Speaker 1: This is the other side of midnight.
Speaker 2: Running a strange program, y'all.
Speaker 1: With Walter Sterling.
Speaker 2: Lost in stays.
Speaker 1: Nature Nature.
Speaker 2: Now I work for a very unusual company in that
Speaker 2: it's owned by John and Margot Katsimatitas pronounced Katsimatitas, as
Speaker 2: Margo taught me in no uncertain terms, it's Katsimatitas. She
Speaker 2: was very clear. In fact, I'd have to say that
Speaker 2: Margot is very clear about everything, just everything. And the
Speaker 2: best thing, well, they're many best things, but among the
Speaker 2: best fringe benefits is the Red Apple Audio Networks has
Speaker 2: the most stunning breakroom in American media. There are many
Speaker 2: companies that feed you. They'll make a deal with hot
Speaker 2: and crusty, and they'll have a nice buffet twenty four
Speaker 2: hours a day because they don't want you to go outside.
Speaker 2: But the Catsimatids are grossers at root, and therefore they
Speaker 2: understand our dietary requirements better than most. Everything in the
Speaker 2: breakroom is a snack, a truly great snack. There's nothing
Speaker 2: really healthy in there. I didn't say damaging, but it's.
Speaker 2: For example, there's every type of eminem ever made, Every
Speaker 2: type of eminem you could ever want is in there
Speaker 2: mixed with every other type of mix that you could imagine,
Speaker 2: and then she upped it, she leveled up, and she
Speaker 2: started stocking tasty cakes, tasty cake products Philadelphia. If you
Speaker 2: know about tasty cakes, you know what I'm talking about,
Speaker 2: free array of tasty cake products. And therefore I consider
Speaker 2: myself a lifer. Now there's Dave Scott, a known Canadian.
Speaker 2: Are there wildfires near you, Dave.
Speaker 3: Well, the biggest wildfire that is said to me, by
Speaker 3: about twenty eight miles is about the size of about
Speaker 3: one hundred and twenty thousand football fields right now, so
Speaker 3: it is pretty big, and it continues to roar. I
Speaker 3: apologize that my voice is a little hoarse, but we've
Speaker 3: had twenty four hours a really heavy forest fire smoke here,
Speaker 3: and you know, it just doesn't taste good.
Speaker 2: Walt, No, we've suffered in the northern part of the
Speaker 2: northern part of the lower forty eight. We have suffered
Speaker 2: with that smoke very very often through the month of
Speaker 2: July and August. It burns, It makes it difficult to speak,
Speaker 2: makes it difficult to breathe, and there's nothing that we
Speaker 2: can do.
Speaker 3: Well. If Canada would learn how to put them out
Speaker 3: rather than just have a bunch of bureaucracy fires burning,
Speaker 3: we might be able to actually save that air quality
Speaker 3: a little bit more.
Speaker 2: Now, let's review what the benefit is to the Canadian
Speaker 2: bureaucracy to have wildfires. What is the benefit Number one?
Speaker 3: Employment? Number two, pushing a climate change effort politically. Number three,
Speaker 3: it makes a lot of companies money. Number four it's
Speaker 3: and I told you so to jack up prices on everything,
Speaker 3: which means more tax dollars because the companies like giving
Speaker 3: an example, when the fire first hit in a town
Speaker 3: south of me called Clinton, British Columbia, was evacuated, they
Speaker 3: bumped diesel prices up to two dollars and sixty three
Speaker 3: point nine cents a leader, which is about eleven dollars.
Speaker 3: Again Allen, Wow, wow, yeah, wow yeah.
Speaker 2: Now what about these college students? How are they involved?
Speaker 3: Well, if you look at the firefighters, they're all over town.
Speaker 3: They're heroes in our in our estimation, because I mean,
Speaker 3: putting your life on the line when you've got a
Speaker 3: you know, one thousand plus degree fire burning just ahead
Speaker 3: of you, you know, they are heroes. But the big
Speaker 3: thing about them is if you look at their age,
Speaker 3: they're all college student ages. I guess when they go
Speaker 3: back to school after Labor.
Speaker 2: Day, right, and what happens then?
Speaker 3: Usually the majority of fires have been put out.
Speaker 2: Isn't that amazing? Why does it happen every year?
Speaker 3: I'm going to use the word stupidity. I talked to
Speaker 3: someone yesterday whose husband is working on the fires, and
Speaker 3: there's a lot of standing around. We there's a lot
Speaker 3: of crews who could be out working putting out the fire,
Speaker 3: but they're waiting for orders. A lot of the fire crews.
Speaker 3: Like when we burned up here in twenty seventeen, we
Speaker 3: had fire trucks from all over the province of British
Speaker 3: Columbia coming to help, from the Vancouver area, from Vancouver Island,
Speaker 3: you know, volunteer firefighters. They were coming out because our
Speaker 3: town was very close to burning down, and up here
Speaker 3: we don't see that this year, we don't see it.
Speaker 3: I mean a helicopter looked. A helicopter carries a bag
Speaker 3: that could there's two different sized bags I believe they use.
Speaker 3: One can hold four hundred gallons of water. One can
Speaker 3: use a hold six hundred gallons of water. Yes, they
Speaker 3: can refill anywhere, but what damage are they really doing?
Speaker 3: To the fire, right, I mean by the time they
Speaker 3: by the time they drop, fly back, grab another bucket.
Speaker 2: Right, it's like a tease. Absolutely, yeah, there's no there's
Speaker 2: no impact on that. So are these Union fire crews?
Speaker 2: Is that why they're standing around just watching?
