Speaker 1: Imagine, just for a moment, a world that's well fundamentally transformed,
a world where all of humanity functions as this single,
perfectly harmonious society, borders gone conflicts just like a distant
barbaric memory, and every single person's job, their occupation, is
perfectly assigned. Everyone contributes. It's all just calm, hyper efficient
global living. And you don't remember life before this. In fact,
nobody does. The media, which is everywhere, constantly reminds you
how wawful things used to be. Overpopulation, devastating plagues, endless
senseless wars, over resources. They tell your memories were mercifully erased.
And this key moment they just call it the event. Well,
it saves humanity from itself. It really sounds like a gift,
doesn't it, Like some kind of benevolent intervention creating this
serene new existence. But then maybe there's a slicker something,
disquieting memory, perhaps brief, fragmented flashes of variance, maybe violence, tension,
things they don't quite fit. You push them away naturally.
I mean, why dwell on deserving images when life is
so much better now, so tranquil, so controlled. Still there
are whispers.
Speaker 2: They call them the event deniers, you know, these bitter
malcontents spreading what the system quickly calls disinformation about some
supposedly better, freer past. And these troublemakers, once they're identify,
they just kandish poof, and everyone knows those other stories, right,
the conspiracy theories about shadow governments, secret tech, UFOs aliens,
there's just that wild, unsubstantiated theory. Is no sane person
actually believes the event was anything but you know, a
divine gift, and it certainly wasn't some elaborate orchestrated conspiracy
something called Project Bluebean. Okay, right, let's unpackt this a bit.
This fantastical, almost unsettling.
Speaker 1: Opening scenario, It isn't just me trying to be dramatic
or some thought experiment. It comes straight from the material
we've been digging into for today's deep dive, and it
really sets the stage for a truly fascinating and yeah,
sometimes chilling theory. Our mission today is to explore a
concept that's just so vast in its a legend ambition,
so percentse in its supposed steps that it basically aims
to redefine reality itself. We'll dig into a surprising origins.
It's step by step blueprint for creating this well seemingly
utopian but deeply controlled world, and maybe most surprisingly how
some of its predictions, it's underlying themes kind of resonate
with ideas, narratives, even technologies we see around us today.
So get ready, we're gonna examine a concept of control
so pervasive it redefines what we even perceive as reality.
Speaker 3: You know what's truly fascinating here right from the start,
so you can feel the deep psychological mechanics at play
creating a whole new reality. It's not just about physical control,
is it. It's about the immense power of information manipulation,
the strategic erasure of collective memory, the intricate sculpting of
perception itself. And this sets such a powerful precedent for
how garments, maybe in its most extreme absolute form, could
try to operate. When it aims to dictate not just
what you do, but your fundamental beliefs, the very fabric
of what you remember. It makes you really think, doesn't
it that the ultimate control isn't over your actions, but
over what you think and what you remember.
Speaker 1: And it all starts, or at least the theory as
we know it. It starts with one man, surge monist. Now,
he wasn't some fringe Internet guy or a self proclaimed
guru shouting wild stuff from his basement. Serge Niss was
actually a respected journalist from Quebec, Canada, known mostly for
his political commentary back in the early nineties. So he
wasn't initially a fringe figure at all. But he felt
something was shifting, a deep unease about where society was headed.
He sensed something significant was happening behind the scenes, something
he couldn't quite tend down. And that feeling, well, it
pushed him to start digging, like really digging. He truly
believed he'd stumbled onto something huge, something that just had
to be brought out into the open. And what he
claimed he uncovered was, well, to put it mildly explosive,
he alleged he'd found a secret cabal of powerful elites.
He gave them this ominous name, the shadow Masters. Now,
the material emphasized these could be interchangeable terms, right, shadow government,
deep state, the military intelligence complex, maybe even the Elmit.
Speaker 3: Right, the label almost doesn't matter as much as the
concept of this hidden controlling group exactly.
Speaker 1: Regardless of the name Monist was convinced he'd found the
real architects of this coming global transformation, so in nineteen
ninety four, he published his investigation laid out this incredibly detailed,
step by step plan, a plan for creating a one
world government and a new world order, and he called
it famously now Project Blue BEAMNAS specifically pointed fingers at
two major international organizations, NASA and the United Nations. He
saw them as key front organizations in this whole grand scheme.
He claimed the UN would be crucial in facilitating elite
influence in every country, basically greasing the wheels for a
global political setup by subtly chipping away at national sovereignty,
centralizing power.
Speaker 3: Making nations more interdependent, less autonomous.
Speaker 1: Precisely, meanwhile, NASA, he claimed, would provide the really advanced
technology needed to turn that influence into absolute, undeniable control.
