Speaker 1: You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
Speaker 1: KFI AM six from.
Speaker 2: O Kelly k if I AM six forty listening anytime
Speaker 2: on demand of the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 3: I once had a a uh oh.
Speaker 2: He's one of the programmers I worked with, and we
Speaker 2: were talking about you know, good days, bad days. Uh
Speaker 2: you know what happens when you go in the in
Speaker 2: the studio, but you had a bad day. Guys, you've
Speaker 2: all been there right where whatever's going on, whatever turmoil
Speaker 2: is going on. When you're in the studio, you have
Speaker 2: to put all that aside, right, I mean you kind
Speaker 2: of you have to lock in. And he used to say,
Speaker 2: as soon as you cracked that mic, it's showtime, baby,
Speaker 2: and I thought, that's so true.
Speaker 3: It's so true.
Speaker 4: I mean, yeah, absolutely, because I mean there's there. Well, honestly,
Speaker 4: I leave it at the door.
Speaker 3: That's good.
Speaker 4: You know, it sucks because it's like you have that
Speaker 4: whatever you're going through and then I get to the
Speaker 4: through those doors that's gone.
Speaker 2: For nets to pause. And I don't know about you,
Speaker 2: but I use that kind of as a coping mechanism.
Speaker 2: And my therapist says, you know, you compartmentalize and I said, yeah,
Speaker 2: that's that's how you that's how you do life.
Speaker 3: And he says, no, a.
Speaker 2: Lot of people will work through their emotions, like, well,
Speaker 2: I can't do that because I got to go in
Speaker 2: the air. I can't go on the air and work
Speaker 2: through my emotions. It's showtime, baby, showtime. I bring that
Speaker 2: up because I love doing I love talking about what's
Speaker 2: happening in the world of show biz.
Speaker 3: I wish I were better versed.
Speaker 2: It's one of the reasons I like working with you guys,
Speaker 2: because I know Mo is so well connected, and then
Speaker 2: by extension, you are as well and twelve. I've worked
Speaker 2: with you a number of times, even when Moe was
Speaker 2: doing weekends and I had the privilege of filling in,
Speaker 2: and of course Mark, Mark was the the last man
Speaker 2: on the Totem Pull and it got stuck with me
Speaker 2: on some Sunday shows. And you guys are just connected,
Speaker 2: you know what you're talking about. I love that, and
Speaker 2: so I love being able to talk about show business.
Speaker 2: I'd love to do more about the business of show
Speaker 2: business because I'm fascinated by all the other goings on.
Speaker 2: Right the fact I've got a story coming up here
Speaker 2: in the next segment. I got to share with you
Speaker 2: that we've got a major streamer that is getting rid
Speaker 2: of their ADS supported product because they have a new
Speaker 2: AD supported product. They have too many AD supported products
Speaker 2: to keep supporting AD supporting products.
Speaker 3: What a mess that is fascinated by that. We'll get
Speaker 3: to that in a second.
Speaker 2: But one of the things that we see in let's
Speaker 2: say publishing, is somebody likes to come up with a
Speaker 2: benchmark something that is massive. Time Magazine, Person of the Year, Right,
Speaker 2: there's something big, Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition. They want to
Speaker 2: have this big, splashy thing. It doesn't necessarily define who
Speaker 2: they are, but it doesn't violate the definition of their
Speaker 2: brand either.
Speaker 3: Sports Illustrated Magazine for.
Speaker 2: Guys who like sport and girls swimsuit edition.
Speaker 3: Right, Time Magazine.
Speaker 2: We were on top of all the most important things
Speaker 2: in Time, and boom, here is the highlight of the year.
Speaker 3: People Magazine.
Speaker 2: We have all the different we know all there is
Speaker 2: to know about the celebrities. We're big on the celebrities
Speaker 2: we know from top to bottom, and then we create
Speaker 2: a ranking system to make the celebrities who are already
Speaker 2: full of vanity even vaniteer Vanadier whatever. So Stephen Colbert
Speaker 2: is doing the Late Show last night. He dives into
Speaker 2: what People magazine has come up with as the sexiest
Speaker 2: man Alive.
Speaker 3: Maybe you saw, without.
Speaker 5: Further ado, Joe, A drum roll please, this year's People's
Speaker 5: Sexiest Man Alive is.
Speaker 6: John Krasinski.
Speaker 2: All right, well, all right, and then he goes on
Speaker 2: to make the same joke everybody he makes. I was
Speaker 2: a little this pointed because I like Colbert, but he said,
Speaker 2: oh I thought this was.
Speaker 3: Gonna be my year. Come on, that's the that's like
Speaker 3: the uh, it's like the token expression. You have to
Speaker 3: say it. My god, I know.
Speaker 2: It's like it's like a morning show from a bad
Speaker 2: CHR station in my hometown. Right Like that is entry
Speaker 2: level radio comedy. I thought it was my year.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, me too.
