WEBVTT

1
00:00:15.480 --> 00:00:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Hi, Hello and welcome. It is September twenty fifth, twenty

2
00:00:18.760 --> 00:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. It's Thursday night, which means it's time for

3
00:00:21.559 --> 00:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Night in America. Welcome to the latest episode

4
00:00:24.359 --> 00:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of the FFPC Insider Access Show. My name is Eric Balkman.

5
00:00:28.239 --> 00:00:30.719
<v Speaker 1>You can connect with me on x at Eric Balkman.

6
00:00:30.960 --> 00:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>You know me from the road of his High Stakes Lowdown,

7
00:00:32.880 --> 00:00:35.679
<v Speaker 1>the High Stakes Fantasy Football Hour, and of course the FFPC.

8
00:00:36.159 --> 00:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>You know this guy from Established the Run. No stranger

9
00:00:39.399 --> 00:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously to this show as well, as he's been on

10
00:00:42.039 --> 00:00:45.799
<v Speaker 1>it multiple times. He's gonna wow us again for the

11
00:00:45.920 --> 00:00:49.119
<v Speaker 1>umpteenth consecutive time. Want to welcome on the Man, the myth,

12
00:00:49.159 --> 00:00:52.079
<v Speaker 1>the legend, the guy who's in charge of NFL fantasy

13
00:00:52.200 --> 00:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>betting and projections over at Established the Run. He is

14
00:00:56.000 --> 00:00:59.399
<v Speaker 1>at Jack Miller zero two on X Jack. Welcome back

15
00:00:59.439 --> 00:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to the show.

16
00:01:00.679 --> 00:01:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thanks for having me on. I hope I can

17
00:01:03.000 --> 00:01:04.760
<v Speaker 2>live up to that intro you just gave me. But

18
00:01:05.760 --> 00:01:08.680
<v Speaker 2>it's crazy. We're already on the week four. It feels

19
00:01:08.719 --> 00:01:11.359
<v Speaker 2>like it's flying by. So excited to be on here again.

20
00:01:12.040 --> 00:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I was listening to you and Adam Levitan and oh

21
00:01:16.680 --> 00:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>God helped me out who else was on that show.

22
00:01:18.799 --> 00:01:24.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm the latest established around the podcast, and I think exactly, yes,

23
00:01:24.159 --> 00:01:28.599
<v Speaker 1>thank you. And you said the same thing about you know,

24
00:01:28.599 --> 00:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it's already on the week four, and it got me thinking,

25
00:01:30.599 --> 00:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, God, you know, we spend all off season

26
00:01:33.439 --> 00:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>just pining and waiting, and finally at the season's here,

27
00:01:36.920 --> 00:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and and if it feels like it just started and

28
00:01:38.760 --> 00:01:42.359
<v Speaker 1>we're already a month in. It's the longest off season

29
00:01:42.439 --> 00:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>in professional sports, which I guess could be a good

30
00:01:44.799 --> 00:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>thing for the NFL, but it's also a bad thing too.

31
00:01:47.879 --> 00:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And and you think about how your takes and how

32
00:01:51.680 --> 00:01:55.599
<v Speaker 1>your stances and how your flag plants have gone, you know,

33
00:01:55.680 --> 00:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>over the course of drafting season, and how they can shift,

34
00:01:59.319 --> 00:02:01.159
<v Speaker 1>you know. I I think the thing that we need

35
00:02:01.200 --> 00:02:05.239
<v Speaker 1>to understand here in in being fantasy analysts, not that

36
00:02:05.280 --> 00:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm one, I'm just I just I'm just a host.

37
00:02:08.120 --> 00:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>But the thing that we need to understand is we

38
00:02:12.560 --> 00:02:14.719
<v Speaker 1>could spend all summer researching and doing all this stuff,

39
00:02:14.759 --> 00:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>but when we get this fresh information, and now four

40
00:02:17.400 --> 00:02:20.599
<v Speaker 1>weeks of fresh information, Jack, I'm sure you've pivoted and

41
00:02:20.639 --> 00:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>you've moved off of some of your takes in July

42
00:02:22.960 --> 00:02:25.039
<v Speaker 1>and August because you have to, because it's a smart

43
00:02:25.039 --> 00:02:25.599
<v Speaker 1>thing to do.

44
00:02:26.439 --> 00:02:26.840
<v Speaker 3>For sure.

45
00:02:26.919 --> 00:02:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think we get all this information, or we

46
00:02:29.360 --> 00:02:33.280
<v Speaker 2>think we get all this information throughout June, July, August,

47
00:02:33.360 --> 00:02:35.879
<v Speaker 2>preseason training camp, all that, but you don't. The cards

48
00:02:35.879 --> 00:02:37.800
<v Speaker 2>aren't really on the table until week one, and that's

49
00:02:37.800 --> 00:02:40.479
<v Speaker 2>when we see what coaches and teams actually want to

50
00:02:40.520 --> 00:02:42.719
<v Speaker 2>do and how they want to use and deploy their players.

51
00:02:44.000 --> 00:02:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like Travis Hunter is probably the biggest example.

52
00:02:46.400 --> 00:02:49.400
<v Speaker 2>I feel like all offseason we heard about how he's

53
00:02:49.400 --> 00:02:51.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna play eighty percent of snaps on offense, he's barely

54
00:02:51.560 --> 00:02:53.479
<v Speaker 2>gonna play defense, And here we are three weeks in

55
00:02:53.520 --> 00:02:57.319
<v Speaker 2>and he's playing more defensively than offensively. So I don't

56
00:02:57.319 --> 00:02:59.199
<v Speaker 2>I think you don't want to overreact to stuff like that,

57
00:02:59.599 --> 00:03:01.680
<v Speaker 2>but I do think that it's it's important to adjust

58
00:03:01.759 --> 00:03:03.240
<v Speaker 2>your prize as you get into information.

59
00:03:04.159 --> 00:03:08.719
<v Speaker 1>The Hunter thing is it stinks because well, it doesn't

60
00:03:08.719 --> 00:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>stink because Jack, This wouldn't surprise me at all. In fact,

61
00:03:11.400 --> 00:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it might still be the most likely outcome

62
00:03:13.439 --> 00:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>with Hunter is you know, I he ends up being

63
00:03:18.960 --> 00:03:21.759
<v Speaker 1>like a typical rookie receiver where he doesn't offer a

64
00:03:21.759 --> 00:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>whole lot in September and October. But once we get

65
00:03:24.120 --> 00:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>into the you know, November Thanksgiving fantasy playoffs, all of

66
00:03:27.439 --> 00:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, this you know, things could just click for

67
00:03:29.439 --> 00:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this guy. And he's got this uber athleticism and all

68
00:03:32.360 --> 00:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden he's looking like a potential league winner,

69
00:03:35.360 --> 00:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>which is why I'm not selling on him in redraft

70
00:03:37.800 --> 00:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>leagues right now. I'm holding on to him because I

71
00:03:39.520 --> 00:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>think the best is yet well, the best better be

72
00:03:41.599 --> 00:03:43.639
<v Speaker 1>yet to come with Hunter, because I haven't seen a

73
00:03:43.639 --> 00:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of it, but that's my stance on it.

74
00:03:46.120 --> 00:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>But right now, you're right. I mean, it's just, you know,

75
00:03:48.800 --> 00:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>as much as we were excited to see Travis Hunter

76
00:03:51.360 --> 00:03:54.039
<v Speaker 1>and and and you know catching balls from Lawrence sort

77
00:03:54.039 --> 00:03:56.919
<v Speaker 1>of that whole Jacksonville passing offense. God, we could do

78
00:03:56.960 --> 00:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>two hours on that. With with what a train wreck

79
00:03:59.039 --> 00:04:01.319
<v Speaker 1>that's been so far this year. We will get into

80
00:04:01.400 --> 00:04:04.039
<v Speaker 1>part of it later on on the show tonight. We

81
00:04:04.120 --> 00:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>will go around the NFL. In the first segment tonight,

82
00:04:06.560 --> 00:04:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Jack and I will we'll be talking about the Kansas

83
00:04:08.639 --> 00:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>City pass catchers, especially with the news on Xavier Worthy.

84
00:04:12.479 --> 00:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Some injuries that we need to get into. Ceedee Lamb replacements. Obviously,

85
00:04:15.960 --> 00:04:17.759
<v Speaker 1>we want to figure out what Jack thinks about Amar

86
00:04:17.839 --> 00:04:20.519
<v Speaker 1>and Hampton now that Naji Harris is out for the year,

87
00:04:20.600 --> 00:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and what are we doing with Cam Scataboo with Tyrone

88
00:04:22.800 --> 00:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Tracy expected to miss a few weeks. That's the first

89
00:04:25.279 --> 00:04:28.079
<v Speaker 1>segment Tonight. We'll get into our Thursday night football preview

90
00:04:28.240 --> 00:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks and Cardinals on Prime Video tonight. Zach Charbonae breaking

91
00:04:32.399 --> 00:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>news he is active tonight to maybe no one's surprised,

92
00:04:35.160 --> 00:04:37.639
<v Speaker 1>but how does that affect Kenneth Walker. We'll get into that.

93
00:04:38.439 --> 00:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Trey Benson is he a bellcow? I know Jack has

94
00:04:41.040 --> 00:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>some thoughts on this, and we'll get into that as

95
00:04:43.160 --> 00:04:45.879
<v Speaker 1>well in the second segment. Final segment, we'll do Starters

96
00:04:45.879 --> 00:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>six tonight. A lot of polarizing players here. We'll get

97
00:04:48.160 --> 00:04:52.079
<v Speaker 1>into Isaiah Pacheco, Wandelle Robinson, Dallas Goddard, Gino Smith and

98
00:04:52.120 --> 00:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of course Bo Nicks as well. Want to remind everybody

99
00:04:55.160 --> 00:04:57.639
<v Speaker 1>if you are looking for some weekly action with the FFPC,

100
00:04:57.759 --> 00:05:01.519
<v Speaker 1>the FFPC Week four Weekly Challenge is live. There's no draft,

101
00:05:01.519 --> 00:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no salary cap. You're just picking ten players or

102
00:05:04.399 --> 00:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve players if you want to play with kickers and defenses.

103
00:05:07.519 --> 00:05:09.759
<v Speaker 1>You can win up to twenty five hundred dollars ten

104
00:05:09.879 --> 00:05:13.399
<v Speaker 1>thirty and one hundred team contest right now, y ffpc

105
00:05:13.519 --> 00:05:16.519
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Only one player per team. If you want

106
00:05:16.519 --> 00:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Trey Benson, you can't have Trey McBride. If you want

107
00:05:19.759 --> 00:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Walker, you can't have Zach Charbonay. Not that you

108
00:05:22.279 --> 00:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>want to do that anyway. My FFPC dot com is

109
00:05:24.839 --> 00:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>ready to go for that. Yffpc dot Com shout out

110
00:05:28.040 --> 00:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>to our producer, the man behind the glass to night,

111
00:05:29.879 --> 00:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Sean Engel, pushing all the right buttons. Let's get into

112
00:05:32.439 --> 00:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a jack. The first thing I want to lead off

113
00:05:34.040 --> 00:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>with tonight Jacory krossky Merritt. He missed Wednesday's practice. I

114
00:05:39.079 --> 00:05:41.079
<v Speaker 1>do believe, and have to look this up right now.

115
00:05:41.120 --> 00:05:45.879
<v Speaker 1>I do believe he missed practice again today for the Commanders,

116
00:05:45.879 --> 00:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>which is not great when you consider that this is

117
00:05:48.120 --> 00:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a player that a lot of people were excited about.

118
00:05:50.639 --> 00:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people were planning on flexing him out

119
00:05:53.839 --> 00:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>this week and they can't flex him out if he's inactive.

120
00:05:56.720 --> 00:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to get your thoughts on a guy who

121
00:05:58.839 --> 00:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>is not practiced too games. This are two days this week,

122
00:06:02.560 --> 00:06:06.079
<v Speaker 1>and then if he is inactive against the Falcons this week. Jack,

123
00:06:06.360 --> 00:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you team Jeremy McNichols, Are you team Chris Rodriguez?

124
00:06:10.000 --> 00:06:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Or are you team? Don't start any Commanders running backs

125
00:06:12.959 --> 00:06:13.439
<v Speaker 1>in Week four.

126
00:06:14.720 --> 00:06:18.040
<v Speaker 2>I think if jacm misses I I would prefer not

127
00:06:18.120 --> 00:06:20.040
<v Speaker 2>to start either of them. But if I had to choose,

128
00:06:20.040 --> 00:06:23.279
<v Speaker 2>it would be Chris Rodriguez. I think he'd be a

129
00:06:23.279 --> 00:06:26.560
<v Speaker 2>heavy favorite to inherit most of the rushing work. Jeremy

130
00:06:26.759 --> 00:06:30.199
<v Speaker 2>Jeremy McNichols seems like he's more in the Austin Eckler role.

131
00:06:31.399 --> 00:06:34.680
<v Speaker 2>If Jacorey krossky Merit does play, I mean, it might

132
00:06:34.720 --> 00:06:36.600
<v Speaker 2>be even worse just for all of them, just because

133
00:06:36.639 --> 00:06:39.399
<v Speaker 2>then you have McNichols still in the Eckler pass catching role,

134
00:06:39.800 --> 00:06:42.759
<v Speaker 2>and you've got Chris Rodriguez and JCM splitting the carriers.

135
00:06:42.759 --> 00:06:45.360
<v Speaker 2>We saw last week Chris Rodriguez came after being a

136
00:06:45.439 --> 00:06:47.800
<v Speaker 2>healthy scratch the first two weeks, and he out carried

137
00:06:48.439 --> 00:06:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Bill akrossky Merit eleven to eight, just out of the blue,

138
00:06:52.399 --> 00:06:56.439
<v Speaker 2>after there was hype going into week three about the

139
00:06:56.480 --> 00:07:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Commanders expanding Jacory krossky Merit's roll. Cliff Kingsbury has said

140
00:07:00.600 --> 00:07:02.639
<v Speaker 2>some stuff along the lines if he needs to be

141
00:07:02.680 --> 00:07:04.800
<v Speaker 2>better without the ball. We like what he can do

142
00:07:04.839 --> 00:07:06.439
<v Speaker 2>with the ball in his hands, but the pass pro,

143
00:07:06.759 --> 00:07:09.199
<v Speaker 2>the route running, all the stuff that the rookie running

144
00:07:09.240 --> 00:07:11.279
<v Speaker 2>backs sometimes don't have right off the bat, he needs

145
00:07:11.319 --> 00:07:14.279
<v Speaker 2>to improve. So I think Jacorey Krosky Merritt is a

146
00:07:14.279 --> 00:07:16.199
<v Speaker 2>pretty good example of a rookie we can expect to

147
00:07:16.240 --> 00:07:18.680
<v Speaker 2>grow into a large role throughout the season, but I

148
00:07:18.720 --> 00:07:20.800
<v Speaker 2>think in the short term he's pretty tough to trust

149
00:07:20.839 --> 00:07:23.800
<v Speaker 2>with Washington using a three man backfield.

150
00:07:24.480 --> 00:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think he's the type of player that, you

151
00:07:27.720 --> 00:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>know what I just brought up with with Travis Hunter,

152
00:07:29.839 --> 00:07:32.639
<v Speaker 1>where the game slows down, stuff clicks for him in

153
00:07:32.680 --> 00:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the season, where and I know,

154
00:07:35.199 --> 00:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>like the other thing too is like Hunter if he

155
00:07:39.319 --> 00:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>ends up turning it on. You know, he's fighting with

156
00:07:41.839 --> 00:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>guys like Diami Brown. He's fighting with guys like you know,

157
00:07:44.399 --> 00:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Parker Washington or what have you, a guy that players

158
00:07:48.560 --> 00:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that do not have his talent level Krosskey Merritt. I

159
00:07:51.040 --> 00:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you could make the same case because

160
00:07:52.920 --> 00:07:56.639
<v Speaker 1>he was a seventh round pick with McNichols and Rodriguez,

161
00:07:57.439 --> 00:08:00.639
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember. It might have been unestablished. It might

162
00:08:00.639 --> 00:08:02.279
<v Speaker 1>have been Levitan who actually said this. I could be

163
00:08:02.319 --> 00:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>wrong about If Krossky Merrick can't fight off these guys

164
00:08:06.199 --> 00:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>by like November, then maybe he's just not very good.

165
00:08:10.000 --> 00:08:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's a good way to look at it.

166
00:08:12.160 --> 00:08:14.319
<v Speaker 2>I do think that he's a pretty prime candidate to

167
00:08:14.480 --> 00:08:16.560
<v Speaker 2>expand his role as the season goes on, just because

168
00:08:16.920 --> 00:08:19.600
<v Speaker 2>we already know who Jeremy McNichols is at this stage

169
00:08:19.600 --> 00:08:22.839
<v Speaker 2>of his career. He's he's nothing specially as a fine

170
00:08:23.399 --> 00:08:26.480
<v Speaker 2>pass protector, a fine pass catcher, but he's nothing no

171
00:08:26.519 --> 00:08:29.319
<v Speaker 2>one that should prevent a talented rookie running back from

172
00:08:29.839 --> 00:08:31.959
<v Speaker 2>taking on a larger role. Now, the question is, like

173
00:08:32.000 --> 00:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>you said, is jcm that kind that level of talent

174
00:08:34.519 --> 00:08:37.840
<v Speaker 2>where he can push McNichols to the side. And then

175
00:08:37.840 --> 00:08:39.919
<v Speaker 2>with Chris Rodriguez, I mean we've kind of already seen

176
00:08:39.960 --> 00:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>what Washington thinks of him. They made him a healthy

177
00:08:42.039 --> 00:08:44.600
<v Speaker 2>scratch weeks one and two. It's pretty clear to me

178
00:08:44.679 --> 00:08:46.679
<v Speaker 2>that they don't see him as their long term answer

179
00:08:46.720 --> 00:08:49.519
<v Speaker 2>at running back. But again, it's it's kind of just

180
00:08:49.559 --> 00:08:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the question of is Jacry Kraskimeric good enough? Can he

181
00:08:52.320 --> 00:08:55.320
<v Speaker 2>win the coaches trust? Fast enough to really push those

182
00:08:55.360 --> 00:08:57.559
<v Speaker 2>guys to decide and earn the three down every one

183
00:08:57.639 --> 00:08:59.519
<v Speaker 2>role that I think fantasy managers all want.

184
00:09:00.639 --> 00:09:03.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to move on to Isaiah Likely here, a

185
00:09:03.919 --> 00:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>player that many people in the FFPC drafted late and

186
00:09:09.600 --> 00:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>have rostered since then. I think in non tight end

187
00:09:13.279 --> 00:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>premium leagues, you still might be able to pick this

188
00:09:15.519 --> 00:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>guy up, but maybe not. It's tough to say. He

189
00:09:18.600 --> 00:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>was limited and yesterday's walk through practice for the Ravens

190
00:09:23.440 --> 00:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the foot injury. Obviously, he's still not gotten

191
00:09:26.120 --> 00:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>into a game this season. Limited practice for him prior

192
00:09:29.679 --> 00:09:32.039
<v Speaker 1>to the Lions game on Monday Night Football last week,

193
00:09:32.240 --> 00:09:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and he's limited on the first injury report of the week.

194
00:09:35.440 --> 00:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Here he is I don't know. I hesitate to say

195
00:09:39.440 --> 00:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>this on a Thursday afternoon, Thursday evening. He's probably going

196
00:09:42.879 --> 00:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to play in Week four, but god, I don't know

197
00:09:46.000 --> 00:09:48.759
<v Speaker 1>if he is active. It's going to be interesting for

198
00:09:48.799 --> 00:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>people who have not only Likely Jack, but Mark Andrews

199
00:09:51.759 --> 00:09:54.039
<v Speaker 1>as well, who came back from the dead. In one

200
00:09:54.039 --> 00:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of my local fantasy football show. He was my bust

201
00:09:57.120 --> 00:09:59.159
<v Speaker 1>of the week for Week three and he has his

202
00:09:59.279 --> 00:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>best you know performance since Obama was president. Essentially, it

203
00:10:02.879 --> 00:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>was insane what he did on Monday Night football. And

204
00:10:07.519 --> 00:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at Likely, who's a super talented guy, a

205
00:10:10.279 --> 00:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>player that his own coach said his expectation is for

206
00:10:13.879 --> 00:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Likely to be an All Pro this season, which is

207
00:10:15.639 --> 00:10:17.759
<v Speaker 1>tough to do. Not a Pro bowler and all Pro.

208
00:10:18.919 --> 00:10:21.879
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking at what to do at tight end

209
00:10:21.960 --> 00:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>with the Ravens comes Sunday this week against Kansas City,

210
00:10:26.039 --> 00:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>if Likely is active, would you feel okay about flexing

211
00:10:29.919 --> 00:10:32.919
<v Speaker 1>either of these players? Again, an FFPC tight end premium leagues,

212
00:10:33.039 --> 00:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>would you feel okay about flexing either of these players?

213
00:10:35.720 --> 00:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Or are you really really rolling the dice if you

214
00:10:38.759 --> 00:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>want to insert either one of these guys into your

215
00:10:40.600 --> 00:10:41.799
<v Speaker 1>starting lineup in Week four?

216
00:10:42.559 --> 00:10:44.639
<v Speaker 2>I think it's much more of a dice roll on Likely,

217
00:10:44.679 --> 00:10:48.000
<v Speaker 2>who I still like long term. I liked him a

218
00:10:48.039 --> 00:10:50.159
<v Speaker 2>lot more last week when it looked like Mark Andrews

219
00:10:50.240 --> 00:10:53.840
<v Speaker 2>was kind of dusted on his Week three performance, I

220
00:10:53.919 --> 00:10:54.960
<v Speaker 2>was kind of in a similar boat.

221
00:10:55.000 --> 00:10:56.159
<v Speaker 3>I really was not expecting that.

222
00:10:56.240 --> 00:10:59.200
<v Speaker 2>I thought maybe it was it was basically over for

223
00:10:59.240 --> 00:11:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Andrews and it was going to be Likely's role when

224
00:11:02.039 --> 00:11:05.279
<v Speaker 2>whenever he got back. I do think it's really tough

225
00:11:05.320 --> 00:11:07.759
<v Speaker 2>to start a guy like Likely in his first game

226
00:11:07.799 --> 00:11:10.519
<v Speaker 2>back he missed. He's missed two months at this point.

227
00:11:11.440 --> 00:11:13.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that's too significant of time for you to

228
00:11:13.440 --> 00:11:16.480
<v Speaker 2>immediately thrust them in your starting lineup. Andrews I expect

229
00:11:16.480 --> 00:11:18.159
<v Speaker 2>to be the tight end one this week, even if

230
00:11:18.320 --> 00:11:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Likely is active, and I do think he'll be active.

231
00:11:21.519 --> 00:11:23.759
<v Speaker 2>I kind of thought he'd be active for last week,

232
00:11:24.159 --> 00:11:27.879
<v Speaker 2>to be honest, but I do think long term, I

233
00:11:28.000 --> 00:11:32.240
<v Speaker 2>would prefer like the upside of Likely over someone like Andrews.

234
00:11:32.720 --> 00:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe? I mean, like, how much did you

235
00:11:35.320 --> 00:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>change your mind about Andrews after what you saw on

236
00:11:39.799 --> 00:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Monday night? A little somewhat, not not at all? How

237
00:11:43.399 --> 00:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>do you feel about like, what what is your outlook

238
00:11:45.840 --> 00:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>on Mark? You just said you know you prefer Likely, obviously,

239
00:11:48.519 --> 00:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>but has your outlook changed on the dustiness of Mark

240
00:11:51.279 --> 00:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Andrews after Monday night football?

241
00:11:53.960 --> 00:11:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Honestly it has. I just didn't think he still had

242
00:11:56.600 --> 00:11:59.399
<v Speaker 2>that kind of ceiling left uh in the chamber at

243
00:11:59.399 --> 00:12:02.080
<v Speaker 2>his age, and it is kind of interesting. We saw

244
00:12:02.159 --> 00:12:04.840
<v Speaker 2>him start slow last year too, although that was kind

245
00:12:04.840 --> 00:12:08.159
<v Speaker 2>of more explainable after he had an offseason car crash.

246
00:12:08.440 --> 00:12:11.559
<v Speaker 2>But again, us let's start this offseason or this season,

247
00:12:11.600 --> 00:12:13.039
<v Speaker 2>and then he kind of gets into the groove in

248
00:12:13.080 --> 00:12:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Week three. So it did change my opinion just seeing

249
00:12:17.039 --> 00:12:19.960
<v Speaker 2>him flash that ceiling that we've seen before from Mark Andrews.

250
00:12:20.600 --> 00:12:23.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, we got a little bit of breaking news

251
00:12:23.799 --> 00:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>here regarding a stud wide receiver. I'm gonna get to

252
00:12:27.399 --> 00:12:28.759
<v Speaker 1>that in a second, but I do want to answer

253
00:12:28.799 --> 00:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>some of these questions here. We'll go on YouTube first.

254
00:12:31.519 --> 00:12:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Ander wants to know Jack he's in a six

255
00:12:34.440 --> 00:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>point per touchdown passing league and he's got to decide

256
00:12:38.600 --> 00:12:41.399
<v Speaker 1>between Geno Smith or Kyler Murray this week. Obviously, Kyler

257
00:12:41.480 --> 00:12:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Murray on Thursday Night Football tonight at home against the

258
00:12:44.799 --> 00:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks. Gino Smith at home against the Chicago Bears.

259
00:12:49.840 --> 00:12:53.159
<v Speaker 1>I just I continue to be underwhelmed by Kyler Murray,

260
00:12:53.200 --> 00:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, and we'll talk about the Seattle defense here

261
00:12:55.240 --> 00:12:57.519
<v Speaker 1>coming up, but I think this is a bad matchup

262
00:12:57.519 --> 00:12:59.879
<v Speaker 1>for Murray. Whereas I could see a lot of points

263
00:13:00.159 --> 00:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>scored in that Raiders Bears game. I think I leaned

264
00:13:02.600 --> 00:13:05.919
<v Speaker 1>towards Smith here, and maybe it's recency bias that's affecting me.

265
00:13:05.960 --> 00:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>The way that Smith was bombing the ball down the

266
00:13:07.679 --> 00:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>field to Trey Tucker, but I think he can have

267
00:13:10.440 --> 00:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>successful performance against the Bears on Sunday as well, So

268
00:13:14.200 --> 00:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I lean towards Geno Smith here over Kyler Murray.

269
00:13:17.600 --> 00:13:20.000
<v Speaker 2>I think I lean Kyler with the rushing upside. But

270
00:13:20.080 --> 00:13:22.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to pull up our projections really quick. We

271
00:13:22.240 --> 00:13:24.720
<v Speaker 2>have it very close. We have them zero point two

272
00:13:24.720 --> 00:13:28.759
<v Speaker 2>points apart in our ETR projections, So a very good

273
00:13:28.840 --> 00:13:32.639
<v Speaker 2>question to ask. We do have Kyler slightly ahead, so

274
00:13:32.919 --> 00:13:34.200
<v Speaker 2>kyleen Kyler.

275
00:13:34.200 --> 00:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So Murray slightly ahead there, and we'll see. I just

276
00:13:37.039 --> 00:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll bring this up to not that this isn't just

277
00:13:40.480 --> 00:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>like the end all be all, but I always like

278
00:13:43.360 --> 00:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to look at the totals on these games, and obviously

279
00:13:45.720 --> 00:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the spreads forty three and a half tonight with the

280
00:13:48.120 --> 00:13:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals a one and a half point home underdog, and

281
00:13:50.840 --> 00:13:52.799
<v Speaker 1>then if you go to that Bears Raiders game that

282
00:13:52.879 --> 00:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>is in the four to twenty five window, forty seven

283
00:13:55.279 --> 00:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half with the Raiders one and a half point.

284
00:13:57.039 --> 00:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean it's very close. This is why

285
00:13:59.200 --> 00:14:04.279
<v Speaker 1>he's asking us, because it's a coin flip. Here ETR

286
00:14:04.360 --> 00:14:08.519
<v Speaker 1>is saying go with Kyler Murray, Bulky is saying go

287
00:14:08.519 --> 00:14:10.919
<v Speaker 1>with Gino Smith, So I know which way I would

288
00:14:11.000 --> 00:14:12.679
<v Speaker 1>lean on that, and you probably know which way you

289
00:14:12.679 --> 00:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>should lean on that too. A Manster twenty three yo.

290
00:14:16.159 --> 00:14:20.519
<v Speaker 1>Do I trade K nine for BTJ PPR. My running

291
00:14:20.519 --> 00:14:23.679
<v Speaker 1>backs are McCaffrey, Walker and Trede Benson. My wide receivers

292
00:14:23.720 --> 00:14:26.919
<v Speaker 1>are Justin Jefferson, Davante, Adams, Chris o'loba, and a Mecca

293
00:14:27.000 --> 00:14:31.639
<v Speaker 1>ag Buka. I lean sort of against this. It seems

294
00:14:31.639 --> 00:14:33.519
<v Speaker 1>like your wide receivers are pretty deep right now. You

295
00:14:33.600 --> 00:14:37.039
<v Speaker 1>got four really good ones there, and if you trade Walker,

296
00:14:37.159 --> 00:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you're adding Brian Thomas into that fray, and then you're

297
00:14:40.639 --> 00:14:42.519
<v Speaker 1>down to Christian McCaffrey and trade Benson. I don't know

298
00:14:42.519 --> 00:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>if I want to roll that way. I think you

299
00:14:44.120 --> 00:14:47.399
<v Speaker 1>have good balance right now, So I would keep Walker,

300
00:14:47.519 --> 00:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey and Benson, Keith, Jefferson, Adams, o'labby and a Book

301
00:14:51.240 --> 00:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>at receiver. I would well, I do think Thomas is

302
00:14:54.159 --> 00:14:56.279
<v Speaker 1>a strong by low right now. Jack, I think for

303
00:14:56.360 --> 00:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this situation I would be against this trade.

304
00:14:58.799 --> 00:15:01.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I prefer Brian Thomas in a vacuum, but I

305
00:15:01.600 --> 00:15:04.039
<v Speaker 2>do think with this team it depends a little bit

306
00:15:04.120 --> 00:15:06.159
<v Speaker 2>on how many receivers you can start if you can

307
00:15:06.200 --> 00:15:07.879
<v Speaker 2>start for if this is the one of the like

308
00:15:08.039 --> 00:15:10.320
<v Speaker 2>f FPC two flex where you can start four receivers,

309
00:15:10.639 --> 00:15:12.879
<v Speaker 2>I kind of still lean Brian Thomas Junior to be honest,

310
00:15:14.679 --> 00:15:19.000
<v Speaker 2>but I think with this specific team it is pretty

311
00:15:19.000 --> 00:15:21.240
<v Speaker 2>close because you do have that wide receiver depth as

312
00:15:21.240 --> 00:15:23.960
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned, and you'd be pretty It depends on also

313
00:15:24.000 --> 00:15:26.559
<v Speaker 2>who your current RB four is. If you don't have

314
00:15:26.639 --> 00:15:29.440
<v Speaker 2>a viable current RB four, who would become your third

315
00:15:29.519 --> 00:15:33.120
<v Speaker 2>running back without locker, then that makes it kind of

316
00:15:33.120 --> 00:15:35.080
<v Speaker 2>a tough tougher proposition.

