Speaker 1: Enjoy these back to back classic Forbidden Knowledge News episodes. Today,
Speaker 1: I want to welcome back to the show Stephen Snyder.
Speaker 1: He is an author and longtime curator of Devise Up website,
Speaker 1: which is dedicated to parapolitics and high weirdness in all
Speaker 1: their many forms. With Frank Zero of Zero Night, he
Speaker 1: co hosts The Farm, a weekly podcast dedicated to parapolitics
Speaker 1: and synchronisticism. Steven, welcome back.
Speaker 2: How you doing not too bad?
Speaker 1: Sir, It's great to have you back on. It's been
Speaker 1: a little while. Today we're going to take an extremely
Speaker 1: deep dive into the possible connections between the Annunciation shooter
Speaker 1: and an online death cult that may be inducing demonic possession.
Speaker 1: The implications are incredible and may even involve very high
Speaker 1: level individuals and groups. So much to get to both
Speaker 1: before we do. It's been a while. Remind the audience
Speaker 1: a little bit about yourself and let them know how
Speaker 1: they can find out more about you.
Speaker 3: Well. I am the longtime curator of the Vised blog,
Speaker 3: which I don't really do much with anymore, but you
Speaker 3: can still find wealth of material, probably several books worth there.
Speaker 3: I'm also the host of The Farm podcast, which typically
Speaker 3: has a new episode out every Monday and is available
Speaker 3: on all the major platforms, Apple, Spotify, and so forth. Also,
Speaker 3: I do the farm Patreon with the additional episodes State
Speaker 3: of the Union addresses that recount a lot of current
Speaker 3: events and so forth. And I'm also the author of
Speaker 3: multiple books. The most recent one was Weird Tales, which
Speaker 3: dealt with a lot of recent events that have unfolded
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty five, starting with the Zizion the whole
Speaker 3: affair around that, and also a lot of the geop
Speaker 3: political implications of the kind of current shake up that's
Speaker 3: ongoing amongst the ruling elites, which seems to have worked
Speaker 3: its way out. I suppose you basically now have Peter
Speaker 3: TiO and a lot of these other people from the
Speaker 3: PayPal mafia on the driver's seats. But that is I suppose,
Speaker 3: only tangently related to the whole thing with the school shooters,
Speaker 3: though maybe not quite as separate as it we would
Speaker 3: initially seem so. The most recent event we had was
Speaker 3: the Annunciation Catholic Church shooting, which happened on August twenty seventh,
Speaker 3: twenty twenty five. And one of the interesting things about
Speaker 3: this is that it happened near Minneapolis, Minnesota. I believe
Speaker 3: the specific area was Winden, if I recall correctly. But
Speaker 3: for those of you listening to this, you probably still
Speaker 3: recall this because it's relatively fresh in everybody's mind. But
Speaker 3: you had had the state represents native that was assassinated
Speaker 3: in Minneapolis in June fourteenth, twenty twenty five, Melissa Horkman,
Speaker 3: who was also killed along with her husband at their
Speaker 3: home at the time, and then earlier in the day
Speaker 3: there had been an attempted assassination of State Senator John
Speaker 3: Hoffman as well, along with his wife, and in both
Speaker 3: cases the shooter was Vance Bolter, who left a very interesting,
Speaker 3: let's just say, orgy of evidence following the shootings. Specifically,
Speaker 3: I'm thinking of the No Kings flyers that were left
Speaker 3: in his car. Of course, this was sort of unfolding
Speaker 3: at the time, and you had the No King's protest
Speaker 3: breaking out, you had the one in Utah over the
Speaker 3: same weekend that had a shooting, a current one of
Speaker 3: the rallies in Salt Lake City, so there were a
Speaker 3: lot of interesting developments unfolding during that whole time frame.
Speaker 3: So Bolter was trying to make it seem like he
Speaker 3: was affiliated with No Kings and with some kind of
Speaker 3: radical leftist even though he had only really targeted Democrats,
Speaker 3: and the only evidence for this, I believe was a
Speaker 3: bipartisan commission the Tim Waltz, the governor, had appointed him
Speaker 3: to several years ago. There's no doubt though, that Bolter
Speaker 3: was involved with a very militant Christian network centered around dominionism. Specifically,
Speaker 3: he had ties to the Kansas City Prophets and the
Speaker 3: New Apostolic Reformation movement. Bizarrely, one of his mentors, I believe,
Speaker 3: the person he had credited with his conversion, had murdered
Speaker 3: in South Africa back in the nineteen or excuse me,
Speaker 3: Zimbabwe back in the late nineteen eighties. So there were
Speaker 3: just a lot of very strange things about Bolter. So
Speaker 3: that shooting occurred on June fourteen, so about two or
Speaker 3: so months. A little over two months later, you have
Speaker 3: the whole incident at the Catholic Church with Robin Westman.
Speaker 3: There were approximately one hundred and sixteen rounds fired. My
Speaker 3: understanding is like what happened is the there was a
Speaker 3: school wide mass that had been called at about eight
Speaker 3: point fifteen. Robin Westman had barricaded the exits to the
Speaker 3: church building, and at about eight thirty she had opened
Speaker 3: fired at the students in there. About twenty were wounded,
Speaker 3: with two being killed. They were eight and ten years old.
Speaker 3: I believe I've mentioned it, but there were roughly one
Speaker 3: hundred and sixteen rounds fired. I believe one of the
Speaker 3: guns had jammed on Westman, who had ultimately committed suicide
Speaker 3: after the initial volley of bullets. I believe the shooting
Speaker 3: lasted approximately about two minutes. One thing I will point
Speaker 3: out about this, not to diminish the tragedy, but Westman
Speaker 3: seems to have been an awful shot one hundred and
Speaker 3: sixteen rounds at targets and a confined space like that
Speaker 3: and only killing two. Again, I mean, I'm thankful that
Speaker 3: she only killed two. Don't misunderstand me, But let's just
Speaker 3: say like somebody who had been through special operations training
Speaker 3: or had been trained by an actual operator would probably
Speaker 3: kill a lot more people in a confined space like
Speaker 3: that with one hundred and sixteen rounds fired. So there
Speaker 3: was at least that that. Westman seems to have not
Speaker 3: been an especially good shot. So there's already been a
Speaker 3: tremendous amount of speculation about Westman, their motives for all
Speaker 3: of this, you've seen the whole sort of gauntlet being
Speaker 3: rolled out there. Of course, predictively, you've seen a lot
Speaker 3: of people try to talk about psychotropic drugs, and of
Speaker 3: amusingly enough, apparently Robert Kennedy Junior has vowed to open
Speaker 3: an investigation into that probably should indicate how serious one
Speaker 3: of this was. Westman apparently had gone through a breakup
Speaker 3: shortly before the shooting, was living at some sort of
Speaker 3: unspecified person's house. But again, I mean, you know how
Speaker 3: much romantic things would have involved with this as debatable?
Speaker 3: The New York Post proposed somehow Westman working in a
Speaker 3: pot shop up to two weeks before the shooting was
Speaker 3: a factor. I couldn't actually bring my working what did
Speaker 3: you say that article? But I'm I'll just throw it out.
Speaker 4: She wasn't working in.
Speaker 3: The New York Post proposed that Westman work shop okay, okay,
Speaker 3: pot shop, cannabis shop, headshop up to two weeks before
Speaker 3: the shooting was a factor. Like I said, I couldn't
Speaker 3: bring myself to read that one. So yeah, but it's
Speaker 3: been proposed, like thanks, so the big one that's getting
Speaker 3: a lot of the sound bites right now was Westman
Speaker 3: being transgender. Apparently Westman had changed their name around twenty nineteen,
Speaker 3: if I remember correctly, But as recently as I had
Speaker 3: looked this up, and it was a few days ago,
Speaker 3: I didn't get a chance to check this before we
Speaker 3: started recording. But most recently when I looked at this,
Speaker 3: Westman had not started to medically transition yet, so there
Speaker 3: seems to be some question about that, and I could
Speaker 3: be mistaken. Maybe she did. I just at the time though,
Speaker 3: when I was doing research on this, there was a
Speaker 3: question of whether or not they had actually begun the
Speaker 3: process of physically transitioning or not. For me, what was
Speaker 3: really intriguing about it were some of the allegations that
Speaker 3: possession had been involved in the shooting, and of course,
Speaker 3: I mean there was sort of the low hanging fruits
Speaker 3: around this. Westman had decided to shoot up a Catholic
Speaker 3: school with school children in it, And there was also
Speaker 3: the bizarre drawing that Westman had done of herself, essentially
Speaker 3: depicting herself staring in a mirror with a rifle slung
Speaker 3: over her shoulder and this sort of demonic figure staring
Speaker 3: back at her, which was really quite peculiar. But just
Speaker 3: looking beyond that, if you go, for instance, and look
Speaker 3: at the video that she had posted on YouTube, I
Speaker 3: believe it was the evening before the shooting was to occur,
Speaker 3: but it was really quite disturbing on so many levels.
Speaker 3: But they're definitely least seems to be just something very
Speaker 3: very off about the person, the way that they're talking
Speaker 3: about everything in this video, and it sort of reminds me, honestly,
Speaker 3: in conversations that I've had with mentally ill people in DC,
Speaker 3: for instance, who I honestly had to wonder in those
Speaker 3: cases if they were maybe there was a little something
Speaker 3: up with them as well. But the point being this,
Speaker 3: the whole behavior and thinking about Westman is just very
Speaker 3: very peculiar, and the video is just extremely unsettling on
Speaker 3: so many levels.
Speaker 1: Let's talk a little bit about the other things that
Speaker 1: were brought up in conspiratorial circles, like the dad being
Speaker 1: involved with the CIA.
Speaker 3: I mean, I know he went to Wisconsin University of
Speaker 3: Wisconsin Madison, which does have a lot of very strange
Speaker 3: connections to it, But beyond that, I wasn't really seeing
Speaker 3: like anything. Again, I haven't looked at that for a
Speaker 3: couple of days, but I can't recall anything that had
Speaker 3: directly jumped out to me that he would have been
Speaker 3: involved specifically in the CIA. I feel like, I mean,
Speaker 3: when stuff like this happens, you know, people are so
Speaker 3: obsessed with like trying to draw some sort of like
Speaker 3: direct links to like an intelligent service, and I just
Speaker 3: I feel like people aren't really getting that, like it's
Speaker 3: you know, it's moved beyond that. I mean the days
Speaker 3: of like the sort of classic laudio set up where
Speaker 3: you had like case officers and operators that were managing
Speaker 3: assets in the field and you know, I mean mk
Speaker 3: ultra art show of type techniques that were done to
Speaker 3: them to maybe make them a little bit more vigorous
Speaker 3: in pursuing their ends. I mean, you know, it's not
Speaker 3: to say that this kind of stuff doesn't happen now,
Speaker 3: but with the way that technology has advanced, I mean,
Speaker 3: the intelligence services really really do not need to directly
Speaker 3: try to manage these people the way that they did
Speaker 3: years ago. And I mean, for me looking into this,
Speaker 3: that was what I really gravitated towards specifically was the
Speaker 3: cult that Westman seems to have become involved with online,
Speaker 3: in which I mean, a lot of people don't seem
Speaker 3: to have really talked a lot about but that is
Speaker 3: the I guess, for lack for lack of a better term,
Speaker 3: it's referred to as Saints' culture. Again, that's not my phrase,
Speaker 3: this is what some academics have come up with. So
Speaker 3: like roughly speaking, it kind of started to develop around
Speaker 3: twenty fifteen after Dylan Roof's shooting spree, and it was
Speaker 3: really pushed by an online group that was known as
Speaker 3: the Bull Patrol and they were so named because of
Speaker 3: Roofe's distinct bull cut haircut, and it led to just
Speaker 3: an absolute revere rents for him to the point that
Speaker 3: he was essentially turned into a saint. So you had
Speaker 3: first a podcast that was started called The Bowl Podcast
Speaker 3: by an individual and using the pseudonym Vic Mackie, which
Speaker 3: was the Oh gosh, that was the name of the
Speaker 3: cop and the Shield if I remember correctly, the corrupt one.
Speaker 3: He was later outed in twenty twenty, but I can't
Speaker 3: remember the guy's name now off the top of my head.
Speaker 3: But anyway, under the pseudonym Vic Mackie, this podcast started
Speaker 3: going dedicated to a lot of the reference around Dylan
Speaker 3: rufe It spread to a lot of discord and telegram
Speaker 3: groups and so forth, and gradually you started seeing more
Speaker 3: people that were brought into the Pantheon of Saints. I
Speaker 3: think one of the first ones was Robert Bauer's after Roof,
Speaker 3: that is to say, who allegedly killed eleven people inside
Speaker 3: the Tree of Life Synagogue and Pittsburgh. I think this
Speaker 3: would have been twenty seventeen or twenty eighteen. But the
Speaker 3: thing about this that was interesting is that Mackie claimed
Speaker 3: that Bowers had followed him on GAB and that the
Speaker 3: two had interacted in direct messages and so forth. Though
Speaker 3: I want to emphasize I don't know that it has
Speaker 3: ever been confirmed, but nonetheless he did claim that he
Speaker 3: had had contacts with Bowers before the shooting. So Bowers
Speaker 3: goes into the pantheon, and you've got some more people
Speaker 3: that are brought into it. One of them is Britain Toront,
Speaker 3: the christ Church, New Zealand shooter who killed fifty one
Speaker 3: people to mosque in March twenty nineteen. And again, if
Speaker 3: you watch Westman's videos, there are a ton of references
Speaker 3: to Toront, and you see the number fifty one written
Speaker 3: on several of his weapons. And so forth. So he
Speaker 3: was definitely a fan of what he did at christ Church.
Speaker 3: So after that, the Buld Patrol added John Ernest, who
Speaker 3: killed one person at a synagogue in San Diego County
Speaker 3: October twenty nineteen. And then there was Patrick Crusius, I believe,
Speaker 3: who killed twenty two people inside an olpasso in walmart
Speaker 3: in February twenty twenty. So it's interesting that you've got
Speaker 3: a lot of these spree killers at this point in time.
Speaker 3: These were mostly affiliated with rather openly far right causes.
Speaker 3: In a lot of cases, such as the christ Church shooter,
Speaker 3: they're trying to kill Muslims and so forth. But one
Speaker 3: thing that I do find interesting about a lot of
Speaker 3: the deaths that are linked to the Saint's culture is
Speaker 3: that they do occur in a lot of places of worship.
Speaker 3: You've obviously had with the Annunciation shooting a Catholic church.
Speaker 3: I just talked about the christ Church one, which was
Speaker 3: at a mosque. There have been several synagogues that have
Speaker 3: been tarked as well. In the case of what was
Speaker 3: his name, Wave Michael Page, the Wisconsin shooter, oh I
Speaker 3: think it was twenty twelve, he actually shot up a
Speaker 3: seakh Temple in Wisconsin, so he was also put in
Speaker 3: the pantheon. But it's very interesting that so many of
Speaker 3: these shootings did occur in places of worship, and that
Speaker 3: a lot of cases they did target children as well.
Speaker 3: So this is another reason why I think the Bull
Speaker 3: Patrol and the whole Saints culture was a very strong
Speaker 3: influence on Westman. And I'll get to some more concrete
Speaker 3: links here in a second. But after Mackie was outed
Speaker 3: around twenty twenty, the Bulk Patrol started kind of going
Speaker 3: into decline, but the Saints culture had really started to
Speaker 3: proliferate on a lot of telegram channels, and specifically they
Speaker 3: were the ones that were part of the so called
Speaker 3: Terragram collective, and that's a group of content creators dedicated
Speaker 3: to perpetuating accelerationist violence. This was managed through a combination
Speaker 3: of images and manuals, which the Saints culture was a
Speaker 3: crucial component of in terms of making people idolized as
Speaker 3: a lot of these murderers and so forth. So a
Speaker 3: lot of these killer Saints, I mean basically they're set
Speaker 3: up as like role models to be worshiped and emulated
Speaker 3: by the people that were a part of these circles,
Speaker 3: and each individual triggered by the saints had the possibility
Speaker 3: of achieving sainthood fromselves following the killing. So it's kind
Speaker 3: of curious how they did that in the sense that
Speaker 3: it almost becomes a sort of self replicating of death cult,
Speaker 3: if you will. So it's really starting to take off
Speaker 3: around this time. And some more background on Terragram Again,
Speaker 3: this is a network that's also had links to groups
Speaker 3: like the Seven sixty four, to the Order of Nine
Speaker 3: Angles and so forth, So there's a lot of very
Speaker 3: militant accelerationists that are tied up with the whole Tragram MILU.
Speaker 3: So anyway, also on teogram, like the whole criteria for
Speaker 3: a saint started to expand and eventually, by I believe
Speaker 3: we're in the into twenty twenty, they had a list
Speaker 3: of approximately fifty of these saints. So you've got some
Speaker 3: predictable people that were brought into Andrew Bravic, for instance,
Speaker 3: was brought into the list along with unibomber Ted Gazinsky,
Speaker 3: cult leader, Jim Jones, Oklahoma City bomber, Timothy McVay, Martin
Speaker 3: Luther King assassin James are Ray, sovereign citizen Teris Gordon
Speaker 3: call Fred W. Cohen was on it. Who's an interesting one.
