Speaker 1: Welcome to sixty agenda. We are back to talk about
Speaker 1: what they want and today Ben is back with his
Speaker 1: frequent flyer here to talk about exposure Gate. Get some
Speaker 1: of his expertise on the aspect of the alternative media
Speaker 1: the controlled mocking Bird industrial complex. We're going to get
Speaker 1: into that aspect of exposure Gate, which is kind of
Speaker 1: the new series slash thing I think is going on currently.
Speaker 1: So welcome in Ben. Good to see you again.
Speaker 2: Bud Hey, thank you for always having me on the show.
Speaker 2: I always enjoyed talking with you, and you're right to me,
Speaker 2: there's no difference between the mainstream alternative media and the
Speaker 2: mainstream media. I personally don't subscribe to the idea that
Speaker 2: it's about the message not the messenger. I used to,
Speaker 2: which is why I actually thought Trump was fighting the
Speaker 2: good ball for a brief moment of time. But when
Speaker 2: you actually understand how intelligence networks work, and we understand
Speaker 2: how Operation Mockingbird works, when you understand how controlled opposition works,
Speaker 2: to me, the messenger is just as important as the message,
Speaker 2: because once you understand about biblical prophecy, what they're trying
Speaker 2: to manufacture, what you'll realize is that the mainstream media
Speaker 2: and the mainstream media. Despite looking like they're in opposition
Speaker 2: to each other, they're ultimately going to lead us all
Speaker 2: down the same path of destruction exactly.
Speaker 1: And so I think these agents are part of something
Speaker 1: called exposure Gate, which is the thing that we're kind
Speaker 1: of going to be, you know, encompassing this whole kind
Speaker 1: of topic around. But essentially what that is, in a nutshell,
Speaker 1: is the government or this elite cabal will hide something
Speaker 1: for decades, maybe allow some partial leaks, and then manage
Speaker 1: the narrative once the truth kind of becomes you know, inevitable,
Speaker 1: or you know, they just decide to use it to
Speaker 1: their advantage. And I think that we're seeing a they've
Speaker 1: always done this. This isn't something that's necessarily new, but
Speaker 1: it's being done right now at a massive scale, and
Speaker 1: we can you know, in the last episode, I went
Speaker 1: into the fact that there was like five different things
Speaker 1: that came out one day that were major, you know,
Speaker 1: cure for cancer sixty years old that you could have
Speaker 1: used lime disease was made in a lab by the CIA,
Speaker 1: and you know, Operation Mongoose is real, and they were
Speaker 1: using chemicals to try to alter people's personalities and control
Speaker 1: their their minds, right, so through vaccines, by the way,
Speaker 1: and so all these conspiracies being proven true, and I'm
Speaker 1: going why, like, what's going on? Because this is a
Speaker 1: massive like the floodgates have opened, and so that usually
Speaker 1: indicates something major on the other side of that. And
Speaker 1: so that's why I'm sounding the alarms like, all right,
Speaker 1: I don't know what's coming, but we should be looking
Speaker 1: at it. I mean, I think I did that. You know,
Speaker 1: we should be looking at that. So, yeah, exposure gate
Speaker 1: is upon us.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I think the reason why so much truth is
Speaker 2: starting to bubble to the surface is because they want
Speaker 2: us to accept their new system that they're guiding us into.
Speaker 2: And in order for us to accept it, we need
Speaker 2: to become disillusioned with the old system. That's kind of
Speaker 2: why they ride themselves out. I mean, we both know
Speaker 2: that QAnon was an intelligence op. We know that the
Speaker 2: people who put out the Epstein files, the read actions,
Speaker 2: what they kept back were intelligence people too. And it
Speaker 2: was interesting that the Epstein files didn't have enough teeth
Speaker 2: to put anybody away, but just enough to confirm all
Speaker 2: of our suspicions that we all learned in QAnon. So
Speaker 2: the question is why are the elite ratting themselves out?
Speaker 2: And once again, I think we know the endgame and
Speaker 2: let's just take the spiritual component of it for a
Speaker 2: while out of it. It's a one world, technocratic driven system.
Speaker 2: And I think whoever survived this war, however long it takes,
Speaker 2: and it's different facets of it, they're going to be
Speaker 2: presented with the question, do you want a government ran
Speaker 2: by a bunch of Satanic pedophiles that we're trying to
Speaker 2: fulfill a Messianic prophecy, or do you want AI and
Speaker 2: then c the Aliens? We got mister Babylon. But that's
Speaker 2: why I think all this truth is coming to light
Speaker 2: right now. It's like a false great Awakening.
Speaker 1: I agree with that. And you know, that's something that
Speaker 1: we kind of touched on with Ryan Dawson that I
Speaker 1: was talking to, was just this idea that maybe there's
Speaker 1: two global elite factions of that, but either way we're
Speaker 1: gonna end up in the same place. Right one's gonna
Speaker 1: be ran by the Satanic pedophiles, probably ushering in the
Speaker 1: AI technocratic state regardless. And then on the other hand,
Speaker 1: you have like the China Iran that seems to be
Speaker 1: a little bit more more. I guess you could say
Speaker 1: for lack of better terms, but I wouldn't use I
Speaker 1: would use that word very sparingly. I mean socially moral,
Speaker 1: you know what I'm saying, Like, they're not pushing smut
Speaker 1: and you know, things like that right as much as
Speaker 1: you'll see in the Western States. But I think they're
Speaker 1: both just the same. Again, two birds are the same,
Speaker 1: you know, two wings in the same bird rather and
Speaker 1: so yeah, I just think we're fucked either way. Whenever
Speaker 1: it comes to that.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean we talked about it earlier before the
Speaker 2: show started. Who's funding Iran. China is a major funder
Speaker 2: of Iran. They impart about twenty percent of its oil
Speaker 2: from Iran. They helped them out with intelligence, they helped
Speaker 2: them out with weapons along with Russia. And as we know,
Speaker 2: China and Russia are all part of the World Economic form.
Speaker 2: They're part of this global system. I mean, they even
Speaker 2: have this thing called Summer Davos in China, Like the
Speaker 2: Second Davos is located in China, so here you have
Speaker 2: the system. Although they appear to be opposed to the
Speaker 2: United States, opposed to this satanic you know, pedophile cult
Speaker 2: with Israel, and the Western alliances. But they're funding, you know,
Speaker 2: their opposition. It's one big, you know, clusterfuck, incessuous gang bang.
Speaker 2: And I think maybe to the public it might not
Speaker 2: look like they're pushing smut and they're not a bunch
Speaker 2: of pedophiles and stuff. But I think behind closed doors,
Speaker 2: we don't know who they worship. Actually, I think I
Speaker 2: know who they worship. I think they all worship the
Speaker 2: fallen gods. And I think part of this fallen guard
Speaker 2: worship or being possessed by these demons includes pedophilias. So
Speaker 2: just because and hey, listen, just go over to like
Speaker 2: the Saudis. Right, they don't push mutt, but it's no
Speaker 2: secret what their princes do behind closed doors. Let's just
Speaker 2: put it that way. So I wonder if the same
Speaker 2: thing happens in Iran.
Speaker 1: Two. Yeah, that's a funny point actually, where it's like
Speaker 1: people are still part of it even if they don't
Speaker 1: push smut, right, they could still be a part of
Speaker 1: that same elite system where some of them like doing
Speaker 1: crazy shit like that, but other don't necessarily, and that
Speaker 1: doesn't make them different. And it's per se right, neph Thunder,
Speaker 1: you know he's brought up a couple times, these Lloyds
Speaker 1: of London. Do you know much about them and how
Speaker 1: Trump's like warring with them, are having issues with them.
Speaker 1: I haven't heard too much about them. I'm actually very curious.
Speaker 2: As Lloyd's of London connected to the Bank, the City
Speaker 2: of London, the Bank of London. Would nef Hunter know that.
Speaker 1: Lloyds of London historic insurance and reinsurance marketplace in London,
Speaker 1: not an insurance company, so Lloyds to London countably known
Speaker 1: as Lloyd's. It's a specialized insurance and reinsurance insurance market
Speaker 1: located in London. But it's not like traditional insurance companies.
Speaker 1: Lloyds operates as a marketplace where multiple finance backers organizing
Speaker 1: his syndicates come together pull and spread risk. These backers,
Speaker 1: called members, include both corporations and private individuals. So it
Speaker 1: sounds like a fucking like like build it, I mean,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, like something almost not really
Speaker 1: but almost like that.
Speaker 2: Well, if it's located in the City of London, which
Speaker 2: is originally a stronghold for the Knights Templar until the
Speaker 2: raw child you know, changed their name from the Bowers
Speaker 2: and kind of took control of the banking wing of
Speaker 2: the Holy Roman Empire. So you know, maybe those videos
Speaker 2: that say that they're in battle with Trump, it might
Speaker 2: be to see people as in Trump as his own man.
Speaker 2: They're the bad guys. Trump's trying to do the right thing.
Speaker 2: I don't know too much about that, but if it's
Speaker 2: located in the cinity of London, just like Candice Owen's
Speaker 2: husband's father's business, you can't trust it.
Speaker 1: Definitely. I forgot what the company is, but there's major like,
Speaker 1: like they have war bonds at this one place, and
Speaker 1: I believe most of the war bonds that got taken
Speaker 1: out for the war in Gaza were taken out from there.
Speaker 1: And the wife of the guy, I think it's like
Speaker 1: his ex wife. Now she's like the richest chick on
Speaker 1: this show, like one of those housewives shows or whatever.
Speaker 1: And my wife watches that and I was like, one day,
Speaker 1: I just did a little experience and I was like,
Speaker 1: how many of these motherfuckers are connected to people that
Speaker 1: are just real sucks? Right? And eight out of ten,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. I mean, it's actually crazy.
Speaker 1: This dude, her ex husband like pretty much funded the
Speaker 1: gods of War. I mean, legit and then like this
Speaker 1: other shake on there. Her dad's like an ideaf soldier.
Speaker 1: I'm like, dude, it just goes on, and I'm like,
Speaker 1: this is actually crazy, you know, so you have it
Speaker 1: very much prevalent. And it's funny because the entertainment. And
Speaker 1: that's why I kind of pointed out to my wife.
Speaker 1: I was like, the entertainment is the enemy. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, but like literally, the enemy is your entertainment.
Speaker 1: Like you're watching the lives of these housewives. It's the
Speaker 1: housewives of people that are married to the murderous villains
Speaker 1: of the world, and we're watching them go around and
Speaker 1: spending money, all this blood money and join theirselff. It's
Speaker 1: actually fucking sadistic. Well, it's very crazy.
Speaker 2: That's why I find so hilarious about the whole Candice
Speaker 2: Owens thing fighting the system, you know, the money she has,
Speaker 2: you know, she always makes fun of the people make
Speaker 2: fun of like the seven thousand dollars club per post boy.
Speaker 2: She got paid a lot more than seven thousand dollars
Speaker 2: for the post and she fake married Lord Farmer's allegedly
Speaker 2: gay son after seventeen days. All the money that she
Speaker 2: is spending, I mean, I guess she's making some money
Speaker 2: now in the super chats and stuff like that, but
Speaker 2: the bulk of her money is blood money, straight up. Yeah,
Speaker 2: and she's never you know, she doesn't announce it, she
Speaker 2: doesn't donate it to the people in Gaza. She continues
Speaker 2: to expose, you know, the system one that she got
Speaker 2: everybody to vote for.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: So I just think it's kind of rich. You're right,
Speaker 2: it's crazy.
Speaker 1: So he was what he was saying, No, you're exactly right.
Speaker 1: What he was saying about that, I guess was he
Speaker 1: was referring to how whenever I was talking about there's
Speaker 1: two warring factions in this for control of the world.
Speaker 1: Trump on one side, not good either way, and then
Speaker 1: the Bank of London is what has been running everything. Okay,
Speaker 1: so you're saying that they're connected to the bankal it. Well,
Speaker 1: of course, I know, I'm not convinced that he's not
Speaker 1: working with the bank. I wonder what's the evidence that
Speaker 1: they are warring? I mean, you know, and again, what
Speaker 1: did you say when you have the best quote about
Speaker 1: that that these it's these I didn't want to say
Speaker 1: it's these people that were these families, these elite families
Speaker 1: that worship guys and then they all like war with
Speaker 1: each other. Sometimes you have a good you have a
Speaker 1: good like spiel about that one.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean it really is. I mean, if you
Speaker 2: kind of look at the history of Europe, and we
Speaker 2: can use the Rothchilds as an example, they were originally
Speaker 2: brought in to hire to run the banking arm of
Speaker 2: the royals throughout Europe, and before that was the Knights Templars.
Speaker 2: So I do believe throughout history you've had these bloodlines
Speaker 2: that have been worn with each other over power, but
Speaker 2: ultimately they all serve the same greater agenda. It's really
Speaker 2: set up like the Game of Thrones or the House
Speaker 2: of Dragon. And if you you know, you watch the
Speaker 2: House of Dragon, what is it? It's multiple bloodlines that
Speaker 2: fight over control of the realm. Ultimately they do so
Speaker 2: of the agenda of keeping the peasant class below them.
Speaker 2: They take their genealogy back to the dragon gods, which
Speaker 2: many of these royal families, if you look at their
Speaker 2: family crest, believe they take their genealogy back to these gods,
Speaker 2: the raw Childs. If you look at their family crest,
Speaker 2: there's a giant unicorn on it. And if you know
Speaker 2: anything about you know, Jewish stories, king Og, which was
Speaker 2: a nephelum, was writing a unicorn. It seems to be
Speaker 2: the preferred mode of transportation for Nephlom giants, So yeah,
Speaker 2: I think and then throwing you know, China, they are
Speaker 2: fighting over a bigger piece of the pie too when
Speaker 2: you go into the Lee family. Also the Rath child's
Speaker 2: married into the Lee family, they're selling their breeding rights.
Speaker 2: So yeah, I think it's totally set up like that exactly.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and yep, you have a great thing about that,
Speaker 1: you could say it. Uh so all right, let's get in.
Speaker 1: So I was just absolutely you're I mean, I just
Speaker 1: I was almost outside of myself watching the Schellenberger and
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan interview. I decided to watch that, dude, I
Speaker 1: mean every it's taken everything in me not to do
Speaker 1: a whole episode on that interview. And by that, I
Speaker 1: mean like go like point by point, talking point by
Speaker 1: talking point, because that's how many times this mother that
Speaker 1: he pissed me off. It really just pissed me off.
Speaker 1: I'm like, there's no way you're this dumb like you
Speaker 1: It's just yeah, and it's the you know, and there's
Speaker 1: a slight pushback from Joe Rogan, but it was just terrible.
Speaker 1: Uh so, you know, I mean you've got him us.
Speaker 1: You know, obviously he did this weird thing where he
Speaker 1: said that, you know, Epstein was a scapegoat, but he
Speaker 1: also said that he was doing everything on his on
Speaker 1: his own and autonomously. So it's like, how could he
Speaker 1: how could he be a scapegoat because that implies that
Speaker 1: he you got, you know, scapegoaded because other people got
Speaker 1: out of it, and so then you're also going to
Speaker 1: turn around and say that he was like by himself.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of like speaking out of both sides
Speaker 1: of his mouth that went on, Like during the whole interview,
Speaker 1: there's like.
Speaker 2: Stop thinking to Andrew when you think this type of
Speaker 2: stuff happens. He literally mentioned and net Yahu coming to
Speaker 2: you know, come in here so many times in Israel
Speaker 2: and this net name turnaround and goes But Trump is
Speaker 2: he does everything on his own, He's in his own man.
Speaker 1: I'm like, holy shit, dude, it was It was crazy.
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, you're exactly right though.
Speaker 2: The thing they want you to have this visceral reaction.
Speaker 2: I always joke you can tell someone by part of
Speaker 2: the seven thousand dollars club, because as soon as they
Speaker 2: open their mouths, it makes you want to vomit, which
Speaker 2: is all by design because remember, at least I believe
Speaker 2: within the manufacturing of this prophecy, political Zionism needs to die.
Speaker 2: So I think there's a reason why they roll out
Speaker 2: those guys like Larry Lumer or Officer tal Mood or
Speaker 2: Ben Shapiro. They just want you to get this, you know,
Speaker 2: gross tasting your mouth, and then what they're ultimately going
Speaker 2: to do is the usher you into another organization, which
Speaker 2: is you know, the Tucker Carlson's, the Candas Owens Ian Carroll's,
Speaker 2: and like I said, ultimately they're playing their side of
Speaker 2: manufacturing this prophecy and it's going to lead people down
Speaker 2: that same path of destruction.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so do you know off top of your head
Speaker 1: that Ian Carroll tucking Tucker car I mean the Ian Carroll,
Speaker 1: Candice Owens and Alex Jones connection with like General Flynn
Speaker 1: and everything.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it goes even before that. Look at Norman Pattish.