317
00:15:35.159 --> 00:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Two flex two wide receiver format there for a Manster

318
00:15:38.679 --> 00:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. So thank you for that. Hopefully we helped

319
00:15:40.639 --> 00:15:43.159
<v Speaker 1>you out. We'll go on X right now, Kyle Burr,

320
00:15:43.440 --> 00:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Romeo Dobbs or Evan Engrim at the flex. Evan Ingram

321
00:15:47.000 --> 00:15:49.759
<v Speaker 1>did indeed return to practice this week, which is a

322
00:15:49.759 --> 00:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>good thing, as Martha Stewart would say, But I don't

323
00:15:53.240 --> 00:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>know if he's going to have many good things this

324
00:15:55.200 --> 00:15:58.159
<v Speaker 1>week in fantasy. I know it's a really good matchup

325
00:15:58.399 --> 00:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>with the Bengals, but you know, you're looking at the

326
00:16:00.639 --> 00:16:03.799
<v Speaker 1>second straight week of no Jaden Reid against one of

327
00:16:03.799 --> 00:16:07.639
<v Speaker 1>the worst passing defenses in the NFL, even in tight

328
00:16:07.720 --> 00:16:09.399
<v Speaker 1>end premium. I don't know if I could pull the

329
00:16:09.399 --> 00:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>trigger on Ingram over Dobbs if it's non tight end premium.

330
00:16:12.200 --> 00:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Jack Dobbs is an easy call for me here over

331
00:16:15.120 --> 00:16:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Evan Ingram.

332
00:16:16.559 --> 00:16:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's Dobs pretty comfortably too. I mean

333
00:16:18.759 --> 00:16:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Evan Ingram, he's one of these guys where if the

334
00:16:22.360 --> 00:16:25.639
<v Speaker 2>Broncos get in positive game script, Sean Payton prefers to

335
00:16:25.639 --> 00:16:28.960
<v Speaker 2>play Adam Troutman, and the Broncos are seven point favorites

336
00:16:28.960 --> 00:16:31.080
<v Speaker 2>over Jake Browning. So I think this could be a

337
00:16:31.159 --> 00:16:33.519
<v Speaker 2>floor game for Ingram with the with the game script

338
00:16:33.559 --> 00:16:35.240
<v Speaker 2>we're expecting. So I'm going Dobbs here.

339
00:16:36.399 --> 00:16:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Coo on YouTube right now. Just made a trade. This

340
00:16:38.960 --> 00:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting one. He got Jon Robinson. He gave

341
00:16:42.720 --> 00:16:47.039
<v Speaker 1>up Kyron Williams, Davante Adams, and Roma Doonsay, so you

342
00:16:47.159 --> 00:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>got the best player in the trade, but you did

343
00:16:49.360 --> 00:16:51.919
<v Speaker 1>pay the iron price for it. Here he gets all

344
00:16:52.120 --> 00:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm beg your pardon. He gets Brian Thomas Junior back

345
00:16:54.279 --> 00:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. He has Jonathan Taylor, Justin Jefferson, Drake London.

346
00:16:58.559 --> 00:17:00.799
<v Speaker 1>I think we're split, and he's also got Trade Benson.

347
00:17:01.080 --> 00:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>We're we're splitting hairs here a little bit. You can

348
00:17:03.919 --> 00:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>make the case that you're maybe selling high on Romo

349
00:17:08.000 --> 00:17:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Dunzan and perhaps DeVante Adams as well. Kyraen Williams too.

350
00:17:11.759 --> 00:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that with the Blake Korum time share that

351
00:17:15.480 --> 00:17:17.519
<v Speaker 1>they have going on there, which is, you know, splitting

352
00:17:17.519 --> 00:17:19.880
<v Speaker 1>what seventy five twenty five seventy thirty, and that's what

353
00:17:19.920 --> 00:17:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Sean McVay says that he wants it to be at.

354
00:17:23.240 --> 00:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>This could be the last week that you could sell

355
00:17:25.039 --> 00:17:28.039
<v Speaker 1>high on Kyraen Williams. It's tough to say. I don't

356
00:17:28.039 --> 00:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>think you lost the trade. I don't think he necessarily

357
00:17:29.920 --> 00:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>won the trade. It's close. Jack. I don't really have

358
00:17:31.960 --> 00:17:33.839
<v Speaker 1>strong feelings on this. I think I think it's fine,

359
00:17:33.839 --> 00:17:36.599
<v Speaker 1>and usually I give the advantage to the player that

360
00:17:36.680 --> 00:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>gets the best asset in the deal, and in this case,

361
00:17:39.759 --> 00:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I do believe it's John Robinson.

362
00:17:41.839 --> 00:17:42.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

363
00:17:42.319 --> 00:17:44.319
<v Speaker 3>I prefer the Bejon side slightly.

364
00:17:44.720 --> 00:17:46.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's agreedious on either side, but I

365
00:17:47.319 --> 00:17:50.759
<v Speaker 2>prefer getting Bejon. I think Brian Thomas Junior sends it

366
00:17:50.799 --> 00:17:52.440
<v Speaker 2>over the top a little bit. If if you didn't

367
00:17:52.440 --> 00:17:54.960
<v Speaker 2>get back Brian Thomas Junior or got back a much

368
00:17:55.000 --> 00:17:58.839
<v Speaker 2>lesser receiver. I'd like the three pieces, but with I

369
00:17:58.880 --> 00:18:01.960
<v Speaker 2>mean Jon and Ryan and Brian Thomas are both, in

370
00:18:02.000 --> 00:18:04.319
<v Speaker 2>my opinion, pretty high end started, so I like getting

371
00:18:04.319 --> 00:18:05.039
<v Speaker 2>both of them.

372
00:18:05.680 --> 00:18:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Our GQ on YouTube. I need help starting. This is

373
00:18:09.319 --> 00:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a half point PPR format, a flex, two running backs,

374
00:18:12.720 --> 00:18:16.759
<v Speaker 1>three receivers. So you're looking at Saint Brown, Nico Collins,

375
00:18:16.799 --> 00:18:20.519
<v Speaker 1>Roma Dunse, Keenan Allen, and Quentin Johnston. So let's tackle

376
00:18:20.559 --> 00:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that first. We got to bench two of those guys

377
00:18:23.279 --> 00:18:25.839
<v Speaker 1>in good conscience, I can't really bench any of the

378
00:18:25.839 --> 00:18:28.799
<v Speaker 1>first three, so I guess I have to sit Keenan Allen,

379
00:18:28.839 --> 00:18:31.279
<v Speaker 1>I have to sit Quenton Johnston. Is that the way

380
00:18:31.279 --> 00:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you see it, too, Jack.

381
00:18:32.880 --> 00:18:35.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've got a flex here, so we can come

382
00:18:35.039 --> 00:18:37.200
<v Speaker 2>back to Keithan and QJ. But I think for the

383
00:18:37.200 --> 00:18:40.440
<v Speaker 2>three wide receivers, it's got to be Aman, Nico, and Rome.

384
00:18:41.200 --> 00:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>So half point PPR. Let's look at the running backs.

385
00:18:43.400 --> 00:18:45.759
<v Speaker 1>We got to pick two of these for him here tonight,

386
00:18:46.759 --> 00:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Kyron Williams, I still think like this week, you probably

387
00:18:50.000 --> 00:18:52.079
<v Speaker 1>still got to get him in your lineup. And then

388
00:18:52.119 --> 00:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it gets a little messy between Hubbard, Benson, Judkins and Pacheco.

389
00:18:55.920 --> 00:18:58.559
<v Speaker 1>It's close between Hubbard and Benson. I think I leaned

390
00:18:58.599 --> 00:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Benson here as the second running back to go with

391
00:19:01.160 --> 00:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Kien Williams.

392
00:19:02.559 --> 00:19:05.119
<v Speaker 2>A lean Benson and Kiren too. I agree, it's very

393
00:19:05.160 --> 00:19:08.680
<v Speaker 2>close between Benson and Cuba. I really couldn't blame you

394
00:19:08.720 --> 00:19:11.160
<v Speaker 2>if you went the other way, but I slightly lean Benson.

395
00:19:12.240 --> 00:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>For me, the flex comes down to Hubbard and then

396
00:19:15.720 --> 00:19:19.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously one of these chiefs receivers, probably Keenan Allen. For me,

397
00:19:20.119 --> 00:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess my flex is probably Keenan Allen over Johnston

398
00:19:23.559 --> 00:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and Uh and Hubb I beg your pardon, yeah, and Hubbard.

399
00:19:27.319 --> 00:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the flex is probably Keenan Allen for me.

400
00:19:30.400 --> 00:19:33.759
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers get to go to travel to the Giants

401
00:19:33.839 --> 00:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this week, that's who they play, and then Hubbard Cuba.

402
00:19:37.240 --> 00:19:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Hubbard this week is up against Oh god, I just haded.

403
00:19:41.799 --> 00:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Hubbard is playing the Yeah exactly, So I

404
00:19:48.400 --> 00:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>roll with Keenan Allen here as the flex.

405
00:19:51.400 --> 00:19:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's really close between Keenan and Tuba. For me,

406
00:19:54.839 --> 00:19:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm with you. I think I'm going Keenan Allen.

407
00:19:58.279 --> 00:19:59.839
<v Speaker 2>The volume is just so good right now.

408
00:20:00.119 --> 00:20:01.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean this is this is a good problem

409
00:20:01.599 --> 00:20:03.519
<v Speaker 1>to have, and obviously you're gonna you're gonna be happy

410
00:20:03.559 --> 00:20:05.559
<v Speaker 1>you have this depth once the bye week's hit, which

411
00:20:05.559 --> 00:20:07.759
<v Speaker 1>I think they start next week, right, Jack, do you know?

412
00:20:07.839 --> 00:20:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Do you know off the end?

413
00:20:09.160 --> 00:20:12.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't know offhand, but I think it usually starts

414
00:20:12.359 --> 00:20:13.559
<v Speaker 2>Week five, So that's not right.

415
00:20:13.720 --> 00:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I'm looking at it right now. Week five

416
00:20:17.519 --> 00:20:20.319
<v Speaker 1>is when it starts with Atlanta, Chicago, Green Bay, and

417
00:20:20.359 --> 00:20:23.559
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh all on by. So that's next week. We'll we'll

418
00:20:23.559 --> 00:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>tackle Week four this week when everybody's got still a

419
00:20:26.279 --> 00:20:28.319
<v Speaker 1>really good team and you don't have to worry about

420
00:20:28.319 --> 00:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>replacements in that lineup. Permar ninety nine. Our good buddy

421
00:20:32.559 --> 00:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>is uh Is. He needs one from Matthew Golden, Jamison Williams,

422
00:20:38.200 --> 00:20:43.079
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry. He's leaning towards Golden here and and I listen,

423
00:20:43.119 --> 00:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>who am I to say, don't start a Packers receiver

424
00:20:46.400 --> 00:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>against the Dallas Cowboys defense. So I get it. If

425
00:20:50.160 --> 00:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it is tight end premium, I think that you are

426
00:20:53.480 --> 00:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at a situation where it becomes much closer. If

427
00:20:57.000 --> 00:21:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it's non tight end premium. God, you know you throw

428
00:21:00.960 --> 00:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Williams into this too, Jack, This get this gets

429
00:21:03.440 --> 00:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>really Dicey. The Lions are coming off the short the

430
00:21:07.039 --> 00:21:09.599
<v Speaker 1>short week obviously, as they played Monday night football in

431
00:21:09.720 --> 00:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore against the Ravens. Got I think, you know, as

432
00:21:15.759 --> 00:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>much as I love Golden, I think I might like

433
00:21:17.799 --> 00:21:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Jamis and Williams here better. Uh. And then if it's

434
00:21:21.880 --> 00:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>tight end premium, it's Henry non tight end premium, I

435
00:21:24.720 --> 00:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's Williams. I don't know, how are you

436
00:21:26.759 --> 00:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing this? This is this has got me, This has

437
00:21:28.960 --> 00:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>got me twisted a little bit.

438
00:21:30.799 --> 00:21:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I think this is another one that's that's really close.

439
00:21:34.000 --> 00:21:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I think I I think it's Jamo if it's not

440
00:21:36.839 --> 00:21:39.279
<v Speaker 2>tight end premium. If it is tight end premium, I

441
00:21:39.319 --> 00:21:45.680
<v Speaker 2>think it's really close between Jmo and Henry. It's not premium.

442
00:21:45.359 --> 00:21:46.200
<v Speaker 3>I probably go.

443
00:21:46.440 --> 00:21:49.240
<v Speaker 2>I probably go Jamo there if picking one, If picking two,

444
00:21:49.759 --> 00:21:52.440
<v Speaker 2>it's Jamo and Golden. Uh.

445
00:21:52.480 --> 00:21:55.400
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. Hopefully that helps you out, Permart,

446
00:21:55.440 --> 00:21:59.079
<v Speaker 1>and we will be answering more starting said questions throughout

447
00:21:59.079 --> 00:22:01.599
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of segments on the show. Jack Kamiller

448
00:22:01.680 --> 00:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and from established a run joining us tonight on the

449
00:22:05.200 --> 00:22:07.839
<v Speaker 1>show I want on the FFPC Insider Access Show. We

450
00:22:07.920 --> 00:22:11.079
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about the Chiefs receivers, because this is

451
00:22:11.640 --> 00:22:14.519
<v Speaker 1>a little confounding here as we try to figure this

452
00:22:14.599 --> 00:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>out for a four to twenty five game, correct me

453
00:22:17.759 --> 00:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>if I'm wrong. No, for twenty five game between Baltimore

454
00:22:20.359 --> 00:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and Kansas City, and we don't know exactly what's going

455
00:22:24.000 --> 00:22:27.599
<v Speaker 1>on with Xavier Worthy. However, if we read between the lines,

456
00:22:27.640 --> 00:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>if we are reading the tea leaves, we could probably,

457
00:22:30.599 --> 00:22:33.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say safely assume, but I think

458
00:22:33.839 --> 00:22:36.559
<v Speaker 1>we can assume that Worthy is going to be going

459
00:22:36.640 --> 00:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>against Baltimore on Sunday afternoon. Had a shoulder injury caused

460
00:22:41.400 --> 00:22:46.079
<v Speaker 1>by one Travis Kelce in week one. He practiced the

461
00:22:46.160 --> 00:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>following week, but this is actually today was his first

462
00:22:50.160 --> 00:22:55.640
<v Speaker 1>full practice since he injured his shoulder. The concern I

463
00:22:55.680 --> 00:22:57.799
<v Speaker 1>have here is the early reporting that came out on

464
00:22:57.799 --> 00:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>this Jack was that he is to be used as

465
00:23:00.920 --> 00:23:03.759
<v Speaker 1>a decoy. Like you often don't hear reporting like I

466
00:23:03.799 --> 00:23:06.599
<v Speaker 1>think it was Nate Taylor from ESPN saying he's going

467
00:23:06.680 --> 00:23:08.559
<v Speaker 1>to be out there, but he's going to be limited.

468
00:23:08.599 --> 00:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be used as a decoy, which is

469
00:23:10.559 --> 00:23:13.519
<v Speaker 1>kind of a weird thing to say. Sometimes we hear

470
00:23:13.559 --> 00:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that a player is active and he's going to be

471
00:23:15.519 --> 00:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>out there, but we don't hear that he's going to

472
00:23:17.720 --> 00:23:19.599
<v Speaker 1>be used as a decoy until we actually see it

473
00:23:19.640 --> 00:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>with our own eyes. In regards to Xavier Worthy this week,

474
00:23:23.240 --> 00:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>this not only affects him, This affects Travis Kelce, this

475
00:23:27.559 --> 00:23:30.759
<v Speaker 1>affects Hollywood Brown as well. What do you think is

476
00:23:30.799 --> 00:23:35.279
<v Speaker 1>going to happen? And knowing what we know publicly about

477
00:23:35.400 --> 00:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Worthy's shoulder, what is the proper way to handle

478
00:23:39.039 --> 00:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>guys like Kelsey Brown and Worthy in your lineups? With

479
00:23:42.200 --> 00:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a late start on Sunday afternoon?

480
00:23:45.160 --> 00:23:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm hoping we get more information between now and

481
00:23:48.440 --> 00:23:52.599
<v Speaker 2>twelve pm Sunday. Right now, after a full practice, I

482
00:23:52.640 --> 00:23:56.240
<v Speaker 2>think it's fine to plan to start Worthy. We don't

483
00:23:56.279 --> 00:23:59.480
<v Speaker 2>really see a lot of guys fully practice and then

484
00:23:59.559 --> 00:24:03.039
<v Speaker 2>go in to a less than a significantly less than

485
00:24:03.039 --> 00:24:06.319
<v Speaker 2>normal role. And given that Worthy seemed to have some

486
00:24:06.440 --> 00:24:08.759
<v Speaker 2>chance of playing last week, I guess the extra week

487
00:24:09.079 --> 00:24:11.039
<v Speaker 2>and I mean this is a huge game for Kansas City.

488
00:24:11.160 --> 00:24:13.079
<v Speaker 2>I guess that they try to get everything they can

489
00:24:13.160 --> 00:24:16.680
<v Speaker 2>out of him. I mean, Kelsey's been really disappointing from

490
00:24:16.720 --> 00:24:19.359
<v Speaker 2>a basically every perspective you want to look at his

491
00:24:19.440 --> 00:24:21.640
<v Speaker 2>target chairs down. Even though he has less competition than

492
00:24:21.640 --> 00:24:26.880
<v Speaker 2>he had last year, He's doesn't look very productive after

493
00:24:26.880 --> 00:24:28.920
<v Speaker 2>the catch. He doesn't look like he has the same

494
00:24:28.960 --> 00:24:31.680
<v Speaker 2>explosiveness he used to. You still have to start him,

495
00:24:31.680 --> 00:24:34.640
<v Speaker 2>I think, just because he's still a tight end one.

496
00:24:34.720 --> 00:24:39.480
<v Speaker 2>He's still getting respectable albeit not elite volume. But Worthy's

497
00:24:39.480 --> 00:24:43.160
<v Speaker 2>gonna get into what decreased target chair he was already

498
00:24:43.200 --> 00:24:46.160
<v Speaker 2>getting even more. So it's definitely a downgrade soon for

499
00:24:46.279 --> 00:24:49.799
<v Speaker 2>Marquis Brown. I mean, Juju and Taekwon Thornton are both

500
00:24:49.839 --> 00:24:54.039
<v Speaker 2>gonna play too, So I think just adding another significant

501
00:24:54.079 --> 00:24:57.759
<v Speaker 2>piece of the puzzle and Worthy just ticks everyone down

502
00:24:58.799 --> 00:24:59.440
<v Speaker 2>slightly more.

503
00:25:00.440 --> 00:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talk about the bad part about it,

504
00:25:02.279 --> 00:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, not knowing what to do with Worthy Brown, Calcey,

505
00:25:04.920 --> 00:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you bring up the Thornton aspect as well.

506
00:25:07.559 --> 00:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is a good thing for Patrick Mahomes. You know,

507
00:25:10.519 --> 00:25:13.279
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens have been giving up a lot of points

508
00:25:13.279 --> 00:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>this year, and granted they've been playing against some pretty

509
00:25:15.240 --> 00:25:18.880
<v Speaker 1>tough offenses, but this could be another game where Mahomes

510
00:25:19.279 --> 00:25:21.759
<v Speaker 1>actually plays really well, and the fact that you're adding

511
00:25:21.799 --> 00:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>these extra weapons for him, maybe he becomes a better

512
00:25:24.519 --> 00:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>start than Caleb Williams, Drake May, bow Nicks, you know,

513
00:25:27.960 --> 00:25:30.079
<v Speaker 1>players like this, even Jordan Love against the Cowboys. I

514
00:25:30.079 --> 00:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>think there's a conversation to be had with that. But

515
00:25:32.319 --> 00:25:34.839
<v Speaker 1>to me, this is good news for Patrick Mahomes.

516
00:25:34.839 --> 00:25:40.319
<v Speaker 2>Obviously I think so too, but the passing efficiency needs

517
00:25:40.359 --> 00:25:43.440
<v Speaker 2>to take a significant step up, like it's it's looked

518
00:25:43.440 --> 00:25:48.519
<v Speaker 2>really bad for the Chiefs passing offense. Mahomes excluding Week three,

519
00:25:48.559 --> 00:25:50.920
<v Speaker 2>has been really active with his legs, which is huge

520
00:25:50.960 --> 00:25:54.519
<v Speaker 2>for fantasy, But I don't know. I mean, it's been

521
00:25:54.599 --> 00:25:56.519
<v Speaker 2>just so bad that I don't know if Xavier Worthy

522
00:25:56.559 --> 00:25:59.000
<v Speaker 2>can fix it. I think once where the Anracity Raiser back,

523
00:25:59.039 --> 00:26:02.200
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna look a lot better. But I'm still a

524
00:26:02.240 --> 00:26:07.119
<v Speaker 2>little skeptical of Mahomes for Week four because we kind

525
00:26:07.119 --> 00:26:08.440
<v Speaker 2>of saw what it looked like last year in the

526
00:26:08.480 --> 00:26:12.200
<v Speaker 2>regular season with Worthy, and it wasn't the Mahomes were

527
00:26:12.319 --> 00:26:13.920
<v Speaker 2>used to seeing by any means.

528
00:26:14.920 --> 00:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I just you know, Mahomes just turned thirty, I think

529
00:26:18.200 --> 00:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>before last week, and he's got a lot of good

530
00:26:21.119 --> 00:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>football left in him, and I just feel like we're

531
00:26:23.400 --> 00:26:26.839
<v Speaker 1>still witnessing like the end of this first phase of

532
00:26:26.839 --> 00:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>his career. The weapons that he's going to be using.

533
00:26:29.680 --> 00:26:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I just feel if if Kansas City gets back to

534
00:26:32.559 --> 00:26:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl again, it's gonna be with you know,

535
00:26:35.319 --> 00:26:37.599
<v Speaker 1>obviously Worthy is gonna be one of them, but they

536
00:26:37.640 --> 00:26:39.559
<v Speaker 1>need a running back. They need a real running back

537
00:26:39.599 --> 00:26:42.279
<v Speaker 1>back there. They need a real threat at tight end,

538
00:26:42.359 --> 00:26:46.759
<v Speaker 1>which they don't have right now with Kelsey, and I

539
00:26:46.759 --> 00:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna happen. I just I think this year

540
00:26:49.240 --> 00:26:51.039
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a struggle bus for Kansas City

541
00:26:51.079 --> 00:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>week in and week out. It's just gonna be one

542
00:26:53.440 --> 00:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of those things you can just never really count on

543
00:26:55.279 --> 00:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>based on the level of talent, the age of the

544
00:26:57.759 --> 00:27:00.279
<v Speaker 1>talent that they have on the squad right now. These

545
00:27:00.319 --> 00:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>guys are at in their careers. David and Joku. I

546
00:27:03.799 --> 00:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>have not seen what happened in practice today for the Browns,

547
00:27:06.759 --> 00:27:11.839
<v Speaker 1>but he was limited yesterday. He normally is on the

548
00:27:11.880 --> 00:27:14.839
<v Speaker 1>injury report for Cleveland. Is not just twenty twenty five.

549
00:27:15.119 --> 00:27:17.519
<v Speaker 1>It happened in twenty twenty four, twenty twenty three, you know,

550
00:27:17.559 --> 00:27:21.559
<v Speaker 1>going back, and he gets the Lions this week, which

551
00:27:21.559 --> 00:27:24.519
<v Speaker 1>granted their defense. I picked up in a lot of

552
00:27:24.559 --> 00:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>leagues last night.

553
00:27:25.559 --> 00:27:25.759
<v Speaker 3>Jack.

554
00:27:25.920 --> 00:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I think they're a solid streamer obviously against Cleveland, but

555
00:27:29.000 --> 00:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think In Djoko could could do some damage.

556
00:27:32.160 --> 00:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>He had five catches last week, it's the most he's

557
00:27:34.759 --> 00:27:38.640
<v Speaker 1>had all season, and forty yards, which was also the

558
00:27:38.680 --> 00:27:42.640
<v Speaker 1>most he's had all season. Obviously, Harold Fannin is gumming

559
00:27:42.720 --> 00:27:44.599
<v Speaker 1>up the works here a little bit. But if you

560
00:27:44.640 --> 00:27:46.640
<v Speaker 1>look at in Djoku and tight end premium leagues, I

561
00:27:46.640 --> 00:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>think he's a slam dunk start. Whether you're looking at

562
00:27:48.960 --> 00:27:52.319
<v Speaker 1>flex or your tight end non tight end premium leagues,

563
00:27:52.319 --> 00:27:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it gets a little bit dicey. I don't

564
00:27:55.680 --> 00:27:58.440
<v Speaker 1>know if we're seeing a changing of the garden Cleveland

565
00:27:58.519 --> 00:28:01.839
<v Speaker 1>right now, but certainly for fantasy. When I thought about

566
00:28:01.920 --> 00:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Fannin and Inn Djoku and where they would be at

567
00:28:05.119 --> 00:28:08.079
<v Speaker 1>in regards to production at this point of the season,

568
00:28:08.160 --> 00:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>I did not view them as this close together. They're

569
00:28:11.160 --> 00:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>almost coin flips on a week to week basis of

570
00:28:13.720 --> 00:28:16.279
<v Speaker 1>who's going to do better, and I don't really have

571
00:28:16.319 --> 00:28:19.079
<v Speaker 1>a good way of predicting it between in Djoku and Fanin.

572
00:28:19.119 --> 00:28:20.319
<v Speaker 1>How do you view this situation?

573
00:28:21.720 --> 00:28:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the snaps and routes are still good for in

574
00:28:24.359 --> 00:28:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Djoku in terms, he's still running a lot of routes.

575
00:28:26.720 --> 00:28:28.480
<v Speaker 2>The targets are down. I think last year, he was

576
00:28:28.519 --> 00:28:30.960
<v Speaker 2>around a twenty percent target share. This year, through three games,

577
00:28:31.000 --> 00:28:33.960
<v Speaker 2>he's at fourteen percent. Fin is also at fourteen percent,

578
00:28:34.000 --> 00:28:36.440
<v Speaker 2>even though he's playing a little less. It really seems

579
00:28:36.440 --> 00:28:38.839
<v Speaker 2>like the Browns are making a concerted effort to get

580
00:28:38.880 --> 00:28:41.240
<v Speaker 2>him the ball when he is on the field. And

581
00:28:41.279 --> 00:28:43.559
<v Speaker 2>that's pretty bad news for Enjoku. It's it's also bad

582
00:28:43.599 --> 00:28:47.000
<v Speaker 2>news for Jerry Judy and Cedric Tillman, really all all

583
00:28:47.039 --> 00:28:49.839
<v Speaker 2>of the Browns pass cutchers that have such a significant

584
00:28:49.880 --> 00:28:53.200
<v Speaker 2>threat added to the mix. I do still agree with

585
00:28:53.240 --> 00:28:54.920
<v Speaker 2>you that, I mean, this is a game. The Browns

586
00:28:54.920 --> 00:28:56.720
<v Speaker 2>are going to be throwing a ton. They're nine and

587
00:28:56.759 --> 00:28:59.559
<v Speaker 2>a half point underdogs the Lions. We know Joe Flaco

588
00:28:59.640 --> 00:29:02.480
<v Speaker 2>is gonna and in Djoku's still out there enough. He's

589
00:29:02.480 --> 00:29:04.799
<v Speaker 2>still getting enough targets to be a viable play in

590
00:29:04.920 --> 00:29:09.160
<v Speaker 2>tight end premium league leagues. I think in non tight

591
00:29:09.240 --> 00:29:11.960
<v Speaker 2>end premium leagues he's clearly not a flex option. I

592
00:29:11.960 --> 00:29:15.720
<v Speaker 2>think he's a pretty low end starting option. But I

593
00:29:15.759 --> 00:29:17.839
<v Speaker 2>do think that a lot of people probably don't have

594
00:29:18.000 --> 00:29:21.640
<v Speaker 2>much better options in non tight end premium leagues, and

595
00:29:21.720 --> 00:29:23.400
<v Speaker 2>so it's fine to trot him out there. He's not

596
00:29:23.440 --> 00:29:25.960
<v Speaker 2>someone you're going to be super excited to start every week,

597
00:29:25.960 --> 00:29:27.440
<v Speaker 2>but he's a he's a viable option.

598
00:29:28.079 --> 00:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Sean Angel coming through for us as a night our producer,

599
00:29:30.480 --> 00:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>saying that in Djoku did get in a full practice today,

600
00:29:33.680 --> 00:29:36.279
<v Speaker 1>which is good. Coming up on that game against the

601
00:29:36.319 --> 00:29:39.519
<v Speaker 1>Lions this week. That Browns Lions total is at forty

602
00:29:39.559 --> 00:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>four and a half, which is interesting. I thought it'd

603
00:29:41.400 --> 00:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit higher, but maybe they're just not

604
00:29:43.200 --> 00:29:47.039
<v Speaker 1>giving the Cleveland offense enough credit. Ten point favorites are

605
00:29:47.039 --> 00:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the Lions in the Motor City at one pm on Sunday.

606
00:29:51.960 --> 00:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Brock Perty, what a ride it's been so far for

607
00:29:55.480 --> 00:29:59.359
<v Speaker 1>him this season. David Lombardi reporting that John Lynch saying

608
00:29:59.400 --> 00:30:03.359
<v Speaker 1>he looked really good in practice yesterday, and it certainly

609
00:30:03.480 --> 00:30:05.839
<v Speaker 1>seems Jack that we are going to see Brock Purty

610
00:30:05.880 --> 00:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>back on the gridiron this week. Mac Jones reaggravated a

611
00:30:09.799 --> 00:30:12.559
<v Speaker 1>knee injury that he suffered in preseason, So now all

612
00:30:12.559 --> 00:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, Perty is the more healthy quarterback between

613
00:30:15.920 --> 00:30:18.519
<v Speaker 1>the two. This is the Jacksonville Jaguars that he is

614
00:30:18.559 --> 00:30:21.799
<v Speaker 1>going to be throwing against this week. I would imagine

615
00:30:21.799 --> 00:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that you want to keep Perty upright as much as possible.

616
00:30:25.119 --> 00:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Probably no Bosa for the forty nine ers, so maybe

617
00:30:28.480 --> 00:30:30.079
<v Speaker 1>this makes it. I don't want to say a shootout

618
00:30:30.119 --> 00:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>because I think both teams are going to be running

619
00:30:31.680 --> 00:30:34.119
<v Speaker 1>the football a lot. Obviously, the Niners know where their

620
00:30:34.160 --> 00:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>bread is buttered with Christian McCaffrey, and the Jaguars ground

621
00:30:37.240 --> 00:30:40.359
<v Speaker 1>game has been much more successful in moving the football

622
00:30:40.359 --> 00:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>downfield rather than the passing game so far this season.

623
00:30:43.920 --> 00:30:48.039
<v Speaker 1>But brock Perdy certainly a decent matchup for him, even

624
00:30:48.079 --> 00:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>missing the time. Does he slay it in as a

625
00:30:50.680 --> 00:30:52.359
<v Speaker 1>starter for you right away? Do you have any qualms

626
00:30:52.359 --> 00:30:52.759
<v Speaker 1>about it?

627
00:30:53.839 --> 00:30:57.400
<v Speaker 2>I'd be a little cautious with what the rushing workload's

628
00:30:57.400 --> 00:30:59.920
<v Speaker 2>going to look like with the tow injury. I've just

629
00:31:00.039 --> 00:31:02.640
<v Speaker 2>right enough online about this kind of toe injury where

630
00:31:02.640 --> 00:31:05.519
<v Speaker 2>it seems like it could impact him from a rushing standpoint.

631
00:31:05.519 --> 00:31:08.799
<v Speaker 2>He quietly was scrambling a ton last year and so

632
00:31:08.880 --> 00:31:10.480
<v Speaker 2>that was a pretty big part of his game, So

633
00:31:10.839 --> 00:31:13.480
<v Speaker 2>it would be unfortunate for fantasy purposes if that is

634
00:31:13.559 --> 00:31:16.799
<v Speaker 2>dialed back a little bit. I've also seen a lot

635
00:31:16.799 --> 00:31:20.359
<v Speaker 2>of stuff about the Jaguars defense being a potentially bad matchup.

