Speaker 1: All right, we are live. Welcome to sixty agenda. I'm
Speaker 1: your host Andrew, here to talk about what they won't
Speaker 1: as always, thank you for being patient with me. Apologize
Speaker 1: about yesterday morning. Had a little bit a weird morning,
Speaker 1: so I was like not up to it. I was
Speaker 1: not feeling great. So we got through it. We're here,
Speaker 1: And honestly, every time that I postpone the show, I
Speaker 1: end up getting everything in order, getting things back ready
Speaker 1: to go better than they would have been if I
Speaker 1: would have did it the day I planned on. So
Speaker 1: you can rest assured this show is going to be
Speaker 1: even better than what it would have been yesterday.
Speaker 2: So welcome, Welcome. As I was kind of.
Speaker 1: Going into some of the research around this, I realized
Speaker 1: that if you look into like Internet of Things, internetive Bodies,
Speaker 1: like a conspiratorial podcast episode, at least if you just
Speaker 1: look up that name Internet of Things Bodies, I'm pretty sure.
Speaker 2: I mean I can't find many. Mine was just about
Speaker 2: the only one on there.
Speaker 1: So if you have not checked out the Internet of
Speaker 1: Things and Internet of Bodies, IoT and iob it is
Speaker 1: an episode we did about a year ago and it
Speaker 1: covers a lot of the stuff that we're going to
Speaker 1: get into a lot of it, but a good amount
Speaker 1: of stuff we're going to get into today as far
Speaker 1: as the Internet of Things goes. That's very important whenever
Speaker 1: it comes to you know what we're going to be
Speaker 1: talking about today, which is that fingerprints, ID and A
Speaker 1: and so we'll be getting into that and what is that?
Speaker 1: And if you haven't heard of it, it's coming. So
Speaker 1: it's definitely something we need to get into. It's gonna
Speaker 1: be a pet show. Good morning everybody. How are we doing?
Speaker 1: And welcome in? And yeah, like I said, sorry about yesterday,
Speaker 1: crazy crazy, crazy, I got a little wild, you know
Speaker 1: what I'm saying.
Speaker 2: I was.
Speaker 1: Acting like I was a young man again. All right,
Speaker 1: So what are we gonna do here? I think let's
Speaker 1: it go. Yeah, I'll go ahead and get started. Welcome Jack,
Speaker 1: Welcome inside your bones. How we doing?
Speaker 2: How we're doing?
Speaker 3: So?
Speaker 1: The human body is being hooked into digital systems, as
Speaker 1: we've been talking about a lot on this show, whether
Speaker 1: it be sensors, wearables, implantables, digital ID, blockchain, biometrics. This
Speaker 1: is a slippery slope leading us into the biodigital convergence,
Speaker 1: I believe, which is a digital pre and that is coming,
Speaker 1: so we're gonna talk about that. So that's gonna that's
Speaker 1: gonna that's gonna be a fun episode.
Speaker 2: But we're gonna cover it all.
Speaker 1: So if you're headed to work, have a great day.
Speaker 1: I just got off work myself. I've been working nights,
Speaker 1: so your boys been up. So digital ID fingerprint ID
Speaker 1: is gonna be mandatory for apparel in the EU by
Speaker 1: twenty thirty. So if you didn't know that, that's important
Speaker 1: to know. So EU Apparel Digital Fingerprinting Law, the EU's
Speaker 1: Digital Product Passport is what they're calling it. For apparel
Speaker 1: and textiles. It's a mandatory requirement set to be fully
Speaker 1: implemented by twenty thirty. This law mandates that every product
Speaker 1: be sold in the EU must have a digital fingerprint,
Speaker 1: providing a comprehensive record of the product's life cycle, including
Speaker 1: its materials. I gonna know, I prec impact rather indisposable options.
Speaker 1: But a lot of this, you know, they say it's
Speaker 1: just about like, oh, we want to make sure nobody
Speaker 1: steals it in America, That's what Nike's saying. But of
Speaker 1: course for the EU, it's got nothing to do with it.
Speaker 1: If they steal it, it's got more to do with
Speaker 1: the environment, et cetera product lifestyle life cycle, Like, what
Speaker 1: the hell is a product's life cycle?
Speaker 2: Why do you need to track me to figure out?
Speaker 2: Come on, give me your.
Speaker 1: Bullshit, just bullshit excuses that they're going to give you
Speaker 1: to to get control.
Speaker 2: Right. So that is the that's what we're walking into.
Speaker 1: And by the way, I feel weird even talking about
Speaker 1: this because I found out today before I went and
Speaker 1: did this show. It's gonna blow your guys' mind. I
Speaker 1: feel like it blew my mind. Wait till I show
Speaker 1: you this. Let me pull it up. So there's something
Speaker 1: called shield AI. Okay, there's a private company and they
Speaker 1: have contracts allegedly to let me see if I can
Speaker 1: find this here here it is the United States military
Speaker 1: is using shield AI. Let me go ahead and project
Speaker 1: it up here for you and you can look at it.
Speaker 1: So shield AI is being used to track people who
Speaker 1: are calling out the biodigital convergence of humans. That's literally
Speaker 1: what we're doing right here. So now I'm a little
Speaker 1: bit worried. That's what I'm saying talking about electronic synthetic
Speaker 1: biology human embedded systems in real time from drones. They're
Speaker 1: watching and surveilling these people allegedly turning raw data into
Speaker 1: actuable intelligence with speed and efficiency. So I'm you know,
Speaker 1: I'm going to verify this as we go through the show.
Speaker 1: This is just something that I saw this morning. But
Speaker 1: the company shield Ai was founded by Brandon Sang. He
Speaker 1: was a former Navy seal, his brother Ryan Sang, a
Speaker 1: former entrepreneur and Cowcom executive, and then an engineer named
Speaker 1: Andrew Ryder and or reader and he worked on computer
Speaker 1: Draper Labs, et cetera. So anyway, the company has contracts
Speaker 1: with the Department of Defense and Homeland Security. And right
Speaker 1: here it shows a video of them I guess, using
Speaker 1: a satellite to track people, and it's got like red
Speaker 1: and yellow boxes over them. I'm not sure what that
Speaker 1: indicates or you know, it's really weird, man, So we'll
Speaker 1: get into that.
Speaker 2: Crazy, very crazy.
Speaker 1: So I don't know if you guys noticed, Well, I
Speaker 1: don't want to bounce around too much, but yeah, what
Speaker 1: do you think about that? That is insane, isn't it
Speaker 1: absolutely insane? So in the episode we did Internet of Things.
Speaker 1: It's called IoT and iob you should look that up sometime.
Speaker 2: It's on Spotify highly recommend it gives.
Speaker 1: It's funny we talked about this a year ago and
Speaker 1: everything's really fully coming to fruition. I mean back then
Speaker 1: it was like I was a crazy person. It was
Speaker 1: just a year ago. But you know, me and other
Speaker 1: anybody talking about it before then, we're just crazy people.
Speaker 1: But now we see it really rolling out, and you
Speaker 1: see policies coming and you see actual laws being had,
Speaker 1: and the tech is here, So it's not conjecture anymore,
Speaker 1: is it. So there's something called the Calie patent that
Speaker 1: I talked about in that episode. We'll go back over
Speaker 1: the Cali patent in this episode, but that's something worth
Speaker 1: looking at. It's eighteen ninety seven patent, which is crazy.
Speaker 1: I think it's called We'll go We'll figure it out.
Speaker 1: It's a Microsoft patent about human body activity data. And
Speaker 1: as we went over in the last episode, which kind
Speaker 1: of led into this, human body activity data and cryptocurrency
Speaker 1: are going to be tied together so they can watch
Speaker 1: what you're doing, and then that will dictate if you
Speaker 1: get your money, right, dictate if you get your penance
Speaker 1: for the month. So you know that with your making
Speaker 1: sure that your thoughts, your emotions, and your actions are
Speaker 1: all matching up to what they want. So cryptocurrency is
Speaker 1: going to be using body activity data. We'll get to
Speaker 1: that very crazy welcome in netfun or how you're doing boss?