Speaker 3: I don't think they're Union fire crews. But what's happened
Speaker 3: over the time is they've created contracts with these companies
Speaker 3: who hire people to fight forest fires. And you know,
Speaker 3: back in the day, like a lot of the old
Speaker 3: timers in my town one hundred mile House, British Columbia,
Speaker 3: you know when there was a forest fire, when you
Speaker 3: live in a forestry community like I do. Back then,
Speaker 3: there's a few things that would happen. Number One, we
Speaker 3: weren't spraying round up or glycophates on the forest to
Speaker 3: kill bugs that kill evasive species. We weren't doing that.
Speaker 3: Number Two, we were also having crews go in and
Speaker 3: thin out the dead fall that has If you go
Speaker 3: in any forest, you see dead fall. They would clear
Speaker 3: out those trees. Okay, those dead fall trees. How do
Speaker 3: you think we always had firewood? Dry firewood? You know,
Speaker 3: when you go camping, you stop at the gas station,
Speaker 3: you pick up you know, a couple bags of firewood. Well,
Speaker 3: that's because it was deadfall. We had people doing that.
Speaker 3: Now there's nobody doing that. Number three is with these
Speaker 3: government contracts going on. Back in the day, there was
Speaker 3: no government contract, so the loggers would get in there.
Speaker 3: They would bulldoze in the area of trees, cut down
Speaker 3: a bunch of trees to create a fire line so
Speaker 3: that way the fire couldn't burn past that line. Now
Speaker 3: we don't do that. We wait and wait and we see.
Speaker 3: So this big fire that's south to me, they didn't
Speaker 3: get a crew on it for five days. For the
Speaker 3: first five days that was able to burn. And they're like, oh,
Speaker 3: it's not going to come over the ridge of the mountains.
Speaker 3: And guess what it did. It came over the ridge
Speaker 3: of the mountains, putting a community in potential peril. And
Speaker 3: that's where it gets ridiculous. These people are standing down.
Speaker 3: You have people in Vancouver, the majority of them have
Speaker 3: never lived in a rural community with a logging background,
Speaker 3: and here they are making decisions for people who know
Speaker 3: how to put out the fires but aren't allowed to
Speaker 3: because they don't have a government contract.
Speaker 2: So we're not going to see an end to these
Speaker 2: far as far as ruining our lives in North America
Speaker 2: at least till the end of August.
Speaker 3: Well that's my prediction, all right, that's my prediction.
Speaker 2: They've Scott, the host of Spaced Out radio broadcaster journalist
Speaker 2: updates on UAP's UFOs and mysteries.
Speaker 3: Mister Scott, we had a hat trick of bad news
Speaker 3: in the UFO world. Yeah. Number one, the speech that
Speaker 3: everybody was talking about that Donald Trump today was going
Speaker 3: to be making a speech on UFOs.
Speaker 2: Guess what, Walter, I didn't hear any speech at UFOs.
Speaker 3: No, there was none, There was none. It was all
Speaker 3: hype and no action once again. So that's disappointment number one.
Speaker 3: Disappointment number two comes from Time magazine, who actually put
Speaker 3: a UFO on the cover basically said that, hey, we
Speaker 3: need to start taking this story a little bit more seriously,
Speaker 3: which is great because Time magazine is massive. But the
Speaker 3: reporter who wrote on this story was a little bit
Speaker 3: late to the party because everything in this extremely long article,
Speaker 3: although eloquently written, was from nine years ago. The news
Speaker 3: that broke nine years ago that the New York Times
Speaker 3: article on the UFOs basically came out. He was talking
Speaker 3: about the original videos that came out in twenty seventeen,
Speaker 3: the tic TAC, the Go Faster, the gimbal videos, talking
Speaker 3: about all these interactions with UFOs, the same people who
Speaker 3: have said the exact same things for nine years in
Speaker 3: a row. Highly disappointed there was nothing updated on that.
Speaker 3: And this is a problem for the UFO world because
Speaker 3: every time we seem to take a couple of steps forward,
Speaker 3: something major happens, whether it's doctor Phil, whether it's Joe Rogan,
Speaker 3: whether it's Time magazine, that goes right back to the
Speaker 3: beginning of nine years ago, and we're all sitting there saying,
Speaker 3: what does this do to help move the subject forward?
Speaker 3: Have you not been paying attention as a journalist on
Speaker 3: what is happening today and not nine years ago? So
Speaker 3: that was disappointment number two for the hat trick. Over
Speaker 3: the UK, the British Parliament said the Ministry of Defense
Speaker 3: will no longer be looking into the UFO phenomena. According
Speaker 3: to them, there is no they're there and so they're
Speaker 3: not going to be wasting time and resources.
Speaker 2: Who who said they're not going to be wasting time
Speaker 2: on this? What organization was this?
Speaker 3: The British government?
Speaker 2: The UK government Oh they're done. The British government is
Speaker 2: done with this.
Speaker 3: They're done, got it, They're done.
Speaker 2: It's good to know.
Speaker 3: This isn't surprising though, because Commonwealth countries, okay, and way
Speaker 3: back in the day when you guys were one, I
Speaker 3: mean before you had your little treason to act there
Speaker 3: on July fourth, Yeah, seventeen seventy six.
Speaker 2: We were wrong, right, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 3: You know. One thing Commonwealth countries are very good at,
Speaker 3: Canada included, is they are very good at the old adage,
Speaker 3: if we don't talk about it, it doesn't exist. So
Speaker 3: basically what's happening within the UK now is they are
Speaker 3: pushing UFOs back under the rug. Nobody wants to deal
Speaker 3: with it. They don't want to waste their time and
Speaker 3: resources on it, and they're which basically signals they're not
Speaker 3: giving up their secrets, they are not giving up their story.
Speaker 3: And that could be very telling for what happens in
Speaker 3: North America here coming up, because, like I said, a
Speaker 3: lot of people were expecting Donald Trump to give that
Speaker 3: UFO speech today. It didn't happen, and this is what
Speaker 3: the result is. Maybe, as I've said previously on this program,
Speaker 3: that maybe just maybe this is the goal in the endgame. Overall,
Speaker 3: keep it to what happened nine years ago, and that
Speaker 3: way nobody asked questions about today, and that way it's
Speaker 3: easier to throw the secrets back under the rug, so
Speaker 3: nobody knows what's going on.
