Speaker 1: You're listening to KFI AM six forty the Bill Handles
Speaker 1: Show on demand on the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 2: KFI AM six forty Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 2: It's the Bill Handles Show. Bill back from his vacation.
Speaker 2: On Monday, Wayne Resnik here for another hour. Around nine o'clock,
Speaker 2: we're expecting a press conference out of New Orleans with
Speaker 2: updated information about the incident there where somebody plowed their
Speaker 2: car into a group of people in the French Quarter
Speaker 2: section who were celebrating New Year's Eve. Ten people killed,
Speaker 2: at least thirty injured, and then the guy got out
Speaker 2: of the car and started shooting. The cops shot at him,
Speaker 2: and you ended up with two injured cops and one
Speaker 2: dead perpetrator. It was a car with Texas plates. That's
Speaker 2: about all we know about this person. But maybe whenever
Speaker 2: this press conference starts, we'll get some more information. K
Speaker 2: IF I will bring it to you as soon as
Speaker 2: it starts. We have new laws for twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: It is an annual tradition in talk radio that is
Speaker 2: close as close to January one as you can do it.
Speaker 2: You talk about some of the new laws, Well, I
Speaker 2: hit it right on the head January one, let's go
Speaker 2: minimum wage up fifty cent increase for California's minimum wage workers.
Speaker 2: The base pay now sixteen fifty an hour. Why did
Speaker 2: you vote for that? No, In fact, you rejected in
Speaker 2: the election in November. You rejected a ballot measure that
Speaker 2: would have raised the minimum wage immediately to eighteen dollars
Speaker 2: an hour. Well, not immediately, eighteen dollars an hour. By
Speaker 2: twenty twenty six would have gone up now and would
Speaker 2: have gone up again. You said no. But this increase
Speaker 2: is due to the previous minimum wage law that is
Speaker 2: adjusted for inflation, So it's inflation that is causing this
Speaker 2: to happen. Starting in September of this year, colleges and
Speaker 2: universities are banned from giving preferential treatment to family members
Speaker 2: of alumni and donors, the so called legacy admissions. Now
Speaker 2: they're already banned at the public universities, but starting in September, Stanford,
Speaker 2: for example, USC will not be allowed to do it.
Speaker 2: Let me tell you something. Those schools are quaked in
Speaker 2: their boots because if they get caught, here's what's gonna happen.
Speaker 2: Some people are gonna say this is too harsh. If
Speaker 2: there is an allegation of a preferential admission, the Attorney
Speaker 2: General will investigate and can request more information from the university.
Speaker 2: I'm hyperventilating just thinking if that happened to me, if
Speaker 2: somebody asked me for more information. This is my sarcastic
Speaker 2: way of saying, there's really no enforcement mechanism. It's just
Speaker 2: some kind of a law that they passed to I
Speaker 2: don't know shame universities who do it, because I guess
Speaker 2: it would be public anyway. But there's no way. I
Speaker 2: don't know nobody's going to jail. I don't even think
Speaker 2: there are any fines. It's just saying you shouldn't do it,
Speaker 2: and if you do it, then we're gonna know about it,
Speaker 2: and then we're gonna tell everybody that you did it.
Speaker 2: The protections for child actors that have been in effect
Speaker 2: for quite some time in the state of California. It's
Speaker 2: called the Cougan Law, and it was passed a long
Speaker 2: time ago because way back in the day, child actors
Speaker 2: were being exploited and the parents were stealing all their money.
Speaker 2: And there was this child actor, very popular, Jackie Coogan,
Speaker 2: and apparently his parents spent all the money that he made,
Speaker 2: and he made several million dollars, and so they passed
Speaker 2: this law, the Cougan Law, and it requires parents to
Speaker 2: set aside portions of the money for the child. And
Speaker 2: you can't spend all the child's money if you've got
Speaker 2: a precocious child. Actor Will now AB eighteen eighty comes
Speaker 2: along and says, if your child is a vlogger or
Speaker 2: an influencer, same rules apply. What else, You cannot be
Speaker 2: required to attend what they call captive meeting or captive
Speaker 2: audience meetings. This is where an employer will require you
Speaker 2: to come to a meeting, and then the meeting is
Speaker 2: not necessarily about anything relevant. It might be a religious
Speaker 2: message or a political message, or it might be a
Speaker 2: speech about why unions aren't any good and you don't
Speaker 2: really want to join a union. Well, now, if you
Speaker 2: if you make somebody go to one of these things,
Speaker 2: or if you punish them for not going to one
Speaker 2: of these things, you could be fined up to five
Speaker 2: hundred dollars. And there's now a ban on discriminating against
Speaker 2: people because of their hair. This is designed to address
Speaker 2: discrimination generally against people of color who also have hair
Speaker 2: that is culturally associated with their race. And what it
Speaker 2: does is it says race also includes traits that are
Speaker 2: associated with the race, like hair texture or hair styles.
