Speaker 1: Welcome to the Three Stories version of The Todd Herman Show.
Story number one Katangie Brown Jackson and Barack Obama black
on black mental abusers. Story number two. The Godfather of
Vaccines tells on himself in story number three, if Jesus
was okay with same sex activity, he would have said
that because Jesus was not shy talk about this all
with the help of God Almighty.
Speaker 2: The Todd Herman Show is one hundred percent disapproved by
big pharma technocrats and tyrants everywhere from the high mountains
of Free American. Here's the Emerald City exile Todd Herman.
Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made in. These
are the times through which God has decided we shall live.
How would you describe Kitangy Brown Jackson and Barack Cussin Obama?
Now they are different people. Barack Cussin Obama is clever
and smart and plotting and charismatic, or he used to be.
He's in that fat Elvis stage of charisma now where
it's stale and old and the act is old and
it doesn't work anymore and the fake pauses and the
fake thoughtfulness. People have caught onto that that this is
just part of shtick Obama stick Katangi Brown Jackson, how
would you describe her? I mean, the easy way to
describe her is what she is. She's a dei placement
on the Supreme Court. She's there because she is black,
which she agrees with that, so she has a lot
more melanin in her skin than a lot of folks have,
so darker shades. And because she's a woman, which is
something with which Katangi Brown Jackson doesn't necessarily agree, because
Katangi Brown Jackson famously testifies that she has no idea
what a woman is. But how would you describe these
two liars? Okay, secrets of power, fair enough, socialists, great
maoists even better. But you know what they really are
is they are black on black mental abusers. That's what
they are. They are black people abusing the minds of
black people. This is Katangi Brown Jackson, and she is
asking questions and having an interaction at Supreme Court case
about Louisiana's redistricting. What Kittangi Brown Jackson wants is to
have another all black districts, a district voting district created
based solely upon the topic of race. Kit Tangi brown
Jackson learns during this hearing that black Democrats don't vote
for black candidates in Louisiana. Kittangi brown Jackson did not
ask the question what are the quality of the candidates?
Are they good candidates? Do they have positions that appeal
to voters in the state of Louisiana or are they
hardcore pressives that Democrats in Louisiana not being hardcore progressives
can't stand. Are they performative, they have any experience, or
are they simply DEI candidates like she Cantandy brown Jackson
is a DEI Supreme Court justice. She doesn't ask any
of those questions. She doesn't care that there's no proof
at all that any of this has anything to do
with racism. She simply wants an outcome, and that outcome
is to have an all black district because only by
having all black districts can you get black people elected.
This is the black on black mental abuse. She's telling
Black Americans, white people hate you so much, even white
Democrats won't vote for you. So here's Katandy brown Jackson
in this exchange, and she is effectively saying, in fact
says at the end of this that black voters are disabled.
Speaker 3: I guess I'm thinking of it of the fact that
remedial action absent discriminatory and is really not a new idea.
Speaker 1: So absent discriminatory intent, remedial action forcing people to do
some things to remediate an issue is not unusual, even
if there's no actual racism involved or actual intent to discriminate.
Got that. Keep that in mind as she gets to
her clothes of her statement. Here, let's go back to
the dei higher Tangi Brown Jackson.
Speaker 3: In the civil rights laws, and my kind of paradigmatic
example of this is something like the.
Speaker 1: ADA American Americans with Disabilities Act. My godmother helped write that.
She is a conservative Catholic, Christian, Jesus centered Catholic. She
helped write this because as a teacher in college professor,
she saw people not able to get into her buildings.
So it's a well intended piece. No one ever said
people built buildings to be discriminatory. But people could not
get into the buildings. This is an important distinction. They
could not get into libraries or hospitals or bakeries. This
is an important distinction that Catangi Brown Jackson then just
a racist and doesn't care about, then, she continues.
Speaker 3: Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act against the backdrop
of a world that was generally not accessible to people
with disabilities, and so it was discriminatory in effect because
these folks were not able to access these buildings, and
it didn't matter whether the person who built the building
or the person who owned the building intended for them
to be exclusionary.
