Speaker 1: Put an end to these migrant riots. Order will be restored,
Speaker 1: the President, writing, the illegals will be expelled and Los
Speaker 1: Angeles will be set free. Thank you for your attention
Speaker 1: to this matter. So obviously some provocation here from the
Speaker 1: President in several facets. As we see here we go,
Speaker 1: those demonstrators are making their way down the ramp and
Speaker 1: onto the one oh one freeway. This is, I think
Speaker 1: a concern that we had seen a little earlier. The
Speaker 1: freeway had been shut down by law enforcement, and it
Speaker 1: is now being shut down by the other side. Demonstrators
Speaker 1: are on the surface of the southbound one oh one
Speaker 1: freeway and blocking traffic.
Speaker 2: Riot season is upon us, and it came early this year.
Speaker 2: Isn't it amazing how we had all through the Biden
Speaker 2: administration twenty one, twenty two, twenty three, twenty four, almost
Speaker 2: no rioting and that was notable, that's for sure. Twenty
Speaker 2: twenty widespread nationwide, full on a blaze. Twenty twenty five,
Speaker 2: they're back, and that odd and that's strange. What a
Speaker 2: weird coincidence, isn't it? Welcome to liberty lockdown. This is
Speaker 2: Clinton Russell. For those that aren't familiar with me or
Speaker 2: my backstory. I am a California native former I should
Speaker 2: say born and raised though thirty five plus years in California.
Speaker 2: Absolutely loved it until it was utterly destroyed by Gavin Newsom.
Speaker 2: So this story is personal to me. I am not
Speaker 2: going to pretend to be unbiased. I am extraordinarily biased
Speaker 2: about the circumstances that have led to this, the situation
Speaker 2: that exists today, and what ought to be done about it.
Speaker 2: I am going to lose a lot of supporters over
Speaker 2: what I have to say in the next twenty minutes
Speaker 2: or whatever this episode ends up being. I am radicalized
Speaker 2: on this issue, and I'm going to give you the backstory.
Speaker 2: I'm going to tell you why you don't have to
Speaker 2: agree with me, and I hope that for once we
Speaker 2: could actually maybe dis agree and still be friends at
Speaker 2: the end of it. But if not, that's fine too,
Speaker 2: because I'm going to tell you the truth. I'm gonna
Speaker 2: tell you what I saw with my own eyes, and
Speaker 2: I'm gonna tell you how I feel about it, and
Speaker 2: I'm gonna tell you what I think we ought to
Speaker 2: be doing moving forward, and you can decide to agree
Speaker 2: or disagree. That's fine. It's America, after all. Before I
Speaker 2: give you my story, let's see some of the chaos
Speaker 2: that is ensuing. This is all effective as of last night,
Speaker 2: to give you an idea of what's happening. So first up,
Speaker 2: you can see that we've got some I think that's
Speaker 2: LAPD I'm not sure, but they are pinned down underneath
Speaker 2: the overpass again. I think that's the one.
Speaker 3: Ten.
Speaker 2: It's not looking pretty. Last night, Donald Trump issued an
Speaker 2: order to send in the National Guard, and then there
Speaker 2: was additional conversations about whether or not they were going
Speaker 2: to send in Marines from Camp Pendleton. I lived in
Speaker 2: Carl's bed, so I know this area well. It's about
Speaker 2: a two hour drive away from Camp Pendleton to Los Angeles.
Speaker 2: So if he does, in fact decide to deploy the Marines,
Speaker 2: they will be there fast. Almost gives you a deja
Speaker 2: vu of Portland back in twenty twenty, doesn't it? The
Speaker 2: autonomy his own? Once again, you have anti ice protesters
Speaker 2: that are setting up barricades on the streets and hunkering down,
Speaker 2: preparing for a fight of some magnitude. It's amazing to
Speaker 2: witness and it's not at all surprising, but it is disappointing.
Speaker 2: For so many years of mismanagement from Karen bass Is,
Speaker 2: the mayor of La Gavin Newsmith, the governor. There isn't
Speaker 2: a catastrophe that hasn't happened over the past few years
Speaker 2: that they haven't found some weird roundabout way to blame
Speaker 2: on Donald Trump, even when he was the president of
Speaker 2: the United States. Fires in the Palisades and things like that.
