Speaker 1: Welcome to an extra special edition of the Chicks on
the Right podcast. We have a very special guest with us,
and it's Mike Davis, who you may know from such
things as Article three project and being a complete badass
on X being on various shows you've also he also
has the ear of President Trump, who thinks, by the way,
that he is the meanest, toughest lawyer around. And we
know that you have to have an opinion about today's
Supreme Court ruling. So if you would for us lay
people break down what the ruling is and also how
much you want to straight up murder some of the
Supreme Court justices go.
Speaker 2: Well, politically murder. I don't need, yes, I don't need
the US Marshall showing up at my door. But I
would say President Yeah. President Trump says I'm the meanest,
most vicious lawyer out there, but he's never said I'm
the most handsome. So I need to circle back with
him and say, Hey, what the hell's going on here?
You say all these other people are handsome, This ginger
is not handsome. But anyway, so I always say I
have a face for radio, so I'm perfect with this
Supreme Court ruling. Let's just take a step back and
explain it to your audience. President Trump campaigned on the
fact that he is going to hire Elon Musk, He's
going to set up the Department of Government Efficiency or DOGE,
and he's going to lay waste to waste, fraud and
abuse in the federal government. And we just heard in
the State of the Union Address or the Joint Session
address last night by President Trump, there is a lot
of waste in the federal government. Did you know that
American American tax payers are funding transgender mice. I learned
that last night in this in the President's joint address.
And so President Trump is doing the unthinkable in Washington.
I remember, President Trump got three hundred and twelve electoral votes,
all seven swing states won the popular vote. The American
people liked what they heard and they gave President Trump
a broad electoral mandate. And President Trump is doing the unthinkable.
This is unthinkable in Washington, DC. He's actually doing what
he promised American voters he would do. He hired Elon Musk,
who works for the White House. He set up the
Department of Government Efficiency, which is part of the Executive
Office of the President. He took over Obama's Digital Services
Agency and turning at DOGE and they're actually going through
and finding waste broad and abuse. And in about six
weeks you see Elon Musk and his DOAGE team finding
hundreds of billions of dollars in waste brought and abuse.
And the American people, if you look at the pulling,
very much support what President Trump and Elon Musk are doing.
Why would you not, right? And so what's happening is
these these Democrat activist who run these non governmental entities,
these nonprofits that gets funded by the USAID and this
other government waste broaden abuse. They don't like the fact
that their gravy train has ended, right, and so they
are running to these activist judges, particularly Obama and Biden judges,
and in particular in Washington, DC, and they're getting They're
going in and oftentimes they're asking, they're going in in
the middle of the night. They're not even giving the
Trump Justice Department notice. They're doing this ex partey, and
they're going into these activist judges and getting temporary restraining
orders that in effect have a nationwide injunction and sabotage
the president. Remember what President Trump's doing here with this
waste broad abuse. He's exercising his core executive power under
Article two of the Constitution. He is the chief executive officer.
He is the commander in chief, and he as a
constitutional duty, not just a right, a duty to take
care that our laws are faithfully executed. And that means
at a minimum, making sure that there's not waste brought
an abuse and these appropriations by Congress. And we're not
seeing President Trump steal Congress's legislative power under Article one.
He's not trying to rewrite laws or right laws. President
Trump is not trying to steal the Supreme Court's judicial
power under Article threes, not trying to decide cases are controversies.
He is exercising core Article to powers. And when these plaintiffs,
these left wing plaintiffs, go to these activist judges, they
are sabotaging the president and fulfilling his not only constitutional right,
but constitutional duty. It's his duty to take care that
the laws are faithfully executed.
Speaker 1: And so they are Roberts and amy Cony Barrett then
decide that one judge who voted this way to like to,
you know, to stop the freeze.
Speaker 3: How do what were they thinking?
Speaker 4: Yeah, because it's because it's because they're essentially sabotaging the
American people too.
Speaker 3: I mean, that's that's how I feel about it.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And our money, because it's our money. It's our freaking money.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a very good question. There were there were
four conservative justices, the four men as I call them,
on the Supreme Court wrote a powerful descent with Alido
and Justice Thomas, the greatest justice of all time, and
then Justice Gorsich, my former boss, the second greatest justice
of all time, of course, and then Justice Capital. And
so you have the five ladies on the Supreme Court.
