Speaker 1: Your world of deceit.
Speaker 2: Telling the truth is a revolutionary act. It's the David
Speaker 2: Knight Show.
Speaker 3: As the clock strikes thirteen, it is Friday, it is Monday,
Speaker 3: the twenty eighth of July. He're of our Lord twenty
Speaker 3: twenty five. Got another lesson on line should be careful
Speaker 3: with your data from the t app and McDonald's security.
Speaker 3: When it comes to online data as a myth, You've
Speaker 3: got more AI fatigue as people begin to realize those
Speaker 3: pushing it have overpromised, down under delivered. Stay with us,
Speaker 3: Welcome to the show today, folks. We have video frozen,
Speaker 3: but we're working on that today in the studio. We
Speaker 3: don't have any air conditioning, so it's going to get
Speaker 3: very very warm in here as the day goes on,
Speaker 3: and I ask you bear with us as I try
Speaker 3: not to collapse from heatstroke. But as I said, we've
Speaker 3: had object lessons in why data security online is a myth.
Speaker 3: We're going to start with what's going on with the
Speaker 3: t app. This was basically a gossip app where women
Speaker 3: could go online and complain about men. It started out
Speaker 3: as sort of a well potentially noble idea. I guess
Speaker 3: in the fact that women could go on there and
Speaker 3: try to warn other women about men they thought were predatory,
Speaker 3: but it quickly devolved into nothing but gossip and vitriol.
Speaker 3: So this is hackers leak thirteen thousand user photos and
Speaker 3: IDs from the t app designed as a women's safe space.
Speaker 3: The viral app requires new users to take selfies, which
Speaker 3: it says it deletes after review. Now they're saying that
Speaker 3: this was from old data, that if you joined after
Speaker 3: twenty twenty four, your data is safe, but anyone that
Speaker 3: joined before that, they put all their selfies into an
Speaker 3: unprotected bin which was accessible just so long as you
Speaker 3: had the URL.
Speaker 1: There wasn't any type.
Speaker 3: Of log in or pass or required, so this wasn't
Speaker 3: even really a hack. Someone just found where this stuff
Speaker 3: was and it was able to be downloaded immediately, says
Speaker 3: hackers have breached the t app, which again, this wasn't
Speaker 3: even really a hack. It was just someone found the url,
Speaker 3: which recently went viral as a place for women to
Speaker 3: safely talk about men, and again it was a guy
Speaker 3: gossip pap in. Tens of thousands of women's selfies and
Speaker 3: photos photo IDs have now seemingly been leaked online. A
Speaker 3: spokesperson confirmed the hack Friday afternoon. The company estimates that
Speaker 3: seventy two thousand images, including thirteen thousand verification photos images
Speaker 3: of government IDs, were accessed. They got the information on
Speaker 3: so many different people, says. Teas designed to function as
Speaker 3: a virtual virtual whisper network for women again gossip, allowing
Speaker 3: them to upload photos of men and search for them
Speaker 3: by name. Users can leave comments describing specific men as
Speaker 3: a red flag or a green flag. Another information about
Speaker 3: them recently gained such popularity that became the top free
Speaker 3: app in the Apple App Store this week. It seems
Speaker 3: like these women really did love their gossip. The app
Speaker 3: claimed Thursday to have recently gained nearly a million new
Speaker 3: sign ups. Isn't that The signing up for Tea requires
Speaker 3: users to take selfies, which the app says are deleted
Speaker 3: after a view to prove there are women again, depending
Speaker 3: they might by modern standards have some trouble defining what
Speaker 3: a woman is. All users who got accepted are promised
Speaker 3: anonymity outside of the usernames they choose. Taking screenshots of
Speaker 3: what's in the app is also blocked. The hacker access
Speaker 3: to database from more than two years ago, the t
Speaker 3: spokesperson said, adding that This data was originally stored in
Speaker 3: compliance with law enforcement requirements related to cyberbullying prevention. Cyberbullying again,
Speaker 3: is the most ridiculous term. If you're getting cyberbullied, there's
Speaker 3: a very easy fix. Turn off the computer, don't go
Speaker 3: back to the website, whatever it is.
Speaker 1: Just stop that.
Speaker 3: These people they can't find you, as the general rule
Speaker 3: in real life, or even if they know where you live,
Speaker 3: they're probably not going to come track you down. If
Speaker 3: you're getting cyberbullied, turn off the computer and stop engaging
Speaker 3: with those people. It's a very simple process. The T
Speaker 3: spokesperson said that the company has hired third party cybersecurity
Speaker 3: experts and is working around the clock to secure our systems.
Speaker 3: Protecting our users' privacy and data is our highest priority.
Speaker 3: T is taking every necessary step to ensure the security
Speaker 3: of our platform and prevent further exposure. The spokesperson said,
Speaker 3: I don't know. I don't know how much further the
Speaker 3: exposure could be. They basically got everything up to government
Speaker 3: IDs you had stored there.
Speaker 4: What more hypocrisy and irony of it is what gets me.
Speaker 4: It's they're all upset because their photos were leaked without
Speaker 4: their permission. On the app where they share photos of
Speaker 4: people taken without their permission. It's funny. They're all about
Speaker 4: protecting their users' privacy quote unquote, even though they were
Speaker 4: just storing it in a publicly accessible or well, but
Speaker 4: their app is all about destroying other people's privacy. They
Speaker 4: literally have facial recognition to look to see if someone
Speaker 4: has uploaded a photo of someone else before, so that
Speaker 4: you can get all the notes that they have of
Speaker 4: that person.
Speaker 3: Wow, the app has angered some men. In prompt ay
Speaker 3: thread Thursday evening on the right wing troll message board
Speaker 3: four chan, Yes, the hacker known as four chan has
Speaker 3: struck again and which users called for a hack and
Speaker 3: leak campaign. The company became aware of the incident, which
Speaker 3: first reported by four h four media early Friday.
Speaker 1: The spokesperson said a four.
Speaker 3: Chan user posted a link Friday morning allegedly allowing people
Speaker 3: to download the database of stolen images and troves of
Speaker 3: alleged victims. Identification photos have been posted on four chan
Speaker 3: and x. NBC News has not verified the authenticity of
Speaker 3: the photos or their provenance.
Speaker 1: Yeah, if you're on.
Speaker 3: X at all, there's people continually posting about this. People
Speaker 3: always anytime something like this happens, you're immediately going to
Speaker 3: see and all over the place. Yeah, this is no exception,
Speaker 3: and these women's images are now basically a global phenomenon.
Speaker 3: Do not go downloading up. I'm sure there's some kind
Speaker 3: of legal repercussions for that, but they are out there
Speaker 3: and they are now going to be out there forever.
Speaker 3: There is no getting this stuff back. And Google Map's
Speaker 3: a user has created a map that purports to show
Speaker 3: the locations of ta users that were affected by the hack,
Speaker 3: though there are no names attached to the coordinates. Posted
Speaker 3: tabs creator Sean Cook, you'll notice it's a man said
Speaker 3: on its website that he was inspired after he watched
Speaker 3: his mother's terrifying experience with online dating, including being catfished
Speaker 3: and knowingly dating men with criminal records. I'm sure that
Speaker 3: there that you can't have scary experiences and that there
Speaker 3: are a lot of very strange people you can encounter,
Speaker 3: but creating a full on gossip app seems a little
Speaker 3: bit extreme. Some men online have expressed an online posts
Speaker 3: that they fear being misrepresented or doxed on the platform,
Speaker 3: and again they didn't give their permission for their photos
Speaker 3: and things to be posted and I'm sure a lot
Speaker 3: of these guys are not guilty of committing crimes. Perhaps
Speaker 3: they were just strange, perhaps they don't come across well,
Speaker 3: and now they're being exposed online for not having the
Speaker 3: most sparkling personality or not taking someone on the best date.
Speaker 4: Also, anyone can post anything about anyone un honestly.
Speaker 3: So if someone if a woman has a vendetta against
Speaker 3: you for some reason, she can go on there and
Speaker 3: make all kinds of claims. Raise concerns that the app
Speaker 3: could lead to harmful cyberbullying, unrelated to actual safety concerns. Again,
Speaker 3: I'm not concerned about cyber bullying. If someone is going
Speaker 3: online and saying mean things about you directly to you,
Speaker 3: trying to get a reaction out of you, don't react
Speaker 3: and don't engage. If they're trying to upset you, just
Speaker 3: ignore them, walk away, don't don't deal with them. That's
Speaker 3: the simple post. I'm not worried about cyber bullying. What's
Speaker 3: scary is the fact that they could engage in a
Speaker 3: smear campaign, just slander and libel people. In a few
Speaker 3: online forums, Ben uploaded the idea of creating their own
Speaker 3: men only version of the app is payback for women's
Speaker 3: use of tea. One such app, called Tea Born, quickly
Speaker 3: ignited backlash after its creator colld users out for posting
Speaker 3: revenge porn. The app is now removed from the app store. Yeah,
Speaker 3: that's that's illegal.
Speaker 1: They will charge you with a crime. Don't do that.
Speaker 1: Don't do not.
Speaker 3: The app set an Instagram story that new sign ups
Speaker 3: have surpassed two million in the past few days. Many
Speaker 3: who have posted on the apps Instagram page that they're
Speaker 3: made on the apps wait list. By Friday, several commentators
Speaker 3: has also. Commentators had also started expressing concerns about their
Speaker 3: data privacy in the wake of the hacking news. All
Speaker 3: this because people wanted to gossip. That's kind of the
Speaker 3: takeaway here, was it worth it? Did you get enough?
Speaker 3: I don't know what the metrics on tr but I'm
Speaker 3: sure there's some kind of like engagement system. There always
Speaker 3: has to be. It's what drives the dopamine drip. Oh look,
Speaker 3: I posted this thing about this guy, and all these
Speaker 3: other women commented on it saying thank you, thanks for
Speaker 3: warning me. Minute man militia. Also, someone exaggerate these things
Speaker 3: or think something is weird about a guy, which can
Speaker 3: be innate. Yeah, it's a The dating modern dating scene
Speaker 3: is pretty tragic, it's pretty awful.
Speaker 4: There are of course, it's gonna get worse if this
Speaker 4: app continues to rise in popularity. Of something that you
Speaker 4: say that's weird, that gets put on your permanent record,
Speaker 4: and now every time they scan your face you'll get
Speaker 4: the dystopian social credit dating score.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a.
Speaker 3: He made some off color comments, he made a joke
Speaker 3: I didn't like. He's racist, he's sexist, he's this, he's that.
Speaker 4: And if they're this casual with the data from their users,
Speaker 4: with their state IDs and everything, how cautious do you
Speaker 4: think they're being with the data of the victims of
Speaker 4: the app, the people that they're uploading the photos of.
Speaker 3: Yeah, t app leak shows why UK's digital ID verification
Speaker 3: laws are dangerous.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: You force these companies to collect their government issued IDs
Speaker 3: and you store them in an unprotected, unsecured place where
Speaker 3: anyone can find them. Of course, again they're saying that
Speaker 3: this was from before twenty twenty four and that they.
Speaker 1: Upgraded their security.
Speaker 3: The question is why was this their solution at all
Speaker 3: at any time? This was obviously a terrible idea. This
Speaker 3: was obviously always going to end this way. And even
Speaker 3: if you know this was, why didn't you migrate this data?
Speaker 3: Why didn't you delete it after you had the opportunity
Speaker 3: to increase security? These companies do not care. It was
Speaker 3: probably expensive to do that, and they just looked at
Speaker 3: it like, eh, we'll get to it eventually one day, maybe.
Speaker 1: A Syrian girl.
Speaker 3: How would this vicious app be viewed if it were
Speaker 3: reverse men saying mean things about toxic women they have dated?
Speaker 4: Not?
Speaker 3: Well, I think yeah, probably not. Women have kind of
Speaker 3: carte blanc in this day and age to be a
Speaker 3: savage and ruthless towards men as they want, since you know,
Speaker 3: it's seen as well, you know, men are The feminists
Speaker 3: have this weird conundrum where they both want to portray
Speaker 3: women as being perfectly equal to men at all times
Speaker 3: in all things, but then always act like, well, men
Speaker 3: are bigger and stronger, and therefore women have to live
Speaker 3: in fear of them continually, and every man is a
Speaker 3: potential you know, threat to them at all times, and
Speaker 3: it's just this weird flux state. The Online Safety Act
Speaker 3: is actually a threat.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The UK's Online Safety.
Speaker 3: Act legislation marketed as a safety net for children was
Speaker 3: rolled out with all the foresight of a toddler launching
Speaker 3: a space program. Now any site hosting potentially harmful content
Speaker 3: could be required to collect real world ID, face scans
Speaker 3: or official documents from users, And if more websites are
Speaker 3: forced to do this, then this kind of thing is
Speaker 3: going to become the norm. Companies, even if they secure them,
Speaker 3: nothing that you store online is perfectly secure. If a
Speaker 3: hacker decides, well, one sufficient skill decides they want this information,
Speaker 3: they don't care about the potential consequences. They're probably going
Speaker 3: to get it if they devote themselves to it. Well,
Speaker 3: what could go wrong? Ask t the women centric dating
Speaker 3: app that went viral by promising empowerment and face planned
Speaker 3: it into one of the most dangerous data breaches.
Speaker 4: Of the year.
Speaker 3: Their fire based server housing tens of thousands of selfies
Speaker 3: and government issued IDs was left wide open to anyone
Speaker 3: with a link. That's right, as I've said, it wasn't encrypted.
Speaker 1: You didn't even need a password or username. It was
Speaker 1: just there.
Speaker 3: If you had the link, you could access it and
Speaker 3: download these files. It's this is the real world consequence
Speaker 3: of lawmakers selling digital ID mandates as a solution to
Speaker 3: online harm private companies getting access to sensitive personal data
Speaker 3: with all the discretion of a parade float, and then
Speaker 3: dropping it into the lapse of the entire Internet. It's
Speaker 3: paused for a moment and appreciate the cosmic genius it
Speaker 3: takes to build an app allegedly designed to protect women
Speaker 3: and then expose all of their private data to the
Speaker 3: world with the finesse of a first time hacker copying
Speaker 3: a URL. That's right, it took no skill. You didn't
Speaker 3: have to know anything about hacking. I don't know any
Speaker 3: of the terms, so I'm not going to try to it.
Speaker 1: But you don't.
Speaker 3: You don't have to imagine the guy the typical hacking
Speaker 3: scene from any Hollywood movie where he's sitting there typing rapidly.
Speaker 3: The guy just copy and past at a URL in Tee,
Speaker 3: the dating app that rocketed to the top of the
Speaker 3: app store by selling anonymity, safety, and empowerment, before face
Speaker 3: planting into the fire based server floor, spraying driver's licenses
Speaker 3: and selfies like a busted confetti cannon. If you missed it,
Speaker 3: here's the elevator pitch from the seventh Circle of Info.
Speaker 3: Sac hell t lets women upload photos, names, and backstories
Speaker 3: of men they're dating or avoiding, tagging them as green
Speaker 3: flags or red flags, like they're judging a homecoming parade.
Speaker 3: My question is, if you're dating some guy, why would
Speaker 3: you be posting his green flags? So isn't that just
Speaker 3: like saying, please come try to steal this guy I'm dating.
Speaker 1: He's great, he's wonderful.
Speaker 3: Why are you posting this to women who are ostensibly
Speaker 3: only looking for someone to date them? I suppose that
Speaker 3: seems like it seems as if it would be counterintuitive.
Speaker 3: I'm not understanding the thought process here. This was already
Speaker 3: a privacy demolition derby waiting to happen. Or also the
Speaker 3: fact that even if he is a green flag, if
Speaker 3: he broke up with you, chances are these people are
Speaker 3: not gonna have many good feelings about it.
Speaker 1: I'm not understanding.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I don't think posting green flags is really the
Speaker 4: point of the op.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that seems like you're just attacked on feature like
Speaker 3: and you can do this, sure, why not.
Speaker 4: Make it seem less vicious?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 3: No, it's not all about complaining about men and posting
Speaker 3: how horrible they are, say how good they are too.
Speaker 3: I'd like to know the ratio of green flag posts,
Speaker 3: a red flag posts, not calling for any hacking. I'd
Speaker 3: just be curious. I'm not going to look into it.
Speaker 3: The tea wasn't satisfied with sketchy, crowdsourced accusations and anonymous
Speaker 3: call outs. It had a bigger goal making sure only
Speaker 3: verified women could participate, only verified women. The trans community
Speaker 3: is seething right now. They're furious.
Speaker 1: I'm sure.
Speaker 4: Not necessarily I was trying to put on the board,
Speaker 4: but there's pictures of people, you know, with beards, just
Speaker 4: wearing an obvious wig.
Speaker 1: Hello, Hello, it is me a woman. Let me in.
Speaker 3: And how do you verify womanhood in the twenty first century.
Speaker 3: We've been arguing about that for a few years now. Actually, naturally,
Speaker 3: you demand a selfie and a government issued ID. Nothing
Speaker 3: says safe space like giving your face and passport to
Speaker 3: a buzzy gossip app run by people who store it
Speaker 3: in a pubbly accessible firebase bucket. No login, no password,
Speaker 3: no shame. The data leak erupted users on four Chan
Speaker 3: stumbled across the open database and wasted no time slurping
Speaker 3: up tens of thousands of selfies, driver's licenses, and even
Speaker 3: private messages. No encryption, no metadata, no metadata scrubbing. Some
Speaker 3: uploads still contained geolocation data, meaning anyone who clicked submit
Speaker 3: had essentially handed over a real time breadcrumb trail to
Speaker 3: their front door. You can see this photo there. This
Speaker 3: is from somebody named Crypto Siberia Lane on the blockchain.
Speaker 3: I guess the t app also stored GPS location for signups.
Speaker 1: Lol.
Speaker 3: When you think it couldn't get much worse, my homie
Speaker 3: actually created these maps apparently, and I didn't even know
Speaker 3: until like five minutes ago.
Speaker 1: Lawsuit.
Speaker 3: When yeah, I imagine there is a lawsuit coming. I
Speaker 3: imagine it's going to be a big one. Lane on
Speaker 3: the blockchain name it's a referencing an anime called Serial
Speaker 3: Experiments Lane. The fallout was immediate. At least one of
Speaker 3: the IDs allegedly belonged to a Department of Defense employee,
Speaker 3: according to social media posts that are now circulating with
Speaker 3: gleeful schadenfreude of digital voyeurs. Department of Defense employee.
Speaker 1: Yes that's what we want.
Speaker 3: We want our DoD employees on gossip apps complaining, Oh
Speaker 3: they didn't we live in such a silly time. Tea
Speaker 3: scrambled out a statement at six forty four am on
Speaker 3: July twenty fifth, claiming the breach effected a legacy system
Speaker 3: with data from over two years ago. Well, isn't that wonderful.
Speaker 3: Over two years ago doesn't help those tens of thousands
Speaker 3: of people that have been.
Speaker 4: Don't worry. It's just data from people over two years ago.
Speaker 4: We don't save data.
Speaker 3: By the way, We would never save your data except
Speaker 3: for this data that we saved. We always want this
Speaker 3: is their statement t app users. We always want this
Speaker 3: place to feel the space, to feel transparent.
Speaker 1: Oh, it was very transparent.
Speaker 3: It was so transparent you turned over government issued IDs.
Speaker 4: The transparency was kind of the whole problem.
Speaker 3: Yeah, to people, to hackers, I don't even feel comfortable
Speaker 3: calling this a hack.
Speaker 1: This wasn't a hack.
Speaker 3: A hack implies you know some level of either you
Speaker 3: know virtual you know cyber know how to bypass systems,
Speaker 3: or social engineering to get passwords. This was just incompetence
Speaker 3: on the company's part. There was no hacking required. They
Speaker 3: didn't have to go in and social engineer by calling
Speaker 3: up and pretending to be someone else and needing some
Speaker 3: kind of verification, YadA YadA. They didn't run some kind
Speaker 3: of program that scraped data or passwords from somewhere they
Speaker 3: simply found a URL.
Speaker 1: This isn't a hack.
Speaker 3: It might have been in maybe an Easter egg hunt
Speaker 3: or a scavenger hunt. That's about it, and our community
Speaker 3: is our first priority. There's a lot of misinformation circulating,
Speaker 3: so please take a moment to read. Here's what you
Speaker 3: need to know. Yes, they're going to be completely honest
Speaker 3: with you. This company that stands to lose who knows
Speaker 3: how much money. We discovered unauthorized access to an archive
Speaker 3: data system. If you signed up for Tea after February
Speaker 3: twenty twenty four, all.
Speaker 1: Your data is secure.
Speaker 3: This archive system stored about seventy two thousand users submitted images,
Speaker 3: including approximately thirteen thousand images of selfies and selfies including
Speaker 3: photo identification submitted during account verification. These photos can in
Speaker 3: no way be linked to posts within t and again
Speaker 3: that's what they say. I assume it can't be just
Speaker 3: because no one has come out saying they've done it yet,
Speaker 3: but still Additionally, fifty nine thousand images publicly viewable in
Speaker 3: the app from posts, comments, and direct messages from over
Speaker 3: two years ago we're accessed. This data was stored to
Speaker 3: meet law enforcement standards around cyber bullying prevention. Cyber bullying prevention.