Speaker 2: So there's a little bit of stereotyping necessary in order
Speaker 2: to protect somebody with natural hair or whatever it is
Speaker 2: from being discriminated against for their hair in the workplace.
Speaker 2: Because I think what's really going on is the idea
Speaker 2: is that probably if you say, oh, we had to
Speaker 2: fire you because you had a big halfro that really
Speaker 2: you fired the person because they're black. So if you're
Speaker 2: using hair as a proxy for firing somebody because of
Speaker 2: their race, you won't be able to do it anymore.
Speaker 2: Now there's another law. I'm not going to talk about
Speaker 2: it now because it makes me so mad. I'm going
Speaker 2: to talk about something else to kind of cool down,
Speaker 2: and then I'm going to talk about it a little
Speaker 2: bit later in the show. Another law about where you
Speaker 2: could park your car. That is the proof of an
Speaker 2: ongoing problem with local governments. But when we come back
Speaker 2: from some news from Michael Monks, we are going to
Speaker 2: talk about robots everywhere, including in the kitchens of restaurants
Speaker 2: where there's no human being in there. Yes, the robot report.
Speaker 2: Next on KFI AM six forty Live everywhere on the
Speaker 2: iHeartRadio app. AFI Am six forty Live everywhere on the
Speaker 2: iHeartRadio app. This is the Bill Handles Show. Welcome Bill
Speaker 2: is back from his vacation on Monday. I'm Wayne Resnik.
Speaker 2: We're looking for a press conference around nine am our time.
Speaker 2: The situation in New Orleans where a guy rammed his
Speaker 2: car into a bunch of revelers in the French Quarter
Speaker 2: celebrating New Year's Eve and then got out and started shooting.
Speaker 2: The police engaged him, gunfire was exchanged. Two of the
Speaker 2: cops were injured. The guy's dead, and we hope to
Speaker 2: get some more information about what's going on there, whether
Speaker 2: it's true that they found improvised explosive devices also in
Speaker 2: the area, or whether that is just a rumor, and
Speaker 2: maybe a little information about why this person might have
Speaker 2: done it. We'll bring that to you when it happens.
Speaker 2: Also closer to home, flu cases are spiking here in
Speaker 2: southern California. According to the California Department Public Health. Across
Speaker 2: the whole state, they describe the flu activity levels as moderate,
Speaker 2: but Southern California has a disproportionately high number of flu cases.
Speaker 2: So do with that information anything that you want, or
Speaker 2: don't do anything. Sometimes when you go eat at a restaurant,
Speaker 2: and this usually is a big deal at a fancy restaurant,
Speaker 2: but it doesn't have to be. Sometimes you may be
Speaker 2: invited back to the kitchen. If you're like a regular customer,
Speaker 2: or if it's a particularly expensive meal, you may be
Speaker 2: invited back to go to the kitchen and see it
Speaker 2: and maybe meet the chef. This is a big deal.
Speaker 2: But imagine you are invited to go back to the
Speaker 2: kitchen and there's nobody in the kitchen, not a human
Speaker 2: being to be found. Maybe it's the mayor d comes
Speaker 2: over and says, oh, would you'd like to see the kitchen.
Speaker 2: You're such a good diner, And then there's nobody there. Well,
Speaker 2: how's the food getting made? The answer is the button kit.
Speaker 2: Button Kit is a robot chef. Not only can button
Speaker 2: kit cook the meal, botton kick button Kit. I'm gonna
Speaker 2: say it wrong every time. It's kind of a tongue twister,
Speaker 2: botton kit. I'm just gonna start saying the robot okay,
Speaker 2: can we agree? Thank you? The robot can also clean up.
Speaker 2: You don't need a chef. You don't need a dishwasher,
Speaker 2: you just need botton Kit. So you can upload the recipe.
