Speaker 1: Welcome back. Another episode of our interesting times. Is my pleasure.
I have Pete ken Is back on the show. Pete,
how you doing doing good?
Speaker 2: What's happening?
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, thanks for coming back on the show. Well,
lots happened since we talked. I guess, of course we
have the election discussed, and the cabinet selections and all
the controversies and stirm and drying and drama revolving that
what it what it uh? What it pretends? What we
can tell reading the tea leaves what's what? What does
Trump two point zero offer of the nation. But before
we get into that, there was this incident last week
in Amsterdam with the Jewish soccer hooligans. Did you follow
that story at all? Yeah?
Speaker 2: Yeah, Apparently apparently soccer violence is uh is anti semitec Now, yes,
I thought soccer violence over there was like, you know,
as much of a ritual as like getting drunk in
the parking lot of the of the walmart here and
when you're seventeen or eighteen years old and throwing up
in front of a cop.
Speaker 1: Well, apparently what happened. Some suggest that this is like
a Basad operation, This is a scio. Obviously the stoking
or provoking an incident and calling it a program. Yeah,
I read a news article mentioned that apparently some of
the disturbances was in the vicinity of Anne Frank's home.
Speaker 2: What they should have ran and hidden an attic.
Speaker 1: Well, if you're in Amsterdam, you're in the vicinity of anything.
It's a small place and what that means. But yeah, yeah,
in the attic. No one died of typhus though. But apparently, yeah,
this Maccabee Tel Aviv. I guess that's a soccer club,
football club they called football soccer in Israel. I don't know.
Speaker 2: I would hope football. I don't know that. I don't
think they have American football there. Okay, that would be
there'd be a lot of fectioning going on about the violence.
Speaker 1: So but the so, I guess for the purposes of compas,
this were called soccer. Uh uh. So apparently there was
a match between mac and B Tel Aviv. And was
it a local club there? I guess as part of
the international Yeah.
Speaker 2: Oh, but I forget, I forget how it's pronounced, but
I think it looks like axel or axis or something
like that. I heard axis.
Speaker 1: Well, apparently they went to the there was a moment
of silence for the flood victims in Spain, and that
macn Be Tel Aviv fans wouldn't cooperate with the moment
of silence. I think this is because Spain apparently imposed
arms and bargo on Israel. What if I recall, so
it's just their way, I guess. Of Then they started
chanting provocative chance like f Palestinians, IDF wll F the Palaestins,
because this is coming off the reports of raping and
torture going on by Palestines being custody by the Israelis.
Of course, this is occurring during the Israeli ethnic cleansing
operation Gaza and also their military operations in Lebanon. So
some people think this was an attempt to distract world
opinion from the genocide or ethnic cleansing in Gaza and
focus on the yet another story of Jews being victimized
in Europe. And then that's why the I think the
Israeli President Herzog called it a program invoked crystal knock.
All the usual subs was to politicians immediately heard about
the incident and condemned the anti Semitism. But it turns
out it was complete opposite. The original Sky News report
actually reported as it being provoked by the Jews, by
the Israelis. Then they reversed it despite the fact that
all the evidence of all the reportage they had about
the incident justified the original story of indicated the original story.
So basically there's a spinning going on to switch the narrative,
to control the narrative, if you will, so in any ways,
it's many ways this incident encapsulates the the past one
hundred and twenty years Western history, right.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, you know, it's one of those things
that you start trouble and if you control the press,
if you can control, if you control the narrative, you
can go and start trouble, be as violence as you want.
You can drop two thousand pound bombs on buildings, and
you know, the press says that the nine hundred civilians
that were killed in there, well the price was worth
it because you know there was one you know, quote
unquote terrorist hiding in the basement. And you just see
the same thing here. But this is more like what
the original program of the programs are, the famous nineteen
oh five programs where had Jewish revolutionaries with guns in
many cases more well armed than the police, and the
black Russians rising up committing revolutionary violence, and then when
the host country fights back, they screamed that you know,
they're being we're being pogrammed. They are crying out in
anger as they strike you as per normal. And then
if you they controlled the press even back then in
nineteen oh five, not every newspaper, because there were a
couple of Russian newspapers that reported it correctly, but yeah,
they did that back then. One specific program there, If
this sounds familiar, they put babies and ovens. They were nailing.
They had driven nails into a woman's head, into a
jew's head, and yeah, so it just really goes to
show how important it is to be able to control
the narrative when you're going to go out there act
like complete sociopaths. And then then once you know, someone
starts kicking your ass back, then you know you can
cry out in pain and say, look, look we're being
you know, just like the every time the last two
thousand years, we were doing nothing at all, and they
were just jealous of us, and they were jealous of
our riches and wealth and our how successful we are,
and they just started beating us.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think as early as nineteen oh nine, the
Jewish Lobary was able to get the United States to
rescind a trade agreement with Russia because of the narratives
the programs in Russia.
Speaker 2: But they got it in nineteen oh five. They had
one in nineteen oh five. Yeah, yeah, it's yeah. I've
asked people, I like, would why would we Sanctionussia in
nineteen oh five over violence against Jews in Odessa of
all places in nineteen oh five, Yeah, exactly, exactly why
what happened, What happened from from nineteen from eighteen eighty
to eighteen ninety in this country that may have caused
something that happens halfway around the world in nineteen oh five,
that has nothing to do with the United States. For
the United States to sanction Russia.
Speaker 1: Despite the fact that there's oars. Russia been an ally
of the United States, particularly during the Civil War, when
I think the Russia used this navy to dissuade or
deter any European intervention in North America to take advantage,
you know, of what's going on during the American Civil War.
But yeah, it's just one of these things where there's
a narrative they provoke an incident that they portrayed themselves
as victims and like I said that the Jewish as
the was a little Polish saying the Jewish paraphrase, but
the Jewish so wholigan cries that in pain as he
strikes you, you know, and it got exposed. But it
was an attempt again to it was a proper it
was it was apparently it looks like an operation, a
propaganda operation, to create an incident, to stir up a problem,
to control the narrative good create the narrative of Jewish
perennial Jewish victimization. That's what we're trying to promote here,
despite the fact that often they provoke problems and often
the it's the reaction that gets the uh, the coverage
and the press and the media as the end whoever
controls the narrative. It's interesting this also occurred when they're
trying to pass the anti Semitism awareness built through to
the Senate. Yeah, through the lame duck Senate. And so
it might have somebody to do it trying to control,
you know, influence Western media there for influence American politics,
because an anti Semitism bill would make it illegal effectively illegal,
and cause campuses to criticize Israel. There. I think it's
title six where there's an anti Israeli protest, your title
your I'm sorry, your university can lose federal funding because
it's it's it's uh interpreted as an anti Semitic uh
and therefore an illegal action. There to be a protest,
and apparently it's it's there to protect the feelings of
Jewish students on campus. Mm hmm, because no can cite
any particular acts of violence. By the way, uh.
Speaker 2: Right, Why are the Jewish students special?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Why should they be protected against feeling bad for
supporting a foreign government that's engaged in ethnic cleansing, particularly
when it's United States government's being born and manipulated by
that foreign government to help them in the slaughter. So
the protests are you know, are understandable, but why should
you I mean does any other group are they shielded
from protests that make them may make them feel bad?
I mean, do ethnic whites get the same protection or
consideration on college campuses when they have BLM protest or
any know, agitation or just campus politics in general. That's
so prevalent these days, you know, against anti white agitation,
anti Western agitation, anti Christian agitation.
Speaker 2: I mean, whites aren't a minority. Let's take Palestinian students.
I think students would. Yeah, are they getting any protections?
Are you allowed to say anything bad about them? I
think you're allowed to say whatever you want about them.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: It just goes to show that we are an occupied government.
Last time, last time I was on the show, Sammy
asked me a question, do elections matter when you have
an occupied government? And you know, we have an occupied
government or else? Laws against speech criticizing one group. You know,
it's it's amazing that Jews can tell you that they're
you know, they say, well, you know, you're just jealous
because we're successful. And then you know, you talk about know,
I can bring up over representation of Jews in like
Hollywood or anywhere like that, and that's sort of like
talking about how they're successful. But when I say it's
anti semitic.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Henry Ford is anti semitic as he was a loser.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, low i Q Francs Park one hundred and
sixty five. I Q Bobby Bobby Fisher, Chris Langham, the
man right now who alive, who has the highest recorded IQ.
And he's like, we seem to have a problem in
this country, and it seems to be Jewish people. There's
an overrepresentation of Jewish people, and it's weird that you
can't you can't say anything about them.
Speaker 1: Damn Bazaria that yeah, poker player apparently he's he's got
a little self esteem too.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, all the all the obviously, you know,
Charles Lindbergh was low IQ. Yes, one was a low IQ.
Jesus was low IQ.
Speaker 1: Apparently Moses was because he criticized Jews too.
Speaker 2: You're right, probably more than anyone in the Bible.
Speaker 1: It's like, okay, but yeah, it is a war on
free speech, meaning it's a war in America because pretty
much only thing America has really as a unifying principles
free speech. Ben Franklin said, freedom of speech is the
principal pillar of a free government. When this support is
taken away, the constitution for free society is dissolved and
tuny is erected on as ruins. It's Benjamin Franklin. John
Adams said, we don't have we do not have a
government that operates in the absence of a moral people.
