Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: It's Friday, the tenth of January, year of Our Lord,
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five. Well, today we're going to take a
Speaker 2: look with some follow up information about the fire, about
Speaker 2: the agenda. This is it's uninhabitable now, say many of
Speaker 2: the people who are looking at this. So I think
Speaker 2: we know where this is headed. As we have seen
Speaker 2: so many other ways. Can't rebuild. Sorry, we've got new regulations,
Speaker 2: new codes, and this area is just too disastrous. We
Speaker 2: can't do anything to help you. We're going to begin though,
Speaker 2: by talking about politics, the money behind it, the agenda
Speaker 2: behind this. Trump is getting a record amount for the inauguration,
Speaker 2: and you've got a lot of companies that are contributing.
Speaker 2: At the Pfizer level. That's a big tech who's caught
Speaker 2: on pretty quickly to this game. But we'll also take
Speaker 2: a look at what the impact of the tariffs are
Speaker 2: going to be and the alleged one hundred executive orders
Speaker 2: that Trump is going to be doing right away and
Speaker 2: just had a conference telling Republicans about that. We'll be
Speaker 2: right back. Well, we had a lot of well, pretty
Speaker 2: much all of the surviving presidents were at the funeral
Speaker 2: for Jimmy Carter. He had Bush, you had Trump and Obama.
Speaker 2: The Clinton's were both there. Actually, Michelle Obama did not
Speaker 2: show up. How about that? Even Milania came and then
Speaker 2: Mike Pence was seated right behind Trump and Lala Harris
Speaker 2: is right in front of him, And it was kind
Speaker 2: of interesting to watch how chummy Trump and Obama got.
Speaker 2: Look at this, He's talking and really talking his zero
Speaker 2: off and Obama really likes it. This is like when
Speaker 2: he was talking to Jeffrey Epstein. I mean, it's it's
Speaker 2: that kind of level, like this is a whispering his
Speaker 2: day and the other guy laughing like that, except now
Speaker 2: is Obama instead of Jeffrey Epstein. Yeah. It's just one
Speaker 2: big club, isn't it. As a matter of fact, bablin
Speaker 2: Bee said, mourners at Jimmy Carter's funeral placed the flowers
Speaker 2: on Biden by mistake. It's hard. It's hard to tell anymore.
Speaker 2: But Trump previewed his one hundred executive orders. We don't
Speaker 2: have too much information about it, but he got the
Speaker 2: Republicans in Congress together. Actually, the Senate, Senate Republicans. On Wednesday,
Speaker 2: Axios broke the story. They said senators were given previews
Speaker 2: and some of what they were told would be one
Speaker 2: hundred executive orders. Is that a good way to govern?
Speaker 2: You know, we look at the governing style of Trump,
Speaker 2: for example, bullying, insults everywhere, even abroad. This is one
Speaker 2: of the things that's making Jimmy Carter look good, even
Speaker 2: though he was a horrible president. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: you know, I talked about it was his Playboy interview
Speaker 2: that nearly sun him. Maybe it did. I don't know
Speaker 2: if it was the first time he ran or the
Speaker 2: second time he ran, but it was that interview where
Speaker 2: he said, hey, Jesus said, if you look at a
Speaker 2: woman to lust after, you've committed adultery in your heart.
Speaker 2: I've done that many times. So I'm not going to
Speaker 2: blame somebody who leaves their wife and goes and lives
Speaker 2: in adultery. And this is the kind of mindset because
Speaker 2: Jesus also said, if you get angry with somebody, you've
Speaker 2: committed murder in your heart. So this is the kind
Speaker 2: of attitude that says, well, hey, you know, I really
Speaker 2: don't like this school. So I could guess I should
Speaker 2: just go ahead and get a gun and shoot the
Speaker 2: place up, because I've already committed murder in my heart,
Speaker 2: so let's just do it for real, right. Well, what
Speaker 2: kind of a Sunday school teacher is he? But this
Speaker 2: last week we also had another death. We had Peter
Speaker 2: Yarrow of Peter, Paul and Mary who died. He sexually
Speaker 2: assaulted it was found guilty and admitted it a fourteen
Speaker 2: year old girl. Yeah, that kind of destroys the music
Speaker 2: for you, doesn't Yeah, As a matter of fact, as
Speaker 2: a kid, I didn't realize that Puff the Magic Dragon
Speaker 2: was about pot but kind of made sense when I
Speaker 2: realized that this guy was a child molesting pedophile, you know,
Speaker 2: Puff the Magic Dragon. Little Johnny Paper loved that dragon Puff.
Speaker 2: But who knows. I didn't look it up to see
Speaker 2: if they admitted that or if that was just what
Speaker 2: people thought. But I don't know it was. I was
Speaker 2: on the young side at that point in time, so
Speaker 2: I don't write me if I got it wrong. Maybe
Speaker 2: I got it wrong. Maybe a lot of people have
Speaker 2: said that. Maybe they said, no, we didn't have that
Speaker 2: in mind at all. But anyway, it was Jimmy Carter
Speaker 2: who gave him a full pardon. Jimmy Carter pardoned pedophiles,
Speaker 2: he pardoned adulters in a Sunday school, and the rest
Speaker 2: of this stuff. But you know, it makes Jimmy Carter
Speaker 2: look great when Donald Trump starts to bully and insult everybody.
Speaker 2: That's the way he operates. That's the way he operates
Speaker 2: within the Republican Party. That's why he operates in America.
Speaker 2: That's the way he operates with the media. And you've
Speaker 2: got fire this organization that protects the free speech on universities,
Speaker 2: and they are going to defend this Iowa polster that
Speaker 2: Trump wants to sue because she got a poll wrong.
Speaker 2: Now she was, you know, pretty wrong, and it was
Speaker 2: an outlier, but you know, there are a lot of
Speaker 2: people who were wrong, especially in twenty sixteen. Pretty much
Speaker 2: all the pollsters were surprised. Nate silver was had a
Speaker 2: pretty good reputation. He got everything wrong in twenty and sixteen.
Speaker 2: And so you know it's a but don't you dare
Speaker 2: get anything wrong. As a matter of fact, Kaylee and
Speaker 2: Annie who used to be was it his press secretary
Speaker 2: or something? When she's on Fox, she read poll results wrong,
Speaker 2: read them and that was down by a couple of
Speaker 2: points in what it really was, and he had a fit,
Speaker 2: a temper tenttrum on social media about this person who
Speaker 2: used to work for me, and she just apologized profusely.
Speaker 2: But he operates by bullying, and he has set a
Speaker 2: lot of very dangerous precedents in his first term in
Speaker 2: terms of executive orders, you know, whether it's the Second
Speaker 2: Amendment or whether it's the pandemic lockdown stuff and Operation
Speaker 2: Warp Speed, and the way that he got that through
Speaker 2: in terms of bribing everybody in the world, from government
Speaker 2: officials and governors and public health officials all the way
Speaker 2: down to bribing people to essentially go along with a
Speaker 2: diagnosis and don't challenge it, and will give you money
Speaker 2: for the funeral if your loved one died in a
Speaker 2: hospital with a diagnosis of COVID, so that they could
Speaker 2: get a twenty percent bonus on everything they did in
Speaker 2: a cash payment of thirteen thousand dollars just for saying
Speaker 2: that they had COVID, and then the people who are
Speaker 2: the relatives of the person who died and got something
Speaker 2: like four thousand dollars. Of course, the hospitals could also
Speaker 2: get a thirty nine thousand dollars bonus to put you
Speaker 2: on a ventilator which in most cases kill people about
Speaker 2: ninety percent at a time. That would kill people. He
Speaker 2: paid hospitals to kill people. Don't ever forget that this hero. Yeah,
Speaker 2: make amnesia great again. That's what maga is really about. Oh,
Speaker 2: I forget about all that. Who cares that? So four
Speaker 2: years ago, said Timpoole and Laura Lumer, Yeah, we got
Speaker 2: your number two anyway, So now he's got one hundred
Speaker 2: executive orders. Now conservatives will be freaking out, and rightfully.
Speaker 2: So if this is going to be done by Biden
Speaker 2: or by La La Harris or by Obama, do you
Speaker 2: really want to be ruled by presidential executive order? Are
Speaker 2: we going to elect a new dictator every four years?
Speaker 2: Because Congress is too busy having dog and pony show
Speaker 2: trials to do anything, and they kick the stuff over
Speaker 2: to the bureaucracy. They're perfectly fine to let the president
Speaker 2: do it as well, because all the bureaucracy is under
Speaker 2: the president. So senators and given previews of some of
Speaker 2: what they were told would be one hundred executive orders.
Speaker 2: So two sources to Axios, Stephen Miller dove in. How
Speaker 2: they plan to use executive power to address the border
Speaker 2: and immigration starting day one. Unclear if all will be
Speaker 2: technical executive orders or more broadly executive actions taken by
Speaker 2: Trump or by federal agencies distinction without a difference. Reinstating
Speaker 2: Title forty two. This was the pandemic era public health policy.
Speaker 2: You know, the only time that he closed the border
Speaker 2: in his first four years was for COVID. They deported
Speaker 2: people for COVID, didn't deport people for anything else. There
Speaker 2: are millions of Title forty two expulsions from early in
Speaker 2: COVID pandemic until Biden ended the policy in twenty twenty three.
Speaker 2: But his secret weapon for mass deportation, according to the
Speaker 2: Gold Report, is going to be Everify. It's really sad
Speaker 2: to see that the Gold Report is championing this. Look
Speaker 2: at the scroll that up and let people see what
Speaker 2: that article looks like. The full graphic there. Scroll down
Speaker 2: a little bit further, which says this organization does Oh,
Speaker 2: it doesn't display the same way on yours online. It
Speaker 2: looks like it's a sign that somebody puts up, and
Speaker 2: it looks like burger king sign. It's got like a
Speaker 2: rounded burger at the top and at the bottom, and
Speaker 2: the meat of it is that says this organization participates
Speaker 2: in need verify. So it's a I guess it is
Speaker 2: something that they have that they have put out for
Speaker 2: people to put up to threaten people that you should
Speaker 2: have a we should all have a digital ID that
Speaker 2: will be verified by Homeland Security before we can get
Speaker 2: a job. Is that the kind of society that you
Speaker 2: want to live in? And it's the Republicans who are
Speaker 2: pushing this, just like it's the Republicans who are pushing
Speaker 2: online digital ID because hey, we can't. Parents are just
Speaker 2: helpless to protect their kids. You know, We've got to
Speaker 2: give them phones and computers and twenty four to seven
Speaker 2: access to it. So government's going to have to do
Speaker 2: the parenting here. And that means that all of us
Speaker 2: are going to have to have digital ID to get
Speaker 2: on the internet eventually because of that, or digital ID
Speaker 2: in order to travel, which they want to put in
Speaker 2: or have a job, on and on on. The only
Speaker 2: thing that you should have, only thing that government should
Speaker 2: be iding you for. In my opinion, if you're going
Speaker 2: to vote, if you don't want to vote, should be
Speaker 2: no digital IDs or any other IDs either you want
Speaker 2: to participate in that system, fine, have somebody IDU. But
Speaker 2: voting is not mandatory yet. It is in a lot
Speaker 2: of totalitarian societies, and that's where we're headed. So maybe
Speaker 2: they will make voting mandatory. That'd be the only time
Speaker 2: that they would put an id in with it. But
Speaker 2: you think this is going to work, You think this
Speaker 2: is going to stop illegal immigration? Absolutely not. First of all,
Speaker 2: if everybody that was coming here was coming here because
Speaker 2: they wanted a job, and that's not the case as
Speaker 2: we know. If everybody was coming here because they wanted
Speaker 2: a job, it's not going to stop the black market
Speaker 2: in jobs, for example, anymore than fifty plus years. What
Speaker 2: is it now, fifty four? I think was it nineteen
Speaker 2: seventy one? I think when they did the war on drugs.
Speaker 2: We're coming up to fifty four years of war on drugs.
Speaker 2: Has it stopped drugs? Has it stopped drug use? That's
Speaker 2: not the only black market that's out there. You're going
Speaker 2: to have a black market in jobs, and this is
Speaker 2: not going to stop it. What it will do is
Speaker 2: it will harass people kind of like you're talking about
Speaker 2: the war on drugs. When you go in and get
Speaker 2: I remember having to go in and get some cough
Speaker 2: medicine or something like that. Well they really, hell, yeah,
Speaker 2: what are you going to do with this cough medicine?
Speaker 2: Can you hear me talk? But I think I needed
Speaker 2: for a cough and a call. No, they want to
Speaker 2: scrutinize you in all these different we get your ID
Speaker 2: and report it to the DEA and all the rest
Speaker 2: of this kind of stuff. It's just going to harass
Speaker 2: people that are legitimately using things. And this is going
Speaker 2: to harass Americans who want a job, And it's not
Speaker 2: going to affect somebody who wants to get a job illegally.
Speaker 2: And it certainly isn't going to affect the people who
Speaker 2: want to come here because they're involved in criminal enterprises
Speaker 2: or because they want to be involved in the criminal
Speaker 2: enterprise of welfare. Uh, you know, why are we giving
Speaker 2: it again? I always talk about the welfare magnet. But
Speaker 2: listen to this. This is from the Center for Immigration Studies.
Speaker 2: If you aren't for e verify, you aren't serious about
Speaker 2: controlling immigration. They said they consider a universal everifying. It's
Speaker 2: not universal, it's mandated mandated. That's what they're talking about.
Speaker 2: Mandated everifying to be a basic tenant. They said, for
Speaker 2: any robust immigration policy, we can't control the border without it.
Speaker 2: You must weaken the jobs magnet attracting people. No, you
Speaker 2: got to weaken the welfare magnet. Nowhere in any of
Speaker 2: this is welfare a part of the equation. Look if
Speaker 2: everybody was coming for jobs, and I understand it's the
Speaker 2: same situation that we have with the H one B
Speaker 2: visa thing. You know, there's there's an aspect of that
Speaker 2: that is predatory by the cour operations and the other
Speaker 2: individuals who are coming here. But this is not even
Speaker 2: the welfare magnet is the thing that they could stop.
Speaker 2: Why are they continuing to pay people to come here
Speaker 2: on the one hand, and then telling us that if
Speaker 2: we want a job, so they pay for owners to
Speaker 2: come here and live on welfare, and they get superior
Speaker 2: welfare to Americans who are on welfare. And then they
Speaker 2: tell Americans that if you want a job, well you're
Speaker 2: going to have to get a digital idea and get
Speaker 2: permission from Homeland Security. I noticed this when we started
Speaker 2: a business. Everybody talking about how welfare is right, welfare
Speaker 2: is a right. Hurt it all the time, and then
Speaker 2: it's like, oh, you want to start a business, better
Speaker 2: get a privileged license and said, oh, okay, so if
Speaker 2: I want to work, if I want to start a business,
Speaker 2: I got to get governments permission, a privileged license. They
Speaker 2: pay for it too. But you know, welfare is a right,
Speaker 2: and so here they say, well, we got to stop this.
Speaker 2: We've got this job's magnet does bring people in. Well,
Speaker 2: that's the H one B visa thing, and that's the
Speaker 2: big corporations as well. That's a different story than this.
Speaker 2: He verifies a federal service created twenty eight years ago
Speaker 2: employers can use to confirm employees eligibility to work in
Speaker 2: the US through the Department of Homeland Security. And then
Speaker 2: they try to legitimize it by saying, well, he goes
Speaker 2: back to Reagan's nineteen eighty six amnesty law. Well, I
Speaker 2: don't know, but I think nineteen eighty six was further
Speaker 2: back than twenty eight years Let's say, let's do the math. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I think that's right. It was thirty nine years ago,
Speaker 2: not twenty eight years ago. And we didn't have a
Speaker 2: Homeland Security when Reagan was there. And what happened with
Speaker 2: the amnesty law. They said, well, we're going to give
Speaker 2: citizenship to the people who were here, and fewer than
Speaker 2: half of them even wanted it. They didn't want liberty,
Speaker 2: they don't want to be American citizens. They just want
Speaker 2: what they can get financially. So they say restoring honors.
Speaker 2: This is this article. It truly is amazing. I was surprised.
Speaker 2: This is the gold Report. Restoring America's honor and independence
Speaker 2: requires freeing her from millions of non violent illegal immigrants
Speaker 2: who have lived here for years within our borders and
Speaker 2: violation of the law. And it means that you should
Speaker 2: have to cower and prove who you are to the government.
Speaker 2: I tell you, my mom didn't even have a birth certificate.
Speaker 2: I've told this story before. She went in to get
Speaker 2: her marriage license. It's as if you should have to
Speaker 2: get a license to get married. Why do we even
Speaker 2: allow the government. The government doesn't know what marriage is.
Speaker 2: They've proven that all the way up to the Supreme Court.
Speaker 2: So why would we let them define it? Why would
Speaker 2: you let them license it. They should have no jurisdiction
Speaker 2: in that whatsoever. That's between you and your spouse, and
Speaker 2: God get them out of it. Anyway, she went in
Speaker 2: to get her marriage license, and they wanted to have
Speaker 2: a birth certificate, and she said, and so that's why
Speaker 2: she took her dad in with her, and he said,
Speaker 2: my grandfather, and he said she was born at home
Speaker 2: and she and the bureaucrat said, well, how can I
Speaker 2: know that, he said, because I just told you. You're
Speaker 2: calling me a liar. Now she backed down. You know,
Speaker 2: one hundred years ago, the bureaucracy has gotten a lot
Speaker 2: more bold in the last century, it hasn't it. So
Speaker 2: I'm seventy five percent of illegal migrant population in the
Speaker 2: United States is in the labor force, and eve ver
Speaker 2: if I can fix that. Okay, let's think about that.
Speaker 2: That means that twenty five percent of the illegal population
Speaker 2: is not in the labor force. They're on welfare. So
Speaker 2: why don't you get rid of twenty five percent just
Speaker 2: like that by telling them go home. We're not going
Speaker 2: to pay for you anymore, and we're not going to
Speaker 2: give you superior benefits to Americans who are on the
Speaker 2: welfare system either. I don't support the welfare system. I
Speaker 2: don't support the welfare state in any way, shape or form.
Speaker 2: But if you're going to have it, it's amazing to have.
Speaker 2: What an outrage it is that you would give this
Speaker 2: as the Cloward and pivot stuff we talk about all
Speaker 2: the time, But anybody can see it. You don't need
Speaker 2: a couple of Democrat economists to spell it out for you.
Speaker 2: You can see what an outrage it is. Twenty five
Speaker 2: percent of them don't have a job totally on welfare,
Speaker 2: and of the other seventy five percent, how many of
Speaker 2: them are also on welfare. It doesn't mean just because
Speaker 2: they're taking the job that they're not getting welfare or
Speaker 2: government subsidies of some sort. Fix the welfare magnet. That's
Speaker 2: another thing. If somebody, if you're going to have a
Speaker 2: welfare state and people are going to be on welfare state,
Speaker 2: you know the people who are going to do that,
Speaker 2: it's I think it's perfectly legitimate to id them up
Speaker 2: one side and down the other. But you know, this
Speaker 2: is all about enslaving us with a digital ID. For
Speaker 2: his part, Trump was soft on everify, says this artic
Speaker 2: during his first term because he thought that it was
Speaker 2: too onerous for employers. That's not entirely wrong. Plenty of
Speaker 2: companies fall for fake employee documents that would meet everify
Speaker 2: his requirements. WARRENS. Ken Kuchinelli, who served as Trump's Director
Speaker 2: of US Citizenship and Immigration Services. Fixing that would require
Speaker 2: an additional layer of scrutiny from both companies and homeliness
Speaker 2: and security officials. So did those employers get penalties if
Speaker 2: somebody used a fake employee document to get a job
Speaker 2: with him? And again, what about You know Trump is
Speaker 2: all about the employers. Does he care about treating us
Speaker 2: like slaves and numbering us like inventory? No, that's okay.
Speaker 2: Just what's it going to do to the employers because
Speaker 2: there's the one. They're the ones I guess who give
Speaker 2: him money? It was Trump's twenty twenty four primary opponent,
Speaker 2: Ron DeSantis. Here we go, here's Ron DeSantis again. You know,
Speaker 2: his censorship laws, his hate speech laws, his mandatory everify laws.
Speaker 2: That's why I could never get behind him. And he's
Speaker 2: been such a weak, limited hangout on all this vaccine stuff. Again,
Speaker 2: it's more than anybody else has done. I've talked about
Speaker 2: that as well. But you know, when he says, well,
Speaker 2: we're gonna Ladipoe says it's got all this garbage in
Speaker 2: a DNA garbage and other things like that, So we
Speaker 2: need to look at that. But I'm going to send
Speaker 2: it over to a grand jury to make this determination.
Speaker 2: It's like, hey, pal, you're the governor. You talk about
Speaker 2: passing the buck over here, right, That's what that was about.
Speaker 2: And it's just you know, he's using them as a beard.
Speaker 2: He's still not going to do anything about it. Everify
Speaker 2: was part of DeSantis's own legislative Dockett setting the tone
Speaker 2: for national Republican immigration agenda in the future, as he
Speaker 2: did with censorship for Israel and hate crimes persecution. Poll
Speaker 2: after poll shows unprecedented support for sealing the border. That's
Speaker 2: really scary, and not that I want an open border,
Speaker 2: but again, there are ways things that could be done,
Speaker 2: and they've driven everybody into panic and fear mode. Nothing
Speaker 2: good is going to come out of this. Instead, what
Speaker 2: people are going to be doing is cheerleading. As you
Speaker 2: see this article. This is a conservative outlet, very pro
Speaker 2: Trump now, very pro Orwellian surveillance, police state. So this
Speaker 2: is where we're headed. You panic people about a problem
Speaker 2: and you go for the globalist solution. Brian shall Hovey.