Speaker 1: That's irrelevant.
Speaker 3: Congress said, the facilities have to be made equally open
to people with disabilities, if readily possible. I guess I
don't understand why that's not what's happening here. The idea
in section two is that we are responding to current
day manifestations of past and present decisions that disadvantage minorities
and make it so that they don't have equal access
to the voting system. Right, they're disabled. In fact, we
use the word disabled in Milligan.
Speaker 1: We say that's a way they're disabled. Just this thick
of how far this mental abuser has to twist this stuff.
Are black people able to fill in a box on
an envelope saying I vote for this person on a
paper in an envelope and then sign it and then
send it. Because it doesn't require postage. I mean mail
in balloting is an utter fraud. It's an imitation for fraud.
It is walking, breathing, talking vote fraud. And black people
can do that, just like black people can get IDs
and driver's licenses and bank accounts and much of the
segritted people like Joe Biden and Cami Harris. They could
even sign up for an AOL account. So she says
that they don't have access to the voting systems, but
they do. So she's taking a districting issue and pretending
it's an access issue. She has to do this because
she's a mental abuser. She can't say that there are
candidates that are running who happen to be black, who
also happened to be insanely unlikable. Take for instance, Cammi Harris.
She was so unlikable she couldn't get to one percent
in the Democrat primary when she ran against the figurehead.
She was so unlikable they wouldn't even have a Democrat convention.
I mean they had the convention, but not the vote.
It's not a single vote for that woman. So where
black people denied voting access, then yes, much more than
they are in Louisiana where they can and do vote.
In fact, the trunout for black voters in the South
has increased. Praise God. I guess if they're educated voters.
I happen to think that white black whoever, if you're
not educated, you should stay home. That's just me. So
that's Catangi Brown Jackson. One example of this. Another is
brock Hussein Obama, who recognizes that AOC being the spokesperson
for the Democrats and once again Bernie Sanders being the
spokesperson or Nancy Pelosi or Gavin Newsom is killing his
grift machine, the Democrat Party. So he's once again pushing
himself back up into the national spot slight and likewise
abusing black voters mentally, black on black mental abuse. I'll
show it to mean here in a second. You know,
there's good things that come out of the liberal States.
Alan soaps comes out of California. We're about to talk
about California with Barack Obama sticking his nose into this.
The good thing that came out of there is world
class soap that has some advantages over the soaps that
are world class brands. So there's brands of soap that
are world class, instantly recognizable, such as you get Dove
Boom instantly recognized. Where's it made and who makes it?
How many chemicals are in it? What's their position on DEI?
Did they give money to the chemical and surgical abuse
of kids? Alan Soaps doesn't. Where's Alan Soaps made? It's
made in the Midwest in the United States of America.
Who makes it? A family? How long have they done it?
Three generations? Are the chemicals in it? None? Is it
gentle in your skin? Absolutely? Are the fragrances unique?
Speaker 2: Yes?
Speaker 1: Does it come in non fragrance yep? Does it have
a mission beyond soap Absolutely, to employ people like Alan
who the rest of the world wanted to have been
unalived in the womb. Does he work there today yep,
every single day, quality control, packaging, inventing new soaps. As
brother works there as well. Both of these boys would
be turned away from employers. Can I buy it? Yep?
Alan Soaps dot Com slash tod They get special discount.
You do. You get ten percent off all the products
there and if you love it, then subscribe and continue
to support a company that supports the fact that all
lives matter. It's Alan Soaps dot Com slash Todd. So
Barack Ussain Obama knows he cannot allow the current crop
of the squad elin Omar to be the face of
the Democrat Party. He can't allow that. He can't allow
Nancy Pelosi to do this. That frightens everybody. So Barack
Obama sticking his nose back into politics. Here's Obama talking
about Proposition fifty in the state of California. The message
here being we can't continue to let Republicans decide how
we vote in California.
