Speaker 1: No bed of their.
Speaker 2: Hello and welcome to the show. This is the Cult
Speaker 2: of Conspiracy, and my name is Jonathan, I'm Jacob, and
Speaker 2: today we are going to be getting into one of
Speaker 2: the grand glory holes of all conspiracy, the try Lateral Commission.
Speaker 2: You ready, Jacob, really? Oh yeah, baby? This is a
Speaker 2: conspiracy theorist wet dream looking up this kind of stuff.
Speaker 2: This is old school dates all the way back. But
Speaker 2: guess what, it's still around. It's still pulling the strings,
Speaker 2: and we're about to find out just who is controlling
Speaker 2: the fucking world. So if if you ain't got nothing
Speaker 2: better to do for the next few hours, sit down,
Speaker 2: listen up, open up that third eye, and fucking just
Speaker 2: enjoy the blessings of knowledge that are about to be
Speaker 2: soaked upon you.
Speaker 3: I gotta ask you, Jonathan, the Trilateral Commission. I've talked
Speaker 3: about it before. I've thought about doing some research on
Speaker 3: it to do an episode on what led you down
Speaker 3: this rabbit hole?
Speaker 1: Bro?
Speaker 3: What like neuggative information did you find that started this spiral?
Speaker 2: Well, it's funny you asked that, because it was actually
Speaker 2: a good cult member that reached out and said, hey,
Speaker 2: you guys, haven't done a u a Trilateral Commission episode
Speaker 2: yet and I was like, that's interesting. Yeah, we're at
Speaker 2: episode six hundred and god knows what episode right now,
Speaker 2: and we haven't really i mean we've touched on it,
Speaker 2: we've never really gotten deep into it. And uh, this
Speaker 2: is something that you know a lot of people call
Speaker 2: Alex Jones a shill because he doesn't call out the Jews. Okay,
Speaker 2: that's why people call him a shill is strictly because
Speaker 2: of that reason, because they think that the Jewels, the Jews,
Speaker 2: control the world, the Jews criteria, that's one of them.
Speaker 1: The case, then.
Speaker 3: I'll probably always be a shill because like, I'm never
Speaker 3: gonna spew Nazi rhetoric, so that just makes me a shill, then.
Speaker 2: I Well, and it's because he's actually calling out the
Speaker 2: real globalists who will who he deems as the globalist,
Speaker 2: which you know, it's one of three organizations we're going
Speaker 2: to get into the one today, which is the Trilateral
Speaker 2: organ Uh what is the funck?
Speaker 1: Is it called Trilateral Commission Commission? Yeah?
Speaker 2: Right, And and it's all dude, it's all synced up.
Speaker 2: This is globalism, this is elitism. So yes, you can
Speaker 2: look at the the middle men Jews who are running
Speaker 2: shit right, Like, I think that that's probably all they
Speaker 2: really are. Whenever people break down the Jew stuff, I
Speaker 2: think that's middle management and those people are just really
Speaker 2: good at, you know, managing money and stuff like that.
Speaker 2: And yes, is there are there people who have dual
Speaker 2: citizenship to Israel. Yes, of course We've touched on that,
Speaker 2: and I'm not diminishing that. But a level above that
Speaker 2: is these these these commissions, these people who are faceless,
Speaker 2: the names that you never hear about. We're getting into
Speaker 2: that today. We always talk about these people, but we
Speaker 2: never really go into a deep episode on it.
Speaker 1: I've said it before.
Speaker 3: The only reason why we even know the name Rothschild
Speaker 3: is because they've allowed us to know it. They're not
Speaker 3: the actual puppet master. The Rothschild family is what they are.
Speaker 3: As far as the global banking conglomerate, that is a thing.
Speaker 3: But they have to answer to somebody, Okay, Like that's
Speaker 3: the fact of it. David Rothschild has to say yes, sir,
Speaker 3: to some faceless entity.
Speaker 1: That's what we're talking about today. If I'm not mistaken,
Speaker 1: well we're gonna.
Speaker 2: Be talking about David Rockefeller, not David Rothschild.
Speaker 1: So I'm talking about Rothschilds for the banking because the
Speaker 1: Jews and the Jews control of the banking. We're talking
Speaker 1: about the Rothschilds, right, That's what that's all about. But
Speaker 1: it's like, if they were the real puppet master, we
Speaker 1: wouldn't know who they were. We wouldn't know that family name.
Speaker 1: You see what I'm saying.
Speaker 3: The fact that we know that name means that they
Speaker 3: are not the actual top of the level.
Speaker 2: Well you know, And we are going to be getting
Speaker 2: into the Rockefellers a little bit here today, specifically David Rockefeller,
Speaker 2: who is one of two or three people that founded
Speaker 2: the Trilateral Commission. This was back in nineteen seventy three,
Speaker 2: right around, like Jimmy Carter and people like that, we're
Speaker 2: also involved in it. We're going to get really deep
Speaker 2: in on it and really understand who is pulling the strings.
Speaker 2: And does it matter that we vote left or right?
Speaker 2: Does it matter if we're red or if we're blue.
Speaker 2: Does it matter Trump or Kamala Trump or Hillary Trump
Speaker 2: or Biden, you know, Bush or carry What does it
Speaker 2: really matter? And who are these who are all these
Speaker 2: people really controlled by? And these are the special interest
Speaker 2: groups that you always hear about you know, these are
Speaker 2: the people that are working behind closed doors. But before
Speaker 2: we get in there, I do have an announcement. It's
Speaker 2: probably going to upset some people. Okay, let me just
Speaker 2: go ahead.
Speaker 1: You cut your fucking hair, dude, I did so, that's
Speaker 1: why you're rocking the bandana by well.
Speaker 2: I always like the rock a Bond bandana, but I
Speaker 2: just felt like, you know, it was it was more
Speaker 2: of a you know, a little surprise tactic for this episode.
Speaker 3: And you trimmed your beard again as we literally just
Speaker 3: talked about no shape November being in effect.
Speaker 2: No, no, I haven't shaved since then. Really, yeah, my beard.
Speaker 2: Hair doesn't grow very fast, dude, like this little patchy shit.
Speaker 2: This will it'll be like this for a month, do.
Speaker 1: You, brother, I don't know. I don't know what you're
Speaker 1: gonna decide on as far as how to frame your face.
Speaker 2: Well, to be honest, as far as the long hair goes,
Speaker 2: I've grown it out a few times. I've really enjoyed it.
Speaker 2: I kind of got that out of my system. And
Speaker 2: to be honest, dude, going to sleep at night was
Speaker 2: kind of a hassle with the long hair going in
Speaker 2: the shower washing it and conditioning it and then drying
Speaker 2: it and then putting it up in a bun or
Speaker 2: you know what I mean. It's like it's a it's
Speaker 2: a fucking chore, you know what I mean, having long hair.
Speaker 2: So I was like, who am I trying to fucking
Speaker 2: impress anymore?
Speaker 1: Dude?
Speaker 2: You know that's the way I look at it.
Speaker 1: It is a hassle these this hair really is.
Speaker 3: Whenever I lay down to you, I throw my hair
Speaker 3: up and then lay down on the pillows.
Speaker 2: That's what I was doing like that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And I mean it works. I'll wake up and
Speaker 1: it's a whole fucking rat's nest. But that's just the
Speaker 1: name of the game. That's the way it be.
Speaker 2: And so I decided I went over to U sport
Speaker 2: clips yesterday and there was like this Mexican lady who
Speaker 2: was cutting my hair and she goes, oh, ideals need
Speaker 2: this hair. It's so beautiful and golden. And she goes,
Speaker 2: what are you doing with it today? And I was like,
Speaker 2: I'm chopping at the fuck off. And she was like, oh, no,
Speaker 2: it's not ten inches yet, you can't donate it. And
Speaker 2: I said, I don't care. Get it off of me.
Speaker 2: I need it off of me right now. And yeah
Speaker 2: she was a little upset, but uh yeah, I mean whatever.
Speaker 2: I feel a lot more free now. So there's that.
Speaker 2: So I'm sorry. Yes I did get rid of my antenna,
Speaker 2: but the antenna is built in now. That's the way
Speaker 2: I look at it.
Speaker 1: You your shit, I do. I do think I'm gonna donate.
Speaker 3: I think I'm gonna let my hair go to like
Speaker 3: the middle of my back, maybe a little bit longer now,
Speaker 3: I'm gonna donate to Locks of Love and then do
Speaker 3: it again.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 2: I ain't decided, you know, the I just I thought.
Speaker 2: I was like, dude, it's just time. It's just time.
Speaker 2: That's the way I was looking at it. But you
Speaker 2: asked what really inspired this episode. It was a good
Speaker 2: cold man. But it was also a couple of videos.
Speaker 2: And you may have seen this video. A lot of
Speaker 2: people call him the homeless man. He's actually not a
Speaker 2: homeless man. He was actually at a at a Renfair Rena.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, this guy, I remember him. But real quick
Speaker 3: before we press play on that. For all the good
Speaker 3: cult members who would like to see what is going
Speaker 3: on rather than just hear it, Jonathan, tell them where
Speaker 3: they can go.
Speaker 2: You can go to patreon dot com slash Cultive Conspiracy
Speaker 2: Podcast or rockfan dot com slash Cult of Conspiracy, both
Speaker 2: of those links and down the show notes below. If
Speaker 2: you do subscribe over there at Patreon, then what you'll
Speaker 2: have access to is getting the shows a couple of
Speaker 2: days in advance. You will have completely commercial less shows
Speaker 2: the entire way, no interruption whatsoever. For all those people
Speaker 2: that are that may be complaining about commercials, trust me,
Speaker 2: I get it, but you know that's that's just the
Speaker 2: way it is. And and also you could be one
Speaker 2: of the cult members that joins us every Tuesday night
Speaker 2: if you sign up for the Third Eye all the
Speaker 2: way Open tier, and you'll be able to join us
Speaker 2: live Tuesday nights at nine pm Central Time to really
Speaker 2: go into whatever y'all want to ask. You can ask
Speaker 2: us literally anything. And if y'all have listened to those episodes,
Speaker 2: you know that we're really kind of all over the board.
Speaker 2: It's a conspiracy schmorgasboard, if you will, And it's always
Speaker 2: a great time, and so we would love to see
Speaker 2: your faces, we would love to hear your questions, and really,
Speaker 2: if nothing else, we just want to hang out with you.
Speaker 2: So that's really the best place to be able to
Speaker 2: do it, and we appreciate all the good cult members
Speaker 2: who have already.
Speaker 1: Indeed, indeed, now this video, like you said, it's went
Speaker 1: pretty viral a couple of years back, especially for people
Speaker 1: who are in the truth or community. But it's been
Speaker 1: a while since I heard it.
Speaker 3: I remember your boy was on one and had a
Speaker 3: lot of philosophical insights, a little bit of some wisdom,
Speaker 3: whether you agree or disagree with it. I remember he
Speaker 3: was really on one this day, so I'm interested to
Speaker 3: rewatch it myself.
Speaker 2: Dude, it is so good. It's so good, all right,
Speaker 2: but it's only fifty nine seconds, but you'll get a
Speaker 2: little taste about what he's talking about.
Speaker 4: Here.
Speaker 2: Let's see what he's got.
Speaker 5: You understand politics, you think you understand political parties?
Speaker 2: Drop on the craft.
Speaker 6: You don't know what the illuminati is.
Speaker 1: If you're Republican or your Democrat.
Speaker 6: You're an?
Speaker 2: Why is this easy?
Speaker 1: It's called divide at Carker.
Speaker 7: That's why there's two parties.
Speaker 5: And only two and the control by the same people
Speaker 5: at the very top to belong to the councilor formulations.
Speaker 5: The Builder Burger Group they also belong to the Trilateral Commission.
Speaker 1: And you people don't even know what that hell that is.
Speaker 5: But if you do, though, you even know that these
Speaker 5: are the people that control your world by making global
Speaker 5: policies that you never vote on, and by wit the
Speaker 5: parties both served and belong to these organizations that control
Speaker 5: your world. Now here's how it works, really easy. By
Speaker 5: the contract can only.
Speaker 1: Work that the people that are devoted are not aware of.
Speaker 5: The falsely created divisions. If you're not aware of it,
Speaker 5: then it works.
Speaker 2: If you know about it, then it don't work no more.
Speaker 5: If you have socialism without capitalism, it becomes communism if
Speaker 5: you have right.
Speaker 2: So he just goes and goes and goes. I figured,
Speaker 2: you know, a minute is pretty you know, it's a
Speaker 2: it's a good starting point for this, for this episode.
Speaker 2: And so why don't we start at the very beginning? Okay?
Speaker 2: And should I play that other video? Mm mmmmm let
Speaker 2: me see me.
Speaker 1: He does it play in better at a later section, or.
Speaker 2: Uh, well, yeah, I'm gonna play the video. Okay, you
Speaker 2: ready for this one? If you if you're in the
Speaker 2: conspiracy realm, you've surely seen this video. This is dating
Speaker 2: back from a from an episode of Barney Barney Miller,
Speaker 2: and he is like, quote unquote the crazy conspiracy theorist
Speaker 2: in talking about the Trilateral Commission. Let's see what he's got.
Speaker 8: They're the ones who should be arresting, not.
Speaker 1: Me that before.
Speaker 9: We got here, Cam.
Speaker 10: This is William Klein who was wreckon on off.
Speaker 8: So I just wanted to meet them face to face.
Speaker 8: I wanted them to admit what they were doing.
Speaker 11: Who is they?
Speaker 10: He was in the officer the Trilateral Commission.
Speaker 2: Trilateral Commission.
Speaker 10: Yeah, the Trilateral Commission. All right, what is the Trilateral Commission.
Speaker 10: It's an organization founded in nineteen seventy three by David
Speaker 10: Rockefeller to bring together business and political leaders from the
Speaker 10: United States, Europe, Japan so they could work together for
Speaker 10: better economic and political cooperation between the nations.
Speaker 8: With that, that's what they'd like us to believe.
Speaker 2: But you see, what they're.
Speaker 8: Really up to is a scheme to plant.
Speaker 12: Their own loyal members in positions of power in this country,
Speaker 12: to work to erase national boundaries and create an international
Speaker 12: community and in time bring about a.
Speaker 6: One world government.
Speaker 12: With David Rockefeller calling the shop.
Speaker 1: I take it there, pressing charges.
Speaker 8: Yeah, well he broke a globe and and some units
Speaker 8: of artwork.
Speaker 2: They're in on it too.
Speaker 8: Okay, mister Klein, I'm just telling you our whole way
Speaker 8: of life as we know it's in jeopardy. I appreciate
Speaker 8: that information I have. I have the documented evidence. It's
Speaker 8: all in there. Show him.
Speaker 4: Oh he's got.
Speaker 10: That's magazine here, Conspiracy Review, Suppressed Truth Round Up.
Speaker 2: Oh mister plan is exposed.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well you're.
Speaker 8: Still not convinced. Would you like to hear the names
Speaker 8: of just a few of the people who have been
Speaker 8: on the Trilateral Commission?
Speaker 2: Not particularly James R.
Speaker 8: Ocarter heard of him? Look, mister Klein, Henry Kissinger, you
Speaker 8: hear to him?
Speaker 2: Walter Mondale, True.
Speaker 8: Mister Klein is John Anderson, George Bush.
Speaker 12: Now you remember at the at the convention, everybody thought
Speaker 12: it was going to be Ford per veep.
Speaker 13: You know what happened.
Speaker 12: David Rockefeller just picked up a phone, put in the call, Hey, Ronnie,
Speaker 12: forget Jerrie's George bye.
Speaker 2: No matter who won.
Speaker 12: In November, they had their men in the White House.
Speaker 10: Are you true?
Speaker 6: Yeah?
Speaker 2: All right? So that really tickled a lot of conspiracy
Speaker 2: theorists fancies because we know it's It's long been known,
Speaker 2: at least in the conspiracy world, that the term conspiracy
Speaker 2: theory was created by those in power in order to
Speaker 2: disminish the belief of the ongoing narrative that is usually
Speaker 2: accepted by the majority of people and people who actually
Speaker 2: have a brain to think with their own brain cells.
Speaker 2: You know, they don't want that to happen. They want
Speaker 2: you to believe in the actual narrative. So this is
Speaker 2: why we're getting into this episode by the good cult
Speaker 2: member bye, by this video, this episode of Barney Miller,
Speaker 2: and because of the quote unquote homeless man, not homeless man,
Speaker 2: he was really at a rent fair. All of that
Speaker 2: stuff really sparked the interest of this episode right here.
Speaker 2: We're going to go balls deep in on it.
Speaker 1: No doubt. And I mean that also checks out the
Speaker 1: Bush is if you want to look at long standing
Speaker 1: American royalty, if you want to classify at his especially
Speaker 1: as far as the politics goes.
Speaker 3: Yeah, George Bush Senior. Keep in mind he was the
Speaker 3: director of the CIA before he was the vice president
Speaker 3: or the nominee for the vice president.
Speaker 1: He wasn't who they were.
Speaker 3: Hoping Ford or excuse me for Ford was who they
Speaker 3: were hoping for He was the Speaker of the House
Speaker 3: that pretty much got forced into office. He's actually the
Speaker 3: only president, I'm not mistaken that was not elected to
Speaker 3: the office of potus but still served after his term
Speaker 3: cut two, they're thinking he's going to go as a
Speaker 3: run for VP behind Was it Reagan?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I believe so, Jimmy Carter?
Speaker 1: No, no, no, Carter was a Democrat, So it was
Speaker 1: Reagan Regan. I'm got killed because he.
Speaker 3: Was Reagan's VP. He ran after him and he won
Speaker 3: that one term before Clinton. So for them to be like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 3: well Rockefeller picked up the phone and put Bush in,
Speaker 3: Like that's that's absolutely like.
Speaker 1: Not a crazy statement out loud when.
Speaker 3: You really look at the Bush's corporate ties and financial
Speaker 3: ties to which organization, Like, there's more evidence to say
Speaker 3: that that crazy conspiracy guy.
Speaker 1: Was accurate than incorrect.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying so when you look back at twenty
Speaker 2: twenty and Joe Biden somehow won the nomination even though
Speaker 2: he was not very well respected at the DNC, and
Speaker 2: as a matter of fact, one of his opponents at
Speaker 2: the DNC became his vice president, who was doing nothing
Speaker 2: but talking shit on him, talking about Kamala Harris, who
Speaker 2: just lost. She's a big fat loser, but she was
Speaker 2: talking major shit on Joe Biden. Why would he pick
Speaker 2: her as vice president? Why would she be saying nothing
Speaker 2: but nice things about him the entire time? Why would
Speaker 2: they do this? Well, it's because they don't actually pick
Speaker 2: their own people. They are placed into these positions. And
Speaker 2: I believe that the people that are pulling to strings
Speaker 2: are the ones that place Kamala Harris as the VP
Speaker 2: in hopes that she would become president because she is
Speaker 2: the world's biggest mattress slash puppet and she would have
Speaker 2: been easily easy to control.
Speaker 1: I one hundred percent agree.
Speaker 3: And you know, the role of vice president is a
Speaker 3: very overlooked position, but when you really look at it,
Speaker 3: they have all of the same access as the president
Speaker 3: of the United States, but no one's asking where they're
Speaker 3: at or what they're doing. That's why when Obama was
Speaker 3: in office, Biden was able to make all these crazy
Speaker 3: Ukrainian deals in Maarizema deals and all.
Speaker 1: These things happen.
Speaker 3: When Bush was in office, Cheney with Halliburton was able
Speaker 3: to make all these crazy deals happen, and all this
Speaker 3: money and all this stuff because he had all the
Speaker 3: access to all of the information and all of the meetings,
Speaker 3: but no one was asking where he was at. Look
Speaker 3: at the same thing with Clinton, look at the same
Speaker 3: thing with Reagan. George Bush was doing these things. It's
Speaker 3: all the way through.
Speaker 2: Oh dude, the swamp is deep, as they say, And then.
Speaker 3: Cut to Mike Pince, who was so square. I don't
Speaker 3: think that he did a single business transaction. I don't
Speaker 3: even know if he's written a book, like, I don't know.
Speaker 3: Right then cut to Kamala. I don't think she did
Speaker 3: any kind of underhanded business deals. I don't think she's
Speaker 3: smart enough. I think she's just kind of been riding
Speaker 3: the vacation train.
Speaker 2: I actually believe that Trump did hand pick Mike Pence
Speaker 2: because if you think about its square, nobody like you're
Speaker 2: gonna take out Trump, and then you get this guy, like,
Speaker 2: first of all, nobody wants to go back to where
Speaker 2: you know, religion was fueling the world and governing the
Speaker 2: laws and stuff like that. And not only that, but
Speaker 2: it's like this guy was the biggest square, lame, like
Speaker 2: most boring person to ever listen talk and it's like,
Speaker 2: all right, well, I guess we would kind of prefer
Speaker 2: Trump over that. I think that was actually a pretty
Speaker 2: brilliant move on the behalf of Trump.
Speaker 1: I think it was a conspiracy in and of itself.
Speaker 1: Let me let me go down this for two seconds
Speaker 1: real quick.
Speaker 3: I think because Mike Pence was so square and so
Speaker 3: straight laced, that's literally why they picked him for Trump.
Speaker 3: I think that was more of what happened, rather than
Speaker 3: Trump himself hand picking him. I think that kind of
Speaker 3: is a gray area reason being. Trump is that guy
Speaker 3: that stirs the pot and he's fucking wheeling and dealing
Speaker 3: and he's stirring it up. He's blending shit up. Man,
Speaker 3: motion's happening. Movement's happening. If something was to happen where
Speaker 3: he is no longer in office, while the blender's still
Speaker 3: fucking going.
Speaker 1: Yo, we need a dude who ain't doing shit. We
Speaker 1: need a dude.
Speaker 3: Who's gonna press the hard pause button and just keep
Speaker 3: that bitch paused until the next election cycle.
Speaker 1: And that's what Pence was. He was that boring guy
Speaker 1: that he ain't making no moves. He ain't. He ain't
Speaker 1: trying to show no balls or backbone. He ain't. He
Speaker 1: ain't trying to flex on nobody.
Speaker 3: He's like the dad, this is hold the fuck on, now,
Speaker 3: let's just.
Speaker 2: Call him down and talk about it.
Speaker 1: That would have been pins.
Speaker 3: I think they quote unquote selected pins for Trump.
Speaker 2: It's very possible, but I guess you could really make
Speaker 2: an argument either way, to be honest with you, And
Speaker 2: I don't know if we're ever really gonna know, but
Speaker 2: maybe we will find something out within this Trilateral Commission,
Speaker 2: because while we're looking at the Trilateral Commission, we're gonna
Speaker 2: be looking at a long list of people who have
Speaker 2: served and who are currently serving, and also the people
Speaker 2: that served in prior administrations. So this is going to
Speaker 2: be very interesting and we're gonna find out all right,
Speaker 2: does the Trilateral Commission mainly support does it support left
Speaker 2: and right? Does it mainly support left? Does it mainly
Speaker 2: support right? Which way are they really leaning towards nowadays?
Speaker 2: And the conspiracy theorist with the third eye all the
Speaker 2: way open, I think that you know what not don't
Speaker 2: let me spoil it. Don't let me spoil it. We're
Speaker 2: gonna get to who is being controlled by these people
Speaker 2: and where should we draw the lines in the sand?
Speaker 1: I love it. Let's go.
