Speaker 1: Enough Tally Bennett, the former Israeli Prime minister said quote
Speaker 1: as a former Israeli Prime minister, with the MASAD having
Speaker 1: reported directly to me, I say to you with one
Speaker 1: hundred percent certainty, the accusation that Jeffrey Epstein somehow worked
Speaker 1: for Israel or the Masade running a blackmail ring is
Speaker 1: categorically and totally false. This accusation is a lie being
Speaker 1: peddled by prominent online personalities such as Tuck Macarlson, pretending
Speaker 1: they know things they don't, and in fact I followed
Speaker 1: up with the former prime minister enough Tally Bennett and
Speaker 1: what he told me is the MASAD has not been
Speaker 1: active in the United States since the or against the
Speaker 1: United States since the Jonathan Pollard scandal of nineteen eighty seven.
Speaker 2: When a US Army contractories that you're working to the Navy.
Speaker 3: There is no level ten decision you're gonna make that
Speaker 3: is gonna make everybody happy. It's not gonna happen, period.
Speaker 3: There is no way you saw it. With all the stuff,
Speaker 3: the Epstein case, the other things we had to deal with,
Speaker 3: there is no decision you're gonna make that is gonna
Speaker 3: make everybody happy. And you have to deal with it.
Speaker 3: If you're there to be liked, you're in the wrong job.
Speaker 3: Get out right away.
Speaker 4: If you're there to be liked, get out right away.
Speaker 4: Well that makes sense coming from a guy who quit
Speaker 4: after ten months. I guess you were there to be
Speaker 4: liked and you weren't very liked anymore, so you got out.
Speaker 4: Minor victory lap for myself. Yes I did call it.
Speaker 4: Yes I did say the DOJ was going to release
Speaker 4: files just before bong Gino went back on the air
Speaker 4: to try and soften the blow of his failures. Shockingly,
Speaker 4: he is not taking credit for the files being released,
Speaker 4: instead attributing it to the Trump administration and his team
Speaker 4: releasing these files, despite the fact that they only did
Speaker 4: so because of a Act of Congress thanks to Massi
Speaker 4: and Kanna and a handful of others. So, yeah, a
Speaker 4: good job. Trying to cover your tracks not exactly working
Speaker 4: really well. There is so much in these files. I'm
Speaker 4: doing my best to distill it, which is why I've
Speaker 4: taken three days of just processing before I actually came
Speaker 4: to you with any sort of coverage of what I'm
Speaker 4: reading here and what I think is valid. So I
Speaker 4: just wanted to start by prefacing. Obviously, this is all alleged.
Speaker 4: If we had a functioning DOJ, if we had a
Speaker 4: functioning FBI, if we had a functioning executive or judiciary
Speaker 4: or any if we had a functioning government at all,
Speaker 4: it wouldn't be left to podcasters to try and distill
Speaker 4: this down to give you something comprehensible. But that's where
Speaker 4: we're at. We don't have a functioning government, So now
Speaker 4: they're going to instead point at us and go, oh, look,
Speaker 4: they're putting all these unfounded allegations out there. They're only
Speaker 4: unfounded because you didn't follow up. They're only unfounded because
Speaker 4: you didn't actually investigate and prosecute any of these people.
Speaker 4: They did not follow up on ninety nine percent of this,
Speaker 4: So that's not our fault, that's theirs.
Speaker 5: You said, this is the end of the Epstein, of
Speaker 5: your review of the Epstein files. So just to clarify,
Speaker 5: or is the public going to learn the identities of
Speaker 5: the men who abuse the girls with the information that
Speaker 5: you're releasing and if not, why not? And then I
Speaker 5: have a quick follow up.
Speaker 6: I mean, you just baked in an assumption into your
Speaker 6: question that I never said, and I don't know to
Speaker 6: be true. Is the public going to learn about men
Speaker 6: that abuse these girls?
Speaker 7: Like?
Speaker 6: What does that mean?
Speaker 4: I understand what that means.
Speaker 5: Well, I mean they're the men who abuse the young
Speaker 5: women through Epstein's through.
Speaker 6: We said in July, and it remains as true today
Speaker 6: as it was in July. If we had information we
Speaker 6: meeting the Department of Justice about men who abused women,
Speaker 6: we would we would we would prosecute them.
Speaker 8: Right.
Speaker 6: We talked about the work that we're doing. That's why
Speaker 6: I said that there's I said this earlier. There's this
Speaker 6: built in assumption that somehow there's this hidden tranche of
Speaker 6: information of men that we know about that we're covering up,
Speaker 6: or that we're not we're choosing not to prosecute. That
Speaker 6: is not the case. I don't know whether there are
Speaker 6: men out there that abuse these women.
Speaker 4: I think I speak for all of America when I
Speaker 4: say this, but that's.
Speaker 9: Simply not possible.
Speaker 7: Why isn't it possible?
Speaker 3: It's just not.
Speaker 10: Why not?
Speaker 4: Your stupid fast Yeah, why isn't it possible for you
Speaker 4: to prosecute in these people? And the feigned incredulity with
Speaker 4: which he responds to that reporter's very valid question, why
Speaker 4: are you not prosecuting any of the men who were
Speaker 4: collaborators or customers of Jeffrey Epstein. It's not as if
Speaker 4: there aren't dozens actually over one hundred women who have
Speaker 4: come forward. But sure there's dozens that are still willing
Speaker 4: to talk. Many of them stand outside of Congress every
Speaker 4: couple months they go out there. Thomas Massey has said
Speaker 4: he has their names. We're going on nearly twenty years
Speaker 4: since his first conviction, and we're going to pretend as
Speaker 4: if there aren't additional victims or additional perpetrators that you
Speaker 4: could be prosecuting. We're still going to pretend that. And
Speaker 4: I think that this is a really interesting time to
Speaker 4: be living through. First off, there's this dichotomous worldview that
Speaker 4: we're all living through in that those that are on
Speaker 4: the Internet, those that are on x for instance, or
Speaker 4: maybe even in insta, they're very aware of what's happening
Speaker 4: with this case, with these files being released. If you're
Speaker 4: talking to your grandparents right now, no disrespect to any
Speaker 4: of the grandparents out there that are watching this right now,
Speaker 4: I'm not talking about you. I'm talking about those that
Speaker 4: are tuning into Barry Weiss's brand new CBS News. There's
Speaker 4: not much coverage happening of this, and if there is
Speaker 4: any coverage happening, it's always diminishing in nature. It's very
Speaker 4: similar or reminiscent to the COVID era in that like
Speaker 4: you're either on the Internet and you know the truth
Speaker 4: years before everybody else, or you're watching Fox News and
Speaker 4: you have no fucking clue what's going on. And I
Speaker 4: think that's what we're dealing with here, is that once
Speaker 4: again there's just about half the population is totally red pilled,
Speaker 4: totally awake, totally furious about all of this, and then
Speaker 4: the other half or less just like, well, this is
Speaker 4: probably not that big of a deal. It's like, no,
Speaker 4: it's actually a huge deal. And I'm going to rattle
Speaker 4: off some of the more pertinent I provable emails in
Speaker 4: just a second, but before I do that, I want
Speaker 4: to remind you that Thomas Massey last month came forward
Speaker 4: saying that someone in his office was being threatened by
Speaker 4: the FBI because of his dogged work and getting these
Speaker 4: files released.
Speaker 11: One of cash Battel's staff threatened my staff with a
Speaker 11: criminal investigation if we didn't straighten up and play ball.
Speaker 4: I was going to ask you about that. But since
Speaker 4: you brought it up, and I'm bringing it up, okay,
Speaker 4: you brought.