Speaker 2: Every single failing of their management has been laid at
Speaker 2: the feet of Donald Trump somehow. And let me tell you,
Speaker 2: as someone who lived there, it is not a consequence
Speaker 2: of Donald Trump. It is not a consequence of Donald
Speaker 2: Trump's rhetoric or his behavior or anything like that. Now
Speaker 2: you can argue this one is because he's in fact
Speaker 2: the one that's ordering these ice raids to go after
Speaker 2: illegal immigrants. Allegedly, Tom Holman says they're going after the criminals,
Speaker 2: like violent ones. I don't know if that's accurate or
Speaker 2: if they're doing widespread mass deportation at this junction, but regardless,
Speaker 2: it's still a consequence of the policies of the governor
Speaker 2: of California, because all of these sanctuary cities throughout California
Speaker 2: have created an environment in which illegal immigration has skyrocketed
Speaker 2: for years and years, and then Joe Biden left the
Speaker 2: border open for four years and guess what, a lot
Speaker 2: of people came in. So now, because of the way
Speaker 2: the portionment system works when it comes to congressional representation,
Speaker 2: even if you're not a citizen in even if you're
Speaker 2: not allowed to vote, if you are there in the state,
Speaker 2: you are counted for congressional seat apportionment, which means that
Speaker 2: if you allow for millions of legals to come into
Speaker 2: the state of California or Texas or whatever border state
Speaker 2: they go into, that means that you get more congressional seats,
Speaker 2: and oftentimes that are in fact, mathematically it has to
Speaker 2: subtract from some other states because you're still going to
Speaker 2: have a cap of four hundred and thirty five in
Speaker 2: the House. So that's how it works, and this has
Speaker 2: been the game plan for the longest time. This is
Speaker 2: the Democrats game plan to essentially monopolize the system of
Speaker 2: government that we live under. This is ultimately what started
Speaker 2: to shift my mentality when it came to immigration and
Speaker 2: the border system. This is not about humanitarianism. If you
Speaker 2: think for a second that Gavin Newsom cares about Juanita,
Speaker 2: you're out of your fucking mind. This guy he could
Speaker 2: not care less, doesn't care even slightly about Jose or whatever.
Speaker 2: This is purely a political power play, a maneuver, a
Speaker 2: circumvention of the system in order to add to their power,
Speaker 2: into monopolized power by which they could essentially abuse the
Speaker 2: people that are from America. That's what they've been doing
Speaker 2: for a very long time. Now, I'm going to give
Speaker 2: you more backdrop as to why I change my opinion
Speaker 2: on this issue. We'll get to that in a second.
Speaker 2: Let's check out some more.
Speaker 4: Footage to CNN's Chiong Law, who has been standing by.
Speaker 5: All day, Kyung.
Speaker 4: A lot has happened since we've been talking to you.
Speaker 5: Where are you now?
Speaker 2: What is the status where you are?
Speaker 5: There are multiple protests now, or at least we should
Speaker 5: call them incursions between the people who've been demonstrating here,
Speaker 5: people who've joined in, and law enforcement.
Speaker 4: We are near where all of this began, and what
Speaker 4: you're seeing here is a mix of predominantly federal agents
Speaker 4: Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Patrol, as well
Speaker 4: as the National Guard that brought out some of these protesters.
Speaker 5: But you can see.
Speaker 6: They've created quite some space between them and these protesters
Speaker 6: that violence that you were referring to, Jess. You can
Speaker 6: see that there's a car burning in the background, and
Speaker 6: while they've made a semi circle here on the street,
Speaker 6: you can see that the Weimo over there has been vandalized,
Speaker 6: and we understand that some cars over there may also
Speaker 6: be waymos that have is set on fire. So this
Speaker 6: is a part of the night that law enforcement really
Speaker 6: worries about because when I look at some of these protesters,
Speaker 6: they are not resembling the people who were here when
Speaker 6: all of this began earlier this morning in Los Angeles.
Speaker 6: This crowd is different, and so now you have a
Speaker 6: problem for law enforcement trying to contain these people, whoever
Speaker 6: they may be.
Speaker 2: Isn't it odd how the news journal doesn't want to
Speaker 2: tell you, well, the people are different, the protesters from
Speaker 2: this morning and the ones that are there tonight, they
Speaker 2: seem a little bit differ. How are they different? Could
Speaker 2: you elucidate for us newsperson whose job it is to
Speaker 2: report what's going on the ground so that the people
Speaker 2: could actually understand what's happening. She doesn't give us any
Speaker 2: details in that funny? Is that amazing? What's the implication
Speaker 2: The implication is that these are much more dangerous protesters,
Speaker 2: perhaps ones that are not so much interested in keeping
Speaker 2: deportations from happening, but rather I don't know, let's take
Speaker 2: a look at this. Just your standard Soviet flag wearing
Speaker 2: spectator as cops are pinned down underneath an overpass. Who
Speaker 2: doesn't wear a mask and adorn themselves with a Soviet flag?
Speaker 2: Oh my goodness. Yeah. So whether or not these people
Speaker 2: are paid agitators, I can't say definitively. Obviously, I don't
Speaker 2: know for sure. I'd be surprised if some of them are.
Speaker 2: There has been reports that Natifa has put out the
Speaker 2: siren called ticket there people activated out on the streets.
