Speaker 1: At some point when things settle down, I'm going to
Speaker 1: meet with China and I'm going to meet with Russia,
Speaker 1: in particular those two, and I'm going to say, there's
Speaker 1: no reason for us to be spending almost a trillion
Speaker 1: dollars on military. There's no reason for you to be
Speaker 1: spending four hundred billion dollars. China's going to be at
Speaker 1: four hundred billion, We're at a trillion. We're going to
Speaker 1: be a plus to a trillion. And I'm going to say,
Speaker 1: we can settle this on we can spend this on
Speaker 1: other things. We don't have to spend this on military.
Speaker 1: Because and I'm going to be meeting with China. You know,
Speaker 1: we were trying to de escalate nuclear and I was
Speaker 1: in a position where Russia had agreed and had agreed
Speaker 1: we were going to start, and then we had a
Speaker 1: rigged election, so that never took place. But this one
Speaker 1: was too big to rig. We won by so much
Speaker 1: that it was too big to rig.
Speaker 2: What I've realized over the past two weeks is that
Speaker 2: I'm accustomed to coming on the show to talk to
Speaker 2: you guys and doing so when I'm upset about things.
Speaker 3: That's what I've realized that's.
Speaker 2: Been basically the entire impetus for me to start this
Speaker 2: show is that I was so pissed about the trajectory
Speaker 2: of things and what was going on, and then I
Speaker 2: realized that, like, oh, why am I struggling to come
Speaker 2: up with, you know, something to talk about? And it's like, oh,
Speaker 2: because I like almost everything that's happening right now. Wow,
Speaker 2: what a time to be alive. Clint is happy. I
Speaker 2: hope many of you feel the same way. But this
Speaker 2: is this is such a big deal, man. I mean,
Speaker 2: for for Trump to talk about trilateral not just not
Speaker 2: just military draw downs, but denuclearization between Russia, China, and
Speaker 2: America is such a big deal, such a big deal.
Speaker 3: I mean, he.
Speaker 2: Talks all tough, you know, tariffs all day long when
Speaker 2: it comes to everybody, but in particular China, but he
Speaker 2: realizes at the end of the day, there's no there's
Speaker 2: no winning scenario where the US and China and Russia
Speaker 2: go to war. Like it's just not a win for anybody.
Speaker 2: And this is all I've been saying, this all every
Speaker 2: libertarian's been saying in any sane person has been saying
Speaker 2: for years now. It's like this just can't happen. It
Speaker 2: can't happen, and even more stupid, why are we spending
Speaker 2: trillions of dollars on build up for this war that
Speaker 2: just can't happen, So why do it? And he's like, Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's that's right, let's not let's not do that.
Speaker 3: I can't.
Speaker 2: I couldn't be more happy. I mean, I now, granted
Speaker 2: it's just rhetoric at this point, he's just saying it.
Speaker 2: The follow through will mean everything. As he said there
Speaker 2: at the end of that clip, he was in talks
Speaker 2: with China in his first presidential term and he felt
Speaker 2: like they were really close actually to having an agreement
Speaker 2: to draw down on nuclear weapon and it got derailed.
Speaker 2: Could the deep state strike back? Is the Empire really
Speaker 2: going to go out without a fight, or will the
Speaker 2: Empire strike back? Like the odds are the Empire is
Speaker 2: going to strike back at some point, and we don't
Speaker 2: know what that what that'll look like. I might theorize
Speaker 2: about that a little bit later in this episode, but
Speaker 2: in the interim, my goodness, man, I mean, such a
Speaker 2: big deal just to have a president saying the logical
Speaker 2: rational thing like hey, let's not have a nuclear build
Speaker 2: up between the three largest nuclear powers in human history,
Speaker 2: with the three largest militaries in humanistry.
Speaker 3: Let's not do it. Let's not do it.
Speaker 2: It's like, Oh, rationality is back. What a miracle. He
Speaker 2: didn't stop there, though. He then went on to say this,
Speaker 2: which is even more heartening.
Speaker 1: I'd love to have them back. I think it was
Speaker 1: a mistake to throw them out. Look, it's not a
Speaker 1: question of liking Russia or not liking Russia. It was
Speaker 1: the GA. And you know, I said, what are you doing?
Speaker 1: You guys, all you talk about is Russia, and they
Speaker 1: should be sitting at the table.
Speaker 3: I think Putin would loved to be back.
Speaker 1: Obama and a couple of other people made a mistake
Speaker 1: and they got Russia out. It's very possible that if
Speaker 1: that was the G eight, you wouldn't have had the
Speaker 1: problem with Ukraine. And if I was president, you definitely
Speaker 1: wouldn't have had the problem with Ukraine. Russia would have
Speaker 1: never attacked Ukraine. But but you ask a very good question.
Speaker 1: The GA used to be the G eight, and then
Speaker 1: these people threw them out. And I was arguing with
Speaker 1: Trudeau and with numerous of the people. Actually Prime Minister Abbie,
Speaker 1: a great man from Japan, agreed with me one hundred percent,
Speaker 1: and some of the others did too, but I got there.
Speaker 1: It was the G seven. As you know, they had
Speaker 1: already been terminated. I think it would have been very helpful,
Speaker 1: and it still would be helpful to have Russia be
Speaker 1: a part of that mix, and I think if they were,
Speaker 1: I don't think you would have had the problem that
Speaker 1: you have right now.
Speaker 2: So for those that aren't familiar with the history, the
Speaker 2: G seven consists of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK,
Speaker 2: and the US. At a time, it was the G eight,
Speaker 2: in which Russia was also a member, and they essentially
Speaker 2: come up with different security protocols and things like that,
Speaker 2: and they have conversations.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 2: It's essentially like NATO, but smaller, smaller block of nations.
Speaker 2: After Russia took Crimea in twenty fourteen, which they did,
Speaker 2: they were suspended from the G eight and it became
Speaker 2: the G seven. And I think it was twenty eighteen
Speaker 2: when Russia ultimately withdrew entirely, probably with the expectation that
Speaker 2: they were going to be going to war with Ukraine
Speaker 2: in the not too distant future, or at least that
Speaker 2: was like leverage to try and threaten the West broadly,
Speaker 2: like hey, we're serious, we're leaving the G seven or
Speaker 2: we're leaving the G eight. It didn't work, and it's
Speaker 2: just such an important thing to have. Libertarians, including myself,
Speaker 2: have a hard time looking at the presidency as anything serious.
Speaker 2: It's like, oh, the commander in chief, sure, Like he
Speaker 2: tried to be the commander in chief last time he
Speaker 2: tried to draw down our troops in Syria. They told
Speaker 2: him to kick rock, So like, is he the commander
Speaker 2: in chief really? Clint Like, I don't know. But Trump
Speaker 2: is trying to act as if he's the real president,
Speaker 2: which is something Joe Biden never did.
Speaker 3: I don't think he.
Speaker 2: I don't think he even pretended really or that he
Speaker 2: was even like sentient enough to understand that he wasn't
Speaker 2: the real president of the United States. But Trump seems
Speaker 2: to be behaving as if he thinks he is and
Speaker 2: believes that he is, and he's doing everything in his
Speaker 2: power to actually act and accomplish things, as if a
Speaker 2: real president with real thoughts can actually do something to
Speaker 2: change the trajectory of the world. And so far it's working.
Speaker 2: Now we're only three weeks in a lot could change,
Speaker 2: but this is so big, is absolutely huge, not only
Speaker 2: a tri level agreement to draw down not just nuclear weapons,
Speaker 2: but just the broad based spending, which is a trillion
Speaker 2: annually that the US spends, three to four hundred billion
Speaker 2: that China is spending. I'm not sure how much Russia
Speaker 2: is spending. It's just such an immense waste of resources
Speaker 2: for not just Americans but all countries. I mean, spending
Speaker 2: on military is wasteful inherently, and you know, sure you
Speaker 2: get some value out of it, Like it's important to
Speaker 2: not be at war, so if you have defense, maybe
Speaker 2: that diminishes the chances of war. But you have a
Speaker 2: trilateral build up that's happening where everyone's just building up. Well,
Speaker 2: guess what, it's not just America that has a military
Speaker 2: industrial complex. Yes, we produce the most advanced weaponry in
Speaker 2: the world as far as I know, but China also
Speaker 2: has some and Russia has some. So as long as
Speaker 2: they're infusing three hundred billion or more of their taxpayer
Speaker 2: dollars into their own military build up, some of which
Speaker 2: is purchasing from America, I'd imagine not much. But that
Speaker 2: what that does is it creates an incentive structure by
Speaker 2: which you have these industries that pop up to fill
Speaker 2: this this demand that once they're there, they don't really
Speaker 2: want to go away, now, do they. Like, So, do
Speaker 2: you want to have an American industrial complex that is
Speaker 2: comparable to that of the Russian military industrial complex and
Speaker 2: China's military Like, No, you don't want that. You don't
Speaker 2: want to have these three entrenched industrial military industrial complexes
Speaker 2: that just drain resources with the likely inevitable conclude being
Speaker 2: that there is a war so that they can use
Speaker 2: their stockpiles and then have it be refilled. So this
Speaker 2: is this is a mandatory prerequisite step towards avoiding a
Speaker 2: war between these countries and ultimately hopefully a lasting piece.
Speaker 2: I cannot tell you how meaningful it is that Trump
Speaker 2: would even though it's not it's nothing formal, it's nothing like, well,
Speaker 2: we've signed an agreement or anything like that. But it's
Speaker 2: just such a big deal to have a president who
Speaker 2: actually talks about it, who says it with seriousness and
Speaker 2: with a sense of optimism that maybe we don't have
Speaker 2: to go to war with Russia or China. What a
Speaker 2: novel concept. How insane is it that that's even novel
Speaker 2: that that's not just very commonplace, that that wasn't standard
Speaker 2: procedure for all presidents in your lifetime, that hey, let's
Speaker 2: avoid World War three like duh, right, But that's how
Speaker 2: dark it was, That's how unbelievably led astray we were
Speaker 2: that we had this, as I said earlier, barely sentient
Speaker 2: puppet of a human being, and Joe Biden, who's just
Speaker 2: literally just marionetting and around like how much money do
Speaker 2: you need?
Speaker 3: Ukraine?
Speaker 2: And for the record, this isn't a strictly part as
Speaker 2: an issue. Republicans, by and large, we're all standing in
Speaker 2: line just like the Democrats to cast their yes votes
Speaker 2: for every new multi billion dollar aid package that went
Speaker 2: to Ukraine and Israel and many other places all over
Speaker 2: the world. This is bipartisan. But Trump seems to be
Speaker 2: representing a real title shift, a change, a desperately needed one.
Speaker 2: And that leads me into the even better news, or
Speaker 2: I guess it's not even better news. That was probably
Speaker 2: the best news we'll get today, particularly if it becomes formalized.
Speaker 2: My goodness, what a great, great thing to heart. But
Speaker 2: we just got RFK Junior confirmed. The Senate has officially confirmed,
Speaker 2: not just RFK Jr. As the head of AHHS, but
Speaker 2: also Tulsi Gabbard as d and I, my goodness, what's
Speaker 2: really remarkable about this is that the vote tally came
Speaker 2: down on I think almost almost exact party lines, but inversed.
Speaker 2: This is what's I think this is a really revelatory thing.
Speaker 2: As you guys know, I'm sure Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr.
Speaker 2: Were lifelong Democrats. I mean, you don't get more Democrat
Speaker 2: as particularly Democrat royalty than RFK Jr. Son of our,
Speaker 2: son of RFK, nephew of JFK. It's He's Kennedy. The
Speaker 2: Kennedy name is probably more synonymous with the Democrat Party
Speaker 2: than even the Clintons, at least to me it is.
Speaker 2: I don't know, I have a little bit more affinity
Speaker 2: towards that family than I do the Clintons, but you
Speaker 2: can't go much lower than that. And he's just been
Speaker 2: excommunicated because he actually had some principles that, you know,
Speaker 2: we're just outside of the bounds of their extraordinarily narrow
Speaker 2: Overton window. He was like, yeah, I believe I'm right
Speaker 2: about these things. I've spent my life litigating these issues.
Speaker 2: I've studied it, I've written books on it, and I
Speaker 2: think I'm right now. As I've said many times, I
Speaker 2: think RFK Junior is probably wrong about some of his
Speaker 2: his I guess I wouldn't say that there are assumptions
Speaker 2: but his hypotheses. But I think he's right about a
Speaker 2: lot of his hypotheses as well. And I think that
Speaker 2: we're going to find out in his four year term
Speaker 2: as head of HHS what he's right about and what
Speaker 2: he's wrong about. And I think that's good. You know, Libertarians,
Speaker 2: me included, as always, we tend to be very skeptical
Speaker 2: of government power whatsoever, as we should be. We also
Speaker 2: tend to have very little faith that good things can
Speaker 2: happen via the government. So I want to reframe this
Speaker 2: as to like, how I perceive this change and why
Speaker 2: think RFK Junior is a good change agent.
Speaker 4: Or twenty years, I'm up every morning on my knees
Speaker 4: and pray the guy would put me in a position
Speaker 4: where I can end the childhood of chronic disease epicomty
Speaker 4: in his country. On August twenty third of last year,
Speaker 4: God send me President Trump, right, and he's give me.
Speaker 4: He's now given me. He's given every promise that he's
Speaker 4: made to me, He's kept his word in every account
Speaker 4: and gone way beyond it. I'm so grateful to you,
Speaker 4: mister President. A lot of people told me I couldn't
Speaker 4: trust President Trump. I better get it in writing, and
Speaker 4: we did a handshake, and everything that he told me
Speaker 4: he was going to do, he has done. And I'm
Speaker 4: so grateful to him. And I've told you before, I
Speaker 4: genuinely believe that you are a pimodal historical figure and
Speaker 4: you are going to transform this crusty.
Speaker 2: Today's episode of Liberty Lockdown is brought to you once
Speaker 2: again by our friends over at crowd Health. Health insurance
Speaker 2: is a nightmare. I don't know if you've tried to
Speaker 2: get any sort of healthcare in the past few years,
Speaker 2: but it sucks, and if dealing with insurance makes it
Speaker 2: even worse, it's truly insult to injury. In my opinion,
Speaker 2: the headache of health insurance is exactly why crowdhealth was created.
Speaker 2: It's not health insurance. It's a better way to pay
Speaker 2: for healthcare through crowd funding. So stop sending money the
Speaker 2: big insurance companies who profit off of not paying your
Speaker 2: bills and check out crowd Health for one hundred and
Speaker 2: seventy five dollars for an individual or five hundred and
Speaker 2: seventy five dollars for a family of four or more.
Speaker 2: You'll get access to a community of people who are
Speaker 2: willing to help out in the event of an emergency.
Speaker 2: You'll get access to telemedicine visits, diskind of prescriptions, and
Speaker 2: so much more without doctor's networks getting in the way.
Speaker 2: And of course, you'll join the crowd, a group of
Speaker 2: members just like you who want to help pay for
Speaker 2: each other's unexpected medical events. Let crowd health help with
Speaker 2: your health care needs. Get started today for just ninety
Speaker 2: nine dollars per month for your first three months by
Speaker 2: using code lockdown at join crowdhealth dot com. That's join
Speaker 2: crowdhealth dot com code lockdown. Crowdhealth is not insurance. Learn
Speaker 2: more at joincrowdhealth dot com. That's join crowdhealth dot com
Speaker 2: code lockdown. When once you recognize that it's highly probable
Speaker 2: that the government's interference in our food supply, in our
Speaker 2: economy broadly is creating a paradigm by which we are
Speaker 2: essentially broadly sickening ourselves, well, then it's not really government
Speaker 2: interference to stop.
Speaker 3: See what I'm saying.
Speaker 2: It's almost like abolition. It's not really about it's not
Speaker 2: really about government interference as much as it is just
Speaker 2: reveting government interference that already exists, like all of the
Speaker 2: subsidies that go towards sugar, for instance, or corn, well
Speaker 2: because of corn in particular, is the one that really
Speaker 2: has led us astray in my opinion, is it then
Speaker 2: made us shift from sugar to hyfructose corn syrup, which
Speaker 2: was a derivative product of the corn crops which were
Speaker 2: being subsidized because of these government programs to defend our farmers.
Speaker 2: But what did that amount to, Well, it amounted to
Speaker 2: massive uptick and diabetes and obesity. Now there's lots of
Speaker 2: like this is not all on the government. I think
Speaker 2: the other thing that libertarians do that's really bad is
Speaker 2: oftentimes we blame the government for everything. Not everything is
Speaker 2: the government's fault. We don't believe that they're capable of
Speaker 2: accomplishing much, so why would we put every bad thing
Speaker 2: on their shoulders? Obviously that's not true either. Now they're
Speaker 2: responsible for a hell of a lot, but not everything.
Speaker 2: And this is one that's the blame can get spread
Speaker 2: around quite equitably, you know, It's it's obvious that, like
Speaker 2: as a people, we have gone astray. We've stopped concerning
Speaker 2: ourselves with eating whole foods. We've eaten far too much
Speaker 2: mass processed foods. It's very unhealthy. And I think that
Speaker 2: the proof is in the statistic, like we are increasingly
Speaker 2: not just unhealthy, but deeply unhealthy with multiple comorbidities. And
Speaker 2: we really learned that during the lockdown era that if
Speaker 2: you were healthy, if you were the thirty to forty
Speaker 2: percent of people that are genuinely healthy in this country,
Speaker 2: well then you weren't at much risk of COVID. But
Speaker 2: if you were sitting on three to four to five
Speaker 2: to six comorbidities high blood pressure, diabetes, emphasema, cancer, whatever,
Speaker 2: you were probably screwed. Like that was when you were
Speaker 2: really in jeopardy. And what we learned because of our
Speaker 2: mortality rate during that period is that we were really
Speaker 2: unhealthy compared to the rest of the world. And I
Speaker 2: think that RFK Junior arises in a time when he's
Speaker 2: really necessary where he forced us to relook at all
Speaker 2: of this. Like I don't know if you guys feel
Speaker 2: the same way. This is just how I feel but
Speaker 2: I really do feel as if like he has made
Speaker 2: me reassess exactly what we're putting in our bodies, why
Speaker 2: we're doing it. Yes's involvement, but also big business, big ag,
Speaker 2: the industry, like what are they doing? Why are they
Speaker 2: doing it?
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 2: Much of the reason that they've gone so astray is
Speaker 2: because of government interference and as I said earlier, the
Speaker 2: subsidies and things like that. Certainly the FDA didn't help
Speaker 2: with their food pyramid.
Speaker 3: That just made us fat as hell.
Speaker 2: They're like eight twenty five servings of grain per day,
Speaker 2: you'll be fine. It's like probably not advisable, but avoid fat,
Speaker 2: you know, only have four to five of protein. That's like,
Speaker 2: that's that's the dangerous stuff.
Speaker 3: I mean, it was.
Speaker 2: It was laughably, it was almost inverted. It was really disgusting.
Speaker 2: And the lobbyists were responsible for much of that. But
Speaker 2: the lobbyists come from the private businesses too, So this
Speaker 2: is not this is not strictly government bad thing. This
Speaker 2: is also like financial interests that exists within the food production,
Speaker 2: you know, chain of command were guilty too, Like they
Speaker 2: have blood on their hands too. Now I am hesitant
Speaker 2: to give like just a blank check to RFA because
Speaker 2: at the end of the day, he's a democrat. He's
Speaker 2: been a democrat for life. He's certainly he's seen the
Speaker 2: light on many things, I think gun rights in particular.
Speaker 2: But that doesn't mean that he's gonna be like a
Speaker 2: small government, you know, minarchist moving forward. He's probably gonna
Speaker 2: move with a fairly heavy hand, and I will be
Speaker 2: on guard for that, and I will try my best
Speaker 2: to maintain my principles as I analyze his behavior and
Speaker 2: what he does in that role. But I think that
Speaker 2: it's just obvious to me at this point that things
Speaker 2: were so fucked up that we need a major change agent.
Speaker 2: We need a almost revolutionary figure in that role, just
Speaker 2: to even if we don't empower him to make these
Speaker 2: changes unilaterally, but just for disclosure purposes. I mean, this
Speaker 2: guy is a serious attorney. He definitely knows how to
Speaker 2: do his own research. If you've read the real Anthony Fauci,
Speaker 2: then you already know I'm telling you the truth on
Speaker 2: that that dude had thousands of cliff notes or citations
Speaker 2: in that book. It's obvious to me that he's capable
Speaker 2: of doing the due diligence necessary and surrounding himself, with
Speaker 2: the people that will assist him in that process to
Speaker 2: find out the truth of like, hey, where did COVID
Speaker 2: come from? Now, if you've read his book, you already
Speaker 2: know he's got a pretty pretty firm handle on who
Speaker 2: and why and what all transpired there. But to have
Speaker 2: him with that impremature of authority to talk about this
Speaker 2: not just as this you know, dissident democrat who's been excommunicated,
Speaker 2: but rather the head of HHS, who's got the entire
Speaker 2: government agency, which, by the way, HHS manages an immense
Speaker 2: amount of resources, far more than it should for the record,
Speaker 2: But because he will then have that legitimacy, I think
Speaker 2: it will make it will force more people to consider
Speaker 2: seriously what he has to say, and particularly when he
Speaker 2: has the ability to get behind layers of secrecy NDAs
Speaker 2: and to I don't know if he has as subpoena
Speaker 2: power I assume not, But if he has a good
Speaker 2: working relationship with Pam Bondi as ag who knows, maybe
Speaker 2: he can essentially serve as a conduit for the real
Speaker 2: investigatory work that's necessary to find out what the hell
Speaker 2: happened with our health agencies. Broadly, I think he's already
Speaker 2: got a pretty good idea, but in that position of authority,
Speaker 2: he could certainly require his subordinates to turn over the documents,
Speaker 2: and if they refuse, he's got Bondi on speed dial,
Speaker 2: with the power of the President behind him too. I mean,
Speaker 2: this is exactly what we needed. I'm just being honest.
Speaker 2: I really think this is exactly what we needed. We
Speaker 2: needed someone who's actually interested in finding out the truth
Speaker 2: and stopping the origin of the sickness, as opposed to
Speaker 2: just focusing on the medicines, which is obviously not fixing
Speaker 2: us at least not always. And I think that that's
Speaker 2: really what we needed. And I think it's going to
Speaker 2: be just revelatory for a lot of people that haven't
Speaker 2: done any looking into our medical health establishment and how
Speaker 2: it functions. I think they will. They will be jaw
Speaker 2: dropped once they realize this. Now. A lot of them
Speaker 2: are going to reject it no matter what, but I
Speaker 2: think some people will see the light, and I think
Speaker 2: it's going to be really impactful, and I hope most importantly,
Speaker 2: it'll be impactful for our children, you know, the next generations.
Speaker 2: It's an injustice that rivals any level of criminality. I've
Speaker 2: ever witnessed that, to put kids on drugs and things
Speaker 2: like that, it's just been terrible. I won't go into
Speaker 2: the details. You guys already know what I'm talking about,
Speaker 2: but it's crazy. So you got Bobby Is, head of HHS.
Speaker 3: He basically goes from how do we put this?
Speaker 2: He goes from you know, quack as they call him,
Speaker 2: to attack dog against the pharma industry. And then you've
Speaker 2: got Tulsi Gabbard as D and I, which she goes
Speaker 2: from no flight.
Speaker 3: To D and I. But boom.
Speaker 2: I mean this is like, don't call it a comeback.
Speaker 2: I mean, yeah, it's a comeback, man, It's it's but
Speaker 2: it's not just a comeback.
Speaker 3: For them as individuals.
Speaker 2: I really feel like it's a comeback for the country.
Speaker 2: And I was thinking about this earlier, and it's like,
Speaker 2: if you're a Democrat at this point, if you're one
Speaker 2: of the few remaining semi saying Democrats, and you're looking
Speaker 2: around and you're like, wait a second. I used to
Speaker 2: I used to kind of like Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Junior.
Speaker 2: Now I'm forbidden from liking them. And now my representatives
Speaker 2: in the Senate vote on strict party lines against former Democrats.