Speaker 11: It up criminal investigation having nothing to do.
Speaker 4: He said it was going to be a fraud. We're
Speaker 4: going to investigate one of your staff for fraud.
Speaker 11: And he told another one of my staff this, if
Speaker 11: you guys don't straighten up, you know, if you want
Speaker 11: to play hardball, if this is how you want to
Speaker 11: play it, or something like that, this member of your
Speaker 11: staff is going to get criminally investigated for fraud.
Speaker 4: A very specific threat. So we've got Thomas Massey, one
Speaker 4: of the only reputable congressional people that we have still
Speaker 4: representing us, being threatened by the head of the FBI. Now,
Speaker 4: let's have a little refresher course on who the head
Speaker 4: of the FBI is. This is cash Battel, more than
Speaker 4: six months ago, in September of twenty twenty five, testifying
Speaker 4: in front of Congress and perjuring himself into oblivion.
Speaker 2: Is no credible information none. If there were, I would
Speaker 2: bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals.
Speaker 2: And the information we have, again is limited.
Speaker 4: So the answer is no.
Speaker 2: One for the information that we have and the files
Speaker 2: in the case file.
Speaker 4: Okay, now, it's very important to remember that just because
Speaker 4: we got these files still even though Congress said that
Speaker 4: they're not to be redacted, in fact a huge percentage
Speaker 4: of them still are heavily redacted. But more important, and
Speaker 4: this is the key thing to remember, we are not
Speaker 4: seeing the video files that were alleged to have been
Speaker 4: kept by Epstein for blackmail purposes. Those files were alleged
Speaker 4: to have been possessed by the FBI, I believe in
Speaker 4: New York. There was also reports that his entire properties
Speaker 4: in New York and on the Island and elsewhere were
Speaker 4: fully surveilled, and that he had safes containing footage of
Speaker 4: the wealthy and powerful people that were caught up in
Speaker 4: this stuff. None of that has been released. None of
Speaker 4: it has been either verified or dismissed as being nonsense either.
Speaker 4: So we're really still working with a stacked deck. We
Speaker 4: don't actually know the full nature of this operation, but
Speaker 4: I will say, based off of the emails that we
Speaker 4: have gotten to see, I think it's fair to say
Speaker 4: that Cashptel obviously perjured himself and all of these people
Speaker 4: are lying through their fucking teeth about the nature of
Speaker 4: this operation, which is what Epstein was, it was a
Speaker 4: vast operation. So I'm just going to rattle off a
Speaker 4: bunch of the more pertinent email details so that you
Speaker 4: guys can really kind of distill it down to some
Speaker 4: whatever narrative you think fits here. I'll give you my
Speaker 4: take in a second. On April fifth of twenty seventeen,
Speaker 4: Michael Woolf, who's an author and journalist, emails Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 4: This is right after Steve Bannon was fired. He was
Speaker 4: released by the Security Council under Trump in twenty seventeen,
Speaker 4: and Michael Wolfe emailed Jeffrey Epstein saying war between the
Speaker 4: Jay's and non Jays Jays presently winning. So yeah, pretty
Speaker 4: obvious that there is in fact a power battle within
Speaker 4: the executive branch trying to dictate our foreign policy. No
Speaker 4: surprises there. Now, there were a lot of anonymous tips
Speaker 4: and allegations that were unverified that came as a flood
Speaker 4: after twenty twenty. That was after this was already a
Speaker 4: well known story. So I'm taking all of those with
Speaker 4: a grain of salt. I think that the more valid
Speaker 4: claims are those that came before this was a public phenomenon.
Speaker 4: Once it's a widespread national story or global story. Obviously,
Speaker 4: you're going to have a lot of lunatics that are
Speaker 4: just calling up and saying the craziest things. However, this
Speaker 4: one is from October of twenty twenty, to be exact,
Speaker 4: and it's a FBI CHS reporting document, so that means
Speaker 4: that it's a confidential human source, in which he says
Speaker 4: that the confidential human source believed Dershowitz, which is Alan Derschowitz,
Speaker 4: was co opted by Mosad and subscribed to their mission.
Speaker 4: It goes on to say CHS advised that this was
Speaker 4: a real collusion story. Trump has been compromised Israel and
Speaker 4: Kushner is their brains behind this organization and his presidency,
Speaker 4: alleging that Jared Kushner, Trump's son in law, Ivanka's husband,
Speaker 4: was in fact the brains behind the operation and that
Speaker 4: this was evidence of him being compromised. We have an
Speaker 4: email in twenty fifteen verified from Kathy Rumler, who was
Speaker 4: Obama's White House counsel so basically the top lawyer to
Speaker 4: President Obama, in which she emails Jeffrey Epstein just hours
Speaker 4: after being notified by John Brennan that the head of
Speaker 4: the CIA was going to issue her the CIA Agency Medal,
Speaker 4: which is the highest award this morning. How cool is that?
Speaker 4: She responds, So this is the top attorney to the
Speaker 4: president of United States, President Obama emailing Jeffrey Epstein notifying
Speaker 4: him that she is receiving award from the head of
Speaker 4: the CIA. Seems like this guy's pretty well connected. Doune. Oh,
Speaker 4: it gets way deeper than that, folks. Jeffrey Epstein on
Speaker 4: October twenty six, twenty seventeen, emails Michael Wolfe that author
Speaker 4: I told you about earlier, says, I assume you already
Speaker 4: know that the original funder for the dossier was Rubio.
Speaker 4: Not sure why it seems so mysterious. This is in
Speaker 4: reference to the Steel dossier. This is an allegation from
Speaker 4: Jeffrey Epstein saying that Marco Rubio, now the Secretary of
Speaker 4: State under Donald Trump, was in fact the original funding
Speaker 4: source for the Steele dossier, which painted the Russian collusion narrative,
Speaker 4: or at least was the original foundational lies to start
Speaker 4: that entire scam. Fascinating if true. I have no idea
Speaker 4: if that's accurate. I always thought that it was Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 4: but it certainly could be Rubio. The rabbit hole goes
Speaker 4: tremendously deeper with this one. On March eighteenth of twenty fourteen.
Speaker 4: This is from armand De Rothschild of the Rothschild Banking family,
Speaker 4: emailing Jeffrey Epstein. Hi, Jeff, very long day sitting on
Speaker 4: bank board numbers are okay, but not a satisfactory to me,
Speaker 4: and I'm putting them under pressure to be more innovative
Speaker 4: about asset management funds while restructuring. I'm in a dinner
Speaker 4: with a client, fed up. I miss our talks and
Speaker 4: hope you are well. We'll be at home tomorrow night.
Speaker 4: Will you be free? Let's discuss Ukraine, to which Jeffrey
Speaker 4: Epstein responds, Ukraine upheaval should provide many opportunities many So
Speaker 4: this is just after the maidn KU the US State
Speaker 4: Department back coup an email between Jeffrey Epstein and one
Speaker 4: of the ross Childs talking about opportunities in Ukraine after
Speaker 4: the CIA back kup. Oh my goodness. Yeah. Verified. And
Speaker 4: if you think that this is just a one off
Speaker 4: nothing burger, here's what Jeffrey Epstein had to say to
Speaker 4: Peter Teal about his relationship with the Roschilds. As you
Speaker 4: probably know, I represent the Ross childs I was hoping
Speaker 4: to figure out a way for the bank that has
Speaker 4: one hundred and sixty billion blah blah blah. It doesn't
Speaker 4: say anything pertinent after that, but he then tells him
Speaker 4: come to the island or if you would like to
Speaker 4: meet in Saudi at the end of the month. So yeahhhh,
Speaker 4: my god. All right, So you've got Jeffrey Epstein emailing
Speaker 4: Peter Thiel, who was one of the founders of Palentier,
Speaker 4: and he's saying that I represent the Rothstrauts, the legendary
Speaker 4: banking family. Okay, and that's probably a one off nothing burger, right, Well,
Speaker 4: not so much. This is a phone call between Ahoud Barock,
Speaker 4: former top Intel guy basically head of their their version
Speaker 4: of the Pentagon, and also former Prime Minister of Israel,
Speaker 4: having a conversation with Jeffrey Epstein recorded. I wonder why
Speaker 4: it was recorded. I bet you could figure it out.
