Speaker 1: Hello everybody, and welcome to another edition of The Cajun
Speaker 1: Night Live. I am your host the Cajun Night and
Speaker 1: tonight we're gonna start off talking about some more obscure topics,
Speaker 1: something from a couple of weeks ago that I wanted
Speaker 1: to bring up but just got sidetracked with other topics.
Speaker 1: We're gonna be talking a little bit about the Iranian situation.
Speaker 1: Trump just let out a large uh I want to say,
Speaker 1: a State of the Union address, but he addressed the
Speaker 1: nation to give an update on what he believes the
Speaker 1: situation is with Iron. We're gonna talk about that. Artemis
Speaker 1: two launched today, as a matter of fact, so I
Speaker 1: was wrong. I show enough thought that I was gonna
Speaker 1: get kicked down the road, there was gonna be some
Speaker 1: sort of a mechanical issue, and that it wasn't gonna happen.
Speaker 1: But they launched it. They absolutely did. So for the
Speaker 1: next ten days, we have some Americans and one canuck
Speaker 1: up there in the Great Beyond. We're gonna talk about
Speaker 1: all these things and more. And as it come to
Speaker 1: find out, I accidentally sent this to all members of
Speaker 1: the Cajun Night Patreon, not just the paid members, So
Speaker 1: it's possible we get some new faces in here this evening.
Speaker 1: I don't know, we'll see how it goes. But that's
Speaker 1: on me. When before we had before we started, I
Speaker 1: had to piss so bad. I was just kind of quick, look, lookick,
Speaker 1: they're trying to get everything ready to go, and that
Speaker 1: I kind of fat fingered that one. So that's on me.
Speaker 1: But it's okay. We're here, we're together, and we're gonna
Speaker 1: have our Wednesday night fireside chat if you will, and
Speaker 1: get it going over here. So for anybody who's listening
Speaker 1: to this on the following day, I do want to
Speaker 1: give the shameless plug please come check us out at
Speaker 1: the Cage and Night on Patreon link of the description below.
Speaker 1: There was only one tier for entry. There's just becoming
Speaker 1: its own information sharing group meet up every Wednesday night
Speaker 1: at nine pm Central, and uh yeah, I thoroughly enjoyed it,
Speaker 1: and I think all of them, all the retinue do
Speaker 1: as well. So yeah, I appreciate everybody who's already here,
Speaker 1: and for the ones that want to join, it's only
Speaker 1: a five dollars a month tier, just one tier. Let's
Speaker 1: do this. So let's start off with something that's a
Speaker 1: little out obscure, but also very important. The legend quote
Speaker 1: unquote legend of Caesar Chavez will never be the same
Speaker 1: after multiple rape allegations. So let's talk about it. So
Speaker 1: your boil, Sesar Chave's probably mispronouncing it. But also I've
Speaker 1: never particularly been fond of the guy, but especially now,
Speaker 1: he was, uh, you know, this upstanding righteous farm worker
Speaker 1: unionized like we need to you know, help the poor
Speaker 1: kind of guy, right, and he was clearly a Marxist,
Speaker 1: not by his own emission, but if you look at
Speaker 1: his ideologies and a lot of the rhetoric he was spitting,
Speaker 1: he was clearly a bit of a Marxist, and he
Speaker 1: was seen as a hero to some. However, there's more,
Speaker 1: uh that meets the eye. There's more than what meets
Speaker 1: the eye with this guy, because as come to find out,
Speaker 1: more and more and more and more people are coming
Speaker 1: out saying that no, he was also a violent rapist
Speaker 1: who not only raped women but children as well. For
Speaker 1: years and everybody up to hnder wraps, but now people
Speaker 1: are starting to come forward with it and they're able
Speaker 1: to verify their claims. So let's talk about it here.
Speaker 1: Caesar Chavez one of the founders of the United farm
Speaker 1: Workers who died in ninety three, led a movement for
Speaker 1: the rights and dignity of long abused, neglected, and exploited
Speaker 1: agricultural workforce. Through a series of marches, hunger strikes, boycotts,
Speaker 1: and union drives, Chavez and his movement succeeded in winning
Speaker 1: crucial labor in civil rights protections and advancing the cause
Speaker 1: and status of the Latino civil rights movement nationwide. He also,
Speaker 1: according to a new report from The New York Times,
Speaker 1: sexually harassed and assaulted women in his movement and sexually
Speaker 1: abused and rate the daughters of some of UFW's organizers
Speaker 1: when they were girls. The Times report provides extensive cooperation
Speaker 1: of allegations by two women, Anna Morguia and Deborah Rojas,
Speaker 1: both now sixty six, that they were repeatedly molested by
Speaker 1: Chavez more than fifty years ago. It's when they were adolescents,
Speaker 1: beginning when they were twelve and thirteen. The report also
Speaker 1: contains newly public allegations by Dolores Huerta, the renowned trade
Speaker 1: union activists and co founder of WFW or UfW brother
Speaker 1: that Chavez once pressured her to have sex with him
Speaker 1: on a work trip and then later raped her in
Speaker 1: the parked car. Encounters that Hooeva says led to pregnancies,
Speaker 1: which she strove to conceal before giving the resulting daughters
Speaker 1: a way to be raised by others. So come to
Speaker 1: find out, I know this weird one. This is crazy
Speaker 1: to say that Caesar Chavez was a raging piece of shit,
Speaker 1: But like who could have guessed it? But here we
Speaker 1: are he was indeed. Marguilla and Rojas, the women who
Speaker 1: say they were abused by Chavez as children, describe remarkably
Speaker 1: similar patterns of conduct by the union leader. The daughters
Speaker 1: of organizers. The girls have been raised to revere Chavez
Speaker 1: as a hero. Early in their adolescence, they were each
Speaker 1: summoned by Chavez to his office where he initiated sexual abuse.
Speaker 1: Both women say that the abuse use went on for
Speaker 1: several years while there were still children. Rojas says that
Speaker 1: when she was fifteen, Chaves arranged for her to travel
Speaker 1: with him for her from her home and Lapause to
Speaker 1: North La where she lived with her parents in a
Speaker 1: community devoted to Chavez's work and nearest compound, to Stockton, California,
Speaker 1: for a uf W March. While there, she says, Chavez
Speaker 1: took her to a motel and raped her more Merguia,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry if I mispronounced his name. Jaw I barely
Speaker 1: speak American English, says that Chaves sexually abused her of
Speaker 1: her did not include intercourse. In her account to The Times,
Speaker 1: Rojas described looking at Chavez's gun on the hotel nightstand
Speaker 1: table during the rape. He told her that he carried
Speaker 1: it for protection after receiving death threats. Allegations also emerged
Speaker 1: in the investigation from two women who both say that
Speaker 1: they were sexually harassed by Chavez as young women in
Speaker 1: the movement. As Marel de Lopez was just nineteen when Chavez,
Speaker 1: then sixty one, offered to advance her career in exchange
Speaker 1: for sex while the two were on a work trip.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that this is okay, but there's a
Speaker 1: lot more okay than a thirteen year old. A twelve
Speaker 1: year old, I'm pretty sure we can all agree with that.
Speaker 1: But still, it's using your position to leverage for sexual gratification,
Speaker 1: which is still fucking abhorrent. She rebuffed him and called
Speaker 1: her mother, Cynthia Bell, who was also a longtime Union
Speaker 1: organizer in Chavez's organization. On hearing her daughter story, Bell
Speaker 1: shared her own account of having been sexually harassed by
Speaker 1: Chavez when she was in her early twenties. So it's
Speaker 1: a long standing years and year's worth of abuse by
Speaker 1: this dumbass. The breadth and consistency of these accounts of
Speaker 1: sexual misconduct by Chavez, provided by five different women to
Speaker 1: The Times, all of whom knew the union leader through
Speaker 1: his activist work, suggests a long term pattern of conduct
Speaker 1: by Chavez and raised the possibility that other accusers may
Speaker 1: come forward in the future. The Times also reviewed a
Speaker 1: letter that Rojas sent to Chavez and seventy four at
Speaker 1: the age of thirteen. By that point, he had been
Speaker 1: abusing her for several months. In the letter, which was
Speaker 1: written on children's stationary in a bubbly, girlish hand, Rojas
Speaker 1: alternates between updates on her childhood friendships, saying I might
Speaker 1: go roller skating next Friday, and bashful childlike allusions to sexuality.
Speaker 1: I'm really glad I got to see you and spend
Speaker 1: time with you, she writes, Well, not like that. I
Speaker 1: think of you all the time. Do you think of me?
Speaker 1: Thirteen years old? Writing to a sixty year old I'm
Speaker 1: just I'm throwing it out, y'all. The letter is a
Speaker 1: disturbing document of the mind of a child who has
Speaker 1: been told that what is being done to her is love.
Speaker 1: He did it grooming very well. He did his grooming
Speaker 1: very well. Ross told the Times he should get an
Speaker 1: Academy award for all he did. She and Morguilla both
Speaker 1: trace subsequent mental health struggles to their experiences of childhood
Speaker 1: sexual abuse at child as his hands, with Rojas later
Speaker 1: struggling with drugs and alcohol and Morguilla attempting suicide multiple
Speaker 1: times in her adolescence. Yeah, you'll absolutely see that with
Speaker 1: children that have been abused in this way. Rojas's childhood
Speaker 1: letter to Chavez alluding to her abuse has been freely
Speaker 1: available in Chavez's personal archives at Wayne State University for decades,
Speaker 1: but then Rumors of chaves A sexual behavior have also
Speaker 1: been swirling for years. Though the uf W champion sexual
Speaker 1: abstinence and respectability, interestingly enough, and long opposed abortion and contraception,
Speaker 1: Chavez himself has long been known to have carried on
Speaker 1: multiple extramarital affairs, many of them with women in the movement.
Speaker 1: This much has already been documented in biographies of Chavez.
Speaker 1: In addition to the eight children he had with his wife,
Speaker 1: he fathered at least four others by other women, including
Speaker 1: two he fathered via non consensual encounters with Wherta. That's
Speaker 1: the other one that claimed that she got pregnant with
Speaker 1: him and had to give them up for adoption. So
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm just saying, holy fuck, right. But those
Speaker 1: who were close to Chavez or who've valued the las
Speaker 1: legacy of the W or the UfW got keep sucking
Speaker 1: that up, have long been protective of Chavez's legacy and
Speaker 1: have alleged discouraged or allegedly discouraged women victimized by him
Speaker 1: for speaking out. Huerta, who will turn ninety six in April,
Speaker 1: describes her long time reluctance to come forward about Chavez
Speaker 1: to The Times as a mixture of shock and various
Speaker 1: fears of alienation and disbelief, a combination that will be
Speaker 1: familiar to survivors. Huerta said she chose not to report
Speaker 1: the assault to the police because of their hostility toward
Speaker 1: the movement, and she feared that no one within the
Speaker 1: Union would believe her, which I understand that completely Anyway,
Speaker 1: we pretty much get the point here for anybody who
Speaker 1: may have thought that, you know, Caesar Chavez was like
Speaker 1: a good dude. Yeah, again, nothing could be further from
Speaker 1: the truth. We have a quick clip from the news
Speaker 1: ABC that's going to talk about this as well. Again,
Speaker 1: this came out like two weeks ago. I should have
Speaker 1: brought this up last week and the week before, but
Speaker 1: we had other things that we were talking about. So anyway,
Speaker 1: it's worth the mention.
Speaker 2: Let's go with the disturbing allegations of abuse merging against
Speaker 2: the late civil rights icon Caesar Chavez. The woman who
Speaker 2: was at his side for decades now coming forward. Here's
Speaker 2: John Conyodis.
Speaker 3: For decades, the late Caesar Chaves has been a civil
Speaker 3: rights icon, a champion of farm workers, and hero to
Speaker 3: millions of Latinos.
Speaker 1: We're not going to give up. We're in too far
Speaker 1: to give up.
Speaker 3: But tonight that legacy shattered after an explosive investigation by
Speaker 3: The New York Times detailing allegations Chavez groomed and sexually
Speaker 3: abused girls who worked in the farm workers movement. Anna
Speaker 3: Murgilla telling the New York Times she was thirteen years
Speaker 3: old when Caesar Chavis started to sexually abuse her. Debra Rojas,
Speaker 3: telling the Times she was raped by Chavez when she
Speaker 3: was fifteen, and in a shocking accusation, the lords Erta
Speaker 3: who co founded the United farm Workers' Union with Caesar Chaves,
Speaker 3: is breaking her silence.
Speaker 1: After sixty years.
Speaker 3: Saying she was pressured into having sex with Chavez in
Speaker 3: her tour ladies and was later raped by him, saying
Speaker 3: I was forced against my will. She says two children
Speaker 3: were born from those assaults and were adopted. Chavis has
Speaker 3: been honored with murals, schools, and streets named after him
Speaker 3: an annual Caesar Chaves Day celebrations, but tonight the United
Speaker 3: farm Workers say they will not participate in this month's celebrations,
Speaker 3: saying the allegations that very young women or girls may
Speaker 3: have been victimized are crushing and at Fresno State in California, tonight,
Speaker 3: this stark image the statue of Caesar Chaves now covered
Speaker 3: in black. Tonight, both the union and the families are
Speaker 3: expressing shock and concern for the victims.
Speaker 1: The lord is Wertha, now ninety five.
Speaker 3: Years old, says she only recently learned about the other women,
Speaker 3: and she says she's speaking out now because the knowledge
Speaker 3: that Chaves hurt young girls sickens her.
Speaker 1: Agreed. One thousand son agreed, So I'm worth bringing up
Speaker 1: the whole Caesar Chabas conversation. Now on to some comments,
Speaker 1: help you handle it?
Speaker 4: Where to hold on?
Speaker 1: One second? That there was a commercial that just parted
Speaker 1: playing out of nowhere?
Speaker 4: Say again, Yeah, I just I just wanted to comment.
Speaker 4: I don't think I completely believe where to hear. I
Speaker 4: think she probably saw it as uh kind of liberation,
Speaker 4: liberating experience at the time, and now sixty years later,
Speaker 4: she's making it out to be totally different. So she
Speaker 4: claims that she only had two encounters with him and
Speaker 4: both resulted in children, and one thing all the press
Speaker 4: leaves out she had four kids with his brother. She
Speaker 4: worked with him until he died, and praised him on
Speaker 4: multiple occasions decades after he died and never came forward
Speaker 4: during the me too era, And you know, now he's
Speaker 4: dead and all his friends are dead, pretty much like
Speaker 4: there's no there's no defense of him anymore. So I
Speaker 4: hate Chivas anyway. He basically a Marxist. Basically, Yeah, I
Speaker 4: don't think this whole thing is really fair. And you
Speaker 4: can't defend himself here, and I think these women are exaggerating.
Speaker 1: Even if that one is an exaggeration because like you said,
Speaker 1: she did in fact have kids with his brother. Cool,
Speaker 1: all right, that doesn't negate the twelve year old and
Speaker 1: the thirteen year old, and that doesn't negate the other
Speaker 1: women that also suffered at his hands, or him trying
Speaker 1: to use his position to say, oh, if you you know,
Speaker 1: if we fuck, then I'll help you advance your career
Speaker 1: in this and like that. These things can't be that.
Speaker 1: There's no way I'm not going to try to, like
Speaker 1: victim blame a thirteen year old like that.
Speaker 4: That's crazy, Okay, assuming the accusation is accurate. You know,
Speaker 4: he might be guilty of that, or he might not.
Speaker 4: He's not around to defend himself. I just don't know.
Speaker 4: He may be guilty. I just don't know.
Speaker 1: Yeah now, But like you said, I'm not a huge
Speaker 1: fan of him. Honestly, I think that Marxism is the
Speaker 1: second most evil ideology that has ever been presented to
Speaker 1: the world, and him being Yeah, by his own emission,
Speaker 1: he's not a Marxist, but if you look at his rhetoric,
Speaker 1: it was pretty much straight out of the Communist manifesto.
