WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Astronomy Daily. I'm your host Anna. On today's

2
00:00:04.440 --> 00:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>cosmic Journey, we're exploring some truly mind bending developments in

3
00:00:08.199 --> 00:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the world of space and astronomy. The universe has thrown

4
00:00:11.279 --> 00:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>scientists a major curveball, with new findings suggesting our understanding

5
00:00:15.320 --> 00:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of dark energy might be completely wrong. We'll also look

6
00:00:18.800 --> 00:00:22.519
<v Speaker 1>at the ongoing saga of Boeing's troubled Starliner spacecraft and

7
00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:26.519
<v Speaker 1>China's ambitious plans to enter the crude spaceflight arena. Plus,

8
00:00:26.519 --> 00:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got fascinating discoveries to share, from an exoplanet so

9
00:00:30.199 --> 00:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>strangely light that scientists can't figure out what it's made of,

10
00:00:33.399 --> 00:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to dramatic evidence of a white dwarf star actually devouring

11
00:00:37.240 --> 00:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>one of its planets. And we'll explore new research suggesting

12
00:00:40.560 --> 00:00:43.719
<v Speaker 1>that the beautiful feathery structures seen in spiral galaxies might

13
00:00:43.799 --> 00:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>form through surprisingly simple physics. So buckle up for a

14
00:00:47.600 --> 00:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>tour of the latest breakthroughs and mysteries from the cosmos

15
00:00:51.280 --> 00:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>as we journey together through the wonders of our universe.

16
00:00:54.960 --> 00:00:58.399
<v Speaker 1>And this first story is a real mind bender. The

17
00:00:58.520 --> 00:01:01.479
<v Speaker 1>universe just might be weirder than we can thought. Astronomers

18
00:01:01.520 --> 00:01:04.519
<v Speaker 1>studying the largest ever map of the cosmos have uncovered

19
00:01:04.560 --> 00:01:07.799
<v Speaker 1>evidence that could dramatically shake our fundamental understanding of how

20
00:01:07.799 --> 00:01:12.599
<v Speaker 1>the universe works. Using the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument known

21
00:01:12.640 --> 00:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>as DS, scientists have analyzed nearly fifteen million galaxies and

22
00:01:16.920 --> 00:01:20.879
<v Speaker 1>quasers spanning an incredible eleven billion years of cosmic time,

23
00:01:21.319 --> 00:01:23.519
<v Speaker 1>and what they found suggests we might have gotten dark

24
00:01:23.640 --> 00:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>energy completely wrong. Dark energy, that mysterious force believed to

25
00:01:27.519 --> 00:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>be driving the accelerating expansion of our universe has long

26
00:01:30.959 --> 00:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>been thought to be constant, but this new analysis hints

27
00:01:34.319 --> 00:01:37.719
<v Speaker 1>at something far more complex. Dark energy may actually be

28
00:01:37.799 --> 00:01:41.359
<v Speaker 1>evolving over time. This isn't just a minor adjustment to

29
00:01:41.400 --> 00:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>our models. It's potentially a complete rewrite of the prevailing

30
00:01:45.120 --> 00:01:49.079
<v Speaker 1>lambda CDM model of cosmology that scientists have relied on

31
00:01:49.120 --> 00:01:53.599
<v Speaker 1>for decades. The findings came from combining Dessi's observations with

32
00:01:53.680 --> 00:01:58.159
<v Speaker 1>other critical data, including information from star explosions, the cosmic

33
00:01:58.200 --> 00:02:04.159
<v Speaker 1>microwave background, and weak gravitational lensing. Together, these diverse observations

34
00:02:04.200 --> 00:02:07.959
<v Speaker 1>point to the same surprising conclusion. The fundamental force we

35
00:02:08.000 --> 00:02:11.599
<v Speaker 1>thought was constant throughout cosmic history appears to be changing.

36
00:02:12.719 --> 00:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>David Schlegel, a DESI project scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley

37
00:02:16.599 --> 00:02:20.639
<v Speaker 1>National Laboratory, put it plainly. It's true that the dc

38
00:02:20.719 --> 00:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>results alone are consistent with the simplest explanation for dark energy,

39
00:02:24.520 --> 00:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>which would be an unchanging cosmological constant. But we can't

40
00:02:28.000 --> 00:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>ignore other data that extend to both the earlier and

41
00:02:30.319 --> 00:02:34.439
<v Speaker 1>later universe. Combining Dessi's results with those other data is

42
00:02:34.439 --> 00:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>when it gets truly weird, and it appears that this

43
00:02:36.960 --> 00:02:40.759
<v Speaker 1>dark energy must be dynamic, meaning that it changes with time.

44
00:02:41.840 --> 00:02:46.319
<v Speaker 1>This realization puts science at a remarkable crossroads. Dark energy

45
00:02:46.360 --> 00:02:49.639
<v Speaker 1>and dark matter together make up approximately ninety five percent

46
00:02:49.680 --> 00:02:53.439
<v Speaker 1>of our universe, yet they remain largely mysterious as they

47
00:02:53.479 --> 00:02:57.199
<v Speaker 1>don't interact with light and can't be detected directly. If

48
00:02:57.319 --> 00:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>dark energy is indeed changing over time, it would force

49
00:03:00.479 --> 00:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>us to completely rethink the Lambda CDM model that maps

50
00:03:03.680 --> 00:03:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the growth of the cosmos and predicts its ultimate fate.

51
00:03:07.479 --> 00:03:11.159
<v Speaker 1>As astrophysicist Katherine Hayman's from the University of Edinburgh noted,

52
00:03:11.639 --> 00:03:13.919
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of exciting that the universe has thrown us

53
00:03:13.919 --> 00:03:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a curveball here. The existing theories simply don't align with

54
00:03:17.759 --> 00:03:21.159
<v Speaker 1>what we're now observing the numbers don't add up, and

55
00:03:21.199 --> 00:03:24.719
<v Speaker 1>scientists are facing the thrilling and terrifying prospect of having

56
00:03:24.800 --> 00:03:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to develop new physics to explain what's happening. What makes

57
00:03:28.719 --> 00:03:32.199
<v Speaker 1>this finding particularly compelling is that it pushes the observation's

58
00:03:32.240 --> 00:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>disagreement with the standard model to the very edge of

59
00:03:36.000 --> 00:03:41.159
<v Speaker 1>what physicists consider a significant discovery. With more data collection underway,

60
00:03:41.479 --> 00:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>we may soon cross that threshold and enter a new

61
00:03:44.400 --> 00:03:49.199
<v Speaker 1>era of cosmological understanding. If dark energy is indeed evolving,

62
00:03:49.599 --> 00:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at a fundamental shift in our understanding of

63
00:03:52.319 --> 00:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the universe. This isn't just an academic concern. It has

64
00:03:56.319 --> 00:03:59.439
<v Speaker 1>profound implications for the ultimate fate of everything we know.

