WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.240 --> 00:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Ola the gates. Dear Rich, how are you already?

2
00:00:05.280 --> 00:00:07.919
<v Speaker 2>Irish people are helping to shape the EU of the future.

3
00:00:08.480 --> 00:00:11.439
<v Speaker 2>Now it's your turn. The EU is currently recruiting for

4
00:00:11.519 --> 00:00:14.679
<v Speaker 2>roles across lots of exciting areas. If you're an Irish

5
00:00:14.720 --> 00:00:17.800
<v Speaker 2>citizen with a degree and the second EU language which

6
00:00:17.839 --> 00:00:20.679
<v Speaker 2>includes Irish, that could be a role for you. Bring

7
00:00:20.719 --> 00:00:24.000
<v Speaker 2>a little more Ireland to the EU. Find out how

8
00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:27.120
<v Speaker 2>to apply at Ireland dot e forward slash EU Jobs

9
00:00:27.719 --> 00:00:29.519
<v Speaker 2>brought to you by the Government of Ireland.

10
00:00:30.600 --> 00:00:33.679
<v Speaker 1>But police don't think Kevin's death what's an accident?

11
00:00:34.320 --> 00:00:38.200
<v Speaker 2>In the new Sky original crime drama three years.

12
00:00:37.960 --> 00:00:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Apart, Kevin died and they say, starring Kelly Riley and

13
00:00:41.719 --> 00:00:44.359
<v Speaker 3>Race Spawn, if we find anything that could link the cases,

14
00:00:44.560 --> 00:00:46.679
<v Speaker 3>then we'll link them. We don't have time.

15
00:00:46.960 --> 00:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Evidence has already been washed away.

16
00:00:48.799 --> 00:00:50.799
<v Speaker 3>No secrets are safe from the storm.

17
00:00:50.880 --> 00:00:51.920
<v Speaker 2>I need to find out.

18
00:00:51.719 --> 00:00:55.119
<v Speaker 3>What watch under Soul to Marsh, available now on Sky

19
00:00:55.439 --> 00:00:57.359
<v Speaker 3>eighteen plus requires a Sky TV subscription.

20
00:00:57.399 --> 00:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Content available from thirtieth of January twenty twenty six.

21
00:00:59.359 --> 00:01:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Further terms of place.

22
00:01:02.320 --> 00:01:05.959
<v Speaker 2>Meaning a live man like this man letting butterfly, flapping

23
00:01:06.040 --> 00:01:07.560
<v Speaker 2>his wing, big down in the forest.

24
00:01:07.599 --> 00:01:08.959
<v Speaker 4>Man it gonna cause the tree.

25
00:01:08.760 --> 00:01:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Fall letting five thousand miles away.

26
00:01:11.079 --> 00:01:12.319
<v Speaker 4>Man, nobody seen it.

27
00:01:12.400 --> 00:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Nobody else, you know, mean.

28
00:01:18.680 --> 00:01:22.879
<v Speaker 2>No man like you followed a little story.

29
00:01:22.120 --> 00:01:25.519
<v Speaker 1>And you got backed like that, win Man got.

30
00:01:25.319 --> 00:01:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Back to day on the panel.

31
00:01:26.519 --> 00:01:36.799
<v Speaker 4>Man Man, you don't don't matter many, all right, bug

32
00:01:36.840 --> 00:01:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Man Hagel, Welcome to the Jay Burdon Show. How you doing?

33
00:01:40.280 --> 00:01:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Hi, glad to be here.

34
00:01:43.359 --> 00:01:46.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so we got connected. We have some some mutuals

35
00:01:46.280 --> 00:01:49.359
<v Speaker 4>on Twitter, and so, you know, I'm familiar with who

36
00:01:49.359 --> 00:01:50.920
<v Speaker 4>you are and what you do, but some of my

37
00:01:51.000 --> 00:01:53.079
<v Speaker 4>audience might not be. So what do you do on

38
00:01:53.120 --> 00:01:53.640
<v Speaker 4>the internet?

39
00:01:55.159 --> 00:02:00.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I started my account of the long and

40
00:02:00.280 --> 00:02:03.840
<v Speaker 3>short of it is. I was active on Reddit. I

41
00:02:03.879 --> 00:02:06.640
<v Speaker 3>wasn't really active anywhere else. I got permanently banned from Reddit,

42
00:02:06.719 --> 00:02:09.159
<v Speaker 3>and so I just started posting on Twitter. I was

43
00:02:09.199 --> 00:02:13.520
<v Speaker 3>in law school. I was really frustrated with the environment

44
00:02:13.560 --> 00:02:18.439
<v Speaker 3>in law school. It was it was obviously very asymmetric

45
00:02:18.560 --> 00:02:23.560
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the opinions of the professor the students

46
00:02:24.120 --> 00:02:27.960
<v Speaker 3>in general, and so I kind of used Twitter as

47
00:02:28.000 --> 00:02:32.560
<v Speaker 3>my outlet to kind of lamit the cultural environment as

48
00:02:32.599 --> 00:02:37.280
<v Speaker 3>well as the political environment. On Twitter, I have a

49
00:02:37.439 --> 00:02:41.159
<v Speaker 3>mix of topics. I cover. I used to cover a

50
00:02:41.159 --> 00:02:44.639
<v Speaker 3>lot more of kind of esoteric history. I covered a

51
00:02:44.680 --> 00:02:49.159
<v Speaker 3>lot more about Hegel, kind of the hermetic influences on

52
00:02:49.199 --> 00:02:57.199
<v Speaker 3>the Protestant Reformation, some stuff about Kabbola, how Kabla had

53
00:02:57.280 --> 00:03:02.680
<v Speaker 3>influenced certain Protestant schism movements, the Moravians and the Atabaptists.

54
00:03:03.680 --> 00:03:05.840
<v Speaker 3>But nowadays I'm really busy, So I just I just

55
00:03:05.960 --> 00:03:10.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of do some like a surface level of political commentary.

56
00:03:10.400 --> 00:03:11.960
<v Speaker 3>And that's kind of the long and short of it.

57
00:03:14.280 --> 00:03:19.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's interesting because if you talk to older people,

58
00:03:19.879 --> 00:03:24.800
<v Speaker 4>right boomers will just use that that slur. There's you know,

59
00:03:24.840 --> 00:03:28.439
<v Speaker 4>this idea that, oh, you know, once these these college kids,

60
00:03:28.719 --> 00:03:30.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, as broadly defined as that term is, hit

61
00:03:30.840 --> 00:03:34.879
<v Speaker 4>the real world, then they'll realize right there, their parents

62
00:03:34.919 --> 00:03:39.240
<v Speaker 4>were right all along. And I didn't get anything after

63
00:03:39.360 --> 00:03:43.560
<v Speaker 4>my undergrad degree. I burnt out on education for you know,

64
00:03:43.599 --> 00:03:48.000
<v Speaker 4>any number of reasons. But it's sort of interesting that

65
00:03:48.000 --> 00:03:50.520
<v Speaker 4>that you know, idea of you know, getting in the

66
00:03:50.560 --> 00:03:55.280
<v Speaker 4>real world, you know, quote unquote uh really never seems

67
00:03:55.360 --> 00:04:00.280
<v Speaker 4>to pan out, to be perfectly honest, and that track

68
00:04:00.319 --> 00:04:03.240
<v Speaker 4>of education, you know, from undergrad to your graduate degree

69
00:04:03.280 --> 00:04:06.879
<v Speaker 4>post grad all that it's like this this treadmill to

70
00:04:06.879 --> 00:04:10.919
<v Speaker 4>make you more and more of an obnoxious progressive hall monitor.

71
00:04:11.280 --> 00:04:14.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's kind of like chasing gold stars. And

72
00:04:14.639 --> 00:04:17.480
<v Speaker 4>so you mentioned, of course, right that you know law

73
00:04:17.480 --> 00:04:22.079
<v Speaker 4>school was non representative, right, it was very much one opinion.

74
00:04:22.759 --> 00:04:25.199
<v Speaker 4>So what was it like being a sort of a

75
00:04:25.240 --> 00:04:27.360
<v Speaker 4>dissident in that in that space, if you will.

76
00:04:28.000 --> 00:04:32.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I I went to a Bury. My my

77
00:04:32.360 --> 00:04:35.160
<v Speaker 3>undergrad degree is in biochemistry, and I also I did

78
00:04:35.199 --> 00:04:39.920
<v Speaker 3>a dual jd and masters as a little background, my

79
00:04:40.000 --> 00:04:43.920
<v Speaker 3>undergrad my undergrad, I was a bit more insulated despite

80
00:04:43.959 --> 00:04:48.439
<v Speaker 3>going to a more liberal undergraduate program because of the

81
00:04:48.480 --> 00:04:52.360
<v Speaker 3>fact that I was in STEM and so I was

82
00:04:52.519 --> 00:04:57.319
<v Speaker 3>less I was less around the more kind of let's say,

83
00:04:57.480 --> 00:05:01.959
<v Speaker 3>radical cohorts in my undergrad but I was still exposed

84
00:05:01.959 --> 00:05:04.920
<v Speaker 3>to it here and there. I won't go into the details.

85
00:05:04.920 --> 00:05:07.639
<v Speaker 3>So there's a couple of big scandals with uh, like

86
00:05:08.079 --> 00:05:11.439
<v Speaker 3>people got suspended from the sports teams for let's say,

87
00:05:12.720 --> 00:05:17.759
<v Speaker 3>throwing tortillas at a date auction and things like that.

88
00:05:17.879 --> 00:05:21.079
<v Speaker 3>I thought they were outrageous, but I kind of kept

89
00:05:21.160 --> 00:05:23.560
<v Speaker 3>more to myself. It like, it wasn't really in my

90
00:05:23.639 --> 00:05:25.560
<v Speaker 3>face because of the program I was in so I

91
00:05:25.680 --> 00:05:27.839
<v Speaker 3>was like, you know, I'm just want to get this

92
00:05:27.879 --> 00:05:31.480
<v Speaker 3>over with. And then law school, it was it was

93
00:05:31.839 --> 00:05:38.480
<v Speaker 3>more unavoidable because this stuff was integral to the coursework itself.

94
00:05:39.079 --> 00:05:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Like in criminal law, you're talking about different types, different

95
00:05:42.639 --> 00:05:47.399
<v Speaker 3>theories for justice, like you have retributive justice, you have

96
00:05:47.480 --> 00:05:51.399
<v Speaker 3>rehabilitative justice, and then you have punitive justice. And there

97
00:05:51.480 --> 00:05:55.439
<v Speaker 3>was obviously a clear preference among U with that particular professor,

98
00:05:56.079 --> 00:05:58.959
<v Speaker 3>like for rehabilitative justice. And for those who don't know,

99
00:05:59.399 --> 00:06:04.160
<v Speaker 3>that's basically where the point of incarceration is rehabilitation of

100
00:06:04.160 --> 00:06:09.160
<v Speaker 3>criminals as opposed to protecting the public from them. And

101
00:06:10.040 --> 00:06:12.879
<v Speaker 3>a lot of our problems in criminal justice dim from

102
00:06:12.920 --> 00:06:16.560
<v Speaker 3>the back of the fact that the rehabilitative justice school

103
00:06:16.879 --> 00:06:21.399
<v Speaker 3>is kind of the overarching trend we have been consistently

104
00:06:21.439 --> 00:06:27.680
<v Speaker 3>heading to really since the night late night, And really

105
00:06:28.720 --> 00:06:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I was being successively radicalized in the right wing direction,

106
00:06:33.600 --> 00:06:36.319
<v Speaker 3>and it was really something that happened to me after

107
00:06:36.360 --> 00:06:40.720
<v Speaker 3>I graduated law school and moved to Houston for a

108
00:06:40.839 --> 00:06:45.920
<v Speaker 3>job that really kind of like just blew the whole

109
00:06:45.920 --> 00:06:48.920
<v Speaker 3>thing up my face, because, like I was, I had

110
00:06:48.920 --> 00:06:51.199
<v Speaker 3>been in Houston for less than a week starting my

111
00:06:51.279 --> 00:06:55.839
<v Speaker 3>new job, and I got burglarized about four days after

112
00:06:55.920 --> 00:06:58.839
<v Speaker 3>I moved there at two am, and it was just

113
00:06:58.959 --> 00:07:01.759
<v Speaker 3>like I just started kind of looking into like the

114
00:07:01.759 --> 00:07:05.160
<v Speaker 3>political environment of the city of Houston, and it was

115
00:07:05.319 --> 00:07:08.480
<v Speaker 3>just kind of one of the first times where like

116
00:07:08.720 --> 00:07:12.800
<v Speaker 3>my politics kind of or like the opposition to my

117
00:07:13.120 --> 00:07:18.959
<v Speaker 3>politics viscerally interacted with me. And I was just like,

118
00:07:20.279 --> 00:07:23.480
<v Speaker 3>this is not working. Like I'm a young new grad

119
00:07:23.680 --> 00:07:26.920
<v Speaker 3>and I'm being I'm just having all these things like

120
00:07:26.959 --> 00:07:28.800
<v Speaker 3>throw it in my face by no fault to my own.

121
00:07:28.959 --> 00:07:32.759
<v Speaker 3>And I talked to like Boom or family members, and

122
00:07:32.800 --> 00:07:35.439
<v Speaker 3>they just kind of treat it as like the cost

123
00:07:35.480 --> 00:07:39.199
<v Speaker 3>of doing business, like the cost of existing. And I

124
00:07:39.240 --> 00:07:41.720
<v Speaker 3>was like, why why are we accepting this? Like why

125
00:07:42.000 --> 00:07:44.199
<v Speaker 3>why is this something that we are going to put

126
00:07:44.279 --> 00:07:46.439
<v Speaker 3>up with as a society that like like kind of

127
00:07:46.519 --> 00:07:48.319
<v Speaker 3>people who go out of their way to be lawbiding,

128
00:07:48.399 --> 00:07:54.759
<v Speaker 3>productive citizens are just effectively at the whims of any

129
00:07:54.800 --> 00:07:58.199
<v Speaker 3>petty criminal that should choose to victimize them. It was

130
00:07:58.360 --> 00:08:01.120
<v Speaker 3>just an incoherent frame of mind.

131
00:08:03.439 --> 00:08:05.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I'm glad that you brought up the fact that,

132
00:08:06.000 --> 00:08:10.160
<v Speaker 4>in the example of a word, I have a hard

133
00:08:10.199 --> 00:08:14.040
<v Speaker 4>time saying justice. One of the things that I find

134
00:08:14.040 --> 00:08:17.639
<v Speaker 4>incredibly frustrating in an academic setting with many of these

135
00:08:17.639 --> 00:08:20.240
<v Speaker 4>people is that they don't know their own history. They

136
00:08:20.279 --> 00:08:22.839
<v Speaker 4>assume that they are at the cutting edge of a

137
00:08:22.879 --> 00:08:26.720
<v Speaker 4>new idea, right Whereas if you understand it, and you know,

138
00:08:26.759 --> 00:08:29.839
<v Speaker 4>we're antribute to justice, thank you, I finally got it out.

