics

385
00:19:18.799 --> 00:19:21.799
<v Speaker 3>right now. It's heavily researched in string theory and loop

386
00:19:21.920 --> 00:19:25.359
<v Speaker 3>quantum gravity. We don't have a fully verified quantum theory

387
00:19:25.359 --> 00:19:27.960
<v Speaker 3>of gravity yet, so we don't know exactly what the

388
00:19:28.000 --> 00:19:30.839
<v Speaker 3>microscopic building blocks of a black hole actually are.

389
00:19:31.160 --> 00:19:32.880
<v Speaker 2>So we're flying blind on the micro.

390
00:19:32.720 --> 00:19:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Level we are, but the Beckenstein Hawking entropy formula guarantees

391
00:19:37.000 --> 00:19:39.839
<v Speaker 3>that they exist. Even if we can't see the individual

392
00:19:39.880 --> 00:19:42.559
<v Speaker 3>pixels of the black hole, we know they are there,

393
00:19:42.960 --> 00:19:45.640
<v Speaker 3>and we know exactly how many there are based purely

394
00:19:45.680 --> 00:19:47.759
<v Speaker 3>on the surface area of the event horizon.

395
00:19:47.960 --> 00:19:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Wow. And this allows the Penn state researchers to treat

396
00:19:51.039 --> 00:19:56.279
<v Speaker 2>the black holes exactly like interacting gases. Physicist Eugenio Bianki

397
00:19:56.359 --> 00:19:59.279
<v Speaker 2>brought up this specific gas analogy. He said, if you

398
00:19:59.319 --> 00:20:01.480
<v Speaker 2>take a box of hot oxygen and a box of

399
00:20:01.519 --> 00:20:04.319
<v Speaker 2>cold nitrogen and you open a valve between them, the

400
00:20:04.359 --> 00:20:07.880
<v Speaker 2>gases mix. To figure out the final temperature and pressure

401
00:20:08.200 --> 00:20:12.119
<v Speaker 2>of the mixed gas, you don't need a supercomputer tracking

402
00:20:12.160 --> 00:20:16.400
<v Speaker 2>the deterministic collision path of every single oxygen and nitrogen molecule.

403
00:20:16.599 --> 00:20:18.680
<v Speaker 2>That would be impossible. You would just use the laws

404
00:20:18.680 --> 00:20:22.759
<v Speaker 2>of thermodynamics. Nature will automatically drive the system toward the

405
00:20:22.759 --> 00:20:26.680
<v Speaker 2>state that has the highest possible number of microstates. Nature

406
00:20:26.759 --> 00:20:28.119
<v Speaker 2>maximizes the entropy.

407
00:20:28.480 --> 00:20:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and nature doesn't maximize entropy out of some cosmic

408
00:20:32.039 --> 00:20:36.079
<v Speaker 3>desire for chaos. It happens purely through probability. If a

409
00:20:36.119 --> 00:20:38.839
<v Speaker 3>mixed gas has a trillion times more microstates than a

410
00:20:38.880 --> 00:20:42.079
<v Speaker 3>separated gas, the system is going to statistically settle into

411
00:20:42.079 --> 00:20:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the mixed.

412
00:20:42.440 --> 00:20:45.200
<v Speaker 2>State because it's just overwhelmingly more likely. Right.

413
00:20:45.279 --> 00:20:48.519
<v Speaker 3>So, the researchers asked if nature always drifts toward the

414
00:20:48.599 --> 00:20:51.960
<v Speaker 3>highest entropy state simply because it is the most statistically probable.

415
00:20:52.279 --> 00:20:54.799
<v Speaker 3>Do black hole mergers do the exact same thing.