You have Chief Justice John Roberts, and then the four
heads and they they they actually wrote an opinion that
remember who this judge is. This judge is a new
Obama judge who barely got confirmed. He's a dual citizen.
He is this uh he brags about how he's the
first Muslim and first Arab judge on the DC federal bench.
And he is a dual citizen. To this day, he
is still a Canadian citizen along with an American citizen.
I'm not quite sure how that works if you have
dual loyalties as a lifetime appointed judge to the DC
federal bench or any federal bench. But he is a
left wing radical, and he basically sabotaged the President of
the United States when the President wanted to pause USAID
funding to make sure, for example, we're not funding transgender
mice in Mozambique, or we're not funding Hamas terrorist in
Gaza who are killing Israelis and American citizens. And that's
the President's duty under Article two as commander in chief,
as the chief executive officer, under his duty to take care.
And it's frankly shocking to me that the Chief Justice,
along with Amy Cody Barrett, cited with the liberals on
this case. I mean, the Chief Justice plays a game,
and I like him personally. I clerked for Justice Cours,
which I like him personally. I don't know Barrett's she
came after I left, even though I played a big
role in selling her nomination and getting her confirmed from
the Article three project, she's certainly the biggest disappointment I've seen.
But I think she's a rattled law professor with her
head up rass as I've said, and you know, maybe maybe,
just maybe she's overwhelmed. You know, she has like seventy
five kids, and maybe she's just overwhelmed, and you know,
maybe she's and maybe she.
Speaker 3: Hates maybe she just hates Trump. Maybe she hasn't.
Speaker 2: And I think, well, I think the bigger problem is
is if you look at the reporting, is is she
hates Justice Alito, which is unfortunate. And I would say
to these justices, we we want justices who use their
brains and use reason instead of emotion. Right, maybe we
need to think about that before before we put more
hints on the Supreme Court.
Speaker 3: Right, and then what happened, Like is there anything that
can happen? What happens next?
Speaker 1: Because this is like people hear this is the Supreme
Court ruling and they think, okay, well that's the end now.
Speaker 2: So this is what the this is what this was
on the emergency docket. And the Chief Justice plays his
little game right it's uh, it's it's called chief ye right,
where he thinks that instead of just following the law
and letting the chips fall where they're where they may,
they have lifetime tenure, they have pay protection, the chief
uh plays it. He gets chief He thinks he can
split the baby ends that he can help the Supreme
Court avoid the political fallouts if he's chief and he
splits the baby and he you know, acts like he's
the Speaker of the House, and he you know, he
or Oprah Winfrey. He gives a car to someone and
then he gives a car to another way. He he,
he plays this chiefy game, and instead of depoliticizing the
Supreme Court, it actually makes the Supreme Court more political,
right and then, and so that's what I think happened here.
I think that you have a Supreme Court justice in
John Roberts who thinks he's protecting the Supreme Court from politics,
and he he tried to split the baby with this
ruling and tried to say, well, you know, let's give
this radical Muslim Canadian citizen judge on the DC District
Court who barely got confirmed, who I think is a
trojan horse for tried to destroy our country, is a
Marxist trojan horse, like a lot of these Biden judges.
And so let's just send it back to Judge Allie
or whatever the hell his name is, not Smith, not Davis,
Judge Allie, We're going to send it back to this
Muslim judge, and you know he's gonna he's going to
do a little bit more of a careful analysis to
figure out whether he can fund the Muslim Brotherhood or
not that you know, this judge, this activist judge, is
going to decide whether the President of the United States
can cut off funding to the Muslim Brotherhood, and then
maybe we'll come back up through the process. Here's the
bottom line, as Justice Alito put in his descent, the
Chief Justice and these four hens on the Supreme Court
essentially just gave away two billion dollars that we're not
going to get back. And it's probably a lot of
this is going to fund, of course, you know they're
going to fund, you know, the left wing interest in DC.
Maybe a USA i D is essentially the travel agent
and party planner overseas party planner for the for the
DC elite, and so that will continue at USA I D.
They're also going to probably fund a lot of stuff
that the American people don't want funded. And it's it's
a disgrace.
Speaker 4: There's nothing that can happen, and and well this is
and this, and it drives me insane because we were
so far from what the founders wanted.
Speaker 3: And these are the this is the Supreme Court This
is what it.