Speaker 1: Sorry about yesterday? Crazy wild wild, all right, So this
Speaker 1: is what started. This was this Nike situation. I showed
Speaker 1: you guys in a different episode, so I'll just show
Speaker 1: you the overview. Nike has a patent for a digital
Speaker 1: authentication system. It includes a method for embedding machine readable
Speaker 1: identifiers directly into footwear and apparel. These identifiers are invisible
Speaker 1: to the naked eye, but they can be detected by
Speaker 1: an official Nike app. The system aims to enhance the
Speaker 1: authenticity of products and potentially reshaped sneaker culture and resale markets.
Speaker 1: The patent covers various materials and methods, including conductive inks
Speaker 1: so literally the ink could have the shit in it,
Speaker 1: magnetic materials, and grayscale color grids. It can all be
Speaker 1: read by a phone camera or a specialized scanner.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so I mean this is wild shit, dude.
Speaker 1: And it's funny because if you look here, if you're
Speaker 1: just listening, they have a picture of a shoe and
Speaker 1: then behind it is a guy with like a ski
Speaker 1: mask and some money, some cash, and then they got
Speaker 1: a phone with like a fingerprint on it. You know,
Speaker 1: it's like the app, so they can, you know, you
Speaker 1: can make sure nobody's stealing your stuff.
Speaker 2: I love how they always sell it as we're gonna
Speaker 2: help you.
Speaker 1: It's either your convenience or your safety that they sell
Speaker 1: you on for your it's always convenience or safety that
Speaker 1: you end up getting sold on to take your liberties
Speaker 1: and freedoms away. So the technology is designed to be
Speaker 1: resistant to counterfeiting, requiring a factory to match micro coding patterns.
Speaker 1: So in other words, everything's gonna be customized, like encoded
Speaker 1: to you. They're gonna know what you bought, and then
Speaker 1: when you buy it, it's gonna be yours to your
Speaker 1: code or whatever. Right, these micro coding patterns, so there's
Speaker 1: magnetic signatures and things like that. This patent is filing
Speaker 1: and it's a significant step in Nike's effort to secure
Speaker 1: its product authenticity.
Speaker 2: It's crazy, dude.
Speaker 1: So if you guys, remember I showed you, I mean
Speaker 1: there's two different areas on there where you could kind
Speaker 1: of access. You have the cloud and then you also
Speaker 1: have the Let's see if we can find it here.
Speaker 1: But you have the cloud that you know Oracle could
Speaker 1: access and track you with or intelligence services, and then
Speaker 1: you also have the actual host, the host place where
Speaker 1: intelligence could have a back door to that too. But
Speaker 1: if you don't remember it was on that other show
Speaker 1: a couple of weeks ago, you could check that out.
Speaker 1: But yes, Nephunter in Nvidia, they did announce that they
Speaker 1: achieved AGI. I saw that this morning. I was working
Speaker 1: all night. So that's the funny thing is I'll be
Speaker 1: working all night the night before and it's kind of
Speaker 1: perfect because then I usually they drop big news like
Speaker 1: that overnight and then in the morning everybody would be
Speaker 1: talking about it, and uh, it's really I should just
Speaker 1: start doing morning shows pretty often because I got the
Speaker 1: deats pretty early. But yes, AGI in Video right after
Speaker 1: they merged with was it Cloud, I think? Or who
Speaker 1: did they do a deal with? And Video just did
Speaker 1: a deal with somebody? Who did they do a deal with?
Speaker 1: Did they do a deal with Poalenteer? No way, Yeah,
Speaker 1: and Video has partnered with Palenteer Technologies to create a
Speaker 1: first of its kind integrated technology stack for operational AI.
Speaker 2: So Palenteer as their hand and everything, don't they.
Speaker 1: And I'm pretty sure in Video did a deal with
Speaker 1: a Oracle as well. Am I wrong about that? Let
Speaker 1: me check that. Yeah, yep, yep, yep, yep. Oracle and
Speaker 1: in Video have announced the landmark collaboration to build the
Speaker 1: US Department of Energy's largest AI supercomputer, significantly advancing scientific
Speaker 1: discoveries and AI capabilities. So you have all these companies
Speaker 1: working together, you know. But the thing is Oracle was
Speaker 1: funded by q Tel, which is a venture capital arm
Speaker 1: of the CIA, And so this is all just very
Speaker 1: much deep state shit.
Speaker 2: I mean, these are private companies with deep state shit.
Speaker 2: M crazy.
Speaker 1: So let's get towards what I was trying to get to.
Speaker 1: Got some videos, I got some stuff to show you.
Speaker 1: But I will tell you if you go back, if
Speaker 1: you haven't heard or I keep mentioning this. But if
Speaker 1: you haven't went back in our archives, go on Spotify.
Speaker 2: Go back, listen to you know, all the way back then.
Speaker 1: Maybe just audio, but it's worth it because as we progressed,
Speaker 1: we've discovered that cybernetics is very much connected with this technology.
Speaker 1: And Nick Land, who's a big cyberneticist, cyberpunk kind of guy,
Speaker 1: he was really big with the O nine.
Speaker 2: They're kind of.
Speaker 1: Connected with this accelerationist movement, which we went over nine
Speaker 1: A these weird cults to come out like seven sixty
Speaker 1: four and all these kids doing weird shit like shooting
Speaker 1: places up and just kind of being psycho death cult
Speaker 1: kind of people. This is all coming from the same
Speaker 1: place of the same people. They're creating this technology. And
Speaker 1: then you have somebody like Curtis Jarvin who espouses the
Speaker 1: Dark Enlightenment, which is something that Peter teel jd vance
Speaker 1: Elon Musk. They're all rubbing shoulders together, and they all
Speaker 1: like Curtis and his philosophies. Now you have them in
Speaker 1: the administration, you have the rise of all this technology
Speaker 1: coming to fruition. You have Elon Musk Dark Enlightenment, what
Speaker 1: does he call it? Dark Maga And so he came
Speaker 1: in and he was calling himself tech Support. And they
Speaker 1: used AI to go through and find the corruption with DOGE.
Speaker 2: But what do they do.
Speaker 1: They try to AI stream role the government and Curtis
Speaker 1: Drivin said this was his idea. So you have to
Speaker 1: remember these guys are all on the same sphere, okay,
Speaker 1: And we've went over the skull and Bones and the
Speaker 1: Nazi connections and the fact, you know, Elon doing the
Speaker 1: Hitler salute was not for no reason, right, And so
Speaker 1: what I'm saying is the dark Enlightenment, dark Maga, accelerationist movement, cybernetics,
Speaker 1: all of these things are connected in a very deep
Speaker 1: way the nine A seven sixty four Intel communities, and
Speaker 1: it's a dark anti human movement that is, uh unfortunately
Speaker 1: taking its rains on the power of global you know,
Speaker 1: economy and policy of governments. So definitely something to watch
Speaker 1: for and definitely something we're gonna be getting into. So
Speaker 1: with that being said, I've got some stuff that I
Speaker 1: sent myself here. Let's start out with the patents that
Speaker 1: I told you about here. So hold on here, get
Speaker 1: this pulled up. Good morning, Murray, how are we doing.
Speaker 1: So we got a garment system patent right here. So
Speaker 1: this is a different one. This is a garment system
Speaker 1: providing biometric monitoring. Now again, your movements, excuse me, your
Speaker 1: movements are going to dictate blockchain technology. Okay, we'll get
Speaker 1: into this, but the crypto gets into this too. So
Speaker 1: if you imagine a world where you have to behave
Speaker 1: a certain way in order to get paid, your universal
Speaker 1: basic income because everything's automated.
Speaker 2: Right, then the way that.
Speaker 1: Would have to happen is you'd have sensors and implantables
Speaker 1: things like that, which is exactly what we see coming.
Speaker 1: So the garment may include sensors for monitoring or assessing
Speaker 1: assessing biometric properties such as were not limited to listen
Speaker 1: to this, respiration properties, heart properties, and motion properties. See
Speaker 1: so you thought this was limited to just what you're
Speaker 1: doing and how you're moving. No, it's watching your heart rate,
Speaker 1: your respiration, it's watching everything. These properties may be assessed
Speaker 1: together to provide an assessment of the vital signs and
Speaker 1: body positions three dimensional body position of the wearer of
Speaker 1: said garment.
Speaker 2: So this is for clothes, right, shoes, clothes, You've.
Speaker 1: Got your wearables. You've got your clothes. Now you'll have
Speaker 1: your implantables. Of course, we know we have flock cameras, right,
Speaker 1: you know, but what this reminds me of, this really
Speaker 1: reminds me of this.
