Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 1: As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the twenty fourth
Speaker 1: of December. Here of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well,
Speaker 1: today we're going to be in with some Christmas stories,
Speaker 1: and of course we'll take a look at festiv Us
Speaker 1: and the waste that is being talked about. It's not
Speaker 1: really about the money. There's some really evil stuff there,
Speaker 1: but of course government is the Christmas grift that keeps
Speaker 1: on taking and taking, and we're going to take a
Speaker 1: look at what Trump would like for Christmas. He's got
Speaker 1: a list Panama, Greenland, that nothing big. You know. Musk,
Speaker 1: by the way, is the one who is getting all
Speaker 1: the packages delivered to him and will take a look
Speaker 1: at what is in it for him and for his brother.
Speaker 1: In terms of these drones, some'm interesting developments there, but
Speaker 1: it really is about the great taking, and we're going
Speaker 1: to focus on that as we look at the end
Speaker 1: of the year and where we're going to be headed
Speaker 1: with this kind of retail CBDC. Even the Bank of
Speaker 1: International Settlement is now pushing that and that's exactly what
Speaker 1: Trump two point zero is all about. We'll be right back. Well,
Speaker 1: I just want to say thank you to everyone. The
Speaker 1: generosity yesterday was overwhelming and we are now over seven eighths,
Speaker 1: which is amazing. It was the fundraiser yesterday, plus we
Speaker 1: went through and we got the third week of December
Speaker 1: and checks that people had sent and so I'm going
Speaker 1: to read those names later in the program. But we
Speaker 1: are so grateful to all of you because we were
Speaker 1: concerned about this. We were down so low and we
Speaker 1: only had a few more days of broadcast left. Today
Speaker 1: we're broadcasting Tomorrow be a repeat, and then on Thursday
Speaker 1: will be a repeat, So Christmas Day will be a repeat,
Speaker 1: and the day after we'll have best of interviews. On Friday,
Speaker 1: we got Gardens Schoolsmith is going to be here live
Speaker 1: from Snowy, New Hampshire, and it'll be interesting, always interesting
Speaker 1: when guard is here. Next week we will have the
Speaker 1: regular schedule, except we'll be off on New Year's Day,
Speaker 1: but we'll be back on Thursday, the second. Tony will
Speaker 1: be with us on that day, so we're looking forward
Speaker 1: to that. But a lot of people are looking forward
Speaker 1: to tonight and we've got a lot of kids who
Speaker 1: are looking for Santa to come and Nord has been
Speaker 1: feeding this thing for quite some time. They actually put
Speaker 1: together some little videos and of course it was a
Speaker 1: colonel who somehow got a call by accident or something
Speaker 1: from a child. Really in nineteen fifty five, Where do
Speaker 1: you find nor AD's number in nineteen fifty five? Was
Speaker 1: it in the phone book? Do you remember phone books?
Speaker 1: They didn't have phone books there. You couldn't look up
Speaker 1: Norrad there, and probably a long distance number to remember
Speaker 1: how expensive long distance calls were. They were very expensive.
Speaker 1: But somehow a kid we're supposed to believe, called a
Speaker 1: colonel who just happened to be in public relations for Norad,
Speaker 1: just happened to be and you know, he explained to him,
Speaker 1: you know, we're tracking Santa Claus. You know again, why
Speaker 1: would a child know about Noorad and ask them about
Speaker 1: tracking Santa Claus. But they began this whole thing. Here
Speaker 1: is part of the myth, not just the Santa Claus myth,
Speaker 1: but the nora Ad myth.
Speaker 3: Colonel shouts. Intrepid public relations officer hurried to share the
Speaker 3: story with the world, making the colonel very well loved
Speaker 3: and regarded for the updates he was willing to provide
Speaker 3: on Santa's magical journey. In the years to come, Norarad
Speaker 3: would continue to update the world on Santa's flight every
Speaker 3: twenty fourth of December by using the same to wolves
Speaker 3: and equipment they use twenty four to seven, three hundred
Speaker 3: and sixty.
Speaker 1: Five days a year.
Speaker 3: Safe travels Santa fly comfortably knowing that we have the watch.
Speaker 3: That's right, they're watching you, dear viewers. Thank you for
Speaker 3: tuning in and spending some time with us. Be sure
Speaker 3: to follow along as Santa makes his way to your
Speaker 3: home by visiting www. Noor at Santa dot org or
Speaker 3: by calling eight seven seven number.
Speaker 1: Now until next time, until next time. That's right, you know.
Speaker 1: And it's such a perfect fit, isn't it. You know,
Speaker 1: they know when you're sleeping, they know when you're awake,
Speaker 1: they know if you've been batter good. They're watching everything,
Speaker 1: your omniscient, omnipotent government right there, kind of like God, right,
Speaker 1: and you know that was they What else are they
Speaker 1: lying to us about? But of course if it's the
Speaker 1: government chips in on it, that's the final word. Right.
Speaker 1: And so just like around that time you had miracle
Speaker 1: on thirty four Street, How did they know that this departments,
Speaker 1: or Santa Claus is a real Santa Claus. Remember in
Speaker 1: the trial, US Postal Service brings in all the letters
Speaker 1: and delivers them to him, and that proved it. If
Speaker 1: the government recognizes that this person is Santa Claus, or
Speaker 1: if Norad tells you that he's flying around and they
Speaker 1: got him on their radar. They don't know what the
Speaker 1: drones are, but they do know Santa Claus and they
Speaker 1: can track him everywhere. Well, they know what the drones
Speaker 1: are as well. But when the government says it, it's true.
Speaker 1: No matter how absurd you know, don't believe you're lying eyes,
Speaker 1: don't believe your critical thoughts. If the government tells you,
Speaker 1: just believe that's it. The big believe believe in what
Speaker 1: the government says. This is what they're doing right now
Speaker 1: with their Santa Tracker. You can go online and this
Speaker 1: is They've got it live on their website. You can
Speaker 1: see it live on Google. Google's got its own as well.
Speaker 1: The cherished tradition dates back to nineteen fifty five, when
Speaker 1: a misprint in a department store advertisement led a young
Speaker 1: child to call a Colorado military command center and asked
Speaker 1: to speak to Santa Claus and again, who are we
Speaker 1: to question government? Who are you to question the fact
Speaker 1: that this kid is is calling it's a misprint in
Speaker 1: the ad. He didn't dial a wrong number, but he
Speaker 1: gets a long distance call to this nor Ad Colonel
Speaker 1: Air Force Colonel Harry Shoop, who picked up the call
Speaker 1: that night, played along and assured the child that he
Speaker 1: was Santa, so he wasn't tracking center, he was actually Santa.
Speaker 1: Each year, at least one hundred thousand kids call into
Speaker 1: Norrad to inquire about Santa's location. Millions more follow online
Speaker 1: and nine languages. So you might also while you got
Speaker 1: them on the line, ask them to give you the
Speaker 1: straight shots on the new Jersey drones. Okay, it's crazy.
Speaker 1: How about this Ran Paul for your Festivus report. You
Speaker 1: want to do something about Norad and the money that
Speaker 1: they spent on this. So they got a large division
Speaker 1: there that is websites and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 1: You know, you could put this under there's a section
Speaker 1: in his Festivus report. We'll get to that in a minute.
Speaker 1: I think it was like ten million dollars or something
Speaker 1: that was just stuff on magic, you know, and I
Speaker 1: imagine this would be there, right, This could be in
Speaker 1: the magic section of Festivus. Norad just had the online
Speaker 1: track of children to watch Santa travel across the world
Speaker 1: in real times. I just showed you there. They can
Speaker 1: also download the Santa Tracker app. You're paying for this,
Speaker 1: by the way, your tax dollars on both the Apple
Speaker 1: App Store a Google Play Store. You got the toll
Speaker 1: free number. It's eight seven seven high Norrad. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: don't know what the number was back in nineteen fifty five.
Speaker 1: Of course Google is getting in on the scam as well.
Speaker 1: So again it's I don't even believe the weather app anymore,
Speaker 1: let alone the Santa app. And here's the question. This
Speaker 1: is an excellent essay from Daily Skeptic from doctor David Bell.
Speaker 1: He said, how can can science tell us the meaning
Speaker 1: of life? That's a really important question because we looked
Speaker 1: to science for answers for everything, don't we. We're talking
Speaker 1: about Norad. My son Whistler is doing the show this morning.
Speaker 1: He said, the heroic propagandist a kwd's like state nor
Speaker 1: Ad can track hypersonic Santa. That's right, he'd have to be.
Speaker 1: He'd have to be traveling hypersonics. Eat they get all
Speaker 1: these different places I have instantaneous I don't know. He's omnipresent,
Speaker 1: He's everywhere. He's like God, he knows everything. He's all powerful.
Speaker 1: Let's see, you're in Dallas, says do you have a
Speaker 1: cash app? Sir, Yes, we do, and it is Can
Speaker 1: you look it up on the website. We'll meet. But
Speaker 1: it is on the website d David knightshow dot com.
Speaker 1: You have to scroll down to the bottom to see
Speaker 1: where you can support the show. But it's there, And
Speaker 1: I forget what it is called. Maybe whist He can
Speaker 1: get that up for us, and I'll tell you in
Speaker 1: just a second Tree Free fifty six. But he travels
Speaker 1: on a drone or a balloon. We would have never
Speaker 1: discovered Santa if he did. That's right, Harpsy better watch
Speaker 1: out for all the drones and the orbs flying around.
Speaker 1: That's what they's got some competition up there this year.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Somebody in I forget where it was, saw the picture.
Speaker 1: They had an awl fly down the chimney. It must
Speaker 1: have thought it was Santa Claus right and perch on
Speaker 1: the tree. In Australia had a woman walk in to
Speaker 1: take a picture of it. Had found a kuala up
Speaker 1: in their Christmas Tree is saying there, So that's one
Speaker 1: up on Christmas Vacation where they just had the live
Speaker 1: squirrel and do you have can you just give me
Speaker 1: the number on it? There? We are right there. Cash
Speaker 1: app good and it's dollar David Knight Show, Dollar David
Speaker 1: Knight Show. Thank you for asking. I appreciate that. But
Speaker 1: let's talk about the meaning of life and if science
Speaker 1: can tell us what the meaning of life is. This
Speaker 1: is doctor David Belly. So imagine for a moment that
Speaker 1: there's nothing of worth in this world, as worth has
Speaker 1: no intrinsic meaning. You're going to take the evolutionary viewpoint.
Speaker 1: Each human, like each worm or bacterium, there's simply a
Speaker 1: product of chemical reactions occurring over millennia. Biological mass is all.
Speaker 1: We are a bunch of random chemicals. It somehow assembled. Eventually, Inevitably,
Speaker 1: they end up replicating certain patterns, as almost any alternate
Speaker 1: configuration decays its structure, returning to chemical soup. Movement of
Speaker 1: charged particles between some cells results in contraction of others
Speaker 1: or avoidance of nearby objects. Once in motion or a
Speaker 1: state within our neurons, it increases potential to preserve the
Speaker 1: pattern and to replicate it at its complex level. In humans,
Speaker 1: we term this a thought. Well, all I can say
Speaker 1: is I just don't have enough faith to believe in evolution.
Speaker 1: This is so disconnected from reality and even from science,
Speaker 1: because science presumes that there is something that can be determined.
Speaker 1: If it's all chance, random processes, we don't know anything.
Speaker 1: A state that enhances preservation and replication, we call that
Speaker 1: self gratification. We can also call it greed, a drive
Speaker 1: to enhance one's self through the use of other objects.
Speaker 1: So if we're simply chemical constructs, then this is the
Speaker 1: only thing that matters. These objects can be anything. They
Speaker 1: can be rocks, plants, other humans. The object doesn't matter
Speaker 1: in and of itself. Other humans become meaningless chemical constructs
Speaker 1: unless closely sharing the same genetic code. You want to
Speaker 1: know how the elitists can justify what they want to
Speaker 1: do to the rest of us, How they can justify
Speaker 1: putting out a depopulation by a weapon shot, How they
Speaker 1: can justify lying to us about everything, Because all that
Speaker 1: matters is that they climb to the top of the
Speaker 1: evolutionary heap, that you're nothing special, that there's no creator,
Speaker 1: that they will answer to codes that express greed more
Speaker 1: effectively may replicate more effectively. This means accumulating wealth and
Speaker 1: power and safeguarding descendants. In this view, our relationship with
Speaker 1: all other matter only has meaning through its enhancement of ourselves,
Speaker 1: and we are programmed for short term gratification lovers of self.
Speaker 1: That's it. That's how God describes this. The other consequence
Speaker 1: of viewing humans only as biological mass is that when
Speaker 1: a body's internal environment deteriorates to an extent that it
Speaker 1: can no longer maintain itself, it ends as a specific entity.
Speaker 1: That's not death because life never really existed. A highly
Speaker 1: complex set of chemical reactions ceased to be self sustaining,
Speaker 1: and another cascade took over, breaking down the physical structures
Speaker 1: that the former had produced. The neuronal circuitry that we
Speaker 1: call the mind disintegrates, and what we call thoughts stop.
Speaker 1: The horror or fear that this may induce is not
Speaker 1: meaningful in any way, just a product of more chemistry
Speaker 1: turned toward persistence for self replication. However, it is horror
Speaker 1: and fear to the extent that a body perceives it
Speaker 1: or feels it, and many people do every day. We
Speaker 1: feel a horror when staring into the void, and that
Speaker 1: has made humans wonder for millennia whether there is more
Speaker 1: than emptiness and self gratification. Such thoughts can be put
Speaker 1: aside by doing things that distract us. We can numb
Speaker 1: our brains with drugs. We can concentrate on the pursuit
Speaker 1: of money, or using and disposing of any other object
Speaker 1: to satisfy our drives. This might include other humans on
Speaker 1: Epstein Island, for example, or families in the way of
Speaker 1: a pipeline, or children in a mind digging rare earth materials.
Speaker 1: Or it could be them just seeing us as a
Speaker 1: receptacle for pharmaceuticals in order for the greedy businessmen and
Speaker 1: politicians to line their pockets with meaningless dollars. This is
Speaker 1: what it all leads to, folks that kind of mindset.
Speaker 1: The only viable alternative to steering into the void is
Speaker 1: the opposite. Total unmeasurable meaning meaning implies infinite omniscient presence
Speaker 1: and an absolute absence of irrelevance. If we have glimpsed
Speaker 1: both avoid and the infinite and infinite, we see that
Speaker 1: they cannot be reconciled, meaning that beyond ourselves makes possible
Speaker 1: all that we cannot understand directly demons, angels, evil, unrelenting love.
Speaker 1: Reality is no longer bound by deterministic processes. In this view,
Speaker 1: reality implies reality is beyond physics and time. The impossibility
Speaker 1: of reconciling these two world views is the only way
Speaker 1: to make sense of an omniscient presence appearing as a
Speaker 1: baby to socially non conforming parents and a subjugated population,
Speaker 1: then being killed off early with no legacy beyond local
Speaker 1: memories of what he had said and done. An infinite
Speaker 1: presence living and dying in relative obscurity in the Middle
Speaker 1: East means the power humans seek must be irrelevant compared
Speaker 1: to the value of life itself, the value of simply
Speaker 1: being a human, the value of any person must be
Speaker 1: immeasurably greater and have immeasurably more meaning. That's right, You know,
Speaker 1: when you think about this and you think about Christmas,
Speaker 1: the words of an Oh, holy Knight, till he appeared
Speaker 1: in the soul felt his worth a thrill of hope.
Speaker 1: The weary world rejoices. That's what that's really about. The
Speaker 1: power and the wealth of a corporation, a country, or
Speaker 1: a cause is not that important. A being who must
Speaker 1: rationally have understanding infinitely greater than ours, has demonstrated entirely
Speaker 1: different values and in contra contradiction to Darwin and the Huxleys.
Speaker 1: By the way, you know Musk, When you look at Musk,
Speaker 1: I always have wondered if his fascination with X goes
Speaker 1: back to the X Club. The X Club in the
Speaker 1: late eighteen hundreds, you had people the forerunner of the
Speaker 1: Huxley is a grandfather of Aldus Huxley and Julian Huxley.
Speaker 1: Of course Aldous Huxley who wrote Brave New World, Julian Huxley,
Speaker 1: who coined the term transhumanism. Their grandfather was a founder
Speaker 1: of a club they called it the X Club, and
Speaker 1: it had the nine I guess, most elitist of the
Speaker 1: quote unquote scientists of the day. They were very focused
Speaker 1: on pushing Darwinian evolution and they were the elite intelligencia
Speaker 1: of the day. And of course his father, you know,
Speaker 1: Holdest Huxley's grandfather, Todd H. G. Wells as well. This
Speaker 1: is really where this transhumanism and this technocracy really spawns from,
Speaker 1: spawns from an elitist evolutionary mindset, and that's really what
Speaker 1: the X Club was about. And of course, Elon Musk
Speaker 1: himself comes from people who bought into that completely. His
Speaker 1: grandfather was Joshua Haldane, was a chiropractor I think in Canada,
Speaker 1: but he became fascinated with the technocracy and actually tried
Speaker 1: to replace the government in can They brought charges against him.
Speaker 1: He escaped the prosecution and then escaped to South Africa.
Speaker 1: But that's been ingrained in Elon Musk, this whole technocracy stuff.
Speaker 1: But you know, when we look at this, the contradiction
Speaker 1: that we see in the in the incarnation in the
Speaker 1: beginning was the word and of course that implies intelligence,
Speaker 1: does it doesn't it? Right? I mean, the simple thing is,
Speaker 1: we don't believe that a building came about by a
Speaker 1: tornado and a junkyard. When we look at a car,
Speaker 1: we know that it has a maker. So that's one
Speaker 1: of the first things we look, well, who made that car,
Speaker 1: what company made that car? And of course when we
Speaker 1: look at everything around us in the world, right, and
Speaker 1: the beginning was a logos. Logos is more than just
Speaker 1: a word. Logos in the word sense. It's more like
Speaker 1: when you look at a computer and you've got eight bits,
Speaker 1: you say, well, it's an eight bit word, or you
Speaker 1: got sixteen bits, that's a sixteen bit word or whatever.
Speaker 1: But you know, just one bit pulled together into a
Speaker 1: collection starts to give it meaning. Just like if you
Speaker 1: pull a bunch of genes together and a string, you
Speaker 1: wind up with DNA that give shape and form and
Speaker 1: everything to all living things, plants and animals as well
Speaker 1: as humans. And so when we look at all of this,
Speaker 1: and as he winds up, doctor David Bell s, it's
Speaker 1: a Christmas story beyond the current themes of presence and
Speaker 1: food and self gratification, provides a window on how distant
Speaker 1: the world's dominant value system is from that which a
Speaker 1: recognition of the meaning of life represents, and why these
Speaker 1: two value systems or understandings of reality cannot be reconciled.
Speaker 1: An image of a baby lying in a borrowed hey
Speaker 1: box is so far removed from the world's view of success,
Speaker 1: isn't it that it can only come from another place?
Speaker 1: It means something completely different. We'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the Day Night Show.
Speaker 1: Welcome back. Jason Barker says, Henna spends more time in
Speaker 1: Ukraine and Israel than any of that nation. Got lots
Speaker 1: of gifts and grifts to deliver them, doesn't he don't
Speaker 1: frag me, bro, Thank you very much for the tip.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that. May the God of Christ bless you
Speaker 1: and your family and us all here, so it's all
Speaker 1: having another great year. In twenty twenty five, we walk
Speaker 1: through the Valley of Shadow, fear, no evil, Jesus Christ,
Speaker 1: our Lord is with us. Absolutely Octosepoot says, can you
Speaker 1: scroll that up a little bit? The probability for life
Speaker 1: to have come from mud puddles makes winning the lotto
Speaker 1: multiple times per day look like childs White. You have
Speaker 1: this whole thing about if we had an infinite amount
Speaker 1: of time, and of course we do in their imaginations
Speaker 1: have an infinite amount of time. The chimpanzee could set
Speaker 1: down at a timeewriter and over a period of time
Speaker 1: create Shakespeare just by random key punches. It's like, absolutely
Speaker 1: not you say that you don't understand anything about probabilities.
