Speaker 1: Or Julian Huxley begins the book by saying something very similar,
Speaker 1: and the book begins with thanks given to a ton
Speaker 1: of globalist socialist individuals that we've talked about over the years,
Speaker 1: including people like Joseph Campbell, and Joseph Campbell is just
Speaker 1: watered down, Carl Jung, people from socialist institutes, institutes, Kettering Foundation,
Speaker 1: the Institute for Noetic Sciences, all of the elite universities,
Speaker 1: dozens of universities in fact, including Sir Jeffrey Vickers, who
Speaker 1: we saw was an important key figure in British intelligence
Speaker 1: and British operations. So a lot of Tavistock figures. We
Speaker 1: have Margaret Meade, the scammy woman who created a lot
Speaker 1: of fraudulent research about the noble savage. Rockefeller Foundation is
Speaker 1: a supporter of this. Harvard Business School, Irvin Laslow the
Speaker 1: one of the guys crew key to creating this whole
Speaker 1: quantum consciousness idea. B. F. Skinner, Carl Rodgers, and so
Speaker 1: the behaviorist school plays a key role in the production
Speaker 1: of this. So it's a lot of new physics, a
Speaker 1: lot of new age, and a lot of tapping into
Speaker 1: psycho sexual drives much along the lines of what we
Speaker 1: saw in Marilyn Ferguson's Acquiring Conspiracy, what we saw in
Speaker 1: Arthur Kessler's Ghost in the Machine, all of which we've
Speaker 1: lectured through, by the way, and other texts like bertrand Russell,
Speaker 1: all the classic all the way up to Globally stuff,
Speaker 1: all the way up to Klaus in Klaus Schwa stuff.
Speaker 1: Is the sound good or is it messing up again?
Speaker 1: It messed up again? I wonder if it's the It
Speaker 1: couldn't because I'm playing to playing, like playing music and
Speaker 1: playing this at the same time. Is this if I'm
Speaker 1: still talking? If I'm talking, is it doing it? It's
Speaker 1: not lagging. I don't know what it must be the mike, Oh,
Speaker 1: Caleb is behind. Okay, that's what it is. He's behind
Speaker 1: and he's making me think it's still going on. I
Speaker 1: was about to freak out, like, what the hell, dude,
Speaker 1: We're never going to get through this book. So the
Speaker 1: book begins by saying that we're gonna have to retool
Speaker 1: and re engineer the worldview of particularly Western man and
Speaker 1: the American man, and it's cite some texts I didn't expect,
Speaker 1: like Merkilla Iliada and his idea of symbolism. I've actually
Speaker 1: read quite a bit of Merchis Aliata. He has some
Speaker 1: very interesting insights. But the book is very candid when
Speaker 1: it opens up by saying that it's time to retool
Speaker 1: and re engineer a man's view of himself and man's
Speaker 1: view of society. And we're going to do that. Get
Speaker 1: this through manipulation of archetypes and archetypal images, something that
Speaker 1: we've talked about a lot. I didn't realize that this
Speaker 1: book is essentially about that. In the first half, man
Speaker 1: is one with nature and one with ecology, and man
Speaker 1: must be re engineered to understand through social engineering that
Speaker 1: he is a member of the whole and a piece
Speaker 1: of the ecological society in which we live. So ecology
Speaker 1: will be put at the forefront. It will be thrust
Speaker 1: into the most important way to see and to study
Speaker 1: and to place man in society. The book talks about
Speaker 1: and as we said, this is like a graduate level text.
Speaker 1: It talks about all the different areas that research was
Speaker 1: done for this book, including hypnosis, behavioral studies, and behavioral engineering.
Speaker 1: So the social engineers, for example, the relationship between teachers
Speaker 1: and students, the relationship about placebos, hypnosis, psychotropic drugs, sensory deprivation.
Speaker 1: This is all mk ultra stuff. Studies of authoritarianism, the
Speaker 1: authoritarian personality disorder, that's Frankfurt school stuff. And some of
Speaker 1: these people are frank for school people. Group dynamics that's
Speaker 1: Tavistock stuff. Esoteric religious teachings, studying Eastern and Western esotericism,
Speaker 1: page four. All of these will be used to create
Speaker 1: a new worldview and a new prejudice for new cultural archetypes.
Speaker 1: And they hypothesize different studies, and they give you these
Speaker 1: graphs talking about how the emergence of new archetypes and
Speaker 1: images are able to train and to steer man. So
Speaker 1: if you would, by the way, guys that hit like
Speaker 1: and share, Yes, the Aquiring Conspiracy is a related text.
Speaker 1: It's actually mentioned in this book. If you want to
Speaker 1: support the stream, you can do so through super chats
Speaker 1: through stream labs. The link is penned in the chat.
Speaker 1: It's also in the show description stream labs, and then
Speaker 1: you can also natively chat through YouTube. So they studied
Speaker 1: everything from infant mortality to systems analysis to economics, and
Speaker 1: this book will deal with all of those in a
Speaker 1: series of chapters. I think concluding in how to Transform. So,
Speaker 1: for example, it's a totality perspective, full spectrum dominance studies
Speaker 1: of man himself in a changing society, man's formative archetypes
Speaker 1: and images in his place in the universe. Its specifically
Speaker 1: the American creed, economic man, science, ecology, evolution, sociology, and
Speaker 1: strategies of transformation. So this is again a high level
Speaker 1: textbook for the graduate study elites going into think tanks, foundations, Pentagon, government,
Speaker 1: et cetera, or intelligence operations and intelligence work as well. Religion,
Speaker 1: it says, is relevant because modern scientism has discarded religion. However,
Speaker 1: the religion that the book wants us take to come
Speaker 1: back to is definitely not anything close to Biblical religion,
Speaker 1: Western civilizations heritage, Eurasian heritage as well. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: that has to be discarded because it's too fallow centric.