Speaker 8: I've never met Peter til and everybody says he sort
Speaker 8: of jumps around and actually like a drugs.
Speaker 4: Smoking Yeah, he looks.
Speaker 8: However, he is a company called Pallenteer.
Speaker 10: P A L L E N.
Speaker 8: T E t I E R. Palenteers. Peter Teal's company,
Speaker 8: so he thought that Peter would put you on the
Speaker 8: board of Palenteer. Peter tile is one of the best.
Speaker 8: I've never met him. He's going to come here next week,
Speaker 8: so I wanted to talk to him, and I talk
Speaker 8: to you again. They pai lari billion dollars a year
Speaker 8: just to advise it.
Speaker 4: Now, mind you, this is twenty fourteen or so, So
Speaker 4: this is as Barack is getting out of power, and
Speaker 4: this is before Epstein is on a buddy buddy basis
Speaker 4: with Peter Teal, the founder of Palenteer, in which he's
Speaker 4: misspelling the name of Palenteer the company, but he is
Speaker 4: still pushing this basically Intel creation to Barack, and it
Speaker 4: gets much more interesting from there. Now, this isn't a
Speaker 4: one off phone call between Ahud Barack and Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 4: proceeded to meet in person with Jeffrey Epstein. It documented
Speaker 4: thirty six times over a couple year period after he
Speaker 4: leaves the Prime ministership. But I thought the most fascinating
Speaker 4: aspect of that call is that he what he details
Speaker 4: out is essentially how to parlay political power into financial wealth,
Speaker 4: wants leaving office. So Brock, who's been both in the military,
Speaker 4: and then the highest levels of intel, and then all
Speaker 4: the way up to the top level of the Prime
Speaker 4: ministership of Israel. He is essentially advising him to put
Speaker 4: together a list of all of the people who owe
Speaker 4: you something that you've benefited well, you've been in power,
Speaker 4: and you're going to reach out to them before you
Speaker 4: leave office to basically set up a your own golden parachute,
Speaker 4: is essentially what he's advising him on. He goes so
Speaker 4: far as to say, people that owe you their lives,
Speaker 4: reach out to them. Stop thinking about, you know, your
Speaker 4: skill set, stop thinking about how you can actually add
Speaker 4: market value. You are putting together a list of people
Speaker 4: who owe you favors, and you're going to reach out
Speaker 4: to them, and you're going to ask them for huge
Speaker 4: paydays to be on their boards. And that the first
Speaker 4: name he pushes is Palenteer, and he goes on to
Speaker 4: say that essentially you can get paid two to three
Speaker 4: million dollars a year to be on the boards of
Speaker 4: a handful of these companies, and essentially you can go
Speaker 4: from being broke to making ten to twenty million dollars
Speaker 4: annually just by having your name attached to the board
Speaker 4: of XYZ Corporation. I've got a lot more to say
Speaker 4: about that, but I'm going to keep moving through these
Speaker 4: emails just so we can cover everything that I thought
Speaker 4: was super interesting. There's an email from July twenty fourth,
Speaker 4: twenty nineteen, which is talking about how one of the
Speaker 4: cellmates to Jeffrey Epstein had a pending incident report for
Speaker 4: self mutilation and therefore he will turn to special housing
Speaker 4: unit and will be selled with inmate blank blacked out.
Speaker 4: Inmate blacked out pleaded guilty in March to mailing improvised
Speaker 4: explosive devices to thirteen people, including many prominent Democratic figures,
Speaker 4: amongst them former President Barack Obama, former VP Joe Biden,
Speaker 4: former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and Senais Corey Booker
Speaker 4: and Kamala Harris, as well as CNN. He drove around
Speaker 4: at a van festooned with political stickers and rants, one of
Speaker 4: them targeting CNN. Anyways, long story short, the reason I'm
Speaker 4: saying that this is fascinating is because this guy has
Speaker 4: a track record of being very violent towards Democrats, and
Speaker 4: Jeffrey Epstein, who was a top advisor to many of
Speaker 4: these people, was apparently to be his cellmate. So that's
Speaker 4: interesting given that he, you know, perished, and if you
Speaker 4: think it's at all odd that a convicted kid diddler
Speaker 4: would be a top advisor to the active and then
Speaker 4: former Prime Minister of Israel, I should also add that.
Speaker 4: In twenty eighteen December seventeenth, Jeffrey Epstein emailed at Ubrock
Speaker 4: saying you should make clear that I don't work for
Speaker 4: Massad Smiley Face, to which a Hoodbrock responds you or I,
Speaker 4: and then Epstein responds that I don't Smiley Face. So yeah,
Speaker 4: I don't know that he necessarily worked for them, but
Speaker 4: to say he wasn't connected given Barack's relationship, I think
Speaker 4: would be a stretch. Adding on to the weirdness of
Speaker 4: the cell mat that Epstein had, you also have an
Speaker 4: email from Jeffrey Epstein to himself just ten days before
Speaker 4: he allegedly takes his own life, in which he details
Speaker 4: off a bunch of names Mandelsson, Barnaby, Summers, Watson, Axel Botstein,
Speaker 4: Kareem Turjay, Pritzker, Edelman, set Lloyd, Martinovvakminsky, Tata, Suskin Stroman
Speaker 4: jer Krauss. He's just rattling off a ton of names,
Speaker 4: which I think is very reminiscent of the phone call
Speaker 4: that he has with Barack, where essentially he is putting
Speaker 4: together a list of all the people that owe him
Speaker 4: a favor, as in, like, this is who you should
Speaker 4: be talking to to see if I can get assistance
Speaker 4: in getting out of here. Now, that's my read of it.
Speaker 4: I can't say exactly why he's doing this, but it
Speaker 4: does seem as if he's preparing himself a list of
Speaker 4: names from which he's going to have a conversation with
Speaker 4: Steve Bannon. Steve Bannon, I might add, was assisting Jeffrey
Speaker 4: Epstein and trying to rehabilitate his image, which is odd
Speaker 4: because ten days later he then takes his own life. Okay,
Speaker 4: I guess that's something that people do. I'm going to
Speaker 4: fire off a bunch of things that you really fast.
Speaker 4: We've got an anonymous email to Jeffrey Epstein saying I
Speaker 4: give you permission to kill him. He is apparently with blank.
Speaker 4: He lied to you and he lied to me. That's
Speaker 4: all we got. That was June thirtieth of twenty fourteen.
Speaker 4: Make of it what you will. We've also got hard
Speaker 4: proof that Howard Lutnik Jeffrey Epstein's former neighbor, I might add,
Speaker 4: is busted. He lied through his teeth about his relationship
Speaker 4: with Epstein.
Speaker 10: He opens the doors and there's a massage table in
Speaker 10: the middle of the room and candles all around and stuff.
