Speaker 1: So I want you to imagine waking up tomorrow morning.
Speaker 1: You know, you're pouring your coffee, You're looking out the
Speaker 1: kitchen window, and you suddenly realize that the timeline of
Speaker 1: humanity literally split last year.
Speaker 2: Oh wow, Yeah, that is a wild thought to start
Speaker 2: the day with.
Speaker 1: Right. I mean, you are standing in the exact same kitchen,
Speaker 1: You're looking at the exact same street, but the underlying
Speaker 1: fabric of the reality you are occupying is now on
Speaker 1: a completely divergent trajectory from like the person walking their
Speaker 1: dog right outside on the sidewalk.
Speaker 2: It really forces a I mean a complete system overrat
Speaker 2: of the logical mind. We are so deeply conditioned to
Speaker 2: view history and by extension, the future as this singular,
Speaker 2: monolithic track.
Speaker 1: Yeah, like we're all on the same train going the
Speaker 1: same station, exactly.
Speaker 2: Yeah. The premise that this crack has not just branched,
Speaker 2: but fundamentally bifurcated into entirely different vibrational realities, well, it
Speaker 2: shatters that illusion of consensus reality is deeply unsettling on
Speaker 2: a neurological level. Honestly, it also strips away the fatalism
Speaker 2: we usually apply to global events. It offers a profoundly
Speaker 2: liberating sense of agency.
Speaker 1: Well, welcome to Thrilling for Eds. Today we are taking
Speaker 1: you on a journey to literally unravel the fabric of
Speaker 1: reality itself. We have a massive stack of notes here
Speaker 1: from an incredibly dense, fascinating source.
Speaker 2: Oh, it is remarkably dense. There's so much to unpack.
Speaker 1: You, there really is. So we're pulling from an interview
Speaker 1: hosted on the YouTube channel Alissa Nobriga Mme in a
Speaker 1: video titled Timeline Split. Humanity is moving into different realities.
Speaker 1: The guest is an esoteric teacher and alchemist named.
Speaker 2: Sarah, and the concepts dropped in this conversation are just staggering.
Speaker 1: They are. But our mission today is to decode this
Speaker 1: intense spiritual roadmap. We are taking concepts like quantum leaps,
Speaker 1: fifth dimensional consciousness, twin flames, the matrix, and we're translating
Speaker 1: them into practical, grounded insights for your own.
Speaker 2: Life, which is so important because it's very easy for
Speaker 2: esoteric material to just float away into vague spiritual platitudes.
Speaker 1: Yes, totally, and I am endlessly curious about how these
Speaker 1: high level mystical concepts actually mirror our daily modern struggles,
Speaker 1: like how does this apply to me sitting in traffic?
Speaker 2: Right? And this source attempts to provide a structural, almost
Speaker 2: mechanical explanation for the immense turbulence humanity is experiencing right now.
Speaker 2: So we are going to synthesize these wild ideas into
Speaker 2: a cohesive framework of human evolution. We aren't just going
Speaker 2: to look at the what of these theories.
Speaker 1: They're going to tear apart the how and the why.
Speaker 2: Exactly, examining the underlying mechanics of consciousness and reality creation.
Speaker 1: So let's jump right in. The source begins with a
Speaker 1: massive reality altering claim that demands immediate unpacking. She states
Speaker 1: unequivocally that humanity experience a massive timeline split in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty five.
Speaker 2: A huge claim, and because of this split, she says
Speaker 2: that between now and twenty thirty, a metaphorical veil is lifting.
Speaker 1: A veil lifting. Okay, what does that actually mean for
Speaker 1: us on the ground.
Speaker 2: It means that old structures built on distorted belief systems,
Speaker 2: institutions that rely on and fear or separation, like our
Speaker 2: current banking system, they will accelerate into a total collapse.
Speaker 2: It forces a shift toward unity, consciousness, and twenty twenty
Speaker 2: six is specifically flagged as the year that changes everything.
Speaker 1: Okay, so my immediate pushback when I hear this is
Speaker 1: purely logistical. I mean, how does they split actually work
Speaker 1: if we are all clearly still experiencing the same physical world.
Speaker 2: That's the million dollar question, isn't it right?
Speaker 1: I still go to the grocery store. I still sit
Speaker 1: in traffic next to people who supposedly might be on
Speaker 1: a different timeline. If I think about this mechanically, well,
Speaker 1: I imagine a massive highway interchange.
Speaker 2: Okay, I like where this is going.
Speaker 1: So for a few miles, they're on a ten lane highway, right,
Speaker 1: all the cars are driving side by side at sixty
Speaker 1: five miles an hour. You are in the same geographic
Speaker 1: space as the driver next.
Speaker 2: To you, but you're in different lanes.
Speaker 1: Exactly. You are in a lane that is technically the
Speaker 1: beginning of an off ramp heading toward the mountains, and
Speaker 1: they are in the on ridplane for a totally different interstate,
Speaker 1: heading toward the desert.
Speaker 2: Right, So you are physically adjacent for a moment, but
Speaker 2: your destinations have already been entirely determined by the lane
Speaker 2: you occupy.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's the only way I can wrap my head.
Speaker 2: Around it, and that highway analogy perfectly illustrates the mathematics
Speaker 2: of what esoteric traditions called bifurcation. We tend to imagine
Speaker 2: a timeline split as this literal physical wall dropping out
Speaker 2: of the sky, separating people into two different earths.
Speaker 1: Like a sci fi movie exactly.
Speaker 2: But the source clarifies that bifurcation is actually a mathematical principle.
Speaker 2: It's used to describe a system whose variables change to
Speaker 2: the point where the system splits into two distinct stable states.
Speaker 1: So it's not a physical separation at all.
Speaker 2: No, in the context of this deep dive into the
Speaker 2: source material, it's a way for our three dimensional brains
Speaker 2: to comprehend the deeper action occurring in the quantum field.
Speaker 2: We're talking about multiple trajectories of consciousness occupying the same
Speaker 2: geographical space, but tuning into completely different and bandwidth of reality.
Speaker 1: Oh I see, So it isn't a sci fi portal
Speaker 1: opening up in times square. It's more like two different
Speaker 1: radio stations broadcasting in the same room.
Speaker 2: That's a great way to look at it.
Speaker 1: Like, if you tune your receiver to ninety eight point one,
Speaker 1: you hear classical music, but if you tune it to
Speaker 1: one to one point five you hear heavy metal. The
Speaker 1: radio waves are overlapping in the exact same physical space,
Speaker 1: but the experience is completely divergent based on the frequency
Speaker 1: you are tuned to.
