Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show. As the clock
Speaker 1: strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the twentieth of May of Our Lord,
Speaker 1: twenty twenty six. Well, yesterday it was a corruption eruption.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm just staggered, quite frankly, even as someone
Speaker 1: who has followed us closely most of my life, I
Speaker 1: cannot believe the amount of corruption. And the Trump administration
Speaker 1: was an excellent op ed piece by Mona chair And
Speaker 1: who used to be a speechwriter for Ronald Reagan, used
Speaker 1: to have ads on Rush Limbaugh for her, and she's
Speaker 1: talking about how unbelievably corrupt the Trump administration is. I mean,
Speaker 1: this slush fund of one point seven seven six billion dollars,
Speaker 1: and we're going to talk about how that is set up,
Speaker 1: who administers it, and the deal that was put in
Speaker 1: quietly saying the Trump family will not be audited by
Speaker 1: the Irs forever. How about that? And then of course
Speaker 1: the massive election itself incredible display of corruption. As I
Speaker 1: have said before, when you look at the amount of
Speaker 1: money being spent on these elections, it is a metric
Speaker 1: of corruption. There are others will be right back. Yes.
Speaker 1: So the MAGA people are bragging about Trump winning. I
Speaker 1: saw this this morning, Laura, not Lumer. Well, Laura Lumer's
Speaker 1: boasting about stuff as well, but this is Laura Ingram
Speaker 1: and she said, well, the truth is Trump is just
Speaker 1: better at politics than everybody else. It's like, you know,
Speaker 1: you want to call this politics. It's criminal corruption is
Speaker 1: what it is. It's a he's a traitor to this country.
Speaker 1: And I said that. I said, you know, you were
Speaker 1: nothing but a suck up, sickophunt. You know better than this.
Speaker 1: It's about the money. It really is about the money.
Speaker 1: And if the government is for sale, and it is,
Speaker 1: what does that tell us about this government? And he
Speaker 1: has got his fingers in the till, and he is
Speaker 1: filmed his pockets as fast as he can. It is
Speaker 1: a disgusting thing to look at. I am disgusted with
Speaker 1: this country, and I think anybody who looks at it
Speaker 1: carefully and objectively is. So we had a validation yesterday
Speaker 1: of my definition of MAGA. A majority of asinine, gullible
Speaker 1: Americans voted against Thomas Massey, who's had integrity. We don't
Speaker 1: want somebody with integrity in Congress, right, and when you
Speaker 1: look at this. I even have questions about that. We
Speaker 1: look at everything that Biden did, everything that Obama did,
Speaker 1: that we rightfully criticize them for, and what Trump has
Speaker 1: done is to make it his own and to put
Speaker 1: it on steroids to make it far worse. Take a
Speaker 1: look at the election. For example, the vote totals for
Speaker 1: Thomas Massey went up like nineteen percent, but I think
Speaker 1: the overall number of people who voted went up three
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty six percent from the last primary they had. Now,
Speaker 1: do you think that's real. I'll be honest, I don't
Speaker 1: think it's real. And I said before, I said part
Speaker 1: of the game that they're playing with this massive dump
Speaker 1: in the last week of several million dollars, as well
Speaker 1: as all, oh, look, he's doing threesomes with these Democrat women,
Speaker 1: and he's got a girlfriend that he tried to pay
Speaker 1: off because she didn't want to settle a lawsuit with
Speaker 1: the other a different congressional office, and all this other.
Speaker 1: It's just absolute nonsense, especially when you look at the
Speaker 1: timeline of what she claims happens. None of that made
Speaker 1: any sense. But when you look at all this stuff
Speaker 1: and you look at the polls, let me ask you
Speaker 1: a question. Okay, you know that the Democrats and the
Speaker 1: Republicans rig ballot access, no question about it. They're rigging
Speaker 1: Jerry Manderin, they pick the voters. Okay, But now we're
Speaker 1: supposed to believe the polls are true, the opinion polls
Speaker 1: before the election. We're supposed to be believed that the
Speaker 1: election polls are true. Were you born yesterday? If you
Speaker 1: think that's true, unbelievable, folks. We have such an unbelievably
Speaker 1: corrupt government. I don't believe those election results for a moment.
Speaker 1: And when you look at that, you know Massey's vote, Yeah,
Speaker 1: of course it's going to be a contested election. His
Speaker 1: go up by nineteen percent. But we're supposed to believe
Speaker 1: that all these boomers who get all their news from
Speaker 1: Fox never bothered to show up before, and then they
Speaker 1: show up yesterday. Really okay, sure, yeah, if you say so. Unbelievable.
Speaker 1: I just don't believe it. So that's the same kind
Speaker 1: of stuff we saw with Biden and others. And of
Speaker 1: course the Republicans play that game as well. They play
Speaker 1: the game of bring in smartmatic and voting machines. They
Speaker 1: play the game Trump says, we can't have honest elections
Speaker 1: if we're going to have vote by mail. Well, who
Speaker 1: was it that put in vote by mail? It was
Speaker 1: Donald Trump as part of his COVID pandemic fraud. It
Speaker 1: was a fraud, a lie. He was gaslighting the public.
Speaker 1: He had to go to that corrupt election for him
Speaker 1: because that was part of the gas lighting. Got to
Speaker 1: keep that narrative going so he could inject people with
Speaker 1: his bioweapon. That's it. That's it, folks. So the AP
Speaker 1: called Massew's race purportedly it was fifty five forty five.
Speaker 1: The Seal was ahead. And as I got to say,
Speaker 1: when you talk about Ed Gallryan, the seal, that's the
Speaker 1: seal is as far as i'm Fencerry, he is a
Speaker 1: trained performing seal, trained to perform for Israel, trained to
Speaker 1: perform for the military industrial complex. I have absolutely no
Speaker 1: respect for somebody who has the kinds of skills that
Speaker 1: seals have when they do the kind of stuff that
Speaker 1: Dan Crenshaw tempted, the kind of stuff that you know,
Speaker 1: Ed gall Ryan's gonna why do we bow before these people?
Speaker 1: And they're trained as killers, They're very good at that. Okay, fine,
Speaker 1: you know The problem is that if you take somebody
Speaker 1: who has no morality and you give them a lot
Speaker 1: of skills, whether it's killing people or whether it is
Speaker 1: running computers, they have no morality, that just makes them
Speaker 1: a lot more dangerous, doesn't it. And this guy never
Speaker 1: talked about anything except Israel and wars. Of course, those
Speaker 1: two things are always interconnected with America, aren't they, at
Speaker 1: least lately. So anyway, he got forty six thousand votes.
Speaker 1: And I guess Massy's three former opponents that he beat
Speaker 1: that put together this smear of this of this woman
Speaker 1: the last minute, you know, one of them took that
Speaker 1: deposition in the law office of another one that he beat,
Speaker 1: and then it was a third guy that he beat
Speaker 1: that promoted it right away. He was the first one
Speaker 1: to promote it. So nothing to see there, I'm sure. Anyway,
Speaker 1: the most expensive primary house race on record. Just to
Speaker 1: put this in perspective, the general figure that everybody's putting there.
Speaker 1: Of course, I expect this to rise as they look
Speaker 1: more carefully, but they're saying thirty two million dollars is
Speaker 1: spend on the two of them. This is for a
Speaker 1: house race, you know, stop and think about that. How
Speaker 1: many people live in that district. How much did they
Speaker 1: spend per voter? It's ludicrous. It's just a metric of corruption.
Speaker 1: If you go back to Ronald Reagan's election, right, how
Speaker 1: much did Ronald Reagan spend to get elected against an
Speaker 1: incumbent president Jimmy Carter? Fifty eight million. That's what's happened
Speaker 1: to the corruption, That's what's happened to the purchasing power
Speaker 1: of our dollar. I mean, you don't even get a
Speaker 1: good politician for that kind of money anymore. Right, the
Speaker 1: price of houses have gone up, the price of cars
Speaker 1: have gone up, the price of politicians has gone through
Speaker 1: the roof as well. It's insane. You can only laugh
Speaker 1: at this kind of stuff, Absolutely insane. Yeah, inflation, and
Speaker 1: of course we also have to factor in which they
Speaker 1: didn't factor in. It wasn't reported to the FEC, all
Speaker 1: of the money with Iran Contra and Bill Casey, who
Speaker 1: was one of the creators of this corrupt CIA, the
Speaker 1: Corruption Intelligence Agency, criminal Intelligence Agency, people doing assassinations and
Speaker 1: coups and all the rest of it. So, yeah, as
Speaker 1: Trump was saying, Thomas Massey, the horrible congressman, the worst
Speaker 1: congressman the history of our country, Well is what is
Speaker 1: your country? Donald? Is it Israel? Perhaps Thomas Massey is
Speaker 1: the worst congressman in the history of Israel. That's the
Speaker 1: reality of what we're talking about here. As I said yesterday, Uh,
Speaker 1: Trump doesn't get credit for beating Massy. He didn't put
Speaker 1: up all the money. It was Zionist billionaires. It was
Speaker 1: a pack as all these other people. The Zionists are
Speaker 1: the ones who defeated Massey. It was never about Trump
Speaker 1: versus Massey. In spite of all the mainstream media nonsense
Speaker 1: and most of the other commentators out there, this is
Speaker 1: a revenge tour of Zog, the Zionist occupied government against
Speaker 1: Thomas Massey, and Zog won. Wasn't that the name of
Speaker 1: the villain that buzz Lightyer was fighting against Zog, wasn't
Speaker 1: it Zurich? Okay, all right close. He needed to bring
Speaker 1: him out again anyway, So Pete Hegseth, Pete hegg Seth
Speaker 1: goes to campaign for him. And we're supposed to believe
Speaker 1: that all of a sudden that made all the difference
Speaker 1: in the world, right, turned things around, you know, to
Speaker 1: a ten point lead, when Massey had a lead throughout
Speaker 1: all of this and also, let me just say this
Speaker 1: in terms of the fact that it was not Trump
Speaker 1: who defeated him. Remember Trump going to defeat him first,
Speaker 1: and he was one of the first people that Trump
Speaker 1: first Republicans that Trump said, we got to get him
Speaker 1: out right. Why because he pushed against Trump's fraudulent pandemic relief,
Speaker 1: fraudulent relief program for a fraudulent pandemic. And we see
Speaker 1: how rife that was with corruption. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: I can't remember the guy's name, but I interviewed a
Speaker 1: guy who was hired by the Trump administration to audit
Speaker 1: the vote, and he said, because that's what he did.
Speaker 1: And they contacted him about that bailout program that Trump
Speaker 1: was doing as he threw us into a mini depression,
Speaker 1: and he said, this thing is just going to be
Speaker 1: rife with corruption the way it's set up. And he said, well,
Speaker 1: we haven't had anything happen yet. He because we haven't
Speaker 1: even started the program yet. This is just your proposal.
Speaker 1: And that's the absurdity that comes from the Trump people.
Speaker 1: And of course we saw how corrupt it was. And
Speaker 1: so Thomas Massey pushed against that. He said, we can't
Speaker 1: do three billion dollar universal basic income welfare program, which
Speaker 1: is what it was. It was moving the Overton window
Speaker 1: toward universal basic income. Let's see what happens. Let's run
Speaker 1: a test. Let's see what happens if we take jobs
Speaker 1: away from everybody in this particular case, will say you
Speaker 1: can't have your job because you've got to stay home
Speaker 1: because of this imaginary virus that's everywhere. And so let's
Speaker 1: take everybody's job and then see if we can pacify
Speaker 1: them with universal basic income. What worked like a charm,
Speaker 1: didn't it. Everybody loved their STEMI check and boom, just
Speaker 1: like that, they realized that when they take everything from us,
Speaker 1: with whatever manufactured crisis they're going to do, they'll be
Speaker 1: able to pacify the vast majority of Americans. They got
Speaker 1: exactly what they wanted out of it. Well, Thomas Massey
Speaker 1: didn't like it because of the budget busting spending that
Speaker 1: was happening, and so he opposed it. And furthermore, he
Speaker 1: made all of the members of Congress come back to
Speaker 1: vote on it in person, which they really hated because
Speaker 1: you know, some of them may have actually believed the
Speaker 1: hype about the pandemic. They thought they're going to die, right,
Speaker 1: He knew better, and he did a great job, a
Speaker 1: great service showing people that they weren't going to die.
Speaker 1: I remember when this stuff really began, like back in
Speaker 1: Arch or something of twenty twenty, they had se Span
Speaker 1: and they not sea Span, it was what was it
Speaker 1: seapack seapack, Sorry, one boring thing confused with another boring thing.
Speaker 1: So they had Seapack. All the conservatives there, and all
Speaker 1: these conservative politicians show up to speak to people because
Speaker 1: it's an election year twenty twenty, and then they say, oh,
Speaker 1: we had some people who were there. They tested positive
Speaker 1: with a fauccy PCR test, and all the left was like, hey,
Speaker 1: all these conservatives are going to die. Nobody got sick.
Speaker 1: I mean, you got people in the kind of health
Speaker 1: condition that these aged senators like Mitch McConnell are in.
Speaker 1: None of them got sick, none of them died. It
Speaker 1: was nothing at all. But they were going around getting
Speaker 1: their PCR tests and thinking if they got a positive,
Speaker 1: oh see I've got COVID and look I survived it.
Speaker 1: You know, That's what we hear from some of them.
Speaker 1: But Thomas Massey made them come back in and vote.
Speaker 1: Because of that, Trump put him on blast we're going
Speaker 1: to primary him out. Trump was not able to primary
Speaker 1: him out in twenty twenty. Trump wasn't able to get
Speaker 1: rid of him in twenty twenty two, wasn't able to
Speaker 1: get rid of him in twenty twenty four. There wasn't
Speaker 1: the Zionist who got involved in this, folks, And I'm
Speaker 1: telling you it was his opposition to their war. It
Speaker 1: was his opposition to their owning Congress that was what
Speaker 1: made it necessary for them to get rid of him
Speaker 1: by hook or by crook. And as Jonathan Pollard said
Speaker 1: when he was talking about using nuclear weapons against other
Speaker 1: countries in the Middle East, he said, we have to
Speaker 1: make sure they understand that there is nothing that we
Speaker 1: won't do. If they understand that there's any limit to
Speaker 1: what we do, we've lost. Well, I think you've done
Speaker 1: a pretty good job of showing people there's no limits
Speaker 1: to how low Israel will go.
