WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.960 --> 00:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Big food and be on with Cliff and Bubo. These

2
00:00:09.080 --> 00:00:12.439
<v Speaker 1>guys are your favorites, so like to say subscribe and

3
00:00:12.640 --> 00:00:16.199
<v Speaker 1>raid it live star s and me.

4
00:00:18.120 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 2>Grates on us today.

5
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:25.359
<v Speaker 3>And listening watching Lin always keep its watching.

6
00:00:26.640 --> 00:00:30.399
<v Speaker 2>And now you're hosts Cliff Barrickman and James Bubo Fay,

7
00:00:31.199 --> 00:00:32.359
<v Speaker 2>Hey Bobes. What's happening?

8
00:00:32.600 --> 00:00:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Hey Cliff? How much? How's it going?

9
00:00:34.399 --> 00:00:36.840
<v Speaker 2>It's going alright, just be another beautiful day hanging out.

10
00:00:37.079 --> 00:00:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Gonna talk to a great guest today about a great

11
00:00:38.920 --> 00:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>subject I'm kind of excited about. But we should probably

12
00:00:41.679 --> 00:00:43.479
<v Speaker 2>let Darby talk about that. So why don't we just

13
00:00:43.479 --> 00:00:45.960
<v Speaker 2>bring Darby on and we'll start talking. How you doing Derby?

14
00:00:46.280 --> 00:00:47.399
<v Speaker 3>Hi, I'm doing well?

15
00:00:47.439 --> 00:00:50.520
<v Speaker 2>How are you good? All right? Pushing forward? So thank

16
00:00:50.560 --> 00:00:52.119
<v Speaker 2>you so much for coming on, and you have such

17
00:00:52.159 --> 00:00:55.640
<v Speaker 2>an exciting project here. But before we get going on that,

18
00:00:56.479 --> 00:00:59.079
<v Speaker 2>I was looking up. I was gonna try to familiarize

19
00:00:59.119 --> 00:01:02.840
<v Speaker 2>myself with your biography. And the nearest I correct me

20
00:01:02.840 --> 00:01:04.599
<v Speaker 2>if I'm wrong, but the nearest I can figure is

21
00:01:04.640 --> 00:01:07.359
<v Speaker 2>you're kind of You're a librarian of some sort. You're

22
00:01:07.400 --> 00:01:10.719
<v Speaker 2>a research of a variety of subjects, and it seems

23
00:01:10.719 --> 00:01:14.040
<v Speaker 2>like you're a facilitator more than say an instructor or

24
00:01:14.040 --> 00:01:15.799
<v Speaker 2>something like that. Is that is that correct? That a

25
00:01:15.840 --> 00:01:19.319
<v Speaker 2>good way to categorize you. Well, I am an instructor

26
00:01:19.359 --> 00:01:24.040
<v Speaker 2>as well. Yeah, I'm on faculty at North Carolina State University.

27
00:01:24.719 --> 00:01:29.319
<v Speaker 2>My primary faculty appointment is as a librarian. But as

28
00:01:29.519 --> 00:01:31.680
<v Speaker 2>as you know, Cliff, not not doing the sorts of

29
00:01:31.719 --> 00:01:33.680
<v Speaker 2>things that most people think of when you think of

30
00:01:33.719 --> 00:01:38.359
<v Speaker 2>a librarian. But also I do teach, and I am

31
00:01:38.640 --> 00:01:42.640
<v Speaker 2>very much involved with research and my work as a librarian,

32
00:01:42.799 --> 00:01:47.560
<v Speaker 2>especially for many many years, my job has been to

33
00:01:47.719 --> 00:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>help put together and support highly interdisciplinary research teams to

34
00:01:53.159 --> 00:01:57.319
<v Speaker 2>tackle really tough questions. So to put together the right

35
00:01:57.400 --> 00:02:01.079
<v Speaker 2>people and to help translate between feel in such a

36
00:02:01.120 --> 00:02:07.000
<v Speaker 2>way that people can deal with real world issues that

37
00:02:07.680 --> 00:02:12.039
<v Speaker 2>require expertise that's coming from a number of different areas.

38
00:02:12.479 --> 00:02:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Now that is this is this is your role here

39
00:02:15.560 --> 00:02:19.280
<v Speaker 2>needed Because the disciplines don't tend to speak to one another.

40
00:02:19.479 --> 00:02:24.639
<v Speaker 3>That is sometimes the case. Experts in different disciplines oftentimes

41
00:02:24.840 --> 00:02:27.879
<v Speaker 3>either don't know how to speak to one another or

42
00:02:27.919 --> 00:02:32.080
<v Speaker 3>sometimes don't realize that they're asking questions along similar lines

43
00:02:32.159 --> 00:02:35.240
<v Speaker 3>or about similar subjects in ways where they could be

44
00:02:35.280 --> 00:02:40.639
<v Speaker 3>working together and getting further that way. Sometimes they don't

45
00:02:40.680 --> 00:02:44.120
<v Speaker 3>know how to speak one another's language, and so I

46
00:02:44.159 --> 00:02:50.520
<v Speaker 3>play this role of matchmaking and translating and facilitating.

47
00:02:51.000 --> 00:02:54.919
<v Speaker 2>For you. You must be kind of familiar with a

48
00:02:55.159 --> 00:02:59.159
<v Speaker 2>huge number of disciplines then to even know what's going

49
00:02:59.240 --> 00:03:00.840
<v Speaker 2>on to any of them, realize that there might be

50
00:03:00.840 --> 00:03:02.639
<v Speaker 2>connections that could be made between them.

51
00:03:02.879 --> 00:03:08.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, very much so. In fact, I'm usually the person

52
00:03:08.240 --> 00:03:13.599
<v Speaker 3>in the room who knows the most about everything and

53
00:03:13.800 --> 00:03:15.919
<v Speaker 3>the least about any given subject.

54
00:03:17.520 --> 00:03:19.039
<v Speaker 2>I am also one of those people, which is why

55
00:03:19.039 --> 00:03:21.599
<v Speaker 2>I became an elementary school teacher. I was pretty good

56
00:03:21.599 --> 00:03:26.000
<v Speaker 2>at everything, but not really great at anything in your

57
00:03:26.039 --> 00:03:29.039
<v Speaker 2>career path or in your personal life, because obviously these

58
00:03:29.080 --> 00:03:33.159
<v Speaker 2>things intersect on a regular basis for everyone. What led

59
00:03:33.280 --> 00:03:37.120
<v Speaker 2>you down the path to sasquatch Well?

60
00:03:37.639 --> 00:03:41.039
<v Speaker 3>I had been teaching courses for a number of years,

61
00:03:41.080 --> 00:03:46.000
<v Speaker 3>and particularly been teaching courses about how science works. Not

62
00:03:46.159 --> 00:03:49.199
<v Speaker 3>just the sorts of things that say you might have

63
00:03:49.280 --> 00:03:53.520
<v Speaker 3>taught your students in elementary school of how science says

64
00:03:53.560 --> 00:03:59.240
<v Speaker 3>it works, no hypothesis and testing and experimentation, those sorts

65
00:03:59.280 --> 00:04:04.759
<v Speaker 3>of things, but also culturally speaking, how science works. What

66
00:04:04.840 --> 00:04:10.280
<v Speaker 3>are the economic structures that underlie scientific research. What are

67
00:04:10.319 --> 00:04:14.719
<v Speaker 3>the ways that people communicate with one another, How do

68
00:04:14.800 --> 00:04:17.839
<v Speaker 3>scientists communicate with the general public as well as with

69
00:04:17.920 --> 00:04:23.680
<v Speaker 3>one another, with funding agencies, with government, with industry, and

70
00:04:23.720 --> 00:04:28.959
<v Speaker 3>how science scientific discoveries are applied in the real world.

71
00:04:29.480 --> 00:04:33.199
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot that goes into science that oftentimes

72
00:04:33.199 --> 00:04:37.680
<v Speaker 3>even scientists are not fully aware of themselves. And so

73
00:04:38.040 --> 00:04:41.040
<v Speaker 3>I've been teaching classes on that for a great many years,

74
00:04:41.839 --> 00:04:45.279
<v Speaker 3>and I came upon this idea that I thought would

75
00:04:45.279 --> 00:04:51.160
<v Speaker 3>be really interesting of looking at fringe sciences or people

76
00:04:51.240 --> 00:04:57.120
<v Speaker 3>doing scientific work in areas that are oftentimes not considered

77
00:04:57.639 --> 00:05:02.199
<v Speaker 3>science that might be might be referred to as pseudoscience

78
00:05:02.360 --> 00:05:05.959
<v Speaker 3>or dismissed in that way, And I thought it would

79
00:05:05.959 --> 00:05:09.480
<v Speaker 3>be very interesting to teach a course and this is

80
00:05:09.519 --> 00:05:12.560
<v Speaker 3>what I started doing that looked at some of these

81
00:05:12.680 --> 00:05:18.319
<v Speaker 3>areas and ask these questions of why are these subjects

82
00:05:18.480 --> 00:05:23.800
<v Speaker 3>dismissed by quote unquote mainstream science or the general public.

83
00:05:24.240 --> 00:05:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Are they being dismissed for good reason? What can that

84
00:05:28.160 --> 00:05:31.879
<v Speaker 3>teach us about the ways that we make decisions, the

85
00:05:31.920 --> 00:05:37.519
<v Speaker 3>ways that cultural aspects play into our scientific questions and practices.

86
00:05:38.120 --> 00:05:41.720
<v Speaker 3>And so I started engaging with some of these fields,

87
00:05:42.240 --> 00:05:49.079
<v Speaker 3>including the field of sasquatch research or sasquatch investigation, and

88
00:05:50.000 --> 00:05:52.279
<v Speaker 3>it was very very interesting to me, and one of

89
00:05:52.360 --> 00:05:54.759
<v Speaker 3>the things that I really wanted to do with my

90
00:05:54.879 --> 00:05:59.079
<v Speaker 3>students was to challenge them to look at the very

91
00:05:59.199 --> 00:06:04.240
<v Speaker 3>best evidence in each of these areas, because, as you know,

92
00:06:05.040 --> 00:06:08.879
<v Speaker 3>there are lots of people making lots of claims, and

93
00:06:08.920 --> 00:06:13.319
<v Speaker 3>you can find lots of silly things in any of

94
00:06:13.360 --> 00:06:19.480
<v Speaker 3>these fringe or paranormal or edge science fields. You can

95
00:06:19.480 --> 00:06:22.959
<v Speaker 3>find plenty of things to make fun of, but it's

96
00:06:23.040 --> 00:06:27.519
<v Speaker 3>much more challenging to deal with the best potential evidence

97
00:06:27.759 --> 00:06:31.480
<v Speaker 3>in these areas and see what it says. Because any

98
00:06:31.879 --> 00:06:37.040
<v Speaker 3>potential evidence is actually evidence of something. So the question is, really,

99
00:06:37.480 --> 00:06:38.959
<v Speaker 3>let's figure out what it is.

100
00:06:39.519 --> 00:06:41.240
<v Speaker 4>Do you have a list of the best evidence that

101
00:06:41.240 --> 00:06:42.800
<v Speaker 4>you're going to focus on right now?

102
00:06:43.360 --> 00:06:45.879
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I think that there are a number

103
00:06:46.040 --> 00:06:51.759
<v Speaker 3>of areas where there are interesting questions to be asked

104
00:06:51.959 --> 00:06:57.639
<v Speaker 3>with regard to potential sasquatch investigation. In my current study,

105
00:06:58.120 --> 00:07:01.000
<v Speaker 3>the one that I'm leading with my colleagues now that

106
00:07:01.040 --> 00:07:04.959
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about today, I really wanted to look at

107
00:07:05.079 --> 00:07:11.639
<v Speaker 3>the physical biological evidence that could potentially yield DNA, and

108
00:07:11.680 --> 00:07:15.040
<v Speaker 3>the reason for that is that DNA is really the

109
00:07:15.160 --> 00:07:20.639
<v Speaker 3>gold standard for the establishment of a species. And that

110
00:07:21.000 --> 00:07:24.319
<v Speaker 3>is of course one of the big questions, or one

111
00:07:24.319 --> 00:07:30.279
<v Speaker 3>of the big hypotheses, that the sasquatch phenomenon could potentially

112
00:07:30.519 --> 00:07:36.519
<v Speaker 3>be explained at least in large part by a unique

113
00:07:37.000 --> 00:07:41.839
<v Speaker 3>biological species. You don't know unless you look at the evidence,

114
00:07:41.920 --> 00:07:46.120
<v Speaker 3>unless you examine the evidence what it is. And that's

115
00:07:46.160 --> 00:07:49.079
<v Speaker 3>something that I found was that there were people who

116
00:07:49.079 --> 00:07:52.079
<v Speaker 3>were finding hairs, that were people who were finding other

117
00:07:52.160 --> 00:07:57.160
<v Speaker 3>sorts of physical samples, and they were asking me, where

118
00:07:57.480 --> 00:07:59.959
<v Speaker 3>can I send to have this tested? How do I

119
00:08:00.199 --> 00:08:02.920
<v Speaker 3>how do I go about that? And I really found

120
00:08:02.959 --> 00:08:07.720
<v Speaker 3>that I couldn't find a commercial labor or a university

121
00:08:07.839 --> 00:08:11.480
<v Speaker 3>or any any anywhere really that I could really feel

122
00:08:11.480 --> 00:08:14.079
<v Speaker 3>confident saying, yeah, this is the place to send this

123
00:08:14.680 --> 00:08:20.000
<v Speaker 3>if you have a potential unknown And so that's why

124
00:08:20.079 --> 00:08:23.920
<v Speaker 3>I got together a team and created that myself with

125
00:08:23.959 --> 00:08:24.480
<v Speaker 3>his study.

