Speaker 1: I want to welcome everyone back to the Pekingiana Show
Speaker 1: and it's just me again. I don't know. I've been
Speaker 1: in the mood to just do solo episodes and readings lately,
Speaker 1: so you got me, and you know, I mean, I
Speaker 1: do so many interviews and the only time I really
Speaker 1: get to talk on my own is the live stream,
Speaker 1: and that's just interacting with everybody, So you know, I
Speaker 1: don't know. Maybe for the summer I'll do a bunch
Speaker 1: of reading. I'm gonna I have some I have people's
Speaker 1: schedules to come on. Don't worry. Of course, Thomas will
Speaker 1: be back on and doctor j will be talking about
Speaker 1: Hegel soon enough, and mister Bagbie will be back, and
Speaker 1: maybe some new people who haven't been on before. But
Speaker 1: this is an article I've wanted to read and talk
Speaker 1: about for a while. It was shared with me years
Speaker 1: ago and I've never had a chance to, you know,
Speaker 1: to go over it and read it. And don't know why.
Speaker 1: I just thought, with everything all of the news coming
Speaker 1: out of England, Scotland and Northern Ireland, that I would
Speaker 1: talk about this. So before anybody freaks out, I know
Speaker 1: a lot of people know the author of this know
Speaker 1: of the author of this article, Andrew Joyce. I would
Speaker 1: love to talk to Andrew Joyce. He drops in every
Speaker 1: once in a while and does like a couple podcasts,
Speaker 1: writes a couple of things, and then he disappears for
Speaker 1: a couple of years. So I haven't heard from mister
Speaker 1: Joyce in probably a year year and a half when
Speaker 1: a couple of new things popped up. But this is
Speaker 1: an article from July twelfth, twenty fifteen, by Andrew Joyce, PhD.
Speaker 1: And basically he's talking about the Windrush generation. Anybody who
Speaker 1: knows anything about what happened to Britain after World War Two,
Speaker 1: Sure they had Indians there. Well, why did they have
Speaker 1: Indians in Great Britain. Well, because they were an empire
Speaker 1: and they controlled India and Indians were going to be there.
Speaker 1: But basically a whole crop of people from blacks, from
Speaker 1: the West Indies showed up, especially on a ship called
Speaker 1: the SS Empire wind Rush. And mister Joyce, because his
Speaker 1: concentration is similar to what I do sometimes, except it's
Speaker 1: his main concentration is the history of the Jewish people.
Speaker 1: He sought to find out if the SS Empire wind
Speaker 1: Rush and this specific beginning of flooding of the island
Speaker 1: had anything to do with them. So I will start
Speaker 1: reading and we'll see where this goes. The SS Empire
Speaker 1: wind Rush to Jewish origins of multicultural Britain starts off
Speaker 1: with a quote, will you find out who is responsible
Speaker 1: for this extraordinary action? End quote? Oliver Stanley MP, June
Speaker 1: nineteen forty eight. The Ssmpire wind Rush holds a special
Speaker 1: place in infamy in the mind of British nationalists. When
Speaker 1: the ship arrived at Tilbury Docks from Jamaica in June
Speaker 1: nineteen forty eight, carrying four hundred and seventeen black immigrants,
Speaker 1: it represented more than just a turning point in the
Speaker 1: history of those ancient isles. In some respects, that signaled
Speaker 1: the beginning of mass, organized, non white immigration into Northwest Europe.
Speaker 1: Back in November, TOO published my research on the role
Speaker 1: of Jews in limiting free speech and manipulating race relations
Speaker 1: in Britain in order to achieve Jewish goals and protect
Speaker 1: Jewish interests. I've recently been revisiting some of my past essays,
Speaker 1: delving deeper and expanding each of them, and expanding each
Speaker 1: of them in an effort that I hope will result
Speaker 1: in the publication of a book like manuscript on aspects
Speaker 1: of Jewish influence. During this process, I've been particularly compelled
Speaker 1: to research further into the role of Jews in Britain's
Speaker 1: immigration and racial questions. What I present in this essay
Speaker 1: as a survey of some interesting facts which I hope
Speaker 1: to document and integrate further as my work on the
Speaker 1: volume proceeds. One of the things that struck me most
Speaker 1: when I began looking into the origins of multicultural Britain
Speaker 1: was the hazy and confused background to the arrival of
Speaker 1: that notorious ship. First, though, I might point out one
Speaker 1: of history's bizarre ironies, the vessel that would signal the
Speaker 1: end of racial homogeneity in Britain started life as a
Speaker 1: Nazi cruise liner. The ship began its career in ninet
Speaker 1: team thirty as the MVY Mancerosa. Until the outbreak of war,
Speaker 1: it was used as part of the German Strength through
Speaker 1: Joy program crawftedorche Freud frud I'm terrible. A German Strength
Speaker 1: through Joy enabled more than twenty five million Germans of
Speaker 1: all classes to enjoy subsidized travel and numerous other leisure pursuits.