Speaker 2: Yes, the video of him saying that is in the day.
Speaker 1: Yes, I know, I got it. I'm not going to
Speaker 1: play it just yet. I want to get some of
Speaker 1: this other stuff out of the way. So anyway, he said,
Speaker 1: you can tell them I head the polls and they're desperate.
Speaker 1: That's why they're sending the Secretary of War to my district.
Speaker 1: That's why the president's losing sleep and tweeting about this.
Speaker 1: It's why APAC has dumped another three million into the race.
Speaker 1: Over the last weekend there I had a record amount,
Speaker 1: and so, as I point out, you know, in the
Speaker 1: last week, they bumped it up by another fifty percent. Again,
Speaker 1: when you look at the public opinion polls that they took,
Speaker 1: they're supposed to believe that all of a sudden everything
Speaker 1: got turned around because of Hegseeth visiting. I guess I
Speaker 1: just don't buy it, and I especially don't buy it
Speaker 1: when you look at the voter turnout numbers that are there.
Speaker 1: I think there's some stuffing going in going on, and
Speaker 1: I don't think it's just money into the pockets of politicians.
Speaker 2: Yes, s DGA is pointing out there was forty people
Speaker 2: at the headcept speech in Kentucky.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right. Yeah, where we've seen that before. You know,
Speaker 1: you see these politicians and nobody should. And let me
Speaker 1: tell you something. I have gone to rally after rally
Speaker 1: as a reporter, and I've also gone to rallies as
Speaker 1: a candidate, and somebody involved in the third party. You
Speaker 1: don't get typically more than forty people turning up at
Speaker 1: a rally. When you get somebody, you get the kind
Speaker 1: of crowds that Trump gets, the kind of crowds that
Speaker 1: Massy got. That's a very different thing. It's unbelievably different
Speaker 1: to see that. And so, yeah, forty people at an
Speaker 1: ed gallrain thing. And even when I played the clip
Speaker 1: yesterday of where he had these people screening him from
Speaker 1: a veteran, from a person who had the honorary title
Speaker 1: of Kentucky colonel who wanted to ask ed some questions,
Speaker 1: He's got people who are standing there, you know, in suits,
Speaker 1: with their arms folded, and they keep moving in front
Speaker 1: of the guy. And as Ed moves, three of them
Speaker 1: get in front of him, and he wasn't going to
Speaker 1: push his way through. But somebody filmed it and showed
Speaker 1: how they screened him out. Ed does not want to
Speaker 1: answer questions. There's a good reason for that, because seals
Speaker 1: don't talk. Seals applaud and they bart for their masters.
Speaker 1: On cue. You just throw them some fish and you're good.
Speaker 1: Trump hates Massy because the principled Kentucky in voted against
Speaker 1: budget busting Big Beautiful Bill Massy also pushed for the
Speaker 1: release of the Epstein files. And again, this is the America,
Speaker 1: but it began in twenty twenty when he was exposing
Speaker 1: the waste and the fraud of the COVID pandemic lies.
Speaker 1: And so when you look at Massy, Trump says he
Speaker 1: is disloyal, disloyal. I guess you know you can. You
Speaker 1: don't want to throw stones in a glasshouse, but you
Speaker 1: can throw stones if you're in the White House. I
Speaker 1: guess the adulterer in chief calls somebody else disloyal. And
Speaker 1: I thought that was the most amazing thing. He attacks
Speaker 1: Thomas Massey for getting married after a year and a
Speaker 1: half after his wife died. It's like, yeah, what's the
Speaker 1: matter with this guy? Why did he wait until after
Speaker 1: his wife of thirty five years died. That's not the
Speaker 1: way Trump does it, is it? And so now there
Speaker 1: are tertiary effects that are going to take place. Trump
Speaker 1: and his rants and his boasting talking about rand Paul
Speaker 1: and Bobert, they will These are the thrashings of the
Speaker 1: wounded narcissists out there and his ego politics. The fury
Speaker 1: continued at eight twelve am as they go through a
Speaker 1: timeline of all of Trump's furious tweets, he voted against
Speaker 1: almost everything that is good, that is me, right Trump.
Speaker 1: And then at ten forty seven am, Trump called Massy
Speaker 1: an obstructionist and a fool. Yeah, the ED and Trump
Speaker 1: supporters don't get their news from Twitter. They get it
Speaker 1: from faux news, fau x people like Laura Ingram. Massy
Speaker 1: did vote against the Big Beautiful Bill, but not because
Speaker 1: it included tax cuts. I'm funding for a border wall. No,
Speaker 1: because it would increase the national debt. Trump is a Democrat.
Speaker 1: He never talks about spending cuts. He may talk about
Speaker 1: tax cuts for some groups. He tells you that other
Speaker 1: people are going to pay the taxes. Right, you won't
Speaker 1: pay the tariffs. It'll be corporations in other countries even
Speaker 1: that will pay the tariffs. No, We've got a lot
Speaker 1: of businesses, small businesses that are going out of business
Speaker 1: because of Trump's tariff tantrums. And he also tells you
Speaker 1: that taxes are your path through prosperity. Taxes will be
Speaker 1: paid by other people, and taxes will make you rich.
Speaker 1: This is standard Democrat fair, always has been. Thats why
Speaker 1: I say Trump, more than anything is a New York
Speaker 1: City Democrat, and he has prostituted himself to Israel and
Speaker 1: to the technocrat billionaires of Silicon Valley. Although there were
Speaker 1: some conservative wins in the Budget reconciliation, says the New American,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, not New American. This is Massy saying, vote
Speaker 1: against it because bill would increase the national debt. Although
Speaker 1: there were some conservative wins in the Budget reconciliation, I
Speaker 1: voted no on the final passage because it will still
Speaker 1: significantly increase the US budget deficits in the near term.
Speaker 1: It will negatively impact all Americans through sustained inflation and
Speaker 1: high interest rates. Trump doesn't care about any of that.
Speaker 1: You know, he made the amazing statement a week ago,
Speaker 1: I don't really care about americans finances, and then yesterday
Speaker 1: he comes in and he says, yeah, you know, all
Speaker 1: that stuff that's happening with fuel and the embargo that
Speaker 1: I put on oil through my idiotic war and the
Speaker 1: results of that locking down the street, that's all peanuts.
Speaker 1: I don't care about that. He just doesn't care about you.
Speaker 1: I'm sure he doesn't care about He doesn't fill up
Speaker 1: his limousines at the gas pump. He never has, and
Speaker 1: he's always got either a chauffeur to do it, and
Speaker 1: he's got the Secret Service to do it. It's always
Speaker 1: had big limousines, always had private airliners, not just a
Speaker 1: private jet. He has an entire you know, like something
Speaker 1: you would have one hundred and two hundred people fly on.
Speaker 1: That's what he does. And now he's got the beast
Speaker 1: the taxpayers pay for. It. Doesn't get a certain number
Speaker 1: of miles per gallon. It gets gallons per mile. It's
Speaker 1: more like an Abram tank. And that's basically what it is.
Speaker 1: Because the presidents of this country are so despised by
Speaker 1: everyone in the world, including Americans, you have to travel
Speaker 1: around in a tank with a small army to protect
Speaker 1: them because of the ill will that they create everywhere.
Speaker 1: So these guys just like Trump ed gollerin. It's been told,
Speaker 1: don't debate. They know these guys can't handle a debate.
Speaker 1: They just give them some talking points, let them regurgitate
Speaker 1: those talking points. If they were actually to get into
Speaker 1: a debate, you would see just how empty they are now.
Speaker 1: They don't even understand what they're doing. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, you see that with Trump all the time. Yeah,
Speaker 1: as many people point out, you know, the problem with
Speaker 1: lying is you don't have a good enough memory. Well,
Speaker 1: Trump's memory is at the point where he can't lie
Speaker 1: without contradicting himself in the same sentence. But if these
Speaker 1: guys were to get in and to start debating on
Speaker 1: some of these issues, you know, like whether or not
Speaker 1: the Big Beautiful Bill was a good deal for the
Speaker 1: American taxpayer and for the American country, you would see
Speaker 1: just how shallow his understanding is. You'd see how shallow
Speaker 1: Trump's understanding it. So these guys who are put up
Speaker 1: as placeholders, as avatars for the billionaires who own them,
Speaker 1: they're told not to debate. Trump didn't want to have
Speaker 1: any debates. Biden didn't want to have any debates. Ed
Speaker 1: gall Rand doesn't want to have any debates. And this
Speaker 1: is one of the reasons why Maga is constantly surprised.
Speaker 1: Well wait a minute, I thought Trump stood for this,
Speaker 1: and look he's doing exactly the opposite. Yeah, it's because.
Speaker 2: Fox News will do a much better job of selling
Speaker 2: you as a candidate than you can. That's right, through
Speaker 2: your lies on the podium.
Speaker 1: That's right. You can get Laura Ingram to sell this stuff,
Speaker 1: and all the rest of the people on Fox News. So,
Speaker 1: as The Courier Journal of Louisville reported, gall Ryan left
Speaker 1: the GOP Trump is elected in twenty sixteen to become
Speaker 1: an independent. Then he returned to the party in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty after Biden was inaugurated. Well, I would say, after
Speaker 1: he was selected, right, and so you know, you look
Speaker 1: at that election that they're so upset about. That was
Speaker 1: as fair as any of these elections are all corrupt,
Speaker 1: none of them are honest. Margie Teylergreen said there are
Speaker 1: only four of US Republicans that signed the discharge petition
Speaker 1: to force the vote to release the Epstein files. Trump
Speaker 1: has come after us one by one ever since. If
Speaker 1: that isn't a confession of guilt, it's as close as
Speaker 1: you will ever get from Donald Trump to confessing to
Speaker 1: what we all saw that he was Epstein's best friend
Speaker 1: and party Powell for over a decade. The President told
Speaker 1: Speaker Johnson not to allow the vote to happen, and
Speaker 1: he did his best. Remember he they take pretty much
Speaker 1: the entire month of August off every time anyway, and
Speaker 1: Johnson shut it down early to keep there from being
Speaker 1: a vote. And then he refused to open up and said, well,
Speaker 1: it's because we've got a shutdown. Well, that's never stopped
Speaker 1: them before. That doesn't have anything to do with their pay.
Speaker 1: They've always met. Even if there was a shutdown, he
Speaker 1: didn't want to seat the Democrat who had gotten elected
Speaker 1: in a special election because that was one more vote
Speaker 1: to release the Epstein file. So Mike Johnson, at the
Speaker 1: behest of Trump, humiliated himself. I mean, you could tell
Speaker 1: this guy, goes, stay in the corner and pee in
Speaker 1: your pants in front of everybody, and Mike Johnson would
Speaker 1: do it. You do it out of fear. Quite frankly,
Speaker 1: it was only when all members of Congress had to
Speaker 1: vote on the record. Only then did Republicans finally find
Speaker 1: their intestinal forty two to do the right thing and
Speaker 1: vote yes to release the finals. Until then, they were
Speaker 1: absurdly obedient to the president who was doing everything in
Speaker 1: his reign of terror, said Marjorie Taylorgreen to hold them back. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it was absurd. It was futile what Mike Johnson and
Speaker 1: Donald Trump did. And if ever there was a confession
Speaker 1: of guilt, that is the closest you'll ever get from
Speaker 1: Trump his actual actions and so something that Massey says
Speaker 1: a new American became a top priority target for defeat
Speaker 1: by the Israel lobby last year when he told a podcaster,
Speaker 1: and that would be Tucker Carlson, that every GOP congressman
Speaker 1: has a babysitter from apac SO and that the lobby
Speaker 1: expects congressmen to write pro Israel propaganda. I disagree with that.
Speaker 1: I think it was his principled opposition to the Iran war.
Speaker 1: Everybody already knew that all these congressmen have a babysitter.
Speaker 1: That was anything new. But this war is what they want.
Speaker 1: Let's not forget that Israel and especially Massad had a
Speaker 1: connection to Epstein and to Glayne Maxwell. It's a question
Speaker 1: of whether or not Trump will pardon her. It's not
Speaker 1: a question of whether or not he'll do it, but
Speaker 1: when he'll do it. Okay, he pardoned Jonathan Pollard, the
Speaker 1: worst trader and spy. Actually he didn't pardon him. They
Speaker 1: paroled him, let him go back to Israel. But still
Speaker 1: the fact that he didn't have a problem with that
Speaker 1: because Miriam Maddison flew him back on her private plane
Speaker 1: and Natanya, who was waiting at the foot of the
Speaker 1: steps to greet him, and Jonathan Pollard gets down on
Speaker 1: the ground and kisses the ground there in Israel, and
Speaker 1: so does Miriam Maddilson right next to him. Let me
Speaker 1: look at that. Yeah, he did it for BB he
Speaker 1: did it for Miriam. Trump did. And when you look
Speaker 1: at this war issue, I really think that is the issue.
Speaker 1: It's amazing, really when you stop and think about how
Speaker 1: much alike Netan Yahoo and Trump are. Both of them
Speaker 1: have a long list of corruption charges brought against them
Speaker 1: by their own people and their own government, and they
Speaker 1: both want war now. I mean, they have become mirror
Speaker 1: images of each other. Here's what Thomas Massey had to
Speaker 1: say about just before the voting yesterday.
Speaker 3: A Fox, they were saying, oh my goodness, you know
Speaker 3: we're ready for war. There's about this. We're about to
Speaker 3: restart this war. We were supposed to restart this war today.
Speaker 3: But we can't restart this war today. The war can't
Speaker 3: start today. They said, we got away today. And then
Speaker 3: like it occurred to me, where was the Secretary of
Speaker 3: War yesterday?
Speaker 2: He was here.
Speaker 4: Listen, wait wait, wait, wait, no, look on the look
Speaker 4: on the bright side.
Speaker 1: That's what it is, folks. We don't want war. Thrial
Speaker 1: demands that we go to war for their good, not
Speaker 1: far good. Knock that off.
Speaker 3: You're gonna make me feel good about losing. What I
Speaker 3: wanted to do was give you all credit. When they
Speaker 3: saw the influencers here, they panicked, They sent the Secretary
Speaker 3: of War here, and.