Speaker 1: So like, whatever you want to call it, learning this
Speaker 1: about him, it pretty much just it was like it
Speaker 1: wasn't even another nail in the coffin for me, but
Speaker 1: it was. Yeah, the fact that this is being brought
Speaker 1: up again. I should have brought it up two weeks ago,
Speaker 1: but we had other shit that we were talking about.
Speaker 1: But anyway, Sam, your hand was up, it's still up.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you wanted to add in or
Speaker 1: if that was for something else earlier.
Speaker 5: Yeah, first off, I will now, this is the first
Speaker 5: time I'm ever heard hitting of this guy really, you know, Yeah, Okay,
Speaker 5: I would not surprise me. Just the fact that if
Speaker 5: he did this, it would not surprise.
Speaker 6: Me some people.
Speaker 1: Some people attribute him similarly to like the Martin Luther
Speaker 1: King Junior of the Latino community. Now I don't necessarily
Speaker 1: think that's a true, fair one to one comparison, but
Speaker 1: there are those that try to make the comparison of
Speaker 1: the two.
Speaker 6: So he was also fucking nice too.
Speaker 1: No, but to that point, right, Martin Luther King Junior
Speaker 1: was also a bit of a Marxist. Also did some wild, foul,
Speaker 1: underhanded shit behind closed doors, like all the stuff he.
Speaker 5: Went to sample like full blown communist thing.
Speaker 6: But that's needed handle there.
Speaker 5: If he is, If he is, if he did, wait
Speaker 5: for him and everything, I'm I'm happy he's dead.
Speaker 6: I hope he's burning in hail.
Speaker 1: Yoh oh he's a Marxist, dude, I guarantee he is.
Speaker 5: Oh no, if he since he's the Marxist, he's getting
Speaker 5: the gettld Hitler treat and he's getting a pineapple up
Speaker 5: at the s.
Speaker 1: He's getting a style treatment.
Speaker 6: Oh no, so a sand paper deal. THO got you?
Speaker 5: But yeah no, it's just what like coachually, don't they
Speaker 5: see that there? Women like their females like full blown women,
Speaker 5: like when they have their KINSI like culturally the man
Speaker 5: at all because if you fuck a child, IPUs, you
Speaker 5: fuck a child, and it is proven one without a doubt.
Speaker 6: I believe he should be executed by seeing in there.
Speaker 1: Even still like a kin sannella happens when they're fifteen.
Speaker 1: If I'm not mistaken, and like cool, I got you.
Speaker 1: But that's more of like a it's very similar to
Speaker 1: a Jewish like bar Mitzvah at thirteen or a bot Mitzvah.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean that they don't. That doesn't mean that
Speaker 1: they're okay to like get married and shit, that's basically
Speaker 1: a thing for them to step into more of a
Speaker 1: an adult role and leave childhood things behind. And like,
Speaker 1: I can understand that maybe traditionally back in the day,
Speaker 1: when a Jewish boy became thirteen, he might enter the
Speaker 1: workforce or something. I don't know, but it's not it's
Speaker 1: not the same, you know. And the the Kinsigneta thing.
Speaker 1: That's kind of like how in the white culture we
Speaker 1: had like a sweet sixteen if that makes sense.
Speaker 5: See, I didn't think there was that good. I thought
Speaker 5: it was one of those things that I didn't like.
Speaker 5: Twente f over and everything.
Speaker 6: Knock gonna lie. I'm not as mold, I'm not as
Speaker 6: cultured as I wish to be, but I'm trying.
Speaker 5: I mean, hell, I'm I'm learning more about the Jewish
Speaker 5: culture every damn day when I talk to the vampire.
Speaker 6: But I love your voice, but no, it's I just
Speaker 6: think that.
Speaker 1: I was just thinking, where the hell is Royce? But
Speaker 1: I forgot it's Passover?
Speaker 5: Yeah, it does wait Passover, that's the is it.
Speaker 1: That's the Angel of Death went over Egypt. And if
Speaker 1: you had lambs blood over your door, then he would
Speaker 1: pass you over, which and he didn't slaughter a fresh
Speaker 1: born exactly. That's what they celebrate passover to this day
Speaker 1: today is Passover.
Speaker 5: But I thought, pat, oh wait, so I'm getting passed
Speaker 5: over on Good Friday?
Speaker 1: Mixed up? My bad? Yeah, no, they they don't care
Speaker 1: about Good Friday like at all. Although although when we're
Speaker 1: talking about the timeframe of which Jesus was crucified, he
Speaker 1: went to Jerusalem for the Passover feast, which is how
Speaker 1: that used to be done, so like it was during
Speaker 1: this time of year, yes, exactly, which that that last
Speaker 1: supper was a Passover feast, so like, yeah, it's all,
Speaker 1: it's all a part of the but it's very separate.
Speaker 5: Well that man said happy used to my good brother.
Speaker 5: But it's just weird, Like even Jesus said it. If
Speaker 5: anyone shall haul on these little ones and bring them
Speaker 5: into sin, it is better for you to tie a
Speaker 5: millstone around your neck and throw yourself into the sink
Speaker 5: and go. Man, if you fuck that little child, you
Speaker 5: have a better chance of surviving browning than you already
Speaker 5: get in mercy.
Speaker 1: So yeah, which that's been a thing since the beginning
Speaker 1: of time. Honestly, the Roman legionaries were also known for
Speaker 1: being extremely cruel to the people that they would come
Speaker 1: in contact with. So I mean it's.
Speaker 5: They look at the Athenians like they were colloquially known
Speaker 5: as the boy lovers.
Speaker 1: Not even that Spartans were known for this too, Like
Speaker 1: let's let's if we're gonna keep it, you know, all
Speaker 1: above board here then like, yes, throughout the course of
Speaker 1: human history, rape culture has been a very prevalent thing.
Speaker 1: So I'm not I'm not saying that to minimize how
Speaker 1: serious and how horrible it is. I'm saying it like, yeah, this.
Speaker 5: Is okay talking about current geopolitical things. Over in Britain,
Speaker 5: there are a bunch of packy rape gangs going around.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: To the point, over in Spain, a woman just I say,
Speaker 5: a woman, she's a young a young woman. Well she
Speaker 5: was she was a she was gang Yeah, she was
Speaker 5: gang raped and everything by fifteen immigrant miners whose the
Speaker 5: state took her from her parents or whatever. Don't know
Speaker 5: why that, but her and her dad was trying to
Speaker 5: issue and everything because she wanted to be euthanized after
Speaker 5: because she just couldn't live with the pain and everything,
Speaker 5: which my heart goes out to her and a family.
Speaker 5: Well apparently right, she did a whole video like in
Speaker 5: four days I will be euthanized. So there's only four
Speaker 5: days left. Well, it turns out on like the last day,
Speaker 5: she decided like no, I changed my mind.
Speaker 6: I want to live. They can. They went ahead and
Speaker 6: euthanized her because she was an organ donor.
Speaker 1: I haven't heard that one.
Speaker 6: This just happened in sane, like.
Speaker 1: A few weeks ago, a few years ago.
Speaker 6: A couple of days ago, a.
Speaker 1: Few days ago.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, I haven't hooked.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 5: And her rapists, all of those little sons of bitches.
Speaker 6: Yeah, none of them are in trouble.
Speaker 1: Of course not. They're migrants. It's their culture or something, the.
Speaker 6: God damn culture.
Speaker 5: If they're if they are a minute society of that,
Speaker 5: they should not be bleeding.
Speaker 6: We talked about this, hanging him fucked.
Speaker 1: We talked about this last night. It's the Muslims need
Speaker 1: to stay in the Arab world, not the most excuse me,
Speaker 1: the Islamists need to stay in the Middle East. Their
Speaker 1: culture does not gel with with any other culture pretty
Speaker 1: much on Earth. Like I'm just saying, anyway, Tony, what
Speaker 1: you got to do.
Speaker 4: One more thing. Regarding the claims of child sexual abuse
Speaker 4: by says our Chad is one of the very few
Speaker 4: key details in the two claims of child sex abuse
Speaker 4: from the early seventies include the use of a yoga mat.
Speaker 4: But yoga mats weren't even a thing in the seventies.
Speaker 4: Nobody had ever heard of one. That wasn't a thing
Speaker 4: until ten or twenty years later, So I'm pretty doubtful
Speaker 4: of those claims as well. Now, he did cheat on
Speaker 4: his wife, He did have at least four kids with
Speaker 4: other women, including eight kids with his wife. But you know,
Speaker 4: there's a reason for statute to limitations on accusations like
Speaker 4: this if decades and decades go by and the person's
Speaker 4: dead can't defend himself. Yeah, there's just And there's no
Speaker 4: other evidence except the letter that you read. You know
Speaker 4: that was a letter from her to him.
Speaker 1: Wait, what do you mean? What do you mean? Yoga
Speaker 1: mats weren't around. Alistair Crowley brought yoga to the Americas
Speaker 1: in the twenties and thirties, when did what are you
Speaker 1: talking about?
Speaker 4: Technically, you know, you might be able to find one somewhere,
Speaker 4: But in the seventies, yoga just wasn't really a thing.
Speaker 1: I thought it was gaining popularity at that time. Honest,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'm not like an expert on the
Speaker 1: history of it or where like a traditional yoga matt
Speaker 1: became more prevalently used rather than like just your carpet ors.
Speaker 1: I don't know, but okay.
Speaker 5: I just thought up yoga mats started a gains action
Speaker 5: only as nineteen eighty two in America.
Speaker 1: These allegations happened allegedly in the seventies.
Speaker 4: In the seventies, so you know, it's possible, It's not
Speaker 4: impossible that a yoga mat would exist. It's the kind
Speaker 4: of thing that you know, somebody trying to reconstruct a
Speaker 4: story that might have happened, and maybe it wasn't even
Speaker 4: a yoga matt. But you know, these are the kinds
Speaker 4: of things lawyers will definitely rightfully pick on, like are
Speaker 4: you sure this happened? Well, there's nothing legally limitations reason.
Speaker 1: Well, there's nothing legally that can happen at this point anyway,
Speaker 1: he's dead. But like, I am happy that this is
Speaker 1: coming forward so that his legacy is tarnished forever and
Speaker 1: that people will stop glorifying him as some sort of
Speaker 1: a you know, uh, unreproachable hero. Same with Martin Luther King.
Speaker 1: For the record, I'm very happy that the truth about
Speaker 1: him came out. And it's like I hate him and
Speaker 1: I don't necessarily hate Chavez. I think that they were
Speaker 1: both very, very flawed individuals and people need to stop
Speaker 1: putting a Messiah complex on them. That That's all I'm saying.
Speaker 1: So I'm glad. I'm glad that the ship came out
Speaker 1: about m Okay, I'm glad the ship came out about
Speaker 1: uh Chavez. And if and when things get brought out
Speaker 1: confirmed about Donald Trump, I'll be very happy when people
Speaker 1: will stop putting the side complex on him too. And Obama.
Speaker 1: I'm just throwing it out like there's and I'm not saying,
Speaker 1: like you know, we should you shouldn't put your faith
Speaker 1: and trust into any person because everybody's flawed, everybody's human,
Speaker 1: everybody's got their skeletons in their closet. And I understand that,
Speaker 1: but I can't abide by this level of skeletons in
Speaker 1: the closet. Honestly, you know, I understand that I'm also imperfect.
Speaker 1: I got my shit with me. I got no room
Speaker 1: to judge, nor am I trying to But I think
Speaker 1: we can all regardless of what you got, agree that
Speaker 1: pedophilic behavior there is no coming back from. I don't
Speaker 1: know that's the least ry stand with it. But anyway,
Speaker 1: as we were talking about Europe, and as we're talking
Speaker 1: about some of the migrant issues there, this is another
Speaker 1: kind of a thing that you've probably seen recently. The
Speaker 1: EU is about to enact a cash ban. Right. This
Speaker 1: has been going viral all over. It's kind of misleading
Speaker 1: in the way that it has been worded all over
Speaker 1: the social media, is all over the youtubes. I've even
Speaker 1: seen some news anchors that are giving some very misleading
Speaker 1: things with it. But it could get to the level
Speaker 1: of what they're talking about soon. Here's what's actually going
Speaker 1: on with this cash ban that's going on right So
Speaker 1: online post claiming the cash payments over ten thousand euros,
Speaker 1: which is about eleven thousand, six hundred dollars, have been
Speaker 1: outlawed in the EU's latest anti money laundering regulations, and
Speaker 1: this has gone viral despite being misleading. In reality, the package,
Speaker 1: which is due to take effect in July of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty seven, imposes an EU wide cap of ten thousand
Speaker 1: dollars on cash payments made only two businesses in professional transactions.
Speaker 1: This is part of an EU bid to combat money laundering.
Speaker 1: Private transactions remain, however, unaffected by this rule. So again,
Speaker 1: the way that they've been saying is like they're about
Speaker 1: to take away all the cash in Europe. No, they're
Speaker 1: making it to wear a business can't make a business
Speaker 1: transaction of over ten thousand dollars with actual cash, wire
Speaker 1: transfers all day, all day, swiping a company credit card,
Speaker 1: that's fine, all the shit actual Like I was gonna
Speaker 1: say green money, but the Euro isn't exactly green. But
Speaker 1: you see want to saying paper money, actual like hard dollars.
Speaker 1: That's not going to be able to happen business to
Speaker 1: business over ten k That's all this is. So it's
Speaker 1: like the move will not criminalize buying a car and
Speaker 1: cash as claimed, but it is part of the EUS
Speaker 1: attempt to close loopholes exploited by laundering money or for
Speaker 1: laundering money. While paying over ten thousand dollars to a
Speaker 1: business could be illegal. From twenty twenty seven, Europeans can
Speaker 1: still hold as much cash as they wish and use
Speaker 1: it in daily transactions. Posts have also claimed that the
Speaker 1: EU's new anti money laundering laws will require identification for
Speaker 1: all crypto transactions. These posts are likely referring to travel
Speaker 1: rule requirements that apply to crypto asset service providers licensed
Speaker 1: in the EU, which are regularly required to exchange details
Speaker 1: with each other again to combat money laundering. Self custody
Speaker 1: wallets will likely not be affected by these laws when
Speaker 1: interacting with each other. The new framework does not set
Speaker 1: out to ban self custody wallets or payments in cash. Nevertheless,
Speaker 1: it does not indicate further tightening of traceability requirements that
Speaker 1: fuel long running debates on privacy. So all right, here's
Speaker 1: where I'm at with this. And maybe it's because I'm
Speaker 1: a full blown capitalist at heart. I don't like any
Speaker 1: kind of regulations on money or cash or business. And
Speaker 1: I know, fine, fine, and I'm not saying like, yes,
Speaker 1: monopoly law should be in place, I agree with that,
Speaker 1: but as far as money transactions for business purposes, I
Speaker 1: don't like it. I've heard a couple of people make
Speaker 1: the and this is where it was, like the misleading posts.
Speaker 1: They're saying that basically, you know, let's say you get
Speaker 1: on I don't even know, if they have Craigslist in
Speaker 1: Europe or whatever, if they don't have Craigslist the Craigslist
Speaker 1: equivalent in Europe, right or whatever. And you see a
Speaker 1: posting for like fifteen K for some car and you
Speaker 1: tell them, look, I got cash, I'll bring it to you.
Speaker 1: That's still going to be good to go. There's no
Speaker 1: infringements on this. However, this could be hypothetically where it starts.