416
00:20:55.000 --> 00:20:58.640
<v Speaker 2>And their conjecture says yes. They propose that when these

417
00:20:58.640 --> 00:21:02.839
<v Speaker 2>two gravitational titans call the final remnant black hole isn't

418
00:21:02.880 --> 00:21:06.599
<v Speaker 2>determined by the microscopic step by step unspooling of space

419
00:21:06.640 --> 00:21:10.519
<v Speaker 2>time geometry like the supercomputers calculate, the final mass and

420
00:21:10.599 --> 00:21:13.200
<v Speaker 2>spin of the remnant is simply whatever mass and spin

421
00:21:13.720 --> 00:21:17.880
<v Speaker 2>yields the absolute highest possible entropy, taking into account the

422
00:21:18.000 --> 00:21:19.000
<v Speaker 2>energy that was lost.

423
00:21:19.359 --> 00:21:22.279
<v Speaker 3>The energy loss is the critical variable here. When the

424
00:21:22.279 --> 00:21:24.839
<v Speaker 3>gas is mixed in a closed box, energy is perfectly

425
00:21:24.839 --> 00:21:27.599
<v Speaker 3>conserved within the box. But a black hole merger is

426
00:21:27.640 --> 00:21:30.880
<v Speaker 3>not a closed box. As we discussed earlier, a massive

427
00:21:30.920 --> 00:21:33.720
<v Speaker 3>amount of energy and angular momentum is blasted out into

428
00:21:33.720 --> 00:21:36.599
<v Speaker 3>the universe as gravitational waves during the inspiral and the

429
00:21:36.680 --> 00:21:37.559
<v Speaker 3>Quasini mo ringing.

430
00:21:37.920 --> 00:21:40.319
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the angular momentum loss because it is

431
00:21:40.400 --> 00:21:44.079
<v Speaker 2>fascinating how a gravitational wave can carry away spin like

432
00:21:44.160 --> 00:21:46.799
<v Speaker 2>I can visualize a wave carrying away raw energy, like

433
00:21:46.839 --> 00:21:49.720
<v Speaker 2>a ripple carrying away the impact energy of a stone

434
00:21:49.799 --> 00:21:52.240
<v Speaker 2>dropped in a pond. But how does a ripple in

435
00:21:52.279 --> 00:21:55.319
<v Speaker 2>space time carry away the rotational momentum of the black holes.

436
00:21:55.640 --> 00:21:58.960
<v Speaker 3>It takes a little visualization. Think about the geometry of

437
00:21:58.960 --> 00:22:02.559
<v Speaker 3>the waves themselves. Because the black holes are orbiting each other.

438
00:22:03.000 --> 00:22:07.480
<v Speaker 3>The gravitational waves they emit are not perfectly symmetrical expanding spheres.

439
00:22:07.519 --> 00:22:09.279
<v Speaker 2>They're not just expanding out like a balloon.

440
00:22:09.400 --> 00:22:13.680
<v Speaker 3>No, they are emitted in a spiral pattern heavily influenced

441
00:22:13.680 --> 00:22:17.039
<v Speaker 3>by the orbital mechanics of the binary system. As these

442
00:22:17.119 --> 00:22:21.440
<v Speaker 3>ripples propagate outward, they physically twist the space time they

443
00:22:21.480 --> 00:22:22.039
<v Speaker 3>pass through.

444
00:22:22.160 --> 00:22:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, they twist space itself.

445
00:22:24.640 --> 00:22:29.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that twisting motion requires angular momentum. By twisting the

446
00:22:29.960 --> 00:22:33.680
<v Speaker 3>surrounding universe, the waves are literally sapping rotational energy from

447
00:22:33.720 --> 00:22:36.720
<v Speaker 3>the merging black holes and carrying it away into the void.

448
00:22:36.839 --> 00:22:39.039
<v Speaker 2>So the Penza team has to account for all of this.

449
00:22:39.759 --> 00:22:42.000
<v Speaker 2>They know the starting mass and spin of the two

450
00:22:42.039 --> 00:22:45.119
<v Speaker 2>original black holes. They know they have to subtract the

451
00:22:45.160 --> 00:22:48.079
<v Speaker 2>mass and spin that is carried away by the gravitational waves.

