Speaker 1: Twelfth studio failure this morning.
Speaker 2: The new one. Yeah, the new studio failed.
Speaker 1: And you know, my attitude with that is kind of
Speaker 1: just like, yeah, if we can't make cameras in a
Speaker 1: computer work, And despite all the previous failures we've had,
Speaker 1: there's not a single person here who can make sure
Speaker 1: that either the studio's operating or secondary studios operating. We've
Speaker 1: gotten to a point in the company where everyone's kind
Speaker 1: of just kicked their feet up and said, I'm doing
Speaker 1: what I need to be doing. Yeah, and then that
Speaker 1: just means I'm Sisyphis pushing the rock up. The problem
Speaker 1: is people are sitting on the rock, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean?
Speaker 2: Yeah, Yeah, could it be could Timcast actually be ending?
Speaker 2: I don't know, I don't know what this junction. Let
Speaker 2: me first say I think that Tim Poole and that
Speaker 2: entire operation is fantastic, and I think that they have
Speaker 2: done more to highlight dissident viewpoints than basically any large platform.
Speaker 2: I mean, right up there with Rogan, he does it
Speaker 2: every single night he has I mean, I guess not
Speaker 2: every night is there a dissident up there, but I'd
Speaker 2: say the majority of the time he has someone up
Speaker 2: there that otherwise probably would not be able to speak
Speaker 2: to an audience in the in the millions, as I've
Speaker 2: done myself probably a dozen times. By now, He's had
Speaker 2: on so many great people, and I think he's done
Speaker 2: a phenomenal job. Honestly, I think he works really, really hard.
Speaker 2: I think that the people there are really good people,
Speaker 2: and I totally understand why he wants to quit one
Speaker 2: hundred percent. Get it. For those that aren't super familiar
Speaker 2: with me, I did run a mortgage company before I
Speaker 2: became a podcaster, and it's tough. It's tough to have
Speaker 2: to try and manage people. This is why I didn't
Speaker 2: have employees. I used contracting arrangements for everything because it's
Speaker 2: just such a pain to try and actually have people
Speaker 2: that you're responsible for everything. Basically, I just made it
Speaker 2: so that they either get the job done and they
Speaker 2: get paid, or they don't and I go with someone else,
Speaker 2: and that, to me, worked best. But Tim has grown.
Speaker 2: Timcast dirl into a probably a forty person operation. I
Speaker 2: don't know the exact numbers, but it seems very significant,
Speaker 2: and it's obvious to me that he is he is
Speaker 2: suffering the consequences of his success and that he has
Speaker 2: tried to endeavor to expand the operation far outside of
Speaker 2: what it began. As for those that don't know the history,
Speaker 2: Tim actually began as a YouTuber skateboarder. Then he transitioned
Speaker 2: to a street reporter doing kind of men on the
Speaker 2: Street interviews and covering Occupy Wall Street, and then he
Speaker 2: started to do Timcast I guess was just a straight
Speaker 2: news show solo operation that he would do a couple
Speaker 2: times a day, became extraordinarily successful, and then decided to
Speaker 2: do Timcast Dirl. Apparently the iteration of that evolved and
Speaker 2: it became what it is today, and it has become,
Speaker 2: as far as I know, the number one nightly news
Speaker 2: program on YouTube, so tremendous success. Like whether you liked
Speaker 2: him or not, that's irrefutable. And I think that his
Speaker 2: operation is reflective of his efforts and his energy and
Speaker 2: obviously the fact that he had a vision for something
Speaker 2: that didn't exist yet and he was the first to
Speaker 2: move on it. So I commend him for that. And
Speaker 2: I'm not sure that his decision is final and that
Speaker 2: he in fact will be shutting down the operation permanently
Speaker 2: this week or not. I've reached out to him. He
Speaker 2: and I have become pretty good friends over the past
Speaker 2: couple of years, and at least I think so. I
Speaker 2: don't know if he would agree, but I think we're friends,
Speaker 2: and I messaged him. I'm sure he got bombarded with
Speaker 2: messages from people after the announcement last night that he
Speaker 2: was strongly considering shutting down timcast Iro, but I messaged him,
Speaker 2: and I just offered him my basically a sounding board.
Speaker 2: Because I was an entrepreneur and kind of a sole proprietor,
Speaker 2: I very much understand what he's going through. When I
Speaker 2: was growing, I had opportunities to expand and do a
Speaker 2: bunch of creative things that I ultimately chose not to
Speaker 2: because I didn't want to deal with the stuff that
Speaker 2: he's dealing with. So I think that I would be
Speaker 2: in a good position to give him some advice if
Speaker 2: he needs it. I'm also the type that never asks
Speaker 2: for advice and never calls anybody or asks anybody for
Speaker 2: assistance or a shoulder to cry on. I just don't
Speaker 2: do that. So he's probably like me and probably will
Speaker 2: not be reaching out, but I figured I would offer nonetheless. Also,
Speaker 2: this is public knowledge, so I can obviously talk about it.
Speaker 2: But he and I were in talks to have me
Speaker 2: be the CEO of Casprew as well as the host
Speaker 2: of Poker with the Boys, which never got off the ground.
Speaker 2: That didn't happen. We couldn't come to terms, and that's fine,
Speaker 2: you know, certainly, no big deal on my end. I
Speaker 2: don't really want to become a CEO for coffee company
Speaker 2: at this junction. I'm much more interested in focusing on
Speaker 2: what I do currently. But I was willing to because
Speaker 2: I thought that the opportunity was interesting enough and the
Speaker 2: other arenas that are more in align with my passions.
Speaker 2: So who knows. But here's the truth. I don't think
Speaker 2: I can work. I don't think I can keep up
Speaker 2: with him at this point. Like he when he says
Speaker 2: he works sixteen hours a day, like he ain't lying.
Speaker 2: Homeboy works non fucking stop like that. Dude goes hard,
Speaker 2: and I'm not really at that phase of my life anymore.
Speaker 2: Like I don't want to work that hard. I think
Speaker 2: most people, if they're being honest, they don't want to
Speaker 2: work that hard either. I think that's gonna be his
Speaker 2: major struggle is that, Like he even said it on
Speaker 2: the show last night. He's like everybody's you know, for
Speaker 2: the most part, working hard, and they, for the most part,
Speaker 2: everybody gets ninety percent of their job done, and he's like,
Speaker 2: but I have to pick up the extra ten. And
Speaker 2: I'm just thinking to myself, like, yeah, but what is
Speaker 2: a hundred, Like what are you actually asking of these people?
Speaker 2: Because maybe ninety is the maxing out their efforts. I
Speaker 2: don't know. I'm just you know, theorizing. But given how
Speaker 2: hard he works, I wouldn't be surprised if his demands
Speaker 2: on his employees is very steep. I don't know that
Speaker 2: for a fact. I've never actually seen what they're required
Speaker 2: to do. But when you're that hard charging, it kind
Speaker 2: of reminds me of Kobe Bryant, where like you'd have
Speaker 2: teammates that once they had the ring on their finger,
Speaker 2: they're like, I love this guy, Hall of Famer all
Speaker 2: the way, but if you were to interview the mid season,
Speaker 2: they're like, this dude's a lunatic. He works too hard.
Speaker 2: Nobody works this hard. He wakes up on off days
Speaker 2: at four am and goes and shoots, Like who does that?
Speaker 2: He's a total freak. I feel like Tim may be
Speaker 2: that type. I don't know for a fact, but I
Speaker 2: think that that could be part of what he's dealing with. Really,
Speaker 2: the issue is that once you get to this level
Speaker 2: of success, if you don't have everyone around you. That
Speaker 2: is also one I think they need to be profit sharing.
Speaker 2: I don't know if that's how his deals are structured
Speaker 2: with his employees, so that they feel inspired to work
Speaker 2: as hard as you, because obviously, when timcast or timcast
Speaker 2: Irol makes more money, Tim, you would think probably makes
Speaker 2: more money. So I in my opinion, if you're ever
Speaker 2: structuring an employment contract with people, it's highly I think
Speaker 2: that in order to get the best performance, it's probably
Speaker 2: good to have it tied to some sort of percentage,
Speaker 2: you know, spiff or bonus. Now that's not to say
Speaker 2: that that's the reason that things have fallen apart. Maybe
Speaker 2: it's even structured that way and it's just not working.