636
00:31:20.799 --> 00:31:22.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm a little less worried about that just because I

637
00:31:22.839 --> 00:31:24.920
<v Speaker 2>want to see the Jaguars do it against someone that's

638
00:31:24.960 --> 00:31:28.680
<v Speaker 2>not the Panthers Jake Browning or this Texans offense that

639
00:31:28.720 --> 00:31:30.519
<v Speaker 2>hasn't really moved the ball against anyone.

640
00:31:31.599 --> 00:31:32.359
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not.

641
00:31:32.319 --> 00:31:35.079
<v Speaker 2>Super worried about the matchup. I would be a little

642
00:31:35.079 --> 00:31:38.640
<v Speaker 2>bit worried about the toe injury limiting his rushing, but

643
00:31:38.680 --> 00:31:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I do think he's still I mean, this is a

644
00:31:40.720 --> 00:31:43.319
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Shanahan offense. They're going to be super efficient. We'll

645
00:31:43.319 --> 00:31:45.920
<v Speaker 2>see if Juwon Jennings plays. I don't think we know

646
00:31:46.119 --> 00:31:50.559
<v Speaker 2>on that yet. But regardless, I think Purty should still

647
00:31:50.559 --> 00:31:52.839
<v Speaker 2>be his usual efficient self. It's just maybe the rushing

648
00:31:52.880 --> 00:31:55.200
<v Speaker 2>isn't quite at the standard we're used to.

649
00:31:55.799 --> 00:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Would you play Kyler Murray over Brock Party then tonight?

650
00:32:00.359 --> 00:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I would, yeah, Jared goff over over over Brock Party.

651
00:32:07.359 --> 00:32:10.839
<v Speaker 3>I think so. But that one's yeah, I think.

652
00:32:10.680 --> 00:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>So, okay. And then the last one here, well, no,

653
00:32:16.000 --> 00:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a dumb one because if jayde Daniels is active,

654
00:32:18.039 --> 00:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you're going to play him. What about Matthew Stafford against

655
00:32:20.720 --> 00:32:22.759
<v Speaker 1>the Colts versus Brock Party.

656
00:32:24.680 --> 00:32:27.240
<v Speaker 3>I think I'd probably lean Party there.

657
00:32:27.400 --> 00:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, I want to go back to twitch

658
00:32:30.000 --> 00:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>here chance f twenty thousand. I think it's twenty thousand

659
00:32:33.160 --> 00:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>if I'm reading that correctly. He wants to know should

660
00:32:35.960 --> 00:32:37.799
<v Speaker 1>he start, and I would say he could be she

661
00:32:37.960 --> 00:32:42.279
<v Speaker 1>as well DeAndre Swift at Las Vegas or his other

662
00:32:42.319 --> 00:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>option or her other option, Chase Brown at Denver. And

663
00:32:46.559 --> 00:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>this was not even a question a month ago. But now,

664
00:32:48.880 --> 00:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>given the quarterback situation in Cincinnati, and given DeAndre Swift

665
00:32:55.039 --> 00:33:01.519
<v Speaker 1>seemingly fending off Roshawn Johnson seemingly offending off uh Kyle

666
00:33:01.599 --> 00:33:05.079
<v Speaker 1>manungai Uh, this is a situation that we have to

667
00:33:05.240 --> 00:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>weigh in on here. I still lean Brown. I'm not

668
00:33:08.519 --> 00:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>there yet. I know there's a lot of people down

669
00:33:10.440 --> 00:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>on Brown after the Burrow injury and after what we

670
00:33:13.000 --> 00:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>saw against Minnesota last week, but I'm still trotting him

671
00:33:15.960 --> 00:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>out there, even in Denver against a pretty tough defense

672
00:33:18.759 --> 00:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>over DeAndre Swift, who's at Las Vegas. Jack.

673
00:33:21.640 --> 00:33:25.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm still team Brown too, especially I mean some

674
00:33:25.759 --> 00:33:28.799
<v Speaker 2>pins banged up. I haven't seen anything yet on whether

675
00:33:28.839 --> 00:33:31.279
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna play. I think he's expected to play, but

676
00:33:31.319 --> 00:33:33.400
<v Speaker 2>if Pieran doesn't play, that would mean Chase Brown also

677
00:33:33.400 --> 00:33:35.480
<v Speaker 2>gets the third down steps. But even if per EN's in,

678
00:33:36.240 --> 00:33:38.039
<v Speaker 2>I think I think you still got Chase Brown. The

679
00:33:38.079 --> 00:33:40.799
<v Speaker 2>volume is just so good. I know, he's been absolutely

680
00:33:40.839 --> 00:33:44.000
<v Speaker 2>horrific from a from an efficiency standpoint, and I mean,

681
00:33:44.000 --> 00:33:46.000
<v Speaker 2>we really can't expect that to get a whole lot

682
00:33:46.000 --> 00:33:48.720
<v Speaker 2>better with Jake Browning at quarterback against this Broncos defense.

683
00:33:48.759 --> 00:33:52.039
<v Speaker 2>But volume is still king in fantasy football, and so

684
00:33:52.079 --> 00:33:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm going Chase Brown Yeah.

685
00:33:54.880 --> 00:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I just I look at do you

686
00:33:58.039 --> 00:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>have any metrics? Did you look this up? I don't

687
00:34:00.480 --> 00:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>have anything. What did Jake Browning do back in twenty

688
00:34:04.240 --> 00:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty three in regards to throwing the running backs? You

689
00:34:06.440 --> 00:34:09.639
<v Speaker 1>recall offhand, I know when Chase was healthy, he was

690
00:34:09.639 --> 00:34:12.599
<v Speaker 1>pumping the ball to Chase. I know when Chase wasn't healthy,

691
00:34:12.639 --> 00:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>he was pumping the ball to Higgins. I really don't

692
00:34:14.960 --> 00:34:17.320
<v Speaker 1>remember what he was doing with running backs, if he

693
00:34:17.400 --> 00:34:19.800
<v Speaker 1>was checking down to them at all, because that's something

694
00:34:19.840 --> 00:34:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that you know, even though Joe Burrow is awesome all

695
00:34:22.800 --> 00:34:26.119
<v Speaker 1>world quarterback, he still got Chase and Chase brown involved

696
00:34:26.199 --> 00:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>in the passing game. And I wonder if that's going

697
00:34:28.000 --> 00:34:31.199
<v Speaker 1>to be the case for Brown with Browning going forward. Here.

698
00:34:31.880 --> 00:34:34.599
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason we like brown so much is

699
00:34:34.679 --> 00:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the pass catching and if he's not getting that with Browning,

700
00:34:37.880 --> 00:34:39.039
<v Speaker 1>then we have to reevaluate.

701
00:34:39.800 --> 00:34:42.559
<v Speaker 2>I think I don't want to be quoted on this

702
00:34:42.599 --> 00:34:44.880
<v Speaker 2>because I could be wrong. I think Browning threw to

703
00:34:44.960 --> 00:34:47.000
<v Speaker 2>running backs a pretty good amount. I know he threw

704
00:34:47.039 --> 00:34:49.559
<v Speaker 2>the tight ends a ton when he started in twenty

705
00:34:49.599 --> 00:34:54.159
<v Speaker 2>twenty three running backs. I think he threw slightly more

706
00:34:54.880 --> 00:34:58.079
<v Speaker 2>than the Bengals were without Jake Browning. But I could

707
00:34:58.159 --> 00:34:59.679
<v Speaker 2>be wrong on that.

708
00:35:00.000 --> 00:35:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious offhand, and that's something that we could

709
00:35:02.360 --> 00:35:05.199
<v Speaker 1>check out later on. But I do think that's worth

710
00:35:05.239 --> 00:35:13.199
<v Speaker 1>revisiting here. Okay, let's go with Joshua Mogard on YouTube

711
00:35:13.280 --> 00:35:15.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. He's got a flex out one of these players,

712
00:35:15.920 --> 00:35:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Ladd McConkie, Chris o'lave, Trey Benson. Olave been very involved

713
00:35:21.320 --> 00:35:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in the passing game with New Orleans, and he's gonna

714
00:35:24.840 --> 00:35:26.280
<v Speaker 1>have to be again this week because I think there's

715
00:35:26.280 --> 00:35:28.599
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a lot of throwing for Spencer Rattler. Bills

716
00:35:28.599 --> 00:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>are like sixteen seventeen point favorites in that game at

717
00:35:31.920 --> 00:35:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Orchard Park. You have Trey Benson obviously tonight, who may

718
00:35:35.960 --> 00:35:39.119
<v Speaker 1>or may not be the bell Coow. Certainly he's gonna

719
00:35:39.119 --> 00:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>get a lot more work in Week four than what

720
00:35:41.039 --> 00:35:44.199
<v Speaker 1>he did in Week three against Seattam. And then Ladd McConkie,

721
00:35:44.199 --> 00:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>who's been the victim of being on a really good

722
00:35:46.480 --> 00:35:50.199
<v Speaker 1>passing team, Herbert and the Chargers probably airing out more

723
00:35:50.239 --> 00:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>than I expected so far this season. Jack. I also

724
00:35:53.000 --> 00:35:56.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't expect Keenan Allen to be this heavily involved, and

725
00:35:56.360 --> 00:35:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Quentin Johnston to be, you know, have this magnet to

726
00:35:59.760 --> 00:36:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the end zone. He's been very, very good so far

727
00:36:02.320 --> 00:36:04.079
<v Speaker 1>this year. So this is this is a tough call.

728
00:36:05.199 --> 00:36:07.840
<v Speaker 1>If you can only play one of these for me,

729
00:36:07.920 --> 00:36:10.679
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'd probably eliminate Alave. And this comes down,

730
00:36:11.239 --> 00:36:14.679
<v Speaker 1>uh to McConkie and Benson. Is the volume for Benson

731
00:36:14.800 --> 00:36:17.079
<v Speaker 1>enough for you to say that you're going to give

732
00:36:17.159 --> 00:36:19.199
<v Speaker 1>him the nod over mconkie? How would you? What would

733
00:36:19.199 --> 00:36:20.599
<v Speaker 1>you tell Joshua Mogard here?

734
00:36:21.599 --> 00:36:24.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, My gut take was lad And then I looked

735
00:36:24.119 --> 00:36:26.280
<v Speaker 2>at our projections and we actually have him last of

736
00:36:26.320 --> 00:36:28.760
<v Speaker 2>the three, which surprised me a little bit. We have

737
00:36:28.840 --> 00:36:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Trey Benson first, so I he would have been second

738
00:36:32.519 --> 00:36:34.800
<v Speaker 2>for me just on gut take, And I think I'll

739
00:36:34.880 --> 00:36:36.920
<v Speaker 2>lean into the numbers here and go with Trey Benson.

740
00:36:38.239 --> 00:36:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Is there something to be said for as Permar brings

741
00:36:41.519 --> 00:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>this up here, when you consider the upside of Jackson Dart,

742
00:36:46.239 --> 00:36:48.519
<v Speaker 1>who was named the starter this week for New York,

743
00:36:48.960 --> 00:36:52.639
<v Speaker 1>getting the throw to theo Johnson Malik Neighbors, you know,

744
00:36:52.719 --> 00:36:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Darius Slayton getting camp Scataboo out of the backfield as well.

745
00:36:57.719 --> 00:37:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Is there something to be said for Star Dart in

746
00:37:02.000 --> 00:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that game against the Chargers over Jayden Daniels, who's hobbled

747
00:37:06.880 --> 00:37:09.159
<v Speaker 1>and who may be in a lower scoring game there.

748
00:37:09.760 --> 00:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>If Daniels is active, is he a slam dunk play

749
00:37:12.440 --> 00:37:15.320
<v Speaker 1>over Dart Or is there a nuanced decision in this

750
00:37:15.400 --> 00:37:18.119
<v Speaker 1>that maybe Dart would be the better play over Daniels,

751
00:37:18.159 --> 00:37:19.800
<v Speaker 1>who's still dealing with a knee injury.

752
00:37:21.079 --> 00:37:23.719
<v Speaker 2>If Jadan Daniels is active, I'm definitely starting him over Dart.

753
00:37:24.639 --> 00:37:26.519
<v Speaker 2>Dart definitely has a lot of upside, but I think

754
00:37:26.559 --> 00:37:28.840
<v Speaker 2>this is just a tough spot for him, going against

755
00:37:28.880 --> 00:37:32.480
<v Speaker 2>a really good defense at Jesse Menzer coach defense in

756
00:37:32.519 --> 00:37:36.119
<v Speaker 2>his first career start. I like the upside, but I mean,

757
00:37:36.199 --> 00:37:39.199
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about a guy who admittedly is not healthy,

758
00:37:39.199 --> 00:37:41.400
<v Speaker 2>but when he's healthy, He's a top five fantasy quarterback.

759
00:37:41.480 --> 00:37:44.559
<v Speaker 2>I think it's it's it's too it's too aggressive to

760
00:37:44.559 --> 00:37:47.199
<v Speaker 2>throw Jackson Dart in the same conversation that quickly.

761
00:37:48.440 --> 00:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>In Cognito TK on YouTube, this is an interesting one.

762
00:37:52.559 --> 00:37:55.639
<v Speaker 1>He has the opportunity to part with Lamar Jackson and

763
00:37:55.760 --> 00:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Zay Flowers in exchange for Kyler Murray, Marvin Harrison Junior,

764
00:37:59.440 --> 00:38:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and saque Barkley. So you're trading this Baltimore hookup stack

765
00:38:03.639 --> 00:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in exchange for an Arizona one, and you're also getting

766
00:38:06.480 --> 00:38:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Barkley with that as well. I feel like you are

767
00:38:08.679 --> 00:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>buying low on Murray, Harrison, and Barkley right now. You

768
00:38:13.320 --> 00:38:15.280
<v Speaker 1>may or may not be trading high on Jackson. I

769
00:38:15.320 --> 00:38:18.079
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I feel like you're probably just getting normal

770
00:38:18.159 --> 00:38:21.679
<v Speaker 1>value for Zay Jones. Where would you stand in on

771
00:38:21.719 --> 00:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>this deal? It's very tempting when you throw Barkley in there.

772
00:38:25.039 --> 00:38:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Jack Yeah, it's Saquon for me. I definitely like the

773
00:38:28.960 --> 00:38:29.679
<v Speaker 2>Saquon side.

774
00:38:29.719 --> 00:38:30.119
<v Speaker 3>I think.

775
00:38:30.679 --> 00:38:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I think if you have an opportunity to get Saquon

776
00:38:33.559 --> 00:38:38.559
<v Speaker 2>and two very viable starters in addition in exchange for

777
00:38:38.639 --> 00:38:40.800
<v Speaker 2>the Maaron z, I think it's a pretty clear take.

778
00:38:40.880 --> 00:38:44.320
<v Speaker 1>For me, We'll get into Marvin Harrison in about fifteen

779
00:38:44.320 --> 00:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes or so. Because I want to pick your

780
00:38:45.960 --> 00:38:53.920
<v Speaker 1>brain on that. Let's go with gravity on twitch, picking

781
00:38:53.960 --> 00:38:57.559
<v Speaker 1>two out of the four here, Metcalf, Harrison, Golden, Coleman.

782
00:38:57.920 --> 00:39:01.280
<v Speaker 1>He's leaning Golden and Coleman right now. I would lean

783
00:39:01.360 --> 00:39:04.800
<v Speaker 1>against that. I feel like you gotta get metcalf in there,

784
00:39:05.639 --> 00:39:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and quite frankly, I think I take Harrison here. I

785
00:39:08.840 --> 00:39:12.320
<v Speaker 1>think I go Metcalf Harrison over Golden and Coldan. It's weird, Jack,

786
00:39:12.360 --> 00:39:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I've spent all week talking up Matthew Golden,

787
00:39:14.880 --> 00:39:17.159
<v Speaker 1>how he's going to destroy the Cowboys, and yet every

788
00:39:17.280 --> 00:39:19.519
<v Speaker 1>question I get, I'm saying, now bench Golden. Now, I

789
00:39:19.599 --> 00:39:22.280
<v Speaker 1>like the other options better. It's weird, but I think

790
00:39:22.320 --> 00:39:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it's metcalf and Harrison here for me.

791
00:39:24.480 --> 00:39:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, if there's ever a breakout spot for

792
00:39:26.400 --> 00:39:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Golden, this is it against this defense that's just

793
00:39:28.960 --> 00:39:31.360
<v Speaker 2>gotten torn up two weeks in a row. With that

794
00:39:31.440 --> 00:39:34.039
<v Speaker 2>being said, I'm with you, I'd like to see it

795
00:39:34.119 --> 00:39:38.079
<v Speaker 2>before I start starting Golden over guys like Metcalfin and

796
00:39:38.119 --> 00:39:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Harrison Junr as as rough as it has been for

797
00:39:40.840 --> 00:39:43.960
<v Speaker 2>both of those guys. I still I'm still clinging to

798
00:39:43.960 --> 00:39:46.360
<v Speaker 2>the prize a little bit and going with Metcalffin and

799
00:39:46.400 --> 00:39:47.599
<v Speaker 2>Marvin Harrison.

800
00:39:47.760 --> 00:39:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Gravity it's chimed in too. Like you talk about Metcalf,

801
00:39:50.559 --> 00:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>he started off the season with a seven target game

802
00:39:53.400 --> 00:39:56.199
<v Speaker 1>that's has been his most then he followed up with

803
00:39:56.239 --> 00:39:59.639
<v Speaker 1>six four targets. He gets the vikings on Sunday. He

804
00:39:59.800 --> 00:40:02.719
<v Speaker 1>has had to rely on touchdowns to be Fantasy relevant

805
00:40:02.880 --> 00:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>from a weekly, week by week basis. But I would

806
00:40:06.440 --> 00:40:09.199
<v Speaker 1>counter that saying that Kean Coleman's best game was Week

807
00:40:09.280 --> 00:40:11.800
<v Speaker 1>one and I don't know if he's been getting targets.

808
00:40:11.800 --> 00:40:14.559
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Golden, I can guarantee you has not been getting targets,

809
00:40:14.599 --> 00:40:17.280
<v Speaker 1>like maybe a few more in Week three with no

810
00:40:17.480 --> 00:40:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Jayden Reid. But I do think the argument that you're

811
00:40:21.079 --> 00:40:24.320
<v Speaker 1>making with Metcalf, you could make the same argument about Coleman.

812
00:40:24.360 --> 00:40:26.280
<v Speaker 1>You make the same argument about Golden as well, and

813
00:40:26.320 --> 00:40:29.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe even Harrison to a certain extent too. But I

814
00:40:29.280 --> 00:40:32.239
<v Speaker 1>think the upside plays, even though Golden's one of them,

815
00:40:32.239 --> 00:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that Metcalf and Harrison is where I would

816
00:40:36.559 --> 00:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>roll on this. Okay, let's move back to what did

817
00:40:41.920 --> 00:40:43.519
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about Oh. I was like, oh,

818
00:40:43.599 --> 00:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>this is great, let's talk about Juwan Jennings right after

819
00:40:45.960 --> 00:40:47.400
<v Speaker 1>we talk about brock Perty and then we got a

820
00:40:47.400 --> 00:40:49.039
<v Speaker 1>bunch of questions. It is what it is. We'll go

821
00:40:49.079 --> 00:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>back to San Francisco here. In regards to Juwan Jennings,

822
00:40:52.000 --> 00:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>who was inactive last week, Jack a guy that was

823
00:40:58.559 --> 00:41:03.119
<v Speaker 1>very polarizing in rafting season, a guy that we didn't

824
00:41:03.119 --> 00:41:04.840
<v Speaker 1>know if it was a calf injury, we didn't know,

825
00:41:04.840 --> 00:41:06.480
<v Speaker 1>if it was a contract, we didn't know if it

826
00:41:06.519 --> 00:41:09.159
<v Speaker 1>was a combination of the two. And then he sits

827
00:41:09.199 --> 00:41:11.840
<v Speaker 1>out last week, and Ricky Pearsall has a pretty big

828
00:41:11.840 --> 00:41:14.719
<v Speaker 1>week and Mac Jones was looking to him early and often.

829
00:41:15.199 --> 00:41:19.079
<v Speaker 1>This just coming six minutes ago from Demetrius Harvey. Juwan

830
00:41:19.199 --> 00:41:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Jennings did not practice today for the forty nine ers.

831
00:41:24.039 --> 00:41:27.519
<v Speaker 1>The reports we got yesterday it seemed like, you know,

832
00:41:27.840 --> 00:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>veteran rest, just give him extra day, And now it

833
00:41:29.920 --> 00:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like that's the case at all. He is

834
00:41:32.519 --> 00:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>on the injury report officially for the forty nine ers

835
00:41:34.960 --> 00:41:39.000
<v Speaker 1>today with ankle and shoulder injuries. Right now, if he

836
00:41:39.079 --> 00:41:41.639
<v Speaker 1>gets in a limited practice tomorrow, yeah, I feel a

837
00:41:41.639 --> 00:41:45.280
<v Speaker 1>lot more confident about flexing Jennings out. But from what

838
00:41:45.320 --> 00:41:47.239
<v Speaker 1>I saw last week with Pearsall and I know we're

839
00:41:47.239 --> 00:41:50.800
<v Speaker 1>going back to brock Purty this week. But Piersall, I

840
00:41:50.840 --> 00:41:52.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say, he looks like the real deal,

841
00:41:52.400 --> 00:41:55.239
<v Speaker 1>but he looks very, very good, and he's coming into

842
00:41:55.239 --> 00:41:58.159
<v Speaker 1>a situation or Jennings is coming into a situation where

843
00:41:58.159 --> 00:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>he's got to make him know he's sort of got

844
00:42:01.239 --> 00:42:03.559
<v Speaker 1>to force the issue to get the ball. With Pearsall

845
00:42:03.639 --> 00:42:06.320
<v Speaker 1>looking so good, I don't feel real good about Jennings

846
00:42:06.480 --> 00:42:08.280
<v Speaker 1>this week, even if he does get in a limited

847
00:42:08.320 --> 00:42:09.119
<v Speaker 1>practice tomorrow.

848
00:42:09.880 --> 00:42:11.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think you can start up yourself for sure.

849
00:42:11.719 --> 00:42:15.119
<v Speaker 2>Regardless of what happens with Jron, Jennings and Drew On,

850
00:42:15.239 --> 00:42:17.559
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot comes down to tomorrow. I'm I'm

851
00:42:17.599 --> 00:42:20.679
<v Speaker 2>a little surprised he's dnped twice in a row. After

852
00:42:20.719 --> 00:42:23.239
<v Speaker 2>it seemed like he was maybe airing on the side

853
00:42:23.239 --> 00:42:26.480
<v Speaker 2>of doubtful but at least semi questionable going into last weekend.

854
00:42:26.480 --> 00:42:28.039
<v Speaker 2>Now it seems like he might be a risk of

855
00:42:28.039 --> 00:42:32.280
<v Speaker 2>missing a second straight week. I think hopefully we'll get

856
00:42:32.360 --> 00:42:36.639
<v Speaker 2>a lot more information on his actual health before Locke

857
00:42:36.679 --> 00:42:40.320
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday. I do think that if he's limited, he's

858
00:42:40.360 --> 00:42:43.360
<v Speaker 2>a pretty tough start. If we don't get any more information,

859
00:42:44.039 --> 00:42:46.559
<v Speaker 2>we don't know how much he's gonna play. It seems

860
00:42:46.599 --> 00:42:49.199
<v Speaker 2>like a more serious injury than we thought maybe at

861
00:42:49.199 --> 00:42:50.079
<v Speaker 2>this time last week.

862
00:42:50.119 --> 00:42:51.440
<v Speaker 3>So I'm with you there.

863
00:42:52.239 --> 00:42:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Our Highland on YouTube PPR Flex League question starter said

864
00:42:56.800 --> 00:43:00.639
<v Speaker 1>trade Benson, Chris Olave, Matthew Golden or Teteroa McMillan. He

865
00:43:00.719 --> 00:43:02.800
<v Speaker 1>says he's not sure if he's all in on the

866
00:43:02.840 --> 00:43:06.559
<v Speaker 1>trade Benson trade and the potential matchup against Dallas is

867
00:43:06.599 --> 00:43:09.360
<v Speaker 1>tough for him to pass up with Golden, you can

868
00:43:09.440 --> 00:43:13.599
<v Speaker 1>only pick one of these guys if it's one. To me,

869
00:43:13.760 --> 00:43:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not Golden. It comes down to me between

870
00:43:16.920 --> 00:43:21.440
<v Speaker 1>McMillan and Benson. And I think, again this is full PPR.

871
00:43:21.519 --> 00:43:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I think I leaned towards McMillan. He practiced yesterday, Did

872
00:43:25.119 --> 00:43:27.400
<v Speaker 1>he practice today? I think he practiced today. He did

873
00:43:27.400 --> 00:43:30.880
<v Speaker 1>not practice yesterday with the with the calf issue, which

874
00:43:30.920 --> 00:43:33.559
<v Speaker 1>I know is always, you know, a difficult thing to to,

875
00:43:34.079 --> 00:43:36.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, to try to assess when you're looking into,

876
00:43:37.039 --> 00:43:39.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, how successful a player is going to be

877
00:43:39.119 --> 00:43:42.519
<v Speaker 1>that week. But I think I would rank a McMillan, Benson,

878
00:43:42.599 --> 00:43:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Golden o'lave. Here it's close between Golden o'lave as well.

879
00:43:45.960 --> 00:43:46.920
<v Speaker 1>This is a good problem to have.

880
00:43:48.400 --> 00:43:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think of picking one, it's clearly McMillan or Benson.

881
00:43:51.360 --> 00:43:55.320
<v Speaker 2>This is another one where my first instinct was pretty

882
00:43:55.320 --> 00:43:59.159
<v Speaker 2>clearly McMillan. But we do have Benson higher once again,

883
00:43:59.599 --> 00:44:01.639
<v Speaker 2>so I guess, I guess maybe you have to go

884
00:44:01.719 --> 00:44:04.800
<v Speaker 2>trade Benson. Although honestly, with how good McMillan's looked, I

885
00:44:04.840 --> 00:44:06.960
<v Speaker 2>know the passing offense as a whole has looked a

886
00:44:07.000 --> 00:44:10.039
<v Speaker 2>little bit rough at times, but I I'd have a

887
00:44:10.079 --> 00:44:12.639
<v Speaker 2>really tough time benching Teedoro McMillan.

888
00:44:14.840 --> 00:44:20.599
<v Speaker 1>War Eagle. Should I trade Nico Collins for Saquon Barkley.

889
00:44:21.079 --> 00:44:23.519
<v Speaker 1>This is one of those classic questions. Jack. It depends

890
00:44:23.559 --> 00:44:26.719
<v Speaker 1>what you're running back and receiver. You know, situation looks

891
00:44:26.800 --> 00:44:30.880
<v Speaker 1>like right in a vacuum, I think I'd rather have

892
00:44:31.000 --> 00:44:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Collins over Barkley. Your thoughts.

893
00:44:34.119 --> 00:44:36.360
<v Speaker 2>It definitely comes down the way you need more. I

894
00:44:36.400 --> 00:44:41.480
<v Speaker 2>think I lean Barkley over Nico. With how poor the

895
00:44:41.480 --> 00:44:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Texans offense has looked, I know that the Eagles offense

896
00:44:44.360 --> 00:44:46.760
<v Speaker 2>for the most part, has not looked super inspiring you.

897
00:44:46.920 --> 00:44:49.280
<v Speaker 2>But we're still talking about a guy who just coming

898
00:44:49.320 --> 00:44:53.039
<v Speaker 2>off a historic season. So I'm not moving off Saquon

899
00:44:53.079 --> 00:44:54.159
<v Speaker 2>Barkley that quickly.

900
00:44:55.280 --> 00:44:58.280
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys are not only going to be having their

901
00:44:58.280 --> 00:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>hands full with the Green Bay offense on Sunday Night,

902
00:45:00.920 --> 00:45:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Football Jack, They're gonna have their hands full with the

903
00:45:03.840 --> 00:45:07.079
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay defense without at least we think we believe

904
00:45:07.440 --> 00:45:10.920
<v Speaker 1>without Ceedee Lamb, who did not practice yesterday. I assume

905
00:45:10.920 --> 00:45:13.760
<v Speaker 1>he did not practice today. It's wild because you know,

906
00:45:13.880 --> 00:45:17.000
<v Speaker 1>he's been diagnosed and reported as a high ankle sprain,

907
00:45:17.480 --> 00:45:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and yet he has not been ruled out these high

908
00:45:19.320 --> 00:45:21.639
<v Speaker 1>ankle sprains. We normally think it's like a month, month

909
00:45:21.679 --> 00:45:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and a half, and yet we're hanging on pins and

910
00:45:24.199 --> 00:45:26.039
<v Speaker 1>needles whether Jerry Jones is gonna let us know if

911
00:45:26.119 --> 00:45:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Lamb practice, like he's not gonna play Sunday Night. In

912
00:45:29.519 --> 00:45:32.079
<v Speaker 1>the case that he does not practice or does not

913
00:45:32.119 --> 00:45:36.280
<v Speaker 1>play on Sunday Night, is there another guy besides Pickens,

914
00:45:36.320 --> 00:45:40.559
<v Speaker 1>besides Ferguson that you can look out flexing, look at Flexing,

915
00:45:41.119 --> 00:45:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Cavante Turpin, Jalen Tolbert probably the most likely candidates. Maybe

916
00:45:47.159 --> 00:45:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the question is not oh, who do I start between

917
00:45:50.679 --> 00:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>those two guys. Maybe the question is, if you only

918
00:45:53.039 --> 00:45:55.639
<v Speaker 1>have one roster spot, who's the right guy to roster

919
00:45:55.800 --> 00:45:58.840
<v Speaker 1>on your team that you can deploy out as a

920
00:45:58.880 --> 00:46:01.599
<v Speaker 1>flex when the buys hit next week when Ceedee Lamb,

921
00:46:01.679 --> 00:46:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you know again we think will not be playing for

922
00:46:03.920 --> 00:46:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a while.

923
00:46:04.960 --> 00:46:07.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if I only had one roster spot, it would

924
00:46:07.199 --> 00:46:10.199
<v Speaker 2>be Cavante Turpin. I think Tolbert's gonna play more. I

925
00:46:10.199 --> 00:46:13.239
<v Speaker 2>think he's I think the Cowboys probably see him as

926
00:46:13.239 --> 00:46:16.039
<v Speaker 2>a more traditional wide receiver and like sticking him in

927
00:46:16.159 --> 00:46:19.559
<v Speaker 2>the role vacated by Lamb. But I think we've kind

928
00:46:19.559 --> 00:46:21.840
<v Speaker 2>of seen what Jalen Tolbert is at this point, whereas

929
00:46:21.880 --> 00:46:25.199
<v Speaker 2>we haven't really seen the upside of uh of a

930
00:46:25.239 --> 00:46:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Cavante Turpin. He's really explosive with the ball in the sands.

931
00:46:27.760 --> 00:46:30.679
<v Speaker 2>We know that from his time returning kicks, and he's

932
00:46:30.679 --> 00:46:33.960
<v Speaker 2>been a really strong target earner throughout his career. So

933
00:46:34.039 --> 00:46:38.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's anything resembling a fantasy starter right now,

934
00:46:39.280 --> 00:46:41.840
<v Speaker 2>but I think that he's probably worth adding and seeing

935
00:46:41.840 --> 00:46:43.639
<v Speaker 2>if he can grow into more of a full time role,

936
00:46:43.679 --> 00:46:46.599
<v Speaker 2>And maybe you surp Tulbert for that second outside wide

937
00:46:46.599 --> 00:46:47.920
<v Speaker 2>receiver role with lamb Out.