Speaker 2: The Jimbo and Bimbo Show will be right back, jim
Speaker 2: We thought you were gonna be this exsiest man Alive
Speaker 2: this year.
Speaker 3: God, I hate that crap.
Speaker 2: You actually sound like some of those crafty shows.
Speaker 3: A good imprisination of it. Listen.
Speaker 2: One thing that he drove me nuts because I used
Speaker 2: to do morning radio on music stations. I was never
Speaker 2: in very large market, so but I did you know,
Speaker 2: talk radio is where I had a little more success.
Speaker 2: But uh, I did have some female co hosts and
Speaker 2: I liked it. I just I hated that it was
Speaker 2: so easy to fall into. I always called it the
Speaker 2: jim Bo and Bimbo Show. I just hated that, and
Speaker 2: I always wanted to have a little bit more depth.
Speaker 2: And that's why we got questioned in the ratings, because,
Speaker 2: let's face it, people just wanted that. Yeah, here's a
Speaker 2: guy saying something crazy and then a giggle box. It
Speaker 2: reinforces his stupid humor. Yeah, I hate that crap so bad. Anyway,
Speaker 2: Emily Blunt, what does she have to say about her
Speaker 2: husband being named the Sexiest Man Alive?
Speaker 3: You think that's a turn on or turno off?
Speaker 7: John Krasinski's new title is that's from e News People
Speaker 7: magazine Sexiest Man Alive is not going to let him
Speaker 7: off easy at home. The forty five year old jokes
Speaker 7: that while his wife, Emily Blunt was very excited by
Speaker 7: the news, she isn't going to ease up on him.
Speaker 7: In fact, quite the opposite. The Office star tells people
Speaker 7: in the cover story quote, I think it's going to
Speaker 7: make me do more household yours. After this comes out,
Speaker 7: she'll be like, all right, that means you're going to
Speaker 7: really earn it.
Speaker 8: Here at home.
Speaker 3: What does that mean You're gonna earn what?
Speaker 7: However, the Mary Poppins return star, who shares daughters Hazel
Speaker 7: and Violet with John, also insists on some heavy ribbing,
Speaker 7: joking that she plans to wallpaper the house with his
Speaker 7: sexy new cover. John tells the bag quote, my children
Speaker 7: will love that.
Speaker 6: It won't be weird at all.
Speaker 7: The Quiet Place director and star says jokes aside, there
Speaker 7: was a lot of joy in sharing the news with
Speaker 7: his wife of fourteen years. As for the Jack Ryan
Speaker 7: Starrs initial reaction to the new title, He tells Stephen
Speaker 7: Colbert during the November twelfth episode of his Late Night
Speaker 7: show that when he learned the news, he thought he
Speaker 7: was the butt of a joke.
Speaker 2: Okay, all right, you get it. It's all light and
Speaker 2: fluffy and all that stuff. I do like when actors
Speaker 2: who I think are genuinely nice. I love John Krasinski
Speaker 2: and I love Emily Blunt, and I love that they're together.
Speaker 2: That's one of those Hollywood couples that I hope stays together. Forever,
Speaker 2: and I'll be devastated if they break up because I
Speaker 2: like them so much and so it makes me happy
Speaker 2: when people like that win these accolades.
Speaker 3: Great? Do that more love it?
Speaker 2: Do you suppose, though, that if you come home and
Speaker 2: tell your wife I just got named the sexiest man alive,
Speaker 2: do you think that's a turn on? Or do you
Speaker 2: think it's a turn off, because then it's like, oh,
Speaker 2: you think you're something now? Is there a is there
Speaker 2: an air of maybe he thinks he's better than me
Speaker 2: now other women are going to be oggling him. Or
Speaker 2: do you think it's a total sense of pride, like, Wow,
Speaker 2: I'm gonna be with the sexiest man alive. I've never
Speaker 2: been so proud of my husband, and and look what
Speaker 2: I you know, I'm with the sexiest man alife. If
Speaker 2: I were with the sexiest woman alife, which I am,
Speaker 2: of course my wife is, of course, I mean I
Speaker 2: would feel like I would feel like, uh, I got
Speaker 2: the best trophy.
Speaker 3: On my arm. Yeah, but this is Hollywood, Now, I'll Hollywood.
Speaker 9: You know, couples looking like that, it's almost like, you know,
Speaker 9: if you're if your husband or wife wins an Academy
Speaker 9: award and is thing in Hollywood and you're not, you know,
Speaker 9: just you're supportive and you're like, this is a part
Speaker 9: of it's winning Sexiest Woman Live or Sexist Man Alive.
Speaker 9: You know, you listen to anyone who's won it, and
Speaker 9: nothing changes at home.
Speaker 3: You know, they're not like I can't believe you want
Speaker 3: to know, they're just like, man, like this what you've
Speaker 3: been working for?
