WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>H So where do we get the Bible from? Did

2
00:00:34.359 --> 00:00:36.039
<v Speaker 1>you even read the cannons?

3
00:00:37.479 --> 00:00:40.520
<v Speaker 2>There is only one charge. You are in occult.

4
00:00:40.840 --> 00:00:44.719
<v Speaker 1>You're a gobbling the demon, a bull merchard you saw me.

5
00:00:45.479 --> 00:00:46.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm your dude.

6
00:00:47.479 --> 00:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Is this your person of the webs? I attended?

7
00:00:52.679 --> 00:00:54.280
<v Speaker 3>You can't take it?

8
00:00:54.759 --> 00:01:00.759
<v Speaker 4>So to your boys on your dude, plus one plus

9
00:01:00.759 --> 00:01:01.600
<v Speaker 4>one equal free.

10
00:01:03.280 --> 00:01:04.760
<v Speaker 2>It comes out the doll the tree.

11
00:01:06.599 --> 00:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Why do you pray eat the dead people?

12
00:01:09.359 --> 00:01:12.079
<v Speaker 2>That's the traditions A man new heretic.

13
00:01:12.599 --> 00:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Wow, wow, mr dude, is this your person.

14
00:01:22.359 --> 00:01:23.400
<v Speaker 5>On a web?

15
00:01:24.200 --> 00:01:24.319
<v Speaker 6>Cha?

16
00:01:25.480 --> 00:01:28.079
<v Speaker 7>I need a I can't take it.

17
00:01:28.400 --> 00:01:28.879
<v Speaker 2>He's little.

18
00:01:28.879 --> 00:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>To your boys, I'm your dude, andiic.

19
00:01:35.200 --> 00:01:39.079
<v Speaker 7>Justification with you.

20
00:02:18.439 --> 00:02:22.280
<v Speaker 5>I remember when Lofton was engaged in pushing all of

21
00:02:22.319 --> 00:02:25.439
<v Speaker 5>these stories and especially the idea that there's going to

22
00:02:25.479 --> 00:02:30.120
<v Speaker 5>be thousands and thousands of Roman Orthodox coming into the

23
00:02:30.159 --> 00:02:32.800
<v Speaker 5>Roman Catholic Church in the near future. Well none of

24
00:02:32.800 --> 00:02:38.400
<v Speaker 5>that happened, and rather the opposite happened. We've seen mass

25
00:02:38.439 --> 00:02:42.919
<v Speaker 5>conversions out of Protestantism and out of Orthodox, out of

26
00:02:43.039 --> 00:02:48.159
<v Speaker 5>Rome into Orthodoxy, and they are in kind of a

27
00:02:48.280 --> 00:02:52.319
<v Speaker 5>delusion phase of acting like in gaslighting, that nobody's converted.

28
00:02:52.599 --> 00:02:56.360
<v Speaker 5>This doesn't exist. It's made up. I remember William Albrecht

29
00:02:56.400 --> 00:02:59.479
<v Speaker 5>said that there was no Orthodox discord. I didn't have it.

30
00:02:59.479 --> 00:03:02.120
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't have have twelve thousand people in it. At

31
00:03:02.159 --> 00:03:04.120
<v Speaker 5>the time it was five thousand. It was all made up,

32
00:03:04.159 --> 00:03:10.800
<v Speaker 5>doesn't exist. We saw Ibarra not do very well against

33
00:03:10.919 --> 00:03:14.400
<v Speaker 5>Ubi and his debate. In fact, on the very issues

34
00:03:14.439 --> 00:03:17.879
<v Speaker 5>of the debate, he admitted, I don't have a sufficient

35
00:03:18.039 --> 00:03:20.960
<v Speaker 5>answer for that question, and I ain't got one yet,

36
00:03:21.120 --> 00:03:24.520
<v Speaker 5>didn't I have to get back to your own which

37
00:03:24.560 --> 00:03:27.159
<v Speaker 5>was one of the topics of the debate, the papacy

38
00:03:27.199 --> 00:03:33.599
<v Speaker 5>of Virgilius. So now we have a person claiming on

39
00:03:33.639 --> 00:03:39.680
<v Speaker 5>Twitter who you got it won't come debate, that he

40
00:03:39.800 --> 00:03:43.159
<v Speaker 5>no longer is Orthodox, he's converted to Rome. And then

41
00:03:43.159 --> 00:03:45.919
<v Speaker 5>it turns out when people started asking him, were you

42
00:03:45.919 --> 00:03:50.439
<v Speaker 5>actually Orthodox, he never replies, and eventually it says I

43
00:03:50.479 --> 00:03:53.719
<v Speaker 5>never said I was your brother in Orthodoxy. I said

44
00:03:53.759 --> 00:03:57.400
<v Speaker 5>I was your brother in Christ. It's very pious of him,

45
00:03:57.680 --> 00:04:01.360
<v Speaker 5>but in actuality that's an admission that no, he never

46
00:04:01.520 --> 00:04:07.639
<v Speaker 5>was Orthodox. But the tweet that is going viral ish

47
00:04:08.400 --> 00:04:13.719
<v Speaker 5>many viral, two hundred thousand views. I no longer believe Orthodoxy,

48
00:04:14.280 --> 00:04:17.920
<v Speaker 5>but you weren't Orthodox, you were an e inquir investigator.

49
00:04:18.759 --> 00:04:22.040
<v Speaker 5>You didn't actually, as far as we can tell, become

50
00:04:22.079 --> 00:04:27.279
<v Speaker 5>a cdech human. You weren't received into the church. And

51
00:04:27.360 --> 00:04:31.279
<v Speaker 5>yet he puts up a post, just some random, probably

52
00:04:31.360 --> 00:04:34.079
<v Speaker 5>twenty year old guy. Maybe he's what does he say

53
00:04:34.120 --> 00:04:38.879
<v Speaker 5>he is? Zoomer? Oh, I was a Lutheran and I

54
00:04:38.959 --> 00:04:42.399
<v Speaker 5>listened to Luigi a little bit and now decide I'm

55
00:04:42.439 --> 00:04:46.800
<v Speaker 5>going to Rome. And then of course there was no

56
00:04:46.879 --> 00:04:49.160
<v Speaker 5>evidence that he was ever Orthodox, and then he admits

57
00:04:49.160 --> 00:04:51.000
<v Speaker 5>that he wasn't. And the Roman Catholics is saying, he

58
00:04:51.040 --> 00:04:54.120
<v Speaker 5>doesn't owe anything to you. He doesn't owe anything to you,

59
00:04:54.560 --> 00:04:57.160
<v Speaker 5>has nothing. It's nothing to do with owing, has nothing

60
00:04:57.160 --> 00:04:59.120
<v Speaker 5>to do with the debt, has to do with whether

61
00:04:59.199 --> 00:05:01.279
<v Speaker 5>or not you're telling the true truth or not. And no,

62
00:05:01.360 --> 00:05:06.120
<v Speaker 5>you can't just it's just dishonest. But it's weird. I

63
00:05:06.120 --> 00:05:09.199
<v Speaker 5>think in the gen Z like they don't care about

64
00:05:09.360 --> 00:05:11.720
<v Speaker 5>this kind of stuff, like it's okay to just be dishonest,

65
00:05:11.759 --> 00:05:15.279
<v Speaker 5>which is weird because they're hyper moral to but they

66
00:05:15.279 --> 00:05:19.399
<v Speaker 5>don't really see any problem with pretending and presenting yourself

67
00:05:19.439 --> 00:05:23.399
<v Speaker 5>as something that you're not. Many of them, for example,

68
00:05:23.399 --> 00:05:27.319
<v Speaker 5>will claim that they are translators, that they're linguistic translators,

69
00:05:27.399 --> 00:05:32.439
<v Speaker 5>no degree, no qualifications, They're using AI and they think

70
00:05:32.480 --> 00:05:36.560
<v Speaker 5>that makes them a translator. They think that they are

71
00:05:36.800 --> 00:05:41.000
<v Speaker 5>educated on topics because they watched YouTube videos and many

72
00:05:41.040 --> 00:05:43.639
<v Speaker 5>of them don't even read books. So it's just a

73
00:05:43.680 --> 00:05:47.920
<v Speaker 5>really weird era to be in when people have really

74
00:05:47.959 --> 00:05:54.680
<v Speaker 5>no problem with a form of con artistry. Really, if

75
00:05:54.720 --> 00:05:57.959
<v Speaker 5>you don't have qualifications, if you're not studying a subject,

76
00:05:58.360 --> 00:06:03.279
<v Speaker 5>you don't front like you are on the internet. But unfortunately,

77
00:06:03.279 --> 00:06:04.879
<v Speaker 5>one of the downsides of the Internet is that it

78
00:06:04.920 --> 00:06:10.800
<v Speaker 5>gives everybody the ability to put up a persona that

79
00:06:10.879 --> 00:06:15.040
<v Speaker 5>they have qualifications and that they know what they're talking about.

80
00:06:15.160 --> 00:06:19.800
<v Speaker 5>And I mean, thank you. That's just I guess, part

81
00:06:19.800 --> 00:06:22.639
<v Speaker 5>of the downside of the world of the internet. But

82
00:06:24.079 --> 00:06:29.680
<v Speaker 5>here we are, so they're all saying, oh. And then

83
00:06:29.759 --> 00:06:33.800
<v Speaker 5>the other thing that was funny was that he said, oh,

84
00:06:33.839 --> 00:06:36.839
<v Speaker 5>I never actually listened to any of your content, Jay exactly.

85
00:06:40.839 --> 00:06:43.879
<v Speaker 5>And then he says, you say dumb things. Well, I'd

86
00:06:43.920 --> 00:06:47.399
<v Speaker 5>like for him to come defend his position, but he says, no,

87
00:06:47.480 --> 00:06:53.199
<v Speaker 5>I won't debate. So this is the standard sort of

88
00:06:54.279 --> 00:06:59.879
<v Speaker 5>just cowardice from people that don't have any actual arguments.

89
00:07:00.480 --> 00:07:02.519
<v Speaker 5>I bet he was happy to virtue signal though that

90
00:07:02.560 --> 00:07:05.759
<v Speaker 5>he wasn't a member of my audience. He actually says,

91
00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:08.600
<v Speaker 5>I actually avoided your content. I watched it sometimes, but

92
00:07:08.680 --> 00:07:12.240
<v Speaker 5>you said dumb stuff. What's the dumb stuff. I'd love

93
00:07:12.279 --> 00:07:14.800
<v Speaker 5>to hear what you think was dumb. I love to

94
00:07:14.800 --> 00:07:16.759
<v Speaker 5>hear a good argument from you as to why we

95
00:07:16.800 --> 00:07:20.040
<v Speaker 5>should be Roman Catholic, especially given the craziness of Francis.

96
00:07:20.920 --> 00:07:23.800
<v Speaker 5>But given that he basically lied and admits that he

97
00:07:23.879 --> 00:07:27.560
<v Speaker 5>lied and says that, well, I wasn't really ever orthodox,

98
00:07:28.920 --> 00:07:35.839
<v Speaker 5>but I'm no longer orthodox. Should we be surprised at

99
00:07:35.879 --> 00:07:40.600
<v Speaker 5>any of this? I don't guess we should. It's just

100
00:07:40.639 --> 00:07:42.759
<v Speaker 5>really I don't know. It reinforces that. I mean, he'll

101
00:07:42.759 --> 00:07:45.439
<v Speaker 5>do well in Rome. He'll he'll go far in Rome

102
00:07:46.199 --> 00:07:50.600
<v Speaker 5>with this early track record of deception and lying, and

103
00:07:51.000 --> 00:07:54.240
<v Speaker 5>maybe he'll find home with his Skittles friends. I'm sure

104
00:07:54.240 --> 00:07:57.480
<v Speaker 5>he has a lot of Skittles friends. That is probably

105
00:07:57.519 --> 00:08:01.360
<v Speaker 5>that's people will always overlook, like their motivations for why

106
00:08:01.439 --> 00:08:06.879
<v Speaker 5>people turn to something like Rome. I mean, sometimes people

107
00:08:06.920 --> 00:08:10.240
<v Speaker 5>are genuinely looking into the intellectual issues, but in a

108
00:08:10.240 --> 00:08:12.360
<v Speaker 5>lot of cases it may just be because they have

109
00:08:12.399 --> 00:08:14.959
<v Speaker 5>a boyfriend, you know, maybe he has a boyfriend in Rome.

110
00:08:14.959 --> 00:08:18.439
<v Speaker 5>Maybe he has a girlfriend in Rome, And those kind

111
00:08:18.439 --> 00:08:26.439
<v Speaker 5>of motivations are far more overlooked than the kind of

112
00:08:26.480 --> 00:08:30.000
<v Speaker 5>identifiers and indicators that we're talking about in the intellectual realm.

113
00:08:30.199 --> 00:08:32.320
<v Speaker 5>And a lot of times the intellectual things are just

114
00:08:32.360 --> 00:08:38.960
<v Speaker 5>sort of excuses that people make because really it's something else, right, girlfriend, boyfriend,

115
00:08:41.360 --> 00:08:47.720
<v Speaker 5>homo erotic tryst, whatever fits the Roman system more appropriately.

116
00:08:49.519 --> 00:08:51.960
<v Speaker 5>So we're going to open it up today. Originally I

117
00:08:52.000 --> 00:08:56.919
<v Speaker 5>put Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, but I don't think anybody. I mean,

118
00:08:57.000 --> 00:09:00.879
<v Speaker 5>last night it was the most pitiful show of Muslims

119
00:09:00.879 --> 00:09:05.919
<v Speaker 5>I've ever seen. I mean, I couldn't believe that with me, God,

120
00:09:06.080 --> 00:09:13.639
<v Speaker 5>Logic and Sam Shamun we had that low tier. I mean,

121
00:09:13.679 --> 00:09:17.840
<v Speaker 5>it was just wild. I've kind of felt sorry for

122
00:09:17.919 --> 00:09:22.759
<v Speaker 5>the guys calling in last night because some of them

123
00:09:22.799 --> 00:09:27.080
<v Speaker 5>seem like just normal dudes. But just like with Rome

124
00:09:28.279 --> 00:09:32.600
<v Speaker 5>and just like with Islam, it really seems like people

125
00:09:32.600 --> 00:09:38.799
<v Speaker 5>are there's something just about these religions that appeal. I mean,

126
00:09:38.840 --> 00:09:41.960
<v Speaker 5>they do both have some intellectual people, but there's something

127
00:09:42.000 --> 00:09:46.519
<v Speaker 5>about these two religions that appeal to not very smart people.

128
00:09:47.039 --> 00:09:50.080
<v Speaker 5>And I fully understand that it's not all about intellect.

129
00:09:50.159 --> 00:09:53.960
<v Speaker 5>It's ultimately about you know, do we humble ourselves and

130
00:09:54.000 --> 00:09:59.039
<v Speaker 5>submit ourselves to truth first and set aside our intellect

131
00:09:59.080 --> 00:10:00.960
<v Speaker 5>and not let our intellect get in the way. I

132
00:10:01.200 --> 00:10:04.960
<v Speaker 5>totally understand all that. But at the same time, it's

133
00:10:05.000 --> 00:10:08.080
<v Speaker 5>like there is an element of intellect that is involved

134
00:10:08.080 --> 00:10:11.799
<v Speaker 5>in this. And with all those guys that called in

135
00:10:11.840 --> 00:10:15.519
<v Speaker 5>who were former quote Catholics who become Muslims. Isn't that

136
00:10:15.519 --> 00:10:19.360
<v Speaker 5>interesting last night if you watch that long strain that

137
00:10:19.399 --> 00:10:25.200
<v Speaker 5>we did. One of the commonalities that I see amongst

138
00:10:25.200 --> 00:10:29.480
<v Speaker 5>the people who say leave Rome orly Orthodoxy and become

139
00:10:29.559 --> 00:10:36.120
<v Speaker 5>Roman Catholic, or who leave Catholicism and become Muslim is

140
00:10:36.320 --> 00:10:40.559
<v Speaker 5>they leave and become those things for really bad reasons,

141
00:10:41.480 --> 00:10:45.080
<v Speaker 5>and they might appear to that person to be good reasons.

142
00:10:46.399 --> 00:10:49.159
<v Speaker 5>And this is where logic and fallacies are so important.

143
00:10:50.039 --> 00:10:54.559
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you can literally f up your life by

144
00:10:54.639 --> 00:10:58.519
<v Speaker 5>not knowing basic fallacies. And there's some balance that we

145
00:10:58.559 --> 00:11:00.879
<v Speaker 5>have to strike here because I'm not saying it's all intellect,

146
00:11:00.960 --> 00:11:05.279
<v Speaker 5>obviously it's not. But there is an element of critical

147
00:11:05.279 --> 00:11:08.399
<v Speaker 5>thinking and reasoning that you have to engage in or

148
00:11:08.399 --> 00:11:11.679
<v Speaker 5>you're gonna get duped. You're gonna believe just stupid stuff

149
00:11:11.879 --> 00:11:18.000
<v Speaker 5>for stupid reasons that you think are good reasons. Let

150
00:11:18.039 --> 00:11:21.000
<v Speaker 5>me think of an example of you know, some of

151
00:11:21.039 --> 00:11:24.759
<v Speaker 5>the common things that we hear between say a Roman

152
00:11:24.799 --> 00:11:30.080
<v Speaker 5>Catholic or a sam Mormon, is how they feel when

153
00:11:30.080 --> 00:11:35.039
<v Speaker 5>they prayed this or that Marian prayer. Identical argument that

154
00:11:35.080 --> 00:11:38.080
<v Speaker 5>the Mormon makes when they talk about the whatever the

155
00:11:38.120 --> 00:11:42.480
<v Speaker 5>Mormon version of burning in the bosom prayer the Mormon,

156
00:11:43.759 --> 00:11:48.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, alter call whatever it is. They'll literally say

157
00:11:48.720 --> 00:11:52.200
<v Speaker 5>something like, well, when I prayed the Rosary, I just

158
00:11:52.240 --> 00:11:56.480
<v Speaker 5>had this overwhelming feeling of peace. I just had this

159
00:11:56.720 --> 00:11:59.120
<v Speaker 5>I felt like Mary was speaking to me. I've literally

160
00:11:59.159 --> 00:12:02.679
<v Speaker 5>heard multiple people, well guys and girls, say this is

161
00:12:02.720 --> 00:12:07.480
<v Speaker 5>what convinced them of Catholicism over Orthodoxy. And I'm like,

162
00:12:08.799 --> 00:12:11.039
<v Speaker 5>what would you say to a Mormon who says the

163
00:12:11.120 --> 00:12:14.240
<v Speaker 5>exact same thing When I prayed the Mormon prayer and

164
00:12:14.279 --> 00:12:19.679
<v Speaker 5>I felt the burning in my bosom?

165
00:12:19.960 --> 00:12:23.679
<v Speaker 8>What can't hear you?

166
00:12:26.600 --> 00:12:30.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, Jamie's saying, maybe they're being given drugs. Well, it

167
00:12:30.399 --> 00:12:32.039
<v Speaker 5>might have been drugs back in the days of what

168
00:12:32.080 --> 00:12:34.600
<v Speaker 5>maybe Joseph Smith figured out, you know, some kind of

169
00:12:34.639 --> 00:12:36.360
<v Speaker 5>drug that he gave people that made him feel good

170
00:12:36.440 --> 00:12:39.799
<v Speaker 5>or something. But this is a very common experience that

171
00:12:39.840 --> 00:12:44.519
<v Speaker 5>Mormon missionaries have with people that they're trying to recruit

172
00:12:44.559 --> 00:12:46.919
<v Speaker 5>in the mission field. Right, Mormon missionaries go out, they'll

173
00:12:46.960 --> 00:12:50.080
<v Speaker 5>go door to door, and when they find a perspective convert,

174
00:12:50.159 --> 00:12:54.080
<v Speaker 5>they will do the whole you know, prayer, burning in

175
00:12:54.080 --> 00:12:57.559
<v Speaker 5>the bosom thing. And then if you feel something, which

176
00:12:57.759 --> 00:13:01.919
<v Speaker 5>could be anything, right, could be uh, your emotions on

177
00:13:01.960 --> 00:13:05.600
<v Speaker 5>the on the on the spot. It could be pizza

178
00:13:05.639 --> 00:13:08.279
<v Speaker 5>that you ate last night, you know, giving you bubble guts.

179
00:13:08.320 --> 00:13:13.120
<v Speaker 5>It could be a demon, you know, making you feel

180
00:13:13.200 --> 00:13:16.200
<v Speaker 5>some some kind of way. It could be all kinds

181
00:13:16.240 --> 00:13:20.519
<v Speaker 5>of things causing a feeling. And so that's why we

182
00:13:20.559 --> 00:13:24.159
<v Speaker 5>cannot make our religious decisions, our life decisions on the

183
00:13:24.159 --> 00:13:27.360
<v Speaker 5>basis of feelings. I mean, it could be all kinds

184
00:13:27.360 --> 00:13:32.039
<v Speaker 5>of things. It's the same as like and even sometimes

185
00:13:32.080 --> 00:13:35.879
<v Speaker 5>we can have a correct belief that we have bad

186
00:13:35.960 --> 00:13:42.240
<v Speaker 5>reasons for. We always use example, you know, oh, why

187
00:13:42.240 --> 00:13:44.679
<v Speaker 5>do you own bitcoin? A whole bitcoin? Oh well, I

188
00:13:44.799 --> 00:13:47.320
<v Speaker 5>listened to my dreams. Bill Cosby came to me in

189
00:13:47.360 --> 00:13:50.440
<v Speaker 5>a dream and he said, by the big coins and

190
00:13:50.480 --> 00:13:54.399
<v Speaker 5>they went up. So therefore I can trust my dreams

191
00:13:54.440 --> 00:13:56.440
<v Speaker 5>and I can listen to the spirit of Bill Cosby,

192
00:13:56.440 --> 00:13:58.759
<v Speaker 5>and my dreams tell me to buy bitcoin and see

193
00:13:58.759 --> 00:14:02.720
<v Speaker 5>bitcoin went up. So let's proof, Well, that bitcoin went

194
00:14:02.840 --> 00:14:09.200
<v Speaker 5>up does not necessarily connect to your Bill Cosby bitcoin dream.

195
00:14:09.720 --> 00:14:12.360
<v Speaker 5>So that would be a bad reason for believing in

196
00:14:12.399 --> 00:14:15.039
<v Speaker 5>something that turned out to be true, that bitcoin would

197
00:14:15.039 --> 00:14:18.720
<v Speaker 5>go up over time. Right, So you don't just need

198
00:14:19.200 --> 00:14:23.120
<v Speaker 5>reasons that happened to be correlated with something true that happened,

199
00:14:24.519 --> 00:14:28.879
<v Speaker 5>or you actually need good reasons, not just any old reasons.

200
00:14:29.399 --> 00:14:32.200
<v Speaker 5>And I don't think this. I think this guy listed

201
00:14:32.240 --> 00:14:36.720
<v Speaker 5>a few of his reasons, and shocker, he wasn't familiar

202
00:14:36.759 --> 00:14:40.159
<v Speaker 5>with any of the argumentation that we do. I mean, already,

203
00:14:40.240 --> 00:14:45.120
<v Speaker 5>this whole profile just screams like annoying virtue signaler. Anybody

204
00:14:45.159 --> 00:14:47.879
<v Speaker 5>who puts the picture of Jesus as their profile picture

205
00:14:48.879 --> 00:14:51.320
<v Speaker 5>and all this religious imagery as their proof, as the

206
00:14:51.519 --> 00:14:56.360
<v Speaker 5>icons as their profile, they're almost always insufferable virtue signalers.

207
00:14:57.159 --> 00:15:00.360
<v Speaker 5>It's just a kind of a weird delusion. And so

208
00:15:00.399 --> 00:15:03.000
<v Speaker 5>he's Jay's talking about me on the stream right now,

209
00:15:03.000 --> 00:15:05.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm getting spammed by diary he's freaking out right now

210
00:15:05.320 --> 00:15:07.279
<v Speaker 5>because I'm actually talking about him. Only of reason I'm

211
00:15:07.320 --> 00:15:11.759
<v Speaker 5>talking about your case is because it's a pattern example

212
00:15:11.840 --> 00:15:15.720
<v Speaker 5>of the few instances that we've seen where people accept

213
00:15:15.799 --> 00:15:20.159
<v Speaker 5>Rome and I'm trying to find your bad loft and level.

214
00:15:20.279 --> 00:15:23.000
<v Speaker 5>They're literally loft in level reasonings I'm trying to find out.

215
00:15:23.000 --> 00:15:27.960
<v Speaker 5>I thought he had a post that explained there are

216
00:15:27.960 --> 00:15:32.120
<v Speaker 5>many reasons why, but I will always be your brother

217
00:15:32.200 --> 00:15:34.240
<v Speaker 5>in Christ. It doesn't work like that, Like you don't

218
00:15:34.320 --> 00:15:38.000
<v Speaker 5>get to be an acumenist. I guess in Rome you

219
00:15:38.200 --> 00:15:40.799
<v Speaker 5>to being a cumenist, but that doesn't mean that it's

220
00:15:40.840 --> 00:15:44.240
<v Speaker 5>consistent anyway. I don't even see his reasons for why

221
00:15:44.279 --> 00:15:46.960
<v Speaker 5>he became Caligi over Orthodox. People are saying in the

222
00:15:47.039 --> 00:15:50.639
<v Speaker 5>chat that elsewhere he explains that his reasons are just

223
00:15:50.720 --> 00:15:53.519
<v Speaker 5>kind of like basic Michael Lofton level kind of stuff.

224
00:15:53.879 --> 00:15:55.519
<v Speaker 5>And you'll notice in you know, in the Ubie debate,

225
00:15:56.600 --> 00:16:01.240
<v Speaker 5>the debate over the papal stuff gets nuanced and really

226
00:16:01.279 --> 00:16:05.519
<v Speaker 5>deep and really historical, and it's unfortunate that it is

227
00:16:05.519 --> 00:16:07.759
<v Speaker 5>that way. I wish it wasn't a situation where there

228
00:16:07.799 --> 00:16:11.440
<v Speaker 5>was you know, reading that was necessary and whatnot. But

229
00:16:11.480 --> 00:16:13.559
<v Speaker 5>really the only reason that all that reading is necessary

230
00:16:13.600 --> 00:16:16.360
<v Speaker 5>is that people don't pay attention to the obvious. And

231
00:16:16.399 --> 00:16:18.320
<v Speaker 5>when I say the obvious, I mean if you had

232
00:16:18.320 --> 00:16:20.720
<v Speaker 5>a basic introduction to the history of the Church in

233
00:16:20.759 --> 00:16:24.279
<v Speaker 5>the first thousand years, say from Pelicon, or even from

234
00:16:24.320 --> 00:16:27.759
<v Speaker 5>a Roman Catholic like de Vornik, you would note that

235
00:16:28.679 --> 00:16:33.919
<v Speaker 5>sentidality collegiality is pretty much universally admitted. Rome admits this.