Speaker 1: And I know that I bring up magazine capacity and
Speaker 1: firearms in America a lot, but it is a it's
Speaker 1: a you could trace it. Basically, you could track how
Speaker 1: it went to see where we got to now in
Speaker 1: certain states. It started off with okay, well you don't
Speaker 1: need a fully automatic weapon. Okay, well you also don't
Speaker 1: need a weapon with one hundred round magazines. Why do
Speaker 1: you need thirty magazines? Well, honestly, why do you even
Speaker 1: need ten rounds in a magazine? You need five rounds
Speaker 1: is more than enough. And that's where they're at now,
Speaker 1: and it's going down the list to where that's eventually
Speaker 1: going to go into. Well, why do you even need
Speaker 1: that caliber, Why do you even need this type of weapon?
Speaker 1: Why do you need this? Why do you need this?
Speaker 1: And it's going to get to where we can't have
Speaker 1: weapons at all. Okay, that's that's the goal of a
Speaker 1: certain political ideology. Certain states fight back against that, certain
Speaker 1: states lean into it. Neither here nor there, and I
Speaker 1: don't I don't have proof and facts to say that
Speaker 1: this is clearly what's gonna happen in Europe. What I
Speaker 1: am saying is that cash is going to be obsolete
Speaker 1: sooner rather than later. And that's not a hot take.
Speaker 1: Everybody can look and realize most of us don't have
Speaker 1: a whole lot of cash in our wallets right now.
Speaker 1: We have our money in our bank accounts, associated with
Speaker 1: a little plastic card or through our phones, and we
Speaker 1: could tap to pay in all these things. These days,
Speaker 1: cash is going obsolete, not just in America and a
Speaker 1: lot of the First World countries, a lot of Europe.
Speaker 1: So could this hypothetically lead to where, okay, business to
Speaker 1: business can't make a ten dollars then ten thousand dollars
Speaker 1: or more cash payment, you could do it over wire. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: now we're gonna make it to where just because the
Speaker 1: money laundering. There's so much money laundering going I mean,
Speaker 1: we five thousand dollars cash is now the new thing.
Speaker 1: You know what? Fuck it? No business can make any
Speaker 1: business to business transaction with cash. Well, honestly, why does
Speaker 1: a human being need to be walking around with twenty
Speaker 1: K in their pocket? That's dangerous? What did they get
Speaker 1: robbed for it? This? And this? Why would you do
Speaker 1: away with cash altogether? I'm not saying that it's a
Speaker 1: guarantee that it's going to go that route, but I
Speaker 1: can absolutely see the lines on the chalk here, the
Speaker 1: chalk on the ground to say they are trying to
Speaker 1: force cash to become an obsolete method of payment. And
Speaker 1: I could envision a world where this is step one
Speaker 1: of the process. That's all I'm saying. I could be wrong.
Speaker 1: I hope I'm wrong, but I guess we'll just have
Speaker 1: to see how that shakes out. Now, off to a
Speaker 1: kind of obscure topic here. I thought this was weird.
Speaker 1: Pit vipers, flying snake and get goos among new species
Speaker 1: uncovered in Cambodian caves. We have flying fucking snakes now, y'all,
Speaker 1: which I have heard of a flaring adder before, which
Speaker 1: it doesn't fly, It kind of flattens its body and
Speaker 1: glides from tree to tree. However, we do have a
Speaker 1: new species uncovered in the Cambodian caves. This is it.
Speaker 1: This is a flying snake. You're seeing this with your eyeballs.
Speaker 1: Shit's fucking wild.
Speaker 6: Looking Cambodian dragons.
Speaker 1: Fucking maybe, fucking maybe, dude, look at this thing.
Speaker 5: They ain't wings the Asian dragons and gabbings only the
Speaker 5: European dragons were the ones with the full legs and
Speaker 5: rains that I know an Asian dragon.
Speaker 6: Want to see that, goddamn time.
Speaker 1: So this is the flying snake. It's let's read more
Speaker 1: about it. It's wild. Cambodia is largely unexplored. Limestone caves
Speaker 1: stretched for thousands of miles in our home to countless
Speaker 1: undiscovered species and hosts unique ecosystem with creatures found nowhere
Speaker 1: else on Earth. Now, a new survey of caves in
Speaker 1: the northwestern province of bats Bang Batam Bang Oh, Jesus Christ,
Speaker 1: the jokes right themselves bottom bang bottom Bang botta Boom
Speaker 1: has uncovered a range of species that are now new
Speaker 1: to science, including a turquoise pit viper, a flying snake,
Speaker 1: several geckos, two microsnails, and two millipedes. So the viper
Speaker 1: and three of the newly discovered get go species are
Speaker 1: still being formally named and characterized. The other finds have
Speaker 1: been officially recognized over the course of the biodiversity survey,
Speaker 1: which explored sixty four caves across ten hills between November
Speaker 1: twenty twenty three and July twenty twenty five and was
Speaker 1: published in a report Monday. So they're not even done
Speaker 1: documenting the stuff that they found over a two year
Speaker 1: survey over ten hills that had sixty four caves in it,
Speaker 1: and they have hundreds of miles of this shit to go.
Speaker 1: But all right, Each hill and cave in Cambodia's Rocky
Speaker 1: Kars landscape, a term for landscape created when rocks breakdown,
Speaker 1: forming large cave spring, sinking streams and sinkholes, is isolated
Speaker 1: from the others. Each performs as its own individual island
Speaker 1: laboratory of evolution, holding numerous distinct life forms and have
Speaker 1: adapted in their niche habitat. According to the UK based
Speaker 1: controversion charity Fauna and Flora, which led the survey along
Speaker 1: with the Cambodia's Ministry of Environmental Environment and field experts
Speaker 1: think of it as their own vignet of biodiversity, where
Speaker 1: nature is performing the same experiment over and over again independently.
Speaker 1: Evolutionary biologist Lee Grismer, professor of biology at least Las
Speaker 1: Sierra University in California, who supported the survey team, said
Speaker 1: in a statement, we go to these separate places and
Speaker 1: analyze the DNA of species and we see how the
Speaker 1: experiment has run. Some look alike, some look different, and
Speaker 1: by now analyzing this we can get an idea of
Speaker 1: what the driving forces are behind the way they evolve.
Speaker 1: For instance, while researchers identified one species of the stripe
Speaker 1: camping poi, bent toad, gecko, Jesus, they're just making up
Speaker 1: names at this point named Oh God, I'm gonna try
Speaker 1: to get this right, y'all. I'm sorry, I don't speak Latin,
Speaker 1: zir to deck to lists, camping poi poiinis. Sure. During
Speaker 1: fuel work in twenty twenty four, they found four different
Speaker 1: populations evolving in different ways. If we are truly going
Speaker 1: to conserve the biodiversity on this planet, we need to
Speaker 1: understand what is there. We can't protect something if we
Speaker 1: don't know it exists, which I mean, okay, hot takes.
Speaker 1: Globally threatened species such as the Sunda pagolan green pea fowl,
Speaker 1: long tailed macaque, and northern pigtailed macaque. We're also found
Speaker 1: in the landscape during the latest Servi Wow, so only
Speaker 1: scratch the surface here. Conservation biologists Pablo Sonovas led the
Speaker 1: Fauna and Flora team in Cambodia, working with local researchers
Speaker 1: to get an idea of the terrain during the day
Speaker 1: and the fun part look for creatures such as snakes
Speaker 1: and geckos at night, when they are most active and
Speaker 1: when they come out of hiding. He told CNN. The
Speaker 1: team would head out after sunset spend hours traversing sharp,
Speaker 1: rocky terrain with torches, looking around every crevice, looking around
Speaker 1: caves in the landscape, rocks, branches, vegetation, really everywhere. It
Speaker 1: was kind of nice, kind of a nice search party,
Speaker 1: said Sonovas, who is now a senior program manager at
Speaker 1: the charity. Some caves in the region hold up to
Speaker 1: one million bats, although the research team did not enter
Speaker 1: caves with large bat colonies due to health concerns. According
Speaker 1: to the report, Yeah, I would bet so. Kars landscape
Speaker 1: makes up nine percent of Cambodia's land area at twenty
Speaker 1: thousand square kilometers, which is a little over seventy seven
Speaker 1: one hundred square miles set the report, which outlined that
Speaker 1: a large portion of this is still unknown to science.
Speaker 1: Fourteen caves that had not previously been surveyed were registered
Speaker 1: on the Karst Hill in the Banan district of the
Speaker 1: Batambang Province. There is more exploration to be done, said
Speaker 1: so Novus, and saying that they have only scratched the
Speaker 1: surface in terms of biodiversity that is waiting to be
Speaker 1: discovered in the ecosystems of the wider landscape of Cambodia.
Speaker 1: As well as hosting a range of species, many of
Speaker 1: the caves are used as shrines or for meditation and
Speaker 1: other rituals, and are visited by tourists pilgrims, according to
Speaker 1: the report. Even so, karst habitats are under threat from
Speaker 1: poorly planned extraction for cement, as well as over tourism,
Speaker 1: wildlife hunting, logging, and wildfires. There is growing demand for cement,
Speaker 1: and karst limestone is useful for making cement and cars
Speaker 1: provides a very important raw material. Okay, but obviously if
Speaker 1: you destroy an area where certain species live in those
Speaker 1: species don't live anywhere else, then you would automatically potentially
Speaker 1: lead to the extinction of a species in some cases
Speaker 1: of species that haven't been described yet. So we are
Speaker 1: working with the government to ensure that these important areas
Speaker 1: are being protected. He added that there are ongoing discussions
Speaker 1: regarding giving this area some sort of protective status so
Speaker 1: they can be preserved into the future. Wow. So there
Speaker 1: it is, y'all. We have two different types. We have
Speaker 1: a pit viper, we got geckos. We got a flying snakes.
Speaker 1: That's a whole thing. Let me see that this shows
Speaker 1: more pictures. They do not Yeah, they do hold on.
Speaker 1: So that's one of them. That's them on the team
Speaker 1: looking at a rock. These are one of these. I
Speaker 1: guess bent towed geckos. I guess is Oh is that
Speaker 1: the flying snake? I don't know. That's a reticulated python. Okay, Okay,
Speaker 1: that's not it. There's another type of gecko species. This
Speaker 1: is the ornate flying snake glides from tree to tree
Speaker 1: by flattening its ripped cage and twist through the air
Speaker 1: like a shimmering ribbon. Okay, so it's like the flaring
Speaker 1: adder essentially. So this is another type of flying snake
Speaker 1: species that we have that we didn't know about before. Okay, okay, man,
Speaker 1: I was about to say, I don't know how the
Speaker 1: fuck they got more flying snakes, but I'm not happy
Speaker 1: about it, Sam, go ahead.
Speaker 5: Look, I understand God has a sense of humor, but
Speaker 5: I thought he curse the.
Speaker 6: Fucking serpents, not give them fucking flying No.
Speaker 5: Yeah, you know what, when I go to if I
Speaker 5: go to having it, would I to have the chance
Speaker 5: to speak to the Lord.
Speaker 6: I'm gonna ask you, why make the snakes? Is bad
Speaker 6: enough that my axes were snakes? Why have the actual
Speaker 6: animal now?
Speaker 1: Funnily enough, so, if you look at the earliest inscriptions
Speaker 1: involving angels, they are typically snakes with wings. That's also
Speaker 1: why we have that classification of angel called the sarah
Speaker 1: philm like that. There are those that believe that that
Speaker 1: might be something of a serpent belief system on that
Speaker 1: or not. I don't believe that personally, But even if
Speaker 1: you look at the ancient Jewish pictograms of what they
Speaker 1: believed in angelic would look like or something, it was
Speaker 1: typically a snake with wings, which is where they also
Speaker 1: say the caduces comes from the medical symbol with the
Speaker 1: staff of the twos with snakes and ship.
Speaker 5: That was supposed to come from the Greeks because the
Speaker 5: guy who did it, uh, he was a he eventually
Speaker 5: became a god or whatever he was. He was like
Speaker 5: the perfect healer and everything, which if you're going to
Speaker 5: get into that, I believe that the Greeks and the
Speaker 5: Egyptians because they did have a comd when they became
Speaker 5: after everything, there was a comblank. I think they were
Speaker 5: doing jan a DNA, splcense the gods and everything, and
Speaker 5: he was a sentence, one sentence to sum up all
Speaker 5: of Greek mythology. Unfortunately for Hony.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's pretty much it. But you could look at
Speaker 1: and honestly, even if you look at the Egyptian pantheon
Speaker 1: pre Ptolome, right, because I mean when you're talking about
Speaker 1: the blending of the gods and all this shit were
Speaker 1: basically I mean, they went on before the Tholemaic Empire.
Speaker 1: Don't get me wrong, the Greeks knew the Egyptians there
Speaker 1: and vice versa. But when Ttolome, who was one of
Speaker 1: Alexander's top generals, when he came in and pretty much
Speaker 1: took over Egypt and his lineage ran it for the
Speaker 1: next dynasty, and all that shit there definitely was way
Speaker 1: more of a blending of cultures than ever before. The
Speaker 1: Egyptian pantheon and what they believed as far as who
Speaker 1: their gods were and the stories behind them and all that.
Speaker 1: It was a lot of it based around sex, like
Speaker 1: the very similar to the Greeks, very similar to the Romans,
Speaker 1: the very similar to the Uh, the Sumerians, it all
Speaker 1: the Romans.
Speaker 6: It was just straight talky and paste of the Greeks.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 5: But point Cason, point, the sphinx is the creature that
Speaker 5: is in that's physically in Egypt, but it's talked about
Speaker 5: in the story of Jason and the Jason the Organauts,
Speaker 5: and also, I want to say also was mentioned in
Speaker 5: the Iliad, And now.
Speaker 1: I'm Jason predates Jason's story predates the Iliad.
Speaker 5: Yeah, but yes, but the sphinx also was It's riddle, well,
Speaker 5: what walks on four legs and the morning, two legs,
Speaker 5: mid day and three days, I mean three legs at
Speaker 5: the end of the day. That is, it's the it's
Speaker 5: describing a man's life for days. It's weird how they
Speaker 5: have those connections. A creature, the creature UH is in
Speaker 5: both places simultaneously. But the sphinxes in the jason Anenos
Speaker 5: pre dates the Homer's Odyssey, you know, in the Idiot
Speaker 5: it does.
Speaker 1: But also if you're looking into the whole snakes with
Speaker 1: Wings conversation, So Wes huff I absolutely love the work
Speaker 1: he does. He has released a couple of videos on
Speaker 1: YouTube about these inscriptions that we see in these depictions
Speaker 1: of snakes with wings on it and where that stems
Speaker 1: from as far as early Hebrew and Egyptian sources. It's
Speaker 1: very fascinating to look at as a matter of fact.
Speaker 1: So can't recommend everybody go check him out on YouTube
Speaker 1: and watch it. But anyway, moving on, So European allies
Speaker 1: say Russia is helping Iran more than the US has acknowledged. Now,
Speaker 1: all right, we're gonna read this article, but we also
Speaker 1: we already knew this, and it's basically about targeting information. Right,
Speaker 1: The Iranians weren't actually getting any kind of real good
Speaker 1: hits on American installations until the Russians started giving them
Speaker 1: satellite information. Just so we're all clear, this could be
Speaker 1: said about Ukraine there. Basically, Russia is hooking up Iran
Speaker 1: in this proxy war the same way that America was
Speaker 1: hooking up Ukraine in that proxy war. It's the wording
Speaker 1: of this title makes it seem like this is some
Speaker 1: sort of like breaking news Russia is hooking up Iran.
Speaker 1: It's like, yeah, Russia and Iran have been homies for
Speaker 1: years now. They've never been shy about that. They're a
Speaker 1: part of what's considered the axis of evil. That's a
Speaker 1: term that the West uses anyway, and so like, okay,
Speaker 1: obviously they're gonna help them in some way. Right now,
Speaker 1: you have thousands of North Korean troops that are getting
Speaker 1: sent to Russia for the Ukrainian thing. There's there's a group,
Speaker 1: there's a group of some countries that are like the
Speaker 1: usual suspects so to speak, that are all working together
Speaker 1: in multiple proxy wars right now. This is not a
Speaker 1: new take, but let's see what the article has to say.