Speaker 2: I don't know, man, because but okay, do you think
Speaker 2: that there's fear that he's going to start looking somewhere
Speaker 2: else thinking he can do whatever he wants? And I'll
Speaker 2: tell you what, how many times have we seen people
Speaker 2: in Hollywood who have an equal relationship as far as
Speaker 2: their their career paths when they get together and then
Speaker 2: all of a sudden, one person's career takes off and
Speaker 2: then the other one is put out the pasture. You know,
Speaker 2: I'm thinking Jim Carrey like, oh, you know what I
Speaker 2: could be with Jenny McCarthy.
Speaker 3: So I guess bye, bye, honey, I'm with Jenny. Now. Yeah,
Speaker 3: that's just guys period. I mean you know that I
Speaker 3: don't think there's any insecurity on her part.
Speaker 9: No, No, I don't, because you got to think about
Speaker 9: guys who are married, who individuals that people think are
Speaker 9: the most beautiful women on the planet Earth. You know,
Speaker 9: Brady was married Toselle and there were allegations of infidelity.
Speaker 9: And it's like, but that's Gazelle, what are you doing?
Speaker 9: You know, It's like, guys are guys, And it's unfortunate
Speaker 9: that that being named sexiguest man alive if that's what
Speaker 9: makes him step out, you know. And and and I'm
Speaker 9: no partner, no, because she's also a star. She's also star.
Speaker 9: And she's also a mega star, you know, so it's
Speaker 9: not like she's some scrub. She's been probably in more
Speaker 9: feature films than him by now.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, you know, she's incredible. He needs this. He
Speaker 3: just keep up. He needs this. He needs a little shine.
Speaker 3: Otherwise she's gonna start thinking she can do better. Like like, hey,
Speaker 3: so are you ever going to be anything else? Why
Speaker 3: an't you gonna get your career off the ground here?
Speaker 2: I know you did the office, but that's been Maybe
Speaker 2: you start doing something else there, little Jack, Ryan, that's good.
Speaker 3: Okay, a little jack all right? I like that.
Speaker 2: All right, we'll talk about the ad supported service that
Speaker 2: had too many ads to support the service of the
Speaker 2: ad supported service.
Speaker 3: It turned very inception, very fast. That's next.
Speaker 1: You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
Speaker 1: KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2: Chris merrill In from O Kelly Listen anytime on demand
Speaker 2: of the iHeartRadio app. You're gonna want to check out
Speaker 2: tonight's program when you get a chance, mostly because uh
Speaker 2: Twalla made an a mission that nobody expected him to
Speaker 2: make in today's program. I can tell you that when
Speaker 2: we put the show together today, at no point that
Speaker 2: I expect that he would admit that he'd try cannibalism
Speaker 2: if given the opportunity. That was just weird man, And
Speaker 2: I just wonder how long he spent thinking about that
Speaker 2: before the words came out of his mouth.
Speaker 3: Okay, fascinating.
Speaker 9: Look, look be clear, I said, you don't know what
Speaker 9: your eating at any given time. At any given time,
Speaker 9: and I don't believe that everything we're eating is beef.
Speaker 9: We don't know where these bodies are going. We don't
Speaker 9: know what's being buried, we don't We don't know where
Speaker 9: these horses are going at the race track. We don't
Speaker 9: know where the people are going in Forest Lawn. We
Speaker 9: don't know. But we still have our behinds in the
Speaker 9: drive through nightly got all able. We got to get
Speaker 9: a burger. I gotta run and get some Taco Bell.
Speaker 9: I gotta go and get some done.
Speaker 3: You don't know what you're eating.
Speaker 9: Silent breed is paper.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's what you're eating.
Speaker 9: I'm to say if you can tell me for a
Speaker 9: fact that you know what you're eating.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm looking at you like you're crazy.
Speaker 2: All of a sudden, that pink slime that the Taco
Speaker 2: Bell had a problem with a few years back, that sounds.
Speaker 3: Really good right now? You remember that? Of course? Do
Speaker 3: you know why I remember that? This is so funny.
Speaker 2: I remember that because we got a memo saying don't
Speaker 2: talk about it on the air.
Speaker 3: Do you remember that?
Speaker 10: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, yeah yeah.
Speaker 2: They said, you know, listen, Taco Bell doesn't want us
Speaker 2: talking about this. News can talk about it, but Taco
Speaker 2: Bell is an advertiser. Don't talk about it on the air. Yeah,
Speaker 2: And now I can't forget it. Yeah, although I think
Speaker 2: it just violated that memo.
Speaker 9: But isn't it past the statute on that Yeah, statute
Speaker 9: of limitations on memo of that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, definitely, yeah, Yeah, that's what it is.
Speaker 10: Uh.
Speaker 2: Imagine if you run a company and you acquire another company,
Speaker 2: and then all of a sudden, you in your acquisition
Speaker 2: decide that the company you just acquired does it better
Speaker 2: than you've been doing it, and so you start doing
Speaker 2: it the way the company that you acquired does it,
Speaker 2: and then you are redundant and you don't need the
Speaker 2: company that you acquired any longer. I know it's weird, right,
Speaker 2: It sounds like inception. It's a dream within a dream.
