Speaker 1: Attention. You're listening to the top Huff Radio show, America's
Speaker 1: home for conservative not bitter talk radio. Be advised. The
Speaker 1: content of this program has been documented to prevent and
Speaker 1: even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
Speaker 1: to the right. Here's your Conservative but not Bitter host
Speaker 1: Tod Huff.
Speaker 2: All right, my friends, we are added here today. We
Speaker 2: got a lot of things in the stack of stuff
Speaker 2: I want to get to. In fact, today might be,
Speaker 2: I'm gonna say, mind, might be a little bit different
Speaker 2: than many days. I plan on touching on a lot
Speaker 2: of different things today. There's a lot of things that
Speaker 2: that are in the news out there, of course we've
Speaker 2: been talking about. There's just a lot of things to
Speaker 2: cover and some things I want to spend more time on,
Speaker 2: and so we do. So today I want to just
Speaker 2: I think, hit a whole myriad of things that are
Speaker 2: out there, and so that's what my plan is today.
Speaker 2: I of course reserve the right to spend a little
Speaker 2: time on any and all of these issues as I
Speaker 2: see fit, as the well as the dialogue demands. So
Speaker 2: that's what we're going to do this morning. A lot
Speaker 2: of stuff. By the way, if you want to see
Speaker 2: what's in the stack of stuff. You can do that
Speaker 2: by simply going to the website Todtefshow dot com and
Speaker 2: go to the stack of Stuff. Hat tip to the
Speaker 2: late great Rush Limbaugh on borrowing his term. Before we
Speaker 2: get rollin though, today, I want to remind you, if
Speaker 2: you are currently a smoker, if you chew tobacco, if
Speaker 2: you vape, Nick Knack Naturals is here to help you
Speaker 2: crush your vice. They have created a mint. This is
Speaker 2: a nicotine meant that means that if you are not
Speaker 2: currently using nicotine, my friends, this product is not for you.
Speaker 2: But if you are using nicotine and you're looking for
Speaker 2: a cleaner, naturally better alternative to things like smoking and
Speaker 2: chewing and the messiness that comes with that, right, you
Speaker 2: got the smoke, the odors, the spitting, the spit cans,
Speaker 2: the slimy pouches, the bad breath, the cigarette breaks, all
Speaker 2: this sort of stuff. If you're looking for a better alternative,
Speaker 2: check out nick knack dot com. That's in ic nac
Speaker 2: nicknack dot com. Use my name Todd at checkout. You're
Speaker 2: gonna save fifteen percent off your purchase. Nickknack dot com
Speaker 2: promo code Todd so as I mentioned a lot of things,
Speaker 2: I want to get to here today, but I actually
Speaker 2: want to start with a series of tweets, A series
Speaker 2: of tweets that vivek Ramaswame sent out here a couple
Speaker 2: of days ago. It was later later last week. It's
Speaker 2: something that I saw last week, but I just wasn't
Speaker 2: unable to get to as we were talking about other
Speaker 2: things here on this program, I want to talk about this.
Speaker 2: I like, First of all, I know some of you
Speaker 2: don't like the vek I personally do like the vek Ramaswami.
Speaker 2: I thought Trump might have been well suited. Again, this
Speaker 2: is not Please don't misunderstand. This is not a slap
Speaker 2: at jd Vance or anything. But I I thought the
Speaker 2: vek Ramaswami could have been a very good vice presidential candidate.
Speaker 2: Trump of course chose jd Vance. That's fine. I'm still
Speaker 2: I'm still learning and you know, developing my thoughts on him.
Speaker 2: But honestly, as it is with most people, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 2: I mean, Trump is the guy that we should have
Speaker 2: been supporting and need to support definitely now as this
Speaker 2: is a two person race between Kamala and and Trump,
Speaker 2: presumably Trump common I talked with someone yesterday who said,
Speaker 2: I'm not convinced that she's still going to be the nominee.
Speaker 2: There's a chance that that is is true. I don't.
Speaker 2: I mean, at this point, I think there's a single
Speaker 2: digit chance that she's not going to be the nominee,
Speaker 2: maybe even a fraction of a percentage chance that she
Speaker 2: won't be the nominee. But nonetheless, in fact, voting starts,
Speaker 2: does it. They're going to start their virtual they're virtual
Speaker 2: convention here August first, that's just a couple of days away. So,
Speaker 2: but as we head into the election, the Vek Ramaswami
Speaker 2: takes to x if I say Twitter, my well, forgive
Speaker 2: me Elon Musk. That's old habits are hard to break here.
Speaker 2: But the that Ramaswami takes to x and posts this
Speaker 2: and I want to talk about this, I think these
Speaker 2: conversations are well, first of all, interesting and good to
Speaker 2: be had. I actually agree with a lot of what
Speaker 2: Ramaswami says. He's a very intelligent, very artic, very well,
Speaker 2: you know, very thoughtful, knows the issues, highly intelligent. Just
Speaker 2: I think of all the people that entered or participated
Speaker 2: in the primary process that were Republicans, I think the
Speaker 2: only one. And I'm pausing to think if there's anybody
Speaker 2: that I would anyone else I would say benefited from it.
