Speaker 1: FBI concluded Jeffrey Epstein wasn't running a sex trafficking ring
Speaker 1: for powerful men file show.
Speaker 2: So there you go. The AP is the AP reporting
Speaker 2: it today. I thought it was two thousand and five.
Speaker 2: That's the gas ltius, gas light and shit I've ever
Speaker 2: heard in my life. Well, he did work for an
Speaker 2: intelligence agency, so could you resolve whether or not he did?
Speaker 3: And also could you say why there was a minute
Speaker 3: missing from the jail house team?
Speaker 4: Did?
Speaker 5: I just said you?
Speaker 6: Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?
Speaker 1: This guy's been talked about for years.
Speaker 6: Are people still talking about this guy, this creep that
Speaker 6: is unbelievable?
Speaker 2: Are you still talking about Epstein? Yeah? Yeah, we are,
Speaker 2: and I'm glad we are because thanks to the incredible
Speaker 2: work of Thomas Massey, Rocanna, and a handful of others,
Speaker 2: we now have real hard evidence of how the sausage
Speaker 2: of the deep state is made, and unfortunate for Cash Pattel,
Speaker 2: we now have pretty damn solid evidence that he perjured
Speaker 2: himself in September of twenty twenty five, just five months ago,
Speaker 2: when he said.
Speaker 7: This is no credible information none. If there were, I
Speaker 7: would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals,
Speaker 7: and the information we have again is limited. So the
Speaker 7: answer is no one for the information that we have
Speaker 7: and the files in the case file.
Speaker 2: Okay, And why do we know that that was perjury? Well,
Speaker 2: because Thomas Massey late last night was going through the
Speaker 2: files because they were finally permitted, they allowed congressional representatives
Speaker 2: to go into I assume it was a skiff. I
Speaker 2: don't know exactly, but they go into the room with
Speaker 2: all of the millions of files, unredacted files, and what
Speaker 2: Massi and Kanna found out was that, in fact, the
Speaker 2: dojay's version of the documents still had redactions because they
Speaker 2: had not required the FBI to unredact their files before
Speaker 2: handing them over to the DJ.
Speaker 4: I'm asking you, in that stuff, there's nothing that's related
Speaker 4: to any other sex traffic any other people engaged with
Speaker 4: Epstein in underage Set's correct and my knowledge, No.
Speaker 8: Given what you saw today, does that testimony ring true
Speaker 8: to you? Still?
Speaker 4: No?
Speaker 9: The FBI's own documents from twenty nineteen list Leslie Wexner
Speaker 9: as a co conspirator and a child sex trafficking case,
Speaker 9: so you know they've got some explaining to do.
Speaker 1: Does that mean you think Cash Fattel perjured himself.
Speaker 3: You know, I thought when he said that, maybe he
Speaker 3: what he's the trick he's using in his mind is
Speaker 3: that well he's considering it prostitution, and maybe what they
Speaker 3: have as evidence of sex trafficking.
Speaker 6: Of people who weren't minors.
Speaker 3: But what we see tonight is the charge.
Speaker 9: That Lex Wesner Wexner was a co conspirator to was
Speaker 9: child sex trafficking. And it's on the FBI's own documents
Speaker 9: from twenty nineteen.
Speaker 2: So you're saying that should be investigated.
Speaker 9: Basically absolutely be investigated.
Speaker 2: So Massy hopped over to CNN and he dragged Pam
Speaker 2: Bondi in the DOJ and Cashptel in the FBI, and
Speaker 2: he pressured them on X to disclose and unredact those names,
Speaker 2: which they did. And what we found out is that
Speaker 2: there are in fact multiple co conspirators and specifically explicitly
Speaker 2: co conspirators in child trafficking, which is the exact question
Speaker 2: that was asked of Cash Patel in September of twenty
Speaker 2: twenty five. And one of those names is a name
Speaker 2: that's very familiar to anybody who's been following this case
Speaker 2: for years like I have and I'm sure most of
Speaker 2: you have, is that Les Wexner was listed as a
Speaker 2: co conspirator in child trafficking. Now does that mean he's guilty. No,
Speaker 2: it doesn't mean he's guilty, but it does mean that
Speaker 2: there was an FBI document that had Les Wester's name
Speaker 2: on it listing him as a co conspirator in child trafficking,
Speaker 2: which means that cash battel by the letter of the
Speaker 2: law is best I can tell, clearly perjured himself. Oh god,
Speaker 2: what does that mean?