Speaker 4: Like many of you, I've become increasingly concerned about the
rising wave of authoritarianism sweeping the globe. We're seeing politicians
target civil society, undermind freedom of the press, weaponize the
justice system, and no one is being spared. Even countries
that thought they were immune from wholesale assaults on democracy
now understand. We're all part of this struggle. That's an
enormous challenge, but it also means we can learn from
each other. I recently sat down with three leaders who
are part of the Obama Foundation's Alumni network to discuss
their work in Hungary and Poland to countries on the
leading edge of confronting autocracy. People like Stephania Sandor and Susanna.
They give me hope.
Speaker 1: So he goes and talks about the Obama Foundation, wanting
to make sure that we don't fall into tyranny. This,
of course, the guy who used the justice system tyrannically
to go spy on Trump Land, tyrannically to put in
prison some of his employees and team members, tyrannically use
our system to block the prosecution of drug gangs bringing
heroin into our country. Tyrannically decided to against the law
give Iran hundreds of billions of dollars. During the same
set Shin Barack Obama recorded a message about California, about
this hyperpartisan bill, this this Prop fifty, that he's deeply,
deeply against California.
Speaker 4: The whole nation is counting on you. Democracy is on
the ballot November four.
Speaker 5: Uh huh.
Speaker 4: Republicans want to steal enough seats in Congress to rig
the next election and wield unchecked power for two more years.
Prop fifty You can stop Republicans in their tracks. Prop
fifty puts our elections back on a level playing field,
preserved independent redistricting over the long term, and lets the
people decide return your ballot today, vote yes on fifty.
Speaker 1: Barack Obama telling black people again, Republicans tend to intend
to come and steal the elections. Look at the visuals
and the ads. That's exactly what this is meant to do.
This unchecked power that Trump has, you know, while the
government shut down while he wants it open. This unchecked
power he has where he's being told now by a
rogue judge in California that he doesn't have the right
to fire people from the executive branch because she finds
it icky that unchecked power. See baracos in Obama is
transmitting all of this when the fact is California has
independent redistricting. They voted it in Prop fifty undoes this.
And you don't have to go far into California, far
into Los Angeles to see the effects of Democrat policies
on black families. Simply go look at their black on
black crime. They're black on black victimization. Black perpetrators were
victimizing black young people. You don't have to look forward
to see that. Barack Obama and Catangi Brown Jackson are
a lot of things. Their duplicitus, their liars, Catangi Brown
Jackson is unqualified for anything. They are also perpetrators of
black on black mental abuse. And may God forgive them
for that, because he's going to have to if they
want any future story Number two, the Godfather of vaccines
tells on himself, there's a guy who is known in
the world of I'm gonna do this. I'll do this
as with a as least venom as I can, a
little venom as I can. The public health world, there's
no such thing as public health. Okay, I'll try this again.
Let me try this again. The reason I say there's
no such thing as public health is because health is
based on an individual series of decisions that can add
up into a healthy or non healthy public population. Public
health extends only, I think, to access to health. That's it.
I don't think public health well, I mean the prevention
of DC's disease. Now, maybe we could invent, say a
civil or federal organization that actually prevented disease. We should
try that, but it would actually have to be involved in,
say preventing really obvious disease like metabolic disorder or obesity,
or addictions to insulent highs that you get through eating garbage.
I can't do it. See, I cannot do this without venom.
Let me try again, shake it out. Public health authorities
consider a doctor by the name of Stanley Platkin to
be the godfather of vaccines. So he was at the
forefront of the invention of some of the most important
vaccines in history. And this is this is a deposition.