Speaker 10: So I ask very insightful cutting questions. I say to him,
Speaker 10: massage table in the middle of your house? How often
Speaker 10: you have a massage? And he says every day? And
Speaker 10: then he like gets like weirdly close to me and
Speaker 10: he says, and the right kind of massage. Now my
Speaker 10: wife is standing here, so she looks at me, and
Speaker 10: I look at her, and we say, I'm sorry, we
Speaker 10: have to go, and we left. And in the six
Speaker 10: or eight steps it takes to get from his house
Speaker 10: to my house, my wife and I decided that I
Speaker 10: will never be in the room with that disgusting person
Speaker 10: ever again.
Speaker 4: Are we witnessing the greatest run in precious metals history? Well,
Speaker 4: if you looked at the draw down lately, maybe not.
Speaker 4: Or it could be a pullback. There are major pullbacks
Speaker 4: and significant bowl markets that happens all the time. Only
Speaker 4: time will tell. But gold and silver are defying the
Speaker 4: odds right now. People ask me, Clint is it too
Speaker 4: late to get in? Have I missed the train? Look,
Speaker 4: no one has a crystal ball. There's always pullbacks. This
Speaker 4: is normal, But the reason for the price explosion doesn't
Speaker 4: appear to be going away because the printing prices continue
Speaker 4: to turn. So if you want to learn more about
Speaker 4: how precious metals could help you, my partners over at
Speaker 4: gold Co have put together the perfect resource. It's their
Speaker 4: free twenty twenty six gold and silver kit. I trust
Speaker 4: these guys. They support the show and they've done an
Speaker 4: excellent job educating people like myself on metals. So head
Speaker 4: over to Clint likes gold dot com to learn more
Speaker 4: and get this big news. Launching this month, gold Co
Speaker 4: is celebrating America's two hundred and fiftieth anniversary with a
Speaker 4: limited time bonus offer. Get up to ten percent free
Speaker 4: gold or silver, plus free storage and a free home
Speaker 4: safe with a minimum cash purchase a free home safe.
Speaker 4: Love it. Go to Clint likes gold dot com for details. Now,
Speaker 4: that's Howard Lutnik, our current commerce secretary, lying through his teeth.
Speaker 4: Let's parse out this email. So basically, he's alleging that
Speaker 4: he did not have any relationship or was never in
Speaker 4: the room with Jeffrey Ebstein post I think two thousand
Speaker 4: and four ish. Well, we've got an email from Howard
Speaker 4: Lutnik on December nineteenth, twenty twelve, says, Hi, Jeff, we
Speaker 4: were lending in Saint Thomas early Saturday afternoon and planning
Speaker 4: to head over to Saint Barts, Aguila on Monday at
Speaker 4: some point. Where are you located? What is exact location
Speaker 4: from my captain to Sunday evening for dinner? Sound good?
Speaker 4: I have another couple, Michael and Marcy Laherman with me
Speaker 4: on my boat and this is the key. Each of
Speaker 4: us has four children, two sixteen's, two fourteen's, a thirteen
Speaker 4: to twelve and eleven, and a seven year old. Thanks
Speaker 4: Howard Epstein. Response comes Saturday or Sunday lunch, Little Saint
Speaker 4: James on the map behind Christmas Cove. So yeah, I
Speaker 4: uh look, make up at what you will. If you were,
Speaker 4: in fact so deeply disturbed after this meeting with Epstein
Speaker 4: back in the early two thousands that you told your
Speaker 4: wife you would never be around him again, do you
Speaker 4: really email him a decade later and say I'm not
Speaker 4: only am I going to come and see you, I'm
Speaker 4: going to your private island. That would be weird enough, right,
Speaker 4: But then you're gonna list off, You're gonna rattle off
Speaker 4: all of the ages of your children, given that you've
Speaker 4: said that you were creeped out by this guy. But
Speaker 4: you're what preparing some sort of like Disney based family
Speaker 4: vacation where all of the ages of the kids involved
Speaker 4: need to be listed out? Or is it some more
Speaker 4: sinister code action. I don't know, and I'm not going
Speaker 4: to pretend to know, but I found that to be
Speaker 4: very strange, especially given that we know he lied through
Speaker 4: his teeth that he maintained a relationship with Epstein for
Speaker 4: over a decade after he said it had stopped. Very
Speaker 4: similar to what Donald Trump is doing right now, lying
Speaker 4: about his relationship with Epstein when they were good friends
Speaker 4: in the nineties and the two thousands, and they only
Speaker 4: had a falling out in two thousand and seven because
Speaker 4: Jeffrey Epstein kept stealing massuses from mar A Lago. That's
Speaker 4: the true story, whether Trump wants to tell it or not.
Speaker 4: And one other key item to note about Howard Lutnik
Speaker 4: he described Jeffrey Epstein and I quote as the greatest
Speaker 4: blackmailer ever. Why would Howard Lutnik be going to the
Speaker 4: private island of a guy who he believes as a blackmailer,
Speaker 4: or did he only find out that he was a
Speaker 4: blackmailer after going to the island, In which case, why
Speaker 4: did he not come forward? Inquiring minds would like to
Speaker 4: know Howard please fill us in. We've also got in
Speaker 4: case you're wondering whether or not these girls that he
Speaker 4: was pretty clearly procuring for his client base, the wealthy
Speaker 4: and powerful, which he had been entrapped. There's an email
Speaker 4: on February nineteen, twenty twelve. We don't know who from,
Speaker 4: but she says to Jeffrey Ian, sweet guy. We talked
Speaker 4: a lot. He likes kissing. I think he liked the
Speaker 4: blowjob he blanked in my mouth. Don't think he is gay.
Speaker 4: Won't be shitty with you next time. Don't know about Jacob.
Speaker 4: Maybe I see Ian tonight again after his meeting. And
Speaker 4: this is from Epstein's email, where he says, did you
Speaker 4: do Ian Jacob? Details please now? Unless he's in some
Speaker 4: sort of cockery relationship, which I guess is possible, it
Speaker 4: seems to me that in fact, he is asking for
Speaker 4: details as to what sexual favors his gal provided to
Speaker 4: some of his marks. The depravity doesn't stop there. We
Speaker 4: also have an email from Jeffrey Epstein to himself in
Speaker 4: which it looks as if he is essentially drafting a
Speaker 4: threatening letter or email to Bill Gates for blackmail purposes
Speaker 4: on behalf of a former employee of one Bill Gates,
Speaker 4: in which he types on July eighteenth, twenty thirteen, I've
Speaker 4: decided to resign my position, effective immediately with BG three
Speaker 4: and the Melinda Gates Foundation. During the paser a few weeks,
Speaker 4: I have been caught up in a severe marital dispute
Speaker 4: between Melinda and Bill. In my role as his right
Speaker 4: hand I have been asked and wrongly acquiesced into participating
Speaker 4: in things that have ranged from the morally inappropriate to
Speaker 4: the ethically unsounded. Have been repeatedly asked to do things
Speaker 4: that get near and potentially over the line into the illegal.
Speaker 4: I feel it would be dishonest to myself in my future.
Speaker 4: From helping Bill to get drugs in order to deal
Speaker 4: with consequences of sex with Russian girls, to facilitating his
Speaker 4: illicit triss with married women, to being asked to provide
Speaker 4: adderall for bridge tournaments as I am a medical doctor,
Speaker 4: but have no prescription writing ability. Blah blah blah. You
Speaker 4: get the idea.
Speaker 7: I was introduced to ev scene by the lady Lynn Rothschild,
Speaker 7: you know, a prominent British lady, and she told me
Speaker 7: he was a wonderful guy. I didn't want to meet him,
Speaker 7: but she said, no, you have to meet him. He's
Speaker 7: he's very wealthy, and he's connected to Harvard and he
Speaker 7: does a lot of things to Harvard.
