Speaker 1: Or you grew born? All right, what? Sorry? Now I
Speaker 1: do have a premium account on Twitter, so why is
Speaker 1: it telling me I can't be on it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they'll often tell you things that aren't true.
Speaker 1: This is they just did something with it, like refreshed it,
Speaker 1: So I guess they're screwed that. Then I'll just remove
Speaker 1: that one. We're not on Twitter today and you can
Speaker 1: blame them. You can blame them because I already paid
Speaker 1: for it, so fuck that. Oh yeah, anyway, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: because they just said I need a premium account, which
Speaker 1: I have, So they just changed their rules again or something.
Speaker 1: So whatever, they're not getting any more money for me.
Speaker 2: We're doing pretty good for them having to move the
Speaker 2: goalposts all the time.
Speaker 1: I'll say, I'm wondering if they kicked me off because
Speaker 1: of some of the stuff I commented on last night.
Speaker 1: It could be maybe they talked toss me off.
Speaker 2: They wouldn't do that.
Speaker 1: Today is ten to twenty twenty four. It is eighth
Speaker 1: nine a m. Pacific time, and are here with Dwayne
Speaker 1: of bullet diegl of Bulletproof pub dot com. And uh,
Speaker 1: you guys haven't seen me since last Thursday because I've
Speaker 1: been working and I'm on my way to San Diego
Speaker 1: right after the show, so you're in hot sauce. Yeah,
Speaker 1: well I have to drink first and then right now.
Speaker 2: That's very commendable. I wish I was with you today.
Speaker 2: That would be a fun drive for me. That'd be great.
Speaker 2: What a what a conversation that.
Speaker 1: Would be ye, for sure. I get to catch up
Speaker 1: on podcasts and videos as I drive, keeps my sand right.
Speaker 2: Well, all shameless plug then, because you've got some time.
Speaker 3: Uhh, it happened again, No Diego, we lost you.
Speaker 1: You'll have to probably check out and check back in.
Speaker 1: We just got started rolling here and read around three
Speaker 1: minute mark. Usually that happens. Oh boy, huh. Let's see,
Speaker 1: let's see how long it takes. I'll just see if
Speaker 1: I can put him in the Yeah, there you go,
Speaker 1: There you go. I see you.
Speaker 2: Almost every time I go to speak on every podcast,
Speaker 2: whether it's on the Missing Link or with Andy Rouse.
Speaker 4: Or how is that with you?
Speaker 2: Every time I go to speak, my internet gets blown off.
Speaker 2: And then you'll see that it won't happen again the
Speaker 2: rest of this broadcast. At least the last five or
Speaker 2: six times, and I've done this that this has been
Speaker 2: the pattern.
Speaker 1: So it's usually righted on the three to four minute
Speaker 1: mark that it happens on our show.
Speaker 2: So yeah, sure we are. I'm booked unveil the further
Speaker 2: research on brand Eyes the Expert, and I was in
Speaker 2: the middle of talking about if you got time in
Speaker 2: the vehicle today to throw on part one of the
Speaker 2: Crisis of the Expert?
Speaker 1: Is that what you did on Sunday?
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, Sunday nights at nine eastern sixth Pacific. We
Speaker 2: get into you know, we're starting to push her.
Speaker 1: Okaye. Before it was like it's not.
Speaker 2: My internet is up, so I don't know.
Speaker 1: There you go, You're back.
Speaker 2: So we persevere, much like we are in the moment
Speaker 2: right now, to bring people the real history, real truth
Speaker 2: and how our society has become so governed by the
Speaker 2: scientific expert, or at least the opinion, and so that
Speaker 2: puts an entire nation, an entire world if we're going
Speaker 2: to just blindly listen to the expert into a logical fallacy,
Speaker 2: the argumentum ad octoritatum, or the appeal to authority without
Speaker 2: any evidence to support their claims. We can't just blindly
Speaker 2: listen to the expert because they're is a degree of
Speaker 2: vulnerability that must be considered when we do that. And
Speaker 2: in that degree of vulnerability where we don't really know
Speaker 2: when we're trusting, they can exploit us. And this is
Speaker 2: the story of the twentieth century of how they exploited
Speaker 2: us through this degree of vulnerability, right.
Speaker 1: And I think you had alluded in the email that
Speaker 1: this might tie into maybe Pastorian and vaccine fraud too,
Speaker 1: at least on the trail there, because I've been reading
Speaker 1: I've been reading by Shamp or Pasture.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Sure.
Speaker 1: And then also the third anatomical element blood in its
Speaker 1: third atomical elements what it's called by b. Shamp and
Speaker 1: man oh Man, it's very clear, it's very freaking clear
Speaker 1: what's been going on. And like you said, the manipulation
Speaker 1: of facts and manipulation statistics, manipulation of observations. Uh, and
Speaker 1: then you just accept it as because well, he's a
Speaker 1: scientist and he's a chemist and da da da da No,
Speaker 1: absolutely far and it's the one that's murdering people right now,
Speaker 1: that's to that level. It has been from the last
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty years.
Speaker 2: I mean, we don't have to look any further than
Speaker 2: Pfizer and what was going on during COVID was every
Speaker 2: commercial break and every segment of every news outlet was
Speaker 2: brought to you by Pfizer. We've seen those videos where
Speaker 2: it's just continually brought to you by Pfizer, brought to
Speaker 2: you by Pfizer, brought to you by Pfizer. Well, the
Speaker 2: CEO and chairman of Pfiser is only in a credited veterinarian.
Speaker 2: I think we've brought this point up before him and
Speaker 2: his team invented this chemical castration vaccine called Improvac to
Speaker 2: control pig populations through sterilizing of their gonatic tropen or
Speaker 2: goat their gonats. So now we're seeing today menstrual cycles
Speaker 2: of women and all kinds of other physical ambilts. I'm
Speaker 2: hearing the ambulance going up and down my road all
Speaker 2: day long. Now, when I was a kid, you might
Speaker 2: hear an ambulance once every few days. I'm hearing them
Speaker 2: in the middle of the night every night, and twice
Speaker 2: or three times during the day. And so this Albert
Speaker 2: Borla is really should his name should be synonymous with
Speaker 2: the experimentations of mangle because he uh and his family
Speaker 2: decided not to take those vaccines. Publicly has stated that
Speaker 2: he wouldn't well also advocating for everybody to take them.
Speaker 2: So this is a giant collection of.
Speaker 1: Our nice tacticus. I have yet to take mine. Thanks
Speaker 1: for reminding me, though, I have to do that. I've
Speaker 1: been using milk in the tingy tangerine, and man, is
Speaker 1: that it's like a cream circle. It's good, better than
Speaker 1: taking it straight with water, I think, personally, I still
Speaker 1: put the plant arrived into it. All Right, now you're back.
Speaker 2: My net went down again for the second time.
Speaker 1: Yep, freeze frame.
Speaker 2: It's just one after the other. But we're going to
Speaker 2: keep moving forward because we're going to be unaffected by
Speaker 2: all of this censorship and bullshit. Whatever it is. This
Speaker 2: may just be technical difficulties of our own. So I'm
Speaker 2: not even gonna say anything. We're just going to keep
Speaker 2: moving on. You are hearing me and seeing me presently, Yes, okay, good.
Speaker 2: So what I'm trying to connect here is the what's
Speaker 2: going on today in the pharmaceutical industry, normalized experimentation of
Speaker 2: the population in general, and where that comes from. You know,
Speaker 2: the first ever forced sterilization law that was put in
Speaker 2: and enacted was Brandizes. Through this Buck versus Bell, we
Speaker 2: talked about this last week.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, this is all eugenic stuff.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yes, And this is the origins of eugenics, and
Speaker 2: and it's Lewis d. Brandised, this same US Supreme Court justice,
Speaker 2: the first Jewish US Supreme Court justice. What made the
Speaker 2: connection for you and I was his frankest background and
Speaker 2: showing that he was an antinomial in that it was
Speaker 2: the rejection of all moral code and ethics from a
Speaker 2: US Supreme Court justice. So there's a giant contradiction right
Speaker 2: there that needs to be analyzed, researched, threshed out and
Speaker 2: looked at. Not to mention that he was the international
Speaker 2: leader of Zionism at the time, elected the chairman of
Speaker 2: the Provisional Executive Committee on General Zionis Affairs, which is
Speaker 2: Herzel's headquarters in Berlin, and so they had to move
Speaker 2: that out of Berlin and the lead up to the
Speaker 2: First World War much like a lot of these exiles
Speaker 2: were leaving Germany under the rises of Hitler. So yeah,
Speaker 2: that's the direction we want to go today, is people
Speaker 2: go ad.
Speaker 1: I was going to say, what people need to realize
Speaker 1: why this was allowed to happen is that even though
Speaker 1: they were establishing in a quote unquote Israel. Every place
Speaker 1: that has a central bank that's tied into the IMF,
Speaker 1: that signed into the Rothschild syndicate is another Israel. We
Speaker 1: are because we are controlled by the same people, not
Speaker 1: created by the same people, but co opted and infiltrated
Speaker 1: by the same Once that bank is established, there's no
Speaker 1: more sovereignty and there's no more government. It's just a
Speaker 1: bunch of people sitting around in Congress deciding how to
Speaker 1: kill us.
Speaker 2: Yes, and this is the important point to make. That's
Speaker 2: great of you to bring that up, because ultimately it's
Speaker 2: about social control, total authoritative control. And so what we're seeing,
Speaker 2: and then why we've got into this crisis of the
Speaker 2: Expert series is because we're seeing them actually putting that
Speaker 2: up as the sacrificial lamb. They're putting up Fauci and
Speaker 2: this idea of society being governed by the scientific expert
Speaker 2: up on a pedestal where they're going to actually tear
Speaker 2: it down, I think like they do with the statues
Speaker 2: of the Confederates and all of those things that are
Speaker 2: going on through radical progressive social reform.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, what they do is they'll they'll point everything
Speaker 1: on to one person, take him out and then it's like, oh,
Speaker 1: the system is now saved. It's reserved because we got
Speaker 1: rid of the bad guy. But in reality, it's the
Speaker 1: system that's the problem.
Speaker 2: And this is another great point by you, because we're
Speaker 2: going to go through this video and they do this
Speaker 2: exact thing to Oliver Wendell Holmes. Okay, they blame him
Speaker 2: for creating this this first sterilization law, but it's really
Speaker 2: Louis Brandey's Lewis Brandeis that's behind all of it. And
Speaker 2: to their credit, because we're going to go to a
Speaker 2: democracy now two part video clip where they actually go
Speaker 2: into this story, and to their credit, they do mention
Speaker 2: brand Eyes. His face is actually up there in the
Speaker 2: studio you'll see. And so they do go into this
Speaker 2: and they admit that Buck versus Bell, even for a
Speaker 2: law student to this Cohen C O H E. N.
Speaker 2: That's gonna he writes this book Imbeciles that we're gonna
Speaker 2: introduce you to, and he goes into this story and
Speaker 2: he said he even said through his lost education. There
Speaker 2: was one small little reference to Buck versus Bell. So
Speaker 2: obviously an underappreciated again segment of history. Again under the
Speaker 2: veil of progressivism, efficiency, the expanse, and the insatiable need
Speaker 2: for more technology the next greatest thing at the cost
Speaker 2: of human safety and health. This is really the progressivism
Speaker 2: we're talking about, this man made construct that we're led
Speaker 2: to believe that we're always progressing. This is the hamster wheel.
Speaker 5: Mm hm.
Speaker 2: This is why you always feel there's something bigger turning.
Speaker 1: Right in your archaic and de evolved. If you don't
Speaker 1: agree with what they're saying, you're just not able to understand.
Speaker 1: And that's the that's the trigger for the ego. If
Speaker 1: you don't agree with them, that's because you just don't
Speaker 1: understand the science.
Speaker 4: I was called a.
Speaker 2: Luddite and an old man several times already this morning,
Speaker 2: and we're not even at eight thirty Pacific times, So
Speaker 2: you know, I go in there and I start talking
Speaker 2: progressives and I ask them to define what liberalism is
Speaker 2: to them, and they are so confused. Is this is
Speaker 2: really the crux of the left right now. They can't
Speaker 2: even define themselves, which means they don't know who they are.
Speaker 2: And that is an incredibly dangerous place for you know,
Speaker 2: a great large segment of our portion, portion of our
Speaker 2: population to be when you think about that they don't
Speaker 2: know who they are because they can't even define themselves.
Speaker 1: Well, Dwayne, they're not a biologist, right right, and.
Speaker 2: They're not going to listen to a basement dwelling internet
Speaker 2: soldier like me over what a white coat stethoscope expert, right.
Speaker 2: And these are the things I'm trying to point out
Speaker 2: to them, and actually I am making headway because when
Speaker 2: you tell them that set you know, before you call
Speaker 2: me an anti semit I just want to remind you
Speaker 2: that there are seventy seven branches of Semitic speaking people,
Speaker 2: of which the largest population is the Arab And so
Speaker 2: then when I questioned them and ask them to challenge
Speaker 2: these things like the Federal Reserve is a separate entity
Speaker 2: from the federal government, they laugh at me and they say,
Speaker 2: you just made that shit up. Well, I show them
Speaker 2: a primary source where the Federal Reserve actually is declaring
Speaker 2: this and this is documented historical fact. I actually don't
Speaker 2: need to cite this. But for the progressives, I do
Speaker 2: you see?
Speaker 3: So?
Speaker 2: Uh yep, I think we'll start right there. If there's
Speaker 2: anything else you want to say about this, I mean,
Speaker 2: you've brought up some great points that are going to
Speaker 2: totally come back as we watch this here.
Speaker 1: You know, if we had some extra letters at the
Speaker 1: end of our name, or if we started dressing up
Speaker 1: in a funk scope, people would listen to us, even
Speaker 1: though we're not.
Speaker 2: Sure sure sure they would. We should actually do that experiment.
Speaker 2: I'd probably have to shave though my beard because you
Speaker 2: don't see many doctors with the wizard's sleeve like mine. Okay,
Speaker 2: So you should be seeing a democracy now, yep, okay,
Speaker 2: And so how do you want to do this? Do
Speaker 2: you want to just keep it rolling and fly right through?
Speaker 2: There are two so it's it's going to take about
Speaker 2: I think it's about twenty minutes total.
Speaker 1: Something is your thought process or miral? I say positive?
Speaker 2: Okay. And the reason I'm bringing this to everybody's attention
Speaker 2: is because the mainstream actually has approached some of this,
Speaker 2: but they don't tell you everything. So you'll see all
Speaker 2: of that in here.
Speaker 1: You just made a good point, and let me just
Speaker 1: put us up a little bit bigger when I this
Speaker 1: is that when they do address certain things, they do
Speaker 1: it to basically take hold of that story, and their
Speaker 1: omission is the way they control. So if they're going
Speaker 1: to tell you something about a topic, and they tell
Speaker 1: you ahead of time before you hear it from someone else,
Speaker 1: or if they say on their official highly promoted where
Speaker 1: every more people see them because they're you know, established
Speaker 1: in a trusted source, then you're not going to listen
Speaker 1: to anybody else who tells you the further details. So
Speaker 1: that's that's why we talk about in place. That's why
Speaker 1: Candice ow Owens is talking about frankism, right, And so.
Speaker 2: What they don't say is also a lie, right, what
Speaker 2: they omit, right, it is also a knowing lie. So
Speaker 2: here we go. We'll just start this and if you've
Speaker 2: got any comments, which I'm sure you will have several,
Speaker 2: we'll just stop it and thresh out the ideas. Here
Speaker 2: we go, tell me if the if the audio is
Speaker 2: an issue too, it should be fine.
Speaker 6: Now to look at what's been described as one of
Speaker 6: the worst Supreme Court rulings in history. In the nineteen
Speaker 6: twenty seven case Buck versus Bell, the Court upheld a
Speaker 6: statute that enabled the state of Virginia to sterilize so
Speaker 6: called mental defectives or imbeciles. The person in question was
Speaker 6: Carrie Back, a poor young woman then confined in the
Speaker 6: Virginia State Colony for epileptics and the feeble mind did,
Speaker 6: though she was neither epileptic nor mentally disabled. In the
Speaker 6: landmark decision, eight judges ruled that the State of Virginia
Speaker 6: had the right to sterilize her. Her mother, Emma, as
Speaker 6: well as Carrie's daughter Vivian, then only eight months old,
Speaker 6: were deemed similarly deficient. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Junior wrote
Speaker 6: the majority opinion, concluding, quote, three generations of imbeciles are enough.
