WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.799 --> 00:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, whiskey, come and take my pain, the money.

2
00:00:06.879 --> 00:00:08.480
<v Speaker 2>My brain, Oh whiskey.

3
00:00:09.439 --> 00:00:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Don't why think alone when you can drink it all

4
00:00:12.279 --> 00:00:16.399
<v Speaker 3>in with Ricochet's three Whiskey Happy Hour, join your bartenders

5
00:00:16.600 --> 00:00:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Steve Hayward, John You, and the international woman of Mystery, Lucretia.

6
00:00:25.480 --> 00:00:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Where this lap it up?

7
00:00:26.640 --> 00:00:26.679
<v Speaker 4>It?

8
00:00:26.960 --> 00:00:31.160
<v Speaker 2>David? Ain't you easy on the show? Tap got a giving?

9
00:00:31.679 --> 00:00:32.479
<v Speaker 5>Let that whiskey.

10
00:00:33.079 --> 00:00:36.520
<v Speaker 3>We have an emergency three whiskey Happy Hour podcast this

11
00:00:36.560 --> 00:00:40.920
<v Speaker 3>afternoon because well, because I know Lucretia was just thrilled

12
00:00:40.920 --> 00:00:44.640
<v Speaker 3>to the Supreme Court today, marts you and Lucretia thrilled.

13
00:00:46.560 --> 00:00:49.679
<v Speaker 6>But everyone should know that I was actually in ignorant

14
00:00:49.679 --> 00:00:52.880
<v Speaker 6>bliss because I was so busy and have so many things.

15
00:00:52.880 --> 00:00:54.840
<v Speaker 6>I didn't even have a chance to look at uh

16
00:00:55.399 --> 00:00:58.359
<v Speaker 6>at news, even even in boring meetings because I was

17
00:00:58.399 --> 00:01:01.000
<v Speaker 6>too busy fighting. So I didn't know till Steve. I

18
00:01:01.119 --> 00:01:04.439
<v Speaker 6>always take Steve's text no matter what, So I was like,

19
00:01:04.560 --> 00:01:06.400
<v Speaker 6>what what? I don't know what's going on? You had

20
00:01:06.439 --> 00:01:09.400
<v Speaker 6>to ruin my day even more than it always already ruined.

21
00:01:09.439 --> 00:01:11.319
<v Speaker 3>But thanks to well right, But then it's also the

22
00:01:11.400 --> 00:01:13.280
<v Speaker 3>day after the State of the Union address, and by

23
00:01:13.319 --> 00:01:15.799
<v Speaker 3>the time we usually record our weekly episode at the

24
00:01:15.840 --> 00:01:17.560
<v Speaker 3>end of the week, it'll be really old news, so

25
00:01:18.120 --> 00:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, a couple of quick reactions to that, and

26
00:01:20.040 --> 00:01:22.120
<v Speaker 3>then we got the second half of our conversation with

27
00:01:22.200 --> 00:01:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Richard Epstein to get in the cannon out and it's

28
00:01:24.959 --> 00:01:28.239
<v Speaker 3>shorter than the first installment, so listeners, of course, you

29
00:01:28.280 --> 00:01:31.560
<v Speaker 3>know Richard gets in, you know, three books work material

30
00:01:31.640 --> 00:01:32.920
<v Speaker 3>in about ten minutes, as we know.

31
00:01:33.519 --> 00:01:36.120
<v Speaker 6>Well, a shout out to the Golora for a second,

32
00:01:36.120 --> 00:01:39.760
<v Speaker 6>because I didn't get on there before the comments were

33
00:01:39.799 --> 00:01:43.439
<v Speaker 6>shut down. He says he's leaving me. He's leaving me

34
00:01:43.519 --> 00:01:46.840
<v Speaker 6>for Richard, because Richard is a true libertarian, and you

35
00:01:46.879 --> 00:01:51.840
<v Speaker 6>know I'm not. I still love you, David, and I'll

36
00:01:51.879 --> 00:01:54.680
<v Speaker 6>forgive you when you come back groveling on your knees.

37
00:01:55.599 --> 00:01:57.439
<v Speaker 2>He'll be back soon, as my prediction.

38
00:01:57.920 --> 00:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>So listeners, in case you have not heard the news,

39
00:02:00.000 --> 00:02:04.680
<v Speaker 3>it was blissfully leading your life on this ash Wednesday.

40
00:02:05.000 --> 00:02:07.519
<v Speaker 3>Supreme Court today let us down twice.

41
00:02:07.359 --> 00:02:11.599
<v Speaker 2>It seems to me. First, after having granted.

42
00:02:11.159 --> 00:02:15.360
<v Speaker 3>The stay last week, that was Chief Justice Roberts blocking

43
00:02:15.520 --> 00:02:21.319
<v Speaker 3>a district court injunction against Trump withholding payments of two

44
00:02:21.360 --> 00:02:25.719
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars in USAID grants. Today, the Supreme Court ruled

45
00:02:25.759 --> 00:02:29.639
<v Speaker 3>five to four, with Roberts and amy Cony Barrett joining

46
00:02:29.639 --> 00:02:34.639
<v Speaker 3>the three liberals, saying, sorry, the District Court's right, Trump administration,

47
00:02:34.719 --> 00:02:37.000
<v Speaker 3>you will have to pay out that money. Although there's

48
00:02:37.000 --> 00:02:38.080
<v Speaker 3>some wrinkles.

49
00:02:37.639 --> 00:02:41.039
<v Speaker 6>In it, a little not exactly yeah, okay, I know,

50
00:02:41.120 --> 00:02:43.719
<v Speaker 6>you know, I just don't want to get use listeners

51
00:02:43.719 --> 00:02:47.159
<v Speaker 6>from the outset. Basically that they sent it back to

52
00:02:47.240 --> 00:02:50.240
<v Speaker 6>the damned District Court for whatever reason, to sort of

53
00:02:50.240 --> 00:02:52.879
<v Speaker 6>figure out how and when the money should be spent,

54
00:02:53.639 --> 00:02:57.919
<v Speaker 6>you know. And it is not necessarily an indictment of

55
00:02:57.960 --> 00:03:02.000
<v Speaker 6>the entire Doge project of stopping payments. It is payments

56
00:03:02.000 --> 00:03:03.759
<v Speaker 6>for things that have already happened.

57
00:03:04.400 --> 00:03:06.639
<v Speaker 3>Right, So, I mean, the thing is is that the

58
00:03:06.759 --> 00:03:09.599
<v Speaker 3>it's just a very sort of brusque order from the

59
00:03:09.639 --> 00:03:13.120
<v Speaker 3>five justices and a long unsigned that's right, and a

60
00:03:13.199 --> 00:03:16.800
<v Speaker 3>long descent from Alito where he professes to being shocked,

61
00:03:17.159 --> 00:03:20.800
<v Speaker 3>and I agree with him. It's stunned that shocked and stunned,

62
00:03:20.840 --> 00:03:23.560
<v Speaker 3>as they say in the Great Ruttles spoof of the Beatles.

63
00:03:24.719 --> 00:03:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Well, it wasn't clear to me. I mean, it seems

64
00:03:26.479 --> 00:03:27.840
<v Speaker 2>to me that maybe.

65
00:03:27.400 --> 00:03:30.039
<v Speaker 3>There is lurking, and here an argument of this is

66
00:03:30.039 --> 00:03:32.039
<v Speaker 3>a contract that needs to be fulfilled if the work's

67
00:03:32.039 --> 00:03:35.479
<v Speaker 3>already done, in other words, decided on narrow grounds, even

68
00:03:35.520 --> 00:03:37.560
<v Speaker 3>though it may be rotten, like you know, the Fletcher

69
00:03:37.639 --> 00:03:39.439
<v Speaker 3>versus Peck decision way back and when it was that

70
00:03:39.560 --> 00:03:42.560
<v Speaker 3>eighteen oh nine. Right, A contract's a contract even if

71
00:03:42.560 --> 00:03:44.719
<v Speaker 3>it's corrupt. And I guess I can live with that,

72
00:03:44.800 --> 00:03:46.879
<v Speaker 3>But it's not clear that that's what it's on. It's

73
00:03:47.120 --> 00:03:50.280
<v Speaker 3>partly is there. And I think Alito's argument is, does

74
00:03:50.319 --> 00:03:52.400
<v Speaker 3>a district court, even if the district is.

75
00:03:52.360 --> 00:03:53.360
<v Speaker 2>In Washington, d C.

76
00:03:53.639 --> 00:03:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Which would seem to have jurisdiction at least in one sense,

77
00:03:57.560 --> 00:03:59.599
<v Speaker 3>do they have the power to do this? And I

78
00:03:59.680 --> 00:04:02.000
<v Speaker 3>don't know that all lands. But it's still a disappointment.

79
00:04:02.960 --> 00:04:08.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it is a disappointment. But let's I'm gonna be optimistic.

80
00:04:08.919 --> 00:04:11.360
<v Speaker 6>It is ash Wednesday, and I've been awful all day.

81
00:04:11.400 --> 00:04:13.680
<v Speaker 6>I have to go back to confession after my day

82
00:04:13.800 --> 00:04:17.040
<v Speaker 6>to day. But let me be optimistic for just a moment,

83
00:04:17.079 --> 00:04:21.879
<v Speaker 6>which is that tomorrow it goes back for the district

84
00:04:21.920 --> 00:04:24.439
<v Speaker 6>court judge, who's a Biden hack. Of course he is,

85
00:04:25.560 --> 00:04:28.079
<v Speaker 6>you know, I mean appointed by Biden. That's what I

86
00:04:28.120 --> 00:04:30.759
<v Speaker 6>meant to say. I'm not doing very well on my

87
00:04:31.439 --> 00:04:33.519
<v Speaker 6>commitment to being the better person, Steve.

88
00:04:34.600 --> 00:04:38.360
<v Speaker 2>But you're already not.