Speaker 2: That's what's happening with Amazon.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 2: From the award winning cord Cutter News. You're going to
Speaker 2: hear the professionalism in this broadcast right here, which was
Speaker 2: found exclusively on the internet.
Speaker 5: Welcome back to the Corcars News Tech Lab. We've got
Speaker 5: some breaking news that just broke this afternoon.
Speaker 3: See Rodner, Are you paying attention? That's how you write
Speaker 3: a story.
Speaker 4: Thank you for that. No, I was actually busy writing
Speaker 4: a story. No, listen, this is just good writing at lab.
Speaker 6: We've got some breaking news that just broke.
Speaker 2: That's how you know it's breaking news, Roder, because it
Speaker 2: just broke. Of course, bingo, what do you get when
Speaker 2: you work your fingers to the bone. By the way,
Speaker 2: bony fingers, thank you very much.
Speaker 5: Yep, Amazon, preev is shutting down. It's the free AD
Speaker 5: supported streaming service from Amazon. Oh no, probably heard this
Speaker 5: before because this was reported earlier this year from Adweek.
Speaker 2: So I love that it's breaking news that you probably
Speaker 2: heard earlier this year.
Speaker 3: That is just amazing. Yeah, they're shutting down FREEV. I
Speaker 3: like FREEV.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, I just watched all of Hell on Wheels
Speaker 4: on FREEV.
Speaker 3: Freev's great. Do you know what I think they're doing here?
Speaker 2: I think free V, which was an AD supported streaming
Speaker 2: service like tob right isn't to be an AD supported
Speaker 2: streaming service, but freebe was all movies.
Speaker 4: No, FREEB was a little bit of everything. Okay, it
Speaker 4: was pretty similar to to B.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Yeah, donate on Tube. That's Mark's bread and butter. Don't
Speaker 4: you dare nothing.
Speaker 2: Wrong with tub? I got nothing wrong. I love to
Speaker 2: Be's new ads. By the way, have you heard their
Speaker 2: new ads?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 2: That are like I don't remember the specifics, but it'll
Speaker 2: be like uh uh, Toob is there.
Speaker 3: If you're a little old lady who had her.
Speaker 2: Wallet stolen from an evil mugger, Tooby's got you covered.
Speaker 2: We won't charge you anything, and if you're a mugger
Speaker 2: who just stole a little old lady's last dollar, to
Speaker 2: be's free for you too, because two be's free for everyone.
Speaker 3: It's great.
Speaker 4: I love that that had some genius marketing, right, I
Speaker 4: love it. Yeah, it's it's fantastic. It's pretty smart because
Speaker 4: I was like, where are they going with this? But right, oh,
Speaker 4: there it is. That's good.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm like, how are you going to know if
Speaker 2: it's an old lady who just got mug that you're
Speaker 2: gonna get free to all?
Speaker 3: I get at. Yeah, it was good.
Speaker 6: I like that said I had heard it was going
Speaker 6: to happen.
Speaker 2: Okay, so ad we heard that freeb was going away
Speaker 2: from Amazon Prime?
Speaker 3: Why?
Speaker 6: They said probably in the summer.
Speaker 5: They weren't too far off because come fall, Amazon made
Speaker 5: it official and is shutting down.
Speaker 2: All right, So thank you very much to the cord
Speaker 2: Cut of News for telling us how seasons work.
Speaker 5: We got all the details about this, including where is
Speaker 5: this content going, how are you going to still be
Speaker 5: able to access it? And what does this mean for
Speaker 5: the future of the Amazon free v exclusive content.
Speaker 3: I mean, the way he enunciates is just top notch too.
Speaker 6: We'll tell you all that in a quick second.
Speaker 3: Okay, oh any quick sit? That felt like a tease.
Speaker 5: I do have a story about this. We're at corecardsnews
Speaker 5: dot com. If you want to read about it, I'll
Speaker 5: pull link to it in the first pin comment.
Speaker 3: But wait a minute, I thought you were telling us
Speaker 3: about it.
Speaker 5: Pull link to it in the first pin comment and
Speaker 5: the show notes down below. If you like what we
Speaker 5: do here, please consider hinnight subscribe bun hinnut thumbs up.
Speaker 3: We're going to do? What do the subscribe button?
Speaker 5: Hinnut thumb we're hinde. Please consider hinnight subscribe bun flush.
Speaker 3: Is that how the young kins talk? Like out of touch? Here?
Speaker 3: Is this guy just bad at heat works? Well?
Speaker 4: I think he's trying to make it like a younger
Speaker 4: thing the way he's saying it, because the kids are
Speaker 4: always smashed that like button or that's a subscribe button.
