WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.159 --> 00:00:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Chapter sixteen, Part three of A Short Account of the

2
00:00:05.040 --> 00:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>History of Mathematics. This is a LibriVox recording. All LibriVox

3
00:00:10.919 --> 00:00:14.759
<v Speaker 1>recordings are in the public domain. For more information or

4
00:00:14.800 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>to volunteer, please visit LibriVox dot org. This reading is

5
00:00:20.280 --> 00:00:23.719
<v Speaker 1>by Paul King p J K dot scripts dot mit

6
00:00:23.960 --> 00:00:28.199
<v Speaker 1>dot ed U forward slash p k J. A Short

7
00:00:28.199 --> 00:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Account of the History of Mathematics by W. W. Rowseball,

8
00:00:33.520 --> 00:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Chapter sixteen, The Life and Works of Newton, Part three.

9
00:00:39.679 --> 00:00:44.039
<v Speaker 1>In seventeen o four, Newton published his Optics, which contains

10
00:00:44.079 --> 00:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the results of papers already mentioned the first edition of

11
00:00:48.960 --> 00:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>this book were appended to two minor works which have

12
00:00:52.399 --> 00:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>no special connection with Optics, one being on cubic curves,

13
00:00:57.159 --> 00:01:00.799
<v Speaker 1>the other on the quadrature of curves and u on fluxions.

14
00:01:01.920 --> 00:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Both of them were old manuscripts with which his friends

15
00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and pupils were familiar, but they were here published ubi

16
00:01:08.760 --> 00:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>et orbi for the first time. The first of these

17
00:01:13.159 --> 00:01:19.159
<v Speaker 1>appendices is entitled Umeratio linierm terti rorubdinis. The object seems

18
00:01:19.200 --> 00:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to be to illustrate the use of analytical geometry, and

19
00:01:23.200 --> 00:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>as the application to conics was well known, Newton selected

20
00:01:27.040 --> 00:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the theory of cubics. He begins with some general theorems

21
00:01:31.599 --> 00:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and classifies curves according as to whether their equations are

22
00:01:35.719 --> 00:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>algebraical or transcendental, the former being cut by a straight

23
00:01:40.400 --> 00:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>line in a number of points real or imaginary equal

24
00:01:44.200 --> 00:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to the degree of the curve, the latter being cut

25
00:01:47.799 --> 00:01:50.799
<v Speaker 1>by a straight line and an infinite number of points.

26
00:01:52.319 --> 00:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Newton then choose that many of the most important properties

27
00:01:55.760 --> 00:01:59.519
<v Speaker 1>of conics have their analogs in the theory of cubics,

28
00:02:00.239 --> 00:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and he discusses the theory of asymptotes and curve linear diameters.

29
00:02:07.000 --> 00:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>After these general theorems, he commences his detailed examination of

30
00:02:11.400 --> 00:02:14.599
<v Speaker 1>cubics by pointing out that a cubic must have at

31
00:02:14.680 --> 00:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>least one real point at infinity. If the asymptote or

32
00:02:18.879 --> 00:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>tangent at this point be a finite distance, it may

33
00:02:22.400 --> 00:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>be taken for the axis of y. This asymptote will

34
00:02:26.439 --> 00:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>cut the curve in three points altogether, of which at

35
00:02:30.080 --> 00:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>least two are an infinity. If the third point be

36
00:02:34.120 --> 00:02:37.599
<v Speaker 1>a finite distance, then by one of his general theorems

37
00:02:37.599 --> 00:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>on asymptotes, the equation can be written in the form

38
00:02:40.919 --> 00:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>of x y squared plus h y equals ax cubed

39
00:02:46.120 --> 00:02:50.479
<v Speaker 1>plus b x squared plus c x plus d, where

40
00:02:50.520 --> 00:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the axes of X and Y are the asymptotes of

41
00:02:53.159 --> 00:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the hyperbola, which is the locus of the middle points

42
00:02:57.080 --> 00:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of all chords drawn parallel to the axis of While

43
00:03:01.680 --> 00:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>if on the third point in which this asymptote cuts

44
00:03:04.879 --> 00:03:08.479
<v Speaker 1>the curve be also at infinity, the equation can be

45
00:03:08.520 --> 00:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>written in the form x y equals ax cube plus

46
00:03:12.680 --> 00:03:17.199
<v Speaker 1>b x squared plus c x plus d. Next, he

47
00:03:17.280 --> 00:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>takes the case where the tangent at the real point

48
00:03:19.800 --> 00:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>at infinity is not at a finite distance. A line

49
00:03:24.240 --> 00:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>parallel to the direction in which the curve goes to

50
00:03:27.360 --> 00:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>infinity may be taken as the axis of Y. Any

51
00:03:32.280 --> 00:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>such line will cut the curve in three points altogether,

52
00:03:36.159 --> 00:03:40.479
<v Speaker 1>of which one is by hypothesis at infinity and one

53
00:03:40.560 --> 00:03:45.319
<v Speaker 1>is necessarily at a finite distance. He then choose that

54
00:03:45.439 --> 00:03:48.639
<v Speaker 1>if the remaining point in which this line cuts the

55
00:03:48.680 --> 00:03:51.719
<v Speaker 1>curve be at a finite distance, the equation can be

56
00:03:51.759 --> 00:03:55.639
<v Speaker 1>written in the form hy squared equals ax cube plus

57
00:03:55.680 --> 00:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>b x squared plus c x plus d, while if

58
00:03:59.120 --> 00:04:02.319
<v Speaker 1>it be at an infinite distance, the equation can be

59
00:04:02.400 --> 00:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>written in the form why equals axqube plus bx squared

60
00:04:06.840 --> 00:04:12.479
<v Speaker 1>plus cx plus d. Any cubic is therefore reducible to

61
00:04:12.560 --> 00:04:16.879
<v Speaker 1>one of the four characteristic forms. Each of these forms

62
00:04:17.199 --> 00:04:20.519
<v Speaker 1>is then discussed in detail, and the possibility of the

63
00:04:20.560 --> 00:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>existence of double points, isolated ovals, et cetera is worked out.