Speaker 1: You stopped the war for a day. All right.
Speaker 3: We know we don't want a war, and we know
Speaker 3: why young people are and you know middle aged people
Speaker 3: are against the next war because we'd be the ones
Speaker 3: fighting it. They're trying to bring back the draft.
Speaker 5: Screw that.
Speaker 6: We're not We're not gonna fight.
Speaker 3: We're not gonna fight some other countries wars?
Speaker 1: Are we no? What else?
Speaker 3: What else do we stand for? Not we don't want
Speaker 3: to send our money overseas? Okay, I'll go for that.
Speaker 1: In the FED. And don't just stop with the reserve
Speaker 1: a bill to.
Speaker 3: Do that to end the ED in the Department of Education,
Speaker 3: Rand Paul says he wants to pass the law that
Speaker 3: you need one day to read ten pages of every bill.
Speaker 3: I asked, Rand, what are you going to do about
Speaker 3: my bill that's one sentence long to end the Department
Speaker 3: of Education, That'd be like five minutes to read that bill.
Speaker 5: By the way you go.
Speaker 3: Steve Foles Transparency Act was two pages. We don't want
Speaker 3: We're tired of medal overseas. We can't afford it. Our
Speaker 3: empire will collapse if we kept sending our money to
Speaker 3: other countries. I never picked a fight with the country
Speaker 3: that's tried to take me out here because I've never
Speaker 3: but I've never voted for feign a to any country.
Speaker 6: We got to take care of America first, America first, America, first, America, first, America,
Speaker 6: first America first.
Speaker 1: By the way, there.
Speaker 3: Was you remember that organization that Klaus Schwab started called
Speaker 3: the World Economic Forum. They said you should eat bugs?
Speaker 3: Do you want to eat bugs? He said, you'll own
Speaker 3: nothing and be happy about it.
Speaker 1: You want to do that?
Speaker 3: Well, guess what happened. Guess what happened to Klaus's CEO.
Speaker 3: He was in the Epstein files. He had to resign.
Speaker 3: We took out We took out the CEO of the
Speaker 3: World Economic Forum with a two page bill.
Speaker 1: It's amazing, isn't it. You know, we look at the
Speaker 1: bills and the way they operated this stuff. The GOP,
Speaker 1: especially under Mike Johnson, has adopted all of the levers
Speaker 1: of power that Nancy Pelosi corruptly put in place. She
Speaker 1: was the first one to drop a you know, several
Speaker 1: thousand page bill one day before the vote, so nobody
Speaker 1: had any time to read it. That's what Ran Paul
Speaker 1: is reacting to. You know, they put these bills together,
Speaker 1: they're not you know, they're thousand pages long, and then
Speaker 1: they drop them on the eve of the vote to
Speaker 1: make it even worse. They want to make sure that
Speaker 1: you don't know what's in it. And of course that
Speaker 1: was when Nancy Pelosi famously said, well, I got a passive,
Speaker 1: I know what's in it. And of course she knew
Speaker 1: what was in it, and she was the devil's the
Speaker 1: devil's details are going to be put in by the bureaucracy.
Speaker 1: Quite frankly, that was really, I think what she was
Speaker 1: talking about. But that's the strategy that has been adopted
Speaker 1: by the Republican speakers as well, just like the insider
Speaker 1: trading of Nancy Pelosi has been adopted by Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: As I pointed out yesterday, when you've got Josh Holly saying, hey,
Speaker 1: we need to stop this insider trading. He writes a
Speaker 1: bill that includes the president and the Vice president and
Speaker 1: his cabinet. Trump went after him with a vengeance. How
Speaker 1: dare you tell me I can't do insider trading. As
Speaker 1: I've said for the longest time, the Republicans have become
Speaker 1: the Democrats of my youth. The Democrats have become the
Speaker 1: tutalitarian Marxists of my youth. That's where we are right now.
Speaker 1: As the New American finishes up talking about they talk
Speaker 1: about how much money, and we all know how much
Speaker 1: money Apac threw in. You know, over fifteen million dollars
Speaker 1: is thrown in by the Israeli lobby against him. That
Speaker 1: will be an abomination.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, what and that's an old number. I've seen
Speaker 2: thirty five million quoted or thirty two million, Well.
Speaker 1: They dropped in, they dropped in. At least a third
Speaker 1: of that was dropped in the last week of that
Speaker 1: total that's there. But I think the thirty million, I
Speaker 1: think that is a figure that is combining what the
Speaker 1: two of them did. You know, But you know, he
Speaker 1: didn't have anywhere close to the amount of money that
Speaker 1: Edgal Ryan did, so I think probably he's going to
Speaker 1: wind up being more like twenty five million once they
Speaker 1: quote that in there, and then the rest of it,
Speaker 1: you know, like a seven million or whatever mass these people.
Speaker 1: He did a massive money bomb, got one point three
Speaker 1: million dollars. The next day you got an Israeli billionaire
Speaker 1: who writes a check the same amount. One person. Erases
Speaker 1: the contributions of all those other people. As New American
Speaker 1: pointed out, he has Trump says, he votes for horrible thing,
Speaker 1: you know, like freedom in the Constitution, things like that.
Speaker 1: He has a lifetime rating of ninety nine percent of
Speaker 1: the New American's Freedom Index. He also received a one
Speaker 1: hundred percent grade four different times. He has never been
Speaker 1: evaluated below ninety seven. These are the kind of people
Speaker 1: that Trump and the Zionists and the technocrats need to
Speaker 1: purge out of Congress. So again you look at WND,
Speaker 1: which is a Zionist pushing website, and there's a resounding
Speaker 1: victory for the president. No, it was a resounding victory
Speaker 1: for Israel. And as President Trump has pointed out, where
Speaker 1: does her loyalty lie?
Speaker 7: She loves this country. Her and her husband are so incredible, real,
Speaker 7: so dearly. But I actually asked I'm going to get
Speaker 7: her in trouble with this. But I actually asked her
Speaker 7: once they said so Miriam, I know you love Israel.
Speaker 8: What do you love more? The United States or Israel?
Speaker 8: She refused to answer. That means that might mean it'sue.
Speaker 1: Yeah, she refuses to answer which country she loves more,
Speaker 1: And just like she refuses to answer, how does she
Speaker 1: get all these politicians to do what she wants?
Speaker 9: You and Sheldon created a lot of relationship over the
Speaker 9: years with politicians at the state level, especially at.
Speaker 1: The federal level. Mastro slave relationship.
Speaker 9: I want you to share with everyone. Why is it
Speaker 9: so important? And how do you do it?
Speaker 1: Again?
Speaker 9: Writing checks is part of it, but there is more
Speaker 9: than writing just checks. So how do you do it?
Speaker 1: Can you allow me not to answer?
Speaker 2: You choose?
Speaker 1: I don't want to tell you. I want to be truthfully,
Speaker 1: and there are so many things that I don't want
Speaker 1: to talk about. Yeah, I mean, we don't want specific
Speaker 1: but this is like the old thing from from Bismarck
Speaker 1: saying you don't want to see how the laws are made,
Speaker 1: as like a sausage factory.
Speaker 2: And it's also worth noting that she gets a big
Speaker 2: hand of applause both times. What do you love more America?
Speaker 2: Is Well, she's not gonna say, but I think you
Speaker 2: know what that means, and the audience goes wild. The
Speaker 2: same thing for well, you know, money won't do everything
Speaker 2: with politicians that there's other things. I won't tell you
Speaker 2: what those are, but I've got other methods. And then
Speaker 2: she gets a big round of applause for that as well.
Speaker 1: We have outer ways, right, Yeah, you get as much
Speaker 1: as you can with the money, and if that doesn't work,
Speaker 1: you bring in Epstein and Masade. Right, that always turns
Speaker 1: a trick, literally, I guess. But I just want to
Speaker 1: go back to Jonathan Pollard. You know, we want to
Speaker 1: Trump is out there calling people traders. You don't want
Speaker 1: to talk about Jonathan Pollard. You don't want to talk
Speaker 1: about Miriam Maddilson, who is your owner, Donor. You don't
Speaker 1: want to talk about her and her connection with Jonathan Pollard.
Speaker 1: I think it's very interesting to listen to Jonathan Pollard
Speaker 1: talking about the use of nuclear weapons to blackmail the
Speaker 1: United States, and let me just put this into context.
Speaker 1: He begins with an event that happened in October nineteen
Speaker 1: seventy three. He said, Henry Kissinger, by the way, jewish right.
Speaker 1: But he didn't want to, you know, in terms of
Speaker 1: what he was doing. He was trying to not because
Speaker 1: he loved America, but because that's where his power base was.
Speaker 1: He was at least putting American interest because that was
Speaker 1: his interest over that of Israel. And he wasn't going
Speaker 1: to support Israel in October nineteen seventy three. So what
Speaker 1: they did was they said, fly your your satellite, of
Speaker 1: your surveillance equipment of planes or whatever it was at
Speaker 1: the time. Take a look at this plane that's parked
Speaker 1: over here. What do you see under the wings there?
Speaker 1: And he plays these games. He won't say that it's
Speaker 1: a nuclear weapon, but he will do things like you'll
Speaker 1: call it a weapon of mass destruction, an unconventional weapon
Speaker 1: of mass destruction, something like the Japanese solution. I mean,
Speaker 1: we all know what Jonathan Pollard is alluding to the
Speaker 1: people who are interviewing him. Know, this is the thing
Speaker 1: that rubs the salt in the wound when these people
Speaker 1: lie to your face, when they boast about what they're doing,
Speaker 1: and then they use these code words like you don't
Speaker 1: know what I'm talking about, do you you know? So again,
Speaker 1: this is October nineteenth, and then what happened also in
Speaker 1: October nineteen, say that he was successful in terms of
Speaker 1: blackmailing the US government to help them and their nineteen
Speaker 1: seventy three war. What happened that same month, you had
Speaker 1: the OPEC embargo. It was just directed at the United States.
Speaker 1: It wasn't directed at anybody else, And it was directed
Speaker 1: at US because we helped Israel. So it uses nuclear
Speaker 1: blackmail to blackmail our cooperation and assistance they do. And
Speaker 1: I noticed that Jonathan Pollard says, we we This is
Speaker 1: nineteen seventy three. He wasn't arrested as a spy until
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty five. This is twelve years before he's arrested.
Speaker 1: All through that time, his loyalty is to Israel, a
Speaker 1: disloyal traitor to the country that he was born in.
Speaker 1: And so they blackmail us into that. And the response
Speaker 1: from OPEK, directed only in the United States, still had
Speaker 1: a global impact. It set off inflation in terms of
Speaker 1: energy prices and all these other issues that happen economic
Speaker 1: cardship around the globe. And it was only about fifteen
Speaker 1: percent of America's oil supply at the time. Now, Trump,
Speaker 1: having been prodded into yet another war in the Middle
Speaker 1: East by Israel, sets off the Trump oil embargo, which
Speaker 1: would be much worse than the OPEC oil embargo because
Speaker 1: closing straight OVERMUZ has stopped twenty percent of the global supply.
Speaker 1: And so this is what they've been doing to America
Speaker 1: for the longest time. Here's the clips had.
Speaker 8: Such power and rightfully over Congress, and now it doesn't.
Speaker 8: What do you love more, the United States or Israel?
Speaker 8: She refused to answer. That means that might mean it's.
Speaker 10: My father raised me never to mosta another Jew, never
Speaker 10: to betray another Jew. If it were in front of
Speaker 10: a Kosher bed dinn, as my foccer said, that.
Speaker 2: Was one thing.
Speaker 10: But in front of the gham, No, that's around back
Speaker 10: into the Stone Age.
Speaker 1: How how would they do that?
Speaker 11: What do you suggest?
Speaker 10: I've written quite a bit openly here about what we
Speaker 10: should do. The first thing is an electromagnetic pulse strike
Speaker 10: across Iran. If the enemy understands that there are limits
Speaker 10: past which we will not go, theyve won.
Speaker 9: So you think you think it's a it's cause rationale
Speaker 9: for another.
Speaker 1: Japanese response. Japanese response, Yeah yeah.
Speaker 11: Let me bring you back to nineteen seventy three during
Speaker 11: the Kapur War, when Henry Kissinger instituted an arms embargo
Speaker 11: against US. He stopped the aerial resupply of our army
Speaker 11: at that point to extract diplomatic concessions from US.
Speaker 1: And what happened. What happened was.
Speaker 11: An A four skyhawk was parked at Telnoth air Base
Speaker 11: with some interesting weapons under its wings. And we told
Speaker 11: the Americans, take your eye in the sky and to
Speaker 11: a good look at the airplane that's on that runway.
Speaker 11: And the next day the airlifts started. So the guy
Speaker 11: that I was charged with ch airlift to the to Israel.
Speaker 11: The arms zero. So in other words, we threatened there,
Speaker 11: We threatened to use unconventional weapons. I'll leave it at that.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, yeah, nuclear blackmail. The United States give us
Speaker 1: weapons or we're going to nuke Egypt. So nuke the
Speaker 1: whole Middle East there, and so they do, and so
Speaker 1: then Opek strikes out against the United States as a
Speaker 1: result of that. Israel doesn't care at all about us,
Speaker 1: This racist ethnic state only cares about their racist people.
Speaker 1: It's just like Nazi Germany. They have become exactly what
Speaker 1: they fought. You know, we are the master race. All
Speaker 1: the rest of you are goam, you're subhuman. We can
Speaker 1: betray you. We can steal from you. We don't care.
Speaker 1: That's what this is all about. The rift, says WND
Speaker 1: between Trump and Massy escalated in June twenty twenty five
Speaker 1: when Massy argued that the Trump strikes in Iran were unconstitutional. Well,
Speaker 1: there's already a riff again. The riff went back to
Speaker 1: Trump's pandemic fraud, and then it escalated over what over Israel,
Speaker 1: over natnya who's obsession with Iran, saying that it was
Speaker 1: imminent for over thirty years, And of course Trump is
Speaker 1: still saying and Hegseth is still saying it's imminent, even
Speaker 1: though at the same time he said it's nothing other
Speaker 1: than a pr event. To go back and get this stuff.