Speaker 2: Trump prepares his second war against the American people by
Speaker 2: invoking the emergency powers to destroy the economy through tariffs.
Speaker 2: The economic side of this his first presidency, he invoked
Speaker 2: the Prep Act to release trillions of dollars to fund
Speaker 2: the largest military campaign in US history, the War against
Speaker 2: the Unseen Enemy, Operation Warp Speed, and that it was actually,
Speaker 2: as I've said, I agree with Brian, I said at
Speaker 2: many times myself, there's a war against the American people.
Speaker 2: He founded and released a bioweapon, a global war, not
Speaker 2: just in America. And of course it was a war
Speaker 2: against the businesses and jobs that were non essential because
Speaker 2: they were not part of the big box retailers whose
Speaker 2: stock is on Wall Street. Giving billions of dollars to
Speaker 2: pharmaceutical companies to rush untested vaccines that resulted in millions
Speaker 2: of Americans being killed, injured, and crippled for life. We
Speaker 2: still don't have the numbers because the program is still
Speaker 2: going and there's not any Republicans or Democrats who want
Speaker 2: to stop it, none of them who want to tell
Speaker 2: the truth because they got blood on their hands. It's
Speaker 2: going to take a generation of war for that stuff
Speaker 2: to come out, but the truth will eventually come out.
Speaker 2: Many small businesses were destroyed as a result of the
Speaker 2: economy was temporarily saved by total from a total collapse
Speaker 2: with the infusion of trillions of dollars with the Cares Act.
Speaker 2: And again there was three of these episodes. Two of
Speaker 2: them happened under Trump in that one year, and then
Speaker 2: Biden did another one, and that set us on a
Speaker 2: completely different trajectory of bankruptcy. Nationally, Trump is preparing to
Speaker 2: declare a national Economic emergency now to provide legal justification
Speaker 2: to implement across the board tariffs on goods imported into
Speaker 2: the United States. He's perhaps going to be doing this
Speaker 2: by executive order. Congress is so absolutely and totally useless,
Speaker 2: isn't it. Trump is considering a national Economic Emergency decoration
Speaker 2: to allow for a new tariff program. Trump is considering
Speaker 2: the emergency to provide legal justification for a large swath
Speaker 2: of universal tariffs on allies and adversaries. Four sources familiar
Speaker 2: with this told CNN the declaration would allow Trump to
Speaker 2: construct a new tariff program by using the International Economic
Speaker 2: Emergency Powers Act known as the AEPA i EEPA, which
Speaker 2: unilatterally authorizes a president to manage imports during a national emergency.
Speaker 2: So again, if he you know, do we have any
Speaker 2: economic emergency going on right now? Did we have a
Speaker 2: health emergency that was going on when he declared an
Speaker 2: emergency in twenty twenty. Well, no, yeah, you don't have
Speaker 2: to have an emergency. Did Trudeau need to have a
Speaker 2: real emergency when he declared use the invoked the Emergency
Speaker 2: Act that had only been invoked by his father. Nobody
Speaker 2: else had done it. No, it wasn't an actual emergency.
Speaker 2: People were peacefully protesting his authoritarian and detalitarian and illegal
Speaker 2: actions that he openly said were in violation of the Charter.
Speaker 2: He didn't care, but he declared an emergency. It's interesting
Speaker 2: how much alike they are. Trump, one of the sources noted,
Speaker 2: has a fondness for this law since it's grant's wide
Speaker 2: ranging jurisdiction, or how tariffs are implemented without strict requirements
Speaker 2: to prove the tariffs are needed on a national security ground,
Speaker 2: so as to say, again, it was Trudeau who said, well,
Speaker 2: this is violation of national security because I am the
Speaker 2: nation and I'm not feeling very secure when all these
Speaker 2: people come here. They're not happy with what I'm doing.
Speaker 2: And you know, when you look at fondness I played
Speaker 2: in that mashup that are put together, Trudeau saying, you know, well,
Speaker 2: apart from Canada. He was asked, apart from Canada, what
Speaker 2: nation do you most admire. Well, I like the Chinese
Speaker 2: communists because they can just do whatever they want. They
Speaker 2: just dictate this or that, and that allows them to
Speaker 2: protect the environment, you know, like by building two coal
Speaker 2: power plants per week. The whole thing is such a fraud,
Speaker 2: such a fraud by their own measures as a fraud.
Speaker 2: But yeah, he liked that. And Trump loves executive orders too.
Speaker 2: Trump and Trudeau love executive orders. Trump and Trudeau love emergencies.
Speaker 2: I've said for the longest time, we're supposed to believe
Speaker 2: that they're polar opposites of each other. And Trudeau was
Speaker 2: awful and so is Trump, and they're doing the same thing.
Speaker 2: It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter, because they're all serving
Speaker 2: the globalist agenda, the World Economic Forum agenda, the UN agenda,
Speaker 2: the climate agenda, all these all of these global things,
Speaker 2: and of course, you know the digital ID stuff that's
Speaker 2: part of the agenda as well. Like dictators, he's also
Speaker 2: talking about taking new territory everywhere as well. He needs
Speaker 2: that living space at Libastrom or whatever it was. You
Speaker 2: know that Hitler talked about going into Australia. We need
Speaker 2: to have some room to stretch out. You know, we're
Speaker 2: gonna we're gonna go into Greenland or whatever. I really,
Speaker 2: you know, And that's the whole thing about Canada. Uh,
Speaker 2: there's absolutely no way that Trump is going to invade Canada.
Speaker 2: There's absolutely no way that they're going to voluntarily join,
Speaker 2: and there's no way that we want them to join
Speaker 2: because even in the most conservative areas like Alberta, look
Speaker 2: at what they did, the politicians did there. I know
Speaker 2: the people there don't support that. But you know, Canada
Speaker 2: is probably to the left of California, not on the map,
Speaker 2: but politically you know, yeah, it'd be out in the
Speaker 2: ocean if they were. But the uh uh, you know again,
Speaker 2: why is he doing that? I think that is to
Speaker 2: to strike people away from this campaign to take Greenland.
Speaker 2: I think you might use military force against Panama. I
Speaker 2: wouldn't put it past him. I don't support that at all.
Speaker 2: I didn't support it when George hw Bush did it either. Anyway,
Speaker 2: all of us talk though about taking territory. Wall Street
Speaker 2: and others myself included, says Brainshaw Hovey that Health Impact
Speaker 2: News did not believe that Trump would be crazy enough
Speaker 2: to actually do something like this, to willingly and purposely
Speaker 2: destroy the US economy with tariffs. Figured that it was
Speaker 2: all just campaign rhetoric, and he would kind of back
Speaker 2: back and say, well, you know, hey, if they do
Speaker 2: what I say, then we won't put those terroriffs on them.
Speaker 2: But you know, on Monday this week, on January sixth,
Speaker 2: a Washington Post article came out to the same conclusion,
Speaker 2: stating that the terraffs would not be across the board,
Speaker 2: and that they would not be applying to every single
Speaker 2: item that is imported into the US, but that they
Speaker 2: wouldn't instead be targeted tariffs in some industries. But Trump
Speaker 2: was very quick to deny this, calling it fake news,
Speaker 2: and that he was indeed planning to implement across the
Speaker 2: board tariffs on all goods imported into the United States.
Speaker 2: Reuters has the story, said. Trump on Monday denied a
Speaker 2: newspaper report that his aids were exploring tariff plans that
Speaker 2: would only cover critical imports, deepening uncertainty among business leaders
Speaker 2: about the future US trade policies. We have Jeryl CLENTI
Speaker 2: will be joining us today. I'm interested to see what
Speaker 2: he thinks is going to happen with a trade war
Speaker 2: and with gold, and of course with war and all
Speaker 2: the rest. They've got a lot of things. We haven't
Speaker 2: talked to him since the new year, and he's put
Speaker 2: up on his trends journal. He's got his trends that
Speaker 2: he's identified for the coming year. So he's going to
Speaker 2: be joining us. In the last hour today, the story
Speaker 2: of the Washington Post said, Trump quoting my quoting so
Speaker 2: called anonymous sources which don't exist, in correctly states that
Speaker 2: my tariff policy will be paired back. That is wrong.
Speaker 2: The Washington Post knows it's wrong. It's just another example
Speaker 2: of fake news, he said. So it also occurs at
Speaker 2: the same time that Trump is now threatening to use
Speaker 2: the US military to invade and take over other countries
Speaker 2: for national security purposes. So fundamentally, though, like his emergency
Speaker 2: that wasn't an emergency, the COVID thing and the actions
Speaker 2: that he took, this is a war against the American
Speaker 2: people and a war against small businesses. Brian shall Hobby writes,
Speaker 2: most Americans, especially the MAGA crowd, have no idea what
Speaker 2: is about to happen to the US economy and how
Speaker 2: radically their lives are about to change in an unhinged
Speaker 2: Trump second term as a lame duck president who does
Speaker 2: not have to worry about being reelected anymore. And I've
Speaker 2: said this multiple times on this program. I said, either way,
Speaker 2: this last four years is the tail end of the
Speaker 2: fourth turning and guess what if it's And this is
Speaker 2: before La La got an't even I was about it.
Speaker 2: I said, whether it's Biden or Trump, it's their second term.
Speaker 2: And I said, I have yet to know in my
Speaker 2: long life any president who didn't get much much worse
Speaker 2: in their second term, knowing that they didn't have to
Speaker 2: run for reelection. And so I've been concerned about this
Speaker 2: as well. Goods at stores like Walmart, we'll see drastic
Speaker 2: price increases as most all their goods are imported from China,
Speaker 2: where Trump is threatening a sixty percent tariff, which could
Speaker 2: cause most products to double one price. And again, what
Speaker 2: we're seeing out of China is that in many regards
Speaker 2: it is a potempkin economy. They do have monopoly on manufacturing,
Speaker 2: and Trump is not going to address that issue. Said,
Speaker 2: tariffs aren't the issue. Just like you know, when you
Speaker 2: look at well, we've got to have everybody, have you verify,
Speaker 2: stop paying people to come live off of warfare. And
Speaker 2: in terms of the competition from China, they will have
Speaker 2: an unbreakable monopoly on this and everything else if we
Speaker 2: ban our energy use while we allow them to produce
Speaker 2: the cheapest, dirtiest energy possible. And yet Trump is not
Speaker 2: going to do anything. I wonder do you think that
Speaker 2: on his executive order list there's going to be anything
Speaker 2: about getting unto the Paris Climate Accord. Trump pretended that
Speaker 2: we were in it last time, it was never ratified
Speaker 2: by the Senate. Mitch McConnell pretended that we're in it.
Speaker 2: All the Democrats pretended we were in it. All the
Speaker 2: Republicans pretended that we were in it. And folks that
Speaker 2: more than anything else, I know a lot of people
Speaker 2: are looking at this. Look it's the New World Orders,
Speaker 2: Region one and all the rest of this stuff. Again,
Speaker 2: I don't think Canada is going to be pulled in
Speaker 2: as part of that as a unified political entity. But
Speaker 2: far more damning than any of that stuff is this
Speaker 2: Paris Climate Accord. That means that we will never be
Speaker 2: able to compete with China on energy, and it means
Speaker 2: that you won't have energy that you can afford to
Speaker 2: heat your home, to cook your food, to do all
Speaker 2: this other kind of stuff. It is going to eviscerate
Speaker 2: this economy even worse than the tariffs the Paris Climate Accord.
Speaker 2: But he's going to do the terraces and leave the
Speaker 2: Paris Climate coord in. So things are going to double
Speaker 2: in price. You know, Trump is an agent of chaos,
Speaker 2: an agent of disruption, an agent on the inside. Remember Fauci,
Speaker 2: how do you get everybody to take an untested vaccine worldwide?
Speaker 2: It's completely different. Well, you do it with chaos and disruption,
Speaker 2: You do it from the inside, and you do it iteratively. Well,
Speaker 2: I think we're about to get a sudden shock. And
Speaker 2: the iterative aspect has been going on now for four years.
Speaker 2: Really it goes back to Trump in twenty twenty, then
Speaker 2: it goes through the Biden administration, and now they're going
Speaker 2: to hand it back to Trump for some more disruption
Speaker 2: and chaos. It'll make product excet a minimum more expensive
Speaker 2: for consumers. Unlike what Trump says. These terrorists will get
Speaker 2: passed on. They don't get swallowed in whole by the manufacturer.
Speaker 2: Now nobody can afford to swallow the taxes. It's another tax,
Speaker 2: like a corporate tax, that has passed on in higher
Speaker 2: prices to consumers. A while back, Trump criticized ge for
Speaker 2: selling a suppliance unit to the Chinese, saying, we don't
Speaker 2: make those things here anymore. We should make them in
Speaker 2: the United States. Again, he's fighting the wrong enemy. If
Speaker 2: he wants to get manufacturing back here, first thing we
Speaker 2: need to do is make sure that there's no restrictions
Speaker 2: on cheap available energy bringing. To bring manufacturing back, you've
Speaker 2: got to bring cold plants back. It's the cheapest that's
Speaker 2: out there, and we can. We have an abundant supply
Speaker 2: of it that the Chinese don't have. So that's what
Speaker 2: we're not allowed to use. You say, they're allowed to
Speaker 2: use their minerals and resources and get other minerals and
Speaker 2: rest but we whatever we're rich in, that's got to
Speaker 2: be banned. That's why they're coming after. Cole Well, one
Speaker 2: of our think tank colleagues here in Washington, did a paper.
Speaker 2: He said, you want a toaster, this made in America.
Speaker 2: It cost you three hundred dollars, and it's going to
Speaker 2: become unobtainable with Paris left in. You know, he doesn't
Speaker 2: need any kind of special or dubious powers or executive orders.
Speaker 2: He needs to call out the BS about the Paris
Speaker 2: Climate Corps. They didn't have any where did they get
Speaker 2: the special powers to put this in? And you know,
Speaker 2: over note, Jonathan Turley had an article saying, well, you
Speaker 2: know Trump is going to oppose them. Biden is trying
Speaker 2: to ban some stuff and kick some stuff offline and everything,
Speaker 2: trying to outsmart Trump, and Trump needs to sue him
Speaker 2: right away. And it's like, where do we get this
Speaker 2: idea that Democrat executive orders are permanent but Republicans have
Speaker 2: to beg the permission of the court system to overturn
Speaker 2: it with their own executive order. How is that work?
Speaker 2: Why is a lawyer like Jonathan Turley promulgating that I
Speaker 2: talked about that and Trump's first term he pretended that, wow, yeah,
Speaker 2: they just self ratified the Paris Climate of Corps and
Speaker 2: we got DACO, which they said, well, we're not going
Speaker 2: to enforce the law. That's our executive order. We're not
Speaker 2: going to enforce the law. Well, I can't do anything
Speaker 2: about that. I have to ask the Supreme Court. And
Speaker 2: Spreme Court says, no, you can't, you can't overturn DOCA,
Speaker 2: and so no Al Biden is doing the same thing.
Speaker 2: He's putting in a bunch of last minute executive orders,
Speaker 2: and they're going to pretend that Trump can't overturn them.
Speaker 2: Do you understand what's going on here? Do you understand
Speaker 2: it's the UNI Party working here. They're just bluffing you.
Speaker 2: Trump's not that stupid. Neither is Jonathan Turley. Come on,
Speaker 2: an executive order by Democrats moving us in the direction
Speaker 2: that everybody wants us to go in the UNI Party,
Speaker 2: and it can't be overturned by Trump when he gets in.
Speaker 2: Come on, consider this is Charles Hughes Smith. Charles Hugh
Speaker 2: Smith said, to consider the supposedly low tech kitchen counter toaster.
Speaker 2: They're cheap, so they got to be easy to make.
Speaker 2: Right wrong, They're impossible to make without a highly sophisticated
Speaker 2: industrial supply chain, which is being destroyed by the way,
Speaker 2: by all these green agenda things. He says, Thomas Swaitts
Speaker 2: attempted to make a toaster from scratch, and you found
Speaker 2: that it was impossible to do so. He described the
Speaker 2: experience in his book The Toaster project Or, an heroic
Speaker 2: attempt to build a simple electric appliance from scratch. Well, yes,
Speaker 2: that's true, but it's also true that if you've got
Speaker 2: freedom and free markets and you don't have somebody putting
Speaker 2: a millstone around your neck. When it comes to energy
Speaker 2: and other things like that, go back to look at
Speaker 2: Leonard Read's eyepencil. How do you get that done? Well,
Speaker 2: you bring in parts and things from all over the world,
Speaker 2: and you build this thing a lot of people who
Speaker 2: are making materials other places, and finally somebody decides, well,
Speaker 2: I'm going to bring all these different materials, you know,
Speaker 2: the rubber from South America or wherever it is, and
Speaker 2: you know, this graphite from another place, and the wood
Speaker 2: from the Pacific Northwest. I'm going to make a pencil
Speaker 2: out of this thing. You can do that. You need
Speaker 2: to have freedom to do that, and you need to
Speaker 2: have to manufacture anything if you're going to be able
Speaker 2: to sell it. You can't pay four or five times
Speaker 2: what China does and energy, as a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: it's worse than that. We are paying a lot more
Speaker 2: than China does for electricity. And you know the solar
Speaker 2: panels that everybody feels so good about and virtue signals
Speaker 2: about that's made with coal energy from coal burning coal.
Speaker 2: They burn coal to make solar panels and then we
Speaker 2: buy the expensive solar panels, so we can feel good
Speaker 2: about it. But you know, if you're going to have
Speaker 2: that as the basis as the cost basis for manufacturing stuff,
Speaker 2: and look, manufacturing is going to become ever more energy
Speaker 2: intensive the more they automate it. If you get rid
Speaker 2: of human labor and sub to the extent that they
Speaker 2: continue to get rid of human labor and put in robots,
Speaker 2: well guess what, it's going to be impossibly expensive. And
Speaker 2: so we pay a lot more than China does. And
Speaker 2: the UK that has jumped into this Paris cord and everything,
Speaker 2: their energy prices like four to five times what our
Speaker 2: energy prices are. They can't compete with us. They certainly
Speaker 2: can't compete with China. Same thing with Germany. They're not
Speaker 2: going to be able to sell cars into China. They're
Speaker 2: not going to be able to sell cars in Europe
Speaker 2: because they are going down this path. So take a
Speaker 2: look at the food in your kitchen that you buy
Speaker 2: every week at the grocery store, says Brian shall Hobby.
Speaker 2: This would include a lot of meats that are imported
Speaker 2: from Canada, China, Australia, as well as food that is
Speaker 2: not produced in the US and cannot be produced in
Speaker 2: the US, things like bananas, coffee, tea, chocolate, most popular fruits,
Speaker 2: coconut oil which he goes great links to find coconut
Speaker 2: oil that is natural, organic, not gmo, doesn't have glycost,
Speaker 2: and all the rest of the stuff. And he sells
Speaker 2: natural grains and things, and he talks in most of
Speaker 2: this article, he talks about how difficult it's becoming for
Speaker 2: him to find this stuff. To find non gmo corn.
Speaker 2: Used to get it from Mexico, but now under the USMCA,
Speaker 2: they just told Mexico that no, you're going to have
Speaker 2: to grow gmo corn. Why well, because you know Monsanto
Speaker 2: wants you to do a bear now is own thing.
Speaker 2: Even with many foods that are produced in the US
Speaker 2: without imports, the demands for those foods will greatly increase,
Speaker 2: so they'll have a shortage and it'll drive up prices.
Speaker 2: As the US currently imports about two hundred billion dollars
Speaker 2: worth of food per year, many of the products have
Speaker 2: been contaminated with The crops growing in the US have
Speaker 2: been contaminated due to commercial agriculture to the proliferation of
Speaker 2: GMO and with crops that are contaminated with glycost, the
Speaker 2: largest toxic herbicide in the world. China in general does
Speaker 2: not import corn from the US anymore due to the
Speaker 2: contamination of usgmocorn. Most of their import of corn has
Speaker 2: now switched to Brazil. And he says to my own company,
Speaker 2: healthy traditions. We have tried to source US corn not
Speaker 2: contaminated which genetically modified DNA for ten years now unsuccessfully.
Speaker 2: But now his source in Mexico is going to disappear
Speaker 2: because we've had you know, we put together these trade agreements,
Speaker 2: and that was the other thing. Trump's US MCA. It's
Speaker 2: just a rebranded, worse version of the of what it replaced, NAFTA,
Speaker 2: And these things are treaties, and they have the lawyers
Speaker 2: who do the arbitration. They're treaty lawyers. But they did
Speaker 2: this with a three member dispute resolution panel. They do
Speaker 2: it through arbitration, and the US Trade Representative's office of
Speaker 2: the panel ruled in favor of all seven US legal
Speaker 2: claims to say that Mexico cannot stop gmocorns matter, right,
Speaker 2: They've got to grow it themselves. How do you like that.