Speaker 1: Thereby enhancing the sense of community and racial togetherness. Racial
Speaker 1: solidarity rather than class position, was emphasized by drawing lots
Speaker 1: for the allocation of cabins on vessels like the Mancerosa,
Speaker 1: rather than providing superior accommodations only for those who could
Speaker 1: afford a certain rate. Until the outbreak of war, the
Speaker 1: vessel was employed in conveying NSDAP members on South American cruises.
Speaker 1: In nineteen thirty nine, the ship was allocated for military purposes,
Speaker 1: acting as a troop ship for the invasion of Norway
Speaker 1: in nineteen forty. In nineteen forty four, the Mancerosa served
Speaker 1: in the Baltic Sea, rescuing Germans trapped in Latvia, East
Speaker 1: Prussia and Danzig by the advance of the Red Army. Finally,
Speaker 1: in May nineteen forty five, her German career ended when
Speaker 1: she was captured by advancing British forces at Keel and
Speaker 1: taken as a prize of war. The British renamed her
Speaker 1: Empire wind Rush on January twenty first, nineteen forty seven,
Speaker 1: and also employed her as a troop carrier. Sailing from Southampton,
Speaker 1: the ship took British troops to destinations as varied as
Speaker 1: Suez Aiden, Colombo, Singapore and Hong Kong. Crucially, the ship
Speaker 1: was not operated directly by the British government, but by
Speaker 1: the New Zealand Shipping Company. It is with this little
Speaker 1: fact that we begin tumbling down the proverbial rabbit hole.
Speaker 1: I quickly discovered that the New Zealand Shipping Company, like
Speaker 1: other crucial players in the story of the wind Rush,
Speaker 1: was Jewish owned and operated. The company was for the
Speaker 1: most part controlled by the Isaacs family, particularly the direct
Speaker 1: descendants of Henry and George I Isaacs. Henry and George
Speaker 1: left England in eighteen fifty two at the instigation of
Speaker 1: a third brother, Edward, and arrived in Auckland via Melbourne.
Speaker 1: They established a firm Ian h Isaacs, acting as profiteers
Speaker 1: during the Taranaki and Waikato War and winning a number
Speaker 1: of heavy contracts in connection with the provisioning of the troops.
Speaker 1: Henry took a great interest in shipping affairs and was
Speaker 1: for many years a member of the Auckland Harbor Board.
Speaker 1: He was one of the chief shareholders of the Auckland
Speaker 1: Shipping Company, which was subsequently merged into the New Zealand
Speaker 1: Shipping Company. The other major shareholders of the company were
Speaker 1: Lawrence and Alfred Nathan of LD. Nathan and Company. The
Speaker 1: Auckland shipping industry, like many colonial shipping routes, had by
Speaker 1: the eighteen nineties, been effectively monopolized by Jews. During nineteen
Speaker 1: forty seven, in nineteen forty eight, many former German vessels
Speaker 1: were passed on to several of these contracted private companies
Speaker 1: at the discretion of the Ministry for War and the
Speaker 1: Ministry for Transport. The Secretary of State for War during
Speaker 1: these crucial years was none other than Emmanuel Shinwell, the
Speaker 1: socialist son of Polish and Dutch Jews, with a degree
Speaker 1: of loyalty and patriotism typical of his race. Shinwell was
Speaker 1: discovered by mi I five to have been passing British
Speaker 1: secrets to the Iragoon in Palestine in November nineteen forty seven.
Speaker 1: To Shinwell, disproportionately handing government vessels and contracts to fellow
Speaker 1: Jews would have been mere grist to the mill. In
Speaker 1: nineteen forty eight, the British Empire was crumbling. India had
Speaker 1: been granted independence in nineteen forty seven, and an exhausted,
Speaker 1: overstretched and indebted Britain was busy arranging for the return
Speaker 1: of colonial troops to their homelands and the collection of
Speaker 1: others for present or future conflicts. The wind Rush was
Speaker 1: used mainly for this per until in May nineteen forty
Speaker 1: eight the ship's Jewish operators were given permission by the
Speaker 1: British Ministry of Transport to increase their profits by filling
Speaker 1: to capacity with commercial customers immigrants rather than contracted troops
Speaker 1: at Jamaica before returning to Britain with these new settlers.