The claim was that Monus discovered Project Bluebeam would orchestrate
the biggest hoax ever conceived, using advanced tech psychological manipulation
to create an illusion so convincing it would just become
the new reality for everyone, a reality, of course, totally
controlled by this elite few. It's this vision of control
that really leans into the power of technology to reshape
belief itself.
Speaker 3: And if we connect this to the bigger picture, it
becomes really clear, doesn't it. The stated goals of Project
Blue Beam, they aren't just about setting up a new
global government. No, they're fundamentally about systematically dismantling the core
societal structures that have defined human civilization for ages. Manus
identified four main objectives for Blue Beam, all meticulously designed
to make sure everyone's primary loyalty shifts irrevocably to this
new world order. First, he said, was to destroy religion
eradicate existing spiritual beliefs worldwide, because religion often gives people
a moral compass outside of state control.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, competing authority in a way exactly.
Speaker 3: Second, destroy national press, eliminate loyalty to individual nations. Foster
this global identity, which weakens resistance to a single world authority. Third,
destroy the traditional family unit, weaken those foundational bonds, make
individuals more reliant on the state for identity for support.
And fourth, and this one's maybe the most chilling, destroy
individual creative freedom, Suppress independent thought, suppress expression to ensure
total conformity.
Speaker 1: Wow, Okay, that's a pivotal claim because the idea that
those four specific areas religion, national pride, family, individual freedom
are the explicit targets. It almost feels like you see
echoes of that, or at least debates around that in
our current world.
Speaker 3: Does make you pause.
Speaker 1: It really does. It makes you reflect on societal trends,
you know, the erosion of traditional structures, how certain narratives
just become pervasive. It challenges you to ask, are these
just natural societal changes or is there something more I
don't know orchestrated going on. But the story of Surge
Monest doesn't just and with him publishing a book or
outlining a scary theory. Apparently, immediately after his book came out,
he faced really intense harassment. He was followed, surveilled, his
phones were tapped, you know, classic intimidation tactics. Then things
got worse, a knock on the door, but not from
his alleged shadowmasters. It was child protective services. His homeschool
children were taken away.
Speaker 3: Taken away. Wow.
Speaker 1: The official reason given was that the Canadian government didn't
like this, meaning his work, his publications, and the kids
were made wards of the state to get proper public education.
So Dramanas tradically never saw them again.
Speaker 3: That's devastating for someone focused on exposing this huge plan
for control, losing his own children to the state, yea,
it must.
Speaker 1: Have been crushing. Then a few months later, December, another
knock on the door, this time the police. Monast was
arrested for spreading misinformation. Now that claim alone immediately raises
huge questions about freedom of speech runks, especially for a journalist.
Speaker 3: Absolutely that's literally his job to comment and challenge.
Speaker 1: He was reportedly questioned for hours, spent a night in jail,
and then the very next day, Serge Bonis was found
dead in his apartment. Official report heart attack, but he
was only fifty one according to his latest physical Just
months before, he'd been in perfect.
Speaker 3: Health, fifty one and healthy. That's highly suspicious.
Speaker 1: Following an arrest like that, deeply unsettling. This sudden, unexpected
death right after his arrest, right after losing his kids.
Speaker 3: And this brings up a really important point, doesn't it.
When individuals claim their exposing secret government programs, grand conspiracies,
their own fates often become tangled up in the narrative itself.
It adds this layer of tragic confirmation or at least
profound suspicion for people who believe the theory and the
material also mentions that two other journalists who were reportedly
also investigating Project Bluebeam also died of sudden heart attacks,
despite having no history of heart problems early two others,
that's the claim. This unsettling pattern around Monast's death, according
to this information, just adds to the intrigue. It fuels
the very conspiracy he was trying to expose. It paints
the stark picture of the potential risks involved when you
challenge powerful hidden forces.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's such a stark contrast to what we might
expect from whistleblowers today, isn't it. We think of, you know,
publishing books, doing media tours, going on big podcasts, maybe
facing legal fights, sure, but usually having a sustained public presence.
For Monest, it was apparently immediate, severe, and ultimately just
a tragic silencing end. It definitely makes you wonder about
the lengths power structures might go to to shut down
dissenting voices, especially when the claims threaten their very foundation.
Speaker 3: Okay, so let's get into the steps themselves. What's really
fascinating here is the underlying philosophy connecting all of Project
Bluebeam's intricate stages. The architects of this alleged plan, they
seem to understand that a one world government really needs
a single, unified set of values across the entire global population.
This uniform how do you, they believe, would make people
much easier to control? Why, Because there'd be no competing ideologies,
no conflicting loyalties, no alternative stories pulling people away from
the central authority.
Speaker 1: Right, one narrative to rule them all exactly.
Speaker 3: So, Project Bluebeam's ultimate goal is to create a singular
global religion and a one world government, and it starts
by meticulously establishing that shared uniform value system. Every single
step is designed to erode existing beliefs and replace them
with this manufactured consensus.