938
00:46:48.800 --> 00:46:51.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, normally I wouldn't bring stuff like this up,

939
00:46:51.400 --> 00:46:55.039
<v Speaker 1>But when you have a defense as bad as Dallas's is,

940
00:46:55.519 --> 00:46:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and when you are when you have an offense, seemingly

941
00:46:59.360 --> 00:47:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that's his talent as the Cowboys, and I know they're

942
00:47:01.280 --> 00:47:03.800
<v Speaker 1>missing Booker their guard for a while, which is obviously

943
00:47:03.800 --> 00:47:06.199
<v Speaker 1>gonna hurt Javonte Williams, who's been very, very good this year.

944
00:47:06.599 --> 00:47:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Prescott's accomplished quarterback. Ferguson and Pickens are legit weapons at

945
00:47:10.679 --> 00:47:14.719
<v Speaker 1>their respective positions. When you talk about players, are a

946
00:47:14.719 --> 00:47:17.519
<v Speaker 1>team that can be in shootouts week after week after week.

947
00:47:18.079 --> 00:47:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Turpin and versus Tolbert, I think is an interesting discussion

948
00:47:21.119 --> 00:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to have as far as which one you want a

949
00:47:23.039 --> 00:47:26.159
<v Speaker 1>roster and deploy him whoever that player is in the

950
00:47:26.199 --> 00:47:29.519
<v Speaker 1>right situations here as well, n seven to one to

951
00:47:29.559 --> 00:47:33.280
<v Speaker 1>two hockey, Hey, guys, would you start Sam Donald tonight

952
00:47:34.039 --> 00:47:37.400
<v Speaker 1>or Matthew Stafford on Sunday? This is the question that

953
00:47:37.800 --> 00:47:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is facing him. Donald obviously facing the Cardinals tonight. Matthew

954
00:47:41.400 --> 00:47:46.559
<v Speaker 1>Stafford is at home against the Colts on Sunday. Donald v. Stafford.

955
00:47:47.039 --> 00:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I lean towards old coyote and say Stafford here and

956
00:47:51.000 --> 00:47:54.440
<v Speaker 1>actually I should bring this up right now too. I

957
00:47:54.480 --> 00:47:59.960
<v Speaker 1>said I had breaking news before on a on a

958
00:48:00.039 --> 00:48:02.679
<v Speaker 1>stud receiver, and that receiver was Devonte Adams, and I'm

959
00:48:02.679 --> 00:48:06.079
<v Speaker 1>trying to find it. Adam schefter Jack Miller has said

960
00:48:06.159 --> 00:48:09.559
<v Speaker 1>for a second straight day, Davante Adams did not practice

961
00:48:09.639 --> 00:48:12.800
<v Speaker 1>due to a hamstring injury. So we have to keep

962
00:48:12.840 --> 00:48:16.119
<v Speaker 1>that into take that into account when we say whether

963
00:48:16.119 --> 00:48:21.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna play Stafford or Donald. I am concerned about Adams,

964
00:48:21.400 --> 00:48:23.559
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's on the wrong side of thirty, who's

965
00:48:23.599 --> 00:48:26.320
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a soft tissue injury and specifically a muscle

966
00:48:26.360 --> 00:48:29.079
<v Speaker 1>that can be tricky for wide receivers. If he doesn't

967
00:48:29.119 --> 00:48:33.320
<v Speaker 1>practice tomorrow, this is a problem and a bigger problem

968
00:48:33.480 --> 00:48:35.679
<v Speaker 1>for N seven to one to two hockey. He's got

969
00:48:35.679 --> 00:48:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to make this decision tonight. Is he benching Stafford for

970
00:48:38.440 --> 00:48:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Donald against the Cardinals on Thursday Night Football?

971
00:48:41.559 --> 00:48:45.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm going Stafford there. I do think it's right to

972
00:48:45.199 --> 00:48:47.480
<v Speaker 2>be a little concerned on Devonte Adams. You never like

973
00:48:47.519 --> 00:48:51.360
<v Speaker 2>to see a Thursday hamstring DMP from an older wide receiver.

974
00:48:51.519 --> 00:48:54.320
<v Speaker 2>But I think even if DeVante doesn't play, I think

975
00:48:54.360 --> 00:48:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I still even lean Stafford. I just think that there's

976
00:48:57.280 --> 00:49:00.000
<v Speaker 2>much more scoring upside in that game than Donald who

977
00:49:00.199 --> 00:49:04.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of lean on this Seahawks defense a little bit

978
00:49:04.440 --> 00:49:07.960
<v Speaker 2>against the Cardinals offense that has not been as high

979
00:49:08.000 --> 00:49:10.199
<v Speaker 2>flying as the Colts, which is not something I thought

980
00:49:10.199 --> 00:49:11.719
<v Speaker 2>I'd say three weeks ago.

981
00:49:12.000 --> 00:49:12.840
<v Speaker 3>But here we are.

982
00:49:14.320 --> 00:49:16.599
<v Speaker 1>I want to We had a ton rolling in on

983
00:49:16.639 --> 00:49:20.280
<v Speaker 1>twitch right now. Brawley six one nine yo yo start

984
00:49:20.360 --> 00:49:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Kyron Williams, Omari and Hampton or Jordan Mason. Here's a

985
00:49:23.760 --> 00:49:27.320
<v Speaker 1>fun little twist, non PPR. We don't often see these questions,

986
00:49:27.440 --> 00:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but we get it tonight. Hampton at the Giants, Kyron

987
00:49:30.519 --> 00:49:33.039
<v Speaker 1>Williams at home against the Colts, and then the other

988
00:49:33.079 --> 00:49:37.800
<v Speaker 1>one was Jordan Mason, who was at Pittsburgh technically at

989
00:49:37.920 --> 00:49:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Dublin against the Steelers. Uh PSA, get your lineup set

990
00:49:41.840 --> 00:49:44.559
<v Speaker 1>early with for that nine thirty am Eastern time kickoff

991
00:49:44.599 --> 00:49:47.559
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. God, you gotta bench one of these guys.

992
00:49:47.599 --> 00:49:52.119
<v Speaker 1>I like them all. Maybe with Blake Korum eating into

993
00:49:52.320 --> 00:49:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the volume for the Rams, you bench Kien Williams here.

994
00:49:56.880 --> 00:49:59.519
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what my instinct is telling me. Ampton

995
00:49:59.519 --> 00:50:01.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to deal with Harris Mason doesn't have to

996
00:50:01.880 --> 00:50:03.760
<v Speaker 1>lead to deal with Joanes, So I think I might

997
00:50:03.840 --> 00:50:05.320
<v Speaker 1>sit Kyrien Williams here. Jack.

998
00:50:06.880 --> 00:50:07.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

999
00:50:07.280 --> 00:50:09.519
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if this is your decision, you're probably in

1000
00:50:09.559 --> 00:50:12.920
<v Speaker 2>pretty good shape regardless of who you start. I think

1001
00:50:13.039 --> 00:50:16.519
<v Speaker 2>I leen Jordan Mason in non PPR. I just think

1002
00:50:16.559 --> 00:50:19.239
<v Speaker 2>the rushing is the rushing workload. It's going to be

1003
00:50:19.280 --> 00:50:22.280
<v Speaker 2>so good with Carson Wentz under center. They're going to

1004
00:50:22.360 --> 00:50:25.159
<v Speaker 2>really lean on Mason, and he's looked really effective so far.

1005
00:50:25.960 --> 00:50:28.199
<v Speaker 1>But if if you had to sit one of them,

1006
00:50:28.199 --> 00:50:29.239
<v Speaker 1>because he can start to.

1007
00:50:29.679 --> 00:50:30.440
<v Speaker 3>I can start too.

1008
00:50:30.599 --> 00:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1009
00:50:31.280 --> 00:50:35.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm probably Mason and Hampton as well. Hampton should be

1010
00:50:35.679 --> 00:50:40.519
<v Speaker 2>pretty close to maybe like ninety plus percent snaps, which

1011
00:50:40.559 --> 00:50:42.760
<v Speaker 2>is something we so rarely see at the running back position.

1012
00:50:42.800 --> 00:50:45.960
<v Speaker 2>But with Hassan Haskins this is direct backup. I think

1013
00:50:45.960 --> 00:50:47.159
<v Speaker 2>that he could really flirt with that.

1014
00:50:48.280 --> 00:50:50.679
<v Speaker 1>So the next one we have is from drunk Goldfish

1015
00:50:50.760 --> 00:50:54.239
<v Speaker 1>double Low on Twitch. He's got to pick one of

1016
00:50:54.280 --> 00:50:57.480
<v Speaker 1>these players. Trade Benson, Calvin Ridley, or Jerry Judy. Jerry

1017
00:50:57.559 --> 00:51:01.039
<v Speaker 1>Judy obviously at the Lions, trade Benson tonight against the

1018
00:51:01.639 --> 00:51:05.039
<v Speaker 1>against the Seahawks, and Calvin Ridley. To me, who's at

1019
00:51:05.039 --> 00:51:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the Texans unplayable right now? This is Benson, and I

1020
00:51:08.920 --> 00:51:10.360
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't think twice about it.

1021
00:51:11.039 --> 00:51:12.119
<v Speaker 3>Yep, I'm with you.

1022
00:51:12.280 --> 00:51:14.280
<v Speaker 2>This is the first time where I don't have to

1023
00:51:14.320 --> 00:51:16.880
<v Speaker 2>look at the projections to tell me Trey Benson this is.

1024
00:51:16.960 --> 00:51:18.320
<v Speaker 3>This is pretty clearly Benson.

1025
00:51:20.480 --> 00:51:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't Jack. I can't remember if we answered this before.

1026
00:51:22.960 --> 00:51:26.559
<v Speaker 1>We may have, but Derek Abreu has a chance to

1027
00:51:26.599 --> 00:51:30.320
<v Speaker 1>start Trey Benson tonight or Chewba Hubbard. This is PPR.

1028
00:51:30.880 --> 00:51:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I would say Benson over Hubbard here. I think that's

1029
00:51:33.320 --> 00:51:35.239
<v Speaker 1>what I said before as well.

1030
00:51:35.519 --> 00:51:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think Benson.

1031
00:51:37.519 --> 00:51:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and then our Highland on YouTube. This is another

1032
00:51:41.400 --> 00:51:44.599
<v Speaker 1>Vikings question. Do you think that Jordan Mason is going

1033
00:51:44.679 --> 00:51:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to relinquish touches when Aaron Jones returns, and if if so,

1034
00:51:48.559 --> 00:51:51.039
<v Speaker 1>does it go anywhere close to a split? I lean

1035
00:51:51.119 --> 00:51:53.360
<v Speaker 1>back to what we were talking about all off season

1036
00:51:53.480 --> 00:51:55.519
<v Speaker 1>that this was always going to be a split between

1037
00:51:55.639 --> 00:51:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Jones and between Mason, given the what the draft capital

1038
00:51:59.320 --> 00:52:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that the Vikings gave up and then obviously signed Jordan

1039
00:52:03.039 --> 00:52:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Mason to that contract extension as well. So yeah, I

1040
00:52:06.639 --> 00:52:08.559
<v Speaker 1>think it's very close to a split. I think Mason

1041
00:52:08.599 --> 00:52:11.239
<v Speaker 1>gets more of the rushing carries. I think Aaron Jones

1042
00:52:11.239 --> 00:52:14.159
<v Speaker 1>gets more of the passing catches as it were, and

1043
00:52:14.480 --> 00:52:16.159
<v Speaker 1>we go back to how it was in Week one

1044
00:52:16.199 --> 00:52:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and week two. I don't think there's any reason for

1045
00:52:18.760 --> 00:52:20.280
<v Speaker 1>me to believe it's gonna be any different.

1046
00:52:21.519 --> 00:52:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Yep, I'm with you. I don't think they're gonna just

1047
00:52:24.519 --> 00:52:26.880
<v Speaker 2>banish Aaron Jones to a handcuff roll a lot. I

1048
00:52:26.920 --> 00:52:30.480
<v Speaker 2>don't think that makes much sense, even if Mason is

1049
00:52:30.519 --> 00:52:33.840
<v Speaker 2>the superior rusher at this point, which he might be.

1050
00:52:33.920 --> 00:52:36.079
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Jones still ran very well last year, but

1051
00:52:36.159 --> 00:52:39.559
<v Speaker 2>Jones is definitely the superior pass catcher, so I think

1052
00:52:39.599 --> 00:52:42.920
<v Speaker 2>it makes sense to keep both involved once Jones is back.

1053
00:52:43.400 --> 00:52:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Chance F twenty thousand again. Tight End Question, Sam Laporta

1054
00:52:46.719 --> 00:52:49.599
<v Speaker 1>or the resurgent Dalton kin Kaid. Nate pol Volt from

1055
00:52:49.639 --> 00:52:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Optimus Fantasy co hosted this show with me last week,

1056
00:52:52.320 --> 00:52:55.159
<v Speaker 1>and we were basically talking about how we've given up

1057
00:52:55.199 --> 00:52:58.480
<v Speaker 1>on Kinkaid. He's a sit even in tight end Premium.

1058
00:52:58.559 --> 00:53:00.840
<v Speaker 1>He's got to show us something first, well, Jack show

1059
00:53:00.920 --> 00:53:03.800
<v Speaker 1>us something he did, because Kinkaid had the best game

1060
00:53:03.840 --> 00:53:07.599
<v Speaker 1>of his season so far last week, maybe his best

1061
00:53:07.639 --> 00:53:09.960
<v Speaker 1>game in the last two years, and now all of

1062
00:53:09.960 --> 00:53:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a sudden it is a question about Laporta versus Kinkaid.

1063
00:53:13.000 --> 00:53:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Laporta at home against the Browns Kinkaid obviously in the

1064
00:53:16.840 --> 00:53:20.840
<v Speaker 1>massive favorites, or playing on the Bills, who are massive

1065
00:53:20.840 --> 00:53:24.880
<v Speaker 1>favorites at home against the Saints. I'm a weak man.

1066
00:53:25.039 --> 00:53:27.599
<v Speaker 1>I can't make the call to start Kinkaid over Laporta.

1067
00:53:27.679 --> 00:53:29.480
<v Speaker 1>So I still rolle with Laporta here.

1068
00:53:30.360 --> 00:53:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm with you.

1069
00:53:30.960 --> 00:53:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I know it's a tough matchup for Laporta against the

1070
00:53:32.800 --> 00:53:35.599
<v Speaker 2>Browns defense that's playing awesome, But I think this Detroit

1071
00:53:35.719 --> 00:53:37.880
<v Speaker 2>offense is so good that it's still going to be

1072
00:53:37.920 --> 00:53:40.639
<v Speaker 2>able to move the ball and score points. Kinkaid definitely

1073
00:53:40.679 --> 00:53:43.280
<v Speaker 2>has touchdown upside again in this matchup against the Saints.

1074
00:53:43.280 --> 00:53:45.719
<v Speaker 2>For their massive favorites. I mean, the Bills are going

1075
00:53:45.760 --> 00:53:48.199
<v Speaker 2>to be super efficient on offense, but there is a

1076
00:53:48.199 --> 00:53:51.679
<v Speaker 2>big pass voguing question. I mean, they're seventeen sixteen point favorites.

1077
00:53:51.920 --> 00:53:54.800
<v Speaker 2>If they get up fourteen and a half, we might

1078
00:53:54.840 --> 00:53:56.599
<v Speaker 2>not see many second half pass attempts.

1079
00:53:57.760 --> 00:53:59.440
<v Speaker 3>So I like Laporta here.

1080
00:54:00.440 --> 00:54:05.920
<v Speaker 1>The conversation about Amari and Hampton that we've had tonight

1081
00:54:05.960 --> 00:54:08.599
<v Speaker 1>has mostly been like, you know, starter sits or whatever,

1082
00:54:08.639 --> 00:54:11.199
<v Speaker 1>and people you know myself included. I benched him in

1083
00:54:11.199 --> 00:54:13.039
<v Speaker 1>one league where I was deep at running back last

1084
00:54:13.039 --> 00:54:15.559
<v Speaker 1>week because I needed to see something first. And now

1085
00:54:15.639 --> 00:54:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Naji Harris is going to be out for the year.

1086
00:54:18.159 --> 00:54:22.519
<v Speaker 1>Jim Harbaugh confirming that Harris has torn his achilles in

1087
00:54:22.679 --> 00:54:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the Week three game against the Denver Broncos, non contact injury.

1088
00:54:27.880 --> 00:54:30.800
<v Speaker 1>He's twenty seven years old. Hopefully bounces back and finds

1089
00:54:30.800 --> 00:54:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a home somewhere in the NFL next year. But this

1090
00:54:33.000 --> 00:54:35.719
<v Speaker 1>is this is awful guy coming off a quote unquote

1091
00:54:35.719 --> 00:54:39.440
<v Speaker 1>superficial eye injury in a fireworks accident on July fourth,

1092
00:54:39.760 --> 00:54:42.639
<v Speaker 1>to Week three in the NFL, where he tears his achilles.

1093
00:54:44.440 --> 00:54:47.000
<v Speaker 1>The question that we have to ask is not necessarily

1094
00:54:47.039 --> 00:54:50.360
<v Speaker 1>heys Amari and Hampton suddenly startable again. No, the question

1095
00:54:50.440 --> 00:54:53.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you, Jack, Jim Harbaugh said, Kamani

1096
00:54:53.280 --> 00:54:55.559
<v Speaker 1>Vidal was the next man up. And I don't know

1097
00:54:55.599 --> 00:54:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the context behind this quote, but I do know that

1098
00:54:57.840 --> 00:55:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Vidal was inactive throughout the season, whereas Hassan Haskins was

1099
00:55:02.239 --> 00:55:04.880
<v Speaker 1>playing in front of him. When I submitted my waiver

1100
00:55:04.920 --> 00:55:07.840
<v Speaker 1>bids last night in my league's I prioritize I did not.

1101
00:55:07.880 --> 00:55:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I put in anything on Vidal,

1102
00:55:10.320 --> 00:55:13.800
<v Speaker 1>but I did put in some low to modest bids

1103
00:55:13.840 --> 00:55:17.239
<v Speaker 1>on Hassan Haskins. Always, you know, playing in these deep leagues,

1104
00:55:17.239 --> 00:55:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you're always trying to get the guy behind the guy,

1105
00:55:19.679 --> 00:55:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and Haskins, I believe is the guy behind Hampton. So

1106
00:55:22.199 --> 00:55:24.920
<v Speaker 1>if anything happens to Hampton, Haskins is going to have

1107
00:55:25.039 --> 00:55:27.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe not a bellcow role, but definitely a significant role,

1108
00:55:27.920 --> 00:55:30.719
<v Speaker 1>a flexible role in this Chargers team that's three and

1109
00:55:30.760 --> 00:55:33.800
<v Speaker 1>oer right now looking very good. Your thoughts on Haskins

1110
00:55:33.920 --> 00:55:37.760
<v Speaker 1>versus Vidal. If you can only roster one, is it Haskins?

1111
00:55:37.800 --> 00:55:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And how strong you believe that that Haskins, you know,

1112
00:55:41.880 --> 00:55:46.079
<v Speaker 1>would have a startable a semi startable role if anything

1113
00:55:46.079 --> 00:55:47.639
<v Speaker 1>were to happen to Omari and Hampton.

1114
00:55:48.639 --> 00:55:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I saw that quote and I thought it was

1115
00:55:50.599 --> 00:55:53.199
<v Speaker 2>it was pretty interesting given that Haskins had been the

1116
00:55:53.239 --> 00:55:57.880
<v Speaker 2>one who is actually active. I prefer Haskins for that reason.

1117
00:55:58.280 --> 00:56:00.360
<v Speaker 2>That being said, if Hampton were to go down, I

1118
00:56:00.440 --> 00:56:02.760
<v Speaker 2>think it would be a little hard to have much

1119
00:56:02.800 --> 00:56:06.800
<v Speaker 2>confidence in Haskins as a long term option. The Harbaugh

1120
00:56:06.880 --> 00:56:09.360
<v Speaker 2>also said in that press conference, I believe that the

1121
00:56:09.440 --> 00:56:11.639
<v Speaker 2>Traders want to look into adding more running back help,

1122
00:56:12.880 --> 00:56:14.760
<v Speaker 2>so that I think that's something to be aware of

1123
00:56:14.840 --> 00:56:16.920
<v Speaker 2>with Hampton and definitely something to be aware of with

1124
00:56:16.960 --> 00:56:19.920
<v Speaker 2>both Haskins and vit All that if Hampton goes down,

1125
00:56:19.960 --> 00:56:23.320
<v Speaker 2>I think they have to add a running back. I

1126
00:56:23.400 --> 00:56:26.679
<v Speaker 2>do think Haskins is the one two roster though, given

1127
00:56:26.719 --> 00:56:29.039
<v Speaker 2>that he's been active. I just think that if Hampton

1128
00:56:29.079 --> 00:56:31.639
<v Speaker 2>goes down, I don't think the upside is a top

1129
00:56:31.679 --> 00:56:34.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty running back. I think he's someone who maybe you

1130
00:56:34.519 --> 00:56:35.480
<v Speaker 2>could start in the flex.

1131
00:56:36.559 --> 00:56:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to a couple more things before

1132
00:56:38.880 --> 00:56:44.079
<v Speaker 1>we get into our Thursday night football preview. Here, Ezekiel Estrada,

1133
00:56:44.159 --> 00:56:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Good evening, Jens, Kenneth Walker or Trade Benson tonight? He

1134
00:56:47.760 --> 00:56:50.719
<v Speaker 1>has to start one of these guys. To me, slam dunk,

1135
00:56:50.920 --> 00:56:53.519
<v Speaker 1>Zach Sharpnay active, which means it's got to be Trede

1136
00:56:53.519 --> 00:56:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Benson that you start over Kenneth Walker.

1137
00:56:56.360 --> 00:56:59.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm with you. Srebrene full practice all week. I

1138
00:56:59.639 --> 00:57:02.239
<v Speaker 2>could maybe he's a little limited, but we know Tray

1139
00:57:02.239 --> 00:57:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Benson is not going to be limited. We know that

1140
00:57:03.960 --> 00:57:06.039
<v Speaker 2>it's his backfield now with Conra out, so it's Benson

1141
00:57:06.119 --> 00:57:06.320
<v Speaker 2>for me.

1142
00:57:07.159 --> 00:57:10.519
<v Speaker 1>Did the Cleveland Browns running back situation get a lot cleaner.

1143
00:57:10.719 --> 00:57:15.199
<v Speaker 1>After the Packers game last week, Quinchawn Judkins jack eighteen carries,

1144
00:57:15.280 --> 00:57:17.679
<v Speaker 1>ninety four yards, he gets into the end zone, he

1145
00:57:17.800 --> 00:57:20.280
<v Speaker 1>caught a pass for one yard, so granted he wasn't

1146
00:57:20.280 --> 00:57:23.360
<v Speaker 1>heavily involved there. We know Jerome Ford has still been

1147
00:57:23.400 --> 00:57:27.760
<v Speaker 1>out there in you know, two minute situations, passing down situations.

1148
00:57:27.960 --> 00:57:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Samson still coming up the works. But Quinchawn Judkins,

1149
00:57:31.920 --> 00:57:34.239
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this guy missed all of training camp,

1150
00:57:34.320 --> 00:57:37.199
<v Speaker 1>all of preseason, and you know, in his second or

1151
00:57:37.199 --> 00:57:39.440
<v Speaker 1>third game or whatever it is, he's getting eighteen carries.

1152
00:57:39.760 --> 00:57:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what this guy is capable of with proper preparation.

1153
00:57:42.719 --> 00:57:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been pretty impressed so far.

1154
00:57:45.119 --> 00:57:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah I was. I was honestly totally shocked at how

1155
00:57:47.920 --> 00:57:51.199
<v Speaker 2>they used him in week two, immediately making him. I

1156
00:57:51.199 --> 00:57:53.199
<v Speaker 2>think he had ten of twenty running back carries in

1157
00:57:53.559 --> 00:57:56.039
<v Speaker 2>week two, even though he had two practices in the

1158
00:57:56.079 --> 00:57:58.719
<v Speaker 2>previous two months, which I thought that was super impresive.

1159
00:57:58.760 --> 00:58:00.920
<v Speaker 2>I thought Week three was equally pressive when he had

1160
00:58:01.119 --> 00:58:04.679
<v Speaker 2>eighteen of nineteen running back carries for the Browns. Like

1161
00:58:04.719 --> 00:58:06.719
<v Speaker 2>you said, Jerome Ford's still getting all the pass down

1162
00:58:06.760 --> 00:58:09.519
<v Speaker 2>so that kind of limits Judkins upside a little bit,

1163
00:58:10.239 --> 00:58:13.239
<v Speaker 2>but I think it's very clear that they viewed Judkins

1164
00:58:13.280 --> 00:58:15.519
<v Speaker 2>as their running back of the future. I think the

1165
00:58:15.559 --> 00:58:19.119
<v Speaker 2>next question is how much is that actually worth to

1166
00:58:19.199 --> 00:58:21.719
<v Speaker 2>be the RB one for the Cleveland Browns. Joe Flacco

1167
00:58:21.920 --> 00:58:24.400
<v Speaker 2>is the starter for now, but once they go to

1168
00:58:24.480 --> 00:58:27.519
<v Speaker 2>Dylan Gabriel or even shud Or Sanders, I think this

1169
00:58:27.599 --> 00:58:30.559
<v Speaker 2>offense could be really ugly. I think Judkins should still

1170
00:58:30.599 --> 00:58:33.920
<v Speaker 2>be in line for basically all of the carries, because

1171
00:58:33.920 --> 00:58:37.159
<v Speaker 2>that's what they've indicated so far. But fifteen carries on

1172
00:58:37.199 --> 00:58:39.239
<v Speaker 2>a team that's not gonna score a lot of points

1173
00:58:39.239 --> 00:58:42.360
<v Speaker 2>in a minimal passing game role isn't all that enticing

1174
00:58:42.360 --> 00:58:42.960
<v Speaker 2>for fantasy.

1175
00:58:43.760 --> 00:58:46.559
<v Speaker 1>The last thing I want to bring up is Brian

1176
00:58:46.599 --> 00:58:49.119
<v Speaker 1>Dables saying that Tyrone Tracy is expected to miss a

1177
00:58:49.159 --> 00:58:53.719
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. Very interesting that Tyrone Tracy started that Week

1178
00:58:53.760 --> 00:58:58.320
<v Speaker 1>three game, and even though Scattabo really Scatubu really came

1179
00:58:58.360 --> 00:59:01.159
<v Speaker 1>on in week two. Now you can't fight, you know,

1180
00:59:01.239 --> 00:59:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Dable can't can't screw us up with Tyrone Tracy anymore.

1181
00:59:06.440 --> 00:59:10.039
<v Speaker 1>It's skataboo show. I did put in some meager bids

1182
00:59:10.079 --> 00:59:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on Devin Singletary just to get the guy behind the

1183
00:59:12.320 --> 00:59:14.440
<v Speaker 1>guy in New York for some of my deeper leagues.

1184
00:59:15.280 --> 00:59:18.519
<v Speaker 1>But this is very exciting for Camp Scattaboo, and quite frankly,

1185
00:59:19.360 --> 00:59:21.920
<v Speaker 1>when I'm looking at my lineups on Saturday and Sunday morning,

1186
00:59:22.159 --> 00:59:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm breaking ties in favor of Skataboo

1187
00:59:24.960 --> 00:59:27.119
<v Speaker 1>as my flex or as my second running back here,

1188
00:59:27.679 --> 00:59:30.159
<v Speaker 1>especially with Jackson Dart. This is this is really really

1189
00:59:30.159 --> 00:59:32.400
<v Speaker 1>cool to see. I'm pumped for Skataboo here.

1190
00:59:33.320 --> 00:59:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think Scatuboy is definitely a fantasy starter in

1191
00:59:35.880 --> 00:59:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Week four. I think Singletary is going to have some involvement.

1192
00:59:38.920 --> 00:59:42.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Brian day Ball wants Scataboo playing ninety

1193
00:59:42.360 --> 00:59:44.639
<v Speaker 2>percent of snaps like we might see with with some

1194
00:59:44.719 --> 00:59:47.599
<v Speaker 2>of these hir end guys like Campton. As we mentioned previously,

1195
00:59:48.159 --> 00:59:50.239
<v Speaker 2>I think Singletary is still gonna play. But I think

1196
00:59:50.280 --> 00:59:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Scattaboy is gonna be the favorite in all situations. I

1197
00:59:53.760 --> 00:59:55.760
<v Speaker 2>think early downs, light down skull line, I think he's

1198
00:59:55.760 --> 00:59:59.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna be I think he's gonna have an edge over

1199
00:59:59.519 --> 01:00:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Singletary in all three fatts. I think they trust both

1200
01:00:02.519 --> 01:00:04.360
<v Speaker 2>running backs and all three facets, so I don't think

1201
01:00:04.360 --> 01:00:06.480
<v Speaker 2>that it's it's going to be a twenty touch tritcload

1202
01:00:06.480 --> 01:00:09.360
<v Speaker 2>for Scatabu. But I think he's a fantasy starter.

1203
01:00:09.599 --> 01:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, definitely a fantasy storry, especially when you get flex

1204
01:00:11.800 --> 01:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>out to count of two spots in the FFPC. Not

1205
01:00:15.000 --> 01:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>only can you do that on a season long basis,

1206
01:00:16.800 --> 01:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you can do it in the weekly challenge. The f

1207
01:00:18.400 --> 01:00:21.519
<v Speaker 1>FPC Week four Weekly Challenge Live at my ffpc dot

1208
01:00:21.519 --> 01:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>com went up to twenty five hundred dollars, no draft,

1209
01:00:24.239 --> 01:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>no salary cap, just picked ten or twelve players whoever

1210
01:00:27.800 --> 01:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you want on your team. Just can't have multiple players

1211
01:00:29.840 --> 01:00:32.559
<v Speaker 1>from the same team. My FFPC dot com is where

1212
01:00:32.599 --> 01:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to go for that. We will take a very short break.

1213
01:00:35.480 --> 01:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in about a minute and a half

1214
01:00:37.039 --> 01:00:40.039
<v Speaker 1>with our Thursday night football preview. We've talked about a

1215
01:00:40.039 --> 01:00:42.079
<v Speaker 1>lot of these players, but some of them we haven't

1216
01:00:42.079 --> 01:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about. Tory Horton, Elijah Arroyo and FFPC tight end

1217
01:00:46.320 --> 01:00:49.079
<v Speaker 1>premium leagues. What about a Mario de Marcado as far

1218
01:00:49.079 --> 01:00:52.039
<v Speaker 1>as rostering him with James Connor out for the year,

1219
01:00:52.239 --> 01:00:55.119
<v Speaker 1>And we'll talk more about Kyler Murray, Marvin Harrison and

1220
01:00:55.159 --> 01:00:58.159
<v Speaker 1>both defenses tonight, he's Jack Millin from Established the Run

1221
01:00:58.159 --> 01:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>on Eric Balkman. The FFPC Insider Access show rolls on

1222
01:01:01.519 --> 01:01:02.079
<v Speaker 1>right after this.

