Speaker 1: All right, let's start with this scenario. Imagine you step
outside tonight, you look up and the sky is.
Speaker 2: Well, it's just different, not just different like gone. Yeah,
familiar stars are gone.
Speaker 1: Exactly, and in their place you see this, this spectacle
that spans the entire globe.
Speaker 2: And we're not talking about a little flashing light, you know,
a single UFO streaking across the atmosphere. This is something
else entirely, No, not at all.
Speaker 1: We're talking about every major religious figure you can possibly
think of, Jesus, Buddha, Muhammad.
Speaker 2: Krishna, all of them appearing at once, projected in the
sky over their prospective holy sites.
Speaker 1: And here's the really chilling part. They're speaking to you
directly into your mind and your own native language.
Speaker 2: And that, astonishingly, is only the setup. That's just the
beginning of the.
Speaker 1: Show, right, Because this massive, meticulally engineered psychological operation culminates
in the ultimate plot twist.
Speaker 2: All of those globally recognized figures, these symbols of hope
and faith for billions, they seamlessly merge, They become one single, unified.
Speaker 1: Entity, and this new Messiah figure then announces that all
the previous scriptures were misunderstood, they were misinterpreted, or maybe
just preparation for this exact.
Speaker 2: Moment, proclaiming a radical, new and utterly inescapable new world order.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's impact this. This is the terrifying and comprehensive
core premise of a theory known as Project Bluebeam.
Speaker 2: A decade's old conspiracy theory, but its power has not
faded one bit, not at all.
Speaker 1: It claims that NASA, working hand in g love with
the United Nations, is actively developing the technology to stage this,
this massive technologically simulated second Coming.
Speaker 2: And they fake alien invasions at the same time, just
for good measure.
Speaker 1: Right. The goal to shatter all existing traditional religions, induce
a mass psychological collapse on a global scale, and then
establish a global dictatorship under a single, unified figure, the Antichrist.
Speaker 2: It is so ambitious, it's terrifying, and it's deeply deeply
rooted in some of the most paranoid strains of apocalyptic
thinking you can find.
Speaker 1: And to conduct this deep dive, we've gathered sources that
let us go beyond just you know, reciting the theory.
We want to get into a rigorous analysis of why
it works so well. As a narrative.
Speaker 2: We have the foundational blueprint, the original document detailing the
four steps of the conspiracy, published by its originator, the
Canadian journalist surge Monist, way back in nineteen ninety four.
Speaker 1: So that gives us the technical claims, the chilling scope
of the new World Order agenda he laid.
Speaker 2: Out, and we're pairing that specific framework with analysis of
its incredible, enduring modern cultural impact.
Speaker 1: Which we see every single time there's uncertainty, right particularly
when governments start talking about UFOs, or when there are
these highly visible mysterious phenomena.
Speaker 2: Like that recent swarm of strange drones that were lighting
up the entire US East coast. That's a perfect trigger.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. We also have crucial analytical contexts, a deep dive
into the psychology of why detailed prophecies, even ones that fail,
still persist, and maybe most importantly, a detailed analysis of
real world information warfare and influence tactics.
Speaker 2: So our mission for you, the listener, is to really
examine this complex, decades old narrative, to understand the chilling
step by step mechanisms it proposes.
Speaker 1: And then connect those seemingly outlandish claims to established, documented
concepts of modern psychological operations.
Speaker 2: We're giving you the shortcut not just to know what
Project bleue Beam is, but to understand why this narrative
persists and what fundamental human fears it so ruthlessly exploits.
Speaker 1: To really grasp the magnitude of Project Bluebeam, we have
to start at the beginning. We have to start with
the man who claimed to reveal this entire sinister blueprint.
Speaker 2: Serge Monist Right Monas was a Canadian journalist and a
conspiracy theorist who in nineteen ninety four published the document
he called Project Bluebeam NASA, and.
Speaker 1: He didn't present himself as a theorist. He positioned them
as a whistleblower exactly.
Speaker 2: He claimed that NASA, with the help and the massive
resources of the United Nations, was using this project to
implement a new Age religion.
Speaker 1: Under the Antichrist, with the goal of establishing a global
secular dictatorship, the thing he and many others called the
New World Order or nWo.
Speaker 2: What's really crush to understand about monast though, is that
he wasn't just you know, making this up in a vacuum.