236
00:16:34.039 --> 00:16:36.840
<v Speaker 5>Now the idea that the Church was governed in this

237
00:16:37.480 --> 00:16:40.360
<v Speaker 5>Vatican one paper way is just no longer believed and

238
00:16:40.399 --> 00:16:45.360
<v Speaker 5>admitted to be true by the Vatican itself. So it

239
00:16:45.399 --> 00:16:48.399
<v Speaker 5>says we now have the Vatican admitting that this was

240
00:16:48.440 --> 00:16:51.960
<v Speaker 5>an evolution in the Chiad and Alexandria documents. You would

241
00:16:51.960 --> 00:16:54.120
<v Speaker 5>think that it would just kind of be obvious, And

242
00:16:54.159 --> 00:16:56.840
<v Speaker 5>then you would think it would be obvious that when

243
00:16:56.879 --> 00:17:01.039
<v Speaker 5>people see the insanity of what the the papacy does

244
00:17:01.080 --> 00:17:04.720
<v Speaker 5>on almost a daily basis of post Vatican two, you

245
00:17:04.759 --> 00:17:07.440
<v Speaker 5>would think they have discernment. But they don't. And the

246
00:17:07.480 --> 00:17:11.440
<v Speaker 5>reason that we don't have discernment is because we are

247
00:17:12.200 --> 00:17:14.720
<v Speaker 5>not number one close to God, because we would have

248
00:17:14.799 --> 00:17:16.880
<v Speaker 5>discernment were we close to God, we would be able

249
00:17:16.920 --> 00:17:19.759
<v Speaker 5>to see the true and the false. We would be

250
00:17:19.880 --> 00:17:22.000
<v Speaker 5>praying and asking for the gift of discernment, which is

251
00:17:22.039 --> 00:17:23.559
<v Speaker 5>one of the gifts of the spirit. According to Paul,

252
00:17:24.519 --> 00:17:26.960
<v Speaker 5>we would be able to tell the truth from the false.

253
00:17:27.920 --> 00:17:32.440
<v Speaker 5>We'd be able to discern the spirits. As John says

254
00:17:32.440 --> 00:17:36.039
<v Speaker 5>in his letters, and as Paul talks about right just

255
00:17:36.240 --> 00:17:39.319
<v Speaker 5>understanding and knowing the truth from the false spirits. John says,

256
00:17:39.359 --> 00:17:42.039
<v Speaker 5>you have an anointing, and therefore you will know the

257
00:17:42.079 --> 00:17:46.880
<v Speaker 5>true and the false. Well, people that are being duped

258
00:17:46.920 --> 00:17:49.200
<v Speaker 5>by this stuff, that tells me that they don't have

259
00:17:49.279 --> 00:17:53.279
<v Speaker 5>the anointing and they're lacking that gift of discernment. And

260
00:17:53.319 --> 00:17:55.240
<v Speaker 5>I can also say from experience that I've made a

261
00:17:55.240 --> 00:17:57.039
<v Speaker 5>lot of these same mistakes. So I'm not trying to

262
00:17:57.039 --> 00:18:01.559
<v Speaker 5>be mean or rude to people that are making them

263
00:18:01.799 --> 00:18:03.599
<v Speaker 5>the same mistakes I did. But you'll notice that these

264
00:18:03.640 --> 00:18:07.160
<v Speaker 5>people are not interested in hearing or listening to anyone else.

265
00:18:07.960 --> 00:18:10.759
<v Speaker 5>It's odd to me that people who make this decision,

266
00:18:10.960 --> 00:18:13.359
<v Speaker 5>and by the way, it's not common. It's actually pretty rare,

267
00:18:13.960 --> 00:18:17.079
<v Speaker 5>I would say, And you know this because the Rumancalics

268
00:18:17.119 --> 00:18:20.200
<v Speaker 5>will trumpet this all over the place. Right, They didn't

269
00:18:20.200 --> 00:18:23.279
<v Speaker 5>even bother to look into whether this guy actually was Orthodox.

270
00:18:23.279 --> 00:18:26.200
<v Speaker 5>As soon as somebody says on the internet, like the

271
00:18:26.319 --> 00:18:30.400
<v Speaker 5>sock puppets of you Know twenty eighteen claiming that Lofton

272
00:18:30.480 --> 00:18:34.119
<v Speaker 5>was mass converting people to roam from Orthodoxy, nobody actually

273
00:18:34.200 --> 00:18:37.039
<v Speaker 5>checks into these They just run with the claims. Then

274
00:18:37.079 --> 00:18:39.920
<v Speaker 5>when you when you actually dig into it, well, he

275
00:18:39.960 --> 00:18:43.400
<v Speaker 5>wasn't actually Orthodox, he was just e inquiring. Yeah, but

276
00:18:43.400 --> 00:18:46.039
<v Speaker 5>that doesn't mean you're Orthodox with you if you e inquire.

277
00:18:47.319 --> 00:18:49.720
<v Speaker 5>But everybody's under this delusion that you can kind of

278
00:18:49.759 --> 00:18:52.240
<v Speaker 5>just make yourself be whatever you want on the internet

279
00:18:52.240 --> 00:18:54.559
<v Speaker 5>and then everybody should just accept it. All the Roman

280
00:18:54.599 --> 00:18:56.599
<v Speaker 5>Catholics in the comments that are replying to me on

281
00:18:56.640 --> 00:18:59.799
<v Speaker 5>his posts, he doesn't owe you anything. He doesn't have

282
00:18:59.839 --> 00:19:03.119
<v Speaker 5>to defend himself to you. He just owe you. There's

283
00:19:03.160 --> 00:19:05.920
<v Speaker 5>nothing to do with own with whether or not you're

284
00:19:05.920 --> 00:19:12.559
<v Speaker 5>telling the truth or not. And if I was genuinely

285
00:19:13.359 --> 00:19:17.319
<v Speaker 5>unclear on this topic, wouldn't you want to go to

286
00:19:17.359 --> 00:19:21.039
<v Speaker 5>the people who are known to be the top defenders

287
00:19:21.119 --> 00:19:25.519
<v Speaker 5>or debaters on that subject. And so, in other words,

288
00:19:25.519 --> 00:19:28.519
<v Speaker 5>they're making choices not based on like who actually has

289
00:19:28.559 --> 00:19:32.839
<v Speaker 5>good arguments, who actually has the best apologetic defense and critique.

290
00:19:33.640 --> 00:19:36.279
<v Speaker 5>You know, he says in his comments, I don't listen

291
00:19:36.319 --> 00:19:37.880
<v Speaker 5>to your stuff. I don't really care about you say

292
00:19:37.920 --> 00:19:41.559
<v Speaker 5>dumb stuff like no examples of it, just some kind

293
00:19:41.599 --> 00:19:46.599
<v Speaker 5>of lame, low tier jab But no, but they don't

294
00:19:46.640 --> 00:19:49.319
<v Speaker 5>actually go to the people literally known for being like

295
00:19:49.480 --> 00:19:52.720
<v Speaker 5>the top debaters. Even if you disagreed, wouldn't you want

296
00:19:52.799 --> 00:19:55.640
<v Speaker 5>to know what the top debaters in this or that

297
00:19:55.680 --> 00:20:00.319
<v Speaker 5>field say? And he said, well, I listened to elite

298
00:20:00.400 --> 00:20:03.640
<v Speaker 5>Luigi for a few months. Now. I'm not dissing Luigi.

299
00:20:03.720 --> 00:20:08.079
<v Speaker 5>Luigi's a great debater, but I mean, Luigi is not

300
00:20:08.160 --> 00:20:11.359
<v Speaker 5>familiar with all the pre Vatican two post Vatican two

301
00:20:11.599 --> 00:20:14.960
<v Speaker 5>dogmatic contradiction material. Maybe he will be eventually. I'm not sure.

302
00:20:14.960 --> 00:20:17.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm not dissing Luigi at all. But you know, Luigi's

303
00:20:17.440 --> 00:20:19.599
<v Speaker 5>done really well in his two debates. But luigis is

304
00:20:19.599 --> 00:20:24.119
<v Speaker 5>also a fairly new convert. Why would you hang everything

305
00:20:24.240 --> 00:20:30.920
<v Speaker 5>supposedly on Luigi? And now, oh, he's only fourteen years old.

306
00:20:31.480 --> 00:20:34.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't know people's age. People are publicly saying all

307
00:20:34.279 --> 00:20:38.440
<v Speaker 5>kinds of stuff, and the whole Roman Catholic world is

308
00:20:38.640 --> 00:20:40.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, two hundred thousand people now are looking at

309
00:20:40.880 --> 00:20:44.440
<v Speaker 5>this tweet as if this is some sort of like

310
00:20:45.440 --> 00:20:48.960
<v Speaker 5>we gotcha, we could have finally owned the Ortho bros.

311
00:20:49.000 --> 00:20:52.119
<v Speaker 5>Like this is some giant win for all the Roman

312
00:20:52.160 --> 00:20:54.400
<v Speaker 5>Catholic world, even if he is a fourteen or fifty

313
00:20:54.440 --> 00:20:58.039
<v Speaker 5>year old dude. That's even worse for the Roman Catholics

314
00:20:58.079 --> 00:21:02.519
<v Speaker 5>for touting some fourteen year old guy who doesn't know

315
00:21:02.559 --> 00:21:07.119
<v Speaker 5>the arguments, who hasn't studied this stuff, as if that's

316
00:21:07.200 --> 00:21:10.000
<v Speaker 5>like a win against the Orthodox. This is all so ridiculous,

317
00:21:10.039 --> 00:21:13.559
<v Speaker 5>like everything about all of this stuff online, with all

318
00:21:13.599 --> 00:21:16.960
<v Speaker 5>of this domain and people who pretend to be like

319
00:21:17.039 --> 00:21:21.319
<v Speaker 5>it's just so ridiculous. I mean, half of the Internet

320
00:21:21.400 --> 00:21:25.000
<v Speaker 5>right now, half a freaking X thinks drones are aliens.

321
00:21:25.039 --> 00:21:29.920
<v Speaker 5>This is how stupid everyone is. There's literally I just

322
00:21:29.960 --> 00:21:32.440
<v Speaker 5>send a message to Tristan like it's literally a drone

323
00:21:32.480 --> 00:21:35.400
<v Speaker 5>that crashed. People are you can see that it's a

324
00:21:35.480 --> 00:21:38.759
<v Speaker 5>drone and like people think that this is aliens. I mean,

325
00:21:40.960 --> 00:21:42.559
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what to say. I mean, people are

326
00:21:42.559 --> 00:21:45.839
<v Speaker 5>just dumb, dude, They're just totally out to lunch. They

327
00:21:45.880 --> 00:21:50.880
<v Speaker 5>don't have any discernment. I mean, did anyone hear the

328
00:21:50.960 --> 00:21:58.240
<v Speaker 5>last night's debate? I mean of the donation sound is

329
00:21:58.440 --> 00:22:01.119
<v Speaker 5>too loud. Let me fix that alert box. It's supposed

330
00:22:01.119 --> 00:22:04.119
<v Speaker 5>to be pretty low, so maybe maybe that's better now.

331
00:22:07.680 --> 00:22:10.279
<v Speaker 5>Half the time this sound resets the on this computer,

332
00:22:10.319 --> 00:22:12.680
<v Speaker 5>and then I never know what's going on with the

333
00:22:12.680 --> 00:22:18.359
<v Speaker 5>sound settings. So yep, of course the input volume is

334
00:22:18.400 --> 00:22:21.200
<v Speaker 5>all the way down in the alert box. Music is

335
00:22:21.240 --> 00:22:23.279
<v Speaker 5>all the way up as usual, so that should be better.

336
00:22:23.319 --> 00:22:24.839
<v Speaker 5>Maybe you can hear me better now. I don't know

337
00:22:24.880 --> 00:22:28.319
<v Speaker 5>why it does that. Just Mac always resets. Oh, I

338
00:22:28.359 --> 00:22:29.920
<v Speaker 5>know why it is if I go on I know

339
00:22:29.920 --> 00:22:32.519
<v Speaker 5>what it is. When I go on streamly Ardyard. Stream

340
00:22:32.559 --> 00:22:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Yard has the auto volume setting, so because God Logic

341
00:22:39.039 --> 00:22:42.240
<v Speaker 5>does everything on stream Yard, whenever I go on those shows,

342
00:22:42.720 --> 00:22:46.920
<v Speaker 5>it resets my internal setting because that's stupid estra. I

343
00:22:46.960 --> 00:22:48.759
<v Speaker 5>hate stream Yard. I don't understand why everybody uses the

344
00:22:48.759 --> 00:22:52.319
<v Speaker 5>stream yards. It's so annoying. But that's why it always

345
00:22:52.359 --> 00:22:54.759
<v Speaker 5>does this. Anytime I go on a stream yard stream

346
00:22:54.839 --> 00:22:57.960
<v Speaker 5>it resets on my audio crap automatically. You can't stop it.

347
00:22:57.960 --> 00:22:59.319
<v Speaker 5>If you try to change it in the midst of

348
00:22:59.359 --> 00:23:02.519
<v Speaker 5>a stream Yard st knocks it back down to like zero.

349
00:23:02.559 --> 00:23:06.559
<v Speaker 5>It's so stupid anyway, and stream Yard tries to make

350
00:23:06.599 --> 00:23:10.200
<v Speaker 5>you sign in from your Facebook. I mean, dude, who

351
00:23:10.240 --> 00:23:12.599
<v Speaker 5>is even using Facebook? What kind of boomer crap is

352
00:23:12.599 --> 00:23:18.359
<v Speaker 5>this stream yard? Nobody uses Facebook? Face boomer maybe sign

353
00:23:18.440 --> 00:23:25.799
<v Speaker 5>in with Facebook? Is that for uncles uncle's roadster stream?

354
00:23:25.920 --> 00:23:29.599
<v Speaker 5>I mean, come on, who what Facebook people are streaming

355
00:23:29.640 --> 00:23:32.799
<v Speaker 5>anyway except your uncle's roadster stream?

356
00:23:34.000 --> 00:23:39.640
<v Speaker 3>D six engine to nerve, I'm a live stream working

357
00:23:39.720 --> 00:23:44.160
<v Speaker 3>on my chopper support Israel and Mud.

358
00:23:46.279 --> 00:23:49.640
<v Speaker 5>Now, somebody sent me three fat super chats here Jen

359
00:23:49.759 --> 00:23:51.480
<v Speaker 5>Lamp fifty dollars, and then we're going to open it

360
00:23:51.559 --> 00:23:54.359
<v Speaker 5>up to debate here in a second. Thank you Enigo

361
00:23:54.400 --> 00:23:57.920
<v Speaker 5>Montoya for your great work. I love you and Jamie's stuff.

362
00:23:58.039 --> 00:24:00.640
<v Speaker 5>God bless you. Thank you, Jen Lamp fifty dollars. Again,

363
00:24:01.039 --> 00:24:03.599
<v Speaker 5>here's another part of this donation, and you go buy

364
00:24:03.640 --> 00:24:07.680
<v Speaker 5>you thank you for everything. But I'm curious what your

365
00:24:07.720 --> 00:24:11.359
<v Speaker 5>thoughts are on the Voynash manuscript. Also, can you do

366
00:24:11.440 --> 00:24:16.119
<v Speaker 5>a weekly Billy Corson check in? Well, Billy cart If

367
00:24:16.119 --> 00:24:18.799
<v Speaker 5>I checked in every week on Billy Corson, he threatened

368
00:24:18.839 --> 00:24:21.359
<v Speaker 5>to sue me. So I'm too scared. Now I gotta

369
00:24:21.720 --> 00:24:24.799
<v Speaker 5>I gotta run. I'm scared. Remember when Lofton threatened assuming

370
00:24:25.039 --> 00:24:27.440
<v Speaker 5>you guys remember the lawsuit, because I said that there

371
00:24:27.519 --> 00:24:29.920
<v Speaker 5>was soccer accounts that are saying that Lofton was the

372
00:24:29.920 --> 00:24:33.079
<v Speaker 5>greatest apologists ever, which literally there was like the soccer

373
00:24:33.079 --> 00:24:36.920
<v Speaker 5>accounts were saying I converted from Orthodoxy to Rome because

374
00:24:36.920 --> 00:24:40.559
<v Speaker 5>of the beautiful, brilliant work of the greatest apologists of

375
00:24:40.599 --> 00:24:42.759
<v Speaker 5>all time, Michael loft It was just so ridiculous and

376
00:24:42.799 --> 00:24:46.960
<v Speaker 5>obviously fake sock accounts that were just created. He's a dog,

377
00:24:47.119 --> 00:24:50.039
<v Speaker 5>you know, a top talking about lawyer by normal Sue.

378
00:24:50.160 --> 00:24:51.680
<v Speaker 5>I got the email where he threatens to assume me.

379
00:24:51.759 --> 00:24:55.880
<v Speaker 5>By the way, Jen lamp here's another donation. Oh, the

380
00:24:55.960 --> 00:24:58.359
<v Speaker 5>Voyage Manuscript. I mean, the only thing I remember reading

381
00:24:58.400 --> 00:25:02.759
<v Speaker 5>about that is the chapter in g Hancock's book, like

382
00:25:03.039 --> 00:25:11.880
<v Speaker 5>ten years ago. What's it called? I forget the everybody's

383
00:25:12.200 --> 00:25:14.519
<v Speaker 5>familiar with this Graham Hancock, but not the one about

384
00:25:14.559 --> 00:25:16.160
<v Speaker 5>the Ark of the Covenant, the other one about the

385
00:25:16.160 --> 00:25:19.880
<v Speaker 5>Pyramids and the lay lines and all that, and I just,

386
00:25:20.200 --> 00:25:22.720
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's interesting. I don't know what the real

387
00:25:22.759 --> 00:25:25.960
<v Speaker 5>story about the Voyenans Manuscript is, but I think a

388
00:25:25.960 --> 00:25:30.039
<v Speaker 5>lot of that ancient mystical, you know, civilization stuff is

389
00:25:30.079 --> 00:25:33.400
<v Speaker 5>really fascinating. But once, like one thing, you realize that

390
00:25:33.759 --> 00:25:35.039
<v Speaker 5>if you start to read about a bunch of that

391
00:25:35.160 --> 00:25:38.119
<v Speaker 5>is like there's just really no conclusive any you can

392
00:25:38.160 --> 00:25:41.200
<v Speaker 5>never get anything conclusive about that. It's kind of like

393
00:25:41.240 --> 00:25:45.799
<v Speaker 5>all these so called UFO videos. It's like, what is

394
00:25:45.799 --> 00:25:48.279
<v Speaker 5>this blurry light? I don't know and you can never

395
00:25:48.599 --> 00:25:50.319
<v Speaker 5>figure it out, you know what I mean? What's this

396
00:25:50.519 --> 00:25:54.680
<v Speaker 5>blurry creature? Who is that bigfoot? How come it's always blurry?

397
00:25:54.759 --> 00:25:57.319
<v Speaker 5>Like you can never so it never goes anywhere. So

398
00:25:57.519 --> 00:26:00.480
<v Speaker 5>I don't I haven't thought about the Voyeness manuscript maybe

399
00:26:00.519 --> 00:26:04.480
<v Speaker 5>ten years, but it is interesting. Jen Lamb says, for

400
00:26:04.480 --> 00:26:09.200
<v Speaker 5>fifty dollars, sorry, here's another donation for my atonement. Your atonement.

401
00:26:09.359 --> 00:26:11.960
<v Speaker 5>You don't have to atone. To me, you're thinking of

402
00:26:11.960 --> 00:26:14.920
<v Speaker 5>the papal system. I'm catching up on all your videos.

403
00:26:14.960 --> 00:26:16.839
<v Speaker 5>I can honestly say that people just don't want to

404
00:26:16.839 --> 00:26:19.680
<v Speaker 5>hear the truth. I've tried turning even my friends onto

405
00:26:19.720 --> 00:26:23.599
<v Speaker 5>your material and they can't take it. That's what I'm

406
00:26:23.599 --> 00:26:27.519
<v Speaker 5>talking about. We're well, I mean, I guess that means

407
00:26:27.519 --> 00:26:30.359
<v Speaker 5>we're hardcore over here. People just can't take it. They

408
00:26:30.440 --> 00:26:36.079
<v Speaker 5>just can't take it. I hope we get some oh,

409
00:26:36.119 --> 00:26:38.440
<v Speaker 5>he says, I've learned my theology from a lot of

410
00:26:38.440 --> 00:26:42.720
<v Speaker 5>different theological arguments. Okay, I'm about ready to just block this, dude.

411
00:26:42.720 --> 00:26:45.160
<v Speaker 5>This is a waste of everybody's time. And none of

412
00:26:45.200 --> 00:26:46.680
<v Speaker 5>these people are ever gonna come to debate. We know

413
00:26:46.720 --> 00:26:50.160
<v Speaker 5>that already. They never do. I mean, good grief, dude,

414
00:26:51.000 --> 00:26:53.799
<v Speaker 5>did anybody here last night's stream? It was just on

415
00:26:54.480 --> 00:26:58.599
<v Speaker 5>real Whenever you think like you've heard the worst, like

416
00:26:59.720 --> 00:27:03.400
<v Speaker 5>the can always come through to top everybody in just

417
00:27:04.359 --> 00:27:09.480
<v Speaker 5>pitiful argumentation. And it's just sad man. Because and by

418
00:27:09.519 --> 00:27:12.480
<v Speaker 5>the way, it's what we're going to be contending with

419
00:27:12.680 --> 00:27:17.160
<v Speaker 5>in the future is not Frank and his Skittles cult. Okay,

420
00:27:17.640 --> 00:27:21.640
<v Speaker 5>that's dying out. And don't believe these idiot Roman Catholics

421
00:27:21.680 --> 00:27:25.279
<v Speaker 5>who act like it's growing. Frank's Skittles cult is dying out.

422
00:27:25.519 --> 00:27:30.480
<v Speaker 5>Where we're going to be dealing with is Islam. That's

423
00:27:30.480 --> 00:27:33.839
<v Speaker 5>what's coming. A few months ago, when Jamie and I

424
00:27:33.960 --> 00:27:35.839
<v Speaker 5>drove to Las Vegas, which was a huge mistake to

425
00:27:35.920 --> 00:27:38.119
<v Speaker 5>drive the Las Vegas by the way, what did I

426
00:27:38.200 --> 00:27:41.160
<v Speaker 5>see all across the country that I've never seen before,

427
00:27:41.559 --> 00:27:46.279
<v Speaker 5>even on Indian reservations, mosques, Indian reservations now have mosques

428
00:27:46.319 --> 00:27:50.880
<v Speaker 5>built on them, and the Tate sphere and all these

429
00:27:50.880 --> 00:27:54.200
<v Speaker 5>goobers and the Mohammed hjabsphere. They're all part of this

430
00:27:54.279 --> 00:28:02.319
<v Speaker 5>push to convert this country to the idiot religion of Islam,

431
00:28:02.440 --> 00:28:06.680
<v Speaker 5>and the dumber everybody gets, the more likely people will

432
00:28:06.680 --> 00:28:10.359
<v Speaker 5>be to convert to that. Gazoro ten dollars? Will you

433
00:28:10.400 --> 00:28:14.200
<v Speaker 5>ever look into debating Needgod dot net? Is that that evangelical,

434
00:28:14.319 --> 00:28:19.079
<v Speaker 5>goofy guy that Kyle tried to debate? I mean, anybody

435
00:28:19.079 --> 00:28:20.920
<v Speaker 5>can hop on these streams and debate if they want

436
00:28:20.920 --> 00:28:23.400
<v Speaker 5>to at any time. It's always open for him. I

437
00:28:23.400 --> 00:28:25.720
<v Speaker 5>don't know if I would even I mean, because I

438
00:28:25.720 --> 00:28:27.319
<v Speaker 5>can already tell you what's gonna happen, Like I'm gonna

439
00:28:27.359 --> 00:28:31.799
<v Speaker 5>be really, you know, serious and focused and make a

440
00:28:31.839 --> 00:28:34.920
<v Speaker 5>bunch of arguments, and it's going to turn into I'll

441
00:28:34.960 --> 00:28:38.839
<v Speaker 5>say something and then his soft evangelical you know, Skittle's

442
00:28:38.880 --> 00:28:41.279
<v Speaker 5>heart will be hurt, and then it'll turn into how

443
00:28:41.319 --> 00:28:43.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm a bad person and I'm mean all this nonsense.

444
00:28:43.960 --> 00:28:45.400
<v Speaker 5>So I don't even know if it's worth it. Blood

445
00:28:45.480 --> 00:28:48.759
<v Speaker 5>du Boy twenty dollars. Did you see Tim Gordon's new

446
00:28:48.839 --> 00:28:51.720
<v Speaker 5>video about why he thinks orthodoxy fails. Actually, if we

447
00:28:51.759 --> 00:28:54.279
<v Speaker 5>didn't get many people popping into the Q and A here,

448
00:28:54.319 --> 00:28:57.400
<v Speaker 5>I was actually going to respond to that today. I

449
00:28:57.519 --> 00:29:00.519
<v Speaker 5>might pop over there and check out of that here

450
00:29:00.519 --> 00:29:01.519
<v Speaker 5>in a minute. By the way, if you want to

451
00:29:01.519 --> 00:29:04.279
<v Speaker 5>follow me on X, be sure and follow me right here.

452
00:29:05.599 --> 00:29:08.000
<v Speaker 5>But I mean, if that guy's a fourteen year old dude,

453
00:29:08.039 --> 00:29:09.359
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if he is. But if he is,

454
00:29:09.359 --> 00:29:12.480
<v Speaker 5>isn't that like ridiculous? The whole Roman Catholic world's like

455
00:29:12.519 --> 00:29:15.599
<v Speaker 5>tweeting this kid as if this is like some kind

456
00:29:15.640 --> 00:29:18.279
<v Speaker 5>of big win, because like he spent a couple of

457
00:29:18.319 --> 00:29:22.720
<v Speaker 5>months listening to Luigi and Orthodox Kyle, but and then

458
00:29:22.759 --> 00:29:28.759
<v Speaker 5>he chose Rome. I mean, come on, uh, Kyle already

459
00:29:28.799 --> 00:29:31.559
<v Speaker 5>talked to need God dot net and the guy didn't listen. Yeah,

460
00:29:31.599 --> 00:29:33.680
<v Speaker 5>I remember that debate when that happened a while back.

461
00:29:34.119 --> 00:29:37.960
<v Speaker 5>It was a kind of a goofy debate. Let's see

462
00:29:38.000 --> 00:29:41.559
<v Speaker 5>where is how long was Tim's stream? I want to

463
00:29:41.599 --> 00:29:42.720
<v Speaker 5>open it up. I don't know if we want to.

464
00:29:42.720 --> 00:29:45.400
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if I want to spend Did you

465
00:29:45.480 --> 00:29:50.720
<v Speaker 5>do a like a two hour stream on orthodoxy? Why

466
00:29:50.880 --> 00:29:55.400
<v Speaker 5>orthodoxy fails? Let's see it. What's Part one, Welcome to

467
00:29:55.480 --> 00:29:58.599
<v Speaker 5>rules for retrogrades. I've not seen it yet, but what

468
00:29:58.640 --> 00:30:01.079
<v Speaker 5>I've heard is everybody says that it's like just like

469
00:30:01.240 --> 00:30:06.480
<v Speaker 5>loft in tier like low tier arguments, which doesn't surprise me,

470
00:30:06.799 --> 00:30:09.000
<v Speaker 5>not because Tim's dumb, but if you talk to Tim,

471
00:30:09.039 --> 00:30:11.759
<v Speaker 5>and if you listen to Tim, he'll always tell you, like,

472
00:30:11.880 --> 00:30:14.039
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that theology in the Church history that well,

473
00:30:14.559 --> 00:30:18.960
<v Speaker 5>he'll just say straight up, all I study is aristotomism.

474
00:30:20.319 --> 00:30:23.920
<v Speaker 5>So it's not surprising to me that if he were

475
00:30:23.960 --> 00:30:26.440
<v Speaker 5>to say why he's not Orthodox, it would be kind

476
00:30:26.480 --> 00:30:30.599
<v Speaker 5>of the pop sphere stuff. So it looks like there's

477
00:30:30.640 --> 00:30:33.440
<v Speaker 5>just two videos thirty minutes.

478
00:30:33.519 --> 00:30:34.799
<v Speaker 9>Ye help.