139
00:08:29.839 --> 00:08:33.240
<v Speaker 4>There is one of kind of this cluster of different

140
00:08:33.320 --> 00:08:37.519
<v Speaker 4>ideas that have effectively been in academia since the late

141
00:08:37.559 --> 00:08:42.360
<v Speaker 4>fifties to early sixties. And there's not a new experiment, right,

142
00:08:42.399 --> 00:08:45.559
<v Speaker 4>this is this that we have tried this before with

143
00:08:45.840 --> 00:08:49.840
<v Speaker 4>predictable results, and you know, look like, of course it

144
00:08:49.879 --> 00:08:53.600
<v Speaker 4>produces bad results. You get broken into and you know,

145
00:08:53.600 --> 00:08:57.879
<v Speaker 4>your apartment in Houston. But similarly, it just kind of

146
00:08:58.360 --> 00:09:03.320
<v Speaker 4>bothers me that by alling to power, they get to

147
00:09:03.360 --> 00:09:06.080
<v Speaker 4>sort of play pretend as radicals. Right. Play pretend is

148
00:09:06.080 --> 00:09:08.360
<v Speaker 4>if they've come up with this great new idea that

149
00:09:09.320 --> 00:09:11.879
<v Speaker 4>was old by the time my grandparents were going through school.

150
00:09:12.360 --> 00:09:14.919
<v Speaker 4>It's you know, not the primary objection to it, but

151
00:09:15.000 --> 00:09:16.679
<v Speaker 4>very much something that kind of rubs me the wrong way,

152
00:09:16.679 --> 00:09:17.720
<v Speaker 4>if you see what I'm getting at.

153
00:09:18.519 --> 00:09:23.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I think part of it is liberalism has

154
00:09:23.679 --> 00:09:27.240
<v Speaker 3>a degree of staying power and I believe it's because

155
00:09:27.279 --> 00:09:31.759
<v Speaker 3>it is a comforting idea, especially like just Anglo Saxons

156
00:09:31.759 --> 00:09:37.919
<v Speaker 3>in general, but especially Anglo Saxon's post twentieth century kind

157
00:09:37.919 --> 00:09:40.879
<v Speaker 3>of have built their I don't want to say have

158
00:09:40.960 --> 00:09:45.559
<v Speaker 3>created new like American ethogenesis, especially postththr they kind of

159
00:09:45.679 --> 00:09:51.039
<v Speaker 3>have where American culture espeal, specifically American Anglo Saxon culture

160
00:09:51.720 --> 00:09:58.159
<v Speaker 3>is one of like overcoming basically the constraints of the material,

161
00:09:58.360 --> 00:10:00.919
<v Speaker 3>and they do that through this like having this like

162
00:10:01.000 --> 00:10:06.480
<v Speaker 3>platonic ideal that man is infinitely malleable and you can

163
00:10:06.639 --> 00:10:11.320
<v Speaker 3>infinitely mold man by altering the conditions. It's it's almost

164
00:10:11.440 --> 00:10:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Faustian to the degree because like it allows you to

165
00:10:14.919 --> 00:10:20.919
<v Speaker 3>like this iterative infinitely overcoming the bounds of my bounds

166
00:10:20.919 --> 00:10:23.679
<v Speaker 3>to my conditions. And I believe kind of this like

167
00:10:23.759 --> 00:10:29.960
<v Speaker 3>blink slate egalitarianism is residual of that where like not

168
00:10:30.039 --> 00:10:33.120
<v Speaker 3>even biology is a constraint for us, and you kind

169
00:10:33.120 --> 00:10:36.480
<v Speaker 3>of see this developing in like I know, like transhumanism

170
00:10:36.600 --> 00:10:40.120
<v Speaker 3>is kind of a buzzword, but transhumanism just in terms

171
00:10:40.159 --> 00:10:46.200
<v Speaker 3>of let's say, widening human cognitive capacity through things like

172
00:10:46.279 --> 00:10:50.480
<v Speaker 3>neuralink and like exploring the final Frontier, which is Elon

173
00:10:50.559 --> 00:10:53.759
<v Speaker 3>Musk's entire project. And so I think this kind of

174
00:10:53.759 --> 00:10:58.480
<v Speaker 3>blink slate egalitarianism is just another facet of this, of

175
00:10:58.519 --> 00:11:03.360
<v Speaker 3>this kind of Faucian concept that you can terrorform literally everything,

176
00:11:03.679 --> 00:11:08.720
<v Speaker 3>including like humankind individually and as groups.

177
00:11:10.039 --> 00:11:14.679
<v Speaker 4>Well, and that's that same idea in the perfect malleability

178
00:11:14.720 --> 00:11:18.320
<v Speaker 4>of man. I think you see it nowhere else more

179
00:11:18.679 --> 00:11:22.639
<v Speaker 4>than in education. The idea is that, you know, the

180
00:11:22.639 --> 00:11:27.399
<v Speaker 4>these certain fields are and kind of stasis made up

181
00:11:27.480 --> 00:11:30.080
<v Speaker 4>of demographics that we don't approve. We want it to

182
00:11:30.120 --> 00:11:34.039
<v Speaker 4>be more representative, more made up of our of our clients.

183
00:11:34.519 --> 00:11:37.519
<v Speaker 4>And so the idea is by simply passing people through

184
00:11:38.039 --> 00:11:41.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, the hallowed halls. It's like, oh, well, Harvard

185
00:11:41.840 --> 00:11:45.759
<v Speaker 4>makes Supreme Court justices. So if we just jam a

186
00:11:45.799 --> 00:11:49.000
<v Speaker 4>bunch of our people, you know, people we decide that

187
00:11:49.039 --> 00:11:53.039
<v Speaker 4>we want through that door, well will just produce you know,

188
00:11:53.200 --> 00:11:56.559
<v Speaker 4>similarly august figures, and by sort of passing through the

189
00:11:56.639 --> 00:12:01.080
<v Speaker 4>magic door, they will become the same thing. You see

190
00:12:01.080 --> 00:12:07.240
<v Speaker 4>this as well, honestly, probably more clearly in public school system, right,

191
00:12:07.279 --> 00:12:10.759
<v Speaker 4>the idea is simply like the piece of paper is

192
00:12:10.799 --> 00:12:14.039
<v Speaker 4>the signifier. And so if you can simply increase the

193
00:12:14.120 --> 00:12:16.279
<v Speaker 4>number of people or the sort of people getting something.

194
00:12:17.440 --> 00:12:21.720
<v Speaker 4>They can be molded into that sort of idealized form.

195
00:12:22.320 --> 00:12:26.720
<v Speaker 4>It's very much related to the sort of magic dirt

196
00:12:26.720 --> 00:12:30.200
<v Speaker 4>fallacy you see with immigration, where if we simply take

197
00:12:30.200 --> 00:12:32.799
<v Speaker 4>the entire world and stick them into a place that

198
00:12:32.919 --> 00:12:36.159
<v Speaker 4>was nice ten years ago, well they will enjoy the

199
00:12:36.159 --> 00:12:39.320
<v Speaker 4>benefits of that place being nice, and it become the

200
00:12:39.320 --> 00:12:43.440
<v Speaker 4>same sort of people. Weirdly enough, this kind of reminds

201
00:12:43.480 --> 00:12:48.279
<v Speaker 4>me of the and there's no polite term for this,

202
00:12:49.120 --> 00:12:56.679
<v Speaker 4>but the we'll go Friedman's schools after the American Civil War,

203
00:12:57.240 --> 00:13:02.600
<v Speaker 4>where effectively you had basic you know, Massachusetts wasps coming

204
00:13:02.639 --> 00:13:09.840
<v Speaker 4>down to the reconstructive South in designed to basically eradicate

205
00:13:10.960 --> 00:13:13.480
<v Speaker 4>what was black culture at the time and turn them

206
00:13:13.480 --> 00:13:19.440
<v Speaker 4>into progressive white people. Right. And it's funny because, weirdly enough,

207
00:13:19.480 --> 00:13:23.240
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the kind of like Nation of Islam

208
00:13:23.240 --> 00:13:26.039
<v Speaker 4>black separatist types make this exact same point, one of

209
00:13:26.279 --> 00:13:28.480
<v Speaker 4>very few points of agreement I have with those guys.

210
00:13:28.840 --> 00:13:31.440
<v Speaker 4>But effectively it's the same project, right. It's this idea

211
00:13:31.480 --> 00:13:35.159
<v Speaker 4>that we can, through education and training, turn this culture

212
00:13:35.279 --> 00:13:39.840
<v Speaker 4>into something like us. It's sort of this bizarre kind

213
00:13:39.879 --> 00:13:43.000
<v Speaker 4>of progressive imperialism, if that term makes sense to.

214
00:13:43.000 --> 00:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>You, Bookman.

215
00:13:44.799 --> 00:13:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I believe kind of the one of the

216
00:13:49.759 --> 00:13:54.000
<v Speaker 3>primary historical modes of operation that have or let's say

217
00:13:54.120 --> 00:13:58.440
<v Speaker 3>substraits that have allowed for this to be facilitated. I really,

218
00:13:59.080 --> 00:14:03.279
<v Speaker 3>I might make the stance mad, but I think Protestantism

219
00:14:03.720 --> 00:14:07.720
<v Speaker 3>was really integral as the delivery method for a lot

220
00:14:07.759 --> 00:14:13.440
<v Speaker 3>of these ideas. I'm an orthodox Christian and so but

221
00:14:13.960 --> 00:14:16.720
<v Speaker 3>so take that with what you will. My biases are

222
00:14:16.720 --> 00:14:20.799
<v Speaker 3>out there. But the kind of issue or what I

223
00:14:20.960 --> 00:14:29.759
<v Speaker 3>see with Protestantism, especially especially kind of the more apocalyptic types,

224
00:14:29.879 --> 00:14:33.440
<v Speaker 3>they like to compress the transcendent and the inminet and

225
00:14:33.559 --> 00:14:36.960
<v Speaker 3>basically flatten that difference. And so therefore the idea is

226
00:14:37.000 --> 00:14:41.399
<v Speaker 3>like this, we have to pure, imminently purify the world

227
00:14:41.600 --> 00:14:46.559
<v Speaker 3>in order for skistological project to proceeed. And you see

228
00:14:46.559 --> 00:14:50.679
<v Speaker 3>this kind of with the Social Gospel movement and Raush

229
00:14:50.720 --> 00:14:54.960
<v Speaker 3>and Bush back in the eighteen fifties. And like the

230
00:14:55.000 --> 00:14:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Social Gospel and Raush and Bush were really deprogenitors of

231
00:14:58.240 --> 00:15:03.399
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the the Northeast social justice initial initiatives.

232
00:15:03.720 --> 00:15:06.919
<v Speaker 3>They were the kind of inspiration behind the whole house.

233
00:15:08.240 --> 00:15:10.799
<v Speaker 3>They're the inspiration behind a lot of a lot of

234
00:15:10.799 --> 00:15:14.000
<v Speaker 3>the civil civil rights movements. You have a lot of

235
00:15:14.039 --> 00:15:21.200
<v Speaker 3>progressive progressive Protestants participating and encouraging civil rights movements. And

236
00:15:21.440 --> 00:15:23.720
<v Speaker 3>part of this is I think, I think it is

237
00:15:23.759 --> 00:15:27.919
<v Speaker 3>specifically a type of I guess a apocalyptic strain that

238
00:15:28.039 --> 00:15:34.720
<v Speaker 3>is especially unique to evangelicalism, where the mot the mode

239
00:15:34.759 --> 00:15:38.320
<v Speaker 3>of thinking is that purification of the world is necessary.

240
00:15:38.840 --> 00:15:41.840
<v Speaker 3>And so obviously you have to look at the frame

241
00:15:42.080 --> 00:15:45.759
<v Speaker 3>of which one is purifying the world, Like if if

242
00:15:46.039 --> 00:15:51.320
<v Speaker 3>you think the world will be pure given certain precepts,

243
00:15:51.320 --> 00:15:53.879
<v Speaker 3>you are going to follow those precepts to their logical conclusion.

244
00:15:54.080 --> 00:15:57.679
<v Speaker 3>And so if that kind of delivery method is combined

245
00:15:57.759 --> 00:16:02.799
<v Speaker 3>with these pre extant, uh aggressive precepts, that that kind

246
00:16:02.840 --> 00:16:05.399
<v Speaker 3>of religion is going to pull these precepts to their

247
00:16:05.440 --> 00:16:09.799
<v Speaker 3>logical conclusion, which ends up being blank slade galitarianism. Part

248
00:16:09.799 --> 00:16:14.080
<v Speaker 3>of purifying the world is this absolute state of equality.

249
00:16:14.519 --> 00:16:18.759
<v Speaker 3>And that's why the Social Gospel where they were an

250
00:16:18.759 --> 00:16:25.120
<v Speaker 3>integral movement with the Christian socialists, and you kind of

251
00:16:25.120 --> 00:16:28.720
<v Speaker 3>see the Protestant influence on the Fabian society, and there's

252
00:16:28.759 --> 00:16:32.480
<v Speaker 3>all these kind of overlapping strands that kind of point

253
00:16:32.559 --> 00:16:39.559
<v Speaker 3>to this weird imanitizing, almost quasi apocalyptic mode of thinking

254
00:16:39.559 --> 00:16:44.120
<v Speaker 3>about politics and human society. I mean, I don't know

255
00:16:44.159 --> 00:16:46.720
<v Speaker 3>if you're familiar with Eric Boglin, but it's Eric Boglin's

256
00:16:46.720 --> 00:16:50.000
<v Speaker 3>famous line of iminitizing the esketon. And that's kind of

257
00:16:50.080 --> 00:16:54.639
<v Speaker 3>what at least the evangelical strain of Prosantism has has

258
00:16:54.799 --> 00:16:55.720
<v Speaker 3>ushered in.

259
00:16:58.000 --> 00:17:04.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think fundamentally. And it's funny. I'm not necessarily

260
00:17:04.680 --> 00:17:08.039
<v Speaker 4>like a Southern lost cause type, but you know, they

261
00:17:08.039 --> 00:17:12.960
<v Speaker 4>talk about this quite a bit that effectively what you

262
00:17:13.000 --> 00:17:16.759
<v Speaker 4>have in America is two distinct cultures, right, Northern and

263
00:17:16.799 --> 00:17:22.319
<v Speaker 4>Southern culture, with profoundly different views on human nature and

264
00:17:22.680 --> 00:17:27.960
<v Speaker 4>effectively the perfectibility of man. So in a cultural sense,

265
00:17:28.000 --> 00:17:32.119
<v Speaker 4>you see the output of this kind of tragic understanding

266
00:17:32.160 --> 00:17:34.920
<v Speaker 4>of human nature and things like Southern Gothic literature, right,

267
00:17:34.960 --> 00:17:38.680
<v Speaker 4>the idea that man is at his core deeply flawed,

268
00:17:39.319 --> 00:17:42.039
<v Speaker 4>but there is nobility to be found in how you

269
00:17:42.079 --> 00:17:45.720
<v Speaker 4>manage that flaw. Right. Whereas you know the concept of

270
00:17:46.079 --> 00:17:48.559
<v Speaker 4>you know, the city on a Hill, which I believe

271
00:17:49.559 --> 00:17:54.839
<v Speaker 4>was initially coined by oh, shoot, what was his name?