Speaker 4: Drives me, saying, just as I'm a nobody citizen, right
and I'm looking at this, and I'm like, they're supposed
to know everything there is to know about the Constitution
and our laws, and you know, I don't know as
much as these people know. But I know that we're
thirty plus trillion dollars in debt. So when Trump says, hey,
we should stop, you know, for aid, maybe just halt
that for a while. If I was looking at my
personal budget, I'd be like, hey, maybe we should stop
this stuff, and we should, and I would know that
it would be right to stop it because we're so
much in debt. If it were a personal budget, this
is the right thing to do. And then you have
the Supreme Court going, no, we're gonna go ahead and
spend the money anyway.
Speaker 3: We're broke. Yeah we can't.
Speaker 2: Well, that's exactly right. I would say this. The Federal
judiciaries budget is nine point four billion dollars in FY
twenty twenty five, fiscal year twenty twenty five. I'm going
to push cars and I'm very serious about this. I
just posted this on X Now that the Supreme Court
has refused to rein in these activist judges who are
sabotaging the President of the United States, who just got
elected with a in a landslide with electoral mandate. They're
going to If these dual citizen Muslim judges in DC
are going to sabotage the President of the United States,
it's time for the Article three projects to work with
Congress to reign in these activist judges, particularly the DC
District Court. So I'm going to work very closely with
my friends and former colleagues on the Senate Judiciary Committee.
We're going to draft legislation that reigns in these activist
judges because this is unacceptable. The Chief Justice, John Roberts
is the circuit executive for the DC Circuit, so that
includes the DC District Court, and he failed to do
his job. He failed to do his job. He led
activist judges sabotage the President of the United States, exercising
his core Article to commander in Chief and Chief Executive
officer powers. And Amy Cony Barrett, as I've said, is
this rattle law professor with her head up rass. She's overwhelmed,
Like I said, she has seventy five kids. She's not
up to the job and it's an embarrassment. She's the biggest.
She is an embarrassment.
Speaker 1: Ye said, Now, do you feel genuine optimism about what
you just said you're doing? I mean, is it possible
to get this money back and to actually turn this
this ruling around because it is such a betrayal to America.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it is. And the problem is, So what's going
to happen is I'm going to push very hard, Like
I said, the judiciary what is at nine point four
billion dollars. So I'm going to push very hard for
two billion dollars to come out of the Federal Judiciary's
budget to cover for the two billion dollars that Judge
Ali the Canadian Muslim is going to send to the
Muslim Brotherhood overseas and transgender mice and the Chief Justice
and Amy Cody Barrett. Let that happen. So we're going
to take a We're going to take a run at
the federal Judiciary's budget. They have too much money. Obviously,
when they're going after every Trump Grandma on January sixth
and throwing them at prison, it's obvious that the federal
judiciary has too much money, particularly the DC District Court,
and I'm looking at the DC District Court is the
most out of control court in the federal judiciary because
you have a bunch of Obama and Biden radical Marxist
and then you have a bunch of Trump pussies, right,
So that's the DC District Court. So the Trump pussies
will always figure out a way to get it wrong,
like they'll overthink things because they think they're really smart.
So the Trump pussies will go along with the Obama
and Biden Marxist and so what I think needs to
happen after the DC District Court spent four years persecuting, yes,
persecuting Trump supporters. On January sixth, as the Supreme Court
clearly held in the Fisher decision, they have too much
time on their hands. They're too big, they have too
much of a budget. And I'm looking I split my
time between DC and Colorado. When I go back to
d C. I've noticed that DC's street crimes have gone
up substantially, like drive by shootings in front of my house.
Now they're not shooting at me because I have guns
and I'll shoot back, but they there have been there
have been carjackings and violent crimes Ed Martin's doing a
good job of cleaning that up the DC US Attorney.
But what I think needs to happen right now, DC
street crimes go to the DC Superior Court, which is
not an Article three court, and it's I think unconstitutional
because the leftist in d C pick their leftist judges
for the DC Superior Court and they let crime run rampant,
right And so what I think needs to happen is
part of these reforms that the Article three Project's going
to push through Congress is we're going to take two
billion dollars out of the federal judiciaries budget next year
to cover for the USAID funding that Muslim judge Canadian
judge sets overseas. And then we're going to look at
getting rid of the DC Superior Court. There are like
ten vacancies. Why the hell do we want to fill those.