Speaker 1: This is CBS, So I mean, you gotta take that
Speaker 1: for you know, with a grain of salt. European allies
Speaker 1: are publicly and privately telling American diplomats that Russia is
Speaker 1: directly and materially helping Iran's war efforts beyond what the
Speaker 1: US will publicly acknowledge. The Europeans are also continuing to
Speaker 1: argue that the war in Ukraine, the largest land war
Speaker 1: in Europe since World War II, is intertwined with the
Speaker 1: war in Iran due to the cooperation between Russia and Iran.
Speaker 1: This is coming from European sources, and again gotta take
Speaker 1: that with a grain of salt too. The UK official
Speaker 1: told CBS News that Russian Iranian defense cooperation has ballooned
Speaker 1: in recent years and Iranian technological advancement is now visible
Speaker 1: in the attacks in the Middle East. Again, to the
Speaker 1: shock of no one, the United Kingdom assesses that Iran
Speaker 1: had not only transferred Shahi drones to Moscow for use
Speaker 1: on the battlefield in Ukraine, but also production know how
Speaker 1: to Russia, which has helped Iran refine its drone warfare.
Speaker 1: The UK official could not confirm a recent transfer of
Speaker 1: hardware to Iran by Russia. Again, before we continue the
Speaker 1: same way that America has been hooking up Ukraine with
Speaker 1: satellite targeting information with that proxy war, it's not a
Speaker 1: crazy stretch to say that Russia has been hooking up
Speaker 1: Iran in this proxy war. That I find that weird,
Speaker 1: and I will say that I don't believe that we
Speaker 1: are currently in World War three I believe that we
Speaker 1: are a world at war, but not to the scale
Speaker 1: of calling it a quote unquote world war. And there's
Speaker 1: some distinctions there. We'll talk about that at the end
Speaker 1: of this article. But anyway, France's Foreign Minister Jean Noel
Speaker 1: Barote Barrett Barrah publicly described the relationship between Russian and
Speaker 1: Iran as two way cooperation. Duh. There are reasons to
Speaker 1: believe that Russia is now supporting Iran's military efforts, which
Speaker 1: appear to be directed in particular at American targets. Of course,
Speaker 1: Earlier this week, Ukraine's President Zelensky said on a social
Speaker 1: media post that his country had irrefutable evidence that Russians
Speaker 1: are providing signals, intelligence and electronic intelligence capabilities to the
Speaker 1: Iranian regime. Again, I feel like that was a take
Speaker 1: that we all knew, but Zelensky is at least he's
Speaker 1: trying to stay relevant. That's why I see here. But anyway,
Speaker 1: on Saturday, he said, an intelligence briefing shows that US
Speaker 1: military facilities in the Middle East and the Gulf region
Speaker 1: were photographed by Russian satellites and the interest of Iran.
Speaker 1: So how would Zelensky had that information, you might ask,
Speaker 1: because they have Ukrainian hackers that are trying to break
Speaker 1: into every single Russian line that they can, and Russia's
Speaker 1: got hackers trying to break into every single Ukrainian line
Speaker 1: that they have. Of course, duh, but yeah, it makes
Speaker 1: perfect sense to me that Russia would be using their
Speaker 1: satellites to give Iranians up to date, accurate information for
Speaker 1: the situation at hand. This isn't this isn't a controversial take.
Speaker 1: This is kind of how wars are being fought these days.
Speaker 1: I get it. Uh moving on? Uh Wait, I said
Speaker 1: that one already. Yeah. He said in a social media
Speaker 1: post that Russians selites captured images of the US UK
Speaker 1: Joint Military Facility in Diego, Garcia, in the Indian Ocean,
Speaker 1: Kuwait International Airport, the Prince Sultan air Base in Saudi Arabia,
Speaker 1: and locations in Turkey and Katar. I heard reports that
Speaker 1: Iran had sent some rockets towards Turkey. I didn't verify them.
Speaker 1: I don't know if Iran has actually launched anything towards
Speaker 1: Turkey or not the way that they were shooting at
Speaker 1: everybody for a minute there, maybe, but I don't. I
Speaker 1: don't know that. But okay, I definitely know that they
Speaker 1: launched into Saudi Arabia, into Kuwait, into Iraq. I even
Speaker 1: saw they launched them into Pakistan, Qatar. The UAE they
Speaker 1: were launching them, but it wasn't at those countries. It
Speaker 1: was at the American installations in those countries. But they missed.
Speaker 1: They hit a couple of them, they did, but more
Speaker 1: of them missed than what hit in France. Following the
Speaker 1: G seven meeting on Friday, Secretary of State Mark Rubio
Speaker 1: downplayed the cooperation between Iran and Russia. Shocker. He doesn't
Speaker 1: want the White House does not want to get people
Speaker 1: repissed off at Russia right now. They're trying to end
Speaker 1: that Ukrainian conflicts. They're trying to soften the image. So
Speaker 1: Rubio went on records saying, there is nothing Russia is
Speaker 1: doing for Iran that is in any way impeding or
Speaker 1: affecting our operation or the effectiveness of it. That's the
Speaker 1: best way I could put it, okay. On Saturday, Zelenski
Speaker 1: visited the UAE, which is close relations with Russia. He
Speaker 1: has been offering the UAE the unique anti drone technology
Speaker 1: used by Ukraine for defensive purposes, as the Gulf states
Speaker 1: that host the US bases have become recent targets of Iran.
Speaker 1: Multiple sources, including a senior US official with direct knowledge,
Speaker 1: told CBS News in March that Russia is providing intelligence
Speaker 1: to Iran regarding US positions in the Middle East. The
Speaker 1: European Union's top diplomat said Thursday that Russia is providing
Speaker 1: intelligence support to Iran to quote kill Americans end quote
Speaker 1: again to the shock of you know what. Wait, this
Speaker 1: is all very open source information here, but all right,
Speaker 1: we see that Russia is helping Iran with intelligence to
Speaker 1: target Americans, to kill Americans. And Russia is also supporting
Speaker 1: Iran now with the drones so that they can attack
Speaker 1: neighboring countries and also US military bases. That's from Kaja
Speaker 1: kallis probably mispronounced the name. It doesn't matter. That's told
Speaker 1: the G seven leaders. Also on Thursday, UK Secretary of
Speaker 1: Defense John Healey said that he sees the hidden hand
Speaker 1: of Putin behind Iran's war effort. Okay, and when asked
Speaker 1: about the reports of Russia sharing military intelligence with Iran,
Speaker 1: Defense Secretary Pete Heggs had told sixty Minutes that President
Speaker 1: Trump was well aware of who's talking and who and
Speaker 1: anything that shouldn't be happening is being confronted and confronted strongly.
Speaker 1: But is it though? But like, is it though? Because
Speaker 1: we're not sending up any kind of scramblings of the
Speaker 1: Russian satellites there are being used to target our bases
Speaker 1: because we don't want to go into open conflict with Russia,
Speaker 1: We're cool with using Ukraine as a proxy war for
Speaker 1: that's that's kind of you see what I'm saying with this.
Speaker 1: The US intelligence publicly disclosed this month that there is
Speaker 1: selective cooperation among China, Russia, Iran and North Korea, driven
Speaker 1: by the common goal of balancing US efforts and actions,
Speaker 1: but found it was short of adversary alignment of interests.
Speaker 1: I would respectfully disagree with that one, but okay. The
Speaker 1: Worldwide Threat Assessment by the US Director of National Intelligence
Speaker 1: concluded that the four countries share concerns about directly confronting
Speaker 1: the US, which constrains the scope of their relationships. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Of course, in the meantime, there is high demand among Israel,
Speaker 1: golf allies and Ukraine and by the US made interceptors
Speaker 1: or two by the US made interceptors used to take
Speaker 1: down incoming missiles. But honestly, dude, I get that, like
Speaker 1: all these countries are now wanting to buy like Patriots
Speaker 1: and attack THEMS and all. I get it, I fully
Speaker 1: get it. I don't think we can ramp up production
Speaker 1: enough right now to fill the needs of all these
Speaker 1: people if we had to. I think Northrop is the
Speaker 1: one that makes the Patriot, Northrop Grumman. If I'm not mistaken,
Speaker 1: or it's not Boeing, I forget, it's one of the
Speaker 1: big the big three on that one. But no, it's
Speaker 1: not Raytheon. I know it's not Raytheon. But my point is,
Speaker 1: a couple months ago before any of this shit, Trump
Speaker 1: had put in an order for like remember we talked
Speaker 1: about that was like two hundred and sixty eight new Patriots.
Speaker 1: We need them now, And everybody thought that was really
Speaker 1: strange because he was saying that he was going to
Speaker 1: make the Golden Dome over the United States. Is that
Speaker 1: just what he told us? In reality he was getting
Speaker 1: ready to sell him to a bunch of Arab countries
Speaker 1: or was it actually meant to go in the United States?
Speaker 1: And now all these production Patriots systems are about to
Speaker 1: get sold to the Arab States because you know, just
Speaker 1: kind of shook out that way. I don't know. I'm
Speaker 1: not saying that he's a brilliant tactician by any means.
Speaker 1: I see him as a dude with business sacumen, and
Speaker 1: maybe he knew that things are going to be going
Speaker 1: down and that people were gonna want this system, so
Speaker 1: he already got the ball rolling for one thing. I
Speaker 1: don't know anyway, Uh, in the meantime, there is high
Speaker 1: demand money. I already said that, right. So Rubio argued
Speaker 1: that the US saiale and allocation of defense of equipment
Speaker 1: to Ukraine has not been negatively impacted by the need
Speaker 1: for interceptive interceptors in the Middle East. He said that
Speaker 1: NATO mccan mechanism Jesus, the NATO mechanism to purchase that
Speaker 1: weaponry has been unaffected. But he did acknowledge that the
Speaker 1: US may redirect weaponry in the future. Yep. If we
Speaker 1: need something for America and it's American, we're going to
Speaker 1: keep it for America first. But as of now that
Speaker 1: has not happened. Well, yeah, because nobody's actually attacking us proper.
Speaker 1: So anyway, a lot of this we kind of could
Speaker 1: figure without being told out loud. Iran doesn't have an
Speaker 1: incredible satellite program, but you need satellite targeting to use
Speaker 1: some of the rockets that they have been doing, So
Speaker 1: it would make sense that they call one of their
Speaker 1: allies who does have a pretty sizable satellite program to
Speaker 1: get some targeting information, the same way we've been giving
Speaker 1: Ukraine targeting information. I don't see that as crazy, but
Speaker 1: I find it interesting that they reported on it in
Speaker 1: the manner that they did and using the wording that
Speaker 1: they did. Are they trying to get people to not
Speaker 1: forget that Russia is a bad guy here or are
Speaker 1: they trying to say that, like this is going to
Speaker 1: get a lot bigger, This is going to get a
Speaker 1: whole lot worse before it gets better, and this might
Speaker 1: just be a part of World War three? Is this
Speaker 1: a fear mongering tactic or is this them just actually
Speaker 1: reporting on some new intel that they just discovered, which
Speaker 1: is crazy that they just discovered that. But I don't
Speaker 1: know what are your thoughts on this, Tony, I know
Speaker 1: you want to weigh in.
Speaker 4: Yeah, a couple of things I've read and I can't
Speaker 4: find the source now, but most of Russia's satellites are
Speaker 4: going over Ukraine and the satellites, they have a certain
Speaker 4: orbital pattern. They can be adjusted, but they're and they
Speaker 4: do complete a whole circle around the globe, but it's
Speaker 4: like you basically focus them on one area at a time.
Speaker 4: So it's mostly Chinese satellites that are going over Iran
Speaker 4: right now, and China's probably sharing more data with them. Well,
Speaker 4: I'm personally pretty friendly toward Russia and China.
Speaker 1: I know you are. It's the craziest shit to me,
Speaker 1: but you are, indeed.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, there's that. I've read a story and now
Speaker 4: I can't find that one either, that Poland was asked
Speaker 4: to release some fad or Patriot system to go to
Speaker 4: Qatar or something, and Poland wouldn't give it up.
Speaker 1: No way. Poland's selling some weapons and there's no fucking
Speaker 1: way they're buying more than they're selling.
Speaker 4: Huh. And I think the US took some fat out
Speaker 4: of Korea thhaa D theater at my altitude something, but
Speaker 4: that that happened in the beginning, So I mean, obviously,
Speaker 4: and I read somewhere we only make six hundred Patriots
Speaker 4: a year, and we're using them way faster than that
Speaker 4: right now. Uh, ways faster than we've ever needed to
Speaker 4: use them. So there's clearly an economic, you know, supplying
Speaker 4: demand problem here, and we would need to produce way
Speaker 4: way more. Never had to produce it this rate before,
Speaker 4: but if we do now, I'm pretty sure that we could.
Speaker 4: It's so we never needed it before.
Speaker 1: And to your point, we only make like six hundred
Speaker 1: or so a year on an average year. But like
Speaker 1: we talked about this a couple of months ago, Trump
Speaker 1: had put in an order for even more and it
Speaker 1: was out of nowhere, and there was news agencies reporting one.
Speaker 1: It was like, why would we need more? And everybody
Speaker 1: thought that we were doing it for the Golden Dome?
Speaker 1: And is it possible and you're in your opinion here,
Speaker 1: do you think it's possible that Trump knew that some
Speaker 1: shit with iron was going to be going down and
Speaker 1: that these patriots although he told the world that it
Speaker 1: was going to be for the Golden Dome, even though
Speaker 1: that's so unfeasible, that is unfucking feasible for the entirety
Speaker 1: of the continent US to have patriot and ground to
Speaker 1: air defense systems like that. Is it possible that he
Speaker 1: was telling them that that's what it was for, when
Speaker 1: in reality he was getting ready to sell them to
Speaker 1: the air of countries.
Speaker 4: In a word, yes, yeah, yeah, I.
Speaker 1: Think that's way more probable, way more likely, or if.
Speaker 4: Nothing else comes to mind, But George W. Bush in
Speaker 4: two thousand and seven was in Poland selling them some
Speaker 4: kind of missile system, and he was saying it was
Speaker 4: to defend them from Poland. Do you remember hearing I mean, sorry,
Speaker 4: from Iran? From Iran? Do you remember hearing about this?
Speaker 1: Yeah, but I want to say that was Tomahawks. I
Speaker 1: could be I could be wrong, but I do remember
Speaker 1: Bush selling Poland some shit back then. It was like,
Speaker 1: since when does Poland have beef with Iran? That was
Speaker 1: a weird thing to say, but I mean, all right, it.
Speaker 4: Was more about Russia, really, but you didn't want to
Speaker 4: say Russia, so he said Iran.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but that was that was Bush's big thing. Him
Speaker 1: and Putin were cool. They didn't have any beef because
Speaker 1: he was way more focused in Afghanistan and Iraq in
Speaker 1: that whole situation, which then goes into the whole Iran situation.
Speaker 1: But even still, like they've been American politicians, regardless of
Speaker 1: letter designation or side of the aisle or any of that,
Speaker 1: have been going on for years. I can show you
Speaker 1: a clip of Hillary Clinton in the nineties as the
Speaker 1: first Lady, talking about how we needed to go to
Speaker 1: war with Iran. That's that's been a hot button issue
Speaker 1: for a while, but nobody was like really willing to
Speaker 1: address it because you know, Iran had already done that
Speaker 1: thing with like getting hostages and things like that, but
Speaker 1: usually a ransom payment was enough to kind of make
Speaker 1: it go away. Just yeah, it's this has been a
Speaker 1: thing that's been coming for quite some time. I don't
Speaker 1: like the manner at which it kicked off, but this
Speaker 1: is they've been saying this for forever.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, I got so Obama did too. Yeah, very quick.