Speaker 4: And she knew him intimately. She knew him very well.
Speaker 7: She's the one who introduced him to Bill Clinton as
Speaker 7: far as I know. As far as I know, she
Speaker 7: introduced him to Prince Andrew. She is at the center
Speaker 7: of this entire enterprise, and so far her name hasn't
Speaker 7: even come up. I was on his plane with him,
Speaker 7: ohn with Senator gat Glenn, going to visit Shimune Perez
Speaker 7: in the home of Leslie Wesner for his birthday. But
Speaker 7: I think that Lynn Rothschild has to be questioned at
Speaker 7: the center of this because she's the one who made
Speaker 7: all the introductions.
Speaker 4: So we've got Alan Dershwitz saying that he was introduced
Speaker 4: to Jeffrey Epstein by a Rothschild, and then also at
Speaker 4: Dershowitz went on to defend Epstein. So despite the fact
Speaker 4: that he's saying, you know, I didn't really have a
Speaker 4: relationship with this guy, there's nothing nefarious here. He did
Speaker 4: defend Epstein in that case that got him that sweetheart
Speaker 4: deal from alex Acosta in two thousand and seven. So yeah,
Speaker 4: this rabbit hole goes deep. Just a bit more evidence
Speaker 4: on the blackmail angle. We've got an email. This is
Speaker 4: from Segar and Jetty. Epstein emailed a Russian associate in
Speaker 4: twenty fifteen asking for help because a girl he was
Speaker 4: connected to wanted to quote blackmail a group of powerful
Speaker 4: businessmen in New York. He lists her address of where
Speaker 4: she was staying at the time. So I'll just be
Speaker 4: straight with you, guys, like I think this guy was
Speaker 4: a fixer. But I'm gonna give you my summary in
Speaker 4: a second. Let's finish these up. There's a whole litany
Speaker 4: of unverified claims that I have not spent my time
Speaker 4: on and wasted your time on, because we just don't know.
Speaker 4: There's very salacious accusations that go to George Bush Senior.
Speaker 4: I mean there's murder and torture and trafficking and everything
Speaker 4: you could imagine, but there's really no way for me
Speaker 4: to verify it.
Speaker 12: Which brings us back to this new Epstein release, because
Speaker 12: in it, the word pizza is mentioned nine hundred eleven times.
Speaker 12: That's right, nine hundred eleven times. Adults are emailing back
Speaker 12: and forth about slices of pizza and about pizza parties,
Speaker 12: and the word pizza is often paired with great soda
Speaker 12: in bizarre context within emails addressed to Epstein by individuals
Speaker 12: whose names have been mostly redacted. So here's one, Well,
Speaker 12: this is better than a Chinese cookie. Let's go for
Speaker 12: pizza and grape soda. Again, no one else can understand.
Speaker 4: So I'm not going to spend any more time trying
Speaker 4: to get the bottom of those angles because I think
Speaker 4: the emails that are verified being from Jeffrey Epstein to
Speaker 4: very high power, high powered people talking about some fairly
Speaker 4: nefarious things, that's enough for us to go off of.
Speaker 4: So I don't want us to spiral into the black
Speaker 4: hole of what could be, because I think there's enough
Speaker 4: here to know that there's something very seriously wrong with
Speaker 4: the operation this guy was running. And to be straight
Speaker 4: with you, I'm not sure the full nature of the
Speaker 4: operation that Epstein was running. But I think it's fair
Speaker 4: to say that it was multifaceted. That if you watch
Speaker 4: any of his interviews, and I've watched like thirty minutes
Speaker 4: of him talking, he's not a very bright guy.
Speaker 13: Fundamental part of money, which is called fractionalized banking scutionalized banking,
Speaker 13: is something that finance people understand, and the people on
Speaker 13: the street, and when I say people on the street
Speaker 13: that's where I was when I started on Will Street,
Speaker 13: would find it impossible to believe.
Speaker 4: And I say this as someone who comes from the
Speaker 4: finance world who understands high finance. I've literally never seen him.
Speaker 4: I've never read him in an email or heard him
Speaker 4: in a talking conversation where he comes across any more
Speaker 4: educated about finance than I am. Like most of the time,
Speaker 4: he comes off sounding like a guy who wants to
Speaker 4: sound like he's the guy. Does that make sense? It's
Speaker 4: hard to explain this. I think the best way to
Speaker 4: analogize it would be like whatever industry each of you
Speaker 4: are in individually, you know how there's nuances of that
Speaker 4: industry that if you know it, that once you're in
Speaker 4: that industry, it's just kind of a given. But if
Speaker 4: you're outside of that industry, you probably wouldn't know that
Speaker 4: you're being bullshitted. That's how he comes across, Like when
Speaker 4: he's talking about fractionalized banking as if it's some profundity,
Speaker 4: you know, it's like, no, that's just how it works,
Speaker 4: you know. But he's telling these stories to people that like, Honestly,
Speaker 4: what it highlights to me, the fact that a guy
Speaker 4: like this who's not very bright can bullshit his way
Speaker 4: to the highest levels of influence just tells me that
Speaker 4: our elite are not very bright, not very impressive people.
Speaker 4: That this guy can actually con some of the people
Speaker 4: at the highest levels of whatever respective government branch or
Speaker 4: industry that their participants in, and he's just grifting his
Speaker 4: way through life into the highest level. Now, granted, he's
Speaker 4: also doing it I think via blackmail. He's doing it
Speaker 4: via parties and drugs and trafficking and surveillance and all
Speaker 4: sorts of mechanisms for control. But I'm saying, to get
Speaker 4: into those doors, to go to the cocktail parties and
Speaker 4: to have conversations with the high powered elites, and to
Speaker 4: just buffalo your way through life and to very rarely
Speaker 4: did anybody beat an eye at his lofty claims that
Speaker 4: he's this top financial manager, top accountant, top this, top that, top,
Speaker 4: he's big time in the biomedical research, and I mean
Speaker 4: his laundry list of alleged accolades that he really didn't deserve.
Speaker 4: It didn't actually hold. Most people never caught on. Most
Speaker 4: of these people were just like, well, you know, he's
Speaker 4: friends with Bill Clinton, and he used to chum it
Speaker 4: up with Donald Trump, and he knows X and B,
Speaker 4: and he knows this prince and this king, and he
Speaker 4: knows this congressman. And it's like okay, so they all
Speaker 4: these people just turn to blind eye. And I just
Speaker 4: think it's a really fascinating kind of sociological study that
Speaker 4: there's just something about social proof. And I'm sure you
Speaker 4: guys have heard of that if you've ever looked into, like, uh,
Speaker 4: the game like how to Date, One of the tricks
Speaker 4: from one of these you know, apex cosmen, these dating gurus,
Speaker 4: was that you want to always make yourself appear to
Speaker 4: be in the inn group, and you need to get
Speaker 4: social proof. So if you go to a club by yourself,
Speaker 4: obviously you're the odd man out, it's going to be
Speaker 4: very hard to demonstrate your self worth. So it's very
Speaker 4: important that, like if you have a wing girl, a wingwoman,
Speaker 4: like that's huge because she already is signaling that you're
Speaker 4: a guy that they might want to be around, you're
Speaker 4: a safe guy to be around, You're this, you're that,
Speaker 4: and then they can also you know, puff up your resume.
