Speaker 1: It wasn't just some random country that was mediocre by accident.
Speaker 1: America was subjected to very intense levels of psychological warfare,
Speaker 1: attacks through the food, attacks through the culture, that resulted
Speaker 1: in the degradation of the society into the halfway collapse
Speaker 1: that we're already seeing. The question is how do we
Speaker 1: get here and how do we get out of this?
Speaker 1: I think in order to understand how we got there,
Speaker 1: it's good to read people that talked about this and
Speaker 1: what was coming back in the nineteen nineties. In fact,
Speaker 1: there was a book We're In the nineteen ninety two
Speaker 1: that talked about the entirety of this plan being rolled
Speaker 1: out by our day, and particularly bringing in foreign entities,
Speaker 1: weapons of mass migration, so to speak, and what effect
Speaker 1: that would have on the native population, combined with the
Speaker 1: toxic culture, combined with all the other elements that were
Speaker 1: part of the Tavistock New World Order, you could say
Speaker 1: Club of Rome plan. In fact, one member of the
Speaker 1: Club of Rome went and talked to people in the
Speaker 1: White House back in the nineteen seventies, and they were
Speaker 1: talking about different projects and entities that they could use
Speaker 1: to bring about these plans. You've heard me talk before
Speaker 1: about the discussions with a Kissinger during that time period
Speaker 1: when the Kissinger really adopted the eugenics Malthusian worldview, not
Speaker 1: just for the Third world like most people think, but
Speaker 1: actually for the entire Western world, and so part of
Speaker 1: this plan it's known as the twenty twenty five Report.
Speaker 1: Of the twenty twenty report, you can find different versions
Speaker 1: of it, but in the very prophetic book written by
Speaker 1: a former British intelligence operative doctor John Coleman, he lists
Speaker 1: a series of things that they would plan this is
Speaker 1: back in the seventies, that they would try to roll
Speaker 1: out within the next several decades. And I'm going to
Speaker 1: read some of the elements of this and we're going
Speaker 1: to see what we think in terms of how much
Speaker 1: of this has come to pass. And you're going to
Speaker 1: notice that the open borders agenda is also a huge
Speaker 1: part of this plan, and it was discussed decades ago
Speaker 1: as a way to weaken the existing population, to drive
Speaker 1: down wages, but more than all that, to really socially
Speaker 1: engineer and create a new culture in the West. The
Speaker 1: first element that was listed in this discussion from the
Speaker 1: New World Order was the creation first and foremost of
Speaker 1: a one world order. This one world order needed first
Speaker 1: of all, a unified religion, a kind of a New
Speaker 1: World Order church, so to speak, as well as a
Speaker 1: one world government that would be set up sometime around
Speaker 1: perhaps the nineteen twenties and thirties, at least modeled on
Speaker 1: what was set up in the twenties and thirties with
Speaker 1: the League of Nations and then the later United Nations.
Speaker 1: That would have to be probably replaced down the road,
Speaker 1: or it would have to be given some kind of
Speaker 1: new authority and power rather than just being some sort
Speaker 1: of cultural debate forum. This religion would need to be
Speaker 1: based on a mix of the other religions, probably something
Speaker 1: like a blended Christianity or Islam or something New Age
Speaker 1: Chrislam or something New Age, and we already see, by
Speaker 1: the way Corstovatican pushing the idea of the monotheistic faith center,
Speaker 1: where all of the religions are really combined in the
Speaker 1: Abi Dhabi Faith Center. Number two would be the removal
Speaker 1: and the destruction of all nation state identity and national
Speaker 1: pride that would have to be demonized and classed under racism.
Speaker 1: Of course, we've seen that immensely in the pushed out
Speaker 1: in the last twenty years, and people forget that the
Speaker 1: academic system, the university system, is one of the main
Speaker 1: tools for how this social engineering and how this mind
Speaker 1: control actually occurs. In fact, universities are kind of like
Speaker 1: California and New York. They pioneer and roll this stuff
Speaker 1: out decades ahead of the rest of the country, excepting
Speaker 1: at Middle America, a flyover country. So they pushed the brainwashing,
Speaker 1: and then the graduates then go into corporations hr you know,
Speaker 1: that become sort of the spokesman, and then that is
Speaker 1: what results in the corporations eventually after several years, you know,
Speaker 1: becoming woke because the people who go into the corporations
Speaker 1: have been through the corporate brainwashing system of the university.
Speaker 1: Now you might think, well, the university is a state thing,
Speaker 1: or it's perhaps private. All of these entities are really
Speaker 1: joined at the top. That's the point. It doesn't really
Speaker 1: matter whether we're talking about public or private at this level,
Speaker 1: because this plan was essentially a private corporate plan that
Speaker 1: really took over government a long time ago, or you
Speaker 1: could say it took over the government in various stages
Speaker 1: to entrench itself and to really push the same agen
Speaker 1: to the same plan, and it became eventually global, and
Speaker 1: I think everybody saw that in the COVID era because
Speaker 1: the entire world, in terms of the Fortune one hundred,
Speaker 1: fortune five hundred, was enforcing the same policies, pushing the
Speaker 1: same hashtags, pushing all the same you know, put this
Speaker 1: black image in your profile picture, or you don't, or
Speaker 1: you're racist, you know, wear a mask, social distance, get
Speaker 1: your stabbes. Basically every corporation in the world, Megacorp was
Speaker 1: on board with that, and that shows that there's already
Speaker 1: a sort of an entrenched governing body of corporate elites
Speaker 1: and government elites. They all collude together. It's a revolving
Speaker 1: door at a very high level that are planning a
Speaker 1: corporate technocratic socialism. Where do we get corporate technocratic socialism. Well,
Speaker 1: we have to go back to what John Coleman wrote
Speaker 1: this book about the Committee of three hundred, which is
Speaker 1: the British East India Company. And this became really the
Speaker 1: ultimate corporation of its time. It was making more money
Speaker 1: in a day or a week than even if we
Speaker 1: adjust for you know, the time difference even corporations today,
Speaker 1: so probably bigger than Apple or something like that. And
Speaker 1: so they were really above the government even they could
Speaker 1: do pretty much whatever they wanted. And they didn't just
Speaker 1: specialize in furs and you know goods like that. They
Speaker 1: also specialized in slave trade and narcotics, opium, all kinds
Speaker 1: of goods, so to speak. So this was really a
Speaker 1: corporate slavery that existed under the British East India Company,
Speaker 1: and they were really tied at the hip to the
Speaker 1: British government. So there wasn't really a difference between these
Speaker 1: two entities, and one could even argue that corporate governance
Speaker 1: existed prior to that, even with perhaps the Vatican. Maybe
Speaker 1: the Vatican is the world's oldest sort of corporation government
Speaker 1: nation state. It's its own city state, it's not subjected
Speaker 1: to any laws anywhere else. And its bank, of course
Speaker 1: is the most secretive bank in the world, which provided
Speaker 1: of course a bunch of liquidity and secrecy for black
Speaker 1: operations during the Cold War, particularly drug running, drug trafficking,
Speaker 1: arms running, and Operation Gladio, which we've covered many, many times.
