Speaker 1: Top lots of productions. Oh Way, Jose.
Speaker 2: The following footage proves beyond any doubt that the tanks
Speaker 2: intentionally set the house on fire. It proves that the
Speaker 2: branch Davidians were murdered. You can see that this tank
Speaker 2: has a gas jet on the front that shoots fire.
Speaker 2: You can also see the fire quite plainly. The tank
Speaker 2: goes into the house twice and each time as it
Speaker 2: backs out, the fire at the gas jets is plainly visible.
Speaker 3: We must all do more to recognize and look for
Speaker 3: the early warning signals that deeply troubled young people send.
Speaker 1: Good morning, Welcome to the No Way Jose podcast. This
Speaker 1: is the Morning Dump. I am your host, Jose Agelei Song.
Speaker 1: It's May thirtieth, a kind of rainy Friday morning where
Speaker 1: I'm at Miss piss Pour raining a little bit ago.
Speaker 1: It's cool down now. It's kind of been a little
Speaker 1: bit of a saving grace because currently my e C
Speaker 1: is broken, just broke last night, had a guy come out,
Speaker 1: so it has to get apart. So yeah, has to suffer.
Speaker 1: When almost June with no AC overnight, not so bad.
Speaker 1: We have we have some AC units, so but with
Speaker 1: them in the main house right now. So I was
Speaker 1: very very close to doing this with my shirt off.
Speaker 1: My daughter said I was not allowed to. She's like,
Speaker 1: you can't do that, Dad, that's weird. So I'm we're
Speaker 1: in a shirt for you guys, although maybe some of you,
Speaker 1: the ladies out there, the two of you, might might
Speaker 1: wish it was otherwise. But uh yeah, with that, I'm
Speaker 1: probably gonna try to keep this a little bit shorter today.
Speaker 1: I say that, but there's plenty to go over, so
Speaker 1: I don't. I'll do my best. So if I do
Speaker 1: seem like I'm running through these topics, it's because I'm
Speaker 1: probably am. Although I'll be honest, I may still end
Speaker 1: up just lingering way too long as I do. Uh
Speaker 1: So we'll see. I'll try to move through these topics
Speaker 1: fairly quick because uh yeah, I got a lot of
Speaker 1: stuff going on, but I just couldn't. I couldn't. I
Speaker 1: couldn't go another day without doing one of these. And
Speaker 1: we're about to go into the weekend. I missed yesterday
Speaker 1: because I had to pick up a shift. So you know,
Speaker 1: I worked yesterday because I have a real job, real ish, yes,
Speaker 1: you know, work part time, maybe pick up shifts here
Speaker 1: and there, and so yeah, I do. I gotta get
Speaker 1: out of here, so I gotta get out of your
Speaker 1: reasonable time, so we'll see. Uh. I had a point. Oh,
Speaker 1: I remember what I was getting at, but there was
Speaker 1: a ton of stuff that happened yesterday, so I just
Speaker 1: couldn't justify. I almost just didn't even do an episode
Speaker 1: a day. But I was like, man, a lot of
Speaker 1: stuff happened even yesterday, and I was like, there's no
Speaker 1: way I can go through the weekend. And it's like,
Speaker 1: I have way too much going on this weekend, not
Speaker 1: gonna build a weekend up. So it's like I'd have
Speaker 1: to go all the way till the next week. And
Speaker 1: it's like all these things, a lot of these things
Speaker 1: that are super important stuff are gonna be memory hold
Speaker 1: by then, so I really need to get one in.
Speaker 1: So here I am. We'll get it in, but probably
Speaker 1: a little shorter. I'll try to keep it under an
Speaker 1: hour and a half. The goal here is probably closer
Speaker 1: to an hour. We'll see.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: I don't know best intentions though they tend to fall
Speaker 1: apart sometimes. But I see some of y'all in here.
Speaker 1: See see Eddie Graham, Scotti, Mojuan, I see somebody else
Speaker 1: but let's uh while we wait for more more people
Speaker 1: to roll in here and be part of the live experience.
Speaker 1: I do want to take a moment to remind you,
Speaker 1: guys of today's episode's brought to you by our friends
Speaker 1: over at a Doh shavec Try that razor, burn that irritation,
Speaker 1: those ingrown hairs, because that come from those multi blade cartridges.
Speaker 1: This is the way to go the go back to
Speaker 1: the single blades safety raisor go back to the ways
Speaker 1: of old, just like your grandpa used to shave with
Speaker 1: that single blade safety raisor. It's a give you a
Speaker 1: lot smoother shave, it's a lot better for your skin,
Speaker 1: it's a lot easier on your wallet. It's from a
Speaker 1: company that doesn't hate your guts. It's kind of all
Speaker 1: around a no brainer. This isn't some faceless corporation. This
Speaker 1: company was born out of refusing the COVID mandate. This
Speaker 1: was entrepreneurialism in its finest right here and with a
Speaker 1: quality product. So highly recommend it. As I said, it's
Speaker 1: going to be seventy five bucks for the first year,
Speaker 1: so and you're getting ten percent off if you use
Speaker 1: Jose at checkout. So I mean you compare that to
Speaker 1: the multi blades, it's really a no brainer. I mean,
Speaker 1: and even then after that, you're just paying for blades
Speaker 1: after the first year, So even then it goes cheaper
Speaker 1: after you know, every subsequent time after that you get
Speaker 1: a hundred blades the first year. So really it's just
Speaker 1: a matter of how quick you go through it. It's
Speaker 1: really a great value. It's a lot better shave. I
Speaker 1: highly recommend it. I like using it for edging up
Speaker 1: and then also like shaving certain certain parsons in my face.
Speaker 1: You guys, and I have a little bit of a beer,
Speaker 1: but I edge it up shave the neck, and that's
Speaker 1: what I knew using the dough for. So I highly
Speaker 1: recommend that go over too, dooshavego dot com, Josie check out.
Speaker 1: And with that, let's start getting into some content. Guys.
Speaker 1: We got some stuff to get through. Let's see some more, y'all.
Speaker 1: Roll in AIRCNGC John Doe, good morning, everybody, Good morning people.
Speaker 1: Let's let's get through it. Let's as we do we're
Speaker 1: apt to do. We'll start with some foreign policy stuff,
Speaker 1: so let's get through that. I see you there, King David,
Speaker 1: good morning, good morning, all right, here we go. Start off,
Speaker 1: NETANYAHUO threatening to uphend US Iran talks by attacking Iran.
Speaker 1: I know we had talked before. There were sources that
Speaker 1: had said type deal, you know, sources say within the
Speaker 1: Knesset or wherever that there was going to be. You know,
Speaker 1: they were talking about do it perhaps have some sort
Speaker 1: of attack or something. So it looks like there's more
Speaker 1: on this end. So let's get into this. This is
Speaker 1: from Dave to camp So. As The New York Times
Speaker 1: reported on Wednesday, the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin net Yaho
Speaker 1: is threatening to upend negotiations between the US and Iran
Speaker 1: by potentially attacking Iranian nuclear facilities. The report said that
Speaker 1: the threat from Israel led to a recent tense phone
Speaker 1: call between Netanyahu and President Trump and a series of
Speaker 1: meetings between senior US and Israeli officials in recent days,
Speaker 1: which I think that was probably what we were talking
Speaker 1: about the other day when I was making fun of Levin.
Speaker 1: Trump was asked by reporters on Wednesday if he warned
Speaker 1: net Nyahu against attacking Iran during a phone call last week,
Speaker 1: and he said, well, I'd like to be honest, yes,
Speaker 1: I did. I actually have that up. Let's watch that
Speaker 1: real quick, because I thought this was good.
Speaker 4: Ian. Did you warn Prime mister Yahu against taking some
Speaker 4: sort of actions that.
Speaker 3: Could disrupt the talks there in a phone call last week?
Speaker 5: Well, I'd like to be honest, yes, I did.
Speaker 3: Next question, please.
Speaker 4: Actions, I did the Center Republicans want to put.
Speaker 6: It's not a warning.
Speaker 3: I said, I don't think it's appropriate.
Speaker 4: What exactly did you tell them?
Speaker 5: I said, I don't think it's appropriate.
Speaker 3: We're talking, we're having very good discussions with him, and
Speaker 3: I said, I don't think it's appropriate right now because
Speaker 3: if we can settle it with a very strong document,
Speaker 3: very strong with inspections and no trust. I don't trust anybody.
Speaker 3: I don't trust anybody, so no trust. I wanted very
Speaker 3: strong where we can go in with inspectors.
Speaker 5: We can take whatever we want, we can blow up
Speaker 5: whatever we want, but nobody getting killed. We can blow
Speaker 5: up a lab, but nobody's going to be in the lab,
Speaker 5: as opposed to everybody being in the lab and blowing
Speaker 5: it up. Right, two ways of doing it. Yeah, I
Speaker 5: told them this would be inappropriate to do right now
Speaker 5: because we're very close to a solution. Now that could
Speaker 5: change at any moment could change with a phone call.
Speaker 5: But right now I think they want to make a deal,
Speaker 5: and if we can make a deal, save a lot
Speaker 5: of lives.
Speaker 1: Now, this is kind of stuff I like to see. Obviously,
Speaker 1: there still is that hint of like, oh, we might
Speaker 1: still blow up your shit. But even then, even then,
Speaker 1: I do gotta give a little bit of a little
Speaker 1: bit of credit to old Donnie here that the way
Speaker 1: he framed that even was and like a he even
Speaker 1: mentioned blowing up, and he seems like he's the manner
Speaker 1: in which he's proposing blowing up. He said, Hey, there's
Speaker 1: two different ways to do it, you know, with someone
Speaker 1: in there or without. Obviously, it seems like he's implying,
Speaker 1: you know, I would I would interpret that it would
Speaker 1: you insinuate from that that perhaps he's kind of saying
Speaker 1: that maybe they were just gonna bomb him kind of
Speaker 1: semi unannounced, is what Israel was planning, and then there
Speaker 1: would obviously be some likely casualties, whereas Trump is seemingly
Speaker 1: proposing that if they were to do it, it would be
Speaker 1: like an official like, hey, we're telling you. I mean,
Speaker 1: maybe not enough notice to actually do anything about it,
Speaker 1: but hey, we're telling you we're blowing the shit up.
Speaker 1: This is a deal you guys can be out or whatever,
Speaker 1: or even pre arranged, because it almost seemed like that
Speaker 1: sounded like he was like implying like a thing or
Speaker 1: agreed upon, like as if so I don't know, if
Speaker 1: maybe these are things being proposed in talks too, like hey,
Speaker 1: we'll let you destroy this facility or that facility, because
Speaker 1: I never really perceived that, because I know one of
Speaker 1: the big things about this whole deal is the sticking
Speaker 1: issue of the enrichment. So maybe there could be some
Speaker 1: sort of alternative thing. I don't know, I mean that
Speaker 1: maybe that's thinking outside the box there or something. Maybe
Speaker 1: the idea of like maybe I Ran would be able
Speaker 1: to give some sort of concessions of like I don't know,
Speaker 1: we'll shut down this program and this province or that one,
Speaker 1: but we'll we'll still keep it going in that one
Speaker 1: or whatever, essentially reducing their production or something. I don't know,
Speaker 1: something along those lines. I mean, I have no idea.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm just completely certainly just you know, speculating
Speaker 1: based on that, but I don't know. I mean, either way,
Speaker 1: whatever that meant, i'd say that's an improvement over some
Speaker 1: of the rhetoric we've been seeing. And also, you know,
Speaker 1: given the context, it's like, essentially he's saying, hey, you know,
Speaker 1: fuck off politely obviously, I mean very He framed that
Speaker 1: in a very very very nice way, and that probably
Speaker 1: the nicest way you probably could frame someone saying hey,
Speaker 1: I'm going to bombard your whole deal or right now
Speaker 1: and murder some people and screw it all up. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's a I don't know. The way he's able to
Speaker 1: frame that is not that crazy. It's kind of wild.
Speaker 1: But either way, it's cool that he's saying these actually,
Speaker 1: you know, basically said hey, don't do that. But all right,
Speaker 1: let's get back to it. He said, they going more
Speaker 1: to the quotes here. Okay, I think that's might be.
Speaker 1: I think it's really all that we got to this story. Yeah,
Speaker 1: those two things combined, and then I think we're gonna
Speaker 1: show Benny boy here Ben Shapiro. I guess he got
Speaker 1: upset about this, so he said Ben Shapiro tached Trump
Speaker 1: for warning it, and you know who to hold off
Speaker 1: on strikes against Iran during nuclear negotiations. So let's hear this.
Speaker 1: I haven't watched this video. Yet I know people have
Speaker 1: been sharing around getting upset. I know I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: play this today. But he also had the gall to,
Speaker 1: I don't know, make fun of THEO Vonne in a
Speaker 1: very awkward manner because he I mean I didn't watch,
Speaker 1: I mean where it ended. I don't know if he
Speaker 1: went into his commentary, but I'll be he was addressing
Speaker 1: THEO Vaughn's recent kind of breakdown of you know, where
Speaker 1: he got like all upset about, you know, kind of
Speaker 1: saying this is a Geni Ziah blah blah blah. And
Speaker 1: this was Shapiro's kind of response. He then kind of goes, oh, well,
Speaker 1: you know, he's nice and all that, and he's kind
Speaker 1: of funny and I get why people like him, and
Speaker 1: it's like, but he's not that smart. It's kind of
Speaker 1: his angle. And then he goes in this weird off tangent,
Speaker 1: you know, kind of almost like he's trying to make
Speaker 1: fun of him or something like I don't know if
Speaker 1: he thinks he's being funny, but he's kind of making
Speaker 1: the point that like theophon's like an immature, like oh,
Speaker 1: he dresses like a teenager and this is that, and
Speaker 1: you're like Okay, yeah, okay, sure you're pointing out I
Speaker 1: guess maybe, yes, sure, I guess he's a little bit
Speaker 1: of immature. It's probably a little bit of personality defect.
Speaker 1: But I think to some extent that's why we like him.
Speaker 1: But yeah, this was side the point. He just he's
Speaker 1: just weird. He just chose the opportunity to go after
Speaker 1: like a beloved figure and make fun of the features
Speaker 1: that I guess I think people kind of find him
Speaker 1: beloved for. I know it's almost that like boyish spirit.
Speaker 1: I think why people like find that so endearing him,
Speaker 1: like coming to terms with something like the genocide of
Speaker 1: the Middle East. I don't know anyway, So that's an aside.