Speaker 2: I don't know, but I think that also it's just burnout,
Speaker 2: like and he never said the word, so I am
Speaker 2: pulling this out of thin air. And maybe he's not burnout,
Speaker 2: but I feel like if you're going to cover the
Speaker 2: day to day minutia of the news and do it,
Speaker 2: you know, two hours in the morning and then I
Speaker 2: think he does like another hour in the afternoon and
Speaker 2: then like another another two hours on IRL. So he's like,
Speaker 2: I don't know, if he's five hours live per day
Speaker 2: something nutty, and then he does it five days a week.
Speaker 2: That's that's an insane amount of work. So my belief
Speaker 2: is that he's probably just burnout. Like, I don't know
Speaker 2: how any human being wouldn't be burnt out doing that.
Speaker 2: I know there's a lot of AM radio guys that
Speaker 2: do stuff like that, but I think that at some
Speaker 2: point it just wears on you like how couldn't it
Speaker 2: or like how would it not? So that's kind of
Speaker 2: my original assessment as to what's going on, is that
Speaker 2: he's probably just burn out. If he is interested in
Speaker 2: my advice, my advice would be, take a week off,
Speaker 2: take two weeks off. Don't make this decision in the
Speaker 2: heat of the battle, Like what happened was for those
Speaker 2: that are totally in the dark. Apparently they've had systemic failures,
Speaker 2: is what he described it as. When it comes to
Speaker 2: the new studio and they moved to this brand new studio,
Speaker 2: it's phenomenal, huge skate park. Of course, it's the only
Speaker 2: way Tim does things and there was a graphics card
Speaker 2: that burnt out, and because of that, they ended up
Speaker 2: having to go back to the old studio last night
Speaker 2: to do the show, and Tim was clearly frustrated, exasperated
Speaker 2: or yeah, exasperated, Yeah, that's the right word. And I
Speaker 2: think that that's really what we're dealing with, is that
Speaker 2: he's just he's going so hard and then there's something
Speaker 2: that prevents him from continuing his normal pattern of doing
Speaker 2: the shows consistently, and he's just like, fuck it, I'm done.
Speaker 2: I don't blame him. He makes a crazy amount of money,
Speaker 2: and I think in a lot of ways he's suffering
Speaker 2: from his own success, you know, like, once you are
Speaker 2: making so much money, as he's very open about, he
Speaker 2: makes a ton of money, do you want to work
Speaker 2: as hard? You know, he's working sixteen hours a day.
Speaker 2: He could probably pick up more of these pieces if
Speaker 2: he work seventeen hours a day. And I bet, I
Speaker 2: bet Tim, before he was super wealthy, would have done that.
Speaker 2: But now that you're rolling in dough, do you still
Speaker 2: want to do it? And I think that the answer
Speaker 2: for most normal people is no, I've got enough money.
Speaker 2: Why the fuck am I working? And I'm only getting
Speaker 2: seven hours of free time per day. This is insane.
Speaker 2: I've got to cut back. But he's so hard charging
Speaker 2: he's been doing it so consistently for so many years.
Speaker 2: I could I could imagine, you know, a scenario where
Speaker 2: he's just like, he's kind of looking for an out
Speaker 2: where you don't want to quit, so you're gonna find
Speaker 2: reason to quit. Now, I'm not saying that's what he's doing.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying I could envision person in his position
Speaker 2: might look for that out. Maybe he found it, we'll see. Anyways,
Speaker 2: I just wanted to say, you know, to Tim, to
Speaker 2: the entire crew, you know, thoughts are with you, guys,
Speaker 2: And I love a bunch of those people over there.
Speaker 2: I mean, I don't know all of them, but a
Speaker 2: bunch of them are awesome, and they've become good friends
Speaker 2: of mine, and I feel like they're all they're all
Speaker 2: gonna land on their feet. And I personally think that
Speaker 2: there's a really good chance that Tim will decide to
Speaker 2: keep the show going, and I hope he does. I
Speaker 2: think it's a fantastic program that allows for, you know,
Speaker 2: open conversations about topics that don't get talked about nearly enough,
Speaker 2: and I think that's a huge value to the people
Speaker 2: of the world in America and it would be a shame.
Speaker 2: It would be a shame if we lose him. So
Speaker 2: cheers to you, Tim, Cheers to you, to the entire crew,
Speaker 2: and I hope you guys figure it out. I'm rooting
Speaker 2: for you, and if you need any help, I'm a
Speaker 2: call away. And one other note I would give to
Speaker 2: Tim is that if he doesn't want to step down
Speaker 2: as CEO, and he wants to maintain his CEO position,
Speaker 2: he has that option. Basically, what I would say to
Speaker 2: him is that, look, if you're going to be working
Speaker 2: sixteen hours a day, it's almost impossible for you to
Speaker 2: be on hand twenty four to seven manager that's necessary
Speaker 2: for an operation of this magnitude. You have the resources
Speaker 2: that are necessary to hire someone of the highest skill
Speaker 2: set and caliber to take over that very important role.
Speaker 2: Your role ought to be as the talent, to be
Speaker 2: the talent, So that should be your focus. It has
Speaker 2: been your focus, which is good, but that's the reason
Speaker 2: that other things are not getting accomplished. So my only
Speaker 2: recommendation to him, if he wants to maintain this operation
Speaker 2: at this magnitude, he can either downsize, continue to do
Speaker 2: the operation on a kind of a bare bones level,
Speaker 2: or you can bring in either a CEO, as Elon
Speaker 2: must did with Twitter with Yakarino, or you can have
Speaker 2: what's called a chief of staff or just a high
Speaker 2: level second in command. You need a second in command
Speaker 2: that can actually be the task master, the whip, the
Speaker 2: hiring firing guy. Don't go the HR route. Don't have
Speaker 2: an entire branch of HR people. Then you'll have to
Speaker 2: deal with woke nonsense and lawsuits and all that garbage.
Speaker 2: Don't do that. But you just need to basically give
Speaker 2: someone the authority to hire and fire. And I think
Speaker 2: that that would alleviate a tremendous amount of the issues
Speaker 2: that you've been dealing with, and it would free up
Speaker 2: more of your time so that you can focus on
Speaker 2: what you are best at, which is to be the talent.
Speaker 2: That's where you're really making the money, is that people
Speaker 2: tune in the vast majority of the time to watch
Speaker 2: you and to hear from you, as evidenced by all
Speaker 2: the success that you've had with Timcast News or the
Speaker 2: solo show that you do Timcast Dirol. Obviously, people tune
Speaker 2: in for the guests, but for the most part, they're
Speaker 2: there for you. That's the tie that binds, and I
Speaker 2: think that needs to be a priority. I think that
Speaker 2: the revenue stream that you've generated by doing all of
Speaker 2: these operations is fantastic. Many of the extraneous endeavors that
Speaker 2: you've laid out or tried to pursue that have not
Speaker 2: materialized or become profitable. I would highly recommend that if
Speaker 2: you don't have the heart to cut some of those,
Speaker 2: you need to bring in somebody that's willing to That's
Speaker 2: very simple. I'm probably not telling you anything that you
Speaker 2: don't already know if you're watching this right now, but
Speaker 2: I think that that would alleviate much of the stress,
Speaker 2: allow you to feel as if this operation is running
Speaker 2: more smoothly, and allow for you to focus on what
Speaker 2: you are truly great at, which is talking about the news.
Speaker 2: And I think that's probably the problem, is that you're
Speaker 2: now you're wearing too many hats, and you're forcing into
Speaker 2: two roles, and only one of which is your true passion.
Speaker 2: The other one is not, and I think that that's
Speaker 2: probably the issue. At the end of the day, I
Speaker 2: wish you tremendous success moving forward. And I hope that
Speaker 2: this is not the end of IRL. It has been
Speaker 2: a blessing to me, to my community, to the country,
Speaker 2: as far as I'm concerned, to have on voices like myself.
Speaker 2: If I don't get too egotistical by saying so, I
Speaker 2: think it's been a huge value. I'm really appreciative, and
Speaker 2: I think that there are hundreds of other people out
Speaker 2: there like me that have been on the show the
Speaker 2: same And I know the audience feels the same because
Speaker 2: many of them have become my audience and they tell
Speaker 2: me about it all the time. I found you on,
Speaker 2: Tim Kass, I'm so glad that I found you. You've
Speaker 2: been you know whatever, whatever, whatever nice things they've had
Speaker 2: to say to me. It has been a product of
Speaker 2: the opportunities that you've granted me by having me on
Speaker 2: the show a dozen times. And I think that there's
Speaker 2: a lot of people out there that are feeling like that.
