Speaker 1: If you want to get the show early and ad free,
head on over to the Peak Kinyonas show dot com.
There you can choose from where you wish to support me.
Now listen very carefully. I've had some people ask me
about this, even though I think on the last ad
I stated it pretty clearly. If you want an RSS feed,
you're going to have to subscribe your substance or through Patreon.
You can also subscribe on my website which is right there,
gum Road and what's the other one, subscribe Star And
if you do that, you will get access to the
audio file. So head on over to the peakan Yonashow
dot com. You'll see all the ways that you can
support me there. And I just want to thank everyone.
It's because of you that I can put out the
amount of material that I do. I can do what
I'm doing with doctor Johnson on two hundred Years Together
and everything else, the things that Thomas and I are
doing together on kindinal philosophy, it's all because of you.
And yeah, I mean, I'll never be able to thank
you enough. So thank you. The Pekanyonashow dot com. Everything's there.
Welcome back, Stormy's back, Stormy How are you doing doing good?
Speaker 2: Doing doing good? I mean we've had a little bit
of rough he was this morning in the community. But
aside from that, I am.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, yeah, he will be missed.
Speaker 2: The one guy didn't get a chance to meet actually
m at that at that OOGC event, very sad about that.
Speaker 1: We got to, uh, I gotta get some people together
who've you know, interviewed him and knew him especially, and
do like a memorial kind of like live stream, because yeah,
he is uh z Man was somebody who he couldn't
help but make me laugh. I was always laughing at
anything he wrote, in anything he said, because he just
had that perfect way of even if it wasn't a
funny subject, he would pronounce something wrong on purpose just
to make it funny. And people thought he was retarded
because of it. But but I just know he's doing
it on purpose. That's just the best.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think he he is like the previous I
don't know if there's generations to this, because you know,
the whole thing from start to end is I mean
not to end yet we haven't ended, but from the
start of really like the return of the real right wing,
you know, like Thomas Era you know.
Speaker 3: Use net forums, you know, or bodybuilding forums like this
existing there to like now we're actually influencing policy.
Speaker 2: It's it's not over yet, but from like the old truans,
I think he occupied the space for a lot of
people that like let's say Darryl Cooper occupies now right
from being that like bridge to where somebody can be
like relatively conservative and then here you know, zmail and
speak and go. He's right, everything's all fucked up. You know,
he was that guy for a lot of tech guys.
I know.
Speaker 1: Actually, well, what's what's interesting is when I was when
I was making the crossover. You know, someone that we
both know was you know, a friend of mine more
you've met him a couple of times, you met him once,
but the he recommended to me, He's like, yeah, you
should be listening to his emn and you should be
listening to like Charles Haywood. And that was when you know,
I basically started to really make make the hard turn
out of the whole libertarian thing, because that's when you
realize being an individual while everybody else is being a collectivist,
you're just going to get your ass pounded.
Speaker 2: That's actually really interesting. I can't think of a more
perfect combination of recommendations for like a libertarian at that time,
libertarian minded person that like had like z Man and
Heywood would be like the perfect like libertarian deprogramming team
because like they hit just on that right level of
autism and hyper rationality.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and like on Charles's part, And I don't think
he'd have any problem me saying this. Love Charles a
little bit of arrogance that libertarians have too.
Speaker 2: Yes, I know I'm right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, well he actually is right, Yeah, exactly exactly,
speaking of people who think that they they people who
think they know they're right. Let's go from people who
know their right to people who think they know they're right.
So you had mentioned this on I think a couple
Inquisition episodes, and it was just like, well, I know
that Stormy has a little bit of free time, time
to get him on the show and talk about this,
So you want to give an introduction into what we're
going to talk about today.
Speaker 2: We're going to talk about cognitive warfare, which has been
NATO doctrine for I think going on seven years now
and really no sorry ten years. And it really picked
up and kind of changed direction after twenty sixteen, you
could probably guess why because you know, just like they
said recently before the new head of NATO was replaced,
I'm sorry the old head of NATO was replaced by
Trump's person. The previous head of NATO said that Donald
Trump was the greatest threat to NATO that existed at
the moment, which was very interesting because literally Vladimir Putin
was flattening Ukraine. It was a very odd thing to say.
But he wasn't wrong because NATO views populism and nationalism
as its actual number one threat, and they rationalized that
a whole bunch of ways. Early on, they rationalized it
with this is it's actually China that's doing this, and
then the flavor change once in the in the lead
up so like twenty twenty one, and then officially like
really took a hard turn in twenty twenty two when
they're like, oh no, the person that's doing the cognitive
warfare is actually is actually Vladimir Putin to Russia. But
the premise of cognitive warfare is the actual battleground that
most conflicts or most of the conflict will happen on,
is inside people's brains and defensive postures against cognitive warfare
is a thing that they devote the most resources to
because of course it could come at any time from
any direction. So defensive posturing or sorry, defensive postured cognitive
warfare views the battlefield and the potential enemy combatants as
their own domestic populations. Right, So when you hear where
it's like cognitive warfare, just remember that you, the person
that's listening to this, is primary threat and anything China
is doing or Russia is doing is going to manifest
itself in you. So they need to own your headspace.
And what we'll go into a little bit more is
how literally I mean that, because if they don't own
your headspace, then Russia or China or Iran, they could
own your headspace and turn you against you know, the
liberal world order, the liberal democracies, or whichever NATO docs
use alternating terms. But it's everyone thinks like, oh yeah,
I know propaganda and oh yeah, I know psyops, and
they think that that's what they're seeing on the timeline
or that that's what they think they're seeing in media,
But that doesn't even scratch the surface as to what's
actually happening. And right before we started recording, I just
started to mention the difference in Twitter timelines that you
can choose from. One is for you and the other
one is following, and following is supposed to be all
of the people you follow all of their posts in
chronological order, at least that's what I was told that
it was supposed to be, but we all know that
that's not the case. Even the following as well as
the for you is algorithmically curated. So what people think
is that, oh, depending on the agenda that they want
to roll out, the algorithm is going to tweak what
posts I see, you know, to try and paint a
certain picture that would be psychological operations. What's actually happening.
Whether it's TikTok, whether it's Instagram, whether it's Twitter is
no matter which algorithm you choose, the real purpose of
the algorithm isn't to feed you anything specific. It's to
map the inside of your head. Right. The order in
which things come out on your timeline has far less
to do with convincing you of something than it is
to learning how you think you personally. Every single person
that uses Twitter is an anonymized data set or not
very anonymoused depending on you know, whether you work in
Paulo outdoor tel Aviv, but a number is assigned to you,
and that algorithm, algorithm or the TikTok algorithm's main job
is not showing you content. It's to build a very
in depth psychological profile.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: It is constantly ab testing. And you'd say, like, well,
I'm not reacting to anything. What if I don't like anything? Right?
So when I say that, you think, well, oh, it's
seeing what I like and what I don't like. No, no, no, no, no.
Everybody spends so much, remember Pete, Like, if you were
like an edgy guy, or like you were a I
don't trust the government type of guy, you'd get a
laptop and the very first thing you'd do is put
like a piece of tape or something to cover up
your laptop. Uh camera, yeah, yeah, yeah. You know what
really boggles my mind is that no one ever bothered
doing that with the phone that they have in front
of their face every minute of every day. You're going
to cover up your laptop camera because their concept of
spying somebody spying on them is another person looking through
that camera and watching them do stuff that's not at
all what's happening and if you actually knew what was
you know what your devices were doing, you would cover
up that phone camera way more quickly then you'd ever
worry about your laptop camera, because what your phone camera
has is two light oar cameras, one high resolution camera
and then a thermal imaging device. Do you ever wonder
why you can't operate your iPhone with a pencil or
like an eraser, It has to be your finger or
a device that simulates your finger. It's because it actually
needs electra. It's the electric charge in your finger, right,
like from your muscles, from your heart beating. Actually there's
enough electric charge for it to read. And it's the
electric charge in your body, not the heat, not the
pressure that the touchscreen is responding to. So from the
thermal camera, they can basically monitor the micro fluctuations in
your core body temperature in your face. What happens when
you get really mad, your face gets tingly and hot,
like you get bright red when you're angry or when
you're embarrassed or whatever. But that's happening on a much
smaller level, imperceivable to you, right, fluctuations of a quarter
of a degree all the time. That's what the thermal
imaging cameras can doing what is the light our camera doing? Well,
the light our camera is mapping your face.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: Micro expressions are a real thing. They're vital to building
an in depth psychological profile on you. It's also mapping
the environment around you, and the camera, together with the
thermal camera, is able to read your heart rate even
when you're not touching the device. Right, If you're not
touching the screen, it's reading your heart so it's got
a very good EKG of you. And let's talk about
the touch screen for a second. If your finger is
on the touch screen, it's getting your bioelectrical feedback, very
similar to what we use for EEGs right brain waves.