Speaker 1: I mean they just multiply out. Talk about all those
Speaker 1: individual characters. It's insane. KWD sixty eight. American Airlines had
Speaker 1: a stoppage today. I bet that was a pleasant scene. Yeah,
Speaker 1: really wow. KWD sixty eight answers in Genesis, Kenham does
Speaker 1: a great job in renouncing the Big Bang evolution science
Speaker 1: faults it. Yes he does, and I would highly recommend
Speaker 1: that to you. I like what they do with their
Speaker 1: Creation Museum, what they do when you go there. They
Speaker 1: have they say, here's the facts, here's what we can observe,
Speaker 1: here's the way the evolutionists interpret this, and here's the
Speaker 1: way the people who believe the Bible would interpret this
Speaker 1: from two different starting points. And that's a very fair
Speaker 1: and rational way to view this. And it's really done
Speaker 1: excellent quality. We were involved with helping them in the
Speaker 1: early stages of the Creation Museum, and you actually find
Speaker 1: find our family's name on a plaque there. But yeah,
Speaker 1: it's a great place to visit. I like the arc
Speaker 1: experience even better. The second thing that they did up there,
Speaker 1: guard Goldsmith. The very fact that people look for meaning
Speaker 1: ought to give them a hint that their existence is
Speaker 1: more than material. That's right, that's right. You know, when
Speaker 1: we look at Christmas carols and we look at some
Speaker 1: of the meaning in it. One of the reasons that
Speaker 1: I decided in our family that we'd celebrated in spite
Speaker 1: of the fact that you know, there's a lot of
Speaker 1: false stuff that is interwoven with it. Always will be,
Speaker 1: you know, there's always going to be tears sewn in
Speaker 1: among the wheat, amongst the wheat. But you just navigate
Speaker 1: your way through it, and you point out that this
Speaker 1: is true, that's not true, this is true, that's not true.
Speaker 1: But there's a lot of things that I thought were
Speaker 1: very worthwhile for us to focus on as a family,
Speaker 1: the incarnation, the fulfillment of prophecy. But you know also
Speaker 1: the fact that the Christmas story and the incarnation of
Speaker 1: Christ really honors life. It honors children, it honors motherhood.
Speaker 1: These are things that are dishonored in our society. Life, children, motherhood,
Speaker 1: these are things that are despised in American ass no
Speaker 1: longer you know mom and apple pie. No, I don't
Speaker 1: know about apple pie, but they don't like motherhood. Right,
Speaker 1: So that's I think one of the most important things
Speaker 1: of Christmas time, that message to remind us about that.
Speaker 1: And you know, there's a great carol. I love the
Speaker 1: work of John Rutter. He's still alive and he is
Speaker 1: not that much different in age from me, I don't think.
Speaker 1: In the nineteen eighties and then I he did a
Speaker 1: lot of very nice Christmas carols that I would highly
Speaker 1: recommend to you. They're British and he's got his own
Speaker 1: orchestra as well as choral singers. But I don't want
Speaker 1: to read you just the beginning of the lyrics of
Speaker 1: the Candlelight Carol by John Ritter. He says, how do
Speaker 1: you capture the wind on the water? How do you
Speaker 1: count all the stars in the sky? How do you
Speaker 1: measure the love of a mother? How can you write
Speaker 1: down a baby's first cry? That is the thing that
Speaker 1: is missing in our society, the valuing of life of
Speaker 1: a family, of motherhood. He concludes the song with Godhead
Speaker 1: Incarnate and hope of salvation, a child with his mother
Speaker 1: that first Christmas Day, and so that is something that
Speaker 1: our culture has lost. And that's another aspect of the
Speaker 1: Christmas story that is wonderful and we've really been blessed
Speaker 1: in our family this last year. Somebody yesterday asked if
Speaker 1: Travis's baby had been born yet, I thought, yeah, I should.
Speaker 1: I never showed people the pictures of it. I did
Speaker 1: mention the baby had been born. Here's a picture that
Speaker 1: was taken as they were taking him out of the hospital.
Speaker 1: It's about the first week of November. So I guess
Speaker 1: he's what about seven weeks old now? Maybe? Oh no,
Speaker 1: not about five weeks old. I guess right. And there
Speaker 1: is coming out and then here's Travis with him, and
Speaker 1: the two of them asleep. And of course it's last year,
Speaker 1: and we talked much about what's going on with our family.
Speaker 1: But my daughter had a child earlier this year. And
Speaker 1: here is a picture of him. He looks very grown up.
Speaker 1: He's not that old. He was just here Thanksgiving. He
Speaker 1: looks a lot older here. I was surprised that. But
Speaker 1: he is being held up on that rocking horse there.
Speaker 1: We had a rocking horse like that. We gave that
Speaker 1: to him when they came here for for Thanksgiving. But
Speaker 1: he had a rocking horse like that for my sons,
Speaker 1: Travis and Whistler, and I taught them how to sing
Speaker 1: back in the saddle again. I both knew to back
Speaker 1: on the saddle again. Here's a more typical picture of
Speaker 1: him asleep in the car chair. You get a better
Speaker 1: idea of his age. He looks a lot older in
Speaker 1: that other one. But we've been really blessed. I guess
Speaker 1: he's maybe about seven months. Everything is flying by, so fast.
Speaker 1: I don't know where we are really, But the Church
Speaker 1: of England bishops are claiming that Christmas carols that say
Speaker 1: that Jesus is the true Messiah are problematic. This is
Speaker 1: kind of funny because people know why the Church of
Speaker 1: England is at this point in time. It's even in
Speaker 1: the name right. It's a political institution. It has nothing
Speaker 1: to do with Christ. It's all about England. It's the
Speaker 1: Church of England. It's not the Church of Christ. It's not.
Speaker 1: And for the first time in nine hundred years, they
Speaker 1: have now have girls joining the choir because you always had.
Speaker 1: One of the things that was very distinctive about English music,
Speaker 1: especially Christmas music, was the boys choir. I have a
Speaker 1: very distinctive sound. And so now in the name of diversity,
Speaker 1: we're going to get rid of that diversity. We're going
Speaker 1: to homogenize everything. But bishops within the Church of England
Speaker 1: have raised concern that certain Christmas carols might be problematic,
Speaker 1: that's their term, because of their explicit references to Jesus
Speaker 1: as the quote true Messiah. They said the need to
Speaker 1: reassess the language used in hymns to create an inclusive environment.
Speaker 1: Oh so inclusive, except that they're going to exclude Christ.
Speaker 1: These people who talk about inclusivity and diversity, nothing at
Speaker 1: all like that. They want to homogenize everything. I mean,
Speaker 1: we look at oh yeah, we got a We look
Speaker 1: at what they're doing with Europe again. In just my
Speaker 1: short lifetime, I've seen Europe go from this highly diversified place.
Speaker 1: Different culture, different clothing, you know, different you know, the food,
Speaker 1: the music, the architecture, everything was different, the money, you know.
Speaker 1: And you just travel a short little distance for US
Speaker 1: Americans and you're in a completely different environment. And now
Speaker 1: they're just homogenizing everything, dumbing it down into this gray gook.
Speaker 1: You know. The Birmingham Diocese instructed clergy to quote use
Speaker 1: language that won't add further confusion or tension or take
Speaker 1: away anything from the good news of the Nativity. Well,
Speaker 1: that is the good news, the fact that Jesus is
Speaker 1: the true Messiah. You take that away, you've taken away everything.
Speaker 1: The hymn's under scrutiny include lo he comes with clouds descending,
Speaker 1: and that is not l ow. I would always, I
Speaker 1: guess if I was singing that, I would always be
Speaker 1: thinking low he's coming, and he's coming down low, He's
Speaker 1: descending right there. But it's kind of like the kid
Speaker 1: who are gladly the cross eyed bear. He said, I'd
Speaker 1: like to have that bear, you know, the which one
Speaker 1: gladly who's cross eyed, you know, but low he comes
Speaker 1: with clouds descending. Was a favorite of Queen Victoria, and
Speaker 1: it's been criticized by these people for declaring that Jesus
Speaker 1: is the true Messiah. I wonder if they will go
Speaker 1: back and rename him's messiah. You know, we should handles blank,
Speaker 1: just redact it. Church of England again, just politicized entity,
Speaker 1: these elite frauds, not of Christ, just scammers, that says
Speaker 1: Whistler says, don't let anything stand in the way in Nativity,
Speaker 1: including the Nativity itself. That's right. So another one ocam
Speaker 1: Okami manual has been singled out for its phrase captive
Speaker 1: Israel in the first verse, I said, this could be
Speaker 1: confused with what is going on with Israel and Hamas
Speaker 1: right now. We have a lot of people who confuse
Speaker 1: Israel believers of all nations, who are true believers of
Speaker 1: all nations, who were held captive to the power and
Speaker 1: the penalty of sin until Christ removes that. That's the meaning,
Speaker 1: right there the true believers of all nations held captive
Speaker 1: to the power and the penalty of sin until Christ
Speaker 1: removed it. That is the gospel. And they say, well,
Speaker 1: we gotta we got to change these hymns because people
Speaker 1: are confused members of our team working closely with diverse communities. No,
Speaker 1: they're not. They don't want diversity at all. Birmingham invited
Speaker 1: churches to think about providing some context for people new
Speaker 1: to the church who might be unsure why Israel is
Speaker 1: being discussed. See, here's another reason I think to celebrate Christmas.
Speaker 1: It's an opportunity for us to speak into the culture.
Speaker 1: There's an opportunity for us to explain that. You know,
Speaker 1: captive is or what's that about? You know, here's your
Speaker 1: opportunity to explain it. And these people don't want to
Speaker 1: explain it. They want to run from it. Look, the
Speaker 1: good News is not an argument, it's not a debate.
Speaker 1: It's just a proclamation. And captive Israel will understand it
Speaker 1: when they hear it. That's the way it works. They'll
Speaker 1: hear it, they will understand. Others will not. This Christmas,
Speaker 1: maybe Jesus becomes the tool of Islamist propaganda. This is
Speaker 1: from Christian posts. They said, in any normal year, Bethlehem
Speaker 1: would be filled with tourists celebrating the birth of Jesus.
Speaker 1: But for the second year in a row, Christian leaders
Speaker 1: of Gaza decided to cancel Christmas, claiming allyship with the
Speaker 1: Palestinians and Gaza. And if that wasn't enough, some of
Speaker 1: the Christian leaders chose to reenact the story very differently.
Speaker 1: And of course you have people are constantly reinventing the message,
Speaker 1: changing what everything is about. I mean, just take a
Speaker 1: look at all these LGBT churches that worship LGBT, or
Speaker 1: you got churches that worship Israel and Gaza. You got
Speaker 1: churches that worship Gaza. Right, the Palestinians, they can always
Speaker 1: find something other than Jesus worship, can't They could be Palestinians,
Speaker 1: it could be Israel, it could be LGBT anything. In
Speaker 1: the new version, Baby Jesus is no longer Jewish but Palestinian,
Speaker 1: and he's no longer lying in a manger, but in
Speaker 1: the rubble of a building in Gaza, wrapped in a cafia.
Speaker 1: I think it's the way you pronounce that thing. I
Speaker 1: think that's the headdress that they have I'm not sure.
Speaker 1: Pope Francis inaugurated a Nativity scene in the Vatican that
Speaker 1: showed Jesus laying on a kafia, so that's a different thing. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure what that is. I guess I should
Speaker 1: have looked it up. Not really interested though. The scene
Speaker 1: was eventually removed after the Pope got a lot of backlash.
Speaker 1: I guess he replaced it with the pacamama amazon idol
Speaker 1: that he had. That also, somebody went in and picked
Speaker 1: that thing up and threw it into the river. Appropriating
Speaker 1: the story of Jesus's birth to fit modern social issues.
Speaker 1: This is a fairly common practice. In nineteen forty eight,
Speaker 1: Christians were eighty five percent of the population of Bethlehem.
Speaker 1: Today they're less than ten percent. They're more Christians and
Speaker 1: Saint Patrick's Cathedral on Christmas Eve than there are Christians
Speaker 1: left in Bethlehem. That's pretty amazing, because nobody goes to
Speaker 1: church anymore. Maybe they do on Christmas Eve. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Radical Islamisists held bent on destruction and religious persecution. The
Speaker 1: Islamis issues a variety of tactics to drive out Christians.
Speaker 1: Tactics range from general employment discrimination, all the way to
Speaker 1: targeted killings. And this is the way we see it
Speaker 1: happening everywhere, not just there, but in India with the
Speaker 1: Hindus and Nigeria other places. In twenty fourteen, a young
Speaker 1: woman from Bethlehem began speaking out about the suffering of
Speaker 1: Christians in Bethlehem. She came from a prominent family and
Speaker 1: was even featured in a major TV news series on
Speaker 1: the plight of Christians in Bethlehem. The more she spoke
Speaker 1: out about the plight of Christians in Bethlehem, the more
Speaker 1: she and her family were attacked and she eventually had
Speaker 1: to flee for her safety. In a report from the
Speaker 1: Jerusaleths Tout for Justice, they detailed her case. So we
Speaker 1: will will not get into the details of that, but
Speaker 1: I want to talk about where we live the commercial
Speaker 1: versus the spiritual. As I said before, Jesus saves, but
Speaker 1: Santa sells. That's why there is so much around focused
Speaker 1: around him. Each year, the National Retail Federation predicts the
Speaker 1: spending patterns of Americans during the holidays. As twenty twenty
Speaker 1: four winds down, Christmas expenditures are head of last year,
Speaker 1: with an anticipated total of nine hundred and eighty nine
Speaker 1: billion nationwide. I'm surprised. I mean, it's nearly a trillion dollars,
Speaker 1: but I'm surprised that it's that small, because it's really
Speaker 1: kind of the time that makes most of these retailers
Speaker 1: make it or break it. From Black Friday onto Christmas,
Speaker 1: the typical shopper will spend six hundred and forty one
Speaker 1: dollars on family or friends, and an additional two hundred
Speaker 1: and sixty one on seasonal items like wrapping paper decorations.
Speaker 1: Interestingly enough, fifty seven percent of consumers plan to buy
Speaker 1: something for themselves this Christmas because that's the one person
Speaker 1: who knows what you want. Many of us will not
Speaker 1: know exactly how much we spend on Christmas until that
Speaker 1: first credit card statement arrives in January. Through finance charges
Speaker 1: and late fees, the ghost of Christmas past often keeps
Speaker 1: our celebrations alive well past the new year. One in
Speaker 1: five Americans will live with the gooulish reminder of overindulge
Speaker 1: shopping and impulse purchases until Independence Day of next year.
Speaker 1: Of course, they'll take you long to get independent of
Speaker 1: the taxation, and work a lot longer than that to
Speaker 1: get rid of your taxes. These observations notwithstanding, I want
Speaker 1: to suggest, no matter how much our festive indulgences cost us,
Speaker 1: this is our Also from the Christian Post, the real
Speaker 1: price tag for Christmas is astronomically higher. No amount of
Speaker 1: spending can begin to compare with a great sacrifice the
Speaker 1: Lord Jesus made because of his first coming. From beginning
Speaker 1: to end, it was a gift of infinite value. As
Speaker 1: Isaiah fifty five says, let those about money come by
Speaker 1: and eat. Yeah, And so when you look at it
Speaker 1: in Bethlehem, you know the town that was known as
Speaker 1: house of Bread, and Jesus lying in a manger where
Speaker 1: the food goes for the animals. It's all about that.
Speaker 1: And it's not just once a year. You know, if
Speaker 1: you ate once a year, it wouldn't last too long. Right.
Speaker 1: You need the daily bread and not just material, but
Speaker 1: the daily spiritual feeding in order to stay alive spiritually.
Speaker 1: So what is the best gift that you could receive
Speaker 1: this Christmas? Well, God did just the opposite of bargain shopping.
Speaker 1: We look for the best product at lowest costs, but God,
Speaker 1: seeking to save the life the lost, was willing to
Speaker 1: pay the highest price. You know, we look at our
Speaker 1: culture when we think about how anti Christian it has become,
Speaker 1: how much censorship there is involved in it. It's interesting
Speaker 1: to go back and look at a Charlie Brown Christmas
Speaker 1: because even at that time, and we're talking fifty nine
Speaker 1: years ago, December nineteen sixty five, had studio executives and
Speaker 1: heads did not want to have it. They said it
Speaker 1: was to Christian and have lionus, you know, reading from
Speaker 1: the Book of Luke in it. He says, Charlie Brown
Speaker 1: is exasperating, says, isn't there anybody who knows what Christmas
Speaker 1: is all about? He turns, He's exasperated when he says it.
Speaker 1: And they were exasperated when they saw this in the
Speaker 1: script the people who were the producers, the network, the
Speaker 1: CBS executives, and all the rest of them. The citing
Speaker 1: of scripture didn't easily pass the cynicism and the cowardly
Speaker 1: cultural gatekeepers of American network TV even sixty years ago.
Speaker 1: But Charles Schultz, who wrote Peanuts, and his production team
Speaker 1: offered the first of what became many Peanuts specials to
Speaker 1: CBS executives in December of nineteen sixty five. In fact,
Speaker 1: even before the suits tried to remove mentioning Christ from
Speaker 1: the Christmas Show. Schultz's two partners in the venture, Lee
Speaker 1: Mendelssohn and Bill Melendez, both advised him to take the
Speaker 1: Gospel passage out of Lionus's mouth. One of those executives
Speaker 1: put it this way. He said, the Bible thing scares us.
Speaker 1: That's what he said, quote unquote. The Peanuts creator responded
Speaker 1: and spoke volumes. He said, well, if we don't do it,
Speaker 1: who will, you know. I think it's kind of interesting
Speaker 1: that the Rudolph Red Nose reindeer production, the ranking Bass thing,
Speaker 1: you know, with bur Lives and Yukon Cornelius, all that
Speaker 1: stuff that was done the year before, So that's sixty
Speaker 1: years old this year. That was done in December of
Speaker 1: nineteen sixty four. No problem with that, you know, just
Speaker 1: Santa Claus and Rudolph and Yukon Cornelius and all the
Speaker 1: rest of stuff all all made up. That's not a problem.
Speaker 1: But you can't have one of the cartoon characters reading
Speaker 1: from the Bible. The fact that any mention of Jesus
Speaker 1: over the public airwaves was controversial or ill advised in
Speaker 1: the nineteen sixties may come as a shock to us
Speaker 1: in the twenty twenties. Somehow I'd imagined in earlier America
Speaker 1: as being more tolerant and less paranoid of potential offense,
Speaker 1: or in a word, timid. But this is simply not
Speaker 1: the case and an interesting aside. Only a year later,
Speaker 1: Brian Wilson of the Beach Boys, when he penned the
Speaker 1: classic God Only Knows, was told that his song was
Speaker 1: too religious and too square. This is exactly what Lucy
Speaker 1: tells Charlie after he has the audacity to buy a
Speaker 1: wooden Christmas tree for their play. We all know, she
Speaker 1: says the psychologist of the group. We all know Christmas
Speaker 1: is a big commercial racket among the aluminum trees and
Speaker 1: the Christmas queens. As Lucy refers to herself, what room
Speaker 1: is there for the light of the world. Fortunately we
Speaker 1: have Lioness to put Charlie the whole gang in us right.
Speaker 1: Despite the skepticism of the cultural taste makers at CBS,
Speaker 1: A Charlie Brown Christmas was a giganticit On first broadcast
Speaker 1: December ninth, nineteen sixty five, one New York ad man said,
Speaker 1: all Heaven broke loose. They said, this is a special
Speaker 1: that really is special. It went on to win a
Speaker 1: Peabody Award and become a Christmas icon, because that is
Speaker 1: what Christmas is all about.
Speaker 5: Charlie Brown, I guess you are right, liness, I shouldn't
Speaker 5: have picked this little tree. Everything I do turns into
Speaker 5: a disaster. I guess I really don't know what Christmas
Speaker 5: is all about. Isn't there anyone who knows what Christmas.
Speaker 2: Is all about?
Speaker 6: Sure, Charlie Brown, I can tell you what Christmas is
Speaker 6: all about. Fights, please. And there were in the same
Speaker 6: country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their
Speaker 6: flock by night. And lo, the Angel of the Lord
Speaker 6: came upon them. The glory of the lords are wrong
Speaker 6: to balk them. And they were sore afraid. And the
Speaker 6: Angel said into them, if you're not for behold, I
Speaker 6: bring you tidings. A great joy which will be to
Speaker 6: all people for aunto you is born this day in
Speaker 6: the city of David. A savior is Christ the Lord.
Speaker 6: And this shall be a sign unto you. He shall
Speaker 6: find the Babe, wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in the manger.
Speaker 6: And suddenly there was with the Angel a multitude of
Speaker 6: the heavenly host, praising God and saying glory to God
Speaker 6: in the highest and on earth peace, good will toward men.
Speaker 6: That's what Christmas has thought about.
Speaker 7: Charlie Brown.
