Speaker 1: By Billy Cunningham.
Speaker 2: The Great America, Welcome to this war is Tuesday afternoon
Speaker 2: in the tri State and guess what more zero degree temperatures.
Speaker 2: I guess more global warming is coming. And also later
Speaker 2: in the weekend might get up to forty degrees and
Speaker 2: that's wonderful forty degrees. Think about that with rain than snow,
Speaker 2: of course, But what's happening in California? To watch the
Speaker 2: media presentation of both, I must live in some alternative universe.
Speaker 2: If it's Al Roker this morning on the Today Show,
Speaker 2: or if it's watching Rachel Maddow that, thank god, she
Speaker 2: has five nights a week to make a fool of
Speaker 2: herself instead of only one. We have two ways of
Speaker 2: looking at the same set of facts. Liberals democrats say,
Speaker 2: you know what, global warming, global warming, global warming, climate change,
Speaker 2: climate change, and reasonable conservatives and I wait a minute,
Speaker 2: what about the underbrush? What about no water? What about
Speaker 2: the industrialization of California? What about those things? What about
Speaker 2: putting a large city in a grass land in a
Speaker 2: death Might you have some problems? On the other hand,
Speaker 2: we have Steve Maloy of junk Scize dot com junk
Speaker 2: science dot Com, written many books on the subject about
Speaker 2: climate change and more. And Steve malloy, Welcome again to
Speaker 2: the Bill Cunningham Show. And Steve, how are you.
Speaker 3: I'm doing great, Bill, thanks for having me.
Speaker 1: Happy New Year, Happy new to you and yours.
Speaker 2: And the fires in California are now almost out of control.
Speaker 2: At the city of Angels was built in a grassland
Speaker 2: in a desert, and it flowers and flourishes because of
Speaker 2: the industrialization of the West and things of that character.
Speaker 2: But talk to me about what you see about climate change,
Speaker 2: which means global warming is causing all these fires and
Speaker 2: not human activity of any type. Not the failures of
Speaker 2: Gavin Newsom. I kind of call him Nero Newsom, Nero
Speaker 2: Newsom him. And also Karen Bass, the first name is
Speaker 2: appropriate to her. She's a Karen Bass. And she promised
Speaker 2: never again to travel outside the country, having spent seventeen
Speaker 2: trips to Castro's Cuba Communism when she was in Congress.
Speaker 2: She's traveling still all over the world. But is it
Speaker 2: man made climate change?
Speaker 1: Or is it?
Speaker 2: Or is it climate change? Is man activity? Give the
Speaker 2: American people a full report.
Speaker 3: Well, let me just say that every weekend I found
Speaker 3: an article from the Anaheim Californian Gazette from October thirty first,
Speaker 3: eighteen seventy five. Okay, so one hundred and fifty years ago.
Speaker 3: And in that article they complained about out of control brush,
Speaker 3: flammable buildings, what they call the useless fire Department, and
Speaker 3: the Santa Ana Wins. And the point of that is
Speaker 3: that this part of California has always faced all these
Speaker 3: things that we have today, except of course today it's
Speaker 3: much worse. We have many more flammable buildings, much more brush,
Speaker 3: because nature is not allowed to you know, if we
Speaker 3: don't don't, we don't do control burns anymore, burn the
Speaker 3: brush or manage the brush. So everything is worse today.
Speaker 3: So this is not a surprise. In Los Ange Angels area,
Speaker 3: there's no global warming going on. Even at Los Angeles Airport,
Speaker 3: which should have urban heat out on effect, there's no
Speaker 3: warming going on. Since eighteen ninety five. Precipitation in California
Speaker 3: is basically flats, not not changed at all. So, you know,
Speaker 3: this is just what happens when you don't manage the brush,
Speaker 3: you get a spark, you know, spark either by accident
Speaker 3: or arson, and then the sant Ana Wins come through
Speaker 3: and it's all gone up. It's got nothing to do
Speaker 3: with climate, It's got everything to do with bad government.
Speaker 3: In this case, the government not only did they not
Speaker 3: take care of the brush, not you know, have an
Speaker 3: inadequate fire hydrant system. Imagine you've got a twenty million
Speaker 3: dollar house in California, you got a fire hyder down front.