Speaker 2: But I've been told that, you know, Trump intends to
Speaker 2: implement Project twenty twenty five, and he's a fascist and
Speaker 2: he hates us, and he wants to imprison us or
Speaker 2: end our lives are worse, and he's interested in putting
Speaker 2: lifelong Democrats as the head of HHS and D and
Speaker 2: I like that. It has to be creating some cognitive
Speaker 2: dissonance with these folks, like they have to be thinking
Speaker 2: that themselves.
Speaker 3: Is the narrative about Trump true? Why would he do this?
Speaker 3: Not not all of them, but just some.
Speaker 2: There's still some with some semblance of rationality that have
Speaker 2: to be thinking about this again, especially after what happened
Speaker 2: with the Biden presidency where they just lied about his
Speaker 2: mental health and then all of a sudden, in forty
Speaker 2: eight hours, he went from you know, write his reign
Speaker 2: to deranged. I don't know why I keep rhyming today,
Speaker 2: but that's.
Speaker 3: Basically what they did. They're like, this dude sharp.
Speaker 2: As a tack, and they're like, we got to take
Speaker 2: him out back. I'm gonna stop rhyming, I promise, but.
Speaker 3: That's what they did.
Speaker 2: Then they replace him with Kamala and then they lie
Speaker 2: to their supporters about Kamala and how you know she's
Speaker 2: she's real bright too, and they're watching this and they're like, God,
Speaker 2: this lady's not bright. Like, yeah, I still would prefer
Speaker 2: her over Trump, but she's obviously not bright. And then
Speaker 2: and then this, and now you have every Democrat voting
Speaker 2: against Tulsa Gabbard in RFK Junior to be at the
Speaker 2: highest levels of Trump's cabinet. I mean, there's there's basically
Speaker 2: nothing higher than what he just gave Bobby Kennedy. He's
Speaker 2: now the boss of the CDC, the FDA, nih.
Speaker 3: I mean, he's the boss's boss. He's the guy for
Speaker 3: all of it.
Speaker 2: It's amazing and and I just want to reiterate. You know,
Speaker 2: Trump didn't have to do this. Yeah, he promised it,
Speaker 2: but he didn't have to deliver. He could have just
Speaker 2: told Bobby like, look, man, I don't think that the
Speaker 2: Senate's going to confirm you, So I'll give you some
Speaker 2: position in my cabinet that's not that that's not as
Speaker 2: high up. Or I'll I'll give you some influential position
Speaker 2: within HHS, you know, not.
Speaker 3: The head of it. He didn't do that.
Speaker 2: He kept to his promise. He delivered on something that
Speaker 2: I don't think that the Maha movement broadly would have
Speaker 2: ever believed truly possible, or if they did, it was
Speaker 2: just a hope. It was kind of like the libertyans hope,
Speaker 2: like will he actually put a libertary in his cabinet?
Speaker 2: Will he actually free ross Albrich? Like we hope, but
Speaker 2: are you going to bet on it? Probably not, you know,
Speaker 2: like it was a coin flip at best, it felt like.
Speaker 2: And now you look at his deliveries on these promises
Speaker 2: and you're like, Jesus, he's doing it all, Like all
Speaker 2: of it. I mean, tell me one thing that he's
Speaker 2: promised that he hasn't delivered on. I'm trying to think
Speaker 2: of him. I'm like, sure, he hasn't negotiated a peace
Speaker 2: in Ukraine on day one, but as you saw on
Speaker 2: this clip earlier, like he's working on it, he's having
Speaker 2: real conversations with it. And Trump didn't just stop there.
Speaker 1: I don't see anyway that a country in Russia's position
Speaker 1: could allow them, just in their position, could allow them
Speaker 1: to join NATO. I don't see that happening. And long
Speaker 1: before President Putin, Russia was very strong on the fact
Speaker 1: that I believe that's the reason the war started because
Speaker 1: Biden went out and said that they could join NATO,
Speaker 1: and he shouldn't have said that.
Speaker 5: As soon as he.
Speaker 1: Said that, I said, you know what, you're gonna have
Speaker 1: a war now. And I was right about that. This
Speaker 1: is a war that would have never happened if I
Speaker 1: were president. I think Biden is incompetent, and I think
Speaker 1: when he said that they could join NATO, I thought
Speaker 1: that was a very stupid thing to say. I thought
Speaker 1: when he said, well, it depends if it's a minor incursion.
Speaker 1: In other words, it's okay if Brescia does a minor incursion,
Speaker 1: I thought that was a very foolish thing to say.
Speaker 2: Today's episode is brought to you once again by our
Speaker 2: friends over it my Pillow. I know how cool is
Speaker 2: this if you are looking for not just pillows, blankets,
Speaker 2: bed sheets, slippers, anything cozy. If you want to be
Speaker 2: like Clint Russell, you want to be cozy. That's priority
Speaker 2: number one. As soon as I get home, I get cozy.
Speaker 2: If you're not cozy, you ain't living. Get cozy with
Speaker 2: my pillow. Go to my pillow dot com, slash lockdown
Speaker 2: or you can call eight hundred dish eight o three
Speaker 2: dish oh three three nine. I know I have my
Speaker 2: own personal phone number to my pillow. How insane is that?
Speaker 2: But the easier way for the more tech savvy amongst
Speaker 2: us go to my pillow dot com slash lockdown and
Speaker 2: check out all of their goodies. I'm telling you you
Speaker 2: won't be disappointed. They got a lot of awesome stuff.
Speaker 2: I'm a fan, and uh yeah, they support the show.
Speaker 2: I support them. You support them, then you support the show.
Speaker 2: That's how it works. MyPillow dot com code lockdown, check
Speaker 2: it out.
Speaker 3: So exactly what Scott.
Speaker 2: Horton and Dave Smith and me and Tom and everybody
Speaker 2: else have been saying for the longest time, and Meerscheimer
Speaker 2: and a whole bunch of others.
Speaker 3: Obviously, Yeah, it's.
Speaker 2: An absurd demand of Russia to accept that their southern
Speaker 2: neighbor should be put into a military defensive pact with
Speaker 2: the leading military on Earth, America. It's fucking insane. It's
Speaker 2: insane to ever think that that was at all plausible
Speaker 2: or that it would ever be accepted by the Russians.
Speaker 2: And it wasn't. So Yeah, when you start to talk
Speaker 2: like that, there's consequences for really dumb fucking ideas like
Speaker 2: adding Ukraine, one of the most corrupt nations, if not
Speaker 2: the most corrupt nation in Eastern Europe, just adding them
Speaker 2: into NATO, this military alliance that requires that if there's
Speaker 2: ever a fight between Russia and the US, the Article
Speaker 2: five that we're supposed to defend them. There's some questions
Speaker 2: about how mandatory the defense is, if it just means
Speaker 2: that we have to provide them weaponry or if we
Speaker 2: actually have to fight on their behalf, but regardless, it
Speaker 2: puts US in a very dangerous situation and from the
Speaker 2: Russians perspective, an existential threat, massive threat. So yeah, they
Speaker 2: weren't going to allow for it. And Trump just gets
Speaker 2: back in the White House and like, after four years,
Speaker 2: I just want to really emphasize the Trump administrator, or
Speaker 2: excuse me, the Biden administration with Anthony blink In at State.
Speaker 2: They weren't talking to the Russians for years, as we
Speaker 2: were actively funding to the two of hundreds of billions
Speaker 2: of dollars their neighbor in a war. We were in
Speaker 2: a proxy war with a nuclear power, and they hung
Speaker 2: up the phone and they tore the fucking phone.
Speaker 3: Out of the wall.
Speaker 2: I know that's old school, old school reference because no
Speaker 2: one has house phones anymore, but you know what I'm saying.
Speaker 2: During the Cold War there was this red phone famously,
Speaker 2: that was obviously a landline that they could pick up
Speaker 2: that was directly connected to the Kremlin and you could
Speaker 2: have Yeltsin and Reagan or whoever talked. They got rid
Speaker 2: of that, they just didn't talk to them for years,
Speaker 2: and they continued to shovel as much money as humanly
Speaker 2: possible into this pit of despair known as Ukraine, and
Speaker 2: they weren't having conversations. And it's just like, ah, rationality
Speaker 2: is back all I wanted. Like, it's not an assurance
Speaker 2: that because you pick up the phone and you start
Speaker 2: to talk to Putin that we don't end up in
Speaker 2: a war with them. But guess what far greater likelihood
Speaker 2: of us ending up in a war with Russia if
Speaker 2: we're not having a conversation with them, Well, we armed
Speaker 2: their neighbor in an obvious proxy war against Russia right
Speaker 2: on their border, Like duh. So this is massive, And
Speaker 2: I think this is why I've struggled to sit down
Speaker 2: and record, because I'm just so fucking thrilled with everything
Speaker 2: that's happening. This is like things I didn't think could
Speaker 2: possibly happen. He got rid of the Department of Education,
Speaker 2: for God's sakes, like it's basically gone. He did a
Speaker 2: full foreign aid funding freeze aside from Israel. Obviously, I mean, massive,
Speaker 2: massive step in the right direction. He's sicked doze on usaid,
Speaker 2: do you know how big that is? Let me explain
Speaker 2: it a little bit, because I talk a lot about
Speaker 2: because of my preparation for that debate against Destiny a
Speaker 2: couple of years ago, where I was debating the war
Speaker 2: in Ukraine, which by the way, I was obviously fucking right, duh, Destiny,
Speaker 2: What an idiot. But when I was preparing for that,
Speaker 2: you know, I read Scott's entire book like two years
Speaker 2: before it was even finalized, and the major takeaway I
Speaker 2: had from it was that, oh, yeah, it's our state
Speaker 2: department that actually funds this stuff. So that's what I
Speaker 2: always talked about. I was always talking about state department interference.
Speaker 2: I talked about Victoria Nulan a lot, or Jake Sullivan.
Speaker 2: I was like, this is a state department operation. What
Speaker 2: I never really talked about enough, which I should have
Speaker 2: been because I just kind of thought of them as synonymous.
Speaker 2: Was that USAID, which is the United States Agency for
Speaker 2: International Development, is not about foreign aid. Let's get that
Speaker 2: fucking clear. Is the funding mechanism for State Department, Like
Speaker 2: that is how they actually implement their plans. So the
Speaker 2: State Department comes up with the crazy plans, they you know,
Speaker 2: have the phone calls with the diplomats and they set
Speaker 2: all of the dominoes up, But then the funding mechanism
Speaker 2: to try and get the street riots and things like
Speaker 2: that going come through USAID. So for him to go
Speaker 2: after USAID is about as ballsy and as direct an
Speaker 2: attack on the real deep state, like the real military
Speaker 2: industrial complex, the real intelligence community that I've ever seen
Speaker 2: in my life that I ever could have dreampt for,
Speaker 2: next to abolishing the CIA, the FBI, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 2: Like it's huge. I'm I'm at a loss. I mean,
Speaker 2: he never once talked about that on the campaign trail.
Speaker 2: I don't think he even intended to do it. Let
Speaker 2: me tell you what I think happened. Actually, I think
Speaker 2: he did intend to try and figure out why the
Speaker 2: whole system worked against him, Because you got to always
Speaker 2: whenever you're analyzing Trump's actions, you have to try and
Speaker 2: put it into his incentive structure, and what's his incentive structure?
Speaker 2: What makes me look good, what makes me look bad,
Speaker 2: what makes me more loved? What makes me more hated?
Speaker 2: And he's like, all.
Speaker 3: Right, why was I so hated?
Speaker 2: And I think this is why he started with the
Speaker 2: fake news moniker. He starts to to try and expressed
Speaker 2: to the American people like, you don't hate me. The
Speaker 2: news wants you to hate me because they're liars. That
Speaker 2: was like his rudimentary explanation, and probably his genuine understanding
Speaker 2: is like, why am I not beloved? I've been loved
Speaker 2: for thirty years in this country. Americans loved me. Now
Speaker 2: they hate me. This is weird. It's fake news. Fake
Speaker 2: news is doing it. But this go around, after the
Speaker 2: multiple impeachments and assassination attempts and the spying by the
Speaker 2: FBI and everything else, I think he finally thought to himself,
Speaker 2: all right, there's got to be resources that are being funneled.
Speaker 2: I tried to stop it in my first term. I
Speaker 2: was totally unable to There has to be an agency
Speaker 2: that I'm not paying attention to. That's actually the fuel
Speaker 2: to this fire. I still don't even think he thought
Speaker 2: or knew it was USAID. What I think happened was this,
Speaker 2: he six this DOGE entity with Elon on it, and
Speaker 2: Elon has expressed this actually he said, he said, the
Speaker 2: way we we have decided on where to focus is
Speaker 2: we asked for documentation from all of the agencies and
Speaker 2: whoever gave us the hardest time in delivering, you know,
Speaker 2: our receivables. That's what we focused on. And guess who
Speaker 2: was the least transparent.
Speaker 3: It was USAID.
Speaker 2: Because it's the funding arm for the State Department and
Speaker 2: kind of the CIA. So yeah, they were like, stonewall,
Speaker 2: we ain't giving you shit. Elon hits up Trump and
Speaker 2: he's like, yo, I think I found our source code.
Speaker 2: I really think that's what happened. And then after that
Speaker 2: Trump goes, well, then we're going to freeze their funding.
Speaker 2: We'll does just freeze it. And then once you freeze it,
Speaker 2: you can actually see what continues and what stops, because
Speaker 2: as soon as the money drives up, all of the influencers,
Speaker 2: all of the musicians that they actually they genuinely employ
Speaker 2: and pay to go and create revolutions all over the world.
Speaker 2: That's a real thing. I would encourage you to check
Speaker 2: out the Mike Benz Joe Rogan interview if you want
Speaker 2: to get some of these details. It's fucking mind blowing.
Speaker 6: Goal identify key ac to train and spread desired messaging.
Speaker 6: This is on NATO's we pay for NATO. We paid
Speaker 6: for this to be pitched. Now here's where some of
Speaker 6: the story got misreported. I don't know that anyone from
Speaker 6: NATO directly reached out to Taylor Swift or her campaign
Speaker 6: to do that. I'd this and if they did, this
Speaker 6: would not be formalized in a formal Pentagon grant or
Speaker 6: quid pro quote. But I should note look at who
Speaker 6: the biggest sponsor of south By Southwest is in Texas.
Speaker 6: Now it's the military. Go ahead and look up the
Speaker 6: scandal if you want about south By Southwest Pentagon funding.
Speaker 6: They've taken over the music industry because it's hearts and
Speaker 6: minds work to promote street protests and political reform. I
Speaker 6: mean literally writing rap albums to get people to take
Speaker 6: to the streets and pull off the exact riot that
Speaker 6: the State Department wants to destabilize the country.
Speaker 2: But it's not just that they also fund the entire
Speaker 2: NGO framework to the tune of billions, and that are
Speaker 2: responsible for, amongst other things, making everybody gay. Being a
Speaker 2: little facetious, but it definitely emphasized the woke mind virus,
Speaker 2: and it helped to spread that to the rest of
Speaker 2: the world as well as domestically. But the other thing
Speaker 2: it did is it funded all of the religious NGOs, Christian, Catholic, Jewish,
Speaker 2: all of them to assist migrants in their trek from
Speaker 2: the Third World into not just America, but Europe as well.
Speaker 2: As I've said before, and I've explained this in the past,
Speaker 2: but I usually just talked about the NGOs or I
Speaker 2: would talk about State Department. I didn't connect that intermediary middleman,
Speaker 2: which was USAAD, the funding source for all this. That's
Speaker 2: what was really happening, is that we were being robbed
Speaker 2: to then hand over billions of dollars to USAAD, which
Speaker 2: then handed over billions of dollars to NGOs, which then,
Speaker 2: via guidance from the State Department, was funding our own
Speaker 2: invasion and ultimately our own destruction. And I feel like
Speaker 2: for the first time, all of the dots have been connected.
Speaker 2: The entire picture is in front of us, and we
Speaker 2: all get to look at it, and some people are
Speaker 2: gonna look at it and they're gonna say, I can't
Speaker 2: believe what I'm looking at. I'm gonna go back to sleep.
Speaker 2: And I think another huge percentage of this country is
Speaker 2: looking at it right now and they're going, this is
Speaker 2: the worst thing I've ever looked at. I'm mad, and
Speaker 2: we're gonna stop this. And that's what I'm trying to
Speaker 2: feed off of. That energy, that reform kind of you know,
Speaker 2: peaceful revolution energy. That's what we need to capitalize on
Speaker 2: right now. You cannot let these moments pass because I've
Speaker 2: been talking about this stuff for years, but it didn't
Speaker 2: really have the traction that it does now as a
Speaker 2: consequence of Elon Musk and Doge bringing all of this
Speaker 2: information to light and him blasting it out ten times
Speaker 2: a day where he's like, we spend this on this,
Speaker 2: this was for that, and everyone's like, what what the
Speaker 2: fuck are you talking about? And me and Mike Ben's
Speaker 2: and other people are like, yeah, this is what we've
Speaker 2: been talking about, Like, this is what's up, this is
Speaker 2: why everything's fucked. Okay, So we have a choice right now.
Speaker 2: Do we look at all of the things that are
Speaker 2: fucked up because of USID and just go back to
Speaker 2: sleep or say, oh, we'll just stop it, but like
Speaker 2: maybe we will, maybe we won't, or do we get
Speaker 2: serious as fuck right now because we have an opportunity
Speaker 2: to save Western civilization. I'm going with the latter. This
Speaker 2: is a once in a lifetime opportunity to reverse course
Speaker 2: on a as I've said many times, an existential trajectory, which
Speaker 2: is what we were on, which is ultimately why I
Speaker 2: voted for Trump. Now, I didn't expect him to fucking
Speaker 2: do everything that he's done, nor as fast as he's
Speaker 2: done it, but like this is almost as much as
Speaker 2: I could have hoped for. It's almost my dream scenario.
Speaker 2: I mean, he's openly talking about having Ron Paul audit
Speaker 2: the Federal Reserve. Elon's saying it multiple times, got THEO
Speaker 2: Vaughn stand up comic, one of the best, one of
Speaker 2: the biggest comics in the country. He's saying it is
Speaker 2: fucking nuts.
Speaker 3: This is nuts.
Speaker 2: I mean, if you can just flash back to my
Speaker 2: attitude ninety to one hundred and twenty days ago, when
Speaker 2: it's like we're right on the precipice of World War three.
Speaker 2: Trump just got shot. It's like all of this madness
Speaker 2: is transpiring. There's very little optimism, I mean from my
Speaker 2: end at least, like just for the trajectory of the country.
Speaker 2: Life still you know, optimistic, but for the trajectory of things.
Speaker 2: It was like, this looks fucked. If Kamala Harris gets
Speaker 2: in there, we are super fucked. You think they're going
Speaker 2: to negotiate peace with Russia. Absolutely not. You think we're
Speaker 2: ever going to, you know, have a real election where
Speaker 2: a distant figure like Donald Trump gets back in No,
Speaker 2: absolutely not, like it would have been fucking cemented off.
Speaker 2: And by the grace of God, man, I really do
Speaker 2: feel like we dodged a bullet, both literally and metaphorically.
Speaker 2: And I've just never been more hopeful, you know, And
Speaker 2: I'm I'm certain I'm gonna be let down. When Trump
Speaker 2: talked about owning Gaza, I was let down. That was
Speaker 2: that concerned the hell out of me. And there's gonna
Speaker 2: be many things he does that I hate, no doubt
Speaker 2: about it. But in terms of the positives, Department of
Speaker 2: Education gone USA d shut it down.
Speaker 3: This is fucking good shit. Fet A Reserve audited by
Speaker 3: Ron Pole Oh yeah, what does anybody feel me on this?
Speaker 3: Do you feel how special this moment is? I mean,
Speaker 3: it's amazing, it's amazing. I've never got.
Speaker 2: To just express like beer joining you guys. And I know,
Speaker 2: I know I'm gonna get mocked for just being optimistic
Speaker 2: or hopeful, but like, damn, dude, this is this is
Speaker 2: a real shot, like a real once in a lifetime opportunity.
Speaker 2: And I'm just gonna keep pressuring. I'm gonna keep trying
Speaker 2: to get as much out of this as we possibly can.
Speaker 2: I hope you guys joined me in that. You never
Speaker 2: really had a shot before you do. Now they're listening
Speaker 2: when he says we're going to own Guzza and we
Speaker 2: all fire back.
Speaker 3: Fuck that.
Speaker 2: He'll He'll change, he will. That's how they That's how
Speaker 2: this administration functions. They're the most influenzablele.
Speaker 3: Administration in your lifetime.
Speaker 2: Your opinion does matter this go around.
Speaker 3: Not everything.
Speaker 2: You're not gonna get everything you want, but in terms
Speaker 2: of having some some weight on the scale of the
Speaker 2: trajectory of things, we have it now. Don't take your
Speaker 2: finger off the scale. Push harder, tilt this as hard
Speaker 2: as you can towards liberty, For instance, I had a
Speaker 2: a tweet that went crazy viral, and I actually explained
Speaker 2: this on my episode of Dangerous with Topping David earlier today.
Speaker 2: But I just want to explain my rationale for these
Speaker 2: things because I think it's it's it might be interesting
Speaker 2: for some of you that are on Twitter and like
Speaker 2: why does Clinton post things he does and how does
Speaker 2: it function and why does it go viral? Things of
Speaker 2: that nature. Right, So, my concern for the longest time
Speaker 2: has been that it's gonna be real hard to.
Speaker 3: Get like equal.
Speaker 2: Genuine justice when it comes to these disclosures and seeing
Speaker 2: who's responsible for what and like, are we you know,
Speaker 2: and especially after Biden pardoned Fauci and his entire family
Speaker 2: and all these people, it's like, are we actually gonna
Speaker 2: get justice? So my big concern at this point is that, well,
Speaker 2: we have all of these disclosures that are happening, these
Speaker 2: deep dive investigations and the finances about USAID and NGO
Speaker 2: networks and how this all functions. Are we just gonna
Speaker 2: pretend as if this was a Democrat thing? Are we
Speaker 2: gonna pretend that, because you know, if the Mike Johnson's
Speaker 2: of the world, who by the way greenlit all of
Speaker 2: the billions of dollars that went to Ukraine.
Speaker 3: All of it.
Speaker 2: Uh, do you think he's gonna wanna throw himself under
Speaker 2: the bus when it comes out that maybe there were
Speaker 2: some kickbacks to those trants of money that we were
Speaker 2: shipping off Ukraine.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't think so. I don't think so.
Speaker 2: I don't think any of the Republicans that signed off
Speaker 2: on that stuff are going to want to have real
Speaker 2: disclosures and real come to Jesus moments when it comes
Speaker 2: to who was getting paid from all of the corruption
Speaker 2: and theft in this government. So this is what I said,
Speaker 2: there's a misconception about Trump supporters. I know it's kind
Speaker 2: of ridiculous for me to be talking with any sort
Speaker 2: of authoritative nature on Trump supporters, given that I only
Speaker 2: became a Trump supporter four months ago. But I said,
Speaker 2: there's a misconception about Trump voters that should be put
Speaker 2: to rest. We aren't just interested. I know, it still
Speaker 2: makes me laugh, aren't We aren't just interested in seeing
Speaker 2: corrupt democrats forced out of power. We would actually like
Speaker 2: to see them prosecuted along with And this is the key,
Speaker 2: This is where I'm setting the narrative frame along with
Speaker 2: every Republican swamp monster that sold this country out, all
Speaker 2: of them. No, half a million views, fifty six thousand likes.
Speaker 2: You can laugh it off like Clint, Oh, you're gonna
Speaker 2: pretend like you're some diehard Trump supporter. Yeah, no I'm not.
