WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.320 --> 00:00:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Aaron, what's happening? Man?

2
00:00:04.839 --> 00:00:07.000
<v Speaker 2>We don't seem like the kind of guys who really

3
00:00:07.080 --> 00:00:09.400
<v Speaker 2>like to read a lot, so this is this is

4
00:00:09.439 --> 00:00:10.080
<v Speaker 2>getting weird.

5
00:00:10.759 --> 00:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't read so good, them words as hard.

6
00:00:15.880 --> 00:00:18.519
<v Speaker 2>So you had the idea for doing this one, I

7
00:00:18.559 --> 00:00:22.480
<v Speaker 2>will read it. But so tell me why did you

8
00:00:22.519 --> 00:00:27.800
<v Speaker 2>want to do chapter three of James Burnham's The Managerial Revolution?

9
00:00:29.160 --> 00:00:32.759
<v Speaker 1>So I knew that we wouldn't have enough time or

10
00:00:33.079 --> 00:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>willpower to do the entire thing. I I would, I

11
00:00:36.600 --> 00:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>would make that my life's work and my my magnum opus.

12
00:00:40.079 --> 00:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>But chapter three really stuck with me, mostly because of

13
00:00:45.520 --> 00:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>my my background and my my near group and in group,

14
00:00:50.479 --> 00:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the in the libertarian sphere, and uh,

15
00:00:53.759 --> 00:00:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I I never really considered the fact that you know,

16
00:00:58.560 --> 00:01:01.039
<v Speaker 1>I I've always had that binary brain of it's it's

17
00:01:01.079 --> 00:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>either capitalism or socialism. And you know, I've I've kind

18
00:01:04.760 --> 00:01:07.799
<v Speaker 1>of adopted the uh, the way I thought that socialism

19
00:01:07.920 --> 00:01:11.879
<v Speaker 1>is encroaching, and you know, it's not, it's not anywhere

20
00:01:11.920 --> 00:01:16.079
<v Speaker 1>near what like somebody like Lenin would would view as socialism.

21
00:01:16.359 --> 00:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, and particularly for this book, when

22
00:01:22.799 --> 00:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>when when we were reading uh uh State and Revolution,

23
00:01:27.640 --> 00:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>m hm. The sheer amount of things that Lenin called

24
00:01:32.280 --> 00:01:36.079
<v Speaker 1>like just called it. Uh. I mean throughout that reading,

25
00:01:36.120 --> 00:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it was like he was spot on with a lot

26
00:01:37.959 --> 00:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of things. And uh, throughout my incomplete reading of this,

27
00:01:42.959 --> 00:01:45.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm still in the middle of it. Uh. Every page

28
00:01:45.959 --> 00:01:50.159
<v Speaker 1>has something that I can immediately point to, a tangible

29
00:01:50.200 --> 00:01:52.959
<v Speaker 1>aspect of something I deal with every day and be like, yeah,

30
00:01:53.599 --> 00:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Burnham called it.

31
00:01:56.400 --> 00:01:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I read it this afternoon because it's only it's

32
00:01:59.200 --> 00:02:02.000
<v Speaker 2>only a night nine pages, seven, eight or nine pages,

33
00:02:02.040 --> 00:02:06.680
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, I was stopping constantly because I was just like,

34
00:02:06.799 --> 00:02:09.840
<v Speaker 2>oh man, I have to ponder that. I really have

35
00:02:09.919 --> 00:02:13.960
<v Speaker 2>to ponder that. So all right, well, I mean we

36
00:02:14.080 --> 00:02:16.960
<v Speaker 2>usually do like twenty five or thirty pages and it

37
00:02:17.000 --> 00:02:21.400
<v Speaker 2>goes so stop anytime I'll start reading it, okay, absolutely,

38
00:02:21.680 --> 00:02:25.680
<v Speaker 2>all right. Chapter three, The Theory of the Permanence of

39
00:02:25.840 --> 00:02:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Capitalism by former Trotskyite James Burnham. During the past century, dozens,

40
00:02:33.960 --> 00:02:37.240
<v Speaker 2>perhaps even hundreds, of theories of history have been elaborated.

41
00:02:37.879 --> 00:02:41.520
<v Speaker 2>These differ endlessly among themselves in the words they use,

42
00:02:41.879 --> 00:02:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the causal explanations they offer for the historical process, the

43
00:02:45.599 --> 00:02:50.280
<v Speaker 2>alleged laws of history which they seem to discover, But

44
00:02:50.439 --> 00:02:53.560
<v Speaker 2>most of these differences are irrelevant to the central problem

45
00:02:53.680 --> 00:02:58.000
<v Speaker 2>with which this book is concerned. That problem is to discover,

46
00:02:58.280 --> 00:03:01.319
<v Speaker 2>if possible, what type, if indeed it is to be

47
00:03:01.360 --> 00:03:05.039
<v Speaker 2>a different type of social organization is on the immediate

48
00:03:05.240 --> 00:03:09.280
<v Speaker 2>historical horizon. I will pause to say that this book

49
00:03:09.360 --> 00:03:14.439
<v Speaker 2>was released in nineteen forty one, so he's positing what's

50
00:03:14.479 --> 00:03:17.719
<v Speaker 2>going to happen, and he probably start he probably wrote

51
00:03:17.759 --> 00:03:18.879
<v Speaker 2>this in nineteen forty.

52
00:03:19.680 --> 00:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>And he's kind of setting you up, especially you know,

53
00:03:23.240 --> 00:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>us US libertarians or former libertarians of what I'd consider

54
00:03:27.719 --> 00:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>myself to be. So when you're reading this, whatever definition

55
00:03:31.120 --> 00:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of capitalism he's using, he knows it's not real capitalism, bro,

56
00:03:34.719 --> 00:03:39.919
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't care. It's capitalism and its totality, whatever

57
00:03:39.960 --> 00:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>your definition is, that's what he's talking.

58
00:03:42.000 --> 00:03:46.759
<v Speaker 2>About with reference to this specific problem. All of the theories,

59
00:03:46.800 --> 00:03:49.199
<v Speaker 2>with the exception of those few which approximate to the

60
00:03:49.199 --> 00:03:53.000
<v Speaker 2>theory of the managerial revolution, boil down to two and

61
00:03:53.120 --> 00:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>only two. The first of these. The first of these

62
00:03:56.840 --> 00:04:01.639
<v Speaker 2>predicts that capitalism will continue for an indefinite but long time,

63
00:04:02.159 --> 00:04:06.120
<v Speaker 2>if not forever. That is, that the major institutions of

64
00:04:06.199 --> 00:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>capitalist society, or at least most of them will not

65
00:04:09.759 --> 00:04:15.280
<v Speaker 2>be radically changed. The second predicts that capitalist society will

66
00:04:15.319 --> 00:04:21.279
<v Speaker 2>be replaced by socialist society. The theory of the managerial revolution

67
00:04:21.519 --> 00:04:25.800
<v Speaker 2>predicts that capitalist society will be replaced by managerial society,

68
00:04:26.720 --> 00:04:30.720
<v Speaker 2>the nature of which we'll be explained later. That in fact,

69
00:04:30.920 --> 00:04:37.519
<v Speaker 2>the transition from capitalists to managerial society is already well underway.

70
00:04:38.360 --> 00:04:41.120
<v Speaker 2>It is clear that although all three of these theories

71
00:04:41.199 --> 00:04:43.839
<v Speaker 2>might be false, only one of them can be true.

72
00:04:44.319 --> 00:04:46.560
<v Speaker 2>The answer that each of them gives to the question

73
00:04:46.720 --> 00:04:49.800
<v Speaker 2>of what will happen what will actually happen in the future,

74
00:04:50.199 --> 00:04:55.240
<v Speaker 2>plainly denies the answers given by the other two. If

75
00:04:55.279 --> 00:04:59.279
<v Speaker 2>then the theory of the managerial revolution is true, it

76
00:04:59.399 --> 00:05:03.040
<v Speaker 2>must be POSSI will to present consideration sufficient to justify

77
00:05:03.639 --> 00:05:09.079
<v Speaker 2>us in regard to in regard the other two theories as.

78
00:05:09.040 --> 00:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>False, they're all mutually exclusive.

79
00:05:13.319 --> 00:05:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Right. Such demonstration would by itself make the theory of

80
00:05:18.560 --> 00:05:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the managerial revolution very probable, since apart from these three

81
00:05:23.199 --> 00:05:30.519
<v Speaker 2>there are at present no other serious theoretical contenders. I propose, therefore,

82
00:05:30.920 --> 00:05:33.639
<v Speaker 2>in this in the following chapter, to review briefly the

83
00:05:33.680 --> 00:05:37.680
<v Speaker 2>evidence for rejecting the theory of the permanence of capitalism

84
00:05:38.160 --> 00:05:44.519
<v Speaker 2>and the theory of the socialist revolution, and we're off.

85
00:05:46.240 --> 00:05:50.199
<v Speaker 2>Oddly enough, the belief that the capitalists society will continue

86
00:05:50.240 --> 00:05:53.920
<v Speaker 2>is seldom put in theoretical form. It is rather left

87
00:05:54.000 --> 00:05:57.560
<v Speaker 2>implicit in what people say and do, and in the

88
00:05:57.600 --> 00:06:03.759
<v Speaker 2>writings and sayings of most historians, sociologists, and politicians. Nevertheless,

89
00:06:04.040 --> 00:06:06.199
<v Speaker 2>there is little doubt that the majority of people in

90
00:06:06.240 --> 00:06:09.199
<v Speaker 2>the United States hold this belief, though it has been

91
00:06:09.240 --> 00:06:15.399
<v Speaker 2>somewhat shaken in recent years. When examined, this belief is

92
00:06:15.439 --> 00:06:18.680
<v Speaker 2>seen to be based not on any evidence in its favor,

93
00:06:19.040 --> 00:06:23.560
<v Speaker 2>but primarily on two assumptions. Both of these assumptions are

94
00:06:23.759 --> 00:06:30.439
<v Speaker 2>flatly and entirely false. Here we go. The first is

95
00:06:30.439 --> 00:06:34.319
<v Speaker 2>the assumption that society has always been capitalists in structure,

96
00:06:34.800 --> 00:06:39.800
<v Speaker 2>and therefore presumably always will be. In actual fact, society

97
00:06:39.839 --> 00:06:42.839
<v Speaker 2>has been capitalists from a minute fragment of the total

98
00:06:43.079 --> 00:06:47.160
<v Speaker 2>of total human history. Any exact date shows in its

99
00:06:47.199 --> 00:06:48.879
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of the good.

100
00:06:49.959 --> 00:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>How many times have you seen people cite instances of

101
00:06:56.839 --> 00:07:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I guess, right wing anarchism anarcho capitalism throughout history.

102
00:07:03.000 --> 00:07:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean it always seems forced.

103
00:07:05.399 --> 00:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, extremely like real.

104
00:07:10.360 --> 00:07:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Medieval Iceland, medieval Scotland. Yeah, I mean Ireland. I'm sorry.

105
00:07:16.519 --> 00:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, those are the two two ones that come

106
00:07:19.240 --> 00:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to mind as well, and or like uh yeah, so

107
00:07:25.279 --> 00:07:28.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess what I'm getting at is it's always forced. Uh,

108
00:07:28.959 --> 00:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>capitalism has only existed since maybe the late eighteenth century.

109
00:07:37.199 --> 00:07:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean some people may say the Hanseatic League, which

110
00:07:39.600 --> 00:07:42.759
<v Speaker 2>goes back further, but I mean on any grand scale

111
00:07:43.360 --> 00:07:44.759
<v Speaker 2>in the West. Yeah.

112
00:07:45.240 --> 00:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if if you if you compare it to what's

113
00:07:49.839 --> 00:07:53.959
<v Speaker 1>what's that, uh, mercantilism. Yeah, uh, that's it's very hard

114
00:07:53.959 --> 00:07:57.639
<v Speaker 1>when you start differentiating between capitalism and mercantilism. It's always

115
00:07:57.720 --> 00:08:00.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of a uh, there's there's shape of each when

116
00:08:00.879 --> 00:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you get into that sixteenth seventeenth century and before.

117
00:08:08.240 --> 00:08:12.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, moving on any exact date chosen as the

118
00:08:12.040 --> 00:08:15.800
<v Speaker 2>beginning of capitalism would be arbitrary. But the start of

119
00:08:15.879 --> 00:08:20.800
<v Speaker 2>capitalist social organization on any wide scale can scarcely be

120
00:08:20.879 --> 00:08:25.279
<v Speaker 2>put earlier than the fourteenth century AD, and capitalist domination

121
00:08:25.879 --> 00:08:31.199
<v Speaker 2>must be placed much later than that. The second assumption

122
00:08:31.439 --> 00:08:35.639
<v Speaker 2>is that capitalism has some necessary kind of correlation with

123
00:08:35.840 --> 00:08:43.919
<v Speaker 2>human nature. That's man, yep, yeah, I've been I was

124
00:08:44.519 --> 00:08:49.519
<v Speaker 2>reading John C. Calhoun's Disquisition on government got it down

125
00:08:49.519 --> 00:08:56.679
<v Speaker 2>here somewhere, and his argument for why government is necessary

126
00:08:56.879 --> 00:09:00.879
<v Speaker 2>is the exact same intro is the exact same argument

127
00:09:01.399 --> 00:09:06.960
<v Speaker 2>that anarchists or lays fair economists make for why lays

128
00:09:07.240 --> 00:09:10.039
<v Speaker 2>fair would work. Self interest yep.

129
00:09:10.320 --> 00:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Self ownership, private property or private property is an extension

130
00:09:14.720 --> 00:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of self ownership. And that's kind of an appeal to

131
00:09:17.559 --> 00:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>human nature that I hear a lot.

132
00:09:21.360 --> 00:09:24.360
<v Speaker 2>All right. So the second assumption is that capitalism has

133
00:09:24.399 --> 00:09:28.399
<v Speaker 2>some necessary kind of correlation with human nature. This, as

134
00:09:28.480 --> 00:09:31.639
<v Speaker 2>a matter of fact, is the same assumption as the first,

135
00:09:31.879 --> 00:09:36.440
<v Speaker 2>but expressed differently. To see that it is false, it

136
00:09:36.519 --> 00:09:39.360
<v Speaker 2>is not required to be sure just what human nature

137
00:09:39.399 --> 00:09:42.960
<v Speaker 2>may be. It is enough to observe that human nature

138
00:09:43.000 --> 00:09:45.919
<v Speaker 2>has been able to adapt itself to dozens of types

139
00:09:45.960 --> 00:09:49.519
<v Speaker 2>of society, many of which have been studied by anthropologists

140
00:09:49.519 --> 00:09:52.720
<v Speaker 2>and historians, and a number of which have lasted far

141
00:09:52.919 --> 00:09:57.240
<v Speaker 2>longer than capitalism.

142
00:09:57.360 --> 00:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's unreasonable to kind of in part

143
00:10:00.879 --> 00:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>into your belief system of history.

144
00:10:06.399 --> 00:10:12.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah. With these assumptions dropped, the positive case for

145
00:10:12.679 --> 00:10:16.200
<v Speaker 2>the view that capitalism will continue doesn't amount to much.

146
00:10:16.480 --> 00:10:21.720
<v Speaker 2>In fact, has hardly even been stated coherently by anyone

147
00:10:22.080 --> 00:10:26.440
<v Speaker 2>But apart from this lack of positive defense, we can,

148
00:10:26.759 --> 00:10:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I think, lists certain sets of facts which give all

149
00:10:30.039 --> 00:10:33.240
<v Speaker 2>the grounds that a reasonable man should need for believing

150
00:10:33.279 --> 00:10:36.399
<v Speaker 2>that capitalism is not going to continue, that it will

151
00:10:36.399 --> 00:10:39.279
<v Speaker 2>disappear in a couple of decades at most, and perhaps

152
00:10:39.279 --> 00:10:42.519
<v Speaker 2>in a couple of years, which is as exact as

153
00:10:42.559 --> 00:10:48.080
<v Speaker 2>one should pretend to be in these matters. These facts

154
00:10:48.159 --> 00:10:51.879
<v Speaker 2>do not demonstrate this in any way that mathematical or

155
00:10:52.200 --> 00:10:56.639
<v Speaker 2>logical theorem is demonstrated. No belief about future events can

156
00:10:56.679 --> 00:11:00.480
<v Speaker 2>be demonstrated. They simply make the belief more probable that

157
00:11:00.639 --> 00:11:03.519
<v Speaker 2>any alternative belief, which is as much as can be

158
00:11:03.759 --> 00:11:07.879
<v Speaker 2>can be done. This is in parenthesis in what follows,

159
00:11:07.919 --> 00:11:10.759
<v Speaker 2>for reasons which will become evident later, I do not

160
00:11:10.879 --> 00:11:19.120
<v Speaker 2>include references to Germany, Italy or Russia. Okay, The first

161
00:11:19.240 --> 00:11:23.120
<v Speaker 2>and perhaps crucial evidence for the view that capitalism is

162
00:11:23.159 --> 00:11:27.200
<v Speaker 2>not going to continue much longer is the continuous, continuous

163
00:11:27.240 --> 00:11:31.320
<v Speaker 2>presence within the capitalist nations of mass unemployment and the

164
00:11:31.360 --> 00:11:34.799
<v Speaker 2>failure of all means tried for getting rid of mass unemployment.

165
00:11:35.399 --> 00:11:39.320
<v Speaker 2>The unemployed, it is especially significant to note, include large

166
00:11:39.360 --> 00:11:43.559
<v Speaker 2>percentages of the youth just entering working age.

167
00:11:43.720 --> 00:11:47.039
<v Speaker 1>Le me pause. You're right, there is that applicable to today.

168
00:11:48.039 --> 00:11:53.080
<v Speaker 2>It's applicable to every moment of every conscious moment of

169
00:11:53.120 --> 00:11:54.240
<v Speaker 2>my life.

170
00:11:54.679 --> 00:11:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yep. Mass unemployment now not in the traditional sense

171
00:11:58.200 --> 00:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that people are looking for work and they just can't

172
00:12:00.960 --> 00:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>find jobs because there's no there's no productive positions for

173
00:12:04.679 --> 00:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>them to fill. But if you look at today, this

174
00:12:08.240 --> 00:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>call for universal basic income, universal health care, this this

175
00:12:16.120 --> 00:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on work life balance, I think that's in response

176
00:12:21.240 --> 00:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to not so much people being unemployed through no through

177
00:12:27.120 --> 00:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>no fault of their own, but this general drive towards uh,

178
00:12:31.480 --> 00:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>not having to work for your basic necessities is stemmed

179
00:12:36.519 --> 00:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>from the fact that there's just not a whole lot

180
00:12:39.279 --> 00:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of people working and and at the same time, there's

181
00:12:42.159 --> 00:12:43.879
<v Speaker 1>not a whole lot of people looking for work.

182
00:12:45.240 --> 00:12:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I would. Yeah, I don't know if

183
00:12:50.360 --> 00:12:53.039
<v Speaker 2>I have anything to add to that. Yeah, okay, cool,

184
00:12:53.080 --> 00:12:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna move on. Continuous mass unemployment is not new

185
00:12:57.159 --> 00:13:01.039
<v Speaker 2>in history. It is in fact that a given type

186
00:13:01.080 --> 00:13:04.960
<v Speaker 2>of social organization is just about finished. It was found

187
00:13:04.960 --> 00:13:08.080
<v Speaker 2>among the poorer citizens during the last years of Athens,

188
00:13:08.440 --> 00:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>among the urban proletariat as they were called in the

189
00:13:11.080 --> 00:13:14.039
<v Speaker 2>Roman Empire, and very notably at the end of the

190
00:13:14.080 --> 00:13:18.879
<v Speaker 2>Middle Ages, among the dispossessed serfs and villains who had

191
00:13:18.919 --> 00:13:21.840
<v Speaker 2>been thrown off the land in order to make way

192
00:13:21.919 --> 00:13:27.639
<v Speaker 2>for capitalists use of the land. I pronounced that, right, villains.

193
00:13:28.200 --> 00:13:33.480
<v Speaker 2>I recognize that from Marx I think, so, yeah, yeah,

194
00:13:33.960 --> 00:13:36.799
<v Speaker 2>what is a villain? Hold on? I'm trying to remember now.

195
00:13:36.799 --> 00:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I looked it up once. I read feudal tenant entirely

196
00:13:44.039 --> 00:13:50.679
<v Speaker 2>subject to a lord, so basically close enough to a serf.

197
00:13:52.639 --> 00:13:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Mass unemployment means that the given type of social organization

198
00:13:55.840 --> 00:13:58.919
<v Speaker 2>has broken down, that it cannot any longer provide its

199
00:13:58.960 --> 00:14:02.360
<v Speaker 2>members with socially useful functions, even according to its own

200
00:14:02.399 --> 00:14:06.679
<v Speaker 2>ideas of what is socially useful. Hey, uncle, Ted, how

201
00:14:06.679 --> 00:14:13.159
<v Speaker 2>are you doing? It cannot support these masses for any

202
00:14:13.240 --> 00:14:16.240
<v Speaker 2>length of time and idleness, for its resources are not

203
00:14:16.279 --> 00:14:18.279
<v Speaker 2>sufficient the unemployed.

204
00:14:19.440 --> 00:14:22.679
<v Speaker 1>That's where the Marxists would disagree. They would say, no, no,

205
00:14:22.919 --> 00:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>we have the resources. They're just not being diverted to it.

206
00:14:27.480 --> 00:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, They're being diverted to socially unnecessary production.

207
00:14:33.120 --> 00:14:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Right. The unemployed, however, on the fringe of society on

208
00:14:38.519 --> 00:14:40.720
<v Speaker 2>the one hand, like a terrible weight dragging it down

209
00:14:40.759 --> 00:14:43.720
<v Speaker 2>and believing it to death. On the other, a constant,

210
00:14:43.759 --> 00:14:49.799
<v Speaker 2>irritant and reservoir of forces directed against the society that

211
00:14:49.960 --> 00:14:55.320
<v Speaker 2>is brutal. Man experience has already shown that there is

212
00:14:55.360 --> 00:14:59.039
<v Speaker 2>not the slightest prospect of ridding capitalism of mass unemployment.

213
00:15:00.240 --> 00:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>This is nineteen forty one, so eighty years ago, eighty one.

214
00:15:06.960 --> 00:15:10.360
<v Speaker 2>This is indeed becoming widely admitted among the defenders of

215
00:15:10.399 --> 00:15:13.799
<v Speaker 2>capitalism as well as many spokesmen of the New Deal.

216
00:15:15.320 --> 00:15:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Even total war, the most drastic, conceivable solution, could not

217
00:15:19.600 --> 00:15:22.720
<v Speaker 2>end mass unemployment in England and France, nor will it

218
00:15:22.799 --> 00:15:26.320
<v Speaker 2>do so in this country. Every solution that has any

219
00:15:26.360 --> 00:15:31.399
<v Speaker 2>possibility of succeeding leads directly or indirectly outside the framework

220
00:15:31.600 --> 00:15:32.600
<v Speaker 2>of capitalism.

221
00:15:33.279 --> 00:15:39.679
<v Speaker 1>That that right there, like just really hit home. When

222
00:15:39.759 --> 00:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you have an ideology and you're trying to apply an

223
00:15:45.200 --> 00:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>ideological solution to reality, you're and let's say it's let's

224
00:15:51.000 --> 00:15:55.279
<v Speaker 1>say you're an anarchic capitalist, for instance, You're trying to

225
00:15:55.360 --> 00:16:00.559
<v Speaker 1>game out ways to apply solutions. The law of unintended

226
00:16:00.559 --> 00:16:04.159
<v Speaker 1>consequences will take effect and there's really nothing in the

227
00:16:04.159 --> 00:16:09.679
<v Speaker 1>anarcho capitalist toolbox that can fix mass unemployment.

228
00:16:11.159 --> 00:16:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I mean, they will say that, you know,

229
00:16:13.639 --> 00:16:16.639
<v Speaker 2>the freer of the market, the more jobs will be created,

230
00:16:16.679 --> 00:16:20.639
<v Speaker 2>and you will have one unemployment. I mean, you'll have

231
00:16:20.799 --> 00:16:26.799
<v Speaker 2>zero percent unemployment. Sorry, yeah, yeah, and the only people

232
00:16:26.799 --> 00:16:29.399
<v Speaker 2>who at that point, the only people who will work,

233
00:16:29.480 --> 00:16:32.759
<v Speaker 2>who won't work, or people who can't work. Yeah, I

234
00:16:32.799 --> 00:16:34.080
<v Speaker 2>mean I think that's pine in the sky.

235
00:16:34.200 --> 00:16:38.679
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's that's what I'm saying. The the solutions

236
00:16:39.000 --> 00:16:45.879
<v Speaker 1>applied to reality, if you take it, if you're in

237
00:16:45.919 --> 00:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a capitalist framework, all of your solutions that are within

238
00:16:52.159 --> 00:16:58.799
<v Speaker 1>that capitalist framework, there there's no uh, there's no solving

239
00:16:58.840 --> 00:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it within it.

240
00:17:01.519 --> 00:17:05.599
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think some may argue that because you're in

241
00:17:05.640 --> 00:17:12.200
<v Speaker 2>an anarcho capitalist society and there are no entitlements, no welfare,

242
00:17:12.400 --> 00:17:17.160
<v Speaker 2>no nothing like that, that people will be compelled to work,

243
00:17:17.680 --> 00:17:19.000
<v Speaker 2>that they'll be forced to work.

244
00:17:20.039 --> 00:17:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's true. I've always kind of envisioned uh

245
00:17:25.720 --> 00:17:28.039
<v Speaker 1>not not not trying to straw man, but an anarcho

246
00:17:28.079 --> 00:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>capitalist society is like that ten thousand leak consheines more

247
00:17:33.680 --> 00:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>more of a corporate structure where you know, the cons

248
00:17:38.720 --> 00:17:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Herman Hopp covenant communities. If you take the idea of

249
00:17:42.799 --> 00:17:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a covenant community, will there be unemployment in a covenant community.

250
00:17:47.240 --> 00:17:52.119
<v Speaker 2>And depends on it depends on the constitution of the

251
00:17:52.359 --> 00:17:53.839
<v Speaker 2>covenant community exactly.

252
00:17:54.000 --> 00:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Yep, yeah, So I mean either way, it's it's it's

253
00:17:58.119 --> 00:18:01.559
<v Speaker 1>a nice I love it. That's where I come from,

254
00:18:01.599 --> 00:18:05.319
<v Speaker 1>and I would love to see that implemented. But I

255
00:18:05.359 --> 00:18:11.039
<v Speaker 1>guess what constitutes mass unemployment would depend on the covenant community.

256
00:18:11.079 --> 00:18:16.039
<v Speaker 2>Two. Capitalism has always been characterized by recurring economic crises,

257
00:18:16.559 --> 00:18:20.920
<v Speaker 2>by periods of boom followed by periods of depression. Until

258
00:18:20.920 --> 00:18:24.240
<v Speaker 2>a dozen years ago, however, the curve of total production

259
00:18:24.400 --> 00:18:27.720
<v Speaker 2>always went higher in one major boom period than in

260
00:18:27.759 --> 00:18:31.119
<v Speaker 2>the boom proceding. It did so not only in terms

261
00:18:31.160 --> 00:18:33.880
<v Speaker 2>of the actual quality of goods produced, but in the

262
00:18:33.920 --> 00:18:38.200
<v Speaker 2>relative quantity of the volume of goods compared to the

263
00:18:38.279 --> 00:18:45.640
<v Speaker 2>increased population and plant capacity. Thus, in spite of the crises,

264
00:18:46.200 --> 00:18:50.319
<v Speaker 2>there was a general overall increase in capitalist production, which

265
00:18:50.400 --> 00:18:53.279
<v Speaker 2>was simply the measure of the ability of capitalist social

266
00:18:53.400 --> 00:18:59.240
<v Speaker 2>organization to handle its own resources. Since the World Crisis

267
00:18:59.240 --> 00:19:02.839
<v Speaker 2>of nineteen twenty seven through twenty nine, this overall curve

268
00:19:02.920 --> 00:19:06.559
<v Speaker 2>has reversed. The height of a boom period relative to

269
00:19:06.599 --> 00:19:11.279
<v Speaker 2>population and potential capacity is lower than that of the

270
00:19:11.319 --> 00:19:16.440
<v Speaker 2>preceding boom the new direction of the curve is, in

271
00:19:16.480 --> 00:19:20.160
<v Speaker 2>its turn, simply the expression of the fact that capitalism

272
00:19:20.200 --> 00:19:22.799
<v Speaker 2>can no longer handle its own resources.

