Speaker 1: What's going on. Thank you so much for listening to
this podcast. It is heard live every day from noon
to three on WBT Radio in Charlotte. And if you
want exclusive content like invitations to events, the weekly live stream,
I daily show prep with all the links, become a patron,
go to dpeteclendershow dot com. Make sure you hit the
subscribe button. Get every episode for free right to your
smartphone or tablet. And again, thank you so much for
your support.
Speaker 2: We've been having a rather spirited discussion about the Gang
of six, for lack of a better phrase, different gang
of six than previous ones. But it's the Democrats who
took to video. I don't know. I think they're a
previous caller ernest at ask legitimate questions. Who encouraged these
six to make a video telling the US military to
disobey orders because they were illegally given. We're yeah, who
did it? You know? He called back to the fifty
one Intel officers that signed a letter. You know, these
these these folks are unhinged. They are mental, they are
you know, they don't want to debate issues, they don't
want to talk about facts. They just go out and
create things and don't want any repercussions. And again, what
I'm saying is going to presuppose some things that I
don't mean to, but it presupposes that they when they
were making this, because there had to be a discussion,
there had to be planning. What are we going to say?
How are we going to release it? We're all together?
Who said no? Ernest's question is who did they go to?
Others that said no, I'm not going that far? Did
you know what? What were the the plan? Who was
behind it? Did Mark Kelly say, hey, I'm going to
go to Slockin or did slock and go to Kelly?
And did the rest of them just glam on? We
don't know. There's so much. There's more that we don't know,
but it's been done. They put a video together telling
the military to disobey orders. That is in any other country,
that's an act of treason. In this country, it's it's
treason US. You can't go out and do that. You're
sitting member of commerce, you are an elected official, and
you're trying to get the US military to turn on
itself or turn on the commander in chief with no
by the way, with no proof, and when confronted on Sunday,
Slochan was given the opportunity to say, here's what I
think was illegal, and she had nothing she had to
her knowledge, there wasn't nothing illegal, even though she claimed
there was. There have to be consequences. There have to
be consequences for their actions. So I don't know where
that's going to go, but certainly it's this is the
beginning of that story, not the ends. And Mark Kelly
now being investigated by the Pentagon again, what and what
was it they hoped to achieved? Did they hope that
there would be a mass defiance of rank and file military?
Did they hope that there would be mass defiance from
officers in the military. Did they hope that the military
from the Pentagon and the DoD would stop and go
after the march on the White House? They just take
that to it's just logical, you know, And I'm not
blowing this out of proportion. They didn't say, you know,
just rank and file privates. They said military, which was
almost a call to arms against the executive brssion. Now,
as much as the political left makes say of January sixth,
which we learn more and more about every day, there
were two hundred and forty informants and FBI folks in
the crowd. There were there's a lot more questions there
that still need to be answered. But if you think
that was a riot, and you think that the US
government was threatened by January sixth, and you don't think
that sitting members of Congress essentially telling the military to
disobey orders is not problematic, then you're the one with
the problem, not the president. If you can't connect those
two dots, they're both they're both wrong. You don't use
in the military. By the way, the people who invaded
Congress that day weren't armed. They didn't have the people
in the military are. They have big dangerous things. If
you want to turn that on the American people, it
would be bad. Were they calling for the military to
go after the executive branch, that's an act of treason.
And I don't want to overstate that. I'm certainly not
trying to pander to people's fears or anything, but it's
a treason this act, and quite terrifying to me it is.
But we'll see how that all plays out, because I
think we're still in the beginning of that story, and
it may in it you know what. And I'll give
the other the other simpleton version of this too is
they were sitting around going, Wow, we really think this
presence out of bounds, this whole thing with Venezuela and
hitting those boats. That's terrible that we got to do something.
Has there been a due process? They can't reconcile that sending,
you know, things that kill three million Americans a year
or whatever is bad enough that we should stop them
and stop them before they get here, stop the enemy
before it arrives on our shores. And so they could
have easily had that debate about foreign policy. They could
have easily gone to Congress and said, hey, we need
to stop this military intervention in the drug trade. But
they didn't do that. They said defy orders. Very different,
But they could have. And it may be that they
just acted in ignorance, that these six Democrats were just
woefully ignorant of what they were doing and said, hey,
we'll put together a video because we're standing up for
the every man that doesn't want to kill drug dealers,
and you know, because we're better than drug dealers. So
and I'll give them that, I'll give them the benefit
of the doubt. But still it creates an active treason.
