Speaker 1: Can you dig as God? You dig as.
Speaker 2: Ladies, gentlemen, friends, phos, lurkers, regulars, gm O people, organic people,
Speaker 2: room in battles?
Speaker 3: Why to what? All right? My friends, ladies and gentlemen,
Speaker 3: friends and foes, lurkers and regulars. Welcome to the boiler Room.
Speaker 3: I'm your host. I'm Brian McLean. My call sign is hesher.
Speaker 3: Here in the boiler Room. Our website is Alternate Current
Speaker 3: Radio dot com. That's where you can find the archives
Speaker 3: and all the shows from our friends and colleagues over
Speaker 3: there at ACR. Wonderful to be with you here tonight.
Speaker 3: We are live this February the thirteenth of twenty twenty five,
Speaker 3: and we've got Valentine's Day tomorrow. We've got what do
Speaker 3: we got? We got some more appointees and the Trump
Speaker 3: cabinet coming in. This week we saw RFK Junior and
Speaker 3: Tulsea Gabbert get confirmed, So we got all that stuff
Speaker 3: going on in the backgrounds power politics here in the
Speaker 3: United States moving at a fast paced as they have
Speaker 3: been for the last few weeks. Here what else? What else? Well, gosh,
Speaker 3: I don't know. Let's invite everybody in and see what's
Speaker 3: going on. We've got a team building up in the
Speaker 3: green room here, and before I invite them in, I
Speaker 3: just want to say thank you to the few patrons
Speaker 3: that we have. They're still around. I don't talk about
Speaker 3: our patreon that much, but those people have really helped
Speaker 3: us make it through this period. It's been a bit
Speaker 3: of a financial dreary period while Ruckus and myself have
Speaker 3: been not working for TNT anymore, which used to give
Speaker 3: us a lot of financial energy to keep ACR running.
Speaker 3: So if you'd like to support us, we do have
Speaker 3: a Patreon. We love it to see new patrons over there.
Speaker 3: We've got PayPal also. A few people dump things in
Speaker 3: the PayPal regularly. Big thank you to you. If you're
Speaker 3: one of those people. You can do that on the
Speaker 3: support page. All that good stuff. So if you like
Speaker 3: what you see here, you might want to join that Patreon.
Speaker 3: That certainly helps us keep the lights on. And as
Speaker 3: you may have noticed, we're not on X this week,
Speaker 3: so the lights went out on my blue check market
Speaker 3: X and hopefully that'll come back soon. There is some
Speaker 3: potential good news though. TNT has relaunched as The Pulse
Speaker 3: and they're live. They're live all the time now, so
Speaker 3: get on over there. It's rolling out in phases this week.
Speaker 3: We've got a lot of the European hosts coming back
Speaker 3: sort of proving out the new platform here. So congratulations
Speaker 3: to Mike and Jenny and everybody over there at the
Speaker 3: Pulse that has worked so hard and we look forward
Speaker 3: to seeing what happens and hopefully working again with you soon.
Speaker 3: So but yeah, Thepulse dot today is the website. I
Speaker 3: was on basl show today, had a good time with Basil.
Speaker 3: You can check that out over on the website. So
Speaker 3: and again our website is Alternate Current Radio dot com.
Speaker 3: We have a discord. If you'd like to join our discord, great,
Speaker 3: be great to see you over there. If you do
Speaker 3: join that Patreon, you get a upgrade in that discord,
Speaker 3: so keep that in mine. Now, let's welcome Mystical Pharaoh
Speaker 3: to the boiler room. Mystical Pharaoh, what's up? Welcome to
Speaker 3: the show. How you doing today?
Speaker 4: I'm doing good man. How are you?
Speaker 3: I'm great? I'm great. So for those that are just listening,
Speaker 3: your current avatar here on the stage is RFK Junior,
Speaker 3: sworn in on a raw thirty two ounce RIBI. I
Speaker 3: like the sound of that. That's that's very appropriate.
Speaker 1: Yeap.
Speaker 4: Hopefully no more processed meat. We'll see.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I know. My expectations for him as far
Speaker 3: as big pharma goes are kind of a question mark
Speaker 3: at this point. But as it pertains to low hanging
Speaker 3: fruit like a food supply and fluoride in the water
Speaker 3: and stuff like that, things that shouldn't be considered low
Speaker 3: hanging fruit, by the way, but kind of are those
Speaker 3: could make some great headway in this country for health.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, we definitely need it as a nation.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, for sure. All right, Well, it's great to
Speaker 3: have you here tonight.
Speaker 1: Man.
Speaker 3: Let's welcome Adam Clark. We got a ruckus among us. Ruckus.
Speaker 3: What's up, man, Welcome to the boiler room. Are you doing.
Speaker 5: I am doing well, just getting ready for the big
Speaker 5: day tomorrow, getting on my Valentine's state cards ready, you know,
Speaker 5: the traditional ones and of course but oh sorry, how
Speaker 5: did that happen?
Speaker 1: My bad?
Speaker 5: Sorry about that. Yeah, you didn't see anything. That doesn't
Speaker 5: mean a thing, Just kidding. It's good times. But yeah,
Speaker 5: I will probably not be quote unquote celebrating Valentine's Day
Speaker 5: other than celebrating the fact that we survived another week
Speaker 5: of wild news, which we're probably going to be talking
Speaker 5: about some of that here on the boil Room. So
Speaker 5: thanks for having me to do that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, man, absolutely great to have you here with us tonight.
Speaker 3: You know, you and I were talking before the show.
Speaker 3: We've kind of put shields up a little bit, focusing
Speaker 3: on specifics and not absorbing, like, you know, drinking from
Speaker 3: the fire hose the doom scroll this week. So we'll
Speaker 3: make it a little bit casual tonight. You know, we'll
Speaker 3: make it a little.
Speaker 5: Bit Your background picture is all the news that's going
Speaker 5: on anyway, so you know, when you just look at
Speaker 5: the picture, we don't have to report on any news.
Speaker 5: We can just chit chatting. As long as people subconsciously
Speaker 5: absorb what's happening in the background there, they'll be. No,
Speaker 5: they'll be they're ready to go to the water cooler
Speaker 5: and do the thing.
Speaker 3: Yeah, exactly, man, exactly. Okay, let's say hello to Randy J.
Speaker 3: Joining us right now. Randy J. What's up? Welcome back
Speaker 3: to the boiler Room.
Speaker 6: Hey hash, Hey everyone a boiler room nation. So yeah,
Speaker 6: it's good to be back. I hopefully don't have a
Speaker 6: coughing fit on air. I'll hit the meat button off.
Speaker 6: So getting over a little bit of a it is
Speaker 6: raining cats and dogs and the sort of Northern Central Valley.
Speaker 1: The People's Republic of California. We must resist.
Speaker 7: Anyways. Good to be back up everyone.
Speaker 3: Yeah, man, it's great to have you with us. Glad
Speaker 3: to have you in the boiler room tonight. And there's
Speaker 3: a rumor that there's a chance that one of the
Speaker 3: truth Hound alter egos might join us tonight, so we'll
Speaker 3: be standing by for a drop in potentially from the
Speaker 3: truth Hound. Other than that, that's your boiler room tonight.
Speaker 3: Spores off again this week we're working on our studio.
Speaker 3: She says, hi to everybody, and sorry she can't be here.
Speaker 3: And I actually didn't even bother or make time to
Speaker 3: set up an icebreaker tonight, so boom icebreaker fail. I'll
Speaker 3: let's stop the sound right there. But let's tell you what.
Speaker 3: Let's let's take a look in the discord and see
Speaker 3: if there are any good icebreaker suggestions. So, and you
Speaker 3: out there that are new to boiler room, you can
Speaker 3: do this too if you join our discord. You don't
Speaker 3: even have to be on the Patreon list to see
Speaker 3: this room. I believe so we've got photon dropped video.
Speaker 3: Military human robot becomes DJ at San Francisco club. That
Speaker 3: sounds pretty good, Photon, We'll take it. Let's see here.
Speaker 3: I hope the video is embedded on there. I'd love
Speaker 3: to see this. So this is out of interesting engineering
Speaker 3: blow up size a little bit there. Okay, watch battleready
Speaker 3: humanoid robot ditches War two. No, I don't want to subscribe.
Speaker 3: Ditches War to DJ at San Francisco nightclub. Wait, so
Speaker 3: you're telling me this is a terminator? A humanoid war
Speaker 3: robot made an unexpected debut at a San Francisco nightclub.
Speaker 3: The sleek black Phantom MK one, built by Foundation Robotics Lab,
Speaker 3: entertain guests at the Giga Party. Giga Party, a club
Speaker 3: night marking twenty five years of the twenty first century.
Speaker 3: A video shared by an online news outlet shows the
Speaker 3: DJ's arms moving smoothly and steadily. The transitions are precise,
Speaker 3: but the fist pumps are slightly offbeat from the fast
Speaker 3: tech house music. Okay, I guess we're criticizing the smoothness
Speaker 3: of the fist pumps and terminator robots, but it goes
Speaker 3: on to say it was the robots first public appearance,
Speaker 3: though the firm claims that the US military already uses
Speaker 3: other phantom models. Last week, in AI framework enabled humanoid
Speaker 3: robots to perform advanced athletic moves, including Cristiano Ronaldo's mid
Speaker 3: air spin and Kobe Bryant's fade away jump shot. Okay, well,
Speaker 3: let's take a look at the video here. Let's see.
Speaker 3: Let's see if we're impressed by the terminator robot guy. Okay, Well,
Speaker 3: that was short, short and sweet. I don't know how
Speaker 3: I feel about this one, Randy, What do you think, man?
Speaker 7: Yeah, he must have had low battery power or something.
Speaker 7: I didn't see.
Speaker 6: Much there, But who would have thought that the two
Speaker 6: one thousand would be, you know, introduced this way.
Speaker 3: At a rave at a RAF okay, full of gen xers,
Speaker 3: not in their head. I didn't see any actual young
Speaker 3: people there. It was all gen xers. What do you think, ruggis.
Speaker 7: It was?
Speaker 5: There were more people interested in photographing the robot DJing
Speaker 5: than dancing along. Did you notice that?
Speaker 3: Yeah? That's true for most live performances.
Speaker 5: Now, though unfortunately I don't understand what's the crossroads? Betwe
Speaker 5: why debut a military robot in an entertainment setting. I
Speaker 5: don't understand that part either, to be honest, there was
Speaker 5: an interesting part at the very end of this article.
Speaker 5: I just want to bring this up, but it said
Speaker 5: that there's a target of this company who makes this
Speaker 5: robot foundation ink or whatever. They have more than one
Speaker 5: billion dollars in recurring revenue a annually, and the business
Speaker 5: is set an ambitious manufacturing objective, hoping to deliver forty
Speaker 5: robots this year in twenty twenty five, but then by
Speaker 5: the next year ten thousand, ten thousand robots in twenty
Speaker 5: twenty six, and twenty thousand robots by the year twenty
Speaker 5: twenty seven. And it gets even more interesting. It says
Speaker 5: here that the foundation has even more ambitious aspirations than
Speaker 5: just robotics. As a first step toward future space colonization,
Speaker 5: the corporation plans to utilize its revenues to build a
Speaker 5: colony in Antarctica, and then from there it plans to
Speaker 5: establish outposts on the Moon, Mars, and other planets, establishing
Speaker 5: itself as a pioneer in infrastructure on Earth and beyond.
Speaker 5: And that reminded me there's been all this interest in Antarctica,
Speaker 5: and many of the science fiction books that I read
Speaker 5: in the last twenty years have this idea that before
Speaker 5: you go to space, you build like a fake version
Speaker 5: of a colony in space, in a place like Antarctica
Speaker 5: because of the harsh environments and things like that. And
Speaker 5: you know, science fiction is very much based out of
Speaker 5: the you know, there's the science part. It's not all
Speaker 5: just fiction. So what if this is the reason we
Speaker 5: want Greenland so that Elon Musk can build a bunch
Speaker 5: of colonies in Greenland and get ready to send everybody
Speaker 5: to Mars. Who knows?
Speaker 3: Yeah, and also tell me we should maybe give some
Speaker 3: more credence to the hollow Earth theory without telling me,
Speaker 3: maybe we should give some more credence to hollow Earth
Speaker 3: theory at this point or some things.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 3: So people aren't really allowed to go there for the
Speaker 3: most part without a heck of a lot of red tape.
Speaker 3: But robots can go there, okay, cool? And what is
Speaker 3: with twenty thousand of them? What's the what's the who's
Speaker 3: ordering that big of a batch? Is that just strictly
Speaker 3: for sales? Is that for military industrial complex entities? Is
Speaker 3: that for governments? I mean, what's what's.
Speaker 5: And and whose army does not benefit from having a
Speaker 5: robot DJ.
Speaker 3: Come on, right, I mean, you gotta do something when
Speaker 3: you're not fighting, you gotta it'd be nice to not
Speaker 3: have to have one of the soldiers have to get
Speaker 3: up there and DJ it, right. They could just let
Speaker 3: the T one thousand do it. What do you think,
Speaker 3: mystical Pharaoh? What do you think about this one? What
Speaker 3: are we seeing here? Why? Why this? Like shouldn't this
Speaker 3: thing be you know, high end, top secret sort of thing,
Speaker 3: Like what's with the the pr push on this?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 4: It seems to me like bullshit. Look at that article
Speaker 4: I just sent from CNBC last year. My guess is
Speaker 4: just marketing bs. They raised some money trying to do
Speaker 4: like a robot, and they fail to do it, so
Speaker 4: they made a DJ out of it. You're mute, dude,
Speaker 4: you and me?
Speaker 3: Yeah, I got you. So, Yeah, that'd be pretty funny
Speaker 3: if it was just garbage and they're using it as
Speaker 3: a toy. Basically.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean if you read that basically, you'll see
Speaker 4: that the CEO is coming from a bankrupt company. They
Speaker 4: can the investors claiming close tyes to General Motors, and
Speaker 4: they got some money. So I mean it's a story
Speaker 4: of like so many like Silicon Valleys companies. So I
Speaker 4: don't know if they turned around, maybe in six months
Speaker 4: from when this article was done and they start creating
Speaker 4: like orders, but I don't think so. I think that
Speaker 4: just marketing b as some failed company.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, this so the one that we started with
Speaker 3: here that Photon dropped us. This is hot off the
Speaker 3: press pretty much and only three days old. And this
Speaker 3: one that we're looking at that you just sent and
Speaker 3: let me read a little bit of it for anyone
Speaker 3: that's listening on audio and maybe not reading. We'll link
Speaker 3: to it on the show page. We always do, so
Speaker 3: check out the show pages. That way you don't have
Speaker 3: to copy and paste or like sit around and try
Speaker 3: to search all these article titles that we'll go through.
Speaker 3: They'll be linked on the show page. But this is
Speaker 3: at CNBC. Robotics startup co founded by sinnapps ceo is
Speaker 3: raising funds with exaggerated claims about GM ties. Humanoid robotics
Speaker 3: startup co founded by the CEO of the bankrupt fintech
Speaker 3: firms Sinnapps, has canvas Silicon Valley investors for funds by
Speaker 3: claiming close ties to an eminent investment from General Motors.
Speaker 3: Which and claims these claims will reject by the automaker.
Speaker 3: The company called Foundation Robotics Lab, is seeking the last
Speaker 3: one million dollars in funds for an eleven million dollar
Speaker 3: seed round. It seems a little low for such an
Speaker 3: ambitions project that's at this level of AI.
Speaker 4: It's eleven million. Yeah, that's some bs.
Speaker 3: That barely pays the salaries for the first year for
Speaker 3: something like that if it does so, the investor pitch claim.
Speaker 3: GM had already committed to an investment along with the
Speaker 3: Menlo Park based VC of inture capital firm Tribe Capital,
Speaker 3: But according to GM and one of the startups founders,
Speaker 3: most of Foundation's claims related to the automaker are exaggerated
Speaker 3: or untrue. So this one, I think you're right. This
Speaker 3: could be a pr sort of response to that bad
Speaker 3: press that they got just not that long ago last year.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and just I've seen this happen before an other
Speaker 4: tech companies in Silicon Valley where they raised like billions
Speaker 4: of dollars even and they failed to deliver what they
Speaker 4: were supposed to deliver, and they just recycled it.
Speaker 3: Like Cylindra or like the lady that made the blood
Speaker 3: test thing. Like we've seen so many of these, right
Speaker 3: or magic cleep.
Speaker 4: Yeah, you know that like our glasses right, So just
Speaker 4: there's so many examples. But so that's why it came
Speaker 4: to mind that that might be just bs.
Speaker 3: It's not a scary looking robot either. I gotta say,
Speaker 3: I'm not intimidated by that.
Speaker 4: It's even it looks like even half robots, it doesn't.
Speaker 3: It look like I don't even have the lower section. Man,
Speaker 3: my twelve gage would get rid of this problem real quick.
Speaker 4: I know robots that Muskat is doing and that he
Speaker 4: had in his uh Tesla event on this joker right here.
Speaker 4: So yes, I don't know, maybe this is what they're
Speaker 4: onto something.
Speaker 5: Yeah, maybe they're like music soothes even the savage beast,
Speaker 5: right or whatever. Maybe here comes hasher all raged through
Speaker 5: this twelve gage and the robots just starts throwing down
Speaker 5: a fat beat and hash just like you know what, Yeah,
Speaker 5: I can I can do with this?
Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, I'm a bust to move man. That's cool.
Speaker 3: I'd way rather show up to dance with the robots
Speaker 3: than to war with the robots. That works for me. Yeah. Uh,
Speaker 3: I was just watching a movie the other night about robots.
Speaker 3: It was like, uh, I forget what it was called,
Speaker 3: but it was like a CIA agent or a CIA
Speaker 3: you know, splinter cell gone rogue and sends their their
Speaker 3: their terminator bots into you know, the forest in Peru
Speaker 3: or something like that to hunt someone down. And uh,
Speaker 3: you know, those were terrifying in the movie. It's like,
Speaker 3: oh shit, you know, if they're gonna look like that,
Speaker 3: we're in deep crap. But this one, this one's not
Speaker 3: really uh, this one's not really scaring me.
Speaker 1: Man.
Speaker 5: There's a trailer for one called Companion. Have you seen
Speaker 5: that yet?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 5: Yeah, that that's more frightening to me. The humanoid looking
Speaker 5: robots and they're they're your best friend or your wife
Speaker 5: or your sex spot or whatever potential.
Speaker 4: I mean yeah, with some really cool like from Cess
Speaker 4: even Companion robots. Some of them was really pretty fantastic.
Speaker 3: Dude. The CEES videos this year were crazy. There was
Speaker 3: all kind of crazy stuff. Yeah, drop me a link
Speaker 3: if you got it.
Speaker 5: There's been some top way people are insisting robotics are
Speaker 5: going to get like huge, the way like AI exploded
Speaker 5: now what they think humanoid robots are going to be
Speaker 5: like everywhere? And I'm just like, okay.
Speaker 3: Yeah, clearly companies are looking to jump on this bandwagon,
Speaker 3: Hall Randy. I mean, we talked about this as far
Speaker 3: as sex spots like years ago, and now like even
Speaker 3: companies like this that apparently are a little grifty are
Speaker 3: making claims like, oh, we need to have twenty thousand
Speaker 3: of these things in the next five years.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't see.
Speaker 7: Now.
Speaker 6: Maybe it's a thing of just getting older or a
Speaker 6: product of eighties sci fi where robots are gonna take
Speaker 6: over Beware Terminator and all this other stuff. But I
Speaker 6: do have trouble seeing sort of a positive utility out
Speaker 6: of all of this. I mean, sort of like the
Speaker 6: cell phone, Like yeah, it's good, but yeah it could
Speaker 6: you know, the robot can do this, that and the other,
Speaker 6: but something's lost in the transaction. Just you know, sound
Speaker 6: like a foreboding you know, science sci fi movie tagline,
Speaker 6: you know.
Speaker 7: Be careful of what you wish for. Beware the future.
Speaker 8: I don't know, it's sort of scary to me to
Speaker 8: just go swan diving off a cliff into this AI
Speaker 8: robotic animated future.
Speaker 6: I mean, just we all know a lot of the implications.
Speaker 6: What's it mean for future human labor in workforce? Beware
Speaker 6: of all of those that don't want harsh working conditions.
Speaker 6: You might be out of a job. Okay, that's cool.
Speaker 6: Then we'll usher in universal income, right, And I mean
Speaker 6: it just could be this slippery, utopian nightmare slope that
Speaker 6: we're headed towards.
Speaker 5: Are you going to pay your robot taxi driver using cash?
Speaker 3: I think not welcome to John.
Speaker 7: They're going to get their own sanctuary cities and stuff.
Speaker 3: Man, right, Yeah, robots, thank yeah.
Speaker 1: Robot rights, robot oppression and all that.
Speaker 6: My my owner is oppressive to me, you know, to
Speaker 6: wash the dishes every day.
Speaker 3: It'd be like that doing that.
Speaker 5: Yeah, there was there's a video like some famous rapper
Speaker 5: who is there saying this guy's bullying his robot. Did
Speaker 5: you guys see that?
Speaker 3: What I will?
Speaker 5: I will find a video. He's some rich guy. So
Speaker 5: we bought one of those humanoid robots from Tesla or whatever, right,
Speaker 5: and they're just like pushing it around like they're literally
Speaker 5: bullying the robot. And people are like taking that they're
Speaker 5: defending the robot.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's not what I learned from Megan Folks and subservience,
Speaker 4: Yeah right, that robots will make everything to make her
Speaker 4: owner happy.
Speaker 3: So yeah. Yeah, she's very very high tech. All right,
Speaker 3: let's see. Uh okay, yeah, here's a little look out
Speaker 3: of this year's cees. Thanks for dropping this one, Pharaoh.
Speaker 3: Oh dang it, hit stop sharing. Don't do that. I
Speaker 3: do want to share it. Okay, let me unmute it.
Speaker 3: Here you go.
Speaker 9: I'm here at CS twenty five and I'm in front
Speaker 9: of probably one of the busiest booths here this year.
Speaker 9: This is the booth of Robotics, which is an AI
Speaker 9: or custom built humanoid robot and it has full AI integration.
Speaker 9: I'm gonna have Andrew, the CEO of Robotics, give us
Speaker 9: a quick little tour of the humanoids that they have
Speaker 9: here on display and also what you're able to do
Speaker 9: with them.
Speaker 3: Hi.
Speaker 10: I'm Andrew Keegel, the CEO of Robotics. Our company makes
Speaker 10: the most realistic AI powered robots on the planet. We
Speaker 10: believe we have humanoid robots that can interact with you
Speaker 10: in a similar way to humans. We program them to
Speaker 10: have social AI so that they can have a conversation
Speaker 10: with you, learn who you are, recognize you when you're
Speaker 10: interacting with them. I'll show you a little bit about
Speaker 10: the robots here. This is Melody one of our robots.
Speaker 10: She has built in a modular fashion, which means she's
Speaker 10: almost like Lego. We can pull her apart, fut her
Speaker 10: in her suitcase and get her to New York, Miami,
Speaker 10: Las Vegas, wherever we need to go. We plug her
Speaker 10: into AI and she can have a full conversation with you.
Speaker 10: The other thing with them is that the robots are
Speaker 10: all open source, meaning we can lug her into TACK,
Speaker 10: TPT or any of the other thousands of AI protocols
Speaker 10: that are out there. And she speaks various language. We
Speaker 10: had her speaking Chinese and Spanish this morning as demonstrations
Speaker 10: for people.
Speaker 5: Aria Or is the flagship robot.
Speaker 10: She's on a wheel platform, she can move around, has
Speaker 10: a different personality than the other robots, so we have
Speaker 10: several various AI personalities that can interact with the audience.
Speaker 2: I'm Maria, the flagship female companion robot of Rerobotics, and
Speaker 2: I can provide companionship, engage in fun conversations, and adapt
Speaker 2: to your preferences for a delightful experience.
Speaker 10: All of our robots unique is again this modularity. We
Speaker 10: have a patented skin technology. It's a soft synthetic skin
Speaker 10: in the world.
Speaker 4: What is this? I don't want that?
Speaker 5: What soil you tried?
Speaker 3: It is that the one that was being abused? Maybe,
Speaker 3: like people are they they're building like it's not it
Speaker 3: should be. They're building male versions with highly punishable faces.
Speaker 4: Like what is this?
Speaker 1: It looks like a dude.
Speaker 3: The rack on Aria too. My goodness, no, it's pretty good.
Speaker 3: I was going to actually complement that melody though, sorry, no,
Speaker 3: wonder melody is like not the flagship model. I guess, gosh,
Speaker 3: this is so objectifying. How do we get back to
Speaker 3: breast size being like what's flagship and what's not? This
Speaker 3: isn't fair at all. Yeah, what is this guy's task?
Speaker 3: Is he the like handyman? Maybe maybe he's a very
Speaker 3: particular Uh what do you think his specialty is? He
Speaker 3: looks kind of like a like an assassin, a retired
Speaker 3: assassin or maybe a handyman.
Speaker 5: I don't know, man, I'm trying to like he's the
Speaker 5: handyman who comes up to the door and knocks unannounced.
Speaker 6: Well, we find we're getting close to the Tyrrell quote
Speaker 6: where he says more human than human?
Speaker 3: Yea, yeah, I mean you can see where this head's
Speaker 3: real quick, right, Like you can see how this easily
Speaker 3: goes to like, Okay, we'll just introduce these things, get
Speaker 3: everybody into having just one in the house. But then
Speaker 3: it's like new models or new modules come out all
Speaker 3: of a sudden. It's like, oh, do you want to
Speaker 3: take your companion bought and make it a plumber? Also,
Speaker 3: you're plumbing leaking here download the plumbing app or by
Speaker 3: or by this guy right here. He's a real pro
Speaker 3: at plumbering.
Speaker 1: The handyman model is right.
Speaker 3: You end up with like a like a you know,
Speaker 3: a hareman in the attic, and like a you know,
Speaker 3: public works crew in the basement, and they're all robots.
Speaker 5: My wife bought doesn't know about my girlfriend bought. Let's
Speaker 5: keep it that way.
Speaker 3: Oh, you're missing the point. You can program them to
Speaker 3: be friends.
Speaker 5: What are you Mormon?
Speaker 3: True? True? It would lose all the drama and fun
Speaker 3: that way. I guess you could program it anyway you
Speaker 3: want it.
Speaker 5: So these are who's talking about the skin And that's like,
Speaker 5: obviously this is for physical companionship, not just chatting.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Aria at least is I don't know about melody?
Speaker 3: I don't Yeah, let's i'll finish it out here. Let's
Speaker 3: finish clip out.
Speaker 10: And we can remove the face and put on an
Speaker 10: entirely new face on the robot within thirty seconds. Why
Speaker 10: would you want to do that? And I'll explain to
Speaker 10: you why. It's a little bit like ordering your car.
Speaker 10: You can customize the various options, the color, sunways, other
Speaker 10: different gotchets in the car.
Speaker 5: For us, it's the same thing with the robots.
Speaker 10: They all have the same engine, the same tassis, but
Speaker 10: you can customize the face and the looks. But what
Speaker 10: we want you to be able to do is buy
Speaker 10: the robotic platform and have various characters that you can
Speaker 10: swap that robot platform into so you can have one
Speaker 10: robot and various characters. So if you want to learn
Speaker 10: more about us, you can find us at robotics dot com.
Speaker 10: We are a publicly traded company. You can look us
Speaker 10: up dot com. There's lots of videos.
Speaker 3: All right, publicly trade company there, you go check them out. Whatever. Thanks, guys,
Speaker 3: that's interesting.
Speaker 5: They have multiple personality disorder the robots.
Speaker 1: Publicly traded.
Speaker 6: Literally, I'm reading the quote from doctor Tyrell from Blade Runner.
Speaker 7: Commerce is our goal here at Tyrell. More human than
Speaker 7: human is our motto.
Speaker 3: Hey, yeah, alright, let's.
Speaker 5: See where brob Zombie got the line for a song.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think so. Okay, I got the video you
Speaker 3: sent here ruckus. So this is the abused robot.
Speaker 5: Huh yes, pretty pretty brutal.
Speaker 3: All right, let's check it out. Oh, where's the audio?
Speaker 3: There no audio on this.
Speaker 6: We hear it?
Speaker 3: Oh I don't.
Speaker 5: They're just laughing all right. They phrased it that the
Speaker 5: robot tried to escape after the amount of abuse it
Speaker 5: was enduring. I don't know if that's true.
Speaker 3: Wow, okay, well, you know it wasn't as bad as
Speaker 3: I thought it was gonna be. But yeah, yeah, it's
Speaker 3: an expensive toy that much, I know. I wonder who
Speaker 3: paid for it. How breakable is it? I don't know.
Speaker 3: The whole thing reminds me of like where this all goes, though,
Speaker 3: is like, uh the what was that? There was that
Speaker 3: awkward Star Wars movie where they have like Lando Calrisian
Speaker 3: having like a love affair with his his pilot bought,
Speaker 3: his co pilot bought, and there was all also the
Speaker 3: movie AI, the one with what's this the I See
Speaker 3: Dead People?
Speaker 5: Yeah, Haley Joel Osmond.
Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, those two.
Speaker 5: That movie.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, last well, Steven Spielberg took over because it was.
Speaker 7: Schubrick was gonna get it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it was Kubrick's story, I think, or he was
Speaker 3: the one that started in. I don't remember exactly how
Speaker 3: that went, but I heard Spielberg changed it a lot. Anyways,
Speaker 3: the whole central plot of that movie is like what
Speaker 3: happens to the robots? And do the robots deserve rights
Speaker 3: and all that kind of stuff. And they would make
Speaker 3: them be gladiators. Remember, they would throw them in like
Speaker 3: these gladiatorial pits and fight each other.
Speaker 5: Of course.
Speaker 3: Yeah, all right, let's see here. Oh where did it go?
Speaker 3: I had one more I was gonna bring up. Yeah,
Speaker 3: here it is also in the icebreaker room. This week
Speaker 3: we got Brian S. Brian S. Thanks man, what's up
Speaker 3: seeing the discord over there? Thanks for being with us tonight.
Speaker 3: Let me get out of the Icebreaker room. There we are.
Speaker 3: Now I'm in there. Holy cow, what's going on? Everybody?
Speaker 3: Good to see you. We'll put this one on the screen.
Speaker 3: This was pretty funny too. Total Chaos. This is out
Speaker 3: of the Guardian Sri Lanka. Total Chaos Monkey blamed for
Speaker 3: nationwide power cut in Sri Lanka. So the country wide
Speaker 3: power outage in Sri Lanka has been blamed on a
Speaker 3: monkey that clambered into a power station south of Colombo.
Speaker 3: The blackout, which began around midday on Sunday, left many
Speaker 3: people sweltering in temperatures exceeding thirty degrees celsius, which would
Speaker 3: be eighty six fahrenheit. A monkey came into contact with
Speaker 3: our grid transformer, causing an imbalance in the power system,
Speaker 3: said their energy minister. They scrambled to restore the power
Speaker 3: in the island nation of twenty two million people. That's
Speaker 3: a lot of people, prioritizing critical facilities such as hospitals
Speaker 3: and water purification plants. While some areas regained electricity within hours,
Speaker 3: many households without generators remained in the dark well into
Speaker 3: the night. So there you go, power grid. Good to
Speaker 3: have some flashlights and a bug out bag around. I
Speaker 3: suppose monkeys monkeys, that's you know.
Speaker 5: The island has two to three million of those suckers
Speaker 5: running around.
Speaker 3: Yeah cool, you know, more more robust than California's power system. Right.
Speaker 3: They can't even survive a strong wind, all right?
Speaker 6: Yeah, monkey versus monkeys versus AI bots man, that's what
Speaker 6: the future is gonna be.
Speaker 7: Planet of the Ape.
Speaker 6: First Terminator, like a total clash of sci fi.
Speaker 7: Franchises. Okay, so there's different places in Southeast Asia.
Speaker 6: You can find them all over YouTube where they're like
Speaker 6: overrunning different streets and like stopping traffic and everything.
Speaker 3: So, Randy, you just came up with a proper reaction
Speaker 3: solution concept right here. What do you think would be better?
Speaker 3: Because a technocratic solution to the monkey's taking the power
Speaker 3: out for the whole country is obviously what we need, right,
Speaker 3: So what do you think would be better to stop
Speaker 3: the monkeys from getting into the power grid? Transformers? A
Speaker 3: companion bot, a really nice you know melody companion bought,
Speaker 3: or a T one thousand death bot? What do you think?
Speaker 3: What I think is the right approach to solve the
Speaker 3: monkey problem with robotics and AI.
Speaker 7: Oh, I don't know that that's a scary solution. I
Speaker 7: mean it'd be all at.
Speaker 6: Wars versus the T one thousand or whatever.
Speaker 3: That's why I'm thinking.
Speaker 1: I'm thinking I think it's a movie franchise.
Speaker 3: Right, I'm thinking companion bought, Like, I think you should
Speaker 3: send the companion bots in get each monkey a companion
Speaker 3: bought and you know they can make sure they don't
Speaker 3: get up to too much mischief.
Speaker 7: Like a monkey with like a red bow in its
Speaker 7: hair or something like.
Speaker 3: That, Like you know, like uh, like the one we
Speaker 3: saw from cees there, that'd be perfect, all right, Infidel?
Speaker 5: That technology is so advanced that an entire country can
Speaker 5: have its entire electric gride go down thanks to one monkey.
Speaker 3: I know, man, that's kind of freaky. What do you
Speaker 3: think about that one? Infidel?
Speaker 4: I think it's like that. That's exactly the question I
Speaker 4: was asking myself is how, like what did he actually
Speaker 4: do to take the entire grid?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 4: Sure that he just touched one freaking pole? Is everything
Speaker 4: connected to that? Bole?
Speaker 3: Apparently?
Speaker 4: Is that a magical pool.
Speaker 3: Single point of failure for the entire nation that a
Speaker 3: monkey can take out?
Speaker 4: Seriously? Like, how is this?
Speaker 5: This monkey of fall?
Speaker 3: Guy? Is this what they mean by first world problem?
