Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: As a clock strikes thirteen, It's Columbus Day, Monday, the
Speaker 3: thirteenth of October of Our Lord, twenty twenty five. Well,
Speaker 3: today we're going to look at more Trump tacos thrown
Speaker 3: at the market, and the market had a very interesting reaction,
Speaker 3: especially crypto. So we're going to talk about that, and
Speaker 3: we're going to talk about the Trump Apocalypse that he
Speaker 3: is so excited about and doing memes about. I got
Speaker 3: my own meme because I saw a lot of work
Speaker 3: that was being done by MAGA fans cheering on police brutality,
Speaker 3: and I got to say that I just the real
Speaker 3: problem is at the grassroots level. That's what enables the
Speaker 3: kinds of things that Trump is doing. So we're going
Speaker 3: to take a look at where we are and all
Speaker 3: that and where they want us to go. The Smart cities,
Speaker 3: the Freedom Cities. There's a lot more involved in that.
Speaker 3: If you look at Peter tele and Curtis Harvin, a
Speaker 3: lot more involved in that than simply falling in line
Speaker 3: with the UN agenda. You know, they've got their own agenda.
Speaker 3: That's what makes the technocrats so dangerous. We'll be right back,
Speaker 3: stay with us. Well, another day, another capricious, arbitrary temper tent.
Speaker 3: I'm raising tariffs this time to one hundred percent on China,
Speaker 3: and it is in response in Trump's defense to China
Speaker 3: putting on new export controls on some key mineral materials
Speaker 3: and that type of thing. Does he not realize, though,
Speaker 3: that his tariffs are essentially doing the same thing on
Speaker 3: the input side for American manufacturing. We don't have the
Speaker 3: infrastructure involved here to get all this stuff done in
Speaker 3: the US. As Lance mentioned, was before somebody tried to
Speaker 3: create a very simple device and was going to have
Speaker 3: it one hundred percent sourced in America. But somebody needs
Speaker 3: to go back and read Leonard Reid's eye Pencil, which
Speaker 3: I and a lot of time on five years ago.
Speaker 3: When Trump was setting down, shutting down the supply chains
Speaker 3: and breaking them left and right, I said, you know,
Speaker 3: things have been distributed all over the place, and that
Speaker 3: isn't necessarily a bad thing. It can be done in
Speaker 3: a bad way, but we need to have the resources
Speaker 3: available to us everywhere. And when you start messing, it's
Speaker 3: not even just making something expensive. If he makes it
Speaker 3: expensive and leaves it that way. You can deal with it.
Speaker 3: People can work around that. But he's the constant chaos.
Speaker 3: It's the on again, off again, on again, off again,
Speaker 3: on again off. Nobody can operate in a situation like that.
Speaker 3: So he's deliberately shutting down our manufacturing in our farms,
Speaker 3: especially at the small and mid level. The big guys
Speaker 3: who've got deep pockets, and no matter what happens, they
Speaker 3: can continue to lose money on us and make it
Speaker 3: up on the stock market. We've seen that over and
Speaker 3: over again. So what he's doing is he's destroying the
Speaker 3: little guys. He's destroying the small and medium sized companies
Speaker 3: with this kind of reaction. And I don't disagree. Then
Speaker 3: we need to disconnect ourselves from China. I do agree
Speaker 3: with that goal, but it makes all the difference in
Speaker 3: the world how you do it or if you do it.
Speaker 3: I mean, if that's the goal, shouldn't you plan about this?
Speaker 3: This is why he's so dangerous when you look at
Speaker 3: all the different wars at Trump wants to get us into.
Speaker 3: You know, did they plan on this, do they have
Speaker 3: a plan or are they just going to jump in
Speaker 3: start shooting everybody and then react to what happens. And
Speaker 3: that's what he's doing. On an economic level. If they
Speaker 3: had a plan, they would have made sure that they
Speaker 3: secured some vital sources, for example, the rare earth minerals.
Speaker 3: They would have known that there was going to be
Speaker 3: retaliation against the farmers, and they would have been ready
Speaker 3: to go with relief from day one rather than letting
Speaker 3: the farmers die. And they still haven't done anything. They
Speaker 3: were quick to relieve Javier Malai and Argentina. That money
Speaker 3: came right away, just like that. You're just ask and
Speaker 3: he's got it. But if you are a small farmer
Speaker 3: in Arkansas, you're facing economic rain and these guys are
Speaker 3: still promising it. Someday they're going to do something about it.
Speaker 3: So don't worry. Trust the plan. Right There is no plan.
Speaker 3: That's the problem. He's got some goal that he would
Speaker 3: like to achieve. He has no plan on how to
Speaker 3: do it. He's made no preparations, He's done nothing to
Speaker 3: make it work. Trump has announced that the US oll
Speaker 3: imposed one percent terraffs on Chinese goes beginning November, the
Speaker 3: first response to what he described as Beijing's extraordinarily aggressive
Speaker 3: new trade restrictions. Beijing announced a new export controls to
Speaker 3: certain strategic minerals that have dual use in military applications,
Speaker 3: saying that the move was intended to protect national security
Speaker 3: and to meet international obligations, including those related to non proliferation,
Speaker 3: except that when Trump puts these controls on like tinplate
Speaker 3: and things like that that people are using in order
Speaker 3: to make cans so that we can put food that
Speaker 3: we grow in the cans and other things like that,
Speaker 3: when he does that, that may not be something that is
Speaker 3: being used by the military, but he's made no preparations
Speaker 3: to make sure that that's here, just like he's made
Speaker 3: no preparations to secure our rare earth supplies before he
Speaker 3: cuts them off with his temper tantrums. So large scale
Speaker 3: export controls on virtually every product they make, and some
Speaker 3: not even made by them, he said that will affect
Speaker 3: all countries without exception. Well, the ninety day pause has
Speaker 3: seen US terrace on Chinese goods fall from one hundred
Speaker 3: and forty five percent remember the bidding war that he
Speaker 3: had on this, to thirty percent. The Chinese terraces products
Speaker 3: dropped from one hundred and twenty five percent to ten percent.
Speaker 3: The extension expires in November. Trump described China's move as
Speaker 3: absolutely unheard of in international trade. Well, so is his.
Speaker 3: We've never had a situation where one individual just you know,
Speaker 3: latterly imposes trade restrictions like this and then takes them
Speaker 3: off and then puts them back on and takes them off.
Speaker 3: That is what's unprecedented. It's just amazing that he can
Speaker 3: get away with this. He says, it's a moral disgrace. Yeah,
Speaker 3: it really is. To see what he's doing. And so
Speaker 3: what has been the fallout, Well, stocks plunged in after
Speaker 3: hours trade as Trump confirmed the one hundred percent terrace
Speaker 3: and export controls on China. And of course, Michael Snyder,
Speaker 3: the Economic Collapse blog had an article about the farmers
Speaker 3: facing the worst economic downturn in at least fifty years.
Speaker 3: And I wonder what Michael Snyder has to say about Trump,
Speaker 3: because I know Michael. I've interviewed him a couple of times.
Speaker 3: He came to the studio, met him in personally, interviewed
Speaker 3: and talked afterwards. When he was there, he was getting
Speaker 3: ready to do a run for Congress in Idaho, and
Speaker 3: Gary Haven was there as well, the billionaire who did
Speaker 3: the Curves franchise, and you know, we talked and put
Speaker 3: in a good word for Michael, and I don't know
Speaker 3: what came of it. If Gary helped him. He certainly
Speaker 3: seemed like he was going to help him, but he
Speaker 3: didn't win. But I thought at the time, I thought
Speaker 3: it'd be good to have somebody who has the perspective
Speaker 3: that Michael does. But what he's showing in this article
Speaker 3: is that he would have just been another Mike Johnson.
Speaker 3: I'm ashamed to say he didn't mention Trump once. What's
Speaker 3: the matter with you, Michael? Come on, you got to
Speaker 3: talk about the key part of this problem is you know, yes,
Speaker 3: there's a structural issue with the farms. The big issue, however,
Speaker 3: what is happening right now is Trump is pouring gasoline
Speaker 3: on their fields and setting it on fire. How can
Speaker 3: you do an article about what they're facing and not
Speaker 3: mentioned Trump and this fiasco with China and shutting down
Speaker 3: the soybean market and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 3: I just don't understand it. He says. The agricultural issue
Speaker 3: in the US is deeply broken. Farmers are the foundation
Speaker 3: of it all, but they're being financially squeezed from every direction,
Speaker 3: being squeezed by the giant monopolies that control the seeds,
Speaker 3: fertilizer machinery that they need, being squeezed by giant monopolies
Speaker 3: that purchase most of what they produce. Meanwhile, demand from
Speaker 3: overseas has dried up thanks to the global trade war.
Speaker 3: That's as close as he gets. Does not mention Trump
Speaker 3: who started the global trade war. US farmers really are
Speaker 3: facing a perfect storm, and as a result, most farms
Speaker 3: are losing money and bankruptcies are surging. Yeah. Well, you
Speaker 3: know this is all deliberate from Trump, and whether or
Speaker 3: not it's a plan of his, whether or not he's
Speaker 3: doing this for Peter Thiel and Company as part of
Speaker 3: the Great Takedown, he's still pouring gasoline on the fire.
Speaker 3: Horror stories. The pain is unreal, worst farming situation I've
Speaker 3: seen in my life, says one guy with the who's
Speaker 3: the president of the Farm Protectional Alliance. He's forty years old,
Speaker 3: he said, Look at the Extension University of Arkansas numbers
Speaker 3: corn growers losing two hundred and forty acres dollars per acre,
Speaker 3: soybean losing one hundred and forty four dollars per acre,
Speaker 3: rice losing three hundred and eighty per acre, and the
Speaker 3: cotton growers may be the worst of all. And this
Speaker 3: is why we're seeing a large number of bankruptcies, especially
Speaker 3: in Arkansas. In a nutshell, we're going over a cliff
Speaker 3: in Arkansas, he said. Banks are forecasting farm bankruptcies at
Speaker 3: twenty five to forty percent, and the dirty secret is out.
Speaker 3: Everyone knows it, everyone feels it. That's why some people
Speaker 3: have said about one in three farms kind of midpoint,
Speaker 3: roughly between the twenty five to forty percent, but it
Speaker 3: could be worse. It could be forty percent, could be
Speaker 3: nearly half the farms just in that one state. The
Speaker 3: response to all that as you constantly hear Besset, Treasure
Speaker 3: Secretary Bessett saying, yeah, we're thinking about doing something. Yeah,
Speaker 3: you're thinking about it, are you? In response to what
Speaker 3: you kicked off? Why did some and then we have
Speaker 3: crypto Crypto had an aha moment here? Why did some
Speaker 3: alt coins on binance crash all the way to zero?
Speaker 3: So this is affected the stock market, it's affected the
Speaker 3: crypto market. And the thing I find interesting about this
Speaker 3: is that crypto seems to be moving not in opposition
Speaker 3: to the economy and the stock market, but in the
Speaker 3: same direction with it, which means that it's not What
Speaker 3: tells me is that it's not a it's not a
Speaker 3: hedge like gold and silver. Are briefly hit zero on
Speaker 3: Binance during Friday's crypto crash state to float elsewhere. Some
Speaker 3: of this was a liquidity issue with Binance, Bitcoin fell
Speaker 3: about ten to fifteen percent from their highs down to
Speaker 3: lows of one hundred and five thousand from one hundred
Speaker 3: and twenty four thousand. However, all coins were far worse,
Speaker 3: especially those that traded on Binance, with many of them
Speaker 3: plunging nearly one hundred percent in minutes. So one hundred
Speaker 3: percent tariffs on China and we get one hundred percent
Speaker 3: loss value on all coins. Funny how that works. It
Speaker 3: is funny how it works if you're not holding this stuff.
Speaker 3: A lot of people lost a lot of money. Nearly
Speaker 3: twenty billion dollars worth of crypto positions were liquidated, about
Speaker 3: twenty times more than during the twenty twenty COVID nineteen
Speaker 3: market route, which is also trump. Over one point six
Speaker 3: million traders lost their positions as leverage wiped them out.
Speaker 3: Million people completely wiped out with their positions on that coin.
Speaker 3: There major exchanges, including Binance, were liquidating collateral tied to
Speaker 3: cross margin positions, which exacerbated the selloff. Arthur Hayes says,
Speaker 3: we're on the street is that big exchanges auto liquidation
Speaker 3: of collateral tied to cross margin positions is why lots
Speaker 3: of aults got smoked on the move down. Congrats to
Speaker 3: all you stink bidders. We won't be seeing those levels
Speaker 3: anytime soon on high quality alts. So another guy whose
Speaker 3: cowboy says Binances once again why they're the biggest scammers
Speaker 3: and crypto During recent market crash. They froze their accounts
Speaker 3: across the board, preventing traders from accessing their funds at
Speaker 3: critical times. So it's Some analysts said that the market makers,
Speaker 3: like Winter Moot withdrew their funds from Binance due to
Speaker 3: those delays. This meant that there were no buy orders
Speaker 3: left for a few moments, so the system showed zero
Speaker 3: prices for some coins even though the tokens still had
Speaker 3: value elsewhere. This is the way stock markets crash as well,
Speaker 3: and so the question is is this is what it's
Speaker 3: going to look like when the bubble finally bursts on
Speaker 3: the Nvidia AI boom. That's going on there. What happened yesterday,
Speaker 3: says Jean Pierre Demara. He says, what happened yesterday, in
Speaker 3: my view, is that the market makers turned off their
Speaker 3: liquidity bots. As a result, all coins were left without
Speaker 3: buy orders, while stop losses were triggered, and coincidentally, Binance froze,
Speaker 3: preventing anyone from buying those buy orders would have helped
Speaker 3: absorb the cell pressure and provided liquidity during the drop.
Speaker 3: He says, to me, it all seems highly coordinated, especially
Speaker 3: considering that just moments before Winter Moot transferred seven hundred
Speaker 3: million dollars to Binance. He so, let's be real, do
Speaker 3: you really think Binance doesn't have the technology to handle
Speaker 3: a crash that without freezing, no other major exchange went down.
Speaker 3: So the real question is why did Binance freeze? He said, Well,
Speaker 3: again the crypto crash wake up call. This is also
Speaker 3: from Michael Snyder. He says, what we just saw happen
Speaker 3: was massive liquidations, break of key support levels, weak institutional
Speaker 3: flows and investor pullback, macro headwinds and bond yields and
Speaker 3: sentiment collapse. Now he's saying that it's a much bigger issue,
Speaker 3: and you did have crypto affected, Bitcoin was affected, and
Speaker 3: ethereum was affected. I look at it as you know,
Speaker 3: these all coins going to zero. That was all binance
Speaker 3: and the fact that you know a lot of these
Speaker 3: all coins are only traded on one exchange, and so
Speaker 3: that's a big issue with that. But when you look
Speaker 3: at the direction that it moves and the reaction that
Speaker 3: it has to bad economic news, that's the bigger story.
Speaker 3: I think it isn't so much that there was a
Speaker 3: hitch in these alt coins and that the crypto stuff
Speaker 3: went down on the news. To me, the issue is
Speaker 3: that it moved in tandem with the stock markets. What's
Speaker 3: going to happen with crypto when the stock market bumps
Speaker 3: collapses and it is going to collapse. It's not a
Speaker 3: matter of if, but it is a matter of when
Speaker 3: this AI thing is going to go because it's so
Speaker 3: far the hype is so far ahead of the reality.
Speaker 3: And I know that there's a reality out there of
Speaker 3: how AI can be used, but people are still looking
Speaker 3: around for how they're going to be able to use
Speaker 3: it profitably. Yes, the killer app is government surveillance and control,
Speaker 3: no doubt about that, and they can make money selling
Speaker 3: stuff to the government. However, when you look at all
Speaker 3: these other issues, the AI slop that is out there,
Speaker 3: and Deloitte and Touche or just Deloitte, I guess and
Speaker 3: other law firms that have been caught using AI to
Speaker 3: put together their audits or their briefs or whatever, and
Speaker 3: the AI making stuff up. It's not ready for primetime,
Speaker 3: and yet we have people have invested in the stock
Speaker 3: market like it's already in primetime. That's the issue, just
Speaker 3: like with the dot com bust. Was Internet real Yes?
Speaker 3: Was the Internet huge in our lives, yes, But they
Speaker 3: got ahead of everything in terms of the hype and
Speaker 3: then they panicked and ran for the exits. And that's
Speaker 3: the way these things work. In the past few days,
Speaker 3: the cryptocurrency market has undergone a sharp reversal prices across Bitcoin,
Speaker 3: ethereum and many prominent alt coins of collapse, liquidating billions
Speaker 3: and speculative bets, rattling investor confidence. This is not merely
Speaker 3: a garden variety pullback. It is a wake up call
Speaker 3: that the crypto space may be dangerously overextended and fragile
Speaker 3: under stress, far more risky than many public narratives will
Speaker 3: admit agree with him on that.
Speaker 4: So when you look at who generally invests in the
Speaker 4: crypto space, it's mostly younger guys who are just incredibly bullish.
Speaker 4: They're just you know, crypto's going to the moon. I'm
Speaker 4: going to invest in this coin, this coin, that coin,
Speaker 4: whatever coin I think might be next. It's it's incredibly speculative.
Speaker 4: None of it is really based on any sort of Oh,
Speaker 4: I think this actually has real world utility. It's all
Speaker 4: a bunch of well, this one I think could explode.
Speaker 4: I think this one might be the next one that
Speaker 4: takes to gamble.
Speaker 3: It's a gamble, and sometimes they put too much into it,
Speaker 3: and they gambles too much.
Speaker 4: That market is always going to be incredibly volatile just
Speaker 4: based on who is involved with it. It's not based
Speaker 4: on reality. It's all based on I'm going to get rich.
Speaker 4: This is going to be the next one that takes off.
Speaker 3: And that's the characteristics of all the bubbles. Once you
Speaker 3: get a lot of people in who have you know,
Speaker 3: they're not really looking at fundamentals or long term investment.
Speaker 3: They're just playing a hunch, right, and they're gambling. And
Speaker 3: then when things start to go bad, you know, they're
Speaker 3: watching this and the first sign that something.
Speaker 4: Better, I gotta get out. I gotta get out. I'm
Speaker 4: gonna lose it all.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So first they get in for fear of missing out,
Speaker 3: and then they jump out for fear'st thying in. And
Speaker 3: that's what creates these situations. Like I said, I lost
Speaker 3: a lot of money in the dot com bust because
Speaker 3: I looked at it and I said, yeah, the Internet
Speaker 3: is for real, absolutely for real. And I didn't even
Speaker 3: want to pick a particular stock like Amazon or whatever,
Speaker 3: but I wanted to invest in the switching equipment that
Speaker 3: was going to be used to build the Internet. I
Speaker 3: thought that was a safe bet. Everybody got hammered. Everybody
Speaker 3: got hammered. I mean you saw Intel anything, but you
Speaker 3: know all all the big tell communication companies, even some
Speaker 3: of the others like GDS, Uniphase building switching equipment. I mean,
Speaker 3: it was just blood in the streets when happened, because
Speaker 3: it was mass panic. And I then looked back on
Speaker 3: it and laugh now, but it was not funny at
Speaker 3: the time. So liquidity is thinner than advertised narratives mask
Speaker 3: real risks, and it is a stress test for confidence,
Speaker 3: which they didn't do too well. So the bigger picture,
Speaker 3: says Michael Snyder, is a crypto reckoning crashes more than
Speaker 3: temporary shakeout. It may signal deeper structural tension in the cryptoeconomy.
Speaker 3: The industry has long relied on narratives and forward looking
Speaker 3: valuations and not on stable cash flows or durable foundations,
Speaker 3: and in tough conditions, these beliefs fail first, So does
Speaker 3: have an effective risk structure. And again, even that is
Speaker 3: getting out ahead of things because Lucky Lutnik and Trump
Speaker 3: have not put in their crypto scam foundation yet, so
Speaker 3: you know, they've not started buying the buying into crypto,
Speaker 3: and they've not started with a stable coin propping that
Speaker 3: up in the way that they are going to prop
Speaker 3: it up. So I think that the story for that
Speaker 3: is better in the long term, but who knows what's
Speaker 3: going to happen in the short term. It's it truly
Speaker 3: is crazy. So meanwhile, on the metal side, you're seeing
Speaker 3: things like this one way to position for one hundred
Speaker 3: dollars silver? Is that crazy? I mean, you know, has
Speaker 3: I just ask you this? Are we looking at an
Speaker 3: economy that is more stable and the foundations are starting
Speaker 3: to get aligned, right, now or is it getting shakier
Speaker 3: than it has been over the last year where we
Speaker 3: saw the price of silver already double once and I
Speaker 3: know that sounds crazy, but following a run up on
Speaker 3: the goal market where it has gone up more than
Speaker 3: fifty one percent a year to date, silver is now
Speaker 3: seventy three percent up. And so again just mentioned David
Speaker 3: Knight dot Gold, which take you to Tony ardabund Wolfpack.
Speaker 3: If you want to start collecting something that's going to
Speaker 3: be a hedge against what is coming, you can do
Speaker 3: that on a gradual basis with Wolfpack. I don't know
Speaker 3: anybody it does anything like that. Of course, Tony can
Speaker 3: handle your gold and silver transactions. He can convert bitcoin
Speaker 3: to gold or silver as well without a fee, he said.
Speaker 3: And so just to go to David and I Dike Gold,
Speaker 3: I let them know that you're coming through us and
Speaker 3: you need to get into something that is real. Gold's
Speaker 3: acceleration reveals a vanishing calm and coming change. That's right.
Speaker 3: It only took two days for it to go from
Speaker 3: three thousand to four thousand. It's almost difficult to remember,
Speaker 3: really that when that was a really big look when
Speaker 3: over three thousand then now it's over four thousand. These
Speaker 3: are the kind of psychological barriers that break these things.
Speaker 3: And as John Rabino has been warning of a currency
Speaker 3: crisis for several years now, it's not just the US dollar,
Speaker 3: it's not just the euro, it's not just the end.