He was clearly influenced by a long, long lineage of
conspiracy theory stretching back decades.
Speaker 1: He drew heavily on earlier theorists, people like William Guy Carr.
Speaker 2: Yep. Carr was famous for pushing these narratives about secret cabals,
you know, the Illuminati, international bankers, all attempting to achieve
global domination. It's a very old story.
Speaker 1: And this influence is more than just thematic, right, it's structural.
Speaker 2: It absolutely is. Manus's later work, which was even more detailed,
he titled it Les Protocols, the Toronto six point six
point six, and that was modeled directly on one of
the most infamous, consequential, and frankly toxic forgeries in history.
Speaker 1: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the.
Speaker 2: Very One, an anti Semitic text first published in Russia
at the turn of the twentieth century that purported to
detail a Jewish plan for global domination.
Speaker 1: That connection is, it's profound, and it's deeply disturbing. By
deliberately patterning his work on the Protocols, Manas wasn't just
presenting a modern technological prediction.
Speaker 2: No, he was grounding his narrative in a pre existing,
deeply paranoid and historically dangerous framework, this idea of secret
global elites manipulating society from the shadows.
Speaker 1: It immediately places his claims within a context of existential
ideological warfare. This isn't about technology, It's about good versus evil.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. It reveals that the goal isn't technological disclosure. The
goal is ideological transportation. It's to convince you that a
shadowy cabal is trying to steal your control in your soul.
Speaker 1: And, as often happens with figures who claim to expose
these comprehensive truths, his own death quickly became part of
the conspiracy's mythology. Right.
Speaker 2: He died in nineteen ninety six. He was only fifty one.
The official cause of death was a heart attack.
Speaker 1: But his followers, as you'd expect, immediately dismiss that. They
claimed he was silenced.
Speaker 2: Or even deliberately killed for exposing the truth about Bluebeam
and the nWo agenda. It's a classic move, this immediate martyrdom.
It reinforces the very notion that the conspiracy is real.
Speaker 1: That the stakes are life and death, and that every
single aspect of the official narrative is a lie.
Speaker 2: And if we look at the ultimate comprehensive goal that
monis laid out. It's not just a political shift. It's
not just about a new government.
Speaker 1: No, it's a total societal, political, and spiritual demolition and reset.
Speaker 2: The objective is to establish a global mind controlled dictatorship
to abolish traditional religions. He specifically targeted the global reach
of Christian and Muslim doctrines.
Speaker 1: To eliminate national identity, national pride, dismantle the traditional family unit.
Speaker 2: And ultimately to create a population so desperate, so broken,
that they willingly accept a new unified world religion under Lucifer.
Speaker 1: It's a template for total behavioral and cognitive control. It
leaves no safe harbor for individual thought or any kind
of traditional allegiance.
Speaker 2: So that's the ultimate goal. Now, let's walk through the
four proposed steps Manas claim would lead to this catastrophe.
Speaker 1: Step one is where they start laying the foundational psychological groundwork.
It's about undermining faith itself.
Speaker 2: He called step one the breaking down of archaeological knowledge, which.
Speaker 1: Sounds kind of academic, maybe even a little boring.
Speaker 2: It sounds academic, but the goal is pure psychological warfare.
It's a global ideological shock and awe campaign aimed at
discrediting the historical and spiritual foundations of the world's major faiths.
Speaker 1: And how do they do that?
Speaker 2: The theory claims the conspirators will use technology to fake
supernatural events and strategically trigger fake earthquakes at precise, highly
symbolic locations around the planet.
Speaker 1: Why the earthquakes, What's the point of that?
Speaker 2: The point is to create an opportunity in the rubble
of these manufactured disasters. They will introduce new, supposedly scientifically
verifiable discoveries.
Speaker 1: Ah new artifacts.
Speaker 2: Exactly artifacts that contradict foundational religious beliefs. These new discoveries
would supposedly prove to the global population out of the
guise of scientific fact, that all fundamental religious doctrines are
based on error.
Speaker 1: So imagine a discovery near Versalem or Mecca or the
Ganges that scientifically, quote unquote proves the core tenets of
that region's faith are just wrong.
Speaker 2: The audacity of that is genuinely incredible, isn't it. You're
not just trying to disprove faith through rational debate.
Speaker 1: No, You're using the very earth beneath people's feet, weaponized technology,
and fabricated scientific evidence to deliver a manufactured global archaeological disproof.