Speaker 2: I don't know if you have quite the Belichick tree
Speaker 2: or the Joe Rogan tree, but you got your own tree, Tim,
Speaker 2: and and everybody on those branches is rooting for you.
Speaker 2: Keep going.
Speaker 3: I don't understand how we got so toxic and just.
Speaker 4: So divide and.
Speaker 3: So bitter, and I get why sometimes people just don't
Speaker 3: want to pay attention to it. And we all have
Speaker 3: friends like that, we have family members who just like
Speaker 3: you know, it's all a circus out there. I get that.
Speaker 2: Hey, brock Clint Russell here, so glad you asked, Well,
Speaker 2: it was actually twenty eleven. It was the NDAA reauthorization
Speaker 2: that repealed or basically replaced the Smith the Smith Moont
Speaker 2: Motters Act, which allowed you to propagandize us, as well
Speaker 2: as the executive order that you signed that very same
Speaker 2: year which mandated DEI departments across all federal bureaus in
Speaker 2: the United States of America. Or if that isn't what
Speaker 2: led to the toxicity, which I think it is, you
Speaker 2: could add to that the fact that it was your
Speaker 2: FBI which led to the FISA Court in the last
Speaker 2: year of your presidency to spy on Donald Trump, or
Speaker 2: the Steele dossier that was paid for by the Clinton campaign,
Speaker 2: Or it could be the eight hundred years that Donald
Speaker 2: Trump was facing for a bunch of things that were
Speaker 2: really not valid. I don't know, could be any of
Speaker 2: those things. But for you to feign incredulity is if
Speaker 2: you have not the slightest as to why things have
Speaker 2: gotten so toxic. Oh friend, Oh, I think you know,
Speaker 2: And if you're being honest with yourself, you should feel
Speaker 2: bad about it. You don't because you live in Martha's Vineyard,
Speaker 2: in a mansion that no one could even fathom owning,
Speaker 2: as you propagandize us about climate change and tell us
Speaker 2: that everyone's going to drowned because the caason rising, and
Speaker 2: you have this incredible, uh, you know, palatial estate right
Speaker 2: on the water. Anyways, you're a fraud and you're a
Speaker 2: con man, and you've actually played a tremendous role in
Speaker 2: destroying this country. And I'm just so appreciative that you
Speaker 2: asked why things have gotten so toxic because it gave
Speaker 2: me an opportunity to let you know.
Speaker 5: Do you regret signing onto the letter?
Speaker 6: Oh absolutely not, because those words are still true. It
Speaker 6: has all the classic coction. Oh absolutely not.
Speaker 5: No, this is no, it wasn't true, the classic ear marks.
Speaker 2: But it wasn't true. What is not true that it
Speaker 2: was Russian disinformation. That's not what we said in the letter.
Speaker 6: Read the actual letter and we said, we do not
Speaker 6: know if this is Russian disinformation.
Speaker 5: It has all the classic ear marks of a Russian
Speaker 5: information operation.
Speaker 6: Exactly the difference between an information that you're talking about
Speaker 6: the disinformation misinformation campaign. It's not my fault if people
Speaker 6: don't look up definiely, I.
Speaker 5: Know, but the purpose of the letter is to have
Speaker 5: an effect. And the nuance that you're talking about here
Speaker 5: never made it to candidate Biden because he said it
Speaker 5: plainly on.
Speaker 2: A debate stage.
Speaker 5: That obviously have affected the dynamic, don't you think.
Speaker 6: I would absolutely love for all news media to show
Speaker 6: nuance on all these issues instead of racing to sound bites,
Speaker 6: and in this case, some news media race to sound bites.
Speaker 6: That's not helpful for the American people. And I really
Speaker 6: wish that people.
Speaker 2: Helpful for the American people.
Speaker 6: Well, instead of quoting one sentence from it, people actually
Speaker 6: read maybe an entire paragraph. It shows that we don't
Speaker 6: know if it's Russian affected anything. I don't know if
Speaker 6: it affected anything, but we don't analyze American political environment
Speaker 6: trying to What we were trying to do is point
Speaker 6: out that this has all the classic ear marks of
Speaker 6: a Russian information campaign, not to say it's Russian disinformation,
Speaker 6: but to say that the propagation through American media and
Speaker 6: international media has all the classic ear marks of a
Speaker 6: Russian information campaign, because we've seen it over and over
Speaker 6: and over again. They love to sow these kind of
Speaker 6: divisions and exacerbate them. That's not American, that's Russian.
Speaker 3: I got you.
Speaker 5: Yeah, But it ended up being a Biden information campaign
Speaker 5: because he used it in the campaign and in that debate.
Speaker 6: I encourage you to ask him about that, and I will.
Speaker 2: So the reason I played that clip is because it's
Speaker 2: those type of activities that are happening at the federal
Speaker 2: level that are sowing such toxicity, such discontent amongst the
Speaker 2: American people, and to a large extent, that is a
Speaker 2: product of Barack Obama's tenure as the President of the
Speaker 2: United States. I mean that is one of the men
Speaker 2: who signed on to the letter that said that the
Speaker 2: Hunter laptop story had all of the hallmarks of a
Speaker 2: Russian information operation. Again, he was very clear there and
Speaker 2: very careful that he was saying. We weren't saying that
Speaker 2: the information was false. We were saying that it has
Speaker 2: the hallmarks of a Russian information operation in that its
Speaker 2: intent was to divide the American people. Well, when you
Speaker 2: put out a letter like that that implies that the
Speaker 2: contents of the story from the New York Post was
Speaker 2: in fact void, invalid. And then it comes out after
Speaker 2: the election election in which Donald Trump loses that in
Speaker 2: fact that story was not true, In fact, your letter
Speaker 2: was not true. Rather in that it was a true
Speaker 2: story and the laptop was real. Do you see how
Speaker 2: that would sow discontent? So as you're allegedly attempting to
Speaker 2: prevent the division that the Russians are attempting to sow.
Speaker 2: The Russians did not have an involvement with that story,
Speaker 2: and in fact you have now divided this country irreparably
Speaker 2: because of your actions. And you sit up there, unremorseful, unrepentant,
Speaker 2: unwilling to acknowledge the error or the danger of your actions.
Speaker 2: You and your fifty other brethren. It's reprehensible. Oh baby,
Speaker 2: we back Anton's land of Biltong. If you like a
Speaker 2: low carb, high quality protein snack, this is the one.
Speaker 2: This is the spot. You ain't got to look any further.
Speaker 2: I said yesterday that it was no carbs. It's not
Speaker 2: no carbs. There is low carbs. So I apologize. Let
Speaker 2: me correct the record, But if you are interested in
Speaker 2: checking this out, trust me once you try it, you
Speaker 2: will buy it multiple times. Land of Biltong dot com
Speaker 2: use promo code lockdown or lockdown ten, depending on how
Speaker 2: much you order to get the maximal discount. Again of
Speaker 2: Biltong dot com promo code lockdown. This stuff is South
Speaker 2: African beef jerkey. It's absolutely delicious. It's healthier than the
Speaker 2: vast majority of snacks out there. I love it. I
Speaker 2: he did it almost every day. It's basically keeping me
Speaker 2: alive at this point. It's fantastic. Land of Biltong, that's
Speaker 2: Land of b I L T O n G dot
Speaker 2: com promo code lockdown. It's extraordinarily dangerous for this country,
Speaker 2: and you've played a huge role in destroying the fabric
Speaker 2: that binds us together totally without remorse. Just absolutely remarkable.
Speaker 2: But I think that's the tie that binds is that
Speaker 2: his mentality is the same as Barack Obamas. They've done
Speaker 2: nothing wrong. Sure they may censor, Sure they may lie
Speaker 2: about the contents of major breaking news stories. Sure they
Speaker 2: may have thrown off one of the oldest American publications
Speaker 2: from social media in the days leading up to a
Speaker 2: major presidential election on a story that was in fact true.
Speaker 2: But did they do anything wrong? Did they regret anything, No, no,
Speaker 2: they don't. In fact, the only thing they regret is
Speaker 2: that you and I continue to exist and speak out.