Speaker 1: It's all under rubble. And we've been watching this and
Speaker 1: nobody has gone close to it. Well, if nobody has
Speaker 1: gone close to it, it's under rubble. How could you
Speaker 1: say that it is an imminent threat, which means that
Speaker 1: you are obviously in violation and knowingly in violation of
Speaker 1: not just the constitutional requirement that Congress should declare war,
Speaker 1: but even the weaker version the War Powers Act that
Speaker 1: says that you can go to war for sixty days
Speaker 1: if there is an eminent threat. It doesn't say that
Speaker 1: the president can go attack or kill anybody that he
Speaker 1: wants to for sixty days and then he's got to
Speaker 1: get Congress's permission. No, there has to be an imminent threat. Well,
Speaker 1: the eminent threat was supposed to be the nuclear weapons,
Speaker 1: but Trump is saying there still isn't really any threat.
Speaker 1: We really don't need to go there, just be a
Speaker 1: PR thing. But I'm willing to kill a lot of
Speaker 1: people in order to do a PR stunt. Yeah, we
Speaker 1: noticed in twenty twenty that you're willing to kill millions
Speaker 1: of people. And so when you look at what Israeli
Speaker 1: propaganda has gone from after they began the genocide in Gaza,
Speaker 1: they have had to increase their propaganda spending by one
Speaker 1: hundred times. Instead of around seven million, they're now up
Speaker 1: to seven hundred thirty million in terms of propaganda. They
Speaker 1: will do whatever they need to do to keep up
Speaker 1: their agenda of war, murder and theft of land. So
Speaker 1: in the last days before the election they drop these
Speaker 1: lies about Massy's ex girlfriend. They're capable of doing anything.
Speaker 1: These are the people who ran the Epstein intelligence honeytraps,
Speaker 1: blackmailing other billionaires, so Massy loses, as a Reason points out,
Speaker 1: proving that deficit hawks and foreign policy doves are not
Speaker 1: welcome in Trump's GOP. That's what it has become. It
Speaker 1: is Trump's GOP. And they are guarding our pedophiles, or
Speaker 1: we could say guarding old pedophiles. Are not my pedophiles.
Speaker 1: I have absolutely no interest in these people. It further
Speaker 1: solidifies Israel's firm hold on the Republican Party.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: Reason says that further slidifies Trump's firm hold on the
Speaker 1: Republican Party. I think you know, as I said before,
Speaker 1: Trump wasn't able to get him out in twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: twenty two, twenty twenty four. But Israel dumping in tens
Speaker 1: of millions of dollars into a race, and they're willing
Speaker 1: to do that to your congressional race as well. And oh,
Speaker 1: by the way, if there's anything in your background, they
Speaker 1: probably will blackmail you over that as well. They know
Speaker 1: about all of that stuff as well, so that's how
Speaker 1: they they get. They have ways other than just money
Speaker 1: that Mary Maddilson would not like to talk about, and
Speaker 1: various ratings systems maintained by groups such as the Heritage
Speaker 1: Action and Conservative Review, and I read to you the
Speaker 1: John Burke Society's Freedom in DECKX, where he has a
Speaker 1: lifetime average of ninety nine. Thomas Massey did never below
Speaker 1: a ninety seven, and he has had a one hundred
Speaker 1: rating four times when they have evaluated him. But this
Speaker 1: is reason talking about heritage and Conservative Review that said
Speaker 1: he has always been an exemplary congressman. Well again, there
Speaker 1: is no need to excuse his betrayal of the Constitution,
Speaker 1: of Trump's betrayal of the Constitution, because even in his
Speaker 1: own promises, you know, he says, it's like playing five
Speaker 1: D chess. It's now being liked by Trump as the
Speaker 1: only test that matters. Gall Ryan passed that test. He
Speaker 1: defended Trump's war in Iran as part of five D chess,
Speaker 1: an effort to reset the entire global power structure. Let
Speaker 1: me ask you this, Maybe it's one of the reasons
Speaker 1: why I didn't want to go on and debate people.
Speaker 1: He doesn't seem too sharp. Does he think about what
Speaker 1: he's set here? He's playing five D chess? What is
Speaker 1: the purpose of playing five D chess in order to
Speaker 1: reset the global power system? The global power system was
Speaker 1: set up with the US at the top, if you're
Speaker 1: going to reset that power system as we see that
Speaker 1: happening in Iran, and we've talked about what is happening
Speaker 1: to the US power structure in the Middle East in Europe.
Speaker 1: If that's what your concern is, if you want US hegemony,
Speaker 1: if you want a US empire wh already had that,
Speaker 1: why would you reset that? And that's exactly what Trump's
Speaker 1: actions are doing. They are resetting the global power structure
Speaker 1: that has been in our favor. He's resetting that to
Speaker 1: something that is not in our.
Speaker 2: Favor, in favor of Israel.
Speaker 1: That's right, it was in favor of Israel. And it's
Speaker 1: also creating essentially a multipolar world with things like bricks
Speaker 1: and other stuff like that. So it is not what
Speaker 1: the American empire has always wanted. I guess I should
Speaker 1: be grateful about that. It's kind of the back end
Speaker 1: of all this stuff, just like everybody woke up about
Speaker 1: the vaccines with COVID. So they point out in reason,
Speaker 1: they say, and the Massy held on longer than most,
Speaker 1: But his path into political retirement is well worn and
Speaker 1: has been trodden by many Tea Party era Republicans who
Speaker 1: struck to their principles, only to discover the principles no
Speaker 1: longer matter to the contemporary GOP and their voters. Well
Speaker 1: Trump's descendants. Whatever energy was left in the Tea Party
Speaker 1: has now turned into pure populist rage and into tribal animus.
Speaker 1: And this is what you see all the time. It's like, well,
Speaker 1: if Thomas Massey is such a great Republican and conservative,
Speaker 1: why is he liked by Democrats. Well, he's liked by
Speaker 1: Democrats because he came after the Epstein files. He's liked
Speaker 1: by some Democrats because again opposing Trump, even when Trump
Speaker 1: is wrong, they just see that as fueling their tribe. Right.
Speaker 1: But these people coming out, they can't look at an
Speaker 1: issue and say is this right or wrong because they
Speaker 1: don't have any principles, have positions, and their positions are
Speaker 1: dictated by their tribal identity. That's how they run this
Speaker 1: stuff on the MAGA people. Even if Massey had won
Speaker 1: observed reasons Nick Gillespie, he said, the GEOP which he
Speaker 1: was a part is very different from the one that
Speaker 1: he belonged to when he first arrived in Washington. Irony
Speaker 1: and the fact that Massey once wrote in the Pages
Speaker 1: of Reason that Libertarians want to work within the Republican
Speaker 1: Party to achieve their political ends rather than aescuwe the
Speaker 1: two party system. Well, I don't believe in third party
Speaker 1: politics either, because that, as Massey pointed out, it's futile
Speaker 1: because the system has been completely restructured to favor these
Speaker 1: two parties. It is a political system that is for
Speaker 1: the parties, by the parties of the parties, and you
Speaker 1: need not apply. They don't want your vote, they don't
Speaker 1: want you participating in this whatsoever. I think that we
Speaker 1: need to go to a higher authority, the Lord Jesus Christ.
Speaker 1: That's the bottom line.
Speaker 2: Yes, what I'm just going to say that for a
Speaker 2: three party or anything other than a two party system
Speaker 2: to work, you need to get rid of first past
Speaker 2: the post voting and go something like ranked choice, or
Speaker 2: they are even better systems than ranked choice, like approval voting.
Speaker 2: But first past the post is always going to devolve
Speaker 2: into a two party duopoly, which we've seen historically over
Speaker 2: and over again.
Speaker 1: That's right, and it is the Republicans understand that. That's
Speaker 1: why they have pushed so hard wherever this has been
Speaker 1: experimented on, because they realize that if we have an
Speaker 1: alternative to have multiple candidates. They're going to be out
Speaker 1: the door. The Democrats have got their crazy constituents who
Speaker 1: are the sodom inco war crowd, and they're going to
Speaker 1: vote for them over those issues. I was just yesterday
Speaker 1: we were behind a car and they had bumper stickers
Speaker 1: up about Roe v. Wade in nineteen seventy three. It
Speaker 1: got my attention because they had like Filippian tubes or
Speaker 1: something as part of it, and it looked like some
Speaker 1: kind of a stylized bull or something when you're looking
Speaker 1: at it on the back of a car. But we
Speaker 1: were talking about that, and Karen says, can you imagine
Speaker 1: somebody loving abortion that much they put a sticker like
Speaker 1: that on their car. It's like, yeah, that's what the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party has become. It is really out of touch
Speaker 1: the mainstream. But so is the Republican Party. And the
Speaker 1: Republican Party knows that it wouldn't take much to move
Speaker 1: Republican voters, or Republican voters just vote for them out
Speaker 1: of disgust of what the Democrats have done, and so
Speaker 1: they know it wouldn't take too much. That's why they
Speaker 1: oppose all of these reforms of the first past the
Speaker 1: post system. They want to doopoly. It's the only way
Speaker 1: that they can survive. He worked his way up in
Speaker 1: the House to land a coveted seat on the powerful
Speaker 1: Rules Committee, until being removed last year by who by
Speaker 1: Mike Johnson. Again, they're going to play the power politics.
Speaker 1: You know, this is not the you know, I'm a bill,
Speaker 1: I'm a bill on Capitol Hill. That schoolhouse rock thing
Speaker 1: is long gone. These people in Congress, they had to fight,
Speaker 1: and part of these leadership fights as to who is
Speaker 1: going to be the speaker, And of course they had
Speaker 1: a temporary victory, but then they lost that as well
Speaker 1: once they got Johnson.
Speaker 2: In.
Speaker 1: Part of it was to say that we can introduce
Speaker 1: bills from the floor, that we can have debates, we
Speaker 1: can have a say at the floor. If you're in
Speaker 1: today's Congress, under the rules of Pelosi and Mike Johnson,
Speaker 1: you have no say. You can't even get your vote
Speaker 1: a vote on your bill if you write one. Really
Speaker 1: most cases, he hoped to lead an effort to block
Speaker 1: Trump's tariffs, and they were ruled unlawful in the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court that were later ruled unlawful in the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: Throughout all that Messy has committed to the principles of
Speaker 1: limited government, but he also put a huge target on
Speaker 1: his back. And again they didn't want to really mention
Speaker 1: what's going on Israel because if you talk about the
Speaker 1: interest of Israel and you say, yeah, they got angry
Speaker 1: with him because he didn't support the attacks in June
Speaker 1: or twenty twenty five. They got angry with him because
Speaker 1: he doesn't support the war and all the rest of
Speaker 1: this stuff. If you talk about that, oh, well, you
Speaker 1: are anti Semitic. They don't want that. They have been
Speaker 1: intimidated to not talk about that. Despite the fact that
Speaker 1: Massi's positions on war, on spending, on the Epstein files
Speaker 1: are more in line with Trump's campaign promises, then they
Speaker 1: are in align with Trump's actions in office. Again, Trump
Speaker 1: makes these promises to the majority asinine, gullible Americans MAGA,
Speaker 1: and even after President Trump does exactly the opposite of
Speaker 1: what Candidate Trump said he wanted to do, exactly the
Speaker 1: opposite of what the MAGA people want to see, they
Speaker 1: still don't do anything about it. Well, there is a
Speaker 1: move back, you know, he was very happy about the fact.
Speaker 1: I think in the case of Cassidy, it really was
Speaker 1: Trump's revenge Senator to Cassidy and Louisiana. That happened over
Speaker 1: the weekend. I think the Massy thing is Israel, but
Speaker 1: I think the Cassidy thing was Trump taking revenge on
Speaker 1: him because he voted to impeach Trump when he was
Speaker 1: president the first term. Well, Cassidy is getting a little
Speaker 1: bit of a revenge right now. The Senate has advanced
Speaker 1: a measure to end military action in Iran as a
Speaker 1: rebuke to Trump. And it happened because Cassidy switched sides.
Speaker 1: He may have lost the election for reelection, but he
Speaker 1: is still a Senator until next year. The Senate on
Speaker 1: Tuesday advanced a resolution to halt military action in Iran
Speaker 1: after a surprise defection, says CNBC, Oh much of a
Speaker 1: surprise is that really? From Republicans Bill Cassidy Louisiana, dealing
Speaker 1: a blow to Trump's war effort. The Senate now could
Speaker 1: have the votes to force Trump to pull back the
Speaker 1: military from Iran or to seek congressional approval for additional action.
Speaker 1: But despite the war resolution War Powers Resolution advancing fifty
Speaker 1: to forty seven, it still has little chance of becoming law.
Speaker 1: We need to pass a final vote in the Senate,
Speaker 1: then clear the House, and then Trump would almost be
Speaker 1: certain to veto it. But the vote does show increasing
Speaker 1: headwinds to the war with Iran and also headwinds for Zog.
Speaker 1: When we look at this, it's one of the reasons
Speaker 1: why it's so important to pay attention to the Constitution
Speaker 1: rather than just to this War Powers Act, because the
Speaker 1: War Powers Act is just a law. It is not
Speaker 1: a law violates the Constitution.
Speaker 5: Not a.
Speaker 1: Is not a legitimate law, and that law does violate
Speaker 1: the Constitution. The Constitution clearly says that it'll be Congress
Speaker 1: that will debate and declare war. It was something that
Speaker 1: was put in as a response to an emergency action
Speaker 1: because again you had all these presidents doing what Trump
Speaker 1: now does for everything, saying, well, I had to go
Speaker 1: I had to start this war because it was an emergency.
Speaker 1: There was an eminent threat, so we had to do
Speaker 1: something about it. And then I just got stuck there.
Speaker 1: You know, that's the problem with all this stuff. Well,
Speaker 1: the reality is is that if you're going to skip
Speaker 1: the Constitution because you declare an emergency, guess you because
Speaker 1: to declare the emergency the president does and he has
Speaker 1: done that over and over again, falsely declaring that emergency.
Speaker 1: So he has said that the War Powers Act is unconstitutional,
Speaker 1: and he's actually right because it eased up the requirement
Speaker 1: for going to war. There's actually stricter requirements in the
Speaker 1: Constitution that it's sloughed over. So we're going to take
Speaker 1: a quick break and do we have has Geralds joined
Speaker 1: us yet?
Speaker 2: He has not joined yet. We have quite a lot
Speaker 2: of comments.