Speaker 2: That is the exact mechanism she's describing. According to the source,
Speaker 2: the overarching frequencies are splitting into two primary.
Speaker 1: Streams, ascending and descending.
Speaker 2: Right there are ascending timelines driven by individuals moving toward
Speaker 2: higher consciousness, self awareness, unity. Simultaneously, there are descending or
Speaker 2: stagnant timelines dominantly vibrating in fear, restriction, and lower consciousness.
Speaker 1: So the veil lifting by twenty thirty is simply the
Speaker 1: process of the physical material world finally catching up to
Speaker 1: reflect this underlying energetic divergence.
Speaker 2: Exactly, the structures built on fear, the exploitati financial models
Speaker 2: that distorted political belief systems, they cannot sustain themselves in
Speaker 2: the ascending trajectory. They literally run out of the specific
Speaker 2: energetic fuel they require to operate.
Speaker 1: Which logically brings us to our next major theme, which
Speaker 1: is the collapse of these systems and what our survival
Speaker 1: tool is in the midst of this chaos, because if
Speaker 1: you are inside a building that is being demolished, they're
Speaker 1: going to be loud.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the loudest, dustiest, most terrifying part of the experience
Speaker 1: is the moment right before it completely falls apart.
Speaker 2: Very true, and the source argues that as these toxic
Speaker 2: systems collapse, humanity is undergoing a massive awakening, driven by
Speaker 2: our ability to finally see through what she calls parasitic
Speaker 2: forms of pathology.
Speaker 1: Parasitic forms of pathology. I have to admit I have
Speaker 1: a bit of friction with that.
Speaker 2: Freezing Oh really, why is that?
Speaker 1: Well? When I hear parasitic pathology, it sounds like we
Speaker 1: are talking about literal Sci fi energy vampires or malevolent
Speaker 1: entities feeding on us. Is this an actual esote claim
Speaker 1: about unseen beings or is this just a highly dramatic,
Speaker 1: spiritualized metaphor for like late stage capitalism and algorithmic manipulation.
Speaker 2: Well, the brilliance of the source material is that it
Speaker 2: operates perfectly on both levels. You don't actually have to
Speaker 2: believe in invisible entities for the mechanics to apply to
Speaker 2: your daily life. Let's ground this in the attention economy
Speaker 2: and neurobiology.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's do that.
Speaker 2: A parasitic system is any structure that requires you to
Speaker 2: expend your life force, your attention, your emotional output, your
Speaker 2: nervous systrem's regulatory capacity in order to sustain its own
Speaker 2: existence without giving you anything nourishing in return. Think about
Speaker 2: how the amiggala in your brain functions. It is designed
Speaker 2: to scan for threats.
Speaker 1: So these systems are essentially weaponizing our biology. They are
Speaker 1: hijacking the amignala.
Speaker 2: Precisely deceptive pathological structures, whether that is a hyperpolarized news cycle,
Speaker 2: a toxic workplace, or an exploitative financial system. They require
Speaker 2: your energetic consent to findunction.
Speaker 1: They need you to believe in the fear they are
Speaker 1: selling so that you continue to engage with them.
Speaker 2: Yes, and the ultimate tool right now isn't just raw
Speaker 2: intellect or gathering more information. The survival tool is highly
Speaker 2: developed emotional intelligence.
Speaker 1: This maps so perfectly onto our modern digital experience. Let's
Speaker 1: look at the phenomenon of doom scrolling or you know,
Speaker 1: engaging with online rage bait.
Speaker 2: We've all been there, we really have.
Speaker 1: I want you, the listener, to really analyze your physical
Speaker 1: state the next time you fall down one of these
Speaker 1: digital rabbit holes. Have you noticed how physically and mentally
Speaker 1: exhausted you feel after thirty minutes of absorbing highly polarized
Speaker 1: toxic content.
Speaker 2: It's a very real physical drain.
Speaker 1: It feels like an energy tax is being withdrawn directly
Speaker 1: from your nervous system. Your breathing gets shallow, your shoulders
Speaker 1: tens up. But then think about the immense power you
Speaker 1: feel in the split second you recognize the manipulation, and
Speaker 1: you simply choose to look away. Yes, you put the
Speaker 1: phone down, you break the spell.
Speaker 2: What you were describing is the exact mechanism of withdrawing
Speaker 2: energetic consent. Emotional intelligence acts at an unbreachable energetic firewall.
Speaker 1: Oh I love that, an energetic firewall.
Speaker 2: When you are emotionally intelligent, you recognize the somatic sensation
Speaker 2: of being rage bated. You can literally feel the cortisol's
Speaker 2: spike in your bloodstream, and you can trace it back
Speaker 2: to the pathological system that triggered it. You see through
Speaker 2: the pathology.
Speaker 1: You realize the system isn't trying to inform you, It's
Speaker 1: trying to harvest your outrage.
Speaker 2: And once a critical mass of humanity develops, this level
Speaker 2: of emotional intelligence and stops feeding these systems with their
Speaker 2: fear and attention. Those systems are rendered structurally powerless.
Speaker 1: They just starve.
Speaker 2: Right, and the Source makes a profound prediction here. She says,
Speaker 2: these collapsing systems will try to rebrand. They will change
Speaker 2: their names, update their corporate logos, alter their messaging to
Speaker 2: sound more conscious or green or unified, but it won't
Speaker 2: matter exactly. The rebranding is irrelevant. Without the underlying fuel
Speaker 2: of human consent and fear, they must collapse. Furthermore, the
Speaker 2: Source ties this directly to the rise of artificial intelligence.
Speaker 2: So well, in a reality where intellect, data processing, and
Speaker 2: information generation can be entirely outsourced to a machine, what
Speaker 2: becomes the most scarce and valuable human.
Speaker 1: Asset our humanity itself?
Speaker 2: Right, It is presence, It is embodiment. It is the
Speaker 2: nuance capability of emotional intelligence.
Speaker 1: So we've activated the firewall. We are reclaiming our energy.
Speaker 1: We are unplugging from the doom scroll. We are watching
Speaker 1: these parasitic systems crumble without giving them our fear. What
Speaker 1: do we actually do with all that reclaimed energy?
Speaker 2: This leads us into the sources exploration of quantum mechanics manifestation,
Speaker 2: and a fascinating archetype called the trickster.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's talk about manifestation, because I think the source
Speaker 1: reframes this concept in a way that directly challenges the
Speaker 1: modern commercialized self help industry.