And if we have the bioelectric feedback from your finger,
the thermal camera, the light our camera, and most importantly
the ocular camera mapping your rapid eye movements, you can't
even perceive the twitches in your eye as it moves
across the screen. The AI has gotten to a machine
learning has gotten to a point where if I have
those signals, I can infer with a ninety nuns nine
percent accuracy what your brain waves are right, So ninety
nine percent as accurate as if I had the wires
hooked up to your fucking skull. I can predict or
sorry into it using the combined data sources I previously
just talked about. Right, your phone knows how high off
the ground it is. It can tell by what angle
you hold it at, your mood. It's constantly pinging devices
around you. Right, so your Bluetooth is constantly inventoring any
other Bluetooth device that ever comes near you. Right. So,
even if you don't have a social network, believe me,
they have your social network. So with these tools that
they have, your device is learning you first, and it
has more data and more rich data than any psychologist
or psychiatrist is ever going to have. And they get
to ab test in real time. Right. They can show
you this image and then that image, and then they
can gauge what your physiological response is right before your
brain even has a chance to process the image. And
then it gets to get the readout as your brain
processes the image, and then it can compare the emotional
state changes that one image had over another, and then
it can refine, and it can do it again and
again and again until it knows exactly how to induce
certain emotional states. So first it's learning. It's learning you
all the time, and then the fun starts. So remember
it's cognitive warfare is a combination, a hybridization of both
cybernetics and which mccalities can call it cyber warfare and
psychological warfare. Right, it's a synthesis of these two things.
So a lot of the mood states that you have.
If you notice, like the recent Iran thing, right, you
watch some otherwise extremely level headed people that have been
cool and collective about a whole bunch of things in
the past all of a sudden become like panic stricken,
when almost identical stimuli in the past had no such result.
You're basically being mined all the time until they have
such a robust psychological and physiological profile on you that
they can induce both psychological states like that you're conscious of, right,
so panic, anxiety, anger, but also subconscious states that you
are not aware of. It can induce psychological breaks. It
can do all types of stuff, because the goal is
about being able to cognitively impair right or neutralize us.
If Russia, you know, got a hold of our brains
first or whatever. I think that whatever the rationale that
they use to say why they have to do these
things is rarely accurate because it just so happens to
fulfill so many other agendas and things that they're worried about,
which entirely coincidental. I'm sure. But yeah, this is what
I mean by cognitive warfare. It's not psyops. Your phone
isn't trying to like make you you know, your timeline's
not trying to convince you of something. It's trying to
learn you. No, once it does, it doesn't have to
convince you of shit.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, I guess if I could sum that up
in one quote, in one sentence, it's this is the
first sentence of the introduction of this paper as cognitive warfare,
and it is emerging an emerging academic and military concept
that aims to address the exploitation of human cognition and
technology to disrupt, undermind, influence, or modify human decision making.
It is not I mean, it's very easy to say
that it is typical Bernesian propaganda. It's not. It's definitely
something that you can point to and say, yeah, I
mean this helped, maybe this God is going down the road,
But it's definitely not propaganda that goes far beyond that.
Speaker 2: It's trying to get a whole your cognition, right, so
not just yeah. The way is to modify, orient and
alter human reasoning for the purpose of conquest, superiority or
inferiority of individuals, a group of individuals, groups of populations.
It is based on the knowledge of the cognitive process
mobilized by these individuals in the use and the control
of their environment, notably technological by means of digital technologies.
Generally speaking, the aim is to modify the awareness that
individuals have of their reality in order to make them
take erroneous decisions prevent them from taking any decision. Cognitive
warfare is therefore practice of using cognition for the purpose
of military superior reority. Cognitive warfare is part of the
following human and social science, human factors, methodology and engineering,
theoretical models of cognition, and the cognitive process on which
we intend to act. But in order to act or
to protect military or civilian actors, operators or decision makers,
soldiers or commanders, citizens or elected officials from deliberate attack
on cognition, it is necessary to understand the phenomenon and
the information processing of the brain, from simple acquisition of
data from the environment to use of most of the
sophisticated semantic memories, from the control of gestures to decision
making and complex situations. All of these are cognitive processes
that allow humans to live reasonably in the world. The
impairment of the cognitive process has too harmful concert this
contextual maladaption, resulting in errors, misgestures, or temporary inhibition to
lasting disorders which will affect the personality and transform its victim,
locking him or her into a form of behavioral strangeness
or inability to understand the world around him. It's a
little different than psyops, a little different than propaganda.
Speaker 1: Where where is that in the top?
Speaker 2: Oh? This is a This is a different one. I
think I sent I think I like three or four
of them. Okay, this is I'm gonna drop it in
the chat.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: This one is titled Cognitive Warfare The Future of Cognitive
document or dominance. Ah okay, yeah, And this is like
that's from the This is apparently like a sub section
of a much larger document. It's chapter four. What is
cognition and how to make it? One of the ways
of war. There were basically folk Yeah, there you go
brain in digital technology. Interesting.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and this is this is not something that is
their their intent on. This isn't them selling you a war.
This isn't them selling you something that's temporary, something that
they are they're looking. This is them looking to own
you for the rest of.
Speaker 2: Your life or break you.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I mean, and I think I think we
see that. Actually, I think I think we we see
that that it normally a person is broken. I think
when they're fully convinced they've only there's only one solution,
that there's only one thing going on, and that there
is only one there's only one string pullar.
Speaker 2: Well, see that's this is another thing. So one thing
that cognitive warfare seeks to create is obsessions about one
or several modalities of action to they're therefore preventing that
person to see any other methods of action. Right, So
basically get you to hyper focus in a way that
you are unaware of. Right, So, at a subconscious level,
you're basically get given you're being given obsessive compulsive disorder,
a very particular type, and it revolves around inherent biases
or given in play at biases one of the two. Right,
So they'll either take what's already there, and this doesn't
involve like another person sitting on the other end learning
you and trying to figure out what the best strategy is.
This shit's all automated, right, This is what I'm saying, Like,
how much effort it puts into learning you, like your
device and the algorithms on the platforms you use, Ninety
percent of that is learning you, all right, and once
you check off certain boxes or pe checks off different boxes,
it'll automatically implement an algorithmic strategy of exploiting our specific
psychological profile all by itself. Like there is no human
actor like looking through your phone trying to plan the
best way to fuck you up. It's just going to
do it. But getting you to hyper focus on certain
aspects and particularly certain options available to you or basically
moves on the board. They know that once they effectively
do that, all the other moves on the board become
invisible to you. This is happening at a subconscious level.
So yeah, anytime you start seeing people hyper focus on
only one pathway or only on one threat actor, it
is the definition of one of the things that this
type of stuff is meant to accomplish.
Speaker 1: I liked how they basically say in all of the
papers that and and the papers that have examined this paper,
that it almost seems as if they're less worried about
military warfare against a foreign enemy anymore. It's the domestic
enemy that they're worried about.
Speaker 2: One hundred percent. They want to be able to control
control the whole hierarchy of thought. Right. So something that
we're going to hear a whole bunch is called neural ophthalmology.
An ophthalmologist is the guy that works on your vision.
So neural ophthalmology is basically your mind's eye, right, like
your mental vision, the time used to resolve the cognitive conflict, right,
making sure that the time you to resolve the cognitive
conflict is not available for anything else. Right. This is
talking about like directing it on a specific vote, a
specific hyper focus, whether that be on an actor or
whether that be on an option. Right, So whether it's
a certain person on the game board or certain moves
on the game board, right, the goal is to get
One of the goals of this is to get them
to hyper focus right and then basically use up the
time to resolve the cognitive conflict, so that time is
not available for anything else, and that the conflict often
becomes obsessive engaging. Also your future reasoning. Cognitive energy is
directed towards surface problem solving. I'm sorry. The cognitive energy
directed towards surface problem solving increases and the psychological cost
increases and reduces the resources to be allocated to other
important tasks. So this document is going to suck because
it appears to be very poorly translated from French. So
I promise it's not just my shitty reading abilities. It
is also very poorly translated. Hierarchies of cognitive dominance. This
is that's not as important, all right, but is the
what is if you scroll down to page four dash eight,
so you're four, you're a four point three, you're on
a four point eight. It'll be right after yeah, right
after this, there you go. Is what is cognition and
how to make it one of the ways of war.