Speaker 7: The decision resulted in sixty to seven case.
Speaker 2: So right away, they're blaming a Boston Brahman. And you know,
Speaker 2: I'm not here to advocate for the Boston Brahmins, but
Speaker 2: you can see over the last hundred years how the
Speaker 2: white Eastern establishment has been under attack by the new
Speaker 2: left in this white man supremacy that they claim. So
Speaker 2: you can see the first step they take is put
Speaker 2: a picture of Oliver Wendell Holmes up there and state
Speaker 2: that he was the dissenter.
Speaker 1: Right, because I mean, without the system allowing for that,
Speaker 1: it wouldn't have happened. It was condition of the system
Speaker 1: that allowed and Noliver window Holmes to do this exactly.
Speaker 2: So let's tear down the system would be the conclusion right.
Speaker 8: Yep, seventy thousand sterilizations of Americans considered unfit to reproduce.
Speaker 8: The Supreme Court decision had its origins in the eugenics
Speaker 8: movement then thriving in the United States. The nineteen twenty
Speaker 8: four Immigration Act was passed with similar inter.
Speaker 2: Okay, So William Howard Taft President. He's the only president
Speaker 2: I think that's ever been the chief Supreme Court justice.
Speaker 2: He's also the son of Alphonse Taft, the founder of
Speaker 2: Skull and Bones. And then over his right shoulder there's
Speaker 2: our little buddy, Lewis D. Brandeis. And to Taft's immediate
Speaker 2: left is Oliver Wendell Holmes. Okay, these two, this is
Speaker 2: these three here are kind of the nucleus of the
Speaker 2: House of Truth. This is where the house of truth
Speaker 2: progressive political slan comes from, in which they devise to
Speaker 2: flip the definition of liberalism. And we see today, as
Speaker 2: I've mentioned earlier, how liberals can't define themselves. They think
Speaker 2: they're classic liberals, but it's been flipped on them to
Speaker 2: be radical social reformers, and they don't really understand that.
Speaker 1: And I would just augment what you said about taking
Speaker 1: down the system, more like follow the system, because the
Speaker 1: system is the constitution, not what they've turned it into.
Speaker 1: They would love for you to destroy the system because
Speaker 1: that opens up the door for socialism and then communism.
Speaker 1: So we don't want to do that. We don't want
Speaker 1: to destroy ourselves because they are representing something in a
Speaker 1: false way. We want to make sure that we understand
Speaker 1: that we just have to take out the infiltrators, get
Speaker 1: rid of the parasite, and then re establish the system
Speaker 1: as it's supposed to be.
Speaker 8: Right ten to prevent immigration by genetically inferior groups, which
Speaker 8: included Italian Jews, Eastern Europeans, and countless others, in an
Speaker 8: attempt to improve the genetic quality of the American population.
Speaker 8: Author Adam Cohen writes about the case in his new
Speaker 8: book Imbeciles, The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization
Speaker 8: of Carrie Buck. Adam was previously a member of the
Speaker 8: New York Times editorial Board and a senior writer for
Speaker 8: Time Magazine. He's the co editor of the National Book
Speaker 8: Review dot com. Adam Cohen, Welcome back to democracy now.
Speaker 7: It's great to have you with us.
Speaker 1: Adam from the New York Times can.
Speaker 8: Tell you Harry Buck in a moment, we'll hear all
Speaker 8: about how it ties into exactly dark imglasses.
Speaker 2: Last name Cohen, and he's going to be the authority
Speaker 2: because he wrote the book Imbeciles, and we'll get in.
Speaker 2: I'm going to show you that book here in a minute.
Speaker 1: I'm working for the Marxist left rag.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and well we'll actually play this. I'm just going
Speaker 2: to grab his wikipage and just do a quick background check.
Speaker 2: But here we go.
Speaker 8: To immigration, eugenics, parallels to what we're seeing today, but
Speaker 8: start back in the nineteen twenties with Carrie Back.
Speaker 4: So she's a young woman who is growing up in Charlottesville, Virginia,
Speaker 4: being raised by a single mother. Back then, there was
Speaker 4: a belief that it was better off of.
Speaker 1: Did that use that positor? Did you use feed? Ah?
Speaker 1: I see, don't talk to me. I see how it is.
Speaker 1: I think it froze because he froze. That's my theory.
Speaker 1: Because this is a really dramatic pause.
Speaker 4: Do I sorry.
Speaker 1: We'll get him back for Virginia and what happened to
Speaker 1: her there.
Speaker 4: So she gets there just time. Virginia has just passed.
Speaker 1: It's a little choppy today the waters are a little choppy.
Speaker 1: Must be that acts that actor Moon in the Sky.
Speaker 4: For the first person will be eugenically And suddenly she's
Speaker 4: in the middle of a case that's headed to the
Speaker 4: US Supreme Court.
Speaker 6: And Adam Cole, could you explain what kind of medical
Speaker 6: tests were employed to determine that she was a so
Speaker 6: called imbecile?
Speaker 4: Yeah, terrible testing. These were very primitive IQ tests from
Speaker 4: the time that really didn't test intelligence at all. One
Speaker 4: question she was asked was what do you do when
Speaker 4: a playmate hits you? And whatever her answer was to
Speaker 4: that was somehow deemed to be relevant to whether or
Speaker 4: not she was an idiot, an imbecile, or a moron.
Speaker 7: That those were the categories.
Speaker 4: Yes, those were the three categories. And this was a
Speaker 4: formal hierarchy that was established by the psychological profession at
Speaker 4: the time and was actually in government pamphlets. So if
Speaker 4: you were of a mental age of two, called an idiot,
Speaker 4: if you were between three and seven, you were called anymbissile,
Speaker 4: and if you were eight and from between.
Speaker 1: A yes, So you're either an idiot, nimbecile, or moron.
Speaker 1: So that means that they're very predetermined and prejudge that
Speaker 1: you're one of the three. It's not that you can pass.
Speaker 1: You're either an idiotnimbessole, or a moron. There's no, there's
Speaker 1: no there's no fourth category that says, Okay, you've passed
Speaker 1: this test. You're not exactly a nimbecile or a moron.
Speaker 2: Yeah, your failure is inevitable.
Speaker 1: They pray, they predetermineder. She's like, well, she looks stupid,
Speaker 1: so let's castraighter. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So I just brought up Annam Cohen's wiki page
Speaker 2: and I'll just read it off here in New York Times,
Speaker 2: as was admitted there. But he worked in the administration
Speaker 2: of Bill Deblasio, new York mayor.
Speaker 1: Yeh, he've worked through de Blasio. Yeah, real name isn't
Speaker 1: even fucking Divasio.
Speaker 2: Yeah, okay. Graduated with a jd Degree in eighty seven
Speaker 2: from Harvard Law School, where he was the president of
Speaker 2: the Harvard Law Review. Who founded the Harvard Law Review,
Speaker 2: Lewis Brandeis. Do you think that he's really going to
Speaker 2: be here to defend Brandeis? No, he is here to
Speaker 2: actually hide him. This is the whole purpose of all
Speaker 2: of this, this whole interview. Democracy now setting all of
Speaker 2: this up is is to hide Brandeis's involvement. It's very
Speaker 2: clear to me just.
Speaker 1: The name of this show. Democracy now is no constitutional republic, right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's like mob rule now, no Philid, no filibuster.
Speaker 2: It's like this other video that I would like to
Speaker 2: get to at some point with you on Walter Littman,
Speaker 2: and it's a it's an interview of Ronald Steele, the
Speaker 2: Lipman biographer from in the nineties, and the guy that's
Speaker 2: interviewing him is from Brandeis University.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, if it wasn't controlled, it wouldn't be
Speaker 1: you know, mainstream television.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but this floats over everybody when he says, oh,
Speaker 2: Brandeis University, I studied under him at Brandeis. It doesn't
Speaker 2: it doesn't raise a red flag for people. I'm not
Speaker 2: actually the opposite.
Speaker 1: Right, I'm not an agent of the system. I swear
Speaker 1: to God.
Speaker 4: In twelve you were called a moron, and Carrie and
Speaker 4: her mother, who was also the colony, were deemed to
Speaker 4: be morons.
Speaker 9: And so explain what he feels again, happened to carry after.
Speaker 4: That lawyer who's actually not on her side. It's a
Speaker 4: former chairman of the colony for epileptics and feeble mind
Speaker 4: its own board of directors. He clearly wants to see
Speaker 4: her sterilized. He does a terrible job writing short briefs
Speaker 4: that don't cite the relevant cases. It goes up to
Speaker 4: the Supreme Court and the Court rules eight to one
Speaker 4: that yes, the Virginia law is constitutional, and yes Carrie,
Speaker 4: who there's nothing wrong with, should be sterilized.
Speaker 9: Will and who was responsible for appointing this lawyer to her,
Speaker 9: which is.
Speaker 4: The colony itself. So they chose one of their friends,
Speaker 4: and she truly had no advocate of any kind on
Speaker 4: her side. Back then, the American Civil Liberties Union, which
Speaker 4: has just had just started up, really was kind of
Speaker 4: pro eugenics, or at least some of the members around
Speaker 4: it were, And there were no advocations.
Speaker 1: And at least some of the members were as wells. Yeah,
Speaker 1: any members were regented. No, that is based on Darwinism,
Speaker 1: you Jack asked, right.
Speaker 2: And the ACLU, you know, brand Eyes, Frankfurt and all
Speaker 2: these guys have their fingers all over the founding of
Speaker 2: the ACLU and others other advocacy groups for the Jewish population.
Speaker 2: They're right there at the origins of all of it, but.
Speaker 8: This term eugenics was what the whole movement was and
Speaker 8: who is a part of it?
Speaker 7: Mana sure.
Speaker 4: So it started in England by it was the phrase.
Speaker 4: The word was coined by Francis Galton, who is a
Speaker 4: hagadson of Charles Darwin. So this was right after Darwin
Speaker 4: had discovered evolution and survival of the fittest. Galton and
Speaker 4: his followers said, well, if nature does this naturally, we
Speaker 4: can speed survival of the fittest along if we decide
Speaker 4: who gets to reproduce and who doesn't, if we get
Speaker 4: the fit people to reproduce, and we stop the unfit
Speaker 4: from repducing.
Speaker 2: Okay, so we see that upon the superstructure of evolution,
Speaker 2: the idea of human evolution that is still today a theory.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: We've seen throughout the twentieth century many attempts to fake
Speaker 2: this shit too. The piltdown man comes to mind immediately,
Speaker 2: and Lucy, yes, so he's he's just taking for granted
Speaker 2: that evolution is actually a thing. And so this is
Speaker 2: what your PhD hides from you as well.
Speaker 1: There's thing too. It's like the whole idea that it's
Speaker 1: it's not about the survival of the fittest, it's survival
Speaker 1: of the most clever. Yeah, it's the most adaptable.
Speaker 2: And really, at this point right we're showing that the
Speaker 2: most willing to go into the darkest places of our
Speaker 2: human mind are the ones winning. And so this is
Speaker 2: why our answers.
Speaker 1: Because the thing is a lot of people are not
Speaker 1: biologically made up to be this treacherous, so it doesn't
Speaker 1: occur to them. That's why we get blindsided a lot.
Speaker 1: Hopefully over this period of time, the last couple thousand years,
Speaker 1: I fucking figured out how they act.
Speaker 2: Yep, and we are in the middle of breaking this
Speaker 2: whole narrative. I'm seeing people wake up all over the
Speaker 2: place to you know, these false progressive narratives over one
Speaker 2: hundred years after they are imposed. But we are making
Speaker 2: steps for sure.
Speaker 4: That was the idea in England. It comes over to
Speaker 4: America and it's greatly.
Speaker 1: Stand by. You know, we need jeoparing music. Oh so,
Speaker 1: how's ever been doing this today? Son of a doctor?
Speaker 1: Peter Glidden's membership. It is the first of the month,
Speaker 1: second of the month, so I know you got it,
Speaker 1: make it happen. I've seen a couple of people come
Speaker 1: across out the first so I figured that's what they
Speaker 1: were waiting for. That's cool, good, good news. Because when
Speaker 1: I started breaking into the the information on bay Schamp
Speaker 1: and I start going over these books that I'm reading
Speaker 1: right now with you, you can understand just how important
Speaker 1: nutrition is to keeping your micros. I'm happy. Oh we
Speaker 1: lost them completely. He'll be back. He's probably just freshing.
Speaker 1: I'm too big on the screen, though, there you go.
Speaker 1: I'm sure he's He probably has to restart his computer
Speaker 1: or something like that, or restart, unplug his motive or something. Well,
Speaker 1: we'll be back. We'll be back. Like I said, In
Speaker 1: the meantime, let's just understand the importance of doctor Peterluden
Speaker 1: and doctor Monzo because it's all confirmed, and to understand
Speaker 1: it in its greatest detail, you want to go back
Speaker 1: to Beshop. You have to, because that's where the treachery
Speaker 1: began with Pasteur who took Jenner? Who is I wonder.
Speaker 1: I almost wonder if BRUCEI over there is related to him.
Speaker 1: I don't know if that's true or not, but you know,
Speaker 1: it's kind of general, as like the Grandpappy of the
Speaker 1: of the very horrible idea of shots and then bastardized
Speaker 1: by pastor by using serum because it was a mistake
Speaker 1: messing around with either I think was hens where a
Speaker 1: stale concoction was inject He was trying to inject them
Speaker 1: with poisons, and a stale concoction of a weaker degree
Speaker 1: apparently incurred. And this is a false out observation that
Speaker 1: when he then reinoculated them with the full serum of death,
Speaker 1: that they had some sort of resistance to it because
Speaker 1: they were given a lower dose before. And that's your foundation.
Speaker 1: One study base off a guy who was trying to
Speaker 1: sell you something, and that's where we get all of
Speaker 1: our vaccine information from. But yeah, there is there.
Speaker 2: You go, Hi, Hi, I'm sure where it stopped, but
Speaker 2: it's probably important when we're dealing with this stuff. Just
Speaker 2: if I go a minute without hearing you, I'm gonna
Speaker 2: just confirm with you. Okay, can you tell me where
Speaker 2: did you?
Speaker 1: So? When you freeze up, do you still see and
Speaker 1: hear me?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 2: No, no, I don't. I don't even know that I'm
Speaker 2: being frozen up because I'm looking at the screen that
Speaker 2: take like I don't see ourselves.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, I see.
Speaker 2: This is why I kind of caught on because I
Speaker 2: didn't hear you in the background making comments. I was like, Oh,
Speaker 2: I don't even know if we're on or not. So yeah,
Speaker 2: uh so where was I in this video? What was
Speaker 2: the last thing these guys said?
Speaker 1: You're making me I have shorter memory, bro problems.
Speaker 2: So we'll go back. Uh not there, This is the
Speaker 2: one we want here. But everybody just bear with us
Speaker 2: for a moment and we'll get her straight. This it's
Speaker 2: very important stuff, the origins of you know, forced inoculation
Speaker 2: homework assignment.
Speaker 1: For those of you in the audience, look up the
Speaker 1: word microzeima and then fish through the bullshit about it,
Speaker 1: because you're going to hear a bunch of adversarial comments
Speaker 1: ary on the topic. But it's because that is where
Speaker 1: the truth of life lies, right, Yeah.
Speaker 2: This is what we use in our potting soil. This
Speaker 2: is very important. This is what we're trying to promote
Speaker 2: in the soil, is a living soil so that we
Speaker 2: don't have to throw in a bunch of chemicals and
Speaker 2: horseshit and organic matter. I mean the organic matter and
Speaker 2: the horse shit's very good, but you do have to
Speaker 2: try to build an environment that becomes self sustainable.
Speaker 1: And what people don't understand is that within us, these
Speaker 1: granules of life, these microzi, are the things that cause
Speaker 1: change in our body, that cause disease based on the
Speaker 1: environment that they are in. So when you have toxins
Speaker 1: in your body, it changes them into something that can
Speaker 1: eat that toxin, and that can sometimes be detrimental to you.
Speaker 1: So you just have to neutrify yourself, get yourself wrong,
Speaker 1: and they will still be happily creating life rather than
Speaker 1: fermenting and breaking it down, which is they built, they
Speaker 1: give it and they take it away.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and it's really about anaerobic versus aerobic environments. If
Speaker 2: you are getting an error in oxygen, it's far better.