126
00:08:25.000 --> 00:08:30.160
<v Speaker 2>So this is a university sponsored study, Is that correct? Well,

127
00:08:30.199 --> 00:08:34.360
<v Speaker 2>it's university sponsored in the sense that most studies are

128
00:08:35.200 --> 00:08:40.000
<v Speaker 2>university sponsored. What that means really is that in this case,

129
00:08:40.320 --> 00:08:45.320
<v Speaker 2>there are there are four of US faculty colleagues who

130
00:08:45.440 --> 00:08:50.720
<v Speaker 2>have who are collaborating on this, and who have set

131
00:08:50.720 --> 00:08:56.039
<v Speaker 2>the scope and the parameters of the study. And we

132
00:08:56.120 --> 00:09:01.120
<v Speaker 2>are all on faculty at NC State University, so it's

133
00:09:01.240 --> 00:09:04.919
<v Speaker 2>university sponsored in that sense. The other thing is is

134
00:09:04.960 --> 00:09:09.120
<v Speaker 2>that it is a it is an official study. And

135
00:09:09.159 --> 00:09:13.360
<v Speaker 2>so I've gone through the paperwork. I had to go

136
00:09:13.440 --> 00:09:19.360
<v Speaker 2>through what we call Institutional Review Board approval, which is

137
00:09:19.399 --> 00:09:23.879
<v Speaker 2>our ethics committee that make sure that when we do

138
00:09:24.039 --> 00:09:30.120
<v Speaker 2>any research that we are treating both both humans and

139
00:09:30.200 --> 00:09:36.360
<v Speaker 2>animals with respect and care and properly ethically. So you

140
00:09:36.639 --> 00:09:38.559
<v Speaker 2>had to fill out probably a mountain of paperwork for

141
00:09:38.600 --> 00:09:41.720
<v Speaker 2>this thing and then somehow still squeeze it back, squeeze

142
00:09:41.720 --> 00:09:44.960
<v Speaker 2>it through rather knowing that this is kind of a

143
00:09:45.039 --> 00:09:49.399
<v Speaker 2>sasquatch study, but you couldn't put sasquatch in the forefront, right,

144
00:09:49.440 --> 00:09:51.840
<v Speaker 2>So how did you get around that? You know this

145
00:09:52.159 --> 00:09:52.559
<v Speaker 2>is and.

146
00:09:52.480 --> 00:09:56.519
<v Speaker 3>This isn't a sasquatch study, and what we're really interested

147
00:09:56.559 --> 00:09:58.919
<v Speaker 3>in in this case and this is what the name

148
00:09:58.960 --> 00:10:03.879
<v Speaker 3>of the study is. It's a study of allegedly morphologically

149
00:10:04.279 --> 00:10:10.799
<v Speaker 3>anomalous physical samples. So what does that mean? Basically, that

150
00:10:11.000 --> 00:10:17.039
<v Speaker 3>means this is a study of biological specimens that people

151
00:10:17.039 --> 00:10:23.519
<v Speaker 3>have found that they claim have unusual traits or unusual appearances,

152
00:10:23.679 --> 00:10:27.600
<v Speaker 3>or something unusual about them, and that is what we're

153
00:10:27.639 --> 00:10:34.360
<v Speaker 3>studying now. This comes from my own hearing and talking

154
00:10:34.440 --> 00:10:41.559
<v Speaker 3>with folks, particularly in the Bigfoot community, who have found samples,

155
00:10:42.120 --> 00:10:47.519
<v Speaker 3>for example, found hair samples that folks who are actually

156
00:10:47.720 --> 00:10:52.240
<v Speaker 3>very good at identifying hair of known species in North

157
00:10:52.279 --> 00:10:58.840
<v Speaker 3>America cannot identify. There are certain properties to these hairs

158
00:10:59.159 --> 00:11:04.519
<v Speaker 3>that they reportedly have in common, and yet they don't

159
00:11:04.600 --> 00:11:10.000
<v Speaker 3>look like those of known species. That's an interesting question.

160
00:11:10.759 --> 00:11:14.440
<v Speaker 3>What are these So these are the types of questions

161
00:11:14.440 --> 00:11:18.360
<v Speaker 3>that we're trying to answer. What are these things? Every

162
00:11:18.440 --> 00:11:23.600
<v Speaker 3>physical sample that will be submitted to us is a

163
00:11:23.720 --> 00:11:28.080
<v Speaker 3>sample of something we don't know what it is unless

164
00:11:28.120 --> 00:11:30.600
<v Speaker 3>we look at it. Why wouldn't we want to look

165
00:11:30.600 --> 00:11:31.039
<v Speaker 3>at these?

166
00:11:32.879 --> 00:11:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Stay tuned for more Bigfoot and Beyond with Cliff and

167
00:11:35.960 --> 00:11:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Bogo will be right back after these messages. So three

168
00:11:44.200 --> 00:11:46.679
<v Speaker 2>to six months doesn't seem like a long time right

169
00:11:47.759 --> 00:11:49.799
<v Speaker 2>in Bigfoot Land. It's not very long because we've been

170
00:11:49.799 --> 00:11:52.919
<v Speaker 2>looking for sasquatches for decades and decades and decades. But

171
00:11:53.039 --> 00:11:54.600
<v Speaker 2>when you think about what can happen in three to

172
00:11:54.679 --> 00:11:56.919
<v Speaker 2>six months, Like, what would you do in three to

173
00:11:56.960 --> 00:11:59.039
<v Speaker 2>six months? I'm going to give me six months go

174
00:11:59.679 --> 00:12:02.320
<v Speaker 2>squad of course, of course, And how much do you

175
00:12:02.320 --> 00:12:04.639
<v Speaker 2>think is going to get done during that time in

176
00:12:04.679 --> 00:12:06.399
<v Speaker 2>squatch and you're going to see one in six months?

177
00:12:06.639 --> 00:12:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Probably not, But in three to six months, what you

178
00:12:09.480 --> 00:12:11.639
<v Speaker 2>can see if you're not going to see a sasquatch

179
00:12:11.799 --> 00:12:16.919
<v Speaker 2>is thicker, fuller hair regrown from Hymns our sponsor. Hymns

180
00:12:17.159 --> 00:12:18.960
<v Speaker 2>not bad for just three to six months.

181
00:12:19.200 --> 00:12:22.000
<v Speaker 4>What if you start using Hymns now in six months,

182
00:12:22.039 --> 00:12:25.039
<v Speaker 4>just imagine that thick, full crop up there.

183
00:12:25.399 --> 00:12:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

184
00:12:25.600 --> 00:12:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Because Hymns will give you a convenient access to a

185
00:12:28.320 --> 00:12:31.120
<v Speaker 2>range of hair loss treatments that work all from the

186
00:12:31.120 --> 00:12:32.080
<v Speaker 2>comfort of your couch.

187
00:12:32.440 --> 00:12:35.120
<v Speaker 4>They make it pretty simple, man. They use real doctors,

188
00:12:35.399 --> 00:12:40.480
<v Speaker 4>it's clinically proven ingredients on they use like finesteride and monoxaville.

189
00:12:40.720 --> 00:12:42.840
<v Speaker 2>And I love that. I had no doctor visits because

190
00:12:42.879 --> 00:12:44.919
<v Speaker 2>first of all, doctors, who wants to go see a doctor?

191
00:12:45.000 --> 00:12:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Nothing personal doctors. But also you make an appointment now

192
00:12:47.279 --> 00:12:49.799
<v Speaker 2>you get in August or something forget that. So this

193
00:12:49.879 --> 00:12:53.600
<v Speaker 2>process is simple and one online. And I know you

194
00:12:53.600 --> 00:12:55.519
<v Speaker 2>have access to the internet because you're listening to us

195
00:12:55.559 --> 00:12:56.000
<v Speaker 2>right now.

196
00:12:56.320 --> 00:12:58.480
<v Speaker 4>You can pick how you want to do it, like chewbowles,

197
00:12:59.000 --> 00:13:03.320
<v Speaker 4>oral spray, serum treatments, whatever, whatever you want. I mean,

198
00:13:03.320 --> 00:13:06.559
<v Speaker 4>they can work with you in customersage, with your preferences.

199
00:13:06.840 --> 00:13:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like it could be a one time thing, it

200
00:13:08.480 --> 00:13:11.679
<v Speaker 2>could be ongoing care. No insurance is needed at all,

201
00:13:11.720 --> 00:13:14.519
<v Speaker 2>and it's all at one low price and that covers

202
00:13:14.639 --> 00:13:17.519
<v Speaker 2>everything from these treatments to the ongoing care if you

203
00:13:17.559 --> 00:13:18.159
<v Speaker 2>so choose.

204
00:13:18.519 --> 00:13:20.279
<v Speaker 4>Well, nonway, I said, the proofson the pudding, and there's

205
00:13:20.360 --> 00:13:23.240
<v Speaker 4>hundreds of thousands of subscribers that trust it and you

206
00:13:23.399 --> 00:13:25.879
<v Speaker 4>give it positive reviews. So there you go.

207
00:13:25.960 --> 00:13:31.120
<v Speaker 2>There's your pudding, thick hairy pudding. Search your free online

208
00:13:31.200 --> 00:13:33.679
<v Speaker 2>visit today at hymns dot com slash beyond.

209
00:13:34.159 --> 00:13:39.879
<v Speaker 4>That's hi ms dot com slash beyond for your personalized

210
00:13:39.879 --> 00:13:41.159
<v Speaker 4>hair loss treatment options.

211
00:13:41.519 --> 00:13:45.159
<v Speaker 2>Hymns dot com slash beyond results vary based on studies

212
00:13:45.159 --> 00:13:48.679
<v Speaker 2>of topical and oral monoxidal and finasteride Prescription products required

213
00:13:48.679 --> 00:13:51.320
<v Speaker 2>an online consultation with a healthcare provider who will determine

214
00:13:51.320 --> 00:13:54.600
<v Speaker 2>if prescription is appropriate. Restrictions apply. See website for full

215
00:13:54.639 --> 00:13:56.240
<v Speaker 2>details and important safety information.

216
00:13:57.639 --> 00:14:00.600
<v Speaker 3>So at this point what we've done. We just launched

217
00:14:00.720 --> 00:14:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the online intake survey at the tail end of May,

218
00:14:06.919 --> 00:14:11.399
<v Speaker 3>so we started. We've had a trickle of offers coming

219
00:14:11.440 --> 00:14:14.679
<v Speaker 3>in thus far, and it's just started to pick up

220
00:14:14.720 --> 00:14:19.440
<v Speaker 3>over the last couple of weeks. So at this stage,

221
00:14:20.000 --> 00:14:23.679
<v Speaker 3>as of this recording, I am starting to reach out

222
00:14:24.200 --> 00:14:28.080
<v Speaker 3>to those folks, starting to arrange brief interviews with them.

223
00:14:28.600 --> 00:14:31.759
<v Speaker 3>I have some questions to learn and make sure that

224
00:14:31.840 --> 00:14:35.679
<v Speaker 3>we understand a bit more about the samples and the

225
00:14:35.720 --> 00:14:39.600
<v Speaker 3>circumstances under which they were found, and then at that

226
00:14:39.840 --> 00:14:43.960
<v Speaker 3>point we'll be giving those folks instructions as to how

227
00:14:44.039 --> 00:14:49.720
<v Speaker 3>to physically submit the samples that we're prioritizing at this time.

228
00:14:50.360 --> 00:14:56.919
<v Speaker 3>So I imagine that certainly by early September or so,

229
00:14:57.080 --> 00:15:00.639
<v Speaker 3>I imagine we will have the first sam bulls in

230
00:15:00.799 --> 00:15:04.240
<v Speaker 3>hand on campus and in the lab.

231
00:15:04.639 --> 00:15:07.879
<v Speaker 2>So let's think about it from a user perspective first,

232
00:15:08.000 --> 00:15:11.960
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll talk about it from the mechanical side.

233
00:15:12.000 --> 00:15:15.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess your side of things. So if someone likes say,

234
00:15:15.360 --> 00:15:19.759
<v Speaker 2>I found sasquatch footprints and they went by a tree,

235
00:15:19.840 --> 00:15:21.919
<v Speaker 2>and there were a number of strange hairs on the tree,

236
00:15:22.360 --> 00:15:25.480
<v Speaker 2>and I collected them. Now of course, I'm perhaps slightly

237
00:15:25.519 --> 00:15:28.039
<v Speaker 2>better equipped than your average Joe in the forest. I

238
00:15:28.080 --> 00:15:30.159
<v Speaker 2>would put these underneath the microscope and take a look

239
00:15:30.159 --> 00:15:32.600
<v Speaker 2>at them. If I couldn't easily identify them as bear

240
00:15:32.759 --> 00:15:35.399
<v Speaker 2>deer or anything like that, and I wanted to submit them,

241
00:15:35.960 --> 00:15:38.240
<v Speaker 2>what would I do? Well, what you would.

242
00:15:37.960 --> 00:15:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Do is you would you would go to the intake

243
00:15:42.080 --> 00:15:44.279
<v Speaker 3>survey form that's online.

244
00:15:44.000 --> 00:15:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And by the way, we will have that. We

245
00:15:45.480 --> 00:15:47.600
<v Speaker 2>will have that link in the show notes below, so

246
00:15:47.600 --> 00:15:49.120
<v Speaker 2>anybody who wants to take a look at it, whether

247
00:15:49.120 --> 00:15:50.679
<v Speaker 2>you have samples or not, the link will be in

248
00:15:50.679 --> 00:15:51.519
<v Speaker 2>the show notes below.