Speaker 2: You can even upload the recipe through the cloud remotely,
Speaker 2: or it has a touchscreen botton Kit, and you can
Speaker 2: touch the thing you want and you can alter it
Speaker 2: like you could say, I want the I'm just making
Speaker 2: up a thing pod Thai noodle medium spicy or something
Speaker 2: like that. And it's programmed. It knows all this stuff
Speaker 2: and boom, there it goes. It gets out of bowl
Speaker 2: and it chops the thing and it dispenses the seasonings,
Speaker 2: and the bowl magically becomes the cooking pan and it
Speaker 2: cooks the thing up and it does the thing and
Speaker 2: it dumps it on the plate. Yeah. Now, this is
Speaker 2: part of a bigger trend of robots showing up all
Speaker 2: over the place. But the company behind button Kit, the
Speaker 2: chef Robot, which is mostly in Asia right now but
Speaker 2: has set up business here in the United States. They're
Speaker 2: saying the company says, oh no, no, we're not trying
Speaker 2: to replace human chefs. That's not the point of botton Kit.
Speaker 2: There still will be human chefs. No chefs are going
Speaker 2: to be harmed by the robot chef. The human chefs
Speaker 2: will still be involved in the recipe creation. I mean,
Speaker 2: you still have to have a chef come up with
Speaker 2: the recipes that they want to serve at the restaurant.
Speaker 2: And also the chef will be able, the human chef
Speaker 2: will be able to participate a little bit in the cooking.
Speaker 2: They can add their personal touch in the last part
Speaker 2: when the robot's done so, if he's made the pod
Speaker 2: time medium spicy, and then the chef wants to like
Speaker 2: place I don't know, the basil leaf, a decorative basil
Speaker 2: leaf on top of it, He'll still be able to
Speaker 2: do that, or she'll still be able to do that,
Speaker 2: or they'll still be able to do that. And in
Speaker 2: the meantime, you know, robots, like a robot chef in
Speaker 2: a kitchen is not really public facing. But there is
Speaker 2: a trend now where robots are entering the public world.
Speaker 2: They're not just in the factory or the warehouse or
Speaker 2: the kitchen. They're in the retail store or the museum.
Speaker 2: They're doing stuff right in front of you, and sometimes
Speaker 2: they're doing stuff with you, like talking to you. This
Speaker 2: is the new trend, and they say it's because of
Speaker 2: AI and specifically the technology that run uns chat GPT
Speaker 2: is making this possible to improve the brain power of
Speaker 2: these robots. This really sounds like the first act of
Speaker 2: a science fiction movie that ends with the robots killing
Speaker 2: all the people and living amongst themselves. But we're still
Speaker 2: in the first act at this point. I don't know
Speaker 2: how much brain power we need a robot to have,
Speaker 2: although you know, even an advanced robot is also kind
Speaker 2: of a dummy. There's a lot of things that you
Speaker 2: can program a robot to do, and they can do
Speaker 2: it better or faster or more accurately than a human,
Speaker 2: or more consistently accurately than a human. There are other
Speaker 2: things that are really really hard for robots to do
Speaker 2: that are dead simple for you, like picking something up
Speaker 2: and moving it. That's a big deal because you have
Speaker 2: to use code. Right now, You program code and it
Speaker 2: tells the robot how to pick up something and move it,
Speaker 2: which means they can only pick up the thing they're
Speaker 2: programmed to pick up, and they can only move it
Speaker 2: however their program to move it. Whereas I could ask you,
Speaker 2: could you please pick up anything in the room, whatever
Speaker 2: it is, you don't know what I'm gonna ask, and
Speaker 2: I can ask you to pick up anything, and I
Speaker 2: can ask you to put it anywhere else and you
Speaker 2: can do it no problem. A C student can do it,
Speaker 2: no problem. But a smart robot right now can't do it.
Speaker 2: So there's a long way to go before a robot
Speaker 2: is going to be smarter than me, that's for sure.
Speaker 2: We'll get some news from Michael Monks and then I
Speaker 2: have called an audible. We had something we were gonna do,
Speaker 2: but I saw one of the new laws in California
Speaker 2: that took effect, and I'm not it's making me mad
Speaker 2: because it's part of a huge problem. If you dare
Speaker 2: to be a person who drives a car, I'm gonna
Speaker 2: tell you what's been going on and why if it
Speaker 2: feels like your local government is against you, I'm gonna
Speaker 2: tell you why it feels that way. Spoiler alert, it's
Speaker 2: because they are. It's KFI AM six forty Live everywhere
Speaker 2: on the iHeartRadio app. You're listening to Bill Handle on
Speaker 2: demand from KFI AM six forty. KFI AM six forty
Speaker 2: Live everywhere on the iHeart Radio app. It's the Bill
Speaker 2: Handle Show. He's back from vacation. On Monday, Wayne resumes
Speaker 2: sitting in until nine and one thing I want to
Speaker 2: tell you about very quickly, this story that we're looking at.