Speaker 2: That's that's NAFTA, that's the USMCA doing that. Mexico has
Speaker 2: been importing gmocorn from the US for years, buying about
Speaker 2: three billion dollars worth of it annually that is used
Speaker 2: to feed livestock. The USDA notes that more than ninety
Speaker 2: percent of corn in the US is produced using genetically
Speaker 2: engineered varieties. While genetically modified organisms remain a part of
Speaker 2: the debate, the widely used but controversial herbicide round up
Speaker 2: clifhisi is classified as a proper carcogen by the World
Speaker 2: Health Organization and it permeates our food supply. So the
Speaker 2: US Trade Reps hailed last week's ruling statium that had
Speaker 2: upheld USMCA principles and protected big agriculture they like to say,
Speaker 2: us farmers. But anyway, this is where this is going
Speaker 2: to head. And the rest of his article is all
Speaker 2: about the different things, you know, trying to get corn, grains, honey,
Speaker 2: all these different things, and how difficult it's coconut o. Well,
Speaker 2: how difficult it is to try to get stuff that
Speaker 2: is not contaminated. So we're going to take a quick
Speaker 2: break and when we come back, we're going to talk
Speaker 2: about the contamination of money, money and politics. Yeah, and
Speaker 2: Nancy Pelosi had a great year. She's making doing better
Speaker 2: than the stock market averages. She's doing better than Warren Buffett.
Speaker 2: She's a genius when it comes to this stuff. Makes
Speaker 2: you wonder why she even bothers with politics. Oh wait,
Speaker 2: sinside training. We're going to take a break. But before
Speaker 2: we do, got some a lot of comments here, KWD.
Speaker 2: These are from yesterday. Has David ever had a mascot
Speaker 2: like guard Goldsmith's cat? Now? As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: we've got a couple of dogs. But if we were
Speaker 2: to put them in here, they would be kind of
Speaker 2: like bulls in a china shop with all the cords
Speaker 2: that we've got in the cameras that we've got in
Speaker 2: different places, and you wouldn't be able to see them
Speaker 2: either unless they were to hop up on the table
Speaker 2: or something. And Scout used to do that kind of stuff.
Speaker 2: But he's gotten hold. It's hard for him to even
Speaker 2: get in a chair anymore. And I do let him
Speaker 2: get in a chair. I've let him ruin a couple
Speaker 2: of chairs because I'd rather have him around than to
Speaker 2: have a chair, quite frankly, but we don't have anyway
Speaker 2: to set them up here. I guess we could get
Speaker 2: him a chair, maybe he would set up in it,
Speaker 2: but he usually just lies down in the chair now,
Speaker 2: so he's starting to slow down. Brandon's Revenge said, David
Speaker 2: wears a tie. That's his mascot. Mascot ascot, same different,
Speaker 2: he says. KWD sixty eight says Carter taught Sunday School
Speaker 2: for decades. But he had the song Imagine at his funeral,
Speaker 2: Imagine There's no Heaven. He'd also like to imagine There's
Speaker 2: no Hell. That is I did not know that he
Speaker 2: played Imagine at his funeral. Well, he was one of
Speaker 2: the first politicians to support LGBT stuff and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this. I mean, there's there is just this
Speaker 2: vast gulf between his professed Christianity and what you see
Speaker 2: in his life. Makes you wonder about these churches, doesn't it,
Speaker 2: Syrian Girl. So Trump admits that his second term is
Speaker 2: going to be a dictatorship. Yeah, like the first one,
Speaker 2: Brian Taylor. How is our government in any way limited?
Speaker 2: When the president can issue executive orders on anything he
Speaker 2: wants and everybody pretends that except for the Supreme Court,
Speaker 2: you got to make sure that there's two levels of
Speaker 2: executive orders. There's Republican executive orders and there's Democrat executive orders.
Speaker 2: According to Trump, Carlos Rex, thank you very much for
Speaker 2: the tip. I appreciate that he says good morning to
Speaker 2: all nights of the storm. Always glad to see all
Speaker 2: the same people and the same faces and all the
Speaker 2: same places. It is good. I have a great community here,
Speaker 2: Grammy for God. Desant has just made the Halo law too.
Speaker 2: People can't record first responders within twenty five feet. Yeah,
Speaker 2: so much for free speech and recording in public and
Speaker 2: catching Leo's violating law enforcement officers. Yeah, violating our freedom.
Speaker 2: That was just uppercase element. Took me second to grab that.
Speaker 2: Look again, it's everything about us must be exposed to them.
Speaker 2: Our speech, our thoughts, our actions. We should be a
Speaker 2: videotaped everywhere we go. But never, never are we to
Speaker 2: know anything about what government does. Even when they're doing
Speaker 2: things in public, we're not allowed to do that. You know,
Speaker 2: things like this, there's a guy skateboarding. Look like you've
Speaker 2: got a couple of crossing guards here. We're not We're
Speaker 2: not doing this. You know, two tough women on bicycles, Oh,
Speaker 2: they just took off his backpack. They're going to handcuff him.
Speaker 1: Boys had to stop.
Speaker 3: He stopped.
Speaker 1: That's called a stretching.
Speaker 3: Everybody's learn order.
Speaker 2: That's what.
Speaker 1: It's glass when you don't stop there.
Speaker 2: Yeah jaywalking. Yeah, we're gonna grab this guy, handcuff him.
Speaker 2: If they weren't any stronger, they could throw him on
Speaker 2: the ground. But I told you that I was recruited
Speaker 2: into libertarianism when I was in second grade by a
Speaker 2: crossing guard female. As a matter of fact, she had
Speaker 2: that that that orange sash, and I had to do
Speaker 2: everything she had to say. It's like I know how
Speaker 2: to cross the street without you. There's no car coming,
Speaker 2: I'm going, well, you know. So yeah, she didn't handcuff me.
Speaker 2: But you know, again, things that the government's getting worse office.
Speaker 2: So now you got two adult female crossing guards jaywalking,
Speaker 2: this guy jaywalked guard. Goldsmith's good to see Liberty Conspiracy
Speaker 2: on Rock Fan and Twitter evenings weekdays. He says the
Speaker 2: Constitution does not allowed the president to declare national emergencies,
Speaker 2: and therefore anything attached to giving him extra powers doing
Speaker 2: these so called national emergencies is an absurdity. But everybody
Speaker 2: wants it, well want it. Republicans want it, Democrats want it,
Speaker 2: mainstream media wants it really bad. The big businesses want it.
Speaker 2: Everybody just looks the other way. Nobody cares. Nobody cares
Speaker 2: about the Constitution. North American House Hippo coming soon to
Speaker 2: the Bablin b deadly LA fires leave thousands of pillars
Speaker 2: of salt in this week. You should be riding their headlines.
Speaker 2: That's get out and don't look back from LA. That's
Speaker 2: what I say in Hollywood and all the rest of
Speaker 2: that stuff. Well, we're gonna take a quick break and
Speaker 2: we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Analyzing the globalists next move. And now the deep and nutshell.
Speaker 2: Well, there was a Canadian Burger King. I think it
Speaker 2: was at a special a two dollars resignation burger to
Speaker 2: celebrate the resignation of Trudeau. Dairy Queen, dairy queen, that's
Speaker 2: what it was. I can't remember King Queen, I don't
Speaker 2: know what it is. Dairy queen, Burger King. When did
Speaker 2: they get married? I don't know. Was there going to
Speaker 2: be a corporate merger between dairy Queen and Burger King? Anyway?
Speaker 2: Nancy Pelosi, how do we celebrate when she's gone, and
Speaker 2: of course she's not going to leave voluntarily. They'll be
Speaker 2: carrying her out feet first, like they do most of
Speaker 2: these power hungry people. She left temporarily, but she just
Speaker 2: had to come back. She needed that power, and she
Speaker 2: had the special insights that she gets from being in Congress.
Speaker 2: Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio exploded in value, beat the market
Speaker 2: by nearly two hundred percent, beat the SMP five hundred
Speaker 2: by nearly two hundred percent last year, continuing her streak
Speaker 2: of out performing the stock indexes she had. Her portfolio
Speaker 2: grew by seventy one percent from December twenty ninth, twenty
Speaker 2: twenty four to December thirtieth, twenty twenty four, twenty twenty three,
Speaker 2: so from just one day no from from twenty twenty
Speaker 2: three to twenty twenty four, Compared to the SMP five hundred,
Speaker 2: which went up by twenty five percent, she went up
Speaker 2: by seventy one percent. And she outdid many of the
Speaker 2: world's oldest and largest hedge funds in twenty twenty four
Speaker 2: as well, including Citadel, which had sixty six billion in assets,
Speaker 2: and also Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway. She he had a
Speaker 2: twenty seven percent return on his investments there, so he
Speaker 2: beat the market. It was twenty five percent. He was
Speaker 2: twenty seven percent, but she was seventy one percent. Well,
Speaker 2: insider trading is that what Trump is doing, is that
Speaker 2: what Musk is doing right, And look at you know,
Speaker 2: her portfolio goes up by seventy one percent. His entire
Speaker 2: net worth nearly doubled by dumping two hundred million dollars
Speaker 2: into Trump, because see, Musk isn't buying stocks, He's buying Trump.
Speaker 2: It's a lot more effective to do that. It's another
Speaker 2: kind of insider trading. Of course, he got on the inside.
Speaker 2: And Trump's inaugural commit it is open to everybody. He
Speaker 2: has now taken in a record one hundred and seventy
Speaker 2: million dollars. Biden four years ago raised sixty two million
Speaker 2: dollars for his inaugural committee. So this is nearly three
Speaker 2: times at amount that he's raised a record. And of
Speaker 2: course you got big tech executives, big donors all jumping
Speaker 2: in on this. And I don't think this even counts
Speaker 2: things like the forty million dollars that Jeff Bezos is
Speaker 2: Amazon threw in to do a last minute documentary about
Speaker 2: Millennia Trump's life. You know, look at that they did
Speaker 2: that in just like the last month or so. That's
Speaker 2: going to be one of the worst things ever. I mean,
Speaker 2: you know, it was simply a you know, a political
Speaker 2: payoff that is there. I'm getting myself curious that I
Speaker 2: might actually look at a couple minutes of it just
Speaker 2: to see how bad it is. It's got to be
Speaker 2: absolutely horrible. And they just threw this thing together on
Speaker 2: the spur of the moment, and I guess that's what
Speaker 2: he went down to mar Lago to talk to them about.
Speaker 2: And I'm sure that Trump loves that, because that's another
Speaker 2: it's not just to make the Trumps look good, but
Speaker 2: it's another way to draw Milania back into the public sphere.
Speaker 2: She pretty much is sick and tired of this whole thing,
Speaker 2: don't want have anything to do with it during the
Speaker 2: during that, but now she's there by his side because
Speaker 2: you know, they're going to make a big deal out
Speaker 2: of her. So that forty million dollar subsidy there that's
Speaker 2: not even included in this inaugural committee thing of one
Speaker 2: hundred and seventy million dollars, So he put that in
Speaker 2: two hundred and ten million dollars. There you go. And
Speaker 2: then the private donations are typically used to help pay
Speaker 2: for events surrounding the inauguration, and then there's a lot
Speaker 2: of individual parties where a lot of money is being
Speaker 2: passed around as well. I talked three four about the
Speaker 2: MAHA Make America Healthy Again, and you can do that
Speaker 2: for what was it, thirty thousand dollars a ticket? I
Speaker 2: think they had the goal ticket was like thirty thousand
Speaker 2: and a ten thousand dollar thing. And if you want
Speaker 2: to wait in the cold until after nine pm, you
Speaker 2: can get in for only five hundred dollars. But of
Speaker 2: course that has no special privileges, and it's probably after
Speaker 2: everybody has left that you would want to get your
Speaker 2: autograph from. I'm just dying to get an autograph from
Speaker 2: Donald Trump. It's got the goal of my life. I
Speaker 2: guess Amazon and Meta at the parent company on Facebook
Speaker 2: and Instagram. Last month, we're each planning to donate a
Speaker 2: million dollars to Trump's inaugural fund. He should have different
Speaker 2: echelons with names. That's the Pfeiser level. You know, it
Speaker 2: was Pfiser that gave him instead of gold and silver.
Speaker 2: That's so so yesterday, right, listen, I'm a Pheiser level
Speaker 2: donor because you know, Pfiser was able to put a
Speaker 2: million dollars in and get tens of billions of dollars.
Speaker 2: Actually a lot more than that. It's more than just
Speaker 2: their sales, because you know, the government helped them with
Speaker 2: the manufacturing, and the government distributed it for them, and
Speaker 2: most importantly, the government held them harmless for all the
Speaker 2: people that they intentionally killed. MAGA influencers, meanwhile, are being
Speaker 2: paid to promote Israel wind farms and weed legalization and
Speaker 2: much more. This is a report from Information Liberation. Rogan
Speaker 2: O Henley, who goes by the handle d C Draino
Speaker 2: on Twitter, has over two million followers, and he was
Speaker 2: paid one hundred and sixty four thousand dollars to tweet
Speaker 2: in favor of legalizing marijuana in Florida. And that's why
Speaker 2: he got exposed was because it had to be registered
Speaker 2: I guess in Florida. It was a Florida report that
Speaker 2: he's got embedded in the article here. And David Freeman,
Speaker 2: who goes by Gunter Eagleman on Twitter and has one
Speaker 2: point one million followers, was importedly paid to share this
Speaker 2: petition program promoting wind energy and Texas. I wonder if
Speaker 2: the windmills are freezing there yet? Yeah, having some super
Speaker 2: cold weather there like they did before. And uh so,
Speaker 2: yeah breaking calling all of my Texan followers, make your
Speaker 2: voice heard. We all remember the huge power outage in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty one that caused millions to lose power. So
Speaker 2: you know we need to we need to do more
Speaker 2: of that. You know, the answer is always more of
Speaker 2: what failed to work, isn't it. One person responded, Rolando
Speaker 2: Garcia Gunter Eagleman, how much were you paid to promote
Speaker 2: this renewable energy wind and solar nonsense? Yeah? This is
Speaker 2: it is amazing, isn't it. You know you never realize,
Speaker 2: do you just how these people are playing you? You know,
Speaker 2: people like cat Turd and all the rest of them
Speaker 2: getting big bucks under the table to light to you.
Speaker 2: And why do you think they're not shadowband? Why do
Speaker 2: you think these MAGA influencers are promoted by the algorithm?
Speaker 2: What do you think that is? He later deleted the
Speaker 2: post after his pay to promote message was called out.
Speaker 2: Rolando Garcia that I just read that as a State
Speaker 2: Republican Executive Committee member, Tony Ortiz says MAGA celebrities and
Speaker 2: influencers have also recently started doing under the table paid
Speaker 2: wind energy promotions here in Texas. So we spoke to
Speaker 2: one Florida MAGA influencer pushing Texas wind energy, who said
Speaker 2: he's generally paid per signature when promoting petitions. A copy
Speaker 2: of the paid work order ten dollars per signature up
Speaker 2: to twelve thousand dollars is able to be earned. Urban
Speaker 2: Legend does ask that influencers include proper disclosures, but it
Speaker 2: seems that many don't include that and their disclosure. Unsurprisingly,
Speaker 2: Twitter influencers are also being paid to shill for Israel
Speaker 2: big bucks there, I guess. Tony Ortiz pointed out influencers
Speaker 2: are generally provided direct talking points when they're paid to promote,
Speaker 2: oftentimes or even paid to promote foreign country messaging as
Speaker 2: seen and they've got several different examples of this when
Speaker 2: them doing that, and look, it's just it's across the board.
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk, it was just in Greenland with a Trump
Speaker 2: Junior talking points. USA contributor Morgan Blair McMichael proud to
Speaker 2: be quoted in The Wall Street Journal last month saying,
Speaker 2: quote the legacy media will continue to fold and bend
Speaker 2: the knee to us, because it's true we are the media.
Speaker 2: They have become what they fought, right, isn't that what
Speaker 2: we always worry about? That you become what you fight,
Speaker 2: You become bought and paid for shows. That's what most
Speaker 2: of these people are. David Ike's been calling him out.
Speaker 2: I don't even bother anymore with social media. It's such
Speaker 2: a rigged, silly game. I don't think I've even posted
Speaker 2: the show last couple of days on Twitter. I just
Speaker 2: don't even care. Here she is tweeting out those paid promotions,
Speaker 2: chilling on behalf of Israel without any disclosure. She said,
Speaker 2: I stand with Israel as they fight for their lives
Speaker 2: in the land hamas terrorists have invaded and innocent blood
Speaker 2: is being shed. Please sign this petition and show that
Speaker 2: you support Israel. How about you show us the money
Speaker 2: that you're being paid. I've had some disclosure there. Meet
Speaker 2: the new media same as the old media. Chris Manahan
Speaker 2: at Information Liberation Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massey highlighted the issue
Speaker 2: of influencers being on the take. He said, who are
Speaker 2: the most rewarded? Is that word? Nardid? I don't know
Speaker 2: if that's a word or not. Who are the most
Speaker 2: highly paid influencers on this platform. Let's just say, right,
Speaker 2: does anyone else compete with Kat Poop and DC Drainage
Speaker 2: for this title? What's funny is nobody pays me to
Speaker 2: call out your hypocrisy and your anti Trump obstructionism, said
Speaker 2: DC Drainage. D C Draino is what he is. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I do it all for free.
Speaker 3: You know what.
Speaker 2: Thomas Massey is not a hypocrite. These guys are. Thomas
Speaker 2: Massey got in trouble with trump Land because he didn't
Speaker 2: want to sign on to the trillions and trillions and
Speaker 2: trillions of dollars destroying this country. Thomas Massey got in
Speaker 2: trouble with trump Land because he even talked about the deficit.
Speaker 2: They said, shut up. You know you're opposing Trump and
Speaker 2: you're opposing Mike Johnson, who won deficits. Deficits are good
Speaker 2: if they want it. They're only bad if you've got
Speaker 2: Biden who wants it. Right. The kind of childishness that
Speaker 2: comes from cat Turd, it comes from DC Draino. It's ridiculous. Yeah,
Speaker 2: you do it for free? Do you you know what
Speaker 2: it earns you to be a Trump sycophant. Podcasters, influencers
Speaker 2: and activists should be encouraged to make money posting on
Speaker 2: the internet, said DC Draino oh Henley. Our entire legacy
Speaker 2: media ecosystem is hijacked by globalist, multi billion dollar corporations,
Speaker 2: and we're the only truth tellers left. Now. When you
Speaker 2: take their coin, you're going to wind up eventually saying
Speaker 2: everything they want you to say. Just that simple. If
Speaker 2: independent media disappears, so does the Trump movement. Well they're
Speaker 2: not independent. They're beholding to Trump, They're beholding to MAGA,
Speaker 2: and they have to confirm the bias of people in
Speaker 2: order to make money. That's what it's all about. The
Speaker 2: only way for MAGA to make money is to push
Speaker 2: legalized WHED and to show for Israel. Is that right?
Speaker 2: The overwhelming majority of these popular influencers are worse than worthless,
Speaker 2: says Information Liberation. Musk and Trump promote these MAGA tars
Speaker 2: because they know they come cheap, and they won't push
Speaker 2: back against their plan to flood our country with Indians
Speaker 2: through mass legal immigration and through other things. I mean,
Speaker 2: that's not the only place of betrayal that's there By
Speaker 2: the way, Musk is now saying all this talk that
Speaker 2: everybody's been saying for the last couple of months, doj
Speaker 2: is going to cut two trillion dollars. I told you
Speaker 2: that wasn't possible. And he says, well, that would be
Speaker 2: a best case outcome. Now, a best case outcome. I
Speaker 2: wonder who that woman shouting where the purple hair is?
Speaker 2: Pull the hill and they got some video thing run
Speaker 2: in there in the background. He says, if you look
Speaker 2: at any direct people are like, well, where will you
Speaker 2: find places to save money? It's like being in a
Speaker 2: room full of targets. Musk said, well, he can't cut
Speaker 2: a single dime. Musk cannot cut a single dime from
Speaker 2: the budget. All that he can do is make recommendations.
Speaker 2: And we have seen this done over and over again
Speaker 2: with committee after committee after committee. Now he does have
Speaker 2: a lot of clout and he can bring a lot
Speaker 2: of pressure to bear with Twitter. That's why he bought it.
Speaker 2: It was not an altruistic move to say free speech
Speaker 2: speech on Twitter is not. Free speech on Twitter is
Speaker 2: bought Elon. Musk bought it, and he bought his speech
Speaker 2: every time I log on. That's one of the other
Speaker 2: reasons I don't like to get on there. Every time
Speaker 2: I get on, there's always an Elon Musk thing pushed
Speaker 2: at me. I don't even follow the guy, and it's
Speaker 2: always there at the top, and the people that I
Speaker 2: want to hear from get buried. Twelve June seventeen seventy six. Yip,
Speaker 2: all social media influencers all should have to wear the
Speaker 2: paid sponsors on their links, like NASCAR. Absolutely true. We're
Speaker 2: gonna take a quick break. We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 2: They're doing what in the place they named after me?
Speaker 2: Good thing.
Speaker 4: I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed
Speaker 4: on the plots of these traders.
Speaker 1: Making sense common again. This is the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: That's right, boys and girls. There's a post election sale
Speaker 3: on silver and gold. Trump Viertoria has caused a nip
Speaker 3: in silver and gold. It's time to buy some medals
Speaker 3: with vietnalls before they come to their since is go
Speaker 3: to David Knight dot Gold to get in touch with
Speaker 3: the wise wolf himself, Tony Harterburn. He knows where to
Speaker 3: look to find silver and gold.
Speaker 2: A little little night.
Speaker 3: Yuck beyond.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we'll talk a little bit about Fiat coming up,
Speaker 2: but I want to do some listeners letters. I haven't
Speaker 2: been this getting behind here, I'm trying to catch up.
Speaker 2: I had this from Will with a hand painted miniatures
Speaker 2: and kits. He said, David, just wondering about your opening theme.
Speaker 2: So it seems to have slightly changed. I hear some differences,
Speaker 2: although minimal in the orchestration. Let me know if this
Speaker 2: is a case or are my ears deceiving me. No, actually,
Speaker 2: you're absolutely right, and you know a keen discernment there.