Speaker 2: But I do know Trump supporters, and I do know
Speaker 2: how they think, and and I did vote for them,
Speaker 2: So I'm not lying. But like the frame I'm setting
Speaker 2: there is, I want to I want to shift the
Speaker 2: Overton window from Democrats bad corrupt criminal thieves to the
Speaker 2: uniparty bad corrupt criminal thieves. I don't want to just
Speaker 2: get disclosures and get resignations from these people. I want
Speaker 2: prosecutions of everybody, now, everybody that actually committed crimes. I'm
Speaker 2: not on some like witch hunt here. I just genuinely
Speaker 2: believe that there's our government is filled with fucking criminals.
Speaker 2: Unless you prosecute them, this shit won't stop. So I've
Speaker 2: been saying this for years. There's not any shift from
Speaker 2: my perspective, but I'm just trying to popularize it amongst
Speaker 2: the Trump supporting base, the Maga mah Maha thing, to
Speaker 2: make it more likely that that's the actual outcome we witness,
Speaker 2: because if we witness that outcome, it's it's the ultimate win.
Speaker 2: It's the ultimate win. Like that's that's as much as
Speaker 2: we could hope for.
Speaker 3: Now. You're not going to get Fauci.
Speaker 2: But since Fauchi has a pardon, you might get him
Speaker 2: to testify. You might, if you apply enough pressure, you
Speaker 2: might to get him to actually explain where the bodies
Speaker 2: are buried, why, why did you do what you did,
Speaker 2: Who did you do it for? Who paid you? Now,
Speaker 2: if I'm right about where his funding comes from, he
Speaker 2: may never speak regardless even if it even if he's
Speaker 2: put into prison, because his life may be in jeopardy.
Speaker 2: Like that's a distinct possibility. As Anna Paulina Luna just
Speaker 2: came out yesterday and she said this.
Speaker 7: Talks News alert. The House Oversight Committee has just launched
Speaker 7: a new task force aimed at uncovering the truth behind
Speaker 7: some of America's biggest mysteries. The task Force on the
Speaker 7: classification of federal secrets is being led by Florida Congresswoman
Speaker 7: Annapolina Luna and they'll be looking into the assassinations of
Speaker 7: jfk Ok and Martin Luther King as well as releasing
Speaker 7: nine to eleven files and Jeffrey Epstein's client list up first,
Speaker 7: the JFK assassination. Luna is confident Lee Harvey Oswald didn't
Speaker 7: act alone.
Speaker 8: Based on what I've been seeing so far, the initial
Speaker 8: hearing that was actually held here in Congress was actually
Speaker 8: faulty in the single bowl theory. I believe that there
Speaker 8: were two shooters, and we should be finding more information
Speaker 8: as we are able to gain access into the skiff,
Speaker 8: hopefully before the files are actually released to the public.
Speaker 2: Now that's kind of a big deal. It's a big
Speaker 2: deal in the sense that what they're saying is that
Speaker 2: JFK who. By the way, Yeah, it's at this point
Speaker 2: most people doubt the official story, but I think most
Speaker 2: people still believe that Oswald was the loan shooter. Now
Speaker 2: you have a sitting congressman saying that she has seen
Speaker 2: documentation that makes her believe that there was multiple shooters
Speaker 2: whoa that he did not work alone, but he was
Speaker 2: also not firing alone. That's a big, big disclosure, and
Speaker 2: if they actually prove it out, that's revelatory in a
Speaker 2: sense that like you don't go back from that. There's
Speaker 2: like a before disclosure after disclosure, like, you can't go
Speaker 2: back from that, especially if that disclosure includes that one
Speaker 2: of the shooters or more were employed by the United
Speaker 2: States government or intell agencies specifically, if that comes out,
Speaker 2: my goodness. Now, let me say this, I am not
Speaker 2: fond of having these tasks forced to deal with disclosures.
Speaker 2: Just give me the information, let me read it, let
Speaker 2: me see what you have, and let me see what
Speaker 2: I think happened. Because I don't trust any of you,
Speaker 2: and that includes miss Paulina Luna. I don't trust you. Sorry,
Speaker 2: it concerns me that they're going to have her I
Speaker 2: don't know, reviewing and deciding what we get to see.
Speaker 2: Just give it to us. It's been sixty one years.
Speaker 2: Give us the information.
Speaker 3: For God's sakes.
Speaker 2: It's not too much to ask. It was our president
Speaker 2: that got killed. Shouldn't we know who and why? Yeah,
Speaker 2: we ought to at this point, Jesus Christ. So the
Speaker 2: fact that it's been hidden has always led me to
Speaker 2: believe who was behind it was not who we were told.
Speaker 2: And you can guess who I think was behind it.
Speaker 2: So I want answers, and I want full disclosure, and
Speaker 2: I don't want any curation of this information to the public.
Speaker 2: Let us the citizen journalists or whatever you want to
Speaker 2: call us, figure it the fuck out on our own.
Speaker 2: That would be nice. But this is a step in
Speaker 2: that direction, regardless of you know, it's imperfections. At least
Speaker 2: it's a step. And if we get that answer, and
Speaker 2: if the general public accepts the fact that, yeah, maybe
Speaker 2: the United States government was behind it, whoa big time.
Speaker 2: So anyways, why do I bring that up? Well, if
Speaker 2: I'm right about that, if I'm right about what happened
Speaker 2: to JFK and RFK and MLK and you know, these
Speaker 2: other civil rights leaders, well then Anthony Fauci has to
Speaker 2: be aware of that too, And Anthony Fauci must know that.
Speaker 2: As I've said many times, I don't think Fauci was
Speaker 2: like the ringleader. I don't think he was the top
Speaker 2: guy that was dictating.
Speaker 3: All of this.
Speaker 2: I don't think that. But he was the figurehead, and
Speaker 2: he was the one that was represented to us as
Speaker 2: being the one who had the most power in our
Speaker 2: entire medical health establishment. He was king doctor or whatever.
Speaker 2: He knows for sure what happened, and he could tell
Speaker 2: us the truth. But I think also he's probably in
Speaker 2: major jeopardy even with this pardon, And I think he
Speaker 2: was probably given the pardon because he said, Hey, I'm
Speaker 2: going to squeal if you don't give it to me.
Speaker 2: If you give it to me, I'll never say a word.
Speaker 2: So my expectation is that he'll never say a word.
Speaker 2: But that doesn't mean that he won't. That doesn't mean
Speaker 2: that with enough pressure under this administration, especially if you
Speaker 2: can pierce that pardon somehow, that he won't, especially if
Speaker 2: you threaten him with perjury. If he won't tell the truth,
Speaker 2: given that he has a pardon and he can't be
Speaker 2: thrown in prison, well then you can hit him with
Speaker 2: a perjury charge. If he won't disclose what he knows. Well,
Speaker 2: that's very interesting, isn't it. I'm just saying, if you
Speaker 2: have enough people clamoring for the truth, you might get it,
Speaker 2: And you might get it from the last place you'd expected,
Speaker 2: like the lying scumbag himself, Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 3: We'll see.
Speaker 2: I think it's a very very interesting time to be alive,
Speaker 2: the most interesting time I've ever lived through. And I'm
Speaker 2: just very I'm very optimistic about this year. You know,
Speaker 2: I now doomer Clint has to come back out here
Speaker 2: for a minute. If I'm right, you know, if if
Speaker 2: this Trump team, this Doge team, is really really doing
Speaker 2: what they say they're doing, they are going to they
Speaker 2: are going to disclose to us so much criminality in
Speaker 2: our government that I don't know how the government, like
Speaker 2: the established government, the deep state, can survive it. Like
Speaker 2: it'll be so damaging to them, they will be obliterated.
Speaker 2: So do you I think they're just going to accept
Speaker 2: that fate lying down? Kind of doubt it if you're
Speaker 2: if you're the CIA, or the FBI, or the military
Speaker 2: in dose true complex, or a congressional representative that's been
Speaker 2: in there for forty years who went from being worth
Speaker 2: fifty grand to fifty million, do you think you're just
Speaker 2: gonna accept your time in San Quentin? Probably not, not
Speaker 2: without a fight. So I am super nervous, super nervous
Speaker 2: about extra judicial means of addressing this a la JFK.
Speaker 2: I won't say anything more than that, you know exactly
Speaker 2: what I'm saying. I am ner thus and I mean
Speaker 2: the good news is that I think that after the
Speaker 2: multiple attempts on Trump's life, he has already re configured
Speaker 2: his security detail. I know Elon's got a crazy security
Speaker 2: detail too. I think that's that's our best hope to
Speaker 2: avoid that is just an immense security detail that is
Speaker 2: like a world class even that is obviously not infallible.
Speaker 2: So it's gonna it's gonna require some some luck, I think,
Speaker 2: but it's gonna be the most anxiety inducing four years
Speaker 2: of your life and mind, because if they were to
Speaker 2: succeed in that, I don't even wanna. I don't even
Speaker 2: want to envision what that will look like or be like.
Speaker 2: And so I'm not going to I'm just gonna hope
Speaker 2: for the best, hope for continued disclosures, hope for like
Speaker 2: just the genuine aspects of you know, Trump and Elon
Speaker 2: and everything else. Like I understand, they all have their
Speaker 2: own incentive structures, and they're gonna profit and they're gonna
Speaker 2: become more powerful, and like they're getting a lot out
Speaker 2: of this too. This is not just a purely altruistic maneuver.
Speaker 2: But I do believe that they have risked a lot,
Speaker 2: and I do believe that they're risking their lives in
Speaker 2: taking this path, even if it's just a path to
Speaker 2: you know, make themselves you know self and grandizing and
Speaker 2: uh and increasing in power and wealth and everything else.
Speaker 2: Maybe that's all that's driving them to do it. Maybe
Speaker 2: I don't think so. Personally, I think there is a
Speaker 2: sense of duty that I see, particularly in Elon when
Speaker 2: he talks about this stuff. I think that his time
Speaker 2: growing up in South Africa. I don't know when he
Speaker 2: came over here, but I know that he you know,
Speaker 2: he paid attention to South Africa once he became an American,
Speaker 2: and he's seen what's transpiring there, and then to have
Speaker 2: his son or I think it was his daughter transition.
Speaker 2: I don't know one of his kids transition transition that
Speaker 2: feel that loss. I think he's functioning in a way
Speaker 2: that's very much in alignment with his origin story, in
Speaker 2: his background that makes it seem sincere to me. Can
Speaker 2: I prove that, No, But his actions speak to someone
Speaker 2: who's on a mission, who dreams big and takes risks
Speaker 2: and goes after it in a way that's very dangerous ultimately,
Speaker 2: But can you get anything truly, truly history making without
Speaker 2: taking risks, without putting yourself in danger?
Speaker 3: Not often?
Speaker 2: And he seems like he's he's built from that stock,
Speaker 2: whatever that stock is, And I hope I'm not wrong.
Speaker 2: I hope he's not just trying to create we chat
Speaker 2: and put us into his technocratic gulag. Maybe that's part
Speaker 2: of it too, But as of now, it looks like
Speaker 2: he's taken real risks, real risks with real benefits to
Speaker 2: you and I, And as long as that's the case,
Speaker 2: I'm gonna give him his due. I think it's heroic.
Speaker 2: I think what Trump has done is heroic. I think
Speaker 2: what Tulsi and Cash and Bobby have all done is heroic.
Speaker 2: And I think that we needed heroic action. We needed
Speaker 2: it now and we have a chance now.
Speaker 3: Thank you, guys so much for tuning in.
Speaker 2: If you are watching this right now on the y T,
Speaker 2: then you're not going to see the next two hours
Speaker 2: of content. If you're watching this on Rumble or listening,
Speaker 2: you're gonna listen to the premiere episode, episode number one
Speaker 2: of Dangerous rt RDS with myself, David and Top Lobster
Speaker 2: the NDS. Guys, I think you'll really enjoy it. We
Speaker 2: go deep on a bunch of this stuff, like deep
Speaker 2: in different ways. It's obviously you know it's dangerous, So
Speaker 2: it's gonna be a little, uh, a little spicy and
Speaker 2: maybe that's not for everybody, but if you're watching this
Speaker 2: on y T, I can't put that up over there,
Speaker 2: so you're gonna have to either hop over to Rumble
Speaker 2: or subscribe to Liberty Lockdown via Apple Podcasts, Spotify or
Speaker 2: wherever else and you can listen to listen to the premiere.
Speaker 2: I thought it went great. We just got done recording
Speaker 2: it a little bit ago. Really interesting conversation and I
Speaker 2: think I think you'll enjoy it, So check that out.
Speaker 2: You can subscribe on YouTube right now Dangerous rtrds, and
Speaker 2: make sure you do leave a comment down below if
Speaker 2: I got anything wrong, like subscribe and share this around.
Speaker 2: I appreciate you guys so much. Thank you for letting
Speaker 2: me take a week off to collect my thoughts and
Speaker 2: see why I'm having I guess speaker's block as opposed
Speaker 2: to writer's block. It wasn't really that I had speaker's block.
Speaker 2: It was just like, it's like, what's an interesting angle
Speaker 2: to talk about this stuff? Like things are good, you know,
Speaker 2: like it's just it's good stuff. So I just decided
Speaker 2: I'd come on here and tell you why I think
Speaker 2: it's good. You know, what a what a shift from
Speaker 2: the first three years. I've been doing this show where
Speaker 2: I just got on here and pitched about everything.
Speaker 3: It's like, oh, this is.
Speaker 2: All fucking awesome and uh and let's hope it keeps
Speaker 2: going that way.
Speaker 3: See you guys soon. Please from Africa. I'm down. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 3: what's youre going up here?
Speaker 9: Because I think I was looking for you? What're you
Speaker 9: looking for me for?
Speaker 1: I thank you?
Speaker 3: You got the wrong dome man, Yeah.
Speaker 4: The right person.
Speaker 10: Maybe it's wrong antress. Please not female. There's a different
Speaker 10: female and woman. Female is just for your pussy, for
Speaker 10: your deed and money. I'm from Africa.
Speaker 11: Clean.
Speaker 10: You see that it's icy in America.
Speaker 3: The woman work, Then.
Speaker 10: In Africa, woman doesn't work.
Speaker 11: The job is taking care of the man.
Speaker 3: This is dangerous. I'm not condemning these people. I'm not
Speaker 3: saying that they're bad people. I'm saying that they're dumb.
Speaker 2: Okay, you haven't figured out that you're being lied to
Speaker 2: by this machine yet.
Speaker 3: You're a fucking idiot and I can't help you anymore.
Speaker 12: Aliens, dollar collapse, demolishing of the deep state, just because
Speaker 12: they've given you as a conspiracy there is everything you wanted.
Speaker 12: Don't go on a victory tour just yet and strengthen
Speaker 12: your relationship with God.
Speaker 9: I know that we're almost in World War three.
Speaker 11: I just don't care that he's retarded and everything above
Speaker 11: that is a disrespect to God.
Speaker 4: Somebody though, I can fix this, and I'm starting to
Speaker 4: think about having to eat my neighbors.
Speaker 3: Welcome, ladies and gentlemen to dangerous retards. We're here, baby,
Speaker 3: what's up, gentlemen?
Speaker 9: What's up? Guys?
Speaker 11: That was intense a little bit of editing, but I
Speaker 11: think we nailed it. This is perfection. We're ready to
Speaker 11: run through the next seven years of content creation.
Speaker 9: Do you know.
Speaker 12: I don't know when this episode is exactly going to air,
Speaker 12: but I thought that we would bring it in with
Speaker 12: some romance. And I really want to say that in
Speaker 12: the middle of kind of like getting rid of all
Speaker 12: the migrants, I think it's important to highlight they do
Speaker 12: have some traditional values. You know, I don't see this
Speaker 12: from women in the West anymore. There's a lot of feminism.
Speaker 9: David.
Speaker 11: She's standing next to him with the seven inch bowie knife,
Speaker 11: saying that I'm going to take care of you.
Speaker 9: No, this is some voodoo hoodoo shit man, that's called passion. Dude,
Speaker 9: who do shit?
Speaker 12: Can I just say on that topic, my we know
Speaker 12: for a fact my dad's wife boils her panties in
Speaker 12: his coffee and that's how she She literally has done
Speaker 12: voodoo on my father.
Speaker 9: That's real.
Speaker 12: What I haven't ever brought that up. Actually, I haven't
Speaker 12: brought it up on Nehlin squad.
Speaker 9: Yeah, that's it.
Speaker 12: And look, I just want to say, she's from a
Speaker 12: drink world country. I'm a better relationship with love than
Speaker 12: within it.
Speaker 2: In the West day, you need to back up and
Speaker 2: explain yourself questions, he's drinking it is she filtering the
Speaker 2: coffee with her panties?
Speaker 9: What do you? What do you do?
Speaker 12: Apparently what you do is it's a it's a form
Speaker 12: of a love spell. So if you want to and
Speaker 12: this is for the ladies in the audience, if you
Speaker 12: want to enameor a man, what you would do is
Speaker 12: you find his hot beverage of choice, whether this is
Speaker 12: coffee or tea or.
Speaker 9: What have you.
Speaker 12: When you when you're making it, you just drop your
Speaker 12: panties in there, drop your panties in the drink. And
Speaker 12: I don't know what happens. I don't know what kind
Speaker 12: of alchemical process takes place. But apparently you will have
Speaker 12: a man on the hook if he drinks your panty water, and.
Speaker 2: The details to the al chemical process you end up with,
Speaker 2: you know, fragments of her shit.
Speaker 11: So that's that's how you end up the HHS director
Speaker 11: talking like, because.
Speaker 9: I'm too much burgury by magacines. Congratulations, Yeah, that's what
Speaker 9: it is speaking of.
Speaker 2: This actually takes us to our first topic, which is
Speaker 2: RFK Junior has been confirmed.
Speaker 3: It finally happened.
Speaker 2: Well, in fairness, it looks as if it's assured because
Speaker 2: it was fifty Republicans that voted, so that puts it
Speaker 2: to a tiebreaker, which means that you will have jd
Speaker 2: Vance being the tiebreaking vote to get him in there.
Speaker 2: So it's all but a foregone conclusion at this point.
Speaker 2: I personally am excited about it. I think that it's weird.
Speaker 2: It's like, you may actually be surprised by this top
Speaker 2: It's weird for me, who's you know, diehard libertarian to
Speaker 2: be like, oh, yeah, I really want, you know, the
Speaker 2: government involved in making us healthy. But I think that
Speaker 2: the bigger point is that the government has been involved
Speaker 2: in making us unhealthy, and I just want that process
Speaker 2: to stop. Uh and I think that RFK Junior actually
Speaker 2: has the capacity to do that. So I'm pretty excited
Speaker 2: about it. You guys are you know, tend to be
Speaker 2: jaded and just mock him for his gravelly voice.
Speaker 3: Do you see any positives from it?
Speaker 11: He's he's got an awful I wanted to bring up
Speaker 11: on this subject because I feel like, as things are
Speaker 11: moving in twenty twenty five, I'm rediscovering this, uh, this
Speaker 11: gay libertarian side of me, not not to be a libertarian,
Speaker 11: but to argue about politics. Maybe it's taking part in
Speaker 11: this show. Perhaps I should quit, but uh.
Speaker 9: Ch episode one, you motherfuckers.
Speaker 11: Five minutes in Chase Oliver was tweeting and he got
Speaker 11: some pretty good traction from the libertarian crowd.
Speaker 9: He was tweeting about how.
Speaker 11: The regulation on uh not allowing big pharmaceutical, big farmer
Speaker 11: companies to advertise and he was like, do we just
Speaker 11: want more regulation? And I'm like no, Like, you don't
Speaker 11: understand these are these are already government entities, and like,
Speaker 11: I'm okay with whatever means necessary, whatever whatever we have
Speaker 11: to do to prevent them from continuing to lie and
Speaker 11: spread their propaganda. So yes, we can use the government
Speaker 11: for that and certainly he's what departments?
Speaker 9: Is he in charge of?
Speaker 11: CDC, NIH, N, I, A, I, D F, HHS is
Speaker 11: the boss of all of them.
Speaker 9: It's insane.
Speaker 11: Everything that lied to you, everything that made your life
Speaker 11: hell during COVID, is now controlled by one gravelly voiced Kennedy.
Speaker 9: Old one old.
Speaker 12: So the other day, I'm watching something with my son
Speaker 12: and he's being exposed to those pharmaceutical commercials that we
Speaker 12: have here in America, and I'm explaining to him that
Speaker 12: this is not the case everywhere else in the world.
Speaker 9: And then I'm having him watch, and I go, you
Speaker 9: know what's interesting.
Speaker 12: Watch the way they smile, they hold hands, they skip
Speaker 12: through a field, an old man holds his grandson above
Speaker 12: his head, and they're playing this wonderful, touching music and
Speaker 12: listen to what they're saying as and that's when they're
Speaker 12: listing off, you know, the the litany of side effects,
Speaker 12: and it's like, may cause anal fissures, like all these
Speaker 12: different things that you know, terminal cancers and things like that.
Speaker 9: And he goes, why are they playing nice.
Speaker 12: Music when it's happening, And I go, I don't know, man,
Speaker 12: it's like a hypnosis. But I mean, look, you guys
Speaker 12: know me, I'm not really that uh that that sharp
Speaker 12: on my politics.
Speaker 9: When when how does this go? When do we start
Speaker 9: rounding up and killing people? My god, and we're off
Speaker 9: YouTube already. Is that not what's happening?
Speaker 2: No, I think that was like chapter two of Project
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five, So you may have to wait to
Speaker 2: twenty twenty six five.
Speaker 9: It's a lot of sitting around and waiting.
Speaker 2: Yeah, look, I uh, I'm of two minds on this, Like, Yes,
Speaker 2: my general instinct is yes, I don't want the government
Speaker 2: curtailing what we're allowed to advertise. And I, you know,
Speaker 2: I believe in drug legalization, so certainly if I believe
Speaker 2: in drug legalization, then you ought to be able to
Speaker 2: advertise legal drugs. However, I I think that your point
Speaker 2: is well taken, and it's one that I had to
Speaker 2: make to the libertarians and to Chase Oliver specifically when
Speaker 2: I was moderating as debate. Is that you're behaving as
Speaker 2: if we actually exist in a free market when we don't,
Speaker 2: and your prescriptions for no pun intended for remedying what
Speaker 2: ails us are all misguided because you're not actually considering
Speaker 2: the chessboard like you don't actually understand the game that's
Speaker 2: being played. The game that's being played is that, like
Speaker 2: when big tech is deplatforming US, they aren't doing it
Speaker 2: because they're private entities that just want to be friendly
Speaker 2: to advertisers. They're doing it because ESG exists. They're doing
Speaker 2: it because the government is emailing them and threatening them
Speaker 2: that they're doing it because the government is actually bringing
Speaker 2: the tech CEOs up on Capitol Hill and threatening to
Speaker 2: nationalize their companies if they don't censor. So this is
Speaker 2: the same phenomenon that happens in big Pharma, but actually,
Speaker 2: in some ways even worse because they have liability protections,
Speaker 2: they lobby so heavily, they essentially own eighty percent of
Speaker 2: our politicians. I mean, the the only reason that you
Speaker 2: got fifty Republicans to vote for RFK Junior is because
Speaker 2: they knew it was a political death sentence, not to yep,
Speaker 2: that that every single Maga, Maha, libertarian whatever, would have
Speaker 2: spent the rest of their existence just trying to get
Speaker 2: these people out of power. And the only reason that
Speaker 2: you got one Republican to vote against him, which was
Speaker 2: Mitch McConnell, is because he's nearly dead.
Speaker 9: Because he had that literally had a stroke.
Speaker 3: Yep, yeah, stroke is this number?
Speaker 12: It's like number seven or something that he's had as
Speaker 12: far as public strokes go, where he just completely zombies
Speaker 12: out and all of a sudden his handlers have to
Speaker 12: come in and escort him off stage. I mean, man,
Speaker 12: that guy he just continuously shuts down, and let's let's.
Speaker 2: Give him a little credited like that's right, or die shit, bro,
Speaker 2: Like yeah, it's a great point.
Speaker 3: Like you know, if you.
Speaker 2: Ever see a black person actually showing up at work
Speaker 2: and just shutting down like that, You're like, man, this
Speaker 2: dude's really committed.