Speaker 1: The momentous decision appears to have been taken very arbitrarily
Speaker 1: and certainly undemocratically, since it elicited great shock and confusion
Speaker 1: among British politicians when it later came to light. So basically,
Speaker 1: what he's saying there is very arbitrarily. It would have
Speaker 1: seemed that way to the Brits. But what are the
Speaker 1: intention What's the intention of another group? They might not
Speaker 1: have been so shocked had they considered the ethnic origin
Speaker 1: of the head of the Ministry for Transport who authorize
Speaker 1: that action. The Ministry of Transport in that crucial period
Speaker 1: was Henry Lewis Nathan, formerly a member of the law
Speaker 1: firm of Herbert Oppenheimer, Nathan and vandyk and a distant
Speaker 1: relative of the owners of the New Zealand Shipping Company.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is all just this is coincidence, right,
Speaker 1: I'm not going to pronounce it the way some of
Speaker 1: the women are pronounce it. If the web is already
Speaker 1: beginning to look a little tangled, readers would do well
Speaker 1: to consider some of these developments and coincidences within the
Speaker 1: context of the Anglo Jewish cousinhood, a topic I covered
Speaker 1: for too about well. COO is the occidental observer. That's
Speaker 1: the website I'm reading this off of about three years ago.
Speaker 1: From the early nineteenth century until the First World War,
Speaker 1: English Jewry was ruled by a tightly connected oligarchy. Daniel
Speaker 1: Gutwin states that the Anglo Jewish elite comprised some twenty
Speaker 1: interrelated Ashkenazi and Sephardic families, including the houses of Goldsmith, Montagu, Nathan, Cohen, Isaacs, Abraham,
Speaker 1: abrahams Samuel, and Montefiori. Some of these names have featured
Speaker 1: already and will feature again in the Windrush story. At
Speaker 1: its head, of course, stood the House of Rothschild. This
Speaker 1: network of families had an exceptionally high degree of consanguinity,
Speaker 1: leading it to be termed the cousinhood. Conversion and intermarriage
Speaker 1: in the group was exceptionally rare, if not nonexistent. The
Speaker 1: business activities of the group overlapped to the same degree
Speaker 1: as their bloodlines. I illustrated in my previous essay by
Speaker 1: pointing out that quoting his previous essay. In eighteen seventy
Speaker 1: the treasurer of the London Jewish Board of Guardians was
Speaker 1: Viennese born Ferdinand de Rothschild eighteen thirty eight to eighteen
Speaker 1: ninety eight. Ferdinand had married his cousin Elvina, who was
Speaker 1: a niece of the President of the London United Synagogue,
Speaker 1: Sir Anthony de Rothschild eighteen ten to eighteen seventy six. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: the Board of Deputies was at that time headed by
Speaker 1: Moses Montsfiori, whose wife, a daughter of Levi Barrant Cohen,
Speaker 1: was related to Nathan Meyer Rothschild. Nathan Meyer royal Child's
Speaker 1: wife was also a daughter of Levi Barrant Cohen, and
Speaker 1: thus Montfiori was uncle to the aforementioned Anthony de Rothschild.
Speaker 1: Anthony was married to a niece of Monsfiori. The daughter
Speaker 1: of Abraham Montfiori and Henry Rothschild, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 1: In financial terms, the houses of Rothschild in montsfior had
Speaker 1: united in eighteen twenty four to form the Alliance Insurance Company,
Speaker 1: and most of the families were involved in each other's
Speaker 1: stockbrokering and banking concerns. Ndelman notes that in these firms, quote,
Speaker 1: new recruits were drawn exclusively from the ranks of the
Speaker 1: family end quote. Working tightly within this ethnic and familial
Speaker 1: frame network, the Cousinhood amassed huge fortunes, and in the
Speaker 1: years before World War One, despite comprising less than three
Speaker 1: tenths of one percent of the population, Jews constituted over
Speaker 1: twenty percent of non landed British millionaires. William Rubinstein notes
Speaker 1: that of these millionaires, all belonged to the cousinhood. Do
Speaker 1: we need to have another talk about the ospur groups?
Speaker 1: As I like to say all the time, One thing
Speaker 1: that has really been emphasized this year and basically since
Speaker 1: Trump took office is a look at Haitians coming into Springfield, Ohio,
Speaker 1: but more importantly the organization of Somalis in Minneapolis. That's
Speaker 1: a the OSPUR group A. The Ospur group has no
Speaker 1: intention of assimilating. Some will. For the most part, they
Speaker 1: have no intention of assimilating. And the leaders in the
Speaker 1: organizers are going to do everything they can to enrich themselves,
Speaker 1: while the heritage group that's there while they're going to
Speaker 1: do whatever they can to take from them and lessen
Speaker 1: their power. But there's one diasperg group that you're not
Speaker 1: allowed to talk about. I like to call it the
Speaker 1: final boss of the Osburg groups. It was the cousinhood
Speaker 1: that pioneered the way into direct political power for Jews
Speaker 1: in Britain. By nineteen hundred, through a process of ethnic
Speaker 1: and familial networking, the cousin had secured many of the
Speaker 1: most significant administrative positions in the Empire. Feldman knows that
Speaker 1: the Nathan family alone had by that date secured the
Speaker 1: positions of Governor of the Gold Coast Hong Kong and Natal,
Speaker 1: Attorney General and Chief Justice in Trinidad. Private secrets carry
Speaker 1: to the Viceroy in India, officiating Chief Secretary by the
Speaker 1: Governor of Eastern Bengal and Assam, and Postmaster General of Bengal.