273
00:19:23.720 --> 00:19:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And again, uh, for all the mesessians listening, that boom

274
00:19:27.200 --> 00:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and bus cycle. We know it's due to the expansion

275
00:19:29.440 --> 00:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of credit. But you know Burnham, Burnham incorporates central banking

276
00:19:35.079 --> 00:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>into his view of capitalism.

277
00:19:39.319 --> 00:19:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, he's also living in the real world. He's talking

278
00:19:41.519 --> 00:19:46.599
<v Speaker 2>about what's happening now. And yeah, you can already hear

279
00:19:46.640 --> 00:19:48.839
<v Speaker 2>people screaming, well, that's not real capitalism.

280
00:19:49.440 --> 00:19:53.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that boom and bus cycle. I mean again,

281
00:19:53.839 --> 00:19:57.519
<v Speaker 1>like I love, I love an cap theory, but there's

282
00:19:57.680 --> 00:20:05.039
<v Speaker 1>really nothing inherently, there's nothing to inoculate, say, a covenant

283
00:20:05.039 --> 00:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>community with a bank with a currency from a boom

284
00:20:08.000 --> 00:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and bus cycle, because credit credit in and of itself

285
00:20:14.319 --> 00:20:18.039
<v Speaker 1>isn't isn't tied to any type of ideology.

286
00:20:19.480 --> 00:20:21.519
<v Speaker 2>Well, what I would like to say here is that

287
00:20:21.720 --> 00:20:27.839
<v Speaker 2>it looks like Burnham is making like he did say

288
00:20:28.359 --> 00:20:31.759
<v Speaker 2>he did make an immediate kind of prediction. The first

289
00:20:31.799 --> 00:20:34.799
<v Speaker 2>sentence of part three here is the volume of public

290
00:20:34.799 --> 00:20:36.720
<v Speaker 2>and private debt has reached a point where it cannot

291
00:20:36.759 --> 00:20:41.799
<v Speaker 2>be managed much longer. Okay, so some people would say, Okay,

292
00:20:41.799 --> 00:20:45.279
<v Speaker 2>how are we still how are we still going? Well?

293
00:20:45.319 --> 00:20:51.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean maybe they adjusted, they bring in a Paul

294
00:20:51.799 --> 00:20:55.279
<v Speaker 2>Volker or someone like that to get it through. But

295
00:20:55.480 --> 00:20:58.559
<v Speaker 2>what I want to say more about these timeframes is

296
00:20:59.759 --> 00:21:05.640
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to predict when you know something is going bad.

297
00:21:07.000 --> 00:21:10.359
<v Speaker 2>When you know something is going wrong, there could be

298
00:21:10.400 --> 00:21:13.440
<v Speaker 2>somebody out there who has already figured out how to

299
00:21:13.519 --> 00:21:17.160
<v Speaker 2>let how to keep that wrong going. For a long time,

300
00:21:18.119 --> 00:21:20.160
<v Speaker 2>there were a lot of people talking about the fall

301
00:21:20.200 --> 00:21:22.640
<v Speaker 2>of the Roman Empire in the first and second century.

302
00:21:24.440 --> 00:21:27.920
<v Speaker 2>It took a couple more centuries. It does not discount

303
00:21:27.920 --> 00:21:31.200
<v Speaker 2>the arguments that they were making, no, not at all.

304
00:21:31.279 --> 00:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And applying it to now. If you view the United

305
00:21:34.680 --> 00:21:40.519
<v Speaker 1>States as the beacon of capitalism and Enlightenment values and

306
00:21:40.559 --> 00:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>all that, you can you can see its evolution or

307
00:21:45.960 --> 00:21:51.079
<v Speaker 1>de evolution from its from its inception to right now.

308
00:21:51.880 --> 00:21:57.559
<v Speaker 1>And you know, capitalism even, you know, even when deregulation

309
00:21:57.839 --> 00:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and all these good libertarian policies were applied sparingly throughout history,

310
00:22:03.799 --> 00:22:06.759
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't enough to manage the decline.

311
00:22:08.599 --> 00:22:10.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to read the first sentence again and keep going.

312
00:22:11.279 --> 00:22:14.079
<v Speaker 2>The volume of public and private debt had reached a

313
00:22:14.160 --> 00:22:18.200
<v Speaker 2>point where it cannot be managed much longer. The debt,

314
00:22:18.559 --> 00:22:23.200
<v Speaker 2>like the unemployed, sucks away the diminishing bloodstream of capitalism,

315
00:22:24.079 --> 00:22:28.799
<v Speaker 2>and it cannot be shaken off. Bankruptcies, which formerly readjusted

316
00:22:28.839 --> 00:22:32.160
<v Speaker 2>the debt position of capitalism, hardly make a debt in it.

317
00:22:32.720 --> 00:22:36.440
<v Speaker 2>The scale of bankruptcy or inflation, which could reduce the

318
00:22:36.519 --> 00:22:40.200
<v Speaker 2>debt to manageable size, would, at the same time, as

319
00:22:40.240 --> 00:22:46.160
<v Speaker 2>all economists recognize, utterly dislocate all capitalist institutions.

320
00:22:47.680 --> 00:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know, going back to HAPA, any institution,

321
00:22:52.880 --> 00:22:56.759
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a nation state or a company or covenant community,

322
00:22:58.920 --> 00:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>any institution is own to just that high time preference culture,

323
00:23:04.319 --> 00:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of which leads to that racking up of unmanageable debt,

324
00:23:08.279 --> 00:23:13.799
<v Speaker 1>And that kind of segues nicely into I'm why I'm

325
00:23:14.119 --> 00:23:15.319
<v Speaker 1>right wing.

326
00:23:16.720 --> 00:23:19.920
<v Speaker 2>All right. The maintenance of the capitalist market depended on

327
00:23:20.440 --> 00:23:26.640
<v Speaker 2>at least comparatively free monetary exchange transactions. The area of these,

328
00:23:26.839 --> 00:23:30.160
<v Speaker 2>especially on a words a world scale, is diminishing towards

329
00:23:30.160 --> 00:23:33.880
<v Speaker 2>a vanishing point. This is well indicated by the useless

330
00:23:33.880 --> 00:23:37.920
<v Speaker 2>gold hoard at Fort Knox and the barter methods of Russia,

331
00:23:38.240 --> 00:23:43.319
<v Speaker 2>Germany and Italy. I believe if you were at this

332
00:23:43.400 --> 00:23:46.440
<v Speaker 2>in forty or forty one, it was released to forty one,

333
00:23:46.960 --> 00:23:50.799
<v Speaker 2>we get breton Woods in five years, right, I think

334
00:23:50.839 --> 00:24:02.640
<v Speaker 2>breton Woods is forty six. Oh done.

335
00:24:02.880 --> 00:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's the mortal wound to the whatever whatever gold

336
00:24:07.319 --> 00:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>standard we had left.

337
00:24:10.200 --> 00:24:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, it was a forty four summit. So yeah,

338
00:24:13.200 --> 00:24:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the uh try to explain Breton Woods. The best I

339
00:24:17.039 --> 00:24:22.200
<v Speaker 2>can is basically what it meant was that. Okay, So

340
00:24:22.720 --> 00:24:27.160
<v Speaker 2>the delegates agreed that the gold standard would create a

341
00:24:27.200 --> 00:24:32.000
<v Speaker 2>fixed currency exchange exchange rate, so there'd be no fluction.

342
00:24:32.119 --> 00:24:37.480
<v Speaker 2>There'd be no fluctuation, no market. The agreement also facilitated

343
00:24:37.519 --> 00:24:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the creation of immensely important structures in the financial world,

344
00:24:41.480 --> 00:24:46.400
<v Speaker 2>the IMF, the International Bank for Reconstruction in the International

345
00:24:46.400 --> 00:24:50.319
<v Speaker 2>Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which is known today as

346
00:24:51.039 --> 00:24:55.839
<v Speaker 2>the World Bank. So that's your Breton Woods. And yeah,

347
00:24:55.880 --> 00:24:58.400
<v Speaker 2>you're you're right, there's no what did you.

348
00:24:58.359 --> 00:25:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Say, No more market no more yeah, no more market

349
00:25:03.680 --> 00:25:05.599
<v Speaker 1>forces affecting the exchange rate.

350
00:25:06.000 --> 00:25:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Yep, all right. Four the maintenance of the capitalist market

351
00:25:11.680 --> 00:25:15.279
<v Speaker 2>depended on, at least comparatively I already read that one.

352
00:25:16.119 --> 00:25:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Since shortly this is part five. Since shortly after the

353
00:25:19.720 --> 00:25:22.880
<v Speaker 2>First World War that there has been in all major

354
00:25:22.920 --> 00:25:29.640
<v Speaker 2>capitalist nations a permanent agricultural depression. Agriculture is obviously an

355
00:25:29.640 --> 00:25:33.039
<v Speaker 2>indispensable part of the total economy, and the breakdown in

356
00:25:33.039 --> 00:25:36.640
<v Speaker 2>this essential sector is another mark of the incurable disease

357
00:25:36.799 --> 00:25:42.079
<v Speaker 2>afflicting capitalism. No remedies and how and how many they

358
00:25:42.200 --> 00:25:45.960
<v Speaker 2>are that have been tried produce any sign of cure.

359
00:25:46.960 --> 00:25:50.039
<v Speaker 2>The farming populations sink in debt and poverty, and not

360
00:25:50.240 --> 00:25:53.640
<v Speaker 2>enough food is produced and distributed while agriculture is kept

361
00:25:53.680 --> 00:25:57.920
<v Speaker 2>barely going through huge state subsidies.

362
00:26:00.039 --> 00:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if today we have a problem of

363
00:26:03.039 --> 00:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>not enough food being produced, but I know that I

364
00:26:06.279 --> 00:26:09.599
<v Speaker 1>just don't know a whole lot about the agricultural industry

365
00:26:09.680 --> 00:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, but I know one thing I do know

366
00:26:12.000 --> 00:26:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is that it is propped up entirely by state subsidies.

367
00:26:16.480 --> 00:26:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Now, somebody is screaming right now though, that that

368
00:26:21.839 --> 00:26:26.200
<v Speaker 2>FDR had them destroy food in the thirties so that

369
00:26:26.240 --> 00:26:31.119
<v Speaker 2>he could keep prices high to affect supply and demand.

370
00:26:31.200 --> 00:26:35.359
<v Speaker 2>But that's what you have under capitalism.

371
00:26:36.200 --> 00:26:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is a solution well within the bounds of capitalism.

372
00:26:42.680 --> 00:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, a private entity can do that just as

373
00:26:44.960 --> 00:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>well as a public one.

374
00:26:46.240 --> 00:26:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Dan, no man, only the state's evil. Only the state's evil, Dude.

375
00:26:52.640 --> 00:26:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Capitalism is no longer able to find uses for the

376
00:26:55.519 --> 00:26:59.480
<v Speaker 2>available investment funds, which waste in idleness in the account

377
00:26:59.480 --> 00:27:03.079
<v Speaker 2>books of the banks. The mass unemployment of private money

378
00:27:03.240 --> 00:27:07.279
<v Speaker 2>is scarcely less indicative of the death of capitalism than

379
00:27:07.319 --> 00:27:13.599
<v Speaker 2>the mass unemployment of human beings. Damn, this mass unemployment

380
00:27:13.680 --> 00:27:16.799
<v Speaker 2>of private money, that's a really good phrase.

381
00:27:17.519 --> 00:27:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it strikes a uh, I know, it strikes

382
00:27:20.319 --> 00:27:22.319
<v Speaker 1>at my Mesessian sensibilities.

383
00:27:23.640 --> 00:27:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Both show the inability of the capitalist institutions any longer

384
00:27:27.519 --> 00:27:31.480
<v Speaker 2>to organize human activities. During the past decade, in the

385
00:27:31.559 --> 00:27:36.000
<v Speaker 2>United States, as in other capitalist nations, new capital investment

386
00:27:36.039 --> 00:27:41.519
<v Speaker 2>has come almost entirely from the state, not from private funds.

387
00:27:42.640 --> 00:27:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Yep. And uh even now, I mean with with the

388
00:27:47.480 --> 00:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>literal trillions of dollars sitting in futures and uh, you know,

389
00:27:54.839 --> 00:28:01.400
<v Speaker 1>investment portfolios and assets and all that, can we honestly

390
00:28:01.519 --> 00:28:07.559
<v Speaker 1>say that it's being employed in any sense in a

391
00:28:07.599 --> 00:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>beneficial way to society. And this is where you get

392
00:28:10.799 --> 00:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of people varying off and going towards Marxism.

393
00:28:14.200 --> 00:28:19.079
<v Speaker 2>Seven. The continuance of capitalism was, we saw, dependent upon

394
00:28:19.119 --> 00:28:22.720
<v Speaker 2>a certain relationship between the great powers and the backward

395
00:28:22.799 --> 00:28:26.480
<v Speaker 2>sections and peoples of the earth. One of the most

396
00:28:26.559 --> 00:28:29.880
<v Speaker 2>striking developments of the past fifteen years, which has been

397
00:28:29.960 --> 00:28:33.440
<v Speaker 2>little noticed, is the inability of the great capitalist nations

398
00:28:33.480 --> 00:28:37.359
<v Speaker 2>any longer to manage the exploitation and development of these

399
00:28:37.400 --> 00:28:42.200
<v Speaker 2>backward sections. This is nowhere better illustrated than in the

400
00:28:42.279 --> 00:28:46.279
<v Speaker 2>relations between the United States and South America. The United States,

401
00:28:46.359 --> 00:28:50.240
<v Speaker 2>in spite of its imperious necessity for the nation's very survival,

402
00:28:50.640 --> 00:28:53.960
<v Speaker 2>has not and cannot devise a scheme for handling the

403
00:28:54.000 --> 00:28:59.039
<v Speaker 2>economic phase of a temisphere policy. Though during the past

404
00:28:59.119 --> 00:29:02.440
<v Speaker 2>few years, and above and above all during the war

405
00:29:02.519 --> 00:29:06.680
<v Speaker 2>the road has been wide open. Nothing gets done here. Again,

406
00:29:06.799 --> 00:29:10.599
<v Speaker 2>the only workable schemes are compelled to leave the basis

407
00:29:10.640 --> 00:29:12.359
<v Speaker 2>of capitalism.

408
00:29:12.559 --> 00:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Which is war and color revolutions, Yeah, publics and all that.

409
00:29:18.839 --> 00:29:21.960
<v Speaker 2>This is why if you ask somebody, you know, how

410
00:29:21.960 --> 00:29:23.920
<v Speaker 2>did the United States get out of the Great Depression,

411
00:29:24.559 --> 00:29:28.519
<v Speaker 2>they've been taught to say, well, world War two, you know,

412
00:29:28.640 --> 00:29:34.119
<v Speaker 2>Because I mean, honestly, if war is the greatest thing

413
00:29:34.160 --> 00:29:36.599
<v Speaker 2>for the economy, we should just be blowing up our

414
00:29:36.599 --> 00:29:42.240
<v Speaker 2>own buildings and bridges just constantly Oh yeah, infrastructure, man

415
00:29:45.599 --> 00:29:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Capitalism is no longer able to use its own technological possibilities.

416
00:29:50.680 --> 00:29:53.119
<v Speaker 2>One side of this is shown by such facts as

417
00:29:53.160 --> 00:29:55.519
<v Speaker 2>the inability of the United States to carry out a

418
00:29:55.559 --> 00:29:59.240
<v Speaker 2>housing program when the houses are needed and wanted and

419
00:29:59.279 --> 00:30:02.599
<v Speaker 2>the technical means to produce them in abundance or on hand.

420
00:30:03.279 --> 00:30:06.599
<v Speaker 2>This is the case with almost all goods. But an

421
00:30:06.640 --> 00:30:10.119
<v Speaker 2>equally symptomatic side is seen in the inability to make

422
00:30:10.240 --> 00:30:14.839
<v Speaker 2>use of many inventions and new technical methods. Hundreds of these,

423
00:30:15.079 --> 00:30:18.240
<v Speaker 2>though they could reduce immeasurably the number of man hours

424
00:30:18.240 --> 00:30:21.559
<v Speaker 2>needed to turn out goods and increase greatly the convenience

425
00:30:21.559 --> 00:30:25.720
<v Speaker 2>of life, nonetheless sit on the shelf. In many entire

426
00:30:25.839 --> 00:30:30.960
<v Speaker 2>economic sectors, such as agriculture, building, coal mining. The technical

427
00:30:31.000 --> 00:30:35.680
<v Speaker 2>methods today available make the usual present methods seem stone age,

428
00:30:36.240 --> 00:30:40.240
<v Speaker 2>and nearly every economic field is to some degree affected.

429
00:30:42.319 --> 00:30:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Using the inventions and methods available available, would, it is

430
00:30:47.039 --> 00:30:54.319
<v Speaker 2>correctly understood, smash up the capitalist structure. Technological unemployment is

431
00:30:54.440 --> 00:30:58.319
<v Speaker 2>present in recent capitalism, but it is hardly anything compared

432
00:30:58.359 --> 00:31:02.519
<v Speaker 2>to what technological unemployed would be if capitalism made use

433
00:31:02.640 --> 00:31:04.559
<v Speaker 2>of its available technology.

434
00:31:05.200 --> 00:31:10.559
<v Speaker 1>He's talking about achieving post scarcity through automation and all that,

435
00:31:10.720 --> 00:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, we we have that today. We

436
00:31:14.039 --> 00:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>have the means to automate almost every facet of the

437
00:31:17.920 --> 00:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>production process in any industry. And uh, you know, this

438
00:31:21.799 --> 00:31:24.599
<v Speaker 1>is where we get into the managerial state.

439
00:31:25.559 --> 00:31:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, these facts also show that capitalism and its rulers

440
00:31:30.440 --> 00:31:33.799
<v Speaker 2>can no longer use their own resources. And the point

441
00:31:33.880 --> 00:31:40.359
<v Speaker 2>is that if they won't, someone else will nine As

442
00:31:40.359 --> 00:31:46.759
<v Speaker 2>symptomatic and decisive as these economic and technical developments, It

443
00:31:46.799 --> 00:31:51.400
<v Speaker 2>as symptom hold on, here we go. As symptomatic and

444
00:31:51.440 --> 00:31:55.680
<v Speaker 2>decisive as these economic and technological developments is the fact

445
00:31:55.680 --> 00:32:01.079
<v Speaker 2>that the ideologies of capitalism, the bourgeois ideologies, have become impotent.

446
00:32:02.079 --> 00:32:06.119
<v Speaker 2>Ideologies we have seen, are the cement that binds together

447
00:32:06.200 --> 00:32:09.799
<v Speaker 2>the social fabric. When the cement loosens, the fabric is

448
00:32:09.799 --> 00:32:13.519
<v Speaker 2>about to disintegrate. And no one who has watched the

449
00:32:13.519 --> 00:32:16.519
<v Speaker 2>world during the past twenty years can doubt the ever

450
00:32:16.640 --> 00:32:23.160
<v Speaker 2>increasing importance of the bourgeois ideologies. Yeah, impotence so already.

451
00:32:23.200 --> 00:32:26.559
<v Speaker 2>Humble bragged about this on Twitter. I was hanging out

452
00:32:26.559 --> 00:32:32.160
<v Speaker 2>with Jarvin, who basically has gotten people to read Burnham,

453
00:32:32.880 --> 00:32:35.559
<v Speaker 2>and I asked him about this quote, because this is

454
00:32:35.599 --> 00:32:39.240
<v Speaker 2>a quote that a lot of people use to say

455
00:32:39.279 --> 00:32:44.519
<v Speaker 2>that Burnham was not against ideologies. He says, ideologies we

456
00:32:44.559 --> 00:32:47.680
<v Speaker 2>have seen are the cement that binds together the social fabric.

457
00:32:48.480 --> 00:32:52.559
<v Speaker 2>So what I asked Jarvin was, are ideologies for the

458
00:32:52.599 --> 00:32:59.240
<v Speaker 2>plebs and the people who are in power, who desire power,

459
00:32:59.279 --> 00:33:10.039
<v Speaker 2>who understand power, understand that ideology is handcuffs. Yeah, he

460
00:33:10.119 --> 00:33:13.519
<v Speaker 2>seemed to agree with that. So you seem to agree

461
00:33:13.559 --> 00:33:17.720
<v Speaker 2>that the powerful will push ideologies upon people and say

462
00:33:17.799 --> 00:33:19.440
<v Speaker 2>this is what's going to hold you, this is what

463
00:33:19.519 --> 00:33:23.319
<v Speaker 2>holds us together while they are while they are I

464
00:33:23.480 --> 00:33:27.119
<v Speaker 2>have no ideology whatsoever, even if they're telling you they

465
00:33:27.119 --> 00:33:29.799
<v Speaker 2>have the same ideology as you and they're just doing

466
00:33:29.839 --> 00:33:32.400
<v Speaker 2>as they wish with the power that's been granted them.

467
00:33:32.880 --> 00:33:41.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, particularly bourgeois ideologies like monarchism or or liberalism or

468
00:33:42.480 --> 00:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, any of those those those I'm not saying

469
00:33:44.960 --> 00:33:49.799
<v Speaker 1>that to you know, as a as being mean or anything,

470
00:33:49.839 --> 00:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>but uh, you know, if if your middle class abides

471
00:33:54.440 --> 00:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but by a general ideology, like say liberalism in the

472
00:33:58.839 --> 00:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>United States, and then they have you know, different disagreements

473
00:34:02.480 --> 00:34:07.319
<v Speaker 1>and factions scattered throughout, you could still have a cohesive society.

474
00:34:08.519 --> 00:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>If half your society is communist and the other half

475
00:34:12.599 --> 00:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>is you know, liberal, then that's when you're going to

476
00:34:15.760 --> 00:34:20.320
<v Speaker 1>see things like Russia, things like Germany, things like Italy, China.

477
00:34:21.519 --> 00:34:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Yep, I'm going to read that again. Ideologies we have

478
00:34:24.519 --> 00:34:27.840
<v Speaker 2>seen are the cement that binds together the social fabric.

479
00:34:28.519 --> 00:34:31.400
<v Speaker 2>When the cement loosens, the fabric is about to disintegrate.

480
00:34:32.039 --> 00:34:33.880
<v Speaker 2>And no one who has watched the world during the

481
00:34:33.920 --> 00:34:37.199
<v Speaker 2>past twenty years can doubt the ever increasing impotence of

482
00:34:37.239 --> 00:34:43.079
<v Speaker 2>the bourgeois ideologies. On the one hand, the scientific pretensions

483
00:34:43.079 --> 00:34:48.039
<v Speaker 2>of these ideologies have been exploded. History, sociology, and anthropology

484
00:34:48.039 --> 00:34:50.960
<v Speaker 2>are not yet much as sciences, but they are enough

485
00:34:51.000 --> 00:34:53.559
<v Speaker 2>to show every serious person that the concepts of the

486
00:34:53.559 --> 00:34:57.360
<v Speaker 2>bourgeois ideologies are not written in the stars, or not

487
00:34:57.559 --> 00:35:02.119
<v Speaker 2>universal laws of nature, but aret best, just temporary expressions

488
00:35:02.119 --> 00:35:05.400
<v Speaker 2>of the interests and ideals of a particular class of

489
00:35:05.440 --> 00:35:09.199
<v Speaker 2>men at a particular historical time.

490
00:35:10.480 --> 00:35:13.199
<v Speaker 1>That was a punch and look out to me too. Yep,

491
00:35:15.239 --> 00:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>we're all just d just in the wind man.

492
00:35:18.599 --> 00:35:21.920
<v Speaker 2>It does not matter how non scientific or anti scientific

493
00:35:22.199 --> 00:35:25.199
<v Speaker 2>and ideology may be. It can do its work so

494
00:35:25.360 --> 00:35:28.480
<v Speaker 2>long as it possesses the power to move great masses

495
00:35:28.480 --> 00:35:33.440
<v Speaker 2>of men to action. This this the bourgeois ideologies once

496
00:35:33.559 --> 00:35:36.800
<v Speaker 2>could do, as the great revolutions and the imperial and

497
00:35:36.840 --> 00:35:40.280
<v Speaker 2>economic conquest prove, And this they can no longer do.

498
00:35:42.039 --> 00:35:45.239
<v Speaker 2>That's so spot on, It's ridiculous.

499
00:35:47.159 --> 00:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to die for libertarianism? You are you ready, comrade?

500
00:35:53.719 --> 00:35:57.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm ready to die to end these lockdowns. When the

501
00:35:57.159 --> 00:36:00.239
<v Speaker 2>bourgeois ideologies were challenged in the sar and this day

502
00:36:00.320 --> 00:36:03.800
<v Speaker 2>and land by the ideology of Nazism, it was Nazism

503
00:36:04.039 --> 00:36:07.119
<v Speaker 2>that won the sentiment of the overwhelming majority of the people.

504
00:36:07.719 --> 00:36:11.920
<v Speaker 2>All possible discounts for the effects of Nazi terrorism must

505
00:36:11.920 --> 00:36:17.480
<v Speaker 2>not delude us into misreading this brute fact. Then that's

506
00:36:17.519 --> 00:36:18.719
<v Speaker 2>a paragraph right there.

507
00:36:19.719 --> 00:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, jesz.

508
00:36:22.079 --> 00:36:25.119
<v Speaker 2>Only the hopelessly naive can imagine that France fell so

509
00:36:25.239 --> 00:36:28.159
<v Speaker 2>swiftly because of the mere mechanical strength of the Nazi

510
00:36:28.159 --> 00:36:31.599
<v Speaker 2>war machine. That might have been sufficient in a longer run,

511
00:36:31.840 --> 00:36:34.280
<v Speaker 2>but not to destroy a great nation with a colossal

512
00:36:34.320 --> 00:36:38.480
<v Speaker 2>military establishment in a few weeks. France collapsed so swiftly

513
00:36:38.519 --> 00:36:41.519
<v Speaker 2>because its people had no heart for the war, as

514
00:36:41.599 --> 00:36:45.239
<v Speaker 2>every observer had remarked even through the censorship from the

515
00:36:45.280 --> 00:36:47.559
<v Speaker 2>beginning of the war, and they had no heart for

516
00:36:47.599 --> 00:36:51.559
<v Speaker 2>the war because the bourgeois ideologies by which they were

517
00:36:51.599 --> 00:36:54.800
<v Speaker 2>appealed to no longer had power to move their hearts.

518
00:36:55.239 --> 00:36:57.559
<v Speaker 2>Men are prepared to be heroes for very foolish and

519
00:36:57.639 --> 00:37:03.519
<v Speaker 2>unworthy ideals, but they must at least believe in those ideals. Man, Yeah,

520
00:37:03.719 --> 00:37:05.039
<v Speaker 2>he's just throwing haymakers.

521
00:37:06.519 --> 00:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>No, I was. I was. It's kind of a like

522
00:37:08.480 --> 00:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a blue collar trope that like the

523
00:37:11.000 --> 00:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>French are pussies and cowards and all that. But you know,

524
00:37:14.960 --> 00:37:17.880
<v Speaker 1>when I read that paragraph, I was like, you know what,

525
00:37:18.000 --> 00:37:21.239
<v Speaker 1>He's absolutely right, there was. They're no different than anybody else.

526
00:37:21.280 --> 00:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>They just weren't moved. They didn't have they didn't have

527
00:37:24.320 --> 00:37:27.840
<v Speaker 1>leaders worth following, they didn't have beliefs that resonated with them.

528
00:37:28.320 --> 00:37:31.639
<v Speaker 1>And uh, now that's why we're having a retention crisis

529
00:37:31.719 --> 00:37:32.800
<v Speaker 1>right now in our military.

530
00:37:33.440 --> 00:37:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, say the French were pussies in seventeen eighty nine. Well,

531
00:37:40.639 --> 00:37:43.760
<v Speaker 2>nowhere is the impotence of bourgeois ideology is more apparent

532
00:37:43.760 --> 00:37:46.920
<v Speaker 2>than among the youth, and the coming world, after all,

533
00:37:47.280 --> 00:37:51.039
<v Speaker 2>will be the youth's world. The abject failure of voluntary

534
00:37:51.119 --> 00:37:54.440
<v Speaker 2>military enlistment in Britain. In this country tells its own

535
00:37:54.480 --> 00:37:58.360
<v Speaker 2>story to all who wished to listen. It is underlined

536
00:37:58.400 --> 00:38:02.599
<v Speaker 2>in reverse by the hundred of Distinguished Adult Voices, which

537
00:38:02.679 --> 00:38:06.719
<v Speaker 2>during nineteen forty began reproaching the American youth for indifference,

538
00:38:07.360 --> 00:38:12.400
<v Speaker 2>unwillingness to sacrifice, lack of ideals. How right these reproaches

539
00:38:12.480 --> 00:38:20.679
<v Speaker 2>are and how little effect they have? Man, do you

540
00:38:21.559 --> 00:38:23.760
<v Speaker 2>do you see how inconsistent you're thinking?