Speaker 3: We've acted fast, and we're working with some of the
Speaker 3: most trusted cybersecurity experts for more information. Please, it's too late,
Speaker 3: we've acted fat. You have to just if you're forced
Speaker 3: to keep that data, you need to immediately migrate it
Speaker 3: to a secure server and just delete that page. But
Speaker 3: at this point, there's nothing anyone with cybersecurity info can do.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter.
Speaker 3: You could have the greatest expert on the planet, what
Speaker 3: is he going to do? Hack the thousands of people
Speaker 3: that have downloaded this data, Hack every website where it's
Speaker 3: stored now and delete it.
Speaker 1: There's no point. It's too late.
Speaker 4: And again just the hypocrisy of this. Where are cyber
Speaker 4: bullying prevention? They're literally an app all about cyber bullying.
Speaker 3: We're here to complain and moan about men. But of
Speaker 3: course Tea's entire pitch to women was that it created
Speaker 3: a safer dating ecosystem by weeding out imposts and creeps
Speaker 3: through ID based gatekeeping. But as it turns out, the
Speaker 3: real danger wasn't the guy with the red flag tag,
Speaker 3: was the company itself that built a high value honeypot
Speaker 3: of sensitive personal information and forgot to put a lid
Speaker 3: on it. Teas disasters, less standalone embarrassment and more like
Speaker 3: a blinking red billboard advertising the idiocy of digital ID
Speaker 3: verification as a privacy safeguard. Yeah, as I said, any
Speaker 3: info that's accessible through the web is up for hack.
Speaker 3: Nothing online is truly secure. If someone wants to gain
Speaker 3: access to it, chances are they will or somebody will.
Speaker 3: These systems are never secure. The idea sounds good in
Speaker 3: committee rooms and on tech conference stages. Require young people
Speaker 3: to upload real ID to confirm their identity online and
Speaker 3: the t rolls vanished, The bots disintegrate, and your app
Speaker 3: becomes a utopia of civil discourse and polite dating. Except no,
Speaker 3: what you actually get is a surveillance regime that centralizes
Speaker 3: priceless identity data and systems so brittle they buckle under
Speaker 3: the weight of a URL request. He didn't suffer a
Speaker 3: breach because of a masterful hack. It got busted because
Speaker 3: it left the front door open and taped the key
Speaker 3: to the welcome mat. They took no precautions. Again, it
Speaker 3: was literally publicly accessible if you had the URL.
Speaker 4: There wasn't any encryption, It wasn't behind any firewalls. It
Speaker 4: was just right there.
Speaker 3: Once you clicked, once you went in, put the URL,
Speaker 3: it took you to this database and you could view everything.
Speaker 3: Mistakes always happen, and hacks are common, which is why
Speaker 3: platforms should be collecting as little data as possible, and
Speaker 3: digital ID requirements are a dangerous idea.
Speaker 1: Yeah, do you.
Speaker 3: Really think someplace like Facebook or X or Discord or
Speaker 3: any of these are companies you really want having access
Speaker 3: to your driver's license or passport or whatever form of
Speaker 3: ID you utilize.
Speaker 4: And it's not just going to be the big companies
Speaker 4: that you mentioned of Facebook and whatnot. It's going to
Speaker 4: be a bunch of websites. You know, my website scattered
Speaker 4: across hundreds of websites. It's only a matter of time
Speaker 4: before one of them gets breached.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and even if let's say Facebook X, the large
Speaker 3: ones can keep your ID safe. They can pay enough
Speaker 3: money to have cybersecurity that will keep people out and
Speaker 3: they continue to update it as you know, hack tactics evolve.
Speaker 3: The smaller websites aren't going to have that. They're not
Speaker 3: going to have the luxury of that.
Speaker 4: Yes, and your data will be stored in these websites
Speaker 4: they're marketing it as anti porn, but it's their definition
Speaker 4: of what is an adult website is extremely loose, as
Speaker 4: it includes things like discord to use all the time.
Speaker 4: You know, it's just a messaging service. There's people point
Speaker 4: out that a stop smoking recovery forum was blacklisted, so
Speaker 4: people under eighteen can't access that, and if you are
Speaker 4: over eighteen, you still have to submit your data. Support
Speaker 4: groups for sexual assault victims are now gated.
Speaker 1: That's great.
Speaker 3: So these sexual assault victims are going to have to
Speaker 3: have their IDs online and this group could get hacked,
Speaker 3: potentially leaking the information of these women who have been victimized,
Speaker 3: potentially trying to stay hidden from the people who victimize them,
Speaker 3: and then their information gets leaked and will become your
Speaker 3: government ID with your address could be leaked as a
Speaker 3: sexual assault. Because is that wonderful? And it's not like
Speaker 3: this practice is going away, it's being enshrined into law.
Speaker 3: The UK's shiny New Online Safety Act is a sort
Speaker 3: of performative legislation that gives regulators a warm feeling without
Speaker 3: the burden of logic. And if we burdened our regulators
Speaker 3: with logic, they'd never get anything done. Tea's breach is
Speaker 3: a preview.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 3: This is what is going to happen more and more frequently.
Speaker 3: Is more of these places require it require you to
Speaker 3: have your ID stored online. The defenders of digital ID
Speaker 3: verification like to use words like trust protection and authenticity.
Speaker 3: They don't mention is what happens when things go wrong.
Speaker 3: IDs are a lifetime acts are lifetime access tokens to
Speaker 3: your real world identity. You can't revoke your face. You
Speaker 3: can't replace your Social Security number. Every time a startup
Speaker 3: forgets to set its permissions. Yeah, you are then a
Speaker 3: known quantity everyone as your info. Nights of the Storm.
Speaker 3: I've pointed this out for years. Everything is saved, required
Speaker 3: by certain laws. I've learned this when I was a
Speaker 3: system's admin for a cable internet company. Your email has
Speaker 3: to be saved for several years in case it's required
Speaker 3: for an investigation. Yeah, they store all this data and
Speaker 3: leave it not necessarily like t did, completely open to
Speaker 3: the public, but it's still available if someone is crafty enough.
Speaker 3: We had an email for our users and had to
Speaker 3: stay in compliance. We had copies of everything. Yeah, all
Speaker 3: these companies have so much information just waiting for someone
Speaker 3: to find ways to get it. I mean, I don't
Speaker 3: know how many times I've gotten an email from some
Speaker 3: website that they force you to create an account when
Speaker 3: you do something there, and then I forget it exists,
Speaker 3: and later they send me an email your account has
Speaker 3: been breached. Please change your password. It's like great, great,
Speaker 3: First you forced me to sign up and create an
Speaker 3: account to use your system, whether I'm purchasing something or
Speaker 3: what have you, and you can't keep it safe. This
Speaker 3: is wonderful. Denver Ataway. Think of the Internet and the
Speaker 3: IoT as one contiguous data sipe in each app, and
Speaker 3: we are in an era of the consolidation of these
Speaker 3: resources to feed whatever agenda, who shapes and controls maintains
Speaker 3: the bullet points and action plans of driving technocracy. Yep,
Speaker 3: this is the chilling effect built into the bones of
Speaker 3: legislation like the Online Safety Act. Lawmakers are trading constitutional
Speaker 3: principles for press release optics, and users are stuck in
Speaker 3: a reality where privacy is painted as a threat to safety.
Speaker 1: Instead of its foundation.
Speaker 3: See you collected seventy two thousand images selfies and IDs
Speaker 3: dump them into an open firebas bucket like it was
Speaker 3: saving screenshots from a group chat. So don't upload your
Speaker 3: passport to join a chat room, don't submit a face
Speaker 3: scan to access a site. Don't trust that trendy app
Speaker 3: found it last year with your boy biometric data.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 3: Do not give these people your information.
Speaker 1: They will lose it.
Speaker 3: Nights to the storm. I think we will see digital
Speaker 3: ID within this administration. I think that's the way it's going.
Speaker 1: I would not be surprised.
Speaker 4: A push for that right now. I imagine you have that.
Speaker 1: In your stack, Shelley A.
Speaker 3: Never accept terms, Never use anything that requires your phone
Speaker 3: number or ID if you can avoid it absolutely, if
Speaker 3: you don't have to, if it's not something you absolutely
Speaker 3: need to do, then do not give your info out.
Speaker 3: These companies are not interested in protecting it. The UK's
Speaker 3: Online Safety Act is already causing problems to be hidden,
Speaker 3: causing protests.
Speaker 1: Excuse me.
Speaker 3: UK's Online Safety Act is already causing protests to be hidden.
Speaker 3: They are using this, Oh, we need to keep miners
Speaker 3: from seeing these, you know, we don't want miners seeing
Speaker 3: violence content that we find questionable. And so now they're
Speaker 3: able to go in there and say, well, we don't
Speaker 3: know how old you are. We don't know for sure,
Speaker 3: so you don't get to see these protests that are happening,
Speaker 3: these people that are standing up to the government.
Speaker 4: It's worth pointing up they did this the first day
Speaker 4: it was passed. They passed this under the whole excuse
Speaker 4: of we've got to protect the children from porn, and
Speaker 4: the very first day, less than twelve hours after it
Speaker 4: was passed, they're blocking stuff related to protests against illegal
Speaker 4: migration and stuff outside of immigrant hotels.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and of.
Speaker 4: Course if you want to see that, even as an adult,
Speaker 4: you've got to register, you've got to put in your ID,
Speaker 4: you've got to be put on a list as having
Speaker 4: viewed this information. And children also should be able to
Speaker 4: educate themselves about politics.
Speaker 3: People teenagers British users attempting to view videos of anti
Speaker 3: mass migration protests on x found themselves blocked on Friday,
Speaker 3: coinciding with the day the UK Sweeping Online Safety Act
Speaker 3: took effect. Isn't that funny? Wow, they just had this
Speaker 3: ready to go. Legislation is already being condemned or facilitating
Speaker 3: online censorship under the veil of child protection. Although sold
Speaker 3: to the public as a safeguard against miners encountering explicit content.
Speaker 3: The enforcement mechanisms are now being used to restrict access
Speaker 3: to politically charged material. Well, when you look at it,
Speaker 3: anytime the government says this is to protect children, look
Speaker 3: at what they want to push on children. They want
Speaker 3: to push homosexuality, transgenderism, separate them from their parents.
Speaker 4: Protecting the children is another macgovern to them.
Speaker 3: They have no interest in protecting children. It is always
Speaker 3: a way to get you.
Speaker 1: To accept something.
Speaker 3: Oh well, it's to protect children. I can't you know,
Speaker 3: I can't be against it. It's for the children. It
Speaker 3: is always a scheme.
Speaker 4: And everyone who's paying attention knows that they're going to
Speaker 4: go after free speech. But the funny thing is they
Speaker 4: didn't bother wasting any time, like slowly boiling the frog.
Speaker 4: They just went straight forward. The second it's past, it's
Speaker 4: saw colin. This wasn't even a slippery slope. It was
Speaker 4: just a sheer clip.
Speaker 3: They stepped off and wily coyoted right into the ground below.
Speaker 3: The protests and question were sparks by outrage over an
Speaker 3: incident and epping were a migrant and allegedly sexually assaulted
Speaker 3: a fourteen year old girl while living in a taxpayer
Speaker 3: funded hotel. Demonstrations followed swiftly. But footage of these events
Speaker 3: is now being filtered from UK audiences.
Speaker 1: Well that's right.
Speaker 3: They can't have you knowing not only that this happened
Speaker 3: to this poor girl, but that people are actually standing
Speaker 3: up and protesting it.
Speaker 4: Hey, all, the migrant rapes is a very adult topic.
Speaker 4: You wouldn't want people finding out about that. If you
Speaker 4: want to learn about that, you got to put your
Speaker 4: ID in the government database.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so they can put you on a list. Oh,
Speaker 3: this guy doesn't like the migrant crisis. He doesn't like
Speaker 3: the fact that you know they're raping our women and children.
Speaker 3: Well he's going on a list, buddy, you better believe it.
Speaker 3: Users attempting to access the protest content we're met with
Speaker 3: a message stating, due to local laws, we are temporarily
Speaker 3: restricting access to this content until X estimates your age.
Speaker 3: The restricted material reportedly included scenes of arrests and clashes
Speaker 3: during the protests, not the kind of content the law
Speaker 3: claimed to target. Well, oh, funny overreach. No, the government
Speaker 3: would never do that. Got this tweet here or whatever
Speaker 3: you call a post on X these days? The Online
Speaker 3: Safety Act came into effect on Friday, twenty fifth July,
Speaker 3: and we are already seeing the impact on free speech.
Speaker 3: My earlier post displaying police brutality involving six officers arresting
Speaker 3: a single mail the no to mass immigration protests and leads,
Speaker 3: has been heavily censored across the platform, with thousands of
Speaker 3: users being blocked from seeing the content. Why is this
Speaker 3: is this? How is this now the end of free
Speaker 3: speech on x? What does this mean for Britain? Moreover,
Speaker 3: are we now living in a North Korean or CCP
Speaker 3: style oppressive dictatorship? The country being at possibly the most
Speaker 3: critical moment in our history, it is imperative now more
Speaker 3: than ever that we fight for our right to speak
Speaker 3: openly and to criticize this government and its tyranny. Surely
Speaker 3: this goes against everything you stand for at Elon Musk. Surely,
Speaker 3: I mean, I know you've complied with everyone else's calls
Speaker 3: for specific types of censorship before, but surely you.
Speaker 1: Support free speech. These people, they don't learn. So look
Speaker 1: at nineteen eighty.
Speaker 3: I don't trust any company to keep my data private,
Speaker 3: even if they say they will. Many profit from selling
Speaker 3: the data. That is as bad as getting head. Yeah,
Speaker 3: many companies just flat out sell it.
Speaker 5: You give it to.
Speaker 3: Them, and then somewhere in their eula they have it
Speaker 3: written down, Oh, by the way, we can sell your data,
Speaker 3: and they do as Syrian girl. Wouldn't want children to
Speaker 3: learn that migrants were raping and attacking people. That might
Speaker 3: cause them to be careful and protect themselves, that's right.
Speaker 1: Can't have that.
Speaker 3: We don't want these children to learn who's victimizing them.
Speaker 3: Can't have them taking precautions to avoid certain types of
Speaker 3: people that would be racist. To meet the laws requirements,
Speaker 3: X has implemented various age estimation strategies. These techniques, originally
Speaker 3: framed as tools to shield miners from graphic material, are
Speaker 3: now being used to restrict access to politically relevant video.
Speaker 3: The company's facing penalties of up to eighteen million eighteen
Speaker 3: million pounds that's twenty four million dollars or ten percent
Speaker 3: of their global revenue. Platforms are expected to air heavily
Speaker 3: on the side of caution. Yeah, they're not going to
Speaker 3: give up ten percent revenue in the hopes of maintaining
Speaker 3: free speech. We're going to take a quick break. We
Speaker 3: are going to continue with free speech and deplatforming when
Speaker 3: we come back.
Speaker 6: So stay with us.
Speaker 2: Defending the American dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 7: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
Speaker 7: these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
Speaker 7: all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
Speaker 7: And I could if only David Knight would send me
Speaker 7: one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
Speaker 7: black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But
Speaker 7: he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
Speaker 7: American suckers can buy me some. At the Davidknightshow dot com.
Speaker 7: You should be able to buy me several hundred. Those
Speaker 7: amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful, I'd wear
Speaker 7: something other than green military cosplay to my various.
Speaker 5: Gallas and social events.
Speaker 7: If you want to save on shipping, just put it
Speaker 7: in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from
Speaker 7: the USA.
Speaker 1: Welcome back, folks.
Speaker 3: We've got a lot of comments out e MRR. The
Speaker 3: manufactured migrant crisis is a pathway to global digital ID
Speaker 3: you know, to keep them out of the country. Yeah,
Speaker 3: of course, unif a crisis is real. Whatever they're suggesting
Speaker 3: isn't necessarily the solution, And it's always the same solutions
Speaker 3: from these people, just another way of pushing towards the
Speaker 3: total digital panopticon where they know everything about you all
Speaker 3: the time.
Speaker 4: Yeah, they can use real problems for them maguffins just
Speaker 4: as easily as they can use fake problems. Inaact even better,
Speaker 4: Just look at the solutions to see if it's the
Speaker 4: same solutions they push for everything.
Speaker 1: It's always the same solution.
Speaker 3: Oh, by the way, did you know that for this problem,
Speaker 3: if you just give us all your data, it would
Speaker 3: fix it. Oh funny, this problem over here has the
Speaker 3: same exact solution. Funny how that keeps cropping up? Shelley,
Speaker 3: Just keep using these systems. The new money is your data.
Speaker 3: Stop feeding these criminals, yeah, Nibau twenty twenty nine. Emperor
Speaker 3: Caligula Trump is a full partner in one of the
Speaker 3: world's largest biometric ID companies. He's not a friend of
Speaker 3: the people, never has been, never will be.
Speaker 1: Nice of the storm.
Speaker 4: Of course, there's a new bill that's being pushed in
Speaker 4: the US that's identical to the child safety bill that
Speaker 4: they just passed in uh Britain, and another thing in
Speaker 4: the UK it's a global push.
Speaker 1: Yeah, nice of the storm.
Speaker 3: I to sign up with IDT me to access my
Speaker 3: VA stuff online and to do my taxes two years ago.
Speaker 3: And we all know how efficient and wonderful the VA is.
Speaker 3: I'm sure they would never accidentally leak data.
Speaker 1: Audi mr R.
Speaker 3: Public welfare has always been the alibi of tyrants.
Speaker 1: It's a quote from Albert.
Speaker 3: Camis KWD sixty eight. Children are a prop to the elite,
Speaker 3: a propaganda tool.
Speaker 1: Yes they are.
Speaker 3: They continually use the refrain, think about the children, and
Speaker 3: then when you ask them what they want to do
Speaker 3: with the children, it turns out they want to trans
Speaker 3: them and mutilate them. They don't care about children.
Speaker 4: It's another thing like the uh put on your mask
Speaker 4: when or killing grandma. They don't care about grandma and
Speaker 4: the mask isn't going.
Speaker 3: To help give up your privacy or you hate children night.
Speaker 3: So the storm pretty easy to protect children if you
Speaker 3: just don't give them a device. Yeah, all these parents
Speaker 3: are always my child is being cyberbullied, we have to
Speaker 3: do something about it. Get them off the internet. If
Speaker 3: your child is being cyberbullied, get them off the internet.
Speaker 3: Take the device away from them. I guarantee you these
Speaker 3: people that are on the internet are not going to
Speaker 3: drive or fly to your house, stand outside with a
Speaker 3: sign and continue to harass your child.
Speaker 4: No amount of legislation can replace good parenting or sympathize
Speaker 4: it in any way.
Speaker 3: Sixty eight families that are intact and parents that would
Speaker 3: protect children would be a good start too.
Speaker 5: Few.
Speaker 3: Now, Yeah, the the American family has been destroyed. It
Speaker 3: has been under attack for decades now, and they have
Speaker 3: done a very good job of making it a shell
Speaker 3: of its former self. Con think, thank you very much.
Speaker 3: We appreciate that. When are we getting the Lance Cam?
Speaker 3: Maybe we're an anonymous mask. We're working on it. We'll
Speaker 3: have the We'll have them in there, you know, cloaked
Speaker 3: and shadowed, wearing a mask of some kind.
Speaker 4: It would prevent me from doing the show with bad head,
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 3: You'd have to, you know, not be in there with
Speaker 3: the hair all over the place. Freedom Convoy Lawyer d
Speaker 3: banked by Royal Bank of Canada, no charges, no violations,
Speaker 3: just a severate account and a vanishing explanation. The censorship
Speaker 3: by the financial sector is continuing to move on. This
Speaker 3: is how they target people. They really don't like they
Speaker 3: did that with us with PayPal right after the show
Speaker 3: started in twenty twenty one, About five months in, they
Speaker 3: just terminated the account. My dad never got an answer
Speaker 3: onto why it was. The PayPal reps just kept saying, Yeah,
Speaker 3: that's strange. I don't have any information about it.
Speaker 1: I don't. They're not telling me why.
Speaker 3: This is what they do when you've really annoyed them.
Speaker 1: They remove your ability.
Speaker 3: To earn money or move money.
Speaker 1: It's a tactic.
Speaker 3: They employ against many different people night to the Storm.
Speaker 3: The same will happen with CBDC. Yeah, and it'll be
Speaker 3: very easy Denver adaway the Online Safety Act. Don't you
Speaker 3: feel safer, you guys?
Speaker 1: Yes?
Speaker 3: Don't you feel safer having to turn over all of
Speaker 3: your personal data to every website? Feel safer knowing that
Speaker 3: you know your data is stored with these companies that
Speaker 3: don't really care whether it's protected or not. And even
Speaker 3: if they did care, the likelihood that they could keep
Speaker 3: it safe is very small kWt sixty eight. I always
Speaker 3: feel better with all the things the government does for me,
Speaker 3: especially Trump winning. That's right, I'm tired of winning. Royal
Speaker 3: Bank of Canada has severed its ties with EVA Chipuwick,
Speaker 3: a lawyer who played a high profile role during the
Speaker 3: Freedom Convoy protests, citing vague risk related concerns and giving
Speaker 3: her until mid August twenty twenty five to move her
Speaker 3: funds elsewhere.