Speaker 2: And I think that, at the end of the day,
Speaker 2: is what's dividing us most of all, is that more
Speaker 2: and more people like you and I are realizing the
Speaker 2: perspective that they have about all of us, that we
Speaker 2: are a problem to them, something that they would like
Speaker 2: to get rid of. And that doesn't feel very good,
Speaker 2: particularly when you were the hope and change candidate, Barack
Speaker 2: You were supposed to be the guy that puts the
Speaker 2: racist legacy of America behind us, and instead you decided
Speaker 2: to exacerbate it. You decided to make it worse. You
Speaker 2: decided to play off of racist stereotypes. After the American
Speaker 2: people voted largely and a huge, huge turnout to vote
Speaker 2: for the first black president not once, but twice, and
Speaker 2: then we came out of the other side of your
Speaker 2: tenure in a more divided, more race conscious, more racist state.
Speaker 2: By your own allegations, it did not help us. It
Speaker 2: hurt us. We paid a huge, huge price. You took
Speaker 2: the kindness and the non racism of the American people,
Speaker 2: you used it to your advantage. And then you divided
Speaker 2: us based off race as the gift that we received
Speaker 2: in return. How is that fair? How could you look
Speaker 2: in the mirror and say that you've done nothing wrong?
Speaker 2: And same to the fifty one intelligence agents that signed
Speaker 2: off on that letter. We all know what you were doing.
Speaker 2: You were running a cover operation to try and bury
Speaker 2: a story that was damaging to Joe Biden in the
Speaker 2: days prior to the election. It couldn't be more clear.
Speaker 2: That's what happened there. And you don't regret it because
Speaker 2: you did your job, because you wrote the letter, and
Speaker 2: you were very careful with your language, because you knew
Speaker 2: that you were lying, danced around the truth enough to
Speaker 2: make it so that you probably could never be truly
Speaker 2: held to account. And as a consequence, New York Posts
Speaker 2: and everybody else that was sharing that story was just
Speaker 2: suspended or banned entirely, and Joe Biden, by the skin
Speaker 2: of his teeth sales into the White House. You did
Speaker 2: your job, That's what you were asked to do. And
Speaker 2: from the research I've done, it looks like Anthony Blinken
Speaker 2: was actually responsible for ordering that. These people are dangerous man,
Speaker 2: and most people don't even understand the depravity or the
Speaker 2: depth of the depravity I should say, just so you
Speaker 2: know how I know. Here is a press release from
Speaker 2: the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence came out June
Speaker 2: twenty fifth of twenty twenty four, titled The Intelligence Community
Speaker 2: fifty one How CIA contractors colluded with the Biden campaign
Speaker 2: to mislead American voters. On October fourteenth, twenty twenty, the
Speaker 2: New York Post published a report detailing how Hunter Biden
Speaker 2: used the position and influence of his father, now President
Speaker 2: Joe Biden for personal gain with the apparent awareness of
Speaker 2: President Biden. Five days later, on October nineteen, twenty twenty
Speaker 2: fifty one, so five days later, come on fifty one
Speaker 2: former intelligence officials signed on to a public statement that
Speaker 2: stated that the Hunter Biden laptop story had all the
Speaker 2: classic ear marks of a Russian information operation in an
Speaker 2: attempt to discredit the New York Post reporting. Since April
Speaker 2: of twenty two, the committee have been conducting oversight into
Speaker 2: the origins of this statement. The committees wrote to all
Speaker 2: fifty one former officials requesting relevant documents and testimony. The
Speaker 2: Committee's first Joint Interim Staff report revealed how the now
Speaker 2: infamous and discredited Hunter. Biden's statement originated with a call
Speaker 2: from top Biden campaign official and now Secretary of State
Speaker 2: Anthony Blanken to former Deputy CIA director Michael Morrell to
Speaker 2: provide talking points and cover for the Biden campaign to
Speaker 2: discredit serious allegations about the Biden family's influence pedaling. Morell's
Speaker 2: testimony also exposed that the goal of the statement was
Speaker 2: to aid President Biden in the final debate of the
Speaker 2: twenty twenty presidential campaign, which, I might add, Joe Biden
Speaker 2: went on to do, Joe.
Speaker 7: They're calling you a corrupt politician, nobod.
Speaker 8: I want to stay on the issue of race.
Speaker 1: We're talking about a shop from hill.
Speaker 9: President Trump, We're talking about race right now, and I
Speaker 9: do want to stay on the issue of race.
Speaker 4: President tru have.
Speaker 7: To respond to that, please Loker. Our fifty former national
Speaker 7: intelligence folks who said that what this he's accusing me
Speaker 7: of is a Russian plant. They have said that this
Speaker 7: is has all the care. Four five former heads of
Speaker 7: the CIA, both parties say what he's saying is a
Speaker 7: bunch of garbage. Nobody believes it except them his and
Speaker 7: his good friend Rudi Giani.
Speaker 5: You mean the laptop is now another Russia, Russia, Russia hoax.
Speaker 7: Hey you, that's exactly this way, exactly what where.
Speaker 2: So, in fact, Joe Biden, whether he knew or not,
Speaker 2: is kind of irrelevant. He knew that what his son
Speaker 2: had done was was not good. And the head of
Speaker 2: the CIA, at the direction of Anthony Blincoln, so Morrell,
Speaker 2: at the direction of Anthony Blincoln, gets those fifty one
Speaker 2: active informer whatever whatever intelligence analysts to sign on to
Speaker 2: that letter, just so that during the debate, when Trump
Speaker 2: inevitably would bring up that laptop, that Joe Biden could say,
Speaker 2: with plausible deniability, not knowing whether or not they were right,
Speaker 2: that we had fifty four former intelligence agents and including
Speaker 2: five heads of the former heads of the CIA, that
Speaker 2: all say that this is a Russian this is a
Speaker 2: Russian plot. He lied, They lied, They all lied, They
Speaker 2: all lied to you just to try and get him
Speaker 2: into the White House and keep Trump out of power.
Speaker 2: And if you look at Trump's reaction to that, the
Speaker 2: incredulity with his response, where you go, you gotta be
Speaker 2: kidding me, this is another Russia, Russia, Russia. You gotta
Speaker 2: be kidding me. That was sincere. He couldn't believe it.
Speaker 2: Because that was the first time he had even heard
Speaker 2: of it, because he could have never imagined that you
Speaker 2: would have fifty intelligence agents that would sign onto a
Speaker 2: letter of such obvious deception. And that's what happened. Now,
Speaker 2: Let's listen to the head of the CIA as he
Speaker 2: describes it.
Speaker 10: I told him that I had received a call from
Speaker 10: Tony Blenkin, then a senior official on the Biden campaign,
Speaker 10: asking me if I had seen the New York Post
Speaker 10: story if my memory serves, and you know, I don't
Speaker 10: know exactly how you want to do this, but my
Speaker 10: memory sketchy, right, this is a long time ago. I believe.
Speaker 10: I believe I said I had not seen it. I
Speaker 10: believe he summarized it for me, and he asked me
Speaker 10: if I thought the Russians may have been involved in
Speaker 10: any way in the evergence of these emails.
Speaker 9: But prior to his call, your you did not have
Speaker 9: any intent to write this statement.
Speaker 10: I did not, Okay. So his call triggered yes intent
Speaker 10: in me. Yes, absolutely. What was the intent of their statement?
Speaker 10: There were two intents. One intent was to share our
Speaker 10: concern with the American people that the Russians were playing
Speaker 10: on this issue, and to it was to help Vice
Speaker 10: President Biden.
Speaker 2: So there's the former head of the CIA Morell saying that, yeah,
Speaker 2: the letter was at the direct orders of Anthony Blincoln,
Speaker 2: that they had no intention of writing it, that it
Speaker 2: was that call that inspired it, and that they wrote
Speaker 2: it explicitly to help Joe Biden, because the head of
Speaker 2: the CIA wanted Joe Biden to win. And on the
Speaker 2: inverse of that, obviously he wanted Donald Trump to lose.
Speaker 2: Now ask yourself, why why would they want Joe Biden
Speaker 2: to win? Oh, it could be that Joe Biden was
Speaker 2: on the Intelligence Committee for decades and basically signed off
Speaker 2: on any war, any operations, any funding that they ever wanted,
Speaker 2: whereas Donald Trump would periodically throw sand in the gears
Speaker 2: of the war machine and say, hey, what are we
Speaker 2: doing here? Why are we have this this terrorist group?