Speaker 3: It makes you don't even come.
Speaker 11: Makes you wonder what they have on him, right, Like,
Speaker 11: because the last one I saw that he didn't even stroke,
Speaker 11: but his legs stopped working. He was just like walking.
Speaker 11: He was like shit, like these don't bend anymore, and
Speaker 11: he fell down. He's trying to get himself up, but
Speaker 11: his legs just don't work. If my legs didn't work,
Speaker 11: I'm like, hey, I can't come into work today. But
Speaker 11: this dude's like I don't think he really cares about
Speaker 11: his job. I just think he cares about people not
Speaker 11: finding out all the kids he banged or whatever.
Speaker 9: I don't know, baby, he drank. Yeah, Why keep doing this?
Speaker 11: Why keep doing this for so long when you're not
Speaker 11: making any meaningful effect? You're not really ideological. Your whole
Speaker 11: job here is to disturb and throw a monkey wrench
Speaker 11: in whatever the Republicans are trying to do, which means
Speaker 11: that you are blackmailed, unless you're just ideologically captured from
Speaker 11: the other side, in which case very nihilistic.
Speaker 12: I mean, look in Japan, they look at if you
Speaker 12: fall asleep on the job, that's considered a good thing.
Speaker 12: I've heard at least, And so it's very common for
Speaker 12: people because they work so hard and they work so
Speaker 12: many hours. This is man who is dedicated to preserving
Speaker 12: the country that he grew up in. And you know,
Speaker 12: I'll be damned, or he'll be damned if he lets
Speaker 12: something like legs get in the way of that.
Speaker 9: He's just gonna keep marching forward, dude.
Speaker 2: I mean serious answer to this, I think is that,
Speaker 2: I mean, there's a there's a possibility that Mitch McConnell's
Speaker 2: is just a literal demon. There's also the possibility that
Speaker 2: there's also the possibility that once you've once you sold
Speaker 2: your soul, you know, not even spiritually, but just financially
Speaker 2: blackmail wise for fifty fucking straight years that you just
Speaker 2: don't know how to not like yeah, like and you
Speaker 2: just kind of and you're like, I'm gonna ride this
Speaker 2: bitch to the wheels fall off, Like I'm an evil
Speaker 2: son of a bitch. What am I gonna go just
Speaker 2: go home and be with my grandkids that I haven't
Speaker 2: talked to in a decade, Like, not not gonna happen.
Speaker 2: So I'm just gonna keep showing up in DC and
Speaker 2: ripping the American people off. Or there's a potential that
Speaker 2: there's you know, but not not blackmail on a hymn,
Speaker 2: because I doubt he cares about his you know, reputation
Speaker 2: when he's going to be dead in three months. It's
Speaker 2: probably that his family has been threatened.
Speaker 3: I'll tell you what.
Speaker 12: Between him and Biden, it seems that some aspect of
Speaker 12: our government, whether it be the deep state or some
Speaker 12: shadowy element, has figured out how to reanimate corpses. And
Speaker 12: I think we're just seeing this on loop, like they're
Speaker 12: just doing it over and over again.
Speaker 9: They're like they're like, clear, bring Mitch back.
Speaker 3: We gotta gotta vote down the pharma.
Speaker 12: You know, figure out a trick, and then you just
Speaker 12: kind of keep doing that trick over and over again,
Speaker 12: Like this must have just happened because we keep getting
Speaker 12: these non functioning, you know, automatons that haven't had the
Speaker 12: bugs worked out of him yet, appearing on the world
Speaker 12: stage and dictating a legislation for the future of our country.
Speaker 9: It's a lot of fun, but it's kind of an
Speaker 9: old trick.
Speaker 11: Now realistically, like this is all fun and games, but
Speaker 11: when you see somebody oppose the group and stick, it's
Speaker 11: almost brief, right, because there's like fifty Republicans and he's
Speaker 11: the one that says, no, what do you think he knows?
Speaker 11: Like is he betting on the other side here to
Speaker 11: because clearly that is it's it's either tone deaf or
Speaker 11: he knows something that we don't know.
Speaker 9: Well.
Speaker 2: I mean, I don't think they ever know definitively how
Speaker 2: the votes are going to go.
Speaker 3: I mean, you.
Speaker 2: Always there's this assumption that they all work in tandem
Speaker 2: and everybody knows exactly what's happening, and they're all in
Speaker 2: the same, you know, exact game plan that I don't
Speaker 2: think that's real. I mean a good example of that
Speaker 2: was actually when Matt Gates got rid of the Speaker
Speaker 2: of the House. But like, I don't think anybody actually
Speaker 2: expected that gambit to work. It did, and it still
Speaker 2: ended mcgaate's political career despite the fact that he was
Speaker 2: successful in it. So I think when you when you
Speaker 2: go rogue, it has the potential to, you know, change history.
Speaker 2: So I think Mitch McConnell voted no with the expectation
Speaker 2: that every Democrat would also vote, know, which they did,
Speaker 2: and then you would just need one more Republican dissident
Speaker 2: who's owned by pharma to step up.
Speaker 3: And maybe he was having a conversation.
Speaker 2: With one of them and they were like, I'm thinking,
Speaker 2: I'm going to so if you if you vote no,
Speaker 2: I might I might run in your tailwind.
Speaker 3: And then they didn't.
Speaker 9: I was just out there all alone.
Speaker 3: Let me.
Speaker 12: I want to go back to something you said before. Clinton,
Speaker 12: is this idea that these pharmaceutical companies have the the
Speaker 12: right to be able to advertise whatever their product is.
Speaker 9: And I can understand that logic, but I have a question.
Speaker 12: Then it's like, what do we do about this as
Speaker 12: a country here in the West, We're you know, so
Speaker 12: heavily inundated with SSRIs and and uh. I think it's
Speaker 12: it's like we're experiencing this mental health crisis, but I
Speaker 12: suspect that a large element of that mental health health
Speaker 12: crisis is this self diagnosis thing that we're seeing going on.
Speaker 12: So it's become quite trendy to identify yourself as you know,
Speaker 12: whatever it is, neurodivergent, being on the spectrum having ADHD,
Speaker 12: I'm I'm bipolar, I'm depressed, and a lot of people,
Speaker 12: if you press them on that, it's like, well, when
Speaker 12: did you get that diagnosis?
Speaker 9: I'm like, well, I haven't.
Speaker 12: I just recognized all the symptoms in myself because I
Speaker 12: either saw it on TV or it's become popular to
Speaker 12: talk about online one way or another.
Speaker 9: I think it's hugely detrimental to be self diagnosing.
Speaker 12: And what I recognize is if you're sitting on the
Speaker 12: sofa and this advertisement comes on and it lists a
Speaker 12: laundry list of symptoms that you might potentially have, and
Speaker 12: if you have these symptoms, then this might be the
Speaker 12: medication for you. I don't know how you're gonna untrain
Speaker 12: a person to not listen to that laundry list and
Speaker 12: then be able to because some of it is so generalized.
Speaker 9: I heard one recently.
Speaker 12: It's like, do you have headaches or you know, fatigue,
Speaker 12: things of that nature, or anxiety. It's like a catch all.
Speaker 12: You know, either're saying things that are so generalized. Sounds
Speaker 12: like the lockdowns again right where they're describing like the
Speaker 12: symptoms of COVID or one thing or another, and it's
Speaker 12: like that sounds like just regular shit, homie.
Speaker 9: So we're in the middle of this.
Speaker 2: We're a nation of hypochondriacs at this yes, in large
Speaker 2: part because of the COVID era, but also in part
Speaker 2: because of the advertising. But here's the problem. It's not
Speaker 2: just self diagnosis. If you go to a doctor, like
Speaker 2: almost any doctor in America at this point, and you
Speaker 2: say I have brain fog and I have this, and
Speaker 2: I have that, like they're going to prescribe to you
Speaker 2: the commercial you just saw. These people are fucking owned
Speaker 2: lock stock and barrel, Like it's crazy. So I think
Speaker 2: that this actually began as a as a lobbying cabal
Speaker 2: against doctors. It also the government essentially took over the
Speaker 2: I mean they didn't essentially they did. They have all
Speaker 2: the regulatory bodies that decide licensure, and they essentially molded
Speaker 2: the entire medical class, an entire generation of doctors, into
Speaker 2: being automatons, like people that just go along with whatever
Speaker 2: the regime tells them to, which we saw the consequences
Speaker 2: of that in twenty twenty and it was fucking horrific.
Speaker 2: So I don't think it's like people think it's going
Speaker 2: to be this big fix to just get rid of
Speaker 2: pharma advertising and all of a sudden, like we're not
Speaker 2: going to be the most medicated country on the planet,
Speaker 2: and I like, I don't. I don't think that's the answer.
Speaker 2: I think that our entire medical class, an entire generation
Speaker 2: of doctors, are deeply fucked up.
Speaker 11: Like, so we haven't been taught, They've only been taught,
Speaker 11: you know what, Well, what they're prescribed in these colleges
Speaker 11: which are describing, that's what they're taught exactly. They're they're
Speaker 11: prescribed to prescribe. But I mean, these these classes that
Speaker 11: are in some way, in some form, they're regulated by
Speaker 11: the government. Like my my wife, she's a nurse. So
Speaker 11: in order to become a nurse, you have to do
Speaker 11: a certain amount of prerequisites rather than do you qualify
Speaker 11: to go into nursing school.
Speaker 9: If so, yes, let's cut out the other two years.
Speaker 11: It's this is like government ship or like it's some
Speaker 11: sort of regulation where they're saying, well, they need to
Speaker 11: have X, y Z before they go in. So the
Speaker 11: government has a role in the curriculum that these doctors
Speaker 11: go through.
Speaker 9: Yep.
Speaker 11: And then they're also in debt to the government with
Speaker 11: you know, you have Obamacare, Like how do you change
Speaker 11: that group of people and what do you what do
Speaker 11: we do from here? Because they can continue.
Speaker 2: It even goes deeper than that. I mean if you
Speaker 2: actually think about, like this is why I don't like
Speaker 2: the HHS position by but why also I want someone,
Speaker 2: you know, a renegade type of figure like RFK Junior
Speaker 2: in the HHS position is because he's responsible for hundreds
Speaker 2: of billions of dollars and dispersals. Like that's what the
Speaker 2: head of HHS ultimately gets to dictate.
Speaker 3: It is.
Speaker 2: It is right up there with head of DoD like
Speaker 2: it is is the I think it's the second biggest
Speaker 2: expenditure or like individual with the responsibility of the second
Speaker 2: most amount of funds to disperse. It's fucking ridiculous. But
Speaker 2: here's here's how like the origin story begins is that
Speaker 2: as a consequence of that, you have all of these
Speaker 2: you know, oh, we're gonna cure cancer. You know, Joe
Speaker 2: Biden said that on day one of his presidency. By
Speaker 2: the way, he just left, cancer still exists, so lying fuck.
Speaker 2: But the point is is that all of these programs
Speaker 2: to cure all Zeimer's cancer, aids whatever, as a consequence
Speaker 2: of all of these government bills that sound very good
Speaker 2: and the American people go along with, is that then
Speaker 2: the federal government is entrusted with dispersing billions of dollars
Speaker 2: into these research projects that only go to doctors that
Speaker 2: are completely in alignment and will never get out of
Speaker 2: ligne with the federal government because they know that's how
Speaker 2: their fucking bread is buttered. So whatever they tell them
Speaker 2: to research, they do. However they tell them to research it,
Speaker 2: they do. So that entire like the genesis of this cycle,
Speaker 2: I think starts there. Once you have already absorbed the
Speaker 2: private financing of innovation in science, it's over. Like you
Speaker 2: you already have all of the consequences of the federal
Speaker 2: government being involved in this industry are catastrophe. And then
Speaker 2: you add into that Obamacare, which by the way, our
Speaker 2: insurance was fucked prior to that, but it got really
Speaker 2: bad after that. Yeah, my mom's a head of hospice.
Speaker 2: He's been that for decades. And it's crazy, dude. I mean,
Speaker 2: so much of health care in this country. I mean,
Speaker 2: I struggle to even call it healthcare because it's really not.
Speaker 2: But so much of healthcare and scare quotes in this
Speaker 2: country is paid for by the government. It's like there
Speaker 2: is no market signals in this anymore.
Speaker 12: I would be interested in seeing a breakdown when it
Speaker 12: comes to these large pharmaceutical companies.
Speaker 9: What is the nature of the.
Speaker 12: Medications that bring in a bulk of their income, because
Speaker 12: I wouldn't be surprised to find out that they are
Speaker 12: of an SSRI, there's some sort of a mental health
Speaker 12: related prescription that's bringing in a lot of their money.
Speaker 12: And it's I don't know. It's strange to me because
Speaker 12: the science that's behind all of the medical mental health
Speaker 12: issues basically is boiled down to a chemical imbalance of
Speaker 12: the brain.
Speaker 9: And if you look into that, it's never been proven.
Speaker 9: That's never been proven.
Speaker 12: They was talking about depressions, about ADHD as well, all
Speaker 12: these things when they're diagnosed it's it's under the prerequisite
Speaker 12: that there is a or the presumption that there is
Speaker 12: a chemical imbalance in the brain that they've never been
Speaker 12: able to determine because you can't do that. How would
Speaker 12: you determine that on a living body. You can't even
Speaker 12: check out the brain chemicals of a cadaver because all
Speaker 12: the function ceases, right, And so if you're talking about
Speaker 12: a living human being, how on earth are you going
Speaker 12: to gain access or insight to what sort of chemical
Speaker 12: imbalance they have in their brain they're alive.
Speaker 11: You can't do that, you know, So there is no balance.
Speaker 11: There's no chemical balance that is stated like in a
Speaker 11: in any kind of medical textbook. They can't go, well,
Speaker 11: you need exactly this much and exactly that much and
Speaker 11: that is a normal human being, or like that's within
Speaker 11: the normal range. They can't say that. Everybody is vastly different.
Speaker 11: But one of the things that are.
Speaker 2: They also he's also right, though they can't test it,
Speaker 2: like the entire your brain is out of balance.
Speaker 3: Is just it's fucking mumbo jumbo. And that's like, so
Speaker 3: just made it up.
Speaker 12: This is something that I think we talked to Jonathan.
Speaker 12: It might have been Jonathan outto that. We talked to top.
Speaker 12: I forget who exactly it was, but and I know
Speaker 12: the analogy that you were going for there is like,
Speaker 12: if you want to adjust the chemicals in your pool,
Speaker 12: well you know what the baseline is.
Speaker 9: You can go to a store over here. We have
Speaker 9: Pinchapenny or whatever.
Speaker 12: You can go there and they'll tell you this is
Speaker 12: where the pH balance should fall. When you're testing your waters.
Speaker 12: You go, Okay, cool, there's my constant. There's my baseline.
Speaker 12: I know where I'm at. But we have no baseline
Speaker 12: for brain chemical imbalances. And yet, like I said, I
Speaker 12: don't have the information literally back it up. I wouldn't
Speaker 12: be surprised if a bulk of the finances that are
Speaker 12: getting poured into the pharmaceutical industries are coming from mental
Speaker 12: health related prescriptions.
Speaker 2: Well it's a huge it's a huge percentage. But I
Speaker 2: mean people need to understand too. We have an entire
Speaker 2: field that is us dedicated to this.
Speaker 3: It's called psychiatry.
Speaker 2: I mean that that is all a psychiatrist does is
Speaker 2: they basically they pretend as if they're a therapist, and
Speaker 2: in the first twenty minutes of talking to you, they
Speaker 2: are ready to prescribe you drugs that are gonna change your.
Speaker 3: Brain forever, and like that's what they do.
Speaker 2: If you've ever gone to a psychiatrist, you don't have
Speaker 2: to talk to them for very long before they just
Speaker 2: start going like, hey, how quickly can I get you
Speaker 2: out of here?
Speaker 3: And how you know? What drugs do you need?
Speaker 9: And that.
Speaker 2: Like they are professional drug dealers, but like with less
Speaker 2: concern for their customers than a street dealer.
Speaker 9: And probably less understanding of the product that they're pushing.
Speaker 12: At least, if I buy cocaine or weed from you,
Speaker 12: you probably have a good idea of what this thing
Speaker 12: is doing to me. Everything that they're giving to you
Speaker 12: is experimental in so many ways. When I was a kid,
Speaker 12: they diagnosed me with ADHD. It took little to no
Speaker 12: time to get that diagnosis, and at thirteen years old,
Speaker 12: I was put on adderall and I don't know what
Speaker 12: changes that has on a body that's still developing, you know, hormonally,
Speaker 12: all these different asps.
Speaker 9: Right, but now thirty four.
Speaker 11: Years looking dangerously looking at That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 12: I'm looking I literally dangerously retarded. And it's probably because
Speaker 12: of the pharmaceuticals interview.
Speaker 11: I watched your I watched your thoughts go from one
Speaker 11: thoughts to the set probably four thoughts with boom boom
Speaker 11: boom boom, and I'm like, oh, it's because he's the
Speaker 11: holes in his brain from the adderall.
Speaker 9: He's just he's explained how thisation to how many years
Speaker 9: were you all?
Speaker 3: Uh?
Speaker 9: Not long? So I was on for like all of
Speaker 9: eighth grade.
Speaker 12: And what ended up happening is it made me incredibly irritable.
Speaker 12: I lost a ship ton of sleep, a ship ton
Speaker 12: of weight. And I actually had to go to the
Speaker 12: Scared State Straight program in order to graduate from eighth
Speaker 12: grade into high school because the irritability factor made me
Speaker 12: fight everybody. And so the only way that I was
Speaker 12: going to get through was if I went to Scared Strait.
Speaker 12: So I went to Railway State. Huon fatim black guys.
Speaker 11: Wow, this is this is a It brings me to
Speaker 11: that point of last week or the week before when
Speaker 11: he's he's at the initial hearing and Elizabeth Warren is like,
Speaker 11: do you have any idea what you're gonna do to
Speaker 11: the pharmaceutlal companies who distribute and produce vaccines, And He's just.
Speaker 9: Like, I don't really give a fuck.
Speaker 11: And but she admits openly that He's like what and
Speaker 11: she she just like said it, like bury the lead.
Speaker 11: He's like, you're gonna be in charge of agencies like
Speaker 11: the NIH and you're gonna be able to print papers that,
Speaker 11: when you bring them to court, can hold these companies liable.
Speaker 11: And I was like, well, are the papers truthful or
Speaker 11: are they not? Like, because this is what you were
Speaker 11: just saying, Clint, like, we'll have the funding now to
Speaker 11: research this stuff.
Speaker 9: And I have actual studies.
Speaker 11: So if I say on YouTube, vaccines cause childhood autism
Speaker 11: right now, they'll take us off because I'm making an
Speaker 11: unfounded claim. But I can fucking guarantee you that if
Speaker 11: we just throw a couple million dollars at this and
Speaker 11: do a quick research, you'd be like, yeah, obviously retard.
Speaker 11: I'm looking at all like that. My entire generation of
Speaker 11: Peers is autistic because we're vaxed out of our minds
Speaker 11: and mostly.
Speaker 3: If we're going here, let's go here, go ahead.
Speaker 9: It's hey, listen.
Speaker 11: I'm just say it's one of the things that he's
Speaker 11: gonna be able to look at because he has a
Speaker 11: couple of studies. I think the one with the mercury
Speaker 11: that he was like he was, he was showing how
Speaker 11: it crosses the blood brain barrier more readily, and the
Speaker 11: people just continue to put it into the vaccines as preservatives,
Speaker 11: especially like the big one would be uh the MMR
Speaker 11: measles mumps, measles mumps rebella, where they're giving you three
Speaker 11: viruses in one shot, and they're also using crazy heavy
Speaker 11: metals to preserve this stuff. Because again, it's just like
Speaker 11: our food. This it's gonna man, this is gonna make
Speaker 11: so much change. But just like our food, you can't
Speaker 11: have it sitting on the shelf for so long and
Speaker 11: so well, just fucking put poison in it.
Speaker 2: Let me interject real quick, because it's it's important. This
Speaker 2: is there's a misunderstanding about why they put mercury in it.
Speaker 2: It's it's not to preserve it. It's ave adjective or adjective.
Speaker 2: I'm blanking on the word an agitator.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: The the purpose of it is actually to inflame your
Speaker 2: immune system to get your body to respond to the
Speaker 2: dead virus. So it's not actually a preservative at all.
Speaker 2: It's thought to make the vaccine more effective. The issue
Speaker 2: is that there are arguments that in fact, the mercury
Speaker 2: doesn't leave you, and that it causes some side effects
Speaker 2: in some people that are really catastrophic. I am personally
Speaker 2: of the belief that it is highly likely that it does,
Speaker 2: that it does cause issues with certain you know, small
Speaker 2: percentage of people.
Speaker 3: I can't.
Speaker 2: But the problem is is that, like I described earlier,
Speaker 2: because so much of our medical research is funded by
Speaker 2: the federal government, and the federal government has major incentives
Speaker 2: to have certain truths stay hidden, we won't know as
Speaker 2: long as the federal government is funding it. Most likely,
Speaker 2: the only chance of the federal government funding truthful research
Speaker 2: is a weird, gravelly voice, renegade, old pervert like rfk JR.
Speaker 3: Like that's the chance.
Speaker 11: We let me tell you something there. It's like, I've
Speaker 11: seen firsthand what these things do. Every time I gave
Speaker 11: my kid one and I don't give them vaccines anymore,
Speaker 11: but every time I did, I watched their behavior, and
Speaker 11: their behavior came became erratic for two months, two weeks
Speaker 11: to a month. Well, like every time I gave to him,
Speaker 11: it was like dealing with a different kid. It's because
Speaker 11: it's fucking with their brain. They don't know how to
Speaker 11: process it's it's completely breaking the blood brain barrier. And
Speaker 11: with my son, man like, he had an injury on
Speaker 11: his leg that left a lump for almost a year
Speaker 11: and a half on his leg, and he was nonverbal
Speaker 11: till he was two. Nonverbal, didn't say a fucking word,
Speaker 11: didn't even There was at points where I had brought
Speaker 11: him to my old childhood doctor because he would be
Speaker 11: irritable and I'd be talking to him and I'm like,
Speaker 11: this guy doesn't even understand. He doesn't even know his name,
Speaker 11: and he was about one and a half. He's not
Speaker 11: processing this, he just can't. I brought him to my
Speaker 11: fucking childhood doctor and I told him, and my doctor's like,
Speaker 11: I see that he's behind on his vaccines. And I
Speaker 11: was like, are You've got to be fucking kidding me, dude, Like,
Speaker 11: I'm here for advice because my son's not speaking. Well,
Speaker 11: here's what I did. I moved out of New York,
Speaker 11: moved to Florida. We put him on a crazy heavy
Speaker 11: metal detox, among other things, and I don't know, within
Speaker 11: six months of being here, he won't shut up. Now
Speaker 11: now he's talking now, he's but like, for almost two
Speaker 11: years of his life, he lost almost two years of
Speaker 11: his life because we decided to and we did. We
Speaker 11: did a slow vaccination study too, like we were having
Speaker 11: them spread out rather than back to back to back,
Speaker 11: because they want they want to give you kids sixty
Speaker 11: four by the time they're like twelve.
Speaker 12: Right, it's insane, it really, So my question becomes, like,
Speaker 12: I know, right now we're in the middle of this,
Speaker 12: like gearing up to put all these fat.
Speaker 9: People in camps and shit, But like, when it comes to.