Speaker 2: Let me show you this, because this is what this
Speaker 2: reminds me of a lot.
Speaker 1: So you know, we've talked about the biodigital convergence, we've
Speaker 1: talked about digital twins, sentient world simulation, right, we've talked
Speaker 1: about all these things so well, what I haven't connected
Speaker 1: with this was this thing that Palante here calls the
Speaker 1: kill chain. And when you look at this kill chain,
Speaker 1: it reminds me very much of like if you were
Speaker 1: to have this technology that we're talking about right here,
Speaker 1: and you wanted to have data points. So for instance,
Speaker 1: right here in this video this is for the military
Speaker 1: that they're using, but say you wanted to have similar
Speaker 1: data points and each person right here, all these little
Speaker 1: dots would be say you me right in this big
Speaker 1: system that they've got created. I don't know, man, I
Speaker 1: think that the kill chain has something to do with it. Two, Like,
Speaker 1: think about it. You've got all these nodes everywhere, and
Speaker 1: then you could use the kill chain to go and
Speaker 1: use your drones. You know where everybody's doing, where everybody's
Speaker 1: at Geospatial Institute.
Speaker 2: Right, you have the Geospatial Institute.
Speaker 1: Which is taking all this data that they're gathering with
Speaker 1: the clothes, et cetera, and then they're gritting it. Right,
Speaker 1: they're gritting it for a counter terrorism system. Right, But again,
Speaker 1: is this domestic counter terror?
Speaker 2: Is this for us?
Speaker 1: So let's check this out see if it tells us anything.
Speaker 1: So this is geospatial home. They're probably gonna put me
Speaker 1: on a list just because I'm on here because this
Speaker 1: is for the counter intelligence, so real great.
Speaker 2: So this is for evolving mission demands.
Speaker 1: So in other words, accelerate the mission timelines with solutions
Speaker 1: for rapid intelligence collections. So you've got your see the way,
Speaker 1: you've got to read through the wording. But of course
Speaker 1: rapid intelligence collections would be we have satellites, and we
Speaker 1: have everybody gritted. We have you know, movement tracking monitors
Speaker 1: on people's clothes, we have wearables, all this stuffs hooked
Speaker 1: up to a cloud system like Oracle funded by the
Speaker 1: CIA or something like it. Right, and then they enhance
Speaker 1: the situation wal where for the government.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: So this reduces reaction times and improves operational outcomes. But
Speaker 1: in other words, it's like not good for us. Right,
Speaker 1: And then of course they're selling it with this idea too,
Speaker 1: we help reduce human error. You don't want to kill
Speaker 1: the wrong person, make sure we get you the right guy.
Speaker 2: So these are the things that I kind of see
Speaker 2: whenever I hear about this stuff. And look at this.
Speaker 1: Call me paranoid, but you know, I think all this
Speaker 1: technology comes together in a weird way, especially whenever all
Speaker 1: these people are rubbing shoulders together, starting companies together. They're
Speaker 1: involved in similar things as each other. So that being said,
Speaker 1: let me go ahead and pull this up while we're
Speaker 1: talking about this as well. Fun stuff, isn't it, guys?
Speaker 1: Fun stuff? Okay, So we also have this cryptocurrency, like
Speaker 1: I the system blockchain, King of King sent me this
Speaker 1: the other day. But then I listened to that Internet
Speaker 1: of Things episode I did in July last year, and
Speaker 1: I talked about this last year.
Speaker 2: So this is something that you know, again.
Speaker 1: I talked about this shit last year whenever I thought
Speaker 1: it was all conjectured. But now I need to like
Speaker 1: go back over my own work and kind of refresh,
Speaker 1: because yeah, dude, this is all real, and you know,
Speaker 1: I kind of came into this podcast stuff really just
Speaker 1: swinging heavy with my with my theories. So the human
Speaker 1: body activity associated with it, So if you haven't listened
Speaker 1: to the old stuff, go ahead and do it. So,
Speaker 1: the human body activity associated with the task provided to
Speaker 1: a user may be used in a mining process of
Speaker 1: a cryptocurrency system. In other words, a server may provide
Speaker 1: a task to a device of a user and then
Speaker 1: that's communicatively coupled to the server.
Speaker 2: The sensor community I love this word.
Speaker 1: Communicatively coupled two or comprised in the device of the
Speaker 1: user may sense body activity of the user.
Speaker 2: So these things are all interconnected with each other.
Speaker 1: You've got the device of the user connected to the
Speaker 1: the server, and then you have a sensor coupled and
Speaker 1: then comprised to the user so that you can sense
Speaker 1: the body activity. Body activity data may then be generated
Speaker 1: based on the sensed body activity of the user, and
Speaker 1: this cryptocurrency system, then communicatively coupled to the device of
Speaker 1: the user, may verify if the body activity data and
Speaker 1: this is the fun part. Then it verifies that the
Speaker 1: body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by
Speaker 1: the cryptocurrency system, and then it will award the cryptocurrency
Speaker 1: to the user whose body activity data is set. Okay,
Speaker 1: you guys understanding that, Like people that push cryptocurrency and
Speaker 1: they're like, oh, you just have to do an algorithm,
Speaker 1: like you just have to do a math equation and
Speaker 1: then it gives you money. Do you understand that when
Speaker 1: they they sell you on that in the beginning, but
Speaker 1: you understand what it's saying here, your body data will
Speaker 1: then dictate if you're going to be awarded cryptocurrency or not. So,
Speaker 1: in other words, are you doing what we want you
Speaker 1: to do, and then you may receive your penance for
Speaker 1: the month. So people need to kind of look deeper
Speaker 1: into what the hell we're looking at here, because this
Speaker 1: is serious. This is imprisonment. This is a digital prison.
Speaker 1: So just saying so. Virtual currency also known as digital currency,
Speaker 1: it's a medium of exchange. It's implemented through the Internet generally,
Speaker 1: but not tied to a specific government backed fiat currency
Speaker 1: such as the US dollar or the Euro.
Speaker 2: But it's typically designed to allow.
Speaker 1: Instantaneous transactions in borderless transfer town of ownership. We all
Speaker 1: know this, but what matters is the whole body data
Speaker 1: activity and what it's doing. It even talks about this, okay, whoa.
Speaker 1: So it talks about the body radiation emitted from the user,
Speaker 1: body fluid flow, a brain wave, pulse rate, or body
Speaker 1: heat radiation. So it's it's taken everything into account. It's
Speaker 1: not just your movements again, like we said with the
Speaker 1: sensors for your clothes, so all this stuff is very
Speaker 1: much interconnected with.
Speaker 2: Your your your whole systems.
Speaker 1: It's not just about what you're doing physically, it's can
Speaker 1: they can read your mind?
Speaker 2: Damn near? You know?
Speaker 1: So man, that is some Orwellian ass shit. All right,
Speaker 1: So what's the next one here? We've got Apple. Apple's
Speaker 1: involved Apple pat and uses FRT with body data. So cameras,
Speaker 1: now this is fucked up. So cameras can id people
Speaker 1: without seeing their faces. So this tech uses clothing a
Speaker 1: gate of his person's walk to more, more and more
Speaker 1: to recognize individuals in the home and elsewhere. So this patent,
Speaker 1: filed in May of twenty twenty two, it was granted
Speaker 1: in November twenty twenty four, describes a system that associates
Speaker 1: facial recognition with other body characteristics. This might include things
Speaker 1: like clothing, which would be probably yeah, of course clothing
Speaker 1: because it'll have the sensors that we're talking about gait
Speaker 1: or get gesture. And then of course to recognize certain
Speaker 1: people even if their faces are not visible to the camera.
Speaker 1: So you want to wear those like, you know, those masks,
Speaker 1: the mass that you put over your face for the
Speaker 1: facial recognition.
Speaker 2: Cameras. They're finding ways around that already. Don't worry. You
Speaker 2: can try your best but your gait is being studied.
Speaker 1: Everything's being studied, your bodily fluids, your brain waves.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's it's insane here.
Speaker 1: So they describe the capability to monitor a video feed
Speaker 1: and determine based on the analysis of video frames previously
Speaker 1: stored faces and body biometrics. It's whether it's identific and
Speaker 1: identification can be made with a primary body characteristic face
Speaker 1: or requires a secondary characteristics.
Speaker 2: So it's like, is this the guy? Do we need
Speaker 2: more info?