Speaker 2: Nobody else has mentioned that. Of course, the obvious thing
Speaker 2: is the graphics that are there that we put in.
Speaker 2: But I thought, you know, well, okay, we're going to
Speaker 2: do some different graphics. Let me I haven't hadn't updated
Speaker 2: that theme since early twenty twenty one, so I thought, well,
Speaker 2: I think I can do better. Now I've got some
Speaker 2: better brass that is has keener articulation. As a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, the whole reason I did it the way
Speaker 2: that I did it was because I couldn't do Liberty
Speaker 2: fanfare way that way. It was written at the very
Speaker 2: beginning with the trumpets that I had and have it
Speaker 2: sound real. It sounded like sounded real synthetic, but I've
Speaker 2: got better trumpets, so I thought, well, let me just
Speaker 2: change the beginning there. I had a little bit better
Speaker 2: articulation on the on the timpany that was there as well,
Speaker 2: with a couple of libraries that I'd gotten over the
Speaker 2: last four years, and so I started doing that. And
Speaker 2: then what happens is you tell yourself this is going
Speaker 2: to be a simple thing, and when you go in
Speaker 2: and you change something like that, it changes everything because
Speaker 2: now you've got to remix everything as well, because you
Speaker 2: bring in different instruments and now you got to remix it.
Speaker 2: I should have known better, I've done this thing before,
Speaker 2: but I thought, I'm going to leave, you know, most
Speaker 2: of it the same. I'll just change the brass at
Speaker 2: the very beginning and just before the very end. But
Speaker 2: then that wound up changing a lot of stuff. And
Speaker 2: you know, it was the trumpets and the French horns
Speaker 2: and things like lower brass, you know, trombones and other
Speaker 2: things that had greater clarity in it. And then I
Speaker 2: changed the strings at the end just a little bit
Speaker 2: to give them more dynamic range. But thanks for asking,
Speaker 2: will yes, that is right, and we freshened that up
Speaker 2: as well, hope it sounds better because it is different
Speaker 2: and nobody else had noticed that. This is from Greg
Speaker 2: who says, FYI, your site on Rumble has disappeared from
Speaker 2: the popular list, and my Rumble Android app under following,
Speaker 2: and so he follows different ones, and now my app
Speaker 2: has disappeared on my show, he says, I now have
Speaker 2: to use a search function to access your channel, even
Speaker 2: though he was following it isn't that interesting. This is
Speaker 2: the same kind of stuff that I saw. One of
Speaker 2: the first things that I saw years ago on Twitter
Speaker 2: was Karen. They kept and having her unfollow me. They
Speaker 2: did it at least twice. They had me unfollow some
Speaker 2: other people as well, and then they suggested to Karen
Speaker 2: that you follow occasional Cortex, which there's no way in
Speaker 2: the world. And you know, all she would do is
Speaker 2: she would look at what I had and she would
Speaker 2: retweet it and everything, and then they unfollowed her from me.
Speaker 2: It's not based on an algorithm, it's based on what
Speaker 2: they want to do. And it's troubling to see Rumble
Speaker 2: doing that, really troubling. But I don't trust the people
Speaker 2: at Rumble. I don't trust the people who own it,
Speaker 2: and as I said the other day, they just got
Speaker 2: another seven hundred and fifty million dollars three quarters of
Speaker 2: a billion dollars, and I'm struggling to try to get
Speaker 2: them to pay me what you people have kindly put
Speaker 2: in as tips. I'm about ready to blow the whistle
Speaker 2: on all of this stuff with Rumble because they're just
Speaker 2: blowing us off, and they hid. The way that they
Speaker 2: they restructured their website make it more difficult for you.
Speaker 2: But I've got I've got months that go back into
Speaker 2: the summer that they haven't paid us for and they're
Speaker 2: still not issuing a check every month to other people.
Speaker 2: What they do is they you know, like Spreaker, the
Speaker 2: ads that are on Spreaker, they wait two months and
Speaker 2: then they'll send you a check. But they do it
Speaker 2: on a regular basis. There appears to be no rhyme
Speaker 2: or reason as to when Rumble releases the checks. It's
Speaker 2: kind of like when they feel like doing it. And
Speaker 2: we have called them over and over again, and now
Speaker 2: they're shadow banning me on Rumble and we're going to
Speaker 2: need to move to another platform, which is going to
Speaker 2: be that simple. But this is a letter from Adam
Speaker 2: and so it's according to doctor Google. During the Thomas Fire,
Speaker 2: this is a fire that was back in twenty seventeen
Speaker 2: in California. December of twenty seventeen. During the Thomas Fire,
Speaker 2: the Global Supertanker, a Boeing seven forty seven four hundred aircraft,
Speaker 2: was deployed to assist in firefighting efforts, essentially meaning one
Speaker 2: large supertanker was used to combat the blaze. This aircraft
Speaker 2: is considered the largest firefighting air tanker in the world.
Speaker 2: They can carry up to nineteen six hundred US gallons
Speaker 2: of water or fire retardant. California had to plead and
Speaker 2: cajole to get just one down here from Canada Canadian
Speaker 2: Government Center, because the US government can't be bothered, you know,
Speaker 2: And that's what everybody is saying. It's like, what is
Speaker 2: going on? Why is it that there's nothing spared to
Speaker 2: go to Ukraine, But we can't do anything to help
Speaker 2: the people in North Carolina and we can't that were
Speaker 2: hurt by Hurricane Helene. They're not going to do anything
Speaker 2: to fight the fire. All of this expensive stuff that
Speaker 2: they got, it's about creating fires. It's about creating explosions
Speaker 2: and death. They don't want to do anything to save
Speaker 2: lives or help Americans. It's all about their global politics.
Speaker 2: The more I look at this, the more astounding it
Speaker 2: is to see how much our government hates us, how
Speaker 2: much they hate us, that our government is just so
Speaker 2: thoroughly ensconced in the occult and in death, murder, coups, wars,
Speaker 2: you name it, and they absolutely despise us. They rob us,
Speaker 2: they use us, they turn their backs on us. They'd
Speaker 2: be bad enough if it was just negligence, but no,
Speaker 2: they actively attack us with these things, and says we
Speaker 2: only scored one again for this catastrophe only after nine
Speaker 2: thousand homes where either damage are destroyed. The US can
Speaker 2: spend two trillion dollars on the F thirty five to
Speaker 2: attack overseas, but can't supply us with any more of
Speaker 2: these supertankers. No more aircraft are being converted or built
Speaker 2: than I don't even want to have it to fight
Speaker 2: the fires. They want this country to burn down. You know,
Speaker 2: it's not just fiddling. While Rome burned, he had his
Speaker 2: own build back better program going on.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: Human nature doesn't change, and the nature of politicians doesn't change. Nero.
Speaker 2: Many people believe that Nero set the fires in Rome
Speaker 2: that did so much damage because he wanted to completely
Speaker 2: rebuild the area the way he wanted it. I mean,
Speaker 2: his plans were not as evil as what these people
Speaker 2: want to do. You know, he didn't have a system,
Speaker 2: he didn't have the technology to do what these people
Speaker 2: want to do. He would have done it if he
Speaker 2: had it, of course, But anyway, he sets the fires
Speaker 2: himself because he wants to rebuild it the way you know,
Speaker 2: and change it, and then he blames it on the Christians.
Speaker 2: That sounds familiar, does it? No more aircraft are being
Speaker 2: converted or built. Is it true that the military has
Speaker 2: only one deployed from Colorado Springs, Colorado? When needed? Quote unquote, well,
Speaker 2: I don't know. This is from Joseph who he says,
Speaker 2: we got extremely low twenty twenty four US mint numbers,
Speaker 2: he says, He says, I've yet I listen to you
Speaker 2: every day. I've yet to hear anything from you about this.
Speaker 2: He said, the US mint production numbers are unsettlingly low,
Speaker 2: scary low. And he's got screenshots of what they have
Speaker 2: been producing and comparing it to previous years. In other words,
Speaker 2: they're not minting any coins. They're really seriously cut back.
Speaker 2: I'm not saying they're not minting any but they're seriously
Speaker 2: cutting back, so much so that people are paying a
Speaker 2: premium for newly minted stuff. These are not collectible items
Speaker 2: that people are doing, he says. Rolls of twenty twenty
Speaker 2: four nickels are now selling for eighty dollars a roll.
Speaker 2: He said, that has a face value of two dollars
Speaker 2: a roll. Right, it's forty nickels, and it's selling for
Speaker 2: eighty dollars a roll, so it's two dollars a nickel
Speaker 2: instead of two dollars a roll of nichols. I've seen
Speaker 2: whole boxes of twenty twenty four nickels being sold on
Speaker 2: eBay for eighteen hundred dollars in over the twenty twenty
Speaker 2: four Lincoln cent the penny is the lowest minted sent
Speaker 2: a number of these that they've minted since nineteen sixty nine.
Speaker 2: The Federal Reserve historically orders more Lincoln since than any
Speaker 2: other coin, he said. Milton Friedman claimed inflation was too
Speaker 2: much money chasing two little goods and that a recession
Speaker 2: was not enough money chasing the goods. Well, I see
Speaker 2: something different in this, because you know what we're talking
Speaker 2: about here is the difference between M one and M two.
Speaker 2: And they've got another M three, which they don't talk
Speaker 2: about anymore, and they recently just changed the Federal Reserve
Speaker 2: just changed the definition of M one. M one typically
Speaker 2: been currency and checking, you know, demand deposits and stuff
Speaker 2: like that. M two would be their treasury bills and bonds,
Speaker 2: and it would be things like savings accounts and stuff
Speaker 2: like that. They put the same means account I think
Speaker 2: in now in M one or whatever, but the cash
Speaker 2: and the currency aspect of it. Yeah, it is interesting
Speaker 2: because as they create dollars, and as Tony has talked
Speaker 2: about it, they've you know, most of the dollars that
Speaker 2: have been created have been done recently. So it isn't
Speaker 2: like they're not they're not printing enough money. They're actually
Speaker 2: printing too much money. They're just not doing it for
Speaker 2: cash because they want to move us into a digital economy.
Speaker 2: When they talked to Jerome Powell through back in twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: when Trump was doing all of this universal basic income
Speaker 2: training giving people stimulus checks to get them accustomed to
Speaker 2: universal basic income. At that point, somebody's interviewing Jerome parents
Speaker 2: said well, you're just printing all this money. He says, well,
Speaker 2: we're not printing it. He says, we're just adding numbers
Speaker 2: on the computer. And I laughed about it, and I said, yeah,
Speaker 2: if I said, dislike for that three and a half
Speaker 2: trillion dollar thing, I said, if you had one dollar
Speaker 2: bills that were stacked, and I look to see how
Speaker 2: a newly minted stack of you know, flat bills that
Speaker 2: have not been in circulation, how high that would be.
Speaker 2: And I said, you know, three tollion dollars of that
Speaker 2: would span the distance from Earth to the moon and
Speaker 2: like halfway back or something. That's it's been five years,
Speaker 2: so I don't remember exactly, but that was in twenty
Speaker 2: twenty when he was putting that stuff out. But it's
Speaker 2: just all, you know, they're not physically printing anything. That'd
Speaker 2: be a lot of trees, but they're not physically printing
Speaker 2: the money, and they're not minting the coins because they
Speaker 2: want to get people off of cash. And so the
Speaker 2: problem is is that it is going to be too
Speaker 2: much money chasing two little goods, and it is going
Speaker 2: to be inflation, but it's going to be cashless as well.
Speaker 2: That's the really scary part. Of this, the cashless aspect.
Speaker 2: He says, money that is circulating is that the government
Speaker 2: is spending pretty much. Yeah, that's what they're creating on
Speaker 2: the ledgers. The government has become the economy. That's not capitalism,
Speaker 2: that's socialism in its war. He's absolutely right about that.
Speaker 2: I totally agree with that. And then we have this
Speaker 2: is from John he said in reference to your January
Speaker 2: the seventh show where I was talking about January the
Speaker 2: sixth and the the Agent Provocateurs there, he said, I'm
Speaker 2: always trying to refer to old books to people help
Speaker 2: them interpret current events. And he says, you know a
Speaker 2: few people know that, but before we had nineteen eighty four,
Speaker 2: they came out in nineteen forty eight, or Brave New
Speaker 2: World in nineteen thirty two. We had a Russian novel
Speaker 2: that was called We We and that was in nineteen
Speaker 2: twenty something. And so again there's a lot of people
Speaker 2: that have written about this dystopian thing. But of course
Speaker 2: it's all falling in the patterns, and we can understand
Speaker 2: how this is going to work because we know what
Speaker 2: human nature is. Just like Nero, you know, he's got
Speaker 2: a different way to burn down Rome. But you know
Speaker 2: he's doing it for basically his own purposes, and he's
Speaker 2: going to blame it on other people in a false
Speaker 2: flag fire right. He says, I'm always trying to get
Speaker 2: people to read Jack London's book as well. Iron heel.
Speaker 2: I've not read that. Actually I've not read We either.
Speaker 2: I have to take a look at those. I got
Speaker 2: a lot of things on my reading list, though. Unfortunately,
Speaker 2: stacking Up he said a few things that led to
Speaker 2: Jack London's personal downfall, its character, assassination, untimely death at forty.
Speaker 2: I wasn't aware that he was. I don't know Jack
Speaker 2: London that well, only no Call of the Wild, and
Speaker 2: so I kind of surprised to see that he was
Speaker 2: involved in politics. The nineteen ninety one publication The Illuminati,
Speaker 2: he says, by Larry Burkett, chapter ten, outlines the exact
Speaker 2: scenario you outlined back in twenty twenty one, different circumstances,
Speaker 2: but the book presents the basic premise of sidelining an
Speaker 2: event using agent provocateurs. In this case, the provocateurs were
Speaker 2: armed and we're standing with Christian protesters, and when the
Speaker 2: face off began, these provocateurs produced their concealed weapons and
Speaker 2: began to indiscriminately fire fully automatic weapons at police officers,
Speaker 2: striking several police officers, with the expected result of police
Speaker 2: regrouping returning fire on the unarmed masses of Christians pretty
Speaker 2: similar too, Unfortunately, do what happened with January sixth. I mean,
Speaker 2: there wasn't any gunshots there, but the agent provocateurs got
Speaker 2: it all done. He says he talked to his son
Speaker 2: and gave him a link to the show, and he
Speaker 2: said his son came back and said, really, Dad, you
Speaker 2: need therapy. What kind of wacko garbage are you listening
Speaker 2: to up there in Montana? You needed to get a life.
Speaker 2: I believe in science and I believe in doctors. Well,
Speaker 2: I would say take your pick. You can have science
Speaker 2: or you can have doctors. You can't have both. They're
Speaker 2: mutually exclusive anymore.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 2: They're all about money. They're not about science. That's the
Speaker 2: whole thing when you look at it. Have they isolated
Speaker 2: this stuff? Will they give us any proof?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 2: No, As I said, for the longest time, looks science.
Speaker 2: And I'll say it again. It's been a while since
Speaker 2: I said it. But scientific method, put in by Francis Bacon,
Speaker 2: was in opposition to what he called academia. In his day,
Speaker 2: if somebody at a well known institution or someplace that
Speaker 2: people was something that was well connected politically or thought
Speaker 2: of highly esteemed, well whatever they said went and he said, no,
Speaker 2: we're going to have people show their work. We need
Speaker 2: to have the ability to reproduce theirs and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff, or it's not science. We're going
Speaker 2: to be objective about it. We're going to be able
Speaker 2: to see the data. These people hide everything that they do.
Speaker 2: So the group that tried to get the data from
Speaker 2: Michael Mann, he would not give it up, and FACCI
Speaker 2: doesn't want to give it up. Now these people want
Speaker 2: to give it up. They don't want to show you
Speaker 2: the isolated COVID virus because they don't have it. It's
Speaker 2: just a model that they used. It's not science. It's
Speaker 2: an argument from authority. I'm Sillien's right anyway. One more
Speaker 2: thing that he had that I thought was interesting, he
Speaker 2: said from his days as a airguard see one thirty
Speaker 2: pilot back in nineteen eighty four eighty five about a
Speaker 2: young woman that was working at Vandenberg Air Force Base
Speaker 2: as an intern while working on our PhD he said,
Speaker 2: this young woman, with everything in life ahead of her,
Speaker 2: used her top secret level credentials to gain access to
Speaker 2: a GPS satellite clean room, where she proceeded to attack
Speaker 2: the satellite with a sledgehand, completely destroying the twenty million
Speaker 2: dollar device. The female news reporter laughingly said, the deranged
Speaker 2: woman whose job had been writing code to be used
Speaker 2: by the satellite hardware computers to be used for early
Speaker 2: launch warning, so that she gave a rambling statement to
Speaker 2: authorities about objecting to new code mandates that violated the
Speaker 2: public's interest in personal privacy, etc. The poor woman was
Speaker 2: never seen or heard from again or on the news.
Speaker 2: No trial, no court deposition of the criminal case. I
Speaker 2: know because I tried to follow it back when we
Speaker 2: only had a few propaganda channels for several years. They said,
Speaker 2: so I'll just throw in. That was something that Steve p.
Speaker 2: Chennick was very proud of, Besides working for Henry Kissinger,
Speaker 2: besides being a part of Operation Gladio, besides being according
Speaker 2: to the Italian government's investigation, he was the one who
Speaker 2: met with kidnapped Italian Prime Minister Aldo Mooroon gave the
Speaker 2: order to have him killed. Steve Patentick also bragged, and
Speaker 2: who knows if it's true or not, because outside of
Speaker 2: the things that were verified by the Italian government about
Speaker 2: Operation Gladio, I wouldn't believe a word that comes out
Speaker 2: of Steve Patenick's mouth. But one of the things that
Speaker 2: he bragged about because he has a background in psychology,
Speaker 2: and he said he was the guy that was there
Speaker 2: when somebody would try to crash the gates of the
Speaker 2: White House or something like that. He said he was
Speaker 2: the one who would evaluate them, and he laughed about it.
Speaker 2: He said, those people disappeared. You never hear from him again. Wow,
Speaker 2: what a monster. It's absolutely amazing. No trial, nothing, just
Speaker 2: like this. Right, you get in their way and you
Speaker 2: just disappear. This is from Adam. He says, my son
Speaker 2: was a top gamer. This is about Elon Musk and
Speaker 2: what I had to say about him. He said, my
Speaker 2: son was a top gamer while working two full time jobs.
Speaker 2: My grandson, however, is a celebrity gamer who votes much
Speaker 2: more time to it. He said, Elon might be more
Speaker 2: talented to my son, but less talented than my grandson.
Speaker 2: So let's not blame him for one of the very
Speaker 2: few crimes that he didn't commit. Well, I would just say,
Speaker 2: you know, that's pretty amazing that your son would be
Speaker 2: a top gamer while working two full time jobs. Elon Musk,
Speaker 2: on the other hand, has got six large companies that
Speaker 2: he's supposedly running. That was my point, not to condemn its,
Speaker 2: just to say that, you know, he has about as
Speaker 2: much to do with the running of these companies, probably
Speaker 2: as Larry Fink does with the companies that he owns.
Speaker 2: He's got a lot of companies that are there, but
Speaker 2: he's got other people who are operating in And that
Speaker 2: was the whole point of Brian Shall Hobby's investigation or
Speaker 2: not investigation, but his point bringing that up about a
Speaker 2: month or so ago. And now Wall Street Journal and
Speaker 2: other people are saying, how does he have the time
Speaker 2: to play video games and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 2: You know, the investors are looking at it. I think that,
Speaker 2: you know, it's important from the standpoint that people think
Speaker 2: that Elon Musk is a genius who is running all
Speaker 2: these companies simultaneously. And I've seen articles saying, oh yeah,
Speaker 2: when he wanted to do Rocket Launch, he contacted the
Speaker 2: guy who was an expert and got a book from
Speaker 2: him and he read it all and he memorized it all.
Speaker 2: It's like he's designing it or something. He's not designing
Speaker 2: this stuff. He's not that hands on. That's the point.
Speaker 2: And so it's part of the legend of Elon Musk,
Speaker 2: which I'm more than happy to throw some real mud on.
Speaker 2: He's legends. And then he says, and by the way,
Speaker 2: Musk is Saraman Musk, and Trump is Saron Musk. Trump
Speaker 2: can take Musk's money anytime he chooses, and he can
Speaker 2: lock him away on a whim. Musk is like a
Speaker 2: rothschild mountains of cash but no power. Well, I just like,
Speaker 2: you know, Saron Musk because it sounds like Elon Musk,
Speaker 2: and so I'll probably continue to call him Saraon Musk.
Speaker 2: But and I guess also because you know, in a
Speaker 2: sense he is you know, Trump is really about taking
Speaker 2: the money right and getting the power and getting his
Speaker 2: name on things.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 2: Again, I know that at some point they're going to
Speaker 2: rename the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of Trump, maybe
Speaker 2: after he dies, but they'll be naming everything after. But
Speaker 2: you know, he wants his name on everything, and he
Speaker 2: wants the money. All these politicians in Washington want the money,
Speaker 2: and that's what gives the people of money that kind
Speaker 2: of power. But when I talk about Elon Musk being
Speaker 2: Sarron Musk, it is not simply because it sounds better.
Speaker 2: It sounds more like Elon, But I think it's because
Speaker 2: he really is into this dark stuff. You know, Trump
Speaker 2: is like a boss hog politician who wants money and
Speaker 2: power or in his name, on everything. Elon Musk wants us.