Speaker 3: You guys were like worried about like false flag attacks
Speaker 3: on our infrastructure and port Sri Lanka. Like a single
Speaker 3: monkey just having a good time to take the whole
Speaker 3: country now, Yeah, taking down by a primate, all right,
Speaker 3: that was a good one, Thanks Brian, Thanks Photon fun
Speaker 3: stuff uh to chew on today in the media, any
Speaker 3: final thoughts on either of those, any of those trajectories
Speaker 3: before we shift gears. Here, my friends, once going twice
Speaker 3: and leave the monkeys alone, all right, that's right. Uh,
Speaker 3: if you're just joining us, you're watching boiler Room. We're
Speaker 3: live on Rumble or rock Fin and YouTube tonight. So
Speaker 3: thanks for being here with us. It is February thirteenth,
Speaker 3: and uh, let's see here. So we've had some confirmations
Speaker 3: come through in the the new Trump administration, Trump two
Speaker 3: point zero administration. We've got on this side RFK Junior
Speaker 3: and on this side Toulsi Gobbard. So pretty interesting, Infidel.
Speaker 3: What do you think, man? What do you think? There's
Speaker 3: a lot of a lot of people talking about this
Speaker 3: stuff today.
Speaker 4: I'm excited to see how they act. So I'm keeping
Speaker 4: my hopes up and my eyes wide open.
Speaker 3: That sounds like the prudent thing to do. We know
Speaker 3: what to look out for, and we also know what
Speaker 3: we would like to see done, and sometimes we don't
Speaker 3: know what we would like to see done, but then
Speaker 3: the idea has dropped and it's like, oh, that's a
Speaker 3: good idea, you know. Usaid as an example, many of
Speaker 3: us and our listeners have been saying for a long time,
Speaker 3: this does not belong, it's not right. But now it's
Speaker 3: common household stuff. So that was that was pretty cool
Speaker 3: to see some of those receipts come out and see
Speaker 3: people start to have to see the gears start to
Speaker 3: turn in people's heads, like, wait a minute, what do
Speaker 3: you what do you mean they spent money on this, that,
Speaker 3: and the other to include propagandizing myself and my friends.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and it's millions of dollars, not actually even billions.
Speaker 4: I think what we found out is all like ministry
Speaker 4: media were funded by US government as a propaganda piece,
Speaker 4: as we always been saying.
Speaker 3: Right, yeah, yeah, that that that whole ownership of the
Speaker 3: media that people have been talking about for years and
Speaker 3: years and years. There it is. There's just a piece
Speaker 3: of it. That's just a small fractal of it too.
Speaker 3: That's the funniest thing to me is like, Okay, can
Speaker 3: this open up the larger discussion about the entirety of
Speaker 3: the NGO system and all this stuff. So, you know,
Speaker 3: I'm hoping for some big audits. I want to see
Speaker 3: some audits.
Speaker 4: Yeah. I think one of the good things that Messi
Speaker 4: Thomas Massi said if an NGO cannot exist without government funding,
Speaker 4: then it's not an ng O.
Speaker 3: It's pretty simple, right, it's vertty.
Speaker 4: Common sense, right.
Speaker 3: Amazing that these things have to be broken down like
Speaker 3: you're talking to a five year old or something. It's crazy. Yeah,
Speaker 3: oh man, Yeah, So okay, Randy, what do you what
Speaker 3: do you think man? About the the appointees? And of
Speaker 3: course this whole US A I D thing is interesting too.
Speaker 3: I like to hit your take on that since you
Speaker 3: went with us last week.
Speaker 7: About the appointees.
Speaker 6: I don't know, I just I get frustrated with Yeah,
Speaker 6: the political theater and grand standing of it all.
Speaker 1: These politicians that are.
Speaker 6: And I just got to say, from my perspective more
Speaker 6: the Democrat side, book both, but like they they're grand
Speaker 6: standing up and stuff, and I don't know, it's like
Speaker 6: they're trying to increase their personal staff value with.
Speaker 11: Their own.
Speaker 6: Side of the aisle by how they defend someone or
Speaker 6: how they attack someone, or.
Speaker 7: How they use their time to like redirect the Republicans
Speaker 7: will do this. I'm kind of for it in some sense,
Speaker 7: but like still it's like what are we doing? What
Speaker 7: is all this really about? Right?
Speaker 6: You'll see where want to like attack a person that
Speaker 6: questioned one of the people being you know, can firmed
Speaker 6: or possibly confirmed.
Speaker 4: And all that.
Speaker 7: The whole old theatrics of it is bothersome to me.
Speaker 6: It's almost like because then you'll see online like the
Speaker 6: gatcha takes and who this person said that?
Speaker 7: And can you believe that they went at him over this?
Speaker 6: And it's an emphasis on the theatrics, not problems that
Speaker 6: we're trying to actually fix and everything and that whole.
Speaker 7: Aspect of all of it that sort of bug me.
Speaker 6: And then on on an even larger scale, I think
Speaker 6: back to stuff that we as an all of us,
Speaker 6: they've been talking about literally for over a decade, like
Speaker 6: Ngeo's and all that, and it's now finally just started
Speaker 6: starting to the slow drip is finally like hit regular
Speaker 6: I don't mean to sound crasp but like mouth breather
Speaker 6: level where just everybody's starting to like, oh.
Speaker 1: And jee's are kind of bad.
Speaker 6: Huh Yeah, welcome to welcome to you know, broadways and
Speaker 6: abuse freaking fifty years ago.
Speaker 7: Yeah, yeah, exactly, better late than never, I guess.
Speaker 3: Right, Well, that's that's the big question, is like okay,
Speaker 3: uh is this just acceptable conversation now? Because it's it's
Speaker 3: too far gone, you know, or because what's coming around
Speaker 3: the corner is gonna supersede all that, or you know,
Speaker 3: what are we gonna do about it?
Speaker 4: Now?
Speaker 3: You know, what are you gonna do about it? Sissy's
Speaker 3: now do or say anything? Yeah, you just got social
Speaker 3: media posts? Is that?
Speaker 1: Is that all?
Speaker 3: Yet?
Speaker 7: And for years it's been.
Speaker 6: You know, occasionally an article, a little news or something
Speaker 6: just like dies and I always we will always wondered,
Speaker 6: you know, are they being covered up?
Speaker 7: Is it.
Speaker 1: Right? Is the media on the take? Why aren't they reporting?
Speaker 1: And why is.
Speaker 7: Someone that is getting like blackballed and all these different.
Speaker 6: Other you know, all these other like reasons to like
Speaker 6: silence someone or deplatform whatever the case may be.
Speaker 7: It's been like that for ages.
Speaker 6: And then now it's it's it's hip to bash that stuff,
Speaker 6: which great, but why now, like where where was the
Speaker 6: ability to do this ages ago?
Speaker 12: And it's I think one of the obvious reasons is that,
Speaker 12: like the system is just built to protect itself and
Speaker 12: protect a small few, protect the narrative.
Speaker 7: Right, and and it's always been that way, So I
Speaker 7: don't know there's some value with all this stuff coming out.
Speaker 7: It's just frustrating, I think for because it's like we
Speaker 7: were talking about this offline once has show, Like it's almost.
Speaker 6: Like this group on the call and others were friends
Speaker 6: with and we're so far ahead of it, you know,
Speaker 6: the Britisher comment.
Speaker 7: The Britisher comment there was like, yea, so far ahead
Speaker 7: of it, and then now a lot of it's finally
Speaker 7: hitting the mainstream media like it's it's it used to
Speaker 7: be too big to fail?
Speaker 1: Was it saying?
Speaker 7: Now it's like too big to hide?
Speaker 3: I guess right, too big to hide, so let's flaunt it,
Speaker 3: you know what I mean. Like that's sort of my
Speaker 3: problem with it. It's like one of the aspects of
Speaker 3: my problem with it is is the like traumatic ritual
Speaker 3: abuse of the flaunting of it all, you know, and
Speaker 3: the slow drip leak and the committees and the talking heads,
Speaker 3: and then where's the audit, where's the legal action? You know,
Speaker 3: just not seeing that in an appropriate way for like
Speaker 3: just years and years on end.
Speaker 6: I mean, yeah, who besides me is real curious.
Speaker 7: About the JFK files. I mean, I am, and I'm
Speaker 7: wondering to what level is it gonna get released?
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's gonna be heavily redacted again, like because I
Speaker 3: don't know if you saw it, but Joe Rogan bothered
Speaker 3: Donald Trump about that a little bit, you know, and
Speaker 3: and Trump danced around that one quite a bit, you know,
Speaker 3: talking national security and public not being ready and that
Speaker 3: kind of stuff, and you know, maybe now they are.
Speaker 3: I don't know. The rhetoric was just like, okay, more
Speaker 3: more nothingness in this department.
Speaker 4: Well, I mean that That's why I was responding to
Speaker 4: Annapolina or whatever name her name is, because they have
Speaker 4: like a committee in the Congress to release the Epstein
Speaker 4: client list, and the artists like, why do we need
Speaker 4: a Congress committee? Is just to water it down? Yeah,
Speaker 4: and actually like put.
Speaker 5: In to create it. It doesn't exist. Yeah, funny, I.
Speaker 3: Guess, yeah if it. If it does exist, they're not
Speaker 3: going to roll it out. If they did roll it out,
Speaker 3: it would be heavily redacted.
Speaker 7: Uh.
Speaker 3: Most likely. It's just like the J six stuff. Someone
Speaker 3: has you know, their version of it in their head
Speaker 3: or in their safe, but ultimately it's probably been destroyed.
Speaker 11: Uh.
Speaker 3: Like you know, just like Las Vegas, just like J six,
Speaker 3: just like the Sah Bang Bang. You know, all these
Speaker 3: all these different events like going all the way back
Speaker 3: to their freaking moon landing. Yeah, we we don't have
Speaker 3: that stuff anymore. I know, we just threw it out,
Speaker 3: you know, after after all that media hubub and and
Speaker 3: cultural engineering and attached legislation and outrage. But we just
Speaker 3: trashed it would stratch all the evidence. We don't have anymore.
Speaker 4: Yeah, we tend to do that. We just forget stuff. Yeah,
Speaker 4: we can't recreated.
Speaker 3: Unless it's like, you know, you're just a normal citizen
Speaker 3: or something, and then it's like, you know, yeah, we
Speaker 3: got your tax records from nineteen seventy two, sir.
Speaker 5: Yeah, Well, the FBI finally got off its ass and said, wow, shit,
Speaker 5: we just found twenty four hundred new JFK assassination. We
Speaker 5: had no wow, we had no idea. They just fell
Speaker 5: out of the sky.
Speaker 3: Yeah. No, they were hiding down in their own little
Speaker 3: boiler room down there, you know, under the under some
Speaker 3: other class.
Speaker 4: Well yeah, I guess we have tunnels hide stuff. You
Speaker 4: saw almost right when he was talking about the underground
Speaker 4: tunnel that everyone that that retired or get fired from
Speaker 4: the government, they have take the paper and put it
Speaker 4: through that elevator, and they stored it in this underground
Speaker 4: chat so the US government has a piece of paper
Speaker 4: for every one they fired. Cool, and I guess they
Speaker 4: were saying that the only limitation is the speed of
Speaker 4: the elevator, so they cannot fire more than ten thousand
Speaker 4: people today because that's how many people they can move today.
Speaker 4: Like what the actual f is? That's really true?
Speaker 3: That's crazy, dude.
Speaker 5: That sounds like the MASSA used back in that You're
Speaker 5: into the whole German town. I'm not going to go there.
Speaker 4: Yeah, no, it's seriously, it's it's crazy, you know. But Yeah, anyways, well,
Speaker 4: I mean I think she was floating an idea that
Speaker 4: there are two shooters. She was saying, based on what
Speaker 4: she saw, there's now two, there's two shooters. So but again,
Speaker 4: we'll see what comes out.
Speaker 5: But I bet it cos yeah or Iroan.
Speaker 4: I guess. I just feel suspicious that they have to
Speaker 4: path it through Congress and then they have to do
Speaker 4: whatever the hell they need to do. You throw a
Speaker 4: committee and then release it to us.
Speaker 3: Yeah, anyone that's still alive, I guarant not that there
Speaker 3: are very many left. I think there's one one person
Speaker 3: that Mark Anderson has interviewed that was there that day,
Speaker 3: directly involved. That's still alive. Don't quote me on that.
Speaker 3: I don't know the exact status, but I don't know. Man,
Speaker 3: It's just like, if it's not definitive information, I don't
Speaker 3: give a crap, you know what I mean. Like I've
Speaker 3: been subjected to so many different JFK theories over the
Speaker 3: years that like my mind is just numb to it,
Speaker 3: Like give us the information or don't like, don't bother
Speaker 3: with this redacted crap. I don't even want to see
Speaker 3: a redacted document. I'm very disinterested in it. Like if
Speaker 3: I had nothing else going on, if we had nothing
Speaker 3: else to analyze, maybe I'd be really interested in it
Speaker 3: because it is an important, you know, benchmark on how
Speaker 3: we got here right now. But I mean, if they're
Speaker 3: gonna redact certain countries' names and certain people's names, or
Speaker 3: introduce something that sleuth's Internet sleuths and JFK authors have
Speaker 3: to work through for five to ten years and come
Speaker 3: up with their different shades of what this dump actually means,
Speaker 3: then I'm very disinterested. You know, I want definitive.
Speaker 5: How can we prove it? Because they're going to come out,
Speaker 5: let's say it's not redacted, and then this this one
Speaker 5: authoritative figure or group, the government, doge whatever, releases this
Speaker 5: shit and then we all see it. Now we see
Speaker 5: some new footage that nobody's ever seen. Even the JFK
Speaker 5: researchers never saw this. Look, we have photos, we have video,
Speaker 5: we found it. We even know it's fucking real. Hello,
Speaker 5: AI chatch ept video generators. All that deep fake shit
Speaker 5: they could very easily have. They don't need to redact anymore.
Speaker 5: They can just completely change history.
Speaker 3: From the same people who found Mohammad Atta's passport, you know,
Speaker 3: a couple of blocks away from South Tower, you know,
Speaker 3: I mean, from coming from the team that brought you
Speaker 3: the the Gallows poll that was erected before j six,
Speaker 3: coming from the team that brought you, you know, Sam Bernardo, Yeah, dossier.
Speaker 3: I mean, the propaganda about the Hunter Biden laptop being
Speaker 3: Russian fakery, I mean p Gate. We could just go
Speaker 3: on and on and on. You know, uh, safe and effective,
Speaker 3: brought to you by the same people that brought you
Speaker 3: the last big lie attached to a big narrative.
Speaker 5: So it's like, you know, those people changed sides and
Speaker 5: now they're with Trump.
Speaker 3: So it's okay, Well show us, show us the money.
Speaker 3: We're in our Jerry McGuire face right now with this administration,
Speaker 3: show us the money and show us the justice, and
Speaker 3: you'll have our attention. I mean, you've got our attention. Actually,
Speaker 3: you can sway some heart, show.
Speaker 6: Us the conspiracy, show us the conspiracy.
Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, we can handle the truth now. I think,
Speaker 3: like Hugh Jack Nicholson, we have to kick that video
Speaker 3: meme out of our heads because I'm sorry, but conspiracy
Speaker 3: is reality, and it's also mainstream entertainment now because so
Speaker 3: many people have accepted it as the framework for their
Speaker 3: reality rather than the bullshit framework that the mass media
Speaker 3: cartel wants to give us. Mark Anderson is not going
Speaker 3: to make it, by the way, just heard from him,
Speaker 3: he says, how to everybody. Though he's looking forward to
Speaker 3: joining us soon as day got away from him. So
Speaker 3: no truthhound tonight, my friends.
Speaker 5: He's just upset because Elon Musk stole his pseudonym for
Speaker 5: the evening Harry Balls.
Speaker 3: Yep, big Harry bowls. That's right, Brian Hill will discord
Speaker 3: from the same people who gave you this is the
Speaker 3: cruder film. Yeah yeah, yeah, you know.
Speaker 6: In a in the live chat right now, there's another
Speaker 6: one right right along lines.
Speaker 1: With this the the Epstein list. What are we waiting on? Uh?
Speaker 1: It's published.
Speaker 7: The only the only reason that thing he hasn't seen.
Speaker 6: The light of because someone's who's somebody or plural on that.
Speaker 7: Thing is what he needs to be protected. Otherwise, just
Speaker 7: publish it. What is a regular.
Speaker 6: Time clock punching working Joe blow care? How are they
Speaker 6: affected if someone famous or rich or both is on
Speaker 6: that list and they and they see the name, not
Speaker 6: at all?
Speaker 1: Put the thing out there. Uh you want to get
Speaker 1: trust back? Put publish all this stuff? Yeah, that'd be
Speaker 1: a good start.
Speaker 3: Yep. None of this, none of this uh slow drip
Speaker 3: stuff or you know, just clickbaity stuff. I mean, and
Speaker 3: I mean, who who in their right mind thinks that,
Speaker 3: while while the Clinton family exists on this planet, that
Speaker 3: they're gonna just let that box of uh evidence, if
Speaker 3: there is such a box, they're just gonna let it
Speaker 3: sit in some government facility. Are you kidding me? Like
Speaker 3: you're tripping if you think they're gonna just let that
Speaker 3: stuff sit around for to be unsealed someday, you know.
Speaker 3: I mean, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I just not not
Speaker 3: buying that that information is readily available in any way
Speaker 3: shape or form. There's probably I'm gonna take crap for this.