Speaker 1: The system might work by linking gallery of body croppings
Speaker 1: such as torso, arms or legs with their face biometrics
Speaker 1: and then compare the data with a live video feed.
Speaker 1: It precedes in a step to approach identifying face and
Speaker 1: body parts and then of course physical characteristics that could
Speaker 1: include body shapes, gain color or texture or color of clothing.
Speaker 1: So this is adaptable to the scenario every time. Wow,
Speaker 1: so the camera could recognize family members people in any
Speaker 1: suitable environment. Crazy all right? Well, so apples in on it.
Speaker 1: I mean, they all are. Why wouldn't they be.
Speaker 2: Crazy? All right? So let's see what else we got
Speaker 2: here for you?
Speaker 1: Yeah, So, and again the sentient world simulation is kind
Speaker 1: of what we're talking about with the Geospatial Institute and
Speaker 1: then building up this gritted system of nodes. In each
Speaker 1: node would be all these electrical sensors and readers, right,
Speaker 1: so you have smart dust that goes everywhere. You have
Speaker 1: the Internet of Things, which would be the wearables everything
Speaker 1: we're talking about with clothing, apparel, shoes, watches, everything, and
Speaker 1: then as you get into it, you know it's all connected.
Speaker 1: And then they build up the sentient world simulation, and
Speaker 1: then that is the biodigital convergence where you have a
Speaker 1: digital twin in this sentient world simulation.
Speaker 2: So there's a lot of these words that get thrown around.
Speaker 1: Right, but to explain it, the sensient world simulation is
Speaker 1: just the end product, right, your digital twin lives there.
Speaker 2: They can predictably police whether you'll.
Speaker 1: Do something or not right using all this info and
Speaker 1: the sentient world simulation. The biodigital convergence is the process
Speaker 1: of all that happening, which is wearing the wearables, doing this,
Speaker 1: doing that, and plugging yourself into this system. And then
Speaker 1: that's how it all works, okay. And then as we explain,
Speaker 1: each node would be like the clothing, the watches, like
Speaker 1: I said, and then of course the sentient world simulation
Speaker 1: structure would be the flock, cameras, Geospatial Institute, Oracle, the Pentagon,
Speaker 1: all these things put together, right, So these are the
Speaker 1: different parts of the system that build this foundation. Of
Speaker 1: course there's a lot more, but that's kind of a
Speaker 1: nutshell for you to see, like each section of the
Speaker 1: system all together. That's how it works, interconnectedly. Okay, crazy,
Speaker 1: So let's see what this guy's got to say. He's
Speaker 1: talking about exactly what I kind.
Speaker 2: Of just went over here, a digital conversion. Let's check
Speaker 2: it outrigins.
Speaker 3: Is being carried out with no informed consent, being forced
Speaker 3: into it.
Speaker 2: Hold on, I can't hear this fool human augmented all right,
Speaker 2: there we go.
Speaker 3: Pation and experimentation is a violation of Nuremberg Code death penalty.
Speaker 1: Why does the government want to force us into being cyborgs?
Speaker 2: Why are they so evil? Why is Trump part of it?
Speaker 1: Did you know that every politician that took the COVID
Speaker 1: vaccine or pushed.
Speaker 2: On anyone is not human anymore?
Speaker 3: There was a video back in the day where the
Speaker 3: women got shot up with the COVID vaccine and they
Speaker 3: said a demon.
Speaker 1: All right, Well, maybe I shouldn't play the other day.
Speaker 1: I don't know what the fuck I thought it was
Speaker 1: my bad I thought it was See I read the
Speaker 1: beginning of that in the beginning. Here, I'll go back
Speaker 1: to that. Well maybe I can't.
Speaker 2: Yeah, fuck that, it's all good, but yeah, in the beginning. Okay,
Speaker 2: here we go.
Speaker 1: The convergence of man biology and machine technology is being
Speaker 1: carried out without informed consent, for total control over humanity
Speaker 1: in all biological life, as a power grab by those
Speaker 1: who have convergent technologies that the masses do not know exist.
Speaker 1: This is from the real war Surviving Convergence. It's the book.
Speaker 1: So that was from that.
Speaker 2: And then he was going in on his thing there.
Speaker 1: But again the shield tracking people that are talking about
Speaker 1: this exact thing, which is fun.
Speaker 2: I worry about that. Of course. I'm out here aeron um,
Speaker 2: I'm damn Gmail. What the fuck? All right? So this
Speaker 2: is a fun one as well.
Speaker 1: So you guys, remember I had on Eric fire Medic eight.
Speaker 1: It's a badass researcher, badass fucking scienceist. If I could
Speaker 1: call him that, I'm sure he'd be humble and say
Speaker 1: he's not one.
Speaker 2: But he does good work.
Speaker 1: And you know, dude, this looks a lot like what
Speaker 1: he was talking about right here. I want to what
Speaker 1: do you guys think? And if for anybody listening, they're
Speaker 1: taking a they take a syringe and they're shooting this
Speaker 1: black like goo really and it's like a thread and
Speaker 1: it comes out and what it says. Science is beginning
Speaker 1: to blur the line between biology and technology by carefully
Speaker 1: integrating tiny, flexible elect ltronic systems directly into living tissue,
Speaker 1: allowing devices to communicate with the body in ways that
Speaker 1: were once purely science fiction. Using ultra THINMT materials that
Speaker 1: can bend, stretch, and move with cells, researchers designed bioelectric
Speaker 1: interfaces that monitor signals such as electrical activity, chemical changes,
Speaker 1: and the healing processes in real time without damaging the
Speaker 1: surrounding tissue. So these systems can even be implanted into organs, nerves,
Speaker 1: or even the brain to restore lost functions deliver highly
Speaker 1: precise therapies exactly where they are needed.
Speaker 2: Great, you know, I'm sure it's great.
Speaker 1: It's very promising, but it can also be I mean,
Speaker 1: who knows, man, This biodigital convergen shids reminds me of
Speaker 1: what he was talking about. With They're wiring you up
Speaker 1: with these synthetic fibers, so the electronics become invisible to
Speaker 1: the body, reducing rejection and enabling long term interactions between
Speaker 1: living cells and digital circuits.
Speaker 2: MM.
Speaker 1: So this emerging field of bioelectronics is opening new frontiers
Speaker 1: and medicine, from smarter prosthetics to neural implants and advanced
Speaker 1: treatments for neurological disorders. All right, let's see what this is.
Speaker 1: Let's look at it. Turn off the damn music. You
Speaker 1: see how that's coming out. That looks that literally looks
Speaker 1: like what he shows in the video, like what's left
Speaker 1: over inside of people and these bugs. That's crazy. I mean,
Speaker 1: look at that. That is insane. So remember these are
Speaker 1: fibers that can interact with your body, your organs and shit.
Speaker 1: So wow, that's exactly what fire medics been talking about.
Speaker 2: Dude. I mean, he is literally on it. I mean.
Speaker 1: I love how they come out with like you know
Speaker 1: this tech is if it's brand new, and they're like, yeah,
Speaker 1: look we're just making this, it's just coming out. It's
Speaker 1: just kind of a thing we're trying. It's finally working.
Speaker 1: But then you hear about guys who've been researching that.
Speaker 1: This has been in people and things for so long,
Speaker 1: You're like, what the fuck man, it's been holding it back.
Speaker 1: This is crazy, so very insane. Yeah, I saw you
Speaker 1: had him on recently. They had a good time, Biblical
Speaker 1: hit man.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I checked out a little bit of it. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: him on recently. Go check that out if you haven't. Yeah, insane.
Speaker 1: So one second here, let's see what I.
Speaker 2: Might have to go to X.
Speaker 1: How's everybody doing? Got my birthday in a couple of days.
Speaker 1: I don't really count, you know, I'm you know, I
Speaker 1: watched a video Prince.
Speaker 2: You know, he was like what do he say?
Speaker 1: He said, he doesn't count birthdays because then you do
Speaker 1: on age or something like. It's like a mental thing
Speaker 1: that like, you know, the more you think, like if
Speaker 1: you think you're aging every year, it's like a ritual
Speaker 1: that makes you age.
Speaker 2: And so I've just that's how I feel. But you know,
Speaker 2: still happening. I guess. You know, people keep reminding me.
Speaker 2: So that's always cool.
