Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds. You are listening to
Speaker 1: The David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen. You're on Airstrip one. This
Speaker 2: is the David Knight Show and I'm Gardner Goldsmith filling
Speaker 2: in for David Knight. It's great to be here on
Speaker 2: a beautiful day before Thanksgiving, November twenty seven. You're of
Speaker 2: our Lord twenty twenty four. It's great to be here.
Speaker 2: Everyone welcoming you on all the platforms where we're screaming.
Speaker 2: What an honor to be filling in for David. I'm
Speaker 2: gonna have a great show today on a beautiful day
Speaker 2: wherever you are, talking about the history of Thanksgiving. We'll
Speaker 2: be joined by Jason Barker of The Foxhole and Knights
Speaker 2: of the Storm at ten thirty today to talk about faith,
Speaker 2: friendship and locality, and we'll get into a lot of
Speaker 2: the big breaking news. We'll be talking possible Peace's office
Speaker 2: and some smiles about Thanksgiving as well here on the
Speaker 2: David Night Show. Well, it is an absolute pleasure and
Speaker 2: an honor to be filling in for David Knight. I'm
Speaker 2: Gardner Goldsmith coming in from MRCTV and the Liberty Conspiracy,
Speaker 2: where every Monday through Friday, we get together at six
Speaker 2: pm Eastern US time or whatever time you call home
Speaker 2: and your time zone, and we break apart the news
Speaker 2: to derive long standing lessons of liberty out of the
Speaker 2: breaking news, that we can apply those lessons to future
Speaker 2: situations like those and maybe pass on some of those
Speaker 2: lessons to our progeny in a positive way. Good to
Speaker 2: have you here, everyone. I hope your morning has been beautiful, day, night,
Speaker 2: whatever the time zone, and we're going to have a
Speaker 2: terrific day today. And I want to thank everyone at
Speaker 2: the David nightteen. What a wonderful family, what a wonderful
Speaker 2: group of viewers. And of course, if you're watching on Rumble,
Speaker 2: if you're watching on Rockfinn, I will check out your comments.
Speaker 2: I mean the team here in deepest darkest Russia, where
Speaker 2: we have our studios, the team will get the implanted
Speaker 2: Russian propaganda in our brain chip receivers, and then we
Speaker 2: will look at your comments and siphon them through the
Speaker 2: eyes of Vladimir Putin, so that, of course we can
Speaker 2: continue to spread the Russian propaganda. Happy day before Thanksgiving.
Speaker 2: I know many people will be heading home around noontime
Speaker 2: today to head out with family and friends to maybe
Speaker 2: get the last fixings for the meal tomorrow night. We'll
Speaker 2: talk about the tradition of Thanksgiving, the very first Thanksgiving,
Speaker 2: which actually pertains to my family because Richard Gardner. That's
Speaker 2: where we get the name Gardner, Goldsmith and Gardner Massachusetts
Speaker 2: and the town of Salem, Massachusetts was founded by the
Speaker 2: Gardner family. Isabella Stuart Gardner the museum in Boston. She
Speaker 2: married into the family, had a pet panther. By the way,
Speaker 2: used to walk down the streets with her pet panther.
Speaker 2: The Gardner family came over on the Mayflowers. So I've
Speaker 2: got a little video presentation to offer you about the private,
Speaker 2: proper and free market ties to the original Thanksgiving, going
Speaker 2: all the way back to Holland when the Pilgrims went
Speaker 2: to Holland for a while. And we'll take a lot
Speaker 2: of your comments and get Jason Barker's ideas today as
Speaker 2: well as look at the news. Thank you again to
Speaker 2: David Knight. Remember everyone you can watch from nine to
Speaker 2: noon Monday through Friday. Head over to the David Knight's
Speaker 2: store and get ready for Christmas because over there you'll
Speaker 2: see some great items. It's a terrific store. I love it,
Speaker 2: and of course consider donating today as this will start
Speaker 2: to close off the week, close off the month, and
Speaker 2: it's a great way to show your appreciation for what
Speaker 2: David does without commercials. It's just you and David Knight.
Speaker 2: What a great thing. I see already from Maine. Our
Speaker 2: compatriot Steve Swan is there and he is saying hello.
Speaker 2: And we're gonna have some comments on the news coming
Speaker 2: up soon. We'll get the team to flash those comments
Speaker 2: up there and we'll say hi to everyone inside Rockfan
Speaker 2: and Rumble as well. Well, let's see what's scheduled for
Speaker 2: the program from our Russian schedulers on The David Knight
Speaker 2: Show for eleven, twenty seven, twenty four. What's on tap
Speaker 2: today everyone, Well, The David Knight Show today will have
Speaker 2: a bit of a newsflash and it makes the nasty
Speaker 2: people happy. We'll get into that a little bit and
Speaker 2: then we'll talk about and Israeli has been a ceasefire perhaps,
Speaker 2: And I'm going to reiterate something that I got to
Speaker 2: discuss last night on my program, as well as touch
Speaker 2: upon yesterday briefly, growing concern over Donald Trump's picks not
Speaker 2: all of them, but many of them, And in fact,
Speaker 2: there's a strange offset that came around last night. We'll
Speaker 2: give you that as one of our first big news
Speaker 2: stories where a lot of people are applauding him for
Speaker 2: one of his picks, but in applauding him for one
Speaker 2: of his picks, of course they're missing. I believe the
Speaker 2: larger lesson about the Constitution and the greater deeper lessons
Speaker 2: about peace has to do with Jay Batikaria at nih
Speaker 2: and the excitement many people are feeling about that. Well,
Speaker 2: it's tempered with a little bit of realism about the
Speaker 2: way that people are accepting an uncompromisingly corrupt system. If
Speaker 2: we can use those two terms together. We'll also talk
Speaker 2: about Kamala Harris MSNBC and Rev learned Al and money. Yes,
Speaker 2: I wanted to talk a little bit more about this
Speaker 2: last night on Liberty Conspiracy again Monday through Friday, if
Speaker 2: you want to check it out over at Rumble at
Speaker 2: six pm and at Rockvin and over at my x
Speaker 2: feed which is at guard Goldsmith. I should mention that
Speaker 2: at guard Goldsmith we'll also talk about something I didn't
Speaker 2: get to discuss at all last night, and plan to
Speaker 2: discuss this is a story that is getting applause for
Speaker 2: some reason. I'd love to get your feedback on this.
Speaker 2: Social Security is ripping people off some more non payers
Speaker 2: will get more money. Literally, non payers into Social Security
Speaker 2: who worked for various forms of government and didn't have
Speaker 2: to pay into Social Security are now going to get
Speaker 2: extra money from Social Security and they're calling that fairness.
Speaker 2: Ha ha, all right, thanksgiving us here, can't wait a Oh,
Speaker 2: it's good thing that Pilgrims escaped all that tyranny. Huh.
Speaker 2: And then we'll talk about something that I think is
Speaker 2: quite interesting, doctor Campbell and the Shroud of Turn. I
Speaker 2: mentioned this a little bit last night on the program.
Speaker 2: If we can touch on this, we will. But I've
Speaker 2: got another little something from doctor Campbell that will tie
Speaker 2: into Jay Bodikaria and a lot of the medical censorship
Speaker 2: that we experienced on things like Facebook and YouTube. So
Speaker 2: that is our schedule for the David Knight Show. And
Speaker 2: again I want to thank everyone for being there. It's
Speaker 2: great to have you here. Everyone. I am so pleased.
Speaker 2: And also, let's see if we can get the team
Speaker 2: to post up already. Our first comment from Steve swan
Speaker 2: Over in Maine, the purpose of the sixty a hasibile
Speaker 2: a ceasefire is to allow Israel to prepare for war
Speaker 2: with Iran when Trump gets into office. And you know what, Steve,
Speaker 2: I think that speculation is already slightly confirmed by what
Speaker 2: we discussed last night on Liberty Conspiracy, the open comments
Speaker 2: from mister Charmer, the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netan Yahoo,
Speaker 2: because he has said, as Anti War reported Dave de
Speaker 2: Camp report it in Anti War News, that he has
Speaker 2: said that it will allow this ceasefire, which isn't even
Speaker 2: a ceasefire because Israel can cancel it at any time. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it's a ceasefire unless we say it isn't. Oh really
Speaker 2: is that sort of like a marriage unless you say
Speaker 2: it isn't. That's right, I can do whatever I want.
Speaker 2: I'm getting your money, it doesn't matter. So I'm getting
Speaker 2: your money too, and I'm getting weapons from you as well.
Speaker 2: That's essentially what Benjamin Netnyah who intimated he said that
Speaker 2: it will allow them to focus more on Gaza. And
Speaker 2: as I said, i'm my program and I might have
Speaker 2: said it here, I think they are going to be
Speaker 2: doing everything they can between tomorrow and New Year's Day,
Speaker 2: as you two would say, all will not be quiet
Speaker 2: on New Year's Day in Gaza because they're going to
Speaker 2: do as much as they can over the next month
Speaker 2: to try to eliminate as many people as they can
Speaker 2: from Gaza, especially northern Gaza, and then they're going to
Speaker 2: try to take over and sweep through I think, and
Speaker 2: Netanyahu thinks that he's very close to achieving his goals.
Speaker 2: So we'll talk about that and get more of your
Speaker 2: opinions than I want to say again, thank you to
Speaker 2: the Russian team here as they welcome people on the
Speaker 2: David Knight Show. Fellow conspirator, I can't believe he is
Speaker 2: chiming in on X as well. So by the way,
Speaker 2: if you're watching on X, this is on David Knight's
Speaker 2: X platform, which is at Libertytarian. Please send the links
Speaker 2: out to as many people as you can during the program,
Speaker 2: and remember donations are very very welcome. As I fill
Speaker 2: in for David, I want to make sure that I
Speaker 2: do a really good job for David and for you
Speaker 2: as well. And he says, good morning, my brother. Always
Speaker 2: a pleasure, and he says liberty conspiracy with the Statue
Speaker 2: of Liberty. What a great welcome just wonderful. Really appreciate that.
Speaker 2: And also final comment that we'll put up before we
Speaker 2: get rolling here, Steve Swan mentions most of Trump's picks
Speaker 2: war with the Randhawks. Absolutely right, yeah, absolutely, it's a
Speaker 2: good thing we have the Russian team here to put
Speaker 2: those posts up. All right, let's get started, everyone and
Speaker 2: discuss something that I think might be valuable and get
Speaker 2: into this positive side that many people are applauding. But
Speaker 2: again a little dose of reality about this. The news
Speaker 2: came out last night everyone and wanted to share it
Speaker 2: on David Knight's program today. From MRCTV my work at
Speaker 2: MRCTV to Liberty Conspiracy to you at the David Knight audience.
Speaker 2: It is about Donald Trump's decision to appoint or nominate
Speaker 2: one of the signing members of the Roundstones of the
Speaker 2: Great Barrington Declaration, Jay Badakaria, involved with, of course, the
Speaker 2: Murthy v. Missouri lawsuit, which has been combined with a
Speaker 2: lawsuit from RFK Junior. They originally said in the Supreme
Speaker 2: Court that the plaintiffs, including J. Baricaria and a number
Speaker 2: of doctors, did not have steaming because they could not
Speaker 2: show that they had been directly harmed by the United
Speaker 2: States government engaging in censorship well. In fact, Clarence Thomas
Speaker 2: noted that one of the doctors could cite direct harm.
Speaker 2: She lost her position specifically because of a note of
Speaker 2: falsehood that was posted on one of these social media sites.
Speaker 2: She was nailed for that and she was removed from
Speaker 2: her job. But there's more to the Jay Badakaria story.
Speaker 2: Let's get a little theme from some wonderful musicians backing
Speaker 2: somebody who way back in the old days, got a
Speaker 2: lot of people very excited. He was, of course, James Brown.
Speaker 2: How big, good, so good.
Speaker 3: So good.
Speaker 2: I Got you.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 2: Whether or not Donald Trump will definitely have Jay Batacari
Speaker 2: at n I h, I don't know, but many people
Speaker 2: feel good about it. I see good respond sonot sonot
Speaker 2: I got you boy, oh boy. Listen to that synthesizer,
Speaker 2: I mean saxophone. And he did have quite a voice, boy,
Speaker 2: James Brown, James Brown went through a lot of Trump
Speaker 2: his life, wonderful music on that one. Definitely, I feel good.
Speaker 2: I Got You It's the actual name of the song.
Speaker 2: So do a lot of fans of Jay Bidacaria, And
Speaker 2: I think Jay Vedercarria put up a tremendous fight on
Speaker 2: many fronts, both trying to get out the facts and
Speaker 2: on the political free speech side. Of course, the Great
Speaker 2: Barrington Declaration signed in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, at the home
Speaker 2: of the American Institute for Economic Research full disclosure. I
Speaker 2: have many friends who worked there, and in fact, the
Speaker 2: first time I met David Knight in Kingston, New York,
Speaker 2: when I traveled to see Gerald Soilente's presentation for peace
Speaker 2: and David spoke there, I passed right by the building.
Speaker 2: I almost went up. I could see the building on
Speaker 2: the hill, but I didn't have enough time to stop in.
Speaker 2: It's a beautiful building. East Barrington, Massachusetts, wonderful mountainous region,
Speaker 2: very very close to the New York border, and really
Speaker 2: close to Gerald Silent's Kingston, New York well. Jay Batikaria
Speaker 2: has been nominated. He will likely be the man that
Speaker 2: is debated for NIH, and he posted on Twitter slash x,
Speaker 2: which Jason Barker calls TwixT. I am honored and humbled
Speaker 2: by President at Real Donald Trump's nomination of me to
Speaker 2: be the next NIH director. We will reform American scientific
Speaker 2: institutions so that they are worthy of trust again, and
Speaker 2: will deploy the fruits of excellent science to make America
Speaker 2: healthy again. Does anybody see some problems there? I do,
Speaker 2: because it's collectivism. It's we will do this and we
Speaker 2: will make America healthy again. It is the argument of
Speaker 2: so called public health. And Jay Batakaria did a very
Speaker 2: good job in trying to stay away from government edicts
Speaker 2: and just offer recommendations to people. He said, and he
Speaker 2: was absolutely right that you won't get endemic status through vaccination.
Speaker 2: You go with allowing or asking the healthy people to
Speaker 2: be out in the community while the sicker or the
Speaker 2: more prone to sickness, frail, infirm, older people, higher risk
Speaker 2: people stay inside, allowing the younger, healthier people to acquire
Speaker 2: natural immunity by becoming infected, not dying, but gaining natural immunity,
Speaker 2: which is stronger and longer lasting and more predictable on
Speaker 2: a particular curve. And you don't have the older people
Speaker 2: out there until the population is filled with people with
Speaker 2: natural immunity. That was the recommendation, and masks were understood
Speaker 2: by people at aie er Jay Bidikaria, the Great Barrington Declaration,
Speaker 2: those were understood by many of them who spoke out
Speaker 2: as I did from OURCTV and we got slammed and
Speaker 2: censored for that. In fact, you can't even find some
Speaker 2: of our videos at YouTube in which I discussed some
Speaker 2: of these things. They were removed by YouTube. Or buy
Speaker 2: mrctv because YouTube was going to give us a lot
Speaker 2: of strike and that will bring us to John Campbell
Speaker 2: in a minute. Actually, so, Jay Bartikaria put up a
Speaker 2: very good fight, but unfortunately he still accepts as does
Speaker 2: Donald Trump, as do many people who think there will
Speaker 2: be this great change if you just change the person
Speaker 2: at the wheel of the sinking ship. It is an immoral,
Speaker 2: unconstitutional agency. You don't fix things by replacing and putting
Speaker 2: in someone to head up something that shouldn't exist in
Speaker 2: the first place and derives its money to make America
Speaker 2: healthy again, by taking away individual choice and siphoning off
Speaker 2: people's money to feed the NIH. I'm sorry, but that
Speaker 2: is a major lesson that should be expounded and echoing
Speaker 2: from the rooftops of the Internet. I hope, because this
Speaker 2: is the larger lesson here. He might be to try
Speaker 2: to change some policies. But what does the word policy mean.
Speaker 2: It means dic tod. It means command backed by threats
Speaker 2: of government force. That's all it is. You strip off
Speaker 2: all of the accouterments to the state, all of the rhetoric,
Speaker 2: all the flowery the government is US nonsense, and if
Speaker 2: you don't want to be part of the US, you'll
Speaker 2: find out that the government isn't you, and the NIH
Speaker 2: is not you. And there's no such thing as public health.
Speaker 2: There is no such thing as public health. There's individual health,
Speaker 2: which I thought Jay Betikaria was stressing by saying, don't
Speaker 2: have government dictants, have voluntary choice to stay away, don't
Speaker 2: have lockdowns, don't shut down people's businesses. I thought that
Speaker 2: was very important, and he likely does still support those things.
Speaker 2: But by adopting the idea that there should be in
Speaker 2: any way an NIH to adopt policy, promulgate policy, work
Speaker 2: on policy for so called public health, you are adopting
Speaker 2: a giant, pernicious kenard. There is only individual health. Public
Speaker 2: health is a utilitarian construct of consequentialist philosophy. It is
Speaker 2: the greatest good for the greatest number. And what does
Speaker 2: that mean. There is no public health because there are
Speaker 2: only individuals. When individuals gather in large groups, or if
Speaker 2: government puts them into certain categories of large groups created
Speaker 2: by the government, all that does is put them in
Speaker 2: a group. It doesn't mean that they're no longer individuals.
Speaker 2: They don't melt into some giant gstalt. They're still individuals.
Speaker 2: And by claiming public health, by claiming they can create
Speaker 2: policy for the greater good, the greatest good for the
Speaker 2: greatest number, they undercut the individual's right to be left alone.
Speaker 2: They undercut the individual's right to decide for himself what
Speaker 2: to do with his own life, regarding medicine and more
Speaker 2: deeply regards darting his own earnings and income and where
Speaker 2: that money should be spent. Any idea that the money
Speaker 2: should go to the NIH means that a portion of
Speaker 2: that person's life is being taken away for the greater good.
Speaker 2: That is a sacrifice of the individual, which then means
Speaker 2: you get to the final point philosophically and logically, you're
Speaker 2: actually undercutting the very idea of the greatest good for
Speaker 2: the greatest number. Good can only be defined by the individual.
Speaker 2: It can't be defined by authoritarian people who issue dictats,
Speaker 2: even if they're trying to get involved in running an
Speaker 2: agency that has issued terrible dictants in the past, and
Speaker 2: you're trying to fix it, because it still exists, on
Speaker 2: a philosophical level, it is an insult to individual sovereignty
Speaker 2: and natural rights. The entire superstructure of the NIH A
Speaker 2: For those who are constitutionalists, and I'm a Christian anarchist,
Speaker 2: I know that a bunch of people signing a piece
Speaker 2: of paper over two hundred years ago gives them no
Speaker 2: authority over me, just as a bunch of people signing
Speaker 2: a paper claiming authority over me now would give them
Speaker 2: no authority over me either. You have to engage in
Speaker 2: consent for voluntary interaction for it to be acceptable on
Speaker 2: an ethical or moral level. All other systems that are
Speaker 2: imposed on people are immoral and unethical, period full stop.
Speaker 2: There is no way around that. That's just how it
Speaker 2: works amongst adults with natural rights. That's why anarchy, no
Speaker 2: human ruler, is the way I operate. I don't want
Speaker 2: to control my neighbor, and I don't want my neighbor
Speaker 2: to control my other neighbor. I want them to leave
Speaker 2: each other alone. That is something that I would afford
Speaker 2: to them. You have a right to be left alone
Speaker 2: by me. I have a right to be left alone
Speaker 2: by you. The NIH is an absolute affront to that. Now,
Speaker 2: Ja Betikaria will be a positive regarding policy, I'm sure,
Speaker 2: but policy itself, the existence of policy in any regard,
Speaker 2: especially in this regard, means that rights are being taken.
Speaker 2: And it also means that tautological obviousness becomes apparent because
Speaker 2: by taking away the natural rights of the individual and
Speaker 2: claiming that you can impose policy on him and he
Speaker 2: can't disagree in some way, especially to the point of
Speaker 2: not being able to deny paying for something he might
Speaker 2: not want to pay for, like the nih you are
Speaker 2: imposing an attack on his natural rights, and you are
Speaker 2: restricting his ability to be able to determine for himself
Speaker 2: what is good for himself. You don't get to any
Speaker 2: position of helping someone by threatening that person with aggressive
Speaker 2: force of the polas. So as Jay Betikaria comes out there,
Speaker 2: we can remember some of his heroic moments and his
Speaker 2: continuing efforts to engage in a lawsuit for free speech.
Speaker 2: His argument will be introduced as part of the RFK
Speaker 2: Junior facet of the Missouri v. Murthy v. Missouri lawsuit.
Speaker 2: It will go back into the Supreme Court because RFK
Speaker 2: Junior does have standing, and that will be heard by
Speaker 2: the court probably this year. But as far as Ja
Speaker 2: Betakaria goes, it also allows us to remember the positive side.
Speaker 2: We can remember, of course that Jay Badikaria and others
Speaker 2: tried to speak up for medical freedom. They tried to
Speaker 2: mention to people, you know, don't get the jabs, it's unreliable.
Speaker 2: And of course later many people started to sound the
Speaker 2: alarm and we were silence, silence, just like Jabotikaria that
Speaker 2: there was no way you could know how many people
Speaker 2: were infected because they were using faulty PCR tests. They
Speaker 2: were incentivizing hospitals, paying them to claim that people who
Speaker 2: died with a positive faulty PCR test died from COVID.
Speaker 2: Then of course we found that they were silencing us
Speaker 2: regarding masks and the jab itself and how dangerous it was,
Speaker 2: and of course the very idea of its efficacy was
Speaker 2: highly questionable right from the start, as we discovered later.
Speaker 2: As I mentioned Robert Rus questioning Janine Smalls from Pfizer
Speaker 2: inside the EU, and he said, can you did you
Speaker 2: know whether the Pfiser jabs were effective in stopping transmission?