64
00:04:25.879 --> 00:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>The final result is that in all, there are seventy

65
00:04:29.600 --> 00:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>eight possible forms which a cubic may take. Of these,

66
00:04:33.959 --> 00:04:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Newton enumerated only seventy two. Four of the remainder were

67
00:04:38.240 --> 00:04:41.959
<v Speaker 1>mentioned by Sterling in seventeen seventeen, and one by Nicole

68
00:04:42.120 --> 00:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in seventeen thirty one, and one by Nicholas Bernoulli at

69
00:04:46.360 --> 00:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>about the same time. In the course of the work,

70
00:04:49.680 --> 00:04:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Newton states the remarkable theorem that just as the shadow

71
00:04:53.480 --> 00:04:56.199
<v Speaker 1>of a circle cast by a luminous point on a

72
00:04:56.240 --> 00:05:01.879
<v Speaker 1>plane gives rise to all the conics, so the shadows

73
00:05:01.920 --> 00:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of the curves represented by the equation y squared equals

74
00:05:06.040 --> 00:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>ax cube plus bx squared plus c x plus d

75
00:05:09.800 --> 00:05:13.879
<v Speaker 1>give rise to all the cubics. This remained an unsolved

76
00:05:13.920 --> 00:05:18.959
<v Speaker 1>puzzle until seventeen thirty one, when Nicole and Clairot gave

77
00:05:19.120 --> 00:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>demonstrations of it. A better proof is that given by

78
00:05:22.920 --> 00:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch in seventeen forty, which depends on the classification of

79
00:05:27.279 --> 00:05:31.439
<v Speaker 1>these curves into five species, according to as to whether

80
00:05:31.920 --> 00:05:34.759
<v Speaker 1>their points of intersection with the axis of X are

81
00:05:34.839 --> 00:05:38.879
<v Speaker 1>real and unequal, real and two of them equal, two

82
00:05:38.959 --> 00:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>cases real and all equal, or finally two imaginary and

83
00:05:44.120 --> 00:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>one real. In this tract, Newton also discusses double points

84
00:05:50.120 --> 00:05:54.199
<v Speaker 1>in the plane and at infinity, and the description of

85
00:05:54.319 --> 00:05:59.879
<v Speaker 1>curves satisfying given conditions, and the graphical solution of pro

86
00:06:00.000 --> 00:06:04.759
<v Speaker 1>problems by the use of curves. The second appendix to

87
00:06:04.839 --> 00:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the Optics is entitled des Quadratura corvorum. Most of it

88
00:06:11.120 --> 00:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>had been communicated to Barrow in sixteen sixty eight or

89
00:06:14.600 --> 00:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>sixteen sixty nine, and probably was familiar to Newton's pupils

90
00:06:18.399 --> 00:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and friends from that time onwards. It consists of two parts.

91
00:06:23.839 --> 00:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>The bulk of the first part is a statement of

92
00:06:26.399 --> 00:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Newton's method of affecting the quadrature and the rectification of

93
00:06:30.560 --> 00:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>curves by means of infinite series. It is noticeable as

94
00:06:35.560 --> 00:06:40.759
<v Speaker 1>containing the earliest use in print of literal indices, and

95
00:06:40.959 --> 00:06:45.439
<v Speaker 1>also the first printed statement of the binomial theorem, but

96
00:06:45.519 --> 00:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>these are introduced only Incidentally, the main object is to

97
00:06:49.959 --> 00:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>give rules for developing a function of X in a

98
00:06:53.279 --> 00:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>series of ascending powers of X, so as to enable

99
00:06:56.759 --> 00:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>mathematicians to effect the quadrature of any curve in which

100
00:07:00.839 --> 00:07:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the ordinate y can be expressed as an explicit algebraical

101
00:07:04.720 --> 00:07:10.959
<v Speaker 1>function of the ebscissa X. Wallace had shewn how this

102
00:07:11.079 --> 00:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>quadrature could be found when y was given as a

103
00:07:14.079 --> 00:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>sum of a number of multiples of powers of X,

104
00:07:17.800 --> 00:07:23.199
<v Speaker 1>and Newton's rules of expansion here established rendered possible the

105
00:07:23.279 --> 00:07:27.439
<v Speaker 1>similar quadrature of any curve whose ordinate can be expressed

106
00:07:27.439 --> 00:07:30.279
<v Speaker 1>as a sum of an infinite number of such terms.

107
00:07:31.439 --> 00:07:34.519
<v Speaker 1>In this way, he affects the quadrature of the curves

108
00:07:34.720 --> 00:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>y equals a square divided by the quantity b plus x,

109
00:07:40.319 --> 00:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Y equals the square root of a squared plus or

110
00:07:44.240 --> 00:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>minus x squared, or y equals the square root of

111
00:07:49.439 --> 00:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>x minus x squared, or y equals the square root

112
00:07:55.879 --> 00:08:00.199
<v Speaker 1>of one minus a x squared divided by the square

113
00:08:00.279 --> 00:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>root of one minus b x squared. But the results

114
00:08:04.360 --> 00:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>are of course expressed as infinite series. He then proceeds

115
00:08:08.759 --> 00:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to curves whose ordinate is given as an implicit function

116
00:08:11.879 --> 00:08:14.639
<v Speaker 1>of the obsessor, and he gives a method by which

117
00:08:14.800 --> 00:08:17.839
<v Speaker 1>y can be expressed as an infinite series and ascending

118
00:08:17.920 --> 00:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>powers of x. But the application of the rule to

119
00:08:21.120 --> 00:08:26.199
<v Speaker 1>any curve demands, in general such complicated numerical calculations as

120
00:08:26.199 --> 00:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to render it of little value. He concludes this part

121
00:08:30.759 --> 00:08:33.879
<v Speaker 1>by shewing that the rectification of a curve can be

122
00:08:33.919 --> 00:08:38.399
<v Speaker 1>effected in a somewhat similar way. His process is equivalent

123
00:08:38.440 --> 00:08:41.879
<v Speaker 1>to finding the integral with regard to x of the