Speaker 1: Now, you guys, So today, I don't know if you
Speaker 1: guys noticed, I know that the people that listen to
Speaker 1: YouTube a lot, you guys probably didn't know, but I
Speaker 1: did that episode with the dude Alex from Australia Nuggets
Speaker 1: News and we talked about Port Arthur Massacre and that
Speaker 1: episode came out today and it's so funny because whenever
Speaker 1: I did the episode Port Arthur Massacre with him, I
Speaker 1: was looking up Port Arthur and then Texas came.
Speaker 2: Up and I didn't know there was another Port Arthur.
Speaker 1: I just thought it would bring up Tasmania and I
Speaker 1: was like, oh, there's one in Texas. I was like,
Speaker 1: wouldn't it be crazy if some crazy shit went down
Speaker 1: in Port Arthur, Texas just because there's been a false
Speaker 1: flag somewhere else naming the same thing, dude, And then
Speaker 1: the day I dropped the episode, I swear to God
Speaker 1: today and then you have Port Arthur, Texas oil refinery
Speaker 1: was struck. It seems like because the whole place is
Speaker 1: just engulfed in flames on fire. It seems like they
Speaker 1: found an Iranian passport. So there's some crazy shit going on. Guys,
Speaker 1: what the hell here? Let's look at this during here
Speaker 1: and fifty thousand barrels a day is what that produces.
Speaker 1: But allegedly there was a Saudi Arabian x account that
Speaker 1: reportedly posted a specific threat targeting the refinery and Port
Speaker 1: Arthur just an hour before the explosion at the nearby
Speaker 1: Valero facility in the same city. So then he deleted
Speaker 1: the post and then this happened where you have this
Speaker 1: fire going on, right?
Speaker 2: What the hell? Isn't that crazy? Now?
Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia, you know, they arguably work very closely with Zionis,
Speaker 1: so I take that with a grain of salt. I'm
Speaker 1: not thinking it's like some radical Muslims, cause you know,
Speaker 1: think about it, Saudi Arabians are on our side. Why
Speaker 1: would they come and it doesn't make sense like war
Speaker 1: with Iran, not Saudi Arabia.
Speaker 2: They literally are allies.
Speaker 1: But then in the meantime Israel, you know, as we're
Speaker 1: fighting with Iran. Oh never mind, this is from twenty
Speaker 1: twenty four. Oh he's crazy buggers. Okay, we're gonna unbook
Speaker 1: mark that. People out here trying to get you, dog,
Speaker 1: that's what they do. So we talked about this yesterday,
Speaker 1: but I think it's very important to keep getting into this.
Speaker 1: Uh sheltering from oil shocks, measures to reduce impacts on
Speaker 1: household and businesses, lockdown two point zero COVID style. Is
Speaker 1: it coming, dude? I hope people wake the fuck up, man,
Speaker 1: I hope people really just it's crazy. I mean, dude,
Speaker 1: you had like five or six years to figure this
Speaker 1: shit out.
Speaker 2: Now, come on.
Speaker 1: I mean for people that are older than me, what's
Speaker 1: your fucking excuse? And not you guys, obviously everybody listened
Speaker 1: to this, but like, what the fuck's your excuse? You're
Speaker 1: older than me, dude, you fucking didn't figure out during
Speaker 1: you know, to wait financial crisis?
Speaker 2: Well maybe not okay, Well what about two thousand and one? Okay,
Speaker 2: maybe not okay? What about? Come on?
Speaker 1: Man, there's so many different times where there's been and
Speaker 1: then in between, so many false flags. Las Vegas shooting,
Speaker 1: I can name one. There's been crazy questions about a
Speaker 1: lot of them, but nobody anything. So those same people
Speaker 1: always fall for everything, even today, all the way up
Speaker 1: until they're led into a camp or imprisoned digitally. So
Speaker 1: this is calling out increased car sharing and adopting efficient
Speaker 1: driving practices, carpool fish and driving for road, commercial vehicles,
Speaker 1: avoid air travel, switch to modern cooking solutions. So if
Speaker 1: you got a gas though, pretty soon they're gonna tell
Speaker 1: you can't cook. And again, everybody's talking about the oil,
Speaker 1: But what about the food that's going to be probably
Speaker 1: a food drought. I mean, I'm pretty sure I read
Speaker 1: a statistic They talked about fifty produce in the world
Speaker 1: will be short shortage, and I'm pretty sure I read
Speaker 1: that the other day. Let me see if I can
Speaker 1: find it. Okay, yes, excuse me. So there's a global
Speaker 1: report on the food crisis twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: Pardon me.
Speaker 1: This was last year before others started, which is actually crazy.
Speaker 1: So this is talking about It warns the more than
Speaker 1: fifty percent of the world's food production is at risk
Speaker 1: and economic damage could see countries losing an average of
Speaker 1: eight percent of their GDP by twenty fifty. Okay, so
Speaker 1: this came out last year before this war started. Holy shit, guys,
Speaker 1: that's crazy.
Speaker 2: That's not good. Let's see if this talks about.
Speaker 1: It at fifty percent of the foods at risk because
Speaker 1: of the water.
Speaker 2: They're saying.
Speaker 1: Blue water where the liquid found in lakes, rivers and aquifers,
Speaker 1: which really only makes up like what two percent of
Speaker 1: all the water of the seventy percent that makes up
Speaker 1: the fucking earth.
Speaker 2: Isn't that crazy?
Speaker 1: So I wonder though connected to this war, Warren I
Speaker 1: ran threatens fresh food price shock across developing world. Okay,
Speaker 1: so they're saying in Africa, Well, that's funny because in
Speaker 1: the four Chan predictions they talked about Africa was going
Speaker 1: to go through like a heavy famine and like no
Speaker 1: water and food. And of course, you know, I believe
Speaker 1: the four chan shit was a massad Zionist deal. By
Speaker 1: the way, I'm pretty sure Epstein was involved in four Chan.
Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure Epstein was involved in four Chan. Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein's four Chan plan.
Speaker 2: This is great.
Speaker 1: They're just using him as the scapegoat for everything. I mean, yeah,
Speaker 1: of course he was probably involved. But Jesus Christ, we
Speaker 1: know that these people are involved. The same people that
Speaker 1: are involved with Epstein are the ones doing this now today, guys,
Speaker 1: They're not your saviors.
Speaker 2: They're not MAGA. They're literally here.
Speaker 1: To cover up or to continue the plan that he
Speaker 1: had going on.
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein's four Chan plan.
Speaker 1: The sex traffickers' fingerprints are all over the early rise
Speaker 1: of the alt right and far right conspiracy movements that
Speaker 1: would follow, new documents reveal. Now, isn't it funny that
Speaker 1: four chan is where Pizzagate kind of came out of
Speaker 1: and all the drops go to a bit shoot and
Speaker 1: all that. But the guy who's like the main guy
Speaker 1: in that is literally the one who started it or
Speaker 1: was heavily involved in the iteration, like the beginning iterations
Speaker 1: of it.
Speaker 2: Wow, okay, well let's look into this, let's read some
Speaker 2: of this.
Speaker 1: So three million Epstein files recently released, we know that
Speaker 1: recast Jeffrey Epsteins more than a criminal sex trafficker. He's
Speaker 1: more than an intelligence asset or a professional blackmailer. The
Speaker 1: files also suggests he had a role to play in
Speaker 1: the creation of today's online far right politics.
Speaker 2: Gregsit was just the beginning.
Speaker 1: He wrote to The Palantinier founder and post liberal thinker
Speaker 1: Peter Teal in twenty six celebrating the onset of tribalism
Speaker 1: and the unraveling of globalization. Oh wow, okay, I've seen
Speaker 1: appeared to a view to view right wing populism as
Speaker 1: an opportunity. And see this gets in the exposure gate guys.
Speaker 1: So if you haven't heard, just for anybody new, exposure
Speaker 1: Gate is a theory that I have going on where
Speaker 1: the deep state is exposing itself. It's utilizing the conspiracy
Speaker 1: movement to its advantage. I believe now with this we
Speaker 1: can prove that some of these same people created the
Speaker 1: conspiracy movement to then use it later as at their advantage.
Speaker 1: And I believe those people you know are here still today.
Speaker 1: It's not just Epstein. So I've seen appear to Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: and I understand very early how the Internet could be
Speaker 1: used to accelerate this opportunity he had.
Speaker 2: So rather than.