Speaker 1: So how do you even begin to break down beliefs
that are so deeply held, beliefs that have shaped civilization
for thousands of years. Well, Project Bluebeam supposedly proposes a
really radical first step, dismantling old beliefs through fabricated discoveries.
The method, according to Monest, is to find or more disturbingly,
fabricate new archaeological artifacts, artifacts that would fundamentally discredit existing
religions by providing what looks like hard physical evidence that
their core doctrines are just wrong.
Speaker 3: Doubt, sowing chaos, undermining the very foundations of faith.
Speaker 1: And just to give you a sense of the power
of these kinds of discoveries, even legitimate ones, think about
the Dead Sea Scrolls. Before nineteen forty seven, the Bible
was generally thought to be you know, complete, a finished text.
But then a shepherd in a cave near the Dead
Sea stumbles on these clay jars, and suddenly boom, new
ancient religious texts emerge, things like the Book of Jubilees,
Wisdom of Solomon, Book of Tobit, even the Book of Enoch,
things mentioned in the material. We looked at.
Speaker 3: Texts that weren't in the established canon exactly.
Speaker 1: Now, this didn't fundamentally change core beliefs for most people,
but it definitely made scholars believers too ask, Okay, what
else are we missing? What else is out there that
might challenge what we think we know. It showed how
new discoveries, even real ones, can profoundly challenge established understandings,
create uncertainty, maybe even a hunger for new truths. Okay. Now,
Project Bluebeam, according to Honest, takes that concept and cranks
it up to eleven for deliberate manipulation. Imagine scenarios like
a conveniently timed huge earthquake in the Middle East, an
earthquake that supposedly reveals hard evidence that Jesus never existed.
Imagine the global religious chaos, a crisis of faith for.
Speaker 3: Billions, Or maybe a different earthquake right.
Speaker 1: Maybe one that Unearth's advanced technology buried for two million years,
offering proof that human DNA was like engineered by Aliens
or some other advanced race. The material explicitly says this
would completely undermine not just the story of creation, but
also debunk evolution, hitting both religion and science.
Speaker 3: In one go, destroying all existing origin stories.
Speaker 1: Precisely, The goal, the theory says, is to fabricate any
evidence needed, hide it under a convenient earthquake or some
other disaster, to cause maximum chaos within every faith, every
scientific paradigm, and that chaos creates a vacuum right opens
the door for a new single belief system to rush
in a manufactured truth.
Speaker 3: What about people not swayed by digging up old bones
or weird tech for them. Project Bluebeam allegedly introduces its second,
much grander step, the Big Space Show. This is where
the new God, or rather the fabricated divine figure, makes
its incredibly dramatic entrance through a massive holographic display across.
Speaker 1: The sky, holograms in the sky like planet wide.
Speaker 3: That's the claim. The idea is that NASA and intelligence
agencies have developed tech to project unbelievably lifelike three D
holographic images directly into the sky. And this isn't just
projecting onto clouds. It supposedly involves a complex system satellites,
ground stations manipulating the ionosphere.
Speaker 1: The ionosphere that charge layer way up in the.
Speaker 3: Atmosphere exactly allowing images to be projected onto atmospheric particles themselves,
no screen needed. And the goal, crucially is for these
projections to look like nothing less than miracles, something totally
beyond human understanding. So imagine looking up day or night
and you see Jesus, Mohammed, Buddha, Krishna, all appearing simultaneously,
huge colossal figures speaking in their own languages directly to
their followers across the entire globe. Then comes the shocking
twist they all collectively declare that their followers beliefs are
all wrong, misinterpreted for millennia.
Speaker 1: Wow. Okay.
Speaker 3: Then slowly, kind of yuarally, these divine figures start to morph.
They merge together, pixel by pixel into one single new
Messiah God, a figure the theory explicitly calls the Antichrist.
This single new figure then delivers the message past scriptures
were misunderstood, misinterpreted old religions. They were responsible for turning
brother against brother and nation against nation, en less conflict. Therefore,
they must all be abolished make way for the new Age,
New World religion.
Speaker 1: So converting people not through argument, but through sheer, overwhelming
spectacle seeing is believing on a planetary.
Speaker 3: Scale, precisely a seeming direct intervention by a new unified deity.
Speaker 1: Okay, so what does this all mean? An entire planetary
light show, a divine mashup design not just to amaze,
but to completely rewrite our spiritual understanding, introduce a new
God that is certainly a dramatic all in way to
try and convert an entire planet. It leverages that deep
human need for s spiritual connection, but twists it into
this tool for mass manipulation. But you're right. Even a
spectacular hologram, no matter how convincing, probably wouldn't sway everyone,
especially people who aren't religious or those totally committed to
their existing faith. The theory anticipates that, doesn't it make
sure no one gets left out of the planet, which
brings us neatly to step three, the silent invasion mind
control through electromagnetic waves, acknowledging that, yeah, even the most
amazing hologram show won't convert every single skeptic, especially non
religious folks, are those with really strong convictions. Project Bluebeam's
third step supposedly uses electromagnetic waves to directly interfere with
brain function. This tech would be deployed too and I
quote shape receptions, create emotions and influence beliefs on a
deeply personal inescapable level.