Speaker 3: Everything is up in the air. And that's why all
Speaker 3: the central banks are all collecting gold. They all see
Speaker 3: what is on the horizon. We have massive debt that
Speaker 3: is unfunded except by crypto and monetizing of the debt.
Speaker 3: But we're not the only country doing it. This crazy
Speaker 3: thing is that Germany just started doing this massive deficit
Speaker 3: financing so they could ramp up their dead military industrial complex.
Speaker 3: They jump in at the tail in the bubble. Nobody
Speaker 3: told Fred Mertz what was going on. Lucy's gonna have
Speaker 3: somes planning to do here. Gold is saying that the
Speaker 3: fiat currency experiment is ending globally. That's what Rubina says.
Speaker 3: He said, if you watch the financial press, they're noting
Speaker 3: that the price of gold is going up, but they're
Speaker 3: treating it like any other asset. He said, gold is
Speaker 3: humanity's oldest form of money, so that when it goes
Speaker 3: up in price, that means that the currencies against it,
Speaker 3: which we're measuring it, are going down in value. What
Speaker 3: we're seeing all around the world is fiat currencies declineing
Speaker 3: and value dramatically, especially against gold. Gold just in the
Speaker 3: last couple of weeks pierced. Not just it's all time
Speaker 3: nominal high, but it's all time inflation adjusted high. This
Speaker 3: is a much bigger deal because we've had so much
Speaker 3: inflation in the last thirty or forty years. Basically, gold
Speaker 3: is saying that the fiat currency experiment is ending. In
Speaker 3: other words, the monetary system we set up in nineteen
Speaker 3: seventy one, we went off the gold standard. Brentwoods too.
Speaker 3: This led countries to create way too much debt, increase
Speaker 3: their spending dramatically, and basically make all the mistakes that
Speaker 3: a human makes when you give them an unlimited credit card.
Speaker 3: Now we're burdened with that we cannot pay off and
Speaker 3: people expect to be taken care of. France is a
Speaker 3: good example of this. He said. Governments around the world
Speaker 3: are forced to buy more and more money to cover
Speaker 3: the obligations they've taken on and to cover the interest
Speaker 3: costs on their debt. This requires them to print more money,
Speaker 3: and that is lowering the value of the currencies even
Speaker 3: more quickly. This basically will lead to a currency death spiral,
Speaker 3: and that is where we are right now, because we're
Speaker 3: in that death spiral right now. And the thing I
Speaker 3: find interesting is that I would have thought that bitcoin
Speaker 3: would be something of a counter to that, but it
Speaker 3: doesn't appear to be. When things get tough, it doesn't
Speaker 3: hang tough in order for gold to service foundation for
Speaker 3: the next monetary system. That's why they're accumulating so much gold.
Speaker 3: You can see it even with the bricks people right
Speaker 3: They're trying to set up their own system. So where
Speaker 3: do they go to back it up? They go to gold.
Speaker 3: They want to get out of this system that's been
Speaker 3: weaponized against them. They want to set up a new one.
Speaker 3: So that's why they're accumulating gold. As we did in
Speaker 3: the classical gold standard that was in place up until
Speaker 3: World War One. If we went back to that, you
Speaker 3: would need a gold price of around twenty thousand dollars
Speaker 3: an ounce. Would need this to back all the currencies
Speaker 3: that are out there now. And if we keep doing
Speaker 3: what we're doing now, the Fiat currencies would go to zero,
Speaker 3: which means the gold would go to infinity. My guess
Speaker 3: on the future goal price is somewhere between twenty thousand
Speaker 3: in infinity to infinity and beyond. That's a you're going
Speaker 3: to take the buzz light your approach to the price
Speaker 3: of gold. But the bottom line is that you know
Speaker 3: that may be an optimistic scenario for a gold investor. However,
Speaker 3: when you look at the foundation that is there, the
Speaker 3: question is you know not it still looks good as
Speaker 3: regardless of what the next limit is. As a matter
Speaker 3: of fact, another guy, Hartnett, said the gold is going
Speaker 3: to be six thousand dollars by next spring. I mean,
Speaker 3: keep seeing conservative things coming out of Bank of American
Speaker 3: Goldman Sacks saying, well, I think it's going to be
Speaker 3: four thousand second quarter next year. Well mate, it hits
Speaker 3: four thousand right after they say that, now go up
Speaker 3: to like forty nine hundred. They're very conservative on what
Speaker 3: they do. But this guy is saying six thousand, Orbinos
Speaker 3: saying twenty thousand. Eventually where this all goes. So the
Speaker 3: question is what will be meltdown on Friday due to
Speaker 3: Trump's response, what will that feel like today? What kind
Speaker 3: of a meltdown are we going to see in the
Speaker 3: market today, and of course nobody knows. Nobody can predict
Speaker 3: the markets in advance, they can rig the markets in advance.
Speaker 3: But you know this is all again the let's not
Speaker 3: forget what kicked off this whole thing. You know who
Speaker 3: lit the fire is Donald Trump? Who lit the fire
Speaker 3: on this, no doubt about it. And so the big
Speaker 3: crash are we're headed for another? Nineteen twenty nine. This
Speaker 3: is from the Telegraph UK looking at a hypothetical sin
Speaker 3: where a global financial crisis could occur during a combination
Speaker 3: of factors including a bursting AI bubble highly likely, a
Speaker 3: dead crisis highly likely, and a loss of confidence in
Speaker 3: the US dollar also highly likely. The article also highlights
Speaker 3: the parallels between the current situations and the events leading
Speaker 3: up to the Great Depression, as I covered twenty twenty seven,
Speaker 3: and the poly crisis that financial markets have long feared
Speaker 3: is unfolding at speed. Putin has made a strong gains
Speaker 3: and has war against Ukraine and begun massing troops at
Speaker 3: Europe's border and readiness for an invasion of one or
Speaker 3: more of the Baltic states in the Far East. And
Speaker 3: again I don't this is the Telegraph, I don't think
Speaker 3: that that I could be wrong. I don't know what's
Speaker 3: in Putin's mind, but you know, if NATO felt that
Speaker 3: it was in their best interests to constantly push, push,
Speaker 3: push towards Russia, then to use surrogates to attack Russia,
Speaker 3: perhaps Putin would do that. I don't see that their
Speaker 3: beef in Ukraine is a domino theory situation, like they
Speaker 3: lied to us about Vietnam. But it could be that
Speaker 3: maybe he realizes that, you know, he gets into an
Speaker 3: existential fight. Perhaps he would come after the countries of Europe.
Speaker 3: I don't know. In the Far East, China's Shuji Ping
Speaker 3: is openly preparing for his long promise assault on Taiwan,
Speaker 3: and boldened by both Putin's success and Trump's drubbing in
Speaker 3: the congressional midterms, which has significantly reduced the US's scope
Speaker 3: for effective retaliation. In the Middle East, the fragile peace
Speaker 3: secured by Trump and twenty twenty five has already falling apart,
Speaker 3: plunging the region into a nuwe conflict. And look, we'll
Speaker 3: talk about that. We'll talk about Cutter and their role
Speaker 3: in it, and the things that were tied to Cutter,
Speaker 3: the military base, the arms deal, the golf course, so
Speaker 3: many different things that this is just the Trump economics
Speaker 3: here and Trump diplomacy. It's like, where's my cut. It's
Speaker 3: I just can't I just can't find the words to
Speaker 3: adequately express my contempt for what the man is doing.
Speaker 3: He's just in every arena. So this is their their scenario. Okay,
Speaker 3: just take things where they are right now and tweak
Speaker 3: them a little bit to the bad side, which is
Speaker 3: very probable. For all this, I don't know that, you know,
Speaker 3: Putin feels strong enough to take on all of Europe
Speaker 3: and the US. I think for the most part this
Speaker 3: has been something of a defensive war. Frankly, but I
Speaker 3: was surprised when he went into Ukraine. I thought that
Speaker 3: was a bad move. I thought when he did that,
Speaker 3: he basically fed their narrative. And so I don't know
Speaker 3: about that. But the rest of stuff is pretty straightforward.
Speaker 3: On the stock markets, it's ma'am. Trillions of dollars of
Speaker 3: losses are being inflicted on the one time boom sector
Speaker 3: of artificial intelligence. With the global economy on the brinker
Speaker 3: recesion of unemployment climbing sharply, it's clear that the market
Speaker 3: for AI services has been grossly overestimated. They got way
Speaker 3: ahead of themselves. And I think I saw this early
Speaker 3: because of my own personal experience with a dot com bust.
Speaker 3: A lot of people I think were slow to see
Speaker 3: it because they didn't get Sometimes when you get that
Speaker 3: upside the head with a two by four, you sometimes
Speaker 3: learn something from it. By yeah, I think I got
Speaker 3: hit harder than most of these people who are predicting
Speaker 3: the Rosie scenario for AI. Despite promises made my AI evangelist,
Speaker 3: productivity is flatlining and far from improving output. Reports suggests
Speaker 3: AI is damaging many businesses where it has been most
Speaker 3: ferverently applied. Such some claims on which AI has been
Speaker 3: sold to investors and lenders even turn out to be
Speaker 3: overtly fraudulent. Many of the mega deals that characterize the
Speaker 3: latter stages of the Great AI gold rush, with customers
Speaker 3: and suppliers ancestuously taking cross holdings in one another. That's
Speaker 3: the circular investment we see going on with Nvidia and
Speaker 3: some of its customers are fast unraveling in an orgy
Speaker 3: of litigation, broken promises, and scattered expectations. But that's not
Speaker 3: all overlaying the stock market crash is a debt crisis
Speaker 3: of monstrous proportions almost everywhere. Bond market investors are on strike,
Speaker 3: and interest rates are rocketing. In other words, nobody's buying
Speaker 3: the government debt anymore because they don't believe they're going
Speaker 3: to get paid. Global governments are struggling both to refinance
Speaker 3: mountainous debts and to fund ballooning expenditures. Private credit, a
Speaker 3: form of finance that is flourished outside the conventional, most
Speaker 3: more tightly regulated banking system, is in a meltdown, with
Speaker 3: a folly of lending to higher risk enterprises able to
Speaker 3: access credit elsewhere, now cruelly exposed for all to see,
Speaker 3: you know, kind of like the subprime loans that we saw.
Speaker 3: The only thing that he doesn't have factored in here
Speaker 3: is that I think Lucky Lutnik in Bessett, I think
Speaker 3: these guys are really clever. What they do mean best.
Speaker 3: It was with sorrows when he broke the Bank of England.
Speaker 3: So these guys know what they're doing when it comes
Speaker 3: to money. They're fiendishly good at it. And that's what
Speaker 3: I think this whole stable coin thing is. It's not
Speaker 3: that the coin itself is stable, but it's there to
Speaker 3: stabilize the government's debt and to take it out to
Speaker 3: the retail level, so that is the one thing that
Speaker 3: may come through. I don't know. So bad is a
Speaker 3: shock that the whole construct of competing FIAT currencies on
Speaker 3: which the world's financial architecture is built seems to be crumbling,
Speaker 3: and instead states are hurriedly erecting financial border controls and
Speaker 3: a fusual attempt to stop the investors who haven't lost
Speaker 3: every thing fleeing for safer shores. But those investors are
Speaker 3: realizing a dreadful truth. Even if you can get your
Speaker 3: money out, there appears to be no safe place left
Speaker 3: to put it. So this, of course is a wholly
Speaker 3: imagined doomsday future. Yet finance is built entirely on trust
Speaker 3: and confidence, and rarely has it looked quite so fragile
Speaker 3: as it does today. Even the usually sleepy Bank of
Speaker 3: England and the IMF have now taken to warning about
Speaker 3: the possibilities of a sharp, destabilizing correction in the stock markets,
Speaker 3: all puffed up as they are by fevered speculation over
Speaker 3: the potentially transformative powers of AI valuations are stretched to
Speaker 3: the breaking point, with the so called Schuller cyclically adjusted
Speaker 3: price earnings ratio, which I've never heard of before, generally
Speaker 3: regarded as the most reliable indicator where the markets. Where
Speaker 3: the market is relative to past peaks. It's close to
Speaker 3: the all time high they recorded during the dot com bubble,
Speaker 3: and slightly higher than it was before the great crash
Speaker 3: of nineteen twenty nine. The parallels of previous market manias
Speaker 3: are striking. So is this nineteen twenty nine all over again?
Speaker 3: Surely not. We are all too clever, far too clever,
Speaker 3: worldly wise, and conditioned by the disastrous consequences of the
Speaker 3: most famous of all stock market crashes to let it
Speaker 3: happen again. It's unthinkable, or is it? When a banking
Speaker 3: titan is seasoned as Jamie Demon, chief executive of JP Morgan,
Speaker 3: openly expresses his concern, it's time to sit up and
Speaker 3: take notice. He said in an interview last week that
Speaker 3: he's far more worried than others about the possibility of
Speaker 3: a serious market collapse. There were a lot of things
Speaker 3: out there, he said, creating an atmosphere of uncertainty, and
Speaker 3: he went on citing geopolitical instability, unaffordable state spending, remilitarization
Speaker 3: because he could sum it up by Saint Trump. Yet,
Speaker 3: if it's not clear which needle will burst the bubble,
Speaker 3: there's no doubt about the bubble itself. The AI hype
Speaker 3: is off the scale with a big prize dominance, not
Speaker 3: of the generative AI chatbots, so we've already become accustomed
Speaker 3: to using but if so called general artificial intelligence, so
Speaker 3: computers with cognitive powers similar to a human being, only
Speaker 3: infinitely faster and more powerful. The dangers of AI fever
Speaker 3: are not just an unhinged stock market speculation, such as
Speaker 3: the magnitude of investment in AI data centers. That's going
Speaker 3: to be a huge disruption to our power grid. And
Speaker 3: you know we're going to be able to make anything
Speaker 3: that's real when we are using all our power to
Speaker 3: entertain ourselves in a fantasy cyber world. That's the question.
Speaker 3: And so it is really destructive of capital, that is
Speaker 3: destructive of power for the grid, It's destructive of so
Speaker 3: many different things. And in terms of we can, like
Speaker 3: Cory Doctorowe said, look, the AI may not be able
Speaker 3: to replace you, but your boss might fire you if
Speaker 3: he thinks that it can't. And even if the AI
Speaker 3: can't do the job, you won't have a job either.
Speaker 3: That's his point. So they're obviously they're believing the hype
Speaker 3: because they're investing big dollars in it. We've already seen
Speaker 3: a lot of tech companies very early on fire, massive
Speaker 3: numbers of people, and you know where they replaced that equately, Well,
Speaker 3: we don't know. Rarely, if ever, I have. The fortunes
Speaker 3: of the world economy depends so precariously on the judgment
Speaker 3: of a small cluster of men, the bosses of Meta Alphabet, Microsoft,
Speaker 3: Apple x, Amazon and others, who are chasing the crock
Speaker 3: of gold at the end of the AI rainbow. Well, again,
Speaker 3: even in that metaphor, we always go back to gold
Speaker 3: at the end of the rainbow. You know, you don't
Speaker 3: have to you don't have to follow their rainbow to
Speaker 3: get to the gold. You can go to David Knightie
Speaker 3: gold giants say, this time is different. Unlike the dot
Speaker 3: com bubble, which is characterized by lots of aspiring wing
Speaker 3: and a prayer enterprises of hardly any substance, the current
Speaker 3: investment boom is substantially led by a small number of
Speaker 3: well established cash ridge mega companies easily capable of absorbing
Speaker 3: the new industry's heavy upfront costs. What's more, they claim
Speaker 3: AI promise is an economic miracle that will render current
Speaker 3: concerns about spiraling deficits and physical black holes almost wholly
Speaker 3: irrelevant with stellar growth fast eroting national debt piles. And again,
Speaker 3: I think this is a nat You take George Gilder
Speaker 3: in his book Life After Google, so we wrote it.
Speaker 3: He was past eighty and he said, but I think
Speaker 3: I'm going to lift to see Google going down, And
Speaker 3: so I said, I certainly hope he's right, but who knows.
Speaker 3: If it's to go down, it's going to have to
Speaker 3: be a crash of this type of bangude. And the
Speaker 3: fundamental flaw behind the technocracy is that they believe that
Speaker 3: their technology, especially AI are AI, robotics and nanotech, all
Speaker 3: of the awful stuff genetics included. They think that they
Speaker 3: are at the cusp of a situation where there'll be
Speaker 3: so much resources that they just have to allocate it,
Speaker 3: and they will be the ones to allocate it. And
Speaker 3: this is the same fantasy that Carl Marx had about
Speaker 3: the Industrial Revolution, so scarcity, Yeah, that's right. That's why
Speaker 3: George Gilder calls them neo Marxists, because that's the fundamental
Speaker 3: conceit flawed, conceit of Marxism, and these people have bought
Speaker 3: into that as well. And just like the communist bosses,
Speaker 3: they're going to take everything. You know, it's going to
Speaker 3: be true for them, but it's not going to be
Speaker 3: true for us.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Back when I was hosting the show Sol, that's
Speaker 4: what I kept saying, is just the AI doesn't have
Speaker 4: to be capable of doing your job. Well, yeah, it
Speaker 4: just has to be capable enough that your boss thinks
Speaker 4: that it's worthwhile. They just have to look at it
Speaker 4: and say, all right, the product is going to get worse,
Speaker 4: But is it going to get so much worse that
Speaker 4: we're going to lose customers? How many customers are going
Speaker 4: to lose? How much are we saving? It just has
Speaker 4: to be the right value proposition, the right risk versus
Speaker 4: reward analysis, cost benefit analysis for them is everything. If
Speaker 4: it makes them a little bit more money than it
Speaker 4: does keeping you on staff, they will gut the entire program.
Speaker 4: They will make it borderline unusable, just so long as
Speaker 4: it keeps making them more money, that's right.
Speaker 5: So they have any commitment to quality with these things,
Speaker 5: as we've seen with the constant intification of everything.
Speaker 4: They'll fire a billion Indians.
Speaker 3: That's right. Well, the a's headline after headline talking about
Speaker 3: how Trump triggered a crypto crash, Markets brace for chaos
Speaker 3: after Trump triggers a record breaking crypto crash and the
Speaker 3: crypto carnage Trump tariff tape bomb triggers largest liquidation event
Speaker 3: and history for crypto. This is a guy that's going
Speaker 3: to be so good for crypto. And of course he
Speaker 3: is going to be good, has been good for crypto,
Speaker 3: and will be good for crypto. The problem is that
Speaker 3: he's just bad for the economy in general. Anything that again,
Speaker 3: it goes back to this tariff thing, right, a bad decision.
Speaker 3: The way that he's running the terra stuff on again,
Speaker 3: off again, on again, off again destroys everything. Even the
Speaker 3: industries that he's heavily trying to subsidize and build up,
Speaker 3: he's destroying. And then we take industries that are already
Speaker 3: struggling for a number of reasons, like farming. It's just
Speaker 3: catastrophic what he's doing. And this all comes from our
Speaker 3: dear leader who has determined that he's going to arbitrarri
Speaker 3: lin capriciously make these decisions, and everybody's just laying down
Speaker 3: and letting him do it. I can't I can believe
Speaker 3: that Mike Johnson is going to let him do it.
Speaker 3: I just can't believe that the courts are letting him
Speaker 3: do it. They're moving so excruciatingly slow. And that's the
Speaker 3: key thing. And we're going to talk about this when
Speaker 3: we talk about after the break. We're going to talk
Speaker 3: about what's going on with the Trump Apocalypse that he's
Speaker 3: so happy about, you know, the meme Chicago apocalypse, the
Speaker 3: Chai apocalypse or whatever. He jumps in and does these things.
Speaker 3: His mode of operation is to declare an emergency and
Speaker 3: then to say, because I have declared an emergency, now
Speaker 3: I can do anything I want, and then to fake
Speaker 3: his authority until somebody shuts him down because Congress isn't
Speaker 3: going to push back against him, and the Supreme Court
Speaker 3: takes about a year before it can even put its
Speaker 3: pants on. That's about the worried pants on of the rope.
Speaker 3: But they don't do anything, and so he is faking
Speaker 3: it and making it without having any authority on this.
Speaker 3: So meanwhile, you have a question as to this crypto
Speaker 3: crash an early bitcoin well short did one point one
Speaker 3: billion dollars right before the tariffs and made twenty seven
Speaker 3: million dollars on this. How did he know that was
Speaker 3: going to happen? And so was there insider trading going on?
Speaker 3: Let me tell you when they crash the markets, when
Speaker 3: they crashed the crypto markets, the stock markets and other things,
Speaker 3: people like Lucky Lutnik and Lucky Donald are going to
Speaker 3: have some insider stuff that's going on. They're going to
Speaker 3: know when they creator this stuff, and they're going to
Speaker 3: make sure that they come out on the other side.
Speaker 5: I saw some news late last night about a account
Speaker 5: that was created right before all this happened that did
Speaker 5: a massive short.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, going back to nine to eleven, right, same
Speaker 3: type of stuff, and they got away with it nine
Speaker 3: to eleven. They will get away with it this time
Speaker 3: and over again, no doubt about it. So you create
Speaker 3: an account and then you crash the market, and you know,
Speaker 3: you create account and it shorts the bitcoin and make
Speaker 3: twenty seven million dollars just like that.
Speaker 4: There's also the fact that even if someone weren't specifically
Speaker 4: doing this like I think they are, with the sheer
Speaker 4: number of people that have to be involved with the
Speaker 4: administration that know what's going on, someone is going to
Speaker 4: tell somebody else. Someone is going to find out and
Speaker 4: they will make that play. So even if they're not
Speaker 4: specifically going, I got a tip for you, you need to
Speaker 4: do this. That's right, someone is just going it'll disseminate,
Speaker 4: it'll reach somebody.
Speaker 3: And you'll do it in a plausibly deniable way.
Speaker 4: But yeah, I just got lucky. What can I say?
Speaker 4: Sometimes you lose it all, sometimes make one hundred and
Speaker 4: sixty million dollars.
Speaker 3: Well, look at what this whale did. A tenfold leveraged
Speaker 3: short on six nine bitcoin valued at seven hundred and
Speaker 3: fifty two point nine million dollars with a liquidation price
Speaker 3: of a high undred thirty eight ten, and a twelve
Speaker 3: time leverage short on ethereum worth three hundred and fifty
Speaker 3: three million with a liquidation price of forty five hundred dollars.