541
00:38:23.880 --> 00:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Is?

542
00:38:25.079 --> 00:38:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, come on, man, it's like, yeah, it's like telling

543
00:38:28.880 --> 00:38:30.239
<v Speaker 2>a leftist that they're inconsistent.

544
00:38:31.920 --> 00:38:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I just think when I read that, I was like,

545
00:38:34.440 --> 00:38:36.679
<v Speaker 1>I just just wait a few months, when you know,

546
00:38:36.760 --> 00:38:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Pearl Harbor happens, then I like, I honestly don't know

547
00:38:40.840 --> 00:38:44.639
<v Speaker 1>if we would have even needed a draft. Yeah, but

548
00:38:44.679 --> 00:38:47.719
<v Speaker 1>that's not so much them being motivated by any type

549
00:38:47.760 --> 00:38:54.679
<v Speaker 1>of patriotism or you know, love of liberalism and democracy

550
00:38:54.719 --> 00:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and all that. That's it was a revenge thing.

551
00:38:57.599 --> 00:39:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it has nothing to do with ideologies or

552
00:39:01.960 --> 00:39:05.280
<v Speaker 2>that's what they've been able to manufacture. With the terror wars.

553
00:39:06.360 --> 00:39:09.719
<v Speaker 1>They saw how effective Pearl Harbor was, and uh, you know,

554
00:39:10.400 --> 00:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>depending on depending on where where you sit on that,

555
00:39:13.880 --> 00:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they created more or they you know, literally created more.

556
00:39:18.760 --> 00:39:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, if you can't sell love of country

557
00:39:21.920 --> 00:39:24.400
<v Speaker 2>or anything anymore, but then let's sell that. You know,

558
00:39:24.679 --> 00:39:29.440
<v Speaker 2>the Commis are encroaching Korea and Vietnam, the Commis are croaching,

559
00:39:30.000 --> 00:39:36.599
<v Speaker 2>encroaching Grenada, the radical Islamic terrorism, Iraq War one one

560
00:39:36.599 --> 00:39:40.519
<v Speaker 2>and a half two, Great Afghanistan nine to eleven. Wherever

561
00:39:40.559 --> 00:39:45.679
<v Speaker 2>you stand that nine to eleven. In truth, the bourgeoisie

562
00:39:45.719 --> 00:39:50.079
<v Speaker 2>itself has in large measure lost confidence in its own ideologies.

563
00:39:51.199 --> 00:39:53.360
<v Speaker 2>The words begin to have a hollow sound in the

564
00:39:53.360 --> 00:39:58.960
<v Speaker 2>most sympathetic capitalist ears. This too, is unmistakably revealed in

565
00:39:59.000 --> 00:40:02.679
<v Speaker 2>the policy anditude of England's rulers during the past years.

566
00:40:03.599 --> 00:40:06.039
<v Speaker 2>What was Munich and the whole policy of appeasement but

567
00:40:06.119 --> 00:40:10.960
<v Speaker 2>a recognition of bourgeois impotence. Oh Man going after Chamberlain

568
00:40:11.039 --> 00:40:15.199
<v Speaker 2>bad Huh. The head of the British Government's traveling to

569
00:40:15.239 --> 00:40:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the feet of the Austrian house painter was the fitting

570
00:40:18.480 --> 00:40:21.760
<v Speaker 2>symbol of the capitalist loss of faith in themselves. Let

571
00:40:21.800 --> 00:40:25.639
<v Speaker 2>me read that again. The head of the British Government's

572
00:40:25.679 --> 00:40:29.119
<v Speaker 2>traveling to the feet of the Austrian house painter was

573
00:40:29.159 --> 00:40:33.079
<v Speaker 2>the fitting symbol of the capitalists loss of faith in themselves.

574
00:40:34.800 --> 00:40:36.280
<v Speaker 1>The Austrian house painter.

575
00:40:37.119 --> 00:40:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Wonder who that is. Every authentic report during the autumn

576
00:40:41.760 --> 00:40:44.920
<v Speaker 2>of nineteen thirty nine from Britain told of the discouragement

577
00:40:45.159 --> 00:40:48.400
<v Speaker 2>and fear of the leaders in government and business. And

578
00:40:48.440 --> 00:40:51.320
<v Speaker 2>no one who has listened to American leaders off the record,

579
00:40:51.559 --> 00:40:54.599
<v Speaker 2>or who has followed the less public organs of British

580
00:40:54.639 --> 00:40:58.599
<v Speaker 2>of business opinion, will suppose that such attitudes are confined

581
00:40:58.639 --> 00:41:04.679
<v Speaker 2>to Britain. All history makes clear that an indispensable quality

582
00:41:04.960 --> 00:41:08.280
<v Speaker 2>of any man or class that wishes to lead to

583
00:41:08.360 --> 00:41:13.519
<v Speaker 2>hold power and privilege in society is boundless self confidence.

584
00:41:15.480 --> 00:41:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Other sets of facts could easily easily be added to

585
00:41:19.000 --> 00:41:22.519
<v Speaker 2>this list, but these are perhaps the most plainly sympathetic,

586
00:41:23.079 --> 00:41:29.199
<v Speaker 2>A symptomatic sorry. Their effect, moreover is cumulative. The attempted

587
00:41:29.199 --> 00:41:35.440
<v Speaker 2>remedies for them experience shows only gravity only aggravate them. Sorry.

588
00:41:36.159 --> 00:41:39.400
<v Speaker 2>They permit no other conclusion than the capitalist organization of

589
00:41:39.440 --> 00:41:44.480
<v Speaker 2>society has entered its final years. Let me read that

590
00:41:45.320 --> 00:41:49.639
<v Speaker 2>last sentence of the body of that again. All history

591
00:41:49.679 --> 00:41:52.639
<v Speaker 2>makes clear that an indispensable quality of any man or

592
00:41:52.679 --> 00:41:56.000
<v Speaker 2>class that wishes to lead to hold power and privilege

593
00:41:56.039 --> 00:42:02.159
<v Speaker 2>in society is boundless self confidence. It's I mean, can

594
00:42:02.599 --> 00:42:04.079
<v Speaker 2>is there any way you can argue with that?

595
00:42:05.119 --> 00:42:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Not at all, not recently. No, And you know, whether

596
00:42:08.719 --> 00:42:13.679
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about Trump or you know, the Four Horsemen

597
00:42:15.760 --> 00:42:20.119
<v Speaker 1>or whoever else, I mean boundless self confidence like just

598
00:42:20.639 --> 00:42:24.400
<v Speaker 1>having having the ability to be persuasive to the masses.

599
00:42:25.360 --> 00:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>You could be speaking you could be speaking Chinese and

600
00:42:29.280 --> 00:42:32.199
<v Speaker 1>you know they'll they'll follow you. Well.

601
00:42:32.239 --> 00:42:35.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's one of those things that I remember

602
00:42:36.519 --> 00:42:41.639
<v Speaker 2>middle school teacher telling me, you know, and we didn't

603
00:42:41.679 --> 00:42:43.400
<v Speaker 2>have the Internet at this time, so it was kind

604
00:42:43.400 --> 00:42:46.280
<v Speaker 2>of hard to find. But he's like, if you can

605
00:42:46.360 --> 00:42:50.400
<v Speaker 2>find a video of Hitler speaking, you won't even have

606
00:42:50.440 --> 00:42:53.480
<v Speaker 2>to know what he's saying. You will be moved.

607
00:42:55.480 --> 00:42:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

608
00:42:55.719 --> 00:42:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, that's hard for you know, to hear when you're

609
00:42:59.800 --> 00:43:02.639
<v Speaker 2>in middle school and you've already had, you know, a

610
00:43:02.679 --> 00:43:06.599
<v Speaker 2>good ten years of indoctrination into the you know that,

611
00:43:06.719 --> 00:43:10.400
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, Hitler. No, No, there's no way, and

612
00:43:10.440 --> 00:43:12.199
<v Speaker 2>then you like listen to him and speak and you're like,

613
00:43:12.320 --> 00:43:13.440
<v Speaker 2>holy crap.

614
00:43:13.960 --> 00:43:16.280
<v Speaker 1>And then it becomes the joke like say what you

615
00:43:16.320 --> 00:43:19.400
<v Speaker 1>want about Hitler but you know, fantastic orator.

616
00:43:19.599 --> 00:43:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, say what you want about Ussolini with those trains

617
00:43:23.400 --> 00:43:24.000
<v Speaker 2>right on time.

618
00:43:26.480 --> 00:43:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know, if you if you kind of

619
00:43:30.440 --> 00:43:37.639
<v Speaker 1>apply that that idea to our sphere or former sphere

620
00:43:37.760 --> 00:43:45.639
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, it's something that even even the leadership like

621
00:43:45.760 --> 00:43:50.599
<v Speaker 1>at the top can't can't really make that happen. Like, yeah,

622
00:43:50.639 --> 00:43:55.159
<v Speaker 1>the whole boundless self confidence thing. I mean, when you're

623
00:43:55.159 --> 00:43:58.639
<v Speaker 1>in a leadership position and you're trying to move people

624
00:43:59.280 --> 00:44:02.960
<v Speaker 1>like you can't you can't be self deprecating, you can't

625
00:44:02.960 --> 00:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>be speaking a language like you know that comes off

626
00:44:07.199 --> 00:44:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to normal people like you're some type of bug man.

627
00:44:11.320 --> 00:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>You know. That's that's why populism's taking a grip, both

628
00:44:14.000 --> 00:44:16.519
<v Speaker 1>left wing and right wing populism is taking a grip

629
00:44:16.639 --> 00:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. It's because they have fantastic, relatable, persuasive orators.

630
00:44:22.320 --> 00:44:26.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or tweeters or what was the last time he

631
00:44:26.559 --> 00:44:29.960
<v Speaker 2>saw Anthony Sabattini put something out that was like slightly cringe.

632
00:44:30.440 --> 00:44:34.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember. People who don't know Anthony Sabattini is

633
00:44:34.159 --> 00:44:38.239
<v Speaker 2>a state senator in Florida who would be nice to

634
00:44:38.239 --> 00:44:42.400
<v Speaker 2>see on the on the big stage just because he

635
00:44:42.519 --> 00:44:44.239
<v Speaker 2>has no filter whatsoever.

636
00:44:46.800 --> 00:44:50.199
<v Speaker 1>What's uh, what's going on with Matt Gates?

637
00:44:50.719 --> 00:44:53.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. They're trying to they try to take

638
00:44:53.079 --> 00:44:56.840
<v Speaker 2>him down with that whole thing and everything. But I

639
00:44:57.039 --> 00:45:03.119
<v Speaker 2>though was mentioning something this weekend about that about Matt Yeah, he.

640
00:45:04.760 --> 00:45:08.519
<v Speaker 1>You can tell that it's bullshit because the Republican Party

641
00:45:08.559 --> 00:45:12.599
<v Speaker 1>as a whole has not at all distanced themselves from him, right,

642
00:45:13.119 --> 00:45:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it's only the people that have like said anything. We're

643
00:45:16.440 --> 00:45:19.360
<v Speaker 1>like the you know, the anti Trump Republicans that didn't

644
00:45:19.400 --> 00:45:24.480
<v Speaker 1>like him to begin with. Yeah, yeah, yeah, and them too.

645
00:45:24.960 --> 00:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's how I can kind of gauge what's

646
00:45:27.519 --> 00:45:30.599
<v Speaker 1>bullshit or not, because you know, the top leadership of

647
00:45:30.599 --> 00:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the party isn't saying anything. They're treating him exactly the

648
00:45:33.440 --> 00:45:37.079
<v Speaker 1>same as they were before, so you could be rest

649
00:45:37.119 --> 00:45:38.519
<v Speaker 1>assured that they don't have anything.

650
00:45:39.679 --> 00:45:43.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is a hard hitting essay because when you

651
00:45:43.320 --> 00:45:49.039
<v Speaker 2>define capitalism properly, because there is no free market lays fair,

652
00:45:49.119 --> 00:45:51.239
<v Speaker 2>and there is not going to be a free market

653
00:45:51.280 --> 00:45:55.199
<v Speaker 2>lays fair, at least not in our lifetime, and people

654
00:45:55.239 --> 00:45:57.559
<v Speaker 2>can make, you know, you can make the argument that

655
00:45:57.719 --> 00:45:59.320
<v Speaker 2>when I was reading it, I was thinking, oh, well,

656
00:45:59.360 --> 00:46:01.079
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you're in the black market, it's free

657
00:46:01.079 --> 00:46:03.199
<v Speaker 2>and everything. It's like, well, it's really not that free.

658
00:46:03.239 --> 00:46:06.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you like literally might have to protect yourself

659
00:46:06.719 --> 00:46:11.880
<v Speaker 2>with with a lot of firepower, protect your business, and

660
00:46:12.880 --> 00:46:15.039
<v Speaker 2>you never see best You never see best Buy running

661
00:46:15.840 --> 00:46:21.400
<v Speaker 2>drive bys on brands Mart. So yeah, but capitalism. If

662
00:46:21.400 --> 00:46:23.599
<v Speaker 2>you're going to use the term capitalism now, and you're

663
00:46:23.599 --> 00:46:25.960
<v Speaker 2>going to use it in any other way than something

664
00:46:26.000 --> 00:46:34.559
<v Speaker 2>that is pure theory, just use it. It's amazing to

665
00:46:34.599 --> 00:46:37.400
<v Speaker 2>me that the same people that will say, you know, well,

666
00:46:37.559 --> 00:46:41.519
<v Speaker 2>real capitalism hasn't been tried, will argue that capitalism has

667
00:46:41.599 --> 00:46:46.719
<v Speaker 2>gotten out gotten a billion Asians out of out of

668
00:46:46.760 --> 00:46:51.880
<v Speaker 2>poverty in the last thirty years. Yeah, and that I say, well,

669
00:46:51.920 --> 00:46:53.880
<v Speaker 2>that was neoliberalism.

670
00:46:54.440 --> 00:46:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And then it becomes like, oh, I don't like that.

671
00:46:56.719 --> 00:47:04.159
<v Speaker 2>Though, because it was neoliberalism, and it really was, I mean, stop, yeah,

672
00:47:04.199 --> 00:47:08.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, neoliberalism is horrible when you look at idea,

673
00:47:09.199 --> 00:47:11.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, when you look at it from an ideological perspective.

674
00:47:12.320 --> 00:47:15.639
<v Speaker 2>But they did get a billion people, a billionass out

675
00:47:15.679 --> 00:47:18.119
<v Speaker 2>of out of poverty in the last thirty years.

676
00:47:19.039 --> 00:47:22.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. If you view the onset of capitalism as you know,

677
00:47:22.599 --> 00:47:27.519
<v Speaker 1>the old school medieval burgers sezed literally seizing power and

678
00:47:28.000 --> 00:47:34.199
<v Speaker 1>solidifying private property rights from the king that that that

679
00:47:34.199 --> 00:47:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that kind of gives you a historical perspective, and eventually

680
00:47:39.079 --> 00:47:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that system of private property rights, you know, seizing private

681
00:47:43.400 --> 00:47:47.719
<v Speaker 1>property rights, seizing free markets. You know that that came

682
00:47:47.760 --> 00:47:50.440
<v Speaker 1>at a cost. And now we're entering an era where

683
00:47:51.079 --> 00:47:55.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's evolving into something else, whether it's socialism, fascism,

684
00:47:55.480 --> 00:48:01.599
<v Speaker 1>or as Burnham pos, it's a managerial state. Regardless it is,

685
00:48:02.000 --> 00:48:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it's fundamentally departed from, you know, the liberal ideal of

686
00:48:07.559 --> 00:48:08.679
<v Speaker 1>what capitalism is.

687
00:48:09.920 --> 00:48:13.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, what we did find was that managerial, the managerial

688
00:48:13.800 --> 00:48:18.559
<v Speaker 2>state is a lot better than what South Korea had before.

689
00:48:19.079 --> 00:48:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

690
00:48:20.840 --> 00:48:23.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, able to drive able to drive a lot of

691
00:48:23.719 --> 00:48:26.239
<v Speaker 2>people out of cap out of poverty.

692
00:48:26.840 --> 00:48:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And you know, it's it's another thing, like you know,

693
00:48:30.880 --> 00:48:34.119
<v Speaker 1>I I would rather have a managerial state that you know,

694
00:48:34.679 --> 00:48:40.039
<v Speaker 1>I share values and a culture with than a libertarian

695
00:48:40.159 --> 00:48:44.599
<v Speaker 1>utopia of like blue haired obese trannies that you know.

696
00:48:45.599 --> 00:48:51.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, that just reminded me I need to

697
00:48:51.519 --> 00:48:53.519
<v Speaker 2>ask just the Jeff Dice, the question all that I

698
00:48:53.519 --> 00:49:02.000
<v Speaker 2>got write this now, do you still believe I just

699
00:49:02.039 --> 00:49:04.159
<v Speaker 2>think of one of his famoue, one of his famous

700
00:49:04.199 --> 00:49:06.440
<v Speaker 2>quotes from a few years ago and I want to

701
00:49:06.480 --> 00:49:09.440
<v Speaker 2>see what he has to say now that COVID and

702
00:49:09.480 --> 00:49:16.159
<v Speaker 2>everything is completely insane. But the yeah, I mean Burnham Man,

703
00:49:16.199 --> 00:49:20.400
<v Speaker 2>there's something in every friggin reading. And what's funny is

704
00:49:20.440 --> 00:49:24.719
<v Speaker 2>this is I'm doing this with you and very well,

705
00:49:25.239 --> 00:49:27.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to release this next is my next episode,

706
00:49:28.159 --> 00:49:33.440
<v Speaker 2>the very next episode. Maybe myself and Buck Buck Johnson

707
00:49:34.239 --> 00:49:38.639
<v Speaker 2>reading Samuel Francis's chapter out of this his review of

708
00:49:38.760 --> 00:49:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Suicide of the West by Burnham. This is Sam Francis

709
00:49:42.800 --> 00:49:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Thinkers of Our Times James Burnham, where he basically does

710
00:49:46.280 --> 00:49:51.719
<v Speaker 2>a commentary on every James Burnham book I have. I

711
00:49:51.760 --> 00:49:54.039
<v Speaker 2>went and bought another one of these because I'm tearing

712
00:49:54.039 --> 00:49:56.320
<v Speaker 2>this up so bad. I just wanted to have one

713
00:49:56.360 --> 00:49:58.039
<v Speaker 2>because this is right now, this is the book I

714
00:49:58.079 --> 00:49:58.800
<v Speaker 2>can't put down.

715
00:49:59.679 --> 00:50:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I'm you know, going from Lenin to Burnham,

716
00:50:04.000 --> 00:50:06.039
<v Speaker 1>it you can tell that he was kind of in

717
00:50:06.159 --> 00:50:08.119
<v Speaker 1>that sphere at one point because he has the same

718
00:50:08.800 --> 00:50:13.679
<v Speaker 1>polemical writing style and uh like it's actually very easy

719
00:50:13.719 --> 00:50:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to read. You know, you have to kind of learn

720
00:50:16.000 --> 00:50:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a different language when you're reading like the Orthodox Marxists,

721
00:50:20.480 --> 00:50:23.800
<v Speaker 1>but with Burnham it's it's kind of more you know,

722
00:50:23.840 --> 00:50:27.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot less learning curve. No, no learning curve

723
00:50:27.960 --> 00:50:32.159
<v Speaker 1>for me really, But yeah, I would highly recommend any

724
00:50:32.239 --> 00:50:35.159
<v Speaker 1>any Burnham content. But I'm just happy to read be

725
00:50:35.239 --> 00:50:37.159
<v Speaker 1>reading The Managerial Revolution right now.

726
00:50:37.719 --> 00:50:41.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, after you read, if you can get Lenin down,

727
00:50:41.599 --> 00:50:44.159
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to get it down perfectly, but just understand,

728
00:50:45.039 --> 00:50:48.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, have a good grasp of it. Reading Burnham

729
00:50:48.280 --> 00:50:51.840
<v Speaker 2>is a lot easier. He was at he was head of,

730
00:50:52.679 --> 00:50:55.320
<v Speaker 2>he was head of like a Trotsky like organization or

731
00:50:55.360 --> 00:50:57.360
<v Speaker 2>something like that. I mean, the guy was deep in

732
00:50:57.480 --> 00:51:01.400
<v Speaker 2>it and then just took a did a huge yeah.

733
00:51:01.440 --> 00:51:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And then the next chapter it's like on the on

734
00:51:05.360 --> 00:51:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the coming transition to socialism or whatever, he goes into

735
00:51:10.679 --> 00:51:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that workers as a class are very malleable ideologically.

736
00:51:16.039 --> 00:51:19.199
<v Speaker 1>There's no guarantee that they're going to fulfill their Marxist

737
00:51:19.239 --> 00:51:23.440
<v Speaker 1>destiny of you know, uh, seizing power and bringing about

738
00:51:23.480 --> 00:51:29.159
<v Speaker 1>a communist society. They might seize power, but it it'll

739
00:51:29.199 --> 00:51:32.159
<v Speaker 1>look like, you know, either Nazi Germany or Russia or

740
00:51:32.599 --> 00:51:33.559
<v Speaker 1>you know something else.

741
00:51:34.480 --> 00:51:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, even Lenin knew that, and that's why Lenin wasn't

742
00:51:37.000 --> 00:51:42.039
<v Speaker 2>an internationalist like Trotsky. Yeah. Yeah, it was four and

743
00:51:42.079 --> 00:51:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Stalin picked up on that that too, and then of

744
00:51:44.920 --> 00:51:49.599
<v Speaker 2>course later things got things would awry after you know,

745
00:51:49.760 --> 00:51:51.880
<v Speaker 2>certain people got into power and they were like, oh,

746
00:51:51.920 --> 00:51:54.400
<v Speaker 2>we gotta we got to expand this a little bit.

747
00:51:54.800 --> 00:51:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Good luck with that. That's when you were that's when

748
00:51:57.360 --> 00:52:00.119
<v Speaker 2>you realize the world doesn't want this. And when I

749
00:52:00.159 --> 00:52:02.079
<v Speaker 2>say the world, I'm talking about the people. People of

750
00:52:02.159 --> 00:52:04.079
<v Speaker 2>this world do not want this. You know. It was

751
00:52:04.079 --> 00:52:08.360
<v Speaker 2>like when what's his name, I can't remember the American journalists,

752
00:52:08.360 --> 00:52:11.039
<v Speaker 2>he's like the only American who's buried in uh, buried

753
00:52:11.039 --> 00:52:16.199
<v Speaker 2>in the Kremlin or in the tomb there. He John Reid,

754
00:52:16.239 --> 00:52:20.079
<v Speaker 2>I think it was when he went to Russia pre

755
00:52:20.079 --> 00:52:23.360
<v Speaker 2>revolution and he was telling Lenin and he's like, the

756
00:52:23.400 --> 00:52:26.840
<v Speaker 2>American workers will will stand with with the Russian workers,

757
00:52:27.559 --> 00:52:29.039
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, no, they won't.

758
00:52:29.360 --> 00:52:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's smoking crack.

759
00:52:32.480 --> 00:52:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well it's not smoking crack. It's like you're he's

760
00:52:35.079 --> 00:52:39.480
<v Speaker 2>literally lying to him, yeah, to get you know, to

761
00:52:39.519 --> 00:52:41.960
<v Speaker 2>get him to he was trying to get him to

762
00:52:42.000 --> 00:52:48.920
<v Speaker 2>go forth, to push harder in what he was doing. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

763
00:52:48.960 --> 00:52:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Some of those Americans that went over there were way

764
00:52:52.440 --> 00:52:56.039
<v Speaker 2>more hardcore than a lot of even Lenin's inner group,

765
00:52:56.199 --> 00:52:58.000
<v Speaker 2>because you know, Lenon had guys in his inner group

766
00:52:58.000 --> 00:53:02.320
<v Speaker 2>who were like, is this gonna work? Yeah, back to

767
00:53:02.360 --> 00:53:05.480
<v Speaker 2>my farm, everything will be fine. Or we could just

768
00:53:05.519 --> 00:53:09.639
<v Speaker 2>go back. Let's let's get this war over so we

769
00:53:09.679 --> 00:53:15.000
<v Speaker 2>can go back to Germany and Switzerland. You know they

770
00:53:15.000 --> 00:53:17.679
<v Speaker 2>were living the good life there for for a decade

771
00:53:17.719 --> 00:53:18.199
<v Speaker 2>and a half.

772
00:53:18.559 --> 00:53:24.039
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, German intelligence agencies were fucking like rock stars,

773
00:53:26.400 --> 00:53:27.840
<v Speaker 1>fucking making it rain.

774
00:53:29.719 --> 00:53:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, got anything to plug?

775
00:53:33.039 --> 00:53:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can find me on uh not the latest

776
00:53:35.880 --> 00:53:39.000
<v Speaker 1>episode of Timeline Earth due to a scheduling dispute, but

777
00:53:39.199 --> 00:53:42.800
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah you'll you'll eventually find me on Timeline Earth.

778
00:53:42.840 --> 00:53:45.559
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I hope to keep keep doing little tidbits

779
00:53:45.599 --> 00:53:48.400
<v Speaker 1>like this. I'm kind of entering a transition phase in

780
00:53:48.440 --> 00:53:52.639
<v Speaker 1>my professional life and uh taking a taking a step

781
00:53:52.639 --> 00:53:56.440
<v Speaker 1>back from content creation, but uh, you know, I'm always

782
00:53:56.480 --> 00:53:59.679
<v Speaker 1>available for a guest spot, and uh, especially for you.

783
00:54:02.239 --> 00:54:04.800
<v Speaker 2>I want to welcome everyone back to the Pekanana Show.

784
00:54:05.599 --> 00:54:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Has this guy ever been on the show before? It

785
00:54:07.480 --> 00:54:09.440
<v Speaker 2>was just oh Aaron from Timeline Earth. Yeah, I mean

786
00:54:09.480 --> 00:54:09.960
<v Speaker 2>many times.

787
00:54:10.039 --> 00:54:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey you don't, you're my co host.

788
00:54:14.880 --> 00:54:20.559
<v Speaker 2>It's so awesome. All right, let's get to it. I

789
00:54:20.679 --> 00:54:23.320
<v Speaker 2>asked you on today so that we could talk about

790
00:54:24.000 --> 00:54:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Sam Francis. This is actually the book, the print version

791
00:54:27.840 --> 00:54:35.199
<v Speaker 2>of Sam Francis's. Basically it's a review of every James

792
00:54:35.239 --> 00:54:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Burnham book. So every book that James Burnham wrote, he

793
00:54:39.119 --> 00:54:43.000
<v Speaker 2>has a he does ten to fifteen pages on it

794
00:54:43.119 --> 00:54:47.880
<v Speaker 2>to explain what it is and what are we looking

795
00:54:47.880 --> 00:54:53.400
<v Speaker 2>for today? We're gonna do the Machiavellians nice And I

796
00:54:53.440 --> 00:54:56.119
<v Speaker 2>know you read it, and also you said that you

797
00:54:56.400 --> 00:55:00.119
<v Speaker 2>that you thought about when you when you started reading

798
00:55:00.400 --> 00:55:04.320
<v Speaker 2>this review, which was what's it called, Crisis of Modernity?

799
00:55:05.400 --> 00:55:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so the Crisis of Adernity Modernity by Augusta del Nocee.

800
00:55:10.039 --> 00:55:13.760
<v Speaker 1>He's an Italian philosopher born in nineteen ten died in

801
00:55:14.119 --> 00:55:18.039
<v Speaker 1>seventy six, I think, and he's just another one of

802
00:55:18.039 --> 00:55:22.519
<v Speaker 1>those people that basically called it well before anybody else

803
00:55:22.599 --> 00:55:29.840
<v Speaker 1>was calling it. He identified the pretty much the flow

804
00:55:29.920 --> 00:55:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of history from from liberalism into kind of what we're

805
00:55:33.960 --> 00:55:38.719
<v Speaker 1>experiencing right now, which is its logical endpoint, and it

806
00:55:39.199 --> 00:55:43.000
<v Speaker 1>really resonated with me. I've also in preparation for this episode,

807
00:55:43.000 --> 00:55:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I also read a lot of Heidegger and I also

808
00:55:48.039 --> 00:55:51.400
<v Speaker 1>went back into, uh, the managerial Revolution, just to get

809
00:55:51.400 --> 00:55:54.440
<v Speaker 1>me into a Burnham mindset.