Speaker 8: This is from June sixth, twenty eleven, from Tom Pritzker
Speaker 8: of the billionaire Pritzker family, one of the richest families
Speaker 8: in the world, to Jeffrey Epstein. I am in a
Speaker 8: remote valley of Afghanistan, and then in parentheses it's my
Speaker 8: birthday wish.
Speaker 2: With boys with toys.
Speaker 8: I want to believe that that means what I think
Speaker 8: it means, but we all know it's been well documented
Speaker 8: in this studio by our friends who are Tier one
Speaker 8: operators in Afghanistan. What goes on in Afghanistan as it
Speaker 8: relates to young boys.
Speaker 2: Oh dude, these people are just saying it on email,
Speaker 2: and I got to take a minute just to rip
Speaker 2: all of the Massy haters right now, because they're driving
Speaker 2: me out of my fucking mind. I cannot believe how
Speaker 2: stupid people are. You've got basically one guy on the
Speaker 2: GOP side, especially now MTG's left office, that's really, really,
Speaker 2: really fighting for the American people and fighting for justice
Speaker 2: when it comes to these very very significant, if not
Speaker 2: existential matters. And you have this incredible pr campaign, what
Speaker 2: I consider a propaganda push by Laura Lumer and a
Speaker 2: bunch of others in my opinion, being paid to attack
Speaker 2: Thomas Massey, to constantly basically project all of his accusations
Speaker 2: about the Trump administration or the DOJ or the FBI,
Speaker 2: and then to project it onto Thomas Massey. They're constantly
Speaker 2: critiquing him saying, why won't he just say the names?
Speaker 2: If he's seen the names, why won't you say the names? Well,
Speaker 2: first off, because if he doesn't say it on the
Speaker 2: Congressional House floor, the girls that he uses as his
Speaker 2: witness to name those names can still be sued and
Speaker 2: hunted down by the wealthy billionaires that he's making these
Speaker 2: allegations against. So really the only safe avenue he has
Speaker 2: is to run a pr campaign against the DOJ and
Speaker 2: to force the DOJ and the FBI to unredact and
Speaker 2: to name these names so that these girls testimony can
Speaker 2: then be in the public. I The other critique that
Speaker 2: Massey often gets is that, oh, why is he going
Speaker 2: on to CNN? It's enemy territory. The reason he goes
Speaker 2: to CNN is because Fox News won't have him. Fox
Speaker 2: News will not have Thomas Massey on their shows. This
Speaker 2: is one of the most favored tools used to smear
Speaker 2: dissidence from the GOP. Smear merchants. They do the same
Speaker 2: thing with MTG. They go, oh, she's going on the View.
Speaker 2: Thomas Massey goes to CNN. The only reason that these
Speaker 2: people do those shows is because they've been blacklisted thanks
Speaker 2: to the Trump administration and thanks to their relationship with
Speaker 2: Fox News. So you can't then point at them and go, well,
Speaker 2: how dare they not go spread this message on Fox News?
Speaker 2: They can't. They cannot, and you know why. And the
Speaker 2: other thing that's making me pull my hair out, if
Speaker 2: I had any hair left to pull out, would be
Speaker 2: the fact that Thomas Massey is like the number one
Speaker 2: guy in the GOP who's pushing for all of the
Speaker 2: things that MAGA explicitly voted for, cutting the budget, balancing
Speaker 2: the budget, ending the wars, and the warfare state. He
Speaker 2: supports COVID justice, he supports Epstein justice, he supports building
Speaker 2: the wall, he supports deportations. There's like no daylight between
Speaker 2: you guys and him. The only reason that there's daylight
Speaker 2: is because Trump has abandoned ninety percent of those policies.