479
00:30:36.720 --> 00:30:38.720
<v Speaker 5>But I mean, I mean I saw a couple of

480
00:30:38.759 --> 00:30:41.400
<v Speaker 5>the quote minds that Tim put up, and they were like,

481
00:30:41.720 --> 00:30:44.799
<v Speaker 5>come on, this is like this is weak tier stuff

482
00:30:44.799 --> 00:30:49.839
<v Speaker 5>that doesn't prove Vatican One. So basically, as you might imagine,

483
00:30:50.759 --> 00:30:52.920
<v Speaker 5>as many Roman Catholics do, they just quote mind a

484
00:30:52.920 --> 00:30:55.279
<v Speaker 5>bunch of things about Rome in the first thousand years,

485
00:30:55.359 --> 00:30:57.319
<v Speaker 5>and then they read into that Vatican One when none

486
00:30:57.319 --> 00:31:00.839
<v Speaker 5>of those quotes actually address or prove Vatican one claims,

487
00:31:01.519 --> 00:31:07.759
<v Speaker 5>and they don't deal with the problems to the Vatican

488
00:31:07.799 --> 00:31:10.839
<v Speaker 5>one claims in the first thousand years, or the contradictions

489
00:31:11.319 --> 00:31:14.519
<v Speaker 5>involved in the claims of the papacy quote never airing,

490
00:31:14.880 --> 00:31:19.640
<v Speaker 5>never defecting, never, you know, failing to preserve the faith

491
00:31:20.200 --> 00:31:23.039
<v Speaker 5>aka as Ubi brings up in the debate, Well, you

492
00:31:23.079 --> 00:31:26.720
<v Speaker 5>have one pope deposing and excommunicating the previous pope in

493
00:31:26.759 --> 00:31:31.119
<v Speaker 5>the case of Vigilius. So did Rome air and defect

494
00:31:31.200 --> 00:31:35.400
<v Speaker 5>when the previous pope was condemned or was Virgilius wrong

495
00:31:35.519 --> 00:31:39.440
<v Speaker 5>in condemning his predecessor? It was the very thing that

496
00:31:41.240 --> 00:31:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Ubi asks a bar in the debate, and Eric said,

497
00:31:44.559 --> 00:31:47.640
<v Speaker 5>I don't got good intro to and uh, I don't

498
00:31:47.759 --> 00:31:53.759
<v Speaker 5>have to give back to your own debate voice of reason. Bro,

499
00:31:54.440 --> 00:31:57.240
<v Speaker 5>all these people that everybody's asking, like I've already asked

500
00:31:57.240 --> 00:32:00.920
<v Speaker 5>all these people debate, he just ignored it. And boys,

501
00:32:00.960 --> 00:32:04.759
<v Speaker 5>the reason already debated. Luisian lost. So and by the way,

502
00:32:04.759 --> 00:32:07.000
<v Speaker 5>all these people can come to this stream if they want,

503
00:32:07.079 --> 00:32:09.400
<v Speaker 5>really want a debate, So why don't they come and

504
00:32:09.440 --> 00:32:10.880
<v Speaker 5>to hop in my stream they can have all the

505
00:32:10.880 --> 00:32:14.359
<v Speaker 5>time they want. All right, let's open it up to

506
00:32:15.240 --> 00:32:17.759
<v Speaker 5>anybody who disagrees. If we don't get I might play

507
00:32:17.799 --> 00:32:19.680
<v Speaker 5>some of this Tim stuff here and see what his

508
00:32:19.759 --> 00:32:23.680
<v Speaker 5>arguments against Orthodoxy Warrior, we'll respond to them. Low Pan

509
00:32:23.799 --> 00:32:26.240
<v Speaker 5>says for ten dollars. This is off topic, but check

510
00:32:26.240 --> 00:32:29.720
<v Speaker 5>out special Interest, the State and the Anglo American Alliance.

511
00:32:30.559 --> 00:32:32.880
<v Speaker 5>It is a ruttlish publication. Yeah. Actually I put that

512
00:32:32.960 --> 00:32:35.039
<v Speaker 5>on my two gif book list. I think thank you

513
00:32:35.079 --> 00:32:37.640
<v Speaker 5>for that. That was probably you that recommended that. Low

514
00:32:37.680 --> 00:32:41.920
<v Speaker 5>Pan appreciate it. An emotional appeal. Tim Gordon one dollars. Tim,

515
00:32:42.039 --> 00:32:44.119
<v Speaker 5>No rigor Gordon needs to be put to rest with

516
00:32:44.160 --> 00:32:46.799
<v Speaker 5>these bad arguments. I'm tired of all his misleading presentation.

517
00:32:47.680 --> 00:32:49.480
<v Speaker 5>Well we'll look at some of these then and see

518
00:32:49.519 --> 00:32:51.279
<v Speaker 5>where he went with it. I guess I do need

519
00:32:51.319 --> 00:32:54.160
<v Speaker 5>to respond to it. Frankish Melkite five dollars, blessings. Jay.

520
00:32:55.000 --> 00:32:58.480
<v Speaker 5>I had a question about Orthodoxy and your understanding of imputation.

521
00:32:59.039 --> 00:33:00.599
<v Speaker 5>You had a debate with an event Jelica one time.

522
00:33:00.599 --> 00:33:03.599
<v Speaker 5>It was arguing that Romans four said that it was imputation,

523
00:33:03.720 --> 00:33:06.119
<v Speaker 5>and you said, there is a kind of imputation, but

524
00:33:06.200 --> 00:33:09.240
<v Speaker 5>in an Orthodox sense. Yeah, in the Orthodox view, there's

525
00:33:09.279 --> 00:33:12.000
<v Speaker 5>no such thing as a purely legal standing that's not

526
00:33:12.160 --> 00:33:15.720
<v Speaker 5>based in ontological reality. In other words, you couldn't be

527
00:33:16.599 --> 00:33:20.720
<v Speaker 5>legally righteous with an imputed covering of righteousness while you

528
00:33:20.759 --> 00:33:24.680
<v Speaker 5>are in actual reality quote, filthy, rags and wicked. That

529
00:33:24.720 --> 00:33:27.480
<v Speaker 5>would make God a liar. So anytime there is a

530
00:33:27.720 --> 00:33:31.039
<v Speaker 5>pronunciation of you being righteous, it is because you are

531
00:33:31.039 --> 00:33:35.680
<v Speaker 5>in fact righteous. That simple and Protestanism had to have

532
00:33:35.880 --> 00:33:41.200
<v Speaker 5>nominalism be the case to be the case philosophically for

533
00:33:41.240 --> 00:33:44.799
<v Speaker 5>there to be a divorce between the pronunciation of being

534
00:33:44.880 --> 00:33:48.400
<v Speaker 5>righteous and the actual ontological status of being righteous. Literally,

535
00:33:48.440 --> 00:33:51.240
<v Speaker 5>Protestantism solo fid a doctrine is built on that, and

536
00:33:51.279 --> 00:33:54.680
<v Speaker 5>if that's not true, then that doctrine falls apart. And

537
00:33:54.759 --> 00:33:57.400
<v Speaker 5>it also is a historical because nobody in the ancient

538
00:33:57.400 --> 00:34:00.880
<v Speaker 5>medieval world was a nominalist, the tel nominalism in the

539
00:34:00.920 --> 00:34:03.279
<v Speaker 5>Middle Ages, so they did not and could not have

540
00:34:03.400 --> 00:34:11.639
<v Speaker 5>conceived of a purely legal, fictional imputational righteous status that

541
00:34:11.719 --> 00:34:15.519
<v Speaker 5>does not correspond to actually ontologically being righteous aka having

542
00:34:15.840 --> 00:34:19.400
<v Speaker 5>the Divine life in you dose Vader, fifteen dollars, do

543
00:34:19.440 --> 00:34:24.000
<v Speaker 5>you intend to drop Vatican two and the related documents

544
00:34:24.039 --> 00:34:26.639
<v Speaker 5>to disprove Sam schimun I would be down to call

545
00:34:26.679 --> 00:34:29.360
<v Speaker 5>in and tell him about Vatican two. Well, if we

546
00:34:29.400 --> 00:34:32.840
<v Speaker 5>do that, roundtable. Obviously, I'll be bringing up all those documents. Sure,

547
00:34:33.639 --> 00:34:36.239
<v Speaker 5>I don't know to what degree Sam Shimun is familiar

548
00:34:36.239 --> 00:34:40.199
<v Speaker 5>with those documents. But I don't think Sam's idea is

549
00:34:40.239 --> 00:34:44.400
<v Speaker 5>to have him and Allbrech versus me and Ubi. Sam

550
00:34:44.559 --> 00:34:48.440
<v Speaker 5>claims that it's going to be a roundtable of me

551
00:34:48.559 --> 00:34:53.400
<v Speaker 5>and Ubi and somebody and yah See and Albrecht or something.

552
00:34:55.000 --> 00:34:59.480
<v Speaker 5>I think that's what Sam has in money, Robney five dollars. Well,

553
00:34:59.559 --> 00:35:02.079
<v Speaker 5>are you tried about Christian Christianity and the Christian herishies

554
00:35:02.079 --> 00:35:04.000
<v Speaker 5>of Syria after the takeover? I mean, I just shared

555
00:35:04.239 --> 00:35:07.679
<v Speaker 5>Kovork Elmasian's video on that that followed John White for

556
00:35:07.719 --> 00:35:10.719
<v Speaker 5>shared I've followed Kovork's stuff off and on. I did

557
00:35:10.800 --> 00:35:14.360
<v Speaker 5>actually realized he was Christian or that his family was.

558
00:35:14.440 --> 00:35:17.199
<v Speaker 5>Maybe he isn't. I don't know, but I mean, I

559
00:35:17.199 --> 00:35:20.400
<v Speaker 5>don't I don't know what to say about. I mean,

560
00:35:20.440 --> 00:35:23.000
<v Speaker 5>I've been talking, we've been talking about Syria and the

561
00:35:23.079 --> 00:35:27.280
<v Speaker 5>CIA's operations in Syria and all of that geopolitically, going

562
00:35:27.320 --> 00:35:29.159
<v Speaker 5>back to when I was writing for twenty first Century

563
00:35:29.159 --> 00:35:33.519
<v Speaker 5>a while with Patrick Henningson in twenty fourteen. So, I mean,

564
00:35:33.519 --> 00:35:35.920
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what else what what do you want

565
00:35:35.960 --> 00:35:40.199
<v Speaker 5>me to say? Like, yeah, the CIA and the State

566
00:35:40.239 --> 00:35:44.000
<v Speaker 5>of Israel support things like isis of course, duh. I

567
00:35:44.000 --> 00:35:46.760
<v Speaker 5>mean we've been talking about that for years, over a decade.

568
00:35:47.679 --> 00:35:53.039
<v Speaker 5>So where the apology is for like, you know, me

569
00:35:53.199 --> 00:35:54.719
<v Speaker 5>talking about this or other people said it was a

570
00:35:54.760 --> 00:35:57.440
<v Speaker 5>crazy conspiracy theorist for talking about this since twenty fourteen

571
00:35:57.920 --> 00:36:00.199
<v Speaker 5>Aqi Lara's five dollars. I'm not trying to be I'm

572
00:36:00.199 --> 00:36:03.679
<v Speaker 5>not trying to be insensitive to you know, Christians in Syria,

573
00:36:03.760 --> 00:36:08.000
<v Speaker 5>but like, what what are we supposed to do? Like

574
00:36:08.360 --> 00:36:10.519
<v Speaker 5>you can only go so far on YouTube. I mean,

575
00:36:12.760 --> 00:36:14.199
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, I don't know what the answer is.

576
00:36:18.280 --> 00:36:22.559
<v Speaker 5>Maybe the answer is to defeat the heresy of dispensationalism

577
00:36:22.760 --> 00:36:27.199
<v Speaker 5>so that people in America stop believing this stupid, idiotic

578
00:36:27.280 --> 00:36:31.079
<v Speaker 5>heresy where whereby they basically think the Nation of Israel

579
00:36:31.159 --> 00:36:36.639
<v Speaker 5>is the Church, which is just looney bins. But somebody,

580
00:36:36.679 --> 00:36:38.960
<v Speaker 5>Luigi I think, was calling out one of these evangelical

581
00:36:39.000 --> 00:36:41.679
<v Speaker 5>pastors who has like the nation State of Israel flag

582
00:36:41.679 --> 00:36:43.800
<v Speaker 5>and his profile, like he doesn't even have a Christian

583
00:36:44.639 --> 00:36:48.119
<v Speaker 5>flag in his profile. It's like, okay, so you're actually

584
00:36:48.760 --> 00:36:52.519
<v Speaker 5>not Christian exactly. It's just it is weird how many

585
00:36:52.559 --> 00:36:57.599
<v Speaker 5>people believe this dispensationalist heresy, and it's so easy to refute.

586
00:36:58.320 --> 00:37:00.159
<v Speaker 5>You know, we did this that stream of Jimbo I've

587
00:37:00.159 --> 00:37:02.480
<v Speaker 5>been polish. I though it turned out to be a

588
00:37:02.519 --> 00:37:05.360
<v Speaker 5>really good stream. It is long, it's four hours, but

589
00:37:05.400 --> 00:37:09.679
<v Speaker 5>I mean it took four hours to thoroughly demolish. I

590
00:37:09.719 --> 00:37:14.599
<v Speaker 5>think every aspect and angle of dispensationalism, from its history

591
00:37:14.960 --> 00:37:19.800
<v Speaker 5>to its theology, to its deep state geopolitical promotion and implications.

592
00:37:19.840 --> 00:37:27.280
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we went through all of it. So, I mean,

593
00:37:27.320 --> 00:37:30.920
<v Speaker 5>I think to have an effect in the Middle East

594
00:37:31.039 --> 00:37:34.960
<v Speaker 5>requires a change in American foreign policy. To have a

595
00:37:35.000 --> 00:37:40.159
<v Speaker 5>change in American war policy requires time and effort to

596
00:37:40.960 --> 00:37:47.119
<v Speaker 5>refute the stupid dispensationalist Premillennials heresy. And so that's going

597
00:37:47.199 --> 00:37:51.840
<v Speaker 5>to happen for people becoming Orthodox. So I don't know

598
00:37:51.880 --> 00:37:55.639
<v Speaker 5>what other route to take. Aculars five dollars, Jay, I'm

599
00:37:55.639 --> 00:37:57.360
<v Speaker 5>a longtime viewer and I'm now at Orthodox kind of

600
00:37:57.440 --> 00:37:59.719
<v Speaker 5>human things thanks to you. Would you how would your

601
00:37:59.719 --> 00:38:03.199
<v Speaker 5>Aply somebody says they believe in morals in a higher power,

602
00:38:03.280 --> 00:38:06.079
<v Speaker 5>but I'm not a Christian. Basically, their deists. How would

603
00:38:06.079 --> 00:38:08.800
<v Speaker 5>you respond to that? Well, I mean, this is really

604
00:38:08.840 --> 00:38:10.679
<v Speaker 5>just kind of an empty phrase and statement. I mean,

605
00:38:10.719 --> 00:38:13.079
<v Speaker 5>what does it even mean to say I believe in

606
00:38:13.119 --> 00:38:15.000
<v Speaker 5>morals and a higher power? What if I believe the

607
00:38:15.079 --> 00:38:16.920
<v Speaker 5>higher power Satan and the morals that he gives me

608
00:38:16.960 --> 00:38:21.079
<v Speaker 5>are to you know, steal, kill and destroy? Right? What

609
00:38:21.159 --> 00:38:23.960
<v Speaker 5>does Conan say that he can't wait to hit that

610
00:38:24.039 --> 00:38:27.719
<v Speaker 5>advantation of the women to you know whatever Conan's phrased? Like,

611
00:38:27.719 --> 00:38:28.719
<v Speaker 5>what if those are the morals?

612
00:38:28.719 --> 00:38:28.800
<v Speaker 7>Like?

613
00:38:28.840 --> 00:38:31.519
<v Speaker 5>Why is that wrong? So, in other words, it's not

614
00:38:31.559 --> 00:38:33.440
<v Speaker 5>good enough to just say that quote there's a higher

615
00:38:33.480 --> 00:38:34.280
<v Speaker 5>power in morals.

616
00:38:34.280 --> 00:38:34.719
<v Speaker 9>This is like.

617
00:38:36.880 --> 00:38:41.159
<v Speaker 5>Alcoholics anonymous level theology, which is basically just meaningless. I mean,

618
00:38:41.159 --> 00:38:43.480
<v Speaker 5>what does that mean? So you got to have some

619
00:38:43.559 --> 00:38:46.320
<v Speaker 5>kind of content to who the deity is and what

620
00:38:46.360 --> 00:38:49.800
<v Speaker 5>the worldview is. So I would just critique the worldview

621
00:38:50.000 --> 00:38:52.159
<v Speaker 5>at that kind of presubsisitional level. Guy M ten dollars,

622
00:38:52.159 --> 00:38:55.159
<v Speaker 5>thank you for everything that you do. I looked into

623
00:38:55.159 --> 00:38:59.119
<v Speaker 5>the early Church and I ended up leaving Calvinism before

624
00:38:59.199 --> 00:39:03.719
<v Speaker 5>Constant and Nope, I started attending an Antiochian Orthodox Church.

625
00:39:03.719 --> 00:39:07.400
<v Speaker 5>The liturgy is definitely the biggest event that I've ever attended.

626
00:39:07.440 --> 00:39:10.039
<v Speaker 5>I can't believe I ever felt for Calvinism. I fell

627
00:39:10.119 --> 00:39:12.320
<v Speaker 5>for Calvinism. It's okay. I mean, you know, we're all

628
00:39:12.360 --> 00:39:16.239
<v Speaker 5>going to be making these mistakes. We can't help what

629
00:39:16.280 --> 00:39:19.480
<v Speaker 5>we were raised with. So we got to be open

630
00:39:19.519 --> 00:39:23.119
<v Speaker 5>to hearing new information. But also there's a weird balance.

631
00:39:23.119 --> 00:39:24.599
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what the right answer is, but like

632
00:39:25.079 --> 00:39:27.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, we're in this era where there's an infinite

633
00:39:28.000 --> 00:39:31.920
<v Speaker 5>sea of information on the Internet, and we're always going

634
00:39:31.960 --> 00:39:34.840
<v Speaker 5>to be hearing new arguments, new challenges, new information. So

635
00:39:34.880 --> 00:39:36.599
<v Speaker 5>there's got to be some kind of balance we strike

636
00:39:36.679 --> 00:39:40.440
<v Speaker 5>between having an open mind to hear new arguments, new information,

637
00:39:41.119 --> 00:39:44.039
<v Speaker 5>and not being blown about by every wind of doctrine

638
00:39:44.039 --> 00:39:47.239
<v Speaker 5>like the New Testament says. So hopefully we can strike

639
00:39:47.320 --> 00:39:49.159
<v Speaker 5>some kind of balance there. And I think that anybody

640
00:39:49.159 --> 00:39:52.559
<v Speaker 5>who truly honestly seeks the truth, I think Christ will

641
00:39:52.639 --> 00:39:54.760
<v Speaker 5>lead them to the truth. Albanian Dude ninety eight one

642
00:39:54.800 --> 00:39:57.559
<v Speaker 5>dollars Do you think that some UFOs are demonic in origin? Yeah,

643
00:39:57.559 --> 00:39:59.199
<v Speaker 5>I think there is a demonic element to it. Even

644
00:39:59.239 --> 00:40:02.920
<v Speaker 5>some of the secular theorists like Jacques Vlaie admit there's

645
00:40:02.960 --> 00:40:05.719
<v Speaker 5>some kind of sinister, nefarious element to it. Do you

646
00:40:05.760 --> 00:40:08.159
<v Speaker 5>think the government knows and is in on it? I

647
00:40:08.199 --> 00:40:10.159
<v Speaker 5>mean to it. I mean I think the government absolutely

648
00:40:10.159 --> 00:40:13.159
<v Speaker 5>knows about the black ops, you know, alien deception crap

649
00:40:13.280 --> 00:40:15.599
<v Speaker 5>that they push, and that all the people from the

650
00:40:15.639 --> 00:40:19.159
<v Speaker 5>deep state, the aviary, you know all these you know

651
00:40:19.280 --> 00:40:22.400
<v Speaker 5>m J twelve con men, Richard Dody and go watch

652
00:40:22.440 --> 00:40:28.280
<v Speaker 5>mirage men. That's obvious. Are the drones piloted by demons? No,

653
00:40:28.440 --> 00:40:31.880
<v Speaker 5>I don't think the drunes are piloted by demons. That

654
00:40:31.920 --> 00:40:34.519
<v Speaker 5>sounds kind of funny though. Still go a our five

655
00:40:34.559 --> 00:40:41.840
<v Speaker 5>dollars your name will be more deep Jay, thank you

656
00:40:41.880 --> 00:40:44.159
<v Speaker 5>for the stream. I'm looking at orthodoxy. I'm a Jewish

657
00:40:44.159 --> 00:40:46.639
<v Speaker 5>believer in Jesus. I have a question by the influence

658
00:40:46.679 --> 00:40:50.360
<v Speaker 5>of Hellenism on Christianity and Judaism as a negative or positive. Well,

659
00:40:50.360 --> 00:40:52.360
<v Speaker 5>I think you have to be more precise, because sometimes

660
00:40:52.360 --> 00:40:56.639
<v Speaker 5>Hellenism just means Greek culture, Greek language. I don't think

661
00:40:56.719 --> 00:40:59.079
<v Speaker 5>Christianity would have spread had there not been coin a

662
00:40:59.159 --> 00:41:01.840
<v Speaker 5>Greek spoke throughout the Empire, which is an element of Hellenism.

663
00:41:02.760 --> 00:41:05.000
<v Speaker 5>If you talk about Hellenism in terms of like Greek

664
00:41:05.000 --> 00:41:08.760
<v Speaker 5>philosophy and metaphysics, that's a two edged sword that can

665
00:41:08.800 --> 00:41:13.559
<v Speaker 5>be a basis for people falling into heresies. Most of

666
00:41:13.559 --> 00:41:16.800
<v Speaker 5>the heresy arcs in the Seven Ecamenical Councils had some

667
00:41:16.920 --> 00:41:21.440
<v Speaker 5>kind of Greek metaphysical assumption that they were importing into

668
00:41:21.440 --> 00:41:25.800
<v Speaker 5>the theology, whether it's areas, whether it's Eunomius who's literally

669
00:41:25.840 --> 00:41:29.840
<v Speaker 5>a Neoplatonist, whether it's Origin, or even all the way

670
00:41:29.920 --> 00:41:33.880
<v Speaker 5>up into Severus. Severus himself had Neoplatonic assumption. So I

671
00:41:33.920 --> 00:41:37.960
<v Speaker 5>mean just depends on what you mean. There's also harmless

672
00:41:38.000 --> 00:41:41.840
<v Speaker 5>cultural elements of quote Hellenism that are part of the

673
00:41:41.920 --> 00:41:45.760
<v Speaker 5>Church's tradition little tea tradition. For example, the style of

674
00:41:45.800 --> 00:41:49.639
<v Speaker 5>the vestiments is not just Hebrew and origin out of

675
00:41:49.679 --> 00:41:52.679
<v Speaker 5>coming out of the Jewish priesthood, but it also bears

676
00:41:52.840 --> 00:41:56.679
<v Speaker 5>a Byzantine stamp to the vestiments. And so obviously the

677
00:41:56.760 --> 00:41:59.920
<v Speaker 5>Church is going to have it's kind of unique history

678
00:41:59.760 --> 00:42:04.840
<v Speaker 5>that influences the Hebrew origins. So I think there's a

679
00:42:05.679 --> 00:42:08.880
<v Speaker 5>both and flexibility going on here. But no, we don't

680
00:42:08.920 --> 00:42:11.480
<v Speaker 5>want the degenerate elements of Hellenic culture, which the Book

681
00:42:11.480 --> 00:42:17.880
<v Speaker 5>of maccabeeest for example, calls out, you know, like naked

682
00:42:17.960 --> 00:42:21.800
<v Speaker 5>men and bathroom stalls and naked men wrestling. That's all

683
00:42:21.840 --> 00:42:25.719
<v Speaker 5>Hellenic Greek cultures, you know stuff. So no, we don't

684
00:42:25.719 --> 00:42:27.039
<v Speaker 5>want none of that. We don't know. We don't know

685
00:42:27.119 --> 00:42:33.119
<v Speaker 5>skittle soldiers like the three hundred or whatever. But using

686
00:42:33.440 --> 00:42:37.360
<v Speaker 5>ideas or toolkits from Greek philosophy can help theology. That's

687
00:42:37.400 --> 00:42:40.800
<v Speaker 5>part of the Church's tradition. Anonymous, five dollars. We're both open.

688
00:42:40.920 --> 00:42:44.119
<v Speaker 5>There's a last two super jets. What would you say

689
00:42:44.159 --> 00:42:48.039
<v Speaker 5>about your use of tag and precept as a substance

690
00:42:48.079 --> 00:42:50.920
<v Speaker 5>of logic rather than a self evident given from a

691
00:42:50.960 --> 00:42:56.280
<v Speaker 5>worldview without any transcental justification. What would you what would

692
00:42:56.360 --> 00:43:00.079
<v Speaker 5>you say that your use of tag and precept is

693
00:43:00.079 --> 00:43:03.960
<v Speaker 5>the substance of logic? I don't know if i'd say that.

694
00:43:04.000 --> 00:43:06.519
<v Speaker 5>I would just say that the point of pre subpositional

695
00:43:06.599 --> 00:43:10.519
<v Speaker 5>argumentation or transcendenttal augmentation is simply to talk about the

696
00:43:10.599 --> 00:43:14.519
<v Speaker 5>possibility of doing logic, the possibility of knowing at all,

697
00:43:14.559 --> 00:43:17.159
<v Speaker 5>the possibility of having metaphysics at all. So there are

698
00:43:17.239 --> 00:43:20.960
<v Speaker 5>arguments about the necessary preconditions. I don't know if I

699
00:43:20.960 --> 00:43:24.000
<v Speaker 5>would call the necessary precondition quote the substance of logic,

700
00:43:25.039 --> 00:43:29.960
<v Speaker 5>but I do agree that it is fundamentally opposed to

701
00:43:30.000 --> 00:43:33.960
<v Speaker 5>the idea of something strictly literally being self evident. I

702
00:43:33.960 --> 00:43:36.199
<v Speaker 5>think we can have a colloquial sense of something being

703
00:43:36.239 --> 00:43:40.360
<v Speaker 5>self evident, like does tuplus to equal four? Yeah, we

704
00:43:40.440 --> 00:43:44.679
<v Speaker 5>kind of intuitively apprehend that without much investments. We don't

705
00:43:44.719 --> 00:43:48.159
<v Speaker 5>have to investigate every time we add two plus two

706
00:43:48.159 --> 00:43:50.360
<v Speaker 5>to see if, in fact it does all wes equal four.

707
00:43:50.400 --> 00:43:55.840
<v Speaker 5>We kind of have this eventual, kind of instantaneous apprehension

708
00:43:55.880 --> 00:43:59.440
<v Speaker 5>that it is correct. And so, in that limited sense,

709
00:44:00.039 --> 00:44:02.519
<v Speaker 5>kind of a mundane colloquial sense, you could call something

710
00:44:02.599 --> 00:44:07.639
<v Speaker 5>self evident, but in a strict epistemic sense, know, how

711
00:44:07.679 --> 00:44:09.920
<v Speaker 5>could something I mean, anytime people try to argue for this,

712
00:44:10.000 --> 00:44:12.239
<v Speaker 5>they just really end up missing the point and just

713
00:44:12.280 --> 00:44:15.719
<v Speaker 5>restating the problem and you know, relying on something else,

714
00:44:15.800 --> 00:44:18.559
<v Speaker 5>which then makes the first thing not self evident. If

715
00:44:18.559 --> 00:44:21.519
<v Speaker 5>it's relying on something, it's not self evident. If it's

716
00:44:21.519 --> 00:44:23.800
<v Speaker 5>self evident, we need to know why it's self evident.

717
00:44:23.800 --> 00:44:26.039
<v Speaker 5>We need to solve the criterion problem, et cetera. Et cetera.