124
00:08:41.879 --> 00:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>square root of one plus y squared in the form

125
00:08:45.120 --> 00:08:49.519
<v Speaker 1>of an infinite series. I should add that Newton indicates

126
00:08:49.559 --> 00:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the importance of determining whether the series are convergent, an

127
00:08:53.799 --> 00:08:57.799
<v Speaker 1>observation far in advance of his time, But he knew

128
00:08:57.879 --> 00:09:00.879
<v Speaker 1>of no general test for the purpose, and in fact

129
00:09:00.960 --> 00:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it was not until Gaussenkoschi took up the question that

130
00:09:04.279 --> 00:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the necessity of such limitations were commonly recognized. The part

131
00:09:09.360 --> 00:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of the appendix which I have just described is practically

132
00:09:12.360 --> 00:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the same as Newton's manuscript Diannealisi periqueisiones numero to menora minfinitas,

133
00:09:19.120 --> 00:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>which was subsequently printed in seventeen eleven. It is said

134
00:09:23.720 --> 00:09:26.519
<v Speaker 1>that this was originally intended to form an appendix to

135
00:09:26.600 --> 00:09:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Kinkhousen's algebra. The substance of it was communicated to Brow

136
00:09:31.960 --> 00:09:34.799
<v Speaker 1>and by him to Collins and letters of July thirty

137
00:09:34.840 --> 00:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>first and August twelfth, sixteen sixty nine, and a summary

138
00:09:39.240 --> 00:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of part of it was included in a letter of

139
00:09:42.039 --> 00:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>October twenty fourth, sixteen seventy six, sent to Leibniz. It

140
00:09:47.039 --> 00:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>should be read in connection with Newton's methodis differentialis published

141
00:09:51.559 --> 00:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>in seventeen thirty six. Some additional theorems are there given,

142
00:09:56.799 --> 00:10:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and he discusses his method of interpolation, which which had

143
00:10:00.279 --> 00:10:03.919
<v Speaker 1>been briefly described in the letter of October twenty fourth,

144
00:10:04.039 --> 00:10:08.759
<v Speaker 1>sixteen seventy six. The principle is this, if y equals

145
00:10:08.799 --> 00:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>fi x be a function of x, and if when

146
00:10:11.799 --> 00:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>x is successively put equal to a one, a, two,

147
00:10:15.240 --> 00:10:19.279
<v Speaker 1>and so on, the values of y be known, and b,

148
00:10:19.399 --> 00:10:23.039
<v Speaker 1>b one, b two, and so on, then a parabola

149
00:10:23.039 --> 00:10:26.639
<v Speaker 1>whose equation is y equals p plus q x plus

150
00:10:26.759 --> 00:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>r x squared plus so on can be drawn through

151
00:10:31.159 --> 00:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>the points A one, b one, a two, b two,

152
00:10:33.759 --> 00:10:37.279
<v Speaker 1>and so on, And the ordinate of this parabola may

153
00:10:37.320 --> 00:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>be taken as an approximation to the ordinate of the

154
00:10:40.399 --> 00:10:43.919
<v Speaker 1>curve the degree of the parabola will, of course be

155
00:10:44.000 --> 00:10:47.399
<v Speaker 1>one less than the number of the given points. Newton

156
00:10:47.600 --> 00:10:51.039
<v Speaker 1>points out that in this way the areas of any

157
00:10:51.159 --> 00:10:55.399
<v Speaker 1>curves can be approximately determined. The second part of this

158
00:10:55.480 --> 00:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>appendix to the optics, contained in a description of Newton's method,

159
00:10:59.399 --> 00:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>is fluction. This is best considered in connection with Newton's

160
00:11:03.360 --> 00:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>manuscript on the same subject, which was published by John

161
00:11:06.399 --> 00:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Coulson in seventeen thirty six, and of which it is

162
00:11:10.120 --> 00:11:15.279
<v Speaker 1>a summary. The fluctional calculus is one form of the

163
00:11:15.360 --> 00:11:20.519
<v Speaker 1>infinitesimal calculus expressed in a certain notation, just as the

164
00:11:20.559 --> 00:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>differential calculus is another aspect of the same calculus expressed

165
00:11:24.879 --> 00:11:30.799
<v Speaker 1>in a different notation. Newton assumed that all geometrical magnitudes

166
00:11:30.879 --> 00:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>must be conceived as generated by continuous motion. Thus a

167
00:11:35.639 --> 00:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>line may be considered as generated by the motion of

168
00:11:38.600 --> 00:11:42.159
<v Speaker 1>a point, a surface by that of a line, a

169
00:11:42.360 --> 00:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>solid by that of a surface, a plane angle by

170
00:11:45.840 --> 00:11:49.559
<v Speaker 1>the rotation of a line, and so on. The quantity

171
00:11:49.639 --> 00:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>thus generated was defined by him as the fluent or

172
00:11:53.639 --> 00:11:58.759
<v Speaker 1>flowing quantity. The velocity of the moving magnitude was defined

173
00:11:58.759 --> 00:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>as the fluxion of the f fluent. This seems to

174
00:12:02.159 --> 00:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>be the earliest definite recognition of the idea of a

175
00:12:05.919 --> 00:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>continuous function, though it had been foreshadowed in some of

176
00:12:10.440 --> 00:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Napier's papers. The following is a summary of Newton's treatment

177
00:12:15.480 --> 00:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of fluctions. There are two kinds of problems. The object

178
00:12:19.279 --> 00:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of the first is to find the fluxion of a

179
00:12:21.759 --> 00:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>given quantity, or more generally, the relation of the fluence

180
00:12:25.759 --> 00:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>being given, to find the relation of their fluctions. This

181
00:12:30.399 --> 00:12:34.919
<v Speaker 1>is equivalent to differentiation. The object of the second, or

182
00:12:34.919 --> 00:12:38.159
<v Speaker 1>inverse method of fluctions is from the fluxion or some

183
00:12:38.399 --> 00:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>relations involving it, to determine the fluent or more generally,