The higher cognitive level is mainly involved in semantic strategies
using language or symbolic meanings. This is the level of
explicit consciousness or represented unconscious phenomena of mental images and
sophisticated representations. It sometimes competes with the lower lower levels
of cognition, right, with the use of automatisms or rules
learned in a voluntary effort of bit of orientation. Basically,
what he's saying is when he's talking about the lower levels, right,
he's talking about like basically you know, reflexive type of stuff. Right,
So we're talking like brain stem stuff, so stuff that
has operated on like you're not thinking about breathing, but
yet here you are breathing that type of stuff or
reflexive things like if I jump out and scare you,
your body's going to go through a certain your brain
and body is going to go through a certain subroutine
of things that it was going to do, no matter
how many times I jump out and scare it. It's
just it just goes into the motion. So that's what
he's talking about. And most importantly, like I know I've
mentioned this on some of our conversations about uh, the
spiritual dynamic of the fight and the occult methodologies be
used to wage it against us. I talk about like
the importance of words and how they basically don't they
don't do They're not trying to convince you of a
topic or another topic like this is actually very occult
in nature, which is very interesting because like let's just say,
like what the cobbylists. One of the things that they're
trying to do is they're trying to build for you
a whole paradigm, right, not just like convince you of
this thing when it's really that thing. They want to
build a whole little world for you to move right
on in a whole Star Wars universe, for you to
make yourself a character in. In that way you've typecast
yourself into a role, and that means they know how
you're going to act, no matter what piece of stimuli
is given to you, no matter what the event is. Right,
Like if a Prius driver slams on his brakes in
front of any one of our guys, our guy is
going to immediately have a whole mental image of who
that Preus driver is, like all of the repugnant things
about them and their beliefs. Like just seeing a Prius,
our guys automatically backfill all the other stuff. Where did
that stuff come from? It's the same exact thing as if,
like you know, some shit lib sees a forward excursion
like rolling coal out of stoplay, that person thinks that
they know everything about that the driver of the car,
all the reasons to hate them, right, Like, you can
introduce any piece of stimulus and you can guarantee the response.
What affinity they'll show certain groups based on xyz stimulus,
What animosity? And all of this is built using words.
This is why, Like when Donald Trump came along, right,
all of the fucking normy Khans just saw their society
getting vamporized away from them, and they couldn't put their
finger on what the fucking problem was. They all knew
that they had one, they knew things were getting worse.
But when Donald Trump came on stage and used the
word globalist, it unlocked the little key in their brain. Right,
a single word broke up heart a large chunk of
their paradigm and allowed them to start making moves that
they weren't able to make before, started to identify targets
they couldn't identify before. Like, so much of this is
built on fucking words and the paradigms. People build each other,
or sorry, build themselves.
Speaker 1: Well here's, uh, you know, here's the part that uh,
you know, people may not think of because we have
a tendency to make this all about us. But I
mean this is politicians aren't the ones doing this. This
is being done to them too.
Speaker 2: One hundred percent. I'm glad you picked up on that
one hundred percent. They are the target of this just
as much as we are.
Speaker 1: And you know, I think some thing that even normies
are starting to figure out is, especially after the Ted
Cruz interview with UH with Tucker Carlson, is Ted Cruz
may went to Harvard. He may have been in the
debate society, but he is I don't know that that
interview showed that he was bought and paid for by
the Israel lobby, like they have videos and pictures of
him that he has, you know, the one point six
million dollars that they've donated to him, which honestly is
not a lot of money in politics. I think that
it is just that he is as control his mind
is as controlled as most peoples are. M Yeah, I
mean that's not one hundred percent of it. Sure there's bias,
there's things that he's heard. There are quote unquote experts
who've come to him and said, I'm the expert on this.
You don't know anything about this. No one in your
office knows anything about this. But this is what's happening.
This is what you're looking at, Like a mushroom cloud
in Washington, DC kind of thing. Yeah, sure that happens.
But also someone comes to me and says that I'm
gonna be like, go fuck yourself. Let mean, I don't
believe this, but I can read through this bullshit.
Speaker 2: Yep.
Speaker 1: Most people can't.
Speaker 2: Yep. And do you see like those huge like it's
it's like Tuck. It's like Tucker would throw out a
question or a series of facts and you could you
would watch Ted Cruz's like brain hit a fucking wall right,
like a wall that he was unexpected, like he was
not expecting to hit right like Tucker. Like they're having
a back and forth and back and forth, and Tucker
won't say something, and you'll just watch Cruse like lean
into say something and then just stop, like just mentally,
he somebody built a little wall for him that he
didn't know was there until somebody poked him from a
certain angle and he spun around to go respond to
it and literally hit a fucking wall. Somebody built that
wall in his brain, Like there were just huge gaping
holes in his worldview that never seemed obvious to him
or really anybody else, and all Tucker had to do
his point at this gaping hole, and he literally was speechless.
You could see that he physically never fucking thought of
that before, and he had to be like dragged over
the line to see the incongruency, right, to see the
fallacies in his own worldview. He had never like that
tells you that is a good bit of evidence that
that portion of his worldview was constructed by someone else,
because if it was organic, it would have been much
deeper and much richer in experiential data. Right, he wouldn't
have just fucking flatly stuttered like that, because he would
have had all of the thoughts and memories that led
him to that opinion. But basically what you saw is
a guy that had an opinion and had no idea
why he had that opinion, and really no idea how
it got there because you kind of see him looking around, right,
Which is where if somebody calls you, like if I say, Pete,
I think this, and you're going to say why, like rapidly,
I am going to backtrack in my head exactly how
I came to that conclusion, and I'm going to relay
that information to you, well, Pete, this is actually why
I think this. He didn't have any of that. People
don't understand how this has been going on for a
lot longer than NATO put it into doctrine, because the
tech now in everyone's hand has given them the ability
to do this in a hyper focused, hyper specific way.
Back when they only had the fucking TV, they would
have to basically, you know, do buckshot strategy, hoping that
they hit the most people with it. But there are
always going to be people that you know, had a
slightly different psychological profile where that that basically it wouldn't land.
That's how you get people like you me, our dear
departed friend, you know z Man. Right, The older guys
that were born that we weren't Internet native, right, We
had regular TV and shit, and the Internet didn't come
around in a big way until we were already kind
of developed. Like I didn't start using the internet really
till I was in high school. I think what like
my sophomore year was when I, you know, I would
spend more than like an hour a day on the
Internet and actually use it for like spending free time.
They didn't have the ability to get us like they
have the ability to get people now where they can
individually tailor that program to each individual persons psychological profile.
Ted Cruz was just you know, just an example. But
we see his behavior on the timeline all the fucking time,
don't we.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, yeah, I heard, you know, not to
keep bringing up Tucker, but I mean his last five
basically interviews have been like going after zog without without
naming them. Yeah. He had Marjorie Tayler Green on there
today and they were bringing up like that, the guy
who lives down by down in Florida, Randy Fine, who
someone posted a picture, someone posted a picture of a
you know, a baby just you know, look like a
burnt ragdoll, just dead, you know, and he was like
more of this. Well, I mean, uh, you know, I
would say it really, if somebody wanted to do a
look at a historical example of cognitive warfare, it would
be how Jews are raised.
Speaker 2: I was about to say that you yeah, no, that's
one hundred percent correct, because what are they do. We
haven't gotten to the part about inducing trauma yet. Yeah,
but that's exactly what happened. You know. It's funny is
that all these conspirat hard guys. I mean there's actually
a little bit of conspiratard, and all of us on
the right, I think because you had to you had
to have a little conspiratorial thinking to get here. Wait
a second, you mean to tell me two planes knocked
down three buildings, get out of here. Just a little
bit of alignment, Like, are you sure that's exactly how
World War two went down? You know, it seems to
be a part of a common trait. But the Conspiratord,
like the dedicated Conspiratord guys, talk about Toronto based mind
control all the time, and yet they can never actually
put their finger on the group of people that are
actually doing it right, all their conspiracies that they know
inside and out, because they think they've been researching conspiracies,
but they've actually been getting programmed, like they g Edward
Griffin has a blind spot the size of the fucking moon.
So many of these guys do.
Speaker 1: But if you especially the Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve
guys hookline and.
Speaker 2: Yes they have no idea it was I think you
were talking to somebody recently about and obviously doing a
very enjoyable job at least to listen anyways of beating
up on libertarianism, and you talked about like how they
will assert these these facts or sorry, they will assert
these things, certain things as facts, but will have absolutely
no factual evidence to back up the thing that they
just asserted as a as a fact. Like if you do,
like obviously, if we fix the money, all of this
other stuff is just solved.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, if you fix the money. If we fix
the money, then degeneracy will go into decline one.
Speaker 2: Well, you're asking like, why is that and where is
your supporting evidence for it?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 2: No, bro, it's just obvious.
Speaker 1: That's more. Well, they're just they're giving opinions as fact,
and they the way they can do it is because
they're talking about a subject that they perceive as being
come they're unfixable. So the only way that you can
go is up. And you know, that's that's the whole
thing about once you realize that, like libertarianism is pure
black pilling, and you can't unsee it because they just
assume the worst of everything, and then all of their
answers and all of their solutions I would say ninety
nine point nine percent of them are outside the realm
of possibility.
Speaker 2: Therefore it pre excuses you for not acting on them.
Speaker 1: Correct.
Speaker 2: It gives you morals, but it doesn't give you the
urgency to then act on that moral or then enforce
that morality. All right. They will say, hey, you need
to this is bad because of these morals, and you say, okay,
well those are your morals. My morals are different, so
I'm going to take your shit. Well, no, you can't
do that because of the morals. You say, well, whose
morals are they? Well, they should be everybody's morals. Okay,
well do you think we should impose them? Oh? No,
we can't impose them. So you have a morality that
was given to you. It really is the perfect intellectual.
Like I, I generally am very conspiratorial in my thinking
because most time it's proven by it'll it'll prove out.
