Speaker 1: This is Dan Capless and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of the Dan Capless Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform.
Speaker 2: Not quite and not yet, buddy, we'll be here soon,
Speaker 2: Dan Kapless out there fighting the good fight on behalf
Speaker 2: of a client one a little long and that endeavor
Speaker 2: so yours truly, Ryan Schuling continuing with the Dan Capless
Speaker 2: pregame Show, which you can listen to weekdays between two
Speaker 2: and four pm.
Speaker 3: I jest, but only slightly. You can air live here in.
Speaker 2: Denver, Colorado on six point thirty KL locally, but for
Speaker 2: those of you who are in Fort Collins or Pueblo,
Speaker 2: any points in between, or border to border between Wyoming
Speaker 2: and New Mexico, you can catch me on the podcast
Speaker 2: or listen live via the iHeart at Ryan Shuling Live.
Speaker 2: Would appreciate your patronage and always your support. So we
Speaker 2: start today with some real sheer panic from the anti
Speaker 2: Trump left, the never Trump right, and the numbers that
Speaker 2: came in the job numbers the report for not only August,
Speaker 2: but July and before that, June revised downward shows a
Speaker 2: slowing economy. Also, news out of both Michigan and North
Speaker 2: Carolina that RFK Junior will in fact be removed from
Speaker 2: the ballots in those two swing states, despite the best
Speaker 2: slash worst efforts of Democrats in power in each of
Speaker 2: those states. So when we're looking at now less than
Speaker 2: two months until the election on November fifth, here we
Speaker 2: stand on September sixth.
Speaker 3: You just listen to the media.
Speaker 2: Just hear where they're going, Hear how extreme and frenetic
Speaker 2: they get, and you'll know what the state of this
Speaker 2: race is. First of all, a guy that I normally
Speaker 2: view is kind of down the middle, I think he's
Speaker 2: ostensibly a conservative on CNN by that measure, I think
Speaker 2: Scott Jennings is the only one true to form there.
Speaker 2: But Michael schmer Khanish with this analysis of oh punk
Speaker 2: the breaks on election night, if you see Trump winning.
Speaker 4: It becomes incumbent upon all of us in the media,
Speaker 4: those of us with platforms to educate the public about
Speaker 4: the fact that if there's not a decisive outcome that night,
Speaker 4: it doesn't mean that there's been shenanigans involved.
Speaker 3: We remember the Red Mirage and the.
Speaker 4: Blue wave right because so many were Democrats were voting
Speaker 4: by absentee ballot in that twenty twenty cycle when many
Speaker 4: of us tried to educate people, don't go looking at
Speaker 4: the initial returns as they come in that Tuesday night
Speaker 4: and think that's the victor, because this thing is going
Speaker 4: to have to play itself out.
Speaker 3: They're gonna have to play itself out.
Speaker 2: We got to wait for these mail in ballots to
Speaker 2: come in and be counted, and if they have an
Speaker 2: incorrect date on them, they can still be counted. Now
Speaker 2: in Pennsylvania, that's pending an appeal. But this is what
Speaker 2: you get when you have election season, as Michael Brown
Speaker 2: puts it here locally, rather than election day. And if
Speaker 2: we have one day, then neither side knows how many
Speaker 2: votes it needs to make up the difference based on
Speaker 2: the ballots.
Speaker 3: That are out to try to account for that.
Speaker 2: So it doesn't open the door to Shenanigan's as long
Speaker 2: as you have a targeted, focused election day. Smerconish, though,
Speaker 2: wants to open that door even more ridiculous.
Speaker 3: Here's Stephanie Rule.
Speaker 2: She has just really been out of shape about the
Speaker 2: double standard and media coverage.
Speaker 3: Not in Harris's favor, but in Trump's favor? Are you
Speaker 3: kidding me?
Speaker 5: Ki didn't utter a single coherent sentence. Many of the
Speaker 5: things he said there weren't even verbs in his sentences.
Speaker 5: It was Marco Rubio, my daughter at Vanka childcare? Is
Speaker 5: childcare right? And the fact that we're not covering that, like,
Speaker 5: let's be clear, day in and day out, we're saying,
Speaker 5: I need to see every single one of Kamala Harris's policies,
Speaker 5: and I want to see every punctuation, and I want
Speaker 5: to see it listed in fifteen right, fons, there's an
Speaker 5: absolute double standard in the way these two individuals are being.
Speaker 2: Covered, Sephaniel, I'll make a deal with you. How about
Speaker 2: a policy? How about a policy? How about one policy?
Speaker 2: Anywhere on her website? Go to her website right now,
Speaker 2: and all you will see is a straight up grift
Speaker 2: handouts for money, hands out for money? How could I donate?
Speaker 2: Where does my donation go? Frequently ask questions nothing about policy?
Speaker 2: Are you kidding me? Well, here's some policy from Chris
Speaker 2: Saliza CNN. He posts on X Kamala Harris has changed
Speaker 2: positions on a whole lot of things, But has she
Speaker 2: really changed? Has she abandoned her true leftist roots of
Speaker 2: San Francisco, California.