184
00:12:43.960 --> 00:12:48.039
<v Speaker 1>an equation being proposed exhibiting the relation of the fluxions

185
00:12:48.120 --> 00:12:51.639
<v Speaker 1>of quantities to find the relations of those quantities or

186
00:12:51.679 --> 00:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>fluence to one another. This is equivalent either to integration,

187
00:12:56.559 --> 00:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>which Newton termed the method of quadrature, or to the

188
00:13:01.399 --> 00:13:04.759
<v Speaker 1>solution of a differential equation, which was called by Newton

189
00:13:05.200 --> 00:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the inverse method of tangents. The methods for solving these

190
00:13:10.080 --> 00:13:13.919
<v Speaker 1>problems are discussed at considerable length. Newton then went on

191
00:13:14.000 --> 00:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to apply these results to questions connected with the maxima

192
00:13:18.000 --> 00:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and minima of quantities. The method of drawing tangents to

193
00:13:22.279 --> 00:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>curves and the curvature of curves, namely the determination of

194
00:13:27.240 --> 00:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the center of curvature, the radius of curvature, and the

195
00:13:31.200 --> 00:13:35.559
<v Speaker 1>rate at which the radius of curvature increases. He next

196
00:13:35.639 --> 00:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>considered the quadrature of curves and the rectification of curves.

197
00:13:40.840 --> 00:13:45.399
<v Speaker 1>In finding the maximum and minimum of functions of one variable,

198
00:13:45.480 --> 00:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>we regard the change of sign of the difference between

199
00:13:48.519 --> 00:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>two consecutive values of the function as the true criterion.

200
00:13:53.919 --> 00:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>But his argument is that when a quantity increasing has

201
00:13:58.240 --> 00:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>attained its maximum, it can have no further increment, or

202
00:14:02.919 --> 00:14:05.919
<v Speaker 1>when decreasing, it has attained its minimum and can have

203
00:14:06.000 --> 00:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>no further decrement. Consequently, the fluction must be equal to nothing.

204
00:14:12.320 --> 00:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>It has been remarked that neither Newton nor Lobbyingits produced

205
00:14:16.399 --> 00:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a calculus that is a classified collection of rules, and

206
00:14:21.080 --> 00:14:25.559
<v Speaker 1>that the problems they discussed were treated from first principles.

207
00:14:26.240 --> 00:14:28.919
<v Speaker 1>That no doubt is the usual sequence in the history

208
00:14:28.960 --> 00:14:33.039
<v Speaker 1>of such discoveries, though the fact is frequently forgotten by

209
00:14:33.080 --> 00:14:37.039
<v Speaker 1>subsequent writers. In this case, I think the statement, so

210
00:14:37.159 --> 00:14:40.279
<v Speaker 1>far as Newton's treatment of the differential or fluctional part

211
00:14:40.279 --> 00:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of the calculus is concerned, is incorrect, as the foregoing

212
00:14:44.279 --> 00:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>account sufficiently shoes. If a flowing quantity or fluent were

213
00:14:50.519 --> 00:14:56.039
<v Speaker 1>represented by x, Newton denoted its fluxion by x dot,

214
00:14:56.480 --> 00:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and the fluxions of x dot or second flunction of

215
00:15:00.480 --> 00:15:04.279
<v Speaker 1>x by x dot dot, and so on. Similarly, the

216
00:15:04.320 --> 00:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>fluent of x was denoted by x written in a box,

217
00:15:07.639 --> 00:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes by x prime or x inside square brackets.

218
00:15:13.480 --> 00:15:16.679
<v Speaker 1>The infinitely small part by which a fluence such as

219
00:15:16.919 --> 00:15:19.759
<v Speaker 1>x increased in a small interval of time measured by

220
00:15:19.799 --> 00:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>omicron was called the moment of the fluent, and its

221
00:15:23.440 --> 00:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>value was shown to be x dot omicron. Newton adds

222
00:15:28.360 --> 00:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the important remark that thus we may, in any problem

223
00:15:32.240 --> 00:15:35.759
<v Speaker 1>neglect the terms multiplied by the second and higher powers

224
00:15:35.759 --> 00:15:39.279
<v Speaker 1>of omicron, and we can always find an equation between

225
00:15:39.360 --> 00:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the coordinates of x y of a point on a

226
00:15:43.080 --> 00:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>curve and their fluxions x dot y dot. It is

227
00:15:48.399 --> 00:15:51.679
<v Speaker 1>an application of this principle which constitutes one of the

228
00:15:51.759 --> 00:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>chief values of calculus. For if we desire to find

229
00:15:56.360 --> 00:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the effect produced by several causes of a system, then

230
00:16:00.000 --> 00:16:02.279
<v Speaker 1>when and if we can find the effect produced by

231
00:16:02.360 --> 00:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>each cause when acting alone in a very small time,

232
00:16:06.480 --> 00:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the total effect produced in that time will be equal

233
00:16:09.399 --> 00:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to the sum of the separate effects. I should here

234
00:16:12.960 --> 00:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>note the fact that Vince and other English writers in

235
00:16:16.639 --> 00:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the eighteenth century used x dot to denote the increment

236
00:16:20.200 --> 00:16:23.919
<v Speaker 1>of x, and not the velocity with which it increased.

237
00:16:25.039 --> 00:16:28.159
<v Speaker 1>That is, x dot in their writing stands for what

238
00:16:28.240 --> 00:16:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Newton would have expressed by x dot omicron, and what

239
00:16:32.080 --> 00:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Leibnitz would have written as dx. I need not discuss

240
00:16:38.679 --> 00:16:42.159
<v Speaker 1>in detail the manner in which Newton treated the problem

241
00:16:42.279 --> 00:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>above mentioned. I will only add that, in spite of

242
00:16:46.000 --> 00:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the form of his definition, the introduction into geometry of

243
00:16:50.320 --> 00:16:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the idea of time was evaded by supposing that some

244
00:16:54.000 --> 00:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>quantity e g. The absissa of a point on a

245
00:16:57.000 --> 00:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>curve increased equably, and the required results then depend on

246
00:17:02.600 --> 00:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the rate at which other quantities e g. The ordinate

247
00:17:06.279 --> 00:17:09.839
<v Speaker 1>or the radius of curvature increased relatively to the one

248
00:17:09.920 --> 00:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>so chosen. The fluence so chosen is what we now

249
00:17:13.960 --> 00:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>call the independent variable. Its fluction was termed the principal fluction,

250
00:17:20.400 --> 00:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>and of course if it were denoted by x, then

251
00:17:23.359 --> 00:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>x dot was constant, and consequently x dot dot equalled zero.

