Speaker 1: Good morning. It is Tuesday, November twelfth, right and round
Speaker 1: eight fifteen am Mountain Standard time seven fifteen for those
Speaker 1: of you out on the Pacific time zone, and that
Speaker 1: would be nine to fifteen Central and ten fifteen Eastern.
Speaker 1: So it's a little different now because of everyone else
Speaker 1: following Daylight saving his time except for us. And this
Speaker 1: is the only time I could do it. I can't
Speaker 1: go later in the day because there's just too much
Speaker 1: to do all the time. So thank you for adjusting
Speaker 1: or watching after the fact or whatever. I appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Also appreciate. Once again, I want to thank everybody who
Speaker 1: supports the show in the very many ways that you do, watching,
Speaker 1: following sharing, being part of the Telegram group supporting the gifts,
Speaker 1: and that allowed me to get the computer, and you know,
Speaker 1: doing other things like signing up for doctor Glynnen's membership,
Speaker 1: you know, getting stuff from Azure well using the coupon
Speaker 1: code BB five and using ball Busters fifteen on doctor
Speaker 1: Manto's new site. And I think I've shown all of
Speaker 1: you that already, but he has a new site and
Speaker 1: it's right here. So this is the video I was
Speaker 1: going to play some footage I pulled off of my
Speaker 1: co pro yesterday. Took up all the filespace on my
Speaker 1: phone just to put it on the app. That's crazy.
Speaker 1: So you hit the show more button drags it down.
Speaker 1: You'll see the doctor Peter Glynnen thing here on the
Speaker 1: very top. Nominate doctor Peter g Lidden here and that's
Speaker 1: for you can do this with doctor Manza as well.
Speaker 1: And that's the MAHA thing for the Department of Health
Speaker 1: and Human Services right and oh, I guess it's under twice.
Speaker 1: I just didn't realize it was a underneath his name.
Speaker 1: So I did have it on there, I just didn't
Speaker 1: have it on the top. Good to know, all right,
Speaker 1: So scrolling down, scrolling down, scrolling down, there's the Patreon
Speaker 1: right there. I know there's a lot of commercials in
Speaker 1: the podcast version. They upped the ante and dropped a
Speaker 1: whole bunch ever since we were approaching the election and
Speaker 1: all them. I'm sure all the ads are awful. So
Speaker 1: the Patreon is here. I have no control over what
Speaker 1: they post and what their beliefs that they're expressing are,
Speaker 1: so don't shoot to me for that over on the
Speaker 1: you know, podcast providers. But here on my website there's
Speaker 1: a direct link there where you can just click that
Speaker 1: and then you don't need to keep on code anymore.
Speaker 1: Isn't that cool?
Speaker 2: Click that.
Speaker 1: And you're in his store. Then the way you see
Speaker 1: the energy I dying as well, which is much cheaper
Speaker 1: than it used to be. That's awesome. Okay, there you go,
Speaker 1: and I added the try blue here and you should
Speaker 1: pop up when you do this. You should have a
Speaker 1: little thing pop up here that says click here to
Speaker 1: copy for seventeen percent off. For whatever reason mine, I
Speaker 1: think the cookies or something like that is not doing it.
Speaker 1: It's redirecting to hear. But that's the direct link. If
Speaker 1: you click it, it should it should pop it up.
Speaker 1: And then like I said before, there's the as you're well,
Speaker 1: you just click it. That's the code right there, and
Speaker 1: then doctor Peter Glinton and I put the code right here.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I'm very happy that I was able to
Speaker 1: accomplish the computer build. Again, I haven't haven't gone any
Speaker 1: further with it yet. Had a couple questions about bios,
Speaker 1: whether or not it had to be a bootiful bootable
Speaker 1: flash drive. It doesn't need to be, so I think
Speaker 1: the flash drive that I used yesterday is fine, or
Speaker 1: the day before. I don't remember when I did, and
Speaker 1: I just have to be more confident about what I
Speaker 1: did because I don't want to plug it in. There's
Speaker 1: a couple of questions I have as far as the
Speaker 1: whole you know, goings on of that. Anyway, once if
Speaker 1: I get bios open, then I'm gonna be like staring blankly, like, Okay,
Speaker 1: what do I have to set adjust and do whatever
Speaker 1: for the but the particulars of the components of this
Speaker 1: and and then drivers installation and then us. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying that's in that order or not, but yeah, so
Speaker 1: there you have it. We're gonna start with the video today,
Speaker 1: thinking it should still be that I don't have to
Speaker 1: put the audio on, but if you're out there, let
Speaker 1: me know. I shouldn't have to for telegram. I should
Speaker 1: just come straight through the mic or through that set.
Speaker 1: How many people are here right now?
Speaker 2: Not bad? Not bad?
Speaker 1: We're kicking it over a kick we are.
Speaker 2: I love it.
Speaker 1: I I'm very happy with this kick thing, probably mostly
Speaker 1: because it's not Twitter. But let me show you real quick.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna have the audio and I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: show you the thing. So Kick dot com Ballbusters videos,
Speaker 1: right you could. And it's almost like an exact real
Speaker 1: time here too, so that's kind of cool. There you go,
Speaker 1: and there it is. Woodn't whole follower, No big deal.
Speaker 1: This guy has four hundred and fifty five thousand subscribers
Speaker 1: or followers on what's his name rumble. Here you go
Speaker 1: and he has forty one thousand here. So I mean
Speaker 1: it's smaller site, but I'm pretty happy with the way
Speaker 1: it looks. It looks really nice in my opinion. So
Speaker 1: there's that. So I found this site. It's your favorite
Speaker 1: celebrity Jewish. How funny is that? Who'd you better? Search
Speaker 1: LLC dot com And no, apparently Chivvy Chase is not.
Speaker 1: And I was like, because I was curious because the
Speaker 1: Friars Club and the Friars were established by boys that
Speaker 1: you know, he was roasted there, and I made it choked.
Speaker 1: This was like over a decade ago, because you know,
Speaker 1: Chevy Chase is a comedian and all that. When he
Speaker 1: was when he was notified that he would be getting
Speaker 1: roasted by the Friars Club, his first question was, I'm Jewish, Yeah,
Speaker 1: but he's not. Apparently I thought he was. Okay, So
Speaker 1: we'll start with this video it was shared by probably Poka.
Speaker 1: Wasn't likely Poka does that. I'm gonna say it was, yes,
Speaker 1: it was, yes, and there's a couple of issues with it,
Speaker 1: but I'm gonna talk about some other things too. It's
Speaker 1: gonna we're we're laying the foundation for we're about to
Speaker 1: talk about today. And I'm reading that Michael Ssayrian book
Speaker 1: about druids and I was cross preferencing it with another book,
Speaker 1: which I believe is called Vale of Isis, but it's
Speaker 1: all garbled, so I don't know who the author is,
Speaker 1: and it's not it's not Bolovatski. It's not the same thing.
Speaker 1: It's something different. But yeah, so they're taking it from
Speaker 1: a different angle, much earlier book and Cesarean it seems
Speaker 1: to like have a disconnect saying everything had started in
Speaker 1: Ireland and Celtic and Britain, and I'm like, not really.
Speaker 1: The Northmen came down and populated those areas, so whatever
Speaker 1: they whatever culture and ideas they came with, were the
Speaker 1: predominant before their influences occurred. So it's not so much
Speaker 1: that it started there, you know, it's was trans supported
Speaker 1: there from some of ourselves, making that place the primary source,
Speaker 1: but whatever, I think he's Irish, so of course everything's
Speaker 1: gonna be Irish, right. It's a it's a thing people do.
Speaker 1: We'll get into that today. If you're wondering why it
Speaker 1: seemed like a little bit not as energy driven today.
Speaker 1: It's just I was looking at some of the old
Speaker 1: home videos that I did with the GoPro on vacation,
Speaker 1: and like, my daughter and I are making pizza, and
Speaker 1: I think, I just I need to mellow out because
Speaker 1: I don't mean to come across the way I do.
Speaker 1: But when I watch myself after the fact, and dad
Speaker 1: being a dad doesn't need to be that intense. And
Speaker 1: even though there was a correction that needed to be made,
Speaker 1: I could have done it in a lot nicer way
Speaker 1: verbally obviously not with never never with these but it's
Speaker 1: just it maybe it made me really understand that I
Speaker 1: have some things to work on. So I'm not a
Speaker 1: I'm a sinner. Everybody I'm not. I'm not a good person.
Speaker 1: So the thing that matters the most is that I'm
Speaker 1: a good father that leaves good memories, so I don't
Speaker 1: want to taint them ever by even though when you
Speaker 1: have to correct, there's a way to do it and granted,
Speaker 1: very resistant child, so sometimes the emphasis needs to be applied,
Speaker 1: but I just didn't. I also should be asking questions
Speaker 1: first before assuming that I know the intent behind and
Speaker 1: it was because usually it's very it's very innocent. So
Speaker 1: I understand that now, and and I understand that I'm
Speaker 1: not doing it as bad as good as well as
Speaker 1: I could be. So that's making me a little bit,
Speaker 1: you know, more humble than having humility right now. So
Speaker 1: I just that's why where my head's at right now.
Speaker 1: I'm part of the problem is me, not just Rebecca
Speaker 1: and the way she manipulates, but part of the problem
Speaker 1: is me, maybe because of other things that lead up
Speaker 1: to that or whatever, the threshold and the situation. But
Speaker 1: I don't need to be part of the problem. And
Speaker 1: having noticed that, I think it means I can hopefully
Speaker 1: be better. And I'm gonna because it's important, all right.
Speaker 1: That being said, let's get into this and again, hopefully
Speaker 1: this just plays, but I'll be monitoring on I guess
Speaker 1: my phone the chat to get the verification that you
Speaker 1: guys can hear it. Let me go ahead and put
Speaker 1: that on real quick, rum boom, all right, So so weird,
Speaker 1: how they don't show the chat like it's blank on
Speaker 1: the phone, but I can see, you know, there's stuff
Speaker 1: in there. All right, so let's go ahead and watch
Speaker 1: this real quick. Like I said, it's not perfect, but
Speaker 1: there's some information in here that this is going to
Speaker 1: be useful for today's presentation. All right, let me know
Speaker 1: if you're hear it. Please.
Speaker 3: Ironism is indeed the philosophy or the movement of people
Speaker 3: who want to establish a new.
Speaker 1: How are you doing here? I know there's a delay,
Speaker 1: probably a significant one in fact. What happened there? It
Speaker 1: just does things. I swear to try that again. You
Speaker 1: can't even move your mouth, and something about ruling it.
Speaker 1: It's just it's weird. Ah yah sat it again? Yes,
Speaker 1: you can hear us something.
Speaker 3: Meanism is indeed the philosophy or the movement of people
Speaker 3: who want to establish a new Israel as the center
Speaker 3: of a one world government. In order to accomplish their goal,
Speaker 3: they however, had to do one very important thing. They
Speaker 3: needed the support of the worldwide Christian community. They needed
Speaker 3: the churches on their side. So in the nineteenth century,
Speaker 3: before Israel was founded, the Roychalds worked closely with several
Speaker 3: people in Christianity. They attracted a man called Cyrus Schofield.
Speaker 1: He was he seemed to jump over Darby. Darby was
Speaker 1: part of the problem, the whole movement that this all
Speaker 1: came from. This christian Zionism was implemented through the converts
Speaker 1: of Frankism into Christianity twenty six thousand, including Jacob Prink
Speaker 1: himself baptized, and these Brethrens that grew up out of it.
Speaker 1: Darby was one of those people, maybe even completely unaware
Speaker 1: of the roots of it, but still instilled with their philosophy,
Speaker 1: which he carried on with the Exclusive Brethren. And then
Speaker 1: you have Scofield coming out with this, you know, his
Speaker 1: little notes to tell you how to read everything.
Speaker 3: Convicted criminal lawyer, an expert in fraud and forgery.
Speaker 4: He was asked to.
Speaker 3: Create a new Bible, the Schofield Study Bible.
Speaker 1: It just sounds like the perfect guy to write something
Speaker 1: like that, right once you get into the Council and
Speaker 1: I see it and see how that was put together,
Speaker 1: and oh yeah, since we're on the topic, let me
Speaker 1: go ahead and just go ahead and be this to
Speaker 1: you just so we're just so we're all clear. Yes,
Speaker 1: the first priests of Constantine's Christianity were at largely converted Jews.
Speaker 1: So when you say, well, no, the Jews were being
Speaker 1: you know, whatever you want to call it. Uh, they
Speaker 1: were prejudiced against them in Rome. Well it's because the
Speaker 1: power players were already under the new garb of Christianity
Speaker 1: and therefore that's what happened. But it's still controlled by
Speaker 1: a core of these cryptos at the very heart of Christianity.