249
00:15:51.840 --> 00:15:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much for that. I appreciate y'all getting

250
00:15:54.600 --> 00:15:57.360
<v Speaker 3>the word out. So the first thing you would do

251
00:15:57.519 --> 00:16:00.360
<v Speaker 3>is fill out well, I mean, the worst thing you

252
00:16:00.360 --> 00:16:03.919
<v Speaker 3>would do, obviously is collect the sample. And folks ask me, hey,

253
00:16:03.960 --> 00:16:07.960
<v Speaker 3>what's the best way to collect the sample? And there

254
00:16:07.960 --> 00:16:12.720
<v Speaker 3>are certainly lots of folks out there who describe good

255
00:16:12.759 --> 00:16:15.879
<v Speaker 3>techniques for sample collection, But the most important things to

256
00:16:15.960 --> 00:16:19.320
<v Speaker 3>do are to try to collect the sample if you can,

257
00:16:20.639 --> 00:16:25.120
<v Speaker 3>in a sterile way, so with sterile gloves or sterile instruments.

258
00:16:26.360 --> 00:16:29.399
<v Speaker 3>Most samples, if they're hair or something like that, something

259
00:16:29.399 --> 00:16:32.960
<v Speaker 3>that isn't moist wet, you know, like blood or something,

260
00:16:33.559 --> 00:16:37.320
<v Speaker 3>but hairs. Most of the samples that folks are offering

261
00:16:37.360 --> 00:16:41.200
<v Speaker 3>thus far, it's best to collect those into a paper

262
00:16:41.919 --> 00:16:46.720
<v Speaker 3>envelope and stick them in the refrigerator or the freezer.

263
00:16:48.279 --> 00:16:51.320
<v Speaker 3>So that's the best way to store samples. Collect and

264
00:16:51.399 --> 00:16:56.840
<v Speaker 3>store samples. So then you would fill out the online survey,

265
00:16:58.039 --> 00:17:01.799
<v Speaker 3>at which point, like I say, I'll be reaching out

266
00:17:01.840 --> 00:17:06.200
<v Speaker 3>to people to then schedule a brief interview by phone

267
00:17:06.319 --> 00:17:10.480
<v Speaker 3>or on the computer or what have you. And at

268
00:17:10.480 --> 00:17:13.799
<v Speaker 3>that point we'll be asking folks, will be identifying, you know,

269
00:17:13.839 --> 00:17:17.640
<v Speaker 3>which samples we want to get in some priority order,

270
00:17:18.079 --> 00:17:22.039
<v Speaker 3>and we'll be testing those. Anyone who submits a sample

271
00:17:22.720 --> 00:17:26.960
<v Speaker 3>in that form can choose whether they want to be

272
00:17:27.440 --> 00:17:32.559
<v Speaker 3>identified publicly identified with their sample or whether they want

273
00:17:32.599 --> 00:17:38.359
<v Speaker 3>to be completely anonymous, because some people want to be

274
00:17:38.480 --> 00:17:41.400
<v Speaker 3>identified and some people just want to know what something

275
00:17:41.559 --> 00:17:43.599
<v Speaker 3>is and they don't want anybody to know that they

276
00:17:43.640 --> 00:17:48.119
<v Speaker 3>had anything to do with sasquatch. Either one is fine.

277
00:17:49.279 --> 00:17:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Under no circumstances will we be disclosing specific locations where

278
00:17:56.160 --> 00:18:04.559
<v Speaker 3>samples were acquired. Will be giving general locations, but everybody

279
00:18:04.559 --> 00:18:10.400
<v Speaker 3>who submits a sample will receive the results for their sample,

280
00:18:10.839 --> 00:18:13.720
<v Speaker 3>and what sort of timeline would that be. Well, here's

281
00:18:13.759 --> 00:18:18.119
<v Speaker 3>the thing, Cliff, real science is not a speedy process.

282
00:18:19.000 --> 00:18:25.000
<v Speaker 3>So I'm trying not to promise a specific timeline to

283
00:18:25.160 --> 00:18:28.160
<v Speaker 3>folks other than we'll do it as well. We will

284
00:18:28.200 --> 00:18:31.880
<v Speaker 3>do these things as quickly as we can. But that

285
00:18:32.000 --> 00:18:37.400
<v Speaker 3>could depend on a large number of factors. So if

286
00:18:37.480 --> 00:18:41.559
<v Speaker 3>the sample, if the sample that's submitted is something that

287
00:18:41.559 --> 00:18:45.079
<v Speaker 3>we come in, we look at it, we run a

288
00:18:45.160 --> 00:18:47.839
<v Speaker 3>test and oh it pops up. Oh this is a

289
00:18:47.880 --> 00:18:52.000
<v Speaker 3>black bear, and it's very clearly black bear. And you know,

290
00:18:52.119 --> 00:18:55.559
<v Speaker 3>you may get a response in a matter of a

291
00:18:55.640 --> 00:19:00.359
<v Speaker 3>couple of months. If it's a sample that is more

292
00:19:00.400 --> 00:19:05.000
<v Speaker 3>degraded that we have were having trouble pulling sequencing information

293
00:19:05.279 --> 00:19:10.039
<v Speaker 3>out of, we may be working with it for a while.

294
00:19:10.519 --> 00:19:13.079
<v Speaker 3>It really just depends on so many things that are

295
00:19:13.119 --> 00:19:17.000
<v Speaker 3>beyond our control or the control of the people submitting

296
00:19:17.039 --> 00:19:20.680
<v Speaker 3>these things as to how long it could take. But

297
00:19:20.799 --> 00:19:26.319
<v Speaker 3>I do promise you you will receive response, You will

298
00:19:26.400 --> 00:19:30.559
<v Speaker 3>receive a report for your sample.

299
00:19:31.079 --> 00:19:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you would have to be extraordinarily careful, of course,

300
00:19:33.759 --> 00:19:38.400
<v Speaker 2>because if you say, for example, it happened a sasquatch

301
00:19:38.400 --> 00:19:42.160
<v Speaker 2>hair is submitted, it's in good shape, it passes the

302
00:19:42.160 --> 00:19:45.799
<v Speaker 2>microscopic analysis, and the DNA comes back, is what the

303
00:19:45.839 --> 00:19:48.920
<v Speaker 2>hell is this? Right? Even then it would have to

304
00:19:48.960 --> 00:19:53.400
<v Speaker 2>be tested and retested because a false positive in this

305
00:19:54.039 --> 00:19:58.200
<v Speaker 2>particular scenario could sink everything. It could just make the

306
00:19:58.279 --> 00:20:01.839
<v Speaker 2>subject and the study just a laughing stock. So you'd

307
00:20:01.839 --> 00:20:05.680
<v Speaker 2>have to be extraordinarily careful and just very very conservative

308
00:20:05.680 --> 00:20:09.359
<v Speaker 2>in how you assess the samples. Especially if it seems

309
00:20:09.400 --> 00:20:12.160
<v Speaker 2>that we're onto the right thing for the first time.

310
00:20:12.400 --> 00:20:17.279
<v Speaker 3>Well absolutely, and if that is, if that is a

311
00:20:17.960 --> 00:20:20.799
<v Speaker 3>finding of the study, that's one of the reasons that

312
00:20:21.640 --> 00:20:23.920
<v Speaker 3>one of the reasons that I have recruited the team

313
00:20:23.960 --> 00:20:29.279
<v Speaker 3>that I have, because these folks are absolutely tremendous and

314
00:20:29.359 --> 00:20:34.039
<v Speaker 3>this team is when you receive a report, you're going

315
00:20:34.079 --> 00:20:37.680
<v Speaker 3>to know that that's what it is. If what you said,

316
00:20:37.759 --> 00:20:40.519
<v Speaker 3>If if there is a sasquatch out there to be

317
00:20:40.680 --> 00:20:47.799
<v Speaker 3>found and there are samples submitted and we find that, well, uh,

318
00:20:48.319 --> 00:20:52.359
<v Speaker 3>this team is going to you know, very carefully document

319
00:20:52.440 --> 00:20:57.559
<v Speaker 3>that and present that again if that's if that's the finding.

320
00:20:59.160 --> 00:21:02.319
<v Speaker 3>You know, at this stage we haven't looked at any samples.

321
00:21:02.960 --> 00:21:06.279
<v Speaker 3>The salient point here is is that we don't know

322
00:21:06.359 --> 00:21:10.400
<v Speaker 3>what the samples that will be receiving are until we

323
00:21:10.440 --> 00:21:14.359
<v Speaker 3>look at them. And that's what makes this really exciting

324
00:21:14.680 --> 00:21:19.359
<v Speaker 3>is that there are a lot of rather interesting sounding

325
00:21:19.440 --> 00:21:24.880
<v Speaker 3>samples out there that have not been looked at by

326
00:21:24.960 --> 00:21:28.920
<v Speaker 3>a credible scientific team, and so I'm really excited to

327
00:21:28.960 --> 00:21:30.839
<v Speaker 3>see what our results are.

328
00:21:31.359 --> 00:21:33.599
<v Speaker 4>So, so there's four of you on the team. Who

329
00:21:33.599 --> 00:21:35.640
<v Speaker 4>are there are three people with their credentials.

330
00:21:36.079 --> 00:21:38.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so there are well, there are four of us

331
00:21:38.640 --> 00:21:45.279
<v Speaker 3>on the core team, myself and then two geneticist, genomicists,

332
00:21:46.000 --> 00:21:53.440
<v Speaker 3>and one microscopist so microscope expert, think of that. And

333
00:21:53.559 --> 00:21:58.119
<v Speaker 3>so this is the core team. And this team also

334
00:21:58.319 --> 00:22:02.720
<v Speaker 3>has a lot of expertise in forensics and wildlife forensics

335
00:22:02.880 --> 00:22:07.440
<v Speaker 3>as well. So this is the core team. But the

336
00:22:07.480 --> 00:22:11.400
<v Speaker 3>fun thing about this is is I also have a

337
00:22:11.440 --> 00:22:17.960
<v Speaker 3>whole host of experts in particular areas who are ready

338
00:22:18.000 --> 00:22:23.160
<v Speaker 3>to come on and join us if and when we

339
00:22:23.319 --> 00:22:30.480
<v Speaker 3>find an interesting specimen in their area of expertise. And

340
00:22:29.480 --> 00:22:33.680
<v Speaker 3>these are faculty researchers not just from NC State, but

341
00:22:33.720 --> 00:22:37.960
<v Speaker 3>from across the country. So, for example, I have someone

342
00:22:38.119 --> 00:22:42.920
<v Speaker 3>on board who is a physical anthropologist and an expert

343
00:22:43.480 --> 00:22:48.359
<v Speaker 3>in all things osteo. So if a bone or tooth

344
00:22:48.559 --> 00:22:54.039
<v Speaker 3>sample that is interesting is submitted for this study, she

345
00:22:54.279 --> 00:22:57.960
<v Speaker 3>is ready to jump on board and get involved and

346
00:22:58.119 --> 00:23:02.160
<v Speaker 3>really excited about it. But again, if we don't have

347
00:23:02.279 --> 00:23:06.519
<v Speaker 3>something in her area of expertise, well she's going to

348
00:23:06.599 --> 00:23:09.079
<v Speaker 3>stay in the bigfoot closet for now.

349
00:23:09.599 --> 00:23:12.720
<v Speaker 4>For that genome, for doing the full genome. YEA, you

350
00:23:12.720 --> 00:23:14.839
<v Speaker 4>always hear stuff like last time we talked to Meldery,

351
00:23:14.839 --> 00:23:17.640
<v Speaker 4>we said about four hundred and thirty four hundred and

352
00:23:17.640 --> 00:23:21.440
<v Speaker 4>forty thousand for a full genome sequencing? Is that like,

353
00:23:21.640 --> 00:23:23.359
<v Speaker 4>is us go asked about your budget, like how it

354
00:23:23.400 --> 00:23:25.680
<v Speaker 4>got approve that conmerce they give you, and then like,

355
00:23:25.720 --> 00:23:27.359
<v Speaker 4>when you hear those high numbers, is that going to

356
00:23:27.400 --> 00:23:29.640
<v Speaker 4>be cut way out? Since these guys are on faculty staff,

357
00:23:29.680 --> 00:23:33.079
<v Speaker 4>like they're already paid through the university, How does that work?

358
00:23:33.359 --> 00:23:36.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, But specifically Meldrum said in the six figure range,

359
00:23:36.920 --> 00:23:39.400
<v Speaker 2>and most of that would be for personnel.

360
00:23:39.400 --> 00:23:43.319
<v Speaker 3>Right, and so that is probably pretty reasonable to expect

361
00:23:43.359 --> 00:23:46.480
<v Speaker 3>if you were going to go out and hire and

362
00:23:46.640 --> 00:23:50.519
<v Speaker 3>hire the work done by someone who might know what

363
00:23:50.559 --> 00:23:55.319
<v Speaker 3>they're doing. Now, in this case, since we have the

364
00:23:56.759 --> 00:24:00.880
<v Speaker 3>we have the machines, on campus that are availed to us,

365
00:24:00.920 --> 00:24:07.319
<v Speaker 3>where we can do nuclear DNA sequencing for those samples

366
00:24:07.319 --> 00:24:12.599
<v Speaker 3>that may warrant it. Then you know, we have an

367
00:24:12.640 --> 00:24:16.279
<v Speaker 3>in house price schedule that looks quite a bit different

368
00:24:16.319 --> 00:24:20.799
<v Speaker 3>than that, to be honest, and because my colleagues are

369
00:24:20.839 --> 00:24:24.480
<v Speaker 3>the ones with the expertise. Not having to hire my

370
00:24:24.640 --> 00:24:29.440
<v Speaker 3>colleagues to work on our own study, that actually reduces

371
00:24:29.640 --> 00:24:32.400
<v Speaker 3>the cost dramatically.

372
00:24:32.880 --> 00:24:36.000
<v Speaker 4>How many you'd run, like further with your budget you

373
00:24:36.079 --> 00:24:38.000
<v Speaker 4>have for the year, like, how many samples do you run,

374
00:24:38.079 --> 00:24:40.039
<v Speaker 4>like twenty or fifty or.