65
00:04:00.240 --> 00:04:03.639
<v Speaker 1>For decades, cosmologists have built their models on the assumption

66
00:04:03.719 --> 00:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that dark energy remains constant throughout cosmic time, exerting a

67
00:04:08.039 --> 00:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>steady outward pressure that counteracts gravity's inward pull. What's particularly

68
00:04:13.439 --> 00:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>striking about DS's findings is how they transform when combined

69
00:04:17.600 --> 00:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>with other cosmic observations. While desi's data alone shows only

70
00:04:22.399 --> 00:04:26.319
<v Speaker 1>a weak tension with the standard lambda CDM model, adding

71
00:04:26.360 --> 00:04:31.319
<v Speaker 1>information from the cosmic microwave background, supernovas and gravitational lensing

72
00:04:31.399 --> 00:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>pushes this discrepancy to near discovery levels. The statistical significance

73
00:04:36.040 --> 00:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>approaches what physicists call a five sigma result, the gold

74
00:04:39.879 --> 00:04:44.079
<v Speaker 1>standard for declaring a new discovery in physics. According to Schlegel,

75
00:04:44.360 --> 00:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>these combined observations suggest that either dark energy is becoming

76
00:04:48.759 --> 00:04:51.639
<v Speaker 1>less important today or it was more important early in

77
00:04:51.680 --> 00:04:56.199
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Either scenario would dramatically alter our understanding of

78
00:04:56.240 --> 00:05:00.759
<v Speaker 1>cosmic evolution. If dark energy weakens over time, the universe's

79
00:05:00.800 --> 00:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>expansion might eventually slow, potentially even reversing into a Big crunch. Conversely,

80
00:05:06.839 --> 00:05:09.639
<v Speaker 1>if dark energy strengthened in the past and maintains its

81
00:05:09.680 --> 00:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>current level, we could be headed for an accelerated expansion

82
00:05:12.759 --> 00:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that tears apart galaxies, stars, and eventually atoms themselves, the

83
00:05:17.079 --> 00:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>so called Big Rip scenario. This discovery challenges Einstein's cosmological constant,

84
00:05:23.000 --> 00:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>represented by Lambda in the Lambda CDM model. Einstein originally

85
00:05:27.560 --> 00:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>introduced this constant as a mathematical fudge factor to create

86
00:05:31.040 --> 00:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a static universe, later calling it his greatest blunder when

87
00:05:34.680 --> 00:05:39.639
<v Speaker 1>the expanding universe was discovered. Ironically, dark energy later revived

88
00:05:39.680 --> 00:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>this concept, but now even this updated version appears insufficient.

89
00:05:44.439 --> 00:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Adam Reese, who won the twenty eleven Nobel Prize in

90
00:05:47.160 --> 00:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Physics for discovering dark energy's accelerating effect, considers this potentially

91
00:05:52.240 --> 00:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the biggest hint we have about the nature of dark

92
00:05:54.839 --> 00:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>energy in the twenty five years since we discovered it.

93
00:05:57.839 --> 00:06:01.519
<v Speaker 1>As he explains, if confirmed and it literally says, dark

94
00:06:01.639 --> 00:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>energy is not what most everyone thought a static source

95
00:06:04.720 --> 00:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of energy, but perhaps something even more exotic. Fortunately, a

96
00:06:09.079 --> 00:06:12.639
<v Speaker 1>fleet of new experiments is joining the investigation. The EUCLID

97
00:06:12.720 --> 00:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Space Telescope, NASA's Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, and desaih itself,

98
00:06:18.120 --> 00:06:21.959
<v Speaker 1>which will eventually measure fifty million galaxies and quasars, will

99
00:06:22.000 --> 00:06:26.079
<v Speaker 1>provide unprecedented data to confirm or refute these findings. These

100
00:06:26.120 --> 00:06:29.519
<v Speaker 1>observations will help determine whether we're truly witnessing the beginning

101
00:06:29.519 --> 00:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>of a cosmological revolution. What makes this scientific moment so

102
00:06:33.360 --> 00:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>exciting is its profound uncertainty. We stand at the threshold

103
00:06:37.680 --> 00:06:42.319
<v Speaker 1>of potentially rewriting our understanding of the universe's basic operating principles.

104
00:06:42.920 --> 00:06:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Dark energy may be losing strength as the universe ages,

105
00:06:46.360 --> 00:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>or it might have played a more significant role in

106
00:06:48.399 --> 00:06:52.519
<v Speaker 1>the early universe than previously thought. Either way, the implications

107
00:06:52.600 --> 00:06:55.439
<v Speaker 1>ripple through every aspect of cosmology, from the birth of

108
00:06:55.480 --> 00:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>the first stars to the ultimate destiny of all cosmic structures.

109
00:07:00.759 --> 00:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Next up in today's news, Boeing's troubled Starliner spacecraft is

110
00:07:04.720 --> 00:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>facing yet another setback, with NASA officials now considering whether

111
00:07:08.560 --> 00:07:11.319
<v Speaker 1>a third uncrewed test flight will be necessary before the

112
00:07:11.399 --> 00:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>vehicle can carry astronauts again. This comes after what was

113
00:07:15.240 --> 00:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be an eight day test mission turned into

114
00:07:18.399 --> 00:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a nine month ordeal for astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunny Williams,

115
00:07:22.560 --> 00:07:25.519
<v Speaker 1>the two NASA astronauts, finally returned to Earth this week,

116
00:07:25.920 --> 00:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>but not on the Boeing spacecraft that took them to

117
00:07:28.160 --> 00:07:31.839
<v Speaker 1>the International Space Station. Instead, they splashed down in a

118
00:07:31.879 --> 00:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX Dragon capsule, a vivid illustration of how Boeing's technical

119
00:07:36.279 --> 00:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>problems have forced NASA to rely on its competitor. We're

120
00:07:40.160 --> 00:07:42.959
<v Speaker 1>looking at some options for Starliner should we need to

121
00:07:43.240 --> 00:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a flying at uncrewed, Steve Stitch, chief of NASA's Commercial

122
00:07:47.160 --> 00:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Crew Program, told reporters the space agency wants to validate

123
00:07:51.040 --> 00:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that Starliner's thrusters can perform as designed in the unforgiving

124
00:07:54.920 --> 00:07:59.319
<v Speaker 1>environment of space, something impossible to fully simulate in ground tests.

125
00:08:00.199 --> 00:08:03.879
<v Speaker 1>The issues with Starliner's first crude mission emerged shortly after launch,

126
00:08:04.199 --> 00:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>when the spacecraft suffered five thruster failures and experienced concerning

127
00:08:08.040 --> 00:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>leaks of helium, which is used to pressurize the propulsion system.

128
00:08:12.160 --> 00:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>These problems were serious enough that NASA determined it would

129
00:08:15.160 --> 00:08:17.639
<v Speaker 1>be too risky for Wilmore and Williams to return on

130
00:08:17.680 --> 00:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the spacecraft, leaving it to fly back to Earth empty

131
00:08:20.720 --> 00:08:24.199
<v Speaker 1>while the astronauts remained on the station. For Boeing, this

132
00:08:24.360 --> 00:08:28.319
<v Speaker 1>represents not just a technical challenge, but a competitive disadvantage.

133
00:08:28.720 --> 00:08:32.759
<v Speaker 1>While Starliner has struggled through its development process, SpaceX's Crew

134
00:08:32.799 --> 00:08:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Dragon has already flown eleven astronaut missions for NASA, establishing

135
00:08:37.279 --> 00:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>itself as the reliable workhourse of America's human spaceflight program.