Speaker 2: I think he did. I think he benefited just from
Speaker 2: the national attention that he was able to garner that
Speaker 2: he really hadn't had prior to that. DeSantis did not
Speaker 2: benefit from this. Mike Pence obviously did not benefit from this.
Speaker 2: Nikki Hayley did not benefit from this. Obviously, Chris Christie did,
Speaker 2: and whoever else. And I just think he's the one
Speaker 2: that did. Ronis swam And if you remember when we
Speaker 2: talked and I talked about this at the time, the
Speaker 2: way he ran that campaign was brilliant. He didn't come
Speaker 2: in as an anti Trump sort of feeling guy. He
Speaker 2: didn't come in to destroy the name and brand of Trump.
Speaker 2: He came in, actually in a lot of ways as
Speaker 2: Trump's defender. And he said, I just happen to think
Speaker 2: that I could do a better job, which I think
Speaker 2: is perfectly fine and the right way to go about it.
Speaker 2: And I think the success or where he stands at
Speaker 2: the after the primary season proves that to have been
Speaker 2: the case for him, while the others have taken a
Speaker 2: major hit to their political ambitions, some of them never
Speaker 2: probably able to walk back up onto that debate stage again.
Speaker 2: So but he posts this on X a couple of
Speaker 2: days ago, it was last week. This is what he says,
Speaker 2: Time for our side talking to Republicans to wake up
Speaker 2: and to some hard realities fast. So he's got three
Speaker 2: points here that he wants to communicate. Now. I want
Speaker 2: to talk about these because I think they're relevant. I
Speaker 2: agree with Roamaswami in so far as these are relevant
Speaker 2: points to be made, to be had conversations that we
Speaker 2: must engage in. Number one, stop calling on Biden to
Speaker 2: step down or to be forced out. That will just
Speaker 2: give Kamala all the benefits of running as an incumbent
Speaker 2: US president, and she won't be any better for America
Speaker 2: in the next five months than Biden will be. Okay,
Speaker 2: So in a sense, he's certainly right, correct. I mean,
Speaker 2: if she's if you view life through the campaign, and
Speaker 2: this is where I don't see this this way. I
Speaker 2: understand his point, I understand the consequence. This is where
Speaker 2: I'm different than a politician. To me, it's about principle
Speaker 2: and value. We have a guy that's running the country
Speaker 2: who we all can now agree, even Democrats. Democrats can
Speaker 2: now agree this guy is so mentally incapable of even
Speaker 2: running for president, let alone being president. There are real,
Speaker 2: absolutely real risks to Biden being our commander in chief today.
Speaker 2: I understand that. To me, this has nothing to do.
Speaker 2: This has literally nothing to do my belief that Biden
Speaker 2: should resign. I think Biden should resign, should he be
Speaker 2: forced out. I mean, I don't know. The only way
Speaker 2: that that's going to happen is if there's will amongst
Speaker 2: the Democrats for that to happen. So the practical side
Speaker 2: of me says, I wouldn't. I don't know how much
Speaker 2: effort I would spend in doing this, other than just
Speaker 2: to say the guy is incapable. We are at a
Speaker 2: we're at risk here, right, And if you want to
Speaker 2: make it political, you can say, here's a candidate who's
Speaker 2: running for president, who's his current vice president, who, by
Speaker 2: the way, can invoke the twenty fifth Amendment with the
Speaker 2: majority of her cabinet support and or the majority support
Speaker 2: of Congress, and have Biden removed from office because he
Speaker 2: is incapable. But she's not doing that. She hasn't done that, right,
Speaker 2: by the way, And the stack of stuff, and this
Speaker 2: might be something we touch on as the program comes
Speaker 2: together here. But Obama is now reportedly the one who
Speaker 2: threatened to invoke the twenty fifth Amendment on Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: And that is what reports are, which is what ultimately
Speaker 2: forced Biden to resign, well, not to resign, but to
Speaker 2: drop out of the race. He's not resigning his current posts.
Speaker 2: They made that abundantly clear. This is all about the election.
Speaker 2: And see, I actually think this is this is how
Speaker 2: old fashioned I am. I think that we need people
Speaker 2: who are responsible currently leading the country. It's not just
Speaker 2: about the next the next election. It's about the current
Speaker 2: state of this country. Who who? Why? Why does no
Speaker 2: one think that I respect the heck out of Ramaswami.
Speaker 2: I understand that putting Kamala in the office of president
Speaker 2: for the final couple of months would technically make her
Speaker 2: the incumbent. I understand that having her as the president
Speaker 2: would then give Alan Lichtman, the professor who has his
Speaker 2: thirteen keys to winning the White House, one of those
Speaker 2: is the incumbency. I understand that that statistically makes someone
Speaker 2: more likely to be able to win the office again.
Speaker 2: I get all of that. I get all of that,
Speaker 2: I also understand that we are in the world. Did
Speaker 2: you see Lebanon? Americans have been ordered to evacuate Lebanon
Speaker 2: pretty much on their own good luck. By the way,
Speaker 2: how many times has this happened since Biden's been president?
Speaker 2: How many embassies have we had to evacuate? How many countries?