Speaker 2: Oh. Absolutely. The popular narrative usually tells you to hyper
Speaker 2: focus on exactly what you want, visualize it endlessly, and
Speaker 2: attempt to force the universe to deliver us specific outcome,
Speaker 2: like a.
Speaker 1: Certain bank balance, a particular job, or a specific partner.
Speaker 2: Yes, but the source argues that chasing desires from a
Speaker 2: place of lack or thirst actually repels them.
Speaker 1: Which mechanically makes total sense. If you are desperately chasing something,
Speaker 1: the underlying frequency you are broadcasting into the quantum field
Speaker 1: is you know, I do not have this. I am
Speaker 1: empty without it. I am currently existing in a state
Speaker 1: of deprivation.
Speaker 2: You cannot manifest abundance from a frequency of starvation. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it just doesn't work.
Speaker 1: True.
Speaker 2: Quantum leaping, according to this material, requires shifting your focus
Speaker 2: entirely away from desperate personal acquisition and focusing on the
Speaker 2: greater good.
Speaker 1: Focus on the greater good to manifest personal reality.
Speaker 2: Yes, the physics principle here is that if your intention
Speaker 2: genuinely serves a larger ecosystem, the universe provides an abundance
Speaker 2: of resources because you are now acting as a low
Speaker 2: resistance conduit for a larger evolutionary signal.
Speaker 1: Okay, I know this is a point where the model
Speaker 1: in mind instantly rebels, because I hear this in a
Speaker 1: common doubt arises. Does focusing on the greater good mean
Speaker 1: I have to sacrifice what I want?
Speaker 2: Right? Do I have to become a martyr?
Speaker 1: Exactly? Do you have to take a vow of poverty
Speaker 1: and become a martyr for humanity? But that is a
Speaker 1: misunderstanding born from zero sum thinking. Think of a massive,
Speaker 1: ancient oak tree in a forest.
Speaker 2: Okay, let's look at the tree.
Speaker 1: The tree doesn't aggressively hoarde sunlight and water out of
Speaker 1: a sense of lack, terrified that the pine tree next
Speaker 1: door is going to steal its resources. It doesn't shrink
Speaker 1: itself down to be humble. It simply grows to its
Speaker 1: highest possible, most magnificent.
Speaker 2: Potential, and by doing so it serves the forest.
Speaker 1: Yes, by growing so large and healthy, it inevitably drops
Speaker 1: leaves that decompose and feed the rich soil Its expansive
Speaker 1: root system prevents hillside erosion. Its massive branches provide shelter
Speaker 1: for hundreds of species of wildlife. The entire ecosystem around
Speaker 1: it flourishes because the tree reached its maximum selfish potential.
Speaker 2: Selfish in the best possible way.
Speaker 1: Right, It's an ecosystem of what the Source brilliantly calls opulence,
Speaker 1: not scarcity. Your personal success, when decoupled from desperate, fearful lack,
Speaker 1: naturally feeds the greater good.
Speaker 2: That is the perfect biological translation of the concept. Higher
Speaker 2: consciousness has absolutely no judgment about abundance. It views opulence
Speaker 2: as the natural, resting state of the universe.
Speaker 1: So how do we get there?
Speaker 2: Well, to understand how we actually bridge the gap between
Speaker 2: where we are and that state of opulence, we have
Speaker 2: to look at the physics metaphor the speaker uses to
Speaker 2: describe the quantum field.
Speaker 1: Let's break down the wave mechanics of this. Because the
Speaker 1: imagery use in the interview was fantastic. How does a
Speaker 1: thought or a desire actually cross the threshold into physical reality?
Speaker 2: The Source compares the quantum field to an ocean wave.
Speaker 2: At the base of the ocean, in the deep water,
Speaker 2: you have the realm of infinite possibility. Every potential reality
Speaker 2: exists simultaneously in a state of superposition.
Speaker 1: So anything can happen at that deep.
Speaker 2: Level, anything in everything. As a wave begins to flo
Speaker 2: gather momentum, and draw water upward, those infinite possibilities start
Speaker 2: dropping off. The field narrows down into probabilities.
Speaker 1: The wave is getting taller, but the options are getting narrower.
Speaker 2: Right, this is the peak of the wave, just before
Speaker 2: it breaks. When the wave finally crashes onto the shore,
Speaker 2: collapsing the wave function. That is when probability becomes actuality.
Speaker 2: So you move from infinite possibility, narrow down to probability,
Speaker 2: and crash into the present moment as actuality.
Speaker 1: But here's the catch. You can't ride that massive quantum
Speaker 1: wave without fundamentally disrupting the stagnant water you are currently
Speaker 1: floating in.
Speaker 2: No, you cannot, And.
Speaker 1: This is where the source introduces one of the most
Speaker 1: misunderstood archetypes in human history, the trickster.
Speaker 2: Yes, our modern culture usually frames the trickster as a
Speaker 2: negative force, you know, malicious prankster, a liar, or a
Speaker 2: chaotic villain.
Speaker 1: But in alchemy, the trickster is revered as the ultimate
Speaker 1: archetype of transformation. Why is that? Why does alchemical transformation
Speaker 1: require a trickster Why can't it just be a smooth,
Speaker 1: peaceful transition from bad to good.
Speaker 2: Because systems, whether they are societal structures or your own
Speaker 2: personal psychological habits, they see homeostasis. They want to stay
Speaker 2: exactly as they are, even if they're toxic comfort zone. Exactly.
Speaker 2: If the universe or your higher self is attempting to
Speaker 2: guide you toward a quantum leap, it will employ trickster
Speaker 2: energy to dismantle the rigid, comfortable reality you're clinging to.
Speaker 1: So trickster breaks things.
Speaker 2: The trickster is the archetype willing to look directly into
Speaker 2: the abyss, confront the stagnant shadows, and pull energy out
Speaker 2: of the darkness to transform it into an exalted state.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 2: When a trickster event happens in your life, maybe you
Speaker 2: lose a job you thought was secure, or relationship unexpectedly implodes,
Speaker 2: it feels like sheer destructive chaos, but it is actually
Speaker 2: highly targeted alchemical transformation. It is the disruption required to
Speaker 2: break the homeostasis of your limitations.
Speaker 1: It's the universe forcing you out of the nest exactly
Speaker 1: well to ride these quantum waves and navigate the sell
Speaker 1: chemical chaos without losing our minds. The Source emphasizes that
Speaker 1: we must upgrade our internal operating system.
Speaker 2: Yes, moving from three D to five D.