718
00:44:27.280 --> 00:44:31.199
<v Speaker 5>Public Cort says, one dollar orthodox that downplay the Eastern fathers,

719
00:44:32.840 --> 00:44:38.000
<v Speaker 5>who would this be like weird Latin Western right people.

720
00:44:38.039 --> 00:44:42.039
<v Speaker 5>I don't know the ones that exults. You're talking about

721
00:44:42.039 --> 00:44:43.079
<v Speaker 5>Western right people.

722
00:44:45.800 --> 00:44:46.000
<v Speaker 9>Out.

723
00:44:46.079 --> 00:44:48.000
<v Speaker 5>You just have a sentence. It's not a question, so

724
00:44:48.000 --> 00:44:53.159
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure what the question is. Yeah, I'm not

725
00:44:53.159 --> 00:44:55.159
<v Speaker 5>a huge fan of the Western right, so I don't

726
00:44:55.960 --> 00:44:58.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure what the question is. Jorda on five dollars.

727
00:44:59.119 --> 00:45:00.920
<v Speaker 5>I love to stream, yes, what they do with Sam.

728
00:45:01.480 --> 00:45:09.559
<v Speaker 5>I'm assuming you're talking about that and God Logic. Would

729
00:45:09.599 --> 00:45:14.039
<v Speaker 5>you do a stream with God Logic on PSA and

730
00:45:14.079 --> 00:45:17.199
<v Speaker 5>the Protestant doctrines? Sure, I'm always open to any kind

731
00:45:17.199 --> 00:45:20.960
<v Speaker 5>of chat like that. Nicholas Palomas one dollar. Did you

732
00:45:21.000 --> 00:45:26.639
<v Speaker 5>see Chris Plants gave up on being intellectually rigorous because

733
00:45:26.679 --> 00:45:29.679
<v Speaker 5>he did a short video summary of Ubi and Abara debate. No,

734
00:45:29.760 --> 00:45:31.719
<v Speaker 5>I didn't see. I haven't kept up with what Chris

735
00:45:31.719 --> 00:45:34.719
<v Speaker 5>Plants was talking about. I'm not trying to be mean,

736
00:45:34.800 --> 00:45:37.559
<v Speaker 5>but you know, it felt like when we had that

737
00:45:38.239 --> 00:45:39.360
<v Speaker 5>sort of debate that.

738
00:45:40.880 --> 00:45:41.559
<v Speaker 10>I don't know, I don't know.

739
00:45:41.559 --> 00:45:43.119
<v Speaker 5>What else to say. All Right, we're gonna open it up.

740
00:45:43.679 --> 00:45:45.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna get priority to people who disagree. If you're

741
00:45:45.840 --> 00:45:48.280
<v Speaker 5>a Catholic, if you're a Protestant, if you're Muslim, if

742
00:45:48.280 --> 00:45:50.119
<v Speaker 5>you're atheist, you go to the head of the line.

743
00:45:51.000 --> 00:45:55.119
<v Speaker 5>If you have questions about you know, other stuff FAQ questions,

744
00:45:55.800 --> 00:45:59.039
<v Speaker 5>please save those till later. Uh, don't rush to the

745
00:45:59.079 --> 00:46:01.719
<v Speaker 5>head of line with you know, questions that literally you

746
00:46:01.719 --> 00:46:04.320
<v Speaker 5>could get your priest to answer in catechistus. I mean

747
00:46:04.760 --> 00:46:06.440
<v Speaker 5>not trying to be rude. It's just we always get

748
00:46:06.440 --> 00:46:09.960
<v Speaker 5>people piling in with you know, what's the problem with

749
00:46:10.239 --> 00:46:16.639
<v Speaker 5>penal substitution? What is the Orthodox feel and Balmintism. We're

750
00:46:16.639 --> 00:46:19.639
<v Speaker 5>going to open it up now to let's see inquisitor.

751
00:46:19.920 --> 00:46:26.639
<v Speaker 5>We got We've got an inquisitor. We got a Spanish inquisitor.

752
00:46:28.159 --> 00:46:32.599
<v Speaker 5>Queen Isabella has sent our destruction into the chat. What's up?

753
00:46:32.639 --> 00:46:32.800
<v Speaker 9>Man?

754
00:46:37.480 --> 00:46:44.119
<v Speaker 5>Got on mute and he ran away? Good job. So

755
00:46:44.719 --> 00:46:54.599
<v Speaker 5>there's our first Roman Catholic an inquisitor who literally just

756
00:46:54.679 --> 00:46:57.679
<v Speaker 5>ran away. Now maybe he dropped out, and if he

757
00:46:57.760 --> 00:47:01.320
<v Speaker 5>dropped out, he's welcome to come back. But I make

758
00:47:01.360 --> 00:47:04.519
<v Speaker 5>one joke. Here it comes he's back. Come on, inquisitor general,

759
00:47:04.519 --> 00:47:08.760
<v Speaker 5>what's up? Man, Let's have an auto de fay. Put

760
00:47:08.800 --> 00:47:11.280
<v Speaker 5>me burn me up, baby, Auto de fay right now,

761
00:47:11.880 --> 00:47:17.760
<v Speaker 5>got unmute? You have to unmute?

762
00:47:20.679 --> 00:47:24.719
<v Speaker 11>Oh man, I had to have the power buttons?

763
00:47:24.760 --> 00:47:25.280
<v Speaker 7>After all?

764
00:47:26.239 --> 00:47:27.039
<v Speaker 9>Am I being heard?

765
00:47:27.239 --> 00:47:27.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

766
00:47:27.440 --> 00:47:28.960
<v Speaker 5>What's up? What's on your mind?

767
00:47:30.039 --> 00:47:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Hey?

768
00:47:30.400 --> 00:47:30.719
<v Speaker 9>J J?

769
00:47:31.000 --> 00:47:31.960
<v Speaker 7>First and foremost?

770
00:47:32.039 --> 00:47:33.679
<v Speaker 12>Man, Hey, you.

771
00:47:33.639 --> 00:47:36.320
<v Speaker 11>Don't want to give you your props. Just generally speaking,

772
00:47:36.599 --> 00:47:41.280
<v Speaker 11>I think you've been a tremendous course for good. The

773
00:47:41.480 --> 00:47:47.559
<v Speaker 11>question I have for you, Jay is, you know, I think,

774
00:47:47.599 --> 00:47:51.119
<v Speaker 11>for like you know, somebody seeking the truth, they're gonna

775
00:47:51.239 --> 00:47:53.320
<v Speaker 11>end up apostolic, right.

776
00:47:54.599 --> 00:47:56.960
<v Speaker 5>And I don't know what that means.

777
00:47:57.280 --> 00:47:57.519
<v Speaker 7>I don't.

778
00:47:57.519 --> 00:47:59.599
<v Speaker 5>I don't, I mean I don't. We don't accept that

779
00:47:59.639 --> 00:48:01.719
<v Speaker 5>there are or all of these Apostolic churches that are

780
00:48:01.719 --> 00:48:04.079
<v Speaker 5>in schism.

781
00:48:04.480 --> 00:48:08.719
<v Speaker 7>You know there's two ja, come on you trump?

782
00:48:09.440 --> 00:48:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean you that you claim that, but that

783
00:48:11.840 --> 00:48:14.039
<v Speaker 5>doesn't mean that you are, because once you go into

784
00:48:14.079 --> 00:48:16.000
<v Speaker 5>heresy you're not Apostolic anymore.

785
00:48:18.039 --> 00:48:21.559
<v Speaker 11>Well you could trade your churches back to our Lord.

786
00:48:22.039 --> 00:48:26.440
<v Speaker 5>Wright or once you adopt heresy. And by the way,

787
00:48:26.440 --> 00:48:29.239
<v Speaker 5>this is actually the traditional Roman Catholic position too, you

788
00:48:29.239 --> 00:48:33.960
<v Speaker 5>are no longer a member of the mystical body agreed greed?

789
00:48:34.039 --> 00:48:35.000
<v Speaker 7>Okay, you believe?

790
00:48:35.159 --> 00:48:36.880
<v Speaker 5>How could you how could you agree to that when

791
00:48:36.880 --> 00:48:38.519
<v Speaker 5>that is contrary to what you just said?

792
00:48:40.519 --> 00:48:42.800
<v Speaker 7>What do you mean it's a country? Wait? Wait, the

793
00:48:42.840 --> 00:48:43.880
<v Speaker 7>only thing that I have.

794
00:48:43.880 --> 00:48:47.519
<v Speaker 11>Said, Jay, to be clear, is that somebody seeking the

795
00:48:47.599 --> 00:48:50.760
<v Speaker 11>truth is going to seek for something that you know,

796
00:48:50.840 --> 00:48:53.559
<v Speaker 11>reaches back to our Lord, a church that our Lord founded.

797
00:48:53.760 --> 00:48:57.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's just presupposing the Roman Catholic position that apostolic

798
00:48:57.440 --> 00:49:01.079
<v Speaker 5>means anybody who possesses Apostolic succession. And I just argued

799
00:49:01.119 --> 00:49:04.559
<v Speaker 5>against that, and that your own tradition doesn't hold that you.

800
00:49:04.519 --> 00:49:07.360
<v Speaker 13>Could have a put it this way, Jay's made this argument,

801
00:49:07.400 --> 00:49:15.480
<v Speaker 13>and I was, so you could make uh oh, okay,

802
00:49:16.079 --> 00:49:18.960
<v Speaker 13>Jay's quantum doppelganger.

803
00:49:19.840 --> 00:49:20.800
<v Speaker 9>In a multiverse.

804
00:49:21.000 --> 00:49:24.800
<v Speaker 12>Anyways, So think about how silly this is.

805
00:49:25.519 --> 00:49:29.639
<v Speaker 10>So a group can become Satanist and as long as

806
00:49:29.639 --> 00:49:33.000
<v Speaker 10>they you know, and they they skis them out of

807
00:49:33.000 --> 00:49:35.320
<v Speaker 10>the Roman Catholic Church, but as long as they just

808
00:49:36.079 --> 00:49:40.559
<v Speaker 10>trace their lineage back like then it's a historic church.

809
00:49:41.199 --> 00:49:43.400
<v Speaker 10>I mean, this is how absurd the conclusion would get.

810
00:49:45.039 --> 00:49:48.320
<v Speaker 5>It's not actually absurd. In fact, Roman Catholicism actually says

811
00:49:48.400 --> 00:49:51.559
<v Speaker 5>that if you've become ordained and you become a Satanist

812
00:49:51.559 --> 00:49:53.679
<v Speaker 5>that day, you still have Apostolic succession.

813
00:49:55.880 --> 00:49:58.239
<v Speaker 11>Hey, Jay, I haven't even asked my question, and you

814
00:49:58.320 --> 00:49:59.519
<v Speaker 11>guys are I.

815
00:49:59.480 --> 00:50:02.559
<v Speaker 5>Mean, what you said, you're you already said something that's

816
00:50:02.639 --> 00:50:04.880
<v Speaker 5>simply not true and assumes your position. So I'm not

817
00:50:04.880 --> 00:50:06.800
<v Speaker 5>sure to be mean to you. I'm just pointing out that, like,

818
00:50:07.480 --> 00:50:11.000
<v Speaker 5>how do you you're assuming that Orthodox and Catholicism are

819
00:50:11.039 --> 00:50:13.679
<v Speaker 5>quote Apostolic churches and that's not our position.

820
00:50:13.920 --> 00:50:19.360
<v Speaker 11>So all right, fair enough, Jay my God coming out

821
00:50:19.400 --> 00:50:20.119
<v Speaker 11>firing with.

822
00:50:20.000 --> 00:50:20.639
<v Speaker 7>The with the.

823
00:50:22.119 --> 00:50:24.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, you're an inquisitor and it says it's a debate stream.

824
00:50:24.400 --> 00:50:29.280
<v Speaker 11>So I'm a lay inquisitor, not a professional one.

825
00:50:29.559 --> 00:50:30.039
<v Speaker 7>Well listen.

826
00:50:31.119 --> 00:50:34.400
<v Speaker 11>But the question that I had for you was, you know,

827
00:50:34.920 --> 00:50:37.519
<v Speaker 11>I mean going back to this question, which I think

828
00:50:37.519 --> 00:50:41.159
<v Speaker 11>you already kind of sabotaged the question. But in anyhows,

829
00:50:41.199 --> 00:50:44.639
<v Speaker 11>you know, but somebody, somebody looking for the truths, they're

830
00:50:44.679 --> 00:50:48.079
<v Speaker 11>going to land well hopefully they would land on it.

831
00:50:49.440 --> 00:50:51.559
<v Speaker 11>But the question that I had for you is is

832
00:50:51.599 --> 00:50:54.920
<v Speaker 11>your heritage east or west of Berlin? And if it's

833
00:50:54.960 --> 00:50:59.159
<v Speaker 11>west of Berlin, how did you land an Orthodoxy?

834
00:51:00.079 --> 00:51:02.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? This is it's such a mean I'm not I'm

835
00:51:02.400 --> 00:51:03.519
<v Speaker 5>not trying to be mean to you. It's just so

836
00:51:03.559 --> 00:51:06.039
<v Speaker 5>many Roman Catholics think this way. I literally have I

837
00:51:06.079 --> 00:51:09.440
<v Speaker 5>do not understand this thought process. How does the historical

838
00:51:09.519 --> 00:51:13.400
<v Speaker 5>geopolitical settings of the Cold War or the Byzantine Empire.

839
00:51:13.400 --> 00:51:15.119
<v Speaker 5>How does that have anything to do with which position

840
00:51:15.239 --> 00:51:15.639
<v Speaker 5>is true?

841
00:51:20.400 --> 00:51:20.639
<v Speaker 7>A J.

842
00:51:21.000 --> 00:51:22.800
<v Speaker 11>I'm not sure if you're looking for a rebuttal, but

843
00:51:22.880 --> 00:51:26.079
<v Speaker 11>I'm just trying to hear you out, just because I figured,

844
00:51:26.119 --> 00:51:27.719
<v Speaker 11>you know people, you know men.

845
00:51:27.920 --> 00:51:28.639
<v Speaker 4>I can understand.

846
00:51:28.639 --> 00:51:30.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's like you guys almost always think the

847
00:51:30.880 --> 00:51:33.599
<v Speaker 5>religion is your heritage. It makes no that makes no sense,

848
00:51:33.760 --> 00:51:35.880
<v Speaker 5>like that's nothing to do with whether it's true or false.

849
00:51:36.760 --> 00:51:40.280
<v Speaker 7>No, we think it's universal. We think it's universal.

850
00:51:40.400 --> 00:51:43.119
<v Speaker 5>But you just literally argued that why did I end

851
00:51:43.199 --> 00:51:46.800
<v Speaker 5>up Orthodox if it's not my uh geopolitical heritage.

852
00:51:48.639 --> 00:51:52.960
<v Speaker 11>Well, the thing is that I could understand somebody being Eastern.

853
00:51:52.559 --> 00:51:55.679
<v Speaker 12>European, uh, you know, going back to.

854
00:51:57.239 --> 00:52:00.119
<v Speaker 11>Orthodoxy, because you know, they kind of trace back and

855
00:52:00.159 --> 00:52:03.880
<v Speaker 11>that's where they land. But I wasn't sure.

856
00:52:03.679 --> 00:52:04.079
<v Speaker 9>If you were.

857
00:52:06.039 --> 00:52:07.719
<v Speaker 5>You want to know the real answer. Their answer is

858
00:52:07.719 --> 00:52:15.239
<v Speaker 5>because I'm an Eastern European KGB sorcerer. That's why I

859
00:52:15.280 --> 00:52:18.159
<v Speaker 5>worked for the KGB. Everybody thought we went away, but

860
00:52:18.760 --> 00:52:23.360
<v Speaker 5>actually redeem Zuomer is correct. Putin is the one that's

861
00:52:23.559 --> 00:52:26.360
<v Speaker 5>running a giant syop that Orthodox that people are converty

862
00:52:26.480 --> 00:52:28.119
<v Speaker 5>Orthodoxy in the West, and I'm the head of it.

863
00:52:29.639 --> 00:52:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'll say this much. Putin is probably.

864
00:52:35.480 --> 00:52:37.599
<v Speaker 11>I mean, yeah, I'm gonna go ahead and say it.

865
00:52:37.639 --> 00:52:41.039
<v Speaker 11>I think Putin is probably the most sound and based

866
00:52:41.199 --> 00:52:46.079
<v Speaker 11>had a state, even though he's not ours, speaking for

867
00:52:46.159 --> 00:52:50.559
<v Speaker 11>those of us in the US, kind of like some other.

868
00:52:50.599 --> 00:52:53.960
<v Speaker 7>Uncle might have been in the early thirties.

869
00:52:55.480 --> 00:52:57.039
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I have a question for you. I have a

870
00:52:57.119 --> 00:53:00.320
<v Speaker 5>question for you. Do you think that, let's say, winning

871
00:53:00.320 --> 00:53:03.440
<v Speaker 5>a giant battle, does that make Catholicism true in your mind?

872
00:53:05.320 --> 00:53:06.360
<v Speaker 7>No? No, no, no.

873
00:53:06.440 --> 00:53:10.400
<v Speaker 11>I think the truth is the truth, regardless of one.

874
00:53:10.280 --> 00:53:11.320
<v Speaker 9>True lost battle.

875
00:53:11.519 --> 00:53:13.599
<v Speaker 5>Does that have an in truth?

876
00:53:15.800 --> 00:53:17.119
<v Speaker 9>Are you making fun of my accent?

877
00:53:18.079 --> 00:53:19.679
<v Speaker 5>I didn't know you had an accent? Are you saying

878
00:53:19.719 --> 00:53:20.440
<v Speaker 5>you had an accent?

879
00:53:22.199 --> 00:53:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Well?

880
00:53:22.400 --> 00:53:23.320
<v Speaker 7>You know I'm Spanish?

881
00:53:23.400 --> 00:53:25.880
<v Speaker 9>What do you want waiting on from your man?

882
00:53:26.000 --> 00:53:26.559
<v Speaker 14>Come on, man?

883
00:53:27.440 --> 00:53:31.920
<v Speaker 5>You called yourself inquisitor. I don't know you. Could you

884
00:53:32.000 --> 00:53:35.360
<v Speaker 5>call me? You call me an Eastern European? You call

885
00:53:35.440 --> 00:53:36.559
<v Speaker 5>me an Eastern European.

886
00:53:37.840 --> 00:53:41.039
<v Speaker 7>I didn't. I was wondering if you were, because.

887
00:53:40.800 --> 00:53:45.079
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if you're like, can't you tell I'm a Serb?

888
00:53:45.199 --> 00:53:51.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm Serbian? There you go all right, thank you. I'm

889
00:53:51.800 --> 00:53:54.280
<v Speaker 5>just joking.

890
00:53:53.239 --> 00:53:56.440
<v Speaker 7>Western European countries. Uh, many of them were Orthodox.

891
00:53:59.760 --> 00:54:02.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, that was what he was saying. He's like, I

892
00:54:02.320 --> 00:54:03.800
<v Speaker 5>don't know, I don't know what that guy was saying.

893
00:54:03.800 --> 00:54:16.000
<v Speaker 5>That trying me mean to him. But Eli, what's up, dude? Eli?

894
00:54:16.119 --> 00:54:16.480
<v Speaker 5>What's up?

895
00:54:16.519 --> 00:54:16.639
<v Speaker 9>Man?

896
00:54:16.639 --> 00:54:19.199
<v Speaker 5>Don't sit on any don't sit on any walls up high.

897
00:54:19.239 --> 00:54:20.000
<v Speaker 5>You might fall over.

898
00:54:21.679 --> 00:54:22.920
<v Speaker 7>Hey man, can you hear me?

899
00:54:24.480 --> 00:54:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

900
00:54:24.840 --> 00:54:26.320
<v Speaker 7>Great? Great? First of all, I just want to say

901
00:54:26.320 --> 00:54:28.400
<v Speaker 7>thank you for your hard work. Man. I listened to

902
00:54:28.440 --> 00:54:30.519
<v Speaker 7>you as as much as I can. If you're doing

903
00:54:30.559 --> 00:54:31.119
<v Speaker 7>the large work.

904
00:54:31.159 --> 00:54:31.400
<v Speaker 15>Brothers.

905
00:54:33.199 --> 00:54:35.480
<v Speaker 14>I just wanted to know what I should look for

906
00:54:36.280 --> 00:54:39.840
<v Speaker 14>when choosing an Orthodox church because I'm going.

907
00:54:39.639 --> 00:54:42.960
<v Speaker 7>To make UH. I want to cover from being a.

908
00:54:42.920 --> 00:54:48.320
<v Speaker 10>Protestant to Orthodoxy because of you and Andrew Wilson's So.

909
00:54:47.480 --> 00:54:50.679
<v Speaker 5>I would say, you know, uh, try to find UH.

910
00:54:51.320 --> 00:54:53.320
<v Speaker 5>I would visit all the Orthodox churches around you. I

911
00:54:53.360 --> 00:54:56.239
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't immediately worry so much about what jurisdiction is.

912
00:54:56.480 --> 00:54:56.599
<v Speaker 2>UH.

913
00:54:56.760 --> 00:55:01.400
<v Speaker 5>See which one you detect tis the most uh conservative

914
00:55:01.440 --> 00:55:05.039
<v Speaker 5>types of views, the priest that's the best you know

915
00:55:05.760 --> 00:55:09.199
<v Speaker 5>person for you personally, and make the decision in that way.

916
00:55:09.239 --> 00:55:11.360
<v Speaker 5>I wouldn't worry too much about the other subjects, but

917
00:55:11.480 --> 00:55:16.320
<v Speaker 5>definitely just check out what's around you. Franken Nader, Uh,

918
00:55:16.360 --> 00:55:20.639
<v Speaker 5>we got a rebellious bastard atheist. He's gonna set us straight.

919
00:55:20.719 --> 00:55:27.559
<v Speaker 8>Uh.

920
00:55:27.639 --> 00:55:30.679
<v Speaker 5>I got an apparently, I got an honorary serb title

921
00:55:30.719 --> 00:55:35.320
<v Speaker 5>from some of the people in the chat. Serbs love me, dude. Well,

922
00:55:35.480 --> 00:55:39.199
<v Speaker 5>serbs are always like reaching out. Have some kind of

923
00:55:39.199 --> 00:55:40.800
<v Speaker 5>serb kindred. I don't know what's going on?

924
00:55:41.480 --> 00:55:42.119
<v Speaker 8>What's up? Man?

925
00:55:43.239 --> 00:55:53.159
<v Speaker 5>Got on you? What's up?

926
00:55:55.400 --> 00:55:55.760
<v Speaker 9>Okay?

927
00:55:56.840 --> 00:55:59.960
<v Speaker 7>So that is anthidats he owns the.

928
00:56:00.760 --> 00:56:02.880
<v Speaker 5>You call me from a toll booth. You call me

929
00:56:02.880 --> 00:56:07.440
<v Speaker 5>from a phone booth. No, no, it sounds like a

930
00:56:07.480 --> 00:56:08.000
<v Speaker 5>phone booth.

931
00:56:08.039 --> 00:56:08.280
<v Speaker 9>Man.

932
00:56:09.639 --> 00:56:10.079
<v Speaker 7>I'm sorry.

933
00:56:10.119 --> 00:56:11.079
<v Speaker 9>If it doesn't sound.

934
00:56:10.880 --> 00:56:12.679
<v Speaker 5>Good, you call him fro nineteen eighty seven on the

935
00:56:12.679 --> 00:56:13.800
<v Speaker 5>phone booth. Go ahead.

936
00:56:16.280 --> 00:56:18.320
<v Speaker 4>My question is orthodoxy?

937
00:56:18.440 --> 00:56:20.960
<v Speaker 12>I told thee of scripture? Is that correct?

938
00:56:21.719 --> 00:56:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

939
00:56:22.679 --> 00:56:27.039
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Not maybe basically yeah, but not in like the

940
00:56:27.159 --> 00:56:28.880
<v Speaker 5>kjav only type of mindset.

941
00:56:29.920 --> 00:56:31.719
<v Speaker 14>Well, just honest questions.

942
00:56:31.840 --> 00:56:34.559
<v Speaker 16>How do you reconcile the factual?

943
00:56:34.679 --> 00:56:36.039
<v Speaker 12>Inerrants he's a scripture?

944
00:56:37.199 --> 00:56:38.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, there are so.

945
00:56:39.360 --> 00:56:44.760
<v Speaker 16>Diverges from known fact, right, like, for instance, the flood

946
00:56:44.800 --> 00:56:46.159
<v Speaker 16>that never happened.

947
00:56:46.000 --> 00:56:47.719
<v Speaker 5>Or hold on, how do you know there was no

948
00:56:47.840 --> 00:56:51.079
<v Speaker 5>flood when ancient writing Let's say this.

949
00:56:51.400 --> 00:56:55.360
<v Speaker 7>Hold on, let's say this science says it didn't happen.

950
00:56:55.880 --> 00:56:57.960
<v Speaker 5>How do you know that science is correct? As if

951
00:56:58.000 --> 00:57:01.000
<v Speaker 5>science is one entity that speaks with one authoritative voice.

952
00:57:01.000 --> 00:57:02.320
<v Speaker 5>So you have an assumption that you can.

953
00:57:02.480 --> 00:57:05.239
<v Speaker 7>Justify verifiable data, right.

954
00:57:05.800 --> 00:57:07.880
<v Speaker 5>How do you what does that even mean? To verify?

955
00:57:08.039 --> 00:57:11.000
<v Speaker 5>How do you know that it's verified? Have you actually verified?

956
00:57:11.000 --> 00:57:12.519
<v Speaker 5>Are you trusting the quote science?

957
00:57:12.559 --> 00:57:12.719
<v Speaker 9>Man?

958
00:57:16.039 --> 00:57:18.079
<v Speaker 17>I guess you have to do the best you can

959
00:57:18.199 --> 00:57:21.480
<v Speaker 17>to understand the size and make your own conclusion.

960
00:57:21.519 --> 00:57:23.880
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so we all got to get PhDs and engineering

961
00:57:23.880 --> 00:57:28.079
<v Speaker 5>degrees in every field to know absolutely not.

962
00:57:28.159 --> 00:57:29.440
<v Speaker 4>You don't have to have a PhD.

963
00:57:30.039 --> 00:57:34.480
<v Speaker 5>Oh, so you rely on experts. So you rely on experts,

964
00:57:34.960 --> 00:57:37.360
<v Speaker 5>of course. Okay, so how do you know which experts

965
00:57:37.360 --> 00:57:37.880
<v Speaker 5>are right.

966
00:57:40.840 --> 00:57:42.760
<v Speaker 7>The ones that can be verified?

967
00:57:42.880 --> 00:57:43.039
<v Speaker 2>Right?

968
00:57:43.199 --> 00:57:47.000
<v Speaker 5>So, well, but you said that we follow the experts.

969
00:57:47.280 --> 00:57:50.119
<v Speaker 5>That's just you just made a circular argument, So we

970
00:57:50.199 --> 00:57:51.880
<v Speaker 5>follow the experts.

971
00:57:52.360 --> 00:57:57.639
<v Speaker 12>Here's what I'm asking. I'm asking if you are basing

972
00:57:58.239 --> 00:58:02.039
<v Speaker 12>your belief in street sure solely on scripture?

973
00:58:02.639 --> 00:58:05.639
<v Speaker 5>No, I'm not. I believe that there's logical arguments that

974
00:58:06.119 --> 00:58:09.719
<v Speaker 5>are prior to science, that I base it on prior.

975
00:58:10.239 --> 00:58:13.840
<v Speaker 18>Okay, that's my only question.

976
00:58:15.480 --> 00:58:16.159
<v Speaker 7>I have a question.

977
00:58:16.239 --> 00:58:17.360
<v Speaker 9>A good thing good.

978
00:58:17.519 --> 00:58:18.840
<v Speaker 12>There's a lot that don't.

979
00:58:20.239 --> 00:58:20.719
<v Speaker 2>Do you?