Speaker 2: So first off, we got to go over to wicked
Speaker 2: Pedia and see what their explanation of the Trilateral Commission is, because,
Speaker 2: like you just heard, they they that that guy was
Speaker 2: just over there talking about they're controling the world and
Speaker 2: stuff like that. Meanwhile the regular person is like, Trilateral Commission, dude,
Speaker 2: that's that's you don't even got to worry about. That's
Speaker 2: no big deal. Don't even think about it. Yes, it
Speaker 2: was started back in nineteen seventy three by David Rockefeller,
Speaker 2: who we know is a known globalist, and we know
Speaker 2: that this guy is all the way out to really
Speaker 2: control the entire world. But yet, don't don't look over there.
Speaker 2: Just look at you know, look at how great are
Speaker 2: our country is, look at how great the world is.
Speaker 2: And Trilateral Commission can coig this within that. It's basically
Speaker 2: you know what they were trying to say. And so
Speaker 2: let's see Wikipedia's explanation of the Trilateral Commission. It says
Speaker 2: the Trilateral Commission is a non governmental international organization aimed
Speaker 2: at fostering closer cooperation between Japan, Western Europe, and North America.
Speaker 2: It was founded in July of nineteen seventy three, principally
Speaker 2: by American banker in philanthropist David Rockefeller, an internationalist who
Speaker 2: sought to address the challenges posed by the growing economic
Speaker 2: and political interdependence between the United States and its allies
Speaker 2: in North America, Western Europe, and Japan. The leadership of
Speaker 2: the organization has since focused on returning quote unquote to
Speaker 2: our roots as a group of countries sharing common values
Speaker 2: and a commitment to the rule of law, open economies
Speaker 2: and societies, and democratic peoples. So it sounds nice on
Speaker 2: the surface, patriot acs on a grain on the service.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: Oh, that sounded like just straight up taking your freedom
Speaker 3: on the surface, but like it was seen as for
Speaker 3: the greater good this and what year was this.
Speaker 1: One more time?
Speaker 2: Nineteen seventy three, Okay, So that's.
Speaker 3: I'm trying to And again it's been a hot minute
Speaker 3: since I looked into the Trilateral Commission. So looking at
Speaker 3: this fish out of water here, Japan, Western Europe, and
Speaker 3: North America. So Western Europe would be all of our
Speaker 3: allies in Europe, the NATO countries, if you want to
Speaker 3: get technical, then Japan. I mean they're a homie as
Speaker 3: far as trade is concerned. Pretty much directly after World
Speaker 3: War Two, we tried to make them as tight of
Speaker 3: homies as we could.
Speaker 1: And then North America. Okay.
Speaker 3: And this is for the over top principle of economic
Speaker 3: growth and strengthening all of us. Okay, it sounds on
Speaker 3: the surface relatively positive.
Speaker 2: The commitment to the rule of law, open economies and societies,
Speaker 2: and democratic principles. Okay, just remember that, okay. Til Commission
Speaker 2: is headed by an executive committee in three regional chairs
Speaker 2: representing Europe, North America, and Asia Pacific region, with headquarters
Speaker 2: in Paris, Washington, d C. And Tokyo, respectively. Meetings are
Speaker 2: held annually at locations that rotate among the three regions.
Speaker 2: Regional and national meetings are held throughout the year. Most
Speaker 2: gatherings focus on discussing reports and debating strategy to meet
Speaker 2: the Commission's aims. The Trilateral Commission represents influential commercial and
Speaker 2: political interest. As of twenty twenty one, there were roughly
Speaker 2: four hundred members, including leading figures in politics, business, media,
Speaker 2: and academia. Each country within the three regions is assigned
Speaker 2: a quota of members reflecting its relative political and economic strength.
Speaker 2: All right, so we kind of got the gist of it,
Speaker 2: Wikipedia style. As far as the members the contributing countries.
Speaker 2: The goals here, as far as you know, bringing everybody
Speaker 2: together and working together to better establish laws and economy
Speaker 2: and stuff like that. Surface level, shit, surface level. But
Speaker 2: the founding, it says, the Trilateral Commission was formed in
Speaker 2: nineteen seventy three by private citizens of Japan, North American
Speaker 2: nations including the US and Canada, and Western European nations
Speaker 2: to foster substantive political and economic dialogue across the world.
Speaker 2: The idea of the Commission was developed in the early
Speaker 2: nineteen seventies, a time of considerable discord among the United
Speaker 2: States and its allies in Western Europe, Japan, and Canada.
Speaker 2: To quote its founding declaration, growing growing interdependence is a
Speaker 2: fact of life of the contemporary world. It transcends and
Speaker 2: influences national systems. While it's important to develop greater cooperation
Speaker 2: among all the countries of the world, Japan, Western Europe,
Speaker 2: and North America, in view of their great weight in
Speaker 2: the world economy and their massive relations relations with one another,
Speaker 2: bear a special responsibility for developing effective cooperation both in
Speaker 2: their own interests in those of the rest of the world.
Speaker 2: Pretty strong declaration there, but it goes on it says,
Speaker 2: to be effective in meeting common problems, Japan, Western Europe,
Speaker 2: and North America will have to consult and cooperate more
Speaker 2: closely on the basis of equality, to develop and carry
Speaker 2: out coordinated policies on matters affecting their common interest, Refrain
Speaker 2: from unilateral actions incompatible with their interdependence, and from actions
Speaker 2: detrimental to other regions, and take advantage of existing international
Speaker 2: and regional organizations and further enhance their role.
Speaker 3: Okay, So basically they're saying that we need to get
Speaker 3: all of us in lockstep in certain regards.
Speaker 2: Ll take advantage of existing international and regional organizations first off,
Speaker 2: and then further enhance their role. Yeah, that's interesting that
Speaker 2: you want to enhance the role of existing international and
Speaker 2: regional organizations. I don't know, just thrown it out there.
Speaker 3: As far as again surface level, what the what the
Speaker 3: quote unquote official narrative of that would be is, Uh,
Speaker 3: let's say you have local industry in your country and
Speaker 3: you would like for that to go a little more global.
Speaker 3: You want to take it to the next level. They're
Speaker 3: saying that the local resources, they want to enhance them
Speaker 3: and help them grow and help them advance or at
Speaker 3: least that's what it seems like on the surface, because
Speaker 3: if it it kind of like the rising tide raises
Speaker 3: all ships again very much. It sounds positive, all right,
Speaker 3: It sounds on the surface like it's a good thing.
Speaker 3: But that also is a door that swings both ways,
Speaker 3: because if there's just some other regional faction of local
Speaker 3: I don't know, I don't want to use the term
Speaker 3: like militia or rebel fighters or whatever, because like that
Speaker 3: may not be what we're talking about here, but isn't
Speaker 3: it's not?
Speaker 2: Okay, Well, the real question we should be asking ourselves is, yes,
Speaker 2: does all this stuff sound harmless on the front? Yes,
Speaker 2: it absolutely does. Like in hopes that you know, the
Speaker 2: world was a great and loving and caring place about
Speaker 2: its citizens of the world, we would hope that something
Speaker 2: like this would be created so that you know, we
Speaker 2: can kind of maintain this level of stability and you know,
Speaker 2: economic balance moving forward and stuff like that. However, if
Speaker 2: you look at it, who is the ones that is
Speaker 2: deeming certain things good and certain things bad? Now I
Speaker 2: know that you know logical explanation here, Logically we understand
Speaker 2: what is good and what is bad. But the people
Speaker 2: at the top look at the world very differently. And
Speaker 2: here's an example of it. Over in Australia. They just
Speaker 2: passed a bill, the misinform the Misinformation Bill. Okay, they
Speaker 2: just sign this, and the Australians are fucking losing their
Speaker 2: minds over it. The people that know of it, they're saying,
Speaker 2: wait a second, who deems what misinformation? And who deems
Speaker 2: what hate speech? Because you know what I mean, Like,
Speaker 2: that's why you got to look at the people that
Speaker 2: are calling the shots, because it's always going to be
Speaker 2: in their favor and never in yours. Just want to
Speaker 2: throw that out there. But anyway, it says the Commission
Speaker 2: hopes to play a creative role as a channel of
Speaker 2: free exchange of opinions with other countries and regions. Further
Speaker 2: progress of the developing countries and greater improvement of East
Speaker 2: West relations will be a major concern, so it says.
Speaker 2: And I don't know how to pronounce this name, but
Speaker 2: he was one of the founding members along with Rockefeller,
Speaker 2: the big new Brazinski. Sure, I guess we can go
Speaker 2: with that. He was one of the founders along with
Speaker 2: David Rockefeller. He was a Rockefeller advisor. As a matter
Speaker 2: of Fact who is a specialist on international affairs, and
Speaker 2: later he became Jimmy Carter's National security advisor. That interesting
Speaker 2: damn he left. He was also UH with Columbia University,
Speaker 2: so smart man, but he left the Columbia University to
Speaker 2: organize along with a couple of other people here who
Speaker 2: are also you know, big names as far as Pool
Speaker 2: amongst you know, the strings of the world goes, such
Speaker 2: as former governors of Pennsylvania, the Japan Center for International Exchange,
Speaker 2: the European Policy Center, the Brookings Institution, the count the
Speaker 2: Council on Foreign Relations, and uh the United States Ambassador
Speaker 2: to Japan. Like, these are some of the people who
Speaker 2: are who are also on this board. You know, this
Speaker 2: was the founding people. This was the original group of
Speaker 2: people that got together, at least the United United States portion.
Speaker 2: So it said that in order to become part of
Speaker 2: this board, you had to be a citizen of one
Speaker 2: of these three places. So you had to be like
Speaker 2: if you were, you know, representing North America, you had
Speaker 2: to be either from Canada or America. Like you couldn't
Speaker 2: have somebody from Thailand representing America. You had to be
Speaker 2: from here and the same goes really across the board,
Speaker 2: and so as it was talking about the people, so
Speaker 2: you had people from North America, Western Europe, and Japan.
Speaker 2: So what they said is is that it's it was
Speaker 2: originally a board that was comprised of around three to
Speaker 2: four hundred people and it was divided equally amongst the
Speaker 2: three nations, right, so you'd have a third of the
Speaker 2: people from North America, a third of the people from
Speaker 2: Western Europe, and a third of the people from Japan.
Speaker 2: And so that way it was kind of balanced to
Speaker 2: achieve a goal that everybody could agree on. Yeah, sounds
Speaker 2: harmless on the front, but let's get a little bit
Speaker 2: deeper here. So first off, I wanted to bring over
Speaker 2: the Trilateral Commission website, which is just Trilateral dot org
Speaker 2: and you can really start to look at like, you know,
Speaker 2: it's it's very similar to a World Economic Forum, a
Speaker 2: builder Berg, you know these these what's the other one
Speaker 2: that I can't think of? It's basically just smart people
Speaker 2: with a lot of money, and they're trying to basically
Speaker 2: come in contact with other smart people with a lot
Speaker 2: of money to be able to change the world and
Speaker 2: be able to change certain laws and and send you
Speaker 2: know the world in a certain direction that would ultimately
Speaker 2: benefit each one of them.
Speaker 1: Right, big international think tank, right right, And you can
Speaker 1: see right here, this is old David Rockefeller back whenever
Speaker 1: he was younger.
Speaker 2: Tell me he doesn't look like George Soros. Bro a
Speaker 2: little bit that face. Wait till you see a picture
Speaker 2: of from whenever he's older. I mean, I couldn't tell
Speaker 2: the difference between David Rockefeller and George Soros.
Speaker 1: Damn dudes, that it's that bad.
Speaker 2: Oh, it's that crazy. And by the way, as a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, just yesterday or today as a time
Speaker 2: of recording, how about Jizuping President? Is he president of China?
Speaker 2: Is that what the title is?
Speaker 1: Sure?
Speaker 2: Prime Minister, President, fucking overlord, whatever you want to call him.
Speaker 2: He actually just made a statement on live TV saying
Speaker 2: that basically that George Soros is he's he's basically calling
Speaker 2: him Satan in real life. He's saying that this is
Speaker 2: the most evil man to ever walk this planet. Jesu
Speaker 2: Ping said that, and he's out, He's outlawed from ever
Speaker 2: going to China.
Speaker 1: China is not doing good right now. It's it's getting
Speaker 1: worse by the day.
Speaker 2: I'm sure it is. I'm sure it is. But uh
Speaker 2: but anyway, so you know, we kinda this is crazy.
Speaker 1: He gave shouts out to George Soros.
Speaker 2: Dude, just starting it out there, dude. And we'll go
Speaker 2: back to this Trilateral Commission page once we get a
Speaker 2: better understanding of what all is going on right here.
Speaker 2: And I'm not even saying that I'm some kind of
Speaker 2: genius as far as understanding the Trilateral Commission. I just
Speaker 2: pulled up a bunch of articles that would be able
Speaker 2: to help both of us kind of standing a little
Speaker 2: bit more in depth.
Speaker 1: No, no, I mean I find it interesting right now.
Speaker 3: Think of this in today's terms, just for shits and giggles,
Speaker 3: if Elon Musk right decided to create some sort of
Speaker 3: a international corporate political grouping think.
Speaker 1: Tank with just name seven random countries and they just
Speaker 1: decided to just strengthen all types of international relations on
Speaker 1: their own. And he brings in the ambassadors to certain
Speaker 1: countries and foreign ministers of other countries, and it's like, okay,
Speaker 1: whether you're saying this is good or bad or like
Speaker 1: what your intentions are, Like, that's fucking weird, dude, What
Speaker 1: are you doing with the politics. What's happening here.
Speaker 2: Right, right, and so in all hopes, at least from
Speaker 2: the American citizens eye, we want people who are representing America,
Speaker 2: not the globe, right, because as the it's not so
Speaker 2: supposed to be as we go, the world goes. It's
Speaker 2: supposed to be as the country goes, So do we, right,
Speaker 2: and in the interest of America, we benefit whenever America
Speaker 2: does good. That is the philosophy, the idea behind, you know,
Speaker 2: putting America first and not globalism first.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So first off, let's get over here. This is
Speaker 2: a website that, by the way, huge huge shout out
Speaker 2: again to YANDEX. Dude, I cannot represent yandex enough the
Speaker 2: yand X. I mean, I know they say it's Russian
Speaker 2: control whatever. I'm just saying it is Google before it
Speaker 2: became controlled. That's all I'm gonna say. If you miss
Speaker 2: the old Google, if you miss old YouTube yand X
Speaker 2: just telling you download it, you'll you'll not be You'll
Speaker 2: you will not be uh dissatisfied with your decision to
Speaker 2: download that fucking app.
Speaker 1: Dude.
Speaker 2: It's crazy, all right, but anyhow so so because it
Speaker 2: brings up exactly what you're searching for. It's it's not
Speaker 2: going through a filter. And I just love that personally,
Speaker 2: not saying that I'm you know, pro Russia against Russia.
Speaker 2: I'm not. I'm not going there. I'm just talking about
Speaker 2: for the benefit of the show. And as far as
Speaker 2: information searching goes, dudey index is where it's at.
Speaker 1: Heard that.
Speaker 2: So this website is called thrillist dot com and they
Speaker 2: get into the six secret societies presidents have belonged to. Okay,
Speaker 2: they go in and they say, we love stories about
Speaker 2: secret societies. Just look at the da Vinci code that
Speaker 2: said most of the most of these tales are bullshit.
Speaker 2: Just look at the da Vinci Code. Like how they
Speaker 2: reference that the only people who truly believe that a
Speaker 2: cabal of elite individuals gathering together to control world events
Speaker 2: are usually shouting these beliefs at you while you anxiously
Speaker 2: peer down the track hoping for some sign of a
Speaker 2: subway trained to rescue you. Well, maybe you should pay
Speaker 2: a little more attention to that guy. He may be
Speaker 2: off the mark when he claims that lizard people secretly
Speaker 2: run the planet. I wouldn't even say it's it's technically
Speaker 2: off the mark on that personally, but He's not wrong
Speaker 2: when he says that secret societies do exist. In fact,
Speaker 2: many of the many of our most famous presidents have
Speaker 2: belonged to them. Take a look at these examples and
Speaker 2: try not to picture the smoking man from the X
Speaker 2: Files sitting in the background somewhere. Maybe there is a
Speaker 2: new world order here we go. I love the conspiracies
Speaker 2: are you know, through time and all the different conspiracy
Speaker 2: podcasts and channels, and you know, everybody's talking about it
Speaker 2: more and people are looking more into it, And I
Speaker 2: just love to be a part of of this Truther
Speaker 2: or you know, Third Eye all the way open movement,
Speaker 2: because it really is we're not talking to, you know,
Speaker 2: just the crazy nut jobs who smoked you know, a
Speaker 2: couple of bowls of crack anymore. Like that's that's of
Speaker 2: you know, the twenty the you know, beginning of the
Speaker 2: two thousand, in the nineties and shit like that. The
Speaker 2: normal thinking person doesn't look at a conspiracy theory and
Speaker 2: claims it to be a conspiracy theory, you know what
Speaker 2: I mean.
Speaker 3: No, not anymore, not in today's world, Not when Trump
Speaker 3: got shot in the head, not when elections have been
Speaker 3: clearly stolen, Not when we're sending billions of dollars to Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Not like no, no, no, no.
Speaker 3: No, like all, not when Epstein Island is real, not
Speaker 3: when p Diddy is real, not when like dude the
Speaker 3: bullshit guy on the subway with the sign saying the
Speaker 3: end is nigh, nah Son. People are listening now, people
Speaker 3: are opening their eyes, and I gotta be.
Speaker 1: Honest with you, dude, this is the best.
Speaker 2: Job I've ever had in my life and doesn't even
Speaker 2: come close. There's no other job that comes close.
Speaker 3: The only reason is because of all of you find
Speaker 3: cult members. Just gonna throw that out all of you
Speaker 3: listening to us right now. Seriously, we do this for y'all.
Speaker 3: We couldn't do what we do without y'all. Love you,
Speaker 3: Thank you, Thank you for your support and your love.
Speaker 2: Thank you for allowing us to have this life, to
Speaker 2: be able to provide conspiracies literally on the daily.
Speaker 1: This is the dream.
Speaker 3: Job, this is the passion project that has become almost
Speaker 3: a full on obsession. But they also say that if
Speaker 3: you love what you do, you never work a day
Speaker 3: in your life.
Speaker 1: And I think, for the first time I actually can
Speaker 1: say that I know what that means. It's pretty fucking insane.
Speaker 2: It's a beautiful thing. It's a beautiful thing. So thank you,
Speaker 2: good cult members. But all right, let's get into the
Speaker 2: first one that they list here as far as secret
Speaker 2: societies of certain presidents who have who have been involved
Speaker 2: in these kind of groupings. The first one they mentioned
Speaker 2: is the Trilateral Commission, and notable presidents are George H. W. Bush, which, yeah,
Speaker 2: you know, we're not really huge fans of him, Jimmy Carter,
Speaker 2: and also Billiam Clinton.
Speaker 3: Oh billion himself. So we got the right and the
Speaker 3: left representing in here.
Speaker 2: Yes, sir. So it goes into it. It says starting
Speaker 2: in nineteen seventy three, members of the Trilateral Commission, founded
Speaker 2: by David Rockefeller, have met bi annually to encourage overall
Speaker 2: cooperation between all countries. Participants from Japan, America, and Western
Speaker 2: European nations convene to tackle the major issues facing the
Speaker 2: planet and decide how to best approach them. Also, if
Speaker 2: some are to be believed, the Trilateral Commission is the
Speaker 2: secret power behind nine to eleven look at.
Speaker 1: The Treasury Department, right, that makes sense. The World Trade
Speaker 1: Center is a economic trading hub of the world. It's
Speaker 1: in New York. The entire world felt it. It kickstart
Speaker 1: a twenty two year long war.
Speaker 2: Okay, okay, and it says granted, not many take that
Speaker 2: theory seriously. We do, but relatively but relatively mainstream critics
Speaker 2: like Barry Goldwater and Noam Chomsky. I think his name
Speaker 2: is Noam Noam no m or no Chompsky Chomsky.
Speaker 1: That's actually a pretty cool name, old Chomsky.
Speaker 2: Chomsky. Yes. So Barry Goldwater and Noam Chomsky have expressed
Speaker 2: the belief that the group's purposes are not as utopian
Speaker 2: as they'd like us to believe. The thing that scares
Speaker 2: us most is the fact that Barry Goldwater and Noam
Speaker 2: Chomsky agreed about something so pretty interesting that they reference
Speaker 2: like that. And to be honest, I've heard of these names,
Speaker 2: but I didn't exactly know what they represent. And so
Speaker 2: I figured, why don't we look at some of the
Speaker 2: some of the quotes that these gentlemen have regarded as
Speaker 2: far as the Trilateral Commission goes, Because if these are
Speaker 2: people that are saying, yo, you need to look a
Speaker 2: little bit deeper into it, and they're very known journalists
Speaker 2: and things like that, maybe we should check them out.
Speaker 2: So this rate here is Noam Chomsky about the philosophy
Speaker 2: of the Trilateral Commission. Okay, okay, so this is the
Speaker 2: first one outside of Barry Goldwater. We'll get to Barry
Speaker 2: Goldwater here in a couple of minutes. But check this out.
Speaker 2: Whenever he's going deep, he's speaking, I believe like a
Speaker 2: college campus.
Speaker 1: I say, is my boy ski about to fucking cook?
Speaker 2: Dog dude about to cook? How to cook?
Speaker 14: Check it out your study of the Trilateral Commission thirty
Speaker 14: years ago that brought together a liberal internationalist intellectual elites
Speaker 14: from the three major centers of industrial democracy, Europe, United's,
Speaker 14: North America and Japan. Just to illustrate the complexion, the
Speaker 14: Carter administration a couple of years later was drawn almost
Speaker 14: completely from their ranks. Like others at the time, the
Speaker 14: Trilateral intellectuals and academics were deeply concerned by the ferment
Speaker 14: of the nineteen sixties, particularly by what they call the
Speaker 14: excess of democracy that began to appear and then nineteen
Speaker 14: sixties as normally passive and apathetic populations sought to enter
Speaker 14: the political arena to press their demands. Well, you know,
Speaker 14: naive people might think of that as democracy, but the
Speaker 14: sophisticated understand that it undermines democracy as they preferred interpret it,
Speaker 14: and therefore the Trilateral intellectuals.
Speaker 1: Urged what they.
Speaker 14: Called more moderation in democracy, perhaps even a return to
Speaker 14: the days when Truman had been able to govern the
Speaker 14: country with the cooperation of a relatively small number of
Speaker 14: Wall Street lawyers and bankers. That's the American raperteur distinguished
Speaker 14: Harvard University political scientists, maybe exaggerating a little, but capturing
Speaker 14: the desired form of democracy. To reverse the excess of democracy,
Speaker 14: they advised, it will be necessary to overcome the failures
Speaker 14: of the institutions responsible for the indoctrination of the young.
Speaker 14: Their phrase, not mine. The institutions responsible for the indoctrination
Speaker 14: of the young are churches and others, but primarily schools
Speaker 14: and universities, which are not carrying out their proper task
Speaker 14: of indoctrinating the young. And we're permitting too many departures
Speaker 14: from orthodoxy and obedience. And that's part of the problem
Speaker 14: that underlies the excess of democracy. When people were trying
Speaker 14: to enter the political arena where they don't belong. The
Speaker 14: Trilateral intellectuals and academics, and remember this is kind of
Speaker 14: the liberal internationalist and not the harsh, reactionary end of
Speaker 14: the spectrum. They were drawing from a distinguished tradition of
Speaker 14: liberal thought, not from its early origins, but as it
Speaker 14: developed in the twentieth century. In particular, they were drawing
Speaker 14: from Wilsonian progressivism. Woodrow Wilson's own view was that an
Speaker 14: elite of gentlemen with elevated ideals should govern in order
Speaker 14: to sustain stability and righteousness. That principle actually goes back
Speaker 14: to the origins of the US constitutional order. It was
Speaker 14: discussed most lucidly by the main framer of the Constitution,
Speaker 14: James Madison Newsbury, significant figure in intellectual history and political history.