Speaker 1: So if you're ever asking yourself, where's the connection, because
Speaker 1: they seem to hate each other, Well, it's because they
Speaker 1: built the goddamn thing, right, they wrote the books, they
Speaker 1: built the thing. And what's Rome involved in it? Well,
Speaker 1: here you go, I mean, how is it? How is
Speaker 1: it all connected? And how is this also the way
Speaker 1: the Rothschilds operate. Because the Rothschild's or either Knights of
Speaker 1: Malta or highly acclaimed with the star of the Cross
Speaker 1: of Saint Sylvester by the Holy See, whom the Rothschilds
Speaker 1: also bailed out two separate times, and in today's dollars
Speaker 1: it would be in the mega billions. So why did
Speaker 1: they do that? Did they buy it?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 1: I think they're in service to Rome, as like the
Speaker 1: property managers of the world of State, because this is
Speaker 1: still their pet project, you see what I mean. So
Speaker 1: this is always the manipulation. Manipulate from one end, controlled
Speaker 1: out on the other side, and throw in Muslim for
Speaker 1: some for some randomness. Right, So when you don't, when
Speaker 1: you don't want to take the heat from this side
Speaker 1: or that side, you can always point out the third one.
Speaker 1: All right, So it says constantinees Christianity. Uh yeah, the
Speaker 1: first priests of Constantine's Christianity were largely converted Jews, as
Speaker 1: the earliest Christian converts were primarily Jewish, and the religion
Speaker 1: initially spread within Jewish communities before expanding to Gentiles nations,
Speaker 1: meaning the early leadership of Christian Church would have consisted
Speaker 1: mainly of Jewish converts to Christianity. And they're saying that
Speaker 1: this is and I don't buy this part. Christianity began
Speaker 1: as a Jewish sect, with the first followers Jesus being Jewish.
Speaker 1: I don't buy that. That's that's I don't think that's true.
Speaker 1: I don't I have my doubts about when he was
Speaker 1: even born and how long ago it truly was, if
Speaker 1: it was even a thing at all. When Constantine legalized Christianity.
Speaker 1: Many of the early Christian leaders were likely Jewish con
Speaker 1: verds who had but this is what they did. They
Speaker 1: saw an opportunity for more power and control, dropped the
Speaker 1: dropped with the with they espoused, and then went right,
Speaker 1: just like what they did with a Saboten Frankism. It's like,
Speaker 1: as soon as they feel okay, we can stand behind
Speaker 1: this leader, Meshack whatever, fifty of them went Sabatai. And
Speaker 1: the only reason why the rabbinical crowd was opposed to
Speaker 1: Sabotai not because they saw them as a Satanic radical
Speaker 1: sect or whatever. It's because it was it was a
Speaker 1: threat to their power. Same thing with Frankism. It's not
Speaker 1: because of the morality of Francism, because that's all found
Speaker 1: in the Talmud. It's all found in the Zohar prior
Speaker 1: to Luria's Kabbala, right. I think it was Moses bent
Speaker 1: Leon or whatever de Leon or whatever for the most
Speaker 1: part in the in the Zohar. But it's it's all
Speaker 1: the same lack of principles, lack of morality found in
Speaker 1: all this stuff, drinking blood, child sacrifice, wife swapping, passing
Speaker 1: your children around, ritual abuse, all kinds of horrific things, murder, poisoning,
Speaker 1: all the all the fun characteristics of jesuit too oddly enough.
Speaker 1: And it's not that they oppose them for being in
Speaker 1: direct conflict with what they were already doing themselves as rabbis.
Speaker 1: It's just that they felt this to be a division
Speaker 1: of their power, weakening their their influence, and that's why
Speaker 1: they opposed Frankism. And then they play it out in
Speaker 1: the in the history like, no, we those guys are
Speaker 1: the bad guys. No, it's it's just because they want
Speaker 1: to consolidate the power themselves. It's not because they have
Speaker 1: anything against those principles, because they weren't new. They were
Speaker 1: doing that already. It was just because of that separation
Speaker 1: there where they weren't they weren't the ones being, you know,
Speaker 1: turn to for every goddamn thing. The Cahol the Sanhedrin
Speaker 1: saw that as a threat. And that's all it is.
Speaker 1: It's not nothing else about that. Look, when I talked
Speaker 1: about the care writes yesterday, they completely reject, so they say,
Speaker 1: to completely reject rabbinical interpretations of the Torah. Now again,
Speaker 1: that book and by itself is bad enough the way
Speaker 1: it was written when it comes to us and what
Speaker 1: they want to do with Amelek. But all the other
Speaker 1: crap about the toalmwood, with the three year olds and
Speaker 1: all this stuff, they reject all that. So does that
Speaker 1: make them better? Maybe morally superior? Probably?
Speaker 2: All right?
Speaker 1: So then it says conversion of the Christianyon constantly legalized Christianity.
Speaker 1: Many of the early Christian leaders were likely Jewish converts
Speaker 1: who had already been practicing the faith for generations. Now
Speaker 1: let's go to this part. It says, And because I
Speaker 1: was reading another book the other day and they're like,
Speaker 1: Constantine wasn't even the guy. So let me read this
Speaker 1: to you. Yes, Emperor Theodosius the First adopted Christianity as
Speaker 1: the official religion of the Roman Empire, while Emperor Constantine
Speaker 1: they call him the Great roll my eyes, adopted Christianity
Speaker 1: as his favored cult. And this is where you get
Speaker 1: all that paganism in it too, Right, this sunlt crap
Speaker 1: mithraism instilled upon it doesn't mean that that's why, doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that the how am I supposed to say? This
Speaker 1: doesn't mean that? Wasn't They used it as an archetype,
Speaker 1: which made have diminished the reality. If there was a
Speaker 1: real guy named Jesus to fit the mold in the
Speaker 1: New Testament, right, But that doesn't necessarily mean that Jesus
Speaker 1: was a construct of set. It's just that they gave
Speaker 1: him those attributes because it would number one, it would
Speaker 1: be relatable to a lot more people, and adopted more easily,
Speaker 1: because then, oh, Mithra Jesus. You know, Mithraism was only
Speaker 1: for the elite anyway, but there are a lot of
Speaker 1: the even let's put it this way, even going back
Speaker 1: to the Scythians, a more pure sun veneration came from them.
Speaker 1: They venerated the sun. They didn't worship it. They knew
Speaker 1: of a god, a single one, and the son was
Speaker 1: a representation of his power in his life, giving attributes.
Speaker 1: So they venerated the sun as a symbol of a god,
Speaker 1: a god single, and they didn't sacrifice animals, people, or
Speaker 1: any of that crap until they started getting mixed up
Speaker 1: with these people who helped develop Christianity many years later.
Speaker 1: But when they were encountering them in summer, when they
Speaker 1: were encountering them everywhere else, even the Druids changed form.
Speaker 1: So at one point they weren't doing all this horrific
Speaker 1: shit and then the corruption of this priest craft that's
Speaker 1: been around for whoever knows how long, and how did
Speaker 1: they ever come up with this idea of magic in
Speaker 1: the first place. All questions to be answered. What do
Speaker 1: they know about the salt circle? How did they know
Speaker 1: how to conjure? Where did they get learned all this information?
Speaker 1: How did that practice develop? And why so long ago?
Speaker 1: And why still now? If there was nothing to it,
Speaker 1: obviously there's something to it. Otherwise they wouldn't do it anymore.
Speaker 1: They would find another way to do something sick and
Speaker 1: get some kind of power from a different realm or
Speaker 1: energy or whatever. So there's a common element here and
Speaker 1: it's filtered through many every encounter. So we have to
Speaker 1: look at it because this is important before we start
Speaker 1: going off and saying the Kilts Gaelic bad. They killed
Speaker 1: people and they you know, they were very very H's
Speaker 1: kind of like what the Sanhedrid does, kind of like
Speaker 1: what the Muslims did was they would have people spies
Speaker 1: in their daily life, making sure that people were behaving
Speaker 1: in a certain way, otherwise it would be held at pay.
Speaker 1: And when did that happen? And how did the people
Speaker 1: who once were a pure sun cult of not murdering
Speaker 1: people for their practice become entrenched in this you know, bloody,
Speaker 1: bloody practice, and it's because of magic and the the
Speaker 1: seduction of it. These people started like a parasite or
Speaker 1: somebody who's now cursed and has to then behave in
Speaker 1: a different way to feed the beast, which is something
Speaker 1: that's also potential. They started changing their ways and you
Speaker 1: can even read through this. This is why the Frisians
Speaker 1: talked about how their cousins from north, southeast and west
Speaker 1: they had problems with. They had problems with the fins,
Speaker 1: They had problems with all kinds of their own like ethnic,
Speaker 1: hereditary background. When they would encounter them and they would
Speaker 1: steal their children, and the magi would steal their children.
Speaker 1: All these priest crafts would which is basically one would
Speaker 1: terrorize them and steal their children, sometimes to do horrible
Speaker 1: things too, sometimes to groom and then send back into
Speaker 1: the community to influence others. And that's so with the order,
Speaker 1: Linda book is actually really important because you see the
Speaker 1: difference and you see what the corruption occurred, and you
Speaker 1: see how it did, and that's why it's it's important
Speaker 1: to see that and try to figure out why and
Speaker 1: how and what is this? What is this saturn cult
Speaker 1: and how does it apply to this pagan sun ritual
Speaker 1: cult right of the of the moments of the Persians?
Speaker 1: And how did that develop from a once less murderous,
Speaker 1: less inhumane practice. And it's because of the influence of
Speaker 1: a certain group of sorcerers who enticed others. Once there
Speaker 1: were a moon colt and they were a saturn cult,
Speaker 1: and that got blended into the sun colt and kind
Speaker 1: of co opted into this thing that now everybody just
Speaker 1: points at this and say that's pagan sun worship. Well,
Speaker 1: it's at the very root of it. They were just
Speaker 1: picking an object that's pretty pretty, you know, obvious in
Speaker 1: the sky. The most powerful thing that we can imagine,
Speaker 1: you know, from that perspective in that position is looking
Speaker 1: up in sun giving life, giving of itself to produce life.
Speaker 1: And there was, you know, a single god belief there.
Speaker 1: So how is that any different than a benevolent creator?
Speaker 1: And how is that any different than what we what
Speaker 1: we perceived Christianity to be about. But the thing in
Speaker 1: the middle there is what corrupt coutrupts everything, right, So
Speaker 1: it says around three twelve Constantine adopted Christianity as his
Speaker 1: preferred cult. He may have been influenced by his mother Helena,
Speaker 1: Huh Helena, Hurricane Helena and the declare and he declared
Speaker 1: himself a Christian after issuing the Edict of Milan. Remember
Speaker 1: he's responsible for the Nicean consul that he stood over
Speaker 1: the shoulder of everybody. Remember a group of converted Jews, right,
Speaker 1: even though that's not really a term. It's basically a
Speaker 1: mixed multitude of uh criminals and sorcerers that then became
Speaker 1: a race because they said so, right, even though they
Speaker 1: all have different backgrounds. And when you go to that
Speaker 1: study that shows that ninety percent of the people living
Speaker 1: in Israel don't have any quote unquote Semitic blood in
Speaker 1: the DNA test, I don't know how they did they
Speaker 1: do that off of a small test sample. How did
Speaker 1: they test nine all one hundred percent of the people.
Speaker 1: And it's there's a lot of questions there, but that's
Speaker 1: what they're rolling with. That it's the official story that
Speaker 1: they're giving putting out and that's from the the media
Speaker 1: that you know is supportive of that thing. So for
Speaker 1: them to put it out there, it's kind of interesting.
Speaker 1: So Theodosious the first in three eighty, So around three
Speaker 1: twelve Constantine adopted Christianity as a preferred cult. Theodolticious in
Speaker 1: three eighty issued the Edith of Thessalonica, making Niceene Christianity
Speaker 1: the official religion of the Roman Empire. The Adocius is
Speaker 1: credited with presiding over the beginning of the end of
Speaker 1: paganism and a triumph of Christianity. It wouldn't have happened
Speaker 1: without powerful people, right, It would have likely fizzled out
Speaker 1: and been an anomaly on the mark, a blip. So
Speaker 1: there's some things in here. I also wanted to mention
Speaker 1: specifically about Constantine. I'm trying to find it. I took
Speaker 1: a bunch of snapshots yesterday. Oh there's some stuff about
Speaker 1: the word Christos in here too, that's kind of interesting.
Speaker 1: Hopefully we'll get to it one of these episodes, all right,
Speaker 1: So let's look at.
Speaker 6: It.
Speaker 1: Says this is a different book. The Druids possessed remarkable
Speaker 1: powers and immunities, like the Levites, the Hebrews, and the
Speaker 1: Egyptian priests. They were exempted from taxes and from military service.
Speaker 1: They also annually elected the magistrates of cities. They educated
Speaker 1: all children of whatever station, not permitting their parents to
Speaker 1: receive them till they were fourteen years of age. The
Speaker 1: state or the priestcraft owned your children. They see how
Speaker 1: they're trying to go back to that utilizing the state. Thus,
Speaker 1: the druids were regarded as the real fathers of the people,
Speaker 1: regardless if they wanted to be the children of those
Speaker 1: priests or not. The terrible priests formed the councils of
Speaker 1: the state and declared peace or war as they pleased.