It is impossible to look at libertarianism and who the
people that were responsible for its creation and not see
this as anything other than a way to psychologically trap
the most intelligent and generally the people that, if otherwise,
you know, left unmolested, would be the people that would
autistically create change, right, The people that would be the
most of a problem for you, Right, The big people
that would be the biggest thorn in your side. You've
managed to come up with a perfect intellectual cul de sac,
right a a hamster wheel for the autist mind, like
it has.
Speaker 1: They just where they just get to play in in fantasy,
in fantasy, this this yeah, or what let's uh quote
our our frenzy man, it's just astrology for young, high
IQ white guys.
Speaker 2: That's exactly. Yeah, it effectively is it is the perfect
I mean, and again we're now entering a place where
it costs the regime no resources to give personalized horror
scopes to each and every one of us. They will
know exactly what to show us. And like these fagots
are dumb enough to literally have publicly open zoom meetings
about it. You can go on YouTube and you could
watch these NATO clowns talk about this type of stuff
and how they are implementing it, what corporate partnerships they
are working with to make this thing a reality. I mean,
the Canadians are like, I'm actually not surprised at all
at what's happened to Canada because as far as like
the NATO arm that is operationalizing this type of shit,
like in the in the Americas, it's them. I would
say that they are almost They are most likely more
active than our own people, I think, at least in
the NATO stuff, because like the Pentagon doesn't like sharing.
I actually I believe in that document that you had
up before, it actually talks about how the Pentagon was
working on this for quite some time and now NATO
has figured like that NATO has to start implementing this stuff.
Like basically the Pentagon was just doing this and didn't
invite them to the party, and now NATO's like, oh, well, no,
we have to do this stuff too. It's very important
because you're doing it. So yeah, I think this has
been going on for a considerable length of time, at
least since twenty fifteen twenty sixteen, where your device is
actively learning you in real time and tailoring information to
feed you in certain orders. Because do you know what
a do you know what a binary agent is, It's
a biological warfare term.
Speaker 1: A binary agent. Yeah, no good.
Speaker 2: So remember when COVID like COVID came it was a bioweapon,
came out of a lab, but didn't kill everybody, barely
killed anybody, but it did permanently alter every single one
of our immune systems. Any virus that we come in
contact with alters our immune system forever because it's now
basically uploaded data. And then when it sees the same
profile again, it has the data backed up on the
hard drive to be like, oh, well we recognize this,
you know, like just like FBI gets a fingerprint, takes
it back to Langley or sorry to Quantico and runs
it through their database. Oh we got a hit. Your
immune system is basically like that same thing, right, So
once it gets a fingerprint that's stored in there forever,
your immune system is now going to react differently. So
a binary weapon is And this is what I thought
COVID was. It actually scared me quite a bit because
of who the actors that were involved in its creation.
In COVID's creation, yes it's China, but also it's Israel.
The who COVID affects, right, the ACE two binding receptor.
Do you remember when RFK got in a lot of
trouble and after that he had the handler.
Speaker 1: Just thinking about that.
Speaker 2: Yep, he's actually quoting two peer reviewed pieces of NIH research.
He didn't make that up. Our government knew that, right,
like we did the data. We did the research on
COVID after it was you know, let loose across the country,
and we did the genetic stat on it. We know
that the ACE two binding receptor is slightly different for
each ever in every ethnic group, and that COVID was designed,
because we have to say that it was designed. So
I'm assuming I have to. It has to be my
default assumption that the TART, the group that it affects
exponentially more than all the other groups, was the designated
target of it. Because if you're telling me you're going
to design a virus and then or if you're telling
me the virus was designed by someone, and then I
see that it affects orders of like this one specific
group of people orders of magnitude more and they the
virus is able to infect this group of people orders
of magnitude faster and better and more successfully than it
can to any of the other groups. I have to
de facto assume that whoever made this thing designed it
to target these people. So RFK wasn't lying. We're talking
orders of magnitude. So like ten twenty x, COVID was
twenty x more effective at infecting Northern Europeans and eight
times more effective at infecting Southern Europeans. It was barely
effective at all in binding to the ACE two receptors,
i e. Infecting Han Chinese and Ashkenazi Jews. It's not
a conspiracy, that's a fact. You can look it up
on an A and IHS records, you know, PubMed dot gov.
Whatever it is, which is crazy considering how similar we
are Northern Europeans to Ashkenazi's right, we're very, very We're
actually the closest group, the closest genetic capitow group to them.
So how something could be ten x more effective at
infecting somebody that's practically identical means it was engineered to
do that. So that's what freaked me out because I
knew that the Israelis and the South Africans had a
similar type of problem, and for a period of about
fifteen years they worked together on biological research until the
South African government went away and they didn't anymore. Then
it was just them solo. But the thing that they
spent most of their time working on is something called
binary agents. Right, because now the Israelis have no problem
genociding literally all of the Palestinians in front of the
entire world, but twenty years ago. They were a little
bit squeamish about doing that, not the fact that they
were going to do it, but with the entire world
seeing if they could have done it in a way
where nobody saw or nobody noticed, they would have totally
done it. The same thing with the South Africans, which
is based Sorry, I know that's you know, that's hypocritical,
but I'm allowed a little bit as a treat. They
had a similar problem. So a binary agent is basically
a biological weapon that does nothing right. So it gives
everybody a cold, something that happens, you know, twice a
season every year anyways. So when you deploy the biological weapon,
it's very easy for you to deny it, like, of course,
this is not a biological weapon. What are you talking about?
It is a common cold, or it is the flu whatever,
And then it goes away and nobody's really that much
harmed for it, so like, oh, it couldn't be a
biologic weapon. Everybody's fucking fine afterwards, like what are you
talking about? But then let's say a year, two, three
years later, you release another type of cold or some
type of you know, pollen or some type of something
in the food whatever, right to where the combination of
the two your immune system that is now forever changed
because of that cold that you caught to be when
it is when it comes into contact with I don't know,
like a certain type of pollen or a certain type
of this or that basically makes your immune system go
into hyper overdrive and you go into anaphylactic shock and
you die, right like a bee sting or like the people.
The people that are allergic to peanut butter or peanuts
are basically born with one half of a binary agent, right,
they are from the womb, you know, basically ticking time
bombs that whenever they come into con if they ever
come in contact with a peanut, it will their immune
system will kill them. So there are cognitive versions of
what I just described, right, So it's not so much
what information or what pictures or images series of images
that they show you that is actually the thing. Right.
They're building such a complex psychological profile on you that
they know that they can prime you with certain images, content, texts,
phrases literally like trigger words, and that once primed, whenever
they need to almost you know, forgettable image that is
really not significant in any way. Shape or form or
a piece of text that is really insignificant by itself.
When it is shown to you after it is primed,
you will elicit a very strong response. Whether that's strong,
whether that response is panic, anger, rage, anxiety, cognitive paralysis.
It's doing that all the time, right, So it will
show you. Your algorithm will show you. And TikTok is
the easiest to catch out on this because a lot
of work done went into basically mapping TikTok and what
it's doing. Because TikTok. What made TikTok special is how
fast or how good it's learning. Algorithm was not the
programming part. It's just as good as anything else because
the science on how to make you do certain things
or make you feel certain things is pretty well hammered out.
What TikTok was really special at was how rapidly that
algorithm learned you, Like, especially after listening to this conversation
and looking back with a critical eye, or if you
open TikTok now like basically wary of it, you can
literally watch it try and mind read you right, trying
to download your brain. You can feel it's algorithm trying
to data mine your brain. It's a really surreal thing.
I learned all this stuff about TikTok and then grabbed
a friend's phone and use TikTok for the very first time.
And within five minutes I had to put it down
because it was it was really creeping me out because
I felt it literally just scraping my brain. So that's
what made TikTok special. So they know everything that they
need to show you in what order they need to
show it in. And the Pentagon is great at this,
and this is like, this became the doctrine in what
twenty sixteen? Going forward? When was the air Spring? Pete?
Speaker 1: Was that twenty thirteen twenty fourteen, We.
Speaker 2: Had already operationalized the technology back in twenty thirteen. The
Arab Spring was an IIA operation. We had cognitive warfare
specialists on the ground, and by on the ground, I
mean in an air conditioned room in front of a computer.
It was actually able to see this phenomenon.
Speaker 1: It was actually earlier, it was, it was actually earlier.
It was twy ten, December two thousand ten's in December
twenty twelve, so that's actually pretty early. I mean I
don't really I point to the middle, the middle to
later twenty twelve to like where the terminally online phenomenon starts. So,
I mean this was this was even previous that.
Speaker 2: And social media. Remember why they were trying to remember
why all the Arab regimes were trying to ban Twitter
at the time, it was like a big deal, like
how dare you try? And they're trying to stop free speech.
The protesters, you know, were they're trying to take away
their right to to get out to the world what
was happening on the ground and lit wherever it was.