Speaker 2: The world is on fire? And no matter what anyone
Speaker 2: thinks about this, the person who ultimately has the final
Speaker 2: say and decision making abilities in this country on matters
Speaker 2: as it pertains to our national security and international affairs
Speaker 2: and potential wars and everything that's going on is Joseph
Speaker 2: Robinette Bribery, who is absolutely not qualified to be having
Speaker 2: this discussion. Well, Todd, of course, they've got people around him,
Speaker 2: and they're not listening to the guy who My friends,
Speaker 2: I just you have more faith in these folks than
Speaker 2: I do. The President makes a statement, makes a call
Speaker 2: to take certain action, whatever that might be. I don't know.
Speaker 2: The President makes a hard call regarding tensions that have
Speaker 2: built up in any number of places now, as the
Speaker 2: world's on fire, Russia, Ukraine, Hamas, Israel, China, as Trump
Speaker 2: would say, who knows right? Whatever's next? Lebanon now it's
Speaker 2: a I mean, they're very aggressive and launching missiles and
Speaker 2: so forth into Israel. I mean, it's a mess right
Speaker 2: across the world stage. I actually think I'm from the
Speaker 2: era of people who actually thought, believe that the person
Speaker 2: in the White House is kind of important for that.
Speaker 2: Remember the Cuban missile crisis in nineteen what was in
Speaker 2: nineteen sixty two? Can you imagine Biden dealing with something
Speaker 2: like that today? Would Kamalas step in? I mean, how
Speaker 2: do we know? What are the assurances here? Who's calling
Speaker 2: the shots? The same shadow government? I mean this, I
Speaker 2: don't know. He's got a point to be made about
Speaker 2: the political calculus here, But I still think principle matters.
Speaker 2: And this guy is clearly incapable of being commander in
Speaker 2: chief Joseph Robinett Bribery. So why is he still there?
Speaker 2: Is it just because of political ramifications. I've got a
Speaker 2: problem with that. I do, and I get it. I
Speaker 2: know you can say, what it's more important, let's risk
Speaker 2: our country, I guess for the next six months just
Speaker 2: to make sure that we can win easier in November.
Speaker 2: I don't know. I something doesn't set well with me
Speaker 2: about that number two. Stop attacking Kamala for locking up
Speaker 2: too many people. This is again vivak Rama Swabbing's tweet.
Speaker 2: If you're just now joining us giving instructions to Republicans
Speaker 2: on what to talk about or deal with or the
Speaker 2: realities they have to come to quickly. Number two, stop
Speaker 2: attacking Kamala for locking up too many people as a prosecutor.
Speaker 2: It lends credibility to the otherwise ridiculous claim that she's
Speaker 2: a law and order candidate. I mean that's I mean,
Speaker 2: I don't disagree with that. It's just interesting to me,
Speaker 2: you know my thoughts. Look, and I'm not in the
Speaker 2: business of politics. I remember hearing Rush talk about this.
Speaker 2: I'm not in the business of politics. I come on
Speaker 2: here to tell you what I think, to talk about
Speaker 2: these issues to balance, you know, what we're being told,
Speaker 2: the political ramifications, just the constitution, what makes sense from
Speaker 2: a purely logical perspective instead of just you know, saying
Speaker 2: we're going to do whatever we need to do to
Speaker 2: win an election, and all those things to be balanced
Speaker 2: and so forth. If Kamala was enforcing the law and
Speaker 2: doing her job as prosecutor, I don't I don't know
Speaker 2: why people would be talking about this. But I do
Speaker 2: know that there's you know, a lot of people that
Speaker 2: want to talk about the way that she handled some
Speaker 2: of these cases and the people who were in jail
Speaker 2: prison for marijuana crimes and that sort of stuff. I
Speaker 2: don't talk much about that. That doesn't really matter to me.
Speaker 2: What does matter to me are the allegations that she
Speaker 2: withheld evidence of someone who is convicted for a capital crime.
Speaker 2: That's that seems to be relevant. But I can agree
Speaker 2: largely with Vivic on this. I mean I don't again,
Speaker 2: I don't think about it as the from the perspective
Speaker 2: of what the political ramifications are. I just think about
Speaker 2: it from the perspective of what is true and relevant
Speaker 2: to the to the discourse number three, though he says
Speaker 2: this stops saying that Kamala covered up to help Biden
Speaker 2: while also saying that Kamala staged a coup to overthrow Biden.
Speaker 2: It doesn't make sense to say both at once. And
Speaker 2: if we say things that don't make sense, we will
Speaker 2: lose votes. I don't know that this doesn't make sense
Speaker 2: now in the same time, right, I mean, there's if
Speaker 2: you want to actually get into the to the nitty
Speaker 2: gritty here. You know, you'll hear people, for example, they'll
Speaker 2: say that there are contradictions in the Bible. You'll hear
Speaker 2: people say that there's contradictions, full of contradictions, the Bible
Speaker 2: is full of contradictions, when in reality, at best it
Speaker 2: could be viewed as an inconsistency. Now, something that is
Speaker 2: a contradiction is when something is claimed to be both
Speaker 2: the case and not the case in the same time. Right,
Speaker 2: So for example, you might, Okay, we got the Olympics
Speaker 2: going on. You might not be a big fan of
Speaker 2: say Lebron James, but maybe you're a big fan of
Speaker 2: Team USA. Maybe you watch them beat Nikola Jokic, who
Speaker 2: happens to be my favorite player who's not American. He
Speaker 2: plays on the Serbian team. Best player on the court,
Speaker 2: by the way, he and Lebron. I mean, I watched
Speaker 2: the game or some of the game the other day.