136
00:08:42.080 --> 00:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>The financial implications for Boeing are significant as well. The

137
00:08:45.639 --> 00:08:48.799
<v Speaker 1>aerospace giant has already absorbed more than two billion dollars

138
00:08:48.840 --> 00:08:52.759
<v Speaker 1>in charges related to Starliner development. Since twenty sixteen, the

139
00:08:52.799 --> 00:08:55.759
<v Speaker 1>sealing of Boeing's fixed price four point two billion dollars

140
00:08:56.600 --> 00:08:59.279
<v Speaker 1>NASA contract has grown by three hundred twenty six million

141
00:08:59.360 --> 00:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars since BA being awarded in twenty fourteen, with the

142
00:09:02.279 --> 00:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>company having received roughly half that amount during development. This

143
00:09:05.879 --> 00:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>stands in start contrast to SpaceX, which has not only

144
00:09:08.960 --> 00:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>successfully delivered on its initial contract but has secured additional

145
00:09:12.639 --> 00:09:16.799
<v Speaker 1>missions Due to Starliner's delays. The value of SpaceX's initial

146
00:09:16.799 --> 00:09:19.799
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars NASA contract has grown to nearly five

147
00:09:19.840 --> 00:09:23.399
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, largely because NASA has had to book extra

148
00:09:23.480 --> 00:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>dragonflights while waiting for Starliner to become operational. Boeing plans

149
00:09:28.159 --> 00:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a ground test this summer, focusing on propulsion system components

150
00:09:31.639 --> 00:09:35.879
<v Speaker 1>aimed at validating potential fixes, but the timeline for Starliner's

151
00:09:35.879 --> 00:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>next flight, crude or uncrewed, remains uncertain as NASA and

152
00:09:40.480 --> 00:09:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Boeing engineers work through the complex technical challenges that have

153
00:09:44.480 --> 00:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>plagued the spacecraft's development. The technical issues plaguing Starliner represent

154
00:09:49.960 --> 00:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>yet another costly setback for Boeing in what has become

155
00:09:53.200 --> 00:09:57.639
<v Speaker 1>an increasingly challenging development program. The aerospace giant has already

156
00:09:57.639 --> 00:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>invested more than two billion dollars of its own money

157
00:10:00.039 --> 00:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>into the spacecraft, trying to create a viable competitor to

158
00:10:03.360 --> 00:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX's crew Dragon. NASA officials are now carefully weighing their options,

159
00:10:09.080 --> 00:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>with Steve Stitch emphasizing that a key purpose of an

160
00:10:12.120 --> 00:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>additional uncrewded test would be to verify that Starliner's thrusters

161
00:10:16.240 --> 00:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>can perform properly in the vacuum of space. This propulsion

162
00:10:20.120 --> 00:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>system has proven particularly troublesome, with the thruster failures and

163
00:10:24.279 --> 00:10:28.039
<v Speaker 1>helium leaks during the first crude mission, highlighting problems that

164
00:10:28.080 --> 00:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be adequately identified during ground testing. Boeing's financial commitment

165
00:10:33.320 --> 00:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to Starliner keeps growing beyond initial projections. The ceiling of

166
00:10:37.480 --> 00:10:40.799
<v Speaker 1>their fixed price NASA contract has expanded by three hundred

167
00:10:40.879 --> 00:10:44.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty six million dollars since being awarded a decade ago,

168
00:10:44.919 --> 00:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>reaching four point two billion dollars total, Yet the company

169
00:10:48.639 --> 00:10:51.159
<v Speaker 1>has only received about half that amount so far during

170
00:10:51.200 --> 00:10:56.799
<v Speaker 1>the development phase, with certification for routine flights still elusive. Meanwhile,

171
00:10:56.960 --> 00:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Boeing isn't just looking at Starliner as a NASA taxi service.

172
00:11:01.159 --> 00:11:04.559
<v Speaker 1>The company has broader commercial aspirations to use the spacecraft

173
00:11:04.559 --> 00:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>for transporting customers to and from privately built space stations

174
00:11:08.559 --> 00:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>currently in early development. This represents the kind of non

175
00:11:12.039 --> 00:11:15.919
<v Speaker 1>government revenue stream that SpaceX has already started capturing with

176
00:11:15.919 --> 00:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>its fully private Dragon missions, but Starliner's uncertain future complicates

177
00:11:20.440 --> 00:11:24.519
<v Speaker 1>these commercial ambitions. A NASA Safety advisory panel noted in

178
00:11:24.600 --> 00:11:28.759
<v Speaker 1>January that while significant progress was being made in postflight

179
00:11:28.799 --> 00:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>technical investigations, the propulsion system issues remain unresolved. Until Boeing

180
00:11:34.600 --> 00:11:39.039
<v Speaker 1>can definitively fix these problems, Starliner's path to certification and

181
00:11:39.080 --> 00:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>commercial viability remains blocked. The contrast with SpaceX grows starker

182
00:11:43.879 --> 00:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>with each passing year. While Starliner has yet to complete

183
00:11:47.159 --> 00:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a fully successful crude mission crew, Dragon has become the

184
00:11:50.600 --> 00:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>workhourse of America's human spaceflight program, with eleven successful astronaut

185
00:11:55.360 --> 00:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>missions already completed. This operational track record gives SpaceX a

186
00:12:00.159 --> 00:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>tremendous advantage in both government and private markets. For Boeing,

187
00:12:05.600 --> 00:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the stakes go beyond just this spacecraft program. The company's

188
00:12:09.480 --> 00:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>reputation as a premier aerospace manufacturer has already faced challenges

189
00:12:13.720 --> 00:12:17.519
<v Speaker 1>with its commercial airline issues. Starliner was meant to showcase

190
00:12:17.559 --> 00:12:21.559
<v Speaker 1>Boeing's capabilities in the growing commercial space sector, but instead

191
00:12:21.600 --> 00:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the ongoing difficulties have highlighted the company's struggles to deliver

192
00:12:25.039 --> 00:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>complex space systems on budget and on schedule. Meanwhile, China's

193
00:12:30.080 --> 00:12:32.799
<v Speaker 1>space industry seems to be going from strength to strength.

194
00:12:33.480 --> 00:12:35.519
<v Speaker 1>In a bold move that signals a new era for

195
00:12:35.600 --> 00:12:39.279
<v Speaker 1>China's space ambitions, a commercial space company called Beijing z

196
00:12:39.440 --> 00:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Way Yutong Technology, better known as AZ Space, has announced

197
00:12:43.639 --> 00:12:47.159
<v Speaker 1>plans to conduct orbital crude flight tests by twenty twenty

198
00:12:47.200 --> 00:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>seven or twenty twenty eight. This represents a significant milestone

199
00:12:51.480 --> 00:12:55.159
<v Speaker 1>for China's commercial space sector, which until now has seen

200
00:12:55.240 --> 00:13:00.080
<v Speaker 1>human spaceflight as the exclusive domain of government agencies. K

201
00:13:00.080 --> 00:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Shiao Min, chairman of AIDS Space, made the announcement to

202
00:13:03.679 --> 00:13:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Chinese media last week, setting a timeline that would make

203
00:13:06.840 --> 00:13:10.519
<v Speaker 1>his company the first private Chinese entity to send humans

204
00:13:10.559 --> 00:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to orbit. While China's government run human spaceflight program has

205
00:13:15.039 --> 00:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>successfully operated the Tiangong space station using Shenzho spacecraft launched

206
00:13:20.200 --> 00:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on Long March rockets, this would mark the first time

207
00:13:23.039 --> 00:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a commercial company attempts such a mission. Founded just five

208
00:13:26.480 --> 00:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago in twenty nineteen, AZ Space has focused its

209
00:13:30.159 --> 00:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>business on spacecraft manufacturing and space tourism. The relatively young

210
00:13:35.159 --> 00:13:39.039
<v Speaker 1>company has secured backing from several venture capital firms, though

211
00:13:39.080 --> 00:13:44.039
<v Speaker 1>specific funding details for their ambitious human spaceflight program weren't disclosed.