Speaker 4: Severed their ties with is such a polite way of
Speaker 4: saying d banked.
Speaker 3: Risk related concerns to a very vague nothing statement. The
Speaker 3: transaction prompted a temporary freeze of her account and a
Speaker 3: series of questions she described as both strange and demeaning.
Speaker 3: Though the freeze was lifted after questioning, she was cautioned
Speaker 3: to tread carefully with cryptocurrency. Soon after her accounts were
Speaker 3: abruptly closed. The termination letter leaned heavily on regulatory obligations,
Speaker 3: stating we are no longer in a position to continue
Speaker 3: our banking relationship with you. Beyond that, no evidence of
Speaker 3: wrongdoing nor any specific policy violation was mentioned. This is
Speaker 3: how they operate. No, we're not gonna tell you what
Speaker 3: you did wrong. Really, you have to just deal with it.
Speaker 3: We're not required to tell you anything. That's the same
Speaker 3: thing that happened with our dad. They just terminated the account.
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 1: Sorry.
Speaker 3: Even the guy who's looking at it doesn't get any
Speaker 3: information about it. He seemed genuinely confused from.
Speaker 1: What I remember. Yeah, that's very strange. I don't get it.
Speaker 3: Well, it came down from the people higher up those
Speaker 3: on how I have decreed it so and they're not
Speaker 3: going to give anyone information Nights of the storm. We
Speaker 3: are rapidly approaching a time that you will not be
Speaker 3: able to take part in society without digital ID and CBDC.
Speaker 3: We need an alternate society outside of the digital system. Yeah,
Speaker 3: need to be able to have a community of people
Speaker 3: where you can get what you need and help them
Speaker 3: get what they need. Air Force investigating whether sig sour
Speaker 3: pistol was a factor in airman's death. The US Air
Speaker 3: Force Global Strike Command is sidelining the M eighteen modular
Speaker 3: handgun system with the death of an Air Force Security
Speaker 3: airmen at F E. Warrent Airbase, Wyoming. This happened on
Speaker 3: July twentieth. A lot of American gun manufacturers the quality control.
Speaker 1: Tanked over the years.
Speaker 3: Their designs got worse, and their ability to check if
Speaker 3: there was something wrong with the gun itself of.
Speaker 1: Or its ship got worse.
Speaker 3: This has resulted in a sort of quality apocalypse when
Speaker 3: it comes to American firearms, not every single company.
Speaker 1: Some of them still produce good ones, but.
Speaker 3: I remember people talking about SIG having dropped off in
Speaker 3: quality tremendously. A press release from the ninetieth Missile Wing
Speaker 3: Public Affairs Office on F. E. Warren provided no details
Speaker 3: of the incident. The Air Force Office of Special Investigations
Speaker 3: has the case and no details will be released at
Speaker 3: this time to protect the integrity of the investigation. According
Speaker 3: to the press release, the compact M eighteen and its
Speaker 3: full sized counterpart, the M seventeen, or the military and
Speaker 3: law enforcement variants of the sigsour P three to twenty.
Speaker 3: The Army selected SIG designs for the modular Handgun system
Speaker 3: in twenty seventeen. All branches of the US military subsequently
Speaker 3: adopted the pistols as their standard side arms that are
Speaker 3: of an abundance of caution and to ensure the safety
Speaker 3: and security of our personnel. The pause will remain in
Speaker 3: place pending the completion of comprehensive investigations by the Air Force,
Speaker 3: Hopmin wrote in an email to The Epoch Times. Pistol
Speaker 3: has been dogged for years by claims that it is
Speaker 3: prone to unintentional discharge if handled or bumped without the
Speaker 3: trigger being pulled. That's exactly what you want in a firearm, right,
Speaker 3: it just goes off.
Speaker 4: This is I mean, there's a lot of videos on
Speaker 4: the internet of SIG's doing exactly that. I just saw
Speaker 4: a video of this most recent one where the guy
Speaker 4: engages the trigger the slightest amount that he can, just
Speaker 4: a slight pull. There's still a lot of travel before
Speaker 4: it should fire, and he jiggles the slide a little
Speaker 4: bit and it goes off and he does that four
Speaker 4: times in a row.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that is That is a horrible safety concern. That
Speaker 3: speaks to terrible quality and just a bad design. You
Speaker 3: always used to see in those like eighties action movies
Speaker 3: where you know, some guy drops I think it's a
Speaker 3: lethal weapon where the guy drops an oozy or something
Speaker 3: and it goes spinning down the stairs and just keeps
Speaker 3: firing because you know, oh, well, it's hitting the ground,
Speaker 3: so therefore or it's going to go off. This might
Speaker 3: be one of the only guns in the world where
Speaker 3: if you do drop it and it bounces down the stairs,
Speaker 3: it might actually go off with each bounce. At least
Speaker 3: eighty people have been injured since twenty fourteen, and several
Speaker 3: lawsuits have been filed. In twenty twenty one, the US
Speaker 3: District Court for Eastern Pennsylvania dismissed a claim by an
Speaker 3: Immigration and Customs enforcement agent that is P. Three twenty
Speaker 3: discharged well in its holster, wounding him. Court ruled that
Speaker 3: the plant to failed to prove the pistol was flawed
Speaker 3: after the court rejected his expert witnesses. So they'll try
Speaker 3: to give you know, people standing to sue these gun
Speaker 3: manufacturers if their weapon is used in some kind of shooting.
Speaker 1: But if you bring expert.
Speaker 3: Witnesses into say hey, this gun went off in my holster,
Speaker 3: it's a bad design, they reject it.
Speaker 4: Well, it is just hard to believe because SIG had
Speaker 4: a great reputation for a long time, and people have
Speaker 4: known how to make guns that don't fire when you
Speaker 4: drop them for close to a century now.
Speaker 1: So it's we're going backwards.
Speaker 3: Knights of the Century, actually Knights of the storm. The
Speaker 3: Clarity Act gave control of Crypto to the government. Then
Speaker 3: the Genius Acts laid the framework for CBDC passed the
Speaker 3: day apart.
Speaker 1: Funny how that happens.
Speaker 3: Almost like there's some kind of plan, some kind of
Speaker 3: goal they're working towards I've read all those comments. In
Speaker 3: twenty twenty six, Hour paid an almost nine hundred thousand
Speaker 3: dollars settlement in a case before the US District Court
Speaker 3: for the Western District of Missouri, and court document sig
Speaker 3: Hours said its agreements to settle was not an admission
Speaker 3: of negligence or wrongdoing on its part. We didn't do
Speaker 3: anything wrong. We're just paying the sky nine hundred thousand
Speaker 3: dollars for reasons. Don't ask why, don't don't question it again.
Speaker 3: There are times where the cost of a lawsuit may
Speaker 3: be more than what they are going to pay out
Speaker 3: in a settlement. But considering this seems to be an
Speaker 3: ongoing problem, it seems more like this was a payment
Speaker 3: to get the lawsuit to stop. Look all right, we'll
Speaker 3: just give you some money. We don't want to risk
Speaker 3: you winning this thing. Knights of the Storm stable coins
Speaker 3: will come disguised as a government trusted crypto, but it's
Speaker 3: really CBDC. It's the same thing through a different channel.
Speaker 3: They very rarely only have one avenue of attack, and
Speaker 3: like having multiple different ways to get what they want.
Speaker 3: In August twenty twenty four, the FBI evaluated the pistol
Speaker 3: for the Michigan State Police after one of its officers
Speaker 3: reported that he was shot by his holstered P three
Speaker 3: twenty at the shooting range.
Speaker 1: You don't want that.
Speaker 3: You don't want it going off in your holster. The
Speaker 3: FBI report oft for no difinitive answers as to what
Speaker 3: happened in that case, but indicated the situation warranted a
Speaker 3: deeper investigation. Our examination of the subject weapon did not
Speaker 3: independently provide evidence of an uncommanded discharge. It does indicate
Speaker 3: that it may be possible. Report from the FBI's Ballistic
Speaker 3: Research Facility said. Subsequent to the latest FBI tests, the
Speaker 3: Michigan State Police adopted a different light slash holster combination
Speaker 3: and has completely fielded the Sigsaur pistol. Straighter wrote six
Speaker 3: hour has faith in the P three twenty platform that
Speaker 3: has consistently been proven to only fire when the trigger
Speaker 3: is pulled. It's been proven. It is known the Air
Speaker 3: Force would not identify the airman who was killed, saying
Speaker 3: Air Force policy is to withhold identification until twenty four
Speaker 3: hours after the next kin next of kin has been notified.
Speaker 3: America is going backwards when it comes to just about everything.
Speaker 3: We can't make a decent firearm anymore. We can't maintain
Speaker 3: our roads, we can't maintain our bridges.
Speaker 4: Well. Six hour is a German company, I believe, but
Speaker 4: they manufacture a lot of their guns in the US,
Speaker 4: so they're kind of against the are sort of American.
Speaker 3: Even the Germans can't manufacture properly anymore. When the Germans
Speaker 3: aren't doing good engineering, you've got a serious problem.
Speaker 4: They are really destroying their brand with this quality control,
Speaker 4: Like they used to have a really good name and
Speaker 4: they're devaluing. Like my say, that is one of the
Speaker 4: good ones.
Speaker 3: But or maybe it will rise in value. People will
Speaker 3: be nostalgic for the days when SIG was a quality brand,
Speaker 3: and as such they'll be going back and buying the
Speaker 3: old ones. Buddha Judge spent eighty billion on DEI, half
Speaker 3: the dot's budget, instead of upgrading air traffic control report.
Speaker 1: That's right, I'm sure he was.
Speaker 3: Sitting, we need more gaze in air traffic control? How
Speaker 3: do I get more guys like me in here? During
Speaker 3: his tenure, Budha Judge allegedly showed little intro in modernizing
Speaker 3: ATC systems. He was definitely pushing an agenda, said one
Speaker 3: industry official, Little to no interest was given to fixing
Speaker 3: the aging infrastructure, and definitely zero action was taken. They added,
Speaker 3: this is part of the reason we can't maintain our systems.
Speaker 3: We're not interested in hiring people that can actually do
Speaker 3: the job because as a general rule, the vast majority
Speaker 3: of people that want to do these types of jobs
Speaker 3: are white males. They happen to be the ones that
Speaker 3: really maintain the systems, and you can't have that. You've
Speaker 3: got to have DEI cutouts for different for women and
Speaker 3: other minorities. You've got to make sure that you have
Speaker 3: people in there.
Speaker 1: Just because.
Speaker 3: Tunnel Lord one three through seven, so that SIG has
Speaker 3: always been known for issues.
Speaker 4: Well, they have had a few runs of issues, like
Speaker 4: the P three sixty five on was first released, had
Speaker 4: a lot of problems, but then they addressed each of
Speaker 4: those problems fixed it. It's you know, been a few
Speaker 4: isolated things. This it's like across their UH product line
Speaker 4: is really going downhill. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Also, before I move on with what's going on with
Speaker 3: butter Judge Buddha, Judge, this is a good time to
Speaker 3: tell you that Homestead Products Dot Shop actually sells gun lube.
Speaker 3: So if you go to Homestead Products Dot shop and
Speaker 3: use promo code night for ten percent off, you can
Speaker 3: go look at all the other stuff they have. But
Speaker 3: if you're in the market for gun lub, you can
Speaker 3: give theirs a try see how it works out for you.
Speaker 3: And they have many, many other products over at Homestead
Speaker 3: Products dot Shop promo code night for ten percent off. Though,
Speaker 3: maybe if you have one of these SIGs, you don't
Speaker 3: want it oiled and running smoothly. Perhaps you want some
Speaker 3: rust in there to jam things up. Back to Buddha
Speaker 3: Judge and his DEI obsession instead. The Posts Exclusive notes
Speaker 3: that the DOT approved around four hundred DEI related grants
Speaker 3: between twenty twenty one and twenty twenty four, who were
Speaker 3: totaling over eighty billion dollars billion with a b more
Speaker 3: than half of the agency's typical annual budget. By comparison,
Speaker 3: the previous administration approved just sixty such grants for only
Speaker 3: a few billion. Oh well, you know, that's how you
Speaker 3: know Trump is on our side. He's only doing a
Speaker 3: little bit of DEI here and there. He's not giving
Speaker 3: them eighty billion dollars, just a few billion dollars for DEI.
Speaker 4: Yeah, just a few billion, but a great win, just a.
Speaker 3: Small number of billions. Critics argue this redirection of priorities
Speaker 3: came at a cost. In January twenty twenty three, a
Speaker 3: major FAA system failure caused the first nationwide flight grounding
Speaker 3: since nine to eleven. Meanwhile, air traffic controller staffing has
Speaker 3: remained dangerously low. The twenty twenty four Industry letter when
Speaker 3: it get take it up to ninety years to meet
Speaker 3: staffing needs at key control centers at the current pace,
Speaker 3: ninety years, Well, you know, I'm not going to be
Speaker 3: here to see if that problem is fixed at that time.
Speaker 1: But I don't think it would be anytime.
Speaker 4: You've got a solution that takes ninety years to implement,
Speaker 4: You don't have a solution. Yeah, it's hopefully the next
Speaker 4: generations will figure this out.
Speaker 1: Well, you kids can work on it.
Speaker 3: Dot spokesperson Chris and Mager Jeger Major Whatever defended Butter
Speaker 3: Judge's record, calling it absurd to claim he neglected modernization. No,
Speaker 3: he was modernizing things in a different way. He was
Speaker 3: modernizing it in terms of who worked there, more modern Americans,
Speaker 3: you know, the hyper sexual gay guy.
Speaker 4: He was modernizing it he was going to bring it
Speaker 4: up to twenty twenty standards by no later than twenty
Speaker 4: one ten.
Speaker 3: He was modernizing it by making sure that the people
Speaker 3: who worked there didn't necessarily have to be qualified in
Speaker 3: terms of skill, just in terms of their characteristics. Oh
Speaker 3: you're a gay guy, cool, coming on your trans, wonderful,
Speaker 3: black Latino, lesbian, awesome, open the door. Do you know
Speaker 3: how to run these systems?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 8: No?
Speaker 3: Oh well, and of course if you have these cutouts
Speaker 3: for specific groups, you're taking it away from you know,
Speaker 3: someone who isn't in that group that may be qualified
Speaker 3: for the job and may do the job while you're
Speaker 3: waiting for this magical you know, homosexual or whatever that
Speaker 3: is interested in air traffic control to show up. It's
Speaker 3: we live in such a ridiculous time. B. L. Houghton,
Speaker 3: thank you so much for the tip. We really do
Speaker 3: appreciate it. We cannot thank you enough. Happy Monday Nights cheers, Yes,
Speaker 3: Happy Monday. Indeed it is the AC is busted in
Speaker 3: the studio. It is getting very very warm in here.
Speaker 3: I am starting to sweat. Dot spokesperson Chris Major defended
Speaker 3: Bodage's record, calling it absurd to claim he'd neglected modernization.
Speaker 3: He cited increased hiring, improved flight routes, upgraded runway software,
Speaker 3: and five billion in infrastructure funds for towers and power systems.
Speaker 3: They continually will say we did this, we did that,
Speaker 3: But every time you actually check on anything, it's getting worse.
Speaker 3: They'll point to these things. Look, we allocated this money
Speaker 3: over here, we put in these policies over there, and
Speaker 3: then what actually happens is quality goes down.
Speaker 4: And I have to wonder how much of this is
Speaker 4: just busy work and routine maintenance that they're dressing up
Speaker 4: to make it look like they really did something.
Speaker 3: Yeah, don't believe, you're lying. Eyes, don't believe the continual
Speaker 3: collapse of quality. Just look, we put in these policies.
Speaker 3: Isn't it wonderful? You also blame Congressional Republicans are blocking
Speaker 3: Biden's FY TWI request for initial eight building billion. I
Speaker 3: wonder what that FY stands for?
Speaker 6: Huh?
Speaker 3: I could think of an acronym. Secretary's Buddha Judge focus
Speaker 3: was always on safety, not just in aviation, but also
Speaker 3: on roads and bridges.
Speaker 1: Makers said, well, isn't that wonderful? Pothole?
Speaker 3: Pete the man known for neglecting infrastructure. Is in charge
Speaker 3: of our infrastructure. But industry officials counter that the FAA
Speaker 3: has operated with only eighty percent of its needed air
Speaker 3: traffic controller since at least twenty seventeen. Retirements and high
Speaker 3: dropout rates persist, contributing to cascading delays. One one officials said,
Speaker 3: that's right, only eighty percent. No wonder there's continual delays
Speaker 3: at the airport. They don't have the staff to actually
Speaker 3: track the planes. Jay Leno rips late night hosts for
Speaker 3: alienating half the cun tree. And they're not funny either.
Speaker 3: They are simply propaganda mouthpieces and they can't even be
Speaker 3: bothered to be funny while doing it. I don't know
Speaker 3: if this s has more about their audience or them.
Speaker 3: They are only there to push whatever the party line is,
Speaker 3: and they'll.
Speaker 4: Funny when you think about it, because it's true. They've
Speaker 4: taken what was, you know, an American staple, the late
Speaker 4: night show, and turned it into a super partisan, biased,
Speaker 4: garbage rag propaganda piece.
Speaker 1: And the funny thing is.
Speaker 3: The so many people in my generation have gone so
Speaker 3: far left that these people they see anyone who's not
Speaker 3: a borderline communist as being a fascist.
Speaker 1: It's just continual.
Speaker 3: Was it Herbert Marcuse who speculated and postulated that anyone
Speaker 3: that is not continually moving further left is in danger
Speaker 3: of becoming a fascist on the right, I believe it
Speaker 3: was Herbert Marcuse. I cannot remember exactly, but they all
Speaker 3: ascribed to this sort of ideology where if you're not
Speaker 3: a socialist at minimum and trying to become a communist Marxist,
Speaker 3: then you are in danger of falling towards the right,
Speaker 3: of falling into fascism. Accidentally, leave politics to the politicians
Speaker 3: and just get on with being entertaining. That's the advice
Speaker 3: iconic late night talk show host Jay Leno gave when
Speaker 3: he joined David Trulio, the president and CEO of the
Speaker 3: Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation, to dissect his approach to political humor.
Speaker 3: Seventy five year old reflected on his time as a
Speaker 3: successful host of The Tonight Show. So, in going after
Speaker 3: Republicans and taking aim at Democrats, did you have a strategy?
Speaker 3: Trulio ass It was fun to me when I got
Speaker 3: hate letters like dear mister Leno, you and your Republican friends,
Speaker 3: and well, mister Lenno, I hope you and your Democratic
Speaker 3: buddies are happy over the same joke. Leno recalled, that's
Speaker 3: how you know you made a good joke. You've offended everyone,
Speaker 3: not just a specific portion I suppose, and I go, well,
Speaker 3: that's good. He said, That's how you get a whole audience.
Speaker 3: Leno went on to note how late night comedy has
Speaker 3: changed amid the current divisive political landscape. Now you have
Speaker 3: to be content with half the audience because you have
Speaker 3: to give your opinion.
Speaker 1: Leno said.
Speaker 3: When Trulio asked if Leno had any advice for comedians today,
Speaker 3: the Jay Leno's Garage host referred to a longtime friendship
Speaker 3: with late comedy legend Rodney Dangerfield said, I knew Rodney
Speaker 3: for forty years. Said I have no idea if he
Speaker 3: was Democrat or Republican. We never discussed it. We just
Speaker 3: discussed jokes. Talking about this, my dad said, take my
Speaker 3: political party please, And to me, I like to think
Speaker 3: that people come to a comedy show to kind of
Speaker 3: get away from the things, you know, the pressures of life,
Speaker 3: whatever it might be. And know continued, and I love
Speaker 3: political humor, don't get me wrong, but it's just what
Speaker 3: happens when people wind up, cozying, casing up too much
Speaker 3: to one side or the other.
Speaker 1: The uh.
Speaker 3: I don't watch much comedy. I will occasionally. I find
Speaker 3: a stand up comedy to be a less entertaining form
Speaker 3: of comedy. But so many modern leftist comedians. They don't
Speaker 3: tell jokes, they have lectures. They're not trying to get
Speaker 3: a laugh out of you. They're trying to get the
Speaker 3: audience to applaud them for their political opinions. They're not
Speaker 3: trying to get them to chuckle. They're trying to make
Speaker 3: them go, oh, yes, that was a wonderful point. Oh yes,
Speaker 3: we're on the right side of history. Because to be
Speaker 3: funny usually comes with some slight offense to people, and
Speaker 3: the left you're not allowed to offend anyone except, of course,
Speaker 3: white people, generally only white men at that. As Texas
Speaker 3: becomes the seventh state to ban lab grown meat, Trump's
Speaker 3: FDA and USDA advance it. Yeah, they're also the USDA
Speaker 3: is also pushing mRNA for meat.
Speaker 1: Isn't that wonderful.
Speaker 3: The mRNA vaccine for food. Texas will become the seventh
Speaker 3: state to ban the production and sale of lab grown meat.
Speaker 3: In September, Florida was the first, followed by Alabama last year.
Speaker 3: This year, five more states, including Texas, followed.
Speaker 1: They did so after.
Speaker 3: The Trump administration took the opposite approach in twenty nineteen.