Speaker 1: In parliament, Lionel Abraham's was permanent Assistant under Secretary at
Speaker 1: the India Office, working under his cousin Edwin Montague, who
Speaker 1: was then Parliamentary under Secretary for India. Together with the
Speaker 1: rapid development of a Jewish monopoly over key imperial positions,
Speaker 1: were countless cases of nepotistic corruption and profit seeking. The
Speaker 1: cousinhood was instrumental in disseminating false Russian pogram narratives throughout
Speaker 1: the West, in fomenting the profit driven Boer War, and
Speaker 1: in the Indian Silver and Marconi scandals. To go back
Speaker 1: on the Russian pogram narratives, I can't remember if it's
Speaker 1: KITSHENIV nineteen oh three. I believe it's nineteen oh three
Speaker 1: or Odessa nineteen oh five. But the Jewish press in
Speaker 1: Europe before the pogram, it before anyone even noticed something
Speaker 1: was happening, was writing headlines that twenty thousand Jews had
Speaker 1: been killed in Russia in a pogram. It just didn't happen.
Speaker 1: Soulshansen in two hundred years together details these quote unquote
Speaker 1: programs and lists the dead. My fine heart to believe
Speaker 1: it wasn't only Jews that died. Why this has to
Speaker 1: do with Jewish revolutionaries rising up trying to kill people,
Speaker 1: a lot of Orthodox in nineteen oh five trying to
Speaker 1: overthrow the government, and when the Russians fought back their
Speaker 1: papers in the West scream the pogram and that is
Speaker 1: still in the history books today. The Nathan and Isaac's family,
Speaker 1: who owned and operated the New Zealand Shipping Company, also
Speaker 1: comprised part of the cousinhood. Was the case also with
Speaker 1: Harry Nathan, who occupied the strategically valuable position of Ministry
Speaker 1: for Transport between nineteen forty six and nineteen forty eight.
Speaker 1: These were crucial years in which many foreign and domestic
Speaker 1: ex military vessels were being repurposed for commercial purposes and
Speaker 1: handed over by the Royal Navy to private, most often
Speaker 1: Jewish owned companies, much like the nepotistic corruption at the
Speaker 1: heart of the Marconi scandal. Having a Jew running the
Speaker 1: Ministry for War and a Jewish cousin running the Ministry
Speaker 1: for Transport was good news for cousinhood members who had
Speaker 1: monopolized shipping companies and routes and now stood to gain
Speaker 1: from success successive government contracts to newly acquisitioned vehicles like
Speaker 1: the Empire Windrush. These government contracts in the Jewish quest
Speaker 1: for profit played a huge role in the burgeoning of
Speaker 1: the commercial passenger industry that would bring back bring wave
Speaker 1: after way of Blacks, Indians and Pakistanis to Britain over
Speaker 1: the next two decades. I had mentioned that there were
Speaker 1: already Indians in Britain, but it would have been a
Speaker 1: percent It would have been percentages, percentages, I mean minute.
Speaker 1: It doesn't really concern me whether the beginnings of this
Speaker 1: movement was part of a concerted campaign so fled Britain
Speaker 1: with non whites, whether the motivation was purely profit driven,
Speaker 1: or whether it was a mixture of both. The fact
Speaker 1: remains that Jews occupied conspicuous roles throughout the process. Even
Speaker 1: the method by which Blacks were enticed to set sail
Speaker 1: for Britain must be remarked upon. Around three weeks before
Speaker 1: the Empire windrush arrived in Jamaica, Blacks were bombarded with
Speaker 1: ads for cheap travel to Britain and articles of stolen
Speaker 1: the new life they could have in London. What does
Speaker 1: that sound like to you? Why them? Stephen Pollard writes
Speaker 1: that quote the response was almost instantaneous. Qes formed outside
Speaker 1: the booking agency and every place was sold. End quote.