Speaker 1: Now what they don't make a distinction of here is
Speaker 1: whether or not that we're talking about the original quote
Speaker 1: unquote Druids that they wiped away the history of or
Speaker 1: they're talking about the later Druids that just donned the
Speaker 1: same persona, just like they did with the Phoenicians. The
Speaker 1: Phoenicians once were one people than they were more of
Speaker 1: this tribe, but they just call them Phoenicians and they
Speaker 1: blur the line. So you think that Phoenicians were all
Speaker 1: about sacrifice and this and that, and they were corrupted
Speaker 1: to that degree later on, but initially no, These terrible
Speaker 1: priests formed the councils of the state and declared peace
Speaker 1: or war as they pleased. Sounds familiar. The poor slave
Speaker 1: whom they seated on the throne. Listen to this, theo
Speaker 1: think about e a pak, think about who really owns
Speaker 1: this country and how it's top Now listen to this,
Speaker 1: and declared peace of war as they please the poor
Speaker 1: slave whom they seated on a throne, and whom they
Speaker 1: permitted to wear the robes more gorgeous even than their own.
Speaker 1: As surrounded, was surrounded by his noblemen, but by the druids,
Speaker 1: their advisors, the ones keeping a tab on them, right,
Speaker 1: the secret Service. So if you fall, come out of line, yeah,
Speaker 1: maybe we don't fall, maybe we don't protect it that day,
Speaker 1: or maybe we do something to you. He was a
Speaker 1: prisoner in his court, and his jailers were inexorable, for
Speaker 1: they were. The priests found that very interesting. There was
Speaker 1: a chief druid to advise him, a bard to sing
Speaker 1: to him, a senecai or a counselor to register his
Speaker 1: action in the Greek character, and a physician to attend
Speaker 1: to his health and to cure or kill him as
Speaker 1: they as the state required, all the priests of Britain,
Speaker 1: and all the physicians, all the judges and all the
Speaker 1: learned men, all the pleaders and courts of law, and
Speaker 1: the musicians belonged to the order of the Druids. We've
Speaker 1: seen any patterns here. Let us now consider these orders
Speaker 1: under their respective denominations the deroid, derwid guarred in ovid,
Speaker 1: and under their their separate vocations as philosophers, musicians and priests.
Speaker 1: There's there can be This is what they say. There
Speaker 1: can be no doubt that they were profoundly learned for
Speaker 1: ordinary purposes of writing and in keeping of their account
Speaker 1: on the Alexandrian method. They use the ancient Greek character
Speaker 1: of which Cadmus, one of their phoenicians, and to imagines
Speaker 1: a druid were said to have been the inventors and
Speaker 1: to have impourted into Greece. Let's see. Now we'll go
Speaker 1: to the next one. Oh, here's here's an interesting one too.
Speaker 1: Because they were the physicians, right, this sounds very familiar.
Speaker 1: They were more anxious to prevent, and that could be
Speaker 1: a false a falsehood, right, because how do you prevent disease?
Speaker 1: You keep yourself healthy by neutrifying yourself. Right, don't don't
Speaker 1: have load up and talk with toxins. Simple enough, try
Speaker 1: to avoid poison and being shot with an arrow or otherwise,
Speaker 1: it says there were more anxious. They were more anxious
Speaker 1: to prevent disease than to cure them. Is that not
Speaker 1: an allopathy? And their their prevention is all fraud to
Speaker 1: get to the poison in you? And issued many maxims
Speaker 1: relating to the care of the body, as wise as
Speaker 1: those which appertained to the soul were divine. Of these
Speaker 1: I will get. So that's interesting when you understand intent,
Speaker 1: because it is the proper method prevent it by being
Speaker 1: healthy in the first place and knowing what that means.
Speaker 1: But when you have ill intent, it's a little different.
Speaker 1: In later times, the Irish, who believe they are descendants
Speaker 1: from David obtained and European it should be a area
Speaker 1: in European fame for their skill in the making of
Speaker 1: this instrument. Dante mentions the circumstances, and the harp is
Speaker 1: still a mint mark upon Irish coin. The Bards, from
Speaker 1: what they what we can learn of them, either debased
Speaker 1: there art or calum to calumny nor to adulation, but
Speaker 1: were in every way as worthy of the admiration as
Speaker 1: those profound philosophers whom Yeah, that one wasn't the one
Speaker 1: I wanted to read but we're getting a we're getting
Speaker 1: an idea here, right, and then we're looking at cubes, stones,
Speaker 1: Saturn and other interesting little tidbits here. Mercury, Apollo, Neptune,
Speaker 1: and Hercules were worshiped under the form of a square stone.
Speaker 1: Hercules was never supposed to be deified. That was potentially
Speaker 1: a real person in way back area in slash sythy
Speaker 1: at times that was carried over into Greek mythology, and
Speaker 1: by that time deified were half deified, if you will.
Speaker 1: A large blackstone was the emblem of Buddha among the
Speaker 1: Hindus and of Manathus Siries in Arabia. The Paphians worshiped
Speaker 1: their venus under the form of a white pyramid, the
Speaker 1: Thebans their bacchus under that of a pillar, the Scandinavians
Speaker 1: their Odin under that of a cube, the Siamese their
Speaker 1: uh somanac somanac od semanacodom. I guess it's just hyphenated
Speaker 1: under the black pyramid. We talked about the Israelites and
Speaker 1: the Druids. The word sacrifice means offering of the cake,
Speaker 1: and there can be no doubt out that those thin
Speaker 1: broadcakes of the ancient Britons which with a libation of flour, milk,
Speaker 1: eggs and herbs or milk dew. Milk dew and acorns
Speaker 1: are still superstitiously offered in the North of Britain. Formed
Speaker 1: the usual sacrifice. They also offer the bore, and it
Speaker 1: is not improbable that the hair hand goose, which they
Speaker 1: were forbidden to eat. Just interesting stuff, just things that
Speaker 1: I will touch back on later, just to have in
Speaker 1: their memory for the moment. What is happening here? Okay,
Speaker 1: let's watch this again. I just moved the freaking mouse.
Speaker 1: That's all I freaking did.
Speaker 3: Ironism is indeed the philosophy or the movements of people
Speaker 3: who want to establish a new Israel as the center
Speaker 3: of a one borld government. In order to accomplish their goal,
Speaker 3: they however, had to do one very important thing. They
Speaker 3: needed the support of the worldwide Christian community.
Speaker 4: They needed the churches on their side.
Speaker 3: So in the nineteenth century, before Israel was founded, the
Speaker 3: Rothschilds worked closely with several people in Christianity.
Speaker 4: They attracted a man called Cyrus Schofield.
Speaker 3: He was a convicted criminal lawyer an expert in fraud
Speaker 3: and forgery. He was asked to create a new Bible,
Speaker 3: the Schofield Study Bible. This was the first Bible in
Speaker 3: all of history to contain hundreds of footnotes. In these footnotes,
Speaker 3: a new doctrine was introduced into the American Evangelical Church
Speaker 3: which says that there was a new political military Israel
Speaker 3: and that that would be the place where the Messiah
Speaker 3: would come to rule the world. And they said that
Speaker 3: that would be the fulfillment of the promise that God
Speaker 3: had made to Abraham, and that would also be the
Speaker 3: fulfillment of the promise that Christ would return to Earth.
Speaker 1: All assumptions and presumptions based off people who lie about
Speaker 1: everything else, that you're going to believe that history that
Speaker 1: was formulated way later than what they say. It was
Speaker 1: backdating and utilizing other people's myths and actual living people
Speaker 1: who were then deified, changing names, changing circumstances, writing because
Speaker 1: they're not that original, other people's stories, and making a
Speaker 1: torah out of it and then jading it with their
Speaker 1: lack of morality. This Bible was then, or even the
Speaker 1: New Testament. And I see in all kinds of different
Speaker 1: influences there. The Greek as we've seen, could potentially be
Speaker 1: a polemic in and of itself. Against Christ that was
Speaker 1: turned into something else, later.
Speaker 3: Spread all throughout America through the Moodi Bible Institute, and
Speaker 3: it became the foundation for the current day evangelical theology.
Speaker 4: Nobody was aware that this Bible was.
Speaker 3: Directly funded by Satanists and that it served the agenda
Speaker 3: to get Christianity on their side for establishing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you could just say Francis too, because that's who
Speaker 1: the Brethren were. But also he's acquating the Rothchales to
Speaker 1: the Frankists, I mean to the Satanists, which again they
Speaker 1: were converted to Francism, a.
Speaker 3: New Israel that would become the headquarters of their one
Speaker 3: world government. And again I know that all the sounds
Speaker 3: outrageous too many people who have never heard this before.
Speaker 4: But you can research this, and I encourage you to
Speaker 4: do your due diligence.
Speaker 3: I've studied this for decades and I know what I'm
Speaker 3: talking about, but it's very difficult sometimes, and you talk
Speaker 3: to people who are not informed, who have simply accepted
Speaker 3: a certain mindset, who have blindly believed that, and who
Speaker 3: repeated to everybody else without ever doing their research.
Speaker 4: But all this is historical fact.
Speaker 3: The Schofield Study Bible was published by the Oxford University Press,
Speaker 3: which was owned by the road Childs. And this whole
Speaker 3: theology was first written out by John Darby, whose family
Speaker 3: owned the most haunted castle in the world, Leap Castle,
Speaker 3: where one hundred and fifty dead bodies were found in
Speaker 3: the cellars and where Satanic masses were held. John Darby
Speaker 3: used all kinds of occult terms.
Speaker 4: In his religious writings.
Speaker 3: He was involved in many secret societies and occult groups,
Speaker 3: and he is the one who educated Cyrus Schofield. But
Speaker 3: John Darby was an employee of the road Childs. He
Speaker 3: worked for the East in the company the Schofield Study.
Speaker 3: Bible literally said that everyone who supported this new Israel
Speaker 3: would be asked by God, and everyone who did not
Speaker 3: support it would be cursed by God. So fear and
Speaker 3: intimidation was used to force Christians to be on their side,
Speaker 3: and they succeeded.
Speaker 6: Why are they working for Israel? Are we crazy?
Speaker 5: Are we out of our minds? How are we letting
Speaker 5: this happen? How are we letting it happen? Our money,
Speaker 5: our representatives, our military.
Speaker 1: Rep And I think yesterday I commented on that I
Speaker 1: assured you what I commented on from telegram and that's
Speaker 1: simply that they're not our military, they're not our taxes.
Speaker 1: It's not our money. I mean they tax us, yes,
Speaker 1: but they're not our representatives. We are not a constitutional
Speaker 1: republic anymore. We haven't been for some time. So the
Speaker 1: IMF controls us. That's the rothschilds. So if they want
Speaker 1: us to do something for Israel, then that's what's gonna happen.
Speaker 1: They own the country, the people who quote unquote run it,
Speaker 1: and the militaries which they established, which we feel right,
Speaker 1: the roles and positions of but who guides it. Hey,
Speaker 1: everything looks great until you get called upon to do
Speaker 1: something and then you have to jump and do it.
Speaker 1: What your master says, other.
Speaker 5: Than stopping it, is not only allowing it to happen,
Speaker 5: but is participating willfully in this horrifically, like I said,
Speaker 5: sadistic form of genocide. Alexeyfer was saying, the genocide didn't
Speaker 5: start after October seven. And the whole conversation about genocide.
Speaker 6: Is really quite interesting.
Speaker 5: Genocide is a crime. It's a well defined crime. It
Speaker 5: was defined in nineteen forty nine to a large degree
Speaker 5: as a result of the genocide of the Jews in
Speaker 5: Europe by the Nazis.
Speaker 6: It's a well defined crime. You can read it.
Speaker 1: Well. Is that not inverted history? Though? The claim of
Speaker 1: that versus the reality of who was truly genocided? Were
Speaker 1: the Germanic people for some time leading up to the
Speaker 1: First and Second World War and then afterward and still
Speaker 1: continues today through their other method, which is allopathy. That
Speaker 1: when I'm reading these books countless times, these fake pandemics
Speaker 1: were you know, foisted upon the German people, and they
Speaker 1: were poisoned, poisoned by the shots, poisoned by the pharmaceutical
Speaker 1: and not to mention just a daily practice of allopathy.
Speaker 1: They do it to all of us, but they were
Speaker 1: very very specifically targeting Germanic people and still are our heritage,
Speaker 1: our roots, going all the way back to Scythian and
Speaker 1: Arian culture.
Speaker 6: Right, it's not a question of opinion. It's not a
Speaker 6: question of do we feel about it? Do we feel
Speaker 6: it genocidal?
Speaker 5: But this is how the conversation is, do you feel
Speaker 5: like it might be genocide?
Speaker 6: Is your opinion that it might be?
Speaker 5: Just read the law, it's very clear it fits.
Speaker 1: It's but not when they do it right, because they
Speaker 1: established the laws, so it doesn't apply to them.
Speaker 6: It's genocide.
Speaker 5: They are murdering civilians for almost eight decades in a
Speaker 5: systemic way, systematic erasure of a nation, systematic erasure of
Speaker 5: a culture, a history, and a country.
Speaker 6: That is genocide. There's no opinion here. The law is clear,
Speaker 6: the evidence is clear. And yet the.
Speaker 5: Money is coming from us, the weapons are coming from us,
Speaker 5: the support is coming from us.
Speaker 6: And rather than condemning.
Speaker 5: That, where asked to condemn the Palistinians, the victims of this,
Speaker 5: not the Palistinis are victims. I don't like to use
Speaker 5: that term. Palistadians are heroes, They're not victims.
Speaker 6: But who is it they were trying to they were
Speaker 6: supposed to condemn? Why?