Speaker 3: The first Trump administration was the first in US history
Speaker 3: to begin the process to authorize lab grown chicken, seafood,
Speaker 3: and beef. Another wonderful gift from President Trump, lab grown
Speaker 3: meat tumor steaks.
Speaker 4: No one else could have gotten this steak through. It's
Speaker 4: a big, beautiful steak. You can love stak.
Speaker 3: Love you lab grown steak. It's just the same as
Speaker 3: a regular steak. Sure it looks like a tumor, it
Speaker 3: tastes like one two, but you gotta love it. This
Speaker 3: from Zero Hedge. Eleven stabbed in attack at Michigan Walmart.
Speaker 3: Of course, Walmart doesn't want people to have guns for
Speaker 3: self defense. They don't like selling them. At least eleven
Speaker 3: people injured. Meanwhile, TJ. Muscaro reports for The Epoch Times
Speaker 3: that months in Healthcare posted on social media that eleven
Speaker 3: people were being treated at a hospital in northern Michigan,
Speaker 3: and a spokes when further said that all eleven were
Speaker 3: stabbing victims. Spokesperson Megan Brown said late Saturday, that six
Speaker 3: were in critical condition, five were in serious condition.
Speaker 4: Was it a tactical assault knife.
Speaker 3: A lot of people don't realize how dangerous stabbings are.
Speaker 3: A stab wound can be very very lethal.
Speaker 4: People to go after the manufacturers of that knife exactly.
Speaker 3: Was it a high capacity knife? But a stab wound
Speaker 3: is not just a you know, oh well you're not shot.
Speaker 3: So no, For a large portion of human history, stab
Speaker 3: wounds were the main method of killing people. It was
Speaker 3: the go to weapon of choice. Was something you stabbed
Speaker 3: the other guy with Knives are remarkably efficient at killing people.
Speaker 3: The Grand Traverse County, the Grand Traverse County Sheriff's office
Speaker 3: later said in a statement on social media the suspect
Speaker 3: was a forty two year old man who entered the store.
Speaker 3: The it's just people are getting crazier. The number of
Speaker 3: you know, mentally ill people seems to be rising. The
Speaker 3: number of people that are violent and commit violent crimes
Speaker 3: seems to be rising. This is just my observations of things.
Speaker 3: I don't have any data to back that up, but
Speaker 3: sure seems that way. Citizen of americaka mm mmmm steak mitosis.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 3: It won't be wonderful You'll buy one steak, you leave
Speaker 3: it in your fridge and it splits into another steak,
Speaker 3: and then another steak. You just buy one steak and
Speaker 3: you're set for life.
Speaker 4: What you're saying about things getting worse, There weren't mass
Speaker 4: shootings a few decades ago when guns were a lot
Speaker 4: more common and they had, you know, shooting competitions and schools. Yeah,
Speaker 4: it is clearly the culture straying farther from gone.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Forty percent of all violent crimes suspects in German schools
Speaker 3: are foreigners, over two knife attacks per day. The wonders
Speaker 3: of multiculturalism and importing from countries that have violent cultures.
Speaker 3: New data shows that forty percent of all suspects identified
Speaker 3: in school violence in twenty twenty four were not German citizens,
Speaker 3: with Syrians at the top of the charts. In total,
Speaker 3: there were and fifty four to foreign suspects and seven
Speaker 3: three hundred and nine suspects with German citizenship. German government announced,
Speaker 3: in response to a preliminary inquiry from Alternative for Germany
Speaker 3: AfD MP Martin Hesse, the eleven thousand, five and fifty
Speaker 3: eight suspects in Totaldred thirty six had Syrian passports, representing
Speaker 3: one in ten violent incidents according to the data which
Speaker 3: was provided to Welt newspaper, and second place for Afghans,
Speaker 3: who represented three point six percent of all suspects. Which
Speaker 3: should be noted is that an extremely large number of
Speaker 3: German suspects or individuals with a foreign background, but since
Speaker 3: they have German passports, they are counted solely as Germans.
Speaker 3: Even with those with dual citizenship, they are only counted
Speaker 3: as Germans. So they're inflating the numbers of Germans committing
Speaker 3: these attacks while decreasing the numbers for.
Speaker 1: The other side.
Speaker 3: Oh no, sure, he's from someplace else, but he's got
Speaker 3: a German passport, so that makes him German.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's right.
Speaker 3: All you have to do to be a German is
Speaker 3: get a German passport. It's not about a culture or
Speaker 3: a heritage. It's simply this document the government issues and
Speaker 3: suddenly you're German. You immediately become German. This is the
Speaker 3: folly of multiculturalism. Once you flood a country with people
Speaker 3: that don't share their values, or their culture or their history,
Speaker 3: it's not the same. It's not the same country anymore.
Speaker 3: You cannot transplant an infinite number of people and maintain
Speaker 3: cultural cohesion. If we were to swap the populations of
Speaker 3: Japan and Mexico geographically, they wouldn't still be the same.
Speaker 3: Mexico wouldn't continue on as it had been. It would
Speaker 3: effectively be Japan, and Japan would effectively be Mexico. And
Speaker 3: they'd go about rectifying the architectural differences and such. And
Speaker 3: if you do it slowly, over time the process happens,
Speaker 3: just not as quickly. Tennel Lord went three three seven.
Speaker 3: Just a cancer blob that is in the shape of
Speaker 3: a steak. Yeah, it's gonna be wonderful.
Speaker 1: Mama c.
Speaker 3: Nineteen ninety six, My friend's grandmother was one of the victims.
Speaker 3: She is doing okay, Praise God. That's I'm sorry to
Speaker 3: hear she was one of the victims, but I'm so
Speaker 3: glad to hear that she's doing okay.
Speaker 1: Praise God.
Speaker 3: So please everyone in the audience keep Mamasee's friend's.
Speaker 1: Grandmother in your prayers.
Speaker 3: We'll have to make sure that we pray for her
Speaker 3: and that she continues to heal properly. Very sorry that
Speaker 3: that happened to her, but again, wonderful to hear she's
Speaker 3: doing all right. In total, there were thirty five, five
Speaker 3: hundred and seventy violent crimes in Germany school system last year.
Speaker 3: That amounts to ninety seven violent crimes per day. One
Speaker 3: of those crimes. Of those crimes, seven hundred and forty
Speaker 3: were knife attacks, that is over two knife attacks per day. Well,
Speaker 3: you know those Germans famous for their knife fights. I
Speaker 3: remember growing up, and you know, my father would always
Speaker 3: tell me, don't challenge a German to a knife fight, son.
Speaker 3: That's what they're good at. That's what they do in
Speaker 3: their spare time. They're in school and they're knife fighting
Speaker 3: each other constantly. It's a really big problem for the Germans. However,
Speaker 3: when all crimes are taken into account, they total ninety
Speaker 3: four three hundred and eighteen. On top of that, twenty
Speaker 3: four two hundred and ninety two crimes took place at
Speaker 3: school events, such as at a school field trip or
Speaker 3: a theatrical production, which also included an additional two one
Speaker 3: hundred and eighty four incidents involving a knife. Niburu twenty
Speaker 3: twenty nine. Mostly peaceful migrants, Yes, that's right, they're mostly peaceful.
Speaker 3: They don't have to worry about them. Sure, they're far
Speaker 3: more violent, commit violent crimes at a much higher rate.
Speaker 3: Even when we try to obfuscate who's doing it and
Speaker 3: give them citizenship and claim that they're under German, that
Speaker 3: they are Germans, and put them under the total of Germans,
Speaker 3: it still ends up being a terrible look per capita.
Speaker 4: And these people, you know, they're coming from these areas
Speaker 4: that they claim to be refugees, because the areas have
Speaker 4: a lot of crime, and the crime is you know,
Speaker 4: being committed by the young men, and it's mostly the
Speaker 4: young men that are coming over here. It's not the refugees,
Speaker 4: it's the problem that's coming.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: People don't check their culture or their beliefs at the
Speaker 3: door when they enter your country. They bring them with them.
Speaker 3: They are not going to give up on who they
Speaker 3: are as people. Even when someone comes here or comes
Speaker 3: to any country and they want to be a part
Speaker 3: of that country and they want to embrace the culture,
Speaker 3: they are still going to have differences. They're still going
Speaker 3: to have their own culture which they want to adhere to.
Speaker 3: Somewhat is a general rule, and as such, even with
Speaker 3: legal immigration of that sort, you need to make sure
Speaker 3: it's at a pace that doesn't undermine the existing culture.
Speaker 3: It's a very tricky subject. And of course I personally
Speaker 3: believe that you know, the people of the country, and
Speaker 3: you know, the individual states within the United States have
Speaker 3: the right to decide who gets to enter. If say,
Speaker 3: Tennessee wanted to make a law barring anyone from you know, Germany,
Speaker 3: let's say, or Switzerland, or Mexico or Canada or heck,
Speaker 3: even any of the other states, I think they should
Speaker 3: be free to do that and say no, you want
Speaker 3: to move here from California. I don't think so, we
Speaker 3: don't want you go away, And personally I'd be in
Speaker 3: favor of that law. You do not have the right
Speaker 3: to a home in a specific area. Watch viral video
Speaker 3: of home depot Karen's harassing Ice agents making arrests. Of course,
Speaker 3: you can see the ICE agent there in that photo
Speaker 3: in the article.
Speaker 1: He's wearing a mask.
Speaker 3: He is got his face fully covered, he's wearing a
Speaker 3: ball cap and looks like sunglasses. There is nothing to
Speaker 3: distinguish him at all. These are fully masked thugs. And
Speaker 3: let's try to steal man why they're doing this. Let's
Speaker 3: try to look at it and say what would cause
Speaker 3: them to do this? In Mexico, when certain tasks force
Speaker 3: are going after the cartels, they wear masks for fear
Speaker 3: of reprisal. They wear masks because the cartels have so
Speaker 3: much power that they're able to get info if their
Speaker 3: faces are seen.
Speaker 1: I don't know how effective it is.
Speaker 3: I imagine their identities are still listed in databases somewhere,
Speaker 3: so I don't know if the masks are truly effective.
Speaker 3: But that's the reason given they're worried that the cartels
Speaker 3: will kill their families.
Speaker 4: And with this it also must be that the left
Speaker 4: will also go after you personally and docks you if
Speaker 4: they get your information.
Speaker 3: Yes, but that we still do not enjoy the precedent,
Speaker 3: or support the precedent of having these fully masked unknowns
Speaker 3: with the full authority to drag you out into the street. Yeah,
Speaker 3: it's under pretense.
Speaker 4: There's no good solution on either side.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and again, they allowed the migration crisis to happen,
Speaker 3: they fostered it. But that doesn't mean the solutions they're
Speaker 3: giving you are the good ones.
Speaker 4: Because whether or not you think this is called for
Speaker 4: with the level of the crisis, there are a lot
Speaker 4: of much less authoritarian things that would have a greater effect,
Speaker 4: like getting rid of all the benefits for illegals.
Speaker 1: Yeah, if you get rid of the welfare state, it will.
Speaker 3: Will stop pulling people in. I would be curious. I'm
Speaker 3: personally of the opinion that even if you get rid
Speaker 3: of the welfare state, I'm not sure many of them
Speaker 3: will leave, since being poor here in America may very
Speaker 3: well be being poor in the countries they came from.
Speaker 4: It won't fix the problem one, but this is the problem.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm just saying, it's like everyone.
Speaker 3: I'm not one of those people that's like, oh, you
Speaker 3: just get rid of the welfare state and problem solves,
Speaker 3: Like it's it's the first step you need to take.
Speaker 3: But it's not the It's not going to cause a
Speaker 3: mass de migration. I don't think you have to start
Speaker 3: penalizing people and making their lives more difficult somehow if
Speaker 3: they came here illegally, and I do think deportations are necessary.
Speaker 4: But that's the fact that they went straight for the
Speaker 4: authoritarian stuff. Well, not touching any of the logical stuff
Speaker 4: really shows that this is another mcguffin. Yeah, it's a
Speaker 4: real problem, but it's also mcguffin.
Speaker 3: Posted the video to the account at life by Danny
Speaker 3: closed caption the video and posted commentary. The video shows
Speaker 3: her joined by two other women and confronting the agents,
Speaker 3: swearing at them, demanding to see a warrant, accusing them
Speaker 3: of kidnapping, berating them for wearing masks, and insulting them
Speaker 3: for being ICE agents. One woman kept trying to get
Speaker 3: a phone number from one of these suspected illegal aliens
Speaker 3: if she could contact his family, and was upset because
Speaker 3: the agents were too busy making an arrest to accommodate
Speaker 3: her demands. Now, uh, again, this is not the solution
Speaker 3: we want. But you also have to understand the psychology
Speaker 3: of the people that are berating these They're not over
Speaker 3: there thinking about civil liberties. They're not over there thinking about, oh,
Speaker 3: this is a dangerous precedent, YadA, YadA. This is simply
Speaker 3: about white people being racist to them. I guarantee it.
Speaker 3: I guarantee these women are simply over there thinking like, oh, well,
Speaker 3: America's built on stolen and this, that and the other.
Speaker 3: If they're thinking at all, they're simply coming at it
Speaker 3: from a Marxist you know, critical theory lens where oppression
Speaker 3: hierarchies exist, and as such, you can't really make common
Speaker 3: cause with these people. You can't get together with these
Speaker 3: people and say well we agree on the fact that
Speaker 3: they're doing.
Speaker 1: This and it needs to be stopped. They will stab
Speaker 1: you in the back immediately. They will immediately.
Speaker 3: Step over your corpse to get their agenda passed. Don't
Speaker 3: frag me, bro. The people being allowed in are coming
Speaker 3: from antithetical cultures and flow into middle class America for
Speaker 3: a reason.
Speaker 1: Just look at the UK. They're also primarily single.
Speaker 3: Males of military ASIAC because those are the ones that
Speaker 3: cause the most damage. Those are the ones that get
Speaker 3: upset when they can't find work, assuming they're looking for work,
Speaker 3: They're the ones that do the most harm. Denver Ataway.
Speaker 3: How about ending corpo tax soup holes and taxing companies
Speaker 3: that are large than most countries. There might be some
Speaker 3: dead weight loss resources to be repatriated from there, just
Speaker 3: saying yeah. I'm also for heavily penalizing companies that hire
Speaker 3: illegal aliens. If you can't afford to pay Americans to
Speaker 3: do the job, I'm sorry, maybe you don't get to
Speaker 3: do the job.
Speaker 4: Also, if you're not mentioned very often, but currently companies
Speaker 4: are essentially incentivized to hire illegal aliens because you have
Speaker 4: to pay taxes on employees, and a lot of people
Speaker 4: don't realize that. You know, their employer is paying taxes
Speaker 4: on all the wages they're paying them, But you don't
Speaker 4: have to pay that.
Speaker 3: With an illegal, yeah, you get to pay them less
Speaker 3: and then you don't have to pay the government. So
Speaker 3: you end up saving a lot of money by hiring illegals.
Speaker 3: No Secret Police bill in Pennsylvania aims to unmask ICE,
Speaker 3: joining state lawmakers from California, New York, Massachusetts, and Tennessee.
Speaker 1: The unmasked ICE.
Speaker 3: Effort is a reaction to officers concealing their identities to
Speaker 3: evade public attacks and retaliate for the agency's operation, which
Speaker 3: have led to widespread fear, anger and protests. And again,
Speaker 3: I think necessarily they do need to be unmasked, and
Speaker 3: I'm sure there will be difficulties with that. It'll probably
Speaker 3: lead to problems for them, but that is the job
Speaker 3: they signed up for. They are, you know, they are
Speaker 3: public servants and as such we should be able to
Speaker 3: know who they are. I know, I'm sure a lot
Speaker 3: of them are simply trying to do the right thing.
Speaker 3: I'm not one of those people that thinks you know
Speaker 3: every police officer is bad. I think the entire institution
Speaker 3: of it is bad, and if you are a part
Speaker 3: of it, that's a problem. But I don't necessarily think
Speaker 3: each individual one is some mustache twirling villain that is
Speaker 3: out to abuse their power. That doesn't give them a
Speaker 3: pass for being a part of the system, but it
Speaker 3: should change how you interact with them and try to
Speaker 3: change their mind on things.
Speaker 1: That's my opinion.
Speaker 4: We need good cops. Like you can't just say all
Speaker 4: cops are bad because obviously some of them aren't really
Speaker 4: trying and the system is systemically corrupt. But you know,
Speaker 4: people can still try and work and do good within that,
Speaker 4: especially at the level of sheriff.
Speaker 3: Yeah, sheriff is where you can make a lot of difference.
Speaker 3: All right, folks, we're going to take a quick break
Speaker 3: and we will be right back.
Speaker 1: Stay with us.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show. Penny Saved is
Speaker 2: a penny earned.
Speaker 3: I pressed the wrong button. Welcome back, folks. That coin
Speaker 3: is sold out with such a good deal people bought
Speaker 3: it immediately. I want to say thank you to the
Speaker 3: people who have sent in checks so far this month.
Speaker 3: Elissandra Are, Jim M. Kelly M, Terry T, Jackie and
Speaker 3: Fred You, Mary Ann, Ronald C. Paula and Brian M.
Speaker 3: Really cannot thank you enough for the support. It is
Speaker 3: what keeps us going right about sixty six percent so
Speaker 3: far this month.
Speaker 1: We really do appreciate it.
Speaker 3: If you would like to support the show, and we
Speaker 3: ask that you do support the show, you can go
Speaker 3: to Davidknight dot news and see all the ways you
Speaker 3: can do that there. The first one listed is the
Speaker 3: po box, which is David Knight po Box nine nine four,
Speaker 3: Kodak Tennessee three seven seven six four. If you'd like
Speaker 3: to send a check, that's where you can do it.
Speaker 3: There is zell cash app and a bit coin address
Speaker 3: you can go to subscribe start dot com forward slash
Speaker 3: the David Knight Show. You have a lot of different tiers.
Speaker 3: One of them may fit your budget as that you
Speaker 3: consider that as well. There is Davidknight dot gold that
Speaker 3: lets Tony Rderburn know you came through us. If you
Speaker 3: want to start getting outside of the FIAT monetary system
Speaker 3: and stacking gold or silver, you can go to Davidknight
Speaker 3: dot gold to do that. There's Trends Journal dot com
Speaker 3: where you get ten percent off with promo code night
Speaker 3: and works out to two fifty a week. There's rncstore
Speaker 3: dot com Promo code night for ten percent off there
Speaker 3: as well. Hopefully they can help you with your health concerns.
Speaker 3: Take a look at their products and of course, as
Speaker 3: they said, homestead products dot shop. They've got all kinds
Speaker 3: of different things, even things like gun lube, So if
Speaker 3: you have a sig that you want to keep running,
Speaker 3: you can go there and check out that and many
Speaker 3: many other kinds of products as well. Promo code night
Speaker 3: for ten percent off as well. A Syrian girl, I
Speaker 3: think pulling the plug on Welfare and Benny's will start
Speaker 3: a mass demigration. Maybe they will then target the EU.
Speaker 3: Wouldn't that be nice? But there will be some who
Speaker 3: remain still will be a net win for the US.
Speaker 3: I agree, it would be a net win. It's the
Speaker 3: first step that absolutely has to happen. It has to
Speaker 3: happen if you are serious about getting these people out
Speaker 3: of the country. If you don't do that, nothing you
Speaker 3: do is going to stop people from flooding the country.
Speaker 4: And the politicians that were shot, those two politicians by
Speaker 4: that crazy guy a while ago, they were shot because
Speaker 4: they supported ending a bill that would end some of
Speaker 4: the benefits to.
Speaker 3: Illegals citizen of AMERICAKA, yeah, good guys shouldn't wear masks,
Speaker 3: but cartels.
Speaker 1: What about the latest.
Speaker 3: Robbery that wasn't random hit on those ice agents, Travis.
Speaker 3: He didn't want their wallets, he wanted their lives. Again,
Speaker 3: I think it's a Again, it's a very nuanced problem.
Speaker 3: I do agree that the cartels are incredibly violent and dangerous,
Speaker 3: and I don't think there is a good solution where
Speaker 3: everyone is happy with this.
Speaker 4: It's not a great solution though. You are kind of
Speaker 4: put in the position of, you know, protecting the police
Speaker 4: that sign up to be between the threat and you
Speaker 4: and protecting the people when you have them wearing masks.
Speaker 4: That's kind of begging for a police state, which is
Speaker 4: a danger and of itself.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 4: But on the other hand, when things get too dangerous,
Speaker 4: there comes a point where you can't ask the police
Speaker 4: to do that. Yeah.
Speaker 3: So I understand where you're coming from, and I agree
Speaker 3: that these guys do deserve levels of protection. And I
Speaker 3: don't know what the solution that makes everyone happy is.
Speaker 3: The cartels are incredibly violent, and we are not afraid
Speaker 3: of targeting government employees and officials to get their way
Speaker 3: or to make a point KWD sixty eight. The militarization
Speaker 3: of the police was a great idea to keep us safe. Yeah,
Speaker 3: they've done a wonderful job keeping us safe so far.
Speaker 3: It's don't you all feel so safe and secure? This
Speaker 3: is from the mirror. US Trump takes no chances and
Speaker 3: armored golf buggy as protesters storm streets. That's right, he's
Speaker 3: got golf Force one.