Speaker 1: This was.
Speaker 14: Not in the Federalist papers which people read, but you
Speaker 14: should remember that these were propaganda documents. They don't really
Speaker 14: tell you what They were intended to convince reluctant public
Speaker 14: to accept the constitutional system, so they have to treat
Speaker 14: them a little caution. The more interesting discussion is in
Speaker 14: the debates in the Constitutional Convention, where people talked straight
Speaker 14: and we have detailed notes of them. Fortunately far I'm
Speaker 14: aware they haven't been published since about eighteen thirty, but
Speaker 14: they do exist in a proper research library. Madison. In
Speaker 14: these debates, he addressed a classic problem of political theory
Speaker 14: actually was raised by Aristotle in the first major work
Speaker 14: of political theory, his Politics who Aristotle posed a problem.
Speaker 14: They said, if wealth is highly concentrated and there's equality
Speaker 14: of vote, then the poor majority will use their voting
Speaker 14: power to carry out redistributive measures, such as what nowadays
Speaker 14: we call agrarian reform, and that would be unfair. Aristotle's
Speaker 14: solution to this was to try to reduce inequality by
Speaker 14: what we would nowadays call social democratic measures, which he
Speaker 14: described in some detail, so to try to reduce inequality
Speaker 14: and then allow democracy to flourish. Madison described the same problem,
Speaker 14: but he advised the opposite, reduce democracy and maintain inequality.
Speaker 14: So power, he argued, must be reserved to what he
Speaker 14: called the wealth of the nation, the more capable set
Speaker 14: of men who recognize that it's the responsibility of government
Speaker 14: to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority.
Speaker 14: The rest should be somehow marginalized and fragmented in various
Speaker 14: ways that he described and which have been developed in
Speaker 14: very interesting ways over time.
Speaker 2: Okay, so I wanted to let that play out because
Speaker 2: he was basically saying that these power structures are essentially
Speaker 2: in order and in line to basically siphon most of
Speaker 2: the world's money up to the very top. And a
Speaker 2: very good example of this, so back in uh, back
Speaker 2: in nineteen seventy, sixty percent of this country's wealth was
Speaker 2: in the hands of corporations, the elite, the corporate you know,
Speaker 2: like the billionaires, the high dollar rollers. Right, sixty percent
Speaker 2: of this country's wealth was there. Yeah, by the time
Speaker 2: nineteen seventy three hit and this Trilateral Commission was created,
Speaker 2: literally three years later, it went from sixty percent to
Speaker 2: eighty percent. Okay, Wow, that's how crazy it is. And
Speaker 2: you want to think about all right, well, this is
Speaker 2: just some old shit. Are they really doing it? Okay,
Speaker 2: we've talked about COVID, and we talked about the swelling
Speaker 2: of the wealth going right up to the one percent.
Speaker 2: So much so I'm going to answer this rate to
Speaker 2: hear for you since twenty twenty, from the time twenty
Speaker 2: twenty COVID happened until right now, Yeah, it is up
Speaker 2: the billionaires the billionaire's wealth. And I'm not shitting on billionaires.
Speaker 2: I don't have a problem with people making money. But
Speaker 2: if you want to talk about the money really going
Speaker 2: to the upper echelon of people out here. In the
Speaker 2: last four years, the billionaire wealth is up eighty eight
Speaker 2: percent in four years. Cool, So they already owned eighty
Speaker 2: percent and now it's up eighty eight percent over that
Speaker 2: in just four years.
Speaker 1: That's fucking insane, dude.
Speaker 2: So you really think you really think that these fucking
Speaker 2: people are really looking out for your best interest? No,
Speaker 2: they are raping you.
Speaker 3: You know, your boys, Ski was onto something there, and
Speaker 3: I'm glad that he brought it up in the way
Speaker 3: that he did. There was too much democracy, right, that
Speaker 3: was a thing that that was happening. Keep in mind
Speaker 3: sixties and seventies, bro, the Cold War was a bruin.
Speaker 3: The Vietnam War was going on. We had to stop
Speaker 3: communism from spreading. These people need some freedom.
Speaker 1: They need some democracy. Blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 3: All throughout Central and South America, all throughout Africa and.
Speaker 1: To Southeast Asia.
Speaker 3: It was a big battleground to see if democracy or
Speaker 3: communism was going to take over as the national way. Right,
Speaker 3: and then it got to a point to where too
Speaker 3: many countries had democracy and they wanted equal representation as
Speaker 3: like the old democracy right, America, Germany, France, Britain. Now
Speaker 3: all of a sudden you have like these little third
Speaker 3: world nations that now they have democracy and now they
Speaker 3: want an equal seat. And it's like whoa, whoa, hold on,
Speaker 3: now you're not you're not like coming to sitting at
Speaker 3: our table now or anything like that. So the Trilateral Commission,
Speaker 3: when you think about that, it's the industrial powerhouses Japan,
Speaker 3: North America, the America, and Canada. And they just keep
Speaker 3: naming western countries. They don't say which ones. But when
Speaker 3: you look at it, that's like the old standing powers
Speaker 3: that be and if you look at the way they
Speaker 3: is now, those are still the powers that be.
Speaker 2: It really is, dude, dude, it's it's sick. Whenever you
Speaker 2: really start following the money. That's what we always try
Speaker 2: and save all the money. And you know a lot
Speaker 2: of people like to point out Black Rock, Vanguard, Stage
Speaker 2: Street people like that, organizations like that. But there's somebody
Speaker 2: in something and some group of people that is even
Speaker 2: over them. That's the thing is that they all secretly,
Speaker 2: they all really own each other. This is why the
Speaker 2: rich get richer is because they look out for each
Speaker 2: other's backs. Because they're invested in each other and it's
Speaker 2: it's crazy. I actually watched big Shout out to your boy,
Speaker 2: Ian Carroll. My god, that guy can do insane amounts
Speaker 2: of research. One of the fucking most beautiful people to
Speaker 2: ever live. I think not.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's about getting them on the show, dude.
Speaker 2: Yah, yeah, yeah, We're definitely gonna make that happen one day.
Speaker 2: But anyway, so I bring you over to this website
Speaker 2: right here. This website is called Conspiracy archive dot com.
Speaker 2: You're not gonna get this in Google's algorithms again. Shout
Speaker 2: out to Yanex Okay, okay. So it says facts, facts
Speaker 2: and factoids. The Trilateral Commission, Gorbachev and the Europeinion. God damn,
Speaker 2: I cannot say that word. The European Union. There we go,
Speaker 2: so it says. Ever since it was established by billionaire
Speaker 2: plutocrat David Rockefeller in July of nineteen seventy three with
Speaker 2: seemingly benign aim of bringing together the business, political and
Speaker 2: academic elites of North America, Europe, and Japan, the Trilateral
Speaker 2: Commission has been the bena noir of conspiracy theorist. In
Speaker 2: their two volume study called Trilaterals over Washington. For example,
Speaker 2: scholar Anthony Sutton and his fellow researcher Patrick Wood accused
Speaker 2: the Trilateral Commission of being the current operational vehicle for
Speaker 2: a corporate socialist takeover. How about that? Hey, these ain't
Speaker 2: I mean, I'm just it's amazing that people look into
Speaker 2: this kind of stuff. That's all I'm trying to say. Like,
Speaker 2: you look at it a little bit deeper, you find
Speaker 2: out really. So anyway, they wrote that whole thing says, oh,
Speaker 2: that current operational vehicle for a corporate socialist takeover was
Speaker 2: of Washington, d C. And then it says the third
Speaker 2: attempt by the New York International Banking Fraternity to create
Speaker 2: a new world economic order under their control. These are
Speaker 2: articles that were written, it says. More recently, they've claimed
Speaker 2: that the Trilateral Commission is, in quote unquote reality, a
Speaker 2: quote unquote secretive organization slash society, and its quote unquote
Speaker 2: true goal is to create a system of world currency
Speaker 2: in world governance to achieve a new world order. Pretty interesting.
Speaker 2: So anyway, there was this author named James Perlof. He
Speaker 2: wrote a book called The Truth is a Lonely Warrior.
Speaker 2: It'd be that way title. He asserts that the Trilateral
Speaker 2: Commission is in fact a coordination tool for international hierarchy
Speaker 2: behind the New World Order plot. Pretty cool view there,
Speaker 2: but he goes such views, or they say such views,
Speaker 2: of course, largely at odds with how the Commission presents
Speaker 2: and perceives itself. In nineteen eighty, David Rockefeller sought to
Speaker 2: publicly defend the Commission from the end quote's nonsensical defamation
Speaker 2: from the quotes's extreme fringes of the left and the right.
Speaker 2: The Trilateral Commission, he declared, was no more than a
Speaker 2: group of concerned citizens interested in fostering greater understanding and
Speaker 2: cooperation amongst allies. Some forty years later on the Trilateral
Speaker 2: Commission's website, this soothing explanation was reaffirmed on the FAQ page,
Speaker 2: and they answered this by saying, the Trilateral Commission is
Speaker 2: a non governmental, policy oriented discussion group of about three
Speaker 2: hundred and ninety distinguished citizens from Europe, North America and
Speaker 2: Pacific Asia, formed to encourage understanding and closer cooperation among
Speaker 2: these three regions on aired global problems. For a middleway
Speaker 2: between these two extremes, one can only turn to a
Speaker 2: meager body of academic work which currently concludes in just
Speaker 2: three books. So they get into these three books, one
Speaker 2: of them called the Trilateralism, another one is called American
Speaker 2: Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission, and the next one the
Speaker 2: Trilateral Commission and Global Governance Informal Elite Diplomacy. So pretty
Speaker 2: cool titles. If they want to check those out.
Speaker 3: That quote from them, that motto, if you will, they're
Speaker 3: a non governmental policy group. Yeah, that kind of sounds
Speaker 3: like an oxymoron to me. I don't know, maybe I'm
Speaker 3: just crazy. That's like saying, I'm a.
Speaker 2: Well, it's not. It's not that they're it's not that
Speaker 2: they're anti government. It's just that they're they don't claim
Speaker 2: to be part of the government.
Speaker 1: But no, is that what it means, because it sounds
Speaker 1: I thought it was like, hey, we don't even do
Speaker 1: governmental shit.
Speaker 2: But we deal with policy, and it's like, bro, what right? Right?
Speaker 2: I guess you can see it as that.
Speaker 1: But maybe I'm misunderstood.
Speaker 2: But either way it goes into it says. Further understanding
Speaker 2: of the Trilateral Commission's reach and influence can be gleaned
Speaker 2: from the release of official documents. One particularly interesting case
Speaker 2: that has come to light is the Trilateral Commission's attempt
Speaker 2: to influence East and West relations in the final years
Speaker 2: of the Soviet Union. Ironically, the documents partially confirm a
Speaker 2: seemingly explosive claim made by Conspiracies theorist about the role
Speaker 2: of the Trilateral Commission in an alleged elite plot to
Speaker 2: create a European superstate. So this is where Moscow comes in.
Speaker 2: Right here, this is where Moscow comes in.
Speaker 1: So the way the superstate is that what we now
Speaker 1: call the EU.
Speaker 2: I guess you could call it that, Okay, it says
Speaker 2: a delegation to Moscow. It was while reading through David
Speaker 2: Ike's epic called I mean, eventually we are going to
Speaker 2: get David Ike on the show as well. I know
Speaker 2: a lot of good cult members have been asking to
Speaker 2: get David Ike on the show. Some people love him,
Speaker 2: some people hate him. He's kind of like a figure
Speaker 2: like Alex Jones. But he wrote a book called The
Speaker 2: Perception Deception. The writer of the article says, I came
Speaker 2: across a section where he briefly recounted the claims of
Speaker 2: a former Soviet dissident, Vladimir Bukovski, about the relationship between
Speaker 2: the Soviet Union and the European European Union. According to Ike,
Speaker 2: Bukovsky had said that years ago, in nineteen ninety two,
Speaker 2: he had seen a secret politic Bureau in Central Committee
Speaker 2: documents about the European Union which confirmed the reality of
Speaker 2: the conspiracy to turn Europe into a totalitarian state. Among
Speaker 2: the documents viewed by Bukowsky's was one which revealed a
Speaker 2: delegation from the Trilateral Commission he met with the Soviet
Speaker 2: President Gorbachev in January of eighty nine. The delegation comprised
Speaker 2: of David Rockefeller, former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger,
Speaker 2: and former French president. Oh, I can't even say that name.
Speaker 2: French guy s d Stang. That's right here, French President
Speaker 2: Valerie Giscard d'estang.
Speaker 1: Sure, that was close enough.
Speaker 2: I guess we can go with that. It was a
Speaker 2: discussion about trade issues that the French president apparently intervened
Speaker 2: to tell Gorbachev this, mister President, I cannot tell you
Speaker 2: exactly when it will happen, probably within fifteen years, but
Speaker 2: Europe is going to be a federal state, and you
Speaker 2: have to prepare yourself for that. You have to work
Speaker 2: it out with us and the European leaders, how you
Speaker 2: would react to that, how would you allow the other
Speaker 2: East European countries to interact with it, or how to
Speaker 2: become part of it. You'd have to be prepared. So
Speaker 2: then it starts, you know, it's basically talking about, you know,
Speaker 2: just forming this European Union state essentially, and gets into
Speaker 2: Gorbachev and stuff like that, when really necessarily have to
Speaker 2: get into that. And they talk about forming the federated
Speaker 2: State of Western Europe, which is pretty interesting, and then
Speaker 2: it starts talking about the the euro federalist federalist consensus.
Speaker 2: It says first, as noted on the EU referendum website,
Speaker 2: Contrary to Bukovski's claims, the push to establish a federated
Speaker 2: European Union state had long been a public aim. In fact,
Speaker 2: it had been the main drivers behind the entire European project. Bukovski, however,
Speaker 2: erroneously created the impression that a federated Europe had never
Speaker 2: been seriously suggested until it was proposed by the French
Speaker 2: president and the quote unquote left wing parties. Yet the
Speaker 2: concept of the Federated Europe or United States of Europe
Speaker 2: had been publicly advocated as far far back as nineteen
Speaker 2: twenties and nineteen thirties by such luminaries as Austrian diplomat
Speaker 2: Count Richard coudenhove Kalergi, who conceived the quote unquote Pan
Speaker 2: Europa concept the Union of Europe's nations and founded founder
Speaker 2: of the Pan Europe Europa movement, the French foreign minister
Speaker 2: at the time, who proposed a federal bond between the
Speaker 2: countries of Europe. So it's deep, dude, This is why
Speaker 2: it's it's a global kind of thing that they're really
Speaker 2: trying to get everybody on it. They're trying to turn
Speaker 2: it into a totalitarian thing where they basically turn us
Speaker 2: into you know, the test mice that buy up all
Speaker 2: their shit, that drink up all their chemicals, that soak
Speaker 2: in all their contaminated air and water and food and
Speaker 2: everything else like that, so that we maintain this this
Speaker 2: steady balance of hypnosis all throughout the day while they
Speaker 2: are just making money off our backs and doing it
Speaker 2: while we're completely unaware of it.
Speaker 1: I could see them trying to say that the EU
Speaker 1: is an attempt at making a looserver version of the
Speaker 1: United States. Right. Think about that every state in America
Speaker 1: has their own governor with their own national guard, military,
Speaker 1: with their own borders, with their own police, with their
Speaker 1: own judges, with their own laws, all the things that
Speaker 1: you need to have your own government or your own nations,
Speaker 1: so to speak. The only difference is that all of
Speaker 1: the United States speak the same language. But we also
Speaker 1: all use the same currency, right, We all use the dollar.
Speaker 1: In Europe, they all use the euro and they all
Speaker 1: speak different languages. They all have militaries, but they all
Speaker 1: throw together for international things, for if like the EU
Speaker 1: goes to war and all this. So, like I could
Speaker 1: see what they're saying. The EU was an attempt to
Speaker 1: create a looser version of the United States. That okay,
Speaker 1: fair enough, Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I would. I mean, it's it's just you know,
Speaker 2: more control. And I know that, you know, we say
Speaker 2: that a lot on the show, that there are governing
Speaker 2: puppets that you know, are controlling facets of your life
Speaker 2: that you don't even necessarily think about. But this is
Speaker 2: really the puppetiers behind it. So there was actually a
Speaker 2: guy who really tried to go against this whole trilateral
Speaker 2: Commission brotherhood, if you will. And famous guy, or at
Speaker 2: least in this category. His name was Lyndon LaRouche. And
Speaker 2: he actually just died back in twenty nineteen, but he
Speaker 2: started this movement. He started this movement, and the movement
Speaker 2: was to try and basically combat the Trilateral Commission, combat
Speaker 2: globalism from happening, and combat all these fucking super elites
Speaker 2: from you know, siphoning the people from you know, the
Speaker 2: world wealth and all that and really everything well. The
Speaker 2: Laruche Movement is a political and cultural network promoting the
Speaker 2: late Lindon LaRouche and his ideas. It has concluded many
Speaker 2: organizations and companies around the world which campaigned, gather information,
Speaker 2: and publis published books and periodicals. LaRouche aligned organizations in
Speaker 2: include the National Caucus of Labor Committees, the Schiller Institute,
Speaker 2: the Worldwide LaRouche Youth Movement, and formerly the US Labor Party.
Speaker 2: The LaRouche Movement has been called quote unquote cult like
Speaker 2: from the New York Times.
Speaker 3: So it's a socialist group, got you more like hippie
Speaker 3: commune vibes or something.
Speaker 2: Basically, we'll read a little bit more into it. I
Speaker 2: don't want to say that I have a full on understanding.
Speaker 2: Like I said, I kind of just did a little
Speaker 2: bit of research and I wanted to stumble across these
Speaker 2: all seemed like, you know, solid points to bring up
Speaker 2: in the show. It says the movement originated within the
Speaker 2: radical left student politics of the nineteen sixties. In the
Speaker 2: nineteen seventies and eighties, hundreds of candidates ran in state
Speaker 2: Democratic primaries in the United States on the LaRouche platform,
Speaker 2: while Lyndon LaRouche repeatedly campaigned for presidential nomination. From the
Speaker 2: mid seventies, the LaRouche network would adopt viewpoints and stances
Speaker 2: of the far right. During peak of the nineteen seventies
Speaker 2: and eighties, the LaRouche movement developed a private intelligence agency
Speaker 2: in contacts with foreign governments. So this guy wasn't just dude.
Speaker 2: He wasn't just no little bitch screaming from the mountaintops.
Speaker 2: He was making moves.
Speaker 3: It started with the far left extremist college campus movement
Speaker 3: of the nineteen sixties and seventies. Then it went to
Speaker 3: far right extremism in the eighties. What the hell happened here?
Speaker 1: Brot They just grew up and start having to pay
Speaker 1: bills and was like, wait a minute, taxes really suck, Like,
Speaker 1: what the fuck happened?
Speaker 2: Let's find out. In nineteen eighty eight, LaRouche and twenty
Speaker 2: five associates were convicted on fraud charges related to fundraising.
Speaker 2: The movement called the prosecutions politically motivated, however, which isn't
Speaker 2: that crazy. We've seen that stuff all over the board,
Speaker 2: especially with Trump and a bunch of people connected to him.
Speaker 2: They're trying to basically get him arrested because they don't
Speaker 2: want him going into power. And that's what this guy
Speaker 2: was saying that they were doing to him and all
Speaker 2: of his colleagues.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 2: So, Larouche's widow, her name was Helga. She heads political
Speaker 2: and cultural group groups in Germany connected with her late
Speaker 2: husband's movement. There are also parties in France, Sweden and
Speaker 2: other European countries, and branches or affiliates in Australia, Canada
Speaker 2: and the Philippines and several Latin American countries. Members engage
Speaker 2: in political organizing, fundraising, cultural events, research and writing, and
Speaker 2: internal meetings. And it says in twenty twenty one, his
Speaker 2: widow denounced the LaRouche Political Action Committee or the l
Speaker 2: PAC and its treasurer, Barbara Boyd, for going in a
Speaker 2: direction which I consider contrary to the central policies that
Speaker 2: my husband stood for. Since he passed away in twenty nineteen,
Speaker 2: Miss Boyd and her associates have embarked on a path
Speaker 2: that I believe misrepresents both my and my husband's positions,
Speaker 2: and has stated that the l PAC and Boyd do
Speaker 2: not present the Laruche movement. She has taken legal action
Speaker 2: against the LPAC to immediately cease and desist, both now
Speaker 2: and in the future, from using mister Larush's name, likeness,
Speaker 2: and potentially other confusing similar terms. So seems to be
Speaker 2: a little bit of disdainment going on within that group, right, yeah,
Speaker 2: so but check this out. We can check out exactly
Speaker 2: what was he trying to stand for, all right, because
Speaker 2: this will give us a better understanding of why he
Speaker 2: was trying to go against the Trilateral Commission. And you
Speaker 2: know what was he standing for as a result? Okay, Right,
Speaker 2: So he wanted to restore the Glass Stegel I think
Speaker 2: that's how you say it. Since two thousand and seven,
Speaker 2: the movement has actively campaigned to restore the Glass Stegel
Speaker 2: Act to separate commercial banking from speculative investment banking, protecting
Speaker 2: the former and not bailing out the ladder. So you
Speaker 2: can get behind that. You can get behind that because
Speaker 2: typically what happens is is that you know, Wall Street
Speaker 2: and big organizations and companies get bailed out, but still
Speaker 2: the people that are invested in these companies get fucked.
Speaker 2: So it's really just the corporations that are benefiting from it.
Speaker 2: And you you know, after your company did a ten
Speaker 2: to one fucking reverse split, you lose all your goddamn money, right,
Speaker 2: And this is what happens. The companies, they keep their money,
Speaker 2: you get fucked. It's a good trade off. And so
Speaker 2: that's what he was saying, is essentially that the Trilateral
Speaker 2: Commission is really only worried about the world's elites and
Speaker 2: not the little guy. That's what he was trying to
Speaker 2: go up against. Another thing, gotcha new breton Woods, It says,
Speaker 2: advocates or advocates the abandonment of floating exchange rates and
Speaker 2: the return to breton Wood style fixed rates with gold
Speaker 2: or an equivalent used under the gold reserve system. This
Speaker 2: is not to be confused with the gold standard, which
Speaker 2: laruche did not support. Oh so interesting. He didn't want
Speaker 2: to be didn't want to be a part of the
Speaker 2: gold standard, but he wanted to be a part of
Speaker 2: the gold reserve system. I guess they're a little bit
Speaker 2: different from each other.
Speaker 1: So I guess whenever it's a loan from a banking system,
Speaker 1: that loan is gold backed. But as far as the
Speaker 1: USD goes for air national trade, he wanted to keep
Speaker 1: that in place. So as far as like American loans
Speaker 1: for American people from American banks, he wanted a gold
Speaker 1: backed Okay.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you can get behind a lot of this stuff,
Speaker 2: is what he is. What I'm trying to show.
Speaker 3: It never actually heard of somebody taken that platform before.
Speaker 3: Usually people just want to swap everything to the gold standard.
Speaker 3: But like that's kind of fascinating me. And that would
Speaker 3: actually make money for the banks too, because on top
Speaker 3: of accruing interest on the loan itself, you're actually gaining
Speaker 3: interest off of the value of gold, which is going
Speaker 3: up anyway, so it's like a double win.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's no longer would our banking system be backed
Speaker 2: by debt. We would be backed by gold, which was
Speaker 2: a thing up until the sixties.
Speaker 3: But like that even makes the banks would stand to
Speaker 3: make money from that too, Like, yeah, okay, that's interesting.