Speaker 2: And yet you stand by Trump well demonizing Massey, the
Speaker 2: one guy who's actually serious about following through on the
Speaker 2: entire MAGA portfolio. The fuck is wrong with you? Instead,
Speaker 2: you stand by Trump as Trump stands by Lutnik.
Speaker 10: I think you understand the root of concern here. It's
Speaker 10: the way you described very emphatically your first encounter with
Speaker 10: him in his apartment, said you were disgusted, would never
Speaker 10: have any contact with him again. Did you in fact
Speaker 10: make the visit to Jeffrey Epstein's private island.
Speaker 6: I did have lunch with him as I was on
Speaker 6: a boat going across on a family vacation. My wife
Speaker 6: was with me, as were my four children and nanny's
Speaker 6: I had another couple they were there as well with
Speaker 6: their children, and we had lunch on the island. That
Speaker 6: is true for an hour, and we left with all
Speaker 6: of my children, with my nannies and my wife all together.
Speaker 6: We were on family vacation. We were not a part
Speaker 6: to suggest there was anything untoured about that in twenty twelve,
Speaker 6: I don't recall why we did it.
Speaker 10: But miss Secretary.
Speaker 2: So that's Howard Lutnik under oath in front of the
Speaker 2: Senate today, being questioned by Senator Van Holland. Let's hear
Speaker 2: what Howard Lutnik had to say when he wasn't under oath,
Speaker 2: talking to the New York Post less than a year
Speaker 2: ago about this same exact issue.
Speaker 6: He opens the doors and there's a massage table in
Speaker 6: the middle of the room and candles all around and stuff.
Speaker 6: So I asked very insightful cutting questions. I say to him,
Speaker 6: massage table in the middle your house? How often you
Speaker 6: have a massage? And he says every day? And then
Speaker 6: he like gets like weirdly close to me and he says,
Speaker 6: and the right kind of massage. Oh, now my wife
Speaker 6: is standing here, so she looks at me and I
Speaker 6: look at her, and we say, I'm sorry, we have
Speaker 6: to go my wife. And I decided that I will
Speaker 6: never be in the room with that disgusting person ever again.
Speaker 6: So I was never in the room with him socially
Speaker 6: for business or for even philanthropy. If that guy was there,
Speaker 6: I wasn't going because he's gross.
Speaker 2: It doesn't get much more red handed than that, folks.
Speaker 2: I mean, this guy is on the record on Mike
Speaker 2: on camera talking to a journalist overtly lyne, and less
Speaker 2: than a year later, he's admitting that seven full years
Speaker 2: later he still maintained a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. There's
Speaker 2: additional reporting that Howard had business dealings with Jeffrey Epstein too.
Speaker 2: So this guy that he allegedly was a neighbor, I mean,
Speaker 2: factually was a neighbor with He lived Tudors down in
Speaker 2: New York from Epstein for years. He met him one time,
Speaker 2: according to Howard Lutnik, and he immediately recognized that the
Speaker 2: guy was gross because he had a massage table in
Speaker 2: his living room and he described the types of massages
Speaker 2: that he would get, and he and his wife immediately
Speaker 2: recognized this guy was a creep and he was gross,
Speaker 2: and he had nothing to do with him ever. Again.
Speaker 6: Yeah, that's my story a one and absolutely done right.
Speaker 11: So, I mean, that's an incredible story that you could
Speaker 11: pick up that he was a pervert.
Speaker 12: It's gross.
Speaker 6: The guy's gross, right with my wife and he's gross.
Speaker 6: The guy's gross. This was not the deep nuance of
Speaker 6: Howard Lutnik.
Speaker 11: This guy's gross, right, So how come Bill Gates and
Speaker 11: all these other people could hang around him and not
Speaker 11: see what you saw? Or did they see it and
Speaker 11: ignore it?