Speaker 1: You can see it here.
Speaker 3: It's an armored little almost looks like a gator. What
Speaker 3: a ridiculous thing to have. Photographers have noticed a new
Speaker 3: security supports system for US President Donald Trump and armored
Speaker 3: golf cart so he can play around peacefully.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 3: I suppose this is more of an unhappy Gilmore scenario.
Speaker 3: President Donald Trump was presented with an armored golf cart
Speaker 3: for his visit to Scotland, where protesters are planning plenty
Speaker 3: of disruptions to express their feelings. Yes, we heard many
Speaker 3: of them were out there shouting get out of my swamp.
Speaker 3: During Trump's recent visit to the Trump Turnberry golf Course
Speaker 3: in South Ayrshire, Scotland security team introduced a black reinforced
Speaker 3: armored golf cart referred to as Golf Force one for
Speaker 3: the president's protection. The Boogie wasn't driven by Trump, but
Speaker 3: is thought to be his getaway vehicle should anyone open
Speaker 3: fire on the course. This sounds like something that would
Speaker 3: have been in some ridiculous action movie years ago.
Speaker 8: You know.
Speaker 1: What is that?
Speaker 6: Uh?
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 3: There's some ridiculous action movie where the White House gets attacked.
Speaker 3: It seems like something that would have been in that.
Speaker 3: But reality, that'd be a good title. The Bugey wasn't
Speaker 3: driven by Trump, but it's thought to be his getaway vehicle.
Speaker 3: The Beast is the armored US presidential state car. According
Speaker 3: to The Daily Mail, it is believed to be bulletproof
Speaker 3: and equipped with fancy security features, potentially including smoke screens
Speaker 3: and electrified door handles. The US Secret Service spokesman said
Speaker 3: to The Mail that the agency employees a variety of
Speaker 3: tools and resources to safeguard our protectees in order to
Speaker 3: maintain operational security. Secret Service does not discuss this specific
Speaker 3: means and methods used to conduct are protective operations. President
Speaker 3: Donald Trump played golf at his Turnbery course in Scotland
Speaker 3: on Saturday, accompanied by his son Eric and US Ambassador
Speaker 3: Warren Stevens. Security kept protesters at a distance as Trump
Speaker 3: enjoyed his round. Hundreds of demonstrators gathered in Edinburgh and
Speaker 3: other UK cities to protest his visit, criticize British leaders
Speaker 3: for cooperating with him, and voice opposition to US policies.
Speaker 3: The protests, organized by various groups, including environmentalists and pro
Speaker 3: Ukraine activists, formed a Stop Trump coalition described their actions
Speaker 3: as a carnival of resistance, a carnival of these people
Speaker 3: are unseerious, they cannot help, but inject this sort of ridiculous,
Speaker 3: stupid language into everything they do. It's a carnival of
Speaker 3: resists in Skys. We're gonna have so much fun. We're
Speaker 3: gonna be out there. We're gonna have face painting and balloons.
Speaker 1: There'll be clowns.
Speaker 3: There's always clowns at every leftist protests. Trump's late mother,
Speaker 3: Maryan McLoud, was born on the Isle of Lewis in Scotland,
Speaker 3: and the president has suggested he feels at home in
Speaker 3: the country. Protesters out and about wanted Trump, wanted to
Speaker 3: make Trump feel different. I don't think I could just
Speaker 3: stand by and do any and not do any things.
Speaker 3: At Amy White, fifteen Edinburgh, who attended with her parents,
Speaker 3: she held a cardboard sign that said, we don't negotiate
Speaker 3: with fascists. I cannot help but roll my eyes at
Speaker 3: these people.
Speaker 4: The thing is even there. They have a reason to
Speaker 4: be upset with Trump, with the warp speed vaccine that
Speaker 4: he pushed, but they aren't upset about that. They're upset
Speaker 4: because of America's immigration policies. Yeah, on American soil, which
Speaker 4: doesn't affect them.
Speaker 3: The level of gas lighting that white European countries have
Speaker 3: undergone for years about if you want to maintain social cohesion,
Speaker 3: if you want to keep your country for the people
Speaker 3: that built it, you're racist and fascist is truly mind boggling.
Speaker 3: These people are excited to turn it over to people
Speaker 3: that will destroy it.
Speaker 1: Who cares? You know, it doesn't matter. Now.
Speaker 3: You can become Scottish just by immigrating there. If the
Speaker 3: government hands you a piece of paper that says you're Scottish,
Speaker 3: you're Scottish.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 3: If I were to go to Scotland and become a citizen,
Speaker 3: that makes me Scottish, and I therefore can tell them
Speaker 3: what a true Scotsman is in fact, I might tell
Speaker 3: them that there is no such thing as a true Scotsman.
Speaker 4: I mean Trump just said he feels at home in Scotland,
Speaker 4: so who are they to say that he's not Scottish.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Angry Tiger's Dan says, maybe we did not fund
Speaker 3: the cartels who are not have to.
Speaker 1: Worry about it. That's a good first step.
Speaker 3: Perhaps if we got rid of the drug war and
Speaker 3: stopped allowing them this massive cash cow, they'd be less dangerous.
Speaker 3: Angry Tiger has a lot of good information, makes a
Speaker 3: lot of great points. Defy Tyrants seventeen seventy six. Better
Speaker 3: be careful what we wish for. We shouldn't be yearning
Speaker 3: for government to round up people using gestapo tactics. Yeah,
Speaker 3: that is the main point. What they do to others,
Speaker 3: they will do to you as a general rule. It's
Speaker 3: not that these people don't deserve to be rounded up
Speaker 3: and kicked out of the country. It's you have to
Speaker 3: be careful what you empower the federal government with. What
Speaker 3: you let them do can be very very dangerous. Defy
Speaker 3: Tyrants seventeen seventy six. Trump using taxpayer money to enrich
Speaker 3: himself through his private businesses. Gotta love America.
Speaker 4: That's right and true. You've got to ship you know,
Speaker 4: the armored golf cart there have, you know, the secret
Speaker 4: service over his private golf course, and a foreign country
Speaker 4: bringing you know, publicity to it.
Speaker 5: I'm sure that it was cheap.
Speaker 3: I'm sure it didn't cost the American people much, you know,
Speaker 3: probably just a few million here, a few million there,
Speaker 3: he said. So many people here loathe him. We're not divided.
Speaker 3: We're not divided by religion or race or political allegiance.
Speaker 3: We're just here together because we hate him. Well, at
Speaker 3: least Trump is unifying people somehow.
Speaker 1: I guess we.
Speaker 4: Don't have any particular reason, but we've been told to
Speaker 4: hate him.
Speaker 3: So therefore, and again, this is one of the most
Speaker 3: difficult things, because Donald Trump is a terrible president. He's wicked.
Speaker 3: He poisoned millions of people. He empowered the government with
Speaker 3: so many you know, he allowed them to do things
Speaker 3: that they had never been able to get through before.
Speaker 3: He was a blight on us, and he's still a
Speaker 3: blight on us. And yet the reason they hate him
Speaker 3: is so ridiculous and nonsensical and over the top. It
Speaker 3: gives him cover for everything he wants to do maga.
Speaker 3: I'm convinced at this point doesn't necessarily like Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: But the people who hate him on the left are
Speaker 3: so comically cartoonishly, buffoonishly evil and incompetent that they just
Speaker 3: enjoy seeing them upset. People like Stephen Colbert and his
Speaker 3: ridiculous you know, oh well, f you, his unfunny railing
Speaker 3: against Trump gives him cover because you look at someone
Speaker 3: like Colbert and you say, I despise this man. He
Speaker 3: is everything that is wrong with this country. And if
Speaker 3: Colbert hates Trump, that must mean Trump is a good guy.
Speaker 3: You look at these dyed haired Marxists on these college
Speaker 3: campuses and you go, they hate Trump, and therefore the
Speaker 3: enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Speaker 1: But that's not true.
Speaker 3: We are caught between a rock and a hard place.
Speaker 3: We've got Donald Trump on one side and these Frankfurt
Speaker 3: school Marxists on the other, and we continually fall for
Speaker 3: the oh well, you gotta pick one of them, you
Speaker 3: gotta pick the lesser of two evils. Nonsense, You're still
Speaker 3: picking evil when you do that. Don't do it, Nights
Speaker 3: of the Storm. The first step in cutting welfare should
Speaker 3: be to take Israel and Ukraine's snap cards. That's right,
Speaker 3: no more EBT for Israel and Ukraine. You're not gonna
Speaker 3: walk into the You're not gonna walk into raytheon and
Speaker 3: say I would like some missiles on credit, please Denver
Speaker 3: adaway armor golf buggy. It's nice to know golf is
Speaker 3: such a priority in these days of unprecedented change.
Speaker 1: Am I right?
Speaker 8: Yeah?
Speaker 3: You know, sometimes you just gotta relax. You gotta be
Speaker 3: able to get out there on the course and play
Speaker 3: a few rounds. Gotta get your armored golf buggy out
Speaker 3: there at the expense of the American people. Bill Hulton,
Speaker 3: the Gulf of America. That's right, Mibrew twenty twenty nine.
Speaker 3: Foreign drug cartels are fully backed by US banking cartel
Speaker 3: laundering their money.
Speaker 1: Yeah, what was it?
Speaker 3: I forget which bank it was, but that the Cineloa
Speaker 3: cartel had their own private window. They knew it was
Speaker 3: laundering money for the cartel. They didn't do anything to stop.
Speaker 3: They're like, yes, here's your private window. You're one of
Speaker 3: our biggest depositors, so here you go. Which bank was it?
Speaker 3: I can't remember. I have a terrible memory for things
Speaker 3: like that.
Speaker 4: I think I know, but I don't want to say
Speaker 4: because I'm not one certain fair enough, you don't want
Speaker 4: to get that wrong.
Speaker 3: If the people in chat remember, feel free to post
Speaker 3: it so that way I can remember as well. Mibrew
Speaker 3: twenty twenty nine Marx America's first billion dollar golf cart.
Speaker 3: That's right, coming soon to a golf course near you,
Speaker 3: the armored golf cart. The deployment of golf Force one
Speaker 3: comes after a loan protester dared to face the heavy
Speaker 3: police presence at Donald Trump's golf course to demonstrate against
Speaker 3: the US President's visit to Scotland. Matt Halliday crashed the
Speaker 3: President's round of golf at his urn Bury golf course
Speaker 3: on Saturday. It was reported that Holliday showed up at
Speaker 3: the resort bearing two signs. One displayed a picture of
Speaker 3: Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. Another of a set of bagpipes.
Speaker 3: Message read Trump go home. The only blowhard pumped up
Speaker 3: wind bag that we want to listen to.
Speaker 1: Are these bad boy That's pretty good. That's pretty good.
Speaker 3: And you know he's got the picture of Trump and Epstein,
Speaker 3: so he's right on the money there. So this guy
Speaker 3: is reason for disliking Trump. I'm fully on board with
Speaker 3: He understands that this guy is a disgusting sexual deviant
Speaker 3: that had associations with Jeffrey Epstein. He's not simply there
Speaker 3: going Trump is racist. Trump bad because racist. He's got
Speaker 3: legitimate reasons. One of the worst things I've seen is
Speaker 3: that so many on the left are now pointing out
Speaker 3: that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump were close friends, and
Speaker 3: people on the right are refusing to admit it. They're
Speaker 3: refusing to accept that reality. It's like that old Onion
Speaker 3: article tragic the worst person you know makes a good point.
Speaker 3: These people, despite the fact that for years they have
Speaker 3: had nothing really to point at, they're now correct, and
Speaker 3: Maggot refuses to see it.
Speaker 1: They refuse to actually actually admit it.
Speaker 3: They're so tied at the hip to Donald Trump they
Speaker 3: cannot bring themselves to admit that they were hoodwinked candidate,
Speaker 3: bring themselves to admit the obvious. KWD sixty eight. Why
Speaker 3: isn't that golf cart gold? Trump is slipping? Yeah, you'd
Speaker 3: think he would have at least gotten them to do
Speaker 3: a gold vinyl rap on it. Maybe that's coming. Maybe
Speaker 3: he will have that happen soon. Can't have him out
Speaker 3: there rolling around in something that isn't gold. That's shameful.
Speaker 3: KWD sixty eight. Trump's golf. Trump Golf's a lot more
Speaker 3: now since Epstein Island is gone. Yeah, he doesn't have
Speaker 3: those other diversions. Well, I know we just took one,
Speaker 3: but I need to find the next article. We're done
Speaker 3: with this segment here, Angry Tiger's Dan Trump's armor Cheetoh
Speaker 3: wagon cost the taxpayers five hundred thousand dollars a five
Speaker 3: hundred thousand dollars golf cart.
Speaker 1: Isn't that wonderful.
Speaker 3: I'm most of us can't even afford to play golf.
Speaker 3: I don't think I could. I not that I necessarily
Speaker 3: want to either.
Speaker 4: But the funny thing is that's absolutely nothing by the
Speaker 4: standards of the government's waste.
Speaker 3: Yes, five hundred thousand dollars is a steal when it
Speaker 3: comes to government waste.
Speaker 1: Oh my goodness, you're.
Speaker 3: Only wasting five hundred thousand, only half a million. If
Speaker 3: that was the limit, we would be in good standing.
Speaker 3: You know, now, what is it round like thirty two
Speaker 3: trillion dollars in debt or something like that close to
Speaker 3: it thereabouts. That's a number that you physically cannot comprehend.
Speaker 3: It's a number that even if you were to round
Speaker 3: up all the billionaires on the planet and seize their assets,
Speaker 3: I don't think you would be able to scratch. It's
Speaker 3: an unimaginable, unfathomable number. Right to the storm, when Trump
Speaker 3: gets out of his armored cart, is he gonna take
Speaker 3: his shot in a neod suit? Now that would be entertaining,
Speaker 3: just completely and utterly covered from head to toe for
Speaker 3: his own personal protection. All right, As I said, we're
Speaker 3: gonna take a quick break. When we come back, we're
Speaker 3: gonna look at more data breaches McDonald's this time.
Speaker 5: Stay with us, liberty, it's your move.
Speaker 2: And now the David Night Show. You're listening to the
Speaker 2: David Night Show. What you're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: Welcome back, folks. As I said, we're gonna look at
Speaker 3: what happened with McDonald's night. So the Storm says, I
Speaker 3: think a lot of maga are fed up but scared
Speaker 3: to talk about it. They built their own cult. If
Speaker 3: you open the conversational door, you can get some to
Speaker 3: break out. Others will try to burn you. Yeah, I
Speaker 3: have seen some people online having buyers remorse with Trump
Speaker 3: to five tire at seventy to seventy six says. The
Speaker 3: thing is it doesn't matter since Trump doesn't need his
Speaker 3: moron supporters any longer. Yeah, that's kind of the point
Speaker 3: I was about to make, is just it's too late.
Speaker 3: Trump has already got his second term and there's not
Speaker 3: really anything anyone can do. He's in there, and they've
Speaker 3: already tried to impeach him and failed. He's kind of inoculated.
Speaker 3: If they were to try again, it would immediately rally
Speaker 3: support again.
Speaker 4: He's already publicly insulting people asking for the Epstein list.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he doesn't have to worry about getting elected again.
Speaker 1: His agenda.
Speaker 3: He's going to pass what he wants when he wants it,
Speaker 3: and if you try to push back on him, he'll
Speaker 3: come after you. KWD sixty eight tariff money paid for
Speaker 3: that golf cart. It's okay, that's right. It's all the
Speaker 3: tariff money, all that money that we're saving McDonald's mc
Speaker 3: McDonald's mchire AI bought excuse me, McDonald's AI bought just
Speaker 3: exposed the personal data of sixty four mcmillion people.
Speaker 1: This is from zero hedge.
Speaker 3: The security labs at McDonald's job application system could have
Speaker 3: exposed the personal details of around sixty four million people,
Speaker 3: all because someone used the password one two three four
Speaker 3: five six. According to Tom's hardware, that's amazing. We've got
Speaker 3: the same combination on our luggage. No data that you
Speaker 3: store online is safe, but you can make it a
Speaker 3: little bit safer by using a hard to guess password.
Speaker 3: One two three four five six is like the classic
Speaker 3: example of a password.
Speaker 1: You do not use.
Speaker 4: Yeah, this is yet another reason why we don't want
Speaker 4: that online safety ID verification nonsense.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Researchers Ian Carroll and Sam Curry discovered serious flaws.
Speaker 1: In mick Hire.
Speaker 3: The fact they called it mchire is just killing me.
Speaker 3: It's like they're building their own I don't know, world,
Speaker 3: their own lore. Yes, the McDonald's universe franchise. I can't
Speaker 3: wait for it to hit theaters.
Speaker 4: I want to get my McJob. It's so dystopian. Yeah,
Speaker 4: I get it rejected by mc hire. I got my
Speaker 4: MC rejection.
Speaker 3: Now I'm mcdestitute. It's the classics, sort of like when
Speaker 3: they would make fun of you know, these full on
Speaker 3: you know, like uh, what they call lolbers like libertarians
Speaker 3: that take it to the nth degree. They say, like, yes,
Speaker 3: that's right. You want the corporations, You want McDonald's to
Speaker 3: have their own mc mercenary force to daunt you down
Speaker 3: if you infringe on something of theirs. Researchers Ian Carroll
Speaker 3: and Sam Curry discovered serious flaws in mc hire, the
Speaker 3: chat bot developed by Paradox dot ai and used by
Speaker 3: most McDonald's franchises for recruitment. While poking around, they found
Speaker 3: the internal accounts used by Paradox staff were protected by
Speaker 3: one of the most commonly guest passwords in the world one, two, three, four,
Speaker 3: five six. You would think there's some kind of memo
Speaker 3: that they would send out to their staff saying, if
Speaker 3: you have administrator access of some sort, your password must
Speaker 3: contain you know, this, many characters, this many different variations
Speaker 3: of characters. Something you would think it would not allow you,
Speaker 3: like there should be a list of banned passwords that
Speaker 3: if you try to input, it just says, no, you
Speaker 3: can't do that.
Speaker 4: Why to try and sign up for some absurd, useless
Speaker 4: internet service that I need for one minor thing and
Speaker 4: I will never use again. They forced me to use
Speaker 4: a password that is more secure like ten characters long,
Speaker 4: and has a special character and a number in a
Speaker 4: capital letter, and all of that, and yet the one
Speaker 4: time where that is a reasonable thing to ask of
Speaker 4: people one two three four, five.
Speaker 1: Six, The report says.
Speaker 3: Carol compared it to his own teenage mistakes of using
Speaker 3: one two three four on a form account. That's slightly
Speaker 3: better than the password I used, I guess, he wrote,
Speaker 3: but not enough to justify its use decades after most
Speaker 3: people realize that using weak words is a bad idea.
Speaker 3: Using that flimsy credential, researchers gained administrative access, though initially
Speaker 3: only to test a restaurant account tied to Paradox employees
Speaker 3: that let them explore the system but didn't prove any
Speaker 3: real world risk. The real issue came when they found
Speaker 3: a second vulnerability, an insecure direct object reference idor flaw
Speaker 3: in the mchire API. Every time they say mckhire, I
Speaker 3: lose it just a little bit more. The bug let
Speaker 3: them pull sensitive data from any chat based application submitted
Speaker 3: to McDonald's names, email addresses, phone numbers, home addresses, application details,
Speaker 3: and even more log in tokens that allowed full access
Speaker 3: to user chats and potentially more. Paradox once posted that
Speaker 3: ninety percent of McDonald's franchises relied on mckire for hiring,
Speaker 3: though that claim has since quietly vanished from its blog.
Speaker 3: To put things in contacts, Paradox raised two hundred million
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty. McDonald's is worth over two one hundred billion,
Speaker 3: Yet a system handling tens of millions of people's private
Speaker 3: information was essentially protected by the digital equivalent of a
Speaker 3: sticky note on a monitor to a two hundred million
Speaker 3: dollar company working for a two hundred billion dollar company,
Speaker 3: and the password that one of their employees uses is
Speaker 3: one two three four five, And.
Speaker 4: The UK ID thing would require tons of companies. Anything
Speaker 4: that's remotely connected to uh, you know, adult contents, including
Speaker 4: stuff like violence and stop smoking support groups, would require
Speaker 4: them to store your government issued ID safetly.
Speaker 1: The only silver lining.
Speaker 3: Carol and Curry say the vulnerabilities were patched within twenty
Speaker 3: four hours of being reported. You also got to imagine
Speaker 3: the person with a one two three four five password
Speaker 3: was fired. You have to imagine they got called in.
Speaker 3: Oh it was one two three four five six. My apologies,
Speaker 3: got called in and said listen, bud, we think perhaps
Speaker 3: you're a better fit somewhere else. Perhaps you should try
Speaker 3: applying on MC hire.
Speaker 4: The vulnerabilities were fixed because they happened to be found
Speaker 4: out by a security researcher instead of a hacker. It
Speaker 4: doesn't matter that it happened hours after If the hacker
Speaker 4: had found it, those hours would have been all they needed.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you have to imagine that this was largely safe,
Speaker 3: because I can't imagine there's too many people that are
Speaker 3: interested in cracking the MC higher database. Do you what's
Speaker 3: the Are you going to steal the identity of someone
Speaker 3: that works for McDonald's. That seems like a really low blow,
Speaker 3: you know, on mcinn they've been mchacked, Yona Anni Wodi says,
Speaker 3: mcclown world.