Speaker 1: The religion that they want us to move into is
Speaker 1: something akin to a pro New Age, pro goddess, pro
Speaker 1: ecological based religion that tries to balance the sexes, promote
Speaker 1: gender equality, promote feminism, etc. All that is mentioned in
Speaker 1: the text as a way to counter balance the last
Speaker 1: couple millennia of fall logo centrism. In fact, the book
Speaker 1: says that even in nineteen eighty two, most religions in America,
Speaker 1: including churches and synagogues, had merely become tools of social justice.
Speaker 1: They are essentially social justice organizations. So they need to
Speaker 1: capture that engine, in that soft power, to turn it
Speaker 1: towards the creation of new archetypes and new images. And
Speaker 1: that is everything that we're seeing today. So everything from
Speaker 1: feminism to the lesbian Archbishop of Canterbury, to the gay
Speaker 1: flags and the churches and all of that is not
Speaker 1: just an effect of the social Gospel and Protestant liberalism
Speaker 1: of the last century. It's actually steered and engineered for
Speaker 1: social engineering purposes. That this book is talking about the
Speaker 1: reason for all of this. It says on pages ten
Speaker 1: and eleven, and it cites Jonas Salk's book Survival of
Speaker 1: the Wisest, which we have lectured through many many years ago.
Speaker 1: It's a very important text. I had to put it
Speaker 1: somewhere else off of YouTube. It wasn't allowed to be
Speaker 1: on YouTube. And you can guess why. The Wiseness is
Speaker 1: about the necessity for the scientific elite to engage in
Speaker 1: mass deepop, and the deepop will be necessary because there's
Speaker 1: not enough resources. So Malthusianism, we're going back to flies
Speaker 1: in a jar. And because the flies in a jar
Speaker 1: couldn't they didn't have enough food, we got to get
Speaker 1: rid of most of the people. This getting rid of
Speaker 1: and deep, this will take a long time. They're not
Speaker 1: envisioning some sort of apocalyptic all at once thing, although
Speaker 1: they try to scare everybody that if we don't do this,
Speaker 1: there will be the apocalyptic climate event, nukes, et cetera.
Speaker 1: It says, let's go back to the history of Western
Speaker 1: civilization and the changing images of man throughout Western civilization's history,
Speaker 1: and perhaps we'll get an idea of how they did
Speaker 1: it back then and how we will do it today.
Speaker 1: In ancient societies and in the empire, the Roman Empire
Speaker 1: or whatever it was, the literate priest class that had
Speaker 1: the power, and the priest class could teach. They could
Speaker 1: be the pedagogical elite to the king class. For example,
Speaker 1: Aristotle being the tutor to you know, Alexander the Great,
Speaker 1: et cetera. It's not saying that everybody in the priest
Speaker 1: class literally is a priest. It's just calling that class
Speaker 1: of people the literati, the ones that are literate, kind
Speaker 1: of the elites, and they would carry on the they
Speaker 1: would be the culture bearers, so to speak. And these
Speaker 1: this society saw things holistically. It saw nature as magical
Speaker 1: and endued with a kind of an enchantment. Everything was
Speaker 1: seen as part of a whole. So, for example, if
Speaker 1: you read Marcus Aurelius's meditations, which we've lectured through on
Speaker 1: this channel, this would be a good example example of this.
Speaker 1: Even though he's not a priest class person, he's the
Speaker 1: stoic philosopher emperor, and so he's kind of both right.
Speaker 1: He's writing about the empire giving the people order and
Speaker 1: reason in the same way that the logos principle that
Speaker 1: pervades the universe gives everything order and reason in nature.
Speaker 1: So the Roman Empire is the most logical rational expression
Speaker 1: of the universe's logos in the way that Marcus Aurelius thought.
Speaker 1: The text also cites other societies like ancient Eastern societies, Hindus, Yogi's, Brahmins, etc.
Speaker 1: And it says, this is where we need to turn,
Speaker 1: So we need to look away from the things that
Speaker 1: Western civilization had through the influence of Greek philosophy and
Speaker 1: patriarchal dominance, etc. We need to look to Yogi's and
Speaker 1: the sages of the Eastern religions because they were eco
Speaker 1: logical sages that will be perfect for the future. Hinduism, Taoism,
Speaker 1: et cetera. Were in certain ways superior to Yahweh, were
Speaker 1: the god of the Bible, and even the Gnostics had
Speaker 1: certain insights. Now, don't get me wrong. To be fair
Speaker 1: to the text, it's not actually saying that everything about
Speaker 1: Western civilization was bad. It's kind of doing this pick
Speaker 1: and choose method where it's saying, Okay, there's some things
Speaker 1: about Western Western civilization that were good. The idea of
Speaker 1: Faustian man having dominance over nature and creating techne technology
Speaker 1: that was good and it got us to where we are.
Speaker 1: But there's all these drawbacks from technological society, and now
Speaker 1: we need to de industrialize. You see, the West has
Speaker 1: caused all these problems and now we're gonna have to
Speaker 1: move to a post industrial world. And the way to
Speaker 1: get to a post industrial world is to socially engineer,
Speaker 1: using the ideology of Fabian socialism and all of these
Speaker 1: universities brainwashing techniques to inculcate in the population demasculinization, the
Speaker 1: raising of the feminine, the goddess, the New Age cults, ecology,
Speaker 1: nature worship, Taoism, yoga, all that kind of stuff is
Speaker 1: a manifestation of this. Now, this book shows you that
Speaker 1: all of these religious ideas are intentionally pushed in the
Speaker 1: West on purpose. Just like Change Acquiring Conspiracy by Marilyn Ferguson,
Speaker 1: which is not a conspiracy book, it's saying the exact
Speaker 1: same thing as this book. For example, in the chapter
Speaker 1: on the notion of the Mystical Body of Christ and Christianity,
Speaker 1: the authors actually say, this is not necessarily a bad idea.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have to resuscitate the ancient theological idea of
Speaker 1: the mystical body of Christ. However, it's not gonna be
Speaker 1: about Christianity or Jesus. It's the mystical body of mankind,
Speaker 1: one with nature.