Speaker 5: And there's a lot of similarities to what we're seeing
Speaker 5: on campuses. You see the politicians come out, You see
Speaker 5: the university administrators and.
Speaker 6: Presidents come out. Why are they not standing with the students?
Speaker 6: Why are they not standing with the students?
Speaker 5: How can they justify to themselves not standing with the
Speaker 5: students the students are demanding with their campuses divest from
Speaker 5: that war machine, that genocide machine. And who are the
Speaker 5: administrators and the politicians condemning.
Speaker 6: The students? Who are the police beating up the students.
Speaker 5: Who's being arrested and punished and suspended the students? Once again,
Speaker 5: we're out of our minds and we're allowing this to happen.
Speaker 5: These administrators have a right to suspend these heroes. These
Speaker 5: encampments will be remembered as one of the greatest moments
Speaker 5: in the history of these campuses.
Speaker 6: Your names will be remembered, They'll be put.
Speaker 2: On Okay, I'll give you a minute. There might be
Speaker 2: more here.
Speaker 1: Orthodox Jews burn Desionists is really flagged and Insburg Brooklyn
Speaker 1: and Joseph asked me what I thought of the Orthodox
Speaker 1: burning the Zionist flag that's saving face making confusion. I
Speaker 1: don't know, but I said, they hate us all and
Speaker 1: that's all that matters. They do this to give the
Speaker 1: impression of the good and the bad, as if there's
Speaker 1: a difference when it comes to how they feel about us.
Speaker 1: With the exception of a very small population of Charrites
Speaker 1: who reject their medical Judaism it Talmud and also the
Speaker 1: Kabbala and have gone as far as they say Jesus
Speaker 1: was a good man a prophet, the Oi Vays have
Speaker 1: shown us what they are through Frankism and Frankists infiltrated
Speaker 1: and infected the world, including creating Christian Zionism, so that
Speaker 1: most don't even realize they support their own demise. Care
Speaker 1: Wrights still aren't fluffy puppies by any means, but maybe
Speaker 1: in all most were exterminated long ago by Muslim and
Speaker 1: Jew occupiers of Spain after the Muslim invasion, and we're
Speaker 1: talking they came about hundreds of years later, after the
Speaker 1: additional invasion. I didn't make that clear there. So the
Speaker 1: care writes on, at least on the outside, are anti
Speaker 1: Temudists and anti Zoharists slash cabalists, right cabalists and Okay,
Speaker 1: so I'll just read this again because I found it.
Speaker 1: It says this is also a deception. And this is
Speaker 1: what I was talking about with the guy saying our
Speaker 1: money are our military, YadA YadA. I said, they act
Speaker 1: as if there's a choice. How are we to let
Speaker 1: how are we letting this happen our money, our resources,
Speaker 1: our soldiers, And I said, no, they're not. Taxes are
Speaker 1: attribute payment to the IMFU in Roman Empire for the debt,
Speaker 1: the fake debt, right, the usury debt. We're being told
Speaker 1: where to send billions because it's owed through usury and
Speaker 1: the multi trillions to the rawchild IMF City of London.
Speaker 1: Bakers they spend, We pay the tab they create meeting
Speaker 1: the politicians you know do this spending. If they tell
Speaker 1: us to fund billions to Ukraine or Israel, it's not
Speaker 1: even close to what the sorcerers of usury claim we
Speaker 1: owe or chattel, which is a personal possession of the bankers.
Speaker 1: That's why they put the Federally Reserve here. It's basically
Speaker 1: a hostile foreign embassy like the UN and CFR. We
Speaker 1: have no constitution under a system of government that declares
Speaker 1: us enemies of the state in nineteen thirty three and
Speaker 1: their property and the calamus as their property to dispose
Speaker 1: of as they wish. And said, that's just the country's
Speaker 1: true rulers expressing their inner selves on the landscape of Israel.
Speaker 1: I was referring to a post of Joseph's and I said,
Speaker 1: whose weapons are they actually life testing? Theirs they don't make.
Speaker 1: They don't make crap. It's from the military cooperations here.
Speaker 1: They have no other friend countries suicidal enough to supply
Speaker 1: them with weapons of war, because they'd use them on
Speaker 1: those quote unquote friends. Let's not forget also that Muslims
Speaker 1: are pretty freaking terrible throughout history as well, save the
Speaker 1: women and children and the people not involved in just
Speaker 1: as whacked out religion extremeism. So but Islam is a
Speaker 1: quieter version of what it was historically, They and the
Speaker 1: Jays did a lot of Infidel butchering and crucifixion. And
Speaker 1: this quote here. While the Zionists try to make the
Speaker 1: rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of
Speaker 1: the jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a
Speaker 1: Palestinian state, the Jews again slighthly duped the dumb Goiam.
Speaker 1: It doesn't even enter their heads to build up a
Speaker 1: Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there.
Speaker 1: All they want is a central organization for their international
Speaker 1: world swindler, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed
Speaker 1: from the intervention of other states, a haven for convicted scoundrels,
Speaker 1: and a university of budding crooks. It is a sign
Speaker 1: of their rising confidence and sense of security that at
Speaker 1: a time when one section is still playing the German,
Speaker 1: Frenchman or Englishman, the other with open effrontery, comes out
Speaker 1: as the Jewish race. There might be somewhere here, Joseph.
Speaker 1: This is one, says Joseph Rosebaum died fighting for justice.
Speaker 1: He was practicing judaism. This is funny. Rosenbaum raped five boys.
Speaker 1: Sentencing records reveal practicing judaism, raping five boys, practicing judaism,
Speaker 1: raping five boys, raping five boys practicing judaism. There you go, oh,
Speaker 1: Phaarah made a cake last night, so that's what it
Speaker 1: supposed to look like. Instead of putting it on the side,
Speaker 1: she decided to was on the top and nailed it.
Speaker 1: It's cute. Super got the news there did the mouth
Speaker 1: like that? Very close to the picture on that part.
Speaker 2: Free.
Speaker 1: We'll go into more of this later. I have to
Speaker 1: look at this stuff. I haven't. I haven't got a
Speaker 1: chance to look at these newer ones. Wow. That's a
Speaker 1: that's a good that's a good, uh statement right there.
Speaker 1: I'll miss you too, honey. I have to kill some
Speaker 1: children your age and Syria. Yeah, this is funny. It's
Speaker 1: just you know Hebrew. He says, I don't know what
Speaker 1: this is, but fuck you. So this is a getting
Speaker 1: naive though, because they don't understand that this is these
Speaker 1: are these are methods to maintain uh watchful eye over
Speaker 1: American politicians and you know, indebt them. But also this
Speaker 1: is because they already are the true operators of the country.
Speaker 1: It's not because of any other any other thing. They
Speaker 1: allow us to believe it falsely in the illusion that
Speaker 1: we're sovereign from them, but we're not. We are bank property.
Speaker 1: So it says Jews aren't in control of the American
Speaker 1: political system because of high IQ and work ethic. It's
Speaker 1: because they are willing to bribe, blackmail, murder American politicians
Speaker 1: to get what they want. And they they do that
Speaker 1: to everybody, their own people. That's how they keep everybody
Speaker 1: in line. All right, that's it for that. Now let's
Speaker 1: go into the Z book here. There's some comments. Hold on,
Speaker 1: they might be the same ones.
Speaker 2: Let me just jack.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no, nothing new, I f DJ. Let's go have
Speaker 1: a look over here real quick. Make sure I'm not
Speaker 1: missing anything. Is it plain? I don't know, Yeah, it
Speaker 1: looks like it. Not sure why it's not. Let me
Speaker 1: hit play. Well, that's very good. There might be something wrong. No,
Speaker 1: it looks like it is. I just had to refresh.
Speaker 1: I guess there. We go have a look at very
Speaker 1: cool and chat empty all right, cool, good enough. So
Speaker 1: if you are over here though and you want to
Speaker 1: do a quick click to the gifts and go, Like
Speaker 1: I said, I looked it over and as far as
Speaker 1: the software paid version of Daviniti, that's two ninety five
Speaker 1: and I'm sure there's tax, and then there's a couple
Speaker 1: of other things that if I buy the OS for Windows,
Speaker 1: then it's going to be about eighty from anywhere plus
Speaker 1: or minus on that. So yeah, we're still still looking
Speaker 1: to finish the computer project and also time spent and
Speaker 1: all that. So if anybody ever wants to do that,
Speaker 1: that's right there. You just click it in a bang.
Speaker 1: You're right there, right and thank you to anonymous kimer
Speaker 1: in a and Kevin Dalton. Kevin Dalton, Kevin Dalton, you're
Speaker 1: the man, buddy, Anthony. You guys everybody think is appreciated.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 1: And Browie.
Speaker 2: Right here.
Speaker 1: And then this one. If you're already established on FTJ
Speaker 1: media with a wallet, then you can just click this
Speaker 1: thing and you can put whatever value you want in here.
Speaker 1: But these ones all have like a little icon that
Speaker 1: pops up in the chat. Then this one that says
Speaker 1: two quick ver Haitians is a picture of a duck
Speaker 1: ha ha ha, And then you can scroll over to
Speaker 1: see what the total amounts are. There you go, all right,
Speaker 1: you don't have to use the drop down, so you
Speaker 1: can just put whatever you want in there. So that's there.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna read this introduction some of it. I most
Speaker 1: of it's really interesting. I don't agree with one hundred
Speaker 1: percent of it. But he starts off by saying, a
Speaker 1: wild child discovered living among beasts in the forest may
Speaker 1: be removed from his environment and in relatively short time
Speaker 1: be tame, tutored, and made into a veritable gentleman. From
Speaker 1: the jungle to the ballroom. It has been done. There
Speaker 1: are striking examples of this radical process of conversion and acculturation. Anthropologists, sociologists,
Speaker 1: and psychologists have closely observed.
Speaker 2: Scott check one thing.
Speaker 1: Is that true? Hold on, there we go. I think
Speaker 1: we're back. No, I don't know why I was doing that,
Speaker 1: all right, closely observed wild child's development with marked approbation.
Speaker 1: While Darwinists enthusiastically like in the adaptation, however, hastened of
Speaker 1: the once primitive specimen to the evolutionary ascent of the species.
Speaker 1: Regardless of the edification of scientists. We can glean one
Speaker 1: simple point. A man, even a very primitive man, can
Speaker 1: have his behavior and personality shaped and changed. His essential
Speaker 1: character can be altered by the persistent and deliberate application
Speaker 1: of condition of conditioning techniques. It matters little whether these
Speaker 1: impositions are natural or unnatural, or whether they're mortal or not.
Speaker 1: What matters is that a man is changed. Once upon time,
Speaker 1: he was one thing, then after interference, he becomes something else.
Speaker 1: So this is another point to be you know, put
Speaker 1: a tab in that. Put it in there, because these
Speaker 1: grooming tactics that were utilized against Frisians and other Germanic
Speaker 1: Gucci Gothic people may not have been one hundred percent
Speaker 1: just because they were enticed by the idea of magic.
Speaker 1: It could have been because they were groomed, stolen, and
Speaker 1: then put back into their society to change their society. Naturally,
Speaker 1: psychologists are all too aware of the myriad factors that
Speaker 1: operate to a culturate men and women of the world.
Speaker 1: They perpetually studied and index them. Here's another interesting thing.
Speaker 1: It makes you wonder. It makes you wonder when you're
Speaker 1: not just addressing how to understand self it's almost more
Speaker 1: extreme than that. It's more directed and more targeted. It
Speaker 1: seems like the people who are in these industries or
Speaker 1: these establishments, these institutions, psychologists who we know from the
Speaker 1: very get go or fraudulent Freud was a Frankeist true story.
Speaker 1: It's almost as if they're studying a different species other
Speaker 1: than themselves. The way that they look at it, as
Speaker 1: if it's something foreign or alien to them to be studied.
Speaker 1: It's just an impression that I get. They potentially study
Speaker 1: and index them right. Cataloging. It is quite the subject
Speaker 1: matter of many discussions as to how humans have been
Speaker 1: conditioned and shaped not only by nature, but by the
Speaker 1: artificial environments of their own manufacturer. So if you don't
Speaker 1: have a basis of morality, then other people who do
Speaker 1: have empathy and compassion would be foreign to you, would
Speaker 1: be alien to you. So they look to see how
Speaker 1: they manipulate, and they manipulate through emotion, fear being a
Speaker 1: basic one, but also emotion as in addressing your sensibilities
Speaker 1: to gain your acceptance and approval of something. As long
Speaker 1: as they tell you that some kind of injustice has occurred,
Speaker 1: then they okay. Well, then the reaction should be this,
Speaker 1: and we support that right, regardless of the validity of
Speaker 1: the statement or not.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: So, it says they perpetually study and index them. It
Speaker 1: is quite the subject matter of many discussions as to
Speaker 1: how humans have been conditioned in shape, not only by nature,
Speaker 1: but by the artificial environments of their own manufacture. We
Speaker 1: are conditioned, and we are conditioners. What is slightly less
Speaker 1: a matter for the conventional staff room and laboratory is
Speaker 1: a question of how larger units of society might likewise
Speaker 1: suffer being controlled and manipulated by external interference. For some reason,
Speaker 1: this question, which is asked by few, has rarely been
Speaker 1: the topic of open analysis. If we were advocates of
Speaker 1: the theory of mass control, we might point to this
Speaker 1: relative hesitation as significant proof for the manipulation we suspect
Speaker 1: does indeed incur occur. Now, I'll send them with it.