Speaker 4: But he's trying to like cool with it, like hidden it, hidden.
Speaker 6: It, Hey night, subscribe hitting it.
Speaker 3: You can help us out by hidden it.
Speaker 5: Please consider hynight subscribe bunnnut thumbs up, hidden it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, see the first one. I give him the first
Speaker 4: one because maybe he was just talking too fast. He
Speaker 4: said it the same way the second time. That's how
Speaker 4: he says hitting it instinctually. Yeah, hidden, hidden.
Speaker 5: Head, please consider hey night subscribe bunn Nut thumbs up,
Speaker 5: Hidden doing one or balls YouTube know you enjoy what
Speaker 5: we do here, So YouTube recommends our video some more people.
Speaker 3: Yeah, no, I'm not gonna do that.
Speaker 2: Uh No, I think I handed it potted and a
Speaker 2: pen in it is what he's put.
Speaker 3: His comments below.
Speaker 2: What Uh so, here's the deal though, Why does Amazon
Speaker 2: Prime need an ad supported uh free V when Amazon
Speaker 2: Prime is now AD supported and they're charging so I
Speaker 2: think they're going to maintain They're going to keep all
Speaker 2: of the content that freeb had access to, but they
Speaker 2: don't need to give it away for free. They must
Speaker 2: have done some math on this roder. You got Prime
Speaker 2: or were you just stealing FREEV?
Speaker 3: No? No, you're watching it.
Speaker 4: I mean, okay, how else is Jeff Bezos going to
Speaker 4: afford his massive yachts I have to subscribe to Prime?
Speaker 3: Well?
Speaker 2: Yeah, especially when he keeps screwing up his newspaper investment.
Speaker 3: Yeah, how can I not support all that? Right? You
Speaker 3: have me? Yeah, look at that disaster.
Speaker 4: I think we were also working our way through the
Speaker 4: Rockford Files on freev too.
Speaker 3: They had a lot of good stuff on there. That's good.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, my neighbor lady used to watch the rock
Speaker 3: I love that. Yeah, it's not just good on its own.
Speaker 4: It's good if you like old La, because you get
Speaker 4: to see La in the early seventies before it's so cool.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's really good. I love that show. James Garner
Speaker 2: had attitude. That guy pulled it off, all right. One
Speaker 2: of the things that is breaking through and I'm gonna
Speaker 2: call twenty twenty four. They were one of the biggest
Speaker 2: success stories of twenty twenty four, not the politicians, but
Speaker 2: the people who made the politicians real life podcasters. The
Speaker 2: world of politics has changed forever because we are forever
Speaker 2: stuck with podcasters.
Speaker 3: That's next.
Speaker 1: You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
Speaker 1: KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2: Hi, It's Chris Merril caf I AM six forty. I'm
Speaker 2: from O'Kelly. Listen anytime on to Man and the iHeartRadio app. God,
Speaker 2: I should have been a singer. You guys hear that
Speaker 2: nailed it?
Speaker 3: Man? Yeah, foush, I hope you had that.
Speaker 2: You're running tape on this right, nie sure an perfect,
Speaker 2: All right, just take what I did, just rip it,
Speaker 2: send it off, publish that. We'll make a good jillion dollars.
Speaker 2: That's platinum. It felt platinum to me. Yeah, like a DJ.
Speaker 4: Just take the the lyrics out and just put a
Speaker 4: beat to it. Right, Yeah, let's it. You have to
Speaker 4: sample it, you can do that. Just do that in
Speaker 4: the next commercial break. All right, throw it together. Sounds good.
Speaker 2: See if you can get mister worldwide open for my
Speaker 2: next tour exactly, let's see, we'll work roll.
Speaker 3: Uh oh, you know what.
Speaker 2: This election, there's a lot of debate about Trump and
Speaker 2: Harris and where they were spending their time making their
Speaker 2: media appearances. I was reading an article in Variety, and
Speaker 2: I don't know if if you guys happen to see this,
Speaker 2: but it talked about Joe Rogan and the Fifth Estate,
Speaker 2: how the podcaster and a group of cable news exiles
Speaker 2: became more powerful than traditional media. So it goes on
Speaker 2: to talk about the podcasters and how Trump really reached
Speaker 2: people because he understood the importance of Joe Rogan, whereas
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris didn't. And Kamala Harris was invited to be
Speaker 2: on Rogan's show, but instead she was on Saturday Night
Speaker 2: Live Loser, And I think Variety misses something here. I
Speaker 2: think it's it's a post mortem where you try to
Speaker 2: create a narrative using and then you cherry pick evidence.
Speaker 2: So in fact they what they go on to say,
Speaker 2: uh in the article is let me see, let me
Speaker 2: find it the part about the snl Yeah. Here it
Speaker 2: is us Harris's campaign decision to snub the Joe Rogan
Speaker 2: Experience podcast.
Speaker 3: They turned it down because she was too busy.