Speaker 12: The medical industry, the vaccine industry, the pharmaceutical industry, at
Speaker 12: what point, And this is kind of the same question
Speaker 12: with COVID, right, it's like, at what point what do
Speaker 12: you think it's going to take that's going to be
Speaker 12: dragged out into the light and the American people are
Speaker 12: going to be exposed to this sort of information for
Speaker 12: there to be some sort of call to action, right
Speaker 12: to some level of accountability, because look, we know mercury
Speaker 12: is incredibly toxic, right, that's just we know that about it,
Speaker 12: and yet for some odd reason, we're trying to we're
Speaker 12: struggling to make this correlation between the damage that's being
Speaker 12: done to our children, the spike in autism, the spike
Speaker 12: in down syndrome, and we're trying desperately not to the
Speaker 12: average person at least is trying desperately not to draw
Speaker 12: a correlation between this thing that is a known toxin
Speaker 12: and the fact that we're inoculating children with it and
Speaker 12: this spike in all these neurological diseases. What, then, do
Speaker 12: you think the American public will do, if anything, I'm
Speaker 12: inclined to say nothing fucking at all, because it's what
Speaker 12: we have a history of doing. What will we do
Speaker 12: if we are shown that there was a concerted effort
Speaker 12: to hide these things and that for generations we've been
Speaker 12: taking ourselves to the clinic and becoming retarded.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I mean this is the same question I've
Speaker 2: had about the covid era is like, are what do
Speaker 2: what do the American people do if they ever if
Speaker 2: it ever becomes like definitively known that like, yes, this
Speaker 2: was man made, maybe it was intentionally released, Maybe the
Speaker 2: vaccine wasn't good for you, you know, like like there's
Speaker 2: lots of lots of what ifs that we're still not
Speaker 2: one hundred percent confident on that if it were to
Speaker 2: become a one hundred percent confident Broadly speaking, I think
Speaker 2: that people would flip the fuck out. But I think
Speaker 2: that what you've seen is that they're half of this
Speaker 2: country is just not ever going to wake up at all,
Speaker 2: regardless of regardless of what said. So what you saw
Speaker 2: in the Trump election, in my opinion, was all of
Speaker 2: the people that have woken up to a certain extent,
Speaker 2: not all the way, but like anybody who's seen any
Speaker 2: sense of the light, all came together from all different
Speaker 2: arenas you had, like autism moms, like moms with kids
Speaker 2: with autism who don't like Trump at all, came out
Speaker 2: in millions to vote for Donald Trump because they wanted
Speaker 2: RFK Junior to be the head of AHHS. So like,
Speaker 2: I think that what you've already seen is like the
Speaker 2: people that are gonna wake up have and they have
Speaker 2: chosen to give Trump a second go with the expectation
Speaker 2: that Bobby would actually be put in it as AHHS,
Speaker 2: and shocking of all shockers, Donald Trump said, Yeah, I'm
Speaker 2: gonna fucking actually do what I said, which is like
Speaker 2: never happened in my lifetime. So I think that you've
Speaker 2: already seen it. I mean the Nicole Shanahan, the running
Speaker 2: mate of Bobby Kennedy, she tells this story and it's
Speaker 2: absolutely heartbreaking of her child the same basically the same
Speaker 2: story that Top was just telling. It's like her child
Speaker 2: was a perfect, beautiful, healthy baby until eighteen months and
Speaker 2: then it was over. Then it was just like they
Speaker 2: shut off and they became noncommunicative or communicative and they've
Speaker 2: never come back. And she's probably tried the metal detok
Speaker 2: stuff and all that, because she's very much up on
Speaker 2: the you know, hippie dippy science type of stuff, but
Speaker 2: obviously the impact was more lasting on her child, and
Speaker 2: as a consequence, they radicalized a billionaire to now come
Speaker 2: after pharma, and that's that's what she is. So oh god,
Speaker 2: damn it, my phone's going off with Alex Jones. I
Speaker 2: don't know what's happening. Give me ten seconds.
Speaker 12: Sure, yeah it is. It's it's the worst shit in
Speaker 12: the world because not only are you gonna shake your
Speaker 12: fist at the government and you know all these institutions
Speaker 12: that led you down this path, but then you fucking
Speaker 12: I don't want to get like too bummed out here,
Speaker 12: but it's like you walk your kid into the door
Speaker 12: and you sit him down and you tell him it's
Speaker 12: gonna be okay.
Speaker 9: You tell him to trust the doctor.
Speaker 12: The kids crying when they're getting a shot, Like I've
Speaker 12: taken my son for shots. He's got a couple of
Speaker 12: his vaccinations when he was really small. And then we
Speaker 12: just fucking stopped. It wasn't an actual discussion that my
Speaker 12: wife and have, It was my wife and I had.
Speaker 12: It was just kind of this, we both kind of
Speaker 12: felt it. We were feel anymore. Then we stopped going forward. Yeah,
Speaker 12: it doesn't feel right. It doesn't feel right, And so.
Speaker 2: You look, I think it's just it's just the same
Speaker 2: thing as putting children on psychedelic or psychotropic medications. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it just you just I think you instinctually understand you're
Speaker 2: not supposed to be doing this to a child, Like
Speaker 2: you cannot do this. You can't be putting brain altering
Speaker 2: drugs into a fucking seven year old or in your case,
Speaker 2: a thirteen year old, Like what are you doing?
Speaker 3: These are the most formative years.
Speaker 2: All of the issues that you think that your child
Speaker 2: has may be a product of development that they may
Speaker 2: as puberty comes and everything else, and they fully developed
Speaker 2: that this will all alleviate itself. The gender dysphoria is
Speaker 2: a great example of this that like eighty seven percent
Speaker 2: Josie throws the stet at all the time. Eighty seven
Speaker 2: percent of kids with gender dysphoria, as soon as they
Speaker 2: go through puberty, it's over. They don't need anything else.
Speaker 2: But what is the what is the actual cure to
Speaker 2: gender dysphoria according to our current medical establishment, puberty blockers. Yeah,
Speaker 2: think about how fucking crazy it is to the cure
Speaker 2: is the disease. I mean, it's unbelievable.
Speaker 12: I struggle to you know nowadays, especially with the whole
Speaker 12: COVID vaccine, when a lot of us should have been
Speaker 12: able to at least you didn't have to be conspiratorial
Speaker 12: to say, since when does the government roll out anything
Speaker 12: free related to healthcare just for the benefit of us?
Speaker 12: I mean, there's so many ways in which they don't
Speaker 12: do that sort of thing. There's so many ways in
Speaker 12: which the pharmaceutical industries and the insurance companies are taking
Speaker 12: advantage of the American public. And so when this thing
Speaker 12: came around, it was like, you know, you should have
Speaker 12: been like, I don't know, since when you guys fucking
Speaker 12: do anything free for the good of the people. But
Speaker 12: we just had that situation with like, was it jd
Speaker 12: Vance's niece who had to go and get was it heart?
Speaker 12: I think was heart transplant surgery, And they're denying this
Speaker 12: child heart transplant surgery because she's unvaccinated.
Speaker 11: Honestly, I'll tell you the truth. That feels to me
Speaker 11: like a psychological operation that's being performed, because you know,
Speaker 11: it's not just the deep state doing this, but the
Speaker 11: right is playing their games as well, and if I
Speaker 11: want so, for instance, the black Hawk down thing, where
Speaker 11: it's like, oh, it was a transgender pilot and then
Speaker 11: it turns.
Speaker 9: Out that it was just a dude. Who knows.
Speaker 11: It was probably some dude that was paid to to
Speaker 11: crash that plane. But yeah, it's but it works really
Speaker 11: nicely for the d DEI propaganda for you know, getting
Speaker 11: the right consolidated, and I understand it. I like that
Speaker 11: type of propaganda, but I'm also weary about where it leads.
Speaker 12: Yeah, it's a galvanizing moment where like, not only are
Speaker 12: you vindicated right because you finally saw enough, you've had enough.
Speaker 12: Now Trump is in office because you contributed to this
Speaker 12: whole thing and you voted. But now, and I'm not
Speaker 12: saying these things aren't good, but I do recognize that
Speaker 12: if you perform theater of the correct variety at this
Speaker 12: opportunistic moment, you can really galvanize people to a cause.
Speaker 9: So I'm open to that idea.
Speaker 12: But regardless of what the case actually is with Jade
Speaker 12: Vance's niece, this is something that.
Speaker 11: Now the sentiment, look look at the sentiment. So right
Speaker 11: here we've got even the vice president's family can't get
Speaker 11: surgery because of we're bringing up this old covid era
Speaker 11: stuff about like the vaccinations and not being able to
Speaker 11: what do they call that, like non essential people, this
Speaker 11: kind of stuff, and that feeling is gonna be rumbling
Speaker 11: back through. It's gonna make its way through all the
Speaker 11: right wing news sources, and then they're gonna go, well,
Speaker 11: guess what, we got a guy that's gonna investigate the
Speaker 11: covid era And it's like, yes, now I'm.
Speaker 9: Extremely for it, but it just feels time.
Speaker 3: You don't trust it'll be legit.
Speaker 9: Well, look no, but it doesn't matter.
Speaker 3: Well what doesn't matter.
Speaker 11: It doesn't matter because I think because it's where we're
Speaker 11: going anyway, Like if it's legit or not, they've already
Speaker 11: played on the sentiments of the people. Whether this plays
Speaker 11: like in a large way on the sentiments of the people.
Speaker 11: This is what's going to be in the zeitgeist, So
Speaker 11: this is what people are looking at now again and
Speaker 11: then boom, now we're going to start rolling with this.
Speaker 2: You know, I think that, I mean, some of it's contrived,
Speaker 2: and certainly the right wing manipulates its base to a
Speaker 2: certain extent too, But there is genuine outrage over what
Speaker 2: happened during the lockdowns.
Speaker 9: Like it's not people forgot, you know, people forgot though.
Speaker 2: Most most people have I'll grant you that. Yeah, but
Speaker 2: there are still there are still you know, twenty percent
Speaker 2: of people that distinctly remember not being able to see
Speaker 2: their father or their mother or their grandparent die, like
Speaker 2: they couldn't see them when they were dying, or you know,
Speaker 2: they got COVID five times despite being backs. These people
Speaker 2: are totally freaked out that like everything they thought was
Speaker 2: true isn't. I mean, there's there is a lot of
Speaker 2: discontent when it comes to that era that is very sincere.
Speaker 2: And also all of the small businesses that were lost,
Speaker 2: people that lost their jobs. These are people, yeah, I
Speaker 2: mean military veterans that like had their life, you know,
Speaker 2: thrown into turmoil as a consequence, or that now they're
Speaker 2: retired and maybe they'll be brought back, maybe they won't.
Speaker 11: That's still kind of Listen, here's it. For instance, I
Speaker 11: was I was fucking harassed at my job. I was
Speaker 11: harassed where I live. I'm I was harassed so badly
Speaker 11: that I sold my house with two kids and moved
Speaker 11: from a six figure job that was pretty much cake.
Speaker 9: And I don't really even remember it. Clint, like, it's
Speaker 9: hard for me to bring up the rage.
Speaker 3: Yeah, no, I I I can relate to that. I
Speaker 3: certainly I have.
Speaker 2: My rage has diminished greatly, Like it's it's never gonna
Speaker 2: be it's never gonna be as profound as in the moment,
Speaker 2: I mean, right, And I think that's healthy, Like you
Speaker 2: don't want to carry rage forever. However, I'm still because
Speaker 2: I'm like, I'm an autist to a certain extent, and
Speaker 2: I think very rationally. This is not about vengeance. This
Speaker 2: is about prevention. This is about preventing it from happening again.
Speaker 2: And regardless of if your rage has diminished, it's very
Speaker 2: important that the people responsible for what happened in that
Speaker 2: period are held to account. So I look, if you
Speaker 2: have to propagandize the right and say, look, even the
Speaker 2: Vice President of the United States niece can't get a
Speaker 2: heart transplant because of this bullshit. Fine, but I think
Speaker 2: I think it's a real possibility that the story's true
Speaker 2: because there were thousands of cases of that, where like
Speaker 2: you couldn't get organ transplants because you weren't vaccinated.
Speaker 3: That happened that.
Speaker 12: I think, if it's not his niece, there's still enough
Speaker 12: instances of that happening where it doesn't really matter that
Speaker 12: niece is more important than the average person.
Speaker 11: It's just timely, isn't it. It's like I'm being told
Speaker 11: this and then you know, we've got the jib. It's
Speaker 11: it's almost like we're about to go through this phase
Speaker 11: here of the Great Revelation, right, yes, the Great Awakening.
Speaker 11: We were talking about releasing the JAYFK files were annapolon
Speaker 11: a Luna already she already hinted.
Speaker 9: At there being multiple shooters. So whatever the fuck you
Speaker 9: thought before.
Speaker 11: You're you know, you're prescribed knowledge on what happened to
Speaker 11: JFK in your in your little textbook there, that's out
Speaker 11: the window. As far as I'm concerned, I think that
Speaker 11: there were way more than two shooters, but who knows
Speaker 11: how this went. But we we got confirmation that there's
Speaker 11: more than one boom. We're breaking your narrative, we're breaking
Speaker 11: your entire worldview. On top of that, we're gonna talk
Speaker 11: about MLK how he got whacked, and that'll be a
Speaker 11: big one. Then they're talking about the Epstein client list.
Speaker 11: We still have P Diddy floating around over our heads,
Speaker 11: and whether that gets released or not, it's like almost
Speaker 11: doesn't even matter because they're gonna hit us with these truths.
Speaker 11: And then they're bringing up at the same time, they're
Speaker 11: bringing up old COVID stuff. They're reigniting this like so
Speaker 11: it's like, look what look how they lied to you
Speaker 11: here and then years later here, and then years later
Speaker 11: and then oh remember the ship that you just lived through. Yeah,
Speaker 11: the COVID era. Well, we're gonna we're gonna play on
Speaker 11: those heartstrings. And when people are at like people are
Speaker 11: at a rage. I hope it doesn't happen this way,
Speaker 11: but when people see this shit, they're not going to
Speaker 11: process information. They're going to be angry, and they'll be
Speaker 11: at a rage, just vibrating. Where you can go, What
Speaker 11: do you want to do? To them, these are the guys,
Speaker 11: what do we do and do they deserve? Do they
Speaker 11: deserve it? Like we've been talking about this is fauci
Speaker 11: deserve whatever we're saying. I'd say, certainly, But when you
Speaker 11: have this huge consensus of people that are doing I'm
Speaker 11: just a little concerned about it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, just oh, go ahead.
Speaker 12: I was just gonna say, I do agree with that,
Speaker 12: and I think that you so, Clint. I've said it
Speaker 12: to you before on another show that we did that
Speaker 12: this Trump vindication train was going to keep going. It
Speaker 12: was going to involve all this QAnon stuff and everything.
Speaker 12: I do think a lot of that is coming. And
Speaker 12: I do think that it's theater not to say that
Speaker 12: those events didn't take place, but they were quashed for
Speaker 12: a time to be revealed at an opportunistic time. But
Speaker 12: I agree with this idea that, like I used to say,
Speaker 12: people's passions are not really their own right, especially when
Speaker 12: it came to like the left and Partain over these
Speaker 12: past this past decade, let's say.
Speaker 9: And that's because it's.
Speaker 12: Very clear that the propaganda machine engineer is a narrative
Speaker 12: and then it hands it to the people, and then
Speaker 12: the people care about that narrative, and it almost seems
Speaker 12: like people are unmoved by things one way or the
Speaker 12: other unless you propagandize them. So the idea that you
Speaker 12: would then need propaganda flowing in the other direction. And
Speaker 12: that doesn't mean that it has to be nefarious, but
Speaker 12: as a social experiment, it's almost clear looking at the
Speaker 12: data that like, oh shit, people really don't give a
Speaker 12: fuck about anything unless you tell them to give a
Speaker 12: fuck about it. So if you do engineer this theater
Speaker 12: in such a way you quash the conversation around it,
Speaker 12: and you suppress it until an opportunistic time, and then
Speaker 12: the theater continues and you give them a thing to
Speaker 12: be passionate about. I could see that as being what's
Speaker 12: playing out here.
Speaker 2: Well, let me I've got two thoughts on this. So
Speaker 2: first off, yes, you guys are both right to a
Speaker 2: certain extent, and like a good example of this is,
Speaker 2: you know, I've been talking on leib Lockdown about how
Speaker 2: the funding for so much of the woke insanity came
Speaker 2: from our federal government and it wasn't just domestic you know.
Speaker 2: I didn't beat the USAID drum all that often. I
Speaker 2: would oftentimes talk about different agencies that were responsible for it,
Speaker 2: but USAID usually I was talking about State Department. USAID
Speaker 2: is the funding arm for the State Department. So basically
Speaker 2: I was talking about.
Speaker 11: How long have I been calling Disney like state propaganda? Yeah,
Speaker 11: well because it acts like it, right, But now we
Speaker 11: have proof.
Speaker 2: Yeah, But I mean we've known this for a very
Speaker 2: long time. Like the contracts, much of this was public
Speaker 2: knowledge that, like USAID was funding billions of dollars to
Speaker 2: a bunch of wild shit. But it wasn't just in America.
Speaker 2: In fact, the way it got started was these were
Speaker 2: psychological operations being perpetrated against our enemy nations, and now
Speaker 2: it's being perpetrated against us. But my point is this,
Speaker 2: so despite the fact that I've been talking about this
Speaker 2: for years, and a lot of people have been talking
Speaker 2: about it for decades longer than me, it wasn't until
Speaker 2: Elon Musk tweets it out that it's like, oh shit,
Speaker 2: now now it has this like veneer of legitimacy when
Speaker 2: we all start talking about it. But here's the issue.
Speaker 2: You guys are taking this as like, well, now we're
Speaker 2: being manipulated via things we want to hear, right, But
Speaker 2: it's it's indistinguishable like, if you're going to argue this
Speaker 2: as a sy op, it's indistinguishable from just a healthy
Speaker 2: revelation of truth too, So like, I don't know how you.
Speaker 2: I don't know how you make that differentiation. And then additionally,
Speaker 2: I think that you know how people react to this
Speaker 2: stuff is like how they react A lot of this
Speaker 2: is fucking horrifying, and you ought to be very upset.
Speaker 2: I will agree with you now now that I've done
Speaker 2: Devil's Advocate of why I think you may be wrong,
Speaker 2: I'll go down the path of like, like I think
Speaker 2: you might be right?
Speaker 3: Is that this is.
Speaker 2: It actually in Intel Agency CIA playbook that you can
Speaker 2: inflame a group of people and then once you're once
Speaker 2: they're all fucking you know, on on edge, you can
Speaker 2: have a trigger to set them off to go do
Speaker 2: what you want. This is actually how I mean, I
Speaker 2: know this because of Mike Ben's research.
Speaker 3: On the UH.
Speaker 2: The Floyd Riots is like this this actually began I
Speaker 2: think it was I think I think it was Nicaraguay.
Speaker 2: They did this in eight nineteen eighty two eighty three
Speaker 2: in Nicaragua, and then all of these tools have been
Speaker 2: in their toolbook, you know, in their in their playlist,
Speaker 2: and they've used it against us forever. But I'm I
Speaker 2: really do believe that the entire George Floyd summer was
Speaker 2: like a massive psychological operation to get young people in
Speaker 2: the street basically just weaponized retards. They not nothing, I
Speaker 2: mean dangerous retards.
Speaker 3: There you go.
Speaker 12: I agree with that so much that I would even
Speaker 12: go far back as to speculate that much of the
Speaker 12: entertainment that we absorbed in the early two thousands was
Speaker 12: about rioting and taking to the streets and overthrowing governments.
Speaker 9: I mean it was in music videos constantly.
Speaker 12: You can go back, like a great example was Rihanna
Speaker 12: and Kanye West and jay Z's Run This Town. If
Speaker 12: you go back that entire thing, it's funny. I just
Speaker 12: mentioned some of the biggest players in the music industry,
Speaker 12: by the way, and one of the most famous videos
Speaker 12: that they had it was all a giant riot.
Speaker 9: It looked like Black Lives Matter before it happened.
Speaker 12: I think the question that we need to be asking
Speaker 12: ourselves is historically speaking, when we look at revolutions, which
Speaker 12: body outweighs the other. The amount of organic grassroot revolutions
Speaker 12: that were not co opted by an intelligence agency or
Speaker 12: the ones that did have promising starts but were co
Speaker 12: opted and then steered to the benefit of some shadowy,
Speaker 12: you know, government entity somewhere, whether it's an American one.
Speaker 3: Or otherwise, all of them, it's almost so.
Speaker 12: I then begin to ask myself if that's the case,
Speaker 12: if it's almost all of them, is it human nature
Speaker 12: to mobilize on that scale? Or have we been historically
Speaker 12: pitted against each other one way or another to further
Speaker 12: the interests of some group. And I think that it
Speaker 12: looks like we're getting ready to have that shit happen again.
Speaker 9: And I think that this one might be the biggest.
Speaker 12: I think we might have the pleasure of bearing witness
Speaker 12: to one of the biggest. I mean, you know, you
Speaker 12: said that they use these tactics on us again historically,
Speaker 12: and we've been talking about that a lot on Nephlum
Speaker 12: Deth Squad. It's like these systems that are levied against us,
Speaker 12: they look like things that have happened ad nauseum throughout history.
Speaker 12: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. These things work
Speaker 12: really well and they will use them honest, And our
Speaker 12: attention span is so short that we can't seem to
Speaker 12: look back in the past and see it for what
Speaker 12: it is.
Speaker 3: You're right, But.
Speaker 2: So I think that let me give a little bit
Speaker 2: more background on this. So the CIA playbook on starting
Speaker 2: like street revolutions was that if you can get two hundred,
Speaker 2: you know, agitators on your side, you can get twenty
Speaker 2: thousand people to write like, that's all you need. So
Speaker 2: when you this ties in perfectly to Jay six, I
Speaker 2: might add that you don't need you don't need everybody
Speaker 2: there to be ready to be violent. You need fifty
Speaker 2: people to be in your employ to just go like
Speaker 2: to murmur to people, hey, when I charge, you charge
Speaker 2: with me, a right, And then you see that that
Speaker 2: police barricade, we're gonna fucking walk past that. We don't
Speaker 2: have to be violent. Let's just see what the cops do.
Speaker 2: And then you have another guy that goes like, I'm
Speaker 2: gonna throw a brick through this class and then it's
Speaker 2: just like it fucking sets it off and the cops respond. Also,
Speaker 2: you only have to have a couple of cops that
Speaker 2: are in your employee that say, hey, fire a fucking
Speaker 2: pepper ball at people before they even start rioting. Okay,
Speaker 2: Like that's all you have to do. And then tensions heightened,
Speaker 2: tensions heightened. Then you have another guy in the in
Speaker 2: the you know, protester crowd that goes. Now, now we
Speaker 2: charge the barricades, and then you then you have another
Speaker 2: cop fire another fucking pepper.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 2: It's just like it's so easy, like this is this
Speaker 2: is mob mentality, this is so it's so easy to
Speaker 2: get control of people's emotions and to manipulate Here's the
Speaker 2: thing though, Yeah, well here's the thing though. There are
Speaker 2: times in human history, particularly before there was these immense
Speaker 2: governments and before there was social media or technology to
Speaker 2: do these things, that there were revolutions, Like so people
Speaker 2: have the capacity to get upset and to revolt organically.
Speaker 2: I think that the issue is that while they simultaneously
Speaker 2: inflame you and manipulate you to get you to revolt
Speaker 2: in a fashion that they want you to, they also
Speaker 2: make it extraordinarily cost prohibitive for you to organically organize.
Speaker 2: So if you recall, it was like lockdown era, and
Speaker 2: they're like you can't go outside, you can't work, you
Speaker 2: can't see your fucking relatives, you can't nothing. But then
Speaker 2: they put out these articles going, but if you don't
Speaker 2: get in the streets to protest the George Floyd murder. Right,
Speaker 2: So so what are they telling you. They're telling you, Hey,
Speaker 2: you have all of this tension built up, and you
Speaker 2: probably would revolt naturally if you weren't so scared of
Speaker 2: the fucking federal government. But we're gonna give you an
Speaker 2: avenue to express that feeling, and that expression is going
Speaker 2: to be about police brutality specifically, it's gonna have nothing
Speaker 2: to do with the fact that you've been locked in
Speaker 2: your house and your entire life has been thrown into turmoil.
Speaker 2: So a lot of people that aren't really concerned about
Speaker 2: George Floyd all that much, go, yeah, I'm getting in
Speaker 2: the fucking streets, dude. So like you see how it
Speaker 2: all happens like it's fucked.