Speaker 2: Why do we have Al Qaeda fighting Isis? Aren't these
Speaker 2: both our enemies?
Speaker 4: You know?
Speaker 2: Trump, unfortunately he never dug deep enough to actually understand
Speaker 2: what was going on in the fact that all of
Speaker 2: these terrorist organizations had to some extent been funded by
Speaker 2: the American military industrial complex and the intelligence agencies. But
Speaker 2: he was smart enough to realize, Hey, I'm going around
Speaker 2: being told by the Intelligence Committee and all of my
Speaker 2: advisors that these are our enemies. So when they're fighting
Speaker 2: each other, why would we possibly intervene? Why wouldn't you
Speaker 2: just let them fight? Doesn't that make sense? Very very
Speaker 2: kind of like bro science way of doing geopolitical analysis.
Speaker 2: But it's better than Biden from my vantage point. At
Speaker 2: least he's asking obvious questions. He didn't dig enough to
Speaker 2: actually figure out the truth. But here's the truth is that, yeah,
Speaker 2: these are our organizations to some extent, that they work
Speaker 2: at the behest of the CIA oftentimes, and that when
Speaker 2: they're fighting each other, we don't like that because we
Speaker 2: want them to be around to do our bidding. So
Speaker 2: that's why they intervened Trump. Now, you know, man, that
Speaker 2: story about Morell is unbelievable. Anthony Blincoln and Morrell, I mean,
Speaker 2: what they did there was actively propagandizing the American people
Speaker 2: to help a political candidate. This is from the same
Speaker 2: party that will tell you that they are the defenders
Speaker 2: of democracy and truth, right, that they're interested in the truth,
Speaker 2: want to stop missindisformation? Right? Well, who was responsible for
Speaker 2: missing disformation in the lead up to the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 2: Ask yourself that and the answer is quite clear.
Speaker 5: So let me ask you this. Have you seen anything
Speaker 5: like the public statement to in a few years of experience?
Speaker 2: Like you mean with that many ought?
Speaker 4: But what's the like I think with that with that
Speaker 4: many signatories of that caliber, who had all had prestigious
Speaker 4: precisions within the intelligence community, especially at the CIA, people
Speaker 4: you knew personally.
Speaker 2: No, I have not seen anything of that nature.
Speaker 5: Breaking tonight, Hunter Biden appears in a federal courtroom in Delaware.
Speaker 5: He's preparing for a June third start to his trial
Speaker 5: on gun charges. We now know more about what evidence
Speaker 5: jurors will see, including the contents of that infamous laptop
Speaker 5: that the US government now says did in fact belong
Speaker 5: to Hunter.
Speaker 2: Of courseponded.
Speaker 5: David spot is in Wilmington tonight with the latest.
Speaker 4: Gleving dip.
Speaker 11: Rock. Good evening, and our viewers will remember that that
Speaker 11: laptop fifty one former intelligence officials back in twenty twenty
Speaker 11: before the election said that it was Russian disinformation. Turns
Speaker 11: out it with not Russian disinformation. Biden will be back
Speaker 11: here at this woman, Can Della work fourhounism on your pay?
Speaker 2: Are you ready to start building wealth by putting your
Speaker 2: precious metals to work. Silver isn't just a precious metal,
Speaker 2: it's a tangible asset and a great way to diversify
Speaker 2: any investment portfolio. By the way, I think it's at
Speaker 2: an all time high or like high over the past
Speaker 2: ten years. Just broke thirty five bucks an ounce, setting
Speaker 2: that aside. With monetary metals, you don't just own physical silver.
Speaker 2: You own silver that works for you to generate more silver,
Speaker 2: growing your total ounces over time. Right now, you can
Speaker 2: earn twelve percent annual interest on silver paid in silver
Speaker 2: in their latest offering. If you're an incredited investor, click
Speaker 2: the link of the description or head to monetary dash
Speaker 2: metals dot com slash lockdown to learn more. Monetary Metals
Speaker 2: is revolutionizing the way you invest in gold and silver.
Speaker 2: They've been paying interest in silver and gold for over
Speaker 2: eight years and helping you grow your wealth and real
Speaker 2: tangible assets. Finally, there's a true alternative to saving in
Speaker 2: dollars a yield on gold and silver with monetary Metals.
Speaker 2: This is the first true silver bond since eighteen thirty four.
Speaker 2: You can earn a twelve percent annual interest on silver
Speaker 2: paid in silver, but you must be an incredited investor
Speaker 2: to participate. It's a three year term and the bond
Speaker 2: is financing a publicly traded mining company located in the
Speaker 2: Western United States. Again, go to Monetary dash Metals dot com,
Speaker 2: slash lockdown or click the link of the description to
Speaker 2: learn more and the truth will set you free. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that was Hunter's laptop. Yeah, it had a lot of
Speaker 2: evidence of likely severe criminality when it came to Ukraine, China,
Speaker 2: a lot of other sordid stuff that I don't care
Speaker 2: as much about when it comes to drug use, but
Speaker 2: also some sexual peculiarities that deserve further investigation, to put
Speaker 2: it mildly, and the CIA actively covered it up at
Speaker 2: the behest of Anthony Blincoln Biden. And if you think
Speaker 2: that Hillary and Obama didn't do similar stuff like that,
Speaker 2: well of course they did it. In fact, I've already
Speaker 2: detailed it earlier that they were responsible for the Steel dossier,
Speaker 2: that they were responsible for the line to the fviceupcord,
Speaker 2: or at least it was Obama's FBI that lied to
Speaker 2: the f support in order to spy on the top
Speaker 2: contender for the White House in Donald Trump before he
Speaker 2: was even the president. Of United States. How is this
Speaker 2: stuff all not illegal? Why do we not ever talk
Speaker 2: about it? Why have we spent eight years talking about
Speaker 2: the criminality of Donald Trump and how he's this existential
Speaker 2: threat in this danger and blah blah blah, But we
Speaker 2: don't have any there's no adjudication for all of this depravity. Nothing. Ever,
Speaker 2: once you have this realization, this epiphany that in fact,
Speaker 2: the justice system only goes one direction, that it crushes
Speaker 2: political opposition and it lifts up and protects and defends
Speaker 2: those that are in their good graces, that's when you
Speaker 2: start to realize why someone like me, someone that has
Speaker 2: so many disagreements with Donald Trump, would like to see
Speaker 2: him prevail over the CIA and the FBI and the
Speaker 2: three letter agencies chosen candidate and Kamala Harris or Joe
Speaker 2: Biden or any of their other chosen candidates, Obama, Clinton,
Speaker 2: all of them. It's because that's how the system works,
Speaker 2: and I want to see that system break down because
Speaker 2: it's totally a moral it's totally illegal, and there's no
Speaker 2: justice to be found. So every time Donald Trump prevails,
Speaker 2: it defeats that that game plan, and that's a good thing.
Speaker 9: Donald Trump putting on a little McDonald's costume because he
Speaker 9: thinks that's what people do. They're not trying to empathize
Speaker 9: with us. They are making fun of us. They are
Speaker 9: making fun of us. Donald Trump thinks that people who
Speaker 9: work at McDonald's are a joke. Elon Musk thinks that
Speaker 9: dangling money in front of a working person is a
Speaker 9: cute thing to do when the election of our lives
Speaker 9: is before us, because that's what people and billionaires like that.
Speaker 2: For those unfamiliar, AOC is flipping out because Donald Trump
Speaker 2: had one of the most successful photo ops in American
Speaker 2: presidential campaign history. That was about the day two days
Speaker 2: ago now, but it was the outrage was insane. He
Speaker 2: had people, you know, pointing out that it was an
Speaker 2: op and that it was you know, they had actually
Speaker 2: shut down the McDonald's and the sure he was serving people,
Speaker 2: but they were already like curated customers and they knew
Speaker 2: who was coming. Yeah. Donald Trump has been shot at
Speaker 2: or you know, there's been two attempts on his life
Speaker 2: at minimum, maybe multiple multiple more than that potentially, and
Speaker 2: he has to have the Secret Service make sure that
Speaker 2: there's not some lunatic coming through the McDonald's drive that
Speaker 2: takes another shot at the guy. So yeah, we none
Speaker 2: of us actually thought that Donald Trump had dropped out
Speaker 2: of the campaign trail and became a fry cook at McDonald's.