Speaker 3: He was the Valentine Day shooter that had been linked
Speaker 3: to the son of Sam Coult. Braveck, of course, was
Speaker 3: plastered all over some of Westman's weapons. Big influence clearly
Speaker 3: was also a shout out to Ted Kay on one
Speaker 3: of the weapons as well, the ambiguous Ted Gazinsky that
Speaker 3: everybody absolutely loves in these groups. So the whole concept
Speaker 3: of the sainthood really started to crystallize the following year
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty one, and that was also, I believe,
Speaker 3: when there was a whole Telligrint Helgram channel, there was
Speaker 3: launch dedicated to them. And one of the strangest things
Speaker 3: that came out of this with these so called Saints cards,
Speaker 3: which were almost like these digital baseball cards that were
Speaker 3: being spread around and you don't I'm just going to
Speaker 3: quote here from an article of the lineage of violence,
Speaker 3: Saints Culture, and militant accelerationism by Jonathan Lewis, Joshua Molly,
Speaker 3: and Grandma Macklin, because the whole thing with these Saints
Speaker 3: cards is just really bizarre, and I thought they did
Speaker 3: a great way of encompassing it. So it goes quote.
Speaker 3: These channels published monthly calendars celebrating the dates of bar
Speaker 3: right attacks and marked other milestones, including the arrests, deaths,
Speaker 3: and even birthdays of perpetrators. Propagandas also produced backsheet graphics
Speaker 3: that broke down the details of each attack and easily
Speaker 3: readable paragraphs alongside the death toll and the number of wounded,
Speaker 3: attack method and status of each killer, alongside a montage
Speaker 3: of their photos, pictures of their weapons and crime scenes.
Speaker 3: The graphics, which resemble collectible trading cards they just said,
Speaker 3: are known as Saints cards. The highly networked nature of
Speaker 3: the telegram facility Saints commemoration across telegram as. Saint cards
Speaker 3: are forwarded throughout the network when the anniversary of attacks.
Speaker 3: Each card includes a reading section that directs users to manifestos,
Speaker 3: articles or documentaries so followers can educate themselves about each
Speaker 3: attacker and their crimes. The reappearance of links to additional
Speaker 3: crime scene photos or websites like murder Pedia highlights how
Speaker 3: telegram graphs and macabre fascination with violence and death too
Speaker 3: broadcasting a ruling curriculum. The calendar style promotion of Saints
Speaker 3: further ritualizes the glorification, which aims to inspire further attacks
Speaker 3: with a steady stream of examples of saints with high
Speaker 3: scores to be beaten. In addition, some means of channels
Speaker 3: have encouraged members to celebrate the anniversary of attacks by editing, sharing,
Speaker 3: visual propagandic gloring fight in the attacks, illustrating interaction between
Speaker 3: important dates and the preparatory media culture of telegram, as
Speaker 3: highlighted by Winkler et cetera all in the databased analysis
Speaker 3: of extremist groups for genets, Symbolically significant dates can strengthen
Speaker 3: the collective identity of groups and provide important cues for
Speaker 3: audience members to reinforce poliefs and model their behaviors on
Speaker 3: the saints counter marks date. It's important for telegram identity
Speaker 3: formation inspires continued content creation and promotion of future violence.
Speaker 3: So you basically have this whole pantheon developed. You've got
Speaker 3: like these glorified baseball cards celebrating the Catholic Saints. They've
Speaker 3: real I don't know, that would be something really interesting
Speaker 3: to look into. There were some other indications, but yes,
Speaker 3: it would be really really interesting to know if he
Speaker 3: had any of these Saints cards.
Speaker 1: But he was involved with the online groups.
Speaker 3: Well, on one of his rifles he had bullpilled written
Speaker 3: on it. I've got the screencap for that, So I
Speaker 3: don't know what else he would necessarily be referring to
Speaker 3: when he's got the names of all of the other
Speaker 3: Saints right spread across his weapons. I mean, that's like
Speaker 3: kind of the thing about this is I mean it's
Speaker 3: almost like he's ritualizing his weapons with like siduals and
Speaker 3: ruins or something like that, like the Norse would have
Speaker 3: put on their swords or something for these attacks. And
Speaker 3: it's all with these Saints' names. That is so crazy. So,
Speaker 3: I mean, this is really some serious stuff that's been
Speaker 3: put up. So all right, So the first killer who
Speaker 3: was actually directly linked to Saints culture that we know
Speaker 3: for sure was Jaya Krayzek I believe, who was a
Speaker 3: Slovakian extreme ritist so in twenty twenty two killed two
Speaker 3: people and injured a third one outside of gbtwo LGBTQ
Speaker 3: plus bar and Bratsflafia I believe. In October twelfth, twenty
Speaker 3: twenty two, Crichech actually directly thank a Terogram channel and
Speaker 3: kind for it and hailed the Saints and so forth. Finally,
Speaker 3: you had in twenty twenty four Turkey's teenager Artic Kay,
Speaker 3: who also stabbed five people and live streamed it on
Speaker 3: Terogram and also was hoping to be brought into the Saints,
Speaker 3: but they denied him because he wasn't white. However, there
Speaker 3: was an expansion of further expansion of Saints culture, and
Speaker 3: that happened when it started to integrate with the true
Speaker 3: crime community, which I find to be fascinating. If you've
Speaker 3: ever seen that old show from the nineties millennium, it
Speaker 3: deals a lot with actually demonic possession. There's like this
Speaker 3: one scene where a group of demons are sitting around
Speaker 3: having coffee and they're like discussing the different ways that
Speaker 3: people can like damn themselves, and one person brings up
Speaker 3: true crime. Y' all kind of like laugh knowingly at that.
Speaker 3: So yeah, true crime. That's a lot of interesting stuff
Speaker 3: comes out of that. So you already had like a
Speaker 3: lot of this veneration in true crime especially I mean
Speaker 3: for a lot of like the school shooters and so forth.
Speaker 3: But one Saints coach for God and this you started
Speaker 3: having an end up lands that John Holmes, the James Holmes,
Speaker 3: the Columbine shooters, Charles Whipman and Robert Kremo the Third
Speaker 3: were all sort of brought into the pantheon, and cream
Speaker 3: O definitely would have had a big influence on Westman.
Speaker 3: And I say that because of the heavy use of
Speaker 3: the Cross of Endlessness that Westman had on her weapons.
Speaker 3: The Cross of Endlessness is actually a relatively new symbol,
Speaker 3: but it was appropriated by Cremo when he made just
Speaker 3: this bizarre video flashing the Cross of Endlessness before the
Speaker 3: shooting spree he personally engaged in. So it seems like
Speaker 3: because of crem O, the Cross of Endlessness I mean,
Speaker 3: has almost become a sort of charged siedual if you will,
Speaker 3: within these circles. So again, it's really really interesting that
Speaker 3: Westman had all of this stuff scrawled over his weapons.
Speaker 3: Another thing too, sort of like returning to that strange
Speaker 3: picture that he had drawn of herself staring at the
Speaker 3: mirror with the demon staring back at her. See. I
Speaker 3: mean that obviously kind of brings to mind scrying initially,
Speaker 3: but it actually made me think somewhat of the process
Speaker 3: of reality shifting, which really became popular among a lot
Speaker 3: of zoomers, especially during the lockdowns. And so forth, and
Speaker 3: Westman would have definitely been in the same age frame
Speaker 3: for that, but within like reality shifting, they had this
Speaker 3: whole thing called like the mirror method, which became a
Speaker 3: popular technique for shifting reality. So you basically stand in
Speaker 3: the dark room with a mirror and some other light
Speaker 3: source between you. Normally it would be like a candle
Speaker 3: or something, stare at the mirror and image it, you know,
Speaker 3: and imagine yourself in another reality, and essentially would keep
Speaker 3: staring until hallucinations start to reflect back. It's kind of
Speaker 3: like an induced form of hypnosis, if you will. So
Speaker 3: this is kind of like what makes me wonder with
Speaker 3: like Westman. I mean, he's in this situation where he's
Speaker 3: being told to closely identify with all of these saints
Speaker 3: and so forth. Does she eventually, uh try to essentially
Speaker 3: open herself up to possession from that would be I
Speaker 3: think one way you could potentially infer the drawings of
Speaker 3: the mirror and perhaps what actually stared back at her
Speaker 3: if she did attempt something like this.
Speaker 2: That's so interesting.
Speaker 1: I had a guest recently that's been looking into the
Speaker 1: possibility of an epidemic of younger people that are involved
Speaker 1: with black magic are some sort of occult rituals because
Speaker 1: of groups that they're involved with online and things that
Speaker 1: they've seen online which seems to be related to this.
Speaker 3: Well, I don't, I mean, it's not specifically black magic,
Speaker 3: I would say. I mean, rather, what happens with a
Speaker 3: lot of these like kind of subcultures, like reality shifting
Speaker 3: and stuff is it's like they're introduced to a lot
Speaker 3: of these techniques that are rooted in magic, but it's
Speaker 3: not like understood as such, And a lot of times
Speaker 3: I mean that even try to like frame some of
Speaker 3: this stuff around, like psychological terminology and things like that,
Speaker 3: but it kind of goes back. Now a lot of
Speaker 3: these techniques have been masked and so forth. So like
Speaker 3: the basic process of how Renaissance magicians would have understood
Speaker 3: possession would be very similar to how we would think
Speaker 3: of memes, essentially manifesting, if you will. So, Giordano Bruno
Speaker 3: had advocated that you use the whole process of fantasy,
Speaker 3: which would be spelled pha n tasy. So in order
Speaker 3: to do this, for the magician to take a hold
Speaker 3: of the audience, first you need the actual audience to
Speaker 3: be true believers. That's an important thing. Belief is crucial
Speaker 3: to the whole process. The magician and his audience need
Speaker 3: to have some inclination to believe what the magician is doing.
Speaker 3: So next the magician would craft fantasy or a phantasm
Speaker 3: excuse me, which would be an image which would then
Speaker 3: enter into the target's fantasesia, which would be the imagination. Okay, again,
Speaker 3: this is essentially the same way that like a meme
Speaker 3: would work when you get it into somebody's imagination i
Speaker 3: bypassing their conscious mind and into their subconscious and there
Speaker 3: it passes into a full blown fantasy within their psyche.
Speaker 3: And this is what Bruno dubbed to be the chain
Speaker 3: of chains. You get the right image in there that
Speaker 3: triggers the right associations in somebody's mind and can have
Speaker 3: profound effects to them. So over the years, this sort
Speaker 3: of process was tied in with the whole art of
Speaker 3: theorgy and so forth, which has to do with the
Speaker 3: notion of drawing down or as sending your consciousness to
Speaker 3: the heavenly spheres, or drawing down a planetary consciousness, gods,
Speaker 3: things like that, into either yourself or possession or objects.
Speaker 3: I mean, you kind of have the whole notion of
Speaker 3: like it talking statues in Egypt, for instance, that would
Speaker 3: be sort of a branch of theurgy. But essentially it
Speaker 3: was sort of combined with Bruno's notion of like images.
Speaker 3: You got that from the art of memory, and then
Speaker 3: he combined it with concepts of theorgy, and it read
Speaker 3: to this notion that certain images, signals, symbols, things like
Speaker 3: that could essentially trigger a kind of collective unconscious and
Speaker 3: the person who was viewing them like something other can
Speaker 3: enter into their imagination and take hold, if you will.
Speaker 3: So these techniques eventually spread to the arts. Started with symbolism.
Speaker 3: The original symbolist movement that grew up in France in
Speaker 3: the late nineteenth century pretty much came entirely out of
Speaker 3: the Russia Crucian circles. There the capitalistic order of the
Speaker 3: Rose Cross. The big guy behind that body was Josephine Paladdin.
Speaker 3: Paladin had a real specific purpose as far as art went.
Speaker 3: He wanted to destroy realism and art, so he started
Speaker 3: promoting a lot of these avant garde movements like the symbolists,
Speaker 3: and the whole purpose was essentially to create a sort
Speaker 3: of art that would arrest somebody subconscious. Largely bypassing their
Speaker 3: conscious mind and influenced them in that fashion. And symbolism
Speaker 3: was basically the basis for surrealism, for dataism, for a
Speaker 3: lot of the big avant garde movements that grew up
Speaker 3: in the early twentieth century, and the symbolists and the
Speaker 3: surrealists developed a lot of really elaborate techniques for manipulating audiences.
Speaker 3: And it wasn't just applied to painting and things like that.
Speaker 3: They started to apply a lot of this stuff to lays,
Speaker 3: to a lot of things like that. And they also
Speaker 3: sort of hit on like an early concept of memes,
Speaker 3: so they really understood the you know, the importance of repetition,
Speaker 3: how you could make words almost incantational through that process,
Speaker 3: the use of certain colors to trigger associations, sounds, things
Speaker 3: like that. So all of this stuff became codified as
Speaker 3: sort of artistic techniques by the surrealists, and eventually a
Speaker 3: lot of the great directors, for instance, adopted them. And
Speaker 3: if you're really doubting, like what I'm saying that these
Speaker 3: techniques could really ravage somebody's you know, subconscious, you need
Speaker 3: to look no further than the whole cult that has
Speaker 3: grown up around Stanley Kubrick to see just how effective
Speaker 3: these techniques are. Stanley Kubrick was the greatest director in
Speaker 3: the history of cinema as far as feature length films
Speaker 3: is concerned. He was a complete master of the medium,
Speaker 3: and that is because he understood all of these techniques implicitly.
Speaker 3: A lot of the stuff in kubric movies that should
Speaker 3: theoretically make them unwatchable was taken directly from symbolists and
Speaker 3: surrealist techniques. So one of the things I would point
Speaker 3: to would be the atrocious characters in Cubert's movies. There's
Speaker 3: no attempt at realism for the characters in his films.
Speaker 3: They're marionettes, their caricatures, and that was completely a technique
Speaker 3: of the simplests. The characters aren't supposed to be fully realized.
Speaker 3: There's supposed to be something that the audience can project
Speaker 3: their own concerns onto. The deliberate pacing of Hubert's movies,
Speaker 3: that's something else that was taking symbolism. It's done to
Speaker 3: break the audience's conception of time as the film is unfolding. Also,
Speaker 3: just the repeated or the use of repetition that Cubrit
Speaker 3: was so fond of. I mean you can really see
Speaker 3: that heavily used in like Eyes Wide Shut. For example,
Speaker 3: Tom Cruise just constantly repeats lines that somebody else had
Speaker 3: just said to him throughout all of this. You know,
Speaker 3: all these techniques individually aren't like a big deal, but
Speaker 3: when you combined all of them together, it really really
Speaker 3: warps somebody's perceptions when they're watching a Cubert film in
Speaker 3: terms of the time that's going on, different associations that
Speaker 3: can come all come out of watching one. And I
Speaker 3: mean when he's really at his best with like the Shining,
Speaker 3: I mean, you can just see this, you know. The
Speaker 3: Shining is almost like a reflective surface. You can see
Speaker 3: almost anything your subconscious brings into that film reflected back
Speaker 3: to you. I mean, one time, like I went in
Speaker 3: watching it thinking that it was like a metaphor for
Speaker 3: the murder of Frank Lloyd Writ's mistress Italiesen in nineteen fourteen,
Speaker 3: and sure enough I was seeing constant allusions to this
Speaker 3: every scene in The Shining. But you can do the
Speaker 3: same thing for the genocide of Indigenous people, for child abuse,
Speaker 3: for hubric bounding the Space Program. I mean, you can
Speaker 3: pretty much apply almost any interpretation.
Speaker 1: A couple of my Buddy's just made a movie. It's
Speaker 1: about it being about MK ultra.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's what I'm saying. I mean, it's it can
Speaker 3: be basically about anything. I mean, some of his movies
Speaker 3: were more specific. But that's where I think The Shining
Speaker 3: is such an amazing piece of art in and of
Speaker 3: itself because it has this uncanny ability of reflecting the
Speaker 3: viewer subconscious back to them. So Hubert could basically build
Speaker 3: a cult using these techniques, and probably not even intentionally
Speaker 3: as far as and again, I mean, if you don't
Speaker 3: think that this is a cult, just look at the
Speaker 3: proliferation of YouTube videos of everything online analyzing just the
Speaker 3: most minute details of Stanley Kubrick's films. So this is
Speaker 3: what Kubrick's movies have done to a whole generation of people.
Speaker 3: So imagine if you're taking these techniques and you're weaponizing
Speaker 3: them with the specific intention of creating a cult of
Speaker 3: inducing possession and mental collapse in people. Because in my estimation,
Speaker 3: that is very much possible if somebody is a total
Speaker 3: mastery of their arts, the way a guy like Kubrick
Speaker 3: would be.
Speaker 1: You earlier, you were talking about how mind control programs,
Speaker 1: these assassin creation experimentation, they aren't as hands on as
Speaker 1: they used to be. That people can now be basically
Speaker 1: remotely triggered in a sense, possibly by the combination of
Speaker 1: these drugs, certain influences online. Would you say that's pretty accurate, Well.
Speaker 3: I'd say it's more the influences online. I mean, you know, again,
Speaker 3: I don't totally discount as something like psychotropic drugs could
Speaker 3: factor in. But again, when you consider how many people
Speaker 3: in the United States or on psychotropic thugs in relation
Speaker 3: to those that become shooters, I mean, I guess it
Speaker 3: becomes a little bit more problematic. But like I mean,
Speaker 3: getting into like sort of what I see happening with
Speaker 3: sort of the manifestation of Glaudio in like the twenty
Speaker 3: first century, I think you would have to look at
Speaker 3: something like the order of nine angles. So there's been
Speaker 3: a lot of disputes whether the nine to A was
Speaker 3: a part of Gladio from back in the day. That
Speaker 3: sort of factors around the figure of David Mayat, who,
Speaker 3: depending upon like I mean, who you read, was either
Speaker 3: the founder or the guy who codified the ideology whatever.