Speaker 9: Ye.
Speaker 11: Here's a question, though, how how many times can you
Speaker 11: play that card? They've played it once for the left,
Speaker 11: the George Floyd riots and the Summer of Love, and
Speaker 11: it doesn't seem like they've been successful in getting people
Speaker 11: out there to protest at least this last election, Like
Speaker 11: you know, Trump won and they were kind of like
Speaker 11: a couple of people in New York but they were
Speaker 11: just like, we don't have it. So that's done, that
Speaker 11: card is played. But what I'm what I'm worried about
Speaker 11: is that we have not had a legitimate movement in
Speaker 11: this country. Probably sits since its inception, maybe even its
Speaker 11: inception wasn't even a legitimate movement. It could have been
Speaker 11: a movement just by the by the crown.
Speaker 2: And you're gonna hate that, You're gonna hate this, but
Speaker 2: I i'd actually, I would like your opinion. I think
Speaker 2: that the Ron Paul Revolution was a real movement because
Speaker 2: if you look at the media's treatment of it, he
Speaker 2: was suppressed every step of the way. They're like Michelle Bachman,
Speaker 2: that drops down to third and it's like, who the
Speaker 2: fuck is in second? You know, It's like it was
Speaker 2: Ron Paul was in second. I think that was a
Speaker 2: real movement.
Speaker 3: I do.
Speaker 9: I agree.
Speaker 11: So I'm I'm miss I'm not, I'm not. I guess
Speaker 11: I'm miss speaking when I say this, But like, obviously,
Speaker 11: things like the Ron Pole Revolution, and yes, because you
Speaker 11: know why that would that wasn't really requiring this extreme
Speaker 11: reaction in one direction or the other, which you know,
Speaker 11: either either of these directions are not correct, They're they're
Speaker 11: both the same. They're there are two wings of the
Speaker 11: same bird, as people like to say. And it does
Speaker 11: sound kind of stupid of me to say it in
Speaker 11: this in this manner because I like to play the
Speaker 11: politics like the right the left, there are extreme differences.
Speaker 11: But my brain starts to think, well, what if we
Speaker 11: were always supposed to be led down this path to
Speaker 11: do a certain thing? Like we're like, what if the
Speaker 11: objective since nineteen thirteen was to get us to do
Speaker 11: x YZ action? And like, well, how could I get
Speaker 11: the people of America to react in this way? And
Speaker 11: I'm not quite sure what the way is yet, but
Speaker 11: it's it's about to be presented to us, and it
Speaker 11: might be. That's why I'm very suspicious. So none of
Speaker 11: the last four years, the last eight years made any
Speaker 11: fucking sense, which is why we're here and people listen
Speaker 11: to us because we have a way of speaking. But
Speaker 11: what we're saying is very obvious, Like we shouldn't be
Speaker 11: killing babies. A man is a man, stop giving kids,
Speaker 11: you know whatever, transgender fluid, transgenderent water. These are like
Speaker 11: very easy things to say, and obviously it doesn't seem easy.
Speaker 11: People are cowardly. There's a whole machine, it's a billion
Speaker 11: dollar propaganda machine against you. But the fact is that, yes,
Speaker 11: this is a very simple thing, and we've been radicalized
Speaker 11: against it. And now they go like they just basically
Speaker 11: let the pin loose, and now we're all snapping back
Speaker 11: in the other direction and hard with everything. This is
Speaker 11: what I'm saying when I'm looking around, you have a
Speaker 11: cash bettell of the guy that's gonna he's he wants
Speaker 11: to completely gut the FBI.
Speaker 9: We just got a freaking what's her name in some milf.
Speaker 3: Uh BONDI no, uh yeah, yeah.
Speaker 9: Yeah, Tulsi.
Speaker 11: She's in the dn I MILF approved this DNI. This
Speaker 11: is like everything is everything is moving full blast in
Speaker 11: one direction, and it almost feels like I was supposed
Speaker 11: to move that way the whole time. I feel like
Speaker 11: I'm being played, Like like with the Jewish movement, same
Speaker 11: sort of thing. I feel like I'm being played like
Speaker 11: we were supposed to notice, and then once everyone noticed,
Speaker 11: they allowed critical mass and then I'm sat here. I'm
Speaker 11: sitting here wondering why why am I allowed to now?
Speaker 11: And where are we going? Was this intentional? The entire time?
Speaker 12: I felt the same way when they didn't, he say
Speaker 12: in an executive order where he said there are now
Speaker 12: only two genders, and it's like there's always only have
Speaker 12: been two genders. These these problems, a lot of them
Speaker 12: are hugely detrimental, but but stupid that they became problems
Speaker 12: in the first place and are honestly easily fixed. And
Speaker 12: so in that way, it feels like, yeah, we created
Speaker 12: a bunch of like really horrifying bogeyman but their paper thin,
Speaker 12: and you could take them down pretty easily if you're
Speaker 12: the Trump administration. And this just goes back to what
Speaker 12: I was saying that I had spoken to to Clint about,
Speaker 12: is the idea that right now we're experiencing that big snapback,
Speaker 12: but man, you drop a couple more pieces on the table, like,
Speaker 12: oh shit, the depths, the deep State, you know, and Epstein,
Speaker 12: they were they were working really close together, and we're
Speaker 12: going to expose the names of those people that were
Speaker 12: involved in that, and and some of them are still
Speaker 12: operating with like Diddy and things like that.
Speaker 9: You know, the Trump administration seems too.
Speaker 12: I think we talked to this last episode where the
Speaker 12: first run through there was a lot of pedophile ring
Speaker 12: bus but they just were underreported by the media, and
Speaker 12: they certainly weren't drawing a correlation between one pedal ring
Speaker 12: bust and another pedo ring bus. They were just casually
Speaker 12: reporting on them when you definitely could have said, look
Speaker 12: at what the Trump administration is doing. All of these
Speaker 12: children are being saved, YadA YadA. If all that happens again,
Speaker 12: which they've kind of started up that rhetoric again, right,
Speaker 12: the Trump administration found seventy five thousand missing children that
Speaker 12: the Biden administration couldn't find. If that continues, then that
Speaker 12: galvanizing to that cause and that snapback that you're talking
Speaker 12: about top where the rubber band has been released and
Speaker 12: the pendulum is swinging now, it's gonna be immeasurable how aggressive,
Speaker 12: and that could be something.
Speaker 9: It's old bottlenecked.
Speaker 11: It's all bottlenecked into Trump, which is interesting, Like we
Speaker 11: have Tulsi people, You've got RFK people, You've gonna you're
Speaker 11: gonna have you know people who it matters deeply, uh,
Speaker 11: you know, child trafficking or from all walks of life
Speaker 11: will be propelled towards the right wing, bottlenecked into whatever
Speaker 11: Trump is doing. And this is what I'm really suspicious of.
Speaker 11: And it's gonna make me sound like a it makes
Speaker 11: me sound like a someone with Trump arrangement syndrome.
Speaker 12: All right, I thought you were gonna say it makes
Speaker 12: me sound like a que a non person, because if
Speaker 12: that psychological operation comes back in any meaningful way at
Speaker 12: this point in the theater, I just recognize it as
Speaker 12: a monumental emotional leverage here.
Speaker 3: Just to kind of play Devil's Advocate with you, guys,
Speaker 3: share share my screen right now. So I posted this
Speaker 3: a couple of days ago.
Speaker 2: And the reason I do stuff like this this is
Speaker 2: kind of a disclosure for the audience's sake that they
Speaker 2: may be surprised by. But I actually talk like this
Speaker 2: very intentionally because I understand kind of group mentality.
Speaker 9: Like, so clearly there's fifty six thousand likes on this.
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, so I uh here, I'll just read it.
Speaker 2: So I said, there's a misconception about Trump voters that
Speaker 2: should be put to rest. So like, this is coming
Speaker 2: from a guy who didn't even vote for Trump and
Speaker 2: at all, and and honestly like went really hard against
Speaker 2: him for years and years and years, who just changed
Speaker 2: his mind four months ago. For me to talk like
Speaker 2: this is absurd, but I did it with great intention.
Speaker 2: So I said, there's a misconception about Trump voters that
Speaker 2: should be put to rest. We aren't just interested in
Speaker 2: seeing corrupt Democrats for set of power. We would actually
Speaker 2: like to see them prosecute it, along with every Republican
Speaker 2: swamp monster that sold this country out, all of them.
Speaker 2: So specifically, the reason I did that is because what
Speaker 2: you guys are talking about about how you can be
Speaker 2: manipulated and how that how we may very well be
Speaker 2: getting manipulated, is that I want it. I want to
Speaker 2: have the zeitgeist already framed. And I know it's absurd
Speaker 2: to think that I could do this individually, but like,
Speaker 2: I know that before they get a narrative set given
Speaker 2: to them. I know Trump supporters actually agree with me
Speaker 2: on this that they want to see Republicans lock the
Speaker 2: fuck up like the corrupt swamp monsters, the guys that
Speaker 2: have done all the evil shit that the Democrats have done,
Speaker 2: they want them locked up.
Speaker 3: Now if Trump comes out and he says.
Speaker 2: You know, everybody on our side is good and all
Speaker 2: the Democrats need to go to prison, like so I'm
Speaker 2: trying to I'm trying to actually front run potential siops,
Speaker 2: you see what I'm saying. So I understand what you
Speaker 2: guys are talking about. The right wing is certainly prone
Speaker 2: and capable of being manipulated. I think it's it's harder
Speaker 2: to do so, but in one avenue it's easier to
Speaker 2: do so. And this is nationalistic pride. And the greatest
Speaker 2: example of the right wing being syoped is obviously nine
Speaker 2: to twelve of one, like, yeah, you you as soon
Speaker 2: as you have them in flat we've been we've been
Speaker 2: hit by who, motherfucker, and they're just like it was
Speaker 2: Saddam Hussein and everyone was like kill him, you know,
Speaker 2: and it was a lie.
Speaker 3: It was all a lie. But that's all they had
Speaker 3: to do.
Speaker 2: Because once you have them triggered on some nationalistic also
Speaker 2: some bravado, you know, let's go make war, like the
Speaker 2: right loves that shit, So that is I think that's
Speaker 2: the greatest threat is that one. Either this just becomes
Speaker 2: a partisan disclosure thing, where like we just highlight all
Speaker 2: of the depravity of Democrats and maybe you see a
Speaker 2: handful of prosecutions, but the right wing just sails on
Speaker 2: through Mitch mcconollin, Lindsey Graham, who's been you know, probably
Speaker 2: fucking kids and truck stops for decades, Like I want
Speaker 2: to see all of these people on both sides of
Speaker 2: the al actually put away. So I think that's because
Speaker 2: I understand what you guys are talking about. That's the
Speaker 2: way I behave. How I do is that like I'm
Speaker 2: trying to actually set narrative frames and fight the controlled
Speaker 2: narrative frame. I know that seems weird to like use
Speaker 2: propaganda to prevent propaganda, but that's what I'm doing.
Speaker 12: No, that's like the name of the game. I think
Speaker 12: that's that's kind of what we do, well, what we
Speaker 12: should be doing. Because I want to to ask something.
Speaker 9: It's it's exactly what we should be doing. I think
Speaker 9: it's the right answer.
Speaker 2: But what I think is just to be clear, I'm
Speaker 2: not lying. I mean, like what I'm saying is true,
Speaker 2: but I'm just explaining the reason why I said it
Speaker 2: when I said it.
Speaker 11: Well, I think that I think that what you're proposing
Speaker 11: will happen, and I it maybe it won't be sweeping
Speaker 11: like all the way through, but I think we'll get
Speaker 11: some big names from both sides and people will be
Speaker 11: happy enough to let it go, like you know, just
Speaker 11: have those those bodies, those heads on a stick and
Speaker 11: let the rest go, which is which is fine, it's
Speaker 11: neither here nor there. But what's really happening underneath it
Speaker 11: is when once this is exposed from both sides, there
Speaker 11: will be this third thing, which is MAGA, and people
Speaker 11: will be we're already bottlenecked into MAGA. And what is
Speaker 11: going to happen is Donald Trump or whoever the the
Speaker 11: think think tank is behind whatever MAGA is, is going
Speaker 11: to create a culture that is the United States. This
Speaker 11: is a conversation I had with my my cousin where
Speaker 11: he was, you know, he's he's kind of a lefty
Speaker 11: a little bit, but he doesn't understand that he doesn't
Speaker 11: understand the dynamics of how politics can affect our lives.
Speaker 11: And one of the things I was saying is that, hey, listen,
Speaker 11: as Americans, we don't have a culture. I can't point
Speaker 11: to one thing that all people that are here have
Speaker 11: in common, and that's you know, excluding illegal immigrants as well.
Speaker 11: There is no driving force underneath all of us. And
Speaker 11: if you want to have a nation, you have to
Speaker 11: have that. Well, Donald Trump is going to create that
Speaker 11: driving force, whatever that is, that culture, and I think
Speaker 11: that it'll be close to one hundred percent of people
Speaker 11: that will be on this culture. I just don't know
Speaker 11: what it is yet, and I'm extremely skeptical of what
Speaker 11: they will what he's going to present. But for sure,
Speaker 11: what you're saying, both sides are going to go down.
Speaker 11: This is going to be disgusting. It's going to get ugly.
Speaker 11: People are going to hate it. Then they'll have to
Speaker 11: accept it, and then they'll move in a certain direction.
Speaker 11: And I'm looking at which direction that is, because I
Speaker 11: feel like that direction is intentional and it's been planned
Speaker 11: for a long time.
Speaker 12: You're you're looking for this conjoining tissue, this pivotal moment
Speaker 12: through a cultural legs. Like it's like, how do you
Speaker 12: engineer this culture that we all have in common with
Speaker 12: one another? But what what Clint said, I think actually
Speaker 12: works better at galvanizing people than culture does.
Speaker 9: And that is nine to eleven.
Speaker 12: And what I mean by that is I look at
Speaker 12: these things as theater and so to me, well, I
Speaker 12: mean in a way, yeah, so I look at like
Speaker 12: what Elon Musk says, right, and I'm paraphrasing, I always
Speaker 12: screw it up. But it's like, the most entertaining outcome
Speaker 12: is the likeliest outcome that's genuinely how I tend to
Speaker 12: look at the highest levels of the movers and shakers
Speaker 12: in the political sphere of the world stage. And so
Speaker 12: it is not lost on me that if in this
Speaker 12: moment you had a nine to eleven scale attack, let's
Speaker 12: say it was on Trump, which for a second I
Speaker 12: was actually wondering if they were going to try to
Speaker 12: do something at the super Bowl, because I swore in
Speaker 12: my schizophrenic.
Speaker 11: You're not ready yet. You're not ready there yet, like
Speaker 11: the pod is. The pod is at a simmer, it's not.
Speaker 12: Born, not there yet. But but this brings me to
Speaker 12: a question for both you and Clint, and that is
Speaker 12: what do you make because we're talking about nine to
Speaker 12: eleven and Israel seems to have been involved. Uh, And
Speaker 12: Trump was the recipient of a of a wonderful gift
Speaker 12: lately or recently from Netan Yahoo in the form of
Speaker 12: a golden beeper, which you know, the Internet or at
Speaker 12: least X largely took that as a threat, a veiled threat,
Speaker 12: not even a veiled threat, just an outright threat. And
Speaker 12: to me, the narrative, narrative is shifted in such a
Speaker 12: way where I previously used to look at Donald Trump
Speaker 12: in all his ties to Israel and how much various
Speaker 12: groups of like rabbinic Jews in Israel were like idolizing Trump.
Speaker 9: They thought he was the Mosak.
Speaker 12: They're putting his face on a coin, a commemorative coin,
Speaker 12: next to King Cyrus, which is not a messianic figure,
Speaker 12: but it's somebody that is really important to them. You know,
Speaker 12: the Israeli Boys choir is singing Trump, there's that coin.
Speaker 12: You know, they're gifting him a rabbinic a group of
Speaker 12: rabbinic Jews is gifting him this silver crown. And then
Speaker 12: all of a sudden, there's this moment on stage where
Speaker 12: we're not on stage, but it's it's a televised live stream,
Speaker 12: and it looks a little bit weird because Donald Trump
Speaker 12: is like pushing in the chair of Benjamin Nett and Yahoo,
Speaker 12: and everybody's starting to wildly speculate, is this simp behavior,
Speaker 12: is this submissive behavior?
Speaker 9: Is Net and Yahoo really the one who's in command?
Speaker 12: And then suddenly he sits down next to him and
Speaker 12: he just tells the world that America is gonna be
Speaker 12: taking over Gaza.
Speaker 9: And if you look to Benjamin Nett and Yaho and.
Speaker 12: I thought you did a great job of laying this
Speaker 12: out Clinton on Twitter on x He does not look
Speaker 12: like he was prepared for Donald Trump to say that.
Speaker 9: He looks taken aback in very many ways.
Speaker 12: And so let's just say for argument's sake, that wasn't
Speaker 12: part of the discussion, and he's not too pleased about that.
Speaker 12: And when you couple that with gifting the man a
Speaker 12: golden beeper, which is, you know, callback to the exploding beepers,
Speaker 12: I just can't help but wonder if maybe we are
Speaker 12: getting primed for like this big attack that would Galvin
Speaker 12: And this is highly speculative, right, we can't really do
Speaker 12: anything with this, but if that happened in the middle
Speaker 12: of this, while Donald Trump is cleaning up house, and
Speaker 12: some attack is launched on him or launched on the nation,
Speaker 12: I would imagine that they would want to get him
Speaker 12: out of the way. If this is not theater, that
Speaker 12: would really set the people on fire, especially those who
Speaker 12: finally came out and voted for Trump. Despite being you know,
Speaker 12: dismissed and insulted and called a racist and a bigot
Speaker 12: and all these things for all these years for supporting Trump,
Speaker 12: they finally threw those off and walked to the voting
Speaker 12: booths and did it anyway for them to then guy
Speaker 12: getting taken out I recognize would be huge.
Speaker 2: So I think he's saying that the you think that
Speaker 2: the Israelis may take out Trump.
Speaker 12: It's not that I think the Israelis may take out Trump.
Speaker 12: It's just not lost on me that if you're looking
Speaker 12: through this lens of the most entertaining outcome is the
Speaker 12: likeliest outcome, Well, then we're due for a big attack.
Speaker 12: And net and Yahoo almost seems to have issued a
Speaker 12: veiled threat there.
Speaker 2: Okay, Well, here's here's the thing. So I'm I'm obviously
Speaker 2: very you know, aware of Trump's ties to Israel, and
Speaker 2: obviously Miriam Ailson is largely responsible for Trump winning. I mean,
Speaker 2: she gave him one hundred million dollars for his reelection,
Speaker 2: so and her her top priority is the security of Israel.
Speaker 2: So I'm not I'm not, you know, naive to any
Speaker 2: of those facts. I think that the Israel is responsible
Speaker 2: for everything. People overlook the fact that there is immense
Speaker 2: tension between Trump and that Yahoo. Trump has talked about this,
Speaker 2: and there's been reporting about it. I don't know that
Speaker 2: he's talked about it openly, but he's basically said like,
Speaker 2: I fucking hate this guy.
Speaker 11: He was very angry with him after the twenty twenty
Speaker 11: election because all but yeah, yeah, he was like, I
Speaker 11: see which way this is going, and he just started
Speaker 11: calling Biden and he's like, fuck Trump, even though Trump
Speaker 11: bent over backwards for him for four years.
Speaker 9: So I'm sure it didn't play nice.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: So I think that people people overstate Israel's control, but
Speaker 2: then like a huge amount of people understate it too,
Speaker 2: Like of course, but I think that there's a lot
Speaker 2: of tension between Trump and net Yahoo.
Speaker 3: There's immense egos that are clashing with one another.
Speaker 2: I don't I don't necessarily take the Golden Beeper as
Speaker 2: a threat, especially with Trump. You know, he held it
Speaker 2: up and he was like, hey, you know, I think
Speaker 2: that Trump is like such a narcissist that he's.
Speaker 3: Like I like, I dare you, Like I dare you
Speaker 3: to do it? That's what.
Speaker 9: Yeah, So that taking over guys, that felt.
Speaker 2: Like yeah, exactly, And I think that that's the reason
Speaker 2: I posted that clip, even though a lot of people
Speaker 2: took it as like, oh, you're just you know, carrying
Speaker 2: water for Trump. It's like, that's my honest opinion. I
Speaker 2: Netanyahu's face when Trump says that is not one of knowing,
Speaker 2: like he was not read in on that. It doesn't
Speaker 2: seem like Trump had even talked about that privately with him.
Speaker 2: He was like, what the fuck is this dude saying
Speaker 2: right now? So I think there's a lot of tension there.
Speaker 2: I think that there's a real all right, this is
Speaker 2: another like little secret in understanding US Israeli relations, in
Speaker 2: my opinion, Just last night there was reports that Israel
Speaker 2: was preparing multiple strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Anytime you
Speaker 2: hear about Israel threatening to bomb Iran, it is usually
Speaker 2: because America is not doing what they want. Like, I
Speaker 2: know that sounds kind of ridiculous, So maybe not to
Speaker 2: you guys, but for our audience they may go, like,
Speaker 2: what the fuck are you talking about. They have been
Speaker 2: trying to get America to take out it Iran for
Speaker 2: fucking forty years, So anytime that there's tension and like,
Speaker 2: it's obvious that America does not want that war, Like
Speaker 2: they don't want to fucking invader Iran. There's been ample
Speaker 2: opportunity to do so, and it's just never happened. Even so,
Speaker 2: this is a really interesting story in two to three,
Speaker 2: it was sharone. It was like it went Nan Yahoo Sharon,
Speaker 2: and then back to Nan Yahu. So after nine to
Speaker 2: eleven and they're like, they're trying to figure out because
Speaker 2: it is true that the neo Khon movement in America
Speaker 2: is largely like Israel first, many of them are Israelis
Speaker 2: or Jewish. They they wanted to get America as a
Speaker 2: response to nine to eleven to take out Iran. That
Speaker 2: is actually what they wanted. The basically the compromise position
Speaker 2: from the US military industrial complex or the US politicians
Speaker 2: was like, hey, yes, we're going to take out Iran,
Speaker 2: but we're going to take out Saddam Hussein first. So
Speaker 2: this is the key thing to understand. This is why
Speaker 2: I don't like it when people just go it's the Jones,
Speaker 2: that's all there is. It's like there was ego decisions
Speaker 2: being made in that because George Bush was nearly assassinated
Speaker 2: by Saddam Hussein at least that's the story, and his
Speaker 2: son very much wanted vengeance against sdam Hussein. So there's
Speaker 2: still ego shit that happens. There's still autonomy that the
Speaker 2: United States president has. They were like, take out fucking
Speaker 2: Iran and Bush and company were like, we're gonna.
Speaker 3: Take out Iraq.
Speaker 2: Actually, you know, it's like, which is insane because that's
Speaker 2: an enemy of Iran. So anyways, long story short, I
Speaker 2: just think that there's a lot, there's a lot more
Speaker 2: at play, and I just wish people would have a
Speaker 2: little bit more of an open mind.
Speaker 3: It's not just Israel people. There is a nuance going on.
Speaker 11: The nuance is needed and it's well I agree completely
Speaker 11: with which is why I'm like, I backed off the
Speaker 11: whole Jewish thing because it's like, it's not all of them.