Speaker 3: I would argue she has not.
Speaker 2: She's just trying to lie as best as she can
Speaker 2: to try to appear to move to the middle because
Speaker 2: she knows she doesn't have the sheer numbers of votes
Speaker 2: to win in a general election. When she was running
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty, she was flanked to the left of
Speaker 2: Warren and Sanders trying to win a primary, but she
Speaker 2: went so far left there's no reconciling these. A lot
Speaker 2: of these were in town hall. Remember her minding to
Speaker 2: ban plastic straws, and she even talked about how clumsy
Speaker 2: paper straws were in that they collapse and they disintegrate.
Speaker 2: She's no longer four it according to Axios point two,
Speaker 2: a mandate for automakers to only make electric and hydrogen
Speaker 2: vehicles by twenty thirty five. It's only eleven years away.
Speaker 2: There can't be any real path to that. The Harris
Speaker 2: campaign won't say whether she's still four at point three,
Speaker 2: a big one banning fracking because of concerns over global
Speaker 2: warming and potential water contamination. Now she says she no
Speaker 2: longer favors a band unfracking a mandatory buyback program for
Speaker 2: assault weapons is part of her gun safety agenda. She's
Speaker 2: dropped this idea, according to Crystaliza. Point five decriminalizing crossing
Speaker 2: the border from a criminal offense to a civil one.
Speaker 2: Remember she raised her hand on the debate stage along
Speaker 2: with several others. According to her campaign, she no longer
Speaker 2: supports this. We're not done reparations for slavery, which many
Speaker 2: progressives have argued for. During the twenty twenty primary, she
Speaker 2: was all on board with that when on several radio
Speaker 2: shows and podcasts saying exactly that. Now we're not clear
Speaker 2: whether she's in favor of reparations for slavery and how
Speaker 2: that would be handled. Your guess is as good as mine.
Speaker 2: Point seven. Building a wall on the Southwest border a
Speaker 2: defining Trump promise that many Democrats have fought, and now
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris appears to have accepted it as part of
Speaker 2: the bipartisan border package that she claims Republicans killed. And
Speaker 2: yet she features Donald Trump's border wall in one of
Speaker 2: her television ads. Keep Going point eight a federal jobs guarantee.
Speaker 2: It was part of her New Green Deal proposal. Now
Speaker 2: she's no longer for that and then point nine Medicare
Speaker 2: for All. This is a bill that she co sponsored
Speaker 2: with Bernie Sanders. She thanked him on stage during a
Speaker 2: live debate for conceptualizing the idea of medicare for all.
Speaker 3: Now she's backing off.
Speaker 2: Of this, and I look at this from two Dan
Speaker 2: thinks the Libs are in the tank for and she
Speaker 2: can take them for granted and lie to them all
Speaker 2: she wants. They know that she's not for real in
Speaker 2: changing these positions, so it must be all about fooling
Speaker 2: the people in the middle, the moderates, the undecideds, the independents,
Speaker 2: the unaffiliated. Will they be duped enough to believe that
Speaker 2: that's just nine policy point positions that apparently she's either
Speaker 2: waffled on or completely contradicted. But who do you believe
Speaker 2: and when do you believe where she stands on these issues.
Speaker 2: She has yet to really flesh these out. They are
Speaker 2: not on her website. So Stephanie Rule, you're very frustrated.
Speaker 2: I can tell you're really upset. But you need look
Speaker 2: no further than Kamala Harris and her campaign itself, because
Speaker 2: they know they can't come out and stake those positions
Speaker 2: so far to the left on every one of those
Speaker 2: issues I just outlined, and when they are unwinnable positions
Speaker 2: on policy.
Speaker 5: And for anyone else who is saying Kamala Harris is
Speaker 5: far more progressive than Joe Biden, she's not. Look at
Speaker 5: the number she just put out this week about long
Speaker 5: term capital.
Speaker 3: Dan staffs.
Speaker 5: What Kamala Harris is guilty of is being.
Speaker 6: A black woman.
Speaker 5: And for someone who's not actually paying attention to economic policy,
Speaker 5: they're saying she must be more progressive. She's not.
Speaker 2: Are we really going to play this game on race
Speaker 2: and gender that's so tired and so played out? And
Speaker 2: to the point that rule makes here, what's wrong with
Speaker 2: being progressive? You see candidates run on conservative principles and win.
Speaker 2: They don't vacillate moderate abandoned positions that they hold, like
Speaker 2: being pro life. Jade Vance, he's a very conservative guy.
Speaker 2: He's proudly conservative. Why is Kamala Harris not then therefore
Speaker 2: proudly progressive? So, yeah, this is the vision I have
Speaker 2: for the country. It's progressive, it's leftist, but I believe
Speaker 2: it will work because I'm principled and I want to
Speaker 2: see this plan through. Why is it the media is
Speaker 2: panicking about Harris being labeled as a progressive.