Speaker 2: How do I find you online?
Speaker 3: Easy? Space Outradio dot Com is my website. You can
Speaker 3: download my show, spaced out Radio for free on every
Speaker 3: major podcast network including Spotify, iTunes, and iHeartRadio, and of
Speaker 3: course YouTube at spaced out Radio.
Speaker 4: Thebans in space, Space Space, the other side of the.
Speaker 1: Space, Space Space.
Speaker 5: Why I grew up playing hockey, You know, I played
Speaker 5: all the way up to Junior double A.
Speaker 1: I worked in the trades.
Speaker 5: I was an elevator mechanic for twelve years. Drive a
Speaker 5: Subaru outback like they made a whole gay body forgot
Speaker 5: to turn it on.
Speaker 3: You are listening to the biggest all night show in
Speaker 3: American radio, the other side of midnight.
Speaker 2: A vital a vital news story coming up in just seconds,
Speaker 2: and you and I are going to share inspired by
Speaker 2: Lesbians in Space because originally the title of that feature,
Speaker 2: which got lost in the ozone was Lesbians in Space
Speaker 2: who wear sports bras. That was the original title. Now
Speaker 2: why was that? Because research shows that did this hour
Speaker 2: there are only three things that people want to hear
Speaker 2: about lesbians, outer space stories, and sports. I have no
Speaker 2: interest in sports, but I respect your tastes. And then
Speaker 2: I said, well, what if we combined all of those
Speaker 2: three elements, of three powerful elements into one, and we
Speaker 2: have lesbians in space who wear sports bras. Tonight, you
Speaker 2: and I are going to discuss an amazing story about
Speaker 2: sports spras. In new cycling cheat scandal, sportspras were introduced
Speaker 2: into a cycling competition and the result was cheating, cheating.
Speaker 2: The other side of Midnight Red Apple Audio Networks with
Speaker 2: Walter Sterling.
Speaker 1: The other side of midnight with Walter Sterling. It's the
Speaker 1: other side of midnight with Walter Sterling, the.
Speaker 5: Other side of midnight, the right side of midnight.
Speaker 2: Walter Sterle is on the air up, bend down the
Speaker 2: down on.
Speaker 5: Powerful, powerful stations with fifty kilowat.
Speaker 2: Smile, Yeah, midnight misfits A no that Walter is always right.
Speaker 1: It's the the.
Speaker 3: Other side of midnight.
Speaker 2: Hello. By the way, my phone screen or computer has
Speaker 2: decided this is a good time for it to do
Speaker 2: its security update. Therefore, I have a blank screen, but
Speaker 2: nothing to worry about, because I have a more important story.
Speaker 2: You ready. Cycling's newest performance enhancer isn't a syringe, but
Speaker 2: a sports bra. Accusations of padded bras that can give
Speaker 2: women's Tour de France competitors and aerodynamic advantage are flying
Speaker 2: through the cycling world. Dutch News, of course, the Dutch
Speaker 2: The Dutch news outlet has said several complaints have been
Speaker 2: filed this year about female cyclists allegedly exploiting their breast
Speaker 2: size by faking a larger cup to use more padding
Speaker 2: in their bras during time trials. A professor of aerodynamics
Speaker 2: at the University of Scotland concluded in a study that
Speaker 2: a rounder chest has an advantage as it helps reduce
Speaker 2: aerodynamic drag through cheat chest faring. Chest faring chest firing
Speaker 2: is an object that is placed inside a jersey or
Speaker 2: skin suit to reduce aerodynamic drag and smooth airflow around
Speaker 2: the body. This is a scandal. You and I have
Speaker 2: discussed the power of sports bras for many years. The
Speaker 2: power of sports bras lesbians in space who wear sportspras
Speaker 2: in the mind of most men. The first time we
Speaker 2: heard the phrase SPORTSPRA. We viewed it as a viable competition.
Speaker 2: The amount of competing that you have done to get
Speaker 2: into bras of any type is fairly remarkable and greatly uncredited. Finally,
Speaker 2: it was labeled properly. There are sports bras, but it's
Speaker 2: not about you getting into her bra with consent. It's
Speaker 2: about women wearing a special type of bra when they
Speaker 2: participate in sports. I don't know what those spras are
Speaker 2: that they wear in the WNBA. I believe they're overdone.
Speaker 2: I believe there's too much bra involved in the WNBA.
Speaker 2: But now in cycling competition, the bigger the bra, the better.
Speaker 2: The bigger the chest, the better. It helps them aerodynamically
Speaker 2: win cycle races. How much would this help them win
Speaker 2: if they go from an A to a D? Are
Speaker 2: they guaranteed to win? Yes, you're guaranteed to win. But
Speaker 2: are they guaranteed to win if they go from an
Speaker 2: A to a D? I think it's a fair question.
Speaker 2: But that's the big news in the world of cycling. Now,
Speaker 2: what if they decided to resolve this? How have they
Speaker 2: decided to resolve this? Let's see this very important piece
Speaker 2: of sports reporting. In complaints made to the u u S,
Speaker 2: I don't know what that is. In complaints made to
Speaker 2: the official people, let's see padded brought. Oh oh, oh,
Speaker 2: here's a job for you. In complaints made to the UCI,
Speaker 2: teams want female padded brought inspectors to come in and
Speaker 2: check the riders in a closed tent to ensure that
Speaker 2: that they are not hiding anything in their bras or
Speaker 2: under their arrow clothing. The Tour de France has long
Speaker 2: dealt with cheating controversy, long dealt with blood doping, having
Speaker 2: previously infiltrated the cycling world. The Tour de France Femmes,
Speaker 2: which started August first, runs through August ninth. They want
Speaker 2: to have inspectors in a tent by the starting lines
Speaker 2: to make sure that their bras are not overwhelming, that
Speaker 2: their bras are not rigging the results. And yet, in
Speaker 2: every other aspect of life, a woman's bra does rig
Speaker 2: the results, doesn't it in every other aspect of life?