Speaker 4: Or no?
Speaker 6: They participated? Right, That's what his mo was, you know,
Speaker 6: get a massage, Get a massage. And what happened in
Speaker 6: that massage room I assume was on video. This guy
Speaker 6: was the greatest blackmailer ever.
Speaker 2: Except for doing business with him, except for going to
Speaker 2: his island with his family seven years later, except for
Speaker 2: doing fundraising events where he invited Jeffrey Epstein when he
Speaker 2: was fundraising on behalf of Hillary Clinton as she campaigned
Speaker 2: against Donald Trump, and Donald Trump stands beside Howard Lutnick
Speaker 2: as his commerce secretary, regardless secretary.
Speaker 13: Of what Nick today was testifying on the Hill and
Speaker 13: he said that he had visited Epstein's island in twenty
Speaker 13: twelve with his wife and children. And that's after he
Speaker 13: said that he had cut ties with Epstein and the
Speaker 13: Justice Department documents showed that he was in contact with
Speaker 13: Epstein three twenty eighteen over messages. So does the White
Speaker 13: House stand behind Secretary.
Speaker 11: Litnik right now?
Speaker 13: Secretary Loutnik remains a very important member of President Trump's team,
Speaker 13: and the President fully supports the secretary.
Speaker 2: And according to that journalists question there they alleged that
Speaker 2: Howard Lutnik had communications with Jeffrey Epstein up through twenty eighteen,
Speaker 2: when he was arrested and deceased a year later twenty nineteen.
Speaker 2: As I said, red handed, you don't get more guilty
Speaker 2: than that. Now you could say, okay, well, sure he
Speaker 2: lied about going to the island, but that doesn't prove anything.
Speaker 2: You're right, It doesn't doesn't prove that he did anything
Speaker 2: untoward with minors or prostitutes or anything like that. But
Speaker 2: what it does tell you is that this man is
Speaker 2: a pathological liar, pathological He lied egregiously for years about
Speaker 2: maintaining a relationship with Epstein for years. Why if he
Speaker 2: was doing nothing untoward, why hide it? Why hide it
Speaker 2: so aggressively? There are hundreds of high profile people who
Speaker 2: had a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein have to lie about
Speaker 2: that relationship, because no one, unless they're totally crazy, believes
Speaker 2: that everyone who had ever communicated with Jeffrey Epstein or
Speaker 2: gone to one of his meetups or anything like that
Speaker 2: or one of his parties even automatically means that you're
Speaker 2: a sexual predator. That's not what anyone believes. We believe
Speaker 2: that some of them were. And I'll tell you the
Speaker 2: ones that I really believe were are the ones who
Speaker 2: lied about it, the ones who continue to lie about it. Now,
Speaker 2: you may not be old enough to remember this testimony.
Speaker 2: I'm just barely old enough. But let's see if this
Speaker 2: is reminiscent for any of you old folks out there.
Speaker 6: I did not have any relationship with him.
Speaker 2: I did not have sexual relations with that woman. And
Speaker 2: think about how depraved we are as a nation or
Speaker 2: as a government at this point. That Bill Clinton had
Speaker 2: his reputation ruined because he lied about his sexual relationship
Speaker 2: with Monica Lewinsky. And now we have high profile intel ascids,
Speaker 2: sexual predators, and likely child traffickers that are having high
Speaker 2: level relationships with the highest level people in corporate America,
Speaker 2: corporate oligarchy all over the world, as well as our
Speaker 2: own government. And that's not enough to get people fired
Speaker 2: or have their careers ruined in America? Is that really
Speaker 2: where we're at? Bill Clinton's indiscretion was worse than this,
Speaker 2: I think not. But I'll tell you one thing I
Speaker 2: really like about this is that the energy from some
Speaker 2: of these congressional representatives, even the Democrats, which I despise,
Speaker 2: I like the tact that they're taking. I like the
Speaker 2: outrage and discussed, genuine discuss that some of them seem
Speaker 2: to be demonstrating after they were allowed to go in
Speaker 2: and see those fucking unredacted files. I just wanted to
Speaker 2: ask you.