Speaker 3: Like bypassing critical thinking entirely seems like it.
Speaker 1: The material details electronically augmented two way communication where specific
types of waves ELF, VLF and LF waves those are
the really low frequency ones right, can penetrate deep like
submarine communication.
Speaker 3: Exactly, those waves coming from satellites would reach each person
from within his or her own mind, making them believe
their own God is speaking to them from the depths
of their own soul. Whoa.
Speaker 1: These powerful, insidious rays would supposedly be fed from massive
computer databases, databases containing meticulously stored info on every human languages, beliefs,
psychological profiles, everything. The rays would then interlace with their
natural thinking to form what we call diffuse artificial thought,
basically implanting ideas that feel like they're your own. Now.
The material points to research from the seventies, eighties, nineties
comparing the brain to a computer, you know, information in, processing, integration,
response out. But crucially it also highlights confirmed US military
and intelligence experiments with mind control. We know, for instance,
they use sound ways in Vietnam to induce anxiety and
enemy soldiers without them knowing why, sowing fear confusion.
Speaker 3: And the CIA's history.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, the CIA, as the text notes with a
bit of dark humor, use these and all kinds of
other methods to scramble people's brains. Yea, even program them
to be sleeper agents in programs like well MK.
Speaker 3: Ultra, the infamous MK ultra illegal human experiments, drug sensory deprivation,
all for mind control.
Speaker 1: Right, So that history lends this disturbing credibility to the
idea of manipulating human perception with technology, even if the
scale monus proposed is way way bigger. But the really
unsettling part the idea of an inescapable signal. There's mention
of a patented device that can trigger emotions from half
a mile away, and chillingly, the patent supposedly claims that
can piggyback its signal onto any frequency.
Speaker 3: Any frequency, Yeah.
Speaker 1: Implying that every device using electricity creates an electromagnetic field,
making it impossible to escape. Even living totally off the
grid wouldn't help. Radio signals can bounce off the ionosphere
reach anywhere. Imagine a voice or a thought seeming to
come from your deepest self, a profound insight, a divine message,
but it's totally fabricated, imposed, indistinguishable from your own inner voice.
Speaker 3: That really blurs the line between self and external control,
doesn't it?
Speaker 1: Absolutely? And if we connect this to the bigger picture,
the idea of thoughts being implanted directly, not just heard
or suggested, it's profoundly unsettling. It raises fundamental questions about
individual autonomy, you know, free will, the very nature of
our internal reality. If your thoughts aren't truly your own,
then what is Where do you end and the external
influence begin. The implications of that kind of pervasive control
are just staggering. It goes way beyond physical manipulation right
into the core of human identity consciousness. It challenges the
very definition of what it means to be an independent
thinking person. Okay, okay. So the fourth and final stage
of Project Bluebeam. This is described as the most sinister one.
Manus predicted a universal supernatural manifestation with electronic means, in
other words, a staged alien invasion.
Speaker 3: An alien invasion seriously a fake one. It serves as
the ultimate false flag event. It provides this pre planned
excuse for the elites to consolidate power completely. They had
promised to unite the world defend everyone against this terrifying
common enemy, and they need temporary emergency powers to do it. Powers.
The populace, scared out of their minds, would actually beg
for just to feel safe.
Speaker 1: Create the crisis, offer the solution, grab the power.
Speaker 3: Classic playbooks exactly. The plan, according to the information, involves
making humanity believe an alien invasion is imminent, happening right
over major cities, globally. This would provoke nations into using
nuclear weapons and self defense against this apparent existential threat.
Then the United Nations steps in, plays the role of
global peacekeeper savior and requires all nations that launch nukes
to disarm completely once the invasion is shown to be false.
Speaker 1: Shown to be false because the UN staged it.
Speaker 3: Themselves as part of the Bluebeam operation. Yes, that's the claim.
This solusion. The Material States would use both advanced holographic
projections creating these massive, terrifying alien fleets in the sky
and real physical MANI made craft designed to look and
move like UFOs, creating this terrifyingly convincing spectacle that would
basically panic the entire world into submission and disarmament.
Speaker 1: Okay, this is where it gets really compelling, I think,
because the claim is that the groundwork for this deception,
it's being laid right now. Monest almost uncannily allegedly predicted
that high profile military people would start coming forward making
claims about alien encounters, UFO crashes, hidden government projects. He
apparently warned that these so called whistleblowers, far from revealing
hidden truths, are actually spreading disinformation, carefully bringing UFOs out
of the fringe and into the mainstream.