Speaker 2: And of course she has said, oh no, of course
Speaker 2: we didn't know that we had to operate that of
Speaker 2: this at the speed of science science, which is such
Speaker 2: a logical rhetorical jumble. It's completely contradictory. You don't operate
Speaker 2: at the speed of science and then put something out
Speaker 2: without using the scientific method on it to see if
Speaker 2: it works. That's fairly obvious. So we can applaud ja
Speaker 2: by Tekaria, or I can applaud jap by Akaria. One
Speaker 2: can applaud jape Botikaria for getting involved in that fight.
Speaker 2: But I think if we go deeper into the inner
Speaker 2: sanctum of philosophy, we can see that the very concept
Speaker 2: of public health in this nih not only are unconstitutional,
Speaker 2: not allowed in any fair assessment of the Constitution, but
Speaker 2: also we can fairly assess the fact that this man
Speaker 2: worked very hard to try to get his message out
Speaker 2: and he was silenced. And in fact, I have to say,
Speaker 2: Russell Brand actually posted something that many people have seen before,
Speaker 2: but I want to bring it up, and he did
Speaker 2: it with this little bit of a spin. I won't
Speaker 2: show the whole thing, but it is Rachel Maddow and
Speaker 2: it shows you just the amazing, amazing effrontery of these people.
Speaker 2: To use that term again, I think is appropriate because
Speaker 2: they have no shame even today. She's talking about Jay
Speaker 2: Bidikaria as a quack when he was proven correct as
Speaker 2: far as how to handle the so called pandemic, which is,
Speaker 2: you can't rely on jabs to introduce into the population
Speaker 2: and endemic status. People get them at different times. The
Speaker 2: curve is jagged, it's not even a curve, and you
Speaker 2: don't even know whether the those jabs are going to
Speaker 2: be effective, which was proven right and she was proven wrong.
Speaker 2: Here we go.
Speaker 5: We also got news on other healthcare picks around the CDC.
Speaker 5: Donald Trump picked a former Republican congressman who for years
Speaker 5: has crusaded on the false claim that vaccines must be
Speaker 5: the cause of autism, to leave the National Institute of Health.
Speaker 5: Trump's top candidate endorsed herd immunity as.
Speaker 2: There, she's talking about Jay Batikaria coming in, and she
Speaker 2: didn't say his top candidate. This was before the announcement
Speaker 2: top candidate for NIH. She forgot to put that in there.
Speaker 2: There must have been something wrong on her teleprompter. But nonetheless, yes,
Speaker 2: heard immunity. And again, the only way you get to
Speaker 2: hurd immunity is not through vaccination. As I mentioned yesterday
Speaker 2: on Liberty Conspiracy and over here, briefly on David's show.
Speaker 2: If you look at Vernon Coleman's book, anyone who tells
Speaker 2: you vaccines are safe and effective is lying. He has
Speaker 2: the chart right in there, as those dangerous diseases. The
Speaker 2: slope of the of the diseases amongst the population was
Speaker 2: going down throughout the nineteen thirties, forties and fifties as
Speaker 2: people got better medicine, better nutrition, and better cleanliness. And
Speaker 2: sure enough, when they introduced various vaccines for those, the
Speaker 2: slope did not change and become steeper, so it had
Speaker 2: no effect.
Speaker 5: Best way to address the COVID pandemic just a fancy
Speaker 5: way of saying, let's get everybody sick and see what happens.
Speaker 2: Call the week. She's unbelievable. That is the mindset of
Speaker 2: her even today, and yet this was her a while back.
Speaker 5: Call the elderly. Now we know that the vaccines work
Speaker 5: well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person.
Speaker 5: A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus
Speaker 5: does not infect them.
Speaker 2: The wars that so many times, yes, and Russell Brand says,
Speaker 2: I've heard that so many times, as many people have.
Speaker 2: But it is valuable to have that video and to
Speaker 2: show it because it exposes those people very very well.
Speaker 2: So I wanted to make sure that I got into
Speaker 2: that about Jay Batikaria about how the NIH doesn't help people,
Speaker 2: it stops their ability to be able to evaluate and
Speaker 2: assess for themselves what is helping their lives. It's a
Speaker 2: similar thing. In fact, it's a parallel. It's a bit
Speaker 2: of a it's a cipher to the same argument that
Speaker 2: can be made about FEMA. Again, unconstitutional the original concept
Speaker 2: of government under John Locke's idea, and I discussed this
Speaker 2: briefly yesterday about how Locke was off because he thought
Speaker 2: that government was created to allow people to protect themselves
Speaker 2: from encroachments by others against their lives or their property.
Speaker 2: But government itself is an encroachment against your lives. So
Speaker 2: it's tautological again, but at least on the baseline. The
Speaker 2: founders embraced the idea that an authentic political system. And
Speaker 2: I don't agree with this, but this is just you know,
Speaker 2: stating their ideas Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and so on,
Speaker 2: that they thought that government, like John Locke had said
Speaker 2: one hundred years before, was valid if it was there
Speaker 2: to stop people from encroaching on other people's lives person
Speaker 2: on person attacks, So a virus would not be something
Speaker 2: in which the government is supposed to participate in protecting
Speaker 2: people by taking their money and coming up with policies
Speaker 2: that then force them to do things like even create jabs.
Speaker 2: Now constitutionally, I suppose people could come up with an argument,
Speaker 2: and this is actually as a social Aurpova reported, this
Speaker 2: was actually sort of the way they did it through
Speaker 2: the Department of Defense. They developed these jabs, with the
Speaker 2: money going out to Pfizer and Maderna and so on
Speaker 2: so forth, years before the rollout of the jabs, and
Speaker 2: of course they were failures over and over and over again.
Speaker 2: But one could maybe make an argument that the Department
Speaker 2: of Defense can develop a viral protector, some sort of
Speaker 2: vaccine if they think that a foreign nation state is
Speaker 2: going to be developing an attack virus. But the only
Speaker 2: way that they really could do that would be if
Speaker 2: Congress declared war and called up the militia and then
Speaker 2: a portion of them. It's a little byzantine. So just
Speaker 2: to stick to the basics of it, let's just say
Speaker 2: that it really is inappropriate on a philosophical and the
Speaker 2: spirit of the Constitution doesn't allow under their rules. And again,
Speaker 2: as an anarchist, I don't even think that the Constitution
Speaker 2: signed by others can be authentically claimed to have any
Speaker 2: authority over you if you didn't give your consent, which
Speaker 2: you didn't two hundred years ago. And I haven't given
Speaker 2: my consent to the Constitution either, And just because I
Speaker 2: don't run away doesn't mean that I give my consent.
Speaker 2: As as mentioned, that's mafia talk. You didn't run away,
Speaker 2: so you accept our control over you. No, who's initiating
Speaker 2: the aggression here? I am, But you didn't away, so
Speaker 2: you accept my aggression. No, you don't set the rules. Sorry,
Speaker 2: leave me alone. But the idea that the government can
Speaker 2: engage in protecting you against naturally occurring phenomenon was absolutely
Speaker 2: contrary to every principle under which the founders founded the
Speaker 2: US Constitution. And that gets us to the constant storm
Speaker 2: of FEMA. Because you might have seen that people are
Speaker 2: still very upset about FEMA. We'll get to the FEMA
Speaker 2: stuff in just a minute. Let me just show you
Speaker 2: John Campbell's incredibly beautiful, sarcastic response to continuing censorship. To
Speaker 2: round off the Jay Batikaria announcement and I'll get your thoughts.
Speaker 2: Let me know if you think that it is a positive,
Speaker 2: but it is tinged with negativity because it doesn't eliminate
Speaker 2: the NIH and that is something that Donald Trump should
Speaker 2: do if he's going to support the Constitution. If you agree,
Speaker 2: maybe you have some different nuance and you want to
Speaker 2: offer those, offer your comments inside Rumble, inside rockfin or
Speaker 2: on x and we can post them thanks to the
Speaker 2: team here in Russia. But John Campbell I mentioned John
Speaker 2: Campbell on Liberty Conspiracy, mentioned him briefly maybe yesterday on
Speaker 2: David Show. John Campbell a doctor. He's got a PhD
Speaker 2: in philosophy as well. He taught in front of nursing
Speaker 2: for nursing as well. John Campbell, the British Man who
Speaker 2: did such a good job after he himself thought that
Speaker 2: he had been injured by jabs, starting to get the
Speaker 2: information out, getting some of the data and really going
Speaker 2: through things for people, just turning on his camera and
Speaker 2: going through things with a second camera over a book
Speaker 2: or showing his screen and outlining information he was researching well.
Speaker 2: I mentioned that he's done fairly well without getting slammed
Speaker 2: too hard by the censorious minds. At Google Alphabet YouTube. Well,
Speaker 2: guess what he just posted something that tells us no,
Speaker 2: he has been censored in a way. They just hit
Speaker 2: him for wrong think. But his response to it was
Speaker 2: absolutely beautiful. He hasn't been removed, but he's gotten one
Speaker 2: of those thirty day warnings. And I would like to
Speaker 2: compliment him and offer a reminder about his work because
Speaker 2: he's done very very well for quite a while, and
Speaker 2: I hope people will remember this. Good man John Campbell,
Speaker 2: here's what he had to say, just a couple of
Speaker 2: seconds to offer you this beautiful response, and it's wonderfully sarcastic.
Speaker 6: Well, I believe we are live. I haven't done this
Speaker 6: for a few years. I thought i'd give it a go.
Speaker 7: Now.
Speaker 6: The reason I wanted to do a live.
Speaker 8: Broadcast, whatever you would call it, is that yesterday I
Speaker 8: got a YouTube warning. So I put out a video
Speaker 8: yesterday and it got one of these red strikes and
Speaker 8: it was taken down by YouTube.
Speaker 6: This was my fault, entirely. I contravened community guidelines. Now,
Speaker 6: for quite a long time, I have been successfully let's
Speaker 6: pick a word here, and navigating YouTube guidelines, being very
Speaker 6: careful not to contravene YouTube guidelines of course, but yesterday
Speaker 6: I failed and was a judge to have breached the guidelines. Now,
Speaker 6: the guidelines are very much based on contributors not being
Speaker 6: allowed to contradict official teaching, for example in areas of
Speaker 6: health from national health bodies or august international bodies such
Speaker 6: as the World Health Organization. But of course we wouldn't
Speaker 6: want to contradict will point out criticism of because that
Speaker 6: would group community guidelines, So of course you wouldn't want
Speaker 6: to do that.
Speaker 2: And he goes on, it's just fantastic, and he spells
Speaker 2: out later on, and he does it in very very
Speaker 2: very decorous, very adroit terms. A great job from doctor
Speaker 2: John Campbell. And of course he's not going to be
Speaker 2: able to have advertisers on his YouTube channel, which has
Speaker 2: three point one six million subscribers. And I mentioned when
Speaker 2: I played him yesterday, you know, I think he's so
Speaker 2: big YouTube can't remove him. But they did hit him
Speaker 2: with that red flag, and you know, talking about the
Speaker 2: United States government engaging in censorship through Facebook for your
Speaker 2: own good. The World Health Organization redefined the term pandemic
Speaker 2: in March of two thousand and nine, just before the
Speaker 2: H one N one, so called pandemic, which it wasn't
Speaker 2: a pandemic. They lowered the lethality threshold so that to
Speaker 2: call something a pandemic, whatever the outbreak had to be
Speaker 2: didn't have to be as deadly, and they could use
Speaker 2: the scary term pandemic, of course, allowing politicians to use
Speaker 2: that rhetorically to gin up fear, to allow for the
Speaker 2: government to seize more power and more money. Of course, well,
Speaker 2: as I mentioned, the founders found this entirely alien to
Speaker 2: the concept of an appropriate government. The police was only
Speaker 2: supposed to exist for person on person predation. Of course,
Speaker 2: that's what the government is. It's people on other people predation.
Speaker 2: As Tergick Bossier said, it's people trying to gain advantage
Speaker 2: over other people. And we know that people have spoken
Speaker 2: out about the source of the viral research and whether
Speaker 2: or not the pandemic might have been caused by Wuhan research.
Speaker 2: It seems pretty clear that the money that originally was
Speaker 2: going to Chapel Hill, North Carolina, through NIH and NIAI
Speaker 2: D and Anthony Fauci was given the so called pause,
Speaker 2: which I think was just a screen that Barack Obama
Speaker 2: put up with full knowledge. I think on Obama's part
Speaker 2: that he wasn't really banning again a function research, but
Speaker 2: they just used the Eco Health Alliance as a front
Speaker 2: to channel the NIH money through eco Health and then
Speaker 2: send all the people who were doing the research in
Speaker 2: North Carolina over to Wuhan. Now, whether or not people
Speaker 2: think that the result of their research at Chapel Hill
Speaker 2: and at Wuhan resulted in a virus that infected people
Speaker 2: and hurt people, whether or not they think that that
Speaker 2: was real or they don't think it was real. Whether
Speaker 2: they think it was real and it was intended to
Speaker 2: cause fear and cause harm and then inspire the reaction
Speaker 2: of the which was the end destination for politicians and
Speaker 2: the drug manufacturers, or they think it was not actually
Speaker 2: something that escaped from Wuhan and that was developed. Is
Speaker 2: those are all irrelevant to me. To me, what's relevant
Speaker 2: is on their constitutional level. They swear an oath to
Speaker 2: uphold the Constitution. Therefore the NIH and NIAID shouldn't exist. Therefore,
Speaker 2: none of the viral research should be happening. Whether it's
Speaker 2: gain of function reshars or not, whether it produces something
Speaker 2: or it doesn't, and people want to debate it or
Speaker 2: they don't. The baseline is I have a right to
Speaker 2: be left alone and so to you. So there we are.
Speaker 2: We're done. You don't have to argue anymore about what
Speaker 2: the result of it was. One does not need to
Speaker 2: expend energy on it. However, in doing so, I think
Speaker 2: it is worthwhile investigating some of these corrupt channels of
Speaker 2: money like the EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Dazak and actually
Speaker 2: look into the Wuhan information. I think people are interested
Speaker 2: in it. I think it shows some very nefarious individuals
Speaker 2: and their lies. And again, Jay Batikaria did a fantastic
Speaker 2: job in trying to stand up for traditional medicine against
Speaker 2: a maelstrom of government censorship. But again, the idea of
Speaker 2: the public health concept actually undercuts our ability to decide
Speaker 2: and a judge for ourselves, just like FEMA. So let's
Speaker 2: talk about FEMA right now, because FEMA is the constant storm.
Speaker 2: And I'm going to tie this into something that will
Speaker 2: bring us into some of the war information. But I
Speaker 2: want to show you what is happening for still for
Speaker 2: victims of Hurricane Helene. They're not happy about this, and
Speaker 2: they are speaking up about the United States government pushing
Speaker 2: with new proposals to send even more money out to
Speaker 2: Ukraine while this is going on. Matt van Swall writes,
Speaker 2: watch as FEMA officials blame the victims of Hurricane Helen
Speaker 2: for not wanting to come out of their tents as
Speaker 2: the reason they're not helping them, literally blaming the victims.
Speaker 2: This is despicable.
Speaker 9: Officer Jeremy Slinker says it's not realistic to put an
Speaker 9: exact date on when all eligible families will be placed
Speaker 9: into housing.
Speaker 10: We're very hopeful that it will be in the coming months.
Speaker 9: We've previously reported on many residents in the Mountains living
Speaker 9: intents since Helene. Slinker says they are routinely checking in
Speaker 9: on those people and offering transitional sheltering assistance.
Speaker 10: If someone wants to come out of their tent, we
Speaker 10: will find a way. Working with whether it's a FEMA
Speaker 10: solution or whether the State of North Carolina has a solution,
Speaker 10: or one of our voluntary organizations has a solution, we
Speaker 10: would find that.
Speaker 9: He says, they're finding that a number of people are
Speaker 9: wanting to stay intense.
Speaker 10: That's where they're from, that's where they live. They're worried
Speaker 10: about their property, and if they're not on their property,
Speaker 10: somebody coming in and looting it or taking things.
Speaker 9: Deputy Assistant Administrator Julia Mauleanes is they are also residents
Speaker 9: who have declined the option to be housed.
Speaker 11: More than one thousand survivors here in North Carolina have
Speaker 11: declined housing for various reasons.
Speaker 9: But for families who have been approved for housing, it
Speaker 9: can take time. Slinker says they have to evaluate the
Speaker 9: size of the family and make sure they can keep
Speaker 9: them in the area they're from.
Speaker 6: We may have a.
Speaker 10: Place for them, but it's not somewhere where they would
Speaker 10: want to go. It may be they want to remain
Speaker 10: in their school district for their kids, or they work there,
Speaker 10: or you know, they're like all of us, they're from
Speaker 10: there and they don't want to leave.
Speaker 9: In some cases, people can get housing on their private property.
Speaker 11: We have to ensure that we can access the site,
Speaker 11: that the site has enough space for the unit, that
Speaker 11: the home can be connected to all utilities.
Speaker 9: Slinker says they are committed to being here until every
Speaker 9: family has a safe and sanitary place to live, but
Speaker 9: the first step to get there is by applying for assistance.
Speaker 9: You can find that link on our website at WOS
Speaker 9: dot com.
Speaker 2: In Ashville.
Speaker 9: I'm Taylor Thompson News thirteen.
Speaker 2: All right, well, there you go, and it's a really
Speaker 2: sad situation for so many of those people. But again,
Speaker 2: hopefully it doesn't sound cold hearted or hard hearted to
Speaker 2: mention that FEMA is a patently obviously unconstitutional agency. And
Speaker 2: if we're looking at storm damage, what FEMA actually represents
Speaker 2: is a constant mailstrom taking away our money and our
Speaker 2: opportunities to be able to fend for ourselves and decide
Speaker 2: for ourselves what betters our life and protects us. By
Speaker 2: removing our ability to be able to save and invest
Speaker 2: in things, they actually make it more risky for our lives.
Speaker 2: If you look at private industry versus government in areas
Speaker 2: like the tsunami victims out in the Pacific, private industy
Speaker 2: hotel owners got in and took care of things much
Speaker 2: more rapidly than government. Look at Hawaii, look at East Palestine.
Speaker 2: The government slow response, slow response, slow response, and in
Speaker 2: addition to drawing away individual evaluation and ability to be
Speaker 2: able to prepare for oneself and help a neighbor. There's
Speaker 2: that terrific book by Marvin Alaski which is called The
Speaker 2: Tragedy of American Compassion, and in it he shows just
Speaker 2: like Alexei Detakfel wrote in the early eighteen hundreds, he
Speaker 2: shows private initiative and how private initiative and local communities
Speaker 2: and respect and reputation helped people and wanted and people
Speaker 2: wanted to show their reciprocation amongst their neighbors with whom
Speaker 2: they would be associating for years. That's how many of
Speaker 2: these civic groups like four h and the Lions Club
Speaker 2: and the Rotary started. As those civic groups grew, we
Speaker 2: see them, we see the history of these as as
Speaker 2: a Marvin Alaski brought up, they were people who lived
Speaker 2: near each other, and they said, you know, we all
Speaker 2: helped out with for example, Tom and Jill's barn burned
Speaker 2: down and we went and helped them rebuild it. And
Speaker 2: then for years afterwards they were bringing us milk and corn,
Speaker 2: and then they came and helped us out when we
Speaker 2: had this flood over at the corner of such and such,
Speaker 2: they reciprocated. It's person on person, not officious. You're not
Speaker 2: going up to some plexiglass office and taking a number
Speaker 2: and waiting in an office with some perpetually paid government
Speaker 2: unionized employee who claims they're helping you and that they care. Well,
Speaker 2: they're getting paid regardless of whether they care, so we
Speaker 2: don't know whether they really care. The politicians are taking
Speaker 2: other people's money, so we don't know whether they really care.
Speaker 2: And the tax beayers have to pay or they'll go
Speaker 2: to jail, so we don't know whether they really care.
Speaker 2: So anything the government does, we can't actually say A
Speaker 2: and Erica cares about those people. We can't say that.
Speaker 2: It's a literal impossibility. Logically speaking, the only way that
Speaker 2: care can be shown is through volition, individual choice, individual morals,
Speaker 2: and decisions over how much do I give to whom
Speaker 2: do I give? What is the response that I would
Speaker 2: like to see based on how that person responds to me,
Speaker 2: will I give to that person again? All of these
Speaker 2: things were decided and adjudged by people years ago in
Speaker 2: those civic groups, and then they became very prosperous. They
Speaker 2: had enough left over to be able to help out
Speaker 2: people who weren't even parts of their groups. I was
Speaker 2: helped by the Rotary International to go to Australia to
Speaker 2: visit with Australians in Queensland. Now, I know some people
Speaker 2: think that the Rotary is a little too internationalist. But
Speaker 2: it's an example of small civic groups getting involved and
Speaker 2: helping each other and the amazing leveraging power that that has,
Speaker 2: especially for people who are amongst each other and are neighbors,
Speaker 2: and they have that reputation to a poll, that's extremely important.
Speaker 2: The larger the area of control, the less personal it becomes,
Speaker 2: the less addressable it becomes, and the less information you have.
Speaker 2: So perhaps I might think that helping people in this
Speaker 2: particular area would be good, and I might want to donate.
Speaker 2: If I find that the organization to which I donated
Speaker 2: was wasting money, then I wouldn't give to them again.
Speaker 2: Or if I found that they were sending something to
Speaker 2: a place that I didn't want it sent, I might
Speaker 2: go to a different place that maybe spiritually was more
Speaker 2: connected with Christianity. Or maybe I want to help people
Speaker 2: who are writers because I'm a writer want to help
Speaker 2: people out. There are musicians groups that help out poor
Speaker 2: musicians and give them instruments. I knew some people who
Speaker 2: had their instruments stolen. There were a Swedish punk band
Speaker 2: and their guitars were stolen and they were able to
Speaker 2: turn to this group that allows for bands to be
Speaker 2: able to get free instruments and emergencies. That's a band
Speaker 2: of musicians. So these sorts of things of they foster
Speaker 2: good relationships with neighbors. And we see that here with
Speaker 2: David Knight's program, with you contributing over on Rockfin. I
Speaker 2: see already we have a contribution to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: And I want to thank Carlos Rex. David Knights received
Speaker 2: a tip of five dollars over. Thank you very much, Carlos.