810
00:55:54.920 --> 00:55:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Cool, cool, all right, well let's get this up on

811
00:55:57.400 --> 00:56:00.400
<v Speaker 2>the screen and start reading I Love you. All right,

812
00:56:00.440 --> 00:56:04.480
<v Speaker 2>So this is taken from I don't even know what

813
00:56:04.559 --> 00:56:07.880
<v Speaker 2>this text takes it from, because this this text actually

814
00:56:07.960 --> 00:56:11.280
<v Speaker 2>I can't find in PDF anywhere. It was never made

815
00:56:11.320 --> 00:56:13.840
<v Speaker 2>into a PDAF. I mean maybe if someone has it,

816
00:56:13.880 --> 00:56:16.599
<v Speaker 2>they can send it to me. But I just found

817
00:56:16.639 --> 00:56:20.079
<v Speaker 2>this on archive and it had this section of the

818
00:56:20.079 --> 00:56:24.199
<v Speaker 2>Machiavelians in it. So yeah, let's just go and stop

819
00:56:24.239 --> 00:56:29.079
<v Speaker 2>any time. So this is Sam Francis reviewing the Machiavellians

820
00:56:29.119 --> 00:56:32.519
<v Speaker 2>by James Burnham. I think machi Villen's written in forty

821
00:56:32.559 --> 00:56:36.360
<v Speaker 2>one or forty two, a year year after manager or Revolution.

822
00:56:36.639 --> 00:56:41.960
<v Speaker 2>So all right, the managerial revolution has grown out of

823
00:56:42.079 --> 00:56:46.239
<v Speaker 2>Burnham's dispute what Trotsky in the nineteen thirties, and was

824
00:56:46.239 --> 00:56:50.840
<v Speaker 2>an answer to Trotsky Stalinist Russia was not a deformed

825
00:56:50.880 --> 00:56:54.440
<v Speaker 2>worker estate, but a new kind of society that Marxism

826
00:56:54.519 --> 00:57:00.639
<v Speaker 2>had not anticipated, managerial society. Yet, despite Burnham's political and

827
00:57:00.679 --> 00:57:05.199
<v Speaker 2>intellectual break with Marxism significant fragments of Marxist ideology, I've

828
00:57:05.239 --> 00:57:09.039
<v Speaker 2>remained with him and seriously marred his statement of the

829
00:57:09.039 --> 00:57:14.639
<v Speaker 2>theory of the managerial revolution. In The Machiavellians Defenders of Freedom,

830
00:57:15.119 --> 00:57:20.239
<v Speaker 2>Burnham eradicated many of his remaining Marxist preconceptions, formulated a

831
00:57:20.320 --> 00:57:24.320
<v Speaker 2>general theory of human political behavior, and restated the theory

832
00:57:24.360 --> 00:57:28.840
<v Speaker 2>of the managerial revolution in terms of this theoretical framework.

833
00:57:29.719 --> 00:57:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's definitely a uh, not so hidden critique of Marxism.

834
00:57:37.440 --> 00:57:39.199
<v Speaker 1>You can definitely tell you he's one hundred percent away

835
00:57:39.199 --> 00:57:41.480
<v Speaker 1>from Marxism right now, even though that's kind of where

836
00:57:41.480 --> 00:57:42.039
<v Speaker 1>he started.

837
00:57:42.719 --> 00:57:43.880
<v Speaker 2>It's good to have you on here if we're going

838
00:57:43.920 --> 00:57:47.280
<v Speaker 2>to talk about Marxism, because I think we've we've probably

839
00:57:47.320 --> 00:57:49.920
<v Speaker 2>done a bunch of episodes on Marxism together, haven't we.

840
00:57:50.840 --> 00:57:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a few books, few few readings.

841
00:57:54.000 --> 00:57:57.280
<v Speaker 2>All right. In his first book, which had begun with

842
00:57:57.320 --> 00:58:01.440
<v Speaker 2>a long epigraph from Machiavelli's letter, Burnham had revealed a

843
00:58:01.519 --> 00:58:06.599
<v Speaker 2>scathing contempt for what he called ideology. Although he recognized

844
00:58:06.599 --> 00:58:09.519
<v Speaker 2>the social need for ideologies as set as sets of

845
00:58:09.599 --> 00:58:13.199
<v Speaker 2>beliefs that hold societies together, he had dismissed them as

846
00:58:13.320 --> 00:58:17.559
<v Speaker 2>unscientific beliefs that were uncontrolled by facts. Manager of Revolution,

847
00:58:17.639 --> 00:58:22.119
<v Speaker 2>page twenty eighty five. This discrepancy between logic and reality,

848
00:58:22.360 --> 00:58:26.280
<v Speaker 2>between the verbalized form and the concrete meeting meaning is

849
00:58:26.400 --> 00:58:29.719
<v Speaker 2>one that is a persistent theme in all of Burnham's writings,

850
00:58:29.760 --> 00:58:34.960
<v Speaker 2>and one that he explicitly developed in the Machiavellians. Burnham

851
00:58:35.000 --> 00:58:37.679
<v Speaker 2>found in Machiavelli and in the four political theorists of

852
00:58:37.719 --> 00:58:41.320
<v Speaker 2>the twentieth century, whom he described as Machiavellians, the foundations

853
00:58:41.360 --> 00:58:45.880
<v Speaker 2>of a realistic method of social and political analysis. Contrasting

854
00:58:45.960 --> 00:58:51.159
<v Speaker 2>the theological and metaphysical political philosophy of Dante Allegaris in

855
00:58:51.880 --> 00:58:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Demonarchia with the historically and empirically grounded approach of Machiavelli.

856
00:58:58.119 --> 00:59:02.079
<v Speaker 2>Burnham developed a fundamental distate between the formal and the

857
00:59:02.119 --> 00:59:06.239
<v Speaker 2>real meaning of a statement. The formal meaning of a

858
00:59:06.320 --> 00:59:10.519
<v Speaker 2>statement is the meaning which is explicitly stated, but which

859
00:59:10.599 --> 00:59:14.480
<v Speaker 2>serves to express in an indirect and disguised manner what

860
00:59:14.760 --> 00:59:16.559
<v Speaker 2>may be called the real meaning.

861
00:59:17.880 --> 00:59:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Some it's an interesting metaphysical development. I love it.

862
00:59:24.840 --> 00:59:25.920
<v Speaker 2>This is quoting, but.

863
00:59:27.400 --> 00:59:30.199
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, keep going quoting.

864
00:59:30.000 --> 00:59:33.559
<v Speaker 2>By real meaning, I refer to meaning not in terms

865
00:59:33.559 --> 00:59:37.440
<v Speaker 2>of the fictional world of religion, metaphysics, miracles, and pseudohistory,

866
00:59:37.840 --> 00:59:40.639
<v Speaker 2>but in terms of the actual world of space, time

867
00:59:40.920 --> 00:59:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and events.

868
00:59:42.480 --> 00:59:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, metaphysics is like the lens in which

869
00:59:46.280 --> 00:59:49.599
<v Speaker 1>we view reality and truth. So I don't know, Like,

870
00:59:50.320 --> 00:59:53.599
<v Speaker 1>just the managerial Revolution is something I really got into

871
00:59:53.840 --> 00:59:57.199
<v Speaker 1>of Burnham's and U I was about seventy five percent

872
00:59:57.280 --> 01:00:00.000
<v Speaker 1>satisfied with it, and not just because it's a little outdated.

873
01:00:00.039 --> 01:00:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, no, that's what most people think. Most people

874
01:00:04.440 --> 01:00:06.800
<v Speaker 2>say that it's a great book, but a lot of

875
01:00:06.800 --> 01:00:10.679
<v Speaker 2>people complain, well, he didn't get his predictions correct and everything.

876
01:00:10.679 --> 01:00:14.000
<v Speaker 2>It's like, well, I mean, yeah, you're in the middle

877
01:00:14.480 --> 01:00:19.000
<v Speaker 2>a war had just started. Yeah, it's kind of hard. Yeah.

878
01:00:19.079 --> 01:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

879
01:00:21.559 --> 01:00:25.599
<v Speaker 2>The real meaning, then, is the empirically discoverable and verifiable meaning,

880
01:00:25.719 --> 01:00:28.679
<v Speaker 2>the only meaning that has value for expressing the truth.

881
01:00:29.360 --> 01:00:33.199
<v Speaker 2>In Machiavelli, Burnham argued there is no distinction between the

882
01:00:33.280 --> 01:00:37.599
<v Speaker 2>formal and real meanings because Machiavelli explicitly stated his goals

883
01:00:37.639 --> 01:00:40.840
<v Speaker 2>and meaning, did not attempt to disguise them, and took

884
01:00:40.960 --> 01:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>pains to verify them empirically and to make them clear.

885
01:00:46.199 --> 01:00:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Whether this is an accurate presentation of Machiavelli or not

886
01:00:50.079 --> 01:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>is not particularly important to the political theory that Burnham developed.

887
01:00:54.239 --> 01:00:57.079
<v Speaker 2>His purpose was not to write a learned treatise on

888
01:00:57.199 --> 01:01:01.119
<v Speaker 2>Renaissance history and philosophy, but to allow rate on empirically

889
01:01:01.199 --> 01:01:05.920
<v Speaker 2>sound method of analyzing human political affairs. The tradition of

890
01:01:05.960 --> 01:01:10.559
<v Speaker 2>political thought by Burnham labeled machiavellian did indeed derive many

891
01:01:10.639 --> 01:01:14.199
<v Speaker 2>of its ideas from the sixteenth century Florentine But whether

892
01:01:14.280 --> 01:01:18.239
<v Speaker 2>this was an accurate derivation and whether Machiavelli himself would

893
01:01:18.239 --> 01:01:22.719
<v Speaker 2>have endorsed Machiavellianism are separate and secondary questions.

894
01:01:23.199 --> 01:01:29.079
<v Speaker 1>I've heard that critique before. Would Machiavelli have agreed with Burnham?

895
01:01:29.119 --> 01:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And uh? I don't know enough about Machiavelli the actual

896
01:01:34.039 --> 01:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>person to say whether or not he would, But I

897
01:01:37.519 --> 01:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>do know that you know he he did see the

898
01:01:40.840 --> 01:01:45.199
<v Speaker 1>usefulness and in veiling your agenda.

899
01:01:47.440 --> 01:01:50.599
<v Speaker 2>The four thinkers whom Burnham discussed in detail in The

900
01:01:50.639 --> 01:01:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Machiavellians were George Sorel, Robert Michel's, Gezano Mosca, and Vilfredo Pereto.

901
01:01:57.639 --> 01:02:00.440
<v Speaker 2>To at least some extent, all four saw them sells

902
01:02:00.480 --> 01:02:04.000
<v Speaker 2>as the errors of Machiavelli. Like him, they were all

903
01:02:04.039 --> 01:02:07.440
<v Speaker 2>concerned with the problems of political power, not with how

904
01:02:07.480 --> 01:02:11.119
<v Speaker 2>to justify power, nor with the external forms and appearances

905
01:02:11.159 --> 01:02:15.000
<v Speaker 2>of power, but with how men actually use, pursue, attain,

906
01:02:15.320 --> 01:02:20.679
<v Speaker 2>and lose power. Like Machiavelli, all four were profoundly conscious

907
01:02:20.679 --> 01:02:24.159
<v Speaker 2>of the radical discrepancies between the formal disguises of power

908
01:02:24.199 --> 01:02:28.679
<v Speaker 2>in rhetoric, ideology, and institutions and the terrible realities of

909
01:02:28.719 --> 01:02:32.920
<v Speaker 2>power in the actual history of men. It's something that

910
01:02:34.239 --> 01:02:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I can't stress enough is that people can talk about

911
01:02:39.480 --> 01:02:44.119
<v Speaker 2>their ideology, their political ideology all they want, but when

912
01:02:44.159 --> 01:02:48.159
<v Speaker 2>it comes down to ruling. And there's a great quote

913
01:02:48.320 --> 01:02:53.239
<v Speaker 2>from Francis in the book, in the review of Suicide

914
01:02:53.280 --> 01:02:58.440
<v Speaker 2>of the West, where he says, ideology never makes it

915
01:02:58.480 --> 01:03:02.159
<v Speaker 2>never exists in reality because it's formed in a vacuum

916
01:03:02.199 --> 01:03:05.639
<v Speaker 2>outside of reality. So basically, once it's introduced to reality,

917
01:03:06.039 --> 01:03:08.400
<v Speaker 2>it just gets punched in the you know, it gets

918
01:03:08.440 --> 01:03:10.960
<v Speaker 2>punched in the mouth and everything goes out the window.

919
01:03:11.840 --> 01:03:17.119
<v Speaker 1>No, it's a it's a transcendent end goal to point

920
01:03:17.480 --> 01:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to channel revolutionary or reformist energy into UH, into a

921
01:03:23.800 --> 01:03:27.559
<v Speaker 1>transcendent goal. That's all. That's all ideology is. It's UH.

922
01:03:27.960 --> 01:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Like like you said, it doesn't exist in reality, is

923
01:03:29.880 --> 01:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>purely metaphysical.

924
01:03:31.599 --> 01:03:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And another thing that he that Francis says in

925
01:03:36.199 --> 01:03:38.760
<v Speaker 2>the review of stud of Suicide of the West is

926
01:03:38.800 --> 01:03:44.239
<v Speaker 2>that basically ideology is there for the masses. They need

927
01:03:44.280 --> 01:03:51.760
<v Speaker 2>to concentrate on something while the Machiavelians are actually ruling. Yes,

928
01:03:51.840 --> 01:03:54.119
<v Speaker 2>so he gives them something to feel good about. It

929
01:03:54.159 --> 01:03:57.840
<v Speaker 2>gives them an identity. You know, something that I've been

930
01:03:57.880 --> 01:04:00.519
<v Speaker 2>talking about on the timeline a lot today is how

931
01:04:00.679 --> 01:04:05.800
<v Speaker 2>people make their political hir, their political ideology, their identity.

932
01:04:05.920 --> 01:04:08.199
<v Speaker 2>So he gives them something to feel good about. But

933
01:04:08.320 --> 01:04:11.400
<v Speaker 2>then they wonder their whole lives. How come what? You know,

934
01:04:12.000 --> 01:04:14.159
<v Speaker 2>this guy was talking about my ideology when he was

935
01:04:14.239 --> 01:04:16.199
<v Speaker 2>run when he was running for office, and then he

936
01:04:16.239 --> 01:04:19.440
<v Speaker 2>gets into office and my ideology doesn't materialize. Why.

937
01:04:20.519 --> 01:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, A really useful tidbit that I got from Burnham

938
01:04:24.719 --> 01:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>from the Managerial Revolution is that, uh, you know, in

939
01:04:28.880 --> 01:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>order for an ideology to become dominant, people at the

940
01:04:32.199 --> 01:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>masses have to be willing to die for it. And

941
01:04:34.280 --> 01:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of how you know that capitalism or liberalism

942
01:04:38.559 --> 01:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>or even socialism slash Marxism will not be the dominant

943
01:04:42.639 --> 01:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>ideology any at any point in time, because it's been

944
01:04:46.760 --> 01:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a while since people were willing to die for it

945
01:04:49.400 --> 01:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>or willing to kill for it, even at least not

946
01:04:52.840 --> 01:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in mass, not in any not in any great extent.

947
01:04:55.440 --> 01:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know, that's that's kind of the lens that

948
01:04:58.519 --> 01:05:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I view acceleration trying to predict accelerationism from, is what

949
01:05:03.280 --> 01:05:05.679
<v Speaker 1>are some things that are pop that are popping up

950
01:05:05.719 --> 01:05:11.079
<v Speaker 1>now that maybe might be inspirational enough to for people

951
01:05:11.079 --> 01:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>to kill or die for. Well, well, but sure, the

952
01:05:17.039 --> 01:05:21.519
<v Speaker 1>Machiavelians are are definitely willing to die for it, or

953
01:05:21.559 --> 01:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>at least try to send people to die for. But yeah, nowadays.

954
01:05:26.679 --> 01:05:29.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about israeliself. You know what we've seen since

955
01:05:29.760 --> 01:05:30.719
<v Speaker 2>October seventh.

956
01:05:31.079 --> 01:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, willing to kill for it absolutely.

957
01:05:32.840 --> 01:05:34.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I don't think they're willing to die for it.

958
01:05:34.599 --> 01:05:37.360
<v Speaker 2>I think they're definitely willing to drop bombs for it. Yeah,

959
01:05:37.360 --> 01:05:39.440
<v Speaker 2>but it seems like the Huthis are willing to die

960
01:05:39.480 --> 01:05:39.679
<v Speaker 2>for what.

961
01:05:41.960 --> 01:05:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yep, I mean any any sect of islam Is

962
01:05:46.440 --> 01:05:50.519
<v Speaker 1>you can usually find some flowers in there to pluck.

963
01:05:53.000 --> 01:05:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Thirdly, like Machiavelli, they believe that through the observation and

964
01:05:56.519 --> 01:05:59.480
<v Speaker 2>study of the history of power relationships, a set of

965
01:05:59.519 --> 01:06:03.920
<v Speaker 2>generalists about power and men's usage of it could be formulated.

966
01:06:04.199 --> 01:06:08.400
<v Speaker 2>In other words, that historically grounded science of power, not

967
01:06:08.480 --> 01:06:13.360
<v Speaker 2>a philosophy or ethical theory, was possible. That's why whenever

968
01:06:14.719 --> 01:06:17.239
<v Speaker 2>you have these libertarians I was dealing with today on

969
01:06:17.280 --> 01:06:20.719
<v Speaker 2>the timeline, who are like, oh, so, so you believe

970
01:06:20.719 --> 01:06:22.880
<v Speaker 2>in an imaginary line and you don't want people to

971
01:06:22.920 --> 01:06:25.440
<v Speaker 2>cross it. Why do you love violence? Because I do?

972
01:06:27.639 --> 01:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

973
01:06:28.280 --> 01:06:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's like and then I realized when they

974
01:06:31.880 --> 01:06:35.079
<v Speaker 2>were when people are making that asking that question, why

975
01:06:35.079 --> 01:06:38.360
<v Speaker 2>do you have a problem with this? It's very feminine.

976
01:06:39.840 --> 01:06:43.920
<v Speaker 2>It's it's long. It's like literally long housing. It's like

977
01:06:43.960 --> 01:06:47.480
<v Speaker 2>they've they've been completely long, long housed, and it's created

978
01:06:47.599 --> 01:06:48.960
<v Speaker 2>their ideology and they're.

979
01:06:48.880 --> 01:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>Questioning, Well, since the twenties, we've kind of since we

980
01:06:55.119 --> 01:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>started getting into psychoanalysis like Freud and all that. You know,

981
01:07:00.519 --> 01:07:05.679
<v Speaker 1>have you noticed that everything is positive as a psychoanalytical diagnosis?

982
01:07:06.360 --> 01:07:09.599
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, why are you It's it's always it's never

983
01:07:09.760 --> 01:07:12.400
<v Speaker 2>about are you doing this for?

984
01:07:12.920 --> 01:07:13.079
<v Speaker 1>You know?

985
01:07:13.360 --> 01:07:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Did you do this to acquire land? Did you go

986
01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:18.400
<v Speaker 2>to war to acquire land? Did you go to war

987
01:07:18.480 --> 01:07:21.800
<v Speaker 2>to do this? It's always what's wrong with you? Why

988
01:07:21.880 --> 01:07:22.760
<v Speaker 2>would they do this?

989
01:07:23.639 --> 01:07:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Even like in the uh, even like the etymology

990
01:07:26.760 --> 01:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of words like transphobe that sounds like a mental illness

991
01:07:29.920 --> 01:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that you know, eighty years ago would have got you

992
01:07:32.519 --> 01:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>put in put into an asylum. And that's where we're

993
01:07:37.079 --> 01:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>still looking at that today. That's still the norm today

994
01:07:40.519 --> 01:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>is everything is psychoanalytical, everything is scientific, and uh, you know,

995
01:07:45.519 --> 01:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>when you when you talk about good and evil to

996
01:07:48.480 --> 01:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a leftist or a really committed liberal, it's not that

997
01:07:51.880 --> 01:07:54.679
<v Speaker 1>they don't believe in it. It's just that that exists

998
01:07:54.760 --> 01:07:58.679
<v Speaker 1>outside of their metaphysics. And because they don't believe that

999
01:07:58.760 --> 01:08:00.559
<v Speaker 1>this is something I learned from denote or this isn't

1000
01:08:00.719 --> 01:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>believe it, believe it or not, this isn't an original

1001
01:08:02.920 --> 01:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>thought I had, But they don't. They don't have in

1002
01:08:07.880 --> 01:08:12.719
<v Speaker 1>their metaphysics anything that exists outside of science or psychoanalysis.

1003
01:08:12.719 --> 01:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So when you talk about good and evil or you know,

1004
01:08:15.840 --> 01:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>these these things that we always have understood, we we

1005
01:08:18.760 --> 01:08:23.119
<v Speaker 1>white people have always understood as universal metaphysics that you

1006
01:08:23.159 --> 01:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and I can engage in a conversation and be reasonably

1007
01:08:25.640 --> 01:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>assured that you know, we're gonna we're gonna abide within

1008
01:08:28.720 --> 01:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a certain framework that's completely out the window with them,

1009
01:08:31.760 --> 01:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>because they just it doesn't compute. They're like, why are

1010
01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:37.279
<v Speaker 1>you talking about that? Why are you asking that question?

1011
01:08:37.880 --> 01:08:40.520
<v Speaker 2>It's it's like you by asking the question, you have

1012
01:08:40.560 --> 01:08:43.880
<v Speaker 2>a mental illness. You're There's just nothing you can say,

1013
01:08:44.960 --> 01:08:47.239
<v Speaker 2>isn't it isn't problematic?

1014
01:08:48.239 --> 01:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it either list it's a confusion or a disgust response,

1015
01:08:52.159 --> 01:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>which you know we kind of get from them too. So,

1016
01:08:55.199 --> 01:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>all things being equal.

1017
01:08:56.800 --> 01:09:01.319
<v Speaker 2>I was noticing, you know, Stone Toss got doxed. H yep,

1018
01:09:01.560 --> 01:09:06.159
<v Speaker 2>and when I saw there are people openly celebrating it

1019
01:09:06.960 --> 01:09:09.760
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter, and I'm like, this is the most feminine

1020
01:09:09.760 --> 01:09:10.600
<v Speaker 2>thing I've ever seen.

1021
01:09:11.560 --> 01:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yas queen. Yeah, a ninety nine post thread.

1022
01:09:20.399 --> 01:09:24.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, I saw that. Could you imagine taking it?

1023
01:09:24.680 --> 01:09:26.239
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait till he does a comic about it.

1024
01:09:26.359 --> 01:09:30.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right. Behind these common beliefs was a body

1025
01:09:30.319 --> 01:09:33.239
<v Speaker 2>of common assumptions about the nature of political man and

1026
01:09:33.319 --> 01:09:37.920
<v Speaker 2>human history. The Machiavelians saw political life as constantly in flux,

1027
01:09:38.399 --> 01:09:43.920
<v Speaker 2>so the process of change is repetitive and roughly cyclical,

1028
01:09:44.399 --> 01:09:48.399
<v Speaker 2>quoting the recurring pattern of change expresses the more or

1029
01:09:48.479 --> 01:09:52.359
<v Speaker 2>less permanent core of human nature as it functions politically.

1030
01:09:53.199 --> 01:09:57.000
<v Speaker 2>The instability of all governments and political forms follows in

1031
01:09:57.199 --> 01:10:04.039
<v Speaker 2>part from the timeless human appetite for power. Really need

1032
01:10:04.119 --> 01:10:06.600
<v Speaker 2>to make my after teal, I really need to read

1033
01:10:06.680 --> 01:10:10.239
<v Speaker 2>Disquisition on Government by John C. Calhoun because he talks

1034
01:10:10.279 --> 01:10:11.640
<v Speaker 2>so much about stuff like this.

1035
01:10:12.560 --> 01:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Hm.

1036
01:10:14.359 --> 01:10:17.279
<v Speaker 2>Because of the recurrent patterns of change, history moves in

1037
01:10:17.359 --> 01:10:23.479
<v Speaker 2>cycles and is not a uni linear progression. The repetitive

1038
01:10:23.520 --> 01:10:27.760
<v Speaker 2>cycles make possible a science of human political behavior. What

1039
01:10:27.960 --> 01:10:30.239
<v Speaker 2>men have done before, they will do again in the

1040
01:10:30.279 --> 01:10:33.439
<v Speaker 2>future and within the limits. It is therefore possible to

1041
01:10:33.479 --> 01:10:37.199
<v Speaker 2>predict their behavior through analogies drawn from history.

1042
01:10:38.840 --> 01:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, unless you believe in put like that

1043
01:10:41.680 --> 01:10:43.479
<v Speaker 1>we exist in post history.

1044
01:10:45.680 --> 01:10:50.039
<v Speaker 2>Machiavelli and his followers saw men in general as evil quote,

1045
01:10:50.079 --> 01:10:53.439
<v Speaker 2>all men are bad and ever ready to display their

1046
01:10:53.520 --> 01:10:57.399
<v Speaker 2>vicious nature whenever they may find occasion for it. The

1047
01:10:57.439 --> 01:11:01.279
<v Speaker 2>Machiavelians depicted human beings as in satiable in their desire

1048
01:11:01.319 --> 01:11:06.439
<v Speaker 2>for power, wealth and pre eminence, but also as irrational, prejudice, ignorant,

1049
01:11:06.640 --> 01:11:10.079
<v Speaker 2>and easily deceived by others as well as by themselves.

1050
01:11:11.199 --> 01:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1051
01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Mosca specifically criticized and rejected the optimistic progressivism as of Rousseau.

1052
01:11:20.119 --> 01:11:26.079
<v Speaker 2>It reminds me of who is it spangler or optimism

1053
01:11:26.199 --> 01:11:27.520
<v Speaker 2>is cowardice?

1054
01:11:28.640 --> 01:11:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1055
01:11:30.720 --> 01:11:36.199
<v Speaker 2>Peretto devoted much of the six volume six volumes, six volumes.

1056
01:11:36.800 --> 01:11:39.399
<v Speaker 2>Parretto devoted much of the six volumes of the Mind

1057
01:11:39.439 --> 01:11:45.199
<v Speaker 2>in Society to exposing human irrationality and appetitive motivations.

1058
01:11:46.319 --> 01:11:48.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna lie to you. I've tried to read

1059
01:11:48.199 --> 01:11:50.239
<v Speaker 1>original works by Pareto and I could not.

1060
01:11:50.520 --> 01:11:52.199
<v Speaker 2>He's really tough to read.

1061
01:11:52.319 --> 01:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Man.

1062
01:11:52.640 --> 01:11:56.479
<v Speaker 2>I have the I have a couple books, a couple

1063
01:11:56.520 --> 01:11:59.279
<v Speaker 2>of smaller books on the elites, and man, it's it's

1064
01:11:59.279 --> 01:12:00.399
<v Speaker 2>a slogsome times.

1065
01:12:01.119 --> 01:12:03.479
<v Speaker 1>No, you just it's like he introduces a bunch of

1066
01:12:03.560 --> 01:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>mathematical concepts and I can't. I can't do it. I

1067
01:12:07.039 --> 01:12:09.319
<v Speaker 1>can't follow that. I'm not that smart. Sorry.

1068
01:12:10.960 --> 01:12:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Sorell explicated the role of myths and falsehoods in providing

1069
01:12:14.800 --> 01:12:19.800
<v Speaker 2>a unifying force for political action, especially violent action. Michelle's

1070
01:12:19.840 --> 01:12:23.600
<v Speaker 2>throughout his work on political parties, showed how minorities continually

1071
01:12:23.640 --> 01:12:29.479
<v Speaker 2>monopolized power by deceiving and coercing the mass membership. Yep,

1072
01:12:29.760 --> 01:12:34.319
<v Speaker 2>A lot to be said about that right there. The

1073
01:12:34.359 --> 01:12:37.600
<v Speaker 2>emphasis on human evil and irrationality is central to the

1074
01:12:37.640 --> 01:12:42.319
<v Speaker 2>Machiavelian argument Burnham and the Machiavelians saw politics and to

1075
01:12:42.439 --> 01:12:45.359
<v Speaker 2>a large extent, of human condition in terms of the

1076
01:12:45.399 --> 01:12:49.079
<v Speaker 2>savage and incessant struggle for power at all levels of society,

1077
01:12:49.479 --> 01:12:52.600
<v Speaker 2>regardless of how this struggle might be disguised by language,

1078
01:12:52.800 --> 01:12:55.560
<v Speaker 2>symbolism and institutional forms.