Meaning so if you have a group of people that's
dedicated to promoting immorality, you know, the guys with liberty, degeneracy,
and also at the same time making war on free speech,
that group is definitively anti American and anti self government.
And that's you know, just the way it is. You
can't be promoting those things and to take the position
you support a civilized, orderly society, self governing society and
alsoppose it's guiding principles, you know, uh chief, which is
write the free speech. And so groups like the ad
l of this American Jewish Committee or any organized Jewish
organization that is advocating the passions of this bill anti
Semitism bill is fundamentally anti American. Now there are groups
that are opposing it, I you know, like the a
clu Is YC come out against it, some other Jews
have come out against it. I think there's a war
going on. I think there's the sort of the Jews
that support a more subtle approach to these things, trying
to control the narrative as they've done in the past
with you know, with uh you know, with uh scheming
behind the scenes. Uh, dynamic silence. It was called I
think uh in the day where they just used financial
influence and uh their their money power to intimidate people,
to keep them from talking, to deny them jobs, get
them fired. This is sort of an all out of
salt of full functional assault on the First Amendment. And
it's out in the open, and I think you have
a group of Jews that before to pursue it. There
might be some principle they're not denying that, but I
think overall you're seeing Jews that are saying they're going
overboard on this and it's going to come back to
burn them if they're two over because it's there for
all to see. Now. You can't deny it with his bill.
Speaker 2: If you're yeah, I've always said I don't people have
like I've been approached to like run for office. I'm like,
are you out of your mind? There's thousands of hours
of me out there talking. But I've always said I'd
rather be the person behind the scenes, you know, writing
a speech or doing something like that. You know. Yeah,
but policy, and I don't think they really understand the
mistake they made in Biden's cabinet being eighty percent Jewish
all the top positions being Jewish and having four hundred
and fifty seven Jews, like working immediately in the executive.
Speaker 1: Because there's an endless, endless supply or shop a score
willing to do your bidding. Of course, of course you
pay them enough, they're going to do it.
Speaker 2: I mean, well or you know, I don't think it's
money anymore. I think it's blackmail. I think they have
something on every one of them, you know, because you know,
I know we're going to get into this. But Matt
Gates's dad is Matt Gates. His family is worth hundreds
of millions of dollars. His dad started a health system
done in Florida and sold it. He's not the kind
of you know, and he's never taken a pac money.
He's never taken money from any Jewish organization. I know
he said stuff about you know, he said positive stuff
bout Jews, but I mean he's in Florida, yes, yeah, yeah, okay,
but well how did they It's like, Okay, this guy
is a loose can and he's out there. Yeah, it
has to be something sexual. They had to get him
on something sexual. And I think they have something. And
you Tucker Carlson just the other night talking to Glenn
Greenwaltz that he believes that all the porn sites are
controlled by the intelligence agencies and the dating sites, and
that's how they're get that's how they're able to control. Now.
I don't even know it's how much it is money anymore.
Is I think those a pack you know mass he
talked about those APAC babysitters. I think those APAC babysitters
are coming in there with folders and being like, you
want to look at this, see these pictures right here
and everything. I don't know how much it is about
money anymore. I'm sure it's always in their money, is
always in their money as power, you need that to
to grease to the wheels sometimes. But I think a
lot of these people are are just compromised, and I
think it's very easy to see in just how quickly
they'll flip and how quickly they will just jump to
you know, fifty seven standing ovations for a guy who
may be one of the most repulsive people who's ever
walked the planet.
Speaker 1: Didn't people's how many did people of mine? People saw
a Godfather part too, Senator Senator Geary, Oh.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Senator Geary Mmember. I mean the way he talked
to Michael in the beginning of that movie. You're just like, Oh,
something's gonna happen to this guy. And they just they
took care of him through sexual blackmail and yeah, murder.
They knew what his proclivities were, and you know, he
the way he acted in that in that Senate hearing
was just hilarious. It was just so over the top,
like I'm owned by these people. Just tells that speech
and then excuse it, gives that speech and then excuses himself.
Speaker 1: I'm called from other community duties. But from the let
me just say this, from the days of Christopher Columbus
to n Rico Fermi, Americans Italian community have been patriotic.
Yeah yeah, all that blah.
Speaker 2: Blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Masterful movie. But it also shows that sort of
the weaknesses that the hypocrisy and the weaknesses of of
of of people make themselves vulnerable to this right, and
this is uh libido dominandi. And it's not just because
they control you psychologically and lust darkness to mine all
that is. You become controlled because they got you either
with a dead girl or a live boy right of churse,
I might explain why Joe Scarborough changed from being a
conservative publican. No doubt there's a dead girl found in
his office. Yeah, I'm not saying that's what happened. I'm
just saying it's interesting, you know. Yeah, yeah, look into that.
Just look at that, look into that. Yeah, if you're
not familiar to that story, those were listening. But chausse
now he's kissing you want to go kiss the ring, right, don't.
Speaker 2: Very It's very interesting because one you can say, why
is he doing it? And really it's I think this
is just to save their careers. Yeah, it's like okay,
we go there. You know, it's like maybe they won't point,
maybe no one will look into that, reopen the dead
girl case or something like that. But really I think
it's just look, we're It's not like twenty sixteen, and
where in twenty sixteen CNN was dead, the ACLU was
at their lowest in getting getting donations, things like that,
and then yet four years of just CNN, I mean,
all of cable TV's ratings going through the roof a,
CLU record donations, Act Blue, all the BLM money was
going into Act Blue. I mean, not all of it,
but a good part of Like if you were on
the if you went to the BLM site and you
clicked on donated, went to Act Blue, So they collected
all this money and then yeah, really, what the Democrats
really should be doing right now is they should be
kicking themselves that, you know, they stole that election because
if they hadn't stalled, If they hadn't stalled that election,
Trump would be president. He'd be it would be part two.
Pence is still vice president? Who does you know who
who's his? Haven't it? I mean basically the GOP would
be dead, and I think the GOP is dead anyway,
like the classic GOP. I think, you know, the only
thing that's left is like trump Ism and MAGA. But yeah,
they they could and what did they do. They took
it over and it seems like for four years or
three and a half. However, what do you want to say,
all they've done is we're just going to punish these
people for voting for this guy and championing championing him
for four years, and we're going to call you fascist.
We're going to do speeches in front of red walls,
you know, red walls with stormtroopers. We're going to push
trands down your throat. And they didn't. They're not They're
either not smart enough or it's just hubris to think
that that was going to work, that they were actually
going to change, you know, And when you think about it,
if they had the idea that they were going to
change America, like the average America, American factory worker was
going to become pro trends and all this and everything,
all they have to do is look back in history.
I mean when when when American John Reid went to
Russia during the Bolshevik Revolution, He's like, I promise you,
he told Lennon, I promise you the American worker will
stand with you when you and it's like, are you
kidding me? What is I mean? Learned from history? You
try and push this stuff down people's throats. I mean,
just look at the way the way people reacted to
the you know, Hugh ac and McCarthy. I mean, of
course the regime came down hard on him, but the
American people were it was, they were one behind him.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 2: It's never you can't push this. There's only so far
left that you can push the American people before they're like, no, no,
it's not going to happen.
Speaker 1: Mentioned Red's I remember that scene with Jat Nicholson. He's
playing Eugene O'Neill. Yeah, Debs, I think it's Gene O'Neil. Okay,
And she's talking to John Reed's wife. Yeah, what's your name?
What do you Allen's girlfriend?
Speaker 2: Diane Keaton?
Speaker 1: Dan Keaton, And she's all idealistic still and you know,
all the rhetoric he just kind of all cynicals, just
talking to you're going to radicalize the American work, when
all he wants is just to be uh, a little
bit as rich as the you know, as the as
their their oppressors. They just want a car and a
refrigerator like anybody else. You'd give them that, and that's it.
Gonna be radicalized. You know.
Speaker 2: It's a great That's a great movie if people people
listening have never watched that movie. Such a great movie
to see just how how clueless they were about the American,
the American work, and just to see how how revolution
how immediately revolutionary the Bolsheviks got in in Russia. How yeah,
this wasn't about the worker, about the common man. They
could care less about them in the car started murdering
them immediately. But just such a I mean, just a
great movie. Great sometimes, yeah, would be a good movie.
Speaker 1: I haven't seen it in years, but I just know
that scene where he's in that room, when he tries
to sleep with her again. That's that's his only that's
a that's his objective at night. Uh. But yeah, it's
they made a folk here out of Trump. They could
have just let him go away whither away, and they
refused to do that. They just they pursued them. They
pursued his supporters, you know, they I think still a
thousand people sitting in jail still or close to that.
We didn't.
Speaker 2: Let's let's hope on day one he pardons and Grant's
clemency had every single one of them.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, so we hope for that. That's at the
minimum for that, so we have. Of course, we're sixty
days out from his administration. Yeah, and his I guess
he's trying to put together a cabinet. They're apparently today
or yeah, yesterday Matt Gates dropped out and you mentioned blackmail,
of course, Chris, Chris. The accusation was that he had
had a sexual of course with a seventeen year old girl,
and of course there's no evidence for it other than
the fact that some of um said they witnessed it,
which is which is weird.
