Speaker 1: Foot.
Speaker 2: All right, it's audible foot's down stuff and we see
the place.
Speaker 1: We got a new or ordam right.
Speaker 3: After all, we called the criminal fourth list for qui
conti afterments on two twenty twenty six.
Speaker 4: First case there were a ball.
Speaker 3: There's number two on our list of twenty three eighty
three c R one ninety eight case of Couble versus
Lindsay Clancy. This case is called promotions for the record
for the fast president of the word, the bar possible,
the record the game of the plos.
Speaker 4: You'd have to hear on Fini straight the straight in
the afternoon and Shannon fucking him for the Cubs. So
you plucked him good afternoon. Yeah, I was gonna judge
Kevin Gray. You know what you happened when this class
was like flot so anything good after him? This clas
you good afternoon. All right, So this is the matter
to go on for a number of reasons here I
did anything.
Speaker 2: But first I just kind of wind h to talk
about the evaluation and mining and on.
Speaker 4: There was emotion. It was just recently filed, and by
recently I mean just the last So I'm not gonna
I'm not sure we're gonna, uh address those motions that
were filed. We new gig on those, but one of them, Uh,
there was filed that I didn't know if we could
take up for a bit. Uh.
Speaker 2: And that's one regarding the taping of the commonwealths uh evaluation.
Speaker 4: And I know we've talked about this for a number
of the number of times, so I didn't know if
we can address that or the comb of comwas position.
Speaker 2: My understanding was that there was no objection to to
the taping of the evaluation, with the only proviso on
that dealing with some of the actual testing.
Speaker 4: So like I, I don't know where we stee.
Speaker 5: It on that.
Speaker 6: Yeah, sure I did just for see these motions yesterday.
Speaker 4: So I don't have any letter IEW or anything like that.
Speaker 6: But our position was that we had no objection to
the recording of the examination of the defendant.
Speaker 5: We we don't be objective test at the recording of
the testing process because of proprietary rights for the standardized
testing right.
Speaker 1: Uh, it's ready to I don't know the impact of
video taking the proprietary rights for standardized testing.
Speaker 4: First of all, I would suggest that when I come
on the w for who.
Speaker 1: Kids put out here to protect proprietary rights of private
businesses and enterprises number.
Speaker 4: One, number two.
Speaker 1: Personally, I don't really care about the proprietary rights. When
I concerned is what the actual tests are gonna be
other than to be implemented, other than be administered UH.
And I can speak to UH certainly as a zealous
like you, like consultants who's here today, I could speak
with everybody in there.
Speaker 4: I don't aspires the testing is concerned.
Speaker 1: Usually it's you know, the usual judges, you're well famil
Minister of multiphysis personality, like the inventory all of those tests.
So I don't really have a problem with them not
videotaping the actual filling out of the squares and the
rational tests.
Speaker 4: So I think we can agree that it would be
the interfloy between.
Speaker 1: The government doctors and windsay Aspires that are asking the
questions and her related statements that would be videotas.
Speaker 2: Like I don't know parts it comes to stimulation that
we can My suggestion.
Speaker 1: Is to pick a date to argue this motion, because
prior to I, if I remember, sometimes really able with the.
Speaker 4: UH, the dates and the set and that would allow
whole parties to.
Speaker 7: Kind of get me the information is to the the
need for not keeping the testing or the no need
for it, So then I can I can fashion that
a uh.
Speaker 1: That's a decision that it, but.
Speaker 2: I want to make sure that it doesn't slow down
or interview the actually testing.
Speaker 4: You're we have the testing schedules for aqual tenth right.
Speaker 6: I may have returned, but I thought the fest Montal
just said that he had no objection to not recording
the testing.
Speaker 4: So if that's the case that I think we could
come to an agreement, it's greatly Again. I just like
to consult with them. I own that short you had
in that, but I feel myself that I.
Speaker 1: Don't really have a an issue with not recording and
filling out the little squares and and that type of thing.
Speaker 4: I recrow the life the worldly news. I'm gonna.
Speaker 6: Light think of the you're interviewing and if various some
reasons that defense is.