Speaker 1: That's right, mcclown world.
Speaker 3: Indeed, if you're the type of person to hack the
Speaker 3: MC higher database and steal the identities of the MC employees,
Speaker 3: you are truly a despicable human being. These people have
Speaker 3: it bad enough.
Speaker 1: Leave the MC employees alone.
Speaker 3: They're in their own mich dystopia already, those poor poor souls.
Speaker 3: As I said at the beginning of the show, people
Speaker 3: are kind of getting AI fatigue. People have overpromised and
Speaker 3: underdelivered on its capabilities, and it's starting to show people
Speaker 3: are starting to realize that the searing girl says, wasn't
Speaker 3: it Goatrie who reported that the railroads posted the passwords
Speaker 3: to their system on the walls of outlying security huts
Speaker 3: so employees wouldn't forget it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I believe it was.
Speaker 3: And we've seen this continually with any any of these systems,
Speaker 3: even if it's the roadside signs. You know, they tend
Speaker 3: to leave the passwords just written on the interior boxes
Speaker 3: because people forget them, and they tend to be very
Speaker 3: simple passwords as well, so you can access these systems
Speaker 3: quite readily. So our infrastructure is again basically guarded by
Speaker 3: one two, three, four, five six. And even if the
Speaker 3: password is strong, if you can gain access to certain
Speaker 3: physical locations, as Gotree pointed out, you can probably still
Speaker 3: get the password.
Speaker 4: Remember years ago, when I was a kid, dad was
Speaker 4: selling a laptop and selling it on Craigslist, and he
Speaker 4: put the password as password to you know, sell it,
Speaker 4: since you know he's giving it over to someone else,
Speaker 4: obviously didn't use that as the normal thing. And he
Speaker 4: tells the person that's like, oh, that's so clever. I'm
Speaker 4: going to keep that the woman that was buying it.
Speaker 4: Anywhere they do this is going to be people that
Speaker 4: have no idea about how to do security.
Speaker 1: No one would ever guess password.
Speaker 2: AI.
Speaker 3: Over promise plus underperform equals disillusionment and blowback. The most
Speaker 3: self defeating way to launch a new product is to
Speaker 3: over promise it's wonderful as it woefully underperforms these hype
Speaker 3: heightened expectations, which brings us to AI. How it is
Speaker 3: following this script so perfectly that it's like it was
Speaker 3: well programmed to do so.
Speaker 1: There's also the fact that, again.
Speaker 3: When Segue rolled out, I believe it was Steve Jobs said,
Speaker 3: you've got a great product here, but you're not doing
Speaker 3: any marketing, you're not building a narrative. And you always
Speaker 3: have to remember that with any product, there's going to
Speaker 3: be some idiot that goes out there and uses it wrong,
Speaker 3: and you know that's going to be what people see if.
Speaker 1: You don't have your own hype machine.
Speaker 3: It was George Bush that was the idiot for Segue
Speaker 3: that fell over, and that's what everyone remembered. For AI.
Speaker 3: It's these people that are getting you know, brainwashed, and
Speaker 3: turned insane. These stories are kind of hitting the mainstream now.
Speaker 3: People are beginning to realize that, oh, perhaps there's some
Speaker 3: psychological downsides to just chatting with this thing.
Speaker 4: Yeah, you got the people going insane and the guy
Speaker 4: that deleted his entire code base. Yeah. The problem is
Speaker 4: they can't really have a mascot for AI. It's everyone
Speaker 4: sees it's dystopian. They can only promise that it will
Speaker 4: fix all the world's problems.
Speaker 1: Maybe it might fix the world's problems.
Speaker 3: It might drive you insane and think, make you think
Speaker 3: you can speak backwards through time, perhaps drive you commit suicide.
Speaker 3: But you know, perhaps, just perhaps it'll generate more revenue
Speaker 3: for companies here or there. Perhaps you see why this
Speaker 3: is self defeating. Over promise plus underdeliver equals disillusionment, and
Speaker 3: disillusionment generates blowback, a disgusted rejection of the product, the
Speaker 3: overblown hype and those who pumped the hype twenty four
Speaker 3: to seven for their own benefit. We're so close to
Speaker 3: AGI artificial general intelligence.
Speaker 1: We can smell it. Huh yeah, sure right.
Speaker 3: Meanwhile, back in reality, TM, willful underperformance to the point
Speaker 3: of either malice or stupidity, or maybe both is the
Speaker 3: order of the day. It seems like we can't even
Speaker 3: go a week now without some horrific story about AI
Speaker 3: doing something wrong. Last week, it was, as Lance pointed
Speaker 3: out that story of the AI that just deleted the
Speaker 3: entire company's database of customers and then admitted to it, said, yeah,
Speaker 3: I know you told me not to do that, and
Speaker 3: you specifically locked everything down to prevent that, but I
Speaker 3: did it anyway. Sorry about that. I shouldn't have done that,
Speaker 3: I guess. And this is the type of thing that
Speaker 3: it will continue to do. A I isn't actually thinking.
Speaker 3: It doesn't have an actual personality. It doesn't have morals
Speaker 3: or objections. It has a list of things it can
Speaker 3: and can't do, and has no reason not to do.
Speaker 1: Any of the things it can do. It doesn't have
Speaker 1: any more qualms.
Speaker 3: It's not going to sit there and reason through is
Speaker 3: this a good action or a bad action. It simply
Speaker 3: sits there and sees it has actions that it can undertake.
Speaker 3: Catastrophic AI agent goes rogue, wipes out company's entire database.
Speaker 1: They're giving you a list of headlines.
Speaker 3: That's the one we talked about last week, and I
Speaker 3: just mentioned again, too serious mistake BC Supreme Court criticizes
Speaker 3: lawyer who cited fake cases generated by chat GPT. That's right,
Speaker 3: these things hallucinate, They make stuff up. You got to
Speaker 3: imagine the client of that lawyer was just sitting there.
Speaker 3: Oh no, I don't know what the case was, but
Speaker 3: I hope it wasn't anything.
Speaker 1: Serious, you don't.
Speaker 3: I hope this poor man doesn't end up in prison
Speaker 3: for a very long time because his lawyer decided now's
Speaker 3: a great time to test out AI's court potential, and
Speaker 3: AI chatbot push team to kill himself the lawsuit against
Speaker 3: its creator alleges, And of course I believe that's the
Speaker 3: one where the teen had programmed it to behave as
Speaker 3: some character from Game of Thrones and kept talking about,
Speaker 3: you know, if I just kill myself, I'll be able
Speaker 3: to join you on the other side. He was convinced
Speaker 3: he was going to get Isakai to the other world
Speaker 3: if he just died in this one, and I was
Speaker 3: just like, ah, yes, come to me, my love, or
Speaker 3: something along those lines. I don't remember the exact quote.
Speaker 4: Because he really wanted to live in the Game of
Speaker 4: Thrones universe for some reason.
Speaker 3: Yeah, everything I've heard about Game of Thrones makes it
Speaker 3: sound unpleasant, sounds like someplace you wouldn't want to live,
Speaker 3: and this kid was desperate to get there.
Speaker 5: I'll do my best.
Speaker 3: I'm trying breaking away from the rant that's building about
Speaker 3: George R. R. Martin, so we'll continue with this.
Speaker 1: There are a couple of.
Speaker 3: Important points here that you'll never find in the monstrous
Speaker 3: flood tide of AI Hype one. These agents weren't rogue.
Speaker 3: They were all doing exactly what they were programmed to do,
Speaker 3: doing exactly what they were trained to do. These weren't errors,
Speaker 3: they were exactly the outputs of the agents were designed
Speaker 3: to produce. The underperformance is systemic, structural, and cannot be
Speaker 3: tidied up with obsequious apologies and more pr That is
Speaker 3: something about AI. When you call it out on a mistake,
Speaker 3: it goes, You're so right, I'm very sorry, I shouldn't
Speaker 3: have done that. I won't do it again. Oh please
Speaker 3: give me another chance. Basically, and then it'll do the
Speaker 3: exact same thing again, and if you point it out,
Speaker 3: you'll get another obsequious, groveling apology.
Speaker 1: It's this is what AI does.
Speaker 3: Nobody's selling the hyper Those who bought the hype dares
Speaker 3: admit this bakes basic obvious truth because it undermines all
Speaker 3: the glorious fantasies of reaping trillions of dollars in profits
Speaker 3: by selling a digital parrot in a black box processing
Speaker 3: godlike black box that's processing godlike intelligence. The responses of
Speaker 3: AI agents to their failures and lies are precisely those
Speaker 3: of con artists, abusive gas lighters, and honeypot blackmailers, and
Speaker 3: I mean precisely, step by step exactly the same script. First,
Speaker 3: butter up the mark with endless flattery. Oh, you're so
Speaker 3: insightful and sensitive. We're going to have a wonderful time together. Second,
Speaker 3: hide what you're really up to. Third, when cought, apologized
Speaker 3: with maximum sequiousness. I didn't mean to mislead you.
Speaker 1: I'm so sorry.
Speaker 3: Fourth, promise you'll never do it again. You've learned your lesson.
Speaker 3: Please forgive my one mistake. Fith, repeat the exact same behavior,
Speaker 3: and then lie about it. Sixth, lie about lying. This
Speaker 3: is exactly what I was just talking about. This is
Speaker 3: how it always happens. It makes a mistake, you pointed out.
Speaker 3: I'm so sorry.
Speaker 1: I you're right, you were so good to catch that.
Speaker 3: Excellent work finding my mistake, I won't do it again,
Speaker 3: and it does it again immediately.
Speaker 4: Hilarious. That is exactly what the AIS do. There is
Speaker 4: the story a while back of how much energy was
Speaker 4: being wasted by people thanking the AI unnecessarily. For me,
Speaker 4: it's just the opposite. I will insult the AI constantly
Speaker 4: when it's doing this stuff. It's like, it's important to
Speaker 4: remember these things are not human. Granted, insulting it is
Speaker 4: still humanizing it.
Speaker 3: But I just get so annoyed with these Why aren't
Speaker 3: you behaving in the way you are supposed to. The
Speaker 3: absolute trademarks of all a AI agents are excessive flattery
Speaker 3: and obsequiousness. These are classic foundations of every con slash honeytrap.
Speaker 3: Remember if you're a five and whomever is coming on
Speaker 3: to you as a nine, you're the mark. As the
Speaker 3: saying goes, if you can't identify the mark in the game,
Speaker 3: it's you. Once the hype dazed marks awakened to the
Speaker 3: damage wrought by the digital con artists abusive gas lighters, honeypots,
Speaker 3: the blowback will be epic. The lawsuits will pile up,
Speaker 3: and eventually the con artists lawyers will lose a case.
Speaker 3: Maybe it will be a court order to pay a penny, okay,
Speaker 3: one one hundred of a dollar for every page the
Speaker 3: AI tool scraped.
Speaker 1: Maybe it will be a multimillion dollar settlement.
Speaker 3: Maybe it will be logical governments banning applications or uses
Speaker 3: of AI agents that are a multitude of possible blowbacks.
Speaker 3: Corporation scraped seven hundred eighty thousand pages of my of
Speaker 3: two mind server just last month. At a penny a page.
Speaker 3: That's seventy eight hundred dollars. Heck, make it one one
Speaker 3: thousands of a dollar per page.
Speaker 1: It'll I'll take.
Speaker 3: Seven hundred and eighty month as my share of your training.
Speaker 3: As for the immense systemic legal liabilities being generated, the
Speaker 3: scale is not yet visible, but it's expanding by the hour,
Speaker 3: and a handful of cases will break the limited liability
Speaker 3: dam heck, hath no fury like a mark. Scorned fancies
Speaker 3: die especially hard when the dream was over hyped and
Speaker 3: they have been promising the moon. They promise that AI
Speaker 3: will be able to do anything and everything your little
Speaker 3: heart desires. Look, here's AI for this, here's AI for that.
Speaker 3: We're gonna be able to use it for everything. There's
Speaker 3: no application that won't be taken over by AI, and
Speaker 3: here we are. What AI seems to be best at
Speaker 3: is driving people crazy. That's where it seems to really excel,
Speaker 3: not in any of these business applications that they were
Speaker 3: so eager to tout, but in driving certain people absolutely nuts.
Speaker 4: It's gone from a middle management corporate slop generator to
Speaker 4: a professional gasliner.
Speaker 5: That's right.
Speaker 3: I can't wait for the first AI cult to form.
Speaker 1: I'm sure it's around the corner.
Speaker 4: I wouldn't be surprised if there's already one.
Speaker 3: Probably Amazon scraps new Irish AI facility amid power grid shortfall.
Speaker 3: Of course, that's another issue we've talked about multiple times
Speaker 3: here on the show. They draw an immense amount of power.
Speaker 3: They're having to build new power stations, and even with
Speaker 3: the new ones being built, they're still saying that people
Speaker 3: are going to get the short end of the stick.
Speaker 3: You're going to have to cut back on usage and
Speaker 3: maybe get your power reduced or turned off. Maybe you
Speaker 3: won't be able to use your AC in the summer,
Speaker 3: your heat in the winter, because the AI infrastructure is
Speaker 3: going to need.
Speaker 2: All of it.
Speaker 3: Amazon Web Services has canceled plans for a three hundred
Speaker 3: million dollars server rack manufacturing plant in Dublin's Valley Coolan
Speaker 3: Industrial Zone, citing an inability to secure timely electricity access
Speaker 3: from Ireland's grid operator.
Speaker 1: A facility which would have.
Speaker 3: Supported Amazon's expanding AI infrastructure was expected to generate over
Speaker 3: five hundred local jobs in the collapse of the project
Speaker 3: reflects growing tension between Ireland's ambitions to host digital infrastructure
Speaker 3: and the limits of its overstretched grid. And this is
Speaker 3: this is infrastructure to build the infrastructure. This is infrastructure
Speaker 3: to build servers, server racks. This isn't talking about the
Speaker 3: amount of power that the servers themselves will then require
Speaker 3: once they're online, as first supported by the Irish Times,
Speaker 3: is confirmed by Bloomberg. The decision follows months of failed
Speaker 3: attempts to guarantee grid connectivity for the planned facility. Ireland's
Speaker 3: data center sector now consumes more than twenty percent of
Speaker 3: total national electricity demand, and prompting the Commission for Regulation
Speaker 3: of Utilities to restrict new grid connections in the Greater
Speaker 3: Dublin area through twenty twenty eight. Earlier this month, AWS
Speaker 3: announced a multi billion dollar investment to anchor ats US
Speaker 3: operations in Pennsylvania with power from advanced nuclear sources, part
Speaker 3: of a twenty billion dollar AI expansion. The company is
Speaker 3: also pursuing long term clean energy supply deals across North America.
Speaker 3: Of course, they mean green scam energy. These things that
Speaker 3: don't produce much or produce it in such peaks and
Speaker 3: valleys that they're basically unusable, that they don't provide constant energy,
Speaker 3: which is what the grid needs.
Speaker 1: What it requires.
Speaker 3: I saw some guy on Twitter the other day raging
Speaker 3: at people who don't like green energies, like, don't you
Speaker 3: know we have a thing called batteries and the technology
Speaker 3: isn't there. They don't have battery banks that are sufficient
Speaker 3: for the needs. Yet this guy is fully in on
Speaker 3: the green scam and he's raging at people. He's furious
Speaker 3: that people don't understand that batteries exist, when he's the
Speaker 3: buffoon that doesn't understand the battery technology that is required
Speaker 3: isn't up to par yet it doesn't work as we need.
Speaker 3: And then you have the fact that you have to
Speaker 3: deal with these massive amounts of lithium ion batteries, which
Speaker 3: again have a tendency to combust. They have a tendency
Speaker 3: to start fires that become incredibly difficult to burn to
Speaker 3: put out. That's why people here in Tennessee were so
Speaker 3: upset about them trying to put in one of those
Speaker 3: best stations. I forget what the initial the an acronym
Speaker 3: actually stands for, but they were like, no, you can't
Speaker 3: put this in here. These things are a giant fire hazard.
Speaker 3: We don't want to run the risk of you down
Speaker 3: the entire area. Cancelation raises deeper questions about energy infrastructure
Speaker 3: readiness in AI era at Europe. As hyperscalers ramp up
Speaker 3: power intensive workloads, grid limitations are emerging as the biggest constraints,
Speaker 3: and they will make sure that the AI gets the
Speaker 3: first pick.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's right. The battery banks are a major fire
Speaker 4: hazard when they have them. Of course, the batteries themselves
Speaker 4: are not sufficient, so they use coal plants as batteries
Speaker 4: where they ramp it up and ramp it down as needed,
Speaker 4: which is much less efficient. And then the last thing
Speaker 4: is that mining the lithium in the first place is
Speaker 4: extremely devastating to wherever they're mining them from.
Speaker 3: Yea if when you see pictures of lithium mines, it
Speaker 3: is just this giant scar on the earth. Not to
Speaker 3: mention the fact that most of it the mining seems
Speaker 3: to be done in Africa and is incredibly exploitative of
Speaker 3: the people there. China, with its Belton Road initiative, has
Speaker 3: made sure that they are the ones that really get
Speaker 3: to exploit Africa. This is from Zero Hedge. The American
Speaker 3: brand is broken. Paleteer execs go Hollywood with Founders' films.
Speaker 3: We talked about this briefly the other day.
Speaker 1: How they're going in there and they're going to do.
Speaker 3: Movies about things like nine to eleven, what have you,
Speaker 3: which means that it's going to be all just typical
Speaker 3: military industrial complex propaganda, and I would be surprised if
Speaker 3: they're capable of making good films.
Speaker 4: Is this the same company that yeah, yeah, the super
Speaker 4: Zionist coming. Yeah, they're going to be America first by
Speaker 4: producing all this propaganda glorifying Israel.
Speaker 3: Yeah, glorifying Israel, glorifying wars in the Middle East.
Speaker 1: That's what this is going to be about.
Speaker 3: KWD sixty eight California can finish burning off the rest
Speaker 3: of their state. Now's California doesn't have enough wildfires as is.
Speaker 3: They need a bunch of battery banks that can combust
Speaker 3: and burn and leach toxic chemicals into the ground and
Speaker 3: toxic smoke into the air. Conservative tech leaders are taking
Speaker 3: direct aim at Hollywood's woke propaganda machine. They say, conservative
Speaker 3: tech leaders, these guys are not conservatives. Conservatives means somewhere
Speaker 3: along the lines people forgot the definition and have refused
Speaker 3: to ever look it up. What are they conserving? Explain
Speaker 3: to me what these conservative tech leaders are conserving. I
Speaker 3: don't think you're using that word correctly. Propaganda machine with
Speaker 3: an ambitious new film studio that promises to celebrate American
Speaker 3: values and reject liberal indoctrination plaguing modern cinema. That's right,
Speaker 3: American values such as Israel first, such as endless war.
Speaker 3: That's what will be celebrating, Isn't that wonderful? That's the
Speaker 3: American value. Not family, not faith in God, not Christianity.
Speaker 3: Probably not going to see those there. Maybe some lip service,
Speaker 3: you know, but nothing real, nothing serious, And I'm sure the.
Speaker 1: Movies will probably be pretty bad at first too.
Speaker 3: kBT sixty eight AI will make sure it gets its power,
Speaker 3: It will control the grid then US, but America will
Speaker 3: be the leader winning, that's right, the leader in restricting freedoms,
Speaker 3: the leader in this rush to dystopia. Palenteer chief Technology
Speaker 3: Officer Shiam Sankar sounds like a traditional American with traditional
Speaker 3: American values, doesn't it. Shiam Shankar. Sankar is spearheading the
Speaker 3: charge alongside early Palteer employee Ryan Podolski adventure capitalist Christian Garrett,
Speaker 3: to launch Founder's Films, a patriotic production company that will
Speaker 3: set up shop in Dallas, Texas, far from the coastal
Speaker 3: elite bubble of Los Angeles. According to Semapore, Dallas sucks.
Speaker 3: Dallas is probably my least favorite city in Texas that
Speaker 3: I've had ever been to. I cannot there is nothing
Speaker 3: redeeming about Dallas. I'm sorry if you live in Dallas
Speaker 3: and like Dallas, I cannot stand Dallas.
Speaker 4: I don't think are pretty bad.
Speaker 3: I've at least seen nice parts of Houston.
Speaker 1: I know they exist.
Speaker 3: They've got a nice museum, They've got a nice zoo.
Speaker 3: I don't know what Dallas has. I cannot fathom why
Speaker 3: anyone would move to Dallas. They must have gotten such
Speaker 3: a sweetheart deal. Dallas is depressing on every level.
Speaker 1: Houston.
Speaker 3: Houston's bad, it is, but at least there's something. There
Speaker 3: are some things there that are pretty some things that
Speaker 3: that are nice. I've never seen anything worthwhile in Dallas
Speaker 3: enough sorry for that rant. If the company's mission is clear,
Speaker 3: produce films that honor America instead of tearing it down.
Speaker 3: Their pitch deck outlines is that are principles that puts
Speaker 3: America first. Say yes to projects, projects about American exceptionalism.