Speaker 3: It doesn't work, and you're thinking it does. Right.
Speaker 2: I don't want to laugh at this, I don't want
Speaker 2: to lay its serious to those people.
Speaker 3: Well, no, but it matters. And so the government, you know,
Speaker 3: issued a lame warning almost two weeks ago, now that
Speaker 3: you know this wind event was going to come and
Speaker 3: that life threatening winds and fire could happen. Apparently no
Speaker 3: one paid attention. I mean, Karen Basswo went off at Ghana,
Speaker 3: she didn't care. Gaven Newsom didn't do anything. You know,
Speaker 3: people went to bed Tuesday evening thinking everything was fine.
Speaker 3: They were woking at five o'clock in the morning and
Speaker 3: buy firefighters and get the hell out of here. So, yeah,
Speaker 3: this is a man made This is bad government, man
Speaker 3: made disasters. Democrats own this and now and now they
Speaker 3: want us taxpayers to be on the hook. This is
Speaker 3: the cost here could be two hundred and fifty to
Speaker 3: two hundred and seventy five billion dollars. That's a lot
Speaker 3: of money.
Speaker 2: A lot of the fires are ongoing as I speak,
Speaker 2: and let's say that to us yet and we lawyers
Speaker 2: are looking many times like piranha when you have a
Speaker 2: fresh pig in the stream and they're circling. Lawsuits have
Speaker 2: already been filed. Some of the ignition sources, allegedly are fireworks,
Speaker 2: homeless itinerants from Mexico with blow torches and or lightning
Speaker 2: strikes and or electrical grid. They're suing everyone one in
Speaker 2: order to find a hant a pocket to put their
Speaker 2: hand into. This is jumping ahead a little bit, but
Speaker 2: this will be litigated for years to come, whether it
Speaker 2: was fireworks, or whether it was legal immigrants with blowtorches,
Speaker 2: or whether it was some other factor. The lawyers are
Speaker 2: going to have a field day in California, which is
Speaker 2: very plant off oriented anyway. So before we get onto
Speaker 2: that issue, I want to talk about the lack of water.
Speaker 2: Can you address yourself to the fact that the dams.
Speaker 2: I watched a video of a Nero Newsome about four
Speaker 2: years ago complimenting himself by destroying three dams in order
Speaker 2: to provide better habitat for the schmelt fish to pond
Speaker 2: to spawn. I'm thinking, what the hell is spawning for
Speaker 2: a fish. I guess that's how you reproduce if you're
Speaker 2: a fish. But he's blowing up the dams allowing nature
Speaker 2: to return to California. But you have one hundred thousand
Speaker 2: houses out of the fuel. Actually, the houses are the
Speaker 2: fuel for the firestorms, which is natural.
Speaker 1: Explain that to the American people.
Speaker 3: Well, I think the dam destruction was on the Klamath River,
Speaker 3: which I'm not quite sure that would have all that
Speaker 3: much effect. But you're right about the water to save
Speaker 3: the delta smell, which is a tiny two inch fish
Speaker 3: in the Sacramento River San Joaquin Valley basin there to
Speaker 3: save that fish, the environmentalists call them endangered. And because
Speaker 3: of that one hundred billion gallons of water per year,
Speaker 3: and the billion is important. Trump has talked about, you know,
Speaker 3: millions of gallons of water being flushed into the Pacific.
Speaker 3: It's one hundred billion gallons that are diverted from the
Speaker 3: San Joaquin Valley and southern California to save this fish,
Speaker 3: and that water gets dumped into the Pacific Ocean. So now,
Speaker 3: and that's only part of the water problem. I mean
Speaker 3: another part of the water problem is in you know,
Speaker 3: ten years ago California voters voted to have more reservoirs built.
Speaker 3: Gavin Newsom has built none of them. And then you
Speaker 3: come to the fire hydrants where you know, for this
Speaker 3: whole area, you know, thousands of acres, tens of thousands
Speaker 3: of acres that got three one million gallon tanks of water.