That's not why they were trying to ban it. They
were trying to take down Twitter and Facebook because it
was people's social media feeds that basically were the driving
force behind the Arab spring. It's called interactive Internet activities
or operations I I A. And we've been doing it
for a long time. The easiest example of an IA
operation that we all you know, that we all know
and remember was the summer of twenty twenty, right, George
Floyd and all of that crazy shit that happened subsequent
to his death. I mean, pete, how many black guys
were killed by cops that made national headlines before George Floyd.
Speaker 1: Killed by cops Michael Well you know what I mean, Yeah.
Speaker 2: Technically George Floyd killed himself.
Speaker 1: Well, the Saint Louis, Michael Brown.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and then Trayvon Martin.
Speaker 1: No, Trayvon Martin wasn't killed by a cop though, Oh
yeah yeah, I mean really that's that's that's it. That's
really what I can remember the most, and that was
what really kicked off BLM. Uh. BLM had its had
its beginnings in Trayvon Martin, but really Michael Brown is
what what put them on the map.
Speaker 2: So there was other events, and I mean there were
there are tons like ever since Black Lives, ever since
twenty twenty I've seen, I mean some of them are
the greatest mean fuel that we have. You know, like
remember that crazy lady with the knife, the crazy black
lady that you know came after that cop in the
hallway that he had to put down.
Speaker 1: Lady. Sure, but yeah, I remember.
Speaker 2: Well, Hey, we're our species is the only species of
human that has what I can't remember what the what
the what? The biology term for it is, uh, gender dimorphism, right,
So basically we're the only species of human whose male
and female look, you know, drastically different. And if you
notice all the other species of humans do not have
gender dimorphism, right, Like, can I could you? Could you
tell me the difference if I showed them to you
side by side, an old Chinese man and an old
Chinese woman. Yeah, I mean like they're identical.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well yeah, well yeah, I mean hair normally will
give something away. But yeah.
Speaker 2: Or let's take a let's say about like the Wa Hawkins.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, once you start going, once you start going
in that direction, they all well, I don't want to
say it like that.
Speaker 2: They all look the same. Well, there's very little difference
between genders Africa, are you know, very high up there
in the U. Both sexes physically expressed the same in appearances,
especially when you get on the higher end of I
believe she was in WNBA. Anyways, there's tons of video
of black people chimping out and getting wasted tons. So
why was that specific video something that caused not just
nationwide protests and violence, specifically the violence in every western
country in the world. Simultaneously, Some of the fiercest BLM
riots were fucking in Australia, in the UK and in Paris.
Why exactly why their cops don't even have fucking guns
in a period of thirty six hours, all of these
things kick off simultaneously, just like in the Arab Spring
when all of those things kicked off simultaneously. Because the
population was a subset of the population that had been
identified prior and focused on prior, were primed with certain images,
certain texts, in certain orders that they were basically cocked
and loaded waiting for the trigger, and the algorithm made
sure to put that image. Like I was on social
media at the time when it was happening, I saw
my feeds stuff about the riots before I saw stuff
about the dead black guy. It just I was not
their target audience, so the algorithm never fed it to me.
So cognitive warfare, like the best example of it that
is fresh in everyone's mind is that, right, that's the
most recent, I think, success story of it. Right. It
is to control the decision making processes and the actions
of large wants of the population. Another thing is it's
meant to do for like let's say, dissident groups people
like us, is to monopolize our attention, right, paralyze us cognitively.
And in that document that you have up, it talks
about that specifically. Right, it'll go into all the different strategies.
Speaker 1: Do you know do you know how upset people get
at me because I don't jump on like doing a
live stream about the most current thing.
Speaker 2: Mm hm, you should actually do the opposite. But yes,
they're done.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's like, are you gonna talk about this if
it's if it's a Monday, I'll be like, yeah, well
maybe we can wait, yeah, maybe maybe we can wait
until the live stream on Sunday and find out. It
was like the whole the whole war thing, you know,
the bombing of Iran and everything. Yeah, everybody was like,
I told you so, told you so, and I just typed,
you know, and you know, I got I got hit
with all the accusations of cope and everything. I just
type remember Syria twenty seventeen and when he dropped the
he dropped bombs on an empty on an empty uh
airfield and then declared victory in Syria. Yeah, that's that's
what that's what this is. And everybody's, oh, you're just coping, man,
you're just coping. No, I was right. I don't like
to make predictions. It just seemed, you know, people are like,
don't you know who he is? I'm like, yeah, I
actually do know who he is, and I'm old enough
to have been an adult in twenty seventeen and remember
what happened. Now, Is there a chance that he could,
you know, do more in Iran? Sure? Do I think
he wants to? I don't think he wants to at all.
And it's not because he used the F word. It's
just because he needs to move on and there's other
shit that has to be done.
Speaker 2: M Yeah, I think you and I both called that
right from the very beginning.
Speaker 1: People want to there's this obsession I think. I don't know,
maybe I've talked about it with Dexter that you heard.
It's they have this obsession what it makes predictions and
then being right and it's like that, yeah, but it's
like I don't care. It's like I mean like literally, okay,
so you make a prediction and you're right, okay, and
how much money did that make you? Yeah? It's like
like yeah, you just get to brag, you know. It's
just it's like okay, and then it's like then the
other thing about that whole that that whole scenario was
it's like, oh, you're just coping. No, what you're saying
is is that I'm hoping. I'm hoping that things will
something will get better, the something better will come out
of this and it won't be as bad as it is.
And I think that's very human, and people actually think
that that's like a weakness. Now, if you actually want,
if you actually hope things, and if you think that's
a weakness, that just means that you're expecting everything to
get worse. And sure, if you believe that, then you're
going to you know, you'll be right on and you'll
even rationalize your rightness. But even people who are like
immediately like oh I told you so, Hey, I told
you so, I haven't seen anybody walk in it back
and go, well, maybe I got it wrong, because the
world we live and you move on to the next
thing and everyone forgets m h.
Speaker 2: I think you're the only person I gave my actual prediction.
I think I texted to you. I don't even think
I threw it up on the timeline.
Speaker 1: Well, because people some people just aren't worthy of it. Yeah,
it's just I mean, I'm I'm really like at the
point where I just want to do philosophy episodes because
talking about what's going on now, people are so invested
in shit they have no control over, you know. And
sure there are some people who can chimp out on
the timeline and you'll see some you know, you'll see
public opinions sway away. And I think a lot a
lot of that Trump is like, well, maybe I'm going
to fuck up, you know, fuck up my base and
fuck up fuck up my legacy if I do this
and I do that. I think he's very self interested.
But then again, I don't think self interest is a
bad thing. I think other people's self interest can actually
benefit you. But you know, that seems to be very
adult thinking nowadays when you say stuff like that, because
children will tell you that you're coping, that that's just cope.
Do you remember what cope was? Remember cope and see
you would just tell you would tell your enemy, like
you'd be on the timeline and tell your enemy, you know,
oh cope and seed burrow. And people come at me
and like say, they say I'm coping, and then I
just block them and they say I'm a pussy for
blocking them. No, I'm sorry. I remember that's something that
I say from my enemy. If you come at me
with if you come at me with it, I assume
you're my enemy, and go fuck yourself. You don't have
access to me. It's not a it's not a fucking
revolving door. It's a velvet rope. Bitch.
Speaker 2: Yeah, words matter, like they literally matter in like the
most sense. So whoever's idea it was to start introducing
words we referred to enemies with in our internal discourse.
Just introducing that word into our internal discourse, that just
by itself, if if we would have a graph of
you know, in fighting and conflict without the word, and
then in fighting in conflict with the word, it would
and I would bet a significant amount of money it
would be considerably higher. Like we just got finished talking
about how just words, right control and make up a
huge part of how we understand the world around us,
so much so that it's used against us all the time. Right.
It is. Our cognition is language based, our worldview is
language based, and you should never ever ever like that
what you're doing should be enforced rigorously because you're based.
They're basically to introduce that is by de facto to
create infighting, right because if that wasn't used, if that
was still only used against enemies, that person wouldn't have
had that easy, no think, knee jerk response word to
just hand out for create conflict and who put at all?
Speaker 1: Who put that in their head to talk like that?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Internally spot yeah, who put that in their head?
Speaker 2: The number one goal of psychological operations? And this is
not even cognitive warfare. Everyone has like a deep misunderstanding
of what like PSYOPS is. I I the the Rangers
Psychological Operations Manual is publicly available. I think it's a
public intelligence dot org is good place to find it.
And you'll be surprised when they talk about how like
convincing you of shit that didn't happen, false events, false facts, right,
like false flags ship like that that we think of
when we think of psychological operation. Right, everybody on the
timeline when some crazy thing happened to everyone's like it's
a syop syop syop that represents two percent of their
budget and two percent of their effort. The other ninety
eight percent or ninety five percent, I can't remember which, right.
What they actually do is to sew discord, create conflict
and distrust in targeted groups. That's what SYOPS actually is.
Sewing discord, causing infighting, right, and distrust is what syops
spends ninety five percent of their time doing so much
so that you could say that's their actual job. People
need to remember that, right, and with cognition or attention.