Speaker 1: Let's let's see what Benny Boy has to say here
Speaker 1: about this, because this is wild. I mean, the other
Speaker 1: thing was whatever. It just seemed awkward, like he was
Speaker 1: just making fun of Theovonne. I didn't but like I said,
Speaker 1: didn't flox the full clips. I didn't see if maybe
Speaker 1: he then lambassed him further. It seems like he was
Speaker 1: trying to be nice and trying to be like, oh,
Speaker 1: kind of give this caveat. He's nice, like, oh, but
Speaker 1: he doesn't think deeply about these things, which, okay, whatever,
Speaker 1: but then he kind of goes on this weird tangent
Speaker 1: sort of taking the time to insult him too. You're like, what,
Speaker 1: what are you doing? Very odd today to do that
Speaker 1: given the context of the guys upset about a genocide
Speaker 1: that you were perceived to be supporting to the nth degree,
Speaker 1: But let's go ahead and play this.
Speaker 6: So a kind of shocking story from Axios yesterday emerged
Speaker 6: that suggested that President Trump had cautioned is Really Prime
Speaker 6: Minister Benjamin Ninianato in a phone call last week not
Speaker 6: to take any action that could jeopardize negotiations between the
Speaker 6: United States and Ran on a new nuclear deal. Okay,
Speaker 6: so first of all, I have a question. Israel is
Speaker 6: not involved in those negotiations, so why should Israel hold off?
Speaker 6: Real question? Israel is the country most under threat from Iran,
Speaker 6: not the United States. Okay, So if we're going to
Speaker 6: take the full scale Jdvan's isolationist realist position, shouldn't the
Speaker 6: United States just sort of.
Speaker 1: What because we funded their entire fucking war and have
Speaker 1: been fighting wars for them for decades. But I digress.
Speaker 6: Go on, Ben, hush his hands and walk away and
Speaker 6: say whatever happens happens. But I noticed that's not what's happening. Instead,
Speaker 6: the so called restrainers inside the administration, they're not attempting
Speaker 6: to restrain the United States, which is already restrained. I
Speaker 6: promise you my one hundred percent certitude is that President
Speaker 6: Trump is not going to authorize a bombing raid on
Speaker 6: the Iranian nuclear facilities. Whether or not we should. I
Speaker 6: don't think it's going to happen. Okay, that's just the reality.
Speaker 6: So why is the restrainer team inside the Trump administration
Speaker 6: trying to stop Israel from doing that thing? Why with
Speaker 6: what bad deal? Iran keeps saying openly they will not
Speaker 6: stop in Richmond, and yet the United States is so
Speaker 6: desperate for a deal. What for the sake of a deal?
Speaker 6: Iranians know this, which is why they're pushing. And so
Speaker 6: when Trump warns Nton Yahoo not to don't wait.
Speaker 1: It's just astounding the idea that he's like, why should
Speaker 1: they wait, because we're in the middle of talks. That's
Speaker 1: why it's very very like this, oh oh, well we're
Speaker 1: gonna do that. We're like, okay, well, we're clearly working
Speaker 1: on something here. We're clearly working on something here, and
Speaker 1: I get they're like, oh, they keep saying no in Richmond,
Speaker 1: and we keep saying, but hey, everything that keeps coming
Speaker 1: out from both sides seemingly I mean, there have been
Speaker 1: a few reports here and there, but I'd say probably
Speaker 1: eighty percent of the reports I've seen coming you know,
Speaker 1: back from these you know, from each subsequent different talks,
Speaker 1: as it's always seems to be hopeful from typically both sides,
Speaker 1: so and ironically the times when it's not, it seems
Speaker 1: to be when there's some sort of weird Israel influence
Speaker 1: some somehow wiggles its way in or you know, does
Speaker 1: some sort of shit from the out from the periphery,
Speaker 1: so which they're trying to do again and.
Speaker 6: Do anything about Iran, Just trust us, okay, listen. I
Speaker 6: will trust that President Trump will cut a good deal
Speaker 6: if he continues to maintain the Trump one point no stands,
Speaker 6: which is no nuclear enrichment at all, no nuclear facilities
Speaker 6: at all. That was something that three weeks ago the
Speaker 6: Trump administration was saying President Trump himself again, I'm with
Speaker 6: Trump one point oh on this, not Steve Whitcoff and JD.
Speaker 6: Van's two point zero Donald Trump one point zero killed
Speaker 6: custom sol money, destroyed the Iranian economy and held them
Speaker 6: in check. Then Joe Biden, what I.
Speaker 1: Grew this back up to this, like destroyed the Iranian economy?
Speaker 1: Like what that means? Like, think about what that means.
Speaker 1: That means you're destroying the you were you were lowering
Speaker 1: the how do I put this? The the the quality
Speaker 1: of life or entire nation? Is what you're implicating? Is
Speaker 1: the implication there? Like you can even go into too,
Speaker 1: if you somehow were able to just buy you know,
Speaker 1: you say you have a button and you go, you know,
Speaker 1: devastate or destroy economy or or scale back economy, or
Speaker 1: or rev up economy. If you scale back economy, if
Speaker 1: you choose that, you are literally killing people. That's that's
Speaker 1: because it is It's it's a direct indicator of well
Speaker 1: being to some extent. Obviously, I mean there's other indicators.
Speaker 1: I guess I say direct, maybe maybe a little more indirect,
Speaker 1: because I mean money obviously isn't everything, but generally speaking,
Speaker 1: economically that is kind of an indicator of how well
Speaker 1: you're doing the standard of living of those around you.
Speaker 1: Obviously there are other indicators, you know, community stuff like that,
Speaker 1: so obviously I think it's way more that because obviously,
Speaker 1: if I believe that I would still be active duty military,
Speaker 1: I'd still be making way more money. But I was
Speaker 1: not happy. So you get there's there's more to it
Speaker 1: than that. But point being, that's the the idea of saying, oh,
Speaker 1: devastating an economy or something. It's like, yeah, you're talking
Speaker 1: about killing people, You're talking about ruining lives, you're talking
Speaker 1: about like making making children destitute. It's just kind of
Speaker 1: evil of the nth degree to just say it in
Speaker 1: passing is if this is the thing we should do,
Speaker 1: because maybe you might get your end goal that you
Speaker 1: want of something, mel though it almost never works. You
Speaker 1: know that like the you know, the idea of tariffs,
Speaker 1: you know, blockades, you know, any any of the different
Speaker 1: actions or war or anything that you to try to
Speaker 1: diminish the economy of a country, of the idea of
Speaker 1: being as somehow this is going to affect the elite
Speaker 1: class and make some sort of political change, which that's
Speaker 1: not how that works. I mean, look at North Korea,
Speaker 1: Like look at North Korea when you look at what
Speaker 1: the lights of the map that light up, and it's
Speaker 1: like dark and you're like, how well is Kim Jong
Speaker 1: un living? I'm sure he's probably killing it, fucking having
Speaker 1: a fun time. I mean, obviously, maybe that's not a
Speaker 1: great example, because maybe even then the elite class is
Speaker 1: pretty weak. But point being is, generally speaking, the elite
Speaker 1: class are pretty good at separating themselves from any sort
Speaker 1: of discomfort that comes along with an imperiled economy. If anything,
Speaker 1: a lot of times those fuckers thrive. So let's finish
Speaker 1: and Steve, maybe Benny will redeem himself. Last twenty seconds.
Speaker 6: Came in reverse, a bunch of that stuff, and you
Speaker 6: got October seventh and a vast regional war. Why wouldn't
Speaker 6: we just go back to Trump one point zero? That
Speaker 6: is the foreign policy that actually shaped the Abraham Accords.
Speaker 6: Why is that not the thing instead of calling the
Speaker 6: Prime Minister of Israel and telling him he needs to
Speaker 6: restrain himself on her own.
Speaker 1: All right, that's the end of that one. Let's roll
Speaker 1: the chat. It's been a minute since I popped in,
Speaker 1: and see what you guys would say. Let's go through it.
Speaker 1: So it's true Trump isn't a Malthusian murder loversus doctor
Speaker 1: for twenty Yeah, I mean I do get that impression.
Speaker 1: I don't know. It's always hard to tell who does what,
Speaker 1: who tells all that stuff. But yeah, Doc Tory says,
Speaker 1: Ben just needs to come to terms with the fact
Speaker 1: that Israel's America's bitch. If they don't like it, they
Speaker 1: can go work the corner one hundred percent like you. Yeah, Well,
Speaker 1: as I said, we're funding your wars and been doing everything.
Speaker 1: I mean, we're about to get into some more stories,
Speaker 1: and you know, I'll probably roll right into actually one
Speaker 1: of the stories of the type of you know, bending
Speaker 1: over backwards we're clearly doing for this specific country to
Speaker 1: try it. So, yeah, all right, let's keep going. Eddy
Speaker 1: Grim says, I want these pieces of shit out of their country,
Speaker 1: and there's yeah, so it's not even mental gymnastics at
Speaker 1: this point that Shapiro licking mental windows exactly like this
Speaker 1: isn't even like this. It takes no effort really to
Speaker 1: logically slap down. It's just what do you mean, like
Speaker 1: there were supposedly allies, even just at a very very
Speaker 1: base level, even if we weren't funding them to a
Speaker 1: crazy degree. And I guess actually maybe that won't be
Speaker 1: as clear because he does the point that like, oh,
Speaker 1: they're I guess they have more of an interest, you know,
Speaker 1: being in the area. But I mean, if we for
Speaker 1: some reason, whatever reason, we're here, we're doing a deal
Speaker 1: with them, I don't know it's completely fair to say, hey,
Speaker 1: back off. I mean, especially it'd be one thing if
Speaker 1: they were actually dealing with some sort of military threat
Speaker 1: from them right now. I guess they would probably make
Speaker 1: the argument of like Hesbula or something, but they really aren't.
Speaker 1: I mean, they've kind of invaded a shit like if anything,
Speaker 1: they're like got buffer zones to like a goddamn basically
Speaker 1: three hundred and sixty degree around Israel and damn near
Speaker 1: every country. I forget how many fronts they're on right now,
Speaker 1: So they're pushing into other countries. So the idea that
Speaker 1: they're in any sort of real danger from Iran, the
Speaker 1: danger that they're in is from any Iran in any areas,
Speaker 1: because they're in some sort of other region and near
Speaker 1: forces that we might be able to construe as saying
Speaker 1: from Iran Hesbala or something like that. I don't really
Speaker 1: feel like there any sort of real, you know, any
Speaker 1: danger from Iran right now, unless they fucking do something
Speaker 1: like this like I attack attack Iran. So it's kind
Speaker 1: of fucking stupid. I mean, I guess the argum would
Speaker 1: be then that the idea is like the nuclear threat.
Speaker 1: But I don't know, there's there's no reason you can't wait.
Speaker 1: In my opinion, it makes no sense. I would say
Speaker 1: just even at like a even at the lowest of levels,
Speaker 1: like maybe at the lowest of levels, Ben would have
Speaker 1: a tiny bit of an argument, but even then you
Speaker 1: would probably make the case like, come on, let's let's
Speaker 1: let's let's defer towards diplomacy and you know, working with
Speaker 1: your allies and saying, hey, why would you fuck up
Speaker 1: something that we're working on we seem to be hopeful on.
Speaker 1: I mean, just even the most base of levels, that's
Speaker 1: what without even going into the insane, you know, fucking
Speaker 1: incestuous relationship between the United States and Israel. So get fucked?
Speaker 1: Do do do? Scrolling through? Uh Marnomax is late for
Speaker 1: the dump? Yeah here you are very late than never.
Speaker 1: Uh F Shapiro and f Israel one hundred percent. All right,
Speaker 1: let's get into let's get into the next story. Uh,
Speaker 1: the story that I was kind of alluding to, I
Speaker 1: think ties into this, It's like, well, why would you
Speaker 1: do this? It's like, okay, well listen, uh okay, well
Speaker 1: maybe once you start stop fucking with our laws, then
Speaker 1: we can uh then we can maybe have be in
Speaker 1: an issue in a spot where you have some sort
Speaker 1: of argument there or something where you're like, oh, well
Speaker 1: we have we have more of a stake in in this, uh,
Speaker 1: in this relationship because we're closer or some ship you know,
Speaker 1: which is which usually holds up. But it's like, hey,
Speaker 1: we know, all right, well then you need to you
Speaker 1: need to fucking dial back on this relationship. Marco Rubio
Speaker 1: says vigorous new visa Polsy will prevent israel critics from
Speaker 1: entering the US, which this is uh so this is
Speaker 1: from Dave to Camp. Now this is kind of just
Speaker 1: naked naked uh jew just Mongren for Jews. I guess.
Speaker 1: I guess. I don't know, like this is working for Israel,
Speaker 1: I don't. I just really well, okay, let's get into this.
Speaker 1: It's just I'm kind of flustered once I learned about this. This
Speaker 1: one's nuts. Like usually the longest goes on unless they
Speaker 1: try to hide it, because keep in mind, is all
Speaker 1: this all start as anti Semitism. They even did the
Speaker 1: i h R a working definition, enshrined that in law
Speaker 1: as the definition of anti semitism, thus making this little
Speaker 1: sneaky trick where you can, you know, you define some
Speaker 1: things which clearly aren't really anti Semitism as anti semitism,
Speaker 1: and then they do this thing. But now they make
Speaker 1: laws around anti semitism, and you know, and here we
Speaker 1: are and obviously these things aren't really anti semitism. We're
Speaker 1: getting in it. And now that the coin is flipping
Speaker 1: toward getting to the point where they're not even really
Speaker 1: saying anti semitism, where they're just saying, so you know,
Speaker 1: in this little thing that he's getting ready to create
Speaker 1: in this h So right here says a Secretary of State,
Speaker 1: Marc Rubio. This is like words directly from him. He
Speaker 1: said that they were implementing a vigorous new visa policy
Speaker 1: to prevent people from entering the US who are critical
Speaker 1: of Israel. So now that that wasn't a direct quote.
Speaker 1: Now vigorous new visa policies direct quote. Now this is
Speaker 1: a direct quote. We have implemented a vigorous new visa
Speaker 1: policy that will prevent foreign nationals from coming to the
Speaker 1: US to promote a mean hatred against our Jewish community,
Speaker 1: they said, in a combating anti Semitism. And then he
Speaker 1: goes on to say, so, I guess he did still
Speaker 1: kind of you know, stick that in there. But then
Speaker 1: he goes Rubio said, the US will hold international organizations
Speaker 1: and nations accountable for rhetoric against Israel. Okay, I guess
Speaker 1: to be fair, I misunderstood that when initially so now
Speaker 1: they go into I mean, it's still gross, it's still
Speaker 1: it's still a sliding towards that way. But that was
Speaker 1: talking about the international organizations, which that I think that
Speaker 1: would probably be more morally he might be kind of
Speaker 1: almost getting at the uh. There was some new like
Speaker 1: a what is it called the divests the whole like
Speaker 1: sanctioned movement or whatever. I forget what it's called. I
Speaker 1: think that's referring to that that they were going to
Speaker 1: start start having some sort of legal recourse or something
Speaker 1: not necessarily legal le recourse maybe not work with them
Speaker 1: or something. I forget the specifics on it. On those
Speaker 1: international organizations that were involved in any sort of anything
Speaker 1: that would you know, basically go against Israel, like not
Speaker 1: funding Israel or boycotting because apparently that's actually fairly calm.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of international organizations doing that because I mean,
Speaker 1: who would have thought when you conduct a genocide, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of people around the world aside, Hey, I
Speaker 1: don't really want to conduct trade with you anymore. Who
Speaker 1: would have thought that? So but yeah, so I guess
Speaker 1: we're still were for further putting up those walls there.