Speaker 2: So what's interesting is a lot has come out in
the past twenty four hours about that. It seems like
the full story has come out. And what did you
know it there's Berg's and Steen's and son all throughout
the whole story. I know, I'm shocked, but I mean,
there is a chance. It looks like from the story,
there is a chance that he did have sex with
a seventeen year old girl who was given a legit
Florida ID to make her older older ID by a Greenberg,
Joshua Greenberg, who worked for as a tax collector in
some county or something like that.
Speaker 1: Okay, So and so then it comes back to haunt him.
So obviously it appears that's sort of a setup.
Speaker 2: Then, yeah, I mean, I think he My personal opinion
following this right from the start is I think he
stepped down on his own. I think the Nixon thing
where it's just like, it's better for the country if
I just go, you know, retreat to the shadows right now.
I can come back later once all this is cleared,
and yeah, I think that's I think that that's what happened.
I don't know if there was any forty chess here.
You know, my friend Orn McIntire says, it's not even
forty chess, it's two D chess. It's like, literally right
out of art of the deal that they would that
Trump may put someone like Gates in there, who he
knows everybody would freak out about. I mean, everybody freaked out.
People who don't like him and people who like him.
Everybody just had yeah, holy crap, you've got to be
kidding me, and you know, in in a bad way
and in a good way. And it just seems like,
and what does he do when after he does that,
he puts as the attorney, as the deputy AG and
then the assistant to the Deputy AG, two head choppers
of his personal lawyers who are completely loyal to him,
and puts them in the background.
Speaker 1: Is he the one who threatened to James's fat ass
in jail?
Speaker 2: No, that was that was Smith. I think that is
that guy's last name. Ironically, Smith. I can't remember who
that was, but no, it wasn't Todd Blanche Todd Blanch
that and uh email email Bove would never do that.
But these guys are like like like Todd Blanche's he
like both of them worked for the Southern Southern District
of New York in the Office of a Sudden Distraint
or which is the most powerful attorney's office in the
whole country. And and Blanche worked at the oldest law
firm I can never pronounce it, Salowander or something like that,
the oldest Wall Street firm. I mean, these guys are
They're completely loyal to him. They're like, these are just soldiers.
And once I saw them get put in the background,
I was like, oh, okay, I see what's happening here.
They're gonna come after Gates and if they do, force
Gates out, and it looks like he probably wouldn't have
won the vote anyway.
Speaker 1: Unt either for dissenters.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, so that he probably wouldn't got the vote anyway.
But and then he puts this woman from Florida in
who just seems like this this makes everyone happy. All
I'm concentrated on is is Bove and uh boven Blanche,
because those are the guys who've been defending him throughout
all of this and seeking to get him clear his name.
And they seem like the two biggest loyalists out of all,
out of every I mean, he's appointing all loyalists, which
is which is great because I mean the first time around,
you know, but those two guys, that those two guys
give me hope that I think something's going on, that
there's going to be a real push to make some
people pay.
Speaker 1: Yeah, which is necessary. It's not just it's justice because
you need a sort of a neither long un lives
light to get rid of some of these people, to
make them feel consequences for their abuses.
Speaker 2: Yeah. There, you're going to need to if you really
What these two appointments tell me is is that and
we were saying this on the election nights stream, if
he's not going to invoke his Article two privileges as
a president and become an article to president that then
this is going to be just you know, twenty sixteen
two point zero. But these two guys let me know
that it sounds like he's going to he wants some
heads to roll, and he wants to make examples out
of people. And that gives me hope for just I
not hope that it's going to change my life or
make my life better at all. But I mean tons
of entertainment first of all, and really you do like
to see justice in the world because these people are
monsters there, their absolute scum of the earth. I don't
care if they're compromised, you know, just there are a
lot of people who've been compromised in the past who've
been like, screw you, release whatever you have on me.
I don't care. I'm going to keep doing what I'm doing.
Screw you. It's one of the reasons when I was
on a live stream last night and I've said, it's
kind of upset at Gates because Gates should have just
been like, screw you, you know, and should have just
kept going. And it makes me wonder, you know, just
exactly how much a lot of his writer is bluster.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah, I mean he is a politician.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so, you know, a rich he's a rich kid too.
Doesn't mean, you know, so is Trump. It doesn't mean
that he is not somebody who's intense on doing good
or you know, has a concept of no bless a
believe or something like that. But you know, you really
want to see somebody just push through something like this
and go, no, screw you, I'm not stepping down for anything.
You're gonna have to kick me out of here. You're
gonna have to see you're gonna have to say no
to me. And we want the you know, what better
way to stir the base, because they always say, oh
Trump gets elected, it's like a pressure valve for the right.
The right's going to relax and they're not going to
YadA YadA. What better way to like keep that pressure
going than to have Gates go there and for them sit,
for the Republican, for the GOP to say no, and
then you know, you just you realize just how screwed
this whole thing is and how much it just needs
to be gutted. But we're not going to see that
at least from this Our RFK Junior might be a
different story.
Speaker 1: Well, that's a whole other canter worms over the HSS
and a big farmer of FDA, the food industrial complex,
the medical industrial complex, the whole things with the vaccines
they're calling anti vaccine. Isn't uh, I'm more skeptical vaccines
than he is.
Speaker 2: Actually, yeah, you know, I.
Speaker 1: Mean it's like but to clearly misrepresent him his positions.
He wrote a book if you want to scare his
book he wrote very in just book, where a big
part of it is devoted to debunking the HIV A typothesis,
which is interesting. He addresses Peter Dusenberg Dusburg and all
that he gets in the Fauci's corrupt career, you know. Uh,
and so that's an interesting apartment's appointment. Uh if he
gets confirmed and that, I mean, that's people don't realize
just how corrupt. I mean, the medical industrial complex, big farmer,
it's that's as corrupt as like kind of the defense industry.
Speaker 2: Well, and it's better and it's more, it's better funded. Yeah. Yeah,
there's more money going through that than Yeah. Everybody wants
to talk about the military industrial complex because obviously it
kills people. It makes the enemies of of people all
around the world who then hate Americans. But I mean
when you look at like today he said that over
the Uh, the attorney the Surgeon General is going to
be doctor Jeannette Neshawak. Do you know who she is?
She wrote a book on like I think the subtitle
was like Miracle, Medical Miracles or something like that. She's like, yeah,
she's very much like into that. And then Centers for
Disease Control is doctor Dave Weldon, who is a he
actually served in Congress at one point, but he he's
a Trump loyalist one. And then over the FDA Marty
Marty McCarry, who's another one who's just a who's an
oncologist at John hopp and Johns Hopkins and you know,
another Trump guy. Just the one thing you can't say
about it. You can say whatever you want. Oh my god,
these guys are Zion. It's the whole frigging country is Zion.
That's pretty much except for like like.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, I mean you had this appointment. Yeah,
I mean obviously the the uh uh the Kennedy appointment.
It's bipartisan, right, I mean you should We're supposed to
praise those things. It's got everyone upset, you know, the
stas upset. And again he's not a medical doctor. Where
you don't need a medical doctor to head the agency.
You need someone like a lawyer who can perform that
the forensic investigations to expose the corruption. You know, that's
mine like that, you know, yeah.
Speaker 2: It's one of the things that we that I guess
people who are younger or maybe people have just forgotten.
Is the whole Obamacare debacle that was that was a war,
that was a that was a fight that was still
people who remember, you know, the the website coming online
and not even working. This is something that if he
can go in there and he can basically start gutting
and doing what needs to be done in order to
our medical system is a show. It's still better than
the you know, a lot of the free medical around
the world. Yeah, it's it could be so much better.
And the fact that we are how much older the
population is getting, how much fatter the population is getting.
I mean, you need somebody in there who actually is
a lawyer can root this out, but someone who also
actually really does care about health. Yeah, then that I
think that means a lot. That that's different than you know,
the typical managerial kind of apparatic that you would have
come in and who would just run it so that
we keep running the same way. So it's going to
be interesting to see because.
Speaker 1: The revolving doors keep those rents spinning, right, That's right.
Speaker 2: But even more so than Matt Gates, if you had,
you know, people saying fighting against RFK Junior who He's like, look,
I just want to make America healthy again. If you
have a fight against that people coming after that, you know,
that's something that you could really wake people up. And
you know you have, you know, something we can talk
about a little bit more. As these elites and every
these elites that are popping up, and you know when
when they when they see how the people are reacting,
you know, they put their finger up to up to
the wind and they're like, Okay, let's see how people
are how people are moving. And I think it's obvious
that people want to see the food, the food cleaned up,
the food supply cleaned up, the food, the food supply
more streamlined. You know, we don't want our pork to
come from China. Yeah, you know, we we want to
see you know, we want people to have a choice
of whether to vaccinate their kids. And just to be
more really just too. I would love to have them
just release all the files on vaccinations, the private vaccine
courts and everything, declassify all of those cases.
Speaker 1: To release the data, release the data.
Speaker 2: The show Why are you scared? If it's I mean,
trust the science, right, Well, let's trust the science. Show
us the science let's figure it out for ourselves.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The again, people don't realize the most people don't
look into the history of sort of the development of
you know, medicine, medical industry and how it was cardinalized
in early twentieth century. But you know, with the Flextion
and report and how it's been integrated with big pharma,
and how medical schools are heavily funded by pharmaceutical agencies
and it's little, little or nothing's done to the research
and the quality of food has on our health and
also how to deal with things like chronic illnesses and
overall health. It's it's all deal with you know, basically
it's chemical poison to deal with a lot of illnesses.