Speaker 2: So you might not be a Lebron fan. In the season,
Speaker 2: you might hate the Lakers, you might hate the Ans,
Speaker 2: he might whatever, but he gets on the team USA.
Speaker 2: America is playing other countries for the right to be
Speaker 2: the Golden Medalist, the champion basketball team men's basketball team
Speaker 2: in the world, and you might suddenly find yourself rooting
Speaker 2: a little bit for Lebron. I find myself in this situation.
Speaker 2: I'm not a big Lebron James fan. I think he's
Speaker 2: a tremendous talent. I think he's I mean, one of
Speaker 2: the best players, without question, that the world has ever seen.
Speaker 2: But I found myself rooting for Lebron, and I don't
Speaker 2: do this when it's the NBA. It drives me crazy.
Speaker 2: His antics and behavior and just I don't know I
Speaker 2: would even say the entitlement of Lebron, but regardless, I
Speaker 2: find myself rooting for him. Now you can say, then
Speaker 2: Vivek would say, well, either you're a fan or you're not. Well,
Speaker 2: I think in regular circumstances I'm not. But now that
Speaker 2: he's on Team USA, he's I'm a fan in the
Speaker 2: sense that I'm rooting for him because he's on our team.
Speaker 2: So I would say the same thing about Kamala here.
Speaker 2: So have you seen the polling. It's in the snack
Speaker 2: of stuff as well. The vast majority of people think
Speaker 2: that Kamala was involved in covering up Joseph Biden's mental
Speaker 2: state as as president. They didn't she was. She was
Speaker 2: one of the people, one of the people involved in
Speaker 2: covering it up. I don't think I think this is
Speaker 2: one hundred percent unavoidable. You cannot have been around Joseph
Speaker 2: robbin At Bribery for four years, the past four or
Speaker 2: five years, however long she's been with him now as
Speaker 2: his vice presidential Canada. You cannot have been with him
Speaker 2: all that time and not know that he is incapable
Speaker 2: of being commander in chief. You had to have you
Speaker 2: had to have been keeping secrets from the press, from
Speaker 2: the American people. This is an impossibility. I am comfortable
Speaker 2: telling you, while I have no direct insider knowledge, there
Speaker 2: is no way, there is no way that Kamala Harris
Speaker 2: did not know that Biden would much worse than people
Speaker 2: believed him to be. This was back, of course, before
Speaker 2: the debate, when she was telling us, oh man, this
Speaker 2: guy's sharp ass attack. You go in there to meetings,
Speaker 2: this guy rattling off questions, keeping you on your toes.
Speaker 2: People are afraid to approach him. I've never seen like
Speaker 2: FBI Director Christopher Radi other day before Congress. I think
Speaker 2: I played the SoundBite on here never seen doesn't know
Speaker 2: what would forget the person that was asking him the questions.
Speaker 2: But I had no idea, did no idea that this
Speaker 2: Joseph Biden guy had any mental decline whatsoever. Biden was
Speaker 2: on it. Oh it was Matt Gates. Yeah, this guy
Speaker 2: was just on his A game. Every time I talked
Speaker 2: with him. Nothing looked out out of sorts, blowney bulooney.
Speaker 2: I don't believe that for one second. And for Kamala
Speaker 2: to be there virtually, I don't every day that they
Speaker 2: see each other, but working closely with him on a
Speaker 2: very regular basis, ain't no way, my friends, that she
Speaker 2: didn't know that. Now to say that, which I think
Speaker 2: is undeniable, There is no way. There is no way
Speaker 2: you could work with Biden on any regular basis and
Speaker 2: not know that there's problems.
Speaker 1: One.
Speaker 2: It was that bad, and everybody listening to my voice
Speaker 2: knows it. We all know this. You and I knew
Speaker 2: this a long time before the media admitted think about
Speaker 2: that their guy. It was so bad they had to
Speaker 2: finally say, we can't defend this guy anymore. That's how
Speaker 2: bad it was. Now she could be involved in that
Speaker 2: and understand that that is the that's the candidate, that's
Speaker 2: the candidate that they're sticking with. That's their guy until
Speaker 2: the Democrat party power brokers tell her otherwise, until they
Speaker 2: make the decision. So she's a political opportunist. She's a
Speaker 2: political opportunist who says, I'm gonna sit here and deny
Speaker 2: and deflect and defend Joseph Biden until until the if
Speaker 2: and when right. Maybe it never was going to happen,
Speaker 2: but if they made the call that we've got to
Speaker 2: replace this guy, then she can absolutely and switch gears.