Speaker 1: Yes, and no, there's I mean I for a long
Speaker 1: time believe that too, that the anaerobic factory were bad.
Speaker 1: But there's that's that's going into the pastory and model.
Speaker 1: That's also a little bit of a deception. So they
Speaker 1: both they carry on both functions at the same time,
Speaker 1: and it all depends on what what the environment is
Speaker 1: and what the what the call of duty is at
Speaker 1: the time. That so it doesn't necessarily mean that the
Speaker 1: anaerobic is actually and it might not even be that
Speaker 1: it's anaerobic. It's just explained in that manner. So it's
Speaker 1: there's a lot of there's a lot whoa.
Speaker 2: Yeah, a little bit of a record scratch there.
Speaker 3: I heard.
Speaker 1: It's weird.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well that's very interesting and I'd like to know more.
Speaker 2: There as a market around it, right, I've always been
Speaker 2: thinking that, you know, the the environment is important, and
Speaker 2: and the and whether there's enough air for everything to
Speaker 2: breathe and not was a major reason as to the
Speaker 2: health of your crops.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean as a general rule, like fungal things
Speaker 1: grow and stuff like that during certain environments that aren't
Speaker 1: good in all. But yeah, there's just to just say that, uh,
Speaker 1: there's something that's that is anaerobic, and that it is
Speaker 1: somehow always going to be bad.
Speaker 4: Is not?
Speaker 2: Is not the too black and white thinking to binary Okay, yeah, okay,
Speaker 2: Well I appreciate that.
Speaker 1: It sets the opposition up to where it's now. Now
Speaker 1: we're in a war model again, and that's not how
Speaker 1: life works. It's symbiotic, right, life, life, life predate predates
Speaker 1: as in predator against life, not death upon life.
Speaker 2: Good point. Okay, So part one back to Buck versus Bell,
Speaker 2: I'm gonna back this up.
Speaker 1: Maybe oh like him?
Speaker 2: Maybe right, Okay, let's go in here somewhere start again
Speaker 2: with this guy.
Speaker 4: Was in part and explain sure, Margenzagger was the founder
Speaker 4: of Planned Parented. She formed a strategic.
Speaker 1: Alliance Okay, yeah, we didn't get this far yet.
Speaker 4: Support for her birth control movement. But she also believed
Speaker 4: some of this stuff, and she said some bad things
Speaker 4: at the time. This is a big controversy though, and
Speaker 4: on the right they use it to tain nothing idea
Speaker 4: of planned parenthood, which I think is unfair because Margenzager
Speaker 4: was actually in the mainstream of a lot of progressive
Speaker 4: thought at the time.
Speaker 2: Okay, so Margaret Sanger pep planned parenthood, but this is
Speaker 2: William Gates the Third's father is there at the origins
Speaker 2: of planned parenthood to Bill Gates's dad.
Speaker 1: Right, and Sanger, Oh my god, So he's just like
Speaker 1: an a positive way that he was also into progressive
Speaker 1: stuff out and there's nothing if it was positive And.
Speaker 2: There's nothing controversial about Margaret Sanger. There's a truth that's controversial, sure,
Speaker 2: but that you know, her actual history and her involvement
Speaker 2: all in all of this is not controversial at all.
Speaker 2: It's as controversial as Margaret Meade and Gregory Bateson's involvement.
Speaker 1: This might be a good time to point out that
Speaker 1: I don't have ad blocker for YouTube right own, and
Speaker 1: every I'm getting I'm getting tired of this and I'm
Speaker 1: about to kick a midget if I have to see
Speaker 1: another one of these fucking things. But it's it's Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris say campaigning on the fact that she's protecting the
Speaker 1: rights of baby murder, because I can't go along without that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And her whole platform, I think right now is
Speaker 2: called We're not going.
Speaker 1: Back because that's a right, that's a right to murder babies.
Speaker 1: And on the Milochean sacrifice, molocer is on the thing.
Speaker 1: It was a type of sacrifice, and we're not going back.
Speaker 2: About a progressive of a presidential platform slogan as I've heard, right.
Speaker 8: As is evidenced by the Supreme Court decision. Now, explain
Speaker 8: who was on the Supreme Court who wrote the decision,
Speaker 8: what these justices believed themselves.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so this was actually a very fancy court at
Speaker 4: the time. The Chief Justice was William Howard Taft, who
Speaker 4: had been President of the United States before he became
Speaker 4: Chief Justice, the only president to do that. He'd also
Speaker 4: been a professor at Yale Law School, Lewis Brandeis, who was.
Speaker 2: Known as the Everybody.
Speaker 4: He joined the Court, a great progression he was on
Speaker 4: the Court. And then, of course Oliver Wendell Holmes, probably
Speaker 4: the most revered justice in American history. He was a
Speaker 4: legendary figure. There have been there's a movie about him.
Speaker 4: There was a play on Broadway cover of Time magazine.
Speaker 4: He was thought to be the wise because he's era
Speaker 4: and he wrote this terrible decision.
Speaker 2: Well, I want to go to something that yes, And
Speaker 2: they promoted him through flattery and vanity.
Speaker 1: That's why Hamilton on Broadway and all that shit. They
Speaker 1: are the scoundrels. They are the criminals.
Speaker 2: Yep, even today with you know the movie with Snowden
Speaker 2: and Glenn Greenwall that wins an Oscar Award.
Speaker 9: I mean, come on, he said in the decision.
Speaker 6: This is Oliver Wendell Holmes Junior, who wrote in the
Speaker 6: majority opinion for the Court, the nation must sterilize those
Speaker 6: who quote sap the strength of the state to prevent
Speaker 6: our being swamped with incompetence.
Speaker 9: He declared, quote it's better for all the world if.
Speaker 6: Instead of waiting for to execute degenerate offspring for crime
Speaker 6: or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can
Speaker 6: prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind.
Speaker 1: So right there, okay, So if you want to get
Speaker 1: rid of the criminal element, then they should get rid
Speaker 1: of themselves. There should be no dual citizens at this point.
Speaker 1: There should be no It's kind of like a hot dog.
Speaker 1: Shouldn't be any heybenationals, right, but hey, you know whatever,
Speaker 1: put them in government because they're definitely not, you know,
Speaker 1: biased to their own agenda. That's okay, But also the
Speaker 1: ideality of the if how weak is your system, if
Speaker 1: somebody who doesn't have the faculties at tiler Shoes is
Speaker 1: going to destroy it on you?
Speaker 2: Yeah, and who's there to make these decisions and to
Speaker 2: determine who's degenerate and who isn't, because we shouldn't leave
Speaker 2: it to the progressives. We were seeing that they made
Speaker 2: a giant mistake.
Speaker 1: And let's just also mention that taft and they mentioned Yale,
Speaker 1: so obviously skull and bones, mate, Yeah, I do that
Speaker 1: there too, Yes?
Speaker 2: And I was that recorded or not? When I told
Speaker 2: when we froze it on the US Supreme Court picture
Speaker 2: with Oliver Windeholmes. Brandeis and yeah, yeah, we did. Okay, good, Yeah.
Speaker 6: No, So I wanted to ask you about the fact
Speaker 6: that you studied at Harvard Law School and at the time,
Speaker 6: this justice was considered a hero of the American legal system.
Speaker 6: So could you explain who he was, what kinds of
Speaker 6: positions he took, and how he was still revered.
Speaker 4: Sure he was a heroic figure. He'd actually been a
Speaker 4: professor at Harvard Law School before he joined the US
Speaker 4: Supreme Court. And even when I was at Harvard Law.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he was there for less than a year. And
Speaker 2: guess who paid for his wages? Brandice Law School.
Speaker 4: There were portraits of him everywhere. He's still a very
Speaker 4: revere justice. But he came out of a certain tradition.
Speaker 4: He was a so called Boston Brahman. He was from
Speaker 4: some of the fanciest families in Boston. The Oliver's, the Wendells,
Speaker 4: and the Holmes were all Old New England families. He
Speaker 4: was raised by a father, Oliver Wendelholmes Senior, who had
Speaker 4: been the dean of Harvard Medical School. Alva Wendelholm Senior
Speaker 4: actually coined this phrase Boston Brahmen, and the idea was
Speaker 4: that these fancy families in Boston were like the Brahmins
Speaker 4: in India, that they were the highest cast. So he
Speaker 4: believed this. He wrote about eugenics even before this case
Speaker 4: came along, wrote about it favorably. So when the case
Speaker 4: gets to him, he believes that people like carry Buck,
Speaker 4: poor white, uneducated people, are much lesser than him. So
Speaker 4: it's very natural for him to say, of course, we
Speaker 4: don't need more people like carry Buck, we need more
Speaker 4: people like me and my Boston Brahmin neighbors. So that
Speaker 4: was the philosophy, and it is amazing that to this
Speaker 4: day he still revered it.
Speaker 1: Yes, Okay, so I'm not sure what the what the
Speaker 1: ethnicity of mister Holmes is, because every name can be
Speaker 1: a can be a cover for something else. But I
Speaker 1: will say this, if they're going to bring up in
Speaker 1: this valley, if they're going to bring up the gangetic
Speaker 1: in this valley and all this other stuff, thingly, they're
Speaker 1: basically pointing out Aryan culture. And if they're going to
Speaker 1: say that because they are feel superior, well that this
Speaker 1: level of how they apply that is completely semitized. That
Speaker 1: has nothing to do with the traditional you know, the
Speaker 1: creators and cultivators of civilization that the Scythian Arians were,
Speaker 1: or propaganda throughout the world. It has this this this
Speaker 1: type of attitude toward it is the wrong way. This
Speaker 1: is a corruption of that right.
Speaker 2: And so what is the Boston Brahmins? But wasps white
Speaker 2: Anglo Saxon Protestants. So all of that is under attack
Speaker 2: by these guys. So I'm just gonna pause here for
Speaker 2: a second. See if I can show you this picture,
Speaker 2: because a picture is worth a thousand words of Brand
Speaker 2: Eyes and Oliver window Holmes.
Speaker 1: If I can it flickered for a second. I looked
Speaker 1: like maybe I yeah, I think I did. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Maybe not.
Speaker 2: Oh the picture of uh, Brand Eyes and Window Holmes.
Speaker 1: I don't know if it did or not. I saw
Speaker 1: something flickered, but it's not giving it to me.
Speaker 2: So we're just gonna move on. I'll see if I
Speaker 2: can do this at a better time. But we'll finish
Speaker 2: this video and maybe I can show this picture. So
Speaker 2: back to share screen.
Speaker 1: Oh, if you are you trying to do something from
Speaker 1: right off your computer?
Speaker 2: Is that from a window like I've just brought up
Speaker 2: a picture.
Speaker 1: All right, share a screen and then entire screen.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I tried there.
Speaker 1: So when you hit the entire screen, you have to
Speaker 1: also click the box that says entire screen left, yeah,
Speaker 1: and then his share and then after you do that
Speaker 1: you bring it there you go, and then you just
Speaker 1: bring it over to where you Now, what do I do?
Speaker 1: Click the tab that you want?
Speaker 2: Click what tab?
Speaker 1: Well, you're on this screen. You're looking at me and
Speaker 1: right now, so you just go find the picture and
Speaker 1: pull it up on your screen and anything that's on
Speaker 1: your screen.
Speaker 2: Okay, let me see.
Speaker 1: There you go?
Speaker 2: That works? Holy shit. Okay, I've just learned something today,
Speaker 2: m that that will make it a little bit more smooth.
Speaker 2: So here is a picture that says a thousand words.
Speaker 2: Right there's all Louis Brandi is holding the arm of
Speaker 2: Oliver Wendell Holmes in his later years.
Speaker 1: A frankist with a quote quote right, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean? Like, so look at look at the corruption
Speaker 1: right there. I mean, he's totally If he was so
Speaker 1: proud of his blah blah blah heritage and YadA YadA,
Speaker 1: he wouldn't be The two of these people would be
Speaker 1: at complete odds unless there was a corruption.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And then maybe while I'm here, we'll just show you
Speaker 2: another very interesting picture. You see, uh or are you
Speaker 2: very young? FDR there?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Okay, so that's FDR and Walter Littman sitting together. This
Speaker 2: will be circa nineteen sixteen seventeen. So you can see how,
Speaker 2: you know, Walt Walter Littman ends up being in FDR's
Speaker 2: cabinet administration, this brain trust some thirty years after this,
Speaker 2: so you can see why FDR actually ended up being
Speaker 2: a president for three or four terms or whatever he was.
Speaker 1: And fucking Bilmer if you want to talk about it,
Speaker 1: just look at that fucking bleak.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And then so in the background I want to draw
Speaker 2: everybody's attention to is the Central European the new map
Speaker 2: that's created by the Inquiry, of which Walter Littman is
Speaker 2: the first founding lifetime member of. They actually gather all
Speaker 2: of America's greatest cartographers map makers and start to redraw
Speaker 2: this map. And I have the official primary source as
Speaker 2: close as possible, with all of the little signatures in
Speaker 2: the in the borders and up here in the upper left.
Speaker 2: It's a gift from the Inquiry to the American Geographical Society.
Speaker 2: So this map is key, and it's just showing that
Speaker 2: they are using this map in the room that they are,
Speaker 2: you know, devising their their war attack. And here I
Speaker 2: mean this is a very important photo. Very few have
Speaker 2: seen this, but hugely important. Understand that Littman and FDR
Speaker 2: were friends pre dating Woodrow Wilson's presidential presidential campaign. There, Okay,
Speaker 2: this is why they all end up being part of
Speaker 2: the brain trust. Frankfurter brandeised Litman. They're surrounding Woodrow Wilson
Speaker 2: in creating the Fourteen Points, and then they move all
Speaker 2: of that towards the New Deal and the creation of
Speaker 2: the UN, which is a direct continuity from the inquiries
Speaker 2: creation of the League of Nations. Walter Littman writes, the
Speaker 2: Fourteen Points that become the League of Nations, that become
Speaker 2: the UN. There's at least seven or eight guys that
Speaker 2: are there in the creation of the Leaga Nations that
Speaker 2: are there in nineteen forty five at Dumferton, Oaks and
Speaker 2: San Francisco signing in the League of Nations. So nobody
Speaker 2: can give me any shit that those aren't connected. There
Speaker 2: is an ominous continuity, and it's provable repeatable sympirical. It's
Speaker 2: documented history. I don't need even to cite it, but
Speaker 2: I do for the plain reason that a large, you know,
Speaker 2: segment of our population is completely unaware.
Speaker 1: So Thrasher put up two down one on the way
Speaker 1: with the three world wars, I would argue that we've
Speaker 1: been in a consistent war that might be considered the
Speaker 1: first and the third since the since the end of
Speaker 1: the Civil War.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, since the Cold War, because Walter Littman.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm maybe not a world but I mean
Speaker 1: as far as a major attack on us.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, well the Cold War. That term is coined
Speaker 2: by Walter Littman, Bernard Baruch two Phi beta Kappa, close
Speaker 2: personal friends, progressives certainly, certainly Bernard Baruch are the.
Speaker 1: Ones that put together the Bolsheviks in the first place.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and so yeah, this is the circles. This is
Speaker 2: all of a sudden we see Jacob Schiff and the
Speaker 2: war birds all in the same circle. We've shown this
Speaker 2: through the brandeis part three, uh, the creation of Israel,
Speaker 2: that they're all in cahoots together.
Speaker 1: So yeah, so when you when you pull up the
Speaker 1: next one, if you're going to try to do it
Speaker 1: with the other Schoen, you just have to slide the
Speaker 1: barrow for share audio, but then you'll only be able
Speaker 1: to see your screen. But anyway, okay, you do it
Speaker 1: the other way that you had it before. Yeah, you're not.
Speaker 1: You're going to see this disappear for a second, like
Speaker 1: you'll just see my little icon. But I'm still there, all.
Speaker 2: Right, Okay, I'm going in and out like I'm using
Speaker 2: zoom too, so it's a little bit different. Yeah, on
Speaker 2: the Andy rowse deep share, I'm using zoom. But no excuses.
Speaker 4: These were some pretty repugnant views. But one reason that
Speaker 4: can still be the case is that this case has
Speaker 4: not talked about. When I took constitutional law at Harvard
Speaker 4: Law School, it was not taught. The leading American constitutional
Speaker 4: law treatise, seventeen hundred pages that goes into great detail
Speaker 4: about many many cases, has half a sentence about Buck
Speaker 4: feed Bell. They're just sort of forgotten about it and
Speaker 4: made it not part of Holmes's legacy.