Speaker 2: Federal prosecutors are trying to keep a guy behind bars
Speaker 2: and not get out on bail after they made the
Speaker 2: largest seizure of homemade explosives in FBI history. This is
Speaker 2: some guy named Brad Spafford who lives in Isle of
Speaker 2: Wight County, Virginia, which I'm assuming is way in the
Speaker 2: middle of nothing. It's about one hundred and eighty five
Speaker 2: miles south of DC. They arrested him for having a
Speaker 2: short barreled rifle and then they found over one hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty homemade bombs. Then he had some stuff in
Speaker 2: his freezer that it's called HMTD. It's an explosive and
Speaker 2: it HMTD is so volatile that it will explode if
Speaker 2: the temperature changes a few degrees. And he had that.
Speaker 2: And here's the reason I'm telling you about this guy,
Speaker 2: because it didn't happen here, happened on the other side
Speaker 2: of the country. But he has how many fingers do
Speaker 2: you have? Yes, he has two. And this is one
Speaker 2: of the big deals that the prosecutors are making in
Speaker 2: telling the judge you should never let this guy out
Speaker 2: on bond. Is even after losing his own fingers, he
Speaker 2: still had over one hundred and fifty homemade bombs in
Speaker 2: this highly volatile explosive at his house in the freezer.
Speaker 2: Not a special explosive freezer, No, the regular family freezer
Speaker 2: where the Swanson frozen dinners are and the Ben and
Speaker 2: Jerry's are kept, and then this stuff is in there.
Speaker 2: So originally the judge said, well, I'm gonna let him out,
Speaker 2: and the prosecutor said, we have some more evidence. So
Speaker 2: now the judge's looking at that trying to decide what
Speaker 2: to do with this guy. Talk about not learning, and
Speaker 2: I'll talk about this not learning. There's a new law
Speaker 2: that is taken effect that says you cannot park now
Speaker 2: within twenty feet of an intersection, even if the curb
Speaker 2: is not red. You obviously notice as you drive around
Speaker 2: that as you get close to the intersection, then the
Speaker 2: curb is red and you know, oh yeah, don't park there. Well,
Speaker 2: some curbs are not red and you have been allowed
Speaker 2: to park there. No longer red or not. You can't
Speaker 2: park your car within twenty feet of an intersection. Which
Speaker 2: in some parts of the country where they also do
Speaker 2: have this law, it doesn't necessarily matter because anywhere you
Speaker 2: go there's plenty of parking, but in southern California, in
Speaker 2: parts of LA in particular, they're how much is not
Speaker 2: So they're definitely taking away parking to protect pedestrians. That's
Speaker 2: what the point of this is. If a car is
Speaker 2: parked too close to the intersection, I guess the pedestrian
Speaker 2: can't see the traffic as well, and instead of just
Speaker 2: being really careful and kind of leaning out and taking
Speaker 2: some responsibility for not getting smashed by a car, they're
Speaker 2: just walking out dooty do. And then they go did
Speaker 2: and see there was a car perk there. So here's
Speaker 2: the thing. And I don't have a ton of time,
Speaker 2: and I don't need a ton of time because I
Speaker 2: saw this new law and I said, yep, here we
Speaker 2: go again. If you feel like there's a bias against
Speaker 2: you as a driver, it's because there's a massive bias
Speaker 2: against you as a driver. And it wasn't always this way,
Speaker 2: you know. When the car first came out, it was
Speaker 2: one of the most amazing and important invention of human history.
Speaker 2: It changed lives, It changed how business is done, It
Speaker 2: changed how work and home life was balanced. It changed
Speaker 2: the economy and the FEDS built a lot of freeway
Speaker 2: system and a lot of stuff, and states and local
Speaker 2: governments they were very happy to spend money building roads
Speaker 2: to accommodate these cars because these cars were amazing and magical.