89
00:04:38.319 --> 00:04:42.240
<v Speaker 6>Even one day. I mean, I churched like four hours ago. Anyway,

90
00:04:43.759 --> 00:04:47.720
<v Speaker 6>the I mean, in many ways, Alito is absolutely right,

91
00:04:47.759 --> 00:04:50.480
<v Speaker 6>and he's speaking to the larger issue. And the larger issue,

92
00:04:50.480 --> 00:04:53.399
<v Speaker 6>of course, is whether a district a single district court

93
00:04:53.480 --> 00:04:58.240
<v Speaker 6>judge has any jurisdiction uh to compel the government of

94
00:04:58.279 --> 00:05:01.240
<v Speaker 6>the United States to pay any thing, you know, whether

95
00:05:01.279 --> 00:05:05.959
<v Speaker 6>it's two billion taxpayer dollars that are, as Steve said,

96
00:05:06.480 --> 00:05:11.240
<v Speaker 6>already contracted for services already rendered. However those horrible those

97
00:05:11.279 --> 00:05:13.920
<v Speaker 6>services are. And if we know anything about USAID, we

98
00:05:13.959 --> 00:05:18.560
<v Speaker 6>know how horrible those services were. But the court, but

99
00:05:18.680 --> 00:05:21.000
<v Speaker 6>the court didn't agree to that. Now, I did see

100
00:05:21.000 --> 00:05:23.000
<v Speaker 6>some commentary, Steve, really quick, I'm going to throw this

101
00:05:23.040 --> 00:05:24.759
<v Speaker 6>at you about people who said it was it it

102
00:05:24.800 --> 00:05:28.920
<v Speaker 6>was a Trump administration being a little bit a little

103
00:05:28.920 --> 00:05:32.639
<v Speaker 6>bit naive or a little bit too hasty in pushing

104
00:05:32.680 --> 00:05:37.040
<v Speaker 6>this issue, because the Supreme Court does, in fact, very

105
00:05:37.160 --> 00:05:41.360
<v Speaker 6>rarely step in on these kinds of things, and you know,

106
00:05:42.040 --> 00:05:45.120
<v Speaker 6>overturn a stay or or give us stay to a

107
00:05:45.160 --> 00:05:47.800
<v Speaker 6>temporary restraining order. That this is the kind of thing

108
00:05:47.839 --> 00:05:50.560
<v Speaker 6>that is usually just played out in the courts first

109
00:05:51.160 --> 00:05:53.560
<v Speaker 6>and yeah, and so there's not a lot of merits

110
00:05:53.600 --> 00:05:56.279
<v Speaker 6>in this case. I'm not even sure if your contract

111
00:05:56.879 --> 00:06:00.759
<v Speaker 6>legal rationale is there. It's not in the unsigned opinion.

112
00:06:00.759 --> 00:06:05.160
<v Speaker 6>Maybe behind the scenes. But nevertheless, we were hoping that

113
00:06:06.439 --> 00:06:09.240
<v Speaker 6>this would be the beginning of the slapdown of these

114
00:06:09.360 --> 00:06:13.040
<v Speaker 6>out of control district judges, Steve, I mean, that's why

115
00:06:13.120 --> 00:06:14.279
<v Speaker 6>you knew I'd be upset.

116
00:06:14.639 --> 00:06:16.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, I just thought you'd be upset at the lineup.

117
00:06:17.000 --> 00:06:19.000
<v Speaker 3>You know that it was Roberts and Barrett letting us

118
00:06:19.000 --> 00:06:19.480
<v Speaker 3>down right.

119
00:06:19.720 --> 00:06:21.600
<v Speaker 6>Used to it now and by the way, we do

120
00:06:21.680 --> 00:06:24.319
<v Speaker 6>not refer to him any longer as Chief Justice Roberts.

121
00:06:25.319 --> 00:06:27.079
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's dread what is it?

122
00:06:27.079 --> 00:06:28.680
<v Speaker 6>It's the dread coward Roberts.

123
00:06:29.920 --> 00:06:30.519
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

124
00:06:32.000 --> 00:06:34.519
<v Speaker 3>And we the sequel to the Princess Bride with that character.

125
00:06:34.560 --> 00:06:40.319
<v Speaker 3>I think, okay, the other case that is what are

126
00:06:40.319 --> 00:06:43.279
<v Speaker 3>you saying, disappointment sign of talk about dread coward.

127
00:06:43.920 --> 00:06:46.040
<v Speaker 2>The Supreme Court ruled today, actually ruled.

128
00:06:46.240 --> 00:06:49.720
<v Speaker 3>What they did was they rejected a petition to hear

129
00:06:49.839 --> 00:06:52.600
<v Speaker 3>a case called Speech First versus Pamela Whitten.

130
00:06:52.680 --> 00:06:54.839
<v Speaker 2>I forget who Pamela Whitten is, but it's.

131
00:06:54.680 --> 00:07:00.560
<v Speaker 3>The case concerning the University of Indiana's Bias Incidents Response Team,

132
00:07:00.600 --> 00:07:02.759
<v Speaker 3>which is very popular in a lot of woke campuses.

133
00:07:02.959 --> 00:07:04.040
<v Speaker 2>And you know what.

134
00:07:04.000 --> 00:07:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Happens is is that, oh, if somebody says something mean,

135
00:07:06.800 --> 00:07:09.759
<v Speaker 3>you know, hate speech or derogatory or something like that,

136
00:07:11.040 --> 00:07:14.480
<v Speaker 3>you can report it anonymously to the Bias Incident Response Team.

137
00:07:14.639 --> 00:07:18.040
<v Speaker 3>That's a bunch of you know, underutilized administrators, I suppose,

138
00:07:18.079 --> 00:07:21.360
<v Speaker 3>who then can contact the offending party and ask them

139
00:07:21.360 --> 00:07:24.160
<v Speaker 3>to come in for a voluntary.

140
00:07:23.480 --> 00:07:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Review of what they've said.

141
00:07:25.079 --> 00:07:28.920
<v Speaker 3>And there's no formal disciplinary process attached to this, but

142
00:07:29.000 --> 00:07:31.959
<v Speaker 3>it's certainly intimidating. In any other context, you would call

143
00:07:32.000 --> 00:07:36.600
<v Speaker 3>this chilling speech. And by rejecting the appeal, they've left

144
00:07:36.639 --> 00:07:39.040
<v Speaker 3>the circuits in place, because I think, if I've got

145
00:07:39.040 --> 00:07:44.160
<v Speaker 3>this right, your lower court opinion rejected the challenge to

146
00:07:44.240 --> 00:07:48.600
<v Speaker 3>these practices by speech. First, I think it's I'm not

147
00:07:48.600 --> 00:07:50.600
<v Speaker 3>sure it's the seventh Circuit or which circuit is, but

148
00:07:50.680 --> 00:07:52.680
<v Speaker 3>it's the circuit that includes Indiana.

149
00:07:52.839 --> 00:07:54.879
<v Speaker 2>While the sixth Circuit next door.

150
00:07:54.680 --> 00:07:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it is, has ruled in fact that bias

151
00:07:57.680 --> 00:08:01.519
<v Speaker 3>Incident Response teams are on the First Amendment. So you

152
00:08:01.560 --> 00:08:04.199
<v Speaker 3>now have two circuits with two different states of the

153
00:08:04.279 --> 00:08:07.759
<v Speaker 3>law regarding First Amendment protections. And ordinarily you'd think the

154
00:08:07.800 --> 00:08:11.839
<v Speaker 3>Supreme Court would have to step in and the Circuit sweat.

155
00:08:11.920 --> 00:08:14.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you're right, Steve, it's not I have to. It's

156
00:08:15.160 --> 00:08:20.000
<v Speaker 6>by their own internal Supreme Court rules. Those are two

157
00:08:20.120 --> 00:08:23.800
<v Speaker 6>of the things that seem to require that they grant

158
00:08:23.920 --> 00:08:26.439
<v Speaker 6>cert And that is again what you said, which is

159
00:08:26.480 --> 00:08:31.040
<v Speaker 6>when a fundamental right is at stake. Now they can

160
00:08:31.079 --> 00:08:33.679
<v Speaker 6>turn those things down because they can often sort of

161
00:08:34.200 --> 00:08:37.080
<v Speaker 6>pont on whether or not a fundamental right is really

162
00:08:37.080 --> 00:08:39.320
<v Speaker 6>involved in it appears to be that might be what

163
00:08:39.360 --> 00:08:43.240
<v Speaker 6>they're doing here. But also when there are in fact

164
00:08:43.639 --> 00:08:47.559
<v Speaker 6>two separate Circuit Court rulings and two separate circuits that

165
00:08:47.639 --> 00:08:50.519
<v Speaker 6>contradict each other, I mean, that's just not that that

166
00:08:50.720 --> 00:08:54.519
<v Speaker 6>makes no sense from the point of view of, you know,

167
00:08:54.559 --> 00:08:59.120
<v Speaker 6>having judicial supremacy decide these issues for us, right, because

168
00:08:59.159 --> 00:09:01.519
<v Speaker 6>if you live in one part of the country that

169
00:09:02.320 --> 00:09:07.679
<v Speaker 6>the Circuit Court decided that bias incidents response teams, I'll

170
00:09:07.679 --> 00:09:09.639
<v Speaker 6>have something to say about that in a moment after

171
00:09:09.960 --> 00:09:17.320
<v Speaker 6>comes back. But are chilling on free speech, then great.

172
00:09:17.480 --> 00:09:19.320
<v Speaker 6>If you were in the part that says they're not,

173
00:09:19.879 --> 00:09:23.200
<v Speaker 6>then you know you're stuck knowing as say a professor

174
00:09:23.279 --> 00:09:26.200
<v Speaker 6>like me who says something that triggers a poor a

175
00:09:26.519 --> 00:09:32.840
<v Speaker 6>poor delicate students delicate sensibilities, which I've done more than

176
00:09:32.879 --> 00:09:37.240
<v Speaker 6>once and then turned into the bias Incident spons team

177
00:09:37.440 --> 00:09:43.480
<v Speaker 6>more than once. Then you you the faculty member, whoever

178
00:09:43.480 --> 00:09:46.000
<v Speaker 6>it might be. Students in classes get turned in by

179
00:09:46.000 --> 00:09:50.840
<v Speaker 6>other students, then you have no recourse where and and

180
00:09:50.960 --> 00:09:53.679
<v Speaker 6>it depends on where you live. And that makes no sense.

181
00:09:54.360 --> 00:09:56.799
<v Speaker 3>Well, you would think this would be solidly footnote for

182
00:09:57.120 --> 00:10:00.960
<v Speaker 3>territory of carolling products, right, a fundamental right that they

183
00:10:00.960 --> 00:10:03.720
<v Speaker 3>have to have heightened or strict scrutiny for it, right,

184
00:10:04.080 --> 00:10:06.440
<v Speaker 3>And they're dodging it on the technicality that well there's

185
00:10:06.440 --> 00:10:09.639
<v Speaker 3>no injury yet, direct injury or something like that, which

186
00:10:09.679 --> 00:10:13.279
<v Speaker 3>seems pretty weak to me, and.

187
00:10:13.279 --> 00:10:15.759
<v Speaker 6>Maybe I haven't seen the facts of the case, Steve.

188
00:10:15.840 --> 00:10:17.799
<v Speaker 6>What I will tell you this is the honest truth.

189
00:10:17.840 --> 00:10:22.200
<v Speaker 6>The first time, the first time that I got a

190
00:10:22.360 --> 00:10:27.200
<v Speaker 6>notice from the incident the bias Incident response team, the

191
00:10:27.440 --> 00:10:32.120
<v Speaker 6>answer back was, well, we're not trying to curb your

192
00:10:32.159 --> 00:10:34.759
<v Speaker 6>free speech or tell you what to teach in your classroom.

193
00:10:34.840 --> 00:10:40.279
<v Speaker 6>What we're suggesting is that when you use analogies that

194
00:10:40.320 --> 00:10:46.519
<v Speaker 6>you that you choose something a little bit more inclusive

195
00:10:46.840 --> 00:10:51.120
<v Speaker 6>and current. Perhaps I think that the actual, the actual

196
00:10:52.080 --> 00:10:57.360
<v Speaker 6>topic that drew this particular incident response inquiry into me

197
00:10:58.279 --> 00:11:01.039
<v Speaker 6>was that I was talking about the state of nature

198
00:11:01.080 --> 00:11:05.360
<v Speaker 6>and trying to explain how you can still be in

199
00:11:05.399 --> 00:11:09.080
<v Speaker 6>the state of nature in within civil society when there's

200
00:11:09.159 --> 00:11:13.279
<v Speaker 6>no you know, ruling force to make sure that you're

201
00:11:13.559 --> 00:11:16.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, one person isn't violating the natural rights of another.