Speaker 2: What is inconsistent about this? I find this to be
Speaker 2: completely consistent. In fact, I would maintain that this is
Speaker 2: how this is how people in Washington, d C. Operate
Speaker 2: on a whole host of issues. They are on somebody's
Speaker 2: side until it is politically disadvantageous to be associated with
Speaker 2: that person, at which time they flip the switch and
Speaker 2: suddenly they put Planned B into action. Which I heard
Speaker 2: someone say Kamala. I hear someone say that Kamala is
Speaker 2: Biden's Democrats Plan BAN. I would say that that's an
Speaker 2: accurate statement Plan B. So I don't find that to
Speaker 2: be to not make sense. Now in a superficial way,
Speaker 2: when you state it this way and it says which
Speaker 2: is it? Is she someone who defended him or someone
Speaker 2: who tried to stage a coup against him. Well, if
Speaker 2: you're only gonna give me three seconds to respond, I
Speaker 2: cannot give the context to what I just said. So
Speaker 2: in that sense, it makes it hard to say she's
Speaker 2: both because that doesn't make sense, because it doesn't imply
Speaker 2: that there's a different, that there was a change, that
Speaker 2: there were things that are different now that the thumbs
Speaker 2: up were given by the Democrat power brokers to then
Speaker 2: switch the candidates. Anyway, you don't have to take a
Speaker 2: break care of my friends getting near the end of
Speaker 2: the segment. Are you tired though, of dry, irritated skin?
Speaker 2: And I know you're tired of big corporations. So that's
Speaker 2: why this year, this year you can support small, unwoke
Speaker 2: brands like ofp Farms. Ofp Farms is a family owned business,
Speaker 2: a god fearing business. They have a goat farm, my friends,
Speaker 2: a goat farm. You can check out the website. They
Speaker 2: got these products that they craft on their farm, small
Speaker 2: batch bath and body products. They've got some gift sets
Speaker 2: as the world as well, world famous gift sets. In fact,
Speaker 2: they've got one with Donald Trump of course, with that
Speaker 2: iconic picture of him after the failed assassination attempt. You
Speaker 2: can check out these gift boxes and their products. Support
Speaker 2: American made brands. Ditch the woke brands who are candidly
Speaker 2: supporting candidates and causes that you and I fight each
Speaker 2: and every day, and you can also feel the difference.
Speaker 2: Get a high quality product. I use the soap. It
Speaker 2: is very, very good quality soap. I love it. Visit
Speaker 2: ofpfarms dot com. Use my name Todd as the promo code.
Speaker 2: You're gonna say fifteen percent off your purchase ofp farms
Speaker 2: dot com. Promo code Todd. Quick time out, my friends,
Speaker 2: gonna take a break here. Come back. There's, like I said,
Speaker 2: plenty of things. I'm gonna shift gears. Move on from this,
Speaker 2: this tweet from VIVEC, this X post from Vivek, and
Speaker 2: move on to other things in the news today. In
Speaker 2: the meantime, sit tight, my friends. You're listening here to
Speaker 2: conservative not better talk. I am your host, the one,
Speaker 2: the only, the benevolent dictator here behind the microphone. Tot
Speaker 2: huff back in just a minute, Mac, my friend. So
Speaker 2: there's actually I know I told you and I am
Speaker 2: I'm going to shift gears here, but I want to
Speaker 2: finish reading the last few lines of the veak Ramaswami's
Speaker 2: post on x It says, our biggest risk isn't that
Speaker 2: voters will suddenly fall in love with Kamala. There's a
Speaker 2: reason I want to do this. There's an old op
Speaker 2: ed about Kamala Harris that I want to share with
Speaker 2: you today. I've I've stayed on this, stated on this
Speaker 2: program for some time that Kamala Harris is among the
Speaker 2: most unlikable politicians in well in America. I don't want
Speaker 2: to say the world. I don't know enough to state that,
Speaker 2: but she's one of the most unlikable and unpopular politicians
Speaker 2: generally that we have today. So he says that it's
Speaker 2: not our biggest risk, isn't that voters are going to
Speaker 2: suddenly fall in love with Kamala. He's right about this.
Speaker 2: She didn't even make make it her own parties, make
Speaker 2: it to her own parties Iowa Caucus because voters didn't
Speaker 2: like her. Despite fake enthusiasm. The media tried to generate
Speaker 2: around around her even back then. So yes, the Democrats,
Speaker 2: the media, the seven pillars of propaganda, they are always
Speaker 2: trying to generate this fake, fake buzz and excitement around
Speaker 2: the Democratic candidates and then of course create this feeling
Speaker 2: of angst and well, look at what they're doing to JD.
Speaker 2: Vans right now. And I'm not saying everything that I've
Speaker 2: I've got a lot of questions about JD. Evans candidly,
Speaker 2: but it's not it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter in
Speaker 2: the context of this of this election. But they're all,
Speaker 2: isn't it strange? The media is all using the phrase,
Speaker 2: this is a weird candidate. Weird. Everyone's saying that really weird, weird, weird, weird.
Speaker 2: No matter what where you turn, there's a montage of people,
Speaker 2: montage of people saying that the opposite happens. The media,
Speaker 2: the seven pillars of propaganda do the opposite for Democrat candidates.
Speaker 2: They hype them, They become their hype man, their pr firm,
Speaker 2: They carry the proverbial water for the Democrat Party. He's
Speaker 2: right about this. Our biggest risk, he said, is we
Speaker 2: get distracted and forget to offer our own vision for
Speaker 2: the future of the United States of America. I agree
Speaker 2: with this too, although I do think you have to
Speaker 2: be prepared to point out the problems with the other candidates,
Speaker 2: which I'm not saying I don't think he's saying that.