Speaker 8: Have you ever a chance to review any of the
Speaker 8: unredacted files over at the DOJ, the Epstein files?
Speaker 12: I did?
Speaker 6: You did?
Speaker 4: Yeah, I just came from there.
Speaker 12: What can you tell us there's a bunch of sick fucks, and.
Speaker 10: I mean, anything more that we don't know.
Speaker 11: I feel like that's pretty well established.
Speaker 14: I know, I think.
Speaker 2: I think the part that is just so disgusting, Yeah,
Speaker 2: is that so many people knew that's representative balance out
Speaker 2: of Vermont, and ideologically politically we align on basically nothing,
Speaker 2: but when it comes to this, we're in aligne. We
Speaker 2: are dealing with some seriously sick fucking people. And I'm
Speaker 2: glad to say that there are a few Democrats, and yes,
Speaker 2: of course they're using it as a political football, and
Speaker 2: some of them are totally insincere, but regardless, use them
Speaker 2: for our ends, use them to pursue justice, use them
Speaker 2: to hunt down the deep state, use them to oust
Speaker 2: Pambondi cash Betel. I'm not telling you to become a
Speaker 2: Rocanna fan. I'm just telling you that his efforts right
Speaker 2: now benefit us tremendously, so I'm going to support him
Speaker 2: in the interim.
Speaker 14: Massey and I went to the Department of Justice to
Speaker 14: read the unredacted Epstein files. We spent about two hours
Speaker 14: there and we learned that seventy to eighty percent of
Speaker 14: the files are still redacted. In fact, there were six
Speaker 14: well the powerful men that the DOJ hid for no
Speaker 14: apparent reason. When Congressman Massey and I pointed this out
Speaker 14: to the Department of Justice, they acknowledge their mistake, and
Speaker 14: now they have revealed the identity of these six powerful men.
Speaker 14: These men are Salvator Novora, Zorab mikolads Leopig Leonor Nikola Kaputa,
Speaker 14: Sultan Ahmed bin Suliam, CEO of Dubaiports World and billionaire
Speaker 14: businessman Leslie Wexner.
Speaker 2: And that sultan guy that he referenced right there, it's
Speaker 2: alleged that he was the one who sent the email
Speaker 2: to Epstein saying loved the torture video. What so, according
Speaker 2: to Thomas Massy, he in fact sent a video of torture.
Speaker 2: Now I don't know the nature of that torture or
Speaker 2: the victim, but I do know that that's insane, and
Speaker 2: I don't know why these people aren't being prosecuted. But
Speaker 2: then you recognize that, oh it's a sultan, it's probably
Speaker 2: from an allied nation, and therefore, yeah, we're bearing it
Speaker 2: to benefit our geopolitical relationships, to the detriment of our
Speaker 2: domestic population, us, the Americans.
Speaker 1: I can hear the angst in your voice over the
Speaker 1: Epstein files. The reason people are bothered is because last
Speaker 1: year you said you'd cut off all contact, but there
Speaker 1: are eight instences of interaction in the files after two
Speaker 1: thousand and five. Just encourage you to be completely frank
Speaker 1: and open with everyone.
Speaker 2: Tell you what I think about it. I think personally
Speaker 2: that Howard Lutnick behaves as if he's a handler. He
Speaker 2: behaves as if he handles Donald Trump and Donald Trump's
Speaker 2: loyalty to him, despite the fact that Howard Lutnick demonstrated
Speaker 2: no loyalty to Trump, in fact funding his opposition Hillary
Speaker 2: Clinton as recently as twenty fifteen sixteen. It tells me
Speaker 2: that Howard Lutnick is a bigger time player than Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: Let me repeat that in case you didn't catch it.