272
00:17:55.400 --> 00:17:57.920
<v Speaker 4>He was one of the initial pilgrims. I can't quite remember, right,

273
00:17:57.920 --> 00:18:02.039
<v Speaker 4>but this idea of setting up a new novel and

274
00:18:02.160 --> 00:18:06.960
<v Speaker 4>perfected society is something you can sort of bring the

275
00:18:07.000 --> 00:18:10.480
<v Speaker 4>city of God into being in the world. The idea that,

276
00:18:11.119 --> 00:18:13.039
<v Speaker 4>in much the same way talking about education, that you

277
00:18:13.079 --> 00:18:18.359
<v Speaker 4>can fundamentally change what a man is. And actually, if

278
00:18:18.359 --> 00:18:21.039
<v Speaker 4>we're gonna I realized mold Bug has become sort of

279
00:18:21.119 --> 00:18:28.519
<v Speaker 4>unfashionable recently, but he has a series of essays on Quakers,

280
00:18:29.200 --> 00:18:33.000
<v Speaker 4>and he particularly talks about the idea of prison, you know,

281
00:18:33.039 --> 00:18:35.319
<v Speaker 4>not simply as like a dungeon, we throw you before,

282
00:18:35.359 --> 00:18:38.039
<v Speaker 4>we either let you go or peel your skin off

283
00:18:38.039 --> 00:18:40.920
<v Speaker 4>and set you on fire. You know, this was more

284
00:18:41.000 --> 00:18:44.400
<v Speaker 4>common before they came around, and the idea in that

285
00:18:44.640 --> 00:18:48.119
<v Speaker 4>was basically that, you know, prison was a sort of

286
00:18:49.480 --> 00:18:52.400
<v Speaker 4>like state and judicial form of purgatory or you could

287
00:18:52.440 --> 00:18:56.039
<v Speaker 4>sort of you know, work off your sins. And so

288
00:18:56.400 --> 00:18:59.960
<v Speaker 4>in the early days of these reformatory prism prisons are

289
00:19:00.039 --> 00:19:01.559
<v Speaker 4>what they call them is they have these sort of

290
00:19:01.640 --> 00:19:07.119
<v Speaker 4>like comedically like sissify and jobs, you know, like they

291
00:19:07.200 --> 00:19:09.599
<v Speaker 4>just have a box with a paddle full of sand

292
00:19:10.079 --> 00:19:12.559
<v Speaker 4>and they just make you turn this wheel for hours

293
00:19:12.599 --> 00:19:14.920
<v Speaker 4>on end, and that was your prison sentence. And okay,

294
00:19:14.920 --> 00:19:18.440
<v Speaker 4>maybe that's better than just you know, eating you know,

295
00:19:18.480 --> 00:19:21.119
<v Speaker 4>mac and cheese and you know, getting in you know,

296
00:19:21.160 --> 00:19:23.119
<v Speaker 4>shive fights with Mexicans or whatever we do in our

297
00:19:23.119 --> 00:19:26.640
<v Speaker 4>prisons now. But you still you have that idea that,

298
00:19:27.000 --> 00:19:31.079
<v Speaker 4>you know, the point of criminal justice is not to

299
00:19:33.119 --> 00:19:36.640
<v Speaker 4>avenge the wrong, punished the guilty, but it is to

300
00:19:36.759 --> 00:19:43.960
<v Speaker 4>produce a measurable like a moral improvement and change in

301
00:19:44.000 --> 00:19:48.079
<v Speaker 4>the criminal himself. It sort of becomes this social engineering project,

302
00:19:48.480 --> 00:19:52.079
<v Speaker 4>and that same idea is scaled up, of course, the

303
00:19:52.119 --> 00:19:55.240
<v Speaker 4>idea that you can do that to an entire society,

304
00:19:55.480 --> 00:19:58.400
<v Speaker 4>which becomes there is a moral duty to do that too,

305
00:19:58.920 --> 00:20:00.920
<v Speaker 4>cultures who are not as enlightened as you are, that

306
00:20:00.960 --> 00:20:04.240
<v Speaker 4>you can you know, wage a massive war or you know,

307
00:20:04.279 --> 00:20:07.799
<v Speaker 4>with your own society, or the idea that democracy needs

308
00:20:07.799 --> 00:20:10.279
<v Speaker 4>to be exported to the world. It's this sort of

309
00:20:11.119 --> 00:20:14.720
<v Speaker 4>belief in both the perfectibility of man and also in

310
00:20:14.759 --> 00:20:18.000
<v Speaker 4>your personal moral duty to expand that system as far

311
00:20:18.039 --> 00:20:20.640
<v Speaker 4>as possible. Again, it's that same sort of kind of

312
00:20:21.079 --> 00:20:23.000
<v Speaker 4>progressive imperialism mentioned earlier.

313
00:20:26.519 --> 00:20:34.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think two we also kind of forget what

314
00:20:34.359 --> 00:20:40.480
<v Speaker 3>civilization is in these conversations, specifically progressive or I don't know.

315
00:20:40.559 --> 00:20:43.839
<v Speaker 3>It's like if they forget per se, but they had

316
00:20:43.839 --> 00:20:48.519
<v Speaker 3>this idea of civilization as this kind of abstract thing

317
00:20:48.759 --> 00:20:54.200
<v Speaker 3>that exists independent of people. Like institutions have their kind

318
00:20:54.200 --> 00:21:00.240
<v Speaker 3>of like own ontologically independent existence, and it's it's on

319
00:21:00.279 --> 00:21:05.519
<v Speaker 3>the institutions are comprised of people who whom the society

320
00:21:05.640 --> 00:21:09.400
<v Speaker 3>is comprised of institutions or kind of these like standalone

321
00:21:09.519 --> 00:21:17.200
<v Speaker 3>things that exist independent of the society. And to that extent,

322
00:21:17.400 --> 00:21:19.200
<v Speaker 3>like if you've sent that content of the institution to

323
00:21:19.279 --> 00:21:22.160
<v Speaker 3>the civilization is like civilization is just a thing that

324
00:21:22.279 --> 00:21:28.039
<v Speaker 3>exists and people happen to inhabit civilization. Whereas I think

325
00:21:28.319 --> 00:21:30.759
<v Speaker 3>my perspective and probably probably it is probably close to

326
00:21:30.799 --> 00:21:34.480
<v Speaker 3>your perspective, Like civilization is not independent of the people

327
00:21:34.519 --> 00:21:38.559
<v Speaker 3>that comprisee it. Civilization is an extension of the Ethnos.

328
00:21:39.480 --> 00:21:43.000
<v Speaker 3>It's not something that you can interchange. It is mutually

329
00:21:43.039 --> 00:21:47.799
<v Speaker 3>dependent upon the Ethnos. And when we had this kind of.

330
00:21:48.079 --> 00:21:51.440
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, oh well, and this is is Demeister's whole

331
00:21:51.480 --> 00:21:55.559
<v Speaker 4>point right writing about constitutions, where it's like the constitution

332
00:21:55.720 --> 00:21:58.680
<v Speaker 4>does not create a people, it describes a people at

333
00:21:58.680 --> 00:22:01.359
<v Speaker 4>a certain time. It has no power in and of

334
00:22:01.400 --> 00:22:05.920
<v Speaker 4>itself and this idea and exactly what you just mentioned

335
00:22:06.240 --> 00:22:08.359
<v Speaker 4>is why when I very rarely decide to post to

336
00:22:08.400 --> 00:22:13.599
<v Speaker 4>social media on Twitter at least, I very afflic get

337
00:22:13.640 --> 00:22:18.720
<v Speaker 4>into the dumbest arguments in the world with both constitutional conservatives,

338
00:22:19.160 --> 00:22:21.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, for the idea that you know, a constitution

339
00:22:21.319 --> 00:22:25.160
<v Speaker 4>does not have the ability to enforce or create a culture,

340
00:22:25.640 --> 00:22:29.640
<v Speaker 4>which in my mind is demonstrably true. Right does America

341
00:22:29.720 --> 00:22:34.200
<v Speaker 4>look like it did in seventeen seventy seven? I rest

342
00:22:34.240 --> 00:22:38.119
<v Speaker 4>my point, but also right with the an caps who believe,

343
00:22:38.400 --> 00:22:41.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, that no state should be allowed to regulate

344
00:22:41.559 --> 00:22:44.119
<v Speaker 4>you know, who lives in a certain area and simply

345
00:22:44.160 --> 00:22:47.400
<v Speaker 4>culture is not a factor. But at the same time,

346
00:22:47.559 --> 00:22:50.920
<v Speaker 4>right these these even something is as kind of liberal

347
00:22:50.920 --> 00:22:53.720
<v Speaker 4>as the conception of human rights, you know, the rights

348
00:22:53.839 --> 00:22:56.200
<v Speaker 4>enumerated to you, you know, by God or the state,

349
00:22:56.279 --> 00:22:59.519
<v Speaker 4>depending on your view of it. Those are highly cultural.

350
00:23:00.240 --> 00:23:06.599
<v Speaker 4>Those are effectively Anglo conceptions, right. The other cultures do

351
00:23:06.680 --> 00:23:09.599
<v Speaker 4>not conceptualize things in such a way. And sorry, I'll

352
00:23:09.680 --> 00:23:11.000
<v Speaker 4>kick it back to you, but I think that's what

353
00:23:11.160 --> 00:23:15.720
<v Speaker 4>makes Demeaster's work so interesting is because he is addressing

354
00:23:15.720 --> 00:23:18.640
<v Speaker 4>that very very early, right, you know, briefly after the revolution,

355
00:23:18.799 --> 00:23:22.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, the idea that you can create a sort

356
00:23:22.480 --> 00:23:26.039
<v Speaker 4>of formalized description or a set of rules that will

357
00:23:26.920 --> 00:23:30.880
<v Speaker 4>guide culture. And clearly that doesn't work. But excuse me,

358
00:23:30.920 --> 00:23:33.400
<v Speaker 4>I interrupted you.

359
00:23:33.480 --> 00:23:36.799
<v Speaker 3>And this kind of like goes back to the classical

360
00:23:36.839 --> 00:23:42.480
<v Speaker 3>liberal idea, well, let's say the small government conservative Like

361
00:23:42.839 --> 00:23:45.920
<v Speaker 3>the kind of point they're failing to understand is that

362
00:23:46.039 --> 00:23:51.039
<v Speaker 3>small government is only possible when you have authoritarian government

363
00:23:51.319 --> 00:23:55.799
<v Speaker 3>on the borders, on the edges of society. Like I

364
00:23:55.799 --> 00:23:58.039
<v Speaker 3>like to think about as like let's say, hard and

365
00:23:58.160 --> 00:24:02.039
<v Speaker 3>stern strictures facing the outside and a more kind of

366
00:24:02.200 --> 00:24:06.519
<v Speaker 3>soft a soft belly. And we we kind of have

367
00:24:06.680 --> 00:24:08.599
<v Speaker 3>this concept in the Orthodox Church with it where it's

368
00:24:08.640 --> 00:24:11.960
<v Speaker 3>called like economia, where the priest has leave to kind

369
00:24:12.039 --> 00:24:17.039
<v Speaker 3>of grant you, let's say a little bit of latitude

370
00:24:17.079 --> 00:24:21.240
<v Speaker 3>on certain things, given the circumstances of your situation. And

371
00:24:22.599 --> 00:24:26.559
<v Speaker 3>I think that that that concept is applicable to civilization.

372
00:24:26.839 --> 00:24:31.880
<v Speaker 3>But it's only and that like basically libertarianism on the

373
00:24:31.920 --> 00:24:37.160
<v Speaker 3>in on the inside of society, whereas a hard shell

374
00:24:37.319 --> 00:24:40.880
<v Speaker 3>facing the outside of society, that type of like kind

375
00:24:40.880 --> 00:24:45.079
<v Speaker 3>of free market, free association where you kind of let

376
00:24:45.440 --> 00:24:49.559
<v Speaker 3>let society run on its own substrates is only possible

377
00:24:49.680 --> 00:24:53.279
<v Speaker 3>if you maintain the integrity of the society from the

378
00:24:53.319 --> 00:24:55.039
<v Speaker 3>inside facing the outside.

379
00:24:56.559 --> 00:24:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Well.

380
00:24:56.799 --> 00:25:02.599
<v Speaker 4>And it's sort of based in uh a similar a

381
00:25:02.640 --> 00:25:08.119
<v Speaker 4>similar myth, the idea of the neutral institution. You know

382
00:25:08.160 --> 00:25:11.720
<v Speaker 4>that an institution, whether it's the judiciary or you know, education,

383
00:25:11.880 --> 00:25:16.200
<v Speaker 4>whichever can deal with can deal with everyone fairly, that

384
00:25:16.240 --> 00:25:20.119
<v Speaker 4>it has no I guess a negative way to say it,

385
00:25:20.160 --> 00:25:23.559
<v Speaker 4>but it has no sort of bias or prejudice built

386
00:25:23.680 --> 00:25:27.880
<v Speaker 4>into it. Clearly that is is not the case. And

387
00:25:28.079 --> 00:25:31.319
<v Speaker 4>you know, as regards this kind of mix of you know,

388
00:25:31.359 --> 00:25:36.079
<v Speaker 4>authoritarian and libertarianism, it's like, well, to be honest, it's

389
00:25:36.119 --> 00:25:39.079
<v Speaker 4>it's freedom to do what because you know, even when

390
00:25:39.119 --> 00:25:42.599
<v Speaker 4>you look at the constitutional conservative types they hold up

391
00:25:43.079 --> 00:25:45.039
<v Speaker 4>you know, the era of the American founding, the kind

392
00:25:45.039 --> 00:25:47.519
<v Speaker 4>of first American republic or if they don't know a

393
00:25:47.519 --> 00:25:49.440
<v Speaker 4>whole lot about history, kind of the first and second

394
00:25:49.519 --> 00:25:52.559
<v Speaker 4>you know, pre Lincoln as this example of you know,

395
00:25:52.599 --> 00:25:55.480
<v Speaker 4>maximal freedom. And it's like, well, well, sure like from

396
00:25:55.480 --> 00:25:57.079
<v Speaker 4>a certain perspective, you have quite a lot of freedom.

397
00:25:57.119 --> 00:25:58.599
<v Speaker 4>You don't really have to pay a lot in taxes.

398
00:25:59.240 --> 00:26:01.480
<v Speaker 4>You know, no one can say, you know, no one

399
00:26:01.480 --> 00:26:04.799
<v Speaker 4>can tell you not to you know, drop gamer words

400
00:26:04.960 --> 00:26:09.240
<v Speaker 4>or you know where you can live. But at the

401
00:26:09.279 --> 00:26:13.640
<v Speaker 4>same time, like your other forms of kind of modern

402
00:26:13.640 --> 00:26:18.559
<v Speaker 4>freedoms are radically restricted. You have George Washington, for example,

403
00:26:18.680 --> 00:26:22.079
<v Speaker 4>you know, executing soldiers for sodomy. There were blasphemy laws.