Speaker 2: But let's not get too much into the weeds here,
Speaker 2: where this just becomes well, what the media does to
Speaker 2: our candidates or to Republican candidates, that's not a it's
Speaker 2: not good for them, it's not good for us. I mean,
Speaker 2: I guess you could say it's effective, but at some
Speaker 2: point the tactics are just not something that I would
Speaker 2: want to engage in. That's me though, And I agree
Speaker 2: with Rama Swami here. What we're going to win this
Speaker 2: thing by defining who we are and what we actually
Speaker 2: stand for merit, free speech, self governance, the rule of law.
Speaker 2: So I agree with that part, and I don't look,
Speaker 2: I understand and what he's trying to say, We've got
Speaker 2: an election to win. Let's not talk about some of
Speaker 2: these things. Let's not get into the weeds. But I
Speaker 2: don't think some of these things are necessarily the weeds.
Speaker 2: And I think some of these things have a direct
Speaker 2: bearing on our safety and security today, which you can't
Speaker 2: just look to a future election. We have people today
Speaker 2: that are responsible for things that are going on in
Speaker 2: this country. In the case of Biden, he is completely
Speaker 2: incapable of fulfilling his role, his function, his obligations, his responsibilities.
Speaker 2: So is with that in mind that I want to
Speaker 2: shift gears. I want to shift gears too to This
Speaker 2: was in where is this Freebeacon dot com? Freebeacon dot com.
Speaker 2: This is in the stack of stuff for today. I
Speaker 2: can't This is Kamala. I just want you to hear this.
Speaker 2: This is the perspective. This actually was written by the
Speaker 2: father of one of her interns. I believe leave it's
Speaker 2: when she was the Attorney general for the state of California.
Speaker 2: So I believe the father of the intern who worked
Speaker 2: for Kamala worked for Kamala when she was attorney general.
Speaker 2: So this is the Washington Free Beacon writing about the
Speaker 2: op ed. This op ed was penned by a gentleman
Speaker 2: named Terry Mcatteer. It was written in twenty nineteen. Now
Speaker 2: Oz said, wait a minute, when was Kamala Senator? I said, no,
Speaker 2: this is when it was written. This is kind of
Speaker 2: like when you read the Bible and you realize that
Speaker 2: they're writing about something that happened previously. This is not
Speaker 2: written in real time. This is in twenty nineteen. This gentleman,
Speaker 2: with the permission of his son. According to According to him,
Speaker 2: used the stories his son had told him about serving
Speaker 2: under Kamala as attorney when she was Attorney General for
Speaker 2: the state of California. This he wrote this in twenty nineteen.
Speaker 2: Now Kamala was elected president. Excuse me, she whiz No, no,
Speaker 2: I can't even wipe that from the record. She was
Speaker 2: elected Senator of the state of California in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 2: So she served as senator from two thousand and what
Speaker 2: seventeen to twenty twenty one January of seventeenth to January
Speaker 2: of twenty one. Then she became vice president. She was
Speaker 2: attorney general. I don't have that date in front of me.
Speaker 2: So this was written several years after the fact that
Speaker 2: of her being attorney general. Anyway, here's the headline. Here's
Speaker 2: the headline of this. Don't look her in the eye.
Speaker 2: Father of Harris Intern recounts office horror stories. This is
Speaker 2: a quote leading into the article. For a woman of
Speaker 2: color to have employees stand where she enters the room
Speaker 2: smacks of a bygone era that we as Americans deplore
Speaker 2: and find demeaning. So this is written by the journalist
Speaker 2: at the Washington Free Beacon. But this is referencing the
Speaker 2: op ed that was written by Terry mcketteer five years
Speaker 2: ago in twenty nineteen. So here we go as California
Speaker 2: Attorney General Kamala Harris consistently berated staff members, instructed them
Speaker 2: to stand and call her general when she edited what
Speaker 2: is wrong with these people? When she entered the room,
Speaker 2: actually mean when she entered the office, and banned many
Speaker 2: of them from looking her in the eye. According to
Speaker 2: the father of one of Harris's former interns, I got
Speaker 2: a story for you. I can't tell you names. Honestly,
Speaker 2: I think I forget the name. But my my brother
Speaker 2: has a friend who owns a company, and the company
Speaker 2: is in the Los Angeles area, Beverly Hills area, Hollywood.
Speaker 2: Over there, Hollywood, you know. To me, remember I'm from
Speaker 2: the Midwest. I'm from smalltown USA. For those of you
Speaker 2: that live out there, that might I might have just
Speaker 2: opened up three distinctly different areas, But to me, that's
Speaker 2: one big area that's run by some crazy liberals and
Speaker 2: self righteous people in Hollywood. So this individual owns a
Speaker 2: company that would go in and take care of a
Speaker 2: problem that might exist within your home. And so he
Speaker 2: was called. His company was called to fix the problem,
Speaker 2: and it was a movie star, a well known If
Speaker 2: I said the person's name, well, there's one or two people,
Speaker 2: I can't remember which one it is, either one of them,
Speaker 2: whichever one that it actually is. Everybody knows these names
Speaker 2: very like top high quality, top of the line, you know,
Speaker 2: just as far as well known celebrity status. I'm not
Speaker 2: talking about anything else. I'm not talking about my opinion
Speaker 2: of them. I'm not talking about anything other than just
Speaker 2: how society or how Hollywood would would rank these folks.