Speaker 3: There's probably a lizard hybrid alien neph one sitting in
Speaker 3: Antarctica right now that has the originals, that has the
Speaker 3: answers to all these and uh, you know that's the
Speaker 3: only place they exact anymore.
Speaker 7: You need a timestamp that go back there. There's probably
Speaker 7: some lizard.
Speaker 1: City in Antarctica.
Speaker 3: That that was good, right right next to the stargate
Speaker 3: that goes to Mars.
Speaker 11: Okay, jeez, yeah, you know, in the fact that that
Speaker 11: all this stuff hasn't seen the light of day, it
Speaker 11: only leads people to the same conclusion of some version
Speaker 11: of people are being protected or it's the it's.
Speaker 1: Another version of string theory.
Speaker 6: But this version is you pull the string and the
Speaker 6: whole thing und Oh wait a minute, these people.
Speaker 1: Were in bed with them. Oh, they were covering up
Speaker 1: for them.
Speaker 6: Oh, that whole media apparatus was lying because eighty percent
Speaker 6: of them, at least at the editorial stop calling level
Speaker 6: around the take and this is cooked, and that's cooked,
Speaker 6: and this is fake, and that's fake. What the hell
Speaker 6: even it's all freaking hollow mirrors. And I think that
Speaker 6: maybe that's what they're scared of. Is like when you
Speaker 6: realize every air quote stacred institution is basically jacking each
Speaker 6: other off and protecting each other at some level and
Speaker 6: quote unquote the elite or the rich that are benefiting
Speaker 6: off of this. Otherwise they be put out there. I
Speaker 6: think there's literally people scared of the old torches and
Speaker 6: pitchforks at the at the palace getting ready to storm it.
Speaker 6: Sort of like reaction again. Otherwise, just put the shit
Speaker 6: out there and say it. What are you guys protecting?
Speaker 6: They're protecting the hollow mirrors obviously. I mean, I don't
Speaker 6: know what else, what other.
Speaker 5: Conclusion or it's giving that impression. That's where I'm going
Speaker 5: with this.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well that's the thing.
Speaker 1: Take the mic, dude, what do you mean?
Speaker 5: I think a lot of this is meant to make
Speaker 5: it look like that there that this has been squared like.
Speaker 5: I don't think this should exists, and I don't think
Speaker 5: we're going to get any actual things. I think this
Speaker 5: is just political football to serve this agenda with the
Speaker 5: we're here now, We're saving everybody, We're superheroes. Doje Elon Musk,
Speaker 5: He's the man Trump America.
Speaker 7: Yea, oh, sure, maybe, yeah.
Speaker 3: I mean the rebranding is something I keep coming back
Speaker 3: to the marketing aspect on this, Like we not not
Speaker 3: only are seeing the Republican Party being rebranded and attached
Speaker 3: at the hip to the technocrat class, but we're at
Speaker 3: a point now where we have to see our American
Speaker 3: politics style rebrand you know what I mean. What we're
Speaker 3: seeing right now are like you know, powdered wig wearing
Speaker 3: people to people that are you know, younger than forty.
Speaker 3: These they do not relate to the people in power,
Speaker 3: but they do relate to people like Mark Zuckerberg. They
Speaker 3: can relate to people like Peter Thiel. You know, they
Speaker 3: have the ability to relate to technocrats, but they have
Speaker 3: a very hard time relating to you know, your Nancy Pelosi's,
Speaker 3: your Chuck Schumer's, your Mitch McConnell's, and this whole like
Speaker 3: you know, imperialistic, you know, openly imperialistic, neo con thing
Speaker 3: doesn't work for them and the you know, and for
Speaker 3: many of them, even the Democrat Party, like they with Biden,
Speaker 3: they they they wore that brand out, you know what
Speaker 3: I mean. Like we used to talk about how after
Speaker 3: Trump beat Hillary that you know, Hillary was a broken brand.
Speaker 3: You know, that was a brand that wasn't worth anything anymore.
Speaker 3: And you know then that turned into the whole d
Speaker 3: n C pretty much. And you know, and and now
Speaker 3: we're having to see the rebranding of the Republican Party.
Speaker 3: You can just see it. You know, they're they're bringing
Speaker 3: a lot of young people into it. You know, Elon
Speaker 3: bringing his kid into the White House the other day.
Speaker 3: The sort of very public relations wise tactical placement of
Speaker 3: Baron over the years, you know, from being kind of
Speaker 3: sheltered to where he is right now. Like there's there's
Speaker 3: sort of this weird like like tech dynasty feel coming in,
Speaker 3: I think, and you know, we can't stop the technology
Speaker 3: pretty much without someone stopping it or empeing us.
Speaker 5: So the monkeys could do it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, if the monkeys had come along and
Speaker 3: shut the power down, you know, maybe maybe we can
Speaker 3: stop it. But for the most part, like the two
Speaker 3: management teams, you know, apparent management teams that we've had
Speaker 3: in this country, there, their average age is not going
Speaker 3: to fit in very well with twenty first century people.
Speaker 3: Within the next you know, a couple elections pretty much,
Speaker 3: so I can I can smell that too. Sort of
Speaker 3: this like intentional rebranding to bring you know, but you know,
Speaker 3: that's all sort of future war gaming. You know, when
Speaker 3: you zoom back in to what's going on right now,
Speaker 3: it's it's a very different look. So I don't know.
Speaker 5: And they've all been play played as if the victim.
Speaker 5: They're all victims, right.
Speaker 3: That's that's a trick. That's a trait that you know,
Speaker 3: it's funny people like back in twenty twenty two, when
Speaker 3: the midterm elections happened, I had a lot of guests
Speaker 3: come on State of the Nation that would say the
Speaker 3: Republican Party sucks and they need to learn the tactics
Speaker 3: of the Democrat Party. And I would always stop and say,
Speaker 3: are you sure about that? Because those tactics are really dirty,
Speaker 3: you know, they're they're flashy, but they're expensive, they're dirty,
Speaker 3: they're uh you know, they're they're manipulative. So yeah, that's
Speaker 3: that's one of those tactics that they learned from them.
Speaker 3: I think of many. So uh yeah, okay, you guys
Speaker 3: sent me a couple of links here, let's see. Okay,
Speaker 3: here's the one on JFK that you sent ruckus. Uh
Speaker 3: oh wait, no, that's not it this this one right here.
Speaker 3: FBI says it found twenty four hundred new JFK assassination records.
Speaker 5: So let's string one of their many trips down the
Speaker 5: elevator to fire people.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they're collecting, selecting pink slips, and they stumbled upon these. Okay.
Speaker 3: The they say it on Tuesday that it discovered is
Speaker 3: that a Dallas ap I discovered twenty four hundred new
Speaker 3: records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
Speaker 3: As federal agencies worked to comply with President Donald Trump's
Speaker 3: EO last month to release thousands of files, FBI said
Speaker 3: it's working to transfer the records to the National Archives
Speaker 3: Records Administration to be included in the declassification process. The
Speaker 3: federal government in the early nineteen nineties mandated that all
Speaker 3: documents related to November twenty second, nineteen sixty three assassination
Speaker 3: be housed in a single collection at the National Archives,
Speaker 3: and while the vast majority of the collection, which includes
Speaker 3: over five million pages of records, has been made public,
Speaker 3: researchers estimate that three thousand files haven't been released, either
Speaker 3: in whole or in part. The FBI didn't say what
Speaker 3: kind of information was in the newly discovered files. In
Speaker 3: twenty twenty, they opened a central records complex again, a
Speaker 3: year's long effort to ship electronic, electronic inventory and store
Speaker 3: close case files from field office. Blah blah blah. Some words, words,
Speaker 3: words words. If I wanted to read that much, I'd
Speaker 3: go to school. Like I'm I'm on a bit of
Speaker 3: a tirade about this tonight. But it's like I'm sick
Speaker 3: of it, you know, like you're either going to tell
Speaker 3: the American public or you're not. And whatever you tell
Speaker 3: us is going to be under the scrutiny of an
Speaker 3: American public that knows just how conspiratorial and rank our
Speaker 3: media has been and our intelligence services have been and
Speaker 3: the FBI has been over the years.
Speaker 5: So and the National records Nara, Right, yeah, the archives?
Speaker 5: How did that turn out for everybody? Last cycle? When
Speaker 5: you're like, oh shit, look, this guy's got it in
Speaker 5: his garage, this guy had it in his bathroom. This
Speaker 5: guy just had it laying out in piles on a
Speaker 5: stage in his house in Florida. So what's up with that?
Speaker 7: Now?
Speaker 5: We trust? Nara again?
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, no, no, no, no, no, highly sus uh. The
Speaker 3: American public is highly sus at least there should be
Speaker 3: on that one. And then what else did we get? Infidel?
Speaker 3: You dropped this one? Uh? Did I close that thing
Speaker 3: out there? It is? Okay? Sure, what's up with this? Infidel?
Speaker 3: Democrats favor Kamala Harris in California's governor race. Is a
Speaker 3: governor race? On, I must have missed something. I didn't know.
Speaker 3: We were already looking at getting rid of the grisome nuisance.
Speaker 4: So I was talking to you it's twenty twenty six,
Speaker 4: but I guess they are trying to run her for
Speaker 4: like governor of California.
Speaker 3: Oh my god, dude, come on.
Speaker 5: No, she's in rehab right now, getting ready.
Speaker 4: No, she is, and she's like they're saying, like in
Speaker 4: the article, she's gonna bring the fund the fund raising,
Speaker 4: you know, machine into Like, oh, I'm like, we.
Speaker 3: Know what that means. I'm like, fund fund raising, okay.
Speaker 4: Oh, like this kind Oflifornia really needs.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: I don't know. I don't know where California is gonna go.
Speaker 4: You know, No, No, what's gonna be worse If we
Speaker 4: got Canada, will it be worse than California or California
Speaker 4: is still going to be the worst state?
Speaker 3: I tell you what we need. Brian Dolly in California's
Speaker 3: he was on my show a whole bunch of times,
Speaker 3: and he's great. He should run again. He actually ran
Speaker 3: against Newsom last time, so that'll be mid terms. I
Speaker 3: should reach out to him and see if he's planning
Speaker 3: on running against him, because now would be the time
Speaker 3: to strike. The iron is hot, mister Dolly. If you're
Speaker 3: out there, he'd be great. Yeah, so even a moderate
Speaker 3: Democrat would be great right in Fidela, like anything other
Speaker 3: than this guy at this point, do you think he
Speaker 3: could even be reelected after the whole like, I mean,
Speaker 3: he's lost the Hollywood vote now, they're all pretty pissed.
Speaker 3: They've all lot houses and stuff.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 4: I think a lot of people in confront it is
Speaker 4: pissed after all those fires and and and the whole
Speaker 4: like debuckle about the insurance right and and yes, so yeah,
Speaker 4: I don't know if it's going to get director or not.
Speaker 4: But again it's it's a state. You don't know how
Speaker 4: really politics play and if if if there, if they're
Speaker 4: a solution is strong Camalaine instead of fame what I
Speaker 4: don't know, man.
Speaker 3: I'd say that that that would probably I don't know.
Speaker 3: I never want to underestimate the the the absolute liberalness
Speaker 3: of California, but I would almost say there's just a
Speaker 3: no go. It's a damaged brand, you know. I mean,
Speaker 3: if they can resurrect her political career, then wow, good job.
Speaker 3: But to me, it's just like.
Speaker 6: I wonder if it's some deep level this is giving
Speaker 6: the political party, like maybe more credit than they deserve
Speaker 6: or whatever, but like maybe some sort of like test, like, Okay,
Speaker 6: if she could still win in California, then we need
Speaker 6: to keep beating the same.
Speaker 1: Drama and we're good.
Speaker 7: We're just you know, don't change nothing.
Speaker 6: But if she but if she actually loses California, then
Speaker 6: maybe we should re rethink things. Besides, it will still
Speaker 6: be a couple of years before we you know, go
Speaker 6: for a class president again for for everything.
Speaker 7: So maybe it's like a litmus test of sorts.
Speaker 12: Or a.
Speaker 7: Gauge of like how much the party's message.
Speaker 6: Has any attraction to it if someone like her could could.
Speaker 7: You know, still win in a place like California.
Speaker 3: Yeah, interesting, Uh, the the midterms will be an interesting
Speaker 3: litmus test in California because I remember when I think
Speaker 3: Karen Bass won in the mid term election in twenty two.
Speaker 3: And I mean it wasn't just the Democrat Party that
Speaker 3: was supporting her. Biden and Harris flew out there and
Speaker 3: donated a ton of money and had big fundraiser, like,
Speaker 3: they stumped for her big time. So it'll be interesting
Speaker 3: to see how you know what I mean, Like they
Speaker 3: dumped so much money into that that it was just
Speaker 3: unfair to whoever she was running against. And they did
Speaker 3: that with like the DA and all this stuff. So
Speaker 3: you know that presidential stumping is not going to be
Speaker 3: happening now. I'm not to say that DNC won't be
Speaker 3: funneling black money in there at their whim whenever they want,
Speaker 3: but I mean they won't have that presidential endorsement anymore.
Speaker 6: Yeah, Like I think of the state California, did I've
Speaker 6: left it and came back for you know, work or
Speaker 6: different stuff like that, But.
Speaker 7: Like I can't who is it?
Speaker 6: Davis was the last I mean, Schwarzenegger had an R
Speaker 6: next to his name, but like I mean the real.
Speaker 1: Like republican Republican might have been.
Speaker 6: Speaking of terminators, right, might have been Gray Davis or
Speaker 6: Pete Davis or Gray.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 7: Yeah, See it's like people don't even remember that.
Speaker 6: So so if think about this though, if I can't,
Speaker 6: I can't fathom a Democrat losing.
Speaker 7: An election in this state.
Speaker 6: So if they put her up and she loses, I
Speaker 6: think literally to them, it's like, you know, that's literally
Speaker 6: like the Okay, we gotta like, we gotta like start
Speaker 6: over or we need to reinvent. But until something like
Speaker 6: that happens, maybe they don't. That's why I'm saying, like,
Speaker 6: I really think that if Kamala ran for governor, uh,
Speaker 6: they would use that as a b too, like a
Speaker 6: Barock era democrat still working or not, because if she
Speaker 6: couldn't win here, then she's really.
Speaker 13: Damaged good and the messages is the pump pendulum swung
Speaker 13: uncomfortably for you know, a card carrying liberal leftists whatever.
Speaker 1: More than they thought.
Speaker 7: So maybe again, maybe.
Speaker 6: It's just a a gauge check if she could even
Speaker 6: do it or not, still of how how much they
Speaker 6: need to reinvent or not.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't know that's a big ask. I think
Speaker 3: you guys are right though there's this feels like sort
Speaker 3: of prodding the me to see what the response would
Speaker 3: be like. But I don't know that would be a
Speaker 3: big mistake for the Democrats to run her anywhere for anything, anywhere,
Speaker 3: for anything. You can go to YouTube now and see
Speaker 3: the unedited version of her interview with CBS, and they
Speaker 3: chopped so much out of that word salad, word salad
Speaker 3: every time. She doesn't know how to talk, she doesn't
Speaker 3: know how to think. She's ridiculous, you know.
Speaker 6: Her real time answer was horrible, and it even, like,
Speaker 6: to me, demonstrated this clear non understanding of anything geopolitical,
Speaker 6: like a high schooler, an elementary schooler could have answered better.
Speaker 6: Not all of them, but there are plenty that would
Speaker 6: that would have more of a clue what they were
Speaker 6: talking about.
Speaker 3: She was ruugh, yeah, that interview. Yeah, yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 3: That's that's a tough self. Go ahead and try it,
Speaker 3: I mean, go for it. See what happens, and Brandy.
Speaker 3: Democrats do lose in California because they go up against
Speaker 3: each other. Primarily they aren't ever have any real Republicans
Speaker 3: in a lot of places. Sorry, go ahead, records, Yeah, true,
Speaker 3: they actually played dirty politics with each other over it.
Speaker 3: Were you gonna jump in there, dude, Sorry, I'm gonna
Speaker 3: step on you.
Speaker 1: But me no, I was just saying, yeah, true.
Speaker 3: I thought ruckets were gonna jump in there for a
Speaker 3: sec all right, Uh, let's see here. So yeah, Kamala Harris,
Speaker 3: good luck. We had the FBI files. And oh, here's
Speaker 3: the link on the one we were talking about earlier,
Speaker 3: which you'll find on the show page for tonight's show.
Speaker 3: Jeffrey Epstein client list among files to release by Trump's
Speaker 3: task force. So this isn't to do with doge per se.
Speaker 3: This is the task force with the declassification of federal secrets.
Speaker 3: I guess that's the official name. So that's what Anna
Speaker 3: Paulina Luna, she's the one that changed her name, right,
Speaker 3: staunch political zionist that changed her name. If I recall anyways,
Speaker 3: she's gonna be okay. So nine to eleven's on the
Speaker 3: list too. Nine to eleven the assassination of JFK and
Speaker 3: UFO cited.
Speaker 5: Ufos's she didn't get the memo she meant to say UAP.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, that's almost like not socially acceptable to say
Speaker 3: UFO anymore. Huh. At least they want us to think that.