Let's just get rid of the court, and then let's
make these d C District Court judges, these Article three
judges who have nothing to do now that they can't
persecute Trump Grandma's for the last four years. Now they
want to sabotage the president's Article two power for the
next four years. So what we need to do is
tell these DC District courts judges, you guys aren't doing
that anymore. You guys are going to focus on DC
street crimes. You're going to go after You're gonna make
DC safe again, right, and then we're going to do
a random assignment of judges around the country to come
in and do non DC street crimes. And so if
there is a case that has a national implication or
a federal implication, we're going to randomly draw judges from
across America so we don't we're not stuck with these
Obama and Biden, radical Marxists and Trump pussy judges in
the DC district.
Speaker 1: Point yes, indeed, right, all right, We've got to find
out your reaction to the State of the Union. I
know people are like, it's not a State of the Union,
it's a presidential whatever the Joint made to the Joint
Houses of Congress.
Speaker 3: What was your reaction?
Speaker 2: I mean it was it was a grand slam by
President Trump. It was the best presidential speech I have
ever heard. The best president I mean not just State
of the Union or Joint Joint Session address. It was
the best presidential speech I've ever heard. President Trump. Look
This is what I always say about President Trump. He
came in in twenty sixteen, he had never run for office,
he had never been in office, and he even admits
that he made mistakes in his first term, particularly on personnel.
And this is President Trump. This is not a guy
who admits mistakes very often, but he even recognizes that
he made mistakes on personnel. He had four years in
office the last time. He got a lot of stuff
done right. But he was so disruptive that I don't
think the country was ready for him politically right. Their
head wasn't repped or wrapped around the fact that we
needed a president like the o' donald Trump to break
up the DC unipart right. And so he had four
years in office with terrible staff who, like Trump, did
it largely on his own, including transformed the federal judiciary.
Amy Barrett, the rattleball professor with her head up or
ass was one of his mistakes. We're not going to
make that mistake this time. And so then he had
four years in the wilderness where he he had the
election stolen in twenty twenty and I firmly believe the
election was stolen, and I'll stand by that forever. So
he had four years after his election was stolen in
twenty twenty, and he faced unprecedented republicanding lawfair. The Article
three project turned lemons into leiminatee. We turned this lawfare
against the Democrats. Now, President Trump, what did we do?
Forty five hundred media hits, constant social media, constant opinion pieces.
We turned espionage into Democrat lawfair, and we kicked their
asses on November fifth on that issue. Now President Trump
is back and he's not making the mistakes he made
the first time again. Four years in office, four years
in the wilderness. He is ready to govern on day one.
He has the right people in place. Susie Wiles is
a stone cold killer. I have the greatest respect. I
have the greatest respect for her as the White House
Chief of staffed. She is no bullshit, right, she no drama,
no bullshit. And I've been around President Trump and Susie
Wills and President Trump. He greatly respects her. And that's
the dirty secret. I want your audience to know President Trump.
People think that he's a misogynist asshole, and sure, yeah yeah,
I mean he made like his models and that's whatever.
That's President Trumps he's a he's a dude. He can't
help it, right, a billionaire i'd be banging models to
if so anyway, But so I would say this about
President Trump. He actually remember look back, look back. His
in his career in New York in the construction industry, right,
the construction business. He had the first female construction executives
in New York City, right, He's that was back in
the nineties when no one had female executives anywhere, particularly
in the construction industry. With President Trump, he doesn't like
chiefs of staff or staffers who men who are too
weak like Rand's previous sorry rants, or too strong like
General Kelly. Right. And so you have to be the
right person if you're a man, to work around Trump,
because Trump's too epha, He's gonna butt heads with you.
Can you?
Speaker 1: I'm curious just along those lines, can Susie? And can you?
Because I know you've got a zero sometimes too? Are
you guys able to criticize him or criticize his actions
or his behavior or like, what is that dynamic?
Speaker 3: Is he open to hearing when you guys don't agree with.
Speaker 1: Something he's doing.
Speaker 2: I'll speak for myself. I've had many conversations with President
Trump over the last since the moral lago rate. That's
really when I start. When I became very close to
him because I was the only one defending him, right.
And so I've become very close with President Trump, and
I like and respect him a lot, and I tell him,
here's the deal. This is what I tell President Trump.
You like me now because I'm not on your payroll. Right.