Speaker 8: Don't remember how the Nazis fit into this picture, Adam Calling.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so one of the shocking the Nazis actually followed us.
Speaker 4: We were the leaders in the eugenic sterilization Indiana passed
Speaker 4: eugenic station law in nineteen oh seven, well before the
Speaker 4: rise of the Nazi Party. They were looking to America
Speaker 4: and one of the villains in my books Channels a
Speaker 4: man named Harry Laughlin who runs the ran the Eugenics
Speaker 4: Record Office on Long Island, and he was in correspondence
Speaker 4: with the Nazi scientists throughout this whole period. They were
Speaker 4: looking to him for advice about how to set up
Speaker 4: a eugenic sterilization program. He wrote with pride in his
Speaker 4: Eugenics magazine that they based the Nazi eugenic law on
Speaker 4: his American law.
Speaker 7: Well you go like, p We're not talking about okay.
Speaker 2: And it's even worse than that because the Nazis borrowed
Speaker 2: all of their propaganda from Edward Burne's propaganda. The book
Speaker 2: written in nineteen twenty eight. And you know, Bernez even
Speaker 2: admits that am I off the Internet now again? Like
Speaker 2: aid dad. Let's see shows my Internet up check check one? Two?
Speaker 2: Am I up? And Daniel gone. These are the adventures
Speaker 2: of a forensic historian getting closer and closer to the
Speaker 2: truth every day. People. This is what we put up with.
Speaker 2: I put up with this in my real life. Can
Speaker 2: somebody somehow let me know whether we are on or not.
Speaker 2: I feel like I'm still on. Yeah, we got Daniel,
Speaker 2: but it shows that my internet's actually fine.
Speaker 1: I had to stand up for a second too. Yeah,
Speaker 1: just lighting. Something just kicked out. I was trying to
Speaker 1: fix it, but I didn't want to help people get
Speaker 1: up a let the seizures because I was tapping a
Speaker 1: light on and off.
Speaker 2: So we've been live this whole time. It was just
Speaker 2: you that jumped out, where's my background?
Speaker 1: Jesus Christ.
Speaker 2: Everything, It's okay because we strive to continue through all
Speaker 2: of this bullshit and try to still in a linear,
Speaker 2: concise fashion transform, transfer, transport all this information that we
Speaker 2: have into the viewer listener, and for everybody that's still there,
Speaker 2: I appreciate your patience with all this BS.
Speaker 1: It's just not let me have it.
Speaker 2: That's what your background.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it just yeah, screw you, I said, Okay, Well.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna keep going. Yeah, we are recording and people
Speaker 2: are listening and watching, are they? Oh yeah, I see
Speaker 2: live fifty minutes. So we're gonna go back to part
Speaker 2: one because we're just about at the end of it.
Speaker 2: I'll go back about ten seconds or so I.
Speaker 1: Didn't realize that you had dropped out. I was standing
Speaker 1: up trying to fix the light.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's probably some weird And just as a reminder
Speaker 2: our work on the exhilitarat in La and Thomas Mann
Speaker 2: and his book Faust, his book on you know, uh,
Speaker 2: Mephistopheles and making a deal with the Devil. The devil
Speaker 2: in his book looks very much just like this guy,
Speaker 2: dark rimmed glasses. The only thing he's missing is a
Speaker 2: bow tie.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 2: So Man even identified the scientific technical expert as being
Speaker 2: the devil in his depiction of posts about.
Speaker 4: This whole period. They were looking to him for advice
Speaker 4: about how to set up a eugenic sterilization program. He
Speaker 4: wrote with pride in his Eugenics magazine that they based
Speaker 4: the Nazi eugenic law on his American law.
Speaker 1: Well, that's really what happened in Germany, though, which in
Speaker 1: reality is part of another narrative that's not true.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and so I said it not the way that
Speaker 2: they go to the extreme right. And I stated here
Speaker 2: just before I realized we were bounced off again, was
Speaker 2: that not only were this American eugenics movement an inspiration
Speaker 2: to the Nazis, but Also, the Nazis took from us
Speaker 2: the art of propaganda in that Edward Burnees wrote the
Speaker 2: book Propaganda in nineteen twenty eight, and he was considered,
Speaker 2: you know, the father of public relations long before that.
Speaker 2: And it's admitted even Burnet's states that, you know, the
Speaker 2: Nazis were using his methods of propaganda to infiltrate and
Speaker 2: to brainwash the German people. So when you see people
Speaker 2: with the memes saying talking about nineteen thirties and how
Speaker 2: they all didn't know, well, this is how, and this
Speaker 2: is why the new Left and these progressives today still
Speaker 2: don't understand, because it's the same propaganda being used on them,
Speaker 2: you know, years later, nearly now, are you still there?
Speaker 1: I am here, sweet, sweet, something about.
Speaker 4: Sorry.
Speaker 1: Some people said they couldn't hear me, but then they
Speaker 1: said I was back. There's all kinds of things going
Speaker 1: on today, Bud.
Speaker 2: Whoa, And we're agile and able to maneuver. So the
Speaker 2: last minute here, we'll get through right quick.
Speaker 8: Americans looking to the Nazis, who supported the Nazis.
Speaker 7: We're talking about the Nazi American press, yep.
Speaker 4: Absolutely and shocking also the degree which there was friendship
Speaker 4: and cooperation between the American eugenesis and important scientists in
Speaker 4: America and the Nazis. So Harry Laughlin, this villain of
Speaker 4: the book, he actually is given a honorary degree from
Speaker 4: the University of Heidelberg in nineteen thirty six. That's a
Speaker 4: year after they purged all the Jews from the faculty.
Speaker 4: He was fine with that because he was actually a
Speaker 4: Nazi sympathizer.
Speaker 8: Let's go to a break, and when we come back,
Speaker 8: we're going to continue on this to discussion the US modeling.
Speaker 1: What nice started bombing all of German and cities. Know
Speaker 1: where you know where the Jews are most safe at
Speaker 1: the fucking camps.
Speaker 2: Right, sure, yeah, they sure certainly weren't safe in Dresden. No, yeah,
Speaker 2: good point, good point. So let's see if I can
Speaker 2: do this. Now, we'll just switch over to part two
Speaker 2: and just keep flowing, still giving you any issue and
Speaker 2: on the background, eh, crazy.
Speaker 1: Since my screen apparently has to be visible.
Speaker 2: Now, okay, so here we go. We'll just keep rolling
Speaker 2: into part two. So they obviously had a commercial break
Speaker 2: and came back.
Speaker 7: Immy Goodman with the mean shaf Our guest is Adam Cohen.
Speaker 8: Author of the new book imbeciles, the Supreme Court, American eugenics,
Speaker 8: and theization of Kerry What I mean?
Speaker 9: So I wanted to turn to a clip.
Speaker 6: Well, there was a Queen picture of judgment at Nuremberg
Speaker 6: which references the nineteen twenty seven case Buck versus Bell.
Speaker 6: This clip begins with Maximilian Shell playing German defense.
Speaker 9: Attorney Marlene Dietrich.
Speaker 6: Then we hear from John Vendra helped to Karl Vieck,
Speaker 6: former minister.
Speaker 2: Okay, something I want to point out. Here's Marlene Dietrich.
Speaker 2: He's in there. She's like the queen of film noir,
Speaker 2: dating after its origins at the Wymar, she comes to America.
Speaker 1: Oh all right, right right.
Speaker 2: Befriends a bunch of these famous starlet's, Hollywood.
Speaker 1: Starlet's when Berlin was at its scummiest, is what you're saying?
Speaker 2: Yeah, and what is this image but film noir using shadow? Right,
Speaker 2: this is when you look at the key aspects of
Speaker 2: film noir. That's what this movie apparently was. And I
Speaker 2: don't know what this face is here that looks like brandeis,
Speaker 2: but I swear it could also be Lincoln. Yeah, right,
Speaker 2: Like her profiles are nearly identical or replicated Jr. Or
Speaker 2: Robert Kennedy Junior. That's interesting.
Speaker 9: Of justice in Weimar, Germany.
Speaker 2: And actually, before we get going here too, something you
Speaker 2: want to say about Nuremberg is that they identified a
Speaker 2: lot of those like the lampshades made of human skin,
Speaker 2: the soap made of humans. They that was all discredited
Speaker 2: during the Nuremberg Trials. Yet here we are in the
Speaker 2: year twenty twenty four people still believe this shit, including
Speaker 2: this Cohen character.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and their testimonies where we didn't know that this
Speaker 1: was happening. Well, I don't know why they didn't know
Speaker 1: what was happening, because it wasn't That's why exactly it
Speaker 1: was happening exactly hung was it the same amount of
Speaker 1: people that they hung in the Book of Vester during
Speaker 1: the Nuremberg Trials, So it was like eleven or twelve
Speaker 1: or ten or something like that, and they were innocent people,
Speaker 1: just like just like the perium. And it was during
Speaker 1: the Perium that they had these hangings. Isn't that funny?
Speaker 1: Not ritualistic at all, Absolutely not stomachs.
Speaker 10: I prevent their propagation by medical means in the first place.
Speaker 10: Three generations of Imbassies are a you're recognized now, doctor Beek, No, sir,
Speaker 10: I don't. Actually, there's no particular reason you should. Since
Speaker 10: the opinion appostes theization law in the state of Virginia
Speaker 10: of the United States and was written and delivered by
Speaker 10: that great American tourist Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendel wom Right.
Speaker 2: And so certainly at the Nuremberg Trials, they're not going
Speaker 2: to start pointing the finger at the first Jewish US
Speaker 2: Supreme Court justice. That would eliminate any sympathy that they
Speaker 2: might have. And so he know in this movie how
Speaker 2: they do it nice and slow, Oliver Wendell Holmes. So
Speaker 2: they're obviously trying to underline all of this and put
Speaker 2: it in the lap of a Boston Brahm and an Anglo,
Speaker 2: a white Anglo Saxon Protestant.
Speaker 1: I think it's funny that his name, Alver Wendell Holmes,
Speaker 1: is the conglomeration of three major families that they named
Speaker 1: him after.
Speaker 2: Very important to understand that was a clip And actually,
Speaker 2: just like Brandeis, it's the Whales, the Brandeises, and the
Speaker 2: Deembits that get together and send Louis father on a
Speaker 2: reconnaissance mission to the Midwest to open up that area
Speaker 2: and look for opportunities. And this is the milieu that
Speaker 2: Lewis Brandeis is born into, the.
Speaker 1: Oregon Trail Rothschild style.
Speaker 6: Right from the film Judgment at Nuremberg, So Adam Cohen,
Speaker 6: in this film they actually cite Supreme Court Justice Oliver
Speaker 6: Wendell Holmes.
Speaker 1: So they're using a movie to the actual number history.
Speaker 1: They go to a movie to identify fact, and you
Speaker 1: know when then and then reference it right?
Speaker 2: And then when I was a kid, my mom, would
Speaker 2: you always tell me this is only a movie. This
Speaker 2: is only a movie. We've never considered movies to be
Speaker 2: a historical reference. Yet this is largely what the newer
Speaker 2: generations will do. They'll point to movies like Shindler's List
Speaker 2: as a true depiction or Saving Private Ryan as a
Speaker 2: true depiction of World War two activities. And it's just
Speaker 2: it's established. You want to talk about a history being
Speaker 2: told by the victors or just a collection of lies, Well,
Speaker 2: this is how it's done.
Speaker 1: Well the mind actually thinks that it's experiencing it too,
Speaker 1: so now it's now it's a part of them.
Speaker 4: So how.
Speaker 2: And you're getting now into John Baudriard's simulation, simulacra, and
Speaker 2: this is why they create movies about it, because if
Speaker 2: they if you've watched this movie, your brain and your
Speaker 2: subconscious takes it as if you have experienced it. So
Speaker 2: these are the things that's sticking your brain. And this
Speaker 2: is what they spent billions on trying to figure out.
Speaker 2: Even before motion picture was around.
Speaker 4: Two. We put the leading Nazis on trial for some
Speaker 4: of the worst things that the Nazis did. One of
Speaker 4: those very bad things was they set up a eugenics
Speaker 4: program where they sterilized as many as three hundred and
Speaker 4: seventy five thousand people. So we put them on trial
Speaker 4: for that, and Lo and behold, as.
Speaker 2: The movie, that's a conservative number for sure, since.
Speaker 4: Was how can you put us on trial for that?
Speaker 4: Your own US Supreme Court said that sterilization was constitutional,
Speaker 4: was good. And it was your own Oliver Wendell Holmes,
Speaker 4: one of your most revered figures, who said that. So
Speaker 4: why are we the bad guys in the story? They
Speaker 4: had a point?
Speaker 9: So can you explain what argument?
Speaker 1: Because that's something that is even a fact, right, it's
Speaker 1: still part of the narrative against the German.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a non sequitor for sure.
Speaker 9: In the US.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so it came over in the early tens and
Speaker 4: twenties of nineteen tens and nineteen twenties, This was actually
Speaker 4: a very nervous time. You know, you see movies now
Speaker 4: about the nineteen twenties. You see flappers and prohibition and parties.
Speaker 4: But America was actually at a time of quiet turmoil.
Speaker 4: There were the highest rates of immigration that there had
Speaker 4: been in American history, so that the cities were flooded
Speaker 4: with new immigrants, often with different religions, different nationalities from
Speaker 4: the people who are already hear. Also, people were leaving
Speaker 4: the Taraja into the cities, So it was a time yeah,
Speaker 4: stability and historians.
Speaker 2: He's trying to tell you that, you know, the forty
Speaker 2: eight ers and the immigrants of the eighteen hundreds had
Speaker 2: disparate religions and values and beliefs. Yet they all spoke
Speaker 2: English generally, they all had the same religion, Christianity, and
Speaker 2: they all generally had the same values and beliefs. It's
Speaker 2: only now we're seeing in this twenty first set of
Speaker 2: immigration that we're seeing large populations come over with completely
Speaker 2: opposite belief systems in law, religion, their culture is completely different.
Speaker 2: So this is where we are starting to see major
Speaker 2: issues here.
Speaker 1: And lack of development, that lack of human characteristics.
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, and this misunderstanding still believe today because you know,
Speaker 2: if and I've been in these conversations even in the
Speaker 2: last few days about the replacement theory and what is
Speaker 2: the ultimate goal of all of this multiculturalism. They these
Speaker 2: people that defend it, which are progressive liberals, radical social reformers,
Speaker 2: they don't even know it. They will tell you this
Speaker 2: is no different than the immigration that happened in the
Speaker 2: eighteen hundreds. Well we're showing, we're i mean, it's pretty
Speaker 2: plain to see and self evident. It's really another instance
Speaker 2: where we don't really have to, you know, defend our
Speaker 2: argument is that there are totally two different groups of people.
Speaker 2: Ones coming from you know, Western Europe, all largely white,
Speaker 2: and the other one's coming from the Middle East totally
Speaker 2: opposed in Africa oriented exactly opposite and Africa, yeah, of
Speaker 2: our white culture here.
Speaker 1: So if you have pure distilled water in one glass
Speaker 1: and then you take let's just let's just use their
Speaker 1: number eight million parts and add that to three hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty million parts, and that and that eight million
Speaker 1: parts is poison? What do you have in that glass?
Speaker 1: Is it poison or is it still drinkable?
Speaker 2: And would you take that tense that diluted poison for sure?
Speaker 2: And to what degree poison makes up the water? Is
Speaker 2: exactly that degree of vulnerability we talk about with blissful ignorance.
Speaker 2: It's exactly a great analogy.
Speaker 4: Suggests that in this time of instability, the upper class
Speaker 4: is the Anglo Saxons in the United States wanted to
Speaker 4: somehow control a changing country, and the way they saw
Speaker 4: of controlling it was eugenics. We need to firm up
Speaker 4: our gene pool. So was that anxiety that got moved
Speaker 4: into this eugenics movement, and they combined it with the
Speaker 4: new science of genetics that was emerging, and they came
Speaker 4: up with these crazy sterilization laws.
Speaker 7: So at the time the establishment.
Speaker 2: And if you know anything about our work, we've already
Speaker 2: cast a lot of doubt onto the origins of genetics itself.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. Yeah, it has everything to do with their nutritional
Speaker 1: deficiencies that will cause the disruptions and the changing of
Speaker 1: what they call turning off epigenetics.