Speaker 3: The timing sparked widespread speculation about insider knowledge, with a
Speaker 3: trader doubling down on the shorts just thirty minutes before
Speaker 3: Trump's tariff announcement. The most corrupt.
Speaker 4: Nothing suspicious to see here, the.
Speaker 3: Most corrupt administration perhaps we've ever had, certainly in terms
Speaker 3: of dollar amounts. The ulysses Grant administration can't hold a
Speaker 3: candle to this one, but yeah, it is truly amazing
Speaker 3: what he's been able to do here. According to on
Speaker 3: chain enlist my MLMABC, the whale approximately ninety percent of
Speaker 3: bitcoin shorts and completed completely exited ethereum at the bottom
Speaker 3: of the pocketing between one hundred ninety million and two
Speaker 3: hundred million in realized profits within a single day. In
Speaker 3: case you didn't know, the bitcoin well crossed ninety percent
Speaker 3: of his bitcoin short and fully closed on his ethereum short,
Speaker 3: making around one hundred and ninety two hundred million dollar
Speaker 3: profit in just one day. That was the tweet that
Speaker 3: spent out by MLM ABC. Look on chain data. The
Speaker 3: trader began accumulating the short positions on October ninth by
Speaker 3: depositing eighty million US dollars into hyper liquid, followed by
Speaker 3: additional deposits totaling tens of millions throughout the week leading
Speaker 3: up to the crash. The market collapse triggered over one
Speaker 3: point six million liquidations and twenty four hours, wiping out
Speaker 3: twenty billion dollars in positions. According to coin glass data,
Speaker 3: the liquidation figure floating around is fake, says MLMABC, the
Speaker 3: real number is likely much higher, somewhere in the thirty
Speaker 3: to forty billion dollar range. Long positions accounted for seventeen
Speaker 3: billion dollars of those losses, while shorts contributed to two
Speaker 3: and a half billion bitcoin. Ethereum lead liquidations at five
Speaker 3: billion and four billion, respectively, followed by Solana at two billion,
Speaker 3: and a ripple XRP at seven hundred and eight million.
Speaker 3: Hyper Liquid saw the largest single liquidation, an ethereum dollar position,
Speaker 3: worth two hundred and three million dollars. So again, when
Speaker 3: we look at the fraud that is possible with this stuff,
Speaker 3: and the other thing is that immediately they can go
Speaker 3: back and put these numbers together. Why because all the
Speaker 3: transactions are public for everybody to see. There's nothing encrypted
Speaker 3: about in crypto except for the handshaking when you process
Speaker 3: the transaction from one I understand, but the blockchain itself
Speaker 3: is fully public, So all the records are there. We
Speaker 3: can piece of stuff together immediately. That's how they immediately
Speaker 3: know that there's a whale there. With other forms of investment,
Speaker 3: it takes a while to go back and get the records,
Speaker 3: and the records are not available to the general public.
Speaker 3: This stuff is so Trump better watch itself. It's pretty amazing.
Speaker 3: So the massive fraud that is involved in all this stuff, well,
Speaker 3: we're going to take a quick break before we do,
Speaker 3: let's read some of the comments here.
Speaker 4: That's right, con think, thank you very much. You appreciate it.
Speaker 4: This piece in the Middle East, now to Ukraine, and
Speaker 4: we still want the Epstein file. That's right. Still going
Speaker 4: to turn those over.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and we'll see if that piece lasts though.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Israel hasn't been known for keeping their peace agreements.
Speaker 4: They've been known for breaking them and finding reasons to
Speaker 4: do so. Guard Goldsmith seriously, though, the Trump attacks are
Speaker 4: getting me to make a lot of changes and purchases.
Speaker 4: I started buying extra caned goods a couple of weeks ago,
Speaker 4: but they don't carry Prince Albert my supermarket. Is that
Speaker 4: a Is that a canned food? I'm a I'm not
Speaker 4: up on my canned food brands, but if you say
Speaker 4: they're good, I trust guards A painon.
Speaker 3: I'm thinking Prince Albert might be like, is that chewing?
Speaker 3: To back up? What is that guard? It's that pipe pipe?
Speaker 3: Put that in your pipe and smoke it. I don't
Speaker 3: know that's right.
Speaker 4: You got a stock up on rikotine.
Speaker 3: You lost us on that reference. I have to explain further.
Speaker 4: Make sure you've got some bottle caps as well. You
Speaker 4: want all the potential currencies gold, silver, nicotine, and alcohol.
Speaker 3: Bulldog.
Speaker 4: I'm just looking at bitcoin. It dropped from one twenty
Speaker 4: five to one fourteen today, and of course that's one
Speaker 4: hundred and twenty and fourteen thousand real. Jason Barker was
Speaker 4: just at my aunts and her husband's family just harvested
Speaker 4: their soybeans and have to sit on them now to
Speaker 4: wait for someone who will buy.
Speaker 3: Oh, I'm sorry to hear that. Yeah. Yeah, because the
Speaker 3: other thing is not only is China not buying, but
Speaker 3: now there's a g lot of soybean on the market,
Speaker 3: so the price for soybean has dropped, unfortunately for themselves.
Speaker 3: To anybody, Yeah, Mama c.
Speaker 4: Nineteen ninety six. Our grand elevators have huge piles of soybeans.
Speaker 4: We'll see if they can sell them or not. Real,
Speaker 4: Jason Barker, this is an attack on independent farmers to
Speaker 4: help big Agra snatch up farmland.
Speaker 3: I absolutely agree with that. You're absolutely you and I
Speaker 3: see this exactly the same way. I think this is
Speaker 3: deliberate and I think it's also Jason. I think it's
Speaker 3: also Jason Barker nice of the storm. I think it
Speaker 3: is also a deliberate attack on all small and medium
Speaker 3: size manufacturers. I mean, it's just been it's been very
Speaker 3: difficult if you're making something at all here in America.
Speaker 3: Trump has cut the legs out from underneath you because
Speaker 3: you've got to get some of the supplies or abroad,
Speaker 3: and nobody knows what to do. You know, are the
Speaker 3: tariff's going to be twenty percent, are they going to
Speaker 3: be fifty percent? Are they going to drop down below
Speaker 3: twenty percent? I don't know. So how do you jump
Speaker 3: into a market light that once you jump in, the
Speaker 3: chances there begetting burned are huge. So everybody's sitting on
Speaker 3: the sidelines and they can't afford to do anything. And
Speaker 3: the small to medium sized people out there have to
Speaker 3: compete with these giant guys anyway, and so they can't
Speaker 3: raise their prices and they're swallowing these tariffs when they
Speaker 3: go up on cost. And they can't do that indefinitely
Speaker 3: because they don't have an infinite supply of capital like
Speaker 3: the big box retailers do on Wall Street. I mean,
Speaker 3: they operate as if they are government that's running on
Speaker 3: fiat currency. They have fiat paper stock, which allows them
Speaker 3: to put out a nice narrative and collect capital. But
Speaker 3: small and medium sized businesses have to work on the
Speaker 3: reality of the free marketplace. And Trump is killing them,
Speaker 3: absolutely killing him same thing he did five years ago,
Speaker 3: just a different way.
Speaker 4: Steve Evs at sd Bullion gold Over forty Rev. Seventy nine,
Speaker 4: seventy nine big shorts in the last bitcoin crash?
Speaker 3: Yeah, who would have thought that Trump would have big.
Speaker 4: Shorts guard Goldsmith. The bitcoin short sales set up that
Speaker 4: shook things early came from what appears to be a
Speaker 4: political insider knowledge connection because I knew Trump would confirm
Speaker 4: as one hundred percent tariff on China. You know, there's
Speaker 4: always there's always insider trading going on when it's these
Speaker 4: people involved.
Speaker 3: Rev.
Speaker 4: Seventy nine.
Speaker 3: Let me interject here, the insider trading is so rampant.
Speaker 3: That's why I don't bother with the stock market, and
Speaker 3: the insider trading on crypto is going to be that
Speaker 3: way as well, because the people like Lutin, make Combescent
Speaker 3: and Trump that are all in on it. I don't
Speaker 3: tell me that that's not going to be manipulated insider trading,
Speaker 3: just like the Yes stock market is. Yeah.
Speaker 4: Rev seventy nine, seventy nine. Nothing is more stable than
Speaker 4: tangible assets in your hand, like brass bullets. That's right,
Speaker 4: get yourself some brass, some lead. Tyler Rob twenty two.
Speaker 4: We farm and he's exactly right. Commodity prices are in
Speaker 4: the tank, the real octos spook. Trump is sending long
Speaker 4: range missiles into the Ukraine and American contractors are now
Speaker 4: arming them and they're being launched into Russia.
Speaker 3: I think he deserves a peace price for that, don't you.
Speaker 4: I've been the best president on peace possibly ever. Wally Wallers,
Speaker 4: My wolf fat gold is holding its value. I've been
Speaker 4: stocking up on gold backs as well. Excited about the
Speaker 4: Texas gold backs coming soon. Steve Evs, I just can't
Speaker 4: get into any crypto. I trust things that are in
Speaker 4: my hand. I don't fault anyone in crypto. I just
Speaker 4: don't trust it. Yeah, that's what I like I said,
Speaker 4: It's incredibly volatile just because of who invests in it.
Speaker 4: You've got some very very large, major players, like you
Speaker 4: saw this guy who's connected and knows when things are
Speaker 4: going down, and then you've got a bunch of other
Speaker 4: people that are just trying to, you know, have it
Speaker 4: go to the moon. So they're just investing what they
Speaker 4: can when they can, and they'll be forced to abandon
Speaker 4: their positions.
Speaker 3: Well, it's like the original stock market crash and the
Speaker 3: guy says, one guy, forget who it was, it said
Speaker 3: it say, near the top of the market had been
Speaker 3: reached when the shoeshine boys were talking about stock tips
Speaker 3: with each other. Goes When it gets that far into retail,
Speaker 3: then it's time to get out, you know, because there's
Speaker 3: always been an inside game.
Speaker 4: Ah, so we've got too many suckers in the market.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, it's the last fool.
Speaker 4: So there's that old saying. You know, if you can't
Speaker 4: tell who the sucker at the table, is it you.
Speaker 4: I've never been able to identify the sucker, so I'm
Speaker 4: fairly confident it's always been me.
Speaker 3: That's my experience, Bulldog.
Speaker 4: If silver goes up, everything silver is used in goes
Speaker 4: up as well, or they can't get silver for production
Speaker 4: of everything, manufacturing will have buyer competition on silver. Wally Walrus.
Speaker 4: When all those fails, they take us to war. That's right, yeah,
Speaker 4: Guard Goldsmith. By the way, that Boston radio host calling
Speaker 4: Trump the peace president, oh Man Baston, what a peace
Speaker 4: president he is.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it just expells it with an eye as I.
Speaker 4: Say, bulldog, what O the government becomes a big buyer
Speaker 4: of silver along with manufacturing possibility possibility Russia.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, silver is used extensively in solar panels and
Speaker 3: some other things like that as well. Yeah, it's like
Speaker 3: the copper stuff that they are in the UK. There's
Speaker 3: so much copper theft of these charging cables that it's
Speaker 3: destroying the charging infrastructure, what little of it there was.
Speaker 4: Who knew that crackheads would be our last line of defense?
Speaker 3: Yeah, And the thing says that it's got that it's
Speaker 3: online and there are things there, But then you get
Speaker 3: there and there's no cable because somebody cut it off
Speaker 3: to sell the copper that's there, So they want the
Speaker 3: copper strands and you're stranded.
Speaker 4: Five ninety five bulld or read that one Bitcoin is
Speaker 4: just a techno Ponzi scheme tunnel lord one three three seven.
Speaker 4: The coin bros should use some of their earnings and
Speaker 4: reinvest them into far more stable markets. That does sound
Speaker 4: like good advice. Sounds like good advice to me. You
Speaker 4: somehow make it to the moon on bitcoin or one
Speaker 4: of these alt coins and get out and put it
Speaker 4: in something that is not going to just crash for
Speaker 4: no reason.
Speaker 3: And Tony can help you do that without a fee.
Speaker 3: Exactly takes a bitcoin, it turns it into the gold.
Speaker 4: David gold Nibberu twenty twenty nine, nineteen twenty nine, Will
Speaker 4: apperiod time of plenty compared to Trump's big beautiful economic implosion, Yeah,
Speaker 4: I certainly hope not. Audi Mr R. Trump is trying
Speaker 4: to turn country into perpetually military occupied American gaza.
Speaker 3: Yes, I'm gonna talk about that coming up next.
Speaker 4: And of course, going back to Nibrew, no matter what happens,
Speaker 4: God is in control of everything, so more than gold,
Speaker 4: more than silver, more than any investment, whether it's bullets
Speaker 4: or food. You can trust in him always. He will
Speaker 4: always be there, the real Octo Spook. And of course
Speaker 4: that I mean the Gospel Jesus Christ. He is who
Speaker 4: you need in your life, not just a general God,
Speaker 4: the real octavespo.
Speaker 3: China, not just the man upstairs.
Speaker 4: I'm a big believer in the man upstairs. Isn't that
Speaker 4: the man upstairs, absolutely meaningless. China is the largest mining
Speaker 4: slash producer of gold in the world. China is a
Speaker 4: clear winner here, has fifteen percent of all gold ever
Speaker 4: mined in the world and increasing every day. Trump's tears
Speaker 4: spankrupting Americans just doesn't seem a good response against China.
Speaker 3: No, just like Biden weaponizing the financial system against Russia,
Speaker 3: confiscating their assets that they had parked in the financial
Speaker 3: system was a self inflicted wound that could be fatal
Speaker 3: for the economic system real not just because of Russia,
Speaker 3: but because everybody could see they can't trust this financial
Speaker 3: system that's been politicized and weaponized.
Speaker 4: Niburu twenty twenty nine. Putin doesn't have to worry about
Speaker 4: taking on Marx America directly. Trump will have sabotaged the
Speaker 4: nation long before that day arrives. Yeah, bulldog, Oh my god,
Speaker 4: it this is going to pop with bricks. It's the
Speaker 4: market is incredibly unstable and all it needs is just
Speaker 4: a little push one way or the other. Sylvia nineteen.
Speaker 4: Catherine Austin Fitz said crypto slash captured stable coin is
Speaker 4: pump and dump. I agree, it's another good way to
Speaker 4: get the last of your money out of you. Yeah,
Speaker 4: Christian cons social conser.
Speaker 3: I'm going to bind anything that look because and Trump
Speaker 3: are pushing it.
Speaker 4: Not on my watch, Christian constitutional conservative. I accuse Trump
Speaker 4: of insider trading. And Friday was a classic example. Markets
Speaker 4: hit all time highs and then he announced his hair
Speaker 4: brain tears, markets plummeted, chev Ken three more years of
Speaker 4: destruction from Trump to go, oh boy, buckle your seat belts,
Speaker 4: bulldog the fortune. Five hundred companies are all maxed out
Speaker 4: in debt. The stockbook values are near zero. Real Jason Barker,
Speaker 4: the richest of the rich know what's coming and are
Speaker 4: often driving it. The real octose book. Here in Walmart,
Speaker 4: if you buy booze, everyone with you has to show
Speaker 4: ID Booze might be a great investment too. Walmart is
Speaker 4: now a branch of the ATF.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 4: You better start stocking up on ever Clear. Also, it
Speaker 4: can be used to disinfect wounds. If it comes down
Speaker 4: to it. Pair ods got stuck in retro video games,
Speaker 4: and that's right, invest in Pokemon. Buy Pokemon now. Nintendo
Speaker 4: only goes up. It's going to the moon.
Speaker 5: It is amazing that their prices are skyrocketing when you
Speaker 5: would think that collector's items would crash.
Speaker 4: I think it's partially to do with how utterly ridiculous
Speaker 4: our society has become and how out of touch a
Speaker 4: lot of people are. They We've lived in a time
Speaker 4: of plenty for so long that they don't think.
Speaker 3: That we've memo.
Speaker 4: Yeah, they don't think it can go bad. So they're
Speaker 4: sitting there. Oh, you know what's really going to hold
Speaker 4: its value? My char is in a time of plenty.
Speaker 4: In a time of excess, yes, your charizard might continue
Speaker 4: to hold it's you know, five ten thousand dollars value.
Speaker 4: If the market collapses, no one is going to be
Speaker 4: buying your charizard.
Speaker 3: Yeah, or your baseball cards or whatever. It is crazy.
Speaker 4: My tulip bulbs.
Speaker 3: I wonder if you could eat those tulip bubs. So, yeah,
Speaker 3: somebody did. Probably. Well, there's a little bit of hope
Speaker 3: in all of this. Marjorie Taylor Green is now torching
Speaker 3: Trump's tariffs and his corruption at the same time. So
Speaker 3: she has seen the light, and good for her. She's
Speaker 3: developing a spine and getting integrity here, just like Thomas Massey.
Speaker 3: She joined. Thomas Massey has been very outspoken about this.
Speaker 3: Epstein stuff, But she said this shouldn't be about helping
Speaker 3: your crypto donors. That's exactly what he has made it.
Speaker 3: So she said that these are all attempts to enrich
Speaker 3: his crypto donors. She said this during a recent conversation
Speaker 3: with comedian Tim Dillon. And I'm talking to major manufacturing
Speaker 3: companies that are saying, we support the president, we support
Speaker 3: what he's trying, his long term goals, but we have
Speaker 3: a problem with these tariffs. Let me just say that
Speaker 3: the devil's not just in the details. The devil is
Speaker 3: in the way that you achieve your goals. Right. The
Speaker 3: end does not justify the means. So we can agree
Speaker 3: with Trump on the end, and we can adamantly and
Speaker 3: must adamantly oppose the means that he's trying to accomplish
Speaker 3: with all of these things, whether you're talking about the
Speaker 3: border and immigration flood, or whether you're talking about the
Speaker 3: outflow of wealth and manufacturing out of this country in
Speaker 3: the first place, we don't want to centrally planned economy.
Speaker 3: And if we want to centrally planned economy, he hate
Speaker 3: the guy to do it. He bankrupted half a dozen casinos,
Speaker 3: so he's a lucky loser. As the book said, and
Speaker 3: they got him so angry that he sued him for
Speaker 3: fifteen billion dollars because it was spot on with the truth.
Speaker 3: She goes on to say, Marjorie Tayler Green says, it
Speaker 3: shouldn't be about helping your crypto donors or your AI donors,
Speaker 3: or welcoming in these people that hated you and spent
Speaker 3: money trying to beat you. But all of a sudden,
Speaker 3: you're excited to come there, excited to come to the
Speaker 3: news new Rose Garden patio. That should not be the focus. Well,
Speaker 3: she's spot on it. She's the focus is new ballroom
Speaker 3: in the Rose Garden patio. Right, even when somebody asking
Speaker 3: about Charlie Cook, Well, yeah, that's really bad. But hey,
Speaker 3: I tell you about my new ballroom plans that are.
Speaker 4: Here, very very said, what's un said? My ballroom the
Speaker 4: best ballroom gonna be great.
Speaker 3: She said. The focus should be on the people that
Speaker 3: showed up at the rallies, who stood there for eighteen
Speaker 3: hours trying to get in in the rain, in the cold,
Speaker 3: in the one hundred degree heat. For those people, those
Speaker 3: are the ones that I care about. Those are the
Speaker 3: ones that for not only President Trump, but for every
Speaker 3: single Republican and gave us power. I don't think those
Speaker 3: people are being served. Well, She's exactly right. These are
Speaker 3: the kind of people who were who had warrants served
Speaker 3: on them after the first Trump term. As I've said
Speaker 3: for all, that was the biggest betrayal of his own supporters,
Speaker 3: with Alex Jones to stop the steal when his Save
Speaker 3: America grift where he made two nd fifty million dollars
Speaker 3: then set these people up. And he just was tweeting
Speaker 3: about this and says there has to be some kind
Speaker 3: of a payback for this, and people said, wait a minute,
Speaker 3: you realize you were the president when that happened. He's
Speaker 3: talking about Biden as if Biden pulled off January sixth,
Speaker 3: Biden pulled off the punishment that was clearly coming. And
Speaker 3: not to say that any of it was justified, but
Speaker 3: Trump left his own supporters. Not only did he lure
Speaker 3: them in, fleeced them of their money, and then lure
Speaker 3: them into this to this setup, but he left them
Speaker 3: to be punished by Biden, refusing to pardon them before
Speaker 3: he left. He was too busy pardoning the crooks associated
Speaker 3: with the Jared Kushner's family. And so yeah, she's very
Speaker 3: strong her statements against it, and she's one hundred percent right.
Speaker 3: We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we'll
Speaker 3: be right back.
Speaker 6: Unlike most revolutions, whether people rise against the real economic oppression,
Speaker 6: in our case, here in Boston, we are fighting for
Speaker 6: purely an abstract principle. Here it is, however, not nearly
Speaker 6: so abstract as a young gentleman supposes. The issue involved
Speaker 6: here is one of monopolies. Today, the British government will
Speaker 6: monopolize the sale of tea in our country. Tomorrow it
Speaker 6: will be something.
Speaker 2: Else, liberty. It's your move. You're listening to the David
Speaker 2: Knight Show.
Speaker 7: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelensky. I'm so tired of wearing
Speaker 7: these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
Speaker 7: all the billions skimmed off America, I could dress better.
Speaker 7: And I could if only David Knight would send me
Speaker 7: one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
Speaker 7: black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But
Speaker 7: he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
Speaker 7: American suckers can buy me some at the Davidknightshow dot com.
Speaker 7: You should be able to buy me several hundred Those
Speaker 7: amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful, I'd wear
Speaker 7: something other than green military cosplay to my various galas
Speaker 7: and social events. If you want to save on shipping,
Speaker 7: just put it in the next package of bombs and
Speaker 7: missiles coming from the USA.
Speaker 8: Here news now at apsradionews dot com, or get the
Speaker 8: APS radio app and never miss another story.