1079
01:12:56.159 --> 01:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And see this is where I think Burna kind of

1080
01:13:01.159 --> 01:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>retained a little bit of his Marxism, or at least

1081
01:13:03.800 --> 01:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>his Hygelianism. Is you know, when you're talking about, what

1082
01:13:10.000 --> 01:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>does that say, regardless of all of this struggle might

1083
01:13:12.560 --> 01:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>be disguised by language, symbolism and institutional forms. I don't

1084
01:13:16.239 --> 01:13:23.039
<v Speaker 1>think that Burnham took too much, didn't give enough account

1085
01:13:23.159 --> 01:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>for things that exist outside the dialectic, when, especially in

1086
01:13:27.800 --> 01:13:32.039
<v Speaker 1>his critique of socialism, it was still very scientific, and

1087
01:13:32.079 --> 01:13:35.399
<v Speaker 1>it was still very focused on you know, material and

1088
01:13:35.520 --> 01:13:42.359
<v Speaker 1>economic uh, economic dialectic struggles just not not resolving in

1089
01:13:42.399 --> 01:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a way that Marxist prescribed it would, you know, with

1090
01:13:44.840 --> 01:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>dialectical materialism. But another thing I learned from Denotie is

1091
01:13:48.880 --> 01:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that they really didn't give any attention to the more

1092
01:13:52.680 --> 01:13:56.279
<v Speaker 1>abstract things like you know what what he just mentioned,

1093
01:13:57.720 --> 01:14:02.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, language symbolism, institutional forms, aulture, religion, and just

1094
01:14:02.279 --> 01:14:06.399
<v Speaker 1>things that exist outside of you know, empirical science.

1095
01:14:07.439 --> 01:14:12.159
<v Speaker 2>There's other ideologies that we may be another ideology we

1096
01:14:12.199 --> 01:14:14.720
<v Speaker 2>may be familiar with, who fails to do the same

1097
01:14:14.720 --> 01:14:15.680
<v Speaker 2>thing I assume.

1098
01:14:16.319 --> 01:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean it's there's I hate to say,

1099
01:14:19.600 --> 01:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I hate using this word, but it's nuanced, which doesn't

1100
01:14:24.520 --> 01:14:25.359
<v Speaker 1>really say anything.

1101
01:14:26.439 --> 01:14:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Driven by insatiable app insatiable appetites and irrational beliefs, men

1102
01:14:30.600 --> 01:14:34.319
<v Speaker 2>seek to dominate each other or to escape domination by others.

1103
01:14:34.840 --> 01:14:38.039
<v Speaker 2>This struggle invariably results in a minority coming to power,

1104
01:14:38.239 --> 01:14:44.199
<v Speaker 2>monopolizing as much as possible political, economic, military, technical, and

1105
01:14:44.279 --> 01:14:49.359
<v Speaker 2>honorific resources, and excluding and oppressing the majority. Thus is

1106
01:14:49.439 --> 01:14:54.920
<v Speaker 2>formed an elite peretto ruling class mosca or oligarchy Michelle's

1107
01:14:55.239 --> 01:14:58.119
<v Speaker 2>that rules the majority and exploits it for its own

1108
01:14:58.199 --> 01:15:02.760
<v Speaker 2>benefit through force and odd The rule of elites and

1109
01:15:02.840 --> 01:15:06.800
<v Speaker 2>human societies is inevitable, and therefore oligarchy is the only

1110
01:15:06.880 --> 01:15:11.640
<v Speaker 2>possible distribution of power. What what Michelle's called the iron

1111
01:15:11.720 --> 01:15:13.000
<v Speaker 2>law of oligarchy.

1112
01:15:14.880 --> 01:15:17.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you had asked me if I agree

1113
01:15:17.399 --> 01:15:20.159
<v Speaker 1>with that five ten years or yeah, ten years ago,

1114
01:15:20.279 --> 01:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>now I would have would have called you a statist.

1115
01:15:24.920 --> 01:15:29.159
<v Speaker 2>Now you just you become a realist and then in

1116
01:15:29.199 --> 01:15:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the eyes of some that means that you're immoral.

1117
01:15:32.840 --> 01:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, this is this is scientific. It is,

1118
01:15:36.640 --> 01:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it is. It is an observable fact that power is

1119
01:15:39.960 --> 01:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>always concentrated and select few individuals. And they're not very

1120
01:15:45.039 --> 01:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>nice people.

1121
01:15:46.720 --> 01:15:47.600
<v Speaker 2>We know science, they're not.

1122
01:15:47.720 --> 01:15:49.039
<v Speaker 1>They're all libertarians.

1123
01:15:49.359 --> 01:15:53.359
<v Speaker 2>We know science is racist. So yeah, there is no

1124
01:15:53.479 --> 01:15:57.079
<v Speaker 2>end to oligarchical rule. Although one elite may lose its

1125
01:15:57.119 --> 01:16:01.359
<v Speaker 2>power in power indeed always is its power, sooner or

1126
01:16:01.439 --> 01:16:04.680
<v Speaker 2>later another minority takes its place through what Pereto calls

1127
01:16:04.720 --> 01:16:08.119
<v Speaker 2>the circulation of elites, and the record of this unending

1128
01:16:08.239 --> 01:16:12.319
<v Speaker 2>rise and fall of ruling minorities in human is human history.

1129
01:16:13.279 --> 01:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So one thing I wanted to pick your brain on

1130
01:16:15.880 --> 01:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>having listened to your episode with uh Catgirl Kulak today,

1131
01:16:20.279 --> 01:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is I wanted I wanted to ask you what do

1132
01:16:23.079 --> 01:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you what do you suspect will be the circulation of elites? If, if,

1133
01:16:28.920 --> 01:16:33.319
<v Speaker 1>or when his his predictions of a full on collapse

1134
01:16:33.359 --> 01:16:36.039
<v Speaker 1>by twenty thirty, what what does that circulation of elites

1135
01:16:36.159 --> 01:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>look like?

1136
01:16:38.439 --> 01:16:43.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think it It may break down regionally.

1137
01:16:45.079 --> 01:16:47.720
<v Speaker 2>You may have new elites stepping up, or you know,

1138
01:16:47.800 --> 01:16:54.319
<v Speaker 2>most of the time it's it's existing release elites. You

1139
01:16:54.399 --> 01:16:56.960
<v Speaker 2>just they just you know, it's like people have said,

1140
01:16:57.840 --> 01:17:01.239
<v Speaker 2>because we've been talking about the PayPal mafia and how

1141
01:17:01.640 --> 01:17:04.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, we see them as trying to make a

1142
01:17:04.319 --> 01:17:08.279
<v Speaker 2>move right now and push the elites out and take over.

1143
01:17:08.960 --> 01:17:11.800
<v Speaker 2>And you know, someone made the comment, well, they're already

1144
01:17:11.840 --> 01:17:14.920
<v Speaker 2>a part of the elites, you know, t Loans, Palins here,

1145
01:17:15.239 --> 01:17:19.279
<v Speaker 2>all these countries. But I think Aaron McIntyre made a

1146
01:17:19.279 --> 01:17:22.399
<v Speaker 2>really good point today. He said the elites always come

1147
01:17:22.479 --> 01:17:28.319
<v Speaker 2>from within. I mean Caesar wasn't Caesar wasn't an outsider. Yeah,

1148
01:17:28.359 --> 01:17:32.359
<v Speaker 2>you know pin o Ch. You know when you have

1149
01:17:32.600 --> 01:17:35.159
<v Speaker 2>when you have radical change. You know, p o Ch

1150
01:17:35.439 --> 01:17:39.159
<v Speaker 2>was not. I mean he didn't come in from another country.

1151
01:17:39.239 --> 01:17:42.479
<v Speaker 2>He was in the military. He was somebody that everyone knew.

1152
01:17:43.319 --> 01:17:46.439
<v Speaker 2>The circulation of elites always happens from the inside. So

1153
01:17:46.520 --> 01:17:49.119
<v Speaker 2>if you're thinking that your neighbor, you know, is going

1154
01:17:49.199 --> 01:17:50.840
<v Speaker 2>to be an elite unless you write, you know, do

1155
01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:54.279
<v Speaker 2>like Kappa the teachers, and you do it locally and

1156
01:17:54.319 --> 01:17:57.279
<v Speaker 2>you you know, find a natural elite and you raise

1157
01:17:57.399 --> 01:18:00.199
<v Speaker 2>them up to you know, take over and help to

1158
01:18:00.640 --> 01:18:06.920
<v Speaker 2>change a locale. Then you'll know that this person is

1159
01:18:06.960 --> 01:18:11.640
<v Speaker 2>coming in from outside, but I mean at the national level,

1160
01:18:11.680 --> 01:18:16.680
<v Speaker 2>at a government level, at a oligarchical level, it's always

1161
01:18:16.680 --> 01:18:19.039
<v Speaker 2>going to be from the existing elites. They're just going

1162
01:18:19.119 --> 01:18:21.359
<v Speaker 2>to move in and they're just going to switch them out,

1163
01:18:21.760 --> 01:18:24.560
<v Speaker 2>and you're just going to hope that it's going to

1164
01:18:24.640 --> 01:18:26.800
<v Speaker 2>be they're going to be more in your favor than

1165
01:18:26.800 --> 01:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>the previous elites. But if everything does fall apart at

1166
01:18:30.000 --> 01:18:35.359
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirty, I mean, all I see is people will

1167
01:18:35.399 --> 01:18:39.600
<v Speaker 2>be begging for anybody. And I think that the person,

1168
01:18:40.520 --> 01:18:46.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, whoever has set themselves up with the most

1169
01:18:46.840 --> 01:18:51.000
<v Speaker 2>with a rhetoric of we're Americans, we should be proud

1170
01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:54.119
<v Speaker 2>of our heritage. We can take our heritage back. We

1171
01:18:54.159 --> 01:18:55.880
<v Speaker 2>don't have to put up with it, we don't have

1172
01:18:55.920 --> 01:18:58.880
<v Speaker 2>to put up with us. I think that is that's

1173
01:18:58.960 --> 01:19:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the person who is more going to be to circulate

1174
01:19:05.359 --> 01:19:08.560
<v Speaker 2>in and out, and who's somebody who they may potentially

1175
01:19:08.800 --> 01:19:12.079
<v Speaker 2>look to in order to try to get them out

1176
01:19:12.119 --> 01:19:12.840
<v Speaker 2>of that situation.

1177
01:19:14.000 --> 01:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, the reason why this would be so unprecedented,

1178
01:19:18.079 --> 01:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>if I mean, one of the reasons why the main

1179
01:19:21.159 --> 01:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>reason I think about is when I think of a collapse,

1180
01:19:23.439 --> 01:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I think and I think of a power vacuum, and

1181
01:19:25.840 --> 01:19:28.159
<v Speaker 1>who fills that power vacuum. It's whoever has the most

1182
01:19:28.159 --> 01:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>hard power and whoever has the most energy behind them.

1183
01:19:31.359 --> 01:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>And right now, well, you know, if theoretically a few

1184
01:19:35.960 --> 01:19:39.159
<v Speaker 1>years before collapse, there's a lot of energy stored right

1185
01:19:39.199 --> 01:19:42.039
<v Speaker 1>now and it's just waiting to burst. So if his

1186
01:19:42.159 --> 01:19:45.239
<v Speaker 1>prediction is correct, man, that's going to be crazy, because

1187
01:19:45.800 --> 01:19:48.199
<v Speaker 1>I think people right now are just you know, the

1188
01:19:48.239 --> 01:19:50.199
<v Speaker 1>only thing stopping them right now is you know, they

1189
01:19:50.199 --> 01:19:52.279
<v Speaker 1>have a job, they get to you know, they have

1190
01:19:52.319 --> 01:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a family. They may not have access to a whole

1191
01:19:55.800 --> 01:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of hard power. But man, like, wouldn't that be

1192
01:20:01.600 --> 01:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>just uh, his historically unprecedented collapse.

1193
01:20:07.039 --> 01:20:11.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, Charles Haywood believes that with the way

1194
01:20:11.239 --> 01:20:14.720
<v Speaker 2>the regime is attacking Elon Musk, He said at the

1195
01:20:14.800 --> 01:20:17.560
<v Speaker 2>end of a recent podcast he did that he thought

1196
01:20:17.600 --> 01:20:22.520
<v Speaker 2>that Elon Musk may turn to basically creating his own

1197
01:20:22.520 --> 01:20:26.199
<v Speaker 2>private security force, which would be his own his own

1198
01:20:26.239 --> 01:20:26.880
<v Speaker 2>private army.

1199
01:20:27.720 --> 01:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but then again, like this is a fine this

1200
01:20:30.159 --> 01:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>would be uh. The the match point would be a

1201
01:20:33.600 --> 01:20:37.199
<v Speaker 1>financial collapse, which implies that the dollar doesn't really have

1202
01:20:37.239 --> 01:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>any value anymore. So now it just becomes like, you know,

1203
01:20:41.920 --> 01:20:44.039
<v Speaker 1>depending on how hard it is a barter system, who

1204
01:20:44.079 --> 01:20:46.319
<v Speaker 1>has the most assets to barter, who has the most

1205
01:20:46.479 --> 01:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>who has the most trade.

1206
01:20:47.640 --> 01:20:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, here's the thing is the people who are going

1207
01:20:51.680 --> 01:20:55.439
<v Speaker 2>to rule, the people who would roll after a after

1208
01:20:55.479 --> 01:20:57.640
<v Speaker 2>a collapse, or the people who've already been planning for

1209
01:20:57.680 --> 01:20:58.279
<v Speaker 2>the collapse.

1210
01:20:58.800 --> 01:20:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm.

1211
01:20:59.439 --> 01:21:06.000
<v Speaker 2>And I would assume that there are people already in

1212
01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:10.479
<v Speaker 2>in elite positions who have already have an idea of

1213
01:21:10.520 --> 01:21:13.239
<v Speaker 2>what a new currency would look like and things like that.

1214
01:21:13.439 --> 01:21:14.560
<v Speaker 2>So I mean, I think that's.

1215
01:21:14.479 --> 01:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Where it goes well for us. No, No, not at

1216
01:21:17.840 --> 01:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>all for my suburban asks.

1217
01:21:21.439 --> 01:21:25.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, these conclusions are bleak, and the Machiavelians saw

1218
01:21:25.640 --> 01:21:30.119
<v Speaker 2>little ground for hope of democratic emancipation. Modern democracy they

1219
01:21:30.159 --> 01:21:33.439
<v Speaker 2>interpreted as a special kind of disguised oligarchy based on

1220
01:21:33.520 --> 01:21:37.439
<v Speaker 2>commercial and industrial power, and not fundamentally different from early

1221
01:21:37.560 --> 01:21:43.159
<v Speaker 2>kinds of elitism. Mosca and Pareto in particular, saw socialism

1222
01:21:43.239 --> 01:21:46.079
<v Speaker 2>as no more than an illusion that threatens to subordinate

1223
01:21:46.159 --> 01:21:48.560
<v Speaker 2>all of society to an elite based on the power

1224
01:21:48.600 --> 01:21:53.279
<v Speaker 2>of the state. To Michelle's, oligarchy was an inherent part

1225
01:21:53.319 --> 01:21:58.000
<v Speaker 2>of social and political organization, a doctrine that was most

1226
01:21:58.000 --> 01:22:01.000
<v Speaker 2>common to most of the Machiavelians in which Burnham emphasized,

1227
01:22:01.119 --> 01:22:04.159
<v Speaker 2>was the concept of what Moscaw called the political formula

1228
01:22:04.760 --> 01:22:12.279
<v Speaker 2>Pereto called derivations and surrel called myths. According to these writers,

1229
01:22:12.479 --> 01:22:16.479
<v Speaker 2>elites do not hold power simply through force and intimidation.

1230
01:22:17.039 --> 01:22:22.560
<v Speaker 2>They formulate doctrines that rationalize or justify their control in logical, moral, theological,

1231
01:22:22.840 --> 01:22:29.399
<v Speaker 2>or philosophical terms. These doctrines political formulas, derivations or myths,

1232
01:22:29.600 --> 01:22:34.279
<v Speaker 2>or as Burnham called them in the Managerial Revolution, ideologies

1233
01:22:34.840 --> 01:22:39.560
<v Speaker 2>act as social and politically integrative forces, and are often

1234
01:22:39.640 --> 01:22:45.199
<v Speaker 2>quite sophisticated and complex in their structures. Most members of

1235
01:22:45.199 --> 01:22:48.840
<v Speaker 2>a society of a society, elites as well as non elites,

1236
01:22:49.119 --> 01:22:54.840
<v Speaker 2>believe them and to at least some extent, take them seriously. Nevertheless,

1237
01:22:55.199 --> 01:22:58.359
<v Speaker 2>I think less and less, don't you agree? Don't you

1238
01:22:58.399 --> 01:23:02.439
<v Speaker 2>think people I would say elites more so than any

1239
01:23:02.680 --> 01:23:05.079
<v Speaker 2>but I think more and more people even just walking

1240
01:23:05.119 --> 01:23:08.560
<v Speaker 2>around basically or just at the at the end of

1241
01:23:08.560 --> 01:23:10.960
<v Speaker 2>their rope, where they're just when it comes to ideologies

1242
01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:13.319
<v Speaker 2>and they're just like, I'm just got to take care

1243
01:23:13.359 --> 01:23:13.880
<v Speaker 2>of myself.

1244
01:23:15.079 --> 01:23:21.159
<v Speaker 1>I think what separates maybe our our side from the

1245
01:23:21.239 --> 01:23:24.239
<v Speaker 1>normies and from the other side is that, uh, we

1246
01:23:24.279 --> 01:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>don't view ideology as an ends. We view it as

1247
01:23:26.680 --> 01:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>a means. And uh that's that. I don't know, I

1248
01:23:31.399 --> 01:23:34.439
<v Speaker 1>got nothing else on that, but yeah, pretty much that's it.

1249
01:23:34.439 --> 01:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a mean, it's a means to it. It's a

1250
01:23:36.600 --> 01:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>means to an end, you know, pointing, pointing the masses

1251
01:23:39.359 --> 01:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>in a direction, propaganda, you know, channeling energy towards a

1252
01:23:44.720 --> 01:23:48.279
<v Speaker 1>certain outcome. That's that's all. Going towards a means to

1253
01:23:48.319 --> 01:23:51.279
<v Speaker 1>a desirable end that we would like or we hope happens,

1254
01:23:51.640 --> 01:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>or we hope to get somebody in there that can

1255
01:23:53.680 --> 01:23:56.079
<v Speaker 1>make it happen, you know, if they happened to if

1256
01:23:56.079 --> 01:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it happens to be of a particular ideology, like, it's

1257
01:24:00.199 --> 01:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>really of no consequence to us. Now, call it Christian nationalism,

1258
01:24:04.239 --> 01:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>call it fucking white nationalism, ethne whatever, like, as long

1259
01:24:08.560 --> 01:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>as most of our desired ends are going to be fulfilled,

1260
01:24:12.880 --> 01:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Like we know that we don't have the luxury to

1261
01:24:14.640 --> 01:24:15.279
<v Speaker 1>pick and choose.

1262
01:24:16.720 --> 01:24:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Most members of the society's elites as well as non elites,

1263
01:24:20.239 --> 01:24:24.159
<v Speaker 2>I believe them. Nevertheless, despite their sophistication and large number

1264
01:24:24.199 --> 01:24:27.319
<v Speaker 2>of adherents. These ideologies are not to be regarded as

1265
01:24:27.359 --> 01:24:31.039
<v Speaker 2>scientific in purpose or content. Their purpose is not to

1266
01:24:31.159 --> 01:24:33.720
<v Speaker 2>express or explain reality in a way that can be

1267
01:24:33.800 --> 01:24:37.399
<v Speaker 2>proved or disproved, but to provide a rationalization for the

1268
01:24:37.439 --> 01:24:41.800
<v Speaker 2>existence and power of the dominant minority. The fact that

1269
01:24:41.880 --> 01:24:46.079
<v Speaker 2>ideologies are not scientific, and that those who believe in

1270
01:24:46.119 --> 01:24:49.520
<v Speaker 2>them do so for non rational reasons means that it

1271
01:24:49.560 --> 01:24:54.000
<v Speaker 2>is useless to criticize ideologies in terms of verifiable facts

1272
01:24:54.399 --> 01:24:57.760
<v Speaker 2>or logic. All you have to do is just make

1273
01:24:57.800 --> 01:24:58.640
<v Speaker 2>fun of them.

1274
01:24:59.319 --> 01:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Mock them, yes, dehumanize other eyes, whatever you want to

1275
01:25:04.479 --> 01:25:06.239
<v Speaker 1>call it, I do it.

1276
01:25:06.359 --> 01:25:11.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Ideology is impervious to such criticism because belief in

1277
01:25:11.239 --> 01:25:14.279
<v Speaker 2>it is dependent on non rational factors such as self

1278
01:25:14.279 --> 01:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>interest or emotion. The fact that an elite itself usually

1279
01:25:19.399 --> 01:25:22.800
<v Speaker 2>believes in most or all of its own ideology also

1280
01:25:22.880 --> 01:25:25.760
<v Speaker 2>means that no elite can be entirely scientific in its

1281
01:25:25.800 --> 01:25:30.439
<v Speaker 2>own thinking and behavior. Any elite must always, to some extent,

1282
01:25:30.760 --> 01:25:35.039
<v Speaker 2>be the victim of its own myths. Burnham argued that

1283
01:25:35.039 --> 01:25:39.479
<v Speaker 2>the Machiabelians the Machiavelian science of power could provide a

1284
01:25:39.600 --> 01:25:43.079
<v Speaker 2>non ideological framework for an elite, but he was highly

1285
01:25:43.119 --> 01:25:47.199
<v Speaker 2>skeptical that any elite could for long make successful use

1286
01:25:47.239 --> 01:25:48.039
<v Speaker 2>of this science.

1287
01:25:50.199 --> 01:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good on his part, because I mean, when you

1288
01:25:52.960 --> 01:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>think of any great man that ever arose, it's exactly

1289
01:25:56.840 --> 01:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>what it said. They talk the talk as far as

1290
01:25:59.680 --> 01:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>ideolology goes. They may have even believed some of it.

1291
01:26:02.399 --> 01:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you'll take any great man and none of

1292
01:26:05.600 --> 01:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>them were pure, purely ideological in practice.

1293
01:26:08.880 --> 01:26:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, think about this, and I know people are

1294
01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:14.720
<v Speaker 2>probably sick of me bringing him up, but bout Kelly.

1295
01:26:15.840 --> 01:26:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I only know two things about bout Kelly. I know

1296
01:26:18.119 --> 01:26:21.720
<v Speaker 2>that he hates crime and crack down on it. And

1297
01:26:21.760 --> 01:26:25.000
<v Speaker 2>he likes bitcoin. Yeah, that's the only I mean.

1298
01:26:25.279 --> 01:26:29.039
<v Speaker 1>I know that he ideology, which is no great.

1299
01:26:28.960 --> 01:26:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so he doesn't. I don't know that he has

1300
01:26:31.359 --> 01:26:34.079
<v Speaker 2>an ideology. He first ran for president in a far

1301
01:26:34.199 --> 01:26:36.880
<v Speaker 2>left party, he got kicked out of that had to go,

1302
01:26:36.920 --> 01:26:41.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, bounced all around, you know it. All all

1303
01:26:41.479 --> 01:26:45.239
<v Speaker 2>I can judge him on is what he's done. Yeah,

1304
01:26:45.359 --> 01:26:48.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean he's kissed the wall. Yes, his

1305
01:26:48.199 --> 01:26:51.000
<v Speaker 2>his wife has some sephardic in her, Yes, Yeah, I

1306
01:26:51.039 --> 01:26:54.159
<v Speaker 2>know that that's that. That means that you're just waiting

1307
01:26:54.199 --> 01:26:56.960
<v Speaker 2>for the other shoe to drop. He's going to disappoint

1308
01:26:57.000 --> 01:26:59.760
<v Speaker 2>you because he did that. All I can judge him

1309
01:26:59.760 --> 01:27:01.760
<v Speaker 2>on is what he's done so far, and everything he's

1310
01:27:01.800 --> 01:27:03.439
<v Speaker 2>done so far looks pretty damn good to me.

1311
01:27:04.640 --> 01:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we don't. We don't have the luxury of having

1312
01:27:07.840 --> 01:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the expectation of even a somewhat pure great man that

1313
01:27:13.960 --> 01:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>comes and you know, sweeps, sweeps whatever this is away.

1314
01:27:17.199 --> 01:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>We know, like, like take Musk for example, he's probably

1315
01:27:20.159 --> 01:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the most likely candidate to fight the fight the current

1316
01:27:22.960 --> 01:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>regime and maybe went out. He's on the right track.

1317
01:27:27.119 --> 01:27:31.279
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, he's definitely not ideological. He wants

1318
01:27:31.319 --> 01:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to get to Mars, that's about it, and anything that

1319
01:27:33.920 --> 01:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>stands in between him and that goal needs to be

1320
01:27:36.840 --> 01:27:40.479
<v Speaker 1>swept away. That's that's not an ideology either.

1321
01:27:40.880 --> 01:27:44.880
<v Speaker 2>No, No, that's he has a goal. That's it's all right.

1322
01:27:46.760 --> 01:27:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Burnham and the Machiavelians tended to interpret all of social

1323
01:27:49.760 --> 01:27:53.119
<v Speaker 2>and political reality in terms of the doctrine of the elite.

1324
01:27:53.520 --> 01:27:56.960
<v Speaker 2>For them, the nature of the elite is largely determinative

1325
01:27:57.560 --> 01:28:02.880
<v Speaker 2>of other social, economic, political, and cultural institutions. Institutions that

1326
01:28:02.920 --> 01:28:05.680
<v Speaker 2>are not consistent with the perceived interests of an elite

1327
01:28:05.760 --> 01:28:09.840
<v Speaker 2>are abolished. Or discouraged, while those that are are or

1328
01:28:09.880 --> 01:28:13.680
<v Speaker 2>would be consistent with its perceived interests are created or promoted.

1329
01:28:14.079 --> 01:28:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Quoting from the quoting from the book. From the point

1330
01:28:18.840 --> 01:28:20.760
<v Speaker 2>of view of the theory of the ruling class, a

1331
01:28:20.840 --> 01:28:24.720
<v Speaker 2>society is the society of its ruling class. A nation's

1332
01:28:24.760 --> 01:28:30.720
<v Speaker 2>strengths or weaknesses, its cultures, its powers of endurance, its prosperity,

1333
01:28:30.760 --> 01:28:34.359
<v Speaker 2>its decadence depend in the first instance, upon the nature

1334
01:28:34.399 --> 01:28:38.359
<v Speaker 2>of its ruling elite. More particularly, the way in which

1335
01:28:38.399 --> 01:28:41.039
<v Speaker 2>to study a nation, to understand it, to predict what

1336
01:28:41.079 --> 01:28:44.239
<v Speaker 2>will happen to it, requires, first of all, and primarily,

1337
01:28:44.319 --> 01:28:48.600
<v Speaker 2>an analysis of the ruling class. Political history and political

1338
01:28:48.600 --> 01:28:52.399
<v Speaker 2>science are thus predominantly the history and science of ruling classes,

1339
01:28:52.600 --> 01:29:00.239
<v Speaker 2>their origin, development, composition, structure, and changes. The important that

1340
01:29:00.239 --> 01:29:03.960
<v Speaker 2>the Machiavelians attached to the elite or ruling class resembles

1341
01:29:04.119 --> 01:29:08.880
<v Speaker 2>and to a degree parallels Marx's emphasis on economic forces

1342
01:29:08.920 --> 01:29:13.399
<v Speaker 2>in interpreting history. Yet the Machiavelian theory of elite is

1343
01:29:13.399 --> 01:29:16.199
<v Speaker 2>a broader doctrine than that of Marx, and allows for

1344
01:29:16.239 --> 01:29:21.199
<v Speaker 2>consideration of non economic and non material forces in understanding

1345
01:29:21.239 --> 01:29:24.119
<v Speaker 2>men in history, far more than Marx did.

1346
01:29:24.800 --> 01:29:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah which is very difficult when you factor in all

1347
01:29:28.359 --> 01:29:32.399
<v Speaker 1>of the other, you know, non non scientific factors that

1348
01:29:32.479 --> 01:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>go into going to studying the history of a of

1349
01:29:37.960 --> 01:29:42.279
<v Speaker 1>a nation, a culture of people. You know, it gets

1350
01:29:42.359 --> 01:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>so far beyond dialectics. It's insane. It's hard. That's why,

1351
01:29:48.680 --> 01:29:51.359
<v Speaker 1>that's why predicting things is so fucking hard. There's too

1352
01:29:51.359 --> 01:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>many goddamn factors.