Speaker 2: But the point I made was that the success of
Speaker 2: the tactic, the photo op, is proportional to the outrage
Speaker 2: that's created because they they have to spin this negatively
Speaker 2: because it was it went so well, so they have
Speaker 2: to try and find a way to make people think, oh,
Speaker 2: that wasn't actually a good thing, because it was obviously
Speaker 2: adorable to see Donald Trump serving people French fries, was adorable,
Speaker 2: to see a billionaire who takes a dump on a
Speaker 2: gold toilet to be you know, working the fry station, hilarious,
Speaker 2: whatever you want to call it. It was a great moment.
Speaker 2: Whether you like Trump or not, it was obviously awesome
Speaker 2: and they realized it. So they had had to do,
Speaker 2: you know, full court press to try and suppress it.
Speaker 2: But no one thought that they could wake up today
Speaker 2: and had to Mickey D's for a Trump prepared McMuffin.
Speaker 2: Yet the corporate news hacks have no choice but to
Speaker 2: try and paint this in a negative light, so they
Speaker 2: dutifully churn out stories as if we were actually tricked
Speaker 2: into believing a former president billionaire was now manning the
Speaker 2: fry station for eight bucks an hour. Trump's team knows
Speaker 2: that they will get zero positive coverage, so they've resorted
Speaker 2: to just doing positive things for people and letting the
Speaker 2: media demonstrate their own depravity by portraying it as somehow bad.
Speaker 2: They could have let the story die out, not nearly
Speaker 2: as many people would have known about it, but instead
Speaker 2: they went full court press, and now everyone has heard
Speaker 2: about it. Basically, TDS streies and effect. The fact that
Speaker 2: highlighted Harris's lies about her ever working there was just
Speaker 2: an added bonus. They managed to turn a dude who
Speaker 2: lives in a Manhattan skyrice penthouse and Florida mansion with
Speaker 2: a golden toilet no less, into your blue collar every
Speaker 2: man better. Yet their own seating contempt for the working
Speaker 2: class was made plain for all to see. And the
Speaker 2: best part, they did it to themselves. And they did.
Speaker 2: And I think that's the hilarious thing about AOC still
Speaker 2: pretending as if she's this bartender from the Bronx or whatever,
Speaker 2: but in fact she's a multimillionaire, as they all are eventually,
Speaker 2: and that's how the political system actually works, and that
Speaker 2: they are totally disconnected from the working man, and the
Speaker 2: fact that they were just so perplexed as to why
Speaker 2: Donald Trump would do this, why he would lower himself
Speaker 2: to go and work fast food, when millions of Americans,
Speaker 2: including myself, got their start at a fast food place.
Speaker 2: In fact, mine was at a Wendy's, so I'm sure
Speaker 2: many of you that was your first step on the
Speaker 2: economic ladder as well. It was kind of what people
Speaker 2: of my generation did. It seems less and less our
Speaker 2: kids are doing that, and I think a lot of
Speaker 2: that has to do with the fact that these jobs
Speaker 2: are taken up by immigrants. Now I could be wrong,
Speaker 2: maybe the kids just don't want to work, but I
Speaker 2: see very very few young people working fast food the
Speaker 2: way I did when I was a kid, when it
Speaker 2: was all young people, because that was the only people
Speaker 2: that would take those jobs because it was a very
Speaker 2: bad paying job, and if you had no experience, that
Speaker 2: was how you got experience, was to go take a
Speaker 2: bad paying job. That doesn't appear to be happening anymore.
Speaker 2: But I thought it was just a stroke of genius
Speaker 2: from his campaign advisor, whoever came up with that idea
Speaker 2: and it couldn't have gone better and it made the
Speaker 2: Democrats look atrocious. We've got a couple other stories that
Speaker 2: are developing. Don't have much to say on them at
Speaker 2: this point, but I do want you guys to be aware.
Speaker 2: According to Matt Taiebe's reporting earlier this morning along with
Speaker 2: Paul Thacker, which Elon Musk replied with, this is war,
Speaker 2: so he's taking it very seriously. Apparently there is a
Speaker 2: whistleblower that came out with internal documents that demonstrated that
Speaker 2: the advisor to Keure Starmer, the new Prime Minister of
Speaker 2: the UK, of this organization called CCD Hate. So he
Speaker 2: was advising the Labor Party, he's now advising Kamala Harris's campaign.
Speaker 2: And he was also the former head of the CCD
Speaker 2: Hate organization, which was an alleged non not for profit
Speaker 2: that was trying to get rid of hate speech on
Speaker 2: the internet. Blah blah blah. But in fact, according to
Speaker 2: the reporting by Thacker in Taibi document showing the Labor
Speaker 2: Parties Political Front's objective is quote kill Musk's Twitter end
Speaker 2: quote through quote advertising focus end quote meaning harass his advertisers.
Speaker 2: And then they have the internal documents provided by the
Speaker 2: whistleblower that demonstrated this case, and it's a fascinating story,
Speaker 2: very concerning that someone who has been responsible for trying
Speaker 2: to suppress my free speech, my primary outlet for how
Speaker 2: I get to reach the world, he is now advising
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris's campaign. That doesn't make me feel good at all.
Speaker 2: So we're going to keep our eyes on that one
Speaker 2: see if there's anything that comes of it, But as
Speaker 2: of now, it's just yet another hammer against Kamala Harris
Speaker 2: for president as best I can tell. There's also an
Speaker 2: alleged major security breach with a Pentagon senior staffer leaks
Speaker 2: Israel's Iran strike plans. So, for those that aren't aware,
Speaker 2: Israel had promised a some sort of response to the
Speaker 2: attacks that Iran launched in response to the attacks from Israel.
Speaker 2: Blah blah blah, you get the idea, And there was
Speaker 2: allegedly now a major attack that's going to come from
Speaker 2: Israel towards Iran, and the plans of that attack have
Speaker 2: been leaked by someone working in the Pentagon. A senior
Speaker 2: Pentagon staffer, Arion Tabatabai, has allegedly been identified as the leaker.
Speaker 2: Of highly classified documents detailing Israel's military preparations to strike Iran.
Speaker 2: The FBI is investigating this major breach, which has sent
Speaker 2: shockwaves through Washington and raised concerns about US intelligence security.
Speaker 2: This is from Mario Nafall. The leak documents allegedly revealed
Speaker 2: Israel's covert military activities in addition to a plan strike
Speaker 2: and retaliation for Iran strike earlier this month against Israel.
Speaker 2: So very interesting. Apparently this lady, I guess she was
Speaker 2: put in under Obama, that's what I read earlier, and
Speaker 2: may have been responsible for some of the Iran nuclear deal.
Speaker 2: But if she's responsible for leaking confidential documents of Israel's
Speaker 2: attack strategy, that would be a big deal. I think
Speaker 2: it's more disturbing from an American America first perspective. Why
Speaker 2: in God's name is the US privy to the detailed
Speaker 2: plans of the Israeli military as they strike Iran? Like?
Speaker 2: Is this our war? Is it not? Because I don't
Speaker 2: think that we would probably be sending out our detailed
Speaker 2: strike plans to every other country on Earth. But apparently
Speaker 2: we get there's in advance, so maybe we're a little
Speaker 2: bit more involved than we're being told about. What do
Speaker 2: you think? Yeah? I think probably so the Cheney thing,
Speaker 2: do we really have to do that?
Speaker 12: Look it goes broad in that. Look Bernie Sanders, Dick Cheney,
Speaker 12: Taylor Swift.
Speaker 6: No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
Speaker 2: Having on board.
Speaker 3: Nah, you can't Dick Cheney or Taylor Swift.
Speaker 8: Right, big.
Speaker 2: Country to Taylor Swift to get us you in vain?
Speaker 12: No, yeah, no, don't you think though that?
Speaker 2: And I do this, I believe this.
Speaker 12: Yeah, there is still a core group of folks out there,
Speaker 12: you know, your point being and not joke that. Don't
Speaker 12: tread on me the Reagan piece of this, the libertarian piece,
Speaker 12: but the constitutional piece.
Speaker 2: There are a lot of people out there. I think.
Speaker 12: I think Liz Cheney and Dick Cheney give permission to
Speaker 12: those folks who want to find a reason to do
Speaker 12: the right thing.