404
00:26:22.680 --> 00:26:25.359
<v Speaker 4>You know, if you slept with another man's wife, you

405
00:26:25.440 --> 00:26:27.160
<v Speaker 4>might well end up in a duel and get shot

406
00:26:27.599 --> 00:26:31.599
<v Speaker 4>or lynched. So again, right, it is freedom to do

407
00:26:31.759 --> 00:26:36.200
<v Speaker 4>what and that is highly cultural, culturally contextual, and also

408
00:26:36.319 --> 00:26:41.799
<v Speaker 4>that depends on a certain certain common cultural understanding of

409
00:26:41.839 --> 00:26:46.319
<v Speaker 4>what is and is not acceptable. And in a multicultural society,

410
00:26:46.599 --> 00:26:48.119
<v Speaker 4>like there's a reason that you know when you can

411
00:26:48.119 --> 00:26:51.559
<v Speaker 4>look at Aristotle, right, this leads to tyranny because there

412
00:26:51.599 --> 00:26:56.640
<v Speaker 4>is no common cultural understanding for that small l libertarian

413
00:26:56.640 --> 00:27:00.880
<v Speaker 4>amount of social freedom. And again I'll reference them twice,

414
00:27:00.920 --> 00:27:04.799
<v Speaker 4>which will said chatting to just an absolute fit of

415
00:27:04.880 --> 00:27:07.640
<v Speaker 4>rage is mold Budd makes this exact point where he

416
00:27:07.640 --> 00:27:11.319
<v Speaker 4>talks about speaking to libertarians, where he says, you know,

417
00:27:11.440 --> 00:27:13.839
<v Speaker 4>the libertarian's mistake is he thinks that he can bring

418
00:27:13.880 --> 00:27:17.039
<v Speaker 4>about and capistan by acting as if it were already

419
00:27:17.079 --> 00:27:20.720
<v Speaker 4>the case, by acting as sort of an agorist, and

420
00:27:20.920 --> 00:27:24.200
<v Speaker 4>his point is, no, if you were a libertarian in

421
00:27:24.279 --> 00:27:26.720
<v Speaker 4>the current moment, you should be a fascist. You know,

422
00:27:26.839 --> 00:27:29.680
<v Speaker 4>you should advocate for, you know, the harshest police state

423
00:27:29.720 --> 00:27:32.720
<v Speaker 4>in the world, because you know, once you have that,

424
00:27:32.839 --> 00:27:35.039
<v Speaker 4>once you have that, you know, that perfect security, that

425
00:27:35.119 --> 00:27:39.680
<v Speaker 4>perfect you know, assurance of punishment of wrongdoers, then that

426
00:27:39.759 --> 00:27:43.960
<v Speaker 4>spontaneous order quote unquote can occur, but does not come

427
00:27:44.079 --> 00:27:47.720
<v Speaker 4>out of Somalia. You know, it does not come out

428
00:27:47.839 --> 00:27:53.119
<v Speaker 4>of you know, a lawless, decentralized society. It's plainly not

429
00:27:53.240 --> 00:27:58.279
<v Speaker 4>the case. And so hey, we we've been been talking

430
00:27:58.319 --> 00:28:02.599
<v Speaker 4>a lot about these of critiques of liberalism, these critiques

431
00:28:02.599 --> 00:28:06.240
<v Speaker 4>of progressive liberalism, and one of the things that I

432
00:28:06.359 --> 00:28:10.960
<v Speaker 4>can't stop talking about is many of these defenders of

433
00:28:11.240 --> 00:28:14.400
<v Speaker 4>liberalism look at that, look at that attack on the

434
00:28:14.440 --> 00:28:18.279
<v Speaker 4>idea of neutral institutions, look at that, attacks on ideas

435
00:28:18.319 --> 00:28:23.480
<v Speaker 4>of secularism, and they say, well, that's exactly what that,

436
00:28:23.960 --> 00:28:29.160
<v Speaker 4>in scare quotes woke left does. Therefore, because you criticize liberalism,

437
00:28:29.440 --> 00:28:33.480
<v Speaker 4>you are woke. Therefore the woke right is born a

438
00:28:33.640 --> 00:28:37.359
<v Speaker 4>subject I cannot stop writing long articles on. So I

439
00:28:37.440 --> 00:28:39.559
<v Speaker 4>assume everyone listening to this is sick to hear me

440
00:28:39.680 --> 00:28:42.000
<v Speaker 4>talk about it, but I'm curious to get your thoughts

441
00:28:42.000 --> 00:28:42.960
<v Speaker 4>on that term.

442
00:28:43.680 --> 00:28:49.000
<v Speaker 3>It's just beyond idiotic and I have negative patience for

443
00:28:50.440 --> 00:28:57.480
<v Speaker 3>this type of attempt to shoehorn, say right wingers outside

444
00:28:57.519 --> 00:29:02.079
<v Speaker 3>of that classic libertarian conventional oh sorry, classical liberal conventional

445
00:29:02.119 --> 00:29:08.079
<v Speaker 3>libertarian motive politics, because it's kind of like you said,

446
00:29:08.119 --> 00:29:13.400
<v Speaker 3>in terms of like the and caps they treat they

447
00:29:13.440 --> 00:29:17.880
<v Speaker 3>try to precipitate and capistan by treating it, treating society

448
00:29:17.920 --> 00:29:21.160
<v Speaker 3>as if it were already in Capistan. Classical liberals and

449
00:29:21.240 --> 00:29:26.759
<v Speaker 3>libertarians they want to implement their policies as society exists,

450
00:29:27.319 --> 00:29:31.599
<v Speaker 3>and that requires this having this kind of platonic ideal

451
00:29:32.240 --> 00:29:36.039
<v Speaker 3>of what society currently is and then pretending as if

452
00:29:36.079 --> 00:29:41.240
<v Speaker 3>that's the actual way it is. And so the classical

453
00:29:41.279 --> 00:29:44.960
<v Speaker 3>liberals they deny this, but they still operate on the

454
00:29:45.000 --> 00:29:49.240
<v Speaker 3>basis of this kind of blank slatism, this type of

455
00:29:49.960 --> 00:29:56.319
<v Speaker 3>almost like dialectical evolution of society where we're all poor,

456
00:29:56.480 --> 00:30:02.400
<v Speaker 3>we're all pulled towards this ultimate constitution idea, and if anything,

457
00:30:04.240 --> 00:30:07.680
<v Speaker 3>whenever we stray from that idea, that's because that's not

458
00:30:07.720 --> 00:30:11.279
<v Speaker 3>because of the actual society or constitution itself. That's just

459
00:30:11.319 --> 00:30:14.400
<v Speaker 3>because that's just how it works. That's just a temporary setback,

460
00:30:14.440 --> 00:30:17.319
<v Speaker 3>and we cannot lose faith in the ultimate project. And

461
00:30:17.319 --> 00:30:19.440
<v Speaker 3>and it's about to be this kind of this kind

462
00:30:19.480 --> 00:30:25.319
<v Speaker 3>of like self referential, self referential idea where like great

463
00:30:25.400 --> 00:30:29.920
<v Speaker 3>real classical liberalism hasn't been tried, like it's the ideal

464
00:30:29.960 --> 00:30:34.480
<v Speaker 3>project hasn't been achieved. But they and they and they

465
00:30:34.480 --> 00:30:36.440
<v Speaker 3>point to this era of society. I don't even really

466
00:30:36.480 --> 00:30:39.880
<v Speaker 3>know what area era of society they American society they

467
00:30:39.920 --> 00:30:43.440
<v Speaker 3>point to to kind of justify this point. It's always

468
00:30:43.519 --> 00:30:45.880
<v Speaker 3>kind of some ambiguous pleading to the founders or the

469
00:30:45.920 --> 00:30:49.599
<v Speaker 3>Federal's papers. But then you have you have other founders

470
00:30:49.640 --> 00:30:55.680
<v Speaker 3>who directly refute their kind of concept that of American

471
00:30:55.759 --> 00:31:00.519
<v Speaker 3>society is this kind of uh, let's say, put potentially

472
00:31:00.640 --> 00:31:05.240
<v Speaker 3>multicultural like utopia. I can't remember. I think it was

473
00:31:05.279 --> 00:31:11.720
<v Speaker 3>I think it was James Monroe who who it was

474
00:31:11.759 --> 00:31:13.599
<v Speaker 3>it was to Toke Folle and then James Monroe who

475
00:31:13.640 --> 00:31:20.240
<v Speaker 3>were speaking of the constitution specifically for white Anglo Saxon Protestants.

476
00:31:20.720 --> 00:31:23.759
<v Speaker 3>And then so it's this like degree of cherry picking,

477
00:31:24.519 --> 00:31:27.000
<v Speaker 3>trade picking. The founders they want to idolize, and then

478
00:31:27.039 --> 00:31:30.079
<v Speaker 3>even then what words of the founders they want to idolize.

479
00:31:30.200 --> 00:31:33.960
<v Speaker 3>And it's absolutely a deification of the founding. Right in

480
00:31:34.079 --> 00:31:37.160
<v Speaker 3>order in order to have this type of fealty to

481
00:31:37.240 --> 00:31:40.279
<v Speaker 3>this classical liberal idea, you have to you have to

482
00:31:40.440 --> 00:31:43.240
<v Speaker 3>you have to kind of elevate the Constitution to a

483
00:31:43.319 --> 00:31:47.759
<v Speaker 3>sacred document one and two, you have to deify the founders.

484
00:31:48.240 --> 00:31:53.960
<v Speaker 3>The Constitution and its processional nature is therefore infallible. The

485
00:31:54.200 --> 00:31:59.519
<v Speaker 3>Constitutional conventions are comparable to the Nicean Councils. They're given

486
00:31:59.559 --> 00:32:03.000
<v Speaker 3>this staff of infallibility. It is the American founding myth.

487
00:32:03.279 --> 00:32:06.119
<v Speaker 3>And if you call that into question, that all of

488
00:32:06.119 --> 00:32:09.000
<v Speaker 3>a sudden that you are a heretic. And that's how

489
00:32:09.000 --> 00:32:13.279
<v Speaker 3>they treat you, like the woke word, attaching woke to

490
00:32:13.440 --> 00:32:16.880
<v Speaker 3>these kind of like political categories, all that is a

491
00:32:16.960 --> 00:32:22.839
<v Speaker 3>synonym for you've committed a heresy. And obviously some heretics

492
00:32:22.839 --> 00:32:27.119
<v Speaker 3>are worse than others, are more destructive, but they're effectively

493
00:32:27.200 --> 00:32:31.319
<v Speaker 3>tranching anyone with the woke label as an equally destructive

494
00:32:31.359 --> 00:32:35.680
<v Speaker 3>heretic and making no distinction between quote unquote heresies.

495
00:32:37.119 --> 00:32:40.519
<v Speaker 4>Well, and the thing that bothers me about this is

496
00:32:40.559 --> 00:32:46.880
<v Speaker 4>that they're not even and this was proven by Joel

497
00:32:46.880 --> 00:32:49.920
<v Speaker 4>Berry's I think it was Joel Berry. I didn't watch it.

498
00:32:50.119 --> 00:32:53.519
<v Speaker 4>I can't listen to him debate with Dave Green, the

499
00:32:53.519 --> 00:32:58.599
<v Speaker 4>distributist or. Dave Green asked him a very simple question, right,

500
00:32:58.920 --> 00:33:02.440
<v Speaker 4>is Thomas Jeffers and racist? Because you know, if you're

501
00:33:02.440 --> 00:33:05.319
<v Speaker 4>an adult about it, regardless of your opinion on Thomas Jefferson,

502
00:33:05.359 --> 00:33:09.519
<v Speaker 4>you can say, well, yes, probably by the standards of

503
00:33:09.519 --> 00:33:13.440
<v Speaker 4>our time. But you know, I don't view that as

504
00:33:13.680 --> 00:33:16.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, affecting other things we could or couldn't take

505
00:33:16.039 --> 00:33:19.359
<v Speaker 4>from it. You know, it's not a sainted figure. You're

506
00:33:19.400 --> 00:33:22.279
<v Speaker 4>simply a man, a cringe atheist, but you know, impressive

507
00:33:22.279 --> 00:33:28.359
<v Speaker 4>in other ways. But the reason that the constitutional conservative

508
00:33:28.400 --> 00:33:33.799
<v Speaker 4>position is especially ridiculous is that they truly are the

509
00:33:33.839 --> 00:33:39.440
<v Speaker 4>progressives of yesteryear, and so they have to hold that,

510
00:33:39.880 --> 00:33:43.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, simultaneously, are all of these founders sainted figures?

511
00:33:43.480 --> 00:33:48.119
<v Speaker 4>But also they were so ahead of their time they

512
00:33:48.119 --> 00:33:50.720
<v Speaker 4>could see into the future, and what they actually meant

513
00:33:51.039 --> 00:33:54.880
<v Speaker 4>was something in between, you know, kind of like Ronald

514
00:33:54.880 --> 00:33:58.359
<v Speaker 4>Reagan and you know Bill Clinton's Democratic Party platform. That's

515
00:33:58.359 --> 00:34:01.240
<v Speaker 4>what they really meant. It's this idea that because they

516
00:34:01.240 --> 00:34:03.839
<v Speaker 4>are infallible, and this is what I think they must

517
00:34:04.119 --> 00:34:07.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, have all along, you've been in accordance with

518
00:34:07.599 --> 00:34:12.199
<v Speaker 4>exactly what I think. And the progressive types run rings

519
00:34:12.199 --> 00:34:17.280
<v Speaker 4>about them on this issue because it's it's plainly clear

520
00:34:17.840 --> 00:34:21.119
<v Speaker 4>by again the standards of the modern left that all

521
00:34:21.159 --> 00:34:25.280
<v Speaker 4>these men were horrifically racist, again in scare quotes, by

522
00:34:25.320 --> 00:34:30.679
<v Speaker 4>the standards of the day. But it's because of simultaneously

523
00:34:30.719 --> 00:34:33.400
<v Speaker 4>that kind of like deification where they must be perfect,

524
00:34:33.480 --> 00:34:39.840
<v Speaker 4>and also the problem of deep down effectively just being progressive.

525
00:34:40.280 --> 00:34:43.599
<v Speaker 4>And so in a way i'd almost I wouldn't agree

526
00:34:43.639 --> 00:34:46.519
<v Speaker 4>with it, but I almost respect the position more if

527
00:34:46.559 --> 00:34:51.119
<v Speaker 4>it were. Yes, they were, and it's awesome. You know,

528
00:34:51.159 --> 00:34:54.599
<v Speaker 4>I want to literally, to quote Alex Jones, you know,

529
00:34:54.639 --> 00:34:58.000
<v Speaker 4>seventeen seventy six will commence again, warts and all. But

530
00:34:58.079 --> 00:34:59.920
<v Speaker 4>it's not that, you know, it's this sort of ten

531
00:35:00.000 --> 00:35:03.639
<v Speaker 4>tactical invocation where you know, it is sort of bringing

532
00:35:03.679 --> 00:35:10.159
<v Speaker 4>these figures kind of like we're casting yourself as a

533
00:35:10.280 --> 00:35:13.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, strict constitutionalist doing exactly what you know, the

534
00:35:13.360 --> 00:35:17.519
<v Speaker 4>sounding document said, while also kind of twisting them to

535
00:35:17.599 --> 00:35:22.199
<v Speaker 4>meet modern standards. I am, you know, a Protestant, albeit

536
00:35:22.559 --> 00:35:26.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, not a particularly uh when you read enough

537
00:35:26.320 --> 00:35:28.239
<v Speaker 4>to meister right, it kind of throws you for a loop.