Speaker 2: I'm saying that our current Commerce secretary is more high powered,
Speaker 2: connected and important than the current sitting president of the
Speaker 2: United States. That's the only conclusion that I could come to,
Speaker 2: because otherwise you immediately throw this guy overboard. And why
Speaker 2: do I think that, Well, because if Donald Trump was
Speaker 2: looking after his political future or his political legacy, obviously
Speaker 2: the thing that he would be doing is firing Howard Lutnik,
Speaker 2: firing Cash Patel, firing Pam Bondy. He should have fired
Speaker 2: Dan Bongino, but he quit. He should be supporting and
Speaker 2: endorsing Thomas Massey instead of backing a twenty plus million
Speaker 2: dollar GOP primary campaign against Thomas Massey. But he's not.
Speaker 2: He's not doing any of those things. And I would
Speaker 2: like for you to ask yourself, why why is Donald
Speaker 2: Trump actively overtly doing things that are counter to every
Speaker 2: everything he told you he stood for and stood by
Speaker 2: for a decade plus. And the answer, as best I
Speaker 2: can tell, is that he is compromised. He is compromised
Speaker 2: by our greatest ally to make it explicit, and the
Speaker 2: lut Nick non firing and the Epstein cover up, and
Speaker 2: the just broad based cover up of all of this
Speaker 2: from every layer of justice, while Donald Trump sits on
Speaker 2: his hands or worse, condemns the people who demand justice.
Speaker 2: Tells me everything I need to know that this is
Speaker 2: existential to him, because it is obviously massively damaging to
Speaker 2: his reputation and to his legacy and to him improving
Speaker 2: this country or improving the world. And yet he is
Speaker 2: unrelenting in his support of all of these people as
Speaker 2: they overtly actively lie to us and in my opinion,
Speaker 2: commit treason.
Speaker 15: Oh hi, Pam BONDI, what are you doing with Keith Frankel?
Speaker 15: I have a couple questions for you, Pam. How much
Speaker 15: are the acting lessons? Do the Epstein victims that you
Speaker 15: cried with know that you're friends with Keith Frankel? Why
Speaker 15: was Keith Frankel and Jeffrey Epstein talking about body boxes
Speaker 15: on February tenth, twenty ten. You've read the files, so
Speaker 15: I'm sure you can tell us if Jeffrey Epstein was
Speaker 15: such a monster, Pam, how come Keith went to his
Speaker 15: house so many times? One thing I was mentioned in
Speaker 15: the Epstein files is children being trafficked out of Ukraine.
Speaker 15: Keith Frankel and his family run a children's home that
Speaker 15: takes children out of Ukraine. You need to cut the shit, Pam.
Speaker 15: You need to cut the shit.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 2: Why do I say it's treason, Well, because I believe
Speaker 2: that they are actively lending aid to our enemies. They
Speaker 2: are actively subverting our government. They are actively undermining the
Speaker 2: will of the American people. They are actively pushing us
Speaker 2: towards wars with Iran, for instance, that do not benefit
Speaker 2: us or even really benefit us geopolitically either. And I'm
Speaker 2: not the only one feeling that way. Here's MTG.
Speaker 5: People are going to have to completely take in what
Speaker 5: they are seeing with their own eyes, what they're reading,
Speaker 5: and what they're being told. The reality is the Trump
Speaker 5: administration is not releasing the information, and I got you Look,
Speaker 5: I got yelled at by the President over this. This
Speaker 5: is why he called me a trader. He called me
Speaker 5: a trader because I would not take my name off
Speaker 5: the discharge petition, because I stood firmly and said, no,
Speaker 5: we are going to release the Epstein files. I'm standing
Speaker 5: with women who were raped as teenagers. I'm not standing
Speaker 5: with the government. I don't support I don't support the
Speaker 5: cover up of all of this stuff, whatever it may be.
Speaker 5: And the President got mad at me, and he's told me,
Speaker 5: and I've said this multiple times, he told me his
Speaker 5: friends would get hurt.