212
00:13:44.639 --> 00:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>This leaves questions about how the company will finance such

213
00:13:47.320 --> 00:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a technically challenging and expensive endeavor. The path to crewed

214
00:13:52.000 --> 00:13:56.159
<v Speaker 1>spaceflight involves several intermediate steps, which, as space has already begun.

215
00:13:56.639 --> 00:13:59.159
<v Speaker 1>The company has more immediate plans for twenty twenty five,

216
00:13:59.440 --> 00:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>including life launches of their self developed B three hundred

217
00:14:02.399 --> 00:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>spacecraft and the more advanced Deer five spacecraft. These missions

218
00:14:06.480 --> 00:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>are scheduled for July and September this year, respectively, with

219
00:14:09.879 --> 00:14:14.559
<v Speaker 1>Jang explaining that these spacecraft will conduct critical on orbit, docking, verification,

220
00:14:14.960 --> 00:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and re entry tests. This follows Azy Space's December twenty

221
00:14:18.759 --> 00:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty three launch of their Deer one spacecraft aboard an

222
00:14:21.480 --> 00:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I Space Hyperbola one rocket. The company is also developing

223
00:14:25.159 --> 00:14:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the larger C two thousand spacecraft with a two thousand

224
00:14:27.960 --> 00:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>kilograms payload capacity, which they see as a stepping stone

225
00:14:31.200 --> 00:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>toward their ultimate goal of human rated spacecraft. While the

226
00:14:35.399 --> 00:14:41.279
<v Speaker 1>timeline appears highly ambitious by global spaceflight standards, the announcement

227
00:14:41.360 --> 00:14:44.879
<v Speaker 1>comes in the context of strong governmental support for China's

228
00:14:44.879 --> 00:14:49.399
<v Speaker 1>commercial space sector. The central government has designated commercial space

229
00:14:49.480 --> 00:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>as a key emerging industry to be supported and promoted,

230
00:14:53.440 --> 00:14:56.919
<v Speaker 1>with local and provincial governments actively working to attract space

231
00:14:56.919 --> 00:15:01.519
<v Speaker 1>companies and foster innovation ecosystems. What remains unclear is whether

232
00:15:01.600 --> 00:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>azy space will have access to state owned technology for

233
00:15:04.799 --> 00:15:09.399
<v Speaker 1>their reusable and crude spacecraft plans, or if they'll need

234
00:15:09.440 --> 00:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to develop these critical systems independently. Either way, this announcement

235
00:15:14.360 --> 00:15:18.159
<v Speaker 1>signals that China's commercial space race is accelerating to new heights.

236
00:15:19.200 --> 00:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>China's approach to commercial space has evolved dramatically over the

237
00:15:22.200 --> 00:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>past decade. When the government first began opening the sector

238
00:15:25.519 --> 00:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to private capital in late twenty fourteen, the initial focus

239
00:15:29.080 --> 00:15:33.679
<v Speaker 1>was quite narrow, primarily small launch vehicles and satellites. This

240
00:15:33.759 --> 00:15:36.799
<v Speaker 1>marked a significant shift from the exclusively state run space

241
00:15:36.840 --> 00:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>program that had defined China's approach for decades. In the

242
00:15:40.799 --> 00:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>years that followed, we've seen a remarkable expansion in both

243
00:15:43.879 --> 00:15:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the scope and ambition of China's commercial space ventures. What

244
00:15:47.759 --> 00:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>began with modest rockets and small satellites has progressively grown

245
00:15:51.279 --> 00:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to encompass ever larger liquid propellant launchers with potential reusability,

246
00:15:56.440 --> 00:16:01.399
<v Speaker 1>diverse space systems and applications, remote sensing and communecations, constellations,

247
00:16:01.840 --> 00:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and more recently, low cost, reusable cargo spacecraft designed to

248
00:16:05.759 --> 00:16:09.759
<v Speaker 1>service the Tiangong Space Station. The emergence of two planned

249
00:16:10.039 --> 00:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>low Earth orbit mega constellations has provided a crucial market

250
00:16:13.720 --> 00:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for these commercial launch companies to establish themselves and

251
00:16:17.639 --> 00:16:21.559
<v Speaker 1>build sustainable business models. Much like we've seen with SpaceX

252
00:16:21.559 --> 00:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, these large satellite deployments create the

253
00:16:25.159 --> 00:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>consistent launch demand needed to justify investment in rocket development.

254
00:16:30.320 --> 00:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>With AZS Space now setting its sites on crude orbital spaceflight,

255
00:16:34.480 --> 00:16:36.679
<v Speaker 1>we're witnessing what appears to be the beginning of a

256
00:16:36.720 --> 00:16:41.039
<v Speaker 1>new phase in China's commercial space evolution. This represents a

257
00:16:41.080 --> 00:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>fundamental shift where private firms may soon undertake human spaceflight

258
00:16:45.279 --> 00:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>activities that have traditionally been the exclusive domain of China's

259
00:16:49.320 --> 00:16:53.679
<v Speaker 1>state run human spaceflight agency. This transformation is occurring with

260
00:16:53.720 --> 00:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>explicit government encouragement. China's central government has formally designated commercial

261
00:16:58.840 --> 00:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>space as a key emerging industry deserving of support and promotion.

262
00:17:03.799 --> 00:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>This top down endorsement cascades through various levels of government,

263
00:17:07.920 --> 00:17:11.839
<v Speaker 1>with local and provincial authorities actively competing to attract commercial

264
00:17:11.880 --> 00:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>space companies to their regions through incentives and infrastructure development.