Speaker 2: So a lot of people don't know this. When Candace
Speaker 2: Owens first had the public spotlight, she was like fourteen
Speaker 2: or fifteen, I want to say, and she was suing
Speaker 2: the Sam's Stamford School Board of Education and apparently, you know,
Speaker 2: four white kids called her up, uh, said some racist things,
Speaker 2: and there was a lawsuit brought and guess who her
Speaker 2: father hired. And this is an unknown commodity at the time,
Speaker 2: this guy named Norman Pattis, And then fast forward to
Speaker 2: you know what happened on January sixth. He's actually representing
Speaker 2: the same Norman Pattis is representing Alex Jones. He's representing
Speaker 2: Nick Fuentes. He also represented Alex Jones in that BS
Speaker 2: lawsuit by the federal government for a billion dollars. There's
Speaker 2: also an article that he wrote, I believe sometimes in
Speaker 2: the eighties where he actually wrote I don't know why
Speaker 2: they do this type of stuff, but he actually wrote
Speaker 2: an article talking about how he was interviewed by the CIA.
Speaker 2: He was brought No, Norman Pattis is the guy with
Speaker 2: long hair. Just type in Norman Pattis, lawyer for.
Speaker 1: T T U S T T I S. Okay, go ahead, sorry,
Speaker 1: I was gonna show him that guy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he actually wrote an article talking about how he
Speaker 2: was interviewed by the CIA. They brought him in, they
Speaker 2: offered him a job gave him a salary. This is
Speaker 2: all an article, but he never went back and he
Speaker 2: never got the job. So here you have the Cia
Speaker 2: Jason lawyer who represented Alex Jones in the Sandy Hook trial. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: you also find out that Candice Owen's father worked at
Speaker 2: Sandy Hook in the middle of all that stuff. So yeah,
Speaker 2: there's a huge connection there.
Speaker 1: And I know it's only on Rumble, as far as
Speaker 1: I know, it's only on Rumble, but I wonder if
Speaker 1: you can find out a relation about candos Owns grandfather
Speaker 1: gro contracts, Sandy Hook contracts. Yep, controversy roots. Yeah, recent
Speaker 1: claim resurface regarding the grandfather, conservative commentator Candace Owns, alleging
Speaker 1: he oversaw crucial contracts related to the Sandy Hook tragedy. Yeah. Man,
Speaker 1: that's sus dude. I mean it really very suspigulate Alex
Speaker 1: Jones because imagine, why is that the thing that got
Speaker 1: Alex Jones hit so bad? And that is the what
Speaker 1: you can call out, Like you know, if you had
Speaker 1: a Supreme Court ruling between say like not that me
Speaker 1: and you would have to really worry about it necessarily,
Speaker 1: But like say like me and you you know what
Speaker 1: I mean, or whatever they can call out, you know,
Speaker 1: Alex Jones versus you know whatever, and Sandy Hook or
Speaker 1: hook or whatever they call it, and they could use
Speaker 1: that as now like Leverridge on why you could be
Speaker 1: prosecuted for your for your speech exactly.
Speaker 2: That was just to scare the truth tellers at the time,
Speaker 2: which was right in the middle of COVID. Right. Uh,
Speaker 2: you say the wrong thing, guess what the government come
Speaker 2: after you, So don't say it. And I'm pretty sure
Speaker 2: that once the ruling came down, Alex Jones didn't even
Speaker 2: try to fight it. And if you were truly innocent
Speaker 2: and this wasn't some big charade at least, I would
Speaker 2: definitely try to fight it. I definitely try to bring
Speaker 2: it up to the Supreme Court. They didn't try to
Speaker 2: do that. And then once again go back to what's
Speaker 2: his name who wrote Beheila white Horse Bill Cooper what
Speaker 2: There's some things about him that are a little bit suspect.
Speaker 2: I'm super black pilled if you're listening, but uh, or
Speaker 2: should I say Jesus pilled? Right? He called Alex Jones
Speaker 2: out as an off from the beginning, and it kind
Speaker 2: of makes sense, right, in order to carry out your agenda.
Speaker 2: You need to bring those in opposition to the agenda
Speaker 2: into the fold. So what did he do? For a
Speaker 2: long time, he gave some partial truths. No, granted, there's
Speaker 2: always a little bit of criticism that he didn't go
Speaker 2: after Israel and stuff like that, but he gave some
Speaker 2: parcel truths. He was, you know, everybody's conspiracy god, sugar daddy, godfather. Right.
Speaker 2: But what he do once Trump was, you know, especially
Speaker 2: the last four years, he started pushing Trump. He started
Speaker 2: pushing the AI agenda through tech Elon Musk, which is
Speaker 2: the agenda. So here you have him ushering in the
Speaker 2: opposition to this quote unquote Golden Age.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. And when here's the thing like, so, my
Speaker 1: you know, sugar daddy, my red pill daddy as I
Speaker 1: would call it, Right, I just want to say because
Speaker 1: it was funny and just actually say that out loud.
Speaker 1: It's hilarious. No, But Bill Cooper was mine, and I
Speaker 1: think that was my saving grace in getting into this
Speaker 1: world is that I didn't fall into the Alex Jones first.
Speaker 1: If I would of, I don't think I would have
Speaker 1: the perspective I have today and the skepticism I have today.
Speaker 1: I'd be going after the globalist gung ho, let's go Trump,
Speaker 1: We're gonna do it right. It would be the context
Speaker 1: was lost with people like Bill Cooper, and I think
Speaker 1: that's why people like him were put down before this
Speaker 1: all got here, right, And so whenever you take that
Speaker 1: into account, kind of looking at what he said, if
Speaker 1: that is true, and if that means that Bill Cooper
Speaker 1: was always a si off and he was Alex Jones
Speaker 1: rather was always a siop, and he was here to
Speaker 1: kind of perpetuate a lot of conspiratorial content, so that
Speaker 1: way later it could be utilized during an era that
Speaker 1: we could call exposure gate like right now, to then
Speaker 1: prove all the conspiracy theories right as soon as it's
Speaker 1: a depinnacle that they want it to be, as soon
Speaker 1: as it's mainstream and not, which I believe we're getting there.
Speaker 1: That's the whole point. Every dude, z utopia too, right,
Speaker 1: just to pick something out of the you know, brand
Speaker 1: new movie just came out, right, it's a kids movie
Speaker 1: and it's all about like a conspiratorial like it's the
Speaker 1: whole thing. Dude, having the Bobcats behind here, they're putting
Speaker 1: in the mayor to the Mayor's like, you know what
Speaker 1: I'm saying. And then it turns out that the snake
Speaker 1: started the whole utopia. So you know, I watched this
Speaker 1: with my sundayay. But I just think it's funny because
Speaker 1: it's very much a mirror of our actual reality, where
Speaker 1: you have the controllers hiding this ultimate lie and you
Speaker 1: know it's about to get out the revelation. The difference
Speaker 1: is the good guys win there, and they're using the
Speaker 1: good guys to their advantage for them to lose in
Speaker 1: our reality. And so that's the difference that I see,
Speaker 1: and it is mainstream now.
Speaker 2: It is a I've noticed that too. I know I
Speaker 2: do like to escape from the world sometime, escape from
Speaker 2: you know, X and social media and all that type
Speaker 2: of stuff. And I do like to watch a lot
Speaker 2: of television programs also, so you know, for entertainment value,
Speaker 2: but also to see what they're pushing. Right, I think
Speaker 2: we need to learn from them to understand what the
Speaker 2: agenda is. And the amount of shows now that are
Speaker 2: on Apple, that are on paramount CBS that involve conspiracy.
Speaker 2: It's really entered the public sphere of consciousness, and it's
Speaker 2: you know, like I said, it's a wild time that
Speaker 2: we live on that whenever something happens, let's just say,
Speaker 2: like the attack on that synagogue in Minneapolis, that a
Speaker 2: good portion of the Internet immediately goes fake, false flag.
Speaker 1: I mean, think how wild that is exactly. And you
Speaker 1: know what's crazy is we do live in a world
Speaker 1: where you know, there's equal amounts of real with the fake.
Speaker 1: That is just as unbelievable because we have pushed people,
Speaker 1: I think to the radical point of yeah, there's really
Speaker 1: that going on, you know what I mean, Like there
Speaker 1: really could be that going on. Like Lebanese man could
Speaker 1: have really been that mad because the bombing and the
Speaker 1: children in the schools, it had been going on that
Speaker 1: nobody's talking about over in Lebanon. They're talking about the
Speaker 1: ones that we did. What about the ones Israel have
Speaker 1: been doing consistent ever since Gaza, all the way up
Speaker 1: to now through Lebanon, through you know, So these things
Speaker 1: are very I think you know that's the point, right, So.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, but it's also very controlled. Right, So they
Speaker 2: do give us platforms where we can talk about these things,
Speaker 2: and you know X is one of them. But then
Speaker 2: when you start diving into you know, who bought X.
Speaker 2: Larry Ellison was a key figure, in fact, gave Elon
Speaker 2: Musk a billion dollars to buy X. And I knew
Speaker 2: this from the very beginning. I never trust Elon Musk,
Speaker 2: and I was, you know, one of the only people
Speaker 2: out there. The minute he bought it, I started talking crap.
Speaker 2: In fact, it was interesting. I actually my most viral
Speaker 2: video I ever made was on Instagram and it got
Speaker 2: like a million views. And it was right after Surprise Surprise,
Speaker 2: you know, Zuckerberg push an anti muss thing. But it
Speaker 2: was exposing you know who Elon Musk was. It was
Speaker 2: exposing that Larry Ellison, who's connected to the CIA, Mossad,
Speaker 2: he's probably the largest donor I think Design is Caused right,
Speaker 2: actually bought X with him, and that it was one
Speaker 2: large honeypot. But you notice everybody who moved there, especially
Speaker 2: the mainstream alternative media, and that's like their home. They
Speaker 2: were pushing it. It's just free speech. You know. Ian
Speaker 2: Carroll came out and says, I just j pilled or
Speaker 2: Israel pilled Elon Musk, And I'm like, bro, you don't
Speaker 2: think Elon Musk knows exactly what's going on. He teamed
Speaker 2: up with what's it called? And the amount of crap
Speaker 2: that I got in the very beginning for pushing this stuff.
Speaker 2: It was crazy, but you know, it turned out to
Speaker 2: be true.
Speaker 1: It is true, and I think we're really the only
Speaker 1: one seeing it. To be honest, there's nobody really talking.
Speaker 1: We're still at the point where we're still the only
Speaker 1: ones caught it out, you know what I mean, Like
Speaker 1: we're still not We're not at the point where everybody's like, okay,
Speaker 1: I'm starting to see through it. Like, you know, people
Speaker 1: are still praising Elon like a god for saving us
Speaker 1: by buying X, right, Like they still go on dr rogue,
Speaker 1: thank god, emon Musk bought X. It says, all right, dude, No,
Speaker 1: they want as many people as possible saturating this world
Speaker 1: of digital world of social media, Like people like me
Speaker 1: and you, we're falling right into it. You know, I'm
Speaker 1: willing to admit that. Oh yeah, so we could saturate
Speaker 1: everything with talking heads, talking heads, talking heads, talking heads,
Speaker 1: And the majority of the ones grabbing the ears are
Speaker 1: the ones that are usually paid the people that aren't
Speaker 1: grabbing the ears. And I think that, you know, of course,
Speaker 1: you also have like the fact that everybody's doing it
Speaker 1: too to cover up the everybody below that. And also
Speaker 1: you have people who don't really think, you know, like
Speaker 1: I don't want to be rude, but you have people
Speaker 1: that are like, you know, I can't say I know them.
Speaker 1: I know there's some good guys in this space, you know,
Speaker 1: like you and others that we speak with, but there
Speaker 1: is a lot of people who like are just kind
Speaker 1: of regular people that are like, you know, drinking a beer,
Speaker 1: barely paid attention. Now they're going to go talk about
Speaker 1: it like they know what they're talking about. And so
Speaker 1: you have that is the majority of it. You have
Speaker 1: the majority of the people that are being paid to
Speaker 1: speak a certain area that are actually the professionals. And
Speaker 1: then we kind of fall in the line of like
Speaker 1: when you see our production and you hear us, you know,
Speaker 1: without really listening for long enough, you might be like,
Speaker 1: these are just those guys that drink beer and just
Speaker 1: think they know what they're talking about, and it's like, well,
Speaker 1: fuck man, that's done to discredit people like us. They're
Speaker 1: really doing the work that are not being paid to
Speaker 1: have some major production and sell all these brands and
Speaker 1: be a brand wor rather where regular people like everybody
Speaker 1: else that actually put in a lot of work, and
Speaker 1: we just want to present information and see if it
Speaker 1: drives out and resonates and if we're crazy or not.
Speaker 1: Really it's a check on how crazy we are, right,
Speaker 1: But in reality, I think that this is all being
Speaker 1: saturated purposely to make sure that people don't know who
Speaker 1: you know, they just don't find the truth. Essentially, that's
Speaker 1: the core of it. And by the way it's set
Speaker 1: what they trust nothing too. The whole point of exposure
Speaker 1: gase too, is like if you can get everybody to
Speaker 1: trust nothing and then silo them into their own echo chambers.
Speaker 1: If we have a small group of people that do
Speaker 1: understand what's going on, like me and you, it's going
Speaker 1: to stay that small group of people because the other
Speaker 1: people are still getting siloed deeper into their own echo chambers.
Speaker 2: Why you're not getting pumped up to a million followers
Speaker 2: in two months on every single platform, like Ian Carroll.
Speaker 1: Hockey sticks, hockey sticks bro all day. I see hockey
Speaker 1: sticks in my dreams because I'm just fucking my numbers
Speaker 1: are booming. No man, they're going to keep us in
Speaker 1: our pockets. And I think that that also, it's like,
Speaker 1: what does it matter if a group of people, like,
Speaker 1: you know, a small group people know what's going on.
Speaker 1: The majority are you know, getting funneled into their own
Speaker 1: echo chambers, which are like the you know, the Joe Rogan's,
Speaker 1: and then they get a little bit deeper, maybe same triple.
Speaker 1: They get a little bit deeper, they're probably going to
Speaker 1: go off somewhere else and not like to reality. Right,
Speaker 1: So that's kind of how I view it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I also think there's different levels and culpability
Speaker 2: in this system of control. To your point, Yeah, there's
Speaker 2: at the very upper echelon, right, we're talking, and I'm
Speaker 2: just talking about the mainstream on media turn to media, right.
Speaker 2: I don't spend too much time on the seven thousand
Speaker 2: dollars club, just because it's so obvious and people who
Speaker 2: watch my show can point that out. But within the
Speaker 2: mainstream alternative media, I believe you could say the same
Speaker 2: thing about some dollar club. You have. At the upper echelon,
Speaker 2: you have those who are connected to intelligence, without a doubt.
Speaker 2: We're talking about the Tucker Carlson, Candae Owans, possibly you know,
Speaker 2: Ian Carroll, and then right below them you have all
Speaker 2: those who make money off of it right, and they
Speaker 2: need to choose a side. It's not profitable in saying hey,
Speaker 2: it's all bs, they're all bullshit because in our tribal
Speaker 2: nature and the help of the algorithm, that's what people want.
Speaker 2: So you have the intelligence on top, you have the
Speaker 2: people doing it for the bag that are just basically regurgitating,
Speaker 2: reposting everything they said and then below. And I hate
Speaker 2: using this term because I think these people are just
Speaker 2: in search of the truth like everybody else, but for
Speaker 2: lack of a better term, useful idiots who are no
Speaker 2: longer thinking, we are just reacting as set of Why
Speaker 2: is Candace saying that, especially when she's connected with her,
Speaker 2: you know, father in law. Why Sucker Carlson exposing Shapat
Speaker 2: Lubitch when he's clearly connected to intelligence and we can
Speaker 2: go into his family, you know what I'm saying. Why
Speaker 2: Ian Carroll has never met an intelligence operation that he
Speaker 2: didn't like to defend as a new kid on the block.
Speaker 2: I mean I can pull countless videos of him defending
Speaker 2: Alex Jones and having to walk that back. I mean
Speaker 2: countless videos of him telling people to vote for Trump
Speaker 2: and then to walk that back, and there was people
Speaker 2: seven sees is one of them who does a lot
Speaker 2: of great work in the space that actually caught his attention.
Speaker 2: And you know what Ian did. He just said, Oh,
Speaker 2: you're an idiot, vote for Trump, you know. So I
Speaker 2: think there's many levels. I don't want to throw shade
Speaker 2: on everybody, like their evil actors, but I do think,
Speaker 2: oh there's one. You know, if anybody has a blackmailable
Speaker 2: personal life, it's this guy.
Speaker 1: And an evil actor. There you go. I mean, come on,
Speaker 1: he doesn't even act like, don't even hide the evil part.
Speaker 1: It's just it. I mean, he's an asshole even to
Speaker 1: his fans.