Speaker 2: They say.
Speaker 1: And it talks about the influence of Freemasonry and Gnosticism
Speaker 1: in the West, and it even makes the claim it
Speaker 1: argues that Gnosticism its traditions were continued on in the
Speaker 1: free Masonic lodges. It's not totally saying we need to
Speaker 1: go to Freemasonry. It's kind of trying to be a
Speaker 1: perennialist thing, right. It's saying, all of these religions, all
Speaker 1: these things have good things, and let's do an archaeology
Speaker 1: of ideas and piece together what we want from all
Speaker 1: of these traditions in our new socialist, technocratic future. And
Speaker 1: the best thing to get to that future would be
Speaker 1: to have a new religious sentiment, a new religious idea
Speaker 1: that the priests class, the literati, the academic class will construct.
Speaker 1: What is the chat talking about? What are you guys
Speaker 1: talking about? This is a really important text that you
Speaker 1: guys need to pay attention. Right, I'm gonna start being
Speaker 1: like scam shamou and start screaming at you. Hey a
Speaker 1: ted shut. So they go, they go all the way
Speaker 1: back to the Greeks after talking about the yogis and ecology,
Speaker 1: and they start talking about what elements did Greek philosophers
Speaker 1: and Greek society give to the West. It gave us
Speaker 1: the idea of individualism, the hero Odysseus, right, virtue, excellence.
Speaker 1: Plato and Aristotol were a move away from the supernatural
Speaker 1: towards nature and the study of nature. So science essentially
Speaker 1: comes out of this enterprise, and then it fast forwards
Speaker 1: all the way up through like the Enlightenment and all
Speaker 1: that kind of stuff and trostant reformation and scientific revolution,
Speaker 1: and it says we're at the stage now where man
Speaker 1: himself is being studied at every level, not just in
Speaker 1: terms of his mind, but his brain itself to be
Speaker 1: perhaps changed. And as we as we said in the
Speaker 1: almost stream yesterday trying to cover this book, this really
Speaker 1: anticipates where modern documents like the NATO Cognitive Warfare document
Speaker 1: would take it to the next level, because this document
Speaker 1: is talking about changing man's mindset, his worldview. The NATO
Speaker 1: Cognitive Warfare Document is saying it's time to take it
Speaker 1: to the next page, to the next level and change
Speaker 1: man's brain himself, change man's brain capabilities. We are on
Speaker 1: page thirty and the key research for this comes out
Speaker 1: of mk Ultra behavior alteration. Electrodes in the brain are
Speaker 1: mentioned in this in this area, so we're referring to
Speaker 1: Jose Delgado. In fact, Jose Delgado is cited one of
Speaker 1: the Mkultra doctors on page thirty and they Gatto's book
Speaker 1: is physical Control of the Mind, Mind Control. I have
Speaker 1: the book, so man will have to be mind controlled
Speaker 1: through operant conditioning. And that's why BF. Skinner also cited
Speaker 1: right next to Jose Delgado in the same page here
Speaker 1: as to where and how we will take me in
Speaker 1: in this new direction, what could be one of the
Speaker 1: key vehicles of that perhaps perennial philosophy. So I didn't
Speaker 1: expect this in the book. We're now talking about freetof Shoon,
Speaker 1: We're talking about Reneganon, We're talking about even Aldus Huxley's
Speaker 1: version of the perennial philosophy. This is the traditionalist school.
Speaker 1: And that actually makes sense because there are many amongst
Speaker 1: the power structure who do find perennialism appealing and useful.
Speaker 1: For example, King Charles is the patron for a perennialist
Speaker 1: traditionalist publishing company called Teminos and so. And I'm not
Speaker 1: saying everything about the pronouns are bad. They're just kind
Speaker 1: of like neo platonic, you know, Sufi, that kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: In fact, doctor Phillip Cherard, the Orthodox theologian writer, seemed
Speaker 1: to drift, unfortunately towards the latter days of his life
Speaker 1: into kind of perennialism. I don't know that he died
Speaker 1: outside the Orthodox Church, but his Orthodox theology was beginning
Speaker 1: to drift away into some pretty bad stuff. I've read
Speaker 1: a lot of Cherard. I'm trying to remember the name
Speaker 1: of one of his later texts. Uh I forget the
Speaker 1: name of it. But one of his later text is
Speaker 1: very perennialists, which is which is kind of unfortunate, but
Speaker 1: you know, this is people like Julius Evela and this
Speaker 1: kind of stuff. Mark Sedgwick, I think, doesn't a modern
Speaker 1: perennialist blog. This guy here, so he studies Sufism, and
Speaker 1: a lot of the traditionalist pronouns are into Sufism. Some
Speaker 1: of them, like freetof shoe On, they create, they create
Speaker 1: their own cults, right, and Reneganon was a part of
Speaker 1: his cult for a while, but he used to. He
Speaker 1: has a blog called the Traditionalist Blog. And I've read
Speaker 1: this off and on over the years. I mean, I think,
Speaker 1: you know, at one time I wasn't into perennials per se,
Speaker 1: but I was. I was reading these people at one point.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 1: I even read, you know, all of Yaqui's Imperium. I've
Speaker 1: read two or three of Evel's books. So I've read
Speaker 1: Kumar Swami's essays. Ananda Kumraswami, Kumaswami. So there's quite a
Speaker 1: few figures in this, loosely speaking, in this domain, but
Speaker 1: the most famous names are going to be shou On
Speaker 1: Ganan and Evela. And then people debate whether Elvis Huxley
Speaker 1: really counts as the perennialist. But if you don't recall,
Speaker 1: I actually did a debate with a perennialist, that oddball
Speaker 1: dude Arval many years ago. If you guys remember our
Speaker 1: Arval is suddenly on all these podcasts everywhere, this oddball here.
Speaker 1: So we debated perennialism. How many years ago, maybe seven
Speaker 1: or eight years ago. It was one of the early
Speaker 1: first debates, So if you're interested, you can check that out.