Speaker 3: Sounds like a lot, but it's not really. And of
Speaker 3: course they couldn't refill those tanks fast enough as they
Speaker 3: were pumping it out, so the whole thing was just
Speaker 3: ripe for disaster. And it's going back to the you know,
Speaker 3: if I'm in the Palisades and I've got a fire
Speaker 3: hydrant in front of my house, I'm thinking that's going
Speaker 3: to work, that's gonna save me. The government is telling
Speaker 3: me I'm safe if I having that fire hydrant there.
Speaker 3: But of course there's no water. You know, people relied
Speaker 3: on the government and to their detriment.
Speaker 2: Well, they're not spending money on irrigation, they're not spending
Speaker 2: money on water storage, they're not spending money on fire prevention,
Speaker 2: they're not spending money on forest management. They're not spending
Speaker 2: money on a viable insurance industry, but they're spending money
Speaker 2: on DEI I watched the other night the woman who
Speaker 2: appears to be about thirty five year old, a person
Speaker 2: of color, female, out of the Stanford University Women's Studies department,
Speaker 2: and she's making seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year.
Speaker 2: I can only imagine what her pension's going to look like.
Speaker 2: And she gave this speech at some the conference, and
Speaker 2: what she said, my main mission is to diversify the
Speaker 2: water management and state of California and in the County
Speaker 2: of Los Angeles. Then we have to bring equity and
Speaker 2: inclusion to water resources.
Speaker 1: What the hell does that mean?
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, no, you know California local officials are famously overpaid.
Speaker 3: Not surprised. Well, they've got DEEI and the fire apartment,
Speaker 3: fire department too. Yeah, and the fire department. They have
Speaker 3: all these projects to clean up the brush in the
Speaker 3: Palisades and that whole area where the fires are. None
Speaker 3: of them have been even started. I mean these were
Speaker 3: approved four years ago. Uh, they've made zero percent progress
Speaker 3: on any of them. I mean, you know, the focus
Speaker 3: in California for too long. We have hit teaky at idiocy,
Speaker 3: are not paying the price for it. Focus in California
Speaker 3: for too long, it's just been politics not making things work.
Speaker 3: And you know these fires, we've had the warnings. I mean,
Speaker 3: we've had fires all over California and everyone knows it's
Speaker 3: because of land mismanagement, government lists. You know, all these
Speaker 3: fires start on public lands and will start in private lands.
Speaker 3: Are on public lands, and then they spread the private
Speaker 3: lands and no one had done anything. Trump flew to
Speaker 3: California six years ago to lecture Gavenous and mon you know,
Speaker 3: cleaning up the brush, cleaning up the forest. Did you listen.
Speaker 2: No, No, let's talk about electric vehicles, because no one
Speaker 2: is better on this topic than Steve Maloy. I live
Speaker 2: in the little city of Cincinnati, and there's going to
Speaker 2: be now by the way, the snowplows aren't working. Thirty
Speaker 2: percent are not being used because they put something called
Speaker 2: obstacles on the roads in Cincinnati, which happens in many
Speaker 2: other cities. They're called speed bumps because the mayor or
Speaker 2: liberal mayor doesn't want people pulled over for not having
Speaker 2: for speeding or driver's license violation or no insurance, so
Speaker 2: we got speed bumps everywhere. So that means that when
Speaker 2: the snow plows get to work, they're snapping off the
Speaker 2: plows in the front and thirty percent aren't working. So
Speaker 2: the solution, Steve Maloy, is electric snow plows. They're now
Speaker 2: debating whether there's spend millions and millions of dollars in
Speaker 2: buying a new fleet of electric snow plows Sinnati, which,
Speaker 2: by the way, the electric the evs don't work real
Speaker 2: well when it's zero, but that's a different issue. Explain
Speaker 2: the idiocy. You know, there's this movie called Dumb and Dumber,
Speaker 2: one of my favorite movies. Just when I think you
Speaker 2: could not do anything more stupid, you do something like
Speaker 2: this and totally redeem yourself. City council they want to
Speaker 2: have electric snowplows along with electric school buses.
Speaker 1: Explain the fantasy of that.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure how electric snowplows, how the blades for
Speaker 3: electric snowplows wouldn't break off over speed bumps, But well,
Speaker 3: of course, you know cold weather snow, that's the worst
Speaker 3: time to have an electric vehicle, right the battery will drain.