1353
01:29:54.520 --> 01:29:58.039
<v Speaker 2>Nevertheless, because Burnham and the Machiavelians saw politics in terms

1354
01:29:58.079 --> 01:30:00.520
<v Speaker 2>of a struggle for power, and the struggle for power

1355
01:30:00.600 --> 01:30:03.359
<v Speaker 2>was central to the nature of an elite and to

1356
01:30:03.520 --> 01:30:07.039
<v Speaker 2>all other social relationships, it would not be inaccurate to

1357
01:30:07.079 --> 01:30:12.079
<v Speaker 2>describe Machiavelianism as a kind of political determinism paralleling the

1358
01:30:12.119 --> 01:30:14.279
<v Speaker 2>economic determinism of Marx.

1359
01:30:16.119 --> 01:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you this, do you think there was

1360
01:30:18.079 --> 01:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>really a struggle for power? You know, I think I

1361
01:30:22.760 --> 01:30:27.199
<v Speaker 1>think it's roundly agreed circuit. Somewhere around twenty twelve is

1362
01:30:27.239 --> 01:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>when we kind of had this turning point into what

1363
01:30:29.560 --> 01:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we have now, which is just like gay trans Soviet Russia.

1364
01:30:34.319 --> 01:30:38.399
<v Speaker 1>But before that, I mean, we told there's been a

1365
01:30:38.439 --> 01:30:41.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of talk about how great the nineties was and

1366
01:30:41.640 --> 01:30:48.439
<v Speaker 1>how you know, how basically unified we were, how basically

1367
01:30:48.880 --> 01:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>free and prosperous we were, and how happy we were.

1368
01:30:54.000 --> 01:30:56.239
<v Speaker 1>I think there's something to that. The culture was definitely

1369
01:30:56.239 --> 01:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>different the ruling class. Do you think the ruling class

1370
01:31:00.159 --> 01:31:03.399
<v Speaker 1>was different then? And then we had maybe not even

1371
01:31:03.439 --> 01:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a struggle that got us to where we are now,

1372
01:31:06.640 --> 01:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of defined the nature of why they're

1373
01:31:08.600 --> 01:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>so incompetent because they didn't have to struggle for it.

1374
01:31:11.239 --> 01:31:13.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think Thomas makes a really good point about

1375
01:31:13.319 --> 01:31:16.920
<v Speaker 2>the early nineties, is the nineties, especially the first half

1376
01:31:16.920 --> 01:31:19.319
<v Speaker 2>of the nineties, is that it was it was kind

1377
01:31:19.319 --> 01:31:25.239
<v Speaker 2>of anarchy. There was and you know, I know that

1378
01:31:25.720 --> 01:31:28.560
<v Speaker 2>the anarchists watching, they want me to make an argument

1379
01:31:28.600 --> 01:31:31.960
<v Speaker 2>that anarchy's good because it means without rulers. That's what

1380
01:31:33.079 --> 01:31:35.079
<v Speaker 2>it means, without rulers.

1381
01:31:35.079 --> 01:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Shut the fuck up, you know, we mean the normal Yeah.

1382
01:31:37.640 --> 01:31:41.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we mean the definition that everybody agrees upon. Oh

1383
01:31:41.039 --> 01:31:45.800
<v Speaker 2>but that's democracy. Yeah, go fuck your mother. I mean

1384
01:31:46.079 --> 01:31:49.359
<v Speaker 2>people getting the amount of crime people get. I mean,

1385
01:31:49.359 --> 01:31:54.880
<v Speaker 2>there's a reason why basically Juliani had to unleash an

1386
01:31:54.960 --> 01:31:57.199
<v Speaker 2>army onto the streets to stop crime in New York.

1387
01:31:58.520 --> 01:32:02.640
<v Speaker 2>It had reached And here's the thing. The people who

1388
01:32:02.760 --> 01:32:06.760
<v Speaker 2>talk about the nineties being this great. They're usually leftists,

1389
01:32:07.159 --> 01:32:09.760
<v Speaker 2>they're usually people from the left side. Well, why was

1390
01:32:09.800 --> 01:32:12.039
<v Speaker 2>the nineties great? Because they could get away with doing

1391
01:32:12.119 --> 01:32:14.680
<v Speaker 2>all the degenerate shit that they wanted to. They weren't

1392
01:32:14.760 --> 01:32:17.439
<v Speaker 2>judged for it. It was fine. I mean, I knew

1393
01:32:17.439 --> 01:32:21.119
<v Speaker 2>people who, yeah.

1394
01:32:20.479 --> 01:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>It was live and let live, but also live and

1395
01:32:22.720 --> 01:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>let live to like to be, you know, kind of

1396
01:32:26.920 --> 01:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of more on the right than you are allowed

1397
01:32:29.000 --> 01:32:29.439
<v Speaker 1>to be now.

1398
01:32:29.560 --> 01:32:33.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, and not even that, because you think about the

1399
01:32:33.319 --> 01:32:36.159
<v Speaker 2>pat Con movement where they would go. They were going

1400
01:32:36.199 --> 01:32:38.680
<v Speaker 2>after right wing militia groups and you know, they don't

1401
01:32:38.680 --> 01:32:40.880
<v Speaker 2>even talk about that, like half of those militia groups

1402
01:32:40.880 --> 01:32:42.239
<v Speaker 2>that they took down that black.

1403
01:32:42.239 --> 01:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Still you still couldn't be that far to that it's

1404
01:32:44.000 --> 01:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>still illegal to be that far to the right. But

1405
01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, you could call your friend a fag, or

1406
01:32:48.680 --> 01:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you could like, you know, you could say the N

1407
01:32:50.920 --> 01:32:53.279
<v Speaker 1>word and nobody would like, nobody would freak out about

1408
01:32:53.319 --> 01:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it amongst your peer group. Now, not so much, I.

1409
01:32:56.479 --> 01:32:59.479
<v Speaker 2>Mean, but it was, it was. It was heaven for

1410
01:32:59.840 --> 01:33:02.520
<v Speaker 2>so one like James Lindsay, he got away with doing

1411
01:33:02.600 --> 01:33:05.439
<v Speaker 2>all the degenerate shit he wanted to, and far right

1412
01:33:05.479 --> 01:33:07.000
<v Speaker 2>wingers were being cracked down upon.

1413
01:33:07.880 --> 01:33:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yep. And the other question I have is do

1414
01:33:11.319 --> 01:33:14.119
<v Speaker 1>you think that would be the defining factor of say

1415
01:33:14.359 --> 01:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the eighties Reagan years into the nineties, was the switch

1416
01:33:18.640 --> 01:33:22.199
<v Speaker 1>between tough on crime and then you know, prison and

1417
01:33:22.479 --> 01:33:28.359
<v Speaker 1>mandatory minimum sentencing, prison reform, mandatory minimum sentencing, this transfer

1418
01:33:28.439 --> 01:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>over to a softer approach, a more I don't know,

1419
01:33:32.199 --> 01:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>socially informed approach.

1420
01:33:35.960 --> 01:33:37.880
<v Speaker 2>It's hard for me to say that. You know, in

1421
01:33:37.920 --> 01:33:41.239
<v Speaker 2>the eighties, I was not That wasn't something that I

1422
01:33:41.279 --> 01:33:44.000
<v Speaker 2>would have been able to really pay attention to. I

1423
01:33:44.039 --> 01:33:47.399
<v Speaker 2>have to think about history, and you know, I'm not

1424
01:33:47.439 --> 01:33:51.079
<v Speaker 2>going to be able to give a personal a personal

1425
01:33:51.279 --> 01:33:56.239
<v Speaker 2>opinion on that. But I mean, really the problem in

1426
01:33:56.279 --> 01:33:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the eighties was I mean, it was just the crime

1427
01:33:58.720 --> 01:34:03.319
<v Speaker 2>was insane and it was just so matter of fact.

1428
01:34:04.840 --> 01:34:07.399
<v Speaker 2>It's just you accepted the fact that there was all

1429
01:34:07.439 --> 01:34:10.239
<v Speaker 2>this crime going on, and it's not like now where

1430
01:34:10.319 --> 01:34:13.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, you have social media. Everybody's like, look, you

1431
01:34:13.239 --> 01:34:16.199
<v Speaker 2>got these Soros DA's and they can go out and

1432
01:34:16.199 --> 01:34:18.239
<v Speaker 2>commit crime all they want. If you try and stop them,

1433
01:34:18.279 --> 01:34:20.680
<v Speaker 2>you go to jail. You know, you have people who

1434
01:34:22.119 --> 01:34:24.840
<v Speaker 2>put up flyers who get two years in jail, someone

1435
01:34:24.920 --> 01:34:27.319
<v Speaker 2>rapes a twelve year old, they get, you know, fifteen

1436
01:34:27.359 --> 01:34:32.640
<v Speaker 2>months probation. You can talk more about that now it's

1437
01:34:32.840 --> 01:34:35.039
<v Speaker 2>you can learn more about it because of social media,

1438
01:34:35.119 --> 01:34:37.760
<v Speaker 2>but back then it was, you know, harder. You'd really

1439
01:34:37.800 --> 01:34:39.439
<v Speaker 2>just have to go back into books and study the

1440
01:34:39.520 --> 01:34:42.239
<v Speaker 2>history on that. But yeah, I can't really, I can't

1441
01:34:42.279 --> 01:34:45.479
<v Speaker 2>really answer that question properly. But you know, being an

1442
01:34:45.479 --> 01:34:47.960
<v Speaker 2>adult in the nineties and living through the nineties, Yeah, man,

1443
01:34:47.960 --> 01:34:51.119
<v Speaker 2>I knew people who were you know, odeed, killed themselves,

1444
01:34:51.560 --> 01:34:55.039
<v Speaker 2>got hung up on got hung up on on oxy

1445
01:34:55.199 --> 01:34:57.439
<v Speaker 2>really early. I knew people got hung up on meth

1446
01:34:57.600 --> 01:35:01.119
<v Speaker 2>real early on in the in the whole game, you know,

1447
01:35:01.159 --> 01:35:03.880
<v Speaker 2>I knew people in I mean from when I was

1448
01:35:03.920 --> 01:35:07.960
<v Speaker 2>a kid. I knew people like my dad worked with

1449
01:35:08.159 --> 01:35:12.520
<v Speaker 2>the guy whose wife was the first recorded crack victim

1450
01:35:12.520 --> 01:35:13.319
<v Speaker 2>in New York City.

1451
01:35:14.079 --> 01:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, yeah huh.

1452
01:35:15.560 --> 01:35:17.520
<v Speaker 2>And they were white.

1453
01:35:17.920 --> 01:35:18.199
<v Speaker 1>Huh.

1454
01:35:18.560 --> 01:35:21.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, so it is.

1455
01:35:21.239 --> 01:35:25.840
<v Speaker 1>It is pretty great, all right.

1456
01:35:27.439 --> 01:35:29.720
<v Speaker 2>It should also be understood that Burnam and his mentors

1457
01:35:29.760 --> 01:35:32.960
<v Speaker 2>were not arguing for elitism in the sense of aristocracy.

1458
01:35:33.439 --> 01:35:35.880
<v Speaker 2>They were not arguing that elites should rule the majority

1459
01:35:35.920 --> 01:35:40.000
<v Speaker 2>because their members are better, more virtuous stronger, more intelligent,

1460
01:35:40.119 --> 01:35:42.520
<v Speaker 2>or wiser than most men. They were arguing for the

1461
01:35:42.560 --> 01:35:48.479
<v Speaker 2>sociological inevitability of minority domination, for the impossibility of majority rule,

1462
01:35:48.880 --> 01:35:52.479
<v Speaker 2>and democracy in any literal or meaningful sense. I mean

1463
01:35:52.560 --> 01:35:56.439
<v Speaker 2>democracy now. To me, when people ask me what democracy means, now,

1464
01:35:56.840 --> 01:36:03.840
<v Speaker 2>I just tell them either whatever the region is pushing, sodomy, transgenderism,

1465
01:36:03.880 --> 01:36:05.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's basically what democracy is.

1466
01:36:06.479 --> 01:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And it's it's great to see, you know, the

1467
01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the inherent contradictions between democracy and liberalism kind of play

1468
01:36:14.800 --> 01:36:20.159
<v Speaker 1>itself out on the left, especially with this uh, Palestine

1469
01:36:20.239 --> 01:36:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Israel thing going on. It's you could if you view

1470
01:36:24.239 --> 01:36:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it through that lens, democracy versus liberalism. It's it's just

1471
01:36:28.880 --> 01:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>amazing to see, and it's only going to get better.

1472
01:36:32.960 --> 01:36:36.239
<v Speaker 2>The fact of oligarchy, they argued, was founded on an

1473
01:36:36.239 --> 01:36:40.079
<v Speaker 2>empirical and comparative study of history, on the biological and

1474
01:36:40.119 --> 01:36:43.560
<v Speaker 2>psychological realities of human beings and on the nature of

1475
01:36:43.640 --> 01:36:47.319
<v Speaker 2>human society societies. It was a fact that could be

1476
01:36:47.399 --> 01:36:51.840
<v Speaker 2>neither ignored nor altered, and moral approbation or criticism of

1477
01:36:51.880 --> 01:36:56.039
<v Speaker 2>the fact of oligarchy is irrelevant to its truth. Yet,

1478
01:36:56.079 --> 01:36:59.119
<v Speaker 2>elites are not permanent, and the laws that govern the

1479
01:36:59.199 --> 01:37:01.279
<v Speaker 2>change and the company position and the rise and fall

1480
01:37:01.319 --> 01:37:03.840
<v Speaker 2>of elites were an important theme for Burnham and for

1481
01:37:04.039 --> 01:37:08.039
<v Speaker 2>Mosca and Pereto, to whom he devoted most attention. Mosca

1482
01:37:08.119 --> 01:37:11.720
<v Speaker 2>had recognized in all elites and aristocratic tendency by which

1483
01:37:11.760 --> 01:37:15.920
<v Speaker 2>they tend to restrict or encourage entrance to or exit

1484
01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:16.880
<v Speaker 2>from their ranks.

1485
01:37:18.039 --> 01:37:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's another battleground. Is everybody wants to be

1486
01:37:23.920 --> 01:37:27.399
<v Speaker 1>everybody wants. Everybody's chasing status. That's why you have people

1487
01:37:27.439 --> 01:37:29.399
<v Speaker 1>going into two hundred thousand dollars in debt to go

1488
01:37:29.479 --> 01:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to Harvard. That's so that they can have that degree

1489
01:37:31.960 --> 01:37:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and enter the ranks of the elite, or at least

1490
01:37:35.039 --> 01:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the near group of the elite. And it's it's going

1491
01:37:38.720 --> 01:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to be really funny if we have a collapse.

1492
01:37:44.520 --> 01:37:48.880
<v Speaker 2>When the restrictive aristocratic tendency is predominant, society is stable

1493
01:37:48.960 --> 01:37:53.039
<v Speaker 2>and may begin to stagnate. When the democratic tendency is predominant,

1494
01:37:53.079 --> 01:37:57.479
<v Speaker 2>society is in flux, with many innovations, social and political crises,

1495
01:37:58.239 --> 01:38:02.520
<v Speaker 2>cultural ferment and perhaps disorder, chaos and revolution.

1496
01:38:03.359 --> 01:38:07.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Speaking of the transition between the nineties to the

1497
01:38:07.079 --> 01:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>early aughts.

1498
01:38:09.840 --> 01:38:13.279
<v Speaker 2>Parretto himself went further and developed a psychology of elites

1499
01:38:13.359 --> 01:38:15.000
<v Speaker 2>that is at the root of his theory of the

1500
01:38:15.039 --> 01:38:21.359
<v Speaker 2>circulation of elites. Parreto distinguished between derivations of ideologies and residues,

1501
01:38:21.600 --> 01:38:27.399
<v Speaker 2>which are constant universal psychological instincts or impulses. Among the

1502
01:38:27.439 --> 01:38:30.560
<v Speaker 2>six classes of residues that Parreto recognized, the two most

1503
01:38:30.600 --> 01:38:34.800
<v Speaker 2>important were those of class one, the instinct for combinations.

1504
01:38:35.039 --> 01:38:39.560
<v Speaker 2>In class two, group preference, group persistence.

1505
01:38:39.720 --> 01:38:42.399
<v Speaker 1>And then there's four more. And that's why I couldn't

1506
01:38:42.439 --> 01:38:43.479
<v Speaker 1>read Parreto.

1507
01:38:44.840 --> 01:38:49.319
<v Speaker 2>If you read AA's book on the one I read

1508
01:38:49.359 --> 01:38:53.079
<v Speaker 2>on the Populist Delusion, he does a really good job

1509
01:38:53.119 --> 01:38:56.359
<v Speaker 2>of summing it all up very fast, ya, in a

1510
01:38:56.439 --> 01:39:01.760
<v Speaker 2>very short in very short chapters. These were excellent. Yeah, yeah,

1511
01:39:02.039 --> 01:39:07.720
<v Speaker 2>it's a great book. I'm retarding these residues. Pereto specifically

1512
01:39:07.720 --> 01:39:11.479
<v Speaker 2>correlated with Machiavelli's distinction between the fox and the lion

1513
01:39:11.520 --> 01:39:14.840
<v Speaker 2>among rulers. Just as a ruler who's a fox relies

1514
01:39:14.840 --> 01:39:19.159
<v Speaker 2>on cunning, deceit, and verbal and intellectual skills, elites whose

1515
01:39:19.199 --> 01:39:22.560
<v Speaker 2>members are driven by class one residues tend to synthesize

1516
01:39:22.680 --> 01:39:27.920
<v Speaker 2>arbitrary elements of their experience. Class one residues include behavioral

1517
01:39:27.960 --> 01:39:32.159
<v Speaker 2>patterns such as those of magic, philosophical system making, and

1518
01:39:32.319 --> 01:39:39.800
<v Speaker 2>financial manipulation. Elites that contain primarily verbalists, intellectuals, and administrators

1519
01:39:40.039 --> 01:39:43.600
<v Speaker 2>will exhibit a high proportion of class one residues and

1520
01:39:43.680 --> 01:39:46.680
<v Speaker 2>will try to preserve their own power and resolve problems

1521
01:39:46.720 --> 01:39:51.640
<v Speaker 2>through verbal, administrative, and manipulative behavior rather than through the

1522
01:39:51.800 --> 01:39:58.279
<v Speaker 2>use of force. They thus correspond to Machiavelli's foxes. Quoting

1523
01:39:58.680 --> 01:40:03.119
<v Speaker 2>from the book Machiavellians, they live by their wits. They

1524
01:40:03.119 --> 01:40:06.560
<v Speaker 2>put their reliance on fraud, deceit, and shrewdness. They do

1525
01:40:06.640 --> 01:40:10.079
<v Speaker 2>not have strong attachment to family, church, nation, and traditions.

1526
01:40:10.479 --> 01:40:13.319
<v Speaker 2>They live in the present, taking little thought of the future,

1527
01:40:13.560 --> 01:40:17.159
<v Speaker 2>and are always ready for change, novelty, and adventure. They

1528
01:40:17.159 --> 01:40:19.880
<v Speaker 2>are not adept as a rule in the use of force.

1529
01:40:20.279 --> 01:40:25.399
<v Speaker 2>They are inventive and chance taking. Well, yep, we'll talk

1530
01:40:25.399 --> 01:40:26.960
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about that for in a second.

1531
01:40:27.560 --> 01:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I remember an episode from way back where I forget

1532
01:40:30.680 --> 01:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>if it was you or your guest, implied that we

1533
01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:37.119
<v Speaker 1>are our elites are entirely comprised of foxes. There are

1534
01:40:37.239 --> 01:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>no lions, and maybe it was Trump. Maybe it's a lawn,

1535
01:40:41.479 --> 01:40:44.760
<v Speaker 1>but they're definitely they're they're the lions right now, the

1536
01:40:44.840 --> 01:40:46.199
<v Speaker 1>only two. Right.

1537
01:40:46.279 --> 01:40:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean you do have the people in power

1538
01:40:50.039 --> 01:40:55.960
<v Speaker 2>now who are using force. I mean, yeah, true, so Biden,

1539
01:40:56.359 --> 01:40:58.760
<v Speaker 2>it's so pretty soft. Yeah well, I mean you're throwing

1540
01:40:58.800 --> 01:41:02.119
<v Speaker 2>people in jail, and that's you're destroying people's lives, in

1541
01:41:02.159 --> 01:41:05.640
<v Speaker 2>their livelihood and everything. A lot of people would rather

1542
01:41:05.680 --> 01:41:10.920
<v Speaker 2>be dead than have that happened to them. But the

1543
01:41:11.520 --> 01:41:14.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, you have to wonder what stage in civilization,

1544
01:41:14.760 --> 01:41:19.880
<v Speaker 2>what stage in what stage in elite theory you are

1545
01:41:20.640 --> 01:41:23.159
<v Speaker 2>when the foxes start to use.

1546
01:41:25.880 --> 01:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean I guess, you know, exiting the

1547
01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:36.880
<v Speaker 1>animal analogy, it's when they're sufficiently threatened or when they're

1548
01:41:36.920 --> 01:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>sufficiently fragile.

1549
01:41:38.840 --> 01:41:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a fragility more than anything.

1550
01:41:41.319 --> 01:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1551
01:41:42.359 --> 01:41:45.920
<v Speaker 2>The residues of class two group persistence correspond to the

1552
01:41:45.960 --> 01:41:49.319
<v Speaker 2>lions of Machiavelli. For those who exhibit a high proportion

1553
01:41:49.399 --> 01:41:54.079
<v Speaker 2>of class two residues quoting are able and ready to

1554
01:41:54.239 --> 01:41:57.399
<v Speaker 2>use force, relying on it rather than brains to solve

1555
01:41:57.439 --> 01:42:02.439
<v Speaker 2>their problems. They are conservative, patriarch loyalty tradition, and solidly

1556
01:42:02.520 --> 01:42:06.319
<v Speaker 2>tend super individual groups like family or church or nation,

1557
01:42:07.439 --> 01:42:08.680
<v Speaker 2>where are these people.

1558
01:42:09.199 --> 01:42:12.079
<v Speaker 1>I know who's going to cut the Gordian knot please.

1559
01:42:14.520 --> 01:42:15.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know who these people are.

1560
01:42:18.239 --> 01:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I've heard about them from Class two.

1561
01:42:20.520 --> 01:42:24.199
<v Speaker 2>Revenues or psychic forces that tend to sustain and perpetuate

1562
01:42:24.319 --> 01:42:29.079
<v Speaker 2>existing combinations. They are sociologically conservative, while those of Class

1563
01:42:29.119 --> 01:42:34.800
<v Speaker 2>one are sociologically innovative. That's an interesting word. A healthy elite,

1564
01:42:34.880 --> 01:42:38.359
<v Speaker 2>according to Pereto, will have an equilibrium in the distribution

1565
01:42:38.439 --> 01:42:41.920
<v Speaker 2>of these psychic types within it, but under certain conditions

1566
01:42:41.920 --> 01:42:46.239
<v Speaker 2>an imbalance will result. That's what we're seeing now. That's

1567
01:42:46.279 --> 01:42:49.079
<v Speaker 2>what that's that's what it is now because the ones

1568
01:42:49.119 --> 01:42:52.319
<v Speaker 2>who would be the ones who would commit violence would

1569
01:42:52.359 --> 01:42:54.399
<v Speaker 2>be the lions, and they have no lions.

1570
01:42:55.359 --> 01:43:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's all foxes, yep. If the wall and seeing what.

1571
01:43:01.000 --> 01:43:05.760
<v Speaker 2>See basically, Yeah, If too many Class two residues accrew

1572
01:43:05.920 --> 01:43:08.800
<v Speaker 2>in the elite, it will rely excessively on force and

1573
01:43:08.880 --> 01:43:13.279
<v Speaker 2>will fail to innovate and adapt to changing circumstances and challenges.

1574
01:43:13.800 --> 01:43:16.720
<v Speaker 2>If too many Class one types come to predominate, as

1575
01:43:16.720 --> 01:43:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Peretto believes was happening in the late nineteenth century, the

1576
01:43:19.920 --> 01:43:24.119
<v Speaker 2>elite and its society will become soft, unstable, corrupt, and disorderly,

1577
01:43:24.439 --> 01:43:27.439
<v Speaker 2>although the society may produce a very high level of

1578
01:43:27.520 --> 01:43:33.079
<v Speaker 2>cultural expression. Oh now saying that. Worst of all, however,

1579
01:43:33.239 --> 01:43:36.279
<v Speaker 2>the society will be unwilling and unable to use force

1580
01:43:36.319 --> 01:43:39.960
<v Speaker 2>to protect itself from either internal external challenges.

1581
01:43:41.359 --> 01:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, I don't think we're anywhere like that.

1582
01:43:44.359 --> 01:43:49.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, that's yeah, this, that's not here. While the

1583
01:43:49.079 --> 01:43:52.239
<v Speaker 2>foxes of class one predominate in the elite, the lions

1584
01:43:52.279 --> 01:43:55.359
<v Speaker 2>of class two are concentrated in the non elite and

1585
01:43:55.399 --> 01:43:58.199
<v Speaker 2>may use force against the foxes in rebellion and other

1586
01:43:58.279 --> 01:44:02.880
<v Speaker 2>forms of violence. External enemies may also commit aggression against

1587
01:44:02.880 --> 01:44:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the societies ruled by foxes, and in any case, because

1588
01:44:06.520 --> 01:44:10.279
<v Speaker 2>of the lack of qualities of group persistence, a society

1589
01:44:10.359 --> 01:44:13.640
<v Speaker 2>led by class one types will have few psychic resources

1590
01:44:13.640 --> 01:44:16.159
<v Speaker 2>for mustering endurance and sacrifice.

1591
01:44:16.640 --> 01:44:21.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that, there's no energy to direct in any type

1592
01:44:21.039 --> 01:44:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of revolutionary social change.

1593
01:44:25.239 --> 01:44:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Elites that are imbalanced by too many class one or

1594
01:44:27.840 --> 01:44:30.560
<v Speaker 2>class two residues are unstable and are likely to be

1595
01:44:30.640 --> 01:44:34.039
<v Speaker 2>overthrown or replaced. They tend to create the conditions that

1596
01:44:34.159 --> 01:44:36.960
<v Speaker 2>lead to their fall from power. The rise and fall

1597
01:44:37.000 --> 01:44:40.159
<v Speaker 2>of elites and changes in their composition Pereto called the

1598
01:44:40.199 --> 01:44:44.840
<v Speaker 2>circulation of elites. Normally, a healthy elite will be in

1599
01:44:44.920 --> 01:44:49.359
<v Speaker 2>continual but slow circulation, admitting new members and expelling or

1600
01:44:49.399 --> 01:44:54.199
<v Speaker 2>ostracizing old and decament elements. When the circulation occurs too rapidly,

1601
01:44:54.319 --> 01:44:57.600
<v Speaker 2>or when one elite is suddenly and entirely replaced by another,

1602
01:44:58.079 --> 01:45:01.840
<v Speaker 2>the result is revolution the theory of.

1603
01:45:01.920 --> 01:45:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess that.

1604
01:45:02.920 --> 01:45:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1605
01:45:03.760 --> 01:45:06.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, before this, I'd never heard it placed that way.

1606
01:45:06.279 --> 01:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I've I've heard a lot of explanations for what constitutes

1607
01:45:09.000 --> 01:45:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and what causes revolutionary social change. But I mean, I

1608
01:45:13.640 --> 01:45:16.800
<v Speaker 1>guess you can. You can explain it in many different

1609
01:45:16.800 --> 01:45:20.039
<v Speaker 1>ways and still come out with the same no right answer.

1610
01:45:20.920 --> 01:45:23.479
<v Speaker 2>I think what we may be seeing now, and this

1611
01:45:23.600 --> 01:45:26.560
<v Speaker 2>isn't an original idea. I don't remember who maybe heard

1612
01:45:26.560 --> 01:45:30.680
<v Speaker 2>it from Orrin, is you have an overproduction of elites

1613
01:45:31.760 --> 01:45:36.520
<v Speaker 2>because and I would say it's because the money supply

1614
01:45:36.600 --> 01:45:41.319
<v Speaker 2>has been increased and expanded so far that you have

1615
01:45:41.479 --> 01:45:46.119
<v Speaker 2>so many people that have acquired insane amounts of wealth. Yeah,

1616
01:45:46.119 --> 01:45:49.520
<v Speaker 2>and they basically become elites, but they are not the

1617
01:45:49.640 --> 01:45:53.319
<v Speaker 2>kind of They're not impressive at all. There. You know,

1618
01:45:53.439 --> 01:45:56.800
<v Speaker 2>if you have too much of something, if you have

1619
01:45:56.960 --> 01:45:59.319
<v Speaker 2>if you produce too much of something, and it happens

1620
01:45:59.359 --> 01:46:01.640
<v Speaker 2>too fast. You know a lot of times you're just

1621
01:46:01.680 --> 01:46:03.279
<v Speaker 2>going to have defects all over the place.