Speaker 4: Before Sam goes, my overall long analysis of the relationship
Speaker 4: between the US, Israel, and Iran is that the Republican
Speaker 4: Party in Israel, we're actually pretty friendly to Iran. In
Speaker 4: the nineteen eighties, That's why Iran Contra happened, and Israel
Speaker 4: was friendly to Iran because of something called the Periphery Doctrine.
Speaker 4: They wanted to make friends with Iran against the Arabs,
Speaker 4: and it was itzakra beIN who tried to reverse that
Speaker 4: in nineteen ninety five and he was assassinated. Ariel Sharon
Speaker 4: was also a little bit of that mindset, but that
Speaker 4: inversion where Iran became the main enemy didn't happen until
Speaker 4: after Saddam Hussein was taken out of power and the
Speaker 4: rest is history.
Speaker 1: I'm pretty confident I got a video of Killery talking
Speaker 1: in the nineties about Iran being a bad guy.
Speaker 4: Maybe that was so she might have been, you know,
Speaker 4: talking along the lines of Itzacra being at the time,
Speaker 4: but maybe he was a minority you know, that was
Speaker 4: a minority position at that time and it became the
Speaker 4: majority position after about two thousand and three.
Speaker 1: Yeah, because I'm trying to think as far as like
Speaker 1: the Arab country is being seen as a quote unquote threat.
Speaker 1: Before Iran is the bad guy, it was Gadafi that
Speaker 1: was the guy that was the evil one, right, and
Speaker 1: then it was Saddam with the Operation Desert Storm kind
Speaker 1: of conversation, he was the big bad guy in the area,
Speaker 1: and it was they kind of cycled through a few,
Speaker 1: you know, key supervillains that they just needed to go
Speaker 1: and take care of and give those people some freedom
Speaker 1: and shit. But yeah, yeah, I mean, it's just it's
Speaker 1: so messy. It is so greasy, there's no moral high
Speaker 1: grounds on either side. To be honest with you, I
Speaker 1: did want to ask you this though, And you're right
Speaker 1: about satellites how they they only stick around one orbit
Speaker 1: and they can be adjusted. But that's that's a little
Speaker 1: easier said than done. It can be done, but it
Speaker 1: takes some doing. Would it not stand to reason? And
Speaker 1: I don't know this for a fact. I'm genuinely asking
Speaker 1: what you think. Wouldn't it not stand to reason that
Speaker 1: Russia would have at least some satellite assets that's orbiting
Speaker 1: over their bases in Syria?
Speaker 4: I guess so.
Speaker 1: And Syria is if we're looking as the crow flies here,
Speaker 1: it's not too crazy far away from the other Arab
Speaker 1: states that they might be able to get some pictures of.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I guess well, Syria is probably closer to Ukraine
Speaker 4: than it is to Iran. I don't have a map
Speaker 4: up right now, but yeah, if Russian knows useful information
Speaker 4: for Iran, they'll probably give it to them. They've probably
Speaker 4: got ways of doing that. But I also will result
Speaker 4: in the deaths of some Americas.
Speaker 1: And I also would not negate that China is also
Speaker 1: giving Iran some satellite Intel a hundred percent. Pretty much
Speaker 1: like they said in the article here, which we've all
Speaker 1: known about this, North Korea, China, Russia, Iran. They are
Speaker 1: in a weird alliance, but an alliance nonetheless, right. They
Speaker 1: just sent was like twenty thousand new North Korean troops
Speaker 1: to the Ukrainian front. Apparently they're seeing some benefit to this.
Speaker 1: There was a lot of defections that happened, and the
Speaker 1: whole porn situation took place with the North Korean troops.
Speaker 1: Yet that took place. However, the guys that made it
Speaker 1: back they got some real combat training, the likes of
Speaker 1: which nobody in the North Korean Army has received in
Speaker 1: decades and decades. So I think they're starting to do this.
Speaker 1: I don't know if they're gonna start sending whole, you know,
Speaker 1: massive troop movements over there or whatever, but at least
Speaker 1: in small numbers that these guys can come back and
Speaker 1: share that knowledge and that training with the rest of
Speaker 1: the North Korean Army. I could see this becoming more
Speaker 1: of a regular swapout like that if nothing else, maybe
Speaker 1: do like a six month pump and then come back
Speaker 1: home kind of thing. I also would not be shocked
Speaker 1: if China does something similar, What is your take?
Speaker 4: Well, I don't think China's going to send troops, you.
Speaker 1: Do not, Yeah, ask.
Speaker 4: They just they value their reputation of being not an
Speaker 4: interventionist and sticking to their own backyard.
Speaker 1: Are you sure about this, because they've been trying to
Speaker 1: intervene with the whole Cambodia Highland situation, but that's also that's.
Speaker 4: On their border.
Speaker 1: They yeah, they most you know, yeah, I.
Speaker 4: Think that they don't want anything to do with the
Speaker 4: Middle East in terms of military.
Speaker 1: Now, well, with that being said, what about the Iran conversation?
Speaker 1: Because I'm talking about Chinese sending troops to Ukraine, right
Speaker 1: and as far as that that's far enough away to
Speaker 1: where that's far enough removed from them, Iran is a
Speaker 1: critical spot in their Belt and Road initiative. If I'm
Speaker 1: not mistaken, and China buys a lot of their oil
Speaker 1: from Iran, this whole situation is putting a dampering on them.
Speaker 1: I could see possibly China doing what they can to
Speaker 1: hook up Iran, enemy of my enemy, if nothing else.
Speaker 1: But I'm not saying that China's going to deploy troops
Speaker 1: to Iran, not yet. Anyway, it could happen in I
Speaker 1: guess in the future, but I think we're a few
Speaker 1: steps before that level of involvement goes. But as far
Speaker 1: as protecting Chinese interests, it would stand to reason to
Speaker 1: me that they would do what they can to protect
Speaker 1: the Belton Road initiative if nothing else.
Speaker 4: What do you think, Uh, yeah, that is possible. I
Speaker 4: think they would send their troops somewhere not only friendly
Speaker 4: but very unlikely to be in conflict with anyone else,
Speaker 4: such as Pakistan. And I heard they've even sent them
Speaker 4: to somewhere in Africa, but now I can't remember where.
Speaker 1: Kenya if I'm not mistaken.
Speaker 4: Yeah, something like that. Some were super random, but yeah,
Speaker 4: some were sort of peaceful where I haven't heard of
Speaker 4: anything popping off. It's not like Sudan or Somalia, right.
Speaker 1: Right, right, Yeah. I remember hearing that too and thinking like,
Speaker 1: why why are there Chinese tree And I'm not saying
Speaker 1: it was Kenya. I don't know, but I want to say, yeah,
Speaker 1: it wasn't like a war zone. They were sending their
Speaker 1: troops to protect their interests, and it's like, what interest
Speaker 1: do you have here? But I don't know anyway. Now
Speaker 1: to that point, I could also see if Chinese troops
Speaker 1: were to be deployed to Iran, I don't believe that
Speaker 1: they would be trying to get directly involved in any
Speaker 1: kind of conflict. I could see them being set up
Speaker 1: as a defensive posture, specifically over the Chinese Belt and
Speaker 1: roch Belt and road initiative. God words are hard, Like,
Speaker 1: there are points, you know what I'm saying, to try
Speaker 1: to protect some of the pipelines, to protect some of
Speaker 1: the railways and the big hubs, so to speak. But
Speaker 1: if nothing else, they would pretty much set up a
Speaker 1: defensive posture there. I don't believe that they would get
Speaker 1: involved in any kind of frontline conflict areas by any means.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and I just looked it up. There only overseas
Speaker 4: military bases in Djibouti, but that is pretty close to Somalia.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but if we're looking at Djibouti, there's like thirteen
Speaker 1: countries at a military basis. The hell we have a
Speaker 1: military base there. It's actually not far from the Chinese
Speaker 1: base too. It's very crazy. Djibouti is a very very
Speaker 1: very very small country. It's like the size of Rhode Island,
Speaker 1: and there's multiple countries that all happen to have a
Speaker 1: base there because it's like it's in one of those
Speaker 1: spots where it's close enough to the conflict but far
Speaker 1: enough or move to where you could get out of
Speaker 1: dodge if you need kind of thing. But yeah, that's
Speaker 1: a way and that whole country is so poor and
Speaker 1: they speak really good French there, but like they run
Speaker 1: off of cat. That plan if you'll ever seen a
Speaker 1: cat and phillips where they were chewing on them leaves
Speaker 1: and shit, and it basically gives you a low heroin hit.
Speaker 1: That country runs off of cat. That's it. Like the
Speaker 1: people fuck the food deliveries. They want to know when
Speaker 1: those leaf deliveries are coming in. It's very very sad.
Speaker 1: But yeah, the American military base there and all these
Speaker 1: other military bases there, that's like one of their biggest
Speaker 1: sources of income for the entire country. It is wild.
Speaker 1: I know multiple dudes that went on Meuse too, and
Speaker 1: they stopped off in Jibuti for a couple of weeks
Speaker 1: and all of them say, like, this is one of
Speaker 1: the poorest countries they've ever seen, including Afghanistan. It's wild anyway,
Speaker 1: all right, Sam, hand raised what you got.
Speaker 6: Okay, So.
Speaker 5: Not to be old baby down or in the nihilist
Speaker 5: of the group, but were trained to dickheads over in
Speaker 5: Afghanistan to fight off the Russians.
Speaker 6: They then turned around and used it to kill us.
Speaker 5: So now we're gonna say, and the others say, we're
Speaker 5: gonna sell them are some of our patriots systems, which
Speaker 5: is one of the best clinical of today's technology. What's
Speaker 5: to say that they're not gonna then turn up they
Speaker 5: already committed humanity.
Speaker 6: You are humanitarian crimes against humanity, humanity.
Speaker 1: You're gonna be very hard pressed to find an Arab
Speaker 1: Muslim country that doesn't do some sort of a form
Speaker 1: of crimes against humanity. Just so we're clear, even our
Speaker 1: allies do horrible ship to the people.
Speaker 6: That's kind of the case.
Speaker 5: And point I'm gonna say, how are we showing these
Speaker 5: sothering bitches?
Speaker 6: They're gonna stab us in the back and try to
Speaker 6: kill us?
Speaker 5: And oh right, since we gave them our fucking technology
Speaker 5: and fucking old sleepy dickhead Joe he he, he gave them.
Speaker 6: He pretty much gave him on an entire fucking arsenal.
Speaker 6: Do you see where this is going?
Speaker 1: Yeah, But as far as the place where the patriots
Speaker 1: might be going. Patriots are ground to air interceptors. I'm
Speaker 1: not saying it's impossible for somebody to re rig that
Speaker 1: to go ground to ground. I'm saying that it would.
Speaker 1: Basically you're having to redesign the entire system for that.
Speaker 1: So as far as the bad guys quote unquote bad
Speaker 1: guys turning on us and using it against us, highly unlikely,
Speaker 1: at least for the next good.
Speaker 5: While who's to say our allies doesn't turn coat and
Speaker 5: fucking shitus in the back.
Speaker 6: Why we when we helped them in the past. They've
Speaker 6: done it, but these won't comparing.
Speaker 1: But we're also talking about comparing cultures that yes, they're
Speaker 1: all like Muslim countries, but Shia and Sunni operate very differently.
Speaker 1: They all operate differently from the Kurds. And comparing Saudi
Speaker 1: Arabia to or Qatar to Afghanistan, that is I'm trying
Speaker 1: to even think of a comparison.
Speaker 5: They both just out LOBBIEDO fucking Israel to have given
Speaker 5: out politicians money, Larry the patologists, Guy Huban, to have
Speaker 5: lobbied money more to I fucking administration than Israel.
Speaker 1: Have I have been saying that for years and people
Speaker 1: keep thinking, oh, you're just desiring to shill. No, dude,
Speaker 1: the math is the math. If you're gonna say that
Speaker 1: Israel was controlling the American political machine for the last
Speaker 1: few decades, I'm with you, agreed for sure, But the
Speaker 1: last few years, and by a few years, I mean
Speaker 1: like since I would argue twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen to now, Qatar, Uae, Saudi,
Speaker 1: these countries have been making some very strategic plays and
Speaker 1: whose pocket they're throwing money. And yes, currently Qatar has
Speaker 1: donated more to our political scheme than Israel by leaps
Speaker 1: and bounds. Hell, even if you were to take away
Speaker 1: even if you were to take away the new air
Speaker 1: Force one that they just donated to Trump and every dude,
Speaker 1: I just had this whole I had this out with
Speaker 1: somebody the other day too, when I brought that up,
Speaker 1: cause that's lobbying. It's a gift of what four hundred
Speaker 1: million or some shit like that. And they're like, yeah, well,
Speaker 1: they offered it to Biden, but he said no, no,
Speaker 1: they didn't, No, they didn't. They specifically only offered this
Speaker 1: to Trump. They offered Biden some stuff, but they legitimately
Speaker 1: made this plane specifically to go to Trump. No, they
Speaker 1: offered it to the White House position the next president
Speaker 1: will get to use it. No, they won't. This specific
Speaker 1: air force one goes away when Trump goes away. That
Speaker 1: was also a part of the agreement. You could look
Speaker 1: it up. So it's yeah, if we're looking at who's
Speaker 1: actually making some very huge power plays into DC right
Speaker 1: now with finances, katar is up there, not to mention
Speaker 1: the fact that Pam Bondi used to be a lobbyist
Speaker 1: for them.
Speaker 5: Yes, also the Saudi's own they have a stakes in
Speaker 5: the t k O holdings with own w w E
Speaker 5: and UFC.
Speaker 6: They I can't, I don't.
Speaker 5: I don't know if it's the Saudis or if it's
Speaker 5: the Karates, or if it's the m rights.
Speaker 6: But they just bought who was e A Yeah.
Speaker 5: They bought that, which I'm like, they've got all the
Speaker 5: fucking shooters because keep on EA games got in TOBO
Speaker 5: when they got no of honor take now because you
Speaker 5: could play out of the Taliban.
Speaker 1: Yeah. But let's also not forget the fact that I
Speaker 1: think it might be it's guitar or Saudi or even
Speaker 1: a little bit of both. They have started how many
Speaker 1: sports leagues, professional sports leagues, and they're offering not just
Speaker 1: American athletes, athletes from all over the world triple what
Speaker 1: they would have made with sponsorship in America to specifically
Speaker 1: play for their leagues. They have was the PGA, right
Speaker 1: the golf. They now have this Arab golf league paying
Speaker 1: these dudes out the fucking face money to do the
Speaker 1: same shit they would have done in America. And these
Speaker 1: dudes are like, yeah, bro, I'll come, I'll come, dick
Speaker 1: slap some dangers for the for the qataris what's up?
Speaker 1: I'm down? And like, who could blame them, honestly, but yeah,
Speaker 1: they are trying to reformat the way that they are
Speaker 1: viewed on the world stage. Yeah, they have some human
Speaker 1: rights atrocities. Yeah they they you know, execute at least
Speaker 1: one dude a day and they have for years. Fine, fine, okay,
Speaker 1: But they're also paying out very heavily. They're also doing
Speaker 1: these comedy tours. They're also starting their own version of NASCAR.
Speaker 1: They're also like they're they're trying to give themselves a
Speaker 1: facelift on the world stage right now. And I would
Speaker 1: argue that it is going very very well for them
Speaker 1: because most people when you add them what their thoughts
Speaker 1: are about Dubai or what their thoughts are about Riod
Speaker 1: or any of these things. If you would have asked
Speaker 1: them fifteen years ago, they would have had a very
Speaker 1: different answer than they have these days. I think that
Speaker 1: the the gambit is working, so to speak.
Speaker 6: I understand that, but which shown.
Speaker 5: It was? The shot he's out? Were the ones that
Speaker 5: flew the planes into them, not into the Twins house?
Speaker 1: But correct all the.
Speaker 6: Noted isn't this also the same ones that besides that?