Speaker 1: So the corporate model functions as a perfect sort of
Speaker 1: inner almost roundtable model. If you look at the roundtable
Speaker 1: society group out of the UK and Cecil Roads and
Speaker 1: those characters really their secret model of an inner core
Speaker 1: elite of twelve people that they originally planned. It's kind
Speaker 1: of like a corporate governing board. So they're just calling
Speaker 1: it the roundtable and the wise Men, but it's the
Speaker 1: same type of structure of a kind of a corporatocracy
Speaker 1: or a It's like Plato's Council of the Night, which
Speaker 1: exists in his later works, where the Republic Magnesia is
Speaker 1: no longer run by one philosopher king, it's it's actually
Speaker 1: run by a board of oligarchs or basically intelligence operatives.
Speaker 1: Because if you listen to Plato, he describes that the
Speaker 1: governance board of Magnesia meets at night, since the Council
Speaker 1: to night because they operating secrecy, They send out spies,
Speaker 1: they govern the country without the knowledge of the people,
Speaker 1: because of course, the people are too stupid and they
Speaker 1: need to be governed by this kind of esoteric elite.
Speaker 1: And interestingly, John Coleman in his book, I'm not saying
Speaker 1: I agree with everything in this book. I think he
Speaker 1: got some things wrong, but writing this in nineteen ninety
Speaker 1: two is pretty profound because he was way ahead of
Speaker 1: his time, especially with the calls for technocracy and open
Speaker 1: border that he predicted that that would be really essential
Speaker 1: to this plan and they would roll that out in
Speaker 1: the next several decades. He goes on to talk about
Speaker 1: after the destruction of the idea of America, American patriots
Speaker 1: has been pride the destruction of all religions as they
Speaker 1: are known, and particularly the Christian religion. Isn't interesting that
Speaker 1: they have to really destroy Christianity because that's the lynchpin
Speaker 1: upon which Western civilization is built, and ideologically speaking, and
Speaker 1: that really means all the branches of Christianity, Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism,
Speaker 1: and even Protestantism, they all have to really be diluted, infiltrated,
Speaker 1: destroyed from within or co opted to become just sort
Speaker 1: of cutouts for Americanism in the Cold War and then
Speaker 1: eventually for the New World Order after the Cold War. So,
Speaker 1: now that we're post Cold War, the alliances that the
Speaker 1: CIA made with so many churches and religious institutions during
Speaker 1: the Cold War, unfortunately it has led to them now
Speaker 1: being kind of tools for that same agenda. And that's
Speaker 1: precisely why Francis, for example, supports all the Davos agenda.
Speaker 1: Now he goes on to talk about the control of
Speaker 1: every single person through some form of electronic or some
Speaker 1: form of mind control. And this is his definition of technocracy,
Speaker 1: and he's gotten it from Brazinski's book from nineteen seventy three.
Speaker 1: Between two ages, we've covered that many, many, many times.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to rehearse all that, but basically, the
Speaker 1: idea would be to robatize man, to make men more
Speaker 1: and mo or robotic, be that through a feedback loop
Speaker 1: of the information that he gets through the Internet, making
Speaker 1: him more and more of a kind of a spurg
Speaker 1: or through actual modification of humans through implantable chips, nanotech, signals, manipulation,
Speaker 1: all the above. Really, if you read Brazenski's book, he
Speaker 1: pauses all of these as possibilities for the technocratic system
Speaker 1: when it rolls out. And we know that that was
Speaker 1: the plan that was chosen because it was really that
Speaker 1: book that caught the attention of David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger.
Speaker 1: So they were really impressed with Brazenski's book. I've got
Speaker 1: it up here on my shelf. And when he wrote
Speaker 1: that he was recruited into working for the establishment. There's
Speaker 1: really only one establishment. It's the people like this right here.
Speaker 1: The Rockefellers are there. That's who runs it. That's who
Speaker 1: set up the OSS and the CIA, That's who's aligned
Speaker 1: with the British role, Society, Elites, the role in supernantal
Speaker 1: International fingers, how the House, et cetera. It's all the
Speaker 1: same establishment. All these different things are all part of
Speaker 1: the same octopus. They're all just tentacles on the same octopus.