Speaker 1: Many of the ads were propaganda pieces that presented an
Speaker 1: idealized picture of life and job opportunities in Britain and
Speaker 1: start contrast to the bleak reality. Nonetheless, the ads were
Speaker 1: successful in generating a buzz of excitement among blacks keen
Speaker 1: to make the move to the new welfare state. And
Speaker 1: maybe this is a good time to talk about basically,
Speaker 1: up until World War Two, although not as strong as
Speaker 1: it had in the past, before World War Two, Britain
Speaker 1: was an empire, and they pretty much I've heard it
Speaker 1: explained by right wing English real Brits that basically the
Speaker 1: England gave up an empire for the NHS, for the
Speaker 1: National Health Service, for welfare, for free healthcare. Now, as
Speaker 1: somebody who thinks that in a very small country that
Speaker 1: is tightly knit and mono racial, mono ethnic, monolingual, you
Speaker 1: can probably make that work. And it works in certain
Speaker 1: countries no matter how much libertarian economists. Once you talk
Speaker 1: about how bad their economy is, their economies keep going
Speaker 1: on free healthcare for your brother, for your cousin, for
Speaker 1: your seventh cousin. It makes sense, you might even make
Speaker 1: an argument for it. But what happens when you start
Speaker 1: bringing people in from the outside and then to pile
Speaker 1: on top of it when people start saying, hey, wait
Speaker 1: a minute, we can't take care of these people. You know,
Speaker 1: the NHS is going to go broke if we Well,
Speaker 1: who do you think is going to work for the NHS.
Speaker 1: We're not only bringing these people in here. They're not
Speaker 1: going to be sponging off the NHS. They're going to
Speaker 1: be working for the NHS. Okay, So not only are
Speaker 1: you bringing them in there and people are like world
Speaker 1: war are these people going to work? But oh, all
Speaker 1: these new jobs are being opened up. We're coming out
Speaker 1: of a war, and you're going to give the jobs
Speaker 1: to people who are not our race, don't barely speak
Speaker 1: our language, definitely don't share our culture. And now they
Speaker 1: get it. They get the benefits of it, not only
Speaker 1: the benefits of the NHS, but they're going to draw
Speaker 1: an income from the NHS. Who's going to get left
Speaker 1: out of this, even if not immediately. Daniel Lawrence quotes
Speaker 1: as an example one migrant who explained his move to
Speaker 1: Britain quote, well, I left Jamaica because I saw the
Speaker 1: advertisements in the Gleaner. I left to better my position.
Speaker 1: This was the chief reason end quote. The Gleaner is
Speaker 1: part of the Gleaner Company, which to this day enjoys
Speaker 1: an effective monopoly of the Jamaican press. The company has
Speaker 1: its origins in eighteen thirty four, when it was founded
Speaker 1: by the Jewish brothers Jacob and Joshua de Cordova. I
Speaker 1: would almost certainly expect them to be Sephardic. Since its founding,
Speaker 1: it has been kind of a Jamaican micro cousinhood. Even
Speaker 1: when it registered as a private company in eighteen ninety seven.
Speaker 1: Its first director is possessed a mixture of Ashkenazi and
Speaker 1: Safari names, from Ashenheim to de Moricado. At the time
Speaker 1: the Empire Windrush ads appeared, the managing director was Michael
Speaker 1: Dick Cordova. Even as late as nineteen sixties, and despite
Speaker 1: numering numbering no more than six hundred in the whole country,
Speaker 1: according to Anita Waters, the powerful Jewish minority of Jamaica
Speaker 1: controlled quote many of the larger economic enterprises end quote
Speaker 1: before the socialist policies of the Manly administration were implemented.
Speaker 1: Jews Quote controlled the country's only cement factory, the radio sector,
Speaker 1: the telephone company, and the largest rum company end quote.
Speaker 1: You want to talk about colonization a little bit, how
Speaker 1: the white European gets blamed for colonization. Think you know
Speaker 1: where I'm going with that. For all intents and purposes,
Speaker 1: the Empire wind Rush was passed into Jewish ownership by
Speaker 1: a Jewish Secretary for War, given the green light to
Speaker 1: boost profits and start bringing non whites to Britain by
Speaker 1: a Jewish Minister for Transport, and provided with armies of
Speaker 1: eager passengers by a Jewish owned media. Despite these facts,
Speaker 1: a very different narrative emerged in the aftermath of the
Speaker 1: ship's arrival. Pollard writes that quote. In the years since
Speaker 1: the arrival of the Empire wind Rush, a myth has
Speaker 1: taken hold that the British government was responsible for bringing
Speaker 1: the passengers over as part of a concerted plan to
Speaker 1: help overcome a labor shortage. But this is wrong. It
Speaker 1: is clear from their action of ministers that they were
Speaker 1: as surprised as the public when they first learned via
Speaker 1: a telegram from the acting Governor of Jamaica on May eleventh,
Speaker 1: what was about to happen. End quote. The myth was
Speaker 1: a helpful one because it acknowledged the undemocratic nature of
Speaker 1: the event, while a deflecting blame away from the most
Speaker 1: obvious source of the scourge, the Jews of the shipping
Speaker 1: industry and the Ministry of Transport. It's an interesting fact
Speaker 1: that with the relevant contacts assigned and the process under way,
Speaker 1: Harry Nathan quietly vacated his position on May thirty first. Astonishingly,
Speaker 1: since that date Nathan has eluded all scholarly and journalistic
Speaker 1: attention until my own investigation. The Labor government fumbled in
Speaker 1: the aftermath of the arrival of the Empire Windrush clean
Speaker 1: to the fantasy that upholding that the tradition that members
Speaker 1: of the colonies should be quote freely as admissible to
Speaker 1: the United Kingdom could act as a means of holding
Speaker 1: the crumbling Empire together. So they've already given up the
Speaker 1: empire for welfare, and now they're going to do everything
Speaker 1: they can to make sure that the welfare is enough
Speaker 1: is honey for foreigners unlike them. We're not talking about
Speaker 1: people from South Africa. We're not talking about whites from
Speaker 1: South Africa. We're not talking about whites from New Zealand.