Speaker 2: Job interviews, Oh no, no, we're equal, dating, jealousy, competing
Speaker 2: with other women for god knows what. But now the
Speaker 2: only honest place that this is going to be dealt with,
Speaker 2: is in the Tour de Fron cycling competition women's cycling competition,
Speaker 2: where they actually want to have inspectors in a tent
Speaker 2: to review this. I know you want that job. There's
Speaker 2: no reason you can't have that job. I'm Walter Sterling.
Speaker 2: Lets you and I talk at eight hundred eight four
Speaker 2: eight nine two two two. Eight hundred eighty four eight
Speaker 2: nine two two two. You heard this terrible story about
Speaker 2: Perez Hilton, right, Perez Hilton is this online video gossip columnist,
Speaker 2: and for a long time I didn't understand what that was. Well,
Speaker 2: it turns out Perez Hilton is a guy, and Perez
Speaker 2: Hilton is a is a gossip columnist so on sort
Speaker 2: of a TMZ scale, reports on celebrities, makes videos reporting
Speaker 2: on it. I always thought that he was a little nuts,
Speaker 2: starting with his nom de plume. I'm speaking French now
Speaker 2: that we're worried about the Tour de France. Well, anyway,
Speaker 2: he's a guy, Paris Hilton, and Perez Hilton is a
Speaker 2: guy who has four children. He has four children and
Speaker 2: in the house. Those four children were in the house
Speaker 2: when Perez Hilton decided to knife himself. And this week
Speaker 2: he knifed himself. Fortunately there were enough paramedics nearby, enough
Speaker 2: cops nearby that were able to get there in time
Speaker 2: to get him to a hospital. I don't know what
Speaker 2: the result is, but I do know that I can't
Speaker 2: imagine anything more selfish. Suicide is selfish, but suicide with
Speaker 2: your kids in the house whole different level. There are
Speaker 2: no words for doing that to a child. Can you
Speaker 2: imagine doing that to a child? Of course you can't.
Speaker 2: It's because you're a decent human being. It's about thirty
Speaker 2: minutes past the hour Walter Sterling on the air in
Speaker 2: Chicago on the Great wg N.
Speaker 5: While for Sterling, the biggest all night show in American race,
Speaker 5: you and.
Speaker 2: I get to talk about Tartaria. Tartaria was a country
Speaker 2: that existed primarily in Central Asia, and it was on
Speaker 2: every map in eighteen hundred. Every map in eighteen hundred
Speaker 2: there was Tartaria about the size of China, and by
Speaker 2: nineteen hundred it had disappeared, not through any edict, not
Speaker 2: through a war, not through legislation. It just started to disappear.
Speaker 2: And part of the reasons started to disappear is through
Speaker 2: much of Tartaria there were violent weather events, including mud floods.
Speaker 2: Mud ran down the streets like a river, thick, horrible mud,
Speaker 2: burying buildings up up to the second floor, killing people
Speaker 2: because it came through fast, destroying city. After the elites
Speaker 2: of the day went to those cities and bought up
Speaker 2: as much of the land as they possibly could for
Speaker 2: penny an acre. There was very little paperwork, very little
Speaker 2: official selling. They just went in and took it, and
Speaker 2: in the process they wanted to get some things changed.
Speaker 2: One of the traits of Tartaria around the world, outposts
Speaker 2: and the country was that Tartarians had developed a way
Speaker 2: to capture electricity energy power from the ether, from the air,
Speaker 2: and through lay lines in the earth. Well, this was magnificent,
Speaker 2: This was incredible, and we're gonna learn about some of this,
Speaker 2: how the free electricity worked, and what happened to it.
Speaker 4: In seventeen ninety three, the French government renamed multiple major
Speaker 4: cities simultaneously. But the French government in seventeen ninety three
Speaker 4: is a committee of men meeting in Paris in the
Speaker 4: middle of a civil war in a country without railways,
Speaker 4: sending dispatches by horse. I want to start with a
Speaker 4: date September one, eighteen fifty nine. That's the date they
Speaker 4: give you. The date the sky turned red over North America,
Speaker 4: over Europe, over Australia. The date telegraph operators reported their
Speaker 4: equipment sparking and firing without any power source. The date
Speaker 4: that auroras, those ghostly ribbons of light typically confined to
Speaker 4: the Arctic Circle, were spotted over Cuba, over the Bahamas,
Speaker 4: over the mountains of Columbia, and the flatlands of Queensland.
Speaker 4: The official explanation is elegant, almost suspiciously so. A British
Speaker 4: astronomer named Richard Carrington was observing the Sun through a
Speaker 4: telescope at his private observatory in Redhill, Surrey. He witnessed,
Speaker 4: he claims, a blinding white flash erupting from the solar surface,
Speaker 4: a coronal mass ejection of unprecedented scale, charged particles, billions
Speaker 4: of tons of magnetized plasma hurtling toward Earth at millions
Speaker 4: of miles per hour. They arrived in approximately seventeen hours.
Speaker 4: They struck Earth's magnetosphere. The magnetosphere in turn induced electrical
Speaker 4: currents in every conductive material on the planet's surface. That's
Speaker 4: the story. It's clean, it's scientific. It's been repeated in
Speaker 4: textbooks since roughly the turn of the twentieth century. But
Speaker 4: the deeper I looked, and I mean really looked past
Speaker 4: the textbook summaries and the Wikipedia entries and the reassuring
Speaker 4: diagrams of solar wind, the more a different picture began
Speaker 4: to emerge. Because here's the thing about the official explanation.