It doesn't mean that what they did was right. So
we'll see how that all plays out. Now, I do
I mentioned healthcare. Healthcare is not nearly as exciting, but
it affects all of us in some way, and we
often confuse. We often confuse health insurance for health care,
and they're vastly different things. Because you, if I were
to pull if I were to have a legitimate poll
of listeners to this station, we have left, right and
center that listen, and I were to ask you how
much does healthcare cost? I would think the overwhelming majority
of you would not know. You know what your insurance
cost are, you know what probably your deductibles are. You
know what your copay is for your drugs, your medications,
but you don't know what the actual cost of probably
any of it is. Now further, it gets more confusing.
Most of your doctors don't know what the cost of
healthcare is. Most of the people in doctors' offices don't
know what the cost of the services they deliver. I'd
give you a personal example when I had to have
a test run and there were two different well not tests.
They were going to do a procedure, and they said, oh,
well this is you can do this procedure which is
covered by insurance, or you can do it with a different,
more advanced way, but your insurance isn't going to cover
the more advanced way. And I said, okay, well, so
I'll just pay for the more advanced way. How much
is it? It took them four days to call me
back to tell me what the cost of the procedure was.
This was minor things and they couldn't so four days
later and it was like, I don't know, two three
hundred bucks and I was like, sure, let's go, and
no big deal. It took me longer to find out
the answer for the cost than the schedule and do
the procedure, which took like a day, and the procedure
took like that fifteen minutes. So that's the kind of
looney medical stuff that we've got going on, and I
want to get to The Paragrin Institute has a very
good piece about some of the discussion before the Senate
Finance Committee. I think most Americans would find interesting. It
can get a little in the weeds. I don't want
to get too far in the weeds, but I want
to I'm hopefully going to provoke thought with this. That
would be my goal is to provoke some thinking about this,
and so when on the other side of the break,
we will do that and also get to your calls
if you're interested at seven oh four five, seven eleven ten,
and we appreciate that. Also we'll talk a little bit
about the Ukraine, Russia stuff, the Nigeria stuff, and also
we will get to You're gonna love this nasal drops
for brain tumors. Also probably get to Donald Trump and
aliens toward the end of the broadcast, which I find fascinating.
Several stories circulating about that today.
Speaker 1: You know, stories are powerful. They help us make sense
of things, to understand experiences. Stories connect us to the
people of our past while transcending generations. They help us
process the meaning of life. And our stories are told
through images and videos. Preserve your stories with Creative Video
started in nineteen ninety seven and Minhill, North Carolina. It
was the first company to provide this valuable service, converting images,
photos and videos into high quality produced slideshows, videos and albums.
The trusted, talented and dedicated team at Creative Video will
go over all of the details with you to create
a perfect project. Satisfaction guaranteed. Drop them off in person
or mail them. They'll be ready in a week or two.
Memorial videos for your loved ones, videos for rehearsal, dinners, weddings, graduations, Christmas,
family vacations, birthdays, or just your family stories, all told
through images. That's what your photos and videos are. They
are your life told through the eyes of everyone around
you and all who came before you, and they will
tell others to come who you are. Visit creative video
dot com.
Speaker 2: Four pm today, the President is going to sign an
executive order. There's some press you know Houlla Blue about Yeah.
I don't know what it's going to be. There's obviously
a lot on the table right now, the Ukraine Russia situation.
The President's given the Ukrainians still I think Thursday to
have a deadline on. I think it's not a hard
and fast headline, but it. The President is also tweeted
out on his platform that on true social that he
it leads you to believe something's in the works now.
I don't know if there will be anything in the work,
So I don't know if it has anything, probably nothing
to do with four PM. Secretary of State Marco Rubio
has also indicated some and again, foreign policy is messy.
Foreign policy is difficult. You know, the surest sign that
a deal is going to be made is when both
sides are unhappy. But even Rubio has admitted that it
appears some progress is being made. This could be great
news for the planet and certainly for that area of
the world. As as we head towards the end of
twenty twenty five, it would be lovely to see something
like that happen. So just keep you on alert. Around
four pm today, you're probably gonna hear some news. I
don't know what it is. Maybe he's partying turkeys, I
don't know, but a lot of people are talking about it.