That's what the pharmaceutical industry does, you know, and you
need at least a little skepticism there. And in course
with COVID exposed the corruption of the public health infrastructure
or system in our country and how it's all integrated
with people like Bill Gates, right, and Imperial College of
London and these. This outfit was sort of a self
licking ice cream cone, sort of a circular environment. The CDC,
you with the it wasnt the Epidemic Intelligence Service which
basically is dedicated to finding a viral cause for all
the health problems in the world as opposed to environmental
problems or toxicity or polluting of the food systems in
these things. Because with that, if you expose that problem,
then you have liability, corporate liability. But if you blame
it on a virus, a novel virus, you can avoid
the liability. And that goes that goes back as far
back as polio. And it's supposedly you know, uh uh
stop polio with with you know, with the jab which
is also very controversial.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean polio. If you look at the numbers
polio when by the time the polio vaccine came out,
the polio was like on a steep down, a steep
on on the graph going down because well why because
water treatment was was getting it was becoming modernized. Also,
some of the first vaccines for polio actually gave people polio. Yeah, me,
thousands of people polio.
Speaker 1: A cutter cutter incident, and people don't know about that.
It's not hill, Yeah, I think it was, uh who
the second guy doctor not then remember the first said
that actually, you know, the politics can caused more paralysis
than the wild virus did. Yeah, you know.
Speaker 2: People you know, oh, do you want to have polio?
It's like, I mean, as long as our water treatment
facilities are working, I think the chance of us getting
polio is pretty pretty low. It's not really going to
not really going to affect us, you know. And then
you have the whole thing about well.
Speaker 1: You know, Saban, Saban was his name.
Speaker 2: Yeah, oh yeah, my kids, my kids aren't.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. They pulled the sock one from the market
because it was causing it was damage, and they instituted
the Sabin vaccine. Then they did the sugar cube thing
and all that.
Speaker 2: It was yeah, yeah, what was the what was the
one that caused all.
Speaker 1: The Jonas socks vaccine? That's right, yes, yeah, yeah, and
then the Saban ones is too because it was apparently
it was a dead virus. It was first it was
attenuated and the dead one. Then even the sock i mean,
Saban in the seventies said that even the vaccines were
causing more paralysis than the wild virus ever caused.
Speaker 2: Salt and Sabin the Pumish.
Speaker 1: Suck did write a book about you know, was it
Survival of the Wisest and how you know, it could
be jugs could be used for reducing the population. So
I don't know, when there's a lot of mythology there.
It's again, it goes back to narrative control, doesn't it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Yeah, yeah, the you know, it's one of those
things too where I don't think Trump wins this time.
It Filann doesn't buy Twitter.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's a that was a game changer. I mean
that was because basically it opened up uh, controlling, controlling
the narrative and any number of issues, isn't it. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I know people are like, you know, I was,
I was at the American Renaissance Conference last weekend, and
Jared Taylor is still not back on Twitter. I think
at this point it's just an oversight. I don't know,
I think it probably you could probably get back on Twitter.
Speaker 1: Jared Chayll is pretty I mean, he's pretty modern compared
to like Michael Jones.
Speaker 2: Oh oh, absolutely, yeah. I mean I was fan talking
to Jared Tayler and Jared Taylor and Mark Weber. I mean,
you know, Mark Webber is a little bit more of
a bomb thrower than, yeah, than Jared Taylor is. Michael
Jones is just dropping bombs on Twitter all day.
Speaker 1: So, I mean, yeah, j bombs, So the I mean
Jared Taylor is like it's like, as far you from
the standpoint of the regime, he's far more acceptable because
he doesn't.
Speaker 2: Well well, he's also far more effective when people listen
to Jared Taylor talked, you know, because he talks so easy,
you know, doctor Jones, just you know, bomb after bomb
after bomb, you know, no filter whatsoever. You know, mister
Taylor is very effective in what he does, and he
gets people to listen to him, and he gets invited
on you know, he used to get invited on mainstream
mainstream shows.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he used to be on c SPAN a lot.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Apparently apparently there's this video of him on YouTube
where it's an older video where he's him giving a speech.
I guess he used to sell software. It's a speech
to him like giving us like a software, like a
presentation on software. I haven't I haven't tracked it down yet,
but that would be interesting.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I just saw a thing back in the nineties.
He was doing some cable show talking about the immigration,
the sixty five civil rights ack, what's going to do
in thirty years of the country And so here we
are most thirty years later and oh.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and now he's he's clearly advocating, openly advocating for secession,
saying that that's really the only way. I mean, we're
not going to have mass deportations of we may have
mass deportations of illegals, but there's a lot of people
here who are here illegally that are the problem as well.
Speaker 1: So yeah, this this talks like you. It's sort of
thing in Denver, the mayor they're just saying they have
to cut back services to residents because of lack of
federal support for illegal immigrats. They call them newcomers, So
they're like closing the parks and stuff or cutting back
at DMV service so they can they can continue to
pay for the illegals, the newcomers, as they say. Now,
the thing about that is this is something which this
is something that the Trump administration arkatu president can do.
Is when you have a governor of say Pritszicker of Illinois,
or a mayor in Colorado or Washington or California, uh,
saying that they're a sanctuary city and they're going to
aid a legal ailien, that's a violation of federal law.
And he just arrest them, arrest them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, just arrest them, and you can just put
him in jail until you clean the city out, however
long that takes.
Speaker 1: And that means I mean, if you mean it, that's
these are the measures you have to be gonna have
to be taken.
Speaker 2: What's about will? And that's I guess that's really the
only question on this second term. He's been given a mandate,
overwhelmingly won on the electoral college, won the popular vote.
Does he have the will to do the things that
need to be done in order to well, I mean,
just the things that he's promised. Yeah. I think there's
a lot of people who are like, well, he didn't
start any new wars in the first the first term.
If he just does what he promises on immigration, that'll
be a success. It'll be a four year success, it'll
be something to build upon going forward. And you know,
it's just a matter of will, if you may, may
he have the will of bo Kelly, May he have
the will of Naive bu Kelly to do what needs
to be done in order to clean up the country
in any way, in any way that he has promised
he will he have.
Speaker 1: The channel is enter Carl Schmidt.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean he's going to have to decide the exception,
you know, and we have and he can legally do
that through Article two. And so he's going to have
to become a dictator, and he's going to have to
be more. He's gonna have to be a dictator on
more than just day one.
Speaker 1: And you have this because his selection for the Fence Department.
This guy heg sith he's a lunatic Zionist, Christian Zionist.
He was talking. I saw, I'm giving a speech turning
at the Miracle of Israel and it was at all
places that King David people there.
Speaker 2: I mean, we know that Christians, Christian Zionists are nuts
and we have some baking actually insane.
Speaker 1: But but he's also said something about cracking down and
all the you know, the d I insanity at the
Pentagon and and he's good on that issue. But then
again there so I mean, what do you do there.
Speaker 2: To war unilaterally? Neither, Yeah, that's a thing, Yeah, you know,
it's just you you'd rather have people in there who weren't.
One thing that he's done is I think you've probably heard.
Speaker 1: This is Lloyd Austin run the Pentagon.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I know you've heard this term Florida occupied government. Yeah,
he's basically brought He's bringing all of Florida in which, yes, yes,
think about it. If you're a lot of these people
are not swamp creatures. Now you could say that, you
could say that Marco Rubio is, and that he's a
Zionist and he's radical and everything. But it may just
be better to get him out of the Senate because
then he can do in my opinion, he does more
damage in the Senate than he does as Secretary of State.
Speaker 1: Yes, yes, that's a good point. He has no legislative
power anymore.
Speaker 2: Yes, right, so, and he doesn't he can't start a
war on his own. He could try to push for one.
But we know how I mean, Trump what Trump's just
going to call him little Marco again.
Speaker 1: Yes, Well, the Secretary of State doesn't necessarily have to
handle all foreign issues that he's an also concerned with
domestic matters. Theoretically, we've gotten used to the Secretary State
cons from a foreign policy.
Speaker 2: But and one thing I saw immediately was the fact
that you know, he's Latin. He speaks Spanish. They love
him in Latin America. He hates communists, and he is
a hard hearted son of a gun who if he
sees a child crying because their family is being deported,
he's not going to care. So maybe he was brought
in to deal with all these Latin American countries that
all these people are going to be sent back to. Yeah,
Secretary of State doesn't have to be about war. They
have to deal. They have to be the official diplomat
basically the official and not diplomat, but they have to
be the official go between between the president and other countries.
And if you are going to have this mass deportation
event and it's mostly going to be going back to
Latin countries, you know that's good. The one thing I
saw from Emil Bove, who is would be the third
in line attorney general, is this guy does not like
Venezuela at all. He's like, I think he's prosecuted Maduro's brother,
Maduro's son in a couple of cases. He's actually tried
to go after Maduro himself. And I honestly believe I
don't believe that it is propaganda that Venezuela is sending
their worst here. I think it's very evident when you
look at places like Aurora, Colorado, and I've been told
places in Indiana, Illinois, other places where these you know,
this gang, these Venezuelan criminals are And I think very
clearly and i'm i'm I would not discount the whole
thing with Trump and bu Kelly that bu Kelly wasn't
driving some people out and back to the MS thirteen,
back out and back to the United States as well.
And I think those two have had a talk, and
I know Gates has gone down there and talked to him.