1223
01:01:02.800 --> 01:01:06.079
<v Speaker 4>Folks, let me talk to you about my favorite weekly

1224
01:01:06.159 --> 01:01:08.920
<v Speaker 4>platform to play on. You know, we all play Dynasty

1225
01:01:09.039 --> 01:01:11.719
<v Speaker 4>and we all play Redraft, but we got to find

1226
01:01:11.719 --> 01:01:15.880
<v Speaker 4>someplace to play weekly, and the FFPC Weekly Challenge is

1227
01:01:15.960 --> 01:01:18.840
<v Speaker 4>my favorite. If you're like me and you're tired of

1228
01:01:19.079 --> 01:01:22.519
<v Speaker 4>the constraints of salary caps, or having to do a

1229
01:01:22.639 --> 01:01:25.719
<v Speaker 4>draft to make a team, or even having to play

1230
01:01:25.760 --> 01:01:28.079
<v Speaker 4>against these people that are stacking up the same team,

1231
01:01:28.159 --> 01:01:30.639
<v Speaker 4>stacking up certain games and you feel like you have

1232
01:01:30.639 --> 01:01:32.599
<v Speaker 4>to put in a million entries or or have to

1233
01:01:32.639 --> 01:01:35.079
<v Speaker 4>have those certain stacks to win, then come play over

1234
01:01:35.119 --> 01:01:39.119
<v Speaker 4>at FFPC. Really, the only main rule that you have

1235
01:01:39.159 --> 01:01:41.800
<v Speaker 4>to deal with is that you cannot select multiple players

1236
01:01:41.840 --> 01:01:43.960
<v Speaker 4>from the same team. I'm going out and I'm trying

1237
01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:46.320
<v Speaker 4>to find the best of the best of the best

1238
01:01:46.320 --> 01:01:48.719
<v Speaker 4>players and put them into a lineup, and that's what

1239
01:01:48.760 --> 01:01:51.559
<v Speaker 4>you can do over at my FFPC. You can go

1240
01:01:51.639 --> 01:01:54.599
<v Speaker 4>out and you can take the number one running back

1241
01:01:54.679 --> 01:01:58.000
<v Speaker 4>in Bijon Robinson, and you can also have Sakwon Barkley

1242
01:01:58.000 --> 01:01:59.559
<v Speaker 4>as long as they're not on the same team. You

1243
01:01:59.599 --> 01:02:01.599
<v Speaker 4>can put the i'm all into a lineup right, and

1244
01:02:01.599 --> 01:02:04.480
<v Speaker 4>there's four flexes for this, so there's a lot of flexibility.

1245
01:02:04.880 --> 01:02:07.840
<v Speaker 4>There's two different contests, one that has kickers and defenses,

1246
01:02:07.960 --> 01:02:11.280
<v Speaker 4>one that's just positioned players. Then you also have a

1247
01:02:11.280 --> 01:02:13.159
<v Speaker 4>bunch of different price points. You can play out thirty

1248
01:02:13.159 --> 01:02:16.119
<v Speaker 4>five dollars, one hundred dollars or two hundred dollars buy

1249
01:02:16.199 --> 01:02:18.599
<v Speaker 4>in and you're going out and you're just picking the

1250
01:02:18.719 --> 01:02:21.599
<v Speaker 4>absolute chalk plays, maybe sneaking in a little bit of

1251
01:02:21.639 --> 01:02:23.920
<v Speaker 4>a sleeper. There's somebody that you think can really blow

1252
01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:26.280
<v Speaker 4>up that week. And that's how it works. It's one

1253
01:02:26.280 --> 01:02:29.719
<v Speaker 4>of the best contests out there for the sharpest gamers,

1254
01:02:29.800 --> 01:02:33.000
<v Speaker 4>and when you win on the FFPC, people take notice.

1255
01:02:33.079 --> 01:02:35.599
<v Speaker 4>That is where the best high stakes games are. That's

1256
01:02:35.639 --> 01:02:38.280
<v Speaker 4>where the best experts play. And that's where I play

1257
01:02:38.360 --> 01:02:41.239
<v Speaker 4>because I want to be an FFPC champion and put

1258
01:02:41.280 --> 01:02:43.599
<v Speaker 4>that title on me, put the money in my pocket

1259
01:02:43.800 --> 01:02:47.199
<v Speaker 4>and put that in my bio FFPC Champion and the

1260
01:02:47.280 --> 01:02:50.679
<v Speaker 4>FFPC Weekly Contest is the best place to play during

1261
01:02:50.719 --> 01:02:51.199
<v Speaker 4>the season.

1262
01:02:52.119 --> 01:02:55.119
<v Speaker 1>Always good to hear from Andrew Cooper from Fantasy Alarm

1263
01:02:55.199 --> 01:02:57.599
<v Speaker 1>and check that out my FFPC dot com. You're home

1264
01:02:57.639 --> 01:03:01.199
<v Speaker 1>for the FFPC Week four Weekly Challenge, twenty five hundred

1265
01:03:01.199 --> 01:03:04.199
<v Speaker 1>dollars at stake, ten thirty hundred team leagues, one player

1266
01:03:04.199 --> 01:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>per team. Just submit your lineup. Easy to do, very

1267
01:03:07.039 --> 01:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>simple to do, and you can check that out right

1268
01:03:09.320 --> 01:03:12.239
<v Speaker 1>now at m y FFPC dot com. Getting into our

1269
01:03:12.280 --> 01:03:16.039
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night football preview here tonight with the Seahawks and Cardinals.

1270
01:03:16.280 --> 01:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>As I'm trying to bring up my prime video right

1271
01:03:18.360 --> 01:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>now talking with Jack Miller at Jack Miller's zero two

1272
01:03:21.880 --> 01:03:24.679
<v Speaker 1>on the X of course, established the run's own Jack

1273
01:03:24.719 --> 01:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that I you know, this is a silly thing for

1274
01:03:27.360 --> 01:03:29.599
<v Speaker 1>me to bring up. I always ask about Twitter handles.

1275
01:03:30.840 --> 01:03:34.599
<v Speaker 1>You're the second Jack Miller, Jack Miller zero two. Was

1276
01:03:34.719 --> 01:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Jack Miller double O taken? Double ow or excuse me,

1277
01:03:37.519 --> 01:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>zero one taken? What's the zero two mean at the end.

1278
01:03:40.880 --> 01:03:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So, as you can imagine, there's there's a lot

1279
01:03:43.039 --> 01:03:45.280
<v Speaker 2>of Jack Miller's out there. It's not the most unique name,

1280
01:03:45.639 --> 01:03:47.639
<v Speaker 2>and so I tried to go with Jack Miller zero

1281
01:03:47.679 --> 01:03:49.719
<v Speaker 2>one because I was born in two thousand and one,

1282
01:03:50.039 --> 01:03:52.800
<v Speaker 2>got it, But that was taken, and so I kind

1283
01:03:52.800 --> 01:03:55.519
<v Speaker 2>of just went up one.

1284
01:03:55.719 --> 01:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Zero two and sometimes it's that easy, and it's that

1285
01:03:58.519 --> 01:04:02.679
<v Speaker 1>simple to understand. Here, let's get into our our our

1286
01:04:03.400 --> 01:04:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night football preview. Here, mister bakes a Lot is

1287
01:04:06.679 --> 01:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>going to lead us off with a starter sick question here.

1288
01:04:09.360 --> 01:04:13.599
<v Speaker 1>He's got a choice between Trevion Henderson and Zach Sharbona tonight.

1289
01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't like either one of these guys tonight at all,

1290
01:04:18.039 --> 01:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, Jack, but I understand, you know the situation

1291
01:04:21.920 --> 01:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that he might be in with the fumbles to Stevenson

1292
01:04:26.199 --> 01:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>and Gibson last week. I think the choice should be

1293
01:04:30.239 --> 01:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Henderson here for both New England and for mister bakes

1294
01:04:33.360 --> 01:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>a Lot. But with Rabel and McDaniel not liking to

1295
01:04:37.719 --> 01:04:41.119
<v Speaker 1>play rookies, I just I don't know, man, I really

1296
01:04:41.119 --> 01:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>don't know what to expect from Henderson now. I know

1297
01:04:43.400 --> 01:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>after the fumble by Gibson he was getting a ton

1298
01:04:46.039 --> 01:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of snaps late. So maybe it's it's Henderson over over

1299
01:04:50.920 --> 01:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>sharbon Ay tonight. But I apologize, mister bakes a Lot,

1300
01:04:54.079 --> 01:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a really good answer for you here.

1301
01:04:56.639 --> 01:04:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's Henderson. I also think the floor

1302
01:04:59.519 --> 01:05:02.840
<v Speaker 2>on both of these guys is really low. We've seen

1303
01:05:03.079 --> 01:05:07.360
<v Speaker 2>before the Ramandre and Antonio Gibson fumbles that the Patriots

1304
01:05:07.400 --> 01:05:10.400
<v Speaker 2>were basically shooting hit Henderson like their every three last week.

1305
01:05:10.760 --> 01:05:13.320
<v Speaker 2>So the floor is low if they just go back

1306
01:05:13.360 --> 01:05:16.400
<v Speaker 2>into that rotation. And then for Sureburney obviously he missed

1307
01:05:16.480 --> 01:05:18.400
<v Speaker 2>last week. I don't think he's gonna be super limited

1308
01:05:18.440 --> 01:05:21.239
<v Speaker 2>since he fully practiced the entire week. But there's always

1309
01:05:21.239 --> 01:05:23.280
<v Speaker 2>some risk with guys coming back from injury that they

1310
01:05:23.320 --> 01:05:25.599
<v Speaker 2>get eased in a little bit. So I think the

1311
01:05:25.639 --> 01:05:29.039
<v Speaker 2>floor is really low. I think Henderson has probably a

1312
01:05:29.119 --> 01:05:30.960
<v Speaker 2>higher ceiling if they do decide to give him this

1313
01:05:31.039 --> 01:05:34.519
<v Speaker 2>backfield in a perfect matchup against this Carolina defense.

1314
01:05:35.360 --> 01:05:41.079
<v Speaker 1>The Seattle offense is what I want to talk about here. First,

1315
01:05:41.800 --> 01:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Donald has really started to come alive the last week

1316
01:05:46.280 --> 01:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>or two. He's gotten progressively better. I think he's rosterble.

1317
01:05:50.559 --> 01:05:53.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually starting him in a league over Jake Browning,

1318
01:05:53.280 --> 01:05:56.199
<v Speaker 1>where my only quarterback prior to week three was Joe Burrow,

1319
01:05:56.480 --> 01:05:59.119
<v Speaker 1>which I screwed that up there, so I picked up

1320
01:05:59.159 --> 01:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>Donald this week. I'm playing him over Browning, but I

1321
01:06:02.159 --> 01:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>think he's more of a super flex play. My concern

1322
01:06:05.199 --> 01:06:08.199
<v Speaker 1>with Donald this year coming in was like, was this

1323
01:06:08.239 --> 01:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>guy just the Kevin O'Connell product. Was Was he a

1324
01:06:10.840 --> 01:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>product of Justin Jefferson, Jordan Addison, TJ Hockinson, all the

1325
01:06:13.840 --> 01:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones and all these guys, And the fact that

1326
01:06:16.840 --> 01:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>he gets Jackson Smith and Jigbub to lean on and

1327
01:06:19.760 --> 01:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I think has been really really good for him. Your

1328
01:06:22.159 --> 01:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>long term outlook on Donald Is this a guy that

1329
01:06:24.639 --> 01:06:27.519
<v Speaker 1>could threaten being a top fifteen quarterback this year or

1330
01:06:27.599 --> 01:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is he buried into like top twenty five.

1331
01:06:30.880 --> 01:06:32.840
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't go as far as top twenty five. I

1332
01:06:32.880 --> 01:06:34.440
<v Speaker 2>don't think he's quite top fifteen.

1333
01:06:34.840 --> 01:06:35.519
<v Speaker 3>I know it was.

1334
01:06:35.760 --> 01:06:38.480
<v Speaker 2>He had a really good last week that was also

1335
01:06:38.960 --> 01:06:42.079
<v Speaker 2>against the Saints, and I think that in an ideal world,

1336
01:06:42.159 --> 01:06:45.119
<v Speaker 2>this offense still wants to lean on the run. So

1337
01:06:45.320 --> 01:06:49.039
<v Speaker 2>I think Donald is like a serviceable QB two, But

1338
01:06:49.320 --> 01:06:51.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's a guy i'd feel awesome trotting

1339
01:06:51.639 --> 01:06:52.920
<v Speaker 2>out in one quarterback leagues.

1340
01:06:53.159 --> 01:06:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, trust me. I feel really crappy about it.

1341
01:06:55.920 --> 01:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't like starting Donald the night at all. This

1342
01:06:59.880 --> 01:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is this is my whole thing, Like I hate quarterbacks

1343
01:07:03.360 --> 01:07:06.519
<v Speaker 1>against single quarterback leagues unless I'm getting a really elite guy,

1344
01:07:06.519 --> 01:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and then I feel like I don't need a backup,

1345
01:07:08.159 --> 01:07:10.719
<v Speaker 1>and clearly, when you have Joe Burrow, you need a backup,

1346
01:07:10.760 --> 01:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't do that. So now it's going to

1347
01:07:12.840 --> 01:07:14.719
<v Speaker 1>be on the arm of Sam Darnold to try to

1348
01:07:14.719 --> 01:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>carry me to victory in week four. The backfield that

1349
01:07:17.920 --> 01:07:20.039
<v Speaker 1>will be behind him Kenneth Walker and Zach Scharbonay. We

1350
01:07:20.119 --> 01:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about these guys tonight. Kenneth Walker had

1351
01:07:22.800 --> 01:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the backfield to himself last week, and obviously the two

1352
01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns helped, but he was very inefficient with his touches.

1353
01:07:28.760 --> 01:07:32.079
<v Speaker 1>Sharbon Ay comes back tonight, He's active. I would imagine

1354
01:07:32.719 --> 01:07:35.119
<v Speaker 1>that he has a significant role. Can you make the

1355
01:07:35.199 --> 01:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>case in the right situation, not necessarily that you'd have

1356
01:07:38.079 --> 01:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>both these guys on the same team, Jack, but if

1357
01:07:40.360 --> 01:07:43.559
<v Speaker 1>you had them on separate teams. Are they both flexible tonight?

1358
01:07:44.840 --> 01:07:48.239
<v Speaker 2>I think Walker is a lot more flexible than Charbonnet.

1359
01:07:48.519 --> 01:07:50.559
<v Speaker 2>Just with Strabonet coming off the injury, I think the

1360
01:07:50.559 --> 01:07:54.239
<v Speaker 2>floor is pretty low. I wouldn't feel awesome about either

1361
01:07:54.280 --> 01:07:56.320
<v Speaker 2>of them because with Walker you do still have the

1362
01:07:56.360 --> 01:07:59.239
<v Speaker 2>fact that Sharboney was ahead in pretty much every usage

1363
01:07:59.280 --> 01:08:02.079
<v Speaker 2>metric during the first two games. I know Walker was

1364
01:08:02.119 --> 01:08:06.480
<v Speaker 2>more effective during those two games. But I mean it's

1365
01:08:06.519 --> 01:08:08.400
<v Speaker 2>I think it's gonna be close to a fifty to

1366
01:08:08.440 --> 01:08:12.480
<v Speaker 2>fifty split again, probably Walker slightly ahead with sharbone coming

1367
01:08:12.519 --> 01:08:15.719
<v Speaker 2>back from an injury. But the Seax also just have

1368
01:08:15.840 --> 01:08:18.119
<v Speaker 2>not thrown the ball to running backs like we're used

1369
01:08:18.159 --> 01:08:20.960
<v Speaker 2>to seeing last year. I don't have their exac running

1370
01:08:20.960 --> 01:08:24.439
<v Speaker 2>back target chair off hand, but it was above league

1371
01:08:24.479 --> 01:08:27.760
<v Speaker 2>average this year. Zach Scharbney doesn't have a target yet,

1372
01:08:27.800 --> 01:08:29.560
<v Speaker 2>even though he's played quite a bit.

1373
01:08:30.560 --> 01:08:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth w that's mind boggling, by the way.

1374
01:08:33.600 --> 01:08:37.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's crazy. And Kenneth Walker had zero targets last week.

1375
01:08:37.800 --> 01:08:40.039
<v Speaker 2>George Hallani I think had a couple of targets, but

1376
01:08:40.039 --> 01:08:42.800
<v Speaker 2>they came from Drew Locke. So I mean, so far

1377
01:08:42.880 --> 01:08:45.720
<v Speaker 2>when Sam Darnold has been the quarterback, this offense just

1378
01:08:45.760 --> 01:08:48.359
<v Speaker 2>has not thrown to running bcks verty much and that's

1379
01:08:48.399 --> 01:08:51.640
<v Speaker 2>obviously pretty bad news for both of them.

1380
01:08:51.880 --> 01:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh starter sick question here from mister bakes a lot.

1381
01:08:55.079 --> 01:08:57.359
<v Speaker 1>This is full PPR. He's got to sit one of

1382
01:08:57.359 --> 01:09:01.399
<v Speaker 1>these guys, Zach Sharmoney Brail and Allen or Tyler Algier.

1383
01:09:01.479 --> 01:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>You have to sit one of these guys for me.

1384
01:09:04.319 --> 01:09:06.159
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Brailen Allen Jack.

1385
01:09:06.880 --> 01:09:10.479
<v Speaker 2>I think it is too obviously you know this, but

1386
01:09:10.560 --> 01:09:13.000
<v Speaker 2>the floor is is really low for for all these

1387
01:09:13.039 --> 01:09:16.039
<v Speaker 2>all of these guys, I think Srebn is the most

1388
01:09:16.119 --> 01:09:20.520
<v Speaker 2>gamescript proof. Braylan Allen and Algier we've seen really have

1389
01:09:20.640 --> 01:09:23.640
<v Speaker 2>their snaps got down in negative game script. I think

1390
01:09:23.680 --> 01:09:29.359
<v Speaker 2>that's more of an issue with the Jets, So it's

1391
01:09:29.399 --> 01:09:30.359
<v Speaker 2>and Braylan.

1392
01:09:30.119 --> 01:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Allen for me, has the the the dustiness of perhaps

1393
01:09:34.800 --> 01:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the non usage from Alvin Kamara that you've seen so far.

1394
01:09:38.520 --> 01:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that enough for you to say Trey Benson over

1395
01:09:41.039 --> 01:09:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Kamara tonight, because that's what JJ Keats is facing right now.

1396
01:09:44.479 --> 01:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Got to figure out whether Tred Benson or Alvin Kamara

1397
01:09:46.640 --> 01:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is the smartest start in Week four.

1398
01:09:48.680 --> 01:09:53.079
<v Speaker 2>I think it's Benson. Kamara just uncharacteristically has not gotten

1399
01:09:53.079 --> 01:09:56.760
<v Speaker 2>targets so far. Game script should keep the Saints from

1400
01:09:56.800 --> 01:09:59.800
<v Speaker 2>getting too many like team running back carrys, and gamescript

1401
01:09:59.800 --> 01:10:02.560
<v Speaker 2>could also get Kamara out of the game early. There's

1402
01:10:02.600 --> 01:10:04.960
<v Speaker 2>just some risk of a quick hook if the Saints.

1403
01:10:05.279 --> 01:10:07.119
<v Speaker 2>If things really go south for the Saints, which with

1404
01:10:07.239 --> 01:10:10.039
<v Speaker 2>a sixteen and a half point spread it very easily could.

1405
01:10:10.880 --> 01:10:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Benson seems more insured in his role. He's gonna get carries,

1406
01:10:15.640 --> 01:10:18.960
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna get targets, even if de Marcado plays.

1407
01:10:18.680 --> 01:10:22.079
<v Speaker 3>A little bit of the passing Dounes. I like Benson here.

1408
01:10:22.399 --> 01:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Dare I say as Alvin Kamara finally I losing a

1409
01:10:25.600 --> 01:10:28.199
<v Speaker 1>step could be per Mar ninety nine saying Kamara has

1410
01:10:28.239 --> 01:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>lost juice out of his brace. That could be a possibility.

1411
01:10:31.720 --> 01:10:33.279
<v Speaker 1>The other one that I want to get to here

1412
01:10:33.439 --> 01:10:37.159
<v Speaker 1>fly Nelly Fly on Twitch, DJ Moore or Trey Benson.

1413
01:10:37.560 --> 01:10:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Moore is at the Las Vegas Right Raiders here with

1414
01:10:40.399 --> 01:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Benson questions tonight. But I'm still rolling

1415
01:10:42.439 --> 01:10:44.079
<v Speaker 1>with Benson here over DJ Moore. Jack.

1416
01:10:44.720 --> 01:10:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this one's Benson for me. DJ Moore's role just

1417
01:10:47.279 --> 01:10:50.319
<v Speaker 2>has not been what it has been in previous years

1418
01:10:50.319 --> 01:10:52.800
<v Speaker 2>and honestly, what I expected it to be going into

1419
01:10:52.800 --> 01:10:55.760
<v Speaker 2>the year. It really seems like Romodunze has taken a

1420
01:10:55.840 --> 01:10:58.199
<v Speaker 2>strong grasp of the wide receiver one role.

1421
01:10:58.279 --> 01:11:00.000
<v Speaker 3>So I like Benson here for sure.

1422
01:11:00.720 --> 01:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm reaching on this next one, but Tory Horton

1423
01:11:03.359 --> 01:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>has actually shown out here both on special teams and

1424
01:11:05.800 --> 01:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>on offense. The last couple of weeks he had no

1425
01:11:08.640 --> 01:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>targets against the Niners in Week one two for thirty

1426
01:11:11.439 --> 01:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>two in a touchdown, in Week two three, for thirty

1427
01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:16.399
<v Speaker 1>two in a touchdown in Week three? Am I stretching

1428
01:11:16.439 --> 01:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to say he might be a flex tonight against Arizona.

1429
01:11:19.880 --> 01:11:22.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a little early for Horton. I do

1430
01:11:22.880 --> 01:11:26.239
<v Speaker 2>like him long term. We've seen Cooper Cup fade over

1431
01:11:26.279 --> 01:11:28.680
<v Speaker 2>the second half of seasons before. He also has an

1432
01:11:28.680 --> 01:11:31.279
<v Speaker 2>injury history. So there's definitely a world in which Horton

1433
01:11:31.399 --> 01:11:33.520
<v Speaker 2>ends up as the wide receiver too for the Seahawks

1434
01:11:33.520 --> 01:11:35.840
<v Speaker 2>over the second half of the year. But right now

1435
01:11:36.000 --> 01:11:39.399
<v Speaker 2>Cup is still pretty locked into that second wide receiver role,

1436
01:11:39.439 --> 01:11:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I think, and so I think Horton is a good hold,

1437
01:11:41.960 --> 01:11:44.199
<v Speaker 2>but probably not yet a good start.

1438
01:11:45.359 --> 01:11:48.479
<v Speaker 1>Permar ninety nine, Tory is a god matter of time, boy,

1439
01:11:48.520 --> 01:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that'd be I hope you're right for my dynasty team's sake,

1440
01:11:51.600 --> 01:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>because I got a lot of Tory Horton in the

1441
01:11:53.439 --> 01:11:55.359
<v Speaker 1>fourth round of rookie drafts this year. We'll see what

1442
01:11:55.399 --> 01:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>happens there. I we'll see what happens at tight end.

1443
01:11:57.920 --> 01:12:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Who would you rather roster the rest of the season.

1444
01:12:00.880 --> 01:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it simply the upside play with Elijah Arroyo, or

1445
01:12:03.840 --> 01:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>would you rather take the veteran in AJ Barner who's

1446
01:12:06.880 --> 01:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>been getting out there. I guess Arroyo has been making

1447
01:12:09.199 --> 01:12:11.399
<v Speaker 1>some waves a little bit the last week or two.

1448
01:12:11.720 --> 01:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>But what would you think here, Jack? Are you just

1449
01:12:13.800 --> 01:12:15.319
<v Speaker 1>simply going with the upside with Arroyo.

1450
01:12:16.079 --> 01:12:18.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's the upside for me, just I know Barner

1451
01:12:18.359 --> 01:12:20.479
<v Speaker 2>is the better role right now, but I don't think

1452
01:12:20.520 --> 01:12:24.319
<v Speaker 2>either these roles are particularly enticing, and this is kind

1453
01:12:24.359 --> 01:12:27.279
<v Speaker 2>of AJ Barner's role while Arroyo is still getting his

1454
01:12:27.319 --> 01:12:31.000
<v Speaker 2>feet right in the NFL. So I definitely prefer the upside,

1455
01:12:31.039 --> 01:12:34.199
<v Speaker 2>which I mean it might not materialize. He's not as

1456
01:12:34.239 --> 01:12:37.479
<v Speaker 2>good of a blocker as Barner, and I think the

1457
01:12:37.520 --> 01:12:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Seahawks offense really values that. So I don't know about

1458
01:12:40.720 --> 01:12:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the probability of Arroyo actually hitting, but if I had

1459
01:12:43.520 --> 01:12:45.640
<v Speaker 2>to pick one, it's it's definitely Royo, just as an

1460
01:12:45.680 --> 01:12:46.399
<v Speaker 2>upside shot.

1461
01:12:46.720 --> 01:12:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for the guys in the end of your e bench,

1462
01:12:48.239 --> 01:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>you always want the upside there, So for me, it's

1463
01:12:50.119 --> 01:12:53.399
<v Speaker 1>it's totally a Royo. This is an interesting one from

1464
01:12:53.439 --> 01:12:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Flying Elly Fly, Tory Horton or Sterling Shepard this week.

1465
01:12:57.760 --> 01:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't obviously, as you'll point out, shortly both low

1466
01:13:00.720 --> 01:13:03.039
<v Speaker 1>floors here. But we don't know what's going on with Tampa.

1467
01:13:03.119 --> 01:13:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Evans not expected to play. We know I BUCA is

1468
01:13:05.319 --> 01:13:07.479
<v Speaker 1>stand up, and what's going on with Chris Godwin, Because

1469
01:13:07.479 --> 01:13:09.479
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't play, all of a sudden, Shepherd looks

1470
01:13:09.520 --> 01:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot better. He's got to make the decision in

1471
01:13:11.560 --> 01:13:13.159
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of minutes. Horton or Shepherd.

1472
01:13:13.199 --> 01:13:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Jack. Yeah, I think I go Shepherd. I don't feel

1473
01:13:18.720 --> 01:13:22.079
<v Speaker 2>awesome recommending sterling Shepherd in the year twenty twenty five,

1474
01:13:22.119 --> 01:13:26.439
<v Speaker 2>but Evans is obviously out. Godwin didn't practice today. The

1475
01:13:26.479 --> 01:13:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Bucks are saying it's precautionary, so I'm not going to

1476
01:13:28.960 --> 01:13:31.079
<v Speaker 2>read too much in it up until I see his

1477
01:13:31.720 --> 01:13:34.920
<v Speaker 2>practice status for tomorrow. I think he's gonna play, but

1478
01:13:35.439 --> 01:13:37.439
<v Speaker 2>it was such a serious injuries miss so much time,

1479
01:13:37.520 --> 01:13:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I can't imagine he's anything close to a full role,

1480
01:13:41.000 --> 01:13:43.399
<v Speaker 2>and he's probably not like his usual self from an

1481
01:13:43.399 --> 01:13:46.399
<v Speaker 2>efficiency standpoint either. So I think Shepherd is probably the

1482
01:13:46.439 --> 01:13:49.159
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver two for this Tampa offense in week four,

1483
01:13:49.199 --> 01:13:50.720
<v Speaker 2>and so I go Shepherd.

1484
01:13:51.680 --> 01:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>We're coming up on kickoff here, so I want to

1485
01:13:53.680 --> 01:13:55.199
<v Speaker 1>get this last thing in and then I want to

1486
01:13:55.239 --> 01:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>expand this out to some more of a wide scoping

1487
01:13:58.520 --> 01:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>questions Onyler, Murray, Marvin Harrison, Trade Benson, so on, and

1488
01:14:03.000 --> 01:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>so forth. The defenses tonight for those who are looking

1489
01:14:06.720 --> 01:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>at streaming like me, and when it comes to Seattle

1490
01:14:09.920 --> 01:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona, I actually have both of these teams going,

1491
01:14:12.640 --> 01:14:16.039
<v Speaker 1>both of these defenses going in a few different leagues tonight.

1492
01:14:16.359 --> 01:14:18.039
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a feeling like, what's your take on

1493
01:14:18.119 --> 01:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>starting Seattle or the Arizona defense tonight? As far as

1494
01:14:20.720 --> 01:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>streaming goes for defenses.

1495
01:14:23.159 --> 01:14:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think both are fine. The total is not

1496
01:14:24.800 --> 01:14:28.840
<v Speaker 2>too high. I prefer Seattle just because it's a better defense.

1497
01:14:29.159 --> 01:14:31.920
<v Speaker 2>The Seahawks are also very small favorite, so the Panther

1498
01:14:32.119 --> 01:14:38.520
<v Speaker 2>or the Colonels are implied for marginally fewer points. But yeah,

1499
01:14:38.680 --> 01:14:41.079
<v Speaker 2>I think both are fine in a low total game.

1500
01:14:41.079 --> 01:14:43.319
<v Speaker 2>That could be kind of a slog, but I prefer

1501
01:14:43.439 --> 01:14:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Seattle if if I was given the option.

1502
01:14:46.319 --> 01:14:49.039
<v Speaker 1>Your two screen experience is about to start, Jack and

1503
01:14:49.079 --> 01:14:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I will take you through the first quarter here tonight.

1504
01:14:51.640 --> 01:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Let you know what's going on with fantasy takes on

1505
01:14:54.000 --> 01:14:57.279
<v Speaker 1>each and every drive and play tonight. As the Seahawks

1506
01:14:57.319 --> 01:14:59.479
<v Speaker 1>and Cardinals set to kick off in just a couple

1507
01:14:59.560 --> 01:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of minutes speaking of these two teams. I think I've

1508
01:15:03.039 --> 01:15:05.279
<v Speaker 1>delved into everything I want to talk about with Seattle,

1509
01:15:05.680 --> 01:15:09.119
<v Speaker 1>but the Cardinals I think are conundrum right now. Man

1510
01:15:09.199 --> 01:15:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Like Kyler Murray. There there's been people, it seems like

1511
01:15:12.279 --> 01:15:14.479
<v Speaker 1>people in the industry, people have talked to high stakes

1512
01:15:14.479 --> 01:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>players I've talked to seemingly since twenty twenty three, they

1513
01:15:18.880 --> 01:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>have said, I'm out on Kyler Murray. I'm just done that.

1514
01:15:21.840 --> 01:15:24.079
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the best of him, We've seen what he

1515
01:15:24.159 --> 01:15:26.199
<v Speaker 1>can do, and I just don't envision him taking this

1516
01:15:26.279 --> 01:15:29.039
<v Speaker 1>next step forward here tonight or this year. I should say.

1517
01:15:30.199 --> 01:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray said before the start of the season that

1518
01:15:32.680 --> 01:15:34.119
<v Speaker 1>he was going to run more this year, which I

1519
01:15:34.199 --> 01:15:36.119
<v Speaker 1>think I'd have to check the stats. I think he

1520
01:15:36.159 --> 01:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>has been running a little bit more. But a lot

1521
01:15:38.640 --> 01:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of the same stuff we've been saying about Kyler Murray

1522
01:15:41.600 --> 01:15:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years, we're saying again already in

1523
01:15:44.239 --> 01:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five here in late September, is this deja

1524
01:15:47.960 --> 01:15:50.039
<v Speaker 1>vous again for Kyler Murray that he's just going to

1525
01:15:50.119 --> 01:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>be this type of player that has this tannelizing upside

1526
01:15:53.720 --> 01:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but just never seems to deliver on it. From a

1527
01:15:56.039 --> 01:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>fantasy standpoint.

1528
01:15:57.920 --> 01:16:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think we know what Kyler Murray is at

1529
01:16:00.720 --> 01:16:03.520
<v Speaker 2>this point, and I think it's a top twelve fantasy quarterback.