It's part of a deposition where doctor Plotkin had to
sit down with Aaron Siri, a lawyer works for RFK
Junior's organization, works with del big Tree. He had to
sit down and answer questions under oath about these vaccines
and how safe they are. He's the godfather vaccines. Now,
I'm not going to make any intro judgment at all
about these vaccines, but I want you to judge if
this guy is telling the truth about their safety and
efficacy based upon noble science, the result of scientific analysis,
the result of having a thesis and then attempting to
falsify that thesis, in this case, through actual physical tests
biological tests, in other words, actually examining the effects of
these drugs. So I'll show you this in a second,
and then you be the judge. Because the data tells
the story. There's data in all stories. Your retirement story
right now is predicated upon some data. What's in your
bank account now, your retirement account, now, how's it expected
to grow? What are you going to need to retire?
And that could be a lock story. You could go
look at your investments now, look at your profit loss,
et cetera, and that story could change on a dime,
particularly if you are not set up to handle risk
or being risk managed. My friend Zach Abraham, chief investment
officer Bulwark Management, will meet with you three times, no obligation,
absolutely free, figure out if you guys like each other,
to look at your portfolios, to come back and see
if his company can help you. And he may well
tell you, you know what, you're in such a good position,
don't you dare make a change? That feel pretty good.
On the other hand, he might come along and say,
you know what, I don't think you're being risk managed.
I think you could find your retirement fund of virtually
disappearing with what's set up now, I don't think it's
being actively managed. It can tell you all these things
and then show you how Bulwark can help you have
the secure retirement you need. This is a free service
and there's no obligation. Just go sign up at Know
Your riskpodcast dot com. That's Know Your Risk Podcast dot com.
Investment Advisors Services is off their truck Financial LLC and
sec Register Investment Advisor. Investments involved risk can are not
guaranteed pastforum sayn't guarantee future results Truck twenty five Dash
two nine eight. So here is the Godfather of vaccines,
Doctor Stanley Potkin, under cross examination by lawyer Aaron Siri.
Speaker 5: When you look at the clinical trials that were done
pre licensure for Comma VACSHP, how long does it say
that safety was monitored after each dose?
Speaker 1: Let's see is paging through the research. Five days.
Speaker 5: It's five days long enough to detect an order immune
issue that arises after five days. No, it's five days
long enough to detect any neurological disorder that arose from
the vaccine after five days. No, there is no control group.
Speaker 6: Correct, It does not mention any control group.
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 5: If you turn to section six point two under the
Nervous system disorders, it states that there have been reports
of Giambarre syndrome correct, as well as multiple sclerosis exacerbation
of multiple sclerosis. My life, including transversemilitis seizure, febril seizure,
periphone neuropathy including Bell's palsy, muscle weakness, hypothesia, and encephalitis. Correct. Correct, Okay.
Speaker 6: Now important that before you go on how these reports
are required to be included because they have been reported
to the authorities as happening after vaccination. That is not
proof that the vaccine caused those reactions.
Speaker 1: The question here is should people be told about this?
The question here is is this scientifically robust? Is this
data driven? The question here is should we have control groups?
Should we monitor the effects of vaccines for more than
five days or not? Can you say something is safe
and effect I would you stop monitoring it? On the
sixth day story number three, if Jesus Christ was okay
with same sex activity, he would have said that. Now
you could say this about a lot of things from
the Bible. If Jesus wanted an NFL football, it would
have said, hey, and I therefore say there will be
football games. Jesus didn't dwell in the realm of Hey,
let's go out and create some fun games for people.
Jesus dwelt in the realm of building the Kingdom of
Heaven telling people the repent of sins for the Kingdom
of Heaven was near. That was him bringing the Kingdom
of Heaven, because he is, in fact God, Almighty, part
of the Triune God had. As he walked around, God
was walking around, the Kingdom of Heaven was walking around.