Speaker 1: We hear these terms thrown around constantly in spiritual circles, right,
Speaker 1: three D, five D upgrading consciousness. But the Source defines
Speaker 1: these states with incredible structural clarity, and I think understanding
Speaker 1: the mechanical difference between them is vital.
Speaker 2: The distinction is foundational. The Source defines three D or
Speaker 2: a third dimensional consciousness as a state marked by heavy judgment,
Speaker 2: spiritual amnesia, and an over identification with the physical body.
Speaker 1: If we translate that into the nervous system, three D
Speaker 1: consciousness is essentially living in a chronic state of sympathetic
Speaker 1: nervous system dominance.
Speaker 2: The fight, flight or freeze response.
Speaker 1: Exactly when you are in survival mode, your brain physically
Speaker 1: narrows its focus. You literally lose peripheral vision. You view
Speaker 1: the world through a lens of absolute separation. It is
Speaker 1: me against you. It is tribalism, petition, and viewing the
Speaker 1: universe as a random, disconnected and hostile environment.
Speaker 2: It is a consciousness of isolation. Five D consciousness, conversely,
Speaker 2: is described as reaching an integration point of what the
Speaker 2: speaker calls paradox consciousness or unity consciousness paradox consciousness.
Speaker 1: That phrase alone requires a deeper look.
Speaker 2: Well, in five D consciousness, you realize you are fundamentally
Speaker 2: interconnected with the whole. You realize you are more than
Speaker 2: just a localized physical body. But the paradox is that
Speaker 2: you do not use that vast spiritual realization to negate
Speaker 2: or escape your human experience.
Speaker 1: You don't just float off a mountain.
Speaker 2: No, the intellect doesn't disappear. It seems into the heart center.
Speaker 2: The mind is put in service of the heart. You
Speaker 2: achieve a state of parasympathetic regulation, rest, digest, and connect,
Speaker 2: while simultaneously maintaining sharp cognitive awareness.
Speaker 1: Which perfectly frames a profound concept from the source, the
Speaker 1: paradox of transformation. Yes, when I first heard this, myologic
Speaker 1: brain just kind of short circuited. The source suggests that
Speaker 1: embracing stress actually brings peace. Embracing a feeling of total
Speaker 1: unworthiness actually brings an undeniable sense of worth.
Speaker 2: It sounds like an oxymoron, it really does.
Speaker 1: But I want to challenge you. The listener right now,
Speaker 1: Think of a specific time in your life when you
Speaker 1: were fighting a heavy negative emotion with.
Speaker 2: Everything you had, like a panic attack.
Speaker 1: Maybe right maybe it was suffocating anxiety before a public
Speaker 1: speaking event, or crushing grief over a breakup. You fought it,
Speaker 1: you tried to outthink it, you drank to numb it.
Speaker 1: You judged yourself for feeling it. And the more you
Speaker 1: push against the wall, the thicker the wall became. Right,
Speaker 1: the emotion only grew more monstrous.
Speaker 2: Because you were feeding it with resistance.
Speaker 1: Yes, but then think of the moment you're exhaustion peaked
Speaker 1: and you finally just surrendered. You stopped fighting the feeling.
Speaker 1: You let it wash over you entirely. You said, okay,
Speaker 1: I am terrified right now, I feel completely broken, and
Speaker 1: I give up fighting it. And what happens, what happens
Speaker 1: mechanically in the body in that moment, The second you
Speaker 1: stop resisting, the emotion loses its kinetic energy. It just evaporates.
Speaker 2: Because resistance is an active state, it requires an enormous
Speaker 2: amount of continuous energetic output. What you are describing is
Speaker 2: the absolute necessity of sincerity and openness in making the
Speaker 2: shift from three D to five D.
Speaker 1: Sincerity is key.
Speaker 2: The source points out a crucial dynamic. If you are
Speaker 2: sincere and open, literally nothing can stop your evolutionary progress.
Speaker 2: But if you are committed to what she calls cleverness,
Speaker 2: meaning if you are constantly trying to outsmart your own pain,
Speaker 2: if you are intellectually bypassing your emotional reality or trying
Speaker 2: to logically hack your way out of a dark night
Speaker 2: of the soul, nothing can help you.
Speaker 1: Cleverness acts as a dense energetic block. Exact, cleverness is
Speaker 1: just the ego trying to manage the soul's evolution.
Speaker 2: It doesn't work, it never works. And this ties beautifully
Speaker 2: into the esoteric archetype of the fool from the tarot,
Speaker 2: which the expert and the source material specifically highlights zero
Speaker 2: card right in the major arcana. The fool is the
Speaker 2: zero card. It represents the profound realization that you are nothing.
Speaker 2: You are an empty, unconditioned vessel, so that you have
Speaker 2: the capacity to become everything.
Speaker 1: Because if your cup is full, you can't add anything else.
Speaker 2: Precisely, if you walk into a crisis believing you already
Speaker 2: know exactly what is happening and how to fix it,
Speaker 2: your cup is full. Nothing new can enter the fool
Speaker 2: willingly empties.
Speaker 1: The cup that requires so much trust it does.
Speaker 2: Furthermore, the Source delivers a stark structural warning regarding this process.
Speaker 2: The opposite of acceptance is not merely stubbornness. The opposite
Speaker 2: of acceptance is denial. Oh and esoterically and psychologically, denial
Speaker 2: acts as a highly destructive force. A life path built
Speaker 2: on successive layers of denial eventually leads to deeply distorted manifestations.
Speaker 2: You build a reality that is fundamentally at war with itself.
Speaker 1: So we know we need to drop the cleverness. We
Speaker 1: know we need to empty the cup and embrace the
Speaker 1: paradox of transformation. But how do we practically enact this
Speaker 1: shift on a daily basis?
Speaker 2: Well, the Source dives very deeply into mechanics of energetic
Speaker 2: healing and frequencies, and a major theme is that true
Speaker 2: healing must be incredibly dynamic and a tune to the individual.
Speaker 1: The expert outlines a clinical protocol of actually asking the
Speaker 1: client's energy field what it specifically prefers or requires in
Speaker 1: that exact moment.
Speaker 2: Which is such a radical departure from Western medicine's one size.
Speaker 1: Fits all approach and even a lot of New Age
Speaker 1: dogmas that say just meditate for twenty minutes and visualize
Speaker 1: white light. It respects the body's innate momentary wisdom.
Speaker 2: It treats the human energy field as a highly intelligent,
Speaker 2: communicative ecosystem. The fields might require Yen energy, which is receptive,
Speaker 2: cooling and inward focused, or it might require yang energy,
Speaker 2: which is active driving and boundary setting.