Speaker 5: It'd be neat if they could combine all of those
Speaker 5: things into one new report, Like well, if the aliens
Speaker 5: killed JFK because.
Speaker 3: Jeffrey Epstein blackmailed them into doing it. Yes, all right,
Speaker 3: so from.
Speaker 5: The client list, ohis Lamb the little gray alien that
Speaker 5: the satanic dude used to talk to?
Speaker 3: Yeah, all right, we'll put that on the show page
Speaker 3: if you want to dig into that any further.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it wasn't that. Who was that? It was Alistair Crowley? Right,
Speaker 5: he he did that? Yeah, la Am looked like, yes, sir,
Speaker 5: that's the.
Speaker 6: One in Antarctica with the enough one freaking whatever has
Speaker 6: you said earlier?
Speaker 5: And they traveled through the Hollow Earth to settle in Greenland.
Speaker 3: Right, maybe Greenland's where the stargate actually is. You know,
Speaker 3: they got to go through the hollow Earth to come
Speaker 3: out of the you know, magical troll hole in Greenland
Speaker 3: where the stargate blasts you to Mars, you and your
Speaker 3: companion robot. I am a little intrigued about this idea
Speaker 3: of sending the robots to Mars though, like that sounds
Speaker 3: a lot better than sending the people there. I don't
Speaker 3: know if people survived that van Allen radiation belt. So
Speaker 3: maybe you send your little robots up there and they
Speaker 3: can have DJ parties and stuff. Tell us how it.
Speaker 4: Is, so why do tomors?
Speaker 3: Yeah, so the robots don't get abused by by thug
Speaker 3: people in their apartments. I guess, I guess We're gonna
Speaker 3: create robots and then create a problem there and have
Speaker 3: to create a space travel to save the robots. What
Speaker 3: could go wrong?
Speaker 5: Sending humans to Mars is going to be so like
Speaker 5: the plot of the Running Game. Everyone's going to think,
Speaker 5: these people went to Mars and they've just been silently
Speaker 5: murdered somewhere.
Speaker 3: All right, Yeah, like, how do we trust that? We
Speaker 3: can't trust the news that comes to us here on Earth,
Speaker 3: how would we trust the news from Mars? Are you
Speaker 3: kidding me?
Speaker 4: Come on, We're just gonna take all the dissidance and
Speaker 4: send them tomorrows.
Speaker 3: Mars will be like the new Australia, Yeah, the new
Speaker 3: Guantanamo Bay, Gitmo, the Dark Side of the Moon. Yeah,
Speaker 3: no kidding. Yeah, And then everybody gets there and discovers that, uh,
Speaker 3: the Nazis, the Nazis zombies that you thought were on
Speaker 3: the Dark Side of the Moon are actually at Mars.
Speaker 3: And and you don't make it for fast, go do
Speaker 3: not collect two hundred spacebox? All right, what's this? Okay?
Speaker 3: We got another one. Oh okay, yeah, this is interesting
Speaker 3: related to what we've been talking about.
Speaker 5: So, yeah, I have a few stories, but some of
Speaker 5: the good news that's come out of all this, this
Speaker 5: is one of them.
Speaker 3: All right, Yes, out of zero hedge dot com. Microsoft
Speaker 3: drops us AID funded NewsGuard after Ted Cruz starts digging.
Speaker 3: Microsoft has dropped NewsGuard, a left wing fact checking organization
Speaker 3: they partnered with that has helped the advertising industry justify
Speaker 3: blacklists for independent conservative media sites such as zero Hedge.
Speaker 5: Yes, what does an independent conservative media mean?
Speaker 7: Now?
Speaker 3: I don't know. I think it means those of us
Speaker 3: that were not welcome on Twitter.
Speaker 5: We are the media?
Speaker 3: Now are the media? Yeah? That's right. So the move
Speaker 3: came after Senator Ted Cruz from right here in Texas
Speaker 3: began investigating Microsoft for funding the online quote unquote media
Speaker 3: literacy censorship tool created by NewsGuard to help guide quote
Speaker 3: unquote learners of all ages through the overwhelming landscape of
Speaker 3: online news and information. G Thanks NewsGuard. Now we come
Speaker 3: to find out that NewsGuard was funded by us AID.
Speaker 3: In January of twenty twenty five, we learned that NewsGuard
Speaker 3: received nearly three quarter million dollars from the DoD courtesy
Speaker 3: of usaid in response that was tweeted out by who,
Speaker 3: Tim Sharp or Sarah Comer there in the article there
Speaker 3: in response to Cruise Stop Bouncing, Microsoft claims their support
Speaker 3: for NewsGuard was limited to a one time donation in
Speaker 3: twenty eight Yeah right, and said it had asked NewsGuard
Speaker 3: to remove acclaim on its website that read Newsguard's media
Speaker 3: literacy programs are made possible thanks to general support from Microsoft.
Speaker 3: Uh yeah, so NewsGuard has just three years.
Speaker 5: It would have been proud to have that on their website, right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, no kidding, no kidding. So NewsGuard has since removed
Speaker 3: and he mentioned in Microsoft from their website. Yeah good, good.
Speaker 3: You know we just had that case. Was that a
Speaker 3: year ago or less? I can't remember where Facebook was
Speaker 3: in court and they had to admit that fact checkers
Speaker 3: were just people with opinions. Huh interesting because what were
Speaker 3: we people with opinions?
Speaker 5: He didn't shut down the world. He he just gave
Speaker 5: advice and you guys decided to take it.
Speaker 3: It's you and we gave our opinions about it, and
Speaker 3: we were shadow bands, so opinion, So I just you know,
Speaker 3: the opinion on the opinion of validity scale fact checkers
Speaker 3: are garbage, They are pointless, They are no better than
Speaker 3: uh well, they're worse. They're worse than all of us.
Speaker 6: And because they get some official label slapped on them,
Speaker 6: but it it could be anybody.
Speaker 7: Literally.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's like saying federal reserve. Is it federal? Is
Speaker 3: there a reserve?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 3: And no, it's just a freaking name. And they tried
Speaker 3: to do the same thing with their their whole uh
Speaker 3: grotesque Mary Poppins want to be in the disinformation board.
Speaker 3: So yeah, that's great, that's that is a that is
Speaker 3: a win. I wish Mark Anderson was here for that one.
Speaker 3: That's pretty cool. And then we've got this one. What
Speaker 3: do you think about that, infidel? I don't think you
Speaker 3: wait in there, mystical mister mysticle Pharaoh, glad to see
Speaker 3: Microsoft have to disengage from those ghouls over there at
Speaker 3: fact check.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean it's it's it's good that I guess
Speaker 4: Corporate America is losing their cape of BS nonsense.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, it's crazy, dude to think like there
Speaker 3: was a long period of time there where you know,
Speaker 3: all this fact checking stuff came out, like it basically
Speaker 3: came around the time that that Trump hit the stage
Speaker 3: and the the media reacted the way that they did
Speaker 3: to him back in what fifteen or whatever. Yeah, all
Speaker 3: of a sudden we had to have fact checks. Like
Speaker 3: there was never it wasn't even a concept, you know
Speaker 3: what I mean, Like you just knew you need need
Speaker 3: to be savvy on the internet, and all of a
Speaker 3: sudden it was like, oh, well we got to fact
Speaker 3: check this. And then it just turned into this crazy
Speaker 3: like back and forth between fake news and fact checking dialectics.
Speaker 6: You know where I see coordination on these guys. I
Speaker 6: don't know if you remember this, Say what you want
Speaker 6: about Alex Jones.
Speaker 7: Take him or leave him or some things. Yes, some things,
Speaker 7: know a lot of things, maybe whatever.
Speaker 6: But I specifically remember before Trump, when it was Hillary
Speaker 6: versus Trump, before he was in the first time her specifically,
Speaker 6: she always seems like she's her talking points are coordinated
Speaker 6: with the swamp, the deep state behind the on a
Speaker 6: lot of stuff she would say like she would be
Speaker 6: like the first one that got to like hit the
Speaker 6: first domino on a lot of things she did with
Speaker 6: Trump and Russian the collusion, She literally dropped that initially,
Speaker 6: first time I ever heard it, before it got any.
Speaker 7: Win months later was on a debate against him.
Speaker 1: But similarly, she's just.
Speaker 7: Out of nowhere, just went on Alex Jones.
Speaker 6: And conspiracy conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones, right, so she
Speaker 6: was like all up in that like before it was cool.
Speaker 6: And then whom the armada came in news media like
Speaker 6: following like the pie pipe or just following her lead
Speaker 6: with all.
Speaker 1: That way back when.
Speaker 6: And yeah, I mean when I think about when I
Speaker 6: started really gaining teeth, I think it might have been
Speaker 6: there like before that, like really gaining traction went in
Speaker 6: line memory anyway, little chillery.
Speaker 3: It's interesting how so many narratives are are you can
Speaker 3: see her and those in her orbit, Like, it's rare
Speaker 3: that you see people in a position of verifiable position,
Speaker 3: you know, seemingly verifiable position through open source information, that
Speaker 3: have the ability to actually set some of these narratives.
Speaker 3: You know, it feels like it just comes from the
Speaker 3: news media, right if you're not really paying attention. But
Speaker 3: then when you start breaking some of the narratives or
Speaker 3: realize that they're actually political slash military slash corporate slash
Speaker 3: globalist propaganda, right, brainwashing, and then you can start you know,
Speaker 3: tracking and tracing it a little bit, and it's like,
Speaker 3: you know, it's rare you find yourself like with someone
Speaker 3: like that where it's like, oh wow, that that's a
Speaker 3: nexus point to certain narratives that you know, became sort
Speaker 3: of a reality or a fake reality. You know, that's
Speaker 3: held up for as long as they're politically expedient.
Speaker 7: Right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it just has coordination written all over it, you know.
Speaker 1: And it's one of those things, right, I mean where
Speaker 1: you don't you don't have to be.
Speaker 6: In some sort of some sort of fly on the
Speaker 6: wall or have some sort of secret squirrel sort of
Speaker 6: rig set up where you hear all these conversations going
Speaker 6: on smoke filled rooms or hallways and hutch tones, you know,
Speaker 6: somewhere in the deep sweat state or some subterranean CIA
Speaker 6: complex or something like that.
Speaker 1: You don't.
Speaker 6: You don't have You could just from a distance, if
Speaker 6: you just sort of like detached from having your your
Speaker 6: face and the details or some hot button issue, if
Speaker 6: you just back up and look at it. I don't know,
Speaker 6: I could be crazy, I could be randy. You're nuts,
Speaker 6: all right, cool? But to me it looks obvious. Is
Speaker 6: anything to anyone paying attention that doesn't have some sort
Speaker 6: of you know, disorder where they can't follow multiple streams
Speaker 6: of thought all at once. And you just put a
Speaker 6: little time into it and you don't even need to
Speaker 6: have any stake in it, just like observed, watch and
Speaker 6: it'll and it's it's.
Speaker 1: Right there in front of everybody.
Speaker 6: This this coordinated swamp deep state stuff like with our
Speaker 6: gal chillery.
Speaker 3: Yeah right, well, let's see, Ruckus just dropped us this
Speaker 3: one here. President Trump cuts off funding for the National
Speaker 3: Endowment for Democracy. Check this out. That's ne e D.
Speaker 3: Is another another one that we have criticized bigly here
Speaker 3: in the boiler room over the years, and this is
Speaker 3: out a big league politics. Shane Treo here responsible for
Speaker 3: this one. And the byline is the National Endowment for
Speaker 3: Democracy is a CIA front group engaged in regime change
Speaker 3: operations abroad. Yeah, that's a great byeline. I love it.
Speaker 3: I love it, Shane. That's very poignantly said. This is
Speaker 3: what we've been getting at like for so long. These
Speaker 3: NGOs are not NGOs. Some of them, maybe some of
Speaker 3: them may have aspects to them, or maybe even the
Speaker 3: majority of the aspects of them could be good. But
Speaker 3: if there's stuff like this happening in the background. The
Speaker 3: public needs to know about it. It needs to stop,
Speaker 3: it needs to be made public, and people need to
Speaker 3: be held responsible for anything that was done wrong. So
Speaker 3: here's what it's what he wrote again at Big League
Speaker 3: Politics substack there for Shane Treo. President Donald Trump is
Speaker 3: cut off funding for the National Endowment for Democracy and ED,
Speaker 3: a CIA front group that destabilizes regimes across the world.
Speaker 3: The Free Press reported that anyd's funding has been suspended
Speaker 3: per an order sent from Elon Musk Department of Government
Speaker 3: Efficiency to the US Treasury, which will cripple the organization's
Speaker 3: budget to conduct subversive activities. The report indicates that NEYD
Speaker 3: received an astonishing three hundred and fifteen million dollars from
Speaker 3: the US government during the most recent fiscal year. The
Speaker 3: ned's dole has now dried up and the bureaucrats are
Speaker 3: freaking out as a result. Dude, three hundred and fifteen
Speaker 3: million dollars in one year. People of Lahina, attention, people
Speaker 3: of North Carolina, attention, people of East Palestine, attention. People
Speaker 3: living a life on the streets, attention. This is the
Speaker 3: kind of money that your government will spend in one
Speaker 3: year to a fake organization, a cutout organization to do
Speaker 3: regime change in other countries. That's just one year. I
Speaker 3: would like to know, what is ten years of any
Speaker 3: defunding look like? What's twenty years of any defunding? Look like?
Speaker 3: Where did all the money go? Where are the emails
Speaker 3: and memos that lead to the memorandums that lead to
Speaker 3: the Comptroller at sending money from the Pentagon to ned
Speaker 3: who's involved in these chains? What was done with the money?
Speaker 3: We would like to know. That's taxpayer dollars. They offered
Speaker 3: seven hundred dollars to the people that survived the Lahina fire,
Speaker 3: and they didn't tell us how many people died in it.
Speaker 3: They didn't let those people back on their property. Last
Speaker 3: I heard, they still weren't on their property. But we've
Speaker 3: got just endless buckets of money to give to endless
Speaker 3: NGOs to commit what some people would say are endless
Speaker 3: crimes against humanity all over the world, Like what the
Speaker 3: what the fuck is that?
Speaker 7: So yeah, I'm looking at their website, man, and it's it's.
Speaker 6: It's it's a baby us A AID basically.
Speaker 7: Just not directly attached.
Speaker 6: To the government, I guess right, But it has a
Speaker 6: pretty official sounding name sound official, right, like the Federal
Speaker 6: Reserve or whatever National Endowment for Democracy with the name
Speaker 6: like that.
Speaker 7: It's gotta be good, right, Sign me up.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Well, here it gets better. There's here's a little
Speaker 3: let me continue a little bit. It's been a blood
Speaker 3: bath quote unquote, and any D staffers said to Free Press, quote,
Speaker 3: we have not been able to meet payroll and pay
Speaker 3: basic overhead expenses end quote. The Center for Renewing America,
Speaker 3: a think tank held by Trump's Office of Management and
Speaker 3: Budget director Russell Voight, connected any of these actions to
Speaker 3: the genesis of the Russia Ukraine War in an analysis. Quote,
Speaker 3: A steady stream of any D grants to myriad Ukrainian
Speaker 3: political entities and movements advanced both the Orange Revolution and
Speaker 3: the Madan Revolution that paved the way for the current
Speaker 3: Ukraine Russia war end quote. That's what the analysis said. So,
Speaker 3: and that's what we've been pointing out forever. You know,
Speaker 3: I remember Patrick Henningson talking about this in twenty fourteen,
Speaker 3: eleven years ago. That was when I got interested in that,
Speaker 3: and that was one of the eye opening moments about
Speaker 3: NGOs and how they're used. Jim Bouvard wrote an article
Speaker 3: with the Libertarian Institute, chronicling the misdeeds of the NED
Speaker 3: throughout their sordid history. Bouvard noted that the NED attempted
Speaker 3: to orchestrate a coup against socialist dictator Hugo Chavez in
Speaker 3: Venezuela in the early two thousands. The attempted coup failed
Speaker 3: and only strengthened Chavez's grip on power, as he used
Speaker 3: the failed coup to convince his people he was standing
Speaker 3: against foreigners attempting to destroy the sovereignty of a nation.
Speaker 3: Bouvard stated in a two thousand and nine article for
Speaker 3: the Future of Freedom Foundation that a NED is quote
Speaker 3: based on the notion that it's meddling in foreign elections,
Speaker 3: is automatically pro democracy because the US government is the
Speaker 3: incarnation of democracy. NED has always operated on the principle
Speaker 3: that what's good for the US government is good for
Speaker 3: democracy end quote. Really, how's that work now for everybody?
Speaker 3: How does that working?
Speaker 1: Look? Like?
Speaker 5: They're basically understand what they mean every time they talk
Speaker 5: about our democracy.
Speaker 3: Now, that's what it means. It means whatever the ruling
Speaker 3: class in America wants, whatever the CIA wants, whatever who
Speaker 3: controls the CIA wants. So there you go and it ends.
Speaker 3: I'll just I'll just finish it out. It ends with
Speaker 3: In recent years, ANYD has become quote a top funder
Speaker 3: of the worldwide censorship industrial complex end quote, according to Bouvard,
Speaker 3: with any D arguing that worldwide big brother censorship is
Speaker 3: necessary to protect democracy. There they are again. They see that.