He gave us an opportunity to repent of our sins,
to accept them as our Lord and savior, to be
changed by him. And then when he went back to
Heaven to have with us the holy spirits. That's an
incredible thing, the Kingdom of Heaven within us. That was
his gig. It was not about, hey, let's have NFL
football or maybe one day there'll be an Internet something
like that. Jesus if he had noticed that the Pharisees were, say,
enforcing laws against sexual activity in the wrong way, Jesus
would have corrected that. Because Jesus was not shy about
correcting the Pharisees. He wasn't shy at all. I even
went to kind of against my I guess better, Angels,
I went to AI to ask this question. In this case,
I asked Grok and yeah, I checked this against the Bible,
because I don't trust AI. But I'm going to give
you some examples of where Jesus corrected the Pharisees, because
Jesus was not shy of correcting the Pharisees. They were
the ones who pretended to hold the keys to heaven.
They were the ones acting like God Almighty. And sometimes
the Pharisees took things through too far or not far enough,
and Jesus corrected them. So i'll show you this in
a second. You should correct something of a coming catastrophe.
If you don't correct it, you could get sued as
a business owner. And it could be you did nothing wrong.
It could be that you get someone who's a disgruntled
an employee they want to sue. It could be that
they did not get enough workers comp when they did
get hurt on the job, and so they sue. It
could be that a competitor sues. This is the sort
of society. It could be lawfare, or it could be
God forbid. You experience a really tough loss of your
business and you've been running on a corporate credit line
you're probably counting on. If God forbid that happens, that
at least you know the only thing in exposure are
the assets held by your business, your equipment, the money
in your accounts that no lawyer or bank could get
at your home, or your equity or your retirement account
or your stock account. That may not be true. You
could be in business fifteen years and if you have
not established actual corporate credit, it's not true. You don't
have the corporate veil. So take me up on a
free offer, a free no obligation consultation with my friends
at bisible bi zab l e Bisible. The website is
gobisible dot com. They will tell you if you have
the corporate veil or not. If you do, hey, praise God,
go about your business. If you don't, Bisible will offer
to fix it for you in seven easy steps. And
by the way, the money you'll spend on that, that's
clown show, easy decision, the risk reward ratio there is
all on the side of getting this done and taken
care of. It's gobisible dot com. So Jesus was not
shy about correcting the Pharisees. And this is what I
asked Grock about Jesus correcting the Pharisees. Grock writes, Jesus
correction of the Pharisees application of Old Testament law. The Pharisees,
as religious leaders in the first century Judaism, were known
for their strict adherence to the Mosaic Law and their
extensive oral traditions, which they believe clarified and expanded upon it. However,
Jesus frequently challenged their application of Old Testament law, emphasizing
its true intent over their legalistic interpretations. This paper explores
key instances where Jesus corrected the pharisees misunderstandings, drawing from
the Gospel accounts to highlight his teachings on the spirit
of law. So when he's where they're talking about the
oral tradition, expanding or clarifying. In other words, they added
to the Bible the thing we're told not to do.
We're not to add or subtract to the Bible. So
the Pharisees already screwed up. So this is some examples
that Groc wrote into this paper. One Sabbath observance, prioritizing
mercy over ritual. The Pharisees rigidly enforced Sabbath laws, viewing
any activity resembling work as a violation. Jesus confronted this
in several instances, healing on the Sabbath Mark twelve nine
through fourteen, Mark three one through six, Luke thirteen ten
through seventeen. When the Pharisees criticized Jesus for healing a
man with a weathered hand or a woman bent over,
Jesus responded, is it lawful to do good on the
Sabbath or to do evil? Or to save life or
to unlive a person? He emphasized that the Sabbath was
ma made for human benefits, not to hinder acts of mercy.
The Pharisees focus on prohibiting work missed the law's purpose
of promoting human flourishing. My Father desires mercy, not sacrifice.
Disciples plucking grain Matthew chapter twelve, verses one through eight.
When the Pharisees accused Jesus disciple of breaking the Sabbath
by plucking grain, Jesus cited David's example of eating consecrated bread.