Speaker 11: It is a lot of them, it is, and what
Speaker 11: they do like, it's it's not that it's I'll almost
Speaker 11: say that Israel doesn't control the United States. Israel is
Speaker 11: like this wild dog that the United States has, and
Speaker 11: it's in the Middle East in flame tensions with all
Speaker 11: of our enemies right now. But that wild dog has
Speaker 11: extreme blackmail and not just blackmail, but like the thing
Speaker 11: I don't like. Why I really dislike the I'll just
Speaker 11: say the Jews, and by that I mean those people
Speaker 11: that are doing this thing, is because it wasn't good
Speaker 11: enough to blackmail our politicians like they went in and
Speaker 11: most of the did you know that most of the
Speaker 11: Christian seminaries are Zionist funded, like the Schofield Bible. The
Speaker 11: Schofield Bible is an interpretation of the Bible which every everybody,
Speaker 11: at least for the Assemblies of God. This is a
Speaker 11: sect of Pentecostal Christianity, which makes up a huge proportion
Speaker 11: of it. Every single pastor is studying the Bible in
Speaker 11: their seminary with the Schofield the Schofield Bible right next
Speaker 11: to it, or it's part of it. So you'll read
Speaker 11: the scripture and then it'll tell you what it's supposed
Speaker 11: to mean. And every single time it's like, we have
Speaker 11: to support Israel. So what I'm saying is that, k.
Speaker 2: Can I interject real quick? Because I've heard I think
Speaker 2: it was on tenfoil Hat. I've heard that the Scofield
Speaker 2: Bible was actually by the Rothschilds.
Speaker 3: Is that true? Yes?
Speaker 11: Well in a sense, yeah, but it's it's funded by
Speaker 11: Zionists all over and and either way it doesn't matter.
Speaker 9: They just read it.
Speaker 11: If you read it, you'll understand the Christian sentiment now
Speaker 11: to always back Israel. Where nowhere in the Bible it
Speaker 11: says that So this is the frustrating part for me.
Speaker 11: It's like, do they control our nation in a sense,
Speaker 11: they control our politicians in some sense, they have extreme
Speaker 11: influence more than they should. And even our culture like
Speaker 11: again like music and all this stuff, but really the
Speaker 11: Christian culture, the idea of what Christianity is, they have
Speaker 11: taken that. And again it's like they It's like, who
Speaker 11: do you mean, Dave Smith? Like, no, I'm talking about
Speaker 11: extremely rich Zionists who want to put Israel's needs first,
Speaker 11: and it's overshadowed an entire religion which a country was
Speaker 11: based off of.
Speaker 2: This is a religion, Yeah, in a religion that you
Speaker 2: deeply believe in. I totally understand why it would be
Speaker 2: offensive if it if it can be proven that that's true,
Speaker 2: and I tend to believe that it is true. As
Speaker 2: a Schofield Bible was in fact funded by Zionists to
Speaker 2: manipulate the evangelical crowd in America to their ends. That's
Speaker 2: fucking evil, unspeakable evil. I mean, that's that's that's about.
Speaker 2: That's about as bad a thing as you can do,
Speaker 2: to fucking manipulate someone's religious beliefs, to to try and
Speaker 2: you know, become your your perennial defender, your perennial pit bull.
Speaker 2: Like that's fucking insane. It's genius because you're just technically genius.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you're You're.
Speaker 9: The pit bull.
Speaker 11: And this pitple has become so smart that it's made
Speaker 11: the human it's attack dog in a sense. Very bizarre
Speaker 11: relationship we have with these with this with this country.
Speaker 11: And it's like, again, yeah, did they control everything? No,
Speaker 11: you have a lot of personal agency, but certainly they
Speaker 11: do have a lot of influence over what we do.
Speaker 9: And what was the premise of this? Are they going
Speaker 9: to attack Trump?
Speaker 12: I don't think so, because this is what my my
Speaker 12: schizophrenic light of thought was, or what I suspected would happen,
Speaker 12: or at least what I suspect would happen if this
Speaker 12: was entertaining, Uh was going to take place? Was this
Speaker 12: idea that maybe they were going to attack Trump in
Speaker 12: some way, shape or form.
Speaker 9: Uh, it was really going to be Israel.
Speaker 12: But after the job was done, they blame it, and
Speaker 12: I I ran justifying, you know, we would all galvanize
Speaker 12: behind that, we justify a war with Iran. However, somehow
Speaker 12: Donald Trump would survive this debacle and then exposed that
Speaker 12: it was actually is real, and along with that that
Speaker 12: would be the catalyst for Oh, also Massad is involved
Speaker 12: in these blackmail operations and all of that was gonna
Speaker 12: start coming out. But I mean, seems this is actually
Speaker 12: the video that you posted, Clint. I mean, if you
Speaker 12: guys don't want to watch it.
Speaker 11: Cause what it seems is that for the first time
Speaker 11: in American history, it seems like the president is one
Speaker 11: step ahead of the people who would be blackmailing him.
Speaker 11: It's almost like he's learned.
Speaker 9: From the first time.
Speaker 11: Way Yeah, and now it's just it just doesn't seem
Speaker 11: to be it doesn't seem to be flowing that direction.
Speaker 9: Which I just.
Speaker 12: Want to show this for the the audience's sake so
Speaker 12: they could see this, because look, I know, Clint, you're
Speaker 12: just musing on this and it's just based off of
Speaker 12: the facial expressions of a guy. But like I see
Speaker 12: the same thing, and I think the audience should see this.
Speaker 12: But you said, okay, this is interesting. BB scenes none
Speaker 12: to please. As Trump talks about the US owning Gaza,
Speaker 12: I think he's negotiating against net and Yahoo in real time.
Speaker 9: It's a short clip, but I just want.
Speaker 12: Toss this up because if you watch the guy's face,
Speaker 12: it just looks like he's surprised, which is not.
Speaker 3: And you can also hear, please, you can also hear
Speaker 3: what Trump is saying. So this is important.
Speaker 5: The US will tip over the Gaza Strip and we
Speaker 5: will do a job with it to weilload it and
Speaker 5: be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous unexploded bombs
Speaker 5: and other weapons.
Speaker 9: Think he is level the.
Speaker 13: Sight and get rid of the destroyed buildings. Level it,
Speaker 13: create an economic development that will supply unlimited numbers of
Speaker 13: jobs and housing for the people of the area, a
Speaker 13: real job, do something different.
Speaker 5: Just can't go back. If you go back, it's gonna
Speaker 5: end up the same way it has for a hundred years.
Speaker 9: I'm hopeful.
Speaker 3: In the beginning more enduring face.
Speaker 5: That will lend the bloodshed and killing once and for all.
Speaker 13: With the same goal in mind.
Speaker 5: My administration has been moving quickly to restore trust in
Speaker 5: the Alliance and rebuild American strength throughout the region, and
Speaker 5: we've really done that.
Speaker 9: We're a respective look.
Speaker 12: I just want to say, for people that think we're
Speaker 12: reading too much into this, you have to take into
Speaker 12: account how important body language is between world leaders. Now,
Speaker 12: what I recognize as somebody that's pretty familiar with body
Speaker 12: language is that once you start moving around and making
Speaker 12: facial expressions and touching things, this is kind of a
Speaker 12: self soothing mechanism. It's to detach from the uncomfortable thing
Speaker 12: that's happening in front of you and to put your
Speaker 12: focus elsewhere to alleviate some of the stresses that are
Speaker 12: being caused by this event. And if you don't think
Speaker 12: that body language is important, you need only look at
Speaker 12: every time one world leader meets another one.
Speaker 9: There is a jocking for a handshake position.
Speaker 12: So if you have the top position in the handshake,
Speaker 12: that is a dominant position. But sometimes you won't get that,
Speaker 12: and so what will have and instead, and Trump does
Speaker 12: this a lot, is he will then reach for the
Speaker 12: back of your elbow and pull your whole body in
Speaker 12: towards him. This is all about displays of dominance on
Speaker 12: the world stage. These people are trained in that they
Speaker 12: know very well how appearances go when it comes to
Speaker 12: physical body language. So for him to be displaying all
Speaker 12: of that, he looks nervous and you have to get
Speaker 12: take into consideration. Maybe it seems like we're blowing that
Speaker 12: out of proportion because it's very subtle. But once again,
Speaker 12: these are people who are trained in this. This is
Speaker 12: something that all these world leaders do when they get.
Speaker 2: Together, particularly and Yahoo is trained, yes part particularly Trump
Speaker 2: I think learned it the way I did. Like, I
Speaker 2: was a semi professional poker player in my twenties, so
Speaker 2: I learned to read people through poker. I never, like, actually,
Speaker 2: you know, took classes. I was never a massad age
Speaker 2: and I never got taught like this is this is
Speaker 2: what you look for, this is how you do it.
Speaker 2: I just played a fucking ton of poker and I realized, like,
Speaker 2: these are tells. This is what this is a tell,
Speaker 2: This is a tell. I think Trump probably did the
Speaker 2: same way. High level business negotiations. You start to learn
Speaker 2: how to read people. You do that for fifty years,
Speaker 2: you're gonna be fucking great at understanding body language. And
Speaker 2: you're also gonna be great at controlling your own same
Speaker 2: thing as a poker player. If you see a telling somebody,
Speaker 2: you're gonna make the fuck sure you don't do that, right,
Speaker 2: So these are all self taughtn Ya who is selfn ya.
Speaker 3: Who ain't self taught?
Speaker 2: I mean he may be that too, but he is
Speaker 2: definitely fucking taught how to make and his his the
Speaker 2: tension he has, the way he's he's holding the podium
Speaker 2: very very firmly, but he's he's glancing back at the audience.
Speaker 2: There's kind of a rise smile. It's not it's not
Speaker 2: a full smile. It's like it's like, can you believe
Speaker 2: this motherfucker? Like what is he saying right now? And
Speaker 2: then he looks at the audience as if he's like,
Speaker 2: I want to see what their reaction is. Like, I
Speaker 2: think that's what he was doing when he looks at
Speaker 2: the audience. And then as as Trump continues and he's like,
Speaker 2: he's like he's gonna back off. Trump doesn't doesn't back off.
Speaker 2: He snaps his head and he looks at him again,
Speaker 2: and then he kind of rolls his eyes and I'm like, look, yes,
Speaker 2: i'm reading. I'm reading like this old doesn't amps like.
Speaker 2: I don't know for a fact, but that looked like
Speaker 2: he was not read in.
Speaker 11: It was a it was an extreme power move on.
Speaker 11: So obviously the body language from BB is like it's
Speaker 11: not a man that's getting what he wants. That's what
Speaker 11: I'm seeing right away. But what I'm hearing from Trump
Speaker 11: is not this like shit post. He like, believe me,
Speaker 11: we're gonna go in there and do It's like it's
Speaker 11: a somber tone, and he does that sort of thing
Speaker 11: when he's presenting something that's like that he would think
Speaker 11: is important. And he's saying this in this somber tone
Speaker 11: as if like it's unfortunate, but this is what we're
Speaker 11: gonna do. And I'm like, to me, that seems very serious,
Speaker 11: Like he understands that Bbe's not gonna like what he's
Speaker 11: saying there, and that's why he's presenting it in that way.
Speaker 11: And then he doubles down like it's like not, I
Speaker 11: know it's gonna come as a surprise to you, but
Speaker 11: we're taking Gaza. And also I'm just gonna insult you
Speaker 11: and say for the last hundred years this hasn't worked.
Speaker 11: They haven't been able to figure it out. And honestly,
Speaker 11: like what Trump is doing with Gaza right now in Palestine,
Speaker 11: I'm looking at it and I'm like, people are like, oh,
Speaker 11: I told you he's a Zionist. Thought of all this
Speaker 11: and that, what are the choice do you have? Like
Speaker 11: this place is destroyed, These people have nowhere to go.
Speaker 11: I'd be like, listen, you gotta go, Like they're gonna
Speaker 11: kill you, you gotta go. Something's gonna happen here. But like,
Speaker 11: if if we are to get involved, what do you
Speaker 11: do split it? Try to fucking do a two state solution. Again,
Speaker 11: it doesn't work.
Speaker 9: I'm sorry.
Speaker 12: If I may get you know fully Schitzo. Within the
Speaker 12: QAnon community, it is worth mentioning here because this is
Speaker 12: something that's tied into Donald Trump's story. Uh, there is
Speaker 12: this notion that they're saving Israel for last. So I
Speaker 12: just think it's significant to then create a military presence
Speaker 12: right there on the border of a country that is
Speaker 12: allegedly being saved for last by Donald Trump or Q plus.
Speaker 12: And and to people that's go off at that for a.
Speaker 11: Second, Clint, what do you think about that the saved
Speaker 11: for last?
Speaker 3: Yeah? I don't. I don't know what that means.
Speaker 12: So, Okay, this thousand foot overview is it's basically like
Speaker 12: I know everybody's familiar with with Q but just to
Speaker 12: break it down.
Speaker 9: It's doing a lot of shit, a lot of shit.
Speaker 11: And when asked about Israel by some of these right
Speaker 11: wing people, this is what he says.
Speaker 12: Is the only notion is that they're saving Israel for last.
Speaker 12: And you have to keep in mind that the central figure,
Speaker 12: like the overhead sort of power figure is Donald Trump
Speaker 12: within the QAnon narrative, and people who think that that's
Speaker 12: just some sort of a larp, it's like, look at
Speaker 12: the information they're disseminating. These people are still finding validation
Speaker 12: in it today, even though apparently it's been years since
Speaker 12: whoever this you know, mysterious military intelligence was has stopped
Speaker 12: disseminating this information. So I think it's a real psychological
Speaker 12: operation that's taking place, and I think we will see
Speaker 12: the implications of it. That does not mean that their
Speaker 12: narrative is correct, but it's certainly something that's real and
Speaker 12: is making people sort of pied piper down this line
Speaker 12: and look at Donald Trump as a savior figure.
Speaker 9: So, you know, saving them.
Speaker 2: For last, to saving them for last mean that we're
Speaker 2: going to separate, as you know, the power center will
Speaker 2: separate in the America, will become autonomous again.
Speaker 3: Is that the concept?
Speaker 9: I don't Well, it's like it's just what they say sentiment.
Speaker 11: They've never mentioned Israel and really any of the q posts.
Speaker 11: And then that goes to like people like oh, well,
Speaker 11: you guys are just a bunch of Zionists or you know,
Speaker 11: right wing neo conservatives, that's why. And finally when they
Speaker 11: do respond about it, listen, this is all crazy shit,
Speaker 11: but they've been proven right many times. But when they
Speaker 11: finally do respond about Israel, and this is in twenty
Speaker 11: twenty one, they go, we're saving it for last and
Speaker 11: well whatever, maybe they are, maybe this is all bullshit,
Speaker 11: But what I'm looking at is like, it doesn't look
Speaker 11: like that that this is bullshit right now. It looks
Speaker 11: like he has just told Israel like, we're not doing that,
Speaker 11: and now like he's starting to actually inflame tensions with Israel,
Speaker 11: which I can't think of a time where America has
Speaker 11: done that. Literally, anytime Israel needs something, it's always yes,
Speaker 11: like yes, our greatest ally, whatever you need. There's never
Speaker 11: any pushback against them. This was the most pushback you
Speaker 11: can get. They've been trying to take this land for
Speaker 11: one hundred years and you just told him no.
Speaker 9: I would just like I said, if you.
Speaker 12: Get Israel involved and we find out the Masad element
Speaker 12: that connects to allegedly connects to all of this Epstein
Speaker 12: P Diddy shit, this could be the final piece of
Speaker 12: the puzzle, and we could watch all these things come
Speaker 12: to fruition at once, which is a stretch, you know,
Speaker 12: in this business. I'm used to nothing happening at all,
Speaker 12: but seems like it might.
Speaker 2: I'll have to see that to be a believer, you know,
Speaker 2: I'd be I'd be much more prone to think, you
Speaker 2: guys might be honest.
Speaker 3: Something.
Speaker 2: If when we did the entire funding freeze to all
Speaker 2: foreign aid except for Israel, h had had the foreign
Speaker 2: had the funding freeze for all foreign aid then all
Speaker 2: foreign aid, I would have been like, yeah, man, that's
Speaker 2: a big thing, Like that's a that's a shot across
Speaker 2: the bow between our fielty to them. But that that
Speaker 2: didn't happen, So I don't know, I don't know how
Speaker 2: to read that. I still think that like in some
Speaker 2: regards like now Net and Yahoo and this again, this
Speaker 2: could be negotiating because Net Yahoo, over the past week
Speaker 2: since this you know, awkward moment happened, has been going
Speaker 2: this is a fucking great idea, and he's all on
Speaker 2: board now, But that could be a negotiating tactic to
Speaker 2: try and be like like to save face in his
Speaker 2: own country, Like no, this I'm still in control. I
Speaker 2: still got this dude, he's doing what I want, you know,
Speaker 2: or maybe it is maybe like he's had another conversation
Speaker 2: with Trump, and the plan is we have American peacekeepers
Speaker 2: come in there, they help with the you know, remaining
Speaker 2: ethnic cleansing, and then they turn it over to us
Speaker 2: for the Greater Israel project. Like maybe that's what it is.
Speaker 2: So this is it's very it's just too hard to
Speaker 2: know at this point.
Speaker 12: I wonder how the government of Israel looks towards us
Speaker 12: right now, in this situation where we talked about earlier,
Speaker 12: how they're you know, we're going back to two genders. Baby,
Speaker 12: I don't know if you heard, there's only two genders again, right,
Speaker 12: And so Israel or Tel Aviv is like the the
Speaker 12: LGB capital of the planet is something I learned recently.
Speaker 12: I didn't know that they have more homost per capita
Speaker 12: than pretty much any other place. So I wonder how
Speaker 12: those things are going to play going forward.
Speaker 9: I just want to we just.
Speaker 11: Put a tax on, we put a tariff on homosexuality
Speaker 11: from Israel.
Speaker 9: They're not going to like that, not taking any more.
Speaker 12: We're not important any more of your homo's twenty five
Speaker 12: percent tax. Look, I don't know in that way. Culturally,
Speaker 12: we're starting to pry away from Israel, right where a
Speaker 12: lot of people look at Israel's influence and then look
Speaker 12: at what happened over the past decade with.
Speaker 9: The LGBTQ community.
Speaker 12: I think I got all the letters right, and they
Speaker 12: don't see that as a coincidence, and I would agree
Speaker 12: with that. I think that they've, you know, part of
Speaker 12: their influence on our country is that cultural influence as well.
Speaker 12: I wonder how they're looking at us now with this
Speaker 12: big revelation that, you know, truth is there's only two genders.
Speaker 12: We're also stopping any federal funding of gender reassignment surgery
Speaker 12: or you know, gender affirmation procedures or anything else like that.
Speaker 12: I I'm not saying that that means, Look, we're definitely
Speaker 12: pulling away from Israel, but I think cultural displays are.
Speaker 9: Very impactful there.
Speaker 12: They are very important when we draw a line in
Speaker 12: the sand and we say here in the West, we're
Speaker 12: not doing that shit anymore. You know, we're not funding
Speaker 12: these surgeries anymore, we're not funding hormone therapy, We're not
Speaker 12: getting involved in that. And in fact, we're looking into prosecuting,
Speaker 12: one way or another, any medical professionals that were involved
Speaker 12: in those procedures over this past decade. That's got to
Speaker 12: be a huge signal. If you're Israel and you're all
Speaker 12: about the homos, You're looking over at us and you're going,
Speaker 12: that's not good.
Speaker 9: We didn't. We may have worked really hard to establish
Speaker 9: that kind of culture in America.
Speaker 2: Well from a you know, libertarian perspective, a tariff on
Speaker 2: their homos is actually attacks on our homos.
Speaker 3: So sorry, I just supid joke.
Speaker 9: Stupid joke, but I just in economics.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I just wanted to make the point that if
Speaker 2: you want to prove out that Q post and whether
Speaker 2: or not we're actually separating in terms of power structures,
Speaker 2: I'll give you a really easy tell. The USAID funding
Speaker 2: is oftentimes done not just to our soft power benefit,
Speaker 2: but also to Israel's. Additionally, all of these disclosures that
Speaker 2: are coming out about how USI defunds these NGOs to
Speaker 2: assist with the migrant crisis, some.
Speaker 3: Of those are Jewish.
Speaker 2: Okay, So if we only hear about the Catholic NGOs
Speaker 2: or the Christian NGOs that are responsible and the funding
Speaker 2: gets ripped out, of those organizations, but the you know
Speaker 2: highest doesn't, well, then we're still fucking definitely not separating.
Speaker 2: So I think that'll be an interesting tell over the
Speaker 2: next six months.
Speaker 12: One of the interesting things though, that's happening in the
Speaker 12: culture right now is this big JQ thing that we're
Speaker 12: you know, we end up talking about a lot on
Speaker 12: all the shows that we do, and it's like, on
Speaker 12: the how.
Speaker 11: Could it not be an attack on and again it's
Speaker 11: like I feel bad, like we're dragging Clint into this
Speaker 11: JQ thing, but it's like it's an important question when
Speaker 11: you realistically look at the people who do make some
Speaker 11: they make the decisions for movies, for music, or just
Speaker 11: about anything that we consume.
Speaker 9: Nearing our culture. They're part of the cultural engineering.
Speaker 11: Machine pharmaceuticals to even now Christianity, which Christianity is having
Speaker 11: its own movement where it's like breaking away. There's so
Speaker 11: many people who are recognizing what the church is and
Speaker 11: they're saying like, and the church, I think is a
Speaker 11: great thing. It's great for people to go to church,
Speaker 11: but so many people that we speak to are like,
Speaker 11: I can't go anymore because it's not it's like a business.
Speaker 11: It's not what it says that it's supposed to be.
Speaker 11: And I think that a lot of that is because
Speaker 11: there's outside influence within it. But so that's breaking away,
Speaker 11: Hollywood's breaking apart. The music industry is, you know, like
Speaker 11: just being teared at the seams. Just about anything that
Speaker 11: the media is done, it's dead. So all the apparatus
Speaker 11: that were pushed up or at least held in place
Speaker 11: by let's just say whatever, Jews, they're at least the
Speaker 11: ones on top. They're the ones that we see. So
Speaker 11: I think that it's possible that they are middleman when
Speaker 11: it does come down to the greater scheme of things.
Speaker 11: But whatever, let's for argument's sake, Israel the people who
Speaker 11: are influencing these people to make tell, you know, make
Speaker 11: a gay buzz light year, and it just so happens
Speaker 11: that it's like Greenberg every single time whatever. People are
Speaker 11: noticing this stuff, and now the foundation of their structure
Speaker 11: is crumbling because of this guy, Donald Trump. You can
Speaker 11: give them all the aid in the world. We can
Speaker 11: cut all the aid except for the Israel. But we've
Speaker 11: just cut off every one of your pillars of in yea,
Speaker 11: every one of your institutions that you've either captured or
Speaker 11: have planted here well and shaken them.
Speaker 9: To their core.
Speaker 12: You just describe the propaganda machine, the very thing that
Speaker 12: creates the culture that we find ourselves in.
Speaker 9: Now.
Speaker 12: It's like culture is no longer an organic thing that
Speaker 12: takes place. It's an intelligence agency operation that is pushed
Speaker 12: on us. But on the twentieth January twentieth, I said
Speaker 12: it's time for Kanye West to re emerge. And that
Speaker 12: was a kind of a lucky call on my shot.
Speaker 12: But the reason that I made that call is I
Speaker 12: looked at where we were in the theater, and I
Speaker 12: looked at the conversation taking place around the Jews, and
Speaker 12: I said, yeah, we're at almost at a tipping point.
Speaker 12: What we need right now is the re emergence of
Speaker 12: Kanye West. And then, certainly, you know, as as Sure's
Speaker 12: as Rain, he shows up. I don't know what it
Speaker 12: was like. Ten days later and he starts, I mean,
Speaker 12: he does nothing but jew shit. He also shows us
Speaker 12: his wife's tits and you know, says some funny things
Speaker 12: on but mostly it was like, I think he came
Speaker 12: to push that narrative a little bit further and think
Speaker 12: of Kanye West, however you want that we just talked
Speaker 12: about the music industry Hollywood. I mean, those two for
Speaker 12: sure have been captured by some sort of nefarious influence
Speaker 12: that seems to be of a Burgerwitz or a Stein
Speaker 12: nature every single fucking time, right, And so you have
Speaker 12: this character from.
Speaker 9: Again I know, very uncomfortable.