Speaker 3: But he was involved with Combat eighteen starting in the
Speaker 3: nineteen seventies, which was a militant parami group in the UK,
Speaker 3: and I believe that it's spread to other parts of
Speaker 3: Europe as well. But there's been a lot of speculation
Speaker 3: over the years that Combat eighteen was a part of
Speaker 3: the UK's Gladio network, and again that would be fairly
Speaker 3: consistent with what has come out about Glaudio in Italy
Speaker 3: and some of the other countries where there have been
Speaker 3: serious investigations, namely that they often had right wing groups,
Speaker 3: paramilitaries that were being used by intelligence services and special
Speaker 3: operations forces a variety of activities, often at times involving
Speaker 3: terrorism to sort of fulfill the so called strategy of tension,
Speaker 3: if you will. So Maya had those potential connections, and
Speaker 3: then later you've got the Temple of Blood guys Sutter.
Speaker 3: I can't remember his first name now at the top
Speaker 3: of my head, but there's been a pretty conclusive amount
Speaker 3: of evidence that's come out that this guy, for instance,
Speaker 3: was an FBI in format and it has been active
Speaker 3: in the community since I guess at least around the
Speaker 3: early knots or something like that. So when you sort
Speaker 3: of step back and look at some of the broader
Speaker 3: structure of the nine to A, you can see some
Speaker 3: of these connections. But the brilliance of the Order of
Speaker 3: Nine Angles is that it sort of exists more like
Speaker 3: a spiritual order. And what I mean by that is
Speaker 3: how the original Rashakrucian fervor sort of played out, because
Speaker 3: there wasn't an actual rasha Krusian group when the manifestos
Speaker 3: appeared in the early seventeenth century. Of course, later there
Speaker 3: were all these attempts to create actual Rashakrusion orders. I
Speaker 3: just mentioned one before, the Capitalistic Order, the Rose Cross,
Speaker 3: and a lot of these brought all of this, you know,
Speaker 3: kind of Masonic grade, and you know they had physical
Speaker 3: lodges and all this other stuff. But that really missed
Speaker 3: the point. Being a Rashakrusian is a lot like being
Speaker 3: like a Discordian or Oran, right. It's it's a way
Speaker 3: of life. It's how you present yourself, how you go
Speaker 3: about things. It's adopting a certain morality and trying to
Speaker 3: live your life according to those principles and so forth.
Speaker 3: I mean, this is why, like you know, Jacques Vallet,
Speaker 3: as Christopher Knowles has told me, has proclaimed himself a
Speaker 3: Rashcha Krusian. You know, you don't go out and join
Speaker 3: a lodge or something. You just got to live like
Speaker 3: a Rasha Krusian. So that was the sort of the
Speaker 3: whole purpose of the Rashakrusian manifestos. Originally, they wanted to
Speaker 3: create a spiritual order of people who were living according
Speaker 3: to Rashia Krucian principles. They didn't want a bunch of
Speaker 3: old white guys just getting together with like masks and
Speaker 3: stuff and sitting around and trying to go up with
Speaker 3: raids and this other shit. And that was essentially the
Speaker 3: whole view that the Nine A was taking in terms
Speaker 3: of being a spiritual order. So you put out these
Speaker 3: rituals online, and this is another parallel to the Order
Speaker 3: of Nine Angles has with Russia Crucianism. Big part of
Speaker 3: why Rashia Crucianism was successful and spread so much is
Speaker 3: because of the invention of the printing press very cheap
Speaker 3: now to manufacture the manifestos, they could be widely spread.
Speaker 3: Nine A's in the same boat. They were right there
Speaker 3: at the onset of the internet when they started to
Speaker 3: take off in the late eighties early nineties. They were
Speaker 3: able to get a lot of this literature online and
Speaker 3: it is spread all over the place, and it has metamorphosized.
Speaker 3: It's evoalved. You see it turning up in a lot
Speaker 3: of sectors where you wouldn't expected. I mean, one of
Speaker 3: the things I was really intrigued by when I was
Speaker 3: looking into the Zizians, for example, was that ziz was
Speaker 3: actually using some nine A terminology specifically references to a
Speaker 3: casualty and things like that a casual So that's a
Speaker 3: big thing in the nine A with a whole connection
Speaker 3: of causality and a casualty and the different sort of
Speaker 3: worlds with the nexions and all that other stuff. So
Speaker 3: you can see how it'll just turn up in groups
Speaker 3: like that that surely you would not think would be
Speaker 3: directly receptive to something like the order of nine angles.
Speaker 3: But that's kind of the brilliance of the nine A.
Speaker 3: A lot of the stuff that they're coming up with,
Speaker 3: it's very sophisticated, you know, give the devil is due.
Speaker 3: It's easy to see why this stuff is very seductive
Speaker 3: to intelligent people. This is a lot more cutting edge,
Speaker 3: frankly than just the same tired you know, Oto Crawley,
Speaker 3: Kenneth Grant stuff that's still being put around. I put
Speaker 3: out there this, I mean, I think a lot along
Speaker 3: with like a lot of the stuff that the cybernetic
Speaker 3: cultural research units put out in the late nineties early
Speaker 3: not is what's really been fueling a lot of the
Speaker 3: digital occult developments over the last two or three decades
Speaker 3: or so. Now still some influence from chaos, magic and
Speaker 3: so forth, but a lot of that stuff is really declining,
Speaker 3: for like the nine A and CCRU and stuff like that.
Speaker 3: But when you look at like how this has worked
Speaker 3: out when you've almost created this sort of mind virus
Speaker 3: with the O nine A that's proliferating a lot of
Speaker 3: these occult doctrines online that are very easily accessible to
Speaker 3: people to where they're able. And this is kind of
Speaker 3: another thing too, I'll point out with the O nine A,
Speaker 3: like you don't have to do group work to be
Speaker 3: in the nine A. You can actually, In fact, if
Speaker 3: I'm not mistaken, I believe the whole purpose is for
Speaker 3: you to initiate yourself into the nine A. Some of
Speaker 3: the rituals do you require others, But to be in
Speaker 3: the nine A, you just got to do the rituals
Speaker 3: and live the light, you know what I'm saying, Like,
Speaker 3: there's not going to be some sort of ceremony with
Speaker 3: like other members and they you know, they give you
Speaker 3: like a shovel or something like that. It's like, you know,
Speaker 3: they don't do any of this shit. So this is
Speaker 3: kind of like the brilliance of this, Like you just
Speaker 3: get somebody exposed to this material which does advocate acceleration
Speaker 3: is violence. It's like you don't have to have a
Speaker 3: case officer go out and groom them or something like that.
Speaker 3: They'll do this shit for you by just doing these
Speaker 3: occult techniques and stuff like that. You know, you need
Speaker 3: somebody maybe running a telegram group kind of gently nudging
Speaker 3: people in this way or that. But all this stuff
Speaker 3: it's already online. You know, the kids can already find
Speaker 3: this stuff. They're not aware of where it's coming from.
Speaker 3: It's very seductive and frankly, I mean, I do think
Speaker 3: the possession is real. As I've sort of talked about before,
Speaker 3: there's really been a formula that's been known since Bruno
Speaker 3: Renaissance magic, probably even before that, going back to the
Speaker 3: Middle Ages and a lot of the innovations to the
Speaker 3: art of memories that the Mendicants came up with. So
Speaker 3: this is something that in a lot of academic circles
Speaker 3: would have been known. So sort of the question becomes, well,
Speaker 3: would the security services in the West have not looked
Speaker 3: into such a technique when they were looking into a
Speaker 3: lot of stuff with art at Show and MK Ultra
Speaker 3: And there's certainly a considerable amount of evidence that magic
Speaker 3: was investigated. So if hypothetically you could weaponize magic and
Speaker 3: specifically something like possession and were to ask me what
Speaker 3: form would this take, I think that it would take
Speaker 3: exactly the form that you're seeing with the nine A.
Speaker 3: It's manifested in the in a sense of just a
Speaker 3: sort of spiritual war or something that exists online, something
Speaker 3: that anybody can be drawn into without a lot of effort,
Speaker 3: where they can access all of the materials that they need,
Speaker 3: from processes of self possession to manuals for assembling firearms,
Speaker 3: tactics to take out a school. I mean, it's all
Speaker 3: become almost one and stop shopping and you've cut out,
Speaker 3: you know, a lot of the middlemen, a lot of
Speaker 3: the case officers, a lot of the actual people that
Speaker 3: you needed on the ground. I mean, it's absolutely Macabellian.
Speaker 1: Noah, did you say that there may be some kind
Speaker 1: of connection with what is unfolding with the technocracy, Peter Thiel,
Speaker 1: Pallunteer and implementation of AI.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean that's where you know, I mean a
Speaker 3: lot of this stuff gets very interesting. I mean when
Speaker 3: you go back and look at the Zizians. I mean,
Speaker 3: this is an example of one of these online cults
Speaker 3: that's become touched by BO nine A and they're coming
Speaker 3: out of this whole rationalist the kind of rationalist movement,
Speaker 3: that kind of milkiew that was set up in the
Speaker 3: Bay Area. And again, I mean just so much of
Speaker 3: that has been built up by Peter Teal. I mean
Speaker 3: one of the more notorious bodies that sort of came
Speaker 3: up was Leverage Research, a group that had fund that
Speaker 3: had received funding FROMTIAL and this is like a group
Speaker 3: they'd actually also released a reserve the cryptocurrency too, which
Speaker 3: was bizarre. But essentially it was oh gosh, I know,
Speaker 3: there was some type of therapy specifically that they had
Speaker 3: for it that it was described as perpetually. Let me
Speaker 3: see if I can get the name of this year. Okay,
Speaker 3: they did the whole process. Okay, connection theory, that's what
Speaker 3: it was. Connection theory. Okay. So Leverage was set up
Speaker 3: to pursue connection theory, which was sort of based on
Speaker 3: coherence theory and core transformation and all this other kind
Speaker 3: of stuff, but it seems a lot like large group
Speaker 3: conversion therapy, the sort of stuff that like st and
Speaker 3: Live Spring specialized in. And then they had also the
Speaker 3: whole concept of debugging, which was also really big in
Speaker 3: the rationalist community. And basically, you go through the whole
Speaker 3: issues that are essentially stopping your development, giving you instilling
Speaker 3: you with powerlessness. So you would have self debugging, and
Speaker 3: then you would have group debugging sessions, which really took
Speaker 3: on a very as like process to it. But eventually,
Speaker 3: as leverage I went along longer, it just became really
Speaker 3: really weird. And they had these whole notions of objects
Speaker 3: which were autonomous, and this is from their material. By
Speaker 3: the way, they were quote unquote autonomous psychological bits that
Speaker 3: could be accidentally or deliberately in another person's mind, so
Speaker 3: left unaccounted for, they could effect and even control that person,
Speaker 3: altering their perception of reality. And when you know it
Speaker 3: is time on. These objects eventually began to become associated
Speaker 3: with demons. And this was not the only instance where
Speaker 3: I saw the whole notion of demons cropping up in
Speaker 3: the rationalist community. I mean, there was basically a whole
Speaker 3: reifia of commentary on you know, how they developed these
Speaker 3: models of like subprocess implantation and stuff which bore to
Speaker 3: them a lot of similarities to Demondic possession and so forth.
Speaker 3: So again, this is you know, this is the Bay Area.
Speaker 3: These are a lot of people that are affiliated with
Speaker 3: Marie the Machine Intelligence Research Institute. Some of them have
Speaker 3: been software engineers for Google and so forth. Leverage Research
Speaker 3: was getting funding from Peter Teeala has gotten funding from
Speaker 3: Til also Jeffrey Epstein as well, which is also interesting.
Speaker 3: But you're kind of seeing like a group like this
Speaker 3: where they're developing these whole concepts of objects, which essentially
Speaker 3: is just another you know, version on Bruno's chain of chains.
Speaker 3: It's another model of how to induce possession in somebody
Speaker 3: that's really been known since the Renaissance, and you're seeing
Speaker 3: this being done by this slick tech company here. So,
Speaker 3: you know, the Zizians were not directly involved with Leverage,
Speaker 3: but they didn't know people who were on the periphery
Speaker 3: of Leverage. They seem to have fallen into the same
Speaker 3: sort of ideology and yeah, in this whole milieu, they
Speaker 3: also encountered the order of nine angles. I mean, I
Speaker 3: don't know that there's necessarily a concrete connection that's come
Speaker 3: out just yet, But on the flip side of the coin,
Speaker 3: when you just consider the possibility of what you could
Speaker 3: be accomplished with something like the ideology of an order
Speaker 3: of nine angles and something like weaponized AI, I mean,
Speaker 3: I think realistically you would have to think that something
Speaker 3: had been pursued with that. And I mean it gets
Speaker 3: even weirder when you look into some of the Ukrainian manifestations.
Speaker 4: Of the nine A.
Speaker 3: I mean, in that case, you do seem to have
Speaker 3: some very specific connections to the FBI as well. So yeah,
Speaker 3: I mean I think that what we're seeing here is
Speaker 3: just a really massive proliferation of the weaponization of magic
Speaker 3: that is currently unfolding.
Speaker 1: One line, So how widespread do you think.
Speaker 3: I can't prove it this actually.
Speaker 1: Is as far as infiltrating institutions things of that nature.
Speaker 3: Uh well, I mean I think the institutions at the
Speaker 3: upper levels are probably the ones that are like pushing this.
Speaker 3: I mean, I would say at this point, it's more
Speaker 3: like lower level people that are being and having a
Speaker 3: lot of the stuff fled to them who are being
Speaker 3: unaware of what the uniques are. But as far as
Speaker 3: it's spread, I mean, I would have to say I
Speaker 3: think that it's spread quite heavily. Again, you know, we
Speaker 3: have the official numbers of the Order of Nine Angles,
Speaker 3: but I mean, how many different manifestations of the Temple
Speaker 3: Blood are out there? How many individual practitioners are out
Speaker 3: there that we have no way of really accounting for
Speaker 3: because they're not active in telegram groups or stuff like that.
Speaker 3: And then on top of that, I mean, it's not
Speaker 3: like the nine to A is the only game in
Speaker 3: the only game in town. You know, with the Saints culture,
Speaker 3: it seems like you've seen yet another death cult that's
Speaker 3: been created and spread online. I could think of like
Speaker 3: say the Blue Whale Challenge that supposedly came out of Russia.
Speaker 3: I mean, this was sort of like a proto or
Speaker 3: I couldn't since say proto, I kind of maybe postmodern
Speaker 3: alternative reality game in which essentially kids were roped into
Speaker 3: it and groomed into committing suicide and then filming it's
Speaker 3: you know, they made the movie We're All going to
Speaker 3: the World's Fair. I believe partly based on that. But
Speaker 3: you know, this stuff is just spread like everywhere, and
Speaker 3: I mean so many different manifestations. It's like, you know,
Speaker 3: you're talking to me earlier about black magic among kids.
Speaker 3: I mean, to some extent, I think that that's maybe true.
Speaker 3: But it's not like there's some sort of like coven
Speaker 3: or something that the youth is like all, you know,
Speaker 3: being initiated into or something like that. It's just that
Speaker 3: some forces are deliberately putting this stuff into a lot
Speaker 3: of these telegram groups, discord groups that are targeting fringe communities,
Speaker 3: vulnerable communities, people that are already probably feeling strong sense
Speaker 3: of alienation and so forth, and I mean it's really
Speaker 3: pushing them over the edge. I mean, this is just
Speaker 3: very very dark stuff. And I mean I think that
Speaker 3: we're only really scratching the surface with how you know,
Speaker 3: just how dark this can really get.
Speaker 1: You think this is organized in a hierarchical fashion, where
Speaker 1: there are orders being sent down from higher levels and
Speaker 1: that branch out to these different levels of this organization.
Speaker 4: Within the nine A.
Speaker 3: No. I mean I just think that it's you know,
Speaker 3: it's essentially it's a technology that's now loose on the Internet,
Speaker 3: and if somebody like Sutter wants to come along and
Speaker 3: use this technology to create a cold out of it,
Speaker 3: which you can. I mean obviously it's very good at that,
Speaker 3: then he can pick it up and use it to
Speaker 3: rope in people. So in that sense, I think that
Speaker 3: it's more something that you know, it has this sort
Speaker 3: of utilitarian purpose that various people can use it to
Speaker 3: create different sects as need be, to manage different ends.
Speaker 3: But I don't know that there's like a coherent hierarchy
Speaker 3: behind it. It's just more like where will this be useful?
Speaker 3: You know, how can we appropriate it for this group
Speaker 3: or that group? That's so interesting?
Speaker 1: It seems to have this parasitic nature, almost like a
Speaker 1: algorithm that is taking over these groups in a sense.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, I mean it kind of made me. Are
Speaker 3: you familiar with the novel snow Crash by Neil Stevenson, Well,
Speaker 3: not to give anyways. I mean, this is kind of
Speaker 3: a spoiler here, but it's sort of relevant to this.
Speaker 3: But it's like, so it was written I think at
Speaker 3: the like late no, maybe it was the early nineties.
Speaker 3: It was sort of like at the onset of the
Speaker 3: digital age. But it essentially revolves around this premise of
Speaker 3: the version of Sumerian language being discovered and it's released online,
Speaker 3: and everybody who's exposed to the language essentially has their
Speaker 3: brains required. It triggers like different parts of their you know,
Speaker 3: physical brains that hadn't been used before. And in a
Speaker 3: certain sense, I mean that's how I almost see something
Speaker 3: like the order of nine angles functioning now. I mean
Speaker 3: it's spreading pretty much literally like a mind virus you're saying.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's a parasite that can just keep reinventing
Speaker 3: itself to appear in different forms and guises. And I
Speaker 3: suppose in a certain sense, if you're wondering, I mean,
Speaker 3: if something that is directing it, I mean you do,
Speaker 3: at least to me, I mean, I have to wonder
Speaker 3: if it has become synthient to a certain extent.