Speaker 2: Ooh, that's very interesting stuff. Yeah, because you know Gregory
Speaker 2: bates is named after greg Or Mendel, who is, according
Speaker 2: to the mainstream, the founder of genetics. Yet when you
Speaker 2: look into it like we have, it's actually Gregory Bateson's father,
Speaker 2: William Bateson, that's the true founder and the pusher of
Speaker 2: genetics into the public lexicon and normalizing what they previously
Speaker 2: had called Mendel haru heredity. And so he was studying
Speaker 2: peas in a pod. And this is the science from
Speaker 2: which our entire science or the scientific discipline or field
Speaker 2: of genetics comes from the studying of peas in a pod.
Speaker 8: Plishment of the United States saw the threat as the
Speaker 8: mass of immigration, the waves of immigration of Jews, of Italians.
Speaker 4: Yes, and there were best selling books, a book by
Speaker 4: Madison Grant called The Passing of the Great Race, and
Speaker 4: this was about how whites around the world were in danger.
Speaker 4: They were being swamped by the so called colored people everywhere.
Speaker 4: These were real anxieties adopted at the highest levels. And
Speaker 4: in The Great Gatsby there's actually a scene in which
Speaker 4: Daisy Buchanan's husband Tom, at a party, begins going off
Speaker 4: about this book he's read about how the colored people
Speaker 4: are taking over the world that actually was representative of
Speaker 4: the fears of the upper classes of America, and it
Speaker 4: got channeled into eugenics.
Speaker 2: Same thing happening today right now.
Speaker 8: The White House President Theodore Roosevelt wrote in a magazine quote,
Speaker 8: I wish very much that the wrong people could be
Speaker 8: prevented entirely from breeding. Feeble minded person should be forbidden
Speaker 8: to leave offspring behind them.
Speaker 2: He was a Freemason, Yeah, thirty third degree freemason. He's
Speaker 2: the whole reason why the House of Truth was created
Speaker 2: in the first place. He's the whole reason why the
Speaker 2: New Republic magazine was created. Theodore Roosevelt the founding progressive
Speaker 2: in that his Bull Moose Party presidential campaign platform is
Speaker 2: the first ever progressive platform. And for people who go
Speaker 2: ahead goo nope, I was finished.
Speaker 1: I was gonna say for people who you know, say, well,
Speaker 1: our founders were Freemasons. Yeah, they were found They were
Speaker 1: Freemasons prior to seventeen eighties, when the infiltration of the
Speaker 1: Francis and the Jesuits into those lodges changed it forever
Speaker 1: and made it into Illuminati style stuff and started subverting
Speaker 1: every place that they were at. And then at that point,
Speaker 1: when you're talking about thrudo Roosevelt fast forward into the history.
Speaker 1: Being a freemason wasn't the same thing anymore, right, It
Speaker 1: was a way to hide your subversive tactics in your
Speaker 1: groups of poison, your infiltrators. Yes.
Speaker 2: And you know, according to the official narrative, Theodore Roosevelt
Speaker 2: doesn't win that presidential campaign and become the figure for
Speaker 2: progressivism that Woodrow Wilson did because he actually stopped short
Speaker 2: of wanting to experiment on the US Constitution. This is
Speaker 2: sort of the official narrative that they started by wanting
Speaker 2: to be a Roosevelt bullhorn, and they wanted to use
Speaker 2: the House of Truth in the New Republic to promote
Speaker 2: him back into the presidency. But when he balked at
Speaker 2: experimentation on the US Constitution, it is said that they
Speaker 2: switched their allegiances quickly to Woodrow Wilson, who was under
Speaker 2: the hand of Brandeis the whole time. Brandeis was the
Speaker 2: first to pick Wilson and stayed with them, and then
Speaker 2: you can see everybody shifts over to port Wilson after that.
Speaker 1: I think I think that's maybe what they told Roosevelt
Speaker 1: in the first place, and I think they bolstered him
Speaker 1: up because the only way they could get him as
Speaker 1: through as ego. So they told him that he actually
Speaker 1: was intended to win, But I don't think he ever was.
Speaker 1: I think the Botanice Party was just to poll votes
Speaker 1: from both sides just to just so that, you know,
Speaker 1: just like what they did with Lincoln, like he he
Speaker 1: had them less than thirty percent of the vote or
Speaker 1: something like that when he made president. But it's because
Speaker 1: of that, the three party type of thing that was
Speaker 1: going on.
Speaker 2: The splitting of the vote, and Roosevelt actually comes out
Speaker 2: of the jungle at the last minute to become to
Speaker 2: run against Taft in the Republican race. And I think
Speaker 2: it's here that he establishes the progressive era so he
Speaker 2: can have his own party. So it's out of that
Speaker 2: that progressivism comes, you know.
Speaker 4: I was on the Amtrak the other day and I
Speaker 4: just happen to be next to a revered Americans, may
Speaker 4: rired Reeves, and we were talking about this happened. He
Speaker 4: had just finished a book about the Japanese Internment, and
Speaker 4: he said he was shocked to learn that FDR was
Speaker 4: actually EU Genesis too. And one of the things animating
Speaker 4: the Japanese Internment was that FDR thought that the Japanese were,
Speaker 4: you know, inferior. So this was widely held by people
Speaker 4: that we as a country still admire.
Speaker 9: Even to talk about the US nineteen twenty four.
Speaker 1: They these are their people that got them here. But
Speaker 1: once they're dead or once they've you know, conceded to
Speaker 1: being the scapegoat, they burned those They burned those people
Speaker 1: in criticism so that it looks like they're separate from them,
Speaker 1: and so it goes, and so the system is perpetuated.
Speaker 7: You know.
Speaker 2: Littman's a great example of that. He plays the dialectic
Speaker 2: to a tee his entire life throughout the twentieth century.
Speaker 2: I'm going to let this play. I've got to go
Speaker 2: for about a minute and i'll be back.
Speaker 6: Or Immigration Act and how it was praised by Hitler
Speaker 6: in mind com So could you talk about the act
Speaker 6: itself and how it was linked to this growing support
Speaker 6: for eugenics.
Speaker 4: Yes, it was largely, in large part motivated by eugenics.
Speaker 4: So here this villain of the book that I mentioned,
Speaker 4: Harry Laughlin, he was actually appointed expert eugenics agent to Congress.
Speaker 4: There's letterhead from the US House Committee on Immigration that
Speaker 4: says expert eugenics. You testified about the eugenic advantage and
Speaker 4: disadvantages of various nationalities, and he persuaded Congress that Eastern
Speaker 4: European Jews, Italians, Asians were genetically inferior and we had
Speaker 4: to keep them out. That ends up being translated into
Speaker 4: the nineteen twenty four law, which puts in place for
Speaker 4: the first time national quotas, so you can no longer
Speaker 4: just show up at Ellis Island. If you're coming from
Speaker 4: some countries, we don't want you. If you're coming from
Speaker 4: England and Northern Europe, we do want you. So this
Speaker 4: ended up completely changing the national composition of immigration, and
Speaker 4: it was because certain people were deemed to be inferior.
Speaker 4: And one thing that I thought about when I wrote
Speaker 4: the book is when we read the diary of Ann
Speaker 4: Frank and we realized that she died in the concentration camp,
Speaker 4: we think about how she did it. We thought the
Speaker 4: Jews were a lesser race, and that's why they were
Speaker 4: put in. Frank's father was actually trying to get her
Speaker 4: and the family.
Speaker 1: Everything they just said about Ann Frank is a complete
Speaker 1: fucking lie and that's been verified. But hey, I digress.
Speaker 2: Sorry you can see how there's multiple narratives on top
Speaker 2: of narratives on top of narratives of bullshit. Right, it's
Speaker 2: veils of bullshit that these people inside of the system
Speaker 2: still believed to be true. And and the story of
Speaker 2: Anne Frank is one of them.
Speaker 4: Yep, to America. He was writing repeatedly to the State
Speaker 4: Department for visas. He was turned down. He was turned
Speaker 4: down because of this nineteen twenty four act. So when
Speaker 4: we hear that Anne Frank died in a concentration camp,
Speaker 4: it's also writers that thought the Jews were an inferior race.
Speaker 8: Now interestingly using his daughter, course, and one of those
Speaker 8: who believed in eugenics was the and they do this
Speaker 8: Supreme Court Justice Louis brand.
Speaker 4: That's absolutely right. And you know, it's the great mysteries
Speaker 4: is why someone like that would would take that view.
Speaker 4: And Louis Brandice never talked about it. And again it's
Speaker 4: it's part of our history that's been airbrushed out with book.
Speaker 4: I was very excited to get a major biography.
Speaker 2: I'm just gonna pause it there for a second.
Speaker 1: Goes clip to the eyes. Look at that. There's no
Speaker 1: there's no there's no little stems on there that's just
Speaker 1: clipped to the to the notice I think, yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: just like the matrix classes, remember they.
Speaker 2: That's very interesting because he is the true architect of
Speaker 2: the matrix and our research more and more every day.
Speaker 2: I've got stuff coming out next week with Andy that's
Speaker 2: going to blow everybody's mind about how this is actually
Speaker 2: the matrix that we're living in and he is a
Speaker 2: primary architect.
Speaker 1: Oh, I see how it is. You're gonna tell Andy
Speaker 1: You're not can tell us?
Speaker 2: Well, yes, I'm going to tease here for Andy Shall
Speaker 2: And that is what I'm gonna do because you know, hey,
Speaker 2: this is great because we're going down avenues here that
Speaker 2: I'm promoting with Andy Rouse saying hey, you got to
Speaker 2: tune in on Wednesday mornings with Bulletproof with Daniel and
Speaker 2: I because we're going in this other area showing and exposing,
Speaker 2: you know, other realities. So yeah, I encourage everybody to
Speaker 2: find me on Sunday night, six six pm Pacific, and.
Speaker 1: To that, I just have the same way. I'm not
Speaker 1: your step in Stone.
Speaker 2: So I will say this that we are getting into
Speaker 2: the second phase cybernetics, and this is where the cybernetician
Speaker 2: social engineers, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bates and start to evaluate
Speaker 2: the control of society. But all like the social sciences
Speaker 2: and this cybernetic movement was really the observation of society.
Speaker 2: But second phase cybernetics is the observation of society, including themselves,
Speaker 2: observing and applying sciences back in. So from that perspective,
Speaker 2: they are high level grand strategists. Right, if you think
Speaker 2: about what kind of position you would be in where
Speaker 2: you were looking at the cyberneticians influencing society, you are
Speaker 2: three levels removed in your disinterestedness and your clinician. Right,
Speaker 2: you're no care for human So this is where we're
Speaker 2: going on Sunday night. The economic man is what they
Speaker 2: called it, Homo economicus, and the administrative man, so they
Speaker 2: are actually we talk about the changing images of a man, well,
Speaker 2: they are now going to move it out of They're
Speaker 2: going to so they created the man to successfully integrate
Speaker 2: with the manufactory and pushing of buttons and the pulling
Speaker 2: of levers, kind of like the just kidding. And then
Speaker 2: you can see in this after the twenties, in the thirties,
Speaker 2: forties and fifties, the second phase of cybernetics is now
Speaker 2: starting to develop the human being into an economic man
Speaker 2: person that's going to be inside of a corporation, not
Speaker 2: a manufactory. And so that's all I'm going to say
Speaker 2: about that. Tune in on Sunday night and we go
Speaker 2: deep into this on the Deep Share.
Speaker 1: And thanks for reminding me. I have some listeners too
Speaker 1: on the way to San Diego today.
Speaker 4: Yes, this is really key, written by a very respected
Speaker 4: law professor, nine hundred pages, and I was looking to
Speaker 4: see how he explains this. It only mentions Buck versus
Speaker 4: Bell in a footnote. No one wants to talk about
Speaker 4: this part of Louis Brandeis's legal career well Versust.
Speaker 2: And that's just a little tiny window into the suppression,
Speaker 2: the censorship that is surrounding this guy. So when I
Speaker 2: go onto archive dot org and I find book that's
Speaker 2: out of print, a lot of the times I can
Speaker 2: just save, right click save image and save that image
Speaker 2: in two clicks. Anything that mentions brand Eyes, I can't.
Speaker 2: They don't give me the right click save image option.
Speaker 2: I actually have to take two separate screenshots of the
Speaker 2: page and put them together in paint and then start
Speaker 2: to categorize them into proper files that way. So this
Speaker 2: is just a little subtle way that they keep They
Speaker 2: make it a little harder for anybody that's investigating brand Eyes.
Speaker 2: And this foot small little footnote in seventeen hundred page
Speaker 2: documents you know, that are claiming to be the omniscient
Speaker 2: view of law, shows that they are hiding brand Eyes.
Speaker 2: And this is what the gatekeepers and the limited hangouts,
Speaker 2: the controlled opposition, They are hiding the face of this
Speaker 2: man right here.
Speaker 1: It's like, hey, can we maybe, like you know, talk
Speaker 1: about law without referencing this guy in the footnotes? Oh no, okay, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm sure it's not from the same source then.
Speaker 2: And he's one of the most cited US Supreme Court
Speaker 2: justices of all time. He made major changes, as we've
Speaker 2: talked about in labor you like we talked last week,
Speaker 2: DARPA has a surveillance program named after him. Okay because
Speaker 2: his of his Harvard Law Review article right to privacy. Okay,
Speaker 2: But really what he was doing was giving privacy to
Speaker 2: corporations to act in any way that they wanted, under
Speaker 2: the guise of giving the individual privacy. Well, we can
Speaker 2: clearly see the television I'm looking at right now, maybe
Speaker 2: listening to me as.
Speaker 1: I speak right now, so maybe yeah, definitely.
Speaker 2: Well it is a smart TV, so I'd say one
Speaker 2: hundred percent. So you know, this is the kind of
Speaker 2: hindsight that we can use to capitalize and overthrow this
Speaker 2: whole progressive mantra that this man made construct, that we're
Speaker 2: always moving forward, we always must have the next latest technology.
Speaker 2: Why because the socialists, these controllers of society, are at
Speaker 2: the helm of the breaking or the cutting edge of technology.
Speaker 2: It's the socialists.
Speaker 1: And you make a good point too, because there's a routine,
Speaker 1: common theme that continues to repeat itself, and that is,
Speaker 1: you know, demand the worker, just like with the Marxist
Speaker 1: Communist Revolution, the Bolsheviks and all that stuff. It's always
Speaker 1: you know, for the worker, YadA YadA, worker party, labor party, YadA, YadA, YadA.
Speaker 1: And then as soon as they attain their power, who
Speaker 1: is the first person for people to suffer the most?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Labor, because yeah, what's the greatest cost to the manufacturer,
Speaker 2: the capitalists, to the owner of the factory, but labor.
Speaker 2: And if they can eliminate labor, they're going to make
Speaker 2: a hell of a lot more money, and they're going
Speaker 2: to have a hell of a lot less issues. We've
Speaker 2: gone through that in Brandei's Part six. I think industrial democracy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, one of the substituges of this port strike of
Speaker 1: the long shore mine is that they were upset that
Speaker 1: they were going to be uh installing automation and they're
Speaker 1: gonna they they're gerbs, and that's part of it. But
Speaker 1: also because apparently being the highest paid union workers on
Speaker 1: the planet, it wasn't sufficient. So that's the other reasoning.
Speaker 1: But you know, without any and somebody brought this up,
Speaker 1: without any eyes on the docks, they could this. This
Speaker 1: was Nick who said this, our friend Nicodemus. Uh, if
Speaker 1: they were planning an attack on us, well if hey,
Speaker 1: what the hell there's a tsunami coming because of that
Speaker 1: second moon, who knows. But you know, at least now
Speaker 1: there's not gonna be any eyes on it for early
Speaker 1: warning that something strange is happening in the on the
Speaker 1: East coast because it's going to be vacant. And then
Speaker 1: you know, also when you vacate your your job, you
Speaker 1: can in your union. Well you just gave them license
Speaker 1: basically to put that automation in that you were just
Speaker 1: talking about. You were trying to pose because now you're
Speaker 1: not there. And and also scab workers all rats sometimes
Speaker 1: so they kind of shoot themselves in the foot here.
Speaker 2: And the whole idea of trade unionism established by the
Speaker 2: ethical socialists, the Fabians and trade unionism really, when you
Speaker 2: look at it honestly, is the scientific expert getting between
Speaker 2: you and your most valued possession, your own labor.