Speaker 1: So I'll get confused in all the entities, but just
Speaker 1: keep in mind that ultimately they're all the same people
Speaker 1: in all these entities, and these different frontice pieces and
Speaker 1: foundations and thing tanks and all that are really pushing
Speaker 1: the same thing. And that's essentially Skynet here. Now, I'm
Speaker 1: not saying all tech is bad, or that all even
Speaker 1: implantable stuff is bad. I have family members that have
Speaker 1: Parkinson's that have benefited from these kinds of things. So
Speaker 1: it's not that the tech itself is bad. It's that
Speaker 1: the system wants to utilize these things for total tracing
Speaker 1: and control. And I think everybody finally realized that the
Speaker 1: so called conspiracy people were correct when we saw during
Speaker 1: COVID the push for vaccine passports, tracking, tracing, all of that,
Speaker 1: especially the Gates Foundation and everything with id that the
Speaker 1: Gates was pushing that that's definitely what they wanted, and
Speaker 1: even to this day you have people like Tony Blair
Speaker 1: still pushing a digital tracking and tracing control grid to
Speaker 1: make sure that you don't use too much carbon. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's essentially where it's going, right. It's not just about
Speaker 1: your health, so to speak, in terms of whether you
Speaker 1: contracted some fake, made up scam virus out of Wuhan
Speaker 1: or whatever, but whether or not you were actually, as
Speaker 1: a human being a threat to society because of too
Speaker 1: much carbon output. And so really carbon tracking, tracing all
Speaker 1: that that's about controlling population. And controlling population doesn't just
Speaker 1: mean getting the population numbers down. That also means controlling you,
Speaker 1: tracking and tracing you on a day to day basis
Speaker 1: and everything that you do. And that's why he goes
Speaker 1: on to say the next part of this plan would
Speaker 1: be to end all industrial in this industry and a
Speaker 1: nustralization in the West and particularly cheap energy and cheap
Speaker 1: power to eventually reach what the Club of Rome had
Speaker 1: deemed was the zero growth society sometimes called ZPGS or
Speaker 1: a population growth But it's not just about population it's
Speaker 1: also zero economic growth. So what they want in the West,
Speaker 1: what they wanted for many, many years, was to de
Speaker 1: industrialize the West and through different government deals, send a
Speaker 1: lot of the industry purposefully overseas or China and other
Speaker 1: countries to be built up. And then they say, well,
Speaker 1: nobody in America wants to work, which is not true.
Speaker 1: This is actually a top down agenda that was determined.
Speaker 1: And I mean this plan would have been way worse
Speaker 1: and they would have gotten way further by the way
Speaker 1: if they had created the North American Union. If remember
Speaker 1: that back in the day, alex used to protest that
Speaker 1: they wanted to create a corridor where they would have
Speaker 1: a giant row that would go from Canada all the
Speaker 1: way down to Mexico. And the purpose of this was
Speaker 1: really ultimately to damage the American workers and to utilize
Speaker 1: cheap foreign labor. And that's really a big part of
Speaker 1: everything that's a problem in the country, because it's not
Speaker 1: even so much about the cheap labor, but ultimately it's
Speaker 1: an issue of libertarian philosophy, which Silicon Valley reports to
Speaker 1: often believe, and in fact, I think in the early
Speaker 1: stages a lot of people do believe in it. And
Speaker 1: then what happens is, and I'm not picking out anybody
Speaker 1: in particular, I think this happens across the board. Sometimes
Speaker 1: government comes in and buys out. Sometimes there's contracts between
Speaker 1: private entities and government which allows certain companies to get
Speaker 1: an edge, tax breaks, whatever. We saw this, especially with
Speaker 1: some of the big Silicon Valley companies that got seed
Speaker 1: funding from DARPA and the CIA, Facebook and others. And
Speaker 1: so what happens then is you get this sort of
Speaker 1: monopoly and oligopoly with these entities that can then have
Speaker 1: an immense amount of power to then try to say
Speaker 1: that they're going to fix society or whatever. But what
Speaker 1: happens is that there's a there's there there's a clash
Speaker 1: of duties or obligations because on the one hand, the
Speaker 1: corporation has obligations to the shareholders and they have obligations
Speaker 1: to uh save money, perhaps billions of dollars with labor.
Speaker 1: But at the same time, the population, the workers, the
Speaker 1: existing demographic group, they might have other allegiances that are
Speaker 1: not ultimately two shareholders or to a bottom line. So
Speaker 1: now we have a conflict between two allegiances within society.
Speaker 1: And this, for example, is why kings in part, I
Speaker 1: mean kings were oftentimes corrupt and not trying to just
Speaker 1: say kings were good. But one reason there were tariffs
Speaker 1: was because it was a protection for workers within that country.
Speaker 1: That meant that you couldn't just bring in foreign workers
Speaker 1: that would do the same word for pennies on the
Speaker 1: dollar and then send that money back home. There was
Speaker 1: a protection there through through the through the tariff, and
Speaker 1: I don't know to what degree that does or doesn't
Speaker 1: exist in America anymore. I mean Trump has made positive
Speaker 1: statements about bringing back truffs. I think that's a good
Speaker 1: idea that would definitely help the country, but there isn't
Speaker 1: coordinated plans when I'm trying to say that. Ultimately it
Speaker 1: is all about de industrializing the entire West and especially
Speaker 1: the United States, because for the technocratic, corporate socialist government
Speaker 1: to come about America is really a big problem, and
Speaker 1: especially Middle America. That's why the coastal cities hate Middle
Speaker 1: America so much, is because they're part and parcel in
Speaker 1: this philosophy of creating a global socialist, technocratic order. And unfortunately,
Speaker 1: as ah she Well said, sometimes libertarians can actually help
Speaker 1: participate in that because it's libertarian companies. Supposedly, Silicon Valley
Speaker 1: had this sort of libertarian ethos for so long that
Speaker 1: really builds the infrastructure that then can be turned over
Speaker 1: to a socialist control, even though they have built a
Speaker 1: company for so long on the basis of liberty and freedom.