265
00:17:17.160 --> 00:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>The strategy appears designed to foster innovation ecosystems around space

266
00:17:21.720 --> 00:17:26.759
<v Speaker 1>technology while maintaining strategic oversight of the sector's development. It

267
00:17:26.799 --> 00:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>creates a hybrid model where private capital and entrepreneurial energy

268
00:17:30.720 --> 00:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>can accelerate technological progress and commercial applications, while the government

269
00:17:35.279 --> 00:17:39.759
<v Speaker 1>maintains involvement in critical aspects of space development. As this

270
00:17:39.880 --> 00:17:43.799
<v Speaker 1>landscape continues to evolve, the boundaries between commercial and state

271
00:17:43.880 --> 00:17:48.559
<v Speaker 1>space activities in China may become increasingly fluid, potentially creating

272
00:17:48.599 --> 00:17:51.519
<v Speaker 1>new models for how public and private sectors collaborate in

273
00:17:51.559 --> 00:17:57.279
<v Speaker 1>space exploration and utilization. In a fascinating discovery that highlights

274
00:17:57.319 --> 00:18:00.799
<v Speaker 1>the diversity of worlds beyond our Solar system, astronomers have

275
00:18:00.839 --> 00:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>recently identified two exoplanets orbiting a star called TOI one thousand,

276
00:18:05.480 --> 00:18:09.319
<v Speaker 1>four hundred fifty three, located approximately two hundred and fifty

277
00:18:09.359 --> 00:18:13.519
<v Speaker 1>light years away in the Draco constellation. These newly found

278
00:18:13.559 --> 00:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>worlds represent planetary types that are actually quite common throughout

279
00:18:17.160 --> 00:18:20.839
<v Speaker 1>our galaxy, but completely absent from our own Solar System.

280
00:18:21.759 --> 00:18:26.279
<v Speaker 1>The discovery team used NASA's Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite or

281
00:18:26.359 --> 00:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>tests along with the HARPS in high resolution spectrograph to

282
00:18:30.359 --> 00:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>confirm these distant worlds. What makes this finding particularly exciting

283
00:18:35.920 --> 00:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is the nature of the planets themselves. One is classified

284
00:18:39.920 --> 00:18:42.759
<v Speaker 1>as a super earth, while the other is what astronomers

285
00:18:42.839 --> 00:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>call a sub neptune. While both planets are intriguing, it's

286
00:18:46.720 --> 00:18:50.799
<v Speaker 1>the sub neptune, designated TOI one thousand, four hundred fifty

287
00:18:50.839 --> 00:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>three C that has astronomers truly puzzled. This world is

288
00:18:54.720 --> 00:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>approximately two point two times the size of Earth, which

289
00:18:57.960 --> 00:19:02.039
<v Speaker 1>isn't unusual for its type. However, what's extraordinary is its mass,

290
00:19:02.640 --> 00:19:05.839
<v Speaker 1>measuring just two point nine times that of Earth. This

291
00:19:05.920 --> 00:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>creates an extremely low density that has left scientists scratching

292
00:19:09.240 --> 00:19:11.839
<v Speaker 1>their heads about what this planet could possibly be made of.

293
00:19:12.839 --> 00:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>To put this in perspective, this makes TOI one thousand,

294
00:19:16.480 --> 00:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and fifty three C one of the least

295
00:19:19.519 --> 00:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>dense sub neptunes ever discovered. The planet's lightweight nature suggests

296
00:19:23.920 --> 00:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>one of two fascinating possibilities. Either it has an unusually thick,

297
00:19:28.200 --> 00:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen rich atmosphere extending far above its surface, or perhaps

298
00:19:32.680 --> 00:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>its composition is dominated by water rather than rock. The

299
00:19:36.480 --> 00:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>combination of precise size and mass measurements allowed researchers to

300
00:19:40.480 --> 00:19:43.880
<v Speaker 1>calculate the planet's density with confidence, which is what revealed

301
00:19:43.960 --> 00:19:50.039
<v Speaker 1>this peculiar characteristic. As astrophysicist Manu Staalport, who worked on

302
00:19:50.079 --> 00:19:54.279
<v Speaker 1>the study, explained, the two planets present an interesting contrast

303
00:19:54.440 --> 00:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>in their characteristics. While two OI one thousand, four hundred

304
00:19:59.160 --> 00:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty three B appears to be a fairly typical rocky

305
00:20:02.319 --> 00:20:05.839
<v Speaker 1>super Earth orbiting close to its star with a four

306
00:20:05.839 --> 00:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>point three day cycle, two I one thousand, four hundred

307
00:20:09.519 --> 00:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty three C defies easy categorization. This puzzling world raises

308
00:20:15.240 --> 00:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>fundamental questions about planetary formation and evolution. How could a

309
00:20:19.759 --> 00:20:23.039
<v Speaker 1>planet grow to such a size while maintaining such low density,

310
00:20:23.880 --> 00:20:27.640
<v Speaker 1>what processes shaped its development, and what might its surface

311
00:20:27.720 --> 00:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>or atmosphere be like. These mysteries make TOI one thousand,

312
00:20:31.519 --> 00:20:35.079
<v Speaker 1>four hundred fifty three C an exceptionally promising target for

313
00:20:35.119 --> 00:20:38.839
<v Speaker 1>future atmospheric studies. The research team employed a two pronged

314
00:20:38.839 --> 00:20:43.279
<v Speaker 1>approach to characterize these distant worlds. The transit method, using

315
00:20:43.319 --> 00:20:46.759
<v Speaker 1>test data, revealed each planet's size and orbital period by

316
00:20:46.799 --> 00:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>measuring the slight dimming of starlight as they passed in

317
00:20:49.400 --> 00:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>front of their host star. Meanwhile, the radial velocity measurements

318
00:20:53.720 --> 00:20:57.839
<v Speaker 1>from Harpsend detected the subtle gravitational wobble each planet induces

319
00:20:57.880 --> 00:21:02.319
<v Speaker 1>on the star, allowing scientists to determine their masses. What's

320
00:21:02.359 --> 00:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly fascinating about the system is that the two planets

321
00:21:05.799 --> 00:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>orbit in a configuration close to what astronomers call a

322
00:21:08.759 --> 00:21:12.880
<v Speaker 1>three to two resonance. This means that for every three

323
00:21:13.000 --> 00:21:16.319
<v Speaker 1>complete orbits of the inner planet, the outer planet completes

324
00:21:16.359 --> 00:21:21.279
<v Speaker 1>almost exactly two. Such orbital resonances aren't random. They're considered

325
00:21:21.319 --> 00:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a natural consequence of orbital migration, providing important clues about

326
00:21:25.200 --> 00:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>how these planets moved and eventually settled into their current positions.

327
00:21:30.079 --> 00:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Two I one thousand, four hundred and fifty three ce's

328
00:21:32.799 --> 00:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily low density presents an exciting scientific puzzle. For a

329
00:21:37.680 --> 00:21:40.319
<v Speaker 1>planet its size to be so light weight, it must

330
00:21:40.319 --> 00:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>have a fundamentally different composition than the rocky worlds we're

331
00:21:43.279 --> 00:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>familiar with. The evidence points to either a substantial hydrogen

332
00:21:48.200 --> 00:21:53.079
<v Speaker 1>rich atmosphere that significantly increases the planet's diameter without adding

333
00:21:53.119 --> 00:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>much mass, or perhaps an interior largely composed of water

334
00:21:57.480 --> 00:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>rather than denser materials like rock and metal. And this

335
00:22:01.039 --> 00:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>makes TYI one thousand, four hundred fifty three C an

336
00:22:04.480 --> 00:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>ideal candidate for future atmospheric studies Using next generation instruments

337
00:22:08.920 --> 00:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>like the James Web Space Telescope. JWST's advanced capabilities could

338
00:22:14.279 --> 00:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>potentially analyze the planet's atmosphere, determining whether it's primarily hydrogen

339
00:22:19.359 --> 00:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>or water dominated, which would revolutionize our understanding of this