Speaker 2: So I expect this to get really out of hand
Speaker 2: overnight and potentially go crazy over this next week. I
Speaker 2: hope not, but I'll give you my prescription as to
Speaker 2: how to remedy it. And let me tell you, libertarians
Speaker 2: aren't going to like it. And in case you were
Speaker 2: wondering if that journal what was wrong about the Waymo
Speaker 2: cars being on fire, here you go. So, yes, our
Speaker 2: technocratic dystopia is having a bit of a setback. The
Speaker 2: self driving Waymo cars, which cost over two hundred thousand
Speaker 2: dollars apiece are a set of blaze. So what's happening
Speaker 2: is that people are You have to assume people are
Speaker 2: ordering way moos to come pick them up, and then
Speaker 2: they're lighting them on fire. Quite an interesting way of protesting.
Speaker 2: Let's hear what Gavin Newsom has to say about this kerfuffle.
Speaker 3: Put your hands off. These poor people are just trying
Speaker 3: to live their lives. Man, trying to live their lives
Speaker 3: paying their tax has been here ten years. The fear,
Speaker 3: the horror, the hell is this guy? Come after me?
Speaker 3: Arrest me. Let's just get it over with. Tough guy.
Speaker 3: I don't give a damn, but I care about my community.
Speaker 3: I care about this community. The hell are they doing.
Speaker 3: These guys need to grow up, they need to stop,
Speaker 3: and we need to push back. I'm sorry to be
Speaker 3: so clear, but that kind of blow eating is exhausting.
Speaker 3: So tom, arrest me, let's go.
Speaker 2: This guy is like a daytime soap opera actor that's
Speaker 2: somehow became like the highest level of hope of the
Speaker 2: Democratic Party to reclaim the White House. It's so transparent.
Speaker 2: What's happening here? I hope we are all on the
Speaker 2: same page, but I'll give you my opinion in case
Speaker 2: you're wondering. He's running for president in twenty twenty eight.
Speaker 2: I know what a shocker, right, but the performative nature
Speaker 2: of his protests arrest me. Tom Holman, I'm standing in
Speaker 2: between these poor people that I didn't give a shit
Speaker 2: about ever, that I locked in their houses for years
Speaker 2: as a consequence of a pathogen that wasn't even transferable
Speaker 2: through the air, that actually vitamin D was one of
Speaker 2: the best remedies that if you actually were in the sun,
Speaker 2: it was actually going to keep you alive. And I said,
Speaker 2: stay in your fucking house. And by the way, did
Speaker 2: I leave the liquor stores open? Yes? I did? Did
Speaker 2: I close down the gyms also? Yes? Yeah I care.
Speaker 2: I'm standing in between you, Donald Trump and Tom Holman
Speaker 2: and these poor landscapers. It's just such fucking bullshit. If
Speaker 2: anyone buys this guy's stick, you are so fucking low.
Speaker 2: IQ should not be allowed to vote. And don't get
Speaker 2: it twisted. It ain't just limited to La here is
Speaker 2: just outside the ICE headquarters in San Francisco, as I
Speaker 2: said earlier. According to Andy No, Antifa International has issued
Speaker 2: a call to action to hit the streets. This is
Speaker 2: gonna get crazy, and I'm gonna do my best to
Speaker 2: implore libertarians to think this through on a multitude of levels.
Speaker 2: And I don't expect you guys to agree with me,
Speaker 2: So just calm down, okay, But do you want to
Speaker 2: side with Antifa and the communists on this? Do you
Speaker 2: think that they may have motivations that aren't the same
Speaker 2: as you. Is there a chance that they're motivated by
Speaker 2: something else, given that the vast majority of them are
Speaker 2: overt communists. I hope you are thinking this through deeply.
Speaker 2: I really mean that once you understand, particularly the NGO network.
Speaker 2: So let me give the whole backdrop as to how
Speaker 2: I changed my mind on the immigration issue. First off,
Speaker 2: I was raised in California. I watched as my state
Speaker 2: changed dramatically and degraded as a consequence of that. Now,
Speaker 2: I didn't correlate that with immigration. I didn't think of
Speaker 2: it that way at all. Honestly, I thought of it
Speaker 2: primarily as a consequence of taxes and regulation, and I
Speaker 2: still believe that played a huge role obviously. However, I
Speaker 2: then started to recognize, based off of congressional apportionment, that
Speaker 2: there was actually an incentive to allow for this to
Speaker 2: continue and to grow exponentially. And then I realized that
Speaker 2: there was a trend amongst democratic states to have sanctuary
Speaker 2: cities by which they could get more congressional representation. Then
Speaker 2: I dug a little bit deeper. Then I realized that
Speaker 2: there was actually plans through the United Nations back in
Speaker 2: the mid two thousands where they talked about how they
Speaker 2: were going to essentially provide reparations to the Third World
Speaker 2: by allowing for I legal immigration into the first World.
Speaker 2: And by first world, what they really mean was the West.
Speaker 2: And if you've looked at Europe lately, you already see
Speaker 2: what that looks like. It has not been great. Now.
Speaker 2: There are a lot of conflating factors here. This is
Speaker 2: not a simple story, and I think that's the biggest
Speaker 2: problem with trying to analyze this in a simplistic fashion
Speaker 2: and a purely principled answer. People are free to travel
Speaker 2: where they want. That's a libertarian one oh one answer.