202
00:11:16.159 --> 00:11:20.519
<v Speaker 6>And I talked about Bernie Getts, Bernard Getz, oh yeah,

203
00:11:20.559 --> 00:11:22.759
<v Speaker 6>and you know, being on the subway, and I said,

204
00:11:22.799 --> 00:11:24.159
<v Speaker 6>you know, he was in the state of nature and

205
00:11:24.240 --> 00:11:28.480
<v Speaker 6>a bunch of stupid, stupid criminal thugs came up and

206
00:11:28.480 --> 00:11:30.440
<v Speaker 6>and you know, he had a gun. And I explained

207
00:11:30.480 --> 00:11:33.039
<v Speaker 6>the whole thing, and this was triggering, and maybe I

208
00:11:33.080 --> 00:11:36.440
<v Speaker 6>shouldn't be using those kinds of examples in my class.

209
00:11:37.080 --> 00:11:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I tell you a true story, and you.

210
00:11:38.399 --> 00:11:40.039
<v Speaker 6>Know what I said, I don't need you to tell

211
00:11:40.039 --> 00:11:42.639
<v Speaker 6>me what examples I use. And it's none of your

212
00:11:42.679 --> 00:11:45.679
<v Speaker 6>damn business. And please don't bother calling me on this again.

213
00:11:46.600 --> 00:11:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, I think you told me once you

214
00:11:49.919 --> 00:11:53.799
<v Speaker 3>never had the pleasure of experiencing Harold Rude at Tremont,

215
00:11:53.840 --> 00:11:56.679
<v Speaker 3>You know, the great strategic studies professor who had been

216
00:11:56.679 --> 00:11:59.399
<v Speaker 3>a tank driver for Patent's Third Army in World War Two.

217
00:11:59.879 --> 00:12:02.519
<v Speaker 3>So when he talked about war, and he actually brought

218
00:12:02.519 --> 00:12:04.519
<v Speaker 3>a gun to class once, an old M one rifle,

219
00:12:04.519 --> 00:12:06.759
<v Speaker 3>to pass it around, saying, this is the fundamental reality

220
00:12:06.759 --> 00:12:09.480
<v Speaker 3>of war, things like this, And.

221
00:12:08.799 --> 00:12:11.000
<v Speaker 2>He's talking about, you know, war is violence, et cetera.

222
00:12:11.120 --> 00:12:15.399
<v Speaker 3>And some young lady in the class was sort of

223
00:12:15.399 --> 00:12:18.759
<v Speaker 3>all sentimental and gushy and typically naive and saying, oh,

224
00:12:19.240 --> 00:12:21.360
<v Speaker 3>I just think, you know, we ought to be able

225
00:12:21.399 --> 00:12:24.840
<v Speaker 3>to the usual slop. And he put his foot up

226
00:12:24.879 --> 00:12:26.440
<v Speaker 3>on the front of her desk and leaned over and

227
00:12:26.480 --> 00:12:28.960
<v Speaker 3>he says, well, you can think that if you want it, says,

228
00:12:29.000 --> 00:12:32.840
<v Speaker 3>after all, they're not going to rape me. Can you

229
00:12:32.879 --> 00:12:38.120
<v Speaker 3>imagine he used to like to say shocking things like

230
00:12:38.159 --> 00:12:38.840
<v Speaker 3>that in class.

231
00:12:38.960 --> 00:12:42.279
<v Speaker 6>You know he too, but even I probably wouldn't try

232
00:12:42.279 --> 00:12:43.799
<v Speaker 6>to get away with something quite bad.

233
00:12:45.039 --> 00:12:48.159
<v Speaker 3>Well, his variation, which it might have been the same

234
00:12:48.200 --> 00:12:51.679
<v Speaker 3>young lady, was sometimes young lady, you just have to say,

235
00:12:51.759 --> 00:12:53.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to shoot your ass off to the you know,

236
00:12:54.039 --> 00:12:54.679
<v Speaker 3>to aggressors.

237
00:12:54.720 --> 00:12:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, ye, that was another one he liked to. Okay, yeah.

238
00:12:58.480 --> 00:13:01.759
<v Speaker 6>The other issue on that Steve that we probably should

239
00:13:01.799 --> 00:13:04.720
<v Speaker 6>at least give a tiny bit of attention to is

240
00:13:04.759 --> 00:13:08.279
<v Speaker 6>the idea that the Supreme Court on the same day

241
00:13:08.879 --> 00:13:18.039
<v Speaker 6>decides not to reconcile the differing opinions about a fundamental

242
00:13:18.120 --> 00:13:22.840
<v Speaker 6>right in differing jurisdictions, but has absolutely no difficulty whatsoever

243
00:13:24.080 --> 00:13:28.639
<v Speaker 6>allowing a district court, which, for folks who don't pay

244
00:13:28.720 --> 00:13:31.039
<v Speaker 6>all that much attention to the federal judicial system, you

245
00:13:31.080 --> 00:13:32.840
<v Speaker 6>have the Supreme Court at the top, you have the

246
00:13:32.879 --> 00:13:36.320
<v Speaker 6>appellate or circuit courts, which are appellate courts only, and

247
00:13:36.360 --> 00:13:38.639
<v Speaker 6>then you have the district courts, which are the trial courts.

248
00:13:39.039 --> 00:13:43.200
<v Speaker 6>They are the lowest on the whole ladder, right all

249
00:13:43.279 --> 00:13:45.960
<v Speaker 6>that they don't have appellate powers, et cetera, et cetera.

250
00:13:46.480 --> 00:13:50.600
<v Speaker 6>And there are ninety four districts, quite a few more

251
00:13:50.639 --> 00:13:52.840
<v Speaker 6>than that in terms of how many judges there are

252
00:13:52.879 --> 00:13:57.000
<v Speaker 6>district court judges. They are appointed the same and confirmed

253
00:13:57.440 --> 00:14:01.200
<v Speaker 6>the same way that Supreme Court justices and appellate court

254
00:14:01.240 --> 00:14:04.559
<v Speaker 6>judges are, but they're district judges, so they serve a

255
00:14:04.600 --> 00:14:07.960
<v Speaker 6>district and as Steve pointed out, this one was probably

256
00:14:08.000 --> 00:14:11.519
<v Speaker 6>over the Washington d C. District. But at the same time,

257
00:14:11.639 --> 00:14:15.240
<v Speaker 6>he's a district court judge, and the idea that the

258
00:14:15.399 --> 00:14:18.639
<v Speaker 6>entire policy of the United States government could be decided

259
00:14:18.639 --> 00:14:23.200
<v Speaker 6>by this one, again, Biden Hack, is just appalling. And

260
00:14:23.240 --> 00:14:27.080
<v Speaker 6>this was the opportunity for the Court to say in

261
00:14:27.159 --> 00:14:30.960
<v Speaker 6>this case, as Alito did, we are not going to

262
00:14:31.039 --> 00:14:36.159
<v Speaker 6>allow differing district court opinions about what the federal government

263
00:14:36.200 --> 00:14:39.919
<v Speaker 6>should do based upon what you know, whose ox is

264
00:14:40.039 --> 00:14:43.720
<v Speaker 6>being gored and whether or not they've forum shopped for

265
00:14:43.759 --> 00:14:45.720
<v Speaker 6>the right judge will give us the right. I mean,

266
00:14:45.759 --> 00:14:48.720
<v Speaker 6>they just it's as if they can't think at the

267
00:14:48.720 --> 00:14:50.000
<v Speaker 6>Supreme Court these days.

268
00:14:50.480 --> 00:14:51.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know.

269
00:14:51.200 --> 00:14:53.080
<v Speaker 6>I don't know what else to say about it, Steve.

270
00:14:52.840 --> 00:14:55.519
<v Speaker 3>But well, I mean, I'm sure John if he was

271
00:14:55.519 --> 00:14:58.440
<v Speaker 3>with us, would give us maybe a B minus at

272
00:14:58.480 --> 00:15:00.639
<v Speaker 3>best for not getting quite. I mean, I would think

273
00:15:00.679 --> 00:15:03.759
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't the DC Circuit normally be the right of Pelop's

274
00:15:04.039 --> 00:15:05.120
<v Speaker 3>court to rule on this?

275
00:15:05.279 --> 00:15:07.039
<v Speaker 2>But that maybe takes more time.

276
00:15:07.080 --> 00:15:11.759
<v Speaker 6>I don't know, But remember Roberts did issue the stay

277
00:15:11.799 --> 00:15:14.600
<v Speaker 6>in the first one. This one, I, you know, kind

278
00:15:14.600 --> 00:15:17.960
<v Speaker 6>of came out of nowhere as far as I can tell.

279
00:15:18.799 --> 00:15:22.879
<v Speaker 6>But they refused to grant sucerari, so things will stay

280
00:15:22.919 --> 00:15:24.840
<v Speaker 6>the way they are. Maybe what you said at the

281
00:15:24.919 --> 00:15:27.360
<v Speaker 6>very beginning, Steve, I recall you said that they couldn't

282
00:15:27.399 --> 00:15:30.919
<v Speaker 6>prove harm. Maybe somebody who actually can prove harm because

283
00:15:30.919 --> 00:15:31.279
<v Speaker 6>of it?

284
00:15:31.559 --> 00:15:33.279
<v Speaker 3>Oh, you're think of space versus I was thinking of

285
00:15:33.480 --> 00:15:37.360
<v Speaker 3>the district the USA, do you funding?

286
00:15:37.399 --> 00:15:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're mixing working our apples and oranges here, but.

287
00:15:40.039 --> 00:15:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Let us yeah, I know, to escape John's harsh sugrading Panela.

288
00:15:45.240 --> 00:15:47.879
<v Speaker 6>Wait wait before you go on on, John, he did

289
00:15:47.919 --> 00:15:49.840
<v Speaker 6>actually have something to say. I just haven't had. I

290
00:15:50.559 --> 00:15:54.240
<v Speaker 6>looked up the case after you you alerted me to it,

291
00:15:54.279 --> 00:15:58.639
<v Speaker 6>and what I saw was John on Fox talking about it.

292
00:15:58.759 --> 00:16:01.480
<v Speaker 6>But I've been so busy all day I couldn't stop

293
00:16:01.480 --> 00:16:03.600
<v Speaker 6>and listen to a video because I've just been a meeting,

294
00:16:03.720 --> 00:16:05.559
<v Speaker 6>So I need to go back. John had something to

295
00:16:05.559 --> 00:16:07.360
<v Speaker 6>say about it, and that's why we miss you. John.

296
00:16:07.519 --> 00:16:08.120
<v Speaker 6>Where are you?

