Speaker 1: The Rush Hour with James Golden entertaining and informative on
Speaker 1: the Red Apple Podcast Network.
Speaker 2: Look, the bottom line is, we're gonna win Michigan. Let
Speaker 2: me tell you why we're gonna win Michigan. First, l
Speaker 2: Saed has brought in new energy and new talent into
Speaker 2: the Democratic Party, but also in Michigan itself. But second, Michigan,
Speaker 2: Trump has so bungled the Michigan economy. You know, the
Speaker 2: numbers for Trump on how well he's doing and keeping
Speaker 2: costs down in the economy is in the low thirties
Speaker 2: in the country, it's in the high twenties in Michigan.
Speaker 2: Why he created a trade war with Canada. Anyone who's
Speaker 2: halfway decent as president knows that the Michigan economy and
Speaker 2: the Canadian economy are totally intertwined. And he's blown it.
Speaker 2: We're gonna win Michigan.
Speaker 3: I'd rather an economy that has one thousand millionaires in
Speaker 3: it than one billionaire, because that's what one billion is.
Speaker 1: It's a thousand million.
Speaker 3: And I think if we were willing to actually enforce
Speaker 3: the tox code right, you know, make the IRS hole again,
Speaker 3: unlike the cuts that Donald Trump just imposed upon it.
Speaker 3: And that we were able to get rid of those loopholes,
Speaker 3: we could have a much fairer tax system where we
Speaker 3: are making sure that people pay their fair share. I
Speaker 3: also think we got to start taxing wealth for people
Speaker 3: who have over one hundred million dollars. I mean, at
Speaker 3: that point, like, what even are you going to do
Speaker 3: with more money? And so you can start to pay
Speaker 3: back into the system that helped to make you all
Speaker 3: that money.
Speaker 1: Those are the Democrats, Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to that.
Speaker 1: I can't believe it's Friday again edition of Both Ermanies
Speaker 1: Rush Hour lsiad well, I'd rather have a thousand millionaires.
Speaker 1: And when being there, it's not up to you, pal.
Speaker 1: People make as much money as they can make. The
Speaker 1: communist mentality that runs through these people, well, it's time
Speaker 1: we tax wealth. You already have taxed the wealth as
Speaker 1: it's being created. You've taxed it and they've still made money. Well,
Speaker 1: and then we need to close the loopholes and make
Speaker 1: sure that people pay their fair shat. They're already paying
Speaker 1: most of the taxes in this country. Democrats run on
Speaker 1: class envy, class hatred. This is what they have. It's
Speaker 1: all about hatred with these people, it's racial hatred. It's
Speaker 1: somebody hates us, so we need to do something. It's
Speaker 1: you know, they hate my gender. They hate this, they
Speaker 1: hate that, they hate my race, they hate this. They
Speaker 1: hate the fact that I'm a woman. They hate this,
Speaker 1: they hate that, they hate the fact that that whip.
Speaker 1: Everything with these people is about hate. Either someone hates
Speaker 1: them or they hate someone else. They hate the wealthy,
Speaker 1: They hate people that have money. They hate people that work,
Speaker 1: they hate people that achieve, and they're gonna punish them
Speaker 1: so that everybody else like them. The haters can feel
Speaker 1: good about the punishment. And nowhere in their entire ideology
Speaker 1: is their common sense or is there a basis in fact?
Speaker 1: The basis of facts shows wealthy people the top one.
Speaker 1: Then you take it down to the top five percent
Speaker 1: pay the majority of taxes in this country. They always
Speaker 1: go on and on. Well, we need to invest in
Speaker 1: health We spend more money in health care than any
Speaker 1: other nation. What we get for it is another issue.
Speaker 1: I do agree that health care needs to be reformed.
Speaker 1: We need to put more money in education. We spend
Speaker 1: more money in education. What we get for it isn't
Speaker 1: our money's worth. We need to help the poor. We
Speaker 1: spend more money helping the poor, what we get from
Speaker 1: it isn't our money's worth. In fact, what we get
Speaker 1: for helping the poor is a bunch of illegal alien
Speaker 1: smugglers coming in here, defrauding the taxpayers and walking out
Speaker 1: with the money and taking it somewhere else. And then
Speaker 1: when you try to hold them to account, you get
Speaker 1: called racist for it. That's what the Democrat Party is.