Speaker 2: There's a lot of conflating factors. So I want you
Speaker 2: to just consider all of this and then decide for yourself.
Speaker 2: Then you add on top of the United Nations, the
Speaker 2: World Economic Forums plans they talk about replacement migration, where
Speaker 2: as depopulation starts to happen because there isn't enough reproduction
Speaker 2: in certain countries, it can be supplemented by immigration to
Speaker 2: offset the loss of revenue from the lack of reproduction
Speaker 2: of the domestic population. They argue, because of the nature
Speaker 2: of the social safety net, not just welfare programs, but
Speaker 2: social security, all of the entire entitlement basket you have
Speaker 2: to have because they're all Ponzi schemes. You have to
Speaker 2: have more people paying in than are receiving. If the
Speaker 2: baby boomer population doesn't reproduce, and if their offspring doesn't
Speaker 2: reproduce to a level that's as much or higher, then
Speaker 2: the ponzi scheme goes bust, now, doesn't it. And believe
Speaker 2: it or not, that was the more benign explanation that
Speaker 2: they just wanted to maintain the house of cards that
Speaker 2: is our social safety net. And if that was the
Speaker 2: only justification, I guess it wouldn't be that bad. But
Speaker 2: that is not the only justification. What they realized very
Speaker 2: rapidly is that those that are immigrating from the third world,
Speaker 2: in particular, we're not talking about people that are immigrating
Speaker 2: from Canada into America or from France or the UK
Speaker 2: into America. But people that are migrating from Latin America
Speaker 2: the poorer areas, or from Africa or from the Middle East,
Speaker 2: they come across and their destitute, they're extremely poor. Therefore
Speaker 2: they need help right away. Who are the people that
Speaker 2: need help going to vote for? Historically, based off the
Speaker 2: domestic population, they're going to vote for the Democrats because
Speaker 2: those are the people that are offering the most handouts.
Speaker 2: The Republicans, at least in terms of rhetoric, are offering
Speaker 2: not that, even though they oftentimes give them that too.
Speaker 2: So that was the thought process. Now the endgame is
Speaker 2: to get as many people in as possible that aren't
Speaker 2: American and then offer them citizenship by which they are
Speaker 2: then dutifully supposed to support and vote for Democrats for
Speaker 2: the rest of their life because they were allowed in
Speaker 2: under Democrat policy and they were offered the most handouts
Speaker 2: by the Democrats, so why wouldn't they Then they were
Speaker 2: offered citizenship by the Democrats, so of course they're going
Speaker 2: to be dutiful foot soldiers for the Democratic regime. That's
Speaker 2: the thought process. But it gets way darker than that,
Speaker 2: and this is what I think libertarians ought to be
Speaker 2: most upset about. This is where it gets super sinister,
Speaker 2: the NGO networks. Once I realized that the United Nations
Speaker 2: had these plans, I then thought, is this actually happening?
Speaker 2: Is it actually being funded? The answer is yes, through
Speaker 2: the United Nations and through the NGO networks, tens and
Speaker 2: tens of billions of dollars billions with a B that's
Speaker 2: how much money your tax dollars are being used to
Speaker 2: assist in the illegal immigration into your country, not the
Speaker 2: legal immigration. So you are being robbed As a libertarian.
Speaker 2: That should upset you. To fund people to come into
Speaker 2: your country, to then outnumber you and to vote against
Speaker 2: your interests, and to ultimately erode your liberty for the
Speaker 2: rest of your existence as well as undermine the fiscal
Speaker 2: solvency of your nation. That is the game plan. Now,
Speaker 2: if you haven't heard of the Cloward Pivens strategy, this
Speaker 2: is that you create a paradigm by which the system
Speaker 2: is overwhelmed. That's what they've been doing for decades. When
Speaker 2: did they start calling Donald Trump a fascist? Checked it
Speaker 2: was day one. It was immediately before he was even
Speaker 2: in power. And why did they do that? If you
Speaker 2: look at the circumstances that they created. It basically forces
Speaker 2: any Republican that comes into power, if he intends to
Speaker 2: remedy it, to use state power to do so. If
Speaker 2: he does that, then they get to say, told you fascist.
Speaker 2: So this is the tails you lose, heads I win scenario.
Speaker 2: They're trying to paint him into a corner, and more
Speaker 2: than that, paint all of us, the Americans, the domestic
Speaker 2: population into a corner too.
Speaker 7: We saw the first night was bad, but we've seen
Speaker 7: subsequent to that is getting increasingly worse and more violent. Tonight,
Speaker 7: we had individuals out there shooting commercial grade fireworks at
Speaker 7: our officers that can kill you. And we have adapted
Speaker 7: our tactics to be able to have a chance, to
Speaker 7: be able to take these people into custody and to
Speaker 7: be able to hold them accountable. We are overwhelmed as
Speaker 7: far as the number of people out there engaged in
Speaker 7: this type of vector and the type of things that
Speaker 7: they're doing. They'll take backpack, and the backpack will have
Speaker 7: a cinder block, and if they have a hammer, and
Speaker 7: they'll break up the cinder block and use that pass
Speaker 7: it around to throw at officers, to throw at cars
Speaker 7: and throw.