Speaker 3: What is wrong with being progressive?
Speaker 5: And to the business community that's saying we're aokay with Trump.
Speaker 5: I would just love to sit down with them. I'd
Speaker 5: love to know who was in that room yesterday. I mean,
Speaker 5: in the last week, we're hearing names like Howard Lutnick,
Speaker 5: who's the CEO of Canter Fitzgerald, who is now on
Speaker 5: Donald Trump's transition team, right self made billionaire, extraordinarily successful person.
Speaker 3: I'd love to know what.
Speaker 5: Policies is, how we're down with or is it just, oh,
Speaker 5: we're done with the wokeness Lena Kahn. She's anti business.
Speaker 5: But they're never getting into detail. And the reason we
Speaker 5: should be concerned is that this is the United States
Speaker 5: recreating itself with oligarchs. Because oligarch's in Russia. They know
Speaker 5: there are scores of people living in Squalor, but it
Speaker 5: doesn't matter because they've got an inside track to Vladimir
Speaker 5: Putin and they're rich as rich can be.
Speaker 2: Notice that Stephanie Rule is perfectly fine with oligarchs so
Speaker 2: long as they support the policy and the position of
Speaker 2: her preferred candidate, Kamala Harris. I'll name you a few,
Speaker 2: Mark Zuckerberg you can consider him an oligark, Jeff Bezos,
Speaker 2: Bill Gates, just to name three. She doesn't seem to
Speaker 2: have a problem with those oligarchs supporting Kamala Harris or
Speaker 2: Joe Biden the last time around, when most of Wall
Speaker 2: Street and most of big Tech was all in on
Speaker 2: Joe Biden. Funny, it only becomes an issue now for
Speaker 2: Stephanie Rule that a lot of these big movers and
Speaker 2: shakers are flipping their position to Trump because they know
Speaker 2: that Kamala Harris and her anti business policies are going
Speaker 2: to wreck the American economy.
Speaker 3: Stephanie Rule, she's a little out of control.
Speaker 2: She's very upset, and that is a marker of where
Speaker 2: this election stands.
Speaker 3: Make no mistake about it. A time out, We're back.
Speaker 2: Will Dan Caplis return or will you be stuck with
Speaker 2: me for another segment? Tune in and find out after
Speaker 2: this you're listening to the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 3: And now back to the Dan Capliss Show podcast.
Speaker 7: The number of CEOs who were at the meeting who
Speaker 7: originally said to me that he was managering coherent, not
Speaker 7: that they changed their mind, but and this maybe goes
Speaker 7: to the bullying.
Speaker 8: Piece of it and the sort of autocratic piece of it.
Speaker 3: I started to get calls.
Speaker 7: From other people in the room afterwards, you know, saying,
Speaker 7: oh my goodness, Andrew, No, no, no, you don't understand.
Speaker 3: He wasn't in coherent, and.
Speaker 7: They saw it, but they were being told that they
Speaker 7: didn't see it, and they were being told you got
Speaker 7: to get the message out. And I think that there's
Speaker 7: an argument to be made that the Republicans and the
Speaker 7: Trump machine has become very good at trying to bully
Speaker 7: people into submission.
Speaker 3: To some degree, the frustration is palpable. You can taste it.
Speaker 2: Ryan schuling back with you as the Dan Campalis pregame
Speaker 2: show continues extended version here all along the networks, Dan
Speaker 2: will be back with us, It would appear in our
Speaker 2: next segment. But that was Andrew Ross sorkin CNBC saying
Speaker 2: that CEOs know that Donald Trump coherent, but he's using
Speaker 2: autocratic tactics and he's bullying them. My question, then again,
Speaker 2: is why didn't that work. In twenty twenty, all of
Speaker 2: these CEOs, big money, big Wall Street companies all across
Speaker 2: the country switched their allegiance and their alliance to Joe Biden,
Speaker 2: Chamber of Commerce types, the Mitt Romney types, the never
Speaker 2: Trump kind. They went over to support Joe Biden. So
Speaker 2: why all of a sudden would autocratic tactics in bullying
Speaker 2: now be working for Team Trump? How did just magically happen?
Speaker 2: And I mentioned the names Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates,
Speaker 2: big money on the left, oligarchs as you might put it,
Speaker 2: Mark Zuckerberg, that supported Biden the last time around, Kelly,
Speaker 2: you added another one and that person still supporting Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris this time.
Speaker 6: Around he is Mark Cuban.
Speaker 2: How about Mark Cuban as a CEO of the dot
Speaker 2: com bubble that bursts and he is on the right.
Speaker 3: Side of that one. He's an a lagark.
Speaker 2: I mean, if you're gonna play this game, it doesn't
Speaker 2: make any sense other than a lot of these CEOs
Speaker 2: have come to their senses realizing bid nomics is a failure.