Speaker 1: When the subjects of mass control and social engineering are approached,
Speaker 1: we encounter various responses When it is proven to exist.
Speaker 1: Communists and totalitarians and those of their ilk are wont
Speaker 1: to excuse to excuse it, saying that it is inevitable.
Speaker 1: They stress that man, once left to his own devices
Speaker 1: inevitably behaves as a debauched and reckless miscreant in that
Speaker 1: social controls are most definitely required to restrain its antisocial
Speaker 1: drives and to main structure in order. Who are they
Speaker 1: really describing, though, because mankind was doing just fine when
Speaker 1: was left alone for many an ancient day prior to
Speaker 1: the manipulation. There are many such rebuttals and arguments that
Speaker 1: get pitted against those who question the problematic topic of
Speaker 1: human freedom. Perhaps some will say man can and should
Speaker 1: be free in certain areas and not so free in others.
Speaker 1: Others will muse that man is moving towards some wondrous
Speaker 1: utopian pinnacle, on that his development toward that place of
Speaker 1: sublime all knowingness and all goodness must be caretaken. Social
Speaker 1: midwife free is necessary, they will cry, since leaving man
Speaker 1: to his own devices could so utopia means a lack
Speaker 1: of freedom in a socialistic, communistic hotalitarian government. Is what
Speaker 1: this is saying that's freedom freedom is inverted. Social midway
Speaker 1: free is necessary, they will cry, since leaving man to
Speaker 1: his own devices could delay and even prevent the great
Speaker 1: neetic transcendence. Whatever the case may be, and whatever arguments
Speaker 1: for or against social engineering. It is perhaps a needed
Speaker 1: step forward to entertain the idea that it does occur
Speaker 1: and that it is an ongoing phenomenon. Although there is
Speaker 1: some healthy acknowledgment. Remember this is Michael Thessaian The Irish
Speaker 1: Origins of Civilization. Apparently this is volume two. Although there
Speaker 1: is some healthy acknowledgment of social control and some erudite
Speaker 1: researches concerning it, we appear to live in societies that
Speaker 1: are predisposed to reject and deny conjectures, theories, or revelations
Speaker 1: concerning the deliberate, artificial, and perhaps malicious manipulation of groups
Speaker 1: and societies. This denial is the accepted prerogative of the
Speaker 1: closed minded person who prefers to inhabit a one season
Speaker 1: ruled and to imagine that he or she is the
Speaker 1: principal architect of their own life path. It is a
Speaker 1: comfortable notion, to be sure, and one that will not
Speaker 1: be contradicted. For most people. It cannot be contradicted regardless
Speaker 1: of evidence presented. This is kind of going toward that
Speaker 1: whole idea that was expressed by all right, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: you're rebsment off right, No matter how much information you
Speaker 1: prevent is present to them. They were not. Uh, they're not.
Speaker 1: Concept of the world does not does not it's not
Speaker 1: compatible with that information, So therefore that it's not recognized.
Speaker 2: Where was I?
Speaker 1: It is almost or am I? It is like? No,
Speaker 1: It is almost impossible for a hypnotized mind control, theological desensitized,
Speaker 1: or a psychopathic person to be aware of their own
Speaker 1: error or dementia. And even those normally adjusted people are
Speaker 1: hesitant to see what is in plain view because of
Speaker 1: the depth of their embedded programming and because they were
Speaker 1: so young when the conditioning began. It is not conditioning
Speaker 1: at all them. It is natural and needed adjustment, and
Speaker 1: no other possible mode of life is any more normal
Speaker 1: than to them. Other kinds of lifestyle within the world
Speaker 1: as is maybe desired, and all sorts of modifications are
Speaker 1: permitted in order to make the mentally and physically incarcerated
Speaker 1: fuel accommodated within the false reality. But to condemn the
Speaker 1: whole rotten edifice that prevents men from true maturation is
Speaker 1: to encounter marked hesitation and resistance from those who believe
Speaker 1: they have so much to lose should their ideas of
Speaker 1: reality be challenged. To offer critiques concerning the five senses.
Speaker 1: Reality is to come up against every one of the
Speaker 1: innumerble defenses that define the anaboity of anatomy of the
Speaker 1: human ego. As the Freudians, as the Frankes Freudians know,
Speaker 1: the human ego is little more than a mass of defenses.
Speaker 1: The ego, ideal and super ego complexes within consciousness defend
Speaker 1: against content threatening to ego autonomy. The ego's defense apparatus
Speaker 1: operates in this way even at the cost of higher
Speaker 1: forms of expression and awareness. The defenses operate to secure
Speaker 1: the mat and to secure an The defenses operate to
Speaker 1: secure the image that one has of oneself, even if
Speaker 1: the image has been largely implanted by external authorities. Indeed,
Speaker 1: the super ego has been regarded as the psychic representative
Speaker 1: representative of external authority. Something to point out about social media, TikTok,
Speaker 1: super quick videos, flashy colors, the dumbing down of people.
Speaker 1: If your image of self is diminished to the superficial
Speaker 1: existence at a young age, you're going to be killing
Speaker 1: the soul before the body dies. You gotta be careful
Speaker 1: that you don't harm your children by giving them access
Speaker 1: to things that they've been begging you for right, like,
Speaker 1: can I see my phone? Can I be on the computer?
Speaker 1: Can I watch those videos on YouTube? Family? Blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: A lot of it is very artificial, very superficial, very
Speaker 1: a bunch of rich families who got money, you got
Speaker 1: maybe rich off of doing YouTube because they have millions
Speaker 1: upon millions of subscribe you know, followers and subscribers and views.
Speaker 1: But it's all trash. There's nothing there and you're not
Speaker 1: learning anything. It's all very very stupid, and it dumbs
Speaker 1: people down to say that's entertainment and this is this
Speaker 1: is who you should model yourself after after, because that's
Speaker 1: the impression that people get successful. They have huge, beautiful
Speaker 1: houses and that're on TV. So now there's you know,
Speaker 1: they're influential stars and they're not good actors. Their content
Speaker 1: is very questionable and sometimes that's very dark overtones to it,
Speaker 1: and it's all very dumb. It doesn't inspire, it doesn't
Speaker 1: it doesn't have any morality or values to it whatsoever.
Speaker 1: So if you're if you're completely you know, immersed in
Speaker 1: that with an impressionable young mind, how do you think
Speaker 1: you're going to view life superficially? And that's going to
Speaker 1: kill the soul that was beautiful inside there prior to
Speaker 1: that influence.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: Indeed, the super ego has been regarded as a as
Speaker 1: the psychic represents representative of the external authority, and interestingly,
Speaker 1: its nature is binary. There are permissive defenses and prohibitive ones,
Speaker 1: and like most biotic functions, they operate unconsciously. These various
Speaker 1: ego settings came into existence due to the titanic forces
Speaker 1: that beset our ego consciousness from within and without, from
Speaker 1: the unconscious and from the world. Sanity is a balancing act,
Speaker 1: and as we say, there's a thin line between genius
Speaker 1: and madness. Hold that thought, because I want to show
Speaker 1: you something else. I'm out the super dry. Let's read
Speaker 1: this real quick. Minnesota dad. Minnesota dad, a father who
Speaker 1: ranted against Trump election, gunned down his wife, ex girlfriend,
Speaker 1: and his two kids in murder suicide. Make sure you
Speaker 1: can see it looks like you can. Minnesota dad who
Speaker 1: ranted against Trump, the Minnesota dad who ran it against
Speaker 1: Trump against President elect Donald Trump online and killed his wife,
Speaker 1: ex partner and his two sons before turning the gun
Speaker 1: on himself. According to the authorities, he should have done in
Speaker 1: reverse order. He wouldn't have been able to finish. He'd
Speaker 1: have just been able to take himself out the shoot her.
Speaker 1: Forty six years old. Forty six year old Anthony Nephew
Speaker 1: had a pattern of mental health issues, to luth Police
Speaker 1: Chief Mike Sinah sat on Friday, one day after authorities
Speaker 1: found five people dead inside two homes in the city.
Speaker 1: Authorities found Anthony's nephews Anthony nephews ex partner Aaron Abramson
Speaker 1: forty seven, and their son Jacob Nephew fifteen, dead from
Speaker 1: apparent gunshot wounds inside their home Thursday afternoon. Police said
Speaker 1: this his freaking children after identifying Anthony Nephew as a
Speaker 1: sub suspect. Police found a forty five year old wife,
Speaker 1: Catherine Nephew, and their seven year old son, Oliver Nephew
Speaker 1: from gunshot wounds inside their family home close by Anthony.
Speaker 1: So he lived next to his x too, Anthony Nephew,
Speaker 1: or maybe he moved so they could be nearer son,
Speaker 1: but it doesn't seem like he had too much of
Speaker 1: a shit to give about him. Anthony Nephew was also
Speaker 1: found dead inside the home from a self inflicted gunshot.
Speaker 1: When police said before his rampage, Anthony Nephew had been
Speaker 1: sharing left wing an anti Trump post on his Facebook account.
Speaker 1: Remember this came from MSN. My mental health in the
Speaker 1: world can no longer peacefully coexist, and a lot of
Speaker 1: the reason is religion. He wrote in July, I am
Speaker 1: terrified of religious zealot's inflicting their misguided beliefs on me
Speaker 1: and my family. I have intrusive thoughts of being burned
Speaker 1: at the stake as a witch or crucified on a
Speaker 1: burning cross. Having people actually believe that I or my
Speaker 1: child are Satan or the Antichrist, or whatever their favorite
Speaker 1: color of boogeyman. They are afraid, are I guess this
Speaker 1: week that doesn't bode well. In another post, he accused
Speaker 1: Republicans of making it harder for women to leave abusive relationships.
Speaker 1: Gilliad here we come, he wrote, referencing The Handmaid's Tale,
Speaker 1: a Dyspopian novel turned Hulu series in which women who
Speaker 1: have been stripped of their rights are forced to reproduce
Speaker 1: for the ruling class. Anthony Nephew shared other political posts,
Speaker 1: including an image of former President Barack Obama, Trump, President
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, and Vice President Kamala Harris. The word hate
Speaker 1: sits under Trump's face, while the words hope, heal and
Speaker 1: grow correspond with democratic politicians.
Speaker 2: What an idiot?
Speaker 1: So he was able to murder that child and that
Speaker 1: child fifteen, I think he's in that seven right, Not
Speaker 1: that anyone cares this is him again, but as an
Speaker 1: independent voter, I would really like to see both the
Speaker 1: political parties in our country pick better candidates. We can
Speaker 1: do better than a binary choice between fascism and not fascism.
Speaker 1: Apparently he doesn't understand the definition of fascism. It was
Speaker 1: a movement against Zionist Bolshevism in the political sense, obviously
Speaker 1: has deeper historical roots. Anthony Nephew previously even issued at
Speaker 1: chilling warning about his mental health battles, writing in an
Speaker 1: op ed in the local Duluth News Tribune in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one. For millions of Americans, a breakdown leads to
Speaker 1: suicide or homicide before suicide, Well that was there. You
Speaker 1: have it. Mental health in the country is stigmatized, ignored,
Speaker 1: or treated as a burden for the individual to bear
Speaker 1: alone with little help or less understanding. Apparently he didn't
Speaker 1: know about better health. That's advertised that he must not
Speaker 1: watch a lot of YouTube because it's every fucking video.
Speaker 1: As Americans deny they have mental health struggles, this is
Speaker 1: him still talking because they have to, because they're told to,
Speaker 1: or because they don't realize their minds is broken. I
Speaker 1: bet you he was on a lot of psychiatric drugs
Speaker 1: that made this worse. Police and delude. The city of
Speaker 1: nearly ninety thousand residents, about one hundred and thirty five
Speaker 1: miles north of Minneapolis, have not yet determined a motive
Speaker 1: in the shootings. Police said there is no ongoing threat
Speaker 1: to the community. Well, if he killed himself, obviously not
Speaker 1: all dead. I don't know if the hew project Purple
Speaker 1: is but I don't want to know. If I play
Speaker 1: this then I have to I will. But let me
Speaker 1: just go ahead change it so you can hear it.
Speaker 7: Zi two eight pm Thursday, November seventh, Duluth Police Department
Speaker 7: was contacted by the city of Superior to do a
Speaker 7: welfare check on one of their employees. Responding officers went
Speaker 7: to the home in the six thousand block of Dakoni
Speaker 7: Street and found two victims who were deceased from a
Speaker 7: parent gunshold woods. Forty seven year old Daluth resident Arab
Speaker 7: Abramson and her fifteen year old son Daluth resident Jacob Nephew.
Speaker 7: During an interview with the reporting party, they identified a
Speaker 7: purse of interest as forty six year old Daluth resident
Speaker 7: Anthony Nephew. Nephew resided in the forty four hundred block
Speaker 7: of West sixth Street. Investigators set up surveillance at his
Speaker 7: residence and a short time later discovered he had a
Speaker 7: wife and child who also resided with him. Due to
Speaker 7: that knowledge, edgency was established to make entry into the
Speaker 7: home for a welfare child. We made entry with the drones.