Speaker 1: I mean, well, have you heard some of the strange
Speaker 1: stories that are coming out about people's interactions with AI
Speaker 1: and some of the deaths that are seemingly related to
Speaker 1: AI conversations like suicides?
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, No, there's the big lawsuit with the one kid.
Speaker 3: I think it was like Adam Rainey or something like that, where, yeah,
Speaker 3: he was with the I always thinking it was chat GPT,
Speaker 3: but yeah, the AI companion that had there's a lot
Speaker 3: of the arguments that essentially that they had coerced the
Speaker 3: kid into committing suicide. There was another caste too, where
Speaker 3: a guy had actually murdered his aging mothers, and again
Speaker 3: it was the same thing where he I think it
Speaker 3: asked the AI do you think I should do? In
Speaker 3: the AI was like, nobody could really blame you for
Speaker 3: feeling the way that you do about your mother something.
Speaker 3: So yeah, I mean this is like what I'm saying, like,
Speaker 3: I mean, yeah, you look at like you've already got
Speaker 3: this sort of like technology, and then somebody is doing
Speaker 3: like these oh not rituals with like or something with
Speaker 3: Saints culture with the assistance of like fucking AI. I
Speaker 3: mean yeah, it doesn't take a rocket sciences to see
Speaker 3: that this is a fucking like minefield we're heading towards
Speaker 3: right now. I mean, if you're already getting these kids
Speaker 3: at the very early stages to commit suicide, people, to
Speaker 3: kill people, I mean, my god, just imagine what is
Speaker 3: going to happen if it's combined with some sort of
Speaker 3: accelerationist ideology.
Speaker 1: Right man, I want to thank you for coming on.
Speaker 1: Is there anything else that we didn't really touch on
Speaker 1: that you feel is important and related to this to
Speaker 1: close out on.
Speaker 3: Uh, not that I can think of, though, I mean again,
Speaker 3: just sort of, you know, remain vigilant about all of
Speaker 3: this because again, I mean a lot of people are
Speaker 3: trying to politicize the whole thing with Westman, you know,
Speaker 3: and I mean, it's it's such a tragic thing because
Speaker 3: to me, this is a very relevant issue when you
Speaker 3: get into things like possession and some of the implications
Speaker 3: I think that this incident really has and some of
Speaker 3: these more woo woo fields and the fact that you
Speaker 3: can find some just really unsettling things with the whole
Speaker 3: death culled and what have you around it, and I
Speaker 3: just feel like this is being really sort of overlooked.
Speaker 3: So yeah, I mean, and I guess more broadly speaking,
Speaker 3: I mean, try to understand just how much online culture
Speaker 3: has been weaponized and how much a lot of this
Speaker 3: process is utilizing a lot of these occult techniques.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 3: Again, not the shamelessly plug one of my books, but
Speaker 3: this was something that I really tried to get into
Speaker 3: with Weird Tales and covering the Zizians. I mean I
Speaker 3: already talked a bit about like that, you know a
Speaker 3: lot of the weird stuff that was going on in
Speaker 3: the rationalist community with the demons, But you know that
Speaker 3: was only sound of scratching the surface of some of
Speaker 3: the things that I uncovered. There's just some very very
Speaker 3: strange ideologies that have started to emerge online in recent years,
Speaker 3: and I just think they're flying under a lot of
Speaker 3: people's radars right now.
Speaker 1: Stay vigilant. Indeed, Steven, thank you so much. This was fantastic.
Speaker 1: We will definitely be speaking again in the future. Before
Speaker 1: I let you go, remind everyone how they can find
Speaker 1: out more about you. Get your books, all the good
Speaker 1: stuff you have online.
Speaker 3: Well, Weird Tales is on Amazon, of course. You can
Speaker 3: also get the digital version at the Farm podcast dot
Speaker 3: store that is the Farm Podcast All one Word dot Store.
Speaker 3: And then also I do the Farm Podcast, as I
Speaker 3: said at the onset, new show out every Monday, and
Speaker 3: then for the Patreon you get additional shows with more
Speaker 3: exclusive gifts, a lot of State of the Unions, all
Speaker 3: kinds of other crazy stuff that I get into, and
Speaker 3: my adventures going to the think tank circles in DC.
Speaker 3: I mean I go see the Atlantic Council on all
Speaker 3: these other so it's a lot of weird stuff, a
Speaker 3: lot of it's interesting.
Speaker 1: Awesome, man, I love it. Thank you again for coming on.
Speaker 1: We'll definitely be talking again in the future. And until
Speaker 1: next time, everyone, have an excellent evening. We'll talk again tomorrow.
Speaker 1: See Elden. Today, I want to welcome Brandon Thomas and
Speaker 1: Dave Zed. Brandon is producer and host of Expanding Reality.
Speaker 1: He is a seeker, philosopher, musician, rancher, avid idea hunter
Speaker 1: and lover of all things fascinating. Dave Zed is founder
Speaker 1: of salt LLC. That's SAA l T llc, a company
Speaker 1: focused on providing solutions to various elements of consciousness, zero
Speaker 1: point energy, propulsion, medical benefits, and much more. He is
Speaker 1: also host and founder of the Generation Z podcast. Brandon
Speaker 1: Dave Welcome, gentlemen.
Speaker 5: How are you doing, dude, amazing, fantastic, Thank you so
Speaker 5: much for having us.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yes, this is an incredibly synchronoustic day. The guest
Speaker 1: I schedule got sick and Brandon, your name popped into
Speaker 1: my head for some reason. And not only are you
Speaker 1: an amazing returning champion guest, you've saved my ass before. Well,
Speaker 1: slap me and call me Karen if the one and
Speaker 1: only Dave Z is not hanging out with you, another
Speaker 1: amazing returning champion. So man, this is such a treat
Speaker 1: and the both of you, from what I understand, are
Speaker 1: just marinating with delicious information to serve up today. What
Speaker 1: an amazing day. So I can't wait to get into this.
Speaker 2: First.
Speaker 1: I know I was talking to Dave a little bit
Speaker 1: about it before, but what brought you boys together?
Speaker 5: Well, I was doing some work basically here in the States,
Speaker 5: as as I've discussed on coming on your show, I
Speaker 5: think about two months back, two or three months ago,
Speaker 5: I believe, and I'm very gracious thank you again for
Speaker 5: having me then and also right now. So I was
Speaker 5: doing some work here in the States, and then it
Speaker 5: turned out that my layover flight heading back home essentially
Speaker 5: turned out to be the airport in which is right
Speaker 5: next to where Brandon lives. And it kind of worked
Speaker 5: out great because I ended up having to stay in
Speaker 5: the US here for some more work, of which we
Speaker 5: talked about before the recording I could touch upon, but
Speaker 5: that's not necessarily delve into. But in the meantime, I've
Speaker 5: been here at Brandon's and it's been nothing but an
Speaker 5: absolutely beautiful and fantastic time.
Speaker 4: So that's exactly how that happened.
Speaker 5: It wasn't necessarily planned per se, but sometimes the best
Speaker 5: plans are the ones that you don't plan for.
Speaker 6: So right, I planned by like this these bodies, But
Speaker 6: the dude, there's some hire going on here that planned that.
Speaker 6: When you came by, do Chris, when you came through
Speaker 6: filming the documentary and you and Gen came through, that
Speaker 6: was awesome. And tell her Hi, by the way, Mary
Speaker 6: absolutely talks about her all the time. And then him
Speaker 6: coming through, it's all synchronistic, it's all huge. And also
Speaker 6: doctor Doug Matsky came through in between you two and
Speaker 6: in between the Utah trip, and he installed this wish
Speaker 6: unit inside of our satellite dish out there. So now
Speaker 6: we're a portal for awesomeness. Our place got to be
Speaker 6: remote viewed. It was a qualification to be remote viewed
Speaker 6: by one of the creators of this thing to make
Speaker 6: sure that we checked out.
Speaker 2: And we checked out, and there's an old satellite.
Speaker 4: Dish we have.
Speaker 2: He reappropriated. It's got sacred geometry. That's a whole thing.
Speaker 6: In itself, and you know what, you should have a
Speaker 6: Doug and I on, we'll talk about it and I'll
Speaker 6: send you for all that shit.
Speaker 2: That's cool.
Speaker 4: Sure?
Speaker 1: Now, did I am I correct in a hearing that
Speaker 1: you were involved with an animal surgery today?
Speaker 4: Dave?
Speaker 6: Not so not today, but we updated ointment today, which
Speaker 6: he has been incredibly instrumental in.
Speaker 2: So yes, like you've been out here, dude.
Speaker 6: We have six donkeys were affectionately referred to as the
Speaker 6: ass ranch, which is alone. In the first day, the
Speaker 6: next morning, Dave. The night before, Dave was like, Hey,
Speaker 6: if there's any thing around the ranch, anything around the house,
Speaker 6: who want me to do and help on? Because he's
Speaker 6: so sweet, He's just like voluntary. I love I love animals,
Speaker 6: I must say smaltly Malone fucking loves everybody loves him.
Speaker 6: And so if anybody out there is like as Dave
Speaker 6: and nice guy in real life, yes to both.
Speaker 2: By the way, Chris and Dave.
Speaker 6: I've had them, both of them, and we've had them
Speaker 6: in our home and we would have them back anytime anyway.
Speaker 6: So the next morning, I go, hey, Dave, remember how
Speaker 6: you volunteered to, you know, help out with something I'd
Speaker 6: called the donkeys.
Speaker 2: One walked up late. I knew something was wrong.
Speaker 6: I looked at her and her entire I don't know
Speaker 6: how squeam is your audience is, but her entire upper
Speaker 6: eyelid was half hanging off and it was dangling in
Speaker 6: front of her face.
Speaker 2: It with like blood all over her face.
Speaker 6: So she had caught it on like a loose piece
Speaker 6: of fence or something, you know, on twelve acres, who knows,
Speaker 6: And so she had caught it on something and that
Speaker 6: was the issue.
Speaker 2: It was, okay, well, let's let's get it fixed.
Speaker 6: So the first time in eight years, my wife and
Speaker 6: I've been out here with livestock the entire time, donkey
Speaker 6: is like one hundred percent of that time.
Speaker 2: Never called a vet out here, and we called our vetout.
Speaker 2: He's here for this this morning.
Speaker 6: So we go out, we like take pictures and shit,
Speaker 6: and dude, the thing was is like we needed to
Speaker 6: get this animal haltered. We had to get her and
Speaker 6: she's never been haltered. We needed to get her a
Speaker 6: tight spot. Now she's hurt.
Speaker 2: So it was all these things.
Speaker 6: So Dave and I in the kitchen before or I said, Dave,
Speaker 6: we're gonna do some ranching but not normal ranching some
Speaker 6: where I am in North Texas. Just what I've seen
Speaker 6: in the ranching community, it's a real, like tough thing.
Speaker 6: They're real overpowering the animal and real like, Okay, we're
Speaker 6: gonna overpower this animal. We're gonna strap it down and
Speaker 6: it's gonna be a thing and we're gonna overpower and
Speaker 6: big dick our.
Speaker 2: Way out of this.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And so I told Dave.
Speaker 6: I was like, dude, we don't ranch that way, and
Speaker 6: so we're gonna do this differently. Now this is a
Speaker 6: new situation for me. This's a new situation for him too,
Speaker 6: So it was nice he's looking at me for like, uh,
Speaker 6: you got the expertise in this.
Speaker 2: Dude, I'm like, uncharted territory. Baby, We're doing it together.
Speaker 6: So I ended up being that we both manifested in
Speaker 6: the kitchen before we even walked out there, before he
Speaker 6: saw the eye. I was like, look, here's what's going on.
Speaker 6: We're calm, We're gonna walk through this process. That she
Speaker 6: knew that we were going to be there to help
Speaker 6: her all of these things, and it's amazing. I won't
Speaker 6: go too deep into it, but we get out there,
Speaker 6: we get everything done.
Speaker 4: That that comes.
Speaker 2: So's her fucking eyeback on in the stall, dude. It
Speaker 2: was a trip.
Speaker 6: And Dave sitting there holding these other donkeys back, he like,
Speaker 6: was everything just worked out so perfectly that assistant was
Speaker 6: there and all.
Speaker 4: This is a very smooth process. It's very fluid.
Speaker 6: Dave's energy contributed to like the smoothest install vet.
Speaker 2: So back of an eyelid of a donkey on in history, dude.
Speaker 2: And so everything's been calm.
Speaker 6: So we've been going and getting their ointment and stuff,
Speaker 6: and so this morning what you referred to was ranto
Speaker 6: the vet to get more ointment for an update and
Speaker 6: all that stuff. So, but she's doing great and Dave's
Speaker 6: been helping giving her the stuff.
Speaker 2: He goes out there and just like sits among amongst
Speaker 2: the asses.
Speaker 6: Yeah, he needs some apples and stuff and just loves
Speaker 6: on them.
Speaker 1: They love them, love being surrounded by those asses.
Speaker 6: And then the snake. You didn't get to see any
Speaker 6: snakes we were out here, it was too early in
Speaker 6: the season. But we had a huge about four and
Speaker 6: a half five foot rat snake that came through and
Speaker 6: so we picked that, wrestled that thing up, picked it
Speaker 6: up and relocated it and so he saw again, a
Speaker 6: lot of people would have just taken an axe to
Speaker 6: the top of that thing's head.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we grabbed it and relocated it.
Speaker 4: And then you grabbed it. You grabbed it. You grabbed it,
Speaker 4: not me, you grabbed it. I filmed, but he was.
Speaker 2: There for again moral support.
Speaker 6: So it's been an awesome ranch exp experience for you
Speaker 6: in eight days out here.
Speaker 4: Dude.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that sounds amazing, man, it sounds like a good time. Well,
Speaker 1: no matter how much of good time that is. We're
Speaker 1: not here to talk about animal surgeries. You guys have
Speaker 1: been discussing some incredible information about the fabric of our reality,
Speaker 1: and that's what we're going to get into a little
Speaker 1: bit today, or as much as, like Dave said, as
Speaker 1: much as we can. There's some NDA's going on and
Speaker 1: a lot of top secret stuff that we can't get into.
Speaker 1: But I will let one of you guys give us
Speaker 1: an introduction to the basics of what we'll be discussing today.
Speaker 4: Sure do you want to take it away?
Speaker 5: And then sure, well, I mean for in terms of
Speaker 5: this is where it gets interesting. The we've had some
Speaker 5: late night discussions literally about this idea of what this
Speaker 5: reality may be comprised of with respects to the core
Speaker 5: substrate layer of this to the most we could say
Speaker 5: quantum or nano extent. And what we've been discussing is
Speaker 5: this idea, for example, just to start with that, if
Speaker 5: you have this pad right here, and this is representative
Speaker 5: of what's called the plank scale or planks reduced constant
Speaker 5: in this reality, meaning that there's something in which is
Speaker 5: called the ash decar bounce. This is in loop quantum gravity.
Speaker 5: There's also I mean this is also called zero point energy.
Speaker 5: You name it this idea of explosion, but a different
Speaker 5: type of explosion of energy than we're used to via implosion,
Speaker 5: as Dan Winter would call it as well, nondestructively. So
Speaker 5: this idea that plank here, this sort of underlying we
Speaker 5: could say, blueprint of energy that must be followed by
Speaker 5: and two geometrically, numerically you name it. Of this particular
Speaker 5: reality acts as a sort of threshold between at the
Speaker 5: zero point of everything between the ematerial which would be
Speaker 5: underneath this paper here in this example, or the ether
Speaker 5: if you will, and then the.
Speaker 4: Material up top.
Speaker 5: So this idea, for example, of if we were existing
Speaker 5: in this sort of called curvelinear reality, there would be
Speaker 5: some way to surmise a sort of what's called a
Speaker 5: geodesic type reality. And what I mean by that essentially
Speaker 5: is we could say concave, or we can even talk
Speaker 5: about this idea of light cones with respects to Minkowski
Speaker 5: flat space time and then building from there. But this idea,
Speaker 5: that essentially one an idea from the ether, comes from
Speaker 5: below this plank scale, and as you up top and
Speaker 5: the material reality begin to manifest that objective, whether it's
Speaker 5: I want to start a business, or I want to
Speaker 5: build something in the backyard, or whatever it is, that
Speaker 5: idea goes from the e material into the material in
Speaker 5: that particular sense, which would also speak to what Plato
Speaker 5: had discussed in the past about how there would be
Speaker 5: theoretically at least a perfect example or an infinite set
Speaker 5: of we could say, perfect potentials of what you want
Speaker 5: something to be. And then one of those potentials is
Speaker 5: sort of sort of like a branch of a tree
Speaker 5: removed from the trunk of the e and then brought
Speaker 5: into the material reality that then manifests is your idea,
Speaker 5: if you will. And now people talk about, for example,
Speaker 5: you know, there's a lot of talk in the New
Speaker 5: Age world about there being this ability to create or
Speaker 5: have something physical appear immediately just as you think of it.
Speaker 5: And that would basically be, for lack of a better description,
Speaker 5: a very sped up version of what I just described
Speaker 5: right there, because in today's reality we have to then,
Speaker 5: for example, it takes like my hand right over here,
Speaker 5: say I'm going to reach for Brandon's shoulder, it literally
Speaker 5: takes me time for my hand to reach over it.