And more so, what's his name, Eric Prince, who I
think is going to be out, will be like I
want a very powerful person who's not elected, who can
be a free agent and he can be sent out
to do things and and speak to certain people. And
you know when you have someone like that, that puts
a little more fear into people because you know he's
he's not really there. He's there in an official capacity,
but not an official capacity that could get him in trouble.
Speaker 1: Any chance that the Trump administration will investigate, well, what
would occur to the the Department of Home Owned Security
under MAJORCAS and their connections to NGOs like Source and
the role and the illegal immigration. The fellow government actually
violating its own laws by facilitating and supporting illegal immigration.
You think that's a violation of federal law too. Aid
in the bet illegal limeration, the federal government's doing it
itself just today, or the bad administration is on its
way out as instituting another app these refugees who have
cell phones somehow and to expedite the process to get
them into the country faster.
Speaker 2: Still, I mean, in I mean, I know this isn't
a permanent solution, but I think it's pretty obvious that
the hardcore Zionists have abandoned the Democrat Party because you know,
the Democrat politicians may be pro Israel, but their activists aren't.
Their activists have become an anti Zionist, which means that
they've gone over to the GOP and they're trying to
influence and they've they're they're infiltrating MAGA, these quote unquote
right wing Zionists. I mean, is there any chance that
out of their own self interest, they would be for
looking into what my orchies did and all these all
this mass immigration when they see that maybe we screwed
up by sending with this whole mass immigration thing that
we've been planning for twenty five and thirty years to
you know, punish Europe and punish the United States. That
maybe this, maybe this backfired on us, and maybe we'll
maybe we'll try to be a part of this just
for our own self interest.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean a good example, when we started the
conferences by Amsterdam, they're apparently the Jewish soccer fans are
attacking Palestinians and Amsterdam. Why are there ethnic Palestinians and
as Amsterdam?
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I mean we I think they got there.
And an article came out the other day that I'm
looking up. It was in the some like the inter
Mountain Jewish Journal or something like that, something I never
really heard of. And then I find out that it's
like one of the oldest Jewish one of the old
Jewish periodicals in in the United States. And the article
basically says looks like they may have taken the article down.
I do have a I do have a screenshot of
it though, where they were saying that where is it.
It's somewhere that the mass immigration into Europe was punishment
for the Holocaust, but they openly admit in it that
it is that it was punishment for the Holocaust. So yeah,
I mean just saying the quiet part out loud, trying
to find see if I yeah here, No, it's her
rights thing, but yeah, there was. They were quoting somebody.
I think I put it on my It's on my
timeline somewhere. But yeah, I mean they're openly they're openly
admitting that their culture needed to be destroyed because they
allowed the Holocaust to have And then the rest of
the article was well and this we see what happened
in amsterdamim and this is blowback from what this punishment
of Europe. So the quiet part out loud is is
something that they have a habit of doing. You just
have to listen for it. Listen and look at look
for it.
Speaker 1: I didn't even if you accept the received narrative of
the Holocaust.
Speaker 2: Here it is. I found it this inter Mountain Jewish News, Thursday,
November twenty first, Europe's payback for the Holocaust. Shimone Felder
was right. Permit us to introduce shimone Felder. The IJN
that's this newspaper wrote and published a profile on him
in two thousand and one. He was one of the
few listen to this. He was one of the few
child survivors of bergen Belsen and Biberock, and one of
many Holocaust survivors the IGN has profiled over the years.
Felder's story was different that his mother, father, sister, and
grandmother survived, perhaps for that reason, or because of an
innate goodness, or because he was a world traveler, linguist
and a stute observer. Felder commented, Europe's punishment for the
Holocaust is the destruction of its culture, the fact that
radical Islam is taking over the continent.
Speaker 1: Europe. So now the guiltful Holocaust is not extended to
all of Europe as opposed to just Germany.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I guess, I guess France didn't do enough, England
didn't do enough, Check didn't do enough. Yeah, everybody has
to suffer. No Spain, look at Spain. Spain's becomes so
they're gonna I think they're just they're going to do
amnesty on three hundred thousand, close to a million people now,
because you know the spirit of this age and the
Nuremberger's game, the Nremberg regime isn't only happening here Europe
is we are occupied territory, and so is all of Europe.
So yeah, and they everyone in a while, they just
admit it out loud.
Speaker 1: Hmm uh. But that's just one Jew saying that though
you can't.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean the fact that the fact that you
see that this is exactly what happened. That doesn't matter.
It was like the authoritarian personality, We're going to do this, this, this,
we were recommended to do this, this, this, this, this, this
and this, and then every one of those things happens.
It's like, well, that's just a book written by by
four guys who by three Jews and a Shabaskoy who
you know, they don't That doesn't mean anything.
Speaker 1: This guys, these guys are very powerful, those four.
Speaker 2: Guys, very literally working with the c I A.
Speaker 1: Yeah, wow, okay, Hollywood, say you know, it's like Norman Lear,
He's just one movie television producer.
Speaker 2: Come on, you see Rob Brier, Rob Braner is going
to move out of the country.
Speaker 1: Oh no, where's he going to go?
Speaker 2: I don't know, I don't know. Apparently Ellen de Generes,
her pedophile, pedophile self is moved to England.
Speaker 1: Well tell Rob Bryaner. The real estate prices are plummeting
in Israel. So I a deal.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's funny. It's funny. No one's escaping. No one's
talking about escaping to there, are they? What have they lost?
Two million so far? Two million left?
Speaker 1: Because yeah, that's and the probably the best in the brightest, right,
that's who he would go.
Speaker 2: Right, Well, I mean the ones that definitely could afford
to do it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, they're the best of the brightest, the richest,
I don't know, necessarily the best of the brightest. Also,
but the Trump also selected a treasure secretary if I understand.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, former Sorrows guy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but he supports high terriffs.
Speaker 2: Yes, yeah, well, well I.
Speaker 1: I forget name.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I talked to someone this afternoon, and you know,
we were we were having a discussion. It's like, you know,
I've worked for companies, I've worked for people I didn't
agree with before. It's a job. And the thing about
Besson is now, I'm not making any claims that this
guy is not a some kind of operative or anything
like that. I mean he helped. He helped with the
crashing of the of the pound, which is where I
think Soros made the overwhelming majority of his of his wealth.
Is that what it was it was shorting the pound
by Christ so he was.
Speaker 1: He was around thirty was it thirty five years ago
or something?
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, Yeah. The way I look at it is
he's apparently he's been on the side of the America
First agenda for for a while. If anything, he knows
where the body's are buried, he knows how to do this,
he knows the global economy works.
Speaker 1: So if he is, well, high tariffs are anti globalism
my definition, right, I mean, that's yes.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know, I've been I've been reading Friedrich List
lately and on the America. He has a bunch of
letters on the American economy. And he made this point
and it was so simplistic, but it just really it
hit me hard. He said, there's three kinds of economics.
There's personal economics, national economics, and global economics. He said,
personal economics is a given, you can't get rid of that.
He goes, but national economics, and you can only have
individual economics with one or the other. If you have
global economics, you don't have national economics. If you have
national economics, global economics fades into the background. So if
you have people who are pushing for you know, personal
like I said, personally, given national economics, a national economy,
then it is by definition anti globalists.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And to the extent you can have a national
economy that is relatively free from global economics. Will depend
on the size and scale of your economy.
Speaker 2: Right, and so do you have to bring manufacturing back home?
Speaker 1: And obviously in the United States ranks high among the
nations that could afford autarchy, you.
Speaker 2: Know, yes, yes, whereas if.
Speaker 1: You're a country like Croatia, you can't, right, because you
want to be very, very poor. You know, there's a
price for it, That's what there are. These are prices
that are paid. We're not denying that. Putting up protective
tariffs and poses a price. But what are you purchasing
with that? And what are you giving away with globalism?
That's another thing. Yeah, we learned that with COVID sort
of how these globalists that where you disperse production, you
you know, you with the interest of saving money or
higher quarterly profits, then you lose your industrial base. You
lose basically, you lose control of your own destiny in
that case, because you're you're at the women or you
suffer the vagaries of international politics which you cannot control. Well,
and what's going on in China matters now Taiwan.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, And people don't really understand how easy
it is to kick start the national economy here is
you just have to turn on all of the natural
gas and oil. We have more natural gas and oil
than anyone else and pretty much maybe Russia, but I
mean we enough to take care of ourselves and to
sell to other countries. And one thing that Europe doesn't
have is either That's why you have to build pipelines
into Europe. You're Something that Jerome Powell has been doing
at the FED for the last three years is he's
basically been going after the city of London. He's been
going to war with with the with that one square
mile city of London, Jewish controlled city of London where
all the banks are and all the dirty money in
the world goes through. And by eliminating libor and bringing
having the overnight funds rate brought back here and being
controlled by Americans, and by raising the interest raising the
interest rates here, which people are like, why are you
raising the inchewell, there's a reason. It makes it. It
makes it a lot harder for other countries to buy
our to invest in our our or control our money.
So basically he's been going to war with them, and
just another way to stick it to Europe. And that's
stick it to the average European. Okay, but the people
who control Europe, the people who going after Europe. And
I will remind you that Jerome Palell is a seventh
generation Virginian. He's the first gentile head of the Federal
Reserve in what one hundred years?