375
00:24:40.279 --> 00:24:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, see, this is the thing. We don't have a

376
00:24:43.079 --> 00:24:47.759
<v Speaker 3>set budget for this project. And the reason we don't

377
00:24:48.000 --> 00:24:52.519
<v Speaker 3>is that there are quite a few different needs and

378
00:24:52.599 --> 00:24:56.119
<v Speaker 3>quite a few different goals that this project can potentially

379
00:24:56.160 --> 00:25:00.000
<v Speaker 3>help us to achieve. One of those that's really important

380
00:25:00.759 --> 00:25:05.960
<v Speaker 3>is training of PhD students in genetics. So our PhD

381
00:25:06.039 --> 00:25:10.440
<v Speaker 3>students in genetics who work in the labs of my

382
00:25:10.960 --> 00:25:14.759
<v Speaker 3>two colleagues who are collaborators, they need to teach these

383
00:25:14.799 --> 00:25:18.519
<v Speaker 3>students anyhow, and they see this as a really interesting

384
00:25:18.599 --> 00:25:23.240
<v Speaker 3>way of having the students work with true unknowns or

385
00:25:23.279 --> 00:25:29.119
<v Speaker 3>with unusual samples, and so this is a great way

386
00:25:29.240 --> 00:25:33.119
<v Speaker 3>for them to be able to train their PhD students,

387
00:25:33.480 --> 00:25:37.000
<v Speaker 3>like I say, which they need to do anyway, Right,

388
00:25:38.240 --> 00:25:43.319
<v Speaker 3>they need to be studying samples of something, So why

389
00:25:43.359 --> 00:25:48.640
<v Speaker 3>not the samples that are associated with this study. In addition,

390
00:25:50.400 --> 00:25:55.319
<v Speaker 3>the team we've talked about ideas that might help push

391
00:25:55.480 --> 00:26:01.480
<v Speaker 3>forensic understanding forward, So that might help develop new forensic

392
00:26:01.640 --> 00:26:06.920
<v Speaker 3>techniques that could be that could be useful again, not

393
00:26:07.079 --> 00:26:09.839
<v Speaker 3>just for this study or for this topic, but could

394
00:26:09.880 --> 00:26:14.480
<v Speaker 3>be very useful in the field for all kinds of things.

395
00:26:15.680 --> 00:26:18.039
<v Speaker 3>And so, and these are just a couple of examples.

396
00:26:18.440 --> 00:26:22.960
<v Speaker 3>There are some other things that some other outcomes that

397
00:26:23.039 --> 00:26:26.640
<v Speaker 3>we are imagining from the types of samples that we'll

398
00:26:26.640 --> 00:26:30.880
<v Speaker 3>be looking at. So a lot of the costs of

399
00:26:30.960 --> 00:26:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the study are costs that are already being born. Anyhow,

400
00:26:36.359 --> 00:26:37.960
<v Speaker 3>if you have to you know, if you have to

401
00:26:38.000 --> 00:26:42.160
<v Speaker 3>have a PhD student studying a sample of something, well

402
00:26:42.559 --> 00:26:44.519
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be the same cost whether studying a

403
00:26:44.559 --> 00:26:48.599
<v Speaker 3>sample from this study or a sample from some other study.

404
00:26:48.839 --> 00:26:52.279
<v Speaker 4>Right, How hard a sell is it to the university

405
00:26:52.279 --> 00:26:52.799
<v Speaker 4>to fund this?

406
00:26:53.440 --> 00:26:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well it's interesting. I mean again, it's not a

407
00:26:56.960 --> 00:27:00.559
<v Speaker 3>funding issue per se, because the funding is is the

408
00:27:00.599 --> 00:27:04.240
<v Speaker 3>funding that is already happening through the labs.

409
00:27:04.160 --> 00:27:06.240
<v Speaker 4>Like the institutional reputation that they're worried about.

410
00:27:06.240 --> 00:27:11.039
<v Speaker 3>That there is not really a concern with institutional reputation

411
00:27:11.680 --> 00:27:16.400
<v Speaker 3>because of the way that we are framing the study again,

412
00:27:16.880 --> 00:27:21.039
<v Speaker 3>because we're looking at this, We're looking at samples. We're

413
00:27:21.039 --> 00:27:25.559
<v Speaker 3>looking at specimens that are something right, and it's a

414
00:27:25.599 --> 00:27:28.920
<v Speaker 3>matter of figuring out what they are. We are not

415
00:27:29.480 --> 00:27:32.039
<v Speaker 3>going out there. This is not a study about looking

416
00:27:32.559 --> 00:27:38.200
<v Speaker 3>for Bigfoot. This is a study of looking at seemingly

417
00:27:38.519 --> 00:27:44.519
<v Speaker 3>unusual physical samples to determine what they are. Now we

418
00:27:44.640 --> 00:27:48.039
<v Speaker 3>know that a number of these samples are coming from

419
00:27:48.559 --> 00:27:53.720
<v Speaker 3>the Bigfoot community. They are the result of folks having

420
00:27:54.279 --> 00:27:59.480
<v Speaker 3>an experience they feel as a sasquatch and then finding

421
00:28:00.079 --> 00:28:07.359
<v Speaker 3>these specimens in connection with that. Well, there's still interesting specimens,

422
00:28:08.079 --> 00:28:13.240
<v Speaker 3>so we certainly don't want to be prejudiced against those specimens.

423
00:28:13.240 --> 00:28:16.680
<v Speaker 3>In fact, I think, if anything, the experiences that people

424
00:28:16.759 --> 00:28:20.160
<v Speaker 3>are having in conjunction with finding these types of samples

425
00:28:20.480 --> 00:28:23.839
<v Speaker 3>make them all the more interesting to me for us

426
00:28:23.880 --> 00:28:24.720
<v Speaker 3>to take a look at.

427
00:28:26.759 --> 00:28:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Stay tuned for more Bigfoot and beyond with Cliff and Bogo.

428
00:28:30.359 --> 00:28:38.799
<v Speaker 2>We'll be right back after these messages. So we talked

429
00:28:38.799 --> 00:28:41.279
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about the user's side, like someone like

430
00:28:41.359 --> 00:28:43.359
<v Speaker 2>me who might get a sample and want to submit it.

431
00:28:43.519 --> 00:28:46.000
<v Speaker 2>We talked a little bit about the budget and how

432
00:28:46.000 --> 00:28:50.400
<v Speaker 2>you got this past the gatekeepers at the university, and

433
00:28:50.559 --> 00:28:53.960
<v Speaker 2>basically how you sold the idea, which is brilliant. Of course,

434
00:28:54.640 --> 00:28:57.079
<v Speaker 2>then it was fantastic because working with unknowns that could

435
00:28:57.160 --> 00:29:03.920
<v Speaker 2>yield a real fantastic mind altering a discovery is just brilliant.

436
00:29:05.200 --> 00:29:07.680
<v Speaker 2>But what does it look like from your side, like

437
00:29:07.960 --> 00:29:11.400
<v Speaker 2>your team, When after I fill out, I fill out

438
00:29:11.440 --> 00:29:14.240
<v Speaker 2>the computer survey thing, my name, this and that, whatever,

439
00:29:14.759 --> 00:29:17.720
<v Speaker 2>I still have the sample, you get that email. What

440
00:29:17.839 --> 00:29:20.799
<v Speaker 2>happens in from that? And we'll just use an example

441
00:29:20.799 --> 00:29:22.640
<v Speaker 2>of a hair because obviously if you have a bone

442
00:29:22.920 --> 00:29:25.240
<v Speaker 2>or a flesh or blood tissue sample, it would be

443
00:29:25.400 --> 00:29:27.559
<v Speaker 2>probably a slightly different process. But we'll just deal with

444
00:29:27.640 --> 00:29:30.880
<v Speaker 2>hair for now because that's probably I'm guessing that'll probably

445
00:29:30.880 --> 00:29:32.599
<v Speaker 2>be what the majority of the samples you get or

446
00:29:32.599 --> 00:29:35.599
<v Speaker 2>be hair samples. So what would that look like from

447
00:29:35.640 --> 00:29:38.200
<v Speaker 2>your end, from when you receive that email to when

448
00:29:38.720 --> 00:29:40.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, when you put the sample down. I

449
00:29:40.200 --> 00:29:40.799
<v Speaker 2>guess I don't know.

450
00:29:41.039 --> 00:29:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, again, we have to prioritize the samples that we're

451
00:29:45.640 --> 00:29:46.200
<v Speaker 3>looking at.

452
00:29:46.559 --> 00:29:48.279
<v Speaker 2>How would you prioritize something like that?

453
00:29:48.759 --> 00:29:51.960
<v Speaker 3>We don't have a Folks ask me, you know, what's

454
00:29:52.000 --> 00:29:54.759
<v Speaker 3>your formula. We don't have a set formula for that.

455
00:29:55.799 --> 00:29:58.839
<v Speaker 3>But certainly what we're interested in is we're interested in

456
00:29:58.920 --> 00:30:01.920
<v Speaker 3>looking at First of all, we're interested in looking at

457
00:30:01.960 --> 00:30:08.559
<v Speaker 3>samples that appear to be the most interesting and that

458
00:30:09.599 --> 00:30:17.519
<v Speaker 3>appear to be the freshest, most likely to yield genetic information. So,

459
00:30:17.960 --> 00:30:21.400
<v Speaker 3>for example, if you were to offer us a hair

460
00:30:21.920 --> 00:30:26.079
<v Speaker 3>that you found twenty years ago and it's been in

461
00:30:26.119 --> 00:30:30.640
<v Speaker 3>your garage, that's going to be a much lower priority

462
00:30:30.799 --> 00:30:34.680
<v Speaker 3>than someone who's who says, hey, here's a hare that

463
00:30:34.759 --> 00:30:38.279
<v Speaker 3>I found last week, and by the way, I put

464
00:30:38.279 --> 00:30:40.200
<v Speaker 3>it under a microscope, and it's got a little bit

465
00:30:40.200 --> 00:30:42.759
<v Speaker 3>of flesh attached to it, and it doesn't look like

466
00:30:42.799 --> 00:30:43.599
<v Speaker 3>a known animal.

467
00:30:44.960 --> 00:30:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Sure, sure, but now the user, the users aren't going

468
00:30:48.039 --> 00:30:49.680
<v Speaker 2>to be able to determine that. That would have to

469
00:30:49.680 --> 00:30:52.799
<v Speaker 2>be I mean, on your end, someone like me or something. Yeah, sure,

470
00:30:52.799 --> 00:30:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I've got a microscope. I'm that level of nerd. But

471
00:30:55.880 --> 00:30:58.599
<v Speaker 2>the average Joe who may have seen a sasquatch and

472
00:30:58.640 --> 00:31:01.079
<v Speaker 2>wanted to submit a sample. They wouldn't know that. So

473
00:31:01.119 --> 00:31:04.359
<v Speaker 2>you just get a hair and a story essentially on

474
00:31:04.400 --> 00:31:04.960
<v Speaker 2>an email.

475
00:31:05.359 --> 00:31:10.079
<v Speaker 3>No, absolutely, and to give you an idea. So there's

476
00:31:10.599 --> 00:31:15.400
<v Speaker 3>a a sample that was offered to us that sounds

477
00:31:15.440 --> 00:31:23.240
<v Speaker 3>interesting because the person offering it reported seeing a sasquatch

478
00:31:23.960 --> 00:31:26.960
<v Speaker 3>one night. He said it was peeking out at him

479
00:31:27.000 --> 00:31:29.920
<v Speaker 3>from behind a pine tree. He went back the next

480
00:31:30.000 --> 00:31:33.920
<v Speaker 3>morning and in the sap of the pine tree found

481
00:31:34.240 --> 00:31:37.319
<v Speaker 3>a hair stuck there. And so he collected that. And

482
00:31:37.359 --> 00:31:40.839
<v Speaker 3>that was just several months ago. That, to me, is

483
00:31:40.960 --> 00:31:44.680
<v Speaker 3>much more interesting than this is not one that was offered,

484
00:31:44.759 --> 00:31:48.640
<v Speaker 3>but this was something that somebody talked with me about

485
00:31:48.880 --> 00:31:52.839
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years ago. Someone who says, hey, I

486
00:31:52.880 --> 00:31:55.559
<v Speaker 3>have a clump of hair that I think is sasquatch hair.

487
00:31:56.000 --> 00:31:59.720
<v Speaker 3>And I say, well, what makes you think it's sasquatch hair?

488
00:32:00.000 --> 00:32:03.079
<v Speaker 3>Why is it interesting to you? And they say, well,

489
00:32:03.519 --> 00:32:06.519
<v Speaker 3>I found it stuck fifteen feet up in a tree.

490
00:32:06.839 --> 00:32:09.559
<v Speaker 3>And what else would be fifteen feet up in a tree?

491
00:32:10.039 --> 00:32:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Could it be the hair of a sasquatch? Sure, of

492
00:32:13.279 --> 00:32:15.759
<v Speaker 3>course you don't know until you look at it. But

493
00:32:16.440 --> 00:32:19.039
<v Speaker 3>of course there are plenty of other things, you know,

494
00:32:19.079 --> 00:32:22.559
<v Speaker 3>There are things that climb trees, there is wind, there

495
00:32:22.599 --> 00:32:26.799
<v Speaker 3>are birds that use clumps of hairs nesting material, and

496
00:32:26.839 --> 00:32:30.759
<v Speaker 3>they can fall down. You know, there are lots of

497
00:32:30.799 --> 00:32:34.599
<v Speaker 3>ways that hair could get fifteen feet up in a tree.

498
00:32:34.960 --> 00:32:38.079
<v Speaker 3>So again we have to look at and it'll depend

499
00:32:38.119 --> 00:32:40.640
<v Speaker 3>on how many how many things are offered to us,

500
00:32:41.119 --> 00:32:42.880
<v Speaker 3>but we have to be able to put these in

501
00:32:42.960 --> 00:32:46.359
<v Speaker 3>some sort of priority order, because we're not looking to

502
00:32:46.480 --> 00:32:51.279
<v Speaker 3>just test any and every hair that someone finds in the.