Speaker 1: But at the time Arbal was claiming he was interested
Speaker 1: in perennialism. I don't know if he still is. The
Speaker 1: last time that we had a bit of a disagreement,
Speaker 1: he was all into Richard Dawkins. So I don't know
Speaker 1: where he's at now having kept up with him, but
Speaker 1: I think he probably also is trying to create a
Speaker 1: Renegan onto you on type of community. Yes, Julius Evil
Speaker 1: as I said, as one of the sort of the
Speaker 1: main figures in this anyway. So I didn't really expect
Speaker 1: this book to go in that direction, but that's where
Speaker 1: it went. And uh, it doesn't exactly say, oh, we're
Speaker 1: going to use it, just says that, you know, it's
Speaker 1: kind of serving different options and maybe perennialism could be
Speaker 1: a way to craft and concoct, you know, kind of
Speaker 1: a new world religion, that kind of thing. So the
Speaker 1: next section deals primarily with America and the American Creed,
Speaker 1: the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, direct relation of independence,
Speaker 1: the American ethos of leips a, fair economics, becoming your
Speaker 1: own you know, man, pull yourself up at your bootstraps,
Speaker 1: start your own business, the American dream, all of this,
Speaker 1: and they say that, you know what's interesting. Let me
Speaker 1: put this, this section is a two edged sword because
Speaker 1: many of the critiques are the critiques that we would make,
Speaker 1: because this is a it started cracking again. Dang, I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna have to get a revenue mic. I'm just
Speaker 1: it's time to just go out and buy a new
Speaker 1: micro And also, is it possible it's also maybe YouTube.
Speaker 1: I mean YouTube doesn't show me any it's not showing
Speaker 1: me any. Oh, when I lean in maybe I'm electric electrified.
Speaker 2: Maybe I'll have LEO.
Speaker 1: Well, it's time to get a nice fancy microphone anyway,
Speaker 1: so I'm just gonna go ahead. It's really bad. It's
Speaker 1: the interface, not the micro so obs you mean.
Speaker 2: M hm.
Speaker 3: Oh all right.
Speaker 1: Let me try. Let's try it. Maybe if we turned.
Speaker 3: Down some of the stuff here, let's see, all right?
Speaker 1: Is that better? Am I am? I still crackling? If
Speaker 1: it's lower? Yeah, We've already tried messing with the USB
Speaker 1: port and we thought we had it solved. But it
Speaker 1: seems it's bad again. It's worse. Yeah, I'm gonna have
Speaker 1: to get Neil in here, and Neil can set me
Speaker 1: up a whole system of next level fanciness. Put your
Speaker 1: phone in airplane mode. That's actually not a bad idea.
Speaker 1: But I think it is an airplane mode. Oh, I
Speaker 1: mean there was no problems until yesterday, all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: So I don't know what happened. Just I don't know
Speaker 1: where it happened yesterday. Okay, maybe we can keep going.
Speaker 1: I think I might just need a new mic. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is not that old, but it has traveled a
Speaker 1: little bit. I've used it for maybe a year, so
Speaker 1: what I'm saying is that you have to narrow it
Speaker 1: down because I don't exactly know what the problem is.
Speaker 1: So I bought a whole new fancy USB port, but
Speaker 1: that's apparently not it okay, So maybe we can at
Speaker 1: least finish through this live stream. If you guys want
Speaker 1: to donate to the Fancy Mic fund, leave me a
Speaker 1: super chat and I'll go ahead and just buy a brand
Speaker 1: new fancy mic and I'll have to get audio switch
Speaker 1: or whatever. I already I put a brand new cord in,
Speaker 1: so I bought like three backup cords. I tried everything
Speaker 1: I could think of to prepare for issues. But so
Speaker 1: Americanism is America is a pluralist enterprise, and a lot
Speaker 1: of the things that that he says we would agree
Speaker 1: with in terms of criticizing. But the problem is that
Speaker 1: we don't agree with the perennialist answers. So the answer
Speaker 1: isn't orthodox Christianity. The answer is actually to have a
Speaker 1: new constructed religion. And I'm not knocking or hating on
Speaker 1: Jordan Peterson. I think a lot of people are, you know,
Speaker 1: worried about Jordan Peterson's health and all that, And I
Speaker 1: certainly want the best for Jordan Peterson. I hope he
Speaker 1: finds his way and you know, gets healed. But the
Speaker 1: the other thing is that this chapter and what they
Speaker 1: have planned it sounds a lot like the sort of
Speaker 1: Jordan Peterson archaeology of ideas model to try to concoct
Speaker 1: a new religion. I don't even know what the buffer is.
Speaker 1: If you guys know what I'm talking about, So like
Speaker 1: if you, if you could tell me, is that in OBS,
Speaker 1: like in the OBS setting, Like if I go to
Speaker 1: source settings or global settings, like I don't see. I
Speaker 1: think you can go into OBS also, not in the properties,
Speaker 1: but in the stream itself. I think you have to
Speaker 1: turn the stream off though, and you can pick like
Speaker 1: the audio rate at which you're sending out the audio feed?
Speaker 1: Is that it in OBS? I think I'm might have
Speaker 1: to turn it off to do that, though, No, I think, look,
Speaker 1: I just can't change it. So the audio I've got
Speaker 1: it at sample rate forty four point one. Killer hurts.
Speaker 1: I don't know anything about killer hurts.
Speaker 2: Let's see the stream.
Speaker 1: I can't look at the stream because I'm doing it
Speaker 1: at the moment. Output audio is audio bit rate is
Speaker 1: one that's audio tracks? Is this audio track one. This
Speaker 1: is audio capture two. Replace buffer is that it increase
Speaker 1: input output buffer. I've already sourched the USB boards.
Speaker 2: It's not stream deck. Donate to my new I mean,
Speaker 2: I'm in the settings of.
Speaker 1: Stream labs and it's I'm looking at audio output, et cetera.