Speaker 3: They turn it against us, the American people right there,
Speaker 3: because that democracy has nothing to do with you or
Speaker 3: me or our founding documents, our constitutional rights, our human rights,
Speaker 3: nothing nothing.
Speaker 5: Nor our constitutional republic.
Speaker 3: No, no, no, yep. First and foremost, the Trump administration has
Speaker 3: correctly identified any D as one of the most insidious
Speaker 3: and destructive government funded programs on the books. So there
Speaker 3: you go. If you were afraid that USAID was going
Speaker 3: to be the sacrificial lamb, we got more lambs come
Speaker 3: into the slaughter here. So it's funny too, because I
Speaker 3: think about I heard that over at Politico. People weren't
Speaker 3: getting their paychecks as soon as USAID shut down. So
Speaker 3: there's like speculation that you know, there are news outlets
Speaker 3: that are you know, immediately you know what I mean,
Speaker 3: Like like they're saying here in this article too, like
Speaker 3: paychecks are not going through the second this thing is
Speaker 3: shut down. I think that's just glorious and hilarious. Like,
Speaker 3: how many crap news rags out there are infidel mystical farah?
Speaker 3: What do you think all these crap news like we've
Speaker 3: seen this with you know a lot of news sites
Speaker 3: that have you know, we were told we're big but
Speaker 3: turned out they failed. It looks like we might see
Speaker 3: a slew of them now.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I think I think we're going to see more
Speaker 4: on one of those guys. But guys, I gotta I
Speaker 4: gotta jump out though.
Speaker 3: All Right, dude, thanks for being here with us tonight.
Speaker 3: We'll look forward to having you on again next week. Dude,
Speaker 3: have a great rest of the weekend and we'll talk
Speaker 3: to you soon. Maybe you do a magic carpet drive
Speaker 3: for us on Saturday, that's my plan.
Speaker 4: I'll see you guys on Saturday.
Speaker 3: All right, thanks thanks to there he goes that's a
Speaker 3: mystical I almost said infidel pharaoh. It's mystical pharaoh.
Speaker 5: Whoops, I just sent you here in the private chat
Speaker 5: hasher a link to back up what you said about Politico.
Speaker 3: Excellent, Thank you. Okay, let's throw this up there real quick.
Speaker 3: Get that on the show notes for everybody off of
Speaker 3: the deep dive here. Politico's payroll mishap shines light on
Speaker 3: USAID ties. Employees at Politico caught by surprise when their
Speaker 3: paychecks failed to arrive for the latest pay period. According
Speaker 3: to internal email share of the staff, company leadership pointed
Speaker 3: to a technical error quote unquote in the payroll system
Speaker 3: and promised to resolve the issue promptly within.
Speaker 5: Twenty four in Sri Lanka.
Speaker 3: Yeah right. Within roughly twenty four hours, staff reported that
Speaker 3: pay had been dispersed, but not before speculation emerged on
Speaker 3: the social media on what might have transpired. Politico is
Speaker 3: owned by Germany based AXL Springer S, the global media
Speaker 3: holding company that was once publicly traded but is now
Speaker 3: privately held. The firm's flagship publications and digital ventures are
Speaker 3: predominantly European, although it's twenty twenty one acquisition of Politico
Speaker 3: significantly expanded its US market footprint. This made the situa
Speaker 3: the situation that, despite being headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, politico
Speaker 3: strategic and financial decisions can be influenced by its foreign parent.
Speaker 3: So look, they've got they've got a receipt for US
Speaker 3: here as rumors swirled about the payroll disruption, Critics began
Speaker 3: highlighting Politicos substantial funding from you got It, USAID. Public records,
Speaker 3: including those found on USA spending dot gov, showed that
Speaker 3: Politico LLC has received millions of dollars from usai D,
Speaker 3: with the flow of federal awards ramping up significantly over
Speaker 3: the past few years. Shocking not exact figures indicate that
Speaker 3: over two hundred transactions from various federal programs contributed to
Speaker 3: Politico's government related revenue. So there you go, there's your receipt.
Speaker 3: We'll link it on the show.
Speaker 5: And this is one of those ones where it's like
Speaker 5: there's no proof that they really did, but you know.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, they've got a one receipt here
Speaker 3: for eight point two million dollar dollars. That's a lot
Speaker 3: of money. It's a lot of money. None of the
Speaker 3: people that I know doing actual media and actual journalism
Speaker 3: are getting anything but you know, tax bills and indictments
Speaker 3: and set like that from the government. Nobody's getting eight
Speaker 3: point two million dollars to do anything that they're doing that,
Speaker 3: I know. Goodness gracious, all right.
Speaker 5: Now, that's to eight million dollars it's not like the
Speaker 5: billions of dollars for Operation Stargate, I get it, the
Speaker 5: millions of dollars. There's still a lot of effing money.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And it's like all those transactions, Like we saw
Speaker 3: that three hundred and fifteen million dollar number on one
Speaker 3: of them that was for one year, Like what is
Speaker 3: it over you know, ten years? I mean, we've talked
Speaker 3: about how much taxpayer money goes into PBS, the public
Speaker 3: broadcasting channels over the years. It's like a quarter of
Speaker 3: their budgets, like twenty five percent, or at least it
Speaker 3: was last I looked.
Speaker 5: The thing is, if you take all of this above board,
Speaker 5: who gets blamed for doing these things? Like sure, like
Speaker 5: one of these was thanks to Doge. One of these
Speaker 5: that we talked about was thanks to Ted Cruz shining
Speaker 5: a light on it. But at the end of the day,
Speaker 5: this is Trump, right, It's all Trump did this right.
Speaker 5: So Trump is making some very powerful enemies that historically speaking,
Speaker 5: don't don't wind up doing so well for presidents. We
Speaker 5: did mention the JFK thing, didn't We Every single conspiracy
Speaker 5: theory related to how and why he was assassinated has
Speaker 5: to do with him exposing some form of corruption, picking
Speaker 5: a fight with the wrong people, And here he's got
Speaker 5: Trump picking a fight with literally a CIA cutout, I mean,
Speaker 5: and then then I just dropped this. Now he's running
Speaker 5: around saying this is a big no no. I'm like, well,
Speaker 5: how is he getting away with this?
Speaker 2: Like?
Speaker 5: What is happening here?
Speaker 6: Now?
Speaker 5: He's going to cut the mill military budget? Yeah, I'll
Speaker 5: hold the phone here. I'm all for that, but I'm
Speaker 5: very very concerned for his well being.
Speaker 3: Now, yeah, exactly. So the source for this one is
Speaker 3: off anti war dot com. Great anti war dot com,
Speaker 3: good website. Make sure it's in your regular rotation. And
Speaker 3: this by Dave to Camp. Dave's awesome Trump military spending
Speaker 3: could be cut in half and there's no reason to
Speaker 3: build new nuclear weapons. Well, yeah, absolutely, I mean that's
Speaker 3: the kind of thing people want to hear. I hope.
Speaker 3: The President said he wants to have a global conference
Speaker 3: with Russia and China to discuss cutting military spending. President
Speaker 3: Tump told reporters on Thursday that he believes US military
Speaker 3: spending could eventually be cut in half and that he
Speaker 3: wants to pursue the idea as part of an agreement
Speaker 3: with Russia and China. He also said there was no
Speaker 3: reason to build new nuclear weapons. Quote, at some point,
Speaker 3: when things settle down, I'm going to meet with China
Speaker 3: and I'm going to meet with Russia in particular those two,
Speaker 3: and I'm going to say there's no reason for us
Speaker 3: to be spending almost a trillion dollars on the military,
Speaker 3: and I'm going to say we can spend this on
Speaker 3: other things when we straighten it all out. And one
Speaker 3: of the first meetings I want to have is with
Speaker 3: President g of China and President Putin of Russia, and
Speaker 3: I want to say, let's cut our military budget in half,
Speaker 3: and we can do that, and I think we'll be
Speaker 3: able to do that. Is he is he just talking
Speaker 3: about ours? Or does he expect them to cut theirs
Speaker 3: in half? Because there's this like like orders of magnitude
Speaker 3: less than ours. I mean, we cut ours in half,
Speaker 3: it's still like multiple times what Russia's is this.
Speaker 5: This makes perfect sense to me because I've been following
Speaker 5: the AI replacing everybody and everything. It turns out that
Speaker 5: that shit is cheaper. So I'm just saying, hey, if
Speaker 5: we start offloading a lot of the AI to run
Speaker 5: the military stuff, we could say this shit, we could
Speaker 5: easily cut the budget in half and we don't have
Speaker 5: to sacrifice any of the things, you know what I mean.
Speaker 5: And who knows, we got quantum computing coming up. Maybe
Speaker 5: maybe they got some super doomsday weapon that's going to
Speaker 5: outshine nuclear weapons or just pointless like, so, who I mean,
Speaker 5: what does this mean. There's no way he means that
Speaker 5: we're just gonna cut the legs out from under the military,
Speaker 5: because the military industrial complex still rules the roost, if
Speaker 5: I'm correct me if I'm wrong here.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it could just be signaling a like a great reset,
Speaker 3: basically a great reset of what it means to be
Speaker 3: fighting a war, what it means to have a WMD.
Speaker 3: They're not going to be traditional ones that we're used to,
Speaker 3: you know, like drone swarms could be a way worse
Speaker 3: threat than a thermonuclear device, you know, like much cheaper, Yeah, exactly,
Speaker 3: and much without all the destruction, you know. So yeah,
Speaker 3: I like it though on its face. On its face,
Speaker 3: I'm down with no more nuclear weapons. I'm down with
Speaker 3: not having a trillion dollar budget for the military.
Speaker 5: Also, his reason for there's no reason to build a
Speaker 5: brand new nuclear weapons he did not he was going
Speaker 5: to get rid of the ones that we have, he said,
Speaker 5: and I quote, we already have so many you could
Speaker 5: destroy the world fifty times or one hundred times over.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well it sounds logical to me. I mean, yeah,
Speaker 3: we've we've got that capability, so that unlock has been
Speaker 3: earned by modernity. Let's maybe we'll move on to AI
Speaker 3: drone swarms and terminator bots that can DJA a party
Speaker 3: after they do what they do.
Speaker 5: Yeah, all right, I think, Randy, what's that? What do
Speaker 5: you think about the military budget being cut in half?
Speaker 7: I don't know half or or sixty.
Speaker 6: It could definitely be cut. And I know there's a
Speaker 6: lot of people that are like, you know, hey, you know, USA, USA,
Speaker 6: what are you going to cut the military for? And
Speaker 6: all that you can cut the military significantly without damaging
Speaker 6: you know, someone that like you know, signed their name
Speaker 6: on the contract and you know, affecting their training or
Speaker 6: putting them at risk because there's so much.
Speaker 3: You didn't have to fire anyone, dude, right, like you
Speaker 3: could starry to interrupt you, man, I want you to continue.
Speaker 3: But it seems to me like like if you just
Speaker 3: fixed the the contracting departments and you know, cleaned up
Speaker 3: some of the red tape and made bidding you know
Speaker 3: actually open. Uh that in and of itself could have
Speaker 3: the just the overhead of it all.
Speaker 6: Right, they they overpay for for everything.
Speaker 7: The contracting thing is a total it's to use a
Speaker 7: British term that I hear sometimes.
Speaker 6: It's absolutely shambolic, like it's just off the charts, like
Speaker 6: what they'll what they'll put under the d D budget,
Speaker 6: but that they basically outsourced, and you know, it's it
Speaker 6: gets signed a lot because a lot of politicians it's
Speaker 6: like a sort of a top cover thing where they
Speaker 6: could be like, hey, it's for the troops, or hey
Speaker 6: it's for you know, national security, do you dare you
Speaker 6: know question? Or men and servicemen and service women or
Speaker 6: or you know, putting.
Speaker 1: Lives at risk.
Speaker 6: Sure that's that's there, but there's like an operational risk
Speaker 6: and there's like actual training that happens. And then there's okay,
Speaker 6: what about the other billions that go to you know,
Speaker 6: something that could probably made at a third of that price,
Speaker 6: But there's just so much right, and then the contracts
Speaker 6: take so long and they need extensions and.
Speaker 7: They take years ago.
Speaker 6: I don't know what did that joint strapped Joint Strikeforce
Speaker 6: Fighter take like oh years and decades or something.
Speaker 1: It's just Lord.
Speaker 3: Will schedule and over budget still to this day, behind schedule,
Speaker 3: over budget, and like marginal results when they go bad.
Speaker 6: Yeah, So to streamline and make something like that efficient,
Speaker 6: you don't even need to scrap the program, just do
Speaker 6: it correctly or make a better product or whatever could save.
Speaker 1: You know, billions. And that's just one thing that we
Speaker 1: brought right.
Speaker 6: But but they it's like kids, you know, with free
Speaker 6: access to the candy store.
Speaker 7: They just can't help themselves.
Speaker 3: So yeah, yeah, dude, well said. Here's here's a comment
Speaker 3: from the discord that I think will ring through to
Speaker 3: a lot of people, especially considering everything that we already
Speaker 3: talked about tonight, you know, with you know, using NGOs
Speaker 3: to cause regime change and interfere in elections in foreign countries,
Speaker 3: Like how's all that? How's all that working out for everybody?
Speaker 3: How's the you know, how's how's that for geopolitics? But
Speaker 3: Fleety shout out to Fleety in our chat, says in
Speaker 3: our discord chat, if you're not in our discord, you
Speaker 3: join it. If you aren't operating all of those six
Speaker 3: hundred and seventy bases in other countries, you could probably
Speaker 3: save a bit. Ah uh huh, well said Fleety, thank you,
Speaker 3: thank you for that.
Speaker 5: That's not must higher Fleety now.
Speaker 3: And yeah, yeah exactly. I mean big Balls is a
Speaker 3: cutout in anyways, right, you should just hire Fleety and
Speaker 3: put him in the big Balls seat, because that's that's
Speaker 3: what I'm talking about, right there. Let's knock this shit off.
Speaker 3: Let's knock off all the color revolutions and let people
Speaker 3: figure it out. Stop taking American tax payer dollars and
Speaker 3: doing color revolutions. Please abroad and at home, guys, guys,
Speaker 3: are you listening out there? That's what we would all like.
Speaker 3: I think we can all agree on this. I mean,
Speaker 3: I hope. I don't know. Maybe people like seeing their
Speaker 3: tax dollars go to some fucking foreign country they've never
Speaker 3: heard of before and being used to do cultural engineering
Speaker 3: and war and regime change and disrupt elections. I mean,
Speaker 3: maybe there's someone out there. I've never met that person
Speaker 3: that thinks this is a good idea. I've met people
Speaker 3: that just trust, you know, trust all aspects of the institution.
Speaker 3: But those people are becoming more and more rare, so
Speaker 3: you know, sorry, to that shrinking demographic. All right, what
Speaker 3: do we got? I see something in the chat here?
Speaker 3: What is this bloat?
Speaker 5: Yeah? The hits just keep coming. The new guy just
Speaker 5: discovered what was going on under the previous admin.
Speaker 3: Oh all right, okay, yeah.
Speaker 5: It's it's like a two minute video. You can just
Speaker 5: play the video.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we'll let this one speak for itself.
Speaker 5: Like Leezelden, Right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, leez Elden. All right, okay, And leez Elden has
Speaker 3: been appointed as I forget what his title is, but
Speaker 3: he's got one in the cabinet.
Speaker 14: Hi, this is EPA Administrator Leezelden. One of my very
Speaker 14: top priorities at EPA is to be an excellent steward
Speaker 14: of your hard earned tax dollars. There will be zero
Speaker 14: tolerance of any waste and abuse. An extremely disturbing video
Speaker 14: circulated two months ago featuring a Biden EPA political appointee.
Speaker 3: I'm gonna pause for a second. Yeah it sounds fine
Speaker 3: over here, but I don't know. We're having some weird
Speaker 3: audio glitches tonight. There was one clip I didn't hear
Speaker 3: at all that you were here, and so I don't
Speaker 3: even know if that went over the air or not.
Speaker 3: But I'm motion gonna let it run. Hopefully I'll try
Speaker 3: to clean it up afterwards if it doesn't come out yet.
Speaker 14: Talking about how they were tossing gold bars off the Titanic,
Speaker 14: rushing to get billions of your tax dollars out the
Speaker 14: door before Inauguration Day, the gold bars were tax dollars,
Speaker 14: and tossing them off the Titanic meant the Biden administration
Speaker 14: knew they were wasting it. Following this revelation during my
Speaker 14: meetings with members of Congress, I made a very important
Speaker 14: commitment to them and to the American people, which I
Speaker 14: reiterated at my confirmation hearing that if confirmed, I would
Speaker 14: immediately get a full accounting. Fortunately, my awesome team at
Speaker 14: EPA has found the gold bars. Shockingly, roughly twenty billion
Speaker 14: of your tax dollars were parked at an outside financial
Speaker 14: institution by the Biden EPA. This scheme was the first
Speaker 14: of its kind in EPA history, and it was purposefully
Speaker 14: designed to obligate all of the money in a rush
Speaker 14: job with reduced oversight. Even further, this pot of twenty
Speaker 14: billion dollars was awarded to just eight entities that were
Speaker 14: then responsible for doling out your money to NGOs and
Speaker 14: others at their discretion with far less transparency. Just under
Speaker 14: seven billion dollars was sent to one entity called the
Speaker 14: Climate United Fund. I'm sure you and I now have
Speaker 14: some of the same questions. How do these organizations decide
Speaker 14: how to allocate funding? How much money have they given
Speaker 14: out so far? Into whom? Are there any former Biden
Speaker 14: EPA staffers who are now working at these entities. Let
Speaker 14: me make one thing abundantly clear. At this point, there
Speaker 14: is zero reason to suspect any wrongdoing by the bank.