452
00:22:48.640 --> 00:22:50.839
<v Speaker 2>And to find the final state, they need to find

453
00:22:50.839 --> 00:22:55.519
<v Speaker 2>the configuration that maximizes entropy under those specific conditions. How

454
00:22:55.519 --> 00:22:57.839
<v Speaker 2>did they actually execute this test? How do you map

455
00:22:57.839 --> 00:22:58.720
<v Speaker 2>this mathematically?

456
00:22:58.880 --> 00:23:03.440
<v Speaker 3>They constructed a methodology based on hypothetical states, because you know,

457
00:23:03.920 --> 00:23:07.279
<v Speaker 3>they couldn't just assume their thermodynamic theory was correct from

458
00:23:07.319 --> 00:23:10.440
<v Speaker 3>the jump. They needed to compare it against the deterministic

459
00:23:10.519 --> 00:23:14.279
<v Speaker 3>results generated by those massive numerical relativity.

460
00:23:13.640 --> 00:23:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Supercomputers gold standard, right, So.

461
00:23:15.960 --> 00:23:19.599
<v Speaker 3>They took the initial parameters of a known simulated merger.

462
00:23:20.240 --> 00:23:25.599
<v Speaker 3>Then they mathematically generated a sequence of hypothetical remnant black holes.

463
00:23:25.759 --> 00:23:28.119
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean by a sequence of hypothetical remnants?

464
00:23:28.200 --> 00:23:31.559
<v Speaker 3>Imagine a graph the researchers know a certain amount of

465
00:23:31.680 --> 00:23:34.720
<v Speaker 3>energy and angular momentum is going to be radiated away,

466
00:23:34.920 --> 00:23:38.799
<v Speaker 3>so they created a mathematical spectrum of possible final black holes,

467
00:23:38.839 --> 00:23:42.359
<v Speaker 3>each with slightly different combinations of final mass and final

468
00:23:42.400 --> 00:23:46.160
<v Speaker 3>skin that still obey the basic laws of conservation.

469
00:23:45.720 --> 00:23:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Like a lineup of possible suspects.

470
00:23:47.440 --> 00:23:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, and for every single one of those hypothetical black

471
00:23:50.680 --> 00:23:54.480
<v Speaker 3>holes on the spectrum, they calculated its thermodynamic entropy using

472
00:23:54.519 --> 00:23:56.839
<v Speaker 3>the Bickenstein Hawking formula.

473
00:23:56.279 --> 00:23:58.519
<v Speaker 2>So they're essentially looking for the peak of a curve.

474
00:23:59.240 --> 00:24:02.200
<v Speaker 2>They map out the entropy for all the possible final states,

475
00:24:02.519 --> 00:24:05.960
<v Speaker 2>looking for the specific mass and spin combination that represents

476
00:24:06.000 --> 00:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>the absolute highest entropy, the ultimate thermodynamic sweet spot for

477
00:24:10.119 --> 00:24:11.400
<v Speaker 2>that specific collision.

478
00:24:11.480 --> 00:24:15.119
<v Speaker 3>Precisely, they charted the entropy evolution, accounting for the fluxes

479
00:24:15.119 --> 00:24:18.519
<v Speaker 3>of energy and angular momentum being radiated to infinity by

480
00:24:18.519 --> 00:24:21.759
<v Speaker 3>the gravitational waves. They watched the curve rise as the

481
00:24:21.799 --> 00:24:25.920
<v Speaker 3>system evolved, looking for the apex the maximum entropy state, and.

482
00:24:25.880 --> 00:24:29.079
<v Speaker 2>The results they found are the core of this entire revelation.

483
00:24:29.839 --> 00:24:32.640
<v Speaker 2>When they found that peak, the hypothetical black hole with

484
00:24:32.680 --> 00:24:36.000
<v Speaker 2>the highest possible entropy, they compared its mass and spin

485
00:24:36.039 --> 00:24:39.039
<v Speaker 2>to the mass and spin calculated by the grueling, weeks

486
00:24:39.079 --> 00:24:43.519
<v Speaker 2>long supercomputer simulation, and the values matched. The entropy curve

487
00:24:43.559 --> 00:24:47.119
<v Speaker 2>peaked at virtually the exact same mass and angular momentum

488
00:24:47.160 --> 00:24:48.920
<v Speaker 2>predicted by numerical relativity.