Speaker 1: We're not talking about whites from Australia. No part of
Speaker 1: the cabinets strict adherence to this established but previously superfluous
Speaker 1: protocol may also have been influenced by the interpretation of
Speaker 1: existing immigration law presented to them. The responsibility for interpreting
Speaker 1: existing law for the Crown and the Cabinet lies with
Speaker 1: the Solicitor General, a role that has been occupied since
Speaker 1: nineteen forty five by yet another Jew, Frank Soscus. As
Speaker 1: I noted in a previous essay, Soscus would later introduce
Speaker 1: Britain's first legislation containing a provision prohibiting group libel. Soscus
Speaker 1: was the son of Rush, of a Russian Jewish revolutionary exile.
Speaker 1: It was Soscus who drew up the legislation and piloted
Speaker 1: the First Race Relations Act nineteen sixty five through Parliament.
Speaker 1: The Act aimed to outlaw racial discrimination in public places.
Speaker 1: Quoting Crucially, the nineteen sixty five Act created the Race
Speaker 1: Relations Board and equipped it with the power to sponsor
Speaker 1: research for the purposes of monitoring race really in Britain, and,
Speaker 1: if necessary, extending legislation on the basis of the findings
Speaker 1: of such research. Clearly, Soscus would have been at pains
Speaker 1: to admonish with legal jargon any racist reactions against ministers
Speaker 1: to the arrival of Empire wind Rush and subsequent streams
Speaker 1: of black immigrants sailing on Jewish vessels. It was Soscus
Speaker 1: who informed Arthur Chiech Jones, the anti immigration Minister for Labor,
Speaker 1: that neither the Jamaican nor the British government had any
Speaker 1: legal power in peacetime to prevent the standing at Tilbury
Speaker 1: of the landing at Tilbury of the Empire wind Rush.
Speaker 1: And so the former Montrosa, once a triumphant symbol of
Speaker 1: strength through joy, disgorged its passengers on the Thames as
Speaker 1: part of the new initiative destruction through diversity. It was
Speaker 1: soon followed by numerous other troop ships like the ss Orbida,
Speaker 1: laden with dusky immigrants and stinking of vomit and urine.
Speaker 1: So when you read now about what's going on in Britain,
Speaker 1: especially with Rupert Lowe publishing all the findings on the
Speaker 1: grimming and rape gangs, and you see how politicians, the
Speaker 1: press agencies like the Nudge Unit, how they immediately go
Speaker 1: to bat, how racism is more important to them, or
Speaker 1: looking at a group with suspicion is more important to
Speaker 1: them than white girls being gang raped and raped by animals,
Speaker 1: literal animals use. This is the origins of it. It's
Speaker 1: been building for a long time. This isn't something that
Speaker 1: came out of woke. This has been happening for a
Speaker 1: very long time. It was only during the next Churchill
Speaker 1: government that some reflection took place on the longer term
Speaker 1: implications of what had begun with Churchill. Recorded by Sir
Speaker 1: Norman Brooks remarking, quote, problems will arise if many colored
Speaker 1: people settle here. Are we to settle ourselves? With color
Speaker 1: problems in the UK? Attracted by welfare state? Public opinion
Speaker 1: in UK won't tolerate it once it gets beyond certain
Speaker 1: limits end quote. But by then it was too late.
Speaker 1: Over the course of the following decade, black immigration to
Speaker 1: Britain increased dramatically. Between nineteen forty eight and nineteen fifty two,
Speaker 1: between around two thousand between around two thousand blacks entered
Speaker 1: Britain each year. By nineteen fifty seventh, the figure I
Speaker 1: had climbed to forty two thousand. We're talking about a
Speaker 1: small island that we're not talking about an expensive land
Speaker 1: mass like we have. And I'm not making excuses for
Speaker 1: anything that's happening here. I'm just saying that, yeah, there's
Speaker 1: places to go here, there's places to send them. You
Speaker 1: could even make reservations. But this is a small island.