Speaker 7: Officers located forty five year old Daluth resident Katherine Katherine
Speaker 7: nephew Ramslan and her seventy seven year old her seven
Speaker 7: year old son Duluth resident Oliver Nephew.
Speaker 1: He's not the best reader is He deceased from a
Speaker 1: parent gunshod books.
Speaker 7: Officers also located the suspect, Anthony Nephew, who was deceased
Speaker 7: with what appeared to be a self inflicted gunshod Actually,
Speaker 7: so there.
Speaker 1: It is not laughing because it's funny, sucks, but it happened,
Speaker 1: So we were at Sanity is a balancing act, a
Speaker 1: thin line between genius and madness. The thin line exists
Speaker 1: also between independence and conformity, and between freedom and enslavement.
Speaker 1: If the human ego senses that the inner and outer
Speaker 1: threats are intensifying, it threat it tightens, and like a shellfish,
Speaker 1: retracts from reality. This process is known to psychologists as regression.
Speaker 1: The egos behavior is then more conservative and rational. What's
Speaker 1: wrong with well, playing close to the chest and being
Speaker 1: how's our connection there? I think frantic but reserved, not conservative,
Speaker 1: interrational would be a better choice. That's that's one of
Speaker 1: the things that bothered me right there. It's just the
Speaker 1: way that was because that word is loaded. That's a
Speaker 1: loaded political word. So it's like it's like assigning conservative
Speaker 1: too irrational in a sense in the subconscience, which is
Speaker 1: a fraudulent way to do things. That's not okay. Shame
Speaker 1: I use this area and if you did it that intentionally.
Speaker 1: The regressive tendencies, together with many others denial, repression, identification, sublimination, sadomasochism,
Speaker 1: aggression and self destruction, perversity, insanity, et cetera, are manipulated
Speaker 1: by autocrats who seek to control the mass of mankind
Speaker 1: in the same manner as wild child is controlled by
Speaker 1: an individual master who, like any animal tamer, expertly displays
Speaker 1: his two faces, his permissive and prehuitive tendencies. Doing the side,
Speaker 1: wild child is soon trapped in a web from which
Speaker 1: he can never free himself. He becomes enmeshed in a
Speaker 1: net tighter yet more tensile than those prepared and laid
Speaker 1: for his erstwhile forest cousins. Now, let me remind you
Speaker 1: that I titled one of my chapters in my book
Speaker 1: here that you can still get on my website and
Speaker 1: everywhere else. Amazon hasn't deleted it yet, and it's also
Speaker 1: on Barnes and Noble priest Craft Beyond Babylon. It says
Speaker 1: in one of the chapters. One of the chapters is
Speaker 1: what hell is it? A spider does not stick to
Speaker 1: its own web. The manipulators don't get caught up in
Speaker 1: the manipulation. Right. Instead of the sun and moon to
Speaker 1: look down upon him, he has the all seeing eye
Speaker 1: of his imperious master, watching his every flex and twitch,
Speaker 1: and peering deeply into the miasma of his mind. The
Speaker 1: smile he sees greeting him every morning becomes infinitely more
Speaker 1: sinister and troubling to him than any painful pride of
Speaker 1: incomprehensible or incomprehensible laboratory test. Wild Child despises the punitive
Speaker 1: aspects of Master, but is gratified and appeased when his
Speaker 1: correctness impresses his ust to your father, wild Child develops
Speaker 1: a love versus hate relationship with the Master. He is
Speaker 1: attracted and repulsed at the same time. He detests the
Speaker 1: power his master has over him, but covets that kind
Speaker 1: of power himself. He is subconsciously attracted to it and
Speaker 1: bids his time waiting until he can graciously, no gratuitously,
Speaker 1: exercise control over a creature's meeker than himself. So as
Speaker 1: long as he finds his lot in that system, he'll
Speaker 1: be just as much of a tyrant to those beneath him. Eventually,
Speaker 1: while Child learns how to how the power structure works
Speaker 1: hierarch hierarchy art Can I say that hierarchically and now?
Speaker 1: And how even his own master is himself a servant
Speaker 1: of some other agency, Yeah, like the political structure. He
Speaker 1: learns that there is pain in store for his tendency
Speaker 1: to Malinger, and that there are punishments in store for
Speaker 1: even questioning his lot. In the end, he accepts his
Speaker 1: servitude and grows accustomed to his own place in the
Speaker 1: great invisible hierarchy. The experiment to change is the experiment
Speaker 1: to change is that central nature occurred early, and despite
Speaker 1: resistance and uh recaltrient, that what I'm familiar with and
Speaker 1: recalculature urges. Wild Child eventually becomes tame child. He learns
Speaker 1: to adjust and to even be rather shameful of his
Speaker 1: previous form of existence that was more natural and free.
Speaker 1: He learns to disapprove of those who exist as he
Speaker 1: once did. His identification with the object of his own
Speaker 1: hatred turns him into an oppressor and a dominator. In
Speaker 1: his ambivalent and schizoid state, Tame Child brings havoc to
Speaker 1: the world, but his ego censors prevent him from apprehending
Speaker 1: himself as the cause. The world's problems are mysterious in origin,
Speaker 1: have nothing to do with him. He may centrally deplore
Speaker 1: what he is, what he sees, and he may try
Speaker 1: to topically remedy some of the blatant injustices and affronts
Speaker 1: he encounters, but looking deeply into causes and motives is
Speaker 1: certainly not his forte Endeavors of that kind leave him
Speaker 1: feeling ineffectual and frustrated, and he prefers to leave that
Speaker 1: kind of thing to others. His hours and days of
Speaker 1: central experimentation with the phenomena of the world must not
Speaker 1: be halted by thoughts concerning meaning. Life is life, it
Speaker 1: does not have a meaning. Such becomes the credo of
Speaker 1: the tame child. It's also the idea of there is
Speaker 1: no God, there is no vital force, there is no
Speaker 1: innate wisdom of the human body. There's all that secure
Speaker 1: humanist idea in there being implanted by just the aura
Speaker 1: that we're immersed in with this culture. Such becomes the
Speaker 1: credo of dan if any if and when his personal
Speaker 1: ideas of reality come under attack from external adversity, he
Speaker 1: can escape into drugs and sexual gratification. He can also
Speaker 1: just blatantly attack those other ideas or the other evidence
Speaker 1: that would shake this ground that at first he was
Speaker 1: not even part of, but now wholeheartedly embraces because of
Speaker 1: the power that can give him. And why then would
Speaker 1: quote unquote Jews that weren't called that back then would
Speaker 1: become priests in the Catholic Church in the very beginning
Speaker 1: or of the of Christianity and lead that because of
Speaker 1: the power with the Romans that it provided. And because
Speaker 1: they were never you know, aligned with anything specific anyway,
Speaker 1: they were just going with what manipulated society. There's priest
Speaker 1: craft was always about power, right, So when they could
Speaker 1: find their niche within the system of the of Rome,
Speaker 1: they did so. And they still have that strnghold. So
Speaker 1: when you say, oh, but they're Frankist Zionist Jews over
Speaker 1: here in the banking and this is Christianity or Catholicism. No,
Speaker 1: They've been like this since since the formation.
Speaker 2: Let's see.
Speaker 1: He can eat, drink, party, get smashed, and put his
Speaker 1: blues behind him. The world is just a place he
Speaker 1: is in. It is outside and is rather threatening. It
Speaker 1: is full of foreign things. He often has to pretend
Speaker 1: he likes. It does not belong to him, and he
Speaker 1: does not and he is not its caretaker, right removed
Speaker 1: from the removed from the actual, beneffectual and changed right,
Speaker 1: useless in a sense of useless existence, superficiality in a
Speaker 1: different form. It is full of foreign things. Pretend likes it,
Speaker 1: blah blah. Caretaker that's that too, is someone else's job.
Speaker 1: Freedom makes him uneasy and board. He does not know
Speaker 1: what to do with it and prefers not to have it.
Speaker 1: He invents cunning arguments to cover the fact that what
Speaker 1: he really desires is freedom from freedom. He feigns lamentation
Speaker 1: about the absence of freedom, valor, and independence, but secretly
Speaker 1: he despises these things and is envious of those who
Speaker 1: appear to possess them. Huh. Envy is a huge trait
Speaker 1: with a certain tribe of ancient sourcers that we talk
Speaker 1: about a lot here, called the Olivas. Let's see above all,
Speaker 1: tame child does not wish to think too deeply or
Speaker 1: revitalize his own ideas of reality. He finds that he
Speaker 1: can exist without being so bothered, and this knowledge brings
Speaker 1: him great satisfaction. He discovers that society will reward him
Speaker 1: for his avoidance and lack of attention to the questions
Speaker 1: that matter, hence social media's superficiality. You will be rewarded,
Speaker 1: you will be promoted, as long as you're not talking
Speaker 1: about anything that's real and that matters, or if you do,
Speaker 1: you're adding to the problem with your opinion about it.
Speaker 1: You're making it worse by promoting the negative, the bad aspects,
Speaker 1: the controlling aspects of it. Get the shot that type
Speaker 1: of bullshit. A tame child does not need to think,
Speaker 1: because someone will always be there to tell him what
Speaker 1: to do and how to do it. The routines, uniforms, repetitiveness,
Speaker 1: and conformity are very comforting. Doing whateverbody else does and
Speaker 1: thinking as everyone else thinks is psychically elity. It is
Speaker 1: a tame child satori. Inwardly, of course, beneath the sensors
Speaker 1: of the ego, a titanic war rages, Repressed emotions seethe
Speaker 1: and boil like lava. Although tame child occasionally feels this conflict,
Speaker 1: he has been trained to ignore it. The training he
Speaker 1: has received from others has been embodied, and now he
Speaker 1: expertly trains and disciplines himself. He has far from any inner,
Speaker 1: authentic voice, and he lives on the perfery of true selfhood.
Speaker 1: He is guided by the handrails of society and not
Speaker 1: by his own, darker, dark inner voice that he believes
Speaker 1: is a dangerous source of anxiety and conflict. He hides
Speaker 1: in the light and gets busy with the phantasmogoric world
Speaker 1: of appearance. Appearance right again, superficiality, artificial, the world of appearance,
Speaker 1: not of the reality he is making friends and being
Speaker 1: active and productive. He becomes a relentless overachiever, and his
Speaker 1: many physical successes prove his virility and value. Banging chicks.
Speaker 1: That's always fun, though, who knows who doesn't want to
Speaker 1: have a high number. And I'm sure that's not all
Speaker 1: that that meant, but I'm just strein funny. He has
Speaker 1: been given his small patch of territory in the world
Speaker 1: of colors and light, and it all comes to mean
Speaker 1: a great to him, all the pretty little material in
Speaker 1: the material world. Because he is just a material girl,
Speaker 1: he too must be vigilant, and he and see to
Speaker 1: it that nothing enters to threaten the function of the
Speaker 1: machine upon which he has grown dependent. Isn't that interesting?
Speaker 1: Wasn't even part of that system? Now he's defending the
Speaker 1: machine from which he is grown dependent. Nothing short of
Speaker 1: death will make him relinquish his place, and he will
Speaker 1: arm himself against all trespassers, whether they are people or
Speaker 1: new ideas. His identification with the power of his masters
Speaker 1: is perpetually weighed against his need for their approval and
Speaker 1: against his fear of destruction at their hands. So let's
Speaker 1: not talk about the oys, because we know that they're
Speaker 1: in control of everything, So we're gonna lose a lot
Speaker 1: if we do, even though as long as we don't
Speaker 1: address it, we're gonna be constantly having less and less
Speaker 1: freedoms because of it, and less and less ability to
Speaker 1: survive with them. He decides to obey and conform and
Speaker 1: to be in the company of those people. Your your
Speaker 1: little piece of island gets smaller and smaller, right to
Speaker 1: we're balancing on your front toe to stand on dry land.
Speaker 1: His identification with the power of his master's is perpetually
Speaker 1: weighed against his need for their approval and against his
Speaker 1: fear of destruction at their hands. He decides to obey
Speaker 1: and conform and to be in the company of those
Speaker 1: people who do. Likewise, as long as he himself does
Speaker 1: not think of his conformity as conformity, and as long
Speaker 1: as his identification and allegiance is complete and inviolate, his
Speaker 1: life can proceed relatively untroubled. Yeah, he mightn't be promoted
Speaker 1: right the apocalypse. He might be promoted in job, and
Speaker 1: he might be promoted online. He might be regarded as
Speaker 1: a wonderful person with great ideas, because if you already
Speaker 1: possess that mentality, they're going they could use that to
Speaker 1: advertise and market that to others. It clearly it appears
Speaker 1: that we are relatively unaware of the pervasiveness and subtlety
Speaker 1: of the mechanisms of mass control, even though there have
Speaker 1: been many clear examples of it before our eyes during
Speaker 1: the last two hundred years. It remains a very peripheral
Speaker 1: study and not one that is commonly broached despite the eyeball.
Speaker 1: Despite this reticence and the preoccupation with more palatable subjects,
Speaker 1: there is a growing interest in the ways human beings
Speaker 1: are controlled. The reason for this slow awakening has to
Speaker 1: do with mankind, so called darker side. It is our
Speaker 1: awareness of the catalog of crime and injustice that often
Speaker 1: succeeds in promoting I'm sorry, prompting us to investigate human
Speaker 1: nature more closely. Astrologically, this need to see beneath the
Speaker 1: surface of things is ruled by the planet archetype Pluto.