252
00:17:29.440 --> 00:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>There is no question that Newton used the method of

253
00:17:31.960 --> 00:17:36.039
<v Speaker 1>Fluctions in sixteen sixty six, and it is practically certain

254
00:17:36.119 --> 00:17:40.079
<v Speaker 1>that accounts of it were communicated in manuscript to friends

255
00:17:40.079 --> 00:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and pupils from and after sixteen sixty nine. The manuscript

256
00:17:45.000 --> 00:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>from which most of the above summary has been taken

257
00:17:48.279 --> 00:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>is believed to have been written between sixteen seventy one

258
00:17:51.240 --> 00:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen seventy seven, and to have been in circulation

259
00:17:55.079 --> 00:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>at Cambridge from that time onward. It was unfortunate that

260
00:18:00.319 --> 00:18:03.799
<v Speaker 1>it was not published at once. Strangers at a distance

261
00:18:03.960 --> 00:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>naturally judged of the method by the letter to Wallace

262
00:18:07.319 --> 00:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen ninety two or by the Tractatus did Quadratura crverum,

263
00:18:12.319 --> 00:18:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and were not aware that it had been so completely

264
00:18:14.799 --> 00:18:18.079
<v Speaker 1>developed at an earlier date. This was the cause of

265
00:18:18.160 --> 00:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>numerous misunderstandings. At the same time, it must be added

266
00:18:23.039 --> 00:18:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that all mathematical analysis was leading up to the idea

267
00:18:27.039 --> 00:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>and methods of the infinitesimal calculus. Foreshadowings of the principles

268
00:18:32.359 --> 00:18:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and even of the language of that calculus can be

269
00:18:34.880 --> 00:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>found in the writings of Napier, Kepler, Cavalieri, Pascal Fermat, Wallace,

270
00:18:42.160 --> 00:18:45.759
<v Speaker 1>and Berrow. It was Newton's good luck to come at

271
00:18:45.799 --> 00:18:49.519
<v Speaker 1>a time when everything was ripe for the discovery, and

272
00:18:49.640 --> 00:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>his ability enabled him to construct almost at once a

273
00:18:52.960 --> 00:18:58.519
<v Speaker 1>complete calculus. The notation of the fluctional calculuses, for most

274
00:18:58.559 --> 00:19:03.799
<v Speaker 1>purposes less convenient than that of the differential calculus. The

275
00:19:03.920 --> 00:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>latter was invented by Libaneates in sixteen seventy five and

276
00:19:07.599 --> 00:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>published in sixteen eighty four, some nine years before the

277
00:19:11.279 --> 00:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>earliest printed account of Newton's method of fluxis But the

278
00:19:16.000 --> 00:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>question whether the general idea of the calculus expressed in

279
00:19:21.000 --> 00:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that notation was obtained by Libyaneths from Newton, or whether

280
00:19:24.720 --> 00:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it was invented independently, gave rise to a long and

281
00:19:28.559 --> 00:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>bitter controversy. The leading facts are given in the next chapter.

282
00:19:34.720 --> 00:19:38.279
<v Speaker 1>The question is one of considerable difficulty, But I will

283
00:19:38.319 --> 00:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>hear only say that from what I have read of

284
00:19:40.519 --> 00:19:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the voluminous literature on the question, I think on the

285
00:19:43.920 --> 00:19:46.640
<v Speaker 1>whole it points to the fact that Lebanets obtained the

286
00:19:46.680 --> 00:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>idea of the differential calculus from a manuscript of Newton's

287
00:19:51.000 --> 00:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>which he saw in sixteen seventy five. I believe, however,

288
00:19:55.759 --> 00:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that the prevalent opinion is that the inventions were independent.

289
00:20:02.240 --> 00:20:05.799
<v Speaker 1>The remaining events of Newton's life require little or no comment.

290
00:20:06.720 --> 00:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>In seventeen o five he was knighted. From this time onward,

291
00:20:11.079 --> 00:20:14.640
<v Speaker 1>he devoted much of his leisure to theology, and wrote

292
00:20:14.880 --> 00:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>at great length on the prophecies and predictions, subjects which

293
00:20:19.160 --> 00:20:23.799
<v Speaker 1>had always been of interest to him. His Universal arithmetic

294
00:20:23.960 --> 00:20:27.759
<v Speaker 1>was published by Wiston in seventeen o seven, and his

295
00:20:27.960 --> 00:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Analysis by Infinite Series in seventeen eleven, but Newton had

296
00:20:32.680 --> 00:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with the preparation of either these or

297
00:20:35.680 --> 00:20:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the press. His evidence before the House of Commons in

298
00:20:39.920 --> 00:20:44.599
<v Speaker 1>seventeen fourteen on the determination of longitude at sea marks

299
00:20:44.640 --> 00:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>an important epoch in the history of navigation. The dispute

300
00:20:49.359 --> 00:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>with Leibnitz as to whether he had derived the ideas

301
00:20:52.759 --> 00:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of the differential calculus from Newton or invented it independently,

302
00:20:57.359 --> 00:21:02.119
<v Speaker 1>originated about seventeen o eight and occupied much of Newton's time,

303
00:21:02.319 --> 00:21:06.319
<v Speaker 1>especially between the years seventeen o nine and seventeen sixteen.

304
00:21:07.759 --> 00:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>In seventeen o nine, Newton was persuaded to allow Cotes

305
00:21:11.759 --> 00:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to prepare the long talked of second edition of the Principia.