Speaker 1: Oh no, probably Paul Volker, Yeah, Vulgar, Yeah, yeah, Vulgar
for almost forty years.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Vulgar wasn't that bad. But I mean what there
was two in the last hundred years. Really really, when
you think about it.
Speaker 1: I think was it who was it? Under Carter? Carter
appointed Vulgar and then Reagan reappointed and then did the
age of green span.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and then Burnanky and people like that.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Then before that, before that you had but Burns,
I guess under Nixon. You know, all the way back
to there's one guy that had like a year under Carter,
I forget his name.
Speaker 2: Then then you can go all the way back to
World War Two and what's his name? Morgentho. So the
that's been controlled by by a certain group. And now strangely,
we have a guy in there who's been going to
war with the same people who have controlled that Federal
Reserve for a very long time, which Janet Yellen hates him,
which is why over a treasury when you're never gonna
hear anything good come out of her mouth, because I mean,
she's part of the tribe. She's also a Marxist. She's
I mean, like literally her PhD is on Marxists, on
Marxist economics.
Speaker 1: Yeah, she's one that set abortion is good because it
allows women to enter the labor market.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And so you by taking by taking control of
our own our own manufacturing, especially when it comes to
energy and controlling the exports, we can even put more
pressure on Europe. And you know, I think that just
opening up the energy market changes things drastically. But we
do have to bring other manufacturing home. I mean China.
China has one of the things that Howard Edward Lukewalker
talks about in the book gud' Ta is that any country,
like he talks about these Africa in nations who like
to go to war with their with neighboring states, but
they don't make their own weapons. They don't make their
own planes, They don't make their own anything. And the
point he makes in that is whoever they're buying their
stuff from, they're basically indebted to and basically controls them
because they not only control they're not only selling them that,
they're selling them the parts they don't know how to
fix them. So they're basically they have a lot of
control over them and China right now by having by
having so much of our manufacturing, i mean prescription drugs,
things like that, they have a lot of control over us.
And this stuff has to come home. The whole Harvard
Business School of the eighties teaching, you know, teaching business
of future CEOs to send labor, to to send their
manufacturing overseas to China and to other places. That needs
to be reversed and brought back. And you'll you'll have
the old arguments about well, we're not exporting our our
manufacturing work sporting pollution and it's about our No. Just no.
If we can have cars now that basically have cars
like gas gas powered vehicles that basically have no emissions,
we can build factories that have no emissions. That's not an.
Speaker 1: Argument in so, yeah, when you have a Cleaner Act,
which arguably the initial stages of it knocked out ninety
five percent of the air pollution, and you only have
a fraction of remaining. You've you essentially solve the problem
at that point.
Speaker 2: So I don't know that that's the way. That's the
way we get America back is don't get in any
new wars and bring manufacturing home. But the manufacturing has
to start with you know what does Trump say? Drill, baby, drill.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of inertia against that though, because the
whole cosmopolitan globalist thing. I mean, it's you no longer
have to if you definancialize the economy. Those those I guess,
those people that have made a lot of a lot
of money financializing the economy are going to resist it.
And there's those gonna be a lot of pain in
that process in converting back to a real economy.
Speaker 2: Well, I think what you're going to see is you're
going to see an elite billionaire wary people have been
blackpilling over over all these picks and everything. It's like, well,
nothing's going to change, you know, it's just gonna be
the same thing. It's like I remember Elon Musk talking
to Tucker Carlson just just a couple of months ago
and saying, if Donald Trump doesn't get elected, I'm probably
going to jail. They're going to take my businesses, will
probably nationalize everything, and that'll That'll be a lot of people,
a lot of the people like Mark Andreessen who supported Trump,
a lot a lot of people. These people who have means,
have power, have influence. It's gonna if it seems like
these old like nothing's moving, They're going to want to
move it forward. They're going to go to war because
they know Trump's out in four years. If it goes
back to business as usual as we've had for the
last four years, they're going to just come for them again.
They're gonna You'll you'll hear more about unrealized capital gains.
You'll hear more about maybe maybe maybe Elon Musk shouldn't
control uh, shouldn't control the satellites and be in charge
of our space, our space program basically in electric vehicles
and all this. You're they're going to come after them.
So the one thing, the one hope I have is
that you have powerful people and very rich people who
have a personal stake in defeating these globalists or else
they're they're screwed. And you can you can make the
argument that a lot of these guys do have global
investments and everything, but the way they've been talking in
the last year, last year, two years, they'll sacrifice all
of that just so that they can keep what they have.
And that's what this, the last four years has taught
that these this regime is not going to let people
keep what they have if it keeps going. If Kamala
Harris won this election, if they if she stole this election.
And I would like to congratulate myself for saying that
Trump would win and that we would know before we
went to sleep that night. And I know we had
to stay up a little late in order to find
that out. But you know, I knew there wasn't going
to be a steal. I had a feeling there was
going to be there was going to be trouble with
some of the Senate seats, and obviously there were, but
I had a feeling that they weren't going to turn
on the cheating machines for this. And yeah, I think
that I think that there are a lot of powerful
people who made sure that this election was going to
be clean. You saw so much purging of the voter
roles in so many states. Pennsylvania was the biggest one.
They purged like almost four hundred thousand I think, you
know that were that were probably dead or just fake.
And yeah, I mean, I honestly see a I honestly
see these elites, these ones who especially the like the
little tech guys who just want to do AI and
do come on some computing and you know, maybe build
a colony on Mars, doing as much as possible and
throwing their weight around and their money around to make
sure that this uh, as much as this of the
old regime is made impotent as they possibly can.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you're dealing with, probably with an agenda that's been
around at least since the early nineteen seventies, a sort
of de industrialization, financialization that both in Europe and the
United States began, you know, began with the closing the
Britain wood system, the petro dollar, and also in Europe
when they decided I think it's seventy five and it
sort of they sort of export there until then had
been so high wages, was the textile industry, and they
started sending it to the Asian subcontinent, Latin America, tapping
the labor sources there and undermining the working class. We
see like in Great Britain labor has other contempt for labor.
Now now they're trying to steal farms. How that's going
to work out? Like yeah, just like the end of
like Zimbabwe or something. Apparently, because there's too many white
farmers in Great Britain and you know, know, they're they're
finding that farming tends to be like a a family thing.
Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, it's a way of life. That's
how these things work. And there are a few people
that do it well. But apparently the ore the wrong color.
Speaker 2: I can't was telling me the other day, but it
was basically like they the they didn't have because of
the war upon that Powell has waged upon London and
upon the currency that Britain basically had nothing to back
their back their money with, so they backed it with
the property of England.
Speaker 1: Mm hm.
Speaker 2: So that's why you're seeing you're seeing this, You're seeing
that they may just go to take farms because that's
the collateral that they've used in order to to monetize,
to monitizeh And I mean that's insane.
Speaker 1: I mean, and that goes back to the city of
London where the all that that hot money uh for
you know, a quicksilver capital, you know, money laundering, that
sort of thing. It leads attends to there's financialization and
against industrialization and the maintenance and the and the sort
of the fostering of domestic industrial because you can make
money off the carry trade, fascinating you on working with
some grimy industry somewhere, dealing with labor and workers. And
it goes back to the whole mindset where maximum profits
and no concern for your country, no concern for your
national economy.
Speaker 2: You know, well, I mean, why do you need a
national economy if you're importing everything from somewhere else?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Really, really, what it comes down to is you're if
you're if you're not making anything and you can get
it from elsewhere. You know, what's what's the point? You know,
why why worry about that?
Speaker 1: Well, that's happened in the seventies United States, right very
when you propped up the dollar with the patriolar system.
You created a macro economic environment where domestic production not
only doesn't doesn't it matter, it's also tax because the
strong dollar abroad makes our exports more expensive, imports cheap,
and so it neverly you're going to get that happening anyway.
Aside in the fact that you have the middle of it,
all of ours, like Rockefeller, you're working with Kissinger and
in Wall Street to uh to dedustrialize the country because
they want to even everything out, so that globalist mindset, right,
even at the living standards of the world, so unite,
it has to be lowered the other the third world
needs to be raised up a little bit, you know,
so everything and even out so you can maximize your profits.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and the city of London is I would say
when people talk about how oh you know, this just
sounds like kind of conspiracy theory stuff and everything. I mean,
look at Malay. I mean, Malay is supposed to be
this a narco capitalist down in Arta. And look how
much of his gold he's sent to London. Well, why
is he sending all this gold to London? Is it
for safe keeping? No, that's not the way you do it.
He's sending it there because he's very friendly to Jewish
interests and they need backing to print money off of
don't have any. So he's like he's sending there. He's
sending their gold there as you know, Oh no, we're
depositing it there. Well, what's the purpose of him depositing
it there? So that they can do ten they can
print ten and twenty times as much. Off the back
of that, they can fractionalize that gold reserve. I mean,
that's how that's how bad off they are. That's how
bad off that London is right now.
Speaker 1: But then the UK's econour problems aren't based on having
enough gold. It's the fact that they're not producing, right,
and so you have to produce things of value. It
goes back to labor. It goes back to sort of
the is it production? Is it labor? Labor yields production.