Speaker 2: So what would happen if the government took our money
Speaker 2: to spend it on things like, oh, I don't know,
Speaker 2: broadcasting like NPR. We would all argue about it. Many
Speaker 2: people might be satisfied with NPR, they might like those
Speaker 2: ridiculous documentaries Ken Burns made, and many people might not.
Speaker 2: They might recognize how biased the Civil War documentary was
Speaker 2: towards the North, and they might not want their money
Speaker 2: going there. Why can't we have choice? Why can't we
Speaker 2: have freedom? And this is the thing with the so
Speaker 2: called aid to natural disasters, It is a constant storm
Speaker 2: that undercuts our ability to respond. And of course, if
Speaker 2: we see private initiative, there's a reason that that money
Speaker 2: should remain in the bank. It needs to be leveraged
Speaker 2: so that people can invest in new things, in R
Speaker 2: and D or in protecting their investments. So that's a
Speaker 2: very important thing. Then, of course you get to federal
Speaker 2: flood insurance. John Stossel has done a great job talking
Speaker 2: about federal flood insurance and what a boondoggle that is.
Speaker 2: A man named Wally Stickney from New Hampshire. I got
Speaker 2: to know Wally when I was doing radio here. He
Speaker 2: worked in the George H. W. Bush administration in FEMA,
Speaker 2: and he said, hey, Guard, I'll tell you the way
Speaker 2: it works in many of these areas, especially places like
Speaker 2: North Dakota where is it the Red River floods. Almost
Speaker 2: you know, every year or every few years, people in
Speaker 2: those areas game the system. They take their old furniture,
Speaker 2: bring it down to the lower levels of their homes
Speaker 2: where they know that they can then cite it for
Speaker 2: being flood damaged and they'll get paid and they will
Speaker 2: replace their old furniture with new furniture. He says, I've
Speaker 2: seen it happen over and over again. So those are
Speaker 2: the unproductive results of an already immoral system. And so
Speaker 2: if we look at that, we can see that some
Speaker 2: people are very upset about what's been going on in
Speaker 2: the flood zones, and curiously enough, we're seeing some people
Speaker 2: over in England who are getting very upset about something similar.
Speaker 2: Want to turn to chay Bos who's actually in Russia
Speaker 2: and reports for the evil RT, because he's expressing some
Speaker 2: indignation on as many people in the flood zones. Here
Speaker 2: the government of Britain spending more and more money to
Speaker 2: send it over to Ukraine. So let's see chay Bo's
Speaker 2: and see what chay Bo's had to say. As he says,
Speaker 2: I asked the British ambassador to Russia why his government
Speaker 2: is happy to spend hundreds of millions to escalate the
Speaker 2: war in Ukraine and kill Russians. He was summoned as
Speaker 2: another British diplomat was thrown out of Russia for spying.
Speaker 2: He said. I also asked him why his embassy is
Speaker 2: being used as an intelligence base to undermine the Russian Federation,
Speaker 2: all while British pensioners freeze to death because his government
Speaker 2: took away their fuel benefits and he ran away. So
Speaker 2: again it's a bit of a mixing, because again it's
Speaker 2: not appropriate for the government to be taking people's money
Speaker 2: to supply it for protection against cold weather for anybody.
Speaker 2: It's just inappropriate to take the money in the first place,
Speaker 2: but I definitely understand the added insult of taking the
Speaker 2: money that they claim is going to be used to
Speaker 2: help people, and then, under the auspices of so called
Speaker 2: your defense, giving it to Ukraine in a conflict that
Speaker 2: was inspired by Western aggression over decades and the overthrow
Speaker 2: of the Ukrainian government in late twenty thirteen and twenty fourteen.
Speaker 2: So here's jay bos in Russia trying to get a
Speaker 2: word in with the new British ambassador because the other
Speaker 2: one was removed for spying.
Speaker 12: Oser, could you answer some questions for Russian today? What
Speaker 12: do you think about him? As the embassy been used
Speaker 12: as an intelligence space? Sorry, sir, will you answer some
Speaker 12: questions for the British people? Do the British people need
Speaker 12: to have some answers about where you're escalating the war
Speaker 12: and your claims are why can you spend one hundreds
Speaker 12: of millions of pounds to kill Russian citizens but you
Speaker 12: won't pay for pensions fuel?
Speaker 2: Sir?
Speaker 12: Can you answer that question, sir? Why you're spending or
Speaker 12: but you won't spend money to pay for pension's fuel.
Speaker 12: Is that appropriate? Are you proud of that?
Speaker 2: Sir? Good job chay Bo's you know, and again uh
Speaker 2: I have disagreements there with him about the appropriateness of
Speaker 2: government taking anyone's money in the first place, but of
Speaker 2: course sentimentally, you know, the British, they have this idea
Speaker 2: that the government should be there with their National Health Service,
Speaker 2: which is an absolute boondoggle. And just a few years
Speaker 2: ago they were exposed for emails to each other about
Speaker 2: trying to hide information that they were going to have
Speaker 2: to close some offices medical offices because they were so
Speaker 2: overbudgeted and overstaffed and they didn't have enough money coming
Speaker 2: in already with their giant bloated budgets. Absolutely absolutely crazy.
Speaker 2: You look at Matt Hancock and his deceptiveness claiming, you know,
Speaker 2: his crocodile tears when they got the jabs, knowing that
Speaker 2: the jabs were not proven to be effective in any way,
Speaker 2: knowing that they hadn't been shown to have been safe,
Speaker 2: and then bringing in medazlan, which is absolutely dangerous and
Speaker 2: likely was used to kill a lot of pensioners in
Speaker 2: the UK. And Matt Hancock later who was the man
Speaker 2: who talked about separating, keeping apart, not having contact with people.
Speaker 2: Being caught on camera in an elevator with his paramour, yes,
Speaker 2: having an affair and feeling her up. Just unbelievable. Man.
Speaker 2: The same man, Matt Hancock, by the WHO, when I
Speaker 2: was in England, promoted the canard of hoof and Mouth
Speaker 2: around two thousand and two, I think it was, And
Speaker 2: I literally was at Heathrow Airport watching the television and
Speaker 2: they were going to shut down the airports because they
Speaker 2: were afraid that people who had walked through the Midlands
Speaker 2: might have tracked some infected soil onto their shoes and
Speaker 2: they didn't want it tracked everywhere. It was utterly false.
Speaker 2: They ended up culling thousands and thousands and thousands of
Speaker 2: heads of cattle and sheep, unbelievable destruction for the farmers.
Speaker 2: Akin to a bubble of the enclosure movement of the
Speaker 2: royals back in the sixteen hundred and seventeen hundreds in
Speaker 2: England as the royal system started to shut down. So
Speaker 2: chay Bo's. You can watch jay Bo's on Russia today.
Speaker 2: He's got a program. It's a half hour show and
Speaker 2: it's terrific. It's a lot of fun called Moscow Mules,
Speaker 2: and I have shown many segments of Moscow Mules. In fact,
Speaker 2: I've recorded some on Sunday on my recording system because
Speaker 2: I wanted to show it on Liberty Conspiracy. J Bos
Speaker 2: He's actually a stand up comic from Ireland, but he
Speaker 2: does very good work in covering the news and he
Speaker 2: mixes humor with the information on Moscow Mules. So let's
Speaker 2: mix a little music right now, everybody on the David
Speaker 2: Knight Show, Let's pause for a minute and reflect again
Speaker 2: as we look at all this intense news. Let's reflect
Speaker 2: again that it's the holiday season and I am very
Speaker 2: grateful to be filling in for David. It's absolutely wonderful
Speaker 2: to be here, and so I would like to offer
Speaker 2: some of the wonderful music that David Knight put together
Speaker 2: for Christmas time as it approaches. Here is, of course,
Speaker 2: some of the music that you might know very well
Speaker 2: from the Peanuts. It's Christmas Charlie Brown, Charlie Brown, Christmas,
Speaker 2: brought to you by, of course, the David Knight Show.
Speaker 13: S you're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: And I can heartily recommend that Christmas album. It is
Speaker 2: just so good to listen to, to put on in
Speaker 2: the background, just brings back wonderful memories. It evokes warm feelings,
Speaker 2: and of course it comes from a man you can
Speaker 2: think about David Knight, and you can his whole family,
Speaker 2: wonderful people. I'll never forget meeting David and Karen and
Speaker 2: Travis and Kingston, New York at Gerald Salente's gathering where
Speaker 2: David was speaking, and what wonderful people they were. It
Speaker 2: was getting cold. We took a picture in very dim light,
Speaker 2: David and I looking up at the camera. It was wonderful.
Speaker 2: It was just great. So thank you to everyone who's watching,
Speaker 2: and again, thank you to the David nineteen wonderful people.
Speaker 2: And I also want to thank the people at MRCTV.
Speaker 2: I wrote an article last night. It was about a
Speaker 2: thousand word article for MRCTV because I knew I was
Speaker 2: going to be doing the show for David today from
Speaker 2: nine to noon, and I wanted to make sure that
Speaker 2: the editors had it because I knew they would be
Speaker 2: leaving in Washington at noontime. So we'll talk about that
Speaker 2: later in the show. And at ten thirty, Jason Barker,
Speaker 2: one of the great people we've met through this wonderful
Speaker 2: association at the David Knights Show and his ministry here,
Speaker 2: Jason bark will be joining us. He have Knights of
Speaker 2: the Storm and the Foxhole and we'll be talking a
Speaker 2: little bit about Thanksgiving and we'll go through some of
Speaker 2: the history of Thanksgiving shortly. But let's get back to intensity.
Speaker 2: Let's talk not just about the holidays, but about preserving
Speaker 2: freedom and about again that strange differential as people look
Speaker 2: at the money being spent that they think, maybe you know,
Speaker 2: I contributed to this. I was forced to pay for this.
Speaker 2: These pensioners, they're forced to pay into it over in England.
Speaker 2: How about those people who are forced to pay for
Speaker 2: FEMA and yet yes, they want to spend more money
Speaker 2: on Ukraine. Let's talk war and get some word from
Speaker 2: Edwin Starr.
Speaker 14: What excellent stuff, excellent stuff, Edwin Starr. Can't go wrong.
Speaker 2: Can't go wrong with Edwin Starr. What a voice. Got
Speaker 2: some good soulful stuff from James Brown and uh hey,
Speaker 2: we've got a lot of JB's. James Brown, Jay Boutikaria
Speaker 2: and Jason Barker. We've got a lot of JB's. Can
Speaker 2: you hear me? JB And James Brown's band used to
Speaker 2: be called the JB's, weren't they, So he had James Brown,
Speaker 2: the JB's, Jabotikaria and Jason Barker. Wow, I guess uh.
Speaker 2: The David Night Show is brought to you by the
Speaker 2: letters J and the letters and the letter B today
Speaker 2: like Sesame Street, by the way. I I saw Sesame
Speaker 2: Street the first year it started, and many people aren't
Speaker 2: familiar with this, and even though it's public television, I
Speaker 2: do have a warm spot in my heart for the
Speaker 2: original Sesame Street, and you know, some of the people
Speaker 2: who are on there, and the ingenuity and creativity of
Speaker 2: Jim Henson and the Muppets and so on. Oscar the
Speaker 2: Grouch originally was orange, and I actually have a record,
Speaker 2: one of those Sesame Street records that was released that
Speaker 2: shows Oscar Grouch as orange. But they changed Oscar the
Speaker 2: Grouch to green because they realized they were putting it
Speaker 2: out in color. But they realized a lot of people
Speaker 2: still had black and white televisions and orange didn't show
Speaker 2: as well in the gray scale as green did. So
Speaker 2: that's quite interesting that they went to that specificity to
Speaker 2: recognize that very quickly. That's interesting somebody must have noticed
Speaker 2: it on the monitor or maybe compared. That's the only
Speaker 2: thing I can think of. Well, let's compare United States
Speaker 2: FEMA response to the United States Ukraine response. And yes,
Speaker 2: we'll get aboard with some of the people who are
Speaker 2: very critical, and I think appropriately so, about the fact
Speaker 2: that their tax money has been taken to fund FEMA,
Speaker 2: even though it shouldn't exist. It's not government to protect
Speaker 2: you against naturally occurring phenomenon or subsidize you to go
Speaker 2: and live in a place again. Like John Stossel showed
Speaker 2: with his beach house where you had it all paid for.
Speaker 2: After it was wiped out, government came in gave him
Speaker 2: more money to build in the exact same spot, which
Speaker 2: is reckless. Causes a lot of people to live in
Speaker 2: places where they shouldn't if they had to get regular
Speaker 2: private insurance. And that's a waste of resources, not only
Speaker 2: our tax resis, but resources to build those houses. See
Speaker 2: them destroyed and then brought back again. It's ridiculous. Let's
Speaker 2: talk about the waste of resources going to Ukraine right now.
Speaker 2: And by the way, everybody you'll see here at the
Speaker 2: Anti War website, Scott Horton's book provoked being promoted great book,
Speaker 2: and I was hoping Scott could join us today but
Speaker 2: didn't hear back. So I think that Scott will join
Speaker 2: me on Liberty Conspiracy for a future program sometime at
Speaker 2: six pm. We'll give you the heads up for my feet.
Speaker 2: That's at Guard Goldsmith. But let's take a look at this.
Speaker 2: Biden asks Congress to authorize twenty four billion dollars more
Speaker 2: to spend on Ukraine. Now, sentimentally speaking, I think that
Speaker 2: that is an absolute affront to many of those people
Speaker 2: who are going to be suffering cold and wet and
Speaker 2: unhealthy conditions because the United States government promised them that
Speaker 2: they would help, and they have not helped in those
Speaker 2: flood zones. But in addition to that, there's I think
Speaker 2: the longer term lesson that can be drawn from this,
Speaker 2: which is that the US government is not at war.
Speaker 2: It has no allies. These are just basic technical terms.
Speaker 2: It has no allies. It is not supposed to be
Speaker 2: sending weapons to foreign countries or sending money to foreign countries.
Speaker 2: That's it. I don't swear no to the Constitution. I
Speaker 2: drive around in my car and listen to punk rock.
Speaker 2: But this is a very clear point that I can
Speaker 2: bring up to the constitutionalists and those who support Donald
Speaker 2: Trump might want to remember that when he stands for
Speaker 2: supposedly bringing peace to Ukraine, and yet he brings mister
Speaker 2: Sebastian Gorka in, who is an absolute Ukraine Hawk, and
Speaker 2: he wants to continue sending weapons to Israel. Biden now
Speaker 2: asks Congress to authorize twenty four billion dollars more to
Speaker 2: spend on Ukraine. Perhaps he worries that mister Trump is
Speaker 2: going to decrease that the White House wants eight billion
Speaker 2: dollars to purchase weapons for Ukraine and sixteen billion to
Speaker 2: replenish US arms. So you can see, just like here,
Speaker 2: Starmer is insulting so many of those people who thought
Speaker 2: that maybe the government was taking their money to give
Speaker 2: them money in their old age as pensioners. Now they
Speaker 2: can't understand why are our pensions being cut when you're
Speaker 2: sending billions over the course of a couple years in
Speaker 2: British pounds to Ukraine and sending weapons there Like the
Speaker 2: storm shadow. The Biden administration, according to Dave DeCamp, who's
Speaker 2: absolutely great, has asked Congress to approve twenty four billion
Speaker 2: dollars in additional spending on Ukraine as it's working to
Speaker 2: ramp up the proxy war as much as possible. During
Speaker 2: President Biden's final weeks in office, Politico pro obtained a
Speaker 2: request from the White House's Office of Management and Budget
Speaker 2: that asked Congress to include additional Ukraine spending and a
Speaker 2: continuing resolution that's expected to be voted on next month.
Speaker 2: Two Congressional aids said Congress received the proposal on Monday.
Speaker 2: The request asked for eight billion dollars for the Ukraine's
Speaker 2: Security Assistance Initiative, a form of military aid that allows
Speaker 2: the US to purchase weapons for Ukraine, and sixteen billion
Speaker 2: dollars to replace US military equipment that's been sent to Ukraine. Boy,
Speaker 2: we are a long way away from Lexington and conquered
Speaker 2: people's private weapons, even private cannons being used in a
Speaker 2: militia of citizen military. Aren't we a perpetual war machine
Speaker 2: with all sorts of weapons and money going to military
Speaker 2: industrial complex people. I guess Christmas is going to be
Speaker 2: good for them. And now the new governor of New Hampshire,
Speaker 2: Kelly aod And I want to bring this up again.
Speaker 2: You might have heard me mention this on Liberty Conspiracy.
Speaker 2: She was on the board of BAE Systems, a defense contractor.
Speaker 2: At the same time she was on the board of
Speaker 2: Fox News, and she had the audacity to go on
Speaker 2: to Fox News to talk about how they needed to
Speaker 2: send more weapons to Ukraine, and Fox News never once
Speaker 2: mentioned this massive, towering olympus. Mond's conflict of interest just stunning,
Speaker 2: absolutely amazing how far people have come from all of
Speaker 2: that original concept of a citizen militia of smaller, decentralized government.
Speaker 2: But this is where the underlying philosophical error of government
Speaker 2: is put on you for your protection comes in, because
Speaker 2: that opens the door if people are unwilling to call
Speaker 2: into question the aggressive nature of that very concept that
Speaker 2: people can tell you they can take your money for
Speaker 2: your protection, well then it opens the door to all
Speaker 2: of this stuff because they come up with all these
Speaker 2: different rationales that say, it's for your protection, it's for
Speaker 2: your health care protection, it's for your protection against terrorism.
Speaker 2: We've got to spy on you, we've got to censor
Speaker 2: you for your protection. We've got to take your money
Speaker 2: and give it to Ukrainians, we've got to open up
Speaker 2: bio weapons plants and Ukraine. With Barack Obama and Dick
Speaker 2: Lugar going there around two thousand and five, two thousand
Speaker 2: and six. There's your protection. We've got to overthrow the
Speaker 2: government of Yanikovich. For your protection. We've got to support
Speaker 2: Israel because supposedly they're America's greatest ally for your protection.
Speaker 2: When do you get to decide that you don't because
Speaker 2: it's a protection racket. Biden is just part of a
Speaker 2: long series of abuses, as Thomas Jefferson said, a long
Speaker 2: train of abuses, and it continues. For your protection, and
Speaker 2: there's more, there's even more. Let's get into some of
Speaker 2: the other items and talk about the worries that people
Speaker 2: have about Sebastian Gorka, and what I brought up seems
Speaker 2: to be something that other people are recognizing as well.
Speaker 2: Sebastian Gorka is a guy who seems quite risky and
Speaker 2: quite dangerous. So let's discuss this man. As I mentioned
Speaker 2: yesterday on the day and I showing on Liberty Conspiracy,
Speaker 2: I didn't even have any contact with him. Years ago.
Speaker 2: I thought, oh, I think he might know some people
Speaker 2: from MRCTV. So I was at Twitter slash x and
Speaker 2: I went over and he had already blocked me. Sebastian Gorka. Well,
Speaker 2: worries about Sebastian Gorka, worries about Mike Huckabee, worries about
Speaker 2: others who are being put into the new Trump administration
Speaker 2: are arising now. Whether or not Trump is doing this
Speaker 2: to try to present a very strong front for negotiating purposes,
Speaker 2: I don't know, but I'll tell you one thing. I
Speaker 2: don't appreciate my money going to Sebastian Gorka. Now, the
Speaker 2: man who already blocked me on Facebook's now is going
Speaker 2: to get part of my paycheck. And he has nonsense
Speaker 2: like we played yesterday to say, let's hear some other
Speaker 2: people who are concerned about this, Judge Andrew Politano and
Speaker 2: Colonel Douglas McGregor, and they put this, Well, here we go.
Speaker 15: In house National Security advisor, this is outlandish, but here
Speaker 15: it is cut number ten.
Speaker 4: I'll give one tip away that the President has mentioned.
Speaker 4: He will say to that murderous for mckagb, colonel, that
Speaker 4: thug who runs the Russian Federation, you will negotiate now
Speaker 4: for the aid that we have given to Ukraine thus
Speaker 4: far will look like peanuts. That's how he will force
Speaker 4: those gentlemen to come to an arrangement that stops the bloodshell.
Speaker 2: Now, before I go into more comments, Before I go
Speaker 2: into more comments from the judge, An Douglas McGregor, I
Speaker 2: want to bring up something I have not brought up
Speaker 2: previously on this commentary, from this comment from mister now
Speaker 2: Security advisor, former advisor to Donald Trump. Mister I know
Speaker 2: it all. Listen to what he had to say here,
Speaker 2: because this, I think is a perfect example of the
Speaker 2: all inclusive, dangerous pronoun we and the idea of aid
Speaker 2: like it's their choice. Let's listen to this again.
Speaker 15: National Security Advisor, this is outlandish, but here it is
Speaker 15: cut number ten.
Speaker 4: I'll give one tip away that the President has mentioned
Speaker 4: he will say to that murderous for mckage b Kernel,
Speaker 4: that thug who runs the Russian Federation, you will negotiate
Speaker 4: now or the aid that we have given.
Speaker 2: Okay, let's stop there. That's a very very key point
Speaker 2: to bring up and to focus on. Sabbat Gorka. Mister Gorka,
Speaker 2: I mean, I'm sorry, Professor Gorka. He stresses that I
Speaker 2: don't know, maybe it's ego, Maybe I don't know. So
Speaker 2: like doctor Jill, he says, the aid we have given
Speaker 2: the inherent fallacy at the heart of that is extremely
Speaker 2: important in my eyes, because it's the all inclusive we.
Speaker 2: It's the pronoun of forced inclusion. It's the royal we.
Speaker 2: You are part of it, whether you like it or not,
Speaker 2: but it's for your own good. It's the I'm embracing you,
Speaker 2: whether you like it or not, and I'm calling it
Speaker 2: we us. What if I don't want to be embraced,
Speaker 2: What if I want to don't want to be assaulted
Speaker 2: by you? No, I'm sorry. It's we, and it's aid.
Speaker 2: We are given as if he's somehow wonderfully beneficent. It's
Speaker 2: he and Donald Trump are going to do this. These
Speaker 2: great chess masters are going to be giving more aid.
Speaker 2: We the aid we have given to Ukraine so far.