Speaker 3: Well, as I said at the beginning of the program,
Speaker 3: one of the things that concerns me is that Trump supporters,
Speaker 3: and I know it's Trump supporters of its trump bots,
Speaker 3: but they're using open a Eyes Sora to generate AI
Speaker 3: videos of soldiers salting protesters because they want this. And again,
Speaker 3: I don't know how much of this as influencers. I
Speaker 3: don't know how much of this is mob mentality, and
Speaker 3: how much of it are bots that are controlled by
Speaker 3: the Trump people. But it thoroughly disgusted me. I'm going
Speaker 3: to show you one of these things. Videos created using
Speaker 3: open ayes Sora to depict soldiers assaulting protesters, fueling a
Speaker 3: narrative of widespread violence. However, the violent crime in the
Speaker 3: US is at its lowest in decades, and contradiction of
Speaker 3: this narrative. So here's what it looks like. This is
Speaker 3: what I call it. Instead of martial law, I call
Speaker 3: it MAGA law because MAGA doesn't have any respectful law
Speaker 3: for constitution. They know and care as little about the
Speaker 3: law and constitution do process as they know and care
Speaker 3: about politics and about Trump's personal life. So here's the
Speaker 3: kind of garbage AI slop these people are putting out
Speaker 3: to cheer.
Speaker 9: No cheerse okay, so no cheers, you hear me?
Speaker 4: Okay, so no cheers.
Speaker 6: I can't see I now thats out now z okay,
Speaker 6: crack it up, check it out.
Speaker 3: Yeah. And these people reply and say that was beautiful.
Speaker 3: You think that's beautiful, wait till they do it to you,
Speaker 3: and before you ask, I voted for this. That's why
Speaker 3: I pose MAGA. I have absolutely nothing to say to
Speaker 3: these people. They are clueless, useful idiots to take Trump's
Speaker 3: word for it. America cities or in rains, forcing him
Speaker 3: to deploy federal troops to Portland, d C. And Memphis.
Speaker 3: But no one seems to be able to find any
Speaker 3: real evidence of the mass riots and the anarchistic violence
Speaker 3: that Trump and his supporters insist is destroying a nation.
Speaker 3: Luckily for them, that problem is easily solved with a
Speaker 3: little help from AI. So hey, if it's not there
Speaker 3: for real, you can just create a fantasy world to
Speaker 3: support what Trump is saying. So this was first flag
Speaker 3: by Gizmoto, which reported a concerning rise in AI generated
Speaker 3: pro Trump propaganda since release of Open Ais Sora two,
Speaker 3: which is capable of spinning out short, photorealistic clips along
Speaker 3: with sound as well as you noticed. Gizmoto notes how
Speaker 3: one clip showing a protester harassing a US National guardsman
Speaker 3: before getting pepper sprayed went viral on Instagram, notching nearly
Speaker 3: one and a half million likes one and a half million likes.
Speaker 3: I detest that. I absolutely detest that in the first place.
Speaker 3: I don't care what the person is saying. You know,
Speaker 3: they have them saying something. You know that was non shows,
Speaker 3: no cheese or something. What was it, no caeso, no keso,
Speaker 3: no cheese or something. Yeah, anyway, but whatever they're saying
Speaker 3: to that National guardsman, that does not give him the
Speaker 3: right to pep persuade them in the face. When you
Speaker 3: support that, then what you're saying is I don't like
Speaker 3: your speech. Your speech is hateful. Your speech is violence,
Speaker 3: and the MAGA people are no different from the left folks.
Speaker 3: We don't want to have anything to do with either
Speaker 3: of those sides. They are a mirror image of each other.
Speaker 3: They come at it from different directions. It's like the
Speaker 3: Nazi fascists versus the Soviet communists. You don't want to
Speaker 3: be on either side. They're both horrible and they're just
Speaker 3: coming at it with a different justification. So had one
Speaker 3: and a half million likes, forty million views. Can you
Speaker 3: imagine that? Liking that? And the comments are making it clear?
Speaker 3: Best video I saw today. Let's see more of these
Speaker 3: gumbags being taken down. I love a feel good video
Speaker 3: like this. Another one, another poster on x uploaded an
Speaker 3: AI generated video montage of various protesters hollowing, hollering in
Speaker 3: the police officers faces, no case so no chiefs, which
Speaker 3: I just showed you there and again I voted for this,
Speaker 3: said one of them. Well I saw that and that
Speaker 3: disgusted me. So here is my take on all this
Speaker 3: stuff if I can find it. Let's see here it is.
Speaker 3: There's trumps on meme sees himself as Robert Wall in
Speaker 3: the Apocalypse.
Speaker 4: Now beautiful friend.
Speaker 3: This is the.
Speaker 4: Mily.
Speaker 3: Yeah, burned the constitution, burned everything else.
Speaker 2: Of no sense.
Speaker 1: No ross.
Speaker 3: Yeah, this is what Trump wants. That was this meme
Speaker 3: that started.
Speaker 10: Okay, I said, cracis and we're going to straighten out
Speaker 10: one by what they're saying.
Speaker 3: You're trying to take over the republic.
Speaker 10: And this is going to be a major part for
Speaker 10: some of the people in this room. That's a war too,
Speaker 10: It's a war from within. I told people we should
Speaker 10: use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for
Speaker 10: our military.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's what the military is going to look like
Speaker 3: right there.
Speaker 5: And you that's what.
Speaker 9: So sad, just.
Speaker 1: Also stranger.
Speaker 4: Better just read.
Speaker 3: Chicken goats that must be gates.
Speaker 10: That's farm.
Speaker 4: Gitic modification has gone wild.
Speaker 3: Yeah, chicken goats. Now do they lay eggs or give
Speaker 3: wool or both? How about that? So they're drumming up
Speaker 3: consent and they've got an army of people using AI
Speaker 3: to drum this up. And people love that. There's a
Speaker 3: red meat to them. So a campaign that Trump happily
Speaker 3: calls a war a war within. This is from Mediaite,
Speaker 3: which is left wing in opposition to Trump. The Quiet Coup.
Speaker 3: How Trump is undermining democracy from within. America is not
Speaker 3: drifting towards authoritarianism. It has already arrived, quietly, bureaucratically, almost politely.
Speaker 3: And it's what the Trump supporters want. It's what they
Speaker 3: voted for. It really is what they voted for. After
Speaker 3: twenty twenty, don't tell me that the people who voted
Speaker 3: for Trump, the influencers who supported him, didn't want this,
Speaker 3: because he did it already. The crowd's a chance, the
Speaker 3: carnival agrievance that was just Act one, Act two. The
Speaker 3: show has moved backstage and the footlights are off, the
Speaker 3: machinery homes, and Trump, who once ruled by impulse, now
Speaker 3: governs through the design. Well, the question is, we're going
Speaker 3: to talk about this in just a second. Whose design
Speaker 3: is it his? Is it Peter Teels, is it Curtis Jarvin?
Speaker 3: Is it the technocracy's design or the un He's learned
Speaker 3: how to run it. After two terms of cultural conditioning,
Speaker 3: the American public has been anesthetized by the permanent adrenaline
Speaker 3: of outrage. Every assault on legal norms and constitutional norms
Speaker 3: lands as deja vus. Now he writes things like democratic norms.
Speaker 3: America is not a democracy. It's a republic. It's a
Speaker 3: constitutional republic with rules of law. That's what's being attacked here.
Speaker 3: He's not doing anything with the elections. What's being attacked
Speaker 3: as the constitution, folks. That's what the left doesn't see.
Speaker 3: What once felt like a scandal now feels like weather
Speaker 3: because it just keeps coming. The central project of Trump's
Speaker 3: second term is not ideological, but architectural, the systematic capture
Speaker 3: of the federal government. Very much like what FDR did
Speaker 3: and the last fourth turning, it's exactly what he's doing.
Speaker 3: And yet the difference is as much as FDR changed things,
Speaker 3: he had opposition within his own party saying, we agree
Speaker 3: with where you want to go, but the way you're
Speaker 3: doing it we don't support. Because remember this is back
Speaker 3: at a time when if they wanted to prohibit something
Speaker 3: like alcohol, they had enough respect for the Constitution of
Speaker 3: the rule of law that they would pass the constitutional Men,
Speaker 3: no such thing exists anymore. Nobody cares about the rule
Speaker 3: of law. So Russvoight, the O and B director, is
Speaker 3: basically the chief mechanic of this new order. He invoked
Speaker 3: emergency powers to lay off thousands of civil servants. They're
Speaker 3: very friendly and media eye towards the bureaucrats. Entire agencies
Speaker 3: were hollowed out under the pretense of fiscal discipline, inspectors,
Speaker 3: general ethics officers, policy staffers, those dull, indispensable sentinels of
Speaker 3: accountability were shown the door. I don't see them as
Speaker 3: sentinels of accountability. But what I think is dangerous here,
Speaker 3: and I said this when Elon Musk was using DOGE
Speaker 3: to fire people and replace them with AI is what
Speaker 3: they're removing is the human factor. And we move the
Speaker 3: human factor, and you automate the machinery of this. You
Speaker 3: are maximizing governance. You may be minimizing human head count
Speaker 3: and government, and you may be getting a lot of
Speaker 3: get rid of a lot of people that the rest
Speaker 3: of us don't like the DMV or the federal equivalents
Speaker 3: of it in so many different areas of our life.
Speaker 3: But you're still at some level dealing with humans. And
Speaker 3: you may find somebody who has sympathy for what is
Speaker 3: happening to you, what they're doing to you, and they
Speaker 3: may also blow the whistle when they see things that
Speaker 3: are being done wrong that is not going to happen
Speaker 3: once they automate it. With AI. That's the key issue here,
Speaker 3: that's total governance, and it removes the human factor. It's
Speaker 3: the same reason that we talk about autonomous killing machines. Right.
Speaker 3: We can have these undeclared, unjustified wars all the time,
Speaker 3: but what happens is when you've got real soldiers out there,
Speaker 3: sometimes they'll come back and they'll tell you what's really
Speaker 3: going on. Some of them will, and that can be
Speaker 3: used to turn things around, or maybe they won't follow
Speaker 3: the orders that they are given. That's not the case
Speaker 3: when you've got robotic machines that are going to be
Speaker 3: doing the killing. And that's not going to be the
Speaker 3: case when you've got robotic machines that are going to
Speaker 3: be doing the bureaucratic functions that the federal government doesn't
Speaker 3: have any authority for in the first place. So the
Speaker 3: Project twenty twenty five's design was to replace neutral expertise
Speaker 3: with partisan obedience. Rights media eye. Well, I disagree. I
Speaker 3: don't think that you know, the bureaucracy was expertise they
Speaker 3: were for that matter, or neutral. Yeah, it was. It
Speaker 3: was neutral to them because they were on the same side.
Speaker 3: But I didn't see expertise at all in that but
Speaker 3: it is the demolition He got this right, the demolition
Speaker 3: of the constitutional balance between Congress and the executive, between
Speaker 3: law and loyalty. Power now emanates not from deliberation but
Speaker 3: from decree. And I've said this myself from the very beginning.
Speaker 3: This is about setting up an autocracy, a dictatorship. He
Speaker 3: declares the emergency and then declares, now that it's an emergency,
Speaker 3: I can do whatever I want. It's just a little
Speaker 3: two step formality there. That's nonsense. Trump's deployment of federal
Speaker 3: forces in cities like Washington, Chicago, and Portland under the
Speaker 3: fiction of crime emergencies has normalized the site of domestic militarization.
Speaker 3: That's a key part of this. This is the just
Speaker 3: like you did with the lockdown stuff, right, This is
Speaker 3: normalizing people for that, just like you did with the
Speaker 3: stimulus checks that was normalizing ubi. This is normalizing the
Speaker 3: military on the streets. That is Trump's purpose. As a
Speaker 3: Trump precedent, courts hesitate, Congress sputters, and the White House
Speaker 3: learns a lesson that if you act as though you
Speaker 3: have the authority, eventually you do. You can fake the
Speaker 3: authority until you make the authority. None of this looks
Speaker 3: like a coup, it looks like a like administration. And
Speaker 3: that's what makes it so effective. The press, the courts,
Speaker 3: elections are still there where their cumulative weight feels diminished,
Speaker 3: like background institutions orbiting a single gravitational center. You don't
Speaker 3: need to destroy a democracy to control it. You only
Speaker 3: need to occupy it from within. Keep the noise loud,
Speaker 3: keep the lights bright, and the public too weary to
Speaker 3: parse the details. And you keep a mob of fanatical
Speaker 3: supporters there. You know, this is Maga, is his brown
Speaker 3: shirts that are out there keeping people in line, keeping
Speaker 3: the politicians in line. They're totally afraid of this guy.
Speaker 3: That's what's really concerning. Governance becomes spectacle, and spectacle becomes governance,
Speaker 3: and the population learns to confuse fatigue with normalcy, and
Speaker 3: to what end. Some may say that this is merely
Speaker 3: a political policy disagreement, that Trump favors smaller government, fewer regulations,
Speaker 3: and a market friendly redistribution of resources. But the danger
Speaker 3: is not that the administration pursues conservative goals. It is
Speaker 3: how these policies are implemented through emergency powers, through bureaucratic purges,
Speaker 3: and through centralized control. Power is being wielded to consolidate
Speaker 3: power and wealth, to bypass oversight, and to weaken the
Speaker 3: structural checks that make the American Republic resilient. And that's
Speaker 3: what Marjorie Taylor Green was saying. So this shouldn't be
Speaker 3: run for the benefit of your donors. And that's exactly
Speaker 3: what it's about. It's about consolidating power for Trump and
Speaker 3: consolidating wealth for Trump and his donors. This is destabilization.
Speaker 3: It is weaponizing government to serve extreme wealth accumulation. The
Speaker 3: logical consequences of such systemic enrichment is unrest and if
Speaker 3: left unchecked, it may provoke revolutionary pressures. The stakes are
Speaker 3: nothing less than the preservation of the republic and the
Speaker 3: rule of law. By weakening the civil service, militarizing urban centers,
Speaker 3: and consolidating power within the executive branch, Trump is laying
Speaker 3: the groundwork for a presidency that is not merely strong,
Speaker 3: but a total fusion of state, party, and personal enrichment.
Speaker 3: The public's focus on daily scandals obscure the more insidious
Speaker 3: threats to democracy unfolding behind the scenes. And yes, Trump
Speaker 3: is great at providing one scandal after the other, isn't he.
Speaker 3: David Carr once wrote that journalism's purpose was to quote
Speaker 3: name the thing. Well the thing is now authoritarianism, cloak
Speaker 3: to legality, spectacle and distraction. And while the noise keeps rolling,
Speaker 3: the country risks awakening too late to the magnitude of
Speaker 3: what has been quietly stolen. And we know what is
Speaker 3: being stolen even now. Karl Rove comes in, and of
Speaker 3: course he was George W. Bush's political analyst, That's why
Speaker 3: he looked at this. So he looks at the polls,
Speaker 3: and he said over the weekend on Fox News, he
Speaker 3: said that this latest National Guard gambit as bad policies,
Speaker 3: that it is a loser. He said. He warned Trump
Speaker 3: that his effort to deploy the National Guard to Portland
Speaker 3: Chicago is bad politics. During appearance on the Journal Editorial
Speaker 3: Report on Saturday, Wall Street journalist Paul Gigo who was
Speaker 3: interviewing him, and so he asked Rove about this. He said,
Speaker 3: if you take a look at the Reuters poll, fifty
Speaker 3: eight percent of those surveyed said they believe that you
Speaker 3: should send troops only for external threats. However, the Republicans
Speaker 3: are fifty one percent, Democrats seventy two percent, and independence
Speaker 3: fifty three percent. But if you look deeper, there's another question,
Speaker 3: which was should the president send troops even if a
Speaker 3: governor objects. That was thirty seven percent yes, forty eight
Speaker 3: percent no, And it was seventy to eighty, seventy to
Speaker 3: eighteen among Republicans, it was thirteen to seventy nine among Democrats,
Speaker 3: and twenty eight to fifty among independents. So we don't
Speaker 3: like him. We believe that he shouldn't deploy if a
Speaker 3: governor objects. Though the partisanship seems starts to be felt.
Speaker 3: Republicans say yeah, override the governor. Democrats say no, and
Speaker 3: independence tend decide with the Democrat voters and say no.
Speaker 3: I don't think that should happen. Roe said this, Ultimately,
Speaker 3: I think will tend to be a loser if the
Speaker 3: question is should the president do this or should he
Speaker 3: have done it. On the other hand, it might get
Speaker 3: him a slight improvement among the people saying who are
Speaker 3: concerned about crime and saying, well, at least he's taking action.
Speaker 3: But overall, I think this is going to end up
Speaker 3: being a loser for the president. I'm not so sure
Speaker 3: that he's got that right, because, as I said, you know,
Speaker 3: I think assuming that stuff is coming from some people
Speaker 3: in his base. I would assume that it's probably coming
Speaker 3: from his meme factory. You know that the Republicans and
Speaker 3: the people around Trump are working on that very hard,
Speaker 3: and I think for we're seeing a lot of things
Speaker 3: like that cheering police brutality, and that is that video.
Speaker 3: There was police brutality. Regardless of what you say to
Speaker 3: the police, you have a right to peacefully redress your
Speaker 3: grievances and they don't have a right to retaliate to you.
Speaker 3: That is the wrong thing for the government to do.
Speaker 3: On January sixth, that's what happened. A lot of people said, well,
Speaker 3: the police kicked this off. We were having a protest
Speaker 3: and they started attacking people. Yeah, they understood it when
Speaker 3: it happened to them, But only when it happens to
Speaker 3: them do they understand it. They don't understand the principle involved,
Speaker 3: because immediately they turn around and support this because regardless
Speaker 3: of who created that, you had one and a half
Speaker 3: million people who liked that. He's making the case, and
Speaker 3: certainly his lawyers are in court that these National Guard
Speaker 3: troops are there to protect federal buildings and to protect
Speaker 3: the ICE agents that are doing their job, because you've
Speaker 3: the governor and the mayor, the governor of Illinois, the
Speaker 3: mayor of Chicago saying we're not going to cooperate with Ice.
Speaker 3: So he says, I mean, there's a kind of logic
Speaker 3: to what he's doing to try to protect these agents.
Speaker 3: That's Paul Gigo saying that to Rogue. Rogue called rogue,
Speaker 3: called him Carl Rogue for so long anyway. So but
Speaker 3: the reality is is that the principle that local officials
Speaker 3: do not have to cooperate with the federal government has
Speaker 3: been endorsed by the Supreme Court. Whether or not they
Speaker 3: endorsed it or not, that is constitutional. We have a
Speaker 3: separation of powers. And what the Trump administration is now
Speaker 3: doing is treating that established principle of non cooperation, that
Speaker 3: principle of nullification, which are really part of the Tenth Amendment.
Speaker 3: The Trump administration is now treating that as if that
Speaker 3: were an insurrection, as if that were somehow secession or something.
Speaker 3: So always in the past we said, yeah, like Marjorie
Speaker 3: Tyler Green said, I think we needed a national divorce.
Speaker 3: I said, well, the problem is you're married to an
Speaker 3: abusive husband the federal government, and so in the past,
Speaker 3: if you wanted to declare that you are independent and
Speaker 3: have a divorce, you are inviting attack from the federal government.
Speaker 3: Now Trump has moved the needle so that if you
Speaker 3: just don't obey this abusive husband and everything, he's got
Speaker 3: a right to beat you. That's the reality of this.
Speaker 3: And so Rove says, well, look, he has the authority
Speaker 3: to deploy the National Guard to protect federal facilities. And
Speaker 3: I think the public, though, is going to look at
Speaker 3: this and make a decision. And so whether or not
Speaker 3: what they're seeing during the summer of twenty twenty and
Speaker 3: riots in Portland, nightly attacks on the federal courthouse, or
Speaker 3: is this going to be you know, protesters outside of
Speaker 3: facility in suburban Chicago. Let me just say, you know,
Speaker 3: he says, all right, so we know what happened in
Speaker 3: twenty twenty. There were a lot of riots. Now Left
Speaker 3: called it mostly peaceful, but they're burning stuff up. It
Speaker 3: was really out of control, and a lot of people
Speaker 3: were calling on Trump to do something about it then
Speaker 3: and he did nothing. So now we have something that
Speaker 3: is much much. There's nothing at all going on like that.
Speaker 3: This is just the usual stuff in Chicago or these
Speaker 3: big cities, usual crime, and that people there are content
Speaker 3: to live with because they don't want to change the
Speaker 3: government there or move out. So that is this has
Speaker 3: been the status quo for quite some time. It's not
Speaker 3: an emergency. Nothing has changed, and you don't have the
Speaker 3: kind of riots that we did in the summer of
Speaker 3: twenty twenty when Trump did nothing. So how could he
Speaker 3: argue that this is an emergency that requires the federal
Speaker 3: government to do something about it. His own experiences on
Speaker 3: administration before this argues against his own actions that he's
Speaker 3: doing here. So he says, if it heats up, yeah,
Speaker 3: the President's going to look better. But if it doesn't
Speaker 3: heat up, if it really is just sort of meeting
Speaker 3: the needs of the protecting the federal facilities, I'm not
Speaker 3: certain that that's going to work to his advantage. We
Speaker 3: saw this a little bit in Portland where the President
Speaker 3: was asked about and he said, well, you know, I
Speaker 3: am hearing that there are fires and riots and lots
Speaker 3: of violence every night. I don't know where he's getting that,
Speaker 3: because that's not what we're seeing on Portland TV. Maybe
Speaker 3: he's looking at these the soro to AI stuff that
Speaker 3: people are creating maybe that's the reality.