Speaker 1: Yeah, let's do take the comments before we take a break.
Speaker 1: Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip, he says. You
Speaker 1: can forget any hope for real transparency of the Epstein
Speaker 1: files for sure. Now these are a lobby buys another seat.
Speaker 1: At least they will get all the wars they want
Speaker 1: with American money and blood. Yeah, I never had any
Speaker 1: hope for any Epstein transparency. We don't need to know
Speaker 1: anything more than we already know. Trump has basically confessed
Speaker 1: with his actions in terms of fighting all this stuff.
Speaker 1: And it's interesting to see people like Dan Bongino really
Speaker 1: angry with Thomas Massey because the whole Epstein thing outed
Speaker 1: Bongino as a hypocrite, fraud Marky Mark New Jersey, thank
Speaker 1: you for the tip, he said. The thirty two million
Speaker 1: wasn't even for the election, which would be in November.
Speaker 1: It was for a primary. Yeah, but again because of jerymandering.
Speaker 1: You know, they set these districts up for the benefit
Speaker 1: of the political party, So the Republican Party owns that district. Okay,
Speaker 1: we're back. I think we had OBS crash on us.
Speaker 1: I don't know. We need to look into something. If
Speaker 1: we could even pay for some obs is free. It
Speaker 1: works pretty well, but we've had a lot of issues
Speaker 1: with it lately. I don't know what is happening. Maybe
Speaker 1: it's some of the hardware that we had. It doesn't
Speaker 1: play well with it. I don't know. Anyway, let's continue
Speaker 1: on with the comments. I don't know where it got
Speaker 1: cut off, but we'll continue on with this. DG eight,
Speaker 1: thank you for the tippy, says David. You ever seen
Speaker 1: the movie Ideocracy? Yeah, I'm afraid so. But this is
Speaker 1: exactly what the government that we've got in to make
Speaker 1: it worse. A UFC event on the White House lawn
Speaker 1: in June. Again, we're taking it down to the lowest
Speaker 1: common denominator of intelligence. That is where we are with
Speaker 1: the Trump White House. But again, everything that the Trump
Speaker 1: White house. Does is really about a like a WWE
Speaker 1: wrestling event, isn't it? So people are struggling, Trump says,
Speaker 1: let them eat cake. Well, actually what he said was
Speaker 1: let them meet peanuts. Right, good grief, So fuzzy Matteo says,
Speaker 1: if Russia intervenes in our selections, it's a problem, But
Speaker 1: if it's Israel, it's okay. And you know Laura Lumer,
Speaker 1: who is not Jewish, but she wants to be Jewish
Speaker 1: at least that's what I hear. I don't know, you know,
Speaker 1: in genealogy doesn't really matter to me. It matters to
Speaker 1: the Jews, doesn't it. They're the ones who are racist.
Speaker 1: They're the ones who are calling everybody else racist. But
Speaker 1: I don't really care if she's Jewish or not. But
Speaker 1: she is a hardcore Zionist and she is now saying, well,
Speaker 1: Russia interfered in that mass the election. Really, well, what
Speaker 1: about what about Israel? That's not an issue. And it's
Speaker 1: not an issue that they don't have to register as
Speaker 1: foreign agents at APEC not an issue either. Audi Modern
Speaker 1: Retro Radio Good to See Audi says, I have a
Speaker 1: problem believing that Kentucky voters rejected the guy who got
Speaker 1: the Epstein files released, the PETO, and Chief's APAK puppet
Speaker 1: was installed. Yeah. Again, when we look at that, there's
Speaker 1: already some good evidence. As I said at the beginning
Speaker 1: of the program, the fact that Massey's vote totals went
Speaker 1: up like nineteen percent. We expected there to be an
Speaker 1: increase in the voter turnout, but overall they were up
Speaker 1: by three hundred and fifty six percent. How does that
Speaker 1: happen in a prime even with all this attention, I
Speaker 1: just don't buy that. I think there's some padding going on.
Speaker 1: DJ says, thank you for the tip, He says, David.
Speaker 1: Ohio Congressman Warren Davidson was boots on the ground in
Speaker 1: Kentucky for Massy. I'm sure he'll be in Trump's crosshairs
Speaker 1: as well. I'll be definitely voting for Davidson this term. Again. Good, Yes,
Speaker 1: said david It was proven yesterday the elected congressman no
Speaker 1: longer go to DC for their constituents. No, you've got
Speaker 1: to be there with the president for the party and
Speaker 1: the hell with the common folk. That's right, and all
Speaker 1: that matters is that you serve the interests of war.
Speaker 1: War is a lifeblood of the state, always has been,
Speaker 1: always will be. Soylent Goy says that APAX sent a
Speaker 1: message oppose Israel and lose your seat in Congress. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it was APAC versus Massey far more than it was Trump. Again.
Speaker 1: Trump had opposed him for a very long time over
Speaker 1: a number of issues. I'm not able to get him out.
Speaker 1: Sixty one. Thank you very much for the tip. Appreciate that.
Speaker 1: And there's Guard Goldsmith. Good to see your guard. Liberty
Speaker 1: Conspiracy says exactly, David. The aged voters who haven't participated
Speaker 1: in years suddenly emerged from their cages. They're caves. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: not cages, but from their caves. That's right. Bronx Stomper.
Speaker 1: One to eleven says gall Eran barely won his home county.
Speaker 1: I know several people live there and they are not fans.
Speaker 1: All the farmers around there, no, Ed. He hasn't worked
Speaker 1: on the farm in years, and it upsets them that
Speaker 1: he's claiming to be a quote unquote farmer to the
Speaker 1: uneducated city people. Thirty years in the Navy, Ed is
Speaker 1: an order follower. He's a hired killer. Folks. If you've
Speaker 1: got this massive, impressive resume that you can't show people
Speaker 1: it probably means that you were going out assassinating people,
Speaker 1: starting coups on orders from the government. I have no
Speaker 1: use for people like that. I don't care how skilled
Speaker 1: they are with a weapon. That makes them only more
Speaker 1: dangerous if they have no morality, if they're just take
Speaker 1: orders and do anything. And again, if it's something that's
Speaker 1: not criminal, why don't you tell people about it. This
Speaker 1: is the fallacy of the national security state. They have
Speaker 1: to classify everything to protect themselves. And we have seen
Speaker 1: this started out with the CIA declaring national security so
Speaker 1: they protect themselves, and they did coups and assassinations, and
Speaker 1: then we've seen this this corruption trickle down and the
Speaker 1: rotting fish riding from the head down. It has gone
Speaker 1: down to the lowest levels of government. I'm sorry, I
Speaker 1: can't talk to you about this. You're not allowed to
Speaker 1: know anything about this. I see this all the time
Speaker 1: when I would engage people in person as a reporter,
Speaker 1: I can't talk to you about that, you know, And
Speaker 1: they would say they had, you know, privileges and government privileges. Well,
Speaker 1: they couldn't say that it was national security because these
Speaker 1: weren't things that were national security. But that's the attitude
Speaker 1: of everybody in government. I can't talk to you about it?
Speaker 1: Why not? Because I know and you know that what
Speaker 1: you're doing is illegal. It's criminal, and that's why you
Speaker 1: don't want to talk about it, but you invoke privilege
Speaker 1: to keep it quiet. The front porch media says smoking
Speaker 1: gun for election fraud is when the winner won't debate.
Speaker 1: That's right, DG eight. Not only did Trump pardon Pollard,
Speaker 1: Mike Huckabee met with him just recently, that's right. And
Speaker 1: the guy who broke her the deal between them was
Speaker 1: Mark Levin's son in law, I think, or son or
Speaker 1: son in law who brought them together. And it's kind
Speaker 1: of interesting when you see Jonathan Pollard say, well, we
Speaker 1: need to do everything, you know, we need to just
Speaker 1: completely destroy Iran, you know, calling basically what Trump repeated, saying,
Speaker 1: I can wipe out their civilization. I can do it
Speaker 1: in no time at all. That's exactly what Jonathan Pollard
Speaker 1: is calling for. He wants to use nuclear weapons. He
Speaker 1: wants to play all these games and say, well, it
Speaker 1: was an unconventional weapon of mass destruction. I'm talking about
Speaker 1: the Japanese options. Wink, wink, nudge, nudge. Well, we know
Speaker 1: what he's talking about and we know that Jonathan Pollard
Speaker 1: was telling this, and then that was picked up and
Speaker 1: repeated and echoed over and over again by Mark Levin,
Speaker 1: by Ben Shapiro, and then Trump started talking about it.
Speaker 1: You know, Trump is not just a guy who is
Speaker 1: on the side of the worst trader arguably that America
Speaker 1: has ever had, but he actually gets his talking points
Speaker 1: from the worst trader America has ever had. Southern Citizen
Speaker 1: says Trump, with the lowest approval rating in history, supposed
Speaker 1: to have influence on endorsements, I call bs. That's another
Speaker 1: good point. Yeah, I missed one that you just scrolled
Speaker 1: up on there, I think. So, yeah, there we go, narroway,
Speaker 1: narrowgate ministries. The question is who will become the next
Speaker 1: target of Trump now that Massy has gone, Who will
Speaker 1: be the next designated pain in the rear to Trump?
Speaker 1: You know, we'll see, we'll see. It's all about Trump.
Speaker 1: Da Massie should run as an independent for that seat.
Speaker 1: That's the worst that can happen. What's the worst that
Speaker 1: can happen both he and gall Rain lose. I agree
Speaker 1: with that. That'd be a great move, except I don't
Speaker 1: think he wants to lose. Twice. I think he's thinking
Speaker 1: about running for president in twenty twenty eight. You've had
Speaker 1: people like Jack Dorsey push that he was hinting at it,
Speaker 1: as in the speech last night, said well what should
Speaker 1: we do about twenty twenty eight, and kind of smiling
Speaker 1: and laughing, inviting the crowd to cheer him on to
Speaker 1: run for president, and they did so. I don't think
Speaker 1: that he wants to do yet another race for that again,
Speaker 1: it'd be another expensive race, and on a national level,
Speaker 1: I think he could compete, but we'd have to wait
Speaker 1: and see. Guard Goldsmith says Trump literally had his friend
Speaker 1: Sheldon five Pollard to Israel on Sheldon's private jet. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's exactly it. You know. You see Mary Maddelson was
Speaker 1: there going down the walkway with him, and the two
Speaker 1: of them kissed the ground right at the feet of Natanya,
Speaker 1: who is disgusting, absolutely disgusting. Pezzo Avante, seventeen seventy six.
Speaker 1: How does anyone collect quote nuclear dust under the rubble?
Speaker 1: These warlives are laughable and gullible. Moggins will swallow it
Speaker 1: all absolutely right. Yeah, the nuclear dust isn't that funny? Yeah,
Speaker 1: but you know that's the talking point they have out there,
Speaker 1: and so, yeah, we have reduced their nuclear program to dust,
Speaker 1: but we still had to attack them because it was
Speaker 1: an adminent threat. You know, what are they going to
Speaker 1: do with that nuclear dust? You're gonna throw it at
Speaker 1: us or something? DG Eight David. Imagine a household over
Speaker 1: a million dollars in debt, the house in ruins, starving kids,
Speaker 1: giving money to people ten miles down the road who
Speaker 1: live in a mansion. That's what foreign aid in America
Speaker 1: amounts to. Yeah, I agree. Yeah, And most of the
Speaker 1: foreign aid that we give and other countries, if it's
Speaker 1: not Israel using it for war, using it to kill
Speaker 1: people and reduce their houses to rubble, in most cases
Speaker 1: that foreign aid goes to the corrupt leadership of these countries.
Speaker 1: Pezzo Avante seventeen seventy six says Gallerin sounds like an
Speaker 1: intestinal disease, the galleryan syndrome. Yeah, it does, doesn't it.
Speaker 2: I liked someone's comment that he has this sort of soulless,
Speaker 2: dead eyed stare that you typically only see from prosperity
Speaker 2: gospel mega preachers.
Speaker 1: Yeah that's right, Yeah, he does, he does have that. Look,
Speaker 1: that's right. Narway narogate ministries. Trump could pull back the
Speaker 1: military today, that will not stop the economic hardship that
Speaker 1: is coming. That's right. They have stored up a lot
Speaker 1: of economic wrath. It's going to take a long time
Speaker 1: to unwind this. He has thrown all kinds of Mikey
Speaker 1: rinches in the supply chain as well as unlike the
Speaker 1: OPEC embargo, there's been a lot of product damage that
Speaker 1: has been done as part of this war. He said,
Speaker 1: the intentional war that he was black mailed to fight
Speaker 1: as grave consequences and I lost. The rest of that kind?
Speaker 1: Is that it there? Where are we? Yeah? That will
Speaker 1: soon be upon all of us. You're absolutely right. Well,
Speaker 1: we're gonna take a quick break. Gerald Clinty is going
Speaker 1: to be joining us. I guess he's not joined yet,
Speaker 1: or has he?
Speaker 2: He's getting there?
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, We're gonna take a quick break, folks,
Speaker 1: and we will be right back. Stay with us and
Speaker 1: we'll talk to Gerald Clinty. He I'm sure is not
Speaker 1: happy about what we see. And the cover of Trends
Speaker 1: Journal talks about Trump's comment last week when he said
Speaker 1: I don't care about americans finances. Now he has doubled
Speaker 1: and tripled down. He's repeated that multiple times, even talking
Speaker 1: about how I don't care about the gas prices. It's
Speaker 1: simply peanuts. He says, right, all you little people, you
Speaker 1: don't matter at all the arrogance, and I can't do it,
Speaker 1: Like Jerald Cliny says, stay tuned. He's going to get
Speaker 1: of us. The arrogance of these white chew boys will
Speaker 1: be right back. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: If you like the Eagles on, it.
Speaker 3: Doesn't the cars and Huey Lewis in the news, they'd
Speaker 3: say the You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio,
Speaker 3: download our app or listen now at APS radio.
Speaker 1: All right, Joining us now is Jerald slenty of Trends Journaling.