This is another big one is attention monopolization. Right. You're
being algorithmically programmed to focus your attention on specific things,
things that are generally given to you, as in like
you will be primed psychologically to when x y Z
thing is introduced to you, right or xyz stimulus. You
are going to monopolize your attention on that specific thing
and therefore unable to give that attention. Right, So we speak.
In the first case, we speak of a floating attention
with cognitive mobile depending on the characteristics of intensity or
meaning of the signal. In the second case, we define
a directed attention towards expected characteristics of the thing the signal.
From this, we can conceive that attention directed towards target.
Towards a target limits any attentional capacity to other destinations.
One then knows of a world only what one expects
of it. If this organization of the cognitive system protects
against information overload and ensures the efficiency of what is selected,
what is outside of the attention field escapes processing altogether.
This is what we observe, for example, in distracted driving
while using cell phones, or in the tunnelization effect in
air traffic controllers, during which what happens outside of the
focus of the attention escapes the radar operator or driver entirely.
Such examples are to be found in applied psychology textbooks,
and the implementation of visual scanning procedures imposed on operators, pilots, surgeons,
and other experts involved in surveillance duties is systematized in
training courses to prevent this exact thing. These procedures are
themselves very costly in terms of attentional resources burning up
that floating attention. They are very tiring and require collaborative
organizations of the workload with digital devices assisting substitutes, and
monitoring of the human actors that translation. Anyways, the distraction
domain is one of the main aspects of cognitive warfare.
It has two components, attention pollution with the distraction of
focus and the exploitation of digital flaws or digital interfaces
of digital assistance and monitoring tools your timeline. Thus, the
repeated occurrence of multiple alarms with no object of interest
leads the operator to minimize the significance of these alarms,
or even neglect the alarms entirely or disconnect them. Numerous
actsdents have been caused by a do it yourself approach
to the suppression of alarms. In parentheses, cognitive conflict and illusion.
A cognitive conflict is a situation that an individual must
manage by processing information for what a for an expected
purpose that is not consistent with what the information allows
him to do. This is the case when the processing
is incompatible with the expected result or raises a cognitive
ambiguity that the subject cannot simply resolve. For example, in
this case, for an ambiguous shape that is perceived mutually
incompatible with other shapes, or that lead to the subject,
or that lead the subject into a task that is
impossible to resolve. I can think of a lot of
that lead the subject into tasks that is impossible to resolve. Huh,
that's interesting. The time used to resolve the cognitive conflict
is not available for anything else, and the conflict often
becomes obsessive.
Speaker 1: So not just.
Speaker 2: Consuming cognitive resources in the present, but guaranteeing the consumption
of cognitive resources in the future. Cognitive energy directed towards
a surface problem, increases the psychological cost and reduces the
resources to be allocated to other tasks. We are as
much a victim of current thingism as the NPCs, except
for they don't know they are, but are, and we
are but don't know that we are. All of the
current thing is, whether it's the Iran thing, and I'm
a victim of this too. All right, all of this
makeshift event, right because we're all just viewing this on
our devices. None of us are on the ground in
any of these places. So one could concoct rather simply
a non event that monopolizes the attack. And then also
you would implant little problems in it, right to do
that cognitive conflict thing that becomes doubly tasking. So you're
basically taking up all of this person's cognitive time and resources,
as well as all their attention and resources. The brain
has a finite amount of attention span and cognitive capacity. Right,
So this is the thing. I got a little distracted before,
which I never ever ever do and I never ever
ever get sidetracked ever, but I just happened to do
it once. Just then. I was talking about trauma and
what they go on to talk about is inducing a
level of punctuated extreme stress right to basically disorient or
put you in a mode of thinking where all of
your cognitive reason and attention is gone. Right Like, if
I put this looming threat above you, whether it's real
or not, you are now thinking at the base level
of thought, right, the type of thinking where like if
I were to just jump out and scare the shit
out of you, right, like, you're on muscle memory, all
the cognitive all the reasoning, all of that shit that's
turned off right now because there's a looming threat on
the horizon. So all your attention is on this threat,
and all your cognitive capacity is turned off. Right, You're
operating on subroutines now, base level programming. So just by
this one looming threat that I just pop onto your timeline,
I now basically remove your ability to rationally think about
it and then guarantee that you burn up all of
your attention resources on this fucking pinata I just hung
in front of you. So you're basically retarded, and also
you're hyper focused on something that I control. And if
I do this repeatedly, if I put you in a
sustained period of stress, right, I am reprogramming your neural pathways.
I am remember how we talked about in the beginning
of this document, when I talked about causing permanent harm
to enemies in cognitive warfare, right, basically making the effects
of the attack permanent. If I keep you under a
stained level of stress, or if I just repeat this process,
I can do it in a number of ways. Right where
I'm not even showing you the same information. I'm just
showing you a post here, a post there, or whatever
that just references that thing. I don't have to show
it to you anymore. Just reading a post that tangentially
references that thing keeps you in a state of suspended
stress that you aren't even aware of. And I am
rewiring your neural pathways. And after a couple months, you
are now severely cognitively damaged. You are factually less smart
than you were. Your reasoning abilities are literally reduced. Your
attention span that you can devote to specific tasks that
you want to work on has been reduced materially and forever. Right,
So I've rewired the way that you think, and I've
permanently brain damaged you. In the most literal sense. I
have reduced your cognitive capacity permanently. The longer I keep
you in this state of stress, the more damage I do. Right,
I can control your sleep schedule even by flashes in
your phone that happened so fast that you can't even
see them or notice them. There are lights that they
sell to hotels. They've only just started to catch on, right,
but they're usually for international like hubs, so like a
couple places in New York have them, a couple places
in Dubai and basically the places where you're stuck, you know,
going there for work for a couple of days in
lead or like layovers. Right, and their lights that when
you walk in you can either opt into this or whatever.
But let's just say everything was opted in. Right, You
walk in and it pings your phone to figure out
what your home time was, right, what time is it
where you came from, and while you're asleep, it will
flash the LED lights in the room while you're asleep
and reprogram your circadian rhythm, and you wake up without
jet lag. You have changed their the most important clock
in the human body got reprogrammed by flashing LED lights. Anyways,
so they can keep you in this state of stress
for a considerable amount of time, long enough to where
they can guarantee doing damage. So I mean, I think
Pete having some technical issues, So I'll just run it
out and we can talk about some useful stuff, right,
policing your headspace, and we'll probably have to do a
follow up episode strictly on cognitive security. But the thing
that they're most trying to do above all, besides causing
you permanent cognitive damage, right, basically lowering the mental capacity
of their enemies, is this attention monopolization. They want to
throw pinada after pinata after pinada at you, whether it's
this current thing, this event, or we're debating, whether it's
you know, it's cool to be a wife guy or
not a wife guy. You just got your enemy target
talking about something nonsensical for a week or two weeks,
all right, That a sow's distrust and discord. But most importantly,
you monopolize the attention of an entire distributed network of
individuals for weeks. That means there's weeks of no political organization, right,
no ability for them to actually affect change. Basically, you
removed from the game board any forward steps that they
can take because you monopolize their attention on whether the
fucking wife jack meme you know, in your opinion of
it makes you a wife guy or not a wife guy.
I've got guys that have got three kids arguing with
guys that couldn't get any pussy if they tripped and
fell on it about wife shit for weeks, and the
distrust and the discord once I'm done, will stay there.
The more I get them to distrust each other, the
less likely they are of actually organizing in person and
effectuating any type of change, either locally, regionally, or nationally.
And whenever it looks like they're gonna whenever it looks
like I've done something that pissed them off so much
where they are really starting to mobilize, I'm just going
to introduce a new thing, and I've got pretty much
everybody mind mapped, so everyone is going to get their
own personalized thing. Do you see the type of damage
that this type of thing can do in removing your
ability to create meaningful political change?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, I think I think at this point
the only people who are left listening to this are
the people who would actually even care about that. I'm
assuming a lot of people, a lot of people have checked.
Speaker 2: That possibly I have that effect. I am my own
cognitive warfare.
Speaker 1: Well, I don't think it's you. I think it's They've
had so much cognitive warfare done on them that they
think it's not them.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, or.
Speaker 1: Or there's people who are still listening who are like,
I'm going to keep listening just so that I can
see it in other people. Uh no, you need to
see it in you.
Speaker 2: Yes, Yes, it's just like it's just like in the
spiritual sense, like you will advance nowhere if you aren't
reflecting on your own actions, like as priority number one.
And this is roughly the same thing, right, So, like
the same tools that you're gonna need for spiritual liberation
are roughly the same as what you're gonna need for
cognitive liberation. And it's going to be self examination.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: You're gonna see fucking mistakes that you make. You're going
to have regrets, and you're gonna need to you know,
repent and absolve yourself of them and move on and
not sin again. Right, Like you actually have to make
meaningful change in the way you interact with technology or
you're fucked.
Speaker 1: Yah.
Speaker 2: I figure we should do a separate thing on cognitive
security and basically how to minimize this type of shit
or at least and I can't say, you know, protect
yourself entirely, because you can't. The best you can do
is minimize while you.