Speaker 1: But then it becomes Facebook. Classic example, right, Silicon Valley,
Speaker 1: it's free market. Supposedly, all the developers, investors and all
Speaker 1: this pile in and then you as humans contribute all
Speaker 1: the energy and all the information to essentially make Facebook
Speaker 1: as a test case, into a giant entity that is
Speaker 1: basically spying on everyone's data collection all that which has
Speaker 1: all now been admitted, but it should have been evident
Speaker 1: from the beginning because of course it was funded by
Speaker 1: CI money inqtail money from the very get go. But
Speaker 1: you can see that that was an example where even
Speaker 1: under the auspices of free market and all the people
Speaker 1: coming to it to be freely expressing their ideas, over
Speaker 1: time it clamped down and shut down everybody's speech and
Speaker 1: was stealing everyone's data and was colluding with government. And
Speaker 1: then Zuckerberg apologizes all my bad, sorry, I like Trump now. Right,
Speaker 1: So that's a great example. What I'm talking about where
Speaker 1: the libertarian phase was used to sort of dupe everyone,
Speaker 1: get them there, and then it flips over into a
Speaker 1: technocratic control. So we always have to be leary of
Speaker 1: this and this possibility, and so many tech companies have
Speaker 1: done this exact same planet model to where it appears
Speaker 1: libertarian and free and then it switches. So industrialization is
Speaker 1: something that won't actually work though if you export this
Speaker 1: to places where the labor is subpar, or importation of
Speaker 1: entities and people that are subpar, this will actually destroy
Speaker 1: the existing companies. So it doesn't seem very feasible to
Speaker 1: me other than through enforce DEI measures, which I totally
Speaker 1: disagree with. It doesn't make sense to actually do this.
Speaker 1: Why would you enforce these policies which actually hurt the
Speaker 1: companies And I don't just mean woke, I mean like
Speaker 1: hiring policies like diversity equity inclusion, which would actually not
Speaker 1: be based on the merit of the individuals coming in,
Speaker 1: what would actually be based on these sort of affirmative
Speaker 1: action quotas. These are actually going to damage companies and
Speaker 1: they're going to damage production, They're going to damage goods,
Speaker 1: they're going to decrease the quality of everything in the West.
Speaker 1: And here's what I'm saying, that's by design. It's not
Speaker 1: just about socialism and getting people's money or taxes or whatever.
Speaker 1: There's a long term plan that Coleman is talking about,
Speaker 1: which is partly to de industrialize the West, break down
Speaker 1: America as a nation state, destroy its existing religious and
Speaker 1: cultural heritage, whatever's left of it. It's already largely been destroyed.
Speaker 1: I mean, what does it even mean to be an
Speaker 1: American anymore other than what we make money, what apple
Speaker 1: pie porn. I don't know what it means to be
Speaker 1: an American. The Founding documents don't matter to people who
Speaker 1: come from these foreign countries, especially Islamic countries, who have
Speaker 1: no concern for the Enlightenment values of the United States.
Speaker 1: It really just makes no sense sense unless that you understand. No,
Speaker 1: it makes perfect sense if there's a long term plan
Speaker 1: to destroy the West and to flip it over into
Speaker 1: a kind of socialist technocracy, and they can utilize, as HG.
Speaker 1: Well said, a kind of libertarianism to get there. In fact,
Speaker 1: ah she Well's in one of his books. I remember
Speaker 1: his open Conspiracy in nurbal Order. He says to his
Speaker 1: fellow Marxists. You Marxists are too short sighted. You think
Speaker 1: that the problem in your enemy is the free market capitalist.
Speaker 1: They're not your enemy. They're the ones that are going
Speaker 1: to build the infrastructure that we will take over. And
Speaker 1: when we take it over, we will create a technocratic
Speaker 1: control grid that won't be based on these Enlightenment libertarian ideas.
Speaker 1: So Coleman goes on to say that after they get
Speaker 1: this in place, when they have sufficiently de industrialized the West,
Speaker 1: then there will be a technocratic control grid that's created
Speaker 1: that's rolled out, a kind of a Skynet to control
Speaker 1: you when there's no jobs, there's no money. But we've
Speaker 1: got a UBI, a based sk income that's going to come.
Speaker 1: It's going to be your credits that roll out. That
Speaker 1: is essentially what's already been announced and proposed. They haven't
Speaker 1: actually done it, but you noticed, I mean, Zuckerberg was
Speaker 1: talking about a UBI a few years ago. So the
Speaker 1: very things that John Colman wrote in nineteen ninety two.
Speaker 1: This is way before Silicon Valley was even close to
Speaker 1: what it is today. I mean, it was big, but
Speaker 1: it wasn't like it is now. And he was telling
Speaker 1: you back then that they're going to try to roll
Speaker 1: out a technocratic universal based income, which is the form
Speaker 1: of socialism. And on top of that, the other ways
Speaker 1: that they would do this to the industrialize would be
Speaker 1: to export all of the industry to countries where there's
Speaker 1: an available pool of slave labor. On top of that,
Speaker 1: he says, and he mentions the Global two thousand report
Speaker 1: of Kissinger. He talks about the legalization of all forms
Speaker 1: of vice and degeneracy to further demoralize the West. This
Speaker 1: demoralization is not accident, it's by design, and it was
Speaker 1: part of the cultural warfare that entities like Tavistock had
Speaker 1: been studying since World War One and even prior to that,
Speaker 1: with the lead up to World War one through Wellington House.
Speaker 1: So they had mastered the techniques of propaganda, including culture war,
Speaker 1: and that's why they enlisted people like the Frankfurt School
Speaker 1: who had engaged in culture war as well. This is
Speaker 1: the et cetera. At the Tampa Bay Screams event. The
Speaker 1: tickets are at the top of my Twitter and you
Speaker 1: can get access over there by clicking through to the checkout.
Speaker 1: Now we were talking about these reports, these different discussions
Speaker 1: amongst the Kissinger era of the government. Christ working really
Speaker 1: as the sort of the liaison of the Rockefellers too
Speaker 1: set up the plans for depopulation. And I wanted to mention,
Speaker 1: as I've been pointing out quite a bit the last week,
Speaker 1: the rollout of the UFO nonsense is really ramped up
Speaker 1: intensely in the last few weeks, and I think that
Speaker 1: that plays into this perfectly, because although I don't think
Speaker 1: doctor Coleman mentions UFOs, what he does mention quite a
Speaker 1: bit in the book is the creation of a new mythos,
Speaker 1: of a new ideology for the West to believe in.