Speaker 1: Simply watching this new ecosystem emerge, of course, he played
Speaker 1: his part because Epstein believes he was the conductor of
Speaker 1: the of the free world that he lived. In twenty eleven,
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein met with the creator of anonymous message board
Speaker 1: four chan. His conversation with Christopher moot Pool took place
Speaker 1: just days before the fateful relaunch of four four chan's
Speaker 1: influential far right image board.
Speaker 2: So yeah, I mean he started it right after.
Speaker 1: So in an email to Epstein, the late sex Traffickers
Speaker 1: associate former Bill Gates advisor Great Borce Nikolai was introduced
Speaker 1: to Pool and Epstein. So there's an article from twenty
Speaker 1: ten that describes four chan as a hive mind with
Speaker 1: the unique power to understand and control traffic on the Internet,
Speaker 1: and then create mass disruptions. So this is a mind
Speaker 1: Wars shit here this article describes why find moot interesting.
Speaker 1: Niklick writes, the potential for manipulation is huge. So the
Speaker 1: files make it clear that Epstein, not just Nikolick, was
Speaker 1: attentive to this kind of information control. Twenty thirteen, he
Speaker 1: drafted detailed instructions for controlling his digital footprint. So we
Speaker 1: talked about this where he literally changes his he changes
Speaker 1: the whole sex offender thing to where nobody can even
Speaker 1: see that.
Speaker 2: That was like there and what do we call that?
Speaker 2: On this show. We talked about it a lot. Memory holding.
Speaker 1: We're living in the brave new world where they could
Speaker 1: just delete shit, go hide shit. So these files also
Speaker 1: clarify around the same time, Epstein was expressing a clear
Speaker 1: interest in social media giants and data analytics. He requestsed
Speaker 1: investor Ian Osborne to meet up to set up meetings
Speaker 1: with Mark Zuckerbert, Tim Cook, and Peter Thiel in twenty twelve.
Speaker 1: So yeah, this all developed around then at same time.
Speaker 1: And then now, look, dude, I mean think about it.
Speaker 1: This is the same movement he put that He made
Speaker 1: a note that if it evolved into stormfront, I'd remove it,
Speaker 1: he said, referring to the notorious neo Nazi website. Well,
Speaker 1: it is not far from that. Through the years, file
Speaker 1: show that Epstein did not lose side of four chan.
Speaker 1: He tried repeatedly to pinpool down for further meetings. Ah,
Speaker 1: so they're gonna separate him and act like they never
Speaker 1: hung out or like got further into it. Epstein was
Speaker 1: personally browsing the side at some extent in twenty seventeen.
Speaker 2: Whatever, whatever, Okay, cool? So wow, crazy?
Speaker 1: Okay, So it seems like there's like a whole thing
Speaker 1: Gamergate ignited on four chane and twenty fourteen, So he
Speaker 1: might have had something to do with Gamergate?
Speaker 2: Is that what they're alleging? Holy shit? Could you imagine?
Speaker 1: Their rage and anti establishment energy also caught the attention
Speaker 1: of Bridebart executive and future Trump strategist Steve Bannon. Ah
Speaker 1: so yeah, so Steve Bannon the whole connection with all this,
Speaker 1: and then of course you have the gamer Gate. Wow,
Speaker 1: so this was all done by these fucking same motherfuckers.
Speaker 1: Isn't that crazy? So who started the pizza thing? Are
Speaker 1: they going to try to blame? Are they going to
Speaker 1: try to blame Epstein? On the pizza thing, Pizzagate, that'd be.
Speaker 2: Kind of wild.
Speaker 1: On the eighth of October twenty sixteen, just one day
Speaker 1: after Wiki League's first published Podesti emails, Epstein was sending
Speaker 1: their leaked files around to at least fourteen different recipients,
Speaker 1: including Peter Teel, former trumpet buyser Tom Barrick, and host
Speaker 1: of redacted or unknown individuals. Epstein included the links with
Speaker 1: no explanation, often out of context from the email threat
Speaker 1: he's responding to. So it could have been an implanted
Speaker 1: thing to try to blame him for Pizzagate. Guys, let's
Speaker 1: be real here, because why would he do that? But
Speaker 1: then yeah, we got QAnon and q drops that gets
Speaker 1: developed after that, and that's because Steve Bann and Donald
Speaker 1: Trump they all noticed that this is really working because
Speaker 1: at Epstein, this, guys, this is part of exposure gate
Speaker 1: right here.
Speaker 2: They developed QAnon. As I said, here's the proof.
Speaker 1: They were developing QAnon because of Epstein's interest and fortune
Speaker 1: and the ability to manipulate people and use it to
Speaker 1: their advantage. And they're continuing this sia and here we
Speaker 1: are every day conspiracy theorist to write I'm seeing it
Speaker 1: every single day, aren't you.
Speaker 2: So what do you think about that? I mean, this
Speaker 2: is crazy.
Speaker 1: Yes, the meta glasses are definitely mapping shit out now.
Speaker 1: I don't like the fact that it could just look
Speaker 1: at my face and do the whole facial recognition shit
Speaker 1: without my consent. I mean, come on, man, crazy Palm
Speaker 1: Beach Pete Birdman. Yeah, dude, I saw him. Should I
Speaker 1: go look it up real quick? Show the people beach Pete,
Speaker 1: Palm Beach, Pete.
Speaker 2: Baby.
Speaker 1: Let's see what he's doing. Yeah, I saw something. They
Speaker 1: counted the teeth guy. They were like, each tooth has
Speaker 1: a certain variation of how tall is whatever it is,
Speaker 1: and they were like, it's the exact match.
Speaker 2: Am I sharing? Okay?
Speaker 1: I mean he looks goddamn weird, don't He looks like
Speaker 1: he got botox or plastic surgery. And then now he
Speaker 1: looks half retarded too. I mean, my god, but look
Speaker 1: here it is. So here's the teeth. It's weird. So
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein on the left and then Pete on the right.
Speaker 2: It's close. It's weird. Maybe it is right. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Both wealthy businessmen. They both claim to have been to
Speaker 1: Epstein's parties, Pete claims they look alike from the same
Speaker 1: city in Florida, same teeth, and they both are arrogant
Speaker 1: and love attention.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Florida and not a cloud in the sky.
Speaker 1: I'm off to play some tennis. I'm not.
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein on Tom Beach. I want to thank all
Speaker 2: my followers.
Speaker 3: This thing has gone crazy viral, over one hundred thousand
Speaker 3: plus followers in less than two days.
Speaker 1: Have a great day. I was listening to his voice
Speaker 1: trying to see if I heard like Epstein's voice.
Speaker 2: Hard to tell. He might have even had a voice change.
Speaker 1: We can do that nowadays, too, right, crazy dude, he
Speaker 1: does though. Yeah, that dead dude they tried to sell
Speaker 1: as him was not him, dude. I mean, come on,
Speaker 1: get the fuck out of here, all right, let me
Speaker 1: go to the chat.
Speaker 2: See how you guys are doing. See if I missed anything.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The medaglasses thing, that's another thing where they were like, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're going to release these facial recognition technology on the
Speaker 1: metaglasses when there's a volatile event going on politically, so
Speaker 1: that what people don't come after us. Let me look
Speaker 1: that up so I could show you that they said that.
Speaker 1: Let's see let's see. Let's see, here we go. You
Speaker 1: can literally find it, just like on an Internet overview,
Speaker 1: on a it's that accessible. Meta's decision to wait for
Speaker 1: a more favorable political environment before releasing facial recognition technology
Speaker 1: and its smart glasses has raised significant concerns about privacy
Speaker 1: and ethical implications. Company's internal discussions and product roadmaps suggests
Speaker 1: that the feature would touch millions of everyday interactions, potentially
Speaker 1: reshaping how people are identified in public.
Speaker 2: Well duh.
Speaker 1: The proposed name tag feature would allow users to identify
Speaker 1: people in their range of vision and access information about
Speaker 1: them through Meta's AI's assistant. However, the rollout of this
Speaker 1: technolog is expected to be cautious, with the company considering
Speaker 1: options that would be limited to the reach of facial recognition. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure they released it, Senators, six Gate six
Speaker 1: days ago, Press made Meta on facial recognition plans for
Speaker 1: smart glasses. Yeah, people are getting hip to it or
Speaker 1: getting pressed. Three US Democratic democratics Senators. They're demanding answers
Speaker 1: from Meta over reports that the company plans to add
Speaker 1: facial recognition. They gave Meta till April sixth to respond,
Speaker 1: so we'll keep up to date.