Speaker 6: But they also need a one? What they also trying
Speaker 6: to kill Israel?
Speaker 1: Yes, every talking about like the Seven Day War or
Speaker 1: something like that. Yeah, Saudi Arabia has been pretty okay
Speaker 1: with Israel for quite some time now, kind of like Jordan.
Speaker 1: Uh Jordan also was a part of the sixth Day
Speaker 1: warn like all these countries attacked them all at once.
Speaker 1: But most of israel sabers most have worked had a
Speaker 1: really good arrangement with them, because even though they don't
Speaker 1: fuck with them, they also don't want to, like they
Speaker 1: want the smoke they're cool with, like working out some
Speaker 1: sort of an agreement for business purposes, if that makes sense.
Speaker 5: So you're a gentleman of history, frighten me if I'm on.
Speaker 5: But has it like the last couple of wars since
Speaker 5: the state of that the Count of Israel has been reinstated,
Speaker 5: have they not all been defensive wars?
Speaker 1: Well, that is a matter of perspective. There have been
Speaker 1: quite a few where, Uh there was some hostage takings
Speaker 1: from some Arab nations. Uh, there were some bombings that
Speaker 1: took place. I know people personally live in Israel and
Speaker 1: some people that personally live in Gaza, and they would
Speaker 1: get mortars seems like every day. Like I personally know
Speaker 1: a guy who like bringing his kids to school and
Speaker 1: I did last time I spoke to him was nine
Speaker 1: and just driving his kids to school every day. They
Speaker 1: would get stuck in traffic. It was very normal rush
Speaker 1: hour kind of traffic, and there'd be sirens that would
Speaker 1: go off. He and his kids would have to get
Speaker 1: out of their car just kind of kneel down in
Speaker 1: a ditch and they would pray, and you would hear
Speaker 1: five or six explosions go down, and then they would
Speaker 1: get back in their car and go to work. And
Speaker 1: they were praying because they knew that it could hit
Speaker 1: their car. There was no way of it was like
Speaker 1: scud missiles or some shit that happened pretty frequently, and
Speaker 1: it has for quite some time. Israel has been in
Speaker 1: a state of war essentially in one regard or another
Speaker 1: since they were founded. But as far as the key
Speaker 1: players that would try to take them over, Saudi Arabia
Speaker 1: hasn't really come at them in quite some time. Egypt
Speaker 1: hasn't come at them in quite some time. Jordan. You
Speaker 1: could argue Lebanon, you could argue Syria, you could argue Iran.
Speaker 1: But it's like it ebbs and flows with administration to
Speaker 1: administration in decade to decade, honestly, of who is the
Speaker 1: quote unquote aggressor.
Speaker 6: Well, thank you, I'm gonna definitely look into it more.
Speaker 5: But I I've I only have the I don't want.
Speaker 5: Only that I'm idn't have any knowledge of is the
Speaker 5: one that's currently going on that in the Gaza war
Speaker 5: that happened on October seventh and everything. I feel like
Speaker 5: at that point when that happened, the Israel had all
Speaker 5: the lots to pretty much get their lick back and
Speaker 5: everything because they targeting a musical festival.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that that took place wrong.
Speaker 5: A couple Americans were killed in I think we should
Speaker 5: have really got started got into the Gostel for that.
Speaker 1: But we also need to not negate the fact that
Speaker 1: the is it October sixth, October seventh, when the when
Speaker 1: Hamas came in and took the hostages and all these
Speaker 1: things that led to the Gaza situation. All of that
Speaker 1: we don't need to negate. The fact that mus allowed
Speaker 1: that to happen very much of a false flag nature.
Speaker 1: There's no way they couldn't have. And that also ties
Speaker 1: back to Biden, because there was a prisoner exchange between
Speaker 1: Iran and the United States, and you could, aside for
Speaker 1: anything else, making a deal with Ron is not the
Speaker 1: best move that Biden could have done. But he also
Speaker 1: threw them six billion dollars as a sweetener that they
Speaker 1: didn't even ask for. Right after Iran got this, on
Speaker 1: account of for six billion dollars, Hamas started stocking up
Speaker 1: on weapons and stocking up on manpower and all these things.
Speaker 1: Moussad saw it all. They clearly could tell, because I mean,
Speaker 1: especially if Gaza was in fact the open air prison
Speaker 1: that so many people claim it was, there's no way
Speaker 1: that they could have amassed weapons these paragliders, the explosives,
Speaker 1: all of these things. There's no way that they could
Speaker 1: have smoke all of that into this open air prison
Speaker 1: without the guards i e. The IDF knowing about it.
Speaker 1: So Mussad knew that it was going down the day
Speaker 1: it happened. The defenses of Israel were just down accidentally.
Speaker 6: That doesn't make no sense.
Speaker 1: None of it does. None of it does, so in
Speaker 1: my personal opinion, Net and Yahoo specifically, but you could
Speaker 1: go down the list of the shitheads who essentially allowed
Speaker 1: that to happen, knowing that they would have their own
Speaker 1: people get killed and hostages and slaughtered and all the
Speaker 1: stuff to justify them invading the Goal On Heights and
Speaker 1: Gaza or the West Bank excuse me? Which yeah, And
Speaker 1: I think that that was all done specifically so that
Speaker 1: they could try to justify either a getting rid of
Speaker 1: Palestine or B basically sequestering them to even smaller land areas.
Speaker 6: So at that more I learned about the Prime Minister.
Speaker 6: More I do not like you.
Speaker 1: Oh no, no, please, don't don't take it like he's
Speaker 1: the only shipthead. Keep in mind, we just talked about
Speaker 1: how Pearl Harbor, like FDR knew it was happening, and
Speaker 1: let happen anyway. That's not the only time that's happened either.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. It's not the only time that a president
Speaker 1: has done it. Britain has done similar shit, France has
Speaker 1: done similar shit, like they a lot of these countries
Speaker 1: have done this before, because it's the best way to
Speaker 1: get the hearts and minds of your population to be
Speaker 1: on the same page of we need war is to
Speaker 1: get attacked. That's that's a playbook that has been used
Speaker 1: throughout the course of history.
Speaker 6: Dude, I understand that it just.
Speaker 5: We're raised up in our culture, the Western culture, that
Speaker 5: life has value, innate value. I just I know what happens.
Speaker 5: I know that the inite don't give a fuck about us.
Speaker 5: I'm a lot more aware of that. But I just
Speaker 5: feel like the other president under saying, you don't really
Speaker 5: give a fuck abasket. You're supposed to at least care
Speaker 5: about next to you know what, You're supposed to not
Speaker 5: want your countryman to get killed.
Speaker 6: It's fucked up.
Speaker 1: So is the president's job to protect the American people
Speaker 1: or is the president's job to make sure that the
Speaker 1: American country is pushed to further heights and sometimes that
Speaker 1: requires cracking a few eggs to make an omland for
Speaker 1: the quote unquote greater good whatever he sees fit. I'm
Speaker 1: of the opinion that the presidency is more to further
Speaker 1: American interests than it is to protect the American people.
Speaker 1: To be honest with you, I don't believe the government
Speaker 1: has ever really been about protecting the American people. It's
Speaker 1: more about wheeling and dealing on a global stage to
Speaker 1: make sure that we stay on top.
Speaker 5: I yeah, I feel like to formos is to protect
Speaker 5: the the ideals of.
Speaker 6: Our country, the truths, justice and all that.
Speaker 5: But like I understand, that's just me being naive and
Speaker 5: me being hopeful.
Speaker 1: I get it, but I don't know, dude, it's very fucked up.
Speaker 1: Well we live in but the same thing. So back
Speaker 1: to the whole Israel thing, Netan Yahoo wasn't trying to
Speaker 1: protect Israel by allowing this to go down. But you
Speaker 1: could also make an argument. I disagree with this argument,
Speaker 1: but you can make the argument to say that he
Speaker 1: allowed the attack to happen so that they could kick
Speaker 1: out all the quote unquote Palestinians and that would further
Speaker 1: Israel's their intentions, so to speak. It was putting them
Speaker 1: in a better light, which was the quote unquote greater good.
Speaker 1: So he knew that Iran was going to fund them
Speaker 1: with more weapons and more manpower, and he allowed that
Speaker 1: to happen. Now, this whole running thing, it's because they
Speaker 1: have nukes. They didn't were they trying to refine uranium
Speaker 1: for sure? For sure they didn't have a payload delivery
Speaker 1: system that could do that by multiple experts opinions. So
Speaker 1: it's not like Iran was actually at risk of developing
Speaker 1: a nuclear weapon. But war is good for business.
Speaker 7: And.
Speaker 5: Disagree with the you're saying, well, they might not have
Speaker 5: the delivery system, that doesn't mean that they can't refine it.
Speaker 5: Put it in a fucking cannister or whatever, packed, put
Speaker 5: it in a court packed that bitch full of fucking
Speaker 5: c four whatever.
Speaker 6: You got a duddy bomb out there, that's oh yeah.
Speaker 1: They they definitely have the delivery system to get it
Speaker 1: to Israel, but they didn't have delivery system to get
Speaker 1: it to America. So as far as like why America
Speaker 1: is throwing in our lot with this conversation and the
Speaker 1: whole Iranian situation, I see it as there's multiple sides
Speaker 1: of this conversation honestly, dude, because while on one side
Speaker 1: we're keeping the proxy wars going to prevent a global war,
Speaker 1: on another side, the straight up horror moves is shut down,
Speaker 1: and all these European nations that rely so heavily on
Speaker 1: the trade to go through the straight of Horn moves
Speaker 1: are now realizing, oh shit, if this was happening, that
Speaker 1: they don't want to get involved in Iran. They're very
Speaker 1: clear that they are not going to get involved in Iran. However,
Speaker 1: I think they're starting to understand that, Okay, once this
Speaker 1: situation irons itself out, someone else, some other situation could
Speaker 1: happen that would shut down the straight of Horn moves
Speaker 1: and that would affect us even further. We need to
Speaker 1: up our military defense spending, which is what Trump was
Speaker 1: trying to get them to do when he was trying
Speaker 1: to increase all of NATO's spending to five percent. This
Speaker 1: was more or less the Hegelian dialect problem reaction solution.
Speaker 1: And if they couldn't see that the five percent was
Speaker 1: a solution because they just found their own reasons for it.
Speaker 1: Now there is a problem that they are now seeing
Speaker 1: the reaction to will be upping their defense spending and
Speaker 1: buying more patriot systems and all these things. You see
Speaker 1: what I'm saying. It's like it's like corporate espionage, but
Speaker 1: on the global geopolitical warfront scale. If this makes.
Speaker 6: Sense, it does understand and everything.
Speaker 5: It was like I was telling you last night, how
Speaker 5: the European or the last three, how the Europeans they
Speaker 5: tend to stay twenty thirty years. What I gotta standstill,
Speaker 5: it happened in World War One.
Speaker 6: It happened.
Speaker 5: It happened in the when when England and flintch went
Speaker 5: toward during the Thirty Year War, which if you didn't
Speaker 5: want to say the Thirty Years War was actually should
Speaker 5: have really been World War One technique if you want
Speaker 5: to label them as such, because that had it spanned
Speaker 5: thirty years and it had did multiple countries all fighting,
Speaker 5: so that was a thirty year world war.
Speaker 1: Mm hmm. I've heard the argument thirty year old War
Speaker 1: was actually World War One, and I gotta say the
Speaker 1: arguments pretty compelling, honestly, but so.
Speaker 5: And it was honestly and said, I don't know what
Speaker 5: World War too will be taking on.
Speaker 6: World War three will be fault with, but World War
Speaker 6: four will be fought with sticks and stones.
Speaker 5: So I think this would actually if this does evolve
Speaker 5: into a world war, I'd say that this would actually
Speaker 5: be World War four.
Speaker 1: Yeah. But also I'm still of the belief that nukes
Speaker 1: are not going to get used by any country.
Speaker 5: Oh yes, no, no, I highly doubt nukes will ever
Speaker 5: be used, because why would like, if.
Speaker 6: Anyone's gonna use nukes, it'd be the foote And we all.
Speaker 1: Know I talked, why would that this answer?
Speaker 6: Look up the French nuclear doction. Look it up. You'll
Speaker 6: be surprised.
Speaker 1: I'm afraid to give me the rundown.
Speaker 5: If they even have an inkling of an idea that
Speaker 5: somebody's gonna nuke them, they will, they will send all
Speaker 5: of the rockets to them.
Speaker 1: But nobody wants the nuke France. They're not like at
Speaker 1: the key moment of conversation of anybody's agenda.
Speaker 6: These days, they eat slugs.
Speaker 1: I I've had it. Their snails are phenomenal as cargo
Speaker 1: is delicious.
Speaker 6: You can have it. You won't know.
Speaker 1: I love it.
Speaker 4: The French, I mean, obviously the.
Speaker 6: French. Australia.
Speaker 1: Oh, I'm not exactly. I'm not super fond of macrone.
Speaker 1: I'm not super fond of his administration or his tranny wife,
Speaker 1: but like art slash uncle. But I mean as far
Speaker 1: as that goes, like if you were to say, well, no, no, fuck,
Speaker 1: I don't know, dude, but if you were to say
Speaker 1: that somebody was going to try to nuke England, the
Speaker 1: UK is at least they're almost to the pinnacle of relevancy.
Speaker 1: They've kind of taken a few steps back. France has
Speaker 1: been way back, Poland, Germany even kind of maybe they're
Speaker 1: starting to like revitalize their military in big ways. But
Speaker 1: even still, I don't think that. I don't think any
Speaker 1: country in Europe is in the conversation as far as like,
Speaker 1: oh a newke could be used there, The best case
Speaker 1: would be Ukraine. But even still, I don't think they're
Speaker 1: at risk of getting nuked, because if they were, they
Speaker 1: would have been already.
Speaker 6: You mean the Air Kingdom of London.
Speaker 1: Right of course, the the Caliphate of the UK.
Speaker 5: You know, Yeah, that that harnestly if I think if
Speaker 5: there will be any air country with an actual new
Speaker 5: fush would be probably.
Speaker 6: But.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it would be an air country with a nuke.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I am one hundred percent being serious that currently,
Speaker 5: uh the damn Near band and I can't remember which
Speaker 5: part I was saw video of it today. They're they're
Speaker 5: trying to ban dogs in public eye but because certain
Speaker 5: demographics are afraid of dogs. But yet they can go
Speaker 5: the funk back because over in Turkey they have they
Speaker 5: rounded up all the dogs in Turkey and put them
Speaker 5: all on the island.
Speaker 6: Yeah, so of dogs in the UK.
Speaker 1: I had to look more into that. Yeah, Muslims really
Speaker 1: do not like dogs. I didn't know this. But they
Speaker 1: also believe that God has two right hands and three eyes,
Speaker 1: so I mean take that for you.
Speaker 5: I don't believe that the sun drops into a puddle
Speaker 5: of mud, which is a really good dad, but they
Speaker 5: think the sun goes into a puddle of mud.
Speaker 1: They also believe they're at this flat. That's what their
Speaker 1: mom said. Anyway, Anyway, we're getting way off topic here.
Speaker 1: But anyway, Tony, I'll see you on muted. Did you
Speaker 1: have anything you wanted to weigh in on.
Speaker 4: A whole bunch of stuff. So, Israel's main wars were
Speaker 4: in nineteen forty eight, nineteen sixty seven, and nineteen seventy three,
Speaker 4: and their main enemies for all of those were Egypt
Speaker 4: and trans Jordan which is now called Jordan.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 4: And as for who was aggressor and defender, Israel insisted
Speaker 4: it was the defender in all three cases. I don't
Speaker 4: know enough to say for sure whether they were and
Speaker 4: I'm not I am pretty anty, but I'm also not
Speaker 4: going to say they were one hundred percent the aggressor.