Speaker 2: Another one that he stood for the American system. He
Speaker 2: goes it espouses the American system of infrastructure projects, a
Speaker 2: regulated banking system, and tariffs named for the historical American
Speaker 2: system of Henry Clay, but owing more to his ideas
Speaker 2: of the expansive American school. So I'm for that. Another
Speaker 2: thing is is the Eurasian land bridge. He wanted to
Speaker 2: implement that lectures he lectured and rode like.
Speaker 3: An actual land bridge connecting Asia to wait, what's.
Speaker 2: Let's find out? He lectured and wrote on behalf of
Speaker 2: a Eurasian land bridge, a massive high speed maglev railway
Speaker 2: project to span continents and reinvigorate industry and commerce.
Speaker 1: Oh no, I support that.
Speaker 3: Sounds like China's Belton Road initiative they've been pushing for
Speaker 3: the past few years. Like all right, they're trying to
Speaker 3: make more travel routes for better trade from continent continent.
Speaker 1: Like yeah, sounds good. I mean it would just make
Speaker 1: shit cheaper here, I mean.
Speaker 3: Essentially, it just it would open up the gates for
Speaker 3: so many other types of trade, which lowers the cost
Speaker 3: of everything else.
Speaker 1: It's it's a good plant. It's good things.
Speaker 2: Here is my favorite thing that he stood for, which
Speaker 2: was one of the main things that he was standing for.
Speaker 2: If you really think about, it's pretty crazy. But he
Speaker 2: stood for the scientific pitch. He argued in favor of
Speaker 2: what they call verdy tuning in classical music, in which
Speaker 2: A equals four to thirty two herds, as opposed to
Speaker 2: the common practice of tuning to A equals four to
Speaker 2: forty herts. Okay, so he was trying to say, we
Speaker 2: need to go back to that because the shit that
Speaker 2: we're playing on the radio is unnatural for the human
Speaker 2: to listen to.
Speaker 1: I like that, super super off into left field from
Speaker 1: the economic stuff, but like, all right, I'm not I'm
Speaker 1: not disliking it. Dope.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Uh, here's a crazy one. He wanted Mars colonization.
Speaker 2: He recommends colonization of the planet Mars on a similar
Speaker 2: basis as many others did in the field, that human
Speaker 2: survivability depends on territorial diversification.
Speaker 1: Okay, so your boy is on one on this. I
Speaker 1: like him.
Speaker 2: He does not believe the that space and planets are
Speaker 2: faking gay, so there's.
Speaker 1: Not fair most people don't, so.
Speaker 10: H.
Speaker 2: The next we get into the strategic defense initiative, he
Speaker 2: supported directed beam weapons interesting.
Speaker 1: For use, so he wanted laser beams.
Speaker 2: Dog basically but he supported the directed beam weapons for
Speaker 2: use against ICBMs and claims credit as the first to
Speaker 2: propose this. To Ronald Reagan laruche did not support rocket
Speaker 2: based defense systems such as anti ballistic missiles, So he
Speaker 2: basically wanted lasers to shoot these fucking things down and
Speaker 2: not anti ballistic missiles.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he didn't want rockets to kill rockets. He wanted
Speaker 3: laser beams to kill rockets. To be fair, Reagan legitimately
Speaker 3: tried making the space of star Wars operation star Wars.
Speaker 3: Remember that when he wanted satellites up in space with
Speaker 3: laser cannons, and the scientists had to be like, wait, bro,
Speaker 3: we don't have that.
Speaker 1: Yeah we do, I know we do. We're gonna throw
Speaker 1: a couple billion at it.
Speaker 3: Bob Like wait, no, sir, I like where your head's at,
Speaker 3: Like love the energy, but we.
Speaker 1: Don't have laser cannons. And like it was a whole conversation.
Speaker 2: Well, he probably got that idea from this guy.
Speaker 1: Probably well, now knowing this, it's like, yo, I guarantee
Speaker 1: this guy was kind of in the ear right right.
Speaker 2: Well. And another thing which relates to that, which was
Speaker 2: his belief infusion Energy Foundation says the Laruche movement proclaimed
Speaker 2: an interest in fusion energy and beam weapons. While some
Speaker 2: scientists such as John Clark praised the movement, it was
Speaker 2: generally seen as a front for Larushe's political aims. So
Speaker 2: there's that, But it says according to Fusion two members
Speaker 2: of the FEF, I don't know what that stands for.
Speaker 2: They went on to the Soviet Union to attend a
Speaker 2: conference on laser interaction in December of nineteen seventy eight.
Speaker 3: Okay, so they were big with lasers. He likes lasers
Speaker 3: and h you know, direct energy weapons. He likes science,
Speaker 3: he likes sci fi and just science technology.
Speaker 2: To be honest, look, dude, I'm not gonna sit here
Speaker 2: and say that this guy was you know, the bee's knees.
Speaker 2: But the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Speaker 1: Look, I'm gonna be honest. I don't dislike anything I've heard. Like, okay,
Speaker 1: so maybe he that'd be like saying that we today
Speaker 1: we're talking about rail guns and shit like no, no,
Speaker 1: we have that, And as far as he was given
Speaker 1: to understand, they had that, and he wanted more funding
Speaker 1: and more research done in that field. So like, again,
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not shitting on him by any means.
Speaker 2: Right, right, I mean, you know, and the reason why
Speaker 2: I even bring this guy up is because.
Speaker 1: I let's see a cult leader. What was that? What
Speaker 1: was the New York Times going on about?
Speaker 2: Well it might be because of this article here. Uh oh, okay,
Speaker 2: So you tell me if he's a cult leader or
Speaker 2: not with this ideology, and we'll find out. We're going
Speaker 2: to find out together, because I'm not gonna lie. Most
Speaker 2: of the shit that I read in this article sayms
Speaker 2: pretty logical.
Speaker 3: The stuff that I was hearing about in the beginning, Like, yeah,
Speaker 3: that might have been the quote unquote wacky stuff, but
Speaker 3: like it wasn't even that crazy. So if I don't know,
Speaker 3: but if he's got some sort of crazy cult like
Speaker 3: ideologies that he's trying to implement them, like all right,
Speaker 3: but so far I haven't heard anything.
Speaker 2: Right, So let's see what he has to say about
Speaker 2: the Trilateral Commission. And he wrote this or I don't
Speaker 2: know if he wrote it. I don't think he wrote it,
Speaker 2: but his I guess his cult members wrote it. If
Speaker 2: he has a cult heard that, but it says it's
Speaker 2: a special report to the American people. The real story
Speaker 2: behind the Trilateral Commission. Now, this thing is long, it's
Speaker 2: like thirty pages. We're not going to read all of it,
Speaker 2: but I figure we'll get into a good bit of
Speaker 2: it here. And you can see right here it says
Speaker 2: the nineteen eighties plot to destroy the nation talking about
Speaker 2: the Trilateral Commission.
Speaker 3: Yeah, issued by citizens for Larouge, March nineteen.
Speaker 2: Eighty right right, And it says this man is the
Speaker 2: Trilateral Commission's number one enemy talking about LaRouche here. And
Speaker 2: this is why because of quotes like this, He goes,
Speaker 2: the United States is not a heap of people piled
Speaker 2: on top of one one another. It is a nation
Speaker 2: with a proper moral destiny, a mission to perform among
Speaker 2: nations on behalf of civilization. Pretty solid quote. I like it,
Speaker 2: he goes. We are going to give every child in
Speaker 2: this nation a sense of moral purpose that they are producing,
Speaker 2: that they are developing their skills, that they are producing
Speaker 2: wealth which is going to out, which is going out
Speaker 2: from our ports around the world to areas where people
Speaker 2: are miss miserable and hungry and faced with death from
Speaker 2: famines and epidemics. That wealth is going to uplift the
Speaker 2: productive powers of those people. And we are going to
Speaker 2: change the world.
Speaker 3: Well basically, like how he's talking about giving our wealth
Speaker 3: to other nations, but like he's talking about America having
Speaker 3: like a moral destiny.
Speaker 1: I like that in a sense.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Basically, he was just trying to say that, like,
Speaker 2: we have the power as a people to all become wealthy,
Speaker 2: and we can use this as kind of a blueprint
Speaker 2: for the rest of the world to show them. Look,
Speaker 2: we did it in just a matter of a few years.
Speaker 2: You guys will be able to follow suit as well,
Speaker 2: as long as you know, we kind of stick to
Speaker 2: the same program.
Speaker 1: I like it. Yeah.
Speaker 2: So he made that quote back in nineteen eighty and
Speaker 2: this is, like I said, it's only thirty pages. We're
Speaker 2: not going to read the whole thing, but it says
Speaker 2: the real story behind the Trilateral Commission. It is a
Speaker 2: very interesting read, he says. As a campaign issue during
Speaker 2: this election year, the Trilateral Commission has already had a
Speaker 2: determining influence in the New Hampshire, Florida, Alabama, and Georgia primaries,
Speaker 2: and it is coming up as a crucial issue to
Speaker 2: the Illinois primary. The Commission is a group of three
Speaker 2: hundred powerful public figures from North America, Japan and Western Europe,
Speaker 2: formed in nineteen seventy three with advice and guidance from
Speaker 2: the Council on Foreign Relations and from British aristocrats such
Speaker 2: as the Earl of Cromer of Baringbros. Lord Roll of
Speaker 2: sg Warburg and Company, and Director of the Bank of England,
Speaker 2: Lord Harlock, Sir Kenneth Keith, Sir Arthur Knight, and others.
Speaker 2: One hundred and ten of the one hundred and ten
Speaker 2: members of the Commission are Americans, and twenty seven of
Speaker 2: them have served or are now serving in the Carter administration.
Speaker 2: So it's a shitload of them that we're serving in
Speaker 2: the Carter administration. Initially that's you know, really whatever it
Speaker 2: kicked off. But yeah, he goes This includes President Carter,
Speaker 2: Vice President Mondale, Secretary of State Vance, Secretary of Defense Brown,
Speaker 2: and others. So they are just getting little bullshit jobs. Dude.
Speaker 2: They're high rollers up in here, right, Yeah, David Rockefeller.
Speaker 2: Henry Kissinger's piggy bank is accorded the honor of calling
Speaker 2: himself the founder of the Commission. The candidacy of George Bush,
Speaker 2: talking about HW is now in ruins because the candidate
Speaker 2: has been overidentified with the Trilateral Commission. John B. Anderson
Speaker 2: deserves and probably will get a sound trouncing by the
Speaker 2: voters for the same reason as Bush his long standing
Speaker 2: identification with the Trilateral Commission the electorate. The electorate knows
Speaker 2: very little of substance about the Trilateral Commission, but this
Speaker 2: is compensated for the fact that it knows that President
Speaker 2: Carter was hand picked and put into office by the Commission.
Speaker 2: Therefore not without justice. The average informed American citizen identified
Speaker 2: the debacles and disasters of the Carter administration with the
Speaker 2: Trilateral Commission. They do not want any of it, and
Speaker 2: they do not want any other candidate close to or
Speaker 2: identified with the Commission. This year's general election is, on
Speaker 2: a fundamental level, fought around the issue of the Eastern
Speaker 2: Establishment's control over American policymaking institutions. Man, that's saying a
Speaker 2: lot right there, dude.
Speaker 1: It is indeed, it is indeed. But I mean, okay,
Speaker 1: let's keep reading. Let's keep reading.
Speaker 2: Find out more. He goes, this is true even for
Speaker 2: the Democratic Party's primaries so far. The principal reason why
Speaker 2: ordinary Democrats continue to vote for Carter despite his identification
Speaker 2: with the Trilateral Commission, is the fact that Kennedy, the
Speaker 2: liberal lion of the Eastern Establishment, is considered a worse
Speaker 2: evil than the hated Trilateral Commission. The democratic vote that
Speaker 2: that goes for LaRouche, for example, the twenty percent vote
Speaker 2: in the New Hampshire primary, represents the more sophisticated and
Speaker 2: intellectually tougher voters who have reached the conclusion that what
Speaker 2: is worth fighting for in this year's presidential election is
Speaker 2: a result which will deny the liberal anti American Eastern
Speaker 2: Establishment any access whatsoever to the executive of our government.
Speaker 2: Pretty crazy, he goes on. They say, Thus, despite the
Speaker 2: notoriety of the Trilateral Commission that they have achieved so far,
Speaker 2: the real issue is the election. In the election is
Speaker 2: the liberal Eastern establishment. And within this the Trilateral Commission
Speaker 2: draws attention because it is, as it was meant to be,
Speaker 2: a more visible instrument of the liberal establishment for the
Speaker 2: purpose of drawing to itself the fire of popular outrage.
Speaker 2: Right now, upward of thirty five to forty pamphlets, brochures,
Speaker 2: books and major essays about and against the Trilateral Commission
Speaker 2: are circulating around the country, totally millions of copies reaching
Speaker 2: and informing to varying degrees the electorate. This publication is
Speaker 2: now offered to the public to place the issue of
Speaker 2: the Trilateral Commission in its proper perspective, within the proper
Speaker 2: context of the Liberal Eastern Establishment, to clarify the fundamental
Speaker 2: policy issues on which the Eastern Liberals pin their efforts
Speaker 2: at this time, and to identify the special point man
Speaker 2: role the Establishment assigned to the Commission. So they're trying,
Speaker 2: they're trying to identify the special point man that they've
Speaker 2: established to take over. Really, the Liberal Eastern establishment for
Speaker 2: which the Trilateral Commission is a special purpose instrument, is
Speaker 2: a special purpose instrumentality for a limited period of time,
Speaker 2: is a grouping of powerful families in New York, Boston, Connecticut,
Speaker 2: and elsewhere, which exercises permanent control over the nation's major universities,
Speaker 2: investment banks, law firms, and federal civil service, and threw
Speaker 2: them over an important number of manufacturing corporations. This control,
Speaker 2: per se does not necessarily have to be evil. It
Speaker 2: is the purpose to which it is used, the policy
Speaker 2: to which it is used, that makes it good or evil.
Speaker 2: So then he kind of gets into it, you know.
Speaker 2: It's the tool of the British oligarchy, which is pretty interesting.
Speaker 2: He says. The principle, the principal use to which this
Speaker 2: social power has been used, increasingly since the assassination of
Speaker 2: President McKinley, and decisively since the accession to power of
Speaker 2: President Woodrow Wilson, is to control the foreign policy of
Speaker 2: the United States on behalf of the rolling aristocracy of
Speaker 2: Great Britain. The Eastern establishment itself is not the center
Speaker 2: of the ultimate power. It is an instrumentality on behalf
Speaker 2: of policies of the British oligarchy. Most Americans, upon being
Speaker 2: informed of this fact, react with incredule, incredul What do
Speaker 2: you say that word? Increduduality, incredulity, incredulity, incredulity. Maybe that's it, Okay, Sorry,
Speaker 2: We are not scholars over here, even the most committed
Speaker 2: anti liberals among them. It is, however, an easily proved fact.
Speaker 2: What no American will deny is that all of those
Speaker 2: policies generally identified as liberal in the domestic domain have
Speaker 2: the unmistakable stench of direct and outspoken hostility to American nationalism.
Speaker 2: This is the case for every domestic policy, from the
Speaker 2: issue of school prayer to pledging allegiance to the flag
Speaker 2: in public schools, to the issues of nuclear energy production,
Speaker 2: defense preparedness, universal military training versus the all professional army,
Speaker 2: and so forth. This British controlled Liberal Eastern establishment proclaims
Speaker 2: in its publications that the international order, which was organized
Speaker 2: in the aftermath of the Second World War, the United Nations,
Speaker 2: the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and even NATO,
Speaker 2: was all organized for the fundamental strategic proposition that the
Speaker 2: single most dangerous force in the world's affairs is nationalism,
Speaker 2: especially including American nationalism, which these supernational institutions must try
Speaker 2: to brindle, contain, erode, and finally eliminate. The liberal doctrine
Speaker 2: of unbending. Opposition to nationalism is an idea the British
Speaker 2: oligarchy developed in the beginning of the twentieth century when
Speaker 2: the power of the British Empire began to wane. British
Speaker 2: power wane because four other major nations in the in
Speaker 2: the world community, namely the United States, Germany, France and Japan,
Speaker 2: all overtook Great Britain in industrial production. Russia, with advice
Speaker 2: from American economists in the Hamilton and Kerry tradition, was
Speaker 2: also beginning to threaten British industrial supremacy. So basically he
Speaker 2: is going on to say that like these are like
Speaker 2: our country is being controlled from afar, right, policymakers are
Speaker 2: making policies for people that they're not even you know,
Speaker 2: on the surface controlling, but they actually are. It's pretty
Speaker 2: it's pretty interesting. But then he gets into why the
Speaker 2: Trilateral Commission because I don't want to hear it. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I don't want to hint on the whole British thing
Speaker 2: for too far. But he says the Trilateral Commission was
Speaker 2: formed in nineteen seventy three for a particular purpose. The
Speaker 2: London New York leadership over the rest of the Western
Speaker 2: Alliance was increasingly being challenged because the post World War
Speaker 2: II liberal economic system was discernibly going to pieces. France,
Speaker 2: the Federal Republic of Germany, and also American nationalists forced
Speaker 2: forces coalesced behind the Nixon presidency. We're proposing a new
Speaker 2: orientation in favor of a commitment for renewed industrial development worldwide.
Speaker 2: Such a policy would have meant industrialization of key sectors
Speaker 2: of the Third World, and thus the eventual emergence of
Speaker 2: new sound and strong nations, a repeat of the British
Speaker 2: Night at the turn of the century. Such a policy
Speaker 2: would also have meant that France, the Federal Republic of Germany,
Speaker 2: and Japan, with their special relations with third world nations,
Speaker 2: would experience an industrial boom as their economies mobilized to
Speaker 2: provide the capital goods needed by the new nations. In
Speaker 2: the beginning of nineteen seventy three, the West German deutsch
Speaker 2: Mark had already smashed the British pound, and by July
Speaker 2: and August was on its way to gaining hegemony over
Speaker 2: the ailing US dollar. Then two things happened. David Rockefeller
Speaker 2: formed the Trilateral Commission, and Henry Kissinger manufactured the nineteen
Speaker 2: seventy three October War in the Middle East, which ruined
Speaker 2: the oil supplies of both Western Europe and Japan. Kissinger,
Speaker 2: holding the oil weapon over the Allies heads, forced them
Speaker 2: to go slow and relent. It took it took the
Speaker 2: European industry three years to recover from the shock. So indeed,
Speaker 2: then it says the Trilateral Commission, a special purpose team
Speaker 2: born out of the emergency, is a gathering of influential
Speaker 2: individuals from North America, Europe and Japan, all of whom
Speaker 2: share the same liberal, anti nationalist philosophy of the British oligarchy,
Speaker 2: and all of whom cooperate to prevent the national forces
Speaker 2: within their respective countries from exerting influence on policy. The
Speaker 2: Trilateral Commission was hastily put together for a crude hatchet job,
Speaker 2: running such outfront errands as manipulating presidential elections and circulating
Speaker 2: policy papers with such provocative ideas as quote unquote, the
Speaker 2: end of democracy, the zero growth, and so forth. It
Speaker 2: was typical that a man who enjoys the reputation of
Speaker 2: being New York's stupidest banker, David Rockefeller, was induced and
Speaker 2: manipulated to take all the credit for the operation. Therefore,
Speaker 2: in order to gauge the stated programs and the activities
Speaker 2: of the Trilateral Commission with a measure of justice, one
Speaker 2: must first gauge the current thinking and policy concerns of
Speaker 2: the New York Council on Foreign Relations, the mother entity
Speaker 2: of the Trilateral Commission, as well as the supernational grouping
Speaker 2: into which the CFR blends, the so called Builderberg society,
Speaker 2: in which the nobility of England meets with the Belgian
Speaker 2: and Dutch royalty and the representatives of the House of Habsburg.
Speaker 1: So okay, this is to be the English royal family.
Speaker 2: Right right? So yeah, I mean we can rese.
Speaker 1: Me they're of the House of windsor aren't they Windsor
Speaker 1: right right? Which that I think that their descendants of
Speaker 1: the Habsburgs could be.
Speaker 2: Wrong, right yeah. So I mean we could read a
Speaker 2: little bit deeper if you want to. It's pretty long,
Speaker 2: but oh, this is a good place to start.
Speaker 1: I I like this one though.
Speaker 2: So he gets into this part of the thirty page
Speaker 2: essay and it says how the Trilateral Commission created Jimmy Carter.
Speaker 2: I like examples. This is how I learned. I I
Speaker 2: like hearing from examples kind of thing, you know. But
Speaker 2: it says it was at the annual meeting of the
Speaker 2: Trilateral Commission in Tokyo of nineteen seventy five that Jimmy
Speaker 2: Carter was made the next President of the United States.
Speaker 2: Carter himself was present as the meeting worked out the
Speaker 2: Democratic Party side of the Trilateral slate, which became the
Speaker 2: Carter Administration. Jimmy Carter had been a nobody until he
Speaker 2: was plucked out of his peanut fields by the Trilateral Commission.
Speaker 2: He was quote unquote discovered in late nineteen seventy two
Speaker 2: by the Trilateral Commission's North American Secretary, George Franklin, who
Speaker 2: led a team of quote unquote talent scouts to Atlanta. There,
Speaker 2: along with the Trilateral Commission member Jay Paul Austin, Franklin
Speaker 2: met with Carter. The result of that meeting were aptly
Speaker 2: described by doctor Peter Bourne, Carter's mentor and future drug adviser,
Speaker 2: who was forced out of the administration when he was
Speaker 2: caught passing out phony prescriptions for narcotics to his friends
Speaker 2: in the White House. David Rockepeller and Brazinski had both
Speaker 2: agreed that Carter was the ideal politician to build on Damn.
Speaker 2: What followed was the political and psychological programming of the
Speaker 2: candidate under the personal supervision of Brazinski in Born. According
Speaker 2: to Franklin, Carter attended every Trilateral Commission session in circulated
Speaker 2: copies of the Commission's reports, to every Democratic Party function
Speaker 2: he attended. As early as October of nineteen seventy three,
Speaker 2: Brazinski had shaped the Carter profile in quotes, the Democratic
Speaker 2: candidate in nineteen seventy six will have to emphasize work
Speaker 2: the family, religion, and increasingly patriotism if he has any
Speaker 2: desire to be elected. Wow, dude, they tell you what
Speaker 2: they need to run on. Like these people are not
Speaker 2: you know, it's not something that is genuine, it's not
Speaker 2: something that's sincere. Most of the time with these presidents,
Speaker 2: they're given a platform to run on and they have
Speaker 2: to just talk about this shit because look, you got
Speaker 2: to feed a couple of chips to the mess. You
Speaker 2: know what I'm saying, do your job, be a good puppet.
Speaker 2: Say what's on the teleprompter? All good things, Yes, it says.
Speaker 2: What put the images across to the public was the
Speaker 2: controlled national media. They were talking about this shit in
Speaker 2: the seventies, dude, the controlled media. Cyrus Vance, then on
Speaker 2: the board of directors of the New York Times, called
Speaker 2: into play the full resources of the Times and its
Speaker 2: networks on Jimmie's behalf. As Ray Wetzel, CBS's general manager
Speaker 2: of its election unit, recently told the story in quotes,
Speaker 2: Jimmy Carter went to a dinner in Iowa and won
Speaker 2: a straw poll, and The New York Times wrote an
Speaker 2: article saying he's strong in Iowa. They've been controlling the
Speaker 2: fucking media forever, dude.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, Yet, even with the significant resources of the Eastern
Speaker 2: Establishment behind him, Jimmy Carter did not win the nineteen
Speaker 2: seventy six election. The actual vote for Carter could be
Speaker 2: expected to come from the twenty five to thirty percent
Speaker 2: of the population that is liberal. The additional twenty to
Speaker 2: thirty percent of what had been the base of the
Speaker 2: Democratic Party had shown by its abstention basically absent from
Speaker 2: the primaries, that they wanted nothing to do with Carter
Speaker 2: or his program. It has estimated that on election night,
Speaker 2: up to five million fraudulent votes were handed to the
Speaker 2: Trilateral Commission's candidate. Wo five billion, five million fraudulent votes
Speaker 2: were handed to the Trilateral Commissions candidate.