Speaker 2: But I think that was Ackholm syndrome. I mean, who
Speaker 2: goes abolutely donates one hundred. That's why it's a cult.
Speaker 2: I mean.
Speaker 1: But what worries me is then he turns around and says,
Speaker 1: I'm going to vote Democrat if they don't do America
Speaker 1: first and everything. It's like, dude, you have the perfect
Speaker 1: opportunity to take these people and be like, look, it's
Speaker 1: a left right wing UNI party. We need to do something,
Speaker 1: you know, to unite, et cetera. But no, because you
Speaker 1: were controlled and you are not what you say you are.
Speaker 1: You know, you're all for the empire. You're all for
Speaker 1: going and doing regime change wars one day when we
Speaker 1: do Venezuela, but then when we do I ran. Now
Speaker 1: you're renagging on that, and you're turning around and going, oh,
Speaker 1: I would vote Democrat because we're not America first for
Speaker 1: this war and you're crying with Alex Jones about it.
Speaker 1: But you were just school with the Venezuela thing. So
Speaker 1: I'm confused now because I thought you were all for imperialism.
Speaker 1: So it's very you know, whiplash.
Speaker 2: Yeah, let me tell you something, especially with the Venezuela thing.
Speaker 2: When that happened. You know, one of the first tweets
Speaker 2: I saw was, you know, nat Rothschild supporting it, and
Speaker 2: then I see cat Boy Fuentes over there saying the
Speaker 2: same thing, and I'm like, whenever you're on the same
Speaker 2: size the raw Child's regardless of what happened, you know,
Speaker 2: you're on the wrong side. So yeah, you know, I
Speaker 2: think the agenda is like a pig. Each one of
Speaker 2: these groups, whether it's a seven thousand dollars club, the
Speaker 2: mainstream alternative media, someone like Nick Fondez who kind of
Speaker 2: seems by himself, I think they just slap a different
Speaker 2: shade of lipstick on it and expect you to realize
Speaker 2: think it's not a pig or an agenda. But I
Speaker 2: think it's all the same thing.
Speaker 1: Like he's with the sneak O party, right, like the
Speaker 1: sneak O the inhabit I mean, he's got like a
Speaker 1: group of people you could lump him in with if
Speaker 1: you wanted to, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2: Definitely Did you see that red Pill documentary on Netflix?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 2: What is that?
Speaker 1: I missed it?
Speaker 2: So they're part of the whole red Pill movement, the
Speaker 2: manosphere movement. We're talking about Myron Gains, We're talking about sneaks. Oh,
Speaker 2: we're talking about Nick fuent As, We're talking about clavicular
Speaker 2: Or he's like the new guy that bashes his face
Speaker 2: with a hammer to look Max Andrew Tait and what
Speaker 2: I think. They're like the counter to fourth wave feminism
Speaker 2: that ultimately brought us only fan models and you know,
Speaker 2: chicks acting like Corse. They're like the counter to that
Speaker 2: with the masculinity movement, because there was a real crisis
Speaker 2: of masculinity. The agenda told us we were horrible people,
Speaker 2: and then they put in their agents right to create,
Speaker 2: to deceive a whole generation into treating women like shit.
Speaker 2: I think it's part of the greater depopulation agenda. And
Speaker 2: what I do find interesting within each one of these characters,
Speaker 2: and they're all exposing in Israel. You could throw Daan
Speaker 2: Bezarion into that one too. They're all promoted a level
Speaker 2: of degeneracy to a young generation. And there's all rumors
Speaker 2: about them being closet homosexuals. Why and what you do
Speaker 2: behind closed between you and God. Let the chips for
Speaker 2: all the may I don't judge in that way. I
Speaker 2: leave that up to God. But it's something weird that
Speaker 2: the leaders of the masculinity movement, there's rumors about them
Speaker 2: all being closeted homosexuals. And throw Elijah Shaeffer into that one.
Speaker 1: Come on, dude, they don't look straight here. Yeah, come on, dude,
Speaker 1: got the fires of hell burn them behind them. They
Speaker 1: got fucking you know.
Speaker 2: You know I found interesting. You know Dan Basarian, Yeah,
Speaker 2: there was actually images of him that were in the
Speaker 2: Epstein files.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 2: Now we could see those images without the square over
Speaker 2: them or whatever that he posted. But you're like, well,
Speaker 2: why do they even have Dan Basarian's image in the
Speaker 2: Epstein files and you know, squares over the girls that
Speaker 2: were with them, And I wonder if those girls that
Speaker 2: he were with, which are clearly prostitutes, I mean, what
Speaker 2: did this guy do to his eighty million followers. He
Speaker 2: had prostitutes, he had drugs or flying around in a plane.
Speaker 2: He sounds kind of like an Epsteinist type character, maybe
Speaker 2: less pedophilia, but maybe that black Black Line network. But
Speaker 2: you know, he was I think dealing with chicks that
Speaker 2: were in the Epstein piles.
Speaker 1: Mm hm.
Speaker 2: So you know, oh, but he talks crap about Israel.
Speaker 2: But then when you realize that's exactly what they want,
Speaker 2: You're like, Okay, he's part of the agenda.
Speaker 1: I think you're right about that, dude. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: the guys shut I mean, you saw my Oh fucking
Speaker 1: might take me a second year. Hold on one second,
Speaker 1: let me see here in the two seconds, No, I
Speaker 1: can find accident here while I'm showing it to you.
Speaker 1: Ye's go to my profile. Speaking of that, you know,
Speaker 1: I mean, first of all, somebody was just talking about
Speaker 1: in the chat. Somebody was talking about the fact that
Speaker 1: Elon was like begging to go to you know, the island,
Speaker 1: you know, to hang out with him or his brother
Speaker 1: one of them. They were like really excited, can't wait,
Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. Uh did you see that?
Speaker 2: I did not know. Oh I saw that how Elon
Speaker 2: Musk had lied about it. And then there was an
Speaker 2: email correspond and said he wanted to go to the
Speaker 2: island or what was a good night to go to
Speaker 2: the island?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 2: What is your craziest part?
Speaker 1: Yes, yes, so somebody actually reposted this. So Nick Kington
Speaker 1: posted this, right, he said, why does this signature look
Speaker 1: just like neuralink? I just flipped it upside down. It's like, well,
Speaker 1: whenever you flip it upside down, legitimately looks the exact same.
Speaker 1: It's like, legit just flip that upside down, you got
Speaker 1: the fucking it's the same. So, you know, an inversion
Speaker 1: is you know, I mean, I'm not surprised that that
Speaker 1: would be involved in doing that, but yeah, again, you
Speaker 1: know it's just like, of course the connection's there, and
Speaker 1: the way that Elon has children and wants to have children,
Speaker 1: and how he's like you can have a contractor agreement
Speaker 1: agreement with me and I'll just donate and you just
Speaker 1: have them. I just want to spread my seed. And
Speaker 1: you know, just for the listener's sake, you know, that's
Speaker 1: exactly what Epstein wanted to do. You want to spread
Speaker 1: his seed across the world. Right, for lack of better words,
Speaker 1: wasn't that the whole thing?
Speaker 2: Yeah? I mean, who knows what type of is? Like,
Speaker 2: I wonder, and this is completely conspiratorial of me. We
Speaker 2: know that there's such thing as designer babies, will know
Speaker 2: that they are messing with our genetics. I wonder if
Speaker 2: some of these people who are so obsessed with having
Speaker 2: kids are actually starting to implement some of this technology
Speaker 2: that they've cut from us with crisper I I. If
Speaker 2: you look up some of the names of Elon mus Son,
Speaker 2: they're named after warfare technology associated with the Fallen Angels.
Speaker 2: So yeah, I mean, fully just go look at listen,
Speaker 2: go look at Elon Musk's father, right, who literally own
Speaker 2: Emerald Minds in South Africa, who impregnated his fourteen year
Speaker 2: old stepdaughter the first time and then left his wife,
Speaker 2: impregnated her again at sixteen and then got married I believe.
Speaker 2: So this is a long line as grandfather was part
Speaker 2: of technocracy in Canada. Yeah, it's all.
Speaker 1: Magic authoritarian, So they put him out and that's how
Speaker 1: he ended up in South Africa doing the mining. He
Speaker 1: opened up the mining company, drilling company, whatever it was,
Speaker 1: and of course got up to the aristocratic level right
Speaker 1: and sent the son here to take over. And I
Speaker 1: think it's weird. You know, of course, you have the Nazi,
Speaker 1: the space ties, the the high technology ties with Donald Trump, Tesla,
Speaker 1: Elon Musk. You have Elon starting his company calling it Tesla.
Speaker 1: You have Warner von Braun, who is the Nazi scientist
Speaker 1: and Nazi scientist working for NASA, who pretty much started it.
Speaker 1: And he talks about a book where Elon, well, a
Speaker 1: man named Elon is going to take us to Mars
Speaker 1: and rule with a league of ten. And the room
Speaker 1: in numeral for ten is X. So it's like, dude,
Speaker 1: what kind of fucking mind loop are we in here?
Speaker 1: And I get why people think we're in a simulation,
Speaker 1: but again, this is exposure gate. The idea of exposure
Speaker 1: gate is the elites are fucking with us, and your
Speaker 1: reaction is equally as important. Now am I saying there's
Speaker 1: no channeling? Is there no way they did any kind
Speaker 1: of psychic future? Chalent? I don't know. Fuck, I'm not
Speaker 1: saying there's no possible way. But is it more likely though,
Speaker 1: that they have a multi generational plan that et setup.
Speaker 1: Probably I think that's more likely, you know. And Kyle
Speaker 1: here was saying that the EPSTEIN follows or government sieop.
Speaker 1: And that's kind of the basis of what got me
Speaker 1: into this whole exposure gate thing was this is too
Speaker 1: good to be true. There's too many typos. There's too
Speaker 1: many like just things to connect directly to certain conspiracies.
Speaker 1: And if you were going to expose all conspiracies at once,
Speaker 1: wouldn't you take the biggest one with a guy connected
Speaker 1: to everything and then in the emails use AI whatever
Speaker 1: technology you have now to create emails or adapt some
Speaker 1: of the words. But yeah, it's got typos. Let's leave
Speaker 1: it alone. We'll say it was a rendering problem whenever
Speaker 1: we trade it, you know, transferred it over. Dude, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: but I just can't look past the typos. That's what
Speaker 1: gets me the most. You have a equal sign. You
Speaker 1: type the word R A R E, and in between
Speaker 1: R and E you have a equal sign, and you
Speaker 1: do the word here in between E and R. You
Speaker 1: have what's going on here? Do you know how hard
Speaker 1: it is to type the equal sign on your keyboard
Speaker 1: whatever you're typing, you have to literally shift and then
Speaker 1: hit a button next to the backspace, so you're practically
Speaker 1: deleting it to do it, and you're still doing it
Speaker 1: that much. I'm sorry, but come on, bro, give me
Speaker 1: a break. Just that simple fact does it for me?
Speaker 1: Just that one detail for me, I would hammer on
Speaker 1: that all day and be like, Hello, what do you
Speaker 1: think this guy runs the world but he can't type.
Speaker 2: Well, I'll do one more, and I care to see
Speaker 2: what you believe about this. You know, if I was
Speaker 2: a billionaire and going over to Epstein's Island to bang
Speaker 2: little girls and little boys, the last thing I would
Speaker 2: do is have a paper trail, and in this case,
Speaker 2: a digital paper trail, yep, and to watch these people
Speaker 2: converse about these things using terms that we found out
Speaker 2: from QAnon pizza, grape, soda. I mean, there's just too
Speaker 2: many coincidences.
Speaker 1: The equals a hangover from ASCI line breaks. Prime Egan
Speaker 1: debumped that a while back. What is debunking that mean? Like?
Speaker 1: Did he just given it the reason why it's there?
Speaker 1: And then we're going to say it's defunk not to
Speaker 1: be rude about this, confused what that means, because I
Speaker 1: feel like you could offer me a reason, but it
Speaker 1: just doesn't make sense. I don't know. I mean, sure,
Speaker 1: is there some kind of rendering issue, like when they
Speaker 1: transferred it from like email the file format. That's the
Speaker 1: only thing that would make sense to me, and I
Speaker 1: would imagine that would be what they said, but old
Speaker 1: text format he explained the computer. Yeah, that's exactly what
Speaker 1: I thought. That's exactly what I thought. And I was
Speaker 1: talking to my wife about that. She was like, well,
Speaker 1: that could be possibly a reason. I was like, all right,
Speaker 1: because it is. Here's the thing. It's to and from
Speaker 1: Epstein and from other people, so it's not just him
Speaker 1: doing it. And so I could give him. I'll give
Speaker 1: him that taking a cup shout out Cakes always got
Speaker 1: the bangers right on.
Speaker 2: He does. But I also like to say this and
Speaker 2: that it's all controlled those in the government who are
Speaker 2: leading the charge to release these Epstein files. There's suspect too.
Speaker 2: I mean, look at Thomas Massey, who's literally groomed in
Speaker 2: dem La International, a Masonic boys organization named after the
Speaker 2: last Grand Mouse of the Knights Templars. You know that
Speaker 2: Albert Pike quote if it's real or not. But you know,
Speaker 2: when the people need a hero, and at this time
Speaker 2: it's really Mason. You got Roy Kanna, who's from San Francisco,
Speaker 2: and he's not getting elected without a whole bunch of
Speaker 2: silicon money and silicon backing. So once again you have
Speaker 2: two guys connected to the agenda exposing it but not
Speaker 2: really exposing it.
Speaker 1: Exactly, you know, in Tucker. And we'll get back to Tucker.
Speaker 1: Let's do that right now. He's getting investigated by the
Speaker 1: CIA quote unquote right or was it the CIA? I
Speaker 1: think right?
Speaker 2: Yeah, he said so, yeah, And.
Speaker 1: So what's funny to me about that is a week
Speaker 1: ago Trump said Trucker's not part of MAGA, he's lost
Speaker 1: his way. So we've now had a separation from MAGA
Speaker 1: with Tucker. And so if you were going to build
Speaker 1: up this Third Savior party, you would pick the guy
Speaker 1: who's calling out Shabat lu Vivitch. You picked the guy
Speaker 1: who's calling out the Zionist regime. You'd pick the guy
Speaker 1: who's the Father of America, as they call him. You'd
Speaker 1: pick the guy who's trying to save America and almost
Speaker 1: even sometimes can convince somebody like me, that he could
Speaker 1: be possibly a white hat, even though I know for
Speaker 1: a fact that there is like this other layer. I
Speaker 1: just can't quite see yet that I'm just working on
Speaker 1: getting to that he's there on right. And So with
Speaker 1: that being said, you have a Thomas Mackie and Massian Tucker.
Speaker 1: Do you think that there's a possibility that that could
Speaker 1: be a third party movement and or a new Republican
Speaker 1: movement in the future. I mean, Tucker's young, and so's Thomas.
Speaker 1: They're not like eighty year old guys. And they're already
Speaker 1: calling Tucker the father of America. And he had a
Speaker 1: close relationship with Charlie, who people already said was going
Speaker 1: to be headed towards the presidency. So I wonder, with
Speaker 1: the grooming in mind and everything else, what do you
Speaker 1: think about that?
Speaker 2: Well, about Tucker, all you have to do because I
Speaker 2: watched that video about all the CIA is spying on
Speaker 2: me and stuff like that. But hey, listen, whenever I
Speaker 2: work for a company and I use their laptop or
Speaker 2: I use their phone, guess what they had access to
Speaker 2: all of it. So I think Tucker worked for the CIA,
Speaker 2: they have access to it.
Speaker 1: But I mean, once in the Cia always in the right, you.
Speaker 2: Know, and look at all you gotta do is look
Speaker 2: at his son, right because in that video he goes,
Speaker 2: I think government is disgusting, and he's calling out the agenda,
Speaker 2: he's calling out Trump. But his son is literally a
Speaker 2: paid liar for Peter Thiel by proxy of JD. Vance Like,
Speaker 2: straight up, So, how are you gonna say, and there is.
Speaker 1: A connection with there is a connection with deal in Tucker, correct, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's what I thought.
Speaker 2: His son, his son is the press deputy press secretary
Speaker 2: YEP for JD. Vans, which means name are at home.
Speaker 2: Let means you're the deputy press secretary of pounds here. Yeah,
Speaker 2: so it doesn't.
Speaker 1: Make holy shit and so and that's another thing. Scull
Speaker 1: them bones, scall them bones. I always hammer on this,
Speaker 1: you know. RP. Tex Mars. I think I put him
Speaker 1: up there with Bill Cooper, him, James Shelby, Downard text Mars.
Speaker 1: These are the greats. Okay, it's not the goats. Are
Speaker 1: not David Ike and Alex Jones. Okay, those guys are
Speaker 1: not the goats to this movement. The go to this
Speaker 1: movement or guys like that who point out these things
Speaker 1: and then die in twenty years later they come to fruition.