Speaker 1: But either way, it's still it's still sliding towards that way.
Speaker 1: So so, the Trump administration recently paused all interviews for
Speaker 1: foreigners seeking student visas as it prepares to expand vetting
Speaker 1: and screening of social media. So yeah, I mean they're
Speaker 1: they're they're getting ready to I mean, they're they're leaning
Speaker 1: right into it. They're not fucking around. So last bit
Speaker 1: here said, today, I'm announcing a new visa restriction policy
Speaker 1: that will apply to foreignationals who're responsible for censorship of
Speaker 1: protected expression in the United States. It's unacceptable for foreign
Speaker 1: officials to issue or threaten to rest warrants on US
Speaker 1: citistans or US residents for social media posts on American
Speaker 1: platforms while physically present on US soil. Oh yeah, no,
Speaker 1: I forgot now, that. I'm sorry, I should have skimmed that.
Speaker 1: That's my fad power fault for skimming that. I forgot to.
Speaker 1: The second component of the story, which makes it even interesting,
Speaker 1: is any seemingly contradictory move. He announced that new balls
Speaker 1: need to prevent foreign nationals who have been involved in
Speaker 1: censoring the speech of Americans from obtaining visa. So essentially,
Speaker 1: any sort of entity or person that's engaged in any
Speaker 1: sort of censorship. I don't know, you could probably need
Speaker 1: some sort of foreign tech magnates or something. That's the
Speaker 1: only thing I could really feel like this would apply to.
Speaker 1: It's kind of a kind of seems like a pointless
Speaker 1: fucking rule to me, really, I mean, how many people
Speaker 1: just really apply to, aside from maybe a few fucking
Speaker 1: billionaires at like whatever. So I don't know. It's it's
Speaker 1: just funny that they're, you know, doing that, which I
Speaker 1: think wasn't it like a couple of weeks ago there
Speaker 1: or something like that. I think it was, ironically, I
Speaker 1: want to say, one on like Shapiro Show or something,
Speaker 1: and I think they were both of them talk while
Speaker 1: something some other thing was going. I forget which were
Speaker 1: where they were out in their rollout of like Operation
Speaker 1: you know, Protect the Jew but A yeah, they were
Speaker 1: both you know, doing some sort of talkie talk a
Speaker 1: while back and doing this exact I think there was
Speaker 1: something like that going on under one of these policies
Speaker 1: out there, and at the same time they were both
Speaker 1: you know, you know, pontificating about how bad censorship is
Speaker 1: and you, dude, what the fuck is wrong with you?
Speaker 1: Are you? I mean, I don't know, I guess.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 1: Daniel MacAdams recently did like a whole fucking show on
Speaker 1: it on Ron Paul roasting him. So good for him.
Speaker 1: Let's roll for the chat. See what you guys have
Speaker 1: to saying. We all have a little two insiduss chloeinairs
Speaker 1: big Yeah, we do. U scrolling through greatest criminals in
Speaker 1: the world have a system that designed to steal everything,
Speaker 1: then passing laws that criminalize discussing the criminals and their behavior, yep,
Speaker 1: which is a little bit freaky that these things that
Speaker 1: we have, these anti semitism laws now, because that was
Speaker 1: kind of what isn't it like? From my understanding, I
Speaker 1: don't know Whymar a fucking expert for my understanding, I
Speaker 1: think that's kind of where Wymar started getting real squirrel
Speaker 1: is right around the time the anti Semitism laws started
Speaker 1: going through. I think the same thing was in Bullshevi
Speaker 1: isn't but during it in Russia, because I think it
Speaker 1: was Russia under the Bolsheviks. I think if I recall correctly,
Speaker 1: when the first anti semitism laws were passed, and then
Speaker 1: I think then it goes over to then after that
Speaker 1: then obviously the revolution tried to go over to Germany.
Speaker 1: Uh there was the Wymar Republic period of time where
Speaker 1: that was like mid revolution somebody, you know, some people said, hey,
Speaker 1: we've had enough of this shit. The Nazis rise up,
Speaker 1: But I'm pretty sure in that Wymark period they had
Speaker 1: some of that. So point being is the two other
Speaker 1: indicators in history when these sort of laws went to
Speaker 1: place don't seem to play out well. I mean, at
Speaker 1: least we're not the ones, uh supposedly doing literally I mean,
Speaker 1: I guess we're funding it, may as well be basically
Speaker 1: doing it, but technically we're not the ones doing the
Speaker 1: jest side. So maybe in compared to history, maybe we'll
Speaker 1: get off a little bit better than the rest. Uh
Speaker 1: you know, I don't know. We don't have a halamadoor.
Speaker 1: On our side, we're not doing a I don't know,
Speaker 1: a Holocaust. We're not off and I mean, I guess
Speaker 1: we're sort of off from the Palestinees but Israel. So
Speaker 1: I don't know. We might we might be able escape
Speaker 1: this one a little bit better than previous historical examples.
Speaker 1: But either way, don't like where we're going with this one,
Speaker 1: right it's going through. Oh yeah, we aren ym are
Speaker 1: two point zero, says John Doe to yea Operation Protect
Speaker 1: the Jew in the main function of the US in
Speaker 1: November sixth, nineteen sixty three. Although I you know, well,
Speaker 1: I joke obviously, I say Joe Jew way too liberally,
Speaker 1: and I feel gay to even clarify, but I do
Speaker 1: do W what a point? Oh, I don't literally mean
Speaker 1: the Jew and needs to protect Israel. If anything, I
Speaker 1: lean kind of in towards the uh the the idea
Speaker 1: that they treat their peasant class all the same as
Speaker 1: any other elites do. So I don't know. I think
Speaker 1: there's a lot of fucking poor Jews that don't really
Speaker 1: don't really get the program. A lot of them are
Speaker 1: come maybe brainwashed to one degree another. So I think
Speaker 1: the you know, an'tything is necessarily you know exactly. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's so many different types of jew two. So I
Speaker 1: mean it's to say jew is like, I don't know,
Speaker 1: it's a there definitely are. I definitely there are certain
Speaker 1: strains of Jewish thought. I guess you could say that.
Speaker 1: I would definitely be like, what the fuck? I'm definitely
Speaker 1: suspiced just of any of the Kabbala originated beliefs A
Speaker 1: little bit to the taallmood sketches me a bit. So yeah,
Speaker 1: but there, I'm sure there are. I've heard some you know,
Speaker 1: some components or some sex that seem better than others.
Speaker 1: So I don't know. If I can't fucking know, I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna talk, but shit, I don't really know. But
Speaker 1: I do know for a fact there are people who
Speaker 1: call themselves Jews that are cool out there in the world.
Speaker 1: So uh, even then, the whole thing of like the
Speaker 1: term of what even is a Jew, it's it's like,
Speaker 1: what do you mean, do you mean religious Jude? He
Speaker 1: just mean some guy who's fucking mom, you know, happened
Speaker 1: to be you know, the descended from someone whose mom,
Speaker 1: whose mom, whose mom, whose mom, whose mom was a Jew?
Speaker 1: Like it kind of didn't really mean a lot. If anything,
Speaker 1: It's almost like they try to squeeze that into as
Speaker 1: many that labeled as many people as possible to try
Speaker 1: to create this like liability shield type thing. So that
Speaker 1: way you kind of create this, uh, this group protection thing.
Speaker 1: So whereas I think the bore people break that idea
Speaker 1: of like, oh, like, no, I don't have to Why
Speaker 1: am I identifying why as me as some atheist in
Speaker 1: in fucking New York, Not me particularly, I'm speaking as
Speaker 1: some other jew, some atheist in New York who's not
Speaker 1: at all tied it to the religion or the culture
Speaker 1: or whatever, and it has some fucking nine to five
Speaker 1: office job. Why in the fuck would they identify with
Speaker 1: someone on the other side of the world that wears
Speaker 1: a small hat and identifies with a very specific, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know, orthodox you know, set of beliefs and
Speaker 1: wants to murder a bunch of brown people. I just
Speaker 1: but it's it's kind of like, if we keep passing
Speaker 1: out this label, you kind of have this idea where
Speaker 1: people start thinking, oh, any attack on one is attack
Speaker 1: on all. That's not really true in my opinion. So
Speaker 1: but let's keep going. Enough trying to enough of me
Speaker 1: part play an operation protect the Jew. So, but yeah,
Speaker 1: that's growing through. Yeah, there you go. Yes, the Talmudic
Speaker 1: slush capitalistic variations of one that is an existential threat
Speaker 1: to the gooy so star Cris I say, okay, we
Speaker 1: get it, Josie, like jeez, I like juice. I like
Speaker 1: funny enough, though, like if I looked at like the
Speaker 1: my philosophical influences and stuff like that, or like really
Speaker 1: even maybe some of the major influencers I've really kind
Speaker 1: of navigated to. But ironically, yeah, I mean, so it
Speaker 1: is like if anything I've I think, probably, as I've
Speaker 1: said many times, a reason why I don't even give
Speaker 1: any sort of credence to people going, my God, you
Speaker 1: shouldn't talk that way when I say, like do this,
Speaker 1: do that. But it's like literally my my lived experience
Speaker 1: or whatever it is. I haven't really in a like
Speaker 1: met in many Jews. I mean, like and the ones
Speaker 1: that I have, I've been like I had a guy
Speaker 1: who worked with the military as a Jew, and he's
Speaker 1: like he's He's like, yeah, I'm a Jew, but like
Speaker 1: I don't fucking have I don't even really call myself that.
Speaker 1: I'm just technically, like I don't fucking like nothing to
Speaker 1: do with it like that. That's that's the minimal experience
Speaker 1: I've had with anything Jewish. I don't even think I've
Speaker 1: ever really seen one in real life, like even the
Speaker 1: small hats until I was an adult, so like I
Speaker 1: lived in the rural areas, so to me, it's almost
Speaker 1: like I've always just like it's just so, you mean,
Speaker 1: it's just a white guy that maybe might have a religion,
Speaker 1: might not like okay, like I don't fucking what does
Speaker 1: this mean if anything. To me, it's always just been ridiculous.
Speaker 1: That's why I've always just growing up, always just do this,
Speaker 1: do that, because it's I mean, it's just kind of
Speaker 1: like ridiculous. It's just it never even occurred to me
Speaker 1: anyone would be offended by it, because it's like, why
Speaker 1: would you be offended by this? You genuinely think I
Speaker 1: care that you're a Jew? Like that's you get how
Speaker 1: ridiculous that is, right, That's that's that's ludicrous, Like it's like, no,
Speaker 1: this is a shorthand for this or that. And then
Speaker 1: once you start getting sensitive about it, I go, why
Speaker 1: are you getting sensitive about it? I think I'm gonna
Speaker 1: use it more. So that's just kind of a little
Speaker 1: bit of a little insight to inside of my head.
Speaker 4: So uh.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so see, I don't know. I don't live in
Speaker 1: near Jews. Yeah, so that's I mean, who knows, Maybe
Speaker 1: everything the jew haters say about Jews is true. Because
Speaker 1: even then from that, from what I just that little
Speaker 1: mini rant I gave I, I don't have any sort
Speaker 1: of like I've never really, Like I said, my lived
Speaker 1: experience is very very light on the Jew experience. So
Speaker 1: who knows. Maybe there are as evil as they say
Speaker 1: they are. I don't think so. I think they're probably
Speaker 1: just people just like the rest of us. So uh yeah,
Speaker 1: but uh, let's but with that as I'm a caveating
Speaker 1: to kind of be like, I don't think they're all
Speaker 1: super duper evil. Here's a literal, fucking demon Jew right here.
Speaker 1: This is Bazaill little smow Trich, this fucking gigantic piece
Speaker 1: of shit.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 1: He vows to rebuild the temple during Jerusalem Day celebrations.
Speaker 1: This was from yesterday. I just thought it was significant
Speaker 1: enough to bring up. Uh So, yeah, he was one
Speaker 1: of the people that was at that celebration. I told
Speaker 1: you guys about the other day. I believe this is
Speaker 1: that same exact that the wh I can I think
Speaker 1: of it? Parade? Why can I think of that word?
Speaker 1: Essentially the parade that was, you know, their their celebration
Speaker 1: to do annually to fucking go o who who we conquered,
Speaker 1: you guys, And they knew all chant death Day, rabs
Speaker 1: and all this sort of stuff as they go around,
Speaker 1: which sounds almost like a parody and made up, but no,
Speaker 1: it's true, and they have legitimate, fucking you know, high
Speaker 1: up political leaders who show up to these things, like
Speaker 1: Ben Gavier was there as well. You know though it's
Speaker 1: like the significant part of the reporting. Initially I didn't
Speaker 1: know Bazila was there. It may have been mentioned, I
Speaker 1: just didn't catch it. But now yeah, they're pointing out
Speaker 1: that I guess he did make certain statements about rebuilding
Speaker 1: the Alaksa temple or not really rebuilding a temple, which
Speaker 1: is all Axa Mosque is actually what I meant to say,
Speaker 1: said that wrong, But which for those I mean, I
Speaker 1: don't I'm not Muslim, but I'm a I do. I
Speaker 1: am aware of the all Axa Mosque is apparently a
Speaker 1: huge religious site for them. Pretty fucking big deal. The
Speaker 1: Temple is a huge religious, you know thing for the Jews,
Speaker 1: and that's part of hell. That's a you know for
Speaker 1: most Christians interpret that as part of their uh you know,
Speaker 1: end times you know nonsense. Essentially is that the Temple
Speaker 1: is going to be rebuilt, and so the Jews also,
Speaker 1: you know, want to rebuild their temple as well. And
Speaker 1: I think there's even something in the Islam too with
Speaker 1: I don't know if it was about them, but rebuilding
Speaker 1: a temple or maybe a destruction, and I think there's
Speaker 1: something to do with some of their end times prophecies
Speaker 1: that like literally ties into this sort of thing. But
Speaker 1: even if it doesn't, you know, just obviously just throwing
Speaker 1: a major religious site of them of theirs would obviously
Speaker 1: get a little bit under their skin, which this has
Speaker 1: been an issue for a long period of time. This is,
Speaker 1: I guess, kind of one of the areas of you
Speaker 1: could almost point to a kind of where you almost
Speaker 1: come in at a seeing what's really going on here
Speaker 1: sort of when it comes to these religious sites, although
Speaker 1: I think it's much more than that. I think it
Speaker 1: even transcends religion when it comes to what's going on
Speaker 1: with Israel and why they do this and that. But
Speaker 1: there definitely is a religious component, and I think we're
Speaker 1: staring in the eye right now. And this religious component,
Speaker 1: as I kind of tried to lay out, unfortunately, has
Speaker 1: a dialectic fact that plays into the other the pretty
Speaker 1: much every major religion except for I guess Buddhism. I
Speaker 1: guess this has no this doesn't play into any sort
Speaker 1: of Buddhist End Times eschatology that I'm aware of. So yeah,
Speaker 1: if you were ever concerned about any sort of possi
Speaker 1: well world War III apocalyptic scenario, I couldn't think of
Speaker 1: anything better to trigger such a thing. And here we
Speaker 1: have Smotrich once again fucking flirting with it. So I
Speaker 1: guess he called for complete redemption and reconstruction of the
Speaker 1: temple here referring to the Aloxa Mosque, which settlers had
Speaker 1: raided earlier. So I guess they had just related that too.