Speaker 2: The full disclosure of the Epstein files would hurt Donald
Speaker 2: Trump's friends. So now you have to ask yourself, who
Speaker 2: are Trump's friends. Then you have to look at his behavior,
Speaker 2: You have to look at all of the things he
Speaker 2: does to you. Politically. Is his primary consideration when it
Speaker 2: comes to geopolitics, it's what benefits Israel. What is his
Speaker 2: primary consideration when it comes to economics or really anything
Speaker 2: with this second term of his presidency seems to be
Speaker 2: whatever benefits Israel. So when he says it hurts his friends,
Speaker 2: who do you think he's talking about. And it's important
Speaker 2: to recognize that sixty to seventy percent of these files
Speaker 2: are still redacted. We know that there are over two
Speaker 2: million documents that have still yet to be released. We
Speaker 2: also found out today thanks to reporting that says that
Speaker 2: Donald Trump, well, his name was in the files fifty
Speaker 2: thousand times. In fact, ninety five percent of the times
Speaker 2: his name was in those files, they were redacted. They
Speaker 2: were not supposed to be. According to the congressional law
Speaker 2: from Connie and Conna and Massey, it was not legal
Speaker 2: to redact his name, and yet nine hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: thousand times Donald Trump's name was redacted from those files. Now,
Speaker 2: I've been very consistent on this. I don't have any
Speaker 2: reason to believe that Donald Trump did anything with anyone
Speaker 2: under age. There is no evidence to that end. But
Speaker 2: the real reality is this, this operation had an aspect
Speaker 2: of that. And unless I know the full truth, unless
Speaker 2: I have all of the documents unredacted, obviously not including
Speaker 2: anything that's illegal to see or anything that damages the victims,
Speaker 2: but rather everything else, which is what the congressional law
Speaker 2: says they are legally mandated to do, well, then I
Speaker 2: have to assume the worst. I have to Why else
Speaker 2: would you completely abandon all of your campaign promises? Why
Speaker 2: would you completely destroy your legacy? It's something major I
Speaker 2: don't know what it is, but I have to assume
Speaker 2: it's something very, very significant, And as far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 2: the same animosity that people are approaching Thomas Massey fucking idiots,
Speaker 2: I'm going to take that same tact with everybody within
Speaker 2: the Trump administration at present, because as far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 2: they are all co conspirators in this cover up, if
Speaker 2: not the operation itself. And I don't know how I
Speaker 2: come to any conclusion any other conclusion. I don't know
Speaker 2: how anybody comes to any other conclusion. It's so egregious
Speaker 2: and over the top. At this point, what are we
Speaker 2: to do. We have to assume that these people are
Speaker 2: involved at some level, and until we see people in
Speaker 2: handcuffs and orange jumpsuits being purp walked and prosecuted and
Speaker 2: jailed forever, I don't want to hear a fucking word
Speaker 2: from any of these people about anything else. That's all
Speaker 2: I care about. If I can't trust you on this,
Speaker 2: I can't trust you on anything, And I don't know
Speaker 2: why anybody would feel differently. This is the litmus test,
Speaker 2: this is the red line. If you can't deliver on this,
Speaker 2: we can't trust you ever again. That's very straightforward.
Speaker 16: We're of these goiam, GOI do you know what this is?
Speaker 2: I mean, I've heard the term, but what does it mean.
Speaker 2: It's a I think it means.
Speaker 16: Slaves, right, nation cattle nation cattle. Yeah, it's a racial
Speaker 16: slur to everybody that's not Jewish.
Speaker 2: This is in these files, like and she's saying everywhere.
Speaker 16: Not just her Epstein, Epstein, starting the former prime Minister
Speaker 16: of Israel, and.
Speaker 6: What is that?
Speaker 2: What's going on?
Speaker 16: And then we see all these these laws being passed
Speaker 16: here in the States for anti senitism.
Speaker 6: What about the rest of us? Why aren't we protecting
Speaker 6: the rest of us?