297
00:16:08.600 --> 00:16:12.639
<v Speaker 3>Well know, we've been on contact today about all kinds

298
00:16:12.679 --> 00:16:15.840
<v Speaker 3>of bookkeeping stuff, of course, But all right, well let's

299
00:16:15.879 --> 00:16:20.879
<v Speaker 3>move on from that territory, uh, and to something happier,

300
00:16:20.919 --> 00:16:23.279
<v Speaker 3>which is Trump State of the Union speech. I guess

301
00:16:23.320 --> 00:16:25.679
<v Speaker 3>not technically a state of the Union, but it looks.

302
00:16:25.440 --> 00:16:25.919
<v Speaker 2>Like it, so that.

303
00:16:27.600 --> 00:16:29.799
<v Speaker 6>There's an obscure reason for that. You can't give a

304
00:16:29.840 --> 00:16:31.679
<v Speaker 6>state of the Union when you've only been in office

305
00:16:31.720 --> 00:16:32.279
<v Speaker 6>for a month.

306
00:16:32.879 --> 00:16:35.559
<v Speaker 2>Well except you know, we'll wait a minute. Le's stop

307
00:16:35.559 --> 00:16:35.840
<v Speaker 2>on that.

308
00:16:36.279 --> 00:16:40.679
<v Speaker 3>Article two simply says the president shall from time to time,

309
00:16:41.039 --> 00:16:44.879
<v Speaker 3>doesn't say every year give information on the state. It

310
00:16:44.879 --> 00:16:46.440
<v Speaker 3>does not have to be a speech before that. And

311
00:16:46.519 --> 00:16:49.240
<v Speaker 3>for you know, one hundred plus years when the president

312
00:16:49.320 --> 00:16:51.440
<v Speaker 3>sent letters and yeah, they would do it once.

313
00:16:51.360 --> 00:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Again, starting with Jefferson, right, starting with Jeffrey. It sent

314
00:16:54.279 --> 00:16:55.159
<v Speaker 2>an annual message.

315
00:16:55.159 --> 00:16:58.879
<v Speaker 3>And so I don't think that technically speaking, it's I mean,

316
00:16:58.919 --> 00:16:59.679
<v Speaker 3>I think this is fake.

317
00:16:59.799 --> 00:16:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Same.

318
00:17:00.080 --> 00:17:03.080
<v Speaker 3>It's not really a forget all that. The point was

319
00:17:03.360 --> 00:17:06.079
<v Speaker 3>it was I didn't watch it live. I followed things

320
00:17:06.079 --> 00:17:08.319
<v Speaker 3>on Twitter, noticing highlights, and I'm just a joint the

321
00:17:08.319 --> 00:17:11.880
<v Speaker 3>heck out of it, because you know, the Democrats just things,

322
00:17:11.920 --> 00:17:15.599
<v Speaker 3>displayed all their worst behavior and Trump was not relenting

323
00:17:15.640 --> 00:17:17.200
<v Speaker 3>at all, and it was just glorious.

324
00:17:17.480 --> 00:17:20.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, he handled it remarkably well. If you've

325
00:17:20.279 --> 00:17:22.160
<v Speaker 6>ever been and I know you have, Steve. I know

326
00:17:22.240 --> 00:17:26.039
<v Speaker 6>I have been in a crowd h never on television

327
00:17:26.079 --> 00:17:28.160
<v Speaker 6>as a matter of fact, never on live TV to

328
00:17:28.200 --> 00:17:31.880
<v Speaker 6>the whole world practically, but been hackled by somebody or

329
00:17:31.960 --> 00:17:34.200
<v Speaker 6>some you know, more than one somebody in the crowd.

330
00:17:34.519 --> 00:17:37.559
<v Speaker 6>It could be a bit unnerving. And he, you know,

331
00:17:37.599 --> 00:17:41.720
<v Speaker 6>he just you can tell that that guy is completely

332
00:17:42.200 --> 00:17:44.839
<v Speaker 6>at home in his own skin. Yeah, it may be

333
00:17:45.000 --> 00:17:47.480
<v Speaker 6>can at times, but he's at home there.

334
00:17:47.839 --> 00:17:49.559
<v Speaker 2>And you know that.

335
00:17:49.640 --> 00:17:55.119
<v Speaker 6>The here's the big deal. The the I heard that

336
00:17:55.279 --> 00:18:01.119
<v Speaker 6>Alyssa Slotkin, who gave the Democrats rejoinder response whatever it is,

337
00:18:02.400 --> 00:18:06.440
<v Speaker 6>was praised more by conservatives and Republicans than she was

338
00:18:06.480 --> 00:18:08.799
<v Speaker 6>by people in her own party and the left.

339
00:18:08.880 --> 00:18:10.599
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, because if you know our.

340
00:18:10.480 --> 00:18:13.359
<v Speaker 6>Comments about the CIA, this and that anyway, neither here

341
00:18:13.400 --> 00:18:16.759
<v Speaker 6>nor there. So the left has doubled down on their stupidity.

342
00:18:17.160 --> 00:18:23.079
<v Speaker 6>The left has doubled down on their ideological hackery. I

343
00:18:23.079 --> 00:18:24.839
<v Speaker 6>don't know whatever other way to put it. I mean,

344
00:18:25.279 --> 00:18:29.359
<v Speaker 6>if you can't at least smile, you don't have to

345
00:18:29.359 --> 00:18:31.559
<v Speaker 6>get up and cheer. I know that it's a you know,

346
00:18:31.599 --> 00:18:33.519
<v Speaker 6>it's a bit of a political stunt to bring a

347
00:18:33.720 --> 00:18:38.440
<v Speaker 6>fourteen year old boy who's had thirteen brain surgeries up

348
00:18:38.480 --> 00:18:43.039
<v Speaker 6>and you know, make him an honorary Secret Service agent

349
00:18:43.839 --> 00:18:46.519
<v Speaker 6>because he was supposed to only live five months, thirteen

350
00:18:46.599 --> 00:18:49.319
<v Speaker 6>years ago, whatever it was. If you can't at least

351
00:18:49.400 --> 00:18:51.440
<v Speaker 6>smile at that, if you have to sit there looking

352
00:18:51.559 --> 00:18:55.240
<v Speaker 6>grim and sour and dower, you're just a horrible person.

353
00:18:55.440 --> 00:18:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry.

354
00:18:56.480 --> 00:18:59.240
<v Speaker 3>No, they look well all there's stunts, you mean, holding

355
00:18:59.279 --> 00:19:02.480
<v Speaker 3>up these little power board signs and and you know,

356
00:19:02.599 --> 00:19:04.880
<v Speaker 3>walking out at periodic moments.

357
00:19:05.599 --> 00:19:08.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, but did you did see I hope that Tim.

358
00:19:08.440 --> 00:19:11.559
<v Speaker 6>I'm already forgotten his name. It's okay, he's passed on

359
00:19:11.640 --> 00:19:16.160
<v Speaker 6>to another place. But so so he he wasn't al Green,

360
00:19:16.319 --> 00:19:19.759
<v Speaker 6>but he was another congressman from the Houston area in

361
00:19:19.799 --> 00:19:23.640
<v Speaker 6>Texas who had just been elected to fill Sheila Jackson

362
00:19:23.720 --> 00:19:28.240
<v Speaker 6>Lee's seat because she died in office. So he went

363
00:19:28.279 --> 00:19:32.240
<v Speaker 6>to the speech, posted something very derogatory about Trump and

364
00:19:32.279 --> 00:19:34.640
<v Speaker 6>said he's you know, I'm not going to let you

365
00:19:34.759 --> 00:19:39.519
<v Speaker 6>kill our Medicare, Medicaid whatever and as if, as if,

366
00:19:39.599 --> 00:19:42.359
<v Speaker 6>but anyway, and then he went to the hospital. The

367
00:19:42.400 --> 00:19:43.680
<v Speaker 6>hospital sent him home and he died.

368
00:19:44.039 --> 00:19:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, no, it's uh, yeah, there you go.

369
00:19:47.920 --> 00:19:52.720
<v Speaker 6>I don't know that that Trump effect is pretty pretty incredible.

370
00:19:53.240 --> 00:19:55.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, the House is closest to this, and people have

371
00:19:55.319 --> 00:19:57.680
<v Speaker 3>been saying, Sentinel member, it's going to depend on you know,

372
00:19:57.720 --> 00:19:59.880
<v Speaker 3>who's sick or who dies in office, who controls the

373
00:20:00.359 --> 00:20:02.079
<v Speaker 3>so you know there and.

374
00:20:02.079 --> 00:20:06.519
<v Speaker 6>Actually with the three because of that, with the I

375
00:20:06.559 --> 00:20:11.599
<v Speaker 6>have no idea about that district. I imagine they'll.

376
00:20:10.279 --> 00:20:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's a Democratic district.

377
00:20:11.799 --> 00:20:14.559
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, and and and somebody else will come in

378
00:20:14.680 --> 00:20:17.720
<v Speaker 6>like that. But at the same time, for the time being,

379
00:20:18.640 --> 00:20:21.640
<v Speaker 6>the Republicans maintain a little bit bigger of a majority.

380
00:20:21.680 --> 00:20:25.319
<v Speaker 6>And if the three all good, the three Republican districts

381
00:20:25.359 --> 00:20:28.839
<v Speaker 6>that are up because Trump stole those people for his administration,

382
00:20:30.480 --> 00:20:34.839
<v Speaker 6>they will they will have an even larger majority.

383
00:20:35.279 --> 00:20:36.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, well, what's happening.

384
00:20:36.519 --> 00:20:38.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how many listeners know this, but uh,

385
00:20:38.920 --> 00:20:41.359
<v Speaker 3>Trump wants at least Stefanic to be you an ambassador.

386
00:20:41.839 --> 00:20:45.079
<v Speaker 3>Now he has not formally made her nomination because the

387
00:20:45.079 --> 00:20:48.079
<v Speaker 3>New York government, you know Democrats, they are.

388
00:20:47.880 --> 00:20:50.759
<v Speaker 2>Delaying or saying they will delay the special election to

389
00:20:50.759 --> 00:20:52.720
<v Speaker 2>fill her seat on something like September.

390
00:20:53.400 --> 00:20:55.319
<v Speaker 3>And that's just a naked play to try and steal

391
00:20:55.359 --> 00:20:58.359
<v Speaker 3>a seat or you know, drop of Republicans down wanted to.

392
00:20:59.079 --> 00:21:01.880
<v Speaker 2>So Stefanic for now is not resigning.

393
00:21:01.799 --> 00:21:06.000
<v Speaker 3>To go through the confirmation process to be UN ambassador.

394
00:21:06.079 --> 00:21:08.279
<v Speaker 2>And so anyway, and.

395
00:21:08.240 --> 00:21:10.160
<v Speaker 6>You know what, she's more important in the House because

396
00:21:10.200 --> 00:21:13.400
<v Speaker 6>nobody gives a damn about the UN. I think instead

397
00:21:13.440 --> 00:21:17.160
<v Speaker 6>of instead of making a least Stephanic, UN ambassador should

398
00:21:17.160 --> 00:21:19.720
<v Speaker 6>just stop funding the UN and say we're done.