Speaker 4: It explains the lights in the sky beautifully, It explains
Speaker 4: the disrupted telegraph lines. It gives us a mechanism, a cause,
Speaker 4: a reassuring framework from the world of physics. What it
Speaker 4: doesn't explain, what it can't explain, and what nobody seems
Speaker 4: to want to talk about, is everything else that was
Speaker 4: happening on the ground in eighteen fifty nine. What emerged
Speaker 4: is not a picture of a random natural event absorbed
Speaker 4: by a primitive technological world, but a picture of a
Speaker 4: world that was, in some ways far less primitive than
Speaker 4: we've been taught to believe, a world with energy infrastructure
Speaker 4: built into its very architecture, a world that may have
Speaker 4: been running on something we don't have a name for anymore,
Speaker 4: And a world that, after September eighteen fifty nine, started
Speaker 4: systematically removing the evidence. What if the sun was just
Speaker 4: the cover story let's start with what we know, or rather,
Speaker 4: let's start with what we're told we know. The Carrington
Speaker 4: event is described even today as the law lar just
Speaker 4: geomagnetic storm in recorded history. Carrington, himself, a wealthy English amateur,
Speaker 4: was sketching sunspots through his telescope when he observed a
Speaker 4: brilliant white flash. Less than eighteen hours later, the storm arrived.
Speaker 4: Telegraph systems across Europe and North America failed simultaneously. Some
Speaker 4: caught fire, some reportedly continued to operate even after operators
Speaker 4: disconnected the batteries, drawing current directly from the charged atmosphere itself.
Speaker 4: That last detail. Hold on to that detail, because here's
Speaker 4: the question no one seems to ask. Why were the
Speaker 4: telegraphs the only systems that responded to this surge of
Speaker 4: atmospheric energy. Think about that for a moment. We're told
Speaker 4: the atmosphere was so electrically charged that metal wires strung
Speaker 4: between poles, copper lines, rudimentary insulations, simple circuits were not
Speaker 4: only disrupted, but were powered energized by the geomagnetic event
Speaker 4: to the point of autonomous function.
Speaker 3: And yet.
Speaker 4: Look at the rooftops of virtually every major city on
Speaker 4: Earth in the mid nineteenth century. Look at what was
Speaker 4: up there. Metal rods, spires, ornate copper tip lightning conductors,
Speaker 4: elaborate finials on public buildings, on churches, on train stations,
Speaker 4: on grand hotels, on government buildings, on academic institutions. These
Speaker 4: structures were everywhere. They were identical in their basic configuration,
Speaker 4: across cities that had no reason to coordinate their architectural choices. Paris, London,
Speaker 4: Saint Petersburg, New York, Chicago, Buenos Aires, Bombay, Shanghai. The
Speaker 4: same motif, the same vertical metal element, the same connection
Speaker 4: to the sky. This raises a simple but critical question,
Speaker 4: what exactly were all those rods and spires for? The
Speaker 4: official answer is lightning protection. Benjamin Franklin. The lightning rod
Speaker 4: protection from electrical storm, simple, elegant, rational, and for a
Speaker 4: single copper spike above a barn in rural Pennsylvania. I
Speaker 4: might accept that. But the deeper I went, the more
Speaker 4: the lightning explanation started to collapse.
Speaker 2: You know what he's talking about. That on the farmhouses,
Speaker 2: the barns, the cathedrals, the churches built before nineteen hundred,
Speaker 2: built before nineteen twenty, they had lightning rods about every
Speaker 2: twenty feet along the roofline of these buildings, on top
Speaker 2: of the spires of these buildings, and we were told
Speaker 2: those were lightning rods, except there's still lightning and those
Speaker 2: rods are not put on new buildings. They in fact
Speaker 2: were not lightning rods. What they did was capture ether,
Speaker 2: captured energy from space, captured energy from the ground, sent
Speaker 2: it through an elaborate series of copper tubing in these homes.
Speaker 2: In the walls of these homes homes, the copper would
Speaker 2: heat up. That's how the homes were heated. And then
Speaker 2: they gathered in what looked like a fireplace to you
Speaker 2: and me, but it was not a fireplace. It was
Speaker 2: a gathering point for this energy that could then be
Speaker 2: redistributed through the house for hot water, for cooking, for heat.
Speaker 2: That's what it was. Because if you were to look
Speaker 2: at those fireplaces in these mansions built in eighteen ten,
Speaker 2: eighteen fifty, eighteen seventy five, if you don't look in
Speaker 2: those fireplaces, what would you see. You would see no
Speaker 2: carbon residue, You would see no carbon residue, you would
Speaker 2: see nothing that indicated that wood had been burned in there,
Speaker 2: nothing in there that would indicate that coal had been
Speaker 2: burned in there, because it wasn't. Instead, it was a
Speaker 2: gathering point. Remember those fireplaces had big thick, heavy iron
Speaker 2: plates on the front and the back, the front and
Speaker 2: the back, those are capacitors. Those gathered the energy, aided
Speaker 2: in the redistribution of the energy, helped turn it into heat.
Speaker 2: Those heated up turned it into heat, hot water energy.
Speaker 2: Now why don't we have those? It worked fine, they
Speaker 2: worked really well. In fact, there's nothing draftier or lousier
Speaker 2: than a home that has to be heated with wood,
Speaker 2: with carbon, with coal. It is a terrible way to
Speaker 2: do it. That isn't how those mansions were heated. That
Speaker 2: isn't how the Vanderbilt mansion in New York City was heated.