Speaker 4: Take no, I'm saying there's no question about it.
Speaker 2: Doesn't sound like either side is pjecting to the evaluation
itself being video.
Speaker 4: The only issue receives.
Speaker 2: To be is whether or not the uh, the testing
itself is video tape. And now I'm hearing it probably
isn't much of an objection. So where I'm going to
My suggestion was to allow the taking of the evaluation
and testing and if somebody wants to me to reconsider it,
I and uh come forward with any additional evidence as
to why the testing itself shouldn't be well, I.
Speaker 6: I think that you know it puts a come up
in a position where we received this motion yesterday. I
haven't had a chance to research it or respond, and
yet the allowed you to be a decision allowing that
taping you need.
Speaker 4: We're objecting to everyone wants to take you want. I
don't wanna take the testing portion, alright, Okay, alright, so
one of'm move. What I don't want is I don't.
Speaker 8: Want to delay if yes, right, So, how how much
time would you need to uh prepare for this uh emotion?
Speaker 1: Uh as you run the noose on long trum I
went down Superior up in NJ area, probably when you're
Tuesday and will say, yeah, a lot of the court
supporting when it started at two o'clock in the afternoon,
that sort it's a little difficult.
Speaker 4: How about the second of the marriage for that word.
Speaker 6: SI three strad I'm preparing for a trial that starts
March ninth, But.
Speaker 4: Could you do it more towards.
Speaker 6: You know, March twenty third, and that's gives us it's
probably most before passing is supposed to start.
Speaker 4: I I haven't a fought, but just so so everybody
knows that testings go forward on that day and matter what.
Speaker 6: But so let's see.
Speaker 3: Uh you just special.
Speaker 4: Cause you'd suggest the twenty third, Well that's right about
a second. It was the twenty third March, right when the.
Speaker 1: Candling and forward they go about the year. I mean
I could do. I mean I certainly accorded it. You know, really,
if you throw out there Larch tenth, you be hearing
you guys, A know.
Speaker 4: You trap.
Speaker 7: Second, I know you.
Speaker 4: That's fine. Four purpose and I don't want to give
young Uh every guy's that might think he just wants
your opportunity to speak to his doctor, and so may not.
Speaker 1: I even.
Speaker 2: You need a hearing to the guards stand, but if
it is, it's gonna be a philly short hearing. Most
of this could be done through ath David's if parties
to have it objectively.
Speaker 1: I think what the core probably want to know is
what is it when they say a protection of their
proprietary rights. What is it they're concerned about?
Speaker 4: It is that they don't want to video tape at.
Speaker 1: The filling out the performance or is it the actual
content of the test and guidance? Know it it?
Speaker 4: I I I don't want what they've come up in
the wing this season.
Speaker 2: I know that you're dealing with other parties who want
I want the air position uh being known to the courts. Right,
that's I think we can do that mostly can be
done the way after gave itself.
Speaker 4: Then I can take a look at it. That's fine, okay,
all right? So then what should regarding videotape Maybe I'll
be on through my set. Other than that.
Speaker 2: In regards to be evaluated, any issues regarding the discovery is.
Speaker 4: Required, I to le fourteen key point four. I guess now.
Speaker 2: That uh, this required prior to the evaluation to come
well satisfied that they have that they need.
Speaker 4: Puns.
Speaker 5: Uncil has stated that he's turned over everything these experts
have reviewed and all the raw data from their testing,
So relying on that, I don't believe there's anything else
at this time.
Speaker 2: Alright, alright, it then it comes up just a little
bit of just the kind of going from my checklist
to make sure that we have everything. So so it
sounds like discovery full. The evaluation is UH complete. There
are two other motions.
Speaker 4: That were filed.
Speaker 2: One is regarding UH duror information and the other is
the motion to bifocate.
Speaker 4: Is there something we get out even in the second yes,
well yeah, alright, totally do that cause I just got
those two. I'm rot con few, but they will give
me a chance through to go different emotions as well.
Speaker 2: Right, so, if the parties talked about getting their building
three of the buildings very well. But in regards to
the exchange of the document reports, is there is there
agreement in regards to when.