Speaker 2: We that itself, the insult of that to all of
Speaker 2: us is so manifest, and it lies at the heart
Speaker 2: of everything politicians do. They always say, America cares, it's
Speaker 2: for your good. We have done this, we have done that. No,
Speaker 2: there is no w, there is no we in the polis.
Speaker 2: It's a group of people telling other people what to do.
Speaker 2: That's what it is. And those other people who are
Speaker 2: forced to do it. You can't say that they gave
Speaker 2: their consent. This again goes back to the point of
Speaker 2: the so called war against all. The state of war
Speaker 2: was something that John Locke said could be avoided by government.
Speaker 2: What is the state? It is constant threat of war
Speaker 2: against you if you don't comply. There is no way
Speaker 2: around it. It's inarguable. And if anybody wants to argue
Speaker 2: about it, just try not complying sometime and see what happens.
Speaker 2: See what people like this man will do under the
Speaker 2: flowery language, the poisonous flowers of aid we have already given,
Speaker 2: and then we will ramp it up. The insult of
Speaker 2: that man to use that on a philosophical level and
Speaker 2: maybe not even realize it is stunning as he wags
Speaker 2: his tail like a tiger out there. Just incredible. And
Speaker 2: to think that all these years after Thanksgiving we can
Speaker 2: see these warmongers doing this sort of thing, All these
Speaker 2: years after the Pilgrims came over, they're doing this sort
Speaker 2: of thing. Let's give one more quick item here for you. Now,
Speaker 2: there supposedly is a ceasefire in Lebanon. This is a
Speaker 2: big move. Israeli Cabinet Lebanon ceasefire announced to begin Tuesday,
Speaker 2: at nine pm Eastern Standard time, Dave DeCamp discussed this
Speaker 2: article by Jason Ditz and I want to show you
Speaker 2: a little bit of what Dave had to say.
Speaker 16: Hey, this is Dave DeCamp from anti war dot com.
Speaker 16: This is anti warnews for Wednesday, November twenty seven, twenty
Speaker 16: twenty four. All right, the first story at the top
Speaker 16: of anti war dot com. Today Lebanon ceasefire goes into effect.
Speaker 16: So this articles from Jason Ditz. So at nine pm
Speaker 16: Eastern time here in the United States, at four am
Speaker 16: be Root time over in Lebanon, in Israel, Lebanon ceasefire
Speaker 16: officially took effect, potentially ending an ongoing in Israeli invasion
Speaker 16: and repeated air strikes which have killed thousands and displaced
Speaker 16: well over a million Lebanese civilians. So this deal was
Speaker 16: broken by the US, and the Israeli security cabinet voted
Speaker 16: earlier today, earlier on Tuesday to support it. This deal
Speaker 16: prescribes a sixty day ceasefire in which HESBLA is to
Speaker 16: move its armed assets north of the Latani River, and
Speaker 16: the Lebanese government is supposed to deploy its army into
Speaker 16: the southern area of the country. As a buffer between
Speaker 16: Israel and Hezbola. Israel, for their part, is supposed to
Speaker 16: do with draw their ground troops from southern Lebanon and
Speaker 16: to stop attacking Lebanese territory, and as far as I
Speaker 16: understand it, they're supposed to do that withdrawal within this
Speaker 16: sixty day timeframe. So we've been talking a lot about
Speaker 16: how Israel was demanding that they have freedom to act
Speaker 16: in Lebanon if they determine that Hesbela has violated the ceasefire.
Speaker 16: But under this deal, according to these reports, there's a
Speaker 16: mechanism that if Israel sees suspicious movements of Hesbela, they're
Speaker 16: supposed to report it to some US led committee. The
Speaker 16: US is like overseeing this ceasefire, even though I mean,
Speaker 16: Israel's strongest and biggest, ally doesn't seem that it's not
Speaker 16: like they're a neutral party. But there's some mechanism where
Speaker 16: Israel supposed to tell the US about it, and then
Speaker 16: the US tells the Lebanese military about it, and then
Speaker 16: if they determine, if the US and Israel determined that
Speaker 16: they didn't do enough about it, then Israel would be
Speaker 16: free to take action.
Speaker 17: Ill that gives Israel it seems like a lot of
Speaker 17: leeway with this ceasefire. So the immediate question now, with
Speaker 17: the ceasefire coming into effect, of course, is this thing
Speaker 17: going to hold. Is Israel actually gonna pull out or
Speaker 17: are they just looking to create some sort of calm
Speaker 17: for a little while. There was a statement issued by
Speaker 17: the Israeli military's Arabic language spokesman. He said that after
Speaker 17: the ceasefire went into effect, he warned Lebanese civilians against
Speaker 17: attempting to return to their homes in the evacuation zones,
Speaker 17: saying the prohibition is still in effect, saying that they
Speaker 17: can't return to their homes yet, so that's not a
Speaker 17: good sign. I still haven't seen any official word from
Speaker 17: Hesbola that they've agreed to the deal, but it does
Speaker 17: seem like, I mean, based on what we've seen today,
Speaker 17: it seems like they must have. But now again, Israel
Speaker 17: really ramped up air strikes. I mean all day throughout Tuesday,
Speaker 17: they were like really bombing Bey Root areas of Central
Speaker 17: Bay Route that they didn't really target too much over
Speaker 17: the past year. And they also, you know, right before
Speaker 17: the seasfire went effect, like a couple hours before, they
Speaker 17: bombed eastern Lebanon, and they carried out multiple attacks on
Speaker 17: North Lebanon on its border crossings into Syria. They've already
Speaker 17: taken out the border crossings in eastern Lebanon, you know,
Speaker 17: but this is in northern Lebanon where they took out
Speaker 17: they were bombing these border crossings and they've all been
Speaker 17: closed now because of that.
Speaker 2: So I want to pause there, everybody, because I've reported
Speaker 2: on this a little while ago. The number of refugees
Speaker 2: who have fled not just Gaza or attempted to flee Gaza,
Speaker 2: but have fled Lebanon and gone into Syria is stunning
Speaker 2: but amazingly the United States government, Yes, they just bomb Syria,
Speaker 2: you got it. The US military announced tuesday that it
Speaker 2: launched a strike in Syria. But you know there's a
Speaker 2: declared war, right, Oh, I'm sorry that hasn't happened since
Speaker 2: World War Two. Yeah, against as so called Iranian aligned target.
Speaker 2: An Iranian aligned target. Now, don't forget how trustworthy so
Speaker 2: many of these people are in government. They don't mention
Speaker 2: what I brought up before, and I showed yesterday in
Speaker 2: the Newsflash that Hamas gets all this criticism from the
Speaker 2: West that they're a terrorist organization. We hear Pamela Bondi
Speaker 2: saying people who are saying that they support Hamas on
Speaker 2: college campuses, the FBI should investigate those people. Right. In fact,
Speaker 2: we can show some of that in just a little bit.
Speaker 2: But it's amazing to think that they seemed to blithely forget,
Speaker 2: conveniently overlook the fact that the Israeli government supported Hamas
Speaker 2: and so did the United States with millions of dollars
Speaker 2: to the leadership living in Cutter. How is that? How
Speaker 2: does that comport with, Oh, you can't support Hamas otherwise
Speaker 2: you're supporting terrorists. I don't get it. But of course
Speaker 2: we've got the United States, after they tried to overthrow
Speaker 2: a SOD numerous times, made up all sorts of stories
Speaker 2: about Asad using chemical weapons against his own people, which
Speaker 2: was obviously bogus, and even Barack Obama had to back
Speaker 2: down from that because students at MIT proved that the
Speaker 2: chemical weapons weren't fired by Assad and weren't the type
Speaker 2: of chemicals that Assad had. This during the Obama administration.
Speaker 2: Now the US is bombing Iranian so called aligned targets
Speaker 2: in Syria. Yeah, it's all about trying to go after Iran,
Speaker 2: as Lindsey Graham said the day of October seventh, now
Speaker 2: got to we gotta take this, take care of this,
Speaker 2: Nikki Haley, take them out, finish it. In other words,
Speaker 2: go after Iran. It's just crazy. They already put a
Speaker 2: rack up against Iran. How about leaving those people alone.
Speaker 2: How about not supporting Israel and its attempts to assassinate Iranians.
Speaker 2: How about Donald Trump not assassinating Iranians. How about not
Speaker 2: making up stories coming from John Brennan about Iranian assassins
Speaker 2: trying to kill Donald Trump, which is ridiculously fabulouistic and stupid.
Speaker 2: The US military announced on Tuesday that it launched a
Speaker 2: strike in Syria against an Iranian aligned target, marking at
Speaker 2: least the third time this month the US has bombed Syria.
Speaker 2: Is that does that at all at all conform to
Speaker 2: any traditional concept of what George Washington said? It's just
Speaker 2: the contemporary cesspool of politics and these characters and these
Speaker 2: people driving these decisions, and the way that they have
Speaker 2: set up the structure of people's careers being in the
Speaker 2: military and being connected to the funding and all these things.
Speaker 2: Next paragraph is a great example. US Central Command sent
Speaker 2: Coom said the strike targeted an Iranian aligned militia weapons
Speaker 2: storage facility. Just set it. Yeah, we just went and
Speaker 2: did it. You can't, You're not supposed to do that.
Speaker 2: It's just it's such an insult to all of you
Speaker 2: out there. It's just amazing how they think they can
Speaker 2: get away with stuff. But good people like Dave DeCamp
Speaker 2: at anti War they're doing really good work. I want
Speaker 2: to thank the anti war folks. I got a call
Speaker 2: from Angela Keaton a few weeks ago talking about how
Speaker 2: they were doing their fundraiser. I've known Angela for a
Speaker 2: long time and she's sort of behind the scenes in
Speaker 2: anti war. And you can follow anti war at anti
Speaker 2: warg Calm on x Dave de Camp is at de
Speaker 2: Camp Dave Dcamp Dave. You can follow Dave de Camp
Speaker 2: and then there's anti war News you can follow at
Speaker 2: anti War News. And I think Angela is sort of
Speaker 2: one of the people behind the anti War news x feed.
Speaker 2: But you know, I think it's worthwhile to keep all
Speaker 2: that in mind as we look at one final bit,
Speaker 2: a couple final bits. I want to compliment Katie Halper
Speaker 2: because she was in a conversation with Piers Morgan, one
Speaker 2: of the guys from the Jewish Defense Forces who actually
Speaker 2: is connected with the war crimes. And he's just unbelievably
Speaker 2: disturbing to see this guy and Alan Dershowitz and I
Speaker 2: played this last night on Liberty Conspiracy because Katie Halper,
Speaker 2: she's very well known for people who watch Aaron Motte.
Speaker 2: She's more on the left wing side. She's well known
Speaker 2: for people who are fans of the Gray Zone. She's
Speaker 2: been a great reporter for a long time for anti
Speaker 2: war stuff. She's Jewish and the stories she's covered have
Speaker 2: been remarkable, and she really really laid into Alan Dershowitz
Speaker 2: with an absolutely fantastic job. And then well, we're going
Speaker 2: to look at a new revelation about Ben Shapiro and
Speaker 2: Candice Owen, which I think you might find interesting, and
Speaker 2: show a final bit about America's involvement in the Middle
Speaker 2: East on video. Yes, they seem to capture their involvement
Speaker 2: a lot. Let's check this out. I think you might
Speaker 2: find this interesting. Katie Helper appearing on the Piers Morgan Show.
Speaker 13: I think that the.
Speaker 18: Claim that any criticism and in all criticism of Israel
Speaker 18: as anti Semitic is a total obvious weaponization of anti Semitism.
Speaker 18: It's pathetic, it's dangerous. It just like me, you always
Speaker 18: interrupt people because you're a bully.
Speaker 13: Please be quiet.
Speaker 18: Is Theodore Maron and anti Semite? The Holocaust survivor who
Speaker 18: was on the committee advising the arrest warrans is anti
Speaker 18: Semite who used to be an ambassador for Israel. The
Speaker 18: other thing is that, of course you don't want to
Speaker 18: hear that Israel commedian war crimes. And you bring up
Speaker 18: the fact that under the ICC arrest Warrens, by that logic,
Speaker 18: the US could be tried for committing war crimes. Well,
Speaker 18: guess what they should be because of course they committed
Speaker 18: war crimes. Of course they committed.
Speaker 2: Wartimes in all right, right there, she nails it. Of
Speaker 2: course they committed war crimes. Interact, they should be absolutely right.
Speaker 2: Will continue and watch Alan Dershowitz and his response again
Speaker 2: an ad hominem attack, not going into any of the
Speaker 2: facts or upholding any of the standards that a person
Speaker 2: who's supposedly involved with the law, I hope would want
Speaker 2: to uphold. But she nails it.
Speaker 3: Of course they.
Speaker 18: Committed wartimes in it yourself, So she is an attack
Speaker 18: against America.
Speaker 2: This is an attack against America. He says, this is
Speaker 2: an attack against him. As I mentioned on my show,
Speaker 2: asked John Kyriaku about that. Why don't you ask John
Speaker 2: Kyriaku his life destroyed because he revealed the war crimes
Speaker 2: that we were forced to pay to have done. Mister Dershowitz,
Speaker 2: this is supposedly one of America's greatest attorneys. And Katie
Speaker 2: Halper wipes the floor with this man and everybody else
Speaker 2: except this guy who also understands. You'll see him nodding
Speaker 2: to what she's saying. He agrees with Katie, So.
Speaker 18: She's an attack against America, as if that's disqualifying. But
Speaker 18: also Alan's numbers the best civilians are totally made up.
Speaker 18: There's no evidence of this. Ninety percent of the victims
Speaker 18: of Israel's crimes against humanity have been women and children
Speaker 18: and Jonathan.
Speaker 2: But children, can you believe it? Again? His response, he says,
Speaker 2: how old are the children? And I'll bring this up
Speaker 2: as I brought it up on liberty conspiras. If you
Speaker 2: look into the history of what Israel has done to
Speaker 2: the Palestinians during this multi decades, multi generational occupation imposed
Speaker 2: by Western elites, and US tax money, British tax money.
Speaker 2: You'll see that every year they have rounded up hundreds
Speaker 2: of people, held them without any due process in any
Speaker 2: way whatsoever, tortured them, which Katie will bring up, raped them,
Speaker 2: which Katie will bring up. As far as the military goes.
Speaker 2: But prior to October seventh, Netnyahu was cited for that
Speaker 2: sort of thing done to in some cases women and
Speaker 2: kids as young as fourteen. And they just in Israel,
Speaker 2: they just passed an allowance to arrest and hold kids
Speaker 2: who were thirteen, which they were already doing essentially, but
Speaker 2: now they've explicitly said they can do it. I mean
Speaker 2: to support forcing my neighbor to pay for any of
Speaker 2: this stuff is already a baseline no no, But when
Speaker 2: you look, I mean, whatever side one wants to pick,
Speaker 2: but when you look at the sheer preponderance of the evidence,
Speaker 2: there is no possible way that anyone with any sense
Speaker 2: of moral dignity can say, I want to force my
Speaker 2: neighbor to pay for Israel. The state of Israel, as
Speaker 2: David Knight has said, the state, the political Israel is
Speaker 2: different than Israel in the Bible, than the biblical Israel.
Speaker 2: The state is not people. The state is an entity
Speaker 2: created to propel certain individuals and their ideas. It's not
Speaker 2: the individuals themselves who are forced to be part of it. Now,
Speaker 2: if someone is living in Israel, in that occupied area
Speaker 2: and they've moved there willingly, there's a problem. If you're
Speaker 2: born there, what do you do after all these years? Ethically,
Speaker 2: I would get out. I'd say I'm leaving this place.
Speaker 2: I was born into an occupied area where I'm part
Speaker 2: of the occupation. Now I've been put into it. But
Speaker 2: then that gets us thinking about the United States, American Indians.
Speaker 2: All that stuff very complicated.
Speaker 18: Here's more Yet, I would be upset if I were you,
Speaker 18: because you've been implicated on war crimes yourself. You lied
Speaker 18: about Al Shifa hospital. You claimed it with a hummat stronghold.
Speaker 2: You were debunked. Right now, she's talking to this man.
Speaker 2: I want to go back because they had a little
Speaker 2: cut there. She's talking to that man from the IDEF.
Speaker 2: He's a spokesman for the idea and he is one
Speaker 2: of the most unctuous characters I've seen for a long time.
Speaker 18: You claimed it with a hummatz wronghold. You were debunked
Speaker 18: by the babies.
Speaker 2: So she's talking about the Al Shifa hospital right.
Speaker 18: The Hummat's wronghold. You were debunked by the BBC, Fox
Speaker 18: News and the Washington Post.
Speaker 2: I know you have.
Speaker 18: So you've been implicated into war crimes. One is you
Speaker 18: defended you of the long servation order on October ninth,
Speaker 18: when you went on to Twitter Live and you defended
Speaker 18: it and you called them beasts, you called Falcian beasts.
Speaker 18: The other thing is you lied about Alshifa Hospital and
Speaker 18: what happened. Then, first of all, you lied, but second
Speaker 18: of all, I'm going to be careable and say you
Speaker 18: didn't lie. Let's say everything you found, even though we
Speaker 18: know you edited the video, and we know this because
Speaker 18: the BBC, Fox News and Washington Posts all said that.
Speaker 18: But even if the things that you had found had
Speaker 18: been there, it would have been a war crime. Why
Speaker 18: because in order to justify the exception to violating a hospital,
Speaker 18: you have to prove that it's an active terrorst center,
Speaker 18: which you didn't prove, even and what the fake evidence
Speaker 18: you provide. The other thing is you have to use proportionality,
Speaker 18: no matter what or else, it's a war crime. You
Speaker 18: absolutely did not use proportionality when you killed hundreds of
Speaker 18: thousands of people. You executed them, you turned.
Speaker 3: Off executed, Okay.
Speaker 2: So I'll close that there because of course there's a
Speaker 2: lot of bickering back and forth. And the one area
Speaker 2: where I would ask her for amplification, if I could
Speaker 2: get it from Katie, would be the hundreds of thousands. Uh,
Speaker 2: there are estimates of the number of people who have
Speaker 2: been named and killed is much lower than the number
Speaker 2: that they estimate overall has been killed inside Gaza. And
Speaker 2: then we can add Lebanon and Beirut to that. Now
Speaker 2: in addition to people being killed in Syria by both
Speaker 2: the United States and Israel using the United States weapons
Speaker 2: most likely. But there are a couple points that I
Speaker 2: want to bring up there. If we go back in history,
Speaker 2: it's probably hundreds of thousands if we go back beyond
Speaker 2: October seventh, but the estimate is about one hundred and
Speaker 2: fifteen thousand people killed that including named and unnamed. Because
Speaker 2: there's so many people beneath the rubble. They haven't been identified.
Speaker 2: They're just body parts. They don't even know who they are.
Speaker 2: It is just unbelievable what's going on. So Katie Helper,
Speaker 2: just a great, great job from Katie Helper. Excellent stuff,
Speaker 2: and I admire the fact that she calls these people
Speaker 2: out and she has such alacrity and facility with the
Speaker 2: facts to be able to remember all that stuff and
Speaker 2: hit that IDF guy to say, you know, you went
Speaker 2: into Al Shifa hospital and here is the actual standard,
Speaker 2: and you didn't even reach that standard. But if we
Speaker 2: look at war crimes, we have to talk about proportionality.
Speaker 2: Even that you didn't use proportionality, you engage in war crimes.
Speaker 2: No way out for those people, absolutely no way out.
Speaker 2: The only way out, of course, is that the US
Speaker 2: government will just keep giving the weapons, which is exactly
Speaker 2: what Benjamin Netnah who wants. That's I think why he's
Speaker 2: gonna have this so called ceasefire with Lebanon so they
Speaker 2: can concentrate until maybe sometime in the first week of
Speaker 2: January and clearing out as many of the people that
Speaker 2: they can in Gaza. It's just incredible to think. And
Speaker 2: then they've got the effrontery to say, well, why don't
Speaker 2: these other countries take the refugees? Are you from that
Speaker 2: other country? Seriously you're gonna say that. Finally, let's take
Speaker 2: a quick look at something that's been revealed that I
Speaker 2: think is pretty darn valuable of two things. Actually, First,
Speaker 2: let's take a look at this one. This from Anya Powerple.
Speaker 2: She is Max Bloomenthal's wife. He from the Gray Zone.
Speaker 2: She has a lot of great journalism behind her in
Speaker 2: a book about the United States involvement in Venezuela. This
Speaker 2: is a quote that she's pulled from Rabbi Shmooley, the
Speaker 2: also unctuous character in the United States, pushing for the
Speaker 2: United States to hand more weapons to Israel. She says,
Speaker 2: this is a quote from the rabbi. We forced Ben
Speaker 2: to fire her talking about Candice Owens, got her banned
Speaker 2: and demonetized from YouTube, banned from Australia. That is what
Speaker 2: Rabbi Schmolli is claiming. He's patting himself on the back.
Speaker 2: And finally, I'd like to give you this. This is
Speaker 2: an image indicting himself on your dime. This is a
Speaker 2: United States soldier from the seveny twentieth Battalion firing at
Speaker 2: Palestinian homes in Gaza. Check this out. Calisi has this
Speaker 2: and he's celebrating who's victory. This is not a good
Speaker 2: harbinger for the future.
Speaker 12: This is on the occasion of Donald Trump's presidency.
Speaker 5: God Bless America, God Bless Israel.
Speaker 2: I don't even know what to say. It's just it's
Speaker 2: so perverse, it's so upside down. I can't even it.
Speaker 2: Just words fail me. I think, just unbelievable. What are
Speaker 2: you doing, dude? What are you doing? How do you
Speaker 2: come up with a rationale for that? I just don't
Speaker 2: get it. And as I said, in the meantime, you've
Speaker 2: got good people like him trying to do good work.
Speaker 2: You got good people like Scott Horton talking about what's
Speaker 2: going on in Ukraine. You know, I don't know, it's
Speaker 2: just weird, peace loving people versus I don't know, crazy stuff,
Speaker 2: crazy stuff. But let's take a break, here's some good music,
Speaker 2: and come back and think about Thanksgiving, and think about
Speaker 2: the blessings that are out there and some of the
Speaker 2: principles that we already saw expressed through some of the
Speaker 2: folks who came over on the Mayflower and celebrated that
Speaker 2: first Thanksgiving in the eyes of God. And in fact,
Speaker 2: let's get another wonderful musical piece from the David Night
Speaker 2: Show and David Knight's great talent as he reworked the
Speaker 2: Patriot and what a fantastic theme from John Williams, and
Speaker 2: of course the interpretation from David Knight on The David Knight.