Speaker 2: It's an ideological trojan horse.
Speaker 1: If we connect this to the broader picture of societal control.
This first step is absolutely crucial. It targets the very
ideological foundations of civilization.
Speaker 2: It's designed to create a kind of global spiritual and
historical homelessness. It instantly undermines the legitimacy of existing spiritual
and moral.
Speaker 1: Structures, and by making the masses skeptical in a drift,
they become intensely receptive to the next stage, the.
Speaker 2: Next much grander and supposedly more comforting spectacle, the replacement religion.
Speaker 1: Which naturally brings us to the most famous, most outlandish,
and most spectacular part of the entire theory.
Speaker 2: Step two, the gigantic space show, the era of holographic gods.
Speaker 1: This step claims that mass three dimensional holographic laser projections
will be beamed across the entire planet simultaneously.
Speaker 2: Manus asserts that it turns the night sky into a
massive three hundred and sixty degree movie screen. It uses
the atmosphere itself as the projection medium, and Monust.
Speaker 1: Was weirdly specific about the mechanics of this, which is
a key trait of these complex conspiracy theories. They use
jargon to sound authoritative, right.
Speaker 2: He claimed. The projections would be cast on to the
sodium layer, which is located approximately sixty miles.
Speaker 1: Up in the atmosphere, and the technological coordination required for this,
he asserted, was already well within the reach of NASA
and the UN even back in the early nineties.
Speaker 2: The specificity of the sodium layer is really interesting. That
layer also known as the sodium guide star layer. It's
a real thing. It's high enough to be seen globally.
Speaker 1: And astronomers actually use it, don't They to create artificial
guide stars for adaptive optics telescopes.
Speaker 2: They do so by including this real scientific detail. Manus
lends this veneer of genuine, high level technological capability to
his entirely fictitious plot. It makes it sound more credible.
Speaker 1: And the content of the show itself is tailored for
maximum psychological impact.
Speaker 2: The projection would feature the predominant local deity, So whether
it's Jesus in the Christian world, Mohammad or the image
of the Mahdi in Muslim regions, Buddha in Asia, or
Krishna in India.
Speaker 1: It appears in the sky specifically tailored to the region
and speaking in all the local languages and dialects of
that era.
Speaker 2: This instant, region specific customization is designed to eliminate skepticism.
It's built on trust. You see the figure you trust
the most, speaking your specific language, and that reinforces that
this moment is meant just for you and your community.
Speaker 1: Well, wait a minute. If the ultimate goal is to
abolish all traditional religions and install the Antichrist, why would
you start by projecting the world's most holy and beloved figures.
Speaker 2: That's an excellent question.
Speaker 1: Wouldn't that instantly create suspicion among the faithful? Isn't that
a massive risk to the whole operation.
Speaker 2: It seems like a risk, But the answer lies in
maximizing cognitive shock. If they just immediately projected the Antichrist,
billions of people would instantly reject it. They'd call it
a false prophet, a hoax, a demon.
Speaker 1: Okay, that makes sense.
Speaker 2: But if they begin by projecting your God, trust is
established immediately, the psychological wall just comes crashing down. People
stop questioning the technology and they start questioning their own
understanding of faith.
Speaker 1: H So the familiar provides the necessary psychological bridge, and
then comes the terrifying climax, the ultimate betrayal of that trust.
Speaker 2: Correct Manus claims all the projecting gods will merge in
this terrifying visual display of unity into a single unified figure,
the Antichrist, the new Messiah, and.
Speaker 1: This figure will then deliver a sermon, a new gospel.
Speaker 2: The message is simple. The various scriptures were misunderstood and misinterpreted.
The old religions are responsible for centuries of war and conflict,
and therefore they must be abolished to make way for
the new world order.
Speaker 1: Religion centered on the one true God, which is the
Antichrist they see right there before them.
Speaker 2: And for a touch of almost I don't know, sacrilegious
dramatic irony, the introduction to this new age, one world
religion is supposedly planned to be accompanied by Beethoven's O
to Joy, the.
Speaker 1: Anthem of international unity used to usher in a global dictatorship.
It's incredibly cynical.
Speaker 2: The immediate predicted result of this total psychological betrayal is
mass disillusionment, chaos, and the unleashing of millions of what
Monus chillingly calls programmed religious fanatics through.