1530
01:16:03.560 --> 01:16:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a usable fantasy quarterback and someone that

1531
01:16:06.600 --> 01:16:08.640
<v Speaker 2>should be rostered in pretty much every league. But I

1532
01:16:08.640 --> 01:16:11.720
<v Speaker 2>don't think he's gonna ever challenge a Lamar Jackson and

1533
01:16:11.800 --> 01:16:15.239
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen for really the upper echelon of fantasy quarterbacking.

1534
01:16:15.760 --> 01:16:17.600
<v Speaker 2>With that being said, I think that's okay. Like I

1535
01:16:17.640 --> 01:16:20.880
<v Speaker 2>think most of the guys around him, like Patrick Mahomes,

1536
01:16:20.920 --> 01:16:23.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't think is ever gonna challenge those guys. Again,

1537
01:16:24.359 --> 01:16:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Jared Goff, Like, there's so many guys

1538
01:16:26.600 --> 01:16:30.159
<v Speaker 2>who are fine fantasy starters who just don't have the

1539
01:16:30.239 --> 01:16:33.560
<v Speaker 2>upside to challenge the elites, just because the elites at

1540
01:16:33.600 --> 01:16:36.159
<v Speaker 2>quarterback are so good now with how much they run.

1541
01:16:36.920 --> 01:16:39.239
<v Speaker 2>Kyler is running a little bit more this year, or

1542
01:16:39.279 --> 01:16:41.439
<v Speaker 2>at least they're designing a little more for him this year.

1543
01:16:41.760 --> 01:16:44.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure on the scrambles exactly, but his designed

1544
01:16:44.439 --> 01:16:47.520
<v Speaker 2>run rate is up. So Yeah, I think Kyler's a

1545
01:16:47.880 --> 01:16:50.600
<v Speaker 2>find fantasy starter. I don't think he has like top

1546
01:16:50.640 --> 01:16:52.880
<v Speaker 2>three upside, and.

1547
01:16:52.840 --> 01:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>There's value in that as you pointed out, you know,

1548
01:16:55.840 --> 01:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>for people who like waiting on quarterbacks, who don't want

1549
01:16:58.560 --> 01:17:01.119
<v Speaker 1>to invest in quarterbacks in single quarterback leagues, I think

1550
01:17:01.159 --> 01:17:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray is a perfect quarterback to have on your team,

1551
01:17:03.479 --> 01:17:05.479
<v Speaker 1>where if you don't have a better matchup this week,

1552
01:17:05.840 --> 01:17:09.079
<v Speaker 1>chances are because of Mark Murray's running ability, he's going

1553
01:17:09.159 --> 01:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to provide you with a nice fantasy floor. So that

1554
01:17:11.840 --> 01:17:16.479
<v Speaker 1>makes sense there. Let's go to Marvin Harrison next, who

1555
01:17:16.600 --> 01:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>just first played from scrimmage. He catches an eight yard

1556
01:17:19.159 --> 01:17:22.319
<v Speaker 1>pass from Kyler Murray. So Harrison obviously off on the

1557
01:17:22.359 --> 01:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>right foot, little wide wide receiver screen as he gets

1558
01:17:25.359 --> 01:17:27.239
<v Speaker 1>out of bounds, and oh my god, Jack, do you

1559
01:17:27.279 --> 01:17:29.039
<v Speaker 1>have this game on right now? Are you watching this?

1560
01:17:32.239 --> 01:17:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Hold on? You might be on mute or your or you're.

1561
01:17:34.560 --> 01:17:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh sorry, I was, I was on mute. I'm not

1562
01:17:37.680 --> 01:17:40.199
<v Speaker 2>watching it, Okay, I don't. I don't have the TV,

1563
01:17:40.279 --> 01:17:42.760
<v Speaker 2>but I have the ESPN game cast up perfect.

1564
01:17:42.960 --> 01:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>But the reason I bring this up the Cardinals are

1565
01:17:45.600 --> 01:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>wearing these all white uniforms, white helmets, red socks, and

1566
01:17:49.960 --> 01:17:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals it's got this beautiful tinge of like red

1567
01:17:53.920 --> 01:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and orange, like it's it's really appealing to the eye.

1568
01:17:56.600 --> 01:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe I'm just off base on this, but I

1569
01:17:58.680 --> 01:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's really really cool. Trey McBride catching a pass

1570
01:18:02.560 --> 01:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>here on second down four a first down?

1571
01:18:06.439 --> 01:18:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, oh sorry, have they shown the end zones yet?

1572
01:18:10.680 --> 01:18:13.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, like what the theme is tonight for Arizona,

1573
01:18:13.279 --> 01:18:16.439
<v Speaker 2>but I they painted the end zones pretty like special too,

1574
01:18:16.479 --> 01:18:18.840
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know. I don't know what the occasion is,

1575
01:18:18.840 --> 01:18:22.399
<v Speaker 2>but it's they're they're doing something different and it looks

1576
01:18:22.399 --> 01:18:22.920
<v Speaker 2>pretty cool.

1577
01:18:23.399 --> 01:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>The uh the the the logo at midfield is pretty cool.

1578
01:18:27.239 --> 01:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>The logo at midfield is the same logo as as

1579
01:18:31.439 --> 01:18:33.159
<v Speaker 1>what's on the helmet right now. And you're right, I

1580
01:18:33.199 --> 01:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>have not seen the end zones yet. As Trey Benson

1581
01:18:35.800 --> 01:18:38.039
<v Speaker 1>rushes for no gain on on first and tent, I

1582
01:18:38.039 --> 01:18:40.279
<v Speaker 1>have not seen the end zones, uh to see what

1583
01:18:40.319 --> 01:18:43.079
<v Speaker 1>they're doing there, But yeah, it's it's it's very esthetically

1584
01:18:43.119 --> 01:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>a pleasing, pleasing to the eye. Yes, I'm looking at

1585
01:18:46.479 --> 01:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. It's got the star with the rays coming

1586
01:18:50.000 --> 01:18:52.039
<v Speaker 1>out of it, the red and orange rays coming out.

1587
01:18:52.079 --> 01:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>It's very cool. Uh So anybody who is blind, my apologies,

1588
01:18:57.680 --> 01:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you will not enjoy this game to the full effect tonight,

1589
01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>because it is very cool what we're seeing here tonight

1590
01:19:02.560 --> 01:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>with the Cardinals and Seahawks. Okay, Kyler Murray a three

1591
01:19:06.199 --> 01:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>yard carry and it is second and ten from the

1592
01:19:09.960 --> 01:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Arizona forty one. I beg your pardon. It is third

1593
01:19:12.439 --> 01:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and seven from the Arizona forty four. As the Cardinals

1594
01:19:14.960 --> 01:19:18.039
<v Speaker 1>try to keep this drive going, Marvin Harrison catches this

1595
01:19:18.199 --> 01:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>pass on the first play from scrimmage for eight yards.

1596
01:19:22.560 --> 01:19:25.319
<v Speaker 1>What's wrong with him? Jack? You know, I felt like

1597
01:19:25.479 --> 01:19:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the early part of drafting season, I spent a good

1598
01:19:28.359 --> 01:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>part my podcast explaining away Harrison. You know, we expected

1599
01:19:33.720 --> 01:19:37.079
<v Speaker 1>too much year one. They misused him in his rookie year.

1600
01:19:37.640 --> 01:19:41.199
<v Speaker 1>The schedule gets easier in year two, you know, all

1601
01:19:41.239 --> 01:19:43.479
<v Speaker 1>these things. And I feel like over the course of

1602
01:19:43.479 --> 01:19:46.279
<v Speaker 1>the three or four weeks of the season, all these

1603
01:19:46.279 --> 01:19:50.199
<v Speaker 1>things are still true. Anybody who was against Marvin Harrison

1604
01:19:50.199 --> 01:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>this year would have told you that the Cardinals did

1605
01:19:52.920 --> 01:19:56.479
<v Speaker 1>nothing to change anything that would make it better for

1606
01:19:56.600 --> 01:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Harrison this year, That would, you know, even make

1607
01:19:59.880 --> 01:20:02.319
<v Speaker 1>it different. Like everything stayed the same, So why should

1608
01:20:02.359 --> 01:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>we expect anything different? And I think through three weeks

1609
01:20:07.279 --> 01:20:10.279
<v Speaker 1>that that's largely been true. But I think you can

1610
01:20:10.399 --> 01:20:12.439
<v Speaker 1>make a case that there's other stuff going on. I mean,

1611
01:20:12.479 --> 01:20:14.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how we dropped that pass last week,

1612
01:20:14.520 --> 01:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>that wide open pass that certainly if he catches that,

1613
01:20:17.600 --> 01:20:20.079
<v Speaker 1>we have a much more different narrative we're talking about

1614
01:20:20.359 --> 01:20:23.279
<v Speaker 1>in our Week four previews. But he didn't catch it,

1615
01:20:23.359 --> 01:20:27.079
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, we're down on Harrison again. Can

1616
01:20:27.119 --> 01:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you offer up anything positive Harrison? And conversely, maybe this

1617
01:20:33.159 --> 01:20:35.079
<v Speaker 1>is just who he is. I don't know your thoughts

1618
01:20:35.119 --> 01:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>on Harrison.

1619
01:20:36.319 --> 01:20:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't really know either. And everyone saw the

1620
01:20:38.840 --> 01:20:41.000
<v Speaker 2>wide open drop. There would have been a big game

1621
01:20:41.039 --> 01:20:43.000
<v Speaker 2>if not a touchdown. But he also had another drop

1622
01:20:43.119 --> 01:20:45.560
<v Speaker 2>that was maybe a little bit more difficult, but it

1623
01:20:45.560 --> 01:20:48.640
<v Speaker 2>would have been a long touchdown. The play didn't count

1624
01:20:48.680 --> 01:20:52.520
<v Speaker 2>because some other Cardinals receiver. I assume it was like

1625
01:20:52.560 --> 01:20:56.119
<v Speaker 2>Michael Wilson or something got interfered with. But Wilson had

1626
01:20:56.279 --> 01:20:59.760
<v Speaker 2>an easy touchdown go through his hands too. I can't

1627
01:20:59.760 --> 01:21:02.119
<v Speaker 2>really explain it. I mean, I don't want to speculate

1628
01:21:02.159 --> 01:21:02.479
<v Speaker 2>too much.

1629
01:21:02.560 --> 01:21:03.319
<v Speaker 3>Is he hurt?

1630
01:21:03.439 --> 01:21:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Is is it mental? At this point, I don't really know.

1631
01:21:07.680 --> 01:21:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess the positives are that while he has not

1632
01:21:10.960 --> 01:21:16.079
<v Speaker 2>shown like top tier upside, the volume is still respectable.

1633
01:21:16.159 --> 01:21:20.039
<v Speaker 2>He had a twenty one percent target share as a rookie.

1634
01:21:20.159 --> 01:21:24.479
<v Speaker 2>He's at nineteen percent through three games this year. I mean,

1635
01:21:24.520 --> 01:21:28.399
<v Speaker 2>that's still fine volume. It's just not what was expected

1636
01:21:28.399 --> 01:21:32.159
<v Speaker 2>of him coming out of college hyped. Is this generational

1637
01:21:32.279 --> 01:21:35.760
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver prospect like he's still a usable fantasy asset.

1638
01:21:35.800 --> 01:21:38.079
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just we were hoping you'd take a

1639
01:21:38.079 --> 01:21:40.479
<v Speaker 2>step forward in through three games. We haven't seen it yet.

1640
01:21:42.039 --> 01:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>The running back situation changed from Week three to week

1641
01:21:46.039 --> 01:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>four here with Trey Benson now coming up to be

1642
01:21:50.319 --> 01:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the lead running back, guys like Amar De Marcado, Bam Knight,

1643
01:21:55.920 --> 01:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Michael Carter falling in behind him. Our best wishes go

1644
01:21:58.840 --> 01:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>out to James Connor for a and speedy recovery. Think

1645
01:22:01.560 --> 01:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>about everything that guy's been through in his life, you know,

1646
01:22:04.800 --> 01:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>having this ankle injury is probably nothing for him, you know,

1647
01:22:07.520 --> 01:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>so he's going to fight through it and hopefully get

1648
01:22:09.520 --> 01:22:12.199
<v Speaker 1>back on the field for Week one next year. You

1649
01:22:12.319 --> 01:22:15.319
<v Speaker 1>had some interesting things to say about Trey Benson on

1650
01:22:15.399 --> 01:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the Established the Run, Updated one Remaining, Updated one fifty

1651
01:22:20.000 --> 01:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast that came out this week. And I think this

1652
01:22:23.039 --> 01:22:26.479
<v Speaker 1>is a precient for anybody thinking that you know it's

1653
01:22:26.520 --> 01:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Trey Bell, Trey Benson Belkow season. Yeah, it could be,

1654
01:22:30.520 --> 01:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but there's some other things to take into account before

1655
01:22:34.039 --> 01:22:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we just all of a sudden annoyed Benson. Is this

1656
01:22:35.680 --> 01:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>guy that's going to be getting all these targets, all

1657
01:22:38.159 --> 01:22:39.880
<v Speaker 1>these snaps and all this fantasy production.

1658
01:22:41.159 --> 01:22:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm actually curious.

1659
01:22:42.640 --> 01:22:45.600
<v Speaker 2>It's I haven't had a play update, but it's third

1660
01:22:45.600 --> 01:22:48.119
<v Speaker 2>and seven for the Cardinals right now. Is it Benson

1661
01:22:48.199 --> 01:22:49.279
<v Speaker 2>out there or is.

1662
01:22:49.279 --> 01:22:52.319
<v Speaker 1>It I'll interrupt? Is it the play happened a long

1663
01:22:52.359 --> 01:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>time ago. I don't I have the ESPN thing up too.

1664
01:22:54.600 --> 01:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why it's not updating Murray. I didn't

1665
01:22:57.159 --> 01:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>see who the running back was. Murray threw a deep pass,

1666
01:23:00.399 --> 01:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of like an out, a deep out or deep

1667
01:23:02.520 --> 01:23:05.279
<v Speaker 1>slant to I think it was Michael Wilson. It was

1668
01:23:05.319 --> 01:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>incomplete and they have punted, and now Darnold is taking

1669
01:23:09.479 --> 01:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>over for the Seahawks. But I did not see what

1670
01:23:11.920 --> 01:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>running back was out there on third and low got it.

1671
01:23:15.079 --> 01:23:18.800
<v Speaker 2>I think Nathan Yankee, the PFF guy who's really good

1672
01:23:18.800 --> 01:23:21.119
<v Speaker 2>with the snappens. It was de Mercatto out there on

1673
01:23:21.239 --> 01:23:27.600
<v Speaker 2>third down. Previously we had seen the Cardinals use Benson

1674
01:23:27.720 --> 01:23:29.319
<v Speaker 2>on third down, and so that was kind of the

1675
01:23:29.399 --> 01:23:31.359
<v Speaker 2>upside case for him. That was why I was pretty

1676
01:23:31.359 --> 01:23:34.039
<v Speaker 2>bullsh on him after week one. I thought, they're finally

1677
01:23:34.079 --> 01:23:36.159
<v Speaker 2>using Benson on third down. If James Connor goes down,

1678
01:23:36.199 --> 01:23:37.760
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, we've got a three down workload.

1679
01:23:38.039 --> 01:23:40.960
<v Speaker 2>It seems like Arizona wants to involve two running backs regardless.

1680
01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:43.359
<v Speaker 2>So I think now that Benson is in the Connor role,

1681
01:23:43.720 --> 01:23:46.000
<v Speaker 2>de Mercado is going to be in the role that

1682
01:23:46.119 --> 01:23:49.800
<v Speaker 2>was previously Benson's role. I do think Benson has a

1683
01:23:49.840 --> 01:23:55.359
<v Speaker 2>better role than Connor had because De Mercado's gonna dear, yeah,

1684
01:23:55.359 --> 01:23:58.359
<v Speaker 2>and De Marcanto's gonna take fewer carries from Benson than

1685
01:23:58.359 --> 01:24:01.199
<v Speaker 2>Benson was taking from Connor. So it's a great role

1686
01:24:01.239 --> 01:24:03.800
<v Speaker 2>for Benson. I don't think it's like a three down

1687
01:24:04.520 --> 01:24:07.640
<v Speaker 2>role like we might see from Jonathan Taylor, McCaffrey, o

1688
01:24:07.680 --> 01:24:12.119
<v Speaker 2>Marion Hampton, but it's still a strong role. But I

1689
01:24:12.159 --> 01:24:14.880
<v Speaker 2>think Dean Marcatto is pretty much confined into that into

1690
01:24:14.880 --> 01:24:15.760
<v Speaker 2>that past game role.

1691
01:24:15.800 --> 01:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Now, Kenneth Walker no gain on first down and then

1692
01:24:19.760 --> 01:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a Kenneth Walker screen catch for twenty nine yards. Jackson

1693
01:24:23.880 --> 01:24:27.079
<v Speaker 1>Smith the Jigba follows up with a two yard catch

1694
01:24:27.359 --> 01:24:30.479
<v Speaker 1>from uh Sam Darnold second and eight now from the

1695
01:24:30.600 --> 01:24:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Seattle forty five as they are trying to make some

1696
01:24:33.439 --> 01:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>headway down the field. So if you were trying to

1697
01:24:36.119 --> 01:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>get the guy behind, the guy, is de Marcado the guy?

1698
01:24:39.640 --> 01:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're not you know, you're not going after

1699
01:24:41.560 --> 01:24:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Michael Carter, You're not going after Bam Knight or anything

1700
01:24:44.359 --> 01:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>like that. If if anything were to happen to Benson

1701
01:24:47.600 --> 01:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>as it stands right now, de Marcado would would probably

1702
01:24:50.800 --> 01:24:53.319
<v Speaker 1>be the guy in obviously what would be a time share,

1703
01:24:53.359 --> 01:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>but he'd be getting the lion's share of the snaps.

1704
01:24:54.960 --> 01:24:58.079
<v Speaker 2>I would think, I think it's I think it's tough

1705
01:24:58.119 --> 01:25:01.880
<v Speaker 2>to tell. I think that might just like Demercato as

1706
01:25:01.920 --> 01:25:05.079
<v Speaker 2>the pass down guy. If Benson goes down, I could

1707
01:25:05.079 --> 01:25:10.119
<v Speaker 2>see Bam Knight and Michael Carter splitting the early down stuff,

1708
01:25:10.119 --> 01:25:12.119
<v Speaker 2>and De Miccado probably gets an uptick in that area,

1709
01:25:12.159 --> 01:25:14.039
<v Speaker 2>but I don't really think it would be enough to

1710
01:25:14.039 --> 01:25:17.439
<v Speaker 2>make him a fantasy starter. So if Benson goes down,

1711
01:25:17.960 --> 01:25:19.840
<v Speaker 2>I think it would kind of be like a really

1712
01:25:19.840 --> 01:25:21.920
<v Speaker 2>messy three way split for touches there.

1713
01:25:22.199 --> 01:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And maybe Wheels up for Harrison McBride and Wilson at

1714
01:25:25.920 --> 01:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that point too, so we will see what happens with that.

1715
01:25:29.199 --> 01:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So that is your preview of the Seahawks and Cardinals

1716
01:25:32.039 --> 01:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>ten to seventeen to go in the first quarter. It

1717
01:25:34.920 --> 01:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is now a third down that the Seahawks are facing

1718
01:25:37.880 --> 01:25:41.039
<v Speaker 1>after a three yard loss from Kenneth Walker on a

1719
01:25:41.039 --> 01:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>play that was blown up in the middle by that

1720
01:25:43.760 --> 01:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals defensive line. Third and ten. Now beg your pardon

1721
01:25:46.640 --> 01:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>as we tick under ten minutes to go in the

1722
01:25:48.880 --> 01:25:52.439
<v Speaker 1>first quarter. We'll have full coverage of this game for

1723
01:25:52.520 --> 01:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you here through the remainder of the show, which my god,

1724
01:25:54.680 --> 01:25:56.199
<v Speaker 1>we only got about half hour left and got a

1725
01:25:56.199 --> 01:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>ton of start sits yet for everybody tonight, I want

1726
01:25:58.880 --> 01:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to remind everybody the ff PC Weekly Challenge is live

1727
01:26:01.840 --> 01:26:04.279
<v Speaker 1>right now. You cannot play in the Thursday Weekly Challenge

1728
01:26:04.279 --> 01:26:07.039
<v Speaker 1>anymore because the Thursday Night game started. However, we do

1729
01:26:07.119 --> 01:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>have a Sunday game going on right now that will

1730
01:26:10.800 --> 01:26:15.239
<v Speaker 1>lock at one pm Eastern time. You are looking at

1731
01:26:15.239 --> 01:26:18.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty five hundred dollars. Is the big money that you

1732
01:26:18.239 --> 01:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>can win this week ten thirty one hundred team contests,

1733
01:26:21.079 --> 01:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>depending upon what you want to play in there. Just

1734
01:26:23.199 --> 01:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>pick ten players, or if you want to play with

1735
01:26:24.800 --> 01:26:29.039
<v Speaker 1>kickers and defenses, you can pick twelve players. No duplications

1736
01:26:29.079 --> 01:26:31.079
<v Speaker 1>on teams. If you want Aaron Rodgers, you can't have

1737
01:26:31.159 --> 01:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Warren. If you want Justin Jefferson, you can have

1738
01:26:33.840 --> 01:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Mason. My FFPC dot com is where to go

1739
01:26:36.800 --> 01:26:42.279
<v Speaker 1>for that, my FFPC dot com. The Seahawks have converted

1740
01:26:42.399 --> 01:26:45.199
<v Speaker 1>on I beg your pardon. They did not convert on

1741
01:26:45.319 --> 01:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>third down. It was a ten yard catch by Tory

1742
01:26:48.920 --> 01:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Horton from Sam Donald. They go for it on fourth

1743
01:26:51.760 --> 01:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>and one and Zach Charbonay is stuffed for no gain.

1744
01:26:55.199 --> 01:26:57.880
<v Speaker 1>As the Cardinals now take over from their own forty

1745
01:26:57.920 --> 01:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>eight nine oh two to the first quarter, They're gonna

1746
01:27:00.039 --> 01:27:01.640
<v Speaker 1>take a break on Prime video. We're going to take

1747
01:27:01.640 --> 01:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a break right here. We'll be back before they are

1748
01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>answering your starting SIIT questions right here on the Better

1749
01:27:07.119 --> 01:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Sports Network. It is FFPC Insider Access with Eric Baldman

1750
01:27:10.600 --> 01:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and Jack Miller from Established to the Run. Don't go anywhere.

1751
01:27:13.600 --> 01:27:15.479
<v Speaker 1>We're helping you out for your week four teams.

1752
01:27:15.600 --> 01:27:18.600
<v Speaker 4>Right after this, folks, let me talk to you about

1753
01:27:18.680 --> 01:27:21.600
<v Speaker 4>my favorite weekly platform to play on. You know, we

1754
01:27:21.640 --> 01:27:25.199
<v Speaker 4>all play Dynasty and we all play Redraft, but we

1755
01:27:25.319 --> 01:27:28.560
<v Speaker 4>got to find someplace to play weekly, and the FFPC

1756
01:27:28.640 --> 01:27:32.079
<v Speaker 4>Weekly Challenge is my favorite. If you're like me and

1757
01:27:32.119 --> 01:27:36.279
<v Speaker 4>you're tired of the constraints of salary caps, or having

1758
01:27:36.279 --> 01:27:39.119
<v Speaker 4>to do a draft to make a team, or even

1759
01:27:39.319 --> 01:27:41.479
<v Speaker 4>having to play against these people that are stacking up

1760
01:27:41.520 --> 01:27:44.439
<v Speaker 4>the same team, stacking up certain games and you feel

1761
01:27:44.439 --> 01:27:46.039
<v Speaker 4>like you have to put in a million entries or

1762
01:27:46.279 --> 01:27:48.560
<v Speaker 4>or have to have those certain stacks to win, then

1763
01:27:48.640 --> 01:27:52.239
<v Speaker 4>come play over at f FPC. Really, the only main

1764
01:27:52.359 --> 01:27:54.279
<v Speaker 4>rule that you have to deal with is that you

1765
01:27:54.359 --> 01:27:57.279
<v Speaker 4>cannot select multiple players from the same team. I'm going

1766
01:27:57.319 --> 01:27:59.520
<v Speaker 4>out and I'm trying to find the best of the

1767
01:27:59.560 --> 01:28:02.119
<v Speaker 4>best the best players and put them into a lineup,

1768
01:28:02.359 --> 01:28:04.439
<v Speaker 4>and that's what you can do over at my FFPC.

1769
01:28:05.239 --> 01:28:07.560
<v Speaker 4>You can go out and you can take the number

1770
01:28:07.600 --> 01:28:11.159
<v Speaker 4>one running back in Bijon Robinson, and you can also

1771
01:28:11.199 --> 01:28:12.800
<v Speaker 4>have steak On Barkley. As long as they're not on

1772
01:28:12.840 --> 01:28:15.560
<v Speaker 4>the same team. You can put them all into a lineup, right,

1773
01:28:15.600 --> 01:28:17.760
<v Speaker 4>And there's four flexes for this, so there's a lot

1774
01:28:17.760 --> 01:28:21.319
<v Speaker 4>of flexibility. There's two different contests, one that has kickers

1775
01:28:21.319 --> 01:28:25.199
<v Speaker 4>and defenses, one that's just positioned players. Then you also

1776
01:28:25.239 --> 01:28:26.760
<v Speaker 4>have a bunch of different price points. You can play

1777
01:28:26.800 --> 01:28:29.760
<v Speaker 4>at thirty five dollars, one hundred dollars or two hundred

1778
01:28:29.760 --> 01:28:32.079
<v Speaker 4>dollars buy in and you're going out and you're just

1779
01:28:32.119 --> 01:28:35.560
<v Speaker 4>picking the absolute chalk plays, maybe sneaking in a little

1780
01:28:35.560 --> 01:28:37.239
<v Speaker 4>bit of a sleeper. There's somebody that you think can

1781
01:28:37.279 --> 01:28:39.800
<v Speaker 4>really blow up that week. And that's how it works.

1782
01:28:39.880 --> 01:28:42.880
<v Speaker 4>It's one of the best contests out there for the

1783
01:28:42.960 --> 01:28:46.319
<v Speaker 4>sharpest gamers. And when you win on the FFPC, people

1784
01:28:46.399 --> 01:28:49.359
<v Speaker 4>take notice. That is where the best high stakes games are.

1785
01:28:49.520 --> 01:28:52.119
<v Speaker 4>That's where the best experts play, and that's where I

1786
01:28:52.159 --> 01:28:55.079
<v Speaker 4>play because I want to be an FFPC champion and

1787
01:28:55.119 --> 01:28:57.239
<v Speaker 4>put that title on me, put the money in my

1788
01:28:57.319 --> 01:29:01.279
<v Speaker 4>pocket and put that in my biof Champion and the

1789
01:29:01.359 --> 01:29:04.800
<v Speaker 4>FFPC Weekly Contest is the best pace of play during

1790
01:29:04.800 --> 01:29:05.279
<v Speaker 4>the season.

1791
01:29:06.239 --> 01:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Want to welcome you back to FFPC Insider Access here

1792
01:29:09.760 --> 01:29:12.439
<v Speaker 1>live on the Better Sports Network for Fantasy Football Night

1793
01:29:12.439 --> 01:29:14.119
<v Speaker 1>in America. We'll get about a half hour left to

1794
01:29:14.119 --> 01:29:17.119
<v Speaker 1>answer your start sick questions. Beck Miller from established the

1795
01:29:17.199 --> 01:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>run Hopping Aboard tonight to try to tackle Week four

1796
01:29:21.359 --> 01:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and try to get ahead of everything to make sure

1797
01:29:23.760 --> 01:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that you're setting yourself up for the best possible success

1798
01:29:27.119 --> 01:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>going forward this season. In fact, I want to remind

1799
01:29:29.760 --> 01:29:32.159
<v Speaker 1>everybody my ffpc dot com is where to go for

1800
01:29:32.199 --> 01:29:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Week four success in the Weekly Challenge ten thirty hundred

1801
01:29:35.199 --> 01:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>team contest twenty five hundred dollars as much you can

1802
01:29:37.760 --> 01:29:41.479
<v Speaker 1>win one player per NFL team. That's at ny ffpc

1803
01:29:41.640 --> 01:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com. No draft, no salary cap, just fun. Pick

1804
01:29:44.560 --> 01:29:47.159
<v Speaker 1>your players and get it going there at my ffpc

1805
01:29:47.359 --> 01:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com. The Cardinals have thrown an incomplete pass to

1806
01:29:50.720 --> 01:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Trey McBride on first down, and they will have it

1807
01:29:53.600 --> 01:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>second and ten from their own forty eight Here Jack

1808
01:29:56.840 --> 01:30:02.439
<v Speaker 1>question from ky Flynn on YouTube A trade question. Should

1809
01:30:02.520 --> 01:30:07.199
<v Speaker 1>Kai trade Bijon Robinson and Ladd McConkie and getting Jonathan

1810
01:30:07.279 --> 01:30:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Taylor and Zay Flowers. Which side of that trade would

1811
01:30:11.439 --> 01:30:13.319
<v Speaker 1>you rather be on, given that you're giving up a

1812
01:30:13.399 --> 01:30:16.279
<v Speaker 1>running back and receiver to get a running back and

1813
01:30:16.319 --> 01:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver.

1814
01:30:18.039 --> 01:30:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's pretty close, But I think at

1815
01:30:19.840 --> 01:30:22.760
<v Speaker 2>this point Jonathan Taylor is probably the most valuable asset

1816
01:30:22.760 --> 01:30:27.560
<v Speaker 2>in fantasy football, and so it's worth how disappointing Laddie Venezuela.

1817
01:30:27.560 --> 01:30:29.319
<v Speaker 3>I think it's JT and Flowers for me.

1818
01:30:30.520 --> 01:30:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I would, I would, I would agree with you. I

1819
01:30:33.720 --> 01:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's the where I roll with it, although

1820
01:30:36.960 --> 01:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it is very close, because I think Taylor is at

1821
01:30:39.600 --> 01:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the peak of his powers right now, and in Jon

1822
01:30:43.800 --> 01:30:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Robinson you might be getting at a bit of a discount.

1823
01:30:46.640 --> 01:30:48.239
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see what happens there. We have to see

1824
01:30:48.239 --> 01:30:50.439
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in this game right now. Kyler Murray has

1825
01:30:50.479 --> 01:30:54.279
<v Speaker 1>just thrown an interception to the Seattle defense and it appears,

1826
01:30:54.319 --> 01:30:57.479
<v Speaker 1>according to the Cardinals defenders that whoever picked him off,

1827
01:30:57.520 --> 01:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the safety, one of the safeties

1828
01:30:59.840 --> 01:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>has fumbled the football. On the return. The Cardinals are

1829
01:31:02.880 --> 01:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>saying they have it, and the referee agrees the Cardinals

1830
01:31:05.800 --> 01:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>do have it off the fumble from the Seattle Seahawks

1831
01:31:10.560 --> 01:31:14.159
<v Speaker 1>safety that picked it off. This was Bryant And who

1832
01:31:14.239 --> 01:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>was this was this? Michael Wilson? No, it was Oh

1833
01:31:18.760 --> 01:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, this is close because it almost looks like

1834
01:31:21.039 --> 01:31:24.359
<v Speaker 1>he slid down and then lost the football. Did he

1835
01:31:24.399 --> 01:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>give himself up? I'm sure they're gonna look at this here,

1836
01:31:27.520 --> 01:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Cardinals with a recovery off the Bryant interception

1837
01:31:30.960 --> 01:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>fumble from the Kyler Murray interception. Okay, let's move forward

1838
01:31:35.800 --> 01:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>here with some starter sick questions. Some of these guys

1839
01:31:38.520 --> 01:31:41.399
<v Speaker 1>we've tackled. Some of these guys we haven't. But we're

1840
01:31:41.439 --> 01:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna pair him up tonight here and help you out

1841
01:31:43.720 --> 01:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the best we can. Would you rather start or actually

1842
01:31:47.880 --> 01:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I beg your pardon, would you rather start Alvin Kamara

1843
01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:55.159
<v Speaker 1>or Jalen Warren this week? Jalen Warren is in Dublin

1844
01:31:55.239 --> 01:31:59.079
<v Speaker 1>against the Vikings on Sunday morning. Alvin Kamara is gonna

1845
01:31:59.079 --> 01:32:02.359
<v Speaker 1>be at the Buffalo Fields in what should be a

1846
01:32:02.680 --> 01:32:06.960
<v Speaker 1>heavy passing volume game for Rattler. However, the targets that

1847
01:32:07.319 --> 01:32:11.279
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily have been existent for Alvin Kamara so far

1848
01:32:11.359 --> 01:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>this year.