Speaker 1: That's real shit, because no matter how controlled you are,
Speaker 1: you can't point out a movement that's anti human if
Speaker 1: you're a part of it that well, you know what
Speaker 1: I'm saying without like, yeah, so anyway, I almost forgot
Speaker 1: where was going to that, but yeah, text Mark, what
Speaker 1: were Oh yeah, the skull and bones aspect. Yeah, JD
Speaker 1: Vance's scull of bones and there's a long history with
Speaker 1: the Nazi scull and bones in this New World Order movement.
Speaker 1: That's all I'll leave it in there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So I think what Tucker and Thomas Massey, Yeah,
Speaker 2: it does look like they're trying to start another political
Speaker 2: party because I think, like I said, Zionism needs to die.
Speaker 2: And let's not also forget that Thomas Massey has a
Speaker 2: bunch of AI tech patents. He's a former graduate of MIT,
Speaker 2: which is a feeder into Dharba, which is a feeder
Speaker 2: into the CIA. So after they use political Zionism, in
Speaker 2: my opinion, to collapse the system, I think the technocrats
Speaker 2: are going to build the new system. So I can
Speaker 2: definitely see Thomas Massey sliding into that position with Tucker Carlson.
Speaker 2: The Buildeberg, to your point, is filled with Zionists, but
Speaker 2: it's was created by an actual Nazi.
Speaker 1: By Nazis, exactly.
Speaker 2: Goes back to the Havar Agreement, same type of deal.
Speaker 2: So there's really I don't think there's any real difference
Speaker 2: between the two. They're all just different bloodlines. Perfect. So yeah,
Speaker 2: I definitely see them playing their role in destroying, destroying
Speaker 2: thesionist movement, but ultimately ushering in technocracy. However that looks.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so that third party movement man, So okay, So
Speaker 1: we have exposure game getting exposed by people who we
Speaker 1: could probably foresee being a lot of leaders in this
Speaker 1: new movement that they're trying to create. So if you
Speaker 1: want to create, I just want to break this down
Speaker 1: conceptually and try to together and try to kind of
Speaker 1: see what we're dealing with. So Alex Jones does his
Speaker 1: job really building up the conspiracy movement. Joe Rogan does
Speaker 1: a good job kind of building up this this this
Speaker 1: young male class of people, guys like you know, a
Speaker 1: certain any drange, getting them into like you know, working out,
Speaker 1: like just a certain kind of lifestyle, really changing their
Speaker 1: lives to the good. But then you have a shift,
Speaker 1: right with the MAGA movement and kind of pushes them
Speaker 1: into there. It works perfectly, but you also simultaneously have people,
Speaker 1: you know, kind of rising up that are a little
Speaker 1: bit deeper on the fringe side, Tucker crossing these Fox
Speaker 1: around this time, Ian Carroll Pop's out of the nowhere.
Speaker 1: Canice Owens goes full fucking full on retard rights the
Speaker 1: quote tropic thunder, and so you know, as you go,
Speaker 1: you're like, Okay, that's that's where they're building to. And
Speaker 1: then now those people that are exposing this are building
Speaker 1: a new movement, and this new movement we are seeing
Speaker 1: leaders emerge a Thomas Massey, a Tucker Carlson, people like that,
Speaker 1: and anybody who joins them and calls out, you know whatever.
Speaker 1: So I see, and then you have even the radical
Speaker 1: side of this movement already being created that it can
Speaker 1: kind of really usher it in, you know, with the
Speaker 1: accelerationist aspect, through the people like Guenttes who are capturing
Speaker 1: the younger people, right, the younger generation even than us.
Speaker 1: And so I think that's genius, man. I think they
Speaker 1: really are doing a good job. They're capturing a whole
Speaker 1: generation of people and they're generating them over and once
Speaker 1: David Ellison buys the media's and we don't have this
Speaker 1: weird leftist thing going on still in the media, and
Speaker 1: it's full propaganda from the right and from this new movement.
Speaker 1: When the third party comes out, you're gonna think, oh,
Speaker 1: this new movement, like you know, is separate from that.
Speaker 1: It's not right. So that's how it's going to come out.
Speaker 1: I think that's the point of Exposure Gate, is they're
Speaker 1: building up to this mass here we are now expose
Speaker 1: it all and then run to your saviors.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and that actually kicked off, I believe with QAnon,
Speaker 2: which was an intelligence operation. And you know what's really interesting,
Speaker 2: And hey, listen, I love Sammy t I think he's
Speaker 2: actually one of the good guys, despite being in a
Speaker 2: cess pool of you know whatever in the water, right,
Speaker 2: But that's why I found interesting. So remember a few
Speaker 2: years ago he was on Joe Rogan and that clip
Speaker 2: of him exposing uh, you know, the illegal immigration riots
Speaker 2: went viral. Right, yeah, oh my god, he predicted this.
Speaker 2: Well you know who he said told him this.
Speaker 1: I know mel Ka and she's who funded.
Speaker 2: By the wellness company. Yes, ties with exactly. That's what
Speaker 2: I'm saying there's many levels of it. Why I think
Speaker 2: Sammy t He is a good guy. They have their
Speaker 2: operatives in there and they'll go on shows and stuff
Speaker 2: like that and say I'm like, oh man, that's really cool.
Speaker 2: Yea hey, it will happen. Well, where did mel K
Speaker 2: found out? How how did mel K find out? General
Speaker 2: Michael Flynn? Exactly? Ander who by the way, and that's
Speaker 2: another person who Candice routinely promotes is General Michael Flynn
Speaker 2: and his entire career pretty much was spent at Fort
Speaker 2: Bragg and in intelligence, and that's exactly where the SIOP
Speaker 2: school is. So to me, it's absolutely exactly. I'm still
Speaker 2: trying to figure out why people for the most part, Uh,
Speaker 2: maybe they don't have the time, maybe they're looking at
Speaker 2: the wrong spots. How they can't put this all together
Speaker 2: about the mainstream alterntive media because to me, it's as
Speaker 2: clear as day.
Speaker 1: Well there's some context together, and some people may miss
Speaker 1: this or miss that. Like for me, I'm just a
Speaker 1: very analytical person. Like I wouldn't call myself like a
Speaker 1: lot of people go all the way like I'm just
Speaker 1: autistic with it. It's like I wouldn't say that, but
Speaker 1: I'm very analytical. I like to assess things like a conception.
Speaker 1: I'm very I'm very quick to understand a concept. You
Speaker 1: can give me a few details, and I can really
Speaker 1: understand a concept almost ninety eight percent accurate with anything.
Speaker 1: So then whenever I transfer that kind of talent to
Speaker 1: like conspiracy world, where you don't have eighty percent of
Speaker 1: the information, you only have a few pieces, but you
Speaker 1: can put it together and conceptualize it in a way
Speaker 1: where I've just noticed the more information I get, the
Speaker 1: more right I was when I instinctually thought it was
Speaker 1: at the very beginning of this journey. So I happen
Speaker 1: to have that going on for me. But other than that, yeah,
Speaker 1: I think that people miss context. One thing of context
Speaker 1: people might miss is Sean Ryan when he was on
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan, he talked about of course he gave good
Speaker 1: context that you could help put a piece of puzzle together.
Speaker 1: You have to listen to the controlled ops to get
Speaker 1: the right piece of information you do. That's where you
Speaker 1: get your information from. You can't say, well, that guy's
Speaker 1: controlled out fuck them. No, you're gonna get a lot
Speaker 1: of truth out of that guy. Bro.
Speaker 2: That's why I go on social media to find video
Speaker 2: to have ideas and what to act. So whatever they say,
Speaker 2: I'll make a video on the opposite, it's detective work.
Speaker 1: It's detective work. So Sean Ryan goes on there and
Speaker 1: he's talking about like he's like, you know, he's asking Joe.
Speaker 1: He's like, he's like, what do you do? You know,
Speaker 1: He's like, how do you deal with it? You know,
Speaker 1: when you're dealing with people that may come on here
Speaker 1: and try to push a certain narrative subtly, try to
Speaker 1: maybe give you information so you'll repeat it, like Sam
Speaker 1: and Emma Melka and so he said he was describing
Speaker 1: because he's from the CIA, so he would know. And
Speaker 1: he was describing how you know, somebody could go through
Speaker 1: a three hour interview and only say a certain sentence,
Speaker 1: maybe two sentences that he needed to say, and the
Speaker 1: rest of it could just be whatever, But those two
Speaker 1: sentences are like what he needed to deliver the information
Speaker 1: and it somehow stands out in the way where you
Speaker 1: remember it because it usually is pretty important and they'll
Speaker 1: frame it in a way where it sits in your
Speaker 1: head and it's not something you miss. Right. Well, dude,
Speaker 1: I don't know, man, that seems a lot like what
Speaker 1: the fuck's going on with people like Sam Tripley or whatever,
Speaker 1: where it's like, yeah, he's probably not control, but he's
Speaker 1: an assess fit. He doesn't really attention to who he's
Speaker 1: talking to necessarily. He'll talk to anybody. He'll talk to
Speaker 1: a gnostic one day and a Jesus guy the next,
Speaker 1: and you don't really know where you know how he
Speaker 1: feels because he just kind of lets everybody come on.
Speaker 1: So it's very good to do that, but also it's
Speaker 1: like that opens you up for a lot of fuckery
Speaker 1: that Sean Ryan was describing, where you've got one and
Speaker 1: you could boil it down to a person. You know,
Speaker 1: you could have ten people that are cool, but then
Speaker 1: one guy comes on. It might be the most banger show,
Speaker 1: but he's got a lot of fucking propaganda and a
Speaker 1: lot of psyop going on, you see what I mean?
Speaker 1: And so yeah, and like mel Kay delivers a banger
Speaker 1: show and something like that would be a banger show,
Speaker 1: and then in.
Speaker 2: That you get a lot of see what I mean, dude,
Speaker 2: I remember when I saw that clip and everybody I
Speaker 2: was like mel Kay told me im like wait a minute,
Speaker 2: Melky's party, QAnon, Well come on and Sammy T should
Speaker 2: know this. Yeah, like and yeah, I think I don't
Speaker 2: want to throw too much shade on Sammy T, although
Speaker 2: it is a little annoying. Yeah, when he just has
Speaker 2: a bunch of people Jesus some gnostic ninja. Yeah, and
Speaker 2: while claiming to be a Christian, that's for me, that's
Speaker 2: what really, that's why is.
Speaker 1: He And I don't want to be over I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna be over analytical here, but this is something a
Speaker 1: question that hits my brain a lot. When I'm spending
Speaker 1: so much time talking about the rise of Christian nationalism
Speaker 1: and the mainstream alternative media as a movement to possibly
Speaker 1: control people and move them in And when there's a
Speaker 1: guy who I love, great guy, but he's having people
Speaker 1: on mixed messages being given a lot of new age
Speaker 1: messages being given. And I've always always I'm like, beware
Speaker 1: of the new age shit, because that's how they get you. See.
Speaker 1: The thing is about the elites is they want to
Speaker 1: funnel you into their ideologies. And for a long time,
Speaker 1: like I listened to Sam Tripley for a while, and
Speaker 1: I stopped listening to him whenever I got deep into
Speaker 1: my conspiracy rabbit holes back in twenty twenty, I stopped
Speaker 1: listening to him because I realized, I said, there's people
Speaker 1: coming on here talking about the demiurge, talking about all
Speaker 1: these things. I was like, they're trying to funnel the
Speaker 1: conspiracy purists into the ideologies of the elites. I didn't
Speaker 1: know Sam Tripley. I was knowing if he was doing
Speaker 1: it on purpose, but I knew that that was what
Speaker 1: was going on. Going back to that, I think it
Speaker 1: is what's going on. And so knowing that, it's like,
Speaker 1: beware the philosophy's you intake whenever you're in this conspiracy
Speaker 1: world because aliens, New Age meditation, channeling crystals, that's all
Speaker 1: the leads practice and it might seem great, but it
Speaker 1: comes with the other shit that they do, right, So beware,
Speaker 1: and that's what.
Speaker 2: Yeah, shout out to see Bil shut but shout out everybody, but.
Speaker 1: Shout out the whole chat. I'm sorry, I haven't shouted
Speaker 1: them out yet, have I shout out everybody?
Speaker 2: You know, you do make a good point. And like
Speaker 2: I said, I don't mean to pile on Sam Tripley here,
Speaker 2: but for me, and I don't mean to pile on
Speaker 2: people who believe narcissism, right, if that's what you're exposed to, Hey,
Speaker 2: look it, as long as you don't hurt anybody, you
Speaker 2: have the right to believe whatever you want. But once
Speaker 2: you proclaim to be a Christian, once you proclaim to
Speaker 2: have a relationship with Jesus and the Most High God,
Speaker 2: then you're operating in the holy space, right, then that
Speaker 2: Holy Spirit should be telling Sam, I'm not going to
Speaker 2: push this gnostic stuff on my entire group of people
Speaker 2: because that is in direct conflict with what I believe.
Speaker 2: And ultimately, yeah, that's the main truth, right, I think
Speaker 2: the main truth that everybody's trying to dive down to
Speaker 2: get to.
Speaker 1: And it's just there's got to be a point where
Speaker 1: there's got to be a point where you're not spreading
Speaker 1: more confusion. There's got to be a point where you're
Speaker 1: spreading more of a of a consistent message. There's got
Speaker 1: to be a point where you're not just the guy
Speaker 1: on the fence, especially if we're it's something that's a
Speaker 1: major battle for good and evil and it's a spiritual
Speaker 1: battle and it's something that we really need to get
Speaker 1: a hold of. Then I mean, we got to get
Speaker 1: off the fence. That's all I'm saying. So there's got
Speaker 1: to be a point where we get off the fence.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that we one hundred percent de vote
Speaker 1: ourselves to one hundred percent of crime, but it really
Speaker 1: just takes walking into just the general message of that.
Speaker 1: You don't even have to dive into that, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean. But it's like, okay, well, I'm not
Speaker 1: going to push the idea of like or at least,
Speaker 1: if we do talk about it, push back a little
Speaker 1: with the nuance of like, well, what do you think
Speaker 1: about the fact that a lot of people feel this
Speaker 1: way about what you're saying at least a little bit
Speaker 1: of that, Like, what do you think about the fact
Speaker 1: that people feel this way about that? Which, I know,
Speaker 1: what's hard to do, man, because you don't want to
Speaker 1: make people uncomfortable. So hey, you know, I get it.
Speaker 1: It's a hard line. I know. People though also that
Speaker 1: like stopped listening to shit because they got more Christian.
Speaker 2: I stopped listening to Sam triple a big time. Like
Speaker 2: I said, I mean, there's a few shows that I'll
Speaker 2: watch that seem interesting, but you know, also I have to,
Speaker 2: you know, take the medicine that I prescribe to everybody. Yeah,
Speaker 2: and if you look at it objectively, you know, this
Speaker 2: whole changing to Christianity, his ties to Rogan and I
Speaker 2: get we all have certain blind stops, but I don't know,
Speaker 2: but hey, I ultimately and then ago, he goes back
Speaker 2: and forth a lot, right, So he'll say something I
Speaker 2: really agree with, like oh, it's about you know, manufacturing
Speaker 2: of prophecy, and he'll slip that in there. But then
Speaker 2: his entire show with guests is just furthering more fed
Speaker 2: slot or intelligence slop, mainstream alternative media slop.
Speaker 1: Yes, uh, you know that's what. That's what. Yeah, there's
Speaker 1: got like I said, yeah, there's got to be a
Speaker 1: point where were united on not spreading confusion at a
Speaker 1: certain point in knowing what our enemy is, right, and
Speaker 1: there's a certain point where you got to know if
Speaker 1: you're promoting your enemy or your friend, et cetera, et cetera,
Speaker 1: et cetera. We can't talk to exposure, to GET and
Speaker 1: the alternative media without talking a little bit about the
Speaker 1: same t you know what I'm saying. So yeah, right on, no, no,
Speaker 1: no hate, I love, but yeah, and you know, just
Speaker 1: an objective question was all that you know, but yeah,
Speaker 1: I think that you know, Uh, there's a large asymmetrical
Speaker 1: network of peers that are interacting and working throughout the
Speaker 1: network of listeners listenership, and uh, we're kind of I
Speaker 1: think we're seeing it, you know what I mean. And
Speaker 1: and I come from this as a year of the listeners. Honestly,
Speaker 1: I really do. I mean, I work and listen to
Speaker 1: shit and you know, research it on my free time.