Speaker 2: With this latest jobs report that just came out, the
Speaker 2: media is reeling. They don't know how to defend or
Speaker 2: prop up Kamala Harris effectively.
Speaker 3: They see the storm.
Speaker 2: On the horizon that is September tenth, and this debate
Speaker 2: on Tuesday Night that ABC is holding that I believe
Speaker 2: will spell doom for Kamala Harris as a candidate and
Speaker 2: for her campaign.
Speaker 3: There's no hiding, there are no notes.
Speaker 2: She won't have a table to hide behind and squat
Speaker 2: behind and slouch and slump down behind.
Speaker 3: Should have to stand at a podium.
Speaker 2: The mics will be muted between the two candidates. So
Speaker 2: the Democrats reaping what they have sown. They wanted to
Speaker 2: stick out all these rules to limit and constrict Trump
Speaker 2: against Joe Biden, and now they wanted to undo them
Speaker 2: for Kamala Harris because they realize it doesn't work in
Speaker 2: her favor.
Speaker 3: But they're stuck with them. And that's how it's going
Speaker 3: to play out.
Speaker 2: When Willie Geist MSNBC Morning Joe, we're show on television,
Speaker 2: maybe aside from the view, that's a oh that's.
Speaker 3: A toss up. Yeah, that's a tough one.
Speaker 2: It might need to get some listener input on those
Speaker 2: five seven, seven, three nine. Start those texts, Dan, but
Speaker 2: you know you've got them. Check made it on the chessboard.
Speaker 2: When the best defense they have against attacks coming Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris's way is but Trump.
Speaker 9: Remember one of the core arguments about Kamala Harris that
Speaker 9: you hear in certain cable news channels and websites is
Speaker 9: that she's always in the middle of a word salad.
Speaker 9: Do you ever watch Donald Trump? You may want to
Speaker 9: give up on that argument. Do you ever watch his rallies?
Speaker 9: Did you watch him yesterday? Had absolutely no clue what
Speaker 9: he was talking about.
Speaker 2: That's not a defense of Kamala Harris. That's not saying
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris doesn't execute word salads like we just played
Speaker 2: at the close of my show in my Deep Thoughts
Speaker 2: segment where she went on and on about this word
Speaker 2: she had just discovered called hypothesis Willie Geish Trump. That
Speaker 2: doesn't work. People know Donald Trump, He's a known quantity.
Speaker 2: His numbers are pretty much burned in. He's got a
Speaker 2: kind of a low ceiling, but he's got a very
Speaker 2: high floor. There's not a lot of variants that's going
Speaker 2: to happen with Donald Trump and his supporters. But if
Speaker 2: the best you have is non Kamala Harris doesn't talk
Speaker 2: in worlds. He just admitted that she does. But Trump
Speaker 2: does it too. Here's another example of Kamala Harris. When
Speaker 2: she's put on the spot, she's granding a radio interview.
Speaker 3: I think to some.
Speaker 2: Small time Hispanic station. Listen very carvy as she talks
Speaker 2: about turning the page while actually turning the page a
Speaker 2: piece of paper.
Speaker 3: That she's referring to in the form of notes.
Speaker 5: It's time to address Hispanic Americans who may be on
Speaker 5: the fence about way to vote on November fifth.
Speaker 7: Listen, I think that it's time to move forward and
Speaker 7: to chart a new way forward, and we need to
Speaker 7: turn the page on this Trump era.
Speaker 5: You know this person who has talked about.
Speaker 2: Listen to that three words in Listen, it's time to
Speaker 2: turn the page. Yeah, that's I picked up where I
Speaker 2: left off there. They didn't put it all on the
Speaker 2: same piece of paper that's right in front of me.
Speaker 3: Here. They are running. They are running scared.
Speaker 2: The lead for Kamala Harris, the poll variations they are
Speaker 2: not wide enough the way that they were. Even Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 2: who ended up losing in twenty sixteen, had a pretty
Speaker 2: significant lead built up by this point two months to
Speaker 2: go until the election, Joe Biden had an even bigger lead,
Speaker 2: and he won by a sliver, a margin that was
Speaker 2: decided by tens of thousands of votes across just a
Speaker 2: handful of states. Her overall lead in the ruling poll
Speaker 2: average for Real Clear Politics has been somewhere in the neighborhood.
Speaker 3: Of one and a half half to two points.
Speaker 2: But that doesn't take an account as well that both
Speaker 2: those polls I mentioned for both Hillary Clinton and Joe
Speaker 2: Biden underestimated Trump's support. So if you figure they've been
Speaker 2: using a lot of the same factors and they're polling
Speaker 2: even though I know they try to adjust on the
Speaker 2: fly and account for that, the history shows that this
Speaker 2: is not going well and not well enough for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: Even Nate Silver and his projections has Trump now increasing
Speaker 2: his percentages of winning. That's based on both polling models,
Speaker 2: history like I just cited, and trend lines, other factors
Speaker 2: that are involved in chasing votes, et cetera.