Speaker 1: Organize the you know, one of the things that I
think you were talking about. I don't remember if we
were recording when you talked about it, is you know, like,
I'm on I just went over to Twitter X and
I go to profile, I go to home and there's
the free you tab, and there's the following tab. And
if you click following, you're going to see people that
you follow, or there are people you follow who they're resweeting.
Speaker 2: Any chronological order you're told.
Speaker 1: But if you go to for you, let me see.
I let me scroll and see in. I don't make
it ten before I get hit with Miloianopolis fifteen, I
get hit with right Wing Watch twenty, I get hit
Joel Berry.
Speaker 2: Oh, I want to do this experiment too. That's a
good idea.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's Mark Levin. Oh yeah, you're getting your rage,
bab Yeah, you're just getting yeah, and it's just to
keep you getting And I comment on like Mark Levin
to insult him, and then I move on. It's completely
just an insult and then I move on. But you know,
I mean I'm doing I'm not sitting there and wait
ooh who's commenting on this and what are they going
to say? And everything like that. I try to be
a little strategic when I go after people who are
just you know, obviously rage baiting. You know, throw throw it,
like a link, to throw a link to a good
article on like the founding of Israel or something like that.
You don't sit there and argue with fucking people who
you know. And I mean I am guilty of this sometimes,
but you don't spend all day arguing with people who
have like they they have. Here's you want to know
an easy way to tell one of these accounts if
they follow two to ten times more people than follow them,
those are accounts that are there to distract you and
they're programming you for something. Because nobody does that.
Speaker 2: Oh that's so very that's a very good metric.
Speaker 1: Yeah, nobody does that. And if you go into the ratio,
it's like, I mean, say they have like a thousand followers,
you're looking to see that they're following two to two
thousand people or more. If they have if they're in
like if they have like one hundred followers and they're
following like two or three thousand people, you're dealing with
an agent or an AI or AI and they're going
to have you can find. All you have to do
is go look at a Tucker carls pick up a
pick a random Tucker Carlson tweet or you know he's
saying something smart, and just scroll and don't read the comment.
Just click on the click on the profile and look
at the profile. What you're going to find is seventy
to eighty percent of Twitter is completely fake.
Speaker 2: Do you remember when they when Elon Musk was buying
in the process of buying Twitter, I remember, do you
remember one of the reasons he threatened to back out?
Speaker 1: I don't dead in in a theory bots, I don't.
Speaker 2: Remember, basically bots, right, So he at this point was
a shareholder in Twitter, so when he wanted to blow
up the deal, because remember he threatened to blow I
think he was just threatening to blow up the deal.
He was like, we have had reports there is credible
evidence that forty percent of traffic on Twitter, forty the
accounts on Twitter are bots, and therefore Twitter is misrepresenting
its current and future ad revenues. It's worse, and that
means they're lying to you know, shareholders. So I want
out of this deal. And it really wasn't to get
out of the deal. It was basically to put them
in a fucking bind, like you either take the deal
or I sue the shit out of you because I
know that this is true. And we never got a
resolution to that because he bought the com so it
never got to get proved out in court. But I
guarantee you that it was the case of at least
forty maybe higher.
Speaker 1: It's higher. Chance's a crazy thing, it's higher. Now, there's
all you have to do is just pick the big
accounts that the big accounts that are like criticizing Israel.
Pick a big, a big account that criticizes Israel or
criticizes the bill, and you're not only going to see
like left wing account left winging accounts like this. There
are maga accounts like that, pure mega accounts. I mean,
it is it it. This is meant to fuck with you,
that's all it's meant to do. And a lot of
people don't realize it, you know, And it's like I mean,
I used to spend so much time on Twitter. I mean,
like it's like hours upon hours upon hours, and I mean,
really scroll my timeline now is see how often I
you know, I asked anyone, see how often did I
go on there? It's just I mean, and if I do,
I'm I'm normally saying just something snarky, something snarky, yeah,
I mean, And that's and that's just basically the way
I've lostem.
Speaker 2: The most black pilling thing that happened to me in
a long time, Like, it wasn't any of like the
Israel stuff, for the Trump stuff. It's when Elon said
that he was basically going to monetize Twitter, right, that
he was going to pay posters. That was the most
black pilling thing to me. Ever.
Speaker 1: It's absolutely the worst. It's absolutely the worst thing. I mean,
it's you.
Speaker 2: You know, now you can run botnets for free, because
before botnets were expensive, right, you had to pay for them.
But by injury a revenue share to where you're paid
for the very activity you basically create. You know, we
call it round tripping, round trip accounting. So Enron was
doing this type of shit, but you've created like round
trip accounting for botnets. So now you are subsidizing and basically,
since you're the one that directs that paycheck, you can
now demonetize foreign bot nets and basically make your own
botnets cost free. You're recycling the same money right whatever
you're paying, and whatever the botnets are costing to run,
you're literally paying them right back. And you're basically taking
ad advertisers money to run your botnets cost free. And
you're also turning people into bots. You're taking the whole
Indian subcontinent and turning them into bots because they don't
give a shit. They don't care about American politics. Literally,
in like that episode that you did with that Indian guy,
they will literally say whatever gets them paid. So you're
creating you're basically having this cognitive machine turn them into
human bots where they just say whatever they need, like
whatever the thing is that pays the most, or whatever
the current thing is. You've just turned half the Indian
subcontinent into current thing bots. Like why even run a
Like Everyone's like, oh, this is like a robot like thing,
like it's an AI. Like now it could just be
an Indian guy and it's effectively no different because this
type of shit works really well in the third world, right,
this cognitive warfare stuff. Another thing that the cognitive warfare
thing talks about is how it's not just used by nations.
They even document that it's also being the same methodologies
and attacks are being used by corporations and non state actors.
So the cats out of the bag, right, it could
be your own government trying to program you at the
same time as it could be Microsoft or Amazon or
fucking North Korea. It doesn't matter, Like the methodology is
out there now, Like I take I don't know if
I know, p You've noticed, Like I will take whole
days off of Twitter, mm hmm, yeah, and I have to,
And like Pete, what you do is awesome, Like I think,
actually everyone on the right wing should just disappear every Sunday,
right like church and then no Twitter. And then if
anybody catches, like anybody on Monday goes back on, you know,
goes back and see that you're posting on Sunday, needs
to like publicly shame you. Because without if you're in
the soup every day, even for a little bit, you
have no baseline, right, there's nothing to compare, Like you
won't be able to know when you're being manipulated because
you have nothing to compare it to. There is no
baseline to reset. It's it's super important and the only
way to enforce that type of policy is to everybody
pick a day. I think Sunday works because we're also
trying to make sure you guys are going to church. Yeah,
like anybody that shares gore. If somebody's sharing gore on
the timeline, they need to be blocked immediately.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, I mean even even the the Gaza stuff
and everything. No, I mean, I remember when the whole
Haitian thing was going down, people were like sharing this
video of like these Haitians that were killing this cat.
You all got blocked. You all you want to if
you if you're if you shared that, you're wondering why
you got Why I block you? There you go, there's
no what fucking world do you live in that you
think sharing that, putting that in your fucking mind is
good for you. Oh well, I'm in a war and
I need to see what they you what? Then you
look at it, I'll share it with us.
Speaker 2: Motherfucker wrong with PTSD before it even kicks off.
Speaker 1: Half these people already half the people I fucking interact
with on Twitter. I already do have PTSD. Yep, half
them have PTSD and half half of them have PTSD,
and half of them have have convinced themselves that they're
a soldier in a war because they're posting with an
a on Twitter. Oh good for you. Wow, you just
called you just you just called somebody who has woken
up more people to the JQ than you ever will
a Jew because they disagreed with you on something. You're
You're retarded, people aren't nowadays.
Speaker 2: Again, you're introducing language that was only reserved for enemies.
Speaker 1: I mean.
Speaker 2: That should be every one of us should block anyone
that does that immediately. And if we do it, we
know that we deserve to get blocked like people need to.
Speaker 1: Fucking When I come across somebody, When I come across
somebody who I've never interacted with, who's blocked me, I
know why they blocked me because they saw somebody shared
a twite of mine that they saw and they decided
that I was their enemy. Yeah, I'm perfectly fine with that.
If you come at me or I see you attacking
my friends when you should know better, you're going to
be blocked and it's not because I'm a pussy, and
it's not because I'm a it's because you're a faggot.
Because you you don't know how to play the fun.
You don't know how to fucking play this game. You're
not you're not a part of whatever, what what this
thing that we're doing. As Thomas would say, you're not
a part of it. Where not Jehovah's witnesses don't want
you on the fucking team.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you just failed tryouts.
Speaker 1: You're literally I mean, these are people who are stormy.
I understand why you're anonymous. These are people who are
literally anonymous because they because they think it's like cool.
What do they have to lose?
Speaker 2: What?
Speaker 1: They're there? Their parents are going to kick them out,
I mean seriously.