Speaker 2: Now cars are evil. So here's the thing. Why does
Speaker 2: it feel like there's a bias against us for driving
Speaker 2: our cars? Reason one. One thing that's happened to state
Speaker 2: and local governments over the decades is they have become
Speaker 2: more and more financially unstable and leveraged, running deficits, having
Speaker 2: to get cutting services, unable to simply operate. Roads are
Speaker 2: very expensive to build, so a road project that would
Speaker 2: help alleviate car traffic is a very expensive proposition, and
Speaker 2: if you're part of a city council or a county
Speaker 2: commission or a state agency, you don't want to commit
Speaker 2: to spending that kind of money because you don't have it.
Speaker 2: You know what's not as expensive bike lane bustling. Taking
Speaker 2: a traffic lane and giving it over to the bikes.
Speaker 2: That doesn't cost very much money at all. Putting up
Speaker 2: pylons to separate a bike lane from the rest of
Speaker 2: the street doesn't cost very much money. So because governments
Speaker 2: have become so financially irresponsible. Now they look at road
Speaker 2: projects to help alleviate your traffic in your car as evil.
Speaker 2: And then there's a completely different thing that's happened with
Speaker 2: state and local governments. They've become more political and activist.
Speaker 2: Sixty years ago, local governments they really were just like,
Speaker 2: all right, we got to have the roads and the
Speaker 2: police and the fire and the water and the thing,
Speaker 2: and what's the best way to do it. Then they
Speaker 2: started getting involved in causes. They started getting involved in
Speaker 2: trying to operate a city in a way to try
Speaker 2: to get people to behave certain ways that they want.
Speaker 2: And we all know with global warming and pollution that
Speaker 2: one of the things that has been decided is people
Speaker 2: should be encouraged to give up their car and ride
Speaker 2: a bike or take public transportation or if it's close enough,
Speaker 2: walk over there. So they don't want to spend the
Speaker 2: money or where they can't, they can't really spend the
Speaker 2: money because they're too irresponsible on building out the roads.
Speaker 2: But they also wouldn't probably if they could, because they
Speaker 2: now make decisions to disadvantage drivers and give basically privileges
Speaker 2: to bikers and pedestrians. And this law is a perfect
Speaker 2: example of deciding that it's more important to try to
Speaker 2: predect to protect some dumb ass from walking out into
Speaker 2: the middle of the street where he can't see the traffic,
Speaker 2: then to maybe have enough parking for you when you
Speaker 2: go to patronize a business or pick up your kid
Speaker 2: from a ballet class. They're making their choices, they're showing
Speaker 2: their preferences. This law is an example of that, and
Speaker 2: it's only gonna get worse. There's never getting better. There's
Speaker 2: never gonna be a pay some things. There's a pendulum
Speaker 2: swing tough on crime. Let's have criminal justice reform. No,
Speaker 2: let's get tough on crime again. There will never be
Speaker 2: a pendulum swing back to paying for infrastructure for cars.
Speaker 2: Let's get some news from Michael Monks, and then we're
Speaker 2: gonna finish the show. Everybody's talking about should you drink
Speaker 2: raw milk? And experts say no, But did you know
Speaker 2: there's something else you can drink that's raw that you
Speaker 2: didn't even know could be raw. I will tell you
Speaker 2: what's going on. It's KFI AM six forty live everywhere
Speaker 2: on the iHeartRadio app, KFI AM sixty live everywhere on
Speaker 2: the iHeartRadio app. This is the bill handles show. Wayne
Speaker 2: Resnick's sitting in for a few more minutes sometime around nine,
Speaker 2: So in the next ten minutes or so, we're expecting
Speaker 2: a press conference out of New Orleans with updates on
Speaker 2: the the I don't even know what to call it.
Speaker 2: I know they're calling it a terrorist attack. Somebody plowed
Speaker 2: into a group of revelers in the French Quarter with
Speaker 2: his car, killed, at least ten injured, at least thirty
Speaker 2: others got out, started shooting. Cops shot back. Two of
Speaker 2: the cops were injured. The guy is dead, and we'll
Speaker 2: bring that press conference to you as soon as it happens. Also,
Speaker 2: huge blackout hit almost all of Puerto Rico yesterday. There
Speaker 2: was an underground power line that one of the most
Speaker 2: important power lines in their whole grid, and it failed
Speaker 2: and they think it could be another two days before
Speaker 2: everybody is back online. Now, there's been some coverage in
Speaker 2: the news of the controversy about raw milk, and you
Speaker 2: know there's there. I guess there's a growing group of
Speaker 2: people who say we want to be allowed to drink
Speaker 2: raw milk, and the government says, oh no, it's dangerous.