399
00:21:19.960 --> 00:21:22.119
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's that's true, although I would like to be

400
00:21:22.160 --> 00:21:25.480
<v Speaker 3>fun to have our ambassador telling them off again like

401
00:21:25.519 --> 00:21:27.640
<v Speaker 3>the good old days. So that's fine. But yeah, I

402
00:21:28.200 --> 00:21:29.839
<v Speaker 3>think I see your point, and I think I agree.

403
00:21:29.960 --> 00:21:30.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

404
00:21:30.319 --> 00:21:33.359
<v Speaker 6>Do you ever did you ever notice though a kind

405
00:21:33.400 --> 00:21:35.799
<v Speaker 6>of as you would call it, field theory I'm going

406
00:21:35.880 --> 00:21:39.839
<v Speaker 6>to offer here, Steve, for a moment, if I would

407
00:21:39.839 --> 00:21:44.000
<v Speaker 6>have said something like that five years ago, three years ago,

408
00:21:44.400 --> 00:21:46.759
<v Speaker 6>let's say that, you know, we just Trump just needs

409
00:21:47.200 --> 00:21:50.839
<v Speaker 6>whoever needs to stop funding the UN altogether, Yeah, you

410
00:21:50.839 --> 00:21:53.559
<v Speaker 6>would have called me just a little bit crazy because

411
00:21:53.559 --> 00:21:56.039
<v Speaker 6>you couldn't even say that sort of thing out loud.

412
00:21:56.160 --> 00:22:00.960
<v Speaker 6>You could the idea that they could cut the size

413
00:22:00.960 --> 00:22:04.319
<v Speaker 6>of government and you could talk about it, The idea

414
00:22:04.400 --> 00:22:07.240
<v Speaker 6>that you can be in a meeting at a university

415
00:22:07.319 --> 00:22:09.079
<v Speaker 6>and talk about how you have to get rid of

416
00:22:09.160 --> 00:22:12.240
<v Speaker 6>DEI and put all the you know, I did that

417
00:22:12.319 --> 00:22:14.960
<v Speaker 6>again today. Look, guys, you might be able to get

418
00:22:15.000 --> 00:22:19.480
<v Speaker 6>away with some of this sex and sexual identity discrimination

419
00:22:19.720 --> 00:22:22.759
<v Speaker 6>for a little while longer, but you cannot get away

420
00:22:22.799 --> 00:22:27.039
<v Speaker 6>with any of your deia that refers to race, because

421
00:22:27.039 --> 00:22:29.440
<v Speaker 6>the Supreme Court has ruled on that. That's the end

422
00:22:29.519 --> 00:22:32.480
<v Speaker 6>of the story. If you prefer somebody on the basis

423
00:22:32.480 --> 00:22:36.160
<v Speaker 6>of the race, you are a bigot. That's what I said.

424
00:22:36.559 --> 00:22:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh fun, you can.

425
00:22:37.519 --> 00:22:46.240
<v Speaker 6>Imagine I'm so popular. I'm so popular. Not but I

426
00:22:46.279 --> 00:22:48.400
<v Speaker 6>could say it now where I couldn't a year ago.

427
00:22:49.000 --> 00:22:54.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, Well, with that, I think we will draw.

428
00:22:54.039 --> 00:22:57.839
<v Speaker 3>Our introductory part of this emergency podcast. I want to

429
00:22:57.920 --> 00:23:00.799
<v Speaker 3>keep up with the commentary, guys, because we still have

430
00:23:00.960 --> 00:23:06.279
<v Speaker 3>our undeclared, our declared total war against them for dissignmic rib, which,

431
00:23:06.319 --> 00:23:07.960
<v Speaker 3>by the way, the McRib was a clue in the

432
00:23:08.000 --> 00:23:09.920
<v Speaker 3>New York Times crossword puzzle earlier.

433
00:23:09.680 --> 00:23:12.200
<v Speaker 6>This week, which I think, what was the answer, I don't,

434
00:23:12.240 --> 00:23:12.559
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

435
00:23:12.599 --> 00:23:13.160
<v Speaker 2>I got to check.

436
00:23:13.160 --> 00:23:14.960
<v Speaker 3>I heard the secondhand from a I don't do the

437
00:23:15.000 --> 00:23:16.440
<v Speaker 3>New York Times crossword puzzle.

438
00:23:16.519 --> 00:23:18.240
<v Speaker 6>I don't do the New York Times.

439
00:23:18.960 --> 00:23:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I you know, I keep up with a little

440
00:23:21.480 --> 00:23:22.960
<v Speaker 3>of it as opposition research.

441
00:23:23.000 --> 00:23:26.440
<v Speaker 6>Of course, that's why money.

442
00:23:26.680 --> 00:23:29.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I know it's quite sensible. I write it off

443
00:23:29.319 --> 00:23:31.559
<v Speaker 3>of my taxes because I figured it's you know, medical.

444
00:23:31.599 --> 00:23:31.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

445
00:23:32.000 --> 00:23:34.200
<v Speaker 6>I thought maybe you were getting USA I D money

446
00:23:34.200 --> 00:23:36.039
<v Speaker 6>to guide to it. Steve.

447
00:23:36.519 --> 00:23:39.000
<v Speaker 3>No, they keep trying to sell me all their premium

448
00:23:39.000 --> 00:23:41.640
<v Speaker 3>stuff that actually makes the money. The real story of

449
00:23:41.640 --> 00:23:43.920
<v Speaker 3>the New York Times profitability is not the newspaper.

450
00:23:44.000 --> 00:23:45.759
<v Speaker 2>It's the cooking stuff.

451
00:23:45.400 --> 00:23:48.119
<v Speaker 3>And all the other the games and word role now

452
00:23:48.160 --> 00:23:49.680
<v Speaker 3>makes some money and all that stuff.

453
00:23:49.799 --> 00:23:52.039
<v Speaker 6>So same with Wall Street Journal, and they keep trying

454
00:23:52.039 --> 00:23:54.039
<v Speaker 6>to sell me all that stuff too. And I have

455
00:23:54.160 --> 00:23:57.839
<v Speaker 6>the very basic subscription that allows me to keep up

456
00:23:57.839 --> 00:23:59.279
<v Speaker 6>with the crap you guys are reading.

457
00:23:59.359 --> 00:24:02.920
<v Speaker 2>And okay, all right, we'll let you go.

458
00:24:03.000 --> 00:24:05.559
<v Speaker 3>And now we will get onto the second half of

459
00:24:05.599 --> 00:24:06.960
<v Speaker 3>our conversation with Richard.

460
00:24:06.720 --> 00:24:09.759
<v Speaker 2>Epstein, and we'll be back with John, all three of

461
00:24:09.839 --> 00:24:14.640
<v Speaker 2>us full strength over the weekend. So stay tuned so

462
00:24:14.759 --> 00:24:15.319
<v Speaker 2>much winning.

463
00:24:16.519 --> 00:24:22.839
<v Speaker 3>Yes, indeed, Richard, you published a few years ago this

464
00:24:22.960 --> 00:24:26.119
<v Speaker 3>little book called How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution.

465
00:24:26.680 --> 00:24:28.039
<v Speaker 5>That's a big thing for Lucretian.

466
00:24:28.079 --> 00:24:30.680
<v Speaker 7>I we have a particular approach to it that comes

467
00:24:30.720 --> 00:24:31.559
<v Speaker 7>from political.

468
00:24:31.279 --> 00:24:33.880
<v Speaker 5>Philosophy rather than law.

469
00:24:34.400 --> 00:24:38.839
<v Speaker 7>They overlap, and I wonder if you could, I don't know,

470
00:24:38.839 --> 00:24:40.640
<v Speaker 7>maybe why did you just sign and write that book?

471
00:24:40.720 --> 00:24:42.599
<v Speaker 5>And what are your one or two main themes?

472
00:24:43.000 --> 00:24:45.279
<v Speaker 4>Why do I end up writing the book? It's like

473
00:24:45.319 --> 00:24:47.839
<v Speaker 4>everything you look at. It was published by the Cato Institute.

474
00:24:48.559 --> 00:24:49.559
<v Speaker 4>And what happened is.

475
00:24:49.519 --> 00:24:51.480
<v Speaker 5>Did Roger talk you into it? Well?

476
00:24:51.519 --> 00:24:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Roger was a.

477
00:24:52.160 --> 00:24:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Part of it, okay, and he actually had a fairly

478
00:24:54.960 --> 00:24:58.599
<v Speaker 4>substantial hint in the editing of the book. His objective was,

479
00:24:58.839 --> 00:25:00.559
<v Speaker 4>I don't care whether your ride or but I want

480
00:25:00.599 --> 00:25:03.400
<v Speaker 4>you to be clear and I have this tendency to.

481
00:25:03.359 --> 00:25:04.400
<v Speaker 5>Go the other way.

482
00:25:04.759 --> 00:25:06.440
<v Speaker 4>So what happened is I gave one of their Low

483
00:25:06.559 --> 00:25:09.839
<v Speaker 4>Day talks in whatever September, and I wrote a little

484
00:25:09.920 --> 00:25:13.400
<v Speaker 4>lessay on it, and the seamen, Roger and the people

485
00:25:13.400 --> 00:25:18.440
<v Speaker 4>that Cato said, they said that what really goes on

486
00:25:18.559 --> 00:25:21.480
<v Speaker 4>in this particular case is that you have to write

487
00:25:21.480 --> 00:25:25.119
<v Speaker 4>this in a longer and most and more consistent fashion

488
00:25:25.440 --> 00:25:28.519
<v Speaker 4>so it could reach the larger systematic audience. And this,

489
00:25:28.640 --> 00:25:30.960
<v Speaker 4>by the way, was at a very different time from

490
00:25:31.000 --> 00:25:34.440
<v Speaker 4>what we have today. I think the debates on the

491
00:25:34.480 --> 00:25:39.319
<v Speaker 4>aftermath of the nineteen thirty seven revolution and so forth

492
00:25:39.559 --> 00:25:43.319
<v Speaker 4>were much more salient in twenty six when the book

493
00:25:43.359 --> 00:25:48.160
<v Speaker 4>came out than they are today. Because modern constitutionalism has

494
00:25:48.240 --> 00:25:51.079
<v Speaker 4>moved on. The abortion case becomes the new focal point,

495
00:25:51.440 --> 00:25:54.400
<v Speaker 4>and even that is now changed, and the separation of

496
00:25:54.440 --> 00:25:58.039
<v Speaker 4>powers issues and the executive order issues are dominant, and

497
00:25:58.119 --> 00:26:01.440
<v Speaker 4>the e commerce clause issues and the substantive due process

498
00:26:01.480 --> 00:26:04.519
<v Speaker 4>issues that I wrote then are still covered, but in

499
00:26:04.680 --> 00:26:07.160
<v Speaker 4>much less stuff. So why did I write it given

500
00:26:07.200 --> 00:26:09.680
<v Speaker 4>the fact that it was then a live issue, Because

501
00:26:09.759 --> 00:26:13.039
<v Speaker 4>it was a book which essentially wanted to attack the

502
00:26:13.200 --> 00:26:17.559
<v Speaker 4>dominant synthesis of that particular time on these issues. And

503
00:26:17.599 --> 00:26:19.960
<v Speaker 4>so if you go back to nineteen thirty six and

504
00:26:20.359 --> 00:26:23.359
<v Speaker 4>carry it through to about nineteen forty two or forty three,

505
00:26:23.960 --> 00:26:27.279
<v Speaker 4>the dominant literature is a celebratory literature. We had all

506
00:26:27.319 --> 00:26:30.440
<v Speaker 4>these big, bad cases out there that nobody wanted to keep,

507
00:26:30.720 --> 00:26:33.640
<v Speaker 4>and then we had justice accused who bothering was a

508
00:26:33.640 --> 00:26:36.920
<v Speaker 4>progressive Republican, He was not a conservative, and he was

509
00:26:36.960 --> 00:26:39.480
<v Speaker 4>willing to leave the charge. And what we had was

510
00:26:39.519 --> 00:26:42.200
<v Speaker 4>to use the word of red. Remember the switch in

511
00:26:42.279 --> 00:26:45.720
<v Speaker 4>time that saved nine. Thomas Reid wrote that, well, I mean,

512
00:26:46.279 --> 00:26:49.359
<v Speaker 4>whom did it say, Well, you start looking at it,

513
00:26:49.400 --> 00:26:50.880
<v Speaker 4>start at nineteen thirty.