Speaker 4: I don't know how to firmly categorize that situation. But
Speaker 4: in the nineteen eighties, Egypt and Jordan made peace with Israel,
Speaker 4: and that's been the case to the state. The only
Speaker 4: time that ever maybe almost got interrupted was Mohammed Morci
Speaker 4: in twenty thirteen after the Arab Spring in Egypt. But
Speaker 4: Saudi Arabia hasn't had much to do positive or negative
Speaker 4: with Israel. But Israel's main enemies were Syria, Iraq, and
Speaker 4: Lebanon and Areran. And as for you mentioned nine to eleven,
Speaker 4: the fifteen of the nineteen hijackers were Saudi, the other
Speaker 4: few were Lebanese and Egyptian, I think, but I'd encourage
Speaker 4: everyone to look up the five Dancing Israelis as they're known,
Speaker 4: Jarren Schmuuel, Ahudo Dead, Paul and Sevan Kirksburg and Omer
Speaker 4: Maar Maari, who had advanced knowledge of it and they
Speaker 4: were observing it from Dork Towers, a complex in New
Speaker 4: Jersey across the U across the Hudson River before it happened.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I'm gonna I'm gonna have this.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, you already emailed me. Thank you. I just
Speaker 4: did not get back to you yet, but I will.
Speaker 6: Yeah. When I emailed Jacob, I emailed you.
Speaker 1: Yes indeed, which also we uh, if you emailed the
Speaker 1: Cult of Conspiracy at Yahoo, we are about to swap
Speaker 1: everything over to Cult of Conspiracy podcast at Gmail. So
Speaker 1: oh you do have all of the yahoos. We got
Speaker 1: all of that, but because of some some issues with
Speaker 1: PayPal and and billing and our accountant stuff, we're swapping
Speaker 1: everything to a Gmail that hasn't gone full tilt just yet,
Speaker 1: but that is going to be happening here, probably in
Speaker 1: the next couple of weeks. But yes, still gonna make
Speaker 1: it happen.
Speaker 6: I need you to send me the the a po boss.
Speaker 6: I got a gift for you, and.
Speaker 1: Okay, I got you dude for sure. Also, Norse Trucker,
Speaker 1: it's on the way, brother, It's on the fucking way.
Speaker 1: I if they kick it back this time, I swear
Speaker 1: to God, and it's not our local post office. They are.
Speaker 1: They're here, they're trying to help us. They don't understand
Speaker 1: what's going on at the border. But dude, at this point,
Speaker 1: we're gonna have to just figure out a way to
Speaker 1: drone drop it to you or some shit.
Speaker 6: Yeah, it's all good. Whenever it gets there, it gets here.
Speaker 1: Yeah, right, good ship man.
Speaker 5: I'm actually yeah, I'm actually traveling down the highway right now.
Speaker 4: That's why I'm.
Speaker 8: Weighing.
Speaker 1: Ah, you cool. Well, while you're doing that, let's listen
Speaker 1: to this. So Donald Trump, President has now he just
Speaker 1: let out this like hour and a half, two hour
Speaker 1: long press release to talk about the situation in Iran,
Speaker 1: and I got a couple of videos and an article
Speaker 1: pulled out that we're going to talk about here. So
Speaker 1: the President Trump delivers White House address about the Iran War.
Speaker 1: Let's listen into on this one together, y'all.
Speaker 9: Time discussions are ongoing. Regime change was not our goal.
Speaker 9: We never said regime change. But regime change has occurred
Speaker 9: because of all of their original leader's death. They're all dead.
Speaker 9: The new group is less radical and much more reasonable. Yet,
Speaker 9: if during this period of time no deal is made,
Speaker 9: we have our eyes or key targets. If there is
Speaker 9: no deal, we are going to hit each and every
Speaker 9: one of their electric generating plants very hard, and probably simultaneously.
Speaker 1: We have not hit their oil, even though.
Speaker 9: That's the easiest target of all because it would not
Speaker 9: give them even a small chance of survival or rebuilding.
Speaker 9: But we could hit it and it would be gone,
Speaker 9: and there is not a thing they could do about it.
Speaker 9: They have no anti aircraft equipment, their radar is one
Speaker 9: hundred percent annihilated. We are unstoppable as a military force.
Speaker 9: The nuclear sites that we obliterated with the B two
Speaker 9: bombers have been hit so hard that it would take
Speaker 9: months to get near the nuclear dust, and we have
Speaker 9: it under intense satellite surveillance and control. If we see
Speaker 9: them make a move, even a move for it, will
Speaker 9: hit them with missiles very hard. Again, we have all
Speaker 9: the cards.
Speaker 1: They have done.
Speaker 9: It's very important that we keep.
Speaker 1: Okay, so just throwing it out here, he's correct. They
Speaker 1: have no way of stopping anything in the air. We
Speaker 1: own the skies, We own pretty much every aspect of
Speaker 1: their defensive posture right now, right and the way we
Speaker 1: know that not just oh, you can't trust with the
Speaker 1: talking heads are saying, okay, and I hear that. I
Speaker 1: fully get that we are currently using eight teen warthogs
Speaker 1: over them. For those that don't know, this is a
Speaker 1: plane that was built around a gun, okay, and it
Speaker 1: is extremely slowly flying. It comes in low and slow.
Speaker 1: The only way that we would be able to utilize
Speaker 1: this air platform is if they have no way of
Speaker 1: shooting it down. They have no way of shooting it down.
Speaker 1: They have no way of really defending themselves for anything
Speaker 1: at this point, which is why I don't believe that
Speaker 1: we're gonna be doing some sort of a land invasion.
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe one or two strategic spots around the Straight
Speaker 1: of Horn moves maybe, uh, but that's It's not like
Speaker 1: we're gonna be invading mainland Iran. We're not gonna be
Speaker 1: trying to take the Tehran, they're a capital city and
Speaker 1: all the like. No, we're not gonna do that. I
Speaker 1: truly don't believe that we even have that in the cards.
Speaker 1: But also there's a report that we're gonna play next
Speaker 1: of the Cheshnian forces that are ready to fight for Iran.
Speaker 1: If the US invades, we'll get to that one in
Speaker 1: a minute, because I really don't want CHESH needs to
Speaker 1: get involved. There are some extremely capable fighters, but uh,
Speaker 1: all right, before I read this article and then play
Speaker 1: another thing about Trump sandwich, you.
Speaker 5: Got it might be the million in me, but the
Speaker 5: A ten wag is a phenomenal platform and the sound
Speaker 5: of it.
Speaker 1: They keep trying to get rid of it though it's insane.
Speaker 5: They no, it's perfect for killing tanks. I think I'm
Speaker 5: pretty sure he killed a fucking naval vessel.
Speaker 1: At this point, they they have been trying to get
Speaker 1: it to be, you know, just taken off since like
Speaker 1: eighty two.
Speaker 6: They can fuck off that thing. That grandpap off will
Speaker 6: live forever.
Speaker 1: There's no reason for them too except oh, it's expensive,
Speaker 1: it's slow, it's this, it's this, And then some new
Speaker 1: conflict kicks off and it becomes a vital piece of
Speaker 1: equipment and they're like, okay, maybe we can keep it
Speaker 1: for a little while longer, but give it another few
Speaker 1: years and they'll try to disband it as well, and
Speaker 1: it's like, just stop. For the politicians that have never served,
Speaker 1: and the politicians that don't know how warfighting is done,
Speaker 1: don't speak on war fighting matters. That's just my take,
Speaker 1: but anyone, Yeah, the eights.
Speaker 5: Inside, but that like it goes eighteen go Bert and
Speaker 5: it makes me smile.
Speaker 1: It does, indeed, it does. Indeed. So now let's talk
Speaker 1: about this Trump speech tonight. President Trump says that the
Speaker 1: US will completely military operation in Iran very shortly. They
Speaker 1: were talking about how they're going to be done with
Speaker 1: it very soon. President Trump addressed the national Wednesday evening
Speaker 1: to provide justification for the war in Iran and indicate
Speaker 1: that the US is nearing completion of its objectives. Direct quote,
Speaker 1: we are on track to complete all of America's military
Speaker 1: objectives shortly, very shortly, the president said. Trump did not
Speaker 1: provide specific details of an exit from the conflict, but
Speaker 1: he said the US would hit Iran extremely hard over
Speaker 1: the next two or three weeks. After the conflict is over.
Speaker 1: Trump said that the straight of horn moves will open
Speaker 1: up naturally once they demine it. Trump's speech comes as
Speaker 1: a market as markets are highly sensitive to developments in
Speaker 1: the Middle East, where the war has impacted oil prices
Speaker 1: and a variety of assets. The war has also drastically
Speaker 1: reshaped expectations for inflation, economic growth, and the Federal Reserve's
Speaker 1: interest rate policy this year. Funny how that works. Somehow
Speaker 1: iron has everything to do with American interest rates. That's
Speaker 1: the dumbest shit ever heard in my life. But okay.
Speaker 1: Over the past two days, markets have railed on growing
Speaker 1: optimism that the war may end soon. Oil prices have
Speaker 1: hailed at or above one hundred dollars per barrel, and
Speaker 1: the US average gas price has cossed four dollars per
Speaker 1: gallon as the war enters its fifth week. So Trump
Speaker 1: said that the US is totally independent of the Middle East,
Speaker 1: he's overlooked overlooking key goods and how global energy markets work.
Speaker 1: And Wednesday Nights, addressed to the nation, President Trump declared,
Speaker 1: we are now totally independent of the Middle East, and
Speaker 1: yet we are there to help. We don't have to
Speaker 1: be there. We don't need their oil, we don't need
Speaker 1: anything they have. These sentiments, which Trump has expressed many
Speaker 1: times in recent weeks, are a window into his worldview
Speaker 1: and how he hopes to make a clean exit from
Speaker 1: the war in Iran. But the assertions overlook key goods
Speaker 1: that come from the region and global energy interdependence, which
Speaker 1: anyone who has filled up a gas tank in the
Speaker 1: last month is all too aware of. Trump is correct
Speaker 1: that the US doesn't quote unquote need oil from the region,
Speaker 1: as the US is a net exporter of both crude
Speaker 1: oil and natural gas, but the global nature of these
Speaker 1: markets means that a shortage means rising prices, not just
Speaker 1: in Asia, where most of the oil that passes through
Speaker 1: the Straighth Hormones is actually sent, but around the world
Speaker 1: and in the US. Americans, for example, are now paying
Speaker 1: more than four dollars for a gallon of gasoline on average,
Speaker 1: according to the American Automobile Association, a jump of more
Speaker 1: than a dollar since the hostilities began. Trump is also
Speaker 1: overlooking that while the US is a net exporter of
Speaker 1: crude it remains an importer of refined gasoline in many regions,
Speaker 1: which still blows my fucking mind. We have the facilities,
Speaker 1: we can refine our own gas. Why do we rely
Speaker 1: on importing that shit? I'll never understand. The President is
Speaker 1: also factually wrong on other key goods that pass through
Speaker 1: the Strait and whose absence has been felt directly in
Speaker 1: the US. Helium and fertilizer are two notable products made
Speaker 1: in high quantities in the region and relied on by
Speaker 1: an array of American industries. Helium is a key production
Speaker 1: of semiconductors economics. Andreas Sento Larsen, founder of Steno Research,
Speaker 1: recently told Y'a, who financed that the stoppage could potentially
Speaker 1: turn into a bottleneck for the entire AI story. So
Speaker 1: somehow I didn't know this helium is key in the
Speaker 1: production of semiconductors. So are we saying that this situation
Speaker 1: in Iran is also stopping the growth of AI, Because
Speaker 1: if so, I could be real in favor of this,
Speaker 1: like real fucking quick. I'm just saying anyway. Trump says
Speaker 1: the US will not let Golf states get hurt or
Speaker 1: fail in any way, shape or form. During his address
Speaker 1: to the Nation Wednesday night, President Trump said the US
Speaker 1: would not let the Gulf state nations, including allies like
Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia and the UAE, get hurt or fail in
Speaker 1: any way, shape or form. Through the four weeks of
Speaker 1: conflicts since the US and Israel launched air strikes against Iran,
Speaker 1: Iran has increasingly lashed out at the wider Golf region,
Speaker 1: damaging critical energy infrastructure throughout the Middle East. In Qatar,
Speaker 1: state run Qatar Energy Ross Laffen LNG Export Terminal, the
Speaker 1: largest such terminal in the world, has declared force majure.
Speaker 1: Pretty sure mispronounced the word, but it's okay on shipments
Speaker 1: after the facility suffered sustained damage and flows through the
Speaker 1: straet or hor Moves have been shuttered. Refineries in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait,
Speaker 1: and Bahrain have shut units or suspended operations. Oil producers
Speaker 1: throughout the Golf have been forced to shut in millions
Speaker 1: of barrels per day in oil production as storage tanks
Speaker 1: have filled with nowhere to send the oil coming out
Speaker 1: on the ground. Airports, hotels, and other civilian infrastructure have
Speaker 1: also been struck throughout the major Golf capitals, including the
Speaker 1: global airline hub of Dubai. In the UAE, On Wednesday,
Speaker 1: the UAE signal that it is prepared to enter the
Speaker 1: conflict and call for a UN back coalition to reopen
Speaker 1: the straighter Horn Moves by force. There we go. If
Speaker 1: the UAE launches military action, it will mark the first
Speaker 1: time a Gulf state has gotten directly involved in the war.
Speaker 1: All right, So let's listen into what Trump said about
Speaker 1: the rest of this conversation.
Speaker 9: In perspective American involvement in world War One lasted one year,
Speaker 9: seven months and five days. World War two lasted for
Speaker 9: three years, eight months and twenty five days. The Korean
Speaker 9: War lasted for three years, one month, and two days.
Speaker 9: The Vietnam War lasted for nineteen years, five months, and
Speaker 9: twenty nine days. Iraq went on for eight years, eight
Speaker 9: months and twenty eight days. We are in this military operation,
Speaker 9: so powerful, so brilliant, against one of the most powerful
Speaker 9: countries for thirty two days, and the country has been
Speaker 9: eviscerated and essentially is really no longer a threat. They
Speaker 9: were the bully of the Middle East, but they're the
Speaker 9: bully no longer. This is a true investment in your
Speaker 9: children and your grandchildren's future. The whole world is watching
Speaker 9: and they can't leave the power, strength, and brilliants. They
Speaker 9: just can't believe what they're seeing. They leave it to
Speaker 9: your imagination, but they can't believe what they're seeing the
Speaker 9: brilliance of the United States military. Tonight, every American can
Speaker 9: look forward to a day when we are finally free
Speaker 9: from the wickedness of Iranian aggression and the specter of
Speaker 9: nuclear black mail. Because of the actions we have taken,
Speaker 9: we are on the cusp of ending Iran sinister threat
Speaker 9: to America and the world, and I'll tell you the
Speaker 9: world is watching. And when we do, when it's all over,
Speaker 9: the United States will be safer, stronger, more prosperous, and
Speaker 9: greater than it has ever been before. May God bless
Speaker 9: the men and women of the United States Armed Forces,
Speaker 9: and may God bless the United States of America. Think.
Speaker 1: Okay, so he is still on the claim that this
Speaker 1: is to prevent a nuclear war. Keep in mind that
Speaker 1: even Iran's closest homies, their closest allies, have said for
Speaker 1: years that Iran does not need to get a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 1: So as far as them getting support for their goals,
Speaker 1: Russia's not coming to aid them on this one. China's
Speaker 1: not aiding them on this one. North Korea maybe, but
Speaker 1: even still North Korea is kind of doing their isolation
Speaker 1: this thing. As far as Iran's concerned. I don't believe
Speaker 1: as of this moment that any country is going to
Speaker 1: be super jazzed about Iran developing some sort of a
Speaker 1: nuclear weapons. So most countries, even though they're not happy
Speaker 1: about what's going down, they're probably relieved that Iran's nuclear
Speaker 1: capabilities have been kicked down The road even further. Now,
Speaker 1: real quick, I did want to play this video talking
Speaker 1: about how the Cheschnians might get involved if American troops invade. Well,
Speaker 1: all right, as if American troops get involved in a
Speaker 1: ground invasion of Iran. The Cheschnians have weighed in and
Speaker 1: said that they will absolutely send the forces their way.