340
00:22:23.319 --> 00:22:28.319
<v Speaker 1>enigmatic world. The orbital resonance also suggests these planets have

341
00:22:28.400 --> 00:22:32.039
<v Speaker 1>remained dynamically stable for a long time, providing a window

342
00:22:32.160 --> 00:22:36.640
<v Speaker 1>into the system's formation history. Such configurations typically develop when

343
00:22:36.680 --> 00:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>planets migrate inward through their star's protoplanetary disc, gradually locking

344
00:22:41.440 --> 00:22:45.599
<v Speaker 1>into these synchronized orbits. If TOI one thousand, four hundred

345
00:22:45.599 --> 00:22:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and fifty three C does indeed have a substantial water component,

346
00:22:49.279 --> 00:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it would represent a fascinating planetary category, neither truly rocky

347
00:22:53.839 --> 00:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>like Earth nor gaseous like Neptune, but something in between

348
00:22:57.000 --> 00:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that we don't see in our Solar System understanding. So

349
00:23:00.240 --> 00:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>worlds could fundamentally reshape theories about how planets form and

350
00:23:04.240 --> 00:23:07.319
<v Speaker 1>what kinds of habitable environments might exist throughout the galaxy.

351
00:23:08.359 --> 00:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>And in another exciting discovery, scientists may have finally solved

352
00:23:12.359 --> 00:23:15.559
<v Speaker 1>a decade's old cosmic mystery that has puzzled astronomer since

353
00:23:15.640 --> 00:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty. Strange X ray emissions detected from the center

354
00:23:19.480 --> 00:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Helix nebula might actually be evidence of a

355
00:23:22.039 --> 00:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>planet being violently ripped apart and devoured by the dying

356
00:23:25.160 --> 00:23:28.640
<v Speaker 1>star at its core. The helix nebula represents the final

357
00:23:28.680 --> 00:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>stage of a dying star that has shed its outer layers,

358
00:23:31.880 --> 00:23:35.039
<v Speaker 1>leaving behind a small, dense remnant called a white dwarf.

359
00:23:35.559 --> 00:23:39.039
<v Speaker 1>What makes this particular white dwarf, designated WD twenty two

360
00:23:39.119 --> 00:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty six, two hundred and ten unusual is that it

361
00:23:43.160 --> 00:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be producing the powerful X rays that telescopes have

362
00:23:46.559 --> 00:23:50.839
<v Speaker 1>consistently detected for over forty years. Thanks to observations from

363
00:23:50.920 --> 00:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>NASA's Chandra X ray Observatory and the European Space Agency's XMM, Newton,

364
00:23:56.119 --> 00:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>researchers believe they finally cracked this cosmic case. The data

365
00:24:00.559 --> 00:24:04.799
<v Speaker 1>reveals a Neptune sized planet orbiting perilously close to the

366
00:24:04.839 --> 00:24:08.839
<v Speaker 1>white dwarf, completing a revolution in less than three days.

367
00:24:10.119 --> 00:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Even more intriguing evidence suggests there may have been a

368
00:24:13.480 --> 00:24:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Jupiter like planet orbiting even closer that met a catastrophic fate.

369
00:24:18.640 --> 00:24:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Lead author Sandino Estrata Dorado from the National Autonomous University

370
00:24:22.279 --> 00:24:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of Mexico explains, we think this X ray signal could

371
00:24:25.640 --> 00:24:28.799
<v Speaker 1>be from planetary debris pulled onto the White dwarf as

372
00:24:28.839 --> 00:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the death knell from a planet that was destroyed by

373
00:24:31.000 --> 00:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the White Dwarf in the Helix nebula, we might have

374
00:24:33.519 --> 00:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>finally found the cause of a mystery that's lasted over

375
00:24:35.960 --> 00:24:39.759
<v Speaker 1>forty years. The doomed planet likely began its life at

376
00:24:39.799 --> 00:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a safe distance from its star, but as the star

377
00:24:42.640 --> 00:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>aged and transformed into a white dwarf, the planet's orbit

378
00:24:46.480 --> 00:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>may have been disturbed by gravitational interactions with other planets

379
00:24:49.960 --> 00:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in the system. This migration brought it fatally close to

380
00:24:53.720 --> 00:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the White Dwarf, where intense gravitational forces began to tear

381
00:24:57.720 --> 00:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it apart. What astronomers our witnessing now appears to be

382
00:25:01.519 --> 00:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the aftermath of this cosmic destruction. As debris from the

383
00:25:05.279 --> 00:25:08.920
<v Speaker 1>shattered planet falls onto the white dwarf surface, it becomes

384
00:25:09.000 --> 00:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>superheated to millions of degrees, producing the telltale X ray

385
00:25:13.240 --> 00:25:17.880
<v Speaker 1>signature that astronomers have been detecting for decades. If confirmed

386
00:25:18.119 --> 00:25:20.839
<v Speaker 1>This would represent the first documented case of a planet

387
00:25:20.839 --> 00:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>being destroyed by the central star in a planetary nebula.

388
00:25:24.720 --> 00:25:28.319
<v Speaker 1>The observation offers a sobering glimpse into the potential fate

389
00:25:28.359 --> 00:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that awaits planet's orbiting aging stars, perhaps even our own

390
00:25:31.920 --> 00:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Solar System in the distant future. This discovery provides crucial

391
00:25:36.279 --> 00:25:39.519
<v Speaker 1>insights into the fate of planetary systems as their stars

392
00:25:39.599 --> 00:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>reach the end of their lives. What we're witnessing at

393
00:25:42.720 --> 00:25:45.319
<v Speaker 1>the Helix nebula may be a preview of what awaits

394
00:25:45.359 --> 00:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>countless other star systems, including possibly our own Solar System,

395
00:25:49.440 --> 00:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>billions of years in the future. The research team analyzed

396
00:25:53.519 --> 00:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>X ray data collected over multiple observations spanning a decade

397
00:25:57.240 --> 00:26:01.279
<v Speaker 1>and found something remarkable. The signal has remained relatively consistent

398
00:26:01.319 --> 00:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in brightness since the early nineteen nineties. This stability suggests

399
00:26:05.480 --> 00:26:08.839
<v Speaker 1>we're observing an ongoing process rather than a one time

400
00:26:08.920 --> 00:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic event. But within this consistent signal, astronomers detected subtle

401
00:26:14.160 --> 00:26:18.599
<v Speaker 1>fluctuations that repeat every two point nine hours, providing compelling

402
00:26:18.599 --> 00:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>evidence for planetary remains orbiting exceptionally close to the white dwarf.

403
00:26:23.880 --> 00:26:27.599
<v Speaker 1>Martin Guerrero from the Institute of Astrophysics of Andalusia explains

404
00:26:28.440 --> 00:26:31.079
<v Speaker 1>the mysterious signal we've been seeing could be caused by

405
00:26:31.079 --> 00:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the debris from the shattered planet falling onto the white

406
00:26:34.000 --> 00:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>dwarf's surface and being heated to glow in X rays.