Speaker 2: He wants to summon the demons on us right, whether
Speaker 2: there's artificial intelligence or whether there's a singularity. He wants
Speaker 2: to demand that we join with the machines. He wants
Speaker 2: to probe our minds with brain computer interfaces. He wants
Speaker 2: to enslave us with universal basic income. He's the one
Speaker 2: that's got the ideas in this because it's something that
Speaker 2: has been ingrained in his family multi generations. His grandfather
Speaker 2: jumping on board with HG. Wells and these other people
Speaker 2: pushing technocracy in Canada, trying to get rid of their
Speaker 2: representative government there. They brought him up on charges, they
Speaker 2: didn't convict him, so he left and he went to
Speaker 2: South Africa. But this is why Elon Musk's family is
Speaker 2: so heavily into the occult and into technocracy, and that's
Speaker 2: why I talk about him, you know, being sourn It
Speaker 2: is a very dark, very dark what he's doing. Then
Speaker 2: this was sent to me by Bert and he says,
Speaker 2: one La fire is Arson, the Kenneth fire. Here's a
Speaker 2: report where they interviewed neighbors there that saw this guy
Speaker 2: who can only speak a little bit of English, mostly Spanish,
Speaker 2: and he had a propane tank and a blowtorch setting fires.
Speaker 5: And apparently it was folks there in Woodland Hills that
Speaker 5: earlier today noticed this person acting suspicious and made what
Speaker 5: you might consider a citizen's arrest.
Speaker 1: Listen to one of the people involved in that.
Speaker 7: Hey, Mom and I were sitting up in our backyard
Speaker 7: in the house here, and all of a sudden, I
Speaker 7: hear a car come to a screeching halt, and the
Speaker 7: guy is running out saying stop, stop, drop what you're holding,
Speaker 7: Drop what you're holding. And then next thing we hear
Speaker 7: is him yelling neighbors, neighbors, he's trying to start a fire.
Speaker 7: Call nine one one, Call nine one one.
Speaker 1: My mom ran out in.
Speaker 7: Her bathroom ready to fight the guy, and all of
Speaker 7: the neighbors started coming out calling nine one one. We
Speaker 7: really bounded together as a group. A few generalmen in
Speaker 7: the neighborhood had detained him. They had surrounded him, gotten
Speaker 7: him on his knees, and then they got some zip
Speaker 7: ties and my stepdad came out with some rope and
Speaker 7: we were able to do a citizens or rest and
Speaker 7: detain him until the police had arrived. He had a
Speaker 7: like a propane tank or a big yellow tank, like
Speaker 7: a flamethrower basically, and the neighbor said that he saw
Speaker 7: the guy behind a van trying to light something on fire.
Speaker 7: The guy looked like he was in his mid twenties.
Speaker 7: He said that he had a blow torch to smoke
Speaker 7: marijuana because he couldn't afford a lighter. He spoke for
Speaker 7: a lot of Spanish, but did speak some English as well.
Speaker 7: We had some Spanish speaking neighbors that were able to
Speaker 7: translate and help us out. He did seem an altered state, though.
Speaker 7: We were just so happy that law enforcement came so quickly.
Speaker 7: Was such a huge response. They came from all sides,
Speaker 7: just in case the guy tried to get away, and
Speaker 7: it really was a valiant effort. They did their due
Speaker 7: diligence and I hope the detectives can put this case
Speaker 7: to rest.
Speaker 5: Yeah, that a great job done by those folks in
Speaker 5: Woodland Hills today. While the fire is out tonight, there
Speaker 5: were some frightening moments earlier today as those flames spread
Speaker 5: very quickly, forced evacuations early on.
Speaker 1: The scared residents you could see it on their faces.
Speaker 5: They came streaming out, many of them carrying their pets,
Speaker 5: dragging suitcases that were filled with their personal belongings. But
Speaker 5: the firefighters were able to get in there pretty quickly.
Speaker 5: Those water dropping helicopters had a huge impact. Along with
Speaker 5: the hand crews. They made some quick work. The winds
Speaker 5: picked up from here and there, but calmed down finally
Speaker 5: they were able to really jump in there. And tonight,
Speaker 5: as I mentioned, the flames are out.
Speaker 2: Well, I have some questions about that. Well, look at it,
Speaker 2: and that's a pretty big fire. And I didn't see
Speaker 2: any fire damage around that area where the guy had
Speaker 2: been apprehended. Did they take him to another area after
Speaker 2: they hog tied him or something like that, you know,
Speaker 2: I mean he was hog tied there. But you know,
Speaker 2: I think you're going to see a lot of copycat arson.
Speaker 2: It still doesn't tell us exactly how this started. I
Speaker 2: think you're going to see that this has inspired a
Speaker 2: lot of people, some miscreants as well as immigrants like
Speaker 2: this guy who've come across the border who hate this
Speaker 2: country and want to damage I make it even You've
Speaker 2: got other countries where they are releasing criminals and that
Speaker 2: are just you know, they're just nuts. They don't really
Speaker 2: necessarily have a motive. Or you got others who are
Speaker 2: working for the government, like the government of Venezuela. You
Speaker 2: know that guy who was doing the the home invasions
Speaker 2: and squatting on things, and he was working for the
Speaker 2: Venezuelan and government or had in the past part of
Speaker 2: the Venezuelan intelligence organization. And probably they're just like you
Speaker 2: don't get out of it. You're still working for them,
Speaker 2: no matter how they sheep people. But again, we still
Speaker 2: don't know anything about the cause of the fire, what
Speaker 2: happened with it. We have a lot of people believe
Speaker 2: it's directed energy weapons. As they said in Hawaii, there's
Speaker 2: not anything that I can validate one way or the other.
Speaker 2: What we need to work look at is how this
Speaker 2: is going to be used. And I think there's no
Speaker 2: question as to whether this is organic or whether this
Speaker 2: was done by the government that they're going to use
Speaker 2: it to push their smart city agenda. They're talking about
Speaker 2: how the area is now we should not build back there,
Speaker 2: you know, we've got to We're going to make it
Speaker 2: so that we're going to lay the foundation so that
Speaker 2: any fire that happens, natural or arson or directed energy weapons,
Speaker 2: whatever it is, they're not going to be able to
Speaker 2: put it out. And the insurance companies could see that coming.
Speaker 2: The insurance companies got out and now they're saying, well,
Speaker 2: who's going to insure this, Well, nobody, So we got
Speaker 2: to make sure that people don't build there. That kind
Speaker 2: of paternalism, but it's all really about making La a
Speaker 2: smart city and locking people down into that. There was
Speaker 2: also another example of arson as well. This is again
Speaker 2: a copycat type of thing. It's not one of the
Speaker 2: major blazes that were there, But this is a bunch
Speaker 2: of people. I don't know if they were homeless, if
Speaker 2: they are immigrants or whatever, but they just get together.
Speaker 2: So are they're going to start a big fire.
Speaker 6: We're at three zero two Pico and people are lighting fires.
Speaker 6: Now you can see that lit a fire. These guys,
Speaker 6: not all the people there, but some of those guys
Speaker 6: lit that fire, and these guys are they're actually the
Speaker 6: trees caught fire and then the palms are catching fire.
Speaker 1: So civilians are now lighting.
Speaker 6: Fires down in the so called you know, you know,
Speaker 6: flats around Santa Monica, Venice. So he's safe out there.
Speaker 6: Fire department's been just patched. We don't have enough water
Speaker 6: to put this thing out.
Speaker 2: We're supposed to be on the way, yeah, exactly, So
Speaker 2: we don't have any water to put it out, but
Speaker 2: hopefully they're going to be on the way. We call
Speaker 2: the police to get these people, but these are copycat things.
Speaker 2: This is still doesn't get us to the source of
Speaker 2: the fire. North American House Hippos says, I want to
Speaker 2: know what Doge will have to say about aerospace contractors,
Speaker 2: and they're inflated invoices, you know, people like Elon Musk
Speaker 2: for example, as well as green grifting and subsidies for
Speaker 2: expensive electric cars. Well, now he's seen the light, Elon Musk,
Speaker 2: after he got every last dime of the EVE subsidies,
Speaker 2: he's now seen the light. And we can't have that
Speaker 2: anymore because that would be going to his competitors, So
Speaker 2: we're going to stop that. We're going to stop that
Speaker 2: now for his competitors. Atomic Dog says, help David Knight
Speaker 2: spread the truth across the Fruited Plains by liking the
Speaker 2: video and sharing on social media, and it helps. Thank
Speaker 2: you so much for reminding me. Yes, please do please
Speaker 2: like the video, please share it. That's a big help.
Speaker 2: Do not obey says I'll never comply with a public
Speaker 2: health order even if the bird flu joins forces with HIV,
Speaker 2: monkey pocks and COVID to become a Marvel comic supervirus.
Speaker 2: That's good. Yeah, the League of Fear that they have
Speaker 2: going on there instead of justice, Octo Spook campaign donations
Speaker 2: are criminal payments and bribes. That's right. They are advanced.
Speaker 2: It's an advanced auction of stolen goods. That's what an
Speaker 2: election is. And just you want to look on a
Speaker 2: metric for how corrupt Washington has we come, just look
Speaker 2: at the astronomical amounts that have been spent for all
Speaker 2: the elections, but especially for the presidential election. Just going
Speaker 2: back to the year two thousand, only one hundred million
Speaker 2: dollars for George W. Bush and seventy million dollars for
Speaker 2: and look at it now. You know, just in the
Speaker 2: short couple of months that Lala was running, she got
Speaker 2: a billion dollars and she still wound up twenty million
Speaker 2: dollars in debt. That does that work? North of Merritton House,
Speaker 2: Sopho says, I was irritated when David mentioned this business
Speaker 2: about Rumble last week. I have been successful in sending
Speaker 2: him cash app contributions, so I'll do that from now on. Well,
Speaker 2: thank you very much. I appreciate that. And we have
Speaker 2: you know, a little bit of a plug here if
Speaker 2: people want to send us contributions via zell and we
Speaker 2: have also on the website the po box where you
Speaker 2: can send things. And by the way, I didn't do
Speaker 2: this yesterday and I was remissing doing it. Let me
Speaker 2: thank the people have sent checks to the post office.
Speaker 2: Marty again, who's done the matching funds. Thank you so much,
Speaker 2: Marty W. David W. Matthew H. David and Susie S.
Speaker 2: Minor Mike, and thank you for your note, Minor Mike.
Speaker 2: We will take you up on that offer of matching
Speaker 2: funds later in this year. Steve S. Tom and Nancy K.
Speaker 2: Longtime listeners and longtime supporters. Thank you so much for
Speaker 2: the contribution as well as for the book, and they
Speaker 2: sent me drawings that their children have none. I think
Speaker 2: this is a pretty good likeness of me, their children,
Speaker 2: Sammy and Abbey. Not sure which one did this, but
Speaker 2: it says David Night Show right there, and so thank
Speaker 2: you very much. They've reordered their lives to follow God
Speaker 2: and to teach their children, and I really I know
Speaker 2: that God will bless that, and it's always good to
Speaker 2: hear from them and to find out what is happening
Speaker 2: in their family. We're going to take a quick break
Speaker 2: and we.
Speaker 8: Will be right back, excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Yet Laus
Speaker 8: from annual Global Risk Report makes for a stunning and
Speaker 8: sobering read for the global business community. The top concern
Speaker 8: for the next two years is not conflict or climate.
Speaker 8: It is disinformation and misinformation for not closely by polarization
Speaker 8: within our societies.
Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. You are listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Isn't it amazing to see the desperation of increasing the war,
Speaker 2: the death and the destruction with the Ukraine War, and
Speaker 2: of course others that they're going to be jumping into.
Speaker 2: We have an interesting update here from a YouTube channel
Speaker 2: called Warzone Echo, and they give an example of how
Speaker 2: if you're just going to throw equipment at people and
Speaker 2: you're not going to do any training. This is one
Speaker 2: of the reasons why the Ukrainian positions are collapsing so rapidly.
Speaker 2: This was an elite organization that got some of the
Speaker 2: best equipment, they said, and they just collapsed.
Speaker 4: Our first stop is puck rofs Kick, where Ukraine's shiny,
Speaker 4: freshly trained NATO brigade, the one hundred and fifty fifth
Speaker 4: Mechanized Brigade, had a debut that, let's just say, didn't
Speaker 4: go as planned. As Colonel Douglas McGregor often highlights sending
Speaker 4: underprepared troops into battle without robust training as a recipe
Speaker 4: for disaster.
Speaker 1: Let's unpack the details.
Speaker 4: This brigade, trained in France and equipped with Western weaponry,
Speaker 4: was supposed to showcase the pinnacle of native Ukrainian collaboration. Instead,
Speaker 4: what we witnessed was a complete collapse. Out of three
Speaker 4: thousand troops, Ony seven hundred fled the battlefield after facing
Speaker 4: Russian forces for the first time. Imagine this, over two
Speaker 4: thirds of a brigade gone. The sheer scale of this
Speaker 4: desertion cannot be overstated. According to Ukrainian sources, the collapse
Speaker 4: wasn't just about fear. It was also about leadership. The
Speaker 4: brigades's commander was fired immediately after the battle, while a
Speaker 4: battalion leader, overcome by stress, died of a heart attack
Speaker 4: on the field. This wasn't a battlefield tragedy. It was
Speaker 4: a leadership disaster. And when leadership fails, morale follows. Why
Speaker 4: did this happen? The answer lies in the brigades preparation,
Speaker 4: or lack thereof. Reports indicate that many of these soldiers
Speaker 4: were civilians pressed into service. They had less than two
Speaker 4: weeks of training before being sent to Pokrofski. Picture someone
Speaker 4: who's never held a rifle suddenly facing Russian artillery and
Speaker 4: experienced troops. It's not courage that's missing, its basic survival skills.
Speaker 4: Let's not forget the contexts. Pakrovski is a hot zone.
Speaker 4: Russia's forces here are seasoned, equipped, and strategically positioned. This
Speaker 4: isn't a place for half prepared soldiers with new gear
Speaker 4: they barely know how to use. Even with advanced native weapons.
Speaker 4: Poorly trained troops are no match for a determined, well
Speaker 4: organized adversary. This event underscores a critical flaw in Western
Speaker 4: military strategy in Ukraine, Providing state of the art equipment
Speaker 4: is meaningless without the training and discipline to use it effectively.
Speaker 4: Colonel Douglas McGregor has repeatedly pointed out that wars are
Speaker 4: not won by technology alone, but by the soldiers wielding it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and we have seen that over and over again,
Speaker 2: and they've said that from the very beginning, said, oh,
Speaker 2: you're going to send them a lot of tanks, Well,
Speaker 2: how are they going to use them? Do they know
Speaker 2: how to use them as a coordinated movement? And does
Speaker 2: anybody know that the tanks by themselves are really not
Speaker 2: that effective. They have to be a component of a
Speaker 2: larger battle group, and those components are not even there.
Speaker 2: But of course nobody has been trained in how to
Speaker 2: use them and the tactics that they have developed in
Speaker 2: the US, so they're simply throwing weapons at him. That
Speaker 2: was analysis and report by war Zone Echo. I don't
Speaker 2: know if he's referring to the extra reverb that he's
Speaker 2: got on. There was a lot of echo that wasn't there.
Speaker 2: I didn't put that on there. But then he also
Speaker 2: has this quote from from retired on what his rink
Speaker 2: is McGregor, Douglas McGregor. I forget what his rank was,
Speaker 2: but here's what he has to say. This is more
Speaker 2: like a World War One battlefield.
Speaker 9: Once you have networked, integrated all of the overhead surveillance,
Speaker 9: manned unmanned sensors from the ground all the way into space,
Speaker 9: with all of your strike systems. And the Russians historically
Speaker 9: have always had enormous numbers of strike systems.
Speaker 2: I'll go about anything beyond line of sight.
Speaker 9: Once those are networked, do you make it impossible for
Speaker 9: your enemy unless the enemy has substantial air and missile
Speaker 9: defenses to really move. It makes maneuver almost impossible. That's
Speaker 9: what the Russians have done in Ukraine. So hopefully, you know,
Speaker 9: people will listen to President Trump and understand just how
Speaker 9: terrible the mortality this battlefield is.
Speaker 2: But I don't think they will.
Speaker 9: I think this is going to go on and on
Speaker 9: and on until twenty January, and then the real question
Speaker 9: is can he rein in this rogue deep state, which
Speaker 9: consists largely of the intelligence communities and their supporters and
Speaker 9: especially on the Hill.
Speaker 4: Welcome back to the channel.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, and look at this. Is he going
Speaker 2: to be able to get the rogue people who started
Speaker 2: this stuff the CIA in line? Who was running who
Speaker 2: In the first Trump administration, you know, he would talk
Speaker 2: all the time about how he got led into the
Speaker 2: Iraq war, lies about weapons of mass destruction, where those
Speaker 2: lives are based on torture, and those lies were those
Speaker 2: lies developed from torture were taken to people by Gena
Speaker 2: Haspell that Trump put in charge of the CIA, and
Speaker 2: she did a cover up of the torture and then
Speaker 2: she sold the lies to people in previous administrations. And
Speaker 2: as far as I'm concerned, she was running the CIA
Speaker 2: the entire time, because she definitely was the director the
Speaker 2: last couple of years, but the first couple of years,
Speaker 2: David pomp Mike Pompeio was supposedly in charge of the CIA,
Speaker 2: but she was a deputy directorship. But she was somebody
Speaker 2: who knew how technically, how the whole thing was set up.
Speaker 2: He was just a politician. And then he got moved
Speaker 2: to the State Department and they moved her to the
Speaker 2: head of the CIA. But I think she was running
Speaker 2: it the entire time. So is Trump going to push
Speaker 2: back against the CIA people? Are they pulling his strings?
Speaker 2: I think that's what is happening. I think it's the
Speaker 2: latter people talking about Rumble and what I had to
Speaker 2: say twelve June seventeen seventy six. So it appears the
Speaker 2: best way to support the DK show is not through
Speaker 2: Rumble but direct then paid in full. That is a
Speaker 2: better way, I think, because I'm not really sure what's
Speaker 2: going to happen with the Rumble format. We're getting a
Speaker 2: lot of strange stuff from it. Doug A. Legg says,
Speaker 2: I swear Rumble cuts out when I turn on DK.
Speaker 2: The random internet failures that we get on Rock Fin,
Speaker 2: he says, it's a total bs. So unfortunately the platforms
Speaker 2: we have to use now we are on Odyssey and
Speaker 2: the person who gave us a lot of tips that
Speaker 2: I read yesterday back on December the twenty second, I said,
Speaker 2: and I just got around reading them on air, and
Speaker 2: we just got around to looking at them and follow
Speaker 2: up he said, yeah, move to Odyssey. It's more secure.
Speaker 2: Our t is moving there. It really is a true
Speaker 2: free speech platform. I know someone from Info Wars who
Speaker 2: used to do technical stuff there who is now at Odyssey,
Speaker 2: and so we may wind up doing I think a
Speaker 2: direct broadcast. That we're going to look into it and
Speaker 2: see if we can't have a facility there where people
Speaker 2: can leave tips. He looked into it, and he said
Speaker 2: their fee structure is better as well. You know, there's
Speaker 2: fees for all the different places, and of course there's
Speaker 2: I understand that that there's a cost of bandwidth all
Speaker 2: the rest of that stuff, and they need to make
Speaker 2: a living as well, So I don't begrudge them the fees,
Speaker 2: but it's just how it's collected and whether or not
Speaker 2: it's paid. That's the other issue as well. Dougle Luck says,
Speaker 2: I'm watching on my computer, but I'm listening through my
Speaker 2: phone because the phone doesn't cut out. That's interesting and
Speaker 2: you know, and I can understand too that if if
Speaker 2: that's growing pains. But what I don't understand is the
Speaker 2: fact that they would have people who have followed the
Speaker 2: broadcast unfollowed the broadcast. That's very concerning. And I just
Speaker 2: saw that Brian and v McCartney. I have my phone
Speaker 2: on too for when the iPad cuts out. Uh, Kowalamo says,
Speaker 2: dougalug try Odyssey or d live, Yeah, Odyssey, now d live.
Speaker 2: We were on d life for a while and for
Speaker 2: a short period of time, and they demonetized us, you know,
Speaker 2: after January the City and that was at the very beginning.
Speaker 2: It was d live and it was another one, uh
Speaker 2: that the other one, I remember what it was. We
Speaker 2: had it in our commercial there, I think the old commercial.
Speaker 2: But the other live platform that we were on just
Speaker 2: completely banned me, and d live demonetized us because they
Speaker 2: got there was criticism from the mainstream media. They said,
Speaker 2: look at this, You've got this insurrection on January the sixth,
Speaker 2: which it wasn't and some of these people were live
Speaker 2: streaming this on d live and the other platform and
Speaker 2: they got paid to do it. That's an outrage. And
Speaker 2: so you know, the one platform just banned all political
Speaker 2: content and the other one demonetized all political content, and
Speaker 2: that was DLive that demonetized that. But Odyssey, we will
Speaker 2: be doing more with Odyssey.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 2: Denver Adaway says Nienard is a noun singular a person
Speaker 2: that is so retarded. In order for them to be
Speaker 2: told they are ret it must be said in their
Speaker 2: own language. I don't know if that's a legitimate word
Speaker 2: or not, or if it's not, that's a really good definition,
Speaker 2: I guess. But North American house, if I like the
Speaker 2: way David amended MAGA to make amnesia great again, you know,
Speaker 2: let's forget everything that Trump did four years ago. That's
Speaker 2: just over with. Yeah, well he's going to do it again,
Speaker 2: and he's going to do it worse because he's not
Speaker 2: going to have to get your approval this next time. Trovo.
Speaker 2: That was it Trovo? Thank you? Yeah, it was Trovo.