Speaker 2: This according to Andrew Yang, a CNN commentator, and also
Speaker 2: Andrew Yang. Instead of Trump's excuse me, Instead, Trump hit
Speaker 2: Rogan's Austin, Texas studio in the final days of the campaign,
Speaker 2: racking up a massive audience on YouTube.
Speaker 3: Alone forty eight million views.
Speaker 2: On a night when Harris could have fielded easy questions
Speaker 2: about some of Rogan's favorite topics, from the benefits of
Speaker 2: psychedelics to the existence of extraterrestrial life, she chose to
Speaker 2: make a surprise Saturday Live visit for a ninety second cameo. Yeah,
Speaker 2: but I saw that all over the socials. News was
Speaker 2: writing about that. News is writing about the Joe Rogan Experience.
Speaker 3: Too.
Speaker 2: But Trump was supposed to do an hour with Joe Rogan,
Speaker 2: and Brogan give him three hours. Would he have given
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris three hours?
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 2: My understanding was as well that Rogan said he didn't
Speaker 2: want to talk politics with Kamala Harris. He wanted to
Speaker 2: get to know her, but he didn't want to talk politics.
Speaker 2: Wait a minute, Goose, Gander, gander, goose, how's that working out?
Speaker 2: Do you get to say, I'm I'm gonna direct, I'm
Speaker 2: gonna allow for one candidate to talk about their policy,
Speaker 2: but I'm gonna tell the other candidate they're not allowed to.
Speaker 2: Doesn't that seem a bit bizarre? I also happen to
Speaker 2: think about something that Okay, I'm gonna crucify for this,
Speaker 2: not literally crucified, because that would be painful and I
Speaker 2: would cry. Is it time that we take a good
Speaker 2: hard look at applying some of the same rules that
Speaker 2: we have in legacy media to new media, for instance?
Speaker 2: And I know I know what the difference is. Look,
Speaker 2: I've been in the business long enough, I get it.
Speaker 2: I know that we are that we are licensed by
Speaker 2: the FCC. I know that we have to play by
Speaker 2: certain broadcast rules because of the spectrum that we operate under.
Speaker 2: But I just kind of wonder, forget the FCC, Maybe
Speaker 2: this is a Federal Elections Commission situation. If you've got
Speaker 2: Joe Rogan hitting forty eight million people and he doesn't
Speaker 2: have to play by equal time rules, why is it
Speaker 2: that a radio station in Perughkeepsie that has an average
Speaker 2: listener listenership of twenty five hundred has to play by
Speaker 2: these these equal time I was gonna call it, Marcaine.
Speaker 3: They really aren't.
Speaker 2: They're not bad, these equal time rules. See, I'm fine
Speaker 2: with equal time. I know a lot of people don't
Speaker 2: like it because they've positioned their entire radio program as
Speaker 2: either a showcase for the left or a showcase for
Speaker 2: the right, and they don't want to offer equal time.
Speaker 2: Or a radio station's entire brand is we are a
Speaker 2: showcase for the right or a showcase for the left,
Speaker 2: and they don't want to offer equal time. But the
Speaker 2: way it works in broadcast is that if I have
Speaker 2: Trump on this show, and Harris calls and says, hey,
Speaker 2: I heard Jed Trump on, I'd like equal time. I
Speaker 2: have to offer equal time, not necessarily on the same show,
Speaker 2: but it has to be on the same station, and
Speaker 2: it has to be in a day part with an
Speaker 2: equivalent audience size.
Speaker 3: That's the rules.
Speaker 2: But Joe Rogan can pick and choose, and he can say,
Speaker 2: I'm a podcaster.
Speaker 3: I don't have to play by those rules.
Speaker 2: And yet doesn't that then mean that you've got a
Speaker 2: major media influencer who is tipping the scales for a
Speaker 2: political candidate of one party or the other. I'm so
Speaker 2: frustrated with the with the divisiveness in our country that
Speaker 2: maybe I'm looking to cast blame. I just don't know
Speaker 2: that it's beneficial that we have become such a a
Speaker 2: micro targeted genre society. Does that make sense where our
Speaker 2: brands are all right or all left? Or we've got
Speaker 2: a podcaster has a tremendous influence and they just up
Speaker 2: and decide who they want to win. Or you've got
Speaker 2: a satellite radio company where you've got Howard Stern who's
Speaker 2: gonna interview Harris but he won't have Trump on again. Well,
Speaker 2: he doesn't have to play by the same rules as
Speaker 2: everybody else because he's not he's not govern by the FCC.
Speaker 2: I mean, he had Trump on a long time ago.
Speaker 2: But doesn't it seem bizarre to you. Maybe it's just
Speaker 2: sour grapes, Maybe it's just feeling like there's something unfair
Speaker 2: going on, but I gotta believe it. It's not beneficial
Speaker 2: to the country that we have rules in place in
Speaker 2: order to ensure equal access to potential voters when it
Speaker 2: comes to broadcast licenses, but we don't ensure equal access
Speaker 2: when it comes to even more.