Speaker 12: But it's just look look this with saying I don't
Speaker 12: it's not like I don't Jews. And I also think
Speaker 12: that we're being shepherded down this path to notice and
Speaker 12: I think that it's not fucking it's not that it's
Speaker 12: not real. In order for us to notice anything, there
Speaker 12: has to be an element of truth, but I don't
Speaker 12: think it's the end all be all. And a lot
Speaker 12: of people are just stopping at you and they're screaming,
Speaker 12: and if you don't denounce the Jews, then you're a
Speaker 12: piece of shit. It's a real it's retarded. But I
Speaker 12: think that we're being culturally primed in some way. And
Speaker 12: I don't know who's doing it and for what reason,
Speaker 12: but all these things are pointing to everybody getting Jew fatigue,
Speaker 12: everybody getting fed up with Israel's influence, and now you
Speaker 12: have this Gaza thing, and I don't know, man, I do.
Speaker 12: I feel as though I'm not saying we're going to
Speaker 12: break away from Israel's influence and we're going to have
Speaker 12: this big accusation moment from the American public to the Jews.
Speaker 12: But if there ever was a time where that sort
Speaker 12: of thing would happen, we're moving towards it.
Speaker 3: Okay, I mean it's an interesting theory.
Speaker 2: I'm still I still function for like, just to put
Speaker 2: my biases on the table. My my assumption or my
Speaker 2: assessment of our control structures for a very long time,
Speaker 2: has been that it is largely CIA that is responsible
Speaker 2: for for narrative framing. CIA is not exclusively a Jewish
Speaker 2: rand enterprise.
Speaker 9: It's like it's a Catholic thing.
Speaker 12: Well, can I interject, how do you think those things
Speaker 12: play together? Cia and Massade?
Speaker 9: I'm just curious.
Speaker 11: Do you think how do you think Catholicism and Judaism
Speaker 11: play together like the Vatican specifically.
Speaker 2: You'd have to educate me on that, but I will
Speaker 2: say I do know that Cia Massad work hand in
Speaker 2: hand a lot. I think there's a distinct possibility that
Speaker 2: f Seine was a either dual or triple agent, and
Speaker 2: I think that he worked for a Masad and Cia.
Speaker 2: But please, I would like actually like to hear what
Speaker 2: you have to say about how Catholicism and Judaism intertwine.
Speaker 11: Yeah, so it's it's kind of like, uh, the Catholicism.
Speaker 11: There's a there's a line of thought where people think
Speaker 11: that Vatican, the Vatican and Catholicism are basically a brain
Speaker 11: away government, which they kind of are. They operate in.
Speaker 11: They're is a sovereign nation. They operate by themselves. They
Speaker 11: have their own rules, their rulers there, and they wield
Speaker 11: immense amounts of power. They were the first people to
Speaker 11: start blackmail with the idea of the confession. So the
Speaker 11: confession is not in the Bible. Nowhere in the Bible
Speaker 11: does it say to go into a room and speak
Speaker 11: to your priests and tell him all the deep dark
Speaker 11: secrets that you have. Because that what they've done, what
Speaker 11: the Catholic Church has done, is made themselves intermediates between
Speaker 11: you and God. And nowhere in the Bible does it
Speaker 11: say that, and especially not after the New Testament.
Speaker 2: So let me let me add real quick that scientology
Speaker 2: really like mastered the idea of the confessional in order
Speaker 2: to get to the higher levels you had to, Like
Speaker 2: the one of the early levels was to tell them
Speaker 2: all of your worst secrets and they would video it,
Speaker 2: so then it was just like it was like you
Speaker 2: were fucking owned after that. So yeah, I think that
Speaker 2: there's a real argument to be had that the Confessionals
Speaker 2: was about that. And it just makes sense if you're
Speaker 2: if you're one of the most powerful institutions, which for
Speaker 2: hundreds of years the Catholic Church was maybe even thousands,
Speaker 2: I don't know, like you need to have some control
Speaker 2: of of other power centers that rise up to challenge you.
Speaker 2: So it makes it makes perfect sense that you would
Speaker 2: you would you know, create some sort of blackmail network
Speaker 2: to do so.
Speaker 11: There's an argument. I mean, they were one of the first.
Speaker 11: It's it's really nothing new under the sun, but like
Speaker 11: in current history, they were one of the first to
Speaker 11: really do this blackmail system and perfect it. So yeah,
Speaker 11: scientology kind of just copied off of Catholicism. They got
Speaker 11: busted for doing it, and it's fairly obvious, but Catholicism
Speaker 11: does it to the highest levels and degree at it.
Speaker 9: We do talk about it a little bit, but nobody
Speaker 9: really puts it together.
Speaker 11: Where again, like you're looking at I'm looking at the CIA,
Speaker 11: and you're looking at these people like a John Brennan,
Speaker 11: Roman Catholic. I wouldn't be like he's a Jew. It's like, no,
Speaker 11: he's an Irishman. He's a Roman Catholic. Most of these
Speaker 11: people that are in these huge positions of power are
Speaker 11: Roman Catholic. And then underneath them we've got this, uh,
Speaker 11: the Judaism, the Jews doing certain things. It's almost like
Speaker 11: the Jews are the fall guys for these dudes that
Speaker 11: are kind of pulling the puppet strings.
Speaker 2: This has been an argument that's gone back for a
Speaker 2: long time. There was a lot of lot of you know,
Speaker 2: questioning as to who's responsible for central banking for instance.
Speaker 2: But the truth is is that like it was the
Speaker 2: city of London, you know, it was like it was
Speaker 2: London banks, and like not not all of them were Jewish.
Speaker 2: So I think I think it's very it's very hard
Speaker 2: to like distinguish And this is this is ultimately why,
Speaker 2: like you you think that I'm uncomfortable when I'm like,
Speaker 2: you know, smirking or shaking my head when you.
Speaker 3: Guys talk about this stuff. But it's it's just that
Speaker 3: I disagree.
Speaker 2: It's that it's that I think that that it's obvious
Speaker 2: that Israel has immense control over the American govern they
Speaker 2: also have immense control over certain apparatus of our media.
Speaker 2: There's it's irrefutable. I would be lying if I said otherwise.
Speaker 2: But I just don't think it's all them, Like, I
Speaker 2: just don't, and I think there's a tremendous amount of
Speaker 2: evidence that it's not all them. So I think that's
Speaker 2: That's what I hate about the whole JQ movement is
Speaker 2: that it's just this obsession where all of a sudden,
Speaker 2: it's like, Yeah, John Brennan, who's one of the most evil,
Speaker 2: nefarious motherfuckers to ever walked the planet, he doesn't get
Speaker 2: talked about by most of the JQ pushing psychos like
Speaker 2: they don't. They don't pay attention to him because he
Speaker 2: doesn't fit their mold exactly. So that's why I don't
Speaker 2: like the mold is because it ignores obvious bad actors
Speaker 2: because he's not Jewish.
Speaker 3: That's me, he's stupid.
Speaker 11: You need that's the crazy part. You need this mold, right,
Speaker 11: Like I people need to be talking about base level
Speaker 11: like because Jews are surface level stuff. Really, it's what
Speaker 11: we're presented. It's so obvious, like like how about Like
Speaker 11: they're like, what if we put this guy and we
Speaker 11: tell him to create you know again like a gay
Speaker 11: buzz light Year, but put a small hat.
Speaker 9: On him and make it what should he look like?
Speaker 11: His nose should be freakously large. It's like it's almost
Speaker 11: too obvious, like does he look like make him look
Speaker 11: exactly like the bad guy in every movie? Like it's
Speaker 11: what it is. It's too obvious that like we're meant
Speaker 11: to notice this stuff. So it's like, well, who is
Speaker 11: really calling the shots? And there's a line of thinking
Speaker 11: that you know, the Roman Empire never really fell, but
Speaker 11: it rebranded, it rebranded into a religion, and that religion
Speaker 11: turned into Roman Catholicism, and then you get the Vatican,
Speaker 11: and then you get all kinds of core. I mean,
Speaker 11: forget about listen the Epstein stuff, all the stuff that
Speaker 11: the Jews do, like the Confession, the blackmail, the Epstein stuff,
Speaker 11: the child rape. The Catholic Church has been doing this
Speaker 11: for years, yeah, and we talk about it, but nobody
Speaker 11: really cares.
Speaker 2: And it's but I'm not sure anybody's rape more kids
Speaker 2: than the Catholic Church.
Speaker 12: Like they're kind of like the best at it.
Speaker 3: That I didn't mean it like that, but.
Speaker 9: Somebody's somebody's got to be good at it.
Speaker 12: There's got to be a best, doesn't just I'm just
Speaker 12: saying it's we're just statistically speaking, Clint, how long would
Speaker 12: you consider yourself having been like a conspiracy theorist?
Speaker 3: Oh? Forever? Definitely.
Speaker 2: Nine to eleven was definitely when I like became a
Speaker 2: real conspiracy theorist.
Speaker 12: So when you were younger and you're going through this
Speaker 12: and you're trying to share this with people, what was
Speaker 12: the typical response that you would get.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, most of my friends, like I became
Speaker 2: friends because we saw the world similarly, So they didn't
Speaker 2: treat me like a pride for feeling these ways. But
Speaker 2: you know, if I try to talk to someone who's
Speaker 2: not my friend about it, they'd be like, what are
Speaker 2: you talking about?
Speaker 3: You know, like you sound like a crazy person.
Speaker 12: Right, And so what I'm seeing right now is all
Speaker 12: of a sudden, we have like a massive amount of people.
Speaker 12: And you could say, to some degree this is because
Speaker 12: of the adventity Internet, or because Elon Musk has implemented
Speaker 12: free speech on X and now people are allowed to
Speaker 12: discuss these things freely. But when I was younger and
Speaker 12: I was going through this, I found that the vast
Speaker 12: majority of people who were not my friends to your point, Clint,
Speaker 12: were completely unreceptive to this. And I've never been in
Speaker 12: a pool where suddenly thousands of people and sure, maybe
Speaker 12: they're all consolidated on X, but thousands of people are
Speaker 12: now expert noticers. And I don't think that we've had
Speaker 12: some sort of elevation in our perception. I don't think
Speaker 12: that the average person is more intelligent than they used
Speaker 12: to be, or more XYZ, more per I don't think
Speaker 12: that that's the case. I think that there were dealing
Speaker 12: with a giant portion of the population who doesn't wake
Speaker 12: up and who doesn't follow anything as far as narratives go.
Speaker 12: That wasn't handed to them. So when I look around
Speaker 12: now and I see all these people are just expert
Speaker 12: level Jew noticers, and they're also turning around to you,
Speaker 12: and you're saying, if you dare have nuance in this
Speaker 12: conversation meaning Jews, Jesuits, the Synagogue of Satan, what have you, Well,
Speaker 12: then you're a shill and you're running defense for the
Speaker 12: Jews and so I have to ask myself, are these
Speaker 12: people just really good at what they do, because because
Speaker 12: last time I looked around, nobody noticed shit that was happening.
Speaker 12: We were constantly psyoped and then funneled into some sort
Speaker 12: of action like nine to eleven. I don't think that
Speaker 12: people are better, dude. I think that the bar for
Speaker 12: entry just got lowered dramatically. And it's because they want
Speaker 12: you to see this, because nothing has changed. People are
Speaker 12: still lemmings in that way, right They're called sheep for
Speaker 12: a reason. They go wherever the herder takes them. And
Speaker 12: right now the herder has lowered the bar for entry
Speaker 12: and they're showing you this thing, and people are disturbed.
Speaker 3: Dude.
Speaker 9: They woke up during COVID. It's very scary to wake
Speaker 9: up to.
Speaker 12: The fact that the official narrative is not at all
Speaker 12: the truth, and so you clamor onto the first thing
Speaker 12: that looks like it's truth.
Speaker 9: Well, they just gave you one.
Speaker 12: And so now everybody is screaming about the Jews, but
Speaker 12: they're the same old retards.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's an interesting correlation.
Speaker 2: Causation is in doubt here because you have Israel's response
Speaker 2: to the Hamas attacks, a year and a half ago,
Speaker 2: and it coincides perfectly with this immense rise in you know,
Speaker 2: you can noticing other people call anti semitism whatever it's like, like,
Speaker 2: I don't know, I don't know for sure, but I
Speaker 2: will say this, it is of tremendous benefit for there
Speaker 2: to be a rise in anti Semitism scare quotes when
Speaker 2: you're blowing the fuck out of a lot of kids,
Speaker 2: because then you get to frame yourself as a victim
Speaker 2: as opposed to a perpetrator.
Speaker 3: So if I, if I was in.
Speaker 2: Charge of narrative control for the nation of Israel, I
Speaker 2: would say, hey, let's have just immense amounts of anti
Speaker 2: Semitism posted online like like it would be a huge
Speaker 2: benefit to them, because what it has done is it
Speaker 2: has taken a lot of normies that otherwise would have
Speaker 2: looked at the death and destruction of tens of thousands
Speaker 2: of innocent women and children and would have said, man,
Speaker 2: I don't fucking like this at all. And because they
Speaker 2: see so many posts just going like Jews, Jews, Jews,
Speaker 2: that they don't say shit, they don't say anything at
Speaker 2: all because they don't want to be put into that camp.
Speaker 2: So I'm not saying that's what's happening. But I will say,
Speaker 2: obviously that could be what's happening.
Speaker 3: It could be.
Speaker 9: I don't know, man, I just you understand that argument.
Speaker 12: No, I completely understand what you're saying, and without any proof,
Speaker 12: that is the reasonable approach to take. I myself am
Speaker 12: not a reasonable man, and so when I look at
Speaker 12: the fact that.
Speaker 3: This is dangerous retards so just just say it.
Speaker 12: When I look at the fact that they've been engineering
Speaker 12: all these I mean, you know, we go back on
Speaker 12: Nephelum de squad to the idea of like Laurel Canyon
Speaker 12: and the CIA engineering the or co opting the anti
Speaker 12: war movement, giving us the doors in Jim Morrison, I mean,
Speaker 12: they there's not anything that's promising that an intelligence agency.
Speaker 9: Won't co opt. They are always manufacturing a narrative.
Speaker 12: So if you just stop for a second and imagine
Speaker 12: that they never cease manufacturing a narrative, and you ask
Speaker 12: yourself what narrative are we being subjected to on right now?
Speaker 3: Exactly?
Speaker 2: See, that's the that's the hard part though, is that
Speaker 2: like if you if you just accept at face value
Speaker 2: that whatever the current zeitgeist is is in manipulation. Well
Speaker 2: then you're basically giving up all human autonomy. You just
Speaker 2: you're just like everything's a sigo Like maybe you I
Speaker 2: see it, you know you US US three cup, but
Speaker 2: nobody else does you know it? Like right, it gives
Speaker 2: this air of like I'm I'm so much smarter, you know,
Speaker 2: like a lot of the people, a lot of the
Speaker 2: people that get that really gave me shit for voting
Speaker 2: for Trump, were like, you just fucking don't know.
Speaker 9: You just don't see.
Speaker 2: You don't know that the fucking ai technocratic gulag is
Speaker 2: being rolled out right underneath your nose, Like, bitch, I
Speaker 2: understand everything, Okay.
Speaker 9: I am smarter than your motherfucker.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's like I know, I know all of the risks,
Speaker 2: but you know what the real risk was nuclear fucking
Speaker 2: hell fire. Like that was my bench point, not yours,
Speaker 2: since you guys don't believe in knokes, but you know
Speaker 2: what I'm.
Speaker 12: Saying, bombs, dude, don't say I believe in big bombs.
Speaker 11: Like, so you didn't vote, You didn't vote for RFK
Speaker 11: and getting like you know, poison out of children's food.
Speaker 2: You didn't want to because because he might roll out
Speaker 2: the CBDC which undoubtedly would have been rolled out under
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3: Anyways, it's like, all right that you're you're such a
Speaker 3: fucking genius. Anyways.
Speaker 2: Uh, the point I'm making is that, like, I still
Speaker 2: think that it's very important that regardless of like how
Speaker 2: aware we are of narrative framing, a narrative control, that
Speaker 2: you still you still trust that some percentage of the
Speaker 2: population has genuine autonomy and capacity for critical thought. And
Speaker 2: that's what I rely on actually, because that that's the
Speaker 2: audience that I try and reach, and I've and I've
Speaker 2: grown a pretty significant audience, and it's like I wouldn't
Speaker 2: want to insult them. I I genuinely believe that these
Speaker 2: are some of the like the most awake, critical thinking
Speaker 2: people that exist.
Speaker 9: And I agree with that. Clinton.
Speaker 12: Let me ask you then, and this is speculation, but
Speaker 12: you can toss a number out at me. What percentage
Speaker 12: of the population do you think that is that is
Speaker 12: made up of critical thinkers?
Speaker 3: Maybe? Maybe fifteen twenty maybe?
Speaker 9: And I would agree with that as well.
Speaker 12: And so yeah, I would say, predominantly speaking, human beings
Speaker 12: behave like herd animals. Right, That's where we get the
Speaker 12: idea of Lemmings from We're all running towards a cliff,
Speaker 12: and none of us are smart enough to act as
Speaker 12: an individual and stop running with the crowd, or maybe
Speaker 12: some of us are about fifteen to twenty percent, And
Speaker 12: so if.
Speaker 2: There's a thousand people running towards a cliff, one hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty will be like, what the fuck are we doing?
Speaker 9: Even that feels generous, but yeah, I agree with that.
Speaker 12: So I just happen to look right now at X
Speaker 12: and we all like to fancy ourselves critical thinkers on X, right,
Speaker 12: And I temper that with saying constantly that I'm fucking
Speaker 12: retarded and I'm wrong very very often. In fact, I
Speaker 12: think it's just the nature of trying to find the
Speaker 12: truth of what's happening in that since it is obscured
Speaker 12: from you, you're going to be wrong many times on
Speaker 12: the way there. I do not see people saying, hey,
Speaker 12: I'm retarded and I'm often wrong, But this is a
Speaker 12: thing that I'm seeing right now. What I see is
Speaker 12: masses of people saying this is what the fuck it is,
Speaker 12: and if you deviate, you are a fed And that
Speaker 12: is like, oh, okay, you guys can't see the cliff
Speaker 12: you're running towards.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, you know what it is is that eighty
Speaker 2: percent of people only want to listen to someone that
Speaker 2: talks with definitive answers. Yes, that's true, and I think
Speaker 2: that's that's the niche that we feel is that you know,
Speaker 2: I'm I'm very open about like this. These are my opinions,
Speaker 2: and these are the things I'm certain of, and these
Speaker 2: are the things that I'm not and these are you know,
Speaker 2: these are the ideas I'm working on. It's like, I
Speaker 2: think that that level of honesty certain you know, there's
Speaker 2: certain percentage of people that really want to hear that
Speaker 2: because that's actually how they think about the world, and
Speaker 2: they're not interested in having someone just bullshit them because
Speaker 2: there's so many people out there that are bullshitting us.
Speaker 2: This is actually a really interesting metaphor that as you
Speaker 2: were talking about it, I just thought, like, really highlights
Speaker 2: perhaps why such a small percentage of people stop running
Speaker 2: towards the cliff. If you actually think about what it
Speaker 2: is to see a thousand people running towards a cliff,
Speaker 2: it's only the people in the front that can see
Speaker 2: the cliff and the people on the edges that can
Speaker 2: see the cliff. So it's like you only have probably
Speaker 2: fifteen percent of the herd that can actually see where
Speaker 2: we're going. I think that's a great metaphor for actually
Speaker 2: what like how humanity functions. It's really only fifteen or
Speaker 2: twenty percent that have foresight, that have the ability to
Speaker 2: see what's ahead of us, and sometimes they're wrong. Maybe
Speaker 2: it looks like a cliff, but it's just a dip
Speaker 2: and you're not actually going to die, but you still
Speaker 2: The other interesting part of this metaphor that like really
Speaker 2: ties into reality is that in order to see the
Speaker 2: cliff at all, you have to be on the fringe
Speaker 2: of the herd. You can't be in the center of
Speaker 2: the herd. You have to be a fringe thinker fringe.
Speaker 2: You have to actually physically be on the fringe. I
Speaker 2: think that's just a fucking just a beautiful metaphor as
Speaker 2: to why.
Speaker 3: The fifteen percent actually is the answer.
Speaker 12: The physical aspect is one hundred percent true in the
Speaker 12: sense that you have to position yourself so that you're
Speaker 12: not in the center of the herd, and the herd
Speaker 12: can't see because they're saddled down with things that blind them.
Speaker 12: They're saddled down with debt, they're saddled down with a
Speaker 12: brutal nine to five. Maybe they're in a relationship and
Speaker 12: their spouse is also working, their kid is going to
Speaker 12: public school. Everybody in the family unit is just redlining it.
Speaker 12: At all times. You have no time to look up
Speaker 12: and muse about the direction of the world when you
Speaker 12: are worried about filling your car with gas and putting
Speaker 12: food on the table. So if you can position yourself
Speaker 12: in a way where you liberate yourself from those ties,
Speaker 12: then yeah, you can see it. But otherwise you are
Speaker 12: literally blinded because you don't have the extra resources yep,
Speaker 12: and to allocate towards seeing this sort of thing.
Speaker 2: This is just another I can't believe how great this
Speaker 2: metaphor is now that I'm thinking about it even deeper.
Speaker 2: It's like, in order to like, in order to be
Speaker 2: on the fringe, you have to be a risk taker inherently,
Speaker 2: because to be in the center of the herd when
Speaker 2: you're not running towards a cliff is actually the safest
Speaker 2: place to be because the predators can't get to you.
Speaker 2: They're gonna take all of the people on the fringes
Speaker 2: before they get to you. So the most cowardly people
Speaker 2: will inherently be in the center of that herd. But
Speaker 2: when there's an existential threat to the herd in its entirety,
Speaker 2: you're useless. In fact, you're dangerous because even the people
Speaker 2: in the front, the risk takers that are out there
Speaker 2: trying to to you know you're gonna push them lead
Speaker 2: you in the right direction. The person in the center
Speaker 2: of the pack ain't gonna see, ain't gonna be able
Speaker 2: to stop in time, and they're going to launch you.
Speaker 3: Off that cliff.
Speaker 2: So it's like, it's I can't believe how fucking great
Speaker 2: the herd towards a cliffman.
Speaker 12: You know who occupies those fringes, dangerous retards. That's who
Speaker 12: occupy the fringes, right, because your thoughts are deviating from
Speaker 12: the norm, and that's dangerous, and you're cast it out
Speaker 12: for those dangerous thoughts as a retard.
Speaker 3: Yep, bingo, unbelievable.
Speaker 12: Maybe we should bring it in for a landing here.
Speaker 12: I think that's a good spots wrap it up on.
Speaker 12: That was perfect.
Speaker 2: Thank you for tuning in to episode one of Dangerous
Speaker 2: rt RDS. Dangerous Retards. Please do like subscribe, leave a
Speaker 2: comment down below. We obviously theorized about a lot, so
Speaker 2: you'll probably disagree with a lot all get called a
Speaker 2: shill for saying that Jews don't control everything, whereas these
Speaker 2: guys will be you know, shout on for being anti Semites.
Speaker 2: And that's that's just the balance of power.
Speaker 9: That's it, baby, that's the name of the game.
Speaker 12: Also, guys, wherever you listen to this now, please consider
Speaker 12: going over to YouTube and rumble, finding the Dangerous rt
Speaker 12: r D accounts and subscribing there. We're gonna be streaming
Speaker 12: this on wherever we can until we build up those
Speaker 12: socials and then we're gonna start dumping all this content
Speaker 12: on there. So in order for us to dump it,
Speaker 12: there's got to be an audience there. So please go
Speaker 12: and find Dangerous rt r D apostrophe s wherever you
Speaker 12: can find your podcast and wait for us to start
Speaker 12: slapping it with content.
Speaker 9: That's right. Until next time, stay retarded, See you later, guys.
Speaker 3: Please welcome tune Liberty, lockdown.
Speaker 9: Please can give cod deliberty and come.
Speaker 3: But yeah, it's on hold. Where did it come from
Speaker 3: and where did it