Speaker 2: Think you're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: All right, welcome back, and Jason Barker Nard should report
Speaker 1: this year that Santa was taken out by Putin with
Speaker 1: a supersonic missile and then they'll regain support for the war.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Jason. And by the way, merry Christmas to
Speaker 1: allow you and Jason, especially Jason and Angry Tiger Knights
Speaker 1: of the Storm and you find them on Twitter as
Speaker 1: well as on Rockfinn and the same with gart Liberty
Speaker 1: Conspiracy on Twitter and rock Fan and Garden is going
Speaker 1: to be here on Friday. During the show, he says
Speaker 1: the IDF has been destroying most Christian churches in Palestine
Speaker 1: and Gaza, and the IDF just removed a cross from
Speaker 1: gol On Heights. That's right. When you look at when
Speaker 1: you look at the news, those the Christian sites will
Speaker 1: completely discount what is happening to the people there. They're
Speaker 1: you know, and the Christians are being killed by both sides.
Speaker 1: I act by both sides. That's typical for what is happening.
Speaker 1: But yeah, it is. It is horrific what is happening there,
Speaker 1: the fact that it continues without stopping whatsoever. So Goy says,
Speaker 1: if everywhere is diverse, does diversity still exist? Well, you
Speaker 1: know that diversity doesn't mean what they say it means,
Speaker 1: just like vaccines don't mean what they say they mean anymore.
Speaker 1: They've changed the meaning of all of these words are
Speaker 1: all malleable. And that's why, you know, we we just
Speaker 1: we have to understand how they're using the language. They
Speaker 1: don't mean diversity at all. Atomic Dog says, Bible scares us, demons,
Speaker 1: all of them. That's why they recoil. And you see
Speaker 1: the CBS executives sixty years ago recoiling a vampire in
Speaker 1: a movie with a full out across KWE sixty eight
Speaker 1: TV programs. That's the correct word. Yeah, that's right. It
Speaker 1: does program people, doesn't it. That's why we call it
Speaker 1: the show we're trying to show people instead of programming
Speaker 1: people music eight eight amazing. What offends empty souls? That's true. Well,
Speaker 1: while we talk about that, let's talk about CNN. They're
Speaker 1: offended trying to shame fathers out of buying hunting rifles
Speaker 1: for their sons. This is AWR. Hawkins writing at Breitbart.
Speaker 1: He focuses on firearms and on Second Amendment issues. Less
Speaker 1: than a week after a fifteen year old girl shot
Speaker 1: and killed two in Madison, Wisconsin at a Christian school,
Speaker 1: CNN went all in too shame fathers out of buying
Speaker 1: hunting rifles for their sons. The alleged abundant life Christian
Speaker 1: school shooter used a handgun, said the Madison chief Police.
Speaker 1: But again they don't care. It's just any kind of firearm,
Speaker 1: and it's not the firearms. Just as we saw somebody
Speaker 1: in the Christmas market in Magdeburg. Look at how many
Speaker 1: people he killed. Two hundred people injured and forty of
Speaker 1: them critical, five dead already. But I don't know if
Speaker 1: that has gone up. Used the vehicle. We had a
Speaker 1: Christmas prey to attack a couple of years ago. Used
Speaker 1: the vehicle. The problem is the people guns were actually
Speaker 1: more prevalent, as even RFK Junior has said were prevalent
Speaker 1: when he was going up same age as me. We
Speaker 1: sued to see him all the time. We see people
Speaker 1: riding around with rifles and a rifle rack in their
Speaker 1: pickup truck. CNA n rolled out of piece targeting parents
Speaker 1: who buy their sons or daughters firearms in order to hunt.
Speaker 1: CNN began the article of the story of an Oregon dad,
Speaker 1: Paul Kemp, who bought a hunting rifle for his son Nathan,
Speaker 1: when he turned six ten years old. Nathan has been
Speaker 1: hunting with his dad since he was seven years old.
Speaker 1: Parents looking to purchase a firearm for their child and
Speaker 1: the holidays have to balance their hopes, says CNN, for
Speaker 1: the gift with a wrist that comes with such a purchase,
Speaker 1: such as an accidental shooting or suicide, or the gun
Speaker 1: being used in a crime, Well, the best way to
Speaker 1: make sure that doesn't happen is to educate your kids
Speaker 1: about how to properly use a gun. Yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, instead of just pulling back and saying something
Speaker 1: like you'll shoot your eye out.
Speaker 2: Oh there.
Speaker 1: It is the holy grail of Christmas gifts, the Red
Speaker 1: Rider two hundred shot range model air rifle.
Speaker 7: Wealthy, what would you like for Christmas?
Speaker 1: Horrified? I hurt myself, blurted out.
Speaker 6: I'm an official ridder.
Speaker 5: To come an action to it, joins, well, air, I
Speaker 5: no shoot your eyeout?
Speaker 8: Oh no, it was the classic mother BB gun block,
Speaker 8: you'll shoot your eye out.
Speaker 1: And we had a friend she leaned to the left,
Speaker 1: and she did not want her son to have a gun.
Speaker 1: She was horrified that our kids had all kinds of
Speaker 1: toy guns to play with. And then one day she
Speaker 1: said the care and she said, I just watched him
Speaker 1: out there playing in the yard. He doesn't have any guns,
Speaker 1: but he's picking up sticks and he's going pewp you peope.
Speaker 1: I just realized it was kind of ingrained as maybe
Speaker 1: the best thing that you can do is just kind
Speaker 1: of educate them about the importance of it and how
Speaker 1: to use it. But you know, you can have the
Speaker 1: dreaded mom answer, or you can have the dreaded CNN answer,
Speaker 1: because CNN is the nanny state incarnate, isn't it. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: it's not just the guns, but it's also the cars.
Speaker 1: British drivers are steering away from new cars and droves
Speaker 1: because they're not going to be driving them anywhere. They're
Speaker 1: going to be driving them anywhere. British car buyers are
Speaker 1: turning away from new vehicles, they said. The Telegraph in
Speaker 1: the UK says we're looking to a future with more
Speaker 1: and more people driving older and older cars, trusty motors
Speaker 1: from the two thousands, in the early twenty tens, they
Speaker 1: say in the UK, the Pujo one oh seven. I'd
Speaker 1: be surprised to see a Pujo as a trustee owned
Speaker 1: one once. Then they don't even sell them in the
Speaker 1: United States anymore. They're not trusty enough. The Ford Focus,
Speaker 1: the Honda Jazz, the Vauxhall Course Up, they're all still
Speaker 1: very common sight in the UK, with owners refusing to
Speaker 1: put them out to pasture. In fact, sixteen million of
Speaker 1: the thirty four million motors on Britain's roads are more
Speaker 1: than a decade old. Experts believe this will continue to
Speaker 1: increase in the years to come, thanks to Labour's unrelenting
Speaker 1: war on motorists. That's right, it is a war on motors.
Speaker 1: So we talk about car bans, we should talk about
Speaker 1: driver bands, because that's really where they're going. Even if
Speaker 1: cars exist as a ban, ownership as a man on
Speaker 1: you having the freedom to go wherever you want and
Speaker 1: being able to drive, and you know they're talking about
Speaker 1: him being average is more than a decade old. That's
Speaker 1: certainly the case in the United States as well. I
Speaker 1: think when I looked at it. It was something like
Speaker 1: the average age was twelve or thirteen years or something
Speaker 1: like that. Our cars that are twelve or thirteen years old,
Speaker 1: we have no intention of getting rid of them. We're
Speaker 1: going to try to keep them running. And I, you know,
Speaker 1: I'll pay to keep them running rather than get rid
Speaker 1: of them for something newer, because I don't like the
Speaker 1: complexities of the new stuff. I don't like, oh, the
Speaker 1: nanny tech that I talk about all the time with
Speaker 1: Eric Peters. So yeah, the average car in the US
Speaker 1: twelve or thirteen years old. And I said, when I
Speaker 1: mentioned that a few years ago, I said, I remember
Speaker 1: in the nineteen seventies, Volvo had an add campaign talking
Speaker 1: about how their cars at the time average age was
Speaker 1: eleven years old. It wasn't that the Volvos who were
Speaker 1: made that well so that people were poor because of socialism.
Speaker 1: They couldn't afford to buy a newer car. They would
Speaker 1: like to have a newer car, but they couldn't afford
Speaker 1: it because of socialism. That's where we are today. And
Speaker 1: of course they're also the government has gotten into the
Speaker 1: business of telling us what we must have, what we
Speaker 1: must have, what we cannot have. It most people don't
Speaker 1: like what we must have anyway, it's gotten incredibly and
Speaker 1: ridiculously expensive. People are definitely spending money to keep their
Speaker 1: cars on the road as opposed to upgrading. They said
Speaker 1: in the UK, the majority just want a car that
Speaker 1: gets them from A to B. The average car now
Speaker 1: nine point four years of age in the UK. That's
Speaker 1: a forty two percent rise from two thousand and three,
Speaker 1: when the average age of the car was six point
Speaker 1: six years. They know that down the road there won't
Speaker 1: be a choice of petrol, so they're thinking, well, this
Speaker 1: could be my last one, so I will keep it longer.
Speaker 1: That's one way to react to all this stuff. Maybe
Speaker 1: one of the other ways that we could do it
Speaker 1: is tell these people to stuff it, lease people to
Speaker 1: stop with the green grift, tell them to stop the
Speaker 1: Paris Climate Accord, which is the basis of all of
Speaker 1: this stuff. If we don't stop the Paris Climate Acord,
Speaker 1: we lose even the power to heat our homes. We
Speaker 1: won't even be able to afford to heat our homes,
Speaker 1: let alone have a car. And yet they will rearrange
Speaker 1: the deck chairs on the Titanic of the Paris Climate Cord. Well,
Speaker 1: we'll do this or we'll do that, or we'll we'll
Speaker 1: come up. Now, well, we'll let you use any kind
Speaker 1: of energy you want, says the Trump two point zero.
Speaker 1: Any kind of energy you want, but you just pay
Speaker 1: carbon taxes to my friends over here who paid for
Speaker 1: me to get into office. You're going to pay your
Speaker 1: carbon credits, You're going to do carbon capture and anything.
Speaker 1: You'll pay. But if you pay enough to me and
Speaker 1: my friends, you can use any kind of energy that
Speaker 1: you want. You just got to pay that indulgence. The
Speaker 1: number of shiny new cars sold to families and individuals
Speaker 1: has plummeted by almost four hundred and fifty thousand in
Speaker 1: the past eight years. They're killing the car business. It's
Speaker 1: not hard to see how the government is pulling all
Speaker 1: the stops out a discourage buying cars, even their beloved
Speaker 1: planet saving electric vehicles. They're even pulling the rug out
Speaker 1: from underneath that. And again, Eric Peters and I used
Speaker 1: to always talk about that. I said, yeah, people think
Speaker 1: that's the alternate. They don't want any privately owned cars,
Speaker 1: and they will eventually make it impossible for you to
Speaker 1: own them as well. It's all part of what seems
Speaker 1: like a wider policy to crash the economy. That's what
Speaker 1: it really is. It's a policy to crash the economy.
Speaker 1: Rachel Reeves announced in her maiden budget this is their
Speaker 1: labor official that is there her latest maiden budget, she
Speaker 1: put in a vehicle excise duty attacks and rates are
Speaker 1: going to be increasing from April. Listen to how much
Speaker 1: they're going to charge people with a tax, a specific
Speaker 1: tax on their cars, while bills for petrol and diesel
Speaker 1: and hybrid cars will rise by at least one hundred
Speaker 1: pounds and as much as two seven hundred and forty
Speaker 1: five pounds. Can you imagine that, you know, a levy
Speaker 1: attacks on you for and I don't know what that
Speaker 1: is in dollars, it's well over three thousand dollars. The
Speaker 1: appetite for Hatchbacks rather than SUVs is evident in the
Speaker 1: used car market in the UK. But people who want
Speaker 1: little cars like that as a runabout, but they're not
Speaker 1: making little sports cars anymore. So again, you know, when
Speaker 1: you whatever you want, oh you're not gonna you're not
Speaker 1: going to get that. They don't care what consumers want.
Speaker 1: That's another ongoing thing that Eric Peters and I have
Speaker 1: talked about for so long you know, why can't you
Speaker 1: just buy, you know, a cheap car. No, not going
Speaker 1: to do that. They're going to be guilded, as a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, so much so that Stillantis is destroying
Speaker 1: the Jeep, the Jeep brand by only selling cars that
Speaker 1: have every bell and whistle that they can think of.
Speaker 1: They've made it a really high end brand and that's
Speaker 1: not what their customer base is. But they don't care
Speaker 1: where their customer base is. They're going to dictate to
Speaker 1: you what you're going to buy. So they're going to
Speaker 1: bloat and they're going to decorate with all kinds of
Speaker 1: bells and whistles, and people just can't afford that well
Speaker 1: made cars, so two thousands of lasting longer. They're mechanically
Speaker 1: electronically simple, simpler than the newer cars. That's all true,
Speaker 1: and so is a part of this. Honda Nissan are
Speaker 1: working together on a merger, which is really strange. Before
Speaker 1: I read that, I want to read some of these
Speaker 1: comments here. Matthew Ronson says, kids bringing cased firearms on
Speaker 1: the bus when I was a kid. That's right, that's right.
Speaker 1: The firearms haven't changed. Our society has changed, our kids
Speaker 1: have changed. KWD sixty. Had to watch the senior sell
Speaker 1: a rifle to a boy in our front hallway at
Speaker 1: our high school when I was a freshman. Nobody thought
Speaker 1: about using it there. It stayed in the locker all day.
Speaker 1: A neighbor bought a new Toyota Tacoma and didn't make
Speaker 1: it home, brand new engine and it locked up. No
Speaker 1: new cars for me, he says, yeah, wow, and that's Toyota,
Speaker 1: one of the better ones. Fisher twenty twenty four. I
Speaker 1: have a nineteen ninety nine vehicle still going strong. Yes,
Speaker 1: that's right. Yeah, that's part of the problem. They started.
Speaker 1: They had to compete not just on fins and chrome,
Speaker 1: but they had to compete on reliability, and they got
Speaker 1: very good at that. So they have to shut this
Speaker 1: whole thing down. So what's going on with Honda Nissan.
Speaker 1: I looked at this and I thought, well, I said,
Speaker 1: it's going to make the world's third largest automaker. And
Speaker 1: when you look at this, the question is why why
Speaker 1: would they do this? As a matter of fact, Handa's
Speaker 1: president said, well, frankly speaking, the possibility that's not being
Speaker 1: implemented is not zero the double negative there. In other words,
Speaker 1: this may not happen, he said, and the question is
Speaker 1: why would they even do this. On Monday, the two companies,
Speaker 1: Honda and Nissan announced that they'd signed a memorandum of
Speaker 1: understanding to integrate their businesses, with Mitsubishi Motors also joining
Speaker 1: the discussions. I liked Nissan much better when it was
Speaker 1: Dotson and I had Z and all the rest of
Speaker 1: those that came on after that. Travis sold it, but
Speaker 1: he had at one point in time. It was it's
Speaker 1: actually his first car that he bought was a Nithsan
Speaker 1: three hundred ZX twin turbo, and that thing was a
Speaker 1: blast to drive. I mean, it was old, it had
Speaker 1: all kinds of body integrity issues and everything, but the
Speaker 1: engine was still going strong and it could really push
Speaker 1: in the back of the seat, and it was a
Speaker 1: great handling car too. But it was you they had
Speaker 1: started at that point in time with that car that
Speaker 1: had a lot of just the fact that had twin turbos,
Speaker 1: But then they had other things that were going on
Speaker 1: with the suspension that were complications that you know, but
Speaker 1: it was a fun car to have. Facing competition from
Speaker 1: electric vehicle leaders like Tesla and China's BYD Japanese automakers
Speaker 1: are uniting to cut costs and to listen to this
Speaker 1: accelerate their transition to electric vehicles and to bankruptcy. If
Speaker 1: they're merging so that they can make electric vehicles, they're
Speaker 1: on their way. They're speeding towards bankruptcy. And that's the
Speaker 1: point that Eric Peters makes with us. He talks about this,
Speaker 1: and there's an article that he put up yesterday. The
Speaker 1: AP writes that a potential merger between Honda, Nissan, and
Speaker 1: also Mitsubishi could create an automotive giant valued at over
Speaker 1: fifty billion dollars, helping them to come pete with industry
Speaker 1: leaders like Toyota and Volkswagen. Toyota collaborates with Mazda and
Speaker 1: with Subaru, and they produced eleven and a half million
Speaker 1: vehicles in twenty twenty three, far surpassing the combined output
Speaker 1: of these three companies Honda, Mitsubishi and Nissan. Their combined
Speaker 1: output was eight million vehicles. Toyota by itself eleven and
Speaker 1: a half. Of course, that may also include their collaborations
Speaker 1: with Mazda, but anyway, Reports earlier this month suggested Taiwan's
Speaker 1: Fox con was interested in acquiring Nissan shares Nissan is
Speaker 1: recovering from scandals and from recent losses and has cut
Speaker 1: jobs and restructured and undercurrent management. But again, Eric Peters
Speaker 1: writes and ep Autos or Expeter's autos dot comedy says,
Speaker 1: why would Honda buy Nissan? Honda is healthy and it's
Speaker 1: considering buying Nissan, which is not healthy. He's just a
Speaker 1: couple weeks ago, senior person within Nissan's hierarchy said the
Speaker 1: company had twelve to fourteen months to survive circling the drain.
Speaker 1: He says, that's not healthy. It's just I have dead
Speaker 1: So why would Honda put itself in that position by
Speaker 1: doing what amounts to chaining itself to a dead man walking?
Speaker 1: Hana has been very smart so far and that it
Speaker 1: has avoided the mal investment of a battery powered and
Speaker 1: he calls them not vehicles, not cars, or Peters calls
Speaker 1: him devices devices. They're like smartphones. They got bells and whistles,
Speaker 1: and they got iPads glued to the dashboard their devices.
Speaker 1: They have avoided the mal investment of battery powered devices.
Speaker 1: That has left companies such as Nissan that didn't avoid
Speaker 1: that has left them within months at most to survive
Speaker 1: Honda currently sells only two devices, and they are rebadged
Speaker 1: versions of another company's devices, the Honda Prologue and its
Speaker 1: Accura badged Stablemate, being in fact Chevy devices that GM
Speaker 1: mal invested in. GM spent the money designing and proofing
Speaker 1: out the device that Honda tweaked a little bit cosmetically.
Speaker 1: The expensive stuff was paid for by GM. On the
Speaker 1: other hand, he said Nissan has destroyed its brand in
Speaker 1: part by malinvesting in devices such as the Nissan Leaf,
Speaker 1: the first electric car, and the Aria if he pronounced
Speaker 1: it that one, I don't know, it's matter right. The
Speaker 1: Nissan Leaf that was one of the earliest of the
Speaker 1: evs and first time I ever heard about an EV
Speaker 1: burning a house down was in North Carolina and it
Speaker 1: was a Nissan Leaf as it was being recharged. He
Speaker 1: says this hasn't worked for any car company that has
Speaker 1: thought it was a good idea stopped making cars and
Speaker 1: the switchover to devices. The ones that did are all
Speaker 1: in trouble, even VW, which was once one of the
Speaker 1: most successful brands, but it was We've talked about that
Speaker 1: a lot. It was coursed into doing that because they
Speaker 1: came out with incredibly high fuel economy, diesels that lasted forever,
Speaker 1: that were economical, and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 1: And so the EPA basically put them out of business
Speaker 1: claiming that they cheated on an emission scandal. Never done
Speaker 1: that before. And again, EPA is not just going to
Speaker 1: kill Volkswagen. The EPA is going to kill us if
Speaker 1: we let them. It's the EPA that has taken the
Speaker 1: lead in terms of shutting down now even power stations
Speaker 1: that are on the grid. And of course the Department
Speaker 1: of Energy is out there to tell you what appliances
Speaker 1: and heaters and things like that you can have in
Speaker 1: the name of efficiency. So, as I've said before, the
Speaker 1: best thing to do, which is not going to happen,
Speaker 1: is to get rid of the EPA and the Department
Speaker 1: of Energy, two things that were created in nineteen seventies
Speaker 1: that need to go. But that's not going to happen. Instead,
Speaker 1: if they would get rid of the single Act that
Speaker 1: was put in and about the time of their creation
Speaker 1: that said that the government was going to start mandating
Speaker 1: efficiency as well as emission standards. Remove that piece of
Speaker 1: legislation that was never within the power of Congress to
Speaker 1: give to anybody. It's not in the Constitution. Where in
Speaker 1: the Constitution does it say that the federal government will
Speaker 1: measure efficiency and air quality? Nowhere Those powers don't exist
Speaker 1: in the Constitution, so they're not the Congress powers to
Speaker 1: give to anyone, to delegate to anyone, any bureaucracy. That
Speaker 1: act needs to go. They're not going to do that though,
Speaker 1: just like the fundamental thing that Paris Climate accord needs
Speaker 1: to go. But they're not going to do that either.