Speaker 1: What he describes as mass demonic possession.
Speaker 2: The goal is maximum paralyzing internal conflict and spiritual confusion
on a global scale, right before the New Order steps
in to restore peace through absolute force.
Speaker 1: The level of technical sophistication that Project Bluebeam claims is
just it's critical to its persuasive power.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, we're talking about coordinating simultaneous customized three dimensional images
beamed to the four corners of the planet, and Manus
asserted this would be done by computers and specialized software
that were already operational in the early nineteen nineties.
Speaker 2: The technical description it really tries to ground itself in
this blend of known complex physics and just pure speculation.
Speaker 1: He claimed. These realistic holographic images rely on nearly identical
acoustic and optical.
Speaker 2: Signals, specifically mentioning extreme low frequency ELF, very low frequency VLF,
and low frequency LF waves. The idea is that they
combined to produce a deep perspective image.
Speaker 1: This suggests the illusion would be entirely sensory. It would
fool not just your site, but your hearing and maybe
even tactile sensation.
Speaker 2: This detail about ELF, VLF and LF waves is fascinating
for a general audience. These aren't familiar frequencies like FM
radio or Wi Fi. Why did Manus choose those specifically.
Speaker 1: To cite, Well, he shows them because they have real
world and kind of sinister, highly specialized military applications. It
lends a pseudoscientific authority to the claim.
Speaker 2: ELF and VLF waves are known for their ability to
penetrate deep, underground and underwater. That's why they're used for
communicating with submarines.
Speaker 1: So by claiming the manipulation involves these low frequency waves,
Manus is subtly implying that the technology is already deep
in the hands of the military industrial complex, exactly that.
Speaker 2: The deception is already pervasive and inescapable, that it's capable
of penetrating concrete, deep wa and in this fantasy, the
human skull itself.
Speaker 1: And this transition marks the shift from an external spectacle
to an internal invasion, which is arguably the most terrifying
claim monist.
Speaker 2: Makes, which brings us to step three. Telepathic electronic two
way communication.
Speaker 1: The theory claims people will literally think their God is
speaking to them individually using those ELF radio waves projected
directly into their heads.
Speaker 2: This is the critical leak from visual propaganda to direct
psychic control. The goal is to make the deception feel personal, immediate,
and divinely mandated. Is essentially describing weaponized telepathy.
Speaker 1: But this is where the real world analysis of information
operations becomes so essential. We have to contrast Monust's claim
of satellite beamed psychic telepathy with what we know about
actual demonstrated information warfare capabilities today.
Speaker 2: Right our sources on modern information warfare, specifically from analysts
at centers like HCSS, the Hague Center for Strategic Studies,
they emphasize that real influencing efforts focus not on mind
control rays, at least not in the sci fi sense.
Speaker 1: They target the cognitive dimension. They use non kinetic information
driven capabilities.
Speaker 2: And what's truly fascinating is that even without the sci
fi telepathy, real influence campaigns achieve their effects by exploiting
established psychological vulnerabilities. They don't need a receiver chip in
your brain.
Speaker 1: No, they rely on things like emotional appeals, social contagion,
and appeal to authority. Those are far more efficient vectors
for control.
Speaker 2: Let's talk about the power of emotional appeal in this context.
Real world information operations leverage what's known as the negativity bias.
Speaker 1: The finding that negative emotions, especially anger, fear, and panic,
are processed automatically and much more effectively than positive or
rational messages.
Speaker 2: This is absolutely foundational to Blue Beams design. Negativity bias
isn't a modern phenomenon, It's rooted in our evolutionary past.
Our brains are hardwired to pay immediate attention to threats.
Speaker 1: Because historically, missing a three at a predator or a
toxic bariment.
Speaker 2: Death exactly positive information. What psychologists call system two thinking,
that slow rational thought, that's luxury. Blue beam is designed
to incite mass hysteria, fear, and religious fury.
Speaker 1: The wave of suicide, murder, and permanent psychological disorders that
Mamus mentions, you.
Speaker 2: Are exploiting system one, that automatic gut reaction thinking, and
that instantly reduces cognitive resistance and makes people immensely pliable,
desperate for anyone to impose order.
Speaker 1: And then there is cultivation theory, which speaks to the
long game of this deception.
Speaker 2: Right, the theory that repeated, consistent exposure to media, even
if the messages are false or contradictory, cultivates the belief
that those messages apply to the real world.