538
00:35:28.719 --> 00:35:32.440
<v Speaker 4>But to me it reminds me very much of the

539
00:35:32.480 --> 00:35:38.199
<v Speaker 4>Catholic critiques of Soul's scriptura, the idea that you know,

540
00:35:39.239 --> 00:35:42.360
<v Speaker 4>scripture is you know, entirely preminent. You know, it's this

541
00:35:42.400 --> 00:35:46.199
<v Speaker 4>for this literalist interpretation, because you see a sort of

542
00:35:46.199 --> 00:35:52.599
<v Speaker 4>echo in that in the you know, constitutional liter literalists.

543
00:35:52.639 --> 00:35:57.400
<v Speaker 4>Excuse me, it's light here, and in both cases, I

544
00:35:57.400 --> 00:35:59.400
<v Speaker 4>maybe I shouldn't say that, but I in both of

545
00:35:59.440 --> 00:36:02.280
<v Speaker 4>those I see a certain degree of cope because again,

546
00:36:03.440 --> 00:36:05.239
<v Speaker 4>as we see both, you know, in the example of

547
00:36:05.239 --> 00:36:08.800
<v Speaker 4>scripture and in law, what matters is not what's written

548
00:36:08.800 --> 00:36:11.760
<v Speaker 4>on the page. What matters is who interprets it right,

549
00:36:11.800 --> 00:36:15.840
<v Speaker 4>And that becomes the Schmidtian question, right, who decides? And

550
00:36:15.920 --> 00:36:18.239
<v Speaker 4>so to me, that's what one of the many things

551
00:36:18.280 --> 00:36:20.960
<v Speaker 4>I find frustrating is about these you know, constitutional conservative

552
00:36:20.960 --> 00:36:24.880
<v Speaker 4>types that we could consider, you know, their their ancestors

553
00:36:24.880 --> 00:36:27.800
<v Speaker 4>to be right, or their predecessors to be successors, excuse me,

554
00:36:28.079 --> 00:36:30.519
<v Speaker 4>to be the sort of you know, good classical liberals,

555
00:36:30.599 --> 00:36:33.719
<v Speaker 4>the IDW types who still kind of run around. But

556
00:36:34.960 --> 00:36:41.559
<v Speaker 4>ultimately there is that law right, that that fundamental misunderstanding

557
00:36:41.719 --> 00:36:45.519
<v Speaker 4>that you know, the law as written actually matters, and

558
00:36:46.559 --> 00:36:48.280
<v Speaker 4>I think that there is a theological route to that,

559
00:36:48.320 --> 00:36:49.199
<v Speaker 4>but I'll kick it back to you.

560
00:36:50.079 --> 00:36:54.199
<v Speaker 3>I will add one of one of the hilarious things

561
00:36:54.280 --> 00:37:00.760
<v Speaker 3>about constitutional conservatives in our quotes is often very they

562
00:37:01.280 --> 00:37:06.400
<v Speaker 3>like to call themselves a originalist originalists. There's a couple

563
00:37:06.400 --> 00:37:12.880
<v Speaker 3>of different schools the constitutional interpretation. There's originalism, purposivism, and textualism. Right,

564
00:37:13.039 --> 00:37:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Anton Scalia was a different different Conservative judges of the

565
00:37:18.039 --> 00:37:21.199
<v Speaker 3>Court like, they typically plead to the thing called originalism,

566
00:37:21.679 --> 00:37:25.760
<v Speaker 3>where it's like interpreting the Constitution from the lens of

567
00:37:25.840 --> 00:37:29.079
<v Speaker 3>the founder, or the lens in the perspective or the

568
00:37:29.199 --> 00:37:32.320
<v Speaker 3>historical president of the time that was originally written in

569
00:37:33.079 --> 00:37:37.000
<v Speaker 3>And so these makes the kind of jewel berrys joel

570
00:37:37.000 --> 00:37:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Berry's retort to the distributists even more interesting and kind

571
00:37:42.039 --> 00:37:48.440
<v Speaker 3>of incoherent, because if you actually look at the perspectives

572
00:37:48.639 --> 00:37:51.679
<v Speaker 3>of the founders at the time that the Constitution was written,

573
00:37:52.119 --> 00:37:56.400
<v Speaker 3>and we interpret the Constitution from that lens, what do

574
00:37:56.559 --> 00:38:00.800
<v Speaker 3>we think the new kind of prevailing sets of precedent

575
00:38:01.119 --> 00:38:05.320
<v Speaker 3>would be if we were actually originalist, Well, there would

576
00:38:05.400 --> 00:38:08.719
<v Speaker 3>be no civil rights framework, there would be there would

577
00:38:08.719 --> 00:38:11.519
<v Speaker 3>be none of this kind of this kind of progressive

578
00:38:13.679 --> 00:38:17.159
<v Speaker 3>what have you read into the Constitution. And so it's

579
00:38:17.199 --> 00:38:19.400
<v Speaker 3>like by the very fact that you can have and

580
00:38:19.440 --> 00:38:24.599
<v Speaker 3>this is kind of Socrates. By Socrates preferred the spoken

581
00:38:24.639 --> 00:38:28.280
<v Speaker 3>word the written word. When things get put into writing,

582
00:38:28.800 --> 00:38:34.400
<v Speaker 3>there is a effectively a barrier between the person writing

583
00:38:34.400 --> 00:38:38.559
<v Speaker 3>and the person reading it. And you can interpret interpret

584
00:38:38.599 --> 00:38:41.079
<v Speaker 3>the same sentence and obviously how many different ways. And

585
00:38:41.119 --> 00:38:45.800
<v Speaker 3>that's effectively how how the judiciary works. You can read

586
00:38:46.119 --> 00:38:50.719
<v Speaker 3>almost anything you want that's politically expedient into the Constitution.

587
00:38:51.400 --> 00:38:53.639
<v Speaker 3>You can try to put bounds on it by these

588
00:38:53.639 --> 00:38:58.039
<v Speaker 3>different interpretive schools, but effectively you're still just doing the

589
00:38:58.079 --> 00:39:01.679
<v Speaker 3>same thing because any like and this is kind of

590
00:39:01.719 --> 00:39:06.599
<v Speaker 3>like the problem with doing quote unquote history even from

591
00:39:06.639 --> 00:39:10.639
<v Speaker 3>an originalist interpretation, you're still a modern person trying to

592
00:39:10.800 --> 00:39:15.599
<v Speaker 3>understand the historical context of the founders, and so therefore

593
00:39:15.639 --> 00:39:20.440
<v Speaker 3>you are still there's still multiple points of mediation, like

594
00:39:20.840 --> 00:39:23.440
<v Speaker 3>or points of distance, points of error between you and

595
00:39:23.480 --> 00:39:26.039
<v Speaker 3>the founders. And so this type of this entire type

596
00:39:26.079 --> 00:39:30.199
<v Speaker 3>of frame that the Constitution works as long as we

597
00:39:31.119 --> 00:39:34.000
<v Speaker 3>as long as we defer back to the Founders is

598
00:39:34.360 --> 00:39:38.719
<v Speaker 3>ridiculous on its face, and it's it's incoherent because it's like, sure,

599
00:39:38.960 --> 00:39:41.440
<v Speaker 3>we can extrapolate the mentalities of the Founders, but there's

600
00:39:41.440 --> 00:39:44.079
<v Speaker 3>many Founders and they came from many different schools of thought.

601
00:39:44.360 --> 00:39:48.400
<v Speaker 3>So it's what motivation behind the Constitution, even from an

602
00:39:48.400 --> 00:39:52.000
<v Speaker 3>originalist perspective, are we pursuing? And so this is the

603
00:39:52.079 --> 00:39:56.800
<v Speaker 3>entire problem with this deification of the Constitution. The Constitution

604
00:39:57.400 --> 00:40:02.320
<v Speaker 3>it has to run on a substrate, and that substrate

605
00:40:02.400 --> 00:40:05.079
<v Speaker 3>is the people itself. And so when you had this

606
00:40:05.159 --> 00:40:08.239
<v Speaker 3>idea that like, and I've seen Joe Barry tweet that

607
00:40:09.360 --> 00:40:11.599
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember off off the top of my head,

608
00:40:11.599 --> 00:40:15.239
<v Speaker 3>but it was like, it'd be preferential to have like

609
00:40:15.400 --> 00:40:22.000
<v Speaker 3>browns compared to the woke, right. I cannot remember the quote,

610
00:40:22.039 --> 00:40:25.159
<v Speaker 3>but that was the general sentiment I remember, And it's like, okay,

611
00:40:25.199 --> 00:40:28.320
<v Speaker 3>so then you don't actually respect like the milieu of

612
00:40:28.360 --> 00:40:31.679
<v Speaker 3>the founders because that would have been incomprehensible to the founders.

613
00:40:32.000 --> 00:40:37.039
<v Speaker 3>But even being I believe it was Monroe or Madison,

614
00:40:37.119 --> 00:40:40.519
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember, but I remember like reading this quote

615
00:40:40.679 --> 00:40:43.800
<v Speaker 3>from one of the founders that was effectively like it

616
00:40:43.880 --> 00:40:47.639
<v Speaker 3>is entirely possible that we will have a Mohammedan as

617
00:40:47.679 --> 00:40:50.960
<v Speaker 3>president of the United States, and he expresses of woe

618
00:40:51.079 --> 00:40:53.519
<v Speaker 3>the day that occurs. But within this framework, that is

619
00:40:53.639 --> 00:40:58.199
<v Speaker 3>entirely possible. So it was not a foregone conclusion when

620
00:40:58.280 --> 00:41:03.039
<v Speaker 3>the Framers wrote the Institution that this our current situation

621
00:41:03.239 --> 00:41:05.880
<v Speaker 3>was a possibility. In fact, it was thrown out there

622
00:41:05.880 --> 00:41:11.440
<v Speaker 3>as a possibility. And so like from that perspective, your

623
00:41:11.559 --> 00:41:14.360
<v Speaker 3>view of the Constitution as a success or a failure

624
00:41:14.840 --> 00:41:18.480
<v Speaker 3>just depends on your ability to reckon with the acceptability

625
00:41:18.559 --> 00:41:23.440
<v Speaker 3>of being replaced or being subjucated, subjugated by by foreign cultures,

626
00:41:23.480 --> 00:41:27.360
<v Speaker 3>foreign peoples in your own nation, do you have such

627
00:41:27.440 --> 00:41:29.840
<v Speaker 3>little legions to your nation or culture that that is

628
00:41:29.880 --> 00:41:34.119
<v Speaker 3>an acceptable proposition? And for people and for constitual conservatives,

629
00:41:34.320 --> 00:41:37.519
<v Speaker 3>people like Joe Berry, if they are truly originalist or

630
00:41:37.559 --> 00:41:40.199
<v Speaker 3>they are truly differing back to the Founders, it must

631
00:41:40.280 --> 00:41:43.960
<v Speaker 3>be an acceptable proposition because that is what the founders

632
00:41:44.039 --> 00:41:49.159
<v Speaker 3>viewed as a potential, inevitable and evitability of the document

633
00:41:49.239 --> 00:41:50.199
<v Speaker 3>that they created.

634
00:41:52.639 --> 00:41:55.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, and one of the things that I think is interesting,

635
00:41:56.199 --> 00:42:01.880
<v Speaker 4>and this kind of dovetails with your recent kind of

636
00:42:01.880 --> 00:42:07.199
<v Speaker 4>Twitter posting about student debt, but also with a lot

637
00:42:07.199 --> 00:42:10.800
<v Speaker 4>of the data I'm seeing from Mark Mitchell at Resmusen

638
00:42:10.920 --> 00:42:16.880
<v Speaker 4>about specifically Generation Z is that the sort of pre

639
00:42:16.960 --> 00:42:21.480
<v Speaker 4>existing political theology is completely and totally dead. It was

640
00:42:21.519 --> 00:42:24.840
<v Speaker 4>sort of, you know, gradually losing steam. The state religion

641
00:42:25.079 --> 00:42:29.320
<v Speaker 4>was no longer able to produce political miracles anymore. And

642
00:42:29.360 --> 00:42:32.440
<v Speaker 4>so you know, there's several subsequent generations who believed in

643
00:42:32.519 --> 00:42:35.159
<v Speaker 4>it less, you know, they didn't hold to the same

644
00:42:35.239 --> 00:42:41.360
<v Speaker 4>kind of sacred strictures of you know, impartiality or into

645
00:42:41.360 --> 00:42:44.199
<v Speaker 4>the belief in you know, the rule of law, democratic norms.

646
00:42:44.280 --> 00:42:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Right as someone might say, because to be perfectly honest,

647
00:42:50.159 --> 00:42:53.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't actually care about the Constitution one way or

648
00:42:53.840 --> 00:42:55.719
<v Speaker 4>the other. Right, there's stuff and I like their stuff,

649
00:42:55.719 --> 00:42:59.679
<v Speaker 4>and I don't. And when it helps me, right, when

650
00:42:59.719 --> 00:43:03.880
<v Speaker 4>there's court case going and you know, a strict literalist

651
00:43:03.920 --> 00:43:08.000
<v Speaker 4>interpretation of the Constitution gets me what I want, then great.

652
00:43:08.599 --> 00:43:12.840
<v Speaker 4>If not, who cares? And what Mitchell has done it

653
00:43:12.960 --> 00:43:16.280
<v Speaker 4>Resmussen is basically go through and ask people in our

654
00:43:16.400 --> 00:43:20.920
<v Speaker 4>rough age demographic number of questions and basically he's found

655
00:43:20.920 --> 00:43:24.119
<v Speaker 4>that it's like almost sixty percent that basically want a

656
00:43:24.159 --> 00:43:27.119
<v Speaker 4>dictator and look like I'm not a populist. You know,

657
00:43:27.159 --> 00:43:30.199
<v Speaker 4>I don't believe that there's some magic significance in a

658
00:43:30.239 --> 00:43:32.360
<v Speaker 4>lot of people wanting something, but I think it is

659
00:43:32.400 --> 00:43:37.519
<v Speaker 4>an interesting sort of trailing indicator of the decline of

660
00:43:38.679 --> 00:43:42.400
<v Speaker 4>liberalism per se, right, the decline of the belief in

661
00:43:42.440 --> 00:43:45.760
<v Speaker 4>these institutions, the belief in you know, these sort of

662
00:43:46.320 --> 00:43:49.639
<v Speaker 4>kind of lies that we've laid out earlier. And you know,

663
00:43:49.679 --> 00:43:52.360
<v Speaker 4>among that sixty percent, and who knows, I might be

664
00:43:52.400 --> 00:43:55.119
<v Speaker 4>wrong on that number. I saw it on Twitter several

665
00:43:55.199 --> 00:43:58.719
<v Speaker 4>days ago, so forgive me on that. But I'm not

666
00:43:58.880 --> 00:44:00.840
<v Speaker 4>naive enough to assume that you know, every one of

667
00:44:00.880 --> 00:44:03.840
<v Speaker 4>those people is you know, reading through their you know,

668
00:44:03.880 --> 00:44:06.079
<v Speaker 4>the kind of required reading list of you know, right

669
00:44:06.079 --> 00:44:09.440
<v Speaker 4>wing reactionaries. Not at all. But I do think, you know,

670
00:44:09.519 --> 00:44:14.639
<v Speaker 4>you see a sort of a political belief already dead,

671
00:44:14.880 --> 00:44:17.480
<v Speaker 4>kind of dead on its feet, because you know, ultimately

672
00:44:17.480 --> 00:44:20.079
<v Speaker 4>all these things we're talking about, like that that phrasing

673
00:44:20.280 --> 00:44:24.519
<v Speaker 4>of the woke right is basically everyone who isn't a

674
00:44:24.599 --> 00:44:29.920
<v Speaker 4>liberal is woke. But that basically just means everyone, and

675
00:44:30.000 --> 00:44:33.280
<v Speaker 4>so effectively, the only people who still believe in that

676
00:44:33.360 --> 00:44:39.559
<v Speaker 4>system like fully and truly are effectively like loser conservatives

677
00:44:40.320 --> 00:44:41.639
<v Speaker 4>if you see what I'm getting at there.