Speaker 1: So that's great. It says we are conquering the land
Speaker 1: of Israel, liberating Godza, settling Gaza, and defeating the enemy's
Speaker 1: triot set of crowds that chanted death to Arabs as
Speaker 1: they march to Jerusalem's Old City and attacked Palestinians. With
Speaker 1: God's help, we will expand Israel's borders, bring about complete redemption,
Speaker 1: and rebuild the temple here, he said. He also reiterates
Speaker 1: calls for jewishettlement Godza, declaring that Israel is not free
Speaker 1: of the word occupation. Hey, guys, I don't know what
Speaker 1: Israel's planning on doing right now at this curtain stage
Speaker 1: in the war. Do they really mean the things that
Speaker 1: they say? I think they fucking do. It's frustrating when
Speaker 1: you're someone like me or you guys that were day in,
Speaker 1: day out checking to see what the you know, literal
Speaker 1: this is like what the Finance minister, I believe, the
Speaker 1: Finance minister, the Prime minister, many other ministers you know, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, the high ups and the knesse and the
Speaker 1: things they have to say, and over and over and
Speaker 1: over again, they say these things in no uncertain terms
Speaker 1: of what they mean. There maybe might be the tiniest
Speaker 1: bit of obfuscation at times, but for most part they
Speaker 1: don't really hedge their words, especially smoke Dridge, and they
Speaker 1: say it over and over and over and over again,
Speaker 1: and still despite that, you have zonus all the time.
Speaker 1: That's a lie, that's a lie, no, no, no, lie
Speaker 1: lie lie anti semi anti semi lie, Lie Lie, lie lie,
Speaker 1: over and over again. Blood libel, blood libel thrown in
Speaker 1: a couple of times. So yeah, I mean, I don't know,
Speaker 1: it's it's it's it's frustrating. It's like, hey, guys, uh,
Speaker 1: just kind of beating our head against the wall. And
Speaker 1: then it goes on and on. Israel approves biggest West
Speaker 1: Bank settlement expansion in over thirty years. So great, So
Speaker 1: they're I believe this was smoke Tridge as well implementing this.
Speaker 1: So the cabinet's decision to establish twenty new settlements, the
Speaker 1: most extensive move it's kind since the Oslo Cords, under
Speaker 1: which Israel committed not to establish new settlements, will dramatically
Speaker 1: reshape the West Bank and entrench the occupation even further.
Speaker 1: Bear in mind this is in the you know, the
Speaker 1: timing here is right after they had just threatened what
Speaker 1: the delegation of you know, the other Western nations that
Speaker 1: seemed to be, you know, creating a coalition against Israel.
Speaker 1: The Hey, if you guys decide to recognize Palestine as
Speaker 1: a state, guess what we're gonna do. We're gonna go
Speaker 1: ahead and annex the West Bank. Well that's basically what
Speaker 1: this is de facto. So here we are basically seeing it.
Speaker 1: I think it's I don't know, like to what degree
Speaker 1: you would say this, I guess you would say this
Speaker 1: technically isn't because it's through settlements. And so they do
Speaker 1: this weird roundabout game which I've kind of been in,
Speaker 1: you know, the past couple of weeks, given you guys,
Speaker 1: the kind of the playbook here is so, but this
Speaker 1: one's a little bit more on the nose and a
Speaker 1: little bit more government sanctions. This is just straight up
Speaker 1: like here you go, guys. But it's technically still not
Speaker 1: I guess to the to the clearest degree, I guess
Speaker 1: a government actions because it's not like they're coming in
Speaker 1: there with troops. They're you know, shutting off the board.
Speaker 1: They're saying, get the fuck out, this is ours now, like,
Speaker 1: so it's not or whatever, you know, essentially creating a
Speaker 1: force in that way. So it's not like it, but
Speaker 1: it's they're essentially allowing you enabling a private citizenry, a
Speaker 1: citizenry to do it themselves. So it's really in no
Speaker 1: way any difference. So I mean, you guys, get this
Speaker 1: is this is how it works. You know, they go
Speaker 1: there is a in an area where Palistinians live. Uh,
Speaker 1: some you know settlers start. You know, usually it's the
Speaker 1: the youths. The youths out there doing doing their wild ship.
Speaker 1: They they start burning down, you know, they start destroying buildings,
Speaker 1: attacking Palestinians. They start you know, destroying crops, just harassing
Speaker 1: the people. And then over time some of them leave.
Speaker 1: They may even go to the you know, violence to
Speaker 1: it in a crazy degree and push them out. And
Speaker 1: then once they are able to get them out, they
Speaker 1: start implement putting a little camp and then they build
Speaker 1: up and build up and build up. They even sometimes
Speaker 1: have situations like this where they just go ahead and boom,
Speaker 1: here you go. They literally they say, hey, we're allowing
Speaker 1: you just they straight up say hey, we're allowing you
Speaker 1: to do this. They literally get word from the government.
Speaker 1: So a lot of times they just do it on
Speaker 1: their own and no one fucking cares. So, I mean,
Speaker 1: there's plenty of settlements that have been illegal. I mean
Speaker 1: times they're all illegal, like just varying levels of illegal,
Speaker 1: because as we just point out here, these are ones
Speaker 1: they disagreed to it's also illegal under inter international law,
Speaker 1: but it's they just do it. But then there's a
Speaker 1: there's a semi legal where they go, oh, you can
Speaker 1: do it, and then there's the ones where they the
Speaker 1: settlers just do it anyways, and but then it's like
Speaker 1: kind of legal in the sense that the government doesn't
Speaker 1: do anything about it. So is it like it's kind
Speaker 1: of the idea of like, if you know something's illegal
Speaker 1: but it's not enforced, is it really illegal? Not really,
Speaker 1: So that's what we're seeing. So we're seeing more of that,
Speaker 1: and uh yeah, bummer, it's a real but hey, on
Speaker 1: the same time, these people keep showing their they keep
Speaker 1: showing their cards, keep showing them what they're about. So
Speaker 1: all right, let's let's finish out foreign policy and get
Speaker 1: a move on. Move on to the rest of our topics.
Speaker 1: Because I am definitely, as I said, as I alluded to,
Speaker 1: I have not been as curt as I would try
Speaker 1: to be. I was trying to be. There's no way
Speaker 1: I'm getting out of here, but at an hour. But yeah,
Speaker 1: Russia says it's down two hundred ninety six Ukrainian drones
Speaker 1: and massive overnight attacks. This is the other day says
Speaker 1: this from this is something I would have covered yesterday.
Speaker 1: But either way, this is showing a significant increase in
Speaker 1: the Ukrainian drones that we're seeing over in Russia. Despite
Speaker 1: the irony of what the least the recent mean tweet
Speaker 1: from Trump where he goes into oh oh, you're all
Speaker 1: these you know, drone attacks in Ukraine from Russia, and
Speaker 1: it's like, well, it seems like the exact opposite seems
Speaker 1: to actually be the truth. I mean, don't get me wrong,
Speaker 1: I'm not denying that Russia is doing drone attacks either.
Speaker 1: It just seems it seems that's the they're they're increasing
Speaker 1: the the the drone activity over there, and it's a
Speaker 1: that's so that's what the war's doing right now. It
Speaker 1: just seems I just think it's kind of creepy. For one,
Speaker 1: I just just noticing an increase. That's just why I'm
Speaker 1: telling you guys, for one, For one to know that
Speaker 1: the war's still gone going and it seems to be
Speaker 1: changing forms, and it just this seems to be the
Speaker 1: creepy new future war that we're seeing where they swarm
Speaker 1: foreign leaders for assassination attempts, They send out swarms to
Speaker 1: fucking attack this, but it's just creepy. It's a creepy,
Speaker 1: creepy concept. All right, let's roll to the chat and
Speaker 1: then well we'll get on to it. So Allan says,
Speaker 1: I met many Jews, some are actually cool. See there
Speaker 1: you go? Uh did you do scrolling through Judaism is
Speaker 1: just wor should be evil directly? Maybe? I don't know,
Speaker 1: Uh scrolling through? Did scrolling? Scroll in? Scrolling through seeing
Speaker 1: what all you guys have to say. Gilgamesh is a
Speaker 1: story of how the skywaters fell and destroyed the whole world. Okay, well, okay, uh,
Speaker 1: I don't know what the point of that was, but yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: how can this be timmy poole? Assure me it wasn't
Speaker 1: like this, By the way, I found the videos, and
Speaker 1: I debated maybe going over those the day, but I'm
Speaker 1: trying to keep it short and I don't want to
Speaker 1: keep making fun of It's too easy. It's just it's
Speaker 1: just too easy. I don't know, and you guys know it.
Speaker 1: The other day I did a little rant, but the
Speaker 1: whole timpoole thing, it's a I will say. I did
Speaker 1: want to. I wanted to show the reply from fan
Speaker 1: does I'm not going to cause it's just I don't
Speaker 1: I don't wanna. I'm just I just don't want to
Speaker 1: get sucked in that kind of gay drama. Yeah, we
Speaker 1: all get it, Timmy, Tim's kind of a fucking I
Speaker 1: don't know, a milk toast fucking and uh like whatever,
Speaker 1: I just just grow a backbone. It's that's all. I'd say.
Speaker 1: Fucking stand for something that'd be cool. I mean, but whatever,
Speaker 1: it's just this this whole like this constant like oh
Speaker 1: you know, it's it just it just we see it,
Speaker 1: and it feels like running cover for Israel. So I
Speaker 1: mean you may say, oh, it's not You're like, okay,
Speaker 1: well we just see it. So I don't know. Obviously
Speaker 1: you can say you're not. There is I guess this
Speaker 1: maybe glimmer of good faith that one could jump through
Speaker 1: and go, oh, there's this way to understand. But this
Speaker 1: comes to a certain point where like it just strikes
Speaker 1: me as at the very least like some sort of
Speaker 1: level of cowardice, you know, just not willing to make
Speaker 1: a stance. Either cowardice or corruption is really kind of
Speaker 1: the only options in my opinion at this point, because
Speaker 1: I don't know, I feel like if you understand where
Speaker 1: he's coming from and where he purports to come from.
Speaker 1: You'd think this would be something stand for. And this
Speaker 1: whole argument of like, well why care for things near me?
Speaker 1: It's like, yeah, well, I mean, as I kind of
Speaker 1: went into the other day, well it's near you, whether
Speaker 1: you like it or not. This is where your taxpayer
Speaker 1: dollars are going to. This has formed your entire adult life.
Speaker 1: So while you may not want it to be, and
Speaker 1: I wish we lived in a reality in which the
Speaker 1: Israel component was in its proper place, in the framework
Speaker 1: of concentric circles of things that are you know, come
Speaker 1: close to you or should be, but currently is not.
Speaker 1: It takes a fuck load of your money, and it,
Speaker 1: just as I said, it is, has formed your the
Speaker 1: reality around you. The wars that have been gone on
Speaker 1: so much of our life has unfortunately been an effect
Speaker 1: of our fucked up relationship with Israel. So yeah, it's
Speaker 1: this whole idea of oh, within fucking circle. No, it's
Speaker 1: it's towards the middle. Unfortunately, I wanted to get to
Speaker 1: the outside, but to some extent you got to point
Speaker 1: it out and go, hey, this is fucked up what
Speaker 1: they're doing at the very least have that small amount
Speaker 1: of courage, and then hey, maybe maybe we can create
Speaker 1: a future where they are able to be towards on
Speaker 1: the outside that cirt. I can no longer think about
Speaker 1: them because, you know what, a few years before this, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I might make the occasional ju joke or whatever because
Speaker 1: I don't fucking care, but I was not talking about this.
Speaker 1: I was the whole Israel stuff. I've learned so much
Speaker 1: more about Israel and his spirit time I've become I
Speaker 1: wouldn't say an expert, but like maybe like a low
Speaker 1: level ex you know, or at least a you know,
Speaker 1: far more than the average person. I've learned a shitload
Speaker 1: about Israel in this period time, and that never, never, ever,
Speaker 1: ever would have been the case if it wasn't for
Speaker 1: their reaction to October seventh. So it is what it is,
Speaker 1: and frankly, now in retrospect, it's probably, like, you know what,
Speaker 1: probably should have been railing this shit a lot harder,
Speaker 1: a lot earlier. So all right, uh, scrolling through, see
Speaker 1: what else you guys say. Yeah, Temple might not be
Speaker 1: cuting the balls, but he's still sucking the dick exactly.
Speaker 1: You know, Boomer sooner uh baboo, all right, Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's not thing. He used to like him, and they
Speaker 1: kind of when they kind of fucked over anomally, he
Speaker 1: still pointed started pointing out things. I started really seeing it.