Speaker 2: It could have a bunch of crap in it and bacteria,
Speaker 2: and it needs to be pasteurized, and that's why we
Speaker 2: pasteurize it. So here's the thing, because there's always something weirder,
Speaker 2: no matter what's in the news, and you go kind
Speaker 2: it's so weird. There's always something weirder. So if you
Speaker 2: were to drive up in northern California, in Marin County,
Speaker 2: there's there's a pull out there on the road. It's
Speaker 2: very small if you if you're not looking for it,
Speaker 2: you probably we might not even notice it, except that
Speaker 2: you might see a group of people there and some
Speaker 2: of them have driven hours, they've said, in traffic to
Speaker 2: get there. And that's Red Rock Spring for you. See,
Speaker 2: the people gathered there have decided they will only drink
Speaker 2: water that comes from the pipes of Red Rock Spring.
Speaker 2: They will not drink tap water, they will not drink
Speaker 2: bottled water. They will only drink this water. And they
Speaker 2: call it raw water. Now you may call it untreated water,
Speaker 2: but they call it raw water. They do not want
Speaker 2: to drink the water that goes through the government's water
Speaker 2: treatment systems, even though that's where you get rid of
Speaker 2: the bacteria that could kill you or Parrisie or certain
Speaker 2: chemical toxins that could, I don't know, make your child
Speaker 2: not develop properly in their brain. And this is I'm
Speaker 2: not saying it's big business, because it really isn't a business.
Speaker 2: It's a trend. It's a fad maybe. And most of
Speaker 2: these people are part of the health freedom movement. This
Speaker 2: is the health freedom movement is we don't like vaccine mandates,
Speaker 2: we don't like mask mandates, we don't want fluoride in
Speaker 2: our water. We don't want our milk to be pasteurized,
Speaker 2: and we don't want our water being treated. We want
Speaker 2: to drink it right out of the spring, naturally. And
Speaker 2: they're going to have an ally now in the federal
Speaker 2: government Robert F. Kennedy Junior, who President elect Trump is
Speaker 2: picked to lead health in Human Services. He uh, you know,
Speaker 2: he's spoken out on a lot of these things. He's
Speaker 2: not on the record yet about raw water, so I
Speaker 2: don't know where he stands on that, but he has
Speaker 2: talked about flora. He wants the flooride out of the water.
Speaker 2: So people are so into this that they crowd source
Speaker 2: maps of springs that you can go to and drink
Speaker 2: natural right out of the ground raw water at Red
Speaker 2: Rock Spring which is near. If you're trying to place it,
Speaker 2: it's mere Stinton Beach. If you know where that is,
Speaker 2: it doesn't matter. You're not gonna if your life. I
Speaker 2: want to drive up there now and drink that raw water,
Speaker 2: then God speed to you. You have to wait in line.
Speaker 2: You can wait at forty five minutes an hour just
Speaker 2: to drink this raw water. And it's not just there,
Speaker 2: you might say, h northern California, of course, what do
Speaker 2: you expect. Oh no, No, it's all over the country.
Speaker 2: There's a place in South Carolina where there are two
Speaker 2: spigots in the ground and they bring up water from
Speaker 2: some underground spring. And people flock to this place in
Speaker 2: the middle of rural South Carolina to get water from
Speaker 2: these two spigots. And then you've got people, you know,
Speaker 2: trying to capitalize on the traffic. They're selling oranges and
Speaker 2: pecans and watermelon, all this stuff. It's it's like a stuckies,
Speaker 2: except it's for people to get water out of the ground.
Speaker 2: In Oklahoma, there's people who drive for hours because there's
Speaker 2: a natural well there that they say it has healing
Speaker 2: water in it. Because it's raw, there might be so
Speaker 2: little something to it. If it's coming directly out of
Speaker 2: the ground, and it comes through layers of the soil.
Speaker 2: It's possible that it does get filtered of some of
Speaker 2: some pathogens, but nobody really knows for sure, and there's
Speaker 2: no way that it's as clean as treated water. There
Speaker 2: absolutely could be arsenic in there the soil E coli.
Speaker 2: God knows what's in there. So the next time somebody says,
Speaker 2: do you want to go drink some raw, they might
Speaker 2: not be talking about milk. They might be talking about
Speaker 2: H two O. All right, that's me. Wayne Resnick and
Speaker 2: Gary Shannon are next. This is KFI AM six forty
Speaker 2: live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1: You've been listening to the Bill Handle Show. Catch my
Speaker 1: show Monday through Friday six am to nine am, and
Speaker 1: anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.