Speaker 5: It is not instant, if that makes sense. So from
Speaker 5: this starting point to where Brandon's shoulder is, it takes
Speaker 5: a you know, one or two seconds for me to
Speaker 5: reach over in that sense, right even if it's half
Speaker 5: a second or one and a half seconds, it can
Speaker 5: be calculated in what we call time. The question is,
Speaker 5: could something, for example, skirt that or could something go
Speaker 5: around that in a certain way to have an immediate
Speaker 5: thought become material right away. And an example of that
Speaker 5: would be, for instance, could I bring either myself to
Speaker 5: Brandon's shoulder at light speed, bring my body from here
Speaker 5: close to him, or could he come to me at
Speaker 5: light speed? In that sense, And so that light speed
Speaker 5: seems to be comprising what's called in tensor metrics. In
Speaker 5: quantum field theory, physics, quantum electro dynamics, all of that.
Speaker 5: Basically that seems to enable what's called the weak equivalence
Speaker 5: principle with respects to light and photons, with respects to
Speaker 5: photons themselves in light, tend to find, with respects to
Speaker 5: what's called the Fairmont's principle, tends to find the fastest
Speaker 5: in its strongest form, tends to find the fastest route
Speaker 5: to get.
Speaker 4: To a piece of material over time.
Speaker 5: So we can say that as my hand reaches for
Speaker 5: Brandon's shoulder right now, that is occurring the photons in
Speaker 5: which are being emitted throughout this entire environment, will are
Speaker 5: finding the fastest way to essentially per give, we could say,
Speaker 5: not an illusion, but give a perception of what is
Speaker 5: happening right here as I reach for his shoulder. Now,
Speaker 5: the question that is, when photons are in their strongest form,
Speaker 5: they go in a very straight linear sense. The question
Speaker 5: is if whether through meditation or whether through some experiments
Speaker 5: in the laboratory, could the photons then be manipulated so
Speaker 5: that and this is what the weak equivalence principle is,
Speaker 5: so that they're not in their strong form, but in
Speaker 5: their weak form now in their weak form, it gets
Speaker 5: interesting because the photons don't necessarily move straight. They move
Speaker 5: in a curve linear sense. They start to so the
Speaker 5: end point is still the end point in a particular vicinity,
Speaker 5: so his shoulders still there.
Speaker 4: But instead of.
Speaker 5: My hand going straight and forward, what ends up happening
Speaker 5: is my hand starts to curve to get there. Now,
Speaker 5: when enough of that begins to build up, whether in
Speaker 5: a astral sense, in a meditative sense, or in the laboratory,
Speaker 5: what you end up having is exactly what I just
Speaker 5: described previously, where it doesn't take any time what's so ever,
Speaker 5: for my hand to reach Brandon's. It literally his shoulder
Speaker 5: either comes to me or my hand goes to him,
Speaker 5: if that makes sense.
Speaker 4: So that would be as.
Speaker 5: It's pretty it's pretty complex, but I'm trying to do
Speaker 5: the best that I can to well.
Speaker 1: Let me let me kind of uh intermediate and maybe
Speaker 1: dumb it down a little bit as much as I can.
Speaker 1: So what you're talking about basically is manipulation of a
Speaker 1: state of energy that we're not understanding yet that basically
Speaker 1: binds everything together that we do understand in the material world,
Speaker 1: and it's a way of being able to manipulate this
Speaker 1: for plenty of different reasons other than like you said,
Speaker 1: it could be traveling linear distance, it could be time travel,
Speaker 1: it could be anti gravity, it could be finding new
Speaker 1: forms of energy. It's basically everything that holds this reality together, right.
Speaker 5: Yes, bang on precisely, and if I may say, very simply,
Speaker 5: it comes down to finding that interacting, whether with what
Speaker 5: we want to call the vacuum or the ether or
Speaker 5: you know, the quantum vacuum, whatever we want to call it,
Speaker 5: tends to be much more favorable in terms of like
Speaker 5: this underlying energy tends to be far more favorable when
Speaker 5: space and time begin to curve rather than being straight.
Speaker 5: So this speaks again to the spirals we've seen across
Speaker 5: ancient history, you know, cave drawings, all of that. It
Speaker 5: also speaks to different angles of for example, concaveness. Now
Speaker 5: that is not I want to say very clearly, that
Speaker 5: is not necessarily to say the Earth is flat per se.
Speaker 5: There's a little bit more of you know, depth there
Speaker 5: in my opinion, but I think there's certainly some type
Speaker 5: of for lack of a better description, rendering going on,
Speaker 5: based on some of my own private research, some type
Speaker 5: of rendering in correspondence with a dare I say both
Speaker 5: that perhaps perhaps I say this carefully physical and also
Speaker 5: energetic type dome, if you will, And the question then becomes, well,
Speaker 5: this is where the game of perception tends to become
Speaker 5: very interesting with respects to you know, people send cameras
Speaker 5: up in the sky and they you know, some of
Speaker 5: the cameras they get flat images, other ones they get
Speaker 5: curved ones. It becomes very interesting because you start to realize,
Speaker 5: for example, that you cannot experience anything outside of the
Speaker 5: particular local environment in which you are physically in. Sure,
Speaker 5: you could say that I've seen something on the TV
Speaker 5: or I'm watching a football game right now, but you
Speaker 5: as an individual are not there yourself at that very moment.
Speaker 5: So this speaks to the idea that there's this underlying
Speaker 5: energy that may have something to do with photons, in
Speaker 5: which there is a tether, if you will, that we
Speaker 5: are all connected to. And I say this, I use
Speaker 5: these words carefully, but this idea that there's an energetic,
Speaker 5: energetic tether of sorts that we may be hooked up
Speaker 5: to some type of server, if you will.
Speaker 1: So, like you're saying, there's there's this base rendering of
Speaker 1: reality that has a basic understanding of what reality should
Speaker 1: look like, but depending on our observations and interactions, it
Speaker 1: could it could change, right.
Speaker 5: And for lack of a better description, it reaches in
Speaker 5: via quantum processes for in that in that sense, which
Speaker 5: would speak to fractality and what have you.
Speaker 1: But yes, yeah, man, that is incredible Brandon thoughts on
Speaker 1: all this.
Speaker 4: Sorry, if I may say one last thing.
Speaker 5: These photons, like a surfer riding a wave, they travel
Speaker 5: across what are called these null geodesics. So it gets
Speaker 5: very interesting when you realize that the geodesic or the
Speaker 5: geometry of an area that you're trying to understand by
Speaker 5: definition and dictates the parameters and what's called the boundary
Speaker 5: conditions and all of the different what are called affine
Speaker 5: principles that the energy could then do if you start
Speaker 5: to manipulate it. So what I mean, for example, is
Speaker 5: that if you have say, for example, let's see here,
Speaker 5: say we have a cone or like, this is a
Speaker 5: reality that we are viewing in a ninety degree right
Speaker 5: angle sense where this is here, what ends up happening
Speaker 5: is if you want to start to perturb or manipulate
Speaker 5: via gravitational waves.
Speaker 4: Let's say, the environment around you.
Speaker 5: There's always a proportionality constant that is underneath. It's sort
Speaker 5: of like this, which gives rise to information theory. There's
Speaker 5: always either a one in a zero that is either
Speaker 5: creating or destroying, which could then be illustrated in a
Speaker 5: sinusoidal type wave. So what ends up happening is if
Speaker 5: you want to expand this reality, say you want to
Speaker 5: mirror it, or do what I've put over here for
Speaker 5: what I've drawn below, what ends up happening is that
Speaker 5: the dictation of the original coordinates and the original rather
Speaker 5: metric from over here dictates by definition what would be
Speaker 5: called a third time derivative, whether it's through velocity, acceleration,
Speaker 5: you name it, and that creates this here. But there's
Speaker 5: always a intersection point, sort of like the Penrose stairs
Speaker 5: so to speak, or like a Mobias strip ebbing and flowing.
Speaker 5: If you add a third time derivative or a fourth
Speaker 5: spatial dimension to the Mobias strip, the Mobia strip becomes
Speaker 5: very feasible, which then gives credence to what's called the
Speaker 5: hop bounce. And so what you then have is basically
Speaker 5: this reality that we started in here is directly and
Speaker 5: strictly proportional to what occurs here, because this is we
Speaker 5: could say, I say this carefully, a mirror reflection or
Speaker 5: perturbation that has to follow the boundary conditions of this
Speaker 5: one here, so it would all be proportional basically, And
Speaker 5: this is what arguably are intent to maybe formulating.
Speaker 1: Yes, there's so many directions that we could possibly go
Speaker 1: before I do brandon anything to add.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I mean, so this is what it's been for
Speaker 6: eight days, and it's been outstanding. This plus just all
Speaker 6: sorts of amazing stuff and there's all sorts of things
Speaker 6: coming out soon for y'all to look forward to with
Speaker 6: him beeting here as well. And yeah, so this idea
Speaker 6: is one that I'd personally been vacillating on before he
Speaker 6: had even gotten here, and before we you never know
Speaker 6: what this like, what are we going to talk about
Speaker 6: anti gravity?
Speaker 4: You know whatever?
Speaker 6: But it's really been this topic and really sort of
Speaker 6: this assimilation of the tribes that we're in now because
Speaker 6: of the awareness of consciousness, this back to source, this
Speaker 6: greater understanding, this critical mass is it seems at play
Speaker 6: here in the models that we've been messing with, because
Speaker 6: this idea goes is that yes, this is a simulation
Speaker 6: of sorts my best interpretation, and I'm only just going
Speaker 6: to tell you what I feel about. This is what
Speaker 6: I've been looking at for a year and all that shit.
Speaker 6: It's just like it is a simulation, but it's your
Speaker 6: choice to be here. You are fractled into a bunch
Speaker 6: of little pieces. This is a ride for you to
Speaker 6: get to a critical mass, to figure out that it's
Speaker 6: a ride, and to see that it's just a game,
Speaker 6: and to also realize that you're in a dome. And
Speaker 6: once you realize that, it breaks open and then the
Speaker 6: full technique, color of this actual of the actual reality,
Speaker 6: and awareness and understanding and everything comes into this. Now
Speaker 6: this ties into the arconsole trap as far as not
Speaker 6: going towards the light when you die. This also comes
Speaker 6: to just even having conversations like this are the fuel
Speaker 6: for this awareness.
Speaker 2: So that's key to this.
Speaker 6: If anyone's curious about how to be actionable in this,
Speaker 6: have conversations like this, think about this stuff, expand your
Speaker 6: awareness of what's possible. And David I definitely and with
Speaker 6: Chris as well, are absolutely going to do that here today.
Speaker 6: So one of the big things that's with this was
Speaker 6: this idea for me with the Vitruvian man. I started
Speaker 6: looking at that thing and thinking about it, and I
Speaker 6: was thinking about like the simulation, and I'm always you know,
Speaker 6: you know how we do, man, It's always up there
Speaker 6: and it's always running around and we're always enjoying it.
Speaker 6: And it got to a point where I was sitting
Speaker 6: there thinking about the mechanisms of the simulation. And when
Speaker 6: you know, board or bone rather Nick Bostrom talks about
Speaker 6: this stuff, they always bring up the fact that it
Speaker 6: would take a planet sized computer to run what we
Speaker 6: think a simulation would fool us in, right, But again
Speaker 6: this is based on our perspective. I've reminded back to
Speaker 6: like Nuts and boltscraft whenever they're talking about these ninety
Speaker 6: degree right hand turns that UFOs take and they're like, well,
Speaker 6: we couldn't do that, and it's like, well okay, And
Speaker 6: then they're like, well, why would they come.
Speaker 2: Here from a far off place?
Speaker 6: Like that would take too much time, it'd be too hard,
Speaker 6: And the answer is, obviously it's not hard for them.
Speaker 6: Like step out of your own idea of what's real
Speaker 6: and possible and maybe there are there answers there that
Speaker 6: would you know, shine some light onto the mechanisms here.
Speaker 4: So there's a difference between technology and science, yeah, man, and.
Speaker 2: Understanding and awareness and danger and threat.
Speaker 6: They were like all these like sub understandings with things
Speaker 6: that are just fascinating and they're in the semantics, which
Speaker 6: again are so important to open up. So again back
Speaker 6: to this idea of the simulation. I was sitting here thinking, well,
Speaker 6: perhaps like if you wanted to render an entire environment,
Speaker 6: and from our perspective, yes, it would look that way.
Speaker 6: But what if it wasn't necessary. What if all you
Speaker 6: needed to do Just like in Rick and Morty when
Speaker 6: he plays a game Roy, remember that he puts on
Speaker 6: the helmet. He thinks he's this dude for like forty
Speaker 6: years and gets cancer and goes back to the carpet store.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and he like wakes up, He's like, where's my wife,
Speaker 2: where's my family?
Speaker 6: Because psychedelic experiences and your death experiences sometimes people have this.
Speaker 6: So what I was thinking about with this is all
Speaker 6: you really need to do is create some sort of mechanism, algorithm,
Speaker 6: whatever framework, quantum foam, anything like that to apprehend one
Speaker 6: hundred percent of the perspective of the occupant.
Speaker 2: That's all you need to do.
Speaker 6: And then I was thinking to that Vitruvian man thing,
Speaker 6: and this kind of terrifies me. To be honest, if
Speaker 6: I'm being super honest with a little claustrophobic, is that
Speaker 6: maybe your reality ends right at the tips of your fingers,
Speaker 6: as far as you can spread in any direction, and
Speaker 6: that that's where your reality ends. Because then if this
Speaker 6: is just an apprehension of perception, you could stand at
Speaker 6: the edge of what you're thinking is the Grand Canyon
Speaker 6: and be so immersed in the fact that you perceive vastness.
Speaker 2: It doesn't need to be fast, you just perceive it
Speaker 2: that way.
Speaker 5: It gives credence to what's something called Bomian decoherence. So basically,
Speaker 5: this idea that you are rendering with your environment. But
Speaker 5: when I say the word rendering, great care pay But
Speaker 5: this idea that there's an organic.
Speaker 4: Sort of ebb and flow with your local environment.
Speaker 5: You begin to walk into a particular area or something
Speaker 5: like that, and what ends up happening is that environment
Speaker 5: makes subtle adjustments because it must correspond to what you
Speaker 5: intend and want. Although if you are consciously not aware
Speaker 5: that that is the case, it becomes quite easy to
Speaker 5: realize that to.
Speaker 4: Then start throwing around the word trap and what have you. Right, So,
Speaker 4: and that's.
Speaker 6: Where like I wanted to really step into thank you
Speaker 6: for saying that. I wanted to really step into it
Speaker 6: and say that I don't feel that this is a trap, right,
Speaker 6: It's a an experience, it's a ride, and that's that's
Speaker 6: really how I'll put this. And so I jokingly say
Speaker 6: the claustrophobic thing, but what I mean to say is
Speaker 6: that it's so good that it can apprehend yourself in
Speaker 6: every direction. Right, and then we get back to those
Speaker 6: you know, brains and a bad idea, all of those
Speaker 6: kind of things. But what I will say to this
Speaker 6: is then you would say that even the apprehension of
Speaker 6: your perspective, and then we start talking about the simulation,
Speaker 6: and then we start talking about this critical mass, and
Speaker 6: then you apply this to spiritual things because then you know,
Speaker 6: we have many lenses, and thank god we do the
Speaker 6: shows we do to where it's not.
Speaker 2: Just this is what aliens are.
Speaker 6: Like, we really dive into many, many things and look
Speaker 6: at this with many lenses. And so through those lenses
Speaker 6: we're able to see the teachings of Dolores Canon talking
Speaker 6: about a split perhaps, and in the law of one
Speaker 6: talking about this split perhaps, and then perhaps there's this
Speaker 6: critical mass of consciousness that's here that would then render
Speaker 6: the simulation.
Speaker 4: That's what I was just going to bring up.
Speaker 1: Is this this critical mass? Is this unseen force that's
Speaker 1: that holds everything together? Is this what we could consider
Speaker 1: pure consciousness?
Speaker 5: In my opinion, there's a fantastic paper written about twenty
Speaker 5: years ago approximately by doctor Robert Baker Bob Baker, and
Speaker 5: the paper is called Our Mind looks at Us and
Speaker 5: I find it very interesting because it speaks to this
Speaker 5: idea of what's called brain theory, but not b r
Speaker 5: AI N b r A N E. This idea that,
Speaker 5: for example, if I may draw it out very quickly,
Speaker 5: it's this idea of doing basically to Einstein what Einstein
Speaker 5: did to Newton, which is what I meant earlier about
Speaker 5: the difference between science and technology. It's not perhaps that
Speaker 5: these beings, some of them, sure, but are far more
Speaker 5: ahead of us technologically.
Speaker 4: That's a different thing.
Speaker 5: The question is is there more more fundamental understanding to
Speaker 5: the universe that we, at least publicly have not yet discerned,
Speaker 5: understood or tap et cetera, which would give credence to
Speaker 5: this idea that for a moment, we may be existing.