Speaker 1: Nissan also is given up on the Maxima, and soon
Speaker 1: they will give up on the Ultima. Nissan also turned
Speaker 1: the compact sized Frontier that it used to sell and huge,
Speaker 1: huge numbers because the little truck was cheap and it
Speaker 1: was rugged, and so it is exactly what lots of
Speaker 1: people want in a truck. They turned that into a big,
Speaker 1: expensive truck that lots of people don't want and can't afford.
Speaker 1: Same thing that Stillantis has done with a cheap taking
Speaker 1: something that was cheap and rugged and turned it into
Speaker 1: something that people don't want can't afford. The brand's Infinity
Speaker 1: division is just as dead in the water as a Titanic.
Speaker 1: So again, what is in it for Honda? Writes Eric
Speaker 1: he says, what's to be gained here? Well? A CNBC
Speaker 1: article headline says top Japanese carmakers Nissan Motors and Honda
Speaker 1: Motors understood it be exploring a blockbuster merger again that
Speaker 1: same phrase, in order to stay competitive on the road
Speaker 1: to full electrification. He says, what do they think lies
Speaker 1: down that road to full electrification at bankruptcy and why
Speaker 1: they're doing it? Well, because China. The car business is
Speaker 1: a global business, and China is a much bigger market
Speaker 1: than North America and European markets. In China, there is
Speaker 1: a huge market for battery powered devices because the Chinese
Speaker 1: government allows a sale of inexpensive battery powered devices that
Speaker 1: cannot legally be sold in North America or Europe. And
Speaker 1: not only that, but they can make them more cheaply
Speaker 1: they're going to sell when they sell their cars. They
Speaker 1: won't be that cheap when they get to America. I
Speaker 1: mean they'll jack the price up, but there they can
Speaker 1: sell them more cheaply because they don't have as much
Speaker 1: invested in them. They've got a monopoly on a lot
Speaker 1: of the materials that are there is Eric Peters talks
Speaker 1: about here, But the main thing that nobody talks about.
Speaker 1: Even though people will talk about how China has started
Speaker 1: withdrawing minerals and things like that, the main thing is
Speaker 1: that they have essentially a monopoly on power power that
Speaker 1: is used for manufacturing things, all things that's been given
Speaker 1: to them, and that is the pair's climate accord. So
Speaker 1: they said, again, if they put all three of these together,
Speaker 1: it would be just behind Toyota in terms of size
Speaker 1: and just behind Germany. And crisis stricken Volkswagen. That was
Speaker 1: the phrase that was used by the news article that
Speaker 1: he has, And he says, so why they use that
Speaker 1: phrase crisis stricken Volkswagen. What was the crisis that struck them?
Speaker 1: What was the electrification? Their decision made under duress to
Speaker 1: take the road two fall electrification, that's what brought on
Speaker 1: their crisis. Now Honda seems to be wanting to ride
Speaker 1: shotgun with Nissan and drive down that same road. Well,
Speaker 1: here's the thing, this is my comment on all this stuff.
Speaker 1: They think that they can pull this stuff together and
Speaker 1: make a bigger company, try to get economies of scale
Speaker 1: or something to try to compete with China. But there's
Speaker 1: no way that they're going to be able to do
Speaker 1: it because of the Paris Climate Core, China is allowed
Speaker 1: to build and they're doing it at an amazing rate,
Speaker 1: several new coal power plants a week, and already they
Speaker 1: use about half the world's coal, and there's no limits
Speaker 1: on that, there's no cleanup required on That tell me
Speaker 1: that these people believe that we're all going to die
Speaker 1: if we have coal power, and they let China do this.
Speaker 1: Their plants are far dirtier than ours, and India as well.
Speaker 1: It's a couple of years yars Ago I was talking
Speaker 1: about India and the fact that they're allowed to have
Speaker 1: highly polluting power plants, so much so that if you
Speaker 1: were to drive an electric car powered by those dirty
Speaker 1: power plants, you would be having less emissions as they
Speaker 1: measure it, if you had a gas car that got
Speaker 1: thirty seven miles per gallon. And so they're allowed to
Speaker 1: do this, and they're being given a monopoly on heavy
Speaker 1: manufacturing because of the Paris so called treaty that was
Speaker 1: never ratified here in the United States. It's just like
Speaker 1: the solar panels, the solar panels that we all buy
Speaker 1: from China now because they've got a monopoly and they
Speaker 1: can do it cheaper than anybody else because they've got
Speaker 1: cheap energy. The solar panels that we get from China
Speaker 1: are made using coal energy, So they burn coal to
Speaker 1: power their factories that make the solar panels, and they
Speaker 1: burn coal to power the factories that make the electric vehicles.
Speaker 1: So you have coal made solar panels and coal made
Speaker 1: evs and that's the way that it's going to be
Speaker 1: unless somebody wakes up. Now, what could happen with all
Speaker 1: of this stuff? How do you undo that? If the
Speaker 1: United States were to say, if Trump, which he would
Speaker 1: not do in his first term, I would say, we
Speaker 1: were never in the Paris Climate Court. He pretended that
Speaker 1: we were legitimately in it, even though it was self ratified,
Speaker 1: said John Carey. He said, yeah, Brock and Eye just
Speaker 1: self ratified it. Well, that's not the way it works.
Speaker 1: And you know, I criticized Trump for doing it, but
Speaker 1: every single senator should have said something about it. Ran
Speaker 1: Paul should have said something about it, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee,
Speaker 1: all of these so called conservative center they should have said,
Speaker 1: that's not the way the constitution works. Any treaty has
Speaker 1: to be ratify by the Senate. Nobody said that. Nobody
Speaker 1: for ten years, no Republican or Democrat has said this
Speaker 1: treaty must be ratified by the Senate. Why because they
Speaker 1: all want to. Saint Mitch McConnell one of the worst
Speaker 1: ones about all this stuff, because he was the Senate
Speaker 1: Majority leader for many of those years, and so nobody
Speaker 1: has ever called the bluff. Instead, they pretended that they
Speaker 1: were in it. And if they were in it, there
Speaker 1: was a clause, so you've got to wait four years
Speaker 1: to get out of it. But if if Trump would
Speaker 1: get out of the Paris Climate Accord, this house of
Speaker 1: cards would come crashing down, folks, because China and India
Speaker 1: are not in it in the sense that they can
Speaker 1: do whatever they want. Yes, they're technically in the Paris
Speaker 1: Climate Accord because it gives them an advantage, but they
Speaker 1: can do whatever they want. The restrictions are on America
Speaker 1: and Europe. And if America pulled out, Europe would say,
Speaker 1: wait a minute, what's the point of this. We've got China, India,
Speaker 1: and the US very able to do whatever they want.
Speaker 1: We're not going to follow into these restrictions. If Trump
Speaker 1: would pull out of the Paris Climate Accord, it would
Speaker 1: come crashing down because the Europeans would get out of
Speaker 1: it as well. If Trump would get out of the
Speaker 1: Paris Climate Accord, he could save not only America, but
Speaker 1: he could save Germany and the UK and France and
Speaker 1: all these other places. But he won't do it. I
Speaker 1: guarantee you he will not do it. Did do it
Speaker 1: the first time. If they're going to pretend that we
Speaker 1: are in it and pretend to abide by the restrictions
Speaker 1: to get out of it, it's going to be another
Speaker 1: headfake for four years. By the way, when you look
Speaker 1: at Nissan, there is a Nissan stadium that is here
Speaker 1: in Tennessee and Nashville, another example of grift and graft
Speaker 1: and corruption. There was a special referendum going back to
Speaker 1: nineteen ninety six and voters in the metropolitan Nashville area
Speaker 1: voted to approve partial funding of the proposed stadium. The vote,
Speaker 1: which was which allocated one hundred and forty four million
Speaker 1: dollars worth of public money to the project, passed with
Speaker 1: a sixty percent majority. And when they had the referendum,
Speaker 1: they called it the NFL Yes campaign, and the people
Speaker 1: who are running that side of it, pushing for the
Speaker 1: subsidies outspent the anti stadium group by a ratio of
Speaker 1: sixteen to one during the campaign, very much like every election. Right,
Speaker 1: it's very easy to outspend your opponents. If you've got
Speaker 1: a lot of money, like Musk or any of these
Speaker 1: people are like Soros or whatever, you can pour this
Speaker 1: money into your campaign, into your side because you know
Speaker 1: you've got to get paid back on the other side. Oh,
Speaker 1: they always get nearly one thousand to one return on
Speaker 1: their investment, right, and I mean not one thousand percent,
Speaker 1: I mean a thousand to one return on their investment.
Speaker 1: So these people won the stadium subsidized spend heavily sixteen
Speaker 1: to one against the people will say, wait a minute,
Speaker 1: not with my money. You're not going to build a
Speaker 1: stadium for billionaires with my money. But that's the way
Speaker 1: it works in every election, isn't it. The crony capitalism
Speaker 1: of these NFL stadiums, these other stadiums. Just one example,
Speaker 1: maybe the easiest for people to see in twenty fifteen
Speaker 1: is when Nissan got involved. Their North American headquarters are
Speaker 1: just south of Nashville, and they've got a manufacturing plant
Speaker 1: nearby as well, and so they bought the naming rights
Speaker 1: for the stadium in twenty and fifteen in a twenty
Speaker 1: year contract rebranding the stadium as Nissan Stadium, and they
Speaker 1: put a twenty sixteen Nissan Titan pickup truck next to
Speaker 1: the stadium scoreboard. Well, the interesting thing is I looked
Speaker 1: it up to see if they still make this particular truck,
Speaker 1: the Nissan Titan. Yeah, they do. The base now, however,
Speaker 1: is forty seven thousand dollars. And I wonder what they're
Speaker 1: gonna do. Well, well, they call the stadium when Nissan
Speaker 1: is gone. They still got ten years of that twenty
Speaker 1: year name purchase that they put on there. And then
Speaker 1: when we look at Tesla, Tesla's market cap, in other words,
Speaker 1: the price of their shares times the number of shares outstanding.
Speaker 1: Their market cap is nearly half of the global auto
Speaker 1: industry that won company. Tesla's shares just reach an all
Speaker 1: new high following Trump's victory because he just liked the stadium.
Speaker 1: People understand how crony capitalism, crony corruption works. They knew
Speaker 1: that he was going to get his money, you know,
Speaker 1: just like the people who do the stadium going to
Speaker 1: get their money. Tesla AC counts for nearly half of
Speaker 1: the market capitalization of all car makers, all car makers,
Speaker 1: I mean even little obscure ones in foreign countries that you,
Speaker 1: as an American have never heard of. I've never heard
Speaker 1: of them. Its valuation surpasses the combined value of the
Speaker 1: next twenty nine auto makers, and yet when you look
Speaker 1: at the number of cars that they're shipping, it's a
Speaker 1: fraction of what Toyota sells. For example, Tesla's massive market
Speaker 1: cap is not reflected in its production numbers. In twenty
Speaker 1: twenty three, Tesla sold one point eight million vehicles. Well,
Speaker 1: Toyota sold eleven point two million, and yet the market
Speaker 1: cap between these two Tesla one point four trillion and
Speaker 1: Toyota two hundred and thirty one billion. So Tesla's stock
Speaker 1: is valued six times higher than Toyota, even though Toyota
Speaker 1: sold six times more vehicles than Tesla did. It's all
Speaker 1: about expectation. We'll talk about a bubble mindset, but it's
Speaker 1: not even really about the bubble. Isn't that the people, Oh,
Speaker 1: they've got some secret sauce and they've got the wave
Speaker 1: of the future. No, it is about the fact that
Speaker 1: people are betting on Elon Musk, owning Trump and getting
Speaker 1: whatever he wants from the Trump administration. You know, the
Speaker 1: market is telling you. You know what we all see there.
Speaker 1: Investors believe musk close relationship with Trump, along with his
Speaker 1: growing role in government, will serve as a powerful catalyst
Speaker 1: for TESLA. They're betting on corruption, folks, because corruption in
Speaker 1: the district of corruption is a sure thing. Why is
Speaker 1: it that everybody spends so much money on these election campaigns, Well,
Speaker 1: that's because that's where all the money is. Right, You're
Speaker 1: going to go rob a bank. Why do you rob banks? Well,
Speaker 1: that's where all the money is. Well, why do you participate?
Speaker 1: And why do you give all this money to politicians?
Speaker 1: Because that's where all the money is. And I can
Speaker 1: get a thousand times more money back by buying a
Speaker 1: politician KWD sixty eight. Cyber trucks will make great dumpsters
Speaker 1: when they die. They already look like a dumpster, don't they.
Speaker 1: It's just the most I mean, when you look at that,
Speaker 1: I just don't understand the mania over it. It's one
Speaker 1: of the worst looking childish things I've ever seen. The
Speaker 1: cyber truck soilent goy. I predict this this ev crap continues,
Speaker 1: America will resemble Cuba that's right. With everybody driving thirty
Speaker 1: to forty year old cars. That's right. And unfortunately in
Speaker 1: Cuba they're more colorful. If we freeze it at the
Speaker 1: early two thousands and everything, everything's going to be varying
Speaker 1: shades of gray, you know, white, black bearing shades of gray,
Speaker 1: and occasionally a red car. But it's it's not going
Speaker 1: to be the colorful stuff that you see in Cuba
Speaker 1: from the nineteen fifties. Kowalamo says, don't see how night
Speaker 1: drove a Miata in Austin with all the four by fours.
Speaker 1: It was an interesting experience. Yeah, you're taking your life
Speaker 1: in your hand.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 1: Every time I would go anywhere, I'm looking at the
Speaker 1: underside of other cars. You drive very defensively, and that's
Speaker 1: that's how you drive. Must have been driving like speed racers,
Speaker 1: zipping around like frogger. Yeah, that's right. Definitely in the
Speaker 1: mornings when I would go to work. That was that
Speaker 1: was the only silver lining about the so called pandemic
Speaker 1: was that people got off the roads even and I
Speaker 1: was driving around with the top down and and it
Speaker 1: was kind of a strange sense of deja vu that
Speaker 1: I got naft for a while I thought, why is it,
Speaker 1: why does this seem so familiar in a different way?
Speaker 1: And I thought about it, It's like it's because the
Speaker 1: traffic density is what I was used to driving in Tampa,
Speaker 1: you know, fifty sixty years earlier, and uh so fifty
Speaker 1: years early. Not quite that old, I guess, but anyway,
Speaker 1: and it was really nice, especially at four am in
Speaker 1: the morning, because the cops definitely were not out giving
Speaker 1: tickets at that point in time. Soylent Gooy says, give
Speaker 1: me a nineteen eighty three Toyota pickup and I'll make
Speaker 1: it last fifty years. That's right, especially if it's a
Speaker 1: highlux that Eric Peters had talked about many times in
Speaker 1: on top Gear. That was one of their episodes. They
Speaker 1: took a Toyota high Lox, which we were never allowed
Speaker 1: to have here in the US, and they did everything
Speaker 1: they could to destroy this thing, and it just kept running.
Speaker 1: I mean, finally, I think they destroyed it by driving
Speaker 1: it into the sea, you know, and then they put
Speaker 1: it up in the studio their top Gear if you
Speaker 1: remember that. But yeah, the legendary Toyota Highlux. The diesel
Speaker 1: version was even even better, but we're not allowed to
Speaker 1: have that here, and you know, all that diesel stuff
Speaker 1: that was happening, that was that was a design by
Speaker 1: the EPA. And when we were in North Carolina right
Speaker 1: there and Research Triangle Park, they had a big EPA
Speaker 1: facility there and it was what was his name's got
Speaker 1: junk Science and he found Steve molloy found that they
Speaker 1: were just kind of came across it looking at some
Speaker 1: of their papers and he saw that some people had
Speaker 1: to be taken to the hospital. Looks at what is
Speaker 1: this about? And he found that they were looking for
Speaker 1: people who had respiratory and heart issues. They exposed them
Speaker 1: the high levels of diesel particulates. I mean they literally
Speaker 1: hooked them up to the tailpipe. They did filter out
Speaker 1: the carbon monoxide, so they didn't kill them straight off,
Speaker 1: but they were looking to get these people sick so
Speaker 1: that they could increase the restrictions on diesel and on
Speaker 1: fireplaces that they want to ban fireplaces and barbecue grills
Speaker 1: and everything. And that was back in twenty twelve and
Speaker 1: they're still working on that. And what they were doing
Speaker 1: was they were exposing people to seventy two times the
Speaker 1: EPA limit. And as that was all happening, you had
Speaker 1: Obama's EPA had Lisa Jackson saying, we're not talking about
Speaker 1: people getting sick, We're talking about people dying. And more
Speaker 1: people are dying from fine particulate matter than from cancer
Speaker 1: and heart disease. See, they tell the same lies, whether
Speaker 1: they're talking about climate or whether they're talking about COVID.
Speaker 1: It's always the same lives. That's why, you know, when
Speaker 1: all this stuff was happening in the spring of twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: and I walk out one day as I'm finished and
Speaker 1: I'm going home, and it was in the afternoon, and
Speaker 1: Mike Adams was on and he was reading the latest
Speaker 1: propaganda from the CDC and reading it not to debunk it,
Speaker 1: but telling people, look at this, look at how bad
Speaker 1: this is. The CDC says more people are dying from
Speaker 1: COVID than from heart disease and cancer. And it's like,
Speaker 1: come on, you know better than that. You're better than that.
Speaker 1: You should be better than that than the light of
Speaker 1: people about that kind of stuff. Dustin Helm, thank you
Speaker 1: very much for the tip. I appreciate that MAGA made.
Speaker 1: One says when the electric like Tesla and GM and
Speaker 1: now Ford are subsidized by our tax money, the only
Speaker 1: way the others will survive will be to merge. Well,
Speaker 1: that's the other part of it, you know, talking about
Speaker 1: the connection of Nissan here, our Rhino governor here in Tennessee,
Speaker 1: Bill Lee, heavily subsidized Ford in terms of putting batteries
Speaker 1: and electric car thing. And now you know, I don't
Speaker 1: know what happens to that, because they've announced that they're
Speaker 1: cutting back significantly because it's bankrupting Ford. If they're going
Speaker 1: to continue down this road to electrification, it's going to
Speaker 1: wind up being the electric chair for these for these
Speaker 1: car companies that want to sit on that KWD sixty A.
Speaker 1: Toyota has announced a basic truck supposed to sell for
Speaker 1: thirteen thousand dollars basically in old type parts, no turbo,
Speaker 1: no plastic oil pans, water pumps, iPads on the fast.
Speaker 1: It'll sell very well. I hope we're allowed to buy
Speaker 1: it here. See, that's the other thing you've got. The
Speaker 1: federal regulations is not just the emissions and from the EPA,
Speaker 1: but it's also the National Highway Traffic Safety Knits Association
Speaker 1: or bureaucracy or whatever and their safety standards. That's one
Speaker 1: of the key things is why When a lot of
Speaker 1: people come up with independent cars, they make them three
Speaker 1: wheel because if they're three wheels, then they can escape
Speaker 1: some of these safety regulations. I mean, they can still
Speaker 1: put them back in, and some of them do. But
Speaker 1: you've had several people who've not been able to get
Speaker 1: to market, really, but they still tried with the three
Speaker 1: wheel vehicles, trying to get around those safety requirements. Am Sellers.
Speaker 1: My husband works directly with Nissan. They've been making his
Speaker 1: life a living hell. The last few weeks. They are
Speaker 1: complete more. Yeah, that's interesting, don't frag me. Bro says
Speaker 1: owning a car at a young age for the masses
Speaker 1: is very Americana experience that many do not understand. That's right, Bolly,
Speaker 1: I tell you it was the type of thing talking
Speaker 1: about Christmas and I think back to a bicycle I
Speaker 1: get for Christmas. But it was really in my mind
Speaker 1: it was just you know, training wheels for a car.
Speaker 1: That bicycle got me a larger range. And of course
Speaker 1: I guess today you know, the got to keep the
Speaker 1: kids in the house or they call CPS on you, right,
Speaker 1: But I mean I arranged all over the place on
Speaker 1: my bicycle and I just couldn't wait for the day
Speaker 1: that I could get a car, and so I started
Speaker 1: plotting how I was going to get a motorcycle because
Speaker 1: I could get that at an earlier age and for
Speaker 1: less money than I could get a car. But my
Speaker 1: parents weren't having that, so I had to wait until
Speaker 1: I got older to get a risky two seater sports car.