306
00:21:16.799 --> 00:21:21.319
<v Speaker 1>It was issued in March of seventeen thirteen. A third

307
00:21:21.480 --> 00:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>edition was published in seventeen twenty six, under the direction

308
00:21:25.119 --> 00:21:29.799
<v Speaker 1>of Henry Pemberton. In seventeen twenty five, Newton's health began

309
00:21:29.920 --> 00:21:34.079
<v Speaker 1>to fail. He died on March twentieth, seventeen twenty seven,

310
00:21:34.599 --> 00:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and eight days later was buried with great state in

311
00:21:37.559 --> 00:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Westminster Abbey. His chief works, taking them in their order

312
00:21:43.039 --> 00:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of publication, are the Principia published in sixteen eighty seven,

313
00:21:48.000 --> 00:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>The Optics with Appendices on cubic curves, the Quadrature and

314
00:21:53.000 --> 00:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Rectification of Curves by use of the Infinite Series, and

315
00:21:57.359 --> 00:22:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the Method of Fluxions published in seventeen four, and the

316
00:22:02.000 --> 00:22:06.519
<v Speaker 1>Universal Arithmetic published in seventeen o seven. The Analysis per

317
00:22:06.640 --> 00:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>series Fluxions et cetera published in seventeen eleven, Leccioni's Optique

318
00:22:12.440 --> 00:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>published in seventeen twenty nine, Method of Fluxions et cetera

319
00:22:17.160 --> 00:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I E. Newton's Manuscript on Fluxions, translated by J. Colson

320
00:22:21.440 --> 00:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and published in seventeen thirty six, and the methodis differentialis

321
00:22:26.920 --> 00:22:33.319
<v Speaker 1>also published in seventeen thirty six. In appearance, Newton was short, and,

322
00:22:33.400 --> 00:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>towards the close of his life, rather stout, but well set,

323
00:22:37.559 --> 00:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>with a square lower jaw, brown eyes and a very

324
00:22:41.240 --> 00:22:45.559
<v Speaker 1>broad forehead and a rather sharp features. His hair turned

325
00:22:45.599 --> 00:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>gray before he was thirty, and remained thick and white

326
00:22:49.480 --> 00:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and silver till his death. As to his manners, he

327
00:22:53.279 --> 00:22:58.319
<v Speaker 1>dressed slovenly, was rather languid, and was often so absorbed

328
00:22:58.359 --> 00:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in his own thoughts as to be any but a

329
00:23:00.519 --> 00:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>lively companion. Many anecdotes of his extreme absence of mind

330
00:23:05.880 --> 00:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>when engaged in any investigation have been preserved. Thus Once,

331
00:23:10.839 --> 00:23:13.599
<v Speaker 1>when riding home from Granthem, he dismounted to lead his

332
00:23:13.720 --> 00:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>horse up a steep hill. When he turned at the

333
00:23:16.359 --> 00:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>top to remount, he found that he had the bridle

334
00:23:18.960 --> 00:23:22.079
<v Speaker 1>in his hand, while his horse had slipped it and

335
00:23:22.200 --> 00:23:26.839
<v Speaker 1>gone away again. On the few occasions when he sacrifices

336
00:23:27.039 --> 00:23:29.880
<v Speaker 1>time to entertain his friends, if he left him to

337
00:23:29.920 --> 00:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>get more wine or for any similar reason, he would

338
00:23:33.240 --> 00:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>as often as not be found after the lapse of

339
00:23:36.000 --> 00:23:39.319
<v Speaker 1>some time working out a problem. Oblivious alike of his

340
00:23:39.519 --> 00:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>expectant guests and of his errand, he took no exercise,

341
00:23:44.119 --> 00:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>indulged in no amusements, and worked incessantly, often spending eighteen

342
00:23:49.079 --> 00:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>or nineteen hours out of the twenty four in writing.

343
00:23:54.119 --> 00:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>In character, he was religious and conscientious, with an exceptionally

344
00:23:58.759 --> 00:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>high standard of morales, having, as Bishop BRUNEI said, the

345
00:24:03.240 --> 00:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>whitest soul he ever knew. Newton was always perfectly straightforward

346
00:24:08.400 --> 00:24:12.839
<v Speaker 1>and honest, but in his controversies with Leibanez's Hook and others,

347
00:24:13.279 --> 00:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>though scrupulously just, he was not generous, and it would

348
00:24:17.519 --> 00:24:20.599
<v Speaker 1>seem that he had frequently took offense at a chance

349
00:24:20.640 --> 00:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of expression when none was intended. He modestly attributed his

350
00:24:26.079 --> 00:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>discoveries largely to the admirable work done by his predecessors,

351
00:24:30.559 --> 00:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and once explained that if he had seen farther than

352
00:24:33.720 --> 00:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>other men, it was only because he stood on the

353
00:24:37.000 --> 00:24:41.079
<v Speaker 1>shoulders of giants. He summed up his own estimate of

354
00:24:41.119 --> 00:24:44.039
<v Speaker 1>his work in the sentence, I do not know what

355
00:24:44.200 --> 00:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I may appear to the world, but to myself I

356
00:24:47.599 --> 00:24:50.519
<v Speaker 1>seemed to have been only like a boy playing on

357
00:24:50.599 --> 00:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the sea shore and diverting myself in now and then

358
00:24:53.880 --> 00:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary,

359
00:24:58.079 --> 00:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me.

360
00:25:03.240 --> 00:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>He was morbidly sensitive to being involved in any discussions.