Speaker 1: It could need fire or water exactly.
Speaker 2: It might need the purifying, transformative quality of fire or
Speaker 2: the compassionate flowing quality of water. True healing is about
Speaker 2: meeting the moment based on what the nervous system and
Speaker 2: the energetic body are actually asking for, not what the
Speaker 2: practitioner intellectually prefers to administer.
Speaker 1: The source also discusses working with frequencies at a quantum level,
Speaker 1: describing them almost like HTML light codes for the human
Speaker 1: energy field.
Speaker 2: HTML like codes. It sounds incredibly abstract, it does.
Speaker 1: So let's translate that. If we look at the science
Speaker 1: of simatics, where specific sound frequencies can cause sand on
Speaker 1: a metal plate to organize into complex sacred geometric patterns,
Speaker 1: we know that frequency dictates form.
Speaker 2: Right, the sound physically moves.
Speaker 1: The sand exactly a HTML code dictates how a web
Speaker 1: page displays text and images. A light code or a
Speaker 1: specific energetic frequency dictates how your nervous system and your
Speaker 1: energetic body organize themselves.
Speaker 2: That is an excellent grounding of the concept. It is
Speaker 2: fundamentally about resonance.
Speaker 1: Right, And I love the analogy the source uses here
Speaker 1: referencing Michelangelo. There's this famous myth that Michelangela said he
Speaker 1: didn't actually sculpt the statue of David.
Speaker 2: Oh, I've heard this. He just chipped away the excess.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he just looked at the massive block of marble
Speaker 1: and chipped away everything that wasn't David. The masterpiece was
Speaker 1: already fully formed inside.
Speaker 2: I love that.
Speaker 1: This is how the source describes working with these HTML
Speaker 1: like codes or frequencies. It isn't about pouring some new
Speaker 1: magical substance into your body to fix you operating under
Speaker 1: the assumption that you are fundamentally.
Speaker 2: Broken, because you aren't broken, right.
Speaker 1: It's about introducing a frequency of resonance that triggers your
Speaker 1: internal trauma blocks to release. It chips away the dense
Speaker 1: condition traumatized marble so that the baseline masterpiece of your
Speaker 1: true self can simply emerge and.
Speaker 2: That concept of unearthing the true self inevitably leads to
Speaker 2: a massive question, who or what is the true self
Speaker 2: that is actually being unearthed?
Speaker 1: Ah? Yes, the Higher Self. The source provides two mind bending,
Speaker 1: seemingly contradictory definitions for the higher self.
Speaker 2: Yes, and both of them completely expand the perspective of
Speaker 2: what it means to be human. Let's look at the
Speaker 2: first one.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: The first definition offered is that the higher self is
Speaker 2: actually a higher dimensional or angelic consciousness that has specifically
Speaker 2: come in to assist with our genetics.
Speaker 1: Whoa assist with our genetics?
Speaker 2: Yes? The underlying premise here is that this three D
Speaker 2: Earth reality is a highly restricted, heavily manipulated, and perhaps
Speaker 2: even unnatural environment.
Speaker 1: Like a quarantine zone kind of.
Speaker 2: The theory suggests our genetics have been deeply tampered with
Speaker 2: over millennia to keep us locked in a state of
Speaker 2: amnesia and separation. Therefore, a higher dimensional intelligence essentially links
Speaker 2: with our localized consciousness to act as a copilot, assisting
Speaker 2: in our navigation and genetic evolution through this dense.
Speaker 1: Matrix, a multidimensional copilot overwriting a hacked genetic code that
Speaker 1: is wild to think about what's the second definition.
Speaker 2: The second definition plays with the physics of time. The
Speaker 2: source suggests that time is not an absolute law of
Speaker 2: the universe, but rather a localized construct.
Speaker 1: A feature of this specific dimension.
Speaker 2: Right designed to allow for a linear narrative or a
Speaker 2: story to unfold outside of this specific three D architecture.
Speaker 2: Time as a linear progression does not exist. Everything happens
Speaker 2: in the eternal now, so.
Speaker 1: Past, present, and future are all happening at once.
Speaker 2: Exactly Therefore, the higher self is actually the future, fully
Speaker 2: of all, fully realized version of you, existing outside of time,
Speaker 2: reaching backward through the illusion of the timeline to guide
Speaker 2: your current localized self forward.
Speaker 1: I find that incredibly beautiful, the idea that the profound
Speaker 1: intuition you feel, the sudden bursts of clarity, the guidance
Speaker 1: pulling you out of danger, it's just you. It is
Speaker 1: you from the finish line, whispering the turn by turn
Speaker 1: directions back to you at the starting line.
Speaker 2: It is a very empowering way to look at intuition.
Speaker 1: But this brings up a very serious practical rub for
Speaker 1: anyone listening who is actually undergoing this process, Because if
Speaker 1: we are waking up, if we are shedding our protective
Speaker 1: three D armor, dropping our cleverness and becoming these hyper
Speaker 1: sensitive open vessels communicating with our higher selves. We are
Speaker 1: suddenly going to feel everything.
Speaker 2: Yes, the sensitive he goes way up.
Speaker 1: The Source notes that people are rapidly letting go of
Speaker 1: their social masks, which she calls their phantom of the
Speaker 1: opera masks. If I drop my mask and I walk
Speaker 1: into a grocery store where a hundred other people are
Speaker 1: vibrating in various states of anxiety, grief, and fear, I
Speaker 1: am suddenly exposed to a tidal wave of psychic noise.
Speaker 2: It can be completely overwhelming.
Speaker 1: How do we stop being an emotional sponge? How do
Speaker 1: you exist in a crowded room without absorbing everyone's trauma?
Speaker 2: This is critical issue for highly sensitive people, and the
Speaker 2: advice the Source gives on this is perhaps the most
Speaker 2: advanced and counterintuitive insight in the entire deep dive into
Speaker 2: the source material.
Speaker 1: I can't wait to hear this.
Speaker 2: If you look at standard New Age or spiritual advice,
Speaker 2: it is obsessively focused on defense mechanisms. It tells you
Speaker 2: to build energetic shields, visualize mirrors around yourself, cut chords
Speaker 2: with people, and constantly monitor and clear your energy field
Speaker 2: with sage or crystals.
Speaker 1: Which sounds completely exhausting. If you are already overwhelmed, adding
Speaker 1: a full time job as a psychic security guard seems counterproductive.
Speaker 2: It is entirely counterproductive, and the expert in the source
Speaker 2: points out the underlying paradox. The more you focus intensely
Speaker 2: on clearing other people's energy, the more you are perpetuating
Speaker 2: a cycle where you are defining your reality in opposition
Speaker 2: to others.