1849
01:32:13.199 --> 01:32:16.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this would be Jalen Warren for me. He's been

1850
01:32:16.560 --> 01:32:19.560
<v Speaker 2>the early down back for Pittsburgh all year. It seems

1851
01:32:19.600 --> 01:32:21.880
<v Speaker 2>like as of the past couple of weeks he's he's

1852
01:32:21.880 --> 01:32:24.239
<v Speaker 2>taken over for Kenneth Gainwell on past times too, and

1853
01:32:24.279 --> 01:32:26.359
<v Speaker 2>it seems like he's just kind of the three down

1854
01:32:26.399 --> 01:32:28.359
<v Speaker 2>guy for the Steelers at the moment. He hasn't been

1855
01:32:28.399 --> 01:32:31.680
<v Speaker 2>as efficient as we're used to seeing from Jalen Warren.

1856
01:32:31.760 --> 01:32:34.319
<v Speaker 2>But I mean it's not like Kamara has been particularly

1857
01:32:34.399 --> 01:32:37.119
<v Speaker 2>efficient either, and it's not like we can expect Kamara

1858
01:32:37.199 --> 01:32:40.680
<v Speaker 2>to be super efficient in this in this game environment.

1859
01:32:41.479 --> 01:32:44.079
<v Speaker 3>So I think Warren, here are you?

1860
01:32:45.079 --> 01:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I said at the start of the year and throughout

1861
01:32:46.720 --> 01:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>drafting season Jack that I thought we could squeeze one

1862
01:32:50.159 --> 01:32:53.239
<v Speaker 1>more year of fantasy goodness out of Alvin Kamara and

1863
01:32:53.279 --> 01:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans. I'm starting to doubt that statement. What about you?

1864
01:32:56.960 --> 01:32:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Is is this? I mean, is this it for Kamara?

1865
01:32:59.319 --> 01:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Is he dost? Is this a player that has been

1866
01:33:02.760 --> 01:33:05.039
<v Speaker 1>drafted as sort of like a high end running back

1867
01:33:05.079 --> 01:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>two that's gonna slip into borderline flex going forward?

1868
01:33:09.840 --> 01:33:12.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he might be. It's mostly the lack of targets

1869
01:33:12.439 --> 01:33:16.640
<v Speaker 2>that's concerning for me. And it's pretty strange with just

1870
01:33:16.720 --> 01:33:18.920
<v Speaker 2>how consistent he's been as a pass catcher throughout his

1871
01:33:19.079 --> 01:33:21.640
<v Speaker 2>entire career. I mean, even if he's lost the stuff,

1872
01:33:21.640 --> 01:33:23.520
<v Speaker 2>you'd think that they'd make more of an effort to

1873
01:33:23.560 --> 01:33:25.880
<v Speaker 2>get him the ball, but they just haven't so far.

1874
01:33:27.119 --> 01:33:29.319
<v Speaker 2>And I think that that has to rebound at some point,

1875
01:33:29.319 --> 01:33:31.359
<v Speaker 2>but will rebound to the levels we're used to saying

1876
01:33:31.399 --> 01:33:34.640
<v Speaker 2>from Alvin Kamara probably not, just given how slow A

1877
01:33:34.680 --> 01:33:37.439
<v Speaker 2>started to spend. I still think Kamara is a fantasy starter.

1878
01:33:38.159 --> 01:33:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I just think that maybe relative the preseason expectations, we

1879
01:33:41.880 --> 01:33:44.319
<v Speaker 2>need to temper how we look at him moving forward.

1880
01:33:45.239 --> 01:33:48.039
<v Speaker 1>The question that we have from Racy and Ray, I

1881
01:33:48.079 --> 01:33:51.039
<v Speaker 1>think you might have posted something in YouTube earlier that

1882
01:33:51.119 --> 01:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I made a mental note that we were going to

1883
01:33:52.640 --> 01:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>get back to, and I don't know if we ever

1884
01:33:53.960 --> 01:33:56.159
<v Speaker 1>did so. If you asked us something tonight that I

1885
01:33:56.199 --> 01:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't bring up, please post it again. But right now

1886
01:33:58.600 --> 01:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll answer your starters. A question here. He needs to

1887
01:34:01.840 --> 01:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>bench one of these guys here, Jack, Is it Teteroa

1888
01:34:04.640 --> 01:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>McMillan who is at New England this week? Is it

1889
01:34:07.560 --> 01:34:10.119
<v Speaker 1>a Mecca at Buka who is at home against the Eagles,

1890
01:34:10.399 --> 01:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>or is it JK. Dobbins at home against the Bengals.

1891
01:34:13.560 --> 01:34:16.159
<v Speaker 1>I know he's got the best matchup, but in full PPR,

1892
01:34:16.199 --> 01:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Dobbins is the one I'm benching. I'm

1893
01:34:18.520 --> 01:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>playing McMillan, I'm playing at Guka. A lot of question

1894
01:34:21.039 --> 01:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>marks with the Tampa wide receivers. You know, I don't

1895
01:34:24.279 --> 01:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>even think I Buka's listed on the injury report, so

1896
01:34:26.520 --> 01:34:29.039
<v Speaker 1>I really like him this week, Dobbins is the guy

1897
01:34:29.079 --> 01:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I probably sit, although I you know, I could easily

1898
01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>be wrong on this.

1899
01:34:33.760 --> 01:34:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's definitely a great spot for Dobbins is big

1900
01:34:36.840 --> 01:34:39.720
<v Speaker 2>favorites over Cincinnati. I do think you have to sit

1901
01:34:39.840 --> 01:34:43.039
<v Speaker 2>him with these two receivers. Is your other option? I

1902
01:34:43.039 --> 01:34:46.279
<v Speaker 2>mean at BUKA is the easy first option for me.

1903
01:34:46.439 --> 01:34:49.720
<v Speaker 2>I think with Evans out and with Godwin probably operating

1904
01:34:49.760 --> 01:34:54.039
<v Speaker 2>at far below, I think that he should get peppered

1905
01:34:54.039 --> 01:34:56.680
<v Speaker 2>with targets and then it comes down to McMillan and Dobbins,

1906
01:34:56.720 --> 01:34:59.439
<v Speaker 2>and McMillan's just getting so many targets and he's just

1907
01:34:59.560 --> 01:35:03.520
<v Speaker 2>looked really good. I think that maybe this could be

1908
01:35:03.640 --> 01:35:05.840
<v Speaker 2>the spot where he finally turns that into a big

1909
01:35:05.880 --> 01:35:09.960
<v Speaker 2>fantasy outing. So I'm going with the rookie receivers.

1910
01:35:10.439 --> 01:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>The situation with this one is something Jack and Era

1911
01:35:16.119 --> 01:35:19.039
<v Speaker 1>of the same mind done. I just watched a replay

1912
01:35:19.079 --> 01:35:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of that interception that Kyler Murray threw. I don't know,

1913
01:35:22.039 --> 01:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a tendant for Marvin Harrison, but

1914
01:35:24.920 --> 01:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a really bad pass, bad decision. They reviewed it,

1915
01:35:28.680 --> 01:35:31.720
<v Speaker 1>they upheld the ruling. It is Arizona football and Trey

1916
01:35:31.800 --> 01:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Benson gets a twelve yard rush right away on first

1917
01:35:35.239 --> 01:35:39.119
<v Speaker 1>down as they plunge in to Seattle territory. He ends

1918
01:35:39.199 --> 01:35:43.199
<v Speaker 1>up catching a pass for four yards on the very

1919
01:35:43.239 --> 01:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>next play, but Tyreek Woollen flagged for a face mask

1920
01:35:46.680 --> 01:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>penalty as well, tack on fifteen yards and the Cardinals

1921
01:35:49.680 --> 01:35:52.399
<v Speaker 1>now have it first and ten at the Seattle forty

1922
01:35:52.439 --> 01:35:55.159
<v Speaker 1>one with eight ten to go in the first quarter.

1923
01:35:56.600 --> 01:36:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb or Isaiah Pacheco is our next star? Or

1924
01:36:00.279 --> 01:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>sit here limited upside with both of these guys a

1925
01:36:03.760 --> 01:36:07.439
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly limited floors as well. Somebody asked me on

1926
01:36:08.520 --> 01:36:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I was doing a hit on another radio station earlier

1927
01:36:10.880 --> 01:36:12.760
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Somebody asked me what do I do with

1928
01:36:12.800 --> 01:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah Pacheco right now? And the best thing I can

1929
01:36:14.720 --> 01:36:17.840
<v Speaker 1>say Jack was don't cut him. But I'm certainly not

1930
01:36:17.920 --> 01:36:20.760
<v Speaker 1>starting him right now. Nick Chubb. I think Woody Marx

1931
01:36:20.840 --> 01:36:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is working his way into that conversation as well in

1932
01:36:23.840 --> 01:36:26.079
<v Speaker 1>the backfield. If you have to start one of them

1933
01:36:26.119 --> 01:36:31.199
<v Speaker 1>this week, certainly exhaust all other possibilities first. But I

1934
01:36:31.239 --> 01:36:33.840
<v Speaker 1>still lean towards Chubb over Pacheco this week.

1935
01:36:34.640 --> 01:36:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's Chubb for me too. The Texans are finally

1936
01:36:38.960 --> 01:36:40.600
<v Speaker 2>should be able to move the ball a little bit

1937
01:36:40.640 --> 01:36:43.399
<v Speaker 2>against the Titans, their big favorites here. I think Woody

1938
01:36:43.479 --> 01:36:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Marx is ascending. I think that eventually he could really

1939
01:36:48.079 --> 01:36:51.159
<v Speaker 2>usurp Chubb as the rby one. But I think for now,

1940
01:36:51.279 --> 01:36:53.319
<v Speaker 2>Chub is still the preferred option on early downs, and

1941
01:36:53.359 --> 01:36:56.439
<v Speaker 2>I think that in positive game script he should still

1942
01:36:56.479 --> 01:36:59.199
<v Speaker 2>be in line for double digit carries. So it's Chubb

1943
01:36:59.239 --> 01:37:00.199
<v Speaker 2>for me over pacheck Up.

1944
01:37:00.840 --> 01:37:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of the Texans ground game, I noticed Joe Mixon

1945
01:37:04.479 --> 01:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>was cut in some of my twelve team to twenty

1946
01:37:06.560 --> 01:37:09.439
<v Speaker 1>man roster leagues. Do I need to find a roster

1947
01:37:09.520 --> 01:37:11.760
<v Speaker 1>spot for him in that deep of a league or

1948
01:37:11.760 --> 01:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>do I just continue to leave him on the waiver were.

1949
01:37:14.800 --> 01:37:16.680
<v Speaker 2>I think you can leave him on the waiver wire.

1950
01:37:17.760 --> 01:37:20.119
<v Speaker 2>I think I don't think he's gonna play this year.

1951
01:37:20.600 --> 01:37:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, let me ask you this, Jack put you

1952
01:37:23.279 --> 01:37:26.319
<v Speaker 1>on the spot. Percentage chance that Joe Mixon takes at

1953
01:37:26.399 --> 01:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>least one snap in the regular season this year? Is

1954
01:37:31.600 --> 01:37:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it less? Is it less than twenty percent?

1955
01:37:34.439 --> 01:37:35.000
<v Speaker 3>It might be.

1956
01:37:36.239 --> 01:37:40.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've just heard some some pretty bad stuff I've heard.

1957
01:37:40.199 --> 01:37:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I've heard nothing which makes me think it's really bad.

1958
01:37:42.760 --> 01:37:45.359
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, I think I think he's a pretty big

1959
01:37:45.439 --> 01:37:46.239
<v Speaker 2>underdog to play.

1960
01:37:48.399 --> 01:37:52.439
<v Speaker 1>The Cincinnati Bengals will continue their season in Week four

1961
01:37:52.800 --> 01:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in Denver. The Mile High City RAC wants to know

1962
01:37:56.199 --> 01:37:58.800
<v Speaker 1>what are we expecting from the Bengals offense going forward,

1963
01:37:59.199 --> 01:38:02.359
<v Speaker 1>specifically Chase in Denver. I don't believe you can correct

1964
01:38:02.399 --> 01:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>me if I'm wrong on this. I don't believe Patrick

1965
01:38:04.560 --> 01:38:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Sirtan travels with the opponent's best wide receiver, so certainly

1966
01:38:09.119 --> 01:38:11.479
<v Speaker 1>they can scheme up Jamar Chase. But it was really

1967
01:38:11.479 --> 01:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>bad against Minnesota this past week. I'm of the belief

1968
01:38:14.640 --> 01:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that that's probably Browning's worst game of the season. I

1969
01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:19.720
<v Speaker 1>think better things are ahead from the Bengals, but perhaps

1970
01:38:19.720 --> 01:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm being too much of a cock eyed optimus here, Jack,

1971
01:38:22.640 --> 01:38:24.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about the Bengals going forward and

1972
01:38:24.840 --> 01:38:27.199
<v Speaker 1>then specifically against the Broncos in Week four?

1973
01:38:28.319 --> 01:38:31.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think Certan does shadowt a pretty decent amount,

1974
01:38:31.600 --> 01:38:34.119
<v Speaker 2>so I'm sure the Bengals will try to get creative

1975
01:38:34.119 --> 01:38:37.399
<v Speaker 2>and get them away from Cirtan. But I mean, it

1976
01:38:37.439 --> 01:38:39.520
<v Speaker 2>is like Certan is the defensive player of the year,

1977
01:38:39.520 --> 01:38:41.399
<v Speaker 2>but it's still Jamar Chase. I don't think it's like

1978
01:38:41.720 --> 01:38:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Stan's gonna totally shut him down and limit him to zero.

1979
01:38:44.920 --> 01:38:48.119
<v Speaker 2>It's definitely a downgrade relative the most matchups though, and

1980
01:38:48.439 --> 01:38:51.159
<v Speaker 2>with Burrow out, it's definitely a downgrade relative to where

1981
01:38:51.159 --> 01:38:54.760
<v Speaker 2>we were taking Chase in the preseason. I do think

1982
01:38:54.800 --> 01:38:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the Chase is probably less impacted than someone like T. Higgins,

1983
01:38:58.560 --> 01:39:03.880
<v Speaker 2>who's i think, or dependent on Joe Burrow moving the

1984
01:39:03.880 --> 01:39:07.000
<v Speaker 2>ball and scoring points and getting touchdowns, whereas Chase is

1985
01:39:07.039 --> 01:39:08.760
<v Speaker 2>more of a playmaker with the ball in his hand.

1986
01:39:08.800 --> 01:39:10.800
<v Speaker 2>So as long as Brown can get him the ball

1987
01:39:10.840 --> 01:39:13.079
<v Speaker 2>five yards down the field, there's some chance Tom Chase

1988
01:39:13.119 --> 01:39:15.760
<v Speaker 2>makes the play, Whereas if T. Higgins catches the ball

1989
01:39:15.800 --> 01:39:18.680
<v Speaker 2>five yards down the field, that's probably not going much further.

1990
01:39:20.159 --> 01:39:23.319
<v Speaker 2>I think Chase he's still a very clear defensive starter,

1991
01:39:23.439 --> 01:39:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Like you're never benching Tomar Chase regardless of who's under center.

1992
01:39:28.159 --> 01:39:31.319
<v Speaker 2>I think he's probably like a low end wide receiver one.

1993
01:39:31.520 --> 01:39:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Russ Higgins is the guy.

1994
01:39:32.920 --> 01:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>He's the guy you consider benching, right, I've already benched

1995
01:39:36.000 --> 01:39:37.720
<v Speaker 1>him in a couple of leagues this week. He's not

1996
01:39:37.840 --> 01:39:42.079
<v Speaker 1>the slam dunk start that that that he was before. Uh,

1997
01:39:42.159 --> 01:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you got to have one hell of a team to

1998
01:39:43.680 --> 01:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>be benching Jamar Chase and quite frankly, if you have

1999
01:39:46.680 --> 01:39:49.279
<v Speaker 1>that team, you need to up your game and join

2000
01:39:49.319 --> 01:39:52.399
<v Speaker 1>THEEC or something like that next year, because that it's

2001
01:39:52.439 --> 01:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>not even fun when he when you have that deep

2002
01:39:54.640 --> 01:39:57.359
<v Speaker 1>of a wide receiver Cort that you could consider benching

2003
01:39:57.520 --> 01:40:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Jamar Chase Uh speaking of stagnate here, I don't know

2004
01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:03.079
<v Speaker 1>if I mentioned it or not. The Cardinals are attempting

2005
01:40:03.119 --> 01:40:06.279
<v Speaker 1>a thirty two yard field goal attempt here Greg George

2006
01:40:06.279 --> 01:40:08.399
<v Speaker 1>with a couple of passes, one for two yards, one

2007
01:40:08.439 --> 01:40:11.840
<v Speaker 1>for nine yards. There was a false start penalty that

2008
01:40:11.960 --> 01:40:14.119
<v Speaker 1>moved the Cardinals back. Trey McBride did get a four

2009
01:40:14.199 --> 01:40:17.119
<v Speaker 1>yard catch on this drive as well. Chad Ryland has

2010
01:40:17.279 --> 01:40:20.319
<v Speaker 1>nailed the thirty three yard field goal as the Cardinals

2011
01:40:20.359 --> 01:40:22.840
<v Speaker 1>have taken a three to nothing lead with four h

2012
01:40:22.920 --> 01:40:25.119
<v Speaker 1>nine to go in the first quarter. Jack and I

2013
01:40:25.159 --> 01:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>will be with you through the remainder of the first quarter. Tonight,

2014
01:40:29.479 --> 01:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Flacco is king on YouTube. Jack has a question. This

2015
01:40:33.960 --> 01:40:38.119
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. He needs one of Ramandre Stevenson, Beshelle Touton,

2016
01:40:38.800 --> 01:40:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Devin Singletary, Ray Davis. This is full PPR and this

2017
01:40:42.560 --> 01:40:45.079
<v Speaker 1>is his number two spot for running back. He does

2018
01:40:45.119 --> 01:40:48.079
<v Speaker 1>admit that it is gross, and yes it is gross,

2019
01:40:48.479 --> 01:40:53.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm a limiting Singletary, even with the purported big time

2020
01:40:53.279 --> 01:40:56.279
<v Speaker 1>rushing second half that the Bill should have against the Saints,

2021
01:40:56.319 --> 01:40:59.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm eliminating Ray Davis. This comes down to Stevenson or

2022
01:41:00.039 --> 01:41:03.079
<v Speaker 1>for me, I lean towards Stevenson, But I can be

2023
01:41:03.159 --> 01:41:05.039
<v Speaker 1>persuaded if you want to make an argument for two.

2024
01:41:06.359 --> 01:41:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think you're right to eliminate Singletary and Ray Davis.

2025
01:41:09.399 --> 01:41:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I think I leen Remandre as well. I mean, it's

2026
01:41:14.920 --> 01:41:18.159
<v Speaker 2>a really good matchup, like we've said this a few times,

2027
01:41:18.159 --> 01:41:20.479
<v Speaker 2>but the floor is nothing here. If Rabel decides to

2028
01:41:20.560 --> 01:41:22.640
<v Speaker 2>teach him a lesson after two fumbles last week, there's

2029
01:41:22.680 --> 01:41:25.359
<v Speaker 2>some chance they lean fully into Trevion Henderson. But I

2030
01:41:25.359 --> 01:41:27.119
<v Speaker 2>mean when when these are your other options, it's not

2031
01:41:27.159 --> 01:41:30.399
<v Speaker 2>like the other guys have a very stable floor either.

2032
01:41:30.920 --> 01:41:34.239
<v Speaker 2>And so the Patriots, the Patriots should be able to

2033
01:41:34.319 --> 01:41:36.920
<v Speaker 2>run the ball against this Carolina defense, like pretty much

2034
01:41:36.960 --> 01:41:40.039
<v Speaker 2>everyone has been able to so far. So it's still

2035
01:41:40.079 --> 01:41:40.760
<v Speaker 2>mandre for me.

2036
01:41:42.000 --> 01:41:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I wouldn't overthink it. Tooton's on the

2037
01:41:46.279 --> 01:41:48.880
<v Speaker 1>injury report as well, not saying that he's not going

2038
01:41:48.960 --> 01:41:52.479
<v Speaker 1>to play. Your thoughts, Jack, I don't know, I don't

2039
01:41:52.479 --> 01:41:55.600
<v Speaker 1>know if you took a strong stance on this Jacksonville

2040
01:41:55.680 --> 01:41:59.279
<v Speaker 1>running back situation prior to the start of the season,

2041
01:41:59.520 --> 01:42:02.159
<v Speaker 1>but I've see it's changed with the Tank Bigsby trade.

2042
01:42:02.520 --> 01:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>What are you looking at from Jacksonville right now? Is

2043
01:42:04.960 --> 01:42:07.600
<v Speaker 1>this Etn's backfield or do you think Tutin is going

2044
01:42:07.680 --> 01:42:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to be taking it away from him before the calendar

2045
01:42:09.800 --> 01:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>turns to twenty twenty six.

2046
01:42:12.199 --> 01:42:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it's Etn's backfield right now for sure. I

2047
01:42:14.640 --> 01:42:16.880
<v Speaker 2>think Etn is like a definite fantasy starter in the

2048
01:42:16.880 --> 01:42:19.199
<v Speaker 2>short term. Tuton has looked really good so far, and

2049
01:42:19.239 --> 01:42:22.279
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was meaningful that they gave Tutin a

2050
01:42:22.439 --> 01:42:24.199
<v Speaker 2>goal Lie Carey. I think it was from I think

2051
01:42:24.199 --> 01:42:25.840
<v Speaker 2>it was from like the one yard line last week

2052
01:42:25.880 --> 01:42:28.479
<v Speaker 2>and he scored on it. And then there was that

2053
01:42:28.800 --> 01:42:30.960
<v Speaker 2>screen pass that everyone saw in week two where he

2054
01:42:31.439 --> 01:42:34.680
<v Speaker 2>made the defender miss and trot it in. So I

2055
01:42:34.800 --> 01:42:38.239
<v Speaker 2>really like Tutan as an upside shot. I was hopeful

2056
01:42:38.279 --> 01:42:40.960
<v Speaker 2>that he would really ascend more than he did in

2057
01:42:40.960 --> 01:42:43.279
<v Speaker 2>week three. From a usage standpoint. We didn't really see

2058
01:42:43.319 --> 01:42:46.720
<v Speaker 2>the role grow like I was hoping it would, but

2059
01:42:46.800 --> 01:42:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I think he's still like a really strong hold. I

2060
01:42:48.840 --> 01:42:52.800
<v Speaker 2>think we've seen et in the past few years. I mean,

2061
01:42:52.840 --> 01:42:55.000
<v Speaker 2>we've seen ETN show upside before, so I don't want

2062
01:42:55.000 --> 01:42:57.640
<v Speaker 2>to come off as as anti ETN and more so

2063
01:42:57.840 --> 01:43:00.840
<v Speaker 2>pro Tutin, but I think think both are good. I

2064
01:43:00.840 --> 01:43:03.000
<v Speaker 2>think ets a definite fantasy starter right now. I think

2065
01:43:03.039 --> 01:43:06.359
<v Speaker 2>ETN is a good hold. I think he's a tough

2066
01:43:06.399 --> 01:43:08.560
<v Speaker 2>buy right now since he scored a touchdown in back

2067
01:43:08.600 --> 01:43:10.119
<v Speaker 2>to back weeks, But if we ever get a tooton

2068
01:43:10.199 --> 01:43:13.439
<v Speaker 2>floor game, I think he makes sense as a by candidate.

2069
01:43:14.239 --> 01:43:18.319
<v Speaker 1>If ETN were to go down, is this like eighty

2070
01:43:18.399 --> 01:43:20.800
<v Speaker 1>percent of the snap share with LeQuinn Allen getting twenty

2071
01:43:20.800 --> 01:43:22.880
<v Speaker 1>percent or how would you think that that would play out?

2072
01:43:23.359 --> 01:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm only asking this for people who are wondering

2073
01:43:26.039 --> 01:43:28.119
<v Speaker 1>what they have in Tuton on their bench right now.

2074
01:43:28.960 --> 01:43:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it would be pretty much a Toton

2075
01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:33.960
<v Speaker 2>rocket ship. They're they're giving Lacking Allen the pass downs.

2076
01:43:35.359 --> 01:43:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I imagine he'd keep that role if ETN goes down.

2077
01:43:37.760 --> 01:43:37.920
<v Speaker 3>But.

2078
01:43:39.479 --> 01:43:42.279
<v Speaker 2>The Jaguars are still going to throw to their running

2079
01:43:42.319 --> 01:43:45.399
<v Speaker 2>backs on early downs. It's kind of similar to Trey Benson,

2080
01:43:45.399 --> 01:43:48.760
<v Speaker 2>where Laking Allen is the Amario de Meercato, but base

2081
01:43:48.800 --> 01:43:51.399
<v Speaker 2>jall Tutan would be the Trey Benson and that's a

2082
01:43:51.560 --> 01:43:52.880
<v Speaker 2>very valuable fantasy starter.

2083
01:43:53.880 --> 01:43:57.079
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Walker is really off to a great start tonight

2084
01:43:57.119 --> 01:44:00.680
<v Speaker 1>as he busts off on first and ten for the

2085
01:44:00.720 --> 01:44:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks, a twenty one yard run that gets him

2086
01:44:04.279 --> 01:44:07.199
<v Speaker 1>out of bounds at the Arizona thirty five. So to

2087
01:44:07.279 --> 01:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>recap so far, Kenneth Walker tonight for carries twenty seven yards.

2088
01:44:11.279 --> 01:44:14.720
<v Speaker 1>He also has a twenty nine yard catch as well.

2089
01:44:14.760 --> 01:44:18.239
<v Speaker 1>As the Seahawks march down the field against the Cardinals

2090
01:44:18.239 --> 01:44:20.159
<v Speaker 1>here trying to tie this game up or maybe even

2091
01:44:20.159 --> 01:44:22.239
<v Speaker 1>take the lead. I want to shift over to wide

2092
01:44:22.239 --> 01:44:25.439
<v Speaker 1>receiver here for you, Jack. This is a fun one

2093
01:44:25.439 --> 01:44:29.199
<v Speaker 1>this week. Who would you rather start? And again a

2094
01:44:29.319 --> 01:44:31.439
<v Speaker 1>question that we didn't think we'd be asking ourselves here

2095
01:44:31.479 --> 01:44:36.199
<v Speaker 1>in September, Quinton Johnston at the Giants or DJ Moore

2096
01:44:36.560 --> 01:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Raiders in Las Vegas.

2097
01:44:39.880 --> 01:44:42.920
<v Speaker 2>It's Johnston for me, which I did not really think

2098
01:44:42.960 --> 01:44:45.000
<v Speaker 2>i'd be saying three weeks ago. But DJ More just

2099
01:44:45.000 --> 01:44:47.760
<v Speaker 2>has not had the role we're used to seeing from him.

2100
01:44:47.760 --> 01:44:50.520
<v Speaker 2>I think Johnston has a higher target share so far

2101
01:44:50.640 --> 01:44:54.880
<v Speaker 2>on an offense that's throwing significantly more and significantly more efficiently.

2102
01:44:55.319 --> 01:44:59.119
<v Speaker 2>At least then they're not playing the Cowboys quote unquote defense.

2103
01:45:00.119 --> 01:45:02.319
<v Speaker 2>I definitely like QJ over DJ Moore.

2104
01:45:02.840 --> 01:45:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's crazy. These are two guys trending in the

2105
01:45:05.720 --> 01:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>wrong or different directions. I should say DJ Moore probably

2106
01:45:08.720 --> 01:45:11.159
<v Speaker 1>not in the right one. Think about what Luther Burden

2107
01:45:11.279 --> 01:45:13.359
<v Speaker 1>was able to do last week, not only on that

2108
01:45:13.399 --> 01:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>big flea flicker, but a couple other plays as well,

2109
01:45:16.439 --> 01:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Roma Dunza ascending to sort of this quasi number one

2110
01:45:19.640 --> 01:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>role for the Bears. And then you have Quentin Johnston

2111
01:45:23.359 --> 01:45:26.600
<v Speaker 1>who isn't going away. I've made the case that Keenan

2112
01:45:26.640 --> 01:45:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Allen and Ladd McConkie are a little bit more of

2113
01:45:29.560 --> 01:45:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a duplication of skills, and as a result, Quentin Johnston

2114
01:45:32.760 --> 01:45:35.039
<v Speaker 1>probably gets on the field, maybe more than he should.

2115
01:45:35.239 --> 01:45:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But what he's able to do on the outside is

2116
01:45:37.000 --> 01:45:40.239
<v Speaker 1>something that Alan can no longer do, and maybe Lad

2117
01:45:40.279 --> 01:45:43.239
<v Speaker 1>McConkie is not able to do. I don't know, but

2118
01:45:43.319 --> 01:45:45.279
<v Speaker 1>he's out there quite a bit. I'm with you. I'm

2119
01:45:45.279 --> 01:45:48.279
<v Speaker 1>playing Johnston over DJ Moore this week. I don't want

2120
01:45:48.279 --> 01:45:50.479
<v Speaker 1>to say I'm not thinking twice about it, but I

2121
01:45:50.479 --> 01:45:54.880
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty good about this decision. We have another Kenneth

2122
01:45:54.920 --> 01:45:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Walker run for eight yards and a Cooper Cup sighting

2123
01:45:58.079 --> 01:46:01.840
<v Speaker 1>all the way down to the sixteen yard line for Arizona.

2124
01:46:01.920 --> 01:46:04.920
<v Speaker 1>It is a eleven yard catch for Cooper Cup on

2125
01:46:05.079 --> 01:46:07.760
<v Speaker 1>third and two, and now the Cardinals have it first

2126
01:46:07.760 --> 01:46:12.079
<v Speaker 1>and ten. At the no I take that back. They

2127
01:46:12.119 --> 01:46:14.399
<v Speaker 1>no longer have it first and ten. Sam Donald is

2128
01:46:14.399 --> 01:46:17.079
<v Speaker 1>throwing a touchdown. It is not to Cup, it is

2129
01:46:17.119 --> 01:46:21.079
<v Speaker 1>not to Smith, the Jigba Walker, Charbonne, or even Elijah Arroyo.

2130
01:46:21.199 --> 01:46:24.079
<v Speaker 1>AJ Barner gets in the end zone on a sixteen

2131
01:46:24.199 --> 01:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>yard touchdown catch from Sam Donald. The Seahawks have taken

2132
01:46:27.920 --> 01:46:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the lead. Nice little wheel slash fade route there for

2133
01:46:32.960 --> 01:46:35.600
<v Speaker 1>aj Barner, well set up, he was open and the

2134
01:46:35.640 --> 01:46:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks have a six to three league The extra point

2135
01:46:38.439 --> 01:46:41.920
<v Speaker 1>is pending. The Seahawks have completed the drive nine plays,

2136
01:46:41.920 --> 01:46:44.880
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven yards. The Jason Myers extra point is good.