514
00:26:50.640 --> 00:26:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Eight, there was a recession.

515
00:26:53.160 --> 00:26:53.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, right, The.

516
00:26:55.480 --> 00:26:58.079
<v Speaker 4>Book basically dealt with the fact that this thing which

517
00:26:58.119 --> 00:26:59.960
<v Speaker 4>was celebrated was essentially unsound.

518
00:27:00.400 --> 00:27:03.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, it was essentially unsound, but not just because of

519
00:27:03.920 --> 00:27:07.279
<v Speaker 6>the New Deal. It was essentially unsound because what rewrote

520
00:27:07.279 --> 00:27:11.119
<v Speaker 6>the Constitution was a different progressive view about human nature,

521
00:27:11.160 --> 00:27:16.240
<v Speaker 6>the perfectibility of human nature, the denial of human equality,

522
00:27:16.400 --> 00:27:20.319
<v Speaker 6>the denial of human rights, natural rights, as we find

523
00:27:20.359 --> 00:27:23.519
<v Speaker 6>in the Declaration of Independence. You have Woodrow Wilson's you

524
00:27:23.759 --> 00:27:25.839
<v Speaker 6>making fun of all of that, or saying, we don't

525
00:27:26.039 --> 00:27:27.960
<v Speaker 6>wish at the very least we shouldn't look at the

526
00:27:28.000 --> 00:27:31.079
<v Speaker 6>preamble of the Constitution, you know, on and on. But

527
00:27:31.480 --> 00:27:36.680
<v Speaker 6>what it did was it destroyed the entire basis for

528
00:27:36.759 --> 00:27:41.759
<v Speaker 6>the constitutional system, and then allowed by nineteen thirty seven,

529
00:27:41.799 --> 00:27:45.559
<v Speaker 6>after progressive ideas had become I think more dominant, it

530
00:27:45.640 --> 00:27:49.119
<v Speaker 6>allowed the Supreme Court then, as you point out, to

531
00:27:49.200 --> 00:27:53.200
<v Speaker 6>destroy the Constitution by destroying separation of powers, by destroying

532
00:27:53.200 --> 00:27:57.480
<v Speaker 6>the idea that all of the powers that when they

533
00:27:57.559 --> 00:27:59.640
<v Speaker 6>end up in the same hands it's the very definition

534
00:27:59.680 --> 00:28:02.640
<v Speaker 6>of tears by destroying the idea that men are not

535
00:28:02.799 --> 00:28:08.240
<v Speaker 6>angels and that we could trust some ridiculous elite expert

536
00:28:08.319 --> 00:28:10.960
<v Speaker 6>class to govern us and they would never bring politics

537
00:28:11.000 --> 00:28:14.279
<v Speaker 6>into the into the fray. I mean, all of that

538
00:28:14.319 --> 00:28:15.160
<v Speaker 6>destroyed experts.

539
00:28:15.160 --> 00:28:16.279
<v Speaker 5>Do you have a lot of that here?

540
00:28:16.400 --> 00:28:20.440
<v Speaker 4>I should have asked that, yes, I mean, if you go,

541
00:28:21.400 --> 00:28:24.160
<v Speaker 4>if you go in effect, yes, I mean if you

542
00:28:24.319 --> 00:28:27.839
<v Speaker 4>go and actually check the book. The first fifty two

543
00:28:27.880 --> 00:28:30.920
<v Speaker 4>pages of it are talking about exactly the issues that

544
00:28:31.000 --> 00:28:33.960
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned, and then at the page fifty two I

545
00:28:34.000 --> 00:28:37.720
<v Speaker 4>talk about federalism revisit and individual rights revisit it. So

546
00:28:37.920 --> 00:28:40.839
<v Speaker 4>the only reason why the book had credibility is that

547
00:28:40.880 --> 00:28:43.960
<v Speaker 4>what you started to talk about in our conversation is

548
00:28:43.960 --> 00:28:46.160
<v Speaker 4>what I devoted the first chapters of the book to.

549
00:28:46.799 --> 00:28:48.880
<v Speaker 4>And it's one of the themes that I think everybody

550
00:28:48.880 --> 00:28:51.519
<v Speaker 4>has to remember is that when you start dealing with

551
00:28:51.599 --> 00:28:55.480
<v Speaker 4>political philosophy in the Grands tradition, you do not want

552
00:28:55.519 --> 00:28:57.799
<v Speaker 4>to start with this, that or the other little statute.

553
00:28:58.000 --> 00:28:59.519
<v Speaker 4>What you want to do is to start with the

554
00:28:59.599 --> 00:29:01.880
<v Speaker 4>question the nature of man and how society has come

555
00:29:01.920 --> 00:29:03.000
<v Speaker 4>to get formed.

556
00:29:04.519 --> 00:29:06.559
<v Speaker 5>Language Keep going, I mean.

557
00:29:06.519 --> 00:29:09.799
<v Speaker 4>And there's no disagreement between us. The first thing you

558
00:29:09.920 --> 00:29:13.839
<v Speaker 4>have to note is that given scarcity, self interest is

559
00:29:13.839 --> 00:29:17.799
<v Speaker 4>a necessary carl it in all societies, but it's greater

560
00:29:17.880 --> 00:29:20.880
<v Speaker 4>in abundance in some people than in others. And so

561
00:29:21.039 --> 00:29:24.519
<v Speaker 4>what happens is you have construct confined generosity the human

562
00:29:24.680 --> 00:29:27.680
<v Speaker 4>term as a weak offset that can actually take place

563
00:29:27.960 --> 00:29:31.640
<v Speaker 4>in some cases. So you start looking at these individuals

564
00:29:31.680 --> 00:29:35.200
<v Speaker 4>and what you realize is that man is a social animal.

565
00:29:35.279 --> 00:29:38.599
<v Speaker 4>Is through with ninety percent of the population various degrees

566
00:29:38.640 --> 00:29:41.160
<v Speaker 4>of cooperation. Then there's this other bunch out there, and

567
00:29:41.160 --> 00:29:43.960
<v Speaker 4>they're not so cooperative. And the great challenge to any

568
00:29:44.000 --> 00:29:46.440
<v Speaker 4>situation as to how to give those people some respect

569
00:29:46.480 --> 00:29:49.200
<v Speaker 4>for their rights when their major intention is to destroy

570
00:29:49.279 --> 00:29:52.960
<v Speaker 4>the conventional arrangements that other people have put together amongst themselves.

571
00:29:53.200 --> 00:29:56.640
<v Speaker 4>And so what a constitution is about is trying to

572
00:29:56.680 --> 00:29:59.039
<v Speaker 4>see how you do this. And one of the most

573
00:29:59.079 --> 00:30:02.920
<v Speaker 4>profound instance that you have in the Federal's ten by

574
00:30:03.000 --> 00:30:06.559
<v Speaker 4>Madison is enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm.

575
00:30:07.039 --> 00:30:10.039
<v Speaker 4>Now why is that statement important? Well, first of all,

576
00:30:10.119 --> 00:30:12.480
<v Speaker 4>the help means you have only one And if you

577
00:30:12.519 --> 00:30:16.279
<v Speaker 4>go back to the American debates over the formation, a

578
00:30:16.359 --> 00:30:20.119
<v Speaker 4>single chief executive was sought to be an essential reform,

579
00:30:20.440 --> 00:30:24.039
<v Speaker 4>and the Articles of Confederation had nobody with executive power. Well,

580
00:30:24.079 --> 00:30:26.039
<v Speaker 4>this one person is going to do all the right things,

581
00:30:26.039 --> 00:30:28.559
<v Speaker 4>except when he does all the wrong things. So you

582
00:30:28.640 --> 00:30:30.759
<v Speaker 4>do is you have to give him discretion to act

583
00:30:30.799 --> 00:30:33.440
<v Speaker 4>with dispatch, and then try to surround it with enough

584
00:30:33.799 --> 00:30:38.680
<v Speaker 4>institutional constraints and so that what happens more generally is

585
00:30:38.720 --> 00:30:43.400
<v Speaker 4>that he cannot essentially be essentially allowed to work when

586
00:30:43.400 --> 00:30:45.960
<v Speaker 4>he's going to steer you into rough waters. These institutional

587
00:30:46.000 --> 00:30:48.759
<v Speaker 4>structures will try to stop that. I'll give you an

588
00:30:48.799 --> 00:30:51.400
<v Speaker 4>earlier institution, which is not about the federals and stuff.