503
00:32:51.240 --> 00:32:54.519
<v Speaker 2>Forest, of course not so say you have a good sample,

504
00:32:54.599 --> 00:32:57.119
<v Speaker 2>say that this person who saw the sasquatch and there's

505
00:32:57.119 --> 00:33:00.279
<v Speaker 2>a hair associated with it, or you know, you get

506
00:33:00.279 --> 00:33:03.200
<v Speaker 2>another sample that seems very promising to you. What is

507
00:33:03.279 --> 00:33:06.039
<v Speaker 2>the process at that point I'm assuming, I mean, I'm

508
00:33:06.039 --> 00:33:08.559
<v Speaker 2>just guessing here to you'd probably put under microscope first,

509
00:33:08.559 --> 00:33:11.200
<v Speaker 2>talk to your microscope dude or a gal, and then

510
00:33:12.119 --> 00:33:14.160
<v Speaker 2>and then move forward from there. Or what actually does

511
00:33:14.200 --> 00:33:15.319
<v Speaker 2>happen up to the point.

512
00:33:15.400 --> 00:33:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely well, the first thing is obviously, yes, we will

513
00:33:19.200 --> 00:33:22.839
<v Speaker 3>be looking at it microscopically. If we if we get

514
00:33:22.880 --> 00:33:26.079
<v Speaker 3>a specimen in and it looks you know, like for example,

515
00:33:26.160 --> 00:33:28.480
<v Speaker 3>this this hair that was found in the in the

516
00:33:28.519 --> 00:33:31.400
<v Speaker 3>sap of the pine tree. If we put it under

517
00:33:31.440 --> 00:33:35.200
<v Speaker 3>a microscope and it looks exactly like the hair of

518
00:33:35.240 --> 00:33:38.319
<v Speaker 3>a gray squirrel, which are common to that area and

519
00:33:39.000 --> 00:33:42.599
<v Speaker 3>climb up trees all the time. If it looks exactly

520
00:33:42.720 --> 00:33:46.799
<v Speaker 3>like that, it's a classic presentation. Well we've identified it

521
00:33:46.839 --> 00:33:49.960
<v Speaker 3>at that point. We don't need to move on to

522
00:33:50.079 --> 00:33:54.960
<v Speaker 3>genetic analysis to say it's a grey squirrel. But then

523
00:33:55.480 --> 00:33:57.640
<v Speaker 3>you know what we'll be doing is we'll be looking

524
00:33:57.680 --> 00:34:03.000
<v Speaker 3>at these things in step wise, a step wise way throughout,

525
00:34:03.079 --> 00:34:06.880
<v Speaker 3>so we'll be looking first. We'll be looking first at

526
00:34:06.920 --> 00:34:11.960
<v Speaker 3>the morphology, so again the appearance of these through the microscope,

527
00:34:12.360 --> 00:34:16.599
<v Speaker 3>seeing what is readily identified. If we find things that

528
00:34:16.639 --> 00:34:22.320
<v Speaker 3>aren't readily identified, or that look somewhat unusual or really unusual,

529
00:34:22.519 --> 00:34:25.280
<v Speaker 3>or whatever it may be, that's when we'll move on

530
00:34:25.440 --> 00:34:31.519
<v Speaker 3>to genetic analysis. And we're going to proceed with that

531
00:34:31.920 --> 00:34:34.840
<v Speaker 3>very cautiously because one of the things that we don't

532
00:34:34.920 --> 00:34:38.360
<v Speaker 3>want to do is we don't want to be destructive

533
00:34:40.280 --> 00:34:42.559
<v Speaker 3>any more than we need to be. We don't want

534
00:34:42.599 --> 00:34:46.519
<v Speaker 3>to be destructive of the samples that we receive. And

535
00:34:46.599 --> 00:34:50.280
<v Speaker 3>this is one thing that told me that I had

536
00:34:50.320 --> 00:34:54.800
<v Speaker 3>recruited the right team. Was at our very first team

537
00:34:54.840 --> 00:34:59.039
<v Speaker 3>meeting back when. It was one of my colleagues who

538
00:34:59.079 --> 00:35:02.360
<v Speaker 3>said we to treat every sample that comes to us

539
00:35:02.960 --> 00:35:08.159
<v Speaker 3>as precious, because these samples are going to be precious

540
00:35:08.480 --> 00:35:11.639
<v Speaker 3>to the people who are submitting them. And I was like, wow,

541
00:35:11.800 --> 00:35:16.400
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't have said that better myself. And so we're

542
00:35:16.440 --> 00:35:19.800
<v Speaker 3>going to be proceeding very cautiously in the least destructive

543
00:35:19.840 --> 00:35:25.000
<v Speaker 3>ways possible, and we're going to be we will go

544
00:35:25.039 --> 00:35:28.119
<v Speaker 3>as far with the analysis as we need to go

545
00:35:28.599 --> 00:35:34.119
<v Speaker 3>in order to determine what the sample is. So with

546
00:35:34.239 --> 00:35:38.199
<v Speaker 3>a hair sample, will you know, certainly looking at it microscopically,

547
00:35:38.280 --> 00:35:44.079
<v Speaker 3>first looking at the mitochondrial DNA, and then again, if warranted,

548
00:35:44.159 --> 00:35:47.000
<v Speaker 3>taking that to the step of looking at the nuclear DNA,

549
00:35:47.119 --> 00:35:48.239
<v Speaker 3>looking at the full genome.

550
00:35:48.800 --> 00:35:51.119
<v Speaker 2>So with hair samples, and again, correct me if I'm wrong.

551
00:35:51.199 --> 00:35:53.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't know very much in general, But there's no

552
00:35:53.840 --> 00:35:57.440
<v Speaker 2>there's no nuclear DNA, there's just mitochondrial DNA. Do you

553
00:35:57.519 --> 00:36:00.880
<v Speaker 2>think that, unless, of course you have the follicle? I remember, correctly.

554
00:36:01.719 --> 00:36:03.960
<v Speaker 2>But let's just say that you have a partial hair sample,

555
00:36:04.000 --> 00:36:09.119
<v Speaker 2>and it could the mitochondrial be enough to indicate the

556
00:36:09.159 --> 00:36:11.519
<v Speaker 2>presence of a new species potentially?

557
00:36:11.639 --> 00:36:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, absolutely, I you know, I do think that we

558
00:36:16.960 --> 00:36:22.440
<v Speaker 3>would we would want to try to have multiple samples

559
00:36:23.960 --> 00:36:27.039
<v Speaker 3>certainly where we would find that. I do think that

560
00:36:27.119 --> 00:36:30.880
<v Speaker 3>having like one sample with mitochondrial DNA was different would

561
00:36:31.079 --> 00:36:35.440
<v Speaker 3>be really really interesting, but probably not enough, you know,

562
00:36:35.519 --> 00:36:39.360
<v Speaker 3>certainly to establish a species. You know, the interesting thing

563
00:36:39.639 --> 00:36:44.239
<v Speaker 3>is is that you know, when people submit a hair sample,

564
00:36:44.400 --> 00:36:47.960
<v Speaker 3>oftentimes yes, we don't know will that sample have the

565
00:36:48.000 --> 00:36:52.480
<v Speaker 3>follicle in it? Will that sample actually have a skin

566
00:36:52.559 --> 00:36:56.920
<v Speaker 3>cell still attached where where where it came out of

567
00:36:56.920 --> 00:37:01.920
<v Speaker 3>the body, And certainly the skin cell would contain a

568
00:37:01.920 --> 00:37:07.920
<v Speaker 3>complete genetic sequence, So again you're you're absolutely right. Hair

569
00:37:08.159 --> 00:37:10.960
<v Speaker 3>is generally not going to give us a full genome,

570
00:37:11.480 --> 00:37:15.519
<v Speaker 3>but a sample that one thinks of as hair could

571
00:37:15.840 --> 00:37:16.800
<v Speaker 3>potentially do so.

572
00:37:17.320 --> 00:37:19.239
<v Speaker 2>And I guess it doesn't come down to one sample

573
00:37:19.280 --> 00:37:20.840
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the day, because this is science

574
00:37:20.880 --> 00:37:26.039
<v Speaker 2>and you want repeatability, and certainly sasquatches are real animals,

575
00:37:26.239 --> 00:37:28.920
<v Speaker 2>and people start sending you a flood of hairs, a

576
00:37:29.039 --> 00:37:32.159
<v Speaker 2>very small percentage of those hairs will probably represent sasquatch.

577
00:37:32.239 --> 00:37:36.679
<v Speaker 2>And I'm assuming by comparing the results of these anomalous samples,

578
00:37:37.360 --> 00:37:41.079
<v Speaker 2>that's where the real, the real positive affirmation is really

579
00:37:41.119 --> 00:37:46.559
<v Speaker 2>going to lie is the repeatability of the same novel sequences.

580
00:37:47.000 --> 00:37:47.599
<v Speaker 2>Is that correct?

581
00:37:48.400 --> 00:37:53.239
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely? If we just get one novel sequence again, that's

582
00:37:53.280 --> 00:37:56.920
<v Speaker 3>a really fascinating result. That would be that alone would

583
00:37:56.920 --> 00:38:00.559
<v Speaker 3>be enough to keep us looking and looking and looking. Perhaps,

584
00:38:01.519 --> 00:38:07.719
<v Speaker 3>but yes, it's it's the idea of having multiple of that,

585
00:38:08.000 --> 00:38:13.880
<v Speaker 3>and so in an ideal world, at a minimum, I think,

586
00:38:14.000 --> 00:38:17.159
<v Speaker 3>if you're if you're if if the idea is, if

587
00:38:17.239 --> 00:38:20.639
<v Speaker 3>you're asking me, what would it take to establish a species,

588
00:38:21.119 --> 00:38:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that actually as few as say, three samples

589
00:38:27.320 --> 00:38:33.199
<v Speaker 3>coming from three different locations but that share the same

590
00:38:33.760 --> 00:38:38.000
<v Speaker 3>novel sequence, I would think that that that in and

591
00:38:38.039 --> 00:38:42.280
<v Speaker 3>of itself, something as simple as that simple ha, right,

592
00:38:43.599 --> 00:38:47.840
<v Speaker 3>something as you know, as as little as three samples

593
00:38:47.960 --> 00:38:51.360
<v Speaker 3>could could be enough to essentially prove species.

594
00:38:51.760 --> 00:38:55.119
<v Speaker 2>Fantastic. Now, one of the things that we spoke about

595
00:38:55.159 --> 00:38:58.760
<v Speaker 2>when we were speaking in person last in Tennessee, where

596
00:38:58.760 --> 00:39:01.360
<v Speaker 2>I met you face to face. Something I believe that

597
00:39:01.440 --> 00:39:05.599
<v Speaker 2>sets this the study apart from the many many other

598
00:39:05.639 --> 00:39:08.079
<v Speaker 2>studies that have kind of come up empty after all

599
00:39:08.079 --> 00:39:12.880
<v Speaker 2>this time, is that this study isn't dependent upon you.

600
00:39:13.400 --> 00:39:15.079
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's an important thing we probably want

601
00:39:15.119 --> 00:39:17.440
<v Speaker 2>to put out there, because I imagine a lot of

602
00:39:17.480 --> 00:39:22.440
<v Speaker 2>our perhaps slightly more conspiratorial minded listeners out there are thinking, well,

603
00:39:22.480 --> 00:39:24.119
<v Speaker 2>this is just going to have more positive results, and

604
00:39:24.159 --> 00:39:25.920
<v Speaker 2>the results are going to go missing. You know, the

605
00:39:25.960 --> 00:39:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Smithsonian is going to take them, the roth Childs are

606
00:39:28.320 --> 00:39:30.960
<v Speaker 2>going to send their spy team in and take them,

607
00:39:31.039 --> 00:39:34.000
<v Speaker 2>or whatever sort of you know fantasies are out there.

608
00:39:34.000 --> 00:39:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I don't know. I'm not a conspiracy guy.

609
00:39:35.840 --> 00:39:37.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't buy any a lot of that stuff. But

610
00:39:38.519 --> 00:39:41.840
<v Speaker 2>what would stop the samples after they're submitted, especially the

611
00:39:41.880 --> 00:39:44.840
<v Speaker 2>positive hits, if such a thing does exist, what would

612
00:39:44.880 --> 00:39:49.760
<v Speaker 2>stop them from being lost or mishandled, or going into

613
00:39:49.880 --> 00:39:53.480
<v Speaker 2>the Smithsonian where all the illuminati of the world will

614
00:39:53.519 --> 00:39:55.679
<v Speaker 2>burn them in some sort of ritual.

615
00:39:58.159 --> 00:40:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Well short off an absol catastrophe, and you know, we

616
00:40:01.880 --> 00:40:04.079
<v Speaker 3>don't need to talk about a nuclear event or.

617
00:40:04.000 --> 00:40:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Something like that.