Speaker 1: And I have been for years and decided maybe to
Speaker 1: do this. I've always wanted to do something they had
Speaker 1: to do with like talking or presenting. I've always wanted
Speaker 1: to be like a psychiatrist or a philosopher or kind
Speaker 1: of speak seminars or do things like that, like I've
Speaker 1: always liked like Alan Watts or whatever. You know, That's
Speaker 1: kind of what started my journey. So I've always been
Speaker 1: into like wanting to do something eventually like this. So
Speaker 1: it's funny how it ended up being this, But it's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean I'm objectively. Look, if you ever hear me
Speaker 1: change my messages or push any kind of shit, hold
Speaker 1: me accountable, you know what I mean, Because you know,
Speaker 1: I think that that's real. And I think that if
Speaker 1: you start with somebody who is starting organically like that,
Speaker 1: and go with them. As they grow, you're gonna get
Speaker 1: more of the real information from them, you know, if
Speaker 1: they're competent enough to present it in a way where
Speaker 1: it's good information. That's who I would listen to.
Speaker 2: Hey, I would listen to listen. There's a great passage
Speaker 2: in Galatians five, uh, when it talks about the fruits
Speaker 2: of the spirit versus the fruits of the flesh, and
Speaker 2: they're very different. And I look at somebody like, are
Speaker 2: they showing the fruits of the spirit or are they
Speaker 2: operating of the flesh? Right, And that's how I really
Speaker 2: judge influencers. So yeah, that's what I do. Who knows.
Speaker 2: There's all different levels of it, and that's actually one
Speaker 2: of the I would love to be able to make
Speaker 2: a living off of this. But I also think that's
Speaker 2: a double edged sword, because when you're dependent, as you're
Speaker 2: living for this, then you have to start pushing stuff
Speaker 2: that you might not necessarily you agree with, but just
Speaker 2: so that your customers at that point will keep on
Speaker 2: giving you their money, or they'll keep on giving you
Speaker 2: your views.
Speaker 1: Dude, look at David Wilcox, you know what I mean?
Speaker 1: That guy's Oh my god, there guy's a psycle. He'll
Speaker 1: say whatever he can is to get some money. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think there was a point where he was talking
Speaker 1: about like, I mean, dude, Jesus goes on like everybody's
Speaker 1: against it, like changing the weather outside. They're trying. They're
Speaker 1: out to get me, you know, like that kind of thing,
Speaker 1: Like you know, it's next level.
Speaker 2: Who is hey, just real quick, Tara, who is the
Speaker 2: Christian You were listening to the Christian King last night?
Speaker 2: They were all kind of mean, who's that?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Who is that?
Speaker 1: Dude? What's so funny is like we're just talking about
Speaker 1: this and Johnny Woodard posted a screenshot of like Sam
Speaker 1: blocked him. He's like Sam winning the war of ideas
Speaker 1: by blocking interns who disagree with Obviously they're probably fucking around,
Speaker 1: but that's just funny. That was on the top of
Speaker 1: the Right Openings. Uh and then uh yeah, I was
Speaker 1: actually gonna look at that for what we were just
Speaker 1: talking about whatever, But yeah, man, uh, you know, it's crazy.
Speaker 1: We'll see how it goes. I think that you know,
Speaker 1: what comes next is a little dark if people really
Speaker 1: all fall for it and there's not enough people that
Speaker 1: kind of.
Speaker 2: You know, just yeah, And if we're gonna be talking crap,
Speaker 2: I want to spread it around. I should be talking
Speaker 2: property expose. I'm very suspect of Jake Shields.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, and you brought up Dan Bilzerian earlier. These
Speaker 1: are two guys, same message, same time came out boom
Speaker 1: and the other usc guy I forgot his name. Yes, yeah, absolutely.
Speaker 1: I think that there's some weird fucking sphere of people
Speaker 1: like in that realm of celebrity that they like got
Speaker 1: a hold of. I don't know how what kind of
Speaker 1: expo they went to. I don't know if it's like
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan knows them. I don't know what's going on
Speaker 1: with that. I mean, they like guys that rub shoulders
Speaker 1: with a Joe Rogan. I don't know. But you know whatever, Well.
Speaker 2: Jake Jim Shields might just be an idiot for getting
Speaker 2: punched in the head too much. His natural default whenever
Speaker 2: anything comes out is too bad, Nazi good, too bad
Speaker 2: Nazi good. And you're like, well, you know this is
Speaker 2: lining up with manufacturing biblical prophecy. Everything that he says
Speaker 2: lines up in manufacturer biblical prophecy, and he's he is
Speaker 2: a Christian grifter without being a Christian. He has come
Speaker 2: out and said I don't believe in the Bible. He's
Speaker 2: come out and said I believe in God, but not
Speaker 2: Jesus or I won't call it Jesus, just whatever it is.
Speaker 2: But yet he still playcates to the Christian audience by
Speaker 2: pulling out Bible verses about the Jews killing Jesus and
Speaker 2: stuff like that. I'm like, wait a minute. If you
Speaker 2: don't believe in this stuff, if you believe it's made
Speaker 2: a book, why are you using this to make this
Speaker 2: an anti Jewish agenda when it should be an anti
Speaker 2: Israeli agenda. It should be an anti you know, Israeli
Speaker 2: influence in our government through APEC and stuff like that.
Speaker 2: But when you group an entire group of people together
Speaker 2: it's the Jews, Well guess what then all the Jews
Speaker 2: in America especially start piling on from all these other
Speaker 2: sides who are just trying to live right. Not The
Speaker 2: majority of Jews are not connected to the Cabal. They're
Speaker 2: just like you and I trying to make it through.
Speaker 2: But you start grouping them all together, and whether this
Speaker 2: is right or wrong, I'm not here to decide. I
Speaker 2: take nobody's side but Jesus. But the minute Jews start
Speaker 2: feeling it's unsafe here and I'm not saying that it's
Speaker 2: real anti semitsus what, but I'm just saying the minute
Speaker 2: they do and they start moving back to Israel, that's
Speaker 2: when you really have to worry about that, because that's
Speaker 2: what Prophecy says. Like when Stu Peters, who by the way,
Speaker 2: made money selling a shit coin to all his followers,
Speaker 2: you know that's pretty funny, starts calling for the mass
Speaker 2: deportation of US Jews. Do you realize that lines up
Speaker 2: exactly what's in Prophecy. And then when you look at
Speaker 2: Stuve Peter's life, the fact that he's a con artist,
Speaker 2: he's been a carnatist this entire time. He got thrown
Speaker 2: out of Minneapolis Governor's mansion for lying that he was
Speaker 2: Jonathan Taylor Thomas's cousin, and then he goes into becoming
Speaker 2: a rapper, and there's all this symbolition.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I saw that he was like a rapper.
Speaker 2: Then he tried to make it as a dog, the
Speaker 2: bounty hunter type character, and Minneapolis actually had to change
Speaker 2: laws on the books about their bounty hunters because he
Speaker 2: would dress up like a cop, tried to create a
Speaker 2: YouTube show from it, and I think the system was, like, man,
Speaker 2: we tried to get him to operate as a rapper.
Speaker 2: No one liked them. This stupid dog the bounty hunter
Speaker 2: think it was all perfect, dude, We're going to bring
Speaker 2: him over here and uh, you know, once again, there's
Speaker 2: videos of him saying that his major documentary was funded
Speaker 2: by a guy and I don't think it's a problem,
Speaker 2: but it's funded by a Jewish guy who owns a
Speaker 2: gold company. Yeah, you know, so I think it's also
Speaker 2: hypocritical when he calls out the Jews for all these
Speaker 2: things and then on the same side he starts selling
Speaker 2: shit coins of people.
Speaker 1: Yep, No, it's absolutely right, dude. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: and there's just so many people like you know, you
Speaker 1: got Jesse Michaels, right, Mitchell's Michel whatever, and he's apparently
Speaker 1: got ties with Peter Teele that dark you know journalist
Speaker 1: goes into that. But it makes sense though, because Joe
Speaker 1: Rogan so the first thing Sneako posted on that one
Speaker 1: thing whenever he had that video talking about how if
Speaker 1: AI came it was Jesus it would be just like exactly.
Speaker 1: Somebody was like, oh, this dude joined the the Church
Speaker 1: of Peter Teel or whatever, right, and so a palance here,
Speaker 1: and so of course they have a connection. So you
Speaker 1: got Jesse Mitchell, but then also like Jake Paul recently,
Speaker 1: I don't know if you saw Trump endorses him. Right. Well,
Speaker 1: this is right after this where he reclaims his Jewish lineage.
Speaker 1: He's been Christian his whole life, but his mom's side
Speaker 1: is Jewish. So he decides, which means he technically, you know,
Speaker 1: so he did the whole thing with a Chabad rabbi,
Speaker 1: so Shabbad Levivich, the whole deal. And now he's getting
Speaker 1: promoted by you know, Trump, right, So that's kind of
Speaker 1: that's kind of you know what I'm talking about, dude,
Speaker 1: where it's like, what this is the third party rights?
Speaker 1: I know, Oh, I just it just was playing.
Speaker 2: A lot of it is on us Christians. For some reason,
Speaker 2: we just wanted to look like in the world like,
Speaker 2: oh we're winning. We got another big guy on our side.
Speaker 2: Oh my gosh, he said this, he's talking about Christ
Speaker 2: And you know, I don't think we should put our
Speaker 2: faith in the world. I think we should put our
Speaker 2: faith in Jesus. We should put her faith in God
Speaker 2: and that should be enough. And regardless of what these
Speaker 2: people say or they pretend to start picking up Christianity
Speaker 2: like Tucker does despite wearing that Kabala bracelet.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well that's the thing. It's this shouldn't care exactly.
Speaker 1: It's the Babylony. It's the babylon the cult, theocracy, merge
Speaker 1: it all together. It's the tele Christian martyr. I'll see
Speaker 1: you went val Halla after I swear in on a
Speaker 1: bagava Gita. It's the Paula White like I'm channeling w
Speaker 1: I'm everywhere I walk, God walks. It's all of this.
Speaker 1: It's the I'm a Christian Catholic, but I channel things
Speaker 1: with Charlie Kirk and i astro projected in our dreams.
Speaker 1: It's all of that, see what I mean. It's everywhere.
Speaker 1: And so now we have this build up of this
Speaker 1: third party that we're kind of mentioning. I think that's
Speaker 1: the point of the exposure gate. I think that if
Speaker 1: you look at the characters, we're heading right into idiocracy.
Speaker 1: You got whatever the hell that who is the president
Speaker 1: of idiocracy? The boxer what was his name? He had
Speaker 1: the funniest name you don't remember. I assume what was
Speaker 1: the president's president Camacho Camacho man comancho. Dude, this is Camacho,
Speaker 1: Bro Jake Paul, Come on, dude, Camacho. He's trying to
Speaker 1: run for president. You got Trump behind him with the
Speaker 1: purple tie showing the uniparty, because that's really at the
Speaker 1: end of the day, that's the symbolism that matters, that
Speaker 1: purple tie. Terry Crews, Terry Crews played Terry Crew's r
Speaker 1: I p he played, Uh he played?
Speaker 2: Uh?
Speaker 1: Wait, Terry Crews played him.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I thought it was the No, it's the guy who
Speaker 1: played Terry Crews. No, it was Dwayne Elexander. Oh, President,
Speaker 1: Dwayne Alessandro Mountain, dew Hubert Camacho, that was his whole name.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but it was Terry Crews who played.
Speaker 1: It was played by Terry Crews.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, my bad. But I thought it was who's this guy? Yeah,
Speaker 1: that is his name, Terry Crews. Okay, I was thinking
Speaker 1: about the guy who played in Green Mile. Tell me
Speaker 1: why I thought that that was who the president was. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I thought it was the guy who played in Green Mile.
Speaker 1: For a minute, the dude who died, I forgot his
Speaker 1: name anyway? Hell yeah, no, yeah, Terry Crews is alive.
Speaker 2: My bad.
Speaker 1: I thought it was the guy from Green Mile who
Speaker 1: is dead. I thought that's who. But I was thinking
Speaker 1: of a slam and Salmon remember that. Yeah, he had
Speaker 1: that pink suit. It was he owned that. He was
Speaker 1: a boxer, but he owned that restaurant. And then it
Speaker 1: was like a comedy about people who worked at a
Speaker 1: restaurant and this you know that dude slam and Salmon anyway? Great? Great.
Speaker 2: I have a question, how many people do you think
Speaker 2: are still following this maggot cult? Because my algorithm it
Speaker 2: only sends me stuff opposing him, so I don't really know.
Speaker 2: But I gotta imagine when he starts rolling people out
Speaker 2: like Jake Paul, how many people are like what the fuck?
Speaker 1: Like?
Speaker 2: What is this really? What it is? Idiocracy? I mean,
Speaker 2: are are the maga faithful still put in their faith
Speaker 2: in him? Or are they slowly, you know, turning away?
Speaker 2: I think they're slowly turned away, But we'll see.
Speaker 1: I think you're right, unless you go on Facebook and
Speaker 1: go into the Christian groups and then you'll have your
Speaker 1: mind blown and you're like, oh my god, the world's hopeless. Yeah, yeah, Yeah,
Speaker 1: Michael Clark Duncan, thank you very much. Nef Gez and
Speaker 1: Craig Craig. Every time I see Craig's name, I just
Speaker 1: think of Friday. I don't know what the dealer is
Speaker 1: with that, because I see the name Craig all the time.
Speaker 2: For some years. Oh one thing I also want to
Speaker 2: talk about real quick, and maybe we'll throw in Epstein
Speaker 2: and tie it to what's the name Jake Shields. So
Speaker 2: I think they purposely released files on them with the
Speaker 2: word Goime all over the place, right, And you would think, though,
Speaker 2: if you're trying to hide his connection to Mosad into
Speaker 2: Jewish supremacy, you would keep the thousands of documents that
Speaker 2: talked about Gentiles as goime out of there. But they didn't.
Speaker 2: And what was the topic of conversation that literally kicked
Speaker 2: it off with Candice Owens when she posted good morning Goime?
Speaker 2: You know, but I was just looking on YouTube and
Speaker 2: guess who. I looked at the Jake shield podcast title
Speaker 2: and the title was it had Dan Bezaring on it.
Speaker 2: He had a couple other guys. The title was literally
Speaker 2: gome United. And once again, when you know what they're
Speaker 2: trying to do with political prophecy. Yep, that's exactly.
Speaker 1: And they to know that you need to be against
Speaker 1: the Jews. So going to it, guys, it's just going
Speaker 1: going food, going this, going that. No, exactly, dude, they're
Speaker 1: trying because Tucker Carlson know the genie. And this is
Speaker 1: what makes me sometimes think he's a white hat or
Speaker 1: he thinks he's talking to people that are just actual retards,
Speaker 1: because he says things like this, if you want to
Speaker 1: make somebody who hate somebody, you call them a hater.
Speaker 1: If you want to make somebody anti Semitic, you keep
Speaker 1: calling them anti Semitic, and you keep doing all these things,
Speaker 1: and then you make them look deeper certain you know,
Speaker 1: truths and etctera, et cetera. But he's like, this is
Speaker 1: the opposite they would want. Why would he point that out? Dude?
Speaker 1: That fucks me up. Dude, that's massive psychological warfare, because
Speaker 1: that's you see what I mean, Because it's like me
Speaker 1: sitting here, I'm like, why would you give that big
Speaker 1: of a hint. That's kind of a big hint to give,
Speaker 1: don't you think I mean? For me? I get that
Speaker 1: I knew that already, but you're spelling it out for
Speaker 1: people that probably didn't also know that, why would you
Speaker 1: do that? Really, horse to the water. Yeah, he's not
Speaker 1: leading a horse to the water to hate Jews, though,
Speaker 1: he's leading a horse to the water to but well,
Speaker 1: really just to hate Nityahu. He's forming it up as
Speaker 1: a geopolitical thing. Actually, he takes all this spirtuality out
Speaker 1: of it and says it's just crazed religious fanatic leaders
Speaker 1: who have funded him and him, and then problem will
Speaker 1: probably go away. Mostly he kind of frames it if
Speaker 1: that goes away. So actually that's the issue there, it is.
Speaker 2: I think why they use Tucker. I think there's they
Speaker 2: want to change everybody's opinion on Israel, right, and there's
Speaker 2: a large segment of the population, especially generational, that doesn't
Speaker 2: want to listen to Nick Fuentez talk the way he talks.
Speaker 2: So I think Tucker is a more melk toast version
Speaker 2: of that. Still, you know, changing public perception. And by
Speaker 2: the way, you know, as we've always talked about the
Speaker 2: actions of the Israeli government, the actions of the IDF,
Speaker 2: the actions of Apak, they're doing that too, and the
Speaker 2: fact that they're making public that goes hand in hand
Speaker 2: to facilitate all this stuff. It's like, you know, I
Speaker 2: always thought it was funny that, you know, Net and
Speaker 2: Yahoo even talked about the seven thousands of thousand dollars
Speaker 2: club publicly, that Net and Yahoo talked about how they're
Speaker 2: controlling TikTok publicly. Now, if you're trying to wage war
Speaker 2: through deception, that is the last thing, which is, by
Speaker 2: the way, besides unofficial motto, that is the last thing
Speaker 2: that you would do. But they do it. Anyways. It's
Speaker 2: clear Zay to me that they want it. They're leaving
Speaker 2: back digital breadcrumbs. And then they have all the influencers
Speaker 2: at different levels of it, right that are picking up
Speaker 2: on this stuff, and I just see it happening exactly.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you're right. I wonder if I have that video
Speaker 1: with all those influencers. It's like, why would you videotape
Speaker 1: yourself with all these influencers talking about oh I call
Speaker 1: them the woke Reich, and you know, all this stuff
Speaker 1: with all those influencers talking about how Elon's our friend.