Speaker 1: But that mythos and that ideology has to really be
Speaker 1: amenable to and really sort of push people into the
Speaker 1: idea of a technocratic control by a global government. And
Speaker 1: so if the religion doesn't do that, it's really useless.
Speaker 1: But if you look at the whole history of the
Speaker 1: alien mythos of Roswell Area fifty one, you know the
Speaker 1: Betty and Barney Hill case, Georgia Dampsky, Alan Dulls as
Speaker 1: the head of CAA really protecting a dampskyin furthering that narrative.
Speaker 1: If you watch documentaries like Mirage Men, you'll see people
Speaker 1: like Richard dody Are interviewed, who has a counter intelligence operative,
Speaker 1: discusses at length how he was able to pick out
Speaker 1: people to be disseminators of disinformation on the whole alien mythos,
Speaker 1: and he points out that they were literally filming fake
Speaker 1: videos and telling these people who were then in various
Speaker 1: decades Paul Benowitz, mister Bob Moore, I think, is the
Speaker 1: next guy to really push out all this nonsense about
Speaker 1: reverse engineered alien technology and that the government was keeping
Speaker 1: this as a secret. Well, now the government has come
Speaker 1: out the last couple of years and say, okay, yes
Speaker 1: we found hidden alien tech. And you know, now Tom
Speaker 1: DeLong from Blink one eighty two is going to tell
Speaker 1: you the truth. And we've got generals who've talked to him.
Speaker 1: Trust us, it's all cool, which is all obviously a
Speaker 1: bunch of psychological operation nonsense. It's obviously fraudulent. There's not
Speaker 1: any explicitly clear evidence of extra terrestrial biological entities. There
Speaker 1: might be unexplained phenomena, but that doesn't tell us that
Speaker 1: it's aliens or that we were seated here via pan spur,
Speaker 1: which is a favorite myth of the global elite. Going
Speaker 1: back to even Isaac Newton believed in panspermia all the
Speaker 1: way up to Watson and Crik many others have talked
Speaker 1: about the possibility, oh, we were actually put here by
Speaker 1: aliens to be farmed, and again, all of that is
Speaker 1: just really nonsensical when you dig into it. You don't
Speaker 1: have to dig very far at all. And even the
Speaker 1: famous cases are all debunked as hoax stories borrowed from
Speaker 1: science fiction of abductions. So why is this why is
Speaker 1: this such a powerful narrative? Well, as we pointed out
Speaker 1: last week, in the nineteen sixties Brooking Report, they said
Speaker 1: that Institute report, they said that they would be able
Speaker 1: to destroy Western civilization's mythos if they were to announce
Speaker 1: alien life. And so when Reagan says in the United
Speaker 1: Nations back in the eighties that he's often concerned about
Speaker 1: how an external space threat would unite all the nations
Speaker 1: together and that they could put aside their differences of
Speaker 1: the Cold War, he might have been actually telling us
Speaker 1: where they wanted them to go with this idea of
Speaker 1: a fake narrative of it doesn't have to be an invasion,
Speaker 1: it can just be, you know, the announcement of alien life,
Speaker 1: as the Brooking sensitive report says, to shake everyone's belief
Speaker 1: in the incarnation of Christ or whatever, to introduce a
Speaker 1: new kind of religion. Maybe that's the true religion that
Speaker 1: you know the pope, because the Pope has even talked
Speaker 1: about alien life, so maybe he'll come out and support
Speaker 1: this announcement. And oh, yes, we need to support our
Speaker 1: space brothers. And that's what all the religions were really
Speaker 1: pointing to when they were talking about the you know,
Speaker 1: belief in God or the angels or whatever. They're really
Speaker 1: just aliens. This fits perfectly with the new religious ethos
Speaker 1: that Coleman talks about they want to introduce. And again
Speaker 1: this is all stuff, I mean, the religious I don't
Speaker 1: know if the religious stuff is in there. But the
Speaker 1: Global two thousand report that we read about people like
Speaker 1: Cyrus Vance, people like Henry Kissinger, they were talking about
Speaker 1: how to up in the West to make it more
Speaker 1: amenable to where they want to go. And you can
Speaker 1: look at places like Europe where NATO and other entities
Speaker 1: basically ran the same types of operations in Europe to
Speaker 1: put Europe into and the European Union. And it was
Speaker 1: actually the os S and CIA that literally created the
Speaker 1: European Union that's on record in the Eowan Ratu book.
Speaker 1: Was not Hitler that created it. Hitler had his own
Speaker 1: plan for it, but that's not what succeeded. What succeeded
Speaker 1: was the European Project and the European Steel and Coal
Speaker 1: Community Project. Those all were the beginnings of the European Union.
Speaker 1: But it took a lot of psychological operations. That took
Speaker 1: re education literally re education camps in Germany to re
Speaker 1: educate the Germans. That's what the OSS and the CIA
Speaker 1: set up. So you always think, oh, the Communists, the
Speaker 1: Soviets set up re education camps. Well the OSS did
Speaker 1: it too. The CIA set up re education camps in
Speaker 1: Germany to get Germans to not be interested in engineering, absolutely,
Speaker 1: because Germans are some of the best engineers on the planet.
Speaker 1: Why would they do that because they didn't want Germany
Speaker 1: rebuilding and rearming. They wanted Germany to be agrarian and
Speaker 1: I guess now into you know, weird sprockets, sex stuff.
Speaker 1: I don't know what Germans are supposed to be into.
Speaker 1: But that was all run by Uncle Sam Right to
Speaker 1: essentially re engineer and retool a German state into something
Speaker 1: whatever they have now, which is basically something Islamic, and
Speaker 1: you can look at Europe and how they did that
Speaker 1: with Europe over the last several decades as a test
Speaker 1: case as an example of what they want to do
Speaker 1: to America as well. It's a little bit more difficult
Speaker 1: because America's vast, it's sort of spread out, it's a
Speaker 1: lot of different states. Really, America's a bunch of different countries.
Speaker 1: You know, the South, there's little to no resemblance to
Speaker 1: you know, California or something like that, so they're vastly different.