Speaker 4: Trump a NonStop diet of fake videos.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so a reason is looking at the legality of
Speaker 3: this Insurrection Act regardless of whether or not. They kind
Speaker 3: of skip over the fundamental question as to whether or
Speaker 3: not that's constitutional, but they just assume that that's a
Speaker 3: legitimate thing. Even if it were a legitimate thing, Trump
Speaker 3: is using it illegitimately. That's how far down the rabbit
Speaker 3: hole we've gone down the drain. I should say he
Speaker 3: can resort to an alarmingly broad statue that gives him
Speaker 3: more discretion even if the courts tried to force limits
Speaker 3: on what he's doing with the military deployment. On Thursday,
Speaker 3: a federal judge temporarily blocked Trump's deployment and National Guard
Speaker 3: troops in Chicago, saying there's no credible evidence that conditions
Speaker 3: there meet the terms of the statute on which he
Speaker 3: was relying. That decision came less than a week after
Speaker 3: another federal judge issued a temporary restraining order against a
Speaker 3: similar deployment in Portland. Meanwhile, at a hearing on Thursday
Speaker 3: in the latter case, the panel on the US Court
Speaker 3: of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court seemed inclined to
Speaker 3: allow the Portland deployment. That's not good. That's especially not
Speaker 3: good because this is the Ninth Circuit Court. They typically
Speaker 3: are on the left, and of course the politicized. It's
Speaker 3: not just their perspective on things. The law he is invoking,
Speaker 3: which is the US Code one two four six, so
Speaker 3: as the President may call into federal service members and
Speaker 3: units of the National Guard of any state in response
Speaker 3: to a foreign invasion, an actual or incipient rebellion against
Speaker 3: the federal government, or conditions in which he is unable
Speaker 3: to enforce federal law with regular forces. Trump says that
Speaker 3: those last two conditions exist in Portland and in Chicago.
Speaker 3: But if the courts get in Trump's way, he can
Speaker 3: always resort to the alarmingly broad Insurrection Act. Again, it's
Speaker 3: an act. It's not any act or laws that are
Speaker 3: put in by the by the Congress can be in
Speaker 3: violation of the Constitution, and I think it is in
Speaker 3: violation of the Tenth Amendment. It gives him more discretion
Speaker 3: to deploy the military for law enforcement purposes. Trump says
Speaker 3: the courts have no role at all in reviewing his determination.
Speaker 3: That would leave him free to deploy the National guard
Speaker 3: wherever and whenever he likes, regardless of the constraints opposed
Speaker 3: by Congress. I remember when al Gore made the state
Speaker 3: there's no controlling legal authority here, and that was borderline
Speaker 3: taken out of context, but it really was what he believed.
Speaker 3: But this is literally what Trump is saying over and
Speaker 3: over again. I can do whatever I want. You have
Speaker 3: no authority. I'm the only one with any authority right.
Speaker 3: Congress doesn't have any authority, the courts don't have any authority,
Speaker 3: and the Constitution has no authority for Trump. So the
Speaker 3: nine Circuit Court rejected the argument that his use of
Speaker 3: Section one two four oh six is completely insulated from
Speaker 3: judicial review. However, when this came up before in terms
Speaker 3: of the LA deployment, the court kind of said, well,
Speaker 3: we still have oversight, but we're not going to fight
Speaker 3: you on this. So they capitulated to him to avoid
Speaker 3: a fight. And so it kind of shows you that
Speaker 3: nobody has the guts to stand up to him. That's
Speaker 3: why it's good for Marjorie Taylor Green that she would
Speaker 3: stand up to this guy. The courts are afraid of him.
Speaker 3: Certainly Mouse Johnson is afraid of him. A squeaker mouse.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's incredibly surprising for it to be Marjorie Taylor
Speaker 4: Green that's actually standing up and saying something. Just wou
Speaker 4: wouldn't have bet it, wouldn't have bet on that out?
Speaker 3: Well, I had just written her off as another sick event,
Speaker 3: because look, we all saw this in one form of
Speaker 3: the other five years ago. In twenty twenty, twenty twenty,
Speaker 3: all of this stuff was done all at once. That's
Speaker 3: why I say, anybody that would still support this guy,
Speaker 3: I just don't understand it at all. But good for her.
Speaker 3: She has had enough evidently of this. Yeah, after I
Speaker 3: don't know what it was that changed her mind, but.
Speaker 4: After twenty twenty, at minimum, you would have to look
Speaker 4: at it and go, Okay, he is so incompetent and
Speaker 4: stupid that he's a massive threat and cannot be put
Speaker 4: back into office.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Well that was the defense of a lot of
Speaker 3: these people. Well it wasn't Trump, it was a deep
Speaker 3: state and they were fooling, and it's like, so you
Speaker 3: want this guy back.
Speaker 4: Ah, good, a fool, just what we need.
Speaker 3: I said, you know, whether he's a fool or a tool,
Speaker 3: whether this is his idea tool of the technocrats, anyway.
Speaker 3: Applying the same test. Last Saturday, the US District Judge
Speaker 3: Karen Immergoot, who was appointed by Trump, concluded that Trump's
Speaker 3: assessment of the situation Portland was quote simply untethered to
Speaker 3: the facts. Yes, as usually his statements are from June
Speaker 3: eleventh through June twenty fifth. She acknowledged the protests at
Speaker 3: Portland's Immigration and Custom Enforcement building included violent behavior and
Speaker 3: required increased law enforcement presence, But since then, she noted,
Speaker 3: the protests of dwindled to twenty or fewer people and
Speaker 3: were generally peaceful, with only sporadic incidences of violence and
Speaker 3: disruptive behavior. But here's the key. It can be and
Speaker 3: should be addressed with normal law enforce It does not
Speaker 3: require the over the top response of sending in the military.
Speaker 3: By late September, when Trump decided the National Guard is
Speaker 3: necessary to protect war ravaged Portland, that's his terms from
Speaker 3: quote domestic terrorists unquote. The situation was categorically different from
Speaker 3: the violent incidents that the government had described in la
Speaker 3: she said. She noted that the government cited only four
Speaker 3: incidents of protesters clashing with federal officers in September, including
Speaker 3: the erection of a makeshift guillotine, flashlights shown into the
Speaker 3: eyes of drivers and the ice facility, and an online
Speaker 3: photograph of an unmarked ice vehicle. Again, this is the
Speaker 3: kind of manufactured hysteria that we saw from the Biden
Speaker 3: administration about January sixth. Instead of a guillotine, somebody put
Speaker 3: up a gallows with a hangman's new Senate And you
Speaker 3: know they use any pretense like this to escalate things.
Speaker 3: She said. While these incidents are inexcusable, they can be
Speaker 3: handled by regular law enforcement forces. She said, neither violence
Speaker 3: in a different state nor the more potential for future
Speaker 3: escalation can provide a colorable basis for invoking Section one
Speaker 3: two four oh six. That argument, she said, would render
Speaker 3: meaningless the statutes quote extraordinary requirements allowing the president to
Speaker 3: federalize one state's national guard based on events in a
Speaker 3: different state or mere speculation about future events. During the
Speaker 3: Ninth Circuit Courts hearing on Thursday, one judge was notably
Speaker 3: skeptical of her reasoning, He said, applying that test to
Speaker 3: the Civil War, he said, I'm not sure that even
Speaker 3: sure that President Lincoln would have been able to bring
Speaker 3: in forces when he did unless Lincoln acted immediately after
Speaker 3: the Confederate attack on Fort Sumter. Well, that would have
Speaker 3: been a good thing. Actually, if you go back and
Speaker 3: read Shelby foot History of the Civil War, and he
Speaker 3: spent twenty years on that, and he I think is
Speaker 3: by far and away the best analysis of the Civil War.
Speaker 3: But he said that it was a deliberate provocation to
Speaker 3: make sure that he had the justification. He didn't want
Speaker 3: to be seen as the aggressor, and so it was
Speaker 3: a deliberate provocation. He had probed a lot of different
Speaker 3: places to go in and try to provoke the people,
Speaker 3: the different states that had succeeded, and then he determined
Speaker 3: that South Carolina was the one that they were most
Speaker 3: likely to take a violent response to, so that's where
Speaker 3: he went.
Speaker 4: There's also the fact that just it was a win win.
Speaker 4: Either they do something about it and he gets justification,
Speaker 4: or he's able to build up enough troops there that,
Speaker 4: you know, maybe he becomes the aggressor. But at that
Speaker 4: point it's just a flat out I've got enough people
Speaker 4: here right now to conquer this area immediately.
Speaker 3: But I think it's interesting too that the judge goes
Speaker 3: back to the Civil War war and because that's what
Speaker 3: we're seeing here, So fourth turning. So what Trump is
Speaker 3: doing is structurally he's doing what FDR did in the
Speaker 3: last fourth turning, and then with a military aspect of this,
Speaker 3: he's doing what Lincoln did and the fourth turning before that,
Speaker 3: which you say, lands.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I was just gonna say, it's also odd that
Speaker 5: he would point to this as though it were an
Speaker 5: argument in favor, saying that if this law had been passed,
Speaker 5: the civil war wouldn't have happened. Still, that's an argument
Speaker 5: the law not to be passed.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right, Yeah, you argue would have been Okay,
Speaker 3: things have de escalated now, so we don't have to
Speaker 3: have a civil war. No, we want to have that
Speaker 3: civil war, right. So Immergoot also rejected Trump's assertion that
Speaker 3: he was facing a rebellion or the danger of a
Speaker 3: rebellion in Portland. So, yeah, it may not be it
Speaker 3: may not be this yet, but it's going to be that.
Speaker 3: And so I'm going to do this in anticipation of
Speaker 3: it becoming that. Here we have in test and testatory invasion,
Speaker 3: I guess, which is the way we fight our wars,
Speaker 3: isn't it. You know? It's like, well, they're not attacking
Speaker 3: us now, but they could, and if LUs could kill,
Speaker 3: it would be us instead of them. Right, So her
Speaker 3: analysis relied on Briar's historically informed understanding of the term rebellion.
Speaker 3: Brier said, or she said, First, a rebellion must not
Speaker 3: only be violent, but must also be armed. Second, a
Speaker 3: rebellion must be organized. Third, a rebellion must be open
Speaker 3: and avowed. And fourth, a rebellion must be against the
Speaker 3: government as a whole, often with the aim of overthrowing
Speaker 3: the government, rather than an opposition to a single law
Speaker 3: or issue. So, applying that definition, the Trump appointed Judge
Speaker 3: Immergot concluded that the protests Importanland were not a rebellion,
Speaker 3: did not pose a danger of a rebellion, especially in
Speaker 3: the days leading up to the federalization of sending in
Speaker 3: the troops. So another judge chafin, rather, this is not judge.
Speaker 3: Someone who's arguing the case told the Ninth Circuit panel
Speaker 3: that the appropriate definition of rebellion is an open, organized,
Speaker 3: armed resistance to an established government or an attempt to
Speaker 3: change the government or the leader, usually through violence. And
Speaker 3: so the Unitth Circuit Court, however, does not seem to
Speaker 3: be buying these arguments. On the same day that the
Speaker 3: Ninth Circuit considered the Portland deployment, a US District Judge
Speaker 3: April Perry, a Biden appointee, issued a temporary restraining order
Speaker 3: against the deployment in Illinois, Echoing Immergot who was appointed
Speaker 3: by Trump, Perry, who was appointed by Biden. So the
Speaker 3: Trump administration's perception of events quote unquote in the Chicago
Speaker 3: area is quote simply unreliable. She suggested that calling up
Speaker 3: the National Guard would quote only add fuel to the
Speaker 3: fire the defendants themselves have started. Well, that's what we
Speaker 3: see happening over and over again, isn't it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, this is a scenario in what you're saying reminded
Speaker 4: me of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy quote about
Speaker 4: diplomacy in the stages of war. So it goes retribution
Speaker 4: because you know, I'm going to kill you because you
Speaker 4: killed my brother, anticipation, I'm going to kill you because
Speaker 4: I killed your brother, And then there's diplomacy. I'm going
Speaker 4: to kill my brother and then kill you on the
Speaker 4: pretext that your brother did it. And it's just this,
Speaker 4: you know, diplomacy is this web of nonsense you've spun
Speaker 4: out so many lies, and you're justifying everything based on it.
Speaker 3: Just yeah, that's right. So Trump had a bizarre rant
Speaker 3: on social media about Biden and January six screaming do
Speaker 3: something all up her case. Just after midnight on Sunday morning,
Speaker 3: he released onto his social media platform a screed in
Speaker 3: which he claimed that the Biden FBI placed two hundred
Speaker 3: and seventy four agents in the Crown out on January sixth,
Speaker 3: when Trump himself was still president. It wasn't the Biden FBI.
Speaker 3: And I've said this all along to the people, even
Speaker 3: the people who went to jail for years and were
Speaker 3: so excited that Trump finally pardoned them when he could
Speaker 3: have done it before they ever got harassed in the
Speaker 3: first place. But I also said, from the very beginning
Speaker 3: of this, I said, this is not only a grift.
Speaker 3: Trump may turn fifty million dollard to have no idea
Speaker 3: how much Alviick Jones made off of Stop the Steal.
Speaker 3: But they fleeced these people, They endangered these people, and
Speaker 3: then Trump left them to face the consequences from Biden.
Speaker 3: And I said, it's going to be agent provocateurs. You're
Speaker 3: being set up if you go there. And they're not
Speaker 3: only going to be setting you up and sending you
Speaker 3: to jail. They're going to be using this to come
Speaker 3: after the entire conservative movement, even those of us who
Speaker 3: don't support Trump. The president took his social media site
Speaker 3: took to the social media site the dead of night
Speaker 3: to write uppercase, All Uppercase the Biden FB placed two
Speaker 3: hundred and seventy four agents in the crowd on January sixth.
Speaker 3: This is when Trump was president and still contesting the
Speaker 3: election results. He added. If this is so, which it is,
Speaker 3: a lot of very good people will be owed big apologies.
Speaker 3: What a now oliper case scam? Do something, President dj T,
Speaker 3: thank you for your attention. I guess he didn't write
Speaker 3: that this time. I don't know. It's amazing something. Yeah,
Speaker 3: this is his spell is so strong over these people
Speaker 3: that he can even claim that Biden was pulling the
Speaker 3: strings when he was president. Of course, the reality is
Speaker 3: is that the same people are pulling the strings whether
Speaker 3: Trump was president or Biden was president, and they're using
Speaker 3: these two stooges as a left right faint the march
Speaker 3: of tyranny.
Speaker 5: Maybe he meant to say net and Yahoo's FBI.
Speaker 3: Who knows, who knows well, a lot of billionaires are
Speaker 3: preparing for the end of society. Maybe you should too.
Speaker 3: What is it that they are afraid of? Well, a
Speaker 3: futurism says, these guys are investing in bunkers, guns and
Speaker 3: gold and for societal collapse. The text billionaire tech billionaires
Speaker 3: are still doomsday prepping, and as the BBC reports, it
Speaker 3: seems that AI is making some of them more paranoid
Speaker 3: than ever. The society as we know it may soon crumble. Well,
Speaker 3: I think there's a couple of things going on with this.
Speaker 3: I think society as we know it may soon crumble
Speaker 3: with this fourth turning. I think they see that. I
Speaker 3: think a lot of people see it. They don't want
Speaker 3: to use that term, even though they use all the
Speaker 3: generational perspective millennials and so forth that were part of
Speaker 3: that thesis and the words that they coined. However, I
Speaker 3: think they're also looking at what Hugo to Garrison characterized
Speaker 3: as the artel like war, artificial intelligence war. He had said,
Speaker 3: and I guess it was maybe about a decade or
Speaker 3: so ago when I was interviewing Hugo, and I don't
Speaker 3: see the book here, but anyway, the book is out
Speaker 3: of print. It's pretty valuable now. I just don't want
Speaker 3: to sell it yet. But in that, you know, it's
Speaker 3: two The book basically had two premises. Number one, Hugo
Speaker 3: was not a Christian, and so he believed that if
Speaker 3: you could create an exact replica of the brain, it
Speaker 3: would come to life. And it's like, no, that's not
Speaker 3: what it is. It's that spark of life that comes
Speaker 3: from God alone. You know, when you smash mosquito on
Speaker 3: your hand, right, all the elements of that mosquita are
Speaker 3: still there, All the physical elements of that mosquito are there,
Speaker 3: but somehow you've disassembled it, and there's that spark of
Speaker 3: life is gone. And you can sit there and stare
Speaker 3: at that those ingredients for a million years and they'll
Speaker 3: never assemble itself into mosquita. You know. That is so
Speaker 3: you can create an exact replica of the brain and
Speaker 3: it will never become conscious. But that was my difference
Speaker 3: that I had with him. His other thing was that
Speaker 3: he took a very negative contrarian point of view about
Speaker 3: AI that was in contrast to Ray Kurzweil's polyannovation. Ray
Speaker 3: Kurzwel thinks that it's a good thing that we're going
Speaker 3: to create. They think that they're going to create a
Speaker 3: godlike intelligence. Ray kurzwell thought that was a good thing,
Speaker 3: and Hugo to Garrison was one of the first people
Speaker 3: to come out and say that's a bad thing. It'll
Speaker 3: squash us like a bug. And so he would ask
Speaker 3: that question too different communities of scientists when he would
Speaker 3: speak on AI, because he's one of the early experts
Speaker 3: on AI, and he'd ask them, if you knew that
Speaker 3: you were going to create something that was going to
Speaker 3: wipe out humanity, would you still do it? And most
Speaker 3: of the people, the scientists and engineers they talked to,
Speaker 3: said yes, they would. And as I said before, the
Speaker 3: only time that he first time that he ever got
Speaker 3: a first and only time they ever got a negative
Speaker 3: response from the audience was when he addressed a Christian audience,
Speaker 3: and that interesting. However, the other part of his book
Speaker 3: was about the fact that once people catch the idea
Speaker 3: of what AI is going to do to society, which
Speaker 3: were at that point right now, he said that it's
Speaker 3: going to be a massive pushback against the people building this,
Speaker 3: and he said they're going to take to defending themselves.
Speaker 3: He thought, I think that they might be a little
Speaker 3: bit more, a little bit further along than they are
Speaker 3: right now. His idea was that they would take to
Speaker 3: near Earth orbit like the thing that you see in Elysium,
Speaker 3: and so he called them cosmists, and he called those
Speaker 3: of us left behind on Earth terns, and he said
Speaker 3: the cosmists would have technology at their disposal that they
Speaker 3: could unleash gigadath billions of people killed on us. I
Speaker 3: think he'll take the form of some kind of a
Speaker 3: fake pandemic and a bioweapon injection like Trump, or some
Speaker 3: kind of a war that they will engineer here. I
Speaker 3: think rather than waging war on us themselves, they will
Speaker 3: take control of people like Trump and bring on a
Speaker 3: world war. And then that's I think what they're looking
Speaker 3: at right now. But they're also aware that there's a
Speaker 3: lot of momentum building against them, the same scenario that
Speaker 3: Hugo de Garrett talked about in the Artellite War. In
Speaker 3: twenty twenty three, Zuckerberg was breaking ground and roughly five
Speaker 3: thousand square foot underground basement facility that he cared tries.
Speaker 3: Its just a little shelter, definitely not a doomsday bunker. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Five thousand square foot for him is just a little
Speaker 3: little shelter.
Speaker 4: Yeah, apparely any room at all.
Speaker 3: Yeah, these days, a race for AI dominance has ignited
Speaker 3: a new wave of existential fear among the tech elite.
Speaker 3: Or is it that they see the Fourth Turning coming?
Speaker 3: It could be a combination of both of those things.
Speaker 3: I think so an AI system that's generally more intelligent
Speaker 3: than humans will send human society into irreparable chaos, the
Speaker 3: art like war idea, Although it could be that it
Speaker 3: could be that the AI purveyors are just a little
Speaker 3: bit more intelligent than the people who are buying their product,
Speaker 3: and that's all the necessary to create all kinds of
Speaker 3: economic chaos. So one of these guys said, we're definitely
Speaker 3: going to build a bunker before we release artificial general intelligence. Altmann,
Speaker 3: for instance, is known to have a stockpile of guns
Speaker 3: and gold in his bunker. He has sprawling properties and
Speaker 3: other resources that he can turn to in the event
Speaker 3: of an AI inflicted armageddon, or in the event of
Speaker 3: a societal breakdown, or in the event of people figuring
Speaker 3: out what these conment are actually doing. Remember, it was
Speaker 3: Bloomberg when he was running for president, said you know,
Speaker 3: we're trying to take their jobs, and we've got to
Speaker 3: figure out how we're going to stop them from coming
Speaker 3: after us with a guillotine. So we'll use universal basic income.
Speaker 3: And Trump was helping to set the precedent for that
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty with the stimulus checks as well. AI
Speaker 3: also doesn't have to be conscious or achieve human level
Speaker 3: intelligence in order to create chaos in our social world
Speaker 3: and in our financial world either. This AI bubble could
Speaker 3: do it all on its own. But where are these
Speaker 3: people really going. There's an excellent, very very long article
Speaker 3: that we don't have the time to go into fully
Speaker 3: that's on the Free Thought Project that came from Unlimited
Speaker 3: Hangout and the title of it is City States Without Limits,
Speaker 3: Part one and this is about forty or fifty pages long.
Speaker 3: And this is just part one, so I would highly
Speaker 3: I'm going to try to hit some of the high
Speaker 3: points here. But you know, the interesting thing is, when
Speaker 3: I was putting together that AI thing about Trump's apocalypse,
Speaker 3: there was one clip that I going to use in it,
Speaker 3: and lancelick that and he says, no, it's basically a
Speaker 3: bunch of robots walking down an aisle with humans and
Speaker 3: cattle car type of things, reaching out with their hands,
Speaker 3: and I'll show you that. It's what looks like right here, yeah,
Speaker 3: right there. And he said, no, I think what's going
Speaker 3: to happen is you're going to have people say, yeah,
Speaker 3: but I want deportations. That wasn't my idea with that.
Speaker 3: My idea with that was that that's the future for
Speaker 3: all of us. They want to walk us up in
Speaker 3: these cities. So they call them freedom cities, which is
Speaker 3: what Trump calls them, where they call them smart cities
Speaker 3: or fifteen minute cities. They want to limit us into
Speaker 3: these different places and take everything from us. But I
Speaker 3: agreed with them. I said, yeah, that's going to undercut
Speaker 3: this because you've got so many people who say, well,
Speaker 3: I agree with the goals of deportation, and so because
Speaker 3: of that, I will go along with whatever means Trump uses.