Speaker 1: That's the exact same video, right that you were referring
Speaker 1: to with all the and then after that, everybody's talking
Speaker 1: about the seven grand that he's paying people. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: people start talking about the geo fencing program going on
Speaker 1: with Christian churches, and then all of a sudden he
Speaker 1: makes a deal with check CHQ, which is a pretty
Speaker 1: much it filters everything on X or any anti Semitic
Speaker 1: like anything. Right, So whenever people are asking, is nt
Speaker 1: Yahoo dead, It's gonna give you whever information it wants
Speaker 1: to give you because it's like filtered by check. Now
Speaker 1: he's obviously alive, but I'm just saying, for instance, you know,
Speaker 1: for anything you ask, it's like gonna filter. It's not
Speaker 1: just gonna be as honest as That's why I can't
Speaker 1: trust any of these chatbots.
Speaker 2: And I'll tell you one thing. U you know, someone
Speaker 2: wrote seven thousand equates thirty pieces of silver.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I just put that on here without you even
Speaker 1: saying that. I just was because yeah, that's what I
Speaker 1: would say, is.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but the people in the mainstream alternative media are
Speaker 2: getting paid way more like you know how rich Tucker
Speaker 2: Carlson is. I'm sure, yeah, you know how richie. And
Speaker 2: when you start diving down to his biology.
Speaker 1: Self admitted was self admitted wasp bow tie. His wife's rich,
Speaker 1: he's rich. He self admittedly his wife and him are
Speaker 1: rich grill Bridge, but go into that.
Speaker 2: His so so we all know about his father working.
Speaker 2: I believe it was a radio free America, which is
Speaker 2: the intelligence apparatus for propaganda all throughout the world. But
Speaker 2: a lot of people don't know about his mother and
Speaker 2: his biological mother, not the one that his father remarried
Speaker 2: after he got divorced. So him and Buckley come from
Speaker 2: the bloodline of Henry Miller. And he is at one
Speaker 2: point the largest landowner in America. In the early nineteen hundreds,
Speaker 2: they called him the cattle King California. And he has
Speaker 2: an interesting story that he migrated from Germany, changed his
Speaker 2: name and then was just a butcher somehow, and then
Speaker 2: somehow owned all the landing in America, or at least
Speaker 2: the largest landowners of America.
Speaker 1: Really, oh yeah, for how long? How long was he
Speaker 1: the largest landowner?
Speaker 2: And it was a long time in the early nineteen hundreds.
Speaker 1: Wow, crazy he owned. He said, my ancestors built this country.
Speaker 1: He says it all the time, like he said, I mean,
Speaker 1: and that's why I feel like he feels entitled to
Speaker 1: this new regime too. And I feel like him having
Speaker 1: the ear of Trump, We're gonna hey, we're gonna have
Speaker 1: a falling out. Now you're gonna go do the Iran War,
Speaker 1: but while you do that, we're gonna have a falling out.
Speaker 1: Perfect time for you to demonize yourself because you were
Speaker 1: going to do that always. You were always the villain.
Speaker 1: You came into this as the villain. I mean, I
Speaker 1: feel like that was always the plan. Even he doesn't
Speaker 1: mind doing the things nobody else would. He's even said,
Speaker 1: I'm willing to do the things none of these other
Speaker 1: presidents were willing to do. And that's not a good thing.
Speaker 1: He's saying that, like like people think, oh, he's tone death. No,
Speaker 1: he's telling you. This is just straight up bro, because
Speaker 1: he's just that villain's I mean.
Speaker 2: Yes, And I'll tell you one thing. Looking into his
Speaker 2: father as well, did you know he was an orphan
Speaker 2: He was raised in orphanage, then went to another Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: his dad is not anybody. So you're like, so, how
Speaker 2: did his dad, who was raised in an orphanage and
Speaker 2: went to the military school then became a gonzo journalist
Speaker 2: end up marrying one of the great great granddaughters of
Speaker 2: one of the richest people in America. And then right
Speaker 2: after that they got divorced. In fact, the mother was
Speaker 2: a bohemian and she's been described as living a bohemian lifestyle.
Speaker 1: Hold On, back up, we got it. Let's dive into
Speaker 1: this for me. Hold on. Yeah, okay, so gonzo writer,
Speaker 1: so we're talking like Hunter S. Thompson.
Speaker 2: That's what he said writing with Thompson in the very
Speaker 2: beginning his dad. Holy shit, Okay, this rich blood line.
Speaker 1: And doesn't Thompson have connections with like this whole Eli
Speaker 1: or Epstein style connection you know, yeah, I thought he did.
Speaker 2: He had connections to intelligence for sure.
Speaker 1: Okay, go ahead.
Speaker 2: So then he marries a super rich, wealthy family. They
Speaker 2: have two kids, and then they get divorced right away,
Speaker 2: and I guess the mom played zero role in raising
Speaker 2: the kids. It's almost like they were just breeding these
Speaker 2: kids for something. He then goes and marries the heiress
Speaker 2: to the Craft family, and you're like, I mean, not
Speaker 2: to be rude, but I mean, how does he go
Speaker 2: from being an orphan gonzo journalist to marrying two very
Speaker 2: important bloodlines within American history? Like, dude, it is so weird,
Speaker 2: and I just can't look past that, especially, you know,
Speaker 2: I can't. Yeah, I'm all for a saw with Paul moment.
Speaker 2: But you know what Saul did when he turned to Paul.
Speaker 2: He dedicated his life to preaching the Gospel, not becoming
Speaker 2: a major mover and shaker within the Roman government.
Speaker 1: Okay, so you're saying, Tucker Carlson's dad married the owner
Speaker 1: or somebody who's in the Craft family.
Speaker 2: Craft family.
Speaker 1: Yeah, second, okay, and then that's the owner of the Patriots, right,
Speaker 1: same family. Uh pretty sure, Robert Kraft. Yeah, it's the
Speaker 1: same he owns the Patriot. But so like that's a
Speaker 1: mega family, That's what I'm saying, that owns owns Craft
Speaker 1: owns the you know, Patriots.
Speaker 2: Big family.
Speaker 1: And then I believe, and then they have Tucker.
Speaker 2: No, no, no, Tucker was before that. So Tucker married
Speaker 2: the Miller family. So Henry Miller was the liargest landowner
Speaker 2: that migrated here from Germany and changed his name. He
Speaker 2: married and had kids with his great great great granddaughter.
Speaker 2: They had the two kids, They then get divorced, he
Speaker 2: moves on with his career and then somehow marries the
Speaker 2: Harris to the Craft Uh. Fortune.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 2: So you're like, what that's Tucker and he and he's
Speaker 2: a man of the p people and that's Tucker, that's police.
Speaker 1: Okay, okay, okay, I'm with you. So his first wife
Speaker 1: is very bohemian. That's very funny. I wonder what that means. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's probably his words, because he speaks like that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and that family was definitely, at least the power
Speaker 2: of it was located in the Central Valley and close
Speaker 2: to San Francisco, so it's a direct feeder into this
Speaker 2: type of bohemian grove, you know, gentleman's club.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, yeah, because the bohemian grove got infiltrated by political
Speaker 1: elites things like that. But originally it was like an
Speaker 1: artist kind of it used to be just it's people
Speaker 1: that were like witches covering, like you know, artist musician,
Speaker 1: like those kind of people.
Speaker 2: There's a giant gay gang bang, and then all the
Speaker 2: richest people in the world decided to move in there,
Speaker 2: and it's only partially now a gay gang bang.
Speaker 1: Yeah's thing ever seen, as Nixon says said, Yeah, yeah, dude,
Speaker 1: absolutely wild dude. So yeah, he's so his wife. So
Speaker 1: I was always wondering why his wife was so rich.
Speaker 1: So she's in the craftman, you answered my.
Speaker 2: Question, Yeah, yeah, okay, exactly. It was interesting also I
Speaker 2: grew up and I just found this out. I know
Speaker 2: two people whose parents go to Bohemian Grove. No shit, Yeah,
Speaker 2: I remember I was in college. I went to SC
Speaker 2: so there's a bunch of rich people there. And one
Speaker 2: of my really good buddies I don't want to give
Speaker 2: away his name, but his dad was the head of
Speaker 2: some studio, and I remember he used to tell me, Yeah,
Speaker 2: my dad goes to this meeting up in like the
Speaker 2: Redwood Forest in northern California every single week, and that's
Speaker 2: where they like set the agenda. I'm like, what do
Speaker 2: you mean they set the agenda. He's like, dude, that's
Speaker 2: just like we're all the most powerful people in the world,
Speaker 2: go to Bohemian go to the meet once a week
Speaker 2: a year. And then fast forward to when I started
Speaker 2: learning about conspiracies.
Speaker 1: I'm like, what, that's insane, dude.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Well, so you'd never got to talk to him,
Speaker 1: I imagine.
Speaker 2: Well, I haven't talked to him in five years when
Speaker 2: I started going down this route of conspiracy and finding
Speaker 2: the truth. That's one relationship that definitely separed. Okay, I
Speaker 2: literally haven't talked to him in five years.
Speaker 1: What you would think it would sever Yeah, ill.
Speaker 2: People like his dad a bunch of pedophiles, So I don't.
Speaker 1: Know how absolutely yeah, that's crazy. Uh wow, okay, so yeah, man,
Speaker 1: we got the full scoop on Tucker right there. Who
Speaker 1: were there any other? Because I know that you know
Speaker 1: you've done some deep dive on the alternative media. People
Speaker 1: who else? Doll we you know what are we missing here?
Speaker 1: Any context? Any connections with Intel or billionaires or the
Speaker 1: Zionists or royal kind or yeah. So I hey, I would.
Speaker 2: Look at and I'll promote him, although I don't agree
Speaker 2: with his spiritual beliefs, but I'll promote him if you
Speaker 2: ever want to dive into a seven seas his work
Speaker 2: within the the what's it called the Coulson Capital, the
Speaker 2: Wellness Company. That's what you gotta understand is it's still
Speaker 2: intelligence that's supporting all the independent media in the mainstream
Speaker 2: alternative media, and they do it by having these cutout
Speaker 2: companies like the Wellness Company that literally funds every single
Speaker 2: influencer I mean I should say everyone, but ninety percent
Speaker 2: of the influencers or you know, personalities that you like
Speaker 2: in the truth movement, and then you come to find
Speaker 2: out that like the CEO used to work at DARPA.
Speaker 2: You know, the owner of Coulson Capital, the parent company
Speaker 2: has direct ties to General Michael Flynn Blackwater, And essentially
Speaker 2: that's how they supported the counter to the mainstream media
Speaker 2: while they were censoring them. And that's another thing. I
Speaker 2: think they censor us so the influencers can say, oh,
Speaker 2: look at their censoring media, I'm speaking too much truth. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: they're funding everything that they're doing through these you know,
Speaker 2: quasi public private comping I don't even what you call
Speaker 2: the ones company. I've never bought anything from there. That's
Speaker 2: how they fund all this stuff. Like, these people don't
Speaker 2: really care how many people they view get views, because
Speaker 2: that's not really how they're getting paid for the most part.
Speaker 2: Maybe the top people like candies and stuff like that,
Speaker 2: but the most of these smallest people, they make most
Speaker 2: of their money through ads, and so they can go
Speaker 2: and censor them, and they can use that as a
Speaker 2: talking point on why the systems against them. But I
Speaker 2: always say, judge them by their fruits, and if they're
Speaker 2: talking points a line up with biblical prophecy in any way,
Speaker 2: I think you should be suspect of them.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah. Seven Seeds. We've had him on. He's great,
Speaker 1: he had a great Ian Carroll. I was just looking
Speaker 1: through some of the bookmarks I had from him. I've
Speaker 1: had so many dudecause he's had really seven seeds got
Speaker 1: to follow great great faults on and X mostly is
Speaker 1: where he kind of does all his work. But I mean, yeah, dude,
Speaker 1: he's got a whole deep dive. You can see on
Speaker 1: Ian Carroll's connection with the Michael Flynn well in this
Speaker 1: company H Prince, which is connected with like the whole
Speaker 1: fucking uh military Industrial Complex, et cetera, a few technologies, Israel,
Speaker 1: all of it. So yeah, definitely that you know, he
Speaker 1: even gets into the whole RFK and manaha and everything.
Speaker 1: So yeah, man uh seventeen is a great follow and
Speaker 1: he fucking backs it up with the crazy webs. Have
Speaker 1: you ever used any of those notes apps and ship
Speaker 1: that people use.
Speaker 2: Bro, I can barely turn on my computer.
Speaker 1: I cannot use those, dude, I'm like.
Speaker 2: And also, if you ever want to know who they're
Speaker 2: going to target and kill, it's those who can't use technology,
Speaker 2: which is old people and me and I haven't wonder
Speaker 2: about that. It's like this new system that they want
Speaker 2: to usher in. That's so it's driven by technology, like
Speaker 2: the people, there's some people who aren't good at it,
Speaker 2: especially generationally, and I wonder what they're gonna do with
Speaker 2: these people, and I think they're gonna kill them.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, a big part of this whole thing, you know,
Speaker 1: that you know, we haven't really touched on too much,
Speaker 1: is that all of this is a honeypot right as well.
Speaker 1: It's not just about leading people in, it's also about
Speaker 1: radicalizing certain people into antisemitism. It's that way one you
Speaker 1: can drive people Israel, but also that way if you
Speaker 1: did have some kind of internment camp plan, if you
Speaker 1: did you know, say the Canary Mission was something that
Speaker 1: came to fruition where they took the list that they
Speaker 1: had and they actually did something about it. And or
Speaker 1: the Esther Project Esther, which we can just show both
Speaker 1: of these just so people know what the hell I'm
Speaker 1: talking about making things up here. These are both real
Speaker 1: initiatives that Israel gave the Trump administration oops that they
Speaker 1: gave the Trump administration to do or America.
Speaker 2: And I think there's also like spiritual implication and it's
Speaker 2: not just you know, the Jews they want you hating
Speaker 2: everybody there are a race wars. I don't know if
Speaker 2: you saw this. And then I want to ask Steven,
Speaker 2: who is friggin Jill Belly whatever his name is on
Speaker 2: one of the comments. But did you see yesterday it
Speaker 2: was all over social media that guy Joker Waffen. No
Speaker 2: I missed that, But you know what I'm talking about, right, No,
Speaker 2: I mean.
Speaker 1: All I've seen is that guy that is exposing with
Speaker 1: the IDF locations are so he's like saying target this
Speaker 1: target this t I ran on social media. His names like, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't know if you've seen him, but we can
Speaker 1: get into him a little bit too, because yeah, I
Speaker 1: forgot about that.
Speaker 2: Go ahead, Yeah, But I mean Jake Paulus had this
Speaker 2: guy in there. They essentially made this boxing match, right,
Speaker 2: and of course it was Aiden Ross, a Jewish guy,
Speaker 2: and it's so stereotypical. I mean, just for the promotion,
Speaker 2: he wore a yamec on his head and the fight
Speaker 2: was against this guy named Joker Waffen who dresses up
Speaker 2: like a clown, goes on the internet and there's some
Speaker 2: type of program where you can like link up with
Speaker 2: random strangers and then he just starts saying all these
Speaker 2: racist things towards you know, black people, Jews and all
Speaker 2: that type of stuff. And then they had him fighting
Speaker 2: this other black guy who was an idiot, and there
Speaker 2: was a picture of all three of them, this one
Speaker 2: guy with doing a sighail the other guy's been a
Speaker 2: stupid black dude with this Jewish guy with yamaka on
Speaker 2: his head behind it. And I hate using these words.
Speaker 2: I hate using these terms because I don't think anybody should.
Speaker 2: But I mean, if there was ever a definition of
Speaker 2: boys slop, this was it. And who was humili and
Speaker 2: who was pushing this Jake Shields, right, dude, And you're
Speaker 2: just like, that's what is this stupid? And he might
Speaker 2: be he might be this stupid and I'm not afraid
Speaker 2: of him. I'm never gonna see him. I would ever
Speaker 2: be afraid of him. But he is stupid, like dumb.
Speaker 2: But you know what I'm saying, it's just all the inconsistencies.
Speaker 1: To me, No exactly, yeah, and uh you know, not
Speaker 1: top a round two round but too much. But you know,
Speaker 1: like that Jake Lane guy, Okay, he's a magian influencer.