If your economy is based on usery, which is financialization,
then you just have to get it from somewhere. And
again that you're sacrificing your domestic capacity for a phantom. Oh,
I guess you can call them fan their profits because
everything's on a ledger. That's only so long as the
musical the game musical chairs continues, right, which is what
the military is for perhaps, But what they're afraid of
is people developing sort of listing in national economies that
are independent, they can engage in marginal foreign trade for
luxury goods and items. But again, the capacity for your independence,
for your autarch, your greater defense, is based on the
scale and size of your economy, and economies like Germany,
your economies like the United States, have the capacity for
largely to be largely independent. Then you can engage in
foreign commerce for things like energy, things like that. But
then you get a peaceful world in commerce and who
there's no fun in that. You want to have war
and strife and conflict everywhere so you can maximize the
profit off that. Because that way, you like George Servos
or George Sources friends, you can you know, uh, format
a civil war somewhere, have fore knowledge of it and
then't make money off the currency debasement. And that's inevitable,
you know. That's how these things work. That's how the
large at the City of London functions too. All that
speculation based on you know, intelligence, you know.
Speaker 2: And people can talk about how you know the petro
dollar and things like that and how you know. Then
you'll have people say, well, it's not really the petro
dollar anymore. It's the military industrial complex. But we don't
even have. We're producing weapons that there aren't for us.
We send them overseas immediately. I mean, we can't. People
are like, you know, I've heard this. I had my
friend John field House, who you know, he's he was
part of an experiment where they part of a war
game where they tried to war game back in the
in the aughts, a war with Iran. And you know,
they they couldn't even figure it out. Back then, they
tried to stage from Azerbaijean. There's no way you can
stage from Azerbaijean now. But when you look at the numbers,
we don't have. We don't have as many fighting men
right now as like Ukraine had when this when their
war started. We have less than that. And where are
all of our where are all of our good weapons
we've sent them to, you know, mostly Israel. Ukraine's getting
like the cast offs, the older stuff. I mean, we're
everybody's worried about a war, and I'm like, how are
we going to fight a war we have We don't
have any soldiers, we don't have any weapons. You know,
my friend said, it would take two years to stage
this war. If you were to go to war with Iran.
Now you're not going to have an air war with Iran.
I mean there's just when you look at just the
topography of Iran, and I think they've shown well that
the Russian the Russian systems that they have are really
good at taking down taking down missiles. Now you can
go completely nuclear. But as soon as you go nuclear,
I mean everyone's going now, everyone's going to go nuclear.
I mean it's like nuclear is oh, nuclear is on
the table, and you're dealing with Iran. Who is I mean,
who's their greatest ally Russia. So I mean this and
even if you did stage war for two years, then
Iran staging a war for two years, we know they
have manufacturing. This is all just bullshit to scar us,
it really is. It's just to make us believe that
something's going to happen that it isn't. And if Israel
wants to go to if Israel wants to go to
war with Iran, I mean, we might give them weapons
to do it. And that would be horrible because we're
giving weapons to Ukraine right now, and you see exactly
how you know mister Putin is dealing with that. I mean,
this is just it's complete insanity. It's and I don't
think I know that past performance is no guarantee of future,
you know, of what the future is going to look like.
But Trump didn't start any wars, no, no, and he
is more in debt. Timothy Melon gave him, you know,
the Timothy Mellon of the famous Mellon family gave him
more money in this this time than than the Adelson
widow did. And probably Elon Musk, through his his ventures
and getting people to give money, gave more money than
both of them combined. So I mean, really, who's he serving?
Everybody thinks that he's serving like this, This is rarely
this Zionist machine. Well, I mean, if this Zionist machine
was as powerful as it as we think it is,
why are they still blackmailing people? Why are they still
giving money? Why are they still passing money under the table.
Why is everybody still having a baby's It doesn't make
any sense. If you were that all powerful, you wouldn't
even need any of that. You'd be controlling things completely. So,
I mean, I don't know. I have a lot of
us about the and there's no one anyone who's listening
to my show knows there's no one who's more anti
Zionists than I am. And I am somebody who has
no problem saying, yes, that person is a Jew and
that person is an enemy of the nation. I have
no problem with that. So me saying this, this is
just me looking at the landscape. And I could be
dead wrong. And if I'm dead wrong and it turns
out I'm dead wrong, I will say I'm dead wrong.
I will apologize, but I'm just not seeing it.
Speaker 1: Well, Uh, the American people didn't vote for an empire,
so I can not gonna vote the way out of one,
aren't they. It's gonna have to be this sort of
a sort of the back room dealing scheming, elite scheming
that you speak of, that how this how these things
going to be resolved. I mean, it's not gonna be
a referendum on the empire or a referendum on Jewish power.
It's not how these things play out in politics.
Speaker 2: Well, especially if they can't get a stronghold anywhere, and
they were they had the Left for so long or
the Democrat Party for so long. Now they're over in
the I mean they're having to jump around.
Speaker 1: But there was over eventually, there was overplay. Their hand,
that's history.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, and we're coming up on eighty years,
aren't we.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's another thing. No Jewish kingdom has ever lasted
more than eighty years.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so the big worry is they know that and
if it looks like they're not going to survive eighty years,
then you worry about what they do s Yeah.
Speaker 1: Well again, they let these lunatics get into control, right
of have too much power and influence.
Speaker 2: And you believe somebody, can you believe one of them
has not put a bullet hit yet he was indicted today,
was well, I mean by the I c C. What's
funny is did you hear England said that if England
will arrest him?
Speaker 1: Ah, right, they're right. They rested Peter Shaded back in
the day.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well that's a that's a different story. But England
said they Well I'll believe that when I see it,
because the city of London's right there. But that's that's interesting.
Maybe you know. Plus, I'm not British and I don't
know the intrigues of their elites, how their elites are
working behind.
Speaker 1: I mean, don't like most Jews hate hate nothing, how
you anyway.
Speaker 2: I from what I we know that since October seventh.
One thing that October seventh revealed is that there's a
there's a Jewish civil war going on.
Speaker 1: Yes, yeah, it's obviously there's a difference, Like as I
lose to earlier with the A, S A U coming
out against the anti Semitism Awareness bell, meaning I think
there's some more sensible Jews as WHOA, this is too
over the top, this is going to create anti Semitism.
They actually can see that, and they prefer their old
strategy of dynamic silence and subtle control. It's a form
of whispering into the year as opposed to clubbing people
over the head historically has a bit more apart, bit
more you know, has yielded more for them, you know.
Speaker 2: And that's and like I said before, that's what I
would want. I would want to be the background. I
wouldn't want to draw attention to myself. So maybe maybe
they're learning, maybe they're going to retreat into the background.
I don't know, you know, it's.
Speaker 1: It's like all the degeneracy they've been they've been promoting
for eighty years, it's gone too far, and it's like
eventually you get a reaction, you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and when you look at Israel right now, I
mean I follow a couple of telegram channels that them
and they're not in real time, but they're not far
delayed of the kind of bomb the kind of bombs
and roans and missiles that are being sent inced Israel
all the time. And you look at what they're doing.
You know, they've ramped it up in Yeah, they've increased
their bombings in Southern Bay Route over the past couple
of days. In the last couple of weeks, they've been
bombing in Syria. I mean, they're at this point, they
still haven't they still haven't defeated Hamas, And whenever anybody
reminds them of that, they go and they drop a
bomb on a hospital in Hamas and kill people, and
you know, kill one hundred people, and they're like, look,
we killed one hundred Homas. We killed one hundred Hamas
members right there. We're winning the war. And they're losing
this all over the place. They're they're fighting on too
many fronts and it's just hubris and Netanyahu is only
doing this to save his own ass.
Speaker 1: What they've lost is they've lost their identity, or at
least they're public persona as being histories par perennial victims.
Speaker 2: I mean, there are still some people who are just
not going to who are going to back them up
and say they can do anything they want, they can
kill as many civilians as they want, and they'll rationalize
us to say all of those civilians were you know.
I mean at this point, anybody who's rationalizing that is
just basically saying just kill them because they're brown.
Speaker 1: Not many of them are under the age of fifty though.
Speaker 2: Yeah, right, or over the age of five.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. And that's another thing, yeah, is the of
course the United States. Of course, it's the idea to
throughout the West, to enrich it with diversity. Means that
you have less support for Israel because it's hard to
play the white guilt thing with brown and black people.
Speaker 2: And also with the young people. Yeah, people just don't care.
I mean the one thing, the one thing that they
said in the author during Personality is we got to
get people to stop going to church. Well, people stop
going to church, they're not going to get that Christian Zionism. Yes.
So it's like you got Zoomer out there who were
just like, why do I need to care about Israel.
You know, I've said this before. There's no reason that
I should even know Israel exists on nine to eleven,
like after nine to eleven, up until nine to eleven.
And I'm not embarrassed to say this because I don't
think we should know. I didn't know there was a
country called Cutter. I didn't know there was a country
called the UAE. I didn't know these things existed. Why
because why why would I? Why should I? I mean
I was going through my life apolitical, just you know,
trying to survive and make money and meet a nice
girl and everything. Why should I know these things exist?
And then you know, nine to eleven was another stupid
thing that they did, turned a whole country political. Now
people start paying attention, they start reading books. I mean
I was reading Mark Weber before nine to eleven, but
that was just because I grew up in New York
and I saw this certain group and I'm like, they're
not like us, and they're really strange.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I started early nineties, when NATO didn't dissolve. I
started noticing things.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and then you know, I found I actually found
the I actually found the IHR in the back of
a magazine and like mailed a check and they sent
you like the pamphlets. That's where I started with them.