Speaker 1: Nothing to do with common sense, nothing to do with
Speaker 1: being star watched for the American tax payer and making
Speaker 1: sure that the money is spent the way it is intended.
Speaker 1: It's all scamming based on emotionally driven hate campaigns. Anyway,
Speaker 1: excuse me that just I hadn't even intended on leading
Speaker 1: with that goodness, but when I hear it, it just
Speaker 1: sets me off. Today in the news, common sense prevails
Speaker 1: in Washington, DC. Common sense from the Supreme Court. Chief
Speaker 1: Justice John Roberts has allowed the White House to continue
Speaker 1: construction on President Donald Trump's four hundred million dollar ballroom
Speaker 1: project for now as the Supreme Court considers the Trump
Speaker 1: administration's emergency request to enter in the lawsuits over the projects. Guys,
Speaker 1: get the construction crews up and get them working, twenty
Speaker 1: four to seven. Get this done. The temporary order comes
Speaker 1: hours before lower court lower court rulings would have forced
Speaker 1: a halt to the above ground construction. Get it done.
Speaker 1: It will remain in place until the court issues a
Speaker 1: more durable decision, hopefully sometime two years from now, next year,
Speaker 1: two years, just give it some time. The order pauses
Speaker 1: the decision of a Washington d c. Liberal. They don't
Speaker 1: say that in the article liberal judge who found the
Speaker 1: work must stop because he didn't get congressional approval Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: which begs the question who runs the executive branch the Congress,
Speaker 1: the legislative branch or the executive branch. Here's what I mean.
Speaker 1: Let me explain this in a way that this should
Speaker 1: make sense to everybody. If Congress wants to do work
Speaker 1: on a building, Congress doesn't go to the president and
Speaker 1: say do you agree? Well, they have of their own
Speaker 1: discretionary funds that they can use in Congress uses this
Speaker 1: discretionary funds to do the work of Congress. They have
Speaker 1: discretionary funds set aside, and so they do work without
Speaker 1: going to They don't go to the Supreme Court, and
Speaker 1: they don't go to Congress the other branches of government.
Speaker 1: We have three equal branches of government, and say I
Speaker 1: need your permission to do the work that Congress wants
Speaker 1: to do. No, they do the work. The White House
Speaker 1: is an independent branch. It is an executive branch. The headquarters,
Speaker 1: if you will, of the executive branch is the White House,
Speaker 1: it's not Congress. So the president who's in charge of
Speaker 1: the executive brand said, you know what, we need to
Speaker 1: upgrade the building facilities here. We need to put some
Speaker 1: military stuff in it. We need to beef up the
Speaker 1: military security at this White House. And remember this is
Speaker 1: a president who has had more assassination attempts than any
Speaker 1: other president in American history. And given where we are,
Speaker 1: we're dealing with Iran and everything else. Yeah, we need
Speaker 1: to beef things up here. And by the way, we
Speaker 1: need a ballroom to host events at the White House,
Speaker 1: because when we do events, we have to do them
Speaker 1: on the outside lawn with tents, which is not as
Speaker 1: secure as being in a building. This has been an
Speaker 1: issue for a long time at the White House. Or
Speaker 1: we have to hold the events outside of the White
Speaker 1: House somewhere, like, for instance, the National Press Club event
Speaker 1: that could have been held in a White House ballroom,
Speaker 1: but instead was held at the Hilton Hotel and we
Speaker 1: saw another assassination attempt there. So now you get this group,
Speaker 1: the preservation, the National Trust for Historic Preservation in the
Speaker 1: United States, filing a lawsuit. Now, who the hell are
Speaker 1: these people. I don't remember reading anywhere the powers granted
Speaker 1: to the National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United
Speaker 1: States and our Constitution. They're not there. They weren't even around.
Speaker 1: They have no power to weigh in over the executive
Speaker 1: branch about what is being done. And I am so
Speaker 1: happy that right now this case is at least going
Speaker 1: to be decided by the Supreme Court, and in the
Speaker 1: meantime it's a clear butt out to all these butt
Speaker 1: in skis like the National Trust for Historic Preservation, it's
Speaker 1: something you can preserve in some where, you can preserve it.
Speaker 1: But I don't want to do that because it sounds
Speaker 1: rather lude. So anyway, the ballroom building goes on, Please
Speaker 1: get it done. I beg you get it done.