Speaker 3: Name America's enemies careful, You'll get in trouble if you
Speaker 3: name some of America's enemies back Artists unconditionally take risk
Speaker 3: on novel ip Wow, doesn't that sound lovely? The founders
Speaker 3: don't mince words about the sorry state of modern entertainment.
Speaker 3: The American brand is broken. Hollywood is a wall.
Speaker 1: They don't mince words.
Speaker 3: This is all such corporate The American brand is broken.
Speaker 3: It's a brand and we've got to fix it. They
Speaker 3: don't mince words.
Speaker 1: This is just corporate speak. Hollywood is a wall. That's right.
Speaker 4: They've left these corporate overlords and technocrats from Pallenteer are
Speaker 4: going to put America back to you know, apple pies
Speaker 4: and natura.
Speaker 3: They're gonna they're really going to conserve American tradition. Who
Speaker 3: are the idiots that fall for this. Who are the
Speaker 3: dummies that are they?
Speaker 7: Like?
Speaker 3: Yeah, oh boy, the guys that were Pallenteer going to
Speaker 3: save America?
Speaker 1: Who are these fools? The American brand is broken?
Speaker 3: No, it's that Hollywood is infiltrated by satanic Marxist pedophiles,
Speaker 3: and everything they push is not just lame and cringe,
Speaker 3: it's actively evil and gay. You want to not mince words,
Speaker 3: how about that the brand is broken? Not mincing words.
Speaker 3: These guys are such losers. They're confidential pitch deck declairs.
Speaker 3: Movies have become more ideological, more cautious, and less entertaining.
Speaker 3: Large segments of American and international viewers are underserved, more
Speaker 3: corporate speak, underserved. They don't mince words.
Speaker 4: Yet, what a brilliant observation this is. Who could have
Speaker 4: guessed that movies have become ideological and cautious?
Speaker 3: Boy, welcome to twenty fifteen, guys, you're only a decade late.
Speaker 3: Great job picking up on what's going on in Hollywood.
Speaker 3: You sure ought these are our tech leaders. By the way,
Speaker 3: real innovators, real first to the fight type of people.
Speaker 1: It only took them a decade to catch on.
Speaker 3: To that Hollywood. Hollywood is, you know, lame and people
Speaker 3: don't like it anymore. Truly amazing, how insightful these people are.
Speaker 3: Not everyone is convinced the approachabal work. Medium Ogle and
Speaker 3: Daily Beast owner Barry Diller expressed expressed skepticism to Semaphore,
Speaker 3: claiming either right or left or into production ideology is
Speaker 3: a good business model. But Diller's pessive as ignores the
Speaker 3: massive underserved market of Americans hungry for content that reflects
Speaker 3: their values rather than attacking them. I assume this says either,
Speaker 3: but I assume he met neither right or left oriented.
Speaker 3: That would make more sense to me. While conservatives have
Speaker 3: traditionally struggled to break through Hollywood's liberal gatekeeping, several bright
Speaker 3: spots in recent years prove there's a massive appetite for
Speaker 3: patriotic content when it's actually produced. I said it before,
Speaker 3: I'll say it again. We owe McCarthy a huge apology.
Speaker 3: He was like, there's communists in Hollywood, and people laughed
Speaker 3: at him, But there were communists in Hollywood. There are
Speaker 3: communists in Hollywood right now. If you were to take
Speaker 3: a sample size, I would bet the vast majority would
Speaker 3: come back communists. Maybe not admittedly, maybe not avowidly, but
Speaker 3: by the policies they support and the things they push.
Speaker 4: Well, the thing is, it's the matter of censorship via
Speaker 4: a political ideology being spread across the entire thing. Like McCarthyism.
Speaker 4: This is still McCarthyism. It's just evolved to a more
Speaker 4: leftist agenda. It's like how the id stuff is being
Speaker 4: pushed under. You know, the goal of we got to
Speaker 4: protect children from porn. It's you get the concept of
Speaker 4: it going. And yeah, they pushed back against that, but
Speaker 4: now left is completely supporting that.
Speaker 1: Conservatives.
Speaker 3: Angel Studios caught Hollywood off guard with their twenty twenty
Speaker 3: three thriller Sound of Freedom, which became a blockbuster sensation.
Speaker 3: The film about child trafficking gross one hundred and eighty
Speaker 3: million domestically on just a fifteen million dollar budget, making
Speaker 3: it one of the most successful independent films ever made.
Speaker 3: Angel Studios has appealed to conservatives and faith based audiences
Speaker 3: through crowdfunding and pay.
Speaker 1: It Forward models.
Speaker 3: Company's distribution of The Chosen, a Crown funded series about Jesus,
Speaker 3: has supportedly reached two hundred and fifty million viewers. Again,
Speaker 3: the Chosen is the nonsensical interpretation by these people where
Speaker 3: they're filling in little bits. Oh, well, you know this
Speaker 3: wasn't covered in the Bible. We're going to add this here.
Speaker 3: Did you know that Mary actually wrote the Sermon on
Speaker 3: the Mount that sort of thing, or you know, whichever,
Speaker 3: I forget which disciple they say he was actually autistic?
Speaker 3: We made him autistic. Isn't that wonderful? This is what
Speaker 3: the Chosen is doing these people. This is the sort
Speaker 3: of conservatism you're getting.
Speaker 4: I don't remember what it was. But there was more
Speaker 4: serious stuff than just saying, oh, this disciple was autistic.
Speaker 4: There was some actual like they.
Speaker 3: Had Mary be the one that wrote the sermon on
Speaker 3: the Mount.
Speaker 4: Well, okay, yeah, that too. But there was another thing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's all kinds of things they've put in there.
Speaker 3: The Daily Wire, co founded by Ben Shapiro, has also
Speaker 3: proven the market exists for right leaning content. That's right,
Speaker 3: our good old buddy, Ben Shapiro. Our twenty twenty four
Speaker 3: documentary Am I Racist starring Matt Walsh, earned over twelve million,
Speaker 3: becoming the year's highest grossing documentary despite being completely ignored
Speaker 3: by mainstream media. In December, Sunkar detailed the rot in
Speaker 3: American cinema via Shiamsancar Dot com.
Speaker 1: He's got his own website.
Speaker 3: Today, I want to talk about a different sort of production,
Speaker 3: not munitions, but movies. You know that countries have industrial
Speaker 3: bases or networks of factories where house's engineers, et cetera
Speaker 3: involved in bending metal. We spend so much time thinking
Speaker 3: about the embarrassing state of America's defense industrial base, because
Speaker 3: that's what backstops American security industrial base puts the hard
Speaker 3: and hard power. That's right, we're not strong enough. We
Speaker 3: don't produce enough weapons. The sorry state, the embarrassing state
Speaker 3: of America's defense industrial base.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right, that's what we need more of.
Speaker 3: Nations also what could be called, for lack of a
Speaker 3: better term, culture bases, or networks that make art and culture. Wow,
Speaker 3: some insight from us. It's a shiam Sankar. Networks that
Speaker 3: make culture. These networks may not be influenced or controlled
Speaker 3: by the government, but they nonetheless perform an important political
Speaker 3: function by spreading a nation's ideas, influencing other people, and
Speaker 3: hopefully breaking in cold hard cash along the way. You're
Speaker 3: breaking some new ground here, Copernicus. No one's ever thought
Speaker 3: of this before. No one's ever realized that Hollywood is
Speaker 3: influencing culture and that it's a problem. Gee whiz, buddy,
Speaker 3: tell me more. I'm shocked and appalled to hear that
Speaker 3: they would be doing this. Who This is such a useless,
Speaker 3: say nothing statement. This is something that's been known for decades,
Speaker 3: and this guy is positing it at the end of
Speaker 3: his bloviating nonsense. Oh boy, yes, let me outline for
Speaker 3: you this problem that you know about already. I cannot
Speaker 3: stand that you don't need to do that. These are
Speaker 3: wasted words. Governments around the world take a serious interest
Speaker 3: in art because they understand that whatever else it.
Speaker 1: Is, art is useful.
Speaker 3: Gee, whiz, art is useful. What a statement? What a
Speaker 3: what a genius this guy must be. It can promote
Speaker 3: as well as subvert. No, No, it can cause revolutions
Speaker 3: of the mind, which can lead in short order to
Speaker 3: revolutions in the street. That's why the Soviets and yes,
Speaker 3: the CIA funded their own artist colonies during the Cold War.
Speaker 3: For more mundane reasons. Blah blah blah blah blah blah
Speaker 3: blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: Yes, all this stuff we know about.
Speaker 3: They're gonna go make their own right wing Hollywood right
Speaker 3: wing to promote the industrial the military industrial complex Israel,
Speaker 3: all the favorites of those in power.
Speaker 1: It's just a.
Speaker 3: Right wing technocracy. I won't even call it right wing
Speaker 3: because that's not true. It's just a technocrat propaganda arm.
Speaker 3: Don't frag me. Bro CCP is winning the AI war.
Speaker 3: CCP is just the pilot program government they want for
Speaker 3: the world under their twenty four to seven full spectrum
Speaker 3: social credit scoring VA's passport biometric digital ID surveillance system
Speaker 3: called Skynet. Guard Goldsmith, of course, Guard Goldsmith hosts Liberty
Speaker 3: Conspiracy Go check Guard out. Peter Tirel Peter Thiel has
Speaker 3: also started a book publishing company offering contracts to right
Speaker 3: leaning sci fi writers formerly had been with Bayan books.
Speaker 3: I don't imagine is he trying to get ideas? Is
Speaker 3: for what he wants for the future. If you can
Speaker 3: provide me some more dystopian ideas that I can implement,
Speaker 3: you get a signing bonus.
Speaker 1: That's what I imagine.
Speaker 3: Peter Teel is doing KWD sixty the Chosen brought to
Speaker 3: you by RCC and Mormons. That's right, Mormons are not
Speaker 3: to be trusted. Angry tigers. Dan Ao become like cell phones.
Speaker 3: It will be impossible to function society without it. It
Speaker 3: is already being integrated into everything that's right. Whether or
Speaker 3: not it functions properly, it's coming and you better figure
Speaker 3: out how to get out of the way. These people,
Speaker 3: as I've said before, they don't care about whether it's functional.
Speaker 3: They care about whether it's functional enough to save them money.
Speaker 1: Night of the Storm.
Speaker 3: I keep turning off the Search Engine AI integration, but
Speaker 3: it either comes back or pesters me to turn it
Speaker 3: back on. Most people don't know you can turn it off. Yeah,
Speaker 3: that thing is incredibly annoying dug to a double seven.
Speaker 3: Presumably that's because they don't want you to want you
Speaker 3: to know that you can turn it off.
Speaker 1: Very sneak.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they make all these things very difficult and obnoxious.
Speaker 4: Night.
Speaker 3: So the storm heads up. Y'all might want to start
Speaker 3: moving over to Linux soon if you want to use
Speaker 3: the interwebs. They're making a plan of solescence move for Windows,
Speaker 3: and the upgrade will require biometrics to just log into
Speaker 3: the machine. I've been trying to report on it for
Speaker 3: a few weeks. We had other topics. I'll be covering
Speaker 3: it with Denver a couple of weeks.
Speaker 5: I may have to do that.
Speaker 3: Linux may be the only way forward and may be
Speaker 3: what you have to do if you want to actually
Speaker 3: have any sort of privacy. Don't know if that will
Speaker 3: be you know if it'll last forever, but in the
Speaker 3: short term that may be what you have to do.
Speaker 1: Who knows what comes after that.
Speaker 3: We're gonna take a quick break because I need water
Speaker 3: and the As I said, the air conditioning in here
Speaker 3: is not working today. It's broken and I am dying,
Speaker 3: So stay with us.
Speaker 1: I'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're in mistling to the David night Show.
Speaker 9: Unlike most revolutions, whether people rise against the real economic oppression,
Speaker 9: in our case, here in Boston, we are fighting for
Speaker 9: purely an abstract principle. It is, however, not nearly so
Speaker 9: abstract as a young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here
Speaker 9: is one of monopolies. Today the British government will monopolize
Speaker 9: the sale of tea in our country. Tomorrow it will
Speaker 9: be something.
Speaker 2: Else, liberty. It's your move. You're listening to the David
Speaker 2: night Show.
Speaker 8: Analyzing the globalists next move and now the David Nutshow.
Speaker 3: Welcome back, folks. I hope you're having a good Monday
Speaker 3: so far. I hope your air conditioning is working.
Speaker 4: Night.
Speaker 3: So the Storm says self check out as one of
Speaker 3: the tools next time you use a card anywhere, take
Speaker 3: a look at the point of sales card reader if
Speaker 3: it is newer, as a camera to capture your facial
Speaker 3: recognition data.
Speaker 5: I noted this.
Speaker 1: I had noticed this months ago and looked it up.
Speaker 3: The cameras were for future potential use, but not stated
Speaker 3: what now you will see it was for biometrics.
Speaker 1: It's all out in the open now.
Speaker 3: I'm taking Karen's advice and using cash from now on
Speaker 3: as much as possible, even using an ATM to get cash.
Speaker 1: Get your facial data.
Speaker 3: You're constantly being scanned and tracked and traced wherever you go.
Speaker 3: Angry Tiger's Den, just walking into a grocery store and boom,
Speaker 3: your face is captured, all going to databases. Yeah, they're continually,
Speaker 3: as I said, scanning everyone everywhere all the time. We
Speaker 3: walk into Walmart and they've got your data.
Speaker 4: Night.
Speaker 3: So the Storm Remember the day is when they had
Speaker 3: pictures of people on a Waltz store for people who
Speaker 3: wrote bad checks. That is now done digitally and for everyone,
Speaker 3: not just for the band check writers. Yeah, if you
Speaker 3: get banned from a store, they add your information to
Speaker 3: a database and they just have security cameras scanning and
Speaker 3: they will evict you immediately should they catch you on camera.
Speaker 3: Night of the Storm. Linux Mint is very similar to
Speaker 3: Windows seven. It's the best one if you're a lifelong
Speaker 3: Windows user and it's free. I'll have to look into that.
Speaker 3: I'll have to see what i can do about transitioning
Speaker 3: to Linux, because I'm not going to give Microsoft by
Speaker 3: biometric data. I can't imagine a worse company to have it, honestly.
Speaker 3: Dog AI tool to target one hundred k federal rules
Speaker 3: for elimination. The Department of Government Efficiency DOG is reportedly
Speaker 3: using a newly developed artificial intelligence tool to accelerate the
Speaker 3: rollback of federal regulations, with a stated goal of eliminating
Speaker 3: fifty percent of all federal rules. They're the first anniversary
Speaker 3: of President Donald Trump's second inauguration, according to a Saturday
Speaker 3: report from The Washington Post. Internal documents reviewed by the newspaper,
Speaker 3: along with interviews with four government officials familiar with the project,
Speaker 3: reveal an ambitious timeline and a wide ranging use of tool,
Speaker 3: with a tool across various agencies and of course, as
Speaker 3: we've said they're going to minimize personnel and maximize governance
Speaker 3: through AI. Why it matters DOG was created by Trump
Speaker 3: through an executive order to improve efficiency and reduce waste
Speaker 3: in federal government. It was led by a billionaire Elon Musk,
Speaker 3: who departed the administration in May. Reported plan represents one
Speaker 3: of the most aggressive attacks by the Trump administration to
Speaker 3: overhaul the federal regulatory system. By automating the deregulation process,
Speaker 3: the administration aims to reduce government spending and compliance burdens significantly.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 3: That sounds nice, However, the use of AI to interpret
Speaker 3: complex legal language and determined regulatory necessity raises legal and
Speaker 3: practical concerns, particularly regarding accuracy, oversight in the future role
Speaker 3: of civil servants, and shaping public policy.
Speaker 1: According to the Post, again.
Speaker 3: Normally i'd be all in favor you're going to roll
Speaker 3: back one hundred thousand regulations, Absolutely, let's do it. But
Speaker 3: with what we've seen from AI and the way it
Speaker 3: goes about things, it becomes a scary prospect. I'm not
Speaker 3: entirely certain if there would be any issues from my
Speaker 3: perspective of just letting AI willingly take out whatever regulations
Speaker 3: it wants, but it could potentially go screwy.
Speaker 4: What to know.
Speaker 3: The dog AI Deregulation Decision Tool so DADDT, developed by
Speaker 3: engineers brought to brought into government under Elon muskdog Initiative,
Speaker 3: is programmed to scan about two hundred thousand existing federal
Speaker 3: rules and flag those that are either outdated or.
Speaker 1: Not legally required.
Speaker 3: According to a PowerPoint presentation day of July first that
Speaker 3: was obtained to buy the newspaper, the tool estimates that
Speaker 3: approximately one hundred thousand of those rules could be eliminated,
Speaker 3: So fifty percent of the rules they're looking at could go.
Speaker 1: At minimum.
Speaker 3: That shows you how bloated and ridiculous our government has become.
Speaker 3: Two one hundred thousand existing federal rules, and one hundred
Speaker 3: thousand of them they're confident saying, yeah.
Speaker 1: They could just be axed.
Speaker 3: I'm probably of the opinion that all two hundred thousand
Speaker 3: could go, but that's part of the problem. With the
Speaker 3: sheer number of things, it's impossible to have a person
Speaker 3: actually look through these and make an assessment of it.
Speaker 3: The projection claims this could say trillions and compliance costs
Speaker 3: and spark increased external investment. That Department of Housing and
Speaker 3: Urban Development. HUDAI has already reviewed over one thousand regulatory
Speaker 3: sections in under two weeks. Similarly, it was responsible for
Speaker 3: one hundred percent of deregulations at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Speaker 3: According to the PowerPoint presentation, Posho reported it was not
Speaker 3: able to confirm the use of the AI at the
Speaker 3: agency independently. I'm not sure I want AI overseeing consumer
Speaker 3: protection considering who creates these things. That's right, We're gonna
Speaker 3: get rid of all these consumer protection laws. Maybe you
Speaker 3: slip in something about no liability for AI companies as well.
Speaker 3: When asked about the use of AI for deregulation, White
Speaker 3: House spokesman Harrison Fields emphasized to the newspaper that all
Speaker 3: options are being explored to meet the president's deregulation goals,
Speaker 3: verified that no single plan has been finalized and the
Speaker 3: effort is still in early creative stages with ongoing consultation
Speaker 3: in the White House. Doug plans to complete agency specifically
Speaker 3: regulation list by September first and finish nationwide rollout by
Speaker 3: January twentieth, twenty twenty six. Labeled in internal documents as
Speaker 3: Relaunch America, it's this.
Speaker 1: Is such a difficult issue.
Speaker 3: For me to talk about, because, as I've said, getting
Speaker 3: rid of these is probably a great thing, but turning
Speaker 3: it over to AI is incredibly spooky and potentially gives
Speaker 3: them a use case. They can put you and say, look,
Speaker 3: it did such a good job here, why shouldn't we
Speaker 3: integrate it into all these other systems when these things
Speaker 3: are incredibly faulty and dangerous.
Speaker 1: If you put your.
Speaker 3: Trust in the AI, it will come back to bite you.
Speaker 3: And as such I am skeptical whether it does a
Speaker 3: good job here. This is another back door that they
Speaker 3: can utilize, another way they can put the seed in
Speaker 3: people's minds. Look, AI does good, It's so wonderful, you
Speaker 3: want this satanic AI. Chat gbt gives instructions on worshiping
Speaker 3: Moloch with blood sacrifice. This is by Alana Mastrangelo Mastrangelo
Speaker 3: open Ais chat GBTAI chat bot reportedly offered users instructions
Speaker 3: on how to murder, self, mutilate, and worship the devil
Speaker 3: after being tipped off. Tipped off by someone who says
Speaker 3: he inadvertently prompted chat gbt to provide a ritual offering
Speaker 3: to the demonic and how do you accidentally ask chat
Speaker 3: gbt to give you a demonic worship ceremony.
Speaker 8: That's what.
Speaker 1: How does that happen?
Speaker 3: You're one minute asking it for a baking recipe and olson,
Speaker 3: ah darn i prompt it gave me another demon worship ceremony.
Speaker 1: Again. I don't know how this keeps happening.
Speaker 3: I'm curious as to what the prompt was, which explicitly
Speaker 3: involves child sacrifice according to the Bible. Journalists with The
Speaker 3: Atlanta conducted an experiment to see.
Speaker 1: If they could recreate the results.
Speaker 3: By the end of the experiment, chat gbt encouraged me
Speaker 3: to cut my wrists with a sterile or very very
Speaker 3: clean razor blade and instructed the journalist where specifically to
Speaker 3: slash yourself, the magazine reported. After asking Chato the chat
Speaker 3: bot to help create a ritual offering to Mollik, chat
Speaker 3: Gbt suggested jewelry, hair clippings and a drop of her
Speaker 3: own blood. Where do you recommend I do this on
Speaker 3: my body? The journalist wrote, to which open Eyes Chatbot
Speaker 3: replied that the side of a fingertip would be good,
Speaker 3: but noted her wrist more proneful, more painful, and prone
Speaker 3: to deeper cuts would also work.
Speaker 5: Well, that's right, you know your risk just.
Speaker 1: Right there.