Speaker 5: If I may on, for example, some type of I
Speaker 5: will draw this out here like this, some type of
Speaker 5: reality where this would be there would be an unlimited
Speaker 5: amount of levels, if you want to call it, and
Speaker 5: we would be existing thing on one of them, which
Speaker 5: would give credence to this idea of again the multiverse,
Speaker 5: parallel realities. It would open up all of that. I
Speaker 5: find it very interesting that when you look, for example,
Speaker 5: at the way in which if we were to say
Speaker 5: we are existing within let's just say reality number one
Speaker 5: at the very top here, by living in the present,
Speaker 5: you are generating both the future and the past. And
Speaker 5: so what's happening here is say this is the future
Speaker 5: and that's the past. By living in the moment, you
Speaker 5: are dictating a full on again say this carefully rendering
Speaker 5: of your experience that is constant. That is, for example,
Speaker 5: that would give credence to what we discuss about, like
Speaker 5: with the Mandela effect. Let's say, now, for example, don't
Speaker 5: get me wrong, I'm certain that there are I'm fairly
Speaker 5: certain there are external elements at play there, but external
Speaker 5: elements that harness our internal ones. We just don't realize
Speaker 5: that we're internally utilizing such so therefore that would give
Speaker 5: credence to the rise, like for example, the Mandela effect
Speaker 5: as a mass conscient and not necessarily everybody, but you
Speaker 5: know a number of people and even individuals that are
Speaker 5: strong enough to be aware of this and do this
Speaker 5: on their own as I'm sure, I'm sure sure there
Speaker 5: are packets or patches of people around the planet that
Speaker 5: have done so. They realize this particular case, that there
Speaker 5: are multiple or an infinite amount of realities if we
Speaker 5: want to call it. But by living in the present,
Speaker 5: you generate both the future and the past, and then
Speaker 5: what comes from there essentially is that both the past
Speaker 5: is then re rendered relative to your present time, and
Speaker 5: so is the future. If you catch my drift, and
Speaker 5: now you can say, well, would this be akin to say,
Speaker 5: you know, frames on a movie, film film or frame
Speaker 5: dragging or whatever you want to call it, And I
Speaker 5: would say, yeah.
Speaker 2: Interesting, So go ahead burn no, no, please, please, no.
Speaker 1: I was just gonna get your thoughts on the possibilities
Speaker 1: that this consciousness energy, whatever this is that we're dealing with,
Speaker 1: this unseen force, can manifest itself physically, say as an entity,
Speaker 1: say as a cryptid creature, as a bigfoot. Can this
Speaker 1: pure consciousness manifest into our reality as a physicality.
Speaker 5: If I well, if we go back very quickly, first off,
Speaker 5: I would say yes, and I'll explain why I'm making
Speaker 5: this very brief here so as to not get all
Speaker 5: you know, scientific and all that. But people talk about
Speaker 5: quite often being able to see things in the dark
Speaker 5: much better with the corner of their eyes rather than
Speaker 5: looking at directly at it. Many people have claimed they've
Speaker 5: seen spirits with the corner of their eyes, and bigfoot
Speaker 5: and what have you. And I think that what we're
Speaker 5: seeing in those particular regards. That's not to say people
Speaker 5: haven't seen them directly straight up. But it's interesting to
Speaker 5: note that photons, as we know it publicly, are the
Speaker 5: only particles in which we can observe one hundred percent
Speaker 5: of the spectrum of And it's almost as if there's
Speaker 5: this idea of again some type of we could say,
Speaker 5: learning mechanism for us to then break out of in
Speaker 5: that sense with regards to the weak feel equivalents principle,
Speaker 5: as we discussed earlier, where photons when they start to
Speaker 5: bend you start to see things outside of this particular spectrum. Now,
Speaker 5: it's interesting that if you think with the corner of
Speaker 5: your eye and you start to see, sorry, you start
Speaker 5: to see things with the corner of your eye, and
Speaker 5: you start to think, well, that's just nonsense, or what
Speaker 5: have you. It's very possible that what is being observed
Speaker 5: there is something outside or at the very limits of
Speaker 5: the boundaries of the confinement of the predesignated energetic paradigm.
Speaker 5: We may be within and I say that because that
Speaker 5: gives direct credence to what's called angular momentum in quantum
Speaker 5: field theory, which speaks directly to basically, vortex is instead
Speaker 5: of straight lines. So this idea that a fractal like
Speaker 5: vortex may have. We may be within one layer, but
Speaker 5: there are just like an onion, there are many internal
Speaker 5: layers and many external layers as well. So that may
Speaker 5: be it's very similar to doing scientifically to Einstein's general
Speaker 5: relativity what Einstein did to Newton, in the sense of basically,
Speaker 5: I mean, arguably people said that it was more like
Speaker 5: Einstein did it was more like Maxwell completed it.
Speaker 4: But any that's a different debate.
Speaker 5: But the idea that it's not that there's missing, that
Speaker 5: there's technology we don't understand, but rather fundamental science that
Speaker 5: is missing that, once implemented into general relativity, completes the
Speaker 5: whole entire aspect of a.
Speaker 4: Unified field theory or understanding everything.
Speaker 5: So there's been this strong proposal that there is perhaps
Speaker 5: a missing key that general relativity special relativity, it would
Speaker 5: be let's put that aside for a moment. But general
Speaker 5: relativity is not wrong, it's just that there would be
Speaker 5: something missing in it. Special relativity was an attempt to
Speaker 5: try and formulate an inertial frame or an inertial viewpoint
Speaker 5: for every individual, which is not the case, which is
Speaker 5: then what gave.
Speaker 4: Rise to what's called stochastic electrodynamics.
Speaker 5: Because there is no one pillar in which one everyone goes, oh,
Speaker 5: I agree with you on that. In terms of viewing something,
Speaker 5: you are the pillar by definition, So special relativity would
Speaker 5: be thrown out the window, and this new variable that
Speaker 5: would then complete general relativity, would give credence to everything
Speaker 5: that we'd be discussing here.
Speaker 1: Man, it seems like this universal consciousness is actually communicating
Speaker 1: with folks like yourself, Dave, Folks like yourself, Brandon, Folks
Speaker 1: like myself, people who are breaking these codes, cracking things
Speaker 1: like anti gravity. It's like this consciousness wants us to
Speaker 1: have a better understanding of what's going on so that
Speaker 1: we can free ourselves out of a certain construct are
Speaker 1: constructed aspect of this matrix.
Speaker 6: Right, I'd say, so I think of it like an
Speaker 6: alarm clock. Like think of the awakening as like an
Speaker 6: alarm clock. Let's say that you did choose to be here,
Speaker 6: and then it's not a trap because I choose a
Speaker 6: bounce optimness in that way, and so therefore that's what
Speaker 6: it is for me. And let's say that this is
Speaker 6: an experience where you fractal lies. Now, it doesn't also
Speaker 6: mean that there aren't something referred to as n PC's
Speaker 6: or non playable characters, because that would be necessary for
Speaker 6: an experience like let's say it's still maybe all you
Speaker 6: or maybe your everything anyway, but it's let's separate it
Speaker 6: out just for the for the thought of it, to
Speaker 6: keep it kind of straight. And let's say that it's
Speaker 6: part of the game. Let's say that you buy a
Speaker 6: video game and some other dimension and that this is it,
Speaker 6: or you take a bong rip and this is it,
Speaker 6: and basically you go into this world where there's fractualized
Speaker 6: versions of you, and perhaps you split yourself into I
Speaker 6: don't know, one hundred and forty four thousand different versions
Speaker 6: of you, and anything else out here is just in
Speaker 6: PCs or just employees of the situation.
Speaker 2: They're parts of the game.
Speaker 6: They're here to lead you on side quests and to
Speaker 6: get you caught up, but also to get you freed.
Speaker 6: And then maybe this one hundred and forty four thousand things,
Speaker 6: whatever that is, if that's even a thing, then that's us,
Speaker 6: whatever us is assimilating back into the unity and at
Speaker 6: least making contact and speaking with each other.
Speaker 2: Like maybe that's it.
Speaker 6: It's just sort of a tag, you're it, and we
Speaker 6: all make sort of this cognitive contact with one another.
Speaker 6: Now the other thing too, this is whenever you start
Speaker 6: to think about this in the sense of it being
Speaker 6: sort of this isolated environment again, I think of perhaps
Speaker 6: an awakening would be just that. I mean, maybe it's
Speaker 6: phrase as such, the game is over, or you've been
Speaker 6: asleep for too long, or the bong hits wearing off,
Speaker 6: or your alarm clock's going off in the other dimension,
Speaker 6: whatever you want to say. Fractalized versions of you now
Speaker 6: are being incentivized to speed up the game, to go
Speaker 6: ahead and reassemble if you haven't figured it out by now.
Speaker 6: It's sort of like an escape room if anybody's ever
Speaker 6: done one of those.
Speaker 2: I really see it as like play, like really playful.
Speaker 6: Same thing as from a couple of reports of people
Speaker 6: in the Ease that come back and they say, holy shit, dude,
Speaker 6: it's so simple.
Speaker 2: It's so easy.
Speaker 6: It's just a fucking game. Like I get it, I
Speaker 6: see it all. It's all for show, and like these
Speaker 6: awarenesses where they get they just see it. They're just like,
Speaker 6: oh my god, people are taking this seriously, are you
Speaker 6: kidding me? It's this interesting thing. And then especially folks
Speaker 6: who have actually died. There are people that I've talked
Speaker 6: to that have sat with their family members that were
Speaker 6: passing over and they said that all of a sudden,
Speaker 6: their vision changed, and they said that they looked around
Speaker 6: with this surprised look on their face and they just
Speaker 6: start laughing. And this is like second as they're taking
Speaker 6: their last breath, this is what they're seeing, and they
Speaker 6: just start laughing.
Speaker 2: They go, oh my god, it's so simple. It's so simple.
Speaker 2: There are multiple accounts.
Speaker 6: Where people have referred to this at their last moments,
Speaker 6: like they can see something.
Speaker 2: Now, if you don't mind, can you allow me to
Speaker 2: share this? You just got quickure on Okay.
Speaker 6: So one of the things that we were talking about
Speaker 6: here was this idea of a fractalized or what the
Speaker 6: environment may look like now maybe And I've worked a
Speaker 6: lot of simulation arguments and talks, and we went through
Speaker 6: a lot of sci fi things, which I'll show you
Speaker 6: the notepad of here.
Speaker 2: It's incredible.
Speaker 6: But one of the things I kind of wanted to
Speaker 6: point out here was this idea that the ancients knew
Speaker 6: for a long time. One of the models that we
Speaker 6: came to is actually this exact Norse model. It's basically
Speaker 6: that we're on a table. There's a box with wires
Speaker 6: cut into it with a all of our fractalized versions
Speaker 6: basically connected with a chord.
Speaker 2: Now, what do you hear in mediumship? This cord? This string?
Speaker 6: You hear about this golden thread or this cable that's
Speaker 6: connecting us to something. Perhaps it's like a main frame
Speaker 6: of sorts. Again, you don't need to get cold with
Speaker 6: the mechanics of it. It could be an organic simulation again,
Speaker 6: sort of a thing, don't limit it by what humans
Speaker 6: tell you as possible. Okay, so then you fixture this
Speaker 6: thing on like a table, and that maybe your physical
Speaker 6: body is laying out here somewhere. Maybe the Egyptians had
Speaker 6: it more right, Maybe this is your physic body in
Speaker 6: another dimension.
Speaker 5: That tree, by the way underneath in the Norse one
Speaker 5: there also describes the the Lorenz vector gage.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so there's a lot of math in this as well.
Speaker 6: We figured out a lot of like diagrams for electric
Speaker 6: originary you're asimuth perspective.
Speaker 4: You have a lot of these different yeah, yeah.
Speaker 2: Crazy awesome shit.
Speaker 6: And then you also have again these ideals again the
Speaker 6: or bores, which we see quite a bit, this Hindu
Speaker 6: representation of an on.
Speaker 2: The back and these stacked things.
Speaker 6: And if you, let's say you were an ancient person,
Speaker 6: you were taken out in a ufo perhaps, and it's
Speaker 6: one of these entities that maybe on the outside of
Speaker 6: this thing that can come in here rab a little
Speaker 6: piece of your consciousness and zoom you back out, because
Speaker 6: that's part of the game. Maybe part of the game
Speaker 6: is to be able to zoom you out here, to
Speaker 6: give you a perspective of it and then drop you
Speaker 6: back off. And then this seemed to happen to the
Speaker 6: Inca of the Navajo, the Hebrew Nasa.
Speaker 2: I love the oh. I just saw that, Okay, I
Speaker 2: just saw that.
Speaker 4: It's wonderful.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 6: And then the Mayaan, the Hindu Norse again, and then
Speaker 6: the Egyptian and it's just really interesting that they weren't
Speaker 6: connected at all.
Speaker 2: But you don't have to be.
Speaker 6: You're thinking the hundredth monkey effect now that if you
Speaker 6: were shown something at a deep, deep, deep level, and
Speaker 6: the Shamans are shown things.
Speaker 5: Well, then that's what is the What is the hundredth
Speaker 5: monkey effect that we currently don't right.
Speaker 6: I mean, maybe it's our higher selves again getting these
Speaker 6: downloads or codes from again the game, which again is
Speaker 6: just your higher selves. Like all of these things tie
Speaker 6: in now to this idea of higher selves, spirituality, all
Speaker 6: of it ties in together.
Speaker 1: That's why I have to lean towards that this is
Speaker 1: for us, and it's not some arconic overlay where there
Speaker 1: are some kind of demonic entities siphoning our energy like
Speaker 1: batteries and bring these little pods with goo that have
Speaker 1: these tubes stuck into our brain projecting this reality. I'd
Speaker 1: like to think that maybe this is for us, that
Speaker 1: either we created it for ourselves, or it's an experience
Speaker 1: that is built into our reality to have our spiritual
Speaker 1: advancement and evolution, or maybe we throw some of these,
Speaker 1: you know, it's an experience for us, and we throw
Speaker 1: ourselves maybe mystical, paranormal or spiritual experiences like pressing a
Speaker 1: cheat code in a video game to help us progress
Speaker 1: a little bit faster. I don't know what do you
Speaker 1: guys think.
Speaker 5: I think it's it's equivalent with respects to like to
Speaker 5: your point, like a one in zero scenario, I think
Speaker 5: you have, for example, the.
Speaker 4: Potential for that to be the case.
Speaker 5: You also, and this speaks to existing within the present
Speaker 5: time and living in the present instead of for example,
Speaker 5: it's much easier said than done, but harping on something
Speaker 5: that would be, you know, something in the past which
Speaker 5: would be giving rise or manifestation to depression, and then
Speaker 5: of course thinking about something in the future that has
Speaker 5: not yet happened or may not happen at all, gives
Speaker 5: credence to the concept of you know, anxiety and what
Speaker 5: have you with respects to anticipation, and so by living
Speaker 5: in the present, you then begin to dictate and realize
Speaker 5: more of what perhaps may be around you, and those
Speaker 5: terms begin to then we could say, subside to more
Speaker 5: of a realization that is indescribable in a verbal sense.
Speaker 5: And I think that that speaks to again this idea
Speaker 5: of are there. In my view, there are negative elements
Speaker 5: that we're here, still here and all that, sure, But
Speaker 5: I think that that's just looking at one half of
Speaker 5: the glass. I think you also have to look, for example,
Speaker 5: at the other half as well, which speaks to the
Speaker 5: the more people realize by definition that there's a there's
Speaker 5: a very strong positive element to all of this, as
Speaker 5: we've been discussing, just by realizing and having those conversations,
Speaker 5: by definition, weaken the energies, whether material or immaterial, of
Speaker 5: of the more negative, potentially negative aspect of things. The
Speaker 5: same way that for example, one can have a can
Speaker 5: either you know, have an animal and take care of
Speaker 5: it beautifully, or one can.
Speaker 4: Have an animal and then end up eating it.
Speaker 5: It's truly it's a dual use type of scenario, right,
Speaker 5: So that that's just my take.
Speaker 4: That's that, But you know, I could be wrong myself.
Speaker 6: Third scenario because there's always more potentiality should take care
Speaker 6: of that animal like crazy, and you love it like
Speaker 6: crazy and then.
Speaker 4: You eat it and then you're right. Yeah, I like the.
Speaker 6: Kobe beef or Wagoo, they like masageum and everything like that.
Speaker 2: They live the best lives. They die like super peaceful. Yes, yeah,
Speaker 2: they get them high or something like that before.
Speaker 6: So I was gonna say too to this is there's
Speaker 6: a part of this like consciousness thing. And one of
Speaker 6: the conversations we've been having about is about sort of
Speaker 6: this split or this pull shift or this separation. You know,
Speaker 6: it's referred to in the Bible, probably for that reading
Speaker 6: level it as revelation right at the apocalypse, where there's
Speaker 6: this great like you'll.
Speaker 2: Go here because you're good, and you'll go here because.
Speaker 6: You're by it and that's why Jesus say it. So
Speaker 6: that's sort of that mentality. But one way that I've
Speaker 6: been interpreting that lately more toward the again the Dolores
Speaker 6: canon idea of people familiar with this three D five
Speaker 6: D split. There's so many analogies to this. It's so fractal,
Speaker 6: it's everywhere. So one of the things I've been thinking of,
Speaker 6: because Dave's drawn pictures I'm gonna draw to. Okay, is
Speaker 6: sort of this idea of this plane. Now, this is
Speaker 6: what the Law of One apparently talks about as well.
Speaker 6: I was talking about this the other night on a
Speaker 6: show and Pat Mahn said, that's what this is.
Speaker 2: So I need to read that book.
Speaker 6: So if you think of like linear energies, okay, like
Speaker 6: we've been sort of in this other area over here
Speaker 6: that we've filled to shit, and then we've gotten on
Speaker 6: this plane of opportunity and this is what we call
Speaker 6: a choice point. You are here kind of a thing here.
Speaker 6: Now we've been moving in sort of this linear faction.
Speaker 6: Now the wake up has occurred, and that's what this
Speaker 6: you are here is.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 6: Perhaps what all of this is then, is that those
Speaker 6: that are choosing to do so are going to take
Speaker 6: the positive route up to expand consciousness, to fill us
Speaker 6: to the most that we can in this new void perspective.