Speaker 1: So it's a little more challenging to make all of
Speaker 1: America into some sort of European Unions socialist hell hole.
Speaker 1: But they can do it through longer phases and stages
Speaker 1: of propaganda. Drugs. Flooding the country with drugs is a
Speaker 1: big part of this operation. Again. John Coleman said that
Speaker 1: they would flood the country not just with you know,
Speaker 1: back in the nineteen eighties and nineties, like cocaine or whatever,
Speaker 1: but really crazy stuff like the fentanyl, which we've seen.
Speaker 1: And this is because in the plans of the Club
Speaker 1: of Rome they had discussed the fact that there's at
Speaker 1: least three billion what they call useless eaters, and so
Speaker 1: the Global two thousand Report under Carter via Kissinger had
Speaker 1: stated that there would have to be a massive reduction
Speaker 1: of the population of the United States. This is back
Speaker 1: in the nineteen seventies to around one hundred million. That
Speaker 1: was their projected plan back in the days of Kissinger
Speaker 1: and Carter in Cyrus Fance, was to get the US
Speaker 1: down to one hundred million by the year twenty to fifty.
Speaker 1: So notice that they had planned out many many decades
Speaker 1: in the Global two thousand documents and others around that time.
Speaker 1: There's also the nineteen ninety what is it ninety one
Speaker 1: ninety two Rio meetings that Bush and Maury Strong were at.
Speaker 1: They were discussing the same types of things of transitioning
Speaker 1: the American economy over into de industrialized service economy. This
Speaker 1: is all by design. That's the key thing is here
Speaker 1: that people think that this is all just happening organically
Speaker 1: and they don't think about long term fifty seventy five
Speaker 1: year plans. But the Global two thousand Report that was
Speaker 1: accepted and approved by Carter officially as US doctrine under
Speaker 1: the Secretary of State of the State Department, this became
Speaker 1: a plan to actually change America. It's not everyone knows about.
Speaker 1: Oh well, Kissinger did a State Department Memorandum two hundred
Speaker 1: which was about the depopular of the Third World. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they also talked about America. And so this is why
Speaker 1: right around the same time, actually a couple of years
Speaker 1: prior to this, you had the adoption of all of
Speaker 1: America's planned parenthoods had adopted the Barrelson Memo, which was
Speaker 1: a Rockefeller population report on pushing the gay lifestyle, pushing
Speaker 1: all alternative forms of living, open marriages, open whatever. That
Speaker 1: was all pushed in the Barrelson Memo, admittedly to help
Speaker 1: change America into a socialist country. Actually says that more
Speaker 1: they would have more taxes, there would be more socialism
Speaker 1: if they were able to get more and more people
Speaker 1: to not have families and to live in these sort
Speaker 1: of alternative lifestyles. At the same time, the Stamford Research
Speaker 1: Institute was putting out papers on alternative lifestyles, pushing alternative living.
Speaker 1: People like Alvin Toffler even talked about how they would
Speaker 1: attach alternative sexual lifestyles too. Other alternative movements like anarchism,
Speaker 1: vegetarianism nowadays veganism, communal living, intentional communities. All these kinds
Speaker 1: of experimental lifestyles were pushed and promoted after the nineteen
Speaker 1: sixties kundricultural Revolution by design in the white papers. So
Speaker 1: it's not organic, it's not random. Right, You've got boomers
Speaker 1: at the Esseline Institute saying that they want to have
Speaker 1: sex with angels and aliens. Literally, in nineteen seventies they
Speaker 1: wanted to figure out how in rituals to have sex
Speaker 1: with alien angels. I'm not joking. That's in the official
Speaker 1: history of the Eslin Institute. So like, this sounds crazy
Speaker 1: to you, but this is all in the documents when
Speaker 1: you actually read these documents, that that's their actual plan.
Speaker 1: So that's why they pushed so hard the legalization of
Speaker 1: all forms of crazy drugs, which will eventually happen. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think there's a positive use for certain drugs. I'm
Speaker 1: not trying to say that, you know, I'm not some
Speaker 1: like puritan teetotaler here, But the point is that it's
Speaker 1: released on the public as a form of social engineering
Speaker 1: and weaponry. It's a weapon, and the packing people into
Speaker 1: massive megacities was a big part of this. In fact,
Speaker 1: the Club of Romance studied this and according to doctor Coleman,
Speaker 1: and that people were much more easy to control and
Speaker 1: manage if they were sort of packed into these megacities.
Speaker 1: And suppression of all scientific development except for that which
Speaker 1: is deemed beneficial by the committee. So this means that
Speaker 1: there's actual, real advances that are made in medicine and technology,
Speaker 1: but they're actually suppressed because they don't want that out
Speaker 1: for the public. They want that only for certain select
Speaker 1: members of the elite, and they intentionally want to give
Speaker 1: us subpar or even damaging dysgenics based products and technologies. Next,
Speaker 1: they would cause limited wars in certain regions and through
Speaker 1: certain advanced countries to create starvation and disease in Third
Speaker 1: world countries that would help meet the Third World goals
Speaker 1: of reducing the population by three billion. Now this does
Speaker 1: fit into Kissinger's State Department Member aut A two hundred
Speaker 1: and the Global two thousand report, because if you think
Speaker 1: about COVID, you know, Alex often talks about how how
Speaker 1: many vast numbers of people died in the Third World
Speaker 1: as a result of the COVID measures because the supply
Speaker 1: chains were interrupted and so you had really necessary uh,
Speaker 1: you know, fertilizers and other things grain that didn't reach
Speaker 1: the Third World, and you have had you have you
Speaker 1: even had people from the establishment during the COVID nonsense
Speaker 1: writing that, well, this is actually good because it helped
Speaker 1: the planet shut down and it helped the planet depopulate
Speaker 1: because humans are hurting the planet, so that that's literally
Speaker 1: vindicated during the whole COVID nonsense. Next, he says that, uh,
Speaker 1: there would need to be all forms of demoralization released
Speaker 1: in the United States to weaken the moral fiber of
Speaker 1: the nation and to demoralize American workers and the working
Speaker 1: class by number one mass unemployment, but at the same
Speaker 1: time importing masses of foreign workers. This was be done
Speaker 1: at a top down, elite corporate level, and thus the
Speaker 1: jobs would dwindle in the West by design, as the
Speaker 1: Club of Rome helped to push zero growth policies in
Speaker 1: the West, while none of those policies or those strictures
Speaker 1: are mandated for the East, for Asia, for China, for
Speaker 1: your Asia or whatever. So there's an intentional allowing and
Speaker 1: pushing and promoting of the building up of rival countries.