Speaker 4: That's basically what Epstein was doing throughout his life. He's
Speaker 4: just like, I'm friends. He was just constantly parlaying his relationship,
Speaker 4: his friendships with wealthy and powerful people to open up
Speaker 4: doors to become friends with more and more wealthy and
Speaker 4: powerful people. And he just leavered that up. He just
Speaker 4: kept going to the point that he got to the
Speaker 4: highest levels of the British Royalty, to the highest levels
Speaker 4: of Israeli to American I mean, it's really remarkable when
Speaker 4: you look at it. But we've already recapped much of
Speaker 4: this on prior episode, so I'm not going to do
Speaker 4: it again. But dropsite News has laid bare his real
Speaker 4: foundational claims as to why I and so many other
Speaker 4: people believe that he was an intelligence asset, and specifically Masad,
Speaker 4: specifically CIA and likely I six as well. He was
Speaker 4: doing things that just a normal civilian would not one
Speaker 4: be capable of doing, but two and most importantly, not
Speaker 4: be capable of doing and getting away with it for decades.
Speaker 4: And I think that's really the tell here. And because
Speaker 4: we're unlikely to ever get a genuine investigation by Pam
Speaker 4: Bondi or Cash Pateel or really anybody, we're going to
Speaker 4: have to jump to some conclusion or rather at least
Speaker 4: make some assumptions about the nature of his business, the
Speaker 4: nature of what he was. This is my opinion after
Speaker 4: reading for days now and really years I've been studying this,
Speaker 4: but for the past few days, since these files dropped
Speaker 4: on Friday, I've just been digging NonStop. And what I've
Speaker 4: come away with concluding or at least assuming, is that
Speaker 4: he was a fixer at the highest level. When they're
Speaker 4: gray area things that people in government do, they called
Speaker 4: Jeffrey Epstein. That was his job. He put people together
Speaker 4: at the highest levels of government of corporate America, and
Speaker 4: he got things done that you couldn't get done that
Speaker 4: were either gray area or black market outright, from negotiating
Speaker 4: weapons deals to assisting prime ministers and presidents and parleying
Speaker 4: their influence and their power into personal wealth. This guy
Speaker 4: really did it all. And I think at its core,
Speaker 4: even beyond the blackmail scheme, which I think did exist
Speaker 4: and I think was very pervasive and successful, I think
Speaker 4: the primary reason that the DOJ, why so many media apparatrics,
Speaker 4: why so many government agencies and government officials all turn
Speaker 4: a blind eye to this, is that this is really
Speaker 4: how the sausage is made. And I hate that metaphor,
Speaker 4: but it's apt here. This is how the sausage of
Speaker 4: governance is created. This is how they rule over us,
Speaker 4: this is how This is why so many of us
Speaker 4: feel as if a meritocratic civilization is no more, because
Speaker 4: it is no more, because this is the game at
Speaker 4: the highest levels. It's not about who's the most brilliant.
Speaker 4: It's not about who's the most creative. It's not about
Speaker 4: who's creating the most wealth or jobs or anything like that.
Speaker 4: It's about who knows who. It's about who do you
Speaker 4: know in government that can protect you. Well, we do
Speaker 4: shady and nefarious shit on the side with this corporate
Speaker 4: guru or this tycoon. That's the game. That's actually how
Speaker 4: the world runs.
Speaker 13: Now.
Speaker 4: Now I'm not naive, I'm not saying that wasn't an
Speaker 4: aspect of how the world has always been. We all
Speaker 4: know it is to a certain extent how it's been run.
Speaker 4: But there is this belief, or there was at least
Speaker 4: that in America in particular, that if you were just
Speaker 4: the best, well, then you could become wildly rich and
Speaker 4: famous and successful. And what we learn when you dig
Speaker 4: into these files is that, in truth, it's not so
Speaker 4: much about being the best at all. It's about what
Speaker 4: can you get away with? Who do you know to
Speaker 4: help me get away with it? And who do you
Speaker 4: know to help me cover my tracks once we've done it.
Speaker 4: That's what Jeffrey Epstein was. He was the fixer of
Speaker 4: fixers at the highest level. You need a metaphorical body buried,
Speaker 4: you call Jeff. You need to put together fifty billion
Speaker 4: dollars worth of funding for some biomedical research. You called Jeff.
Speaker 4: You need some startup in big tech. You have a
Speaker 4: defense contractor that you're trying to get involved with Israeli
Speaker 4: military or American or whoever else you called Jeff. This
Speaker 4: is what this guy did. And as salacious as all
Speaker 4: of the trafficking allegations are, and I think there's serious
Speaker 4: validity to much of those accusations, maybe not the most
Speaker 4: far fetched versions of it, where it's child sacrifice and
Speaker 4: all that, but rather just the blackmail angle of it
Speaker 4: I do think was real, but I think beyond that
Speaker 4: he was doing so much more. And I think that's
Speaker 4: why this can't come out. It's not even about the
Speaker 4: blackmail as much as it is. This is like an
Speaker 4: X ray machine being held up to the deep state.
Speaker 4: It actually shows you the internals of how our system
Speaker 4: works and why it's so broken, and why we should
Speaker 4: be so angry and why we should be demanding I mean,
Speaker 4: not even justice at this point, but a total reset.
Speaker 4: It's just it's just so egregious. It's so over the top.
Speaker 4: I understand fully the exasperation that people are dealing with
Speaker 4: after looking into this, and then you look at the
Speaker 4: media silence on it, and you go, wait, they don't
Speaker 4: care about Like this is the biggest story in the
Speaker 4: world and they're not talking about it. And then you
Speaker 4: start to look at the finance side behind those operations,
Speaker 4: and you look at how Barry Weiss became the head
Speaker 4: of CBS News and how the Ellisons took over that
Speaker 4: and TikTok and everything else, and you're like, oh, because
Speaker 4: that's all part of the same thing. That's how it
Speaker 4: actually works. That's how corporate America slashed the governments of
Speaker 4: the world work. It's all dirty, it's all filthy, it's
Speaker 4: all not meritocratic. It's cronyism at its core, and it's
Speaker 4: criminal at its roots. And no one's coming to save us.
Speaker 4: The DJ will not dig, they will not prosecute. They're
Speaker 4: telling it straight to your face.
Speaker 6: As you know, it is not a crime to party
Speaker 6: with myster Epstein, and so as horrible as it, it's
Speaker 6: not a crime to email with mister Epstein.
Speaker 4: We don't even know what you're talking about. Even though
Speaker 4: there's dozens of women who stood outside Congress a dozen
Speaker 4: times demanding justice, and they go, who are you talking about.
Speaker 4: We don't even see these women, We don't even know
Speaker 4: they exist. You've got people like Dan Bongino and Cash
Speaker 4: Hotel getting into the top two positions at the FBI
Speaker 4: explicitly saying that they are going to get to the
Speaker 4: bottom of this, telling us do not let this go.
Speaker 4: Quote Dan Bongino, this is really big, this is important,
Speaker 4: this is it. Yeah, he was telling you the truth then,
Speaker 4: and he's lying to you now, and there's a reason
Speaker 4: he's lying, because he's been told to. He has no choice,
Speaker 4: and I have zero doubt that his life is in
Speaker 4: jeopardy if he were to tell the truth about this stuff. Now,
Speaker 4: does that excuse him being a liar? No, it doesn't
Speaker 4: excuse it. I'm just explaining. I like I see it.
Speaker 4: I see it for what it is. I understand why
Speaker 4: he's made the choice that he's made. I just wish
Speaker 4: you would fade into oblivion because I don't want to
Speaker 4: hear a fucking word from you after I know you've lied.
Speaker 4: But instead we get nonsense like this.