Speaker 2: But yeah, Jay Burden is shaming a lot of people
right now without intention, without the intention of doing it,
because he literally is the sweetest person in the world
and is basically an emotional woman. Sorry Jay, and he's
got a lot more going on than I would say
ninety percent of the people that are a non all right,
that are just doing it to Again, I hate that, like,
I hate that it's cool. I hate that our thing
is cool. And the more cool it gets, the more
of a disaster it's going to be that it's cool
because now it gets to be a fashion accessory. Like
I think it's going to get to a point where
I'm only going to deal with people that are face
facts or that I personally know.
Speaker 1: And have met. Would Yeah, that's a pretty much way. Yeah,
that's pretty.
Speaker 2: Much as I have gotten. Yeah, if you're if you're
a non I need to know that you have like
that you can have serious material loss, right if if basically,
if if you were IDD or whatever. Now it probably
just made myself a doc target. Who cares? I mean really,
at this point, we're we're getting to a point where
I mean, Astro and I talked about this happening like
five years ago and or sorry not five years ago,
like two or three years ago, and we thought it
would be like ten or fifteen years down the road.
I mean, like you probably thought, like the shit that
you see on the timeline now coming out of like
normal people, you never would have thought that you would
see in your lifetime, right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, imagine the JQ being publicly discussed.
Speaker 2: Yeah, by the biggest pundits in the country. Yeah, Like
I never thought I would live to see this, but
I like hell of a lot faster.
Speaker 1: But I think there's someone, there's someone who's listening who
thinks it's that they had something to do with it
because they called you a jew.
Speaker 2: I won't even call Nick Fuentez that. I won't call
Adam Green. Now, well, Adam Green kind of like that,
but that's that's a physiognomy thing with him. But like
I won't, I won't call anybody but somebody that outwardly
expresses that that is who they are, Like I don't.
I don't think we should use terms that we identify
enemies with internally. And like there's a there's a lot
of things in this NATO doctrine that people need to
take in. I encourage everybody to read it. Pete, I'll
give you a bunch of links that you can put
in the show notes to this type of stuff. And
we need to actively critique ourselves. If we catch ourselves
doing shit, which everyone's going to do, we need to
make a mental note of it. We need to make
sure we don't do it again. And we should be
blocking everyone. Honestly, if we could just get a new Twitter,
that's just our guys, we like one big group chat.
You would be able to effectively organize infinitely more than
you can on Twitter. That doesn't mean like, that's not
the same thing as me saying like you can get
the vice president to do shit or the president to
do shit, which I mean materially we have seen not
with the Iran stuff so much. That's ambiguous because of
the state of our military production and things like that.
There's lots of reasons why we wouldn't go to war
with Iran. But the thing about the curtailing the deportione
deportations just a little bit for agriculture and hospitality. He
backed off on that and reversed course one hundred and
eighty degrees in seventy two hours because of pushback he
got on social media, Which is great, all right, we
can push back against the administration and keep them on
the straight and narrow to some degree, but that is
not political organizing. So for political organizing, you have to
remove the ability for the enemy to distract you and
to occupy your attention, because they will just endlessly feed
you just controversy after attention, fucking hijacking tool after controversy,
like they will make it physically impossible for you to
think of anything else, right, if you're thinking of shit
that you saw on the timeline, once you put your
phone down, you fucked up. Like people can't even keep it.
We're all in space quiet.
Speaker 1: And we're all freaking guilty of it.
Speaker 2: Yep, yep. But I don't see us being able to
be effectual until we a realize what the enemy is doing,
the scale that they're doing it at, and coming up
with Generally, organically, we have a way of just you know,
like retard invention, Like there's lots of things that the
enemy does that a bunch of disorganized, decentralized retards somehow
figure out ways of undoing, which is one of my
favorite things about this sphere. But we need to recognize
what they're doing, call it out so everybody sees it,
and then we need to come up with solutions to
stop it. And everyone should be putting a fucking piece
of paper or a sticker over their camera phone, the
front facing camera, like everyone needs to be doing that shit. Unfortunately,
you know, it's probably not gonna stop the lidar. I
don't know, but you need to limit the amount of
physiological data that they take in right. So like you
can't fix the wrapp it, you can putting a camera
sticker over the front of your phone will at least
stop your eye movement data and probably maybe the facial uh,
the facial expression data, right, and that'll go a long
way to stopping them being able to map effectively like
the type of psychological reactions you're having to the information
that they showed you. That'll at least reduce their ability
to trigger emotional states in your brain. Because I mean,
like like with Iran, and I can point to dozens
of other things if I sat down and thought about it,
where all of a sudden, everyone got the fucking panic
switch flipped, or everyone got the the X Y Z
or the it's so over, you know, the despair flip
switch flipped. When you know, once they have you bracketed,
you're fairly easy to hit whenever they want you to
or whenever they want to. And you know, when the
Twitter update happened, and this probably happened with a bunch
of your apps, you'll notice you got to pop up
asking whether it can share data with other apps. Basically,
what that means is that the profile they've built on you,
they've assigned a like a data ID that they are
going to then reconcile with a similar idea that other
apps have. So that means it's basically pooling that psychological
data from every other app that you use to fill
in the blanks that each one of these platforms has.
All right, just like I'm gonna go to I'm gonna
go to my premium features, all right, pull up premium,
give me my analytics, tell me about my audience. It
has inferred that over the past three months, nine point
nine percent of the accounts that follow me are females,
eighty six point one percent or males. Gives me their ages,
and it could give me a lot more data. It's
just not going to but it has a lot more data,
all right. So it has inferred your gender and your age.
Right when you signed up and created your Twitter account.
You didn't tell them you know what your gender was
or what age you were. It's able to figure out
that through all of the other fun things that I
mentioned when at the start of this. So that's just
one basic, basic, basic example of a profile they've built
on who you are. It's not going to share with
me any of the juicy stuff, but I can go
to like data brokers like Yip Data and be able
to get all the shit that I was talking about,
and it's relatively cheap, like all of your psycho like
your psychological profile would probably cost two dollars or less
because that's what Twitter's doing. Twitter is selling it. All
these apps are selling it, and the people that are buying, yeah,
are advertisers, but there are also a lot of the
people that we're talking about. The government doesn't have to
steal your data, it just buys it. This is like
the thing about Palenteer everyone's freaking out about. They go,
They're gonna, you know, spy on you and all this shit,
and it's going to start linking. Like all of these
apps are already doing that, and you don't need to
be sneaky like you know, Edward Snowden and have the
government spy. The government doesn't spy, it just buys. So anyways,
I should probably start talking more on another episode about
security measures, like things that you can do inside your
own life when dealing with technology, whether it's fucking Twitter,
your phone in general, Like there are regimented methods that
you can use to minimize this type of thing on
your brain and you will notice a drastic difference. You
will be able to think much more clearly when you're
off the app or when you're on the app. Right,
your attention span will increase significantly because remember, it wants
to decrease your attention span and it wants to decrease
your cognitive ability. Right, so when it's not trying to
manipulate and focus them on certain things, it wants to
diminish them more broadly. Anyways, I think that's pretty good.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, let's stop there and we'll come back to
the next one. Will ways that you can avoid this
And yeah, I know you have some more tricks on
what we that than just general psychology. Yes, people should
be people should.
Speaker 2: Be Yes, yes, yeah, I will. I will start putting
together so basically defense mechanisms. We've talked about what the
enemy is doing. Now next time we can talk about
what you can do to defend. And anybody listening, somebody
should whisper into Tucker's ear that he needs to do
to Mike Lee what he did to Ted Cruz, Like,
get Mike Lee on the on the show, Tucker, if
you're listening or any of your producers are listening, and
just drag that motherfucker absolute worst.
Speaker 1: Well, I think the one thing I would want people
to realize is is that a lot of people and
I used to think this way too, So I put myself,
I'll include myself. I think that they're going to when
they log onto social media, whether it be Twitter, mostly
even Facebook or again the worst of all, Reddit, that
you're like going to war. You're not. And you think
that you're like prepared and you're ready to go, and
you're not. It's not a war. It is a war.
You just don't realize what the war is. The war
is on you.
Speaker 2: If you're on these apps, you're an enemy territory. Like
everything on this no matter how compy it is, no
matter how much you fill it up with friends, doesn't matter.
This space is meant to hurt you. Like it's not
just a happy app where you just come in out
like it is put there and it's filled with things
designed to hurt you or to diminish your ability to
defend yourself politically or psychologically. I think NPCs are a process. Frankly,
I never thought about it though just the second, but fuck,
I wonder if the amount of person I used to
always say like that there's a certain percentage of people
that are just going to be NPCs, yes, but I
think that number is flexible, and I think NPCs are
something that they can create because if you just look
at them, they're people that have had their attention diminished
significantly and manipulated and their cognitive abilities eroded, which this
does right. Their goal is to make permanent damage, right,
rewire the way your brain think, thanks, and cause permanent diminishment.
I'm sorry to diminish permanently your cognitive abilities. It wants
you dumber for life, and it can do that by
showing you things on a screen.
Speaker 1: So just know that, all right, So the next time,
thank you ste Man, appreciate it. Yep.