Speaker 1: So no, China at this level is not an enemy.
Speaker 1: They worked hand in hand with the globally to be
Speaker 1: built up, but rather this would have the effect of
Speaker 1: through toxic culture, and eventually he doesn't even mention. He
Speaker 1: mentions a lot of deviant sexuality, but he doesn't mention.
Speaker 1: Even John Coleman would have been surprised at the transagenda
Speaker 1: how widely promoted. That is, the youth of the land
Speaker 1: would be encouraged by means of degenerate music and toxiculture
Speaker 1: and drugs to rebel. Thus they would eventually not be
Speaker 1: able to pair, bond and create families. This was all
Speaker 1: part of the Tavistock Institute's plans, who prepared their studies
Speaker 1: and their research for the global elites and the oligarchs
Speaker 1: to push this in America. Tavistock, for example, direct to
Speaker 1: Stanford Research to undertake the works of Willis Harmon. I've
Speaker 1: quoted inside of Willis Harmon many many times on my channel.
Speaker 1: You can notice right here Coleman is arguing that this
Speaker 1: book The Aquarium Conspiracy, which is not a conspiracy book.
Speaker 1: It's actually a book about how the entire Western world
Speaker 1: needs to be essentially inverted, that women need to be
Speaker 1: running everything, women need to be CEOs. We've listened too long,
Speaker 1: too masculine patriarchal systems. It's time to invert and reverse
Speaker 1: all systems so that women run everything literally and we
Speaker 1: have more and more essentially socialism. He argues that book
Speaker 1: wasn't actually written by Marilyn Ferguson, but was in fact
Speaker 1: put out by Stamford Research and was largely written by
Speaker 1: Willis Harmon aka Changing Images of Man and so forth.
Speaker 1: To keep people everywhere from deciding their own destinies. There
Speaker 1: would be many, many managed crises, so entities would be
Speaker 1: set up to stack layers and layers of governmental control
Speaker 1: which are ultimately controlled not even by the government or
Speaker 1: the elected officials, but by the deep state. So you
Speaker 1: would have entities like FEMA being set up that would
Speaker 1: have would have regional control. And it's just more and
Speaker 1: more management of crises. And the crises may be real,
Speaker 1: or they might just be capitalized upon if they're fake
Speaker 1: or whatever. But the point is that you use the crises.
Speaker 1: Never let a good crisis go away, s as ram
Speaker 1: Emanuel says, you steer it into what your goal is,
Speaker 1: or if your goal is more taxation, use the crisis.
Speaker 1: Oh our you know entity, our government of control system
Speaker 1: is underfunded nine to eleven. It wouldn't have happened if
Speaker 1: we'd had billions dollars more funding. So you see, the
Speaker 1: crises lead to more funding, more taxation, and more problems.
Speaker 1: And as I said with the alien stuff, the introdution
Speaker 1: of the introduction of more and more cults and new religions.
Speaker 1: These cults and new religions are actually key means by
Speaker 1: which alternative lifestyles can be promoted. And it's not just
Speaker 1: weird wacky stuff, you know, scientology or that kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: It's also Hindu, it's also new Age. It's also foreign
Speaker 1: religious traditions Islam mass imported as well to the West.
Speaker 1: And also the recent heresy of dispensationalism, which is all
Speaker 1: based on a recent invention that the nation state of
Speaker 1: Israel is actually the church and that's actually where everybody's
Speaker 1: focus should be, and the raptures coming and the Antichrist
Speaker 1: is coming all, which is a bunch of nonsense. In
Speaker 1: terms of historic Christianity, none of them that was true
Speaker 1: in any Christian group two hundred years ago, but that
Speaker 1: was actually a recently created idea or geopolitical ends. As
Speaker 1: well as other things. He talks about liberation, theology, Muslim brotherhood,
Speaker 1: so you would basically have this importation into the West
Speaker 1: of all kinds of crazy ideas, everything from on the
Speaker 1: one hand, radical Islam Salafi groups. As you know, I've
Speaker 1: debated all these top Muslims over the last five or
Speaker 1: six years. They're all public debates. I think they're the
Speaker 1: only one I haven't debated is Muhammed a jab and
Speaker 1: he says I'm not popular enough for him to debate.
Speaker 1: Now that's an excuse. But the other ones that I've debated,
Speaker 1: you'll notice, they're all basically Salafi. So they're all basically
Speaker 1: the most extreme branch of Islam. So why are the
Speaker 1: most vocal ones the ones that are the most extreme. Well,
Speaker 1: I think this is by design. I think there are
Speaker 1: entities that are pushing this in the West. Even the
Speaker 1: Tates have adopted Islam, or at least Andrew has adopted
Speaker 1: Islam and pushed it heavily in the West because I
Speaker 1: don't know why, maybe because he met with Saudi's, who knows,
Speaker 1: but he's pushed that because it's part of an overall
Speaker 1: agenda to push foreign religious commitments onto the West. Because
Speaker 1: they think that they've gained an upper hand in terms
Speaker 1: of the weakness of Christianity, and absolutely Christianity is weak.
Speaker 1: I don't think most forms of Christianity are really even
Speaker 1: could even be called Christianity. They're so bad with you know,
Speaker 1: like trans bishops and I mean Episcopal Methodists, like all
Speaker 1: that stuff is just like gone. So the people who
Speaker 1: at least believe in trying to adhere to Christian teaching,
Speaker 1: they're also still weakened by a bunch of weird heresies
Speaker 1: like the rapture and all kinds of nonsense like that dispensationalism.