Speaker 3: Conversation, normalizing the idea.
Speaker 1: It's exactly this is described as part of an overarching
agenda supposedly developed back in the fifties, specifically fifty three
to fifty six, to create the specter of a threat
from outer space that doesn't actually exist. The rationale, as claimed,
is chillingly logical. What's the best way to unite the
world under one government? Finally, the end war present a
common external enemy, an attack from some of their species
from some other planet. And if you just look at
current events, I mean the military releasing UFO videos, it's
Congress holding actual hearings on UAPs, unidentified aerial phenomena, news
outlets covering it all with the straight face. These are
all relatively new developments in the mainstream, aren't they And
they fit perfectly into this narrative of creating a logical
context for a future manufactured attack. It's not just some
fringe topic anymore. It's on primetime news.
Speaker 3: The suggestion being this is an organic disclosure, but a
carefully managed narrative.
Speaker 1: Right preparing the public, perhaps for a grand deception down
the line.
Speaker 3: And once that manufactured crisis is over, once the world
is disarmed and terrified, then the ultimate control gets implemented.
The material describes a post invasion world where, once the
threat is over and people are calm, a combination of
holographic tech and radio waves would be used to well
to wipe everybody's brains, erasing all memory of what.
Speaker 1: Came before, a total mind wipe.
Speaker 3: That's horrifying, terrifying prospect, and it supposedly builds directly on
CIA brainwashing techniques developed and perfected during MK Ultra, as
the text explicitly states, implying a refined global application of
those awful experiments. So with every mind on Earth effectively
a clean slate, the new world order could truly begin.
Families dissolved, people wouldn't remember them. Individuals would willingly and
peacefully comply with whatever information is transmitted directly by Project
Blue Beam. The shadow masters would have boots on the
ground ready to inventory everyone, knowing who they are, where
they lived, their jobs, and crucially what they own.
Speaker 1: Because you wouldn't remember owning anything.
Speaker 3: Exactly, all assets ceased. People would be assigned housing, in
a job, money obsolete. Everything you need is provided. This
new imposed life would seem perfectly natural. Any other way
of living, private property, personal ambition would seem primitive and chaotic. Meanwhile,
the wealthy elite, the ones running Blue Beam, they'd keep
their memories, live in luxury, ensuring compliance by providing just
enough food and a constant stream of propaganda. Anyone who
dissents swiftly disappeared, homes, businesses, cameras, microphones everywhere. Non compliance
identified instantly.
Speaker 1: Total surveillance state, built on amnesia.
Speaker 3: And within just two generations, this new world order would
seem completely normal. The only life anyone's ever known. Children
would be created by DNA, genetically optimized for submissiveness, agreeability,
and lack of curiosity, incubated, educated, assigned roles from birth,
removing any spark of rebellion or independent thought, and chillingly,
the old and sick, they'd be euthanized, framed as a
humane act, no longer seen as a burden in this
hyper efficient, totally controlled society.
Speaker 1: Wow. Okay, so that's Project Bluebean, in all its detailed, intricate,
frankly terrifying glory. As surge of monist laid it out.
Now obviously a theory, this huge, It's attracted plenty of
credits plenty of skeptics. Some people dismiss Monest as you know,
a cook totally out there. Others practically revere him as
a prophet who saw all coming. But let's take a
breath and try to weigh the feasibility of these claims
based on the information we have. Consider what elements might
be pure fantasy and which may be hold a disturbing
echo of reality. Okay, first step one, earthquakes on demand.
Do we actually have the tech for that? The material
says emphatically, yes we do. They point straight to fracking
for oil citing. Oklahoma is the prime example where the
number of three point zero plus magnitude quakes went from
like two a year in the two thousands to over
eight hundred and twenty fifteen, directly in to frecking waste
water injection.
Speaker 3: So inducing seismic activity isn't science fiction, not at all.
Speaker 1: The technology exists. The obstacle, though, according to this, is
that you can't really do it secretly, not on the
scale needed for some devastating, game changing earthquake. It requires
huge crews of people in loud, heavy machinery equipment operations
just impossible to hide from the public eye. So while
the capability is arguably there. The secrecy needed for Project
Bluebeams specific plan maybe not feasible. According to these sources
I got. Moving to step two, global holograms gods UFOs
projected across the entire sky. The material claims this technology
capable of projecting realistic interactive three D images globally. It
doesn't exist, or at least nothing even close to it does.
But what about the argument.
Speaker 3: You know, the military is always twenty years ahead secret tech.
Speaker 1: Right, that's the common encounter perhaps, but the analysis here
are counters that such a system projecting images on that scale,
that complexity worldwide, it would need so much power, Like
the entire energy industry of the world would have to
be dedicated just to powering this one thing, all.