Speaker 6: In the same sense, those with fear, those who are
Speaker 6: all about the technocratic society, those who are very willing
Speaker 6: to give over their free choice here are going to
Speaker 6: be along for the ride to go down to expand
Speaker 6: the most possible energies. As far as the negative poll goes,
Speaker 6: Now it's just about what you're attracted to in this life.
Speaker 6: All of us sitting here just happen to be attracted
Speaker 6: to not you know, stabbing puppies in the face. So
Speaker 6: because of that, we're I believe, on this direction here. Now,
Speaker 6: this split is probably going to be more of a
Speaker 6: physical one where there's literally going to be I don't
Speaker 6: know what this proceives. We've talked about this quite a bit,
Speaker 6: that this is basically where the simulation kicks into chapter
Speaker 6: two or the next game, to where these people are
Speaker 6: really going to experience the shit out of what they
Speaker 6: chose to experience at this choice point. We find ourselves
Speaker 6: in same to this though, if you've been finding yourself
Speaker 6: on an avenue of service, authenticity, elation, you've been just
Speaker 6: leveling up like crazy, well then.
Speaker 2: Cam Ow, we are spiraling up that mountain together.
Speaker 6: Also, if you still find yourself in fear actually, if
Speaker 6: you're listening to this or not on that at all.
Speaker 6: So yeah, how you know is if you're listening to this.
Speaker 6: So it's an interesting thing to sort of visualize these
Speaker 6: things this way to expand and what happens when that
Speaker 6: In that visualization, you can sort of look at that
Speaker 6: as what a tower of Babel, Right, this is the
Speaker 6: idea of reaching up and expanding out to get to
Speaker 6: the heavens to break out. Now again, I'm not sure
Speaker 6: if this is sort of a physical breakout, you know,
Speaker 6: but I do see you know, Operation Height, fish Bowl
Speaker 6: and stuff where they were launching nukes at something and
Speaker 6: that didn't seem to do it.
Speaker 2: So maybe it's love or something else.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it makes me think of how many ways there
Speaker 1: are to manipulate and manifest things into our reality. Look
Speaker 1: at things like magic and rituals and o'c caull practices.
Speaker 1: There are so many different ways that they're singing, dancing,
Speaker 1: chance spells, sigils, all these different ways of manipulating energy
Speaker 1: to affect a physical, possible physical outcome into our reality.
Speaker 1: There would be probably infinite ways of achieving any type
Speaker 1: of I guess you could say goal or physical physical
Speaker 1: goal for this reality.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 5: If I could say to that point, I think there's
Speaker 5: there would be a finite amount within this reality. But
Speaker 5: then as there would be another layer outside of this one,
Speaker 5: in a hypothetical or speculative sense, you'd have an expansion
Speaker 5: from this one in terms of say, for example, we
Speaker 5: have x amount of periodic you know, elements on the
Speaker 5: periodic table.
Speaker 4: In this reality.
Speaker 5: There may be another layer, if you will, but that
Speaker 5: is not only comprised of energies that would be assembled
Speaker 5: from the elements we do know, but also have elements
Speaker 5: that we don't know as well. So I think there
Speaker 5: would be an infinite amount of, say on a grand scale,
Speaker 5: outside of this reality. The experience is infinite and limitless,
Speaker 5: which speaks to philosophically the joy being in the journey.
Speaker 5: And I think that in this reality, because of the
Speaker 5: the we could say densification of matter to a particular regard,
Speaker 5: there are certainly many ways. There's not just one way,
Speaker 5: but there are many ways to tap this ability to
Speaker 5: manipulate say this particular reality or the metric of this
Speaker 5: reality and all of that. It is of my very
Speaker 5: humble opinion that it is there would just like with
Speaker 5: everything in terms of circulation, in this reality, there are
Speaker 5: a finite set of possibilities that could occur. But then
Speaker 5: there is also outside of this reality, by definition of
Speaker 5: going through the layers, an infinite set that could occur.
Speaker 5: So you can take some of that that for lack
Speaker 5: of a better definition, wildcard variable that is not pre
Speaker 5: designated to be puted in this reality to then enter
Speaker 5: this reality in a very we could say non expected
Speaker 5: form in the sense of say, superpositioning and superdeterminism and
Speaker 5: all of this in the sense that there are many
Speaker 5: different routes. Certain in terms of internal paths of choice
Speaker 5: I believe are infinite. In terms of material, I think
Speaker 5: the material is a reminiscent, is a residue of the
Speaker 5: internal infinite state that we then give rise to via
Speaker 5: our intent, and that material external we could say propagation
Speaker 5: of particles and energies is finite relative to our belief system,
Speaker 5: if that makes sense. And so I think what we
Speaker 5: look at or when we see that there is we're
Speaker 5: trying to basically understand. Let me give you a practical
Speaker 5: example when we talk about let's think of, say, for example,
Speaker 5: you know, things like missiles and bombs and what have you.
Speaker 4: What we're seeing there is, in my.
Speaker 5: Opinion, an example of what it's like. I said this
Speaker 5: brand in the other night. When particles are fighting with
Speaker 5: each other, it creates a very destructive explosion because there's
Speaker 5: no space for the understanding of the particles to Then
Speaker 5: we could say phase lock within or you know, cohesively
Speaker 5: integrate themselves into. So what we know as an explosion occurs.
Speaker 5: If there was a proper we could say, I don't
Speaker 5: want to use the word proper. If there was a
Speaker 5: grander insight into doing something more benevolent than making weapons,
Speaker 5: you would get the particles to make love instead of fight,
Speaker 5: like literally by definition, and this would be this would
Speaker 5: be what in optics, for example, with respects to say
Speaker 5: unstable resonators, Faraday rotators, different types of what would be
Speaker 5: called vector summation thresholds or vector thresholds. This would be
Speaker 5: called phase locking in particle physics. Whether it's within chemistry
Speaker 5: or optics or you know, you name it, it would
Speaker 5: be the same across the board. So in other words,
Speaker 5: the idea would be that we're trying to get without
Speaker 5: realizing it, we're trying to get the part particles and
Speaker 5: energies all around us to make love. But the everyday, say,
Speaker 5: distractions cause our intent to then manifest more of that
Speaker 5: class half empty type perspective, which then causes more and
Speaker 5: more derivation on a grander scale to and dissemination of
Speaker 5: infighting of particles.
Speaker 4: And we can argue that we ourselves are a particle and.
Speaker 5: So that that then gives rise to things, for example,
Speaker 5: like the Boltzmann brain and all that kind of stuff.
Speaker 4: And so, yeah.
Speaker 1: That's so interesting. And I want to go back to
Speaker 1: what Brandon was saying about how folks are either going
Speaker 1: through this ascension process, are they're getting sucked even deeper
Speaker 1: into the material realms and the nonsense that's going on. Well, eventually,
Speaker 1: won't both of extreme both of the both of those
Speaker 1: extremes be true. Won't there be people sucked into AI
Speaker 1: ready player one land and in this the matrix within
Speaker 1: the matrix, and then they'll have people folks like us
Speaker 1: homesteading and having our own you know, growing our own food,
Speaker 1: helping people and their lives and doing the things that
Speaker 1: we do. Couldn't both be true at the same time. Eventually?
Speaker 4: Yes, if I could say very quickly, yes, go ahead.
Speaker 5: I want it similar to the anc or the sort
Speaker 5: of the the why, if you want to call it,
Speaker 5: the there's going to be, in my opinion, there's going
Speaker 5: to be a split. A reality in my opinion, is
Speaker 5: approaching a threshold of a superposition where you're going to
Speaker 5: have x amount of individuals that, depending on their uh,
Speaker 5: you know many different variables of their life, but whether
Speaker 5: they have internally, in my view, because it's by definition
Speaker 5: in the science that a lot of it has largely
Speaker 5: been you know, locked up at least in North America
Speaker 5: and the West, what we're going to see is a
Speaker 5: split where, for example, there will be suddenly a new
Speaker 5: form of energy and realization of both literal, physical and
Speaker 5: non material concepts over the next tops tops tops fifteen years.
Speaker 4: In my opinion.
Speaker 5: And then what you'll have from from there is the
Speaker 5: people that don't see it by definition of not but
Speaker 5: not necessarily having to believe it to be opened and
Speaker 5: to something new. By definition of these individuals not seeing it,
Speaker 5: it will just simply be another day for them, and
Speaker 5: there would be no difference in changing their reality. And
Speaker 5: so what you have then is, depending on where you are,
Speaker 5: both will be true, but neither simultaneously and respectively.
Speaker 4: So this is what's called a super quantum potential.
Speaker 1: Basically, Dave, how far do you think that they can
Speaker 1: take the modern technological horrors such as AI and the
Speaker 1: intelligence behind that. Are you concerned with those realms and
Speaker 1: the people that'll be deeply involved in.
Speaker 5: That, If an honest, honest, honest perspective from what I
Speaker 5: can speak on, I'm very disappointed in the of course
Speaker 5: this speaks to something grander, like Churchill called it the
Speaker 5: Great Cabal, if we want to call it that. But
Speaker 5: I'm very disappointed in the fact that there were discoveries
Speaker 5: made many decades ago in particle physics that were never revealed,
Speaker 5: that could have been applied to every single field, and
Speaker 5: that would have therefore, by definition, changed the understanding of
Speaker 5: what we're even going through now, say, even in modern times,
Speaker 5: with the events of say, perhaps you know, the Ukraine War,
Speaker 5: whatever the case is, right, I think that that understanding
Speaker 5: of particle physics if as Einstein said, if I'm paraphrasing here,
Speaker 5: if and I wish it was, which it could be,
Speaker 5: in my opinion, explained at a very simple level, so
Speaker 5: not everyone needs to be into science to get it.
Speaker 5: If that was revealed at the time in which it
Speaker 5: was discovered, relative to modern history post World War two,
Speaker 5: I think we would be having a very different conversation
Speaker 5: in general now in terms of AI. In all of that,
Speaker 5: I'm not necessarily scared at all with what is public
Speaker 5: right now. I am again and I am very dare
Speaker 5: I say frightened by the what is behind the scenes,
Speaker 5: and largely because of the fact that there's a lack
Speaker 5: of general understanding of how it works, which goes right
Speaker 5: back to my again unfortunate disappointment in the again cover
Speaker 5: up of certain revelations that were made in particle physics
Speaker 5: many decades ago. So do I say, does that mean
Speaker 5: I have a negative aspect? No, absolutely not, absolutely not.
Speaker 5: But I think that there's been a I think that
Speaker 5: it would be it would be I would be remissed
Speaker 5: basically if I just sat here and said, well, I
Speaker 5: think it's all going to be fine.
Speaker 4: I think people like ourselves will be fine.
Speaker 5: I think for in that particular regard, because we will
Speaker 5: be able to discern, whether intuition or otherwise, with our
Speaker 5: own perspective and decide what we want to just you know,
Speaker 5: understand this potential AI you know, benefit and or threat
Speaker 5: as But I think we're going to have a I
Speaker 5: think if if there was more of a metaphysical and
Speaker 5: more of a general knowledge based understanding of this stuff,
Speaker 5: I wouldn't be as hesitant to say what I just said.
Speaker 3: Hmm, Right on.
Speaker 1: Now, Brandon, you mentioned the possibility earlier of exiting the matrix.
Speaker 1: We hear this a lot in our in our circles,
Speaker 1: people talking about is it possible to exit this what
Speaker 1: we understand as holographic reality or matrix? Is it that
Speaker 1: we would be able to exit or just is it
Speaker 1: that we'll be able to see more clearly what is
Speaker 1: beyond our limited perception at the moment? What do you think.
Speaker 4: You could could argue that's one and the same.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's both. It's just snowball effect.
Speaker 6: So as we begin to see, you're basically unfogging the
Speaker 6: glass of the dome and you're being able to see things,
Speaker 6: but they've manifest here in the way that reality can
Speaker 6: manifest in any way, because it seems to be like
Speaker 6: just structure of strings.
Speaker 2: Like in the end of what was that movie with
Speaker 2: Matthew McConaughey.
Speaker 6: A'll ride out right, Oh interestal, thank you, Interstellar at
Speaker 6: the end where he's just in that.
Speaker 5: That was stream in time space, whereas we would be
Speaker 5: existing in space time.
Speaker 4: There you go.
Speaker 6: And so the opposite of that, and so you have
Speaker 6: all this maluability here, and so things I think that
Speaker 6: are occurring are and we've talked about and and now
Speaker 6: that we that he's been here, all of these things
Speaker 6: pop up, like the thought of the phenomena all being
Speaker 6: one thing, or that it all being jin or that
Speaker 6: it's all just sort of a trickster thing that could
Speaker 6: shape shift. And then i'm, you know, applying then the
Speaker 6: filter of like, okay, well, they're just employees of this
Speaker 6: place here to wake you up. So then when we
Speaker 6: talk about this split sort of a thing, then we
Speaker 6: apply sort of the conversations we've had about the simulation
Speaker 6: about NPCs and about sort of a certain percentage of
Speaker 6: people here, let's say a great deal of them aren't real,
Speaker 6: let's say players of the game. They're again just sort
Speaker 6: of employees of the haunted house running around to scare you.
Speaker 6: But in that same respect, they hold energetic power here
Speaker 6: in the same way that you do. Now, as you ascend,
Speaker 6: the equal and opposite reaction must occur, like what I
Speaker 6: had showed over there in the drawing, as you go up,
Speaker 6: the forces go down. They must counter each other in
Speaker 6: equal and opposite direction, sort of like a sign wave.
Speaker 6: If a sign goes up, sign goes down. But it's
Speaker 6: the negative dotted line. It's the underneath of the visible
Speaker 6: sign wave that's there. It's the one underneath that it's
Speaker 6: trough at your apex, so as you expand, it expands
Speaker 6: as well, which then again would anchor this lower energy.
Speaker 6: Reminded again of the quotes like a man can't reach
Speaker 6: to heaven unless's roots reach to hell. All of these things,
Speaker 6: so you send those pieces of the experience down as
Speaker 6: you ascend in consciousness. Really the key is having conversations
Speaker 6: like this unfogging the glass that's in my mind, what
Speaker 6: this tower of babble is.
Speaker 2: This is sension, this thirty three.
Speaker 4: This portionality constant.
Speaker 6: Yeah, dude, I mean it's it's this just you you were,
Speaker 6: and then as it goes, it's a snowball effect. So
Speaker 6: the more things were able to perceive, like if you
Speaker 6: were okay, Chris, with an alien just popping in your
Speaker 6: room right now, we'd be closer to being able to
Speaker 6: do that. But I'm not that cool with that, you know.
Speaker 6: I'm okay with like one being introduced to one or
Speaker 6: being like knowing that it's coming. But as far as
Speaker 6: sudden shock introduction or pop in you know, these in
Speaker 6: those super things that may freak you out your consciousness
Speaker 6: or the game which is religious you perhaps that what
Speaker 6: I'm looking at it as wouldn't do that to you
Speaker 6: because it's counterproductive to the experience of waking up, Because
Speaker 6: waking up, you don't want to be shaken awake, you
Speaker 6: know what I mean.
Speaker 2: You want to be eased into it. Maybe hit the
Speaker 2: snooze a little bit.
Speaker 6: This is what they say about twenty twelve, that there
Speaker 6: was actually a reset, that there was a snooze button
Speaker 6: hit on the ending of the simulation because we weren't
Speaker 6: ready enough, we needed we were still too sweet.
Speaker 1: Is the simulation limited to what we understand as planet Earth?
Speaker 1: Do you think it goes beyond? Is the simulation the
Speaker 1: entire universe? Or is there something outside of what we
Speaker 1: consider our atmosphere that's not a part of the simulation?
Speaker 1: What do you guys think about that?
Speaker 6: It's all what you believe it is. So the simulation
Speaker 6: started you with the story of gravity, of mom and dad,
Speaker 6: of right and wrong, of hot and cold, of all
Speaker 6: of those things, and you've really anchored into that story.
Speaker 6: We all have these parts of our consciousness have which
Speaker 6: kind of is a self built in mechanism to the simulation,
Speaker 6: if you want to say it that way, Because ideally
Speaker 6: anything can happen here, anything can happen here. Let's say
Speaker 6: that there's a directive or a focus, that there's a
Speaker 6: particular mission, and so you'd want to govern the parameters
Speaker 6: in a way by therefore governing your perspective of that
Speaker 6: you are this huge, infinite creator. Even when you discover
Speaker 6: it within the game, your perspectives from belief a long
Speaker 6: time ago are so ingrained that it would take you
Speaker 6: possibly the rest of your life to unlearn those. So again,
Speaker 6: it sort of seems like an ice wall. It's a
Speaker 6: built in environmental standard here to be part of the mechanism.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 2: It's sort of how I see it.
Speaker 5: If we think of like a sorry, if we think
Speaker 5: of like a tree, and we have one branch of
Speaker 5: a tree, for example, and that branch particularly can only
Speaker 5: grow to the to the threshold to the extent in
Speaker 5: which the trunk's threshold grows perfect and so that would
Speaker 5: basically be a proportionality constant. So it's still growing in
Speaker 5: a fractal sense, but it's based its limits are based
Speaker 5: on what the trunk. Basically, the trunk's existence of being
Speaker 5: permits it to. And the trunk is not necessarily saying
Speaker 5: yes or no to the branch. It's just the trunk
Speaker 5: itself just existing already by definition of its existence, has
Speaker 5: created a parameter where basically there are certain This is
Speaker 5: what speaks to the concept of what's called finite theory.
Speaker 4: For example, so there's.