Speaker 2: Hey, Tim, no the fuck it doesn't. No, Actually the
Speaker 2: complete opposite. Friend, Seeing as you know nothing about libertarians,
Speaker 2: let me tell you we're not fans of Dick Cheney,
Speaker 2: and I don't think many conservatives are fans of him either.
Speaker 2: So this is just a total misread. And to me,
Speaker 2: the primary takeaway is that the Democrats are so disconnected
Speaker 2: from anybody who's not a lunatic leftist, that they can't
Speaker 2: relate to us at all. They can't relate to conservatives,
Speaker 2: they can't relate to libertarians. The fact that they think
Speaker 2: that this Dick Cheney endorsement is something to be advertising
Speaker 2: as opposed to being a shamed of when it comes
Speaker 2: to electoral politics is mind bending. What I have seen
Speaker 2: after the announcement of Dick Cheney's endorsement of Kamala Harris
Speaker 2: has been a galvanization of the libertarian movement more broadly
Speaker 2: when it comes to wishing her a loss, a brutal,
Speaker 2: brutal loss, because what it has told us is that,
Speaker 2: in fact, Kamala Harris will be the torch bearer for
Speaker 2: the neo conservative movement moving forward. Now, she may not
Speaker 2: market it as such, she may not speak in the
Speaker 2: same way that George Bush or a Dick Cheney may have,
Speaker 2: or Connale's a Rice or any of those folks call
Speaker 2: him pale, But in terms of what actually happens for
Speaker 2: the military industrial complex when it comes to warfare, yeah,
Speaker 2: she's their gal. It couldn't be more clear. And if
Speaker 2: you don't believe me, just flash back to a few
Speaker 2: minutes ago, when I was showing you the former acting
Speaker 2: director of the CIA that was saying as much that
Speaker 2: in fact, they wanted Biden to win. Of course, if
Speaker 2: the acting director of the CIA wanted Biden to win
Speaker 2: and was actually running ops to help him, well, then yeah,
Speaker 2: they feel the same way about Kamala Harris, if not
Speaker 2: more so since they forced Joe Biden out and her
Speaker 2: into his spot to run against Donald Trump. Clearly, she's
Speaker 2: the chosen one of the intelligence agencies. Clearly she's the
Speaker 2: chosen one of the military industrial complicts, and clearly she
Speaker 2: is the one that we ought to be rooting against.
Speaker 2: And thanks to Dick Cheney, it became clear to all libertarians, Yeah,
Speaker 2: we're not really a fan of her, nor are we
Speaker 2: a fan of Dick Cheney and Tim Walls. You are
Speaker 2: an embarrassment that you don't already know that, You laughable fool,
Speaker 2: You got a joke.
Speaker 8: This the guy who also wants to place every single servant,
Speaker 8: every single one, thinks he has a rated of the
Speaker 8: extreme ruling on immunity to be able if need be,
Speaker 8: if it was the case to actually eliminate, physically, eliminate,
Speaker 8: shoot and kill someone who is he needs to be
Speaker 8: a thread to him. I mean, so, I know this
Speaker 8: sounds bizarre. It sounds like I said this five years ago.
Speaker 8: He has locked me up. We gotta lock him up, politically, locked.
Speaker 2: Him up, We gotta lock him up. Not a joke. Politically,
Speaker 2: politically I like that he caught himself. But yeah, Party
Speaker 2: of Democracy, Democracy, you know, accidentally slipping that we got
Speaker 2: to lock him up. Well, it would seem like it's
Speaker 2: just a slip if not for the fact that you
Speaker 2: actually tried to lock him up. And he's been indicted
Speaker 2: multiple times, in charge with crazy amount of felonies and
Speaker 2: fined and shot at and you know, the list goes
Speaker 2: on and on. Look, I'm gonna be honest, We're gonna
Speaker 2: miss Joe a little bit. He's like the accidental version
Speaker 2: of Donald Trump on the left. Let me explain. Trump
Speaker 2: has no filter because he's just kind of a savage.
Speaker 2: Biden has no filter because his brain is broken. And
Speaker 2: you get the same outcome from time to time. Is
Speaker 2: that Trump because he's too much of a savag, We'll
Speaker 2: just tell the truth accidentally sometimes Biden, because he's so broken,
Speaker 2: will just tell you the truth sometimes, and you're like,
Speaker 2: oh my God, they're saying it out loud. They want
Speaker 2: to lock up Trump, and look, I think, in fairness
Speaker 2: to Biden, I don't think he has any clue what
Speaker 2: the actual plans are of the people who really run
Speaker 2: this country. I genuinely believe that. I do not think
Speaker 2: he's being right in at this point. I don't think
Speaker 2: he knows anything, but I think that it would be
Speaker 2: it's very reasonable to assume that there's a distinct possibility
Speaker 2: they do intend to use additional law, fair or extra
Speaker 2: judicial means to try and stop Donald Trump because based
Speaker 2: off of early voting right now, he is an enormous
Speaker 2: favorite to win the presidency. The betting markets have him
Speaker 2: at a sixty four percent odds of winning, which is
Speaker 2: the highest it's ever been. And that's because the early voting,
Speaker 2: which usually went heavily Democrat, is now outpacing on the
Speaker 2: g peace side by a massive amount. It looks as
Speaker 2: if the lead may be too big to rig. Is
Speaker 2: as they say, I don't know, we'll find out. But
Speaker 2: some people were actually hypothesizing that the advantage for Trump
Speaker 2: heading into election day may be so significant that election
Speaker 2: day voting probably won't even be capable of changing it.
Speaker 2: I find that very hard to believe. But that's what
Speaker 2: some of the some of the report I think was
Speaker 2: Mark Halper, and that was saying that this morning, so
Speaker 2: we'll find out. But yeah, you know, compared to Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris's meandering nonsense and the grating tone with which she speaks,
Speaker 2: Biden's kind of a Biden's kind of a breath of
Speaker 2: fresh air, isn't he just to have him come back
Speaker 2: out there? He just mumbling, murmuring, barely barely getting his
Speaker 2: sentences out and putting him putting them together. Not a joke, Jack,
Speaker 2: And it's like, it's obviously not a joke. It wasn't funny,
Speaker 2: so you don't have to say that, but it's not
Speaker 2: a joke, Jack, and then deadly serious and then he
Speaker 2: goes but like not like that though. It's like, so
Speaker 2: you mean it metaphorically, but it's not a joke. But anyways, Sayonara, Joe.
Speaker 2: They definitely kept your pasture expiration date, and it seems
Speaker 2: as if they put you out to pasture. Have a
Speaker 2: good one. Your career was a disaster for this country.
Speaker 2: But amazingly, I will still remember you more fondly than
Speaker 2: I will Kamala Harris at this point because she is
Speaker 2: just the bane of my existence. And the last bit
Speaker 2: of news before I get out of here is that
Speaker 2: Joe Rogan has confirmed, or at least his Twitter account,
Speaker 2: I don't know if it's actually Joe Joe Rogan podcast
Speaker 2: twitter account has confirmed that Donald Trump will be on
Speaker 2: The Joe Rogan Experience this Friday. So that is the
Speaker 2: twenty fifth big news. Because Joe had said in the
Speaker 2: past that he did not want to help Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: that he did not want to have him on his show.
Speaker 2: Apparently he has changed his mind. If you've been following
Speaker 2: Joe at all over the years, he has had on
Speaker 2: dissident political figures, but he has rarely had on people
Speaker 2: that went on to attain power, like he had on
Speaker 2: Bernie Sanders, he had on Telsea Gabbard, he voted for
Speaker 2: Ron Paul multiple times. So he seems to like the dissidents.
Speaker 2: He doesn't seem to like the mainstreamers. So the fact
Speaker 2: that he's having Rogan on is a pretty big deal personally.
Speaker 2: What I would like to see more than anything is
Speaker 2: if you're a fan of his, you've if you've been
Speaker 2: listening to Rogan, particularly through twenty twenty and twenty twenty one.