Speaker 2: They were the ones who just completely banned all political content,
Speaker 2: including us. So angry Tiger Elon Musk is setting up
Speaker 2: his own crypto platform where he tells you that he
Speaker 2: will double your crypto. As he's making the speech, he
Speaker 2: uses this the word scheme. Yeah. Nancy Chambers went to
Speaker 2: the bank to get one hundred dollars bills and was
Speaker 2: told that I had to take most in lower denominations.
Speaker 2: The teller had to share one hundred dollars with another customer.
Speaker 2: S h sr E. I'm as that supposed to be share?
Speaker 2: I guess. Yeah. They want cash to become difficult, and
Speaker 2: that's part of what's happening with the coins octo spook.
Speaker 2: When they need the power of whole nuclear power plants
Speaker 2: to support digital money, it would seem that printing money
Speaker 2: would be no more expensive. Oh, it's not about the expense,
Speaker 2: and it's not about the power. They will spare no expense,
Speaker 2: whether it's power or money to have a surveillance state.
Speaker 2: They will have us living a subsistence life. That would
Speaker 2: suit them just fine. But they're going to give first
Speaker 2: priority to AI because See, the thing that AI brings
Speaker 2: to the party is not you know, being able to
Speaker 2: do you know, animation and things like that. Hey, the
Speaker 2: purpose of AI is to propagandaze us and to surveil us,
Speaker 2: but it is also to be able to do data mining.
Speaker 2: You know. They put the information that they have collected
Speaker 2: so much information on us and are doing it all
Speaker 2: the time. They need to have AI pull it together
Speaker 2: and make sense of it for them, and so they
Speaker 2: need the massive computing power to automate the analysis of
Speaker 2: the data to data mine what they have got on us.
Speaker 2: I mean, they've been collecting data on all of us
Speaker 2: for decades and storing it on these massive computers like
Speaker 2: the one that the NSA's got out in Bluffdale, Utah,
Speaker 2: out in the middle of the desert, massive consuming of
Speaker 2: electricity as well as water in the middle of the desert.
Speaker 2: And they've got another one on the east coast around
Speaker 2: the Washington area. And they're just saving everything. And as
Speaker 2: computer power is getting better and better, and as they
Speaker 2: bring in artificial intelligence, they will mine that stuff and
Speaker 2: put it together. That's what it's always they've been saving
Speaker 2: it for the future when the computer power catches up.
Speaker 2: It's the same way as when you know, the nineteen
Speaker 2: sixties and jcr Licklider said, let's create the Internet, right, Well,
Speaker 2: they didn't have the technical capability to do it. That
Speaker 2: didn't come around until the nineteen nineties. And then they
Speaker 2: jumped into it in a big way. They had the
Speaker 2: CIA created its own venture capital firm, and all these
Speaker 2: people in the intelligence community put people on the boards
Speaker 2: of these firms, and then they provide that stuff for
Speaker 2: free for many years everybody. And then because now they've
Speaker 2: got a lot of ads and other things like that,
Speaker 2: they've now monetized it and they're now making a lot
Speaker 2: of money. But for years, the whole thing was being
Speaker 2: paid for by the federal government because they were setting
Speaker 2: up a massive web to trap us, a massive net
Speaker 2: to ensnare us, and they have been saving all of
Speaker 2: this information and they're going to start mining it with
Speaker 2: the artificial intelligence. That's what's really concerning about it. But
Speaker 2: again we're not going to operate from a point of view.
Speaker 2: We're going to talk about that coming up here. Nabureau
Speaker 2: twenty twenty nine. Mystery fires like the commifournias won't stop
Speaker 2: after transhumanist Trump takes office. They'll only become the norm
Speaker 2: and more numerous. Well, I agree, I agree, and there's
Speaker 2: a lot of different reasons for that. I mean, there
Speaker 2: is deliberate to the extent and has been going on
Speaker 2: for so long that I think this whole thing about
Speaker 2: how the forestry situations operating, how they don't take out
Speaker 2: the dead wood and everything. I think, you know, once
Speaker 2: in competence goes on for so long and reaches a
Speaker 2: certain level, you've got to say that it's malicious. There's
Speaker 2: maliciousness there. There's it all folds together into their plans,
Speaker 2: and I don't think it's an accident. I don't think
Speaker 2: it's coincidence either. A Syrian girl with all the insane
Speaker 2: people in our country today. I'm very afraid that there
Speaker 2: will be lots of compucat harshness. I agree, just like shootings.
Speaker 2: You know, you've got some shootings that are you know,
Speaker 2: created with the MK ultra of whatever, people that are
Speaker 2: hyped up. I really do think the Aurora, Colorado shooting
Speaker 2: falls into that, and then you got other people who
Speaker 2: just copy it right, And then of course there's a
Speaker 2: satanic aspect of that as well, I think. And there's
Speaker 2: octospoop dope. Smokers here in New Mexico always use propane
Speaker 2: blow torches. I guess that's why they call it blow No,
Speaker 2: I guess there wasn't that. I think that's cocaine, that's
Speaker 2: blow or something. Is it anyway? Blow to We don't know. Well,
Speaker 2: I've heard these phrases somewhere, but I've never been a
Speaker 2: part of that culture. Fortunately. Yeah, it's so much cheaper
Speaker 2: to get a propane blowtorch then to get a lighter
Speaker 2: Mark young g. I wonder why the people hate this country.
Speaker 2: Maybe because we killed millions and we start wars all
Speaker 2: over the planet. Guard Goldsmith iron heel. That was what
Speaker 2: the listener that was talking about earlier. He says, Iron
Speaker 2: Heel is a dystopian novella good stuff from Jack London's
Speaker 2: populist socialist point of view, which seems slightly like William
Speaker 2: Jennings Bryant's opposition to Eastern corporate power. Interesting story. We
Speaker 2: was banned by the Leninist Stalinist Gang, but it got
Speaker 2: published in France then orwell read it as did Iron Rand.
Speaker 2: In fact, we everyone is a number, and we everyone
Speaker 2: is a number, much like the prisoner. Well there we go. Yeah,
Speaker 2: there's so much stuff that I want to read that
Speaker 2: I won't have time to get to. Probably in my lifetime.
Speaker 2: I do a lot of reading, but it's now shallow
Speaker 2: stuff like this.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 2: I'm glad I had time to read the other stuff
Speaker 2: in the past. But occasionally we get in and do
Speaker 2: some stuff. And I would like to do some shows
Speaker 2: that are going to be a deep dive on a
Speaker 2: particular topic rather than just going through what is happening
Speaker 2: with current events. A Syrian girl. Didn't Saron start his
Speaker 2: career as a servant of melcor the powerful evil fallen angel.
Speaker 2: I think Saron must still works. Jeb Clanton, thank you
Speaker 2: for the tip on rock Fan. Appreciate that says Trump
Speaker 2: and Obama like each other. Now, that's right. Wonder how
Speaker 2: the Trumpers are handling that? Isn't that interesting? You know,
Speaker 2: I didn't look to see the reactions of people like
Speaker 2: Tempoole or Laura Lomer. How does she like that?
Speaker 5: You know?
Speaker 2: It seems like it seems like Donald Trump is as
Speaker 2: friendly with Obama as he was with Laura Lumer or
Speaker 2: maybe not, you not that friendly. I don't know. Guard Coldsmith,
Speaker 2: he says Odyssey is great. I hope more folks head over.
Speaker 2: I have to start doing streaming through it. Good people
Speaker 2: behind it, yes, are good people mind it, and I
Speaker 2: do trust them, and so you know, we we have
Speaker 2: we always put the program up there, but I don't
Speaker 2: know if it's streaming there now or not. I don't
Speaker 2: even know Travis set that stuff up, and he's not
Speaker 2: here right now so to ask. So I'm not sure
Speaker 2: if it's streaming there, but we will be streaming it
Speaker 2: and we may be able to take maybe able to
Speaker 2: take tips there at Odyssey as well. And yeah, I
Speaker 2: read that one from Jeb Clanton. Yes, thank you. Karen
Speaker 2: was trying to draw that to my attention, but yeah,
Speaker 2: we did that, and so we're going to take a
Speaker 2: quick break and we will be right back.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Welcome Back. K s O. L five eighty five says,
Speaker 2: the advantage of Rumble is that you can watch the
Speaker 2: show on our Roku TV. Well, that's good. We were
Speaker 2: on Roku and we got banned off of not Roku,
Speaker 2: but we got banned off of the platform that was
Speaker 2: feeding it. The people who set it up for us
Speaker 2: set it up on Vimeo, and we said, well, we
Speaker 2: know the Vimeo is going to ban us pretty quickly,
Speaker 2: because they've already banned me once before when I was
Speaker 2: at Info Wars and they said, well, it's just a
Speaker 2: temporary thing a couple of months. Well it turned out
Speaker 2: it wasn't temporary, and turns out that we didn't make it,
Speaker 2: but just a couple of months before they banned us
Speaker 2: on Vimeo as well. But that's good to know that
Speaker 2: you can get on Roku TV through Rumble. That's good. Well.
Speaker 2: I spoke yesterday about the outrage rightfully, so I think
Speaker 2: of people against tattoo artists, who was saying, this is crazy.
Speaker 2: This kid comes and once nine years old and once
Speaker 2: a tattoo of Trump on her neck, he said, I
Speaker 2: talked her out of it. I said, you know, come
Speaker 2: back later when you're a little bit older and everything.
Speaker 2: And then I talked her out of that, and she
Speaker 2: did come back, and she came back with her parents
Speaker 2: because she had to come back with her parents. And
Speaker 2: he got wound up talking her into an American flag
Speaker 2: instead of Trump, instead of a person that she made
Speaker 2: not like in some point in the future. But a
Speaker 2: lot of people are saying, what does it matter with
Speaker 2: you tattooing a child anyway? And I said, look at
Speaker 2: the outrage of this. And I've talked about the fact
Speaker 2: that you can't tattoo a miner, anybody under eighteen in
Speaker 2: any of the fifty states, end of story, unless and
Speaker 2: a few of them you've got the the printal consent.
Speaker 2: And that was the case. This guy was in Arizona
Speaker 2: and the family, the parents had taken their kid to
Speaker 2: another state so they could get this tattoo on them.
Speaker 2: And I look at that, It's like, so what excuse me?
Speaker 2: What was that about? Were the parents trying to virtue
Speaker 2: signal about how we love Trump and all the rest
Speaker 2: of this stuff? Was that what was really behind it?
Speaker 2: We like Trump so much? Look at this our daughter
Speaker 2: has got a tattoo of trump on. I think that's
Speaker 2: a lot of what is happening with the trans stuff.
Speaker 2: But as I pointed out before, you know, there's so
Speaker 2: many things that we don't let miners do when it
Speaker 2: comes to tattoos. That's just one of them. But of
Speaker 2: course a tattoo can be removed at some point in time.
Speaker 2: If she grew up and didn't like that, she could
Speaker 2: remove that. But you're not going to be able to
Speaker 2: undo genital mutilation or masectomies, or chemical sterilization or any
Speaker 2: of these other monstrous things that they're doing to children.
Speaker 2: And you know JK. Rowling, who wrote the Harry Potter stories,
Speaker 2: she is completely on the other side of us, whether
Speaker 2: it comes to politics or when it comes to spirituality,
Speaker 2: but she is outraged by this transgender stuff. She tweeted,
Speaker 2: there are no trans kids. No child is quote born
Speaker 2: in the wrong body unquote. There are only adults like
Speaker 2: you who are prepared to sacrifice the health of miners
Speaker 2: to bolster your belief in an ideology that will end
Speaker 2: up wreaking more harm than lobotomies and false memory syndrome combined.
Speaker 2: And I've compared it to that many times with my
Speaker 2: family they said, you know, you look at lobotomies and
Speaker 2: you know, the Kennedy's did that to one of their daughters,
Speaker 2: and people realized how horrific that was. But it was
Speaker 2: a couple of years where they were doing that on
Speaker 2: a regular basis and it became a part of the
Speaker 2: story of one flu over the Cuckoo's Nest. And so
Speaker 2: you know, when you look at this, I think it
Speaker 2: is going to be remembered by that. People are going
Speaker 2: to say, how in the world did we ever have
Speaker 2: a society where children were mutilated like this? And in
Speaker 2: the UK, the Liberal UK, they're pulling back from it. Tavistock,
Speaker 2: where there were this stuff was centered, is now being
Speaker 2: shut down everything, but not in the United States because
Speaker 2: of planned parenthood and others. And you know, she has
Speaker 2: spoken out on this many times. I remember, you know,
Speaker 2: one of the places that I've relied on significantly to
Speaker 2: get virtual instruments was a spitfire audio. One of the
Speaker 2: co found of that, Christian Hinson, and when she said
Speaker 2: something about transgender kids, he retweeted it and said, I
Speaker 2: agree with that. He goes it's coming for your kids,
Speaker 2: and he said and if your kids have autism, it's
Speaker 2: already at your front door. And he got kicked out
Speaker 2: of the company that he co founded because of that statement.
Speaker 2: But he was absolutely right, absolutely right, because especially for
Speaker 2: the when you look at the fact that they're focusing
Speaker 2: on kids with autism, because this is about deception, is
Speaker 2: really an evil pedophile like manipulation so they can mutilate
Speaker 2: these kids. It's based on, you know, pushing forward this ideology,
Speaker 2: but it's more than that. I really do believe that
Speaker 2: it is demonic and so you know, these kids, when
Speaker 2: you look at the tattoo issue, do they know what
Speaker 2: they want? Is it something that they're going to be
Speaker 2: happy with the rest of their life because it can't
Speaker 2: be changed. When it's the gender mutilation, the tattoo could
Speaker 2: even be changed, but they don't have the maturity to
Speaker 2: know that they're going to do something like that. And
Speaker 2: that is the case in so many different areas, she said,
Speaker 2: kids are watching TikTok videos of surgeons selling the idea
Speaker 2: that bodies can be modified like lego. Schools affirm kids'
Speaker 2: trans identities behind the backs of their parents. A certain
Speaker 2: kid's charity in the UK sent out breastbinders to pubescent
Speaker 2: girls without parental consent. Many parents are struggling to protect
Speaker 2: kids from a zeitgeist that is telling them that anxieties
Speaker 2: about puberty, sexuality, and growing up can be fixed by
Speaker 2: lifelong reliance on big pharma and by doctors who make
Speaker 2: Frankenstein look ethical. Well, she nailed it. The interesting thing
Speaker 2: is this article, which for the most part seems to
Speaker 2: pose this, and the final conclusion did. But it's awkward
Speaker 2: the way it was phrase. I thought, were they actually
Speaker 2: supporting some of this? They said, most children naturally outgrow
Speaker 2: their dysphoria as much as ninety eight percent of the time,
Speaker 2: So it means that two percent of these trans kids
Speaker 2: really are in the wrong body. I don't believe that
Speaker 2: at all. I said most children, not all, but most
Speaker 2: children diagnose with gender dysphoia actually suffer from rapid onset
Speaker 2: gender dyspoia. You can call it whatever you want. It's
Speaker 2: just lies in gas lighting. It's gas lighting. It's very
Speaker 2: easy to manipulate children. You can get children to believe
Speaker 2: that there's a Santa Claus. And these kids that are
Speaker 2: believe in Santa Claus are now being told that they're
Speaker 2: in the wrong body, and the parents that are doing
Speaker 2: this need to be investigated by a real organization, not
Speaker 2: by you know, these child trafficking government organizations that are
Speaker 2: out there. Contagion, she said, when it happens, these children
Speaker 2: are induced into gender dysphoia, either by propaganda or by
Speaker 2: abuse of adults, and it can be their parents. Kaya
Speaker 2: Clementine Breen, for example, the one who is suing one
Speaker 2: of the most well known experts in this, doctor Olson Kennedy,
Speaker 2: who heads the Center for trans Youth at LA Children's Hospital.
Speaker 2: I wonder if that burned up, it will someday. I'm
Speaker 2: not suggesting somebody, I'm just talking about what God will
Speaker 2: do to that. Kaya Clementine Breen had come to the
Speaker 2: hospital with a range of mental health conditions, some genetic
Speaker 2: and some stemming from sexual abuse. This so called doctor
Speaker 2: Olsen Kennedy had her diagnosed with gender dysphoia during her
Speaker 2: first visit, without conducting a mental health evaluation and without
Speaker 2: an assessment from a child psychologist. Look, it doesn't matter
Speaker 2: even if this child psychologists would verify this stuff. It
Speaker 2: is not true. Zero percent. No kids are in the
Speaker 2: wrong body. Instead, she was fast tracked onto a conveyor
Speaker 2: belt of irreversibly damaging puberty blockers at the age of twelve.
Speaker 2: They put her on cross sex hormones at the age
Speaker 2: of thirteen, and then they gave her surgery at the
Speaker 2: age of fourteen mutilation. And that's from her lawsuit. She
Speaker 2: is now suing Olsen. Kennedy accuses the transpredator in her
Speaker 2: colleagues of medical negligence. I agree with Rolling that there
Speaker 2: is no such thing as a transgender child, said doctor
Speaker 2: Simone Gold. And this is coming from the Gold Report.
Speaker 2: That's why I say it. It was awkwardly worded as
Speaker 2: if you know two percent of the kids who fall
Speaker 2: into this really are no there aren't any, she said.
Speaker 2: Kids are either pushed into transgenderism through rapid onset gender dysphoria,
Speaker 2: or they develop gender dysphoria on their own and they
Speaker 2: naturally outquote. Let's not give it a fancy name to
Speaker 2: legitimize us. I don't call it rapid onset genderness. For you,
Speaker 2: it's just pedophilia. It's just manipulation. Don't tell your parents' this,
Speaker 2: but you know it isn't It is not a condition.
Speaker 2: It's predatory. If a child is medically mutilated into becoming transgender,
Speaker 2: quote unquote, it is because of adult abusive adults. She
Speaker 2: added that she and Rolling are on opposite sides of
Speaker 2: the political spectrum, which demonstrates that medical mutilation is not
Speaker 2: a political issue. It's not It is a spiritual issue,
Speaker 2: and it is so bad that even even people who
Speaker 2: are anathetical to Christianity understand that. But you know, when
Speaker 2: you look at what is Christianity today, especially in Europe
Speaker 2: in Sweden, they're now closing churches in order to meet
Speaker 2: climate goals. How about that? You know we always said
Speaker 2: they're going to do climate lockdowns. Well let it begin
Speaker 2: with these churches, right, I guess this is the climate mcguffin.
Speaker 2: They shut the churches down for the code mcguffin. How
Speaker 2: they're going to do it for the climate mcgoffn. It
Speaker 2: includes historic churches from the Middle Ages, non essentral churches,
Speaker 2: because they're not essentral if they don't believe that they
Speaker 2: have anything to do. And of course, the new religion,
Speaker 2: you know, LGBT and transgenderism is a religion, absolutely is,
Speaker 2: But so is the Gaya stuff. Right, the climate religion,
Speaker 2: it's got its own commandments and all the rest of
Speaker 2: this stuff being enforced by the government. It's a government.
Speaker 2: The government has established a religion. That's what the climate
Speaker 2: stuff is. It's not science. Again, they don't want to
Speaker 2: show you their data. They hide their data, just like
Speaker 2: the the virologists and everything have hid their data. And
Speaker 2: so don't talk to me about it being science. It
Speaker 2: is a religion and they have a code of ethics,
Speaker 2: and they have commandments, and they have a worldview, and
Speaker 2: they have all this other stuff and they're going to
Speaker 2: force you to it. And the government is establishing that religion.
Speaker 2: So the Church of Sweden is closing down historic churches
Speaker 2: during the colder months of the year in order to
Speaker 2: meet it's climate agenda goals. The climate is more important
Speaker 2: to them than Christ. And this is exactly what that
Speaker 2: atheist Raush who works for the Brookings Institute was saying.
Speaker 2: He said, look, society's going to collapse if the Christians
Speaker 2: don't start following Jesus. Again, he's an atheist. He doesn't
Speaker 2: believe it, but he sees the fruit of it. Problem
Speaker 2: is you can't have the fruit without the root, and
Speaker 2: he knows that the root is Jesus Christ. And he's
Speaker 2: encouraging Christians to be Christian, but they won't have it
Speaker 2: in a lot of these churches. The Lutheran Nash Church
Speaker 2: of Sweden will close down seven churches on the island
Speaker 2: of Gotland, including historic churches from the Middle Ages, from
Speaker 2: October to May every year the vast majority of the year.
Speaker 2: A Swedish radio station reported that the churches in Gotland
Speaker 2: are heated with oil and will be affected by the
Speaker 2: closures due to the Church of Sweden's official climate roadmap.
Speaker 2: They don't have the Romans road They got the climate
Speaker 2: roadmap that seeks to eliminate the use of fossil fuels
Speaker 2: for heating by the end of twenty twenty seven. It
Speaker 2: is too expensive to switch to other energy sources for heating,
Speaker 2: they say, so we'll just shut the church down because
Speaker 2: first thing that's important is that we follow the climate rules.
Speaker 2: Second thing is that we've got to make money, So
Speaker 2: just shut the church down. Journalist Peter Emmanuelson said the
Speaker 2: Church of Sweden is very progressive. For example, some years
Speaker 2: ago they encouraged clergy to use gender neutral language when
Speaker 2: talking about God, despite the Bible being very clear that
Speaker 2: God is masculine. Now they are essentially engaging in climate lockdowns.