Speaker 19: Show Liberty, It's Your Move and now the David Night Show.
Speaker 2: Fantastic stuff. Again. I haven't seen that Patriot movie. I
Speaker 2: wanted to see it. I like Mel Gibson's work. I
Speaker 2: saw Apocalypto on a plane and I wasn't even I
Speaker 2: didn't even put it on myself. It was in the
Speaker 2: aisle across from me. I kept my eyes kept getting
Speaker 2: drawn to it, and since it's in a different language
Speaker 2: and had subtitles, I could just keep glancing over at it. Wow.
Speaker 2: And of course, you know, so many of his other
Speaker 2: movies are so so wonderful, so terrific stuff. And I
Speaker 2: want to thank a contributor for the David Knight program
Speaker 2: we already had. Carlos Rex and Mark Young contributed to
Speaker 2: the program over on Rockfinn. So thank you Mark. And
Speaker 2: look at some of the comments from people on Rock Finn.
Speaker 2: And want to welcome everybody who's watching. I'm Gardner Goldsmith
Speaker 2: filling in for David as he takes some time off
Speaker 2: to be with the family for Thanksgiving. And I saw
Speaker 2: Michael Palm Roy said, good morning, Guard, and Dusty Milton said,
Speaker 2: good morning. Steve Swan horses in there, coming in from Maine.
Speaker 2: Nancy Chambers says Happy Thanksgiving Guard and all. Jason Barker
Speaker 2: course was in there earlier. Doug a lug inside, Rockvin
Speaker 2: and IRS machine gun Good morning, thank you Irs machine
Speaker 2: gun boy. What a great group of people. Wes Robertson.
Speaker 2: Yona Yonah is there saying Happy Thanksgiving. Octo Spook coming
Speaker 2: in and I see IQ micro Dodd. Thank you very
Speaker 2: much for being there, everybody, and over at Rumble. Let's
Speaker 2: see what's going on over at Rumble and welcome you
Speaker 2: over there as well. Please share the videos, like and
Speaker 2: subscribe and all that stuff. Give it the thumbs up
Speaker 2: as often as you can. I want to thank twelfth
Speaker 2: of June seventeen seventy six. And oh hey, you know what,
Speaker 2: you're in a very good theme. You're in a very
Speaker 2: good theme. U yes, quoting the Bible, for I have
Speaker 2: come to turn a man against his father, a daughter
Speaker 2: against her mother, a daughter in law against her mother
Speaker 2: in law. A man's enemies will be the members of
Speaker 2: his own household. Jesus yep. And we've got a quote
Speaker 2: that I'm going to bring up in fact as we
Speaker 2: introduce our next guest. Since it's Thanksgiving, I want to
Speaker 2: do something right now. Bring in our guest, a man
Speaker 2: who was very courageous and really did a great job
Speaker 2: for many people in the military to try to make
Speaker 2: sure that they could find a way out of the job.
Speaker 2: He found a religious exemption, wrote about it, and after that,
Speaker 2: of course, has been part of the David Knight Audience.
Speaker 2: The family started Nights of the Storm with Angry Tiger
Speaker 2: has his own show called The Foxhoul. He is none
Speaker 2: other than Jason Barker. Hi Jason, and Happy Thanksgiving early buddy.
Speaker 2: How are you.
Speaker 20: I'm good at Thanksgiving. You're so kind on the intro guard.
Speaker 2: Hey, no problem, man, no problem. You know I always
Speaker 2: love watching your show. It's just great. And you know,
Speaker 2: communicating with you by phone and text it's always heartwarming.
Speaker 2: So I want to send the best to you and
Speaker 2: your family, your grandkids. Amazingly, you've got grandkids. It's just crazy.
Speaker 2: You know, you look like you're in your twenties. It's
Speaker 2: just bizarre. And again and welcome to the David Night Show.
Speaker 2: We decided that today we talk a little bit about
Speaker 2: thanksgiving and family and faith and things like that. Do
Speaker 2: you mind if I put up a Bible quote. You
Speaker 2: often do this on your program, and I thought.
Speaker 20: I got one here as well that i'll quote here.
Speaker 20: All right, I'll put this up here. This is from
Speaker 20: Blue Letter Bible, and this is actually from today.
Speaker 2: They have this. We're going to add this to the
Speaker 2: stage here and says this, thank you guys. It says
Speaker 2: these things I have spoken unto you that in me
Speaker 2: ye might have peace in the world. You shall have tribulation,
Speaker 2: but be of good cheer. I have overcome the world.
Speaker 2: That from John and Jason. What do you have to offer?
Speaker 20: Well? I wanted to talk about Thanksgiving and how it
Speaker 20: pertains to forgiving. That's going to be a new tradition
Speaker 20: for me. Every Thanksgiving, I want to reflect on the
Speaker 20: past year and when people have done me wrong or whatever,
Speaker 20: find a way to forgive them in my heart. I'm
Speaker 20: not saying not to hold people accountable. I'm not saying
Speaker 20: that at all. But I've had some things happen this
Speaker 20: past year where I've really been wronged, and I've been
Speaker 20: holding that in my heart. It's hard to be thankful
Speaker 20: when you have anger and you know, as a Christian,
Speaker 20: the greatest thing I have to be thankful for is
Speaker 20: for the sacrifice that Christ made, and he did that
Speaker 20: to forgive me. So I think thanksgiving and forgiving go
Speaker 20: hand in hand. And if I could quote Matthew six
Speaker 20: verses fourteen and fifteen, for if you forgive men their trespasses,
Speaker 20: your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you
Speaker 20: forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive
Speaker 20: your trespasses. So I think it's critical that we have
Speaker 20: that spirit of forgiveness in us again. You got to
Speaker 20: hold people accountable. That's what you know with Trump. I'm
Speaker 20: not going to hold any hatred to Trump for what
Speaker 20: I went through in the military, because that was directly
Speaker 20: due to him. I'm not going to hold hatred for
Speaker 20: the military. And when I let that go, I could
Speaker 20: then be thankful for what the military has given to
Speaker 20: me and still continue, you know, have a retirement and
Speaker 20: all that stuff. So, uh, you can't really see those
Speaker 20: things to be thankful for if you're holding hatred. Is
Speaker 20: one I'm trying to get at.
Speaker 2: You know, that's a great point. That's a great point,
Speaker 2: you know, I think we can call people to task,
Speaker 2: feel anger and frustration, but at the same time hope
Speaker 2: that they will find redemption and then of course try
Speaker 2: to find some way to find a way to say,
Speaker 2: I'm going to use this to inform myself and not
Speaker 2: hold on to hatred.
Speaker 20: Right, very good? Yeah, And I really like you know Tiger,
Speaker 20: we had you had Tiger on yesterday. He did a
Speaker 20: lot of profound things, and I really love his philosophy
Speaker 20: of time being your most valuable come. And you know,
Speaker 20: if we you know, your time keeps on slipping into
Speaker 20: the future, and we don't want to let the days
Speaker 20: go by, you know, you know those music references, right, I.
Speaker 2: Want to but it's so true.
Speaker 20: Yeah, if if we're holding h if we're letting people
Speaker 20: live rent free in our hearts, on our heads, we're
Speaker 20: we're wasting time, you know. And uh, you know you
Speaker 20: don't want to hoard your time either, you know, like
Speaker 20: it's a commodity, but you don't hold it because it
Speaker 20: is slipping by. Right, So rather than use the time
Speaker 20: to have hatred and bitterness, go do something. And I
Speaker 20: got a quick story I'd like to share with you
Speaker 20: how your life can be more fulfilled by you know, uh,
Speaker 20: you know, doing something kind. So I was going up.
Speaker 20: I took little JJ up to the mailbox yesterday. He
Speaker 20: likes to ride in the wagon behind the mower, and
Speaker 20: we get about a quarter mile stretch of gravel road
Speaker 20: where all the mailboxes are. So as I'm coming back, uh,
Speaker 20: somebody had dropped off three little puppies, just abandoned them. Oh,
Speaker 20: and this was a pretty busy time. People were coming
Speaker 20: home from work and going out to dinner and stuff,
Speaker 20: so a lot of traffic right there, and people were
Speaker 20: slowing down. It was all bottlenecked around this really dangerous
Speaker 20: kind of blind curve, so I couldn't really stop and
Speaker 20: get them at that time. And it just kind of
Speaker 20: dawned on me that, you know, people are busy with
Speaker 20: their time and they're not taking the time to do
Speaker 20: something kind. They just kind of went around the dogs
Speaker 20: and got out of there. Don't worry about it whatever.
Speaker 20: So I get the mower back to the house, I
Speaker 20: put JJ inside, I come out, and I'm walking down
Speaker 20: the road to try and get these dogs to follow
Speaker 20: me well alone. And behold, my neighbor two houses down
Speaker 20: for me had picked them up and brought them to
Speaker 20: her house. As I was walking by, she's pulling them
Speaker 20: out of the truck and I said, oh, you found them.
Speaker 20: So she's like, yeah, I'm gonna see if I can
Speaker 20: find out who owns them or whatever. She only had two,
Speaker 20: and I said, you know there was three, right, So
Speaker 20: she said no, So she comes over to my house.
Speaker 20: I put them in my workshop where it's heated in there. Yeah,
Speaker 20: let them, you know, get him some water and stuff.
Speaker 20: And she went back and got the third one, brought
Speaker 20: him back and then but the long story short, I
Speaker 20: made a better relationship with my neighbor's daughter. I know
Speaker 20: her now. Yeah, we worked together. We brought the puppies in.
Speaker 20: My grandson got to play with the puppies. So there's
Speaker 20: so many great rewards and actually spending your time doing
Speaker 20: something for someone else.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And you know, Jason, it's interesting you should bring
Speaker 2: that up because you know, my sister is currently visiting
Speaker 2: with our neighbor. You might have heard me mention this
Speaker 2: about a year ago. Around this time, I went down
Speaker 2: and visited with my neighbors, the Driscolls, And you know,
Speaker 2: they were the parents of kids who were about my
Speaker 2: brother and sister's age. But I was seven years my
Speaker 2: brother's junior. Five years my sister's junior, and they would
Speaker 2: let me tag along and they had some other There
Speaker 2: was another family who had kids that were sort of
Speaker 2: their age plus my age. So we would all be
Speaker 2: in this big group and they would let me, you know,
Speaker 2: do things with them sometimes, you know, go sledding and
Speaker 2: so on. And we would be around the house playing
Speaker 2: whiffle ball or softball or whatever, flashlight tag, you know,
Speaker 2: that sort of thing, and Missus Driscoll was always there.
Speaker 2: We'd go into the house, she'd be giving us uh uh,
Speaker 2: spaghettios or apple pie or whatever it was, you know.
Speaker 2: And so we had gotten a call from her daughter
Speaker 2: because uh well actually we went down a little bit
Speaker 2: before that just to say hello. I said hello to
Speaker 2: mister Missus Driscoll, just to say hi, and he was
Speaker 2: going to go in for heart surgery and I didn't
Speaker 2: know that. I just went to say hello, and he
Speaker 2: had he was a great artist, mister Driscoll, and he
Speaker 2: had done little cartoons of us as kids playing. And
Speaker 2: we had a dog named Snowball who was just a
Speaker 2: wonderful dog. She stayed by my side after I broke
Speaker 2: my arms sledding across the woods over streams over barberia
Speaker 2: fences and snowball fences. I had to go back through
Speaker 2: the woods. My dog stayed by my side the whole time.
Speaker 2: I thought I was going to get sick to my stomach,
Speaker 2: had to sit down on a stone wall. She was
Speaker 2: there the whole time. Snowball, Snowball is in some of
Speaker 2: those little sketches running with us, and it was amazing.
Speaker 2: Mister Driscoll went in for the heart surgery, and unfortunately
Speaker 2: a number of probably about a month and a half later,
Speaker 2: he passed away. And so Missus Driscoll is by herself.
Speaker 2: They were in their nineties. They've been married for decades
Speaker 2: and decades and decades and decades, you know. And so
Speaker 2: I continued the contact with Missus Driscoll, and my sister's
Speaker 2: down there right now bringing her some pumpkin bread. And
Speaker 2: you know, he was the guy. We went to his funeral,
Speaker 2: or to his memorial service at a local church, and
Speaker 2: they asked if anyone else wanted to get up and speak.
Speaker 2: And I had been in the in the audience, watching,
Speaker 2: and I thought about how mister Driscoll, when he knew
Speaker 2: that there was a new street being put in behind
Speaker 2: their old farmhouse and so on and so forth. He
Speaker 2: knew that he could create a little path, and there
Speaker 2: were already some paths in the woods, some cow paths,
Speaker 2: old stone walls and things like that. He used his
Speaker 2: lawnmower to create a path between our house and their
Speaker 2: house because he knew there were going to be kids
Speaker 2: and we could start to play. So I said, I
Speaker 2: got up and I spoke and I said, you know,
Speaker 2: mister Driscoll was kind enough to use his lawnmower to
Speaker 2: create a path on which we could walk. And I said,
Speaker 2: but mister Driscoll already knew that there was a path
Speaker 2: that Christ gave to us, and so he had already
Speaker 2: seen a path that had been laid out for him.
Speaker 2: And I don't know why the thought came to my mind,
Speaker 2: but what you're talking about of forgiveness, that's a major
Speaker 2: part of walking on that path, to be a to
Speaker 2: go along that route, to say God laid this path
Speaker 2: of peace out there for me, and if I keep
Speaker 2: walking this path, everything is going to be okay, because
Speaker 2: it's not about the material world. It's about my salvation,
Speaker 2: my soul and trying to help others save their souls.
Speaker 2: So I think that's very interesting that you should bring
Speaker 2: up that quote and you should look at it that way.
Speaker 2: It's also interesting, Jason, because you know, you were in
Speaker 2: the midst of a pretty heavy battle in the military
Speaker 2: to try to come up with a religious exemption against
Speaker 2: the JAB, and you could hold resentment for a lot
Speaker 2: of those folks, but you find the positives and being
Speaker 2: with your family, you're out of the military now and
Speaker 2: all these people that we've met because we've been associated
Speaker 2: with David Knight here, It's amazing, isn't it.
Speaker 20: Well, you know, yeah, it was rough, and I got
Speaker 20: to understand and empathize a lot of those folks did
Speaker 20: not want to get the JAB, and I guess they
Speaker 20: feel I gained the system, so they had resentment towards me,
Speaker 20: you know, so I feel empathy and that's why they
Speaker 20: treated me badly. You know, not everybody treated me badly.
Speaker 20: Some people was like, man, I wish I would have
Speaker 20: stuck it out, you know, especially when the mandate went
Speaker 20: away finally and they realized that they didn't have to
Speaker 20: get the jabs, and they all said that they don't work.
Speaker 20: We know it doesn't work, we know the mask doesn't work.
Speaker 20: But they went along to get along. So some people
Speaker 20: really held resentment towards me because I wasn't doing what
Speaker 20: they were forced to do. And you know, I empathize
Speaker 20: with them. Now that I can forgive them, I can
Speaker 20: actually pray for them that you know, you know, they
Speaker 20: don't get sick, and you know, I don't want any
Speaker 20: hatred towards them whatsoever. And think about this when it
Speaker 20: comes to forgiveness. Think about how many families during this
Speaker 20: time of year won't get together because there's some kind
Speaker 20: of an issue between them.
Speaker 2: Oh, would be terrible.
Speaker 20: Yeah, what happens all the time. You know, they have
Speaker 20: political differences, or maybe they feel differently about COVID. You know,
Speaker 20: COVID really exacerbated the problem by making us all shut in.
Speaker 20: So it's easier to say, I'm not going over to
Speaker 20: Aunt Mary's this year for Thanksgiving dinner. And besides she's
Speaker 20: a Trump supporter or you know that kind of stuff.
Speaker 20: Let's just put that stuff aside. Forgive them. Understand people,
Speaker 20: I don't know, you just don't let them live rent
Speaker 20: free in your heart because you're wasting your time and
Speaker 20: your time, as Tiger says, it's your most valuable asset, you.
Speaker 2: Know, Yeah, yeah, and I it's I remember the first
Speaker 2: time I heard Tiger say that. I'm like, boy, that
Speaker 2: is exactly right. And sometimes I've sort of traveled along
Speaker 2: those lines where I think about that and how important
Speaker 2: it is, and you think about, you know, your relationships
Speaker 2: with people, and if you can sort of step up
Speaker 2: and approach somebody and you don't even have to explicitly
Speaker 2: say I'm sorry for quite a while, you can just
Speaker 2: start talking to them and then you know, get comfortable
Speaker 2: with it and say hey, you know, months later you
Speaker 2: can even say hey, you know for a long time,
Speaker 2: want to mention to you, I'm real sorry about that
Speaker 2: or whatever. Sometimes that's a more comfortable way to do it.
Speaker 2: Let's let's take a look at some of the comments
Speaker 2: from people. Jason inside Rumble Rock fin on X. I
Speaker 2: see that we have inside rumble Land, the fruit striped
Speaker 2: gum colors of Rumble watching the David Knight Show, and
Speaker 2: people are talking about Cuthulhu. Uh, but we have.
Speaker 20: Bill Yes, Matthew Ron ronson. That's why I keep looking up.
Speaker 20: I gotta screen up here with my yes. Yes, he says,
Speaker 20: how do you forgive when they do not repent, slash acknowledge,
Speaker 20: they were wrong. Well, I think that you forgive them anyway.
Speaker 20: Like I said, you hold people accountable, but that's on
Speaker 20: them that they're going to hold that hatred in their
Speaker 20: heart if they want. You don't have to.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, so yeah, that's that's something to work out.
Speaker 2: It's a it's an interesting balance to to mention that
Speaker 2: you you've got to be held accountable for my purposes
Speaker 2: and for what crisis, I I forgive you, but in
Speaker 2: order for your soul you have to ask forgiveness of God.
Speaker 2: And I hope that you will acknowledge your your mistakes
Speaker 2: and ask forgiveness from other people at least, you know,
Speaker 2: because as far as your your integrity goes your reputation
Speaker 2: amongst other people, that's very very important. And it also
Speaker 2: allows you to feel like you've done the right thing
Speaker 2: for those other people as well. That's part of it
Speaker 2: in the eyes of others. And I think that was
Speaker 2: a great question from Matthew, and I'll you knowe.
Speaker 20: Here are related. This is actually a good follow up.
Speaker 20: Britt twenty seven, thirty six seventy four says, in order
Speaker 20: to forgive, the offending behavior must stop first. I would
Speaker 20: agree with that. I really had a hard time while
Speaker 20: I was in the military, but now that I don't
Speaker 20: have to be in that situation anymore, I had to
Speaker 20: let it go. But yeah, it could be very difficult.
Speaker 20: It's kind of like war. You know, how do you
Speaker 20: stop shooting at the enemy until they stop charging you?
Speaker 20: You know, but once the war is over, it needs
Speaker 20: to be over.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 20: So yeah, that is a good point, very good point.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's it's you know, sort of like the story
Speaker 2: from World War One with the soldiers taking a break
Speaker 2: for Christmas, exchanging gifts and so and then going back
Speaker 2: to fight each other. Just so tragic and difficult to
Speaker 2: even assess. You know. I noticed Bulldog, I was reading
Speaker 2: it wrong. Bulldog b U l l l d A
Speaker 2: A gg so b double l D double A double
Speaker 2: G says the Bible is God's inspired word. Yeah, so right,
Speaker 2: And and also some questions and points about Gorka that
Speaker 2: maybe I can check out. It might have scrolled past
Speaker 2: that a little bit, but I also want to check
Speaker 2: out rock Finn and see what folks are saying on
Speaker 2: Rock Finn as well as I see Karen Carpenter, Thank you.
Speaker 2: Karen contributed to The David Night Show at ten dollars
Speaker 2: and I think that, you know, it's interesting, Jason, because
Speaker 2: as the holidays come around, people talk about celebrating Christmas.
Speaker 2: David Knight brought this up, and you know, Christmas is
Speaker 2: even really on Christmas Day. It's based on a pagan holiday.
Speaker 2: You know, it has these pagan trappings and so on.
Speaker 2: And I've spoken with Tiger about this. As the descendant
Speaker 2: of Pagans from the Irish and maybe Germanic English, you know,
Speaker 2: I have to recognize that there are certain attributes to
Speaker 2: the ways that the Pagans operated in some cases in
Speaker 2: ancient Irish culture, the Brehon law in the tribal systems
Speaker 2: and the families, and the recognitions that are not alien
Speaker 2: to peaceful coexistence, and that I admire. The fact that
Speaker 2: they were not Christians is something that I understand, and
Speaker 2: the fact that I can be a Christian and still
Speaker 2: recognize those traditions. I still celebrate Christmas at Christmas time,
Speaker 2: we still have a Christmas tree. I understand that, and
Speaker 2: hopefully I'm not doing something that is insulting God and
Speaker 2: insulting Christ by incorporation of that pagan style in the
Speaker 2: celebration of Christ's birth. What do you think about that?
Speaker 20: I think Christ's birth should be celebrated every single day,
Speaker 20: you know, so it doesn't really matter to me what
Speaker 20: day we set aside to say we're going to take
Speaker 20: some time as a family and do this together. I
Speaker 20: don't know, kind of like you know, the whole Halloween
Speaker 20: thing in the Christmas tree, you know, that's more for
Speaker 20: the kids. I don't think it's that big of a
Speaker 20: deal as long as you're teach them what it's really about.
Speaker 20: And that's how my grandma was. My grandma taught me,
Speaker 20: you know, God rest her soul. She told me when
Speaker 20: I was very young that Christmas wasn't on Christmas days.