Speaker 3: Popular media figures.
Speaker 2: Because, let's be honest, forty eight million people ain't here
Speaker 2: in this show tonight. There was something else going on
Speaker 2: in Capitol Hill today. Forget about politics. There was something
Speaker 2: even more important that was going on in Capitol Hill.
Speaker 2: And it's bipartisan and they're about to really screw up
Speaker 2: society all by letting the cat out of the bag.
Speaker 1: That is next you're listening to Later with Moe Kelly
Speaker 1: on demand from KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 3: Ok I AM six forty right after the mokel Show.
Speaker 2: As always, the Great George Norian Coast and Coast George,
Speaker 2: Big day for you.
Speaker 3: Congress was right up your ally.
Speaker 8: Today they're doing that thing. We'll be talking about that
Speaker 8: for a little bit tonight, Chris. One day we'll get
Speaker 8: the answers I hold and for the rest of the show,
Speaker 8: artificial intelligence will at play havoc with our financial self
Speaker 8: and later on hunting for Bigfoot on Coast to Coast.
Speaker 3: Always a great lineup.
Speaker 2: Looking forward to it, George, Thank you so much, my friend,
Speaker 2: looking forward to it.
Speaker 3: I was listening to George my way home. Love it.
Speaker 3: Great way to wrap up my evening.
Speaker 2: So here's one of the things that I wanted to touch
Speaker 2: on this going into Georgie's show. So the house did
Speaker 2: this hearing on UFOs today and they had some pretty
Speaker 2: recognizable people in there, and George is going to dive
Speaker 2: deeper into it obviously during Coast to Coast, but they're
Speaker 2: basically saying there's a massive cover up going on.
Speaker 11: NASA has whole archives of data, much of which I
Speaker 11: believe will likely have information that will help inform UAP.
Speaker 11: We need only look and again in an error with AIML,
Speaker 11: we can relatively quickly and easily go through it. So
Speaker 11: I think it's something that we should encourage an asset
Speaker 11: to do.
Speaker 12: Because is a presentation from the UATP Task Force. This
Speaker 12: is completely absurd. It's nuts, this level of censorship of
Speaker 12: redaction on a document. It shows the redaction of how
Speaker 12: many reports they've collected for how many years? Two of
Speaker 12: the three potential explanations are blacked out the Pentagon.
Speaker 2: Yeah, why do you think they're blacked out? I mean, actually,
Speaker 2: in this case, kind of blacking that stuff out allows
Speaker 2: your brain to go crazy. Doesn't it like they're blacking
Speaker 2: something out. They're not saying it's aliens, which means they
Speaker 2: must have blacked out that it's aliens. Right, But it's
Speaker 2: kind of where you it's kind of where you go
Speaker 2: with it, all right, So back to it.
Speaker 12: The intelligence community is treating us like children. It's time
Speaker 12: for us to know the truth about this. I think
Speaker 12: that we can handle.
Speaker 2: No, we cannot. Just to be very clear, no we cannot.
Speaker 2: How's the government? No, we we would panic. Did you
Speaker 2: guys ever see Mars attacks? Of course it would panic.
Speaker 3: That would be it. That would pretty much be what
Speaker 3: would happened. I think. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Look, even even maybe one of the more uh tame
Speaker 2: alien movies signs everybody freaked out, right, it's just total
Speaker 2: freak out times.
Speaker 13: Has the government conducted secret UAP crash rechieval programs?
Speaker 4: Yes?
Speaker 3: Or no? Yes?
Speaker 2: Okay u A P for those I'm famili I think
Speaker 2: most people know now that it is the unidentified anomalous
Speaker 2: phenomena phenomena.
Speaker 3: Yeah, thanks, oh, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
Speaker 2: The unidentified anomalists phenomena.
Speaker 3: Okay, all right, I get it. Thanks, yeah, phenomena. You're
Speaker 3: gonna love this. Guards all right, thank you very much,
Speaker 3: appreciate it.
Speaker 2: So they want to get to the the unidentified anomalous phenomena,
Speaker 2: which is like UFOs, but they wanted to expand it
Speaker 2: a little bit further. So that because now we've got
Speaker 2: unidentified underwater phenomena and other things. Okay, so what else?
Speaker 2: She gave a big yes or no? Do you have evidence?
Speaker 2: Yes or no?
Speaker 13: The government conducted secret UAP crash retrieval programs?
Speaker 3: Yes or no?
Speaker 2: Yes, And she's doing the old trick where it's like
Speaker 2: you have to answer the question yes or no. In
Speaker 2: other words, I'm not going to allow any context in
Speaker 2: my question. Have they done secret UAP retrieval things?
Speaker 3: Yes or no? Yes?