678
00:44:44.280 --> 00:44:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think, I think in terms of people, I

679
00:44:51.000 --> 00:44:53.639
<v Speaker 3>believe the number was fifty seven percent. I saw that.

680
00:44:53.719 --> 00:44:54.719
<v Speaker 3>I saw that as well.

681
00:44:55.320 --> 00:44:58.039
<v Speaker 4>Okay, three percent off as far as my ability to

682
00:44:58.119 --> 00:44:59.920
<v Speaker 4>remember stats, not too bad.

683
00:45:01.519 --> 00:45:06.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I was. I was very surprised. Like I'm partial,

684
00:45:06.159 --> 00:45:12.239
<v Speaker 3>Like so I'm partial to monarchy as a system. I haven't.

685
00:45:13.239 --> 00:45:16.880
<v Speaker 3>I've thought through a lot of different ideal systems, and

686
00:45:17.000 --> 00:45:20.679
<v Speaker 3>I kind of from my position, let's say, in history,

687
00:45:21.280 --> 00:45:25.519
<v Speaker 3>I have a hard time envisioning the United States transitioning

688
00:45:26.199 --> 00:45:31.800
<v Speaker 3>to anything other than liberalism, just because liberalism in the

689
00:45:31.920 --> 00:45:35.920
<v Speaker 3>United States has worked so long and it has made

690
00:45:36.000 --> 00:45:38.840
<v Speaker 3>us a global superpower. And so just from a pragmatic,

691
00:45:39.559 --> 00:45:44.119
<v Speaker 3>like power based perspective, liberalism has put us on top.

692
00:45:44.599 --> 00:45:47.960
<v Speaker 3>But at what costs, And that cost is kind of

693
00:45:48.000 --> 00:45:54.119
<v Speaker 3>this this cultural and historical sense of identity, sense of place,

694
00:45:54.239 --> 00:45:57.840
<v Speaker 3>sense of belonging. And but we've gotten to the point

695
00:45:57.840 --> 00:46:02.000
<v Speaker 3>where I believe, quote unquote history is accelerate, is accelerating

696
00:46:03.400 --> 00:46:06.440
<v Speaker 3>there there there are more and more asymmetries popping up,

697
00:46:06.559 --> 00:46:09.320
<v Speaker 3>and you kind of on the student loan point, like

698
00:46:09.440 --> 00:46:12.280
<v Speaker 3>one of these main a symmetries is oftentimes I see

699
00:46:13.079 --> 00:46:15.800
<v Speaker 3>and just as a caveat, I don't have any student

700
00:46:15.840 --> 00:46:20.760
<v Speaker 3>loans like this is not from a motivated perspective. In fact,

701
00:46:20.800 --> 00:46:23.760
<v Speaker 3>i'd be just from what I've seen, I should be

702
00:46:23.920 --> 00:46:29.599
<v Speaker 3>disincentivized from advocating for student loans dischargeable and bankruptcy. But

703
00:46:29.679 --> 00:46:33.039
<v Speaker 3>from like a pragmatic perspective, it does not. There is

704
00:46:33.039 --> 00:46:37.760
<v Speaker 3>a fundamental asymmetry introduced when you prevent when you prevent

705
00:46:37.800 --> 00:46:41.360
<v Speaker 3>student loans from being dischargeable bankruptcy, and that is obviously

706
00:46:41.440 --> 00:46:47.519
<v Speaker 3>it allows for an unfettered ballooning of university budgets because

707
00:46:47.519 --> 00:46:51.519
<v Speaker 3>if something cannot be discharged, you're even from let's say

708
00:46:51.519 --> 00:46:56.280
<v Speaker 3>the libertarian visa's perspective, when you when you institute or

709
00:46:56.320 --> 00:47:00.000
<v Speaker 3>regulation like that, you're introducing an inherent market. And official

710
00:47:00.000 --> 00:47:03.119
<v Speaker 3>should see and we have seen that. You've seen if

711
00:47:03.159 --> 00:47:06.159
<v Speaker 3>you've seen the called the cost of college graphs, like

712
00:47:06.519 --> 00:47:08.840
<v Speaker 3>after two thousand and two, after there was a blanket

713
00:47:08.880 --> 00:47:14.639
<v Speaker 3>ban on dischargeability of student loans. Since two thousand and two, uh,

714
00:47:14.679 --> 00:47:20.559
<v Speaker 3>the cost of college has let's say, rapidly increased compared

715
00:47:20.599 --> 00:47:26.679
<v Speaker 3>to all other all other categories of analysis on the CPI,

716
00:47:28.280 --> 00:47:33.239
<v Speaker 3>and so the asymmetry here created is an asymmetry in

717
00:47:33.440 --> 00:47:40.039
<v Speaker 3>preference to institutions and corporations effectively at the direct expense

718
00:47:40.639 --> 00:47:44.599
<v Speaker 3>of the average citizen of the country. And and not

719
00:47:44.639 --> 00:47:47.719
<v Speaker 3>to like, uh, not to crap all over the boomers

720
00:47:47.760 --> 00:47:51.800
<v Speaker 3>too much, but the people you hear kind of this

721
00:47:52.000 --> 00:47:55.840
<v Speaker 3>list meme where it's like luxury boomer communism, it's luxury

722
00:47:55.880 --> 00:48:02.159
<v Speaker 3>boomer communism the at the spins of the rest of society.

723
00:48:02.679 --> 00:48:06.840
<v Speaker 3>And so there's an acceleration of these asymmetries, and it

724
00:48:06.920 --> 00:48:10.119
<v Speaker 3>almost seems to be I don't know if that's kind of,

725
00:48:10.599 --> 00:48:14.480
<v Speaker 3>let's say, an emergent phenomenon, or if the asymmetries are

726
00:48:14.519 --> 00:48:18.159
<v Speaker 3>the point, because we know in certain and certain strains

727
00:48:18.159 --> 00:48:22.360
<v Speaker 3>of Marxism the entire kind of mo is acceleration of

728
00:48:22.440 --> 00:48:29.159
<v Speaker 3>the contradictions, and so a widening, widening asymmetries are effectively

729
00:48:29.360 --> 00:48:34.239
<v Speaker 3>an acceleration of the contradiction. So it creates societal unrest.

730
00:48:34.320 --> 00:48:39.119
<v Speaker 3>But what's confusing, too is despite all of these increasingly

731
00:48:39.239 --> 00:48:43.599
<v Speaker 3>large asymmetries, you if you look around, you like, our

732
00:48:43.639 --> 00:48:47.440
<v Speaker 3>economy is not that bad. Like people aren't I mean,

733
00:48:47.519 --> 00:48:52.159
<v Speaker 3>outside of let's say New York. Instantly, people aren't necessarily

734
00:48:52.239 --> 00:48:57.440
<v Speaker 3>starving in the streets, like on mass scale, like poverty,

735
00:48:57.559 --> 00:49:00.880
<v Speaker 3>like poverty now is much lower compared to the nineteen

736
00:49:00.920 --> 00:49:04.039
<v Speaker 3>twenties or the nineteen fifties, And so it's like you

737
00:49:04.159 --> 00:49:07.599
<v Speaker 3>have this degree of let's say, like cognitive dissonance where

738
00:49:07.639 --> 00:49:10.599
<v Speaker 3>you look around and things are not that bad, but

739
00:49:10.679 --> 00:49:14.320
<v Speaker 3>you feel this kind of sense of civilizational foreboding. And

740
00:49:14.360 --> 00:49:17.440
<v Speaker 3>I think that that that's a degree that that dissonance

741
00:49:17.519 --> 00:49:26.039
<v Speaker 3>is created because of these increasingly large asymmetries where society

742
00:49:26.159 --> 00:49:30.639
<v Speaker 3>just does not seem to break or move regardless of

743
00:49:30.679 --> 00:49:34.679
<v Speaker 3>how large these asymmetries become. And so I think, I

744
00:49:34.679 --> 00:49:38.400
<v Speaker 3>think that's like creating a sense of unease because there

745
00:49:38.440 --> 00:49:45.840
<v Speaker 3>there is clearly like a mechanistic a mechanistic contradiction happening here.

746
00:49:47.800 --> 00:49:51.519
<v Speaker 3>And I think what going going in the future is

747
00:49:51.559 --> 00:49:54.159
<v Speaker 3>going Who has power in the future is just going

748
00:49:54.159 --> 00:49:56.880
<v Speaker 3>to depend on who capitalizes on this dissonance.

749
00:49:59.119 --> 00:50:02.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, and I find myself in somewhat of a similar

750
00:50:02.480 --> 00:50:05.760
<v Speaker 4>situation with housing prices, right Like I own a house

751
00:50:05.880 --> 00:50:09.519
<v Speaker 4>relatively recently. It would be kind of convenient for me

752
00:50:09.679 --> 00:50:16.400
<v Speaker 4>if that asset just kept inflating forever. But something needs

753
00:50:16.440 --> 00:50:21.559
<v Speaker 4>to happen there, and going back to you know, Mitchell's data,

754
00:50:21.639 --> 00:50:23.360
<v Speaker 4>this has been one of the really interesting things. Like,

755
00:50:23.400 --> 00:50:26.199
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a huge voter, not a huge democracy guy

756
00:50:26.239 --> 00:50:29.760
<v Speaker 4>per se, but you do have this sort of critical

757
00:50:29.800 --> 00:50:34.159
<v Speaker 4>mass of primarily young white men who swung hard for

758
00:50:34.199 --> 00:50:37.840
<v Speaker 4>Trump and have very quickly abandoned him in a relatively

759
00:50:37.840 --> 00:50:41.239
<v Speaker 4>short amount of time. And at least according to Mitchell

760
00:50:41.599 --> 00:50:44.800
<v Speaker 4>right that that was effectively a protest vote. Right, of

761
00:50:45.440 --> 00:50:47.840
<v Speaker 4>this is not working for us. You can look at

762
00:50:47.920 --> 00:50:51.159
<v Speaker 4>educational data, you can look at any sort of other

763
00:50:51.440 --> 00:50:55.920
<v Speaker 4>method of you know, kind of tracking achievement, and the

764
00:50:56.000 --> 00:50:59.559
<v Speaker 4>young people wouldever constitute that to be are not doing

765
00:50:59.719 --> 00:50:59.960
<v Speaker 4>very well.

766
00:51:00.119 --> 00:51:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Well.

767
00:51:01.440 --> 00:51:03.440
<v Speaker 4>If you dig into the you know, the economic stats,

768
00:51:03.480 --> 00:51:08.000
<v Speaker 4>you see a very similar thing. And particularly for the GOP,

769
00:51:08.119 --> 00:51:09.920
<v Speaker 4>they're in kind of a tough spot because you know,

770
00:51:10.000 --> 00:51:13.920
<v Speaker 4>their largest voting block is Gen X, and after that

771
00:51:13.960 --> 00:51:19.280
<v Speaker 4>the Boomers, who are proportionately quite wealthy. But the day

772
00:51:19.320 --> 00:51:21.440
<v Speaker 4>of the pillow is nigh, right, Boomers are about to

773
00:51:21.519 --> 00:51:23.960
<v Speaker 4>hit fifty percent mortality, and of course we understand that

774
00:51:23.960 --> 00:51:26.360
<v Speaker 4>that moves much much much more quickly once you get

775
00:51:26.360 --> 00:51:30.480
<v Speaker 4>past the fifty percent mark. And so at the same

776
00:51:30.519 --> 00:51:33.760
<v Speaker 4>time we were both seeing a sort of ideological shift,

777
00:51:33.920 --> 00:51:37.159
<v Speaker 4>you know, where the boomers who have the kind of

778
00:51:37.400 --> 00:51:40.400
<v Speaker 4>current or not the current, but the kind of dying

779
00:51:40.519 --> 00:51:43.840
<v Speaker 4>version of the American Republic, you know, like the FDR

780
00:51:43.920 --> 00:51:46.679
<v Speaker 4>regime and then the kind of you know Patch put

781
00:51:46.719 --> 00:51:50.599
<v Speaker 4>in in sixty four. They believe that more than almost

782
00:51:50.679 --> 00:51:54.480
<v Speaker 4>anyone else, their children slightly less, their grandchildren even less.

783
00:51:54.719 --> 00:51:56.159
<v Speaker 4>You see this on both the left and the right.

784
00:51:56.239 --> 00:51:58.440
<v Speaker 4>You know, more and more people on the left are

785
00:51:58.480 --> 00:52:02.639
<v Speaker 4>describing themselves as socialists. You know, they're rejecting albeit not

786
00:52:02.840 --> 00:52:05.000
<v Speaker 4>at a fundamental level, right, but they are rejecting the

787
00:52:05.039 --> 00:52:08.400
<v Speaker 4>kind of stricters of liberalism. So you have this both

788
00:52:08.480 --> 00:52:11.440
<v Speaker 4>this kind of incredible economic and achievement on the ease

789
00:52:11.480 --> 00:52:13.840
<v Speaker 4>that you were talking about, mixed with a sort of

790
00:52:14.280 --> 00:52:17.519
<v Speaker 4>political shift. I think it's a very interesting and sort

791
00:52:17.519 --> 00:52:20.880
<v Speaker 4>of exciting time to be in the discourse as it's described.

792
00:52:21.599 --> 00:52:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

793
00:52:22.760 --> 00:52:26.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, one of the other things I think that's interesting,

794
00:52:26.880 --> 00:52:29.960
<v Speaker 4>and this is masic. This is my personal thoughts on

795
00:52:31.519 --> 00:52:34.320
<v Speaker 4>the kind of student loans, which is like a very

796
00:52:34.360 --> 00:52:40.920
<v Speaker 4>basic patronage point, which is the education system universities. The

797
00:52:40.960 --> 00:52:43.960
<v Speaker 4>people who make their money from that are not my friends.

798
00:52:45.280 --> 00:52:48.400
<v Speaker 4>They don't believe anything in common with me, and I

799
00:52:48.440 --> 00:52:51.280
<v Speaker 4>did not particularly enjoy my time there for you know,

800
00:52:51.360 --> 00:52:53.920
<v Speaker 4>political reasons as well as just you know, social ones.

801
00:52:54.559 --> 00:52:59.760
<v Speaker 4>But why would you go to the mat right, alienate

802
00:53:00.159 --> 00:53:03.280
<v Speaker 4>potential allies for the sake of a group of people

803
00:53:03.280 --> 00:53:07.840
<v Speaker 4>that hate you? University professors, we understand their politics broadly speaking,

804
00:53:08.559 --> 00:53:11.960
<v Speaker 4>and to me, setting aside any kind of principle of argument,

805
00:53:12.199 --> 00:53:17.480
<v Speaker 4>just on a pure patronage level analysis, there's a very

806
00:53:17.519 --> 00:53:21.400
<v Speaker 4>clear answer, which is take resources from your enemies to

807
00:53:21.480 --> 00:53:22.800
<v Speaker 4>buy yourself new friends.