Perryon Institute put out some good information about healthcare that
I think is worth and again, the two most boring
subjects to me, and yet two of the most important
topics are certainly health care and climate. Why do I
say they're important to it because the threat to your rights,
the threat to you is real, even though it's boring,
because those two topics affect what you can do to live, thrive,
and survive. And you know, as much as people want
to say there's an affordability Congress. I'm sorry, an affordability crisis.
The truth is we have it's not a healthcare crisis.
It is a health care ignorance that we have in
this country, and it is widespread, and it has created
a system that is it's just broken. It's a broken system.
We have amazing doctors, we have amazing health care, but
it's become an untenable, difficult to understand system that I
believe is starting to create massive stress for people. So
it may it can solve some of the most complex,
difficult healthcare conundrums at the same time creating many others
because of the stress of navigating the system. I know
this because I try to navigate it week to week,
day to day, year to year, and it's not easy,
and understanding it is difficult. So what they're saying is,
you know, for tens of millions of Americans, neither healthcare
nor health coverage is affordable. And once we account for
the taxes and debt require of finance government health programs,
healthcare is not just unaffordable, it's a direct threat to
our fiscal future. Counterproductive government policies, and they are like
the affordable care it's not productive. Counterproductive have significantly contributed
to high and rising health care prices in spending, both
by inflating demand through excessive subsidies in other words, it's
encouraging people to go get a lot of stuff they
don't need done and subsidizing it and mandates, and by
restricting supply through regulations that protect incumbent insurers, that protect
hospital systems, and protect monopolies. These combined forces drive higher
prices and produce rampant inefficiencies. Because there is nothing efficient
about our healthcare in the way it's delivered, in the
way you get processed through the system. You realize very
quickly you're a number, you're a stat you are irrelevant
to the system. Again, those are my words, not the articles.
In many sectors of the economy, and listen to this.
This is an economic reality. Products and services have improved
in quality over time. Look at your phone, look at
the tech in your car, look at almost every aspect,
look at your TVs that you have. In almost every way,
products have improved in quality, while real prices, even accounting
for inflation, have declined. TVs are cheaper than they were,
TVs are larger, better, and cheaper than they were ten
years ago. Health care is a glaring exception. Rather than
delivering higher quality at lower prices, the hospital sector, now
the largest driver of US health spending, has delivered the opposite,
steeply rising prices, declining competition. And Dale Folwell, the former
treasurer of the state of North Carolina, to talk to
this all the time. He called our hospital systems in
North Carolina cartels, and they operate like cartels. They are
not focused on delivering a better quality service at a
lower price. Ever, and the government protects that through our
certificate of need process in North Carolina, along with a
thousand other decisions. Steeply rising prices, declining competition, and consolidation.
Again with our healthcare system, you've seen that in our hospitals.
That shields providers from market discipline. As the data show,
prices for hospital services, the largest component of health care,
has risen three times faster than inflation since the turn
of the century meeting of the test twenty five years.
No major industry in the entire nation has experienced faster
price escalation than hospitals. As healthcare costs have risen, insurance
premiums have soared at the same time, planned deductibles have
also risen. So, in other words, your deductible's gone sky
high and your cost has gone sky So you're getting
less bang for your buck every day. And what's the
Democrat's answer to hold the government hostage just to subsidize
it more. But back to the column. To understand why
costs have risen sharply, policymakers must and again trying to
deal with solutions. Policymakers must look beyond market forces and
recognize how federal policy, especially the Affordable Care Act, has
contributed to higher premiums, narrower networks, and reduced affordability. In
twenty twenty four, healthcare spending was eighteen percent of the
US gross domestic product, a thirty eight percent increase from
two thousand, when it was only thirteen percent of US GDP.
Are we delivering better outcomes? Are we delivering more efficient services?
Are we getting more bang for our button? No, it's
just risen. It's taking a larger and larger chunk of
our GDP. A significant part of that is waste. Most
estimates suggest up to a quarter of health care spending
provides people with little if any health benefit, Despite widespread
inefficiencies in the with health sector. There are pockets of excellence.