Speaker 2: He said, the woke climate cult religion is more important
Speaker 2: to them now than Christianity. And again, well, it's not Christianity,
Speaker 2: but it's Christ. It's Jesus Christ. They don't follow him
Speaker 2: at all. And again it's the atheist's saying, come on,
Speaker 2: this is you know, wake up and get a hold
Speaker 2: of what you need to do, and these churches won't
Speaker 2: do it. The Church of Sweden has been in decline
Speaker 2: for decades, going from ninety five percent of the population
Speaker 2: in nineteen seventy two to fifty three percent of the
Speaker 2: population in twenty twenty three. Although fifty percent of the
Speaker 2: population that are still members, only nineteen percent of those
Speaker 2: members declare themselves to be religious. So okay, if it's
Speaker 2: fifty percent and it's only about one fifth of them
Speaker 2: are religious, so that means that it's only ten percent
Speaker 2: from ninety five percent to ten percent from nineteen seventy
Speaker 2: two to twenty twenty three. There you go over over
Speaker 2: fifty years. This is an article from Bill Peacock, who
Speaker 2: I looked him up. I didn't. His name didn't register
Speaker 2: with me. He's somebody who has for a long time
Speaker 2: worked for thank tanks, Heartland Institute he worked for. But
Speaker 2: he did a lot of stuff in Texas and as
Speaker 2: a Republican, as a Christian, and he wrote this article
Speaker 2: of the vanity of christless Conservatism. We're starting to see
Speaker 2: this from various corners. Again, even an atheist can see it.
Speaker 2: As I point out, he said, the modern conservative movement
Speaker 2: came to life of the nineteen fifties around William F.
Speaker 2: Buckley and the National Review. Who I don't really consider
Speaker 2: them to be real conservatives either, you know, he is.
Speaker 2: He was connected quite a bit to the CIA, and
Speaker 2: he fought with people who wanted to you know, the
Speaker 2: John Bird Society that wanted to focus on the Constitution.
Speaker 2: He fought with them significantly. Anyway, in nineteen eighty Reagan
Speaker 2: and the Heritage Foundation brought in the mainstream Newt Gingrich
Speaker 2: Congresha and Republicans took back Congress in nineteen ninety six.
Speaker 2: That's what caused me to run in nineteen ninety four.
Speaker 2: That's what caused me to run in nineteen ninety six.
Speaker 2: I put out flyers and so yeah, they got a
Speaker 2: ten point plan, you know, their contract with America. I said,
Speaker 2: here's my contract with America. The Bill of wrights. I
Speaker 2: talked about how each and every one of those is
Speaker 2: being violated by our own government. But anyway, it looked
Speaker 2: like after forty years, conservatism, whatever that was, was well
Speaker 2: on its way to becoming America's guiding principal of governance. Today,
Speaker 2: obviously that's not the case. Not only has conservatism not
Speaker 2: taken over America, but conservatism, if we define it as
Speaker 2: a commitment to limited government, free markets and individual liberty,
Speaker 2: is not even the guiding principle within the Republican Party.
Speaker 2: And I don't that was my problem with the Republican
Speaker 2: Party always. I never saw the Republican Party was about
Speaker 2: limited government, free markets, in individual liberty. It wasn't about
Speaker 2: the constitution either. In response to populism, the new right
Speaker 2: has reacted to the growing dominance, I'm sorry. In response populism,
Speaker 2: and the new right has reacted to the growing dominance
Speaker 2: of progressives. The new right has sought to reassert Christian
Speaker 2: morality in the public square, but Boombents have misdiagnosed the problem.
Speaker 2: Problem wasn't one of a commitment to unfettered liberty, but
Speaker 2: a failure of publicly to acknowledge that true liberty only
Speaker 2: comes through Jesus Christ, and I absolutely agree with it,
Speaker 2: he said. Buckley never sought to bring the word of
Speaker 2: God to bear and his fight against liberalism and the culture,
Speaker 2: and Reagan took a similar approach. You talk about the
Speaker 2: man upstairs or whatever, you know, Jesus was he who
Speaker 2: must not be named. So I worked in public policy
Speaker 2: for over thirty years, and for most of that time
Speaker 2: I have worked closely with other Christians in Texas and
Speaker 2: across the country, and the public policies that we proposed
Speaker 2: and implemented, more often than not, comported with scripture. While
Speaker 2: that was a good thing, it wasn't enough. In fact,
Speaker 2: it never really was. America's post World War two Enlightenment
Speaker 2: driven practice was not bringing God's word to public discourse.
Speaker 2: Means that for seventy years Conservatives have essentially been engaging
Speaker 2: in just a massive educational effort. There's no power in it.
Speaker 2: And why did that happen? He doesn't talk about Madeline
Speaker 2: Murio here in her campaign. When I was a school child,
Speaker 2: that's when she started all this stuff. And the Supreme
Speaker 2: Court said, no, you can't have any religion in school,
Speaker 2: and not just teaching religion, which I would not support
Speaker 2: a school teaching religion. But I don't support schools at all.
Speaker 2: You all know that. But it wasn't just that. It
Speaker 2: was that they were going to suppress the free expression
Speaker 2: of any religion by anyone, students, faculty, administration. Nobody can
Speaker 2: express their religious desires. And that's not what the Constitution
Speaker 2: was about. As a matter of fact, you know, we
Speaker 2: talked about the Freedom from Religion Association and I talked
Speaker 2: about that just a couple of days ago, and how
Speaker 2: Richard Dawkins and multiple people resigned because they were no
Speaker 2: longer about free expression of religion. They had a stupid
Speaker 2: op ed piece about transgenderism. You know, what is a woman, Well,
Speaker 2: a woman is anybody who thinks they're a woman, that
Speaker 2: type of thing. And the person said, well, this is
Speaker 2: nothing but tatology. And you know, as a biologist we
Speaker 2: have to get objective about things. This is not scientific.
Speaker 2: This is actually a religion, and they shut that person down.
Speaker 2: That person didn't say it was actually a religion. That
Speaker 2: was one of the people besides Richard Dawkins that resigned
Speaker 2: from the board. That other person who was a psychologist,
Speaker 2: said well, you actually have created your own little religion here.
Speaker 2: Dawkins said, you've just completely detached yourself from physical observable reality,
Speaker 2: from science. And so both of them resigned. But that
Speaker 2: is what Freedom from Religion has said, that they want
Speaker 2: to shut down religion, but they've established their own religion,
Speaker 2: and atheists do have their own religion. That was one
Speaker 2: thing that William up Buckley said that I agree with.
Speaker 2: He said, atheists have their gods and they're fiercely worshiped.
Speaker 2: And so we see that has been the case. But
Speaker 2: the purpose of a lot of these mid century atheists
Speaker 2: and the Supreme Court, and that work has been carried
Speaker 2: on by the Freedom from Religion, is to suppress all
Speaker 2: free exercise of religion. He says, what the US desperately
Speaker 2: needs is a revival brought about through the Holy Spirit,
Speaker 2: through Christians who do not shrink from declaring to our
Speaker 2: rebellious culture, the whole Council of God. We don't need
Speaker 2: to spend time calling Americans back to conservatism. We need
Speaker 2: to call them to a faith in Jesus Christ. He
Speaker 2: agrees with the atheist and I said, look, we don't
Speaker 2: have to. Our job is not to judge other people,
Speaker 2: and our job is not to debate other people. Our
Speaker 2: job is not to win an argument and to own
Speaker 2: the other side. Our job is and that's what evangelism
Speaker 2: really was about, was just declaring the good news. Right.
Speaker 2: We just need to not be ashamed of the Gospel
Speaker 2: of Christ, and we need to say that out loud,
Speaker 2: regardless of whether or not. We don't know how people
Speaker 2: are going to respond to that. That's between them and God.
Speaker 2: That's determined on what God is doing in their life,
Speaker 2: the condition of their heart. But our job is to
Speaker 2: not back away from that and just tell people the
Speaker 2: truth and not be ashamed of it. And are at
Speaker 2: a turning point. We've had people now pushing back recently
Speaker 2: against these prohibitions. We had the coach who would pray
Speaker 2: silently on the fifty yard line. They fired him for that.
Speaker 2: He's now won in the Supreme Court. We've had a
Speaker 2: lot of different cases like that. He said. Psalm two
Speaker 2: to one tells us that kings and rulers of the
Speaker 2: earth plot in vain to burst the bonds and the
Speaker 2: cords that bound them to God and has anointed the
Speaker 2: vanity and futility like this has been happening and post
Speaker 2: World War II America, people and their leaders believing that
Speaker 2: they can thrive and prosper without acknowledging the sovereign lordship
Speaker 2: of Jesus Christ over their lives and their culture, he said.
Speaker 2: Doug Watson explains it this way. He says, secularism appeared
Speaker 2: to work for a long time as it did because
Speaker 2: it was a heresy that took root and a culture
Speaker 2: that still retained enormous amounts of Christian capital. We kind
Speaker 2: of coasted on this, We kind of coasted on the
Speaker 2: blessings of previous generations. He said. It worked for as
Speaker 2: long as it did for the same reason that the
Speaker 2: prodigal son was able to buy drinks for all of
Speaker 2: his party friends for more than just a couple of days,
Speaker 2: and so that is what he did. But what he
Speaker 2: was doing, what he was doing was spending his father's
Speaker 2: money as though it was money that he had earned himself.
Speaker 2: And then when his father's money ran out and there
Speaker 2: was a famine, and there he was staring at the
Speaker 2: pig food and he started to realize that more is
Speaker 2: required to sustain a free republic than to provide your
Speaker 2: buddies with free beer. Going back to Peacocky says America
Speaker 2: has come to the point of collapse and We're living
Speaker 2: in a culture dominated by progressive elites on the left
Speaker 2: and rebellion against God, who believe abortion is a choice,
Speaker 2: that genders are fluid, and that humans, along with the
Speaker 2: rest of the universe, are the products of random chance.
Speaker 2: They're determined to cover up the evidence of God's work
Speaker 2: by creating a suitable object of worship in his place.
Speaker 2: In large part, this appears to be the state. Rebellion
Speaker 2: against God is not a partisan issue. There are plenty
Speaker 2: of people on the right whose denial of God has
Speaker 2: contributed to America's decline. Some unbelieving conservatives and moderates have
Speaker 2: made an idle out of prosperity. That's right, it's about winning. Right,
Speaker 2: Winning is everything. It's just everything. It's the only thing.
Speaker 2: As we've been told, and we keep hearing as an
Speaker 2: excuse for what Trump does. We keep pearing, well, we've
Speaker 2: got to win. We got to win. And what is
Speaker 2: the yardstick that Trump always uses his winning? His power
Speaker 2: and money. That's what it's about. It's all just about money.
Speaker 2: And if you, as I said before, if that's what
Speaker 2: you're going to pursue now, you're never going to hit
Speaker 2: the real target because you're not even aiming at the
Speaker 2: real target. They've undermined by searching, making an idol out
Speaker 2: of prosperity. They've undermined God's design for economic growth by
Speaker 2: turning it over to an amalgam of big government in
Speaker 2: big business. Many unbelieving libertarians have been turned to self
Speaker 2: worship and claim that the autonomous self, without government or God,
Speaker 2: is the solution to our problems. Rebellious souls, either left
Speaker 2: or right, don't know God and are in desperate need
Speaker 2: of hearing his word, including the whole Council of God
Speaker 2: on public policy issues. People need to hear the word
Speaker 2: of God because it changes hearts, and I'm glad to
Speaker 2: see that both atheists as well as some conservatives are
Speaker 2: starting to understand this too. Many Christians, he said, have
Speaker 2: abandoned the application of God's word to civil government, and
Speaker 2: he said it has a couple of different consequences to
Speaker 2: of them. First, Christians deprive themselves of the whole Council
Speaker 2: of God, and then they get confused about what's happening
Speaker 2: in the culture. Second, the Church has in practice abandoned
Speaker 2: an unbelieving culture that is in desperate need of God's word,
Speaker 2: much like ancient Israel failed to witness and to love
Speaker 2: the gentiles as God had commanded them. And so and
Speaker 2: we start to focus on prosperity, or we start to
Speaker 2: focus on culture and winning the culture war, winning a
Speaker 2: political contest. We are focused on the wrong thing. We're
Speaker 2: not going to win. But a big part of all
Speaker 2: of this I think goes back to purging God out
Speaker 2: of public life. And we have Christians who are afraid
Speaker 2: of government and afraid of these pronouncements, and they will
Speaker 2: obey God rather obey men rather than God. And that's
Speaker 2: what we saw during the lockdowns. That's what this church
Speaker 2: in Sweden is doing. Right. They've got their religion of
Speaker 2: climate stuff that they fear legitimately fear. I think, not
Speaker 2: that it's legitimate, and I say that that there actually
Speaker 2: fear that as opposed to the government regulations. I think
Speaker 2: they really buy into It's what I meant by legitimately.
Speaker 2: I think they buy into the climate thing themselves. I
Speaker 2: think it isn't just that, well, I don't know what
Speaker 2: we're going to do. I mean, the government has told
Speaker 2: us that we can't heat this with oil, and we
Speaker 2: can't afford to replace anything else, so we'll just shut
Speaker 2: it down. They should defy that, but they're not going
Speaker 2: to do it. And so he says, we have no
Speaker 2: other choice actually for restoring prosperity, because again it's a
Speaker 2: blessing from God. You know, the founders of this country.
Speaker 2: When you look at the Mayflower, what do they say
Speaker 2: in the Mayflower Compact? He says, they begin with in
Speaker 2: the name of God, Amen. But it doesn't end with that.
Speaker 2: He could go a little bit further in that part
Speaker 2: of the purpose that they had that they listed in
Speaker 2: the Mayfower Compact was that they wanted to come to
Speaker 2: the New World and to bring the blessings of knowing
Speaker 2: God to the people who lived there, to the natives
Speaker 2: who are there. That was part of it. The rationale
Speaker 2: for the declaration of independence was that colonists have been
Speaker 2: endowed by their creator with certain invalilable rights. This as
Speaker 2: an eighteen twenty four the Pennsylvania Supreme Court found quote,
Speaker 2: Christianity general. Christianity is and always has been a part
Speaker 2: of the common law of Pennsylvania. Not Christianity with an
Speaker 2: established church in tithes and spiritual courts, but Christianity with
Speaker 2: a liberty of conscience to all men. And this is
Speaker 2: what we mean when we say that America is a
Speaker 2: Christian nation, its built on those Christian principles, not a
Speaker 2: particular established church and all the things that come with it,
Speaker 2: but the Christian principles that were their. US Supreme Court
Speaker 2: affirmed this in eighteen forty four, again so once in
Speaker 2: eighteen twenty four. Another time in eighteen forty four it concluded,
Speaker 2: it is also said and truly that the Christian religion
Speaker 2: is a part of the common law of Pennsylvania. As
Speaker 2: late as eighteen ninety two, the U. S. Supreme Court
Speaker 2: and the Church of Holy Trinity versus US quoted this.
Speaker 2: When it found, indeed that the US was a Christian nation,
Speaker 2: they said, if we passed beyond these matters to a
Speaker 2: view of American life as expressed by its laws, its businesses,
Speaker 2: its customs, its society, we find everywhere a clear recognition
Speaker 2: of the same truth, that the Christian religion is a
Speaker 2: part of the common law of Pennsylvania. Note the following
Speaker 2: the form of oath universally prevailing, concluding with an appeal
Speaker 2: to the Almighty. You know I swear to poll the constitution,
Speaker 2: so help me God right. The custom of opening sessions
Speaker 2: of all deliberative bodies and most conventions with prayer and
Speaker 2: the preparatory words of all wills in the name of God.
Speaker 2: Amen is what's typically was put into the wills, the
Speaker 2: laws respecting the observance of the Sabbath, with a general
Speaker 2: cessation of secular business and the closing of courts and
Speaker 2: and other similar public assemblies on that day. The churches
Speaker 2: and the church organizations which around every city town in Hamlet,
Speaker 2: multitude of charitable organizations existing everywhere under Christian auspices. You know,
Speaker 2: we talked yesterday about the fires and when Listener pointed out,
Speaker 2: they call it state farm was because you had farmers
Speaker 2: who came together in mutual society to help each other
Speaker 2: when there was a disaster. In the same way, when
Speaker 2: they wanted to a library, they would create a library.
Speaker 2: When they wanted to school, they'd create a school. When
Speaker 2: they wanted a hospital, they would do that. And it
Speaker 2: was the people of the community. And it's frequently done
Speaker 2: with Christian involvement and churches involved in that. But we've
Speaker 2: gotten away from that now. Now we looked at the
Speaker 2: government to do everything for us, and that's the government
Speaker 2: that does everything to us. As Joe Ford said, any
Speaker 2: government that can give you everything that you want, is
Speaker 2: going to take everything that you've got. And that's what
Speaker 2: they're doing, and we're demanding more of that, even to
Speaker 2: the extent that you got a large part of the
Speaker 2: population cheering Trump on to do one hundred executive orders
Speaker 2: on his first day. We want a dictator to rule
Speaker 2: over us. Yeah, it is kind of like Israel. You know,
Speaker 2: we want a king. And God says to them, it
Speaker 2: is because you've rejected me. He was the one who
Speaker 2: was going to protect them, but they didn't want them.
Speaker 2: They wanted to be like everybody else. They wanted to
Speaker 2: king to rule over me. He said, well, that king
Speaker 2: is going to steal your money. He's going to put
Speaker 2: your sons into the military. He's going to press your
Speaker 2: daughters into service. They're making disciples in the nation. As
Speaker 2: a mission statement of the church, individual Christians must not
Speaker 2: leave this work only to the institutional church. Look, nothing
Speaker 2: is to be left to the institutional church. It's all
Speaker 2: about individuals. The church is nothing if it's not the individuals.
Speaker 2: It's kind of this. We create these abstractions like public
Speaker 2: school or like public health, and you know what happens
Speaker 2: when you get public health, Well it ignores the health
Speaker 2: of individuals. When you get public schools, all they do
Speaker 2: is push the government agenda. And when you get institutions,
Speaker 2: the institutions that we create are not the things that
Speaker 2: are going to do this. When we talk about a church,
Speaker 2: that's simply God's people that he called out. It's not
Speaker 2: some building. It's not some political hierarchy, some organizations, some denomination,
Speaker 2: it's not that at all. And those things don't work.
Speaker 2: They rot from the head down, and most of them
Speaker 2: have been around long enough that they are stinking corpses.
Speaker 2: All of the stuff that we're called to do, we're
Speaker 2: called to do individually. And if you don't do it,
Speaker 2: nobody else is going to do it. You don't want
Speaker 2: some institution, whatever that institution is, whether it's a government
Speaker 2: school or whether it is a church, you don't want
Speaker 2: them raising your children. That's your job. It's nobody else's job.
Speaker 2: That's yours. Well, he finishes by saying God's word is powerful,
Speaker 2: and it'll change the hearts and minds of many of
Speaker 2: those who promote government policies that stand in rebellion against God.
Speaker 2: It'll provide wisdom and insight into our policy problems that
Speaker 2: a secular analysis will always miss. And he finishes it
Speaker 2: with one of my favorite passages of scripture from Isaiah
Speaker 2: fifty five. As the rain the snow come down from
Speaker 2: heaven and do not return, but water the earth, making
Speaker 2: it bring forth and sprout, and giving seed to the
Speaker 2: sower and bread to the eater. So shall my word
Speaker 2: be that goes out of my mouth, It shall not
Speaker 2: return to me empty, but will accomplish what I purpose.
Speaker 2: And you know, when you think about that, we've got
Speaker 2: snow that's coming this afternoon, and they say, who knows?
Speaker 2: It may be snowing now for all way, No, I
Speaker 2: don't have any windows in here. But when the snow
Speaker 2: comes down, it doesn't water the ground right away, does it.
Speaker 2: It sets there for a while. And I think that
Speaker 2: the word of God is that way as well. You know,
Speaker 2: sometimes it's like rain. Sometimes it soaks in immediately. Sometimes
Speaker 2: it can sit there for days, months, years, decades before
Speaker 2: it sinks in, but it does. And I always thought
Speaker 2: that was an interesting analogy that he used. But God's
Speaker 2: thoughts are not our thoughts, and his ways are not
Speaker 2: our ways. But he has mercy that we cannot understand.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a quick break and we will
Speaker 2: be right back.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 10: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
Speaker 10: these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
Speaker 10: all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
Speaker 10: And I could if only David Knight would send me
Speaker 10: one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
Speaker 10: black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But
Speaker 10: he told me to get lost. Be one of you
Speaker 10: American suckers can buy me some at the David Knightshow
Speaker 10: dot com. You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Speaker 10: Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd
Speaker 10: wear something other than green military cosplay to my various
Speaker 10: gallas and social events. If you want to save on shipping,
Speaker 10: just put it in the next package of bombs and
Speaker 10: missiles coming from the USA.
Speaker 2: They're doing what in the place they named after me?
Speaker 2: Good thing.
Speaker 1: I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed
Speaker 1: on the plots of these traders. Making sense common again.
Speaker 1: This is the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: North American House EPO talk about that is, he said,
Speaker 2: my wife told me if she wanted to get a tattoo,
Speaker 2: I said, if she gets one, I get one, will
Speaker 2: say do not resuscitate across my chest with my signature.