Speaker 3: And how that will play out in the swing states.
Speaker 2: He's currently last time I checked, and may have changed,
Speaker 2: but I believe it's Trump right now at a fifty
Speaker 2: eight percent chance of winning the election and Kamala Harris
Speaker 2: at just forty two. So you look at pivot points
Speaker 2: that are left on the calendar for Harris between now
Speaker 2: and November five. The biggest one and maybe the only
Speaker 2: important one left it's September tenth in that debate, and
Speaker 2: I refuse to consider any kind of analysis that doesn't
Speaker 2: take into account that Harris has to dominate that debate
Speaker 2: in a way that she's never done before in order
Speaker 2: to turn the tide of this election in her favor.
Speaker 2: Dan Caplas returns after this This is the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 3: You're listening to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast.
Speaker 6: I've got to ask before I play this bump, why
Speaker 6: that song? Why here?
Speaker 2: Because you're back and now we're living the highlight again,
Speaker 2: we're plumbing it with me filling in there for two secments.
Speaker 6: I just I couldn't figure out where you were going
Speaker 6: with that. I love the song of all Yeah me
Speaker 6: too song, but no, And thank you to Ryan for.
Speaker 1: Starting the show today. And just a quick twenty second thought,
Speaker 1: young lawyers out there, are people thinking about going into law,
Speaker 1: the type of law you want to go into, I
Speaker 1: would just seriously urge you to consider to consider going
Speaker 1: into injury law, because I've got to tell you, man,
Speaker 1: it is I've been doing it forty years now and
Speaker 1: it's just the greatest feeling in the world. The reason
Speaker 1: I was late is we were just blessed to very
Speaker 1: successfully wrap a case up for wonderful clients badly injured
Speaker 1: by a semi And it's just the greatest feeling in
Speaker 1: the world when when you know it all works out
Speaker 1: and then these good people have the things they need
Speaker 1: to have the best life they can have moving forward.
Speaker 6: It's just one of the greatest feelings in the world.
Speaker 1: And I'm sure there are other kinds of law where
Speaker 1: people end up with real good feelings too, but it's
Speaker 1: hard to imagine much better feelings than these. So anyway,
Speaker 1: on with the fight. Eight five to five hours are
Speaker 1: A five eight two five five the number text d
Speaker 1: A N five seven seven through nine. But thank you
Speaker 1: for that coincidental song. It's yeah, just always been one
Speaker 1: of the favorites. Here's the bump I was going to
Speaker 1: play coming out of the break and it ties into
Speaker 1: some news that's now being trumpeted around CNN and elsewhere,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, CNN, what have you done? A one
Speaker 1: to eighty because like, I really want Donald Trump to
Speaker 1: win the election, and I thought you really wanted him
Speaker 1: to lose, and now it's two days in a row
Speaker 1: you're doing things that help him.
Speaker 6: So what's up there? But here's the prelude to that.
Speaker 8: Listen, Jick Chenney, your father a beloved figure among Democrats
Speaker 8: for many, many years.
Speaker 3: Do you if you know who he.
Speaker 8: Will be supporting or who he'll be voting for? Do
Speaker 8: you care to share with us who he might be
Speaker 8: voting for?
Speaker 6: Dick Chenney will be voting for?
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: Is that like the greatest thing ever reppened to Trump?
Speaker 1: And you know that's what's CNN right now. It's just
Speaker 1: blasting this headline. Obviously they're thinking that they're blunting all
Speaker 1: of this other good news for Trump right today, the
Speaker 1: sentencing being put off, And first of all, Trump never
Speaker 1: should have been charged in that case, let alone convicted,
Speaker 1: God forbid sentenced.
Speaker 6: So but at least the sentencing now is being put
Speaker 6: off until after election day.
Speaker 1: First of all, my own personal belief is that they
Speaker 1: probably figured it was going to help Trump if they
Speaker 1: went ahead and sentenced him, and I think it would
Speaker 1: have helped him politically, But it's safer this way for
Speaker 1: him politically and erase, he is trending to win right now,
Speaker 1: no guarantees, but trending to win. It's safer to have
Speaker 1: that sentencing put off. You just take a wild carrot
Speaker 1: out of the mix, and there never should be a sentence.
Speaker 2: But you made such a good point there, Dan, I
Speaker 2: want you to follow up on this about the bias
Speaker 2: of the media and how desperate they are, and that
Speaker 2: was kind of the theme of the first two segments.
Speaker 2: You have all this news coming out, the jobs report,
Speaker 2: terrible for Bidenomics over this entire summer, job numbers revised
Speaker 2: down for June and July and then underperforming for August.
Speaker 2: You had RFK Junior successfully being taken off the ballots
Speaker 2: in Michigan, North Carolina. You had the sentencing delay for
Speaker 2: Donald Trump, and they're running I'm talking for the last
Speaker 2: half hour Dan on CNN with Dick Cheney, this washed
Speaker 2: up Darth Vader Neo Khon and rock Wars starting Halliburton
Speaker 2: benefiting endorsement of Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3: That's all they've got, Yeah, Yeah.