Speaker 1: Let's learn about this one together.
Speaker 8: Iranian stite media is now claiming that combat units from
Speaker 8: Russia's Chechen Republic have declared themselves ready to deploy to
Speaker 8: Iran if the United States launches a ground invasion. According
Speaker 8: to Press TV, these forces are loyal to Chechen leader
Speaker 8: Ramzan Kadirov and have told Tehran they will fight alongside
Speaker 8: the Iranian armed forces if U S troops move beyond
Speaker 8: air and missile strikes onto Iranian soil.
Speaker 4: The reports describe the.
Speaker 8: Ongoing US Israeli war against Iran as a religious war,
Speaker 8: and say the Chechen side is framing any direct intervention
Speaker 8: as a jihad, a battle of good versus evil in
Speaker 8: defense of the Islamic Republic. These claims surface just as
Speaker 8: US officials openly discuss limited ground raids inside Iran, including
Speaker 8: possible assaults on Khag Island and coastal sites near the
Speaker 8: Strait of Hormus. Iran's top military command has responded with
Speaker 8: its own rhetoric, vowing to cut off the legs of
Speaker 8: any aggressor who tries to set foot on Iranian territory
Speaker 8: and insisting the country is waiting for a ground invasion
Speaker 8: to prove it can destroy invading forces. Iranian outlets say
Speaker 8: more than a million fighters, a mix of regular troops,
Speaker 8: revolutionary guard units, and Basi volunteers have been mobilized nationwide,
Speaker 8: while new reinforcements and air defense systems are being dug
Speaker 8: in along key fronts. Against that backdrop, talk of Chechen
Speaker 8: reinforcements is meant to signal that any US move on
Speaker 8: the ground might not just pit Washington against Tehran, but
Speaker 8: risk pulling in Russian aligned fighters as well. Chechen commander
Speaker 8: Abdi Alaudinov, whose Arkmart units have been fighting in Ukraine,
Speaker 8: has already said publicly that his men are waiting for
Speaker 8: an order from Vladimir Putin to confront US forces if
Speaker 8: war spills into Iran. Iranian and sympathetic media are now
Speaker 8: amplifying those statements to suggest that the same Chechen formations
Speaker 8: used as shock troops in Ukraine could appear on a
Speaker 8: new front in the Gulf, blurring the line between the
Speaker 8: Ukraine War and the Irani conflict. For now, there is
Speaker 8: no independent confirmation that any Chechen units are actually moving
Speaker 8: toward Iran, but the messaging alone feeds a narrative in
Speaker 8: Tehran that if the US crosses the threshold into a
Speaker 8: ground invasion, it could find itself facing not just Iran's
Speaker 8: own forces, but foreign fighters who see the fighters part
Speaker 8: of a wider gihard against American power.
Speaker 1: Okay, so everybody who doesn't know, Chashnia is a region
Speaker 1: within Russia. However, they operate as an independent state from Russia,
Speaker 1: but still under the umbrella of Russia. I don't believe
Speaker 1: that Putin is going to green light Chesshnian units to
Speaker 1: go into Iran. That being said, dot dot dot Chashnian
Speaker 1: fighters were in Afghana to stand taking turns, taking basically
Speaker 1: training missions against US troops. That wasn't approved by Putin either.
Speaker 1: What I could see is Russia giving some Cheshnian units
Speaker 1: furloughs and them going on their own as independent human
Speaker 1: beings to Iran to do jihad things. I could see
Speaker 1: that one hundred percent, I don't think Putin's gonna green
Speaker 1: light that as far as that goes. But then also
Speaker 1: the other side of that, if he's willing to lose
Speaker 1: man power that he could otherwise use in Ukraine, which
Speaker 1: he needs, then I don't I see what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: They may have guys that like abandon their post quote unquote,
Speaker 1: but they're not going to be reprimanded for it by
Speaker 1: their local chain of command to go and help Iran.
Speaker 1: Maybe I don't believe that there's going to be any
Speaker 1: Cheshnian deployments anyway, but I guess we shall see as
Speaker 1: time progresses. So right here we have the live Artemis
Speaker 1: two launch day update, and this I'm not going to
Speaker 1: read this, but it basically gives a minute to minute
Speaker 1: breakdown of the events that took place all the way
Speaker 1: through their systems checks. It starts off at like four
Speaker 1: point thirty pm, and it goes on and ends at
Speaker 1: five point fifty nine pm, when the Orion spacecraft's solar
Speaker 1: array wings have fully deployed, completing a key configuration step
Speaker 1: for the Artemis two mission. Flight controllers in Houston confirmed
Speaker 1: that all four wings unfolded as planned, locking into place
Speaker 1: and beginning to draw power. Each solar array wing extends
Speaker 1: outward from the European service module, giving o'riyen named Integrity,
Speaker 1: a wing span of roughly sixty three feet. When fully deployed,
Speaker 1: each wing has fifteen thousand solar cells to convert sunlight
Speaker 1: to electricity. The arrays can turn on two axes that
Speaker 1: allow them to rotate and track the sun, maximizing power
Speaker 1: generation as the spacecraft changes altitude during its time on
Speaker 1: Earth in Earth orbit rather and its outbound journey to
Speaker 1: the Moon. So anyway, all right, I do want to
Speaker 1: play a video a time to talk more about. It's
Speaker 1: a quick clip, a little short of Artemis two's lift
Speaker 1: off on historic Moon mission. Let's wash this together.
Speaker 7: Nine eight seven rs twenty five inches but four three
Speaker 7: two one booster, ignition and lift off. Artemis two now
Speaker 7: bound for the Moon, Humanity's next great voyage begins.
Speaker 1: That's fucking wild.
Speaker 6: Roger right Pitch.
Speaker 5: Houston now controlling the flight of Integrity on the Artemist
Speaker 5: two mission.
Speaker 1: Round ten. I listen, I understand that some people think
Speaker 1: space is faking gay. I think that shit's cool as hell, honestly,
Speaker 1: But anyway, uh so, Artemis two launches on historic mission
Speaker 1: around the Moon. Uh, let's talk about it a little
Speaker 1: bit more in depth here. So, uh, just the kind
Speaker 1: of the key latest thing. So the arm was two
Speaker 1: begins this journey. Four astronauts blasted off from Kennedy Space
Speaker 1: Center in Florida this evening on a monumental ten day
Speaker 1: mission to circumnavigate the Moon. Yeah, they're gonna be checking
Speaker 1: out the dark side of the Moon. About the astronauts
Speaker 1: on board. The mission crew includes NASA's Reed Weissman, Victor Glover,
Speaker 1: and Christina Koch, along with the Canadian Space Agencies Jeremy Hanson.
Speaker 1: What comes next? While the astronauts settle in, they are
Speaker 1: troubleshooting toilet issues. Yeah. Meanwhile, NASA's chief Jared Isaacman defined
Speaker 1: mission success at an evening press briefing. Why this mission matters.
Speaker 1: The historic and risky lunar venture will mark the first
Speaker 1: time astronauts return to the vicinity of the Moon in
Speaker 1: more than fifty years. The mission could travel further from
Speaker 1: Earth than any human ever has, breaking the Apollo program's
Speaker 1: distance record. I did want to bring up the Moon thing,
Speaker 1: although worth mentioning. Carney celebrated the first Canadian to go
Speaker 1: to them on a Moon mission, of course he did.
Speaker 1: Now NASA is looking into an issue with the toilet.
Speaker 1: So this is a mock up right now on screen
Speaker 1: of the toilet aboard the Orion spacecraft. That's a weird
Speaker 1: poop shoot, dude, that's a weird thing to sit on.
Speaker 1: But all right, whatever the unfortunate realities of space flight.
Speaker 1: During a news briefing after the launch, a Mitt chastrea,
Speaker 1: I don't know how to pronounce that. There's way too
Speaker 1: many consonants and not of vows in homies name, NASA's
Speaker 1: associate administrator said that the mission controllers are tracking a
Speaker 1: couple minor issues, including one with the onboard toilet. We
Speaker 1: had a controller issue with the toilet when they spun
Speaker 1: it up, so we got to work through that. He said.
Speaker 1: That's gonna take maybe a few hours to troubleshoot. Well,
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't think they're gonna like unstrap and
Speaker 1: you know, go take a shit as of this moment,
Speaker 1: so I think they're okay with that anyway, All jokes aside,
Speaker 1: NASA has made it clear that this is a test
Speaker 1: mission and they're expecting to have to work through small
Speaker 1: hiccups with the crew comforts on board that have never
Speaker 1: been tested in space before, and it's not clear whether
Speaker 1: the problem affects the toilet functionality. Okay, NASA's chief Jared
Speaker 1: Isaacman can likely sympathize. During his first trip to space
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty one, the Space X capsule he flew
Speaker 1: on had a toilet problem. So, all, right, of all
Speaker 1: the things, it's not mission critical and I'm pretty sure
Speaker 1: they'll be able to fix whatever it is. But yeah,
Speaker 1: it's funny that that was the issue that's making headlines. Anyway.
Speaker 1: With all that being said, this is also something I
Speaker 1: thought was interesting. The Pope, the Blessed Holy Father, first
Speaker 1: American Pope, all the things from old Shyraq. He is
Speaker 1: summoning all of the bishops to Rome. Why let's learn
Speaker 1: about this together.
Speaker 10: Plio the fourteenth has officially summoned the presidents of every
Speaker 10: bishop's conference in the world to a high level summit
Speaker 10: in Rome this October. But why well to discuss Pope
Speaker 10: Francis's lightning rot of a document a morris Letitia, and
Speaker 10: how to best implement these teachings in the present. And
Speaker 10: this document is one of the most controversial elements of
Speaker 10: Pope Francis's legacy A morris Letitia, which means joy of Love,
Speaker 10: is primarily about marriage and family life. It talks about
Speaker 10: the beautiful chaos of the family living in the domestic
Speaker 10: church and how each family situation is unique. Now, the
Speaker 10: controversy stems from a footnote in chapter eight that suggested
Speaker 10: that in certain cases, people in irregular marriages, such as
Speaker 10: divorced and remarried Catholics, might be able to receive the
Speaker 10: sacrament of Holy Communion. Now this was controversial because this
Speaker 10: is the opposite of what the Church is always taught,
Speaker 10: and it was this little footnote that caused a wide
Speaker 10: variety of interpretations and implementations across the globe. In Argentina
Speaker 10: and Germany, the footnote was seen as a direct pastoral
Speaker 10: mandate to allow divorced and civilly remarried Catholics to receive
Speaker 10: the Eucharist after a period of spiritual discernment. However, in
Speaker 10: Poland and parts of Africa, the bishops argued that the
Speaker 10: footnote did not and could not change two thousand years
Speaker 10: of Church law. So I think this upcoming summit of
Speaker 10: the Vatican is a good thing because the Church cannot
Speaker 10: properly operate amidst doctrinal ambiguity, and hopefully this group can
Speaker 10: finally settle this confusion. Let me know what you think
Speaker 10: in the comments.
Speaker 1: So when they're talking about irregular marriages, I am happy
Speaker 1: that he at least gave the distinction between you know,
Speaker 1: divorced and remarried people, because I sure thought, especially being
Speaker 1: Pope Francis, that that was going to go towards the
Speaker 1: homosexual agenda. And you know, just like they're saying, you
Speaker 1: can't undo two thousand years worth of tradition because you
Speaker 1: just feel like it unless you were to hold a
Speaker 1: conclave right like the Vatican one or the Vatican two.
Speaker 1: And I have been saying this for a while that
Speaker 1: I think that they're probably going to do a Vatican
Speaker 1: three sooner rather than later, and they may in turn
Speaker 1: change up some of the more doctrinal practices of the
Speaker 1: Holy See. I don't know to what level, into what
Speaker 1: degree they do take their sacraments extremely serious. They take
Speaker 1: the Eucharist like that's one of their big things. Not
Speaker 1: to make a joke about how it's their bread and butter,
Speaker 1: it's their bread and wine. But at the same time, no,
Speaker 1: they legitimately take this as the physical body, in the
Speaker 1: physical blood of Christ. And so when there's a law
Speaker 1: that's been on the books forever to say that you
Speaker 1: cannot take the sacraments if you've done dot dot, they
Speaker 1: fucking mean that. That's not like, oh really, it's more
Speaker 1: like a guideline. No, that's a rule rule, like the
Speaker 1: priest who gives the sacrament to somebody of that type
Speaker 1: knowingly that this person is divorced or whatever, they're in
Speaker 1: trouble with God kind of thing. So I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't know if what's gonna come out of this,
Speaker 1: but I do believe that we're probably gonna be seeing
Speaker 1: a Vatican three happen. I wouldn't be surprised if we
Speaker 1: see it before, like twenty thirty five, sometime between now
Speaker 1: and then. So anyway, that's pretty much all I got
Speaker 1: for this episode of The Cajun Night Live, y'all, honestly,
Speaker 1: unless you actually know it before we get out of here.
Speaker 1: I did want to check the chat see if there
Speaker 1: was anything that was really interesting that I was dropped
Speaker 1: in here. Tony dropped some stuff earlier on, but he's
Speaker 1: not here to quantify or speak on it, so I
Speaker 1: don't want to really get into that one. Let's learn
Speaker 1: how to tie Oh Jesus Christ. Sam. Also, he kind
Speaker 1: of dipped out, so I'm not going to bring that
Speaker 1: one up here. Let's see, I'm doubtful Russia only has
Speaker 1: something like ten satellites going over run. We talked about
Speaker 1: that one little European Texas aka Poland absolutely, Mike. Oh shit,
Speaker 1: Tony's kid is sick. That's why I had to take care.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I know. I will definitely keep your child
Speaker 1: in my prayers on this evening. Brother Northwood Candy rejected
Speaker 1: it rightfully. Tony brought that one up, which is very true.
Speaker 1: Would World War two be the Napoleonic Wars? Personally, I
Speaker 1: think that would be World War One. We're gonna be honest,
Speaker 1: but you know, all the things, all the stuff. So yeah,
Speaker 1: that's pretty much all we got to talk about on
Speaker 1: this episode. Y'all. I want to thank everybody for joining
Speaker 1: me this evening on the Cajun Night Live and for
Speaker 1: all the people listening to this on Thursday and whatever
Speaker 1: day you end up watching or listening to this, if
Speaker 1: you would like to join us every Wednesday night at
Speaker 1: nine pm Central, then what you need to do is
Speaker 1: go to patreon dot com slash Cajun Night. That's the
Speaker 1: only place to get these shows. Well, I've never done
Speaker 1: this on the Cajun Night, but why not. It's also
Speaker 1: the only place to get these shows completely. I might
Speaker 1: as well throw it in there. Why the fuck not?
Speaker 1: Why the fuck not? But it is also the only
Speaker 1: place to not only get the show's commercial free, but
Speaker 1: it's the only place to see what we're talking about here.
Speaker 1: These episodes do not get posted on the cult conspiracy Patreon.
Speaker 1: They only get posted on the Cajun Night Patreon. Go
Speaker 1: check it out linked the description. There is only one
Speaker 1: tier for entry. There is only one tier. Ain't nobody
Speaker 1: trying to get rich off of this? We are trying
Speaker 1: to grow this into an information sharing group that meets
Speaker 1: once a week to talk about geopolitics, some history, sometimes religion,
Speaker 1: all the things and all the stuff. With all this
Speaker 1: being said, once again, everybody, thank y'all for joining me
Speaker 1: this evening. I am the Cajun Night and as always,
Speaker 1: God bless