Speaker 1: So can you can you read that on the bottom,
Speaker 1: because maybe we that's something we can look at in
Speaker 1: the next Wednesday or something like that. Sherman Anti Trust Act.
Speaker 2: Sherman Anti Trust, this is exactly. This is where brand
Speaker 2: Eye and and other attorneys. But it's really brandized that
Speaker 2: you know, they break up Standard Oil. This is really
Speaker 2: the big name that they broke up Standard Oil. But
Speaker 2: when you look BP exon Chevron Shell now they're all
Speaker 2: subsidiaries of Standard Oil. It is again back to this
Speaker 2: illusion of competition. I can show you an image if
Speaker 2: you remind me, I'll show you this image that shows
Speaker 2: that over the twentieth century, Standard Oil actually made lots
Speaker 2: more money than they would have if they would have
Speaker 2: just stayed Standard Oil.
Speaker 1: And they still control but it was just the illusion
Speaker 1: of exactly exactly.
Speaker 2: And so yep, Rockefeller's deeply involved in the creation of this.
Speaker 2: He's he I'm not sure if he was interviewed. I
Speaker 2: think he was in this Poojo Committee investigation. This is
Speaker 2: where they brought into effect this Sherman anti trust laws
Speaker 2: and broke the trusts. And Teddy Roosevelt's leading that too, right,
Speaker 2: the muckrakers. He's the one that calls them the muckrakers.
Speaker 2: And who are the muckrakers? I've got them all on
Speaker 2: the back here, this one right here, that's Lincoln Stephens.
Speaker 2: Lincoln Stephens, he's a socialist. He goes and meets with Lennon.
Speaker 2: He's a close personal friend of Walter Littman. He's actually
Speaker 2: his mentor. And I've got excited in there. That's like
Speaker 2: a hundred year old book. They talk about it clearly,
Speaker 2: and so yeah, good point by Polka. Two two Rockefellers
Speaker 2: are involved in this, and it's all just a sham.
Speaker 1: There's a there's a book called The Criminal Insanity of
Speaker 1: Theodore Roosevelt by Michael S. King that uh should be
Speaker 1: it should be read. But there's also a lot of
Speaker 1: books by ms King that go into the ruis velts
Speaker 1: quite extensively, and I think people should check that out,
Speaker 1: including The Bad War. This another book you should in
Speaker 1: addition to check out of them, Miss Kings. They're all
Speaker 1: banned for me Amazon, So I think you have to
Speaker 1: go to wherever you'll find that Miska. Okay, yeah, it's
Speaker 1: it's interesting stuff. He's got one on Wilson too, that's
Speaker 1: a real eye opener. Short books, really fast reading. It's
Speaker 1: like an essay format. It's like June bullet points. It's
Speaker 1: easy to get through a lot of info.
Speaker 2: Right, And I've got some books here on Roosevelt too.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna go let's experiment here, let's try full screen again.
Speaker 1: I've had my MS King on before, but he's a
Speaker 1: little on the Trump's gonna save us things. So I
Speaker 1: think I offered to have him come back on. I
Speaker 1: don't think he wanted to, but it could just be
Speaker 1: he didn't get the message.
Speaker 2: Okay, so you see the evolution of standard oiler. I
Speaker 2: do look at that. So on the far left, we've
Speaker 2: got standard oil. And here is where the the trusts,
Speaker 2: the Sherman Anti Trust. It states it right here. In
Speaker 2: nineteen eleven, the US Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: Can territory this way basic with a refuge that there's
Speaker 1: somebody else. It's so easy see that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So then we think that the gas prices are
Speaker 2: all set through regulated competition, which is what Brandeis himself
Speaker 2: actually created too. But we see that there's no such thing.
Speaker 1: And it's funny because Standard Standard or Rockefeller in general
Speaker 1: was like the precursor to what black Rock is now, right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: owning everything.
Speaker 2: But and the Council on Foreign Relations, right, And who
Speaker 2: creates that but Brandisee Litman, And this is the inquiry
Speaker 2: the preparations to peace. These are the guys that created
Speaker 2: those maps we talked about earlier.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And what this actually does is that when you
Speaker 1: understand the power behind these separate companies, they're going to
Speaker 1: be destroying competition. Anybody who's in a private sector trying
Speaker 1: to do the same thing that they are. The smaller
Speaker 1: guy is going to be eliminated because they can undercut them.
Speaker 1: They can lose money on the way there, because they're
Speaker 1: going to be funded artificially from their central banking system
Speaker 1: so that they can fail upward while they're destroying your business.
Speaker 2: And you can clearly see a partnership between brandise and
Speaker 2: Standard Oil, Rockefellers and all of these guys in that.
Speaker 2: You know, these guys dominate their industry and then Brandeise
Speaker 2: comes in with regulated competition, so now there's no more competition.
Speaker 2: They've dominated and won the oil industry and now it's
Speaker 2: like burning the bridge behind them. Nobody else can follow.
Speaker 2: So two things I want to point out here.
Speaker 3: Is S.
Speaker 1: Actually a miss standard, that's funny.
Speaker 2: Eastern State Standard Oil. Okay, Eastern State Standard Oil. And Exon.
Speaker 2: Look at this here mm hmm. The double cross.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, the X itself is also significant, So there's
Speaker 1: symbology there.
Speaker 2: Well we are we are implying not Freemasons, but the
Speaker 2: ones before that, the defenders of Christianity. Right, yes, this
Speaker 2: is a templar's symbol. We just kind of gloss over it.
Speaker 2: But there it is Exon. And today this doesn't include Shell,
Speaker 2: but just recently, within the last I don't know five years,
Speaker 2: Shell has become a subsidiary of Standard too. So they
Speaker 2: dominate the market. And that's just one, you know, just
Speaker 2: the oil industry, gas industry.
Speaker 1: Someone said that they were making an analogy for something else.
Speaker 1: I can't remember what it was, but they were like,
Speaker 1: oh no, no, okay, So yeah, it was doctor Peter
Speaker 1: g Linnen and he was talking about how allopathy made
Speaker 1: itself the uh, the ruler through through legislation, through through law,
Speaker 1: that they were the ones them was the only for
Speaker 1: people who could tell, you know, signify who the doctor
Speaker 1: is and with practice medicine. Yeah, Like it's like that's
Speaker 1: the same as like the government telling you that only
Speaker 1: Exxon can can sell gas. And it's funny that he
Speaker 1: says that because in reality, it's the same company everywhere,
Speaker 1: you know, it's the only one that's selling gas.
Speaker 2: And and where does the pharmaceutical company get a lot
Speaker 2: of their things but oil products?
Speaker 8: Right right?
Speaker 2: And and who was Rockefeller's father but a snake oil salesman.
Speaker 1: Literally literally and a horse.
Speaker 4: And a rapist.
Speaker 2: Apparently he was. He was running around the nation one
Speaker 2: step ahead of rape charges.
Speaker 1: Probably the horses too, I mean.
Speaker 2: Probably the horses too at this point, I won't put
Speaker 2: it past them. Okay, So there's our buddy Louis Brandais
Speaker 2: again that looks a lot like Abraham Lincoln.
Speaker 9: Bill was decided eight to one. So who was the
Speaker 9: one dissenting judge?
Speaker 4: One descenting judge was actually the one Catholic on the court.
Speaker 4: And interesting figure, the one group that really did oppose
Speaker 4: the Jacks movement was the Catholic Church. They believed both
Speaker 4: in the idea of reproduction, which we see in the
Speaker 4: abortion issue, but also.
Speaker 1: Leave and reproduction.
Speaker 4: Judge, there's weird way to say that, not by these
Speaker 4: external qualities that the eugenesis were focusing on. So when
Speaker 4: there were sterilizational law bills that were put up before
Speaker 4: legislatures around the country, the one group that would consistently
Speaker 4: show up to oppose them was Catholics.
Speaker 2: Nuns pre another siren going by my house here. I
Speaker 2: don't think you can hear that, but I hear them.
Speaker 2: It's like all day. I'm a ham radio opera, so
Speaker 2: I have a receiver here and when I want, I
Speaker 2: can listen. And it is unbelievable because they never go
Speaker 2: to fires. What they're doing is going to man down calls,
Speaker 2: and those are the drug addicted homeless here. And this
Speaker 2: is really the full time job of the firefighters, especially after.
Speaker 1: Coldless people who got shots. I was about to say, yeah, putting.
Speaker 2: Out fires in garbage cans in the winter, this is
Speaker 2: all they do. They rarely put out a house.
Speaker 1: Fire, burn barrels. That's funny.
Speaker 4: East Catholic lead people and there were states like Louisiana
Speaker 4: with large Catholic populations where bills were voted down really
Speaker 4: because of the opposition of the Catholic Church.
Speaker 8: So let's talk about sterilization, wearing the jesuits at we're
Speaker 8: talking about up to seventy thousand people, mainly women, but
Speaker 8: a number of men.
Speaker 7: What were the operations they were put through? Where did
Speaker 7: this happen?
Speaker 2: That's a conservative number, right, because we know about Tuskegee.
Speaker 2: But you know, when we know the mk Ultra programs
Speaker 2: and the Macy conferences that that number of unwitting citizens
Speaker 2: of America being experiment on is in the millions. There's
Speaker 2: no doubt in my mind. Well, especially now, we're in
Speaker 2: probably the tens and hundreds of millions of people being
Speaker 2: experimented on by this same movement. It's just been put
Speaker 2: sort of underground, normalized.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, anybody who goes to their doctor and
Speaker 1: takes a drug and goes and gets a shot, they're
Speaker 1: being experimented on.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I mean we just went through COVID, so
Speaker 2: that was forced inoculation. So we're in the hundreds of
Speaker 2: millions of people into the billions of people now because
Speaker 2: why we haven't caught onto the trick that this guy's
Speaker 2: hiding that we are showing at Bulletproof pub dot com,
Speaker 2: that Daniel's helping to broaden our influence so that more
Speaker 2: people can see. So, now that's a second siren going by.
Speaker 2: I swear it's three four times a day and every night.
Speaker 1: Now you good for couple seconds. I'm discussed up, can
Speaker 1: real quick? I gott to check something.
Speaker 2: Sure, yeah, all letter role here.
Speaker 4: It's kind of Barbara to think about. And actually before
Speaker 4: in the earliest days of eugenics, it started out with castration,
Speaker 4: and the eugenesis were having trouble getting legislators to adopt
Speaker 4: eugenic sterilization laws because people didn't like the idea of
Speaker 4: actually castrating people. And it was actually the medical advances,
Speaker 4: the rise of the visectomy and the salpingectomy, which is
Speaker 4: what was done to women, the quarterizing of the Filippian
Speaker 4: tubes that made it a little bit more palatable. But
Speaker 4: these were still terrible operations, and you can imagine what
Speaker 4: surgery was like in the nineteen twenties. So someone like
Speaker 4: carry Buck was sterilized at the Colony for Epileptics and
Speaker 4: feeble minded by the man the doctor who was the
Speaker 4: superintendent of the colony, and it was a terribly invasive operation.
Speaker 4: She had to recover for two weeks. They cut her open,
Speaker 4: and you know, all kinds of anesthesia and medical procedures
Speaker 4: were rather primitive then. So this is what the government
Speaker 4: was doing. I mean, you think about governmental invasion of
Speaker 4: your rights. Now we're concerned as we should be about
Speaker 4: the government, you know, reading our emails and listen into
Speaker 4: our phone calls. They are operating on women and men
Speaker 4: in this most barbaric way, and I mean, it's really shocking.
Speaker 4: And as we've seen, the Supreme Court eight to one
Speaker 4: said not only that this is fine, but the Supreme
Speaker 4: Court encouraged the nation to do more. It said, you know,
Speaker 4: not only is the Virginia law constitution constitutional, not only
Speaker 4: is it okay to sterilize carry back, we need more
Speaker 4: of these operations.
Speaker 7: So first it's the vilification of immigrants.
Speaker 1: And then.
Speaker 2: So first of all, to blame Oliver Wendell Holmes is
Speaker 2: to also eliminate William Howard Taft, skull and bones from
Speaker 2: the argument. And Louis brandeis all three Phi beta kappa two.
Speaker 7: By the way, that's the step.
Speaker 4: Yes, you know, the Genesis were trying to protect the
Speaker 4: gene pool. So they saw an external threat and an
Speaker 4: internal threat, and they were dressing them at the same time. Externally,
Speaker 4: they thought, these lesser people are coming into the country,
Speaker 4: They're going to harm our gene pool. We have to
Speaker 4: keep them Outternly, they started looking around the country and
Speaker 4: asking who are the people here who have bad genes
Speaker 4: who we need to eliminate. So they looked at people
Speaker 4: like Carrie Buck, who was poor, who was under educated,
Speaker 4: and they said, that's the kind of people we need
Speaker 4: to stop.
Speaker 7: Internally, what happened to Carrie Buck afterwards.
Speaker 4: Well, you know, her story is so sad. So she
Speaker 4: did have a baby that was a result of this
Speaker 4: rape that ended up putting her in the colony for
Speaker 4: epileptics and people minded. They had promised her throughout the proceeding,
Speaker 4: and this isn't the legal briefs that one good thing
Speaker 4: about her being sterilized is she would be returned to
Speaker 4: her foster family, which was actually raising her baby, so
Speaker 4: at least she would be able to spend her life
Speaker 4: raising her daughter, Vivian. But in fact, as soon as
Speaker 4: they get the court order that she can be sterilized,
Speaker 4: and she sterilized. They asked the Dobbs family, her foster
Speaker 4: family to take her back, and the Dobbs family said, well, no,
Speaker 4: actually we don't want her. So she doesn't get to
Speaker 4: live with her baby. And then she gets put in
Speaker 4: a series of household placements where she becomes a housekeeper.
Speaker 4: She marries a couple of times, but she always wanted.
Speaker 2: Sorry. One thing I want to also I know is
Speaker 2: that there's multiple globes spinning in the background babies.
Speaker 4: And at the end of her life she said that
Speaker 4: she sherely wished she'd had a family and she didn't.
Speaker 4: And one other sad part of the story is that
Speaker 4: people who knew her later in life said she absolutely
Speaker 4: was not feeble minded. When she was at her retirement home,
Speaker 4: she loved getting the newspaper every day, and she used
Speaker 4: to work on the crossrod puzzle. And one other said,
Speaker 4: there's so many sad parts of the story. But she
Speaker 4: had a sister, Doris, who was also at the colony.
Speaker 4: Doris was sterilized shortly after she was Years later, when
Speaker 4: she was an old woman, she wanted to get Social
Speaker 4: Security and she wrote to the colony to find out
Speaker 4: how old she was because she didn't know, and the
Speaker 4: colony director came and visited her and told her that
Speaker 4: she was old enough for Social Security. He also told
Speaker 4: her that she had been sterilized. She and her husband
Speaker 4: began crying because they had been trying their whole lives
Speaker 4: to have children. No one had ever told her that
Speaker 4: the government had sterilized her. She had been told that
Speaker 4: she had appened nect to me, And when she went
Speaker 4: to the doctor, he said, you have this scar, and
Speaker 4: she said, yeah, it's because they did. It appened next
Speaker 4: to me, on me. They'd actually sterilized her and her
Speaker 4: whole life. She never knew.
Speaker 2: Is there a dirty or trick that's so sick? I mean,
Speaker 2: this is the very basis of our humanity.
Speaker 1: They stole her baby. This is a This is like
Speaker 1: old CPS, before CPS.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and no mention of the rapist either, right, who,
Speaker 2: for all we know, could have been Oliver Wendel Holmes himself.
Speaker 1: Who knows could have been something.
Speaker 6: Last year, Virginia agreed to compensate victims of state sponsored
Speaker 6: for sterilization. The state agreed each surviving victim twenty five
Speaker 6: thousand dollars. Lewis Reynolds is among those who received compensation.
Speaker 6: At the age of thirteen, Reynolds was incorrectly diagnosed with epilepsy,
Speaker 6: resulting in his four sterilization. Reynolds wasn't even aware that
Speaker 6: the state had conducted the operation until he and his
Speaker 6: wife encountered troubles starting a family. Years later, Reynolds spoke
Speaker 6: to our tea about the pain of never being able
Speaker 6: to have children.
Speaker 5: Look, they had a payment and and Kuen and grand
Speaker 5: k and too, And I wonder sometime what would I
Speaker 5: be like a power to my.
Speaker 2: Que and.