Speaker 1: He seems really douchey. Yeah, that's another thing. I mean,
Speaker 1: like he's definitely had some character flaws he's put out
Speaker 1: on the very forward and then like and I've tried
Speaker 1: to because frankly, I mean, as he's given me some
Speaker 1: opportunities and by extension, as I mentioned before, there was
Speaker 1: technically Casana McDonald that I really think was who I
Speaker 1: could you know, attribute that to But to some extent,
Speaker 1: like I want to give him the benefit of dell,
Speaker 1: but I've seen too many interactions with uh where he's
Speaker 1: acted like a massive fucking faggot. So it is really
Speaker 1: kind of the most frank way I can put it,
Speaker 1: and he kind of just fucking sucks. I mean, frankly,
Speaker 1: that's just kind of be upset about it. I get like, whatever,
Speaker 1: this is supposedly the largest what political live show they're
Speaker 1: live stream there is I don't really I mean from
Speaker 1: people I've known that have gone on and from the
Speaker 1: times I've gone on, and then being able to see
Speaker 1: that sorts of you know, boost people get as a result,
Speaker 1: and seeing that compared to other shows that I've seen
Speaker 1: me and other friends go on. I'm just telling you
Speaker 1: the impression IgA is that like that's not really the case,
Speaker 1: but even if it is, it's like, okay, cool, So
Speaker 1: we're supposed to just like all pretend you're not a
Speaker 1: fagot because of that. No, I'm sorry, I'm over it,
Speaker 1: especially in light of things I mentioned before. So whatever
Speaker 1: it is, what it is, I get it. Cool, I'm
Speaker 1: glad he keeps putting on great people. But whatever, I
Speaker 1: don't know. I so, but I am trying to avoid
Speaker 1: the instinct to get sucked into that sort of coverage
Speaker 1: because I know people do get law like shitting on
Speaker 1: other people, so I don't want to go that way.
Speaker 1: So I already just lost the what five minutes just
Speaker 1: now on that. So I just wanted to explain that
Speaker 1: because I know you're gonna show and all that shit.
Speaker 1: So that's where I'm coming from. I just kind of
Speaker 1: I did true a try to you have benefit of doubt.
Speaker 1: Maybe he's you know, good faith, but I just I
Speaker 1: struggle to believe this is a good faith person that
Speaker 1: isn't a coward or corrupted essentially, and I think it's
Speaker 1: kind of obviously pretty obviously he's kind of a fucking
Speaker 1: fagot I don't mean gay, and you know what that
Speaker 1: I'll say that real quick. On that front, I will say,
Speaker 1: I hope, I hope it gets better, and I think
Speaker 1: it very well might because he's a I know, he
Speaker 1: recently had a child, and I think that's a huge
Speaker 1: I mean, it's gonna be a huge that he changes
Speaker 1: a man a lot, so and I'm really happy for
Speaker 1: Hi in that regard, and you know what, and maybe
Speaker 1: in the future I really hope to maybe like come
Speaker 1: around and be like, you know what, Tim's really a
Speaker 1: cool guy. I've seen he's had some courage doing X
Speaker 1: Y and z uh and I hope, you know, children
Speaker 1: has that sort of positive effect on him. I feel
Speaker 1: like it did for me, so hopefully it does for him.
Speaker 1: I mean, I do think I don't know how how
Speaker 1: old is Tim. He's got to be older me. He's
Speaker 1: got to be either almost forty if not forty, and
Speaker 1: he's just now having his kids. So I think being
Speaker 1: a fucking young millionaire, you know, essentially you're kind of
Speaker 1: a rootless cosmopolitan despite the fact that you're like, oh,
Speaker 1: I want to live in the I want to live
Speaker 1: in the fucking country and shoot guns and act super rural.
Speaker 1: It's like, okay, but yeah, you're still kind of sort
Speaker 1: of living a degenerate lifestyle. You're getting sucked off by
Speaker 1: lydia and fucking in the closet or whatever the hell
Speaker 1: you guys are doing. Like, you guys are still kind
Speaker 1: of living a degenerate lifestyle, which is whatever, you're a
Speaker 1: single dude. But it's like that's going to have its effect,
Speaker 1: especially over a long period of time. And uh, I
Speaker 1: don't know, maybe we're maybe we'll get that now. But
Speaker 1: that's enough on him. Let's get into the good noes
Speaker 1: of today. This is Radis. I'll let her explain it.
Speaker 1: This is We've had some really great news. Obviously, I
Speaker 1: guess I say news, but nothing actually technically has happened.
Speaker 1: We just heard some more more lip service. But I
Speaker 1: like where this is going, and I hope it keeps going.
Speaker 1: So let's watch this. Well, will you pardon the people
Speaker 1: who are accused of the and to kidnap mischion Governor
Speaker 1: Cresha Wimmer.
Speaker 5: I'm going to look at it. I will take a
Speaker 5: look at it. It's been brought to my attention. I
Speaker 5: did watch the trial. It looked to me like somewhat
Speaker 5: of a railroad job.
Speaker 3: I'll be honest with you.
Speaker 5: It looked to me like some people said some stupid things.
Speaker 5: You know, they were drinking, and I think they said
Speaker 5: stupid things. But I'll take a look at that. And
Speaker 5: a lot of people are asking me that question from
Speaker 5: both sides. Actually, a lot of people think they got railroaded.
Speaker 5: A lot of people think they got railroaded, and probably
Speaker 5: some people.
Speaker 4: Well, I want to thank the President for drawing attention
Speaker 4: to this case. These men are innocent, and yes, they
Speaker 4: did say some stupid things while they were being followed
Speaker 4: around by a network of twelve FBI informants to undercover
Speaker 4: agents over a period of almost an entire year. They
Speaker 4: took these men out, They got them drunk, got them stone,
Speaker 4: and got them to basically say incendiary things, which is
Speaker 4: not illegal, by the way, But these men were completely
Speaker 4: railroaded at trial, they were denied their rights. Families have suffered.
Speaker 4: As far as I know, I'm the only person who's
Speaker 4: traveled across the country to interview not only the men
Speaker 4: that were charged in this case, but also the many
Speaker 4: unindicted co conspirators who never had their stories told. It
Speaker 4: was bigger than Michigan. They were trying to make this
Speaker 4: a multi state plot. There's a disabled Vietnam veteran in
Speaker 4: Virginia they were trying to target to go after Ralph Northam.
Speaker 4: The entire thing was a setup, and really it was
Speaker 4: designed to be in October surprise against the President in
Speaker 4: the twenty twenty election, to sway the election in a
Speaker 4: swing state. So I would be happy to brief the
Speaker 4: President on this case. I've actually gone and visited these
Speaker 4: men in prison. I'm the only person who's done that.
Speaker 4: I'm the only person who's in contact with all of
Speaker 4: these men, all the five that are still incarcerated, their families.
Speaker 4: So I'd like to thank the President for highlighting this
Speaker 4: case and hopefully pardoning these men.
Speaker 1: By the way, I see all you horny folks in
Speaker 1: the chat. I want you to know, is a very
Speaker 1: sweet girl, a nice lady, and she is a married woman,
Speaker 1: so leave her alone. She's a very nice lady though,
Speaker 1: but she's a very beautiful lady, so that is a
Speaker 1: but she but she does great work but you guys
Speaker 1: leave her alone. She has great work, but you definitely
Speaker 1: should be sharing and following her, but not for those reasons,
Speaker 1: because she's not gonna put any of that because she's
Speaker 1: a classy lady. But I did want to add into
Speaker 1: She did put up a little commentary. I don't know
Speaker 1: if the I don't know if the idea here is
Speaker 1: in this post, but I really wanted to just you
Speaker 1: read it. I don't know if the idea here, you know,
Speaker 1: obviously for the audio people who are like, what are
Speaker 1: you talking about? Because I haven't read it yet. But
Speaker 1: she put out a post here she says something to
Speaker 1: a co conspirator being a victim, implying Whitmer in this case.
Speaker 1: So I don't know if someone out there is saying
Speaker 1: that or she's just getting ahead of it, but I
Speaker 1: figured i'd get on it. I looked around a little
Speaker 1: bit to see if I saw that. Not in amuse
Speaker 1: with like eight minutes before, but I did want to
Speaker 1: get ahead of that because it does make sense. I'm like, oh,
Speaker 1: I could totally see that being the move. I did
Speaker 1: see some statements of some news counter to this move,
Speaker 1: and I think Whitmer made some sort of statement about
Speaker 1: something implying some sort of promise or something Trump made.
Speaker 1: I didn't even look into it because frankly, I don't
Speaker 1: really fucking care really what her opinion was. But at
Speaker 1: least I am aware that she's not she's not copping
Speaker 1: up to anything or she's not leaning into it, because
Speaker 1: I mean, if she was gonna be I think the
Speaker 1: smart move for her, I don't know. I actually don't
Speaker 1: even know how she could do a politically smart way
Speaker 1: to do this and still be, you know, somewhat benevolent ish.
Speaker 1: I don't really know how she handles that now that
Speaker 1: I'm thinking about it. But point being is, I think
Speaker 1: I could totally see her getting getting framed as a victim,
Speaker 1: and it almost seemed like she got a bamboozled by
Speaker 1: the fucking FBI or something. So I know, let's read
Speaker 1: this post real quick from Radix. She says, how can
Speaker 1: a co conspirator be a victim? Whitmer worked with the
Speaker 1: FBI to plan the recon of her vacation cottage. The
Speaker 1: FEDS installed cameras and the property advance of the recon
Speaker 1: they plan, So these are things they're coordinating with her.
Speaker 1: The second state trial, they got caught manipulating evidence. They
Speaker 1: spliced audio from the way back to make it appear
Speaker 1: Eric knew they were going in advance. Luckily, Eric's lawyer
Speaker 1: was smart and caught them fabricating evidence on the stand.
Speaker 1: The trial should have ended right there, then and there,
Speaker 1: but the judge allowed the FBI in the state of
Speaker 1: Michigan to lie and say it was an air and
Speaker 1: continue with a shamp. Eric was fully quitted along with
Speaker 1: the Null brothers. But I think she may have her
Speaker 1: finger on the pulse here that or she saw something
Speaker 1: that I'm not aware of. But I can totally see
Speaker 1: that being the move that they're gonna act like she
Speaker 1: was duped later, and I don't know, I mean some extent,
Speaker 1: I kind of hope she does go that route because
Speaker 1: then maybe that means that that feels like a, oh,
Speaker 1: I'm conceding too, that you can have this, because if
Speaker 1: she puts up a fight, then it might be like a, well,
Speaker 1: I don't know, maybe there's something here and you know,
Speaker 1: like I know, this is not a good look. And
Speaker 1: now we're dealing with a possible political political back and forth.
Speaker 1: Although I don't know either way, kind of now I
Speaker 1: think about it, I mean I guess I would prefer
Speaker 1: her to just kind of, you know, submit, I guess
Speaker 1: a little bit it would be the way to look
Speaker 1: at it, because then maybe we can get a move
Speaker 1: on this and get them out here or get them
Speaker 1: just go ahead. Geez, it's big old you guys. Hear
Speaker 1: that thunder by the way, just go ahead and full
Speaker 1: Just let you guys know in light of that it
Speaker 1: is piss pouring raining here again and thunder and lightning,
Speaker 1: so there's a solid chance to get cut out. So
Speaker 1: I haven't had any flickers and in power yet. I'm
Speaker 1: just warning you guys. But anyways, back to the lost
Speaker 1: damn add lost my lost my thread anyways, point being,
Speaker 1: I could totally see them most you know, making Whitmer
Speaker 1: make it try to frame her as it. But I
Speaker 1: don't know. I'm just trying to thinking. I'm thinking ahead,
Speaker 1: like which is the better route to go? So far
Speaker 1: as like do we want her to submit and kind
Speaker 1: of you know, you know, give into the narrative that like,
Speaker 1: oh this was, oh the FEDS did some untowards stuff,
Speaker 1: and you know there's because she doesn't need to go
Speaker 1: down with the ship. I mean, as Radix was getting
Speaker 1: at you know, we think she had her hand in it,
Speaker 1: but she could easily probably you know, find a way
Speaker 1: to skate out this. Now. I don't know. I think
Speaker 1: it might prefer that because I might make it easier
Speaker 1: for the boys. But on the flip side, so far
Speaker 1: as exposing the thing, if she does try to dig
Speaker 1: her heels in, I mean, I guess now you have
Speaker 1: two knit in two ways. You could have the maga,
Speaker 1: you know, a contingent then backs off and goes okay.
Speaker 1: I guess you're right, although I don't feel like that's
Speaker 1: very likely. I could be wrong. I could be disappointed.
Speaker 1: I feel like the political will is here. This seems
Speaker 1: like easy. Why not? That's kind of been my point
Speaker 1: from the BEG from forever. Same with Radis is that
Speaker 1: like it's kind of like a no brainer like thing
Speaker 1: for the Republicans. It's like, I don't know, maybe it
Speaker 1: almost but and this seems like the right time to
Speaker 1: do it too, because they're in a position where they
Speaker 1: can do this whole Oh well that was the other one,
Speaker 1: and they're kind of able to distance themselves from it.
Speaker 1: It's it's also less and it just feels the timing
Speaker 1: is right. But yeah, so I don't know. Let's see,
Speaker 1: we'll see hopefully, hopefully with the you know, something comes
Speaker 1: as I think it will either way, you know, we're
Speaker 1: at point being is as we see. I see a
Speaker 1: few different paths ahead of us. I see three main
Speaker 1: pass one being not very likely. I think it's not
Speaker 1: very likely that you know that that Trump you know,
Speaker 1: caves and decides not to but that's a possibility. And
Speaker 1: then you have the possibility of whitmer, you know, kind
Speaker 1: of submitting to the narrative along the you know, as
Speaker 1: being plied along the way, and you know, going, oh,
Speaker 1: I got fooled. And then we have the other where
Speaker 1: she digs in and goes, oh my god, how dare you,
Speaker 1: uh you even consider partying? People there, you know, tried
Speaker 1: to kill me or whatever. And then we get to
Speaker 1: dig in and then we get to do you know,
Speaker 1: online war. We get to go to town, we get
Speaker 1: to go, oh, look at this, look at that, look
Speaker 1: at this, look at that, and we get to get
Speaker 1: everyone focus on it. We got to get create a
Speaker 1: good political ship, storm around it and have a fun
Speaker 1: time and create a whole lot of exposing. So I
Speaker 1: don't know, either way, it's kind of the best I
Speaker 1: think you still also kind of maybe end up with
Speaker 1: the result you want there with possibly the pardon. Maybe
Speaker 1: I think it makes a little bit less likely doing
Speaker 1: that route, but I think you'll still get it. So
Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean, I think I think we're
Speaker 1: looking things are looking hopeful here, but uh, what's it?
Speaker 1: And also on the hey on, that looks like the
Speaker 1: Epstein front's looking up. Guys, I guess we're about to
Speaker 1: get some footage of Jeffrey Epstein. So go ahead, and
Speaker 1: everyone go to hop in the chat and go ahead
Speaker 1: and hit X. Go ahead and everyone type x in
Speaker 1: the chat X for doubt. But let's go ahead and
Speaker 1: play this video Dan Bongito and see what he has
Speaker 1: to say about a possible video coming out.