First Samuel twenty one, verses one through six declared the
son of Man is the lord of the Sabbath Matthew
twelve eight. He also referenced Hoseiah sixty six. I desire mercy,
not sacrifice, showing that compassion supersedes ritualistic observations. Correction, Jesus
taught that the Sabbath was intended to serve humanity, not
enslave it to rules. Pharisees legalism neglected the law's deeper
call to love and mercy, so he said that the
Sabbath was made for man, not man. For the Sabbath
ritual purity in a righteousness over external observance, the Pharisees
emphasize external rituals such as hand washing before meals, as
extensions of purity laws. In Mark seven one one through
twenty three, they criticized jesus disciples for eating with unwashed hands,
and Jesus rebuked them, quoting Isaiah twenty nine thirteen, This
people honors me with their lips, but their heart is
far from me. He explained that true defilement comes from
the heart, evil thoughts, malice, and sin, not only from
the external impurities like unwashed hands. Correction, Jesus redirected the
focus from external rituals to internal transformation, aligning with the
Old Testament's call for a circumcised heart. Deuterrotomy, Chapter ten,
verse sixteen. The Pharisees' obsession with outward purity missed the
law's aim to foster genuine holiness. Jesus also, by the way,
called the Pharisees whitewashed tombs, looking clean and fancy on
the outside, but dirty and filthy on the inside. In
the case of divorce, Jesus talked about this again, correcting
the Pharisees. In divorce, he'd heard it said you should
give your wife a certificate of divorce. Jesus cleared this up.
The Pharisees questioned Jesus about divorce, citing Deuterotomy twenty four
one through four, which permitted a certificate of divorce Matthew
Chapter nineteen, verse three through nine. They interpret this broadly,
allowing divorce for trivial reasons. Jesus counter by pointing to
Genesis two twenty four, emphasizing God's original intent for marriage
as lifelong union. He clarified that Moses allowed divorce due
to Israel's hardness of heart, but this was not God's ideal.
Jesus restored the law intended to protect the sanctity of marriage,
challenging the Pharisees' lenient application that undermined conventional fidelity. But
it did help men, because to be a Pharisee you
had to be a man men whose hearts had grown hard.
He also accused them of causing a divorce wife to
commit adultery if she remarried, and they then being subject
to that sin. As well. Upholding God's design for marriage.
He did that love is the fulfillment of the law.
He did that Matthew twenty two, verses thirty three for forty.
When a pharisee asked about the greatest commandment, Jesus summarized
the law with Deuterotomy sixty five love for God and
the Vitigus nineteen, verse eighteen love for the neighbors, stating
on these two commandments depend all the law and the prophets.
The pharisees focus and detailed regulations often obscured this foundational
principle correction. Jesus taught that love is the lens through
which all laws should be interpreted, exposing the pharisees tendency
to prioritize rules over relationships. Then it goes on his
hypocrisy and the law's application, and then we get to
something of an extension where Jesus actually made the law harder.
You've heard it said you shall not commit adultery, But
I tell you, a man who looks at a woman
with lust in his heart has already committed adultery with her.
He took the sin, the physical sin of adultery, and
he expanded it to a mental sin. Now he spoke
of adultery, you can expand that easily a nough to
any sexual sin, such as fornication or same sex activity.
The same Bible that prohibited many of these things and
talked about many of these things, Jesus quoted the same
old Testaments Jesus was quoting also said that same sex
activity is a sin. Jesus had all sorts of time,
being God part of the train, and God had forever
to plant out his speech when he came down here
to say, you've heard it said that a man shall
not lie with a man as with a woman, nor
a woman with another woman as with a man. But
I tell you it's cool. Love is love. Jesus never
did that, and he wasn't shy about correcting the pharisees.
We would be wise to remember that Jesus Christ never
spoke accidentally. Everything he said was intentional, and every warning
he issued was based upon love. Our love for God
with our entire heart mind soul and strength, and his
love for us, a love so great that he came
down to earth, took on the form of a vulnerable
little baby, knew human suffering and human temptation, and knew
a death to which few of us can ever relate. Fact,
none of us can relate to the Cross. That's how
much he loved us. This is the Todd Hermannshaw. Please go,
be well, be strong, be kind, and please make every
effort to walk in the life of Christ.