Speaker 2: So they had to sign a paper saying that they
Speaker 2: wouldn't talk to this individual and they would not make
Speaker 2: eye contact with us. So when I read this, I'm like,
Speaker 2: my goodness, is this who Kamala is hanging out with
Speaker 2: these people who say, you can't even look at me?
Speaker 2: How dare you? You're beneath me so much that you
Speaker 2: cannot even look at me? What in the world is
Speaker 2: going on? As attorney general? And she wanted them to
Speaker 2: stand when she came into the office, probably late by
Speaker 2: the way, and call her general. What the world is
Speaker 2: she wanting them to salute her as well? Maybe it
Speaker 2: doesn't say that, but maybe the father going back to
Speaker 2: the article here. Terry Mcatteer penned a penn a twenty
Speaker 2: nineteen op ed recounting the horror stories from his son
Speaker 2: Gregory's short time as a public policy intern in Harris's
Speaker 2: Attorney General's office. Senator Harris vocally throws around F bombs
Speaker 2: and other profanity constantly, and her rating of staff and others.
Speaker 2: Mcatteer wrote, the staff is in complete fear of her
Speaker 2: and she and she uses profanity throughout the day. He continued.
Speaker 2: As Attorney General, Senator Harris instructed her entire staff to
Speaker 2: stand every morning as she entered the office and said,
Speaker 2: good morning, General. I can't I tell you what you
Speaker 2: want to entertain me? Send me something like this. This
Speaker 2: is I cannot even imagine what is wrong with these people.
Speaker 2: But never once during the month long internship did Harris
Speaker 2: introduced herself to our son, and staff was too intimidated
Speaker 2: by her to introduce him. Oh I love it, my friends.
Speaker 2: I'm going to continue with this at a minute, but
Speaker 2: let me tell you back here. A few months ago
Speaker 2: I've shared with you I started a weight loss journey.
Speaker 2: I'd gotten lazy, put on some pounds. Wasn't in the
Speaker 2: best of shape. I was an athlete in college. Those
Speaker 2: days are long long behind us, and I just decided,
Speaker 2: as i've you know, we have three kids, and I
Speaker 2: wanted to I wanted to be able to do things
Speaker 2: with them. But I was realizing, hey, man, I can't
Speaker 2: play basketball without sucking air if I played for more
Speaker 2: than twenty seconds. And so I thought, you know what,
Speaker 2: I'm tired of this. I don't want to not be
Speaker 2: able to participate in things with my kids, with my wife,
Speaker 2: with my family, and not be able to do it
Speaker 2: because it's something I can control. And so I started
Speaker 2: this weight loss journey with my PhD weight Loss. I've
Speaker 2: lost weight, my swelling in my knees, I've had two
Speaker 2: aco surgeries. Has I mean, I've not had my knees
Speaker 2: in this good as shape and probably ten years. I'm
Speaker 2: gonna guess I feel better. I've lost some weight. Everyone
Speaker 2: has their reasons for wanting to get healthy, and I'm
Speaker 2: guessing a lot of you have those reasons in your
Speaker 2: mind right now. Don't delay. I delayed. I was gonna
Speaker 2: do this in January. I waited until May. Check out
Speaker 2: my phdeweightloss dot com. Look at the testimonials. Take a
Speaker 2: look at it, see if it's something that might work
Speaker 2: for you. Reach out to have a conversation with them.
Speaker 2: My the word, my ny phdeweightloss dot com friends. When
Speaker 2: I get back from the break, I want to read
Speaker 2: a little bit more of this article about Kamala forcing
Speaker 2: her staff to salute her basically and to call her
Speaker 2: General Harris and to not look her in the eye.
Speaker 2: This is crazy stuff. Quick time out though, my friends
Speaker 2: here listening to a conservative not better talk. I'm your host,
Speaker 2: Todd Huff back in mirror moments, welcome back to my friends. Oz.
Speaker 2: That is right. I starts the video feed here in
Speaker 2: the office. And when she did, she doesn't always tell me.
Speaker 2: And I said, Oz, did you start the video feed?
Speaker 2: And she saluted General Todd Huff here in the studio
Speaker 2: she would fit in, well, would you salute Kamala? She
Speaker 2: would not salute. She saluted me with her left hand though,
Speaker 2: so I don't know if that's like a derogatory attempt there.
Speaker 2: But nonetheless, my friends, we're talking here about Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: This article. This op ed an old op ed from
Speaker 2: five years ago, talking about what life was like working
Speaker 2: under a Kamala Harris regime just when she was attorney general.
Speaker 2: If she was this big of an ego as attorney general,
Speaker 2: what on earth is she going to be like? Heaven
Speaker 2: forbid it. But what is she going to be like
Speaker 2: should she become president? Or what is she like even
Speaker 2: as vice president? Now Oz says, I don't know. I
Speaker 2: don't know. She says, I don't know if I believe this,
Speaker 2: and you know, look, I leave open the possibility that
Speaker 2: this individual is making this up. That's certainly a possibility.
Speaker 2: I believe this a lot more than I believe unnamed sources.