The second I go on your payroll, You're going to
hate me. Right. So that's why I'm not working for it, right,
because he he likes and respects me now because I'm
not working for him. And if I were his attorney
general or his White House counsel or any other job,
he would hate me, right, he said he would make
an exception for me. But so at least he realizes
that the second I go on his payroll, he would
hate me. But yeah, I tell him constantly. I give
him my direct and candid thoughts constantly, and you know,
sometimes he gets pissed, but I don't care. I's he's
not paying me. I'm not working for him. I'm doing
this as a volunteer and my only goal at the
Article three project is to make sure that he succeeds
as the president of the United States because I think
President Trump, I'm not a terribly religious person, but I
think that assassination attempt totally showed that that God has
a plan for President Trump, our country in the world.
Speaker 4: Right, And don't you think that that President Trump two
point zero is so much better because of all the
things the Democrats try to do to him, and because
of the law there, because of the assassination attempt, because
of just the beatings that this guy has taken over
the past nine years.
Speaker 3: They did this.
Speaker 4: They crafted him into They molded him into a guy
that is Listen, he was great before. He was great
the first time. And we were old enough to remember
him from the eighties and nineties, right when.
Speaker 3: He was when everybody liked him.
Speaker 4: But everybody yeah, and everybody like revered him as this
great guy. But but they have molded him into Trump
two point zero, who is exponentially even better than the
first you know, iteration of Trump who was great.
Speaker 3: So they did this, they did it. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Look, I have known since the assassination attempts, the first
one in Pennsylvania, I have noticed a dramatic change in
President Trump's mindset. I really do think he was touched.
Speaker 3: By God and demeanor.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he's he understands that he has a very important mission,
and that is to save America. Otherwise our entire world
is fucked, right, Yeah, Oh totally. If America fails, the
whole world fails. And we have these subversive leftist elements
in America like this Canadian Muslim judge in DC, who
are working every day. They're evil, they're working every second
of every day to destroy our country from me.
Speaker 4: And don't you think that if we and don't you
think that if we don't do it, because we've talked
about this a lot on our show, if it doesn't
happen now, then we really are fucked.
Speaker 3: Because like if it like this is it.
Speaker 4: If it doesn't happen, if these changes don't happen, if
we don't get the budget under control, like our economy,
everything just our culture in general, if we don't get
it all under control over the next you know, three
and a half years, then there's no turning back, and
there's no place else to go. I mean, we are
the beacon on the hill, and so this is it.
This is the turning point. That's why when he says
it's the Golden age. I believe that this has to
be the golden age.
Speaker 2: For US President Biden, and I don't. I think he's
just such a moron, just a dementit more. And I
can he actually understood what was happening, but he had
very radical Marxist working for him, and they worked every
second of the last four years destroying our country. They
opened our border and let in over fifteen million unvetteds
and unvetable illegal immigrants from the worst trouble spots around
the world. The Third World marks as tolls, particularly and
I'm gonna say this, and I don't give a shit,
particularly from the Muslim world, where they want to come here.
They're not here to assimilate. They are here to destroy us.
Speaker 3: It's the same, right, But they're not.
Speaker 2: Here because they want to become Americans and they love
our culture. They are here like they're doing in Europe.
They hate Europe, they hate the West, they hate Christianity,
they hate Judaism. They are here to destroy and we
see that with that DC District judge, Judge Muslimli the
Canadian right, this is what they're doing. They are trying
to destroy our country. And President Trump understands that, and
he doesn't give a shit if he gets criticized for it.
He is a billionaire, he has a better house, he
has better houses, he has better cars, he has better airplane,
he has better helicopter, he has a better everything. Doesn't
need this shit, right, and he is going back to
the White House. I remember after the marl Lago rate like,
I went and talked to him, I went and had
dinner with him, and I said, you can. You have
to fight this because you are the only person on
this planet who has the balls and the courage to
to fight this. And if if, if, if it's going
to be some typical Republican cock as our Republican nominee,
they're just going to manage our nation's decline. That's what
the Republican Party has become. They are. They are just
the janitors for the for the nation's decline. And President
Trump is different. He actually has the world experience, the business,
business experience, the government experience as the former president. He
is the only person right now who can who can
do the impossible job of saving our country from this
decline under Obama and on steroids under Biden.
Speaker 4: Yeah, because you look at my god, you look at
like the Nicole Wallace's of the world, who you to
work for Bush?