Speaker 2: It was heated with ether, It was heated with ley
Speaker 2: Line energy, heated with the copper wires, the copper tubing
Speaker 2: through the walls. We've had plumbers on this show who
Speaker 2: talk about how they, when working with old homes, would
Speaker 2: tear open the walls around those fireplaces, and that's what
Speaker 2: they found. They found a tremendous amount of copper tubing,
Speaker 2: not for plumbing, but for heat, not for hot water,
Speaker 2: not for traditional plumbing. But for the plumbing of heat.
Speaker 2: I believe that one of the weirdest things about our
Speaker 2: energy today always struck me as odd, Like what really,
Speaker 2: if you have trouble with your gas line, who do
Speaker 2: you call? You call a plumber? Why do I call
Speaker 2: a plumber to fix gas? When you install a new stove,
Speaker 2: a new range that's gas powered, you call a plumber.
Speaker 2: What I thought they just dealt with water. Well, no,
Speaker 2: what they dealt with and what they were trained with
Speaker 2: for two hundred years, was how to deal with copper
Speaker 2: tubing and how do we get gas from the gas
Speaker 2: company copper tubing. Plumbers have two hundred and fifty years
Speaker 2: of experience in dealing with that copper tubing when it's
Speaker 2: relative to heat and energy. But it started with the ethernet.
Speaker 2: It started not the ethernet, with the ether from the air.
Speaker 2: Until nineteen hundred, ether was on the periodic table. Ether
Speaker 2: was on the periodic table, and then around nineteen hundred
Speaker 2: it disappeared, disappeared from the periodic table. All of this
Speaker 2: is amazing, But why did this happen? Why did it happen?
Speaker 2: It happened because the elites did not want it to continue.
Speaker 2: Why didn't the elites wanted to to not continue. Well,
Speaker 2: we'll talk about that coming up in just seconds. You
Speaker 2: have a cut in there called Grand Canyon. I want
Speaker 2: you to look for the cut in there called Grand
Speaker 2: Canyon or something canyon. Would you do that? I wish
Speaker 2: I could call a number, but that's just impossible. I'm
Speaker 2: Walter Sterling. This is the other side of Night the
Speaker 2: mystery we also wanted to discuss. We'll get back to
Speaker 2: the mystery of Ether, but we also want to discuss
Speaker 2: the incredible mystery of the Grand Canyon.
Speaker 5: Today, I am at the north rim of the Grand Canyon.
Speaker 5: I'm here because somebody sent me an article for this
Speaker 5: person claims this is an underground base. But I'm just
Speaker 5: as curious as everyone else. At least maybe we can
Speaker 5: solve one mystery of the Grand Canyon. That's why I
Speaker 5: came out here to see what we can find. If
Speaker 5: it really is an ancient underground alien base, we know
Speaker 5: where this thing is. Hello, I'm Jeff at the Track Planner.
Speaker 2: Today.
Speaker 5: I am at the north rim of the Grand Canyon
Speaker 5: trying to solve a mystery. I'm here because somebody sent
Speaker 5: me an article from unilad Am I saying that right.
Speaker 5: So what is unilad. Unilad is a website that is
Speaker 5: a major youth platform for breaking news and relatable viral content.
Speaker 5: Unilad is based in the UK, and I think they
Speaker 5: have offices in New York. Just by visiting Unilad's website,
Speaker 5: you can see how they creatively market their titles and
Speaker 5: pictures to grab attention and get clicks like this article
Speaker 5: that was sent to me. So what does this unilad
Speaker 5: article say? The article starts out with this an ancient
Speaker 5: doorway spotted in the Grand Canyon using Google Earth as
Speaker 5: conspiracy theorists convinced it's a sign that aliens are real.
Speaker 5: Here is bona fide proof that aliens exist, and they've
Speaker 5: been leaving behind doorways carved into the very ground itself.
Speaker 5: As for what lies beneath the mysterious door, we don't know,
Speaker 5: but we can have a lot of fun speculating, and
Speaker 5: we sure did have fun speculating Mongolians, Chinese, Egyptian, you know.
Speaker 5: Temple entrance a secret stairway, a temple sponsored by the
Speaker 5: Smithsonian underground alien base, Romans building fords here. The article
Speaker 5: doesn't talk about specifically where the entrance is, but it's
Speaker 5: actually right here in your point Imperial just below it.
Speaker 5: This person claims on UNILAD this is an alien base,
Speaker 5: and so obviously that caught my attention. I came all
Speaker 5: the way out here to find out for myself, because
Speaker 5: these people don't post themselves hiking to these places, and
Speaker 5: there's no answers. There never will be answers for a
Speaker 5: lot of this stuff because most of it's just so remote.
Speaker 5: But this one we can actually see use binoculars, and
Speaker 5: unfortunately Keny's the drone on National Parkland. But at least
Speaker 5: maybe we can solve one mystery of the Grand Canyon.
Speaker 5: So let's go. Before setting out, I wondered how I
Speaker 5: would get there. The terrain looks steep and likely inaccessible.
Speaker 5: Consulting a map, I plotted a route that would allow
Speaker 5: me to hike to a vantage point directly across from
Speaker 5: the entrance. From there, I plan to use binoculars to
Speaker 5: get a closer look. I live pretty close to the
Speaker 5: Grand Canyon, so it was easy for me to make
Speaker 5: a day trip out of this mystery. So I'm here
Speaker 5: at the guard station to the north Rim entrance station.
Speaker 5: Can't wait, I'm getting closer. So we're gonna see what
Speaker 5: all this weird stuff is. Is it aliens?
Speaker 2: Is it some portal to the universe?
Speaker 5: I don't know.
Speaker 2: We're gonna find out soon.
Speaker 5: Enough messing around, it was time to figure out where
Speaker 5: that secret ancient Egyptian alien entrance was located. So supposedly
Speaker 5: that entrance is right below me, so I'm gonna circle
Speaker 5: around and get a view of it from this other side.