In the fast few decades, there have been meaningful advances
such as declining cardiac mortality, improvement and cancer survival rates,
a cure for Hepatitis C, and new AIDS treatments. Yet
health outcomes have stagnated. American life expectancy is lower in
twenty nineteen than it was in twenty thirteen before the ACA.
In other words, before the affair We're Care Act, we
were living longer, and by twenty nineteen, by the word
pre COVID were health care, we were declining. So I
don't want to get bogged down into too much of
this is a very complex article. Of point I'm making
is that the the government is inflating health care prices
because of tax and spending policies government healthcare. Government spending
on healthcare, including state and local spending is now forty
eight percent of US health care expenditures in twenty twenty three,
so half of all the dollars spend in healthcare. We're
by government, either state, local, or national. And you have
and I don't mean, I don't mean you you like
me accusing you, I include me and the u US.
We don't know what that gets us. There's no accountability
for how that money is spent, in what we're getting
for that money, and the Congress doesn't seem to care.
Republicans are Democrats alike, and at some point we really
need to get more government out of our healthcare system
because otherwise we're gonna end up like the national healthcare
system in Great Britain. It's gonna be broke, You're gonna
have people in the hallways. It's not gonna work, or
we have a bifurcated we kind of do. Now we
have a private healthcare system and a public one in
a way, and that's not going to be That's not
going to end well for us. When government subsidizes something,
that thing becomes more expensive every time. Think about that.
Speaker 1: Here's a great idea. How about making an escape to
a really special and secluded getaway in western North Carolina.
Just a quick drive up the mountain and Cabins of
Asheville is your connection. Whether you're celebrating an anniversary, a honeymoon,
maybe you want to plan a memorable proposal, or get
family and friends together for a big old reunion. Cabins
of Ashville has the ideal spot. For you where you
can reconnect with your loved ones and the things that
truly matter. Nestled within the breath taking fourteen thousand acres
of the Pisga National Forest, their cabins offer a serene
escape in the heart of the Blue Ridge Mountains. Centrally
located between Asheville and the entrance of the Great Smoky
Mountain National Park. It's the perfect balance of seclusion and
proximity to all the local attractions with hot tubs, fireplaces,
air conditioning, smart TVs, Wi Fi grills, outdoor tables and
your own private covered port which choose from thirteen cabins,
six cottages, two villas, and a great lodge with eleven
king sized bedrooms. Cabins of Ashville has the ideal spot
for you for any occasion, and they have pet friendly accommodations.
Call or text eight two eight, three six seven seventy
sixty eight or check out all there is to offer
at Cabins of Aashville dot com and make memories that'll
last a lifetime.
Speaker 2: A couple of things going on obviously a lot always.
That's what I love about talk radio. Things are happening
all the time. There is a four pm executive order
that's going to be released. Many people are speculating that
it's a designation that the Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization,
after several groups have stepped up warnings in recent month
that the group is gaining a foothold in the US.
It will be done in the strongest and most powerful terms.
Trump told just the News over the weekend. Final documents
are being drawn. Trump's comments come shortly after Texas declared
the Muslim Brotherhood of terrorist organization in just days after
the Institute the Study of Global Anti Semitism and Policy,
a prominent global research center, released a comprehensive two hundred
page study warning about its growing influence in the country.
So we'll see. He also is, you know, it's drawn
up documents about what's going on in Venezuela and going
after that group as as well. And you know what
they're trying to do there is they're closing the circle
on Maduro and trying to get him to resign. So
we'll see how that turns out. But certainly they're trying
to get the car. They've designated Cartel Dello Souls, which
is the other one, as a terrorist organization. In so
doing that that gives carte blanche to go after those
those two organizations. Those are huge designations. They have a
lot of foreign policy implications and domestic policy. So once
you determine that the Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization,
the activities within this country become under the purview of
Homeland Security and the FBI. There is no I do
not know the depths. I suspect that would be a
big deal. We will see. So the four PM deadline
not entirely sure what's going to happen there, but it
is significant and we will see how that shakes out.
So another thing that's going on is in Nigeria. The
situation there continues to deteriorate. From a Christian standpoint, it's
a shame that NBCCBS, ABC and others are ignoring this
massive story. More than three hundred children in staff have
been kidnapped by government from a Catholic school in central Nigeria,
making it one of the worst mass abductions the country
has seen. This is in addition to two hundred and
seventy six subducted during the Chickbox mass subduction of twenty fourteen.