Speaker 2: She's such a fucking she is such a fucking twit.
I worked with her in the bushboardy three white House.
She is the dumbest motherfucker in the Bush forty three
white House. And that that says a lot, because they
were a lot of dumb people in that white house.
She is so dumb, she is so dopey. It's amazing
to me that you can have someone who's borderline mentally
retarded as an anker of at MSNBC.
Speaker 4: And did you see her like her response to that
precious little that precious boy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the thirteen year old boy who's who's fighting brain
cancer and Nicole Wallace is such a fucking bitch, was like, oh,
forget about this thirteen year old boy. I just I
just have this. I just have this hatred for Trump
that I can't control. If that means, if that means
fuck this thirteen year old boy and throw them overboard,
that's what Nicole Wallace is gonna say. What a dumb
what a dumb, dopey bitch.
Speaker 3: I just her and her and Rachel Rachel mad out.
Speaker 2: You watched them, it was I'm gonna get in so
much troum. My press team said, I couldn't say this,
but it was like watching it was like watching a
losing women's softball team last night. When you were looking
at the Democrats, just a bunch of angry just angry women, right,
and sign women with tattoos and rolled up in their
key shirts. Right, it just looks so angry. It was
so great.
Speaker 4: The signs were like a gift to the g O P.
Like I swear in our social media, I mean I
had like who was it it was? Was it Jiapaul
who had the sign? And I swear it was superimposed?
Was like I farted on there. I mean like it
was the gift that kept on giving with all.
Speaker 2: The last night that that watching the Democrats last night,
it was like, this is exactly why number one, we
need to stop illegal immigration because we're bringing in these
third world Marxist dumpy people, right. And then we need
to end DEI because no other place in the world
with these women and minorities be anywhere close to power.
But because of DEI, they get demoted to power. They're sitting,
they're sitting on the floor of the House of Representatives
with the President of the United States with their weird
signs and their angry face. It's just we need, we
need to get serious as a country about meritocracy and
closing our borders.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and just and just the fact that you can't.
I mean, let's there are certain things that all of
us as human beings, just as collective humanity can be
happy about a kid that has overcome cancer. You think
that we could all stand up and clap for that.
Speaker 2: But no.
Speaker 3: But yet you tell them, hey, we're gonna get more
money to Ukraine, and they're.
Speaker 2: Like, oh yeah, or trans mice, We're gonna you know
what we have Cody Barrett and John Roberts. Let the
Muslim Canadian judge send more money to trans transmice and
fucking Boseyannebica wherever the money is going. What is it?
Speaker 3: What even is that? Is that a mouse of lipstick on?
Speaker 2: What is that?
Speaker 3: I don't even like, how do you know that a
mouse is trans I don't. Somebody has to explain that
to me because.
Speaker 2: Because because the mouse, because the mouse has its pronouns
written on its little mouse collar, it.
Speaker 3: Is okay.
Speaker 1: Spectrum.
Speaker 3: It's what is our world?
Speaker 2: What is it?
Speaker 1: I don't know. Well, Mike, we're at the thirty minute mark.
We know your time is limited and you're very busy
with us.
Speaker 3: It's very important, Mike, You're very important.
Speaker 2: Let me say this to end this thing we talk
about de Ei. I want to say that the people
I respect the most in this world are conservative women
and minorities because they have to take so much shit
from the Left because they're conservative women and minorities. So
people like you, ladies, Clarence Thomas, my favorite American that
the left has taken. They exploit women in minorities to
push their Mike Marxist bullshit, and I just want to
praise conservative women like you who have the balls. Yes,
you have bigger balls than most Republican men to be
out there in the fight. You guys have giant brass balls,
and I really appreciate it.
Speaker 3: Well, thank you mine.
Speaker 1: Where can people find you?
Speaker 2: Article three Project dot org. And after today's interview, I
might go to the I might get said to the
gulag somewhere. So article three Project dot org. Article number
three Project dot org. You can follow us on social media.
You can donate, but don't do not donate more than
you can afford. No, I'll spend my own money if
I have to. And then the most important thing your
audience can do is take action. Action, action, action. Light
up your members of Congress, light up your elected officials elsewhere.
That is the most powerful powerful thing we do at
the Article three product that in vote yes.
Speaker 3: Totally great advice. Thank you, Mike, thank you well, Thank
you
Speaker 2: M HM.