Speaker 4: By the economic logic of extraction, exposure is destruction. The
Speaker 4: hope he Elders who declined to discuss the tunnels in
Speaker 4: the years before and after nineteen oh nine were not
Speaker 4: protecting a secret for its own sake. They were protecting
Speaker 4: an archive, a physical record placed in the most inaccessible
Speaker 4: terrain in North America, maintained by a tradition of silence
Speaker 4: that had for centuries successfully kept it intact. In the
Speaker 4: spring of nineteen o nine, an explorer floating through the
Speaker 4: Grand Canyon noticed something that should not have been there.
Speaker 4: It was not the cave that caught his attention. The
Speaker 4: canyon contains thousands of caves. It was the iron, more
Speaker 4: than a thousand feet above the Colorado River, fixed into
Speaker 4: the cliff face itself. Was what he later described as
Speaker 4: an iron fitted entrance in a place where no entrance
Speaker 4: should have existed at all. The climb took hours. What
Speaker 4: waited at the top kept people arguing for more than
Speaker 4: a century. According to the report published weeks later, the
Speaker 4: passage behind the door led into an underground complex containing
Speaker 4: copper weapons, sealed grain stores, carved chambers, and human remains,
Speaker 4: unlike anything the explorer had expected to find in Arizona.
Speaker 4: The strange part is not that the story was printed.
Speaker 4: The strange part is that after nineteen oh nine, almost
Speaker 4: everything connected to it seemed to vanish, except the newspaper
Speaker 4: that printed it. The expedition records vanished, the artifacts vanished,
Speaker 4: the follow up investigation vanished. Only the canyon remained, and,
Speaker 4: according to Hopi traditions recorded long before the newspaper story existed,
Speaker 4: some places beneath the canyon were left sealed for a reason.
Speaker 4: Tonight we're looking at the iron Door, the explorers who
Speaker 4: opened it, and the question that has followed the Grand
Speaker 4: Canyon ever since. What exactly did they wake up in
Speaker 4: nineteen o nine. Oh By the spring of nineteen oh eight,
Speaker 4: ge Kincaid had already spent months alone on the Colorado River.
Speaker 4: His assignment was simple enough on paper. Follow the river
Speaker 4: record the terrain document anything useful for future surveys. The
Speaker 4: problem with the Grand Canon is that it does not
Speaker 4: behave like paper distances lie. Cliffs that look climbable from
Speaker 4: the river become walls when you reach them. Shadows hide
Speaker 4: entire ledge systems for most of the day. There are
Speaker 4: places inside the canyon where two people can stand less
Speaker 4: than a mile apart and never know the other exists.
Speaker 4: Kincaid understood this better than most men of his time,
Speaker 4: because he was seeing the canyon from the only angle
Speaker 4: that mattered from the water, According to the Arizona gazettea
Speaker 4: count somewhere in the Marble Canyon section. He noticed an
Speaker 4: unusual discolouration high above the river on the north wall.
Speaker 4: Not a cave opening, not from below at least. What
Speaker 4: caught his attention was the way the morning light reflected
Speaker 4: from the cliff. The surface appeared smoother than the surrounding rock,
Speaker 4: as though part of the wall had once been cut
Speaker 4: rather than broken from the river. It looked unnatural enough
Speaker 4: to justify a closer look. That decision changed the direction
Speaker 4: of the entire expedition. He secured the boat and started climbing.
Speaker 4: The newspaper account estimated the entrance sat roughly fourteen hundred
Speaker 4: feet above the Colorado River. Anyone familiar with the Grand
Speaker 4: Canyon immediately understands what that means. This was not hiking,
Speaker 4: This was not scrambling. This was exposure loose rock, narrow ledges,
Speaker 4: sections where one mistake would send a climber all the
Speaker 4: way back to the river floor. Even today, with modern
Speaker 4: equipment and established climbing routes, sections of the north Wall
Speaker 4: remained dangerous enough that rescue teams regularly refused recovery operations
Speaker 4: until conditions improve. Kincaid was making the ascent alone in
Speaker 4: nineteen oh eight. Hours later he reached the opening, and,
Speaker 4: according to the account, the first thing he saw was
Speaker 4: the reason this story survived at all. The entrance did
Speaker 4: not look natural. The gazette described it as fitted with iron,
Speaker 4: not an iron gate, not a wooden door, reinforced with metal.
Speaker 4: Iron worked directly into the entrance itself, as though whoever
Speaker 4: used the site had wanted to strengthen, protect, or possibly
Speaker 4: seal whatever lay behind it. That detail changes the entire story.
Speaker 4: A cave is geology, an iron doorway is intention. An
Speaker 4: iron doorway means tools, metal working, planning, labour. It means
Speaker 4: somebody reached this cliff before Kincaid did and expected somebody
Speaker 4: else to arrive after them. That is not how caves happen.
Speaker 4: That is how entrances happen, and entrances imply occupants. Kincaid
Speaker 4: entered with a lantern, expecting a chamber. Instead, he found
Speaker 4: a passage extending deep into the canyon wall itself. The
Speaker 4: floor was level, the ceiling remained high enough to walk comfortably.
Speaker 4: The air was dry still. Older explorers often described ancient
Speaker 4: caves by smell before sight, because sealed spaces carry their
Speaker 4: own atmosphere. This place apparently did not smell abandoned. It
Speaker 4: smelled preserved. As he moved deeper, side chambers began appearing
Speaker 4: at regular intervals along the corridor, not random hollows, rooms
Speaker 4: placed where rooms should be placed if somebody had planned them.
Speaker 4: By the time Kincaid reached the first major chamber, he
Speaker 4: had already stopped thinking like a surveyor. Because surveyors mapped landscapes,
Speaker 4: they do not expect to find architecture hidden inside them.