Speaker 20: And she had a very good logic behind it. She says, okay,
Speaker 20: so you got these baby animals in a manger, what
Speaker 20: time of what season are they born? So that would
Speaker 20: indicate maybe springtime or something, or you know, she she
Speaker 20: had a specific day in mind. And I've seen some
Speaker 20: scientific evidence on it as well. When you talk about
Speaker 20: the wise men following the star, they actually now with
Speaker 20: three D modeling and you know the astrology thing, they
Speaker 20: can roll back time and they figured out I can't
Speaker 20: remember it was, it was a planet, I believe, is
Speaker 20: what they say. The star was that it rose and
Speaker 20: went down because of the movement of the planets, and
Speaker 20: they could they kind of pinpointed the exact day, or
Speaker 20: within a day or two of when they believe Christ
Speaker 20: was born. But to me, that doesn't really matter. It's
Speaker 20: it's kind of like you should be you should be
Speaker 20: thankful every single day for Christ's sacrifice. You should reflect
Speaker 20: on it every single day. And if it's just one day,
Speaker 20: it's kind of like President's Day, just pick a day, right, Yeah,
Speaker 20: And I think that it's it is nice that it's
Speaker 20: still a tradition in our country, even though a lot
Speaker 20: of people don't really understand what it's about. I think
Speaker 20: it's nice as a tradition that the entire nation kind
Speaker 20: of celebrates together.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 2: You you bring it up to me and you remind
Speaker 2: me that. Over the years, I also have tempered my
Speaker 2: position on celebrating Christmas with all of those trappings and
Speaker 2: so on, although I do, you know, I like the
Speaker 2: Christmas tree and things and the glitter and so on.
Speaker 2: That's nice, But I sort of take the same attitude
Speaker 2: when I look at the material world around me on
Speaker 2: a very low key basis. Every day. I always remind
Speaker 2: myself that that is the work of God. And so
Speaker 2: every day it doesn't matter because Christ is still here
Speaker 2: with us. So he always was and always will be.
Speaker 2: He's you know, the idea that God is here with
Speaker 2: us right now as we speak, watching us and created
Speaker 2: us is incredibly important to remember. And yet I can
Speaker 2: keep it sort of at a low key level each day,
Speaker 2: And in a way it is a way to celebrate
Speaker 2: Christmas Day because every day Christ is there. He's eternal.
Speaker 2: So when we talk about the birth of Christ on earth,
Speaker 2: we have to remember that God is eternal in the
Speaker 2: first place. So why not eternally all the time? Remember
Speaker 2: that and celebrate the existence of God every day. That's
Speaker 2: a very good point, Jason, That's an excellent point. What
Speaker 2: do you like to do? Oh? Sorry, go ahead.
Speaker 20: Oh I was gonna say about the tree And you know,
Speaker 20: some of the traditions we do that may have history
Speaker 20: people aren't aware of. Okay, I know people don't do
Speaker 20: it anymore. But when I was a kid, we would
Speaker 20: take the car out somewhere, walk off into the woods
Speaker 20: and go cut a tree down, and that was a
Speaker 20: family activity. We would come home, put the tree up,
Speaker 20: we would take and the kids and everybody would decorate
Speaker 20: the tree. We put the lights on it, and then
Speaker 20: we would take the popcorn and needle and thread and
Speaker 20: make the whatever, I don't know what you call it, whatever,
Speaker 20: the thing that goes around.
Speaker 2: The tree, usually garland garland, garland tinsil.
Speaker 20: Yeah, we didn't have the tinsil stuff. We would get
Speaker 20: popcorn and thread it on and put it around the tree,
Speaker 20: and we would hang candy canes on the tree. It
Speaker 20: was a fun family activity, even putting the lights up.
Speaker 20: The years that we did lights up on the front
Speaker 20: of the house or whatever, we did that together. So
Speaker 20: I think there's a lot to be said about you know,
Speaker 20: don't get wrapped up in as Tiger would say, the
Speaker 20: minutia of things where the history came from, get wrapped
Speaker 20: up in the spending time together. I know people don't
Speaker 20: do that anymore, but that whole season was about togetherness
Speaker 20: and family. And you know, again, we celebrate christ every
Speaker 20: single day, but that's there's a special time set aside
Speaker 20: where we do it as a nation and then we
Speaker 20: take some time off work and spend time with the
Speaker 20: family doing those activities. We have one of these trees
Speaker 20: now that you just snap it together and it's got
Speaker 20: the lights built in. I don't know, there's not really
Speaker 20: a lot of fun in that, you know. So maybe
Speaker 20: when JJ gets older, we'll go traditional and I'll take
Speaker 20: him out in the woods and cut down a tree
Speaker 20: bring it home.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, that's something. And you know, if you think
Speaker 2: about the little parts of that, you know, oftentimes for
Speaker 2: Thanksgiving our family will go out for a walk or
Speaker 2: something like that, which is always fun to do. Brisk
Speaker 2: it's cool. It's fun to go out for a hike
Speaker 2: with a purpose with somebody else, especially a youngster, to
Speaker 2: do a certain thing. So it combines going for a
Speaker 2: walk out of nature and a project you're working on
Speaker 2: together and bringing something back as a piece of an
Speaker 2: achievement of something for the family to do. What I'm
Speaker 2: a beautiful beautiful memories Jason, you know, just fantastic. And
Speaker 2: we used to do used to do the same thing.
Speaker 2: Some days the light would be failing. You just get
Speaker 2: there and you got to cut your tree down and
Speaker 2: you can't really see that well and you just get
Speaker 2: it as twilight is coming in. You tie it to
Speaker 2: the roof of the car and you're ready to go,
Speaker 2: or you put it in the trunk you have to
Speaker 2: put the seat down and strap it all together. You know,
Speaker 2: you can smell the exhaust coming through the back of
Speaker 2: the car, that sort of thing. Everything's fine, you know.
Speaker 2: We had an old Volvo that actually had a hole
Speaker 2: in the in the floor underneath the underneath the gas
Speaker 2: pedal or the clutch that my mom had. We had
Speaker 2: to keep trying to close it up so the exhaust
Speaker 2: wouldn't come through from the old Volvo, you know, or
Speaker 2: water wouldn't splash up, you know. But it was fun.
Speaker 2: It was so much fun. And for Thanksgiving? What are
Speaker 2: you planning for Thanksgiving?
Speaker 20: Jason? We're just gonna have dinner here, and I think
Speaker 20: the neighbor invited us over. We might spend a little
Speaker 20: bit of time over there. And my aunt lives in Springfield.
Speaker 20: I don't know if they're planning to do something. I
Speaker 20: get a hold of her, but we've spent a couple
Speaker 20: of Thanksgivings there, but I hadn't got word. Usually the
Speaker 20: entire family tries to meet somewhere, either my mom's house
Speaker 20: or my aunt's house. But I haven't heard anything. Again,
Speaker 20: the COVID kind of like shut everything down. Everyone's a
Speaker 20: shut in now, and I think that's by design to
Speaker 20: break our traditions and make us isolated. I just it
Speaker 20: hasn't been the same. We really need to get into
Speaker 20: that spirit of forgiveness and togetherness and and start, you know,
Speaker 20: and they're gonna they're gonna pull it again. That I
Speaker 20: mean if you take a look at Trump's I don't
Speaker 20: want to get too political, but a lot of Trump's picks,
Speaker 20: right his cabinet picks their pro vaccine, they're they're make
Speaker 20: America healthy again. Is just going to be a beard
Speaker 20: to sell the vaccine because oh, you got to be healthy.
Speaker 20: We have to take this because I mean, look, jd Vance,
Speaker 20: he owns stock in a lot of the pharmaceuticals. Quite
Speaker 20: a few of his people own stock pharmaceuticals. Why would
Speaker 20: they shut down their their revenue, you know?
Speaker 2: Yeah, And it wasn't It wasn't mister Doje vivek Wwamer
Speaker 2: Schwami's company not only involved with the wine on the
Speaker 2: JAB tracking program, but he had a company that was
Speaker 2: involved with the lipid nanoparticle for the delivery system for
Speaker 2: the MR and A. Wasn't it.
Speaker 20: Yeah. Yeah, Doctor Jane Ruby's covered this extensively. She hammers
Speaker 20: it all the time. And then I looked into JD.
Speaker 20: Vance as myself because she had mentioned that he was
Speaker 20: into the pharmaceutical thing. And I believe one of the companies,
Speaker 20: I can't think of the name of it off the
Speaker 20: top of my head, but it is into this self
Speaker 20: amplifying mRNA. And that's something that Karen Carpenter and I
Speaker 20: we were planning a was it medical industrial complex. Yeah,
Speaker 20: we're going to cover like the gamut of what's oh.
Speaker 2: And your coverage has been excellent, especially as you start
Speaker 2: to reveal stuff information about the self amplifying mRNA. And
Speaker 2: you know, there's been a question as far as whether
Speaker 2: or not people can get JAB slough off, you know,
Speaker 2: shedding of the spike protein that's bad enough that can
Speaker 2: harm people, and that seems to be evident as you've
Speaker 2: seen with some of the women around you. And I
Speaker 2: think that that caused me some problems as well. But
Speaker 2: then there's the added question of whether or not the
Speaker 2: actual mRNA, the so called vaccine, the JAB can be
Speaker 2: spread from person to person already through sweat or blood
Speaker 2: or milk or something like that to a person who
Speaker 2: didn't get injected, and so I've worried about that. I
Speaker 2: don't think that that happened to me. But with the
Speaker 2: self amplifying, that is a really strong possibility.
Speaker 20: It would spread like a virus what we're going to
Speaker 20: talk about, and I think that that will happen. And
Speaker 20: the problem with it is one of their features not
Speaker 20: a bug, is that it's more effective at low doses
Speaker 20: because it starts replicating, So you get one of those
Speaker 20: buggers in you and that's it. And even your attenuated
Speaker 20: live virus vaccines, your traditional vaccines, those they have known
Speaker 20: I got a document I'll be going over. They have
Speaker 20: known that those shed the actual vaccine onto people, and
Speaker 20: they considered it, again, not a bug, but a feature
Speaker 20: because people who didn't opt to get the vaccine are
Speaker 20: getting a little bit of the vaccine against their will, unknowingly,
Speaker 20: and they say that contributes to herd immunity. So I
Speaker 20: think that's what they're trying to do with this self amplifying.
Speaker 20: And what's really scary is they just last month approved
Speaker 20: it in Japan, so I know that people were up
Speaker 20: in arms about it. There was a protest about it.
Speaker 20: Several doctors came out and said, hey, this is like
Speaker 20: the World War iie of medicine. You know it's going
Speaker 20: to be you know, ruined humanity, because I mean, just
Speaker 20: because it's in Japan. How do I know that. I
Speaker 20: don't go to a restaurant and someone just came from
Speaker 20: Japan and it's not like you know, with the spike
Speaker 20: protein shedding, that's for like a couple of weeks after
Speaker 20: they were jabbed, right, shedding was an issue, And I
Speaker 20: have paperwork on that too, where they actually knew that
Speaker 20: and ran standards on researching how long the shedding would occur.
Speaker 20: But when you're talking about self amplifying, it's continuing to
Speaker 20: make more. It's like you're continually getting boosted, so that
Speaker 20: two weeks is it's not two weeks, it's like forever.
Speaker 20: So if somebody comes into a restaurant and sits next
Speaker 20: to me in coughs or something, there's a good possibility
Speaker 20: that they could, you know, months after they were vaccinated,
Speaker 20: that they came from Japan, sat down whatever, they might
Speaker 20: get me vaccinated and even a little bit. It may
Speaker 20: take some time, but it will exponentially grow. That's the theory. Anyway,
Speaker 20: I don't know, I got to look more into it
Speaker 20: that there's just not enough studies to see what it's
Speaker 20: going to do.
Speaker 2: I think that's a really really solid thesis. You know, essentially,
Speaker 2: it is a man made contagion. That's what we're talking
Speaker 2: about here. And you know they've been angling for this
Speaker 2: for a long time. As we know, Bill Gates and
Speaker 2: many others, including Anthony Fauci, have been pushing for this
Speaker 2: stuff for a long long time. Jason, let me ask
Speaker 2: you if you could recommend to people as we look
Speaker 2: at Thanksgiving and we think about gathering with friends and
Speaker 2: we look at the political world, finding that balance is
Speaker 2: key and taking some time to enjoy each other's company.
Speaker 2: You know, you mentioned your neighbor and the puppies, and
Speaker 2: you made me think about Glenn Jacobs. Glenn, you know,
Speaker 2: my friend who played Kine in the WWE. He has
Speaker 2: a farm in Knox County in Tennessee. He's the mayor
Speaker 2: of Knox County and he has a barn that was
Speaker 2: an old horse barn that they've refurbished to allow to
Speaker 2: keep dogs. And they can hold up to thirteen dogs
Speaker 2: that are on the kill lists. They can bring them
Speaker 2: out of the shelters and he keeps them until they
Speaker 2: can be adopted. I don't know how much it must
Speaker 2: cost for thirteen dogs. But let's finish off with some
Speaker 2: thoughts about keeping things local and your hopes for in
Speaker 2: addition to the communications that we get to have here
Speaker 2: on the internet, as I mentioned with Tiger ways, that
Speaker 2: we can talk to each other and our neighbors whether
Speaker 2: we go to church or whatever, and keep those contacts
Speaker 2: going with each other, because, as you say, COVID really
Speaker 2: shot a lot of that down. And if we can
Speaker 2: inspire people and think about Thanksgiving and coming together as family,
Speaker 2: maybe we can think about coming together as localities with
Speaker 2: our neighbors.
Speaker 20: Well. I don't know how you do it in a
Speaker 20: traditional neighborhood nowadays, but here, like I said, our mailboxes
Speaker 20: are up up the road and a lot of people
Speaker 20: who's walk it they get their daily exercise. You could
Speaker 20: take those opportunities, like instead of taking the lawnmower up there,
Speaker 20: I could just kind of wait, hang hang around and
Speaker 20: wait to see somebody walking up there and then go
Speaker 20: get my mail at the same time and have a
Speaker 20: conversation with them. And then you know other things like
Speaker 20: I take little JJ around the neighborhood and I try
Speaker 20: to do it when people are just getting home, like
Speaker 20: after we check the mail running around the neighborhood. It's
Speaker 20: not a very big neighborhood here, but I know people
Speaker 20: are getting there in their garage doing something. They just
Speaker 20: got home, and they'll wave just that being you know,
Speaker 20: I don't know, seeing each other, not being locked in
Speaker 20: your house. Taking those opportunities, UK, you have to kind
Speaker 20: of make the opportunities and then you can stop and
Speaker 20: say hi and stuff. So I've gotten in the last
Speaker 20: several months, I've gotten to know quite a few of
Speaker 20: my neighbors and they've come over here to see what's
Speaker 20: going on with my workshop project and stuff. So, and
Speaker 20: then you start talking about gardening and things. Oh, I
Speaker 20: grow this over here, I'll grow this over here. I
Speaker 20: do this. And then you start talking about, hey, maybe
Speaker 20: we could trade sometime, but you got to you gotta
Speaker 20: meet first. That's the key is you got to meet first,
Speaker 20: and you might have to make that opportunity to do that.
Speaker 20: You know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well stated, you know, it really is amazing. I
Speaker 2: think about some of the hidden blessings I was given
Speaker 2: as a kid, and I didn't even realize it. You know,
Speaker 2: the Driscolls, Missus Driscoll doing the spaghettios and the apple
Speaker 2: pie letting us play in their field. You know, the
Speaker 2: stone walls and the path through the woods, and you
Speaker 2: know all these kindnesses that they gave to us that
Speaker 2: I was able to in some way say to them.
Speaker 2: And she said, oh, it's so nice you to stop buying.
Speaker 2: I brought some food or whatever one time last year
Speaker 2: and I said, well, you know, you helped us out
Speaker 2: and I went and cleared some stuff out. She had
Speaker 2: lost her power, and I cleared some stuff out of
Speaker 2: her driveway last year and she goes, thanks a lot.
Speaker 2: I was like, hey, you know, you helped me when
Speaker 2: I was a kid. I want to help you, you know.
Speaker 2: And I also want to acknowledge inside rockfin some great
Speaker 2: quotes from folks who said some wonderful things and talking
Speaker 2: about the season, and I think it'ssel House f House,
Speaker 2: and my eyes aren't right on it. We can learn
Speaker 2: from each other if we speak in kindness while trying
Speaker 2: to learn. I think that's well stated. And yeah, I
Speaker 2: think that a lot of people are going to hopefully
Speaker 2: learn from each other as time passes and we start
Speaker 2: to see some of the political world. But I'm going
Speaker 2: to keep my mind on those personal connections. And Jason,
Speaker 2: I want to mention to you as I start feeling better.
Speaker 2: What I would like to do is be able to
Speaker 2: travel over and visit with you Tony Ardeburn and see
Speaker 2: David and his family, maybe visit with Glenn and Tennessee,
Speaker 2: and maybe have a spot where not a giant group
Speaker 2: of us, but a group that can make it that
Speaker 2: you know, it's within enough proximity that it's not too far.
Speaker 2: We can get together and give each other high fives,
Speaker 2: and share a meal, and go for some walks and
Speaker 2: have some good times throwing rocks into some lakes and
Speaker 2: stuff like that. That'd be great, wouldn't that.
Speaker 20: Oh, that'd be wonderful. And I did want to say
Speaker 20: one more thing on the building communities. Technology has made
Speaker 20: us all kind of shut ins. Everyone's looking at there,
Speaker 20: even when you're you know, on the bus together or
Speaker 20: the restaurant. You know, you're looking at your phone. Even
Speaker 20: the older people older than me, I catch them doing that.
Speaker 20: But we can use technology to our advantage as well.
Speaker 20: This neighborhood, just like the last two neighborhoods I've lived in,
Speaker 20: has a Facebook group. You know, join that, join the
Speaker 20: Facebook group and maybe do something like you're talking about
Speaker 20: setting up something to bring people out. You could do that.
Speaker 20: Maybe you can say, hey, let's have a neighborhood party
Speaker 20: at the local park. You know, make those opportunities, but
Speaker 20: use tech to your advantage. And I can give you
Speaker 20: one story. There was one Thanksgiving, probably a decade ago
Speaker 20: or more, but my brother, he was deployed, and my
Speaker 20: mom lives up in Iowa, and his family went up
Speaker 20: to Iowa, and then we went up to Iowa and
Speaker 20: we sat around having Thanksgiving dinner, and my brother used
Speaker 20: technology to do a video call and we set the
Speaker 20: laptop at the end of the table and we ate
Speaker 20: and my brother was eating his army meal or Air
Speaker 20: Force meal or whatever. So we were able to commune
Speaker 20: together and have Thanksgiving dinner even though he was in Afghanistan.
Speaker 2: So, oh, that's great. And I think one of the
Speaker 2: key things about that is we did some of that
Speaker 2: during the COVID time. Is if you can open up
Speaker 2: those channels electronically and do so on a regular basis
Speaker 2: with the knowledge or at least the hope that you're
Speaker 2: going to see each other in person, it becomes a
Speaker 2: good it becomes a good regular way to get together.
Speaker 2: Like I'm speaking to you, but I know I'm going
Speaker 2: to see you down the line, and it'll be like, hey, man,
Speaker 2: good to talk to you. We're on the phone. I'll
Speaker 2: see you later. See in school that sort of thing.
Speaker 2: Saw my old friends from high school recently at our reunion,
Speaker 2: and it was so great to see them. And I'm
Speaker 2: going to actually start bringing some of them in to
Speaker 2: reminisce about some of the things as you and I
Speaker 2: have done in their lives that they did as kids.
Speaker 2: Some of the hominales we had, some of the unique
Speaker 2: things that they had someone in their family who was
Speaker 2: so nice. It gets us thinking about members of our
Speaker 2: family too. And so in a way, as we sit
Speaker 2: down to Thanksgiving dinner with our family members or our
Speaker 2: friends tomorrow night, go to a church, visit with people,
Speaker 2: do something that maybe is a voluntary thing to help
Speaker 2: out some folks who might be having a hard time,
Speaker 2: we can think about also how in a way, opening
Speaker 2: this up to you and me right now, the people
Speaker 2: there were all sitting down at the table, We're sitting
Speaker 2: down with our friends and our spirits, our spirits are
Speaker 2: together in this way, and it really is a blessing. Jason.
Speaker 2: I can't tell you how much I appreciate being in
Speaker 2: touch with you. You're one of the really really good
Speaker 2: guys out there, as David is, as Tiger is, so
Speaker 2: many of the people inside the chat, they're just there's
Speaker 2: so much fun. I see also inside a Syrean gol.
Speaker 2: Not to make the transition immediate, but a Seian girl
Speaker 2: is there inside rock Fin Karen Carpenter is there, Dougalug
Speaker 2: is there, Harps I think was there? A handy is there?
Speaker 2: Not to put the HH next to each other. So
Speaker 2: I want to thank you Jason for what you've done.
Speaker 2: And we'll close off just any final sentiments about Thanksgiving
Speaker 2: just again.
Speaker 20: I'll just go back to you know, I'll circle back Saki.
Speaker 20: Forgiveness and thanksgiving go hand in hand. We can't be
Speaker 20: thankful if we don't forgive. So let's make the most
Speaker 20: of our thanksgiving by letting go those things that we
Speaker 20: hold like in our heart that's like bitter. Let that go.
Speaker 20: We could truly be thankful for what we have.
Speaker 2: Awesome, thank you for having me on gard.
Speaker 20: I appreciate it.
Speaker 2: Oh my pleasure. Absolutely happy Thanksgiving. God, bless brother, God, blessed.
Speaker 2: Thank you for what you did for so many people
Speaker 2: and what you continue to do. Thanks Jason, all right,
Speaker 2: rather take care you got it, well, take a quick
Speaker 2: break here at the David Knight Show. Feel free to
Speaker 2: offer your comments inside x. We can post those comments
Speaker 2: inside Rock Fan and Rumble. And thank you again for
Speaker 2: the contributions. As we close off this month for the
Speaker 2: David Knight Show, I am going to go back to
Speaker 2: the Peanuts music actually and play that once more because
Speaker 2: it's so wonderful. And let's do that while I get
Speaker 2: a visit here in the studio from my co pilot,
Speaker 2: the Kittie Cat. She is wonderful. Well, think of Snoopy
Speaker 2: and the dog as I say hello to the cat to.