Speaker 1: Output mode. Replay buffer is that what you're talking about
Speaker 1: with buffers? Bigger buffer size is better? Is that the
Speaker 1: maximum replay time on to replay buffer.
Speaker 2: Because that's the only thing I see. I don't see
Speaker 2: any other options.
Speaker 1: So philosophy tries to deal with these issues, and these
Speaker 1: philosophical questions are paramount, its paramo. These kinds of audio
Speaker 1: of philosophy questions are absolutely essential. Even though modern atheism
Speaker 1: is not interested in Modern Americanism and scientism has moved
Speaker 1: away from.
Speaker 2: These philosophical questions.
Speaker 1: But it's time to find the mystical core of the religions.
Speaker 1: So it is perennialism and to try to convince man
Speaker 1: that man is not distinct and separate from nature, to
Speaker 1: dominating nature. But man is nature, he's not above it,
Speaker 1: and thus the biblical idea must be fought against it,
Speaker 1: says I just tried. I tried a new wire. So
Speaker 1: I think it might be this microphone because I've already
Speaker 1: placed I've tried multiple chords. It's still Yeah, it's done
Speaker 1: on purpose, as part of an aesthetic that we're doing.
Speaker 1: Because I apologize, I'll just buy a new microphone tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Go to the advanced audio properties in the mixer and
Speaker 1: adjust the audio offset settings. There's non advanced setting in
Speaker 1: there's source settings in global settings. That's it. There's nothing
Speaker 1: about advance in here. Oh I'm in advanced.
Speaker 2: Settings and you said to do what.
Speaker 1: In the mixer ad just the audio offset settings audio
Speaker 1: off settings? Oh, sync offset? What do I put that to?
Speaker 1: Maybe delay it for like two or three seconds? Is
Speaker 1: that what you mean? Sink offset audio offset settings? Okay,
Speaker 1: I see the sink offset. I think that's what you're
Speaker 1: talking about. Is that any better? I tried putting it
Speaker 1: to like two seconds. That won't fix it. I've already
Speaker 1: debated all the vegans. Okay, it got better moving the wire.
Speaker 1: So that's it. It's got to be the microphone. It's
Speaker 1: a stupid ass microphone. It's not the cord Art. This
Speaker 1: is a brand new cord. I've tried two chords, so
Speaker 1: so it's not the sync offset. Okay, it's this stupid microphone, dude,
Speaker 1: I know that's where it is. No, it's there's nothing
Speaker 1: wrong with it. It's just I mean, maybe I dropped
Speaker 1: it when we were moving or something, or when we
Speaker 1: were traveling. I might have hit it. It got banged
Speaker 1: in the bag or something, my audio video bag of
Speaker 1: tech stuff. Maybe it got banged in there. And so
Speaker 1: it's I don't have anti virus on here. So what's
Speaker 1: the key here? Collectivism? So we want to turn into
Speaker 1: a collectivist institution in society versus an individualist one. The
Speaker 1: main issue with Americanism was its individualism. And we would
Speaker 1: agree that there's an over emphasis out of the Enlightenment,
Speaker 1: the Laise Fair economic theory, out of mystic individualism, out
Speaker 1: of the liverty and ethos. But their answer is, oh,
Speaker 1: we'll see, we're all just part of nature, bro, We're
Speaker 1: all one, bro. And how do we get to that?
Speaker 1: We have to demasculinize the West and particularly America. Boy
Speaker 1: were they prescient, and boy were they planning it in
Speaker 1: this one? Weren't they? Man is nature? And thus even
Speaker 1: old people should be indoctrinated to learn from the Yogis
Speaker 1: and the mystics of the East because they were holistic.
Speaker 1: By the way, this is exactly what fre Capra says
Speaker 1: in his book, which we've covered, freedof Copra. If you
Speaker 1: remember he wrote Turning Point that was one of the
Speaker 1: globally texts. It's exactly the same thing that Copra said. Christianity,
Speaker 1: it says, has too positive of a assessment of man
Speaker 1: and of man's role. It's too colonialist. It gives the
Speaker 1: idea that we should raise and help other cultures. You
Speaker 1: can't make this up. They actually say that colonialism is bad,
Speaker 1: and I think it's cites Margaret Meade. You're gonna think
Speaker 1: this is crazy, But this is, by the way, where
Speaker 1: where we get to critical race theory and anti colonial insanity.
Speaker 1: Colonialism is bad because it actually makes tribes people want things.
Speaker 1: So when you bring in clothing to a culture that
Speaker 1: wears grass skirts, now you've introduced greed because everyone wants
Speaker 1: the grass skirt. And the industrial revolution is a big
Speaker 1: part of this because it made ease of access to
Speaker 1: these consumable goods and to these better quality goods so
Speaker 1: much more prevalent that it has to be curved. You
Speaker 1: can't keep having this growth society they say, they cite
Speaker 1: John Mayner Kanes in fact as a prophet, and it
Speaker 1: canes as fabian socialism. And there's too much abundance in society.
Speaker 1: Since humans are nature, we've got to stop wealth and growth.
Speaker 1: So you notice it's a subtle socialism. It's a post
Speaker 1: industrialist de industrial society. And perhaps even feudalism is something
Speaker 1: we could look back to. Neo feudalism. Colonialism gave the
Speaker 1: tribes people too many things that made them want This
Speaker 1: is so stupid. Imagine thinking that bringing food and running
Speaker 1: water and buildings to people that live in huts, you're
Speaker 1: bad because you're making people want stuff. That's actually the
Speaker 1: logic of Margaret Mede and this chapter. The industrial created
Speaker 1: this image of man as the Patrick Bateman. Oh, you're
Speaker 1: the evil, psychopathic Wall Street bro. And rather than that,
Speaker 1: we need to turn into hippie bros. You need to
Speaker 1: become a look at the festival. A post industrial world
Speaker 1: would be much better because it would be a collectivist,
Speaker 1: socialist kind of society where people would no longer see
Speaker 1: themselves as independent go getters, self motivated entrepreneurs, all this
Speaker 1: kind of stuff that's all bad. Let me read you
Speaker 1: this concluding section here because it was very telling as
Speaker 1: to what the book and the plans really are. A
Speaker 1: meaningful existence. Well, let me start up with this quote
Speaker 1: the Prospects for the future. This is our conclusion. Material
Speaker 1: abundance is associated with the industrial era. It has not
Speaker 1: been acquired without tremendous costs. However, a company of industrialism
Speaker 1: is the erosion of Western man's sense of the cosmological.