Speaker 1: Government investigations into the new population to reveal that the
Speaker 1: idea that blacks were helping fill a labor shortage was
Speaker 1: grossly ill founded, and one report completed in December nineteen
Speaker 1: fifty three civil servants stated that the new population found
Speaker 1: it difficult to secure employment, not because of prejudice among whites,
Speaker 1: but because the newcomers had low output in their working
Speaker 1: life was marked by irresponsibility, warrelsomeness, and lack of discipline.
Speaker 1: Black women were slow mentally, and black men were more
Speaker 1: volatile in temperament than white workers, more easily provoked to violence,
Speaker 1: lacking in stamina, and generally not up to the standards
Speaker 1: required by British employers. Maybe this is a good time
Speaker 1: to dispel the myth that you know, these rape gangs
Speaker 1: are just bad people that were sent on purpose from
Speaker 1: Pakistan and places like that to destroy Britain. No. I,
Speaker 1: from what I understand in the Rupert Lowe report, the
Speaker 1: first reports of these gangs was in nineteen fifty five,
Speaker 1: which is interesting because Soscus in nineteen sixty five is
Speaker 1: already having his anti racist laws and organizations put forth.
Speaker 1: Worse future social and criminal patterns were already being established.
Speaker 1: In nineteen fifty four, Home Secretary David Maxwell David Maxwell
Speaker 1: Fife issued a secret memorandum on the cab to the
Speaker 1: Cabinet on blacks pimping white women, stating that quote, figures
Speaker 1: I have obtained from the Metropolitan Police do show that
Speaker 1: the number of colored men convicted for this offense is
Speaker 1: out of all proportion to the number of colored men
Speaker 1: in London, in other words, per capita. Three months later
Speaker 1: he again wrote to the Cabinet stressing that quote large
Speaker 1: numbers of colored men are living on national assistans stance
Speaker 1: or the immoral earnings of white women. End quote. While
Speaker 1: the fame notting Hill race riots of nineteen fifty eight
Speaker 1: are often pointed to as an example of black victimhood
Speaker 1: and the need for a black reaction against white oppression,
Speaker 1: the riots were instead the culmination of white reactions against
Speaker 1: black crime and missagenation. Earlier, in nineteen fifty eight, the
Speaker 1: Eugenic Society now the Galton Institute issued warnings that the
Speaker 1: mingling of races that had started in Britain quote ran
Speaker 1: counter to the great developing pattern of human evolution end quote,
Speaker 1: and attacked the United Nations for minimizing the quote quite
Speaker 1: obvious to similarities between people and individuals end quote. The
Speaker 1: notting Hill riots, occurring a decade after the arrival of
Speaker 1: Empire Windrush, were seeded one August evening when white youths
Speaker 1: intervened in an argument between a Swedish prostitute and her
Speaker 1: black husband, Raymond Morrison. A brawl broke out between the
Speaker 1: youths and Morrison's friends. The following day, some of the
Speaker 1: white youths verbally assaulted the Swede for being a black
Speaker 1: man's trullop. The white youths then assembled between three and
Speaker 1: four hundred fellows to begin a violent demonstration against black criminality,
Speaker 1: resulting in six days and nights of almost uninterrupted inter
Speaker 1: ethnic warfare. This period represented one of the clearest opportunities
Speaker 1: for Britain to turn back the tide, but as I
Speaker 1: have previously documented, it was also the period in which
Speaker 1: the efforts of a largely number of unelected Jewish lawyers
Speaker 1: began the British race relation sham, choking out free speech
Speaker 1: and with any opportunity for effective white resistance where it
Speaker 1: says unelected Jewish lawyers. There is a link and I
Speaker 1: am going to click it. Yeah, he has another full
Speaker 1: article here entitled Jewish Jews, Multiculturalism and the War on
Speaker 1: Free Speech. And it looks to be a case file,
Speaker 1: just numbering case after case after case, and so yeah,
Speaker 1: this is basically naming who was responsible all right. After
Speaker 1: catching fire during a voyage Empire, Windrush sank to a
Speaker 1: watery grave off the coast of Algeria in nineteen fifty four.
Speaker 1: Its legacy was to last much longer. Liberals and the
Speaker 1: cultural Marxist elites named a public space in Brixton, London,
Speaker 1: wind Rush Square, to commemorate the fiftieth anniversary of its landing.
Speaker 1: It also featured during the opening ceremony of the twenty
Speaker 1: twelve Olympic Games, and the salvaged wheel of the vessel
Speaker 1: so it to relic like for veteran at the offices
Speaker 1: of the Open University in Milton Keynes. You your society
Speaker 1: is always going to have a religion, It's always going
Speaker 1: to have religious symbols, it's always going to have worship.