808
00:53:23.199 --> 00:53:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Right.

809
00:53:23.360 --> 00:53:26.599
<v Speaker 4>Our opponents understand this quite well. And you know, I

810
00:53:26.599 --> 00:53:28.719
<v Speaker 4>think that that sort of kind of you know, what

811
00:53:28.760 --> 00:53:32.559
<v Speaker 4>Francis would have called, like the beautiful loser mentality, you know,

812
00:53:32.599 --> 00:53:34.880
<v Speaker 4>the idea that you know, I will stick to the

813
00:53:34.960 --> 00:53:37.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, the rules as written, the kind of you know,

814
00:53:37.519 --> 00:53:41.280
<v Speaker 4>originalist constitution or you know, the kind of you know,

815
00:53:41.440 --> 00:53:46.679
<v Speaker 4>upstanding correct way of doing politics. I mean, I'm not

816
00:53:46.679 --> 00:53:48.480
<v Speaker 4>the biggest fan of Trump, but I do think that

817
00:53:48.559 --> 00:53:52.280
<v Speaker 4>the the people who cried about him, you know, shattering

818
00:53:52.360 --> 00:53:56.920
<v Speaker 4>democratic norms again in scare quotes, they weren't entirely wrong,

819
00:53:57.039 --> 00:53:59.159
<v Speaker 4>and it was less that he shattered them and more

820
00:53:59.199 --> 00:54:03.440
<v Speaker 4>realized that had become they had sort of ossified and

821
00:54:03.519 --> 00:54:08.679
<v Speaker 4>become guardrails, right, and within that box you would never win.

822
00:54:08.920 --> 00:54:12.440
<v Speaker 4>Albeit you know, he is far from you know, the

823
00:54:12.440 --> 00:54:15.960
<v Speaker 4>sort of genuine reformer, you know, restructuring needed. But I

824
00:54:15.960 --> 00:54:21.079
<v Speaker 4>think that that's another kind of interesting, interesting symptom I

825
00:54:21.119 --> 00:54:23.639
<v Speaker 4>guess of that. So sorry, I threw a bunch at you. Heygil,

826
00:54:23.679 --> 00:54:24.920
<v Speaker 4>I'll give you a chance to respond.

827
00:54:27.039 --> 00:54:30.679
<v Speaker 3>And I think just in terms of the protecting institutions,

828
00:54:31.960 --> 00:54:36.320
<v Speaker 3>I think that's just a simple consequence of like, well,

829
00:54:36.599 --> 00:54:43.840
<v Speaker 3>there's there's this weird kind of contradiction amongst the boomers. Uh,

830
00:54:44.159 --> 00:54:48.599
<v Speaker 3>they have this they have this almost institutional fetishism, fetishism

831
00:54:49.239 --> 00:54:55.559
<v Speaker 3>while simultaneously being kind of the fledgling generation that attempted

832
00:54:55.599 --> 00:55:00.320
<v Speaker 3>to usurp the institutions. The entire kind of woods Stock

833
00:55:00.440 --> 00:55:08.079
<v Speaker 3>generation was, let's just say was was anti institution in

834
00:55:08.119 --> 00:55:11.000
<v Speaker 3>the sense that they thought that there is an old

835
00:55:11.039 --> 00:55:14.159
<v Speaker 3>way of doing things that they they should personally take

836
00:55:14.199 --> 00:55:19.480
<v Speaker 3>the mantle and overturn. They weren't necessarily anti institution, and

837
00:55:19.519 --> 00:55:22.920
<v Speaker 3>that they wanted to abolish the institutions, but they wanted

838
00:55:23.000 --> 00:55:25.599
<v Speaker 3>they wanted to take them, they wanted to seize them.

839
00:55:25.800 --> 00:55:30.159
<v Speaker 3>And I think if we contrast this two let's just say,

840
00:55:30.360 --> 00:55:35.800
<v Speaker 3>the conservative way of approaching that tends to be parallelism

841
00:55:36.280 --> 00:55:40.159
<v Speaker 3>instead of instead of let's say, sieging the institutions, like

842
00:55:40.280 --> 00:55:45.400
<v Speaker 3>doing what is necessary at whatever costs to get those

843
00:55:45.440 --> 00:55:51.480
<v Speaker 3>institutions back, the conservatives would rather see them even if

844
00:55:51.519 --> 00:55:53.880
<v Speaker 3>there is still a degree of deference for them, and

845
00:55:54.039 --> 00:55:58.119
<v Speaker 3>create parallel ones. And these parallel ones, I mean you

846
00:55:58.679 --> 00:56:01.639
<v Speaker 3>so to kind of site redeemed Zuomer. I don't know

847
00:56:01.639 --> 00:56:05.039
<v Speaker 3>if you're familiar with him. He's like, he's a Presbyterian,

848
00:56:05.079 --> 00:56:10.400
<v Speaker 3>the PCUSA church, and he specifically chose to to join

849
00:56:10.519 --> 00:56:15.559
<v Speaker 3>the more let's say, the original, the original branch the

850
00:56:15.599 --> 00:56:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Presterian Church, despite the fact that they allow female priests

851
00:56:19.960 --> 00:56:23.559
<v Speaker 3>or whatever pastors, and despite the fact that they endorse

852
00:56:23.760 --> 00:56:30.760
<v Speaker 3>in certain in certain churches LGBTQ stuff. His idea was

853
00:56:30.800 --> 00:56:34.559
<v Speaker 3>that consistently within the history of prostism, it has been

854
00:56:34.679 --> 00:56:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Protestants leaving the established institutions and creating their own institutions

855
00:56:40.840 --> 00:56:44.000
<v Speaker 3>when the other institutions become more liberal. So the reason

856
00:56:44.000 --> 00:56:46.639
<v Speaker 3>why I joined the pc USA church because I'm trying

857
00:56:46.639 --> 00:56:50.400
<v Speaker 3>to retake the institution from the inside. He's like a

858
00:56:52.079 --> 00:56:55.199
<v Speaker 3>to for lack of a better term or phrase, like

859
00:56:55.360 --> 00:57:02.119
<v Speaker 3>a one man kind of in reconquiste conserve entist if

860
00:57:02.159 --> 00:57:06.519
<v Speaker 3>you will. Yeah, And I like the idea behind that,

861
00:57:07.000 --> 00:57:10.280
<v Speaker 3>But the problem is it's just, for some reason, the

862
00:57:10.320 --> 00:57:17.440
<v Speaker 3>position of the conservative American is just not geared towards

863
00:57:17.440 --> 00:57:22.239
<v Speaker 3>that idea of retaking institutions. It's always parallelism. Let's create

864
00:57:22.239 --> 00:57:26.320
<v Speaker 3>our parallel institutions. The problem is that you're giving You're

865
00:57:26.400 --> 00:57:31.719
<v Speaker 3>just freely giving the reins uninhibited to the progressive cause

866
00:57:31.840 --> 00:57:34.960
<v Speaker 3>of all these historical institutions. You're just giving them these

867
00:57:35.000 --> 00:57:39.920
<v Speaker 3>culture making apparatuses and just hoping and hoping and praying

868
00:57:40.000 --> 00:57:43.599
<v Speaker 3>that your parallel institution ends up being successful and ends

869
00:57:43.679 --> 00:57:47.880
<v Speaker 3>up having similar cultural weight, which it almost never does.

870
00:57:48.480 --> 00:57:51.559
<v Speaker 3>So and I tried to interrogate this where it's like,

871
00:57:51.719 --> 00:57:55.480
<v Speaker 3>why is this kind of the base impulse of the

872
00:57:55.480 --> 00:57:59.320
<v Speaker 3>American right? Why is parallelism the base impulse? I don't

873
00:57:59.400 --> 00:58:03.079
<v Speaker 3>understand why we were have been perpetually in this frame

874
00:58:03.119 --> 00:58:06.599
<v Speaker 3>of parallelism as opposed to the kind of left wing

875
00:58:06.639 --> 00:58:08.639
<v Speaker 3>frame where it's like, if you have a problem with

876
00:58:08.679 --> 00:58:13.800
<v Speaker 3>the institutions, let's capture them. And I'm hopeful that with

877
00:58:13.920 --> 00:58:17.920
<v Speaker 3>gen Z, like the seven percent ras musem poll. I'm

878
00:58:17.960 --> 00:58:20.800
<v Speaker 3>hopeful that that's changing and we're getting a bit more

879
00:58:20.840 --> 00:58:26.679
<v Speaker 3>of an energetic propulsion on the right that that is

880
00:58:26.920 --> 00:58:30.079
<v Speaker 3>enough to recapture some of the institutions that's opposed to

881
00:58:30.079 --> 00:58:34.480
<v Speaker 3>just default to this parallelism. But I don't really see

882
00:58:34.480 --> 00:58:39.159
<v Speaker 3>a lot of historical precedent for the right recapturing an

883
00:58:39.199 --> 00:58:44.559
<v Speaker 3>integral institution once it has been culturally infiltrated. There's there's

884
00:58:45.119 --> 00:58:47.840
<v Speaker 3>flight oscillations like we'll get it back for a little bit,

885
00:58:47.920 --> 00:58:52.880
<v Speaker 3>or will exert some influence, but like it just ultimately

886
00:58:52.960 --> 00:58:56.960
<v Speaker 3>reverts that base state of kind of progressivism. And so

887
00:58:57.079 --> 00:58:59.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, I'm curious to hear your thoughts on

888
00:58:59.519 --> 00:59:02.920
<v Speaker 3>how we can kind of create that propulsion for recapture

889
00:59:03.920 --> 00:59:06.280
<v Speaker 3>as compared to parallelism.

890
00:59:06.719 --> 00:59:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Yes, there's several things there. This is a point from

891
00:59:10.360 --> 00:59:16.119
<v Speaker 4>land I think it's the chapter Cracker Factory in Dark Enlightenment,

892
00:59:16.519 --> 00:59:19.039
<v Speaker 4>which is it's to be honest, it's hilarious as well

893
00:59:19.039 --> 00:59:23.000
<v Speaker 4>as insightful. But his point is effectively that the Anglo

894
00:59:23.159 --> 00:59:27.280
<v Speaker 4>mode of conflict resolution is effectively you fight it out

895
00:59:27.360 --> 00:59:29.679
<v Speaker 4>and then the loser leaves to start their own thing.

896
00:59:31.079 --> 00:59:33.400
<v Speaker 4>You could look at the English Civil War, right the

897
00:59:33.440 --> 00:59:37.039
<v Speaker 4>Formation of America all the way down to modern day

898
00:59:37.039 --> 00:59:39.719
<v Speaker 4>white flight. The idea is, you know, okay, well I

899
00:59:39.760 --> 00:59:43.199
<v Speaker 4>can't have my culture here, so I'll go make my own.

900
00:59:44.559 --> 00:59:47.000
<v Speaker 4>And I think a large part of that is you

901
00:59:47.000 --> 00:59:50.400
<v Speaker 4>could look at it's kind of like ebagenetic almost. But

902
00:59:50.519 --> 00:59:59.199
<v Speaker 4>also I think that the problem for conservatives with that

903
00:59:59.239 --> 01:00:08.599
<v Speaker 4>sort of entry is that the force which effectively the

904
01:00:08.639 --> 01:00:12.519
<v Speaker 4>progressives are aligned with entropy, and so you know, there's

905
01:00:12.519 --> 01:00:15.000
<v Speaker 4>sort of a certain gravity to what they do. You know,

906
01:00:15.000 --> 01:00:18.480
<v Speaker 4>it is much more difficult to you know, deprogressive ize

907
01:00:18.559 --> 01:00:21.039
<v Speaker 4>something than it is to you know, to make it

908
01:00:21.159 --> 01:00:26.039
<v Speaker 4>more kind of leftist. And so to me, I guess

909
01:00:26.360 --> 01:00:32.079
<v Speaker 4>I see, you know, parallelism as a entirely rational short

910
01:00:32.119 --> 01:00:37.880
<v Speaker 4>to medium term strategy because of the sort of power

911
01:00:37.880 --> 01:00:40.880
<v Speaker 4>imbalance there that you know, if this is sort of

912
01:00:40.880 --> 01:00:43.920
<v Speaker 4>a fifty to fifty struggle, then fair enough. But I

913
01:00:43.960 --> 01:00:48.679
<v Speaker 4>don't necessarily see how with one guy and I made

914
01:00:48.719 --> 01:00:51.800
<v Speaker 4>this point to redeemed Sumer and I am now blocked

915
01:00:51.840 --> 01:00:53.920
<v Speaker 4>on the interne locked on Twitter.

916
01:00:54.639 --> 01:00:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Did he really?

917
01:00:56.039 --> 01:00:57.880
<v Speaker 4>It was years It was years ago. I got upset

918
01:00:57.880 --> 01:01:01.880
<v Speaker 4>about it. But uh, you know, point is, so I

919
01:01:01.920 --> 01:01:05.400
<v Speaker 4>think that you were entirely correct, and that attitude of

920
01:01:05.719 --> 01:01:10.039
<v Speaker 4>eternal retreat, of you know, splintering forever, you know, finding

921
01:01:10.119 --> 01:01:11.760
<v Speaker 4>the three guys who agree with you and starting your

922
01:01:11.760 --> 01:01:14.559
<v Speaker 4>own thing is incorrect. But to me, you know, when

923
01:01:14.599 --> 01:01:17.599
<v Speaker 4>I look at you know, the boards my friends from

924
01:01:17.639 --> 01:01:20.320
<v Speaker 4>South Africa, you know, I think of an article written

925
01:01:20.360 --> 01:01:22.920
<v Speaker 4>by I think it's Ernst Roots or Ernst ven Zeel,

926
01:01:23.079 --> 01:01:26.239
<v Speaker 4>one of the Ernsts you know, wrote this article where

927
01:01:26.280 --> 01:01:29.239
<v Speaker 4>he compared it to you know, digging a trench. And

928
01:01:29.239 --> 01:01:31.920
<v Speaker 4>this was an article that was very impactful on me

929
01:01:32.039 --> 01:01:34.559
<v Speaker 4>shortly before I entered, you know, the kind of internet world,

930
01:01:34.920 --> 01:01:37.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, living after school, and you know, one of

931
01:01:37.960 --> 01:01:41.880
<v Speaker 4>many kind of you know, godless progressive American urban centers.