Speaker 1: Contemporary man no longer sees himself as nature. Naturally, he
Speaker 1: was a member of a whole in ancient medieval societies,
Speaker 1: and thus he was part of a meaningful plan of
Speaker 1: existence within the totality of a cosmic order. Post industrial Revolution,
Speaker 1: post Enlightenment, post scientific revolution, post Darwin, man has lost meaning,
Speaker 1: maps of meaning. You know what's your meaning? Again? Very Petersonian.
Speaker 1: Meaningful existence is largely derived from the existence of and
Speaker 1: the congruence between the human beings, relationship to himself, society,
Speaker 1: and the universe. Although it is profitable, the Industrial Revolution
Speaker 1: thus was very costly as it left men alienated and
Speaker 1: in varying degrees, is alienated from his sources of meaning.
Speaker 1: The mysteries of the cosmos have seemingly been displaced by
Speaker 1: cold rationality and science. A sense of community has been
Speaker 1: displaced by the incomprehensible urban existence. Social pressures have created
Speaker 1: an other directed mentality, such that many are alienated, even
Speaker 1: from themselves. This would suggest the next phase of social
Speaker 1: evolution is the reintegration of man and the phase of
Speaker 1: our social evolution to his sources of meaning. Well, where
Speaker 1: we're going to find meaning? Guess what they're going to
Speaker 1: give you your new meaning? Your new meaning will be
Speaker 1: as a piece of the whole, as a collect as
Speaker 1: a as a member of Mother Gaya, Mother Earth. Social
Speaker 1: pressures have created this other directed mentality. We are all alienated.
Speaker 1: We must be reintegrated into what the continued extension of
Speaker 1: the industrial state is poorly suited to give man meaning.
Speaker 1: We are challenged now to look at the technological material
Speaker 1: frontier of a new American frontier, which is essentially that
Speaker 1: of man searching for himself. So the American creed must
Speaker 1: die because it basically produced Patrick Bateman, the nihilistic psycho
Speaker 1: Wall Street bro. And now it's time to find a
Speaker 1: new image, which will be Aubrey Marcus. I guess the
Speaker 1: new bro that we're supposed to look to is like
Speaker 1: Aubrey Marcus bro because man is now finding his meaning
Speaker 1: as some sort of DMT bro shaman psycho la. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's unclear where exactly they're going to go, but that's
Speaker 1: kind of the vibe that we get from this guy.
Speaker 4: Right, Sacred relationships man, Like sacred relationships bro.
Speaker 1: Now, if you remember Aubrey Marcus, I think didn't he
Speaker 1: do like an apology to women or they bowed down
Speaker 1: before the women to promote whatever his ethos is. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm just that's the first guy that pops in my
Speaker 1: mind as to who the the kind of guy they're
Speaker 1: talking about here is. They don't say, They just kind
Speaker 1: of give it as like the the mystic shaman, you know,
Speaker 1: festival bro kind of dude. Another example, I was watching
Speaker 1: this documentary for the next Sam Hide episode. I think
Speaker 1: it was this one way.
Speaker 5: Again, it's important that I emphasize a few disclaimers. By
Speaker 5: no means am I calling the individuals mentioned in this
Speaker 5: video scammers. Consider what you are about.
Speaker 1: Now, this wasn't it here it is? It's this one.
Speaker 1: I watched this documentary about gurus in California. It's pretty funny,
Speaker 1: it was. It's kind of an annoying kind of AI video,
Speaker 1: but it actually was. I mean, the audio is like
Speaker 1: an AI, but if somebody actually made it, it's a
Speaker 1: legit documentary. And it reminded me of exactly what we're
Speaker 1: talking about here, the kind of man and the people
Speaker 1: that are envisioned by changing images of man. Are these
Speaker 1: people and you know, festival types, this kind of people, right, psychonat.
Speaker 6: Ros sort of pilgrimage to learn about the latest new
Speaker 6: age trends and to meet others who share the same values.
Speaker 1: This guy, the I'm gonna walk around in my underwear guy.
Speaker 1: This is the changing images of man man, right, and
Speaker 1: you don't have to be into the I mean, maybe
Speaker 1: destiny is another version of the changing images of man man.
Speaker 1: All right, So the next chapter, I'll give you guys
Speaker 1: this documentary body by the way, if you want like
Speaker 1: an interesting insight into what the California Newagers have been
Speaker 1: up to. And there, let me tell you they are
Speaker 1: not doing well. Six of Spades, ten dollars boomer Tech
Speaker 1: issues day number two. Well, next time you see me,
Speaker 1: I'll have a brand new, fancy mic and maybe we'll
Speaker 1: maybe we'll affix it itto tokein What's Up? Man became
Speaker 1: a member Daniel Schrouder twenty dollars. This is for all
Speaker 1: your fourth hour content with Lord Voltimore over the years.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Danil appreciate that. Uh oh well mindfulness festival
Speaker 1: or a country mindful as fast, all mindful.
Speaker 7: Don't be mindless, be mind because not only is there music,
Speaker 7: dude is so freaking spiritual or whatever. It's like, oh
Speaker 7: my gosh, it's like I'm so spiritual that I'm not
Speaker 7: even physical right now, Like I just like walk through
Speaker 7: like walls and pylons and shit, because they're like, I'm
Speaker 7: not even physical right now. I'm just straight up sarshal
Speaker 7: or whatever. And by the way, changing images of man
Speaker 7: and by the way, that own.