Speaker 1: You can find it at trendsjournal dot com and you
Speaker 1: can save ten percent off with a code night. And
Speaker 1: as we showed before the break, this is uh Jerald's
Speaker 1: cover right now for Trends journal Trump going full Marie
Speaker 1: Antoinette and uh, you know, basically, let them eat cake. No, no,
Speaker 1: he wants you to eat peanuts. Actually, he doesn't think
Speaker 1: the massive inflation that he has ignited is anything to
Speaker 1: worry about. He certainly doesn't worried about it. I mean,
Speaker 1: he has inflated his fortune with the double dealing and
Speaker 1: the open in your face corruption so much so in
Speaker 1: just the last few months. He doesn't care at all
Speaker 1: about the price of gas, does he? Gerald?
Speaker 5: Only cares about himself.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 5: I mean, all the facts are there. You know. It's uh,
Speaker 5: you know, we have a These are some of the
Speaker 5: headlines Trumps deal with. His administration also ends his tax audits.
Speaker 1: Yeah, amazing, Street Journal that amazing.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's one thing after another.
Speaker 1: It's beyond Biden, right, this is like Biden's pardon his son,
Speaker 1: you know, for fifteen years everything that he did and
Speaker 1: some other people as well. Trump is going to parton
Speaker 1: his family for all their tax fraud now and into
Speaker 1: the future. You know. The word used by the now
Speaker 1: acting Attorney General who was Trump's personal lawyer, Todd lanch
Speaker 1: Is to say, yeah, forever the irs is banned from
Speaker 1: coming after them and auditing them. And this is happening, Gerald,
Speaker 1: as Trump is a pedal to the metal on setting
Speaker 1: up Palanteer and all these other AI companies to audit
Speaker 1: his enemies and each and every one of us into
Speaker 1: the finest detail we saw this as he weaponized AI
Speaker 1: and the auditing capabilities of that. He got Pulty to
Speaker 1: go back and look at all the real estate transactions
Speaker 1: of his political enemies, the Attorney Journal there in Letitia
Speaker 1: James and also Lisa Cook of the Federal Reserve, go
Speaker 1: back and look at all their real estate dealings and said,
Speaker 1: you know, ten fifteen years ago, you did a loan
Speaker 1: and you said it was going to be for your
Speaker 1: own personal use, and you didn't live in that house,
Speaker 1: So we're going to come after you for a crime.
Speaker 1: This is the type of way that AI is going
Speaker 1: to be used to go after his enemies, to go
Speaker 1: after each end, every one of us, to look at
Speaker 1: everything we did in our life. As I said many times,
Speaker 1: you know Harvey Silverglate who went on to found Fire
Speaker 1: Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, and he wrote the
Speaker 1: book three fallon Needs a Day. He said, the federal
Speaker 1: government has put out so many laws that on average
Speaker 1: he believed that Americans were committing three fall needs a
Speaker 1: day and didn't even know it because the law was
Speaker 1: so complex. So now they've got AI to go back
Speaker 1: and to match you up with all that stuff. If
Speaker 1: you're an enemy of Trump.
Speaker 5: I mean, look what I mean, enemy of Trump? You
Speaker 5: talk about MASSI, I mean this guy. You know, I
Speaker 5: met him. I did a talk for Ron Paul and
Speaker 5: I'm going back like four years ago, and I wish
Speaker 5: guy's terrific, you know, And I kept following him and
Speaker 5: following him. I have to say, there was nobody in
Speaker 5: Congress that I respect more than MASSI nobody, I agree.
Speaker 5: And what how much did they spend to knock him out?
Speaker 1: It's an absurd amount, isn't it.
Speaker 5: Dollars?
Speaker 1: Yeah, when you look at the amount of money that's
Speaker 1: being spent on these elections, it is a metric of
Speaker 1: the corruption that our government has become because people know
Speaker 1: that they can buy whatever they want. If they get
Speaker 1: whatever they want, if they buy a political office. There
Speaker 1: is no return on investment like owning a policy. Is there?
Speaker 5: Again? Look at the money and where the money come
Speaker 5: from a lot of it from Pro Israel.
Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah, That's why I said this is not
Speaker 1: a contest between Trump and Massy. Trump wanted to get
Speaker 1: him out in twenty twenty and he couldn't, and he
Speaker 1: was one to get him out ever since then. But
Speaker 1: it's only after Massey started seriously opposing the war and
Speaker 1: started exposing Epstein. It's only then that Israel came after him. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and they're the ones who came up with the tens
Speaker 1: of millions of dollars. You know, let's take a look
Speaker 1: at this corruption. I hadn't talked about this yet, and
Speaker 1: I think it's interesting to get a context for this,
Speaker 1: because what's the basis of this massive lawsuit. Trump sues
Speaker 1: his own government for ten billion dollars, right, And the
Speaker 1: basis for this was you leaked personal information about me,
Speaker 1: my tax returns and other things like that. And that's
Speaker 1: the basis for this. But you know, there were a
Speaker 1: lot of people that had their she turns leaked. As
Speaker 1: a matter of fact, they were targeted not because of politics,
Speaker 1: but they were targeted by this guy who was a
Speaker 1: contractor to the IRS. He wasn't an IRS employee. His
Speaker 1: name is Charles Little John. And just to remind people,
Speaker 1: he stole these tax records and then released him. He
Speaker 1: did it for thousands of wealthy Americans to show that
Speaker 1: people were not paying taxes. And the names on the
Speaker 1: list are people like Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Warren Buffett,
Speaker 1: Michael Bloomberg, Bill Gates, George Soros, Carl Icon, Rupert Murdoch,
Speaker 1: Mark Zuckerberg, Ken Griffin. Now he revealed things like George
Speaker 1: Soros paid no taxes in three years, Warren Buffett very
Speaker 1: low effective tax rate tenth of one percent, he had,
Speaker 1: Elon Musk paid no taxes in twenty eighteen, Jeff Bezos
Speaker 1: paid no income tax in two thousand and seven, in
Speaker 1: two thousand and eleven. And so he was doing this
Speaker 1: to show how the rich are not paying any taxes.
Speaker 1: That was his political agenda. It wasn't focused clearly on
Speaker 1: one political party or the other. I mean, he's got Bloomberg,
Speaker 1: he's got Soros, he's got Trump. Trump is just one
Speaker 1: of many of them. But it was Trump who came
Speaker 1: up with a ten billion dollar lawsuit totally out of
Speaker 1: any proportion to any possible damage that could have been
Speaker 1: done to him. And with that ten billion dollar lawsuit,
Speaker 1: he then settles, using his employee, Todd Lanch, who's been
Speaker 1: his personal lawyer now his attorney general. He says, Oh, okay,
Speaker 1: I tell you what. We'll settle for about two billion dollars.
Speaker 1: How about that? And it's an outrage And what's even
Speaker 1: worse about this Gerald. Is he set up this slush
Speaker 1: fund where they're going to have a committee of people,
Speaker 1: a committee that will be answerable to Donald Trump. I mean,
Speaker 1: it looks just like the Board of Peace so called,
Speaker 1: and they get to pick the people on it. They
Speaker 1: are going to not be held accountable. I have to
Speaker 1: report to anybody other than him, and he can remove
Speaker 1: them for anything that he wants. And they'll be deciding
Speaker 1: who gets the money out of this nearly two billion
Speaker 1: dollar fund. Isn't that amazing?
Speaker 5: Again, there's an article in this week's Treads Journal that
Speaker 5: Judge Andrew Napolitano wrote about just what you're talking about,
Speaker 5: and how this guy that released it, by the way,
Speaker 5: they put him in jail for four years for doing that. Yeah,
Speaker 5: and again as there used to be this Italian guy.
Speaker 5: So you can't call me an anti Italian because I
Speaker 5: didn't like Mussolini. Oh but if you ain't genocide, you're
Speaker 5: an anti Semite, you know.
Speaker 9: Yeah?
Speaker 5: It anyway, the merger's state in corporate power is as fascism.
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 5: His definition right in front of everybody's eyes, this BS deal.
Speaker 5: And you're the clown boy that you mentioned, that's the
Speaker 5: the irs head over there, that used to be Trump's lawyer,
Speaker 5: and now he's making this decision.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, he's at the he's the attorney general, and
Speaker 1: he's the one who wrote this one page thing giving
Speaker 1: the immunity from any I R. S audits run by
Speaker 1: his former lawyer. It's just amazing.
Speaker 5: Todd Blanche.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: In the documents signed by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche,
Speaker 5: the government said it would it is in quotes, capital
Speaker 5: letters forever barred, all caps and all caps precluded all
Speaker 5: caps in quotes from purchasing certain claims against Trump, his
Speaker 5: business and family members.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: The agreement specifically blocks the government from taking any action
Speaker 5: regarding tax returns that already been filed. Hey but you,
Speaker 5: every one of your plantation workers of Slaveland, you pay
Speaker 5: your taxes right again, These little arrogant pieces of scum,
Speaker 5: these billionaires that give nothing for peace, nothing to be
Speaker 5: the people, pay no taxes at all. But you don't pay.
Speaker 5: Oh my god, do they come after you?
Speaker 1: Yeah? That's right. Yeah, as Lance says, it's good to
Speaker 1: be the king, right, Yes, thank the mel Brooks. It
Speaker 1: really is. I mean, he's feeling it right now. And
Speaker 1: I think what Blanche did was kind of a preview
Speaker 1: for what he's going to do for Gallainne Maxwell. I
Speaker 1: don't think it's a matter of if she's going to
Speaker 1: get a pardon, it's just when she's going to get
Speaker 1: a pardon. And he was the guy who did this long,
Speaker 1: extensive interview with her in prison and the result of
Speaker 1: that was she got sent to a club fed where
Speaker 1: she had all kinds of privileges, very easy time that
Speaker 1: she's doing. And so you know, he's the guy, he's
Speaker 1: the fixer, he's the guy who's taken what was his name,
Speaker 1: the lawyer Cohen was it Cohen or something who turned
Speaker 1: on Trump. But yeah, it's going to be that type
Speaker 1: of thing you know he had. He always has a
Speaker 1: lawyer who goes around and does the payoff and does
Speaker 1: the dirty work for this stuff. As Mona Sharon, who
Speaker 1: was a former speechwriter for Reagan said, how corrupt is Trump? Well,
Speaker 1: here's the numbers. He is the swampiest swamp creature ever. Ye,
Speaker 1: she nailed it. I thought it was funny, she said.
Speaker 1: I don't like to write about the same thing twice
Speaker 1: in a row. But the latest revelation of Trump's wanton,
Speaker 1: shameless profiteering from the White House cannot go unremarked. She said,
Speaker 1: this is a Trump era, which means that if you blink,
Speaker 1: you'll miss another shattering example of unabashed corruption and starts.
Speaker 5: How about the numbers coming out to people shorting the
Speaker 5: oil futures just before he makes a comment that, oh,
Speaker 5: we've got to seize fire now, and we'll do it
Speaker 5: forty eight hours. You got forty eight hours a run,
Speaker 5: I mean forty hours. You don't bring a part the
Speaker 5: rule a run. Oh he did that on a weekend. Yeah,
Speaker 5: minx before the equity markets opened up. Hey, hey, we're
Speaker 5: gonna give you another No, no, we got another ten
Speaker 5: days A ride, a ride, Everything's good. Look what just
Speaker 5: happened yesterday? By the way, going back to this Massy again,
Speaker 5: he he he's the only I am. This is very important.
Speaker 5: This guy was very popular in Kentucky.
Speaker 1: Mm hmmm.
Speaker 5: That he lost this is showing you the true power
Speaker 5: behind this Trump administration. There is nobody more more popular
Speaker 5: as a Republican that spoke out against war and other
Speaker 5: criminalities than Massy.
Speaker 1: No, that's right.
Speaker 5: Yeah, And that he lost this race is showing you
Speaker 5: really how powerful this Trump administration is.
Speaker 1: In corrupt I don't believe.
Speaker 5: The vote from your eyes, yeah, I.
Speaker 1: Don't believe the electionary turns quite frankly, because you look
Speaker 1: at what's happening. We're supposed to believe that he's ahead
Speaker 1: until the last minute, and then all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: the polls flipped. And when you look at the vote totals,
Speaker 1: as some people point out, Massy's vote totals are up
Speaker 1: by nineteen percent, but the overall votes are up by
Speaker 1: three hundred and fifty six percent. So you've got all
Speaker 1: these we're supposed to believe, according to some of these
Speaker 1: earlier polls that for the under fifty five, Massy had
Speaker 1: anywhere from a reported yesterday. I think it's something from
Speaker 1: seventeen point lead to a fifty six point lead, and
Speaker 1: then when you get to fifty five and older, suddenly
Speaker 1: starts to go the other way, but not by as
Speaker 1: large a margin, but were so. And when we talked
Speaker 1: about that, and Lance pointed out, he said, well, it's
Speaker 1: where these people are getting their news. You know that
Speaker 1: generation is getting their news from Fox News. But I
Speaker 1: think that when you look at this, if it goes
Speaker 1: up by three hundred and fifty six percent, as guard
Speaker 1: Goldsmith commented. He said, so we're supposed to believe that
Speaker 1: all these boomers who are getting their news from Fox
Speaker 1: never participated, but they all came out of their caves
Speaker 1: to vote for Ed goll Ryan. I don't buy that.
Speaker 1: I think all this stuff.
Speaker 5: Is regardless of the why. It's all I'm saying to
Speaker 5: show the power. Oh I agree, yeah, getting why it happened?
Speaker 5: What's this or what's that? It's the end result.
Speaker 1: That's right. The power to read the elections and to
Speaker 1: get away with it is the way I see it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, And I'm saying the power of this. Number two.
Speaker 5: They keep coming out about how low is popularity rating is?
Speaker 5: It was about thirty five seven percent?
Speaker 1: Yeah all right, Yeah, what's.
Speaker 5: That the clown over there, Howard Mertz over there in Germany?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, Fred Mertz?
Speaker 5: Yeah what is it about? Fifteen sixteen percent?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 5: Yeah, that little Cotson Macron over there in France with
Speaker 5: a peck of the size of his pencil if he
Speaker 5: has one, what is his around twelve thirteen fourteen percent?
Speaker 5: Little nobody starmer over there in the UK? Yeah, same thing,
Speaker 5: under twenty percent popularity.
Speaker 1: Rating and they stay then.
Speaker 5: Yeah, but I'm just saying, look, how low their popularity
Speaker 5: ratings are. They're still in office and you got Trump
Speaker 5: double that more.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 5: So I'm telling you, as much as there's that we hate,
Speaker 5: Trump's there, this guy knows how to keep this game going.