It's literally a genocidal situation. That's happening over there, and
it's being targeted because of christian If you have Christian
beliefs or whatever. The targeting is against Christians there. I
don't know where that ends up. I don't know how
long it goes on, but that situation is something to
keep an eye on. It's not getting a lot of
press coverage out there. It's happening nonetheless. So four pm today,
it looks like it's going to be certainly against the
Muslim Brotherhood Executive Order. I don't know what that will
look like, but designating them a terrorist organization, the implications
are rather massive. So as we get toward the top
of the hour, I tend to move in toward scientific
and interesting kind of stories that I find interesting. One
of the other ones that's out there that is going
on is that again, it's hard to even make this jump,
but I'm going to do it anyway, because well I can.
The director. There's a new documentary out there about UFOs
called The Age of Disclosure. Now a lot of people
are speculating that a lot of the more recent UFO
spottings and things of this nature are drones. Certainly, drone
technologies come a long way and if you look at
the drones that you can get at Target or Walmart
or Costco or whatever, what you can do with a
small drone is amazing. But imagine the kind of tech
that the US military or any other kind of organization
might have with respect the drones and the speed and
how they operate, could could almost defy science in a way.
I don't know how advanced they are. We don't know,
but we have to assume with what you and I
can do that there must be far more advanced stuff
that's available. But there is a new documentary called Age
of Disclosure that is making strong suggestions about the government's
relationship with non human intel. And we know that the
US military has been engaged in dog fights with technology
it is far superior than our own that no country
on the planet has, with things that can defy the
laws of physics, can go underwater, above water. Can you
know have seen price seeing speeds and turns? And so
Dan Fair, the director of that film which does hit
you know it's in theaters. There are many suggestions now
again if this is either the yet another bigfoot sasquatch
lockness monster Taro dact spotted at the Mexican border story,
an absolute loon story, or it's the greatest story in
our lifetime. It's one of these two. But what they're
saying is, I think it's only a matter of time
before the release of the film is followed by a
sitting president, and they're suggesting Trump would step to the
podium and tell the world we're not alone in the universe.
It would be the most significant moment a leader could
possibly have that we aren't alone. The implications of that
would be massive. Pharaoh spoke to thirty four. He's the
director of this film thirty four US government insiders, including
those from the military and intel community, about an eighty
year global cover up of non human intelligent life. Roughly
that time frame is the Roswell incident in July third,
nineteen forty five. So it's going back to that when
the US military said, hey, we recovered a flying saucer
and then days later said no, we didn't and it
was a weather balloon, acting like they don't know what
a weather balloon is. But sources including Secretary of State
Marco Rubio, New York Democrats, Senator Christian Gillibrand, and former
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who I think has
no credibility, discusses the government's work with uf unidentified anomalist
phenomena UAPs, the formal term for UFOs. I don't know
why we have to have a politically correct phrase for UFOs.
You and I always, you know, the X files and
everything you grew up with UFOs. Now they're UAPs. But
I guess it's just another way to move things about.
Could be interesting, but several news organizations have suggested that
this president could now again it's either you know, another
long line of Oh, there's ghosts been spotted, the locknest, monsters,
there there, whatever, whatever, great you know pseudoscience story you
can find out there, or there's a legit thing that
will happen and it'll change the course of human history
in many ways. So that's issue one. Now. The second
one i'll get to after the break. I want to
get to one that actually is a true, absolute, one
hundred percent science story that I think is worthy of
of closer scrutiny. And what I do believe we at
the at the one one moment in human history when
the US is in the midst of horrific health care
inability to deal an efficient way with healthcare. We're on
the brink of so many amazing scientific discoveries. If you're
studying cancer and you're looking at car te therapies, if
you're looking at different genetic phenomenons that can be addressed
and re engineered. At the same time, you know these
horrific things about policy that are tying and gumming up
the works. We're seeing phenomenal advances in human care and
the ability to deal with things that here to four kills.
I guess we'll just die of different things. The more
we cure the things we typically die of and make
cancer a living condition, the more wild just die of
other things. You start curing heart disease, you start curing cancer,
you die of probably all the self inflicted things like
obesity and the other things we do to ourselves. Having
said that, do you want to get to this story
when we get to the other side of the break?