Speaker 1: You're giving your power away.
Speaker 2: By obsessing over the invasion. You are giving all of
Speaker 2: your energetic attention to the invasion. You are validating the threat.
Speaker 2: The radical solution offered is to stop managing the defense
Speaker 2: and double down entirely on creating.
Speaker 1: Double down on creating. Explain how that functions as a shield.
Speaker 2: It operates on the principle of electromagnetic fields. When you
Speaker 2: are deeply passionately immersed in your own creative power, whether
Speaker 2: you are aggressively building a business, painting a canvas, consciously
Speaker 2: raising a child, or simply cultivating a garden, with intense focus,
Speaker 2: you are generating a massive, highly coherent energetic field of
Speaker 2: your own.
Speaker 1: A localized frequency.
Speaker 2: Yes, your localized frequency becomes incredibly dense and fast. As
Speaker 2: the source says, when you are fully seated in your
Speaker 2: creative power, those massive external energetic distractions shrink down to
Speaker 2: the size.
Speaker 1: Of a nat They just bounce off.
Speaker 2: Exactly. You don't have to visualize a shield to fight
Speaker 2: them off. They simply cannot penetrate the coherence of your
Speaker 2: creative output. They bounce off because your energetic bandwidth is
Speaker 2: one hundred percent occupied with the broadcasts of your own aliveness.
Speaker 1: That shifts the entire paradigm. It takes you off a
Speaker 1: fearful defense and puts you on a joyous offense.
Speaker 2: It really does.
Speaker 1: Now, as we step into this immense creative power and
Speaker 1: unearth our true selves, it stands to reason that the
Speaker 1: way we connect with other human beings is going to
Speaker 1: undergo a radical mutation. The masks are off, the defensive
Speaker 1: shields are down, our frequencies.
Speaker 2: Are altering, relationships change entirely.
Speaker 1: This brings us to a part of the source material
Speaker 1: that is deeply fascinating, highly sought after, and frankly wildly
Speaker 1: misunderstood in popular culture, the realms of soul contracts and
Speaker 1: twin flames.
Speaker 2: This specific section of the interview drops a significant and
Speaker 2: likely controversial bombshell for anyone navigating modern spiritual relationship dynamics.
Speaker 1: Let's get into it.
Speaker 2: The concept of the twin flame has become a massive
Speaker 2: internet trend over the last decade, but the source suggests
Speaker 2: that the vast majority of people who believe they're in
Speaker 2: a twin flame dynamic are actually trapped in a deeply
Speaker 2: toxic karmic loop, a karma loop.
Speaker 1: Okay, what are the clinical signs that you are in
Speaker 1: a karmic loop rather than a genuine high vibrational connection.
Speaker 2: Well, a karma loop is characterized by intense, destabilizing push
Speaker 2: and pull dynamics. It is the classic running and chasing
Speaker 2: scenario that is so often romanticized online. There are deep
Speaker 2: agonizing power struggles. You experience immense almost gravitational magnetism toward
Speaker 2: the person, which is inevitably followed by volcle painful repulsion.
Speaker 1: It sounds exhausting it is.
Speaker 2: The source argues that these dynamics are not signs of
Speaker 2: a grand cosmic romance. They are signs of a karmic
Speaker 2: comp It is a relationship specifically designed by the higher
Speaker 2: self to trigger your deepest unhealed wounds so that they
Speaker 2: are forced to the surface where you can finally see them.
Speaker 1: So the purpose of the karmic relationship is illumination through pain. Essentially, yes,
Speaker 1: but true twin flame connections, according to the Source, operate
Speaker 1: on a completely different mechanical level. They don't rely on
Speaker 1: toxic trauma bonds. They operate on the physics principle of
Speaker 1: quantum entanglement exactly.
Speaker 2: Quantum entanglement in physics describes the scenario where two particles
Speaker 2: become so deeply linked that the state of one particle
Speaker 2: instantly dictates the state of the other, regardless of the
Speaker 2: physical distance between them.
Speaker 1: Like spooky action at a distance.
Speaker 2: Right in a genuine twin flame dynamic, the connection exists
Speaker 2: beyond the physical and emotional realms. It is entangled at
Speaker 2: the level of consciousness. The Source makes a fascinating claim here.
Speaker 2: She says, if one partner genuinely shifts their consciousness, and
Speaker 2: this specifically means completely letting go of the desperate, agonizing
Speaker 2: need for union, letting go of the obsession with the
Speaker 2: dynamic itself, the other partner automatically and instantly experiences a
Speaker 2: shift via that quantum entanglement.
Speaker 1: But the nuance here is crucial. You cannot fake the detachment.
Speaker 2: Oh, definitely not.
Speaker 1: You can't sit there and say, Okay, I am going
Speaker 1: to pretend to let go of them. I'm going to
Speaker 1: act totally detached so that the quantum mechanics will magically
Speaker 1: force them to text me. The universe doesn't respond to manipulation.
Speaker 1: It responds to actual frequency.
Speaker 2: It sees right through the cleverness.
Speaker 1: It must be a genuine structural, alchemical shift in your
Speaker 1: own energy where you truly realize you are whole without them.
Speaker 2: That is the paradox of transformation applied to relationships. Furthermore,
Speaker 2: the source clarifies that true twin flames are not brought
Speaker 2: together merely for personal romantic bliss. They operate at what
Speaker 2: the Greeks called and agape level.
Speaker 1: A gope unconditional humanitarian love.
Speaker 2: Yes, their union produces a frequency that is designed to
Speaker 2: have a higher purpose. It is meant to impact humanity
Speaker 2: or the collective gronment in some positive way, not just
Speaker 2: to satisfy a localized personal craving for a romantic validation.
Speaker 1: This entire discussion about relationships, using them for growth and
Speaker 1: then needing to detach it reminds me of a brilliant analogy.
Speaker 1: The host of the original interview brings up.
Speaker 2: Oh, the boat analogy.
Speaker 1: Yes, she quotes a famous non duality teaching from the
Speaker 1: sage Ramana Maharshi. It's the analogy of using a boat
Speaker 1: to cross a dangerous river. The spiritual teachings or, in
Speaker 1: the context of this discussion, the intense karmic relationship is
Speaker 1: the boat right?
Speaker 2: It gets you across.
Speaker 1: It is an incredibly useful, absolutely necessary tool for getting
Speaker 1: you from the muddy shore of your ignorance to the
Speaker 1: solid shore of your awakening. You couldn't have crossed the
Speaker 1: river without the boat. But once you reach the other
Speaker 1: side and you step onto dry land, you have to
Speaker 1: leave the boat behind.