Speaker 2: He had on all of the experts that were shattering
Speaker 2: the narratives about the lockdown era. I want to see
Speaker 2: Rogan challenge Donald Trump on that topic. I personally think
Speaker 2: that Trump will handle it well because he handles pretty
Speaker 2: much everything well. But I think, more than anything, it
Speaker 2: would be good to have someone who did so much
Speaker 2: to highlight the depravity of that era, the de seat
Speaker 2: that we were living through in Rogan, who had all
Speaker 2: of the experts come through and just shatter the narrative
Speaker 2: left and right, which is why they went after Rogan
Speaker 2: hard during those years. If you remember, they tried to
Speaker 2: cancel him. He knows this stuff inside and out. You know,
Speaker 2: Joe likes to play as if he's some dummy, He's
Speaker 2: really not. He actually understands this stuff better than the
Speaker 2: average person by a large margin because he talks to
Speaker 2: all these experts for three hours at a clip. And
Speaker 2: I think he could challenge Donald Trump on that era
Speaker 2: and the legacy, his involvement, his legacy in that era,
Speaker 2: because Trump has consistently said I don't get enough credit.
Speaker 2: I don't get enough credit for you know, how we
Speaker 2: addressed that and blah, blah blah. Rogan could really rough
Speaker 2: him up in that arena, and I would like to
Speaker 2: see someone try to not because I think Trump can't
Speaker 2: handle it. I think he can, but I think that
Speaker 2: it's very important. It would be a healing moment actually
Speaker 2: for this country to have the guy who presided over
Speaker 2: one of the worst mistakes in my lifetime, if not
Speaker 2: the worst, certainly in domestic policy, it was the worst.
Speaker 2: Not saying he was responding for every decision, but let's
Speaker 2: be honest, he did allow it to go down under
Speaker 2: his watch. It would be great, It would be absolutely
Speaker 2: fantastic to have him challenge Trump on why didn't fire Fauci,
Speaker 2: Why didn't you know, why didn't you bring in outside
Speaker 2: information earlier? On why did you allow Fauci to get
Speaker 2: up there the entire summer of twenty twenty and lecture
Speaker 2: us about how we ought to be distancing and blah
Speaker 2: blah blah. Why didn't you bring an RFK junior. Then
Speaker 2: you had a chance to bring an RFK junior when
Speaker 2: you were first entering the White House. Why didn't that happen?
Speaker 2: Because the reports are that Bill Gates was responsible for
Speaker 2: basically doing an end round and getting him out of there?
Speaker 2: Is that true?
Speaker 4: You know?
Speaker 2: These are the things that Rogan knows about that he
Speaker 2: could really get to the bottom of and ask and
Speaker 2: demand answers. And I hope he does. And just to
Speaker 2: show him being even headed, I would love to see
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris on there too. I think it would be
Speaker 2: the funniest thing in the world to see Kamala Harris
Speaker 2: on the Durrogan experience. Can you imagine Kamala Harris trying
Speaker 2: to keep her shit together for three hours? Oh, it'd
Speaker 2: be harder than Joey Diaz not saying racial slurs. It's
Speaker 2: not possible. She couldn't do it. So that's my dream
Speaker 2: is that both Trump goes on there and joe go's
Speaker 2: hard on him. I think they're gonna have a great conversation.
Speaker 2: I'm sure it's gonna be fantastic. It probably won't be
Speaker 2: three hours. I hope it is. I really want them
Speaker 2: to go deep. But beyond that, Kamala Harris sign up.
Speaker 2: Your campaign is floundering. This is a Hail Mary, if
Speaker 2: ever there was one. You have a three hour opportunity
Speaker 2: to talk to ten million plus Americans, many of which
Speaker 2: are not planning to vote. For you, but you could
Speaker 2: persuade a whole hell of a lot of people if
Speaker 2: you do a good job. You're not gonna do a
Speaker 2: good job though, because you can't do it. But I
Speaker 2: would love to watch it. Plus would be great content
Speaker 2: for the show, and I'm sure you guys would love
Speaker 2: to hear a breakdown of it. So let's see. Let's
Speaker 2: see if it happens. There's only a few weeks left, Like,
Speaker 2: how many days is that? Eight? Thirteen days left? Twelve
Speaker 2: days left until the election? Crazy? So if she's gonna
Speaker 2: do it, she's got to do it next week. As always,
Speaker 2: this episode of Livery Lockdown is brought to you by
Speaker 2: Phoenix ammo dot com. If you were running low, the
Speaker 2: only place to go is Phoenix SAMO. I say it
Speaker 2: every week. If you aren't already getting your AMO from
Speaker 2: this company, you are fucking stupid man. Seriously, Phoenix Ammunition,
Speaker 2: it's fi nix. That's how you spell it, finix ammo
Speaker 2: dot com. You'd also follow them on x or Twitter
Speaker 2: at Phoenix Sammo. They are savages. They have a fantastic product.
Speaker 2: And if you don't have to enter a promo code
Speaker 2: because they already give you a discount when you order
Speaker 2: in bulk, and if you're a listener Liberty Lockdown, you're
Speaker 2: probably already buying book You Savage Phoenixammo dot com, get
Speaker 2: you some.
Speaker 1: One of the reasons why we take security very seriously,
Speaker 1: and it is why we have been working as hard
Speaker 1: as we can to make sure everything operates. It is
Speaker 1: that we were getting married and I'm having a child.
Speaker 1: This is uh, thank you very much, and this has
Speaker 1: been for some time.
Speaker 2: No, just not said anything. Shout out to Middlemega for
Speaker 2: the clip. The advantage doing this show tape delayed is
Speaker 2: that sometimes breaking news happens that totally debunks my opening
Speaker 2: SSAVO or largely does, and then gives us a nice
Speaker 2: little closing story. What a beautiful ending instead of shutting
Speaker 2: down Timcast dire El. Tim has decided to get married
Speaker 2: and apparently he's going to be a father to Boot.
Speaker 2: When I saw him in DC a couple of weeks ago,
Speaker 2: I noticed that Alison may have been showing. I didn't
Speaker 2: say anything because it wasn't like super obvious, But now
Speaker 2: I know that I was right that in fact, she
Speaker 2: was pregnant. So congrats to Tim. Congrats to the timcast
Speaker 2: crew that is still there. Apparently the firings are being
Speaker 2: handed out left and right, so I don't know who
Speaker 2: all has been cut and who all's going to stay on,
Speaker 2: but it does seem as if he took some of
Speaker 2: my advice and he's going to bring in some outside
Speaker 2: capital perhaps and have someone handle hiring and firing. But
Speaker 2: apparently a bunch of people are already being let go.
Speaker 2: So hopefully the operation can run smoothly from here on,
Speaker 2: and hopefully those people land on their feet, and hopefully
Speaker 2: he has many, many more kids, and so do I
Speaker 2: at some point, and so do you, and so does everybody,
Speaker 2: and let's just repopulate the earth while we're at it. Anyways,
Speaker 2: thank you guys so much for tuning in. If you
Speaker 2: enjoyed this episode, please do hit the like button shared
Speaker 2: around subscribe, comment down below if I got anything wrong,
Speaker 2: and h hugging. Kiss your mother because she's the best,
Speaker 2: because she brought you to me. See you so peace.
Speaker 2: Don't leave yet. I almost forgot this weekend October twenty
Speaker 2: fifth and twenty sixth. This is your last chance. Make
Speaker 2: sure if you are anywhere near here, you gotta come.
Speaker 2: It's gonna be so much fun, bro, Grove dot com.
Speaker 2: It's gonna be live podcast, stand up comedy, total Schizzo, conspiracy,
Speaker 2: theorist nonsense. It's gonna be so much fun, super brutal comedy.
Speaker 2: You're gonna love it. If you enjoy this show, if
Speaker 2: you've ever watched Tower Gang, you're gonna absolutely love this event.
Speaker 2: Obviously I'll be there. Liberty Lockdown. We got Tower Gang,
Speaker 2: we got Doughnut Shane Cashman's gonna come through. I didn't
Speaker 2: even realize that that's awesome. Cheney Dave of Isaac's Army,
Speaker 2: Revenge of the Cists, My guys, Joe see, she's awesome.
Speaker 2: And then Nephelum Death Squad we got one on one
Speaker 2: and Paranoid American and more are to be determined. And
Speaker 2: then the stand up comedy is the best Leonardo Jony
Speaker 2: and special guests. So it's gonna be really fun. It's
Speaker 2: not very expensive at all. If you're nearby, you gotta
Speaker 2: come through Brohemium Grove. Go to bro Grove dot com
Speaker 2: b r o Grove dot com to grab your tickets
Speaker 2: right away. We'll see you this weekend. Welcome to Liberty Lockdown.
Speaker 2: Let's got you block Home to Liberty. Ain't come but yeah,
Speaker 2: it's on home. It's where did it come from? And
Speaker 2: where did he go