Speaker 3: Buck stops here, The buck stops on that resolute desk.
Speaker 3: They are tough decisions, and that's what happened. I know
Speaker 3: a lot of you, and by the way, that are
Speaker 3: people in the chat. I just want you to know
Speaker 3: a little message to you. I just want you to
Speaker 3: know something.
Speaker 4: I own you.
Speaker 3: Guys. You can't stay away. I tweet you instantly respond
Speaker 3: I do a show. You can't stay away. Membership. No
Speaker 3: one's gonna be there. Really, it's one hundred and ninety
Speaker 3: four thousand. No One's biggest live stream in the world
Speaker 3: right now. No One's gonna be there. No one really,
Speaker 3: Then when people show up, that's just us there to
Speaker 3: repeat great, I own you guys.
Speaker 4: So why is the Trump administration covering all this up?
Speaker 4: Let's just let Nick Fuint does recap it for you.
Speaker 9: First you said they're on your desk, and now you
Speaker 9: say they don't exist. You campaign saying you're going to
Speaker 9: release the files, now you say there are no files
Speaker 9: to release. You talked about this sex traffic ring as
Speaker 9: a matter of fact, that's what Epstein was charged with
Speaker 9: and convicted for twenty years ago. Now you say there
Speaker 9: never was a sex trafficking ring. Two weeks before the war,
Speaker 9: Elon's got a black eye and says Trump won't release
Speaker 9: the files because he's in them. Now net Yahoo brings
Speaker 9: this giant trophy to the White House to commemorate their
Speaker 9: victory in the war, and right before he arrives, he
Speaker 9: gets this gift, which is the Epstein files are going
Speaker 9: to be buried. So people go, what's up? Then you
Speaker 9: get this extraordinary cover up. Trump comes out as guilty
Speaker 9: and defensive as anybody could possibly be. He says, if
Speaker 9: you are interested in the files, you're an idiot, you're
Speaker 9: a fake supporter. You're with the Democrats. You're with them.
Speaker 9: It's a hoax. The Democrats made it up. Why would
Speaker 9: they not get to the bottom of it? Under Biden?
Speaker 9: One line after another, one excuse after another, piling up.
Speaker 9: Congress shuts down a month early to prevent this from
Speaker 9: going through. Thomas Massey, Marjorie Green, Nancy Mayce working with
Speaker 9: the Democrats, are going to compel the release of the
Speaker 9: files with an Act of Congress. They're even going to
Speaker 9: bypass the Speaker of the House, the leader of their
Speaker 9: own party. Congress closes a month early for their MARIESE
Speaker 9: has to prevent this from happening. Then when Congress come back,
Speaker 9: comes back, do we get the files? No, because Congress
Speaker 9: shuts down for forty five days, longest government shut down
Speaker 9: in history, and in the end the Democrats give up
Speaker 9: without any concessions.
Speaker 4: Kind of weird.
Speaker 9: Then a week later we finally get this bill, it
Speaker 9: goes to the floor, it passes. Marjorie Green, who pushed it,
Speaker 9: resigns mysteriously after getting death threats.
Speaker 4: It takes two months. Now we're in January twenty six.
Speaker 9: We finally get the files and there are six million
Speaker 9: of them. Now we finally get the files after they
Speaker 9: pulled out every stop to prevent this from happening.
Speaker 4: And the reason I wanted to have Funta's recap it
Speaker 4: is because I think it's really important to remember all
Speaker 4: of the layers of cover up that we've personally witnessed
Speaker 4: over the past year. And really it's been for decades,
Speaker 4: but like it's been so obvious and egregious for the
Speaker 4: past year. And what does it tell you, I mean,
Speaker 4: what can you conclude from that? Well, the obvious conclusion
Speaker 4: is this, this is existential to the government. This is
Speaker 4: existential at the highest level. Across the board, They're all
Speaker 4: doing the same thing. They're all lying, they're all covering up,
Speaker 4: they're all covering up for each other. And when you
Speaker 4: look at the nature of Epstein's contacts, you start to
Speaker 4: realize why. You've got the top attorney to the White
Speaker 4: House under Obama who's emailing Jeffrey Epstein saying, oh I
Speaker 4: just got this top CIA award. You've got Bill Clinton
Speaker 4: flying on the lowly to express countless times. You've got
Speaker 4: Donald Trump having a decade plus year long relationship with Epstein.
Speaker 4: This was before he was prosecuted. So I'm not alleging
Speaker 4: anything crazy there. But regardless this, he's the next door
Speaker 4: neighbor of Howard Lutnick. You've got the active Commerce secretary
Speaker 4: under Donald Trump who's caught red handed lying that he
Speaker 4: had cut off ties with Epstein in the early two thousands,
Speaker 4: only to find out that in fact, he was preparing
Speaker 4: to bring his kids to the island in the early
Speaker 4: twenty teens. I mean, you've got Cash and Dan and
Speaker 4: Pam and all of the other people at the top
Speaker 4: levels of justice which are all covering up, and not
Speaker 4: just covering up, but actively overtly destroying their reputations. To
Speaker 4: everybody with eyes to see and ears to hear, who
Speaker 4: has any an IQ north of room temp is all
Speaker 4: concluding the same thing. These people are all liars and frauds,
Speaker 4: and they're all like, that's the hard for some people.
Speaker 4: The more blue pill they go, Clint, you think they're
Speaker 4: all lying. Yes, they're all lying. So once you realize
Speaker 4: that they're all lying, you have to ask yourself why.
Speaker 4: And if you ask yourself why, I think the only
Speaker 4: conclusion you can come to is that this is it.
Speaker 4: This is the apex, This is the heart of darkness.
Speaker 4: This is how the fucking system actually runs. And if
Speaker 4: the people really see it, they if they not just
Speaker 4: see it, but they believe it, they feel it in
Speaker 4: their core, they have no choice but to demand that
Speaker 4: this system falls. And for that reason alone, they cannot
Speaker 4: allow for justice to be had in this case. And
Speaker 4: they have to lie, and they have to obfuscate, and
Speaker 4: they have to try and bury it as much as
Speaker 4: they possibly can, and they will use their media apparatics.
Speaker 4: They will use the exact same fixer mentality that Epstein
Speaker 4: operated with. They're going to use all of their influence,
Speaker 4: all of their contacts in media and government, in corporate
Speaker 4: America to cover up this shit, just the same as
Speaker 4: he would do if he was still alive, and who knows,
Speaker 4: maybe he is.
Speaker 14: What's the mission, Oh, I know what the mission is.
Speaker 14: The mission is to take orders from your daddy Benjamin
Speaker 14: at Yahoo okay, spill us blood and use us money
Speaker 14: to help Israel build its empire. That's what this is
Speaker 14: all about. It's so stupid and it's so infuriating.
Speaker 4: And I'll let Annacasparian basically recap my feelings because she
Speaker 4: does such a good job of kind of funneling the
Speaker 4: energy that I have about these issues. But that's the truth, man.
Speaker 4: I really think that's why our foreign policy is the
Speaker 4: way it is. I think the whole reason that Trump
Speaker 4: continues to just be humiliated by his relationship with that
Speaker 4: Yahoo is that there is leverage. There is massive life
Speaker 4: ending or altering leverage that just simply cannot allow to
Speaker 4: come out. And the really scary thing is, I'm not
Speaker 4: even sure that Trump is guilty of doing anything the
Speaker 4: farious with you underage people, or really any of the
Speaker 4: sexual stuff with the Epstein network. I think that he's
Speaker 4: under moratl threat. Like that's my honest read of it.