Fascinating tech?
Speaker 1: All right? If you're listening to this show, you know
I try to keep up with all sorts of current events,
and I know you do too. And you've probably heard
me say get your news from multiple sources. Why, Well,
because it's how you detect media bias, which is why
I've been so impressed with ground News. It's an app,
and it's a website, and it combines news from around
the world in one place so you can compare coverage
and verify information. You can check it out at check
dot ground, dot news slash pete. I put the link
in the podcast description too. I started using ground News
a few months ago and more recently chose to work
with them as an affiliate because it lets me see
clearly how stories get covered and by whom. The blind
spot feature shows you which stories get ignored by the
left and the right. See for yourself. Check dot ground,
dot news slash pete. Subscribe through that link and you'll
get fifteen percent off any subscription. I use the Vantage
plan to get unlimited access to every feature. Your subscription
then not only helps my podcast, but it also supports
ground News as they make the media landscape more and spiring.
Speaker 2: We have a lot to be grateful for. We all do.
In spite of any challenges and setbacks and things. There's
always an attitude of gratitude that can that can make
we just have to be that way. We really should
and for all of you out there with TDS look,
I'll be praying for you, man. I know it's tough,
and I do hope you get past your anger and
your hatred because there's some great things happening in this
nation and it's okay. It's okay to celebrate positive things.
It's like, whenever there's good environmental news, all my friends
that are global warming freaks, they almost can't stand it.
It's like, hey, we found out they're more polar bears
than we previously thought. Great news. They're like, oh no,
now everyone's got to think everything's fine. Well, we found
lots of more penguins. Penguins are doing pretty good. Ah,
be happy. Be happy. When there's good news. You should
take the victory lap. I mean, if you really wanted
to spend it, you could say, hey, our policies are working.
It's saving the polar bears. But they don't. The end
is near. It's all bad. Be thankful, be very thankful.
So this is a fascinating story about how we're moving
the possibility of moving ahead in medical technology could have
a significant opportunity to save more lives. And every day
I see these and this is from Washington University, their
education research researchers at Washington University School of Medicine and
Saint Louis, along with collaborators at Northwestern University, have developed
a non invasive approach to treat one of the most
aggressive and deadly brain cancers. Their technology uses precisely engineered
structures assembled from nanosized particles to deliver tumor fighting medicine
to the brain through nose drops. Nose drops. The novel
delivery method is less invasive than similar treatments in development
and was shown in mice to effectively treat gleoblastoma by
boosting the brain's immune response. So the short version of
an overly long story is that gleoblastoma the type of tumor,
and these are horrible tumors that killed Sendrick Kennedy, my
best friend's mother died of this type, and it was
remarkably fast from time of discovery to the untreatable couldn't
do anything about it. It is almost always fatal, and
your body's immune system never That's why immuno therapy doesn't
typically work on these because your body doesn't see it
as a problem. The body sees the tumor in the
brain and goes okay. It's part of the brain won't
attack it. So when you find something like this, and
I'm astounded at where nanotechnology can go for good and bad.
I mean, nanotechnology can be used for bad, but nanotech
can be the next great frontier in treating everything. Imagine
if in addition to carte therapies, when you can use
nanotechnology to target all bad things, train your body's immune
system to say, that's bad, we got to get rid
of it. Researchers their technology uses this to go after
the tumor. The findings were published earlier this month. The
tumors form from brain cells called astrocites and are the
most common kind of brain cancer, affecting three and one
hundred thousand people. It progresses very quickly, almost always fatal.
There is no curative treatment for the disease, partly because
delivering medicines to the brain is extremely challenging. And having
seen this personally my beloved at a horrific brain aneurysm,
I was amazed at the tech that was used to
save her life and see that through without even surgery,
of what they were able to do. And she's a
lottery winner, I mean, she really is in life to
have it treated with a platinum coil and a remarkable
procedure that didn't involve a surgical team but involved an interventionalists.
These the type of tech that was used. And she's
the five percent. You know, fifty percent of the people
that have her kind of aneurysm die and of those
of those that live, about ninety percent of them have long,
long term issues, incapacities, brain problems. She had none of that.