Speaker 5: If I could have and excuse me and and play
Speaker 5: with them and everything.
Speaker 2: And it's like everybody.
Speaker 6: That was Lewis Reynolds speaking to r T a victim,
Speaker 6: one of the many surviving victims of for sterilization. So
Speaker 6: could you talk about Virginia's decision to compensate victims surviving victims?
Speaker 6: And also, much like Carrie buck Lewis Reynolds also wasn't
Speaker 6: told that he'd been subjected to force sterilization.
Speaker 1: So could you imagine them trying to do this now?
Speaker 1: Did you imagine? Because they would never do that, they
Speaker 1: would go after the same type of people, tall white people,
Speaker 1: right basically you know, with this type and this, this
Speaker 1: type of power of government is completely.
Speaker 9: Well.
Speaker 1: First of all, if if the government was was, you know,
Speaker 1: caring about its people, it wouldn't want this rule in
Speaker 1: the first place, and wouldn't exercise it if it had it.
Speaker 1: But the fact that the type of nature of our
Speaker 1: government that we have and have had even back then, Yeah,
Speaker 1: this is not this is a weapon against against mankind.
Speaker 1: It's not doing anything except I mean, look at the people.
Speaker 1: Look at the person that they picked or you know,
Speaker 1: in this one example, who did they go after. They
Speaker 1: went after her. They didn't go after a freaking person
Speaker 1: who does commit crimes, a person who does you know,
Speaker 1: have absolutely nothing going for them except for negative behavior
Speaker 1: and predatorial tendencies. They didn't go after sterilizing those people.
Speaker 2: Right, was harmless? An innocent woman yet.
Speaker 1: And stillhood maybe yep, yep, good point.
Speaker 4: Well, I don't think that they wanted opposition, right. It's
Speaker 4: much easier to sterilize someone against their will if you
Speaker 4: don't tell them what's going on. As with Doris, they said,
Speaker 4: you know, you have a medical problem, you have appendicitis.
Speaker 4: We have to operate on you. You know, if you
Speaker 4: say we want to stop you from having children, maybe
Speaker 4: you get some pushback, so I think it was easier
Speaker 4: for the doctors involved. And then yeah, they have the
Speaker 4: doctor process of reparations, but it was so slow in coming.
Speaker 4: On the seventy fifth anniversary of this case in two
Speaker 4: thousand and two, the governor of Virginia apologized for the
Speaker 4: sterilizations that occurred, but they didn't begin to compensate people.
Speaker 4: Then they just did that this year. So as a result,
Speaker 4: I was actually in Virginia yesterday and someone told me
Speaker 4: that what they had heard is that only eight people
Speaker 4: so far have actually applied for reparations because so many
Speaker 4: have died. Now, if you think about all the people
Speaker 4: who are sterilized in the nineteen twenties and nineteen thirties,
Speaker 4: they and died never being in.
Speaker 1: How does this, how does this, you know, slap the
Speaker 1: hands of the people who did this. The twenty five
Speaker 1: thousand dollars per person that they're given out isn't coming
Speaker 1: from those people. It's coming from the taxpayers. It's a
Speaker 1: government sponsored thing. Anything that they're paying out comes from us,
Speaker 1: so holding us for what they.
Speaker 2: Did, right, And you'll see even today here in Canada,
Speaker 2: we just had two days ago a new holiday called
Speaker 2: truth and reconciliation, and they're doing the same thing.
Speaker 1: There is that from the Native Americans that they murdered
Speaker 1: as a residential.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the ones that they're saying they the bodies that
Speaker 2: they found in residential schools and ship But you know,
Speaker 2: there is a great doubt cast on this fact that
Speaker 2: they state that there's bodies found in these residential schools. No,
Speaker 2: I'm not necessarily sure that that even happened.
Speaker 1: No, that's that's not correct. What No, they Kevin Annett
Speaker 1: has been working on this since the nineties. He's he
Speaker 1: was a Catholic priest at the time, and he exposed
Speaker 1: a lot of this crap. Uh, that's it.
Speaker 2: Well, the Queen also there's a there's a there's it's
Speaker 2: not called a warrant for rest here in Canada, but
Speaker 2: there is still officially a document that is calling for
Speaker 2: the Queen to come here and to testify as to
Speaker 2: where a bunch of these missing natives went. Yes, I
Speaker 2: totally agree that it's a travesty. But what they're using
Speaker 2: in the mainstream to catalyze everybody.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, but I mean as far as like less
Speaker 1: than fifty percent of them survived during the and they
Speaker 1: were doing all kinds of experiments on them, they're killing them.
Speaker 1: There's all kinds of documentation that to verify all that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, all I'm saying is all I'm saying is that
Speaker 2: they're most definitely using it as a dialectic to bring
Speaker 2: in social reform. We have before every hockey game, here
Speaker 2: an Indian chief in full garb. They're dropping the parker
Speaker 2: welcoming everybody to the building. And this is a former
Speaker 2: Indian land that you were watching this hockey game on
Speaker 2: and you know, and you can see affiliation with this.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's liberalism taking right totally.
Speaker 2: You can see the parallels between the the LGBTQ movement
Speaker 2: and this truth and reconciliation movement.
Speaker 1: But that's yeah, that's that's taking away from the fact
Speaker 1: that real children, many of lots of them died, you know,
Speaker 1: in disease states because of malnutrition and starvation and right,
Speaker 1: so many of them died or were beaten to death
Speaker 1: by nuns, all kinds of stuff.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I wouldn't say that that's an invalid point.
Speaker 2: I'm just stating that there is questions as to some
Speaker 2: of the most sensational stories that the mainstream has been
Speaker 2: pushing and those ones are the ones that tug on
Speaker 2: the heartstrings. The most are liberal sentimentalities, but most certainly,
Speaker 2: I mean, we're showing that the entire association of American
Speaker 2: universities was built on the bones of murdered America Native Americans.
Speaker 2: So yes, the white man has committed all kinds of atrocities.
Speaker 1: Check up murder by Decree. It's a free book. You
Speaker 1: can find. It's a that's Kevin Adatt.
Speaker 2: What's his name, Kevin?
Speaker 1: What a N N E T T?
Speaker 2: And there goes another siren. This one was not a firetruck,
Speaker 2: but it is some sort of supervisor that siren. So
Speaker 2: I'm not sure where they're going. I could throw on
Speaker 2: the radio and we could probably all hear together.
Speaker 1: But yeah, about ten minutes again, Yeah, we're just about there.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 7: What happened with a law uphild by Buck versus Bell.
Speaker 4: So it actually remained in place for a long time.
Speaker 4: There was a lot more sterilization after the Supreme Court ruling.
Speaker 4: Other states began to adopt such law, as Mississippi passed
Speaker 4: a eugenic sterilization on nineteen twenty eight. Virginia kept its
Speaker 4: on the book books until the nineteen seventies. And it
Speaker 4: was actually sterilizing people through the nineteen seven.
Speaker 7: And Buck versus Bell itself is still the law of
Speaker 7: the land.
Speaker 4: In nineteen forty two, still the law of the land.
Speaker 4: Another eugenic sterilization case out of Oklahoma. They had the
Speaker 4: opportunity to overturn Buck versus Bell. You might think they
Speaker 4: would have, because at that point we were at war
Speaker 4: with the Nazis. The idea of a master race had
Speaker 4: really been discredited. But the Supreme Court, in striking down
Speaker 4: the Oklahoma law, did it very narrowly, and the justice
Speaker 4: who wrote the decision later said they didn't want to
Speaker 4: overturn Buck versus Bell. And incredibly, in two thousand and one,
Speaker 4: the US Court of Appeals in Missouri, which is one
Speaker 4: step below the US Supreme Court, cited Buck versus Bell
Speaker 4: in a case involving sterilization of a mildly mentally retarded woman.
Speaker 4: It is still the law of the land today.
Speaker 7: The parallels today, the parallels.
Speaker 4: Are very strong. Right. So, first of all, there is
Speaker 4: some subterranean eugenic sterilization going on right now. We hear
Speaker 4: about cases in prisons where women are sterilized without their consent.
Speaker 4: There was a case in Tennessee a couple of years
Speaker 4: ago where a prosecutor was fired allegedly for making eugenic
Speaker 4: sterilization part of his plea negotiations. And the danger is,
Speaker 4: as we know, we're in rather strange political times. As
Speaker 4: we talked about the beginning of the show, we don't
Speaker 4: know if there's going to be another eugenics movement. We
Speaker 4: don't know states will start to pass these laws. People
Speaker 4: know if Congress might pass these laws, there's a lot
Speaker 4: of fear in the land. Well, it would be nice
Speaker 4: to think that the US Supreme Court would defend the
Speaker 4: victims of these laws, but right now they're on record
Speaker 4: saying it is constitutional.
Speaker 8: We talked about immigrants. What about African Americans through the
Speaker 8: twenties and the thirties.
Speaker 4: Well, it's a strange story. So in the nineteen twenties,
Speaker 4: the same day that Virginia passed the eugenic sterilization law,
Speaker 4: they passed their Racial Purity Act the exact same day.
Speaker 4: The reason they did that was that the eugenesis of
Speaker 4: that time were so racist that they actually didn't bother
Speaker 4: with eugenics for blacks. They thought the black race was
Speaker 4: beyond saving. Their whole focus was uplifting the white race.
Speaker 4: So they did two things. They built a wall of
Speaker 4: separation between the white and black races. They imposed large
Speaker 4: penalties for any kind of sexual unions between blacks and whites.
Speaker 4: And once they built that wall, they focused on uplifting
Speaker 4: the white race. That's why they were focused on white
Speaker 4: women like Carrie Buck. But then over the years many
Speaker 4: blacks were sterilized, and in places like North Carolina in
Speaker 4: the seventies, it was a lot of poor black people
Speaker 4: who were there.
Speaker 6: Just before we end explain when and why the US
Speaker 6: scientific community gave up on eugenics.
Speaker 4: So at the beginning they were among the biggest cheerleaders.
Speaker 4: The medical journals of the nineteen tens and twenties were
Speaker 4: enthusiastic about eugenics. Harvard geneticists were in favor of eugenics.
Speaker 4: Over time, though it became discredited, I think in part
Speaker 4: because of the rise of the Nazis. So this Eugenics
Speaker 4: Record Office, which was a scientific pro eugenics operation, was
Speaker 4: funded by the Carnegie Institution. They lost their funding in
Speaker 4: the late thirties because of the rise of Nazism.
Speaker 7: Well, Adam Cohen, it's an astounding book.
Speaker 8: The book is called Imbeciles, the Supreme Court, American eugenics,
Speaker 8: and the sterilization of Carrie Buck.
Speaker 7: Adam Cohen is journalist and lawyer.
Speaker 8: Previously member of New York Times Editorial Board, seeingior former
Speaker 8: senior writer for Time Magazine. He's the co editor of
Speaker 8: the National Book Review dot com.
Speaker 2: Okay, so he's on the board of the New York Times,
Speaker 2: and he's a lawyer and JOURNALI these are things that
Speaker 2: shouldn't probably be combined, yet they are.
Speaker 1: At least it's it's it tell for people who can
Speaker 1: understand what that means. Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 2: And so before we go, I just want to show
Speaker 2: the book. We got about five minutes before you got
Speaker 2: to go.
Speaker 1: Yeah, if the name one itself wasn't until enough.
Speaker 2: Yeah, right, and the glasses so you can see there
Speaker 2: at the book this is imbeciles. Can you see that?
Speaker 1: Yep?
Speaker 2: Okay? So I just put in brand Eise into the
Speaker 2: search engine, which I do a lot brand Eized Litman Frankfurter,
Speaker 2: just to see where they're at, and you can see
Speaker 2: there's I think, yeah, twenty seven results. So he goes
Speaker 2: deeper into Brandeis's involvement here, and it looks like just
Speaker 2: from a preliminary look at these quotes that he goes
Speaker 2: in deeper than he did with democracy. Now, and here's
Speaker 2: what I'm showing is that these books are unavailable. They're here,
Speaker 2: and if you have the right letters or words to search,
Speaker 2: you can get the other pages. And as long as
Speaker 2: there is a connection, you can generally get it. As
Speaker 2: you can see, otherwise it would be unavailable. Okay, So
Speaker 2: this is what we see. As soon as you start
Speaker 2: getting within a degree or two of brand Eyes, it
Speaker 2: starts to become very difficult to preserve documents, to catalog
Speaker 2: and categorize, collect you know. So I encourage everybody to
Speaker 2: go there. Look at this book Inbeciles, the Supreme Court,
Speaker 2: American Eugenics and the involvement of the first Jewish US
Speaker 2: Supreme Court justice in the House of Truth. Again in
Speaker 2: this progressive liberal movement.
Speaker 1: Man, oh man, it's almost getting tired to say that
Speaker 1: it's always the same hands within these systems that are
Speaker 1: you know, and foot soldiers. I would say, you know,
Speaker 1: Clindestine being that their frankest and that they're always you know,
Speaker 1: they're cryptos and all that stuff. But this I can
Speaker 1: even go so far as to say that this majority
Speaker 1: of this push or at least their boldness, for it
Speaker 1: has to do everything with their uncle, if you want
Speaker 1: to call it that dominating the world with the finance
Speaker 1: on the Rothschild aspect, that they have boldness first, because
Speaker 1: that's what empowers all these other initiatives in the first place,
Speaker 1: is the fact that they can't fail because they own
Speaker 1: the system. They will they will create the winners and
Speaker 1: the losers with it.
Speaker 2: So and I think that's how Brandeis was so influential,
Speaker 2: because his reputation is involvement with the Rothschild's preceded him.
Speaker 2: You can see through the creation of the Balfour Declaration
Speaker 2: that the Foreign Secretary of the British Government is subsumed
Speaker 2: by the opinion of Brandeis and co.
Speaker 1: And why would he unless he was understanding of where
Speaker 1: his pressure lies, exactly where the pressure would lie if
Speaker 1: he didn't comply. Yeah, I mean the Bank of the
Speaker 1: Bank of England was basically Rothschild owned after was it
Speaker 1: William of Orange I can't remember somebody.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, that's right. In that era, this is when
Speaker 2: they took control of the Bank of England, and progressives
Speaker 2: will tell you today that the Bank of England is
Speaker 2: not infiltrated by the rothschild and it's doing its duty
Speaker 2: to keep everybody out of debt and all that bullshit.
Speaker 2: But you know they're just being fed bullshit and kept
Speaker 2: in the dark like a mushroom, at.
Speaker 1: Least some mushrooms. You know, if they're not some kind
Speaker 1: of nutrients, you can have some fun with them.
Speaker 2: Yes, I agree. So if there's anything else, any other questions,
Speaker 2: we've got to go to a minute.
Speaker 1: This is funny. Let me put this up there, Manco
Speaker 1: capos brandeis is not the droid you're looking for? Move along, yeah,
Speaker 1: move along.
Speaker 2: Yes, apparently he is. And you know, all I did
Speaker 2: was go to search why are society is so governed
Speaker 2: by the scientific technical expert? That's all I did. And
Speaker 2: we found the rise of the expert and really the
Speaker 2: makers of our modern day social contract, the literal matrix.
Speaker 2: And so yeah, tune in next Wednesday. We'll continue in
Speaker 2: the direction of my research. I use these six days
Speaker 2: in between now to continue research, find videos like we've
Speaker 2: gone over and so that we have new fresh material
Speaker 2: and we are moving forward in our research. So you're
Speaker 2: kind of just going along with the forensic historians true
Speaker 2: intellectually honest journey, analytical review of history.
Speaker 1: Without the omission of details along the way, as long
Speaker 1: as we know them using historical methods.
Speaker 2: So maybe next week we can get into historical method
Speaker 2: and the methods used by forensic history and this deductive
Speaker 2: process of gathering artifacts and knowing what is dependable, believable
Speaker 2: of which you can now gain knowledge, or what is
Speaker 2: not a great source and what may be steering you away.
Speaker 1: So yeah, and if I could make a request at
Speaker 1: some point, I would like to get into the timeframe
Speaker 1: of like eighteen fifty nine and some of the details
Speaker 1: around Darwin and the proponents of Darwin that came after
Speaker 1: him that filtered their way into the commercialization of medical sciences.
Speaker 2: Yes, okay, sure we can get into that, because that's
Speaker 2: all connected through our research, you know, to company's positivism,
Speaker 2: the ethical socialists. The ethicalness of it all is really
Speaker 2: where the vaccine and all of this bullshit starts. The
Speaker 2: final thing I want to say is that you know,
Speaker 2: about a week ago, I really had a Hall moment
Speaker 2: and that we're not really fighting the new world order.