361
00:25:07.640 --> 00:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe that, with the exception of his papers on optics,

362
00:25:11.440 --> 00:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>every one of his works was published only under pressure

363
00:25:14.559 --> 00:25:18.759
<v Speaker 1>from his friends and against his own wishes. There are

364
00:25:18.839 --> 00:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>several instances of his communicating papers and results on condition

365
00:25:23.200 --> 00:25:27.039
<v Speaker 1>that his name should not be published. Thus, when in

366
00:25:27.160 --> 00:25:31.920
<v Speaker 1>sixteen sixty nine he had, at Collier's requests, solved some

367
00:25:32.079 --> 00:25:36.319
<v Speaker 1>problems on the harmonic series and on annuities which had

368
00:25:36.400 --> 00:25:41.759
<v Speaker 1>previously baffled investigation, he only gave permission that his results

369
00:25:41.759 --> 00:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>should be published. So it be as he says, without

370
00:25:45.519 --> 00:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>my name to it. For I see not what there

371
00:25:48.359 --> 00:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is desirable in public esteem. Were I able to acquire

372
00:25:52.440 --> 00:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and maintain it, it would perhaps increase my acquaintance the

373
00:25:57.000 --> 00:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>thing which I chiefly studied, to decline in intellect. He

374
00:26:01.440 --> 00:26:06.319
<v Speaker 1>has never been surpassed, and probably never been equalled. Of this.

375
00:26:06.640 --> 00:26:10.559
<v Speaker 1>His extant works are the only proper test. Perhaps the

376
00:26:10.599 --> 00:26:14.559
<v Speaker 1>most wonderful single illustration of his powers was the composition

377
00:26:15.200 --> 00:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in seven months of the first book of the Principia.

378
00:26:20.279 --> 00:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>As specific illustrations of his ability, I may mention his

379
00:26:24.279 --> 00:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>solutions of the problems of Pappus, of John Bernoulli's challenge,

380
00:26:29.400 --> 00:26:33.599
<v Speaker 1>and of the question of orthogonal trajectories. The problem of

381
00:26:33.680 --> 00:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Pappus is to find the locus of a point such

382
00:26:37.240 --> 00:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>that the rectangle under its distances from two different straight

383
00:26:41.160 --> 00:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>lines shall be in a given ratio to the rectangle

384
00:26:44.400 --> 00:26:48.839
<v Speaker 1>under its distances from two other given straight lines. Many

385
00:26:48.920 --> 00:26:52.599
<v Speaker 1>geometricians from the time of Apollonius had tried to find

386
00:26:52.599 --> 00:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a geometrical solution and had failed. But what had proved

387
00:26:56.920 --> 00:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>insuperabowl to his predecessors seemed to have presented life little

388
00:27:00.359 --> 00:27:05.640
<v Speaker 1>difficulty to Newton, who gave an elegant demonstration as that

389
00:27:05.680 --> 00:27:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the locust was a conic geometry, said Lagrange was when

390
00:27:11.880 --> 00:27:15.079
<v Speaker 1>recommending the study of analysis to his pupils. Is a

391
00:27:15.160 --> 00:27:19.880
<v Speaker 1>strong bow, but it is one which only a Newton

392
00:27:19.960 --> 00:27:25.039
<v Speaker 1>could fully utilize. As another example, I may mention that

393
00:27:25.119 --> 00:27:29.799
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen ninety six John Bernoulli challenged mathematicians one to

394
00:27:29.920 --> 00:27:34.519
<v Speaker 1>determine the brachistochrone, and two to find a curve such

395
00:27:34.559 --> 00:27:37.039
<v Speaker 1>that if any line drawn from a fixed point O

396
00:27:37.920 --> 00:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>cut it in P and Q, then O P to

397
00:27:41.000 --> 00:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the power n plus q o q to the power

398
00:27:44.359 --> 00:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>n would be a constant leiben It solved the first

399
00:27:47.480 --> 00:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of these questions after an interval of rather more than

400
00:27:50.720 --> 00:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>six months, and then suggested that they should be sent

401
00:27:53.680 --> 00:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>as a challenge to Newton and others. Newton received the

402
00:27:57.200 --> 00:28:01.839
<v Speaker 1>problems on January twenty ninth, seen ninety seven, and the

403
00:28:01.880 --> 00:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>next day gave the complete solutions of both, at the

404
00:28:04.680 --> 00:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>same time generalizing the second question. An almost exactly similar

405
00:28:09.799 --> 00:28:13.559
<v Speaker 1>case occurred in seventeen sixteen, when Newton was asked to

406
00:28:13.559 --> 00:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>find the orthogonal trajectory of a family of curves. In

407
00:28:17.599 --> 00:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>five hours, Newton solved the problem in the form in

408
00:28:20.559 --> 00:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>which it was propounded to him, and laid down in

409
00:28:23.759 --> 00:28:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the principles for finding trajectories. It is almost impossible to

410
00:28:28.920 --> 00:28:33.519
<v Speaker 1>describe the effect of Newton's writings without being suspected of exaggeration.

411
00:28:34.480 --> 00:28:37.759
<v Speaker 1>But if the state of mathematical knowledge in sixteen sixty

412
00:28:37.839 --> 00:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>nine or at the death of pascalar fermat be compared

413
00:28:41.480 --> 00:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>with what was known in sixteen eighty seven, it will

414
00:28:44.480 --> 00:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>be see how immense was the advance. In fact, we

415
00:28:48.079 --> 00:28:51.039
<v Speaker 1>may say that it took mathematicians half a century or

416
00:28:51.119 --> 00:28:54.599
<v Speaker 1>more before they were able to assimilate the work with

417
00:28:54.920 --> 00:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>which Newton produced in those twenty years sure geometry. Newton

418
00:29:01.759 --> 00:29:05.279
<v Speaker 1>did not establish any new methods, but no modern writer

419
00:29:05.400 --> 00:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>has shewn the same power in using those of classical geometry.

420
00:29:09.920 --> 00:29:13.559
<v Speaker 1>In algebra and the theory of equations, he introduced a

421
00:29:13.599 --> 00:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>system of literal indices, established the binomial theorem, created no

422
00:29:19.599 --> 00:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>inconsiderable part of the theory of equations. One rule which

423
00:29:24.200 --> 00:29:28.119
<v Speaker 1>he enunciated in this subject remained till a few years ago,

424
00:29:28.559 --> 00:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>an unsolved riddle which had overtaxed the resources of succeeding mathematicians.