618
00:40:05.360 --> 00:40:09.519
<v Speaker 3>But no, I mean, this is this is why I

619
00:40:09.559 --> 00:40:12.239
<v Speaker 3>was determined to set this up as a as a

620
00:40:12.440 --> 00:40:16.760
<v Speaker 3>as a real study. This is not me, as a

621
00:40:16.800 --> 00:40:20.480
<v Speaker 3>faculty member at NC State saying, hey, send me these samples,

622
00:40:20.559 --> 00:40:24.119
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to take a look at them. I spent

623
00:40:24.320 --> 00:40:28.480
<v Speaker 3>years putting together the right team going through the paperwork

624
00:40:28.519 --> 00:40:30.480
<v Speaker 3>with the university, so they said, I had to go

625
00:40:30.519 --> 00:40:34.280
<v Speaker 3>through this ethic ethics review. Part of that ethics review

626
00:40:34.639 --> 00:40:38.679
<v Speaker 3>is having a plan so that when somebody submits a

627
00:40:38.719 --> 00:40:41.800
<v Speaker 3>sample and we say we're going to give you your results,

628
00:40:42.199 --> 00:40:45.039
<v Speaker 3>there is a plan in place that that person will

629
00:40:45.079 --> 00:40:51.920
<v Speaker 3>receive those results even if something goes wrong, even if

630
00:40:52.599 --> 00:40:55.880
<v Speaker 3>something happens to me, if I die, you will still

631
00:40:55.920 --> 00:40:59.679
<v Speaker 3>get your results. And that's something that's very important. You

632
00:41:00.239 --> 00:41:03.920
<v Speaker 3>say about all these studies that have happened in the past,

633
00:41:04.440 --> 00:41:08.360
<v Speaker 3>but there aren't actually all these studies that have happened

634
00:41:08.400 --> 00:41:11.079
<v Speaker 3>in the past, Cliff, in terms of looking at them

635
00:41:11.119 --> 00:41:16.480
<v Speaker 3>as actual studies. There was the Brian Syke study, which

636
00:41:16.559 --> 00:41:25.039
<v Speaker 3>is the only other university study of any alleged sasquatch

637
00:41:25.159 --> 00:41:29.519
<v Speaker 3>DNA ever, and that was a very limited study. They

638
00:41:29.559 --> 00:41:34.559
<v Speaker 3>looked at a very small number of samples. Other than that,

639
00:41:36.480 --> 00:41:41.079
<v Speaker 3>folks looking at these things in university settings have been

640
00:41:41.400 --> 00:41:47.920
<v Speaker 3>individual researchers who have been doing this on the side

641
00:41:48.039 --> 00:41:52.320
<v Speaker 3>out of personal interest, as a favor to someone. In

642
00:41:52.360 --> 00:41:57.880
<v Speaker 3>a few cases, universities I know some universities offer a

643
00:41:57.960 --> 00:42:00.920
<v Speaker 3>similar service to a commercial lab to where they'll look

644
00:42:00.920 --> 00:42:03.760
<v Speaker 3>at a sample for the general at the general public

645
00:42:03.840 --> 00:42:09.000
<v Speaker 3>pays to have those samples examined, but there hasn't been

646
00:42:10.119 --> 00:42:15.039
<v Speaker 3>a large scale university study period that's been inclusive of

647
00:42:15.079 --> 00:42:20.559
<v Speaker 3>this potential evidence. And that makes a huge difference. Because

648
00:42:20.719 --> 00:42:24.840
<v Speaker 3>I was talking with a bigfoot investigator a couple of

649
00:42:24.880 --> 00:42:29.840
<v Speaker 3>months ago who had collected some very interesting samples. A

650
00:42:29.840 --> 00:42:33.719
<v Speaker 3>few years ago, a faculty at a university I shall

651
00:42:33.760 --> 00:42:37.039
<v Speaker 3>not name said hey, I'd like to take a look

652
00:42:37.079 --> 00:42:40.519
<v Speaker 3>at those in my lab, and he sent them off

653
00:42:40.559 --> 00:42:44.880
<v Speaker 3>to this faculty member who was very well intentioned and

654
00:42:45.480 --> 00:42:48.599
<v Speaker 3>just never got back to him, never got back to him,

655
00:42:48.840 --> 00:42:53.519
<v Speaker 3>never got back to him, And so I asked him,

656
00:42:53.519 --> 00:42:56.159
<v Speaker 3>I said, well, who was this? Let me try to

657
00:42:56.199 --> 00:43:01.000
<v Speaker 3>reach out faculty of faculty and I found out that

658
00:43:01.039 --> 00:43:05.280
<v Speaker 3>this faculty member was deceased, and I'm trying to I'm

659
00:43:05.360 --> 00:43:08.079
<v Speaker 3>trying to get to the right person in his former

660
00:43:08.159 --> 00:43:10.960
<v Speaker 3>lab to find out whether these samples are still around.

661
00:43:11.400 --> 00:43:15.400
<v Speaker 3>But I'm almost certain we're going to find that when

662
00:43:15.440 --> 00:43:18.119
<v Speaker 3>he passed away, they weren't part of an official study,

663
00:43:18.440 --> 00:43:22.719
<v Speaker 3>so they just got discarded, is what I'm sure would

664
00:43:22.760 --> 00:43:27.320
<v Speaker 3>have happened. When something is not part of an official study,

665
00:43:27.920 --> 00:43:32.119
<v Speaker 3>you're really reliant on you, really relying on the individual.

666
00:43:32.400 --> 00:43:36.000
<v Speaker 3>And again I think a lot of very well intentioned

667
00:43:36.000 --> 00:43:43.239
<v Speaker 3>faculty have taken samples from folks and not given back

668
00:43:43.360 --> 00:43:47.039
<v Speaker 3>the type of the type of report, the type of information,

669
00:43:48.719 --> 00:43:52.800
<v Speaker 3>or any information in some cases, again despite the best

670
00:43:52.840 --> 00:43:53.679
<v Speaker 3>of intentions.

671
00:43:56.000 --> 00:43:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Stay tuned for more Bigfoot and Beyond with Cliff and Bobo.

672
00:43:59.599 --> 00:44:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Will be back after these messages.

673
00:44:07.639 --> 00:44:12.920
<v Speaker 3>So Cliff, you may recall several years ago we had

674
00:44:12.960 --> 00:44:18.599
<v Speaker 3>some conversations online and you had guested in my university class,

675
00:44:18.840 --> 00:44:21.079
<v Speaker 3>and thank you again for that. That was a wonderful

676
00:44:21.119 --> 00:44:22.119
<v Speaker 3>time for the students.

677
00:44:22.480 --> 00:44:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I am still an educator at heart.

678
00:44:24.400 --> 00:44:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Well it shows and it's great. But at that time

679
00:44:28.960 --> 00:44:33.000
<v Speaker 3>you and I had discussed one on one. You had

680
00:44:33.000 --> 00:44:36.840
<v Speaker 3>come into possession of a very interesting sample, and I

681
00:44:36.920 --> 00:44:39.719
<v Speaker 3>know you were saying to me, Hey, I'd love to

682
00:44:39.760 --> 00:44:42.199
<v Speaker 3>send this to you. I'd love for your folks to

683
00:44:42.239 --> 00:44:45.800
<v Speaker 3>look at this. And I know at the time I

684
00:44:45.840 --> 00:44:48.079
<v Speaker 3>said to you, I said, hold on, hold on, I

685
00:44:48.119 --> 00:44:50.800
<v Speaker 3>don't want to take it yet. I did not want

686
00:44:50.840 --> 00:44:55.360
<v Speaker 3>to be that person who takes samples again with really

687
00:44:55.360 --> 00:45:01.480
<v Speaker 3>great intentions, but outside of an official study, because I

688
00:45:01.880 --> 00:45:04.679
<v Speaker 3>feel like I owe it to folks that if they're

689
00:45:04.679 --> 00:45:08.280
<v Speaker 3>going to submit, they need to know that they're going

690
00:45:08.360 --> 00:45:11.599
<v Speaker 3>to get back good results, they're going to get them

691
00:45:11.679 --> 00:45:18.159
<v Speaker 3>back regardless again, regardless of me, and that they're going

692
00:45:18.199 --> 00:45:20.760
<v Speaker 3>to be treated with respect.

693
00:45:21.159 --> 00:45:23.199
<v Speaker 2>And was that the mattress prints? Is that what you're

694
00:45:23.280 --> 00:45:23.760
<v Speaker 2>referring to?

695
00:45:24.320 --> 00:45:29.079
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, yeah, and I know we're talking about ways that

696
00:45:29.320 --> 00:45:32.079
<v Speaker 3>you might be able to submit part of that now.

697
00:45:33.599 --> 00:45:35.519
<v Speaker 3>I would be talking that over with my team at

698
00:45:35.519 --> 00:45:39.440
<v Speaker 3>our next meeting to see how we might work with

699
00:45:39.519 --> 00:45:40.280
<v Speaker 3>a sample like that.

700
00:45:41.039 --> 00:45:42.960
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking, Macy can, like the other night has

701
00:45:43.079 --> 00:45:45.079
<v Speaker 2>fallen asleep and these are the sort of things that

702
00:45:45.199 --> 00:45:46.559
<v Speaker 2>put me to sleep. I guess at the end of

703
00:45:46.599 --> 00:45:48.280
<v Speaker 2>the night, I guess, although it gets me too excited

704
00:45:48.320 --> 00:45:50.320
<v Speaker 2>and worried about stuff, so I can't actually sleep. It's

705
00:45:50.360 --> 00:45:53.960
<v Speaker 2>a horrible circular thing I live in. But I was thinking,

706
00:45:54.039 --> 00:45:56.599
<v Speaker 2>maybe send you like a cute like a square centimeter

707
00:45:56.800 --> 00:45:58.360
<v Speaker 2>or something like that of a place where I know

708
00:45:58.440 --> 00:46:00.280
<v Speaker 2>that it's stepped and I don't know, there's lots ways

709
00:46:00.280 --> 00:46:03.039
<v Speaker 2>we can do that. And also I did have the

710
00:46:03.119 --> 00:46:08.199
<v Speaker 2>foresight of collecting the soil off of the fabric itself,

711
00:46:08.280 --> 00:46:10.719
<v Speaker 2>and I still have that in my files. It has

712
00:46:10.760 --> 00:46:13.639
<v Speaker 2>been refrigerated. Unfortunately I didn't was unaware of that component.

713
00:46:13.639 --> 00:46:15.760
<v Speaker 2>But it's in my files in a paper bag, so

714
00:46:15.920 --> 00:46:18.039
<v Speaker 2>there's also that. I'll talk about that later off the air.

715
00:46:18.079 --> 00:46:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Of course. Back to the question I was going to ask,

716
00:46:20.800 --> 00:46:23.079
<v Speaker 2>is that you mentioned various others I said studies, but

717
00:46:23.119 --> 00:46:26.719
<v Speaker 2>perhaps that's not the right word, projects that have been

718
00:46:26.760 --> 00:46:30.000
<v Speaker 2>done over time. And I didn't you mention to me

719
00:46:30.079 --> 00:46:32.679
<v Speaker 2>when we were in Tennessee a few weeks ago about

720
00:46:32.960 --> 00:46:36.199
<v Speaker 2>using or looking at least at other people's data to

721
00:46:36.760 --> 00:46:39.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of like in the same way that doctor Haskell

722
00:46:39.079 --> 00:46:42.159
<v Speaker 2>Hart did with the Sasquatch genome project. He just used

723
00:46:42.159 --> 00:46:44.920
<v Speaker 2>their data and came up with different results. Are you

724
00:46:44.960 --> 00:46:48.880
<v Speaker 2>looking for other former projects, I guess, and trying to

725
00:46:48.880 --> 00:46:51.400
<v Speaker 2>get a hold of their data as well, And if so,

726
00:46:51.760 --> 00:46:52.519
<v Speaker 2>for what purpose?

727
00:46:52.920 --> 00:46:57.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, I have been trying to do that, and

728
00:46:58.039 --> 00:47:01.239
<v Speaker 3>that has been I've been trying to do that over

729
00:47:01.280 --> 00:47:04.840
<v Speaker 3>the last several years. And that's been a rather frustra

730
00:47:05.280 --> 00:47:11.199
<v Speaker 3>frustrating process, Cliff. And it's been rather frustrating because what

731
00:47:11.360 --> 00:47:15.719
<v Speaker 3>I find is that there really haven't been that many

732
00:47:15.760 --> 00:47:23.000
<v Speaker 3>analyzes done period. There really isn't data to look at

733
00:47:23.480 --> 00:47:28.880
<v Speaker 3>hardly at all. In fact, when Haskell heart did his

734
00:47:29.599 --> 00:47:34.039
<v Speaker 3>interpretation of the Ketchum at all study data that you're

735
00:47:34.079 --> 00:47:40.760
<v Speaker 3>referring to. Ironically, that is the only real data sequencing

736
00:47:40.880 --> 00:47:45.800
<v Speaker 3>data that has been made available by anybody who's looked

737
00:47:45.840 --> 00:47:50.880
<v Speaker 3>at alleged sasquatch samples. So one thing that the Ketcham

738
00:47:50.880 --> 00:47:54.360
<v Speaker 3>team did right was it eventually, at least after they

739
00:47:54.480 --> 00:47:58.239
<v Speaker 3>self publish their paper, they did release that data so

740
00:47:58.320 --> 00:48:02.360
<v Speaker 3>that Haskell and myself and others can take a look

741
00:48:02.400 --> 00:48:06.480
<v Speaker 3>at that. Now, in the case of that study, with

742
00:48:06.559 --> 00:48:10.440
<v Speaker 3>the data in hand, it's easy to see that the

743
00:48:10.480 --> 00:48:14.639
<v Speaker 3>interpretation that was given by that team is wrong. Now

744
00:48:15.559 --> 00:48:20.119
<v Speaker 3>Haskell has looked at that and noted a few interesting,

745
00:48:20.280 --> 00:48:24.199
<v Speaker 3>potentially interesting things in the data, but these are really

746
00:48:24.360 --> 00:48:26.760
<v Speaker 3>just questions at this point.

747
00:48:27.159 --> 00:48:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think that's interesting because at the end

748
00:48:29.000 --> 00:48:32.360
<v Speaker 2>of the day, Haskell is not a geneticist. He's a chemist.

749
00:48:32.480 --> 00:48:35.639
<v Speaker 2>He's a retired chemist, and just realized that, well, biology

750
00:48:35.679 --> 00:48:38.679
<v Speaker 2>and DNA we're just big old bags of chemistry walking

751
00:48:38.679 --> 00:48:40.880
<v Speaker 2>around talking to each other. At the end of the day.