Speaker 21: The you're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Wonderful music. You can find that available at the David
Speaker 2: night Show website Thedavidnightshow dot com. And thank you to
Speaker 2: Jason Barker for joining us as we get ready for Thanksgiving.
Speaker 2: I'm Gardner Goldsmith coming over from MRCTV and Liberty Conspiracy.
Speaker 2: Liberty Conspiracy, you can join me tonight at six o'clock
Speaker 2: and we're there Monday through Friday at six pm at
Speaker 2: Liberty Conspiracy on Rumble on Rockfinn and my ex which
Speaker 2: is at guard Goldsmith, and I should mention the substack.
Speaker 2: You can go to my substack and my fiction which
Speaker 2: is out there. You can check out my fiction available
Speaker 2: on Amazon. I've got three novellas that are out and
Speaker 2: I've got some short stories that are included in various
Speaker 2: anthologies and things like that for charity. So check it out.
Speaker 2: Just look up Gardner Goldsmith on Amazon. On you'll see Bite,
Speaker 2: which is a vampire story. Has two short stories in
Speaker 2: a des a novella, Wall, which is about crypto archaeology,
Speaker 2: and these two professors in nineteen sixty three who try
Speaker 2: to sneak into China to prove that there was a
Speaker 2: Great Wall of China thousands of years before the original
Speaker 2: Great Wall of China and that it might have been
Speaker 2: built with human blood as part of the mortar. Very strange, mysterious.
Speaker 2: And there's another story called Fishing, which is very dark,
Speaker 2: has a lot of violent scenes in it, but I
Speaker 2: think is one of the best written of the pieces
Speaker 2: that I put out there, and that deals with a
Speaker 2: homicidal maniac who escapes from a police prison transport van
Speaker 2: in nineteen early nineteen seventies Massachusetts and then is on
Speaker 2: the hunt for this young woman who was at one
Speaker 2: of the hippie communes where this killer and the young
Speaker 2: woman were both located. And so hopefully it's interesting, but
Speaker 2: beware on fishing, which I do recommend. There is some
Speaker 2: violent stuff in there, so do be careful on that one.
Speaker 2: So thanks everybody again, check out the Substack, the Liberty
Speaker 2: Conspiracy Show at six o'clock, and don't forget to check
Speaker 2: out the Nights of the Storm for Jason and follow
Speaker 2: Jason at Real Jason Barker and his show The Foxhole
Speaker 2: as well. So great stuff from him. Really appreciate what
Speaker 2: he has done and what Tiger has done, and thank
Speaker 2: you all for contributing and being here. I really appreciate
Speaker 2: everything that you've done here on the David Night Show.
Speaker 2: As we round off the month and we have Thanksgiving
Speaker 2: coming up, want to mention to folks that your contributions
Speaker 2: have been just incredible. Karen Carpenter ten dollars contribution, Mark
Speaker 2: Young ten dollars contribution, Carlos Rex five dollars over at Rockvin.
Speaker 2: Just fantastic stuff, and I see that great comments are
Speaker 2: still flowing throughout all the commentators and the fruits driped
Speaker 2: gum colors of rumble. And so to close things off
Speaker 2: for the last forty minutes of the program, want to
Speaker 2: discuss some news. But also since we were just talking
Speaker 2: with Jason about Thanksgiving, I want to go to what
Speaker 2: I promised. This is a piece that I did for
Speaker 2: MRCTV a number of years ago on of course, the
Speaker 2: true history of Thanksgiving. And since I'm descended from one
Speaker 2: of the people who came over on the Mayflower, his
Speaker 2: name was Richard Gardner. As I mentioned, they founded the
Speaker 2: town of Salem. They were one of the five families
Speaker 2: that founded Salem, Massachusetts. No, we had nothing to do
Speaker 2: with the witch hunts. They also were associated with some
Speaker 2: of the people who founded Peabody, which is right next
Speaker 2: to Salem. It's on the coastline of mass obviously, just
Speaker 2: north of Boston, and they came over and they founded
Speaker 2: Ploymouth Plantation. But what are some of the principles that
Speaker 2: we can derive from the first Thanksgiving and what led
Speaker 2: to the first Thanksgiving? Not just the fact that they celebrated.
Speaker 2: What exactly were they celebrating during the first Thanksgiving? And
Speaker 2: how did the pilgrims get there? And what can that
Speaker 2: tell us? What Eke away lessons can we get from
Speaker 2: the very fact that the Pilgrims came here in the
Speaker 2: first place, and yes they did get along with the Indians,
Speaker 2: they didn't steal property. Here we go, let's check this out.
Speaker 2: This is from a while back on Thanksgiving from me
Speaker 2: at MRCTV, but also moreover the great team on the
Speaker 2: production side of MRCTV. Hi, folks, I'm Gardner Goldsmith for MRCTV,
Speaker 2: and we're almost at Thanksgiving, that time when people get
Speaker 2: together with family and friends and celebrate a holiday that
Speaker 2: is deep within the American heritage. But unfortunately that holiday
Speaker 2: has been mythologized by many government school teachers. So why
Speaker 2: not take this opportunity to go through the real facts
Speaker 2: about Thanksgiving and learn something important that the first Thanksgiving
Speaker 2: was celebrated not to thank the Indians for helping the Pilgrims,
Speaker 2: but in fact, it was celebrated to thank God for
Speaker 2: giving the Pilgrims the opportunity to change their course towards
Speaker 2: private property and prosperity away from communism. Hi. Everyone, Well
Speaker 2: it's a big day in America and I hope you're
Speaker 2: going to be enjoying it with family and friends. I've
Speaker 2: got some information that perhaps you might want to share
Speaker 2: with them, a nice historical item for you, And it's
Speaker 2: all about the tradition of thanksgiving where it comes from.
Speaker 2: In fact, the real story of the Pilgrims starts in
Speaker 2: the sixteen hundreds when a group of Calvinists in England
Speaker 2: decided that they wanted to flee England and move to
Speaker 2: Holland to be living in a more free atmosphere for religion.
Speaker 2: In fact, at the time England was torn asunder by
Speaker 2: battles between the Anglican Protestants and the Catholics, and the Puritans,
Speaker 2: who were Calvinists, decided they wanted to get away from
Speaker 2: it all. For ten years they lived in Holland, and
Speaker 2: in fact they did very well. Jobs were plentiful because
Speaker 2: Holland at that time had just gotten its freedom from
Speaker 2: Spain and was a free market nation. They welcomed people
Speaker 2: from all over the world, and they welcomed all sorts
Speaker 2: of religions as well. Unfortunately, the Calvinist Puritans realized after
Speaker 2: about ten years that some of their children, they said,
Speaker 2: were picking up too many Dutch ways, so they decided
Speaker 2: that they would pick up sticks and move elsewhere. The
Speaker 2: only thing about it was that they didn't have enough
Speaker 2: money to travel to the New World. So here's our
Speaker 2: first lesson in the history of the Pilgrims. They were
Speaker 2: able to get sponsors, rich people to sponsor their trip. Indeed,
Speaker 2: don't tax the rich everybody. They were able to get
Speaker 2: sponsors to come to the New World. Originally they were
Speaker 2: going to have two ships. One of the ships was
Speaker 2: not seaworthy, so they all piled into the mainflower and
Speaker 2: they set sail in the fall of sixteen twenty. They
Speaker 2: landed not were they expected to land, which was going
Speaker 2: to be Virginia, but instead on the coast of Massachusetts,
Speaker 2: where they established Plymouth Plantation in sixteen twenty. They also
Speaker 2: established something that was a big mistake. They established communal property,
Speaker 2: and that led to terrible consequences. In fact, we can
Speaker 2: refer to Governor William Bradford's notes as to why they
Speaker 2: celebrated the first Thanksgiving and what happened when they established
Speaker 2: their first political system communal property. The experience that was
Speaker 2: had in this common course and condition tried sundry years,
Speaker 2: and that amongst godly and sober men, may well evince
Speaker 2: the vanity of that conceit of Plato's and other ancients
Speaker 2: applauded by some of later times that the taking away
Speaker 2: of property and bringing in community into a commonwealth would
Speaker 2: make them happy and flourishing, as if they were wiser
Speaker 2: than God. For this community, so far as it was,
Speaker 2: was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard
Speaker 2: much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort.
Speaker 2: End quote. And that's just the start. Here's more of
Speaker 2: the lesson in William Bradford's own words. For the young
Speaker 2: men that were most able and fit for labor and service,
Speaker 2: did repine that they should spend their time and strength
Speaker 2: to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense.
Speaker 2: The strong or man of parts had no more in
Speaker 2: division of victuals and clothes than he that was weak
Speaker 2: and not able to do a quarter the other could.
Speaker 2: This was thought in justice. The agent and graver men
Speaker 2: to be ranked and equalized in labour's and victuals, clothes, etc.
Speaker 2: With the meager and younger sort. Thought it some in
Speaker 2: dignity and disrespect unto them. And for the feminists out there,
Speaker 2: William Bradford has some information for you on thanks Thanksgiving
Speaker 2: and for men's wives to be commanded to do service
Speaker 2: for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc.
Speaker 2: They deemed it a kind of slavery. Neither could many
Speaker 2: husbands well brook it upon the point all being to
Speaker 2: have a like and all to do alike. They thought
Speaker 2: themselves in the like condition, and one as good as another.
Speaker 2: And so if it did not cut off those relations
Speaker 2: that God had set amongst men, yet it did at
Speaker 2: least much diminish and take off the mutual respects that
Speaker 2: should be preserved amongst men, and would have been worse
Speaker 2: if they had been men of another condition. Let none
Speaker 2: object this in men's corruption, and nothing to the course itself.
Speaker 2: I answer, Seeing all men have this corruption in them,
Speaker 2: God in his wisdom, saw another course fitter for them,
Speaker 2: And that course, ladies and gentlemen, was the establishment of
Speaker 2: private property. Indeed, the Plymouth plantations saw starvation, sloth, and
Speaker 2: anger because they established communal property. But as William Bradford notes,
Speaker 2: they found another way. So they began to think how
Speaker 2: they might raise as much corn as they could and
Speaker 2: obtain a better crop than they had done, that they
Speaker 2: might not still thus languish in misery. At length, after
Speaker 2: much debate of things, the governor with advice of the
Speaker 2: chiefest among them gave way that they should set corn
Speaker 2: every man for his own particular, and in that regard
Speaker 2: trust to themselves in all other things to go on
Speaker 2: in the general way as before, And so assigned to
Speaker 2: every family a parcel of land according to the proportion
Speaker 2: of their number, for that end only for present use,
Speaker 2: but made no division for inheritance, and ranged all boys
Speaker 2: and youth under some family. This had very good success ess,
Speaker 2: for it made all hands very industrious, so as much
Speaker 2: more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by
Speaker 2: any means the governor or any other could use, and
Speaker 2: saved them a great deal of trouble and gave far
Speaker 2: better content. The women now went willingly into the field
Speaker 2: and took their little ones with them to set corn,
Speaker 2: which before would alleged weakness and inability, whom to have
Speaker 2: compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression. Enough said,
Speaker 2: the first Thanksgiving was put together by the Pilgrims as
Speaker 2: a celebration to thank God for getting them away from collectivism.
Speaker 2: They were able to prosper. Governor Bradford notes that they
Speaker 2: had all sorts of wonderful results, much more corn, much
Speaker 2: more food, and they were able to trade the surplus
Speaker 2: that the Pilgrims were able to gain because of their
Speaker 2: private property establishment is what led to them being able
Speaker 2: to invite the Indians to sit down to the first Thanksgiving.
Speaker 2: That's the lesson of Thanksgiving. Thanks so much for watching.
Speaker 2: Don't forget to like and subscribe. Well, I hope that
Speaker 2: was all right, everybody. I think that was a little
Speaker 2: bit low on the volume there. I apologize. It's a
Speaker 2: tricky trying to manage the system there, and sometimes what
Speaker 2: I'll do is record something and then amp it up
Speaker 2: in the volume and so on. But I really appreciate
Speaker 2: what the MRCTV team did there getting the stock footage,
Speaker 2: and that was wonderful. And hopefully I did a little
Speaker 2: something that allows maybe the spirits of my ancestors to
Speaker 2: smile and say, oh yay, you know, he's he's doing
Speaker 2: a little something in our memory there, and for the
Speaker 2: principle of it all as well. Now, I do have
Speaker 2: some different takes on Thanksgiving that you might enjoy as well.
Speaker 2: So let's take a spoof look at Thanksgiving. This is
Speaker 2: something that I actually produced for my radio show a
Speaker 2: long time ago. This one is the government runs school
Speaker 2: version of the First Thanksgiving.
Speaker 22: New Hampshire Scholastic Films presents the true story of Thanksgiving.
Speaker 22: Many people have expressed frustration over the modern interpretation of
Speaker 22: America's most unique holiday. That's why we here in New
Speaker 22: Hampshire's tax funded public schools have created a new, dramatical
Speaker 22: retelling of the way it really happened. Elastic Films and
Speaker 22: association with the NEA and American Teachers' Union now give
Speaker 22: you the true meaning of Thanksgiving. When the Pilgrims of
Speaker 22: England landed on Plymouth Rocks, they tried to farm and
Speaker 22: raise prompts, but there was no government program to tell
Speaker 22: them how to do.
Speaker 2: It, and so they failed.
Speaker 22: Hold near starvation, the Pilgrims got help from powerful aliens
Speaker 22: who swept down into the area to help them live
Speaker 22: under better control. Soon they were happy, but in months
Speaker 22: the alien plan for the Pilgrims became revealed.
Speaker 5: Mister Chambers, don't get on that ship after the book.
Speaker 11: To third Man's.
Speaker 22: Book, the First Thanksgiving was planned by the aliens to
Speaker 22: consume our heroic settlers. But suddenly Governor William Bradford, armed
Speaker 22: with his new Pilgrim laser cannon, emerged to blast the
Speaker 22: aliens to bits, and thus was the first Thanksgiving born
Speaker 22: as the settlers in Plymouth's plantation feasted.
Speaker 2: On the steaming remains of their alien.
Speaker 22: Attackers and gave thanks to the government program that helped
Speaker 22: Governor William Bradford blow them into tiny pie. And this
Speaker 22: has been a New Hampshire government's scope presentation.
Speaker 2: Yeah about that, huh, A little truth there from the
Speaker 2: NEA and your local school board. Very important stuff. Now,
Speaker 2: I have to say, as you might have guessed, we
Speaker 2: got some feedback about that original presentation that we put
Speaker 2: on the radio here in New Hampshire. A lot of
Speaker 2: people wrote to us and say, hey, hey, you were
Speaker 2: way off base on that original Thanksgiving story. You better
Speaker 2: fix that. And lo and behold, you know what we
Speaker 2: did here it is we have more we hear at
Speaker 2: New Hampshire.
Speaker 22: Scholastic Films have received some criticism that our first film
Speaker 22: strip on Thanksgiving shown two thousands of impressionable children all
Speaker 22: over the state.
Speaker 23: Was not quite active.
Speaker 22: We mistakenly claim that the first Thanksgiving was a feast
Speaker 22: celebrating our victory over the forces of evil in an
Speaker 22: intergalectic war.
Speaker 20: That wasn't quite right.
Speaker 22: In fact, the first Thanksgiving was a celebration of common
Speaker 22: people overcoming starvation with the help of a greater power. Yes,
Speaker 22: when the Pilgrims were starving, they prayed for help and
Speaker 22: were answered by the spirit of John Denver channeling through
Speaker 22: Governor William Bradford.
Speaker 2: Also makes me.
Speaker 22: Thanks to John Denver, the pilgrims thrived and achieve their
Speaker 22: own communion with nature. This has been another New Hampshire
Speaker 22: Scholastic presentation.
Speaker 2: All Right, I do like John Denver's music, but I
Speaker 2: don't think praying to the Spirit of John Denver is
Speaker 2: exactly what people are thinking about at Thanksgiving. But that
Speaker 2: was a lot of fun and I want to thank
Speaker 2: again my producer at that time, Jason Richardson, just fantastic
Speaker 2: finding the old style laser sound and we use the
Speaker 2: picture of Tom Baker from Doctor Who oh Man. Just
Speaker 2: great stuff, awesome, awesome stuff. Those were fun days at
Speaker 2: wgi R after Rush Limbaugh. So let's talk a little bit.
Speaker 2: I believe someone in the chat mentioned social security being attacks. Well,
Speaker 2: let's talk a little bit about just that. How the
Speaker 2: government seems to during Thanksgiving, seems to want to communalize everything,
Speaker 2: and so we're gonna have a little theme. Right now, everybody,
Speaker 2: it's time for the best band that I know coming
Speaker 2: out of San Antonio, Texas to talk about social security
Speaker 2: and the ripoff of social secure. You already, oh my.
Speaker 23: Boy, they'll hope them to see them just a lying
Speaker 23: off the back.
Speaker 2: We can't get I'm puting some ten of lack and
Speaker 2: I can trot your man's got you, y'all a rack way.
Speaker 23: I'm thinking that they.
Speaker 15: Don't have a hot tack.
Speaker 7: I'm y'alla gotta have a poun you don't knock a
Speaker 7: big hot loll going, then roll with the pound and
Speaker 7: they can.
Speaker 2: They give me some, and they given't give me some,
Speaker 2: Give me some and.
Speaker 8: Then give me give me song.
Speaker 2: I yeh, the professionals. But what the deem the first
Speaker 2: I haven't thought it was. This is the theme that
Speaker 2: I often like to use for government taking people's money
Speaker 2: and then handing it out in social welfare programs. Sometimes
Speaker 2: I'll use gimme, gimme, gimme by Black Flag, gimme gimme
Speaker 2: gimme some by that band, the Sons of Hercules, just
Speaker 2: a fantastic band from San Antono. They are great. And
Speaker 2: now I want to give you the new fold to
Speaker 2: the giant Ponzi scheme that is still the legacy of
Speaker 2: the corrupt, deceptive, lying jerk mister FDR Yes social Security
Speaker 2: Benzinga reported this five days ago, and I wanted to
Speaker 2: bring it up to you today on the program. I
Speaker 2: was going to bring it up on Liberty Conspiracy last night,
Speaker 2: and I forgot. I finished off the program and I said,
Speaker 2: oh man, I got to make up for that. So
Speaker 2: check this out, one and all. Here is the headline.
Speaker 2: See what you think about this House passes one hundred
Speaker 2: and ninety six billion Social Security bill. You know not
Speaker 2: the United States is in thirty six trillion in debt
Speaker 2: and accruing another trillion every hundred days. It says, will
Speaker 2: repealing pension reductions shorten the program's lifespan? What does that mean?
Speaker 2: Will repealing pension reductions shorten the program's lifespan? Well, it
Speaker 2: really doesn't have very much to do with anything. Here
Speaker 2: here's the actual story. On November twelfth, the US House
Speaker 2: of Representatives past checked us out. The word fairness is
Speaker 2: in there, so you know, alarm bells might be going off.
Speaker 2: On November twelfth, the US House of Representatives passed the
Speaker 2: Social Security Fairness Act. Now, how is taking people's money,
Speaker 2: holding on to it, handing it to people today, and
Speaker 2: then promising other people's money to you fair. How is
Speaker 2: the taking in the first place fair? How do they
Speaker 2: call it social security? Why don't they just call it socialism?
Speaker 2: I don't know. That's a pretty simple idea to me. Yes,
Speaker 2: it's a bipartisan bill, thank you, d's and ours, and
Speaker 2: it sets in motion an elimination of two long standing
Speaker 2: provisions that currently get this, according to Benzinga, reduced social
Speaker 2: security benefits for public sector employees. Oh that just well,
Speaker 2: it's fairness, of course. Here's the rub ay, there's the
Speaker 2: rub Shakespeare or Christopher Marlowe. If you look into it,
Speaker 2: it looks like it was Christopher Marlowe. Yes, the public
Speaker 2: sector employees. Guess what, everybody, they didn't have to pay
Speaker 2: into social security on the large part for this chunk.
Speaker 2: This is extra money that they never even had taken
Speaker 2: from them. This is more redistribution of wealth for public
Speaker 2: government employees. Here it is. The legislation was first in
Speaker 2: introduced in twenty twenty three bipartisans, So you know, it's
Speaker 2: got to be wonderful and will now head to the
Speaker 2: Senate from the House where it has strong bipartisan support. Shocker.
Speaker 2: If passed, it is estimated to cost one hundred and
Speaker 2: ninety six billion dollars over the next decade. Well, hey,
Speaker 2: that's a deal. It's a lot less than what they've been.
Speaker 2: If you estimate it out and you know, amortize it
Speaker 2: over ten years for Ukraine, there'd be a lot more
Speaker 2: than one hundred and sixty ninety six billion. There were
Speaker 2: There are one hundred and twenty billion right now. It's
Speaker 2: just over a couple of years. Maybe it's a deal.
Speaker 2: Maybe we should go to Ukraine and get that. Critics
Speaker 2: worry that enacting this bill could further exacerbate social securities
Speaker 2: funding challenges. Oh, you mean taking more money from a
Speaker 2: system that's already bankrupt and bleeding off of people to
Speaker 2: pay for current recipients. Bleeding from people who are working now,
Speaker 2: the giant Ponzi scheme of Generation xers having to pay
Speaker 2: for the Baby boomers. Hey, how about not doing that?
Speaker 2: Could I be free?
Speaker 19: No?
Speaker 2: You can't. Now check this out, they say this, what
Speaker 2: does the Social Security Fairness Act do? This is amazing.
Speaker 2: The bill addresses two key provisions. It addresses two key provisions,
Speaker 2: so they're already saying that they're already giving you the
Speaker 2: implication that there's some problem that it needs to address. Okay, No,
Speaker 2: it creates this added to this Social Security Act in
Speaker 2: nineteen eighty three that affect public sector workers. So what
Speaker 2: they're saying is, in nineteen eighty three, there were two
Speaker 2: key provisions added to Roosevelt's Social Security Act, and that
Speaker 2: this new Social Security Fairness Act addresses what has been
Speaker 2: a long standing problem since nineteen eighty three when they
Speaker 2: did this terrible thing to public sector workers. Again, Read
Speaker 2: that again. The bill addresses two key provisions added to
Speaker 2: the Social Security Act in nineteen eighty three that affect
Speaker 2: public sector workers. Oh my, goodness, I sounded like the
Speaker 2: Starhustle their Jack Herkimer. They affect public sector workers. Oh my.