489
00:24:49.039 --> 00:24:53.559
<v Speaker 3>The agreement was absolutely staggering. To bypass the microscopic geometric

490
00:24:53.599 --> 00:24:57.400
<v Speaker 3>tracking entirely, to rely purely on the statistical laws of thermodynamics,

491
00:24:57.599 --> 00:24:59.279
<v Speaker 3>and to land on the same target. It is a

492
00:24:59.319 --> 00:25:01.319
<v Speaker 3>profoundalidation of the conjecture.

493
00:25:01.519 --> 00:25:04.039
<v Speaker 2>Now I have to challenge this here because the literature

494
00:25:04.079 --> 00:25:06.799
<v Speaker 2>notes that the values matched, but they matched within a

495
00:25:06.839 --> 00:25:08.880
<v Speaker 2>margin of air of a few percent. You're saying they

496
00:25:08.880 --> 00:25:11.960
<v Speaker 2>got within a few percent. But in astrophysics, a few

497
00:25:12.000 --> 00:25:15.440
<v Speaker 2>percent can be a massive discrepancy. I mean, a few

498
00:25:15.440 --> 00:25:18.799
<v Speaker 2>percent error in an orbital calculation can mean a satellite

499
00:25:18.839 --> 00:25:21.759
<v Speaker 2>misses Mars entirely and shoots off into deep space.

500
00:25:21.880 --> 00:25:22.599
<v Speaker 3>That's very true.

501
00:25:22.680 --> 00:25:24.920
<v Speaker 2>So why should we accept a few percent margin of

502
00:25:25.039 --> 00:25:28.680
<v Speaker 2>error as a stunning victory here when numerical relativity gives

503
00:25:28.720 --> 00:25:30.319
<v Speaker 2>us a much more precise number.

504
00:25:30.640 --> 00:25:33.079
<v Speaker 3>That is a highly valid critique, and it is one

505
00:25:33.160 --> 00:25:37.319
<v Speaker 3>the physics community wrestles with the thermodynamic calculation is not

506
00:25:37.440 --> 00:25:41.440
<v Speaker 3>currently a replacement for numerical relativity when we need absolute

507
00:25:41.880 --> 00:25:46.519
<v Speaker 3>pinpoint precision for observational templates, like for Lego, right like

508
00:25:46.559 --> 00:25:49.359
<v Speaker 3>when the Lego observatories are trying to match a specific

509
00:25:49.400 --> 00:25:52.839
<v Speaker 3>gravitational wave signal to a real world source. But you

510
00:25:52.960 --> 00:25:56.960
<v Speaker 3>have to separate the practical utility from the theoretical revelation. The

511
00:25:57.039 --> 00:26:00.880
<v Speaker 3>few percent discrepancy likely arises from the approx animations required

512
00:26:00.880 --> 00:26:02.400
<v Speaker 3>to model the radiation.

513
00:26:02.039 --> 00:26:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Flexes the exhaust.

514
00:26:03.319 --> 00:26:07.359
<v Speaker 3>Basically, yes, the exact amount of energy and spin carried

515
00:26:07.400 --> 00:26:10.079
<v Speaker 3>away by the waves during the most chaotic fractions of

516
00:26:10.119 --> 00:26:13.680
<v Speaker 3>a millisecond. We don't have perfect analytical models for that

517
00:26:13.680 --> 00:26:15.480
<v Speaker 3>split second of peak chaos.

518
00:26:15.680 --> 00:26:19.559
<v Speaker 2>So the error isn't in the thermodynamic principle itself. The

519
00:26:19.680 --> 00:26:23.119
<v Speaker 2>error is in how accurately we are measuring the exhaust

520
00:26:23.200 --> 00:26:24.519
<v Speaker 2>of the collision exactly.