Speaker 7: In public interest. I'm just telling you what we see
Speaker 7: in the file.
Speaker 4: I am.
Speaker 7: I just want to be crystal clear on this. I
Speaker 7: am not asking anyone to believe me. I'm telling you
Speaker 7: what's there and what isn't right. There is nothing in
Speaker 7: the file at this point on the Epstein case, and
Speaker 7: there's going to be a disclosure on this coming shortly.
Speaker 7: We are working through some there is video that is
Speaker 7: something the public.
Speaker 1: Does a video of him killing himself.
Speaker 7: No, no, not not the actual act, but there the
Speaker 7: entire mcc bay. It was only one camera, there were
Speaker 7: other there's video that when you look at the video
Speaker 7: and we will release that's what's taken a while on this.
Speaker 7: We are working on cleaning it up to make sure
Speaker 7: you have an enhanced and we're going to give the
Speaker 7: originals so you don't think there are any shenanigans. You're
Speaker 7: going to see there's no one there but him. There's
Speaker 7: just nobody there. So I say to people, will tell
Speaker 7: if you have a tip, let us know.
Speaker 1: But there just me. Is he looking progressively worse day
Speaker 1: to day? I mean, I guess I never was looking
Speaker 1: at him day to day, but he just looks like
Speaker 1: more and more like those like photos that people look
Speaker 1: at and you go, oh my god, is he putting it?
Speaker 1: Look there's the seams on his face where his face
Speaker 1: is taped on. He's totally a lizard person like he's
Speaker 1: like he's just getting to He just looks like I
Speaker 1: don't know, like he got a cut of the drinachrome
Speaker 1: or something like he's just looking He's looking weird to me.
Speaker 1: I don't know. And that's been a comment I've heard
Speaker 1: from other people. Maybe it's just because we're all looking
Speaker 1: at Bongo now and he's a particularly unsightly man to
Speaker 1: begin with. I don't know. Let's keep going.
Speaker 7: There's no DNA, there's no audio, there's no fingerprints, there's
Speaker 7: no suspects, there's no accomplices, there's no tips, there is nothing.
Speaker 7: If you have it, I'm happy to see it. There's video,
Speaker 7: clear as day. He's the only person in there and
Speaker 7: the only person coming out. You can see it.
Speaker 1: So all right, well, let's let's explore this claim a
Speaker 1: little bit. Here's our brother, our buddy, Ken Silva says,
Speaker 1: there was only one camera recording on Epstein's floor, and
Speaker 1: this is what it showed. And I think I may
Speaker 1: have missed that, and you guys can go back and
Speaker 1: watch that. I'm pretty sure he even said something about
Speaker 1: a camera or one camera or something implying like, hey,
Speaker 1: this is only camera, and so this is the only camera.
Speaker 1: This is least as we're told. I guess we could
Speaker 1: come to find out. I'm not sure specifically sourcedj oig
Speaker 1: schematic drawing depicting the mcc New York shoe and the BOP.
Speaker 1: So I guess this is I'm assuming this from some
Speaker 1: previous other drop of some sort. I'm not sure exactly.
Speaker 1: Either way, we have we have you can see right
Speaker 1: here this is what Ken sheared. He says, it's a
Speaker 1: field of view of the shoe camera at tenth floor,
Speaker 1: soelth enterance. And now that we know, I mean, obviously
Speaker 1: we could come to he could come out with some
Speaker 1: other camera and go, oh, we were lying or something,
Speaker 1: because this is based off previous information, so it would
Speaker 1: be bizarre. Another one comes out at this point because
Speaker 1: I mean, I think how long I mean, what what
Speaker 1: did When did this Epstein stuff pop off? It was like, God,
Speaker 1: we're we're gonna be nearing a decade of like I
Speaker 1: don't know it, maybe last maybe I can't remember how
Speaker 1: long this has been. Like so this is these things
Speaker 1: have been litigating, gone through and so like we've gone
Speaker 1: some information. This is some of the information. So it
Speaker 1: was claimed at some point. Hey, this is what you got,
Speaker 1: and so now we can I'll show you right here.
Speaker 1: You can see what they would see right here. You
Speaker 1: see you see a door, you see a couple doors.
Speaker 1: So let's zoom in on this. You can see, God
Speaker 1: damn it, you can see Epstein's cell right here, this
Speaker 1: red box. And then you see the camera right here,
Speaker 1: and it's pointing to over you. The field of view
Speaker 1: right here is opposite. So the doors we're seeing over
Speaker 1: here right here are these door two doors opposite of
Speaker 1: Epstein's cell. And I guess maybe you might be able
Speaker 1: to say you have actually know that these doors right here,
Speaker 1: so they lead look like those lead into another holding
Speaker 1: bay of some sort. You see what I would assume
Speaker 1: or cells here. I mean maybe one of these are
Speaker 1: doors to another area. I'm not sure, so, I mean,
Speaker 1: this looks like just based on the schematic, to me,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure if these are doors to something else
Speaker 1: or if that's where that spot ends. But it looks
Speaker 1: like to me that like the entrance comes through here. Obviously,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry for the audio listeners. You're gonna kind of
Speaker 1: be missing out a little bit here, but it looks
Speaker 1: like you come through here over here. I don't know,
Speaker 1: you guys can see the cursor right. I can never
Speaker 1: tell if you guys can see the when I'm on it,
Speaker 1: but either way, on the I guess bottom right hand corner,
Speaker 1: you can see what looks like what I would presume
Speaker 1: like the entrance door coming through that whole area that
Speaker 1: looks like the whole area I would assume coming in
Speaker 1: like through the main ish entrance is not seen, and
Speaker 1: then perfectly a little area you can duck into to
Speaker 1: see Epstein. Now it does look like there are some
Speaker 1: sort of stairs there in the field of view, So
Speaker 1: maybe you can make the argument that, like you would
Speaker 1: the idea of someone would walk up those stairs and
Speaker 1: that you would probably see their head poking, you would
Speaker 1: see them if they had to come through. But I
Speaker 1: don't know. It almost looks like there's some sort of
Speaker 1: like it's a stairs that goes into some sort of
Speaker 1: I don't know, is that like, is that like a
Speaker 1: thing you can actually know. We can use this as
Speaker 1: example because he sings me or each other, so that
Speaker 1: what we're seeing right now is kind of a is
Speaker 1: what his would look like, So this is what his
Speaker 1: area look like. This is a different view, so this
Speaker 1: is very much what his would look like. So we
Speaker 1: see stairs here and ah, well maybe not, I'm just
Speaker 1: trying to make sense of this. So actually, yeah, it
Speaker 1: looks like there's almost like a a railing, so it's
Speaker 1: a slight step up maybe what like a four foot
Speaker 1: rays or more to these stairs or something maybe five feet.
Speaker 1: But the point being is you could It looks like
Speaker 1: to me you could come into the main entrance hop
Speaker 1: over railings if we're judging by this photo, and you
Speaker 1: could just you could probably maybe slip in. I don't know,
Speaker 1: maybe I mean you would have maybe you could get
Speaker 1: like a I would say, there's like maybe a little
Speaker 1: area like the tiniest of a cunt here of a
Speaker 1: split of a second, or maybe they could see your
Speaker 1: head or something. But it just seems like this could
Speaker 1: just judging by this view, you could probably fool this,
Speaker 1: slip around it, maybe do a fraction of a second
Speaker 1: where the thing is spliced out. Which that's another component
Speaker 1: about this. You know, with this, what just yesterday or
Speaker 1: just a day before? I think this was not yesterday,
Speaker 1: was Todayay is Friday, so I think it was like
Speaker 1: Wednesday ish. I started seeing Oliver in Twitter and a
Speaker 1: lot of people made note of this is all the
Speaker 1: I guess we got some new AI or something, And
Speaker 1: I guess the big thing about this is a super
Speaker 1: duper duper realistic videos. So apparently we've made it to
Speaker 1: basically deep fakes. I mean, some of them are like
Speaker 1: if you know, they're kind of borderline on Canny Valley,
Speaker 1: but not really even that over the top. They really
Speaker 1: are like you could get fooled. So they've getten to
Speaker 1: the point it seems like they've gone to the point
Speaker 1: where they are like only on Canny Valley for the perceptive,
Speaker 1: and so it's like we're getting into weird territory. So
Speaker 1: that dropped. Keep in mind, I mean, I don't know
Speaker 1: if you guys caught bonding and talking about cleaning it
Speaker 1: up and then then quickly going oh, well, we'll give
Speaker 1: you the original too, like okay, but what was the original?
Speaker 1: Was the original already had like a a second split
Speaker 1: that way, because as I'm saying, looking at this, I
Speaker 1: do think there's a if the door is where I
Speaker 1: think it is, it looks like maybe there would be
Speaker 1: like a moment where like maybe like a second or
Speaker 1: two where like the head or something would be visible
Speaker 1: if they were trying to enter Epstein's Bay. But I
Speaker 1: could be entirely wrong. I mean, but just looking the
Speaker 1: schematic that there's clearly a huge blind spot. So it's like, hey,
Speaker 1: uh yeah, I think they may literally try to trot
Speaker 1: out this footage and go Hey, there's nobody in view
Speaker 1: during these you know, during these this time stamps or whatever.
Speaker 1: So clearly no one came in, not not giving you
Speaker 1: the information. This is a factual but not truthful type stuff,
Speaker 1: because they will go, we'll probably frame it in a
Speaker 1: way of like to the furthest of our knowledge and
Speaker 1: blah blah blah. You know you can see here be
Speaker 1: purely implausibleh blah blah blah blah blah. It's like you
Speaker 1: could you could probably make the case that it's like
Speaker 1: in order for someone to come in, they would have
Speaker 1: to then because those stairs, as I point out, you
Speaker 1: can see someone have to come in and walk up
Speaker 1: the stairs, and so I guess you would have that
Speaker 1: split moment. But as I said before, I think you
Speaker 1: can just hop the rail. So it's like, I don't know,
Speaker 1: But my point being is I could see them easily
Speaker 1: framing this it's like, oh, look, we got you. Meanwhile, no,
Speaker 1: it looks like someone could probably just walk right in
Speaker 1: through the main entrance, hop over a railing and possibly
Speaker 1: slip in. At most maybe looks like to me they
Speaker 1: may have to pull off some sort of cover up
Speaker 1: where they somehow patch over like maybe a second or
Speaker 1: two of footage where his head would pop into the frame.
Speaker 1: It's about it where someone's head would pop in the frame.
Speaker 1: So yeah, wild stuff this is. But let's uh, let's
Speaker 1: keep going and then on that too. Then we have
Speaker 1: our buddy buddy John Cleebol pointing out, look at this
Speaker 1: fucking absolute unit. This is the guy who was his
Speaker 1: cell mate that had already been like what tried to
Speaker 1: choke him out like what like a week or so
Speaker 1: prior when then they had what I think they had
Speaker 1: even leaked it out as like the initial reports kind
Speaker 1: of framed it as a sounding like a possible suitice
Speaker 1: side attempt, almost intentionally borderline amidding information kind to find
Speaker 1: out later now he got strangled by his uh by
Speaker 1: this guy and then yeah, then later this guy dies
Speaker 1: by uh hanging later. And this is a cop that uh,
Speaker 1: this is a this is a corrupt quadruprale murdering drug
Speaker 1: trafficking cop. So this guy is yeah, he murdered. This
Speaker 1: is a trug draft who killed four fucking guys and
Speaker 1: he was a dirty working for the cops. So this
Speaker 1: guy is a Hey, this guy is a dirty agent.
Speaker 1: He is the guy that you get to do this
Speaker 1: sort of shit. So yeah, I'm sure everything's completely completely
Speaker 1: you know, you know, completely in good standing, all toward
Speaker 1: you know, all all nice over there at the FBI.
Speaker 1: Nothing nothing hiding, nothing over there, broken hyoid bone, says
Speaker 1: the mega nerd. Here for sure. All right, let's scroll through.
Speaker 1: See what all you guys gotta say. Yeah, that man
Speaker 1: staring at the floor, that man shook tim about Bongino. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there was another one too that I almost feel grossy,
Speaker 1: but watching there was a who was it, Buddy Ken
Speaker 1: share this one vide where he made some sort of
Speaker 1: weird statement about divorce or something, and it just seem
Speaker 1: like I'm just skinning. I'm be honest, I'm getting really
Speaker 1: fucking sick of these videos where I see Bongino going, Oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: I tell you, I come in, I come in his
Speaker 1: seven o'clock in the morn, I come in to seven
Speaker 1: o'clock in the morning. I'm out of here eight pm.
Speaker 1: And you know what, cash gosh, he's I can hear
Speaker 1: him from my I can hear him from my room,
Speaker 1: and he's there thirty minutes before I am. He's doing
Speaker 1: push ups on the floor, and holy fuck, you wouldn't
Speaker 1: believe how committed. We are like, shut the fuck up.
Speaker 1: No one has to, like, you don't have to do
Speaker 1: this unless you're doing weird like because the thing is,
Speaker 1: it's like it clearly it seems like the play was
Speaker 1: whoever powers or are out there is like we're going
Speaker 1: to use the goodwill that Cash and Dan have developed
Speaker 1: over their period of time as being you know, I
Speaker 1: don't know media, people, personalities or whatever, and now we're
Speaker 1: going to leverage that. And you know what, I think
Speaker 1: it's all burnt and they're trying to squeeze milk every
Speaker 1: last little bit out of that there is, try to
Speaker 1: you know, squeeze every little bit of false concern or
Speaker 1: like wow, he's such a great guy or whatever. But
Speaker 1: it's like, you know what, if you were if that
Speaker 1: was the case, you wouldn't have to be telling me
Speaker 1: it like you do you do, And even then it's
Speaker 1: it just feels feminine, it feels gay, And I think
Speaker 1: people see that, especially when that when you're a character
Speaker 1: such as Dan and even Cash, I think to a
Speaker 1: lesser degree, which clearly a big part of their their
Speaker 1: their persona is tied into their machismo. They're like, I'm
Speaker 1: a big man. I think it was I think it
Speaker 1: wasn't like a it was bunge, you know, like a
Speaker 1: Green Beret or something. I forget what he was. He
Speaker 1: was under a secret service. I mean, Cash is a lawyer,
Speaker 1: so it's kind of a little bit gayer when it's
Speaker 1: coming from him. It's like, you're not really a tough guy.