Speaker 2: In other words, we saw something, we didn't know what
Speaker 2: it was. We sent the military out to go get
Speaker 2: it because we didn't know what it was. All right,
Speaker 2: have you done secret UAP retrieval projects? Yes or no?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 2: Now, how do we take that we obviously they're going
Speaker 2: after a spaceship.
Speaker 8: No.
Speaker 2: I you see something in the air and you know
Speaker 2: that it lands somewhere, and you're gonna go figure out
Speaker 2: what that is is. That would be a but you
Speaker 2: don't want to tell anybody that you're after it. That
Speaker 2: would be a secret UAP of retrieval project. Kind of
Speaker 2: like if a Chinese weather balloon happens to fly over
Speaker 2: Montana and somebody shoots it down, you gotta go pick
Speaker 2: it up.
Speaker 3: Okay.
Speaker 13: Were they designed to identify and reverse engineer alien craft?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 10: Or no? Yes?
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm not so sure about that.
Speaker 13: In your book, you mentioned government employees who've been injured
Speaker 13: by UAPs placed on leave and receiving government compensation for
Speaker 13: their injuries.
Speaker 3: Is that correct? That is correct. I feel like he's
Speaker 3: kind of given away classified information here.
Speaker 13: How can the government deny we have recovered craft if
Speaker 13: they're paying people because they've been injured by recovered craft.
Speaker 2: Again, she's jumping to the conclusion that all UAPs are
Speaker 2: recovered alien spacecraft.
Speaker 3: I'm not ready to buy that yet, ma'am. That's a
Speaker 3: great question. That's why I think we're here again.
Speaker 10: I really believe that we should use this hearing to
Speaker 10: as a catalyst to improve in bolster our air defense capabilities,
Speaker 10: in our maritime awayne demandness capability, because obviously they're holes.
Speaker 2: In it, and now we're getting into the whole all
Speaker 2: UAPs are threats or could we even take the risk
Speaker 2: that they're not, whether it be.
Speaker 10: UAP of non Hi direction or Nhi direction or like
Speaker 10: as you say, sir China or any other adversaries.
Speaker 2: So that was the interesting part he's had. At one
Speaker 2: point during this this entire conversation conversation with these these witnesses,
Speaker 2: and many of them were pretty respectable individuals, they talked
Speaker 2: about the UAPs being spotted in large numbers around nuclear
Speaker 2: sites or military installations, and these witnesses of course said, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: it's happening.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: They said, could it be Chinese or Russian aircraft? Well, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: of course it could be. Meanwhile, the next person says,
Speaker 2: could it be aliens? Well, yeah, yeah, it could be aliens.
Speaker 2: But at this point they're just they're loving the spotlight
Speaker 2: is what's happening, and the politicians are loving that we're
Speaker 2: talking about it. But if it's a national security threat
Speaker 2: is a major concern. If we've got Russia or China
Speaker 2: spying on us. Now, maybe that's just so that they
Speaker 2: can grow their own intelligence. Maybe they have nefarious plans
Speaker 2: for the future. But actually we can we can comprehend that.
Speaker 2: If it is, say, something extraterrestrial or ethereal, even yeah,
Speaker 2: we can't handle that. We would go into absolute meltdown.
Speaker 2: That would be it just raining cats and dogs. Now
Speaker 2: forget it all over at that point, couldn't handle it.
Speaker 4: And not too done the severity of it. But that
Speaker 4: interviewer should have been the one to interview the new
Speaker 4: CEO at Red Lobster.
Speaker 2: Oh my gosh, you're right good callback Yeah, And then
Speaker 2: he would he would have given her all kinds of
Speaker 2: really great buzzwords on everything we see. I think I've
Speaker 2: hold on. Where's my Red Lobster cut? I closed it here,
Speaker 2: I've got it.
Speaker 3: He's got the What are you gonna do for Red Lobster?
Speaker 3: He's like, ah, we're gonna energize it.
Speaker 6: Is it relevant compelling? Yeah and exciting?
Speaker 3: Yes or no? We'll Redlabster be relevant, compelling and exciting,
Speaker 3: Yes or no?
Speaker 6: Relevant, compelling and exciting.
Speaker 2: It's good enough. What are the aliens? Aliens are relevant? Compelling, exciting,
Speaker 2: just like tomorrow show promises to be. Can't wait to
Speaker 2: see you then, Mark Ronerd, love you man. Twala couldn't
Speaker 2: have done it without you. Foosh, you keep me laughing
Speaker 2: all night. Thanks guys, appreciate it. Chris Marriland from O
Speaker 2: Kelly kf I AM six forty. We live everywhere in
Speaker 2: the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1: If there's news, if things shift, if they stay the same,
Speaker 1: things change.
Speaker 3: For better or worse.
Speaker 1: Regardless of what's happening, you're going to hear in here.
Speaker 3: It's what we do.
Speaker 6: Kf I M KOSG HD two
Speaker 7: Los Angeles, Orange County Lot everywhere on the eart radio