Speaker 3: It's just it's not worth it as matter of fact,
Speaker 3: I think the blades will be worse off because the
Speaker 3: batteries and those trucks are going to be heavier. Oh
Speaker 3: my god, it's just going to be disaster. And you know,
Speaker 3: I'm sure that the buses will cost twice as much.
Speaker 3: The snowplows probably cost twice as much too. It's just
Speaker 3: a waste of money. I mean, we have terrible government
Speaker 3: all around. I'm not quite sure who's to blame. The
Speaker 3: Conservatives that's work, you know, to shut their eyes and
Speaker 3: kind of laugh about it and try to make it
Speaker 3: by or you know, the Democrats to just vote for
Speaker 3: this stuff because wow, it just sounds great.
Speaker 2: It's kind of like a white, great white shark eating
Speaker 2: a tuna. Their eyes roll back on their head and
Speaker 2: they get all excited about electric vehicles and I saw
Speaker 2: this one. Maybe you know more about these hydrogen vehicles.
Speaker 2: There are many there's a thought by Toyota and many
Speaker 2: others that hydrogen vehicles is the future, and or these
Speaker 2: suitcase nuclear power plants that may be apple to put
Speaker 2: together so by the time the country is electrified properly
Speaker 2: with evs, we'll move on to some other technology. Is
Speaker 2: the future hydrogen or is the future continued continuing to
Speaker 2: be for the next twenty years of oil and gas.
Speaker 3: Yeah, hydrogen is a disaster. They've tried it out in California.
Speaker 3: Even in California, they can't make it work. The future
Speaker 3: is oil and gas, There's no question about it. There's
Speaker 3: no comparable technology on the horizon. These you know, suitcase
Speaker 3: they're more like dumpster nuclear power plants you're talking about.
Speaker 3: It's probably good technology, but of course, I don't know
Speaker 3: how many communities are going to want one of those
Speaker 3: things built in their neighborhood. You know, the guys that
Speaker 3: the nuclear industry has been terrible about on public relations,
Speaker 3: about radiation safety. So the public is terrified of these
Speaker 3: things not going to happen. But you know, none of
Speaker 3: the stuff is meant to work built, right, I mean,
Speaker 3: the point of leftism is to basically roll a hand
Speaker 3: grenade into society and when you know, and then the
Speaker 3: survivors will ask the government to you know, control their lives.
Speaker 3: And so the government is in charge of everything, and
Speaker 3: that's the goal of all this.
Speaker 2: Who benefits Let's talk about colleges, talk about universities, talk
Speaker 2: about think tanks. Who benefits through the myth of man
Speaker 2: made global warming. Who benefits from this and who finds it?
Speaker 2: How much money is involved in this? I contend like
Speaker 2: DEI is an eight billion dollar a year industry. If
Speaker 2: anyone jumps out of line and don't believe in the
Speaker 2: principles of DEI or d ie out of the pack,
Speaker 2: you've got to be a You've got to be a
Speaker 2: lead animal following the pack. Who's benefiting from all this
Speaker 2: reproduction to EV and also mainly the idea of man
Speaker 2: make local warming causing climate. Who's benefiting?
Speaker 3: Okay, So I mean climate is a multi trillion dollar industry.
Speaker 3: And then there's already yeah, I mean, so you've got
Speaker 3: the wind industry, the solo industry, the EV's, you've got
Speaker 3: to you know, appliance manufacturers that like to make more
Speaker 3: you know, efficient expensive appliances. You've got power industry. You know,
Speaker 3: they prefer to build windmills and solar panels because the
Speaker 3: management makes more money that way. You know. That's so
Speaker 3: you've got this the money making agenda. All the you
Speaker 3: know institutions in the United States, all of them are
Speaker 3: on the climate agenda because they all get grants from that,
Speaker 3: you know, multi trillion dollar industry. But you know, but
Speaker 3: the most insidious part of this is are the leftists
Speaker 3: who see climate as a means of controlling our lives.