Speaker 2: If you look in the southwestern sky, you'll see public
Speaker 2: sector workers at twilight. Here it is. Check this out,
Speaker 2: the Windfall Elimination Provision Web. I wept myself. This rule
Speaker 2: reduces this is from nineteen eighty three. This is a problem,
Speaker 2: according to them, that they're addressing now with this New
Speaker 2: Fairness Act. This nineteen eighty three rule reduces social security
Speaker 2: benefits for individuals who receive pensions from jobs where they
Speaker 2: didn't pay Social Security taxes. There it is, there it is.
Speaker 2: So the nineteen eighty three rule actually is a little
Speaker 2: closer to reality, which is, hey, you know what, if
Speaker 2: you were a government employee and you didn't have to
Speaker 2: pay into Social Security taxes, maybe you shouldn't be getting
Speaker 2: money from Social Security. Maybe. I don't know, call me nuts,
Speaker 2: but that nineteen eighty three point seems kind of valid. Eh, well,
Speaker 2: this fixes it. You see. We need to take care
Speaker 2: of that because it's just not fair. See, we need
Speaker 2: to give them money because there it is. Yeah. And
Speaker 2: of course, according to the Congressional Research Service, only about
Speaker 2: two point one million people are affected by this provision. Yeah,
Speaker 2: because there are so many people who work for gobment.
Speaker 2: And there's more. The government pension offset, Yes, the government
Speaker 2: pension offset. The GPO reduces Social Security benefits for spouses,
Speaker 2: widows and widowers who receive government pensions. Similar thing, but
Speaker 2: this is for the people, the people married to or
Speaker 2: related to the people who shouldn't have gotten the government
Speaker 2: money in the first place. Now, even if those original
Speaker 2: people are dead, well, their spouses can get the money
Speaker 2: that they actually never saw their spouse pay into Social Security,
Speaker 2: they'll be able to get the extra money. A happy Thanksgiving.
Speaker 2: About seven hundred and forty five thousand individuals currently reduced
Speaker 2: benefits under this provision. Those in support of repealing these
Speaker 2: rules argue that they unfairly penalize retired teachers, police officers, firefighters,
Speaker 2: and other public servants. Their public servants, therefore they deserve
Speaker 2: of their servants. Oh wait, or were you their servant?
Speaker 2: I think it's the other way around, don't you. I
Speaker 2: think perhaps that you were their servant. Once they got
Speaker 2: those jobs, you were the servant. You kept paying their
Speaker 2: salary whether you were satisfied or not. They eliminated your
Speaker 2: ability to actually have an equality control over any of
Speaker 2: these things. Did you ask for the firefighter protection?
Speaker 22: No?
Speaker 2: Did you ask for the police protection? How much? When,
Speaker 2: with whom? What are they policing? I don't know. It's
Speaker 2: all imposed on you for your protection. Again the anarchist argument.
Speaker 2: There you go, So there we are everybody. That's a
Speaker 2: wonderful thing. But remember it's all for your benefit. If
Speaker 2: only there could be some way to I don't know,
Speaker 2: rig the system in favor of you. Maybe I'll I
Speaker 2: don't know, becoming say a journalist or something like that,
Speaker 2: and perhaps getting on the gravy train of corruption. Oh
Speaker 2: I don't know, maybe receiving half a million dollars for
Speaker 2: some organization you start and getting that money from Oh
Speaker 2: I don't know. Kamala Harris is residential campaign. Yes, there's
Speaker 2: a new story all about that. And it's fun. Here,
Speaker 2: it is here, It is everybody. Yes, if you want
Speaker 2: to know how to make Guard laugh, well, this might
Speaker 2: be one of the ways, as I feel it for
Speaker 2: David Knight, thanks for being here, everybody as we get
Speaker 2: ready for Thanksgiving. And yes, John Denver, God rushed your soul,
Speaker 2: John Denver, here it is everybody. MSNBC was unaware, unaware. Gee,
Speaker 2: maybe MSNBC should definitely be broken off from its parent company.
Speaker 2: Was unaware that the Harris campaign gave five hundred thousand
Speaker 2: dollars to Al Sharpton's group ahead of a friendly interview.
Speaker 2: Now I know you're saying, wait, g man, Guard Al
Speaker 2: Sharpton's great, He's I mean, the whole Tawana Brawlly thing
Speaker 2: was so on above board, It was on the up
Speaker 2: and up. You know, that was totally honest, and that's
Speaker 2: how Al Sharpton made his name.
Speaker 6: Nat.
Speaker 2: He was already really really well known as a grifter
Speaker 2: in New York. But hey, you know, why not grift nationally?
Speaker 2: When I get a spot with the grifting network MSNBC, well,
Speaker 2: you know, when they're not messing around on Morning Joe
Speaker 2: and bringing in frauds like Mike Barnacle, you know who
Speaker 2: made up stuff when he was writing for the Boston
Speaker 2: Globe and tried to pass it off as real and
Speaker 2: they hired him at MSNBC. He was run out of
Speaker 2: Boston on a rail. It was just amazing. He was
Speaker 2: the emblem of the despicable, repulsive left wing Boston Globe newspaper.
Speaker 2: He was like the face of the Boston Globe. And
Speaker 2: of course then he was exposed for being complete, completely fraud.
Speaker 2: But there we have MSNBC. Now what's this about? Ah,
Speaker 2: there's al looking good, looking good there al well. MSNBC
Speaker 2: admitted it was unaware, and as I mentioned on Liberty
Speaker 2: Conspiracy last night, they admitted that they were unaware. They
Speaker 2: admitted they were unaware that Vice President Kamala Harris the
Speaker 2: campaign paid a half a million dollars to Al Sharpton's
Speaker 2: National Action Network nonprofit ahead of a friendly interview with
Speaker 2: the Democrat nominee ahead of election day. These are the
Speaker 2: people who praised the government suppressing our ability just to
Speaker 2: put out links on Twitter and Facebook. And they're paying
Speaker 2: Al Sharpton to work on their network and his nonprofit
Speaker 2: is getting half a million dollars from Kamala Harris's campaign.
Speaker 2: You can't make this stuff up. And they've got the
Speaker 2: gall on Morning Joe and MSNBC to talk about us
Speaker 2: who want to just express our ideas, people like doctor
Speaker 2: Campbell trying to get information out that it's healthy to suppress, yes,
Speaker 2: our ability to communicate with each other. Well, they're glad
Speaker 2: handling and doing these backbroom deals to put out their theater.
Speaker 2: They're theatrics of politics on MSNBC. They've got George Stephanopolis
Speaker 2: working for ABC. He was working on the Bimbo eruption
Speaker 2: stuff with Hillary Clinton for Bill Clinton. They trot out
Speaker 2: on Cable News, they trod out John Brennan, James Clapper.
Speaker 2: These people are war criminals. They're just it's unbelievable. Barack
Speaker 2: Obama is a war criminal. Joe Biden is a war criminal.
Speaker 2: Even as even Donald Trump engaged in extra judicial murder
Speaker 2: using drone strikes. And killing people without any declaration of war.
Speaker 2: Here's more, this is just wonderful. This is great. It
Speaker 2: was the National Action Network. It's a non p and
Speaker 2: Harris sat down for a friendly interview on October twentieth
Speaker 2: at with MSNBC's Al Sharpton, an open supporter of Harris
Speaker 2: and the Democrat Party, following Harris's loss to President elect
Speaker 2: Donald Trump. Who was the best loss? I really liked
Speaker 2: that loss was wonderful. Federal Election Commission filings revealed the
Speaker 2: Harris campaign gave two two hundred and fifty thousand dollars
Speaker 2: donations to Sharpton's nonprofit organization in September and October. So
Speaker 2: remember the interview was on October twentieth, but these donations
Speaker 2: were at least one of them before the interview. But MSNBC,
Speaker 2: the MSNBC host, did not inform viewers of the contributions
Speaker 2: or the conflict of interest before or after the interview.
Speaker 2: Here's a quote from an MSNBC spokesperson. MSNBC was unaware
Speaker 2: of the donations made to the National Action Network, they
Speaker 2: told the Free Beacon, which broke the story. The Freebeacon
Speaker 2: added that Sharpton did not inform network Brass that his
Speaker 2: nonprofit received money from the Harris campaign. MSNBC declined to
Speaker 2: say if Sharpton would face consequences, according to the report.
Speaker 2: MSNBC did not respond to multiple requests for additional comment
Speaker 2: from Fox News Digital. Sharpton appeared at NBC as recent
Speaker 2: MSNBC as recently as Monday on Morning Joe. So they
Speaker 2: already they have this information and they're still bringing them
Speaker 2: out and they're not even asking them about it. It's comical.
Speaker 2: It's just out of control, crazy, holy molly, Oh my goodness,
Speaker 2: just nuts. Oh by the way, let's just remember a
Speaker 2: couple real quick things before we go. Donald Trump coming
Speaker 2: in seen as the big answer for so many people. Well,
Speaker 2: I mentioned this before the matter of immigration is popping up.
Speaker 2: There's gonna be a big battle as the Dems and
Speaker 2: the Republicans on that political side they start to fight.
Speaker 2: I had a piece and a video that it did
Speaker 2: for m RCTV about Democrat governors and mayors, whether it's
Speaker 2: the governor of Massachusetts, Mar Healy, Kathy Hulkel, the governor
Speaker 2: of Illinois Pritzker, the governor of California, the mayor of Denver. Well,
Speaker 2: there's a big debate about immigration coming up everybody, and
Speaker 2: in fact, let's hear a little theme for that. I
Speaker 2: like to play this because my sister hates this song.
Speaker 24: It's Wall of Voodoo with Mexican Radiohold and.
Speaker 6: The bad the world that is over the.
Speaker 7: World, the.
Speaker 2: Number I lean on, the bluer, I hear the real
Speaker 2: music about the road, the dam or us.
Speaker 13: I hear they dja on.
Speaker 21: Radio.
Speaker 6: I'm on radio.
Speaker 2: What a great song with the old beat up Jeloppy
Speaker 2: card oh Man, Stan Ridgeway and Mexican radio. Great song
Speaker 2: from Wall of Voodoo. He is the main lyricist songwriter.
Speaker 2: But yeah, folks, there's some big stuff brewing. People are
Speaker 2: already sounding off. They're saying they're going to oppose Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: And yet another already is now saying they're going to
Speaker 2: oppose Donald Trump. And here it is, California Bay Area
Speaker 2: City considers ordinance blocking local resources from supporting Trump mass deportations.
Speaker 2: We discussed this yesterday. The Article four, Section four of
Speaker 2: the Constitution does not allow the federal government to be
Speaker 2: sending troops in unless states ask for those troops to
Speaker 2: be coming in. And here we go. The Redwood City
Speaker 2: Council in California, voted four to three in favor of
Speaker 2: calling for staff to draft an ordinance for consideration that
Speaker 2: would restrict the city from cooperating with immigration authorities. Council
Speaker 2: voted four to three in Redwood, California to direct staff
Speaker 2: to place an ordinance restricting the use of city resources
Speaker 2: YEP to cooperate with ICE on a future agenda in
Speaker 2: the first quarter of twenty twenty five. So that is
Speaker 2: in Redwood City, California. We know that Governor Newsom has
Speaker 2: gotten his ags together. They haven't officially announced what they're
Speaker 2: going to do, but there are a lot of Democrats
Speaker 2: who actually are stumbling across the actual constitutional framework of
Speaker 2: states deciding for themselves what they're going to do for immigration. Again,
Speaker 2: the word immigration is not in the Constitution. But Tom Holman,
Speaker 2: who appears to be pretty well situated as coming in
Speaker 2: as Donald Trump's big ice man. Tom Holman says he
Speaker 2: will jail a particular mayor for challenging Trump's deportation efforts.
Speaker 2: This is Denver. This is the one that I reported
Speaker 2: on from RCTV. Wrote this on Sunday, and it's getting
Speaker 2: more intense. In coming borders are Tom Holman zar maybe
Speaker 2: don't use that word. Maybe don't have the federal government
Speaker 2: handling immigration if you want to call yourself a constitutionalist
Speaker 2: out there, y'all right, says he's willing to throw Denver
Speaker 2: Mayor Mike Johnston in jail over his protests about mass deportation. Ah,
Speaker 2: there's nothing like sounding like a bully. But look, me
Speaker 2: and the Denver mayor, we agree on one thing. Pronoun us. No, sorry,
Speaker 2: he's willing to go to jail. I'm willing to put
Speaker 2: him in jail because there's a statute. It's Title eight
Speaker 2: United States Code, thirteen twenty four, sub Section three, and
Speaker 2: what it says is it's a felony if you knowingly
Speaker 2: harbor and conceal an illegal alien from immigration authorities. It's
Speaker 2: also a felony to impede a federal law enforcement officer.
Speaker 2: Holman told Sean Hannity, who obviously had that pin, so
Speaker 2: he's very patriotic on his lapel during an interview on
Speaker 2: Fox News last night. Wow, the breaking news of people
Speaker 2: who don't even pay attention to the Constitution and instead
Speaker 2: look at unconstitutional US Code, Because it would be nice
Speaker 2: if they actually bothered to read the Constitution. And you
Speaker 2: can challenge. Anybody find the word immigration in constitutions not there.
Speaker 2: Naturalization is, but immigration is not. All. These people are
Speaker 2: playing in a completely fictitious, fraudulent world, and they're citing
Speaker 2: statutes that are unconstitutional, very clearly unconstitutional. And of course
Speaker 2: they're going to be breaching people's privacy, they're going to
Speaker 2: be taking away people's opportunities. And they would perhaps do
Speaker 2: much better in decentralizing things. But there you go. Got
Speaker 2: to have central planning for everybody, you know, just like
Speaker 2: combating the virus, right, central planning. Everything's got to be
Speaker 2: done centrally. Donald Trump knows best, does he know best?
Speaker 2: Guess what you know?
Speaker 3: How?
Speaker 2: I'm a free market economist. I teach economics. I understand
Speaker 2: that tariffs are bad mojo, even though they are in
Speaker 2: the constitution. Well, our final story here is, yes, already
Speaker 2: before Donald Trump even gets into office, his threatened tariffs
Speaker 2: of sixty percent tariffs against Chinese goods, ten percent to
Speaker 2: twenty percent against all other goods, including some from Canada
Speaker 2: and Mexico. Well, here it is. Mexico suggests it would
Speaker 2: impose its own tariffs to retaliate against any Trump tariffs.
Speaker 2: So already the tariffs are going to be harming American consumers.
Speaker 2: It's a tax that will be passed on in most
Speaker 2: cases to the consumers. It protects specially favored businesses in
Speaker 2: the United States from foreign competition. Where do you draw
Speaker 2: the line to try to block competition against your favorite industry,
Speaker 2: against the essential versus non essential that Donald Trump will
Speaker 2: know choose through tariffs? Can you have a tariff from
Speaker 2: state to state? Oh? No? The founders, in their wisdom
Speaker 2: at least said that's a bad idea. Or is it
Speaker 2: that you should protect local American businesses? Well, why not
Speaker 2: just make sure that you protect the local businesses in
Speaker 2: your town. Make it such that you can't import anything
Speaker 2: unless it's made inside your town. You can't buy anything
Speaker 2: unless it's made inside your town. You can't import anything
Speaker 2: made outside your town. What's going to happen to your
Speaker 2: costs and productivity? What are you going to start doing.
Speaker 2: You're going to have to start devoting more time and
Speaker 2: energy to get the stuff that you could have gotten
Speaker 2: from somebody else who might have a natural advantage or
Speaker 2: some other advantage through technology that they've developed. Why not trade?
Speaker 2: Why not do what you do very well and let
Speaker 2: them do what they do very well and get the
Speaker 2: busy body middleman out of it from the government. That
Speaker 2: might be a good idea. South. The South, the states
Speaker 2: of the South that fled the Norse in the so
Speaker 2: called Civil War, which was the war of Northern aggression
Speaker 2: against the South that just wanted to leave. They seemed
Speaker 2: to have a problem with the tariffs. And when people say, well,
Speaker 2: you know, nobody, even Thomas Jefferson, we balanced the budget
Speaker 2: and nobody had to see the tax man. So, in
Speaker 2: other words, they stopped excise taxes, but they still had tariffs,
Speaker 2: excise taxes on products made in the United States. They
Speaker 2: didn't have an income tax. Under Jefferson. They balanced the budget,
Speaker 2: they brought things down on expenses. Okay, yep, but they
Speaker 2: had tariffs. So Jefferson was wrong. Somebody did see the
Speaker 2: tax man, and the South they definitely recognized it by
Speaker 2: the time Abraham Lincoln was there, because they had gained
Speaker 2: the system of teriffts to favor northern industrial interests against
Speaker 2: the South, which wanted in many cases there wanted to
Speaker 2: buy materials from outside the US, but they had to
Speaker 2: favor the domestic makers the essentials, and the politicians decided
Speaker 2: so Donald Trump. This is a exactly what he's doing.
Speaker 2: And he did the same thing with washing machine manufacturers
Speaker 2: and dishwashing manufacturers in Ohio and it was a disaster.
Speaker 2: Expenses went way way up for people buying those things.
Speaker 2: That's money that could be leveraged and used on other
Speaker 2: things in America. Why do you want to make it
Speaker 2: more expensive for people to get something that can help
Speaker 2: their lives and then they could save money and spend
Speaker 2: it on something else that could grow in the economy.
Speaker 2: Why do you have to decide with central planning what
Speaker 2: is good or not good for us? Why can't we
Speaker 2: decide Donald the President. Claudia Shinebomb of Mexico suggested Tuesday
Speaker 2: that Mexico could retaliate with tariffs of its own after
Speaker 2: US President elect Donald Trump threatened to impose twenty five
Speaker 2: percent import duties on Mexican goods if the country doesn't
Speaker 2: stop the flow of drugs and migrants across the border.
Speaker 2: It's just amazing, amazing, she says. One teriff would be
Speaker 2: followed by another in response, and so on until we
Speaker 2: put at risk common businesses. Shinbaum said, referring to US
Speaker 2: automakers that have plants on both sides of the border.
Speaker 2: The elites. They and you know, people seem to think
Speaker 2: that Donald Trump identifies with the average person. If he
Speaker 2: identified with the average person, he wouldn't play favorites with unions.
Speaker 2: He wouldn't impose his will over yours on what you
Speaker 2: can buy. He leave you alone. Yes, terrifts are allowed
Speaker 2: in the Constitution. But again, I'm an anarchist. I'm a voluntarist.
Speaker 2: I want no human ruler over my neighbor. I don't
Speaker 2: want to impose my rule over somebody else. I go
Speaker 2: with the ancient Irish Brehon Losso system. I would prefer that,
Speaker 2: but I would at least go to the Constitution. But
Speaker 2: even there, please use your discretion. Donald recognis the economic
Speaker 2: fallacy that is the tariff. So I'll leave it at that.
Speaker 2: And I thank you so much for joining me on
Speaker 2: the program today, The David Knight Show. What a fantastic,
Speaker 2: fantastic group of people. I want to thank Jason Barker
Speaker 2: for being a guest today and Anger Tiger for being
Speaker 2: a guest yesterday. Thank you everyone for being there and
Speaker 2: being aware of these things. Matthew Ronson says, it's the
Speaker 2: art of the steel Trump tariffs. Thank you man, thank you.
Speaker 2: I see also in rumble Wow, holy smoke, I'm glad.
Speaker 2: I'm going a couple of minutes extra here, Flower Sower
Speaker 2: one hundred and twenty five dollars contribution, Flower Sewer, what fantastic,
Speaker 2: Thank you so much, Happy Thanksgiving, he says, thankful for
Speaker 2: the David Knight, for David Knight and family. God bless
Speaker 2: and have a wonderful Thanksgiving. He really is a great
Speaker 2: guy and just talking to everybody. Really, if you get
Speaker 2: a chance to talk to David, you'll love him. He's
Speaker 2: such a you hear him every day. And don't oh
Speaker 2: b three y, I hope I'm reading that right, Oh
Speaker 2: don't obey with lait speak, says find all the contribution.
Speaker 2: Hope everyone has a great holiday, be good, all with
Speaker 2: prayers and hearts heads on a swivel. Thank you David
Speaker 2: Knight's show, and thank you so much to everyone. I'll
Speaker 2: be joining the team, the team from Deepest Darkest Russia
Speaker 2: on Liberty Conspiracy at six o'clock tonight. We'll share some
Speaker 2: of those skits about Thanksgiving and so on, and some
Speaker 2: more stories and some good rock and roll and some
Speaker 2: good stories about economics philosophy that I get to teach
Speaker 2: and so on and some breaking news. And thank you
Speaker 2: so much for being here everybody. I hope you have
Speaker 2: a fantastic Thanksgiving. I will be praying for or all
Speaker 2: of the wonderful people I've seen in your names here.
Speaker 2: I like to think about all you folks, be praying
Speaker 2: for David, for our guests, and for future generations out there.
Speaker 2: Thanks everyone, We'll leave you with David Knight's terrific composition
Speaker 2: of the common Man. Please do visit the David Knights
Speaker 2: Show at the Davidnightshow dot com. And of course, if
Speaker 2: you get the opportunity, check out the store because I
Speaker 2: think you'll enjoy everything that's there. And I say thanks
Speaker 2: again for the opportunity from David. Thank you so much everybody,
Speaker 2: David Knight family, you are great. We'll see you tonight
Speaker 2: on a Liberty Conspiracy. I'm Gardner Goldsman signing off. Take
Speaker 2: care of everybody, God bless and happy Thanksgiving.
Speaker 7: The common Man. They created common Core. They've done down
Speaker 7: our children. They created common pass asked to track and
Speaker 7: control us, their Commons project to make sure the commoners
Speaker 7: own nothing, and the communist future. They see the common
Speaker 7: man as simple unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has
Speaker 7: worth and dignity created in the image of God.
Speaker 20: That is what we have in common.
Speaker 7: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 7: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 7: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 7: time to turn that around and expose what they want
Speaker 7: to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
Speaker 7: at the davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
Speaker 7: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 7: keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot Com
Speaker 23: Has introduct atsists