589
00:30:51.599 --> 00:30:53.680
<v Speaker 4>Within a year or two after I wrote that book,

590
00:30:53.920 --> 00:30:56.640
<v Speaker 4>I got involved with the whole question of what George

591
00:30:56.680 --> 00:30:59.599
<v Speaker 4>Bush could do with respect to the various international treaties,

592
00:31:00.319 --> 00:31:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Geneva treaties and all the rest of it. And I

593
00:31:03.480 --> 00:31:06.839
<v Speaker 4>wrote a long article not a law about saying, look,

594
00:31:06.880 --> 00:31:09.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the one thing to understand about this is

595
00:31:09.599 --> 00:31:13.039
<v Speaker 4>you have to understand the structure of the causes governing

596
00:31:13.119 --> 00:31:16.480
<v Speaker 4>the operation of the military in the United States. I said, well,

597
00:31:16.519 --> 00:31:19.079
<v Speaker 4>first of all, you have to understand how important they were,

598
00:31:19.319 --> 00:31:21.480
<v Speaker 4>because they had at least three or four clauses that

599
00:31:21.559 --> 00:31:24.279
<v Speaker 4>were dealing with wars amongst the several states and the

600
00:31:24.279 --> 00:31:27.799
<v Speaker 4>conflicts that existed amongst them, and the Republican form of

601
00:31:27.880 --> 00:31:32.079
<v Speaker 4>government clause under the Guarantee clause was in effect a

602
00:31:32.200 --> 00:31:34.279
<v Speaker 4>course to the United States trying to figure out can

603
00:31:34.319 --> 00:31:37.519
<v Speaker 4>you intervene to prevent wars between the states? Lutheran Bordon

604
00:31:37.640 --> 00:31:41.000
<v Speaker 4>was such a case which they had, and then how

605
00:31:41.000 --> 00:31:43.440
<v Speaker 4>do they do the power? Well, they had the army

606
00:31:43.440 --> 00:31:46.319
<v Speaker 4>and the navy, no air force obviously, but when it

607
00:31:46.359 --> 00:31:49.480
<v Speaker 4>came to the army, there was also the militia, and

608
00:31:49.559 --> 00:31:53.920
<v Speaker 4>the militia was a very complicated organization. The Constitution has

609
00:31:53.960 --> 00:31:56.519
<v Speaker 4>a provision which says the militias are in charge of

610
00:31:56.559 --> 00:31:59.960
<v Speaker 4>the state generals. And what happens is there's a compromise

611
00:32:00.200 --> 00:32:04.160
<v Speaker 4>standardization point. You have to train your militia in accordance

612
00:32:04.240 --> 00:32:08.319
<v Speaker 4>with the discipline, that is, the standards of proof that

613
00:32:08.440 --> 00:32:11.839
<v Speaker 4>are required to everybody. So they could become interoperable. And

614
00:32:11.920 --> 00:32:15.160
<v Speaker 4>so they put that in there, and essentially then you

615
00:32:15.319 --> 00:32:18.480
<v Speaker 4>remained under state control with that limitation until you were

616
00:32:18.480 --> 00:32:20.960
<v Speaker 4>called up into the active service of the United States.

617
00:32:21.200 --> 00:32:23.759
<v Speaker 4>But the president could not do that. It had to

618
00:32:23.839 --> 00:32:26.640
<v Speaker 4>be authorized by Congress. There's another check in balance on

619
00:32:26.680 --> 00:32:28.920
<v Speaker 4>the operation of the system. And then it could be

620
00:32:28.960 --> 00:32:31.480
<v Speaker 4>only for limited purposes. And at that time there was

621
00:32:31.480 --> 00:32:34.960
<v Speaker 4>a guy named Purpet who wanted to withhold troops from

622
00:32:35.039 --> 00:32:37.519
<v Speaker 4>the federal government because they didn't want them to go overseas.

623
00:32:37.519 --> 00:32:40.240
<v Speaker 4>This is in the nineteen fifty and could you get

624
00:32:40.279 --> 00:32:42.759
<v Speaker 4>them overseas under the militia clause? And well, you have

625
00:32:42.799 --> 00:32:44.599
<v Speaker 4>to look hard and say, is this an invasion, is

626
00:32:44.640 --> 00:32:48.880
<v Speaker 4>this an insurrection anything like that? Or separation case? No,

627
00:32:49.440 --> 00:32:51.799
<v Speaker 4>it was a foreign case. So how did they handle that?

628
00:32:51.839 --> 00:32:53.640
<v Speaker 4>They changed the constitution.

629
00:32:53.160 --> 00:32:53.880
<v Speaker 2>They rewrote it.

630
00:32:55.079 --> 00:32:58.960
<v Speaker 4>What they did is in nineteen seventeen, a man named

631
00:32:59.039 --> 00:33:02.839
<v Speaker 4>Pitney was a Supreme Court justice and a selective Act

632
00:33:03.359 --> 00:33:08.640
<v Speaker 4>selective service cases, and he said, one is military service

633
00:33:08.680 --> 00:33:11.680
<v Speaker 4>is not involuntary service too. And then the other thing

634
00:33:11.759 --> 00:33:14.200
<v Speaker 4>that he said is that when you look at the

635
00:33:14.200 --> 00:33:18.359
<v Speaker 4>way this is organized, it turns out it is permissible

636
00:33:18.519 --> 00:33:22.079
<v Speaker 4>for the president to draft the militia into federal service

637
00:33:22.720 --> 00:33:24.759
<v Speaker 4>one and all into the army. Now, if you look

638
00:33:24.759 --> 00:33:27.200
<v Speaker 4>at the structure of the clause, the militia clause is

639
00:33:27.240 --> 00:33:29.920
<v Speaker 4>supposed to be a safeguard against the federal government. If

640
00:33:29.960 --> 00:33:31.960
<v Speaker 4>you could draft them into the army, it's all over.

641
00:33:32.279 --> 00:33:34.440
<v Speaker 4>But nobody worried about that. They were worried about the

642
00:33:34.480 --> 00:33:37.839
<v Speaker 4>funding the Russian the European War, and so Pittney took

643
00:33:37.839 --> 00:33:40.039
<v Speaker 4>it pumped and he said this is a political question,

644
00:33:40.119 --> 00:33:42.039
<v Speaker 4>when it cluded was not. It was a legal question,

645
00:33:42.359 --> 00:33:44.720
<v Speaker 4>and he decided it wrong. So it happens is the

646
00:33:44.720 --> 00:33:47.599
<v Speaker 4>war is over, and you still have to reconstitute the militia.

647
00:33:47.960 --> 00:33:50.640
<v Speaker 4>And so in nineteen thirty two they passed the statute

648
00:33:50.799 --> 00:33:54.400
<v Speaker 4>which created dual citizenship in the army and in the militia.

649
00:33:54.960 --> 00:33:56.200
<v Speaker 5>And what happened is you.

650
00:33:56.200 --> 00:33:58.960
<v Speaker 4>Went overseas under the army clause, and you got funded

651
00:33:58.960 --> 00:34:02.079
<v Speaker 4>for local operations under the militia clause. And that carried

652
00:34:02.119 --> 00:34:04.720
<v Speaker 4>all the way through until the Purpose case when I

653
00:34:04.799 --> 00:34:08.239
<v Speaker 4>worked on the cases that came afterwards, in which the

654
00:34:08.599 --> 00:34:11.440
<v Speaker 4>die hards for the militia clause wanted to say that

655
00:34:11.480 --> 00:34:14.480
<v Speaker 4>you could send people overseas under the militia clause, and

656
00:34:14.519 --> 00:34:17.599
<v Speaker 4>the court basically struck that thing down, and rightly so.

657
00:34:17.599 --> 00:34:20.000
<v Speaker 4>So I mean, this is a class negostration of rewriting

658
00:34:20.039 --> 00:34:23.920
<v Speaker 4>the constitution. But they're rewriting in a way to correct

659
00:34:23.920 --> 00:34:27.760
<v Speaker 4>from a grievous constitutional mistake which was made under political necessity.

660
00:34:28.000 --> 00:34:29.239
<v Speaker 5>One gets another one.

661
00:34:29.400 --> 00:34:30.559
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I went back you up a minute.

662
00:34:30.559 --> 00:34:32.239
<v Speaker 5>You said somebody a minute ago. You also said in

663
00:34:32.280 --> 00:34:35.320
<v Speaker 5>class that I want to make.

664
00:34:35.199 --> 00:34:37.639
<v Speaker 3>A proposition about you said that you know something along

665
00:34:37.679 --> 00:34:39.280
<v Speaker 3>the lines you said you ninety percent.

666
00:34:39.000 --> 00:34:40.880
<v Speaker 5>Of people are reasonable and you know, behave in a

667
00:34:40.920 --> 00:34:41.639
<v Speaker 5>sensible banner.

668
00:34:41.960 --> 00:34:46.119
<v Speaker 3>And to restate it, really often doing is making law

669
00:34:46.239 --> 00:34:48.480
<v Speaker 3>and enforcing law for the ten percent, we might say,

670
00:34:48.519 --> 00:34:49.960
<v Speaker 3>in today's terms, are anti social.

671
00:34:50.039 --> 00:34:50.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

672
00:34:50.920 --> 00:34:54.679
<v Speaker 3>My proposition is this is very broad, and you may

673
00:34:54.719 --> 00:34:56.280
<v Speaker 3>or be not resisted. It seems to me that an

674
00:34:56.320 --> 00:34:58.840
<v Speaker 3>awful lot of the agenda of the progressive left today

675
00:34:59.440 --> 00:35:02.920
<v Speaker 3>is to right laws in favor of that ten I mean,

676
00:35:02.960 --> 00:35:05.000
<v Speaker 3>one example would be these court cases you've had over

677
00:35:05.000 --> 00:35:07.880
<v Speaker 3>the years saying public libraries can't exclude homeless people.

678
00:35:08.000 --> 00:35:10.320
<v Speaker 5>Yes, right, Is that too broad a statement?

679
00:35:10.559 --> 00:35:13.599
<v Speaker 4>No, it turns out you're in a very sensitive topic.

680
00:35:14.039 --> 00:35:16.880
<v Speaker 4>It's not public libraries. It's that there was a decision

681
00:35:16.920 --> 00:35:20.000
<v Speaker 4>which said that, so long as they're not atquate shelters,

682
00:35:20.079 --> 00:35:22.920
<v Speaker 4>public people have the right to sleep on public streets.

683
00:35:23.079 --> 00:35:26.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, Supreme Court, the state courts that actually said the library.

684
00:35:27.119 --> 00:35:30.159
<v Speaker 5>I guess you. An example of the law is in

685
00:35:30.239 --> 00:35:31.280
<v Speaker 5>favor of the answer.

686
00:35:31.320 --> 00:35:33.920
<v Speaker 4>There is no question, and that's because they're isolated and

687
00:35:34.000 --> 00:35:36.880
<v Speaker 4>discreet minority. But it's the wrong one. What you want

688
00:35:36.920 --> 00:35:39.039
<v Speaker 4>to say, in effect, is that public streets are for

689
00:35:39.159 --> 00:35:41.559
<v Speaker 4>public walking, coming and going. They're not for camping.

690
00:35:41.599 --> 00:35:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

691
00:35:42.440 --> 00:35:44.199
<v Speaker 4>And so once you do it on the streets, it

692
00:35:44.239 --> 00:35:46.239
<v Speaker 4>explains a lot of the success of people like a

693
00:35:46.360 --> 00:35:49.599
<v Speaker 4>mass turning up ten camps on campuses, because there's a

694
00:35:49.639 --> 00:35:52.960
<v Speaker 4>presumptive First Amendment right to violate the traffic law. And

695
00:35:53.119 --> 00:35:55.360
<v Speaker 4>here you have to understand what the First Amendment is

696
00:35:55.400 --> 00:35:59.880
<v Speaker 4>about it in a very very simplistic way. Is what

697
00:35:59.920 --> 00:36:02.840
<v Speaker 4>the First Amendment does is it protects the kinds of

698
00:36:02.840 --> 00:36:05.639
<v Speaker 4>freedoms that you had at common law to speak into protest.

699
00:36:06.000 --> 00:36:06.800
<v Speaker 2>What the First.