Speaker 2: At other people.
Speaker 7: We've seen people with hammers, and you've broadcasted breaking the
Speaker 7: ballards behind the Federal Building and taken the rocks, if
Speaker 7: you will, or pieces of concrete and throwing them at officers.
Speaker 7: We've had liquid of who knows what the description, thrown
Speaker 7: at officers. There's no limit to what they're doing to
Speaker 7: our officers. And again, as I mentioned in my statement,
Speaker 7: I can't thank our folks enough in our partner agency
Speaker 7: police officials for going out there and taking care of
Speaker 7: the community. So what has happened in California since twenty
Speaker 7: twenty thanks to the defund the police movements? A lot
Speaker 7: of the police forces have been defunded and they are undermanned.
Speaker 2: Now. Something that you should understand about California. Obviously, it's
Speaker 2: the most populated state. What I think a lot of
Speaker 2: people don't know is that it also, obviously this is logical,
Speaker 2: it has the most legal immigrants. The old estimates was
Speaker 2: that there's somewhere around three million illegal immigrants that live there.
Speaker 2: I think it'd be crazy to think that there's not
Speaker 2: at least ten percent of the forty million, which would
Speaker 2: put it at four million. I think it's far higher
Speaker 2: than that by some estimates, there's four million legal immigrants
Speaker 2: just in LA County alone. It's a very large state,
Speaker 2: and well LA County is huge, there's a lot more
Speaker 2: than that. A lot of people think there's more than
Speaker 2: ten million there. I don't know. Some people say twenty.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to guess at the amount. The point
Speaker 2: that I'm trying to get to is that we're talking
Speaker 2: about an astronomical amount of people. Astronomical. Now, as I said,
Speaker 2: I don't know if Donald Trump intends to deport all
Speaker 2: of them. I doubt it. I don't even think it's possible.
Speaker 2: But even if you say that the ten million estimate
Speaker 2: is right, and then you just take one percent of that,
Speaker 2: if one percent of the ten million is in fact
Speaker 2: criminal like violent elements, that would mean you have one
Speaker 2: hundred thousand people that you have to try and root
Speaker 2: out of a state of forty million, and then deport
Speaker 2: all of those people. Well, the domestic population, many of
Speaker 2: which are also illegal immigrants, but perhaps not the violent type,
Speaker 2: are out on the streets protesting you in mass How
Speaker 2: do you do that? The answer is you're not gonna. Okay,
Speaker 2: it's not gonna happen. It's not gonna happen with ICE agents.
Speaker 2: It's not gonna happen with local PD. You're gonna have
Speaker 2: to bring in the fucking military. Now. I am not
Speaker 2: prepared to call for that because I think once you
Speaker 2: bring in the military onto domestic soil or in very
Speaker 2: dark territory. And just to be clear, despite the fact
Speaker 2: that I don't support it, there are a ton of
Speaker 2: Republican voters, maybe the majority, I'm not sure, but it's
Speaker 2: a lot of Trump supporters, Trump voters Maga that want
Speaker 2: to see that. And there's a real chance that it happens.
Speaker 2: As you're watching this like it's close, if it gets
Speaker 2: really violent over the next day or two, I would
Speaker 2: not be surprised at all if it goes from four
Speaker 2: hundred marines to thousands of military troops on the ground
Speaker 2: in California. And once you're at that point, especially when
Speaker 2: you have a governor that's going against it, especially once
Speaker 2: you have the mayor of la which is going against it,
Speaker 2: I'm sure the mayor of San Francisco will go against it.
Speaker 2: It's a real conflict that has a chance to boil
Speaker 2: over into a serious crisis. I don't know if that's
Speaker 2: where we're headed. But there's a distinct possibility that we are.
Speaker 2: While I think that may very well be a violation
Speaker 2: of the Passe Comatati sect, which is a US federal
Speaker 2: law that restricts the use of federal military personnel for
Speaker 2: domestic law enforcement. But here's the caveat unless specifically authorized
Speaker 2: by the Constitution or Congress, which means there is a
Speaker 2: chance that, in fact, because the Constitution does give border
Speaker 2: control to the FEDS, that means that perhaps they do
Speaker 2: have the right to use the on domestic soil. So
Speaker 2: I think that there's a real argument that the Supreme
Speaker 2: Court would hold that up, in which case we could
Speaker 2: see major military action on domestic soil in cal And.