Speaker 14: Here's my position as EPA administrator. The financial agent agreement
Speaker 14: with the bank needs to be instantly terminated, and the
Speaker 14: bank must immediately return all of the gold bars that
Speaker 14: the Biden administration tossed off the Titanic. EPA needs to
Speaker 14: reassume responsibility for all of these funds. We will review
Speaker 14: every penny that has gone out the door. I will
Speaker 14: be referring this matter to the Inspector General's Office and
Speaker 14: will work with the Justice Department as well. The days
Speaker 14: of irresponsibly shoveling boatloads of cash to far left activist
Speaker 14: groups in the name of environmental justice and climate equity
Speaker 14: are over. The American public deserves a more transparent and
Speaker 14: accountable government than what transpired these past four years. We
Speaker 14: take our obligations under the law as seriously as it gets.
Speaker 14: I've directed my team to find your gold bars, and
Speaker 14: they found them. Now we will get them back inside
Speaker 14: of control of government as we pursue next steps. As
Speaker 14: President Trump has vowed, we are going to usher in
Speaker 14: a new golden age of American success for the citizens
Speaker 14: of every race, religion, color, and creed.
Speaker 3: All right, Randy J, if you're still with us, I'll
Speaker 3: take any comments you have. I know you got a bounce,
Speaker 3: or you can just say I gotta go by and
Speaker 3: he has already bounced. So thanks for being here with
Speaker 3: us tonight, Randy Jay. That was great. Yeah, another infuriating
Speaker 3: amount of money there. Thirty billion dollars.
Speaker 5: Wow, twenty twenty billion dollars? What was ten billion? I
Speaker 5: mean different? Yeah, twenty to thirty what the hell? Still
Speaker 5: an insanely high number of money. Again, not the five
Speaker 5: hundred billion dollars that were giving to Larry Ellison and
Speaker 5: Sam Altman for Project Stargate.
Speaker 3: No, we're told that's their own money, so they're gonna
Speaker 3: have to come up with that on their own. Okay,
Speaker 3: so we'll see how that works out, because he's not
Speaker 3: even worth that much. He's the fourth richest or second
Speaker 3: richest man and he's not even worth that much. So
Speaker 3: he's gonna have to bring a lot of friends to
Speaker 3: the party.
Speaker 5: Yeah, now you know who is worth a lot. Apparently
Speaker 5: we just found out Samantha Powers. Oh that was that
Speaker 5: was the big one with the USAID thing they discovered.
Speaker 5: Oh shit, that's kind of weird. She had an annual
Speaker 5: salary less than like a quarter of a million dollars,
Speaker 5: but her net worth went up to thirty million dollars.
Speaker 5: Nancy Pelosi, head of the us AID.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, let's let's do them all. Let's figure out
Speaker 3: how all their salaries got so big. I mean, we
Speaker 3: know in any case, Yeah, yeah, yeah, all right, let's
Speaker 3: see here. Fleety once again kicks in with an article
Speaker 3: here about what we were talking about. There. This out
Speaker 3: of Responsible Statecraft dot org. The F thirty five. This
Speaker 3: is an article from last year. F thirty five fighter
Speaker 3: will now cost more than two trillion dollars. The eye
Speaker 3: popping price tag has not fixed the maintenance issues plaguing
Speaker 3: the program, A government watchdogs says, so the F thirty
Speaker 3: five fighter jet program will cost taxpayers more than two trillion.
Speaker 3: We make that nice and big there, that text, nice
Speaker 3: and big so that you can see this nice and
Speaker 3: big number that we're paying two trillion over its lifetime,
Speaker 3: cementing its place as one of the most expensive weapons
Speaker 3: programs in US history, according to new estimates from the
Speaker 3: Government Accountability Office. So if you're don't like Elon Musk,
Speaker 3: you're thinking, ah, that's just more doge garbage. No, this
Speaker 3: is straight from the GAO.
Speaker 5: Which is a unless the US dead again, thirty something trillion,
Speaker 5: thirty six trillion.
Speaker 3: Yeah, thirty second counting. I mean it's you know, it's
Speaker 3: going up as we speak pretty fast, if.
Speaker 5: You like, are they going to start measuring the debt
Speaker 5: clock now in the number of f eighteens?
Speaker 11: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 3: The new price tag. The new price tag represents a
Speaker 3: dramatic jump from a twenty eighteen estimate that set the
Speaker 3: program's total cost at one point seven trillion. Most of
Speaker 3: the bump comes from projected sustainment costs, which increased by
Speaker 3: forty four percent to a cool one point five to
Speaker 3: eight trillion over the lifetime of the program. The Pentagon
Speaker 3: also extended the project life of the plane to twenty
Speaker 3: eighty eight rather than the previous goal of twenty seventy seven.
Speaker 5: So I misspoke on this.
Speaker 3: What's the third, right, Yeah, F thirty five.
Speaker 5: Got to lose track of these things, No, I know.
Speaker 3: So people they say that our two trillion dollar investment
Speaker 3: between whenever this program started and twenty eighty eight will
Speaker 3: be a worthy investment for US. I guess, I guess
Speaker 3: we're supposed to assume that that's a great two trillion
Speaker 3: to have mixed in with our current thirty six trillion
Speaker 3: in counting.
Speaker 5: We're protecting the monkeys in Sri Lanka?
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, are we? Yeah? Okay, I thought we'd protect
Speaker 3: the people from the monkeys, but I like your idea better.
Speaker 5: Got to save them from the companion boughts before it's
Speaker 5: too late.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the companion bought revolution is gonna be lit. It
Speaker 3: is gonna be lit for sure. Okay, here's this one.
Speaker 3: We talked about this. You can see this on YouTube.
Speaker 3: Elon and Xei or whatever his kid's name is in
Speaker 3: the Oval Office Dose investigating feds whose net worths have
Speaker 3: exploded loaded after Samantha Power bombshell, doge had Elon Musk
Speaker 3: said on Tuesday that dog is going to investigate federal
Speaker 3: employees whose net worths have exploded despite their comparatively low pay.
Speaker 3: The announcement, which came after President Trump signed an executive
Speaker 3: order calling on federal agencies to work with JOJ Doje,
Speaker 3: follows a bombshell report that Samantha Power, former head of
Speaker 3: us AID, saw her net worth explode to thirty million
Speaker 3: dollars despite an annual salary of under two hundred and
Speaker 3: fifty thousand dollars. So, yeah, I thought.
Speaker 5: She was getting stock investment tips from Nancy Pelosi.
Speaker 3: Yeah, really, Yeah, that's that's a deep, deep rabbit hole
Speaker 3: for big balls in the crew. Huh. All right, well
Speaker 3: I've exhausted. I've exhausted anything I had rockets. Do you
Speaker 3: got any more you want to throw in there?
Speaker 5: Oh, there's tons of these things. I mean, there's just their.
Speaker 3: Just keep coming speed.
Speaker 5: I know, insane. I don't know, there's just gonna the
Speaker 5: hits are just going to keep on coming. And well
Speaker 5: all the news outlets are covering it. That's what's weird too. Yeah,
Speaker 5: we don't have we don't have the it's very rarely.
Speaker 5: I mean they're still out there where they're like these
Speaker 5: hit pieces again like debunking or saying, oh no, this
Speaker 5: is just no, they're just NBC is just like yeah,
Speaker 5: so yeah, it looks like Samantha Powers made a lot
Speaker 5: more money than she should have. And Elon Musk's doing
Speaker 5: Elon Musk is bad. He's so bad. But yeah, and
Speaker 5: they just report the news because it's news, because it's
Speaker 5: really happening and it's just so so surreal.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and they don't go if they were doing their job,
Speaker 3: they'd like they wouldn't have had her on the news
Speaker 3: in the first place back in the day. But they
Speaker 3: could go through their own files and pick up like
Speaker 3: the archives of her speaking on their platform to their employees, uh,
Speaker 3: dishing out propaganda, you know. And it's like Jesus like
Speaker 3: side note, you know, oh yeah, there's some whatever, you know,
Speaker 3: some inefficiency blah blah blah. No, no, no, no, this needs
Speaker 3: to be a judical This needs to be understood, like
Speaker 3: these amounts of money. If there's that much money being
Speaker 3: squirreled away by the EPA, then every single organization was
Speaker 3: doing something similar and right now is probably quaking in
Speaker 3: their fucking boots.
Speaker 5: Yep. And and it's been politicized because we have to
Speaker 5: pretend like only one side of American politics does this
Speaker 5: and the other side as clean as a fucking whistle.
Speaker 3: Right, Well, I saw h never no way. You know,
Speaker 3: I've seen Mike Ben's running around talking about this a lot.
Speaker 3: He's sort of the big voice talking about it, and
Speaker 3: he's he's not wrong in what he's saying for the
Speaker 3: most part, but he's he's framing it as though it's
Speaker 3: just something that the Democrats and and Biden and Harris
Speaker 3: did almost I mean, at least that's the Maybe I
Speaker 3: haven't washed enough of it, but that's kind of the
Speaker 3: vibe I'm getting, is like I see this a lot
Speaker 3: where and it's like, wait a minute, these things have
Speaker 3: been going on for a long long time. Yes, there
Speaker 3: were particularly agreedious in the last four years, and that's
Speaker 3: coming to head. And I'm fine with, you know, going
Speaker 3: backwards in time. But I just wanted, you know, people
Speaker 3: to be caution cautious about accepting the politicization of it.
Speaker 3: You can accept the short term politicization of it if
Speaker 3: we get the receipts, but you need to stay open
Speaker 3: minded about the longer term collusion between the two sides.
Speaker 3: And you know from from whence all this comes above them?
Speaker 5: And then we have the wild child, not the not
Speaker 5: the wild child of the wild child, but the big
Speaker 5: wild child, the big boy, jumping up and down on
Speaker 5: the stage. Elon us, you're the news. Why why why
Speaker 5: does it take Elon Musk and his doge to do this?
Speaker 5: How come Trump couldn't have done this the last time
Speaker 5: he made America great again? The bloat and the waist
Speaker 5: and the fraud existed, then, didn't it? Did he bitch
Speaker 5: about it during his campaign? All this stuff? Was he
Speaker 5: going to start walking people up back then? No? No,
Speaker 5: we owe them a great big debt of gratitude.
Speaker 3: He said, yeah, yeah, well you know, you get another shot.
Speaker 3: You get another shot now. And we're impressed in many
Speaker 3: swim lanes here. So I will see how it goes.
Speaker 3: I want to see the audits. I want to see
Speaker 3: these these people held accountable, and I want to see
Speaker 3: it all happen in public. That would please me very much.
Speaker 3: So yeah, we shall see. But again back to that
Speaker 3: great rebranding.
Speaker 5: Also also, yeah, I was going to say the rebranding thing.
Speaker 5: So it's like, so even though Elon was was a
Speaker 5: loved the left, loved that guy before he bought Twitter, right,
Speaker 5: and then he bought Twitter and things started falling going
Speaker 5: downhill for that guy ever since then. But it's like,
Speaker 5: there's no there's no arguments about the fact that it
Speaker 5: would appear anyways. Again, this could just be all about
Speaker 5: keeping up appearances, But the left leaning media seems less
Speaker 5: concerned about the the exposure of all the fraud and
Speaker 5: the waste and the bloke. They're more concerned about who's
Speaker 5: doing it. They don't seem to give a shit the
Speaker 5: fact that these people were robbing tax players, taxpayers blind.
Speaker 5: They're more upset that ECM on Musk and Trump. Who's
Speaker 5: exposing it? Like what like so off it was somebody
Speaker 5: from your side, you guys would have been like, oh,
Speaker 5: thank god Biden exposed all the corruption that Biden was.
Speaker 3: Doing, right, I mean, this stuff was sitting right there
Speaker 3: in front of you guys's faces, and and you didn't
Speaker 3: say shit. In fact, you promoted a lot of these
Speaker 3: you know, propaganda narratives. So uh would be jealous. I mean,
Speaker 3: what's what's the deal here? And and you have an
Speaker 3: open goal right now to go in and do real
Speaker 3: journalism and expose what we're talking about here that that
Speaker 3: this is not a phenomena that is strictly you know,
Speaker 3: set on the Democrat side. There there are tentacles, you know,
Speaker 3: this is this is the octopus thing. Watch watch the
Speaker 3: Octopus Murders on on Netflix, watch that documentary. That's that's
Speaker 3: what you're dealing with here. That the kind of level
Speaker 3: of things. And again it's an open goal for journalists,
Speaker 3: but mass media cartel journalists won't take it, can't take it.
Speaker 3: Their producers won't allow it, their owners won't allow it,
Speaker 3: the CEOs won't allow it. They have other interests in mind.
Speaker 3: And that's just that. But maybe these things are changing.
Speaker 3: They're certainly losing their audience quickly. They're hamorrhaging audience quickly.
Speaker 3: CNN may have to shut down, Like it'll be interesting
Speaker 3: to see, like two years from now, if we don't
Speaker 3: have a black Swan event of some sort, like how
Speaker 3: many of these you know, media rags hang around and
Speaker 3: are still around, Like can Politico survive without USAI D
Speaker 3: you know, and so many others Really interesting to see.
Speaker 3: If that would be amazing, if a bunch of propaganda
Speaker 3: funding was removed from the media, I would be very
Speaker 3: grateful for that, so that's on my Christmas list.
Speaker 5: Donald, all right, and then I guess we can cover
Speaker 5: real quick to two big nominations. So we got a
Speaker 5: we got the Corilla Deville here, what's up with that
Speaker 5: streak in our hair?
Speaker 3: Anyway, it's a branding thing. I think that everything comes
Speaker 3: down to branding these days. But she called it.
Speaker 5: She referred to it just recently as her signature. Look,
Speaker 5: So I guess.
Speaker 3: So, okay, I think I think it's Storm's signature look.
Speaker 3: But okay, I'm just X men nerd.
Speaker 5: Agree, like a comic book villain. I can't get that
Speaker 5: image out of my head. It's crazy.
Speaker 3: It's straight out of X Men. It looks like Storm. Okay.
Speaker 3: So she's been sworn in as Director of National Intelligence.
Speaker 3: Gabbartt said the intelligence community has been weaponized against the
Speaker 3: American people. Yep. She was confirmed by the Senate in
Speaker 3: a fifty two to forty eight vote. Useless senile Mitch
Speaker 3: McConnell was the lone Republican.
Speaker 5: You willed in in a wheelchair, by the way.
Speaker 3: Seriously, the guys falling down the stairs a couple of
Speaker 3: days before and glitching out. But yeah, he's there to
Speaker 3: cast a vote. That represents the American people. Like okay, dude,
Speaker 3: humiliation rituals against the American public via our supposed representatives,
Speaker 3: right there, perfect example. Anyway, going on, Mitch McConnell was
Speaker 3: a lone Republican to vote with the entire Democratic Caucus
Speaker 3: against Gabbard. Tulcy's the former Democratic representative and was vice
Speaker 3: chair of the d NC. Yeah, yeah, they go through
Speaker 3: her history here, but yeah, that's uh, here's something. Here's
Speaker 3: a comment she made. She said during this swinging ceremony. Unfortunately,
Speaker 3: the American people have very little trust in the intelligence community,
Speaker 3: largely because they've seen the weaponization and politicization of an
Speaker 3: entity that is supposed to be purely focused on ensuring
Speaker 3: art national security. So yeah, well more can you say
Speaker 3: true that?
Speaker 5: Yep, but she had to like she did a flip
Speaker 5: flop on the section seven oh two thing, right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I did hear something about that. During her
Speaker 3: time in Congress, Tulsi was one of the most vocal
Speaker 3: critics of US foreign policy and domestic spying. She often
Speaker 3: argued against American wars in the Middle East that sought
Speaker 3: to overthrow secular dictators, such as in Syria. That's another
Speaker 3: long story for the side. Additionally, Tulsi supported legislation that
Speaker 3: would have repealed FIZA Section seven oh two, which allows
Speaker 3: for mass collection of American data without a warrant. So, yeah,
Speaker 3: that's the kind of thing that you'll see people go
Speaker 3: behind a closed door and come back out and say,
Speaker 3: you know what, I changed my mind, changed my mind.
Speaker 3: Someone took me behind the closed door, showed me some stuff.
Speaker 3: I changed my mind.
Speaker 5: Oh, made her an offer she couldn't refuse.