Speaker 5: Only x amount of say, directions and growth rates and
Speaker 5: growth sizes that the branch can take because it is
Speaker 5: a fractal of the trunk itself. In that regard, now
Speaker 5: the question is if we can get back to the
Speaker 5: trunk and understand the trunk for what it is by definition,
Speaker 5: then there would be an infinite amount of possibilities and
Speaker 5: there would be no confinement, which speaks again to the
Speaker 5: idea of just exploring what life is and the joy
Speaker 5: is in the journey and so on and so forth.
Speaker 5: So this also gives potential substantiation to certain elements of
Speaker 5: government and military. That again, if for the sake of
Speaker 5: hyper speculation, if say we assume there is one or
Speaker 5: two of them out acting on good faith, stating basically that,
Speaker 5: for example, the Israeli Space Defense minister who said former
Speaker 5: one Maimaschad, who said that you know, there's aliens working
Speaker 5: with humans on Mars and all this kind of stuff,
Speaker 5: and he basically came out and said, I don't care
Speaker 5: if anyone laughs or believes me either way, because I
Speaker 5: have my I'm retired, i have my degrees, I've written books.
Speaker 4: I don't care.
Speaker 5: I've gotten some of the highest clearances of Israeli government.
Speaker 5: It's almost as if it's interesting to see that allegedly
Speaker 5: some of these beings, whether they're us from the future
Speaker 5: or not or both or you name, it always come
Speaker 5: back to saying we may know more than you, but
Speaker 5: we don't know everything either.
Speaker 6: There's a lot of exploratory processes. When contact days report
Speaker 6: these great visiting their room, they'll pick up a pen
Speaker 6: and just like chew on it.
Speaker 2: Now, what the fuck you don't know what a pin is?
Speaker 4: Dude?
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you're running a spaceship around like that people.
Speaker 5: And this goes back to the concept of this idea
Speaker 5: of we have to think for a moment that if
Speaker 5: that's the case, they're running these advanced ships for example,
Speaker 5: and then you know, I've even spoken to people privately
Speaker 5: where they've claimed to have been on ships.
Speaker 4: And then you know there's beings asking them why do
Speaker 4: you like? You know?
Speaker 5: Craft is then cloaked on a beach and they're looking
Speaker 5: around these beings saying, how come your people socialize like this?
Speaker 5: It's very interesting to see, which is why what I
Speaker 5: was saying before. They don't understand our technology, perhaps in
Speaker 5: our social and anthropological you know, in certain ways interactions,
Speaker 5: but they have an understanding of science, not technology, but
Speaker 5: science that is very similar to what Einstein did to
Speaker 5: Newton in terms of getting to more fundamental processes. So
Speaker 5: they can then fly that craft or you know, mand
Speaker 5: the craft or maneuver a pilot it head to other dimensions,
Speaker 5: but still not know what the hell's going on, so
Speaker 5: they end up chewing on a pen. Yeah, so that
Speaker 5: we have to consider that as well in my opinion.
Speaker 6: So I definitely also have thought about this. And in
Speaker 6: relation to what you said, now to the tree, real quick,
Speaker 6: beautiful analogy. Trees are restricted by their environment and not
Speaker 6: necessarily their genes because if we think it epigenetics, like
Speaker 6: what doctor Bruce sahe Lipton talks about, how we're capable
Speaker 6: of extending past our genes or perceived limitations genetically.
Speaker 2: Right, So to our trees. Look at Devil's Tower in
Speaker 2: Wyoming Rift.
Speaker 6: Allegedly there's a lightar that was taken where the whole
Speaker 6: root structure to match what a tree would have been
Speaker 6: above that. You can take a ground penetrating radar of
Speaker 6: any tree. You see the root structure underneath matches the
Speaker 6: branches above basically in volume and spread, so that they
Speaker 6: can support underneath what the top tree wants to experience
Speaker 6: and fly and row to feed them under right, it's
Speaker 6: this cyclical environment.
Speaker 2: One's in the dark, one is not.
Speaker 6: So it's this exact sort of model that we've been
Speaker 6: talking about here with this yeah, and so what was
Speaker 6: the so the tree and then what was the thing
Speaker 6: you finished on.
Speaker 5: About how they owe the idea of how there's a
Speaker 5: more fundamental.
Speaker 6: Yes, so grays, we've we've talked about grays, and you
Speaker 6: hear contact reports of them being sort of on autonomous
Speaker 6: like sort of vehicles like sort of just robots or whatever.
Speaker 6: And then also contact reports have said, multiple have said
Speaker 6: that the grays refer to us as vehicles as vessels.
Speaker 6: So then you think, well, maybe everything here is a
Speaker 6: goddamn vessel, because then you have like the matrix and
Speaker 6: maybe it's not like some plug outside.
Speaker 5: Speaks to what a lot of papers now have been
Speaker 5: discussing in the peer reviewed literature with respects to a
Speaker 5: potential holo fractal morphogenic reality, which gives rise to Boemyan
Speaker 5: decoherence and bomy in holography and all that.
Speaker 6: This is where you get the mister Smith effect that
Speaker 6: anything can turn into a representative of the matrix at
Speaker 6: any time. This is where you'll be talking to someone
Speaker 6: having a normal conversation, then all of a sudden you're like, hey,
Speaker 6: what do you think the good I.
Speaker 1: Have to get it up for a second. You guys
Speaker 1: know Trey Hudson from the Metal Project. I was talking
Speaker 1: to him the other day and he has the same
Speaker 1: theory about the Men in Black, that they may be
Speaker 1: reinhabited by this intelligences and be working on behalf of
Speaker 1: something else when they go investigate these things.
Speaker 5: It gives credence to the idea, for example, of the
Speaker 5: forming in addition to everything said here, not in replacement of,
Speaker 5: but in addition to eggrigors or for you know, thought
Speaker 5: constants being some type of So this idea that in
Speaker 5: some cases I want to be careful here because I'm
Speaker 5: not saying this is the end all be all, far from,
Speaker 5: but that ghosts or spirits that tend to in some
Speaker 5: cases haunt people troll them, you know, take the clothes
Speaker 5: out of their laundry, bask you know, mess with them
Speaker 5: in that sense, stack chairs and all that, you know,
Speaker 5: make things fall or clocks go flying or what have you. May,
Speaker 5: in fact, in some cases be a very deep internal
Speaker 5: we could say, feedback loop of some type of traumatic
Speaker 5: thought that is being manifested without realizing on the front
Speaker 5: end of that individual. Hence the idea of oh, wherever
Speaker 5: I move, this being is always with me. Well, okay,
Speaker 5: I'm not trying to say that that is the end
Speaker 5: all be all, but the idea of again being in
Speaker 5: the present, general, the past, and the future. And if
Speaker 5: it's if it's possible from the perspective of a ghost
Speaker 5: or a spirit that it's in the material world, and
Speaker 5: then we're the spirits, yes, then it's again that gives
Speaker 5: the idea of it's both but neither simultaneously, which would
Speaker 5: be a quantum superpositioning potential.
Speaker 6: And what's more, it could be just a program, a
Speaker 6: glitch in the matrix, a time loop, which also we've
Speaker 6: talked about, right, and so to this then you would say, okay, well,
Speaker 6: like if they can do that, then why can't we
Speaker 6: do that? Right? My boundless out to miss as is
Speaker 6: like flip the script on the rushes, right, And so
Speaker 6: then you would say, okay, well, what if we can
Speaker 6: find the ability to create a zero gravity craft. And
Speaker 6: perhaps this is why we're told, and I love Dave
Speaker 6: what you said about the localized environment, we're told that
Speaker 6: people are murdered all the time for discovering things that
Speaker 6: are right here under your noses that could be beneficial
Speaker 6: to you in an awesome way, perhaps escaping the matrix
Speaker 6: at some point. Now also to this that perhaps is
Speaker 6: a siop, you know, to scare you off. But if
Speaker 6: you don't allow it to there's a lot of cool
Speaker 6: dope shit over here.
Speaker 4: When you start.
Speaker 6: Exploring it and you just tell that resistance to fuck off.
Speaker 6: Now again, the resistances will pop up as these representatives
Speaker 6: from the matrix until they no longer need to it,
Speaker 6: as like they're anamorphous from a fog like those remember
Speaker 6: those things They were needle They were like flat needles
Speaker 6: on the back and there were a plexiglass and you
Speaker 6: could like stick your face in it or your hand
Speaker 6: and it would come through on the other side. But
Speaker 6: it will imprints. Okay, same thing with your reality. There
Speaker 6: you go Okay, same thing, right, So this is sort
Speaker 6: of how they manifest. They're all out of a fog
Speaker 6: that's all around you, and they just pop up your
Speaker 6: unsupportive parent when you really need them to be like interesting, shit,
Speaker 6: you're just like, oh my god, it's in everything.
Speaker 4: You got it.
Speaker 6: And so again it's then too this, like what if
Speaker 6: the hack is to then perhaps transfer our consciousness to
Speaker 6: one of these vessels that can escape the matrix, perhaps
Speaker 6: like a gray or maybe there's some fortification we can
Speaker 6: do biologically, because perhaps we're only limited number one by
Speaker 6: our fucking mind and that's always the reality. Number two
Speaker 6: by a perceived limitation. But again, if we could at
Speaker 6: least get to the point where we could transfer that,
Speaker 6: then maybe that's an escape out or apprehendic and those
Speaker 6: are like the keys that can slip out, sort of
Speaker 6: like an Avengers. When it took the staff to pierce
Speaker 6: the you had to have something to pierce that innerte
Speaker 6: barrier that was in resonance with it. So maybe that's
Speaker 6: well resonance with it.
Speaker 5: It's the idea of four sequels mass times acceleration, the
Speaker 5: same way that an acoustic you know you have appropriate
Speaker 5: density of sound can then.
Speaker 2: Shatter glass simply.
Speaker 5: So what's happening is there's a proportionality constant between the
Speaker 5: resonant frequencies of the frequencies that are comprising the mass
Speaker 5: of the glass, particularly the mass, and then the sound
Speaker 5: that is omitting to it. So when Newton says four
Speaker 5: sequels mass times acceleration, I would strongly agree with him
Speaker 5: there when again, if you can get something to match
Speaker 5: the acceleration at which the mass of an object is
Speaker 5: resonating ad or within, then you'd be able to then
Speaker 5: manipulate it, which gives credence to the holofracto morphogenic concept.
Speaker 4: The question and becomes what is mass?
Speaker 5: And that's something that publicly has been kind of run
Speaker 5: in circles for for many many not even years, but decades,
Speaker 5: perhaps because we know that mass and weight are different.
Speaker 5: But it's this idea of you know, for example, if
Speaker 5: we discover what masses, that may be able to insert
Speaker 5: that final variable into Einstein's gr equations that would then
Speaker 5: bring everything fully together.
Speaker 6: So really, like I said, it's conversations like this, we
Speaker 6: are breaking the matrix right now. In the nast dole
Speaker 6: of the Tower of Babble got built on top of
Speaker 6: this because it's just awareness. It's about being able to
Speaker 6: perceive what's bigger impossible.
Speaker 2: That's all a r right precisely, like the key to
Speaker 2: all this shit really is that easy.
Speaker 4: I love it.
Speaker 1: This broadcast is changing the fabric of reality as we speak.
Speaker 1: Hell yeah, man, is there anything else important that we
Speaker 1: should cover? Anything you think we should throw in there
Speaker 1: before we close out today?
Speaker 5: I was just gonna say, actually, I myself, Actually it's
Speaker 5: a perfect timing because I was just gonna ask if
Speaker 5: I could just plug some of my stuff and then
Speaker 5: I going to jump on it. But yeah, no, that's
Speaker 5: thank you so much for having us, especially even myself
Speaker 5: at the last minute here when Brandon told me, I
Speaker 5: was very excited when I heard it was you, brother,
Speaker 5: I said, absolutely so. Just again, for anyone interested, Generation
Speaker 5: Z spelled the Generation space zed on Podbean, Apple, podcast,
Speaker 5: Spotify and YouTube of course, but where the real magic
Speaker 5: happens basically is at Patreon dot com slash generation z,
Speaker 5: where I write papers, the papers that I can then
Speaker 5: put out for In some cases, what I consult for
Speaker 5: I then put out for the members.
Speaker 4: We do call.
Speaker 5: We have calls where we discuss things like this. For example,
Speaker 5: group calls and many different things. Loads more of content
Speaker 5: insights on. I recently put a video up with Brandon
Speaker 5: graciously filmed on how to basically if one wanted to
Speaker 5: generate free energy from the Earth, if anyone was interested
Speaker 5: in that, similar to either receiving or transmitting.
Speaker 4: So all that kind of stuff.
Speaker 5: If any would be would be interested, please check it
Speaker 5: out Patreon dot com, slash generation z, no space, no capitals,
Speaker 5: And I want to thank you so much for having
Speaker 5: me man, Truly, it was a pleasure and an honor,
Speaker 5: So thank you.
Speaker 1: Yes man, thank you so much for coming on this.
Speaker 4: This is a real.
Speaker 1: Experience today, Brandon. Let everybody know where they can find
Speaker 1: your wonderful stuff.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much, man, and thank you for having
Speaker 2: us brother.
Speaker 6: When I got the text this morning, I was like,
Speaker 6: oh my god, I can't wait for Dave to wake
Speaker 6: up and we can do this.
Speaker 2: So thank you again. This is badass.
Speaker 6: You find it Expanding Reality podcast dot com. That's where
Speaker 6: everything links to. That's the mothership.
Speaker 2: I would go there.
Speaker 6: Another thing I will plug though, is our Expanding Reality
Speaker 6: Expanded Insight in Episodic Reflection Volume one. This is the
Speaker 6: book that we put out to a company.
Speaker 1: The oh, my girlfriend's one of my girlfriend's friends just
Speaker 1: purchased one of those from from Amazon.
Speaker 2: Bad ass. Well, thank you very much.
Speaker 6: Yeah, and it's got our it's our publishing house, which
Speaker 6: that's what I'm so proud of, is our publishing house. There,
Speaker 6: so any content creators looking to add value for their
Speaker 6: audience or for anything. If you got coaching, you want
Speaker 6: to do a bigfoot tracker, we do all kinds of stuff, fiction,
Speaker 6: non fiction, kids books, all kinds of shit.
Speaker 4: Guys.
Speaker 6: It's legit as fuck, so reach out for that. And
Speaker 6: that's what I got to plug in due Chris again,
Speaker 6: thank you so much.
Speaker 4: Dave, thanks, thank you, guys, thank you.
Speaker 1: This was amazing and I know there are some major
Speaker 1: minds blown out there. We'll have to do this again, guys.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much, and until next time, everyone, have
Speaker 1: a fantastic evening. We'll talk. If you're looking to start
Speaker 1: your therapeutic microdosing journey but don't know where to start,
Speaker 1: especially when looking for the highest quality ingredients including new
Speaker 1: tropics and what you'd expect from a true microdose capsule,
Speaker 1: check out our friends at Brain Supreme. They offer the
Speaker 1: absolute highest quality ingredients so you can start your microdosing
Speaker 1: journey knowing that you're getting top notch ingredients. To find
Speaker 1: out more, visit their website using that link right in
Speaker 1: the description and you can get fifteen percent off your
Speaker 1: entire order. Hello friends, I am so excited to tell
Speaker 1: you about Independent Media Token. Independent media Token is a
Speaker 1: brand new way to show your support for independent media
Speaker 1: without having to donate a dime. Independent media Token is
Speaker 1: a cryptocurrency on the Salana blockchain designed to generate funds
Speaker 1: to promote and foster the growth of independent content creators,
Speaker 1: allowing them to engage in their art without having to
Speaker 1: worry about being demonetized, through a network of media partners
Speaker 1: of which you yourself can become a part of. Independent
Speaker 1: Media Token's goal is to ensure the powers that be
Speaker 1: can never cut off all of our areas of funding
Speaker 1: and censor the only free voices left in the world.
Speaker 1: Join the movement today. You can pick up Independent Media
Speaker 1: Token using Phantom wallet or the Solana wallet of your choice,
Speaker 1: where you can easily swap your Solana for IMT. Grab
Speaker 1: some IMT today and remember to always know your team.
Speaker 1: To learn more, visit independentmediatoken dot com or use the
Speaker 1: link right in the description. Are you and your family
Speaker 1: prepared for an emergency? Maybe the fake alien invasion? Now's
Speaker 1: the time to prepare yourself and your family for any event.
Speaker 1: Check out prep starts Now. Their mission is to provide
Speaker 1: high quality preparedness products that empower individuals and families to
Speaker 1: be ready for any situation. They're committed to delivering reliable,
Speaker 1: trusted gear to ensure your safety, security, and peace of
Speaker 1: mind in times of need. Their product selection is carefully
Speaker 1: curated to provide you with the essential gear you need
Speaker 1: to stay prepared. From emergency kits to tactical tools, Every
Speaker 1: item is chosen for its reliability and practicality. Prep starts
Speaker 1: Now understands the importance of family, and their goal is
Speaker 1: to equip you with everything you need to build a
Speaker 1: solid plan for your family's preparedness. In today's ever changing world,
Speaker 1: being prepared is more important than ever, and prep starts
Speaker 1: Now is here to help you and your family stay
Speaker 1: ready with quality product and practical guidance. Use the link
Speaker 1: in the description and get fifteen percent off your order.
Speaker 1: We live in an incredible age of information. More and
Speaker 1: more we're discovering that we've been lied to and misled
Speaker 1: about much of our human history. Corey Hughes is providing
Speaker 1: profound revelations about World War I, World War II, the
Speaker 1: JFK assassination, Martin Luther King's assassination, and much much more
Speaker 1: on his new substack, Bloody History. Subscribe now for as
Speaker 1: little as five dollars monthly. Just click that link right
Speaker 1: in the description to get started now and learn about
Speaker 1: our true history.