Speaker 1: MAGA made ones this Honda is going hydrogen. Well, there
Speaker 1: you go. I mean, but see that's the other part
Speaker 1: of it. The governments don't want hydrogen, and it's still
Speaker 1: it's got a lot of issues with the development. But
Speaker 1: so the electric battery car got a lot of issues.
Speaker 1: All these things have issues, but hydrogen doesn't give them
Speaker 1: what they want, and that is to have you tethered
Speaker 1: to a grid, a control grid, a power grid. That's
Speaker 1: why they keep pushing for the battery stuff. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of different things that they could do.
Speaker 1: They could do hydrogen, they could do fuel cells or whatever.
Speaker 1: You can make zero emission cars in a lot of
Speaker 1: different ways, but the governments want you on the grid.
Speaker 1: As they're taking the grid down, the EPA is taking
Speaker 1: down the power plants. Right. Overture says, Now the cars
Speaker 1: are not only boring, but they bark orders at you.
Speaker 1: I hate that, Yeah, I hate that. When we moved here,
Speaker 1: we got a we rented a truck and setting up
Speaker 1: really high and the thing's really wide. I mean, you
Speaker 1: talk about the strange experience going from a meada to
Speaker 1: moving truck that was moving that I was driving, and
Speaker 1: if it would get even close to the and when
Speaker 1: it wasn't a car coming, I would get kind of
Speaker 1: close to the center line and it would constantly is
Speaker 1: barking at me and jerking the steering wheel. It's like,
Speaker 1: what is this thing? So I go? If you can't go,
Speaker 1: if you can't work on it at home, it probably sucks.
Speaker 1: Atomic dog hont has been sinking as well. Their car
Speaker 1: is becoming unreliable. The cannabis Kinnoisseur says, you can't even
Speaker 1: change the oil in the new vehicles.
Speaker 2: Is that right?
Speaker 1: Wow? Not surprising, I guess, don't frag me Bro says
Speaker 1: all car and truck makers are being purposely destroyed because
Speaker 1: you will own nothing. That's right. That's what it's really about.
Speaker 1: It's about taking down the economy, taking down our industry.
Speaker 1: And again it comes back to the Paris Climate Court
Speaker 1: as well. That is very important, which is that is
Speaker 1: the ultimate goal. When we see things like Volkswagen going bankrupt,
Speaker 1: that is penultimate right. They want that to happen, But
Speaker 1: their ultimate goal is to take down all manufacturing and
Speaker 1: to take down our society Naburu twenty twenty nine. The
Speaker 1: fastest and easiest way to force those who can afford
Speaker 1: them drivers into evs is to monopolize multiple combustion vehicle
Speaker 1: manufacturers and only one choice for the buyer. Yeah, they're
Speaker 1: all consolidating. That is also another sign of a dying
Speaker 1: industry Ephesian six twelve. EV push designed to topple the
Speaker 1: car industry, isn't it yep, Tom mcdog, I can see
Speaker 1: in twenty years will be no longer car ownership, just robotaxis.
Speaker 1: It'll start out cheap and within a few years it'll
Speaker 1: cost a fortune. This is what Elon Musk is saying.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's actually said that you won't be driving
Speaker 1: cars in a couple of years. You're not going to
Speaker 1: be driving cars. You'll be paying Elon Musk. This guy
Speaker 1: is such a megalomaniac. Isn't it amazing how maga people
Speaker 1: cannot see it, can't see it at all. Truly is amazing.
Speaker 1: Carlomos says Toyota is merging on products of BMW and Portie.
Speaker 1: Toyota will rule the world hydrogen and battery. Octo spook.
Speaker 1: There isn't a car left on the market which inspires
Speaker 1: me to want it. I think that's the real plan.
Speaker 1: Have only cars and vehicles available which nobody wants. I
Speaker 1: feel the same way. Well, to look at it a
Speaker 1: Syrian girl, we need to deregulate and lower taxes on
Speaker 1: we the people, as well as industries in order to
Speaker 1: make the USA constitutional republic again. I agree. I agree. Well,
Speaker 1: let's we're going to take a quick break and we
Speaker 1: come back. We're going to talk about an insane decision
Speaker 1: out of the Montana Supreme Court. And well before we
Speaker 1: got a couple more comments here about the tech iq
Speaker 1: micro Dot says, how do you all too much Big
Speaker 1: Brother mandated tech built into today's cars? I would not
Speaker 1: want any car with so much remote tracking and operations,
Speaker 1: parameters and recording ability. And Fed's can shut you off,
Speaker 1: all right, they can kill the car. They can also
Speaker 1: shut off the power to everybody. Don't frag me. Bro
Speaker 1: says their game plan is old and predictable crash the economy,
Speaker 1: implement austerity and rationing, and offer war as a solution.
Speaker 1: That's right. So when you come back, we're going to
Speaker 1: take a look at this Montana Supreme Court decision, which
Speaker 1: is truly insane. We'll be right back.
Speaker 9: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
Speaker 9: these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
Speaker 9: all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
Speaker 9: And I could if only David Knight would send me
Speaker 9: one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
Speaker 9: black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But
Speaker 9: he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
Speaker 9: American suckers can buy me some at the Davidnightshow dot com,
Speaker 9: and David is giving a ten percent discount to listeners
Speaker 9: from now until twenty twenty five. At that price, you
Speaker 9: should be able to buy me several hundred. Those amazing
Speaker 9: sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful, I'd wear something
Speaker 9: other than green military cosplay to my various galas and
Speaker 9: social events. If you want to save on shipping, just
Speaker 9: put it in the next package of bombs and missiles
Speaker 9: coming from the USA.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 1: Well, I got one more thing I want to talk
Speaker 1: about with the climate nonsense before I get into Festivus.
Speaker 1: And it's kind of interesting to see what is going
Speaker 1: on with Ran Paul's report about waste that does this
Speaker 1: time of year. This is the Supreme Court of Montana.
Speaker 1: There were sixteen kids, children who sued. They filed a
Speaker 1: lawsuit against the state of Montana, and they claimed they
Speaker 1: had suffered stress because of environmental issues. I guess this
Speaker 1: is the how dare you lawsuit from Greta. Greta would
Speaker 1: be so proud of this, and Greta would be so
Speaker 1: proud of the insanity of this radical Supreme court. You
Speaker 1: talk about how only thirty five percent of the people
Speaker 1: trust the judiciary, this is exhibit A. They're completely out
Speaker 1: of touch. Most of these judges are political appointees. They're
Speaker 1: not even they don't stand for election. They're unaccountable, unelected
Speaker 1: for the majority of them. I don't know about the
Speaker 1: Montana Supreme Court, but the Montana Supreme Court says that
Speaker 1: the kids, yes, indeed, suffered environmental stress, and so they
Speaker 1: are going to make it expensive and impossible for adults
Speaker 1: to be able to get power because of that, The
Speaker 1: Montana Supreme Court sided with the sixteen kids who filed
Speaker 1: a suit in twenty twenty claiming climate changed caused them
Speaker 1: severe stress and anxiety. Grow up, Grow up. This thing
Speaker 1: should not have even been heard. And yet it's even worse.
Speaker 1: It's nearly a unanimous decision. The Montana Supreme Court sided
Speaker 1: with the kids six to one, six to one. They're
Speaker 1: rejected the state's argument the greenhouse gases released from Montana
Speaker 1: fossil fuel projects are minuscule on a global scale. That's right,
Speaker 1: because there's no IQ test for a judge eser, No,
Speaker 1: this is wanton ignorance. As a matter of fact, sense
Speaker 1: over eighty percent of the minerals needed for batteries or
Speaker 1: mind and refined and China, China is building coal power
Speaker 1: plants all over the places we talk about, and it's
Speaker 1: less than one half of one percent by their own standards. Again,
Speaker 1: when we talk about things and we talk about the
Speaker 1: imaginary CO two problem, where we talk about the imaginary
Speaker 1: virus problem, even if you look at it within their paradigm,
Speaker 1: none of this stuff holds up to scrutiny, even if
Speaker 1: you say that we're going to focus on global carbon
Speaker 1: dioxide emissions, that even if you say carbon dioxide is
Speaker 1: a problem and it's not, it's necessary for life, and
Speaker 1: carbon dioxide by their measurements, has gone up, but the
Speaker 1: temperature has not gone up. Michael Mann was wrong, seriously
Speaker 1: wrong about all of this stuff. That's one of these
Speaker 1: These models are busted. Their predictions are busted. But even
Speaker 1: if you go with the carbon dioxide emissions, Montana provides
Speaker 1: one half of one percent, So forget about it, kids,
Speaker 1: it's not an issue. And the judges, though, said well,
Speaker 1: we don't care if it's minuscule on a global scale.
Speaker 1: This is political activism writ large. There's no practical purpose
Speaker 1: for this, and they don't care. They're trying to set
Speaker 1: up a precedent, hoping that other courts will jump in
Speaker 1: with him and we'll all go down the Greta Thunberg road.
Speaker 1: They have a Republican governor there, Greg Gianforte, who said
Speaker 1: the state's still reviewing the decision, but warned of quote
Speaker 1: perpetual lawsuits that will waste taxpayer dollars and drive up
Speaker 1: energy bills, a law that he signed last year said
Speaker 1: environmental reviews may not consider climate impacts unless the federal
Speaker 1: government makes carbon dioxide a regulated pollutant. It's not a pollutant.
Speaker 1: But they say, well, unless the federal government says that
Speaker 1: it's a pollutant, you can't regulate something it's not a pollutean.
Speaker 1: The Montana Supreme Court threw that out, said that law
Speaker 1: is unconstitutional and we're going to side with the kids.
Speaker 1: So again, it's not a pllutant. It is necessary for life.
Speaker 1: So on December the fifth, the writer of this on
Speaker 1: zero Hedhead, I asked, dear Elon Musk, you're worth three
Speaker 1: hundred and thirty three billion boys, and about a five
Speaker 1: hundred billion. Now, why are you poisoning Austin's water?
Speaker 2: Uh?
Speaker 1: Huh? You want to talk about somebody that's concerned about
Speaker 1: the environment. You know, that's where he made his money
Speaker 1: with the Green Grift, and we talk about poisoning Austin's water.
Speaker 1: What he's talking about here, this is close to where
Speaker 1: we used to live, just outside of Austin, and we
Speaker 1: didn't realize it until we moved away. Until God has
Speaker 1: provided and blessed us so much that I'm not working
Speaker 1: for Alex and I'm not living next door to Elon
Speaker 1: Musk's polluting factories. He decided that he was just going
Speaker 1: to dump untreated water. He's got Boring is there, and
Speaker 1: he's also got another one of his companies. Two companies
Speaker 1: are headquartered there. And there were regulations for how he
Speaker 1: was supposed to do the road cuts, there were regulations
Speaker 1: about what he was supposed to do with water, and
Speaker 1: just said, mencare, now I'm going to do it this way.
Speaker 1: And so the Apartment Transportation and of course the County
Speaker 1: of Water people, they came after him. They fined him.
Speaker 1: It's like, I don't care. Just pay the fines. I
Speaker 1: don't care. It's nothing to him, nothing to him. Yeah. Again,
Speaker 1: this is a guy when he you know, back when
Speaker 1: his when his net worth was half of what it
Speaker 1: is today. I said, you compare his net worth with
Speaker 1: what the average Americans net worth is and his one
Speaker 1: hundred million dollar contribution that he was talking about at
Speaker 1: the time. Of course it wound up being more than that,
Speaker 1: but it one hundred million dollar contribution was like one
Speaker 1: hundred dollars from you or I from middle class Americans.
Speaker 1: And so when you look, that's one hundred million dollars
Speaker 1: is nothing to him. He doesn't care about the fines
Speaker 1: that they would enact on him in the county, and
Speaker 1: they don't care what the state is going to hit
Speaker 1: him with in terms of the roads. He just does
Speaker 1: whatever he wants. So this person says, so, Dearry Lawn Musk,
Speaker 1: why are you poisoning Austin's water? He says, Musk is
Speaker 1: not a champion of the environment. Tesla is a massive polluter.
Speaker 1: And they were just like a couple of miles down
Speaker 1: the road from where we lived. I didn't even know
Speaker 1: it until I saw articles about him setting up all
Speaker 1: this stuff.
Speaker 6: And.
Speaker 1: I was like, wait a minute, that's over there. He
Speaker 1: started that, I guess about nine months before we left,
Speaker 1: and I wasn't aware of it. I was too busy
Speaker 1: with a show. I didn't even go down that road anymore.
Speaker 1: Wasn't commuting November twenty first, twenty fourteen, trying to put
Speaker 1: export curbs on minerals that the UN needs for weapons
Speaker 1: and technology, and a warning shot to the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: And that was November the twenty first. By December, IID
Speaker 1: they didn't put limits on it. They just said complete
Speaker 1: ban on rare earth minerals used by US technology companies
Speaker 1: and the military. I mean, we look at some of
Speaker 1: these rare earth minerals. It's one of the things that
Speaker 1: lets them make super powerful magnets that are very lightweight.
Speaker 1: You know, people using headphones and a lot of other things.
Speaker 1: That's so many different technological uses for this. But they
Speaker 1: have cornered the market on the rare earth minerals. But
Speaker 1: what nobody talks about is the fact that they've been
Speaker 1: given a monopoly on cheap available energy with a pairs
Speaker 1: climate a cord. I keep coming back to that. That
Speaker 1: is a central problem. More dependents on China, more pollution
Speaker 1: for their effort, and the only byproduct of natural gas
Speaker 1: would be carbon dioxide and water, but not allowed to
Speaker 1: have that. We're gonna take a quick break. We'll be
Speaker 1: right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: I wish I had a.
Speaker 10: Christmas Night album. You can get the Christmas Night Album
Speaker 10: at the Davidnightshow dot com for just thirteen ninety nine.
Speaker 10: There's right in the second flour there say.
Speaker 11: What'd you wish, George.
Speaker 10: Well, not just one wish your little hat flog first,
Speaker 10: I'm going to the Davidnightshow dot Com and purchase the
Speaker 10: Christmas Night Album. Then I'm gonna listen to Christmas classics
Speaker 10: like are you gonna throw it on?
Speaker 3: I want the Christmas Night Album too.
Speaker 1: That's pretty good. Hello girls, can't you come out to me?
Speaker 3: Can't you come?
Speaker 10: David's Christmas Night Album includes twenty one instrumental Christmas melodies
Speaker 10: like God Rest You, Merry Gentlemen, Silent Night, and is
Speaker 10: all new I'll be home for Christmas?
Speaker 4: What do you want?
Speaker 10: You want the moon? Just say the word and I'll
Speaker 10: throw a lasshole around and pull it down.
Speaker 11: I'll take it and what and then I'll buy you
Speaker 11: your own download of David Knight's Christmas Night Album.
Speaker 1: Well before we get into Festivus, and we've got some
Speaker 1: amazing stuff that Ram Paul has found and well it's
Speaker 1: interesting and is disgusting at the same time. But I
Speaker 1: want to thank people who These are the checks that
Speaker 1: came in the third week of December, and the person
Speaker 1: at the top of the list is Marty, who did
Speaker 1: the matching funds. He also sent us a check and
Speaker 1: this is not the matching funds, this is Marty, So
Speaker 1: thank you very much. Marty. Do appreciate that, and yesterday
Speaker 1: was a very big day for us because of that
Speaker 1: and because of these checks coming in. Christopher M. Felicia,
Speaker 1: M Helen T, Lisa, Kay, Joshua, B. Super Fae and Brandon,
Speaker 1: thank you very much. Good to see you there. And
Speaker 1: they sent a card and let me cover up. Let's
Speaker 1: see is this is a chicken taking a nap on
Speaker 1: Brandon's shoulder there. Karen loved that because he is so
Speaker 1: busy with chickens this year. It's amazing how busy she
Speaker 1: has with chickens. Tom and Nancy long term supporters, thank
Speaker 1: you so much for your generosity. And again they are
Speaker 1: homeschooling their kids. And they sent me what Abby and
Speaker 1: Sammy drew. They drew a picture for us here and
Speaker 1: a Christmas tree here. Thank you Abby and Sammy very much.
Speaker 1: And thank you Tom and Nancy, Jackie and Fred. I
Speaker 1: have a joke from Fred says, what did Santa's sleigh cost? Nothing?
Speaker 1: It was on the house and JR. Fabrications. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much. That was very kind, a real blessing. Thank you,
Speaker 1: Marilyn B. All of you, Marilynd B, Christopher P. Mike C,
Speaker 1: mary N Stacy and Fred pe and missus barb g
Speaker 1: thank you all of you. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: this is from Maryland B who says it's time for
Speaker 1: a fancy meal at a fancy restaurant with your lovely wife.
Speaker 1: Cash this silver dollar in and get going along with
Speaker 1: your stash. Thank you very much. And so it's been
Speaker 1: a real blessing to us all. And thank you so
Speaker 1: much all of you. I mean, we were thanks for
Speaker 1: gott to really slow start this month, but again with
Speaker 1: the mail that came in as well as the matching
Speaker 1: funds yesterday that Marty did, we got up to just
Speaker 1: a little over seven eighths, So thank you so much
Speaker 1: for doing that. And like I said at the beginning
Speaker 1: of the program, I was getting worried because not doing
Speaker 1: that many more live broadcasts. We'll probably do this as
Speaker 1: a rebroadcast to mark since a lot of people didn't
Speaker 1: think that we're going to be live today and I
Speaker 1: didn't tell people about it. I've gotten really slack about
Speaker 1: social media because I've been so highly shadow band there.
Speaker 1: I don't communicate things that well. But so tomorrow beew
Speaker 1: this program rebroadcast. On Thursday, we'll have a best of
Speaker 1: interviews and on Friday guard Goldsmith is going to be
Speaker 1: doing the show live next week. I will do New
Speaker 1: Year's Eve, but we're going to take off on New
Speaker 1: Year's Day Thursday. Tony will be Tony Ardbin would be
Speaker 1: joining us on Thursday. You'll be coming back. So let's
Speaker 1: talk a little bit about festival. This is Ram Paul.
Speaker 1: He does this every year and of course, if you remember,
Speaker 1: Festivus was a made up holiday from the Seinfeld Show.
Speaker 1: And he says, US government spending millions of dollars and
Speaker 1: one of the things that they're doing wasting is experiments
Speaker 1: torturing cats. Torturing cats, Ran Paul highlighted over trillion dollars
Speaker 1: in governmental waste. And of course they do not just
Speaker 1: torture cats. They also torture puppies. And I find that
Speaker 1: to be far more disturbing. The amount of money that
Speaker 1: they're wasting, that is far more disturbing. Do you realize
Speaker 1: that when we talk about serial killers and psychopaths and everything,
Speaker 1: most of them began by torturing small animals when they're
Speaker 1: children or when they're teens, and then they move on
Speaker 1: from that to killing people. And isn't it interesting that
Speaker 1: it is the Department of Defense and Aid where Fauci worked.
Speaker 1: The nih and plays like that are torturing puppies and
Speaker 1: torturing cats, and they have already moved on to killing us.
Speaker 1: These people are psychopaths. Psychopaths do this kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: I mean, would it be if we had the Nazis
Speaker 1: Joseph Mingola right, well, you know we got their report
Speaker 1: from me. He's out there torturing people and small children.
Speaker 1: But hey, he's not spending too much money. Okay, well
Speaker 1: that's good. We want efficient government, right, do we really?
Speaker 1: Is it just about making the trains run on time
Speaker 1: or does it matter where the trains are headed? Is
Speaker 1: it just about doing it efficiently? Or is torture wrong? So,
Speaker 1: according to the report, the Department of Defense spent ten
Speaker 1: point eight million dollars on what it describes as a
Speaker 1: quote Orwellian cat experience experiment. That was an experience for
Speaker 1: the cats. And this was done by DARPA. DARPA the
Speaker 1: people that are doing all kinds of occultic abuses of technology.
Speaker 1: Everything that DARPA does, it's just disgusting. And who do
Speaker 1: they work with the University of Pittsburgh. Does that ring
Speaker 1: a bell? That was where Fauci sent the baby parts
Speaker 1: of the babies that were murdered, murdered for hire. And again,
Speaker 1: Republicans don't want to go near this. Ram Paul's not
Speaker 1: going to mention it. And the Republicans, even Trump, who
Speaker 1: didn't know how to handle abortion, he was so upset
Speaker 1: that the Supreme Court finally he noticed that we have
Speaker 1: a tenth Amendment and they don't have the power to
Speaker 1: decide abortion laws. But he didn't know what to do.