Speaker 1: Got to be filling the heat right now when they
Speaker 1: play that card, and it is. I think that's the
Speaker 1: point though. It's all they have right now because think
Speaker 1: about what they're stuck with. We have never seen this,
Speaker 1: and we're very grateful for those Democrats and lefties who
Speaker 1: listen to the show, Thank you for being here, and
Speaker 1: we like the battle of ideas. But we've never seen
Speaker 1: Republican or Democrat ever in our lifetime's a situation like this.
Speaker 6: Look at this.
Speaker 1: They're stuck with a candidate who everybody knows, everybody who's
Speaker 1: going to cast a ballot November knows, didn't get a
Speaker 1: single vote, didn't win a single primary, was installed in
Speaker 1: a backroom deal. But here's a big problem. Their big
Speaker 1: problem is their candidate can't give an interview. So they're
Speaker 1: stuck with that right now. So you've got Trump, who
Speaker 1: is you know, will take on all comers. Trump out
Speaker 1: there every day, Vans out there every day doing interviews.
Speaker 1: Harris can't give an interview. So they're in a real
Speaker 1: bind right now because you can see this thing starting
Speaker 1: to slip away from them. In fact, here's Nate Silver
Speaker 1: and again Nate Silver is a Democrat voting for Harris.
Speaker 1: He said he's voting for Harris. Everybody knows. He comes
Speaker 1: from the left and he's a very prominent polster on
Speaker 1: the left.
Speaker 6: And we've been talking about how.
Speaker 1: His percentage has changed, and it was relatively short time
Speaker 1: ago that it was almost sixty forty in Harris's favor
Speaker 1: and as of this morning, Ryan Jesus was almost sixty
Speaker 1: forty in Trump's favor, a.
Speaker 6: New high for Trump.
Speaker 1: And then as people on the left air shooting at
Speaker 1: silver over this, he posts this today.
Speaker 6: I'd also note.
Speaker 1: That Harris's raw polling averages have declined and he put
Speaker 1: declined in all caps in most swing states since the
Speaker 1: start of the DNC. This data is not subject to
Speaker 1: the convention bounce adjustment. She's had a run of pretty
Speaker 1: mediocre state polling and so that's coming from the left,
Speaker 1: So they see this thing slipping away. And if they
Speaker 1: think a Dick Cheney endorsement of Kamala Harris, or at
Speaker 1: least Dick Cheney saying Trump can never hold power again
Speaker 1: is going to hurt Trump. I'd love to know what
Speaker 1: planet they're living on.
Speaker 2: And she's living on borrowed time politically, Dan, because we
Speaker 2: know she's not going to grant another sit down interview.
Speaker 2: I don't think she'll do a single one on a
Speaker 2: major network between now and November five, So how many
Speaker 2: inflection points are even left for her on the board
Speaker 2: between now and then? The debate on Tuesday might be
Speaker 2: it that might be the only one brother, let.
Speaker 1: Me quib with you here, okay, because here's what I
Speaker 1: see happening. First of all, we start with Tuesday. It's
Speaker 1: all about Tuesday. Now we all know who has won
Speaker 1: on Tuesday. Put one in quotes. The media has I
Speaker 1: mean literally, the headlines have already been written, the graphics
Speaker 1: have already been worked up in the newsrooms. Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: has been declared the winner of Tuesday's event. Can't call
Speaker 1: it a debate. She'll be protected. It's an event. So
Speaker 1: that's going to be what the nation here is starting
Speaker 1: Tuesday night at about nine thirty Mountain time. Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: big win in the debate. And then so we're going
Speaker 1: to have that out there then, Kamala Harris, I don't
Speaker 1: think Ryan, I I don't think there's any doubt. You
Speaker 1: may disagree that she is going to look better and expected.
Speaker 1: She's going to sound better than expected because the comparison
Speaker 1: is going to be to the Biden disaster and to
Speaker 1: some of her own disasters, and she's going to be
Speaker 1: fully protected by ABC. So you're going to have a
Speaker 1: night that's probably going to be a plus for her
Speaker 1: given the low expectations, the protection from ABC in the
Speaker 1: media distorting the event.
Speaker 6: So what impact does that have on the arc of
Speaker 6: the race?
Speaker 1: I think that's the first question, right, And then beyond that,
Speaker 1: is there going to be a second debate? Well, whoever
Speaker 1: comes out the winner of the first debate, and I
Speaker 1: think winner is going to have to be judged by
Speaker 1: the ultimate fallout in the polls, not who actually performs
Speaker 1: better that night. I expect that'll be Trump. It is
Speaker 1: not going to agree to a second debate. She's only
Speaker 1: going to agree to a second debate if she's desperate, right,
Speaker 1: if it's the only chance she has, that's her hal Mary.
Speaker 6: So to your point, Ryan.