Speaker 1: The only question is is what values and what worship
Speaker 1: is going to benefit your society the most, because all
Speaker 1: they're describing here is religion. Hardcore atheists, when you tell
Speaker 1: them that they worship a religion, whether it be reason,
Speaker 1: whatever it is, they hate it. They don't want to
Speaker 1: hear it. They think it's you know, you're trying to
Speaker 1: start a meme of some sort. But once you understand,
Speaker 1: once you get away from individualism and you start to
Speaker 1: study the group, the mob, when you start to study
Speaker 1: ethnic groups historically, you start to see every single one
Speaker 1: of them worship something, and every single person on the
Speaker 1: planet worships something. They have a belief system that they
Speaker 1: hold as dear as any Christian Muslim. I don't even
Speaker 1: know if that Jews believe anything anymore. Well, I think
Speaker 1: the cow rights are probably a probably have a belief
Speaker 1: I see a more tangible legacy. However, next year and
Speaker 1: he's writing this in twenty fifteen. Last year, Jamaican Lloyd
Speaker 1: Byfield smashed his way into the apartment of londoner Legan
Speaker 1: Duffy after she spurned his advances. Armed with a claw
Speaker 1: hammer and a knife, he stabbed her fourteen times in
Speaker 1: front of her six year old daughter. What made the
Speaker 1: brutal crime. Even more disgusting was the fact that Byfield
Speaker 1: was an illegal immigrant who had previously been jailed for
Speaker 1: thirty weeks after attacking a white woman with a chisel.
Speaker 1: A deportation order had been made during that sentencing, but
Speaker 1: was never carried out because Britain remains as catatonic on
Speaker 1: matters of race and immigration as it was in May
Speaker 1: nineteen forty eight. The motherless, raped and murdered white children
Speaker 1: of Britain are the truest legacy and reflection of that
Speaker 1: fateful voyage. But it is hoped mechanics behind the voyage,
Speaker 1: behind that voyage are now a little better known. Man
Speaker 1: and he twenty footnotes here with links. If anybody has
Speaker 1: read Andrew Joyce before, you know that he is well researched,
Speaker 1: so as we. Yeah, I got I got a chance
Speaker 1: to spend some time with Harry Robinson from the LOADUS
Speaker 1: Eaters recently and hearing the stories firsthand of what's happening there,
Speaker 1: and then seeing the report which I think Rubert load
Speaker 1: dropped yesterday. I think, yeah, it was yesterday. Today's the seventeen,
Speaker 1: that woud have been the sixteenth. H here's your here's
Speaker 1: your origins. Here's who owned the ships, Here's who owned
Speaker 1: the shipping companies. Here's here's who i'm the newspapers. Here's
Speaker 1: who are the head of the departments. What what does
Speaker 1: it the Ospara group do. The Ospara groups are going
Speaker 1: to do what they do, and eventually what happens is
Speaker 1: either total destruction or total takeover. And in the case
Speaker 1: this case of Britain, it's funny someone someone mentioned the
Speaker 1: United Kingdom today and I was like, I need I'm
Speaker 1: I guess I'm just too old to use that term.
Speaker 1: I always hurt Great Britain when I was growing up.
Speaker 1: So in the case of Britain, when you look over
Speaker 1: there and you read about the horrors and you see
Speaker 1: the things that you hear, the stories that I don't
Speaker 1: want people I love to hear. I don't want my
Speaker 1: wife to know anything that is in Rupert Lowe's rape
Speaker 1: gang report. But I'm subjecting myself no matter how no
Speaker 1: matter how much it's going to change you forever. You
Speaker 1: know that you have to solve the problem, but also
Speaker 1: you definitely have to look at where the problem started
Speaker 1: or else it'll just happen again. So that's it. That
Speaker 1: is the ss Empire, win Rush The Jewish Origins of
Speaker 1: Multicultural Britain July twelve, twenty fifteen by Andrew Joyce, PhD.
Speaker 1: And I will provide a link to the article on
Speaker 1: the Occidental Observer in the show notes and I hope
Speaker 1: you learned something first time I read. I read this
Speaker 1: article many times. I hope, I hope you learned something.
Speaker 1: I hope we're I hope some of us are able
Speaker 1: to start opening up people's eyes about the osper groups. Hell,
Speaker 1: my both sides of my family are part of the
Speaker 1: Ospur group that came here. I like to think we
Speaker 1: became American. It's kind of it's kind of if I
Speaker 1: try to compare myself to this to these people who
Speaker 1: were brought here, it's kind of like well, lying fruit, like, hey,
Speaker 1: look how good I am. I hope I add something.
Speaker 1: That's it. Take care everyone, And you know, if you
Speaker 1: want to support the show, you can go to the
Speaker 1: Pekingona show dot com and all the ways you can
Speaker 1: support the show were there. Thank you till the next
Speaker 1: episode