Speaker 1: So that's put the West in an extremely terrible situation
Speaker 1: with the system, the government, and the corporate elite actually
Speaker 1: pushing and promoting all forms of weird, fringe foreign religious groups,
Speaker 1: cults and movements. And then doctor Coleman goes on to
Speaker 1: say that you'll expect more and more of this because
Speaker 1: religious liberation and liberation theology is really a covert form
Speaker 1: of socialism. But it's not Marxists and KGB people in
Speaker 1: Moscow pushing it. It's actually pushed by Western elites. You see.
Speaker 1: In fact, the Rockefellers put out a report many many
Speaker 1: years ago. It's you could still find this on Academia
Speaker 1: dot edu where they said that you might think that
Speaker 1: they would be against liberation theology back in the seventies
Speaker 1: and eighties, but actually they Nelson Rockfeller said he supported
Speaker 1: it because liberation theology allowed Christians to finally accept birth control,
Speaker 1: abortion and population control. So there's absolutely nothing that the
Speaker 1: Rockefeller Foundation saw as problematic with liberation theology. In fact,
Speaker 1: they loved it. Coleman says that expect in the next
Speaker 1: coming decades massive amounts of terror, global terror. So here
Speaker 1: we are in nineteen ninety two, wrote this a year
Speaker 1: before what the World Trade Center attack that was fostered
Speaker 1: by a false flag event with Ahmad Salam who recorded
Speaker 1: being entrapped into that event. That was I think supposed
Speaker 1: to be what nine to eleven would end up being.
Speaker 1: So in nineteen ninety two he was warning about nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety three and two thousand and one and that we
Speaker 1: would see an outbreak of the global war on terror,
Speaker 1: which was intended intentionally to push the narrative of Islam
Speaker 1: versus the Christian West, which, of course the Christian West
Speaker 1: here really beared no resemblance to the medieval Christianity of
Speaker 1: Orthodox Christianity and the Roman Catholic world going to war
Speaker 1: against Muslim countries or Muslim leaders, or Saladin to retake Jerusalem.
Speaker 1: But it was all recast as a kind of clash
Speaker 1: of civilizations, narrative on purpose, which the reason for these clashes,
Speaker 1: and from this mindset, and we saw this when we
Speaker 1: looked at Jaqatlee's book a few months ago, on the
Speaker 1: fourth Hour, his book about the New World Order. He's
Speaker 1: one of the Globe, He's the Kissinger of France. He
Speaker 1: actually says that the clashing together of all these things,
Speaker 1: whether it's capitalism versus communism or Islam versus Christianity, from
Speaker 1: the global leap perspective, they see no problem in this
Speaker 1: because this produces the necessary synthesis. They actually believe that
Speaker 1: this is necessary. You have to cause these things to
Speaker 1: smash together, and then you sort of prepare for and
Speaker 1: steer the synthesis that you wanted to begin with. And
Speaker 1: so the smashing together of East and West by design,
Speaker 1: the importation of Islam into the West by design, and
Speaker 1: getting Muslims and Christians to battle each other. And by
Speaker 1: the way, I'm not pro Islam at all. I'm very
Speaker 1: anti Islam, but I also recognize the higher level structure
Speaker 1: and status of the elites who intentionally bring these things
Speaker 1: into conflict, and that's done by intities like the IMF,
Speaker 1: the World Bank, the Royal Society, that's who does this,
Speaker 1: and they do it by design, and they do it
Speaker 1: on purpose to control an engineer and steer the synthesis.
Speaker 1: As a result, for example, the worldwide Terror Apparatus that
Speaker 1: was set up right around this time that would become,
Speaker 1: you know, the Global War on Terror, al Qaeda and
Speaker 1: so forth, isis you know, all these things that was
Speaker 1: modeled on the structures of Gladio, all the terrosall networks
Speaker 1: that happened through Gladio literally just transferred into the same
Speaker 1: people training the Moujahaden to become al Qaeda and to
Speaker 1: become the so called terror networks throughout the world. So
Speaker 1: the CIA later on Masaude as well, were involved in
Speaker 1: helping to train a lot of these groups CIA, especially
Speaker 1: in Gladio, to be the so called terror armies that
Speaker 1: would go around under the banner of I mean, I'm
Speaker 1: not saying under the banner falsely. They really are Muslims.
Speaker 1: They really do have a lot of these Solafi beliefs
Speaker 1: and so forth. So that's by design and the ultimate goal.
Speaker 1: He says, is to establish this synthesis where because of terror,
Speaker 1: because of the threat that terror poses, you would have
Speaker 1: this total tracking and tracing and control as a result.
Speaker 1: And certainly that's what nine to eleven produced. And I
Speaker 1: don't think we're done with terror. We just saw, you know,
Speaker 1: terror supposedly in Germany recently, so that's not going away.
Speaker 1: It's still very a powerful tool. And again it goes
Speaker 1: back to Laddio, especially the recent Germany events, very much
Speaker 1: like a gladiotype of event where it demonizes the right.
Speaker 1: In the case of Gladio, it demonized the left, but
Speaker 1: the same tactic can be used. Lastly, he says to
Speaker 1: take control of education in America with the intent of
Speaker 1: completely destroying it and turning it into a socialist enterprise.
Speaker 1: So that's his Committee three hundred book. And he also
Speaker 1: has a great book called a One World Order under
Speaker 1: a Socialist Dictatorship, and I recommend those if you haven't
Speaker 1: read them, they're good reads, as well as this Tavistock book.
Speaker 1: And you can get my books over at Jason Alsis
Speaker 1: dot com. If you're interested in my breakdowns of all
Speaker 1: this stuff through movies and symbolism, you can get us
Speaker 1: Start Hollywood one and two. Sign copies in the shop
Speaker 1: at jaysonallsis dot com. Also go to the INFL