980
00:58:20.719 --> 00:58:23.760
<v Speaker 10>You do know that science can't even from science, get

981
00:58:24.199 --> 00:58:26.199
<v Speaker 10>to any knowledge claims.

982
00:58:27.760 --> 00:58:31.599
<v Speaker 5>How do you figure how does science verify the scientific method?

983
00:58:33.840 --> 00:58:38.280
<v Speaker 5>Because it works, so anything that works as so anything

984
00:58:38.320 --> 00:58:40.320
<v Speaker 5>that works. So here we go. So this is a

985
00:58:40.360 --> 00:58:42.840
<v Speaker 5>people have no idea what they're talking about. It's not

986
00:58:42.880 --> 00:58:48.639
<v Speaker 5>even worth talking to this guy. It's a waste of time, right, clan,

987
00:58:48.679 --> 00:58:54.159
<v Speaker 5>see what's up? That's not going to go anywhere. Welcome everybody.

988
00:58:54.199 --> 00:58:58.639
<v Speaker 5>We're having open for him.

989
00:58:58.679 --> 00:58:59.519
<v Speaker 7>Hellocan guys here.

990
00:59:00.960 --> 00:59:03.440
<v Speaker 5>Tom Clinton, So what's up?

991
00:59:04.119 --> 00:59:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Tom Clancy?

992
00:59:05.039 --> 00:59:07.480
<v Speaker 14>So I'm new to orthodoxy, so give me some grace

993
00:59:07.519 --> 00:59:08.840
<v Speaker 14>that this is a bit of a basic question.

994
00:59:10.239 --> 00:59:14.440
<v Speaker 7>But I have heard you use curse words before, and

995
00:59:14.559 --> 00:59:16.599
<v Speaker 7>so doesn't the Bible tell us to stay.

996
00:59:16.400 --> 00:59:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Away from fillow language and profanity.

997
00:59:18.360 --> 00:59:20.039
<v Speaker 5>Yes, and that's why you should not listen to me,

998
00:59:20.159 --> 00:59:24.480
<v Speaker 5>and you should go find the pious men that you support. Steven,

999
00:59:24.559 --> 00:59:32.159
<v Speaker 5>what's up? I'm gonna say a curse worrid poop. Oh,

1000
00:59:32.199 --> 00:59:37.719
<v Speaker 5>I just did it. I just just got wrecked? What's

1001
00:59:37.800 --> 00:59:41.760
<v Speaker 5>up by? Like, where in the Bible are there quote

1002
00:59:41.840 --> 00:59:45.119
<v Speaker 5>curse words they might know? Can you show me the

1003
00:59:45.239 --> 00:59:47.280
<v Speaker 5>verse where there's curse words? Did you know that in

1004
00:59:47.320 --> 00:59:49.599
<v Speaker 5>the King James Bible it says that people piss it

1005
00:59:49.719 --> 00:59:53.480
<v Speaker 5>against a wall? So I'm confused. Is that a curse

1006
00:59:53.519 --> 00:59:56.679
<v Speaker 5>word or what? What is it about the letters s

1007
00:59:56.840 --> 01:00:00.239
<v Speaker 5>h I T that are evil letters? Versus is the

1008
01:00:00.320 --> 01:00:05.400
<v Speaker 5>letters pop which are acceptable letters? Go ahead? Stuff on?

1009
01:00:05.480 --> 01:00:05.880
<v Speaker 5>What's up?

1010
01:00:05.920 --> 01:00:06.079
<v Speaker 6>Man?

1011
01:00:11.280 --> 01:00:12.480
<v Speaker 5>You have to unmute.

1012
01:00:14.199 --> 01:00:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Hi?

1013
01:00:14.480 --> 01:00:15.119
<v Speaker 11>Can you hear me now?

1014
01:00:15.239 --> 01:00:15.360
<v Speaker 9>Yes?

1015
01:00:15.400 --> 01:00:17.480
<v Speaker 12>Sir oh hi, sir h.

1016
01:00:17.599 --> 01:00:19.760
<v Speaker 19>I'm gonna listen to some debates, and it seems like

1017
01:00:20.159 --> 01:00:23.280
<v Speaker 19>a lot of Christians kind of agree on the same things,

1018
01:00:23.280 --> 01:00:26.760
<v Speaker 19>but they may disagree on specifics, like I guess with

1019
01:00:26.840 --> 01:00:29.639
<v Speaker 19>the Orthodoxy when it comes to the Holy Ghost. Now

1020
01:00:29.679 --> 01:00:31.880
<v Speaker 19>my question is it's not exactly about the Holy Ghost,

1021
01:00:31.960 --> 01:00:35.079
<v Speaker 19>but it seems like these debates is like, well, scripture

1022
01:00:35.079 --> 01:00:38.880
<v Speaker 19>says this, and they reconfirmed the scripture with scripture and scripture.

1023
01:00:39.519 --> 01:00:44.079
<v Speaker 19>So I'm kind of curious, like do all verses carry

1024
01:00:44.119 --> 01:00:48.840
<v Speaker 19>the same weight. So let's say, for instance, well, the

1025
01:00:48.880 --> 01:00:51.719
<v Speaker 19>Holy Ghost says this thing and it's backed up, and

1026
01:00:51.760 --> 01:00:54.000
<v Speaker 19>the orthodox will back it up with five scriptures, but

1027
01:00:54.000 --> 01:00:56.480
<v Speaker 19>that the Catholics will say, the Holy Ghost says this,

1028
01:00:56.599 --> 01:00:58.400
<v Speaker 19>but it's backed up with four scriptures.

1029
01:00:59.199 --> 01:01:01.119
<v Speaker 5>Like I mean, it has nothing to do with the

1030
01:01:01.199 --> 01:01:02.960
<v Speaker 5>number of verses or this or that. It has to

1031
01:01:03.039 --> 01:01:05.559
<v Speaker 5>do with the interpretation of the verses. So the verses

1032
01:01:05.599 --> 01:01:08.800
<v Speaker 5>don't like self interpret or self authenticate. You have to

1033
01:01:08.800 --> 01:01:11.800
<v Speaker 5>interpret the verses. So you're talking about a question of

1034
01:01:11.840 --> 01:01:14.480
<v Speaker 5>like piling up numbers of verses and the fact that

1035
01:01:14.840 --> 01:01:17.360
<v Speaker 5>Orthodox disagree with Catholics, Like, none of that has anything

1036
01:01:17.400 --> 01:01:20.360
<v Speaker 5>to do with which positions true or false. So that's

1037
01:01:20.559 --> 01:01:22.039
<v Speaker 5>really I'm not trying to be mean to you. I'm

1038
01:01:22.039 --> 01:01:24.559
<v Speaker 5>just saying that has nothing to do with which positions right,

1039
01:01:24.800 --> 01:01:27.360
<v Speaker 5>who's got more quotes or using more quotes or.

1040
01:01:27.320 --> 01:01:31.079
<v Speaker 19>Whatever, Because it seems like when these debates happen, they're like, well,

1041
01:01:31.239 --> 01:01:32.880
<v Speaker 19>we got all these scriptures to back up.

1042
01:01:32.760 --> 01:01:34.840
<v Speaker 12>What I'm saying, and then I got all these scriptures

1043
01:01:34.880 --> 01:01:35.239
<v Speaker 12>back up.

1044
01:01:35.199 --> 01:01:35.679
<v Speaker 7>What I'm saying.

1045
01:01:35.760 --> 01:01:37.519
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but that has nothing to do with which positions

1046
01:01:37.519 --> 01:01:38.079
<v Speaker 5>to or false?

1047
01:01:38.159 --> 01:01:40.840
<v Speaker 12>So what Well, I was kind of curious.

1048
01:01:40.840 --> 01:01:43.639
<v Speaker 19>So let's say, for instance, like Jesus says something right,

1049
01:01:44.239 --> 01:01:47.239
<v Speaker 19>but then someone would say, well, Paul and Peter and

1050
01:01:47.320 --> 01:01:50.679
<v Speaker 19>Timothy said this, that kind of contradicts what Jesus says.

1051
01:01:50.880 --> 01:01:53.480
<v Speaker 19>So whose verse or whose word has the most weight

1052
01:01:53.519 --> 01:01:57.280
<v Speaker 19>would be Jesus or three other authors.

1053
01:01:57.440 --> 01:02:00.880
<v Speaker 5>We don't think there's any contradictions between Jesus and his apostle.

1054
01:02:01.000 --> 01:02:03.800
<v Speaker 5>We think that Jesus inspired and taught his apostles what

1055
01:02:03.880 --> 01:02:06.679
<v Speaker 5>to teach and providentially guided them to not teach error.

1056
01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:10.159
<v Speaker 5>So there's no contradiction between Jesus and Paul or whatever.

1057
01:02:10.800 --> 01:02:13.719
<v Speaker 19>I mustn't necessarily saying contradictions, but maybe a little difference.

1058
01:02:13.920 --> 01:02:15.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, I would say, I would say that in the

1059
01:02:15.400 --> 01:02:18.519
<v Speaker 5>Orthodox position, we do take the Gospels to have a

1060
01:02:18.639 --> 01:02:21.960
<v Speaker 5>higher status and honor in the liturgy, but that doesn't

1061
01:02:22.000 --> 01:02:24.239
<v Speaker 5>mean that they're like different than the teaching of Paul.

1062
01:02:24.960 --> 01:02:27.840
<v Speaker 19>Okay, okay, Yeah, So I saw this debate with Trent

1063
01:02:27.920 --> 01:02:30.400
<v Speaker 19>horn In, a Protestant about once say it and always say,

1064
01:02:30.480 --> 01:02:32.360
<v Speaker 19>then they're going to do a scripture, and it's like,

1065
01:02:32.400 --> 01:02:35.840
<v Speaker 19>you know, I see so much people pine on scripture

1066
01:02:35.840 --> 01:02:37.679
<v Speaker 19>on top of each other and stuff, and I just like,

1067
01:02:37.880 --> 01:02:39.920
<v Speaker 19>I agree with you, and that's probably where the church

1068
01:02:39.960 --> 01:02:40.360
<v Speaker 19>comes in.

1069
01:02:40.559 --> 01:02:42.239
<v Speaker 5>Well, yeah, I would agree, I would agree with you

1070
01:02:42.320 --> 01:02:45.400
<v Speaker 5>that you can't like, a lot of times these disputes

1071
01:02:45.639 --> 01:02:48.760
<v Speaker 5>are not going to be solved in an evidentialist stack

1072
01:02:48.840 --> 01:02:52.079
<v Speaker 5>them up manner. But Trent Horn is an evidentialist, and

1073
01:02:52.119 --> 01:02:54.079
<v Speaker 5>so he thinks that you just stack up one two

1074
01:02:54.079 --> 01:02:57.400
<v Speaker 5>evidences and then people will just look at the evidences

1075
01:02:57.400 --> 01:02:59.400
<v Speaker 5>and they'll just choose because we're all honest and we're

1076
01:02:59.400 --> 01:03:01.559
<v Speaker 5>all neutral. When I don't think that that's true at all.

1077
01:03:01.599 --> 01:03:02.440
<v Speaker 5>None of that's true.

1078
01:03:02.800 --> 01:03:04.599
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So that's that's been my big struggle.

1079
01:03:04.639 --> 01:03:07.519
<v Speaker 19>I'm pretty much agnostic, and I've listened to you guys,

1080
01:03:07.559 --> 01:03:11.079
<v Speaker 19>and you guys like totally crushed the choice of becoming

1081
01:03:11.079 --> 01:03:14.079
<v Speaker 19>a Muslim or Jehovah witnesses or Mormon.

1082
01:03:14.360 --> 01:03:16.639
<v Speaker 12>You guys definitely pointed me towards the trinity.

1083
01:03:16.400 --> 01:03:18.840
<v Speaker 5>So well, we crushed the Roman position too.

1084
01:03:20.400 --> 01:03:22.519
<v Speaker 12>Well, I see that too, But I'm going back. I'm

1085
01:03:22.519 --> 01:03:24.119
<v Speaker 12>trying to do my due diligence on the homework.

1086
01:03:24.159 --> 01:03:26.679
<v Speaker 19>And that's why I was thinking, like, well, we got

1087
01:03:26.719 --> 01:03:34.360
<v Speaker 19>these two Christians, you know, having a differential opinion on specifics,

1088
01:03:33.840 --> 01:03:36.199
<v Speaker 19>and I was kind of wondering, well, what does term is?

1089
01:03:36.239 --> 01:03:36.960
<v Speaker 12>What's more specific?

1090
01:03:37.000 --> 01:03:39.360
<v Speaker 19>Pilon on scripture on top of each other, or see

1091
01:03:39.400 --> 01:03:43.679
<v Speaker 19>who which author or Jesus as a word has more

1092
01:03:43.719 --> 01:03:46.000
<v Speaker 19>weight to when they speak. Now, I see what you're

1093
01:03:46.039 --> 01:03:49.079
<v Speaker 19>saying that what Jesus and the apostles are on.

1094
01:03:49.000 --> 01:03:52.000
<v Speaker 12>The same page, So I'm just kind of curious.

1095
01:03:52.079 --> 01:03:54.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, I don't think I actually I understand your question.

1096
01:03:54.320 --> 01:03:56.320
<v Speaker 5>I just don't think either of those things is really

1097
01:03:56.360 --> 01:03:59.280
<v Speaker 5>going to be the solution, because, you know, if it's

1098
01:03:59.360 --> 01:04:02.199
<v Speaker 5>like a debate between an Orthodox and a Roman Catholic,

1099
01:04:02.320 --> 01:04:06.800
<v Speaker 5>usually those debates involve so much history, so much you know,

1100
01:04:06.840 --> 01:04:10.719
<v Speaker 5>biblical material, that they're not going to solve it or

1101
01:04:11.079 --> 01:04:16.320
<v Speaker 5>convince people typically unless they're really low tier lo tier voters,

1102
01:04:17.119 --> 01:04:20.280
<v Speaker 5>low information voters. They're only going to convince those people

1103
01:04:20.639 --> 01:04:22.719
<v Speaker 5>with really low tiers because usually it's going to take

1104
01:04:22.840 --> 01:04:25.079
<v Speaker 5>like knowing all the Bible and knowing a lot of

1105
01:04:25.079 --> 01:04:28.519
<v Speaker 5>the Church fathers. And so that's the difficult part is

1106
01:04:28.559 --> 01:04:31.800
<v Speaker 5>the learning curve that's involved, and most of the time

1107
01:04:31.800 --> 01:04:35.519
<v Speaker 5>people are just kind of approaching these hotly contested issues

1108
01:04:35.559 --> 01:04:38.239
<v Speaker 5>with little to no knowledge at all, and so they

1109
01:04:38.280 --> 01:04:42.440
<v Speaker 5>just oftentimes fall for unfortunately very bad arguments. And what

1110
01:04:42.480 --> 01:04:45.679
<v Speaker 5>you're talking about stack whoever quotes stacks the most proofs,

1111
01:04:46.159 --> 01:04:49.400
<v Speaker 5>but the proofs are only as good as the accuracy

1112
01:04:49.440 --> 01:04:51.679
<v Speaker 5>of the interpretation. I mean, I could stack up a

1113
01:04:51.719 --> 01:04:54.920
<v Speaker 5>bunch of proofs from Muslim and Job's witness websites to

1114
01:04:54.960 --> 01:04:58.199
<v Speaker 5>give the impression that Jesus is subordinate to the Father

1115
01:04:58.320 --> 01:05:02.000
<v Speaker 5>and a creature, but you would quickly find out, as

1116
01:05:02.079 --> 01:05:06.440
<v Speaker 5>if you investigated that, that those texts are misinterpreted and

1117
01:05:06.519 --> 01:05:08.760
<v Speaker 5>not in harmony with all the other texts that talk

1118
01:05:08.800 --> 01:05:11.360
<v Speaker 5>about not just the distinction between the father and son,

1119
01:05:11.400 --> 01:05:13.159
<v Speaker 5>but also the equality between the father and sons. It's

1120
01:05:13.199 --> 01:05:16.840
<v Speaker 5>a both and but a lot of heresies. You're actually

1121
01:05:16.840 --> 01:05:21.679
<v Speaker 5>correct rely on actually picking one verse, and that's the

1122
01:05:21.760 --> 01:05:25.159
<v Speaker 5>lynchpin of everything. Every other verse in scripture hangs on

1123
01:05:26.079 --> 01:05:31.360
<v Speaker 5>their interpretation of you know, classic example, Jesus says, you know,

1124
01:05:31.679 --> 01:05:33.639
<v Speaker 5>no one is good but God, the Father. You know,

1125
01:05:33.679 --> 01:05:35.679
<v Speaker 5>there's one God, the Father, et cetera. So that mess

1126
01:05:35.760 --> 01:05:38.880
<v Speaker 5>must mean therefore that Jesus isn't divine, and that's just

1127
01:05:38.880 --> 01:05:42.639
<v Speaker 5>simply not true. Ten full hat, what's up?

1128
01:05:42.719 --> 01:05:42.920
<v Speaker 7>Man?

1129
01:05:52.039 --> 01:05:56.320
<v Speaker 5>You got it? I'm mute. Thank you guys for the

1130
01:05:56.320 --> 01:06:00.079
<v Speaker 5>super chests. Appreciate that you gotta. I'm mute, man, Frank,

1131
01:06:00.559 --> 01:06:03.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean Fred, excuse me, fred X instead of fed

1132
01:06:03.519 --> 01:06:10.800
<v Speaker 5>X that Fred, do you want to talk?

1133
01:06:11.360 --> 01:06:11.719
<v Speaker 7>All right?

1134
01:06:11.840 --> 01:06:12.760
<v Speaker 5>Fred doesn't want to talk?

1135
01:06:13.079 --> 01:06:13.440
<v Speaker 13>Hello?

1136
01:06:13.480 --> 01:06:14.519
<v Speaker 5>Hello, Yeah, what's up?

1137
01:06:15.400 --> 01:06:15.880
<v Speaker 9>Hey? Hey?

1138
01:06:15.880 --> 01:06:19.480
<v Speaker 20>You don I was just wondering, do you think Orthodoxy

1139
01:06:19.639 --> 01:06:23.079
<v Speaker 20>is Catholicism for hipsters?

1140
01:06:24.519 --> 01:06:26.679
<v Speaker 5>I mean, was it Catholicism for hipsters in the first

1141
01:06:26.719 --> 01:06:27.880
<v Speaker 5>thousand years of Christianity?

1142
01:06:30.039 --> 01:06:33.239
<v Speaker 20>I don't have And also, do you think the drones

1143
01:06:33.280 --> 01:06:36.159
<v Speaker 20>are an attempt to start a cargo cult?

1144
01:06:36.760 --> 01:06:42.599
<v Speaker 5>Start of what cargo cult? A cargo cult? That's funny. Yeah,

1145
01:06:42.760 --> 01:06:53.079
<v Speaker 5>that was a good one. Fada. By the way, we

1146
01:06:53.159 --> 01:06:56.440
<v Speaker 5>got twelve hundred people and three hundred likes. Y'all don't

1147
01:06:56.480 --> 01:06:58.079
<v Speaker 5>like this dream? If you like this dream, why don't

1148
01:06:58.119 --> 01:07:01.719
<v Speaker 5>you like it? I don't understand what what we got?

1149
01:07:01.840 --> 01:07:04.280
<v Speaker 5>Is it all three hundred likers and seven eight hundred

1150
01:07:04.280 --> 01:07:07.280
<v Speaker 5>and twelve hundred haters? What's going on? Fata? What's up?

1151
01:07:07.800 --> 01:07:09.079
<v Speaker 5>I'm you? Why are you raising your hand?

1152
01:07:10.320 --> 01:07:10.599
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

1153
01:07:10.679 --> 01:07:14.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, yeah, I'm raising my hand because I'm European, I'm Greek,

1154
01:07:14.960 --> 01:07:21.440
<v Speaker 4>so I tried to be polite. I've been in some spaces, well,

1155
01:07:21.559 --> 01:07:27.320
<v Speaker 4>entering the space Jay. However, I asked in the bubble

1156
01:07:27.440 --> 01:07:30.960
<v Speaker 4>or whatever you call it, the chat, what's the debate

1157
01:07:31.000 --> 01:07:37.280
<v Speaker 4>about I see Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant, mostly Matheists versus Jay Dyer,

1158
01:07:37.559 --> 01:07:41.079
<v Speaker 4>and I asked, what's the debate about? Because I couldn't

1159
01:07:41.079 --> 01:07:46.920
<v Speaker 4>figure out. I'm here for fifteen minutes, now are against you?

1160
01:07:47.400 --> 01:07:52.079
<v Speaker 5>The topics that are listed are the topics of the

1161
01:07:52.199 --> 01:07:54.320
<v Speaker 5>churches and their theology and the religion.

1162
01:07:54.639 --> 01:07:59.880
<v Speaker 4>So yes, okay, all right? Then if I may introduce

1163
01:08:00.199 --> 01:08:05.599
<v Speaker 4>another religion of which I'm not part anymore as a church,

1164
01:08:06.599 --> 01:08:11.400
<v Speaker 4>but I'm part of it as a as a person

1165
01:08:11.480 --> 01:08:16.479
<v Speaker 4>who used common sense and show that uh, the observations

1166
01:08:16.520 --> 01:08:20.920
<v Speaker 4>not teachings exactly of that man. That man was Ellen Hubbard.

1167
01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:24.000
<v Speaker 4>You probably know him, and I have been into scientology,

1168
01:08:24.600 --> 01:08:25.760
<v Speaker 4>which is another religion.

1169
01:08:25.840 --> 01:08:29.000
<v Speaker 5>It's an interesting you're the Greek scientology guy. I've be

1170
01:08:29.079 --> 01:08:29.960
<v Speaker 5>called in here before.

1171
01:08:31.840 --> 01:08:35.119
<v Speaker 4>I don't remember if I was here with you before

1172
01:08:35.199 --> 01:08:36.479
<v Speaker 4>I had you as a follower.

1173
01:08:37.600 --> 01:08:39.479
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So why why would we believe a guy who

1174
01:08:39.479 --> 01:08:40.960
<v Speaker 5>comes out of Crowley's colt?

1175
01:08:42.399 --> 01:08:44.439
<v Speaker 4>So sorry, sorry, why would we believe.

1176
01:08:44.239 --> 01:08:46.520
<v Speaker 5>A guy who comes out of Alistair Crowley's cult?

1177
01:08:47.640 --> 01:08:52.920
<v Speaker 4>Because I think that the whole debate here is based

1178
01:08:53.119 --> 01:08:58.960
<v Speaker 4>on on remarks by people and not on actual data.

1179
01:08:59.399 --> 01:09:02.279
<v Speaker 4>Well that that you probably know.

1180
01:09:02.399 --> 01:09:04.840
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so is that is out that I also create

1181
01:09:04.960 --> 01:09:07.119
<v Speaker 5>a cult where it's a grad school to create your

1182
01:09:07.119 --> 01:09:08.279
<v Speaker 5>own cult? Is that true or false?

1183
01:09:10.039 --> 01:09:10.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

1184
01:09:10.319 --> 01:09:13.560
<v Speaker 4>That's totally false because what I know has nothing to

1185
01:09:13.600 --> 01:09:14.640
<v Speaker 4>do with that Crawley.

1186
01:09:14.880 --> 01:09:16.840
<v Speaker 5>But wait a minute, al Ron Hubbard went through the

1187
01:09:16.880 --> 01:09:18.920
<v Speaker 5>ranks of Crowley's cult and then start his cult. That's

1188
01:09:18.920 --> 01:09:21.520
<v Speaker 5>what I'm saying. Yeah, okay, so it has nothing to

1189
01:09:21.520 --> 01:09:24.279
<v Speaker 5>do with Crowley. I just okay, no.

1190
01:09:24.359 --> 01:09:28.760
<v Speaker 4>But but look, first of all, I just don't want

1191
01:09:28.760 --> 01:09:32.439
<v Speaker 4>to you know, either hijack or the space or whatever.

1192
01:09:32.800 --> 01:09:37.439
<v Speaker 4>I just wanted to mention that scientology is, indeed a

1193
01:09:37.600 --> 01:09:40.600
<v Speaker 4>very more promising religion though it has been.

1194
01:09:40.920 --> 01:09:42.199
<v Speaker 5>How do you know it's true.

1195
01:09:43.600 --> 01:09:46.359
<v Speaker 4>Because I've I've done it for thirty or more.

1196
01:09:46.479 --> 01:09:49.159
<v Speaker 5>Yes, you've done it is the proof that it's true.

1197
01:09:50.239 --> 01:09:53.399
<v Speaker 4>No, No, Look, if you if you want to discuss

1198
01:09:53.760 --> 01:10:00.439
<v Speaker 4>some in the chat topic, if you want to discuss sorry,

1199
01:10:00.479 --> 01:10:03.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm a foreign language speaker, so sometimes I miss some things.

1200
01:10:03.880 --> 01:10:06.039
<v Speaker 4>If you want to talk a little bit slower so

1201
01:10:06.119 --> 01:10:07.039
<v Speaker 4>I can fully do.

1202
01:10:07.239 --> 01:10:09.039
<v Speaker 5>How do you know that it's true? What's the argument

1203
01:10:09.079 --> 01:10:10.399
<v Speaker 5>for scientology being true?

1204
01:10:13.399 --> 01:10:17.239
<v Speaker 4>Funny, Well, it's like it's like I'm asking you, how

1205
01:10:17.319 --> 01:10:18.760
<v Speaker 4>do you know the Bible is true?

1206
01:10:19.119 --> 01:10:22.039
<v Speaker 5>I'm happy to answer that question. I'm happy to give

1207
01:10:22.039 --> 01:10:22.880
<v Speaker 5>an answer that question.

1208
01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:23.279
<v Speaker 9>Question.

1209
01:10:23.680 --> 01:10:26.039
<v Speaker 4>Huh, Well, tell me why? Why is the Bible truth?

1210
01:10:26.279 --> 01:10:27.760
<v Speaker 5>I'll go to that when we when we get the

1211
01:10:27.760 --> 01:10:30.199
<v Speaker 5>answer from you first, all.

1212
01:10:30.199 --> 01:10:33.880
<v Speaker 4>Right, it's not true. An answer to me, why is

1213
01:10:33.920 --> 01:10:34.680
<v Speaker 4>the Bible truth?

1214
01:10:34.720 --> 01:10:38.159
<v Speaker 5>Then I'm happy to address that issue, and I'm going

1215
01:10:38.239 --> 01:10:40.840
<v Speaker 5>to use the transcendental argument. But before we get to that,

1216
01:10:40.920 --> 01:10:42.640
<v Speaker 5>I want to know why scientology is.

1217
01:10:42.600 --> 01:10:46.760
<v Speaker 4>True because for me it has worked. It has worked.

1218
01:10:46.800 --> 01:10:48.760
<v Speaker 5>Do you think you think that's a good argument for

1219
01:10:48.800 --> 01:10:51.520
<v Speaker 5>something to be true? Because it's subjectively what works for you.

1220
01:10:51.560 --> 01:10:53.600
<v Speaker 5>I could say that about anything. I could. I could

1221
01:10:53.600 --> 01:10:56.520
<v Speaker 5>say I could say that the uh, I don't know,

1222
01:10:56.560 --> 01:10:59.159
<v Speaker 5>the motor oil that goes into my car works for me.

1223
01:10:59.239 --> 01:11:00.880
<v Speaker 5>So does that make it true you as a religion?

1224
01:11:02.399 --> 01:11:05.199
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think the metaphor is a little bit shallow.

1225
01:11:05.439 --> 01:11:09.359
<v Speaker 4>So let's let's get a little bit of realistic here, because.

1226
01:11:09.079 --> 01:11:11.079
<v Speaker 5>You well, it's a fallacy, is what I'm trying to say.