Speaker 1: But I mean whatever point being is like, they're kind
Speaker 1: of like, Hey, we're tough guys, and we're we've been
Speaker 1: fighting the good fight and we've been we've been on
Speaker 1: your side and we've been doing this and it's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: but we see what you're doing and this only goes
Speaker 1: so far. And it's like, if you're doing this, cry
Speaker 1: for me. My job. My life is so hard. It's
Speaker 1: so hard that you guys made me the head of
Speaker 1: the largest domestic intel or one of the head of
Speaker 1: the ATF and my buddy the head of the largest
Speaker 1: domestic or domestic intelligence agency in the United States. It's like,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm sorry, this all this like, oh, I fucking
Speaker 1: fall asleep with my boots on type fucking you know,
Speaker 1: Paul Bunyan. Shit, I'm sorry, get out of here. Uh
Speaker 1: come to me with actions and results and things done.
Speaker 1: And stop with the excuses, because that's one hundred percent
Speaker 1: what this looks like sounds like excuses. It reminds me
Speaker 1: of my grandmother complaining about her ailments. That's what it
Speaker 1: reminds me of. And I'm it's it's old, it's gross,
Speaker 1: it's just frankly kind of pathetic, and I'm I'm kind
Speaker 1: of tired of seeing it from someone who tries to
Speaker 1: masquerade as some sort of semblage of masculinity. So especially
Speaker 1: with all these fucking annoying boomers and people, I mean,
Speaker 1: I guess Luckily I don't. I don't feel like the
Speaker 1: new generation has fallen to that, So luckily we don't.
Speaker 1: We're not dealing with like a Jordan Pearson crisis here
Speaker 1: where like young men are like who do I look
Speaker 1: to now? Because I mean, who the fuck was We're
Speaker 1: looking at Bongino. But I don't know. I guess it's
Speaker 1: just a don't don't wear don't wear my fucking uh what,
Speaker 1: don't wear my masculinity as a what a prom dress?
Speaker 1: Or whatever the fuck that meme is. It's like that
Speaker 1: that's my I don't know whatever, there's a meme there.
Speaker 1: I just can't think of it. All right, let's go
Speaker 1: with the chat. Bungino said, he's the only one to
Speaker 1: come out. Yeah, good morning, MJ. Waller, Thank you. He says, like,
Speaker 1: if you like, just for the title of the screen
Speaker 1: of the of the of the stream. Only one camera
Speaker 1: on the cell block, just like there was only one
Speaker 1: camera the pentagon at nine to eleven, uh, scrolling through.
Speaker 1: So why did if someone says, why did they report
Speaker 1: the camera turned off? If it didn't, because I think
Speaker 1: there was another camera. There was a there was another camera.
Speaker 1: I don't I don't have a tab up for that,
Speaker 1: but I could have. It just seemed extraneous for the
Speaker 1: purpose of this presentation. But they there was another camera
Speaker 1: that there was another separate like slide of like what
Speaker 1: I just showed you that shows other camera and where
Speaker 1: we should have shown and there was another camera that
Speaker 1: was supposed to look right at his cell and that
Speaker 1: one is the one that was I don't know if
Speaker 1: it was the off for that day. I forget the
Speaker 1: specific on that, but it wasn't operational at least at
Speaker 1: that time.
Speaker 7: Uh.
Speaker 1: And if they were serious, I would give rowf footage
Speaker 1: of every camera. Yeah, I guess, because there's probably other
Speaker 1: cameras within the building, so you would be yeah, because
Speaker 1: at that point you would be able to at least
Speaker 1: researchers out there could be able to literally map who's
Speaker 1: coming in and out of the building in every area.
Speaker 1: Although that would be I guess kind of a lot
Speaker 1: to give all of that. I don't know, Maybe there
Speaker 1: might be some legality issues. The real video we want
Speaker 1: to see the destroyed and never existed. They're just trying
Speaker 1: to wait out the hype. Yeah, really very very easy
Speaker 1: to fake low quality video. So yeah, that's well, that's
Speaker 1: the thing, Like the these this fucking AI stuff come up,
Speaker 1: So are they going to I kind of doubt, I really,
Speaker 1: really really really doubt they're going to trot out a fake.
Speaker 1: I think what they're going to do is trot out
Speaker 1: the real thing, and maybe, and just maybe maybe, like
Speaker 1: I said, there might be like a you know, a
Speaker 1: frame that's cut out or something like that. But the
Speaker 1: chances that I think any nerds will catch up, will
Speaker 1: pick up on that or notice it, I think are
Speaker 1: probably not very likely. Although I don't know, I don't
Speaker 1: know how this nerd shit works, But at the point
Speaker 1: being is I wouldn't be surprised if if they just
Speaker 1: give us that video, I doubt they're going to give
Speaker 1: us a complete fake. That would be kind of insane
Speaker 1: to me. I just don't know, especially because it's almost
Speaker 1: like these guys play the consent game and this is
Speaker 1: and you know, I feel like they would have all
Speaker 1: he come out with this maybe too, if they had
Speaker 1: something like that. I don't fucking know it just I
Speaker 1: just feel like I feel in my bones the play
Speaker 1: is release the actual tape after kind of you know,
Speaker 1: dragging on time, and then freem it in a way
Speaker 1: of like, oh see, you can clearly tell that it's
Speaker 1: it's not very likely anyone came in and out of
Speaker 1: that bay during this period of time. And it's like
Speaker 1: that's technically true. It's technically a true statement, but it's
Speaker 1: kind of leaving out some key information. As I just
Speaker 1: point out to you, Uh Merrimack said, I did say
Speaker 1: Tim did say something interesting, Elijah. What if they said
Speaker 1: he committed suicide and when the pyramidics got there, they
Speaker 1: did the deed. And if they said when the Pyramids
Speaker 1: got there, that's true, that's a good point. I mean
Speaker 1: I didn't hear him say that, but yeah, that's one
Speaker 1: theory that I think I've heard around too, So scrolling through, see, hey,
Speaker 1: what's up, Jay Brooks. Yeah, say release a full video,
Speaker 1: I mean full video, twenty four hours interrupted with all
Speaker 1: verifiable comings and goings. Yeah you would think, I mean,
Speaker 1: just have like a clear idea of anyone who came
Speaker 1: in out. But yeah, Syrir Marnin Maac says, yes, the
Speaker 1: fuck up. Just do your job and don't tell me
Speaker 1: how great you are. In fact, I prefer not to
Speaker 1: hear from you, Dan in Cash exactly. Yeah, uh, how
Speaker 1: about just release the Epstein files, you fucking faggots. No,
Speaker 1: I will say, you point out with malet Cope, don't
Speaker 1: don't talk shit about manlets or we're pro manlets here
Speaker 1: as I looked a jose for my masculine archetype. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm a manlet. I hate to break that for you.
Speaker 1: I'm five foot five, two hundred pounds and my six
Speaker 1: pack is coming in right now, so that's not but
Speaker 1: not too bad for a little guy. All right. Uh so, yeah,
Speaker 1: I got like a four pack right now, pretty solid one.
Speaker 1: It's coming in, dude, and I'm actually like one ninety
Speaker 1: five right now. I've been leaning out, I've been getting
Speaker 1: ready for bro Grove. I'm ready to catch a coal
Speaker 1: or raving for slipping. I will say my physique is
Speaker 1: not ready in like a If they don't slip up,
Speaker 1: I don't think I can catch them. But if i'm
Speaker 1: I'm like right on their tails, I think within a month.
Speaker 1: With the way I'm working out and dieting right now,
Speaker 1: I think I'm maybe, I think I might be able
Speaker 1: to catch one of them in the physique competition we're
Speaker 1: doing at pro Grove. If if at the rate I'm on,
Speaker 1: and if one of them gets sloppy goes nuts, I know,
Speaker 1: you know, one of them just got off a cruise.
Speaker 1: Who knows. Maybe one of them just get fucking really
Speaker 1: into weed and fucking eat a shitload. But I've been
Speaker 1: doing really good. I've been eating really good, but basically
Speaker 1: on a fucking dairy and meat diet basically and uh
Speaker 1: maybe with occasional vegetable. And I've been I was too
Speaker 1: twenty at one point, not too long ago. I fucking
Speaker 1: leaned up, been working out regularly. I'm fucking I'm gonna
Speaker 1: be ripped for bro Grove, I'm telling you. But anyways,
Speaker 1: I don't know why I went into that. I just
Speaker 1: wanted to. I just want to say how sexy I am.
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, I see you guys making a tower so
Speaker 1: you can't spell up manlet without the man Jose under
Speaker 1: five foot five crew one hundred percent baby short power,
Speaker 1: short power, all right. Uh, These tough boy, tough guy
Speaker 1: dude bros are all cringe. If you were that tough,
Speaker 1: you wouldn't have to tell me all the shit you
Speaker 1: do to stay hard. Yeah, which is kind of what
Speaker 1: I was driving the other day when we were on
Speaker 1: Tower Gang, which for those of you guys that walk it,
Speaker 1: we were watching. We were talking shit about Philip Bonte's
Speaker 1: little shooting video, which is like it's that's what it's.
Speaker 1: It reminds me of like workout videos, which I mean
Speaker 1: I used to be really big into like I was
Speaker 1: like basically like a powerlifter. I mean my most I
Speaker 1: squatted six twenty five. I've deadlifted, you know, five fifty
Speaker 1: five bench three fifty five. I think it is the
Speaker 1: most ever got. So I was pretty fucking big. But
Speaker 1: it was like I never really was the guy who
Speaker 1: like posts workout videos or lifts, but it was like,
Speaker 1: I don't know, it was always I always noticed the
Speaker 1: commonality of those who do was always like kind of
Speaker 1: the scrawny guys. It just seems it's like a try
Speaker 1: hard thing, which is to some extent you go you
Speaker 1: don't want to make fun of it to some extent
Speaker 1: because you're like but some extent you're like, dude, shit
Speaker 1: the fuck up it. Just do the work, Like, just
Speaker 1: do the work and that's all you gotta do. And
Speaker 1: when you're doing the work, people see you do the
Speaker 1: work and they recognize and they go, oh shit. Whereas
Speaker 1: when you're the guy posting like, oh, here's this lift,
Speaker 1: here's that, and you know, people go people just like
Speaker 1: I don't you don't have to like convince people that
Speaker 1: you're a badass. You just kind of just are, you know.
Speaker 1: And that's because there is like this phase I think
Speaker 1: now there's a phase I think when people do like lifting,
Speaker 1: where they might be doing it just because they're trying
Speaker 1: to get into it, trying to get it's fun, it's whatever,
Speaker 1: but like come to a certain point where like, all right, dude,
Speaker 1: you're being a little bit of a faggot, like just
Speaker 1: do the work, and like people will be like, holy shit,
Speaker 1: just look at this guy. They'll just notice you don't
Speaker 1: have to post the videos, and if anything, the videos
Speaker 1: just look gay from anyone looking outside in so don't
Speaker 1: do it. And it's the same thing with the shooting.
Speaker 1: And it's the same thing with these cash cash betel
Speaker 1: and fucking It's that same vibe. It's just just just
Speaker 1: do it, like like I don't need to know, like
Speaker 1: you're trying way too hard. Now if you're showing this
Speaker 1: god awful like shooting video where you clearly probably aren't
Speaker 1: doing a very good job, it's like, I mean, I
Speaker 1: don't know, I don't know much about guns, but you
Speaker 1: didn't seem like you were doing well. It's the same
Speaker 1: thing as like when someone posts like a I don't
Speaker 1: know something benching like one thirty five look oh fucker,
Speaker 1: and they're like whoo and in the gym and stuff,
Speaker 1: you're like, come on, dude, you're trying way too hard.
Speaker 1: You're making a spectacle of this. It's it's kind of sad,
Speaker 1: so please stop. Uh all right, it'scrolling through, do do
Speaker 1: do get there a top about me, tell me some
Speaker 1: six for four hundred eight pounds. Dude, if I've posted
Speaker 1: a lifting video, I'd get roasted so hard exactly. And
Speaker 1: you shouldn't. It's weird. Just go work out, like you
Speaker 1: don't need to tell everyone about it, like be a
Speaker 1: grown man, you know, be a man. All right, let's
Speaker 1: move on to the next story. All right, I think
Speaker 1: this will probably be where I finish it out. I
Speaker 1: do have a couple other ones to shoot on the
Speaker 1: FBI to kind of really drive home my point of
Speaker 1: why they suck balls, just kind of like I did today.
Speaker 1: But I think you guys get the crucks. I really
Speaker 1: don't need to drive that point home any harder, but
Speaker 1: I did want to take a moment to finish this
Speaker 1: out to hone in on something kind kind of bummer,
Speaker 1: a little bit of a bummer. They got him, They
Speaker 1: got him, fellas Glenn Greenwald. He is, you're gonna see
Speaker 1: doing the interwebs. I'm just gonna warn you. I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna play this. I'm not gonna play this. I'll show
Speaker 1: you the still. You can see the still. That's Glenn
Speaker 1: Greenwald right there, head down. We're in a it's kind
Speaker 1: of like a guess supposed to be some sort of
Speaker 1: sexy schoolgirl outfit or something thingy. Yeah, I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: warn you guys. You guys see that don't watch it.
Speaker 1: It's weird. Now, I will say, is if anyone was
Speaker 1: surprised to find out that, like Glenn Greenwall was a
Speaker 1: gay man and as gay man, they probably typically are
Speaker 1: in some pretty weird stuff. I mean, like, how do
Speaker 1: you even do gay sex without doing weird stuff? So
Speaker 1: is anyone really surprised? But this is clearly obviously a
Speaker 1: result of his reporting of him. You know, probably maybe
Speaker 1: he's reporting on Israel. That would be pretty on the nose.
Speaker 1: I know he does. He speaks truth to power to
Speaker 1: a lot of things. I guess he's a pretty big
Speaker 1: I think he's in Brazil is where he's at, so
Speaker 1: I think he's pretty well known for actually being involved
Speaker 1: in politics there. So I mean he has many into me.
Speaker 1: So it's not that crazy. I think this has been released,
Speaker 1: But I do think there's something people should be aware of.