Speaker 1: Jake Lang he was you know, going to this he was,
Speaker 1: uh yeah, he's kissing the wall. But he was calling
Speaker 1: for a crusade against Muslims. He was the guy that
Speaker 1: was standing out there with the loud you know, air horn,
Speaker 1: eating bacon and putting bacon on the Quran. Uh. He was,
Speaker 1: you know, doing all kinds of ship. It was just
Speaker 1: very just just disgraceful, just disgusting, disgraceful, all of it.
Speaker 1: So he gets caught. He's over here trying to solicit
Speaker 1: a fifteen year old girl and gets caught from one
Speaker 1: of these uh lane, Yes, and he gets caught from
Speaker 1: one of these uh you know steing operations on social media, Yes, dude.
Speaker 1: And so these are the type of people right operating
Speaker 1: with the we have operating working for Israel, right and
Speaker 1: also on the MAGA side, that is, you know, pushing
Speaker 1: this whole crusade, et cetera. So also, just to cover
Speaker 1: my bases with earlier, the Canary Mission here is a
Speaker 1: doxing website. Canary Mission is an anonymously run doxing website.
Speaker 1: It was established in twenty fourteen and it's for personal
Speaker 1: information of individuals. It deems to be anti Israel or
Speaker 1: anti Semitic, and so you see there it's anti Israel
Speaker 1: primarily targeting students and professors at North America universities. Now,
Speaker 1: the site has been described as a blacklist and a
Speaker 1: criticized for weaponizing accusations of anti Semitism. I think that,
Speaker 1: you know, when you put all this together, is one
Speaker 1: big picture with the DHS buying all these warehouses, making
Speaker 1: sure they have infirmaries in them for if people were sick,
Speaker 1: quote unquote right. I don't know, man, It just reminds
Speaker 1: me of the you know, Nazi Germany Gulag shit as
Speaker 1: well Project Deester. This was like a simultaneous thing. Maybe not.
Speaker 1: This was the newer rendition of Canary Emission Heritage Foundation,
Speaker 1: which is the right wing Israeli ran think tank and
Speaker 1: lobbyist arm of DC where they were trying to suppress
Speaker 1: pro Palestinian protests, etc. Anything they classified as anti Semitic,
Speaker 1: which of course we saw earlier is anti Israel. So
Speaker 1: we're on a list. My point is it's a honeypot,
Speaker 1: these guys that we're looking at, these alternative media And
Speaker 1: the point in saying all that is these alternative media
Speaker 1: people who are leading us into oh, you're just goy
Speaker 1: slop and you're just doing this, You're getting fucking blacklisted. Bro.
Speaker 1: Every time you like that video, every time you save
Speaker 1: that video, every time you hate on him, you're getting
Speaker 1: put on a list of like, Okay, this person's cool
Speaker 1: for now, at least for now, and then you're getting
Speaker 1: put on a list of this person needs to be
Speaker 1: watched at all time. That's real, That is not bake.
Speaker 2: I'm with you. I think it goes back to the
Speaker 2: sentient world simulation. I think they're harvesting all of our
Speaker 2: data from these third party data brokers to uploaded into
Speaker 2: their simulated world of America where they then test syops
Speaker 2: on us. To your point, that's a honeypot. All of
Speaker 2: what we talked about before, all of X is a
Speaker 2: honey pot. All this place where I get talk in
Speaker 2: freedom and no Jewish control over X. Meanwhile, Larry Elson
Speaker 2: literally owns part of X. Yeah, and once again, are
Speaker 2: the mainstream alternative people stupid? Because that all that took
Speaker 2: was a five minute Google search on who owns X?
Speaker 2: Or are they pushing the agenda? And I don't think
Speaker 2: they're idiots. I think they're pushing an agenda or or
Speaker 2: they're doing it for the bag.
Speaker 1: Yep so netfunder. Just while we're right next to what
Speaker 1: I was saying about the whole camp situation and the
Speaker 1: whole weird situation. Netfunder sent me an email earlier today
Speaker 1: shout out nev. I did email you back. Hopefully didn't
Speaker 1: go to spam, so you can check that. But here
Speaker 1: we go. I'll put this up. He sent me a
Speaker 1: video in Dallas. There was this odd event that took
Speaker 1: place in the thirteenth so two days ago. Check this out.
Speaker 1: Tell me if you can hear it? All right? You
Speaker 1: can't hear you?
Speaker 2: No, I can't hear it.
Speaker 1: On one second. Oh, I know why because I didn't
Speaker 1: put this ound on it. Usually I do right away,
Speaker 1: but I wasn't planning on doing a video of that screen.
Speaker 1: So on one sec.
Speaker 2: All right, that's what he said. He what a Sickoh
Speaker 2: real quickly? Not just go ahead a jeez. Mac said
Speaker 2: he texted and said he had to wait until she
Speaker 2: was sixteen.
Speaker 1: Who said that?
Speaker 2: That guy Jake Laying?
Speaker 1: Really what the fuck? Oh yeah, you're fifteen. I gotta
Speaker 1: wait till you're sixteen?
Speaker 2: Man, that's not how old is he?
Speaker 1: Oh, dude, he's likely. He looks like he's in his
Speaker 1: mid to late twenties. Yeah, no, he's yeah close to thirty. Yeah, definitely,
Speaker 1: maybe over thirty. Yeah, I mean the guy looks like
Speaker 1: he's got a receding hairliner.
Speaker 3: Damn.
Speaker 2: What's wrong with people? Okay?
Speaker 1: I mean I can name a few things. You know,
Speaker 1: you go to the wall. You know, you gotta say
Speaker 1: you got to make a couple of deals. You know,
Speaker 1: you got to grease a couple of palms. Maybe you know,
Speaker 1: do worse than that. All right, check this out. Tell
Speaker 1: me if you could hear it though, Yeah, okay, I
Speaker 1: can't hear it.
Speaker 2: Can you know?
Speaker 1: Oh that's you can't hear it?
Speaker 2: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Fuck why it's so weird? It's got the Okay, well,
Speaker 1: let's fucking know. Okay, there was a there was a
Speaker 1: drill ranted a walmlet. It was a drill in case
Speaker 1: like an emergency happened. We're gonna get you guys, you know,
Speaker 1: set up medical all these things, and you know, the
Speaker 1: whole long trope of BENI camps in walmarts being blacked out,
Speaker 1: gates put around them, turned into a camp. So it's
Speaker 1: very odd that, you know, that's kind of going on
Speaker 1: in Dallas, especially because we talked about the FIFA game
Speaker 1: that's going on in the fourth in Dallas.
Speaker 2: Oh what a great place to have it though, right
Speaker 2: on the border. Well yeah, and you can then blame
Speaker 2: the weak border for allowing you know, Israeli and Islamis
Speaker 2: coming through probably wearing a property of all the sweatshirt. Uh,
Speaker 2: you know, that's the perfect place to have it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they were handing out free food, sayting it was
Speaker 1: a practice. The thing is like, you know, the synagogue
Speaker 1: just had a drill two three weeks ago. You know,
Speaker 1: they had a drill the day of nine to eleven,
Speaker 1: so they can mitigate the fucking losses because thousands of
Speaker 1: people died that you know what I'm saying. They have
Speaker 1: drills all the time, and they're preparing for things. They
Speaker 1: have simulations for things before they do them, like for instance,
Speaker 1: for COVID, right before COVID, you had Bill Gates right
Speaker 1: before a lot of things. I mean, it's just it's
Speaker 1: it's a known thing that this is what they do,
Speaker 1: which makes sense if you were going to do something
Speaker 1: like this and you wanted to make sure it didn't
Speaker 1: get too out of hand, this is what you do,
Speaker 1: and of course you do it regularly enough that it's
Speaker 1: not suspect.
Speaker 2: I mean, this is how real are a lot of
Speaker 2: these videos that we see though, I mean, at this point,
Speaker 2: maybe that's the point. How much of it really is
Speaker 2: just AI slop? I mean I don't know.
Speaker 1: Right, I mean, while guy holding his phone, you know,
Speaker 1: taking a selfie video of something I can trust a
Speaker 1: little bit more than you know, just a uncontextual video
Speaker 1: of like a crowd of people that they say they're
Speaker 1: starving and they go they're starving in Gaza and then
Speaker 1: there's just crowds of people that look like like the
Speaker 1: War of Z or the you know, you know, the
Speaker 1: Z War or whatever it was with Brad Pitt with
Speaker 1: all the zombies. It's like, all right, is this real?
Speaker 1: Like what the fuck am I looking at here? Right?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's crazy. Let me see. Speaking of that, there
Speaker 1: was this ah, I don't think I had it shit, Okay,
Speaker 1: well whatever. There's a dude who lives right by a
Speaker 1: base I believe in Missouri and he was just there
Speaker 1: was just drill sirens going off and he was like,
Speaker 1: this is not normal. He's like, I've been living here
Speaker 1: in fifteen years and it's just like they don't do
Speaker 1: this shit. So so yeah, there's some odd shit going on, man,
Speaker 1: very crazy. We'll see how it goes. You know, we've
Speaker 1: talked agnauseium about the war, what might come, what's going on.
Speaker 1: It's on the ground whether or not that happens. Brian
Speaker 1: Dawson seems to think that that's not going to go down.
Speaker 1: I think that, you know, we'll see if they do
Speaker 1: get there. It's clearly a suicide mission in order to
Speaker 1: sacrificial lambs, to get us over there with some real numbers.
Speaker 2: Yeah, what do you what do you think? Well, you know,
Speaker 2: I thought about this. I wonder if we could see
Speaker 2: this war stop and then pick back up a little bit.
Speaker 2: I wonder if they come to some type of agreement
Speaker 2: truce after they destroyed the Dome of the Rock, so
Speaker 2: they could start rebuilding that third Temple. And just imagine
Speaker 2: if you're just an American citizen, you know, you know
Speaker 2: that they're trying to manufacture biblical prophecy. Tucker Carlson has
Speaker 2: come out and said, this is exactly what they're doing
Speaker 2: with Shabad Lubitch, and they have this truce, they actually
Speaker 2: do do it. They're building this up, and then Donald
Speaker 2: Trump returns to politics within America. I shouldn't say returns,
Speaker 2: but you know, it kind of seems like they returned
Speaker 2: to handling domestic stuff with the Zyocartel intact operating with impunity.
Speaker 2: To me, that is when we were really going to
Speaker 2: start seeing this resentment just percolate and percolate and percolate.
Speaker 2: You might see them building this, you know temple, some
Speaker 2: more horrific stuff will be going on in Gaza, all
Speaker 2: that type of stuff, And I think that that is
Speaker 2: what's ultimately is going to turn everybody against Israel because remember,
Speaker 2: in this end time scenario, even the American people or
Speaker 2: the American government, should I say, uh, turn on then
Speaker 2: again is America Even in revelations there's also discussions about that,
Speaker 2: but there's people.
Speaker 1: There's people that say that America has to be Babylon.
Speaker 1: So it could go all kinds of either way. Right,
Speaker 1: There's a lot of debates on that particular aspect of it,
Speaker 1: for sure.
Speaker 2: Yeah, But I think if it does end in the
Speaker 2: next two or three weeks, then it's going to pick
Speaker 2: back up, and that's whatever. The next time it picks
Speaker 2: back up, that will be when it's all on Israel.
Speaker 2: That's when they will have lost all public support that's
Speaker 2: when all countries will no longer because you can't put
Speaker 2: the tooth back into toothpaste. Like the Israeli government's name
Speaker 2: is dog shit with the people in every single country
Speaker 2: absolutely unless you are Heart and Zionus or you know,
Speaker 2: whatever you want to call yourself. But there's no putting
Speaker 2: that back in the tube. So yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 2: You know, it's crazy.
Speaker 1: Well, we're gonna get a little bit deeper into the
Speaker 1: words stuff. There's a couple of breaking news things going
Speaker 1: on here. Look at that. We got live breaking news
Speaker 1: right here. That's why you got to follow me on X. Dude,
Speaker 1: I'm telling you right now, sixty agenda at sixty agenda
Speaker 1: on X. You follow me there, do I'm telling you, bro,
Speaker 1: I get shit right when it happens. Hot off the
Speaker 1: fucking shit. And I'm looking up to see if there's
Speaker 1: any articles online, and there's none, so you know, I
Speaker 1: can't even verify it yet, but I'm sure you know
Speaker 1: usually it gets verified a little later. It's kind of crazy.
Speaker 1: But first off, before we get off of the topic
Speaker 1: of the day, the last analogy while we're on analogies,
Speaker 1: I want to give is right now, you have a
Speaker 1: large awakening going on because as we talked about, the
Speaker 1: conspiracies are going mainstream, right, and as it happens, I
Speaker 1: liken it to people getting off of an airplane. Right,
Speaker 1: You've got people standing with their signs up, you know,
Speaker 1: and imagine like you know Ben, you know, Ben's getting
Speaker 1: off the airplane, right and Ben, you know, he's walking
Speaker 1: towards all these cab drivers and they all got the
Speaker 1: Bend name, you know, and all these people up front
Speaker 1: are the Fuenttes, the injur Tate, the Joe Rogan's, and
Speaker 1: then back there you know you might find you know,
Speaker 1: that's the guy that's supposed to take you home. These
Speaker 1: people are gonna take you and they're gonna take you
Speaker 1: to the throw you in the trunk. They're gonna take
Speaker 1: you to the river, and you're gonna be dead right,
Speaker 1: You're they're taking you to slaughter. And the people in
Speaker 1: the back, they're really supposed to take you home, you
Speaker 1: ain't seeing them. And that's what I liken to this
Speaker 1: great awakening that's going on right now in this exposure gate.
Speaker 1: They want to saturated with people you can't see who
Speaker 1: the real you know you just got, you know, and
Speaker 1: you can like in that you know, all types of
Speaker 1: different people will take you all types of different places.
Speaker 1: One person might take you over, you know, to the bar.
Speaker 1: You may go do some cocaine down in the alley somewhere.
Speaker 1: You may go get killed with one of them, Like
Speaker 1: everybody's going something. But the ones that are taking you home,
Speaker 1: they're hard to find because they're just in the fucking
Speaker 1: sea of filth. Right, And so that's what I'm kind
Speaker 1: of that's how I imagine this landscape right now. Uh So, anyway,
Speaker 1: you know.
Speaker 2: You know, it's really helped me kind of determine or
Speaker 2: navigate through all this. It was after learning about the
Speaker 2: control structure of kind of you know, America and this earth.
Speaker 2: But it was when I read the Bible, because what
Speaker 2: you'll find out is we are either in the pre
Speaker 2: millennial orrain, which I believe in this is Satan's kingdom,
Speaker 2: or we're in Satan's short season, which is definitely a possibility,
Speaker 2: and it's all part of Satan's deception. Regardless, Satan's in
Speaker 2: charge straight up with the earthly actions that go on.
Speaker 2: So and also this is also interesting too, whether it's
Speaker 2: the end of the seven years, right and we're in
Speaker 2: the pre Millennial reign or the end of Satan's I
Speaker 2: guess it's a tongue twister for me Satan's short season.
Speaker 2: Guess what. Nowhere in scripture does it say that humans
Speaker 2: get together and overthrow This is some the government nowhere right.
Speaker 1: Their savior comes before Jesus.
Speaker 2: That it's a supernatural force that puts an end to it. Specifically,
Speaker 2: in Daniel eight it says a non human force. So
Speaker 2: I quickly came to the realization that anybody claiming they're
Speaker 2: overthrowing the government in a position of power, and there's
Speaker 2: all types of power within the government, you know, within
Speaker 2: the media, within social media that's pretending to fight the system.
Speaker 2: To me, it's just a pology. It's just a lie,
Speaker 2: and they're either a puppet of Israel or Rome. But
Speaker 2: you know, at this point is really a difference.
Speaker 1: Right exactly. Yeah, No, I've well said, and I think
Speaker 1: that we covered a lot of this what I think
Speaker 1: is going on with the ship, So will wind down
Speaker 1: the show. I got a couple of things that, like
Speaker 1: I said, are going on fresh as going on right now? Okay,
Speaker 1: one second, okay, let me pull this up all right.
Speaker 2: So we have.
Speaker 1: China completely surrounded Taiwan. Yeah, so I went to try
Speaker 1: to see if there's anything that had, you know, online
Speaker 1: about this. There's just one thing from six days ago.
Speaker 1: So so let's do this two hours ago, you have
Speaker 1: all this activity. Okay, six days ago they admit that
Speaker 1: there was eight Chinese planned vessels around the territory admid
Speaker 1: ongoing sovereignty tensions, So there was a build up six
Speaker 1: days ago. It is possible that what we're seeing on
Speaker 1: X is real. They're literally using X as something that
Speaker 1: they're like, you know, referencing. So whether or not you know,
Speaker 1: this page is as legit as the one that they're using, obviously,
Speaker 1: I don't know. But you know, it's funny how articles
Speaker 1: have to use X to really get their news because
Speaker 1: that's how fast it comes on X. And that's what
Speaker 1: I was saying, So maybe this gives it some more leverage.