Speaker 2: With that later. Crazy. I wonder if they responded yet.
Speaker 1: Border Patrol agents appeared to have used Ray banned meta
Speaker 1: glasses while filming protesters in Illinois during a December operation.
Speaker 1: This reporting does not establish the agents for using metaglasses
Speaker 1: metas proposed facial recognition capability. Yeah, but it's still like
Speaker 1: they're already kind of setting up the normality of like
Speaker 1: we're going to use these glasses and then when that
Speaker 1: tech is there, we it's normalized so you can frame it.
Speaker 2: Harvey, you want, bud crazy? What up? Murray? How are
Speaker 2: we doing? Know your enemy? That's exactly right. Sorry to
Speaker 2: scare you.
Speaker 1: Tratakah, you know, titty kakka lake titty kakka.
Speaker 2: Fuck y a good name.
Speaker 1: I don't like the black Bill people, but sometimes you gotta,
Speaker 1: you know, lay out the fucking info.
Speaker 2: You know what I mean. It is what it is.
Speaker 1: But yeah, don't fear, thank you, nev get in there.
Speaker 1: I love a good fight, Murry me too. Surveillance is
Speaker 1: a byproduct of technology. It is, but it's also like
Speaker 1: there could be better guardrails.
Speaker 2: I just don't think that people.
Speaker 1: People just love the convenience factor, and I think that
Speaker 1: you got to also go back to the when consumerism
Speaker 1: was really sold and really starting to become major. Now
Speaker 1: we're here seventy years later, seventy five years later. Consumerism
Speaker 1: has been sold so well. People just want things, and
Speaker 1: they want convenience, and they want their life to be easier.
Speaker 1: They got washer and dryer, they got you know, dishwasher.
Speaker 1: They got things that make their life easier. And so
Speaker 1: we've done this for so long that people are conditioned
Speaker 1: now to really just be looking for the next easy thing.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's really what it is. And now that's
Speaker 1: pivoting to your convenience will be your link, another link
Speaker 1: in the chain of your shackles. Didn't they figure out
Speaker 1: oil is actually renewable resource, basically an endless supply of
Speaker 1: it birdman, Yes, it's like a blood supply for the
Speaker 1: earth as above, so below kind of shit correlated simulation
Speaker 1: eighty three. I just watched that Godluck, don't have what
Speaker 1: God Luck? Have one don't die flick for those with
Speaker 1: eyes to see. There's a lot in that movie. Good luck,
Speaker 1: have fun, don't die, I'm sure is what it's called.
Speaker 1: Blockchain as a whole sentence, these metaglasses are mapping out
Speaker 1: our world yeah, along with everything else that like we've
Speaker 1: been talking about.
Speaker 2: They need it all to do what they're trying to do.
Speaker 1: It really does take like wearables, smart dust, sensors sprinkled everywhere,
Speaker 1: the nanoparticles, because they want to map out God's creation.
Speaker 2: It doesn't end with us.
Speaker 1: And that's kind of what I've kind of gotten, you know,
Speaker 1: the point I've gotten to recently, which is, you know,
Speaker 1: this is an anti God movement, and what they want
Speaker 1: to do is replicate his creation in their own image
Speaker 1: and they get to be the gods of it and
Speaker 1: live forever. And so that's kind of what it becomes, right,
Speaker 1: And so that's kind of why it's like, it doesn't
Speaker 1: stop with surveillance, I don't think, but I mean, at
Speaker 1: the very least, surveillance and police is what we get.
Speaker 2: At the very worst, we.
Speaker 1: Get to lose our humanity in our everlasting life.
Speaker 2: Good morning, T and T. How are we doing? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Maybe it is a fake voice palm Beach was doing.
Speaker 1: It's either that or you gotta damn what's it called?
Speaker 1: Have I seen the movie good Luck, Have Fun, Don't Die?
Speaker 1: That's so funny. Two people have asked that in this chat.
Speaker 1: Now that's funny.
Speaker 2: Uh, you all know we are not in the elites plan.
Speaker 2: We are the test and experiments.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, we are the test and experiments, and they
Speaker 1: just trial methods on us and we'll perfect it to
Speaker 1: use on their own elites. Yeah, in the engineered race
Speaker 1: that they make, right, Because that's another thing Allus Huxley
Speaker 1: talked about.
Speaker 2: I wonder if we.
Speaker 1: Could get it absturbed from all this Huxley last interview.
Speaker 1: Let's see if we could get engineering a new human race,
Speaker 1: because he definitely talked a little bit about that. Let
Speaker 1: me see here. I don't want to end up in
Speaker 1: like a whole hour long video here, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. I'll see if I could skip around and
Speaker 1: try to find something good. Was the major eugenicist, and
Speaker 1: so that's why he knew so much. Alvis Huxley, and
Speaker 1: he ended up he made a brave new World. But
Speaker 1: then he made it at the end, he made a
Speaker 1: brave New World revisited. And that's where he went really
Speaker 1: deep into like what's coming because he was like, oh shit,
Speaker 1: this is really happening like like this, and.
Speaker 2: Then he wrote it all down, etc. Very wild. I'm
Speaker 2: just reading through the chat or choose to call it, Andrew.
Speaker 2: I think.
Speaker 1: Andrew, I think what they already need is in us,
Speaker 1: we've been breathing it and eating it, and they just
Speaker 1: have to turn it on. I agree that's what Eric
Speaker 1: seems to think too. Fire Medic eight. I think he's right. Uh,
Speaker 1: thank you everybody. I think that we covered a lot
Speaker 1: of it, a little bit of current events. You know,
Speaker 1: let me go cover some current events real quick. But
Speaker 1: we'll wind down and get out of here. If you
Speaker 1: want to hit up the super chat. If we get
Speaker 1: up to five, I'll give all five of you a
Speaker 1: few months of free Patreon. Otherwise, we're gonna keep grinding
Speaker 1: out how we do. That's what we do, all right,
Speaker 1: Let's see what we got here. Laura Lumer's on a tear. Guys,
Speaker 1: this Laura Lumer bitch is on a tear. You want
Speaker 1: to see this? Look at this? Uh oh, new prediction
Speaker 1: from this crazy bitch. This soon there will be a
Speaker 1: massive Islamic terrar attack in America and the perpetrators will
Speaker 1: likely have financial ties toters and those who were sewing
Speaker 1: discord for foreignations in America.
Speaker 2: This is amazing.
Speaker 1: She's pretty much calling out Tucker Carlson. I predict there
Speaker 1: will be many casualties, and only then will it be
Speaker 1: will it may be set in that people have been
Speaker 1: conned into supporting a terrorist syop to distract you from
Speaker 1: the threat of Islam. Okay, the terrorist syop is the
Speaker 1: fucking Zionist.
Speaker 2: Not to mention.
Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, I don't trust Islam either, but they
Speaker 1: propped up Islam.
Speaker 2: That's what I'm trying to say.
Speaker 1: So what about that context that you like to conveniently ignore,
Speaker 1: Lumer But the enemy plotted to destroy our country from
Speaker 1: within with bodied conspiracy theories. Well, we just proved that
Speaker 1: QAnon and everything and four Chan was actually ran through
Speaker 1: a Zionist intel operation with Epstein, the likes of Steve Bannon,
Speaker 1: Peter Thiel, and you know Bill Gates advisor, Right, So
Speaker 1: what the fuck are you talking about? Gavin Newsom refuses
Speaker 1: to say whether he considers considers himself a Zionist, and
Speaker 1: instead it says he's a proud supporter of the State
Speaker 1: of Israel. Benjamin Yah, who's too far right. Newston has
Speaker 1: aligned himself with the j Street, a liberal alternative, so
Speaker 1: he's walking a very fine line. I think that a
Speaker 1: lot of the left is going to come in and
Speaker 1: they're going to say like, oh, we're against Israel and
Speaker 1: Yahoo just to win people over, but they're they're on
Speaker 1: the same shit.
Speaker 2: Uh oh, we got the first internet arrests being made
Speaker 2: as well. What is this.
Speaker 1: First anti Semitic internet Let's check this out, Let's see
Speaker 1: what this is about.
Speaker 3: I'll give you this by way of example, some Hanscombe
Speaker 3: felt empowered and emboldened enough to put this picture of
Speaker 3: me up to try to threaten and intimidate me, which
Speaker 3: of course he didn't do because I signed up for this.