2137
01:46:44.920 --> 01:46:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Three h four to go in the first quarter. The

2138
01:46:47.399 --> 01:46:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks now on top of the Cardinals seven to three.

2139
01:46:51.399 --> 01:46:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy and one Dale Robinson. A lot of people

2140
01:46:54.880 --> 01:46:57.359
<v Speaker 1>will have both these players on their team, and they're

2141
01:46:57.359 --> 01:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in a conundrum this week. Based on what Judy had

2142
01:47:01.000 --> 01:47:02.920
<v Speaker 1>did at the end of last year, what he's doing

2143
01:47:02.920 --> 01:47:05.439
<v Speaker 1>this year, and then what Wandale Robinson did in Week two.

2144
01:47:05.520 --> 01:47:09.800
<v Speaker 1>My god, the monkey wrench in that this conversation right now,

2145
01:47:10.239 --> 01:47:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Jack is Jackson Dark starting now for the Giants this week.

2146
01:47:14.640 --> 01:47:16.439
<v Speaker 1>And I know a lot of people believe that this

2147
01:47:16.520 --> 01:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>is a really really good thing for Wandale Robinson. It

2148
01:47:19.319 --> 01:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>may or may not be. I don't know. They get

2149
01:47:21.520 --> 01:47:24.079
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers this week at home, Jerry Judy travels to

2150
01:47:24.159 --> 01:47:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Detroit to take on that Lion's defense. You can only

2151
01:47:27.520 --> 01:47:29.680
<v Speaker 1>play one Judy or Robinson.

2152
01:47:31.560 --> 01:47:35.399
<v Speaker 2>I think it's Wandale. For me, the average up of

2153
01:47:35.479 --> 01:47:38.520
<v Speaker 2>target for Wandale has gone from let me pull up

2154
01:47:38.760 --> 01:47:41.039
<v Speaker 2>exactly what it was. It was five point one last year,

2155
01:47:41.359 --> 01:47:43.920
<v Speaker 2>five point five year prior. It was three point three

2156
01:47:43.920 --> 01:47:46.279
<v Speaker 2>in week one. In Week two it was sixteen point seven,

2157
01:47:46.319 --> 01:47:48.199
<v Speaker 2>and then last week it was twenty one point three.

2158
01:47:48.720 --> 01:47:50.880
<v Speaker 2>So we know that he's a strong target owner and

2159
01:47:50.920 --> 01:47:54.720
<v Speaker 2>they're finally actually throwing the ball down the field to him.

2160
01:47:54.960 --> 01:47:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Obviously didn't really complete those passes last week when week

2161
01:47:57.960 --> 01:48:00.640
<v Speaker 2>two we saw the upside case, and really has not

2162
01:48:00.840 --> 01:48:03.119
<v Speaker 2>really earned targets at the level we saw over the

2163
01:48:03.119 --> 01:48:06.640
<v Speaker 2>second fl last year. It's pretty crowded there with Tillman,

2164
01:48:06.800 --> 01:48:11.640
<v Speaker 2>with Njoku, with Fannin. Jerome Ford's a little bit involved too.

2165
01:48:12.439 --> 01:48:16.439
<v Speaker 2>So I like Wandell, even though I don't think the

2166
01:48:16.479 --> 01:48:20.359
<v Speaker 2>matchup is great for Dart against this Charger's defense, but

2167
01:48:20.800 --> 01:48:24.199
<v Speaker 2>I think the volume and now the better usage from

2168
01:48:24.199 --> 01:48:27.439
<v Speaker 2>a downfield perspective makes me lean Wondo Robinson.

2169
01:48:27.800 --> 01:48:30.159
<v Speaker 1>The A dot for Robinson is not something I had

2170
01:48:30.199 --> 01:48:33.319
<v Speaker 1>on my Bengo card this year. Certainly, we have not

2171
01:48:33.479 --> 01:48:36.359
<v Speaker 1>seen him use like this since his days as a

2172
01:48:36.439 --> 01:48:39.199
<v Speaker 1>Kentucky Wildcat, and it's been very pleasant for us, so

2173
01:48:39.239 --> 01:48:41.239
<v Speaker 1>we would love to see it obviously, if we have

2174
01:48:41.319 --> 01:48:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Robinson on our team. Regarding the targets with Judy, he's

2175
01:48:44.560 --> 01:48:47.960
<v Speaker 1>gone eight eight five, only five targets against the Packers

2176
01:48:48.039 --> 01:48:49.800
<v Speaker 1>last week. He only caught one of those passes, but

2177
01:48:50.079 --> 01:48:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of a knockdown, slug it, slug it out,

2178
01:48:52.600 --> 01:48:55.279
<v Speaker 1>drag it out type game. And he goes to Detroit

2179
01:48:55.319 --> 01:48:56.880
<v Speaker 1>this week where I think they're going to be passing.

2180
01:48:56.920 --> 01:48:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But to your point, maybe it just means more for Fannin.

2181
01:49:00.000 --> 01:49:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it means more for Njoku and players like that. Tillman,

2182
01:49:03.359 --> 01:49:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you think about Jerome Ford and all these players that

2183
01:49:05.960 --> 01:49:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Flacco has been throwing to this year. I think I'm

2184
01:49:08.399 --> 01:49:11.439
<v Speaker 1>with you. I think I'm starting Robinson over Judy if

2185
01:49:11.479 --> 01:49:13.359
<v Speaker 1>for no other fact. And I always bring this back,

2186
01:49:13.359 --> 01:49:16.159
<v Speaker 1>and this is why I'm not a fantasy analyst. Fantasy

2187
01:49:16.159 --> 01:49:18.840
<v Speaker 1>football is supposed to be fun. I think Wandale Robinson

2188
01:49:18.880 --> 01:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>does a more fun start with Jackson Dart throwing to

2189
01:49:21.079 --> 01:49:23.319
<v Speaker 1>him this week over Jerry Judy. So that's the way

2190
01:49:23.359 --> 01:49:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I lean on that. Over to tight ends, Let's get

2191
01:49:27.439 --> 01:49:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to Nashville and talk about Chig a con Quo this week,

2192
01:49:32.399 --> 01:49:34.119
<v Speaker 1>a tight end that I think a lot of pundits

2193
01:49:34.159 --> 01:49:37.319
<v Speaker 1>out there are expecting bigger things, predicting bigger things for

2194
01:49:37.399 --> 01:49:40.119
<v Speaker 1>him as the season goes on. He gets a tough

2195
01:49:40.159 --> 01:49:44.800
<v Speaker 1>matchup in Houston this week against that Texans defense Brenton Strange,

2196
01:49:44.800 --> 01:49:47.119
<v Speaker 1>who's been very good so far for the Jaguars, especially

2197
01:49:47.159 --> 01:49:49.840
<v Speaker 1>last week six for sixty one, sixty two, something like that.

2198
01:49:50.399 --> 01:49:53.119
<v Speaker 1>He goes to San Francisco, so they're both on the road.

2199
01:49:53.399 --> 01:49:55.920
<v Speaker 1>You can only pick one. I feel like I'm leaning

2200
01:49:55.920 --> 01:49:58.800
<v Speaker 1>more towards Brenton Strange on this given his volume lately.

2201
01:50:00.119 --> 01:50:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Iyo Manners has still been getting a lot of targets

2202
01:50:02.960 --> 01:50:05.560
<v Speaker 1>for the Titans. Ridley's getting a lot of targets. He's

2203
01:50:05.600 --> 01:50:08.680
<v Speaker 1>not cashing in on him, and I guess the thing working.

2204
01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:11.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, Conquo's favor is cam Ward just refuses to

2205
01:50:11.920 --> 01:50:14.119
<v Speaker 1>throw to his running backs. But if you can only

2206
01:50:14.159 --> 01:50:16.399
<v Speaker 1>pick one this week and you have to start either

2207
01:50:16.439 --> 01:50:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Stranger or O Conquo Jack Miller from established the run,

2208
01:50:19.399 --> 01:50:20.600
<v Speaker 1>which way are you rolling?

2209
01:50:21.319 --> 01:50:24.760
<v Speaker 2>I'd also be going strange, mostly just as a function

2210
01:50:24.840 --> 01:50:27.439
<v Speaker 2>of the matchup. I mean, cam Ward has been he

2211
01:50:27.479 --> 01:50:30.319
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been bad, but I mean the Titans offense has

2212
01:50:30.359 --> 01:50:34.039
<v Speaker 2>has looked pretty bad overall, and this matchup on the

2213
01:50:34.119 --> 01:50:36.600
<v Speaker 2>road against Houston is just as bad as it gets

2214
01:50:36.600 --> 01:50:40.840
<v Speaker 2>for rookie quarterback. Easier matchup, first range, and so I'm

2215
01:50:40.840 --> 01:50:41.720
<v Speaker 2>going with strange.

2216
01:50:42.239 --> 01:50:45.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I got the Texans defense deployed in more than

2217
01:50:45.239 --> 01:50:47.319
<v Speaker 1>a few leagues this week, very excited to see what

2218
01:50:47.359 --> 01:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>they are able to do. Cam Ward is one of

2219
01:50:49.720 --> 01:50:51.640
<v Speaker 1>these I don't I'm not putting him in the Jamis

2220
01:50:51.640 --> 01:50:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Winston category yet, but he might ultimately fall there. I

2221
01:50:55.279 --> 01:50:57.119
<v Speaker 1>love the fact that this guy's always trying to make

2222
01:50:57.119 --> 01:51:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a play, constantly pumping the ball down. Feel well, that's

2223
01:51:00.560 --> 01:51:03.359
<v Speaker 1>what we want to see from fantasy quarterbacks, and quite frankly,

2224
01:51:03.399 --> 01:51:05.039
<v Speaker 1>it's what we want to see from our defense is

2225
01:51:05.039 --> 01:51:07.960
<v Speaker 1>when we're going up against quarterbacks like that as well.

2226
01:51:08.359 --> 01:51:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Sticking with the tight ends here, I'll get to another

2227
01:51:11.640 --> 01:51:13.680
<v Speaker 1>one that I think is probably only going to affect

2228
01:51:13.800 --> 01:51:17.439
<v Speaker 1>FFPC players looking to flex out a tight end this week?

2229
01:51:17.560 --> 01:51:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Would you play Dallas Goddard at Tampa or would you

2230
01:51:20.600 --> 01:51:24.119
<v Speaker 1>play JANEU Smith who is at well, I say at home.

2231
01:51:24.239 --> 01:51:28.359
<v Speaker 1>He's in Dublin across the pond against the Minnesota Vikings.

2232
01:51:28.520 --> 01:51:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Jenue Smith, John Smith beg your pardon or Dallas Goddard

2233
01:51:31.920 --> 01:51:34.640
<v Speaker 1>this week? Jack, I think it's very close between the two.

2234
01:51:35.000 --> 01:51:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Quite frankly, I think I roll with Goddard, but man,

2235
01:51:37.399 --> 01:51:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

2236
01:51:38.880 --> 01:51:41.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I go got her to. The pass

2237
01:51:41.279 --> 01:51:43.960
<v Speaker 2>volume for the Eagles has just been so bad, but

2238
01:51:44.039 --> 01:51:46.479
<v Speaker 2>I think the scoring up side for this team is

2239
01:51:46.560 --> 01:51:48.840
<v Speaker 2>just a lot higher than it is for Pittsburgh, and

2240
01:51:48.880 --> 01:51:51.880
<v Speaker 2>so often tight end production is just who falls into

2241
01:51:51.920 --> 01:51:54.199
<v Speaker 2>the end zone. And I think you can feel better

2242
01:51:54.199 --> 01:51:56.520
<v Speaker 2>about the Eagles putting out points as bad as it's

2243
01:51:56.560 --> 01:51:57.319
<v Speaker 2>been for them so far.

2244
01:51:57.479 --> 01:51:59.079
<v Speaker 3>Then Johnny Smith.

2245
01:52:00.439 --> 01:52:02.680
<v Speaker 1>The whole running thing that they're doing in Philly. I

2246
01:52:02.680 --> 01:52:05.560
<v Speaker 1>mean this is they can't continue to do this, right.

2247
01:52:05.600 --> 01:52:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're gonna see AJ Brown. We saw a

2248
01:52:07.760 --> 01:52:10.399
<v Speaker 1>J Brown bust out last week. But we're gonna see

2249
01:52:10.479 --> 01:52:13.079
<v Speaker 1>more consistent play from Brown and Smith and Hurts of

2250
01:52:13.119 --> 01:52:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the passing game, right or are we not? I don't.

2251
01:52:15.800 --> 01:52:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to think. I just get so

2252
01:52:17.880 --> 01:52:21.720
<v Speaker 1>fed up with watching how this Eagles team wins games

2253
01:52:21.760 --> 01:52:24.199
<v Speaker 1>this year. And God bless them. You know, they don't

2254
01:52:24.239 --> 01:52:26.920
<v Speaker 1>care about fantasy, nor should they. They're just all about

2255
01:52:26.920 --> 01:52:28.840
<v Speaker 1>winning games. But it has been annoying to watch.

2256
01:52:29.560 --> 01:52:33.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's not an athletically pleasing brand of football, but

2257
01:52:33.359 --> 01:52:35.720
<v Speaker 2>it works, and it worked for them. Last year. They

2258
01:52:36.079 --> 01:52:40.840
<v Speaker 2>were more pass heavy than they were last year. They

2259
01:52:40.880 --> 01:52:43.640
<v Speaker 2>were pass heavier last year, but it was mostly just

2260
01:52:43.680 --> 01:52:47.119
<v Speaker 2>from a volume standpoint. The past eight is not that different.

2261
01:52:47.560 --> 01:52:49.760
<v Speaker 2>It's just that they had more plays and had more

2262
01:52:49.800 --> 01:52:54.319
<v Speaker 2>total passing plays last year. They're not suddenly like running

2263
01:52:54.359 --> 01:52:57.319
<v Speaker 2>them all like significantly less than last year. So I

2264
01:52:57.319 --> 01:52:59.399
<v Speaker 2>think they play the pass long is gonna correct a

2265
01:52:59.439 --> 01:53:02.760
<v Speaker 2>little bit. I still think it's going to Bedlow's volume

2266
01:53:02.800 --> 01:53:06.640
<v Speaker 2>pass offense in football, but maybe closer to like twenty

2267
01:53:06.680 --> 01:53:08.920
<v Speaker 2>seven pass the times per game as opposed to twenty two,

2268
01:53:09.039 --> 01:53:12.000
<v Speaker 2>which makes a pretty sizable difference.

2269
01:53:12.119 --> 01:53:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Totally, especially when you're considering that a lot of people

2270
01:53:15.279 --> 01:53:18.840
<v Speaker 1>invested some serious draft capital in aj Brown, Demonta Smith,

2271
01:53:18.880 --> 01:53:21.119
<v Speaker 1>and quite frankly Saquon Barkley, who needs some of those

2272
01:53:21.159 --> 01:53:25.520
<v Speaker 1>catches as well. The first quarter has come to an end.

2273
01:53:26.279 --> 01:53:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray was sacked for eight in eight yard loss

2274
01:53:29.960 --> 01:53:32.760
<v Speaker 1>on second and seven, and then he runs for four

2275
01:53:32.880 --> 01:53:36.039
<v Speaker 1>yards on third and fifteen. When they resume on Prime Video,

2276
01:53:36.439 --> 01:53:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it will be with a Cardinals punt from their own

2277
01:53:38.840 --> 01:53:41.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, sending it back to Sam Darnold. We press

2278
01:53:41.920 --> 01:53:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on here, j G on YouTube right now, Jack wants

2279
01:53:45.880 --> 01:53:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to know if we would trade Bres Hall and the

2280
01:53:48.760 --> 01:53:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Monross Saint Brown in exchange for Jamar Chase and Devon

2281
01:53:52.680 --> 01:53:56.000
<v Speaker 1>h Chant. Now, Brice Hall, certainly, I think things are

2282
01:53:56.000 --> 01:53:59.920
<v Speaker 1>looking up for him. This coronation of Braylen Allen that

2283
01:54:00.039 --> 01:54:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people saw happening during drafting season certainly

2284
01:54:03.960 --> 01:54:06.800
<v Speaker 1>has not happened. You have a Monross Saint Brown who

2285
01:54:06.840 --> 01:54:09.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people said the ascension of Jamison Williams

2286
01:54:09.279 --> 01:54:11.479
<v Speaker 1>was going to happen this year under the new John

2287
01:54:11.520 --> 01:54:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Morton offense, it was gonna be a Williams offense rather

2288
01:54:15.159 --> 01:54:19.039
<v Speaker 1>than a Saint Brown offense. That has been widely exaggerated

2289
01:54:19.079 --> 01:54:21.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. So you have Bresol and Saint Brown here

2290
01:54:22.119 --> 01:54:25.680
<v Speaker 1>on one side. You have Jamar Chase, who obviously will

2291
01:54:25.680 --> 01:54:27.479
<v Speaker 1>take a bit of a hit, not a strong hit

2292
01:54:27.520 --> 01:54:30.159
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion. In the move from Burrow to Browning,

2293
01:54:30.239 --> 01:54:32.279
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a lot of these backup quarterbacks able to

2294
01:54:32.359 --> 01:54:35.800
<v Speaker 1>keep that number one option not only a float, but thriving.

2295
01:54:36.039 --> 01:54:38.479
<v Speaker 1>And then Devon ah Chan, who is the ultimate wildcard.

2296
01:54:38.520 --> 01:54:40.479
<v Speaker 1>And maybe this trade hinges on what you think is

2297
01:54:40.479 --> 01:54:43.199
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen with eight Chan and that Dolphins offense. I'm

2298
01:54:43.239 --> 01:54:46.439
<v Speaker 1>still bullish on him for whatever reason, even when that

2299
01:54:46.560 --> 01:54:49.159
<v Speaker 1>offensive line is bad, even when the offense in general

2300
01:54:49.279 --> 01:54:52.079
<v Speaker 1>is bad. Ah Chant always seems to be doing numbers.

2301
01:54:52.720 --> 01:54:55.600
<v Speaker 1>He's been very efficient both in the running game and

2302
01:54:55.640 --> 01:54:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in the passing game. This is a coin flip for me.

2303
01:54:58.600 --> 01:55:00.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to figure out which side I'd rather have.

2304
01:55:00.720 --> 01:55:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's chasing Chan, but man, it's close.

2305
01:55:04.520 --> 01:55:07.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I spent that whole time thinking about this because

2306
01:55:07.119 --> 01:55:10.960
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't sure either. I prefer Amira to Chase, and

2307
01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:14.399
<v Speaker 2>I prefer Hn to Breeze. I think for me, the

2308
01:55:14.479 --> 01:55:17.039
<v Speaker 2>gap between the running backs is bigger than the gap

2309
01:55:17.039 --> 01:55:19.720
<v Speaker 2>between the wide receivers, and so I Aileen Chase and

2310
01:55:19.840 --> 01:55:23.159
<v Speaker 2>h N as well. But I think this is one

2311
01:55:23.199 --> 01:55:26.560
<v Speaker 2>of the fairest trades we've talked about so far.

2312
01:55:27.199 --> 01:55:29.880
<v Speaker 1>So JG hopefully that helps out, helps you out. Jack

2313
01:55:29.880 --> 01:55:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and I are both signing off on this deal to

2314
01:55:31.680 --> 01:55:34.399
<v Speaker 1>trade Hall and Saint Brown and get Chase in Chen

2315
01:55:34.880 --> 01:55:37.079
<v Speaker 1>and go with God on this. We'll see what happens.

2316
01:55:37.680 --> 01:55:39.560
<v Speaker 1>We have wrapped up the tight end discussion. Want to

2317
01:55:39.560 --> 01:55:42.239
<v Speaker 1>get to a couple more start since at the quarterback position.

2318
01:55:42.279 --> 01:55:44.600
<v Speaker 1>A couple of players that we've talked about a little

2319
01:55:44.640 --> 01:55:46.800
<v Speaker 1>bit tonight but never compared him to each other a

2320
01:55:46.880 --> 01:55:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Monro Saint Brown's teammate Jared Goff this week at home

2321
01:55:50.640 --> 01:55:53.800
<v Speaker 1>against the Cleveland Browns. Would you play him? Or would

2322
01:55:53.800 --> 01:55:57.319
<v Speaker 1>you play Gino Smith? At home against the Chicago Bears.

2323
01:55:57.560 --> 01:55:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Not that I'm trying to poison your mind here, J,

2324
01:56:00.479 --> 01:56:03.199
<v Speaker 1>but the Lions are ten point favorites against the Bounds

2325
01:56:03.319 --> 01:56:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in a total featuring forty four and a half points.

2326
01:56:07.119 --> 01:56:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Whereas you look at the Bears and the Steelers. I

2327
01:56:09.840 --> 01:56:13.199
<v Speaker 1>beg your pardon. The Bears and the Raiders. Raiders are

2328
01:56:13.199 --> 01:56:15.239
<v Speaker 1>one and a half point favorites, and it is a

2329
01:56:15.319 --> 01:56:18.640
<v Speaker 1>forty seven and a half point total. Spoiler alert. I

2330
01:56:18.640 --> 01:56:22.239
<v Speaker 1>think I'm leaning towards Geno Smith here, but you are

2331
01:56:22.239 --> 01:56:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a pervasive man, persuasive man, so maybe you can sell

2332
01:56:25.560 --> 01:56:27.520
<v Speaker 1>me it is it is at home for Jared Goff

2333
01:56:27.560 --> 01:56:29.880
<v Speaker 1>where he plays really, really well at least.

2334
01:56:30.680 --> 01:56:33.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I think I tilt towards Gino too.

2335
01:56:33.479 --> 01:56:36.439
<v Speaker 2>I think this one's really close because the Lions should

2336
01:56:36.439 --> 01:56:38.239
<v Speaker 2>be able to put up points, but I think it's

2337
01:56:38.239 --> 01:56:41.359
<v Speaker 2>more likely that the Raiders are passing than the Lions

2338
01:56:41.760 --> 01:56:43.520
<v Speaker 2>might be able to just sit on sit on a

2339
01:56:43.640 --> 01:56:47.039
<v Speaker 2>lead with with David Montgomery and Gibbs. So this one's

2340
01:56:47.039 --> 01:56:48.760
<v Speaker 2>pretty close for me, but i'm Geno as well.

2341
01:56:49.479 --> 01:56:54.359
<v Speaker 1>An implied point total of twenty seven for the Detroit Lions.

2342
01:56:54.439 --> 01:56:58.560
<v Speaker 1>As I look at the the Raiders, it looks like

2343
01:56:58.560 --> 01:57:03.079
<v Speaker 1>about twenty five twenty six implied point total for Las

2344
01:57:03.199 --> 01:57:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Vegas as well, so it's very close. Listen, I think

2345
01:57:06.960 --> 01:57:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you can go with Golf if you want to here,

2346
01:57:08.920 --> 01:57:11.439
<v Speaker 1>but I lean towards Geno Smith as does my good

2347
01:57:11.439 --> 01:57:14.439
<v Speaker 1>buddy Jack Miller Final one tonight, and I'll bring this up.

2348
01:57:15.359 --> 01:57:18.239
<v Speaker 1>My bust of the year on my local fantasy football

2349
01:57:18.239 --> 01:57:22.159
<v Speaker 1>show was Baker Mayfield, Jack and a lot of the reason,

2350
01:57:22.279 --> 01:57:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was a multiple multitude of reasons that

2351
01:57:24.439 --> 01:57:26.359
<v Speaker 1>went into that. I just feel like this dude was

2352
01:57:26.359 --> 01:57:28.880
<v Speaker 1>punching above his weight last year. I think about where

2353
01:57:28.920 --> 01:57:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you had to pick him and drafts. This year, I

2354
01:57:30.640 --> 01:57:35.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't think he was worth it, and I don't like

2355
01:57:35.680 --> 01:57:39.279
<v Speaker 1>him this week against Philadelphia. However, I can't deny what

2356
01:57:39.359 --> 01:57:41.680
<v Speaker 1>he's been able to do from a fantasy standpoint so

2357
01:57:41.760 --> 01:57:44.119
<v Speaker 1>far this year. He's looked very good. I think he's

2358
01:57:44.119 --> 01:57:46.479
<v Speaker 1>tied for second in the NFL and touchdown passes, so

2359
01:57:46.520 --> 01:57:49.520
<v Speaker 1>he's certainly up at the top of certain metrics, maybe

2360
01:57:49.560 --> 01:57:52.760
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom or in the middle of some other metrics.

2361
01:57:52.880 --> 01:57:55.760
<v Speaker 1>If you had a decision between Mayfield and bow Nicks

2362
01:57:55.800 --> 01:58:01.439
<v Speaker 1>this week, who bow Nicks is obviously playing against the

2363
01:58:01.479 --> 01:58:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bengals on the second Monday night football game. I

2364
01:58:04.279 --> 01:58:06.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't mentioned that yet as well. There's two Monday Night

2365
01:58:06.880 --> 01:58:10.039
<v Speaker 1>games this week, but bo Nick's a really good matchup

2366
01:58:10.039 --> 01:58:12.760
<v Speaker 1>against the Cincinnati Bengals. Baker Mayfield not a great matchup

2367
01:58:12.760 --> 01:58:15.239
<v Speaker 1>against Philly. Who would you rather start this week as

2368
01:58:15.239 --> 01:58:16.720
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback, Mayfield or Nicks.

2369
01:58:17.720 --> 01:58:21.439
<v Speaker 2>I think, just based on matchup, it's Nicks. I think

2370
01:58:21.479 --> 01:58:24.359
<v Speaker 2>in general i'd rather have it. It's definitely Baker. But

2371
01:58:24.439 --> 01:58:27.079
<v Speaker 2>I think just this is pretty much the best possible

2372
01:58:27.079 --> 01:58:30.439
<v Speaker 2>matchup or second best behind Dallas, and almost the worst

2373
01:58:30.439 --> 01:58:33.800
<v Speaker 2>possible matchup for Baker, So I go Nicks here. There

2374
01:58:33.880 --> 01:58:35.920
<v Speaker 2>was also some weird stuff with Baker today where he

2375
01:58:36.079 --> 01:58:38.720
<v Speaker 2>was like dropping back at practice but they wouldn't let

2376
01:58:38.760 --> 01:58:39.159
<v Speaker 2>him throw.

2377
01:58:40.520 --> 01:58:43.279
<v Speaker 3>Called it like a bicep. I assume he's gonna play.

2378
01:58:43.640 --> 01:58:47.960
<v Speaker 2>He's He's had worse stuff and not not miss time,

2379
01:58:48.039 --> 01:58:49.920
<v Speaker 2>but I I just something to keep an eye out.

2380
01:58:50.520 --> 01:58:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I do remember him shaking his throwing hand quite a

2381
01:58:53.800 --> 01:58:56.000
<v Speaker 1>bit in that last game last week, so I wonder

2382
01:58:56.000 --> 01:58:58.079
<v Speaker 1>if that has something to do. I don't know, but

2383
01:58:58.119 --> 01:59:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you're right, I think i'd be between these two. I'd

2384
01:59:01.039 --> 01:59:03.239
<v Speaker 1>rather have Mayfield on my roster the rest of the way,

2385
01:59:03.279 --> 01:59:06.560
<v Speaker 1>but definitely I'm playing Nicks over Mayfield this week for sure.

2386
01:59:07.199 --> 01:59:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's going to do it for our show tonight, Jack,

2387
01:59:08.880 --> 01:59:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Before we let you get out of here and enjoy

2388
01:59:10.439 --> 01:59:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the rest of this game, as we still have a

2389
01:59:14.159 --> 01:59:16.239
<v Speaker 1>seven to three ball game fourteen minutes ago in the

2390
01:59:16.239 --> 01:59:21.920
<v Speaker 1>first half. The established the Run dot com website is

2391
01:59:22.119 --> 01:59:25.520
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable as far as the analysis that you guys provide

2392
01:59:25.800 --> 01:59:29.000
<v Speaker 1>everything that you're giving to your subscribers. The podcast obviously

2393
01:59:29.039 --> 01:59:32.760
<v Speaker 1>awesome as well. At Jack Miller's zero two on X,

2394
01:59:32.800 --> 01:59:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us sort of what your specialty is

2395
01:59:34.920 --> 01:59:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and what you're going to be working on in the

2396
01:59:36.279 --> 01:59:37.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five season for ETR.

2397
01:59:38.880 --> 01:59:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm working on the productions for ETR along with

2398
01:59:43.239 --> 01:59:46.399
<v Speaker 2>Leoni and Mark Dankinbring, so I'll be doing that a

2399
01:59:46.439 --> 01:59:46.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of the time.

2400
01:59:47.000 --> 01:59:48.119
<v Speaker 3>Then I also have some content.

2401
01:59:48.600 --> 01:59:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I have an article every week that comes out on

2402
01:59:50.720 --> 01:59:54.439
<v Speaker 2>Tuesday morning, just going through the biggest usage notes that

2403
01:59:54.479 --> 01:59:59.039
<v Speaker 2>I see from the previous week, and that's that's pretty

2404
01:59:59.119 --> 02:00:00.600
<v Speaker 2>much pretty much it.

2405
02:00:01.279 --> 02:00:04.279
<v Speaker 1>So, yeah, and anything. If you want to see Jack

2406
02:00:04.279 --> 02:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on any ETR podcast, obviously subscribe to the ETR podcast

2407
02:00:08.039 --> 02:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>feed anywhere you get your podcasts, or just go to

2408
02:00:10.960 --> 02:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>X dot com slash Jack Miller zero two and anytime

2409
02:00:13.680 --> 02:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>he is on a new ETR podcast, you're gonna find

2410
02:00:16.079 --> 02:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>it right there as well. I always appreciate our conversations dude,

2411
02:00:19.439 --> 02:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>be good and let's do this again soon for sure.

2412
02:00:22.319 --> 02:00:23.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thanks for having me on.

2413
02:00:23.840 --> 02:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>My FFPC dot com is ready to go for the

2414
02:00:25.600 --> 02:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>weekly challenge went up to twenty five hundred dollars, no draft,

2415
02:00:28.720 --> 02:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>no salary cap, super simple, just pick your players at

2416
02:00:31.520 --> 02:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>my FFPC dot com. We'll be back at seven o'clock

2417
02:00:34.880 --> 02:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>next Thursday. Optimus Fantasy ch Terms joins us for the

2418
02:00:38.159 --> 02:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>forty nine Ers and Rams next Thursday night. I'll mention

2419
02:00:41.279 --> 02:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>this again. Two Monday night kickoffs this week seven fifteen,

2420
02:00:44.600 --> 02:00:47.079
<v Speaker 1>eight fifteen Eastern Time, and a nine to thirty am

2421
02:00:47.159 --> 02:00:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Eastern time kickoff in Dublin for the Vikings and Steelers.

2422
02:00:50.359 --> 02:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>God bless a fifteen hour day of fantasy football on

2423
02:00:53.760 --> 02:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Sunday gonna be awesome. For our producer Sean Engel and

2424
02:00:57.640 --> 02:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for Jack Miller from Established the morn I have been

2425
02:00:59.760 --> 02:01:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Eric Awkman. This has been the f f PC Insider

2426
02:01:02.479 --> 02:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>Access show on the Better Sports Network. See again next

2427
02:01:05.039 --> 02:01:06.199
<v Speaker 1>week and enjoy Week four.

2428
02:01:24.000 --> 02:01:24.239
<v Speaker 3>Thanks