Speaker 1: Twenty minutes ago, President Trump is calling on the NATO
Speaker 1: to help with the United States war.
Speaker 2: And I ran, well, what a great time for China
Speaker 2: to go into Taiwan, right we pulled all of our vessels.
Speaker 2: What a great time, and what a great time if
Speaker 2: you want the Western Empire to collapse after it wasted
Speaker 2: all of its ammunition on what's going on in Israel
Speaker 2: and what's going on in Ukraine. You know, perfect guess
Speaker 2: what China has been telling us. Oh, I love JT
Speaker 2: falls jay Z is a good guy. But you know,
Speaker 2: China's been talking about how they're going to go into
Speaker 2: Taiwan for the past four or five years and I
Speaker 2: think it's either twenty twenty six or twenty twenty seven.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure exactly what it is, but they've been saying,
Speaker 2: we're gonna do it, then, We're gonna do it, then,
Speaker 2: we're gonna do it then, And we've come to that time. Yeah,
Speaker 2: and where the other you know, pressure points are on
Speaker 2: the globe. Like I said, this is the most opportunity
Speaker 2: time for them to do it, right.
Speaker 1: No, I think you're exactly right, dude. It's very crazy.
Speaker 1: It's some wild shit. So that's some development going on
Speaker 1: right now. I don't know if you saw I talked
Speaker 1: about this earlier. Laura Lumer is saying that uh India
Speaker 1: needs to hop in. Have you seen that? Am I
Speaker 1: still sharing?
Speaker 2: So I can't say no, Yeah, I got you.
Speaker 1: So you got this constantly having phone calls with President Trump.
Speaker 1: I wonder why the CIA is investigating Tucker. You know
Speaker 1: that She's like, okay, they're all like talking. They're like, okay,
Speaker 1: it's time to initiate project fucking uh you know, uh
Speaker 1: controlled op. You know, we're gonna really deepen the sever
Speaker 1: between MAGA and Tucker as I we deep in the war.
Speaker 1: I mean, let's call in India. I didn't get them
Speaker 1: going with fucking you know, Israel and everybody.
Speaker 2: Isn't it wild that she is actually presented as being
Speaker 2: associated with Maga. I mean, isn't that wild? Yea or
Speaker 2: Larry Lumer and riding around with Trump on his plane.
Speaker 1: She's yeah, yeah, I don't get how she has the
Speaker 1: ear of of him at all. Uh. But you know,
Speaker 1: whatever your goal is.
Speaker 2: To kiss everybody off, just send her out. Yeah, that's
Speaker 2: the only thing I could think of that, And that's
Speaker 2: why that it's the only thing.
Speaker 1: He sent her out, But he sent tuck her out.
Speaker 1: So it's like, clearly he doesn't want to do better.
Speaker 1: H of course he confirms his Uh, he's alive, guys,
Speaker 1: and he doesn't spoke.
Speaker 4: On he's got five fingers.
Speaker 1: So Sam Tripley and Johnny Woodard right now are having
Speaker 1: beef on X are having beef on X about h
Speaker 1: Johnny Wordard saying, listen, this is a real video. This
Speaker 1: is not AI. That's a real coffee cup. That's not
Speaker 1: what fake coffee like stop and Sam's like, no, dude,
Speaker 1: coffee spills. He's like that shit spilled to the brim
Speaker 1: and should spills. Sam's doing this like weullget you know,
Speaker 1: they're doing a beef online right now. It's very funny.
Speaker 1: That's what's going on on X between those two that,
Speaker 1: Like I saw a minute bill, but it is funny.
Speaker 1: I was pulling this up and I saw more of it.
Speaker 1: I was like, oh, I see what's going on. That's hilarious.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, it's funny. I don't know if it's
Speaker 2: real or not. But I saw somebody on X say
Speaker 2: that they ran it through one of those machines that
Speaker 2: determines whether or not it's AI yeah, and it came
Speaker 2: back as a seventy eight percent chance of being AI.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And a lot of people say that those aren't reliable.
Speaker 1: You know, it said it was ninety eight percent chance
Speaker 1: that you know, him getting pulled out of the rubble
Speaker 1: was real and not AI. So I don't know you
Speaker 1: know again, you know in real world we're living, dude,
Speaker 1: We're living in a world where you cannot verify any.
Speaker 2: Ops bots and sy ops. That's all it is. Takes
Speaker 2: a narrow path with Jesus man. I swear to God,
Speaker 2: it's so dark and so crooked. That's another thing why
Speaker 2: it's just all this stuff. It doesn't drive me to
Speaker 2: live in fear. It just drives me to really focus
Speaker 2: on my relationship with God.
Speaker 1: Absolutely in a little bit of common in a little
Speaker 1: bit of comedy, a.
Speaker 2: Little bit of comedy.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 2: Then again, who knows that Tim Dillon? I think he's
Speaker 2: part of the dude.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, you know, he could very well be.
Speaker 1: He could very well be. Uh, you know, I think
Speaker 1: that he's he's been plugged in with Curtis Yarvin for
Speaker 1: a long time. He when he when he talks about
Speaker 1: oh yeah, he interviewed him years ago and yeah. But
Speaker 1: the thing is he also talks about like he knows
Speaker 1: what these tech bros want. He's talked about the same
Speaker 1: things we talk about in a funny ha ha way,
Speaker 1: like he talks about he talks about exactly he talks
Speaker 1: about some deep ship like what we talk about but
Speaker 1: he does it in a way where people probably laughing
Speaker 1: off is just like him being tim But dude, he's
Speaker 1: being more honest when he tells you that these tech
Speaker 1: bros want to go, you know, live on their own
Speaker 1: on another rock, or do this or that, live forever,
Speaker 1: all these things and you know, let you die and
Speaker 1: he worms or whatever, all those things. He jokes about
Speaker 1: it real and even here, Uh, the only way, you know,
Speaker 1: the only way to sell it to his base is
Speaker 1: just say that the world's ending. I thought across the
Speaker 1: groceries would go down. No, no, no, we're just ending
Speaker 1: the world. We realized we couldn't do any of that.
Speaker 1: We should watch. This is good and they're.
Speaker 2: Getting something out of this. It is the only religious
Speaker 2: and all that stuff to the people.
Speaker 5: Although you want the mess, you don't go to the
Speaker 5: rest work.
Speaker 2: That this is what we're doing.
Speaker 3: We're on our taxes in the world.
Speaker 2: We realized we couldn't.
Speaker 5: Let's be honest, we're ending the world.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's pretty simple. There's zero way you're ever
Speaker 3: going to afford a half. Let's rapture you all. Let's
Speaker 3: rapture you all. It is the only set you have
Speaker 3: in a good life.
Speaker 2: Right now is to hasten.
Speaker 5: The rapture that is right now, the fall and economic
Speaker 5: policy of our country currently right now is the rapture
Speaker 5: it is that.
Speaker 2: Do you ever listen to him Doyling? By the way,
Speaker 2: oh full stop. I used to love Tim doing. I
Speaker 2: still do, in fact that I have. I've only ever
Speaker 2: paid for one Patreon. Oh yeah, I paid for Patreon.
Speaker 2: I thought too, that's so money. Him and Ray comp
Speaker 2: were hilarious.
Speaker 1: I like, absolutely, dude. There was so funny, and he
Speaker 1: just has his pulse on the nation. Like whenever he
Speaker 1: was making a joke about how people whenever they get old,
Speaker 1: they realize that they need to love something, Like these
Speaker 1: boomers realize they need to love something, so they just
Speaker 1: like get an animal. And that's like their whole life
Speaker 1: is like their dog or whatever. It's like they their
Speaker 1: sons are living in apartments and squirrel, you know, dying,
Speaker 1: you know, this whole economy and everything, and they're just like, ah,
Speaker 1: you know, my puppy or my dog, you know, you know,
Speaker 1: And that's just so true. Like everybody knows the old
Speaker 1: like you know boomer who's just like obsessed with their animal.
Speaker 2: But Jes made a good point on Tim Dillon, which
Speaker 2: I kind of felt as well. He's like the new
Speaker 2: Alex Jones in fact, yeah, he's the time mainstream conspiracy
Speaker 2: type of deal. He's slipping right in there. You know
Speaker 2: that Candice is reposting his stuff all the time.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I think you're right about that. Yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: And he's in the sphere. He's in the sphere.
Speaker 2: You know, he talks about it. In fact, his whole
Speaker 2: joke is how rich he is and how poor his
Speaker 2: listeners are.
Speaker 1: And he does not mind exactly, he does not mind.
Speaker 1: He's like a Trump in the way he doesn't mind
Speaker 1: being the villain to tell you the reality of like, yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't care, you know what I mean, Like just
Speaker 1: simple as that, don't give a shit, you know, And
Speaker 1: I'm above you and I'm better and you're not doing
Speaker 1: well and that's not going to change. And I'm going
Speaker 1: to keep doing better and you're going to keep doing
Speaker 1: works and like he those are the jokes he gives,
Speaker 1: and it works, It really does somehow, you know. So,
Speaker 1: but that's hilarious, you know that, you know, I think that,
Speaker 1: you know, part of me always thought, you know, maybe
Speaker 1: that's just to wake people up and give people to
Speaker 1: like be like, all right, motherfucker, what you know, because
Speaker 1: I feel like that's what that would do for me,
Speaker 1: you know.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, Can I address one question real quick? Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: whether or not I'm a pre millennial less or a
Speaker 2: Satan short season person. Personally, I believe we in the
Speaker 2: pre millennial reign. However, I'm not dogmatic about it. I'm
Speaker 2: well aware that we're possibly in Satan short season, and
Speaker 2: I think that they make a great point. However, the
Speaker 2: one thing I will say is we should not let
Speaker 2: eschatology divide us when we have the great commission to
Speaker 2: unite us.
Speaker 1: And yeah, we're gonna have to bring on j Z.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have to bring on g Z and Morphia's
Speaker 1: and have them, have them, have them, have him duke
Speaker 1: it out, have him have a debate. Dude. Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: been a couple of day thing now, and I love it.
Speaker 1: You know, it's all happy, you know what I mean,
Speaker 1: It's all healthy, you know, and even very good about
Speaker 1: it too. It's not like, yeah, yeah, we're both correct,
Speaker 1: he said. Yeah, Morpheus will probably be the best person
Speaker 1: to debate because he's gonna concede by saying like he's like, well, Gay,
Speaker 1: you're right, but so am I. You know, That's that's
Speaker 1: my favorite person argue with because they're like, but we're
Speaker 1: saying the same thing in a different way. You know what.
Speaker 2: I love that whether you're in Satan short season or
Speaker 2: a pre millennial believer, there's no denying that manufacturing prophecy.
Speaker 2: In one aspect, they're trying to make it look like
Speaker 2: or usher in the Antichrist. On the other side, if
Speaker 2: you're in Satan short season, they're trying to make it
Speaker 2: appear as if Jesus or didn't return. So but in
Speaker 2: both cases you have to admit their manufacturing prophecy. And
Speaker 2: I think that's where it can unite us. Oh yeah,
Speaker 2: whether I've had an a knowledge about it.
Speaker 1: Whether it happened or not, they're using your beliefs against
Speaker 1: you to manufacture the optics of prophecy so they can
Speaker 1: usher in this BT system, the new World Order, whatever
Speaker 1: you want to call it. It's always been the plan
Speaker 1: and it hasn't changed. And yeah, that's that's that's the
Speaker 1: core of it, and that's what I try to focus on.
Speaker 1: And and yeah, and uh, by the way, guys, you know,
Speaker 1: I've been pretty distracted with current events, you know, the
Speaker 1: Epstein files, the war. We're going to get back to
Speaker 1: our regular scheduled topics. I've got a fire, you know.
Speaker 1: We're gonna get in all the different apparel that has
Speaker 1: the fingerprint biometric tracking involved with the logos and the
Speaker 1: inside of it. So we're gonna get all the different
Speaker 1: companies that are that are doing this. The EU is
Speaker 1: making it long now where you have to have trackable apparel.
Speaker 1: So these are things that you know, we're going to
Speaker 1: get back and do the core of what we should
Speaker 1: be talking about, which is the technocratic build up of
Speaker 1: the digital twin, you know, and what we talked about,
Speaker 1: the sensing world simulation that you know, they're trying to
Speaker 1: build up so they can enslave us all in a
Speaker 1: digital prison. So that's the core of it. That's the
Speaker 1: sixty agenda. So we'll get back to that regular scheduled shit.
Speaker 1: And by the way, I will be revamping Mystery Babylon
Speaker 1: Bill Cooper's Mystery Babylon. I've been planning to do that
Speaker 1: since I started this podcast, and I'm finally going to
Speaker 1: get to you guys the next week or two as well.
Speaker 1: So Ben, thank you so much for coming on. I'm excited.
Speaker 1: Maybe I'll have you on a couple of those while
Speaker 1: I do that, because I know that you enjoy those
Speaker 1: topics as well, So I'm excited to see.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, yeah. Thank you for having me on.
Speaker 2: It's always a pleasure. And shout out to the audience.
Speaker 2: You've got a good group of people that tune into
Speaker 2: your show. Definitely very insightful. That definitely bring things to
Speaker 2: the conversation that I had no clue about. So thank
Speaker 2: you very much for adding on to all that stuff.
Speaker 2: And it's one big community, right.
Speaker 1: That's what it's supposed to be. Everybody's supposed to bring.
Speaker 1: You know, nobody's better than anybody. Nobody's got. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna know all be all and all nothing
Speaker 1: at all, And you know, I'm just here to have
Speaker 1: fun and talk about cool shit that I found out
Speaker 1: and whatever else that anybody else found out.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and one more thing, Conspiracies without the truth is
Speaker 2: just another sigh off. And the truth is salvation through
Speaker 2: our creator and our Misside Jesus, and I think that
Speaker 2: we should use conspiracies to point out what's wrong or
Speaker 2: a fallacy, but ultimately lead them to the truth and
Speaker 2: I think that's why we should all do it, and
Speaker 2: we can all do that in our everyday life. So
Speaker 2: whether or not you're on YouTube screaming at the top
Speaker 2: of your lungs and your uber drive as you're driving
Speaker 2: uber Jeezy, screaming at the top of your lugs hoping
Speaker 2: I go screaming. But I think we can all do that,
Speaker 2: but hopefully point it all back to God in Jesus.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. Yeah, I had a great time today, dude.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 1: We've been doing some bangers back to backs together, Ben,
Speaker 1: thank you, and yeah, shout out to the chat. You
Speaker 1: guys are awesome. Anybody who came over from the past
Speaker 1: recent episodes I've been doing, uh, traveling around with everybody
Speaker 1: else doing the continentals and whatever else. Thank you for
Speaker 1: coming over and hope you stick around. I got something
Speaker 1: coming out with Nugget News. He's an Australian alternative media
Speaker 1: guy and so check that out. Nugget News, so be
Speaker 1: coming out with that this week, you guys. Check out
Speaker 1: our conversation. He's gonna come on this Thursday and talk
Speaker 1: about the the nine to eleven style event that happened
Speaker 1: in Tasmania where he lives. That got their guns taken
Speaker 1: away in Australia. So for our Australian listeners, do we
Speaker 1: have be ready for that, stay tuned and if any
Speaker 1: of you requested me to get on there, thank you.
Speaker 1: But yeah, so that'd be cool. I'm excited because I
Speaker 1: never even heard about that, like what that what happened?
Speaker 1: I forgot what the name even was to the event.
Speaker 1: That's how little I know. So I'm excited to learn
Speaker 1: all about that as well. Okay, thank you for co
Speaker 1: or on Ben. Tell me they can find you as always.
Speaker 2: So you can find me at End of the World
Speaker 2: News on Instagram and you can find it at End
Speaker 2: of the World's News on YouTube. But I would say
Speaker 2: just go to my Instagram and it has a link
Speaker 2: to my YouTube handle there because it's kind of a
Speaker 2: hard handle, or on Spotify. But if you're watching this
Speaker 2: on YouTube, then just go check me out there. Yeah yeah.
Speaker 1: If you're on social media, I employ you. You got
Speaker 1: to follow us on all the platforms.
Speaker 2: Just do it.
Speaker 1: Just do it. Instagram, YouTube, just go there, go there.
Speaker 1: If you can find us, do it. Thank you, thank you. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: We'll see you all around. Thanks for coming and hanging
Speaker 1: out with us. Martin Bryant shooting in Tasmania, lost your
Speaker 1: guns over that stile. Thank you, Cake, and I knew
Speaker 1: you'd be excited for that show, So stay tuned for
Speaker 1: that show on Thursday. All right, Thank you guys, See
Speaker 1: you round