1227
01:11:11.199 --> 01:11:13.680
<v Speaker 5>It's a fallacy to say that because it quote works,

1228
01:11:13.680 --> 01:11:16.800
<v Speaker 5>that it's therefore true. Look, yes, I have.

1229
01:11:16.840 --> 01:11:19.640
<v Speaker 4>Done five TV shows on the Greek television.

1230
01:11:19.960 --> 01:11:21.840
<v Speaker 5>I don't care how many TVs like I give a

1231
01:11:21.880 --> 01:11:24.119
<v Speaker 5>ship about how many TV shows you do?

1232
01:11:24.840 --> 01:11:27.159
<v Speaker 4>Could you? Could you listen and not interrupting.

1233
01:11:27.239 --> 01:11:31.079
<v Speaker 5>It has nothing to do with your TV show productions,

1234
01:11:31.119 --> 01:11:32.840
<v Speaker 5>have nothing to do with weather scientology.

1235
01:11:33.840 --> 01:11:38.640
<v Speaker 4>The spaces remind me of the TV show Nobody Can Talk,

1236
01:11:39.079 --> 01:11:39.800
<v Speaker 4>Nobody Can make.

1237
01:11:44.079 --> 01:11:47.439
<v Speaker 5>This is just like crazy person gn what's up?

1238
01:11:51.760 --> 01:11:52.319
<v Speaker 7>Hello, Jack?

1239
01:11:54.279 --> 01:11:57.880
<v Speaker 21>Hey, I sent you some DMS regarding this interesting KI

1240
01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:02.199
<v Speaker 21>theology that people been creating on blockchain, and it's pretty

1241
01:12:02.239 --> 01:12:05.000
<v Speaker 21>heavily funded by a lot of prominent tech investors that

1242
01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:06.800
<v Speaker 21>are getting recent notoriety.

1243
01:12:06.359 --> 01:12:08.279
<v Speaker 7>Because of all the Trump election stuff.

1244
01:12:09.600 --> 01:12:10.560
<v Speaker 12>So I wanted to bring that up.

1245
01:12:10.640 --> 01:12:12.119
<v Speaker 9>But other than that, you check it out.

1246
01:12:12.680 --> 01:12:12.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1247
01:12:12.960 --> 01:12:16.560
<v Speaker 21>I have a fortunate of being baptized and raised Greek Orthodox,

1248
01:12:16.960 --> 01:12:20.159
<v Speaker 21>and so it's it's been interesting because I've I've always

1249
01:12:20.159 --> 01:12:22.359
<v Speaker 21>considered it to be the truth daith and I've never

1250
01:12:22.399 --> 01:12:24.479
<v Speaker 21>had to really argue against it. So it's interesting to

1251
01:12:24.520 --> 01:12:27.520
<v Speaker 21>hear the debates and the argument for it. So I

1252
01:12:27.560 --> 01:12:28.680
<v Speaker 21>will appreciate it.

1253
01:12:28.760 --> 01:12:31.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, thank you, appreciate your information there. I'll check it out.

1254
01:12:32.199 --> 01:12:38.359
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, thanks man, I'm.

1255
01:12:38.039 --> 01:12:45.920
<v Speaker 5>Blocking that boomer Rick. What's up? People that like like

1256
01:12:46.039 --> 01:12:48.399
<v Speaker 5>that like they just they'll just yap the entire time,

1257
01:12:48.479 --> 01:12:51.199
<v Speaker 5>they'll sap all the energy and the whole conversation, and

1258
01:12:51.199 --> 01:12:53.079
<v Speaker 5>that they'll never listen to what you're saying. They have

1259
01:12:53.119 --> 01:12:54.520
<v Speaker 5>no idea what a debate is. They don't know what

1260
01:12:54.560 --> 01:12:57.439
<v Speaker 5>policies are, they don't care. It's just yapping NonStop. What's up?

1261
01:12:57.520 --> 01:12:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Rick?

1262
01:13:00.720 --> 01:13:08.079
<v Speaker 5>I'm mute. I will give him credit. He's the first

1263
01:13:08.439 --> 01:13:11.640
<v Speaker 5>scientologist who's ever come to a space to quote debate,

1264
01:13:11.680 --> 01:13:15.720
<v Speaker 5>even though he didn't want a debate. I'm sorry people

1265
01:13:15.760 --> 01:13:18.479
<v Speaker 5>think that coming to a debate is preaching. What's up?

1266
01:13:18.560 --> 01:13:21.680
<v Speaker 7>Rick? Hey, how you doing well?

1267
01:13:21.800 --> 01:13:23.399
<v Speaker 9>I I was.

1268
01:13:23.720 --> 01:13:24.399
<v Speaker 7>The debate is.

1269
01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:30.520
<v Speaker 20>What Catholic, Orthodox, biasid Muslims and atheists are religions?

1270
01:13:30.760 --> 01:13:31.760
<v Speaker 7>Or which is the best?

1271
01:13:33.720 --> 01:13:35.760
<v Speaker 5>Can you turn your TV down over? I can't hear you, man?

1272
01:13:36.840 --> 01:13:40.880
<v Speaker 9>Oh sure, okay, sorry, okay, yeah.

1273
01:13:40.920 --> 01:13:43.560
<v Speaker 5>The debate. The debate is which of these is correct?

1274
01:13:43.640 --> 01:13:47.159
<v Speaker 5>And people from those positions debating each other. I'm Orthodox,

1275
01:13:47.199 --> 01:13:48.279
<v Speaker 5>so I defend that position.

1276
01:13:49.880 --> 01:13:52.920
<v Speaker 9>Oh okay, well, I got nothing arguing with you about us.

1277
01:13:53.920 --> 01:14:09.720
<v Speaker 18>Okay, right, thanks, Rick, appreciate it. Warren Warren, what's up man?

1278
01:14:10.640 --> 01:14:11.720
<v Speaker 5>Warren? G nay dog?

1279
01:14:11.840 --> 01:14:15.359
<v Speaker 2>War So I just wanted to ask you a question,

1280
01:14:16.479 --> 01:14:16.960
<v Speaker 2>paras time.

1281
01:14:17.760 --> 01:14:19.239
<v Speaker 5>What is the topic of the debate today?

1282
01:14:20.279 --> 01:14:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but they're really this topic.

1283
01:14:22.039 --> 01:14:24.479
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, thank you for coming with absolutely nothing wrong of

1284
01:14:24.520 --> 01:14:28.279
<v Speaker 5>my good job. Three d Anton, what's up? Go watch

1285
01:14:28.359 --> 01:14:29.479
<v Speaker 5>my videos on the subject.

1286
01:14:35.000 --> 01:14:41.000
<v Speaker 9>Hey, So I'm not particularly interested in a debate, but

1287
01:14:41.039 --> 01:14:43.800
<v Speaker 9>I I wanted to ask a question. I guess that

1288
01:14:43.960 --> 01:14:51.039
<v Speaker 9>just occurred to me while I was listening. So I

1289
01:14:49.399 --> 01:14:53.479
<v Speaker 9>am a person of no faith, right, and I have

1290
01:14:55.039 --> 01:14:58.560
<v Speaker 9>always had trouble when people want to ask people to, like,

1291
01:14:58.840 --> 01:15:04.880
<v Speaker 9>you know, explain the Trinity, right, because I just don't

1292
01:15:04.960 --> 01:15:07.600
<v Speaker 9>understand it. I think there's you know, like an identity

1293
01:15:07.640 --> 01:15:11.920
<v Speaker 9>claim being made here that just seems incoherent, right and

1294
01:15:11.960 --> 01:15:14.840
<v Speaker 9>any But the problem is, anytime I ask someone to

1295
01:15:14.920 --> 01:15:18.520
<v Speaker 9>explain it to me, they they usually just say like, oh,

1296
01:15:18.560 --> 01:15:22.039
<v Speaker 9>it's it's complicated, go study it or something.

1297
01:15:22.079 --> 01:15:25.279
<v Speaker 5>But what do you mean an identity claim?

1298
01:15:25.720 --> 01:15:28.079
<v Speaker 9>Right? So? I mean the claim that you know, like

1299
01:15:28.199 --> 01:15:32.479
<v Speaker 9>Jesus and Nazareth is identical to God and you know.

1300
01:15:32.880 --> 01:15:35.439
<v Speaker 5>Uh, well, I mean that's the revelation that's given a

1301
01:15:35.479 --> 01:15:37.560
<v Speaker 5>script for us, so right, right.

1302
01:15:37.439 --> 01:15:40.279
<v Speaker 9>So so I just mean, I just mean, this is

1303
01:15:40.600 --> 01:15:42.439
<v Speaker 9>like it seems fairly incoherent to me.

1304
01:15:42.640 --> 01:15:44.880
<v Speaker 5>And so why why is it incoherent?

1305
01:15:45.960 --> 01:15:49.960
<v Speaker 9>Because obviously Jesus has a lot of properties like Jesus

1306
01:15:49.960 --> 01:15:54.359
<v Speaker 9>and Nazareth is finite, he's contingent, he's a human being.

1307
01:15:54.399 --> 01:15:57.399
<v Speaker 5>Well, those are properties that is human nature, so that wouldn't.

1308
01:15:57.039 --> 01:15:59.039
<v Speaker 9>Have a So this is what I mean, though, this

1309
01:15:59.119 --> 01:16:00.880
<v Speaker 9>is this doesn't really make sense to me. How does

1310
01:16:00.880 --> 01:16:01.239
<v Speaker 9>that work?

1311
01:16:01.359 --> 01:16:03.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's a fallacy because something doesn't make sense to

1312
01:16:03.960 --> 01:16:05.560
<v Speaker 5>you that it's there for false. That has nothing to

1313
01:16:05.560 --> 01:16:06.600
<v Speaker 5>do with whether it's true fault.

1314
01:16:06.640 --> 01:16:08.760
<v Speaker 9>But this is, this is what I'm asking, though I'm

1315
01:16:08.800 --> 01:16:09.600
<v Speaker 9>not like I.

1316
01:16:09.520 --> 01:16:11.439
<v Speaker 5>Mean, I'm trying to answer, and you keep interrupting every

1317
01:16:11.439 --> 01:16:16.119
<v Speaker 5>time I now here we go. Yeah, So why is

1318
01:16:16.159 --> 01:16:19.479
<v Speaker 5>it a problem to say that his human nature, which

1319
01:16:19.720 --> 01:16:22.039
<v Speaker 5>if something is created as human nature, is it's going

1320
01:16:22.119 --> 01:16:24.840
<v Speaker 5>to have the properties of being a creature? Why was that?

1321
01:16:24.880 --> 01:16:27.239
<v Speaker 5>Why would that be a quote contradiction or contrary to

1322
01:16:28.079 --> 01:16:31.479
<v Speaker 5>divinity taking on and having a both and versus an

1323
01:16:31.520 --> 01:16:33.520
<v Speaker 5>either or So your assumption is that has to be

1324
01:16:33.560 --> 01:16:37.600
<v Speaker 5>either or either Jesus is no longer divine and becomes finite,

1325
01:16:37.960 --> 01:16:40.199
<v Speaker 5>and that it can't be both, and why.

1326
01:16:41.520 --> 01:16:44.079
<v Speaker 9>Because that I mean at that point, you're just not

1327
01:16:44.560 --> 01:16:47.399
<v Speaker 9>You're no longer making the claim that Jesus is identical.

1328
01:16:46.960 --> 01:16:48.840
<v Speaker 5>To God, right if if he has no he's the

1329
01:16:48.920 --> 01:16:52.560
<v Speaker 5>second person of the Godhead, the son taking on human nature.

1330
01:16:53.199 --> 01:16:56.199
<v Speaker 9>How that actually works though? Right? So, so like, are

1331
01:16:56.239 --> 01:16:58.399
<v Speaker 9>you making an identity claim here or are you not right?

1332
01:16:58.439 --> 01:17:00.640
<v Speaker 5>He is the son of God, he is fully divine,

1333
01:17:00.640 --> 01:17:03.359
<v Speaker 5>He's the second person of the Godhead. So you're saying that,

1334
01:17:03.439 --> 01:17:05.159
<v Speaker 5>I guess your argument is that the Trinity itself is

1335
01:17:05.199 --> 01:17:05.680
<v Speaker 5>in coherent.

1336
01:17:05.720 --> 01:17:09.399
<v Speaker 9>Why, Well, this is what I came to talk to

1337
01:17:09.399 --> 01:17:12.479
<v Speaker 9>you about, right, I Like, I'm just saying when I

1338
01:17:12.520 --> 01:17:14.680
<v Speaker 9>ask people about it, usually they tell me to go

1339
01:17:14.720 --> 01:17:15.680
<v Speaker 9>study it is complicated.

1340
01:17:15.840 --> 01:17:18.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm happy to address and make the argument for

1341
01:17:18.279 --> 01:17:20.399
<v Speaker 5>the trinity. So I want to know first why something

1342
01:17:20.439 --> 01:17:23.239
<v Speaker 5>being one in many is? Why is something being one

1343
01:17:23.239 --> 01:17:24.199
<v Speaker 5>in many incoherent?

1344
01:17:25.560 --> 01:17:29.560
<v Speaker 9>Because again that that just obviously seems like a contradiction.

1345
01:17:29.680 --> 01:17:32.159
<v Speaker 5>Okay, because you call it obviously a contradiction. Okay, So

1346
01:17:32.239 --> 01:17:36.079
<v Speaker 5>the numbers, the number, you know, the number three is

1347
01:17:36.119 --> 01:17:38.279
<v Speaker 5>both one and three at the same time. Is that

1348
01:17:38.319 --> 01:17:39.880
<v Speaker 5>therefore a contradiction.

1349
01:17:40.279 --> 01:17:43.720
<v Speaker 9>That I just denied the claim? Like, I don't think

1350
01:17:43.760 --> 01:17:47.039
<v Speaker 9>the number three, number one. I'm not I'm not a

1351
01:17:47.119 --> 01:17:49.279
<v Speaker 9>numerical realist, right, so I don't think the numbers.

1352
01:17:49.439 --> 01:17:51.560
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't matter whether you think that it has objected.

1353
01:17:51.560 --> 01:17:53.720
<v Speaker 5>I didn't even ask you about the ontological status of

1354
01:17:53.760 --> 01:17:56.279
<v Speaker 5>the number. I just simply said, whatever you have, why

1355
01:17:56.399 --> 01:17:59.199
<v Speaker 5>you keep interrupting me when I do? Why do you?

1356
01:17:59.279 --> 01:18:01.079
<v Speaker 5>Because I'm using it as an example. Even if you

1357
01:18:01.079 --> 01:18:04.720
<v Speaker 5>think that it's not an ontologically real thing, whatever realness

1358
01:18:04.720 --> 01:18:07.880
<v Speaker 5>it has or lack thereof, it is both three and

1359
01:18:07.920 --> 01:18:11.000
<v Speaker 5>one at the same time. Likewise, objects in the natural

1360
01:18:11.039 --> 01:18:16.000
<v Speaker 5>world have multiple reality. They have a multiplicity to them

1361
01:18:16.039 --> 01:18:18.399
<v Speaker 5>at the same time as being a unity. So there's

1362
01:18:18.399 --> 01:18:21.199
<v Speaker 5>nothing inherently contradictory about something being one and many.

1363
01:18:22.039 --> 01:18:23.720
<v Speaker 9>So can you give an example of something in the

1364
01:18:23.800 --> 01:18:25.520
<v Speaker 9>natural world that's the appropriate.

1365
01:18:26.079 --> 01:18:28.399
<v Speaker 5>Any object in the natural world has a unit of

1366
01:18:28.399 --> 01:18:30.199
<v Speaker 5>aspect to it to make of that object as well

1367
01:18:30.239 --> 01:18:32.039
<v Speaker 5>as the whole the parts that make it up. So

1368
01:18:32.159 --> 01:18:34.680
<v Speaker 5>all mariology which is partial relationships.

1369
01:18:34.960 --> 01:18:37.760
<v Speaker 9>But usually when I try, and you know, suggest that

1370
01:18:38.199 --> 01:18:40.279
<v Speaker 9>to people who believe in the trinity, that's a harrisy

1371
01:18:40.359 --> 01:18:41.680
<v Speaker 9>called modalism, right or isn't it?

1372
01:18:41.800 --> 01:18:44.079
<v Speaker 5>Or no, I'm not arguing that there's a one to

1373
01:18:44.119 --> 01:18:47.600
<v Speaker 5>one correspondence between the created object and God. I'm saying

1374
01:18:47.600 --> 01:18:50.600
<v Speaker 5>that there's nothing inherently contradictive about something being one and

1375
01:18:50.640 --> 01:18:53.720
<v Speaker 5>many at the same time, right, And so then your

1376
01:18:53.760 --> 01:18:57.119
<v Speaker 5>original contention doesn't work for the trinity being a contradiction.

1377
01:18:57.960 --> 01:18:58.720
<v Speaker 9>Let me let me talk.

1378
01:18:58.760 --> 01:19:01.039
<v Speaker 5>Okay, now, you let me talk. You're on my stream

1379
01:19:01.039 --> 01:19:02.800
<v Speaker 5>and you keep interrupting me every time I give you

1380
01:19:02.840 --> 01:19:05.800
<v Speaker 5>an answer to here you go get what's the problem

1381
01:19:05.840 --> 01:19:06.479
<v Speaker 5>with the one of the many?

1382
01:19:07.319 --> 01:19:10.680
<v Speaker 9>Right? So the issue is when I suggest that the

1383
01:19:10.760 --> 01:19:14.479
<v Speaker 9>relation between you know, the persons of the Godhead and

1384
01:19:14.680 --> 01:19:17.159
<v Speaker 9>the God right, what it might be like the relation

1385
01:19:17.279 --> 01:19:19.439
<v Speaker 9>between you know, a whole and it's compositive.

1386
01:19:19.800 --> 01:19:20.840
<v Speaker 5>There's nothing wrong with that.

1387
01:19:21.359 --> 01:19:24.680
<v Speaker 9>And that's not what they're saying, right, that's a heresy.

1388
01:19:24.279 --> 01:19:27.560
<v Speaker 5>Called motiv No, you're misunderstanding. That's why I just told you.

1389
01:19:27.640 --> 01:19:30.199
<v Speaker 5>It's not a one to one correspondence. I'm saying that

1390
01:19:30.479 --> 01:19:33.319
<v Speaker 5>even in the work that it does, it does know,

1391
01:19:33.520 --> 01:19:36.800
<v Speaker 5>it works to show that there's nothing inherently contradictory about

1392
01:19:36.840 --> 01:19:39.560
<v Speaker 5>something being one and many because it's true.

1393
01:19:39.319 --> 01:19:41.159
<v Speaker 9>In the it's.

1394
01:19:40.880 --> 01:19:44.760
<v Speaker 5>True in the if it's true in the shut up.

1395
01:19:45.920 --> 01:19:47.880
<v Speaker 5>It is like it it's an analogy. You don't know

1396
01:19:47.880 --> 01:19:49.600
<v Speaker 5>what an analogy is. You don't think I can make

1397
01:19:49.600 --> 01:19:50.600
<v Speaker 5>an analogy.

1398
01:19:50.199 --> 01:19:53.319
<v Speaker 9>The analogy, but you just a mission. The analogy doesn't

1399
01:19:53.359 --> 01:19:54.039
<v Speaker 9>work because.

1400
01:19:53.800 --> 01:19:56.159
<v Speaker 5>It's you're not even listening to what I'm saying. I'm

1401
01:19:56.199 --> 01:20:00.800
<v Speaker 5>saying that it's not inherently contradictory in the cre created realm,

1402
01:20:01.159 --> 01:20:04.079
<v Speaker 5>and so therefore you can't say that it's therefore contradictory

1403
01:20:04.079 --> 01:20:05.119
<v Speaker 5>in any other realm.

1404
01:20:05.199 --> 01:20:07.039
<v Speaker 9>That's the point I'm as.

1405
01:20:08.000 --> 01:20:10.199
<v Speaker 5>I just refuted your point. Did you not hear what

1406
01:20:10.239 --> 01:20:13.079
<v Speaker 5>I said? I'm asking can you restate what my argument was?

1407
01:20:13.159 --> 01:20:15.880
<v Speaker 5>Can you restate it? Can you re say.

1408
01:20:15.720 --> 01:20:18.800
<v Speaker 9>That you agreed with me that this is not actually.

1409
01:20:18.960 --> 01:20:21.800
<v Speaker 5>I said, it's an analogy, not one to one correspondence.

1410
01:20:23.319 --> 01:20:25.680
<v Speaker 9>Okay, so then how is that supposed to help me

1411
01:20:25.800 --> 01:20:26.359
<v Speaker 9>understand it?

1412
01:20:26.439 --> 01:20:29.119
<v Speaker 5>Because if it's not a contradiction in the created realm,

1413
01:20:29.159 --> 01:20:31.880
<v Speaker 5>there's no basis to say it's therefore a contradiction against.

1414
01:20:31.840 --> 01:20:35.000
<v Speaker 9>On God, I'm trying to understand the cling, though I'm not.

1415
01:20:35.039 --> 01:20:37.239
<v Speaker 9>I'm not saying that it's a contradiction.

1416
01:20:36.800 --> 01:20:37.119
<v Speaker 7>Right man.

1417
01:20:37.159 --> 01:20:39.119
<v Speaker 5>If the problem of that you did know, now you're

1418
01:20:39.159 --> 01:20:41.079
<v Speaker 5>lying because you said at the beginning. It was a contradiction.

1419
01:20:41.159 --> 01:20:43.399
<v Speaker 5>You said the Trinity was a contradiction at the beginning,

1420
01:20:43.520 --> 01:20:45.359
<v Speaker 5>and I'm showing you that there's no necessity.

1421
01:20:46.199 --> 01:20:48.319
<v Speaker 9>You don't get it.

1422
01:20:48.920 --> 01:20:54.920
<v Speaker 5>You're wasting our time. Yeah, because you're not listening to

1423
01:20:54.960 --> 01:20:57.119
<v Speaker 5>the argument, and you're not addressing what I'm telling you.

1424
01:20:57.119 --> 01:21:00.920
<v Speaker 5>You just keep stating your original position over and over. Yeah,

1425
01:21:00.960 --> 01:21:10.760
<v Speaker 5>he ran away. I didn't block him. He ran away. Joe, right,

1426
01:21:11.119 --> 01:21:13.039
<v Speaker 5>I just want to hear my voice talk and talk

1427
01:21:13.039 --> 01:21:16.479
<v Speaker 5>ARETI believe numbers are real. He argued at the very

1428
01:21:16.520 --> 01:21:20.439
<v Speaker 5>beginning that the Trinity is contradictory and incoherent. By the way,

1429
01:21:20.439 --> 01:21:23.319
<v Speaker 5>if something is incoherent, then by extension it's a contradiction.

1430
01:21:23.640 --> 01:21:25.600
<v Speaker 5>And then he's saying I never said it with a contradiction.

1431
01:21:25.840 --> 01:21:28.159
<v Speaker 5>Itheists are such liars, dude. I can't stand these people.

1432
01:21:28.159 --> 01:21:33.479
<v Speaker 5>Go ahead, But I mean, if you're an atheist or

1433
01:21:33.479 --> 01:21:34.279
<v Speaker 5>is nothing wrong with line?

1434
01:21:34.319 --> 01:21:34.720
<v Speaker 7>Go ahead?

1435
01:21:34.760 --> 01:21:40.560
<v Speaker 5>What's up? Joe Hey?

1436
01:21:40.600 --> 01:21:52.640
<v Speaker 9>Hello? Hello hearing? Yes, Okay, sorry, I was just wondering.

1437
01:21:53.159 --> 01:22:00.000
<v Speaker 15>Obviously you're orthodox anti papists. Inquotation marks the whole first

1438
01:22:00.079 --> 01:22:05.439
<v Speaker 15>millennium Church had absolutely succession of popes from Peter. So

1439
01:22:07.439 --> 01:22:12.720
<v Speaker 15>I'm just I haven't heard your argument as to I mean,

1440
01:22:12.960 --> 01:22:15.000
<v Speaker 15>there's been a valid pope since Peter, Right.

1441
01:22:16.000 --> 01:22:18.199
<v Speaker 5>Maybe it would befit you to actually learn some of

1442
01:22:18.239 --> 01:22:20.960
<v Speaker 5>the basics of the positions before bringing something like that.

1443
01:22:21.039 --> 01:22:23.079
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you don't think that we know that? Do

1444
01:22:23.119 --> 01:22:25.760
<v Speaker 5>you not know that there's three patron seas according to

1445
01:22:26.000 --> 01:22:28.560
<v Speaker 5>people in the West like Gregory the Great? Do you

1446
01:22:28.560 --> 01:22:33.159
<v Speaker 5>know what the three patron seas are? No, So why

1447
01:22:33.159 --> 01:22:34.520
<v Speaker 5>would you come with this kind of argument if you

1448
01:22:34.520 --> 01:22:39.560
<v Speaker 5>don't even know that? Well, not necessarily, it's basic church history, man.

1449
01:22:41.159 --> 01:22:43.600
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So maybe what.

1450
01:22:43.479 --> 01:22:46.560
<v Speaker 5>Three seeds did Peter found? What three seeds did Peter found?

1451
01:22:48.479 --> 01:22:51.039
<v Speaker 15>You're saying the three churches room?

1452
01:22:52.199 --> 01:22:53.239
<v Speaker 12>What was the Antioch?

1453
01:22:53.960 --> 01:22:58.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? And the other one Alexandria. Okay, Peter didn't found.

1454
01:22:59.680 --> 01:23:02.439
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, Sorry, I was guessing on that third one.

1455
01:23:02.520 --> 01:23:05.079
<v Speaker 4>But if you could just, I don't know.

1456
01:23:05.119 --> 01:23:07.560
<v Speaker 5>Give me a yeah. I So, if those are all

1457
01:23:07.720 --> 01:23:10.479
<v Speaker 5>petrine seas as late as Pope Saint Gregory the Great,

1458
01:23:10.920 --> 01:23:12.439
<v Speaker 5>you have the burden of proof to tell me why

1459
01:23:12.439 --> 01:23:14.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm supposed to believe the vatican One view of the

1460
01:23:14.520 --> 01:23:18.319
<v Speaker 5>papacy in the first millennium, which the Vatican now admits

1461
01:23:18.319 --> 01:23:21.119
<v Speaker 5>in the chi eighty and Alexandria documents was not the

1462
01:23:21.199 --> 01:23:22.279
<v Speaker 5>view of the first millennium.

1463
01:23:22.680 --> 01:23:24.880
<v Speaker 15>Okay, okay, I see, so I was just trying to

1464
01:23:24.880 --> 01:23:26.359
<v Speaker 15>get you to clarify your position.

1465
01:23:26.399 --> 01:23:29.159
<v Speaker 9>Warm So really the problem is with Vatican one and two.

1466
01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:33.239
<v Speaker 5>Well, the problem is that your church evolved to have

1467
01:23:33.279 --> 01:23:36.560
<v Speaker 5>all these wild claims like in the Middle Ages, when

1468
01:23:36.800 --> 01:23:40.039
<v Speaker 5>the Dictatus Pope and when I'm Sanctum documents claim that

1469
01:23:40.079 --> 01:23:42.439
<v Speaker 5>the Pope is the world emperor and that if you

1470
01:23:42.479 --> 01:23:44.359
<v Speaker 5>don't believe the Pope is the world emperor, you're damned.

1471
01:23:44.600 --> 01:23:45.199
<v Speaker 5>Do you believe that?

1472
01:23:47.279 --> 01:23:50.279
<v Speaker 15>I've been raised Catholic? So yeah, right, we submits to

1473
01:23:50.319 --> 01:23:50.760
<v Speaker 15>the pope.

1474
01:23:51.079 --> 01:23:53.840
<v Speaker 5>And okay, so you think that it's okay for the

1475
01:23:53.880 --> 01:23:55.600
<v Speaker 5>Pope to say you have to believe that I'm the

1476
01:23:55.600 --> 01:23:58.239
<v Speaker 5>world emperor and if you don't believe in that, you're damned.