521
00:26:25.119 --> 00:26:27.960
<v Speaker 3>The fact that the maximum entropy principle gets us within

522
00:26:28.000 --> 00:26:31.319
<v Speaker 3>a few percent of the deterministic calculation is not a

523
00:26:31.359 --> 00:26:35.880
<v Speaker 3>failure of precision. It is proof of a fundamental underlying mechanism.

524
00:26:36.319 --> 00:26:39.680
<v Speaker 3>It proves that the universe is actually obeying these statistical laws,

525
00:26:39.799 --> 00:26:42.480
<v Speaker 3>even in the most extreme gravitational environments.

526
00:26:42.720 --> 00:26:44.440
<v Speaker 2>I want to try an analogy here to see if

527
00:26:44.480 --> 00:26:46.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm fully grasping the magnitude of this. Let's say I

528
00:26:46.759 --> 00:26:48.680
<v Speaker 2>want to figure out the exact shape and layout of

529
00:26:48.680 --> 00:26:51.720
<v Speaker 2>a shattered glass vase after dropping it off of building.

530
00:26:52.200 --> 00:26:56.839
<v Speaker 2>The numerical relativity approach is like tracking the exact aerodynamic trajectory, mass,

531
00:26:56.839 --> 00:27:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and velocity of every single shard of glass as it falls,

532
00:27:00.039 --> 00:27:02.119
<v Speaker 2>uding how they deflect off each other in mid air,

533
00:27:02.400 --> 00:27:04.960
<v Speaker 2>and plotting exactly where they land on the pavement.

534
00:27:04.680 --> 00:27:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Which is impossibly complex, a perfect description of the deterministic approach, right.

535
00:27:09.039 --> 00:27:11.799
<v Speaker 2>But the thermodynamic approach they just tested is like ignoring

536
00:27:11.839 --> 00:27:15.039
<v Speaker 2>the shards completely. Instead, you just measure the total kinetic

537
00:27:15.119 --> 00:27:17.559
<v Speaker 2>energy of the vase before it dropped, measure the total

538
00:27:17.559 --> 00:27:20.559
<v Speaker 2>heat generated when it hit the ground, and use statistical

539
00:27:20.599 --> 00:27:23.640
<v Speaker 2>probability to deduce that the shards must have arranged themselves

540
00:27:23.680 --> 00:27:27.440
<v Speaker 2>in the specific pattern that maximizes the entropy of the impact,

541
00:27:27.880 --> 00:27:30.000
<v Speaker 2>and you get almost the exact same layout.

542
00:27:30.359 --> 00:27:34.119
<v Speaker 3>That analogy captures the essence of the breakthrough beautifully. You

543
00:27:34.160 --> 00:27:38.880
<v Speaker 3>are swapping a microscopic geometric tracking problem for a macroscopic

544
00:27:38.960 --> 00:27:43.160
<v Speaker 3>thermodynamic state problem by verifying that the final black hole

545
00:27:43.240 --> 00:27:47.279
<v Speaker 3>remnant corresponds to the state of maximum entropy. The researchers

546
00:27:47.319 --> 00:27:50.039
<v Speaker 3>have essentially proven that the violent dynamics of space time

547
00:27:50.079 --> 00:27:53.680
<v Speaker 3>geometry are fundamentally constrained by the same statistical laws that

548
00:27:53.759 --> 00:27:55.039
<v Speaker 3>govern heat and gases.

549
00:27:55.359 --> 00:27:58.480
<v Speaker 2>This circles back to the concept of cosmic amnesia, or

550
00:27:58.519 --> 00:28:01.759
<v Speaker 2>what the void remembers. When those two black holes merge,

551
00:28:02.039 --> 00:28:05.880
<v Speaker 2>the resulting remnant forgets the intricate geometry of the collision entirely.

552
00:28:06.519 --> 00:28:09.279
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't retain any memory of the specific pads the

553
00:28:09.279 --> 00:28:11.480
<v Speaker 2>event horizons took as they twisted together.

554
00:28:11.680 --> 00:28:12.559
<v Speaker 3>It just lets it all go.