Speaker 3: So keep in mind, this election that just happened was
Speaker 3: allegedly the largest voter turned out of any election.
Speaker 1: Right, yep, that's what they say, grand totally. It was
Speaker 1: like seventy four million to seventy million, wasn't it.
Speaker 2: Seventy four to seventy one or seventy three to seventy
Speaker 2: something like that.
Speaker 3: Okay, so five million would have swayed this the entire
Speaker 3: opposite direction.
Speaker 2: Oh and he still didn't win.
Speaker 1: That's crazy. Act. Then they were trying to sway it's
Speaker 1: a five million. That's not a small sway. That's a
Speaker 1: massive sway.
Speaker 3: That would have been the deciding factor between the Trump
Speaker 3: Harris election.
Speaker 1: You want to talk about what that was back then?
Speaker 2: Oh dude. It gets even crazier. By personally ordering the
Speaker 2: impounding of the New York voting machines, President Gerald Ford
Speaker 2: acknowledged that he knew that he had won the election,
Speaker 2: but nine hours later Ford conceded and Jimmy Carter was
Speaker 2: the President elect of the United States.
Speaker 1: Oh stealing due.
Speaker 2: Oh shit. They're like, yo, I mean, we can only
Speaker 2: pump the numbers up so much. But either way, you're
Speaker 2: you're getting placed in there. Don't even worry about it, right, Wow, dude,
Speaker 2: that is crazy. So that's whenever this LaRouche guy comes
Speaker 2: in and he says, a Carter presidency means war, which
Speaker 2: is very very interesting. All right, So it says this
Speaker 2: is an excerpt of the nationally televised address of Lyndon
Speaker 2: Larouge on the night of November first, nineteen seventy six,
Speaker 2: when the candidate warned of the consequences of a Carter
Speaker 2: administry coming into power. So this is literally what he
Speaker 2: said about Carter. He goes, I want to speak to
Speaker 2: you on behalf of many concerned Republicans, many concerned Democrats,
Speaker 2: and many concerned European leaders. We are convinced that the
Speaker 2: election of Jimmy Carter to President of the United States
Speaker 2: on November two would mean that the United States, to
Speaker 2: all intents and purposes, was irreversibly committed to thermonuclear war.
Speaker 2: I shall indicate to you the basic facts upon which
Speaker 2: we promisee which we premise that conclusion. There are two
Speaker 2: dominant tendencies in present US foreign policy. Carter's advisors represent
Speaker 2: one of those tendencies. Because the world monetary system, created
Speaker 2: at the end of the World War two is now collapsing,
Speaker 2: certain forces within the United States are committed to attempting
Speaker 2: to save this bankrupt monetary system. The methods to which
Speaker 2: they are resorting are consciously modeled on those used earlier
Speaker 2: by Halamar Shatt, which was Hitler's finance minister, oh Shit,
Speaker 2: particularly during the nineteen thirty three to nineteen thirty six period.
Speaker 2: They are resorting to methods of extreme austerity auto cannibalistic
Speaker 2: austerity in the efforts to squeeze out of real incomes
Speaker 2: out of essential services and out of the capital of
Speaker 2: industry itself sufficient wealth to roll over for at least
Speaker 2: a time some of the bankrupt debt holdings of certain
Speaker 2: financial interest. These measures are bad enough in the United
Speaker 2: States we see in New York City what this leads to,
Speaker 2: but they're bad in Europe and Japan. But in the
Speaker 2: developing sector, these austerity measures mean genocide. George Ball, a
Speaker 2: leading of the leading member of the Council on Foreign
Speaker 2: Relations and the Trilateral Commission, is very explicit on this.
Speaker 2: In his current book called Diplomacy in a Crowded World,
Speaker 2: Ball propos he proposes that because he sees certain things
Speaker 2: which could solve these problems as being unlikely, that he
Speaker 2: would resort to what he calls triage. That is, we
Speaker 2: must decide what portion of the present world population must
Speaker 2: die and manage food supplies in such a way so
Speaker 2: as to determine who dies and who lives. That is
Speaker 2: the policy of Ball, that is the policy of Henry Kissinger,
Speaker 2: that is the policy of this dominant group in the
Speaker 2: United States. Now, obviously, such a policy cannot be imposed
Speaker 2: in the developing sector by the will of the people
Speaker 2: in that sector. The people of the developing sector will
Speaker 2: not in general tolerated. Therefore, it is obvious that what
Speaker 2: Ball proposes, what other carterbackers propose, what Kissinger and others propose,
Speaker 2: is that the developing nations be placed under a kind
Speaker 2: of NATO dictatorship. What Kissinger and some others recognize that
Speaker 2: a policy of putting most of the developing sector under
Speaker 2: this kind of NATO sovereignty means war with the Soviet Union.
Speaker 2: Kissinger and others believe, or at least espouse, the belief
Speaker 2: that such a war can be avoided by successfully forcing
Speaker 2: the Soviet Union to back down through bluffing. Now, the
Speaker 2: problem with Kissinger's policy, and this is where the immediate
Speaker 2: war danger rises, is that Kissinger is like a poker
Speaker 2: player sitting with a dead hand of cards with mirrors
Speaker 2: behind his back, trying to bluff his opponent. Everyone in NATO,
Speaker 2: I like how you put that. Everyone in NATO whom
Speaker 2: I've spoken to, and the Soviets as well, know that
Speaker 2: at this time, if the United States and NATO were
Speaker 2: to be involved in either a conventional or a limited
Speaker 2: nuclear war or a thermonuclear war with the Soviet Union,
Speaker 2: NATO would be defeated.
Speaker 1: I think that they Yeah, that kind of age like
Speaker 1: bad milk, didn't it that whole? If Carter gets elected,
Speaker 1: clearly we will go to thermonuclear war. And it's like, well,
Speaker 1: that was a big shwing in a miss. Matter of fact,
Speaker 1: Carter was seen as such a pussy that everybody was
Speaker 1: like super excited when Reagan came into office because he
Speaker 1: was like very pro military. Carter was kind of a
Speaker 1: kind of a spineless guy in the end of it all.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, you kind of have to be spineless
Speaker 2: if you don't have any control when you're being told
Speaker 2: what to do.
Speaker 1: It was a good puppet, I'll give him that, he was.
Speaker 2: He was. Oh this is where it gets interesting though,
Speaker 2: all right, so he talks about the dictatorship from nineteen
Speaker 2: seventy six to nineteen eighty. He goes all the important
Speaker 2: industrial sectors of the US economy are in sharp decline.
Speaker 2: Auto production is down twenty two percent over the last year,
Speaker 2: home building down thirty percent, consumer durable goods as a
Speaker 2: whole down ten percent, and steel is down ten percent.
Speaker 3: Although the quick, real quick, how interesting is it that
Speaker 3: that's what they were talking about in the seventies that
Speaker 3: sounds like something I've heard here in the last six
Speaker 3: months or so, Isn't it sounds like things that i've
Speaker 3: It sounds familiar.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, well, it's always the same issues, you know,
Speaker 2: different people. Absolutely, But it says although the machinery industry
Speaker 2: is working to capacity, almost all of its output is
Speaker 2: now going to wasteful spending to satisfy Washington environmentalists for
Speaker 2: retooling auto assembly lines to make quote unquote fuel efficient
Speaker 2: but less safe cars. The dollar as recommended by Trilateral
Speaker 2: Commission members Paul Volkler or Volker, Richard Cooper, and Anthony Solomon,
Speaker 2: The administration has tried to eliminate the reserve currency role
Speaker 2: of the dollar. As a result, the dollars value internationally
Speaker 2: has fallen against the price of gold from one hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty dollars per per fine troy ounce to six
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty since Carter took office, a seventy percent devaluation.
Speaker 2: The pool of dollar obligations held aboard held abroad has
Speaker 2: swollen swollen to more than a trillion dollars the euro
Speaker 2: dollar market, and has made the dollar a cigar coupon money.
Speaker 1: Wow. I will say this though, the uh, how he
Speaker 1: kind of shipped on the quote unquote fuel efficient but
Speaker 1: less safe cars. So let's get this is seventy six, wasn't.
Speaker 2: It seventy six, seventy seven somewhere in there.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so seventy six to eighties, so like, yeah, they
Speaker 1: were legal. They were kind of losing those big body
Speaker 1: American style cars with steel frames and shit, but you
Speaker 1: still had like a seventy six Camaro and like the
Speaker 1: quote unquote fuel efficient, like as opposed to nine ga
Speaker 1: nine miles to the gallon, you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: They were talking about maybe up in that's like twenty
Speaker 1: That was some economical shit.
Speaker 3: Back then, you know what I mean, But to the
Speaker 3: whole like less safe. Man, I don't even know how
Speaker 3: many of those cars were mandatory to have airbags.
Speaker 2: I don't know. Well that's I mean. Nextly he gets
Speaker 2: into the budget deficit as well, which is pretty interesting,
Speaker 2: he says. Although Carter claims that his budget deficit for
Speaker 2: the next fiscal year will be sixteen billion and may
Speaker 2: propose to eliminate sixteen billion of spending, the actual budget
Speaker 2: deficit will be about one hundred and fifteen billion, the
Speaker 2: worst in history. Even worse than the deficit itself is
Speaker 2: the fact that it would be incurred through the most
Speaker 2: wasteful and inflationary types of federal spending, for example, Carter's
Speaker 2: synthetic fuel boondoggles. Carter is not counting an additional twenty
Speaker 2: five billion in interest payments on the national debt due
Speaker 2: to fifteen percent treasury bills. So yeah, then it kind
Speaker 2: of has like the interest rates and how the market
Speaker 2: and auto production and the price of gold and the
Speaker 2: value of the dollar going down, the price of gold
Speaker 2: going up, auto production spiking like crazy.
Speaker 1: Bro, What was that deficit? Again? It was, where am
Speaker 1: I increasing the deficit to one hundred and fifteen billion?
Speaker 3: Worst in history? Do you know what our current deficit
Speaker 3: is at?
Speaker 2: It's like twenty trillion now, isn't.
Speaker 1: It thirty five trillion?
Speaker 2: Goo?
Speaker 1: Man? One hundred and fifteen billion in national deficit? Man?
Speaker 1: That was that was some shit for them back then.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, it was. Well, that just goes to show
Speaker 2: how devalued the dollar is, because one hundred and fifteen
Speaker 2: billion dollars was a shitload of money. Now you're marketing
Speaker 2: it up against thirty trillion, I mean, it's funny money. Now.
Speaker 3: Millionaires were like, what billionaires are to us now back
Speaker 3: in the say he's to be a millionaire in the seventies, bro,
Speaker 3: you you pretty much had God.
Speaker 2: Money right right. Well, and you know what's interesting is
Speaker 2: that he does get into energy and nuclear energy. They
Speaker 2: were talking about this shit way back then. Absolutely, also
Speaker 2: foreign policies. What else ran right dictatorship? Yeah, it says
Speaker 2: since Jimmy Carter came into the White House, he and
Speaker 2: his have successfully moved the United States government closer to
Speaker 2: a government by decree. The key planning document for this
Speaker 2: transformation was issued by the Trilateral Commission immediately following the
Speaker 2: November of election the November election of nineteen seventy six,
Speaker 2: Entitled Remaking Foreign Policy, The document, authored by Commissioner Peter
Speaker 2: something In Graham Allison, called for a streamlining of the
Speaker 2: executive branch. So basically the recommendations rapidly put into operation
Speaker 2: after Carter took office were number one, the creative the
Speaker 2: creation of an Executive Committee in the Cabinet consisting of
Speaker 2: the President, the Secretary of State, Treasury, the Defense and
Speaker 2: the National Security Advisor. The X the ex CAB or
Speaker 2: the the ex Committee in the Cabinet functions as a
Speaker 2: crisis team that implements policy beyond the purview of Congress.
Speaker 2: The White House the number two, it says, the White House.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, the setting up of a series of czar
Speaker 2: positions in the White House. Within six months of his inauguration,
Speaker 2: Carter created a new Department of Energy with emergency powers
Speaker 2: under the Trilateral Commissions James Schleisinger, who had earlier been
Speaker 2: fired from the Ford administration for his advocacy of limited
Speaker 2: nuclear warfare with the Soviet Union. Oh shit, wow. And
Speaker 2: then and then FEMA was established by President Review Memorandum
Speaker 2: thirty two, drafted last spring by National Security Council staff
Speaker 2: member in the Trilateral Commission member Samuel Huntington. Damn.
Speaker 3: So I'm just throwing out that czar position kind of
Speaker 3: like how Kamala was the border Czar at one point
Speaker 3: in time, right, Yeah, that was an actual position that
Speaker 3: has been a thing since the fucking Carter administration. That
Speaker 3: wasn't just some prance around nickname title they gave her.
Speaker 3: That was an actual job she was appointed to do,
Speaker 3: right Okay.
Speaker 2: Oh man, dude. It talks about how this this this
Speaker 2: Trilateral Commission essentially set up FEMA and what what it was,
Speaker 2: you know, essentially made to do. And it says under
Speaker 2: FEMA's enabling legislation, at the point that a national emergency
Speaker 2: is declared, such as one call due to a shut
Speaker 2: off of foreign oil, FEMA is authorized to bypass all
Speaker 2: constitutionality constituted powers to carry out the decrees it deems necessary. Wow,
Speaker 2: So FEMA is its own fucking branch in and of
Speaker 2: itself at that point.
Speaker 3: Once a state of emergency has been called, FEMA has
Speaker 3: all autonomous rights.
Speaker 1: To do what the fuck they want. Yeah.
Speaker 2: It says that FEMA does not operate under the President directly,
Speaker 2: but under the National Security Council. FEMA mandates an executive
Speaker 2: council within the National Security Council called the Emergency Management
Speaker 2: Committee as the Crisis Command Center. This commits, he chaired
Speaker 2: by the FEMA Director, includes the National Security Advisor Brazinski,
Speaker 2: interesting because he was, you know, on that board, the
Speaker 2: Assistant to the President for Domestic Affairs, Stuart Eisenstadt, the
Speaker 2: Director of the Office of Management and the Budget and
Speaker 2: the Budget of This John McIntyre, and the NSC Assistant
Speaker 2: for Policy and Inner Governmental Relations David Aaron. So all
Speaker 2: those people are on the board with FEMA, and they
Speaker 2: have all that control if something was to go awry
Speaker 2: or not really their way. I think, Okay, pretty interesting,
Speaker 2: So I don't want to go too far into the
Speaker 2: FEMA shit. But then it gets into the nineteen eighty election. Look,
Speaker 2: we don't really need to stick on this. My point
Speaker 2: was is that this guy was calling out so much
Speaker 2: of it, and he was deemed like the literal enemy
Speaker 2: of the Trilateral Commission. But you know, this guy was.
Speaker 1: Figure when he become a cult leader.
Speaker 3: Thus far, this seems like and he was running for
Speaker 3: he was trying to get a nomination. It sounds like
Speaker 3: he was just calling out the political elites, very very
Speaker 3: similar to Trump.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact. It's just that this guy
Speaker 1: wasn't like as big of a household name.
Speaker 2: Well, it's quite funny that you bring up the name Trump,
Speaker 2: my good man, because that's where we're gonna get to.
Speaker 3: Okay, oh god, And I just realized why was he
Speaker 3: considered a cult leader? There are those that will look
Speaker 3: at Donald Trump and okay, all.
Speaker 2: Right, okay, So now I want to go over to
Speaker 2: this website called Stateothenation dot com. Okay, and this website
Speaker 2: gets into the Trilateral Commission members serving in the Biden administration.
Speaker 2: Let's go currently serving. Okay, this is very interesting because
Speaker 2: remember if you're a member of the Trilateral Commission, you
Speaker 2: can't be a member of the Trilateral Commission and serve
Speaker 2: you know, the country, but you can temporary, temporarily put
Speaker 2: a pause to your you know, aligning to the Trilateral Commission.
Speaker 2: You can put a temporary pause to your membership if
Speaker 2: you do become this, and then you can also go
Speaker 2: back to the Trilateral Commission as soon as you're done
Speaker 2: doing your civic duty.
Speaker 1: Got you, okay?
Speaker 2: Okay. So these are all of the people that are
Speaker 2: on the Trilateral Commission or that were on the Trilateral
Speaker 2: Commission that they're now serving the Abiden administration. All right,
Speaker 2: So it says the Trilateral Commission started in nineteen seventy
Speaker 2: seventy three to create new international economic order and was
Speaker 2: the fountain head of modern globalization. Their members have dominated
Speaker 2: every administration since, and the Biden administration is no exception.
Speaker 2: The two most elite posts are the Secretary of State
Speaker 2: Blinking and the National Security Advisor Sullivan. To say that
Speaker 2: the Commission is mothballs in twenty twenty two is foolishness.
Speaker 2: He go, I am asked frequently on radio slash TV
Speaker 2: interviews to explain who are the movers and shakers in
Speaker 2: the world. Here is a list of US globalists who
Speaker 2: are at the top of the pyramid. Study these names
Speaker 2: and consider their connections and influence. The list below contains
Speaker 2: only current US members of the Trilateral Commission. Members from
Speaker 2: Mexico and Canada are removed only to allow focus on
Speaker 2: the United States. Then he also have link he has
Speaker 2: links to, you know, the members of Asia and Europe
Speaker 2: and all that. Okay, but current right now, former members
Speaker 2: that are in public service. You have Tony Blanket, Secretary
Speaker 2: of State. Okay. You have a Layel Brainard who is
Speaker 2: the US Federal Reserve's Board of Governors. You have, oh,
Speaker 2: another Brazinski. How about that? The brazinskis just keep on coming. Well,
Speaker 2: I mean a.
Speaker 1: Political dynasty's dog.
Speaker 2: Well, this Brazinski happens to be US ambassador to Poland.
Speaker 2: Oh how about those times?
Speaker 1: Okay?
Speaker 2: Then you have are Nicholas Burns, who is the US
Speaker 2: Ambassador to China. You have Ken just who is the
Speaker 2: US Ambassador to India. David Lipton, who is the first
Speaker 2: Deputy Managing Director the International Monetary Fund Okay, that's pretty
Speaker 2: big spot. Then you have Wendy Sherman, who is the
Speaker 2: US Deputy Secretary of State, and then Jake Sullivan, who
Speaker 2: is the US National Security Advisor. So then it gets
Speaker 2: into so those are the former members in public service.
Speaker 2: The North American of.
Speaker 1: All Star list right there of people in the top.
Speaker 2: Oh wait to hear some of these names down here, dude.
Speaker 2: So you have the North American membership, which is b
Speaker 2: Mark Allen. He is the chief Strategy Officer and Senior
Speaker 2: Vice president of Boeing.
Speaker 1: Ooh, that's a biggin.
Speaker 2: Then you have Graham Allison. She is a Douglas Dylon
Speaker 2: Professor of Government, Harvard Kennedy School of Cambridge of Cambridge,
Speaker 2: former Rector of the Science and International Affairs of the
Speaker 2: Belfer Center and then the JFK School of Government, the
Speaker 2: formal Special Advisor to Secretary of Defense, and former Assistant
Speaker 2: Secretary of Defense. So she's a heavy hitter or he
Speaker 2: he I'm sorry. Then you have Rona Ambrose, who is
Speaker 2: the Deputy chairwoman of TD Securities, Bruce Andrews, which is
Speaker 2: the Corporate VP and Chief Government Affairs Officer of Intel.
Speaker 2: He's also the former Secretary Deputy Secretary of Commerce.
Speaker 15: A J.
Speaker 2: Banga he's a vice chairman of General Atlantic and former president, oh,
Speaker 2: former president and CEO of MasterCard.
Speaker 1: Okay, that is he is in fact a Banga dog.
Speaker 2: Bang a dude. Then you got Douglas beck He's the
Speaker 2: VP of Apple, so pretty big, big name there. Michael Beckerman,
Speaker 2: who is the VP and head of America's Public Policy
Speaker 2: on TikTok Ooh that's weird, but all right. Interesting. Then
Speaker 2: you have Joshua Berkowitz. He's the CEO of a thing
Speaker 2: called play score and which is a US based sports
Speaker 2: gaming company, and founder and president of Shield Street Capital.
Speaker 2: Just go down a couple of more of these names.
Speaker 2: You have the Catherine Bertini, who is the public administration
Speaker 2: in international affairs. You have Michael Bloomberg on this list.
Speaker 2: We know that name, founder and CEO of Bloomberg LP,
Speaker 2: former mayor of New York City. You have Ian Bremer,
Speaker 2: who is the president of the Eurasia Group. Esther Bremmer
Speaker 2: is the executive director and CEO of NAFSA n af
Speaker 2: S A, I don't know what that one is.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Steve Brunnell, who is the chief Legal Officer of DM
Speaker 2: Association oh, and also the former General Counsel of the
Speaker 2: US Department of Homeland Security.
Speaker 1: Okay, so another big group of hitters.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, dude.
Speaker 1: Basically when TikTok one kind of threw me off and
Speaker 1: the mobile gaming guy kind of threw me off. But
Speaker 1: at the same time, that's where the money's at these days,
Speaker 1: so I get it.
Speaker 2: Right, right. Basically I'm trying to show here is that
Speaker 2: these are all of Biden's people on his administration that
Speaker 2: were members of the Trilateral Commission. Let's just be honest.
Speaker 2: No such thing as were you are. It's just paperwork
Speaker 2: says that you were, right, So if.
Speaker 1: You're a part of the agency, you're never not a
Speaker 1: part of the agency.
Speaker 2: Bro right right. It's like you know marines, dude, are
Speaker 2: you ever gonna say that you're an ex marine? No,
Speaker 2: you're just a marine thing. You're just a marine. So oh,
Speaker 2: by the way, happy Veterans Day, good sir.
Speaker 1: Thank you, thank you.
Speaker 3: And the two forty ninth birthday also happened, so yeah,
Speaker 3: it was a good one. No one got me a
Speaker 3: little free lunch today was all right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I went to I went to Denny's earlier because
Speaker 2: my car tire had popped, and so I had to
Speaker 2: go over to Discount Tire and the only thing that
Speaker 2: was in walking distance was fucking Denny's. It was packed full.
Speaker 3: I didn't realize that was today for you, dude, when
Speaker 3: you were telling me that story you were stuck it
Speaker 3: going to Denny's on Veterans Day.
Speaker 1: Holy fuck. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I honestly I forgot that it was Veterans Day. So
Speaker 2: whenever I get there, I'm like, why is Denny's popping
Speaker 2: like this on a Monday morning?
Speaker 1: Yeah, no doubt, dude. This is the first year that
Speaker 1: I actually didn't run the gauntlet like I typically do.
Speaker 1: I only made a couple of little stops, but I
Speaker 1: wasn't mad at it.
Speaker 3: You know, Typically we tried to hit like thirty to
Speaker 3: forty restaurants in a matter of like six hours and
Speaker 3: just get everything to go.
Speaker 1: Bro. We stuck up and eat like kings for the
Speaker 1: rest of the week and into the weekend.
Speaker 3: Man, me, the kids, everybody. We eaten like the best shit.
Speaker 3: But this year, I just I wasn't really feeling it.