1477
01:23:58.960 --> 01:24:01.600
<v Speaker 15>Well, I do believe believe that there's one true holy

1478
01:24:01.640 --> 01:24:03.159
<v Speaker 15>as What did.

1479
01:24:03.000 --> 01:24:04.960
<v Speaker 5>I just ask you? Why are you changing the subject?

1480
01:24:05.279 --> 01:24:08.680
<v Speaker 5>You said you do you believe what Unum sucked them

1481
01:24:08.680 --> 01:24:10.880
<v Speaker 5>and Dictatus pape say that the Pope is the world

1482
01:24:10.880 --> 01:24:13.640
<v Speaker 5>emperor and that you must believe that to be saved.

1483
01:24:15.279 --> 01:24:16.720
<v Speaker 9>That's really where I'm at Jay.

1484
01:24:17.279 --> 01:24:22.199
<v Speaker 4>You you are the leading you I am I am.

1485
01:24:22.319 --> 01:24:23.560
<v Speaker 5>Can you not tell me where you believe that?

1486
01:24:24.960 --> 01:24:26.640
<v Speaker 15>I don't know, because that's where I'm at.

1487
01:24:26.760 --> 01:24:28.760
<v Speaker 9>Is what I'm saying is between Catholic and Orthodox.

1488
01:24:28.800 --> 01:24:31.039
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So if you go and read these documents like

1489
01:24:31.119 --> 01:24:33.920
<v Speaker 5>Unum sunk them. I'm not making the argument. I'm not

1490
01:24:33.920 --> 01:24:35.520
<v Speaker 5>trying to be mean to you, but I don't understand

1491
01:24:35.520 --> 01:24:38.439
<v Speaker 5>why Roman Catholics always think I'm saying that that this

1492
01:24:38.640 --> 01:24:40.600
<v Speaker 5>is some argument about whether or not you got to

1493
01:24:40.600 --> 01:24:42.560
<v Speaker 5>be in the Roman calol Church to be saved. No, no, no,

1494
01:24:42.640 --> 01:24:45.720
<v Speaker 5>this is about the temporal supremacy of the Roman bishop, which,

1495
01:24:45.800 --> 01:24:49.119
<v Speaker 5>by the time of yeah, that you have to believe

1496
01:24:49.119 --> 01:24:52.600
<v Speaker 5>that he is a world emperor to be saved. That's

1497
01:24:52.640 --> 01:24:55.560
<v Speaker 5>another thing to believe. To be said, that's crazy. Do

1498
01:24:55.600 --> 01:24:58.079
<v Speaker 5>you think anybody in the first thousand years of Christianity

1499
01:24:58.399 --> 01:25:01.600
<v Speaker 5>believed that the pope was a world emperor and that

1500
01:25:01.640 --> 01:25:03.439
<v Speaker 5>you had to believe that to be saved?

1501
01:25:04.520 --> 01:25:06.239
<v Speaker 12>I have I have to agree with you.

1502
01:25:06.239 --> 01:25:11.479
<v Speaker 15>It does seem like the Roman Empire kind of push that, right, Well, it's.

1503
01:25:11.359 --> 01:25:14.079
<v Speaker 5>Not the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire becomes Byzantium. This

1504
01:25:14.199 --> 01:25:17.199
<v Speaker 5>is pushed by the Franco Papal Church of the West,

1505
01:25:17.279 --> 01:25:19.760
<v Speaker 5>not the not the Roman, not the Byzantine Empire.

1506
01:25:21.119 --> 01:25:22.960
<v Speaker 9>Right right now, I see what you're saying there.

1507
01:25:23.039 --> 01:25:24.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So what was that?

1508
01:25:25.359 --> 01:25:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

1509
01:25:26.159 --> 01:25:31.880
<v Speaker 5>Two articles Dictatus Pope and unam sunktum okay I will

1510
01:25:33.079 --> 01:25:34.960
<v Speaker 5>and when I'm sang, Tom says that you have to

1511
01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:38.279
<v Speaker 5>believe that the pope is the world emperor to be saved.

1512
01:25:38.479 --> 01:25:40.520
<v Speaker 5>Not just that you have to be in Rome to

1513
01:25:40.600 --> 01:25:44.000
<v Speaker 5>be saved. You must also believe that the Pope is

1514
01:25:44.079 --> 01:25:46.720
<v Speaker 5>King of kings and Emperor of emperors, or else you're

1515
01:25:46.760 --> 01:25:53.840
<v Speaker 5>not saved.

1516
01:25:55.119 --> 01:26:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Jamie, Hello, can you hear me?

1517
01:26:01.880 --> 01:26:02.079
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

1518
01:26:03.159 --> 01:26:04.079
<v Speaker 4>I just had a quick question.

1519
01:26:04.159 --> 01:26:05.800
<v Speaker 16>I was watching one of your past live streams, and

1520
01:26:05.840 --> 01:26:08.800
<v Speaker 16>I think you mentioned something about priests that went to

1521
01:26:08.840 --> 01:26:10.720
<v Speaker 16>seminary at the one in New York.

1522
01:26:10.720 --> 01:26:11.960
<v Speaker 4>I think it's like Saint Vladimir.

1523
01:26:12.760 --> 01:26:16.279
<v Speaker 16>Would you recommend steering away from churches that have priests

1524
01:26:16.319 --> 01:26:18.279
<v Speaker 16>that went to that seminary?

1525
01:26:18.479 --> 01:26:20.760
<v Speaker 5>No, not necessarily. I mean a lot of Orthodox people

1526
01:26:20.840 --> 01:26:22.920
<v Speaker 5>have gone to Sin Vladimir, So that itself is not

1527
01:26:22.960 --> 01:26:24.479
<v Speaker 5>going to tell you anything good or bad. It's just

1528
01:26:24.520 --> 01:26:27.399
<v Speaker 5>that there was a period when they got pretty liberal.

1529
01:26:28.039 --> 01:26:29.840
<v Speaker 5>The last I heard was that they were moving in

1530
01:26:29.880 --> 01:26:31.680
<v Speaker 5>the right direction. But I don't know. I don't keep

1531
01:26:31.760 --> 01:26:33.720
<v Speaker 5>up with Saint Latimir's But no, I would not say

1532
01:26:33.760 --> 01:26:38.880
<v Speaker 5>that that necessarily means that somebody's going to be, you know,

1533
01:26:39.720 --> 01:26:45.479
<v Speaker 5>liberal or something. So today we're looking for who disagree.

1534
01:26:45.600 --> 01:26:47.119
<v Speaker 5>So we've got a lot of people now in the chat,

1535
01:26:47.199 --> 01:26:50.319
<v Speaker 5>fifteen people in line. If you're here for frequently asked

1536
01:26:50.560 --> 01:26:53.760
<v Speaker 5>catechumen questions, please do not do that today. This is

1537
01:26:53.800 --> 01:26:57.640
<v Speaker 5>not FAQ day. I want people who disagree. That's why

1538
01:26:57.680 --> 01:27:02.640
<v Speaker 5>it says debate Kathy arth problem was on atheist, So

1539
01:27:02.760 --> 01:27:05.640
<v Speaker 5>please don't clog it up. If you just want your

1540
01:27:05.720 --> 01:27:08.319
<v Speaker 5>FAQ catechumen questions answered, well, trum be mean to you.

1541
01:27:08.319 --> 01:27:12.600
<v Speaker 5>It's just like this never fails the real JSP. What's up.

1542
01:27:19.359 --> 01:27:19.920
<v Speaker 7>Jay there?

1543
01:27:20.119 --> 01:27:24.319
<v Speaker 14>Yes, sir, so, uh, you can go a couple of

1544
01:27:24.319 --> 01:27:26.840
<v Speaker 14>different ways ahead of it.

1545
01:27:27.439 --> 01:27:30.640
<v Speaker 5>Sounds like we're about to have a fight, and you're like, listen, man,

1546
01:27:30.640 --> 01:27:32.439
<v Speaker 5>it's about to go a couple of different ways. While

1547
01:27:32.479 --> 01:27:34.439
<v Speaker 5>here you're going to get a step up and get

1548
01:27:34.439 --> 01:27:36.279
<v Speaker 5>your ass beat. Now go ahead.

1549
01:27:36.279 --> 01:27:38.319
<v Speaker 14>Well, we can have a theological discussion of more of

1550
01:27:38.359 --> 01:27:41.960
<v Speaker 14>an epistemic one sure, whatever, But so well, first, this

1551
01:27:42.119 --> 01:27:45.720
<v Speaker 14>is really simple. Your boy Dugan claims that Trump is

1552
01:27:45.720 --> 01:27:46.439
<v Speaker 14>the cat coult.

1553
01:27:47.359 --> 01:27:48.039
<v Speaker 7>What are your thoughts?

1554
01:27:48.399 --> 01:27:50.439
<v Speaker 5>How is my boy? How is Dugan my boy?

1555
01:27:51.239 --> 01:27:51.399
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

1556
01:27:51.720 --> 01:27:57.159
<v Speaker 14>Well, let's just say that was a throwaway description just

1557
01:27:57.199 --> 01:28:00.479
<v Speaker 14>based on similarities. I've noticed you mentioned him a lot

1558
01:28:00.520 --> 01:28:02.039
<v Speaker 14>and certain things that sounded.

1559
01:28:01.840 --> 01:28:03.680
<v Speaker 5>I mentioned a lot. When was the last time I

1560
01:28:03.720 --> 01:28:06.079
<v Speaker 5>mentioned Dugan? Seven years ago?

1561
01:28:06.359 --> 01:28:10.119
<v Speaker 7>You that often? Oh? No, it's quite more recent than that.

1562
01:28:10.159 --> 01:28:12.000
<v Speaker 7>But oh really do you disagree? Though?

1563
01:28:12.079 --> 01:28:14.279
<v Speaker 5>Where are the examples of me pushing Dugan?

1564
01:28:15.800 --> 01:28:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

1565
01:28:16.079 --> 01:28:17.239
<v Speaker 7>I didn't say you push him.

1566
01:28:17.479 --> 01:28:19.319
<v Speaker 5>You just said I mentioned him quite a lot.

1567
01:28:19.399 --> 01:28:24.479
<v Speaker 14>So yeah, that's not really pushing though, right. Just uh,

1568
01:28:24.880 --> 01:28:26.960
<v Speaker 14>I've seen you at least three times in the past.

1569
01:28:27.079 --> 01:28:29.319
<v Speaker 14>I certainly don't have a yeah, so again.

1570
01:28:29.439 --> 01:28:31.720
<v Speaker 5>Podcasts from twenty seventeen twenty eighteen.

1571
01:28:35.520 --> 01:28:36.239
<v Speaker 7>I'm pretty sure you.

1572
01:28:36.159 --> 01:28:38.119
<v Speaker 14>Mentioned one Jones a couple of times recently.

1573
01:28:38.720 --> 01:28:41.800
<v Speaker 5>No, not sure, Okay, So never mentioned Alexander Dugan on

1574
01:28:41.880 --> 01:28:44.439
<v Speaker 5>Jones that I recall, So what if I didn't mention him.

1575
01:28:44.600 --> 01:28:48.439
<v Speaker 5>I've made multiple times clear where I disagree with Alexander Dugan,

1576
01:28:48.760 --> 01:28:51.439
<v Speaker 5>particularly his gnostic chapters at the end of his book.

1577
01:28:51.880 --> 01:28:54.239
<v Speaker 5>So this is just like low tier, like trying to

1578
01:28:54.279 --> 01:28:56.319
<v Speaker 5>poison the well. Crap that people bring all the time

1579
01:28:56.359 --> 01:28:58.439
<v Speaker 5>where they act like I'm a Duganist, which is just

1580
01:28:58.520 --> 01:29:02.039
<v Speaker 5>dumb because I literal really have like countless live streams.

1581
01:29:02.079 --> 01:29:05.319
<v Speaker 5>I literally have countless live streams refuting gnosticism. So to

1582
01:29:05.359 --> 01:29:07.199
<v Speaker 5>come in here and call me a duganus is just silly.

1583
01:29:08.439 --> 01:29:11.319
<v Speaker 14>I think you're overstating what you know the statement you're

1584
01:29:11.319 --> 01:29:14.800
<v Speaker 14>a boy.

1585
01:29:16.119 --> 01:29:18.279
<v Speaker 7>So do you think Trump catech rightly?

1586
01:29:18.439 --> 01:29:20.680
<v Speaker 5>No, I've never made this argument. No, I don't know

1587
01:29:20.720 --> 01:29:23.279
<v Speaker 5>what you're talking about. Next argument.

1588
01:29:23.640 --> 01:29:31.119
<v Speaker 7>So you and your own Brook had a discussion somewhat.

1589
01:29:31.319 --> 01:29:34.800
<v Speaker 14>I mean Brook kind of misrepresents Ran pretty often.

1590
01:29:35.439 --> 01:29:37.000
<v Speaker 5>But oh, so you're an atheist.

1591
01:29:38.439 --> 01:29:43.600
<v Speaker 7>I am an atheist. I'm former minister. I really want

1592
01:29:43.640 --> 01:29:45.560
<v Speaker 7>to ask you a sincere question. We could talk about

1593
01:29:45.560 --> 01:29:46.439
<v Speaker 7>the like metaphysic.

1594
01:29:46.720 --> 01:29:48.720
<v Speaker 5>That's why you came with the poisoning of the well,

1595
01:29:48.760 --> 01:29:51.199
<v Speaker 5>the bullshitted dugan because you want to ask sincere questions.

1596
01:29:51.199 --> 01:29:54.720
<v Speaker 14>I really think I think you're imputing some ill will.

1597
01:29:55.279 --> 01:29:57.640
<v Speaker 14>I'm more of a curious.

1598
01:29:57.359 --> 01:29:59.600
<v Speaker 5>No, it's a it's a passive aggressive thing that I

1599
01:29:59.600 --> 01:30:01.359
<v Speaker 5>can reckon is right away. I mean I've had this

1600
01:30:01.359 --> 01:30:03.199
<v Speaker 5>a million times. Do you think I can't recognize this

1601
01:30:03.479 --> 01:30:09.319
<v Speaker 5>with your condescending giggles. Yeah, yeah, I'm really insecure. Yeah,

1602
01:30:09.359 --> 01:30:10.560
<v Speaker 5>that's why I'm letting you yap.

1603
01:30:10.600 --> 01:30:14.000
<v Speaker 7>I mean aggressive. I'm trying to have a No.

1604
01:30:14.000 --> 01:30:16.600
<v Speaker 5>You're not. This bullshit doesn't work with me, dude, Come on,

1605
01:30:16.880 --> 01:30:26.119
<v Speaker 5>get to your point. No, enough with the condescending giggle. Dude,

1606
01:30:26.119 --> 01:30:28.239
<v Speaker 5>it's just it's just it's just worthy of being made

1607
01:30:28.239 --> 01:30:28.560
<v Speaker 5>fun of.

1608
01:30:30.600 --> 01:30:31.479
<v Speaker 7>Okay, do you.

1609
01:30:31.439 --> 01:30:32.039
<v Speaker 5>Have an argument?

1610
01:30:33.279 --> 01:30:35.439
<v Speaker 14>I was going to ask you a sincere question.

1611
01:30:35.600 --> 01:30:36.800
<v Speaker 5>Okay, what's the argument?

1612
01:30:37.640 --> 01:30:41.880
<v Speaker 7>What uses your faith given that you will suffer.

1613
01:30:41.520 --> 01:30:43.960
<v Speaker 14>And die under the human condition like every other person

1614
01:30:44.000 --> 01:30:45.359
<v Speaker 14>who ever walked the sirs?

1615
01:30:46.520 --> 01:30:49.199
<v Speaker 5>Is this this is your high tier high i Q

1616
01:30:49.439 --> 01:30:50.319
<v Speaker 5>atheist argument.

1617
01:30:52.319 --> 01:30:55.359
<v Speaker 7>It's a question about why you choose faith.

1618
01:30:57.079 --> 01:30:59.439
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't. So you don't even understand my position.

1619
01:30:59.520 --> 01:31:01.279
<v Speaker 5>You have no idea what you're talking about. I believe

1620
01:31:01.319 --> 01:31:04.199
<v Speaker 5>that that revelation is so he's not gonna let me talk,

1621
01:31:04.239 --> 01:31:06.640
<v Speaker 5>He's just gonna yap. I believe the divine revelation is

1622
01:31:06.680 --> 01:31:08.560
<v Speaker 5>the ground of reason. So that's totally different from what

1623
01:31:08.560 --> 01:31:09.079
<v Speaker 5>you're arguing.

1624
01:31:11.000 --> 01:31:13.319
<v Speaker 14>So you don't you don't accept that faith? Is it

1625
01:31:13.439 --> 01:31:16.399
<v Speaker 14>a somehow an epistemic justifier.

1626
01:31:17.239 --> 01:31:21.079
<v Speaker 5>No, revelation is the epistemic justifier for logic and reasoning.

1627
01:31:22.800 --> 01:31:26.119
<v Speaker 5>So with the transcendental argument, the very thing I argue

1628
01:31:26.119 --> 01:31:27.359
<v Speaker 5>to your own books in that debate.

1629
01:31:29.479 --> 01:31:40.119
<v Speaker 7>So all right, I'm sorry constraction. Yeah, so you you're

1630
01:31:40.319 --> 01:31:43.640
<v Speaker 7>what does your your faith offer you? What does your belief.

1631
01:31:43.399 --> 01:31:46.199
<v Speaker 5>In Well, for one, it offers a justification for the

1632
01:31:46.560 --> 01:31:47.920
<v Speaker 5>possibility of reasoning at all.

1633
01:31:51.159 --> 01:31:55.560
<v Speaker 14>The possibility of reasoning is not really something that's in

1634
01:31:55.640 --> 01:31:56.920
<v Speaker 14>need of that type of justific case.

1635
01:31:57.000 --> 01:31:59.039
<v Speaker 5>Well, how do you know that? Tell me what episomic

1636
01:31:59.119 --> 01:31:59.800
<v Speaker 5>justification is.

1637
01:32:02.720 --> 01:32:04.199
<v Speaker 7>So which part of it you want to know?

1638
01:32:04.840 --> 01:32:07.039
<v Speaker 5>Well, you said it's not it's not as an apply

1639
01:32:07.159 --> 01:32:09.640
<v Speaker 5>to that, then you would know then what epistemic justification

1640
01:32:09.720 --> 01:32:11.079
<v Speaker 5>is and where it applies. So tell me.

1641
01:32:12.039 --> 01:32:17.680
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, So epistemic justification is about the positive grounds of knowledge, right.

1642
01:32:17.199 --> 01:32:19.439
<v Speaker 5>So what's the positive grounds for believing in reason?

1643
01:32:20.560 --> 01:32:24.000
<v Speaker 14>Well we can go through the relationship of perception to

1644
01:32:24.079 --> 01:32:27.760
<v Speaker 14>abstraction and which one precedes which.

1645
01:32:28.319 --> 01:32:30.039
<v Speaker 5>How do you know that? How do you know that

1646
01:32:30.079 --> 01:32:32.239
<v Speaker 5>perception relates to abstractions at all?

1647
01:32:33.960 --> 01:32:36.920
<v Speaker 7>Because of the logic. First of all, there's a logical relation, but.

1648
01:32:36.800 --> 01:32:38.520
<v Speaker 5>There's also no But I ask you how you know

1649
01:32:38.520 --> 01:32:40.479
<v Speaker 5>there's a relation. You said there's a logical relation. I'm

1650
01:32:40.520 --> 01:32:42.279
<v Speaker 5>asking you how you know that. To tell me there's

1651
01:32:42.319 --> 01:32:43.720
<v Speaker 5>a relation, doesn't tell me how you know that?

1652
01:32:46.239 --> 01:32:49.880
<v Speaker 14>Because you started to discuss self evidence before.

1653
01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:52.000
<v Speaker 5>Oh interesting, So how do we know what's self evident?

1654
01:32:53.960 --> 01:32:56.880
<v Speaker 5>So for me, for you, So it's not universal, it's

1655
01:32:56.880 --> 01:32:57.840
<v Speaker 5>just for you, it's objective.

1656
01:32:58.840 --> 01:33:01.800
<v Speaker 14>No, what I think is the correct term that applies

1657
01:33:01.840 --> 01:33:03.239
<v Speaker 14>to everyone is my premise.

1658
01:33:03.279 --> 01:33:04.359
<v Speaker 7>You know, I think you know the difference.

1659
01:33:04.439 --> 01:33:05.640
<v Speaker 5>How do you know it's self evident?

1660
01:33:07.840 --> 01:33:10.079
<v Speaker 14>So I was gonna say, what is self evident is

1661
01:33:10.119 --> 01:33:11.720
<v Speaker 14>related to direct experience.

1662
01:33:11.840 --> 01:33:15.199
<v Speaker 7>We don't justify direct experience, so I.

1663
01:33:15.119 --> 01:33:18.479
<v Speaker 5>Can disclaim anything. So I can disclaim anything as direct experience,

1664
01:33:18.479 --> 01:33:20.720
<v Speaker 5>and on how to justify it? So God is direct

1665
01:33:20.720 --> 01:33:22.960
<v Speaker 5>experience for men? On how justify it? Would you accept that?

1666
01:33:23.840 --> 01:33:26.439
<v Speaker 14>I would say that the term God is meaningless, that

1667
01:33:26.680 --> 01:33:29.319
<v Speaker 14>anyone who wants to use it as a theoretical object

1668
01:33:29.880 --> 01:33:31.840
<v Speaker 14>would have to lay out their argument.

1669
01:33:31.800 --> 01:33:34.039
<v Speaker 5>Or So what's your answer to hum? Okay? Then then

1670
01:33:34.199 --> 01:33:38.119
<v Speaker 5>what's your answer to human skepticism?

1671
01:33:38.359 --> 01:33:39.119
<v Speaker 9>In what regard?

1672
01:33:39.199 --> 01:33:39.479
<v Speaker 7>You mean?

1673
01:33:39.600 --> 01:33:42.239
<v Speaker 5>Like you're saying that you just follow your perception. You

1674
01:33:42.319 --> 01:33:45.880
<v Speaker 5>follow your perception of the relates somehow to abstractions. What's

1675
01:33:45.880 --> 01:33:48.359
<v Speaker 5>the justification that any perception relates to anything at all?

1676
01:33:48.560 --> 01:33:51.760
<v Speaker 14>My process and my view of justification, it would be

1677
01:33:51.960 --> 01:33:59.439
<v Speaker 14>arbitrary to dismiss the basis of attracted from experience, of

1678
01:33:59.479 --> 01:34:01.640
<v Speaker 14>the relation ship of something to its pattern.

1679
01:34:01.680 --> 01:34:04.359
<v Speaker 5>In other words, that's just begging the question that there

1680
01:34:04.439 --> 01:34:07.319
<v Speaker 5>is a pattern. So that there's a pattern presupposes that

1681
01:34:07.359 --> 01:34:10.560
<v Speaker 5>you're perceiving accurately information in the external world. I'm asking

1682
01:34:10.640 --> 01:34:13.880
<v Speaker 5>for the justification for that. You said it's self evident.

1683
01:34:13.960 --> 01:34:15.279
<v Speaker 7>How do we know that?

1684
01:34:16.319 --> 01:34:18.279
<v Speaker 14>Because there's nothing else to ground it?

1685
01:34:18.319 --> 01:34:21.079
<v Speaker 5>In other words, so that's also a fallacy that you

1686
01:34:21.159 --> 01:34:23.159
<v Speaker 5>claim that you're not aware of anything else to ground

1687
01:34:23.199 --> 01:34:25.119
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't mean that it's grounded. How do you know

1688
01:34:25.159 --> 01:34:25.640
<v Speaker 5>that I know.

1689
01:34:25.600 --> 01:34:26.199
<v Speaker 7>What I'm saying.

1690
01:34:27.079 --> 01:34:31.840
<v Speaker 14>I can go on to say, when we start to

1691
01:34:31.880 --> 01:34:35.279
<v Speaker 14>analyze concepts, if we in fact have a system for

1692
01:34:36.119 --> 01:34:38.800
<v Speaker 14>determining what's a good concept, right, we can see.

1693
01:34:38.640 --> 01:34:40.319
<v Speaker 5>How do you know the system is accurate? You're just

1694
01:34:40.319 --> 01:34:42.640
<v Speaker 5>telling me all these different things, like you're asserting all

1695
01:34:42.640 --> 01:34:45.000
<v Speaker 5>this stuff. What's the system that analyzes.

1696
01:34:44.760 --> 01:34:49.079
<v Speaker 14>Because the reference the content of the words reduced to

1697
01:34:49.279 --> 01:34:52.880
<v Speaker 14>a perceptual reference, and so when have you.

1698
01:34:52.800 --> 01:34:55.199
<v Speaker 5>Ever read Vickenstein? You know't know how Sully? This argument is,

1699
01:34:56.000 --> 01:35:01.199
<v Speaker 5>what's the how do you reduce numbers to perceptions? Where

1700
01:35:01.239 --> 01:35:03.079
<v Speaker 5>where in your perception is the number seven?

1701
01:35:04.359 --> 01:35:04.880
<v Speaker 7>Very simple?

1702
01:35:04.960 --> 01:35:08.520
<v Speaker 14>Very The concept one is synonymous and reduces to the

1703
01:35:08.560 --> 01:35:09.399
<v Speaker 14>concept entity.

1704
01:35:09.439 --> 01:35:11.760
<v Speaker 7>We perceive bounded particulars directly?

1705
01:35:12.079 --> 01:35:14.880
<v Speaker 5>How do you know that you perceive bound in particulars?

1706
01:35:15.199 --> 01:35:18.439
<v Speaker 5>What is the epistemic justification for saying that you that

1707
01:35:18.479 --> 01:35:20.640
<v Speaker 5>you perceive bound in particulars.

1708
01:35:22.439 --> 01:35:27.479
<v Speaker 14>If you in other words, the the epistemic justification must

1709
01:35:27.560 --> 01:35:29.920
<v Speaker 14>terminate in perception because you cannot get underneath that.

1710
01:35:30.479 --> 01:35:33.399
<v Speaker 5>So, in other words, because it must be so. So

1711
01:35:33.439 --> 01:35:39.000
<v Speaker 5>it's a dogmatic assertion that you can't justify. You just

1712
01:35:39.039 --> 01:35:40.760
<v Speaker 5>literally restated the original possession.

1713
01:35:40.840 --> 01:35:45.039
<v Speaker 7>What mean what we mean by existence? Right, we're going

1714
01:35:45.079 --> 01:35:45.479
<v Speaker 7>to stop.

1715
01:35:46.039 --> 01:35:48.159
<v Speaker 5>So you're just making more metaphysical assertions. I want to

1716
01:35:48.199 --> 01:35:49.000
<v Speaker 5>know how that's the case.

1717
01:35:49.039 --> 01:35:51.560
<v Speaker 14>You just keep a certain saying I'm saying that the

1718
01:35:51.600 --> 01:35:54.199
<v Speaker 14>content of any concept.

1719
01:35:54.000 --> 01:35:56.359
<v Speaker 5>Is how do you know that you keep stating some

1720
01:35:56.439 --> 01:35:58.479
<v Speaker 5>metaphysical claim and you don't tell me how you know

1721
01:35:58.520 --> 01:35:59.239
<v Speaker 5>that that's the case.

1722
01:36:02.159 --> 01:36:04.920
<v Speaker 14>So you know, how do I know it's the case

1723
01:36:04.960 --> 01:36:06.479
<v Speaker 14>that existence is primary.

1724
01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:08.960
<v Speaker 5>Any of your assertions that you've made in the last

1725
01:36:08.960 --> 01:36:11.880
<v Speaker 5>five minutes. You just keep asserting things and I'm asking you,

1726
01:36:11.960 --> 01:36:13.800
<v Speaker 5>how do we know that that's the case. What's the

1727
01:36:14.000 --> 01:36:16.760
<v Speaker 5>justification for that? And you said it's still fevident because

1728
01:36:16.800 --> 01:36:21.960
<v Speaker 5>of the perception. Is this is reality? Reality? Is that

1729
01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:23.399
<v Speaker 5>what you're saying? Reality is reality?