555
00:28:12.960 --> 00:28:15.839
<v Speaker 2>The universe essentially says, you know, that was too chaotic

556
00:28:15.880 --> 00:28:18.039
<v Speaker 2>to keep track of. Let's just default to the most

557
00:28:18.039 --> 00:28:22.640
<v Speaker 2>statistically probable state. The black hole sheds all that complex

558
00:28:22.680 --> 00:28:26.799
<v Speaker 2>geometric information through the ringing of gravitational waves, driving itself

559
00:28:26.839 --> 00:28:31.079
<v Speaker 2>toward maximum entropy until only mass and spin remain.

560
00:28:31.000 --> 00:28:36.799
<v Speaker 3>Which forces physicists to grapple with a monumental question. Bssatya Prakash,

561
00:28:37.039 --> 00:28:40.039
<v Speaker 3>one of the leading researchers on this project, highlighted that

562
00:28:40.079 --> 00:28:43.839
<v Speaker 3>this intersection goes far beyond our established models. We have

563
00:28:43.880 --> 00:28:47.440
<v Speaker 3>always treated thermodynamics as a consequence of particles moving around

564
00:28:47.440 --> 00:28:50.599
<v Speaker 3>in space time. But if spacetime itself in the form

565
00:28:50.680 --> 00:28:54.720
<v Speaker 3>of a purely geometric black hole based thermodynamics, it suggests

566
00:28:54.720 --> 00:28:55.519
<v Speaker 3>something deeper.

567
00:28:56.000 --> 00:28:58.640
<v Speaker 2>It suggests that the fabric of reality isn't just the

568
00:28:58.680 --> 00:29:01.960
<v Speaker 2>stage where physics happens. The fabric itself is governed by

569
00:29:02.000 --> 00:29:03.160
<v Speaker 2>statistical mechanics.

570
00:29:03.440 --> 00:29:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Could entropy maximization be the fundamental organizing principle of the universe.

571
00:29:07.680 --> 00:29:10.079
<v Speaker 3>It is a question that flips our understanding of gravity

572
00:29:10.079 --> 00:29:12.920
<v Speaker 3>on its head. There is a growing movement in theoretical

573
00:29:12.920 --> 00:29:16.519
<v Speaker 3>physics right now, pioneered by people like Eric Verlynn, suggesting

574
00:29:16.559 --> 00:29:18.680
<v Speaker 3>that gravity might not be a fundamental force at all.

575
00:29:18.880 --> 00:29:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Wait, not a fundamental force.

576
00:29:20.720 --> 00:29:24.559
<v Speaker 3>No, Instead, gravity might be an emergent phenomenon, a byproduct

577
00:29:24.640 --> 00:29:28.279
<v Speaker 3>of the universe constantly trying to maximize its entropy. This

578
00:29:28.319 --> 00:29:32.279
<v Speaker 3>research from Penn State provides incredibly compelling mathematical evidence that

579
00:29:32.319 --> 00:29:35.240
<v Speaker 3>such a connection exists at the most extreme scales.

580
00:29:35.559 --> 00:29:38.319
<v Speaker 2>That is a staggering paradigm shift if you are a

581
00:29:38.319 --> 00:29:41.680
<v Speaker 2>physicist who has spent your entire career looking at general

582
00:29:41.720 --> 00:29:46.559
<v Speaker 2>relativity as the absolute bedrock of gravitational physics. Seeing evidence

583
00:29:46.599 --> 00:29:49.920
<v Speaker 2>that relativity might just be a macroscopic side effect of

584
00:29:50.039 --> 00:29:53.519
<v Speaker 2>thermodynamics that must be both terrifying and exhilarating.