Speaker 2: And so she never got her tattoos. Teresa Andrea. They
Speaker 2: arrested a father who was a tattoo artist for tatting
Speaker 2: his kid about a year back, and the kid wanted
Speaker 2: one too. Well, it wasn't just like hold him down,
Speaker 2: I'm gonna tattoo. Yeah, like I said, in most states,
Speaker 2: it's illegal, even with parental consent. So shadow boxer transsects
Speaker 2: surgeries were first down in the nineteen thirties Germany. It's
Speaker 2: a big part of why Hitler came into power, and
Speaker 2: you know, and it's very much. It reminded me of
Speaker 2: that the guy the Brookings Institute, Guy Rausch, who was
Speaker 2: the atheist. You know, he doesn't believe it, but he
Speaker 2: wants it for the good of society. And Nische kind
Speaker 2: of said the same thing. You know, we've killed God,
Speaker 2: you know, God help us, you know at this point,
Speaker 2: and you you saw in Germany was where higher criticism began,
Speaker 2: where people said, well, we're going to say, well, I
Speaker 2: think this is we're going to take this part of
Speaker 2: the Bible, but we're not going to take that part
Speaker 2: of the Bible, and we're going to critique it from
Speaker 2: a higher position. Well, you just threw it all out,
Speaker 2: and we saw the fruit of what that bore. You know,
Speaker 2: we saw the themar Republic and how corrupt it was
Speaker 2: and debauch. But of course it's nothing compared to what
Speaker 2: we have today in America. You look at the film
Speaker 2: like The Blue Angel, for example, Marlena Dietrich saw, you know,
Speaker 2: falling in love again that had but it was a
Speaker 2: story about this this sad professor was addicted to sex,
Speaker 2: and you know how she wrapped him around her finger
Speaker 2: and that type of thing and destroyed his life and
Speaker 2: in the same way like as a drug addiction would.
Speaker 2: But you get a glimpse of the semi vimar republic
Speaker 2: with that. With with Cabaret, you know, the play, the
Speaker 2: Broadway play they turned into a movie, all that kind
Speaker 2: of stuff. And now we've gone above and beyond that.
Speaker 2: I think secluded oyster. Wrap it, Onset says, is actually
Speaker 2: the term they finally admitted to, especially for girls, a
Speaker 2: social contagion. Yeah, wrap it, Onset just gaslight is the
Speaker 2: best way to describe it. Assyrian girl says, I think
Speaker 2: some children are unfortunately born to the wrong parents. They're
Speaker 2: not in the wrong body, they're in the wrong family.
Speaker 2: That's good. Uh, don't frag me. Bro says climate change
Speaker 2: is made up catastrophe used by the powers that be
Speaker 2: to install fear and guilt so that they can tax,
Speaker 2: regulate and remove our freedoms, pretending to be saving the planet.
Speaker 2: Absolutely right. A big brit is back again, says no
Speaker 2: synagogues closed. That's interesting. I wonder if that is the case.
Speaker 2: I didn't follow through with any of that stuff. I
Speaker 2: think it's just the most outrageous thing that churches will
Speaker 2: voluntarily shut down. Some of them eventually came back around,
Speaker 2: and some of them never did I know that. Charles
Speaker 2: Stanley's son Andy Stanley, you know when some of the
Speaker 2: churches were opening up, he attacked them for opening back up.
Speaker 2: It's amazing. Matthew ronson, why not shut down their military
Speaker 2: for the climate crisis. No, they'll still drop bombs and
Speaker 2: they'll have the most inefficient of all vehicles. I mean,
Speaker 2: you look at the amount of fuel that is consumed
Speaker 2: by the jets and by the tanks and all the
Speaker 2: rest of the stuff. Probably measure the tank's fuel economy
Speaker 2: in gallons per mile, not miles per gallon. Hol nine
Speaker 2: thousand Watson YouTube shows a warning if you watch a
Speaker 2: Christian rock video. Yet one of the latest music VIDs
Speaker 2: from Meghan the Stallion esatanic and she's nude and it
Speaker 2: doesn't get pulled. Wow, not heard of that. Marky Martin
Speaker 2: New Jersey. Is Gerald Slunty coming on today? No, we
Speaker 2: got I said it earlier in the day and then
Speaker 2: we got a call from him that he can't make
Speaker 2: it today. He said he might come back, come on
Speaker 2: next week. So I'm anxious to get him on to
Speaker 2: see what his conclusions are. But he gave his heads up.
Speaker 2: I should have told everybody because I tease that I
Speaker 2: want to. I do want to get him on to
Speaker 2: talk about what he sees coming up the next year.
Speaker 2: Jerry Altalo says, mister Sunty will come at once, come
Speaker 2: on once he's finished sharpening his tongue. Oh he's had
Speaker 2: enough to He was saying the same thing, and we're
Speaker 2: saying you because he's anti war, and he says, yeah,
Speaker 2: they're gonna they can spend infinite amounts of money on
Speaker 2: bombs and missiles and planes and send them to other countries.
Speaker 2: But they can't do a thing, which many of us
Speaker 2: have been saying. He can't do a thing to fight
Speaker 2: the fires here. They're just going to set fires everywhere else.
Speaker 2: That's what they're really about. Well, one thing that I
Speaker 2: see that is maybe good, is a small thing, but
Speaker 2: it would roll back something that's been a thorn in
Speaker 2: the side. I don't know anybody who likes daylight savings time,
Speaker 2: not a single person. We all hate it, don't we.
Speaker 2: I mean, I hate is bad enough. I don't care
Speaker 2: which one they stick to, but I hate what it
Speaker 2: does to our sleep patterns and that type of stuff
Speaker 2: when we lose an hour. So senators have introduced a bill,
Speaker 2: and I like this as well. Instead of using some
Speaker 2: kind of hokey acronym, they call it a lock the
Speaker 2: clock bill. Let's lock the clock, don't let government touch it.
Speaker 2: A bipartisan group of senators, led by Senator Rick Scott,
Speaker 2: have reintroduced legislation to make daylight savings time permanent year round.
Speaker 2: Their proposal is opposed by a coalition of sleep medicine
Speaker 2: organizations which advocate for locking the clock, but in standard
Speaker 2: time mode. Well there you go. I mean, well, like
Speaker 2: I said, I don't care which one gets it, but
Speaker 2: if they fight over this, we're gonna wind up keeping
Speaker 2: this thing that keeps going back and forth and back
Speaker 2: and forth. Now, remember United Healthcare, the CEO shot in
Speaker 2: the back, and it turns out that it's the number
Speaker 2: four on the Fortune five hundred company list. They make
Speaker 2: so much money and they are by far and away
Speaker 2: the leader in terms of the percentage of claims that
Speaker 2: they reject. Well. United Healthcare was slammed by a doctor
Speaker 2: for denying a cancer patient's surgery while she was on
Speaker 2: the operating table. Doctor Elizabeth Potter, a plastic surgeon in Texas,
Speaker 2: claims performing breast reconstructive surgery on a breast cancer survivor
Speaker 2: when she received a phone call in the operating room
Speaker 2: mid surgery. Doctor Potter was allegedly told to contact United
Speaker 2: Healthcare right now about the patient on the operating table,
Speaker 2: forcing her to stop the surgery and take the call.
Speaker 2: She said on a TikTok video, she said, I was like,
Speaker 2: do you understand she's asleep right now and she has
Speaker 2: breast cancer, And the gentleman said, I don't. Actually, that's
Speaker 2: a different department that would know that, that would want
Speaker 2: that information. She said, I've never had this happen before.
Speaker 2: It's out of control. Insurance is out of control. I
Speaker 2: have no other words. Well I have a word. What's
Speaker 2: the matter with you? What's the matter with you? That
Speaker 2: you would be in the middle of doing a surgery
Speaker 2: but because you're not going to get your money, you're
Speaker 2: just going to let this person suffer.
Speaker 5: You know?
Speaker 2: Is some doctors do charity work. Evidently not doctor Elizabeth Potter.
Speaker 2: She's not going to make an exception. She's either going
Speaker 2: to get her money or she's not going to do it.
Speaker 2: Is she any better than United Healthcare? I don't think so.
Speaker 2: It's all about money, and you've got doctors that are
Speaker 2: just as greedy as the health insurance companies. And that's
Speaker 2: the problem with our health care. And she doesn't even
Speaker 2: see it. That's how blind she is to this. So
Speaker 2: company spokesman for United Healthcare responded to Daily Mail, who
Speaker 2: wanted comments. They said there are no insurance related circumstances
Speaker 2: that would require a physician to step out of surgery,
Speaker 2: and it would create potential safety risks if they were
Speaker 2: to do so we did not ask, nor would we
Speaker 2: ever expect a physician to interrupt patient care to answer
Speaker 2: a call, and we will be following up with a
Speaker 2: provider and the hospital to understand why these unorthodox actions
Speaker 2: were taken. This just greed all around. And if you
Speaker 2: look at her, she's a very very young person. I mean,
Speaker 2: by the you know, she's probably just started her medical
Speaker 2: practice and she's all about the money. I guess that's
Speaker 2: why she got into medicine. Right by the time she's
Speaker 2: gone to medical school and done her residency and stuff
Speaker 2: like that, that's about the age that somebody would be
Speaker 2: just getting started out. Without insurance, this reconstructive surgery would
Speaker 2: cost anywhere from thirty thousand to fifty thousand dollars. And
Speaker 2: she's not going to this is just going to stop
Speaker 2: the operation, right, admit operation if she doesn't get paid.
Speaker 2: That one pediatric neurology nurse on Reddit, so the company
Speaker 2: has allegedly denied anti seizure medications for children with epilepsy.
Speaker 2: Now we're back to the insurance company. The nurse wrote
Speaker 2: that we have United Healthcare deny seizure medications that we
Speaker 2: can definitively tell will benefit patients. Based on their EEG results,
Speaker 2: and they say, because it's not uhc's preferred medication. She said,
Speaker 2: the patient has to fail the preferred medication first, and
Speaker 2: by fail, this means that the patient has to have
Speaker 2: a load of seizures. So these kids have to seize
Speaker 2: their brains out to get medication that we know will
Speaker 2: control their seizures. Well, let's talk about that. You know
Speaker 2: we had and Texas there is no medical marijuana law,
Speaker 2: but they do have an exception for seizures for children
Speaker 2: having brain seizures, and we know a lot of times
Speaker 2: these brain seizers have been caused as a reaction to vaccines.
Speaker 2: David Simpson, who was an excellent state representative that I
Speaker 2: interviewed multiple times, a very strong Christian who tried to
Speaker 2: stop marijuana prohibition because he wanted people to be able
Speaker 2: to use this for health issues. And he said, I
Speaker 2: have two sets of parents in my district who at
Speaker 2: the time had gone to Colorado where medical marijuana was legal,
Speaker 2: and he said, they've tried everything for their children. They
Speaker 2: just have constant seizures like she's talking about here, and
Speaker 2: the only thing they found that worked was marijuana. And
Speaker 2: he said, so they can either move to Colorado, which
Speaker 2: they can't do, or they can run the risk of
Speaker 2: going to jail and having their child taken away if
Speaker 2: they give them medical marijuana here. And he made the
Speaker 2: case and he got that exception, even though they don't
Speaker 2: recognize marijuana as a medical thing anywhere else. But here's
Speaker 2: the thing, just like United Healthcare, well they say you're
Speaker 2: going to try before you can have the medical marijuana,
Speaker 2: you have to document that you've tried every other pharmaceutical
Speaker 2: intervention and that it didn't work. So just like United
Speaker 2: health Care, it's that they've got a different agenda. They
Speaker 2: want to push the CIA's war on drugs, and that's
Speaker 2: their agenda, whereas United Healthcare wants to push the pharmaceutical drugs.
Speaker 2: And in both cases they're willing eventually, at some point
Speaker 2: in time to let people have access to something that
Speaker 2: will help them these children, but in the meantime, they're
Speaker 2: going to let them suffer caizure after seizure. In many cases,
Speaker 2: it will cause issues damage to the kids. As people
Speaker 2: are looking at the upcoming trial of Luigi Mangioni, they
Speaker 2: said could fandom cause jury nullification in his trial, and
Speaker 2: of course that's what happened.
Speaker 1: With O. J.
Speaker 2: Simpson. Yeah, people who liked O. J. Simpson, and they
Speaker 2: gave him a pass on murder. On the civil trial,
Speaker 2: he was found guilty. So I believe that was a
Speaker 2: case of jury nullification, and that could be the same
Speaker 2: type of thing that happens with Luigi. People are looking
Speaker 2: at it and saying, you know, not that they think
Speaker 2: that he didn't do it. They think he did it,
Speaker 2: and they're okay with it. It kind of reminds me
Speaker 2: of what I think it was Adams. John Adams said,
Speaker 2: you know, we've got a form of government that only
Speaker 2: works and is only suitable if you have a moral people.
Speaker 2: If you've got people who have no morality that they
Speaker 2: would allow somebody to be shot in the back because
Speaker 2: of the grievances that they have with its insurance company
Speaker 2: or whatever. That's you know, people are going to come
Speaker 2: after jury nullification, which is a very very important check
Speaker 2: on the power of government. It is the most important
Speaker 2: check that we have on the power of government. If
Speaker 2: the government is going to haul you into court for
Speaker 2: some unjust law, some unconstitutional law, or if the penalty
Speaker 2: that you would have to pay if you're found guilty
Speaker 2: is too high, the jury has the duty to nullify
Speaker 2: that law. But what the jury would be doing here
Speaker 2: is nullifying laws against murder, and that is not just.
Speaker 2: And so it's sad to see that, but that's the
Speaker 2: kind of thing that happens after people have, you know,
Speaker 2: jettisoned the morality that has involved with it. Meanwhile, Kevin
Speaker 2: Lynn reveals the crisis that US doctors are being denied
Speaker 2: jobs as foreign graduates flood hospitals. So you've got engineers
Speaker 2: who are software engineers who are getting out of college
Speaker 2: and between artificial intelligence, between H one B VSA's, they
Speaker 2: can't get a job. Even if they got a perfect
Speaker 2: four point zero grade point average, even if they're coming
Speaker 2: from a name brand college, they can't get a job.
Speaker 2: And now you've got US doctors being denied jobs as
Speaker 2: foreign graduates are coming in and flooding the hospital. So
Speaker 2: is the greed situation going to get any better with us? No,
Speaker 2: You've got people who are coming here why because they
Speaker 2: want to make a ton of money. And you've got
Speaker 2: corporate hospitals who are hiring them. Why because they want
Speaker 2: to make a ton of money. Where does the patient
Speaker 2: come in in any of this? Nowhere, nowhere at all?
Speaker 2: This is you know, this is taking a bad situation
Speaker 2: and making it even worse. You know, we're talking about
Speaker 2: the O. J. Simpson thing. Made me think Karen's story.
Speaker 2: I've told this on thy four. I think she used
Speaker 2: to twirl the New York Jets. And this is before
Speaker 2: they came up with the over sexed cheerleader thing, right.
Speaker 2: She was she was very good at baton twirling. Actually
Speaker 2: got a college scholarship to do that, but anyway, didn't
Speaker 2: take it. Went to Tampa so she could meet me,
Speaker 2: but she, uh, this is at a time when O. J.
Speaker 2: Simpson was playing and their team was visiting. She was
Speaker 2: with the New York Jets and and she and she
Speaker 2: was in high school at the time, and Joe Namath
Speaker 2: was very famous, and he had been injured and he
Speaker 2: was on the sidelines at the game and not playing,
Speaker 2: and he was on crutches, and he was wearing purple
Speaker 2: velvet pants, right, red red velvet pants. Okay, And so
Speaker 2: she's back in the you know, the maze of tunnels
Speaker 2: that they've got there and everything, and she sees him
Speaker 2: kind of on crutches, and he throws the leg out
Speaker 2: and she sees just his red velvet pants and knows
Speaker 2: that that's Joe Namath and she gets really excited and
Speaker 2: she runs the other way to tell other people. Instead
Speaker 2: of running at him, she runs the other way and
Speaker 2: she runs smack dab into this big guy and she says,
Speaker 2: I just saw Joe Namath and then goes running to
Speaker 2: tell the other ones that were there. The other women
Speaker 2: that were there were older, and they started laughing and said,
Speaker 2: do you know.
Speaker 3: Who that is?
Speaker 1: That?
Speaker 2: You just that's o Ja Simpson And she said, who's
Speaker 2: he h? She didn't follow football at all even though
Speaker 2: she was there. Well, when we're talking about bringing in
Speaker 2: the Indian doctors, turns out that in Indian prisons the
Speaker 2: caste system is rigorously enforced there. You know, some societies
Speaker 2: are better than other societies, aren't they? What they have
Speaker 2: these Indian prisoners doing. If they are a lower cast
Speaker 2: they are barred from cooking food and they are forced
Speaker 2: to clean the excrement of their betters. This is part
Speaker 2: of the Hindu caste system, the hierarchy that is there.
Speaker 2: And you've heard doctor Shiva talk about that. He was
Speaker 2: on the other end of that, and you know, you
Speaker 2: get locked into sometimes much worse than the class system.
Speaker 2: Even that used to be in Europe so much. One
Speaker 2: person lower caste that to his shock, he was asked
Speaker 2: directed to clean the drains. He said, I protested. I
Speaker 2: tried talking to authorities to assign me cutting and chopping work,
Speaker 2: but they would not listen to me, and I was
Speaker 2: asked to clean the drains out, he said. The jail
Speaker 2: manual there clearly mentions that quote religious scruples and cast
Speaker 2: prejudices are important for reformative influences. A separate chapter there
Speaker 2: says reasonable respects she'll be paid to religious scruples and
Speaker 2: cast prejudices of the prisoners in all matters as far
Speaker 2: as it is compatible with discipline. So in other words,
Speaker 2: they're going to enforce that Hindu religion on everyone. And
Speaker 2: you know this type of you know, it really does matter.
Speaker 2: Religion forms the basis for all of our culture. It
Speaker 2: forms the basis for our laws. It is at the
Speaker 2: fountain head of all of it. By the way, Eric,
Speaker 2: thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that.
Speaker 2: On rock Fan, thank you so much.
Speaker 7: So.
Speaker 2: As we all know, AI is coming for us and
Speaker 2: it wants more and more details of our intimate life.
Speaker 2: And of course Sam Altman is out there pushing it.
Speaker 2: He says, there'll be a very significant change to the
Speaker 2: way the world works and the way that the world
Speaker 2: works in a very short period of time because people
Speaker 2: like him want to redesign it. People like Elon Musk
Speaker 2: want to redesign it in terms of looking at people's
Speaker 2: intimate details. Maybe he shouldn't throw stones in this glass house.
Speaker 2: Sam Altman has just been accused by his sister of
Speaker 2: sexual assault. This is the guy who is going around
Speaker 2: Washington saying, don't allow anybody else to do artificial intelligence.
Speaker 2: It needs to be just a few corporations. And that's
Speaker 2: what in treason the venture capitalist said. When he met
Speaker 2: with people in the Biden administration, they said, to forget
Speaker 2: about artificial intelligence. We've decided who's going to do that,
Speaker 2: and we're going to keep it off limits. Because you
Speaker 2: can't keep it off limits. They said, oh yes, we can.
Speaker 2: We have in the past had entire disciplines of science
Speaker 2: that we've kept off limits to people. He said, So
Speaker 2: I learned a couple of things right there, And he said,
Speaker 2: meant that I was going to oppose the Biden administration.
Speaker 2: But do you think it was a Biden administration that
Speaker 2: did that it's the people who Biden wasn't running that
Speaker 2: white House. Trump's not going to be running that White
Speaker 2: House anymore. He's just their petulant puppet that is out
Speaker 2: there stirring things up and creating chaos. And Biden the
Speaker 2: people who were telling that to Mark Andresen. And he
Speaker 2: got his beginning by doing a netscape, you know, the
Speaker 2: first browsers that were out there. He made a lot
Speaker 2: of money, and now he's a venture capitalist doing a
Speaker 2: lot of other things. But these are people that have
Speaker 2: been around for a long time that he was talking to.
Speaker 2: These are people there were probably a part of that
Speaker 2: redlining of certain scientific and mathematical activities. They're the ones
Speaker 2: who are the actual government, you know, the ones that
Speaker 2: you don't get to vote for, the ones that are
Speaker 2: not accountable to you, the ones who are actually the
Speaker 2: real government in the background, places like Palateer, for example,
Speaker 2: the data mining that is going on there, and we
Speaker 2: don't have time to get into it, but Life site
Speaker 2: News talks about it in terms of so what do
Speaker 2: you need to know about Palenteer. I've done reports on Palenteer,
Speaker 2: I've played him multiple times on They seek to know
Speaker 2: everything about you. The most intimate details, even use that
Speaker 2: the Palleteer from Lord of the Rings in that way,
Speaker 2: you know, you think that you're communicating with other people,
Speaker 2: but no, that thing is actually looking into your life.
Speaker 2: And Palannteer has been there from the very beginning, not
Speaker 2: just in artificial intelligence, but in the other AI anticipatory intelligence.
Speaker 2: They have worked with the military abroad, they've worked with
Speaker 2: police departments here. And when you combine all of that
Speaker 2: stuff with a massive surveillance network, again a public private partnership,
Speaker 2: the massive surveillance of the flock cameras that are everywhere,
Speaker 2: you know, there's if there's any arson, if they wanted
Speaker 2: to look at it, I'm sure they've got the footage
Speaker 2: right there if they wanted to see the arson, just
Speaker 2: like everything else, just like what happened in Vegas, they've
Speaker 2: got the footage if they wanted to show people that.
Speaker 2: That's very suspicious, isn't it. Well that's it for the weekend.
Speaker 2: We'll see you on Monday.
Speaker 10: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
Speaker 10: these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
Speaker 10: all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better,
Speaker 10: and I could if only David Knight would send me
Speaker 10: one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
Speaker 10: black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But
Speaker 10: he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
Speaker 10: American suckers can buy me some. At the Davidknightshow dot com.
Speaker 10: You should be able to buy me several hundred. Those
Speaker 10: amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful, I'd wear
Speaker 10: something other than green military cosplay to my various gallas
Speaker 10: and social events. If you want to save on shipping,
Speaker 10: just put it in the next package of bombs and
Speaker 10: missiles coming from the USA.