Speaker 1: This cultivation is essential for the nwo's success. If the
Blue Beams spectacle repeatedly asserts a new reality, that the
old gods were wrong, that the new merged deity is correct,
that constant, overwhelming, sensory driven exposure helps cement the altered
perceived reality.
Speaker 2: It shifts deep seated norms and values. It's the slow
erosion of belief systems through relentless, high impact messaging.
Speaker 1: It's a complete psychological dismantling. But Monus recognized that spectacle
and belief manipulation weren't enough on their own.
Speaker 2: Before any of this display could happen, he predicted a
necessary precondition for the entire project Bluebeam economic disaster and
total control over all resources.
Speaker 1: That's right, Manus claimed it would begin with a worldwide
economic disaster, not necessarily a total catastrophic crash, but enough
instability to force a mandatory transition away from physical currency.
Speaker 2: The plan required the introduction of an in between currency
before a full transition to electronic cash. This would force
people with savings to either spin them or turn in
all their physical cash.
Speaker 1: The logic behind this move is ruthlessly practical, isn't it,
and all.
Speaker 2: About financial control totally. If everyone is forced onto digital currency.
The new nWo Council has perfect visibility and control over
every single transaction.
Speaker 1: And critically, if everyone is financially vulnerable and dependent, no
one can quietly fund a revolution or an insurrection.
Speaker 2: The goal is to ensure a one hundred percent dependency
on the ruling Council, and.
Speaker 1: That dependency extends far beyond just currency. Monest envisioned an
ultimate surveillance state that preemptively eliminates any possibility of self sufficiency.
Speaker 2: He detailed plans for planting sensors and implanting microchips in
wild animals, birds, and even fish.
Speaker 1: Why the fish, I have to ask, It seems like
such an odd, almost comical detail in an otherwise terrifying plan.
Speaker 2: That detail, as bizarre as it sounds, is incredibly telling.
It reveals the nwo's vision for totalitarian efficiency. The chips
are there to track and trace anyone who resists the
new World order and tries to live independently by hunting
or fishing.
Speaker 1: So there's no escape.
Speaker 2: Zero Manus predicted that new laws would also be changed
in all nations to make everyone dependent on a single
centralized food and vitamin supply source, all controlled by the Council.
Speaker 1: So if you attempt to live off a grid, if
you try to hunt for your own food, the system
is designed to track you down via chipped wildlife, and.
Speaker 2: If you adhere to old beliefs, you are identified as
defective and targeted under new psychiatric disorder laws. It leaves
no gap for independent.
Speaker 1: Existence, and those deemed defective they.
Speaker 2: Would face immediate classification and transfer to eradication camps. They
would be used as living organ banks, subjects for medical experiments,
or relegated to slave labor camps.
Speaker 1: This underscores the true tyrannical nature of the claimed dictator show,
ruthless without exception and built on technology specifically designed to
track down and control people everywhere.
Speaker 2: A sharp contrast with older technologies that were designed to
improve life. This is about total control.
Speaker 1: Okay. So, once humanity is spiritually fractured, psychologically broken, and
economically dependent, the stage is set for the final brutal phase.
Speaker 2: We arrive at step four, the final chaos.
Speaker 1: This step, according to the Monus document, has three distinct
and over lapping parts, all designed to induce global madness
and total societal dissolution.
Speaker 2: The objective here is pure, unadulterated hysteria. The goal is
to push global populations to such an edge of psychological
exhaustion that they will be desperate for any strong hand to.
Speaker 1: Impose order, even if that hand belongs to the Antichrist
exactly so.
Speaker 2: Part four point one involves a fake alien invasion.
Speaker 1: Using the same holographic and atmospheric projection technology from step two.
The plan is to make humanity think an alien invasion
is imminent at every major city simultaneously.
Speaker 2: This engineered external threat provides the ultimate justification for the
creation of a new unified Global authority, a savior government,
the nWo, that steps in to protect Earth from the invaders.
Speaker 1: Part four point two then focuses specifically on targeted theological manipulation,
the false rapture.
Speaker 2: This stage involves using the simulated technological and supernatural forces
to specifically target Christian populations, making them believe the rapture,
the belief that the faithful will be bodily taken to
Heaven is about to happen.
Speaker 1: Creating mass panic and spiritual confusion.