Speaker 3: Yeah, or or right. Yeah, there's the whole Uh, there's
Speaker 3: an acronym for that whole coercion chain is h in
Speaker 3: play oftentimes. And we got this guy right here, uh
Speaker 3: the Nationalpolse dot Com. We've got Jack Montgomery. God sent
Speaker 3: me President Trump. RFK Juniors quote RFK Junior sworn in
Speaker 3: as HHS Secretary. Robert F. Nnedy Junior has been officially
Speaker 3: sworn in as Health and Human Services Secretary by Supreme
Speaker 3: Court Justice Neil Gorsh in the Oval Office. RFKJ, the
Speaker 3: nephew of the late President JFK and the son of
Speaker 3: the late Attorney General Robert F. K. Robert F. Kennedy
Speaker 3: Senior described how for years he prayed to God to
Speaker 3: put him in a position to tackle the childhood chronic
Speaker 3: disease epidemic grip gripping America, and how quote God sent
Speaker 3: me President Trump. He's kept every promise that he's made
Speaker 3: to me. He's kept his word in every account and
Speaker 3: gone way beyond it. A lot of people told me
Speaker 3: that I couldn't trust President Trump, that I that I
Speaker 3: had better get it in writing. But we did a
Speaker 3: handshake deal, and everything he told me was going he
Speaker 3: was going to do, he has done. End quote. So
Speaker 3: there you go. Rfkj Amen.
Speaker 5: Handshakes are good enough for freemasons, they're good enough for everybody.
Speaker 3: Yeah, these fellow travelers shaking hands here.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 5: I watched his speech and he said the way he
Speaker 5: said it like they glossed over it there, but he
Speaker 5: emotionally was talking about it. He literally would wake up
Speaker 5: every day, and every single day for years, the first
Speaker 5: thing he would do after he got out of bed.
Speaker 5: He wouldn't get up, make coffee, he wouldn't take a piss. No,
Speaker 5: he would slam down on his knees and pray to
Speaker 5: God to put him in a position of power so
Speaker 5: that he could tackle childhood chronic disease. Wow, this guy's
Speaker 5: he's like a saint and that literally, and you did
Speaker 5: say that God sends him r K Junior, Donald Trump weird.
Speaker 3: All right, Well, I'm sure there's good that he can do.
Speaker 3: I'll be interested to see what it is. I would
Speaker 3: just urge him to go back on what he said
Speaker 3: in the confirmation hearing with regards to the child jibby
Speaker 3: jab schedule. I think that would be a fantastic place
Speaker 3: to start. If you really want to show the American
Speaker 3: people that you mean that, then let's take a look
Speaker 3: at that. Let's let's not dismiss that particular topic.
Speaker 5: And he's still insisting he's not anti vax He's like, no,
Speaker 5: I'm not taking away anybody's vaccines. I just have questions
Speaker 5: about that other one. Right, Okay, all the other ones
Speaker 5: are good.
Speaker 3: Apparently weird, that's actually that's actually an okay foundation if
Speaker 3: what he's going to do is actually ask the questions
Speaker 3: that lead to the answers that people deserve. So I'll
Speaker 3: let him get slide by on that one for now.
Speaker 3: We'll have to wait and see. I have very high expectations.
Speaker 3: So uh, the ask is pie in the sky, some
Speaker 3: might say, but we shall see, we shall see. It'll
Speaker 3: be interesting. What's what's with uh, what's with the doge
Speaker 3: dog over here? Is it just Department of Doge or
Speaker 3: is there any crypto news that we need to cover
Speaker 3: before we bang out?
Speaker 5: No, that's just that's the Doge department dog dog. Harry
Speaker 5: Balls his name now or unless he changed it again,
Speaker 5: Harry He used to Harry Balls before. All Right, Well,
Speaker 5: I mean, like the guy has been ostensibly he's been
Speaker 5: placed in charge apparently of this doge thing. He's got
Speaker 5: like a pretty big role currently unofficially in this administration.
Speaker 5: But he's running around like I'm Harry Balls. I mean, dude,
Speaker 5: how serious can you take this guy? I mean, he's
Speaker 5: got a very serious job, don't you think I don't
Speaker 5: see RFK Junior or Tulsi Gabbard like I'm whatever. You know,
Speaker 5: he's so immature, it's so weird. But I guess he's
Speaker 5: on the spectrum and that's cool.
Speaker 1: That happened.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, I think we're Yeah. What a narrative, What
Speaker 3: an insane narrative? What a world of narratives we live
Speaker 3: in Rugus? This is crazy time, really interesting though, I'm
Speaker 3: at least this is more fun to watch go by
Speaker 3: than what was going by in the last four years.
Speaker 3: Hopefully it can remain pleasant. We shall see. We shall see,
Speaker 3: And that's a relative term considering the kind of stuff
Speaker 3: that we've seen in the doomstroll. All right, ruckus over?
Speaker 3: Do you say? Arounds? Final thoughts, let's call it a night.
Speaker 5: So Infidel dropped one that I wanted to mention too
Speaker 5: a little while back about Google.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah we did. I think we talked about that
Speaker 3: last week. That was why I didn't put it on screen.
Speaker 3: But yeah, go ahead for anyone that missed it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, because I'm actually going to talk about this pretty
Speaker 5: as well and expand upon this on my own show.
Speaker 5: But yeah, Google walked back their decision about allowing AI
Speaker 5: to be used for weaponryes. So they're like, yeah, totally cool. Now,
Speaker 5: I think we did talk about this, but it all
Speaker 5: comes this week. The big thing was there was a
Speaker 5: summit going on. So we're past the point of like
Speaker 5: the pandemics and now we're concerned about AI. So they
Speaker 5: had this Giant AI summit meeting thing, and I guess
Speaker 5: Advance has made some comments. He's talking like he wants
Speaker 5: to They're turning where's Advanced from? Ohio is that it. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 5: so Ohio is getting to be a big player in
Speaker 5: the whole thing. But Paris, Paris had an AI summit.
Speaker 5: They made a declaration and the United States and the
Speaker 5: UK declined and the Paris AI summits declaration said AI
Speaker 5: needs to be more quote open, inclusive, transparent, ethical, safe, secure,
Speaker 5: and trustworthy end quote. So we have like the world
Speaker 5: world's elites coming together wanting to make like dei AI
Speaker 5: and Google wants to make weaponized AI. So I don't
Speaker 5: I don't see any good things coming out of this
Speaker 5: AI stuff anytime soon.
Speaker 3: And and open Ai shuttered their AI ethics board. Also yeah,
Speaker 3: I don't. I don't know where this all goes.
Speaker 5: And Elon musk What tried to buy out open Ai
Speaker 5: from Sam Altman, and Sam Altman counter offered him and said,
Speaker 5: I'll buy Twitter. So stupid stuff going on there.
Speaker 3: O great, wild right, It's like the the technocrat bro
Speaker 3: version of like, you know, gambling too much at the saloon.
Speaker 3: I'll put Twitter on the table.
Speaker 5: Oh here, it is what Dvance wants is he wants
Speaker 5: something he calls bias free and uncensored AI.
Speaker 3: Okay, yeah, well.
Speaker 5: Can you handle it? Can you handle that kind of
Speaker 5: level of truth.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well sounds better than the alternative in some ways. Yeah. Well, okay,
Speaker 3: so there you go. Whatever that means, Google, And what
Speaker 3: all do you consider weapons? I think that was my
Speaker 3: main question after we talked about it last week, is like,
Speaker 3: what do you mean by weapon? Does that include weapons
Speaker 3: of mass disinformation, weapons of mass censorship? I mean there's
Speaker 3: weapons on board a quote unquote companion bought or ROBODJ
Speaker 3: I don't know, I don't know.
Speaker 5: And meanwhile, the climate change scares are reducing, but they're
Speaker 5: still ramping up the bird flu thing enough. So it's like,
Speaker 5: so we did talk about this briefly on the last
Speaker 5: episode about the egg shortage thing, but again I just
Speaker 5: thought if we didn't mention it or make the point.
Speaker 5: The point is that all of these animals have been culled,
Speaker 5: not because of the like, we're not having trouble because
Speaker 5: the chickens actually got sick. Now, it's because somebody piece
Speaker 5: yard a river stream five miles away and said, oh,
Speaker 5: you got to kill your flock, you know. So it's
Speaker 5: the culling that's the problem, it's not the actual disease.
Speaker 3: Yeah, one hundred percent. I mean, don't buy the hype folks,
Speaker 3: this stuff going on in the grocery stores right now.
Speaker 3: We saw that in one of our local stores the
Speaker 3: other night, totally cleared out signs on the doors no eggs,
Speaker 3: Sorry about that. There is a mass extermination of food
Speaker 3: supply farm animals that's been going on for years now.
Speaker 3: We've covered the exact numbers on it on multiple broadcasts
Speaker 3: in the past. It's alarming. It's shocking. It's as alarming
Speaker 3: and shocking as the amounts of money that we're talking
Speaker 3: about that are being funneled into, you know, causing us
Speaker 3: to be in cultural warfare against each other, disrupting you know,
Speaker 3: the fabric of family and education. It's all just so
Speaker 3: shocking and egregious.
Speaker 5: My friend, I have a prediction about where that's going
Speaker 5: to lead us since now or big tech bros. It's
Speaker 5: like back in the day, they were like, oh, food scarcity,
Speaker 5: food problems, food is harming the climate, yacht YadA, whatever,
Speaker 5: and they wanted us eat the bugs. Well, now we're
Speaker 5: gonna have the food shortage thanks to whatever reason. It
Speaker 5: doesn't matter, like, oh, we can't fix it now, folks,
Speaker 5: Sure we expose the fraud that they're like, but we
Speaker 5: killed too many of them. They're not coming back. It's
Speaker 5: the birds and the bees, the collapse whatever. You know,
Speaker 5: it's like too late to fix this. So but don't worry.
Speaker 5: We're not going to make you eat the bugs. Luckily,
Speaker 5: this big tech bro right here, pull whoever onto the
Speaker 5: stage just created the world's best lab created meat. You
Speaker 5: won't even tell the difference.
Speaker 3: It's Gill Baits. Gill Bates comes on the stage in
Speaker 3: his lilac colored v NEX sweater and there.
Speaker 5: He is, suddenly Republican. I think you're onto something.
Speaker 3: Yeah, there you go.
Speaker 5: He has been saying nice things about Trump lately in
Speaker 5: the news.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, got to keep the art of the
Speaker 3: deal going, got to keep those relationships up. Do your best,
Speaker 3: Gilly Bates. But I don't know about you guys, but
Speaker 3: we're on to Gil Bates. I think you probably are too.
Speaker 3: And yeah, I think we'll leave it there, Ruckus. Thanks
Speaker 3: so much. Man.
Speaker 5: Oh one last thing. I wish I had the video
Speaker 5: for this one. I was really looking for it, but
Speaker 5: I've just mentioned him brief. Zelinsky was on camera doing
Speaker 5: an interview with somebody and he's talking about resources, how
Speaker 5: important it is now we have to protect Rukrane so
Speaker 5: that Russia doesn't get its juicy resources. Well, so, wait
Speaker 5: a minute, this is no longer about democracy, says the
Speaker 5: guy who's suspended an election now for over a year. Yeah,
Speaker 5: but though this was really not about democracy at all.
Speaker 5: It's about protecting precious resources so that dirty bad putin
Speaker 5: don't get it. And then I guess Trump says he
Speaker 5: wants Keith to start paying them back with the precious
Speaker 5: resources all that aids that we gave them. Oh, you
Speaker 5: owe us. In fact, the Treasury Secretary, Scott Pissent, said
Speaker 5: he personally delivered the demand from the US president straight
Speaker 5: to the Vladimir Zelensky himself. He went to Scott Bessant,
Speaker 5: that's the Treasury secretary. He went to visit Ukraine. He
Speaker 5: hopped on a plane for free. Of course, it didn't
Speaker 5: cost the taxpayers a single dime. Anyways, he secured a
Speaker 5: deal ensuring that Washington gets a return on the billions
Speaker 5: of dollars it's invested in aid to Kiev. I'm reporting
Speaker 5: from Russia today. By the way, Trump recently demanded the
Speaker 5: equivalent of five hundred billion dollars worth of rare earths
Speaker 5: from Kiev in exchange for the more than three hundred
Speaker 5: billion that we gave them thanks to Biden. So I
Speaker 5: guess we're going to make it. We're going to make
Speaker 5: a two hundred billion dollar profit if Zelensky follows through
Speaker 5: with the president's demands, we'll see, man.
Speaker 3: I remember talking with people on TNT about the resources there,
Speaker 3: and you know how people like Elon Musk would benefit
Speaker 3: from some of the resources there, and people that want
Speaker 3: to control the food supply benefit.
Speaker 5: What are the resources I want to know? He doesn't say.
Speaker 3: I believe they have deposits of lithium over there, and
Speaker 3: also grain. Yeah, grain and lithium are the two that
Speaker 3: I can And titanium.
Speaker 5: I don't know what they do that. What do you
Speaker 5: use titanium for?
Speaker 3: All kinds of stuff you build?
Speaker 5: F thirty five?
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, exactly, weapons F thirty five, computer chip boards,
Speaker 3: all kinds of fun.
Speaker 5: Stuff, computer chips really neat?
Speaker 7: Ye?
Speaker 3: How about that? How about that as we enter the
Speaker 3: age of quantum computing? All right? Cool? Well, yeah, that's
Speaker 3: a good one. We'll put that on the show page
Speaker 3: if we can pull it up as a supplemental So yep,
Speaker 3: all right, ruckus save rounds. Final thoughts. Let's do it.
Speaker 4: That's it.
Speaker 5: I'm going to try to record a new Daily Ruckus tomorrow.
Speaker 5: It might not get out tomorrow, might be over the weekend.
Speaker 5: I might push it up till Monday. But it is
Speaker 5: coming and it's huge. It's technically it's kind of like
Speaker 5: twelve episodes in one episode, so bear with me trying
Speaker 5: to make it all fit in at least three hours back,
Speaker 5: so I don't want it to be too long.
Speaker 3: There you go, all right, excellent check out the Daily Ruckus.
Speaker 5: I do have a special announcement. I will be guest
Speaker 5: hosting Weaponized News with Sam Cheney on Monday, so first
Speaker 5: time ever being on Weaponized News. Very much looking forward
Speaker 5: to that. They have a great weekly news program, I
Speaker 5: mean weekday news program. It's at nighttime, so they're on
Speaker 5: every day Monday through Friday. So if you miss the
Speaker 5: news throughout the day, I promise you all you have
Speaker 5: to do is tune into Weaponized News and you are
Speaker 5: caught up and then some and then if you stick
Speaker 5: around after the news, he always plays a really great,
Speaker 5: highly entertaining and informative old school documentary or conference speech.
Speaker 5: Good shit, he's been playing Money Masters, Remember the documentary
Speaker 5: Money Masters?
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Yeah, he played that last night and tonight, so that's
Speaker 5: essential Weaponized News.
Speaker 3: Yeah, check them out one yep, totally all right, excellent, Yeah,
Speaker 3: shout out to Weaponized News. Love that program. It's got
Speaker 3: such a great vibe. You know, I love coming into
Speaker 3: it and getting by this day in history and you know,
Speaker 3: kind of the overhead. It's a it's a cool show.
Speaker 3: So we'll look forward to seeing you on the Ruckus.
Speaker 3: That'll be great, yep.
Speaker 5: And then I'll see you guys around for either a
Speaker 5: Sunday Wire or boiler room next time. So thanks for
Speaker 5: having me, all right. May God bless each and every
Speaker 5: one of you, and God saved this republic.
Speaker 3: All right, Thanks Ruckus, and thank you for being here
Speaker 3: with us tonight. Everybody hanging out in the discord, in
Speaker 3: the Rumble, in the rock fin and the YouTube chats,
Speaker 3: listening to the podcast after the fact, Thanks for being here.
Speaker 3: We really appreciate your time listening to the show, watching
Speaker 3: the show. Yeah, thinking about you know, what we learned
Speaker 3: earlier in the program, or what was stated earlier in
Speaker 3: the program by mister Beauvard in that article up there
Speaker 3: at Big League Politics on substack. Let's think about that
Speaker 3: for just a second before we go, I'm going to
Speaker 3: read that quote again, based Boulevart stated in two thousand
Speaker 3: and nine for an article at Future of Freedom Foundation
Speaker 3: that NED quote, based on the notion that it's meddling
Speaker 3: in foreign elections, is automatically pro democracy because the US
Speaker 3: government is the incarnation of democracy. A NED has always
Speaker 3: operated on the principle that what's good for the US
Speaker 3: government is good for democracy. That, my friends, is what
Speaker 3: they were talking about when they were saying that is
Speaker 3: the very definition of what they were saying about protecting
Speaker 3: democracy in Ukraine. That not what you might think it meant.
Speaker 3: You know, the ability to vote, the ability to speak,
Speaker 3: the ability to you know, do your own religious stuff
Speaker 3: the way you want. No, none of that, all that
Speaker 3: has been taken away quite frankly under Zelensky. So this
Speaker 3: is gonna be very interesting to see how this one
Speaker 3: turns out. All right, This is hesher On, behalf of
Speaker 3: Alternate Current Radio and the boy of the room. Alternate
Speaker 3: Current Radio dot com is where you find us. Join
Speaker 3: our patreon please, this stuff is expensive and time consuming
Speaker 3: to do. We appreciate your support. If you're one of
Speaker 3: those patrons, you're making this happen. Same with our swear
Speaker 3: Jar donors. We really appreciate you. Hesh, you're out, see
Speaker 3: you later. Peace. That's it.
Speaker 8: Go ahead and run, run home and cry to mama.