They were able to treat that and fully recovered, and
it's just miraculous, a lot to be thankful for all
the time. So watching that tech and watching the discussion
about that tech, you think about that, and all of
you probably know someone or know someone who knew someone
who had a glioblastoma. And that's just one of a
million different things that we're finding out there that might
be pretty remarkable. Also, one other story I'm going to
get to here is and I don't know that i'll
get to all of it, but I find it remarkable
because you can tell a lot about a leftist perspective
from the way they write from a guilt centric way
of looking at things. This is one about whether having
a dog is bad for global warming. If you own
a dog is bad for global warming. This guy is
one of those people that has a dog but buys
into all of the hyperbody about climate change. He says,
I've been a vegetarian for over a decade because of
my health, but because I disliked chicken or beef. It's
a lifestyle choice I made. I wanted to reduce my
impact on the planet. Yet twice a day I give
my dog kibble into a bowl and set it down
for my fifty pound rescue. Until recently, I hadn't devoted
a huge amount of thought to that paradox, until the
Associated Press said people miscalculate climate choices. One is owning
a dog. The study, led by the folks at the
PNAS and Nexus, examine how people perceive climate impact on
various behaviors options like adopt a vegan diet, shift from
fossil fuel to renewable public transport. The team found that
participants generally overestimated a number of low impact actions like
recycling and using efficient appliances, and vastly underestimated the impact
of other personal decisions like owning a dog. The real
objective of the study was to see whether certain types
of climate information could help people commit to more effective actions.
But hours after the article came out, its aim had
been recast as something entirely different and attack people who
had dogs. In other words, leftists saw this and attacked
people up for owning dogs. How dare you're destroying the planet.
Fellow researchers watched the reaction unfold. If I saw a
headline that said climate scientist wants to take your dog away,
I would get upset. They definitely don't. You can quote
me on that. The study set out to understand how
to shift behavior by communicating truths climate truths. Instead, it's
media coverage revealing a troubling psychological trade off. When climate
related messaging strikes a nerve, it may actually turn people
off from working on shifting societal norms. In an instinct,
this is again listen to the authors like trying to
come to terms with this. In an instinct, I understand,
I love my dog and my knee jerk reaction is
to defend the very personal choice of sharing one's life
with a dog. I also sympathize with redirecting the blame
toward the biggest polluters like billionaires and fossil fuel companies,
not my chihuahua or a dog, But it is irresponsible
to shrug off any kind about the impact of our pets,
something far more within our control than the overthrow of capitalism.
See what he says, the overthrow of capitalism will solve
climate change. Now the irony of that statement alone, when
the Chinese are bringing online dozens of coal fout fuel
plants and the Europeans are buying oil from Russia, acting
like getting rid of capitalism is going to make it better.
When we're the most efficient users of power on the planet.
We may use more of it, but we're better at
creating efficiencies. Is there a way to have a frank
discussion about climate change without going after our dogs? I
question how a particular climate behavior might fit into my life.
I try to imagine how it looks in my vision
of a sustainable future. It's why, for instance, I don't
own the car and am dedicated to writing public transit
even though it isn't convenient. I'm keen to be an
early adopter of systems I believe in, but I struggle
to imagine a future without companion animals. See how he's
going through this horrific Sophie's choice, keep my dog or
save the plant, and that's a horrific way to exist.
Dog and cats are meat eaters, which is where the
bulk of their carbon pallprint comes from. Twenty five to
thirty percent of the environment impact of meat consumption in
the US comes from dogs and cats. That's a year's
worth of driving by thirteen point six million cars. For pets,
they eat additional kibble over wet food. That protein may
come from meat byproducts, which makes it worse. After of
course they eat, they poop, At least for dogs, poop
typically gets bagged in plastic and sent to the landfill.
As it turns out, all the biodegradable poop bags they
also release greenhouse gases in landfills, so you can see
how they get trapped in this really circular, bad logic
instead of seeing a bigger, more robust, and more positive
picture about things. Owning a dog and a cat can
enricher life, and there's a lot of dogs and cats
that need to be saved.
Speaker 1: All right. That'll do it for this episode. Thank you
so much for listening. I could not do the show
without your support and the support of the businesses that
advertise on the podcast, so if you'd like, please support them. Too,
and tell them you heard it here. You can also
become a patron at my Patreon page or go to
dpetecleanershow dot com. Again, thank you so much for listening,
and don't break anything while I'm gone.