Speaker 3: I had a lot of things going on. I was running,
Speaker 3: so I just kind of stopped in and got me
Speaker 3: a little you know, a little.
Speaker 2: Some Oh you went to Denny's or you in some
Speaker 2: other place.
Speaker 1: I went to California Pizza Kitchen.
Speaker 2: Actually, oh word, okay, yeah.
Speaker 3: It wasn't a bad It wasn't a bad offshoot. I
Speaker 3: was trying to go to BJ's, fucking the brew house
Speaker 3: I love.
Speaker 1: This year. They didn't do the little menu this year
Speaker 1: then only gave like.
Speaker 3: A coupon for a free appetizer dessert for your next visit.
Speaker 3: And I was like, well, I mean that's cool and
Speaker 3: I appreciate it, but like, damn, there's like five other
Speaker 3: places around here that are giving free meals right now.
Speaker 1: So I hit up old CPK. It was solid little
Speaker 1: Hawaiian pizza.
Speaker 2: I mean, we also love Bej's from time to time
Speaker 2: as well, you know.
Speaker 3: I do, indeed I do, indeed very similar house. The
Speaker 3: California Pizza Kitchen got a Hawaiian pizza. Pineapple belongs on it, okay,
Speaker 3: And for certain people it's like eating ass. Look, certain
Speaker 3: people think it's not for you. Certain people know what's
Speaker 3: up pineapple and pizza.
Speaker 1: Certain people think that that doesn't belong there, and certain people,
Speaker 1: you know, are just incorrect. That's all I'm saying.
Speaker 2: You're halfway correct. I love pineapple on pizza. I will
Speaker 2: not eat ass.
Speaker 3: I'm not judging one way or another dog. I'm just
Speaker 3: saying I like pineapple on my pizza.
Speaker 2: I prefer the front butt personally.
Speaker 1: If it's a oh my god, if it's a whole
Speaker 1: front butt, you probably never mind. Not gonna start shitting
Speaker 1: on body styles. Let's continue.
Speaker 2: You're talking about butts and then you say shit, and
Speaker 2: it's like.
Speaker 3: Uh, I mean if she has a whole ass on
Speaker 3: the front and the no MONTHN month?
Speaker 1: All right?
Speaker 2: Anyway, all right, So you see the massive list of
Speaker 2: the Trilateral Commission members serving in the Biden administration. By
Speaker 2: the way, this article is written in twenty twenty two,
Speaker 2: so all these people are most likely still there because
Speaker 2: Biden never fired anybody.
Speaker 1: No one, not a single person.
Speaker 2: And so literally, look how long this list goes. Bro
Speaker 2: Keep in mind, there's only three hundred and ninety members
Speaker 2: in that group in the Trilateral Commission, and how many
Speaker 2: of them are listed here? I mean, it goes.
Speaker 3: Didn't They just say that the presidents of made like
Speaker 3: sixteen thousand appointments in two weeks. So interesting that somewhere
Speaker 3: in the mix of all those appointments all the members
Speaker 3: of the Trilateral Commission got hooked up.
Speaker 2: Like there's literally there's over one hundred names here former
Speaker 2: or current Trilateral Commission.
Speaker 1: That is wild, dude.
Speaker 2: So now let's see do they really control everybody. We
Speaker 2: already knew that Biden was a puppet. We knew that
Speaker 2: Kamala was a puppet. That's why we talked shit on them,
Speaker 2: because we know that they're not real people, you know,
Speaker 2: like these people are puppets. They're just masks. They're not
Speaker 2: actual soul filled humans, you know what I mean. They've
Speaker 2: sold out to get to where they are. They don't
Speaker 2: actually believe in anything, they don't stand for anything. They
Speaker 2: know that they are just, you know, puppets for the machine.
Speaker 2: And so let's see. Let's see if your boy Trump
Speaker 2: has any names in his cabinet back whenever he was
Speaker 2: president from sixteen to twenty. Okay, well, let's see. It
Speaker 2: says the CFR, the Council of Foreign Relations, and the
Speaker 2: Trilateral Commission's members in Trump's cabinet, and then it also
Speaker 2: gets into Hillary's ghost cabinet, which is pretty interesting.
Speaker 1: I like it.
Speaker 2: This is by Medium, one of my favorite websites, Medium
Speaker 2: dot Com. It says, if you've read your professor Carol
Speaker 2: Quigley and Professor Thomas Sutton, you know that the role
Speaker 2: of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission plays in US
Speaker 2: foreign and domestic policy. These two NGOs non governmental organizations.
Speaker 2: I believe these two NGOs were set up by David
Speaker 2: Rockefeller and the rest of Wall Street crowd to set
Speaker 2: the US government policy and provide a sort of employment
Speaker 2: agency slash personal personnel bank for crucial governmental and corporate
Speaker 2: positions in order to make sure that policy is enacted.
Speaker 2: For instance, Obama's cabinet was full of Council on Foreign
Speaker 2: Relation guys and key positions. So he had the CFR guys,
Speaker 2: Biden had the the the Trilateral Commission guys. Right, yeah,
Speaker 2: it says, which I'm not gonna lie to you. A
Speaker 2: lot of them are one and the same. They play
Speaker 2: for the same team.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean both were started by Rockefeller. Correct.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure about the Council on Formulations. I know
Speaker 2: that this one was okay, but it says. One of
Speaker 2: the key emails released in recent wiki leaks was sent
Speaker 2: on October eighth of two thousand and eight from Michael Frohman,
Speaker 2: a CFR member who was an executive of City Group
Speaker 2: to John Podesta in the email froman mapped out the
Speaker 2: incoming cabinet. Damn, they were dropping the cabinet members in
Speaker 2: the fucking wiki leagues.
Speaker 3: Yes, indeed do we talked about that. As a matter
Speaker 3: of fact, of Browhemian Grove, the named Froeman came up.
Speaker 2: It did, it did well, It says. If you want
Speaker 2: to understand the role in functioning of the American deep state,
Speaker 2: the CFR and the Trilateral Commission are crucial, it says. Fortunately,
Speaker 2: both bodies publish a list of their members. The CFR's
Speaker 2: list is here and the Trilateral Commission list is here.
Speaker 2: Maybe we can go down some of those current names.
Speaker 2: So he goes, let's take a look at Trump's incoming cabinet.
Speaker 2: Are you ready for it?
Speaker 1: I am none. This is back.
Speaker 3: Remember he even said that like he didn't know what
Speaker 3: he was doing. He just kind of went with the
Speaker 3: flow and the point of people he was told to appoint.
Speaker 3: He said that that happened last time, So let's see
Speaker 3: how deep that goes.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so back in twenty sixteen, how many members did
Speaker 2: he have on his board that were from the Trilateral Commission.
Speaker 2: The answer is, none of the incoming cabinet members are
Speaker 2: on the Trilateral Commission, really, none of them.
Speaker 1: So but a lot of them are from the CFR.
Speaker 2: Two of them are from the CFR. You got to
Speaker 2: think about it. It's a lot of jobs to be filling.
Speaker 2: It says there are two cabin members who are taking
Speaker 2: marginal positions and who are CFR members. Robert Light's light
Speaker 2: thiser who's a trade representative, and Elaine Chow, who is
Speaker 2: a Secretary of Transportation. And that's it.
Speaker 1: Wow, So that's actually that's pretty solid, dude.
Speaker 2: Right right, So if you want to follow the money,
Speaker 2: you want to really show that Trump is not a
Speaker 2: part of this, of this shit storm. Oh it's just
Speaker 2: one wing of this of the same ego of the
Speaker 2: of the other wing kind of thing. No, right, he
Speaker 2: actually is set apart because the actual world's elites, the
Speaker 2: actual world's puppets, do not have control of him. And
Speaker 2: the proof is in the pudding right here.
Speaker 1: Damn dude. And he said that he disappointed people that
Speaker 1: he didn't even know what he was doing, and somehow
Speaker 1: he still was like, no matter what, keep the fucking
Speaker 1: CFR and the Trilateral Commission, out of here.
Speaker 2: Yeah, dude, Well check this out. Contrast that with the cabinet,
Speaker 2: the cabinet that Hillary Clinton would have appointed appointed she
Speaker 2: had she have won the election. So I guess they
Speaker 2: show the cabinet before they win. Whatever.
Speaker 1: Well, they try to.
Speaker 3: Get their ducks in a road depending on how election
Speaker 3: night will go. But they you know, they try to
Speaker 3: make a couple of like preemptive deals happen for sure, right.
Speaker 2: Well, it says Clinton is not a member of the
Speaker 2: Council on Foreign Relations because her husband and daughter are Wow, Okay.
Speaker 2: It says she's given eight speeches there. In this one
Speaker 2: given while she was the Secretary of State, she explicitly
Speaker 2: says that the Council on Foreign Relations was setting her policy.
Speaker 2: In this email, well, we might have to click on that.
Speaker 2: She says that she's going to see Afar to report
Speaker 2: on progress that she's made while at State. Her Secretary
Speaker 2: of State would have been John Podesta, which we're not
Speaker 2: fans of, huge, huge Podesta fans.
Speaker 1: Over here, right, Nophie are not.
Speaker 2: Now, he's not a CFR guy, though the Center for
Speaker 2: American Progress, which he founded, seems to be an affiliated shop.
Speaker 2: His sister, May Podesta is a CFR member, and you
Speaker 2: can read the email chain where Podesta is going back
Speaker 2: and forth with her about the ways that he can
Speaker 2: get her into the CFR. Oh shit, dude, Wow, that's
Speaker 2: the swamp. I believe that this is the swamp that
Speaker 2: they've been talking about.
Speaker 3: Get your chest waiters on. We deep in the fucking
Speaker 3: swamp here, dude.
Speaker 2: So here's a couple of the people that would have
Speaker 2: been the members on in Hillary's cabinet. It says the
Speaker 2: CFR members in the ghost cabinet. It says Cheryl Sandberg
Speaker 2: would have been the Secretary of Treasury from the CFR.
Speaker 2: Michelle Floreny would have been the Secretary of Defense, and
Speaker 2: she's also on the Trilateral Commission. Tom Donilon would have
Speaker 2: been either the the director of the CIA or National Intelligence.
Speaker 2: He's on the Trilateral Commission. And it says, in short,
Speaker 2: given the historical degree to which CFR and the Trilateral
Speaker 2: Commission has been represented in key cabinet roles in the
Speaker 2: last sixty years, this is quite a revolution against the
Speaker 2: American deep state. Unless something major happens, like Trump getting assassinated,
Speaker 2: then this article is written in twenty fifteen, by the way. Wow,
Speaker 2: Unless something major happens like Trump getting assassinated, I expect
Speaker 2: profound policy changes. I asked that anyone who finds this
Speaker 2: subject interesting to share this posting comment on it. So
Speaker 2: you wonder why Trump was, you know, had his life,
Speaker 2: you know, almost taken away from him multiple times. Why
Speaker 2: the mass media has been targeting him big time by
Speaker 2: all these corporations and the fucking mayors of DC and
Speaker 2: everybody's trying to go after him. It's not because he's
Speaker 2: a misogynist pig and he's such a racist piece of shit. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: you can't even and find any of the quotes that
Speaker 2: he said that would even pertain to that level of thinking. Yep,
Speaker 2: you're letting these people literally manipulate your mind, not because
Speaker 2: they care, but because they're a part of these special
Speaker 2: interest groups. These special interest groups are like fucking octopus
Speaker 2: arms pro They spread everywhere, to the media, to i
Speaker 2: mean politics, policies, the federal level, the state level, the
Speaker 2: local level, like every single place.
Speaker 4: Dude.
Speaker 2: These people are put in place because they're globalists, and
Speaker 2: Trump is the opposite of a globalist. Whenever we read
Speaker 2: this kind of stuff, he had hardly anybody from the
Speaker 2: accounts on foreign relations in his cabinet, and he had
Speaker 2: literally nobody from the Trilateral Commission, of which he's the
Speaker 2: only president since the inception of the Trilateral Commission who
Speaker 2: never had somebody from the Trilateral Commission in his cabinet.
Speaker 3: How about that, he's going against the establishment, and by
Speaker 3: the establishment, we're talking about this, the CFR, the Trilateral
Speaker 3: He's going against that, and he's not.
Speaker 1: Playing by their rules. Now. He wants air national trade,
Speaker 1: he wants air national growth and economy, but he doesn't
Speaker 1: want globalization. He's very much trying to play for America.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he is. So I'm gonna be honest with you.
Speaker 2: I wasn't searching to try and prove Trump to be
Speaker 2: a good guy or anything like that. I really was
Speaker 2: just diving into the Trilateral Commission, you know, just that
Speaker 2: rabbit hole, right, And you know, it's kind of hard
Speaker 2: to understand because it's a lot of political jargon, it's
Speaker 2: a lot of you know, gonna be honest with you,
Speaker 2: I was kind of a C student in high school,
Speaker 2: so I don't really understand a lot of these talking points.
Speaker 2: But that being said, you can understand at least an
Speaker 2: outline of what they were. Really what they are aiming
Speaker 2: for whenever you do have Kamala and Joe Biden and
Speaker 2: people like that, and you have literally people out there
Speaker 2: that are making TikTok videos of I can't believe we
Speaker 2: lect democracy go away? How could you elect Trump? And
Speaker 2: they're screaming in the fucking videos, They're crying, and they're
Speaker 2: so they're so hysterical and everything. Meanwhile, these fucking people
Speaker 2: are so manipulated. I actually feel bad for them. I
Speaker 2: don't even want to call them retarded, although I feel
Speaker 2: like saying that, but I don't want to say that
Speaker 2: because I know that it's just mass hypnosis and because
Speaker 2: they believe everything that's in the media, and they call
Speaker 2: us crazy for actually looking into things. So it's unfortunate
Speaker 2: that that's the way that it is. But at the
Speaker 2: same time, I do believe that we have a job
Speaker 2: to do, and I believe that all conspiracy theorists have
Speaker 2: a job to do, and that is to open up
Speaker 2: that third eye literally across the world, so that we
Speaker 2: cannot be manipulated, We cannot be hypnotized unless you ask
Speaker 2: me for one, and you you can actually, you know,
Speaker 2: get a good understanding of what's going on in the
Speaker 2: world without having fucking don Lemon tell you what it is.
Speaker 1: I mean, yes, agreed one hundred percent. By the way, it's.
Speaker 3: This whole thing when you look at it on the surface, yeah,
Speaker 3: okay for the business side of it, the economics side
Speaker 3: of it. But then your boy broke it down. There
Speaker 3: was too much democracy. We couldn't allow that. It was
Speaker 3: shifting the balance of powers on the global scale, not
Speaker 3: just the local government scale of which country's got the
Speaker 3: biggest dick. It was changing the entire balance of power,
Speaker 3: and they couldn't have that. You look at that and
Speaker 3: you think, okay, so that's going to be in all
Speaker 3: of the cabinets.
Speaker 1: That's gonna be what it's making business moves happen. But
Speaker 1: just throwing it out. What about war?
Speaker 3: How many of the wars have been caused because of
Speaker 3: trilateral and or center for for yeah, foreign relations moves
Speaker 3: or decisions that were made right like, hey, how about
Speaker 3: all of you start investing in this kind of a
Speaker 3: cururrency because that country's about to go into a war
Speaker 3: and it's all going to plummet or do options against it,
Speaker 3: and you'll skyrocket and then buy a while it's low
Speaker 3: and then ride the inflation up it's there's so many
Speaker 3: ways they could do this to whear international banking, international business, Like,
Speaker 3: there's ways of padding the books and padding the deck
Speaker 3: to where it's just money making handover fists.
Speaker 2: I mean, dude, whenever we talk about the military industrial complex,
Speaker 2: it is a real thing. And from the from just
Speaker 2: the little bit that we learned about the Trilateral Commission
Speaker 2: and all of these fucking brotherhoods of global elitists, sure
Speaker 2: they kind of seemed to be controlling.
Speaker 3: It, didn't We just hear that they had a Boeing
Speaker 3: guy in the Trilateral Commission?
Speaker 5: Yep?
Speaker 3: Then we find out our current Secretary of Defense was
Speaker 3: a board member for raytheon up until he took over
Speaker 3: in the as a sect death, and it's like, wait
Speaker 3: a minute, how did that happen?
Speaker 1: Trilateral Commission? See far, that's that's how.
Speaker 2: These people are playing both sides, bro. And that's you know,
Speaker 2: we said it before about people who are working for
Speaker 2: Pfizer and also the World Health Organization, right, And so
Speaker 2: it's so clutch that Bobby Kennedy is getting on that too.
Speaker 2: You know, he's basically, dude, he's trying to outlaw pharmaceutical commercials,
Speaker 2: which I think is awesome.
Speaker 1: Yes it is. I mean we're one of the only
Speaker 1: countries that allows that.
Speaker 2: Dude, us in New Zealand. That's it.
Speaker 3: Like the doctors who are the professionals in that field
Speaker 3: should be in the know of what the latest and
Speaker 3: greatest type of drug information should be. I mean, yes,
Speaker 3: I think people should be informed about it. But you
Speaker 3: shouldn't be bombarded with advertisements telling you that you need
Speaker 3: to get on this new type of anti depression mid
Speaker 3: and this and this, like, No, you should talk to
Speaker 3: your medical professional and they should prescribe you something.
Speaker 1: That's how that's supposed to work.
Speaker 2: I mean, how many people listen to a pharmaceutical commercial
Speaker 2: and then go up to their doctor and say, can
Speaker 2: I get that? Can I get this? Be honest, like
Speaker 2: most of the commercials you're talking about literally the tiniest
Speaker 2: percentage of people have those kinds of problems.
Speaker 3: Right like growing up all right, daytime televit watching Cartoon Network,
Speaker 3: mill of summer.
Speaker 1: Just what's on TV? If I if you have diabetes?
Speaker 3: Bro, how many kids during summer break at noon watching
Speaker 3: Cartoon Network? Do you think you're reaching with this old
Speaker 3: man talking about diabetes?
Speaker 7: Like?
Speaker 1: Yeah, is this about you know? What I mean.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I always thought that was pretty strange as well.
Speaker 2: But that's just diabetes I'm talking about. There's a bunch
Speaker 2: of other shit that, like I swear, they make up diseases.
Speaker 3: I mean maybe maybe, but it's like that's just the
Speaker 3: newest drug and they're just paying the money to get
Speaker 3: it out there, and it's like, I don't know, I
Speaker 3: would love to know what the turnaround rate is for that,
Speaker 3: Like how many of these people on prescriptions heard about
Speaker 3: it from a commercial.
Speaker 2: I can't imagine that. It's a lot, dude.
Speaker 3: I can't either, But you and I also look at
Speaker 3: the world through a different lens, Dude.
Speaker 1: Maybe like the NPCs out they're not our good cult members.
Speaker 1: Of course, these people are people right our tribe or
Speaker 1: colts if you will. These people look at things for
Speaker 1: what they are. But I'm wondering how many MPC types
Speaker 1: out there, like, huh, yeah, I do need to get
Speaker 1: on a different anxiety medication.
Speaker 2: I don't know, man, it is pretty wild.
Speaker 1: Dude.
Speaker 2: By the way, we had referenced old boy and the
Speaker 2: guy who never really agrees with him. On the other thing,
Speaker 2: I said that I wanted to mention a quote from
Speaker 2: Barry Goldwater as well. Yeah, whenever he was talking about
Speaker 2: the Trilateral Commission. He said this in his book called
Speaker 2: With No Apologies. Now, this guy he used to be
Speaker 2: He was a US senator and he wrote this book
Speaker 2: in nineteen sixty four. But this is a quote from
Speaker 2: his book on the Trilateral Commission. He goes, the Trilateral
Speaker 2: Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation
Speaker 2: of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of
Speaker 2: the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission
Speaker 2: represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate
Speaker 2: the force centers political of political power, of political power,
Speaker 2: monetary use, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends
Speaker 2: to create is a worldwide economic power superior to the
Speaker 2: political governments of the nation states involved as managers and
Speaker 2: creators of the system, they will rule the future.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's wild.
Speaker 3: But what do you mean by ecclesiastical or is he
Speaker 3: saying that the Pope is also involved in the Trilateral Commission?
Speaker 2: Could be basically, I think what he was trying to
Speaker 2: say is what the other gentleman was also saying, is
Speaker 2: that basically to have control not only in the school system,
Speaker 2: not only in the government, but also even in the church.
Speaker 2: He did mention that. And so I've been saying this, dude,
Speaker 2: I've been saying this, you go to church, there's not
Speaker 2: really a whole lot you're going to learn if you
Speaker 2: go to a big, mega church. And I'm not talking about.
Speaker 1: You're really not I'm not gonna lie to you.
Speaker 2: Know how many fucking people I know that go to
Speaker 2: church every single Sunday and I asked them a question
Speaker 2: and they have no idea what the fuck I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: It's like they need to go to a church that
Speaker 1: teaches rather than a fucking chicken soup for the soul house.
Speaker 2: Which is every megachurch that you've ever been to. That's
Speaker 2: fair Like literally like I went to and I and
Speaker 2: I told you know, uh Luisa about this as well,
Speaker 2: because she goes to like a Baptist church and I
Speaker 2: went with her like like a year or two ago
Speaker 2: to it was like an Easter wan er something. I
Speaker 2: think it was an Easter service. But I went there, dude,
Speaker 2: I swear, I literally they were just singing the whole
Speaker 2: fucking time. I was like, who's learning it?
Speaker 3: It's a holiday's service, like a Christmas or Easter. That's
Speaker 3: pretty much all it's gonna be.
Speaker 2: I think it was leading up to Easter. I don't
Speaker 2: know if it was on Easter, so I don't know
Speaker 2: if it was on Sunday, but it was a holiday
Speaker 2: like that, and yeah it was. It was you know,
Speaker 2: holiday themed and stuff like that. But literally he read
Speaker 2: the pastor or the priest whatever he is. He read
Speaker 2: literally one Bible verse, that's it. And it was like,
Speaker 2: you know, Jesus died for your sins or some bullshit.
Speaker 2: It's like, teach me something.
Speaker 3: I don't love how you shit all over my actual
Speaker 3: religion to my face.
Speaker 1: It's crazy.
Speaker 2: No, no, I'm not shitting on it. I'm just saying say.
Speaker 1: Something that you don't learn anything at church. It's like, ah,
Speaker 1: respectfully disagree.
Speaker 2: Oh is that where you learned everything that you know
Speaker 2: of the Bible?
Speaker 1: No, it's where I learned the basics of it, though,
Speaker 1: for sure.
Speaker 2: That's what I'm saying, people learn it. That's what I'm
Speaker 2: saying is is that most people only learn the basics
Speaker 2: because they repeat the basics in these churches. And that's
Speaker 2: what this guy was saying, is that you're not learning
Speaker 2: actually what's in the Bible. You only learn the basics. Now,
Speaker 2: to most people, that's enough, but shouldn't be. Well, that's
Speaker 2: all I'm trying to say is it's just like a
Speaker 2: fun gathering. You're not actually there to learn anything. I
Speaker 2: don't know, that's just my point of view. I used
Speaker 2: to go to church to try and learn things. Other
Speaker 2: people like to go to church for other reasons. And
Speaker 2: by no means was I trying to shit on you.
Speaker 2: And I didn't mean to say some bullshit like Jesus
Speaker 2: died for your sense. I didn't mean every.
Speaker 3: Time you mentioned in the Bible it's like or you know,
Speaker 3: the bullshit in it. It's like, where is there bullshit
Speaker 3: in the Bible? Well, you know it's like, no, I don't.
Speaker 2: I meant it as bullshit in the sense of, you know,
Speaker 2: you hear this thing every single time.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, yeah, you.