Speaker 2: Though unnamed sources are the way that people get information
Speaker 2: out that they want to get out there, to change
Speaker 2: the narrative or to throw a head fake or some
Speaker 2: such thing. So I don't know. I'm just sharing with
Speaker 2: you this, and I am thoroughly enjoying what I'm sharing
Speaker 2: with you because it is wildly entertaining. Who why would
Speaker 2: you be afraid? I just I just don't understand. I
Speaker 2: don't understand any of this. I don't understand being so
Speaker 2: intimidated you actually play along. I don't understand why you
Speaker 2: would have hung it, hung at you know, hung in
Speaker 2: there and completed the term as an intern. I would
Speaker 2: have said, forget this, I'm not working for this lunatic,
Speaker 2: and I would have left what is going on? I
Speaker 2: just this is so foreign to my way of thinking.
Speaker 2: So we'll get into what the rest of this piece
Speaker 2: here in a moment Before I do that, though, my friends,
Speaker 2: if you're looking for a natural health supplement, you take
Speaker 2: care of yourself, diet and exercise, you're looking for other
Speaker 2: ways to take care of your health, let me encourage
Speaker 2: you to check out z Stack. Z Stack is a
Speaker 2: trusted brand. It's been formulated by doctor Zelinko. They use
Speaker 2: ingredients that had been proven to work clinically. This product
Speaker 2: is made in the United States of America. They have
Speaker 2: a series of six formulations that you can find on
Speaker 2: their website Zstacklife dot com slash Todd and you can
Speaker 2: shop or you can read more about each of these
Speaker 2: products how they can help you supplement your health through
Speaker 2: these natural health supplements. Z Stack, also, by the way,
Speaker 2: is a company that actually loves this country, which is
Speaker 2: a novel concept that appears in twenty twenty four, and
Speaker 2: they have a record of fighting against well fighting in
Speaker 2: favor of medical freedom and against medical corruption. Zstaklife dot
Speaker 2: com slash Todd. That's the website. Use my name Todd
Speaker 2: at check out, You're going to save fifteen percent off
Speaker 2: your purchase. Z Stack empowering you to stay prepared, to
Speaker 2: stay safe, and to stay strong. So in the time
Speaker 2: we have remaining here this hour, let me get to
Speaker 2: the rest of this article. That's referencing a twenty nineteen
Speaker 2: op ed by a gentleman named Terry Mcatteer, whose son Gregory,
Speaker 2: served in the Attorney General office for the state of
Speaker 2: California when the Attorney General was Kamala Harris. Here we
Speaker 2: go looking up where she decided to use f bombs
Speaker 2: and profanity throughout the day. And perhaps my favorite part
Speaker 2: is when she came into the office in the morning,
Speaker 2: her staff was to stand and greet her and say
Speaker 2: good morning, General, And she didn't once introduce herself to
Speaker 2: their son, Gregory. And the staff was too intimidated, too
Speaker 2: intimidated by her to go up and say, hey, you
Speaker 2: got a new intern named Gregory here. No, you can't
Speaker 2: do that, they continue, or the well his father continues here.
Speaker 2: Gregory was also given instructions to never address Harris nor
Speaker 2: look her in the eye, as that as that privilege
Speaker 2: was only allowed to senior staff members. Oh yes, my friends,
Speaker 2: you want to look at her. You got to work
Speaker 2: your way up to senior staff. I don't know how
Speaker 2: you get there because you can't have any conversations with
Speaker 2: the boss previous to that. But nonetheless, that was how
Speaker 2: it worked, according to mccatteer. Here, he continues, I don't
Speaker 2: know about you, but this is not the workplace of
Speaker 2: someone who respects her staff or a woman of color
Speaker 2: to have employees. What does that matter? But anyway for
Speaker 2: a woman of color to have employees stand when she
Speaker 2: enters the room smacks of a bygone era that we
Speaker 2: as Americans deplore and find demeaning. Well, she's racially segregating
Speaker 2: her her voters, or they're racially segregating themselves. I've seen what.
Speaker 2: There's a group out there, white guys for Kamala I
Speaker 2: think is the that's all that matters to these people?
Speaker 2: Their race, their gender, their ethnicity. Check these things off
Speaker 2: the box, Check off the boxes to figure out to
Speaker 2: figure out how powerful your voice should be in this
Speaker 2: political discourse. Staff issues continued to haunt Harris. Now the
Speaker 2: presumptive I'm going back to the article here now in
Speaker 2: the present to Democratic presidential nominee as she rose to
Speaker 2: the Senate and Vice presidency. During Harris's first three years
Speaker 2: as vice president, her staff had a turnover rate of
Speaker 2: ninety two percent, and if this op ed is any
Speaker 2: indication of how she runs her office, then it's clear why.
Speaker 2: According to an open books investigation, Axios attributed that turnover
Speaker 2: to in part to burnout as where well as career
Speaker 2: harm by being too closely linked to a flag flagging operation.
Speaker 2: That's what this is, That's what that's anyway, they didn't
Speaker 2: want to be tied to something that was a train
Speaker 2: wreck basically, or to someone who apparently makes them stand.
Speaker 2: What would he if they still call her general standing
Speaker 2: salute her. I don't know, crazy times, my friends, I
Speaker 2: gotta go SDG