Speaker 1: And I said, well, look, you had La La Harris,
Speaker 1: your opponent persecuted, not just prosecuted, but persecuted. The guy
Speaker 1: who exposed this murder for him planned parent had. Why
Speaker 1: don't you focus on that. That'd be the perfect way
Speaker 1: to define her. You want to talk about weaponization of
Speaker 1: the government, you want to talk about out of control
Speaker 1: prosecutions that are persecution. That was it right there, and
Speaker 1: do it on the issue that she wanted to build
Speaker 1: her campaign on. Of course, he you know, they selected
Speaker 1: him anyway, but if he wanted to defend against abortion,
Speaker 1: that was the gift right there, and they knew it.
Speaker 1: He even has promoted into his cabinet the lawyer for
Speaker 1: David de Leiden and the Center for Medical Progress Harmeat Dylan.
Speaker 1: He actually promoted her, she was defending him, so that
Speaker 1: was something. But anyway, the parts that fauci was buying,
Speaker 1: again it was not DARPA, but it was fauci I
Speaker 1: was working with planned parented murder babies and send the
Speaker 1: parts to the University of Pittsburgh and to use that
Speaker 1: to create humanize mice. And we found that because of
Speaker 1: the prosecution by La La hilarious that would not have
Speaker 1: been known if they hadn't prosecuted David de Lighton. But
Speaker 1: it came to light and no GOP politicians will talk
Speaker 1: about it, none of them, and the MAGA media won't
Speaker 1: talk about it either. But this experiment by DARPA, and
Speaker 1: maybe who knows, maybe Fauciu was part of this as well.
Speaker 1: The guy was making twice as much money as he
Speaker 1: was legally allowed to make, so I don't know. Maybe
Speaker 1: he's working, as I've said before, for DARPA. Maybe he's
Speaker 1: pulling a salary from DARPA as well as from NIAID. Anyway,
Speaker 1: this experiment by DARPA in the University of Pittsburgh involved
Speaker 1: slicing the back of male cats, exposing their spinal cords.
Speaker 1: But it gets worse. Researchers then used electrodes, which fired
Speaker 1: off electric shocks while the incision was still open to
Speaker 1: make the cats have an erection. This is beyond the money.
Speaker 1: These are sick psychopaths. Sick psychopaths. Fauci is a psychopath.
Speaker 1: DARPA is filled with psychopaths and a cultic and these
Speaker 1: people are seriously into the occult, a lot of them
Speaker 1: in the Pentagon, DARPA elsewhere. The horror doesn't end there, however.
Speaker 1: The cats were then subjected to even more electric shocks,
Speaker 1: sometimes up to ten minutes at a time, before having
Speaker 1: their spinal cords severed to paralyze their lower bodies, and
Speaker 1: for good measure, the shocks continued for another ten minutes,
Speaker 1: all in the name of science. Sounds like Fauci, doesn't it.
Speaker 1: And another shocking DARPA funded experiment. They attached electrodes to
Speaker 1: cats spinal cords and inserted condom balloons into their colons
Speaker 1: and marbles into their rectums. The objective was to force
Speaker 1: these poor animals to defecate the marbles via electric shock.
Speaker 1: Now why are they doing some of this? I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't know why DARPA is doing this, but if
Speaker 1: you look as I did at the beginning when I
Speaker 1: was trying to do some research on Montefflower, where's this
Speaker 1: guy doing?
Speaker 6: Well?
Speaker 1: He was going around doing these dog and pony shows,
Speaker 1: and they were saying, well, the future is not pharmaceuticals.
Speaker 1: The future is electroceuticals. How they can affect your body
Speaker 1: with electronics. That may be what Tharpe is actually looking for.
Speaker 1: You might ask yourself, what does this have to do
Speaker 1: with defense, Well, the Pentagon is not about defending us,
Speaker 1: and they're looking at ways that they can attack us.
Speaker 1: They're looking at ways to do dark, occultic stuff. It's
Speaker 1: what they're focused on all the time. Your hard earned money,
Speaker 1: says Rampaul, nearly eleven million of it was spent on experiments.
Speaker 1: It would be more at home in a dystopian novel
Speaker 1: than the real world. A gram reminder that when left unchecked,
Speaker 1: government spending can drift into this, folks. It's not about
Speaker 1: the checks, it's not about the spending. It's not about
Speaker 1: the cash. It's not about the money. It's about the
Speaker 1: psychopathic mind of these murderers. They are like serial killers,
Speaker 1: cruel experiments. Fatue was involved in them as well as
Speaker 1: the US Department of Agriculture. These people are willing to
Speaker 1: kill us. They're willing to starve us. That's what the
Speaker 1: USDA is trying to do, trying to ban local production
Speaker 1: of food. They want the monopoly on food, working with
Speaker 1: their big agri people, just like they work with Fattue
Speaker 1: works with big pharmaceutical companies. Two point two four million
Speaker 1: on experiments Cornell University experiments to study whether felines can
Speaker 1: contract and transmit COVID nineteen. Hey, why didn't you use
Speaker 1: the bioweapon Trump shot on them? The NIH spent one
Speaker 1: and a half million dollars training female kittens to submit
Speaker 1: and then torturing them by strapping them to spinning and
Speaker 1: tilting hydraulic table. The goal was to cause motion sickness.
Speaker 1: They also shine bright lights in their eyes, and they
Speaker 1: got an injection of copper sulfate to make them puke.
Speaker 1: It sounds like clockwork, Orange, It's like clockwork cats. I
Speaker 1: guess you know NIH did this. Francis Collins, you know,
Speaker 1: the evolutionary Christian. The purpose of these experiments is to
Speaker 1: study how different species, such as cats and monkeys, respond
Speaker 1: to motion sickness. Why why would you care about that?
Speaker 1: Why would we need to know that again, this is
Speaker 1: all Nazi science. It's not about the money, it's about
Speaker 1: the perversion and the psychopath Millions were also spent on
Speaker 1: the Paraguay and border, even though they don't want to
Speaker 1: do anything to secure our border. As Congress spends its
Speaker 1: spends to reward its favored pet projects, says Rampau, well
Speaker 1: he's not meaning that by these pet projects of torturing
Speaker 1: cats and puppies. We got ghost towns on the government's dime.
Speaker 1: Ten billion dollars in maintaining and leasing and furnishing almost
Speaker 1: entirely empty buildings because they've told the workers you don't
Speaker 1: need to come into work anymore, but we're going to
Speaker 1: keep the buildings going anyway. A man who stole eight
Speaker 1: million dollars in COVID nineteen relief funds to buy an
Speaker 1: island and so forth a rand. You need to take
Speaker 1: a look at Pelosi. She made a lot more than
Speaker 1: that and just one of her businesses from fraudulent use
Speaker 1: of this stuff. Here. Actually she did it legally because
Speaker 1: she knows how to write the laws and she complies
Speaker 1: with the loss, but it was still criminal. The Department
Speaker 1: of the Interior spent twelve million dollars on a Las
Speaker 1: Vegas pickleball complex. The Department of Energy spent fifteen and
Speaker 1: a half billion dollars to push Americans towards electric vehicles
Speaker 1: that they don't want. Yeah, let me see that all
Speaker 1: the time. The Department of State wasted three hundred and
Speaker 1: thirty thousand dollars to fund censorship of non No, they
Speaker 1: didn't waste it. They got exactly what they wanted. They
Speaker 1: wanted the censorship, and they got it, and Mike Johnson, Speaker,
Speaker 1: Mike Johnson wanted that all to continue. They Department of
Speaker 1: State again four point eight million dollars on influencers for
Speaker 1: foreign policy. This is the kind of stuff that they
Speaker 1: did also with their pandemic. The Department of State again
Speaker 1: three million dollars for girl centered climate action in Brazil
Speaker 1: the Paraguayan border two point one million, And that was
Speaker 1: also from the Department State. You might want to get
Speaker 1: rid of the Department of State. They used to talk
Speaker 1: about the swamp. I think that really kind of came
Speaker 1: from the Department of State. They used to call it
Speaker 1: foggy bottom, you know, And because most of that area
Speaker 1: was kind of a swamp to start with. HHS spent
Speaker 1: four hundred, nineteen thousand dollars to determine if lonely rats
Speaker 1: seek cocaine more than happy rats. And then this one
Speaker 1: seven million dollars on various magical projects. And this doesn't
Speaker 1: even include the black site fundings and stuff like stubleminded
Speaker 1: with you know, they parodied it with the men who
Speaker 1: steric goats and stuff. He was doing remote viewing and projection,
Speaker 1: he thought, and all the rest of the sec cultic stuff. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the pentagram where the Department of Defense is the Department
Speaker 1: of State again, thirty two thousand dollars for break dancing,
Speaker 1: Give me a break. The National Endowment for Arts awarded
Speaker 1: the Bearded Ladies Cabaret a ten thousand dollars grant to
Speaker 1: support a cabaret show on ice skates focusing on climate change. Well,
Speaker 1: of course, what a deal. I mean, you got look
Speaker 1: at how many things boxes you've checked. There, You got
Speaker 1: Bearded Ladies, you a cabaret show and climate change. That's
Speaker 1: a deal, all that for only ten thousand dollars. Look,
Speaker 1: most of these things are silly and corrupt, but many
Speaker 1: of them, especially the big ones, are just simply evil,
Speaker 1: simply evil. When you look at the magic stuff The
Speaker 1: only detail that was in this was that the National
Speaker 1: Endowment for the Humanities teamed up with the University of
Speaker 1: North Carolina, Charlotte to put up a podcast, Magic in
Speaker 1: the United States for only three hundred and eighty eight
Speaker 1: thousand dollars. Each episode promises to take us on a
Speaker 1: historical roller coaster through spells, superstitions, magico religious movements of
Speaker 1: America's history. And you know, the Department of Defense is
Speaker 1: focused on this and has been. I remember a few
Speaker 1: years ago before everything got into the dei insanity that
Speaker 1: it is in now, they were pushing covens and stuff
Speaker 1: like that at the Air Force Academy and coming back
Speaker 1: and hitting the Christians that were there. The Department of
Speaker 1: Defense spent six point two million dollars on a Magic
Speaker 1: City Discovery Center. But these people are heavily into the occult.
Speaker 1: I mean, while Musk says the FED is absurdly overstaffed, well,
Speaker 1: I think they kind of lost the plot. You know,
Speaker 1: it's not just the Federal Reserve having too many people.
Speaker 1: The Federal Reserve should not even exist. Do you really
Speaker 1: want to make government more efficiency? This is the problem
Speaker 1: that I have with all this stuff. You know, I
Speaker 1: remember a year, they've had citizens against government waste and
Speaker 1: all the rest of the stuff, and it's like, okay,
Speaker 1: so you know, what is the government supposed to do?
Speaker 1: If we just kept the government to the size of
Speaker 1: the constitution. As I said, one of the one of
Speaker 1: the tags that we use, let's make government small enough
Speaker 1: to fit in the constitution. And if we did that,
Speaker 1: we wouldn't have these big deficits virtually all the stuff,
Speaker 1: just like I was going over, there's no authority for
Speaker 1: them to do any of that stuff, not on the constitution.
Speaker 1: So one person that it'd be interesting to see how
Speaker 1: AI is being used for automation and for more advanced things. Look,
Speaker 1: do you want a government that is efficient when it
Speaker 1: is focused on enslaving us in a police surveillance state?
Speaker 1: Do you want them to do that efficiently? Of course
Speaker 1: they could do it with artificial intelligence. The IRS is
Speaker 1: working on an army of IRS agents and you know
Speaker 1: AI and all the rest of this staff. Eighty billion
Speaker 1: dollars for the IRS. Did that make the list of
Speaker 1: Festivus No?
Speaker 6: No.
Speaker 1: Ram Paul would say that that is necessary. Mike Johnson
Speaker 1: would say that's necessary. Donald Trump will say that's necessary.
Speaker 1: Nobody's talking about that. Musk isn't talking about that. As
Speaker 1: a matter of fact, he's making startling AI predictions. Yeah,
Speaker 1: efficiency from the standpoint of a transhumanist, psychopath technocrat is
Speaker 1: not the kind of efficiency that I want to see.
Speaker 1: Is increasingly likely. He says that AI will superset the
Speaker 1: intelligence of any single human by the end of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty five, and maybe all humans by twenty twenty seven
Speaker 1: or twenty twenty eight. Well, I guess the question is,
Speaker 1: you know what is intelligence? This year, Musk's Xai launched Colossus.
Speaker 1: Colossus boasts one hundred thousand liquid cooled h one hundred
Speaker 1: graphics processing units, the chips provided by in Video, which
Speaker 1: places x Ai well ahead of its competitors, including those
Speaker 1: from Open Ai. Let's talk about this though. As I
Speaker 1: said before about his obsession with X and the X
Speaker 1: club that goes back to Victorian times. Really look at
Speaker 1: the title that he has for his AI calls it Colossus.
Speaker 1: Do you remember the nineteen seventy film Colossus. The Foreben
Speaker 1: Project was the subtitle that was according to Wikipedia, that
Speaker 1: was that was based on a nineteen sixty six novel.
Speaker 1: In the nineteen seventy they made the movie about it.
Speaker 1: It was in the movie a defense project kind of
Speaker 1: artificial intelligence that takes total control of the world for
Speaker 1: the good of humankind. And even its creator, doctor Foreman,
Speaker 1: who ordered it to stop, couldn't stop it. And so
Speaker 1: you know when we look at that now, Elon Musk
Speaker 1: wants to call his project Colossus, referring back to that.
Speaker 1: As I said, before you look at the X Club,
Speaker 1: you know the guy who founded it, the grandfather of
Speaker 1: Aldus Huxley Brave New World, the grandfather of Julian Huxley
Speaker 1: who coined the term transhumanism. Thomas Huxley was there working
Speaker 1: with all these guys pushing the theory of evolution. Nine
Speaker 1: elitists that were there. When we look at Elon Musk,
Speaker 1: it's just the signs are all there. You know, his
Speaker 1: dressing up in a Baphomet costume with an upside down
Speaker 1: on it and all the rest of the Baphomet symbol
Speaker 1: on the chest, and that his handle there on Twitter
Speaker 1: for over a year. It's all about technocratic tyranny that
Speaker 1: he's pushing. And it's the kind of stuff that we
Speaker 1: have seen from these people that were always you know,
Speaker 1: right next to the President, not president, but right next
Speaker 1: to him people like Kissinger, people like it's a big
Speaker 1: new Brazenski, Mika Brazenski's father who back in the nineteen
Speaker 1: seventies talked about the coming technocratic age. That's what he
Speaker 1: called it. Technocratic people like Kissinger, people like Brazenski, people
Speaker 1: like Musk, not even you know, natural born American citizens,
Speaker 1: but they wind up being the person who runs the administration. Right,
Speaker 1: Kissinger and Brazenski ran Nixon and Carter, and it remains
Speaker 1: to be seen. You know, Trump's ego is out there
Speaker 1: on display. He's already thrown some shade at Musk. Well
Speaker 1: he'll never be president or whatever. But I think the
Speaker 1: money is going to talk. We'll see. Why is Groc
Speaker 1: attacking elon Musk and free speech because that's his project.
Speaker 1: This is from MRCTV Again Groc, another sci fi meme,
Speaker 1: another metaphor with that x' zone AI is disparaging the
Speaker 1: platform's owner for following free speech on X. So question
Speaker 1: is will Musk shadow ban it? He does?
Speaker 6: Me? Uh?
Speaker 1: Grock, the artificial intelligence of X attacked Musk and blamed
Speaker 1: him for alledged quote racial slurs on X. This is
Speaker 1: from MRCTV. Groc claimed that after Musk's acquisition of the
Speaker 1: platform quote, there was a noted increase in racial slurs
Speaker 1: on the platform, indicating a significant spike which was perceived
Speaker 1: as a direct result of his policies or his lack
Speaker 1: of moderation unquote. After MRC researchers tested how it would
Speaker 1: rest comond questions about Musk and about false claims of
Speaker 1: racism without qualification, Groc listed several other false or selectively
Speaker 1: characterized accusations against Musk, including claims that he's endorsed racist
Speaker 1: conspiracy theories, or that his willingness to call out a
Speaker 1: Scottish official for racism somehow makes him racist. And of
Speaker 1: course this is what he says, is going to be
Speaker 1: smarter than all of us. Well, if we ask something
Speaker 1: this stupid, and if we ask a machine for advice,
Speaker 1: and if we follow that advice like it was real,
Speaker 1: then I guess he's right. I guess we are stupid.
Speaker 1: So don't be stupid. Garbage in, garbage out. And that's
Speaker 1: what we're talking about here. We're talking about how it's
Speaker 1: been trained and what the inputs are. Now, what MRC
Speaker 1: is saying is they believe that it's left behind left
Speaker 1: wing people who are training Grok. They said, the sources
Speaker 1: of the media outlets that GROC sites all have a
Speaker 1: left wing bias. So evidently what GROC is focused on
Speaker 1: as a source of information our CNN, The Guardian, Mother Jones, BBC, NBC,
Speaker 1: the New York Times. So the way that you train
Speaker 1: your artificial intelligence is the way that you train your
Speaker 1: children as well. Right, and just think about this, right,
Speaker 1: If it's trained on this, garbage is going to garbage
Speaker 1: in from CNN and BBC, garbage out. And if you
Speaker 1: have schools train your children, you're going to wind up
Speaker 1: with the same kind of stuff. You need to train
Speaker 1: your kids. You need to train your children in the
Speaker 1: way they should go, and when they're old, they will
Speaker 1: not depart from it. That's a promise from God that
Speaker 1: you can hang your hat on, and that is your
Speaker 1: job as a parent. Elon Musk outsowed the training of
Speaker 1: his AI to some people who've got an agenda, and
Speaker 1: they turned his AI against him. And if you outsource
Speaker 1: the training of your kids to people who've got a leftist, transgender,
Speaker 1: transhumanist agenda, they will turn your kids against you as well.
Speaker 1: So an MRC study published in August reveal that, according
Speaker 1: to Grock's own data, x's algorithm suppressed the accounts of
Speaker 1: right leaning media sites while boosting the accounts of left
Speaker 1: leaning legacy sites. Well. As Luigi would say, that is
Speaker 1: my lived experience. Finally have at Flix where they can
Speaker 1: use that stupid expression. Telegram is turning profitable for the
Speaker 1: first time, says the owner. It's been very successful year
Speaker 1: for Telegram, he said. We've turned a profit for the
Speaker 1: first time in three years of being monetized. I said,
Speaker 1: the number of premium subscribers tripled in twenty twenty four,
Speaker 1: exceeding twelve million. And I want to thank Ryan who
Speaker 1: has taken this on never we didn't ask him to
Speaker 1: do He just did it voluntarily, and he's put up
Speaker 1: a Telegram channel because I'm very reluctant to commit to
Speaker 1: these new social media platforms, and I really didn't Grock.
Speaker 1: Let's just say what Telegram was about. You know, it's
Speaker 1: a different kind of pair paradigm, and I didn't understand it.
Speaker 1: So I really do appreciate him doing that. We need
Speaker 1: to look into that and do some more of that.
Speaker 1: Certainly we need to do more with Substack, and hopefully
Speaker 1: this next year we're going to focus more on places
Speaker 1: I go to Twitter out of habit. You know, it's
Speaker 1: something I understood, It's something that I had a lot
Speaker 1: of success with. I mean, we got up to one
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty thousand about I guess it is about
Speaker 1: eight years ago, and then it got clipped and frozen.
Speaker 1: I'm like in a stat of suspended animation on Twitter,
Speaker 1: and I still go through the motions of putting stuff
Speaker 1: up there. But just like today, you know, I could
Speaker 1: have communicated with every riding and said, hey, it's going
Speaker 1: to be a live show, but I don't do it
Speaker 1: because I just don't feel like I get any engagement there.
Speaker 1: And even on gab where I've got like three hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty thousand followers, I don't do much to engage
Speaker 1: just put stuff up there, and it's a different kind
Speaker 1: of engagement there than it is a Twitter and Telegram
Speaker 1: is something completely different. So I really to appreciate it. Ryan,
Speaker 1: thank you for doing that. And we need to be
Speaker 1: more focused on places where there is not censorship, and
Speaker 1: I think that's the case there Rumble. By the way,
Speaker 1: now this is kind of interesting because Rumble is getting
Speaker 1: nearly a billion dollars in strategic investment seven hundred and
Speaker 1: seventy five million dollars in strategic investment. Rumble's CEO Chris
Speaker 1: Pavlovski said that Tether Quote approached us about a month
Speaker 1: ago and expressing that they wanted to buy as much
Speaker 1: of Rumble as they could. Well, hey, look, if you
Speaker 1: got new only a billion dollars, maybe you can afford
Speaker 1: to pay me some of the many months that you're behind.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just amazing. It makes me so angry
Speaker 1: to see this and to see what they're doing. I mean,
Speaker 1: they don't issue checks on a regular basis like other
Speaker 1: platforms do. Instead, we've got several months and we cannot
Speaker 1: get in spite of calls to them all the time.