Speaker 1: Theory, right. But there's also workshops, there's opportunities to come
Speaker 1: and learn about specific modes and modalities of wellness.
Speaker 2: I get into a position.
Speaker 1: I like all the New Age bros acting like charismatics,
Speaker 1: like the New Age brols rolling around and acting like
Speaker 1: dogs and babies is no different than like the charismatic churches.
Speaker 5: Think is very awkward and you do not normally engage
Speaker 5: in and start moving like that.
Speaker 1: They're trying to fly, dudes, Like I could fly right now.
Speaker 8: I'm so high on molly, I could fly if I
Speaker 8: try right now.
Speaker 6: Philosophy of the class to return to your natural state and.
Speaker 1: Maintain awareness, and see how you can. They're wearing a skirt,
Speaker 1: Is that they wearing a kilt? You can move through everything.
Speaker 1: Look at these idiots. What a bunch of goofballs.
Speaker 5: Feel that feel out.
Speaker 1: A man. This is all the guys in my chat
Speaker 1: right now. This is what they're doing right now.
Speaker 6: Of the new age must step into his animal natures.
Speaker 4: Bro.
Speaker 1: Bro, you're so going to weep right now. If you
Speaker 1: just totally like weep right now, it'd be like the
Speaker 1: most masculine thing.
Speaker 4: Bro.
Speaker 1: If you're stepping deeper into truth, so you can find
Speaker 1: your truth.
Speaker 8: Bro, look within, find your truth and then like just
Speaker 8: like stay there or whatever, like don't come back. Displayed
Speaker 8: dominance and these destructive behaviors that it's like got men
Speaker 8: have been trained to display dominance in these masculine, toxic behavior.
Speaker 6: This workshop for the first time.
Speaker 4: Being with other men.
Speaker 1: This is gay camp, dude. This is like gay camp
Speaker 1: right here. Welcome to gay camp in an environment where
Speaker 1: there's not alpha dynamics and men that are trying to
Speaker 1: display dominance and these destructive behaviors.
Speaker 8: That it's just like there's no alpha dynamics.
Speaker 1: Bro keep me away from there, I would be excommunicated.
Speaker 1: To me, I'll be the first dude excommunicator. Find your
Speaker 1: inner kitten baby exactly. So to get back to changing
Speaker 1: images of man, the next chapter is about science, and
Speaker 1: science is very important because science is the ethos of
Speaker 1: the modern era. We live in the scientism scientific paradigm,
Speaker 1: and they actually kind of admit that scientism is kind
Speaker 1: of a religion and it's not gonna fulfill man. So
Speaker 1: they kind of anticipate that science and scientism and Darwinism
Speaker 1: and it's nihilistic. So again, we're gonna have to have
Speaker 1: a new paradigm. And in fact, they actually talk about paradigms.
Speaker 1: They talk about Kurt Girdell and Thomas kOhm structures of
Speaker 1: scientific Revolution. So this is a pretty high level philosophical
Speaker 1: and academic intellectual text. I didn't expect all that to
Speaker 1: come up. They don't explicitly mention presuppositionalism, but they're kind
Speaker 1: of talking about that when they talk about Tarski, they
Speaker 1: talk about Michael Polani and they talk about how scientism
Speaker 1: is not understanding that science itself is based on ideas
Speaker 1: that cannot be justified by science. They actually make this
Speaker 1: argument I couldn't believe this on pages like sixty nine
Speaker 1: to seventy one, and they actually point out stuff I've
Speaker 1: argued that Girdell and even people like Tarski have shown
Speaker 1: that systems studies and systems science has its limitations. You
Speaker 1: can't prove a system or an entire paradigm from within
Speaker 1: the paradigm from within the system. So since science and
Speaker 1: scientism is limited, we're going to need a new paradigm.
Speaker 1: The new paradigm can't be the deterministic mechanistic scientism of
Speaker 1: Darwinism and a causal chain, you know, deistic clockmaker universe, right,
Speaker 1: the new physics of quantum physics, which was very popular
Speaker 1: at this time. And there's also there was all these
Speaker 1: boomer books that were coming out at this time, like
Speaker 1: The Dance Seeing Wu Lee Masters, right, this kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: Bloombers were eating this stuff up in nineteen seventy nine,
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty, right at the exact same time as Who's
Speaker 1: the Quantum Physics Orvin Laslow is beginning to push quantum
Speaker 1: physic quantum, quantum quantum everywhere it's like a big siop
Speaker 1: to push all this stuff, right, dude, Like modern physics
Speaker 1: is like ancient ancient mystics. Bro, it's like ancient Taoism.
Speaker 1: It's the same, dude, WHOA. This was being pushed as
Speaker 1: the new ethos of the new science of quantum science
Speaker 1: to give people a new paradigm, a new worldview. Determinism
Speaker 1: is old Darwinian, it's Newtonian. The new physics that replaces
Speaker 1: Newtonianism as quantum bro. So we're gonna be quantum bros.
Speaker 1: And we're no longer going to be reductionists and stuck
Speaker 1: in some reductionist framework. So this is the first seventy Actually,
Speaker 1: by the way, the book is only two under pages.
Speaker 1: I thought this was a longer text us until I
Speaker 1: started getting into It's only two under pages. So we
Speaker 1: are almost halfway. And next we're going to move into
Speaker 1: we talked about economic Man, we talked about religious Western Man,
Speaker 1: and we talked about science man, Western scientism Man. And
Speaker 1: next we're going to move into transformed Man in part two.
Speaker 1: So I hope you enjoyed the first half of Changing
Speaker 1: Images of Man, or at least the first third, or
Speaker 1: about the first or about seventy five pages in. At
Speaker 1: this point it's only two hundred page books. So Part
Speaker 1: two will be four members and we will go much
Speaker 1: deeper into the actual processes of how they plan to
Speaker 1: transform us. Thank you guys again for those super chats.