700
00:36:06.519 --> 00:36:09.320
<v Speaker 4>Amendment does not do is expand the class of freedoms

701
00:36:09.480 --> 00:36:12.880
<v Speaker 4>to include antisocial acts that trenched on anybody else. And

702
00:36:12.960 --> 00:36:15.119
<v Speaker 4>so this first came to me by listening to a

703
00:36:15.199 --> 00:36:19.480
<v Speaker 4>joke on Archie comics, and I mean it seriously. And

704
00:36:19.559 --> 00:36:24.079
<v Speaker 4>so Archie comes to Jughead or jug Heads comes to Archie,

705
00:36:24.079 --> 00:36:27.159
<v Speaker 4>and jug hares a notable nuture and he says to Archie,

706
00:36:27.960 --> 00:36:31.360
<v Speaker 4>do you believe in freedom of speech? And Archie says sure,

707
00:36:31.840 --> 00:36:33.719
<v Speaker 4>and then jug Head picks up the phone and says,

708
00:36:33.760 --> 00:36:35.920
<v Speaker 4>then you won't mind me using your phone for a

709
00:36:35.960 --> 00:36:39.239
<v Speaker 4>long distance call. Now, why is that funny? Is ther

710
00:36:39.280 --> 00:36:41.159
<v Speaker 4>question you asked because you were laughing, both of you.

711
00:36:41.719 --> 00:36:44.679
<v Speaker 4>The reason it's funny is that he assumed that the

712
00:36:44.840 --> 00:36:46.639
<v Speaker 4>right to speech meant he had the right to come

713
00:36:46.679 --> 00:36:49.320
<v Speaker 4>into you somebody else's property, and that it was all

714
00:36:49.360 --> 00:36:51.599
<v Speaker 4>a piece with being able to use his own phone.

715
00:36:52.119 --> 00:36:54.960
<v Speaker 4>But the whole point of the First Amendment is to

716
00:36:54.960 --> 00:36:56.800
<v Speaker 4>say that you could use your own form, not that

717
00:36:56.840 --> 00:37:00.159
<v Speaker 4>you could expropriate somebody else's. So freedom of speech is

718
00:37:00.199 --> 00:37:03.079
<v Speaker 4>subject to the same limitations of freedom of action. You

719
00:37:03.159 --> 00:37:05.440
<v Speaker 4>cannot use it in a way which trenches on somebody

720
00:37:05.440 --> 00:37:08.840
<v Speaker 4>else's liberty. So you can't do a freedom of speech stuff.

721
00:37:08.840 --> 00:37:10.960
<v Speaker 4>If you say all freeze is free, you have to

722
00:37:11.039 --> 00:37:13.679
<v Speaker 4>use an analysis of the term freedom, which is going

723
00:37:13.760 --> 00:37:15.639
<v Speaker 4>to talk about all the limitations on the use of

724
00:37:15.679 --> 00:37:19.639
<v Speaker 4>force and fraud. So the First Amendment has to now include, well,

725
00:37:19.679 --> 00:37:21.239
<v Speaker 4>how do you deal with fraud, how do you deal

726
00:37:21.280 --> 00:37:24.559
<v Speaker 4>with decoration, how do you deal with confidential agreements, how

727
00:37:24.639 --> 00:37:26.599
<v Speaker 4>do you deal with libel, how to deal with trademarks

728
00:37:26.639 --> 00:37:30.599
<v Speaker 4>and so forth, trespass of course that need pruniad cake

729
00:37:31.199 --> 00:37:34.639
<v Speaker 4>all of these. Yes, but you don't have a right

730
00:37:34.679 --> 00:37:37.239
<v Speaker 4>to be because you want to speak there and getting

731
00:37:37.280 --> 00:37:41.280
<v Speaker 4>this out is requires an enormous amount of stuff. And

732
00:37:41.320 --> 00:37:44.000
<v Speaker 4>what you have to say about the progressives is that

733
00:37:44.039 --> 00:37:47.159
<v Speaker 4>in general they're willing to compromise on all of those

734
00:37:47.280 --> 00:37:49.719
<v Speaker 4>rights and every other contact. So it's not going to

735
00:37:49.719 --> 00:37:52.000
<v Speaker 4>be any big deal for them to take the same

736
00:37:52.079 --> 00:37:55.440
<v Speaker 4>thing amount speech. And this book was written before that

737
00:37:55.480 --> 00:37:59.039
<v Speaker 4>issue became much more salient. But within a year, you know,

738
00:37:59.079 --> 00:38:01.320
<v Speaker 4>I had the presidential power stuff that I was writing

739
00:38:01.320 --> 00:38:02.360
<v Speaker 4>about and so forth.

740
00:38:02.760 --> 00:38:05.239
<v Speaker 2>So the book was focused.

741
00:38:04.760 --> 00:38:07.480
<v Speaker 4>On the two things at the fine nineteen thirty seven.

742
00:38:07.880 --> 00:38:10.239
<v Speaker 4>But the theory is much more general than that, as

743
00:38:10.360 --> 00:38:12.039
<v Speaker 4>is evidence by the fact that the first half of

744
00:38:12.039 --> 00:38:15.599
<v Speaker 4>the book deals exactly what Lucrecia was trying to talk about.

745
00:38:16.119 --> 00:38:17.679
<v Speaker 7>All right, well, let me let me say that for

746
00:38:17.679 --> 00:38:19.840
<v Speaker 7>a listener that you want to ask, let me say

747
00:38:19.840 --> 00:38:24.159
<v Speaker 7>this for listeners, for those of you listening who may

748
00:38:24.639 --> 00:38:28.960
<v Speaker 7>I think correctly Richard, say that your book on taking

749
00:38:29.000 --> 00:38:33.239
<v Speaker 7>is the classic local constitution is a heavy reach for you,

750
00:38:33.320 --> 00:38:35.480
<v Speaker 7>an intelligent lay reader. This books one hundred and thirty

751
00:38:35.519 --> 00:38:38.440
<v Speaker 7>seven pages of texts, so it's short, compact.

752
00:38:39.679 --> 00:38:41.920
<v Speaker 5>Maybe give Roger Blonzo.

753
00:38:41.599 --> 00:38:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Credit for editing you some.

754
00:38:43.199 --> 00:38:46.000
<v Speaker 7>That's a lot Okay, very readable book, and I recommend

755
00:38:46.079 --> 00:38:48.760
<v Speaker 7>to our listeners how progressive rewrote the Constitution?

756
00:38:48.880 --> 00:38:49.480
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, Richard.

757
00:38:49.519 --> 00:38:51.159
<v Speaker 4>But by the way, I want to mention one other things.

758
00:38:51.280 --> 00:38:53.239
<v Speaker 4>Sure they even changed the title on me.

759
00:38:53.440 --> 00:38:54.320
<v Speaker 5>Oh, what did you want to do?

760
00:38:54.480 --> 00:38:57.599
<v Speaker 4>I have some dreadful title, of course, And what they

761
00:38:57.639 --> 00:38:59.800
<v Speaker 4>did is they said, there's no punch in your title,

762
00:39:00.440 --> 00:39:04.599
<v Speaker 4>and the rewrote essentially now defines the rebellion that you're attacking.

763
00:39:05.079 --> 00:39:08.719
<v Speaker 4>And so I sort of wrote the rise of Progressivism

764
00:39:08.800 --> 00:39:11.679
<v Speaker 4>in the United States, which is much too much weak

765
00:39:12.039 --> 00:39:14.199
<v Speaker 4>relative to the thing they get. And so one of

766
00:39:14.239 --> 00:39:17.119
<v Speaker 4>the things that all authors have to understand is that

767
00:39:17.159 --> 00:39:20.559
<v Speaker 4>in many cases, when it comes to title, an editor

768
00:39:20.599 --> 00:39:22.880
<v Speaker 4>knows better than you do. And what you have to

769
00:39:22.880 --> 00:39:26.239
<v Speaker 4>do is to always take their serious assumption. And the

770
00:39:26.239 --> 00:39:29.199
<v Speaker 4>presumption generally is, if the editor knows the subject, their

771
00:39:29.239 --> 00:39:31.840
<v Speaker 4>title is better than your title. Why is that because

772
00:39:31.840 --> 00:39:34.239
<v Speaker 4>they're a reader and they're going to distill the central point.

773
00:39:34.599 --> 00:39:37.000
<v Speaker 4>You're an author, and you're going to lose sight of it,

774
00:39:37.119 --> 00:39:38.719
<v Speaker 4>and so you have to go with the guy who

775
00:39:38.840 --> 00:39:41.719
<v Speaker 4>runs the punch. And so I'm always a believer in

776
00:39:41.880 --> 00:39:45.360
<v Speaker 4>administrative difference by me the editors of my work.

777
00:39:46.039 --> 00:39:49.639
<v Speaker 7>Well, the classic example of that was Robert Putnam's famous article.

778
00:39:49.360 --> 00:39:52.000
<v Speaker 5>That book Bullying Alone, which an editor thought of.

779
00:39:52.119 --> 00:39:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Right, because I think, you know, being an academic, his

780
00:39:54.440 --> 00:39:57.039
<v Speaker 3>original title is probably something like, you know, the Klein

781
00:39:57.119 --> 00:39:58.440
<v Speaker 3>of Civic capital.

782
00:39:58.320 --> 00:39:59.920
<v Speaker 5>In America, Evidence from bold.

783
00:40:00.760 --> 00:40:02.760
<v Speaker 7>Yes, that never would have been noticed by George will

784
00:40:02.880 --> 00:40:04.280
<v Speaker 7>or President Clinton if.

785
00:40:04.199 --> 00:40:05.199
<v Speaker 5>You have the title.

786
00:40:05.440 --> 00:40:09.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, this was also true of Charles Murray's book. Well,

787
00:40:09.400 --> 00:40:12.079
<v Speaker 4>it has some terrible title and some editor to put

788
00:40:12.119 --> 00:40:15.000
<v Speaker 4>the phrase losing ground on the title, and it became

789
00:40:15.039 --> 00:40:17.119
<v Speaker 4>a best seller the Takings title.

790
00:40:17.599 --> 00:40:18.440
<v Speaker 2>But that was mine.

791
00:40:18.679 --> 00:40:20.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but the second half of the title is a

792
00:40:20.920 --> 00:40:24.800
<v Speaker 4>mouthful private property in the power of eminent domain. I'm

793
00:40:24.840 --> 00:40:26.719
<v Speaker 4>not sure I would do it. The first part is

794
00:40:26.800 --> 00:40:30.199
<v Speaker 4>strong as a title. Taking is one word. The second

795
00:40:30.280 --> 00:40:33.599
<v Speaker 4>part is to namby Pamby. But I can't tell my publishers. Now,

796
00:40:33.639 --> 00:40:36.320
<v Speaker 4>of course it's forty since the book has come out, right,

797
00:40:36.719 --> 00:40:38.159
<v Speaker 4>Richard much my question?

798
00:40:40.360 --> 00:40:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Well, the only thing left to do now is

799
00:40:42.840 --> 00:40:47.320
<v Speaker 3>to remind everybody always drink your whiskey neat and don't

800
00:40:47.320 --> 00:40:50.760
<v Speaker 3>forget to milk the Margaret Brennan dividend. See you all

801
00:40:50.800 --> 00:40:51.800
<v Speaker 3>over the weekend, everybody.

802
00:40:51.880 --> 00:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Bye bye, ricoson

803
00:42:01.679 --> 00:42:02.679
<v Speaker 2>Join the conversation.