Speaker 1: If the art continues and she's going to get a
Speaker 1: little bumped next week because of the way this whole
Speaker 1: thing's going to be distorted, But if the overall art
Speaker 1: continues and it's trending toward a Trump victory, I wouldn't
Speaker 1: be surprised if she does a ton of interviews, really,
Speaker 1: if she changes up the whole plan, because at that point,
Speaker 1: as Trump would say, what the hell do you have
Speaker 1: to lose a lot?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 6: Well, no, if you're trending toward defeat.
Speaker 2: Even more by me, even more because she's like you said, Dan,
Speaker 2: nothing's going to change about the fact that she is
Speaker 2: terrible at interviews one on one. It will only get
Speaker 2: worse for her at that point, she's got to hide
Speaker 2: the ball.
Speaker 3: That's the only way to win.
Speaker 1: Well, my belief is if she's trending toward defeat at
Speaker 1: that point, they will try anything. They might even Ryan,
Speaker 1: they might even put issues on her website. They still
Speaker 1: don't have an issue section on her website. So this again,
Speaker 1: it goes back to what we talked about in January.
Speaker 1: This is going to be one of the most fast
Speaker 1: years of your life. If you care about news and
Speaker 1: politics and the arc of the country and all of that,
Speaker 1: and obviously you do you're here on the show. It's
Speaker 1: it's going to be incredibly interesting between now an election day. Hey,
Speaker 1: we got to hit this hard break. We'll come back
Speaker 1: with hot sound of the day. But let's start with
Speaker 1: this question. Since it's the quote unquote breaking news of
Speaker 1: the afternoon, Dick Cheney supporting Kamala Harris. Is that going
Speaker 1: to hurt or help Trump? And believe me, we have
Speaker 1: a lot more than that to talk about, but that's
Speaker 1: kind of interesting and anxious to get your take on it.
Speaker 6: You're on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 3: And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 7: It is our undocumented immigrants that is the least likely
Speaker 7: to commit.
Speaker 10: From police report as many as seventy five percent of
Speaker 10: the people they've arrested in Midtown Manhattan for assault, robbery,
Speaker 10: and domestic violence.
Speaker 5: Our legal migrants, Alice, have tracked down a killer whose
Speaker 5: crime span the country.
Speaker 1: Rachel Morin was dragged on a hiking trail in Maryland
Speaker 1: where she was raped and murdered.
Speaker 5: Polisse Brandon Ortiz Vta used a handgun he bought illegally
Speaker 5: to shoot Wooby Garcia multiple times on Friday. The prime
Speaker 5: suspect charged in Lincoln Riley's murder was twenty six year
Speaker 5: old Jose Antonio Avara.
Speaker 3: He illegally entered.
Speaker 5: The United States back in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 2: The Texas Grand Jury induided Rafael Govea Romero. He's accused
Speaker 2: of attacking sixteen year old Lizabeth Medina by repeatedly hitting
Speaker 2: her head and stabbing her.
Speaker 5: Let's gets together about.
Speaker 10: What we're talking about.
Speaker 1: See that's such a powerful spot for many reasons, right,
Speaker 1: But you start with I'm sorry at the beginning of
Speaker 1: this Kamala Harris's behavior, and we've seen it over and
Speaker 1: over and over again. There's just something really wrong there.
Speaker 1: And what do you think that wrong?
Speaker 3: Is it is our undocumented immigrants that is the.
Speaker 10: Least likely to.
Speaker 6: Police report.
Speaker 1: Seriously, let's step back from red blue heat for a second.
Speaker 1: What would cause a person to do that? When talking
Speaker 1: about that, I mean that there's something really off there.
Speaker 1: Is it some kind of impairment. Is it some kind
Speaker 1: of substance thing, Is it some kind of medication thing.
Speaker 1: Is it some kind of personality issue? But there's something
Speaker 1: really wrong And we've seen this over and over again
Speaker 1: from her. But what's interesting, Ryan is now that they've
Speaker 1: told her to stop it. Have we seen any of
Speaker 1: it since she was installed.
Speaker 3: Here and there? But you can tell it's harnessed.
Speaker 2: And this example for this to ad this is one
Speaker 2: that really stands out to me because she's almost looking
Speaker 2: like she's trying to hold it back, but she just
Speaker 2: can't help it, and she's got to let this laughter out.
Speaker 2: There's a nervousness there, I think again, you know dime
Speaker 2: store analysis, but you know she's got some kind of
Speaker 2: social anxiety that she feels by laughing she can disarm
Speaker 2: whoever she's speaking with, that could be an audience, that
Speaker 2: could be an interviewer. You saw her do this in
Speaker 2: the sit down with Lester hold about the border, where
Speaker 2: she started kind of laughing when Lester said, well, you
Speaker 2: haven't been to the border.
Speaker 3: And I haven't been to Europe.
Speaker 6: Right, I read it differently.