Speaker 2: And Part four point three brings back the theme of
infiltration in a terrifying way. Manis called it technological possession.
Speaker 1: This claims that a mixture of electronic and supernatural forces
will travel through all existing communication infrastructure fiber optics, cox cables,
power grids, telephone lines to.
Speaker 2: Penetrate every single electronic device, which by then will all
have special microchips pre installed.
Speaker 1: And this total systemic penetration is claimed to lead to
the immediate psychological effect of projecting global satanic ghosts.
Speaker 2: Or artificial demons all around the world, specifically designed to
push populations to the very edge of hysteria and madness.
Speaker 1: The theory states this final wave of terror will drown
entire populations in suicide, murder, and permanent psychological disorders. It's
an apocalyptic, high tech haunting.
Speaker 2: The ultimate aim clearly is to create a complete breakdown
of mental stability and societal cohesion, ensuring no meaning resistance as.
Speaker 1: Possible, and Monus even provided a rather specific, highly dramatic,
albeit now historically disconfirmed timeline for this entire sequence to unfold.
Speaker 2: Reading this timeline today, it really provides a chilling historical
marker of that early nineties paranoia. He predicted that twenty
twenty would bring World War III and disaster beyond anything
humans had ever known.
Speaker 1: Well, we certainly had a global disaster, though perhaps not
the World War three he envisioned.
Speaker 2: Then in twenty twenty one, alien artifacts would supposedly be recovered,
signals received, leading humanity to believe the aliens came in
peace to stop the war.
Speaker 1: Twenty twenty two was when the fake aliens would land
in America and impose total control. By twenty twenty three,
the nWo would engulf the entire Earth, turning the planet
into one big prison.
Speaker 2: And finally, twenty twenty five the year when humans would
be genetically altered. He called it genetic alteration to obey
and serve the nWo.
Speaker 1: While the specific dates have passed, the structure of the
prophetic narrative remains highly influential in how can speak uiracy
theorists interpret modern events.
Speaker 2: Doesn't it?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 2: Absolutely, The dates are just shifted forward. The framework remains.
Speaker 1: The overall outcome remains the critical unchanging point of the theory.
After this Night of the Thousand Stars, the global population
would be so utterly traumatized, exhausted, and terrified.
Speaker 2: That they would be instantly ready for the new Messiah,
the Antichrist, to re establish order and peace at any cost.
Speaker 1: They would willingly abdicate all personal freedom and submit to
total control.
Speaker 2: And this is the price of that piece. Everyone will
be required to take an oath to Lucifer with a
ritual initiation to enter the nWo.
Speaker 1: But the theory doesn't just stop at general threats. It
goes into horrifying bureaucraty detail about the fate of those
who refuse this new order.
Speaker 2: We absolutely have to detail the seven classifications for those
who resist the nWo, as the source material is explicitly
clear about the intended methods of control and terror. This
is where Manus moves from science fiction to pure horror.
Speaker 1: So the resistors face ructured, utilitarian system of oppression.
Speaker 2: Classification one, shockingly is Christian children, whom Mon has claimed
would be kept for human sacrifice and sexual slaves.
Speaker 1: Number two are prisoners for medical experiments, and three are
prisoners used as living organ banks. It's just efficient human
resource management for a tyrannical state.
Speaker 2: Four are healthy workers confined to slave labor camps.
Speaker 1: Classification five designated as the uncertain Prisoners. They're reserved for
the International re Education Center.
Speaker 2: Where they'll be subjected to intense psychological pressure, forced to
repent on television and learn to glorify the nWo.
Speaker 1: Classification six is simply the International Execution Center.
Speaker 2: And chillingly, the document mentions a seventh classification that is
yet unknown, a category reserve for future unimagined horrors.
Speaker 1: This detail the yet unknown classification. That's a masterful rhetorical device,
isn't it?
Speaker 2: It absolutely is. It closes the circle of paranoia by
confirming that the threat is boundless and beyond the current
imagine nation of the listener.
Speaker 1: It transforms a narrative from just a list of technical
claims into a genuine existential threat because the threat continues
beyond what is currently defined.
Speaker 2: What is truly remarkable about Project Blue Beam is its
sheer durability.
Speaker 1: It is despite being decades old and highly specific, with
technology and timelines that have clearly elapsed, it remains incredibly relevant.