1622
01:46:04.039 --> 01:46:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if everybody's an elite, then nobody's an elite, and

1623
01:46:07.560 --> 01:46:08.399
<v Speaker 1>you go from there.

1624
01:46:12.359 --> 01:46:15.199
<v Speaker 2>The theory of elites, as developed by Moscow and Pareto

1625
01:46:15.520 --> 01:46:19.520
<v Speaker 2>and endorsement expounded by Burnham, was by no means an

1626
01:46:19.640 --> 01:46:22.600
<v Speaker 2>argument for the monopolization of power and privilege by an

1627
01:46:22.680 --> 01:46:27.439
<v Speaker 2>established few. Indeed, Mosca and Pareto were emphatic that healthy

1628
01:46:27.439 --> 01:46:31.039
<v Speaker 2>elites should alter in composition slowly and regularly, and that

1629
01:46:31.119 --> 01:46:37.119
<v Speaker 2>they should not become homogeneous or monolithic. Mosca, in particular,

1630
01:46:37.159 --> 01:46:39.359
<v Speaker 2>as well done these points and developed a method that

1631
01:46:39.399 --> 01:46:43.479
<v Speaker 2>went beyond the descriptive analysis of Machiavelianism to a normative

1632
01:46:43.520 --> 01:46:47.119
<v Speaker 2>mode of analysis by which elites and the societies they

1633
01:46:47.239 --> 01:46:52.680
<v Speaker 2>ruled could be evaluated. Although the rule of elites unelected

1634
01:46:52.680 --> 01:46:57.159
<v Speaker 2>and unrepresentative is inevitable, Mosca argued that the internal structure

1635
01:46:57.199 --> 01:47:01.600
<v Speaker 2>of elites is an important means of distinguishing them. All societies,

1636
01:47:01.640 --> 01:47:06.039
<v Speaker 2>according to Mosca, are composed of contending social forces, groups

1637
01:47:06.039 --> 01:47:13.199
<v Speaker 2>that have interests and values associated with particular kinds of activities, agriculture, industry, education, religion,

1638
01:47:13.479 --> 01:47:17.399
<v Speaker 2>the army, et cetera. Within these social forces, there are

1639
01:47:17.479 --> 01:47:23.520
<v Speaker 2>hierarchies and differentiations of power, wealth, merit, or geographical locations.

1640
01:47:23.880 --> 01:47:27.000
<v Speaker 2>The most significant social forces become part of the elite

1641
01:47:27.039 --> 01:47:30.199
<v Speaker 2>and pursue their particular interests and values within it.

1642
01:47:31.560 --> 01:47:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess to a degree. I don't know if

1643
01:47:34.279 --> 01:47:41.319
<v Speaker 1>that's particularly applicable now, but yeah, well, yeah, there are

1644
01:47:41.960 --> 01:47:45.079
<v Speaker 1>the hierarchies have been flattened so much because, like you said,

1645
01:47:45.079 --> 01:47:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we're over manufacturing. I mean, other than like you know,

1646
01:47:49.680 --> 01:47:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the top levels of the state or the deep state

1647
01:47:52.039 --> 01:47:57.039
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, or or the illuminati, like you know, the

1648
01:47:58.920 --> 01:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>everything below that is pretty much there's not a whole

1649
01:48:01.680 --> 01:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of difference other than what industry they're in or

1650
01:48:06.079 --> 01:48:10.479
<v Speaker 1>geographic location. That there's not really a whole lot of

1651
01:48:10.520 --> 01:48:12.079
<v Speaker 1>difference in what defines them.

1652
01:48:14.640 --> 01:48:17.840
<v Speaker 2>When, according to Mosca, there is a multiplicity of independent

1653
01:48:17.920 --> 01:48:20.960
<v Speaker 2>social forces within the elite or ruling class, such that

1654
01:48:21.119 --> 01:48:24.199
<v Speaker 2>no one force has sufficient power to exclude or exploit

1655
01:48:24.239 --> 01:48:28.960
<v Speaker 2>the others, then a de facto condition of juridical defense obtains.

1656
01:48:29.960 --> 01:48:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Mosca's concept of juridical defense is approximate to what is

1657
01:48:33.600 --> 01:48:37.640
<v Speaker 2>more generally known as the rule of law. Because of

1658
01:48:37.680 --> 01:48:41.279
<v Speaker 2>the mutually balancing and restraining action of the social forces

1659
01:48:41.319 --> 01:48:44.439
<v Speaker 2>in the ruling class, no single force or faction can

1660
01:48:44.479 --> 01:48:50.800
<v Speaker 2>accumulate or exercise arbitrary irregular power. Each social force and

1661
01:48:50.840 --> 01:48:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the groups and individuals composing or attached to it, protects

1662
01:48:54.680 --> 01:48:58.640
<v Speaker 2>itself from exploitation by the checking power it holds against

1663
01:48:58.640 --> 01:49:03.439
<v Speaker 2>the others. Even though this system of socio political checks

1664
01:49:03.800 --> 01:49:08.039
<v Speaker 2>may not be formally reorganized in recognized in law, it

1665
01:49:08.079 --> 01:49:12.159
<v Speaker 2>can still exist and be a substantive restraint on tyrannical power.

1666
01:49:13.079 --> 01:49:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there is kind of a parallel rule book for

1667
01:49:16.279 --> 01:49:19.119
<v Speaker 1>when you hit a certain amount of asset value.

1668
01:49:20.560 --> 01:49:24.359
<v Speaker 2>Mosca's concept of juridical defense owed much to both Machiavelli

1669
01:49:24.399 --> 01:49:27.039
<v Speaker 2>and Montesque, as well as to the exponents of the

1670
01:49:27.079 --> 01:49:32.279
<v Speaker 2>classical theory of the mixed constitution. Unlike Montisque, however, Mosca

1671
01:49:32.399 --> 01:49:34.840
<v Speaker 2>did not limit his idea of checks and balances to

1672
01:49:34.880 --> 01:49:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the formal and legalistic component of the government, but extended

1673
01:49:38.520 --> 01:49:42.600
<v Speaker 2>it to the substantial, concrete or real component social forces

1674
01:49:42.880 --> 01:49:44.319
<v Speaker 2>within a ruling class.

1675
01:49:45.119 --> 01:49:47.479
<v Speaker 1>So that's another thing I see, and I don't know

1676
01:49:47.560 --> 01:49:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to the degree that it affects you know, really rich

1677
01:49:50.600 --> 01:49:55.560
<v Speaker 1>people that we would probably call elite. But the what

1678
01:49:55.720 --> 01:49:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is it the mixed constitution idea where you have you

1679
01:49:58.880 --> 01:50:01.159
<v Speaker 1>have the rule of law, but there's also other rules

1680
01:50:01.199 --> 01:50:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that everybody kind of agrees to follow. That has been

1681
01:50:05.720 --> 01:50:09.880
<v Speaker 1>just withering away on the vine on purpose. Everything is

1682
01:50:09.960 --> 01:50:16.720
<v Speaker 1>legalistic now, everything is everything has to be codified into

1683
01:50:17.000 --> 01:50:20.760
<v Speaker 1>an employee handbook or an HR department or something like that.

1684
01:50:20.840 --> 01:50:23.319
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a function of just managerialism.

1685
01:50:23.479 --> 01:50:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, managerialism is so I mean, there's nothing more managerial

1686
01:50:31.399 --> 01:50:32.159
<v Speaker 2>than law fair.

1687
01:50:32.720 --> 01:50:35.600
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about how how pernicious law fair is

1688
01:50:35.640 --> 01:50:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and just how how it's so common now for people

1689
01:50:40.560 --> 01:50:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to weaponize bad faith interpretations of you know, contracts of laws,

1690
01:50:45.920 --> 01:50:49.399
<v Speaker 1>of agreements, even informal ones, and that was kind of

1691
01:50:49.439 --> 01:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>never the case before. And I suspect it has something

1692
01:50:52.560 --> 01:50:57.239
<v Speaker 1>to do with demographic changes and you know, the ripple

1693
01:50:57.279 --> 01:51:00.119
<v Speaker 1>effect of them affecting you know, cultures that were or

1694
01:51:00.199 --> 01:51:04.479
<v Speaker 1>otherwise you know, not exhibiting that behavior. But even amongst

1695
01:51:04.479 --> 01:51:08.840
<v Speaker 1>our social class, you know, it's it's it's still it's

1696
01:51:08.840 --> 01:51:13.439
<v Speaker 1>so pernicious now, where even five ten years ago, I

1697
01:51:13.600 --> 01:51:19.520
<v Speaker 1>at least in my experience, everybody kind of agreed functionally

1698
01:51:19.560 --> 01:51:24.359
<v Speaker 1>agreed on you know what, like what makes for an

1699
01:51:24.399 --> 01:51:28.680
<v Speaker 1>agreement or a contract or you know, an address of grievance.

1700
01:51:29.520 --> 01:51:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, once you start getting into you start importing all

1701
01:51:34.399 --> 01:51:37.520
<v Speaker 2>sorts of different cultures, you just you're not You're not

1702
01:51:37.560 --> 01:51:39.159
<v Speaker 2>going to have any unanimity.

1703
01:51:40.640 --> 01:51:43.079
<v Speaker 1>And and I think it's also a function of just

1704
01:51:43.159 --> 01:51:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the true economic state that we're in that despite what

1705
01:51:46.039 --> 01:51:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the graphs say, I don't have the luxury of you know,

1706
01:51:49.640 --> 01:51:54.000
<v Speaker 1>risking five thousand dollars deposit with a shittily written contract

1707
01:51:54.439 --> 01:51:56.199
<v Speaker 1>that I may or may not get back if you

1708
01:51:56.239 --> 01:51:58.560
<v Speaker 1>don't show up, because now I have to worry about that.

1709
01:52:00.479 --> 01:52:02.840
<v Speaker 2>This departure from the formal to the real was part

1710
01:52:02.880 --> 01:52:06.680
<v Speaker 2>of the Machiavelian tradition, and Moscaw thus welded it to

1711
01:52:06.720 --> 01:52:11.640
<v Speaker 2>the classical tradition of mixed constitution. In Burnham's words, juridical

1712
01:52:11.680 --> 01:52:15.039
<v Speaker 2>defense can be secure only where there are at work

1713
01:52:15.159 --> 01:52:19.600
<v Speaker 2>various in opposing tendencies and forces, and where these mutually

1714
01:52:19.680 --> 01:52:24.600
<v Speaker 2>check and restrain each other. The product of juridical defense

1715
01:52:24.760 --> 01:52:28.720
<v Speaker 2>is liberty. The specific forms of juridical defense include the

1716
01:52:28.760 --> 01:52:34.199
<v Speaker 2>familiar democratic rights, security of private property, security, against arbitrary arrest,

1717
01:52:34.359 --> 01:52:40.640
<v Speaker 2>freedom of religion, discussion, and assembly. Moreover, the multiplicity of

1718
01:52:40.720 --> 01:52:44.079
<v Speaker 2>social forces participating and sharing power in the ruling class

1719
01:52:44.159 --> 01:52:48.119
<v Speaker 2>leads to a high level of civilization and an efflorescence

1720
01:52:48.479 --> 01:52:49.600
<v Speaker 2>of cultural life.

1721
01:52:50.840 --> 01:52:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Yes, because in order that, in order for that to flourish,

1722
01:52:54.239 --> 01:52:56.800
<v Speaker 1>there has to be something outside the state. And I

1723
01:52:56.800 --> 01:53:00.119
<v Speaker 1>think that's the commonly accepted definition of liberty, which is

1724
01:53:00.199 --> 01:53:04.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of anything outside of the public anything in like,

1725
01:53:04.520 --> 01:53:07.760
<v Speaker 1>any informal actions you take is an act of liberty.

1726
01:53:08.279 --> 01:53:11.479
<v Speaker 1>And uh like there's you know, it may not it

1727
01:53:11.520 --> 01:53:14.840
<v Speaker 1>may not be formalized into law, but it's it's definitely

1728
01:53:15.079 --> 01:53:20.439
<v Speaker 1>uh a cultural change where that particular type of liberty,

1729
01:53:20.479 --> 01:53:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the important type of liberty that we like is uh

1730
01:53:24.359 --> 01:53:28.479
<v Speaker 1>just going away now in a in an informal manner.

1731
01:53:29.560 --> 01:53:33.279
<v Speaker 2>By way of contrast, the monopolization of power by one

1732
01:53:33.359 --> 01:53:36.399
<v Speaker 2>social force leads to its unchecked power and to a

1733
01:53:36.439 --> 01:53:41.680
<v Speaker 2>low level of civilization as other social forces with other resources, values,

1734
01:53:41.720 --> 01:53:47.159
<v Speaker 2>and skills are excluded and exploited. Using the concept of

1735
01:53:47.239 --> 01:53:50.960
<v Speaker 2>juridical defense and its antithesis, Moscow was able to evaluate

1736
01:53:51.000 --> 01:53:54.640
<v Speaker 2>different kinds of polities depending on the internal structure and

1737
01:53:54.720 --> 01:53:58.479
<v Speaker 2>composition of their elites. The worst kind of government would

1738
01:53:58.520 --> 01:54:01.600
<v Speaker 2>be the uniform regimes in which the unrestrained power of

1739
01:54:01.640 --> 01:54:05.479
<v Speaker 2>a single social force prevents all others from obtaining power

1740
01:54:05.840 --> 01:54:09.840
<v Speaker 2>and distributing to the public culture. The best kind of

1741
01:54:09.880 --> 01:54:13.479
<v Speaker 2>government to both Mosca and Pereto was the representative, middle

1742
01:54:13.479 --> 01:54:18.199
<v Speaker 2>class aristocratic parliamentary governments of the mid to late nineteenth century.

1743
01:54:19.000 --> 01:54:22.600
<v Speaker 2>This type, however, was threatened by the rise of mass democracy,

1744
01:54:22.920 --> 01:54:28.039
<v Speaker 2>new classes of wealth and power, and socialism yeah yeah.

1745
01:54:28.079 --> 01:54:32.039
<v Speaker 2>These forces, to both Mosca and Pereto, threaten to upset

1746
01:54:32.079 --> 01:54:36.319
<v Speaker 2>the delicate balance that underlies the juridical defense and to

1747
01:54:36.399 --> 01:54:42.960
<v Speaker 2>impose a monolithic regime on modern society. It should be

1748
01:54:43.079 --> 01:54:46.880
<v Speaker 2>noted that this normative measure of governments is fundamentally modern,

1749
01:54:47.119 --> 01:54:50.800
<v Speaker 2>and as such it follows Machiavelli and Monuscue. The best

1750
01:54:50.840 --> 01:54:53.439
<v Speaker 2>regime to Moscow and Pereto is not that in which

1751
01:54:53.479 --> 01:54:56.079
<v Speaker 2>the virtue of the citizen is most developed, but that

1752
01:54:56.199 --> 01:54:58.760
<v Speaker 2>in which the security and liberty of the citizen and

1753
01:54:58.800 --> 01:55:03.279
<v Speaker 2>the commonwealth are best partus. Although Mosca and the Machiavelians

1754
01:55:03.319 --> 01:55:06.960
<v Speaker 2>were influenced by Aristotle, Cicero, and the pre modern tradition

1755
01:55:07.039 --> 01:55:10.680
<v Speaker 2>of political thought. Their primary concern was not, as with

1756
01:55:10.760 --> 01:55:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the earlier school, the ethical realization of man and society.

1757
01:55:15.600 --> 01:55:19.680
<v Speaker 2>The special contribution of the Machiavelian tradition, however, is the

1758
01:55:19.800 --> 01:55:23.960
<v Speaker 2>establishment of a criterion of normative judgment of regimes based

1759
01:55:24.000 --> 01:55:27.399
<v Speaker 2>on empirical rather than on transcendental grounds.

1760
01:55:29.399 --> 01:55:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think dey'll notche would disagree with that slightly.

1761
01:55:34.680 --> 01:55:39.159
<v Speaker 2>Burnham accepted this Machiavelian formulation and its fundamental to his

1762
01:55:39.520 --> 01:55:44.119
<v Speaker 2>entire career as a political thinker. His primary concern, like Machiavelli's,

1763
01:55:44.279 --> 01:55:48.560
<v Speaker 2>was to establish a verifiable methodology for the analysis of

1764
01:55:48.640 --> 01:55:52.000
<v Speaker 2>social and political affairs, but he was also concerned to

1765
01:55:52.079 --> 01:55:57.199
<v Speaker 2>discover a realistic means of evaluating judging political institutions and behavior.

1766
01:56:01.359 --> 01:56:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh nothing, this is just explaining kind of the etymology

1767
01:56:04.199 --> 01:56:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of how we came to regard regimes.

1768
01:56:09.640 --> 01:56:13.880
<v Speaker 2>He found both in the Machiavelians, and it was the

1769
01:56:14.079 --> 01:56:18.079
<v Speaker 2>limitation of power that remained for him the primary political ideal,

1770
01:56:18.920 --> 01:56:22.199
<v Speaker 2>quoting the Machiavelians are the only ones who have told

1771
01:56:22.279 --> 01:56:25.840
<v Speaker 2>us the full truth about power. The primary object in

1772
01:56:25.920 --> 01:56:29.119
<v Speaker 2>practice of all rulers is to serve their own interests,

1773
01:56:29.159 --> 01:56:33.079
<v Speaker 2>to maintain their own power and privilege. No theory, no promises,

1774
01:56:33.119 --> 01:56:37.479
<v Speaker 2>no morality, no amount of goodwill, no religion will restrain power.

1775
01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Neither priests nor soldiers, neither labor leaders nor businessmen, neither

1776
01:56:41.880 --> 01:56:44.800
<v Speaker 2>bureaucrats nor feudal lords will differ from each other in

1777
01:56:44.880 --> 01:56:47.800
<v Speaker 2>the basic use which they will seek to make of power.

1778
01:56:48.479 --> 01:56:53.239
<v Speaker 2>Only power restrains power. When all opposition is destroyed, there

1779
01:56:53.319 --> 01:56:55.800
<v Speaker 2>is no longer any limit to what power may do.

1780
01:56:56.439 --> 01:57:00.880
<v Speaker 2>A despotism, any kind of despotism, can be evolent only

1781
01:57:00.960 --> 01:57:01.720
<v Speaker 2>by accident.

1782
01:57:04.199 --> 01:57:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll see. I think, uh, I think this assumes

1783
01:57:09.600 --> 01:57:14.479
<v Speaker 1>that uh, you know, it assumes a base uh human nature,

1784
01:57:15.720 --> 01:57:18.399
<v Speaker 1>even amongst the elites that I don't know if is

1785
01:57:18.399 --> 01:57:22.840
<v Speaker 1>applicable today, especially you know, given given the uh just

1786
01:57:22.880 --> 01:57:26.119
<v Speaker 1>a radical departure and competence from his time to ours,

1787
01:57:26.359 --> 01:57:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and then also kind of the growth of uh, you

1788
01:57:28.920 --> 01:57:31.479
<v Speaker 1>know ai ai assistance.

1789
01:57:32.520 --> 01:57:35.800
<v Speaker 2>In the managerial revolution. Burnham had developed a model for

1790
01:57:36.039 --> 01:57:40.760
<v Speaker 2>explanation of current world events, the depression, the rise of totalitarianism,

1791
01:57:40.800 --> 01:57:45.000
<v Speaker 2>revolutionary changes in social and economic structure, political behavior, and

1792
01:57:45.079 --> 01:57:51.079
<v Speaker 2>intellectual and cultural fermentation. The chief problem with his presentation

1793
01:57:51.199 --> 01:57:53.680
<v Speaker 2>of the theory of the manager or revolution was its

1794
01:57:53.720 --> 01:57:58.439
<v Speaker 2>over reliance on Marxist economic determinism and analogies drawn from

1795
01:57:58.439 --> 01:58:03.399
<v Speaker 2>the Marxist interpretation of history. The Machiavelians, however, were not

1796
01:58:03.600 --> 01:58:07.319
<v Speaker 2>economic determinists, and their interpretation of history was far more

1797
01:58:07.359 --> 01:58:12.079
<v Speaker 2>flexible than that of marx. Burnham therefore undertook to restate

1798
01:58:12.119 --> 01:58:14.600
<v Speaker 2>the theory of the managerial revolution in terms of the

1799
01:58:14.640 --> 01:58:21.159
<v Speaker 2>Machiavelian analytical framework. According to the Machiavelian model, an elite

1800
01:58:21.279 --> 01:58:25.119
<v Speaker 2>or ruling class suffers a crisis of power under certain circumstances.

1801
01:58:25.720 --> 01:58:31.239
<v Speaker 2>Burnham retained in the Machiavelians the essentially economic definition of

1802
01:58:31.279 --> 01:58:35.279
<v Speaker 2>the old elite as a capitalist, bourgeois or entrepreneurial class

1803
01:58:35.279 --> 01:58:39.199
<v Speaker 2>that owned and operated the means of production. However, the

1804
01:58:39.239 --> 01:58:42.479
<v Speaker 2>economic forces and relationships were not the central factors in

1805
01:58:42.520 --> 01:58:45.119
<v Speaker 2>bringing about the crisis of the old elite and the

1806
01:58:45.199 --> 01:58:49.079
<v Speaker 2>rise of a new one. The rise of new social forces,

1807
01:58:49.439 --> 01:58:54.199
<v Speaker 2>especially technological developments, over which the capitalist or entrepreneurial elite

1808
01:58:54.239 --> 01:58:59.159
<v Speaker 2>has no control, has made its institutions and ideologies obsolete

1809
01:58:59.399 --> 01:59:05.279
<v Speaker 2>and less useful for preserving its power. The old elite

1810
01:59:05.359 --> 01:59:10.800
<v Speaker 2>has also undergone a psychological, intellectual, and moral denigration degeneration.

1811
01:59:11.920 --> 01:59:15.119
<v Speaker 2>It shows little faith in its own ideology and institutions,

1812
01:59:15.159 --> 01:59:19.520
<v Speaker 2>and it exhibits Mosca's aristocratic tendency and a crystallization of

1813
01:59:19.560 --> 01:59:27.039
<v Speaker 2>its membership, interests and activities instead of a dynamic, innovative expansion. Finally,

1814
01:59:27.319 --> 01:59:31.840
<v Speaker 2>the entrepreneurial elite is tending to abandon political and professional

1815
01:59:31.880 --> 01:59:36.520
<v Speaker 2>pursuits in favor of cultural and leisure activities. It is

1816
01:59:36.640 --> 01:59:41.520
<v Speaker 2>drawn to humanitarian and irrationalist ideologies that undermine its own rule,

1817
01:59:41.880 --> 01:59:44.880
<v Speaker 2>and it shows an increasing reluctance and inability to use

1818
01:59:44.960 --> 01:59:49.560
<v Speaker 2>force effectively. The Class one or fox like residues of

1819
01:59:49.600 --> 01:59:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Paretto are accumulating too heavily in the entrepreneurial elite. In

1820
01:59:55.720 --> 02:00:00.119
<v Speaker 2>opposition to these signs of decadence is the aggressive, efficient, dynamic,

1821
02:00:00.239 --> 02:00:04.560
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes fanatical character of the rising managerial class. It's

1822
02:00:04.600 --> 02:00:10.000
<v Speaker 2>self a new social force, quoting from the machiavelians, the

1823
02:00:10.039 --> 02:00:14.279
<v Speaker 2>production executives and organizers of the industrial process, officials trained

1824
02:00:14.319 --> 02:00:18.439
<v Speaker 2>in the manipulation of the great labor organizations, and the administrators,

1825
02:00:18.680 --> 02:00:21.880
<v Speaker 2>bureau chiefs and commissaurs developed in the executive branch of

1826
02:00:21.920 --> 02:00:25.439
<v Speaker 2>the unlimited modern state machines, And that the and that

1827
02:00:25.520 --> 02:00:29.239
<v Speaker 2>the managers may function. The economic and political structure must

1828
02:00:29.279 --> 02:00:33.079
<v Speaker 2>be modified, as it is now being modified, so as

1829
02:00:33.119 --> 02:00:36.039
<v Speaker 2>to rest no longer on private ownership and small scale

1830
02:00:36.159 --> 02:00:40.119
<v Speaker 2>nationalist sovereignty, but primarily upon state control of the economy

1831
02:00:40.159 --> 02:00:44.199
<v Speaker 2>and continental or vast regional world political organization.

1832
02:00:46.000 --> 02:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, I don't know about all that, but

1833
02:00:48.840 --> 02:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we were talking about this yesterday. The line

1834
02:00:51.960 --> 02:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>between ownership and control is continually being blurred. And that's

1835
02:00:56.760 --> 02:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the ways you know that

1836
02:00:58.680 --> 02:01:01.439
<v Speaker 1>we live in a managerial state. It is, you know,

1837
02:01:01.560 --> 02:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the the owner of my business has very little control

1838
02:01:05.439 --> 02:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>over it other than the hiring and firing of me,

1839
02:01:09.039 --> 02:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>and like, I pretty much make command decisions every day

1840
02:01:14.600 --> 02:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in his stead, and he gives me the like his

1841
02:01:17.880 --> 02:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>only function is to provide capital and give me the

1842
02:01:20.800 --> 02:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>thumbs up or the thumbs down. And that's not a

1843
02:01:25.239 --> 02:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>capitalist definition of ownership at all.

1844
02:01:28.479 --> 02:01:31.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Viveka has been talking about this when it comes

1845
02:01:31.319 --> 02:01:34.680
<v Speaker 2>to the president. He said that anybody who gets elected

1846
02:01:34.680 --> 02:01:38.319
<v Speaker 2>should be in charge. So the person who gets elected,

1847
02:01:38.359 --> 02:01:40.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, and let's face it, he uses the term

1848
02:01:40.880 --> 02:01:43.319
<v Speaker 2>managerial all the time. He talks about, you know, how

1849
02:01:43.359 --> 02:01:46.239
<v Speaker 2>we're a managerial state. He's read Burnham, he knows all

1850
02:01:46.239 --> 02:01:46.520
<v Speaker 2>of this.

1851
02:01:47.119 --> 02:01:50.239
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, it's just how how when when you have

1852
02:01:50.319 --> 02:01:57.319
<v Speaker 1>such a complex technologically complex and and personnel, Uh, I

1853
02:01:57.319 --> 02:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>guess he humanly complex and to he like, you know,

1854
02:02:01.039 --> 02:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the the executive branch. How how how does the president

1855
02:02:05.119 --> 02:02:06.279
<v Speaker 1>exercise ownership?

1856
02:02:06.680 --> 02:02:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, he has to be able to basically be able

1857
02:02:10.560 --> 02:02:12.159
<v Speaker 2>to hire and fire whoever he wants.

1858
02:02:13.399 --> 02:02:16.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yep, yeah, that's part of it. Absolutely. I think

1859
02:02:16.039 --> 02:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the best you can do. You know, going back

1860
02:02:19.640 --> 02:02:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to Charles Haywood's episode on on Elon Musk, Elon Musk

1861
02:02:24.399 --> 02:02:28.279
<v Speaker 1>will walk walk around a plant and make it no

1862
02:02:28.439 --> 02:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>less than a hundred command decisions during that visit, and

1863
02:02:32.119 --> 02:02:35.479
<v Speaker 1>like that's how he actually exercises ownership to whatever degree,

1864
02:02:36.119 --> 02:02:40.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, the physical limitations of time give him and

1865
02:02:41.560 --> 02:02:43.439
<v Speaker 1>so like he's kind of a different beast too.

1866
02:02:44.079 --> 02:02:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, he needs the person needs to be in charge,

1867
02:02:47.920 --> 02:02:50.960
<v Speaker 2>needs to FDR is the perfect example of it. FDR

1868
02:02:51.119 --> 02:02:55.319
<v Speaker 2>was a king. He was a dictator. All the power rested,

1869
02:02:55.399 --> 02:02:58.520
<v Speaker 2>all the power in the government rested in him. Nobody

1870
02:02:58.560 --> 02:03:04.119
<v Speaker 2>did anything any thing without his say. So this vast

1871
02:03:04.119 --> 02:03:07.600
<v Speaker 2>reorganization will require the use of force, military machines, and

1872
02:03:07.680 --> 02:03:11.880
<v Speaker 2>soldiers far more than did the old capitalist society. Hence,

1873
02:03:11.920 --> 02:03:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the ruling class of managers will include more allions or

1874
02:03:14.840 --> 02:03:19.039
<v Speaker 2>Class two residues than did the entrepreneurial elite. The political

1875
02:03:19.039 --> 02:03:22.720
<v Speaker 2>formula of the managers will be democratists and will appeal

1876
02:03:22.760 --> 02:03:25.399
<v Speaker 2>to the emotions and material once of the masses, but

1877
02:03:25.439 --> 02:03:31.079
<v Speaker 2>the political reality will be autoautocracy, what Burnham calls bonapartism,

1878
02:03:31.399 --> 02:03:35.039
<v Speaker 2>represented by the Nazi, Stalinist and New Deal political style

1879
02:03:35.079 --> 02:03:41.359
<v Speaker 2>and ideologies will prevail over the constitutionalist, decentralized parliamentary governments

1880
02:03:41.479 --> 02:03:42.680
<v Speaker 2>of the capitalist era.