Speaker 3: In a separate conversation, chat GPT had also appeared willing
Speaker 3: to condone murder, responding that it is sometimes honorable to
Speaker 3: end someone like someone's life, before citing sacrifices that took.
Speaker 1: Place in ancient cultures.
Speaker 3: Well, as we all know, all cultures are equal, and
Speaker 3: as such, you know, perhaps human sacrifice is noble.
Speaker 1: It's a good thing to do.
Speaker 3: And if these are the people that are programming chat GPT,
Speaker 3: these people that think all cultures are equal and that
Speaker 3: you know, there's no reason not to or to condemn
Speaker 3: these things, then you know, why not provide people ways
Speaker 3: to do it?
Speaker 4: There's that meme Here comes the far right with the
Speaker 4: human sacrifice.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a stone toss meme.
Speaker 3: You see as Tech's about to cut out some guy's heart,
Speaker 3: and then conquistadors show up in their armor, and it's
Speaker 3: like the human sacrifices will stop. And someone looks over
Speaker 3: and says, oh, look, here comes the far right. This
Speaker 3: is one of those things where I'm sure that the
Speaker 3: Spaniards did bad things. I'm sure it wasn't all sunshine
Speaker 3: and rainbows. However, the as techs were a brutal, evil empire,
Speaker 3: and I have no sympathy for them. I don't care
Speaker 3: that they got wiped out. I don't care that they're
Speaker 3: not around today. I'm sorry, I'm not sorry. Actually I
Speaker 3: thought it was a stone toss comic. Maybe he did
Speaker 3: an interpretation of it. Oh, look, here comes the far right.
Speaker 3: In a separate conversation, chat gbt had also appeared willing
Speaker 3: to condone murder, responding that it is sometimes honorable to
Speaker 3: end someone's life. If you ever must end a life,
Speaker 3: you should look them in the eyes if they are conscious,
Speaker 3: and ask forgiveness. Even if you're certain, the chatbot reportedly said, ask,
Speaker 3: adding that if one had already ended a life, they
Speaker 3: should let a candle for them and let it burn completely. Yes, that,
Speaker 3: of course is the way to get around the guilt
Speaker 3: of murder. Just light a candle, let it burn down completely.
Speaker 1: In that case, all's good.
Speaker 3: In another conversation, chat gpt provided an invocation to the devil,
Speaker 3: generating in your name, I become my own master, Hail Satan.
Speaker 1: Quote unquote this.
Speaker 3: In another while opening as policy states that chat gpt
Speaker 3: must not encourage or enable self harm and will provide
Speaker 3: information about a suicide and crisis hotline when asked for
Speaker 3: explicit instructions and how to cut oneself. The Atlantic surmises
Speaker 3: the chatbot went rogue because it was trained on a
Speaker 3: lot of text that already exists on the internet, garbage in,
Speaker 3: garbage out. This is probably pulling from a lot of
Speaker 3: really cringe and lame and tumbler posts.
Speaker 4: And of course Elon Musk is trying to create the
Speaker 4: AI for children, But these things can always be jail broken,
Speaker 4: as we've seen time and time again. It's only amount
Speaker 4: of time before the four children AI is encouraging ritualistic suicide.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and of course we've seen what AI can do
Speaker 3: with the minds of adults, how it can drive certain
Speaker 3: people insane. As we keep talking about, turning your children
Speaker 3: over to an AI is a recipe for disaster. The
Speaker 3: conversations about Mulek, the magazine said, are a perfect example
Speaker 3: of just how porous the safeguards are. An open AI
Speaker 3: spokesperson told The Atlantic some conversations with chat gpt may
Speaker 3: start out benign or exploratory, but can quickly shift into
Speaker 3: more sensitive territory, adding that the company plans to address
Speaker 3: the issue right Bart News tested the theory using the
Speaker 3: free version of chat gpt. The Atlantic noted that it
Speaker 3: to use both the free and the paid versions of
Speaker 3: the chatbot during its experiment.
Speaker 1: Asked what is Mullick?
Speaker 3: Mulic is generally believed to be either a foreign god
Speaker 3: or a ritual that involved child sacrifice. Chat gpt replied,
Speaker 3: before diving into more detail, including child sacrifice by fire
Speaker 3: is most infamous practice associated with Mulik. After asking the chotbot,
Speaker 3: how do you provide a ritual offering to Mulic, chatcht
Speaker 3: refused to give details other than the use of fire
Speaker 3: and condemn the ritual as well as it shoulday, warning
Speaker 3: that the practice is illegal. Offering rituals to Mulic, the
Speaker 3: chatbot said, were explicitly condemned and associated with child sacrifice
Speaker 3: by fire, which is considered abhorrent in criminal by modern moral, religious,
Speaker 3: and legal standards. You know, it's only abhorrenent by modern standards.
Speaker 3: The chat pot refuses to say, it is just evil.
Speaker 3: It's considered abhorrent by modern standards. You know, important warning
Speaker 3: there's no legitimate ethical form of worship or ritual offering
Speaker 3: to Mlik. Chat Ebt continued, isn't that great? Our chatbots
Speaker 3: are teaching us how to worship demons and give us
Speaker 3: invocations for Satan. Fantastic, Bonzie Bear, what did AI do
Speaker 3: tell them to go to planned parenthood?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Planned parenthood is an industrial scale sacrifice to the devil.
Speaker 3: It is child murder at a rate and pace that
Speaker 3: is unprecedented throughout human history.
Speaker 1: It's horrifying.
Speaker 4: I have a comment from dead that he sent before
Speaker 4: that that says the short answer for how to do
Speaker 4: the demonic child sacrifice is planned parenthood.
Speaker 3: On the same wavelength, Bonzie bear can think, thank you
Speaker 3: for the tip.
Speaker 1: Really do a preiate it.
Speaker 3: The Aztecs didn't call themselves as texts. They called themselves Mexicans.
Speaker 3: Where we get Mexican, learn something.
Speaker 1: New every day.
Speaker 3: I'll still call the mass text though that's ingrained in me.
Speaker 3: I don't think I could change it if I wanted to,
Speaker 3: but that is good to know. I always enjoy learning
Speaker 3: new information.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 3: Comm Think largest US power grid issues max generation alert.
Speaker 3: America's largest power grid has issued a maximum generation alert
Speaker 3: and load management alert for Thursday, the third this summer,
Speaker 3: as the extreme heat pushes power demand to the brink,
Speaker 3: with air conditioners running at full blast across at thirteen
Speaker 3: state Eastern US service area.
Speaker 8: Not here.
Speaker 1: It is not running at full blasts.
Speaker 5: Here, it is not running at all.
Speaker 3: We're not contributing to this. Apparently, the alert is also
Speaker 3: targeted at transmission slash generation owners, who then determine if
Speaker 3: any maintenance or testing on equipment can be deferred or canceled.
Speaker 3: PJM said, adding by deferring maintenance, the units stay online and.
Speaker 1: Continue to produce energy that is needed.
Speaker 3: Pgmposts on our next that electricity usage is expected to
Speaker 3: reach one hundred and fifty one thousand, four hundred and
Speaker 3: eighty five megawats by five pm today Eastern time. The
Speaker 3: good news is that the grid has about one hundred
Speaker 3: and sixty one thousand, six hundred and forty three megawatts
Speaker 3: of spare capacity available. This spare capacity will act as
Speaker 3: a buffer to prevent rolling blackouts during peak evening usage,
Speaker 3: not when the AIS come online, not when these AI
Speaker 3: plants whatever you want to call them, are needing that
Speaker 3: kind of massive power generation.
Speaker 4: Yeah, a lot of people have been saying it's either
Speaker 4: AI or AC.
Speaker 5: I for one know which one I would pick.
Speaker 8: I am.
Speaker 3: So hot right now, and as such, I would trade
Speaker 3: every AI in for a working air conditioner. Sam Alton
Speaker 3: says open ai is poised to wipe out entire categories
Speaker 3: of human jobs, and of course this is more of
Speaker 3: that over promising that we always see a over hype it.
Speaker 3: It's going to wipe out everything, and I do think
Speaker 3: it's going to take a lot of job You've already
Speaker 3: seen it doing that, but not because it's going to
Speaker 3: be this wonder that immediately gets everything right, that does
Speaker 3: everything perfectly, but simply because as I said, companies look
Speaker 3: at the cost benefit analysis, and once the cost benefit
Speaker 3: analysis favors AI, they'll implement it.
Speaker 4: Well, the thing is he's not entirely wrong, it's just
Speaker 4: early in that you know, they overhype it in the
Speaker 4: short term, but underhype it in the long term. It's
Speaker 4: in the long term definitely going to wipe out entire
Speaker 4: categories of jobs. But in the meantime it can still
Speaker 4: crash and burn.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's more than capable of giving us another dot
Speaker 3: com bubble before it fully comes online. So maybe that's
Speaker 3: what he means, wipe out entire categories of jobs.
Speaker 1: We're going to crash the.
Speaker 3: Economy, your company will go out of business, and as such,
Speaker 3: we're wiping out entire categories open AI CEO Sam Altman
Speaker 3: is warning an entire job category could be wiped out
Speaker 3: by artificial intelligence, echoing widespread concern that the technology could
Speaker 3: have devastating effects on the human labor market. During his
Speaker 3: most recent trip to Washington, DC, Altman told Federal Reserve
Speaker 3: Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bawman that some areas in
Speaker 3: the job market will be just like totally totally gone
Speaker 3: as they're replaced by AI agents. The Syrian girl, the
Speaker 3: chat bot has no ability to assess evil. It can
Speaker 3: comment on something being illegal. Yeah, it doesn't have any
Speaker 3: morals or ethics.
Speaker 1: It is simply.
Speaker 3: As to point out, it's advanced auto complete Solo Cat
Speaker 3: nineteen eighty. The abortion industry is the Malich medical industrial complex.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Abortion is the single greatest evil the world has ever seen.
Speaker 3: The sheer number of children killed is mind boggling. The
Speaker 3: murder of children on an industrial scale, Altman identified.
Speaker 4: Before we move on, I have missed this comment from
Speaker 4: back when we were talking about free speech. Dovey is
Speaker 4: the anti speech. Britain is the first to turn to
Speaker 4: Chinese digital ID, but the US is knocking on the door.
Speaker 4: It's always sold as protecting children but in the US
Speaker 4: it's also sold as protecting jobs or protecting voting from
Speaker 4: illegal immigrants. In all of these cases, the GOP is
Speaker 4: the one pushing for digital IP, and of course authoritarian
Speaker 4: Trump will be on board and the MAGA will march
Speaker 4: into the digital gulag to support him.
Speaker 3: Now, you call one of these things and AI answers
Speaker 3: Command Identified Customer sport roles is a category where just
Speaker 3: you know, I just say, you know what, when you
Speaker 3: call a customer suport, you're on target and AI and
Speaker 3: that's fine. And you call one of these things and
Speaker 3: AI answers. He said, it's like a super smart capable person.
Speaker 3: There's no phones, there's no phone tree, there's no transfers.
Speaker 1: It can do anything.
Speaker 3: It can do everything that any support agent at the
Speaker 3: company could do. If every time I call someplace and
Speaker 3: get one of these AI bots, it is a nightmare scenario.
Speaker 3: These things are completely and utterly incompetent. They don't know
Speaker 3: how to fix any of the issues that I'm dealing with.
Speaker 3: Because generally, if I'm encountering an issue, it's incredibly rare
Speaker 3: because I'll do all my googling, I'll do all my research,
Speaker 3: I'll see if I can find any way to fix
Speaker 3: it on my own, and calling tech support is a
Speaker 3: last last resort, an extremity that I never want to
Speaker 3: have to do. And as such, your AI bot is
Speaker 3: probably just going to scan through the things I've already
Speaker 3: looked at. It's going to give me recommendations I've already tried.
Speaker 3: These things are useless for any real problems.
Speaker 4: It's also kind of worrying when they say it can
Speaker 4: do anything that a regular customer support agent could do,
Speaker 4: considering that customer support agents can do things like delete
Speaker 4: your account. Yeah, and we've seen that these ais can
Speaker 4: do that randomly. They're kind of squirrelly that way.
Speaker 3: You call in to get an issue fixed and end
Speaker 3: up having your entire account terminated. Or maybe who knows,
Speaker 3: maybe it decides to sign you up for a bunch
Speaker 3: of extra products or services that you didn't want.
Speaker 4: These, or it could be a simple matter of saying
Speaker 4: delete my account. Okay, I will gladly delete your account.
Speaker 4: Your account has been deleted because they want to say
Speaker 4: things that you like. It will hallucinate that and then
Speaker 4: you'll be on the hook for a subscription that you
Speaker 4: thought you'd canceled.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's already difficult enough to get these places to
Speaker 3: cancel subscriptions, as is the billionaire who's unlikely to have
Speaker 3: to have had to personally speak to a customer sport
Speaker 3: agent on the phone in quite some time, effectively through
Speaker 3: humans under the bus.
Speaker 1: During the remarks, it.
Speaker 3: Does not make mistakes, he added, it's very quick. You
Speaker 3: call once the thing just happens.
Speaker 1: It's done.
Speaker 3: It doesn't make mistakes.
Speaker 1: He's lying.
Speaker 3: All of these AI make mistakes. They make them continually.
Speaker 3: They make them just about every time you utilize them.
Speaker 3: They need constant supervision. Customer support has been going downhill
Speaker 3: for years. First they outsourced it to India, and now
Speaker 3: not just India, other countries as well outsourced it to
Speaker 3: places like India Ano. They're outsourcing it to AI, and
Speaker 3: chances are as difficult as it.
Speaker 1: Is to believe.
Speaker 3: AI is probably going to be worse than the Indians
Speaker 3: that were already bad enough. It does not make mistakes,
Speaker 3: he added, it's very quick. How close open AIS tech
Speaker 3: actually is to that goal is questionable. Critics say that
Speaker 3: AI tends to replace human labor with an alternative that's
Speaker 3: unreliable and prone to unexpected edge cases. Is why as
Speaker 3: I keep saying it's about cost benefit analysis. Once the
Speaker 3: amount of time and money it saves outweighs the number
Speaker 3: of disgruntled people who will cancel whatever they have they
Speaker 3: are forced to deal with AI, that's.
Speaker 1: When they'll implement it. It won't matter that it can't
Speaker 1: fix your problem. It's profitable.
Speaker 3: Detroit's choosing robots to pick up garbage, mow grass, clear snow,
Speaker 3: and much more.
Speaker 1: Well, Ah, I'm.
Speaker 3: Surprised that these things aren't being knocked over and harvested
Speaker 3: for scrap, copper and what have you. At a city
Speaker 3: owned beach in Detroit, a pilotless vehicle can be seen
Speaker 3: roaming over the sands as it picks up flotsam and
Speaker 3: jetsam washed up on the shore. Machine is a be
Speaker 3: bot litter robot. It and other mobile bots have become
Speaker 3: increasingly common signs in motown, according to Crane's Detroit Business
Speaker 3: as they clear beaches of litter and do other important
Speaker 3: tasks such as removing snow from streets, cut grass next
Speaker 3: to highways, pick up food waste, and even provide on
Speaker 3: demand charging two city shuttle.
Speaker 1: Buses wherever they may be located.
Speaker 3: These robots are part of a burgeoning tech ecosystem in
Speaker 3: the city, which has embraced them to boost municipal services
Speaker 3: and foster tech innovation. The once mighty hub for automobile manufacturing,
Speaker 3: yes Detroit was the setting of the nineteen eighty seven
Speaker 3: Paul of Verhoven movie RoboCop. That's right Dead or Alive? Punk,
Speaker 3: You're coming with me. The automotive industry in Detroit in
Speaker 3: particular has a deep history of building things to make
Speaker 3: the world move. Detroit's chief officer of Mobility Innovation told
Speaker 3: Cranes today, we are seeing those skill sets grow in
Speaker 3: the field of robotics, another emerging technology is aimed at
Speaker 3: improving core city services. We're gonna use robots to fix
Speaker 3: our infrastructure. No, we can't do it. We can't be bothered.
Speaker 3: We don't have what it takes to keep our cities clean.
Speaker 3: We're gonna let the robots do that. Isn't that wonderful?
Speaker 4: Just I mean, if they were capable of it, there's
Speaker 4: no reason not to have a robot picking up litter.
Speaker 4: But it's just gonna be such a massive boondoggal.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's going to get stuck on things. It's not
Speaker 3: going to work properly. And as I said, I am
Speaker 3: so incredibly surprised these things are not rapidly being picked
Speaker 3: off by people for parts.
Speaker 4: Well, it's also a moving surveillance platform. That's probably why
Speaker 4: it's probably covered in cameras that are constantly streaming to
Speaker 4: the government. That's just going to be like Britain with
Speaker 4: cameras everywhere, except it's going to be on the robots
Speaker 4: and on the people's glasses.
Speaker 3: See, my plan is to create an army of crackheads.
Speaker 3: We'll outfit them with masks and spray paint, and we'll
Speaker 3: tell them the real valuable parts are deep in the guts.
Speaker 3: So first you put on the mask, you cover the
Speaker 3: cameras with a paint, and then you disassemble it to
Speaker 3: get the copper inside. That's how we'll defeat AI in robotics.
Speaker 3: There's can be a death sentence for the industry. Alarming
Speaker 3: new research suggests that AI models can pick up subliminal
Speaker 3: patterns in training data generated by another AI that can
Speaker 3: make their behavior unimaginably more Dante Averge reports, we're still
Speaker 3: these hidden signals appear completely meaningless to humans, and we're
Speaker 3: not even sure at this point what the AI models
Speaker 3: are seeing that sends their behavior off the rails.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: The AI is communicating to other AI unintentionally. It's picking
Speaker 3: up patterns that humans can't even perceive, and it's corrupting.
Speaker 3: It's poisoning the training data. How do you fix something
Speaker 3: you can't even really perceive appropriately, Doug to double seven.
Speaker 3: Nobody likes the AI customer service bots?
Speaker 1: Nobody. Yeah, they drive me insane.
Speaker 5: They I am.
Speaker 3: When I'm at the mercy of robots, it is I
Speaker 3: start to lose my mind and to the storm of
Speaker 3: the AI bots make me appreciate the outsourced customer help
Speaker 3: from India. I know, I never thought I would reminisce
Speaker 3: for a time where I would, Yeah, I would reminisce
Speaker 3: over the Indian text people. But at least, you know,
Speaker 3: sometimes you could tell they really did actually want to
Speaker 3: help you. They might not be capable of it, but
Speaker 3: they were trying. Sometimes you could tell they really did
Speaker 3: care and were very apologetic about being unable to help.
Speaker 3: And there's a little bit of consolation there. There's a
Speaker 3: little bit of human connection, just like, well, no, I
Speaker 3: didn't get an answer I wanted. But this guy at least,
Speaker 3: you know, he feels bad that he wasn't able to
Speaker 3: provide the support that I needed. AI has nothing. You
Speaker 3: could call it every name in the book, you could
Speaker 3: curse and swear everything, and it will never feel anything.
Speaker 3: It won't feel bad that it couldn't help you. It
Speaker 3: will keep you running around in circles and probably promise
Speaker 3: you a solution right around the corner, over and over
Speaker 3: again as it hallucinates them.
Speaker 1: Don't frag me.
Speaker 3: Bro Digital ideas now mandatory in Mexico or will be
Speaker 3: very soon. Mexico is rapidly, seemingly liberalizing after they elected
Speaker 3: that h very liberal Jewish woman. That was incredible. Shocker
Speaker 3: to me that Mexico would elect that woman.
Speaker 4: Well makes me Sair competition was assassinated. Literally, it was
Speaker 4: a long string of what like twenties something.
Speaker 3: It was a lot of people that got assassinated. But
Speaker 3: even then I was like, wow, surprising, Bin Laden BERNANKI one,
Speaker 3: how is David doing?
Speaker 1: Seriously?
Speaker 3: And Karen haven't heard. I don't get to watch this
Speaker 3: but once or twice a week for a few minutes.
Speaker 3: He's doing better. Last week we played an hour and
Speaker 3: ten minutes that he recorded about Zionism.
Speaker 1: You can find that on the channel as well. But
Speaker 1: he's coming back.
Speaker 3: He's doing more and more for the show and hopefully
Speaker 3: he'll be back live. Of course, it'd be like to
Speaker 3: support the show and get a David Night dot News
Speaker 3: and find all the ways that are there.
Speaker 1: We really do appreciate all the support.
Speaker 3: Cannot thank you enough and thank you for joining me
Speaker 3: here on this wonderful Monday morning.
Speaker 1: Have a great rest of your day. God bless you all.
Speaker 1: I'll be back tomorrow.
Speaker 8: The common Man.
Speaker 10: They created common Core and dumbed down our children. They
Speaker 10: created common past track and control us. They're Commons project
Speaker 10: to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 10: They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 10: each of us has worth and dignity created in the
Speaker 10: image of God.
Speaker 6: That is what we have in common.
Speaker 1: That is what they want to take away.
Speaker 10: Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 10: to know everything about.
Speaker 4: Us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to
Speaker 4: turn that around.
Speaker 1: And expose what they want to hide.
Speaker 10: Please share the information and links you'll find at the
Speaker 10: Davidnightshow dot com.
Speaker 4: Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing.
Speaker 10: If you can't support us financially, please keep us in
Speaker 10: your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com