Speaker 2: It is constantly invoked. It acts as a ready made
narrative during any period of uncertainty or rapid technological change.
Speaker 1: It functions as a perfect narrative filter, doesn't it. The
theory is consistently dusted off and updated whenever unusual astronomical
phenomena like strange lights in the sky or government announcements
about UFOs or UAPs make headlines.
Speaker 2: It instantly reframes official narratives as part of a deeper,
pre planned deception, a test run for the real Blue Beam.
Speaker 1: A perfect high profile recent example of this resurgence occurred
in December twenty twenty four.
Speaker 2: The swarm of mysterious drones or strange aerial lights that
appeared and lit up the US East Coast, covering massive
areas and states like New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Virginia,
New Jersey.
Speaker 1: The sheer visibility of those sightings ignited immediate widespread speculation,
and it connected directly to the PBB narrative and.
Speaker 2: The public commentary around this event clearly shows PBB's influence
at work. Comedian Roseanne Barr a prominent voice in that sphere.
She publicly connected the drones to Project Bluebeam on her podcast.
Speaker 1: She said something like, now you see why I mentioned
Project Blue Beam every week on my podcast exactly.
Speaker 2: She immediately provided her audience with a cohesive, high stakes
explanation for the chaos, successfully fanning the flames of paranoia.
Speaker 1: And this adoption of the PBB narrative by influential figures
is key. Alex Jones has championed the theory for a.
Speaker 2: Long time right. He gave it a renewed endorsement during
an interview with eufologist doctor Stephen Greer, who claimed global
elites are actively planning a hoax of an alien threat
from outer space.
Speaker 1: This framing uses the perceived threat of a false flag
to maintain in a constant state of distrust toward any authority, and.
Speaker 2: Even mainstream political figures weighed in using language that echoed
the theory's foundational distrust, even if they didn't name lou
Beam directly.
Speaker 1: Georgia Congressman Marjorie Taylor Green accused the government of withholding
the truth about the drones, suggesting they might be part
of a military training program.
Speaker 2: Meanwhile, commentators like Matt Walsh raise the possibility of genuine
alien activity. The core takeaway, fueled by monist's legacy, is
always that the official story.
Speaker 1: Is a lie, and we even saw a classic example
of counter claims becoming part of the overall chaos.
Speaker 2: Rup Jeff Van Drew claimed the drones were linked to
an Iranian mothership. I claim the Pentagon swiftly denied.
Speaker 1: But it highlights the psychological urgency people grasp desperately for
any cohesive explanation. No matter how outlandish, when authorities fail
to provide immediate, satisfying answers.
Speaker 2: And PBB provides the ultimate, prepackaged answer.
Speaker 1: For everything, which brings us to the deeper psychological question
what accounts for the sheer durability of such a complex
specific prophecy like PBB, especially when its highly specific dates
have clearly failed.
Speaker 2: This is where we have to bring in this psychological
theory of prophecy failure to explain why the belief persists.
Speaker 1: We turn to the theory of cognitive dissonance, pioneered by
Leon Festinger and his colleagues back in the nineteen fifties.
Speaker 2: The core tenet is that when people hold strongly convicted
beliefs that are contradicted by undeniable evidence, like a specific
prophecy failing, they experience acute psychological discomfort distance.
Speaker 1: The classic studies like the one involving the seekers a
small cult who believed a spaceship would rescue them before
the world ended on a specific date, show what happens
when the predicted event fails to materialize.
Speaker 2: Right, most people rarely abandon their deeply held commitments. That's
just too psychologically painful.
Speaker 1: Instead, they engage in dissonance reducing strategies.
Speaker 2: Two key strategies are proselytization, which is convincing others that
the belief is true to get so social validation and
rationalization and reaffirmation.
Speaker 1: Reinterpreting the failure to mean they simply misunderstood the timing
or that their faith actually prevented the disaster from occurring.
Speaker 2: Project Bluebeam is uniquely suited to survive prophetic failure because
the theory itself is about a hoax.
Speaker 1: That's a great point. So when Monas's specific timeline twenty
twenty twenty one twenty twenty two fails, believers don't have
to admit the theory was wrong exactly.
Speaker 2: They simply adjust their timeline and reaffirm that the HOPX
is still in the preparation stage, or that this particular event,
like the drone swarm, is merely a sophisticated test for
the final Bluebeam show.
Speaker 1: It's a preemptive rationalization.