And you know, I was like, oh, oh okay. And
then but I didn't even know about the dancing Israelis
till ten years ago.
Speaker 1: Twelve years Yeah, it was was two thousand and one.
I became skeptical of Afghanistan read it wasn't it wasn't
just a punitive raid. It's like, wait, this is like
the machine building and I was I was taking more
of a Ron Paul and non interventionist blowback. Yeah things.
And then around two thousand and seven, two thousand and eight,
of all people, it was an Alex Jones video.
Speaker 2: Like I mean, used to do amazing work.
Speaker 1: It's like, whoa this is? I mean, yeah, the Building
seven thing. I was like, wait a second. You know
BBC and Jans Stanley, you know, and then I started
looking at a lot of things, and the dancing Israelies
was particularly interesting. Then yeah, then he said, oh yeah,
the Lavon affair, Oh yeah, Uss Liberty, oh King David
bombing was a false flag attack. Oh okay, there's a
pattern here.
Speaker 2: I think mine was James Corbett, who's finding a couple
of James pet.
Speaker 1: James Corbett's researchers. Yeah, back in two thousand and eight,
two thousand and nine, Yeah, twenty ten would have been Yeah,
then uh, nine eleven, that nine to eleven remember the
nine to eleven in two minutes or something he did? Yeah,
you know nine to eleven conspiracy theory. It was like
three minutes. Yeah, and you're here. Ted Olson just died
remember Ted Olson? Oh really, he passed away this week.
He's the one that actually litigated against California's ban on
gay marriage, the conservative Ted Wolson. Wow, but his member,
Barbara's and his wife was on that plane and that
reportedly hit the Pentagon.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, Tim Olson's Tim Olson's wife, right, yeah, Barbara,
Ted Olson's Barbara.
Speaker 1: Yeah, she was a Fox News mayven. You know she's
a U But I remember, uh he told he told
his very elaborate story. He called her, she called him
from the from the plane. Remember that.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Kind of odd, huh, But then it was further relief revealed.
I think in Alexander Federal Court House, the zacharais Massauri case,
remember the twentieth bomber. Yes, in the minutes of the
court or at least the transfer of the court. The
FBI admits that there were there were no there was
no phone communication in the plane. Yeah, and that's never
been reconciled. No, yeah, yeah, So why would he tell
that elaborate story? Yeah, and no one ever asked ted.
That's that court questioning went to his grave that at
least I'm not aware of his being asked that question.
And then maybe I got some Maybe there's a maybe
there's a lie there somewhere a SIA I I don't know,
but you can't reconcile the two reports. I don't know
what it means. It's just strung. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Then you have the whole flight ninety two thing where
for ninety three, Yeah, they do the whole oh, let's
roll kind of thing. We don't know that that happened.
Speaker 1: No, I don't have to reconcile everything. I'm not the
one providing a narrative. It's the people who produced the
narrative have to reconcile something, meaning I don't have to
explain everything. People who provide the narrative have to explain
their consistencies. And there's some inconsistence that are reconcilable. Lead
you believe it's a lie.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's always interesting way. Even normal people now become
so so have swallowed that so whole that they'll tell
you this story and they'll be like, oh, this is
how it happened. And you'll be like, okay, prove it.
It's like, no, you have to prove that that didn't
happen that way. No, that's not the way.
Speaker 1: That way it works. I don't have to prove a negative.
You have to prove the positive.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, if you tell me. You know, someone tells me, oh,
Wall Street is completely controlled by Jews, Okay, tell me
how and what are their names?
Speaker 1: Yes? One said that the other day is well to
find control influence. Yeah, okay, then then we're on the something. Okay,
then I'll go with you on that one.
Speaker 2: Sure. Yeah, like a total control. I don't know, I
don't know. It seems like the Bernie made off and
then you have Enron and everything. It seems like or
what are they just punishing their own? What's you know?
What's going on here?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean they don't. Total control isn't necessary. I
mean you'd think that. I mean, the way apeg acts
sometimes you think they like they grow up at one
Congress critter.
Speaker 2: For Yeah, you don't need every single one. You need
enough to you know, put you know, it's like if
you're gonna it's like the nineteen eighteen Chicago White Sox
nineteen nineteen or nineteen nineteen, was it nineteen nineteen?
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, you're talking about the World Series and the
Black Sox scandal. Yeah.
Speaker 2: All you need is like the picture the Catcher. Yeah
you need, you need like two pictures, the Catcher and
maybe the Shortstop. That's it. You're done. I mean, did
you see it?
Speaker 1: Did you see Devin Stacks program on that? No?
Speaker 2: I didn't.
Speaker 1: It's on Rosens. What's his name Rosen?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, it was uh, you know, the Heroin Dealer,
you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I can't remember what was.
Speaker 1: His name outlooking of it? Is it Rosenthal?
Speaker 2: I can't remember his name, but yeah, but it was
a but he.
Speaker 1: Did a thing on it. It's hilarious. Its hilarious. I'm
just gonna look at up here.
Speaker 2: Great that Devin can can present those in such a
funny manner too.
Speaker 1: It was it was uh yeah, the White Socks and
Snetty Reds. Back then it was the best of nine
World Series, the Best of nine Games five to three.
But oh, come on, I can that was his name.
I can't remember, not Rosenthal, some other Jewish name. Rosen
wrote a book about it. It's funny Rothstein, that's right, that's right. Yeah.
He was in the you know, Bordock Empire. Yeah, yeah,
Rothstein apparently came from a pretty accomplished Jewish family. They
weren't crooks or anything like that, but he just got
it into the crookeds. He just got into that scene.
And then he got into heroin dealing and all that.
But apparently there was a he when he's working out
the black Sack scandal thing, he gets in a deal
with this European Jewish banker and they're going to organize
a intercontinental heroin trade and they're ceiling the deal. This
is like nineteen twenty or something early. This is like
the nineteen twenty nine or something, nineteen thirty and this
Jewish guy in Europe, after they shake hands it gets
a deal. There on he's on it. He had like
a Fokker a thirty four personal plane, this German plane.
It was like a you know, like a passenger plane
of the day, and he's flying in the English Channel.
They're partying and he's drunk, and this guy walks to
go relieve himself with the bathroom and he opens the
wrong door and it falls into the English channel and
that's how he died. Who do you see? And he
does a and devin'stack is this thing? Is you know
how he does this cheap animation? Yeah, and he does.
He has this picture of this cartoon of this jew
falling to the English channel as you fall as he
goes ive. You have to see it. It's the funniest thing.
Who is this guy? Basicly Meg, make look this up here?
What was his name? He was a European houstin banker
that is English.
Speaker 2: And do we know he wasn't pushed.
Speaker 1: We don't know, actually, but he was Uh he wasn't
a rothschild. Uh well look it up. But anyway, it's
a funny story about that whole scandal. But he just
gets he just gets you. Yes, he gets an idea
of gambling and corruption of sports and all that sort
of thing. But anyway, we've digressed. So yeah, I think
I said I had you for an hour.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think we're going going on a little over
one and a half. Now, that's fine. That's fine, we
can Uh well.
Speaker 1: Okay, well we'll see next sixty days if they actually
let him get inaugurated.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, what happens if you want to if
you want to talk before then talk, you know, because
you know something is going to happen, something's going to
happen between now and then. It's definitely going to be
worthy of talking about.
Speaker 1: But af Alfred Lowenstein was his name.
Speaker 2: Oh that's right, I've heard that. Oh wow, he fell
into the English.
Speaker 1: So much for the higher IQ. I don't know. Oh man,
so Alfred Lowenstein and yeah, devons take that a whole
like three hour you know, one of his you know,
insomnia stream.
Speaker 2: Things did did the animation? What did it? Was the
face like the happy merchant face?
Speaker 1: Yes it was, Yes, it was he English? Sorry deals
off and not too long after that, uh of course. Uh,
he's Arnold Rothstein. Is is a shot in the crotch
and dies. Yeah, he didn't pay his gambling bills. Apparently,
that's what happened, was he just wouldn't pay his gambling bills. Off.
Speaker 2: I am so shocked to hear that.
Speaker 1: So he just shot him.
Speaker 2: I'm so shocked.
Speaker 1: But he's the one that put. I think he's you know,
he's a he's a big figure out just the black
sacks because he puts he sets up Myra Landska business.
You know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's it's so funny that so many people think that,
like the organized crime was Italian.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's Sicilian man, there's Sicilians man.
Speaker 2: Now now that would be uh has anybody done as
serious on that?
Speaker 1: Well, there's a book called super Mob.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Russo's books was sorry, very that's a very entertaining book
about Sidney Korshak and the Hollywood mafia, the Jews, and
and that factor is Sidney Corshak. I think it's the
one that negotiated, uh so that the Godfather could be made. Oh,
he was connected to the Chicago outfit and he was
a lawyer for for them more or less he was
he was there. They're kind of like the brains for
their Italian muscle and Chicago, but they went out to
California and he just kind of took it over because
it was so open. Okay, well, I'll let you go.
Speaker 2: Thanks, I appre I appreciate it anytime, man, Thank you
very much.
Speaker 1: I'll post it soon and I'll probably add a little
bit of this so it isn't so rambling, but you
know the end.
Speaker 2: But we're doing research in in real time.
Speaker 1: Yeah, real time research. We're two old farts forgetting names.
Speaker 2: All right, thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Take it easy.