1881
02:03:44.159 --> 02:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's you know that the ignorance of managerialism as

1882
02:03:49.600 --> 02:03:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the defining feature of our time right now is really

1883
02:03:53.560 --> 02:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the biggest obstacle towards getting the normies to at least

1884
02:03:58.560 --> 02:04:03.119
<v Speaker 1>a little bit closer to being able to effectively analyze reality.

1885
02:04:06.079 --> 02:04:08.119
<v Speaker 2>Ideology stands in the way of that.

1886
02:04:10.039 --> 02:04:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it doesn't have to, because most normies aren't

1887
02:04:13.319 --> 02:04:16.319
<v Speaker 1>ideological either. They just don't know this. We need to.

1888
02:04:16.399 --> 02:04:20.319
<v Speaker 1>We need to wake them up, bro, And like, not

1889
02:04:20.319 --> 02:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>not because you know, we we hope to seize power anything,

1890
02:04:22.840 --> 02:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>but just because it's it's the right thing to do.

1891
02:04:24.960 --> 02:04:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Well. AA makes makes a point in this book that

1892
02:04:28.439 --> 02:04:31.079
<v Speaker 2>if you wake up, then if the normies get get

1893
02:04:31.079 --> 02:04:33.279
<v Speaker 2>waken woken up too much and too many of them

1894
02:04:33.319 --> 02:04:39.159
<v Speaker 2>get woken up, then you suffer the you suffer revolution. Yeah.

1895
02:04:39.159 --> 02:04:42.600
<v Speaker 2>And we're not talking We're talking about France, not not American.

1896
02:04:43.960 --> 02:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1897
02:04:45.520 --> 02:04:49.560
<v Speaker 2>The tendency of bonapartism and of the managerial class is totalitarian.

1898
02:04:50.159 --> 02:04:53.279
<v Speaker 2>The managers want, need, and find valuable a state that

1899
02:04:53.399 --> 02:04:58.039
<v Speaker 2>is unitary and all powerful. Intermediary and non political institutions

1900
02:04:58.039 --> 02:05:00.920
<v Speaker 2>and groups are denounced and undermined if they do not

1901
02:05:00.960 --> 02:05:05.000
<v Speaker 2>support the rising managerial powers. Not only does the managerial

1902
02:05:05.039 --> 02:05:08.119
<v Speaker 2>class need an extended and oipotent state for its own

1903
02:05:08.239 --> 02:05:12.359
<v Speaker 2>internal and international policies and goals, but also the crisis

1904
02:05:12.399 --> 02:05:15.920
<v Speaker 2>of the Depression and the Second World War gives it

1905
02:05:16.000 --> 02:05:21.560
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity to create one. Hence managerial propaganda. It denounces

1906
02:05:21.600 --> 02:05:26.960
<v Speaker 2>the entrepreneurial class and its supportive institutions churches, non politicized

1907
02:05:27.000 --> 02:05:33.199
<v Speaker 2>labor unions, small businessmen, schools, the opposition press, local political institutions,

1908
02:05:33.359 --> 02:05:37.560
<v Speaker 2>the Congress itself, and seeks to portray them as reactionary,

1909
02:05:37.760 --> 02:05:41.800
<v Speaker 2>parochial and responsible for the present crisis and its misery

1910
02:05:43.159 --> 02:05:47.800
<v Speaker 2>only by destroying and moving beyond these obsolescent forces, can

1911
02:05:47.840 --> 02:05:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the crisis be resolved? Burnham was not happy. Do we

1912
02:05:54.720 --> 02:06:05.560
<v Speaker 2>stop there? I mean, you just describe reality. Bro Burnham

1913
02:06:05.600 --> 02:06:09.479
<v Speaker 2>was not happy about the totaltarian vector of managerial society

1914
02:06:10.039 --> 02:06:15.760
<v Speaker 2>private capitalist ownership of the economy. He wrote, quote meant

1915
02:06:15.800 --> 02:06:19.399
<v Speaker 2>a dispersion of economic power and a partial separation between

1916
02:06:19.399 --> 02:06:22.880
<v Speaker 2>economic and other social forces in a manner that prevented

1917
02:06:22.920 --> 02:06:27.880
<v Speaker 2>the concentration of an overwhelming single social force. Today, the

1918
02:06:27.920 --> 02:06:32.239
<v Speaker 2>advance of the managerial revolution is everywhere, concentrating economic power

1919
02:06:32.239 --> 02:06:35.199
<v Speaker 2>in the state apparatus, where it tends to unite with

1920
02:06:35.279 --> 02:06:41.520
<v Speaker 2>control over the other great social forces, the army, education, labor, law,

1921
02:06:41.720 --> 02:06:46.680
<v Speaker 2>the political bureaucracy, art and science. Even this development too,

1922
02:06:47.479 --> 02:06:52.239
<v Speaker 2>soci especially now, Yeah, this development too tends to destroy

1923
02:06:52.319 --> 02:06:56.439
<v Speaker 2>the basis for those social oppositions that keep freedom alive

1924
02:06:58.720 --> 02:07:04.000
<v Speaker 2>the entrepreneur. The entrepreneurs are therefore correct to argue that

1925
02:07:04.039 --> 02:07:07.119
<v Speaker 2>the New Deal and other managerial policies were a threat

1926
02:07:07.199 --> 02:07:11.640
<v Speaker 2>to freedom. But the entrepreneurial former formulas of market capitalism,

1927
02:07:11.800 --> 02:07:15.920
<v Speaker 2>a limited state, and national sovereignty had lost their credibility

1928
02:07:16.680 --> 02:07:20.359
<v Speaker 2>in any case. The debate between the conservatives see that's

1929
02:07:20.359 --> 02:07:23.239
<v Speaker 2>something that people just don't realize. People who are for

1930
02:07:23.439 --> 02:07:29.000
<v Speaker 2>market capitalism, a limited state, and national sovereignty understand that.

1931
02:07:30.159 --> 02:07:32.520
<v Speaker 2>They don't. They're not willing to accept that. It's lost

1932
02:07:32.560 --> 02:07:35.680
<v Speaker 2>their credibility and they they think.

1933
02:07:35.520 --> 02:07:39.119
<v Speaker 1>That they don't understand where we are right now in history.

1934
02:07:39.159 --> 02:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>They don't know where they're at. We're past that where

1935
02:07:42.520 --> 02:07:45.199
<v Speaker 1>you're now, and like those days are over, they're not

1936
02:07:45.239 --> 02:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>coming back.

1937
02:07:45.760 --> 02:07:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and to constantly you know, it's well, no, this

1938
02:07:50.039 --> 02:07:51.520
<v Speaker 2>is the way things are done, this is the way

1939
02:07:51.560 --> 02:07:54.119
<v Speaker 2>things should be. That this is what guarantees the most

1940
02:07:54.159 --> 02:07:57.399
<v Speaker 2>individual freedom. Bro, we're beyond it.

1941
02:07:57.640 --> 02:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1942
02:07:57.880 --> 02:07:58.239
<v Speaker 2>Freedom.

1943
02:07:58.840 --> 02:08:00.439
<v Speaker 1>My favorite question for them to.

1944
02:08:00.399 --> 02:08:05.279
<v Speaker 2>Do, what freedom to do? What I had I wouldn't

1945
02:08:05.279 --> 02:08:07.800
<v Speaker 2>even say who it was, but I had a libertarian

1946
02:08:07.880 --> 02:08:11.039
<v Speaker 2>in my d MS today it's just freaking out. He's like,

1947
02:08:11.680 --> 02:08:15.319
<v Speaker 2>why are there so many libertarians who argue for like

1948
02:08:15.520 --> 02:08:21.079
<v Speaker 2>that the most heinous stuff and stuff that's illegal and

1949
02:08:21.119 --> 02:08:23.600
<v Speaker 2>not only illegal, but would be considered immoral by the

1950
02:08:23.640 --> 02:08:28.000
<v Speaker 2>majority of the West at least, is okay?

1951
02:08:29.680 --> 02:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, they they took a legal theory and turned it

1952
02:08:32.520 --> 02:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>into an ideology. Like somebody said that in one of

1953
02:08:35.600 --> 02:08:37.279
<v Speaker 1>the threads. I was like, yeah, pretty much Dave.

1954
02:08:37.439 --> 02:08:39.159
<v Speaker 2>Dave had a thread today said that.

1955
02:08:40.239 --> 02:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it was Dave. Yeah, you took a legal

1956
02:08:42.720 --> 02:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>theory like a dry what's supposed to be a dry

1957
02:08:45.520 --> 02:08:49.159
<v Speaker 1>not fun legal theory, and turn it into your entire identity,

1958
02:08:49.520 --> 02:08:53.279
<v Speaker 1>like good job. You are just a piece of human

1959
02:08:53.319 --> 02:08:57.239
<v Speaker 1>trash that will never Yeah, and you will until until you.

1960
02:08:57.119 --> 02:09:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Stop and the inevitable end of your of your theoretical

1961
02:09:04.039 --> 02:09:08.239
<v Speaker 2>whatever is talking about whether possession of childborn is a crime.

1962
02:09:09.520 --> 02:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that's why, like if if they were, I

1963
02:09:12.000 --> 02:09:14.079
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't say they're pieces of trash that will never amount

1964
02:09:14.119 --> 02:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to anything, because then I just wouldn't care. But it's

1965
02:09:16.840 --> 02:09:22.159
<v Speaker 1>the the the proactive part of libertarianism is making sure

1966
02:09:22.199 --> 02:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that you and more importantly, your children are propagandas to that.

1967
02:09:26.800 --> 02:09:29.359
<v Speaker 1>And they're just you know, they're not as bad as

1968
02:09:29.439 --> 02:09:32.479
<v Speaker 1>leftists because they don't hold any power whatsoever. They're just

1969
02:09:33.239 --> 02:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>like I wouldn't I wouldn't let them babysit my kids.

1970
02:09:35.840 --> 02:09:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think the biggest problem with it is is

1971
02:09:38.560 --> 02:09:42.960
<v Speaker 2>that these free market principles, and these these free principles

1972
02:09:43.039 --> 02:09:49.439
<v Speaker 2>are so easily the language of that is so easily

1973
02:09:49.479 --> 02:09:52.520
<v Speaker 2>adopted by people in power, and then.

1974
02:09:52.840 --> 02:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it's so Jewish.

1975
02:09:55.640 --> 02:10:00.680
<v Speaker 2>It's so easily adopted by people in power who will say, oh,

1976
02:10:00.680 --> 02:10:04.239
<v Speaker 2>look we have free trade, and it's like, well, no,

1977
02:10:04.439 --> 02:10:05.880
<v Speaker 2>but that's not real free trade.

1978
02:10:06.800 --> 02:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>We're shipping in, Yeah, we're we're shipping in sex toys

1979
02:10:09.880 --> 02:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>for your toddler.

1980
02:10:10.920 --> 02:10:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And then and then free trade has never been tried.

1981
02:10:13.920 --> 02:10:16.239
<v Speaker 2>Why are you using that term? And it's like, well,

1982
02:10:17.199 --> 02:10:20.279
<v Speaker 2>because it's so easily everything, everything you come up with

1983
02:10:20.359 --> 02:10:21.680
<v Speaker 2>canon will be used against you.

1984
02:10:23.159 --> 02:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yep, everything will be manipulated, which, you know, if

1985
02:10:27.039 --> 02:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>they want to know how, then they should watch this episode.

1986
02:10:31.039 --> 02:10:34.079
<v Speaker 2>In any case, the debate between the conservative spokesman for

1987
02:10:34.159 --> 02:10:37.720
<v Speaker 2>the old line capitalist class and the Marxist and the

1988
02:10:37.760 --> 02:10:41.840
<v Speaker 2>democratics utalitarians who defend the rising managerial class as a

1989
02:10:41.880 --> 02:10:46.119
<v Speaker 2>debate and ideology and myths that express a contest for

1990
02:10:46.239 --> 02:10:51.720
<v Speaker 2>control over the despotic and bonapartist political order, which they

1991
02:10:51.760 --> 02:10:56.840
<v Speaker 2>both anticipate. The apologists for the managers would destroy all

1992
02:10:56.880 --> 02:11:01.199
<v Speaker 2>liberty and juridical defense in pursuit of utapianism, and the

1993
02:11:01.239 --> 02:11:05.119
<v Speaker 2>apologists of traditional capitalism are simply whistling in the wind.

1994
02:11:05.199 --> 02:11:09.119
<v Speaker 2>For quote, it is in any case impossible to return

1995
02:11:09.199 --> 02:11:11.960
<v Speaker 2>to private capitalism.

1996
02:11:12.239 --> 02:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>See, yeah, I mean one thing I have to hand

1997
02:11:15.560 --> 02:11:20.319
<v Speaker 1>it to, you know, uh, whether conscious or not Malthusians

1998
02:11:20.600 --> 02:11:28.039
<v Speaker 1>is that they're not utopian. I gotta respect him for

1999
02:11:28.119 --> 02:11:31.359
<v Speaker 1>that what everybody else seems to be and maybe quote

2000
02:11:31.359 --> 02:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of the episode, Hey, at least they're not utopian yet.

2001
02:11:36.520 --> 02:11:40.199
<v Speaker 2>Burnham was not entirely pessimistic about the survival of some liberty.

2002
02:11:40.479 --> 02:11:43.920
<v Speaker 2>He suggested that some social opposition might persist or develop,

2003
02:11:44.000 --> 02:11:46.720
<v Speaker 2>the would or develop that would create a balance of

2004
02:11:46.760 --> 02:11:49.680
<v Speaker 2>forces in the managerial elite, and he also hoped that

2005
02:11:49.720 --> 02:11:52.640
<v Speaker 2>the principles of the Machiavelian science of power would inform

2006
02:11:52.680 --> 02:11:55.760
<v Speaker 2>the new ruling class of its real interests and of

2007
02:11:55.800 --> 02:11:59.479
<v Speaker 2>the utility of liberty. Now, anybody who's like out there,

2008
02:12:00.279 --> 02:12:03.960
<v Speaker 2>anybody who's out there promoting liberty and everything, just read

2009
02:12:03.960 --> 02:12:05.600
<v Speaker 2>that and went that's me.

2010
02:12:10.159 --> 02:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's uh, it's very much limited to utilitarianism. And

2011
02:12:13.960 --> 02:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that's also kind of a product of man. Uh, the

2012
02:12:20.199 --> 02:12:29.279
<v Speaker 1>shift to utilitarian I guess utilitarian metaphysics is is a

2013
02:12:29.319 --> 02:12:35.279
<v Speaker 1>product of the rise of revolutionary Marxism and that energy

2014
02:12:35.279 --> 02:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>being transferred, the revolutionary energy being transferred into the managerial class.

2015
02:12:40.520 --> 02:12:45.439
<v Speaker 1>They're all it's all utility. How many utils will will

2016
02:12:45.439 --> 02:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you generate if I give you a stimmy check? Oh?

2017
02:12:48.960 --> 02:12:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Well a utils? Okay, you're getting a stemmy check. How

2018
02:12:52.439 --> 02:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>many utils will I generate if I put a bullet

2019
02:12:54.720 --> 02:12:55.159
<v Speaker 1>in your head?

2020
02:12:57.800 --> 02:13:02.279
<v Speaker 2>M He developed allan defense of liberty and juridical defense

2021
02:13:02.319 --> 02:13:05.840
<v Speaker 2>on the grounds that they actually enhanced the cohesion, strength,

2022
02:13:05.880 --> 02:13:12.439
<v Speaker 2>and flexibility of a society, rather than limited the Machiavellians problem.

2023
02:13:12.640 --> 02:13:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Probably Burnham's most widely misunderstood book. George Orwell appears to

2024
02:13:17.279 --> 02:13:19.640
<v Speaker 2>have seen it in a blueprint for the Double Think

2025
02:13:19.720 --> 02:13:25.319
<v Speaker 2>of nineteen eighty four. The sociologist David Spitz took a

2026
02:13:25.359 --> 02:13:28.239
<v Speaker 2>similar view of the book and included Burnham as an

2027
02:13:28.279 --> 02:13:33.279
<v Speaker 2>anti democratic ideologue. The very subtitle of Burnham's book, Defenders

2028
02:13:33.279 --> 02:13:37.960
<v Speaker 2>of Freedom, should be sufficient to refute this misinterpretation, and

2029
02:13:38.039 --> 02:13:39.880
<v Speaker 2>it may be that some critics of the book have

2030
02:13:40.000 --> 02:13:42.600
<v Speaker 2>not read far beyond the subtitle.

2031
02:13:43.479 --> 02:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>That's me, that's me.

2032
02:13:46.159 --> 02:13:48.680
<v Speaker 2>With every book, it is true that Burnham described the

2033
02:13:48.720 --> 02:13:51.960
<v Speaker 2>coming society and the starkest language. Yet this style is

2034
02:13:52.000 --> 02:13:55.880
<v Speaker 2>typical of Machiavelli and his disciples, and is appropriate to

2035
02:13:55.920 --> 02:14:00.399
<v Speaker 2>their claim to realism and disavowal of ideology and sent cements.

2036
02:14:01.840 --> 02:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>So I've actually never read The Machiavelians. But does Burnham

2037
02:14:06.239 --> 02:14:11.079
<v Speaker 1>adopt a different style than say, The Managerial Revolution, Like,

2038
02:14:11.880 --> 02:14:13.479
<v Speaker 1>is it a noticeably different tone?

2039
02:14:14.520 --> 02:14:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, he has a very distinct way of writing.

2040
02:14:17.000 --> 02:14:19.039
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you if you read The Managerial Revolution,

2041
02:14:19.119 --> 02:14:20.600
<v Speaker 2>you read Suicide of the West. I mean it's the

2042
02:14:20.640 --> 02:14:23.000
<v Speaker 2>same you know, it's the same person writing it.

2043
02:14:24.159 --> 02:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, all right, I thought I thought he switched

2044
02:14:26.800 --> 02:14:29.319
<v Speaker 1>up his tone, which would be insane.

2045
02:14:29.159 --> 02:14:33.640
<v Speaker 2>That would be nuts. It is difficult to see how

2046
02:14:33.680 --> 02:14:36.960
<v Speaker 2>any familiarity with the contents and arguments of The Machiavelians

2047
02:14:36.960 --> 02:14:40.600
<v Speaker 2>could overlook Burnham's exposition of the theory of juridical defense,

2048
02:14:41.000 --> 02:14:45.319
<v Speaker 2>his criticism of managerial political tendencies, or his own defensive liberty.

2049
02:14:45.640 --> 02:14:48.239
<v Speaker 2>The fact that many critics have missed these points suggest

2050
02:14:48.279 --> 02:14:52.079
<v Speaker 2>that Burnham's discussion of ideology applies to the authors of

2051
02:14:52.119 --> 02:14:59.800
<v Speaker 2>such criticism. And that's what mister Samuel Francis had to

2052
02:15:00.000 --> 02:15:01.720
<v Speaker 2>say about The Mafia Villans.

2053
02:15:02.880 --> 02:15:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, I mean it's I like these kind of

2054
02:15:06.439 --> 02:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>critiques that aren't really critiques, it's just an an exposition

2055
02:15:11.119 --> 02:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of it. And I I try to do that myself

2056
02:15:15.880 --> 02:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>with some original works, and it never works so well

2057
02:15:19.560 --> 02:15:22.159
<v Speaker 1>for me because I'm just not that eloquent.

2058
02:15:23.159 --> 02:15:26.479
<v Speaker 2>Now it's.

2059
02:15:26.520 --> 02:15:33.079
<v Speaker 1>I do podcast reviews in Milwaukee tool reviews.

2060
02:15:34.279 --> 02:15:36.239
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those books that when you read it,

2061
02:15:36.279 --> 02:15:36.920
<v Speaker 2>you're going to have.

2062
02:15:37.479 --> 02:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2063
02:15:38.039 --> 02:15:40.119
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those books that if you're a if

2064
02:15:40.119 --> 02:15:45.680
<v Speaker 2>you're a hardcore ideologue, you may not read. You may

2065
02:15:45.680 --> 02:15:48.560
<v Speaker 2>not get it the first time. Yeah, you may have.

2066
02:15:49.319 --> 02:15:50.760
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those things that a couple of years

2067
02:15:50.760 --> 02:15:53.279
<v Speaker 2>down the line, maybe something that was like somebody told

2068
02:15:53.319 --> 02:15:56.359
<v Speaker 2>me at the beginning of twenty nineteen to read Jarvin's

2069
02:15:56.399 --> 02:15:59.239
<v Speaker 2>Why I'm Not a Libertarian? And I read it, and

2070
02:15:59.279 --> 02:16:01.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, a couple of good points in here. I

2071
02:16:01.159 --> 02:16:05.399
<v Speaker 2>don't care. Twenty twenty rolls around. Yeah, twenty twenty rolls around.

2072
02:16:06.479 --> 02:16:10.199
<v Speaker 2>Everything happens. We start getting into the summer, yeah, and

2073
02:16:10.439 --> 02:16:15.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, cities are on fire, and you know, I'm like, yeah,

2074
02:16:15.399 --> 02:16:19.680
<v Speaker 2>let me read that again. And I'm like, oh, oh, oh, yeah, okay,

2075
02:16:19.880 --> 02:16:21.920
<v Speaker 2>And then I read it again like a year ago,

2076
02:16:21.960 --> 02:16:24.279
<v Speaker 2>and I was just like, this is this makes more

2077
02:16:24.359 --> 02:16:27.399
<v Speaker 2>sense than anything than anything I've ever read as far

2078
02:16:27.479 --> 02:16:31.159
<v Speaker 2>as a critique of a critique of libertarianism.

2079
02:16:31.840 --> 02:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I did try to I did try to crack the

2080
02:16:34.600 --> 02:16:38.319
<v Speaker 1>managerial uh not the Machiavellians back in the day when

2081
02:16:38.399 --> 02:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Jarvin was talking about it, and I couldn't get through

2082
02:16:42.319 --> 02:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it because I just I was in that same phace

2083
02:16:45.040 --> 02:16:48.239
<v Speaker 1>like this. None of this resonates with me. None of

2084
02:16:48.239 --> 02:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it's particularly interesting or prescient. And now as we're reading this,

2085
02:16:53.120 --> 02:16:57.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, all right, I wish I talked more, but

2086
02:16:57.959 --> 02:16:59.559
<v Speaker 1>like I'm too busy agreeing with it.

2087
02:17:00.079 --> 02:17:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Know, it's there's a way. There's a way you want

2088
02:17:04.760 --> 02:17:08.479
<v Speaker 2>politics to be, and there's where what politics is now.

2089
02:17:08.600 --> 02:17:10.479
<v Speaker 2>And if you want politics to be a certain way

2090
02:17:10.760 --> 02:17:12.319
<v Speaker 2>you're going to have to take You have to take

2091
02:17:12.360 --> 02:17:13.079
<v Speaker 2>power and do it.

2092
02:17:15.000 --> 02:17:17.319
<v Speaker 1>At the at the very least, you have to acknowledge

2093
02:17:17.360 --> 02:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that the only form of society you're ever going to

2094
02:17:21.440 --> 02:17:24.360
<v Speaker 1>be in some form of an oligarchy, which is a

2095
02:17:24.479 --> 02:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>huge hurdle for a lot of people.

2096
02:17:27.000 --> 02:17:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's well, there may be a white pill in there.

2097
02:17:31.639 --> 02:17:35.520
<v Speaker 2>If you really understand elite theory, if a la if

2098
02:17:35.520 --> 02:17:38.120
<v Speaker 2>you embrace it, if you realize that it's always a

2099
02:17:38.159 --> 02:17:44.159
<v Speaker 2>small group of people in charge, there's a chance that

2100
02:17:45.120 --> 02:17:47.840
<v Speaker 2>you could actually be a part of a group that

2101
02:17:48.239 --> 02:17:51.360
<v Speaker 2>gets those that helps to get those people in charge,

2102
02:17:51.360 --> 02:17:54.319
<v Speaker 2>people who are on your side, who at least you know.

2103
02:17:54.319 --> 02:17:56.319
<v Speaker 2>It's like we've been talking about with the pay Pal mafia.

2104
02:17:56.600 --> 02:17:58.680
<v Speaker 2>It's like, do I think the guys in the pay

2105
02:17:58.719 --> 02:18:02.159
<v Speaker 2>Pal mafia agree with me? Probably not. I mean there's

2106
02:18:02.239 --> 02:18:06.920
<v Speaker 2>probably maybe a couple of them. But are they do

2107
02:18:07.000 --> 02:18:10.040
<v Speaker 2>they hate me? No? I don't think so.

2108
02:18:10.280 --> 02:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And if you're young enough, especially now where everything is politicized,

2109
02:18:15.280 --> 02:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're young enough, you can orient your life towards,

2110
02:18:20.319 --> 02:18:25.159
<v Speaker 1>at least your material life towards you know, getting involved

2111
02:18:25.280 --> 02:18:29.559
<v Speaker 1>in industries that no matter who's in charge, like especially

2112
02:18:29.600 --> 02:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's the elites you think are going to be

2113
02:18:31.200 --> 02:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>in charge or you like, you can be a beneficiary

2114
02:18:35.799 --> 02:18:39.799
<v Speaker 1>of a of a of a circulation of elites, if

2115
02:18:39.840 --> 02:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>not from the current ones. That's kind of my whole

2116
02:18:43.159 --> 02:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>shtick is like, get get into an industry or a

2117
02:18:46.680 --> 02:18:51.120
<v Speaker 1>career that is circulation of elites proof. Like not recession proof,

2118
02:18:51.159 --> 02:18:54.479
<v Speaker 1>because we're done with we're probably done with recessions, but uh,

2119
02:18:55.399 --> 02:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>circulation of elites proof.

2120
02:18:57.920 --> 02:18:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh and there are a lot of those, you know.

2121
02:18:59.399 --> 02:19:01.719
<v Speaker 2>I have people who contact me all the time now

2122
02:19:01.760 --> 02:19:04.239
<v Speaker 2>and say, you know, it's like finally got myself to

2123
02:19:04.280 --> 02:19:07.520
<v Speaker 2>the point where I'm pretty sure that you know, no

2124
02:19:07.559 --> 02:19:09.719
<v Speaker 2>matter what would happen, I'll always be able to turn

2125
02:19:09.799 --> 02:19:13.079
<v Speaker 2>it and come and and I mean that's that's important.

2126
02:19:13.280 --> 02:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean yeah, a certain level of self sufficiency

2127
02:19:17.120 --> 02:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh preparedness. Absolutely, I am woefully and you know

2128
02:19:21.719 --> 02:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to have a kid and all that too.

2129
02:19:23.760 --> 02:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know that I'm telling you that episode I

2130
02:19:26.559 --> 02:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>listened to listen to today with uh cat Cat Girl

2131
02:19:31.719 --> 02:19:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Koulak kind of broken mind, just putting me in a

2132
02:19:35.360 --> 02:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>real bad mood all day.

2133
02:19:36.760 --> 02:19:40.319
<v Speaker 2>You came into the group I recommend it to the listeners.

2134
02:19:41.079 --> 02:19:42.760
<v Speaker 2>You came into the group chat and you were like,

2135
02:19:42.879 --> 02:19:44.639
<v Speaker 2>all right, I'm gonna kill myself now.

2136
02:19:45.840 --> 02:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2137
02:19:48.319 --> 02:19:51.799
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, all right, well let's let's end this. Uh

2138
02:19:51.840 --> 02:19:54.479
<v Speaker 2>where can people find your work when you do work?

2139
02:19:56.239 --> 02:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So you can find me at bt W A Underscore

2140
02:20:00.079 --> 02:20:03.959
<v Speaker 1>turns on x formally not as Twitter, and you can

2141
02:20:04.000 --> 02:20:08.319
<v Speaker 1>find me every single Wednesday live on Timeline Earth.

2142
02:20:08.680 --> 02:20:10.760
<v Speaker 2>All Right, thanks Daron, appreciate it.

2143
02:20:12.000 --> 02:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Yep, thank you for having me