Speaker 2: As Elon said, this is not okay. Look, I am
Speaker 2: not the type to lean into hard nationalism to uphold
Speaker 2: the flag. I remember when I was in high school,
Speaker 2: I thought it was such an absurdity that I had
Speaker 2: to stand up for the Pledge of allegiance. And I thought,
Speaker 2: because I was a libertarian from even back then, and
Speaker 2: I know that's crazy, I was weird. But anyways, I
Speaker 2: refused and I got I think I got detention or
Speaker 2: something for it, but I just didn't like it. I've
Speaker 2: always been very critical of groupthink and any sort of
Speaker 2: fealty towards the state, and I still feel that way
Speaker 2: to a large extent. But I'll tell you this, I
Speaker 2: don't like seeing people stand on top of burnout cars
Speaker 2: waving a Mexican flag in my country. Yeah, I said it,
Speaker 2: my country, it is, it's mine, Okay, I'm gonna say it.
Speaker 2: I don't care. I was born here. I have a
Speaker 2: better claim to it than anybody else in the rest
Speaker 2: of the world. I'm standing on that, and when I
Speaker 2: see some with a foreign flag standing on top of
Speaker 2: burnt out cars in my country, it does not feel
Speaker 2: like assimilation to me. It feels like conquest. And I
Speaker 2: don't know how anybody looks at that and doesn't feel similarly.
Speaker 2: Today's episode of Liberty Lockdown with Clint Russell is brought
Speaker 2: to you by our friends over at crowd Health. If
Speaker 2: you've had to deal with health insurance, you already know
Speaker 2: it sucks. I can't tell you how many hours I've
Speaker 2: spent on the phone trying to get stuff covered, and
Speaker 2: it's just a nightmare. Health insurance processes are confusing and
Speaker 2: can leave you feeling taken advantage of and that's exactly
Speaker 2: why crowdhealth was created. For one hundred and seventy five
Speaker 2: dollars for an individual or five hundred and seventy five
Speaker 2: dollars for a family of four or more, you'll get
Speaker 2: access to a community of people who are willing to
Speaker 2: help out in the event of an emergency. You'll get
Speaker 2: access to telemedicine visits, discount of prescriptions, and so much
Speaker 2: more without doctor's networks getting in the way. And of course,
Speaker 2: you'll join the crowd, a group of members just like
Speaker 2: you who want to help pay for each other's unexpected
Speaker 2: medical events. Let crowd health help with your health care needs.
Speaker 2: Get started today for just nine nine dollars per month
Speaker 2: for your first three months by using code lockdown at
Speaker 2: join crowdhealth dot com. Crowdhealth is not insurance. Learn more
Speaker 2: at join crowdhealth dot com. That's join crowdhealth dot com
Speaker 2: code lockdown. Folks like that are not here to get along.
Speaker 2: They're not here to become an American. They are here
Speaker 2: to replace the domestic population with their own set of
Speaker 2: cultural beliefs and values, whatever they may be.
Speaker 1: And this is not just a good shoesture. It is
Speaker 1: something we need to make real we need to break down.
Speaker 4: This health what.
Speaker 2: To now. Some of you aren't from California, and some
Speaker 2: of you aren't old like me, so you won't be
Speaker 2: familiar with this. But that chant that they're doing, I
Speaker 2: think it's make it green like ninety two. Ninety two
Speaker 2: was the La riots. That's when the worst riots in
Speaker 2: my lifetime, I think, probably in California's history. They were insane.
Speaker 2: After the Rodney King beating by LAPD, the streets were
Speaker 2: a blaze for weeks.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 2: I was a kid, but it felt like forever. And
Speaker 2: they are chanting the same thing, and they're saying make
Speaker 2: it like nineteen ninety two, and they have their fists up.
Speaker 2: I don't know. It looks a lot like either black
Speaker 2: Panther or slash communists. To me, I'm leaning towards communists
Speaker 2: on this one. Not sure. Doesn't really change the fact
Speaker 2: that they are lighting the flag of my country on fire,
Speaker 2: spitting on it, and they have a banner up that
Speaker 2: says resist on it, which once again goes into the
Speaker 2: kind of Antifa slash Marxist rhetoric. I'll make it very blunt.
Speaker 2: These people don't reflect my values. Now, I don't think
Speaker 2: it's necessary good to honor all laws. Unjust laws you
Speaker 2: should violate. There are laws that are just, and therefore
Speaker 2: you should not violate them, like murder, for instance. These
Speaker 2: people are overtly and boldly violating the laws of this
Speaker 2: country and some of the laws that I think matter,
Speaker 2: like who is a citizen, who is allowed to be here?
Speaker 2: And this is not a minor incursion or talking tens
Speaker 2: and tens of millions by some estimates, thirty million plus
Speaker 2: by some estimates. It's fifty million or higher of illegal
Speaker 2: immigrants throughout the entire country, not just California. Now, will
Speaker 2: all of them vote for the Democrats?
Speaker 3: No.
Speaker 2: According to a Pew Research study from twenty thirteen, fifty
Speaker 2: four percent of immigrants said that they identify as a Democrat.
Speaker 2: So you're thinking, oh, that means forty seven percent I
Speaker 2: identify as Republicans. Wrong. Thirteen percent of first generation immigrants
Speaker 2: in this country, and these are legal immigrants, identify as Republican.