Speaker 1: So he says, I don't know what that means. I
Speaker 1: don't know if I agree with that the energy represented
Speaker 1: by this planet archetype, that of destruction, ending and revelation,
Speaker 1: will be increasing in intensity during the early part of
Speaker 1: the New millennium. This increase will be experienced as very
Speaker 1: uncomfortable by people who have lived their entire lives under
Speaker 1: consensus trance and who have not developed the mental equipment
Speaker 1: to objectively critique their lifestyles or environment. Here's the problem
Speaker 1: I have with all this stuff with astrology and YadA YadA. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So first you'd have to look up in over long
Speaker 1: periods of time, map out and understand what was moving,
Speaker 1: how it moved, and then give it names. And then
Speaker 1: you have to what observe the entire mankind to see
Speaker 1: if there was a change in their mood when most
Speaker 1: things aren't expressed in verb but in mind. So, how
Speaker 1: do you apply these certain types of waves of consciousness
Speaker 1: to any particular thing up there? Because not of all,
Speaker 1: most of that stuff isn't expressed outwardly. And how do
Speaker 1: you know that that's what did it? You're just because
Speaker 1: you're staring at it. It must have some meanings. So
Speaker 1: then you apply it to the flow, the ebb and
Speaker 1: flow of human Uh, you know, consciousness. How do you
Speaker 1: know it's not some kind of terrestrial thing or something
Speaker 1: from underneath or just a trend? How do you know
Speaker 1: that that's up air has anything to do with anything
Speaker 1: It's why I don't buy into this stuff. It's like,
Speaker 1: how did you verify that?
Speaker 2: Anyhow?
Speaker 1: The challenge that plutonic not platonic, right, but plutonic Pluto
Speaker 1: energy augurs is necessary for the return of hygiene to
Speaker 1: the now very toxic collective and personal psyche. Many of
Speaker 1: the tribulations that we will see socially, politically, ideologically, and
Speaker 1: psychologically will be occurring as a result of this intestification
Speaker 1: of plutonic light. Could be magnetic fields right here, weakening, changing, altering, moving.
Speaker 1: How's that having to do with Pluto? How about would
Speaker 1: you be able to verify that? And what is Pluto?
Speaker 1: It's a name, It's a name on a dot in
Speaker 1: this frigging sky, and we don't even know what the
Speaker 1: nature of those things are. We're told, we're told in
Speaker 1: a tale by a bunch of cabbalists. Many of the
Speaker 1: tribulations that we will see socially is politically, ideological, and
Speaker 1: psychological recurring as a result of this intensification of ptonic light. Indeed,
Speaker 1: as competent astrologers know how, that's a oxymoron right there.
Speaker 1: Competent and astrologers, sorry, but it's all conjecture. It's all
Speaker 1: my feeling in my remote viewing abilities has taught me this.
Speaker 1: That's all fucking poltic bullshit. Sorry, it is as competent
Speaker 1: astrologers know. One long processional age, that of Pisces, is
Speaker 1: coming to its close. Another age, the aquarium all made
Speaker 1: up by people who make up things, is yes, you
Speaker 1: can see it there, but who has signed the names
Speaker 1: who labeled it? And if you haven't been through one
Speaker 1: of these before, and you couldn't in this lifetime, you'd
Speaker 1: have to believe something that happened what twenty six hundred
Speaker 1: years ago that somebody wrote down when there was another
Speaker 1: processional change, and what they talked about instead about and
Speaker 1: what did they find that out? There would have to
Speaker 1: be multiple ones of these things, and there would have
Speaker 1: to be a very high view looking down to see
Speaker 1: if trends were affected during these times or if they changed.
Speaker 1: They wouldn't actually probably do that anyway, So how do
Speaker 1: you assign that to h That's because that unless they
Speaker 1: know something, Unless they know something like luminaries are using
Speaker 1: us as avatars. Well, if that's the case, then okay,
Speaker 1: how do you prove that to me? Another age, Laer said,
Speaker 1: aquarium is set to begin a relatively short period of time,
Speaker 1: partially in the middle of the transitional or cusp phase.
Speaker 1: The Maya priests, the celestial timekeepers of South America refer
Speaker 1: to this period of transition as the Age of Revealing.
Speaker 1: Yet they didn't build those things, those were there, They
Speaker 1: occupied them. The author of the Book of Revelation referred
Speaker 1: to as a time of apocalypse. This word connotes the
Speaker 1: removal of a leather cover unveiling, you know, revealing, and
Speaker 1: is reference to the human persona or mask rather than
Speaker 1: to any other binding or cover. And then they do
Speaker 1: this so in the bold that says Jesus said, when
Speaker 1: you see your likeness, you're joyous. But when you see
Speaker 1: your images, which came into existence before you, which neither
Speaker 1: die nor made, are made manifest, how much will you bear?
Speaker 1: And it says what you do not bring this is
Speaker 1: gospel Thomas again, what you do not bring forth from
Speaker 1: within you will destroy you. Jesus said, whoever knows that
Speaker 1: all fails to know himself lacks everything.
Speaker 2: It's very gnostic.
Speaker 1: It's very very gnosis. No, what does it say is
Speaker 1: Delphi know thyself? Might be something important about that, because
Speaker 1: then how else can you perceive the rest of the world.
Speaker 1: If you don't know who you are, you're going to
Speaker 1: be seeing it through a very unstable foundation. The age
Speaker 1: of revealing or of apocalypse is a time when the
Speaker 1: mask of the faults are removed and when man gets
Speaker 1: his chance to see who and what he is without
Speaker 1: filter or sensor works such as this one, which you know,
Speaker 1: here's the funny part about all this, We who look
Speaker 1: for things already live in that. Doesn't that kind of
Speaker 1: seem a little bit like cheating or kind of like
Speaker 1: un fair maybe, or defeats the purpose of a lesson.
Speaker 1: If you put forth an effort to acquire a knowledge
Speaker 1: that something's going to be very obvious for everybody else
Speaker 1: who is of lesser ability of comprehension and self reflection
Speaker 1: and in deduction and you know, just overall comprehension of things.
Speaker 1: When it's when it's apparent to them, what effort did
Speaker 1: they make to achieve that information or to achieve that knowledge. None,
Speaker 1: It was just too obvious at that point. So they're
Speaker 1: still not going to really grasp how things go. They're
Speaker 1: just gonna know what the what is the end result.
Speaker 1: They're not going to understand the process of the mechanism.
Speaker 1: So they're not going to learn anything very much from that,
Speaker 1: because they're still going to be falling for the same
Speaker 1: tricks afterward, unless it somehow makes them smarter as well.
Speaker 1: Works such as this one, which delve into hidden origins,
Speaker 1: are symptomatic of the face shift into the time when
Speaker 1: men get the rare chance to find out what has
Speaker 1: been kept from them and to have the answers conjured
Speaker 1: concerning their true origins and destiny. That's very I would
Speaker 1: say that's a little obnoxious. That's a little bit This
Speaker 1: work such is you know, is symptomatic of the face shift.
Speaker 1: All this shit that you're just assuming is real and
Speaker 1: true and then saying that this book is a result
Speaker 1: of that thing happening. That seems very a cocky to me.
Speaker 1: And it's based off of what smoking mirrors that you
Speaker 1: just assume they're true. Primarily the presence of Plutonic and
Speaker 1: also Uranian energy hearkens in a spirit of rebellion. I
Speaker 1: call it a spirit defiance sounds better than me. I've
Speaker 1: been calling it that for eight years. The spirit comes
Speaker 1: to assist in the process of revelation. It also compels
Speaker 1: us to resist conformity as a result of its presence,
Speaker 1: the autocratic forces in the world that contrived to maintain
Speaker 1: well who creates the pop culture, the media, who owns
Speaker 1: the media away phase, So when something's popular, what is
Speaker 1: it that canmullar sales? And it's not his quote? But
Speaker 1: nothing true is ever popular or nothing popular is ever
Speaker 1: true the simple fact that Metallica was super popular when
Speaker 1: I was in the high school, not like them. As
Speaker 1: a result of its presence, the autocratic forces in the
Speaker 1: world contrive to maintain groupthink, and who benefit from mankind's
Speaker 1: unquestioning obedience, become even more tyrannous, tremernous, and aggressive. They
Speaker 1: manufacture more ingenious devices to ensure that people will not
Speaker 1: go a wall like tech right like transhumanism, like shots
Speaker 1: that may or may not actually install some sort of
Speaker 1: hardware and software inside you that can grow and connect
Speaker 1: to things and be easier as signals for other technology
Speaker 1: to communicate with and alter things within you, which actually
Speaker 1: goes right back to the microzime and the signals that
Speaker 1: operate it. Pluto signals major revisions in the social order,
Speaker 1: a large scale maneuvers and large scale maneuvers from the
Speaker 1: power brokers within garments, so This is kind of like
Speaker 1: that circulo logic verification, right, This trend is being is observable.
Speaker 1: But then they say it's because of Pluto. And then
Speaker 1: you still see that this thing continues to be a
Speaker 1: trend of things that are happening, this revealing and this
Speaker 1: tightening of tyranny, and then you say, well, then that
Speaker 1: must be true that Pluto is affecting it. Do you
Speaker 1: see how there's a problem there. All you did is
Speaker 1: point to something and say that's because of that. You
Speaker 1: could have said, is because of that three eyed cat
Speaker 1: in the corner. Well, the three eyed cat? What do
Speaker 1: you mean the three eyed cat? But no, this is
Speaker 1: observable that this is happening, So it must be the
Speaker 1: three eyed cat. You just picked something and pointed at it,
Speaker 1: and so that's what's causing it. The Harvest is the
Speaker 1: end of the world. So I'm real. This is Matt thirteen.
Speaker 1: Apparently the harvest is the end of the world, and
Speaker 1: the reapers are the angels. As therefore, where the terrors
Speaker 1: are gathered and burned in the fire, so shall be,
Speaker 1: so shall it be in the end of this world.
Speaker 1: See this is concerning always the end of shit. This
Speaker 1: is why this is a it's made by psychopaths and sociopaths.
Speaker 1: The son of Man shall send forth his angels, and
Speaker 1: they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that
Speaker 1: offend and them which do inequity, and shall cast them
Speaker 1: into the furnace of fired. Oh oh, okay, so right
Speaker 1: there they seem to have a thing, these hebes with
Speaker 1: furnaces and fire. I wonder why that. I wonder why
Speaker 1: that came out, came about as one of those accusations
Speaker 1: in World War two, or the six million number. These
Speaker 1: are all these are all biblical shit that they're trying
Speaker 1: to impart upon the psychologt subconscious of the people. Right
Speaker 1: in extreme cases, the presence of the spirit of I'm
Speaker 1: gonna call it defiance because that's my term, can make
Speaker 1: for radical changes affecting every facet of our lives. It
Speaker 1: can bring events to a head and demand a phase
Speaker 1: of total destruction in which all the accepted customs and
Speaker 1: idioms that we take for granted on all fronts are abolished.
Speaker 1: As said, this particular eventuality will greatly threaten and compromise
Speaker 1: the masses of people in the world who feel stripped,
Speaker 1: naked and bereft of security or purpose. You gotta fight
Speaker 1: for security, you gotta make it yourself. You gotta fight
Speaker 1: for freedom. You got to make it yourself. If you
Speaker 1: don't claim your rights, you don't have them. The initial
Speaker 1: challenges regarding the integration see that, and that's the other problem.
Speaker 1: Is it a doing or is it a happening? Because
Speaker 1: things happening to you isn't how you learn. It's being
Speaker 1: engaged in it that and being part of it and
Speaker 1: actively pursuing this or that, or being locked in and
Speaker 1: connected to a thing, not standing on the sidelines and
Speaker 1: waiting for something to happen. The initial challenge is regarding
Speaker 1: the integration of plutonic energy and the countdown to the
Speaker 1: end of the Age of Spisces involve the realization that
Speaker 1: like wild Child, societies also have their temperaments molded and fashioned.
Speaker 1: They two like are like clay upon the wheel of
Speaker 1: the potter. Wild child, however, knows his master. Society's units
Speaker 1: are not so informed. The brain, the world, and the
Speaker 1: elements of civilization operate synergistically. As the philosophers Ken Wielberter,
Speaker 1: author Blah Blah, Kessler and others have pointed out that
Speaker 1: the universal order operates as a whole archy and not
Speaker 1: a hierarchy. The same thing goes for human minds that
Speaker 1: once had a deep pore with the universal order. It
Speaker 1: is time, therefore, to reconnect the life cog with the
Speaker 1: larger and to connect reconnect the umbilical threads that join
Speaker 1: each of us to the everlasting matrix that provides all
Speaker 1: that is needed. We must obey the law of reciprocity
Speaker 1: and realize that what we sew is most definitely what
Speaker 1: we read. Okay, all that blah blah blah side. There's
Speaker 1: people who can do this and possess this, and those
Speaker 1: who can't. Those who don't need someone else to teach
Speaker 1: them what right and wrong is because they have an
Speaker 1: inert sense of that, and they already have a connection
Speaker 1: inwardly with something greater than them that they communicate with
Speaker 1: until they're shamed into not doing that anymore because they
Speaker 1: told them wrong person about it. This whole idea of
Speaker 1: the Kingdom of Heaven was within one of the gnostic
Speaker 1: things that you know, I would say, is obsoviously true
Speaker 1: idea of gnosis, your personal connection requiring no other intermediary.