Speaker 1: I think it's just weird and uncontrollable at least in
Speaker 1: those situations. But one way or the other it obviously
Speaker 1: hurts her, which is why we don't see her doing
Speaker 1: it right now. But yeah, so anyway, very very effective ad.
Speaker 1: And it comes back to the other great Trump ad
Speaker 1: we urge yesterday, which is the debate everybody's been waiting
Speaker 1: for Harris and the picture on the left versus Harris,
Speaker 1: and then the picture on the right with her different positions,
Speaker 1: the one she truly holds, the radical left positions, and
Speaker 1: then the new positions, the new lies she's trying to
Speaker 1: sell everybody.
Speaker 6: So I expect we'll see that them bunch on Tuesday night.
Speaker 1: Let's see Dick Cheney now endorsing Kamala Harris. What do
Speaker 1: you think the impact there will be? Dan dick Cheney
Speaker 1: can tell his daughter whatever he wants to who he's
Speaker 1: going to vote for. That doesn't necessarily mean he's telling
Speaker 1: the truth. Listen that the Cheney thing, I don't see
Speaker 1: any way it does anything other than help Donald Trump.
Speaker 6: You know, in terms of what.
Speaker 1: You're gonna have Republicans now who don't vote for Trump
Speaker 1: because Dick Cheney doesn't like him, I don't see that happening.
Speaker 1: I mean Republicans who are going to do such an
Speaker 1: extreme thing. And every Republican who doesn't vote for Trump
Speaker 1: is obviously supporting Harris. Right, they're taking a vote away
Speaker 1: from Trump, which helps Harris. But they've crossed that bridge
Speaker 1: a long time ago. So Dick Cheney was so profoundly
Speaker 1: unpopular in so many different circles. I don't see how
Speaker 1: this hurts Trump or helps Harris. We will find out together.
Speaker 1: The other thing is a contrast. Now, this is up
Speaker 1: to President Trump, right, This is up to him on
Speaker 1: Tuesday night, and it should be the easiest job in
Speaker 1: the world because he did so great with it. You
Speaker 1: want peace, vote for me, You want war, vote for them.
Speaker 1: Look at my four years, look at their four years.
Speaker 1: This election is a choice between peace or war. Right,
Speaker 1: and you look at how Cheney. And listen, some things
Speaker 1: Cheney did I liked and commended. But Cheney, you know,
Speaker 1: he was part of batching I Raq and I do
Speaker 1: not believe Saddam should have been left in power. It
Speaker 1: was good to remove him from power, it was good
Speaker 1: for the entire world. But Cheney was part of batching that,
Speaker 1: that entire process. So yeah, it's it's a choice between
Speaker 1: war or peace in this election, and Trump proved it
Speaker 1: in office. He's your best chance at peace. He brought peace,
Speaker 1: peace through strength. So yeah, it'll be interesting to see
Speaker 1: where that hell goes. Dan just shows Cheney's a rhinos.
Speaker 1: That's respectfully, text, You're way too simplistic. What's so disturbing
Speaker 1: to me is so many people I've respected so much
Speaker 1: on the right. I've had on Ara a bunch, and
Speaker 1: Cheney's I haven't had on air. So I'm talking more
Speaker 1: about you know, folks like say Bill Crystal, and there
Speaker 1: have been many others prominent Republicans who have been great
Speaker 1: warriors for causes I believe in, including the life cause.
Speaker 1: But then all of a sudden, you know, Trump insults
Speaker 1: them personally or they get crossways with Trump and they're
Speaker 1: willing to undermine the causes that.
Speaker 6: They say they care so much about.
Speaker 1: Because every one of these people, every one of these
Speaker 1: people who who then goes on to support Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: what they're telling you is they didn't really care about
Speaker 1: those causes because they're now willing to help elect someone
Speaker 1: who is going to do the polar opposite of what
Speaker 1: they've said for all these years they believe in, including
Speaker 1: on the life issue. That to me is the saddest part.
Speaker 1: I thought those people really care deeply about those causes.
Speaker 3: Wow. Dan.
Speaker 1: So now Kamala Harris says Putin and Dick Cheney, all
Speaker 1: she really needs is the Ayatola Ryan, We have not
Speaker 1: had a chance to talk much about that. Putin saying
Speaker 1: that they want Harris to win. What do you make
Speaker 1: of that? What impact does it have in the election?
Speaker 1: The other thing I want to get into when we
Speaker 1: have time, which will probably be after this next break.
Speaker 1: We've touched on it, but Evan had a chance to
Speaker 1: deep dive is you've got this CNN story that kind
Speaker 1: of comes out of nowhere that was very heavily researched,
Speaker 1: A lot of time went into it and absolutely nails
Speaker 1: Harris on her lie on the border, Why did they
Speaker 1: run that story, what do you think their true game is?
Speaker 1: And the latest polling news that should put a smile
Speaker 1: on your face if like me, you want President Trump
Speaker 1: to win eight five four zero five A two five
Speaker 1: five texts d an five seven seven three nine on
Speaker 1: The Dan Kapla Show.