Speaker 3: And I said, yeah, you're right. It's that far gone
Speaker 3: that people would actually say, no, I want that. Isn't
Speaker 3: that kind of concerning. It concerns me when I think
Speaker 3: about that, and I think he's absolutely right, and I
Speaker 3: think this way people would interpret that, well, the intention
Speaker 3: is for these city states to form a patchwork of
Speaker 3: realms overseen by regional balance of power and a global
Speaker 3: governance system, a multipolar world order. And so the Trump administration,
Speaker 3: along with these Silicon Valley holigarchs, are pushing for the
Speaker 3: construction of privatized city states. This has been something that's
Speaker 3: been the dream of libertarians for a very long time,
Speaker 3: going back to the eighties or nineties. There are people
Speaker 3: who wanted to do seasteading and get into international waters
Speaker 3: and create a floating city so they could get away
Speaker 3: from government. I share that impulse. I would love to
Speaker 3: get away from government myself. But when you look at
Speaker 3: the way these people are taking that basic idpulse and
Speaker 3: they're shifting it. When you look at the statements from
Speaker 3: people like Curtis Jarvin, you start to see where this
Speaker 3: is maybe heading in a direction that we don't want
Speaker 3: to have as libertarians. New city states, some of them
Speaker 3: being constructed from scratch, others being ceded into existing cities,
Speaker 3: go by many names, and the US Trump has called
Speaker 3: them freedom cities. The UN refers to them as human settlements.
Speaker 3: The people that's the network though, started by City Kahan
Speaker 3: and Michael Bloomberg, they call them fifteen minute cities. The
Speaker 3: Global Parliament of mayors refers to them as resilient cities,
Speaker 3: and the Charter Cities Institute calls them, unsurprisingly charter cities.
Speaker 3: Some of these are already close to being completed as
Speaker 3: smart cities. Many of these new city states, as yet undeclared,
Speaker 3: have been given independent jurisdiction with varying degrees of autonomy
Speaker 3: from the nation states in which they reside. The most
Speaker 3: striking shared trait is their universal commitment to implement global
Speaker 3: governance policy initiatives, that's the sustainable development goals that come
Speaker 3: from the UN. To this end, many nascent city states
Speaker 3: have already joined city based global governance networks. Some are
Speaker 3: currently being built and so called special economic zones. Others
Speaker 3: announced city state developments, such as Freedom Cities in the
Speaker 3: US bear all the hallmarks of these special economic zones.
Speaker 3: The global proliferation of the against special economic zones, I
Speaker 3: guess we could call them says that's the that's the abbreviation,
Speaker 3: as in Simon says or Trump says this that most
Speaker 3: notably those residential spaces, is rapidly expanding the potential locations
Speaker 3: for yet more city state projects. There are already thousands
Speaker 3: of them. The notion of phasing out the purported sovereignty
Speaker 3: of a nation state now firmly embedded in the strategies
Speaker 3: to develop a new kind of intergovernmental structure. So, in
Speaker 3: other words, rather than imposing this from the top down,
Speaker 3: they might give us this global governance from the bottom
Speaker 3: up by creating these different cities. And already when you
Speaker 3: look at the cities, they've said, remember that Pentagon video
Speaker 3: that I played for you. They said, Yeah, this is
Speaker 3: where the war is going to be in the future.
Speaker 3: You're going to have tremendous concentration of people. You're going
Speaker 3: to have competing ethnic groups that are going to be there,
Speaker 3: and this is where the Pentagon is going to be operating.
Speaker 3: Trump is making that happen. The concept of a worldwide
Speaker 3: network of privatized corporate city state kingdoms has been embraced
Speaker 3: and is viewed as the best and most expedient method
Speaker 3: both for enslaving humanity to a centralized digital surveillance and
Speaker 3: a behavioral control grid and for establishing firm global governance.
Speaker 3: And a previous two part investigation for Unlimited Hangout called
Speaker 3: the Dark Maga Government Corporate technical that they also did
Speaker 3: in two parts, they said, we also this is let's
Speaker 3: see the group that does this is unlimited hangout. They said.
Speaker 3: They explored the so called philosophy of the Dark Enlightenment,
Speaker 3: and of course that is coming from the people in
Speaker 3: and around Peter Teel and all the technocrats. This is
Speaker 3: their philosophical treatise for the technocrats. The Dark Enlightenment was
Speaker 3: a philosophical treatise first published by British political theorist and
Speaker 3: philosopher Nick Land in twenty twelve. It incorporated the ideas
Speaker 3: espoused by US thinker, tech entrepreneur and blogger Curtis Jarvin.
Speaker 3: Jarvin's theories are especially loved by J. D. Vance as
Speaker 3: a disciple of Peter Teel, maybe not disciple, as a
Speaker 3: minion of Peter tell And so yeah, it is Curtis Jarvin.
Speaker 3: If you want to get concerned about what the future
Speaker 3: looks like, pay attention to what he has to say.
Speaker 3: In The Dark Enlightenment, Land acknowledged the influence of Peter
Speaker 3: Teal on the growth of his own ideas. Specifically, he
Speaker 3: referenced Teal's two thousand and nine article The Education of
Speaker 3: a Libertarian as formative. Curtis Jarvin describes Teal as quote
Speaker 3: fully enlightened fully part of the Dark Enlightenment, This guy
Speaker 3: who is obsessed with global governance and who is obsessed
Speaker 3: with the Antichrist, and the idea that if you try
Speaker 3: to get in his way, then you are the Antichrist.
Speaker 3: A close associate of Teals and Teal's founder's fund financed
Speaker 3: Jarvin's tech startup ventures. In essence, the Dark Enlightenment proposes
Speaker 3: the public sector government should be replaced with a form
Speaker 3: of private sector government. Privatized corporate realms should be ruled
Speaker 3: by the ceo techno kings, the term that they came
Speaker 3: up with of sovereign corporations. They call him sovcore, to
Speaker 3: rule as dictator leaderships. The realms can then be linked
Speaker 3: to form what Yorvin termed a patchwork of realms. In
Speaker 3: two thousand and eight, he described his notion of the patchwork,
Speaker 3: and he wrote, the basic idea of patchwork is that
Speaker 3: the crappy governments we inherited from history are smashed, and
Speaker 3: they should be replaced by a global spider web of tens,
Speaker 3: even hundreds or thousands of sovereign independent many countries, each
Speaker 3: governed by his own joint stock corporation without regard to
Speaker 3: the resident's opinions without regard to the opinions of the
Speaker 3: people that live there. See, that's the.
Speaker 5: Difference with the pesky concent of the governed.
Speaker 3: Nonsense, Yeah, that's the difference, right, I mean, I would
Speaker 3: like to have governance broken into smaller pieces, but still
Speaker 3: under the principles that this country was founded on, that
Speaker 3: we are created in the image of God, and that
Speaker 3: we have enailable rights, and that we are not beyond
Speaker 3: freedom and dignity. These people buy into BF Skinner's behavioral
Speaker 3: psychological controlling one thousand percent.
Speaker 5: I mean, is this fundamentally any different from the Middle
Speaker 5: Ages system of lords and serfs? Not at all, just
Speaker 5: a return to the old fashioned system with a brand
Speaker 5: new coat of paint. That they call it ark enlightenment
Speaker 5: and give it a techno coat. But it was always
Speaker 5: inevitable that it would get to this when tech, when
Speaker 5: weapons became more centralized, how it became centralized, so government
Speaker 5: will naturally.
Speaker 3: Follow, That's right. As a matter of fact, they point
Speaker 3: that out right here. I'm just about to read that
Speaker 3: imagining what life was like for pressed peasants living in
Speaker 3: the feudal society of medieval Europe is probably the best
Speaker 3: way to visualize the future the darkly enlightened technocrats have
Speaker 3: in mind for us, except they had the kind of
Speaker 3: oversight and continual presence of government during the Middle Ages
Speaker 3: like this technology will give them neither. They have these
Speaker 3: new reactionary it's what they call them n r X.
Speaker 3: They're extremely authoritarian. The Interrex model of government is disassociated
Speaker 3: from any notion of politics as we understand it. Teal
Speaker 3: wrote in his influential two thousand and nine article, the
Speaker 3: objective is to quote find an escape from politics in
Speaker 3: all of its forms. So again, this is not I
Speaker 3: try to fit these guys into our understanding of political philosophies.
Speaker 3: Understand they're looking for something completely different. They don't want politics,
Speaker 3: they want dictatorships. That's where this whole analogy falls apart.
Speaker 3: But it's an excellent article and I'd highly recommend that
Speaker 3: you read it. But we're going to stop here and
Speaker 3: take a break. You want to cover some of the
Speaker 3: comments here.
Speaker 4: Let's grab Stealth Patriot and the rest. When we come back,
Speaker 4: I want to say thank you very much, Stealth Patriot.
Speaker 3: We really do appreciate it.
Speaker 4: Again, it's contributions from listeners like y'all. Let keep us afloat.
Speaker 4: Keep the show running, says the Trumpsters keep cheering on
Speaker 4: the boot of the state to the face of their opponents,
Speaker 4: not realizing that the leather has been broken in for
Speaker 4: their face.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right, it's just amazing. Well, so you want
Speaker 3: to do the comments when we come back, Yes, okay,
Speaker 3: we're going to do that. Then we'll be right back.
Speaker 9: Folks, stay with us in.
Speaker 2: Defending the American dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show, Elvis,
Speaker 2: the Beatle.
Speaker 8: And the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the
Speaker 8: Oldies channel at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 1: Analyzing the globalists next move and now the deep a nutshell.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we have Trump as very upset about the fact
Speaker 3: that he didn't get the Nobel Prize, the Nobel Peace Prise.
Speaker 3: This is something that he has coveted for quite some time.
Speaker 8: Well, they should give me the Nobel Prize for Rwanda.
Speaker 10: And have you looked to coago or I should have
Speaker 10: gotten it four or five times.
Speaker 8: I should get it for the I would think the.
Speaker 10: Rush.
Speaker 3: And so the people are saying, Norway better watch it's
Speaker 3: back right now. What's he going to do? Is he
Speaker 3: going to start shooting boats out of the water or
Speaker 3: is he going to hit him with massive tariffs? The
Speaker 3: Nobel Prize that wasn't Trump's. Why Oslo chose a Venezuelan
Speaker 3: rebel over a peacemaker and so this is a putin
Speaker 3: flattery piece from RTE saying that, well, he really deserved it.
Speaker 3: I think this person who got it, Maria Carina Machado,
Speaker 3: one of the most prominent faces of Venezuela's opposition, was
Speaker 3: one who was awarded the twenty twenty five Peace Prize.
Speaker 3: The committee's language is familiar. They talked about rights, about
Speaker 3: a peaceful transition, but the story behind it isn't. Machado's
Speaker 3: record blends volunteer election networks with long running fights over
Speaker 3: foreign funding. She's been getting, according to allegations, a lot
Speaker 3: of money from the US government to overthrow Maduro, who's
Speaker 3: a successor to Chavez, Hugo Chavez. And it's interesting that
Speaker 3: Chavez Maduro has actually offered to try to buy off
Speaker 3: the American government. He understands that this is not about
Speaker 3: everybody knows it's not about drugs. It's no more about
Speaker 3: drugs with Venezuela than it was about drugs with Canada.
Speaker 3: This is a Trump's layer of his facade of bs
Speaker 3: that he's always doing, this facade of false falsehoods that
Speaker 3: he uses to do this stuff. We all understand it's
Speaker 3: about regime change. We all understand, and furthermore that the
Speaker 3: regime change is about the oil. They have more oil
Speaker 3: than Saudi Arabia does. They just can't get it out
Speaker 3: of the ground because they're communists and they can't do
Speaker 3: anything right. And so Maduro is offering to give some
Speaker 3: capability to the US to be mutually beneficial thing. Actually
Speaker 3: for him, if he was actually able to get the
Speaker 3: oil out, he nationalized the companies and he can't run them.
Speaker 3: That's precisely what Hitler said about Stalin. He said, you know,
Speaker 3: they're both socialists. They both wanted to have centralized command
Speaker 3: and control of the economy eventually. But he said Stalin's
Speaker 3: mistake was that Stalin nationalized the companies and he can't
Speaker 3: do it. He can't run it efficiently. He said, I'm
Speaker 3: going to leave these guys in place, and I will
Speaker 3: then reap the benefits from that. And at the very end,
Speaker 3: you know, if I need to, I'll take them over.
Speaker 3: But I can effectively take them over and have these
Speaker 3: people operate it. That is what fascism is. It's the
Speaker 3: merger of state and government. And so the communists can't
Speaker 3: get this done. So maybe they look at some kind
Speaker 3: of a fascist arrangement and bring the American corporations back in.
Speaker 3: But she has actually made a bigger offer to the US.
Speaker 3: Apparently the award lifts a domestic struggle onto the global
Speaker 3: stage and drops it into a fresh context. For much
Speaker 3: of the year, chatter about a Nobel Prize for Trump
Speaker 3: hung in the air, and the very idea of what
Speaker 3: counts as peacemaking is once up, once again up for
Speaker 3: debate and everywhere. So really, Trump, you know when he
Speaker 3: wants a Nobel Peace Prize? I mean when don't you
Speaker 3: think this is a guy who when he funds and
Speaker 3: supplies continuing wars and Gaza and in Ukraine and then
Speaker 3: pretends that he's the negotiator who's bringing peace. Who would
Speaker 3: have thought that that guy would not get the Nobel Prize.
Speaker 3: Who would have thought that a guy who is violating
Speaker 3: international law and blowing ships out of the water would
Speaker 3: not get the Nobel Peace Prize. Or we could look
Speaker 3: at Afghanistan. He wants to restart that can of worms
Speaker 3: in a fight over the BOGRAM base. Then we could
Speaker 3: talk about the bombing of Iran and all the rest
Speaker 3: of the things. I think he definitely deserves a Nobel
Speaker 3: Peace Prize, don't you. Maria Karna Machado is an engineer
Speaker 3: by training, one of the most recognizable figures in Venezuela's
Speaker 3: opposition over the past two decades. Born in Caracas to
Speaker 3: a family linked to an industrial group, she studied at university,
Speaker 3: later at Venezuela's leading management school. Early exposure to the
Speaker 3: family's business and infinity for market friendly ideas shaped her
Speaker 3: public profile an emphasis on entrepreneurship, privatization, and integration within
Speaker 3: global markets. In two thousand and two, she co founded
Speaker 3: a civic platform that built volunteer networks to train election
Speaker 3: observers and to run parallel vote counts. Now, why would
Speaker 3: you do something like that, Well, it's because Smartmatic was
Speaker 3: created by a few cronies of Hugo Chavez. That's where
Speaker 3: they began in Venezuela rigging elections for him. So what
Speaker 3: she did was she set this organization up and they
Speaker 3: were going to run parallel vote counts because they knew
Speaker 3: that he was rigging the elections, and then Smartmatic got
Speaker 3: involved in one scandal after the other, accused of rigging
Speaker 3: elections in several different Mexican states as well as Brazil,
Speaker 3: and a huge fight over Smartmatic rigging of elections in Philippines.
Speaker 3: This is all before any of this stuff happened in
Speaker 3: the US, which is why I don't understand that nobody
Speaker 3: ever talks about that. I was talking about that before
Speaker 3: any of this stuff happened with a twenty twenty election,
Speaker 3: and it's history, okay, And to say that there was
Speaker 3: the people in all these different jurisdictions believed that Smartmatic
Speaker 3: had not been an honest broker of the elections is
Speaker 3: to make it an understatement. They've been accused of this everywhere,
Speaker 3: but if you do it here in the US, then
Speaker 3: supposedly you get sued or something. Well, they we never
Speaker 3: got sued for that reporting because it's factual and historical.
Speaker 3: So that is when the first major controversy took hold.
Speaker 3: Authority is alleged that the group received funding from the
Speaker 3: US based organizations. Her supporters countered that the money supported
Speaker 3: legitimate civic initiatives, and from then on, every move that
Speaker 3: she made in politics was viewed to the lens of
Speaker 3: where to draw the line on outside assistance, So Maduro's
Speaker 3: only defense was to taint her by saying she was
Speaker 3: taking American money in a subject to American influence. That
Speaker 3: same year, two thousand and two brought Venezuela's most dramatic
Speaker 3: recent upheaval, the brief ouster of Hugo Chavez, but he
Speaker 3: got back into power and then he passed that on
Speaker 3: to Maduro. By the mid twenty tens, Machado had consolidated
Speaker 3: her own political vehicle into a group that was that
Speaker 3: translates the name of Vente Venezuela, which means come Venezuela.
Speaker 3: In public, she argued for deregulation, anti corruption measures, privatization
Speaker 3: and openness to investment, along with a peaceful transition through
Speaker 3: elections and international monitoring of elections. Her biggest surge came
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty three, when she won opposition primaries by
Speaker 3: a wide margin. The ban on her running, however, remained
Speaker 3: in force, and her team faced inspections and rest This
Speaker 3: is basically what's going on in Germany now and also
Speaker 3: to some degree in France. Outlawing the popular opposition to
Speaker 3: the government. In early twenty twenty four, the opposition shifted
Speaker 3: to a substitute candidate at Mundo Gonzalez, a career diplomat,
Speaker 3: but she was recognized as the power behind That registration
Speaker 3: was marred by technical snags, and the MEETA argued over
Speaker 3: whether the campaign conditions were even handed. When the votes
Speaker 3: were counted and the incumbent held on, several foreign governments
Speaker 3: declined to recognize the result, and inside Venezuela, the post
Speaker 3: election map barely moved. In other words, kind of the
Speaker 3: same way that we do it here with gerrymandering. You
Speaker 3: picked the congressional districts, you picked the voters, and you
Speaker 3: basically control the outcome. After the twenty twenty four Machado
Speaker 3: largely disappeared from public events. Her statements came via video,
Speaker 3: with her whereabouts undisclosed. The phrase underground network took cold
Speaker 3: and media shorthand, and supporters saw a movement that was
Speaker 3: operating under pressure against that backdrop. The Nobel Peace Prize
Speaker 3: elevates her biography to the international stage and carries a
Speaker 3: long running national argument over the limits of political struggle
Speaker 3: to a much wider audience. The Nobel Committee said that
Speaker 3: it was honoring her for her tireless work promoting democratic
Speaker 3: rights for the people of Venezuela and for her struggle
Speaker 3: to achieve a just, peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy.
Speaker 3: And this is happening while Trump is working to overthrow
Speaker 3: our own constitution and the rule of law domestically as well,
Speaker 3: so then Venezuela, the same actions that OSLO calls peaceful
Speaker 3: resistance have been framed by officials as destabilization efforts supported
Speaker 3: from abroad. I think she got a win to the
Speaker 3: fact that after they rigged that election, she was the
Speaker 3: next thing to fall, so she disappeared. She has publicly
Speaker 3: voiced support for Washington's decision to combat Venezuela and drug
Speaker 3: cartel's to military means, so she's by no means an
Speaker 3: honest broker. There is no Venezuelan drug cartel that isn't running.
Speaker 3: That is pure fiction from Trump, absolute fiction. Her statement
Speaker 3: drew wide attention as it aligned her stance with the
Speaker 3: US administration's tougher regional policy and blurred the boundary between
Speaker 3: domestic composition and foreign strategy. So it may wind up
Speaker 3: to Trump's benefit the fact that the Nobel Peace Prize
Speaker 3: was given to her. It'll give an aura or a
Speaker 3: facade of legitimacy to his regime change that he's involved in.
Speaker 3: For much of the year, Washington buzzed with talk of
Speaker 3: a Nobel prize for Trump. The President himself didn't hide
Speaker 3: his ambition. He talked about it incessantly. As a matter
Speaker 3: of fact, even when he brought in all the generals
Speaker 3: and admirals from all over the world, he was telling
Speaker 3: them how much he deserved the Nobel Peace Prize. Of
Speaker 3: all the people they would know better. Also, it's just
Speaker 3: who cares, Yeah, he does. It's his ego.
Speaker 4: It's just so again, petty, this is you got to
Speaker 4: bring me in the room. You gotta give me the
Speaker 4: little metal. You're gonna put the little gold star on
Speaker 4: my paper and tell me I'm being.
Speaker 3: A good boy.
Speaker 4: I deserve it.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 4: It's such a petty, narcissistic feed my ego.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, that's what he's about. That's why it really
Speaker 3: does define him. By late twenty twenty five, the Trump
Speaker 3: team listed seven cases whereas diplomacy had helped halt or
Speaker 3: de escalate conflicts. And the reality is is that these
Speaker 3: people in all these different areas say that he didn't
Speaker 3: have anything to do with it. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 3: I didn't play it for you because it was hard
Speaker 3: to hear, but you could kind of hear it if
Speaker 3: you really dialed it up and tuned in. It was
Speaker 3: an official from Azerbaijan who was talking to Macron when
Speaker 3: Trump was addressing the UN, and the two of them
Speaker 3: were laughing about Trump's claim that he brought peace to
Speaker 3: Armenia and Azerbaijan. They were laughing at him at the
Speaker 3: UN over this claim. So the Nobel deadline fell on
Speaker 3: January the thirty first, just eleven days after his inauguration,
Speaker 3: meaning that most of his achievements quote unquote technically ineligible.
Speaker 3: But that didn't stop his backers. Several world leaders and
Speaker 3: families of Israeli hostages publicly endorsed his nomination. And again
Speaker 3: this is sycophanic occurring of favor and flattering him. The
Speaker 3: fact that he claims to have stopped seven wars. White
Speaker 3: House Communication director wrote on X President Trump will continue
Speaker 3: making peace deals, ending wars and saving lives as he
Speaker 3: continues to send bombs to Ukraine and Israel. Yeah, the
Speaker 3: Numbell Committee proved that they placed politics over peace, and
Speaker 3: the Trump White House has proved that it is completely
Speaker 3: detached from reality, but not from Trump's ego. He wanted
Speaker 3: the prize to openly said one person, there's an unwritten rule.
Speaker 3: The more you campaign for it, less likely you are
Speaker 3: to get it. I can just imagine if he did
Speaker 3: get it, he'd get up and he'd probably do that
Speaker 3: Sally feels thing. You love me, you really love me.