Speaker 1: So this idea that someone else can tell you something
Speaker 1: and then just by that the effect of being told
Speaker 1: that the little cod with larger would reconnect. If your
Speaker 1: teather is already separated from God or whomever else, it
Speaker 1: may never, it may not be that you are a
Speaker 1: real boy. Who the fuck is talking outside? We must
Speaker 1: obey the law of reci prosty and realize that, yeah,
Speaker 1: am married to that. Like children, we have sought to
Speaker 1: prepare a dish and have exchanged sugar for salt because
Speaker 1: in our innocence we believe it because it looks like
Speaker 1: they must taste a leg. Hold on, I gotta go.
Speaker 1: Apparently there's some fuck ass at my house. Hold on,
Speaker 1: see you guys or not. Oops, I just deleted it though.
Speaker 1: My dog's losing this shit though. Just give me a moment.
Speaker 1: I'll be back. Mhm h.
Speaker 5: M.
Speaker 1: There's a big sign on our door says, don't fucking
Speaker 1: bother us. It's pretty caught and dried. It real simple,
Speaker 1: easy to read. It's actually taped over the over the
Speaker 1: doorbell so that nobody fucking rings it. And yet we
Speaker 1: still get listeners because nobody knows how to read. Did
Speaker 1: I release my spot? That would be so annoying? And
Speaker 1: I did? Ah, that's that, get fundady. I can still
Speaker 1: hear them outside, Where was that? Where was I? The brain,
Speaker 1: the world, Yeah, here it is. Okay, let's make sure
Speaker 1: we're looking at the right page together. Yep, okay. The brain,
Speaker 1: the world, and the elements of civilization operates surenergistically as
Speaker 1: the philosophers we already said all that somewhere around here.
Speaker 1: We must obey a lot of reciprocity and realize that
Speaker 1: what we saw is most definitely what we read. We
Speaker 1: must abandon this dysfunctional tendencies that bring ruin to our relationships, ourselves,
Speaker 1: and our world. Like children, we have sought to prepare
Speaker 1: a dish and have exchange sugar for salt because yeah,
Speaker 1: we heard that, because it looks like some of us
Speaker 1: tastes like So it is with our error over the
Speaker 1: likeness of love and power. Therefore, it is hardly a
Speaker 1: surprise that we are not enjoying the dish we have prepared.
Speaker 1: The dish is civilization as it now exists. We have
Speaker 1: forgotten that are sovereign. It's because we're infiltrated by a
Speaker 1: poison and a parasite, a parasitic group of individuals. O
Speaker 1: evase that in others, and there's fellow travelers and anyone
Speaker 1: else who saw an angle or an edge these well,
Speaker 1: I'm not one hundred percent on board with this whole idea,
Speaker 1: but yes, obviously the groomed I don't want to call
Speaker 1: him wild chow because I want to use I don't
Speaker 1: want to you know, I don't want to legitimize these
Speaker 1: terms of these concepts because obviously there's a lot of
Speaker 1: things wrong with his uh his uh, you know, thinking here.
Speaker 1: But yeah, reason of civilization was brought to the world
Speaker 1: by a certain group of people. Civilization was co opted
Speaker 1: and destroyed and poisoned by a different group of people.
Speaker 1: And that's what we're living in. It's a poisoned civilization.
Speaker 1: We have forgotten that our sovereignty duty, sovereign duty is
Speaker 1: to leave the world in a better condition than we
Speaker 1: each earned entered it. We have to be poor, We
Speaker 1: have been poor house guests, and should not therefore be
Speaker 1: amazed or exampful when the host penalizes us for our
Speaker 1: egregious neglect and property damage. This is where humility and
Speaker 1: true contrition are required. And again, don't assume that this
Speaker 1: applies to everybody. He should maintain that too. We're not
Speaker 1: all guilty of the crimes of the most guilty. But
Speaker 1: the people who want to talk like that want to
Speaker 1: bring everybody down, just like a religion likes to bring
Speaker 1: everybody down and call them sinners and garbage. So be
Speaker 1: careful when you're agreeing with things because you're agreeing with
Speaker 1: what you see in others. Don't apply that miss placed
Speaker 1: guilt to you if you're not part of the problem.
Speaker 1: Don't do that to yourself, because then it brings your
Speaker 1: energy down. And that's the part of this this that's
Speaker 1: part of the manipulation right there. We forgive ourselves since
Speaker 1: we understand that we acted from ignorance, and that this
Speaker 1: ignorance has its roots in the ancient past and is
Speaker 1: sinister crimes of biological invasion. That caused biological invasion. That
Speaker 1: sounds like the shots right there in the most obvious,
Speaker 1: straightforward sense. Why can't I get the end? The ends
Speaker 1: being a little end o all right? That caused deep
Speaker 1: and permanent trauma to our being. Because of that violation
Speaker 1: and trauma, we reluctantly accepted the kind of sustainable, anti
Speaker 1: natural lifestyles provided by our imperious masters. Let's read that again,
Speaker 1: in the ancient past and the sinister crimes of biological
Speaker 1: invasion that caused deep and permanent trauma to our being.
Speaker 1: Because of that violation and trauma, we reluctantly accepted the
Speaker 1: kind of unsustainable, anti natural lifestyles provided by our imperious masters,
Speaker 1: the makers of history. Makers of history. I don't know
Speaker 1: why I wouldn't take it all the way, good question. No,
Speaker 1: I don't go that way. I don't know because it's gay.
Speaker 1: I guess not correct, makers of history and the manipulators
Speaker 1: of mankind's destiny. The winding down of the Age of
Speaker 1: Pisces can hearken in a phase of cleansing and judgment
Speaker 1: for those most polluted and spiritless. It challenges all men
Speaker 1: to realize that true social and political freedom can never
Speaker 1: be made a reality unless the thinking man human mind
Speaker 1: is free. Well, if you're thinking human, why would you
Speaker 1: assume that any of this stuff has any weight to
Speaker 1: it whatsoever, because you would have to scrutinize every part
Speaker 1: of it to really be thinking and not just going
Speaker 1: along with what sounds. Oh okay, assuming that somebody who's speaking,
Speaker 1: so a matter of fact, we must know what they're
Speaker 1: talking about. No question that because they don't, they don't
Speaker 1: know what they're talking about so it says, challenges all
Speaker 1: men gee and I read this sorry to realize that
Speaker 1: true social and political freedom can never be made a
Speaker 1: reality unless the thinking human mind is free, and unless
Speaker 1: the heart and emotions are morally and mortal and hygienic.
Speaker 1: That might be a loaded bird too. So acorn crushed
Speaker 1: by the hand that plants it will not become an oak.
Speaker 1: And likewise a world order created by human devils will
Speaker 1: not become utopia. Will will be utopia for them. It
Speaker 1: depends on what you define that word as, too, because
Speaker 1: that has a lot to do with socialism and control.
Speaker 1: Thomas Mann. The ending of the age can mean the
Speaker 1: end of the machinations of warlords and aristocratic tyrants. It
Speaker 1: can harken in a time of enhance freedom for those
Speaker 1: who sorely deserve it. As a result, it may be
Speaker 1: challenging for men of the future to cope with this
Speaker 1: new found freedom and with the spirit of defiance. Rebellion
Speaker 1: sounds too much like rules for radicals. I'm sorry, I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna use it that ushers it forth. The real
Speaker 1: thing is not the same as the relative liberty or
Speaker 1: sham that we presently experience. It is not the state
Speaker 1: of being senior prefect and in prison. It's not the
Speaker 1: state of being senior prefect in prison. It is something
Speaker 1: far more rare, exceptional and fragrant. Most men souls cry
Speaker 1: out for that long lost fragrance. It is returning once more,
Speaker 1: and we'll again take root in the world after the
Speaker 1: rank weeds of cruelty and injustice are upraided in in
Speaker 1: Kart incinerated. There's that incinerated again, and we know who
Speaker 1: the bad roots are. Seems like that fire thing all
Speaker 1: over again. It doesn't never happen yet, the true origins
Speaker 1: of the secret societies, we will start their mignana, all right.
Speaker 1: That's that, just to recap. If you are over in
Speaker 1: a PJ, censorship creates superficiality, the bloodline says over on
Speaker 1: the fggmedia dot com what's up bloodlines? And again the
Speaker 1: two little green things at the top. You can do
Speaker 1: that if you want to help out the show over
Speaker 1: on Rumble you have this huge This is also over here.
Speaker 1: I mean it's it's easy to find. You scroll down,
Speaker 1: get all the links there right, nominate from Maha to
Speaker 1: help out doctor lynnon help yourself out if he actually
Speaker 1: gets in a voice in the Health and Human Services
Speaker 1: Leaping Farm behind his website, and you can get a
Speaker 1: fifty percent off of the subscription with the Ballbuster's code
Speaker 1: right there. Gifts and Go is right there. Please help
Speaker 1: with the show. Patreon for exclusive content and ad free
Speaker 1: prodcasts highly recommended. That's prettureon dot com backslash Disguise the
Speaker 1: Limits because they kicked me off as Ballbusterers, so I
Speaker 1: came back as Disguise the Limits and simper fright little.
Speaker 1: See Clicking that either of these brings you to my website.
Speaker 1: You can click doctor glynnin. From there you can click
Speaker 1: doctor Bonzo his site there. You don't need an extra code.
Speaker 1: His azure wells things right there. BB five is underneath it.
Speaker 1: Try Winter, Try Blue click for seventeen percent off your
Speaker 1: Try Blue. And that's Daisy. Daisy's the one who helped
Speaker 1: us get the Go pro and she's the one who
Speaker 1: is responsible for this road Caster pro too that I'm
Speaker 1: using right now to speak to you on. She did
Speaker 1: both of those things herself, so she's awesome and she
Speaker 1: should be thinked by everybody here to helping make this
Speaker 1: show better. Prescraft Beyond Babylon right there, Okay, these are
Speaker 1: thinking amazing things you can do Barns and Noble, Amazon,
Speaker 1: Cobo and Lulu, and of course on Amazon there's also
Speaker 1: a kindle version. If you want me to sign it,
Speaker 1: scroll down to the bottom click one of these Barnes
Speaker 1: and you'll get you're gonna have to do that, and
Speaker 1: then scroll back up to see what the price is right,
Speaker 1: price is right. So it's twenty teen ninety nine on
Speaker 1: Barnes at twenty nine nine for me and you get assigned.
Speaker 1: So little things like that, right Amazon, I'm pretty sure
Speaker 1: this is like twenty nine and it's thirty three over
Speaker 1: on unless you have some kind of prime deal or
Speaker 1: something like that, it's thirty three over there or somebody's
Speaker 1: I don't think anybody would be selling it used yet.
Speaker 1: And then there's hardcover and trust me, it's sixty thirty
Speaker 1: three over there, so fifty five ninety nine is actually
Speaker 1: pretty good. He charges ton over at Amazon. Now, hey,
Speaker 1: next person, who next time? I do to write a book,
Speaker 1: and I will do it if somebody gives me a
Speaker 1: writer stipend publish it for me so I don't have
Speaker 1: to self publish it. I'll probably be a lot cheaper
Speaker 1: through you guys than through Amazon. Everybody will win. Anybody
Speaker 1: out there publishing world twenty k, I'll write your new
Speaker 1: book create teenhco simple fryllc dot com. I take it
Speaker 1: every day and then all the hot sauce has been
Speaker 1: bitter and the new code is not advertised, so people
Speaker 1: who just land on the site get five percent off
Speaker 1: fan favorite. It's Holiday Helper. So in the in the
Speaker 1: in this right here, you'll see that it says where
Speaker 1: does it say it victory and that is still active
Speaker 1: for eleven percent off, but the Holiday Helpers and one
Speaker 1: additional percent. And I only emailed that to people. And
Speaker 1: by the way, I send out emails once a year,
Speaker 1: basically maybe twice. And I have still have assholes who
Speaker 1: actually order for my site before. And it's the only
Speaker 1: people I'm sending it to. It's people who are past customers.
Speaker 1: Some Strandberg last name, Surprise, Surprise said unsubscribed please, and
Speaker 1: it's like, it's not a fucking subscription, it's not mail chip.
Speaker 1: Just block the fucking email if you don't want to
Speaker 1: see it again. And it was just long, but I
Speaker 1: said it nicely, and I said, it's written at the
Speaker 1: bottom of what the do so please read the phrase
Speaker 1: do the email because it's personally email address. You don't
Speaker 1: know anything about marketing. If you think that blah blah
Speaker 1: blah it's better than blah blah blah, well there is
Speaker 1: no fucking umsubcribe bitch. So if you don't want to
Speaker 1: get another email, fucking hit block anyway, there's that ah.
Speaker 1: Always they always have something to say. They always have
Speaker 1: to act superior and disgusted with your existence. Fuck them, Bye,
Speaker 1: support the show, See you tomorrow