Speaker 4: And somewhere in the darkness ahead of him sat the
Speaker 4: object that convinced him this discovery was bigger than anything
Speaker 4: he could investigate alone, not gold, not treasure, something much
Speaker 4: more dangerous than treasure. Evidence enough evidence that his next
Speaker 4: decision was not whether to continue exploring, It was whether
Speaker 4: to leave the canyon and tell someone what he had found.
Speaker 4: The first chamber looked exactly like what Kincaid expected to
Speaker 4: find in a cave system, bare stone, dust, natural walls
Speaker 4: shaped by water and time. Then he stepped into the
Speaker 4: second chamber, and the expedition stopped being geology. According to
Speaker 4: the Arizona Gazette, a count the walls inside the complex
Speaker 4: did not follow the irregular patterns normally found in limestone caves.
Speaker 4: The corners were too deliberate. The passageways met each other
Speaker 4: at angles that suggested planning rather than erosion. Some chambers
Speaker 4: appeared to have been placed at regular intervals along the
Speaker 4: main corridor, as though the entire complex had been designed
Speaker 4: before the first section was ever excavated. Kincaid later described
Speaker 4: a layout as extending far deeper into the cliff than
Speaker 4: he had expected possible. The main passage reportedly continued hundreds
Speaker 4: of feet into the canyon wall. Smaller rooms opened on
Speaker 4: both side sides. Some were empty, others were not. The
Speaker 4: first objects he reportedly encountered were storage vessels, large jars,
Speaker 4: some sealed, some broken, several still containing what appeared to
Speaker 4: be remnants of grain preserved by the dry air of
Speaker 4: the canyon interior. That detail alone creates problems. Storage implies planning.
Speaker 4: Planning implies permanence. Nobody builds food storage for a temporary
Speaker 4: shelter fourteen hundred feet above a river unless they expect
Speaker 4: people to remain there for a very long time. Further
Speaker 4: inside came tools, copper implements, blades, points, objects whose exact
Speaker 4: purpose Kincaid apparently could not identify. The important detail was
Speaker 4: not what they were. The important detail was where they were.
Speaker 4: This was Arizona inside the ground canyon in nineteen oh nine.
Speaker 4: Nobody expected to discover worked metal hidden inside an inaccessible
Speaker 4: underground complex in the American Southwest. The find was strange
Speaker 4: enough that Kincaid reportedly contacted the Smithsonian almost immediately after
Speaker 4: returning from the expedition. Then came the objects that transformed
Speaker 4: the story from unusual archaeology into something much larger. Metal tablets,
Speaker 4: thin sheets bearing symbols that Kincaid could not read and
Speaker 4: could not compare with any writing system familiar to him.
Speaker 4: The Gazette a Count never published the symbols, no drawings survive,
Speaker 4: no photographs were ever released. The entire existence of the
Speaker 4: tablets rests on the testimony of the men who allegedly
Speaker 4: saw them.
Speaker 1: The Other Side of Midnight with Walter Sterling The Other
Speaker 1: Side of Midnight with Walter Sterling.
Speaker 5: Talking.
Speaker 2: Wel the Other Side of Midnight Terry in New Jersey,
Speaker 2: Welcome to the Other Side of Midnight. Hello Terry.
Speaker 6: Walter. Your show is magnifico and in the Latin term magnificous,
Speaker 6: unbelievable show.
Speaker 2: Are you on a speaker? Are you on a speaker? Terry?
Speaker 2: Oh no, I am not doing a speaker. Now you
Speaker 2: sound like you're not on a speaker. You shifted quickly.
Speaker 6: Well to the other show is fabulous. Also, when they
Speaker 6: built houses maybe seventy five years ago, one hundred years ago,
Speaker 6: they weren't really putting the right They weren't really doing insulation.
Speaker 6: I would say one hundred years ago they probably infancy
Speaker 6: was you know, insulation, And then after World War Two
Speaker 6: they started catching on with insulation, but they were very
Speaker 6: skimpy and cheap on the insulation, and that's it, just
Speaker 6: because because oil and coal and wood was all cheap
Speaker 6: back then, and they figured people could buy much as
Speaker 6: they want and they'll make money. And then when we
Speaker 6: had the oil embargoes and the oil prices of the
Speaker 6: nineteen seventies, then you saw the oil prices go through
Speaker 6: the roof. I know there are people in the audience
Speaker 6: who drove cars back then, heated their houses, and they
Speaker 6: felt that pinch during the seventies. And I just feel
Speaker 6: that they just turned the Middle East oil producers into
Speaker 6: multi billionaires and they know they could play with us.
Speaker 6: Like I ran I really doesn't care that they are
Speaker 6: navy's in the bottom of the ocean, because after the
Speaker 6: war is over, the oil will flow and they'll buy
Speaker 6: a new navy from the Soviets like they did the
Speaker 6: last time, and now the Chinese will help them out.
Speaker 6: So they couldn't care less if you put their air force,
Speaker 6: you ground it permanently. They're gonna buy planes and jets
Speaker 6: from Soviet from Soviet Russia and from China too. They're
Speaker 6: going to be supplied, so as that oil flows, they
Speaker 6: become multi trillionaires again. And I'm just fascinated by your show,
Speaker 6: because the other night I heard you mentioned Darky killed
Speaker 6: get Ellen. She's the only one who ever interviewed Jack Ruby.
Speaker 6: She did it twice. She interviewed him, and she did
Speaker 6: let onto people say that she was going to break
Speaker 6: the Kennedy case.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we covered that when she said that, you know
Speaker 2: she went to bed, and yes, she went to bed
Speaker 2: and didn't wake up.
Speaker 6: Weeks weeks she got the same treatment. I believe both
Speaker 6: of them were helped along the lines.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I believe both of them were murdered. Thank you
Speaker 2: very much for the call. I appreciate it. Walter Sterling
Speaker 2: at eight hundred eight four eight nine two two two.
Speaker 2: The show is the Other Side of Midnight from the
Speaker 2: Red Apple Audio Networks