585
00:29:53.799 --> 00:29:56.039
<v Speaker 3>It's the kind of discovery that paves the way toward

586
00:29:56.119 --> 00:29:59.319
<v Speaker 3>a unified theory of quantum gravity. By showing that the

587
00:29:59.319 --> 00:30:03.119
<v Speaker 3>deterministic equations of Einstein and the statistical equations of Boltzmann

588
00:30:03.240 --> 00:30:06.799
<v Speaker 3>arrive at the exact same destination, we are slowly peeling

589
00:30:06.839 --> 00:30:09.720
<v Speaker 3>back the layers of the illusion. The universe doesn't have

590
00:30:09.759 --> 00:30:12.400
<v Speaker 3>a separate rulebook for black holes and a separate rule

591
00:30:12.440 --> 00:30:15.920
<v Speaker 3>book for hot gases. There is one underlying architecture.

592
00:30:16.160 --> 00:30:19.240
<v Speaker 2>This completely reframes how we look at the cosmos. We

593
00:30:19.319 --> 00:30:23.599
<v Speaker 2>started this discussion visualizing the most violent, unimaginable event in nature,

594
00:30:24.079 --> 00:30:28.160
<v Speaker 2>two massive singularities ripping through the fabric of space, unleashing

595
00:30:28.200 --> 00:30:30.720
<v Speaker 2>more energy than the rest of the visible universe combined.

596
00:30:31.480 --> 00:30:33.200
<v Speaker 2>It is so easy to look at an event like

597
00:30:33.240 --> 00:30:35.359
<v Speaker 2>that and think it belongs to a realm of physics

598
00:30:35.480 --> 00:30:39.680
<v Speaker 2>completely alien to human experience, a realm of hyper complex

599
00:30:39.839 --> 00:30:42.279
<v Speaker 2>tensor calculus and abstract geometry.

600
00:30:42.400 --> 00:30:45.559
<v Speaker 3>But the reality uncovered by this research is far more elegant.

601
00:30:45.279 --> 00:30:48.839
<v Speaker 2>Elegant, and almost poetic. The forces that dictate the violent

602
00:30:48.920 --> 00:30:51.680
<v Speaker 2>birth of a new black hole. Are the exact same

603
00:30:51.799 --> 00:30:54.400
<v Speaker 2>forces that dictate why a drop of ink disperses in

604
00:30:54.440 --> 00:30:57.440
<v Speaker 2>a glass of water. It is all driven by nature's

605
00:30:57.440 --> 00:31:01.759
<v Speaker 2>inescapable march toward maximum entropy. If the most extreme light

606
00:31:01.799 --> 00:31:04.480
<v Speaker 2>crushing objects in the cosmos are ultimately bowing to the

607
00:31:04.519 --> 00:31:08.119
<v Speaker 2>exact same statistical laws that dictate the everyday thermodynamics of

608
00:31:08.119 --> 00:31:11.039
<v Speaker 2>our lives, the universe is far more unified and far

609
00:31:11.119 --> 00:31:14.759
<v Speaker 2>more deeply interconnected than we ever dared to imagine. It

610
00:31:14.839 --> 00:31:16.799
<v Speaker 2>proves that whether you are looking at a messy room,

611
00:31:16.839 --> 00:31:19.920
<v Speaker 2>a cooling cup of coffee, or the collision of gravitational titans,

612
00:31:20.319 --> 00:31:22.680
<v Speaker 2>you are watching the exact same invisible hand at work.

613
00:31:22.880 --> 00:31:27.079
<v Speaker 3>It is a remarkable testament to the universality of physical laws.

614
00:31:27.319 --> 00:31:30.880
<v Speaker 2>It truly is. It's a reminder that the deepest mysteries

615
00:31:30.880 --> 00:31:34.640
<v Speaker 2>of the universe might not be solved by building bigger supercomputers,

616
00:31:34.960 --> 00:31:37.440
<v Speaker 2>but by recognizing the patterns that have been sitting in

617
00:31:37.440 --> 00:31:40.400
<v Speaker 2>front of us the entire time. Thank you for joining

618
00:31:40.440 --> 00:31:43.519
<v Speaker 2>us on this journey today. Keep questioning the universe around you,

619
00:31:43.559 --> 00:31:45.440
<v Speaker 2>and never stop looking for the hidden rules that bind

620
00:31:45.440 --> 00:31:46.079
<v Speaker 2>it all together.