Speaker 5: And so in the midterm elections come up six months away.
Speaker 5: Anything it happened between now and then, and he will do
Speaker 5: everything he can to have all the POWI he can.
Speaker 1: I agree, yeah, I agree, they know how to rig
Speaker 1: the elections. I mean, we go back and link at
Speaker 1: what happened in France. For example, Gerald the Nationalist party
Speaker 1: that was there, it was rising up first. You saw
Speaker 1: it reflected in the European Union parliament races, and they
Speaker 1: had a major victory there. That them worried about their
Speaker 1: national elections in France, and they did better in the
Speaker 1: first round of their elections, and then when they get
Speaker 1: to run off, their popularity actually went up, but their
Speaker 1: vote totals went down. And the reason that happened was
Speaker 1: because Macron and his people did a deal with every
Speaker 1: other political party. They said, I tell you what, whenever
Speaker 1: we'll take a look at it, whichever one of us
Speaker 1: is ahead, we'll stay in the race. But all the
Speaker 1: other political parties will drop out so that Pens party
Speaker 1: can't get a majority. And that's what they did. They
Speaker 1: all call us during they conspired together to make sure
Speaker 1: that one political party couldn't succeed. They're doing the same
Speaker 1: type of stuff in Germany with AfD, and so you
Speaker 1: see this over and over. They know how to play
Speaker 1: the levers of power. They have rigged the game. And
Speaker 1: I think part of what you're seeing here, and it
Speaker 1: may be part of what they're trying to do, is
Speaker 1: the jerrymandering that is going on. They're doing that like
Speaker 1: they have never done it before. And I said, whenever
Speaker 1: I talk about the elections, I said, you know, when
Speaker 1: you even before you count the votes, if they're able
Speaker 1: to pick who's going to be on the ballot, if
Speaker 1: they're able to shut down the debates, or if they
Speaker 1: have debates, pick who's going to be able to participate
Speaker 1: in them, keeping out any independence and third parties. If
Speaker 1: they control all of that stuff, and they do with
Speaker 1: a jerrymandering, then you don't really have a chance. It's
Speaker 1: like a jury trial anymore.
Speaker 5: Again, it's what they spent thirty two million day to
Speaker 5: wipe out. Men see, and you can't you don't have
Speaker 5: any money, you don't run. It's again, this is fascism.
Speaker 5: It's the merger of state and corporate powers. Again, we
Speaker 5: have all the articles in the Trends Journal, one after another,
Speaker 5: week after week. Matter of fact, this one in here too.
Speaker 1: That was when I was running for office, or I
Speaker 1: was working with a libertary party. That would be always
Speaker 1: the first and usually is the last question. Because we
Speaker 1: didn't have anyone. They say how much money have you got?
Speaker 1: That'd be the first thing to report. If they talk
Speaker 1: to us, I'd say, how much money have you got?
Speaker 1: Your money? I got some ideas, but oh, we're not
Speaker 1: interested yet.
Speaker 5: This is one of your articles in this week's Trends Journal. Fascism.
Speaker 5: Venture capital firm with close ties to Trump sees itself
Speaker 5: as election kingmaker. Right, yeah, week after week we've been
Speaker 5: putting this data in there. This isn't a republic, it's fascism,
Speaker 5: the merger of state and corporate powers. And again this
Speaker 5: is it's serious, and and the whole game is being rigged.
Speaker 5: Look what's going on. Before I went on the air,
Speaker 5: I looked at the the oil prices. Bread crude is
Speaker 5: down over four dollars a barrel. And you know why,
Speaker 5: Trump says he hopes to end conflict in Iran quote
Speaker 5: very quickly. Number one, it's not a conflict. It's a war.
Speaker 5: So stop calling it a conflict. Grow up. No, you
Speaker 5: got to call it a conflict because the president says,
Speaker 5: it's not a war. Okay, I'll be good. I'll be good.
Speaker 5: It's not a war.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 5: Number two, he says he's going to end it very quickly. Right,
Speaker 5: he says, We're going to end this war very quickly.
Speaker 5: They want to make a deal so badly. They're tired
Speaker 5: of this should have happened for forty seven years. Somebody
Speaker 5: should have done something about it, and it's gonna happen,
Speaker 5: and it's going to happen fast, and you're going to
Speaker 5: see oil prices plummet.
Speaker 1: H all right, And yeah, he is the master of deception.
Speaker 1: And as I said, you know the problem with liars
Speaker 1: is they don't have a good enough memory to get
Speaker 1: away with it. His memory is so bad he lies
Speaker 1: in the same sentence, gets away with it. Yeah he does.
Speaker 5: Yeah, he does, gets away with it. Where is the him?
Speaker 5: This is part of your economic update March fourth, Pete
Speaker 5: hesit or hegg shit told reporters that the Iranians are
Speaker 5: quote toast and they know it. Watch six. Trump posted
Speaker 5: on social social life social quote there will be no
Speaker 5: deal with Iran except unconditional surrender. March eleventh, Trump said
Speaker 5: us won the war. Quote you never like to say
Speaker 5: too early. You won. We won in the first How
Speaker 5: it was over, We got the all right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, they've got no navy, they've got no air force.
Speaker 1: Forget about the fact they never had an air force
Speaker 1: or navy and they've gotten one now. Except they're still
Speaker 1: able to launch at tax even if they say that
Speaker 1: they have obliterated their ability to do that as soon
Speaker 1: as they say that there's a tax launched. I mean,
Speaker 1: they just and they never are held accountable for anything,
Speaker 1: as you point out, whatever they say.
Speaker 5: March twenty sixth, Trump told the cabinet meeting Iran was
Speaker 5: quote defeated. They can't make a comeback. We won this war.
Speaker 5: This war has been won. Remember this is the same
Speaker 5: truck that said, how long is it woken? Oh? Four
Speaker 5: five weeks? Four five weeks? What are we going into?
Speaker 5: Watch the twelfth? Twelve week? Mm hmmm, all right, then
Speaker 5: you got again. He keeps making these statements and the
Speaker 5: facts show that before he made these statements a number
Speaker 5: of times people shorted the futures markets in.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, well, oh yeah, absolutely, yeah. Yeah. That's one
Speaker 1: of the things that Mona Charon talks about. She talks
Speaker 1: about that, and she talks about, well, let's take a
Speaker 1: look at the massive conflict of interest. You know, he
Speaker 1: buys a bunch of stock in Nvidia just a few
Speaker 1: days before he says, okay, now you can sell all
Speaker 1: your chips to China, and he does the same thing
Speaker 1: with company after company. H He's got a big contract
Speaker 1: he's going to award to Palenteer, So he buys a
Speaker 1: bunch of stock and Palaeer and then announces it. It's
Speaker 1: the most obvious conflict of interest and corruption you could
Speaker 1: possibly have. And then when you look at this deal
Speaker 1: that he has set up for two billion dollars that
Speaker 1: he's going to hand to himself again, he is setting
Speaker 1: on both sides of the table in this deal. He
Speaker 1: brings a lawsuit and then he tells his employee Todd Blanche,
Speaker 1: settle and give me a two billion instead of the
Speaker 1: ten billion I'm asking for. It's just unbelievable, isn't it.
Speaker 1: I just I'm looking at it and it's like, what
Speaker 1: kind of a universe am I living in there? It's
Speaker 1: like the Twighlight Zone, it really is.
Speaker 5: Yeah, Eric Chump joins trip to China while company with
Speaker 5: links to him and Trump family seek deal with Chinese
Speaker 5: chip maker. Mm hm, that's an article in your Trench's
Speaker 5: journalist week. Company tied to Trump's son wants more funding
Speaker 5: for more mind projects. All right, yeah, Trump Junior tries
Speaker 5: to cash in on patriotic capitalism one after another. Patriotic capitalism.
Speaker 1: Do you believe this war?
Speaker 5: So this is serious because they're going to keep doing
Speaker 5: this again. Trump threatens Iran with big hit if deal
Speaker 5: isn't reached in coming days.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we got another three years of this stuff, you know,
Speaker 1: I know how much.
Speaker 5: That's what he says. Denny reverses it. And the markets.
Speaker 5: He's doing everything he can to keep the equity markets
Speaker 5: up and oil prices down. And the story. They're playing
Speaker 5: the game since the war began. On February twenty eighth,
Speaker 5: and again, Israeli media is reporting that Israel expecting and
Speaker 5: planning to rejoin US strikes on Iran, According to Israel's
Speaker 5: Channel to twelve, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin net Yahoo convened
Speaker 5: a meeting of his top military officials on Monday night
Speaker 5: to discuss the possibility, and he has canceled court testimony
Speaker 5: schedule for Wednesday with no opposition from the prosecution.
Speaker 1: I got a comment here from a high boost he says,
Speaker 1: David Trump said this will be the most transparent administration ever.
Speaker 1: He wasn't lying. They are transparently corrupt in front of
Speaker 1: everybody's face, like nobody else before. That's absolutely true.
Speaker 5: Isn't it perfectly said.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's just it's crazy. And I imagine what Mona
Speaker 1: Cherian had written about the day before all this stuff
Speaker 1: about the slush fund hit the seventeen seventy six slush fund,
Speaker 1: was the fact that he had traded thirty seven hundred
Speaker 1: times last quarter, and he's doing forty trades a day
Speaker 1: Gerald and all these people on Wall Street are saying,
Speaker 1: what in the world does he do? This is a
Speaker 1: guy who is tweeting around the clock and trading stocks
Speaker 1: around the clock. He's either got an army of clones
Speaker 1: that are out there doing this or he's not doing
Speaker 1: much of anything else, is he? But it is truly
Speaker 1: amazing that he's turning the stuff this much. But when
Speaker 1: you look at the fact of what the stocks are
Speaker 1: that he's buying, he's buying these stocks and then selling
Speaker 1: them after, you know, doing a pumping dump. So I'm
Speaker 1: going to buy it. And you know the old expression
Speaker 1: is you buy on rumor and then you sell on news. Right, Well,
Speaker 1: he buys because he knows what the news is going
Speaker 1: to be the next day, and then when the news
Speaker 1: comes out, he sells it. And I bet if you
Speaker 1: went back, somebody is probably going to do this and
Speaker 1: time this up with his announcements for Pallanteer and for
Speaker 1: Nvidia and other companies like that. Probably go back and
Speaker 1: look at this in terms of a timeline and see
Speaker 1: that's exactly what this crook is doing. It disgusts me,
Speaker 1: absolutely disgusting. She points, yeah, she points that. She said,
Speaker 1: if you go back to twenty fifteen, the US wasn't clean,
Speaker 1: but it was relatively clean. There's an organization that does
Speaker 1: a rating for this. It's called Transparency International. Again, there's
Speaker 1: our transparency and they rate all the countries based on
Speaker 1: whether or not they are clean or corrupt. In twenty fifteen,
Speaker 1: we got a score of seventy six which isn't all
Speaker 1: that great, but it got us into sixteenth place in
Speaker 1: terms of the cleanest governments. We have now dropped to
Speaker 1: sixth now dropped to sixty fourth. Wow, and falling fast.
Speaker 1: That's what that group, Transparency International, and they go through
Speaker 1: in their rate countries based on corruption. You know, it's
Speaker 1: kind of interesting. Jim Rodgers, I remember a book that
Speaker 1: he wrote back in the seventies called International Biker I
Speaker 1: think or something like that, and he and his girlfriend
Speaker 1: went around the world on a bike. You know, of
Speaker 1: course they had to take a boat over a lot
Speaker 1: of its water, but they would just ride their motorcycle
Speaker 1: through different countries. And he said, I found out pretty
Speaker 1: quickly that if you look at the difference between the
Speaker 1: official exchange rate and the black market exchange rate. He said,
Speaker 1: that kind of became a metric for the corruption in
Speaker 1: that country, which I thought was kind of an interesting thing.
Speaker 1: But here here's another metric from Transparency International. And we
Speaker 1: were falling fast, dropping like a rock.
Speaker 5: It's again, it's it's one president after another. Is look
Speaker 5: at Bill Clinton, you know, I mean, you know, doing
Speaker 5: a way with so many antitrust lawsestigal act on and on.
Speaker 1: They keep building on each other, and it is really
Speaker 1: kind of like, there's another one.
Speaker 5: Here's one that nobody talks about. Again, I can't stand
Speaker 5: any of them. To me, it's a crime syndicate. Yeah,
Speaker 5: and there's this guy, the nobel piece of crap prize
Speaker 5: winner who led his way into office, Barack Obama. As
Speaker 5: soon as he got into office, the Afghan troops surge
Speaker 5: or the guy the little guy that couldn't fight is
Speaker 5: nothing of a nothing of a boy like the rest
Speaker 5: of them that loved war, that never fight. I want
Speaker 5: that guy kadad for you out of the oh the
Speaker 5: guy quoted in the book Double Down. I'm really good
Speaker 5: at killing people that light his way into office as
Speaker 5: a peace president. You ready for this one? The woman
Speaker 5: mentioned twenty fifteen. Let's go to twenty sixteen. What did
Speaker 5: Obama do? Once upon a time, the energy companies, the
Speaker 5: gas and oil companies, were not allowed to export our
Speaker 5: oil in America. It's the oil of the American people,
Speaker 5: it's our country. Obama did away with it and allowed
Speaker 5: them to export.
Speaker 1: We'll be careful, you see, be careful when you say
Speaker 1: stuff like that, Joel, because that got most of I
Speaker 1: killed and thrown out in Iran. When he said, hey,
Speaker 1: that's Iranian oil and you can't tell us what to
Speaker 1: do with it. That's when the CIA Masad threw him
Speaker 1: out and put in the shaw that's right.
Speaker 5: Yeah, that was Mozadggmuhammad Mosadag nineteen fifty three.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so be careful about that. Yep, they could get you,
Speaker 1: Jill again.
Speaker 5: I wrote about that in my book tread Tracking Fall
Speaker 5: better than Mega tread Sty magazine. The Ranian conflict broke out,
Speaker 5: That's what I became a political atheist because what you
Speaker 5: just said about Mosadegg ninety nine point nine nine nine
Speaker 5: percent of the people never heard of.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Every time Trump and these Zionists talk about
Speaker 1: this stuff, it's always forty seven, forty seven, forty seven.