Speaker 3: Oil, gas, coal, nuclear, just for the light show. Imagine
the infrastructure needed. That kind of massive undertaking simply couldn't
be hidden. The energy demands alone would be monumental. Word
would absolutely get out. It would completely destroy the illusion
of a spontaneous, divine event. The sheer logistics the energy
needs they seem to debunk its covert feasibility.
Speaker 1: All right, then step three mind control using electromagnetic waves.
This technology the analysis converns does exist in certain forms,
but they clarify it's not really mind control on the
way you see in movies, implanting specific complex messages, creating
perfect sleeper.
Speaker 3: Agents, not like the Manchurian candidate.
Speaker 1: Right. However, the existing tech can apparently affect moods, can
cause anxiety and do sickness, and even chillingly kill people
through targeted energy pulses. The material references ongoing CIA work
in this area, adding that sarcastic note, you know that,
of course the CIA would never break the law pursuing
these capabilities, hinting at darker continued experiments.
Speaker 3: So the broad strokes of influencing human biology with em waves,
that's real, actively researched.
Speaker 1: Yeah, But the precise nuanced thought implanting capability described in
Bluebeam that seems, according to this to be either overstated
or just not realized yet on a global pervasive scale.
Speaker 3: And what's fascinating here is how the perspective then pivots
right away from the high tech feasibility of holograms or
direct mind control and towards the raw, undeniable power of
narrative of media manipulation. They suggest that faking an alien invasion,
that ultimate false flag event could be achieved much more
simply quote, all you need is a story and a
compliant media to push it.
Speaker 1: Wow. So maybe you don't even need the fancy holograms.
Speaker 3: Perhaps not if the narrative control is absolute. They mention
how that narrative is already being meticulously built. UFO sightings
framed as a national security threat, the potential existential threat
from space presented as already here. This narrative, they argue,
lays the emotional, the psychological groundwork. It primes the population
for a future manufactured crisis that might not even need
physical ships in the sky to be effective.
Speaker 1: So what does this all mean the idea of a
staged event, a false flag operation. It's not just theoretical,
is it. The material provides some chilling historical examples, real
world cases where governments allegedly use deception for political ends.
Think about Operation Gladio, Cold War era CIA and Mafia
supposedly teeming up arming Italian terrorists who then bombed civilians,
killed people, and the blame was pinned on Communists to
discredit them maintain political control.
Speaker 3: A horrific example if true.
Speaker 1: Or Operation Northwoods nineteen sixty two, a truly shocking documented
plan for the US Defense Department to stage terrorist attacks
on American scoil, blowing up US ships, sinking boats of
Cuban refugees, committing violence in US cities, and blaming it
all on Cuban terrorists as a pretext to invade Cuba. Fortunately,
President Kennedy reportedly said no apparently lost a lot of
trust in the military intelligence community after the Bay of Pigs.
Speaker 3: And then this protogal, It's staggering that was even proposed.
Speaker 1: And then there's the infamous Gulf of Tonkin incident sixty four.
US Navy falsely claims it's under attack by North Vietnam,
later revealed to be based on absolutely false, erroneous information,
and that drags the US into the Vietnam War. Fifty
thousand Americans dead, three hundred thousand wounded. And why the
material stakes bluntly to enrich weapons manufacturers in chemical companies,
illustrating how fabricated crises can serve huge financial geopolitical agendas.
Speaker 3: And this raises such an important question, doesn't it? If
governments powerful groups have historically used deceptions, stage events, propaganda
to start wars achieve political goals, often at immense human cost.
How does that shape how we should view current narratives,
especially the ones pushed hard by official channels by mainstream media.
It really compels you to view information with a necessary
degree of critical skepticism, doesn't It asking not just what
is being said, but why it's being said now and
who benefits from us believing it. This historical context really
underscores the chilling plausibility of using manufactured crises for control,
even if the specific steps of Project Bluebeam remain theoretical
or unproven.
Speaker 1: And speaking of official channels, let's talk about this recent
wave of UFO whistleblowers, the ones getting so much news coverage.
The material expresses significant skepticism about these individuals, stating pretty plainly,
everything they say is approved by the Pentagon. Now that
doesn't automatically mean what they say is false, but it
fundamentally means the Pentagon wanted them to say it at
this specific time in this specific way.
Speaker 3: A controlled narrative not necessarily genuine disclosure exactly.
Speaker 1: It's presented as a carefully managed opportunity for deception considered.
David Crush claims he heard about crash retrievals, but then
gets Pentagon approval to discuss it publicly, implying a carefully
managed release of information where what's not said might be
as important as what is. Or Louis Elasagnil, head of
It tip the Pentagon's UFO program, but then the Pentagon
later denied his role. His claims of resigning due to
lack of transparency often seemed to contrast with his carefully
worded statement about not being allowed to talk about something,
often pointing to his book for details that crucially were
cleared by official channels.