Speaker 3: Got the pastors that are just they're they're renting and
Speaker 3: repeating the same old messages.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: But it's like, yeah, if you're just going to church
Speaker 3: and you're or any it doesn't have to just be Christianity,
Speaker 3: any house of worship where you're going there and doing
Speaker 3: the same song and dance over and over again, and
Speaker 3: like that's it. That's like trying to form a relationship
Speaker 3: by walking up to somebody and introducing yourself every single
Speaker 3: day and that's it, Like Hi, my name is Jacob
Speaker 3: and walking away and then doing that every single day. Yo,
Speaker 3: How like tight do you think you and that person
Speaker 3: are going to be after doing that every day for
Speaker 3: ten years?
Speaker 2: Yes?
Speaker 1: Like that's not a relationship.
Speaker 2: A death right. It's like you know, off of fifty
Speaker 2: first dates. Hi, I'm Tom. Hi, I'm Tom. It's just
Speaker 2: the same thing over and over again. And if you
Speaker 2: like that, if you find that to be like a
Speaker 2: good part of your life. I'm not hating on it.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying that if the church has been infiltrated
Speaker 2: by such organizations to keep you at a minimalistic understanding
Speaker 2: of what your beliefs are, you could see how that
Speaker 2: could be manipulation, right, I.
Speaker 3: Could see how for instance, and again this didn't like
Speaker 3: to shit on Catholics by any means, but an example
Speaker 3: of this would be, how like the current pope is
Speaker 3: taking way more political stances than what a pope should
Speaker 3: be taking. That could be a idea that possibly they
Speaker 3: have infiltrated the church. That's a thought process anyway, the
Speaker 3: same way that Russian Orthodoxy is super pro putin and
Speaker 3: very Ukraine is being ran by demonic forces right now,
Speaker 3: I would say that would be a version of politics
Speaker 3: infiltrating the church.
Speaker 2: And as they say, the word is the word yesterday,
Speaker 2: it is today, it will always be right. It's not
Speaker 2: supposed to change, but certain people like to progress it
Speaker 2: in certain sensus. I'm not saying that it's wrong or right.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying, if you got to look at why
Speaker 2: these things are happening, who is who is really setting
Speaker 2: these things in motion?
Speaker 1: One hundred percent?
Speaker 3: And I mean you also look at in America after
Speaker 3: nine to eleven, there were tons of churches that were
Speaker 3: preaching pro war movements. Because of that, there's an argument
Speaker 3: to be said that they were being infiltrated by certain
Speaker 3: government powers that wanted America to be in a very
Speaker 3: pro war.
Speaker 1: Headspace and culture at that time. Look, I don't know.
Speaker 3: Maybe they were reading the room and they were giving
Speaker 3: sermons to their people based off what they felt they
Speaker 3: needed to hear.
Speaker 1: Maybe they were kind of being pushed in a certain direction. Look,
Speaker 1: who knows, who knows I.
Speaker 2: Mean, how about the churches that were all praise God
Speaker 2: for giving us a vaccine to this sickness, death, this,
Speaker 2: you know what I mean? It was like, what are
Speaker 2: you talking about? Who's paying you.
Speaker 1: To say this? Perfect example? Now?
Speaker 3: Is it possible if that passor was just going a
Speaker 3: little crazy, they had set the kool aid a little
Speaker 3: too hard and they were now preaching false doctrine to
Speaker 3: their people and it wasn't a k Yeah, that's possible.
Speaker 3: Is it equally possible that person was being guided in
Speaker 3: the message to be pushed to their congregation?
Speaker 1: Equally possible?
Speaker 16: You know?
Speaker 2: There was I can't remember his first name, something Lori,
Speaker 2: who is the director? He was the director and writer
Speaker 2: of like two and a half Men, and what's the
Speaker 2: smart guy? Benjamin Young Benjamin or Young Sheldon Young? Sheldon? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 2: And the show that it came from. I never watched it,
Speaker 2: Big Bang Theory, right, like that guy, he created a
Speaker 2: lot of shows something damn, I can't remember his full name,
Speaker 2: Jeff Lori or something like that, or Hugh Lorie, I
Speaker 2: think something. But he said it was very interesting. He
Speaker 2: goes every morning I wake up and I go to
Speaker 2: a specific mailbox in Hollywood and he goes, I don't
Speaker 2: know who that letter's coming from. I don't know who
Speaker 2: put it there. I don't know where. You know, it's
Speaker 2: it's basically a letter that is basically saying that in
Speaker 2: each one of his episodes he needs to bring up
Speaker 2: certain things, right like certain Yeah, dude, it's crazy, Like
Speaker 2: he literally he came out and said that, and he
Speaker 2: was like, you know, I don't know who these people are,
Speaker 2: but they're the ones that are paying me. They're the
Speaker 2: ones that are telling me to kind of subconsciously put
Speaker 2: these things in these TV shows.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's kind of sketch. Dude.
Speaker 2: Holy fuck, I'm telling you, dude, there are way way
Speaker 2: more people controlling every single bit of information that you
Speaker 2: consume than you think, even in the Big Bang fucking Theory,
Speaker 2: even in Little Sheldon or whatever the fuck.
Speaker 3: It's like, I mean, we kind of knew that was happening,
Speaker 3: but for it to be overtly, like admitted to to
Speaker 3: that level of full and just a letter every day
Speaker 3: and it just tells me what to do and I
Speaker 3: just go for it.
Speaker 1: And it's like, wait, bro, what like that? I can't
Speaker 1: believe he said that out loud.
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah, well, actually he wrote it. It was I
Speaker 2: can't remember at the end of which show. It might
Speaker 2: have been at the end of a two and a
Speaker 2: half Men, because what he used to do is that
Speaker 2: he would write like a little like a little paragraph
Speaker 2: of something funny at the end of each one of
Speaker 2: these videos, right or at the end of each one
Speaker 2: of these shows of two and a half men and
Speaker 2: stuff like that. And at the end of this one
Speaker 2: specifically was saying about you know the letter in the mailbox. No, no,
Speaker 2: not knowing where it came from, but it was he
Speaker 2: was supposed to put in key phrases and key things
Speaker 2: to make the show about this in order to put
Speaker 2: it in the public opinion and in the public subconscious
Speaker 2: and shit like that. I was like, I mean, he's
Speaker 2: that was years ago. I just remembered it.
Speaker 1: Am I honestly I never heard about that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, pretty wild shit. So and I don't I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: I feel bad. I feel bad for phrasing it the
Speaker 2: way that I did, because I really don't mean to
Speaker 2: shit on your beliefs. Dude, I'm not gonna lie to you.
Speaker 2: As soon as I came out of that DMT trip,
Speaker 2: I'm like, I'm like dude, I never want to shit
Speaker 2: on anybody's beliefs because I think that it is so
Speaker 2: foundational to everybody's being honestly like it is, so I
Speaker 2: just want to throw it out.
Speaker 1: There are good, dud.
Speaker 2: As long as you don't say that I'm talking to
Speaker 2: the devil with Tarot cards anymore. Just don't do that.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying you are or are not. That's not
Speaker 1: for me to say, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2: No, it's not as long. I mean, you can say
Speaker 2: whatever you want. Those are your beliefs. But anyway, look,
Speaker 2: I wanted to bring up the Trilateral Commission. We've talked
Speaker 2: about getting into these certain sectors of who's controlling everything.
Speaker 2: We got into the APAC before, and a couple of
Speaker 2: other government organizations that were funding these people to rise
Speaker 2: them up to the top so they would get the
Speaker 2: mouse amount of eyes and everything on them. So it
Speaker 2: does start to make sense. Whenever you literally see everybody
Speaker 2: gunning after Trump, it's not because he's such a terrible person,
Speaker 2: because I don't believe that he is. Maybe he used
Speaker 2: to be a scumbag, fucking businessman whatever, Like, I don't care.
Speaker 2: He wasn't the leader of the country at that time.
Speaker 1: You know what I'm saying, He wasn't one of the
Speaker 1: faceless people pulling the strings on the actual government. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he might have been just like a greaseball businessman, but like, okay,
Speaker 1: he was very clear and open it with that. By
Speaker 1: the way, like that's never been a misunderstood thing. And
Speaker 1: that's the point. He's not an enemy of America. He's
Speaker 1: an enemy of the establishment that has been running politics
Speaker 1: and running global change for decades. He goes against the
Speaker 1: status quo.
Speaker 3: He's not related, right, He's not related to all the
Speaker 3: other presidents, like all these other ones are, is he?
Speaker 2: I think he actually is.
Speaker 1: Oh shit, that's right.
Speaker 3: I thought he was the first one that wasn't because
Speaker 3: everybody thought Obama was. Come to find out he and
Speaker 3: Bush were like fourth cousins. So then it was like
Speaker 3: Trump was the first one that wasn't. But shit, he
Speaker 3: is connected, didn't he?
Speaker 7: Now?
Speaker 17: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Yeah he is. And by the way, you know who
Speaker 2: wasn't related Kamala. So it's kind of like a weird
Speaker 2: change of events, right, Oh, how the turntables? Yeah, it's
Speaker 2: pretty crazy.
Speaker 3: She was not connected to any of it because she's
Speaker 3: basically a foreign parentage both sides.
Speaker 2: They lied about her family tree through and through. I mean,
Speaker 2: I mean they.
Speaker 1: Lied about Obama's too, but somehow that got pushed under
Speaker 1: the rug that too.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but look, yeah, I just wanted to bring it up.
Speaker 2: And y'all, I mean, obviously, I can only do so
Speaker 2: much research, I can only read so much of this information,
Speaker 2: and to be honest, I mean, look, I'm just one
Speaker 2: guy kind of trying to put things together, and so
Speaker 2: I wanted to use this episode to influence all the
Speaker 2: good cult members out there to do a little bit
Speaker 2: more research. You want to try and find out who
Speaker 2: else is in on this commission and really the people
Speaker 2: who are controlling the world. And it did make me
Speaker 2: feel good because at the end, I didn't know, like
Speaker 2: that was like one of the last things that I
Speaker 2: brought up, that Trump had nothing to do with the
Speaker 2: Trilateral Commission. I was like, all right, maybe we're not
Speaker 2: being manipulated. Maybe he actually is a man for the people.
Speaker 2: And you know, it makes you feel good.
Speaker 3: There's so much evidence to say that that's what's actually
Speaker 3: happening here. And as much as people want to shit
Speaker 3: on him and call him, you know, possibly just like
Speaker 3: the dictator that brings the whole house of cards coming down,
Speaker 3: or some sort of possible evil religious figure like Look,
Speaker 3: I don't know. I can't say for sure if that's
Speaker 3: a truth or not, but I have to say, with
Speaker 3: all the evidence that's been compiled in his favor, it's
Speaker 3: kind of overwhelming from my perspective.
Speaker 1: But again, I'm just one guy.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna be real with you. I'd rather him be
Speaker 2: controlled by the Jews than by the Trilateral Commission. I'm
Speaker 2: just gonna say it.
Speaker 1: Damn, dude, heard.
Speaker 3: I mean, who's to say that that's not actually who's
Speaker 3: controlling the Trilateral Commission?
Speaker 17: Die?
Speaker 2: I guess you could.
Speaker 1: Maybe he just cut out the middleman.
Speaker 2: Was Rockefeller or a Jew?
Speaker 1: Oh, I'm sure somebody's gonna say that. But the fact
Speaker 1: of the matter is that even if he wasn't, his
Speaker 1: dad was only able to make the deals that he
Speaker 1: was going to the Rothschild's for the gold because America
Speaker 1: at the time was gold backed and they needed it.
Speaker 1: The only person that could bankroll their gold investment for
Speaker 1: the entire nation was your boy Rockefeller. And when that
Speaker 1: time came, there was only one family on earth that
Speaker 1: was not only in control of the mining and the
Speaker 1: ship and the value of gold. They were the one
Speaker 1: stop shop for it all, and for the first time ever,
Speaker 1: an American was able to have that conversation with Europeans.
Speaker 1: Up until that point, there was no American wealthy enough
Speaker 1: to step up to that particular table for that conversation.
Speaker 2: You know, Oh yeah, yeah, okay. Look at this old
Speaker 2: fuck Now this is obviously before he died.
Speaker 1: He died.
Speaker 3: I thought that was George Soros for a fucking second time.
Speaker 3: You know where you're going, and it's correct.
Speaker 1: Dude, that's weird, is.
Speaker 2: It not one of these strangers? Look at this shit, bro,
Speaker 2: tell me which one's which.
Speaker 1: It's the same picture.
Speaker 2: Oh my god, look at his eyes. I don't believe
Speaker 2: in demons, but he kind of looks like one.
Speaker 3: Age is a fickle mistress dog. Some people age like
Speaker 3: a fine wine, and some people just look like a
Speaker 3: bag of fucking, fleshy, dirty laundry at the end of
Speaker 3: it all.
Speaker 2: Oh my god, it's it's disgusting.
Speaker 1: But look at him though, that's that is Rockefeller and
Speaker 1: that is Soros. They they do favor each other.
Speaker 2: Honestly, damn dude. David Rockefeller Senior lived until he was
Speaker 2: one hundred and one years old.
Speaker 3: Yeah, these rich people are known for their longevity. Same
Speaker 3: with the Rothschilds. Remember your boy Jacob Rothschild dying in
Speaker 3: his seventies was like crazy, Like the fact that he
Speaker 3: didn't live into his nineties was like fucking wild.
Speaker 2: Look at George Soros.
Speaker 1: He's ninety four, dude, yep, still stirring that pot amazing,
Speaker 1: still throwing money to incite violence and riots and all
Speaker 1: the things, trying to topple the whole the whole world.
Speaker 3: You know, he just he never really could leave behind
Speaker 3: his his hitler youth upbringing.
Speaker 10: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, damn, I wish I could find that. Uh. Oh,
Speaker 2: it says it will be tough for opponents to overcome
Speaker 2: the procedural hurdles that insulate China's president, but this power
Speaker 2: can be dimmed. Oh so, I'm guessing George Soros was
Speaker 2: trying to get Jijaping out of office, and that's possibly
Speaker 2: what led to Jijaping saying George Soros is one of
Speaker 2: the most evil people to ever live.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's a true statement. I don't think that's crazy.
Speaker 3: Then when you see that Hillary Clinton, excuse me, killery,
Speaker 3: Uh was you literally looking to him as a mentor.
Speaker 1: And then you find out, if for nothing.
Speaker 3: Else, to find out his past in Nazi Germany, and
Speaker 3: then to find out that Killary called him a mentor
Speaker 3: alongside a long time clansman that she also called a mentor,
Speaker 3: And like that alone tells me everything I needed to
Speaker 3: know about him as a person. But then you look
Speaker 3: at his long track record of investments and political funding
Speaker 3: and like things that he's tried to push and implement
Speaker 3: and lobby for, and it's like, yeah, you know, he's
Speaker 3: kind of pretty much anti American.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it seems like it, dude. All right, So I
Speaker 2: did want to go I forgot I wanted to go
Speaker 2: back to the Trilateral Commission website. Yeah, dude, check this
Speaker 2: out right at the top of their page, the Task
Speaker 2: Force on Global Capitalism and Transition.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, no, that's that's.
Speaker 2: Enticing, says the Trilateral Commission, convened in twenty twenty one
Speaker 2: distinguished business leaders, scholars and policymakers from around the world
Speaker 2: in its Task Force on Global Capitalism and Transition. The
Speaker 2: time was right for this effort. Capitalism or market based
Speaker 2: economies are at a historic transition point. Right after COVID
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty one right or really during. It says
Speaker 2: capitalism's positive impact on prosperity and well being is unmatched. Nonetheless,
Speaker 2: many people are frustrated today by its inability to handle
Speaker 2: some of the greatest challenges facing society. They there are
Speaker 2: growing concerns about whether market based economies will be able
Speaker 2: to address three major challenges. First, climate change. That's the first.
Speaker 2: That's the first. Major challenges climate change, first, all of
Speaker 2: the gate.
Speaker 1: We gotta talk about global warming for sure.
Speaker 2: Second, the disruptions triggered by the digital revolution, probably talking
Speaker 2: about cryptocurrency.
Speaker 1: Uh huh.
Speaker 2: And Third, rising inequalities. It says this report represents the
Speaker 2: culmination of this trilateral effort to understand these challenges and
Speaker 2: chart a path forward. This report calls for a new
Speaker 2: quote unquote social compact with the next generations. This compact
Speaker 2: prioritizes equality of opportunity. The report does not offer one
Speaker 2: size fits all solutions. Rather, it suggests an overall direction
Speaker 2: for governments, businesses, and nonprofit institutions and specific steps that
Speaker 2: they can take to achieve critical common goals. Okay, so
Speaker 2: it only suggests an overall direction for governments. It only
Speaker 2: suggests it. You know what we're gonna.
Speaker 1: Really think tank. Dude, they don't like do stuff.
Speaker 2: We're going to really suggest things really hard. With over
Speaker 2: a hundred of our fucking members on your uh, on
Speaker 2: your presidential administration, right.
Speaker 3: And all of them on whatever side of it are
Speaker 3: all saying the same thing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, eventually, it's gonna seep in.
Speaker 2: Yeah, buddy, the exception shit honestly, yeah, I mean it's
Speaker 2: literally they just eating us from within. It's like the
Speaker 2: fucking enemy is at your doorstep, you know.
Speaker 1: Wow, dude, look at this.
Speaker 2: The task force. Look at this fucking guy with his glasses.
Speaker 1: Dude. Do they say what these people are? I see names,
Speaker 1: but they do. Do they talk about who they are
Speaker 1: on the outside of this task force?
Speaker 2: Well, the one guy whose name is Vladimir Louhi, president
Speaker 2: of the Czech Chamber of Converse and an international advisor
Speaker 2: at Goldman Sachs.
Speaker 1: Okay international banking advisor.
Speaker 2: Awesome. How about Makiko Eda, who is the Chief Representative
Speaker 2: Officer of the World Economic Forum in.
Speaker 1: Japan, Okay, another heavy hitter on this task force?
Speaker 2: Yeah, buddy. Then you have John Bruton, who is the
Speaker 2: former Prime Minister of Ireland.
Speaker 1: Okay, that's I mean Ireland's kind of a famously neutral country,
Speaker 1: but even still Prime Minister. It's not a position to
Speaker 1: stick your nose up at these.
Speaker 2: Andrew Erdman, who is the Senior Advisor Task Force on
Speaker 2: Global Capitalism, and he's the former COO of the State
Speaker 2: of Missouri. They have coos or it's a comma. Then
Speaker 2: state of Missouri. Okay, so he's from the state of
Speaker 2: Missouri'm tripping.
Speaker 1: Okay, I want to say they. I didn't know Missouri
Speaker 1: was listed as a business that needed a COO. But
Speaker 1: all right.
Speaker 2: Then you have Sigmar Gabriel, who is the former Foreign
Speaker 2: Minister of Germany.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: Who else do we have here? Akin Nari Horri, who
Speaker 2: is the Special Advisor and member of the Board of
Speaker 2: Directors of the Canon Institute for Global Studies in Tokyo.
Speaker 2: He's the Asia Pacific Treasurer in the TRY and UH
Speaker 2: and also in the Trilateral Commission obviously. Okay, Oh, how
Speaker 2: about this Melody Hobson, who's the board chair of or
Speaker 2: he holds she holds a board chair of Starbucks. Oh wow,
Speaker 2: Oh you'll like this one. Marilyn Adams Houston, former chairman,
Speaker 2: president and CEO of Lockheed Martin.
Speaker 3: Okay, military industrial complex has made their way into this
Speaker 3: task force.
Speaker 1: Excellent.
Speaker 2: Wow, you got this guy, Lawrence Lowe who uh he
Speaker 2: was the former president of the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Speaker 2: You have uh Bill A. Horry Kusick Kusick Can who
Speaker 2: is the the former Permanent Secretary the Minister Ministry of
Speaker 2: Foreign Affairs in Singapore.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: Cecilia Malmstrom who he was? She was the former European
Speaker 2: Commissioner for Trade and the European Commission in Brussels.
Speaker 1: That's kind of a big one, the Commissioner for all
Speaker 1: European Trade.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah. Then you got James Manyika who uh he
Speaker 2: was the senior or he is the Senior VP of
Speaker 2: Technology and Society at Google.
Speaker 1: Oh wow, dude, Yo, who's homeboy with the crazy hair?
Speaker 2: Which one is the one with the crazy hair?
Speaker 1: Bottom? Right?
Speaker 2: Oh he looks like a fucking penis ad dude.
Speaker 1: That's what I'm saying. Why boy would the coconut hair? Dude?
Speaker 3: Like, no one has like put him in front of
Speaker 3: a mirror. He has he has no idea he's walking
Speaker 3: around looking like this clearly.
Speaker 2: Oh he has a lot of titles. He was the
Speaker 2: chairman of the i n G Group. He uh. He
Speaker 2: was a member of the supervisory board at how Holding,
Speaker 2: a member of the European Advisory Panel of Tema, Temesk, Temasek. Okay,
Speaker 2: there we go. The former deputy chairman of Royal Dutch Shell,
Speaker 2: former chairman of the supervisory board of Heineken, the former
Speaker 2: non executive director of Glatzo Smith Klein in London, former
Speaker 2: chairman and CEO of Azo Nobel, and former Dutch Minister
Speaker 2: for Economic Affairs.
Speaker 1: Okay, so real quick with all of that. Your boy
Speaker 1: couldn't hire one image consultant, like one even one time,
Speaker 1: Like just take a selfie of yourself and and send
Speaker 1: it to somebody be like, hey, new haircut, what do
Speaker 1: you think?
Speaker 3: And like just take whatever the fuck they say next,
Speaker 3: very seriously. Like he never did that one time and
Speaker 3: was able to accomplish all of that. Okay, Your boys
Speaker 3: just like operating to the beat of his own drum.
Speaker 3: And then he just fell in lockstep with these people
Speaker 3: and like, hey, he's he's on team a team Trilateral
Speaker 3: Commission these days, on this special task force.
Speaker 2: His wife must hate him, because I'm sure he's asked her,
Speaker 2: does this haircut make me look like a dick, and
Speaker 2: she's probably said, no, honey, you look like a sweet angel.
Speaker 3: Nah, dude, she's like five hundred pounds and she's happy
Speaker 3: as fuck that he walks around like that because there's like,
Speaker 3: I mean, I don't know, because when you're rolling like
Speaker 3: that type of success. He could buy women if he wanted,
Speaker 3: but like, there's a lesser chance of a woman making
Speaker 3: a plate for him while he's walking around like that haircut?
Speaker 2: Right, yeah, what was that?
Speaker 3: What was that show with your boy that had no neck?
Speaker 3: That like, uh, you're my best view in the little
Speaker 3: Filipino chickens?
Speaker 1: Like et what was that? Love is blind level in
Speaker 1: the spectrum? But oh, is it thy fiance? One of
Speaker 1: these fucking ridiculous reality shows.
Speaker 2: I don't want that crap.
Speaker 3: Ah that looks like that guy, like he would try
Speaker 3: to go and buy some like you know, Ukrainian mail
Speaker 3: order bride and.
Speaker 1: The whole time she's just be like, duh, yes, it
Speaker 1: was so sexy, Yes, yes, baby, and like would just
Speaker 1: go and blow all his money for him. That looks
Speaker 1: like he looks like a cook.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, oh for sure, he's definitely.
Speaker 3: He absolutely sits in the corner of the hotel room
Speaker 3: and watches some like twenty two year old model get
Speaker 3: railed out like that's this guy?
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, dude, he's he's probably like you know, underneath
Speaker 2: the bed, just getting poked in the face with the
Speaker 2: mattress helping the liquid seep through.