Speaker 1: I mean, while I was kind of debating in my
Speaker 1: head whether I should even bring this up because like
Speaker 1: I'm drawing attention to it, but I think kind of
Speaker 1: the best way to really kind of honestly really steal
Speaker 1: power from it is just kind of be honest and
Speaker 1: forthcoming about it. Say this is out there. I don't
Speaker 1: think it's that big of a deal. Obviously, I see
Speaker 1: this and I you know, I watch this video and
Speaker 1: go fucking weird, dude, that's gross. I mean, I'll be
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna lie that. I'd be lying to you
Speaker 1: if I didn't say, there's some judgment that crosses my
Speaker 1: mind when I see a man behaving in such a
Speaker 1: way as I was just kind of flaming on you know,
Speaker 1: many other men during today, and I have similar thoughts
Speaker 1: when I see a man, what is in this video
Speaker 1: kneeling for another man, and I think he gets spit
Speaker 1: on during it. He's kind of like sucking his thumb
Speaker 1: doing kind of like very over the top. But like
Speaker 1: you know, at the end of the day, Gren's guns
Speaker 1: on a lot of great work. Now, I will say
Speaker 1: there is I would say this is the part of
Speaker 1: the reason why I felt like this is worth bringing up,
Speaker 1: because obviously it's an example of clearly someone doing good
Speaker 1: work and you know, suffering the consequence like this wouldn't
Speaker 1: be getting exposed to the world if he didn't make
Speaker 1: some enemies, whether it was in his parting in Israel
Speaker 1: or something along those lines. So I think it's worth
Speaker 1: mentioning there also, I think it's also worth mentioning because
Speaker 1: what is what does this mean? What is the implications
Speaker 1: of this?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 1: Like you got to think if someone releases this, I mean,
Speaker 1: did they really really really think that the Internet was
Speaker 1: going to be that upset to come to find out that,
Speaker 1: you know, Glenn Greenwald has some weird kinks, not particularly,
Speaker 1: I mean, I mean, I don't know, I kind of
Speaker 1: I struggle to buy that they really thought that. So
Speaker 1: I'm frankly maybe a little bit concerned this could be
Speaker 1: some sort of warning shot, although I have no idea.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm not at all trying to imply Glenn
Speaker 1: Greenwald has been involved in anything I know we had
Speaker 1: talked about before I have. I think it's worth mentioning
Speaker 1: if anyone is looking into possibilities of Glenn Greenwald ever
Speaker 1: interacting in any sort of untoward way, or being having
Speaker 1: any sort of control over him or anything. I mean,
Speaker 1: there is the example to point two of the intercept,
Speaker 1: although he ended up leaving the intercept, So for those
Speaker 1: who are unaware, I believe I forget who he's working
Speaker 1: for when he did the because he's Glen Greenwaald's obviously
Speaker 1: the Juliasans guy, he's got to go the Julia Soans scoop.
Speaker 1: He did all that stuff. Shortly after all of that,
Speaker 1: he got the kind of like a you know, an
Speaker 1: offer that you can't refuse. Essentially is how it was
Speaker 1: kind of frammed, I believe from the intercept and now
Speaker 1: the intercept. The key thing to think about here is
Speaker 1: who owns the intercept. Apparently the intercept was owned by
Speaker 1: I forget some fucking Derka derca you know, dot head type,
Speaker 1: fucking name, can't remember it. I forget his name, but
Speaker 1: he is like one of the main PayPal mafia guys,
Speaker 1: like one of the guys clicked in with Elon and Teal,
Speaker 1: and he was the guy who he's working for now. Also,
Speaker 1: during that period of time, a whole bunch of confidential
Speaker 1: sources got burned. And keep in mind, what Greenwald's probably
Speaker 1: most notable for is having the most confidential of sources.
Speaker 1: Maybe not confidentially be the right way to put it,
Speaker 1: most sensitive of sources, I guess you could say in
Speaker 1: the whole Julian massage thing. So he then became the
Speaker 1: guy that people went to for these sort of things.
Speaker 1: He developed a knack for it. And then a lot
Speaker 1: of these guys got burned, and you look at the
Speaker 1: ownership structure of and I think there's more to the
Speaker 1: story too. That really does seem like they clearly I
Speaker 1: think they even might even be like a court trial
Speaker 1: that you know, kind of unveiled some of this stuff.
Speaker 1: I covered it forever ago, but either way, it's worth
Speaker 1: worth noting, now, do I you know? With that the
Speaker 1: kind of obviously the implication there is like Grant Great
Speaker 1: Glenn Grant Glenn Green while got bought by these people
Speaker 1: you know, were or was working for them. That was
Speaker 1: kind of like his I think he kind of was
Speaker 1: like the guy who sort of started it. But I
Speaker 1: believe the fund if I recall correctly, but I believe
Speaker 1: the funding was through the Dirk a Dirker guy or whatever,
Speaker 1: who is essentially just straight up PayPal mafia guy. So
Speaker 1: where was I going with that?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 1: Anyways, Yeah, So obviously it kind of looks like there's
Speaker 1: a possibility of some sort of untwards behavior of him
Speaker 1: or something maybe being a know, although I see that
Speaker 1: in the way I interpret that is that there's a
Speaker 1: very strong possibility of he got hoodwinked essentially, like you know,
Speaker 1: someone goes, hey, here's someone who's doing great work, you know,
Speaker 1: exposed a bunch of stuff. Let's buy him, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: and then you and I don't know, maybe he should have,
Speaker 1: you know, thought oh, this, you know, offers too good
Speaker 1: to be true. But I don't know, maybe it was
Speaker 1: just kind of like, okay, maybe it is, but whatever,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna always not give a shit and burn this
Speaker 1: if I have to at a moment. And you know what,
Speaker 1: I guess he ended up leaving the intercepts. So you
Speaker 1: could make the case of, hey, maybe he did know
Speaker 1: full well when he's stepping into and he thought like
Speaker 1: he could handle it and just kind of walk away anytime.
Speaker 1: And he did end up walking away. So I don't know,
Speaker 1: I have no idea, but the very least I could
Speaker 1: just we can tell from Glenn Greenwall's body of work,
Speaker 1: the stuff he's covered, he's been a hero on this
Speaker 1: Israel topic. I mean, are we really do we really
Speaker 1: carey his gay? I don't. I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 1: Obviously I don't agree with I mean, he's a lefty
Speaker 1: and I don't agree with a lot of stuff from
Speaker 1: Glen Greenwald, Like I couldn't care less Greenwald Glen Greenwald's gay, So,
Speaker 1: but I do think it's worthwhile knowing that this is
Speaker 1: out there. The very least this is how did these
Speaker 1: people act? So, I mean think people do need to
Speaker 1: be aware of this, you know, for whether you're someone
Speaker 1: who wants to enter this sphere to be on guard,
Speaker 1: think about your past, whether you're a consumer of such,
Speaker 1: to maybe come across you know, think about this stuff
Speaker 1: in a different light and be aware this stuff could
Speaker 1: come out. I mean, I don't know. I mean, obviously,
Speaker 1: also there is the I hope there's nothing darker coming out,
Speaker 1: although I don't know. I've never seen anything for Playing
Speaker 1: World to suggest anything darker, so I don't know, I
Speaker 1: doubt it. I'll just I just find it odd that
Speaker 1: someone released this, unless it's just get like just kind
Speaker 1: of a flustered whatever. We don't have anything on him,
Speaker 1: but you just want to really just kind of make
Speaker 1: him feel uncomfortable, because the very least like the objective
Speaker 1: you could say that was probably you know, accomplished by
Speaker 1: this is I'm sure Glenn Greenwald feels uncomfortable. I'm sure
Speaker 1: he feels this isn't the sort of thing, you know,
Speaker 1: It's obviously this is super inappropriate. I think this is
Speaker 1: really wrong that someone releases the world. I think it's
Speaker 1: fucked up. So I mean, I guess I'm kind of
Speaker 1: sharing it here, but I do think it's worth while
Speaker 1: being aware. This is the type of way they act.
Speaker 1: This is what they do. They try to shame good people,
Speaker 1: and it's like there's a possibility that there was no
Speaker 1: no actual real what's the word like goal, like actual
Speaker 1: tactical goal aside from upsetting Glenn Greenwald. And that's how
Speaker 1: many of these players operate. And it's pretty gross. So
Speaker 1: I don't know, I just think it's worth what, you know,
Speaker 1: as much as we talk about, you know, sexual blackmail
Speaker 1: and stuff on the show, I think it's worthwhile highlighting
Speaker 1: example of it. So and also kind of warning you guys.
Speaker 1: You guys might go and see that on your inner
Speaker 1: webs today, Ignore that, because I don't know who really
Speaker 1: wants to see that. So I'm just going ahead and
Speaker 1: the only reason I watch it for you guys. And
Speaker 1: even then, I didn't turn the volume on and I
Speaker 1: didn't watch the whole thing because I but all right, guys,
Speaker 1: let's go ahead and get out of here. Let's roll
Speaker 1: through the chat real quick, see what you got to say,
Speaker 1: and then we'll bounce. Oh we got all videos are suppose.
Speaker 1: I mean, just imagine pointing a camera at yourself, right.
Speaker 1: I don't even know what that's about, but yeah, what
Speaker 1: a weirdo.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: Glenn Greenwald has always been a FED since Gerald Hall. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't know. Uh yeah, the intercept has always been
Speaker 1: a controlled up. Perhaps, I don't know. Uh, scrolling through
Speaker 1: it seems anything else you guys have to say. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you were saying, Okay, Steph's get yucky hay. Yeah, I'm
Speaker 1: not a big fan of it.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 1: So someone says, wasn't it posted from his count originally?
Speaker 1: If so, that's insane. That's not what I've heard. If
Speaker 1: that means if it was posted from his count, there
Speaker 1: was either a big ol' oopsie from him or someone
Speaker 1: hacked his account and posted, which that is. Now that
Speaker 1: would make more sense for like, as I was saying earlier,
Speaker 1: of like an objective of like, if you're trying to
Speaker 1: make him feel uncomfortable, hack his account and release incredibly
Speaker 1: sense of information, that's some pretty messed up stuff. So
Speaker 1: obviously I don't know that's the case. I'm just going
Speaker 1: off with the chat just told me, uh all right,
Speaker 1: So yeah, bingo Jose PayPal, I'm mafia. See there you go. Yep.
Speaker 1: So I'm aware of it. I don't know what to
Speaker 1: take mean of it. So it's ninety percent of the
Speaker 1: Julia sonefiles were never released, according to Gerald. Hey, guys
Speaker 1: like this Edward's Noden guy. Yeah, I mean maybe You're
Speaker 1: probably correct, don't. I don't know. I've never really I
Speaker 1: never got too deep into that story. I just know
Speaker 1: that stuff, so it definitely it definitely makes me raise
Speaker 1: my eyebrows and be concerned. So scrolling through, so I
Speaker 1: love anyone who's critical vis reeling for their case. Is
Speaker 1: Gerald after all, that the headline should be lefty journal
Speaker 1: big gay. So yeah, everyone's making I guess some of
Speaker 1: you guys are making that. People are making point in
Speaker 1: there about that that the guy was black. I mean, although,
Speaker 1: to be fair, I think his husband was black. I
Speaker 1: mean I don't I'm not saying that was his husband,
Speaker 1: but like, and also, I don't necessarily have a problem
Speaker 1: with people interracial or whatever whatever you're into. Again, I
Speaker 1: have a right leaning chat, but I don't care. But anyways, yeah,
Speaker 1: I think I'm not sure. I'm not saying I know
Speaker 1: that was his husband, but I'm pretty sure his husband's
Speaker 1: a darker fellaw, so it could have been his husband,
Speaker 1: which would make it a little bit. I mean, definitely
Speaker 1: was weird, but I guess sure if that's a if
Speaker 1: that's between your husband, I guess I'll let the let
Speaker 1: that one slide a little bit more. Not that I
Speaker 1: was ever really not letting it slide, but uh, it's
Speaker 1: less weird, I guess. Uh, all right, scrolling through, All right, yeah,
Speaker 1: let's go and get out of here. Man, I'm I
Speaker 1: am so I'm on the verge of taking my shirt
Speaker 1: off where it's so hot. It's just now starting to
Speaker 1: heat up from this. Uh, there's no ac existence I'm
Speaker 1: dealing with right now. But with that, guys, we're gonna
Speaker 1: go ahead and get out of here. If you want
Speaker 1: to support the show and not chipping the buck going
Speaker 1: over to pay or not, that's retarded. That's if you
Speaker 1: want to chip in buck. If you if you don't
Speaker 1: want to chip in a buck, like share, subscribe, comment,
Speaker 1: leave a five star, and mute iTunes Spotify. I was
Speaker 1: gonna also follow me on Twitter at targeting Jose because
Speaker 1: you know, give or take about fifty percent of the
Speaker 1: stuff I Cravilyn. The show's usually from you guys. So
Speaker 1: if you guys want to craft this show, that's one
Speaker 1: way you can do it. It helps me out a lot.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of stories going on in any given time,
Speaker 1: especially these days, so it helps to have eyes and
Speaker 1: ears out there. But if you do want to directly
Speaker 1: support the show, and the best way you possibly really
Speaker 1: can with money, going over to patron dot com SA
Speaker 1: No Way Jose, twenty twenty. The lowest level is two bucks,
Speaker 1: and at that level you get access to early episodes.
Speaker 1: Currently I have four behind the paywall, I have one
Speaker 1: at will five sort of four and a half. I
Speaker 1: have one about to drop in like thirty minutes, so
Speaker 1: go check that out. I just draw. I am currently
Speaker 1: in the midst of about to dropping a wake the
Speaker 1: this there are follow up me and Austin's follow up
Speaker 1: to our Waco episode. This is where we get into
Speaker 1: the weird Waco stuff. I call it Waco weirdness. I
Speaker 1: think you guys will enjoy that. There's like four other ones.
Speaker 1: There's a Trow episode in there. We're starting a series.
Speaker 1: There's a you know hop, a live reading. There's a
Speaker 1: you know, there's some you know, digging into more of
Speaker 1: Wendy painting or some Wendy paintings new research. So there's
Speaker 1: a bunch of stuff behind there for you guys to
Speaker 1: check out. I try to do about one to two
Speaker 1: a week and put those behind the paywall for you guys.
Speaker 1: Uh and those come out weeks later, so you're getting
Speaker 1: got You guys are getting access to content weeks before
Speaker 1: the public. And then also you can add free RSS
Speaker 1: feed and you also get a priority for me in
Speaker 1: Austin's Weekly Call show, which is live on Tuesdays at
Speaker 1: nine thirty pm Eastern. That's already dead. You can call
Speaker 1: in there and you get access to the pre che
Speaker 1: or the pre show too. But yeah, at the highest
Speaker 1: levels my sponsors, to read them off every episode is
Speaker 1: a big thank you them. I'm mcoson tagging at Targging Toad,
Speaker 1: also at Abrigate D's at zo v r A c
Speaker 1: k at rescripting Physical tim title at John Cleebold, Will
Speaker 1: Bells this is BlueBay Rabbi win big fan of the
Speaker 1: show to me and then Jordan Peterson, big thank you
Speaker 1: know them for supporting the show. And with that I'm
Speaker 1: out of here, tell me, says, I'm already out of here.
Speaker 1: I already pay you. I'm out of here, I'm already
Speaker 1: pay you. You sure do, Thank you, and with that
Speaker 1: we're out deuces. By bye.