Speaker 2: That means that a huge percentage of those that come
Speaker 2: here legally will ultimately vote Democrat. These are first generation. Now,
Speaker 2: as the generations go on, certainly they'll acclimate more to
Speaker 2: the American way, and many of them will then embrace
Speaker 2: gun rights and privacy rights and things of that nature,
Speaker 2: and they may lean more libertarian or Republican, But the
Speaker 2: first generation, the mass majority, will vote Democrat dutifully. The
Speaker 2: illegal immigrants, do you think that they're going to be
Speaker 2: higher or lower than that? My guess is even higher.
Speaker 2: And no matter how you feel about the pledge of allegiance,
Speaker 2: if you're the type of person that lights the American
Speaker 2: flag on fire while you're here illegally, spits on it,
Speaker 2: and then chance, do you think that they're the type
Speaker 2: that really love the Constitution, Because it strikes me that, well, yes,
Speaker 2: I fully support anybody who wants to protest, and I
Speaker 2: absolutely support burning the flag if you want to. I
Speaker 2: wouldn't do it myself, and I would probably recommend against it.
Speaker 2: But if you're here illegally and you are burning the
Speaker 2: American flag in a country that you are not here legally,
Speaker 2: that tells me that you are here to take over,
Speaker 2: and based off the voting trends, I know exactly how
Speaker 2: you will. And unfortunately, the Democrat Party has become such
Speaker 2: an existential threat to my liberty that if you intend
Speaker 2: to vote in such a huge percentage in favor of
Speaker 2: the Democrats. Then I have to perceive that as a
Speaker 2: maneuver by which you have full spectrum dominance when it
Speaker 2: comes to electoral victories, and that is the goal. Don't
Speaker 2: get it twisted. So what's the answer, I'll tell you.
Speaker 2: After the Summer of Love, the twenty twenty riots, which
Speaker 2: extended for months, I think you have to crack down hard.
Speaker 2: And I say this with major hesitancy because I don't
Speaker 2: think I've ever supported federal law enforcement on any matter.
Speaker 2: So I'm very hesitant with what I'm saying. Let me
Speaker 2: be very clear, but I think it's necessary. I think
Speaker 2: that if you allowed this to go on, if you
Speaker 2: basically say we can't deport anybody, not even the violent ones,
Speaker 2: because you're gonna have there's no way to discern you
Speaker 2: have all of these protests that are stopping ICE agents
Speaker 2: from doing their job. According Tom Homan, they're going after
Speaker 2: the violent illegal immigrants. They're not even going after the
Speaker 2: line workers and shit like that. So if you can't
Speaker 2: deport the violent ones either, you are basically accepting the
Speaker 2: Cloward Piven strategy that they have put you into. And
Speaker 2: I refuse to do that. And I know that all
Speaker 2: of the worst people on earth intend to use this
Speaker 2: paradigm by which I am relegated into slavery. Maybe not
Speaker 2: physical or literal slavery, but slavery nonetheless. Now I've probably
Speaker 2: lost my entire libertarian audience during this rant. I hope not,
Speaker 2: but if I have so, be it. Now I'm gonna
Speaker 2: try and gain you back. If you've hung on this long,
Speaker 2: I'm gonna give you some red meat. This is what
Speaker 2: we ought to be really concerned about. Okay, According to
Speaker 2: John Weissman, these hexagons aren't always mq nines, but in
Speaker 2: this case, yes, there are two MQ nine Reapers over
Speaker 2: la today. Just ridiculous. Now, for those not familiar with
Speaker 2: the MQ nine Reaper, those were deployed in the Global
Speaker 2: War on Tear. It is a versatile, medium altitude, long endurance, armed,
Speaker 2: remotely piloted aircraft primarily used for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance missions,
Speaker 2: as well as strike missions against dynamic targets. So why
Speaker 2: does that matter other than the obvious that the same devices,
Speaker 2: these same fucking flying killing machines that flew over weddings
Speaker 2: throughout the Middle East and just wiped out people. Willy Nilly,
Speaker 2: oftentimes are now flying over American soil. Not fucking cool.
Speaker 2: But it gets worse. Someone I consider a bit of
Speaker 2: a friend, not fully, but we know each other. She says,
Speaker 2: this is Laura Lumer this morning. Time to deploy Pallanteer
Speaker 2: tech to Los Angeles to deal with the illegals. You'd
Speaker 2: love to see it. You're lying if you say you wouldn't. Hi,
Speaker 2: Laura Clint Russell here love to see it? No, I
Speaker 2: would not. Now why did I run that back to
Speaker 2: back with the Reaper drone? For those that don't know,
Speaker 2: the primary thing that Palanteer does, which, by the way,
Speaker 2: I'm working on a deep dive episode on Palnteer which
Speaker 2: should be out in about two days. You guys are
Speaker 2: going to want to check that one out for sure,
Speaker 2: But Palenteer's technology is capable of very high level facial
Speaker 2: recognition and database technology to cross overlay these risk assessments.