Speaker 2: So, as far as I'm concerned, until Trump actually rectifies
Speaker 2: this situation, which I don't expect him to, but until
Speaker 2: he actually fires these people and prosecutes or pushes for
Speaker 2: the prosecution of cash Hotel, I don't want to hear
Speaker 2: a fucking word about me standing by him or you know,
Speaker 2: carrying water for the GOP when it comes to the midterms,
Speaker 2: and honestly, if you're still watching political commentators that are
Speaker 2: telling you, like, get out the vote, we got to
Speaker 2: make sure that the GOP defeats these evil Democrats. It's
Speaker 2: like they're just not being honest with you. They're not
Speaker 2: being straight with you. They're not actually telling you the
Speaker 2: truth about the obvious depravity that exists within the GOP.
Speaker 2: They are access journalists. They are only interested in maintaining
Speaker 2: access with these high powered people because it benefits them,
Speaker 2: or at least they perceive benefit. Some of them are
Speaker 2: also being paid, and they're actually actively on the payroll,
Speaker 2: and they are actively you know, they're paid propagandas for
Speaker 2: the regime. But regardless, it's your prerogative. Okay, you get
Speaker 2: to decide who gets your attention. And if you're still
Speaker 2: giving I don't look, you don't even have to give
Speaker 2: it to me. If you find somebody else that you
Speaker 2: like better, more power to you. But you cannot continue
Speaker 2: to give it to people that you know are actively
Speaker 2: lying to you. Please stop, I'm begging you, and I'll
Speaker 2: end with this. There's one other guy who may not
Speaker 2: be actively lying to you, but I want you to
Speaker 2: really pay attention to his behavior right now or lack
Speaker 2: of action right now, because that guy is Jade Vance.
Speaker 2: Jadie Vance, prior to becoming the Vice President of the
Speaker 2: United States, was talking about how this case was really
Speaker 2: deeply concerning and that we needed justice. And he said,
Speaker 2: and I quote, remember when we learned that our wealthiest
Speaker 2: and most powerful people were connected to a guy who
Speaker 2: ran a literal child sex trafficking ring, and then that
Speaker 2: guy died mysteriously in a jail, and now we just
Speaker 2: don't talk about it. Yeah, I do remember that, JD.
Speaker 2: And I also remember when you said that. And I
Speaker 2: also am paying attention to the fact that you're not
Speaker 2: saying fucking anything like that right now. You're not saying
Speaker 2: anything about it, and you are doing the exact same
Speaker 2: thing that you condemned the Biden administration for doing. You
Speaker 2: are now actively covering up this obvious op. And if
Speaker 2: you think the people aren't noticing, you're wrong, We're noticing.
Speaker 2: You intend to be the next president of the United States.
Speaker 2: And if you don't differentiate yourself by calling this bullshit
Speaker 2: out right now, don't ever expect any of us to
Speaker 2: trust you. You're clearly part of the op itself. If
Speaker 2: you don't have the courage to stand up, especially with
Speaker 2: such an easy, obvious win like this, such an obvious
Speaker 2: great moral stance to take, and you're still too much
Speaker 2: of a bitch to take it, well, then You're not
Speaker 2: cut out to be the next president, and I don't
Speaker 2: think anybody should be supporting you if you don't have
Speaker 2: the fucking cohonas to say something right now. If you
Speaker 2: enjoy this episode, please do it The like button subscribe
Speaker 2: shared around. I'm pissed, all right, guys, leave you comment
Speaker 2: dumblow peace.
Speaker 6: The only thing Hillary Clinton has left to live for
Speaker 6: right now is destroying Donald Trump.
Speaker 12: Right, did you that? Woman?
Speaker 2: Last night?
Speaker 16: I was on my buddy Clint Russell's podcast at Liberty
Speaker 16: Locked Out.
Speaker 2: Clint Russell, by the way, criminally underrated. He's great, So
Speaker 2: it was meet him and Ian Carroll.
Speaker 16: Uh and we did yeah, yeah, Well it was a
Speaker 16: great show.