Speaker 3: The gatekeepers deciding what gets out.
Speaker 1: And even more unsettling, there's mention of the Farm, a
place near Culpepper, Virginia, where people were allegedly trained be
professional disinformation agents, taught how to lie, taught sophisticated psychological
techniques to gain trust and spread specific desired narratives within
communities like the UFO.
Speaker 3: Community, trained disinformation agents. That's a disturbing thought.
Speaker 1: So when you see people on mainstream media C and
n CBS sixty minutes discussing UFOs with such earnestness, the
claim here is that these individuals are cherry pick by
this cabal, this secret government group told what they're told
to say. The message they contend is meticulously scripted, delivered
to shape public perception towards a specific end. It raises
that uncomfortable possibility, doesn't it that what looks like genuine
disclosure could actually be a highly sophisticated form of managed
information designed to serve some unseen agenda.
Speaker 3: You know what's also fascinating here, beyond just checking the feasibility,
is this intriguing connection between a fictional concept and a
real world theory of deception. Serge Monist reportedly loves Star Trek.
He even referred to Project Bluebeams advanced tech as Star
Trek technology.
Speaker 1: Huh.
Speaker 3: Interesting detail And coincidentally, Gene Roddenberry, the creator of Star Trek,
had this unreleased movie plot called The God Thing. It
was later adapted into an episode of Star Trek the
Next Generation called Devil's Do And in that plot, an
alien uses advanced technology to pose as a god enslave
a planet and uses both mind control and holograms to
do it.
Speaker 1: Wow, the parallels are striking mind control holograms posing.
Speaker 3: As God exactly, And here's the kicker. Monist released his
Project Bleedbeam book roughly eighteen months after that specific episode aired.
The suggestion made is that maybe Project Bluebeam sounds like
science fiction because it probably was directly influenced by it
taking a fictional premise and sort of recasting it as
a real world conspiracy.
Speaker 1: That doesn't necessarily debunk the idea of deception by power structures.
Speaker 3: Not at all, but it does add this unexpected, almost
metal layer to the origin of some of the theory's
more fantastical elements. Makes you wonder how cultural stories get
recycled and represented.
Speaker 1: Okay, so, even if the specific tech blueprint of Project
blue Beam sounds like it came straight out of Star Trek,
the analysis is adamant that the desired world, the one
the elites supposedly want to create, is exactly how Project
Bluebeam describes. This vision they can tend is deeply linked
to the concept of globalism, which in this context means
a push towards centralized world governance, often spearheaded by specific
international organizations aiming for economic political integration on a global scale.
Speaker 3: Less national sovereignty, more international control.
Speaker 1: Right, and they claim you see this in emerging global economies, cultures, governments.
They specifically name drop powerful groups the Council on Foreign Relations,
the Builderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, and of course the WEF,
the World Economic Forum with its big annual meeting in Davos.
These are presented as key players orchestrating this move towards
the one world government manus described.
Speaker 3: And this raises a really important question about the well
the disingenuous nature perhaps of those advocating for these globalist visions.
Their alleged vision includes centrally planned government, single global currency,
controlled wages and prices, assigned jobs for everyone, no private property,
and even chillingly deep population to manage resources.
Speaker 1: They're pretty extreme ideas.
Speaker 3: Extremely and the material emphasizes that these extreme plans are
consistently downplayed or actively hidden through deception when presented to
the general public. What's particularly striking, and often pointed out
by critics is the apparent hypocrisy the rules proposed for
the masses electric cars only rely solely on public transport,
severely limit home energy use, adopt plant based diets, even
eat insects for protein. Those rules don't seem to apply
in practice to the elites themselves.
Speaker 1: Right They're flying at private jets, have multiple huge homes
kept at perfect temperature, eating steak and lobster at their
exclusive meetings.
Speaker 3: Exactly far removed from the austere life they propose for
everyone else. Now, the analysis suggests these elites don't actually
see themselves as hip rocrits. In their view, they need
more resources because they're more important than us. They can't
waste time in airport security or deal with flight delays
because they're too busy saving the world, so they believe
they have to be exempt from the rules they impose.
Speaker 1: It's less about evil, more about arrogance.
Speaker 3: Profound arrogance is how it's described, a deeply entrenched belief
in their own superior importance, their right to dictate others'
lives for what they see as the greater good.
Speaker 1: And this arrogance kind of manifests in concepts like that
infamous phrase You'll own nothing and you'll be happy right,
This idea popularized by the wef articulated by that Danish
politician i'da Acken back in twenty sixteen. It suggests this
future rental economy where the state owns all the resources
and individuals just subscribe to them least everything phones, fridges,
washing machines.
Speaker 3: Even your home, everything as a service, right and.