Speaker 2: Just check out the episode in a couple of days.
Speaker 2: I'll give you the full rundown. But the fact that
Speaker 2: there's m Q nine Reaper drones over Los Angeles and
Speaker 2: you have Miss Lumer posting about unleashing Palateer's technology on that,
Speaker 2: that means that Once you have the surveillance of these protests,
Speaker 2: you're able to put it into the database for palenteer
Speaker 2: by which they can use social media, everything on the
Speaker 2: internet AI. It's very high level and ultimate create a
Speaker 2: total domestic police state, surveillance state. And I'm not talking
Speaker 2: just for illegal immigrants. I'm not talking just for deportations.
Speaker 2: I'm talking about in perpetuity. I'm talking about forever, because
Speaker 2: guess what, once the government realizes what this technology is
Speaker 2: capable of, which by the way, they already have. They've
Speaker 2: already realized it when it comes to Gaza, because they're
Speaker 2: involved too, they know it will be utilized against us,
Speaker 2: and it will not just be utilized for deportations, it
Speaker 2: will be utilized forever. More So, the primary thing I
Speaker 2: want you guys to think of in your mind is
Speaker 2: this Gavin Newsom walking a trojan horse through the gates
Speaker 2: and inside it sits palaeer. Particularly if things get really
Speaker 2: out of hand, they are absolutely going to be deploying that.
Speaker 2: And the Trump administration primarily because of JD. Vance and
Speaker 2: his relationship with Peter Theal which I will get into
Speaker 2: deep detail on in a few days. The Daisy chain
Speaker 2: of contacts in this administration that leads directly to palateer
Speaker 2: is concerning. To put it mildly, the fact that you
Speaker 2: have Laura Lumer tweeting that out this morning gives me
Speaker 2: serious concern.
Speaker 7: There's something they're trying to manufacture consent for. Remember when
Speaker 7: they justified the passing of the Patriot Act over twenty
Speaker 7: years ago, they told us we needed all this extra
Speaker 7: power to go after the bad guys, to get rid
Speaker 7: of the terrorists.
Speaker 2: But almost immediately the.
Speaker 7: Government started to use that extra power they were given
Speaker 7: to spy on ordinary Americans. Right, how can you.
Speaker 2: Be so sure that.
Speaker 3: You will not be deemed an enemy of the state one.
Speaker 2: So, as RFK Junior said, any power that government takes
Speaker 2: from the people, it will never return voluntarily. Every power
Speaker 2: that government takes, it will ultimately be abused to the
Speaker 2: maximum extent possible. Nobody ever complied their way out of totalitarianism.
Speaker 2: The only thing we can do is resist. Whatever power
Speaker 2: you give the government, it will ultimately be used against you.
Speaker 2: And that must always be in the back of your mind.
Speaker 2: And I hope more than anything, whatever you conclude when
Speaker 2: it comes to the immigration issue or the border, that
Speaker 2: you think deeply before you advocate for palentnteer technology to
Speaker 2: be unleashed on the domestic population. Because if there's one
Speaker 2: thing I've learned about giving the government additional authorities, it
Speaker 2: will always end up in the hands of a president
Speaker 2: you don't trust. So if you like Donald Trump, imagine
Speaker 2: President AOC wielding the palenteered database over the American people.
Speaker 2: And if that doesn't convince you, well, then you're probably
Speaker 2: not able to be reached. Please do share it around,
Speaker 2: hit the like button, subscribe, and if you think I'm
Speaker 2: wrong about any of this, please do leave a comment
Speaker 2: down below. I do read them and I occasionally reply,
Speaker 2: depending on if you're nice to me, But most importantly,
Speaker 2: have a nice day now. If you want to support
Speaker 2: my work, I would really appreciate it. If you did,
Speaker 2: you could subscribe on my locals libertylockdown to locals dot
Speaker 2: com or on my ex at liberty lockpot and I'll
Speaker 2: follow you back. You can get cozy. Our friend Mike
Speaker 2: Lindell has a passion to help everyone get the best
Speaker 2: sleep of your life. He didn't stop by simply creating
Speaker 2: the best pillow. Mike created the best bed sheets ever.
Speaker 2: They look and feel great, which means an even better
Speaker 2: night's sleep for me, which is crucial for my busy schedule.
Speaker 2: Mike is offering the best deal on his Giza Dreams bedsheets,
Speaker 2: any size and any color, just forty nine ninety eight.
Speaker 2: I own them and they rock. That's right. You can
Speaker 2: even get queens Kings, split Kings, and cow Kings any
Speaker 2: size in any color just forty nine ninety eight. Just
Speaker 2: go to my pull dot common use promo code lockdown,
Speaker 2: get you some cozy Welcome to Liberty lockdown. Pleas gonna
Speaker 2: give wad to Liberty. Ain't come, but yeah it's on Hols.
Speaker 2: Where did it come from?
Speaker 3: And where did it go