Speaker 1: I said, they need the eighty six, this forty seven. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't want to hear anymore about forty seven years
Speaker 1: of Iran. Our history with Iran goes back seventy three years,
Speaker 1: goes back to the overthrow of their elected government, our
Speaker 1: imposition of a tutalitarian king and the training of his
Speaker 1: secret police to ferret out in the opposition, torture and
Speaker 1: kill them.
Speaker 5: Yep, the Savak secret police that made the SS look good. Yeah,
Speaker 5: And they didn't release the full data until around two
Speaker 5: thy thirteen. Of the telegrams that went from Winston Churchill,
Speaker 5: a fat, little, ugly, stupid slob drunk yeah, who gave
Speaker 5: us world War One and World War two that people
Speaker 5: look up to just like they look up to the
Speaker 5: other clowns. And Kermit Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt's grandson, telegrams from
Speaker 5: Churchill to Roosevelt, how we have to overth throw Moza
Speaker 5: Dag to get the oil back. Basically, the oil does
Speaker 5: not belonged to the Iranian people. It belongs to Anglo
Speaker 5: Iranian oil better known today's BP and standard oil, better
Speaker 5: known today's exonomobile. I write about it. I wrote about
Speaker 5: it in this book. So going back, no one's talking
Speaker 5: about how Obama a little boy of nothing that's worth
Speaker 5: while about fifty sixty million dollars now, yeah, all right,
Speaker 5: How he was the one that did away with the
Speaker 5: regulation that the oil and gas in the United States
Speaker 5: should not be sold outside the country. So could you
Speaker 5: imagine if that law was still in place, or the
Speaker 5: average price of a gallon of gas now by four
Speaker 5: dollars and fifty five cents that average price, what was it?
Speaker 5: What was it the day before Trump launched the Iron War?
Speaker 5: Two dollars in ninety one. Since all right, yep, from
Speaker 5: March to May, from two dollars in ninety one to
Speaker 5: four fifty five. Yeah, we said, prices have gone up
Speaker 5: sixty percent.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and airline fuel is even worse than the diesel,
Speaker 1: you know. And so you look at this, and they
Speaker 1: just did a week or two ago. They had an
Speaker 1: interview with the Chevron CEO and they were talking about
Speaker 1: that very thing, and he said, well, you know, it's
Speaker 1: a global market. We're going to solve this everywhere. And
Speaker 1: that's one of the reasons why when you look at
Speaker 1: what happened with the seventy three oil embargo, as I've
Speaker 1: said many times, that was only against the United States,
Speaker 1: and it was only we only got fifteen percent of
Speaker 1: our oil supply of one country from the Arab countries
Speaker 1: that put the embargoing. But look at the economic disaster
Speaker 1: that came from that. And this is much bigger. What
Speaker 1: is happening in the straight orf from news is much
Speaker 1: bigger than that.
Speaker 5: And no, this is a global crisis. This thing again, Yeah,
Speaker 5: it's in your your trends Journal in Your Your Turns
Speaker 5: on a geopolitic political economic Front special report. Iran war
Speaker 5: disrupts oil supply World's economy on borrowed time. That's that's
Speaker 5: what they're coming out with as a massive oil crisis looms.
Speaker 5: Iran war turns oil glut into a deficit. That's according
Speaker 5: to the International Energy Agency, oil reserves dwindling at a
Speaker 5: record pace. All right, it's one after another, the damage
Speaker 5: that this thing has done. And by the way, one
Speaker 5: of the reasons why goal prices are going down. We're
Speaker 5: going gone down. Here, it's in your We find it
Speaker 5: here in our economic update. To hear the exact wording.
Speaker 5: Know I did with it here, but Turkey here it is.
Speaker 5: Are you ready again? The primary reason for the sol
Speaker 5: off are that nation's economies are in steep decline as
Speaker 5: a result of Iran War, and nations such as Turkey
Speaker 5: and Russia are selling gold to help pay off their
Speaker 5: debt load and cover their losses. It's reported that Russia's
Speaker 5: sold twenty two tons of gold through April, while Turkey
Speaker 5: sold sixty tons in March to shore up its fiscal needs.
Speaker 5: And we have a whole article about Turkey's hiking their
Speaker 5: central bank is hiking it's interest straight to fight inflation.
Speaker 1: And India as well because India has got currency issues
Speaker 1: with this, and part of it is tied to the
Speaker 1: price of oil that they have to import. So this
Speaker 1: is having massive effects in so many different areas. I
Speaker 1: mean food in terms of fertilizer and other things like
Speaker 1: that we got. This is building up for a famine,
Speaker 1: even supplies that are going to be affected in terms
Speaker 1: of things like helium used in semiconductor manufacturing. So there's
Speaker 1: not just the oil, but the oil is so foundational.
Speaker 1: We all saw this back in the nineteen seventies, didn't
Speaker 1: It is kind of a slow moving juggernaut of destruction.
Speaker 1: It takes it a while to get going, and it
Speaker 1: has a lot of inertia in it. And once this
Speaker 1: thing gets going, you can't just stop it. You know.
Speaker 1: It's just like the Titanic. You might see the iceberg
Speaker 1: over there, but you can't turn the ship fast enough
Speaker 1: because of the momentum that you've got going.
Speaker 5: Perfectly perfly illustrated. And again we're going to have what
Speaker 5: we call dragflation. Because I mentioned what's going on in Turkey.
Speaker 5: I'm just mentioned Turkey, but other nations are raising their
Speaker 5: interest rates because of inflation, so that's going to bring
Speaker 5: down their economy. But it's not going to stop the
Speaker 5: inflation that's being caused by this oil crisis and continuing war.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's right, I said.
Speaker 5: So they changed stagflation. No, it's not going to be stagnant,
Speaker 5: it's going to be declining. Yeah, it's going to be dragflation.
Speaker 1: And you've said this for quite some time, based on
Speaker 1: the fundamentals of quantitative easing and easy money and all
Speaker 1: the rest of the stuff that was baked in after
Speaker 1: the last economic crisis where they pumped and dumped everything.
Speaker 1: So the trends that are there, these fundamental issues are
Speaker 1: you know, forget about what Trump is saying on any
Speaker 1: given day, giving people a false hope about this or that,
Speaker 1: and then changing it the next day, you know, just
Speaker 1: saying he changes the teriffs, he changes his war prognostications,
Speaker 1: and so forth. But it's the fundamental trends in terms
Speaker 1: of what they have done and what they've been doing
Speaker 1: and how they're accelerating that that people need to take
Speaker 1: a look at.
Speaker 5: You know, we all due respect, you said he's changing
Speaker 5: it day after day. That's not true. He's changing it
Speaker 5: minute after minute. Yeah, yesterday, really yesterday he said, you know,
Speaker 5: we're going to have a piece deal. Then he comes up,
Speaker 5: you don't do one that we're going to attack you. Yeah,
Speaker 5: I mean every day, every day, minute by minute, by
Speaker 5: minute by minute, you know, year, month after month, day
Speaker 5: after day, week after week, minute, it keeps changing it
Speaker 5: and changing it. Now, this is serious. We are in
Speaker 5: the most serious times of our lifetime.
Speaker 1: I agree. I agree. Yeah, we talk about the fourth
Speaker 1: turning and the timing, and how about every eighty years
Speaker 1: we have this massive economic issue. People lose trust in
Speaker 1: their institutions. Usually the fourth turning begins, the fourth generation
Speaker 1: begins with people moving against these institutions. There's a financial crisis,
Speaker 1: usually followed by war. The previous one was a great
Speaker 1: depression of World War two. And I said, you know,
Speaker 1: Trump really is kind of a one man fourth turning.
Speaker 1: He has eroded everybody's trust and everything and during the
Speaker 1: best he can to who wrote that he is dragging
Speaker 1: us into war, famine, pestilence, depression, all of this stuff.
Speaker 1: He can do it all by himself, isn't it amazing? Yeah,
Speaker 1: It's like he's got a bud.
Speaker 5: Here's your beginning of the economic update, you said that
Speaker 5: Trump again, as we have detailed and continue to detail
Speaker 5: by pure facts and indisputable data, the legal Iron War,
Speaker 5: launched on twenty eighth February by just two politicians, President
Speaker 5: Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin at Yahoo, has
Speaker 5: inflicted severe socioeconomic and geopolitical damage across the globe. Are
Speaker 5: you got it?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 5: To god too, arrogant, arrogant pieces of scum. Two guys
Speaker 5: have done this to the whole world. Yep, two guys,
Speaker 5: that's right.
Speaker 1: And they're kind of mirror images of each other. When
Speaker 1: you look at Netanyahu, look at all the corruption charges
Speaker 1: that he's fighting, Look at how he has tried to
Speaker 1: rig the political system and successfully doing it. You know,
Speaker 1: just like Donald Trump. He has rigged the political system
Speaker 1: of Israel. He's got a lot of opponents who've been
Speaker 1: coming after him for obvious corruption, and yet he keeps
Speaker 1: going and going and going. They're like the ever ready money.
Speaker 1: You know, both these guys, this is.
Speaker 5: Here, that two people. Where the hell are the people
Speaker 5: of the world?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 5: Could you be so gountless to let two people do
Speaker 5: this to you?
Speaker 1: Yep? Yeah, I agree, I agree.
Speaker 5: And then talk about corruption. Hey, how about both of
Speaker 5: these guys kids, right, Oh, whose kids live in the
Speaker 5: life of the high life out of Miami. Well, some
Speaker 5: kids are making billions of dollars. Hey, you're not.
Speaker 1: Going to war mm hmmmm hmm. Yeah, that's what mona
Speaker 1: chair points out. And he says, hey, I'm uh, I'm
Speaker 1: not putting stuff in a blind trust. I let my
Speaker 1: family do this. And she said, that is the very
Speaker 1: definition of conflict of interest. It is not you haven't
Speaker 1: escaped the conflict of interest because you got your family
Speaker 1: doing this. It is a crime family. And you look at.
Speaker 5: People are going broke in front of everybody's eyes. The
Speaker 5: country's turning to crap. The roads, roads joke ye over
Speaker 5: the place, crap a stupid old thing, the subway in
Speaker 5: New York at night in Calcutter, go to go to Shina.
Speaker 5: Poooo mm hmm. More money for wart you buy hairf
Speaker 5: a jillion dollars, I said, got war his February. No,
Speaker 5: I did another hair for jillion. Right, I'm full of crap.
Speaker 5: I'm club as we say, it's not bullshit, it's trump shit.
Speaker 5: You got to get rid of the word bull out
Speaker 5: of it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah, and he doesn't even try to hide
Speaker 1: it anymore. He doesn't even try to hide his elitist
Speaker 1: contempt for Americans. I don't care about American finances. You know.
Speaker 1: The other thing that was interesting about that, besides the
Speaker 1: outrageous contempt Gerald, was the fact that he's saying, well,
Speaker 1: you know, we've I don't know, if we go to
Speaker 1: get this nuclear dust, whatever that's supposed to be, we
Speaker 1: can do it. We don't have to do it. It basically
Speaker 1: be a PR thing. But he's going to kill people.
Speaker 1: He's going to hold everything up for a PR stunt.
Speaker 1: And at the same time, his whole quote unquote conflict
Speaker 1: that he wants to call it, his whole war that
Speaker 1: he started, is based on the fact that there was
Speaker 1: an eminent threat. If it's nothing but dust, and as
Speaker 1: he points out, we've got cameras on that and nobody's
Speaker 1: going near it, well, then how can you sell the
Speaker 1: idea that there was an eminent threat. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: all just contradictory line. He's contradicted by the actions that
Speaker 1: are happening. He contradicts himself with his own words. As
Speaker 1: you point out several times that same day. You know,
Speaker 1: it's amazing.
Speaker 5: Trump said on Monday that he ended plans for a
Speaker 5: schedule attack of Iran tomorrow because leaders of Qatar, Saudi Arabia,
Speaker 5: and United Arab Emirates asked him to do so. And
Speaker 5: then we write before he spewed us out. On Monday,
Speaker 5: Trump told Axios, quote, the clock is ticking for Ran
Speaker 5: and warn that if they don't agree to his deal quote,
Speaker 5: they're going to be hit much harder. What same day.
Speaker 1: Yeah, earlier in the day.
Speaker 5: He told The New York Post Iran knows quote what's
Speaker 5: going to be happening soon, And later in the day
Speaker 5: he said at the White House, We're getting ready to
Speaker 5: do a very major attack tomorrow. Right as I said
Speaker 5: to you. No, not day after day, minute by minute.
Speaker 5: He keeps lying, yeah, that's right, that's right.
Speaker 1: Truly is amazing, and it's so sad to see this happening
Speaker 1: to our country. It is turning into a banana republic
Speaker 1: right before our eyes. And I guess we need to
Speaker 1: call the GOP start calling them banana republicans. The problem
Speaker 1: is we're not going to be able to afford any bananas.
Speaker 1: Because he doesn't like getting stuff from foreign countries. It
Speaker 1: doesn't matter we don't grow bananas here. I'm going to
Speaker 1: punish the people who sell you the bananas. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much for joining us, Jeryl Slinty. And again, the
Speaker 1: Code Night will get you ten percent off of Trends Journal.
Speaker 1: It is an excellent publication. It is vital to be
Speaker 1: informed because there are things that you can do as
Speaker 1: an individual to try to mitigate some of this destruction.
Speaker 1: We can't escape it totally, and we can't keep these
Speaker 1: people accountable as we see yesterday, but there are some
Speaker 1: things that you can do if you know what is happening,
Speaker 1: and you see some of the opportunities, you know why
Speaker 1: gold is moving the way that it is moving, and
Speaker 1: that type of thing. So again, thank you so much
Speaker 1: for joining us, Jeryl Slinty, Trends Journal dot com. Don't
Speaker 1: forget the Code Night. Thank you. Thank you. The common man.
Speaker 1: They created common Core and dumb down our children. They
Speaker 1: created common past track and control us their Commons project
Speaker 1: to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 1: They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 1: each of us has worth and dignity created in the
Speaker 1: image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 1: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 1: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 1: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 1: time to turn that around and expose what they want
Speaker 1: to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
Speaker 1: at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
Speaker 1: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 1: keep us in your prayers. The Davidnightshow dot com