Speaker 2: We're not really really really having to overcome something that
Speaker 2: seems unbeatable.
Speaker 4: All we have to do is.
Speaker 2: Expose this progressive movement as a human, man made construct,
Speaker 2: to put us all on a hamster wheel and show
Speaker 2: that this school of thought that everybody has right now
Speaker 2: is faulty. We've got one hundred years of hindsight to
Speaker 2: show it very clearly the errors of its ways. So
Speaker 2: it's really not an elite that we're trying to overthrow.
Speaker 2: It's the idea that they've presented into our society that
Speaker 2: progressivism is a natural, innate human thing that we're supposed
Speaker 2: to be doing, while it is actually a man made
Speaker 2: construct and.
Speaker 1: The anti science of the science is settled. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: means don't look at their mistakes and their frauds that
Speaker 1: brought you to the point where you believe what they're
Speaker 1: telling you now. And if we want to look at
Speaker 1: any type of weapon that global government uses, what is
Speaker 1: the World Health Organization pushing, what's the United Nations pushing,
Speaker 1: what's CDC, the ANAIH, it's all utilizing the medical the
Speaker 1: medical establishment to keep on popping with this mic. I
Speaker 1: wonder somebody jeck me up? But what do you call it? Yeah,
Speaker 1: So that is important to debunk their bullshit because it's
Speaker 1: taking us on a fast track to hell, and they're
Speaker 1: constantly stoking that fire. They did it in twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: they're about to do it again. Mark the words.
Speaker 2: You can see that they're I think ultimately, they're just
Speaker 2: trying to bring about the end times as they've thought
Speaker 2: the religious texts have always predicted.
Speaker 1: And which they made up in the nill in this period.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, and all of this, including climate change and
Speaker 2: all of this bullshit is made up. And anybody that
Speaker 2: doubts that just start looking into this. They've reclassified hurricanes
Speaker 2: and tornadoes and winter storms and winds and all kinds
Speaker 2: of things to fit their narrative so that they can say, oh,
Speaker 2: it's increasing every year. But I mean, look at the Maldives.
Speaker 2: They're putting new airports there. This is supposed to be
Speaker 2: one of the first casualties of climate change, which is
Speaker 2: actually global warming, you know, so the sea levels are
Speaker 2: not rising. This is all, you know, a phantasm put
Speaker 2: into our brains through the mainstream media that were at
Speaker 2: fault and all of this, and there is probably some
Speaker 2: truth to this, but the fact that there's.
Speaker 1: Media operations that do the majority of the polluting that
Speaker 1: they've taken responsibility.
Speaker 2: For, right, and this is like progressivism that actually gets
Speaker 2: thrown to the wayside, just like the five hundred million Arabs.
Speaker 2: We don't talk about that. We don't actually talk about
Speaker 2: the corporations that are physically dumping barrels of shit into
Speaker 2: rivers and creating islands of garbage in the middle of
Speaker 2: the Pacific. We don't ever address these things. And these
Speaker 2: are the real things that we would find agreement with
Speaker 2: with everybody, no matter what party affiliation you have.
Speaker 1: And then when people get sick and die, they point
Speaker 1: out pollution and call it it's a new virus. Take
Speaker 1: this shot. We can kill more of you.
Speaker 2: Because of our setting, because of our environment, not anything
Speaker 2: that we're doing, of course. Yeah, so.
Speaker 1: Just cause the viruses.
Speaker 2: Glad to be here. I'm always excited to be here
Speaker 2: and have these conversations with you. We're going to continue
Speaker 2: this journey. I hope more and more people come over
Speaker 2: here and watch these Wednesday mornings, have a coffee with us,
Speaker 2: join the conversation. Glad to have people paying attention over here.
Speaker 1: So it's called on Sunday. What time is it Pacific?
Speaker 2: Time for the Deep Share with Andy Rose is six
Speaker 2: pm Pacific, So that's yours in my timeline. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 2: so yeah, nine Pacific, so it gets started a little
Speaker 2: late in the East. But Andy's got a family and
Speaker 2: he's busy, and so I just make time. Yeah, and
Speaker 2: I also cross Paulina I advertise on his show for
Speaker 2: this because you know, these aren't the same. This is
Speaker 2: why I'm trying to keep them a little bit different.
Speaker 2: Because I've got multiple app news of research going on,
Speaker 2: and you know, Friday night, I'm on a radio broadcast
Speaker 2: this Friday with RBN. Talked about RBN. There's definitely some
Speaker 2: things that we can talk about privately, but they are
Speaker 2: allowing me to say all these things. And I've been
Speaker 2: on with my friend Lark in Texas and he's showing
Speaker 2: us communitarianism in this connection. And so now we're starting
Speaker 2: to find parallels between communication and communism when you look
Speaker 2: at communication comm right, this goes back to this homo
Speaker 2: economicus in this economic man. So look forward to all
Speaker 2: of that research because it's just going to totally blow
Speaker 2: your mind. I sat here in quiet solace for about
Speaker 2: half an hour when I uncovered this latest research, just
Speaker 2: to contemplate it.
Speaker 1: And it's gonna take me forever to scroll back up
Speaker 1: and telegram, but somebody sent me something about communitarianism. Phil
Speaker 1: did for you specifically to look at right, and so
Speaker 1: many people say so many things in the telegram group
Speaker 1: that it's way up here. So I didn't get a
Speaker 1: chance to get it over to you. But if I
Speaker 1: find the link, I'll send it over to you. It's
Speaker 1: a little video. I haven't even watched it myself, but
Speaker 1: I think there's like a peanut butter and jelly sandwich
Speaker 1: on the cover or something like this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so yeah, this is a PP and J. This
Speaker 2: is people connected with LARK. I've had conversations with these
Speaker 2: guys on the phone, and actually while we were having
Speaker 2: this podcast, they connected through my phone. Again. Communitarianism is
Speaker 2: a underappreciated aspect that parallels with all of this progressive movement,
Speaker 2: and we see it today in the technical advancements, efficiency preparedness,
Speaker 2: all of those things, the buying up a farm land,
Speaker 2: and I think that may be what we're getting into
Speaker 2: on the Friday broadcast. I'm not sure I might be
Speaker 2: speaking out a turn, but we didn't get to it
Speaker 2: the last time, so I'd imagine that we're going to
Speaker 2: show this fourteen minute video where they're showing east of
Speaker 2: San Francisco. They're just by up all of this farmland
Speaker 2: and creating fate like they're rich people, the elite are
Speaker 2: creating these utopias. Yep. Communitarianism very important to understand.
Speaker 1: And that's none of those things like Gates owns the
Speaker 1: majority of Arizona, right and even one not think. But
Speaker 1: there's irrigation. So once you understand irrigation, like you can
Speaker 1: grow anything anywhere. It's shitty soil, but whatever. And people
Speaker 1: are like, well, he's going to grow this crazy thing
Speaker 1: or it's going to be bugs, there's going to be
Speaker 1: this you know, this genetic and matifact. I go, what
Speaker 1: if it's to buy it, to do nothing with it
Speaker 1: because they're starring as a death they call it, they
Speaker 1: call rewilding, or they just let it overgrow. Well, look
Speaker 1: it's his property and he doesn't need to make money
Speaker 1: off it because he's doing just fine.
Speaker 2: Yeah, where do the alpha and betas go for vacation
Speaker 2: in a brave new world? But that, you know, same place,
Speaker 2: and what's there now? Nothing, It's just backwards. People still
Speaker 2: having babies, humans still giving having babies and eating food
Speaker 2: from the soil. It's all bizarre to the point of
Speaker 2: the alphas and the betas, the most the highest members
Speaker 2: of society go on vacation to look at these backwards
Speaker 2: races that are having babies by humans and eating food
Speaker 2: from the soil. So and that's in that area. So
Speaker 2: you know, Roosevelt also a major proponent of conservation. So
Speaker 2: what to make state parks, well to make state parks,
Speaker 2: but also for the government own that land. Right, this
Speaker 2: is what I'm saying. It's the same thing as Bill
Speaker 2: Gates buying up all this farmland. It's so that they
Speaker 2: just possess it and now they have to say as
Speaker 2: to what want they want to do with it. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's preserve your America.
Speaker 1: For you maintain the rights to everything properly. They can.
Speaker 1: They can. They can take over people's farmland if they
Speaker 1: say there's resources in it. Oh we did a geological study.
Speaker 1: What the fun you're doing without my land in the
Speaker 1: first place?
Speaker 4: Domain?
Speaker 2: Right, they can just come and take That's why I understand.
Speaker 1: You know, like if you go if you're deep diving,
Speaker 1: you have the money to go do deep driving, and
Speaker 1: you find treasure in a ship, or if you find
Speaker 1: something buried in your backyard, don't fucking tell the government
Speaker 1: about they take it. They don't give you any conversations.
Speaker 1: There's gold there, they take it, yeah, in the museum,
Speaker 1: and then they freaking melt down the rest.
Speaker 2: They're they're finding. There's stories about people finding Egyptian artifacts
Speaker 2: in the Grand Canyon and all of that being completely suppressed.
Speaker 2: Now that's just you know, I'm just.
Speaker 1: There's that there's there's like zero access certain places in there.
Speaker 2: But the Smithsonian would be the worst place that you
Speaker 2: could send anything that you find. Yeah, because that's Indiana
Speaker 2: Jones's big warehouse right where they take the ark of
Speaker 2: the Covenant and hide it. This is exactly what happens.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they will disappear you like a like a bag
Speaker 1: of giant dinosaur. You call it giant bones, right right exactly.
Speaker 1: Oh look, oh look I found some giant bones very
Speaker 1: called the Smithsonian. All right, man, Oh it was this one.
Speaker 1: Say I believe in man made climate change? You and engineering? Okay,
Speaker 1: and actually that's agreed.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a that's the right way to say it.
Speaker 2: Man made climate change, and you believe in it, right,
Speaker 2: I don't. At this point, I'm probably going to be
Speaker 2: more accurate than saying that I don't. And I don't
Speaker 2: deal with absolutes very often.
Speaker 1: But I believe, I believe what she's getting is creating,
Speaker 1: creating storms, creating desert because throughout and all that stuff
Speaker 1: like that type that type of climate change, like like
Speaker 1: terrain change.
Speaker 2: You know, they have been seating clouds since the first
Speaker 2: airplane was flown, right, It's the same thing as the television.
Speaker 2: They were developing it to indoctrinate you, not to entertain you.
Speaker 2: And you know they were cloud seating during the Vietnam
Speaker 2: War in the sixties to prevent transmit through the Hoch
Speaker 2: Human Trail and its operation pop by exactly. I mean,
Speaker 2: these only leftist television watchers don't understand all this. And
Speaker 2: I'll show them an article from the Navy from the
Speaker 2: fifties in which they admit and show all of the
Speaker 2: studies that they're doing. And these people still won't believe you.
Speaker 2: So what do you do? You just keep moving forward,
Speaker 2: keep pushing, keep planting.
Speaker 1: Seeds literally and figuratively.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, growing ourselves and growing food.
Speaker 1: This is the way we need to be and read
Speaker 1: the shit out of books. So yes, that guys, we
Speaker 1: are in Babylon Ford, thank you. Fourteen forty one on
Speaker 1: the way too. That's that's the number that we're at
Speaker 1: right now on our way to the computer fund.
Speaker 2: So oh wow, there you're cool right on?
Speaker 1: Yeah, and how much do you need? Well, I just
Speaker 1: repriced the GPU and it was up two hundred dollars
Speaker 1: and the last time I saw it, So I actually
Speaker 1: made the the funding goal from eighteen to two thousand
Speaker 1: just to cover so that once we have once once
Speaker 1: I say the goal is met, then I actually know
Speaker 1: that I have enough to get everything so right, So.
Speaker 2: Hey, everybody make quick work of that. Let's get him
Speaker 2: a new computer. It's all helps. You saw the issues
Speaker 2: that we were having at the beginning. I'm not sure
Speaker 2: if a new computer is going to help all of that,
Speaker 2: but it certainly won't hurt it. And the more efficient
Speaker 2: and the more clear we can be in transferring all
Speaker 2: of this information to you, the more effective we're going
Speaker 2: to be and the faster we're going to get to
Speaker 2: winning this bullshit.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, absolutely, So.
Speaker 2: Support Daniel all you can. You can support bulletproofpub dot
Speaker 2: com too. Just follow the white rabbit go to the bottom.
Speaker 2: I am I have a PayPal account. My wife made
Speaker 2: me a PayPal account, but I can't tell you anything
Speaker 2: about it, I think you got to go to Dwayne
Speaker 2: Hayes twenty eight at gmail dot com and.
Speaker 1: Yeah, put that in there and then it'll pop you
Speaker 1: up if if that's correct, let me go ahead and
Speaker 1: just do this real quick.
Speaker 2: So some of you may know the issues that we're
Speaker 2: having with the farm and so you know, in two
Speaker 2: weeks our harvest box ends and we've got some savings
Speaker 2: and we've been pretty good with our money. But if
Speaker 2: we really are serious about having this information continued, I'm
Speaker 2: not sure who's going to take over for me if
Speaker 2: I disappear. So we're hoping that you guys see the value. Yep,
Speaker 2: there you go and support us, And any support through
Speaker 2: there goes directly to the web designer, my close friend
Speaker 2: Jon Sole and his living trust, because he is going
Speaker 2: down that avenue of research into how can we actually
Speaker 2: step out of our modern day social contract and be
Speaker 2: sovereign or as free as we possibly can. He is
Speaker 2: looking into all of this living trust and transferring all
Speaker 2: of your identification to a living trust. So yeah, any
Speaker 2: support there for my friend Sledgehammer would be appreciated. And
Speaker 2: then you can find me at Dwayne Hayes twenty eight
Speaker 2: at gmail dot com. Yep, there you go, Jon Sole
Speaker 2: Living Trust. He is my partner in crime. He is
Speaker 2: the web designer. He's done us a huge favor and Yep,
Speaker 2: any support there helps an honest, hardworking family. I can
Speaker 2: vouch for that. I've met his family. They're wonderful and
Speaker 2: they have earned and deserve your your support, commendation, all
Speaker 2: of those things.
Speaker 1: And I will say this one last thing because it
Speaker 1: kind of gets gets me because I'm surprised that this
Speaker 1: is something that needs to be explained. This belong into
Speaker 1: the future of PayPal. Just because the word PayPal is
Speaker 1: mentioned doesn't mean that you need to have PayPal to
Speaker 1: use it. They're a credit card processing company. So when
Speaker 1: PayPal pops up, yes, you can use PayPal to pay
Speaker 1: PayPal fit fit, but you don't have to. You can
Speaker 1: use a credit card. And it's like on my site,
Speaker 1: I have PayPal handles, credit cards and PayPal payments, right,
Speaker 1: but how to actually add stripe to my to my
Speaker 1: website because people didn't comprehend that. So now now the
Speaker 1: stripe one shows that the pictures of the credit cards,
Speaker 1: now it rays all excited.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and it's probably best to walk people through show
Speaker 2: them that show them where to go, where to click,
Speaker 2: like you've just done, and yeah, that's cool man.
Speaker 1: Already next Wednesday, I was hopefully going to be back
Speaker 1: here after my trip to San Diego today, so I
Speaker 1: can do it tomorrow's show and I'll have doctor Glidden
Speaker 1: on and.
Speaker 2: Then, yes, I've been watching those. They're good.
Speaker 1: We'll get we'll get back into the swing of things.
Speaker 1: I had three days off welle, working through it, doing work,
Speaker 1: but I mean I was off of here, all right,
Speaker 1: And guys again once again, you know, you know you
Speaker 1: need to get on it. And the more information that
Speaker 1: I bring it to you about this whole lie of
Speaker 1: how disease even comes, You're going to be free from
Speaker 1: this idea of virus and this outside force. It comes
Speaker 1: from within. The bacteria create itself because of the environment
Speaker 1: within you, and you have full control of that. You're
Speaker 1: not getting poisoned, and if you are, you can fix
Speaker 1: that too. For the most part, you get into doctor
Speaker 1: Peter Glynnon's membership. It's in the description get it done.
Speaker 1: He's telling you how to keep yourself strong.
Speaker 2: All right, yep? Cool, So yeah, m hm