Speaker 2: You can't carry it with you.
Speaker 1: If you try to pick up this massive, heavy, wooden
Speaker 1: boat and carry it on your back as you walk
Speaker 1: through the forest of your new life, it ceases to
Speaker 1: be a vehicle of salvation and becomes a crushing burden.
Speaker 2: That is a staggering visual.
Speaker 1: I really want you listening to this right now to
Speaker 1: pause and consider your own life. Are you carrying a boat?
Speaker 1: Is there a past relationship, a deeply painful trigger, or
Speaker 1: a karmic dynamic that successfully got you across a river.
Speaker 1: It forced you into therapy, it made you set boundaries,
Speaker 1: It got you to a new level of self awareness.
Speaker 1: But are you still carrying the emotional weight of that
Speaker 1: person or that narrative on your back instead of leaving
Speaker 1: it on the shore.
Speaker 2: That is a profound question to sit with, and it
Speaker 2: leads directly into the underlying mechanics of what the source
Speaker 2: calls soul contracts. Let's define that a sole contract fundamentally
Speaker 2: is an energetic meeting point design for mutual learning. It
Speaker 2: represents the fascinating interplay between predetermination and human free will.
Speaker 1: So the architecture of the contract implies that it is
Speaker 1: predetermined that we will meet, but our free will dictates
Speaker 1: exactly how that interaction plays out.
Speaker 2: Precisely, the contract dictates the intersection of your timelines. You
Speaker 2: are destined to cross paths to activate a specific latent,
Speaker 2: trait or lesson in one another. But how you navigate
Speaker 2: that intersection, whether you recognize the lesson and process it
Speaker 2: with grace, or whether your egos clash and you turn
Speaker 2: it into a decade's long, toxic litigious struggle. That is
Speaker 2: where the variable of free will is exercised.
Speaker 1: The choice is always ours.
Speaker 2: In the moment right and the Source also highlights a
Speaker 2: highly taboo truth in the spiritual community regarding the nature
Speaker 2: of our attractions. We deeply love to romanticize the idea
Speaker 2: that we are attracted to our shadow, or that we
Speaker 2: are drawn to our wounds. We build entire identities around
Speaker 2: our trauma bonds, we really do. But the expert clarifies
Speaker 2: a mechanical truth. We are only attracted to our wounds
Speaker 2: until we heal them.
Speaker 1: That is a massive paradigm shift. It means the attraction
Speaker 1: to chaos isn't a life sentence.
Speaker 2: It is not a life sentence. It's a diagnostic tool.
Speaker 2: Once the underlying lesson is fully integrated and the psychic
Speaker 2: wound is healed, the contract is complete. The magnetic resonance
Speaker 2: simply fizzles out.
Speaker 1: You just lose interest.
Speaker 2: Exactly, You literally stop being drawn to chaos wounding dynamics
Speaker 2: because there is nothing left in your frequency for that
Speaker 2: chaos to latch onto. After that healing occurs, the Source
Speaker 2: states that you become attracted to the reflection of your
Speaker 2: higher self. You begin to naturally seek expansive, highly conscious
Speaker 2: partnerships that facilitate growth, peace, and opulence. Rather than constriction
Speaker 2: and drama.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's pull the lens all the way back. We've
Speaker 1: looked at our internal nervous systems, our emotional firewalls, and
Speaker 1: our intimate relationships. Let's zoom out to the grand theater
Speaker 1: where all of this is playing out, our reality.
Speaker 2: Itself, the big picture.
Speaker 1: The Source has a very specific, evolving perspective on the
Speaker 1: fundamental nature of a reality what is culturally often referred
Speaker 1: to as the matrix. And what's particularly interesting is that
Speaker 1: the expert admits her own view on this architecture has
Speaker 1: shifted recently.
Speaker 2: It is a crucial evolution in esoteric thought. Over the
Speaker 2: past decade, popularized by various tech billionaires and philosophers, the
Speaker 2: dominant narrative of the simulation theory has likened our reality
Speaker 2: to a cold hard.
Speaker 1: Drive like a literal computer program.
Speaker 2: Yes, the idea is that this is a virtual reality
Speaker 2: training room where everything is strictly coded, synthetic, and sterile.
Speaker 2: The Source, however, has shifted away from this mechanical, silicon
Speaker 2: based view. She now describes the matrix as a layered
Speaker 2: collective dream like state.
Speaker 1: A collective dream, so it's organic and fluid, not synthetic
Speaker 1: and rigid.
Speaker 2: Yes, imagine that your higher self is asleep dreaming this
Speaker 2: specific human life into existence. But it is not a solitary,
Speaker 2: isolated dream. It is deeply entangled with the dreams of
Speaker 2: every other conscious being on the planet.
Speaker 1: We're all dreaming together.
Speaker 2: We are layers deep in a collective consciousness projection. It
Speaker 2: is a fabricated experience. Absolutely is a construct designed for learning,
Speaker 2: for experiencing limitation, and for testing character. But because it
Speaker 2: is a dream, it is highly fluid. It is responsive
Speaker 2: to the observer, which aligns with quantum mechanics, and it's
Speaker 2: deeply organic in its fundamental nature.
Speaker 1: Within the plot of this collective dream, the source predicts
Speaker 1: some massive earth shattering twists coming very soon, specifically regarding
Speaker 1: the concept of disclosure, the formal revelation of higher dimensional
Speaker 1: beings or extraterrestrials to the general human.
Speaker 2: Public, yes, the alien disclosure topic.
Speaker 1: The prediction made in the video is that this disclosure
Speaker 1: process will reach a profound peak within the next two years.
Speaker 2: And this is an area where the source notes a massive,
Speaker 2: highly polarized fifty to fifty schism within the spiritual and
Speaker 2: esoteric community itself. Regarding the nature of this impending.
Speaker 1: Disclosure over whether they are good or bad.
Speaker 2: Right, exactly half the community believes these revealed entities will
Speaker 2: be positive, benevolent guides arriving to assist humanity's ascension. The
Speaker 2: other half is entirely convinced they are negative, deceptive forces,
Speaker 2: perhaps the very architects of the parasitic systems we discussed
Speaker 2: earlier posing as saviors. It is a highly charged, deeply
Speaker 2: divisive topic.
Speaker 1: Well, what I find fascinating about this source's approach to
Speaker 1: the topic is that it frankly doesn't matter for our
Speaker 1: purposes whether these entities are malevolent arcons or benevolent galactic federations.