1730
01:36:23.439 --> 01:36:26.800
<v Speaker 7>Bro? No, I'm asking you. Let me ask you this

1731
01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:27.399
<v Speaker 7>would No.

1732
01:36:27.840 --> 01:36:30.039
<v Speaker 5>I've been asking you, where's the answer to the to

1733
01:36:30.079 --> 01:36:32.079
<v Speaker 5>the question? You're not you're gonna ask me a question.

1734
01:36:32.239 --> 01:36:35.880
<v Speaker 14>Well, I'm not asserting the positive. I'm not saying that.

1735
01:36:36.439 --> 01:36:38.439
<v Speaker 5>I've asked you for what reasoning is. You're told me

1736
01:36:38.439 --> 01:36:40.520
<v Speaker 5>it's perception. I'm asking you how do you know that?

1737
01:36:40.640 --> 01:36:41.760
<v Speaker 5>And you just keep asserting that.

1738
01:36:42.079 --> 01:36:43.720
<v Speaker 7>I didn't say reasoning is perception.

1739
01:36:44.359 --> 01:36:46.600
<v Speaker 5>I said, well, how do we justify reasoning? You so

1740
01:36:46.640 --> 01:36:49.239
<v Speaker 5>there has to be this grounded out perception of objects

1741
01:36:49.239 --> 01:36:51.039
<v Speaker 5>and abstractions, And I'm asking how do you know that?

1742
01:36:52.279 --> 01:36:55.880
<v Speaker 7>Pretty sure is how you freeze it. But anyway, so, what.

1743
01:36:55.800 --> 01:37:00.039
<v Speaker 14>I'm saying is that when we analyze concepts, if we infect.

1744
01:37:00.039 --> 01:37:02.680
<v Speaker 5>You're begging the question because you're assuming that there is

1745
01:37:02.720 --> 01:37:05.279
<v Speaker 5>a meaningful concept to be analyzed and I'm asking you

1746
01:37:05.279 --> 01:37:06.119
<v Speaker 5>how you know that.

1747
01:37:07.600 --> 01:37:10.479
<v Speaker 14>I told you because I experienced the reference.

1748
01:37:10.840 --> 01:37:14.239
<v Speaker 5>Oh so you're asserting the circle because it's so, because

1749
01:37:14.239 --> 01:37:17.279
<v Speaker 5>I experienced it, because it's there, because it's substrategical. You

1750
01:37:17.279 --> 01:37:21.279
<v Speaker 5>don't understand that's a circle, your very diagram, your your

1751
01:37:21.520 --> 01:37:22.880
<v Speaker 5>PfP is a circle.

1752
01:37:23.239 --> 01:37:26.520
<v Speaker 14>That axioms are irreducibly implicit.

1753
01:37:26.720 --> 01:37:29.840
<v Speaker 5>That that's I'm calling that into question. How do you

1754
01:37:29.880 --> 01:37:30.640
<v Speaker 5>know that that's the case?

1755
01:37:31.039 --> 01:37:31.359
<v Speaker 4>To question?

1756
01:37:31.680 --> 01:37:32.239
<v Speaker 7>You want a question?

1757
01:37:32.319 --> 01:37:34.119
<v Speaker 5>So your argument is there's no way to question it.

1758
01:37:34.279 --> 01:37:36.119
<v Speaker 5>That's that's so dombinude.

1759
01:37:36.279 --> 01:37:38.119
<v Speaker 14>No, no, no, there's no way to question it without

1760
01:37:38.119 --> 01:37:39.279
<v Speaker 14>presupposing its truth.

1761
01:37:39.439 --> 01:37:40.880
<v Speaker 5>That doesn't mean that it's justified.

1762
01:37:40.960 --> 01:37:45.800
<v Speaker 7>So what deny grounds concepts? You have to say? What

1763
01:37:45.920 --> 01:37:46.159
<v Speaker 7>is it?

1764
01:37:46.479 --> 01:37:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Just?

1765
01:37:46.680 --> 01:37:49.000
<v Speaker 5>You saying that it has to be that way doesn't

1766
01:37:49.000 --> 01:37:51.159
<v Speaker 5>make it. So it's not a justification.

1767
01:37:51.720 --> 01:37:53.600
<v Speaker 14>I'm saying that you can't make a statement.

1768
01:37:53.640 --> 01:37:56.079
<v Speaker 5>That doesn't Maybe we can't make statements.

1769
01:37:56.520 --> 01:37:58.720
<v Speaker 7>I mean, that's why you deny axioms. So you either

1770
01:37:58.720 --> 01:37:59.640
<v Speaker 7>have no I.

1771
01:37:59.600 --> 01:38:02.159
<v Speaker 5>Just don't think that there's self evident axioms. So what's

1772
01:38:02.199 --> 01:38:04.079
<v Speaker 5>the answer to the criterion problem? Do you know what

1773
01:38:04.079 --> 01:38:05.000
<v Speaker 5>the criterion problem is?

1774
01:38:07.079 --> 01:38:07.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we can.

1775
01:38:09.079 --> 01:38:12.079
<v Speaker 5>Do you know what the criterion problem is?

1776
01:38:12.079 --> 01:38:13.159
<v Speaker 7>The criterion for what?

1777
01:38:14.920 --> 01:38:17.640
<v Speaker 5>In epistemology. It's one of the most famous problems in epistemology.

1778
01:38:17.760 --> 01:38:18.439
<v Speaker 5>Do you know what it is?

1779
01:38:19.680 --> 01:38:21.560
<v Speaker 14>I don't know exactly you're referring to, but if you.

1780
01:38:21.560 --> 01:38:24.520
<v Speaker 5>Want to know, I'm asking you variations on the criterion problem.

1781
01:38:24.600 --> 01:38:25.840
<v Speaker 5>So I'm asking you if you even know what the

1782
01:38:25.840 --> 01:38:26.439
<v Speaker 5>problem is.

1783
01:38:27.119 --> 01:38:28.840
<v Speaker 7>I don't. I don't know what you mean by the criteria.

1784
01:38:28.880 --> 01:38:31.039
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so you have been You've been sitting here yapping

1785
01:38:31.079 --> 01:38:32.960
<v Speaker 5>and you don't even know the basic questions I'm asking you,

1786
01:38:33.039 --> 01:38:36.359
<v Speaker 5>which shows that you don't understand the problem. Yeah, right,

1787
01:38:36.399 --> 01:38:38.399
<v Speaker 5>I made it up, right, it's one. It's a pistemology.

1788
01:38:38.479 --> 01:38:39.359
<v Speaker 5>Want on when I made it up?

1789
01:38:39.600 --> 01:38:41.840
<v Speaker 14>I'm saying, I can't know what you mean if if

1790
01:38:41.880 --> 01:38:43.319
<v Speaker 14>I don't, if I haven't experienced before.

1791
01:38:43.359 --> 01:38:45.079
<v Speaker 7>So if I go to Japan a guy is talking

1792
01:38:45.119 --> 01:38:46.039
<v Speaker 7>about green, no, it just.

1793
01:38:45.960 --> 01:38:47.720
<v Speaker 5>Shows me that you don't know the discipline in the

1794
01:38:47.760 --> 01:38:49.840
<v Speaker 5>in the arena that you're trying to speak to.

1795
01:38:50.399 --> 01:38:52.239
<v Speaker 7>So does that mean I won't be able to answer you?

1796
01:38:52.239 --> 01:38:55.079
<v Speaker 5>If it does? Yes, it does, because if I don't

1797
01:38:55.119 --> 01:39:00.399
<v Speaker 5>if if modern secular epistemologists haven't solved this. You just now.

1798
01:39:00.359 --> 01:39:03.119
<v Speaker 7>Learning it or not fealous. I'm not just not learning

1799
01:39:03.119 --> 01:39:03.960
<v Speaker 7>it just because.

1800
01:39:03.800 --> 01:39:05.720
<v Speaker 5>Wait a minute, you said you didn't know what it was.

1801
01:39:07.199 --> 01:39:09.359
<v Speaker 14>Now you do saying, oh, you mean if you explain

1802
01:39:09.479 --> 01:39:11.600
<v Speaker 14>to me what you mean by the criterion problem that

1803
01:39:11.680 --> 01:39:14.159
<v Speaker 14>I won't be able to answer a question related to it.

1804
01:39:15.159 --> 01:39:27.159
<v Speaker 8>Dude, This is stupid, Josh, Dude.

1805
01:39:27.159 --> 01:39:28.640
<v Speaker 5>If you explain it to me that I'll know what

1806
01:39:28.640 --> 01:39:30.439
<v Speaker 5>it is and I'll be able to answer It's a fallacy.

1807
01:39:30.479 --> 01:39:33.279
<v Speaker 5>If you say that I can't answer it? What is it?

1808
01:39:33.359 --> 01:39:34.960
<v Speaker 5>The t dun't level stuff. I'm you.

1809
01:39:42.479 --> 01:39:44.159
<v Speaker 7>Hey, Jay a lot.

1810
01:39:44.159 --> 01:39:46.840
<v Speaker 17>I watched all your shows and uh, your boomer impressions

1811
01:39:46.880 --> 01:39:51.399
<v Speaker 17>are hilarious. My questions kind of related a little bit

1812
01:39:51.439 --> 01:39:54.039
<v Speaker 17>to the prior speaker, but I'll.

1813
01:39:53.840 --> 01:39:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Try to do the best I can.

1814
01:39:55.880 --> 01:39:59.439
<v Speaker 17>How do how does it Christian or Orthodox Christian or

1815
01:39:59.520 --> 01:40:04.399
<v Speaker 17>Catholics solve for solesism? I know you say that the

1816
01:40:04.479 --> 01:40:08.119
<v Speaker 17>starting point for knowledge has to first begin with God's

1817
01:40:08.159 --> 01:40:10.680
<v Speaker 17>existence and his divine revelation.

1818
01:40:10.800 --> 01:40:13.880
<v Speaker 5>Solism is self refuting. You use knowledge is not possible

1819
01:40:13.920 --> 01:40:16.479
<v Speaker 5>in a sense of justifying it if solvetism is true

1820
01:40:16.760 --> 01:40:18.880
<v Speaker 5>and if solcism is true. You could never know that

1821
01:40:18.920 --> 01:40:22.439
<v Speaker 5>it's true because if Solvetism is the case, and everything

1822
01:40:22.439 --> 01:40:25.399
<v Speaker 5>that you're learning is also part of the mental illusion

1823
01:40:26.159 --> 01:40:29.000
<v Speaker 5>fantasy world, dream world, whatever, and so therefore it's not

1824
01:40:29.119 --> 01:40:29.680
<v Speaker 5>quote true.

1825
01:40:31.720 --> 01:40:33.920
<v Speaker 9>So is it this might be ignorant question?

1826
01:40:34.039 --> 01:40:39.119
<v Speaker 4>Is it possible? For is it possible that.

1827
01:40:39.800 --> 01:40:42.319
<v Speaker 17>A Christian is just making this all this up in

1828
01:40:42.359 --> 01:40:42.720
<v Speaker 17>his mind?

1829
01:40:44.359 --> 01:40:46.760
<v Speaker 5>What I just said is that if that's the case,

1830
01:40:47.239 --> 01:40:50.119
<v Speaker 5>then you couldn't know it, and the knowledge of that

1831
01:40:50.199 --> 01:40:53.000
<v Speaker 5>claim is also unjustifiable. So it's a defeater for the

1832
01:40:53.039 --> 01:40:56.039
<v Speaker 5>possibility of knowledge if Soltism is true. Not trying to

1833
01:40:56.039 --> 01:40:57.279
<v Speaker 5>be rude to you, I mean to you, but go

1834
01:40:57.319 --> 01:40:59.680
<v Speaker 5>look up the critiques that I've done of the Kogito

1835
01:40:59.840 --> 01:41:13.960
<v Speaker 5>or whatever Aiden al Doorbana five dollars. You should look

1836
01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:16.640
<v Speaker 5>up the channel YouTube scripture tradition by Father j M.

1837
01:41:16.760 --> 01:41:19.039
<v Speaker 5>He's Catholic, but he's trying to convert Juice to Christianity

1838
01:41:19.079 --> 01:41:21.319
<v Speaker 5>while he's wasting his time. Because Francis says not to

1839
01:41:21.319 --> 01:41:25.560
<v Speaker 5>converge jus as did the other Vatican Two documents. They

1840
01:41:25.560 --> 01:41:28.119
<v Speaker 5>had a huge row of Francis said multiple times, not

1841
01:41:28.159 --> 01:41:37.760
<v Speaker 5>too what's up man, Aiden? I just bought your metad

1842
01:41:37.760 --> 01:41:39.520
<v Speaker 5>there his book. I'm looking forward to reading it. Thank you, man,

1843
01:41:39.520 --> 01:41:41.920
<v Speaker 5>I appreciate that. James VEGGI five dollars. I was going

1844
01:41:41.960 --> 01:41:44.880
<v Speaker 5>to request you to debate, but like a hero, you

1845
01:41:44.960 --> 01:41:48.680
<v Speaker 5>came through for the people. Thank you. It looks like

1846
01:41:48.720 --> 01:41:51.840
<v Speaker 5>Aiden's having a hard time connecting, so maybe pop back out,

1847
01:41:51.880 --> 01:41:54.359
<v Speaker 5>pop back in. We'll go back to you, Tony. He's

1848
01:41:54.399 --> 01:41:56.000
<v Speaker 5>got a picture of David Hume, so I'm sure he's

1849
01:41:56.000 --> 01:41:56.840
<v Speaker 5>going to set it straight.

1850
01:42:01.640 --> 01:42:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Hello, yep, hold a, I can't hear you anymore?

1851
01:42:07.600 --> 01:42:08.039
<v Speaker 5>Sorry?

1852
01:42:08.920 --> 01:42:09.359
<v Speaker 7>Hello?

1853
01:42:09.640 --> 01:42:11.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

1854
01:42:11.039 --> 01:42:14.079
<v Speaker 2>Oh wait, okay, I hear Can you hear me? Oh?

1855
01:42:14.079 --> 01:42:16.560
<v Speaker 6>Okay? So I have some several questions I would like

1856
01:42:16.600 --> 01:42:22.039
<v Speaker 6>to present to you regarding tag and so specifically, why

1857
01:42:22.399 --> 01:42:24.640
<v Speaker 6>like can we question divine revelation?

1858
01:42:25.039 --> 01:42:27.039
<v Speaker 2>Because you say that divine revelation.

1859
01:42:26.800 --> 01:42:29.840
<v Speaker 6>Is the ground for epistemology, you know, metaphysics and ethics

1860
01:42:30.279 --> 01:42:31.239
<v Speaker 6>and reason itself.

1861
01:42:31.640 --> 01:42:34.119
<v Speaker 2>But can we question it certain?

1862
01:42:34.119 --> 01:42:37.399
<v Speaker 5>I mean you can. There's nothing stopping you from existentially

1863
01:42:37.479 --> 01:42:38.399
<v Speaker 5>questioning everything.

1864
01:42:40.439 --> 01:42:42.239
<v Speaker 6>Uh So, like if I ask you, how do you

1865
01:42:42.319 --> 01:42:47.880
<v Speaker 6>know divine revelation is like actually reliable or true? Would

1866
01:42:47.880 --> 01:42:51.359
<v Speaker 6>I still have to present like a justification for that?

1867
01:42:51.520 --> 01:42:54.640
<v Speaker 6>Or because I don't. I don't get how Like you

1868
01:42:54.680 --> 01:42:58.239
<v Speaker 6>say that divine revelation is the ground is the justification

1869
01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:02.479
<v Speaker 6>for our epistol homology, right, But then when we try

1870
01:43:02.520 --> 01:43:06.960
<v Speaker 6>to justify God using the transcendental argument, we're using vison itself.

1871
01:43:07.439 --> 01:43:09.399
<v Speaker 5>So I feel like that's a category error. The fact

1872
01:43:09.439 --> 01:43:11.159
<v Speaker 5>that you're using something doesn't have anything to do with

1873
01:43:11.199 --> 01:43:12.439
<v Speaker 5>whether it's justified or not.

1874
01:43:16.279 --> 01:43:19.720
<v Speaker 6>No, but like, okay, the justification for God is the

1875
01:43:19.720 --> 01:43:20.800
<v Speaker 6>transcendental argument.

1876
01:43:20.840 --> 01:43:25.560
<v Speaker 5>Correct, It's not a justification for God. It's a justification

1877
01:43:25.680 --> 01:43:27.239
<v Speaker 5>for the possibility of knowledge.

1878
01:43:28.680 --> 01:43:31.479
<v Speaker 2>Okay, justification for the possibility.

1879
01:43:30.920 --> 01:43:34.840
<v Speaker 5>Of God is the only type of being that could

1880
01:43:34.960 --> 01:43:36.680
<v Speaker 5>ground the possibility of knowledge.

1881
01:43:38.880 --> 01:43:44.119
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So another question I probably would ask is I.

1882
01:43:44.039 --> 01:43:46.239
<v Speaker 5>Mean I could make a transcendental argument from a pencil.

1883
01:43:46.479 --> 01:43:49.119
<v Speaker 5>That doesn't mean that God's existence relies on a pencil.

1884
01:43:49.560 --> 01:43:52.479
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't matter what object that you choose to argue

1885
01:43:52.560 --> 01:43:55.880
<v Speaker 5>up from, Like the thing itself is just a thing

1886
01:43:55.920 --> 01:43:58.840
<v Speaker 5>that you're picking. It doesn't mean that it has ontological priority.

1887
01:43:59.119 --> 01:44:02.479
<v Speaker 5>So using red doesn't mean that reasoning comes before God.

1888
01:44:02.840 --> 01:44:07.560
<v Speaker 5>It's just logical ordering is different from metaphysical ordering. That's

1889
01:44:07.600 --> 01:44:10.159
<v Speaker 5>why it's called a category error. If I make if

1890
01:44:10.159 --> 01:44:13.000
<v Speaker 5>I make an argument from time, that doesn't mean I

1891
01:44:13.079 --> 01:44:15.479
<v Speaker 5>think that time is superior to God because I'm putting

1892
01:44:15.520 --> 01:44:16.479
<v Speaker 5>it first in an argument.

1893
01:44:17.199 --> 01:44:18.479
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I see, all right, thank you.

1894
01:44:19.239 --> 01:44:22.640
<v Speaker 6>Also another question would be, like, because I know you

1895
01:44:22.680 --> 01:44:25.960
<v Speaker 6>mentioned about identity over time for objects, what is the

1896
01:44:26.119 --> 01:44:29.640
<v Speaker 6>orthodox position of that, because I know Aristotle's theory is like,

1897
01:44:30.079 --> 01:44:32.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, objects are matter and force.

1898
01:44:32.159 --> 01:44:34.319
<v Speaker 5>I mean, yeah, we believe that God created things with

1899
01:44:34.520 --> 01:44:37.479
<v Speaker 5>natures and that they there are secondary causes, and that

1900
01:44:37.560 --> 01:44:40.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, humans have natures. Animals have the natures that

1901
01:44:40.600 --> 01:44:44.079
<v Speaker 5>they have, so that's why they have identity over time.

1902
01:44:44.159 --> 01:44:47.319
<v Speaker 5>But in philosophy, the problem of identity over time is

1903
01:44:47.680 --> 01:44:50.319
<v Speaker 5>in the domain of metaphysics and epistemology. And that's why

1904
01:44:50.439 --> 01:44:53.720
<v Speaker 5>David Hume called it into question on the basis of

1905
01:44:53.760 --> 01:44:58.960
<v Speaker 5>a pure empiricist philosophy. If pure empiricism or naive empiricism

1906
01:44:59.039 --> 01:45:02.399
<v Speaker 5>is true, there's not a justification for identity over time.

1907
01:45:02.760 --> 01:45:07.000
<v Speaker 5>We don't have that problem because we're not radical empiricists, Okay.

1908
01:45:06.760 --> 01:45:11.079
<v Speaker 6>And so my last two questions would probably be it's

1909
01:45:11.119 --> 01:45:14.600
<v Speaker 6>another objection to tag it says that it only proves

1910
01:45:14.920 --> 01:45:19.560
<v Speaker 6>conceptual existence instead of ontological existence because like.

1911
01:45:20.520 --> 01:45:23.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, number one, if you prove that something existed conceptually,

1912
01:45:24.039 --> 01:45:26.640
<v Speaker 5>that's still also a metaphysical statement. You're saying that it

1913
01:45:26.680 --> 01:45:30.199
<v Speaker 5>has the metaphysical ontological status of conceptual existence, so it's

1914
01:45:30.199 --> 01:45:33.319
<v Speaker 5>still metaphysical. But no, the argument is not just arguing

1915
01:45:33.319 --> 01:45:37.199
<v Speaker 5>for conceptual things. The argument is about worldviews. And that's

1916
01:45:37.239 --> 01:45:39.239
<v Speaker 5>why I always make the worldview argument.

1917
01:45:41.600 --> 01:45:44.840
<v Speaker 6>Oh I seek oh, because like universals must have an

1918
01:45:44.840 --> 01:45:47.199
<v Speaker 6>ontological existence and therefore something.

1919
01:45:47.000 --> 01:45:49.479
<v Speaker 5>That you're just picking one thing. I mean, you can

1920
01:45:49.520 --> 01:45:53.399
<v Speaker 5>make the argument from pencils, from universals, from math. It

1921
01:45:53.399 --> 01:45:57.319
<v Speaker 5>doesn't matter like which thing you pick. Like, it's ultimately

1922
01:45:57.359 --> 01:46:01.479
<v Speaker 5>an argue for a holistic worldview. It's not an argument

1923
01:46:01.600 --> 01:46:07.239
<v Speaker 5>for universals. Okay, it's an argument for the Christian paradigm

1924
01:46:07.479 --> 01:46:10.319
<v Speaker 5>explaining universals. It's not an argument for universals.

1925
01:46:12.159 --> 01:46:14.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, thank you, thank you, jam.

1926
01:46:14.159 --> 01:46:15.439
<v Speaker 5>Those are great questions. I appreciate that.

1927
01:46:15.520 --> 01:46:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's one more.

1928
01:46:16.800 --> 01:46:22.279
<v Speaker 6>It's Laurence Bonjours rational a priory insights. Why can't an

1929
01:46:22.279 --> 01:46:25.199
<v Speaker 6>atheist like whenever you ask them, can you what's the

1930
01:46:25.359 --> 01:46:29.680
<v Speaker 6>justification for logic metaphase? Like you present the problem with

1931
01:46:29.760 --> 01:46:33.159
<v Speaker 6>the criterion, right, like what's your epistemic criteria?

1932
01:46:33.239 --> 01:46:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Why can't they just say.

1933
01:46:34.319 --> 01:46:36.760
<v Speaker 6>That they have like a rational a priory insight to

1934
01:46:36.840 --> 01:46:38.399
<v Speaker 6>it that justifies it.

1935
01:46:38.840 --> 01:46:42.439
<v Speaker 5>Well, just just asserting a rational a priori just insight

1936
01:46:42.560 --> 01:46:44.960
<v Speaker 5>isn't a justification, and that's an assertion. So we need

1937
01:46:45.000 --> 01:46:48.239
<v Speaker 5>to know why and how that's a justification. And also

1938
01:46:48.319 --> 01:46:50.680
<v Speaker 5>how does that actually solve the criteria problem by asserting

1939
01:46:50.680 --> 01:46:51.439
<v Speaker 5>that to be the case.

1940
01:46:53.079 --> 01:46:56.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Bonjour says, it's like a rational force that you know,

1941
01:46:56.560 --> 01:46:59.000
<v Speaker 6>like we have to grasp the necessary truth.

1942
01:46:59.600 --> 01:47:00.439
<v Speaker 4>Well maybe that's problem.

1943
01:47:00.880 --> 01:47:02.199
<v Speaker 5>Why do we have to do that? I mean it

1944
01:47:02.239 --> 01:47:04.239
<v Speaker 5>so who I mean again, it's just it's really I mean,

1945
01:47:04.279 --> 01:47:06.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm not saying that you're wrong for bring it up,

1946
01:47:06.720 --> 01:47:10.000
<v Speaker 5>but it's kind of not addressing the question because it's

1947
01:47:10.039 --> 01:47:11.880
<v Speaker 5>quite like if we think about the for those that

1948
01:47:11.920 --> 01:47:14.399
<v Speaker 5>don't know the audience, if we think about the criterion problem. Basically,

1949
01:47:14.439 --> 01:47:17.239
<v Speaker 5>the idea is just this, if I say that I

1950
01:47:17.319 --> 01:47:19.960
<v Speaker 5>have knowledge of something, it doesn't matter what I haven't.

1951
01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:22.840
<v Speaker 5>I have knowledge that I think is true, justified whatever,

1952
01:47:23.039 --> 01:47:29.039
<v Speaker 5>just what true belief? And that also assumes some criteria

1953
01:47:29.079 --> 01:47:31.239
<v Speaker 5>of knowledge, right, because to say that you have true

1954
01:47:31.279 --> 01:47:35.359
<v Speaker 5>knowledge versus false knowledge requires some kind of criteria to

1955
01:47:35.399 --> 01:47:39.039
<v Speaker 5>adjudicate between them. But if I say that I have knowledge,

1956
01:47:39.119 --> 01:47:41.920
<v Speaker 5>it's assuming a criteria knowledge. But how do I have

1957
01:47:42.000 --> 01:47:44.680
<v Speaker 5>knowledge without their criteria? But if I say that I

1958
01:47:44.720 --> 01:47:48.000
<v Speaker 5>have the criteria first, that's also a knowledge claim. And

1959
01:47:48.079 --> 01:47:52.920
<v Speaker 5>so it's a seemingly irresolvable problem. That's the criteria problem.

1960
01:47:52.960 --> 01:47:55.039
<v Speaker 5>That's what I was asking. That goofy atheist guy had

1961
01:47:55.079 --> 01:47:55.880
<v Speaker 5>no idea what it was.

1962
01:47:56.279 --> 01:48:00.279
<v Speaker 6>Earlier, Pat sure Roderick Chisholm said that methodism in particulars

1963
01:48:00.880 --> 01:48:02.600
<v Speaker 6>they both beg the question, no matter.

1964
01:48:02.399 --> 01:48:05.279
<v Speaker 5>What, Yeah, exactly there you are. So that's what the

1965
01:48:05.319 --> 01:48:07.439
<v Speaker 5>problem is. And what I'm saying is that when you

1966
01:48:07.680 --> 01:48:10.720
<v Speaker 5>say to try to solve it something like well we

1967
01:48:10.840 --> 01:48:13.560
<v Speaker 5>just kind of have some kind of a priori force

1968
01:48:13.720 --> 01:48:16.800
<v Speaker 5>or whatever, but like that doesn't tell me that that's

1969
01:48:16.880 --> 01:48:21.520
<v Speaker 5>the case, And it also begs the question because that's

1970
01:48:21.560 --> 01:48:24.319
<v Speaker 5>another knowledge claim.

1971
01:48:24.319 --> 01:48:27.199
<v Speaker 2>I see. Oh, okay, thank you so much. I appreciate it.

1972
01:48:27.279 --> 01:48:34.920
<v Speaker 5>Sure No, there's a great question. Appreciate it. Thank you, Xenodrome.

1973
01:48:36.439 --> 01:48:40.439
<v Speaker 5>That's a cool name. David Atlas ten dollars mer Christmas Jay, Hey,

1974
01:48:40.439 --> 01:48:42.439
<v Speaker 5>thank you, David Adlas. Appreciate that mery, Christmas to you too.

1975
01:48:43.399 --> 01:48:45.239
<v Speaker 5>Jingle Jingle, jingle,