407
00:26:37.920 --> 00:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>This steady stream of material creates a consistent energy signature

408
00:26:41.759 --> 00:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that telescopes can detect across vast distances. The research team

409
00:26:46.200 --> 00:26:50.599
<v Speaker 1>considered alternative explanations, including whether a low mass star rather

410
00:26:50.640 --> 00:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>than a planet, might have been destroyed. However, such stars

411
00:26:54.440 --> 00:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>are significantly more massive than Jupiter sized planets, making them

412
00:26:58.319 --> 00:27:00.519
<v Speaker 1>much less likely to be torn apart by the white

413
00:27:00.559 --> 00:27:05.799
<v Speaker 1>dwarf's gravity. Interestingly, WD twenty two twenty six two hundred

414
00:27:05.839 --> 00:27:08.559
<v Speaker 1>and ten shares X ray behavior similarities with two other

415
00:27:08.599 --> 00:27:12.839
<v Speaker 1>white dwarfs that are not inside planetary nebulas. One appears

416
00:27:12.839 --> 00:27:14.599
<v Speaker 1>to be pulling material from a planet in a more

417
00:27:14.599 --> 00:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>gradual fashion without complete destruction, while another is likely accreting

418
00:27:19.200 --> 00:27:22.599
<v Speaker 1>material from what remains of a destroyed planet. These three

419
00:27:22.640 --> 00:27:26.079
<v Speaker 1>white dwarfs may represent a newly recognized class of variable

420
00:27:26.119 --> 00:27:30.279
<v Speaker 1>objects that offers a window into different stages of planetary destruction.

421
00:27:31.000 --> 00:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>It's important to find more of these systems because they

422
00:27:33.400 --> 00:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>can teach us about the survival or destruction of planets

423
00:27:36.160 --> 00:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>around stars like the Sun as they enter old age,

424
00:27:39.400 --> 00:27:43.640
<v Speaker 1>notes co author Jesus Twala. By studying these systems, astronomers

425
00:27:43.640 --> 00:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>gain valuable insights into the long term fate of our

426
00:27:46.480 --> 00:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>own Solar system. When our Sun eventually exhausts its nuclear

427
00:27:50.680 --> 00:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>fuel billions of years from now, it will expand into

428
00:27:53.759 --> 00:27:57.039
<v Speaker 1>a red giant before shedding its outer layers and becoming

429
00:27:57.079 --> 00:28:01.599
<v Speaker 1>a white dwarf. During this tumultuous transit, the inner planets

430
00:28:01.599 --> 00:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>will likely be engulfed, while the orbits of surviving outer

431
00:28:04.799 --> 00:28:09.160
<v Speaker 1>planets may become destabilized. What we're witnessing in the Helix

432
00:28:09.200 --> 00:28:13.279
<v Speaker 1>nebula could be a preview of Earth's ultimate fate, offering

433
00:28:13.359 --> 00:28:17.279
<v Speaker 1>both a sobering reminder of cosmic mortality and a fascinating

434
00:28:17.279 --> 00:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>glimpse into the life cycle of planetary systems, and one

435
00:28:21.759 --> 00:28:26.279
<v Speaker 1>more discovery for good measure. For over a century, astronomers

436
00:28:26.319 --> 00:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>have been captivated by the majestic spiral arms that wind

437
00:28:29.440 --> 00:28:33.400
<v Speaker 1>through galaxies like our own Milky Way, but recent observations

438
00:28:33.720 --> 00:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>using the unprecedented resolution of the Hubble and James Webb's

439
00:28:36.960 --> 00:28:41.039
<v Speaker 1>Space telescopes have revealed something even more fascinating. These grand

440
00:28:41.079 --> 00:28:44.359
<v Speaker 1>spiral structures aren't just simple arms, but are decorated with

441
00:28:44.440 --> 00:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>intricate features astronomers called feathers. These feathery structures extend just

442
00:28:49.440 --> 00:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a few thousand light years, relatively small by galactic standards,

443
00:28:53.559 --> 00:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>but they play an outsized role in galactic evolution. Unlike

444
00:28:57.680 --> 00:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the broader spiral arms they branch from, these feathers are

445
00:29:01.039 --> 00:29:04.799
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily dense regions, packed with gas and dust. They serve

446
00:29:04.839 --> 00:29:07.759
<v Speaker 1>as cosmic nurseries where much of a galaxy star formation

447
00:29:07.880 --> 00:29:11.559
<v Speaker 1>takes place, hosting young star clusters and massive clouds of

448
00:29:11.599 --> 00:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>neutral hydrogen where new stars are born. Initially, astronomers believe

449
00:29:16.279 --> 00:29:22.279
<v Speaker 1>these feathers were exclusive to the largest Grand design spiral galaxies. However,

450
00:29:22.440 --> 00:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>mounting evidence suggests their nearly universal features, with our own

451
00:29:26.519 --> 00:29:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Milky Way sporting these delicate structures as well. What is

452
00:29:30.359 --> 00:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>puzzled scientists for years is how these complex features form.

453
00:29:34.200 --> 00:29:38.799
<v Speaker 1>The leading theories have involved elaborate mechanisms, perhaps powerful supernova

454
00:29:38.920 --> 00:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>explosions sculpting the gas within spiral arms or vast magnetic fields,

455
00:29:44.279 --> 00:29:48.599
<v Speaker 1>twisting and compressing matter into these filamentary patterns. The complexity

456
00:29:48.640 --> 00:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of feathers seem to demand equally complex formation processes, but

457
00:29:52.799 --> 00:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the most elegant explanation is also the simplest. In

458
00:29:56.759 --> 00:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>research recently accepted for publication in Astronomy and astrophis Physics,

459
00:30:00.839 --> 00:30:05.119
<v Speaker 1>a team of astronomers proposed a surprisingly straightforward mechanism gravity

460
00:30:05.160 --> 00:30:09.279
<v Speaker 1>alone might create these feathers. To test this hypothesis, the

461
00:30:09.359 --> 00:30:13.759
<v Speaker 1>researchers designed an elegantly simple computer simulation. They created a

462
00:30:13.799 --> 00:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>basic model of a rotating disc of gas. No stars,

463
00:30:17.359 --> 00:30:20.799
<v Speaker 1>no complex physics, just gas moving under the influence of

464
00:30:20.839 --> 00:30:25.039
<v Speaker 1>its own gravity. When they ran the simulation, something remarkable happened.