Speaker 1: It's typically presented as this progressive way to cut waste
in pollution, offering people more freedom and less responsibility because
you're not burdened by ownership maintenance stuff. Sounds appealing on
the surface, right, simpler, more sustainable life, But the analysis
here is pretty blunt about its true nature. It identifies
this as just another flavor of communism, just disguised as
this grand plan for sustainability and shared happiness. It implies
a system where the elites keep their private property, keep control,
while everyone else contributes their property for the greater good
under this illusion of happiness through state provision.
Speaker 3: And tellingly, the WF apparently backed away from the whole
own nothing and be happy slogan only after about called
up publicly generated huge criticism.
Speaker 1: Right, that retreat, highlighted in the material, is presented as
more deception, demonstrating their initial enthusiasm for such a system
was maybe revealed accidentally then quickly hidden again.
Speaker 3: You know what's truly fascinating here is how this connects
this overatching desire for radical societal transformation back to historical
revolutionary thought and how it might be subtly seated into
public consciousness to implement their vision of a new world.
The argument goes existing institutions, religion, family, patriotism, they need
to be completely dismantled. But because most people don't actually
want that kind of radical, top down change, the message
has to be delivered as subtle deception, even slipped into
pop culture through movies, music media.
Speaker 1: Making radical ideas seem normal, even desirable.
Speaker 3: Precisely, and this brings to mind Karl Marx's belief that
the old ways have to be torn down and the
only way to do it is by force. The material
cites his concept of revolutionary terror as the only way
to shorten the murderous death agonies of the old society
and the bloody birth throws of the new society. It's
about creating this pervasive narrative where the past is burdensome,
maybe even evil, where a radical break from tradition isn't
just desirable, but presented as urgent necessary for humanity's future.
This narrative of a necessary, perhaps even violent break from
the past, it's a persistent theme in revolutionary thought, and
the claim is it echoes in Bluebeams alleged a gen Okay.
Speaker 1: So what does this all mean? Where does this leave us?
Whether Project Bluebeam is a literal, actual blueprint for global control,
or maybe a cautionary tale born from a journalist's deep fears,
or some kind of blend of both. The material consistently
highlights one pervasive theme above all else, the powerful using
deception to take advantage of the powerless. And this deep
dive it really isn't about taking political science. It's about
trying to understand the fundamental mechanisms of control, the tactics
used to sway populations consolidate power.
Speaker 3: Because all systems are flawed.
Speaker 1: Ultimately they are, aren't they They're flawed because humans are flawed,
and humans design and run them. And when ideologus claim
their system is perfectly fair, perfectly equitable, perfectly just, they
are by definition lying. Whether it's communism, capitalism, socialism, free markets,
no truly fair system can exist as long as some
people will always try to take advantage, and some will
always want more power, more control. The core issue presented
here isn't the system itself, but the deception inherent to
human nature empowered dynamics.
Speaker 3: And this raises that important final question, what can we
as individuals actually do? How do we navigate this complex
landscape of subtle influence, overt manipulation. The advice given is
clear and actually quite empowering. Get your information from as
many sources as you can. Read widely, listen broadly. But
and this is crucial, don't stop there. Know they all
have an agenda and use subtle deceptions to manipulate you.
Every source, every outlet, every voice. Learn to recognize those
subtle cues, the hidden agendas, the manufacted narratives. For instance,
when you hear phrases like kill the past or unburdened
by what has been recognized. That's a core idea for Marx,
a foundational element of revolutionary thought. Focus on dismantling existing structures.
Even if the people promoting it don't openly admit its origins,
it represents a specific way of thinking and presenting it
without context, that's deception. The transformative power of developing this
awareness is profound. Once you learn to recognize all the
subtle ways the powerful use deception. Once you start seeing
the patterns, the underlying motivations, it's like the world goes
from black and white to color. A veil is lifted.
You will be changed forever by this new perception, and
perhaps most powerfully, you can't ever be deceived again in
the same way, because you'll have the tools to critically
evaluate whatever is presented to you. It's about discerning truth
from manipulation, not just in grand conspiracies, but in everyday information,
every day interaction.
Speaker 1: And when you learn this skill, that ability to see
through the layers to spot the manipulation, teach it. Teach
it to your kids, Teach it to everyone you can,
because that, the argument suggests, is the only way to
truly stop Project Bluebeing, or frankly, any other plan that
requires us the people to surrender our freedom to the powerful.
More regular people like you and me need to recognize
when we're being deceived and have the courage to just
say no, whether it's the media saying something doesn't feel right,
or politicians making promises that seem too good to be true,
or even as the wildest part of the theory suggests,
giant God projected into the sky telling you to abandon
everything you believe. It's about seeing the power structure, whatever
form it takes, for what it truly is an elaborate,
often painstakingly crafted illusion designed ultimately for control. Now, once
you see the illusion for what it is, oh, it
starts to lose its power over you,