752
00:48:41.079 --> 00:48:45.079
<v Speaker 2>That's what life is, just chemistry essentially, And I think

753
00:48:45.079 --> 00:48:46.920
<v Speaker 2>he kind of taught himself what he needed to know

754
00:48:47.039 --> 00:48:50.480
<v Speaker 2>to kind of do the examination of the data. So

755
00:48:51.159 --> 00:48:54.199
<v Speaker 2>it's neat that someone outside the discipline, I think, paid

756
00:48:54.239 --> 00:48:57.199
<v Speaker 2>attention to it and is perhaps drawing attention to these things.

757
00:48:57.400 --> 00:49:00.199
<v Speaker 2>And it's maybe because he is outside of the discipline,

758
00:49:00.320 --> 00:49:02.519
<v Speaker 2>it's a perfectly normal thing that he just doesn't have

759
00:49:02.639 --> 00:49:05.519
<v Speaker 2>that knowledge to explain. Or maybe it's just a new

760
00:49:05.559 --> 00:49:07.719
<v Speaker 2>set of eyes looking at something from a different direction

761
00:49:08.079 --> 00:49:10.840
<v Speaker 2>that you wouldn't get from the inside of that discipline.

762
00:49:11.079 --> 00:49:14.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So what Haskell has done there is he's raised

763
00:49:14.239 --> 00:49:17.840
<v Speaker 3>a really interesting question, but it's a question that simply

764
00:49:17.880 --> 00:49:21.000
<v Speaker 3>cannot be answered with the data that we currently have.

765
00:49:21.679 --> 00:49:23.679
<v Speaker 2>The data might be available for a couple of these

766
00:49:23.679 --> 00:49:26.800
<v Speaker 2>previous studies, right, so does the data do you any

767
00:49:26.840 --> 00:49:31.119
<v Speaker 2>good or do you actually need the physical samples to

768
00:49:31.400 --> 00:49:32.760
<v Speaker 2>make any progress on this?

769
00:49:33.400 --> 00:49:38.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, the data, in one sense, the data could do

770
00:49:38.400 --> 00:49:43.480
<v Speaker 3>some good, and I think that One of the things, though,

771
00:49:43.599 --> 00:49:47.280
<v Speaker 3>is that I've found that the data just simply isn't there.

772
00:49:48.880 --> 00:49:51.920
<v Speaker 3>There are On the one hand, I've found that there

773
00:49:51.960 --> 00:49:57.000
<v Speaker 3>are far more rumors of genetic analyzes having been done,

774
00:49:58.199 --> 00:50:03.480
<v Speaker 3>in fact, overwhelming more rumors of genetic analyses being done

775
00:50:04.079 --> 00:50:10.760
<v Speaker 3>than actual analyses that have been completed. And it's really

776
00:50:10.800 --> 00:50:14.159
<v Speaker 3>interesting to me because, as I said, I've spent years

777
00:50:14.320 --> 00:50:18.679
<v Speaker 3>trying to track down every example that I can of

778
00:50:19.039 --> 00:50:26.000
<v Speaker 3>an analysis that was done a genetic analysis. And so

779
00:50:26.199 --> 00:50:30.159
<v Speaker 3>when someone says, oh, you know, my friend had a

780
00:50:30.280 --> 00:50:33.119
<v Speaker 3>sample tested and it came back from the lab as

781
00:50:33.159 --> 00:50:36.360
<v Speaker 3>such and such, I've said, okay, well who's your friend?

782
00:50:37.360 --> 00:50:40.920
<v Speaker 3>May I contact them? And again and again what I

783
00:50:41.000 --> 00:50:44.440
<v Speaker 3>find is I contact the friend and they say, oh, no,

784
00:50:44.559 --> 00:50:48.199
<v Speaker 3>that wasn't me, that was my other friend. Like oh, okay,

785
00:50:48.239 --> 00:50:51.880
<v Speaker 3>well what's your other friend's name? And then I go

786
00:50:51.960 --> 00:50:55.159
<v Speaker 3>and I talk with that person and they say, no, no, no,

787
00:50:55.320 --> 00:50:58.400
<v Speaker 3>I didn't say that I had a genetic analysis done.

788
00:50:58.440 --> 00:51:02.239
<v Speaker 3>I said, the sample that I found looked like the

789
00:51:02.360 --> 00:51:05.920
<v Speaker 3>sample that was featured on one of the Snelgrove Lake

790
00:51:06.159 --> 00:51:09.320
<v Speaker 3>episodes of Monster Quest where they got such and such

791
00:51:09.320 --> 00:51:14.159
<v Speaker 3>a result. And I kid you not half a dozen

792
00:51:14.840 --> 00:51:22.480
<v Speaker 3>of the specific DNA analyses that had been shared with

793
00:51:22.599 --> 00:51:29.320
<v Speaker 3>me verbally, I traced back to that one same episode

794
00:51:29.360 --> 00:51:33.679
<v Speaker 3>of Monster Quest where someone was talking about that and

795
00:51:33.760 --> 00:51:37.679
<v Speaker 3>it had become misinterpreted in a game of telephone. Again,

796
00:51:37.760 --> 00:51:41.800
<v Speaker 3>I think everybody trying to be sincere, but everybody believing

797
00:51:41.840 --> 00:51:45.480
<v Speaker 3>that it was their friend who had this sample tested.

798
00:51:46.840 --> 00:51:52.599
<v Speaker 3>I have found actually very few instances where there was

799
00:51:52.679 --> 00:51:57.079
<v Speaker 3>a sample actually tested or somebody claims that they actually

800
00:51:57.159 --> 00:52:02.360
<v Speaker 3>had it tested, and far far fewer than that where

801
00:52:02.360 --> 00:52:07.079
<v Speaker 3>somebody can actually show me a report. And so there

802
00:52:07.119 --> 00:52:11.639
<v Speaker 3>really don't seem to be that many practically none that

803
00:52:11.760 --> 00:52:15.559
<v Speaker 3>have been done. So that's really interesting there. Really we're

804
00:52:15.719 --> 00:52:20.679
<v Speaker 3>operating in a space where there isn't really any data

805
00:52:21.119 --> 00:52:24.679
<v Speaker 3>at all, and so that's why we need to.

806
00:52:24.480 --> 00:52:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Produce some Absolutely, and will the data from this study

807
00:52:28.039 --> 00:52:31.760
<v Speaker 2>be shared publicly or will how will it be packaged

808
00:52:31.800 --> 00:52:36.320
<v Speaker 2>up and shared with other scientists even for that matter, Yeah, definitely,

809
00:52:36.360 --> 00:52:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the data from this study will be shared. I'm not

810
00:52:40.000 --> 00:52:43.639
<v Speaker 2>promising a particular timeline for that that It depends on

811
00:52:43.679 --> 00:52:47.599
<v Speaker 2>a number of factors and certainly depends on what we

812
00:52:47.760 --> 00:52:50.760
<v Speaker 2>find as to how we go about sharing that.

813
00:52:51.280 --> 00:52:53.159
<v Speaker 3>It will be public, yes, indeed.

814
00:52:53.559 --> 00:52:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Now, will the negative hits also be made public? Like

815
00:52:56.800 --> 00:52:58.800
<v Speaker 2>when you get a black bear sample, the black bear sample,

816
00:52:58.800 --> 00:53:01.480
<v Speaker 2>and that'll be put out as black bear. Yes, yes,

817
00:53:01.880 --> 00:53:04.280
<v Speaker 2>to the public as well as the sample owner.

818
00:53:04.800 --> 00:53:08.079
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's the idea. Yeah, we're planning, and you know,

819
00:53:08.159 --> 00:53:13.159
<v Speaker 3>we're certainly planning publication out of this. You know, what

820
00:53:13.199 --> 00:53:16.519
<v Speaker 3>we are obviously, what we publish and where we publish

821
00:53:16.559 --> 00:53:18.639
<v Speaker 3>and when we publish. All these things are going to

822
00:53:18.679 --> 00:53:21.320
<v Speaker 3>depend on, you know, what are the results that we

823
00:53:21.360 --> 00:53:27.320
<v Speaker 3>are getting. There are quite a few rather interesting results

824
00:53:27.360 --> 00:53:29.480
<v Speaker 3>that we could have. There are lots of things that

825
00:53:29.519 --> 00:53:33.840
<v Speaker 3>can help push science forward. I know that your listenership

826
00:53:34.199 --> 00:53:37.559
<v Speaker 3>is particularly interested in what if we were to find

827
00:53:38.239 --> 00:53:43.599
<v Speaker 3>an unknown species? And in that case, I think that's

828
00:53:43.639 --> 00:53:48.760
<v Speaker 3>where it's particularly interesting because in that case we probably

829
00:53:48.880 --> 00:53:54.239
<v Speaker 3>would hold back at least for a while on sharing publicly.

830
00:53:54.360 --> 00:53:57.519
<v Speaker 3>We would certainly have it peer reviewed, but from sharing

831
00:53:57.599 --> 00:54:03.440
<v Speaker 3>publicly the the sequencing the sequence data of a of

832
00:54:03.480 --> 00:54:09.480
<v Speaker 3>a novel species, simply because it wouldn't necessarily be ethical too,

833
00:54:10.039 --> 00:54:15.559
<v Speaker 3>uh to put that information out there publicly until we

834
00:54:15.719 --> 00:54:20.719
<v Speaker 3>understood something about that species. What are its numbers, what

835
00:54:20.800 --> 00:54:25.280
<v Speaker 3>are the what are the factors that may be impacting it?

836
00:54:25.559 --> 00:54:25.880
<v Speaker 2>What it?

837
00:54:26.639 --> 00:54:29.679
<v Speaker 3>You know, what are its social customs? You know, these

838
00:54:29.719 --> 00:54:31.960
<v Speaker 3>all these sorts of things of culture, if you will,

839
00:54:32.599 --> 00:54:36.679
<v Speaker 3>those things would all be very important. Because we don't

840
00:54:36.719 --> 00:54:39.679
<v Speaker 3>know at this page, I mean what we don't have

841
00:54:39.719 --> 00:54:43.599
<v Speaker 3>any idea, I mean, I don't have any idea whether, uh,

842
00:54:43.760 --> 00:54:48.119
<v Speaker 3>such a species even exists. If it does, what is

843
00:54:48.159 --> 00:54:48.639
<v Speaker 3>it like?

844
00:54:49.519 --> 00:54:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

845
00:54:50.159 --> 00:54:52.519
<v Speaker 3>Is it endangered? Do we need to make sure it's

846
00:54:52.559 --> 00:54:56.199
<v Speaker 3>on the endangered species list before we release this information?

847
00:54:56.920 --> 00:54:59.599
<v Speaker 3>What are what are those steps? Need to think very

848
00:54:59.639 --> 00:55:04.199
<v Speaker 3>careful because we want to be ethical about how we

849
00:55:04.719 --> 00:55:08.639
<v Speaker 3>how we we release not the information that it exists,

850
00:55:08.760 --> 00:55:14.000
<v Speaker 3>but release specific information that could potentially be used to

851
00:55:14.119 --> 00:55:15.239
<v Speaker 3>threaten that species.

852
00:55:15.760 --> 00:55:19.719
<v Speaker 2>If you did get a positive and my god, there's

853
00:55:19.760 --> 00:55:22.039
<v Speaker 2>something out there, there's a thing out there, and it's

854
00:55:22.039 --> 00:55:25.559
<v Speaker 2>it's it's it's here on the evolutionary tree, and blah

855
00:55:25.559 --> 00:55:27.119
<v Speaker 2>blah blah, you had all this that that you had

856
00:55:27.119 --> 00:55:29.679
<v Speaker 2>all the stuff that DNA could tell us about the

857
00:55:29.719 --> 00:55:33.440
<v Speaker 2>next step, the actually echo the actual ecological study of

858
00:55:33.559 --> 00:55:37.599
<v Speaker 2>these things would basically have to start from ground zero

859
00:55:37.800 --> 00:55:41.559
<v Speaker 2>because of the dubious nature of the vast majority of

860
00:55:41.599 --> 00:55:46.559
<v Speaker 2>the data that has been gathered thus far, even siding reports. Now,

861
00:55:46.639 --> 00:55:50.639
<v Speaker 2>luckily there's probably enough siding reports set statistically, you could

862
00:55:50.639 --> 00:55:53.239
<v Speaker 2>probably do some stuff and squeeze some information out of

863
00:55:53.239 --> 00:55:57.639
<v Speaker 2>it because the outliers would separate themselves. But between the

864
00:55:59.239 --> 00:56:04.719
<v Speaker 2>cultural and just the filters that the investigators who listen

865
00:56:04.760 --> 00:56:08.079
<v Speaker 2>to these reports, who recorded these reports even even they're

866
00:56:08.159 --> 00:56:11.119
<v Speaker 2>like cultural perspective and all that comes into play here.

867
00:56:11.320 --> 00:56:15.159
<v Speaker 2>And this isn't a this is not an objective database.

868
00:56:15.199 --> 00:56:17.599
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of subjectivity in here, as there would

869
00:56:17.639 --> 00:56:23.320
<v Speaker 2>be with any soft evidence like testimony. I imagine a

870
00:56:23.320 --> 00:56:26.880
<v Speaker 2>thorough ecologic study of these these critters would be five

871
00:56:26.960 --> 00:56:29.880
<v Speaker 2>or ten years down the road, because scientists who've been

872
00:56:29.920 --> 00:56:33.559
<v Speaker 2>denying their existence for so long, no, far less than

873
00:56:33.840 --> 00:56:36.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, us amateur investigators do at this point, even

874
00:56:36.960 --> 00:56:40.239
<v Speaker 2>though much of probably what the vast majority of bigfooters

875
00:56:40.320 --> 00:56:42.960
<v Speaker 2>think will probably be proven wrong at some point, you know,

876
00:56:43.079 --> 00:56:48.039
<v Speaker 2>or certainly vastly refined. Are you suggesting that if you

877
00:56:48.159 --> 00:56:50.239
<v Speaker 2>did get a hit that you think would be strong

878
00:56:50.360 --> 00:56:53.639
<v Speaker 2>enough to prove the species, at least to geneticists who

879
00:56:53.719 --> 00:56:56.559
<v Speaker 2>understand the sort of data, that it may not be

880
00:56:56.599 --> 00:57:01.440
<v Speaker 2>announced for until an ecological study is done on the animal,

881
00:57:01.480 --> 00:57:03.119
<v Speaker 2>which could take five or ten years.