Speaker 4: Commonwealth's UH word is issued?
Speaker 2: Is it is the agreement tween parties that the lead
exchange of UH the defense work as well as the
commost reports.
Speaker 4: Do you haven't talked about it, but as soon as we.
Speaker 5: Have the reports then to turn them over and requests
theirs in return.
Speaker 1: That's what That's why Bractast remembers that UH once in
the Venomous Raculous Father report, I provide us thevenoment pristmas.
Speaker 4: Right and then but so when you get there that's
any different.
Speaker 2: Then just we can address that, of course, but that's
been my experience as well when when they bowl ringing
the bexchanged between the parties off and see it hather
than a week or two.
Speaker 4: It that I thought was maybe sometime in early.
Speaker 2: June, cause I imagine it'll be UH significant motions of elimonade.
Speaker 1: UH will have to.
Speaker 9: Address UH and that will give us time the case
anything has to be kind of followed up on UH
pride in the trials. But it kind of just wanted
to bouts that off of three way your thoughts would come,
I think.
Speaker 6: That makes sense, your honor, and would ask that would
keep the final three trials dates set with.
Speaker 5: July orteenth and piece any last minute issues come up,
but I think it makes sense to have an earlier
one as well.
Speaker 4: It's crazy theory.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's all we keep did July herd it it's
kind of a true final trial parmas we have, but
we could pick a d D sometime UH.
Speaker 4: Earlier in June completely to view with emotions and liminade.
Also looking at the week.
Speaker 10: Of first where we be the age fourth fifth what
well sorry scarpe trial third record services.
Speaker 6: That that's time all.
Speaker 4: Right, so that that will be the final trial conference.
Speaker 1: UH.
Speaker 4: Parties can hand their emotions in libertate file UH the
week before. Okay, then we can address any of those.
Speaker 6: Yeah, that's how you already you said a week before
or to theas point to what we see too.
Speaker 4: There's a bother that are for TOAs preparation, including the cord.
The other thing is the one March you see March
second we did to view with those emotions, is it
we in.
Speaker 2: The Finnish request h the giv write in avice zooms
just for those quick hearings. I'd like to have it
here alright, and I and i'd have to if I may, on.
Speaker 1: That issue, I would actually get serenely enough like to
commend the sheriffs department at our staff uh Anto experience
the melding together incredibly and done just a modeless job
of transportation and supplies and and taken care of our
answer issues. So I just wanted to put that on
the record. Appreciate the help with the core provider you
ever got as well. I would like to have it
here ificker I so we'll we'll.
Speaker 4: See that kind of gives it.
Speaker 1: Kind of short uh runway, so you can try.
Speaker 4: And we try and get that done.
Speaker 1: Good.
Speaker 4: If not you can't get that done, not critical, I mean, yeah,
we may, we may have to add around on license.
That's why that's our friends.
Speaker 2: The The other thing in regards to another quarter issue
to in order regarding the procedures, which is sealed because
mainly dealt with security issues. I also just kind of
wanted to let counsel home if it's any order, uh,
if you decide or any of the parties feel.
Speaker 4: That order has to be invented or changed, I just
bring it through the court's attention, of course.
Speaker 6: Okay, I here, alright, if I could just asked, but
March second date and the June eighteenth date, are those
at two pm?
Speaker 5: Or if we can't?
Speaker 1: Yeh?
Speaker 4: Does that work for you? It does? And this wasn't
sure if we wanted more time of emotions than them
at oh oh June eighteenth, yes, I think we should
do in the morning or now right, I was thinking
that mind shag.
Speaker 2: Yeah, June eighteen is I don't know how long those
are gonna be to who had prepario town and I puntily.
Speaker 4: Kind of want to think that's all right, so we
will be in recess on this matter. To lose the
March second problem marferences.
Speaker 7: And then there's any issues regarding UH discovery, especially under rule.
Speaker 4: Fourteen point four, probably gonna bring into my attention. We
can deal with that, all right, thank you. All right
to definitely be a recess on this. Think God take
three works Taree sas.
Speaker 1: Thanks good for them.
Speaker 5: That's go