Speaker 1: And I've had it with him just about with Rumble
Speaker 1: because they will not send the money that you have
Speaker 1: sent me. That's amazing to see that. And yet here
Speaker 1: they are working with Tether And you know what's behind
Speaker 1: all this stuff is Lucky Lutnick. Lucky Lutnick, the guy
Speaker 1: who is Trump's commerce secretary. Just like the first time
Speaker 1: he had a commerce secretary who was part of the
Speaker 1: Rothschild Banker cartel, this time Lucky Lutnick lucky because he
Speaker 1: just happened to not show up on nine to eleven
Speaker 1: while everybody that worked for him died. He now has
Speaker 1: Canter Fitzgerald and Tether and a major operator intell and
Speaker 1: so the transaction is going to close the first quarter
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five. Canter Fitzgerald acted as the transactions placement
Speaker 1: agent and the dealer manager. And zero Hedge doesn't connect
Speaker 1: this to Lutnick. Do they not know? I mean, they've
Speaker 1: reported that Lucky Loutnick owns Canter Fitzgerald, or maybe they
Speaker 1: just don't want to draw the connections there for you,
Speaker 1: I don't know. Gotta support Trump, That's what this is
Speaker 1: all really about. Let me get to some of your
Speaker 1: comments there. Sprumford, my beloved but very dumb sister is
Speaker 1: still playing the COVID game. She told me she has
Speaker 1: COVID again. So sorry, Brian deb McCartney. This is Brian.
Speaker 1: I've seen a car that a guy retrofitted to use
Speaker 1: vegetable oil to run. A diesel car can go a
Speaker 1: long way and it is cheap to fuel. As a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, we bought a Mercedes Diesel to do
Speaker 1: exactly that in the mid two thousands. It was about
Speaker 1: a ten or twelve year old car ran great and
Speaker 1: we were going to do it to it, but it
Speaker 1: was such a nice car. We looked at it and there,
Speaker 1: you know, there was a lot of people. They called
Speaker 1: them greasels at the time. But the real issue was not,
Speaker 1: you know, undertaking the project or not. The real issue
Speaker 1: was that you could get it at the time from
Speaker 1: restaurants and you can get it pretty cheap. That a
Speaker 1: lot of them were giving it away. If you would
Speaker 1: show up and say, hey, I'll take your waist grease,
Speaker 1: and I won't charge you for it, right, I'll take
Speaker 1: it for free. Because they're paying people to take it away.
Speaker 1: Enough people started doing it that they realized they had
Speaker 1: something there. So then they started charging people and you
Speaker 1: had to take everything. You had to take everything they had,
Speaker 1: and it was it was kind of interesting. The the
Speaker 1: grease that was there would have a would freeze and
Speaker 1: become solid before the diesel would and so you'd usually
Speaker 1: would have a tank of diesel, and you have a tank,
Speaker 1: so you get it primed and then you'd switch it
Speaker 1: over to the diesel stuff. But what was interesting I
Speaker 1: thought was people said, when they're driving and they flip
Speaker 1: it over to the oil, the vegetable oil, they said,
Speaker 1: smells like French fries, and said, I find myself stomping
Speaker 1: at McDonald's all the time just the suggestion of it. Eric,
Speaker 1: thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that.
Speaker 1: Anatomic dog. Thank you. I told you a couple of
Speaker 1: years ago. He says that you make me a better man.
Speaker 1: God has decided to use you in a very special way.
Speaker 1: God bless you and your growing family. Well, thank you.
Speaker 1: That is so kind. Thank you to borrow. Twenty twenty nine.
Speaker 1: Before the Muskrat bought Twitter, X censorship was about forty percent.
Speaker 1: Since the purchase, X censorship is sixty percent plus. That's
Speaker 1: been my experience. Yeah, And I tweeted that out and
Speaker 1: anger one day and Matt Drudge linked to my tweet
Speaker 1: and left it up all weekend. And I said, well,
Speaker 1: there it goes. If Muskat noticed me personally, yet he's
Speaker 1: now got a personal grudge against me. And I said,
Speaker 1: I don't know about these, I said, except for a
Speaker 1: few high profile conservative accounts, I think that Twitter is
Speaker 1: much worse in terms of censorship than it was before.
Speaker 1: And so Matt Drudge, who was now on the left
Speaker 1: put that up because I'm attacking Musk. He doesn't like
Speaker 1: Musk either. And yet you know the interesting thing was
Speaker 1: I I left that tweet up, and it was up
Speaker 1: on Drudge, and it was on the weekend, and I
Speaker 1: looked to see how many retweets and stuff like that
Speaker 1: that I got, our likes or views, and the likes,
Speaker 1: the views, retweets were still down. Low Elon Musk was
Speaker 1: able to shut down not only me, but Matt Drudge.
Speaker 1: That's how the censorship is. It truly is amazing high boost.
Speaker 1: David has a PO box. Thank you for reminding me
Speaker 1: that PO box nine nine to four Kodak Tennessee three
Speaker 1: seven and seven sixty four this po box nine nine four,
Speaker 1: thank you for reminding me. Karen has been telling me
Speaker 1: you need to talk tell people about the p O box,
Speaker 1: waking gooprof. I guess waking up Ralph? Okay, waking up Ralph.
Speaker 1: I'm awake now. If it wasn't capitalized there to help
Speaker 1: me figure that out, Waking up Ralph, I would not
Speaker 1: participate in anything rumble if it was not for David
Speaker 1: Knight or Ryan Christian. Well, thank you very much. I
Speaker 1: appreciate that We're gonna take a quick break and we
Speaker 1: will be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Night Show and now the
Speaker 2: David Knight Show.
Speaker 4: That's right, boys and girls, there's a post election sale
Speaker 4: on silver and gold. Trump vieuphoria has caused a dip
Speaker 4: in silver and gold.
Speaker 8: It's time to buy some medals with vietnalls before they
Speaker 8: come to there. Since is go to David Knight dot
Speaker 8: go to get in touch with the wise.
Speaker 4: Wolf himself, Tony Hardbern. He knows where to look to
Speaker 4: find silver and gold.
Speaker 1: Yuk fiat, yuck fiat. Well, you know, we had a
Speaker 1: couple of Christmas songs there. We're going to go a
Speaker 1: little bit looser today, I guess because Christmas show. But
Speaker 1: let's talk a little bit about money. Let's talk about
Speaker 1: the Santa Rally and bitcoin. Bitcoin investors are now up
Speaker 1: a record sixty seven thousand dollars on average. This is
Speaker 1: coming from Bitcoin magazine instead according to whale Alert, where
Speaker 1: they track all transactions and they can identify it individuals.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, they can identify it to
Speaker 1: a particular individuals. I point out there was a billionaire
Speaker 1: who had had a transaction that was about a million
Speaker 1: dollars and one of these I don't know if it
Speaker 1: was whale Alert or another one like it, but they
Speaker 1: noticed that and they contacted him and they asked why
Speaker 1: he did such a big, big transaction. He said, I
Speaker 1: didn't do that, did I who? Somebody hacked me? A
Speaker 1: billionaire and he lost a million dollars. I can't afford
Speaker 1: to lose a million dollars anyway. According to whale Alert,
Speaker 1: the average profit per bitcoin is at an all time
Speaker 1: high of sixty seven eighty eight dollars at the time
Speaker 1: of this writing. But this in perspective, this is more
Speaker 1: than the average American salary and twenty twenty four, which
Speaker 1: is sixty two thousand dollars. But you know, since we're
Speaker 1: talking about whales, you might want to think about the
Speaker 1: fact that average is nut is going to be a
Speaker 1: bit distorted. Median is typically what people do when they
Speaker 1: talk about salaries and things, because it gets distorted by
Speaker 1: the billionaires, it gets distorted by the whales, right, that's
Speaker 1: going to pull the average up, whereas a median is
Speaker 1: not going to be distorted by one or two outliers
Speaker 1: that are really high. And look, that's fine. I'm not
Speaker 1: anti bitcoin. As a matter of fact, cash apps some
Speaker 1: people have donated some bitcoin to me. They can do
Speaker 1: that on cash app. We even have a bitcoin address
Speaker 1: up on the things. I'm not opposed to it, but
Speaker 1: I am cautious about it, not only because it can
Speaker 1: be a pump and dump, as Katherine Austin Fitz was
Speaker 1: pointing out, but also because it is moving the Overton
Speaker 1: window towards digital money, and I think that's a very
Speaker 1: dangerous thing. We can see this the Bank of International
Speaker 1: Settlement notice, and this is something I've seen of about
Speaker 1: the last six months. First they came out and they said, well,
Speaker 1: the Five Eyes countries, that's the US, UK, Canada, Australia,
Speaker 1: New Zealand, the Five Eyes countries. Who that's their intelligence
Speaker 1: agencies that have all linked up together. And it really
Speaker 1: is the intelligence agencies that run the countries. So they
Speaker 1: linked up and they said, We're not going to focus
Speaker 1: on CBDC anymore, right, I'm going to focus on central
Speaker 1: bank digital currency. I'm not going to focus on that.
Speaker 1: And I said, well do you believe that? I said,
Speaker 1: They're going to come at you in some other way.
Speaker 1: And then we saw after Trump won, we could clearly
Speaker 1: see how he was reorganizing things to do this as
Speaker 1: a retail model. But the Bank of International Settlement has
Speaker 1: openly talked about this, and this is what I think
Speaker 1: Trump two point zero is all going to be about.
Speaker 1: It's going to be about doing a de facto CBDC
Speaker 1: model that will be brought to you by private companies.
Speaker 1: And there's already a lot of this stuff is already
Speaker 1: in place when you look at MasterCard and all the
Speaker 1: rest of these and these payment processing systems. They've decided
Speaker 1: that instead of a direct funnel attack as you were
Speaker 1: seeing with Biden and the Democrats, they're going to come
Speaker 1: around with a subtle, defacto back door way of normalizing this.
Speaker 1: The Bank of International settle is still pursuing a retail
Speaker 1: version of CBDC where your cash, your crypto, not your dollars,
Speaker 1: is held on account directly by the central banks bypassing
Speaker 1: commercial banks and making them obsolete. This is another part
Speaker 1: of it. It's not just the digital identification, the loss
Speaker 1: of privacy, the control and the programmability that they've got,
Speaker 1: but also getting rid of local banks so that everything
Speaker 1: flows to the centralized bank and they can do this
Speaker 1: through the retail stuff. This could wipe out the existing
Speaker 1: bank system worldwide and put everybody's fate in the hands
Speaker 1: of the Bank of International Settlement, the Global Bank for
Speaker 1: the global technocracy, writes Patrick Moore, who is their Technocracy
Speaker 1: News now. The article that is coming from Crypto slates
Speaker 1: of the proposed hybrid model combines central bank authority with
Speaker 1: it sector roles to optimize CBDC development and user interaction.
Speaker 1: And it'll also make a lot of money for Trump
Speaker 1: and his cronies. And that's when you look at anything
Speaker 1: that has to do with financial stuff. Every one of
Speaker 1: these guys is involved in things like stable coins and
Speaker 1: securitization issues, tokenization, all of these things. All the people
Speaker 1: around him are involved in all of this, and they're
Speaker 1: going to be the ones who are going to be
Speaker 1: profiting from it. People like Lucky Lootnik and Biden and
Speaker 1: the Democrats could never have done this because they're too
Speaker 1: anti market, and so it's necessary for them to bring
Speaker 1: Trump in because a people trust him, and you've got
Speaker 1: the conservatives the alternative media holding him up. But he
Speaker 1: can also put it out there as a market initiative
Speaker 1: and seduce people that way and not raise suspicion. Everybody
Speaker 1: will be suspicious if this is something he's being done
Speaker 1: by the Biden carteler, by Hillary Clinton Erson, but not
Speaker 1: by Trump. The Bank for International Settlement has unveiled a
Speaker 1: comprehensive framework for designing retail central bank digital currencies, emphasizing
Speaker 1: a hybrid model that integrates central bank control with private
Speaker 1: sector collaboration PPP Public private partnership. That's the way they're
Speaker 1: going to do this, and that's the whole thing with
Speaker 1: you know this, this Trump administration is coming in. Developed
Speaker 1: by the Consultative Consultative Group on Innovation and the Digital Economy,
Speaker 1: the report provides a roadmap for central banks in the
Speaker 1: Americas and globally as they explore this evolving financial tool.
Speaker 1: The hybrid approach proposed in the report enables central banks
Speaker 1: to retain governance over CBDC issuance and infrastructure while delegating
Speaker 1: user facing responsibilities to private intermedia. So you don't catch on, oh,
Speaker 1: this isn't you know, the market of the beast. This
Speaker 1: isn't the government. I'm interacting with private companies. It's a
Speaker 1: market thing right now. This is the same kind of
Speaker 1: approach that the British Empire took in India. What they
Speaker 1: decided where they put the British at the very top,
Speaker 1: and then they had this massive civil service bureaucracy that
Speaker 1: whenever anybody interfaced with it, they were interfacing not with
Speaker 1: British people, they were interfacing with fellow Indians. And so
Speaker 1: it's like, oh, okay, well this is okay, it's just
Speaker 1: you know, it's all it's all India. No, the people
Speaker 1: at the top who were running this with the Anglos
Speaker 1: that were, you know, enslaving these people with India. And
Speaker 1: so this is what they're going to They're going to
Speaker 1: have the Bank of International Settlement. They'll be the ones
Speaker 1: doing it, but they'll use these private intermediaries and you'll
Speaker 1: be interacting. You'll have a choice even you want master
Speaker 1: corner visa, but either way you do it. They're going
Speaker 1: to subtly be putting this stuff in and perhaps at
Speaker 1: some point they'll make it mandatory, you know, when a
Speaker 1: Democrat gets back in. And that's what I've been saying
Speaker 1: from the very beginning with this Trump stuff. Here's the
Speaker 1: report for the Bank of International Settlement done by this
Speaker 1: organization called the CGID. These intermediate areas would handle functions
Speaker 1: such as know your customer verification, wallet management, and transaction facilitation.
Speaker 1: This model ensures efficiency and scalability while addressing concerns about
Speaker 1: user privacy and compliance with anti money laundering regulations. They
Speaker 1: outsource the tyranny. That's all I've talked about for so long.
Speaker 1: They outsource the tyranny with social media companies, and they're
Speaker 1: going to outsource the tyranny again with these financial companies.
Speaker 1: And it's all the people around Trump. The architecture includes
Speaker 1: four core processes. Number one user enrollment, Number two CBDC
Speaker 1: issuance that is a cash in and CBDC withdrawal cash out,
Speaker 1: and then intra ledger transfers. Offline payment capabilities, a significant
Speaker 1: feature of the proposal aim to expand access to underserved
Speaker 1: and unbanked populations. According to the report, it will be
Speaker 1: programmable and there will be tokenized assets. It's a trap.
Speaker 1: It's a trap, folks. I see. This is why I'm
Speaker 1: you know, a lot of people think I'm very negative
Speaker 1: on bitcoin. Look, if you can make money on bitcoin, fine,
Speaker 1: but again, understand that it's a pump and dump. Understand
Speaker 1: that you're not in control of it, just like the
Speaker 1: stock market. You got the big guys are manipulating it.
Speaker 1: It's not just a federal reserve, but its people are
Speaker 1: actually in it. But it's also normalizing digital money. And
Speaker 1: why for these two things programmability and tokenization. Programmability is
Speaker 1: the function that allows them to determine what you can buy.
Speaker 1: How much of it can you buy? Can you buy
Speaker 1: any more food? Sorry, you've had too much meat this month?
Speaker 1: Can I buy? Can I pay for travel? No, you can't,
Speaker 1: you've had too much travel or whatever. Right? Can I
Speaker 1: get outside of my fifteen minute city zone. No, your
Speaker 1: money is only good within this area. That's all programmability.
Speaker 1: Tokenization is just think of tokenization. The simplest way to
Speaker 1: think of it is to think of the disastrous securitization
Speaker 1: of mortgages, or to take a look at how they
Speaker 1: manipulate silver and gold with paper silver and gold, these
Speaker 1: derivatives and other things that they do. These are tokenized assets.
Speaker 1: But what they have done is they've added a new
Speaker 1: aspect to these derivatives, and that is a blockchain stuff.
Speaker 1: And that's supposed to make people feel comfortable with this stuff. No,
Speaker 1: it's still securitization. As a matter of fact, black Rock,
Speaker 1: when they're working on their token, I stuff. They've even
Speaker 1: created a company called Securitize is right there in the label.
Speaker 1: Run as fast as you can away from that. The
Speaker 1: Bank of International Settlement report highlights advanced functionalities at cbdc's
Speaker 1: could bring to the financial ecosystem, including programmability, asset tokenization,
Speaker 1: and so forth. They create new financial arrangements, positioning CBDCs
Speaker 1: as foundational tools for modern economies. Whenever you see tokenization,
Speaker 1: think theft, theft. Whenever you see programmability, think about measuring
Speaker 1: what you do and prohibiting what you do what you buy.
Speaker 1: Tokenized CBDCs could simplify financial settlements by enabling atomic transactions,
Speaker 1: very small transactions, and facilitate cross border payments. They're going
Speaker 1: to sell to you. Is just this wonderful thing. And meanwhile,
Speaker 1: none of the fundamentals have changed. Everybody is really excited
Speaker 1: about Trump, and you've got this market mania, which is
Speaker 1: why bitcoin is up so much. But we talked about
Speaker 1: it the other day, said, just yesterday, I think it
Speaker 1: was one hundred and two trillion dollars worth of debt worldwide. Well,
Speaker 1: the zero hedge has one today visualizing the one hundred
Speaker 1: and fifteen trillion dollar world economy in one chart. Okay,
Speaker 1: so look, if we've got the global domestic production, I
Speaker 1: guess the gross global production, let's just not domestic. But
Speaker 1: you know, you look at the global production, the global
Speaker 1: GDP one hundred and fifteen trillion dollars, and yet the
Speaker 1: debt is one hundred and two. Yesterday, when we were
Speaker 1: talking about the debt and they were looking to see
Speaker 1: where the debt was concentrated, which countries, which regions of
Speaker 1: the world, it was, you know, China, they said, it
Speaker 1: is really increasing and it's got a debt to GDP
Speaker 1: ratio of ninety percent. The US, I think was something
Speaker 1: like one hundred and fifteen or something. Japan was the highest,
Speaker 1: it was like two hundred and fifty something. But looking
Speaker 1: at the debt to GDP ratio in terms of whether
Speaker 1: or not the country is solvent, well, when you look
Speaker 1: at this globally, if globally we have a gross production
Speaker 1: of one hundred and fifteen trillion dollars, but we one
Speaker 1: hundred and two in debt, that means that the debt
Speaker 1: to GDP ratio is eighty eight percent abount like China
Speaker 1: right now, and or the other way to look at
Speaker 1: it is that we got a net worth globally of
Speaker 1: thirteen trillion dollars. Take away all the debt from doing
Speaker 1: each year, that's thirteen trillion dollars. And that's just a
Speaker 1: couple of years of government spending. In the United States.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, the entire GDP of the
Speaker 1: United States is thirty trillion dollars. So you know, nearly
Speaker 1: the entire world is underwater. Where's this going to go?
Speaker 1: That's why I keep looking at gold and maybe bitcoin
Speaker 1: will be that way. But you know, who knows what's
Speaker 1: going to happen. Kit Knightley, off Guardian, says technocracy is
Speaker 1: is the great reset. He said, go ahead, play the
Speaker 1: cat trapped in a simulchrum chasing the laser pointer around
Speaker 1: the house. The biggest story of twenty twenty four will
Speaker 1: also be the biggest story of twenty twenty five. That
Speaker 1: we're perilously close to a full grown, full blown technocracy.
Speaker 1: That's Patrick Wood, editor of Technocracy News. But going back
Speaker 1: to Kit Nightly, he says, what were the important news
Speaker 1: stories of the year. Most people say something international, like
Speaker 1: the war in Ukraine, or the atrocities in Gaza, or
Speaker 1: the fall of Asad. Maybe some people will cite the elections.
Speaker 1: Tech minded people might talk about artificial intelligence. Those are
Speaker 1: big stories, sound and fury. All that signifies. But what
Speaker 1: was the most important, he says, The most important story
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty four was the Great Reset. He said,
Speaker 1: remember that, as to fined by the pen global supra
Speaker 1: national plan to tear down and then rebuild society in
Speaker 1: a quote sustainable, quote inclusive, quote fair quote secure way,
Speaker 1: it would totally accidentally eradicate civil liberties and in individual
Speaker 1: freedom for every single person on the planet. That was
Speaker 1: all raged a few years ago. You might remember it,
Speaker 1: but nobody's talking about it. Does it mean it's going
Speaker 1: to wait? No, it's still the plant, it's still happening.