Speaker 3: And by the way, the person that did this set
Speaker 3: a bunch of terrible things, not just against me, but
Speaker 3: against a lot of groups and individuals, who, by the way,
Speaker 3: was arrested today in Wisconsin.
Speaker 2: My point is this, though.
Speaker 3: If this person is embold and empowered enough or feel
Speaker 3: safe enough to do this for me, what does he
Speaker 3: do to a kid? What does he do to a
Speaker 3: Jewish family walking down the street.
Speaker 1: And that's because well, I agree that definitely we shouldn't
Speaker 1: be doing anything to Jews in the street, especially children.
Speaker 2: No part of me thinks that's right.
Speaker 1: But at the same time, like, dude, you're arresting people
Speaker 1: for what making fun of you. Come on, dude, get
Speaker 1: some thicker skin, bud, You're a sheriff, get with it, bro,
Speaker 1: Come on, I mean look, yeah, remember that there was
Speaker 1: like Jewish people who used to literally like there was
Speaker 1: like Nazis who would go like walk down the street
Speaker 1: in Illinois and they were like, let him do it,
Speaker 1: because otherwise we would lose our rights too if we
Speaker 1: take away their rights.
Speaker 2: It's like where'd that go?
Speaker 1: Where the whole like understanding of like you take one
Speaker 1: person's rights away, you're gonna lose yours next.
Speaker 2: So a little bit more to add to the Joe
Speaker 2: Kent thing.
Speaker 1: You know, as I said, I don't really trust the guy,
Speaker 1: and as time goes on, more and more comes out
Speaker 1: with him.
Speaker 2: Peter Teal Finance Joe Kent.
Speaker 1: We talked about him calling out Peter Teal and saying
Speaker 1: thank you for working with him or like supporting him
Speaker 1: or whatever.
Speaker 2: He said.
Speaker 1: Business partners with Cannis Owns would glorify whoa Peter tail
Speaker 1: reps the Rothschilds. Well, actually that's not true. That was
Speaker 1: the other way around. Epstein does House of Lords with
Speaker 1: the Rothschilds. Candas and her husband is in the Bullington Club,
Speaker 1: which is his skull and bones equivalent. So again with
Speaker 1: the skull and bones, So again with the push the
Speaker 1: conspiracy theories, again with the Candice owns pushing shit. It's
Speaker 1: that way they could use it against you. This is
Speaker 1: happening in real time. This is the exposure gate shit
Speaker 1: I'm talking about. It just goes on and on and on.
Speaker 1: It's right in front of us. Nobody's talking about this, guys.
Speaker 2: So you guys need to get out there and be like, yo,
Speaker 2: six years talk about some shit. Nobody does. They talk
Speaker 2: about what they want? What is it? What is it?
Speaker 2: What are they talking about? Exposure Gate? What is that?
Speaker 1: Go find out because it's happening everywhere and once you
Speaker 1: see it, you can't look away.
Speaker 2: I mean it's right there anyway.
Speaker 1: So yea up here tea. In Rome, he was doing
Speaker 1: the whole Antichrist movement. He was doing the whole uh
Speaker 1: world tour, uh, you know, Antichrist world tour.
Speaker 2: So that's cool right down the street from the Vatican.
Speaker 1: And it's funny because the Pope was like, oh, I
Speaker 1: don't like him doing that talk about the Antichrist. Well
Speaker 1: he's friends with Opus day, shut up, I don't act
Speaker 1: like You've got a problem with it, Murray, How does
Speaker 1: it go from photoshop to hurting a child?
Speaker 2: Agreed, It's the same thing with roadblocks, you may and
Speaker 2: I have seen the other day. I did an episode.
Speaker 1: There's a programmer for Roadblocks that got arrested for child
Speaker 1: porn and molestation, et cetera, all the worst things. And
Speaker 1: it's the programmers and the people making Roadblocks that are
Speaker 1: doing it. And they're making this infestation, this place where
Speaker 1: they could all go around and do what they want
Speaker 1: with kids. And what is the answer to that. We're
Speaker 1: gonna get biometric data on your child. What's the answer
Speaker 1: to this sheriff getting made fun of. We're gonna go
Speaker 1: arrest him. I mean, this is crazy. It's for your safety.
Speaker 1: We're gonna arrest him and not let him. He can't
Speaker 1: have free speeds for your safety. Come on, guys, Slave
Speaker 1: New World, Brave New World. We're in it, guys. Huxley,
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, Huxley was in the know. His whole family.
Speaker 1: Did you know that Huxley's dad was known as Darwin's bulldog.
Speaker 1: And by the way, if you didn't see my episode
Speaker 1: where I talk about eugenicism, eugenics, eugenics he's literally just
Speaker 1: this supremacist ethno supremacist thing of study of like I'm
Speaker 1: above you, Darwin. The whole process of evolution and survival
Speaker 1: of the fittest is an extension of that thought process.
Speaker 2: DNT.
Speaker 1: Larry Lumer is a advisor to Trump, so I believe
Speaker 1: she has credentials to the Pentagon.
Speaker 2: And the Noahi laws bear not com dude, But if.
Speaker 1: You go listen to the Nute Tucker Carlson episode where
Speaker 1: he's talking to the rabbi, Israel's playing a zero some game.
Speaker 2: Okay, they don't want to have anybody to talk to. Afterwards,
Speaker 2: they'll kill everybody.
Speaker 1: And that's something that came from an old interim Prime
Speaker 1: Minister of Israel. So the Iranian lego propaganda Trump and
Speaker 1: the strader of her. Mus I heard that there's some
Speaker 1: stuff in there. I haven't watched it.
Speaker 2: Uh. I don't know what they're charge of the photoshopper.
Speaker 2: I'd love to know.
Speaker 1: Actually, we should find out that was a Michigan Let's
Speaker 1: see Michigan man arrested for online post whoa online sexual abusement? Jill, No,
Speaker 1: where's the one where he's talking about the Jews. We'll
Speaker 1: put Jewish hate, since that's probably what it was. Heriff
Speaker 1: Slam's US official link Temple hacker to Hesbelah.
Speaker 2: What the fuck?
Speaker 1: Oh, now they're linking him into Hesbala so that where
Speaker 1: they could really secure it. Right, God, this guy must
Speaker 1: be a fucking Zionist.
Speaker 2: Dude.
Speaker 1: This sheriff, the top law enforcement officer to cried anti
Speaker 1: semitism the news conference. Okay, it's become normalized. What dude,
Speaker 1: These pop ups are fucking crazy.
Speaker 2: Holy shit.
Speaker 1: Okay, yes, Wisconsin man arrested after anti Semitic image.
Speaker 2: We saw that.
Speaker 1: What did they charge him with? Some pond scum felt
Speaker 1: empowered and emboldened. He called them pond scum. He could
Speaker 1: just talk out over heat once though, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: come on, we're gonna have double standards. So they skip
Speaker 1: right past it. They didn't even say what he got
Speaker 1: arrested on. Oh it says here. They did not get
Speaker 1: further details on what charges he made face. We got
Speaker 1: time to the bottom of that, didn't we. Right on, Well,
Speaker 1: I hope you all have a beautiful rest of your week.
Speaker 1: This is uh, we're in crazy times right now.
Speaker 2: I think it's just prepare yourself. That's all I could say.
Speaker 1: You know, and just get water and get cam food,
Speaker 1: get your stuff ready, you get you stuff, good with
Speaker 1: your family, you know, I mean contingency plans all that shit.
Speaker 1: But yeah, you guys are the best, and says how
Speaker 1: easy they can plant things on devices. Now, who knows
Speaker 1: what's true anymore. Yeah, like Nantyakhu said, you got a
Speaker 1: phone in your hand, you got a piece of Israel.
Speaker 1: Who knows what the fuck that means? Right, But thank
Speaker 1: you guys. We'll see you later. It's been a great episode.
Speaker 1: Just a little quick hour, a little something something.
Speaker 2: We'll deep dive on.
Speaker 1: This fingerprint ID for apparel guys. I mean it's literally
Speaker 1: a law in the EU. Go to the beginning of
Speaker 1: this episode. It's a law by twenty thirty. Okay, crazy, Yeah,
Speaker 1: thank you everybody. I have a great rest today. I'll
Speaker 1: see you later.