Speaker 1: I want to mind if we have a show sponsor,
Speaker 1: which is chalk dot com, that is c choq dot com.
Speaker 1: If you're interested, also you can go into the archives
Speaker 1: and watch the talk that we did on Arthur Kessler's
Speaker 1: Goes to the Machine Acquiring Conspiracy by Marilyn ferguson H. G.
Speaker 1: Wells's book, Well both of his books that we've covered
Speaker 1: up in Conspiracy New Rule Order. They both cover this
Speaker 1: topic and freedof Coppras Turning Point, all of which are
Speaker 1: globally text pointing to this. Chalk dot com is the
Speaker 1: best of supplementation on the internet. Use the promo code
Speaker 1: jay for is already get forty percent off or J
Speaker 1: forty four lives. That's Jay four four l I f
Speaker 1: e to get forty four percent off, and don't let
Speaker 1: them turn you into a Skittles new age bro.
Speaker 8: Just like there's no male dominance here. It's just like
Speaker 8: festivals of communal intentional living and we're speaking our truths
Speaker 8: of power.
Speaker 1: Use that promo code Jay four four Life J forty
Speaker 1: four Life to get forty four percent off all of
Speaker 1: those great products that we're talking including the Foreman Stack,
Speaker 1: with the Chad Mode, with the Action two point zero
Speaker 1: and the proven testosterone boosting Tonkat one hundred. In other words,
Speaker 1: this will help you not become one of those festival bros.
Speaker 1: You won't be at gay camp when you're taking Chad Mode.
Speaker 1: My friend. Now, we did get a huge super chat.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much to our buddy over here. Where
Speaker 1: was it at? He's over here paying for the mic? Basically,
Speaker 1: Caleb says, for ten dollars, keep up the good work.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Caleb Benson says, what do you think about
Speaker 1: King Charles's soft spot for Orthodoxy? I don't make much
Speaker 1: of it. He's a perennialist, so he likes all the religions.
Speaker 1: What about the Church of England and decline? Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 1: It's done for a non sens For five dollars for Spooktober,
Speaker 1: I recommend criminologists gave Morale. She should contact him. He
Speaker 1: talks about Colts and SRA. He's familiar with the manson
Speaker 1: stuff as well, and here is his channel. Okay, I'll
Speaker 1: check it out. Dan Schroeder twenty dollars. He's the guy
Speaker 1: that said great content on Lord Waldemart. Bobby d ten dollars.
Speaker 1: Here's towards the new microphone. Thank you. Yes, this will
Speaker 1: all go towards a brand new mic so that we
Speaker 1: won't have these issues. Gary, one hundred and fifty dollars.
Speaker 1: Gary went super Child's for the day. One hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty bucks from Gary. Thank you so much, Gary. He says,
Speaker 1: very grateful for your work. Well, Gary, I'm very grateful
Speaker 1: for you, and you are the biggest contributor to the
Speaker 1: new microphone. No. One five dollars. There's a funny video
Speaker 1: of a Baptist pastor saying that the Book of Mormon
Speaker 1: is a Baptist book. It is hilarious, Okay, is he joking?
Speaker 1: I mean I want to be charitable and nuanced and
Speaker 1: hope that my brother is joking because that sounds so ridiculous.
Speaker 1: Eato token five dollars. Here's the new Booty mic got
Speaker 1: a new Booty microphone.
Speaker 6: Microphone.
Speaker 1: We'll see. I'll make sure I didn't miss one ze five dollars.
Speaker 1: Here's donating for cool sounds. Hope you have a nice
Speaker 1: microphone day aside from audios. Yeah, well it's gonna go
Speaker 1: directly towards getting a new mic toothless granny ten dollars.
Speaker 1: Speaking of megaliths, check out the Barrabus Caves, India documentary. Fascinating.
Speaker 1: All these megaliths are built with stones and the copper
Speaker 1: tools by guys wearing one cloth. Doesn't make sense. Give
Speaker 1: me a break. These findings blow away mainstream archaeology out
Speaker 1: of the water. The Bara Boss Caves in India. Well
Speaker 1: that's a new one I don't know about. Let's see
Speaker 1: Borrow Boss Caves. We need to do a megalith stream. No,
Speaker 1: he's not joking. It's on YouTube. Uh well, what do
Speaker 1: I type in? Tell me what the type in and
Speaker 1: I'll pull it up. The impossible precision of the Bar
Speaker 1: of Boston.
Speaker 2: This is it.
Speaker 1: Okay, Well, I'll have to watch this. This looks like
Speaker 1: a fun documentary. We'll do us a Megaliths an Ancient
Speaker 1: Civilizations stream very soon. We did one of these, by
Speaker 1: the way, with Actually we did one on my channel
Speaker 1: too long ago, and then we did a similar stream
Speaker 1: about the Giza Pyramids with our buddy Jake Rattlesnake. If
Speaker 1: you guys miss that, you can find me and Jake
Speaker 1: Rattlesnake doing a Megalith's stream. And what do I need
Speaker 1: to type in Baptist? Where does a Baptist preacher talk
Speaker 1: about the Mormon book Mormon being Baptist?
Speaker 2: That's so stupid.
Speaker 1: I mean, we're just at the point where people are
Speaker 1: just straight up, they're not becoming retorted. They're diving headlong
Speaker 1: into a giant vat of retarded juice and like growing
Speaker 1: gills to breathe the retarded juice. That's where we're at.
Speaker 1: I remember how over to chalk dot com, guys. I
Speaker 1: will look up the Baptist Mormon man very soon. Thank
Speaker 1: you guys so much, and thank you for donating. If
Speaker 1: you'd like to remember, you can superchat at any time
Speaker 1: and I'll read it on the next dream. So, if
Speaker 1: you're watching this later today or tonight and you'd like
Speaker 1: to support send a super chat, donate to the New
Speaker 1: Microphone Fund and we'll get it popping off. Excuse me,
Speaker 1: we'll get it not popping off as we get it
Speaker 1: popping off