882
00:57:03.480 --> 00:57:07.480
<v Speaker 3>No, No, I'm not suggesting that. What I'm suggesting, though,

883
00:57:07.679 --> 00:57:12.119
<v Speaker 3>is is that if, for example, such a thing we're

884
00:57:12.159 --> 00:57:14.960
<v Speaker 3>shown and there were a specific you know, there were

885
00:57:15.039 --> 00:57:20.920
<v Speaker 3>specific novel DNA sequences that identified this species versus any

886
00:57:21.000 --> 00:57:26.119
<v Speaker 3>other species on the planet, right, which is that's what

887
00:57:26.239 --> 00:57:29.599
<v Speaker 3>DNA does. When you have a full genome, you have

888
00:57:29.639 --> 00:57:33.119
<v Speaker 3>a new species, you have a known species. The problem

889
00:57:33.239 --> 00:57:39.000
<v Speaker 3>then is that releasing the particular sequence could potentially put

890
00:57:39.039 --> 00:57:44.920
<v Speaker 3>it in the hands of individuals or particularly potentially corporations

891
00:57:45.440 --> 00:57:51.239
<v Speaker 3>to create primers specific for that species that could that

892
00:57:51.320 --> 00:57:57.239
<v Speaker 3>could enable the species to be tracked down, hunted, so

893
00:57:57.320 --> 00:58:03.079
<v Speaker 3>on and so forth. So again we're talking we're talking

894
00:58:03.119 --> 00:58:06.679
<v Speaker 3>a what if scenario here. But it wouldn't be responsible

895
00:58:06.719 --> 00:58:08.480
<v Speaker 3>of me to even if I think that there's a

896
00:58:08.559 --> 00:58:12.159
<v Speaker 3>very small chance of that happening, it wouldn't be responsible

897
00:58:12.159 --> 00:58:14.039
<v Speaker 3>of me to not think a little bit down the

898
00:58:14.119 --> 00:58:18.599
<v Speaker 3>road about that. But even thinking about the just think,

899
00:58:18.719 --> 00:58:23.519
<v Speaker 3>for example, about the pharmaceutical industry, Well, the pharmaceutical companies

900
00:58:23.639 --> 00:58:27.800
<v Speaker 3>might be competing with one another to try to track

901
00:58:27.880 --> 00:58:31.880
<v Speaker 3>down such a species that would presumably be closely related

902
00:58:31.920 --> 00:58:37.840
<v Speaker 3>to human because of the possible discoveries to be had

903
00:58:37.880 --> 00:58:41.000
<v Speaker 3>there and the possible money. Yeah, so I think the

904
00:58:41.039 --> 00:58:45.159
<v Speaker 3>bottom line is just that you know, not the not

905
00:58:45.320 --> 00:58:49.840
<v Speaker 3>the fact of a new species, but specific information about

906
00:58:49.880 --> 00:58:56.719
<v Speaker 3>that species that could compromise a population. That's the information

907
00:58:57.000 --> 00:59:01.840
<v Speaker 3>that might might need to be very close to the

908
00:59:01.960 --> 00:59:06.760
<v Speaker 3>vest for a while. What's interesting to me about this

909
00:59:07.039 --> 00:59:11.360
<v Speaker 3>is the range of folks who are really excited about

910
00:59:11.400 --> 00:59:16.480
<v Speaker 3>this study. And I get it. I know that some

911
00:59:16.559 --> 00:59:21.320
<v Speaker 3>people are using the term historic, and I have to confess, yes,

912
00:59:21.960 --> 00:59:27.079
<v Speaker 3>it really is. To have the team that's working on

913
00:59:27.199 --> 00:59:32.039
<v Speaker 3>this to have these things looked at in a scientifically

914
00:59:32.159 --> 00:59:35.599
<v Speaker 3>credible way. That this is not just we're going to

915
00:59:35.599 --> 00:59:39.119
<v Speaker 3>look at eight or twelve or fifteen samples and call

916
00:59:39.199 --> 00:59:45.840
<v Speaker 3>it a day. It is historic. I find support, on

917
00:59:45.920 --> 00:59:49.280
<v Speaker 3>the one hand, from folks in the bigfoot community who

918
00:59:49.360 --> 00:59:53.239
<v Speaker 3>are convinced that this will be the study that's finally

919
00:59:53.239 --> 00:59:58.119
<v Speaker 3>going to prove the Bigfoot as a species. I also

920
00:59:58.159 --> 01:00:02.039
<v Speaker 3>have part folks who are more Scout in their ideas,

921
01:00:02.079 --> 01:00:05.079
<v Speaker 3>who think, ah, this is finally going to be the

922
01:00:05.119 --> 01:00:08.920
<v Speaker 3>study that looks at lots and lots of the quote

923
01:00:09.000 --> 01:00:13.280
<v Speaker 3>unquote best samples and figures out that they're all known species,

924
01:00:13.320 --> 01:00:16.719
<v Speaker 3>and maybe this Bigfoot thing will go away. I have

925
01:00:16.800 --> 01:00:19.400
<v Speaker 3>people who say, Oh, this is going to find that

926
01:00:20.119 --> 01:00:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Bigfoot is descended from the given family. I have others

927
01:00:23.880 --> 01:00:26.840
<v Speaker 3>who say, Aha, this is what's finally going to show

928
01:00:26.880 --> 01:00:33.800
<v Speaker 3>that it's descended from Paranthropus. You know, everybody has their ideas.

929
01:00:33.920 --> 01:00:38.079
<v Speaker 3>Everybody has their thoughts as to what we'll find. I'm

930
01:00:38.159 --> 01:00:42.800
<v Speaker 3>just really curious. I'm just really curious to see what

931
01:00:42.880 --> 01:00:46.639
<v Speaker 3>do we have here? And it will be what it is.

932
01:00:47.199 --> 01:00:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, to summarize John Green into Hindon, something is making

933
01:00:50.960 --> 01:00:53.079
<v Speaker 2>these footprints, and it sounds to me like you're just

934
01:00:53.119 --> 01:00:55.519
<v Speaker 2>on a quest to find out what it is. Except

935
01:00:55.519 --> 01:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>now we're living in a more modern age. It's no

936
01:00:57.920 --> 01:01:01.159
<v Speaker 2>longer just footprints. It's actually DNA and by aloe logical material.

937
01:01:01.360 --> 01:01:02.199
<v Speaker 2>So fantastic.

938
01:01:02.800 --> 01:01:03.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm excited.

939
01:01:03.880 --> 01:01:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, Darby, thank you so much for coming on and

940
01:01:05.880 --> 01:01:08.639
<v Speaker 2>sharing about the project. This is an exciting thing. I

941
01:01:08.639 --> 01:01:12.400
<v Speaker 2>think any bigfooter who is looking at the goalpost here

942
01:01:12.519 --> 01:01:15.079
<v Speaker 2>and wondering like, can we can we move the ball? Well,

943
01:01:15.239 --> 01:01:17.559
<v Speaker 2>I shouldn't use sports metaphor, as you know me, but man,

944
01:01:17.679 --> 01:01:21.199
<v Speaker 2>any bigfooter that wants wants some sort of resolution to

945
01:01:21.239 --> 01:01:25.079
<v Speaker 2>this should be excited about this project. And I can't.

946
01:01:25.159 --> 01:01:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I can't do anything else but wish you the best

947
01:01:26.960 --> 01:01:28.559
<v Speaker 2>of luck. But I'll tell you I'm going to put

948
01:01:28.599 --> 01:01:30.920
<v Speaker 2>my boots on the ground in my best areas and

949
01:01:30.920 --> 01:01:32.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to put the word out to all the

950
01:01:32.159 --> 01:01:36.159
<v Speaker 2>best researchers I personally know to participate in this, and

951
01:01:36.199 --> 01:01:38.079
<v Speaker 2>of course it is open to anybody. If you have

952
01:01:38.360 --> 01:01:41.039
<v Speaker 2>our listeners, if you have bigfoots on the property, this

953
01:01:41.079 --> 01:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>is an opportunity for you to participate as well. Who knows,

954
01:01:43.440 --> 01:01:45.719
<v Speaker 2>it could be your sample to actually, you know, win

955
01:01:45.760 --> 01:01:48.360
<v Speaker 2>the game here. So show that the links are in

956
01:01:48.400 --> 01:01:52.559
<v Speaker 2>the show notes of places you can submit samples, like

957
01:01:52.599 --> 01:01:54.119
<v Speaker 2>if you want to fill out the entry form for

958
01:01:54.199 --> 01:01:56.519
<v Speaker 2>Darby's project, the link is in the show notes. And

959
01:01:56.559 --> 01:01:59.719
<v Speaker 2>also something we didn't mention, this is an ongoing project.

960
01:01:59.719 --> 01:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>There is no I mean Darby said it several times,

961
01:02:01.800 --> 01:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>there is no. There's not necessarily a budget that is

962
01:02:04.360 --> 01:02:06.079
<v Speaker 2>going to run out here. But it's not like they

963
01:02:06.079 --> 01:02:08.320
<v Speaker 2>couldn't use a little extra money either. And there is

964
01:02:08.360 --> 01:02:10.639
<v Speaker 2>a donation form. We'll put that link in the show

965
01:02:10.639 --> 01:02:14.000
<v Speaker 2>notes as well. If you want to throw fifty bucks

966
01:02:14.119 --> 01:02:17.079
<v Speaker 2>or five bucks, even how about a dollar anything towards it.

967
01:02:17.079 --> 01:02:19.119
<v Speaker 2>It goes straight to the university. And this study is

968
01:02:19.119 --> 01:02:20.920
<v Speaker 2>that correct, Derby? Is that the way people can help

969
01:02:20.960 --> 01:02:21.760
<v Speaker 2>out and participate.

970
01:02:22.039 --> 01:02:27.159
<v Speaker 3>Yes, any donations are a tax deductible donations to the

971
01:02:27.239 --> 01:02:32.519
<v Speaker 3>nonprofit the North Carolina State University, and they are are

972
01:02:32.639 --> 01:02:36.199
<v Speaker 3>earmarked for my research area. As you'll see.

973
01:02:36.039 --> 01:02:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Online, fantastic. We're not shaking our tin cup. But some

974
01:02:39.360 --> 01:02:41.239
<v Speaker 2>people out there may not have samples or may have

975
01:02:41.280 --> 01:02:43.039
<v Speaker 2>no hope of getting any and maybe they want to

976
01:02:43.079 --> 01:02:46.199
<v Speaker 2>participate in some other way as well. So there is

977
01:02:46.280 --> 01:02:49.039
<v Speaker 2>that any final thoughts Derby before we get going.

978
01:02:49.400 --> 01:02:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I really appreciate I really appreciate y'all getting the

979
01:02:53.000 --> 01:02:57.320
<v Speaker 3>word out. I think that we folks need to understand

980
01:02:57.360 --> 01:03:00.679
<v Speaker 3>that we can't find what we're not offered samples of.

981
01:03:01.559 --> 01:03:07.199
<v Speaker 3>So this is the opportunity for those who who feel

982
01:03:07.239 --> 01:03:10.400
<v Speaker 3>like they have something compelling, this is the opportunity to

983
01:03:10.440 --> 01:03:13.000
<v Speaker 3>present it. This is the opportunity to find out what

984
01:03:13.119 --> 01:03:18.280
<v Speaker 3>it is. Bottom line, this is the opportunity and it

985
01:03:18.320 --> 01:03:19.559
<v Speaker 3>depends on you.

986
01:03:20.119 --> 01:03:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much, Darby. We really appreciate your expertise,

987
01:03:22.920 --> 01:03:27.400
<v Speaker 2>your talents and the opportunity to maybe get this thing done.

988
01:03:27.440 --> 01:03:29.440
<v Speaker 2>And thank you so much for coming on the podcast.

989
01:03:29.800 --> 01:03:31.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thanks for what you're doing it. Thanks for coming on, Sharon.

990
01:03:32.360 --> 01:03:35.320
<v Speaker 4>All right, folks, you heard it here. You got Darby

991
01:03:35.440 --> 01:03:38.719
<v Speaker 4>Orca from NC State University. They're on the case. So

992
01:03:39.039 --> 01:03:42.239
<v Speaker 4>let's get up some samples and until next week you

993
01:03:42.320 --> 01:03:48.199
<v Speaker 4>all know what to do. Keep it Squatchy.

994
01:03:49.800 --> 01:03:53.079
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to this week's episode of Bigfoot and Beyond.

995
01:03:53.480 --> 01:03:55.760
<v Speaker 2>If you liked what you heard, please rate and review

996
01:03:55.840 --> 01:03:59.159
<v Speaker 2>us on iTunes, subscribe to Bigfoot and Beyond wherever you

997
01:03:59.159 --> 01:04:01.880
<v Speaker 2>get your podcast us, and follow us on Facebook and

998
01:04:01.920 --> 01:04:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Instagram at Bigfoot and Beyond podcast. You can find us

999
01:04:05.880 --> 01:04:09.239
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter at Bigfoot and Beyond that's an N in

1000
01:04:09.280 --> 01:04:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the middle, and tweet us your thoughts and questions with

1001
01:04:12.400 --> 01:04:15.119
<v Speaker 2>the hashtag Bigfoot and Beyond.