Speaker 2: It really doesn't change the assignment.
Speaker 1: No, I am entirely uninterested in taking a side on
Speaker 1: hypothetical galactic politics. What is incredibly relevant to us is
Speaker 1: the psychological impact of that disclosure on the human collective.
Speaker 1: If that veil lifts, if the government or scientific community
Speaker 1: suddenly says we are not alone and reality is vastly
Speaker 1: more complex than the physics textbooks claim, the ontological shock
Speaker 1: will be absolute.
Speaker 2: Ontological shock is a great term for it.
Speaker 1: It's the sudden, catastrophic shattering of your entire worldview. It
Speaker 1: forces every single human being to stop and ask why
Speaker 1: are we here right now during this specific chaotic window
Speaker 1: of time?
Speaker 2: And the host of the source video shared a visceral
Speaker 2: reaction to.
Speaker 1: This concept, yes, a feeling she mentioned having since childhood,
Speaker 1: a desperate urge to not waste this life. Because if
Speaker 1: we are existing in an intentionally amnesiac reality, a dream
Speaker 1: where we purposefully forgot the answers, forgot our multi dimensional
Speaker 1: nature just so we could experience the thrill, the gravity,
Speaker 1: and the stakes of the plot, how does that realization
Speaker 1: change how you live your Tuesday morning?
Speaker 2: It changes everything, primarily because it shifts you from identifying
Speaker 2: as a victim of random cruel circumstance to recognizing yourself
Speaker 2: as an active participant in a vast cosmic cycle.
Speaker 1: We aren't victims, we are players exactly.
Speaker 2: The expert in the video ties this intuitive feeling to
Speaker 2: immense historical and astronomical cycles, specifically referencing the procession of
Speaker 2: the ewanox, which is a roughly twenty six thousand year
Speaker 2: astronomical cycle.
Speaker 1: Wow, twenty six thousand years.
Speaker 2: Yes, ancient traditions believe these cycles govern the rise and
Speaker 2: fall of human consciousness. When you recognize that we are
Speaker 2: currently navigating the transition point of a massive cyclical plot,
Speaker 2: a grand cosmic reset. You regain your agency. The ultimate
Speaker 2: goal in this era isn't a frantically doom scroll to
Speaker 2: try and guess the future.
Speaker 1: It isn't to figure out which side of the alien
Speaker 1: disclosed your debate is correct.
Speaker 2: Now. The goal is to achieve what the Source terms
Speaker 2: spiritual sovereignty.
Speaker 1: Spiritual sovereignty that sounds like the ultimate internal anchor in
Speaker 1: a storm.
Speaker 2: It is the only anchor that holds. Spiritual sovereignty is
Speaker 2: an internal clarity, a coherent frequency, and an alignment with
Speaker 2: your higher self that is so robust, so unshakable, that
Speaker 2: you transcend the need for external prophecies.
Speaker 1: You transcend the mass confusion.
Speaker 2: You transcend the algorithmic rage baiting and the systemic collapse
Speaker 2: of the three D structures. You know exactly who you are,
Speaker 2: You know exactly why you chose to incarnate here, and
Speaker 2: therefore external macrocosmic chaos simply cannot dictate your internal microcosmic state.
Speaker 1: So let's bring all these massive cosmological esoteric concepts down
Speaker 1: from the upper atmosphere and directly into your immediate reality.
Speaker 1: For the days and weeks ahead.
Speaker 2: Let's summarize it.
Speaker 1: If there is an overarching theme to decode from this
Speaker 1: deep exploration, it is that humanity has entered an era
Speaker 1: of intense, undeniable exposure. The timelines are mathematically divergent, the
Speaker 1: veils of consensus reality are lifting, and the old structures
Speaker 1: are crumbling around us, precisely because they can no longer
Speaker 1: extract the energetic consent and the fear they require to survive.
Speaker 2: And while that collapse undeniably looks and feels apocalyptic on
Speaker 2: the surface, the core structural message of the source material
Speaker 2: is deeply, profoundly optimistic. It really is. The actual good
Speaker 2: news is that genuine alchemical healing is happening on a
Speaker 2: mass scale, and because the density of the planet is shifting,
Speaker 2: that healing is working faster and better than ever before.
Speaker 2: We do not have to be terrified of the collapsing
Speaker 2: of old false systems. We just have to ensure we
Speaker 2: are not emotionally attached.
Speaker 1: To the rubble as a false Let go of the rubble.
Speaker 1: I love that. I want to leave you with a
Speaker 1: reminder of the beautiful, deeply grounded closing advice the expert
Speaker 1: gave in the interview when she was asked how a
Speaker 1: person should practically prepare for all of this turbulence.
Speaker 2: It was such simple advice.
Speaker 1: It was. She didn't say to go build an underground bunker.
Speaker 1: She didn't say to horrid physical resources and fear. She
Speaker 1: smiled and said, dance like nobody's watching.
Speaker 2: Just live your life.
Speaker 1: Yes, if consciousness is the fundamental reality, if this is
Speaker 1: all a layered dream, then your primary directive is to
Speaker 1: follow your aliveness. Double down on what you were actively
Speaker 1: creating in your own life, rather than obsessing over what
Speaker 1: is crumbling in the macrocosm. Be the artist chipping away
Speaker 1: the excess marble to reveal the masterpiece that was always inside.
Speaker 2: Cultivate your emotional intelligence to starve the parasitic systems, Let
Speaker 2: go of the karmic loops that no longer serve your evolution,
Speaker 2: and embrace the paradox of transformation by remaining entirely open
Speaker 2: and sincere to whatever arises in your field.
Speaker 1: We have covered incredible reality bending ground today, from the
Speaker 1: mathematics of collapsing timelines and the necessity of the trickster
Speaker 1: archetype to a quantum relationship entanglement and the architecture of
Speaker 1: the collective dream.
Speaker 2: It's been quite the journey, but.
Speaker 1: As always on thrilling threads, we want to turn the
Speaker 1: conversation over to you. You want to bring this right
Speaker 1: back to the core hook of our deep dive into
Speaker 1: the sourceman material. If you truly believed with every fiber
Speaker 1: of your being that you were living in a collective
Speaker 1: layered dream right now, what is the very first rule
Speaker 1: of your reality that you would boldly choose to rewrite?
Speaker 1: Ponner that Let it simmer in your mind, see how
Speaker 1: the possibility of that freedom feels in your body, and
Speaker 1: drop your answer in the comments below. We absolutely cannot
Speaker 1: wait to read them.