Speaker 3: They want to tell us where to live, where to work,
Speaker 3: what to drive. It's just everything a kind of toilet
Speaker 3: paper you can use, right. And then you also have
Speaker 3: the Chinese, all right, communist Chinese, they want to you know,
Speaker 3: their goal is to be the long global superpower by
Speaker 3: twenty forty nine, and they're subverting our country. You know
Speaker 3: that we have Chinese spies and influence agents all over
Speaker 3: the place. They're getting us hooked on Chinese products like
Speaker 3: easys and wind turbines and solar panels and electric transformers.
Speaker 3: We have outsourced our economy to China in a significant way.
Speaker 3: And you know, if China attacked US, I dobt there'd
Speaker 3: be anything we could do about it, because they could
Speaker 3: just shut down our economy.
Speaker 1: And that's not Steve malloy saying that.
Speaker 2: That's the FBI director Chris and Ferray who says that
Speaker 2: the malware, millions of bits of malware all over our
Speaker 2: country can shut down the United States of America through
Speaker 2: malware and the hands of Chinese communists. Now, lastly, next week,
Speaker 2: when the Trump start sees his power on Monday, and
Speaker 2: away we go. He's going to want to put strings
Speaker 2: attached to the bailout money for California, which you probably
Speaker 2: don't have. Number one, is that a good or is
Speaker 2: that a bad idea?
Speaker 3: Well, I'm not for federal taxpayer bail out of California.
Speaker 3: I mean, California could change its own policies. You know,
Speaker 3: they could stop building with mill solar panels e V crap.
Speaker 3: They could make it a business friendly environment. They could
Speaker 3: start production of oil and gas in California. They can
Speaker 3: bring back the timber industry. They could pay for all this. Okay,
Speaker 3: this is the seventh largest economy to glow. Federal taxpayers should
Speaker 3: not be.
Speaker 1: On the hook.
Speaker 3: Uh. But but that said, I mean to the extent
Speaker 3: federal taxpayers. If federal tax payers are going to be
Speaker 3: on the hooked, and I think that Donald Trump, uh,
Speaker 3: California should go into a federal receivership and make McDonald
Speaker 3: trump governor until the state gets back on its steat.
Speaker 1: That'd be popular, That'd be real popular.
Speaker 3: And and then and then you know, once a new government,
Speaker 3: you know, think of a reconstruction. Once the new government
Speaker 3: is established, the same government. Then California can be you know,
Speaker 3: admitted back into the Union and we go forward.
Speaker 2: What don't you think, Uh well, I take you like, well,
Speaker 2: what we got Canada, we got Greenland, we got the
Speaker 2: Panama Canal in California, Let's bring California into the United
Speaker 2: States of America. Get rid of Nero Newsom, who, by
Speaker 2: the way, the Democrats claim he's the next president. Can
Speaker 2: you imagine Gavin Newsom is the president four years from now.
Speaker 2: He raises his right hand. We're gonna de industrialize the world.
Speaker 1: No more gas, no more oil.
Speaker 2: By the way, We're gonna put diapers on cowsand pigs,
Speaker 2: get rid of all of them. We're gonna be pastoral again.
Speaker 2: I'll be living in a cave somewhere in Iowa. Unbelievable.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think his presidential hopes has gone up in smoke.
Speaker 1: Let's leave it at that.
Speaker 3: Very good.
Speaker 2: Steve molloy, you're the best there is. Check it out
Speaker 2: junk science dot com. Steve malloy, you're a great American.
Speaker 2: Thank you, very thank you.
Speaker 1: I'm not kidding about this.
Speaker 2: They claim that Gavin Newsom, one of the gargoyles from California,
Speaker 2: is going to control the entire nation's power grid. And
Speaker 2: if that happens, I'm gonna move to Madagascar and start
Speaker 2: maybe breeding kmodo dragons for a living in Madagascar. You'll
Speaker 2: find me there. Wow, it only gets worse. Trillions and
Speaker 2: trillions of dollars is invested, and so called the New
Speaker 2: Green Deal, trillions of dollars, and these industries and the
Speaker 2: communist Red Chinese are not going to give up easily.
Speaker 2: Let's continue with more Bill cunning into Grand American Live
Speaker 2: at your Home of the Bengals, News Radio seven hundred
Speaker 2: WLW