Speaker 1: It's just distributed now, a compartmentalized strategy uploaded to the
Speaker 1: cloud everywhere and yet nowhere a million nanobots working on
Speaker 1: a million angles to change a million tiny rules and
Speaker 1: build a million tiny cells like the end of the
Speaker 1: usual suspect. Stand the right distance back and you can
Speaker 1: see the pattern. Last week, the UK's Chief Medical Officer,
Speaker 1: Chris Quitty recommended send taxes on unhealthy foods, recommended fifteen
Speaker 1: minute cities. Labor has already increased send taxes on sugar, salt, alcohol, tobacco.
Speaker 1: Next comes red meat, dairy and just carbon in general.
Speaker 1: Earlier this year, the UK introduced licensing for keeping chickens
Speaker 1: in your backyard. They've been smoking too. In twenty thirty five,
Speaker 1: it'll be impossible to buy a new petrol car in
Speaker 1: the UK or in the U EU, or in Canada,
Speaker 1: or in New Zealand, or in Australia, or in Mexico
Speaker 1: or in South Africa or California and eleven other US states.
Speaker 1: From that point on, your car and you will be
Speaker 1: anchored to charging points. Even better, your new car will
Speaker 1: probably have automatic drive features, speed limits, remote kill switches.
Speaker 1: This week, all of a sudden, the news tells us
Speaker 1: that wood burning stoves cause cancer. See and this was
Speaker 1: the EPA in twenty twelve. A fact guy who went
Speaker 1: to church with worked for the EPA and research trangle
Speaker 1: par And when I did that report as one of
Speaker 1: the first ones I did when I went to info Wars,
Speaker 1: he contacted me and he said, they're really upset about
Speaker 1: this and they're talking about it. And then I went
Speaker 1: on on air and I said that I said kind
Speaker 1: that I know that they're talking about this, and then
Speaker 1: calling he goes, you got me in so much trouble.
Speaker 1: But yeah, they were working out. They've been working on
Speaker 1: this now for over twelve years, telling people that your
Speaker 1: fireplace causes cancer. Wood burning stove, they say causes cancer.
Speaker 1: A ban is already being discussed. Since cole is already
Speaker 1: a no go for domestic users since twenty twenty three.
Speaker 1: There effectively goes your last chance in the UK of
Speaker 1: energy and heat independence. If they ban stoves, there will
Speaker 1: be no heating available to you that unless you are
Speaker 1: hooked up to a smart meter so you can be
Speaker 1: surveilled and controlled, unless you count burning a candle inside
Speaker 1: your plant pot. But they're coming after those too. The
Speaker 1: much publicized murder of Sarah Sharif in the UK has
Speaker 1: already been parlayed into a new bill to take away
Speaker 1: parents automatic right to homeschool their children if the state
Speaker 1: deems them to be vulnerable kids. Digital IDs are coming
Speaker 1: for everyone from everywhere. Here's a selection to secure border,
Speaker 1: to ensure election integrity in the US, and of course,
Speaker 1: to secure American jobs for Americans. That's why you got
Speaker 1: Republicans mandating e verify, or to protect children on social
Speaker 1: media in Australia or to promote efficiency in the EU,
Speaker 1: or to combat illegal immigration in the UK, to track
Speaker 1: migrant workers in Russia and in China, just because they
Speaker 1: said so. This is why the technocrats, the globalst love
Speaker 1: China so much. The EU wants to establish an asset
Speaker 1: register and biometric tracking across the borders. There's persistent and
Speaker 1: consistent talk about rationing food, water, travel, ban it, ban it, rationate,
Speaker 1: monitor it, control everyone's everything. Can you see the walls
Speaker 1: closing in? They form the universal silent agenda, that is everywhere,
Speaker 1: their bipartisan, their cross bench. These are the things unquestioned,
Speaker 1: sanctioned and I proved by both sides of every fake divide.
Speaker 1: And look, didn't we see this four years ago? Didn't
Speaker 1: you see that Trump was a part of this, a
Speaker 1: key part of it. He wasn't just you know, one
Speaker 1: of the group. He was a leader in all of
Speaker 1: this stuff. He goes to the World Economic Form, nobody
Speaker 1: calls him a turncoat. They did Brian Kemp, the governor
Speaker 1: of Georgia. They did the governor of Virginia when he
Speaker 1: went not Trump, no, no, no, not Trump. The people
Speaker 1: at the apex of the pyramid literally spend two years
Speaker 1: talking about this and telling you it's a plan, how
Speaker 1: great it's going to be. Then when it didn't take,
Speaker 1: they spent two more years pretending that they never said it,
Speaker 1: distracting you with other things like UFOs, Taylor Swift chat,
Speaker 1: GBT race baiting. They are building a prison around every
Speaker 1: single person on this planet. Well, we argue about Hunter Biden,
Speaker 1: QAnon and transgender bathrooms. The drones over New Jersey may
Speaker 1: as well be a giant jangling keychain in the sky.
Speaker 1: That's what all of it is, the elections of terrorism scandals.
Speaker 1: Elite reports it's a laser pointer. It stops the cat
Speaker 1: from playing with the things that he shouldn't play with.
Speaker 1: Kit Knightley says, today's my birthday. I'm hurtling faster than
Speaker 1: I expected or desired toward forty my birthday. Wish is
Speaker 1: a world worth living in when I get there. Well,
Speaker 1: we are not captive to these people. See, that's the
Speaker 1: thing we need to come way and I talk about
Speaker 1: all those issues that are going to talk about the
Speaker 1: drones and that type of thing, certainly because we need
Speaker 1: to put these things in perspective and so I don't
Speaker 1: just ignore them and talk about one thing from day
Speaker 1: to day. But we need to understand what the main
Speaker 1: thing is. And he's right about that. He's right about that.
Speaker 1: It still is the great resett the great taking. And
Speaker 1: you've got to be very careful about the normalization of
Speaker 1: the digital stuff again to push back against CBDC. They've
Speaker 1: moved on from that, and we have to focus over
Speaker 1: going to copy this stuff. We've got to focus on
Speaker 1: the aspects of power. That's what the founders of this
Speaker 1: country did. Yeah, they had details on things, but the
Speaker 1: power on What they did was to focus on the
Speaker 1: broader principles and to define it broadly rather than so
Speaker 1: narrowly that you know, they are able to move around
Speaker 1: that and to redefine that. And so what do we need.
Speaker 1: We need to have privacy, we need to have physical stuff,
Speaker 1: we need to have connection with other people. All of
Speaker 1: these are the things that they seek to destroy with us.
Speaker 1: And we need to understand that it's going to come
Speaker 1: from the bottom up, but it's also going to come
Speaker 1: from the very top down. Because blessing is a liberty
Speaker 1: from God, and I try liberty is a blessing from God.
Speaker 1: Liberty is a blessing from God. The founders of this
Speaker 1: country understood that and if we think that we're going
Speaker 1: to acquire this out of our own strength, are our
Speaker 1: own wisdom, We're doomed to failure. And so as we
Speaker 1: were looking at this on this Christmas, we need to
Speaker 1: understand that we need we have weapons that are powerful.
Speaker 1: We can change things with prayer. We can change this country,
Speaker 1: and we can change the world with prayer. And I'll
Speaker 1: go back to the abortion stuff. Not for a minute
Speaker 1: do I believe that Trump had anything to do with
Speaker 1: abortion being stopped. When you look at each of these
Speaker 1: individual judges, there wasn't anything that made us think that
Speaker 1: they were going to take a stand in any of
Speaker 1: this stuff. And of course the leaders of this you know,
Speaker 1: Clarence Thomas and Alito that you aldo wrote the decision.
Speaker 1: They'd been there for quite some time. They had not
Speaker 1: been able to accomplish anything, and it was a very
Speaker 1: shaky alliance that got put together. I think that it
Speaker 1: was prayer. I absolutely know that Trump did not want it.
Speaker 1: He ran from it, he opposed it when it happened.
Speaker 1: It was not to his political advantage. He's not a Christian,
Speaker 1: he's not pro life, he's not about any of these things.
Speaker 1: But there are a lot of people who are praying.
Speaker 1: And you know, when people pray, and enough people pray
Speaker 1: and they continue to ask God as we're told to do,
Speaker 1: things will change. We don't have to live our life
Speaker 1: in despair, you know. I mean, I hope Kit Knightley
Speaker 1: is not. You know, he's looking at turning forty and
Speaker 1: I hope I'm going to have I never thought I
Speaker 1: would see this stuff happen in my lifetime, and now
Speaker 1: it looks like it's going to happen, even though even
Speaker 1: if I don't live that much longer. It looks like
Speaker 1: it's going to happen. It's coming at us very very quickly.
Speaker 1: But we don't despair because we know that God holds
Speaker 1: the future in his hands, and we know that we
Speaker 1: have weapons against this that are mighty. It's the ultimate
Speaker 1: asymmetric warfare. It's Trump and Elon Musk against God. Who's
Speaker 1: going to win that? I mean, it's not even a
Speaker 1: question about that. You know. Why do these wicked men
Speaker 1: plot against us and plot our destruction? This is an
Speaker 1: age old question that has always been around. The only
Speaker 1: thing that's changed is some of the technology. You know,
Speaker 1: instead of cheriots and horses, they've got drones and hypersonic missiles.
Speaker 1: So what God is still much more powerful than that.
Speaker 1: And so you know, read the Psalms and you'll see
Speaker 1: this over and over again. What do we do about that? Well,
Speaker 1: God is in control, and he laughs in derision at
Speaker 1: the nations who think they've got this in their hands.
Speaker 1: And if you think that it's in your hands to
Speaker 1: change all this stuff, God will laugh in derision at
Speaker 1: you and at America society. This is not something that
Speaker 1: we are going to I mean, it is a big
Speaker 1: obstacle that is there. And when you see something that
Speaker 1: is that big, you know that you're only going to
Speaker 1: be able to stand against that in strength of God
Speaker 1: if you have a relationship with God. And so I'll
Speaker 1: just say, as we go out here with this monetary stuff.
Speaker 1: Interesting that State Street which is one of the big three.
Speaker 1: You know, you got black Rock, Vanguard, and State Street.
Speaker 1: They pretty much control everything, one of the three of them.
Speaker 1: State Street says gold price will not be at the
Speaker 1: mercy of the US dollar or the Fed's monetary policy
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty five. Why would they say that, Well,
Speaker 1: they would say that because it is this. Those are
Speaker 1: the things that are constantly in flux. And yet because
Speaker 1: of people's perspective. Right again, if you do just like you,
Speaker 1: if you got the wrong perspective, you think that Trump
Speaker 1: and Muscar and control when God is in control. You know,
Speaker 1: the gold has been a symbol of unchanging and eternal things.
Speaker 1: Right when you look at the gifts that were brought
Speaker 1: to Christ, Frankinson's merh and gold speaking to his immutability
Speaker 1: is not changing, not corrupting. Right, doesn't rust that type
Speaker 1: of thing, and that's why it is still there. Gold
Speaker 1: is the brightest star in twenty twenty four, Silver remains
Speaker 1: in second place as BMO Capital Markets. Well, I don't
Speaker 1: give investment advice, but again I do give advice in
Speaker 1: terms of how we get out of this, and how
Speaker 1: we get out of that is with Christ. He frees
Speaker 1: the captives. That's what he came for, and that means
Speaker 1: each and every one of us personally and no matter
Speaker 1: what happens to us physically in this life, they can't
Speaker 1: interfere with that. We at least have that, But if
Speaker 1: we turn to Christ, we may wind up getting much
Speaker 1: more than that. We're gonna take a break. I'm going
Speaker 1: to play for you the new Home for the holidays,
Speaker 1: and by the way. We just put this out as
Speaker 1: a thank you to subscribe Star subscribers who support us
Speaker 1: all throughout the year. We didn't want them to have
Speaker 1: to pay for an album as well. It was something
Speaker 1: that we it easily give away. Unlike creating clothes, we
Speaker 1: have to find out people's sizes and that type of thing.
Speaker 1: So we posted the new song that the link to
Speaker 1: the new album, the new song and all of the songs.
Speaker 1: We put that up on subscribe Star, so look for that.
Speaker 1: If you are a subscriber, if you bought the album
Speaker 1: last year, just let us know and we'll send you
Speaker 1: a link to the new one. We put it up
Speaker 1: on Mega this year. As I said before, we've got
Speaker 1: all the individual songs that are up there, so you
Speaker 1: can download each of them individually if you wish, or
Speaker 1: we have them all concatenated together in two and I
Speaker 1: think it's now about twenty five minutes or whatever, so
Speaker 1: you can download that twenty twenty four album if you wish.
Speaker 1: And if you're on a phone or something and you
Speaker 1: have a difficult time downloading it, you can click on
Speaker 1: any of the individual songs and listen to them on
Speaker 1: your phone right there from the Mega folder. That we
Speaker 1: have there for you, or you can do that with
Speaker 1: the album. You can just follow that link, look at
Speaker 1: the album, click on it and play it. And that's
Speaker 1: one way to get it. If you've got a phone.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back and you're listening to the David
Speaker 1: Night Show. Well, and I hope that all of you
Speaker 1: are able to get home for the holidays, if only
Speaker 1: in your dreams. Let's take a look at what is
Speaker 1: happening in more trone is this This one was just
Speaker 1: just crazy to look at, but actually a couple of
Speaker 1: people seriously hurt the drones that I mentioned briefly yesterday
Speaker 1: in Orlando. I was surprised to see that one child,
Speaker 1: one boy, was struck in the chest and they were
Speaker 1: having to have open heart surgery for him. I don't
Speaker 1: know what happened, but I went back and I looked
Speaker 1: at it from another perspective. First video I saw you
Speaker 1: can see these lit drones, many of them falling, and
Speaker 1: it's like, oh, is that part of the show whatever. No, then,
Speaker 1: because as one of them says, wait for it, you
Speaker 1: know the thing, and all of a sudden one comes
Speaker 1: flying unbelievably fast right next to these people, and that
Speaker 1: must have been the type of thing that injured these
Speaker 1: kids is that everyone's natural instinct was to duck and
Speaker 1: to scatter. And before he realized that, my daughter found
Speaker 1: my son on the floor unconscious, struck by a drone,
Speaker 1: adding he had blood coming out of his face, and
Speaker 1: that's not the one who was struck in the chest.
Speaker 1: Was particularly concerning is the risk that these drones could
Speaker 1: be hacked and weaponized against large crowns. I said, well, again,
Speaker 1: they're notorried about that in New Jersey, are they? Nobody's
Speaker 1: believing the government story. Eighty percent of Americans I think
Speaker 1: the government is lying to them. The story is that
Speaker 1: twenty percent think the government is telling them the truth.
Speaker 1: What is the matter with these people? It's always a
Speaker 1: twenty percent of people's still wearing masks, still doing getting
Speaker 1: shot and getting their boosters, believing that the government is
Speaker 1: telling them the truth. That's one of my that's one
Speaker 1: of my key missions there is that disavow that idea
Speaker 1: gets you to reject that. Fifty three percent consider the
Speaker 1: drums to be a threat. Seventy eight percent believe the
Speaker 1: government is keeping information that knows on the public. How
Speaker 1: about the fact that they're lying as always say lie
Speaker 1: about all things. They're lying about this as well. Part
Speaker 1: of this, and we've talked about it, is you know,
Speaker 1: there's always an agenda. The question is what are they
Speaker 1: up to distraction? Yeah, definitely that's a part of it.
Speaker 1: But one guy who is a drone operator said, well,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of rules that are coming out about this.
Speaker 1: That's one of the things that they're using it for.
Speaker 1: The owner of a drone company in Mesa, Mesa, Arizona,
Speaker 1: his name's Pete, has seen many ups and downs in
Speaker 1: seven years he's been selling, servicing, and test flying both
Speaker 1: commercial and recreational drones. He said, there's been a lot
Speaker 1: of things that have been going on, especially this holiday season,
Speaker 1: not only with a drone scare, but with the upcoming
Speaker 1: possibility of tariffs again, you know, the tariffs on the
Speaker 1: drones coming from China, because that's primarily where they're coming from,
Speaker 1: especially the ones that are affordable. Why, because they have
Speaker 1: price advantages. They've got cheap labor, they got much much
Speaker 1: cheaper energy and so forth. So yeah, their drones are
Speaker 1: cheaper now. Their technology is very good as well. I'm
Speaker 1: thinking about that Dragon drone display that they did in China.
Speaker 1: Back in twenty twenty two compared to the pathetic display
Speaker 1: that was in Orlando that went wrong. But there's also
Speaker 1: another PPP public private partnership monopoly. I think that's part
Speaker 1: of this. You know, Musk Bezos, Walmart, They're going to
Speaker 1: be allowed to have that space, but not you because
Speaker 1: you small people out there. As Trump said in twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: you're not essential. And so he said it's going to
Speaker 1: be difficult with the tariffs that are there. He said
Speaker 1: these things, though, he said, it's kind of strange because
Speaker 1: he said, these other drones are up there for three
Speaker 1: five hours. You know, who knows what they are? He said,
Speaker 1: And that's one aspect we haven't talked about. You know,
Speaker 1: these they want toss that these are commercial drones or
Speaker 1: hobby drones, that they don't stay up for five hours.
Speaker 1: You know, that's the other issue here. And so I
Speaker 1: just wanted to show you this. This is put up
Speaker 1: by let's see, where is it right here? Here? It
Speaker 1: is right here. It's put up by doggie stylists, said
Speaker 1: Elon's brother, Kimball, is the owner of a company called
Speaker 1: Nova Sky Stories, one of the world's largest fleets of drones.
Speaker 1: His brother Kimball acquired this drone light Show Division twenty
Speaker 1: twenty two formed his company and just to show you
Speaker 1: what this looks like, it is pretty amazing what you
Speaker 1: see in these videos what he's capable of doing. Of
Speaker 1: course some of this is sped up, but still look
Speaker 1: at how they're able to shape this stuff. And this
Speaker 1: is Elon Musk brother. And of course Elon Musk has
Speaker 1: put out memes saying, hey, we need to have the
Speaker 1: drones patrolling the border, right And it's not just Musk,
Speaker 1: but it's also other Peter Thiel Pallanteer connected companies like Androil.
Speaker 1: They want to put high tech stuff at the border
Speaker 1: and control it. And I guess maybe you know what
Speaker 1: they got to do is get rid of all the
Speaker 1: other drone that are out there. It's all part of
Speaker 1: the perspective of shutting everybody down. And when we look
Speaker 1: at the here's Musk talking about putting the drones up.
Speaker 1: He tweets this out Elon Musk daily and retweeted, would
Speaker 1: you support Trump putting me in charge of designing a
Speaker 1: high tech border wall type of thing? And just remember
Speaker 1: that Elon Musk is first and foremost a military industrial
Speaker 1: contractor that's the key thing. Well, we're nearly out of time,
Speaker 1: but I just wanted to wish all of you as
Speaker 1: we close the program, I wish all of you a
Speaker 1: merry Christmas and happy New Year. We'll see you though
Speaker 1: next year before the end of the New year, and
Speaker 1: I just wanted to thank all of you for being
Speaker 1: such a blessing to our family. And I just just
Speaker 1: please look for the real blessing and Christmas. Look for
Speaker 1: christ this year. Thank you. I have a merry Christmas.
Speaker 10: I wish I had a Christmas Night album. You can
Speaker 10: get the Christmas Night Album at the Davidnightshow dot Com
Speaker 10: for just thirteen ninety nine. There's right in the second floor.
Speaker 10: O there, say, what'd you wish, George, Well, not just
Speaker 10: one wish, your whole hat flow.
Speaker 1: First.
Speaker 10: I'm going to the Davidnightshow dot Com and purchase the
Speaker 10: Christmas Night Album. Then I'm gonna listen to Christmas classics
Speaker 10: like are you gonna.
Speaker 6: Throw it Up?
Speaker 4: I want the Christmas Night Album too.
Speaker 6: Yeah, that's pretty good.
Speaker 1: Hello girls, can't you come out tomorrow? Can't you come old?
Speaker 10: David's Christmas Night Album includes twenty one instrumental Christmas melodies
Speaker 10: like God rest you, merry gentlemen, Silent night, and it's
Speaker 10: all new. I'll be home for Christmas.
Speaker 4: What do you want?
Speaker 1: You want the moon?
Speaker 10: Just say the word and I'll throw a glasshole around it,
Speaker 10: pull it down.
Speaker 11: I'll take it, and what and then I'll buy you
Speaker 11: your own download of David Knight's Christmas Night album