465
00:30:25.519 --> 00:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>The gas naturally fragmented into a series of nested filaments

466
00:30:29.200 --> 00:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that bore a striking resemblance to the feathers observed in

467
00:30:31.960 --> 00:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>real galaxies. The key insight is that these gas discs

468
00:30:35.920 --> 00:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>are inherently unstable. Even tiny initial clumps tend to collapse

469
00:30:40.519 --> 00:30:43.519
<v Speaker 1>under their own gravity, and when combined with the rotation

470
00:30:43.640 --> 00:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of the disc, these collapsing regions naturally form elongated structures

471
00:30:48.680 --> 00:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the feathers we observe in spiral galaxies. When researchers compared

472
00:30:53.039 --> 00:30:57.359
<v Speaker 1>the simulated feathers with actual observations. They found broad agreement

473
00:30:57.480 --> 00:31:01.359
<v Speaker 1>in size, shape, and density. This doesn't mean the mystery

474
00:31:01.400 --> 00:31:05.839
<v Speaker 1>is completely solved. The simulated galaxies were deliberately simplified, lacking

475
00:31:05.880 --> 00:31:09.279
<v Speaker 1>many elements we know exist in real galaxies. The next

476
00:31:09.319 --> 00:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>step is to introduce more realistic physics. Those supernovas and

477
00:31:13.039 --> 00:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>magnetic fields do exist and certainly influence galactic evolution. The

478
00:31:17.319 --> 00:31:20.599
<v Speaker 1>question is whether they would disrupt these gravitationally formed feathers,

479
00:31:20.720 --> 00:31:24.319
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps enhance them. What makes this finding so compelling

480
00:31:24.400 --> 00:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is that it demonstrates how nature can use basic physical

481
00:31:27.400 --> 00:31:31.559
<v Speaker 1>principles to generate remarkably complex structures, even at the vast

482
00:31:31.559 --> 00:31:36.079
<v Speaker 1>scales of galaxies. Sometimes the universe's most intricate patterns emerge

483
00:31:36.079 --> 00:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>from its simplest rules. The team's simulations were remarkably simplistic

484
00:31:40.240 --> 00:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>by design. Rather than creating a complex model incorporating all

485
00:31:44.519 --> 00:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the known physics of galaxies, they stripped everything back to

486
00:31:47.920 --> 00:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the most basic elements. Just a disk of gas rotating

487
00:31:51.279 --> 00:31:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and evolving under its own gravitational influence. No stars, no

488
00:31:55.480 --> 00:31:59.759
<v Speaker 1>explosive stellar feedback, no magnetic fields, just gravity. When they

489
00:31:59.759 --> 00:32:03.359
<v Speaker 1>set this simplified system in motion, the results were striking.

490
00:32:04.000 --> 00:32:07.839
<v Speaker 1>The rotating gas disc didn't remain smooth and uniform. Instead,

491
00:32:07.880 --> 00:32:11.039
<v Speaker 1>it naturally began to fragment, breaking down into a series

492
00:32:11.119 --> 00:32:15.039
<v Speaker 1>of nested, elongated filaments that closely resembled the feathery structures

493
00:32:15.039 --> 00:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>astronomers observe in real galaxies. This fragmentation occurs because gaseous

494
00:32:20.240 --> 00:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>discs are inherently gravitationally unstable. Any slight density fluctuation, no

495
00:32:25.920 --> 00:32:29.799
<v Speaker 1>matter how small, initially tends to attract more matter to itself.

496
00:32:30.559 --> 00:32:34.319
<v Speaker 1>As these regions grow denser, they collapse faster, creating a

497
00:32:34.359 --> 00:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>self reinforcing process. The rotation of the disc then stretches

498
00:32:39.480 --> 00:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>these collapsing regions into the filamentary patterns we recognize as feathers.

499
00:32:44.720 --> 00:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>What's particularly impressive is how well these simulated structures matched

500
00:32:48.759 --> 00:32:53.759
<v Speaker 1>actual observations. When the researchers compared their computer generated feathers

501
00:32:53.759 --> 00:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>with those seen in real spiral galaxies, they found significant

502
00:32:57.960 --> 00:33:02.119
<v Speaker 1>similarities in key properties like sie shape and density distributions.

503
00:33:02.599 --> 00:33:06.279
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't mean we've solved the entire puzzle. The researchers

504
00:33:06.319 --> 00:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that real galaxies are far more complex environments. The

505
00:33:10.720 --> 00:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>next challenge is determining whether introducing more realistic elements like

506
00:33:15.759 --> 00:33:19.839
<v Speaker 1>stellar feedback from supernovas or the influence of magnetic fields

507
00:33:20.440 --> 00:33:24.759
<v Speaker 1>would disrupt these gravitationally formed feathers, or perhaps work in

508
00:33:24.799 --> 00:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>concert with gravity to shape them further. The finding highlights

509
00:33:28.920 --> 00:33:33.039
<v Speaker 1>a principle that appears repeatedly across cosmic scales, that immense

510
00:33:33.079 --> 00:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>complexity often emerges from relatively simple underlying physics. From the

511
00:33:37.720 --> 00:33:41.519
<v Speaker 1>intricate patterns of snowflakes forming from simple water molecules to

512
00:33:41.599 --> 00:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the vast, filamentary cosmic webs stretching across the universe, Nature

513
00:33:46.240 --> 00:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>frequently uses basic rules to create stunning complexity. In the

514
00:33:50.240 --> 00:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>case of galactic feathers, it seems that gravity alone might

515
00:33:53.240 --> 00:33:56.759
<v Speaker 1>be sufficient to establish the foundation of these structures. It's

516
00:33:56.759 --> 00:34:00.839
<v Speaker 1>a powerful reminder that sometimes the most elegant explanations in

517
00:34:00.880 --> 00:34:05.359
<v Speaker 1>science are also the simplest, and that brings us to

518
00:34:05.359 --> 00:34:08.519
<v Speaker 1>the end of today's episode of Astronomy Daily. From the

519
00:34:08.559 --> 00:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>evolving mystery of dark energy to Boeing starliner troubles, China's

520
00:34:12.920 --> 00:34:18.079
<v Speaker 1>ambitious space plans, puzzling exoplanets, a star devouring its own planet,

521
00:34:18.519 --> 00:34:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and the simple gravitational forces behind complex galactic structures, we've

522
00:34:23.320 --> 00:34:27.760
<v Speaker 1>covered quite the cosmic journey together. I'm anna, and it's

523
00:34:27.800 --> 00:34:31.280
<v Speaker 1>been my pleasure guiding you through these fascinating developments in

524
00:34:31.360 --> 00:34:36.599
<v Speaker 1>astronomy and space exploration. The universe continues to surprise us,

525
00:34:37.199 --> 00:34:40.800
<v Speaker 1>whether it's throwing curveballs at our understanding of fundamental forces

526
00:34:41.360 --> 00:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>or revealing the elegant simplicity behind seemingly complex cosmic patterns.

527
00:34:47.480 --> 00:34:50.280
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoyed today's show, please visit our website at

528
00:34:50.360 --> 00:34:53.599
<v Speaker 1>Astronomydaily dot io, where you can sign up for our

529
00:34:53.599 --> 00:34:56.519
<v Speaker 1>free daily newsletter, catch up on all the latest space

530
00:34:56.559 --> 00:34:59.679
<v Speaker 1>and astronomy news with our constantly updating news feed, and

531
00:34:59.719 --> 00:35:02.880
<v Speaker 1>listen into all our back episodes. You can also find

532
00:35:02.960 --> 00:35:06.280
<v Speaker 1>us on social media. Just search for astro Daily Pod

533
00:35:06.360 --> 00:35:11.639
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, x YouTube, YouTube, music, TikTok, and Instagram. We

534
00:35:11.800 --> 00:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>love hearing from fellow space enthusiasts, so don't hesitate to

535
00:35:15.039 --> 00:35:18.239
<v Speaker 1>reach out and share your thoughts. Until next time, keep

536
00:35:18.280 --> 00:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>looking up and stay curious about the wonders of our universe.

537
00:35:21.320 --> 00:35:25.079
<v Speaker 1>This has been Astronomy Daily and I'm anna signing offday

538
00:35:27.000 --> 00:35:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Startz Starz