Speaker 1: Look at his face. He's got like all that pride,
Speaker 1: but also you can see deep seated shame in his eyes.
Speaker 1: I could see it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he definitely looks like a like a turd eater.
Speaker 3: Like he's not happy, but he's like he's he's satisfied
Speaker 3: with being beta and he's okay with that.
Speaker 2: He's been golden showered a number of times.
Speaker 1: Oh no doubt. Oh this dude has absolutely taken it
Speaker 1: directly to the face before for sure.
Speaker 2: Then all right, so then you get to this woman
Speaker 2: down here.
Speaker 1: With one title who's just like just chilling.
Speaker 2: Oh it ain't just one title though, she's the former
Speaker 2: Prime Minister of Denmark.
Speaker 1: Oh shit, Now one title carried weight with it, dude.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, hella, h e ll e. What a name. Okay,
Speaker 2: hella Hella Thorning Schmidt. So these are still all the
Speaker 2: people that are on the Trilateral Commission currently.
Speaker 1: Uh well, this is just that task Force, isn't it?
Speaker 1: Or is this the entirety of the Trilateral Commission.
Speaker 2: That's just the task force, bro, Yeah, yeah, just the
Speaker 2: task force. So yeah, you, I mean, it's pretty pretty heavy,
Speaker 2: heavy list of uh people that are fighting for this
Speaker 2: kind of nonsense.
Speaker 1: Oh they're hitters, for sure, These aren't. These aren't just
Speaker 1: average joes that you know, were out there for no reason.
Speaker 7: Like.
Speaker 3: These are big time players in the global economic and
Speaker 3: political sphere.
Speaker 2: No doubt, dude. So yeah, then you have these people,
Speaker 2: the CEO of Suntory Holdings, the former US chair and
Speaker 2: managing partner and America's managing partner.
Speaker 1: Okay, that seemed like a repetitive title, but al right
Speaker 1: it did.
Speaker 2: And then you got Carl Bilt who is the co
Speaker 2: chair of the European Council on Foreign Relations.
Speaker 1: And those are the task co chairs damn.
Speaker 2: So the European Council on Foreign Relations. So he's the
Speaker 2: co chair of a CFR and the Trilateral Commission. That's
Speaker 2: a double banger.
Speaker 1: That guy's kind of critical.
Speaker 2: It's his name, Carl Built Bildt.
Speaker 1: I feel like we need to do a whole deep
Speaker 1: dive on your boy, Carlito over here, bro.
Speaker 2: Well here it is.
Speaker 1: Oh shit.
Speaker 2: Carl Built is co chair of the European Council on
Speaker 2: Foreign Relations, contributing columnist to Washington Post. Oh how about
Speaker 2: that Wow, as well as columnists for Project Syndicate. He
Speaker 2: serves as senior advisor to the Wallenberg Foundations in Sweden
Speaker 2: and is on the board of Trustees of the Rand
Speaker 2: Corporation in the United States.
Speaker 3: Okay, the Rand Corporation. Excellent call out for this guy.
Speaker 3: Let's keep going.
Speaker 2: He has served as both Prime Minister and Foreign Minister
Speaker 2: of Sweden. Holy shit, this guy. Okay, Carl Bilt who
Speaker 2: was appointed by the WHO Special Envoy the WHO World
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, the World Health Organization Special Envoy for the
Speaker 2: access to COVID nineteen tools accelerator.
Speaker 1: So this guy was a key player during COVID with
Speaker 1: the WHO.
Speaker 2: All right, Holy God. Subsequently, he served in international functions
Speaker 2: with the EU and the UN, primarily related to the
Speaker 2: conflicts in the Balkans. He was co chairman of the
Speaker 2: Dayton Peace Talks on Bosnia and became the first high
Speaker 2: representative in the country. Later, he was the Special envoy
Speaker 2: of UN Secretary General Kofi Annan to the region.
Speaker 1: I don't know what kofe anonim was, but all right,
Speaker 1: me neither.
Speaker 2: But that is a pretty interesting resume.
Speaker 3: See, yeah, your boy has been around the block and
Speaker 3: he's locked in. He's what we call a vested member
Speaker 3: to the global elite.
Speaker 2: Oh look, they have a Henry Kissinger tribute video down
Speaker 2: here too. Shut up, yeah, buddy.
Speaker 3: Oh bro, let's we simply must Henry Kissinger, who like
Speaker 3: was one of the biggest pieces of this shit, stirred
Speaker 3: the pot, consistently did underhanded wheeling and dealing things, instrumental
Speaker 3: with Watergate, instrumental with the Vietnam War, instrumental with LBJ, Like,
Speaker 3: I mean, how far.
Speaker 1: Back and far forward do you want to go with
Speaker 1: this guy? And they have a tribute video to him.
Speaker 2: Well he's I mean, yeah, it was David Rockefeller that
Speaker 2: basically started this, but it was really like all set
Speaker 2: up by Kissinger. This is Kissinger's baby, is the Triantlateral Commission.
Speaker 1: Oh dude, that means say no more, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. But let's see what they say about their
Speaker 1: father in all this.
Speaker 2: All right, this is going to be hilarious.
Speaker 18: Doctor Kissinger. You have done many things over the course
Speaker 18: of your long career that have really defined what true
Speaker 18: diplomacy means. But you've also built great institutions, and the
Speaker 18: Trilateral Commission is certainly among them. We acknowledge you and
Speaker 18: we celebrate you as one of our founders.
Speaker 17: The brilliant conception, successful establishment, and unique rule and bringing
Speaker 17: together North America, Europe and Japan will always be linked
Speaker 17: with your name.
Speaker 1: His strategic mind has influenced the thinking an action of American, Russian, Chinese,
Speaker 1: a Middle Eastern statesman.
Speaker 11: For all this time, I particularly want to thank you
Speaker 11: for your contributions to Trilateral.
Speaker 4: Your continued curiosity, eagerness to learn and study and put
Speaker 4: all that knowledge to use is a model for us all.
Speaker 15: I can think of no one who has both brilliantly
Speaker 15: analyzed the historical records of the great statesmen of the
Speaker 15: past and then had a great opportunity to perform the
Speaker 15: same consequential deeds in his own right and with the
Speaker 15: same superb mastery.
Speaker 17: You have always been a source of inspiration, of teaching,
Speaker 17: of perspective and the wisdom.
Speaker 13: You have been the single most influential person and on
Speaker 13: the globe. You are valued across the world.
Speaker 12: Your intellectual curiosity has inspired many generations.
Speaker 15: Thank you for being a source of inspiration for future
Speaker 15: generations of diplomats, statesmen, and world leaders.
Speaker 7: You've held practitioners of diplomacy and students like to grapple
Speaker 7: with some of the most fundamental questions of world order,
Speaker 7: and you've done so by bringing a very singular combination
Speaker 7: of historic depth and strategic council KEEUS realism.
Speaker 13: He's a good reminder of the importance of making sure
Speaker 13: that we promote democracy and also the adherence to principles.
Speaker 2: You have continued to make a significant, singular, impactful contribution
Speaker 2: to the important issues of the day in such a
Speaker 2: markable manner. Your insight and your understanding of people, of cultures,
Speaker 2: and of relations between the companies and their countries is
Speaker 2: so impactful.
Speaker 11: Henry has been a major influence on the Trilateral Commission,
Speaker 11: a major influence on my life. My message to Henry
Speaker 11: is thank you very much.
Speaker 9: In two thousand and eight, when we walk the floor
Speaker 9: of the Republican National Convention, an exuberant delegate handed him
Speaker 9: a cowboy hat. The audience quite rightly roared its approval,
Speaker 9: and then the associated press put it up on the
Speaker 9: wires within minutes.
Speaker 16: I remember the very first time we met your assistant
Speaker 16: kept coming in with messages about how this world leader,
Speaker 16: that world leader was calling you, and for everybody you said, no,
Speaker 16: I'll call them back. And then she came in with
Speaker 16: a message from Nancy. You excused yourself and took that message.
Speaker 16: It's that kind of devotion that makes you so very special.
Speaker 18: We sat next to each other for ten years on
Speaker 18: the Defense Policy Board, and a few years in he said.
Speaker 1: You're my mother.
Speaker 2: You're my youish mother.
Speaker 18: Henry, you are a valued and wonderful son.
Speaker 11: I still recall conversation we had.
Speaker 2: I said, it would have you better if you had told.
Speaker 14: Us you were a China visit in nineteen seventy one beforehand.
Speaker 2: You equipped, but will.
Speaker 7: You able to keep secrets?
Speaker 19: The speech I a member best is when he gave
Speaker 19: in Dallas years ago, in which he said that the
Speaker 19: number one question in diplomacy is this. Are we relevant
Speaker 19: to your problem? When it comes to Henry Kissinger, he
Speaker 19: always is.
Speaker 5: This past year, we had the privilege of helping to
Speaker 5: publish Henry's senior undergraduate thesis.
Speaker 7: What's so remarkable is the prescience with which it speaks
Speaker 7: to the issues of today.
Speaker 15: Alan, I really are so grateful to you and Nancy
Speaker 15: for decades of friendship.
Speaker 6: Very close friends.
Speaker 4: Those of us have known your fears. I really appreciate what.
Speaker 6: You have done.
Speaker 2: It's a privilege to join our fellow trinlateralists and thanking
Speaker 2: you for a lifetime of contributions to America and the world.
Speaker 19: Thank you, doctor Kissinger for the area of wisdom, your
Speaker 19: service to the country, your contributions to the Trilateral Commission.
Speaker 2: We okay, I can't listen to that crap anymore.
Speaker 1: We saw General Petraeus came in there and on it.
Speaker 1: That was interesting.
Speaker 2: There's actually a couple of people who I looked up
Speaker 2: who were speaking on behalf of your boy, Henry, and
Speaker 2: one of them was Larry Summers, which is pretty interesting.
Speaker 2: Larry Summers, if you don't know, is he was the
Speaker 2: seventy first United States Secretary of Treasury from ninety nine
Speaker 2: to two thousand and one and a director of the
Speaker 2: National Economic Council from two thousand and nine to twenty ten.
Speaker 1: Damn.
Speaker 2: So yeah, I think it's pretty safe to say that
Speaker 2: the Trilateral Commission has, you know, wrapped its tentacles all
Speaker 2: around our country.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's got Henry Kissinger's name all over it.
Speaker 3: Which if again no other fact was known, that would
Speaker 3: be enough for me to wash my.
Speaker 1: Hands of it and just call it a complete op.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I would have to think. So.
Speaker 1: So then you look at how many members have been
Speaker 1: cabinet members.
Speaker 2: That shit, Oh how about that? So the North American
Speaker 2: Group of the Trilateral Commission. The North American Group of
Speaker 2: the Trilateral Commission includes a maximum of eighty seven US members,
Speaker 2: twenty Canadian members, and since two thoy thirteen Mexican members member.
Speaker 2: Initially it wasn't including Mexico, yeah.
Speaker 3: Because they were seen as a third world irrelevant nation.
Speaker 3: But they've kind of come on the scene. Honestly, they
Speaker 3: have more industry booming in that country, and if they
Speaker 3: could ever get the cartels under control, they may actually
Speaker 3: have a real country on their hands.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it says. In the case of the US Group,
Speaker 2: a rotation system generally brings five to ten openings in
Speaker 2: the membership each year under the ceiling of ninety maximum people.
Speaker 2: It says a major portion of the summer annual meeting
Speaker 2: of North American Executive Committee members is devoted to consideration
Speaker 2: of US membership in vitees based on a list of
Speaker 2: candidates many times larger than the number of openings. If
Speaker 2: a member is elected or appointed to a position in
Speaker 2: the executive branch of the US US government, he or
Speaker 2: she steps down as a member. Given the Commission's unofficial character, Yeah.
Speaker 1: So they basically take a break from the Commission so
Speaker 1: they can go do their time as some sort of
Speaker 1: a political office, and then when that's up, they go
Speaker 1: back home to the to the Commission and then wait
Speaker 1: for their next rotation.
Speaker 2: Are we to actually believe that these people are they
Speaker 2: have nothing to do with the Trilateral Commission once they
Speaker 2: get into politics. Are we supposed to believe that?
Speaker 1: I don't believe that whatsoever. How are you going to
Speaker 1: be a member of the Trilateral Commission for over a
Speaker 1: decade but for four years be completely impartial and unbiased.
Speaker 2: Like no way, uh, and then go back to the
Speaker 2: Trilateral Commission after.
Speaker 3: Right, like you're going back to your job once it's
Speaker 3: all said and done. And there's only so many seats available,
Speaker 3: but those seats are filled and they make sure that
Speaker 3: they're filled with their type of people.
Speaker 2: The question to be Yeah, the question is where is
Speaker 2: your loyalty? Is it to the country, is it to
Speaker 2: supporting you know, certain policies that are for the greater
Speaker 2: good of the United States, or is it to uh
Speaker 2: promoting certain policies that are in the greater good of
Speaker 2: the globe. And it seems like these people that are
Speaker 2: on the board of almost every single president since Jimmy
Speaker 2: Carter of the seventies up until Trump and then skipped
Speaker 2: over Trump and you got over a hundred of the
Speaker 2: members with the Biden administration. Yeah, I mean, it's easy
Speaker 2: to see why they're so They made such a fucking
Speaker 2: crazy effort to get Trump out. Dude, it's such like
Speaker 2: the craziest effort. And a lot of people thought that
Speaker 2: that was just you know, that that was just TV,
Speaker 2: that's just entertainment. Trump, you know, he's in on it,
Speaker 2: like he just wants the attention. But like, I don't know,
Speaker 2: at least this proves that he's note it.
Speaker 1: When you look at the establishment, this is it. This
Speaker 1: is not this isn't.
Speaker 3: The shadow government necessarily, but this is at least a
Speaker 3: portion of it. This is the arm of it. And
Speaker 3: when you have these same three hundred people total that
Speaker 3: are just rotating into different appointed positions in government, never elected,
Speaker 3: and they all come back to home base and then
Speaker 3: get sent back out to do their work. Again, that's like,
Speaker 3: that's almost a cult in it's own regard.
Speaker 2: Honestly, Yeah, it really is. There is one more name
Speaker 2: that I wanted to bring up that was giving praise
Speaker 2: to your boy, which is Joseph nie He was one
Speaker 2: of the people that was, you know, really sucking his
Speaker 2: dick over there, Kissinger's dick.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: I saw that the name n I rung a Bell
Speaker 3: because I was thinking, like, huh is that Bill and
Speaker 3: NY's brother?
Speaker 1: Bell was like, Nah, what are the odds?
Speaker 2: So Joseph Nye is an American political scientist. He and
Speaker 2: Robert Keone, Well, they co founded the International relations Theory
Speaker 2: of Neoliberalism, which, well, neo just means new so new liberalism.
Speaker 1: It's like the new extremists party of it. Or does
Speaker 1: this like mean like more libertarianism. I'm not sure what they're.
Speaker 2: Like, you know what I mean? Well, uh, neoliberal neoliberalism,
Speaker 2: or as they also quote it as liberal institutionalism.
Speaker 1: Oh gross?
Speaker 2: Is that not the opposite of what liberals used to be?
Speaker 1: Isn't that the other opposite of democracy? They were anti institution?
Speaker 1: That's gross, dude.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well it's uh. It says that it's a theory
Speaker 2: of international relations relations that holds uh that international cooperation
Speaker 2: between states is feasible and sustainable, and such cooperation can
Speaker 2: reduce conflict and competition neoliberalism. Neoliberalism is a revised version
Speaker 2: of liberalism. Alongside neorealism, liberal institutionalism is one of the
Speaker 2: two most influential contemporary approaches to international relations. In contrast
Speaker 2: to neorealist scholarship, which is skeptical of prospects for sustainable cooperation,
Speaker 2: liberal institutionalism argues that cooperation is feasible and sustainable.
Speaker 1: I mean, I agree that cooperation is feasible and sustainable,
Speaker 1: but whatever. Anyway, he suches more political think tanks that
Speaker 1: are trying to keep us under thumb.
Speaker 2: Right right, And so that Joseph Nye was, it says.
Speaker 2: More recently, he pioneered the theory of soft power. His
Speaker 2: notion of smart power, or the ability to combine hard
Speaker 2: and soft power into a successful strategy, became popular with
Speaker 2: the use of this phrase by members of the Clinton
Speaker 2: administration and the Obama administration.
Speaker 1: Yep, okay, say no more.
Speaker 2: So he was. He was also the Assistant Secretary of
Speaker 2: Defense for International Security Affairs for Bill Clinton EW and
Speaker 2: then he was the Chair of National Intelligence, one of
Speaker 2: the chairs of the National Intelligence Council for Bill Clinton,
Speaker 2: and I don't see where he did with Obama, but anyway,
Speaker 2: oh he was. In October of twenty fourteen, Secretary of
Speaker 2: State John Kerry appointed ny to the Foreign Affairs Policy Board.
Speaker 2: He is also a member of the Defense Policy Board. Okay,
Speaker 2: so they wanted to go from soft power, so you
Speaker 2: got hard power and you got soft power. Then they
Speaker 2: wanted to go more in the middle of smart power,
Speaker 2: which was a balance of the two.
Speaker 1: And all this was only for liberal presidents who yeah, okay.
Speaker 3: So that it sounds like the neoliberalism is in fact
Speaker 3: what we were talking about, and it is the extremist It
Speaker 3: is the ones that are screaming on CNN about how
Speaker 3: Trump is literally Hitler.
Speaker 1: That's this guy. Oh you told Joseph Nye Okay, oh.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, another nine another shithead.
Speaker 3: Maybe they are related. Fuck now I know that about him.
Speaker 3: It actually kind of leads more credence.
Speaker 2: Probably the world may never know. Maybe we'll look it
Speaker 2: up one day. But anyway, yeah, that's pretty much all
Speaker 2: we got on this topic on the Trilateral Commission. I
Speaker 2: am you know, if you want to find out more.
Speaker 2: Definitely do a little bit of a deeper dive. Honestly,
Speaker 2: we could have made this like an eight hour show
Speaker 2: if I had more time to really get stuff together.
Speaker 2: But we have lives still, and even though we do
Speaker 2: set aside some time to shoot and record and study
Speaker 2: and everything, every day, you know, we got families and
Speaker 2: shit we gotta deal with. So not that we got
Speaker 2: to deal with. We love our families. Obviously I knew
Speaker 2: what you mean.
Speaker 1: I knew what you meant. But yeah, no, this is
Speaker 1: an excellent episode. The Trilateral Commission.
Speaker 3: We like we said, we had talked about it before,
Speaker 3: we brought it up in a few episodes before, but
Speaker 3: this is a way better look at it, a real
Speaker 3: deep dive kind of like how we talked about the
Speaker 3: what is that the Israeli lobbying group? Hay that like
Speaker 3: APAC right when we did that deep dive on that,
Speaker 3: and it's like, look, we're not saying one way or
Speaker 3: another what to make of this. All we're saying is
Speaker 3: that it's a collective group of people that really shouldn't
Speaker 3: be in a room together talking about things in lockstep.
Speaker 3: The whole two wings of the same bird conversation. Yeah,
Speaker 3: that kind of comes into fruition when you look at
Speaker 3: groups like APEC and groups like the Trilateral Commission and
Speaker 3: the Center for Foreign Relations. These things kind of flow
Speaker 3: in a way that makes all of us.
Speaker 1: With our third eye all the way open and the
Speaker 1: ones they're seeking.
Speaker 3: Truth quite uncomfortable, you know, not really happy with the
Speaker 3: way that they're combining in back rooms and behind closed doors,
Speaker 3: and like there's real policy and change being made that
Speaker 3: we never hear anything about from faceless people that go
Speaker 3: from administration to administration.
Speaker 2: It's not a good feeling, that's right, I mean, And
Speaker 2: we talked out how you know, first off, on Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: He has all these boards or all these people on
Speaker 2: the board from not only the Council on Foreign Relations
Speaker 2: but also the Trilateral Commission. And then whenever we talked
Speaker 2: about a couple months ago, the the A Pack. Remember,
Speaker 2: nobody has received more donations from the A Pack in
Speaker 2: the history of A Pack other than Joe Biden. Joe
Speaker 2: Biden has received more money than anybody else. So whenever
Speaker 2: you want to talk about who's really pulling the strings,
Speaker 2: well I can't tell you exactly who's pulling the strings.
Speaker 2: Although I think we're kind of nibbling on something here.
Speaker 2: But we know who the puppets are, because the puppets
Speaker 2: are the ones who are receiving all the money, receiving
Speaker 2: all support, receiving all of the advice from the globalist,
Speaker 2: the elitist, the illuminati, whatever you want to call them.
Speaker 2: And I mean, got to say all the rabbit holes
Speaker 2: that we've gone down on, you know, watching the money flow,
Speaker 2: I feel pretty good about my vote, That's what I'm
Speaker 2: gonna say about.
Speaker 1: That, no doubt. When you look at it, bro, when
Speaker 1: you look at these people who they're in bed with.
Speaker 3: What team they quote unquote play for. It's not the
Speaker 3: American team, you know. And that was also crazy. Why
Speaker 3: would APEC be donating more to Biden? Whenever the other party,
Speaker 3: Trump on this one has been like seen as the
Speaker 3: savior of Israel and they are like they love Trump
Speaker 3: in Israel. Why would APEX be donating so much to Biden?
Speaker 3: And it's like huh, why indeed?
Speaker 1: Why?
Speaker 2: Indeed, especially whenever Netan Yahoo found out that Trump won
Speaker 2: the presidency, he was like stoked to hear about it.
Speaker 2: It's like, well, why you don't donating all your fucking
Speaker 2: money to Biden?
Speaker 1: Then it's very interesting and very dirty ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 1: Whenever we get to these types of topics and you
Speaker 1: see how this group isn't for one party or the other,
Speaker 1: or for this country or no, no, not at all.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, they are uh playing.
Speaker 3: At a level where the lines on the map are
Speaker 3: more of just suggestions, you know what I mean. It's
Speaker 3: more like departments of what they consider their company, i e.
Speaker 1: The world.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, it's global monopoly is really what.
Speaker 1: It is, one hundred percent.
Speaker 3: So, dear cult members, if you liked this episode, thought
Speaker 3: you learned something new, or maybe you're just.
Speaker 1: Like bro, this kind of blew my mind a little bit.
Speaker 1: Didn't even know these people were connected like this, and
Speaker 1: you would like to let us know about it in
Speaker 1: some way, shape or form. Well, at this time he
Speaker 1: got two thumbs, and this is free of charge.
Speaker 3: Right now, you could please at this time, hit the
Speaker 3: five stars, hit the shared, the likes to describe the comment,
Speaker 3: leave a post, leave review, shares with.
Speaker 1: Their friends and family, share everywhere. Here's the deal. The
Speaker 1: more activity the algorithm sees across all of our listing platforms,
Speaker 1: the more we get promoted to more potential listeners who
Speaker 1: could then become potential cult members like the rest of you.
Speaker 1: Finallyies and gentlemen, we thank you for everybody. He's already
Speaker 1: gone and done so. While you're at it, go check
Speaker 1: out Mena Mysteries, Jonathan's other show. Give him all the
Speaker 1: five stars, the reviews, the positiivity and co. Check out
Speaker 1: Caje to Night the YouTube channel, give me all the
Speaker 1: subscribes and the follows over there. We thank you for everybody.
Speaker 1: He's already going and done so.
Speaker 2: And with that being said, this was another beautiful episode
Speaker 2: of the Cult of Conspiracy. And my name is Jonathan
Speaker 2: Jacob and we have one very important, extremely vital piece
Speaker 2: of information we needed to learn just as soon as
Speaker 2: humanly possible.
Speaker 7: So s.
Speaker 6: S ss so, that's
Speaker 10: So s