Speaker 2: By framing the apocalypse as a deception rather than a certainty,
the theory immunizes itself against factual contradiction. The continued non
appearance of the Antichrist simply proves how sophisticated and sneaky
the conspirators.
Speaker 1: Are, it justifies even greater paranoia.
Speaker 2: The theory speaks directly to enduring human fears, the fear
of loss of controls, the sense of manipulation by powerful elites,
and the fragility of spiritual belief in a technological age.
It gives chaos a precise, albeit sinister blueprint.
Speaker 1: Let's circle back to information warfare one last time and
look at PBB as a pure information weapon.
Speaker 2: PBB fits perfectly into the real world influence tactic category
defined by strategic analysts as Cluster three, which focuses on
distortion or creating an entirely new false reality for the adversary.
Speaker 1: The specific tactic being mirrored here is narrative persuasion.
Speaker 2: And PBB is immensely effective because the narrative is simple
despite all its technological complexity. It resonates immediately with pre
existing end times in globalist conspiracy storylines.
Speaker 1: And it contains high impact novelty space lasers, holographic deities,
mind control rays, its compelling stuff.
Speaker 2: The goal of narrative persuasion, according to our sources, is
to transport the recipient into the plotline. When you are
fully absorbed in the story of Bluebeam, imagining the drones,
imagining the Antichrist sermn. You circumvent your logic.
Speaker 1: You actively reduce your resistance to the underlying political message,
which is that the established government and media cannot be trusted.
Speaker 2: The deeper an individual delves into the narrative, the less
energy they spend actively opposing that core message of distrust.
Speaker 1: And the most sophisticated application of this is reflexive control.
Speaker 2: Disinformation in this context seeks to predetermine an adversary's decision
by altering key factors in their information environment.
Speaker 1: PBB is a textbook example of priming the audience. It
primes them to reflexively distrust any future official statement regarding
UFO's alien disclosure or any mask lable event, religious or otherwise.
Speaker 2: It's seen as a governmental false flag operation.
Speaker 1: By injecting this narrative into the public sphere, the creators
of the conspiracy, whether they're real or imagined, ensure that
their target audience will react exactly as intended.
Speaker 2: With profound distrust toward the existing authority, regardless of what
that authority actually presents. A government revelation about alien life
is not seen as disclosure. It's seen as step four,
Part one of Project Flubing.
Speaker 1: So we have journeyed from Serge Monasts nineteen ninety four
publication detailing space lasers, holographic gods and global satanic ghosts.
Speaker 2: Through the chilling New World Order agenda of total economic
dependency and those horrific classification systems for anyone who resists.
Speaker 1: And we've connected that narrative to the theory's cultural role today,
acting as a universal explanation for everything from mysterious drone
swarms to official government UFO announcements.
Speaker 2: The tension here lies precisely between the outlandish technical claims
of the theory and the psychological reality of modern information manipulation.
Speaker 1: The claims projecting deities onto the sodium layer using ELF
waves for telepathic control are sensational and technically dubious, to
say the least.
Speaker 2: But the underlying mechanisms, the need to undermine belief, create
mass hysteria through negativity bias, and introduce a simple, compelling narrative,
those are proven methods of influence and information warfare.
Speaker 1: Mones blueprint, Whether he created it by accident or by design,
it's a nearly perfect template for a psychological operation against
global trust.
Speaker 2: The sources confirmed that knowledge is most valuable when it's
understood and applied. Project Bluebeam, regardless of its truth value,
is this complex articulation of societal anxiety about unchecked technology,
loss of control, and authority.
Speaker 1: It's not just an instruction manual for the apocalypse. It's
a critical cautionary tale about our own susceptibility in the
information age.
Speaker 2: And this raises an important question for you, the listener.
If governments and non state actors are demonstrably using sophisticated
psychological tools, from emotional appeal and negativity bias to strategic
disinformation and narrative persuasion to influence belief in action.
Speaker 1: How do you discern the line between a genuine, chaotic
global event and a weaponized narrative designed specifically to control
your perception.
Speaker 2: What steps do you take to manage your own cognitive
dissonance in a world constantly saturated with conflicting information, And
how do you prevent the most terrifying stories from becoming
the only framework you use to understand reality?
Speaker 1: Something profound to ponder tonight, perhaps while remembering that fear
is the mind killer and knowledge is the cure,