425
00:29:34.960 --> 00:29:39.559
<v Speaker 1>In analytical geometry, he introduced the modern classification of curves

426
00:29:39.599 --> 00:29:44.599
<v Speaker 1>into the algebraical and transcendental, and established many of the

427
00:29:44.640 --> 00:29:50.559
<v Speaker 1>fundamental properties of asymptotes, multiple points, and isolated loops, illustrated

428
00:29:50.640 --> 00:29:55.519
<v Speaker 1>by a discussion of cubic curves. The fluxitional or infinitesimal

429
00:29:55.559 --> 00:29:59.119
<v Speaker 1>calculus was invented by Newton in or before the year

430
00:29:59.160 --> 00:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>sixteen sixty seve and circulated in manuscripts amongst his friends

431
00:30:05.160 --> 00:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in and after the year sixteen sixty nine, though no

432
00:30:08.279 --> 00:30:12.799
<v Speaker 1>account of the method was printed till sixteen ninety three.

433
00:30:12.880 --> 00:30:15.839
<v Speaker 1>The fact that the results are nowadays expressed in a

434
00:30:15.839 --> 00:30:20.319
<v Speaker 1>different notation has led to Newton's investigations on this subject

435
00:30:20.400 --> 00:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>being somewhat overlooked. Newton further was the first to place

436
00:30:26.000 --> 00:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>dynamics on a satisfactory basis, and from dynamics he deduced

437
00:30:30.680 --> 00:30:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the theory of statics. This was in the introduction to

438
00:30:35.200 --> 00:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the Principia, published in sixteen eighty seven. The theory of attractions,

439
00:30:40.680 --> 00:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the application of the principles of mechanics to the solar system,

440
00:30:45.079 --> 00:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the creation of physical astronomy, and the establishment of the

441
00:30:49.279 --> 00:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>law of universal gravitation are wholly due to him, and

442
00:30:53.240 --> 00:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>were first published in the same work. The particular questions

443
00:30:57.680 --> 00:31:00.279
<v Speaker 1>connected with the motion of the Earth and the Moon

444
00:31:00.400 --> 00:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>were worked out as fully as was then possible. The

445
00:31:05.880 --> 00:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>theory of hydrodynamics was created in the second book of

446
00:31:09.680 --> 00:31:14.599
<v Speaker 1>the Principia, and he added considerably to the theory of hydrostatics,

447
00:31:14.640 --> 00:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>which may be said to have been first discussed by Pascal.

448
00:31:19.119 --> 00:31:22.359
<v Speaker 1>The theory of the propagation of waves, and in particular

449
00:31:22.480 --> 00:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the application to determine the velocity of sound, is due

450
00:31:26.559 --> 00:31:30.039
<v Speaker 1>to Newton, and was published in sixteen eighty seven. In

451
00:31:30.119 --> 00:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>geometrical optics, he explained, amongst other things, the decomposition of

452
00:31:35.039 --> 00:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>light and the theory of the rainbow. He invented the

453
00:31:38.759 --> 00:31:44.119
<v Speaker 1>reflecting telescope known by his name, and the sextant. In

454
00:31:44.200 --> 00:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>physical optics he suggested and elaborated the emission theory of light.

455
00:31:50.319 --> 00:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>The above list does not exhaust the subjects he investigated,

456
00:31:54.079 --> 00:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>but it will serve to illustrate how marked was his

457
00:31:57.160 --> 00:32:01.359
<v Speaker 1>influence on the history of mathematics, on his writings, and

458
00:32:01.400 --> 00:32:04.559
<v Speaker 1>on their effects. It will be enough to quote the

459
00:32:04.640 --> 00:32:08.519
<v Speaker 1>remarks of two or three of those who were subsequently

460
00:32:08.599 --> 00:32:13.359
<v Speaker 1>concerned with the subject matter of the Principia. Lagrange described

461
00:32:13.359 --> 00:32:16.519
<v Speaker 1>the Principia as the greatest production of the human mind,

462
00:32:17.119 --> 00:32:20.359
<v Speaker 1>and said that he felt dazed that such an illustration

463
00:32:20.480 --> 00:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of what a man's intellect might be capable. In describing

464
00:32:24.519 --> 00:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the effect of his own writings and those of la Place,

465
00:32:28.119 --> 00:32:31.279
<v Speaker 1>it was a favorite remark of his that Newton was

466
00:32:31.359 --> 00:32:34.519
<v Speaker 1>not only the greatest genius that had ever existed, but

467
00:32:34.599 --> 00:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>he was also the most fortunate. For as there is

468
00:32:38.000 --> 00:32:41.559
<v Speaker 1>but one universe, it can happen but to one man

469
00:32:41.640 --> 00:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in the world's history to be the interpreter of its laws. Laplace,

470
00:32:47.359 --> 00:32:51.319
<v Speaker 1>who is in general very sparing of his praise, makes

471
00:32:51.359 --> 00:32:54.839
<v Speaker 1>of Newton the one exception and the words in which

472
00:32:54.839 --> 00:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>he enumerates the causes which will always assure the Principias

473
00:32:59.799 --> 00:33:03.079
<v Speaker 1>of pre eminence above all other productions of the human

474
00:33:03.160 --> 00:33:08.839
<v Speaker 1>intellect have often been quoted. Not less remarkable is the

475
00:33:08.920 --> 00:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>homage rendered by Gauss. For other great mathematicians or philosophers,

476
00:33:14.640 --> 00:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>he used the epithets magnus or clarus or clarissimus. For

477
00:33:20.599 --> 00:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Newton alone, he kept the prefix summus. Finally, Billott, who

478
00:33:27.000 --> 00:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>had made a special study of Newton's works, sums up

479
00:33:30.039 --> 00:33:35.599
<v Speaker 1>his remarks by saying, come geometrie e comic experimental ternuton

480
00:33:36.039 --> 00:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>sanzegale paleri de sidu genre de genipe eller plo ere

481
00:33:43.119 --> 00:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>sons exemple end of section twenty six. Recording by Paul King, Oakville, Ontario,

482
00:33:52.279 --> 00:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>p J K dot scripts dot m I T dot

483
00:33:54.720 --> 00:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>e ed U forward slash p K J