Speaker 4: Because if it's just him like infidelity, like if he's
Speaker 4: just cheating on a wife or something and Epstein got
Speaker 4: him caught up in that, trust me, Trump is not
Speaker 4: going to let his life be ruined because he wants
Speaker 4: photos of him with some hooker buried. Like. It's bigger,
Speaker 4: it's much much deeper than that. I think it's existential.
Speaker 4: I think it's threats against him or his family. That's
Speaker 4: the only assumption I can come to. But when you
Speaker 4: spend the better part of a decade saying how the
Speaker 4: Iraq War was such a disaster, and then you turn
Speaker 4: around after campaigning in twenty twenty four saying no more wars,
Speaker 4: particularly in Middle East, and then it's not even six
Speaker 4: months before you're dropping bombs in Iran, and then just
Speaker 4: six months after that, you've got an armada sailing towards
Speaker 4: Tehran to go to war again. And I'm just thinking
Speaker 4: to myself, like, are these stories actually separate, because they
Speaker 4: don't feel separate to me. They feel intricately linked. They
Speaker 4: feel fully intertwined with one another. They feel like our
Speaker 4: foreign policy in Epstein's network from Ahud Barak, who was
Speaker 4: the top intel guy for Israel, the top guy who
Speaker 4: spent thirty six fucking visits with Epstein in a two
Speaker 4: year period after he leaves the Prime ministership. I don't
Speaker 4: see my family that often, not even close. Thirty six
Speaker 4: times and a two year period. Are you fucking kidding me?
Speaker 4: This is like he's got thirty years of experiences from
Speaker 4: you know, intel to military to the highest levels of
Speaker 4: government in Israel, and he's like b F f's with
Speaker 4: Jeffrey Epstein, and they just want to pretend as if oh,
Speaker 4: he's he's definitely you know, uh, he's obviously a Katari asset, right.
Speaker 4: Oh No, it's very obvious it's very obvious. And then
Speaker 4: on top of that, throughout these emails, if you want
Speaker 4: to get really radicalized, he's just constantly, constantly referring to
Speaker 4: the superiority of his bloodline. You know why versus you know,
Speaker 4: the people like me. I don't even know if I'm
Speaker 4: allowed to say it sounds like boy, but it uh
Speaker 4: starts with the G right. He's just saying that all
Speaker 4: the time. So in conclusion, Uh, this is why I
Speaker 4: think people like Candace Owns and myself and so many
Speaker 4: others have stopped talking about, you know, midterm politics. It's
Speaker 4: just like once for Candace it was because her friend
Speaker 4: Charlie Kirk was assassinated, totally understandable. For me, it was that,
Speaker 4: but it was also just the unbelievable betrayal from the
Speaker 4: DOJ in the FBI. And I know that sounds crazy
Speaker 4: to say that we were betrayed by them, but like
Speaker 4: they pretended to be different, they weren't. They were the
Speaker 4: exact same Christopher Ray type of garbage. So when Tim
Speaker 4: Poole starts talking about how if you guys don't stop
Speaker 4: talking about this stuff, we're gonna lose the midterms. And
Speaker 4: I'm not saying he's said it about this, but he
Speaker 4: said it about the Charliekirk stuff and a whole bunch
Speaker 4: of other stuff in the past. It's like, we don't
Speaker 4: fucking care about your midterms. It's not there is no
Speaker 4: electoral avenue to remedy what is so obviously egregiously a moral, illegal,
Speaker 4: depraved at the highest levels of government, corporate America, across
Speaker 4: the board, Hollywood, the media, everything, this is this touch
Speaker 4: is fucking everything, and there was no justice to be found.
Speaker 4: There's nothing we can do about it. We explicitly voted
Speaker 4: for the President of the United States to remedy this,
Speaker 4: and he can't or won't do it either. So when
Speaker 4: you talk to me about midterms, when you talk about
Speaker 4: voting for the Republicans or the Democrats, I respond to you,
Speaker 4: why what is the difference here? Is justice actually on
Speaker 4: the ballot? Because everybody else who's paying attention has come
Speaker 4: to the obvious conclusion that the answer is null. Justice
Speaker 4: is not on offer, and until we come to terms
Speaker 4: with that, nothing can change. But that doesn't mean that
Speaker 4: you shouldn't be responding to every single person that tells
Speaker 4: you there's nothing that can be done, especially if they're
Speaker 4: in a position where something should be done with this,
Speaker 4: but that's simply not possible.
Speaker 7: Why isn't it possible?
Speaker 10: It's just not.
Speaker 9: Why not your stupid.
Speaker 4: Faster until we get an answer as to why Cash
Speaker 4: Betel and Pam Bondi and Dan Bongino. Hi, Dan, I
Speaker 4: know you're back on the air. It'd be nice if
Speaker 4: you were to tell us the truth now. I'm sure
Speaker 4: you won't, or Donald Trump or anybody body else in
Speaker 4: this administration, or anybody in the media for that matter,
Speaker 4: Do not relent. Just continue to drive this point home.
Speaker 4: Why can't you, you stupid bastard, Why can't you deliver justice?
Speaker 4: We're talking about kids, for God's sakes. If you can't
Speaker 4: get justice in this arena, well then don't fucking lecture
Speaker 4: me about anything ever. Again. I have no respect for you.
Speaker 4: I have no reason to think that you'd ever accomplish
Speaker 4: anything that benefits me whatsoever. You're obviously depraved, if not
Speaker 4: working for the devil himself. I want nothing to do
Speaker 4: with you, nothing, And I think that's how everybody feels,
Speaker 4: anybody who's being honest about this. And look, a story
Speaker 4: like this is very easy to just completely wreck people.
Speaker 4: It's so easy to radicalize people and just make them
Speaker 4: feel like there's no hope. I get it. I would
Speaker 4: definitely read the Bible. I'm not going to dismiss that
Speaker 4: at all. Go read the Bible. But I would also
Speaker 4: say for the handful of people that are doing the
Speaker 4: right things Thomas Massey, Rocanna, Even though I don't like
Speaker 4: Rokanna's politics on this topic, he stood up, so God
Speaker 4: bless him for that. MTG. The handful of people that
Speaker 4: showed fucking morality, spine backbone. We need to marshal our
Speaker 4: forces to make sure that these people are uplifted. They
Speaker 4: are the only thing keeping the white Walkers from crossing over.
Speaker 4: Like that's all we got left. So all in with that,
Speaker 4: Thomas Massey twenty twenty eight or bust that's it. That's
Speaker 4: the only If you're looking for electoral options, that's the
Speaker 4: only answer I got for you. Thomas Massey, twenty twenty eight.
Speaker 4: Please are with the like button, subscribe, leave it comment
Speaker 4: down below. Appreciate you guys. Sorry it took me a
Speaker 4: couple days to get another episode out. I slept for
Speaker 4: like forty hours over the weekend. I don't know if
Speaker 4: I got a virus or something, but it feels like
Speaker 4: maybe I've got like low case COVID. I don't know. Anyways,
Speaker 4: I'm starting to bounce back a little bit, but I'll
Speaker 4: be back to you soon. You guys, please subscribe to
Speaker 4: Liberty Lockdown. Great podcast.
Speaker 15: Clint is tight and no, he made a statement about
Speaker 15: me and Jeffrey Epstein's I have nothing to do with that.
Speaker 15: I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstin. And in fact,
Speaker 15: if you look at the DOJ they announced, you know,
Speaker 15: they released three median pages. It's like, this is all
Speaker 15: they're supposed to be doing. And frankly, the DOJ I
Speaker 15: think should just say we have other things to do.