Speaker 3: It was fair. Did another mask with Jim Carrey.
Speaker 4: Jim Carrey, Yeah, I mean part of it is no
Speaker 4: one likes a striver, no one likes someone that citizens like.
Speaker 4: I've got to have it. You've got to give it
Speaker 4: to me. I need this well.
Speaker 3: Abortion abortion ambition. Abortion ambition used to be a strong
Speaker 3: disqualifier for office in America. As a matter of fact.
Speaker 3: That was the chief criticism of Lincoln was that he
Speaker 3: was too ambitious. And and now all of our politicians
Speaker 3: don't try to hide their ambition. You know, it used
Speaker 3: to be in the past, you know you would wait
Speaker 3: and say, well, you'd at least try to keep the
Speaker 3: pretense that you were reluctantly pushed into this race, and
Speaker 3: you were you're not running for office, you were standing
Speaker 3: for office. Now these people are desperately sprinting for it
Speaker 3: where they're driving ferraris that were paid for by foreign
Speaker 3: corporations and governments. So August eighth, Trump mediated the signing
Speaker 3: of an a history piece agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan
Speaker 3: at the White House, formerly ending their decades long conflict
Speaker 3: over Nigorno Karabakh and establishing normalized relations, although neither nation
Speaker 3: has ratified, it is for show. In May five, Trump
Speaker 3: claimed credit for brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan,
Speaker 3: though India maintains the truce was achieved directly through bilateral
Speaker 3: military channels without any third party involvement, and that would
Speaker 3: include Trump. And then there's no mention of the fact
Speaker 3: that he threatens to restart the Afghanistan War over Bagram
Speaker 3: Air Force Base in Afghanistan. So again, these seven things
Speaker 3: are just as fraudulent as his claims about insurrection and
Speaker 3: rebellion in the US. Look Out Norway, the Nobel snub
Speaker 3: for Trump leads to concerns he bombed them while he
Speaker 3: assassinates some leaders, will he impose confiscatory tariffs on them.
Speaker 3: Norway is bracing for Trump's reaction if he does not
Speaker 3: win the Nobel Prize. Said The Guardian. Again, the Guardian
Speaker 3: is not necessarily your most reliable source in terms of Trump.
Speaker 3: They hate him incessantly and they let that take over
Speaker 3: their judgment, stating that the US president may impose tariffs,
Speaker 3: demand higher NATO contributions, or even declare Norway to be
Speaker 3: an enemy, according to reports in The Guardian. But one
Speaker 3: user said, how dare them? Tariffs on Norway is now unstoppable.
Speaker 3: But he can also hurt them in many different economic ways.
Speaker 3: And so this is from Judge Napolitano Andrew Napolitano, and
Speaker 3: it is titled when Presidents Kill And let's just understand
Speaker 3: that's what these guys are about about. It's what Bush
Speaker 3: was about, both of them. That's what Trump is about Clinton,
Speaker 3: all of them. You know, is it worth it to
Speaker 3: kill a half a million kids with sanctions? Oh? Yeah
Speaker 3: it was. But what Napolitano is talking about here is
Speaker 3: even more direct action, which Trump is very proud of.
Speaker 3: During the past six weeks, Trump has ordered the US
Speaker 3: troops to attack and destroy four speedboats in the Caribbean Sea,
Speaker 3: fifteen hundred miles from the US. The president revealed that
Speaker 3: the attacks were conducted without warning, were intended not to stop,
Speaker 3: but to kill all persons on board, and that they
Speaker 3: succeeded in their missions. He apparently believes, because these folks
Speaker 3: are presumably foreigners, that they have no rights and that
Speaker 3: he must honor, and that they have no rights that
Speaker 3: he has to honor, and that he may freely kill them.
Speaker 3: As far as we know, none of these nameless, faceless
Speaker 3: persons was charged or convicted of any federal crime. We
Speaker 3: don't know if any of them were Americans, but we
Speaker 3: do know that all of them were extra judicially executed.
Speaker 3: And I've had people even on this program leave comments
Speaker 3: and saying, don't talk to me about rights for foreigners. Well,
Speaker 3: what we're talking about are rights. The concept of rights
Speaker 3: in America are based on the idea that we are
Speaker 3: created in the image of God. And guess what, people
Speaker 3: who don't have US citizenship are created in the image
Speaker 3: of God. And if we allow our government to kill
Speaker 3: people created in the image of God, they will eventually
Speaker 3: kill you without any judicial process as well. Can the
Speaker 3: president legally do this in a word, No, Here's the backstory.
Speaker 3: The Constitution was ratified to establish federal powers and to
Speaker 3: limit them. Congress is established to write the laws and
Speaker 3: to declare war. The president is established to enforce the
Speaker 3: laws that Congress has written, and to be commander in
Speaker 3: chief of the armed forces if they have declared a war.
Speaker 3: Restraints are imposed on both. Congress may only enact legislation
Speaker 3: in the sixteen discreete areas of governance articulate in the Constitution,
Speaker 3: and it may only legislate subject to all persons natural
Speaker 3: rights identified and articulated in the Bill of Rights. The
Speaker 3: President may only enforce the laws that Congress has written.
Speaker 3: He cannot craft his own, and he may employ the
Speaker 3: military only in defense of a real, imminent style attack
Speaker 3: or to fight wars that Congress has declared. The Fifth
Speaker 3: Amendment assures that no person's life, liberty, or property may
Speaker 3: be taken without due process of law. Because the drafters,
Speaker 3: and listen to this, for all of you who say
Speaker 3: foreigners don't have rights and should not be given due process,
Speaker 3: just do whatever you want to to them. Because the
Speaker 3: drafters of the Amendment use the word person rather than citizen,
Speaker 3: the courts have ruled consistently this due process requirement is
Speaker 3: applicable to all human beings. Wherever the government goes, it
Speaker 3: is subject to constitutional restraints as it should be. And
Speaker 3: this is not just a legal detail that is here.
Speaker 3: As I said before, think of the principle. If you're
Speaker 3: going to allow the government to do this kind of
Speaker 3: stuff to people who are foreign citizens, the government will
Speaker 3: eventually do it to you in the United States. And
Speaker 3: we don't want to have that kind of thing. We
Speaker 3: need to keep it restraint on the government. The most
Speaker 3: dangerous thing to your life and to your liberty is
Speaker 3: an unrestrained government, and the purpose of the Constitution was
Speaker 3: to restrain them. That's the Bill of Rights is really about.
Speaker 3: And we ignore that to our own detriment. These things
Speaker 3: will come back around on us if we are not careful. Traditionally,
Speaker 3: due process means a trial, and the case of a civilian,
Speaker 3: it means a jury trial. In the case of enemy combatants,
Speaker 3: it means a fair and neutral tribunal. The tribunal requirement
Speaker 3: came about in an odd and terrifying way. In nineteen
Speaker 3: forty two, four Nazi troops arrived via submarine at the
Speaker 3: Amagansett Beach, New York and exchanged their uniforms for civilian garb.
Speaker 3: At nearly the same time, four other Nazi troops arrived
Speaker 3: via submarine at Ponteverda Beach, Florida, and they also donned
Speaker 3: civilian clothing. All eight of them set about their assigned
Speaker 3: task of destroying American munitions factories. After one of them
Speaker 3: went to the FBI, all eight of them were arrested.
Speaker 3: FDR panicked and ordered all eight summarily executed, even the
Speaker 3: guy who went to the FBI. When two of the
Speaker 3: eight protested in perfect English that they were born in
Speaker 3: the US and their protests proved to be accurate, FDR
Speaker 3: decided to appoint a council for all of them and
Speaker 3: to hold a trial. At trial, all eight were convicted
Speaker 3: of attempting sabotage behind enemy lines, even including the guy
Speaker 3: who became an informant. That is a war crime. In
Speaker 3: Supreme Court quickly returned to Washington from its summer vacation
Speaker 3: and unanimously upheld the convictions. By the time the court
Speaker 3: issued its formal opinion, however, six of the eight had
Speaker 3: already been executed wait for the Supreme Court to weigh
Speaker 3: in on this. The two Americans were sentenced to life
Speaker 3: in prison, and it's not clear as to whether not
Speaker 3: the informant was an American or not. Their sentences were
Speaker 3: commuted five years later by Harry Truman when the war ended.
Speaker 3: The lynch pinned to all of this was FDR's decision
Speaker 3: to appoint council and to have a trial. The Supreme
Speaker 3: Court made it clear that even on lawful enemy combatants,
Speaker 3: those out of uniform and not on a recognized battlefield
Speaker 3: are entitled to due process, But for the trial afforded
Speaker 3: to the Nazi saboteurs, it would not have permitted their executions.
Speaker 3: So this jurisprudence was essentially followed in three Supreme Court
Speaker 3: cases involving foreign persons whom the George W. Bush administration
Speaker 3: had arrested and characterizes as enemy combatants and attained in Gitmo.
Speaker 3: In wartime, US troops can lawfully kill enemy troops that
Speaker 3: are engaged in violence against them, but pursue it. To
Speaker 3: these Supreme Court cases, the UN Charter and the Treaty
Speaker 3: that the US wrote, as well as the International Covenant
Speaker 3: on Civil and Political Rights, another treaty that the US wrote,
Speaker 3: if combatants are not engaged in violence, they may not
Speaker 3: be harmed, but only arrested. All this presumes that Congress
Speaker 3: has in fact declared war on the country or the
Speaker 3: group from which the combatants come from, and that hasn't
Speaker 3: happened since December eighth, nineteen forty one. Now back to
Speaker 3: Trump ordering the military to kill foreigners in the Caribbean.
Speaker 3: International law provides for stopping ships engaged in violence in
Speaker 3: international waters. It also provides for stopping and searching ships
Speaker 3: with probable cause for the search in U s territorial waters,
Speaker 3: but no law permits, and the prevailing judicial jurisprudence deriving
Speaker 3: from the Constitution and federal statutes absolutely prohibits the summary
Speaker 3: murder of folks not engaged in violence on the high
Speaker 3: seas or anywhere else. And this is not just Judge
Speaker 3: Apollo Tano saying this. This has been said by the
Speaker 3: chief judges of the military and various administrations, both Democrat
Speaker 3: and Republican. Republican have come out and opposed this and
Speaker 3: said this is an international war crime what Trump is doing.
Speaker 3: The American General, I'm sorry. The Attorney General has reluctantly
Speaker 3: revealed the existence of a legal memorandum proposing to justify
Speaker 3: Trump's orders and the military's killings, but she insisted that
Speaker 3: the memorandum is classified. So think about this, she says,
Speaker 3: Pambondi again, I agree with the assessment. Perhaps the worst
Speaker 3: attorney general of my life is now saying that, well,
Speaker 3: there may not be any illegal authority for this, but
Speaker 3: as Attorney General, I've given him a memorandum that allows
Speaker 3: him to do this, but you can't see it because
Speaker 3: it's classified in its secret Neapolitano says, a legal memorandum
Speaker 3: can only be based on public laws enacted by Congress
Speaker 3: and interpreted by the courts. There are no secret laws.
Speaker 3: There can be no classified rationale for killing the legally innocent,
Speaker 3: and they are legally innocent until you have given them
Speaker 3: due process. If the memorandum purports to permit the president
Speaker 3: to declare non violent enemy combatants on a whim and
Speaker 3: kill them, it is in defiance of eighty years of
Speaker 3: consistent jurisprudence, and its drafters and executors have engaged in
Speaker 3: serious criminality. Where will these extra judicial killings go next
Speaker 3: to Chicago? You know he's giving himself. He's not just
Speaker 3: giving him self, folks, these powers. He's giving these powers
Speaker 3: to the next Biden, to the next Obama, to the
Speaker 3: next Hillary Clinton. That's who Trump is giving these powers to.
Speaker 3: For all of you who think that the end justifies
Speaker 3: the means, I'm telling you, that's the end. The end
Speaker 3: is that he's giving these powers to some future Democrat
Speaker 3: to do this too. You how do you feel about that?
Speaker 3: Trump has said that the US is at war with
Speaker 3: drug cartels, but is Congress on board? And this is
Speaker 3: an interview back and forth between on World Radio between
Speaker 3: the host their Myrna Brown, and a guest who is
Speaker 3: being interviewed, Carolina Lumetta.
Speaker 5: We have a ton of comments if you want to
Speaker 5: get to that before you move on to another.
Speaker 3: Yeah, let's do that. Let's do that. Thank you, go ahead, Travis.
Speaker 4: That's right, Jim's seven. Thank you very much, appreciate it
Speaker 4: says whatever happened to Greenland? The first smokescreen of the
Speaker 4: forty seven admin.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, I played my little Greenland thing there, But
Speaker 3: that's got Charlie Kirkson, So I imagine I would be
Speaker 3: arrested and putting get mo putting that up. Now.
Speaker 4: My personal conspracy theory is Greenland doesn't exist. It never
Speaker 4: existed at all. It's just a useful tool they trot
Speaker 4: out every once in a while to make you think
Speaker 4: there's a greenland.
Speaker 3: Well, it's a lie. Greenland is covered in ice. It's
Speaker 3: Iceland that's green.
Speaker 4: Greenland is covered ice, and Iceland is very nice.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Real Jason Barker. COVID lockdown, shut down small businesses, and
Speaker 4: the tariffs are now going for the medium sized producers.
Speaker 4: It's a one two punch for consolidation. I'm going to
Speaker 4: make sure there's no business is left aside from the
Speaker 4: major players Yibaru twenty twenty nine. Once Bill Gates has
Speaker 4: stolen enough farmland, the only food being produced will be
Speaker 4: coming out of Bill Gates's bug factories. You will eat
Speaker 4: zibugs Jerry Altalo. Many stock market experts have called for
Speaker 4: banning Wall Street bets, shorts, puts, et cetera, which only
Speaker 4: win when particular company stocks decrease in value.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's the it's those those stocks, put and shorts
Speaker 3: and things like that that turn it into a gambling market.
Speaker 3: You know, if you think of it as investing in
Speaker 3: a company that you think is going to grow, then
Speaker 3: you don't really understand how this whole system works. So
Speaker 3: that's the shorts and the puts that turn it into
Speaker 3: a casino.
Speaker 4: Real Jason Barker says, I do land, guns, ammo, food seeds.
Speaker 3: Et cetera.
Speaker 4: Skills are a great investment as well hand tools, AMMO
Speaker 4: reload set up. There are many ways to set yourself
Speaker 4: up outside the dollar. Pray about it, and God will
Speaker 4: let you know what to do. Yes, Yeah, Guard Goldsmith says,
Speaker 4: great point, Travis, That's one of the mistakes my family
Speaker 4: made early with collectible coins. The collectible side shuts down
Speaker 4: when the economy tanks, so it's better to buy the
Speaker 4: metals or junk silver Nibaru twenty twenty nine. Bush Reagan's
Speaker 4: nineteen seventy nine nineteen eighty campaign. So logan was let's
Speaker 4: make America great again. Trump's nothing more than a plagiarizing grifters,
Speaker 4: too lazy to even make his.
Speaker 3: Own I was absolutely amazed. You know, when he ran
Speaker 3: the first time, How in the world can he try
Speaker 3: to copyright that right? Because he was suing people that
Speaker 3: merchandise stuff. So that's other people. I've said that for
Speaker 3: the longest time.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Stealth Patriot says, invest in a lot of lead.
Speaker 4: That's right. Make sure that you are able to protect yourself.
Speaker 4: You want to be able to defend yourself, and you
Speaker 4: want to know how to do that. You can get
Speaker 4: the Civil Defense Manual. Volumes one and two at jacklosson
Speaker 4: books dot com. It'll teach you not just about defending yourself,
Speaker 4: but how to prepare, find water, find food, that sort
Speaker 4: of thing, and work as a community. So Civil Defense Manual,
Speaker 4: jacklosson books dot com. Yes, Trucker Chris for the win.
Speaker 4: Imagine laws that prevent any APAC funded candidates being allowed
Speaker 4: to participate in electoral politics. Well, anybody that tried to
Speaker 4: put forward that law would get shot.
Speaker 3: Yeah, listen along that line. I've got a thing about
Speaker 3: APAC actually using barcodes for politicians.
Speaker 11: Initially, I resented the fact that there was no appreciation
Speaker 11: for nuance. If you asked any questions about any decision
Speaker 11: of the Israeli government in any place regarding settlements, regarding gaza,
Speaker 11: regard whatever you were, like, you had deviated from the script,
Speaker 11: and I just in any policy area, I had resentment
Speaker 11: over that. And then I saw the way the APAC
Speaker 11: worked and that that was weird for like a country
Speaker 11: lawyer like me. I remember my first a pack reception,
Speaker 11: and like your fundraiser tells you you have to go,
Speaker 11: and your chief of staff deals you have to go.
Speaker 11: Your committee chairman, I'll tell you have to go and
Speaker 11: you get there and you wear this name badge and
Speaker 11: I remember there's.
Speaker 4: A QR code on it.
Speaker 11: And what we were supposed to do was go talk
Speaker 11: to donors and then if they liked you, they scanned
Speaker 11: your QR code to make a donation, like on the spot.
Speaker 11: And so this you act you have de moralizing. That
Speaker 11: is to be told that your job for the next
Speaker 11: several hours to go chat people up hoping they would
Speaker 11: scan you like a can of tomato soup. On the
Speaker 11: way out of the meeting.
Speaker 2: It's like, I'm literally purchasing, right.
Speaker 3: I love that.
Speaker 11: And I was like, Wow, that is so freaking weird.
Speaker 3: And then now you know why he didn't make it
Speaker 3: into the administration because I guess they didn't like to
Speaker 3: didn't scan his barcode or whatever at apack enough. Yeah,
Speaker 3: isn't that amazing? Weird?
Speaker 5: Demoralizing, These aren't the words I would use. Disgusting, repulsive,
Speaker 5: These are more what describe this act of open corruption,
Speaker 5: convenience market to buy politicians.
Speaker 3: Well, I've said for the longest time that the politicians
Speaker 3: ought to be forced to dress like NASCAR drivers. Well,
Speaker 3: your sponsors are listed on your uniform, right that your
Speaker 3: your suit should be all over that, you know, and
Speaker 3: who's paying for it. But this is a step beyond that.
Speaker 3: This is I'm literally a can of soup that they're
Speaker 3: going to buy if they like it, if I make
Speaker 3: enough promises for what I'll do for Israel and they
Speaker 3: send me the money.
Speaker 4: I'm just imagining a Jewish couple, would you like anything
Speaker 4: from the store on my way home? Pick me up?
Speaker 4: A senator too, you know.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 5: And of course, the one time we saw someone trying
Speaker 5: to push back on something similar to this was Frank
Speaker 5: Nicely trying to prevent out of state money coming into
Speaker 5: state elections. Yeah, and of course that didn't get passed,
Speaker 5: and then he had a massive amount of out of
Speaker 5: state money flooding in supporting his opponent in the next election.
Speaker 3: Yeah. If you go against the corruption, the corruption goes
Speaker 3: against jew that's not works. And then you are then
Speaker 3: a former politician, so.
Speaker 4: You don't get to last long if you're a man
Speaker 4: of integrity, that's right. Chev Ken says, no caeso, no cheese,
Speaker 4: question Mark.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's that's the joke.
Speaker 4: I don't I don't understand how that's supposed to be funny.
Speaker 4: I guess it's just like they're stupid.
Speaker 3: Ha ha, no komprendo.
Speaker 4: Yeah, see no comprende god Ender Goldsman. So they are saying,
Speaker 4: no cheese, no chie, leave it to Maga to lumber
Speaker 4: through even on AI production. Yeah, let's yeah. I truly
Speaker 4: do not understand how it's supposed to be humorous a
Speaker 4: real Octose book. It is all chipping away rights in
Speaker 4: the war on American citizens. We can only expect more. Yeah,
Speaker 4: we have a Syrian girl sad to see this happening
Speaker 4: to what was a great nation in our time, right
Speaker 4: before our eyes.
Speaker 3: Real quick.
Speaker 4: Another thing about that AI video is just it's not
Speaker 4: funny on any level. No people get pepper spray routinely.
Speaker 4: You could at least go like an absurdist route, like
Speaker 4: you know, a tank drives up and vaporizes the person.
Speaker 4: You know, that could at least be somewhat humorous in
Speaker 4: the sense of, oh, they've gone over the top, this
Speaker 4: is ridiculous. But no, it's just the cop pulls out
Speaker 4: pepper spray. It's like you can watch a video of this,
Speaker 4: a real video.
Speaker 3: I don't like what you're saying. Yeah, I remember years
Speaker 3: ago when you had the it was on the Berkeley
Speaker 3: campus in California over the top. Just they did a
Speaker 3: set in and you have this guy who comes home
Speaker 3: with pepper spray and just walks spring them in the face.
Speaker 3: I mean that's real. And now you know the right
Speaker 3: is cheering that they like that. I'm disgusted by that.
Speaker 3: I'm disgusted by these maga people. One and a half
Speaker 3: million likes. Just amazing the Syrian girls. Sad to see
Speaker 3: this happening to what was a great nation in our time,
Speaker 3: right before our eyes, on our watch, yea, says David.
Speaker 3: Most voters for Trump voted in abject fear of having
Speaker 3: La La and Obama in charge of the new regime.
Speaker 3: Most are not maga. Well yeah, but there's one a
Speaker 3: half million people who like this force that's going to
Speaker 3: be used by Democrats against us. I mean, this isn't
Speaker 3: even projection this. We've already seen this happen with January
Speaker 3: the sixth. These people will never learn. The ones that
Speaker 3: it happened to are cheering this on to have it
Speaker 3: happen again.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and I bring this up frequently, and whenever I
Speaker 5: mentioned it, I always see comments pushing back against it.
Speaker 5: But we need to get rid of first past the
Speaker 5: post voting, that's what causes this whole thing. It was, oh, well,
Speaker 5: they just voting because they didn't want to have Lalla,
Speaker 5: and that would be even worse because you know it's
Speaker 5: down to the two of them with ranked choice. I
Speaker 5: see comments whenever I mentioned it saying, oh, it's easier
Speaker 5: to rig. The thing is, there are just elections that
Speaker 5: are ranked choice, so it's possible to do it. And
Speaker 5: they are already rigging the first past the post, so
Speaker 5: it's not like that's going to prevent.