932
01:01:42.440 --> 01:01:48.079
<v Speaker 4>And his point was there is a time for retreat tactically,

933
01:01:48.599 --> 01:01:53.599
<v Speaker 4>but you do not do that, to retreat forever. You retreat,

934
01:01:53.639 --> 01:01:57.079
<v Speaker 4>to dig a trench, to make something defensible, to make

935
01:01:57.119 --> 01:02:00.719
<v Speaker 4>something you can fight for. And to me, you know,

936
01:02:00.760 --> 01:02:04.360
<v Speaker 4>the answer is neither, you know, progressivism or entryism as

937
01:02:04.440 --> 01:02:07.039
<v Speaker 4>one universal strategy. This gets back to our point about

938
01:02:07.559 --> 01:02:10.599
<v Speaker 4>like the Constitution or any particular law. It's like, well,

939
01:02:11.920 --> 01:02:14.360
<v Speaker 4>there is a time for each And in my mind

940
01:02:14.440 --> 01:02:17.480
<v Speaker 4>I completely understand, you know, the rationale that says, look like,

941
01:02:17.920 --> 01:02:23.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, I am barred from you know, certain jobs,

942
01:02:23.800 --> 01:02:27.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm barred from a certain place. I must you know,

943
01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:30.199
<v Speaker 4>support my family. So there's an element of retreat to that, right,

944
01:02:30.280 --> 01:02:33.920
<v Speaker 4>find something. But once you were there, right, that institution,

945
01:02:34.039 --> 01:02:35.480
<v Speaker 4>that thing that you were building, that thing that you

946
01:02:35.480 --> 01:02:39.800
<v Speaker 4>were making, must be defended. And you know, I see

947
01:02:39.800 --> 01:02:41.639
<v Speaker 4>this in my own religious community. I see it in

948
01:02:41.840 --> 01:02:44.119
<v Speaker 4>you know, in others, and so to me, I guess

949
01:02:44.239 --> 01:02:48.880
<v Speaker 4>I may disagree with you on parallelism because I think

950
01:02:48.880 --> 01:02:51.760
<v Speaker 4>that it is entirely rational in the short to mid term.

951
01:02:52.000 --> 01:02:56.079
<v Speaker 4>It's not an eternal strategy, but I mean, hell, you

952
01:02:56.119 --> 01:02:58.960
<v Speaker 4>can even look at uh, you know, arn't. Younger makes

953
01:02:59.000 --> 01:03:02.480
<v Speaker 4>a very similar point in the Forest Passage and umswell

954
01:03:02.519 --> 01:03:05.000
<v Speaker 4>both right that you know, when faced with kind of

955
01:03:05.079 --> 01:03:08.800
<v Speaker 4>a you know, a toutalitarian system or a totalizing system,

956
01:03:09.280 --> 01:03:13.880
<v Speaker 4>is one might more accurately say that a direct you know,

957
01:03:13.920 --> 01:03:16.880
<v Speaker 4>head on, full frontal assault, you'll be squished like a buck.

958
01:03:17.679 --> 01:03:20.840
<v Speaker 4>But I'll give it back to you. I guess that's

959
01:03:20.880 --> 01:03:22.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of my thoughts on it, at least initially.

960
01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:27.000
<v Speaker 3>But then on the other point, if you look at

961
01:03:27.000 --> 01:03:34.159
<v Speaker 3>like let's say, like Ernst Youngers, let's say contrarianism to

962
01:03:34.199 --> 01:03:40.960
<v Speaker 3>the Nazi regime. He he was still involved in the

963
01:03:40.960 --> 01:03:45.519
<v Speaker 3>institution and he and he was contrariant to it, or

964
01:03:45.599 --> 01:03:49.280
<v Speaker 3>he was let's say, opposed to it as it was

965
01:03:49.480 --> 01:03:53.639
<v Speaker 3>comporting itself, and that ended up getting his son killed.

966
01:03:54.239 --> 01:03:58.199
<v Speaker 3>And so kind of like there's still like I don't

967
01:03:58.199 --> 01:04:01.480
<v Speaker 3>think we can compartmental life. It's like there's no such

968
01:04:01.519 --> 01:04:06.960
<v Speaker 3>thing I think as discrete kind of parallelism, and that's attempted,

969
01:04:07.159 --> 01:04:11.800
<v Speaker 3>but you're still under the shadow of these institutions, like

970
01:04:12.079 --> 01:04:15.360
<v Speaker 3>and that was a very real consequence in Art's Younger's life,

971
01:04:15.480 --> 01:04:18.880
<v Speaker 3>like his his kind of antagonism to the Nazi regime

972
01:04:18.960 --> 01:04:22.039
<v Speaker 3>got his son killed in Italy, and so and that's

973
01:04:22.119 --> 01:04:26.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of I don't necessarily disagree with you that it

974
01:04:26.239 --> 01:04:29.960
<v Speaker 3>may be a good tactical decision in the short term,

975
01:04:30.039 --> 01:04:34.639
<v Speaker 3>but ultimately it has to be a tactical decision positioning

976
01:04:34.679 --> 01:04:39.280
<v Speaker 3>yourself to ultimately confront the main institutions itself. And it

977
01:04:39.280 --> 01:04:43.480
<v Speaker 3>seems like that just that seems to not be the case,

978
01:04:43.639 --> 01:04:48.039
<v Speaker 3>Like like the just from deferring back to redeemed Zumer situation,

979
01:04:49.400 --> 01:04:53.920
<v Speaker 3>the I believe it's p USA as opposed to pc USA.

980
01:04:54.000 --> 01:04:57.360
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember the other Presbyterian branch, but they are

981
01:04:57.400 --> 01:05:01.639
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily directly antagonistic or trying to poach members of

982
01:05:01.719 --> 01:05:05.079
<v Speaker 3>pc USA. They're kind of they're kind of in this

983
01:05:05.199 --> 01:05:07.320
<v Speaker 3>mode of I just want to be left alone, just

984
01:05:07.360 --> 01:05:10.920
<v Speaker 3>do not subvert this new institution I've created, And that's

985
01:05:11.000 --> 01:05:14.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of been the conservative, like like the conservative conservative

986
01:05:14.519 --> 01:05:17.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of mentality, I just want to be left alone,

987
01:05:17.840 --> 01:05:21.719
<v Speaker 3>and the progressive mentalities I want to consume all things,

988
01:05:21.800 --> 01:05:24.559
<v Speaker 3>like I want everything to be under my thumb. And

989
01:05:24.599 --> 01:05:26.920
<v Speaker 3>so it's kind of when you have that, when you

990
01:05:27.039 --> 01:05:32.639
<v Speaker 3>have those two kind of like fundamentally opposite dispositions, one

991
01:05:32.719 --> 01:05:35.960
<v Speaker 3>is going to prevail. And like I said, I think

992
01:05:36.079 --> 01:05:41.199
<v Speaker 3>parallelism is a completely rational, pragmatic decision. The problem is,

993
01:05:41.239 --> 01:05:43.960
<v Speaker 3>I do not think it is sustainable when you when

994
01:05:44.000 --> 01:05:50.880
<v Speaker 3>your enemy is held bent on subsubing every single institution

995
01:05:51.519 --> 01:05:56.440
<v Speaker 3>created in parallel or not. And Eric Hoffer has this

996
01:05:56.519 --> 01:06:01.000
<v Speaker 3>really good quote where he said, the kind of benefit

997
01:06:01.079 --> 01:06:05.199
<v Speaker 3>of the leftist, so the progressive, is that people who

998
01:06:05.559 --> 01:06:09.800
<v Speaker 3>lack things, or who think they lack things, are willing

999
01:06:09.880 --> 01:06:12.760
<v Speaker 3>to fight and die for that which they do not have,

1000
01:06:13.360 --> 01:06:16.199
<v Speaker 3>but people who have are not willing to fight and

1001
01:06:16.239 --> 01:06:19.360
<v Speaker 3>die for that which they already possess. And so the

1002
01:06:19.519 --> 01:06:24.079
<v Speaker 3>entire progressive mode of operation, because it's just like devouring,

1003
01:06:24.599 --> 01:06:29.199
<v Speaker 3>it's this desire to devour, a desire to pull society,

1004
01:06:29.320 --> 01:06:33.280
<v Speaker 3>and this idolized direction that has not yet been obtained.

1005
01:06:33.800 --> 01:06:36.960
<v Speaker 3>They can frame and they can exist in this mentality

1006
01:06:37.280 --> 01:06:40.679
<v Speaker 3>where no matter how much they achieve or how many

1007
01:06:40.679 --> 01:06:43.800
<v Speaker 3>institutions they capture, it's still not enough. They do not

1008
01:06:44.119 --> 01:06:47.559
<v Speaker 3>have that kind of critical threshold that they desire to

1009
01:06:47.599 --> 01:06:52.599
<v Speaker 3>completely terrorform society. And so whereas conservatives there are let's say,

1010
01:06:52.920 --> 01:06:55.719
<v Speaker 3>more willing to be content, more willing to be contented

1011
01:06:55.880 --> 01:06:58.480
<v Speaker 3>with what they have or what they can't create, and

1012
01:06:58.519 --> 01:07:02.599
<v Speaker 3>so there isn't this kind of drive that is extant

1013
01:07:02.719 --> 01:07:08.320
<v Speaker 3>among the progressives to capture that which they think they

1014
01:07:08.360 --> 01:07:11.119
<v Speaker 3>do not have, because they think what they have is sufficient.

1015
01:07:12.039 --> 01:07:14.119
<v Speaker 3>And so that's kind of my my view. And like

1016
01:07:14.400 --> 01:07:19.280
<v Speaker 3>the critical flaw of like discrete parallelism as a as

1017
01:07:19.280 --> 01:07:24.440
<v Speaker 3>a governing strategy is it's doomed to fail just just

1018
01:07:24.519 --> 01:07:28.000
<v Speaker 3>by virtue of who the enemy is in position to

1019
01:07:28.119 --> 01:07:32.639
<v Speaker 3>who we are, or like what motivates us but obviously,

1020
01:07:32.679 --> 01:07:37.119
<v Speaker 3>like you said, like the progressive position is inclined toward entropy,

1021
01:07:37.760 --> 01:07:41.320
<v Speaker 3>order takes it like order takes a lot more energy

1022
01:07:41.480 --> 01:07:46.519
<v Speaker 3>injected into the system to actually like for thisstem to

1023
01:07:46.519 --> 01:07:51.679
<v Speaker 3>actually order itself. If the progressive kind of the progressive

1024
01:07:51.880 --> 01:07:57.119
<v Speaker 3>directionality is always in tropic, there's not. It's kind of effortless.

1025
01:07:57.119 --> 01:08:01.960
<v Speaker 3>It's an effortless, effortless march, whereas going against that requires

1026
01:08:02.480 --> 01:08:06.920
<v Speaker 3>an asymmetric amount of energy to be expended, which makes

1027
01:08:06.960 --> 01:08:11.559
<v Speaker 3>the parallels I'm totally understandable on an individual act or perspective,

1028
01:08:12.119 --> 01:08:15.000
<v Speaker 3>but as like, if we kind of scale out and

1029
01:08:15.119 --> 01:08:19.119
<v Speaker 3>look at the course of history, it's going to be

1030
01:08:19.159 --> 01:08:22.079
<v Speaker 3>a doomed a doomed strategy. I fear.

1031
01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:26.840
<v Speaker 4>It's a bug man Hagel. We're a little bit over time.

1032
01:08:26.880 --> 01:08:30.039
<v Speaker 4>It's been a fascinating discussion. Where can people find you?

1033
01:08:30.079 --> 01:08:31.000
<v Speaker 4>They want more of your work?

1034
01:08:32.159 --> 01:08:35.079
<v Speaker 3>I'm just on Twitter now. I started a podcast like

1035
01:08:35.119 --> 01:08:40.600
<v Speaker 3>two years ago, but I started getting nervous with being

1036
01:08:41.520 --> 01:08:44.039
<v Speaker 3>let's say, getting exposed and docs. I kind of like

1037
01:08:44.079 --> 01:08:48.079
<v Speaker 3>to keep my online presence and my offline presence discreete

1038
01:08:48.159 --> 01:08:51.600
<v Speaker 3>but so mainly Twitter, my handle is fed posting my

1039
01:08:51.680 --> 01:08:53.880
<v Speaker 3>use name is bug Man Hegel. You can just find

1040
01:08:53.920 --> 01:08:54.600
<v Speaker 3>me there.

1041
01:08:56.520 --> 01:08:59.319
<v Speaker 4>Well, sure thing. And also there's a few other interviews

1042
01:08:59.319 --> 01:09:02.239
<v Speaker 4>out there pretty good with you on them. Maybe link

1043
01:09:02.279 --> 01:09:04.039
<v Speaker 4>one or two of those in the description. As far

1044
01:09:04.039 --> 01:09:07.720
<v Speaker 4>as my stuff, Jay Burdens Show, Apple, Spotify, YouTube, this

1045
01:09:07.760 --> 01:09:09.920
<v Speaker 4>is what I do full time. If you want to

1046
01:09:09.920 --> 01:09:11.560
<v Speaker 4>support me, you can throw me a few bucks a

1047
01:09:11.600 --> 01:09:14.920
<v Speaker 4>month on Patreon, Substack or gum Road. You hit the

1048
01:09:14.920 --> 01:09:18.720
<v Speaker 4>episodes early in ad free. I know they're annoying, the ads,

1049
01:09:18.840 --> 01:09:22.199
<v Speaker 4>but I got a mortgage, guys, what can I say? Also,

1050
01:09:22.239 --> 01:09:24.720
<v Speaker 4>you can check out our sponsor, Axious Remote Fitness Coaching.

1051
01:09:25.119 --> 01:09:28.000
<v Speaker 4>JD's a good business man, he's a good friend. You

1052
01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:31.319
<v Speaker 4>should support him. And look, I've gone to enough of

1053
01:09:31.319 --> 01:09:33.800
<v Speaker 4>these events I met you guys. Some of you could

1054
01:09:33.880 --> 01:09:37.439
<v Speaker 4>use some personal training, so check out JD's work for that. Again,

1055
01:09:37.560 --> 01:09:39.159
<v Speaker 4>buck Man Hegel, it was great speaking to you.

1056
01:09:39.880 --> 01:09:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having me.

1057
01:09:41.319 --> 01:09:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Never keep your het up.

1058
01:09:42.960 --> 01:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Good night. Marketing is hard, but I'll tell you a

1059
01:10:17.479 --> 01:10:19.439
<v Speaker 1>little secret. It doesn't have to be. Let me point

1060
01:10:19.439 --> 01:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>something out. You're listening to a podcast right now and

1061
01:10:21.960 --> 01:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>it's great. You love the host.

1062
01:10:23.359 --> 01:10:24.520
<v Speaker 3>You seek it out and download it.

1063
01:10:24.560 --> 01:10:27.239
<v Speaker 4>You listen to it while driving, working out, cooking, even

1064
01:10:27.279 --> 01:10:28.560
<v Speaker 4>going to the bathroom.

1065
01:10:28.600 --> 01:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts are a pretty close companion. And this is a

1066
01:10:31.920 --> 01:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>podcast ad.

1067
01:10:32.960 --> 01:10:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Did I get your attention?

1068
01:10:34.439 --> 01:10:37.800
<v Speaker 4>You can reach great listeners like yourself with podcast advertising

1069
01:10:37.960 --> 01:10:42.119
<v Speaker 4>from libsynads. Choose from hundreds of top podcasts offering host endorsements,

1070
01:10:42.359 --> 01:10:44.720
<v Speaker 4>or run a pre produced ad like this one across

1071
01:10:44.720 --> 01:10:47.000
<v Speaker 4>thousands of shows. To reach your target audience and their

1072
01:10:47.039 --> 01:10:50.640
<v Speaker 4>favorite podcasts with libsynads, go to libsynads dot com.

1073
01:10:50.680 --> 01:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>That's l I B s y n ads dot com

1074
01:10:53.600 --> 01:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Today