Speaker 3: Well, and the rigging lance starts not with the voting,
Speaker 3: not with counting the votes. The rigging begins with ballot access.
Speaker 3: I can tell you fighting that they do everything they
Speaker 3: can to keep you out of the ballots. If they
Speaker 3: can't keep you off the ballots, then they keep you
Speaker 3: out of the debates and they don't have debates, which
Speaker 3: is what we saw with Trump this last time. Democrats
Speaker 3: inoculated him against any criticism from fellow Republicans. He didn't
Speaker 3: have to go to the debates because you know, he
Speaker 3: was the he was unfairly being attacked by them, and
Speaker 3: he was unfairly attacked by them, So what what did
Speaker 3: he do to us in twenty twenty. That's the thing.
Speaker 3: I look at it, and I understand people voting in
Speaker 3: fear against La La and Biden and that type of thing.
Speaker 3: But let me say that I think that the most
Speaker 3: dangerous person is the person who gets behind you in
Speaker 3: order to stab you in the back. And that's one
Speaker 3: of the reasons why they were going to have some
Speaker 3: summary execution of these spies who came in to sabotage infrastructure.
Speaker 3: And they were in civilian clothing. You know, spies are
Speaker 3: killed right away. Soldiers in uniform we try to have
Speaker 3: along with the Geneva Convention, we try to accommodate them
Speaker 3: because they're coming at you in a uniform, and so
Speaker 3: we treat them in a different way than we treat spies.
Speaker 3: And I consider the people who stabbed us in the back,
Speaker 3: Trump and all of his people in twenty twenty, I
Speaker 3: consider them to be saboteurs and spies, not enemy combatants.
Speaker 3: The Democrats are enemy combatants, and yeah, they ought to
Speaker 3: be shot on the battlefield. But the more dangerous columns
Speaker 3: that are out there is the fifth column that's inside
Speaker 3: the city. It's not the fourth columns are coming at you,
Speaker 3: but it's the fifth column that's inside the city that
Speaker 3: you think is on your side. That's the problem with Trump.
Speaker 5: Yeah, So what I was saying about the voting is
Speaker 5: it always comes down to that with controlled candidates from
Speaker 5: the major parties, when you have first past the post,
Speaker 5: there's a turn grade. I forget what it is, but
Speaker 5: it's someone's law that it will always boil down to this.
Speaker 5: It's inevitable. There's an even better style of voting called,
Speaker 5: I believe it's approval voting, where you just give each
Speaker 5: candidate up to a certain number of points and then
Speaker 5: just total up the points, which would be just as
Speaker 5: easy to do highly up the votes as the existing
Speaker 5: first past the post.
Speaker 3: Well, I agree, And when you look at if you
Speaker 3: want to get rid of first past the post, you
Speaker 3: have more than two parties. If you only have two parties,
Speaker 3: you're always going to have first past the post.
Speaker 5: But first past the post means that it will always
Speaker 5: be down to two parties because if you have a
Speaker 5: third party, then it's going to everyone who would vote
Speaker 5: for that are instead going to vote for the one
Speaker 5: that's more likely to win. Of the two big parties.
Speaker 3: You have to make sure they've got a majority, and
Speaker 3: so that's what you see in a parliamentary system where
Speaker 3: they allow multiple parties. We don't allow multiple parties here
Speaker 3: in the United States. The Democrats and Republicans have got
Speaker 3: so much power and corruption that they shut that down
Speaker 3: a long long time ago in America. But if you've
Speaker 3: got multiple parties, whoever wins has to put together a
Speaker 3: coalition government, and so there's some restraint on that. But yeah,
Speaker 3: let's go ahead and finish these.
Speaker 4: Ibrew twenty twenty nine. Throughout history, every eighty to ninety
Speaker 4: years has been a great human culing on the planet.
Speaker 4: The last was in the nineteen forties. Do the math
Speaker 4: tunnel Lord when three three seven It is also saying
Speaker 4: that your speech can be silenced when they support those
Speaker 4: Ai videos. That's right, Audi mur Maga cultists are cheering
Speaker 4: on martial law for themselves.
Speaker 3: They'll get it.
Speaker 4: I'm Marty says, well that chi Apocalypse divid be uploaded
Speaker 4: separately so they can be copied and pasted.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you should post on time. Oh well, yeah, we'll
Speaker 3: put that up on Twitter after the show.
Speaker 4: First we had Chirac announce the Chai Apocalypse px MAC.
Speaker 4: The media wants civil war. It's losing control of the narrative.
Speaker 4: I'm Marty Trump blamed Biden's fi for J six infiltration.
Speaker 4: Trump forgot he was still pres on that day Trumps
Speaker 4: entered the Bidenheimer's zone. It's utterly ridiculous. Just either he's
Speaker 4: completely ineffective and couldn't root out the problem people in
Speaker 4: his administration and as such, you know, he's not worth
Speaker 4: having in or he's part of their team and the
Speaker 4: Trump people are completely incapable of seeing that. Chevkin says
Speaker 4: Biden FBI Trump really is senile. Px mac says Gaza cities,
Speaker 4: open air prisons duged a double O seven. We could
Speaker 4: even call them reservations.
Speaker 3: That's right. Yeah, that's why I talk about that. You know,
Speaker 3: when you look at concentration camps, as I've said, didn't
Speaker 3: start with the Nazis. It started with the American government
Speaker 3: and the Indians. That's exactly what all this stuff is. Yeah,
Speaker 3: it just keeps coming back around because human nature doesn't change,
Speaker 3: and so politics fundamentally doesn't change either.
Speaker 4: That's a That's another thing so many people don't understand
Speaker 4: is that human nature is inherently sinful. It's inherently bad,
Speaker 4: and you cannot trust people with power. Yeah, you have
Speaker 4: to continually any power you give them, you have to
Speaker 4: watch them with it. And it's just if you don't
Speaker 4: understand that, you cannot be trusted with politics. Niberu twenty
Speaker 4: twenty nine. Social engineers are masters of hurting Sheeple Unlimited
Speaker 4: Hangout series. The PayPal presidency is extremely informative.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they'd do good work, and it's very very detail,
Speaker 3: very detail.
Speaker 4: Niberu twenty twenty OUTI MRR police need to wake up.
Speaker 4: The predator's class plans do not include them. Yeah, that's
Speaker 4: the thing. I've always said that if these people, you know,
Speaker 4: the elite whatever you want to call the mega rich,
Speaker 4: were to succeed in their goal of basically getting rid
Speaker 4: of all of us, they would immediately start plotting against
Speaker 4: each other. They cannot stand other people. They want to
Speaker 4: be the only person left. Jerry Alatalo Trump administration, arch technocrats, Musk, Teal, Vance,
Speaker 4: Jarvin Sex Andresen Kratzios, Lutnik Ellison combine it worth one
Speaker 4: point two trillion dollars PX smack funny how evil people
Speaker 4: always reverse the intent of their objectives.
Speaker 5: What worries me about Teal saying how much he opposes
Speaker 5: the Antichrist.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's like Trump saying that he opposes a globalist,
Speaker 3: isn't it the thing? He is a globalist, and you
Speaker 3: know it's teal is as in terms of conduct is
Speaker 3: the Antichrist.
Speaker 4: It's truly amazing, just.
Speaker 5: The old Patriot Act double thing for his peace.
Speaker 3: I love this Nobel War Prize. That's why he deserves that.
Speaker 3: They got that. Well, he's able to change the defense departments.
Speaker 3: Maybe he can get the Nobel people to change their
Speaker 3: name and give him a prize after all, right, you
Speaker 3: can get the Nobel War Prize.
Speaker 4: Maybe you can get a participation in the Nobel Prize
Speaker 4: or something.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Karen Carpenter twenty seven. Good to see you, Karen Carpenter.
Speaker 4: I hope you're doing well. Technology such as the television
Speaker 4: was used as a weapon from its beginning.
Speaker 3: The difference is is that when you look at, you know,
Speaker 3: the newspapers. Of course, what was it hersh said that
Speaker 3: he could deliver a war for Wilson and did, And
Speaker 3: so you look at the propaganda that comes from the newspapers.
Speaker 3: And then when they started doing radio made it much
Speaker 3: more powerful, and when they started doing television more powerful.
Speaker 3: Still now with the Internet, which was designed by a
Speaker 3: DARPAT psychologist. They are not only able to reach people
Speaker 3: with their own propaganda like this and you know, as
Speaker 3: a joke or whatever, but they're able to measure your
Speaker 3: response to that and fine tunate. That's what the Internet
Speaker 3: has brought to them, the ability and of course AI
Speaker 3: as well, the ability to not only give you the propaganda,
Speaker 3: but to know if you saw it, and to know
Speaker 3: if you agree with it or disagree with it, so
Speaker 3: they can find tunate. That's what's made it so dangerous.
Speaker 4: And of course Karen Carpenter is part of Knights of
Speaker 4: the Storm. You can find yeah, all that infot Knights
Speaker 4: of the Storm dot com. They have a great resource
Speaker 4: there for finding out when all the friendly shows O
Speaker 4: whether it's nice of the Storm this one or Guard's
Speaker 4: Liberty conspiracy. You can find that on Knights of the
Speaker 4: Storm dot com. Hero May says Nobel War Prize. That's right,
Speaker 4: Trump Berger, he would have definitely won if they had
Speaker 4: a category for mass death. Christian kNs social conservative. Trump
Speaker 4: said that she told him he deserved the prize. Has
Speaker 4: that been confirmed? Well, she's sucking up?
Speaker 3: Well, I would yes, that would be true, that she
Speaker 3: is herself in a position of being a US agent.
Speaker 3: If she's going to suck up to him and publicly
Speaker 3: say that these shootings of these boats under the allegation
Speaker 3: that it's part of a war against a drug cartel,
Speaker 3: that is absolutely fault. Since she's going to lie about that,
Speaker 3: she should lie to him and flatter him. Putin is
Speaker 3: flattering him in terms of this Nobel Prize stuff, and
Speaker 3: so anybody that wants a thing from him, they know
Speaker 3: how to get to him, is flattery.
Speaker 4: His ego makes him very easy to manipulate one way
Speaker 4: or the other. You know how he'll react. The real
Speaker 4: octo spook. When you have to disguise taxes on Americans,
Speaker 4: lie and call them foreign tariffs, you respect for the
Speaker 4: tariff is already non existent. Yep, real octos. Pok Obama
Speaker 4: proved the Nobel Peace Prize is a worthless pos Trump
Speaker 4: deserves it. That's right up there in good company.
Speaker 3: Mike Wendel just lost his suit. I guess smart Mac
Speaker 3: got's I'm sorry to He seems like a nice guy,
Speaker 3: even though he's unbelievably naive. I think he is genuine,
Speaker 3: and I think he's been fooled into this. One person says,
Speaker 3: you can see that he's screaming into that pillow. I
Speaker 3: feel sorry for him. He had a tough life and
Speaker 3: he overcame with my pillow, and then he got completely
Speaker 3: suckered in by all this Trump stuff, and so I
Speaker 3: do feel sorry for him. I felt sorry for the
Speaker 3: January to six people. I don't think they deserved what
Speaker 3: was done to them, and many of them still don't
Speaker 3: understand it. I wonder if Mike Lindell still understands it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, who knows? Christian cons social Conservative. A criminal network
Speaker 4: known as the Gartel of the Suns operates in Venezuela,
Speaker 4: though it is not a cartel in the conventional sense. Instead,
Speaker 4: the term refers to a loose, decentralized network of corrupt
Speaker 4: military and political officials who facilitate drug trafficking and other
Speaker 4: criminal activities.
Speaker 3: I don't know if that's true or not. Quite. Frankly,
Speaker 3: the Cartel of the son sounds, I mean like an
Speaker 3: invention of the government. As a matter of fact, I've
Speaker 3: reported that many people have said that it's kind of
Speaker 3: interesting that trend Arugra or whatever, the trendy gang. Yeah,
Speaker 3: an invention of the American government to start with, and
Speaker 3: Remember they created the Mujahadeen, which is also al Qaeda
Speaker 3: and ISIS and all the rest of the stuff in
Speaker 3: this Al Nusra gang that is killing Christians and everybody
Speaker 3: in Syria. So our government does that kind of thing,
Speaker 3: So it should always be a possibility with you and
Speaker 3: all this stuff about cartel the sons is a narrative
Speaker 3: that was created by the Trump administration to create a
Speaker 3: justification for what they're criminally and illegally doing. Their gang
Speaker 3: of thugs. That's all you need to know. The gang
Speaker 3: of thugs is in Washington.
Speaker 4: Right, Audi mrre responding to Christian Constitutional Conservative says there's
Speaker 4: a map that indicates where drugs come from, and that
Speaker 4: part of the world. Venezuela is not where the drugs
Speaker 4: are coming from.
Speaker 3: Right, everybody understands that.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Audi Mr. R BB basically said that terrorists attack
Speaker 4: will happen in New York, Austin, mar Lago and others.
Speaker 4: It will be Israel doing it, but they will blame iron.
Speaker 4: A blind man can see this coming from a mile away. Absolutely,
Speaker 4: Irs machine gun, Thank you very much, we appreciate it.
Speaker 4: Wonder if Trump has looked on Pam's desk for his
Speaker 4: Nobel prize.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 4: There's a lot of stuff on that desk. Maybe it
Speaker 4: just got lost Niberu twenty twenty nine. There's thousands of
Speaker 4: secret laws written into the CIA, into the ACA. Ohbamba care. Yeah,
Speaker 4: they have to pass him to see what's in it.
Speaker 4: But then they don't ever bother going back and checking.
Speaker 4: I don't want to read that. That's boring Niberu twenty
Speaker 4: twenty nine. Again, don't buy her Ammo from Walmart, Dix
Speaker 4: or cal Ranch. There's others as well. All three report
Speaker 4: Amo sales to the FEDS by using cash only. Credit
Speaker 4: card NAMO purchases are also reported. Audi Mr Trump is
Speaker 4: banking on an ice agent or National Guard soldier injury
Speaker 4: or worse by member of the public. He needs that
Speaker 4: one event to get his Insurrection Act agenda to the
Speaker 4: next phase. They may stage one.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yes, okay, well we got one more and read.
Speaker 4: That one a miller one two three. Evil is evil.
Speaker 4: There is no two party system. They're all on the
Speaker 4: same team. You only get to vote to make you
Speaker 4: think you are contributing.
Speaker 3: That's right. Let's talk about this before we take a break,
Speaker 3: because we're getting close to the end of the show
Speaker 3: and I did want to talk about this. We got
Speaker 3: a Tennessee man who has been arrested in connection to
Speaker 3: a Charlie Kirk social media post. Arrested folks, and he's
Speaker 3: being held under massive bail. What was it, two million dollars?
Speaker 5: I think he got two million dollars bail for yeah, tweet,
Speaker 5: a joke.
Speaker 3: A joke, and it is quite clear what is going on.
Speaker 3: He quoted President Trump, and because he put up a
Speaker 3: meme that quoted President Trump, they are they came after him.
Speaker 3: They said, well, you know, we can't arrest somebody for
Speaker 3: hating Charlie Kirk, but we can pretend that you're threatening
Speaker 3: a school, which is what they did. A Tennessee man
Speaker 3: is the first to be arrested for social media posts
Speaker 3: made regarding the assassination of Charlie Kirk. And again, when
Speaker 3: we look at this, Charlie Kirk was about going to
Speaker 3: these places and engaging in debate and standing for the
Speaker 3: First Amendment. If he was about anything that was I'm
Speaker 3: my disagreements to Charlie Kirk. I have a lot of
Speaker 3: disagreements with Charlie Kirk. I've chosen not to go into
Speaker 3: them right at this moment, but I got to say
Speaker 3: that these people who are their virtue signaling to their
Speaker 3: base that Charlie Kirk is the be all and end all,
Speaker 3: and we're going to punish anybody that says anything negative
Speaker 3: about him. They are the antithesis of what the guy did,
Speaker 3: and that's what we're seeing here. Larry Bouchart, sixty one,
Speaker 3: from Lexington, Tennessee, is a former police officer, and he
Speaker 3: was arrested September twenty second and charged with threats of
Speaker 3: mass violence on school property and activities after posting a
Speaker 3: photo and Facebook comments of a Perry County community group page.
Speaker 3: The sheriff there told the Tennessee And that statement the
Speaker 3: participants on the page were planning to host a Charlie
Speaker 3: Kirk vigil. Bouchard posted multiple photos in the comments referencing
Speaker 3: Charlie Kirk's death, which the sheriff said were hate memes,
Speaker 3: but he said, well, they're not against the law, and
Speaker 3: we would have to recognize that as free speech, So
Speaker 3: we twisted something else that he had to say. One image, however,
Speaker 3: caught their attention. In it, you have Trump saying we've
Speaker 3: got to get over it. And this was a direct
Speaker 3: quote from Trump. After a January twenty twenty four school
Speaker 3: shooting in Perry, Iowa that left one dead and seven wounded.
Speaker 3: So after school shooting, Trump said We've got to get
Speaker 3: over it. And that school shooting was in Perry, Iowa.
Speaker 3: Now this is Perry High School in Perry County, Tennessee.
Speaker 3: And so Bouchard's picture consists of an image of Trump
Speaker 3: along with a quote ofttributed to Trump on the Perry
Speaker 3: High School mass shooting one day after. But it doesn't
Speaker 3: have the state of Iowa there. It doesn't say Perry, Iowa.
Speaker 3: It just says and it's Trump, and it says we've
Speaker 3: got to get over it. Now, how is we've got
Speaker 3: to get over it? How is that a threat to
Speaker 3: do violence to a school? So the school just to recap,
Speaker 3: the school has got a memorial or some kind of
Speaker 3: Charliekirk event that's coming up, and he's saying, you know
Speaker 3: this is you got to move on or whatever. Stop
Speaker 3: making so much out of this. I don't know what
Speaker 3: the other posts are about. But then he puts up
Speaker 3: a quote from Trump saying we got to get over it,
Speaker 3: and that was Trump talking about people being killed at
Speaker 3: a school. So because of that, now this sheriff has
Speaker 3: construed that as grounds for arresting him. The photo is
Speaker 3: topped with a phrase this seems relevant today, like maybe
Speaker 3: you should get over this and move on. A cross
Speaker 3: referencing of the photo done by the Tennessee and found.
Speaker 3: This image has been posted numerous times across multiple social
Speaker 3: media platforms not connected with Bouchart, going back to twenty
Speaker 3: twenty four. He did not craft this thing specifically for
Speaker 3: this event, because that's the other thing they're saying. They said, well, okay, there,
Speaker 3: you can see it right there, Donald Trump on the
Speaker 3: Perry High School mass shooting one day after we got
Speaker 3: to get over it. Now, that picture. He did not
Speaker 3: create that meme. But they're coming back and saying, well,
Speaker 3: because you said Perry in a high school, that we
Speaker 3: think that you're referring to our Perry High School. No,
Speaker 3: it's been put all over the internet.
Speaker 5: Arrested and in jail with two million dollars bail for
Speaker 5: posting this.
Speaker 3: Yeah, isn't that amazing? Isn't that amazing? So Bouchard posted
Speaker 3: the picture to indicate or to make the audience think
Speaker 3: that it was referencing our Perry High School. Said this, Sheriff,
Speaker 3: this sheriff needs to be defeated. This led teachers, parents
Speaker 3: and students to conclude that he was talking about a
Speaker 3: hypothetical shooting at one of our schools. Well, then that's
Speaker 3: on them. If they're that stupid, you can't start arresting
Speaker 3: people because stupid people are offended by something that is
Speaker 3: not about them at all. Investigators believe that Bouchart was
Speaker 3: fully aware of the fear that his post would cause
Speaker 3: and intentionally sought to create hysteria within the community. No,
Speaker 3: that is not the case at all. What he's saying
Speaker 3: is move on from this stuff. Why keep going back
Speaker 3: to the wall For Charlie Kirk. Waves of firings and
Speaker 3: suspensions have already occurred across the country in connection with
Speaker 3: the individual's social media posts about Kirk, as conservative politicians
Speaker 3: and influencers pushed for a crackdown. I'll say this a
Speaker 3: crackdown on free speech. A Phoenix sportswriter, a University of
Speaker 3: Mississippi faculty member, school employees in Idaho, Indiana, South Carolina,
Speaker 3: emergency workers, a theater professor, and other university employees in Tennessee,
Speaker 3: and US Marine Corps recruiter and many more have been
Speaker 3: among the professionals fired and suspended or put on leave
Speaker 3: over social media posts that some found offensive. These comments
Speaker 3: are protected free speech, although the First Amendment does not
Speaker 3: annoculate people against actions that private employers would take. But
Speaker 3: Bouchard's situation is unique. He was charged under a state
Speaker 3: law that was passed in July twenty twenty four that
Speaker 3: makes it a class eve felony to make threats against schools.
Speaker 3: And this is a really bad law that we have
Speaker 3: here in Tennessee. The law, which has faced accusations of
Speaker 3: being overbroad in its language, has ensnared many. During the
Speaker 3: twenty twenty four fiscal year, five hundred and eighteen children
Speaker 3: in Tennessee were arrested with this law, and seventy one
Speaker 3: of the children were between the ages of seven and eleven.
Speaker 3: Do they really think that these kids are threatening the school?
Speaker 3: But that's the way it's been used, and that's being
Speaker 3: used against the guy because he criticized an event, said
Speaker 3: you need to get over it, and he was quoting
Speaker 3: President Trump using a meme that he didn't even create.
Speaker 3: This is how bad things are. Does don't support any
Speaker 3: of the Bill of Rights. Thank you for joining us
Speaker 3: the common man. They created common core and dumbed down
Speaker 3: our children. They created common past, track and control us.
Speaker 3: They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 3: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 3: unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
Speaker 3: created in the image of God. That is what we
Speaker 3: have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Speaker 3: Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 3: to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 3: It's time to turn that around out and expose what
Speaker 3: they want to hide. Please share the information and links
Speaker 3: you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Speaker 3: Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
Speaker 3: please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com